HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 01062004 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
102924
Box: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 01062004
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community,
a walkable village, which is safe and secure.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
January 6, 2004
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Swearing-in Ceremony. The Oath of Office will be given by Councilmember Thuesen to
Mayor Hodson; Councilmember Faust; Councilmember Horst; and Councilmember Stille.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the Following Items:
I. Approval of the January 6, 2004, City Council Meeting Agenda. Action requested.
II. Proclamations and Recognitions.
A. An Appreciation Plaque will be presented to Christopher Melsha, past Chair of
the Planning Commission.
III. Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular
agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address
for the Clerk's record and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council
will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the
matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on an upcoming
agenda.
IV. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere
on the agenda.
A. Approve December 8, 2003 Regular Council meeting minutes. (pp. 1 - 17)
Approve December 16, 2003 Special Council meeting minutes. (pp. 18 - 19)
B. Licenses and permits. (pp. 20 -22)
C. Claims. (pp. 23 -28)
r
D. "Housekeeping" Resolutions 04-001 - 010: (pp. 29 -46)
001 - Designate Acting Mayor for 2004
002 - Specify persons authorized to make financial transactions
Page 2
003 - Designate official depository for City funds
004 - Designate a legal newspaper
005 - Designate Mayor as participant in outside organizations
006 - Designate Councilmember Thuesen as participant in outside organizations
007 - Designate Councilmember Horst as participant in outside organizations
008 - Designate Councilmember Stille as participant in outside organizations
009 - Designate Councilmember Faust as participant in outside organizations
010 -Adopt Standing Rules of Conduct for City Council Meetings for 2004
E. Resolution 04-016, re: Fannie Mae loan for property acquisition relating to the
Northwest Quadrant Redevelopment project. (pp. 47 - 52)
V. Public Hearings - None.
VI. Reports From Commissions and Staff.
A. A group of residents have requested time on the agenda to present a petition
relating to the location of the new Fire Station.
B. Planning Commission - December 16, 2003. (pp. 53 -60)
1. Resolution 04-011 ( lot coverage variance request); and
2. Resolution 04-012 (front yard setback variance request), by Rod Rabine,
2800-34th Avenue NE. Action requested. (pp. 61 -74)
VII. General Policy Business of the Council.
A. Todd Hubmer, WSB &Associates, Inc., will be present for the following
resolutions relating to 2004 street improvements assessments. Action requested.
(pp. 75 - 77)
1. Resolution 04-013, re: Call hearing on 2004 street and utility
improvements. (p. 78)
2. Resolution 04-014, re: Declare cost to be assessed and order preparation
of proposed street improvement assessments for 2004. (pp. 79 - 80)
3. Resolution 04-015, re: Call hearing on proposed assessments. (pp. 81 -
82)
B. Ordinance 2004-001, re: Amend building code section of ordinance and building
fee charges. (1" reading)Action requested. (pp. 83 -91)
VIII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers.
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Miscellaneous Informational Documents.
XI. Adjournment.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 01
December 8, 2003
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4 -
5 DECEMBER 8, 2003
6
7 CALL TO ORDER F
8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
9
10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust.
15 Absent: None.
16 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson.
17
18 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 I. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 8, 2003, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
22 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen,to approve the City
23 Council Meeting Agenda of December 8, 2003.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27 H. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
28 A. Presentation of an Appreciation Plaque to Councilmember Amy parks
29 Mayor Hodson presented Councilmember Sparks with-a plaque to express grateful appreciation
30 for her years of service. Councilmember Sparks stated she wanted to encourage more people to
31 run for office, as it was a wonderful experience.
32
33 III. COMMUNITY FORUM.
34 Mayor Hodson invited residents to come forward at this time to address Council regarding items
35 that
were not on the regular agenda.
36
37 Dennis Cavanaugh, 2909 St. Anthony Boulevard, stated he wished to thank Councilmember
38 Sparks for her years of service. He added Councilmember Sparks was involved with the
39 community in a very deep way and he appreciated what she did for-the City. He indicated he
40 hoped Councilmember Sparks would continue with her many other activities, as St. Anthony
41 Village really needed her.
42
43 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
44 A. _Approve November 25, 2003,regular Council meeting minutes.
45 B. Consider licenses and permits.
46 C. Consider payment of claims.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 02
December 8,2003
Page 2
1
2 Councilmember Thuesen requested the removal of Consent Agenda Item A.
3
4 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Sparks, to approve Consent
5 Agenda Items B and C.
6
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8
9 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Sparks, to approve Consent
10 Agenda Item A.
11
12 Ayes—3.Nays—0,Abstains—2 (Horst.Thuesen) Motion carried
13
14 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
15 A. Resolution 03-102,re: Truth in Taxation
16 Mayor Hodson opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m.
17
18 City Manager Mornson noted the State mandated truth-in-taxation laws required cities to provide
19 Hennepin and Ramsey Counties with a certified 2004 budget and tax levy.
20
21 Mr. Mornson explained the current year's general fund budget totaled $3,776,400 compared to
22 $3,844,600 for 2003, which represented a$68,200 decrease or 1.77% less. He noted the 2004
23 budget consisted of no new staff positions or programs and was modified to adjust to a$267,348
24 reduction in Local Government Aid. He stated the changes and adjustments in the budget
25 included the following:
26 1. Budget Cuts and Adjustments $ 26,500
27 2. Permanent Reduction in P/W Position $ 30,200
28 3. Eliminate One Community Service Officer $ 10,400
29 4. Additional Expenditure Reductions $ 64,700
30 5. 60% Levy Back for LGA Loss $160,409
31
32 Mr. Mornson indicated the State imposed levy limits for all cities to insure cities would not
33 simply pass on their LGA reductions. He stated St. Anthony's levy limit for 2004($2,329,036)
34 consisted of taking last year's budget levy and adding 60%of the loss in-State Aid.
35
36 Mr. Mornson explained the City portion for a property with a taxable value of$200,000 was
37 equal to$942.80, which represented an increase of$172.24 for a property with a taxable value
38 last year of$183,900. He noted a review of the increase was as follows:
39 1. Budget $40.23
40 2. Roads ($ 5.04)
41 3. Fire Truck $24.41
42 4. Public Works Facility $66.04
43 5. Fire Station $46.85
44 6. Tax Abatement ($ .23)
45 7. PERA Rate Increase ($ .02)
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 03
December 8, 2003
Page 3
1 Mr. Mornson noted, when looking at a breakdown of the 2004 increase, the majority of the
2 increase ($137.30 or 79.7%)was for the debt issued for a new fire truck, the new public works
3 facility and the new fire station.
4
5 Mr. Mornson noted$7,771,054 in grants had been obtained by the City in the past six years. He
6 indicated the City also applied to the Met Council for a grant to provide an open-space park area
7 at Apache Plaza for$900,000 and for a federal grant of almost$750,000 for possible
8 transportation improvements. He stated the City would have received$9.2 million in grants
9 within the last six years if the applications to the Met Council and the federal grant were
10 successful.
11
12 Mr. Mornson indicated the Kenzie Terrace TIF District was decertified to offset some of the cost
13 of the new facilities. He explained the average cost savings for desertification of the District
14 totaled $65.10 and added$335,500 to St. Anthony's tax capacity, which was reflected on the
15 current Truth-in-Taxation Statements. He added an additional reduction in taxes would appear
16 on the final property tax statements due to the refinancing of the 1993, 1994 and 1995 Road
17 Improvement Bonds,with average savings equal to $38.78.
18
19 Mr. Mornson explained this was the fourth or fifth meeting held by Council regarding the 2004
20 budget and all key executive staff were in attendance and available to answer questions.
21
22 Mr. Mornson recommended Council approve Resolution 03-102 setting the 2004 property tax
23 levy as presented to comply with State law and truth-in-taxation requirements. He noted this
24 included a reduction in the Road Improvement Levy of$112,618.
25
26 Dennis Cavanaugh, 2909 St. Anthony Boulevard,noted he had never enjoyed living in St.
27 Anthony Village more than at present; however, to him property taxes represented cash"I have
28 to come up with." Mr. Cavanaugh listed other taxes, insurances and assessment that also had or
29 would increase,which also represented cash expenses to a homeowner.
30
31 Mr. Cavanaugh indicated he felt `eve have a middle-class squeeze going on." He stated the
32 homeowner needed empathy, as the economy had changed; therefore, a review of what was
33 being paid for services and how the City was paying for them might be needed. He cited a Star
34 Tribune article that indicated St. Anthony Village was"number one"on the property tax list. He
35 noted residents living in Hennepin County were paying a little less.
36
37 Mr. Cavanaugh indicated property tax reform was more bad news for residential owners, as they
38 could not pass increases on to anyone. He noted it had been said government should be made
39 more productive in the same way businesses were and asked how a resident went about
40 obtaining this productivity. He added the Taxpayers League of Minnesota had done more
41 damage than anyone.
42
43 Mr. Cavanaugh stated he could ask the City's department heads many questions about
44 productivity; however,he was not equipped to do so because he"did not have the language." He
45 provided copies of an example of City productivity to Council, which related to the City's fire
46 department and its activities. He indicated there was"quite a vogue"for fees, which meant
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 04
December 8, 2003
Page 4
1 residents were paying property taxes along with fee charges. He noted the report indicated many
2 of the calls came from the St. Anthony Nursing Home,whose property taxes had decreased. He
3 added it might be appropriate to charge a fee after a certain number of calls.
4
5 Mr. Cavanaugh indicated another area of concern was mutual aid calls,which were made by
6 another community that did not have all of the necessary equipment to handle a call. He noted
7 St. Anthony Village was a resource to the larger community because of its large fire department.
8 He suggested a fee be charged for these calls, as some of these communities would be willing to
9 pay the fee.
10
11 Mr. Cavanaugh stated it was hard for residents to know"what the benchmark is." He suggested
12 the option of approaching the Legislature collectively, which would hopefully empower
13 residents to make changes in property taxes. He indicated the development of certain measures
14 of productivity might be another option.
15
16 Mr. Cavanaugh noted his final thought related to the fire station. He stated he should be happy
17 the fire station left his neighborhood, as he had benefited and the change was dramatic. He
18 indicated he did not think the City appreciated what it was doing by locating the station in a
19 residential area and added the houses in the surrounding were being sold for a reason. He also
20 questioned the architecture of the building, as, in his opinion, the fire station would look better
21 than the community center. He noted the main responsibility of the Fire Department appeared to
22 be responding to medical calls and asked if the architecture and landscaping were needed to
23 handle medical calls. He suggested the Fire Department's current temporary location be
24 considered, as it seemed to be working. He added the opportunity should be taken to combine
25 police and fire at that location, which would make available needed community center space. He
26 suggested services would still remain at a high level if this action were taken.
27
28 Hugh Gallagher, 3112 Hilldale Avenue NE, stated he had been a St. Anthony resident for 31
29 years. He indicated the St. Anthony portion of his taxes went up 30% and 60% was due to the
30 fire station and public works building. He asked what the additional 40%included, as it
31 appeared the budget did not increase from the past year to the current year. Mr. Mornson
32 responded the other main increase was the additional $160,000 levied,which was 60% of the
33 State aid cut. He explained there were three components to the levy increase: the public works
34 building and fire station, an equipment certificate issued for a fire truck and the $160,000 levied
35 for the general fund.
36
37 Mr. Gallagher asked if copies of the budget presentation were available to residents. Mr.
38 Mornson replied they were.
39
40 Councilmember Faust explained the State had given the City$267,000, which would reduce the
41 amount needed from the taxpayers;however,that amount had been taken away. He noted the
42 State allowed the City to levy 60% of that amount, which equaled$160,000, and that was called
43 property tax reform. He added the property taxes of residents increased because of the lost
44 $267,000, even though the City's overall budget was reduced.
45
05
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
December 8, 2003
Page 5
1 Councilmember Sparks noted State payments should be decreasing and City payments would.be
2 increasing, as that was the goal.
3
4 Councilmember Faust discussed another tax reform that took place a few years ago where the
5 school levy was stopped and State aid was given to the schools,which was charged against all
6 commercial and seasonal recreational property. He noted the State did not tell taxpayers they
7 had to raise that tax levy to get the amount of money needed and,in addition, the schools had to
8 go back to get more money, as it was shifted away from them.
9
10 Councilmember Faust stated he agreed with Mr. Cavanaugh when he indicated there was a shift
11 of tax burden when commercial properties and apartments were compressed and made less or
12 closer to residential taxes. He noted the commercial to residential ratio had been 3:1 at one
13 however, it was currently down to 1.5-1.7:1. He added the same budget was still needed;
14 however, it was obtained from a different group. He noted this also was under property tax
15 reform.
16
17 Councilmember Faust stated he was often at the Legislature discussing how the tax burden gets
18 "pushed down,"which the Legislature called"accountability." He added St. Anthony
19 representatives to the State Senate and House understood the problem and heard it"loud and
20 clear from us"; however,he stated they happened to be in the minority.
21.
22 Councilmember Thuesen indicated he agreed with Mr. Cavanaugh regarding the need to be
23 diligent before the State Legislature. He indicated the City knew it was facing these hard
24 decisions after the Legislature finished its business the previous year. He added the difficulties
25 at the resident's level needed to be continually brought before the Legislature when they came
26 back in session.
27
28 A resident residing at 3201 Hilldale Avenue NE, noted he was a retiree who shared the voiced
29 concerns and agreed with Mr. Cavanaugh's comments. He indicated the biggest area from
30 which taxes could be reduced and money saved was the"Fire Department situation." He stated
31 the Parks Board was not happy to see the Fire Department next to the new park and homeowners
32 were concerned, as indicated by the"For Sale"signs. He asked if there was still time to
33 reconsider and find a more cost-effective solution.
34
35 Amelia Kramarczak, 3920 Macalaster(?), stated she had lived in the community for 23 years.
36 She noted she agreed with Mr. Cavanaugh and added she was a person'suffering"real property
37 discrimination." She added her taxes were increased every year;however,no one ever asked her
38 what she as a"widow, pensioner and cripple"needed. She asked where her choice was, as her
39 taxes were increased and damage to her property went unnoticed. She asked why she had no
40 place where she could complain and noted City government had power she did not have. She
41 asked the City not to "rip up people who work hard."
42
43 John Kuharski, 2709 Paul Avenue, noted he had not heard an answer regarding fees being
44 charged to other communities for fire department services. He also asked if the liquor store's
45 large profit was included in the 2004 budget. His third question was if it was still possible to put
City Council Regular.Meeting Minutes 06
December 8, 2003
Page 6
1 the Fire Department in a commercial area rather than in a residential area. He stated he wanted
2 to hear the answers before he left.
3
4 Councilmember Faust responded the answers to Mr. Kuharski questions were "yes,""yes" and
5 "maybe." He noted the issue of fees had been discussed previously and could be addressed
6 again;however, he warned in some cases more cost could be created.
7
8 Councilmember Faust explained the money did come back to the City from the liquor operation.
9 He noted the redevelopment of the Stonehouse would bring that piece of property onto the tax
10 rolls, as it would be commercial property. He indicated the old Stonehouse property would
11 generate somewhere between$60,000 and$100,000 a year in real estate taxes, depending on its
12 value. He noted only 47%to 48%of that amount came to the City,however. He stated the
13 City's liquor operation was currently diminished somewhat; however, he believed it would be
14 bigger and better when"up and running"this summer.
15
16 Councilmember Faust noted 18 months ago the City started the fire station process by creating a
17 task force that consisted of 19 people who met many times and held three or four public
18 meetings. He indicated a lease revenue bond was issued in May that saved$1 million in interest
19 because it was obtained at the bottom of the market. He added councilmembers were reelected
20 and he felt that was a strong endorsement of the City's plans. He noted it would not be cheap to
21 stop the process,as there would be no way to "go back to zero dollars." He added there would
22 be significant cost to step back and do the fire station another way.
23
24 Councilmember Faust indicated he had been an appraiser for 15 years and had never been able to
25 demonstrate a reduction in real estate value because of proximity to various buildings, as "every
26 person's pleasure is another person's pain." He noted one person might not like to live by a park
27 and another may seek out such a location. He added he overheard a father asking his son if he
28 would"like to live here because you could walk to school." He stated he understood people
29 were concerned because of the changes;however,the next generation probably would not know
30 the difference. He explained the task force had considered many sites and this site was
31 recommended, with no pressure from Council.
32
33 Councilmember Thuesen stated he wished to address the question of charging fees. He indicated
34 that item could be brought to the table but asked if the very same people who were on fixed
35 incomes and negatively impacted by tough economic times would be adversely affected by fees.
36 He noted it was probably true more service calls were going to elderly people on fixed incomes.
37
38 Councilmember Thuesen suggested that copies of Mr. Momson's presentation be made available
39 to residents.
40
41 Mr. Cavanaugh suggested information go out to the City's elderly residents regarding an
42 available program that allowed them relief from their property taxes. He explained a lien was
43 placed on their property that would be settled when the property was sold. Councilmember
44 Faust added the program was a State program and only 1% of the real estate tax had to be paid.
45 He indicated the rest became a lien on the property,which was a 3%loan with the State. He
46 stated this information would be included in the next newsletter.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 07
December 8, 2003
Page 7
1 Paul Gabler, 2921 Hilldale Avenue, stated he had lived in his current home since 1960. He
2 indicated he also had a 30+% increase in property taxes. He asked Mr. Mornson if the reduction
3 to be brought before Council at the current meeting was reflected in the budget presentation.
4 Mr. Mornson replied it was not.
5
6 Mr. Gabler asked for information regarding a reduction mentioned a few weeks ago. Mr.
7 Mornson responded the City's decision to decertify the Kenzie District last fall produced more
8 tax capacity for the City, which was reflected in the budget presentation. He added the current
9 resolution before Council represented $112,000 less than what was before Council in September.
10
11 Mr. Gabler asked for a copy of the budget presentation and indicated he also would like to see
12 the Fire Department located in a more commercial setting.
13
14 Rob LeFleur, 3312 Skycroft Drive, stated the fire station was a major capital expenditure and he
15 wondered if enough thought had gone into.how the City should deliver this important service.
16 He asked if having one of the City's larger commercial enterprises impacting surrounding
17 neighborhoods and a park was a good idea.
18
19 Earl Shamp, 3509—31"Avenue NE, stated he greatly enjoyed living in St. Anthony Village and
20 indicated he wanted Council to seriously consider Mr. Cavanaugh's presentation.
21
22 Tom Nelson, 2840 Silver Lake Road, stated he wanted to thank Mayor Hodson and the members
23 of the Council for their service to the community, which made St. Anthony Village a better
24 place. Mr. Nelson stated his family had lived in St. Anthony Village for 29 years so they could
25 be closer to their jobs. He noted they were amazed at how quickly the streets and even alleys
26 were plowed when they first moved into the City. He indicated currently the alley was not
27 plowed unless there was a terrific amount of snow and then only after a rutted pathway had been
28 made by vehicles and trucks. He asked why City government could not deliver basic services
29 when the tax burden on residents was approximately double when compared to cities of
30 comparable size.
31
32 Mr. Nelson asked why his portion of city property taxes had increased 25%, as his wages did not
33 go up 25%. He noted the School Board had also increased his tax burden but added he at least
34 had the opportunity to vote on that issue. He indicated this tax increase lowered his family's
35 standard of living.
