Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 07152003 Meeting Sheet IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII 102897 BOX: 27 Folder: PL PACKETS 2000-2004 Document: PL PACKET 07152003 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA JULY 15, 2003 7 p.m., Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC INPUT Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 6. MEETING'MINUTES 6.1 Review and Approve Planning Commission Minutes of June 17, 2003 7. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL 7.1 Designate a Planning Commissioner to the July 22, 2003 City Council Meeting 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8.1 Autumn Woods II, LLP, 2534, 2538, 2542, 2546, and 2548 Kenzie Terrace, Amend the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for an additional 38 units of adult rental housing. 8.2 Amcon Construction, 2900 Kenzie Terrace and 2700 Highway 88: (a) A conditional use permit for a proposed restaurant, which is less than 250 feet from a residential structure or district; (b) A conditional use permit for a proposed on-sale liquor store; (c) Two front yard setback variances of 30 feet for a proposed setback of 5 feet at the building corners; (d) One rear yard setback variance of 10 feet for a proposed setback of 10 feet at the southeast corner property line jog; (e) Parking variance of 40 stalls for a proposed 40 parking stalls for a sit-down restaurant; and (f) Administrative subdivision request. 8.3 City of St. Anthony, 3501/3505 Silver Lake Road: (a) A conditional use permit for a proposed fire station, which is located in a R-1 single family-zoning district; and (b) One front yard setback variance of 11 feet for a proposed setback of 19 feet. 2 Page 2 July 15 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS, cont'd 8.4 City of St. Anthony, 3801Chandler"Drive: - (a) Two front yard setback variances of 28 feet and 21 feet for a proposed setback from the front property line to the northwest corner of the building of 13 feet and from the property line to the primary facade of 18 feet; (b) One side yard setback variance of 10 feet for a proposed setback of 5 feet off the property line for the existing Public Works building; (c) One rear yard setback variance of 4 feet for a proposed setback of 11 feet to allow the backside of the proposed salt building to align with the rear elevation of the existing Public Works building; and (d) One variance to allow for the proposed use of a supported membrane structure for the use of salt storage and loading. 8.5 Health Care Plus, Inc., 2500 Highway 88, #105, a conditional use permit for an adult day care facility. 8.6 Northgate Condominium Owner's Association and LeRoy Sign Co., 2500 Highway 88, Sign Variance Requests: (a) An 8 foot height variance to allow for a 16 foot sign; (b) A 10 foot setback variance to allow for a 5 foot setback from the driveway; (c) A variance of 16 square feet to allow for a sign surface area of 96 square feet for two copy surfaces; and (d) A variance for a pylon sign. 9. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 4 5 June 17, 2003 6 7:00 p.m. 7 8 9 I. CALL TO ORDER. 10 Chair Melsha called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 11 12 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 13 Chair Melsha invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 14 15 III. ROLL CALL. 16 Commissioners present: Chair Melsha; Vice Chair Stille, Commissioners Hanson, Hoska, 17 Steeves, Stromgren, and Tillman. 18 Absent: None. 19 Also present: Assistant City Manager Susan Hall. 20 21 IV. PUBLIC INPUT. 22 Hearing no comments, Chair Melsha moved forward with the agenda. 23 24 V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA. 25 26 Motion by Commissioner Hanson, second by Commissioner Hoska, to approve the meeting 27 agenda as presented. 28 29 Motion carried unanimously. 30 31 VI. MEETING MINUTES. 32 6.1 Review and Approval Planning Commission Minutes of May 20, 2003. 33 Motion by Commissioner Hanson, second by Commissioner Tillman, to approve the Planning 34 Commission meeting minutes of May 20, 2003. 35 36 Motion carried unanimously. 37 38 VII. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL. 39 7.1 Designate a Planninp, Commission member to the June 24, 2003 City Council Meeting, 40 Chair Melsha indicated that Commissioner Hoska was available to attend the next City Council 41 meeting on June 24, 2003. 42 43 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 44 8.1 Request for Side Yard Variance Dave Stepan, 2813 36th Avenue NE. 45 Chair Melsha opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. 46 47 Susan Hall stated that Dave Stepan, property owner of the single-family residential lot at 2813 48 36 th Avenue NE, is requesting a side yard variance of 13 feet for a proposed distance of 32 feet Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 2 1 from the curb for proposed addition. 2 3 Ms. Hall noted that the City's single-family residential zoning code states that a side yard 4 adjacent to a street must be at least 30 feet wide. In addition, it is a standard city requirement to 5 allow for an additional setback of 15 feet for the easement. Given this, Mr. Stepan must be a total 6 of 45 feet allowance from curb to the new addition along Belden Drive. She advised that the 7 sketch plan from Mr. Stepan shows a proposed distance of 32'2" from the curb. He is asking for 8 a side yard variance of 13 feet. The proposed bedroom addition measures 16 feet by 16 feet. 9 10 Ms. Hall noted that Mr. Stepan points to the undue hardship as not having the accommodations 11 needed. The need, explained in a letter from the applicant, is that an addition will make for an 12 acceptable living situation for his family. He goes on to explain the corner lot City requirements 13 restrict him from adding on needed space and is asking for reprieve for his circumstances. 