36
37 Mr.Nelson indicated he"loved"the location of the temporary fire station, as the fire trucks,
38 police cars and ambulances were no longer"roaring up Silver Lake Road." He stated his
39 family's standard of living had increased because of the Fire Department's move to its current
40 location.
41
42 Mr. Nelson stated a decision must be made to lower the burden of City government on the lives
43 of residents. He added City staff must be willing to make cost-effective decisions for
44 homeowners or changes in City personnel needed to be made. He noted State and County
45 governments had been able to manage their affairs within limitations.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 08
December 8, 2003
Page 8
1 Mr. Nelson cited the comment made that approximately$267,000 of State funding had been lost
2 and stated one of the reasons the State had cut the funds to City government was"there was
3 never enough money." He noted the decision last spring to buy a new fire truck and stated a
4 better choice would have been to refurbish the existing fire truck,which would have cost the
5 City less money while meeting the needs of the community. He stated the City of Minneapolis
6 had been refurbishing their fire trucks from the 1970s and 1980s and added private businesses
7 and private citizens must make those types of decisions. He asked that the hard-earned dollars of
8 residents not be wasted.
9
10 Rick Lundeen, 3904 Fordham Drive, stated he had lived in St. Anthony Village for 50 years,
11 paid taxes for 33 years and been a member of the Fire Department for almost 34 years. He
12 agreed he did not want his taxes to increase. He indicated he had heard all negatives and not any
13 plusses and suggested citizens come to the Fire Department and meet its personnel, as they were
14 also taxpayers. He suggested personnel response time to reach the fire station needed to be
15 considered and added an industrial park location would not work. He stated"handfuls"of
16 people approved of the new location and those attending the current meeting were the"handful"
17 who disapproved.
18
19 Mr. Lundeen stated the City of Minneapolis did not refurbish its fire trucks from the 1970s and
20 1980s and added St. Anthony Village also did not buy a new fire truck, as a demo fire truck had
21 been purchased to save the City money.
22
23 Mr. Lundeen stated Fire Department personnel had saved the lives of people in the City. He
24 asked the residents to come to the fire station to "see what we are like before you condemn it."
25
26 Mr. Lundeen noted the taxes on his lake home had just increased by$240 and he was not able to
27 say anything about that. He stated he was glad he "could say something here." He warned that
28 residents did not appreciate their fire department until the life of a loved one was saved by its
29 personnel. He added the Fire Department was very considerate about using the sirens in
30 residential areas.
31
32 Mr. Lundeen asked Council to listen to all the residents who approved the new location and not
33 only those who were in attendance at the present meeting.
34
35 Another Village resident, who has lived on Armour Terrace for many years, stated he enjoyed St.
36 Anthony Village, as it was a nice, safe area in which to live. He indicated he read the article in
37 the Minneapolis Tribune that indicated St. Anthony Village was the most expensive place in
38 Ramsey/Hennepin counties with the highest tax increase. He noted he appreciated the road
39 improvements, driveway improvements, new fire station and new public works station; however,
40 he did not understand why the City was the most expensive area in the counties. He added the
41 areas surrounding the City did not have such a large tax burden. He cited the amount of taxes he
42 would need to pay, along with the percentages. He stated Council and City staff were doing a
43 good job but again questioned why St. Anthony Village was the most expensive area in which to
44 live.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 09
December 8, 2003
Page 9
1 He noted the increase in the value of homes in the City was approximately 12%to 14%. He
2 stated residents were not getting back their investment. He asked Council to read the Tribune_ . .
3 article and analyze the benefits received by the City's residents.
4
5 Mayor Hodson closed the public hearing at 8:32 p.m.
6
7 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Horst, to adopt Resolution 03-
8 102 setting the City of St. Anthony 2004 Tax Levy and Budget in compliance with the Truth-In-
9 Taxation Act.
10
11 Discussion:
12
13 Councilmember Horst stated he was as concerned as anyone and he had also seen the Tribune
14 article. He indicated it must be realized the City had two simultaneous infrastructure projects in
15 progress, which had been"put off'40 to 50 years. He added the two projects had unfortunately
16 both surfaced because the timing was right and the City was realizing a higher tax burden,which
17 would probably never happen again. He stated the argument would be justifiable if the City was
18 doing this every year.
19
20 Councilmember Horst noted the City would have the fire trucks it needed for the next ten years
21 and would have a fire station for another 40 to 50 years, along with a public works facility that
22 was finally safe. He added a tremendous amount had been accomplished during the last four
23 years, as the City had moved ahead further than in the last 30 years. He stated he hoped future
24 discussions would relate to the location of the fire station and not the need for a fire department,
25 as the Fire Department was an integral part of the community. He added further discussions
26 would probably be held regarding the location.
27
28 Councilmember Faust stated he felt Council and City staff were very up front with everyone
29 regarding the cost of the projects. He added he believed an opportunity presented itself that was
30 over and above what would be seen again concerning the public facilities. He indicated, in his
31 opinion, this was the right thing to do.
32
33 Councilmember Faust stated the infrastructure did not always wear out"on our timeline"and it
34 was difficult to program these improvements in a built-up community. He noted residents were
35 being heard and diligent work was being done on redevelopment. He cited Stonehouse,which
36 would become a taxable property, and the addition at Autumn Woods, which would add to the
37 tax base. He added it was unfortunate.cities could not control the Legislature.
38
39 Councilmember Faust stated it was common to complain about high taxes but also complain
40 about services. He noted the City was trying to find"that happy medium," as complaints were
41 taken seriously and different options were considered at goal-setting sessions. He added care
42 needed to be taken regarding what was implemented, as there was a reaction for every action.
43 He stated the City probably needed to do a better job of communicating with people.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 10
December 8, 2003
Page 10
1 Mayor Hodson thanked all those who had participated and noted this was the most participation
2 he had seen in the past four years. He indicated he was glad to see "you are concerned enough to
3 voice your concerns,"as this was an opportunity to shape the.community.
4
5 Mayor Hodson stated he was proud to be a part of this growth in the community and noted the
6 present Council was also responsible for bringing a larger tax base to the City. He indicated all
7 residents had paid because attention was not given to the declining tax base; however,
8 redevelopment projects such as Apache Plaza,the Stonehouse property, the new liquor store,
9 restaurant,bar and retail space would increase the City's tax base. He added Culvers was
10 already contributing and Autumn Woods would be adding additional units. He indicated every
11 possible square inch of the City needed to be developed to increase the tax base.
12
13 Mayor Hodson explained the site options for the fire station had been thoroughly considered. He
14 noted the chosen site was not his choice; however, the advice of the task force and voice of the
15 majority had been taken and taxpayers and residents must honor the decision.
16
17 Mayor Hodson indicated St. Anthony Village was an"incredible, beautiful city"with great
18 volunteers, residents and staff. He stated the goal was to obtain as much strength as possible by
19 maximizing the amount of revenue through redevelopment of other underutilized areas.
20
21 Mayor Hodson stated he hoped those who disagreed with the outcome would not stop coming to
22 voice their opinions. He added he agreed the City's services needed to be reviewed and
23 questioned if the review should be made more public by the use of a task force. He also
24 suggested it might be time for an additional survey to discover the"things you want and do not
25 want." He asked that residents keep communicating through e-mail, telephone or direct
26 conversation, as that was the only way Council and staff could hear the interests and concerns of
27 the City's citizens.
28
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30
31 Mayor Hodson called a recess at 8:42 p.m.
32
33 Mayor Hodson called the meeting back in session at 8:49 p.m.
34
35 VI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
36 A. Status report on the Fire Station by G@U Benson,Kraus-Anderson, and Jeff Oertel,
37 Oertel Architects.
38 Gary Benson,Kraus-Anderson, stated he was present to give an update on the fire station. He
39 explained the results of the bids were brought before Council a couple of months ago; however,
40 the bids exceeded budget and redesign and rebid were necessary. He indicated many meetings
41 with staff, architects and engineers had been conducted and the redesign of the project was on
42 budget, according to estimates. He noted the redesign featured a one-story facility that was
43 3,000 square feet smaller than the previous design. He added it was expected deduct alternates
44 would be included in the rebid. He stated the goal was to go out with plans for bidding in late
45 January of 2004 and receive bids back in late February of 2004,with a completion date still
46 planned for November of 2004.
11
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
December 8, 2003
Page 11
1 Jeff Oertel, Oertel Architects, stated the following had been performed by the project team since
2 October 8, 2003:
3 1. Several strategy sessions to determine valued engineering items and cost savings.
4 2. Several planning meetings with the Fire Department's design committee.
5 3. Several meetings with the entire Fire Department to discuss design options.
6 4. Preparation of updated plans and options.
7 5. Preparation of a final design.
8 6. Preparation of a cost estimate.
9
10 Mr. Oertel explained the current proposed plan was very similar to the previous plan, except the
11 building was now all one level. He noted the entire central apparatus:bay and work/technical
12 space to the west of the bays remained unchanged and the exterior appearance was consistent
13 with the design approved by the Planning Commission and Council. He indicated the major
14 changes were the elimination of the second floor and the department's sleeping and activity
15 areas were moved to the first floor. He added the total area was reduced from approximately
16 14,000 square feet to approximately 11,000 square feet. He noted almost half of the eliminated
17 area was for space that was not really functional/usable by the department(two levels of
18 stairways located at each end of the building, along with an elevator and equipment room). He
19 stated there was one less dorm room for a total of three dorm rooms, the assistant chief s office
20 was eliminated, the restrooms were downsized and there was less storage.
21 -
22 Mr. Oertel indicated Kraus-Anderson prepared a cost estimate for the new design and the
23 modifications to the building, along with additional changes to the mechanical and electrical
24 system,were projected to meet the budget..He added this included hose tower and,without the
25 tower, the cost of the building would be below the budget,based on estimates.
26
27 Mr. Oertel presented prints of the new design from various viewpoints.
28
29 Councilmember Horst asked if the hose tower was part of the plan or a deduct. Mr. Oertel
30 responded he would like to put the hose tower in as an alternate but currently felt the budget was
31 met with the hose tower included.
32
33 Councilmember Horst asked if everything cited on the plan was included. Mr. Oertel.responded
34 it was. He added, in addition to eliminating the second floor, the mechanical and electrical
35 systems were changed. He noted the hose tower was considered vital by the firefighters.
36
37 Councilmember Thuesen asked if a decision had been made to go with a unisex bathroom. Mr.
38 Oertel responded both men's and women's bathrooms were needed from a code standpoint;
39 however, there was a unisex shower and toilet room that staff would have to share.
40
41 Councilmember Thuesen asked if the building would be able to accommodate any needs for
42 expansion, as thought should be given to functional service in the future as well as the present.
43 Mr. Oertel responded there was some ability to expand to the north. He added it would add quite
44 a bit of cost if the City decided to expand upward.
45
12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
December 8,2003
Page 12
1 Councilmember Faust stated taking out radiant infloor heating and installing overhead radiant . .
2 had been discussed. He indicated he understood there was an energy savings with infloor
3 heating; however, the infloor cost was initially higher but had a payback of approximately two to
4 three years. Mr. Oertel responded he was not certain that was true, as he had worked on many
5 buildings with infloor radiant and overhead radiant. He cited examples that suggested the
6 payback was not that significant. He explained he thought the differences had more to do with
7 preference and comfort. He noted a mechanic working in a bay would prefer the infloor and the
8 heat could be lowered because it was on the floor. He added overhead radiant was better for
9 equipment and apparatus, however. He indicated he did not believe the savings would be
10 significant because people were not working on the floor.
11
12 Councilmember Faust asked if the boilers used for infloor versus ceiling would be different or if
13 the same one could be used, such as a modulating condensing boiler. Mr. Oertel responded
14 boilers could be very efficient;however, the new building did not require boilers. He noted
15 quite a bit of money was saved by using a direct-fired radiant overhead and then using package
16 units in the living and working areas.
17
18 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
19 A. Resolution 03-103,re: Call for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Tax
20 Increment Bonds, Series 1995B.
21 City Manager Mornson noted the City of St. Anthony issued$2.65 million in bonds to fund a
22 portion of the Community Center(City Hall)project. He explained the debt service for these
23 bonds was paid from Kenzie tax increment revenue and the increment from the bonds had
24 exceeded debt service requirements; therefore, the City had sufficient funds to pay off the
25 outstanding bonds. He stated the call date on these bonds was February 2004 and, in order to
26 call the bonds on that date, it was necessary to issue a call notice 30 days prior to February 1,
27 2004. He indicated Resolution 03-103 was prepared to authorize the bond call and, once the
28 resolution was approved, Ehlers and Associates would prepare and deliver the call notice and
29 coordinate the final payout.
30
31 Mr. Mornson stated the City had invested the funds required to redeem the outstanding bonds
32 and these investments would be converted to cash prior to the closing date. He indicated the
33 amount of funds required at closing was estimated at$1.28 million plus accrued interest and
34 Ehlers would coordinate the transfer of funds required to complete this call with Finance
.35 Director Larson.
36
37 Mr. Mornson noted the City initiated action to decertify the Kenzie tax increment district earlier
38 this year, which would be effective for the 2004 tax year. He added it was expected the City's
39 tax capacity would increase by about 6% and this increased base would provide a significant
40 benefit for taxpayers.
41
42 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Sparks,to adopt Resolution 03-
43 103 calling for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series
44 1995B, dated December 1, 1995.
45
46 Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 13
December 8, 2003
Page 13
1
2 B. Resolution 03-101. re: Union and non-union salaries and benefit packages for 2004 and
3 2005.
4 City Manager Momson stated he had come to agreements with two bargaining units for 2004
5 and 2005,which represented the 16 full-time employees in the fire and public works bargaining
6 units. He noted he had not had an opportunity to negotiate with the police due to scheduling
7 difficulties;however, that contract would be negotiated in 2004.
8 Mr. Momson explained a summary of the agreements was as follows:
9 1. Salary increase of 1.5%in 2004; salary increase of 2.0%in 2005.
10 2. Health insurance increase for family was $30 in both 2004 and 2005.
11 3. Cap on personal leave for new hires after January 1, 2004,was 1,200 hours.
12 4. Comp time would be paid prior to December 31, 2003, for fire union and all non-union
13 employees.
14 5. No comp time would be allowed, except as specified in the public works contract on a
15 limited basis or if the time was used in the year it was earned. He noted a$100,000
16 liability due for payout had been found through an audit done by the City. He added the
17 liability was currently down to $24,000, which would be paid at the end of the year.
18
19 Mr. Momson indicated the total number of non-union employees was 22 and the resolution
20 provided the same salary and benefit package to all full-time non-union employees for 2004 and
21 2005. He added the total number of employees covered by Resolution 03-101 was 38,which he
22 recommended Council approve.
23
24 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to adopt Resolution
25 03-101 approving full-time public works and fire union employees' and non-union City
26 employees' salary and benefit packages for 2004 and 2005.
27
28 Discussion:
29
30 Councihmember Faust thanked the City's public employees, as they understood the City was
31 experiencing tough economic times and were willing to shoulder part of the burden. He
32 congratulated the City Manager and Department Heads for what had been done with the
33 unfunded liability of comp time.
34
35 Mayor Hodson stated he echoed what had been said by Councilmember Faust and felt the
36 teamwork should be applauded. He noted it was easy to criticize staff; however, this agreement
37 showed their commitment to the community.
38
39 Motion carried unanimously.
40
41 C. Ordinance 2003-017,re: Amend personal leave.
42 City Manager Morrison noted this ordinance would mean full-time employees, hired after
43 January 1, 2004, would have a maximum cap on their personal leave of 1,200 hours. He added
44 there currently was no cap on personal leave hours and this change would be consistent with
45 changes in the union contracts.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 14
December 8, 2003
Page 14
1 Mr. Mornson recommended Council waive the second and third readings of Ordinance 2003-017
2 and adopt.
3
4 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to adopt Ordinance
5 2003-017 relating to personal leave, amending Section 300.09, subd. 2 of the 1993 St. Anthony
6 Code.
7
8 Friendly amendment by Councilmember Faust to waive the second and third readings and adopt
9 Ordinance 2003-017 at the current meeting.
10
11 Motion carried unanimously.
12
13 D. Resolution 03-104, re: Call a Special Council meetin&
14 City Manager Mornson noted Council called a Special City Council meeting for Tuesday,
15 December 16, 2003,beginning at 3:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, for the purpose of
16 conducting interviews for the upcoming vacancies on the Planning and Parks Commissions. He
17 recommended Council adopt Resolution 03-104 calling the Special City Council meeting.
18
19 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to adopt Resolution
20 03-104 calling a Special City Council meeting for Tuesday, December 16, 2003,beginning at
21 3:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
22
23 Motion carried unanimously.
24
25 E. Resolution 03-105, re: Change regular Council meeting date.
26 City Manager Mornson noted Council desired to conduct a swearing-in ceremony for the Mayor
27 and three Councilmembers who were elected by St. Anthony residents in the November 4, 2003,
28 local election; therefore, the first Council meeting in 2004 would be changed to Tuesday,
29 January 6, 2004, beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. It was added the regularly
30 scheduled Council meeting of January 13,.2004, was canceled.
31
32 Mr. Mornson noted the other reasons for the date change were a December follow-up Council
33 meeting to the December Planning Commission meeting had not been planned and, in addition,
34 bid openings were due in December for the 2004 street project and staff wished to complete the
35 review earlier.
36
37 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Sparks, to adopt Resolution 03-
38 105 to change the first regularly scheduled City Council meeting of 2004 to Tuesday, January 6,
39 2004,beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
40
41 Motion carried unanimously.
42
43 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
44 City Manager Mornson reported the following:
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 7 5
December 8, 2003
Page 15
1 ■ A list of the public meetings for 2004 would be posted on the City's website. He
2 explained the list included the dates of Council and Commission meetings, along with the
3 dates scheduled for joint meetings of the City Council and School Board.
4 ■ The Autumn Woods project was scheduled to break ground this winter; however, the
5 owner indicated the groundbreaking would be delayed until spring because of the
6 weather, late start and somewhat soft multi-family market. He noted this was not a sign
7 the development would not be completed.
8 ■ "A lot of dirt"was being moved around by Amcon at the old Stonehouse site. He
9 indicated the developer was anticipating the possibility of paving. He added an early to
10 late spring opening for the liquor store was still planned.
11 ■ The closing on the Apache project would take place within the next week. He stated staff
12 was meeting"feverishly"with the development team and meetings would intensify, as
13 the goal was to get plats recorded before the end of the year.
14 ■ The 39"Avenue project feasibility study was in its beginning stages.
15 ■ Mayor Hodson and he went to the Met Council the previous week, as"this project does
16 have some regional significance." He indicated the visit was to promote that significance
17 to obtain more funding.
18
19 Councilmember Horst reported he had attended the Community Services Board meeting the
20 previous Thursday. He explained the main topic of discussion was the budget for the 2004-2005
21 school year, as the grandfather levy was no longer available. He noted the Community Services
22 budgeting process would need to "tighten its belt"by approximately$60,000,particularly as it
23 related to senior and adult education programs and Parks and Recreation programs. He added
24 this was a topic Council would discuss at its goal setting session in January.