14 15 Dave Stepan, 2813 36`h Avenue NE, stated that he has the original drawings of his home as it was 16 originally built in 1951. He provided the Commission with an overview of the plans. Mr. Stepan 17 reviewed the original plans with Commission. He reviewed the location of the house on the lot 18 noting that the only logical location for an addition would be on the north side of the house. He 19 explained that he is requesting a variance for additional room and space for his family. He 20 reviewed the plans stating that he would like to add 16' x 16' room, to be located on the north 21 side of the house, closest to Belden Drive. He explained that he would need a total of 45-feet for 22 the addition. He stated that currently it is 34-feet from the house to the curb noting that any 23 addition to the Belden side of house would require a variance. 24 25 Mr. Stepan reviewed his understanding of the variance and setback requirements and asked why 26 corner lots are treated differently than lots located in the middle of a block. He explained that 27 without the addition it would create hardship for his family. He reviewed the hardship with the 28 Commission stating that with three growing girls they would need an additional bathroom, which 29 can only done by freeing up one of the bedrooms for an additional bathroom. He stated that this 30 would allow for ample space for his family. He noted that one of the bathrooms is not heated nor 31 does it have hot water. He provided the Commission with a copy of the proposed plan for their 32 review noting that he is presently waiting for a bid from MVP Construction. He referenced a jog 33 needed in the bedroom area and reviewed with the Commission. 34 35 Chair Melsha asked Mr. Stepan to clarify the size of the existing jog. Mr. Stepan stated that the 36 jog is currently 6-inches. Chair Melsha noted that the house is currently within the setback 37 requirements noting that the home was built prior to the current code. He stated that based on 38 current code they are 11-feet out of conformance adding that the Commission would prefer 39 staying within the 11-feet. Mr. Stepan clarified that he does not need more than 10-inches adding 40 that he can accept the changes on the 3-feet. He stated that this would bring it out to the end of 41 the dining room window, which would provide enough space for the addition. 42 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 3 1 Chair Melsha clarified the proposed jog and asked, from an architectural standpoint, what would 2 be sufficient so as to not create a break in the stucco. Mr. Stepan explained that anything from 3 8-inches to a foot would be sufficient noting that the plan shows for an 8-inch jog. He noted that 4 he could go as low as 6-inches. 5 6 Commissioner Hanson asked if the red maple tree in their backyard would have to come down. 7 Mr. Stepan confirmed that the tree would stay adding that the gas line would have to be moved. 8 He clarified that he would discuss this issue with Minnegasco to determine how the gas line 9 could be moved. 10 11 Commissioner Stromgren asked if this would create issues with the location of the air 12 conditioner. Mr. Stepan clarified that the addition would not affect the air conditioner. 13 14 Chair Melsha closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. 15 16 Commissioner Stromgren asked if the application should state the distance from the lot line 17 versus the distance from the curb. He reviewed stating that the existing house is 19-feet from the 18 lot line noting that this is where the setback comes in. Chair Melsha clarified that as long as they 19 are clear in what they are measuring that it should not be an issue. Ms. Hall stated that many 20 people are not familiar with where the lot line is located and assured the Commission that several 21 Staff members reviewed the proposal. 22 23 Commissioner Tillman acknowledged Mr. Stepan's concerns with respect to matching the 24 current stucco and agreed that the jog would make sense. Vice Chair Stille agreed stating that he 25 reviewed stucco homes in the area that do not have the jog noting that you could see the line in 26 the stucco where the addition meets with the current home. He stated that six inches for the jog 27 is very reasonable. 28 29 Commissioner Stromgren suggested allowing 1 foot to ensure proper blocking of house. Vice 30 Chair Stille agreed. 31 32 Motion by Commissioner Tillman, seconded by Commissioner Stromgren, to recommend 33 approval of the request by Dave Stepan, 2813 36`h Avenue NE, for a side yard variance of 11 feet 34 based on the rationale that hardship is street placed after house is built and existing house is 35 already in setback and house would be put to better use with the extra space. 36 37 Motion carried unanimously. 38 39 IX. CONCEPT PLAN REVIEWS. 40 9.1 Concept Design Review of Stonehouse Redevelopment Plan. 41 Susan Hall indicated that the City has entered into a predevelopment agreement with Amcon 42 Construction to redevelop the corner of Kenzie Terrace and Highway 88, also known as the 43 Stonehouse corner. Amcon has submitted preliminary site and building plans for review. She 44 noted that Stacie Kvilvang is here representing Amcon representatives for Planning 45 Commissioners to comment and ask questions of the preliminary site and building plans. Amcon Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 4 1 will likely return to the Planning Commission on July 15 for related public hearing requests with 2 final plans. 3 4 Stacie Kvilvang, Project Manager for the Stonehouse Redevelopment Project, provided the 5 Commission with an overview of the proposed redevelopment plan for the Stonehouse property 6 location and the new Fire station. She pointed out that this location is at a key entrance into the 7 City and they would like to base their design on this key point. 8 9 Ms. Kvilvang explained that the current redevelopment plans show 26,000 total square feet of 10 retail in two buildings, 20,000 square feet in the retail portion and 6,000 square feet for the 11 restaurant pad. She stated that the two buildings would include a new municipal liquor store, a 12 new sports bar/restaurant as well as other tenants. She reviewed the location of the building with 13 the Commission noting that one building would be located on the northern portion of the 14 property, at the corner of Kenzie Terrace and Highway 88, and the other new building would be 15 situated where the existing strip mall is located. She stated that construction at the Stonehouse 16 site would begin in September 2003 and be completed in March 2004. 17 18 Ms. Kvilvang advised that Amcon is in the process of reviewing the City's commercial zoning :9 code. She stated that presently A;ncon would be requesting two conditional use permits, one for 20 the restaurant, as the restaurant is located less than 250 feet from a residential structure or 21 district, which is a permitted conditional use in commercial districts, and one is for the on-sale 22 liquor store, which is also a permitted conditional use in a commercial zoning district. 23 24 Ms. Hall noted that according to the Amcon representatives, it is likely that several variances 25 would be necessary. She reviewed with the Commission noting that, as a backdrop, it is helpful 26 to know that when looking at the site map, Amcon is considering the restaurant corner to the 27 north as the front yard and rear yard would be behind the retail center and the liquor store, to the 28 south. She explained that currently Amcon would be looking for one variance for the rear yard 29 setback and two variances for the front yard setback. She stated that Amcon Construction has 30 prepared a memorandum related to the preliminary site and building plans and that they would be 31 highlighting these in more detail at the next Planning Commission meeting. 32 33 Ms Hall referenced the parking requirements for the restaurant and explained that the amount of 34 parking needed must be no less than the total designed seating capacity of the structure, divided 35 by 2.5, plus one parking space for each employee on the largest shift. She stated that the design 36 of the restaurant has yet to be determined, so the numbers of seats are unknown at this time. She 37 noted that the developer currently shows 40 stalls for the restaurant. She reviewed the retail 38 component stating that there must be at least one parking space for every 300 square feet of gross 39 floor area. 40 41 Commissioner Tillman asked for further clarification for the location of the outdoor dining and 42 seating. Ms. Kvilvang reviewed the location for outdoor dining with the Commission. 43 44 Commissioner Tillman noted that the plan shows an area for trash and asked if this would be for 45 public use or for the restaurant. Ms. Kvilvang clarified that it would be for the restaurant. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 5 1 2 Commissioner Hanson noted that they would be building a new alley way and asked if this would 3 push things forward in order to accommodate the truck loading area. Ms. Kvilvang confirmed. 4 5 Vice Chair Stille asked if the architecture would be integrated amongst the buildings so that the 6 entire corner flows and is compatible with the rest of the area, like the Hitching Post. Ms. 7 Kvilvang confirmed that the two new buildings would match,but that she would have to verify 8 the colors. 9 10 Commissioner Hanson referenced seven additional retail sites on the blueprint and asked for 11 further clarification. Ms. Kvilvang explained that the additional retail would be ancillary 12 businesses and reviewed with the Commission. 13 14 Chair Melsha asked if there were any lighting plans such as fixtures and parking lot lighting 15 available for review. Ms. Kvilvang stated that the lighting plans would be available for review at 16 the next Planning Commission meeting. 17 18 Vice Chair Stille asked if there would be a landscaping plan. Ms. Kvilvang confirmed that there 19 would be extensive landscaping and reviewed with the Commission at the next meeting. 20 21 Vice Chair Stille asked if a sidewalk along the street would be integrated into the plan. Ms. 22 Kvilvang stated she would check with the developer if they could accommodate the sidewalks 23 along 88`h and Kenzie Terrace. 24 25 Commissioner Hanson asked where the trucks to the liquor store would be able to access. Ms. 26 Kvilvang explained that the trucks would access from the back of the retail area. 27 28 9.2 Concept Design Review of Proposed Public Works Facility Plan. 29 Susan Hall advised that the City is moving forward with the reconstruction of the Public Works 30 Facility. To this end, Oertel Architects has prepared the site plan. It is anticipated the final plans 31 will be presented at the July 15 Planning Commission meeting with the associated public 32 hearings. 33 34 Jeff Oertel, Oertel Architects, stated that the project has been very fluid in last few weeks. He 35 provided the Commission with a revised site plan for their review. He explained that Public 36 Works has several components. He stated that in addition to the new building they would also 37 build a salt stand and storage building. He explained that regulations require that all salt be 38 covered noting that this is included in the current plan. He stated that they decided, as a team, to 39 save the latter half of the existing building in order to reduce the overall costs while retaining the 40 highest level of square footage. He stated that they have determined that there is a need to 41 include a holding pond. He noted that they are not required to do so by the Watershed District, 42 adding that it would be good policy for the drainage. 43 44 Mr. Oertel reviewed the variance requests with the Commission noting that two curb cuts are 45 being proposed. He also reviewed the curb cuts noting that one cut would provide in and out Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 6 1 access to the south and a wider curb cut that would be exclusively for entering the building. He 2 stated that they are going to try to cut the grade back in order to provide a better view of the 3 building. He reviewed the main entrance to the site with the Commission noting it would be 4 located on the south side of the building. He explained that they are also proposing 20 vehicle 5 spaces and reviewed the parking with the Commission. He reviewed the building materials 6 noting that the main body of the building would be a precast concrete panel both inside and out. 7 He stated that at the most visible part of the building they would use burnished block and for a 8 decorative element they are proposing metal panels along the top of the building and along the 9 sides noting that it would match with the rear portion of the building. He stated that 10 approximately 80% of the building is a flat roof and 15-20%is pitched. 