25
26 Councilmember Horst indicated the Community Services Board was seeking a couple of Board
27 members. He stated if a member of the public was interesting in being an at-large member of the
28 Board he/she should contact Kathy Knapp at Community Services.
29
30 Councilmember Horst thanked those who supported him for reelection.
31
32 Councilmember Horst thanked Councilmember Sparks for the hard work and dedication she
33 brought to her job as a Councilmember.
34
35 Councilmember Horst wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
36
37 Councilmember Sparks stated she had no report but wished to thank all for the gift and good
38 wishes.
39
40 Councilmember Thuesen suggested copies of the 2004 public meetings list be made available to
41 residents.
42
43 Councilmember Thuesen stated he wished to commend Councilmember Sparks for her hard
44 work. He indicated no one could question her devotion and passion for the community.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 16
December 8,2003
Page 16
1 Councilmember Faust reported he and Mr. Mornson had a meeting with the Hennepin County
2 assessor and his staff the previous Wednesday regarding growth in property values and where
3 the trends were. He noted property values were increasing in St. Anthony Village at a very fast
4 rate and the trend would continue. He added property values did not cause taxes; however,
5 spending did cause taxes and Council would watch the spending.
6
7 Councilmember Faust explained a Blue Ribbon Panel had been started the previous year, which
8 had to do with telemedicine education, employment and training. He stated on December 5, the
9 previous Friday,Mayor Hodson, a couple of staff members and he had the opportunity to meet
10 with the"heart institute guru,"Dr. Goldberg, who showed them how telemedicine could be set
11 up and utilized. He noted, ironically, there was a recent newspaper article relating to rural
12 Minnesota and telemedicine. He indicated telemedicine did not have to be exclusively rural but
13 could be a way to help elderly people stay in their homes and mitigate some of the costs of
14 entering into a nursing home. He stated the Northwest Quadrant would be the first area with
15 access, which would hopefully move on from there. He added telemedicine was currently in an
16 infantile stage; however, he felt it was doable with the will of residents and developers.
17
18 Councilmember Faust stated he also wished to thank Councilmember Sparks. He asked her to
19 keep active with Village Fest if possible, as she had done an outstanding job. He added she
20 would always have Council's ear.
21
22 Mayor Hodson reported he and Mr. Mornson attended a meeting with the Met Council on
23 December 1, where they thanked the Met Council for allocating the grant for asbestos abatement
24 and the Local Community Grant to "kick off"the Apache/Northwest Quadrant redevelopment.
25 He noted the Met Council had identified those who would receive future funding and it did not
26 appear St. Anthony Village was one of those chosen. He added Met Council staff, however,
27 brought them aside and indicated it was possible they had found an additional funding source for
28 the City.
29
30 Mayor Hodson stated Councilmember Faust and Mr. Mornson had spent a considerable amount
31 of time keeping relationships going and noted the amount of grants awarded to the City in the
32 last six/seven years had been incredible for a community the size of St. Anthony Village. He
33 added Council and staff were working diligently to look for revenue sources, despite the
34 increases being seen in taxes.
35
36 Mayor Hodson indicated he was encouraged about a federal source of funds that might be
37 available for the 39'Avenue/Apache redevelopment area. He added staff and Council were
38 continuing to work toward bringing additional funds into the community.
39
40 Councilmember Faust stated the grant total of$7,771,054 equated to $971 per resident,which
41 was a"pretty awesome"amount for a City of 8,000 people.
42
43 Mayor Hodson thanked Councilmember Sparks for her work in the community. He noted a lot
44 of what she did went unnoticed, as she was not only on the City Council but also involved in
45 many other activities. He stated Council would miss working with Councilmember Sparks and
46 thanked the residents who encouraged her to continue her work with the community.
17
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
December 8, 2003
Page 17
1 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
2 None.
3
4 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
5 None.
6
7 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
8 Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 9:25 p.m.
9
10
11
12 Respectfully submitted,
13
14
15 Marjorie R. Jenkins
16 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
17
18
19 Mayor
20 ATTEST:
21 City Clerk
22
18
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday,December 16, 2003
3:30 pm
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hodson at 3:30 pm.
II. ROLL CALL.
Present: Hodson, Thuesen, Faust, Horst, Sparks (arrived at 4:00 pm)
Absent: None
Also present: Michael Morrison, City Manager
III. PARKS COMMISSION INTERVIEWS.
Noting that there are three vacancies, all for three year terms, to be filled in 2004,
Councilmembers interviewed prospective Parks Commission members as follows:
Erich Young
Eva Knudson
After discussion, motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Horst,
to appoint Erich Young and Eva Knudson as Parks Commissioners for three year terms,
commencing in January, 2004.
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS.
Noting that there are three vacancies for three year terms, and one for a one year term, to
be filled in 2004, Councilmembers interviewed prospective Planning Commission
members as follows:
Hal Gray
James Hoska
Julianne Hunter
Jan Jenson
Victoria Young
19
After discussion, motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember
Thuesen,to appoint James Hoska,Jan Jenson, and Victoria Young as Planning
Commissioners for three year terms, and Hal Gray for a one year term, commencing in .
January, 2004.
Voting on the motion:
Aye: Hodson, Horst, Thuesen, Faust
Nay: Sparks
Motion carried.
VIII. OTHER ITEMS.
No other items were discussed.
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 5:30 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael J. Mornson
City Manager
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2®
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: January 6, 2004 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
Contractors License .
United Operations, Inc., Plymouth, MN
Heating License
Snell Mechanical Inc.,Bloomington, MN
Total Comfort Inc., Plymouth, MN
Kevin's Heating& Cooling, Inc., Hugo, MN
Community Center Rental:
St. Anthony Band Annual Garage Sale
April 26, 2004 thru May 1, 2004 - 10:00 a.m. —9:00 p.m.
Ann Coleman, Coordinator
21
December 4,2003
Dear Mike Mornson and Jay Hartman:
This letter is a request in writing to be reviewed by you regarding the use of the
community center gym. 1 have been coordinating the St..Anthony Band Annual
Garage Sale for 6 years. It has been held in Apache Plaza most recently and
unfortunately we will be needing a new venue soon, due to construction.
This request is for use of the community gym beginning Monday April 26, 2004
through Saturday morning May 1, 2004. We will be setting up and selling from
10AM — 9PM each day except Saturday. We normally clean up and distribute
unsold items to thrift agencies that morning.
This sale will also involve some unloading of items from cars and loading large
items that have been purchased. I will be using a flat bed dolly for this. Any
tables that the city could lend at this time would be appreciated. I'm hoping to
contain the whole sale in the gym, please let me know if displaying some large
items such as tables, couches or exercise equipment the day of the sale in the'
foyer would be allowed.
You can contact me with questions at 612-788-0263.
Sincerely,
Ann Coleman
22
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: January 6, 2003 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Liquor Licenses Approval:
Temporary 3.2 Beer and Wine License:
St. Charles Borromeo Mardi Gras
2727 Stinson Boulevard
Friday,February 20, 2004 7:00 p.m. — 10:30 p.m.
Sunday, February 22, 2004 7:30 a.m. —6:00 p.m.
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/22/2003 12: Check Register GL540R-VO6.56 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
008964 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 21382 12/24/03 148.52
008242 AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERV 21383 12/24/03 4,000.00
008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 21384 12/24/03 7,644.00
008450 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, 21385 12/24/03 445.75
007201 APACHE GROUP 21386 12/24/03 977.88
008909 ARCH WIRELESS 21387 12/24/03 22.14
005175 ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPAL 21388 12/24/03 90.00
008511 AT&T WIRELESS 21389 12/24/03 9.91
008255 AVAYA, INC. 21390 12/24/03 29.32
008864 BASARA/JOE 21391 12/24/03 696.16
007332 BAUER BUILT INC. 21392 12/24/03 43.10
008555 BIFFS, INC. 21393 12/24/03 596.68
00001 BLUHM/CLARE 21394 12/24/03 30.00
007253 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO 21395 12/24/03 194.17
000430 BRIGHTON AUTO ELECTRIC 21396 12/24/03 71.36
003714 BUILDING FASTENERS 21397 12/24/03 17.48
008904 BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHEN 21398 12/24/03 20.00
008652 CARTRIDGE CARE 21399 12/24/03 127.33
000610 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANS SVC 21400 12/24/03 36.18
002380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 21401 12/24/03 4,640.37
004065 CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO 21402 12/24/03 1,276.12
008577 CITY OF ST. PAUL 21403 12/24/03 64.73
000655 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMEN 21404 12/24/03 652.68
008950 COMCAST 21405 12/24/03 4.69
004107 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLN 21406 12/24/03 4,169.48
008602 CROWN TROPHY 21407 12/24/03 106.66
008966 CULVERS 21408 12/24/03 . 72.00
008130 DARE AMERICA 21409 12/24/03 227.74
000800 DAVIES WATER EQUIP CO. 21410 12/24/03 216.26
004110 DICKSON ELECTRIC 21411 12/24/03 882.00
007371 DISCOUNT STEEL, INC. 21412 12/24/03 5.62
008921 DYNAMEX 21413 12/24/03 10.80
008666 EASYLINK SERVICES CORPOR 21414. 12/24/03 101.52
00004 EMILY ARMISTEAD REM/PC 21415 12/24/03 270.00
009005 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATI 21416 12/24/03 9,963.33
008153 FILTERFRSH 21417 12/24/03 106.62
008647 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 21418 12/24/03 184.73
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 21419 12/24/03 589.85
001110 GENERAL IND SUPPLY 21420 12/24/03 53.59
001200 GOPHER BEARING 21421 12/24/03 47.03
001250 GRAINGER INC/W W 21422 12/24/03 62.09
007188 H & L MESABI INC 21423 12/24/03 1,278.64
008709 HALL/SUSAN M.H. 21424 12/24/03 69.48
008944 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT 21425 12/24/03 1,886.14
001505 HENN CO SHERIFF 21426 12/24/03 282.74
008376 HENNEPIN CNTY SHERIFF'S 21427 12/24/03 1,120.81
00002 HENNEPIN CNTY TREASURER 21428 12/24/03 50.00
008342 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 21429 12/24/03 980.31
w
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/22/2003 12: Check Register GL540R-VO6.56 PAGE 2
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
.00004 HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE 21430, 12/24/03 477.89
007326 HENRY & ASSOCIATES 21431 12/24/03 2,670.49
008699 HEWITT/JOEL 21432 12/24/03 59.02
008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 21433 12/24/03 300.69
001545 HOOVER WHEEL ALIGNMENT 21434 12/24/03 34.95
00003 HUDSON MAP 21435 12/24/03 246.05
008658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I 21436 12/24/03 76.50
00005 KAFKA/WAYNE 21437 12/24/03 20.00
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 21438 12/24/03 206.64
008167 LYNN PEAVEY CO. 21439 12/24/03 197.80
008855 MACRO GROUP, INC. 21440 12/24/03 120.00
002130 MAMA 21441 12/24/03 36.00
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC. 21442 12/24/03 1,778.64
008392 MERCURY WASTE SOLUTIONS, 21443 12/24/03 83.42
008245 METRO FIRE 21444 12/24/03 68.56
007835 METROCALL 21445 12/24/03 259.42
.00001 METROSYSTEMS 21446 12/24/03 4,546.39
008467 MIDWAY FORD 21447 12/24/03 19.70
00003 MINNESOTA GREEN EXPO 21448 12/24/03 95.00
008850 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY 21449 12/24/03 360.00
008269 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 21450 12/24/03 72.00
008545 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIP 21451 12/24/03 2,429.21
008074 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGE 21452 12/24/03 300.00
007370 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPAN 21453 12/24/03 25.42
007159 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21454 12/24/03 2.12
008326 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 21455 12/24/03 181.71
008993 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 21456 12/24/03 211.44
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 21457 12/24/03 856.25
001230 ONE CALL, CONCEPTS, INC. 21458 12/24/03 37.20
007318 OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 21459 12/24/03 956.00
007366 PARTS. MIDWEST, INC. 21460 12/24/03 10.53
008594 PETERBILT NORTH 21461 12/24/03 26.63
008369 POSTMASTER 21462 12/24/03 150.00
004492 QWEST 21463 12/24/03 246.23
008372 QWEST INTEPRISE AMERICA, 21464 12/24/03 49.95
00002 REBARFAB, INC. 21465 12/24/03 42.60
008963 REED BUSINESS INFORMATIO 21466 12/24/03 265.72
003100 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET 21467 12/24/03 226.99
003350 SEH 21468 12/24/03 3,888.51
00006 SIMONE ENGINEERING 21469 12/24/03 198.92
003490 STREICHER'S 21470 12/24/03 7.40
008757 STS CONSULTANTS LTD 21471 12/24/03 1,367.05
008502 SUPERIOR FORD INC. 21472 12/24/03 . 23,697.87
003260 T A. SCHIFSKY & SONS 21473 12/24/03 415.03
008700 TC WEB TECH 21474 12/24/03 942.00
009004 TEE'S PLUS 21475 12/24/03 1,195.23
007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 21476 12/24/03 260.73
008010 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 21477 12/24/03 650.00
N
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/22/2003 12: Check Register GL540R-V06.56 PAGE 3
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
008336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 21478 12/24/03 435.87
008561 UNITED RENTALS COMPANY 21479 12/24/03 435.58
008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 21480 12/24/03 421.03
008388 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES 21481 12/24/03 3,854.15
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 21482 12/24/03 339.62
008273 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. 21483 12/24/03 49,125.39
002680 XCEL ENERGY 21484 12/24/03 11,018.06
007325 YOCUM OIL COMPANY, INC. 21485 12/24/03 5,772.56
000830 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 21486 12/24/03 57.40
BREMER BANK NA 166,405.57 ***
N
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/30/2003 10: Check Register GL540R-VO6.56 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
008242 AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERV 21504 01/07/04 11,806.27
008474 ALCOPRO 21505 01/07/04 1,006.00
008268 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 21506 01/07/04 75.00
007253 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO 21507 01/07/04 100.66
007386 CASTLE INSPECTION, SERVIC 21508 01/07/04 6,191.35 .
000610 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANS SVC 21509 01/07/04 61.21
008577 CITY OF ST. PAUL 21510 01/07/04 32.00
00002 CLINNET SOLUTIONS LLC - 21511 01/07/04 18.00
008109 CORNER HOUSE 21512 01/07/04 855.09
.00001 DATA-LINK 21513 01/07/04 75.00
008848 DIVERSIFIED CRYOGENICS 21514 01/07/04 558.06
000820 DORSEY &WHITNEY 21515 01/07/04 415.30
000200 EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC. 21516 01/07/04 7,052.65
008942 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 21517 01/07/04 195.00
008362 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC. 21518 .01/07/04 396.00
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 21519 01/07/04 129.74
001420 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 21520 01/07/04 489.90
008625 HENN CNTY CHIEFS OF POLI 21521 01/07/04 100.00
008376 HENNEPIN CNTY SHERIFF'S 21522 01/07/04 6,897.15
008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 21523 01/07/04 63.51
001545 HOOVER WHEEL ALIGNMENT 21524 01/07/04 34.95
000742 KROEPLIN/CONNIE 21525 01/07/04 28.66
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 21526 01/07/04 299.00 '
008721 MASYS CORPORATION 21527 01/07/04 6,800.00
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC: 21528 01/07/04 96.60
007835 METROCALL 21529 01/07/04 4.19
002240 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 21530 01/07/04 33,154.33
002355 MINNESOTA GFOA 21531 01/07/04 40.00
008850 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY 21532 01/07/04 1,124.00
008856 MINNESOTA NAHRO 21533 01/07/04 20.00
005106 MN CRIME PREVENTION ASSO 21534 01/07/04 55.00
008357 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 21535 01/07/04 10.00
002395 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC 21536 01/07/04 218.67
008076 NORTHWEST YOUTH & FAM SE 21537 01/07/04 3,500.00
008594 PETERBILT NORTH 21538 01/07/04 79.43
008805 PETTY CASH - BREMER BANK 21539 01/07/04 58.94
008893 PLEAA 21540 01/07/04 10.00
007057 PRAXAIR 21541 01/07/04 24.25
008462 RAMSEY COUNTY 21542 01/07/04 121.47
00001 RICK'S ROOFING & SIDING 21543 01/07/04 1,508.00
008876 S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC 21544 01/07/04 102,826.55
003315 SL-SERCO 21545 01/07/04 1,200.00
009006 THOMAS & SON'S CONSTRUCT 21546 01/07/04 239,269.90
007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 21547 01/07/04 374.18
008449 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR 21548 01/07/04 383.17
008561 UNITED RENTALS COMPANY 21549 01/07/04 289.95
BREMER BANK NA 428,049.13 ***
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/19/2003 14: Check Register GL540R-V06.56 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 22905 12/22/03 6,490.04
002380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 22906 12/22/03 532.85
004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO., 22907 12/22/03 440.30
004120 EAGLE WINE CO 22908 12/22/03 1,316.62
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 22909 12/22/03 8,744.20
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC. 22910 12/22/03 411.00
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 22911 12/22/03 22,449.89
004207 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 22912 12/22/03 723.45
004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 22913 12/22/03 14,034.82
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 22914 12/22/03 10,760.50
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 22915 12/22/03 11,903.00
004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 22916 12/22/03 1,150.86
004360 PHILLIPS WINE 4 SPIRITS 22917 12/22/03 15,756.28
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 22918 12/22/03 1,283.39
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 22919 12/22/03 3,568.13
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 22920 12/22/03 11,036.28
008903 U.S. BANK 22921 12/22/03 79,293.75
008316 WINE COMPANY/THE 22922 12/22/03 97.67
008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 22923 12/22/03 2,015.02
002680 RCEL ENERGY 22924 12/22/03 1,060.80
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 193,068.85 ***
y
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/30/2003 10: Check Register GL540R-VO6.56 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008964 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 22936 01/07/04 39.38
008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 22937 01/07/04 289.00
008511 AT&T WIRELESS 22938 01/07/04 43.21
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 22939 01/07/04 5,041.19
004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO., 22940 01/07/04 564.00
004095 COCA COLA BOTTLING 22941 01/07/04 545.45
.00001 DIVINE WINE DISTRIBUTORS 22942 01/07/04 85.20
008557 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 22943 01/07/04 120.08
004120 EAGLE WINE CO 22944 01/07/04 2,838.51
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 22945 01/07/04 11,744.65
008697 EXTREME BEVERAGE 22946 01/07/04 256.00
008359 FT-All ERTYIS HAPPY TYME CO 22947 01/07/04 294.00
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 22948 01/07/04 148.28
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC. 22949 01/07/04 440.00
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 22950 01/07/04 8,939.97
004207 HOHENSTEIN-S, INC 22951 01/07/04 637.05
004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 22952 01/07/04 27,298.45
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 22953 01/07/04 17,991.75
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 22954 01/07/04 557.00
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 22955 01/07/04 4,192.25
004263 MARKET AMERICA CORP. 22956 01/07/04 325.00
008494 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL 22957 01/07/04 53.25
008881 MINNESOTA WINEGROWERS 22958 01/07/04 69.20
008883 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 22959 01/07/04 81.00
004334 NORTHEASTER 22960 01/07/04 595.00
004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 22961 01/07/04 1,139.00
004360 PHILLIPS WINE &SPIRITS 22962 01/07/04 7,117.78
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 22963 01/07/04 1,227.51
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 22964 01/07/04 2,056.24
008787 PROMOTIONAL PAGES, INC. 22965 01/07/04 6.45
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 22966 01/07/04 8,181.83
008219 QWEST DEX 22967 01/07/04 420.80
008470 SUN NEWSPAPERS 22968 01/07/04 1,500.00
008888 VALPAK OF MINNEAPOLIS-ST 22969 01/07/04 1,625.00
008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 22970 01/07/04 419.76
004499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC. 22971 01/07/04 261.00
003840 ZEP MFG COMPANY 22972 01/07/04 94.12
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 107,238.36 ***
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/30/2003 11: Check Register GL540R-V06.56 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT w'
008986 YELLOW BOOK USA 22898 12/31/03 564.00
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 564.00 ++*
29
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION '.' th e CJ'
ilia
Report Date: December 21, 2003
Meeting Date: January 6, 2004 Agenda Section: IV, D. 1 - 10
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Housekeeping resolutions for first Council meeting in January,
2004
MANAGER'S REVIEW:
Attached are Resolutions 04-001 - 04-010 (aka the Housekeeping Resolutions).
Resolutions 005 - 009 list the outside organizations held by each of you in 2003.
Resolution 010 approves the "Standing Rules for Conducting City Council Meetings".
Please note the proposed change on page 5 of the Rules, under"Mayor Pro Tem", that
office is appointed annually. Members of the current Council have served as Mayor Pro
Tern as follows:
2000 Thuesen
2001 Horst
2002 Sparks
2003 Faust
Following the Rules, future appointments would be:
2004 Thuesen
2005 Stille
2006 Horst
2007 Faust
Michael Morrison
City Manager
30
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-001
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ACTING MAYOR
FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2004
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates
Councilmember Thuesen as Acting Mayor for the year 2004.
Adopted this day of
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
31
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-002
A RESOLUTION SPECIFYING PERSONS AUTHORIZED
TO MAKE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS REGARDING
CITY FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby specifies the Mayor
(Randy Hodson), City Manager(Michael J. Mornson), and Finance Director(Roger A. Larson,
Sr.)to make approved transfers and deposits and approved transactions of City funds in the
various City accounts and that their names are to appear on signature cards at various financial
institutions approved by the City.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
32
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-003
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL
DEPOSITORY FOR CITY FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates the
Bremer Bank of St. Anthony as a depository for the funds of the City and that.said bank shall
also be the bank for this City with respect to any/all other banking services required or used by
this City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this notice shall continue in force until December 31, 2004,
or until written notice of its recision or modification has been received by said bank.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said bank deposit such securities in the amount and in the
manner required by law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Finance Director be authorized to accept such securities
as collateral as required by law, and that said collateral be held at the Bremer Bank of St.
Anthony for safekeeping.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall transmit to the Bremer Bank of St.
Anthony a copy of this resolution.
Adopted this day of 22004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
33
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-004
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING LEGAL NEWSPAPER
FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2004
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates Lillie
Suburban Newspapers, Inc. (St. Anthony Bulletin), a legal newspaper of general circulation in
the City, as the official newspaper of the City for 2004 in which shall be published such measures
and matters as are by-laws of this State and City Code required to.be published; and such other
matters as the Council may deem advisable and in the public interest to have published.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
Ulfie Suburban Newspapers, Inc. ,34
2515 E. Seventh Avenue
North St. Paul, MN 55109
(651)777-8800
December 15, 200
Connie Kroeplin
City Clerk
St. Anthony City Offices
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Dear Ms Kroeplin:
Thank you for the opportunity to bid on public notice publication services for the City of St.
Anthony. The Bulletin has been serving the needs of the St. Anthony area for 28 years, and is pleased
to provide ongoing coverage of city government and school issues and community events.
Lillie Suburban Newspapers is the oldest weekly newspaper company in the St. Paul area. It was
founded in 1938 by the late T. R. Lillie. His son, N. Theodore Lillie, and grandson, Jeffery Enright.
are continuing the family tradition of publishing award-winning community newspapers in the St.
Paul suburbs.
It is our sincere desire to provide the best possible local news coverage in the St. Anthony area.
Our experienced news staff provides readers with a well-balanced, lively and informative product each
:week. We realize that St. Anthony area residents look to the St. Anthony Bulletin as one of their
primary sources of information about city activities and meetings, and we will continue to publish the
city's press releases and photos.
Lillie Suburban Newspapers has the official designation of the neighboring communities of Arden
Hills and New Brighton, along with Mounds View School District 621.
Noon Friday is the deadline each week for submitting public notices to our office. Late public
notices are accepted up to 10 a.m. Monday for the Wednesday newspaper. Public notices should be
directed to Brenda Boogren, Lillie Suburban Newspapers, 2515 E. Seventh Avenue, North St. Paul.
MN 55109. Our fax number is 651/777-8288. Notices may also be sent via e-mail to
lillienews @aol.com
Legal publication rates for minutes, advertisements for bids and other notices are as follows:
$4.65 per column inch for a one-time publication
$3.65 per column inch for each additional publication
Thank you for considering the St. Anthony Bulletin as the official legal newspaper for the City of
St. Anthony for 2004. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to call us.
Sincerely,
?Jeffe�ryright
Publisher
WiE Ramsey County Review ❖Maplewood Review Oakdale-Lake Elmo Review :
Review Perspectives
NEWS New Brighton Bulletin e0- Shoreview Bulletin ❖ St. Anthony Bulletin dr South-West Review
Roseville-Little Canada Review ❖ Woodbury-South Maplewood Review❖ East Side Review
35
apers
newsp
December 16, 2003
City of St. Anthony Village
Mike Mornson, City Manager
3301 Silver Lake Rd.
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Dear Mr. Mornson:
The Sun-Focus would like to be considered for desi n '
St. Anthony Village for the year 2004. 9 anon as the legal newspaper for the City of
All published legal notices are posted on our website (www.mnSun.c
This is an enhancement to the local news coverage already available
broaden the readership of your legal notice °m) at no additional charge.
on
s. the Internet'and will
One of the main benefits of publishin g your legal notices with the Sun-Focus
is our home delivery.
y
Sun Newspapers has become the primary source of communit ne ws in the suburbs.Your notices
in our paper have the best chance of being seen and read.
Despite rising costs of operating our newspapers, there will be
Year 2004. Our legal prices will remain the same.
no rate increase during the calendar
The rate structure for legals effective January 1, 2004 will be:
1 column width: $ .45 per line - insertion
There are 10 lines per inch ($4.95 per col. inch)
Our columns are 11 picas 10 points wide
Two notarized affidavits on each of your publications will be provided
The deadline for regular length notices is 11:00 am the Monday prior
legal notices is an efficient and accurate .way of getting p ed with no additional charge.
legal department is legals@mnsunpub.com. We still accept p to publicatiori. E=mailing the
g the notices to us. The e-mail address for the
mail. If you require more information to make your decision, please cont
our Legal Representative, at 952-392.6829 pt notices on disk, faxed or through the
act me or Meridel Hedblom,
Thank you for considering the Sun-Focus as the official newspaper
for your community.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Coolman
Vice President of Sales and General Manaqer PPARM
0917 VALL_Ey Vjgw ROAD ®EDEN
® MNNESOTA 5534. ® 952-829-0797
Fes: 952-941-3588
36
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-005
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING MAYOR RANDY HODSON
AS A PARTICIPANT IN OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS.
BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates Mayor
Randy Hodson as a participant in the following outside organizations:
Chamber of Commerce
Alternate to Northwest Suburban Cable Commission
Adopted this day of 92004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
37
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-006
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COUNCILMEMBER BRIAN THUESEN
AS A PARTICIPANT IN OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS
BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates
Councilmember Brian Thuesen as a participant in the following outside organizations:
Northwest Youth&Family Services
Friends of the Library
St. Anthony Orchestra
Planning Commission Liaison
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
38
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-007
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COUNCILMEMBER RICHARD HORST
AS A PARTICIPANT IN OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS
BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates
Councilmember Richard Horst as a participant in the following outside organizations:
Community Services Advisory Council
Alternate to-Middle Mississippi Watershed District
VillageFest
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
39
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-008
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COUNCILMEMBER RANDY STILLE
AS A PARTICIPANT IN OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates
Councilmember Randy Stille as a participant in the following outside organizations:
Parks Commission Council Liaison
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
4®
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-009
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COUNCILMEMBER JERRY FAUST
AS A PARTICIPANT IN OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS
BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby designates
Councilmember Jerry Faust as a participant in the following outside organizations:
League of Minnesota Cities
Middle Mississippi Watershed District
Sister City
Chamber of Commerce
Northeast Diagonal Use/Transit Policy Advisory Committee
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
41
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-010
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE STANDING RULES
OF CONDUCT FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
FOR THE YEAR 2004
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby adopts the City
Council Standing Rules 2004 for conducting City Council meetings during the year 2004 which
said rules are attached herewith.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
42
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2004
STANDING RULES FOR CONDUCTING
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
INTRODUCTION
In the belief that the best decisions are made by the best informed decision makers and
that the public decision process is best served when the public has every opportunity to
present views, the following rules are established to govern regular and special Council
meetings as well as formal public hearings. There are several goals behind these rules.
In general, free and open discussion by all interested parties should be an
essential part of the decision-making process.
The Council process should have as little procedural overhead as possible.
Time is better spent on substantial matters rather than performa matters.
MEMBERSHIP
The formal Council membership consists of the four Councilmembers and the Mayor. All
five have one vote each and all five can introduce motions. For purposes of leading the
meeting, the Mayor, or in the absence of the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tem, will be
considered the Chairperson. A quorum of the Council is three members. A quorum is
required to do official business.
Meetings of the Council shall be held at City Hall on the second and fourth Tuesday of
each month at 7:00 pm. Council work sessions will be called from time to time, as the
Mayor and Council deem necessary.
RULES
Order of Business
The following shall be the order of business of the Council:
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM - Individuals may address the City Council about any item
43
COMMUNITY FORUM - Individuals may address the City Council about any item
not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium,
state their name and address for the secretary's record, and limit their remarks to
five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items
discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report
or direct that the matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and will a enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
COMMISSIONS AND STAFF REPORTS
GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL
REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS AND CITY MANAGER
INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
A_ eg nda
To be considered, an item must be on the agenda and the agenda must be distributed to
all the Councilmembers and any other persons having responsibility for an item at least
three working days prior to the meeting. An agenda can be modified with addenda by a
majority vote but this should be used only for minor items or items with extreme time
constraints.
An item can be moved from the consent agenda to the action agenda at the request of any
Councilmember.
Since there will be audience and cable TV viewers not familiar with each item, the Mayor
will give a brief explanation of each item as it is addressed.
The order of items on the agenda need not be followed absolutely. The Mayor may adjust
the order in the interest of:
• Filling in time before a scheduled item, i.e., a public hearing.
• Grouping several items to best make use of consultant time.
• Accommodating individuals who have attended the meeting specifically to provide
input on an item.
-2-
44
Process - Regular and Special Council Meetings
For these proceedings the Council will use the "open discussion" procedure. That is,
discussion is open to any member before or after a motion is made. This privilege is also
extended to the City Manager, and any of the consultants who may have an interest in or
can contribute to the item at hand.
The Mayor can make liberal use of the "unanimous consent" procedure. That is, items that
in the judgement of the Mayor are likely to be unanimously approved can be introduced for
approval with the statement: "If there are no objections..........stands approved (or
denied)." If any Council member has an objection, the item reverts to the standard motion
procedure. This "unanimous consent" procedure cannot be used for items requiring formal
votes, i.e., resolutions or for approval of the consent agenda.
The standard motion procedure is that each motion requires a second. This also applies to
amendments. Any motion, by any member, shall be reduced to writing upon request of
any member. No motion shall be put to a vote until it has been stated by the recorder at
the request of any member of the Council.
To eliminate confusion, only one amendment will be considered at a time and that
amendment must be germane to the motion. An amendment cannot itself be amended. If
a change to an amendment is deemed appropriate, the amendment should be withdrawn
and reintroduced accordingly.
The general mode of voting will be by acclamation but with enough clarity that the
individual votes can be recorded in the minutes. If in doubt, the clerk can request
clarification. Each individual's vote will be entered in the minutes.
Any member may abstain from voting or disqualify himself/herself. The reason for
disqualification or abstention must be stated by the member and entered into the minutes.
If a member disqualifies himself/herself, he/she may leave the room while the issue is
being considered.
Roberts Rules of Order (Revised) shall govern the Council procedures not covered by the
Standing Rules of the Council.
The meeting will be video taped and the tape will be retained for 3 months following
approval of the minutes of the meeting. The standard retention can be extended if in the
judgement of the Mayor, City Manager, City Clerk or any Councilmember, such action is
warranted.
If the Council action is the result of a resident request and that request is denied in whole
or in part, reasons of the fact supporting the denial will be made part of the public record.
-3-
45
Process - Public Hearin-gs
Since a public hearing is a more formal procedure and often requires certain procedures
and actions to be legal, the meeting rules are changed accordingly.
The primary aim of a public hearing is to take input from the public. To accomplish this in
the most effective manner, the Mayor will introduce the hearing with an explanation of the
issues. The Mayor will give this explanation or a person designated by the Mayor. The use
of explanatory visual aids is encouraged.
Following the explanation, input from the public will be taken. Prior to accepting input,
though, the Mayor will state the areas where input will be appropriate, the maximum time
to be allotted to any individual presenter and any other procedural rules deemed
appropriate to guarantee that all concerned parties have a fair and adequate opportunity to
be heard.
All individuals wishing to speak must fill out and submit identification form and speak into
a recording microphone. Individuals not wishing to speak in public may provide a written
statement. The Council may take up to 15 minutes to review written statements presented
at the meeting. If the Council decides not to act on the issue at the public hearing meeting,
it may by majority vote extend the time where written input will be taken to a day not later
than 1 week before the next meeting where a deciding vote is planned.
All speakers are expected to be business-like, to-the-point and courteous. Anyone not
abiding by these rules will be considered to be out of order.
The Council will refrain from initiating a discussion during the pubic input phase of the
hearing except to clarify points brought up.
Once the public testimony phase is complete, the Mayor will announce the public hearing
to be closed and the Council will revert back to its open discussion mode of operation.
From this point on, public input will only be appropriate when solicited by the Council.
It shall be the intent of the Council to vote on the issue at the same meeting as the public
hearing and as close in time to the public hearing as possible. Should it be necessary to
defer voting until a later date, the procedure will be clearly explained to the audience.
If the motion contains conditions, as may occur in conditional use or variance requests,
those conditions will be conveyed in writing to the requestor.
If the public hearing is the result of a resident request and that request is denied in whole
or in part, reasons of fact supporting the denial will be made part of the public record.
If the public hearing is to set an assessment rate, the assessment formula(s) under
discussion cannot be altered. This implies that the Council has fully discussed any
formulas prior to the hearing and that the appropriate legal, fiscal and engineering
consultants have passed on formula(s) viability, legality, and feasibility.
-4-
46
If the hearing is to set an assessment, it cannot be scheduled later than the first meeting in
September. This is to allow time to correct errors prior to the time needed to certify the
rolls to the county.
MAYOR PRO TEM*
The Mayor Pro Tem shall be appointed in January of each year. The first Mayor Pro Tem
after adoption of this rule shall be the Councilmember with the most continuous time on
the Council. The position shall then be rotated among Councilmembers based on time of
continuous service. If two or more members have identical seniority, the appointment shall
be based on alphabetical order by last name. A Councilmember may not serve as Mayor
Pro Tem twice until all other Councilmembers have been Mayor Pro Tem. A
Councilmember must serve one vear before being considered for Ma or Pro Tem.
A Councilmember may decline the appointment for good cause and maintain his/her place
in the rotation for appointment the following year.
ADOPTION/MODI FICATION/SUSPENSION
These rules can be adopted, modified or suspended in whole or in part by a majority vote
of the Council. If suspended, they are automatically reinstated at the next meeting.
ANNUAL REVIEW
These rules will be reviewed annually at the first meeting in January.
INTERPRETATION
The Mayor will interpret the rules. However, the Mayor's interpretation can be appealed by
any Councilmember and can be overruled by a majority vote.
-5-
47
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION CJ"`n tho
ills e C�
Report Date: December 21, 2003
Meeting Date: January 6, 2004 Agenda Section: IV, E
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fannie Mae Funding
MANAGER'S REVIEW: The City Council, by approving Resolution 04-016, agrees to
enter into an agreement with Fannie Mae for loan funds to be used by the City to assist
in acquiring commercial property in the Northwest Quadrant area. The proceeds to pay
the loan back will come from the developer when the "For Sale" housing gets sold and
from the future increment, if needed. We will not close on the loan until the developer
has 20% of the "For Sale" housing pre-sold.
This is funding needed by the developer to assist in the redevelopment of the
Northwest Quadrant. We are anticipating closing on the loan on or before May 31,
2004. The term of the loan is 3 years, however, we can get a three year extension, if
needed.
This resolution was approved by the HRA on November 25, 2003. Fannie Mae is asking
that the City Council approve the same resolution.
Michael Mornson
City Manager
48
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04 - 016
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT/
APACHE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT, APPROVING A LOAN
FOR PROPERTY ACQUISITION
WHEREAS, funds were sought to assist the developer for the Northwest Quadrant area to acquire
commercial property; and
WHEREAS, to that end, Fannie Mae has approved a$3,350,000 non-revolving line of credit(the
"Loan") to the City of St. Anthony Village; and
WHEREAS, the terms upon which Fannie Mae is prepared to make available the Loan are set forth on
the Term Sheet attached hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
approves an agreement with Fannie Mae for a loan to be used to assist in acquiring commercial property
in the Northwest Quadrant area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the
terms regarding said loan, as set forth on the Term Sheet attached hereto.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and empowered at any
time and from time to time hereafter in the name and on behalf of the City to execute, deliver and furnish
to Fannie Mae all promissory notes, assignments, loan agreements,pledge agreements, and any other
instruments, documents, certificates or agreements to be executed, delivered and/or furnished under or in
connection with the Loan or as may now or hereafter be required by Fannie Mae to evidence and/or
secure the obligations of the City to Fannie Mae under or in connection with the Loan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City is authorized to establish a collateral account at a financial
institution on the amount of$837,500 and grant to Fannie Mae a continuing first priority security interest
in and to such collateral account.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
Page 2 of 3
49
City of St. Anthony Village,Minnesota
Line of Credit
October 2003
City: City of St.Anthony Village ("City")
Rating of City: Long-term General Obligation Bonds Rated"Al"by Moody's Investment
Services ("Moody's") on 09/18/03
Type of Financing: Non-revolving line of credit ("Loan")
Loan Amount: $3,350,000
Maturity: 36 months;no advances during the final six months of the Loan.
Tax Status: Taxable
Use of Proceeds: The City will use the proceeds of the Loan to acquire property for the
Apache Plaza/Northwest Quadrant Redevelopment
Projects Eligible
For Funding: All funds will be used for costs and expenses incurred in connection with the
acquisition of property in the Apache Plaza/Northwest Quadrant
Redevelopment Area to be used for the development of for-sale townhomes
and flats; Closing costs associated with the Loan are also eligible uses.