11 12 Chair Melsha clarified that there is only one variance. Mr. Oertel reviewed the variance requests 13 and explained that the variance would be for the front of the building at the northwest comer, 14 providing that the existing building can be grandfathered. He reviewed the existing fueling 15 system stating that they are proposing to set it back further on the site. 16 17 Chair Melsha asked if the gas island would remain at its' current location. Mr. Oertel explained 18 that they are trying to keep it in the current location for cost reasons noting that there is a 1.9 possibility that they might be asked to move it. 20 21 Commissioner Hanson asked if there are any concerns for fire protection if they were to move the 22 existing gas line closer to the lot line. Mr. Oertel explained that the decision to move the gas line 23 occurred over the last couple days adding that the Fire Chief would have to approve the 24 conditions and provide guidelines. 25 26 Chair Melsha asked what is located to the east of the building. Mr. Oertel explained that to the 27 east is residential and garages for the apartments. 28 29 Chair Melsha asked how close the garage structures from the adjacent property would be to the 30 proposed gas line. Mr. Oertel stated that he would have to review the area. 31 32 Chair Melsha asked if fencing is included in the proposal. Mr. Oertel explained that fencing has 33 not been decided yet due to the budget. He explained that the fencing would probably be a 34 combination and that they would have it ready for their review at the next Planning Commission 35 meeting. 36 37 Commissioner Stromgren asked if a conditional use permit is required for the fuel lines. Ms. 38 Hall stated that she did not think so but would verify for the Commission. 39 40 Commissioner Stromgren referenced the cold storage and asked for further clarification. Mr. 41 Oertel explained that they are proposing to integrate and upgrade the current systems. He 42 explained that they are currently reviewing a salt/sand building that would be a self-supported 43 membrane structure. He stated that he would provide pictures for their review at the next 44 Planning Commission meeting. He reviewed the proposed materials with the Planning 45 Commission stating that the building is a half circle, arch structure that has a fabric that would be Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 7 1 supported by a steel frame. He stated that the appearance is similar to an old 1940's style 2 building that would be very linear. He explained that salt sand buildings are highly corrosive and 3 that it would be impossible to use metal or wood. 4 5 9.3 Concept Design Review of Proposed Fire Station Plan. 6 Susan Hall informed the Commission that the City is moving forward with building a new Fire 7 Station. To this end, Oertel Architects has prepared the site plan. She advised that it is likely one 8 front yard setback variance and a conditional use permit will be necessary. It is anticipated the 9 final plans will be presented at the July 15 Planning Commission meeting with the associated 10 public hearings. 11 12 The Fire Station would be constructed at 3501/3505 Silver Lake Road, which is zoned single- 13 family residential. City buildings, including fire stations, are allowed by permitted conditional 14 use. The Fire Department would be relocated to a temporary location while the new station is 15 being constructed. 16 17 Mr. Oertel reviewed the variance requirements with the Commission noting that the plan has not 18 changed too much from what the Commission had in their packets. He explained that there 19 would be a one-story building for all equipment and a two-story building for staff, dorm rooms, 20 conference and training. He noted that Silver Lake Road is very busy and that they are trying to 21 address safety issues by providing a single way to get in and out noting it would be cyclical flow, 22 primarily for safety. He explained that they chose the highest spot on street for the exit as it 23 provides the best visibility. He stated that the most current plan shows the existing trees and 24 vegetation noting that they would like to lower the vegetation for better visibility towards the 25 front of the building. He referenced the parking locations noting that the Staff parking would be 26 located on both sides of the building. 27 28 Mr. Oertel stated that the Mayor recently requested that they review the possibility of including a 29 community area in the building that would have a multi-functional purpose for the public. He 30 explained that the addition would require more space and bathrooms and reviewed the 31 requirements with the Commission. 32 33 Chair Melsha asked why the building could not be moved further east. Mr. Oertel explained that 34 they are trying to minimize the costs noting that it becomes more complicated as the move farther 35 down the hill. Additionally, with the amount of construction involved, the subcontractors would 36 require more room to work around the building. 37 38 Commissioner Tillman reviewed the line of trees along the parking lot and asked if this line of 39 trees would be kept intact. Mr. Oertel explained that they are trying to keep as much of the trees 40 and vegetation as is possible. 41 42 Commissioner Tillman asked where the pump house would be located. Mr. Oertel stated that the 43 pump house would be located approximately 150 feet south of the building. He noted that there 44 are a few mature trees at the center of the site that may have to be removed adding that they are 45 currently reviewing all options. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 8 1 2 Commissioner Hanson referenced the property value of the homes in the area and asked how if 3 the values would be affected. Mr. Oertel stated he does not believe that the fire station would 4 have a negative impact,but actually a positive impact as some people feel safer near a fire 5 station. 