Interest Rate: Variable interest rate based on.3 month LIBOR(as published in The mall
Street Journa� + 175 basis points. The initial interest rate will be set on the
closing date.
Interest Rate Reset: Interest rate will be reset quarterly on the first day of each calendar quarter
Qanuary 1,April 1,July 1,and October 1).
Interest Payment: Quarterly payments of interest to be paid in arrears on the first day of each
calendar quarter and calculated on an actual/360 basis.
"This term sheet Is provided solely as a basis for discussion and is subject to change;it should
not be construed as a binding commitment,but merely presented for review and consideration."
Page 2 of 3 50
Principal Payment: . Principal repayment will occur with the issuance of tax increment.bonds on
or before Spring 2007. In no event shall the repayment date of any advance
exceed the maturity date of the Loan.
Draw Period
Expiration: Six months prior to Loan Maturity.
Prepayment: Prepayment may occur at any time.
Security/ Recourse: Full recourse to the City's assets.
Collateral: $837;500 (25% of the Loan amount).
Loan Covenants: No Fannie Mae Foundation grants,loans or investments may be used by the
City to repay or facilitate the repayment of the Loan.
The City will make timely payments.of principal and interest.
The City will obey and comply with all laws, ordinances and regulations that
may adversely affect its corporate existence or that may ordered by a court
or other governmental body.
The City will pay all of its debt obligations in accordance with the te=ns set
forth in those obligations.
The City will notify Fannie Mae in writing of any event of default within
three days after obtaining knowledge of the event.
Within thirty daps of the commencement of a lawsuit that may materially
impact the City, the City will notify Fannie Mae in writing of the suit.
The City will provide such information as Fannie Mae may request with
reasonable promptness.
The City will maintain proper books and records.
The City will maintain a rating of Al from Moody's for its Long-Term
General Obligation debt throughout the term of this Loan. If the General
Obligation rating from Moody's is reduced to A2,then the interest rate on
the Loan shall be increased by 25 basis points. If the General Obligation
rating from Moody's is reduced to A3,the Loan shall become due and
payable.
Legal Fees: All legal fees to be paid by the City at closing. Legal fees shall be paid
whether or not the Loan closes.
Origination Fee: 100 basis points of the Loan amount, due and payable at closing.
**This term sheet is provided solely as a basis for discussion and is subject to change;It should
not be construed as a binding commitment,but merely presented for review and consideration.'*
Page 3 of 3 51
Standby Fee: The City shall pay a standby fee (the "Standby Fee") to Fannie Mae on the
"Undrawn Portion" of the Loan, which is an amount equal to the Loan less
the outstanding unpaid principal balance of the promissory note evidencing
the Loan at the time of calculation. The Standby Fee shall be an amount,per
annum, equal to fifteen (15) basis points calculated on the Undrawn Portion,
and shall be calculated each month on the Undrawn Portion and payable
quarterly.
Reporting
Requirements: Within one hundred eighty days (180) of the end of the fiscal year, City must
submit audited Financial Statements for the fiscal year.
Within 30 days (30) of the date it is due, City will submit its annual tax
increment financing report required by the State of Minnesota.
City will forward any report it receives from the developers of the property it
acquires with the proceeds of the Loan within 30 days (30) of receipt thereof.
**This term sheet is provided solely as a basis for discussion and is subject to change;it should
not be construed as a binding commitment,but merely presented for review and consideration.**
52
Minnesota Partnershi
386 Wabasha Street N
to'1100i"I,, Fa n Me M a e Suite 1026
Saint Paul,MN 55102
651 726 0900
651 726 0926(fax)
October 20,2003
Michael Morrison
City Manager
3301 Silver Lake Road
St.Anthony,Minnesota 55418-1699
Re: $3,350,000 Loan to City of St.Anthony Village
Dear Mr.Morrison:
We are pleased to inform you that Fannie Mae has conditionally approved a $3,350,000 non-revolving line of credit (the
"Loan"), the proceeds of which will be used to fund the acquisition of property pursuant to the terms of the documents
evidencing the Loan. The terms upon which Fannie Mae is prepared to make available the Loan are set forth on the term
sheet attached hereto.
The closing of the Loan must take place on or before May 31,2004. If the closing does not occur on or before such date,the
terms set forth on the term sheet may be revoked by Fannie Mae without additional notice. Upon receipt of a copy of this
letter counter-signed by you,we will instruct outside counsel to prepare the necessary loan documents for this transaction.
Your signature indicates you agree to pay Fannie Mae's legal fees in connection-with the Loan whether or not the Loan
actually closes. Fannie Mae's obligation to enter into the Loan is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence,full
execution of the loan documents in form and substance acceptable to Fannie Mae on or before May 31,2004, and satisfaction
of any conditions set forth in the attached term sheet. Additional conditions may need to be satisfied as required by Fannie
Mae counsel. Please be advised that no agreement shall be binding as to Fannie Mae unless and until the parties execute a
formal written agreement.
We look forward to working with you. So that we may begin to prepare the necessary documentation for this transaction,
kindly sign below and return the counter-signed copy of this letter within 45 days of the date hereof to the undersigned by fax
(651-726-0926)and regular-or overnight mail.
Should you have any questions or if you would like to discuss any items set forth herein, please feel free to contact Katy
Lindblad at 651-726-09.19.
Sincerely,
Cindy M.Holler Katy Sears Lindblad
Community Development Director Community Development Manager
Agreed:
By:
cc: Missy Thompson
Tammy Melander
Stacie Kvilvang
Roger Larson
DRAFT 53
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING _
4
5 December 16, 2003
6 7:00 p.m.
7
8 I. CALL TO ORDER.
9 Chair Melsha called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
10
11 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
12 Chair Melsha invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
13
14 III. ROLL CALL.
15 Commissioners present: Chair Melsha; Vice Chair Stille, Commissioners Hanson,
16 Hoska, Steeves, Stromgren, and Tillman.
17 Absent: None.
18 Also present: Assistant City Manager Susan Hall.
19
20 IV. PUBLIC INPUT.
21 Hearing no comments, Chair Melsha moved forward with the agenda.
22
23 V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
24 Chair Melsha indicated that a concept review regarding Ali's Mini Mart located at 3259 Stinson
25 had been added to the agenda.
26
27 Motion by Commissioner Tillman, second by Commissioner Hoska, to approve the meeting
28 agenda with the change above.
29
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31
32 VI. MEETING MINUTES.
33 6.1 Review and Approval Planning Commission Minutes of November 18, 2003.
34
35 Motion by Commissioner Stille, second by Commissioner Tillman,to approve the Planning
36 Commission meeting minutes of November 18, 2003.
37
38 Motion carried unanimously.
39
40 VII. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL.
41 7.1 Designate a Planning Commission member to the January 6, 2004 City Council
42 Meeting.
43
44 Chair Melsha indicated that he would attend the next City Council meeting on January 6, 2004.
45
46 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
47 8.1 Rod Rabine, 2800 34`''Avenue NE,Request for addition to front of home: (a) lot
48 coverage variance: and, (b) front yard setback variance.
54
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
December 16, 2003
Page 2
1 Rod Rabine, 2800 34`h Avenue NE, is requesting two variances to complete an addition to
2 the front of his home. She explained that the first variance request is for lot coverage; the
3 proposed addition exceeds the allowable maximum of 35 percent in the R-1 single-family
4 zoning district by 2 percent. According to the petitioner, the project will put the total lot
5 coverage over by approximately 220 square feet. With the proposed addition, the lot
6 coverage would measure 3,895 square feet and the lot measures 10,500 square feet, for a
7 total of 37 percent lot coverage.
8
9 Ms. Hall explained that the second variance request is for the front yard setback because
10 the proposed addition would encroach into the front yard by ten feet. In the R-1 single-
11 family zoning district, the front yard must have a depth equal to the greater of 30 feet or a
12 distance equal to the average of the front yard depths of the two adjacent lots. Given this
13 formula, staff went to the subject property to measure the adjacent two lots. Staff found
14 that the east property(2804 34"'Avenue NE) measures 30 feet from curb to home and the
15 west property(2712 34`h Avenue NE) measures 35 feet from curb to home. An average of
16 the two adjacent lots is 33 feet; therefore, the subject property should have this depth at a
17 minimum. The petitioner is proposing to extend 10 feet out from the current front of
18 home, or a 10-foot variance request,which would leave a 23-foot front yard setback.
19
20 Ms. Hall further explained that the petitioner is requesting two variances be granted for a
21 240 square foot addition to the front of his home. The addition includes a handicap
22 accessible front entry and a handicap bathroom on the main floor. The petitioner explains
23 the hardship is his mother who stays with his family on occasion; she is in need of the
24 handicap accessible entry and bathroom. While the petitioner's application contains
25 front yard measurements on a hand drawing, staff verified the subject property in relation
26 to the neighboring lots, because of the formula for the front yard setback in the zoning
27 code. The measurements on the hand drawing are not reflective of staff's interpretation;
28 however, the petitioner is in agreement with city staff at this point.
29
30 Mr. Rabine provided a drawing of the proposed addition and reviewed it with the
31 Commission.
32
33 Chair Melsha asked if the proposed bathroom would be located where an existing
34 bedroom is located.
35
36 Mr. Rabine indicated that it would be and then said that they would be using
37 approximately eight(8) feet for the handicapped accessible shower and toilet. Mr.
38 Rabine indicated his main concern is to be able to provide handicapped accessibility to
39 his home to allow his elderly parents to stay with him for extended stays and, should his
40 father pass away, his mother would live with them.
41
42 Commissioner Tillman asked if Mr. Rabine had considered adding onto the rear of the
43 home.
44
45 Mr. Rabine indicated that all the plumbing is in that location and he was attempting to
46 keep costs down by making the construction as easy as possible.
47
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 55
December 16, 2003
Page 3
1 Commissioner Tillman suggested adding the bedroom out the back of the home.
2
3 Chair Melsha asked if Mr. Rabine had considered putting bedroom on the back and
4 leaving the proposed bathroom in front to be easily accessible to the existing plumbing.
5
6 Mr. Rabine indicated he could consider it but said he would still need the lot coverage
7 variance. He then said that he understood the ordinance but thought he was asking for
8 only five (5) feet and has found he is asking for(10) feet.
9
10 Mr. Rabine indicated he had talked to one of his neighbors who has a garage on the side
11 and they are not concerned about the proposal.
12 °
13 Chair Melsha commented that the property is unique as it does not have an attached
14 garage and the driveway is quite long to extend to the back of the property where the
15 garage is located. This,he feels, constitutes a hardship when it comes to figuring in lot
16 coverage. He further commented that the Commission has found hardship for other
17 homes with garages set back on the property.
18
19 Commissioner Hoska indicated there was a pine tree in the front and asked whether that
20 would be left.
21
22 Mr. Rabine indicated the tree would stay.
23
24 Mr. Hoska commented that the tree may break up the space a little bit and make the 10
25 foot variance not so big.
26
27 Mr. Rabin indicated there is a large tree in the middle of the back yard and it would
28 harm the roots of the tree to dig back there but he needs to make this accommodation for
29 his parents so he would be open to exploring the option of expanding out the back.
30
31 Commissioner Stromgren asked whether the drawing showed an all new roof structure.
32
33 Mr. Rabine indicated the roof structure would be new from the peak.
34
35 Marilyn Jetnik of 2712 34`h Avenue indicated she was aware that the addition was in the
36 works but she does have issues with it. She then said that she had contacted Staff to
37 discuss the lot coverage variance request. She further commented that the home is over
38 2000 square feet on the main floor and the lot is small so she is concerned with the lot
39 coverage.
40
41 Ms. Jetnik indicated that she has lived in St. Anthony for a long time and there are water
42 issues that the City has been working on and she is concerned that she is down grade
43 from this home and is worried that the runoff will flow to her property causing her
44 problems.
45
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 56
December 16, 2003
Page 4
1 Ms. Jetnik indicated her second issue is that when the homes were built originally people
2 were able to pick their address with no rhyme or reason so she is 2712 and they are at
3 2800 right next door which makes it hard for people attempting to locate her home. She
4 then commented that the proposal would put their house out in front of hers and anyone
5 coming down the street would not be able to see her home.
6
7 Ms. Jetnik in that the addition out the front of this home would destroy the view
8 of her home from the street as a person travels down. She then said that there are other
9 alternatives and asked that the Commission consider her concerns as she feels this is too
10 much of a variance to grant.
11
12 Commissioner Hoska asked if there would be room to add on out the back and stay away
13 from the existing tree in the back.
14
15 Mr. Rabine indicated that the tree was approximately 15 feet from the home.
16
17 Chair Melsha closed the public hearing at 7:22 p.m.
18
19 Chair Melsha indicated that he felt the lot coverage variance could be supported due to
20 the uniqueness of the property because of the long driveway and garage that is set back
21 on the property.
22
23 Commissioner Stromgren indicated that the ramp, if made from pervious material,would
24 not have to be counted toward lot coverage.
25
26 Commissioner Tillman indicated that she was not concerned with the lot coverage as the
27 ordinance was recently changed to accommodate smaller lots to up to 40% lot coverage
28 and this would be 36 or 37%.
29
30 Commissioner Tillman indicated she is a little concerned about the front yard variance as
31 she is not certain that the criteria can be met because it is possible to go out the back or
32 add a second level.
33
34 Commissioner Steeves commented that the most essential setback is the front setback
35 from the street as that is what gives the street its look. He further commented that going
36 this distance forward of the other homes on the street would change the way the street
37 looks and he would not support it. He then said that it seems there would be a way to add
38 the bedroom off the back and have the bathroom in the front near the existing plumbing.
39
40 Commissioner Stromgren indicated that the Commission needed to consider future
41 neighbors not just those living next door now as well as whether the addition would
42 adversely impact the value of the neighboring property. He then commented that there
43 are other options for accommodating the additional bedroom such as moving the
44 applicant's son downstairs to allow the elderly parents to remain on the main level or
45 adding a bedroom off the back. He further commented that he sympathized with the
46 applicant but feels there are other options to accomplish the goal.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 57
December 16, 2003
Page 5
1 Commissioner Hanson indicated he had issues with the front yard setback for the same
2 reasons.
3
4 Commissioner Hoska indicated he could go five feet but feels the 10 feet is too far and
5 the homes should remain consistent with the neighboring homes. He then said that it
6 may be possible to reconfigure the addition to allow for an expansion out the back and
7 still have the bathroom located next to the.bedroom.
8
9 Motion by Chair Melsha, second by Commissioner S tee ves,to recommend approval of
10 the request of Rod Rabine for a 220 square foot addition to the home at 2800 34`h Avenue
11 NE,resulting in a 2% lot coverage variance based on the rationale that strict enforcement
12 of the Code would cause undue hardship as the property cannot be put to reasonable use
13 without a variance because the driveway covers an unusual amount of property which is a
14 condition that preexisted the enactment of the Zoning Code.
15
16 Motion carried with one abstention.
17
18 Vice Chair Stille did not vote on this matter.
19
20 Motion by Commissioner Stromgren, second by Commissioner Hanson to recommend denial of
21 the front-yard setback variance based on the rationale that the variance would alter the character
22 of the surrounding properties and the neighborhood.
23
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25
26 Chair Melsha indicated he would be attending the January 6, 2004 Council meeting where this
27 recommendation would be considered. He then recommended that the applicant consider
28 alternative plans and have them available at that meeting.
29
30 Mr. Rabine asked whether there were any issues with the ramp in front of the home.
31
32 The Commission indicated there were no issues with the ramp.
33
34 Mr. Rabine asked whether he could proceed if the alternate plan did not require a variance.
35
36 Chair Melsha indicated the City Council still needed to approve the lot coverage variance.
37
38 IX. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION.
39 9.1 Concept Review Proposed Expansion of Mini Mart
40
41 Susan Hall indicated that this is a review and discussion on the concept plan for Ali's Mini Mart,
42 3259 Stinson Boulevard. With the proposed plan, the petitioner has filed conditional use permit
43 and variance applications. Griffin Contracting filed the applications for Ali Shanna earlier this
44 month. The public hearing will be held at the January 20,2004 Planning Commission meeting.
45
46 Ms. Hall indicated that the petitioner is looking to add pump islands and extend the canopy,
47 which will double the area for pumping. With the proposed plans, the petitioner has filed a
58
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
December 16, 2003
Page 6
1 variance application for the parking requirement, as their plans do not show enough parking.
2 The City's commercial zoning code requires 9.8, or 10,parking spaces for the site,which is one
3 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area,which is 2960 square feet. The petitioner's plan
4 shows five spots,plus two specifically designated as employee parking. City ordinance does not
5 specify for whom the parking spaces are designated. The petitioner has commented that there
6 are 8 parking positions at the islands. Staff has relayed to them that those spots would not count
7 toward the required 10 parking spaces.
8
9 Ms. Hall indicated that, according to City code, parking spaces must be at least 9 feet by 19 feet
10 and must be clearly marked and outlined. Currently, at the subject property, the petitioner told
11 Staff the parking spaces are not clearly marked and outlined. Currently, there is not a
12 handicapped parking space at the site, which is also a requirement. Finally,parking is not
13 allowed in the right of way, which is currently occurring.
14
15 Ms. Hall indicated that, according to the City's code,parking is prohibited in the following: (a)
16 within five feet of a side lot line; (b)within 10 feet of the front property line; and(c)within 10
17 feet of the rear lot line. Also, when a commercial property, such as this, abuts residential areas,
18 it is unlawful to park a vehicle or provide a parking space closer than 20 feet. Residential
19 housing is at the southern(side) line of the subject property and at the eastern(rear)property
20 line. The other two sides are roadways.
21
22 Ms. Hall indicated a conditional use permit is required for the gas station use in the commercial
23 zoning district. Staff could not locate in City records the original conditional use permit;
24 however, the City Manager felt the proposed changes to the site were significant enough to
25 warrant going through the public process for review of potential conditions.
26
27 Ms. Hall indicated the proposed plan meets all other City code requirements as far as setbacks,
28 floor area ratio, etc.
29
30 Bruce Madsen, of Griffith Contracting, reviewed the proposed expansion plans with the
31 Commission. He then indicated that he feels the proposal would enhance the property and allow
32 customers to flow more quickly through the business.
33
34 Mr. Madsen indicated that they feel that the fueling station parking spots should be counted
35 toward the City requirement as vehicles are parked there to fuel and run in to pay or buy coffee.
36
37 Chair Melsha noted that three members of the Commission would not be on the Commission
38 next month. He then said that he feels that the 33 n Avenue entrance could be an issue as there is
39 not much room to maneuver in the area.
40
41 Mr. Madsen indicated that there have been issues with the parking in that area.
42
43 Chair Melsha indicated that he is concerned with adding additional pumps putting them so close
44 to the store and creating more congestion on the site.
45
46 Mr. Madsen indicated the owner of the property has gone to the expense of adding credit card
47 readers to move people through faster and would like to have the 8 additional pumps.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
December 16, 2003 59
Page 7
1 .
2 Commissioner Steeves indicated that credit card readers could be added to the existing pumps .
3 without adding the additional pumping stations.
4
5 Mr. Madsen asked the Commission to consider that the property owner is spending money to
6 improve the site and make it easier for customers. He also commented that the lighting would be
7 improved.
8
9 Commissioner Stromgren indicated the lighting would need to be reviewed to ensure that it
10 meets the requirements and does not negatively impact the adjacent residential properties.
11
12 Mr. Madsen indicated that the lighting would be low lighting.
13
14 Chair Melsha commented that adding the additional pumps would make it easier for the gas
15 customers but it eliminates parking spaces for the non-gas customers. He then said that the
16 proposal seems to further exacerbate the parking issues on the site making the problems worse.
17
18 Vice Chair Stille expressed concern for pedestrian safety with bringing the pumps closer to the
19 store and making less room available for traffic to flow through and cars being closer to the front
20 door.
21
22 Mr. Madsen indicated that the clearance at other locations within the City is less than proposed
23 at this site. He then said that the distance from the island to the sidewalk would be 24 feet.
24
25 Commissioner Steeves indicated that if someone parked at the handicapped space and someone
26 was at the first fueling station there would be no room to get through.
27
28 Mr. Madsen agreed but said the handicapped stall is not used very frequently so would be open
29 most of the time.
30
31 Commissioner Tillman indicated that she is a frequent shopper at this station and there are
32 always parking issues and people have to back up out into the street to get out.
33
34 Commissioner Stromgren indicated that he would rule out parking on the east side as there is
35 already less than half the required setback.
36
37 Commissioner Hanson suggested having 6 pumping locations rather than the 8 as he does not
38 feel that the site can accommodate the parking and additional gas traffic. He then suggested two
39 single pumps and the big island moved out as a way to get the 6 pumps and said he is not
40 comfortable with adding 8.
41
42 Mr. Madsen indicated that it would be a major expense to move the island.
43
44 Commissioner Hanson commented that if there were no pumps on the side closest to the store it
45 would open it up and prevent issues with the front door. He also indicated the canopy would not
46 need to be as large.
47
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 60
December 16, 2003
Page 8
1 X. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
2 Commissioner Tillman thanked the outgoing Commissioners for their service and indicated she
3 has enjoyed working with them.
4
5 Commissioner Hanson wished Vice Chair Stille good luck on Council and thanked the other
6 outgoing Commissioners for their service, especially Chair Melsha for his time serving as chair.
7
8 Commissioner Stromgren wished Ms. Hall best wishes on the upcoming birth of her child and
9 offered thanks and well wishes for the outgoing Commissioners.
10
11 Commissioner Steeves indicated he has enjoyed the opportunity to serve the City but will enjoy
12 the opportunity to have more time with his family.
13
14 Chair Melsha indicated that he has enjoyed his tenure as chair and thanked Ms. Hall for her
15 assistance.
16
17 Commissioner Hoska extended best wishes to Ms. Hall and then congratulated Mr. Stille on his
18 election to Council. He also thanked Chair Melsha and the other outgoing Co=issioners for
19 their service to the City and informed them that he had been reappointed to the Commission and
20 is glad he will be able to see the Apache project through.
21
22 Vice Chair Stille wished Ms. Hall good luck and said he will be happy to have her back after her
23 leave. He then encouraged Commissioners to take advantage of training courses available
24 through the Government Training Service, as he feels they are invaluable as a tool for helping
25 them serve the City as Commissioners. He then thanked Chair Melsha and the outgoing
26 Commissioners for their service.
27
28 Ms. Hall thanked the outgoing Commissioners and said she looked forward to working with the
29 remaining Commissioners when she returns from her leave.
30
31 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
32 Motion by Commissioner Stromgren, second by Chair Melsha, to adjourn the meeting at 8:03
33 p.m.
34
35 Motion carried unanimously.
36
37 Respectfully submitted,
38
39
40 Joan Lenzmeier
41 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
42
61
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 12/10/03 MEETING DATE: 12/16/03
TO: Chair Melsha & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manage
SUBJECT: Rod Rabine, 2800 34th Avenue NE
Requested Action:
Rod Rabine, 2800 34th Avenue NE, is requesting two variances to complete an addition
to the front of his home.
The first variance request is for lot coverage; the proposed addition exceeds the
allowable maximum of 35 percent in the R-1 single-family zoning district by 2 percent.
According to the petitioner, the project will put the total lot coverage over by
approximately 220 square feet. With the proposed addition, the lot coverage would
measure 3,895 square feet and the lot measures 10,500 square feet—for a total of 37
percent lot coverage.
The second variance request is for the front yard setback because the proposed
addition would encroach into the front yard by ten feet. In the R-1 single-family zoning
district, the front yard must have a depth equal to the greater of 30 feet or a distance
equal to the average of the front yard depths of the two adjacent lots. Given this
formula, staff went to the subject property to measure the adjacent two lots. Staff found
that the east property (2804 34th Avenue NE).measures 30 feet from curb to home and
the west property (2712 34th Avenue NE) measures 35 feet from curb to home. An
average of the two adjacent lots is 33 feet; therefore, the subject property should have
this depth at a minimum. The petitioner is proposing to extend 10 feet out from the
current front of home, or a 10-foot variance request, which would leave'a 23-foot front
yard setback.
Background:
The petitioner is requesting two variances be granted for a 240 square foot addition to
the front of his home. The addition includes a handicap accessible front entry and a
handicap bathroom on the main floor. The petitioner explains the hardship is his mother
who stays with his family on occasion; she is in need of the handicap accessible entry
and bathroom (see letter attached).
While the petitioner's application contains front yard measurements on a hand drawing,
staff verified the subject property in relation to the neighboring lots, because of the
formula for the front yard setback in the zoning code. The measurements on the hand
drawing are not reflective of staff's interpretation; however, the petitioner is in
agreement with city staff at this point.
Staff asked the petitioner if it was possible if the addition could be placed on the back of
the home, possibly minimizing the front yard setback. The reply was that he had never
thought about it, but he said he would consider it further.
62
Staff Recommendation:
The front yard setback variance is a significant request; granting it would impact the site
lines along the block as all of the homes are basically aligned. If the petitioner were
open to it, staff recommends the petitioner look at putting the addition onto the back of
the home. It would also keep the front of the homes looking similar in design standards,
etc. The lot coverage variance isn't as significant as the former request; however, it
should be noted in light of the surrounding area and its appropriateness, given the
hardship noted by the petitioner.
Attachments:
• Application for Lot Coverage Variance
• Application for Front Yard Setback Variance
• Site Map
• Survey
• Drawings
Date: f/-17—y3 63
Fee: .0 0
R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
Applicant: god kri bi`►G Phone: 6'q- 7P- '1072.
Address: 2 br dD 71 7H 4V ,✓E Sf; '44-40-y A.✓ S VIr
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): dwilee-
Legal Description of property proposed'for variance: L-a-$ S glad! z 6ei e. errace
Street Address: 28 0 tiTg7N' /I✓ -44,!!5,-
Presently Zoned: Res e=►f
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance. would relieve an undue hardship, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced. p
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable.to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district.
S'ce
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently havin an interest in the parcel of land.
SEC cti-ft�c�+Et 1 U HV—
Signature of Applicant
11 -17 -03 *6 0 o0 0CK
64
Rod Rabine
2800 34th Ave NE
St. Anthony,MN 55418
612-789-4072
11-15-03
Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council,
I am applying for a variance affecting the front of our home. The goal of the
project is to create a handicap accessible front entry, and a handicap bathroom on the main
floor. This project will put our total lot coverage over by approximately 220 sglt..
The circumstances leading to the project are as follows; My mother and father live in
Michigan during the summer. They are 70 plus years old, and my mother is paralyzed
from the waist down. She is permanently in a wheel chair and has trouble getting into the
front of our home. As of now we do not have a ramp, but wish to put one in creating an
accessible entry. My parents live with us several months out of the winter, and visit often
during the summer.
The other goal of the project is to create a handicap bathroom on the main floor. As of
now we have one small bathroom on the main floor. My mother is limited to the main
floor and the one small bathroom. It takes my mother 30+minutes to use the toilet, and
over 1 hour to bathe. This causes her stress and makes her uncomfortable taking the time
she needs to use the bathroom. There are times she will not bathe for several days
because she does not want to take up the time in the bathroom. An additional bathroom
will give her the space and time she needs to comfortably use the bathroom stress free.
My wife and I have a 4 year old son and plan on raising him here in St. Anthony. We have
lived here for 2 1/2 years. I have a secure job with the City of Mpls, and appreciate the
proximity of my home to my job. We have no intentions of selling our home, on the
contrary we plan on staying here until retirement. I say this to show we are not motivated
by the increased value of our home,but only the relieve this project will bring.
It is important to us to give my mother a home she can live in without the hardships of a
non-accessible home. If for any reason my father were to pass on, I feel obligated and
would insist on having a home my mother could live in. This project would give us that
home and relieve the hardship.
We thank you for your consideration and assistance in this matter.
Rod Rabine
65
Materials used in project
Front porch with handicap ramp
*Decking will be cedar
*Porch facing will be stone or brick
*Porch will have railings with pillar posts
*Ramp will come off the driveway
*Front door will be changed to facing the street
Handicap bathroom addition
*Siding will be brick or stucco
*Two additional windows will be added
Landscaping
*Various shrubs and flowers
Our lot coverage in detail .
Our lot is 10,500 sqft
*35%=3675 sqft of coverage is allowed under city ordinance
The coverage we have now broken down is;
*2028 sqft House/Sidewalk
*1052 sqft Driveway
*440 sqft Garage
*13 5 sqft Rear porch
Total coverage is 3655 sqft leaving 20 sqft of coverage left to be used
The proposed project will add an additional 240 sqft of coverage
*240 sqft -20 sqft=220 sqft of coverage over the 35% allowed under city
ordinance.
66
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 03 - 011
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT COVERAGE
VARIANCE FOR 2800 - 34TH AVENUE NE
WHEREAS, the St. Anthony Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 16,
2003, to consider a request from Rod Rabine for a lot coverage variance at 2800-
34`'' Avenue NE; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of said request, citing
that strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship, as the
driveway covers an unusual amount of property and is a condition that pre-existed
prior to enactment of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
Date: 67
Fee: 00.00
R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
Applicant: god k j;r, Phone: W4—y D 7 Z
Address: 71-00 nRi II V Al bf. rte ✓�nf�+D���
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): c')tvV%ev-
Legal Description of property proposed for variance: Lo-f r AcK;Z Aide, --err ate
Street Address: /1'✓ Alb" J Yav► , H
Presently Zoned: reS C-$aoa
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance would relieve an undue*hardship, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced.
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon,a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district.
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
r
Signature of Applicant
68
Rod Rabine
2800 34th Ave NE
St. Anthony, MN 55418
612-789-4072
11-15-03
Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council,
I am applying for a variance affecting the front of our home. The goal of the
project is to create a handicap accessible front entry, and a handicap bathroom on the main
floor. hoam3 _ IN ,
�+ �+ V 1.a1lala {.11c—Cq.OVaHbIalY 1113(5 "�" ee
- les lilt
The circumstances leading to the project are as follows; My mother and father live in
Michigan during the summer. They are 70 plus years old, and my mother is paralyzed
from the waist down. She is permanently in a wheel chair and has trouble getting into the
front of our home. As of now we do not have a ramp,but wish to put one in creating an
accessible entry. My parents live with us several months out of the winter, and visit often
during the summer.
The other goal of the project is to create a handicap bathroom on the main floor. As of
now we have one small bathroom on the main floor. My mother is limited to the main
floor and the one small bathroom. It takes my mother 30+minutes to use the toilet, and
over 1 hour to bathe. This causes her stress and makes her uncomfortable taking the time
she needs to use the bathroom. There are times she will not bathe for several days
because she does not want to take up the time in the bathroom. An additional bathroom
will give her the space and time she needs to comfortably use the bathroom stress free.
My wife and I have a 4 year old son and plan on raising him here in St. Anthony. We have
lived here for 2 1/2 years: I have a secure job with the City of Mpls, and appreciate the
proximity of my home to my job. We have no intentions of selling our home, on the
contrary we plan on staying here until retirement. .I say this to show we are not motivated
by the increased value of our home, but only the relieve this project will bring.
It is important to us to give my mother a home she can live in without the hardships of a
non-accessible home. If for any reason my father were to pass on, I feel obligated and
would insist on having a home my mother could live in. This project would give us that
home and relieve the hardship.
We thank you for your consideration and assistance in this matter.
1 fol Il
69
Materials used in project
Front porch with handicap ramp
*Decking will be cedar, or concrete
*Porch facing will be stone or brick
*Porch will have railings with pillar posts
*Ramp will come off the driveway
*Front door will be changed to facing the street
Handicap bathroom addition
*Siding will be brick or stucco
*Two additional windows will be added
Landscaping
*Various shrubs and flowers
Our lot coverage in detail
Our lot is 10,500 sgft
*35% =3675 sgft of coverage is allowed under city ordinance
The coverage we have now broken down is;
*2028 sgft House/Sidewalk
*1052 sqft Driveway
*440 sgft Garage
*13 5 sgft Rear porch
Total coverage is 3655 sgft leaving 20 sgft of coverage left to be used
The proposed project will add an additional 240 sgft of coverage
*240 sgfft- 20 sgft=220 sgft of coverage over the 35% allowed under city
ordinance.
����
A?A,,A VIS L�
7�
.SL
N
l
r•
,ez
C-4
r
e
I M
,h2
1
� 1
I� 1
I� I
OL ' I
i 1
1 I
ALI Y. 9
B� . /` .
7`� Al?ev
M ✓' G �DN
goo
4 bemf.)..v.:cert'_s r ,at.this a�ryr�,.g"an, 0 r"rf
a ur: erj. ,clie�i supkx^
s.prf}�red'.by me Or... .�
:^islet+ and: t L�t-.1:-ern a duly. .A.4stc-, 1 oe
ti;irvgyor r3nder
the thirStail;-�,f Mid
72
IFT I
y (
I
. �Ij
�..�'k-
r�_�
wn
�,lg��-y�.����z�� A ttaF�� �`�-s✓�v�ax -rd�-^� �.1�'x v�y° e:�
der+ _..�,� �n•�c�r F63,- h (^`'�"u- f ��°7 � F ) �t <�` -a �r-+M y_
?c
,,r r?F;
{-y�Pd�u�,� bfj r-�2 M Y h�,..Lr� "7t � 31 t.�nK-y Lt -"+ FC � ♦R -
��.��x�s�'`��,J,��.st�.l.`'�c�,���F'�`4l"W'S T`�.f�..G�_r n a t� �4 jl��r�'}�r•
h-
j`tsCKiYS FT S c`mtcc.i�S'�-•�-1'r-2Vy.3E �.1-•+,4�i.
1 � xf�+���tdn�.>•+- t �.�h�4`'l �� '°�" ��' �. j n�z -�.- ` ur+.mom'
-too-
i;
r•YMY,f`e
„� . V.
r 1�7�t
�•ty�'7 �j�-.c.^ 5�5n. r�ST'�?�i� -�� ��S� '�i �k n12 �� :a
k'.'t
;kd r
I
,ly, f 2 `tom
as-• rf�.y?zy� i s.'. ,� �y` a i� tt� �1ar t a{z5 s ;1 }vi
�.se,
r
b
, l-�
t . -�. ""-ts'��.�r'-rc�� t' n,r"._•s {.�"""is a� ,w� �-.'�� �3 i �„�Y_
tar's r +uti mac, 4 3 i7 is� � "' it -rg
L�-+s.., 1s_J°t�,rc"�w:�.�?( •;]r c� �� rr�rt?s 4"� �� �;
( ki
�^' j-?J43
����
RIM-
MM. M S1r 4x r .7—
� .,,1 "Z-" c �'-, ;,4�Yrs'
s`-�' h � a k'Cs.4`,5�.,5�ty,�!yr�
,s '4.a .rS` Wit- `ry-F� °�'=4' ;'�c'�t;; "�`.'-�, yc- 7' �.
74
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 03 - 012
A RESOLUTION DENYING A FRONT YARD SETBACK
VARIANCE FOR 2800 - 34TH AVENUE NE
WHEREAS, the St. Anthony Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 16,
2003 regarding a front yard setback variance request for 2800 - 34`h Avenue NE;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council deny said request by Rod
Rabine, because granting the variance would result in an alteration of the
character of the surrounding properties and the neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby denies the front yard setback variance request by Rod Rabine, for 2800-34th Avenue NE.
Adopted this day of 12004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
��s � A
WSB 75
cYc Associates,Inc.
r
December 29, 2003
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Staff
s
I City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony, MN 55418
i
Re: 2004 Street Reconstruction, Storm Sewer Water Main, and Sanitary Sewer and
Appurtenant Work
City of St. Anthony Village
WSB Project No. 1065-84
Dear Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
Bids were received on the above-referenced project on December 18, 2003 and were
opened and read allowed. A total of 13 bids were received. The bids were checked for
mathematical accuracy and tabulated.
Please find enclosed the bid tabulations summary indicating the low bidder as S.M.
Hentges & Sons, Inc. of Jordan Minnesota, in the amount of$1,288,929.58. It is
anticipated that the City Council would consider awarding the contract to S.M. Hentges &
'. Sons, Inc. at your February 24, 2004 Council Meeting.
Also enclosed, for your consideration, are three (3) resolutions relating to the 2004 Street
Reconstruction Project. These resolutions are as follows:
t
1. Resolution 04-013 —Calling a Hearing on the 2004 Street and Utility
Improvements.
2. Resolution 04-014—Declaring the Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of
Proposed Assessment.
tj ( 3. Resolution 04-015 —Calling a Hearing on Proposed Assessment for 2004 Street
j and Utility Improvements.
Should the Council desire to approve the attached three (3)resolutions, public hearings for
both the Street and Utility Improvements and the Proposed Assessments would be held at
the February 10, 2004 Council Meeting.
,4156 Olson
Me�,orial Highway We anticipate holding a public informational meeting on Wednesday, January 28, 2004, at
7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers to discuss the proposed assessments and answer
suit`3oo any questions residents may have in regards to the 2004 Street Improvement Project.
in;eapo�lis Notices for this meeting will be mailed out following approval of the attached resolutions.
mnespta '
4�1 2'
7 ;5414800
763,541.1700 FAX Minneapolis - St. Cloud • Equal Opportunity Employer F:\WPWIId\1065-84\122903-hmcc.doc
Honorable Mayor, City Council,and City Staff �S
City of St.Anthony
December 29,2003
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions, please call me at(763) 287-7182. I will also be available at the
January 6, 2004 City Council Meeting.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates,Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Associate
Attachments
sm
F:I WP{VIM 1065-841127903-hmcc.d oc
77
~� BID TABULATION SUMMARY
PROJECT:
2004 Street Reconstruction, Storm Sewer,Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, and Appurtenant Work
City of St.Anthony Village
LOCATION:
St.Anthony Village
WSB PROJECT NO.:
1065-84
Bids Opened: Thursday, December 18, 2003, 10:00 a.m.