6 7 Chief Hewitt stated that they have scheduled a neighborhood meeting on July 9, 2003. He 8 explained that this would provide an opportunity for the residents to express their concerns and 9 discuss the impact it could have on the area. He stated that the fire station does not impact 10 neighborhoods negatively adding that they would do their best to be a good neighbor. He 11 acknowledged the noise levels noting that they are currently reviewing options for sirens and 12 traffic control. 13 14 Commissioner Hanson asked why they chose to face the building to the south versus the west and 15 suggested using the existing drive to pull the trucks around. He referenced the long brick wall 16 noting that it is rather boring to look at and asked if any other options had been considered to 17 enhance the appearance. Mr. Oertel stated that they are reviewing the possibility of coming 18 down from the park area. 19 20 Commissioner Stromgren agreed with Commissioner Hanson's concerns regarding the brick wall 21 stating that it appears blank along the face of the building. He suggested that they consider 22 something to break up the mass of brick on the one wall. Commissioner Tillman agreed and 23 suggested additional landscaping and vegetation. Mr. Oertel acknowledged their concerns 24 stating that they have had considerable discussion regarding the appearance of the building. He 25 explained that the discussions included using a pattern within the brick to give it a more 26 appealing look. He agreed that the current image is more service oriented and simple. 27 28 Commissioner Stromgren referenced the roof forms noting that they are curved and appear 29 forced. He stated that the roof does not relate to the rest of the neighborhood architecture and 30 asked for further suggestions. Mr. Oertel agreed stating that this is in a state of flux right now. 31 He stated that they feel good about the elevation for the actual apparatus, that they are 32 comfortable with the sod and noted that the roof forms are changing. He stated that the final 33 product would probably change from the present plan. 34 35 Commissioner Hoska referenced the Mayor's request for a community area and asked for further 36 clarification. Mr. Oertel stated that they are sticking to the two-story theme noting that they plan 37 to extend further south to accommodate the training room and extend the kitchen. 38 39 Chief Hewitt referenced the gas line for the proposed location noting that moving the fueling to 40 the east side of the site would not cause a problem. He reviewed the location with the 41 Commission stating that he would refer their concerns to the Fire Marshall for a review of any 42 potential code violations. 43 44 Commissioner Hanson asked for update on the temporary location for the Fire Station. Chief 45 Hewitt reviewed the process they took to determine an interim location with the Commission. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 9 1 He stated that it was important to locate a site that could be fully utilized without additional 2 costs. He stated that they have to vacate the current building by September 1, 2003 and relocate 3 to a temporary location where they would reside until the new fire station has been completed. 4 He stated that they plan to begin construction in May, with a plan to occupy the new site by May 5 31, 2004. He explained that there is also a need for enough space to store their apparatus and 6 they want to minimize any negative impact to the operations while maintaining quality service 7 and response time. 8 9 Chief Hewitt reviewed their options with the Commission stating that they reviewed each 10 location for ground level access, the cost to bring in a manufactured home for office and living 11 space, utility costs, and storage. He reviewed the costs for each option stating that they also 12 considered housing at other fire station locations. He stated that they considered both Columbia 13 Heights and New Brighton as options noting that both locations would greatly affect their 14 response times and it would also increase their viability exposure if something critical should 15 occur. 16 17 Chief Hewitt stated that they recently found the Construction 70 site located in the Industrial park 18 and reviewed with the Commission. He stated that the location has room for all three apparatus 19 in addition to adequate living quarters, office space and storage. He stated that it is their 20 preference to relocate at the Construction 70 site, as it would provide quality quarters for the 21 firefighters, eliminate the heating and weather concerns. He stated that they are requesting 22 approval for ten-month lease for the facility, offices, apparatus storage building and a punch-in 23 for an 11-foot by 14-foot door. 24 25 X. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION. 26 27 Ms. Hall reviewed the July agenda with the Commission. She stated that it would include a 28 proposed sign plan from Northgate shopping center; LaNel is coming forward with the Autumn 29 Villas with a Public Hearing scheduled in July for the PUD; the Fire Station and Public Works 30 plans would be on for public hearings in addition to the Stonehouse Redevelopment Project. A 31 TIF plan will be on for review. Finally, the Northwest Quadrant Redevelopment Vice Chair 32 Stille asked if the proposed sign plan is a review. Ms. Hall clarified that it is the real thing as 33 they are very anxious to move forward. Ms. Hall explained that they are considering a large 34 pylon sign noting that with their location they feel they need a higher, more visible sign. She 35 stated that the application was recently received and Staff is currently reviewing the application. 36 Ms. Hall explained that the City is moving away from the traditional ground sign and welcomed 37 any suggestions from Commission. She explained that based on the current assessment the sign 38 is too high proportionally and lacks landscaping. She stated that they would discuss these issues 39 with the applicant prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. 40 41 XI. ANNOUNCEMENTS. 