Contractor Addendums Rec'd. Bid Security Total Bid
1 S. M. Hentges&Sons, Inc. X X $1,288,929.58
2 Northdale Construction Co., Inc. X X $1,293,197.07
3 S.R. Weidema, Inc. X X $1,364,815.90
4 Richard Knutson, Inc. X X $1,379,358.75**
5 Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. X X $1,392,688.40
6 Lametti &Sons, Inc. X X $1,412,219.00**
7 Friedges Contracting Co. X X $1,465,488.67
8 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. X X $1,469,047.85**
9 S.J. Louis Construction X X $1,569,381.50
10 Arcon Construction X X $1,597,804.65
11 Barbarossa and Sons X X $1,638,753.55**
12 Redstone Construction X X $1,677,368.34**
13 Thomas and Sons X X $1,737,882.70
Engineer's Opinion of Cost $1,424,544.50
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as r ceived on December 18, 2003.
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E., Project Manager
** Denotes corrected figure
78
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-013
A RESOLUTION CALLING A HEARING ON
2004 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to direction of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, a report has
been prepared with reference to the improvements:
2004 Street and Utility Improvements Project
This project consists of street reconstruction, replacement, or new construction of
sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer lines on the following streets:
1. Belden Drive,between 32nd Avenue and 33rd Avenue
2. Hilldale Avenue,between Belden Drive and Silver Lake Road
3. 32nd Avenue, between Belden Drive and Silver Lake Road
w
4. Tonview Avenue,between Wilson Street and Silver Lake Road
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
1. The Council will consider the improvement of such street and utilities in
accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for a
portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter
429 at an estimated total cost of the improvements of$1,700,000.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 10th day
of February 2004, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. or as
soon thereafter as possible, and the Clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
Adopted this day of 92004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
F:\WPWMI065-84\Resolutions\Resolution 04-013(Hearing on Util Improv)122903.doc
79
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-014
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE COST TO BE ASSESSED
AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of:
1. Belden Drive, between 32nd Avenue and 33rd Avenue
2. Hilldale Avenue, between Belden Drive and Silver Lake Road
3. 32nd Avenue,between Belden Drive and Silver Lake Road
4. Townview Avenue,between Wilson Street and Silver Lake Road
and the bid price for such an improvement is $1,288,929.58, and the total cost of
the improvement will be approximately$1,700,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby
declared to be $1,310,000, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against
benefited property owners is declared to be $390,000.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the
first Monday in 2005, and shall bear interest at the rate of 2 percent (2%)
above the City's borrowing rate at the time the bonds are issued.
3. The Consulting Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be
specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and the City Clerk shall file a copy of such proposed
assessment in the office for public inspection.
4. The City Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify
the Council thereof.
F:\WPWMI065-84\Resolutions\Resolution 04-014(Cost and Assessment)122903.doc
80
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
81
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 04-015
A RESOLUTION CALLING A HEARING ON PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT FOR 2004 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, by direction of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, a proposed assessment
of the cost of the following improvement has been prepared:
2004 Street and Utility Improvements Project
This project consists of street reconstruction replacement, or new construction of
sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer lines on the following streets:
1. Belden Drive, between 32nd Avenue and 33`d Avenue
2. Hilldale Avenue, between Belden Drive and Silver Lake Road
3. 32nd Avenue, between Belden Drive and Silver Lake Road
4. Townview Avenue,between Wilson Street and Silver Lake Road
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of February 2004, in the City Council
Chambers at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, to pass upon such
proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property
affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published twice in the official newspaper at least .
two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the
improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the
owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than 10 days
prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification
of the assessment to the County Auditor,pay the whole of the assessment on
such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by
November 14th of the assessed year.
The owner may, at any time thereafter,pay to the Finance Director the entire
amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 14th or the interest will be charged through December
31St of the succeeding year.
F:\WPWIN\1065-84\Resolutions\Resolution 04-015(Hearing on Assessment)122903.doc
82
Adopted this day of Y2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
83
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Chin �hoa�y
ill a C%
Report Date: December 30, 2003
Meeting Date: January 6, 2004 Agenda Section: VII, B
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ordinance adopting new State Building Code and Fee
Schedule
MANAGER'S REVIEW: The newest.version of the State Building Code, which the
City of St. Anthony uses as a guide for building permits, was adopted this year by the
State. It was last updated in 1997. With the adoption of this code, we are also adopting
a new fee schedule. See example of new vs old fee schedule from the League of
Minnesota Cities memo.
To give you an example of how the new fee schedule will work:
The Amcon project paid $8,740 in 2003 under the old fee schedule. The same project
in 2004 would provide us with a fee of$8,955 - an increase of$485..
Adoption of the new fee schedule will provide the City the ability to capture more
revenues.
Michael Mornson �
Pty Manager
84
Association of
Metropolitan
Municipalities
November 25, 2003
Dear AMM Member:
Earlier this fall, at the request of several member cities,the League of Minnesota
Cities (LMC) and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities(AMM)held a
meeting of building officials, community development directors, and finance
directors from metropolitan-area cities to discuss the absence of a model fee schedule
in the newly adopted state building code. The meeting resulted in the formation of a
smaller working group to consider various methodologies for updating the 1997 fee
schedule.
After three meetings,the working group reported back to the larger group,which
accepted its recommendations and asked that they be forwarded to all cities in the
metropolitan area, as well as interested cities in Greater Minnesota.
Please take a moment to review and consider the enclosed report, which recommends
a sample fee schedule that cities may use as a guide in setting building permit fees.
The report also expresses support for a new process for inspecting certain minor
installations, such as water heaters and water softeners.
If you have any questions or need additional'information,please feel free to contact
me at(651)215-4001 or Laura Offerdahl,with the League of Minnesota Cities,at
(651)281-1260.
Sincerely,
Gene Ranieri
Executive Director
145 University Avenue West
Saint Paul,Minnesota 55103-2044
Telephone:(651)215-4000
Fax:(651)281-1299
E-mail:amm @amm145.org
88
Report of the LMC / AMM ®� r
Building Permit Fees association of
Working Group Metropolitan
Municipalities
November, 2003
The following is a sample fee schedule that cities may use as a guide in setting local
building permit fees. The sample fee schedule was developed using the 1997 Uni-
versal Building Code(UBC)fee schedule as a base and applying a Consumer Price
Index (CPI)adjustment.
Value Range 1997 UBC 2003 Recommended
$1 -$50 $23.50 $25.00
$500-$2,000 $23.50 for the first$500 $25.00 for the first$500
$3.05/additional$100 $3.25/additional$100
$2,001 -$25,000 $69.25 for the first$2,000 $73.50 for the first$2,000
$14.00/additional$1,000 $14.75/additional$1,000
$25,001 -$50,000 $392.25 for the first$25,000 $415.75 for the first$25,000
$10.10/additional$1,000 $10.75/additional $1,000
$50,001 -$100,000 $643.75 for the first$50,000 $682.50 for the first$50,000
$7.00/additional$1,000 $7.50/additional$1,000
$100,001 -$500,000 $993.75 for the first$100,000 $1,053.50 for the first$100,000
$5.60/additional$1,000 $6.00/additional$1,000
$500,001 -$1,000,000 $3,233.75 for the first$500,000 $3,427.75 for the first$500,000
$4.75/additional$1,000 $5.00/additional$1,000
$1,000,001 and up $5,608.75 for the first$1,000,000 $5,945.25 for the first$1,000,000
$3:65/additional$1,000 $4.00/additional$1,000
Unlike previous versions of the state building code, the code adopted in 2003 did
not contain a sample fee schedule. Therefore, the above fee schedule was devel-
oped cooperatively by members of the League of Minnesota Cities and the Asso-
ciation of Metropolitan Municipalities, with information provided by the State
Building Codes and Standards Division.
(More on reverse. . .)
86
Additional Recommendations
1. When considering the sample fee schedule, individual cities need to evaluate the cost of
administering the state building code in their community. Minnesota Statute 16B.685 re-
quires all cities that collect more than$5,000 in construction and development-related fees a
year to annually report all fees collected from developers, builders, and subcontractors and
the corresponding expenses for which fees were collected.
2. Cities should also consider the impact of valuation increases when setting fees. Before ad-
justing fee schedules, cities should consider how much additional revenue will be generated
as a result of their existing fee schedule being applied to projects of increasing valuation.
3. Cities not currently using the 1997 UBC schedule should consider phasing in the sample
2003 fee schedule.
4. Cities should plan on adjusting the fee schedule every three years in conjunction with the
state's 3-year building code adoption cycle. Therefore, the fee schedule should be adjusted
again with the adoption of the new State Building Code in 2006.
Minor Label Program
The state of Minnesota should work with cities to establish a"Minor Label Program,"modeled after
the one currently operated in Oregon, which allows licensed contractors to purchase "labels" from
the state and apply them to certain minor installations such as water heaters or water softeners. The
contractor then submits a record of where the labels have been used, the state notifies local govern-
ments of the installation locations, and the local government conducts spot checks on randomly
selected installations performed by that contractor.
The program has numerous potential benefits. The contractor pays a lower fee for the labels than he
or she would for a conventional permit,and stakes his or her continued participation in the program
on the quality of work performed. The local building official spends less time inspecting minor
installations, therefore leaving more time for new construction and major remodels. Finally, Or-
egon has found that the number of labels sold and recorded annually has greatly exceeded the num-
ber of permits taken out for similar installations prior to implementation of the minor label program.
Participation in the minor label program should be voluntary for cities. The program should begin
by focusing on the installation of water heaters and water softeners, with the idea that it could be
extended to other installations at a later date.
87
1300:0160
lUI1NIV�SOu RUL_S.'CHAPTEF
MI
N 1300 Q160 and:residential,occupancies built to fire International N
N fFEES I3utldmg Code tha W6 three stones and less m height. M
N alkout, lookout,. N
Subpart 1eLedule of permmt fees phe applicant for a per M
(a) fountlaho>x types include w
N g! ucture;oY electtiical,`gas,meeha»�cal;ar
and fall basetftent;
-M .�(b) foundatton.utateriais to iliciude.pouted concrete, N .
N plu>7_Ing System or alterations reijuinng a permit shall pay M
M masonry amts,and wood; N
N the fee by the mumcipalrty M
M Sub Z Fees commensurate with service.Fees established (c) garage diinenstons N
N, F (d) roof design changed bar a revised truss plan
M by die rriunicipaitty must be by oilmance and must be fan, roved;li the butld>a official; N.
N aPp Y g:. M
N re�sonai5ie :and proportionate to the actiial:cost of the service N
foxrluch the fee is tm osed (e) bays or santitevered floor azeas, M
P (fl decks and porches,and M
M Subp 3 $hti�t�iiig permit.�ataations The applicant for a (g} other modifications approved by the building N
' permit shall provide an estimated.permit value;at time,of official, M
N
apptrafioti Iserirltt:valuations shall mclude total value of all 4 ocen an ou s other than;those identified m the .M
M construction work,including matenals and labor;for which exceptions listed m part 1300:0160 subpart:6,item :N
M the ernut is bean .7ssued,such as electtical, gas;imecham
N P $ A,subitem(3} must be the sanne type:of construction N
N cal,'pitunbuig equipment,,and peimanenG:systems Building and occcupancy.classification;and must have the same..M
>N pertrut valuntton snap be set b�the building official exit system, `. N
M
M ] xceptaons.Building permit valuations for the following Exception:_Mii�ar changes to the exit access and N
M structures shaIl lie based on the':valuation of on site work - N
N -. - �(5)'the similar tan is based on a:master plan for which .
N ° y the municipality has issued a permit within the last 12'
N A ManufaCtured homes.containing a:Housing_and Urban .. montlis M
n"Mn Developmen€(fflJD)certification Iabel, M
N B. Plan review fees for simiilar.buil. g plans must be N
B dabncated` buildings with a Minnesota Building M
N p based-on the costs commensurate with the direct aiAindirect N
Codes andStandazds IStvision refabncadioii label and N
ff
E liidiislraaltzed/modularbutldingswrth an Industrzaiized cost of the service,butmust not exceed 25 percent of the nor- N
N mat building.:permit: ee Established and-charged .by the M
N Bl77ld1Ilg E'Oi imtssioii(IBC'}_label N
N Subp 4 Building permitfees Buildmg permit fees shall be municipality or the samestriicture. N .
Mbased on vabuateon` C The plan review,:fee charged for smtilar building plans N ,
N applies to all buildings regulated by the code regardless.of N
lxceptions
occupancy classification including mdustuah rliodalar N
N A fine-:and two=family dwelling maintenance permits for buildings constructed under a .program specified m
roofing siding, wmdows doors, cir other tumor prof Minnesota Statufies section 16B 75 M
un ects i►ay be charged a fixed fee, D ..The appli cant must sutimit.a`new-plan set and other .N
N B Permits for plumbing, mechanical,:electncaY, or:other M
' information as required by the building.official:for each M
building service equipment systems may be based on .
^� building reviewed as a similar•building M
M valuation or charged a fixed fee,and N
C Replacement of a residential fixture or appliance.can Subp.:7 Pa�irient of fees.?.penntt shall riot be issued until N
N not exceed ;the permit fee-limitation established:by the fees prescribed by the munictpalitiy have been paid N;
M Minnesota Statutes;section`16B 665 Subp :8 Work corfimencing before perniiiit issuamce. ?f
M Subp 5 Piaareview fees for sntiilar plans When subiint work.for which a permit is required_by:the:code has been M
doct�ents fpr-5"imilar plans are`approved undeL Subpart 6, commenced without:fast obtamit<g a permit;:a special roves- M
M plan review fees shall not e�cceed:25 percent of the
norm ligation shall be made,before a pernnit maybe issued for the N
butidmg permit fee established and charged by the pinsdic work;An.investigation fee established liy:the municipality N . .
lion for the;same stirncture: shall be collected and is in_addition to the required permit. M
N N
MSubp 6_ L3nregiew of similar plans fee s,but it may note xceed the permit fee N
N A Any cumber-of similar baicimgs may be built from a Sift.9 .Fee icefunds.-The in
shall establish,a per N
N master plan>f mitand plan review fee refund policy N.
N Sub 10 State surclia a fees.Aflmumci al rmits issued N
(f) plan review-fees have been paid for the master plan p P. M.
" (2) a cede change has not occurred that impacts:`,the for work under the code aze:subJecf to a surcharge fee.The. M
N fees are established by Minnesota Statutes,section 16B.70. N
M design of a.master plan,
(3� thesimilar building has the same physical dimensions Reports and remittances by riiunicipalities must be filed with..N
N and structural:&W esign as the master plan, the commissioner,directed to:=the attention_ot the state build- is
mg official N '
Exception The following modifications to.:the in nn
M plan are not considereii to be:`sigtnficant modifications, Surcharge.fees imposed by the state a>a in addition to. M
M accordiiig to Minnesota statutes,section 16B61,suhclivi municipal ermit fees Surcharge report forms and informs= N_
N
P ..
son 1, and aze permitted 'occupancies, an tion:rnay be'obtained by writing die commissioner to th e .m .
N
N dwelling units liuilt to the lntemational Res' ential Code attention of fire state building official: N
10
20001NTEF1NATlONAL:BUI LDING CODE®
88
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ORDINANCE 2004-001
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE. THIS
ORDINANCE: PROVIDES FOR THE APPLICATION,ADMINISTRATION, AND
ENFORCEMENT OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE BY REGULATING THE
ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING,
REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE,HEIGHT,
AREA, AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THIS
MUNICIPALITY; PROVIDES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF
FEES THEREOF; PROVIDES FOR PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; REPEALS
ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES THAT CONFLICT THEREWITH
The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains:
Section 1. Section 1305 shall read as follows:
SECTION 1305 -MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
1305.01. A_nnlication, Administration and Enforcement. The application, administration, and
enforcement of the code shall be in accordance with Minnesota Rule Chapter 1300. The code
shall be enforced within the extraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota Statutes, 16B.62,
subdivision 1, when so established by this ordinance.
The code enforcement agency of this municipality is called the Department of Building Safety.
This code shall be enforced by the Minnesota Certified Building Official designated by this
municipality to administer the code (Minnesota Statute 1613.65) subdivision 1.
1305.02. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 16B.59 to 16B.75 is hereby adopted as the building code for this Municipality. The code
is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set out herein.
Subd. 1. The Minnesota State Building Code includes the following chapters of
Minnesota Rules:
a. 1300, Administration of the Minnesota State Building Code;
b. 1301, Building Official Certification;
C. 1302, State Building Code Construction Approvals;
d. 1303,Minnesota Provisions;
e. 1305, Adoption of the 2000 International Building Code;
f. 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems;
g. 1307, Elevators and Related Devices;
h. 1309, Adoption of the 2000 International Residential Code;
89
i. 1311, Adoption of the 2000 Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Existing
Buildings;
j. 1315, Adoption of the 2002 National Electrical Code;
k. 1325, Solar Energy Systems;
1. 1330, Fallout Shelters;
m. 1335, Flood proofing Regulations;
n. 1341, Minnesota Accessibility Code;
o. 1346, Adoption of the Minnesota State Mechanical Code;
P. 1350, Manufactured Homes;
q. 1360, Prefabricated Structures;
r. 1361, Industrialized/Modular Buildings;
S. 1370, Storm Shelters (Manufactured Home Parks);
t. 4715, Minnesota Plumbing Code;
U. 7670, 7672, 7674, 7676, and 7678,Minnesota Energy Code
Subd. 2. This municipality may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional
chapters of Minnesota Rules: Chapter 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems; and Chapter
1335, Flood proofing Regulations,parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200.
Subd. 3. This municipality may adopt by reference appendix chapter K(Grading), of the
2001 Supplements to the International Building Code.
Subd. 4. The following optional provisions identified in Section 2, Subds. 2 and 3 are
hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the Building Code of this municipality.
a. Chapter 1335, Flood proofing Regulations,Parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200.
1305.03. Surcharge. In addition to the Building Permit Fees, as listed below,the applicant for a
building permit shall pay a surcharge to be remitted to the Minnesota Department of
Administration as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes 16B.70.
1305.04. Repeal. Section 1305 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances and all ordinances in
conflict or inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
1305.05. Violations and Penalties. A violation of the code is a misdemeanor(Minnesota Statute
16B.69) and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1300.
Section 2. Section 615.07, Fee Schedule#12, shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:.
12 415.08 HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING&REFRIGERATION FEES:
RESIDENTIAL(R-1, R-1 A, R-2)
Each dwelling unit(new construction) $150.00
Other(Furnace, Gas Range, Gas Dryer,
90
Hot Water Heater, Air Conditioner,
Gas Piping, Duct Work, etc.) $ 30.00
COMMERCIAL/LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY
(C, LI, R-3,R-4)
All 3%of contract price
Add $20.00 Administrative Fee and
$.50 surcharge to all permits
NOTE: The minimum permit fee for commercial, industrial, institutional or business
occupancies is $20.00 plus State permit fee surcharge.
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
Total Valuation Fee
$1 to $500 $25.00
$501 to $2,000 $25.00 for the first $500
$3.25 additional $100
$2,001 to $25,000 $73.50.for the first $2,000
$14.75/additional $1,000
$25,001 to $50,000 $415.75 for the first$25,000
$10.75/additional $1,000
$50,001 to $100,000 $682.50 for the first$50,000
$7.50/additional $1,000
$100,001 to $500,000 $1,053.50 for the first$100,000
$6.00/additional $1,000
$500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,427.75 for the first$500,000
$5.00/additional $1,000
$1,000,001 and up $5,945.25 for the first$1,000,000
$4.00/additional$1,000
Other Inspections and Fees:
a. Inspections outside of normal business hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50.00 per hour*
(minimum charge-two hours)
b. Reinspection; fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8 . . . . . . . . $50.00 per hour*
C. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50.00 per hour*
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
d. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions . . . . . . . . . . . $50.00*
to plans (minimum charge - one-half hour)
e. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both . Actual costs**
91
*Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include
supervision, overhead, equipment,hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
**Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
NOTE: A plan review fee of 65% of the permit fee will be charged for building permits
which require the submittal of plans. Fees for similar plans will be charged in
accordance with provisions of Minnesota Rules Chapter 1300.0160, Subd. 5.
16 500.08 Duplicate license certificate or tag $1.50
18 1160.03 Antennas,Disk Antennas, &Towers Per current inspection
fee
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to
law.
First Reading: January 6, 2004
Second Reading:
Adopted:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
December 22,',2003
illa a FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues
January 27 Regular Planning Commission items-January 20,2004
February 10 Regular Res., Order street improvements for 2004
Public hearing-Res.,Adopt&confirm assessments
for 2004 street improvements
Res.,Award bid for contractor for 2004 street
improvements
Res., Call for sale of GO improvement bonds for
2004 street improvements
February 24 Regular Planning Commission issues-February 17, 2004
March 9 Regular Consider bids for water plant
March 23 Regular Planning Commission issues-March 16, 2004
January 2004
Monthly Planner
Sunday Tuesday I'Vedues6Y
1 2 3
Dec 2003 Feb 2004 New Year's Day Office closed
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S - Day Off
1 2 3 4 5 6 I 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
28 29 30 31 29
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6:30 PM Joint 7:00 PM First
meeting with Regular Council
School District meeting of 2004
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Regular Council
meeting
canceled
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
7:00 PM
Planning
Commission
meeting
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
7:00 PM
Regular Council
meeting
]February 2®®4
Monthly Planner
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
7:00 PM Parks 7:00 PM Council
Commission Meeting
meeting
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Presidents'Day 7:00 PM
-Day off Planning
Commission
meeting
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
7:00 PM Council
Meeting
29
Jan 2004 Mar 2004
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 -
II 12 13 14 15 16 17 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 30 31
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 11/3012003
Interest Date
4/M GENERAL
$873,000 CONCORD MINUTEMAN COMM PAPER 1.020% 11/25/03 02/18/04 $870,938.75
$870,938.75
4/M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION
$1,250,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 11/07/01 02/22/29 $191,662.50
$ 240,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.00% 08/05/02 08/15/22 $61,800.00
$ 200,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.02% 02104/03 02/04/28 $101,033.87
$518,000 EDISON ASSET SECURITY COMM PAPER 1.020% 11/25/03 02/18/03 $516,776.94
$518,000 THREE CROWNS FUNDING COMM PAPER 1.020% 11/25/03 02/18/03 $516,776.94
$1,388,050.25
DAIN RAUSCHER-GENERAL
GNMA POOL 6472 7.50% 07/01175 07/15/05 $291.69
GNMA POOL 14376 7.50% 03/01/77 03/15/07 $988.34
GNMA POOL 23364 9.00% 09/01/78 09/15/08 $457.01
GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01/78 11/15/08 $1,081.31
$100,000 FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 07/25/02 07/25/22 $100,000.00
$670,000 FED HOME LOAN MTG-ZERO COUPON 7.150% 01/22/02 02/22/29 $99,948.90
$1,203,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMM PAPER 1.085% 11/25/03 02123/04 $1,199,797.60
$1,402,564.85
DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL
$100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12/15/99 03/08129 $10,105.00
$100,000 LASELLEBANK-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.50% 09/11/02 09/11/22 $27,798.64
$100,000 STANDARD FEDERAL-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.50% 09/11/02 09/11/22 $27,798.64
$100,000 LASELLEBANK-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.375% 01/08/03 01/22/23 $28,480.61
$100,000 STANDARD FEDERAL-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.375% 01/08/03 01/22/23 $28,480.61
$100,000 LASELLE BANK-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.25% 02/19103 02119/23 $29,170.00
$100,000 STANDARD FEDERAL-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.25% 02/19/03 02/19/23 $29,170.00
$653,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMMECIAL PAPER 1.056% 11/25103 02/23/04 $651,310.16
$832,313.66
DEAN WITTER
$680,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-ZERO 7.10% 06/15/01 04/05/19 $97,722.56
$520,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH ZERO COUPON BOND 6.00% 09/24/02 09/15/18 $199,477.00
$1,353,000.00 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMM PAPER 1.07% 11/26/03 03/01104 $1,349,536.32
$200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-STEP UP 6.50% 12/28101 12/15/16 $200,000.00
$100,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE 6.25% 07/31/02 07/31/17 $100,000.00
$200,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK MED TERM NOTE 5.976% 08/27/02 10/25/16 $200,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK MED TERM NOTE 6.00% 11126/02 10/22/27 $100,250.00
$2,246,985.88
DAIN RAUCHER-(HRA)
$200,000-FNMA-9334 P/O 7.24% 04/20/93 03/25/23 $17,800.76
$250,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 08/28/02 08/28/17 $250,000.00
$1,700,000-GENERAL ELECTRIC COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.082% 11126/03 02/23/04 $1.695.533.30
(DECERTICATION-KENZIE TIF) $1,963,334.06
TOTAL BOOK VALUE $8,704,187.45
-----------------
-----------------
Time12112/2003 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT NOVEMBER 20031NVESTI
November-2003 City of St.Anthony
Profit&Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I** SAV II STONEHOUSE* 11130/03 11/30/02 (Decrease)
Sales $0.00 $260,590.00 $0.00 $3,843,799.00 $4,532,783.00 ($688,984.00)
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $0.00 $207,593.00 $0.00 $2,880,056.00 $3,232,880.00 ($352,824.00)
Gross Profit $0.00 $52,997.00 $0.00 $963,743.00 $1,299,903.00 ($336,160.00)
Ratio to Net Sales 20.34% 25.07% 28.68%
Operating Expense:
Salaries,Wages, Benefits $0.00 $24,942.00 $0.00 $470,481.00 $619,469.00 ($148;988.00)
All Other Expenses $637.00 $28,306.00 $228.00 $358,250.00 $474,546.00 ($116,296.00)
Total Operating Expense $637.00 $53,248.00 $228.00 $828,731.00 $1,094,015.00 ($265,284.00)
Ratio to Net Sales 20.43% 21.56% 24.14%
Profit from Operations ($637.00) ($251.00) ($228.00) $135,012.00 $205,888.00 ($70,876.00)
Other Income $0.00 $550.00 $0.00 $22,092.00 $52,578.00
($30,486.00)
Net Income ($637.00) $299.00
($228.00) $157,104.00 $258,466.00 ($101 362.00)
Ratio to Net Sales 0.11% 4.09% 5.70%
November-Net Income ($566.00)
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 11/30103 $62,331.00 $93,527.00 $1,246.00 $157,104.00
YEAR TO DATE 11/30102 $108,936.00 $106,138.00 $43,392.00 $258,466.00 Audited
INCREASE/DECREASE ($46,605.00) ($12,611.00) ($42,146.00) ($101362.00)
*Stonehouse On-Sale Closed 5/30/03
**SAV I Off-Sale Closed 8123/03
November -2003 City of St.Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I - SAV II
Beginning Inventory: $0.00 Beginning Inventory: $255,798.93
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers: SAV 1 $0.00 Transfers $0.00
Stonehouse $0.00 Adjustments ($75.98)
Adjustments $0.00 Returns to Vendors ($2,275.91)
Returns to Vendors $0.00
Add: Receiving $0.00 Add: Receiving $249,696.61
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $0.00 Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($207,571.22)
TOTAL $295,572.43
TOTAL $0.00
Total per Valuation Report $295,730.11 ***
Total per Valuation Report $0.00
Difference $157.68
Difference $0.00
Beginning December 2003 Inventory $0.00 Beginning December 2003 Inventory $295,730.11
2002 Actual Profits (Audited) 2003 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAV I SAV 11 Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Stonehouse Profits Comparison
January $5,583.00 $2,817.00 $3,554.00 $11,954.00 January $6,588.00 $3,381.00 $2,657.00 $12,626.00 $672.00
February $6,023.00 $6,005.00 $9,656.00 $33,638.00 February $4,782.00 $4,181.00 $8,714.00 $30,303.00 ($3,335.00)
March $10,455.00 $10,709.00 $7,145.00 $61,947.00 March $10,491.00 $7,536.00 $10,935.00 $59,265.00 ($2,682.00)
April $7,341.00 $6,511.00 $10,932.00 $86,731.00 April $10,095.00 $5,921.00 $10,938.00 $86,219.00 ($512.00)
May $10,901.00 $14,402.00 $6,374.00 $118,408.00 May $13,695.00 $10,574.00 $8,193.00 $118,681.00 $273.00
June $15,589.00 $16,045.00 $1,586.00 $151,628.00 June $12,616.00 $12,675.00 ($6,792.00) $137,180.00 ($14,448.00)
July $8,989.00 $9,839.00 ($7;247.00) $163,209.00 July $11,914.00 $12,453.00 ($3,652.00) $157,895.00 ($5,314.00)
August $18,973.00 $11,447.00 $2,001.00 $195,630.00 August ($1,166.00) $18,776.00 ($12,599.00) $162,906.00 ($32,724.00)
September $6,675.00 $6,725.00 $4,695.00 $213,725.00 September ($5,297.00) $12,398.00 ($17;149.00) $152,858.00 ($60,867.00)
October $4,618.00 $6,750.00 $402.00 $225,495.00 October ($750.00) $5,333.00 $229.00 $157,670.00 ($67,825.00)
November $13,789.00 $14,888.00 $4,294.00 $258,466.00 November ($637.00) $299.00 ($228.00) $157,104.00 ($101,362.00)
December $8,179.00 $26,775.00 $8,684.00 $302,104.00 December 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $157,104.00
Total $117,115.00 $132,913.00 $52,076.00 $302,104.00 Total $62,331.00 $93,527.00 $1,246.00 $157,104.00
Increase/(Decrease) ($46,605.00) ($12,611.00) ($42,146.00) ($101,362.00)
Y-T-D By Store
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
January 6, 2004
Call to Order
Roll Call
I. Approval of January 6, 2004 H.R.A. Agenda.
II. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which
event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve December 8, 2003 H.R.A. Minutes. (p. 1)
B. Claims. (p. 2)
C. "Housekeeping Resolutions" (pp. 3 -7)
1. HRA 04-001, re: Designate Chair for HRA.
2. HRA 04-002, re: Designate Vice Chair for HRA.
3. HRA 04-003, re: Designate Secretary/Treasurer for HRA.
4. HRA 04-004, re: Designate Commissioners for HRA.
III. Public Hearings.
IV. General Policy Business of the H.R.A.
V. Staff Reports.
VI. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments.
VII. Information and Announcements.
VIII. Adjournment.
01
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
3 DECEMBER 8, 2003
4
5 CALL TO ORDER
6 Chair Hodson called the meeting to order at 9:25 p.m.
7
8 ROLL CALL.
9 Commissioners present: Chair Hodson; Commissioners Sparks, Thuesen, Horst, and Faust.
10 Commissioners absent: None.
11 Also present: Executive Director Michael Mornson.
12
13 I. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 8, 2003,H.R.A. AGENDA.
14 Motion by Commissioner Faust, seconded by Commissioner Thuesen, to approve the December
15 8, 2003, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
16
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18
19 H. CONSENT AGENDA.
20 Motion by Commissioner Sparks, seconded by Commissioner Faust, to approve the Consent
21 Agenda, which consisted of:
22
23 A. H.R.A. Meeting Minutes of November 25, 2003; an d
24 B. Claims.
25
26 Ayes—3. Nays_0,Abstains—2 (Horst,Thuesen). Motion carried.
27
28 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
29 None.
30
31 IV. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
32 None.
33
34 V. STAFF REPORTS.
35 None.
36
37 V. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
38 None.
39
40 VI. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
41 None.
42
43 VII. ADJOURNMENT.
44 Chair Hodson adjourned the meeting at 9:26 p.m.
45
46 Respectfully submitted,
47
48 Marjorie R. Jenkins
49 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
12/30/2003 14: Check Register GL540R-V06.56 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK## DATE AMOUNT
HRA1 HOUSING & REDEV CHECKING
007256 BELAIR BUILDERS, INC. 5293 01/07/04 12,318.65
009007 CD TILE & STONE 5294 01/07/04 342.00
008985 C70 ASSOCIATES 5295 01/07/04 5,000.00
008667 DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW AND U 5296 01/07/04 1,428.07
000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 5297 01/07/04 15,537.05
008698 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC 5298. 01/07/04 13,088.75
008990 F.M.FRATTALONE EXCAVATIN 5299 01/07/04 23,831.70
009002 FABCON, INCORPORATED 5300 01/07/04 52,351.65
008892 GOODWIN COMMUNICATIONS G 5301 01/07/04 285.00
009003 GRESSER COMPANIES, INC. 5302 01/07/04 15,352.00
009001 KRAUS ANDERSON CONSTRUCT 5303 01/07/04 47,675.00
009011 SGO ROOFING & CONSTRUCTI 5304 01/07/04 1,738.50
009010 THURNBECK STEEL FABRICAT 5305 01/07/04 4,079.30
009008 UNITED STATES MECHANICAL 5306 01/07/04 23,348.15
009009 WHITE BEAR ELECTRIC 5307 01/07/04 4,750.00
008273 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5308 01/07/04 8,734.15
HOUSING & REDEV CHECKING 229,859.97 ***
CD
N
03
REQUEST FOR HRA CONSIDERATION CJ�°"�" tho
ilia C�
Report Date: December 15, 2003
Meeting Date: January 6_,.2004 Agenda Section: II.C.1 - 4
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Housekeeping resolutions for first HRA meeting in January,
2004
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REVIEW:
Attached are Resolutions 04-001 - 04-004.
Vice Chair Secretary/Treasurer and Commissioners area appointed annually. Because
rY PP Y
the HRA consists of the Councilmembers that list is the current Councilmembers. Below
is a list of the Vice Chair and Secretary/Treasurer, as appointed by the HRA:
2000 Thuesen, Vice Chair Horst, Secretary/Treasurer
2001 Horst, Vice Chair Sparks, Secretary/Treasurer
2002 Sparks, Vice Chair Horst, Secretary/Treasurer
2003 Faust Vice Chair Horst, Secretary/Treasurer
Mic ael Mornson
Executive Director
®4
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
H.R.A. RESOLUTION 04-001
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A CHAIR FOR THE
ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED, that Randy Hodson is designated as Chair of the City of St. Anthony
Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Chair
Reviewed for Administration:
Executive Director
®5
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
H.R.A. RESOLUTION 04-002
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A VICE CHAIR FOR THE
ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED, that Brian Thuesen is designated as Vice Chair of the City of St. Anthony
Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Chair
Reviewed for Administration:
Executive Director
06
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
H.R.A. RESOLUTION 04-003
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A SECRETARY/TREASURER
FOR THE ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED, that Richard Horst is designated as Secretary/Treasurer of the City of St.
Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
Chair
Reviewed for Administration:
Executive Director
07
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
H.R.A. RESOLUTION 04-004
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COMMISSIONERS FOR THE
ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED, that Randy Hodson, Brian Thuesen, Richard Horst, Jerome Faust, and
Randy Stille are designated as Commissioners of the City of St. Anthony Housing and
Redevelopment Authority.
da
Adopted this y of 92004.
Chair
Reviewed for Administration:
Executive Director
Apache Plaza Redevelopment 1211512003
Total Costs Since Inception
Payments from Developers:
Hillcrest Development $72,920.43
Met Council Grant $120,000.00
Pratt-Ordway $274.937.01
$467,857.44
Total Expenses $706.980.23 12115aW3
Cost to HRA 1$239.122.791
Dahlgren
Sherdlow _ Ehlelg8 AstxWtes WEB 8�15Wtes jiacv,Prinlin�_ JMS Commu I Ins North 1Le Lines__ SEH/RCM Goodwin Comm Dorsey&Whltnev LBH Enalnners
E7,402.72 $210.00 {^ $2,714:50 f $1,391.00 I $990.00 $308.00 $455.87 $1,815.00 $2,062.50 $592.03
$3,937.81 $1,505,00 j $954.50 i $1,450,00 1 1 $1,925.00 I 572.00_ 1743.93 $570.00 $1,483.00 $2,184.89
$7,002.88 $935.50 I $954.50 1 $1,098.70 X2090,00 468.00 $2,199.80 $1,140.00 $4,899.00 $4,545.67
$15,138.86 $455.00 $942.00 1 1 $474.20 $2,260.00 $848.00 $95.00 $1,742.50 $10,615.96
$32,762.90 ! §82.00 $282.00 s i $1,09810 $1,320.00 $570.00 $5,194.90 $10,211.86
$25,780.22 I $1,662.90 I $860.00 1 i
1 1 $1,098.70 $T70.00 $190.00 $9,806.50 $10,T79.16
$10,603.04
i $2,911.73
1064156410,_._. j $1,098.70 $9,355.00
$18'21
7. $38,929.57$6,369.70 $1,920.55 $5, 1.03 $1,168.60
$15,68606 $3,450.00 $1,045.00 $51'�9
0 . , . . $1,995.00 $94
4.20__„__ 1,330.00
$31,1 821 $3,187.50
$498.50 $1,141.12 $9,975.00
$5,733.98 i $2,787.50 $658.00 $1,261.15
$1,490.12 ! h__$5.471.77 _ $1,091.00 $1,434.2 5
$560.13 $2,662.50 $508.50 $13,434.45
$1,774.75 $3,750.00 $94.00
$2,567.32 $4,717.50 $188.00
i $3,754.23 $3,653.50 $106.00
1:-----.-----$160300.___.._....; $4.065.00 $106.00
$1.645.50 $3,900.00 $2,088.20
$5,539.18 $4,385.63 $1,187.33
$9,796.85 $5,850.00 $4,571.50
$11,660.14 $6,052.50 $265.00
$2,359.63 $5,587.50 $1,814.00
$221.92 $637.50 $9,277.50
$1,733.97 $3,342.54 $160.00
$2,429.72 $2,287.50 $1,431.00
$6,387.25 $2,137,50 $318.00
$7,019.47 $7,275.00 $636.00
$740.46 $656.25 $336,00
$552.29 $7,156.25 $62,626.76
$1,7&5.63 $2,816.25
$239.25 $8,362.50
$251.11 $2.318.75
$1,356.22 $3,360.00
$1,828.75 $6,168.75
$2,479.50 $9,000.00
$7,695.92 $22,256.25
$16,695.20 $1,968.75
$61.00 $393.75
$7,280.49 $17,940.00
$10,543,22 $6,045.00
$282,892.13 $8,812.50
$150.00
$4,895.50
$192,284.12
Pratt-Ordway $274,937.01
Shaded Area Represents Before Pratt-Ordway Agreement Less:Expenditures ($444,436.08)
Retainage Balance ($169,499.07)