42 Chair Melsha asked Ms. Hall to contact the City Attorney to further clarify issues when altering 43 an existing structure. Ms. Hall clarified that there is a section in the ordinance that does address 44 this issue and reviewed this fact with the Commission. Chair Melsha noted that the ordinance Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003 Page 10 1 would probably apply to the Public Works building but not to Mr. Stepan's. He asked Ms. Hall 2 to forward any comments to the Commission for their review. 3 4 Vice Chair Stille asked Ms. Hall to clarify the side yard and front yard differences with the City 5 Attorney with respect to Amcon. 6 7 XII. ADJOURNMENT. 8 Motion by Commissioner Stromgren, second by Commissioner Hoska, to adjourn the meeting at 9 8:40 p.m. 10 11 Motion carried unanimously. 12 13 14 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 17 18 Bonnie Sullivan 9 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. MEMORANDUM DATE: 07/07/03 MEETING DATE: 07/15/03 TO: Chair Melsha & Planning Commission Members FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Autumn Woods PUD Amendment Requested Action: President Paul Brewer of LaNel Financial Group, representing Autumn Woods II LP, met with Planning Commission members at the December 2002 meeting concerning their preliminary plans for construction of a housing development called Autumn Wood Villas slated for the 2500 block of Kenzie Terrace. They are returning with final development plans on July 15 for a public hearing to amend their existing PUD for an additional 38 units of adult rental housing. Background: LaNel Financial Group proposes to develop a market rate senior rental townhouse style building on the former city-owned single-family lots of 2534, 2538, 2542, 2546, and 2548 Kenzie Terrace. The plan submitted by the developer shows a total of 38 units with 1 and 2 bedroom units, along with various common activity and recreation areas. There will be both exterior and interior entrances to units. Autumn Woods II has requested to- amend its existing (adjacent) Planned Unit Development (PUD). A PUD offers flexibility for both them and the City. In exchange for not meeting typical code requirements, the City might ask for extra landscaping or lighting, for example. There is give and take in a PUD arrangement. The proposed building will have three stories with 35 underground parking spaces. In addition, seven surface parking spaces are shown on the site plan. For apartments buildings, City code requires at least two parking spaces per unit, at least one of which is enclosed. By this, the developer is short three enclosed parking spaces, plus an additional 31 parking spaces. With a PUD, the developer is not required to have this amount of spaces; however, the information is given as a backdrop to typical city requirements. The developer should speak to why the proposed number of parking spaces is enough to fulfill the needs of the development. Another code requirement related to parking of note is that there must be a firewall between every four parking stalls. The development plan shows an encroachment into the side yard setback, although Autumn Woods does own the adjacent property. All other required typical setbacks are met although with a PUD keep in mind there is departure from the strict application of such requirements. A big advantage of a PUD is that it can maximize the development potential of land. According to the developer, the apartments will have individual entries to the street and courtyard on the first floor and also to a center hall that will access the underground heated garage. The building exterior will closely match the adjacent and existing Autumn I Page 2 —Autumn Woods PUD Amendment Woods development. The entire development will tie together well, according to the developer. LaNel has forwarded the attached final plans that include the site plan, floor plans and unit plans, elevation showing exterior materials, rendering of elevation, and a landscape plan. In terms of a PUD, some of the following should be considered as it relates to the plan: • Street/circulation pattern for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles • Architectural standards • Landscaping • Lighting • Miscellaneous: trash, maintenance, etc. Staff Recommendation: The developer has proposed an excellent fit with the adjacent Autumn Woods development. Staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment. Attachments: • PUD Amendment Application • Site Plan • Floor plans and unit plans • Elevation showing exterior materials • Rendering of elevation • Landscape Plan FIN AL GROUP June,17,2003 Sue Hall Assistant City Manager St. Anthony Village 3301 .Silver Lake Rd. St. Anthony,MN 55418 Re: Autumn Woods H—Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment ' Dear Sue: Enclosed please find an Application for plan unit development in regard to the,above-entitled project including the following: 1. .Application Fee and Consultants deposit of$700 2. Site Plan overlaid on a survey of Autumn Woods Apartment's adjacent to the proj ect 3. Preliminary site plan 4.. Floor plans and unit plans 5. Elevation showing exterior materials . 6. Rendering of elevation T am also enclosing a summary description of our project, which describes,the units, square footage, common areas, and site area. We would like to bring this before the planning commission on July.15t". We are in the process of engaging a civil engineer who will provide information concerning the storm water retention and drainage plan. We will also be replatting Autumn Woods Subdivision into two lots. One is for the current Autumn Woods and one for the new Autumn Wood Villas. 4601 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 601 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416"N 952-920-5338■ Fax 952-925-5640 Sue Hall Page 2 of 2 June 17; 2003 Please let me know if you need any additional information. Very truly yours, LANEL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. Paul G. Brewer President PGB:mc. Enclosures CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (or Amendment to PUD) Page 1 of 2 DATE RECEIVED p APPLICANT Autumn Woods II LP PHONE 952-920-5338 FAX 952-925-5640 E-MAIL paul@lanel.com PAGER CELL# ADDRESS 4601 Excelsior Blvd. , Suite 601 CITY St. Louis Park STATE MN ZIP 55416 FEE OWNER AND CONSENT OF APPLICATION will be Autumn•:-Woods II LP ADDRESS same as above PHONE FAX CITY STATE ZIP LOCATION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN PUD REQUEST (Address/Pin Number/Legal Description) See attached legal description PRESENT ZONING R-1 LAND ACRES INVOLVED 1 + acres PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION single family PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY multifamily PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY adult rental housing a APPLICATION FEES: A. $500.00 $ 500.00 B. Park Dedication Fee, as applicable $ B. City Consultant fees initial deposit: $200.00 $ 200.00 700.00 TOTAL AMOUNT RECEIVED $ CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (or Amendment to PUD) Page 2 of 2 DATE RECEIVED THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE UPON REVIEW OF APPLICATION AND NECESSARY MATERIALS BEING SUBMITTED. . 4!:� — i7 - o3 APPLICA T SIGNATURE DATE PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE (If different from Applicant) DATE CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Exhibit A Legal Description 2534 Kenzie Terrace PID: 07-029-23-23-0008 That part of the Northwest ''/4 of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23 described as follows: Commencing on a line drawn parallel with and 193.7 feet North of the South line of said Northwest ''/4 at the point at which said line intersects a line drawn South 38 degrees 16 '/z minutes East from a point on the Southeasterly line of the Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road which is Northeasterly 526.96 feet, measured along said Southeasterly line, from its intersection with the South line of said Northwest `/4;thence West along said line drawn parallel and 193.7 feet North of the South line of said Northwest V459.72 feet'to the actual point of beginning; thence Northwesterly deflecting to the right at an angle of 50 degrees 01 minute a distance of 48.8 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the left at an angle of 91 degrees 01 minute a distance of 6.15 feet; thence Northwesterly in a straight line a distance of 86.3 feet, more or less, to a point on said Southeasterly line of said road 473.52 feet measured along said Southeasterly line from its intersection with the South line of said Northwest '/4; thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly line 1.63 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said Southeasterly line with said line drawn parallel with and 193.7 feet North of the South line of said Northwest %4; thence East along said parallel line to the actual point of beginning. 2538 Kenzie Terrace PID: 07-029-23-23-0007 That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence east along the South line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 371.37 feet to the Southeasterly line of the Old St. Anthony&Taylor's Falls Road; thence North 51 degrees 43 ``/z minutes East along the — Southeasterly line of said road 473.52 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing North 51 degrees 43 %z minutes East along said road line 53.44 feet; thence South 38 degrees 16 '/2 minutes East, 172.7 feet, more or less, to an intersection with a line drawn parallel with and 193.7 feet north,measured at right angles, from the South line of said Northwest Quarter; thence west along said parallel line so drawn 59.72 feet; thence northwesterly deflecting to the right at an angle of 50 degrees 01 minutes a distance of 48.8 feet; thence southwesterly deflecting to the left at an angle of 91 degrees 01 minutes a distance 6.15 feet; thence northwesterly in a straight line 86.3 feet, more or less, to the actual point of beginning, except that part taken for highway purposes. A-1 2542 Kenzie Terrace PID: 07-029-23-23-0006 Parcel 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, bounded and described as follows: Commencing at the West Quarter corner of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23 (at the intersection of the center line of Lowry Avenue Northeast and Stinson Boulevard); thence East along the East-to-West Quarter line of said Section 7, 371.37 feet to the Southeasterly line of the Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road; thence North 51 degrees 43 '/z minutes East along said Southeasterly line 526.96 feet to the westernmost corner of the tract herein described; thence North 51 degrees 43 %Z minutes East 50 feet along said Southeasterly line; thence South 38 degrees 16 %minutes East 208.36 feet, more or less, to a point 193.7 feet perpendicularly North from said East-and-West quarter line; thence West 63.69 feet parallel to said East-to-West quarter line; thence North 38 degrees 16 1/2 minutes West 168.91 feet, more or less,to said most Westerly point of tract; EXCEPTING therefrom that part which is included within the following- described tract: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the Southeasterly line of Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road at a point distant 526.96 feet Northeasterly along same from the intersection with the South line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence at right angles to the Southeasterly line of said Old St.-Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road, Southeasterly a distance of 150 feet for the point of beginning of the land hereinafter described; thence continue Southeasterly on said above right angles line projected a distance of 22.76 feet, more or less, to a point distant 193.7 feet North of and at right angles to the South line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7, thence Easterly and parallel to the South line of said Northwest Quarter of said Section 7 to th e point of intersection with the West line of the plat of"St. Anthony Village Commercial Center Addition No. 1"; thence North along said West line of said "St. Anthony Village Commercial Center Addition No. 1" to a point distant 150 feet measured at right angles from the Southeasterly line of Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road;thence Southwesterly parallel with the Southeasterly line of Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road to th e point of beginning. Parcel 2: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point in the Southeasterly line of the Highway known as Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road as originally laid out, which point is distant 265.97 feet Northeasterly measured along the Southeasterly line of said road from its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 193.7 feet perpendicularly North from the South line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said road a distance of 8 A-2 feet; thence at a right angle Southwesterly a distance of 8 feet; thence at a a right angle Northwesterly a distance of 150 feet to the point of beginning. 2546 Kenzie Terrace PID: 07-029-23-23-0005 That part of Section 7, Township 29, North Range 23, West of the 4`h Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at a point in Southeasterly line of Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road distant 584.77 feet Northeasterly along road from its intersection with South line of Northwest 11/4; thence Northeasterly along road 60 feet; thence Southeasterly at right angles 150 feet; thence Southwesterly at right angles 60 feet; thence Northwesterly 150 feet to beginning, except State Highway, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2548 Kenzie Terrace 07-029-23-23-0004 That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 29, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the Southeasterly line of Old St. Anthony and Taylor's Falls Road, distant 644.77 feet Northeasterly along said road line from its intersection with the South line of said Northwest Quarter, thence Northeasterly along said road line 60 feet; thence Southeasterly at right angles 150 feet, thence Southwesterly at right angles 60 feet, thence Northwesterly at right angles 150 feet to beginning, excepting the Northwesterly 7 feet thereof taken for highway purposes, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A-3 AUTUMN WOODS SENIOR HOUSING ` z DESCRIPTION AREA FIRST SECOND THIRD TOTAL PER CENT m (S.F.) FLOOR FLOOR FLOOR BUILDING m IA TYPICAL ONE BEDROOM 829 2 3 3 8 21% m 1B ONE BEDROOM CORNER(HDCP) 827 I 1 3% m SUBTOTAL-ONE BEDROOM 3 3 3 9 24% C) r 2A TWO BEDROOM AT CORNER(END UNITS) 1,189 4 4 4 12 N 2B TWO BEDROOM AT ENTRY 1,186 1 2 2 5 0 2C TWO BEDROOM-INTERIOR 1,076 3 3 3 9 2D TWO BEDROOM-INTERIOR(SPLIT) 1,145 1 1 1 3 z cn SUBTOTAL-TWO BEDROOM 9 10 10 29 760/a o m c TOTAL BUILDING 12 13 13 38 100% MAIN FLOOR 17,111 o SECOND FLOOR 16,826 THIRD FLOOR 16,997 TOTAL 50,934 N 1,340 st per unit H Ul p4 N � tD x7 .A P4 N ' A z � o to c -7 m v 0 0 06/16103,03-.46:33 PM filename:lotus\files\l 0216aut\mix06-13-03.123 0 N wE LEGEND 0 20 40 80� CIlltS T �' .// °`� s / ()P .A fp01�• s O'Brien + PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE / - GAS Strother � /. GAS GAS GAS ARCHITECTS PROPOSED DECIDUOUS ORNAMENTAL TREE / PROPOSED ' /BPS MONUMENTO / „ow m,6,�,,,� / SIGN / a`r " .K PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE G" N +0 w--s6- ZR❑POSED ® PROPOSED EVERGREEN SHRUB / CURB CUT < \ TORY BRICK 0 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SHRUB / ° o I 3 S N° 258 - PROPOSED PERENNIALS/ANNUALS G AS \ GAS LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS + DROP OFF c GAS ` PROPOSED BUILDING = 38 UNITS / �' �� GAS 15 TREES REQUIRED PER MINIMUM TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS + o A CAT 25+ UNITS = 12 TREES REQU ry IR \ GAS 1 TREE PER 5 UNITS OVER 25 UNITS = 3 TREES _ ►' ► / �11 NEW SPACES TOTAL = 15 TREES MIN UM o u ►► 0 CN T A E D D 7) MINIMUM TREE SIZE = 1.75 INCHES MEASURED 12 INCHES FROM GROUND ` I NOTE: / + J GRAIN IG \ \ ®CAN EXISTING TREE AND VEGETATION NOT SHOWN. FINAL PLAN TO PRESERVE EXISTING TREES CND \ Lr: P = VEGETATION TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT > FEASIBLE. ALL AREAS OTHER THAN AUTUMN PLA TING BEDS RE TO BE SODDED• AREAS + \ e / ' + WOODS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE _ G� j ';3 PHASE RETURNED TO A CONDITLON EQUAL TO OR / �� D Y — r BETTER THAN PRIOR PTO CONSTRUCTION. 2 / \ / L + _ _7' / —4 PRELIMINARY 25' FTBAC LANDSCAPE PAAN SCAPE 2 crew m Imi I1p At 4 Ipjl!/11 / I LEC 80 sal o / LEC BOX Ll I I ; Gluts O'Brien Strother ARCHITECTS "WftA"MW rrumwU nm®rewclrAm �mn Om = am_an_ ASPHALT SHIN&LE5 T- I U LAP 51DIN6 r z 41 �: a�. �_. _ _. _Y ran -':r S r r •_..... _... ---- LAP 51DI T: _ r u r-- y. ' r LAP SIDING , M _ - - _ _ t IL � e _. _ _ — v _...:.__- --- .F BRI K _ - - - - C - ---- .._.... ._.-- � �� _- - _ _ } �i X � �i � �.� - '� � ��• .11'11111^© � � -__ _ � • _ � LL 1 1 1 1 AUTUMN STONE BRICK BRICK WOODS SCREENED PORCH - TYP. SENIOR HOUSING NORTHWEST ELEVATION ITT DR IMMON MLUM kA ,U2,&00 n1m ,WPM A3.1 0 8 16 32 FT �° IM T3 7*7,F `r ,etr .• - '- 2 :'*<-. - .; - 'OS�sr_ r'',.,` _ r•; *v on ., _ _ °.V , !R.�'r,.,. -:� n3,a .„•'7i '.,.<+e.-......_..-r.rs. H.. ..<. Y _.. ...._:.. _„.. .1.”.... :.:� :... Y` ?:. Z ..,�r. a. '�\`. .�.. ,. - ,� +_Y, .�..�z ...:.m.-. :rd'.._`t\..-..G .:_ e 1 .._1 _...,.,,•.. :+., ,t,. .?,. �..,.: .l�Y +3 Q'yd-y� �-� Pr :'pk e. :�. - .:.x ( ,..e�� A.M.Q.�`---. � i'v-.o:l .:.:•.: .« .:�... .:_ :... .:.. ._: �'." .S S �,4 �tsi -R �' - :..t - , �,}3 . _ ,..r>� �. :r ',l- -. '..= „- -: .. :�. .:: .. is ,l 3.., Y-`A?,�� nK. r�•K4 G .1..y'4 �+.. ` �.x.'. h },� w : -c '� r �: - ..e;- rr�,,p� x s-',,!sl r .� .`�- ..�F- � _ •r'i=,<{. �i Ar- ,y t.. .,_.. .ti r a.. •.., ._�.. $ e >�-� - _ :.4_ .:r,L ?-'' -dam _ '""�"+ a. _ _ T Or n��;,. J ,rr. e� G jt,•' �,, �S„;!:'.'�.�,e dam. > ''- .� -�� �z.. y p� Oft E� + � nv¢x ±} } - kx �k k � P •a .:. Ira • 1 �. Y _I a'n, r,r.�{ .. � {;iS�ct,-,,�-:iY•.. -�' }:c *mtt..�S t � V7 _ r�._ >t �,, yas� �' 'r•L' ' . I � S '`_,� C�"��'t a<� is ,��''Y'�Iu•'°,���-'-<S�,Y`s,g`;n =':.�` $ �s a � 1`> 7 � �F r ''� t I i/,c�`<,« ;c=. _ { - r.- ': n !3:-, 2,�r.:3`•'>r "i. �ErEJ 2�z � �'� i!..:.� ry, .. � �'- ;'`s "z:�aC�--��,�.��' 4'� Say__ ..��q .Z*;°t � s�Y�'3��<yry,�.�•�k��rs�3 ,.�'f•"'�•\.,s � � _ �” �' �• sx, _ �'1'��^�j�k tF'�=��E..'�;;- ,�:.�''8�" �t_�..� •''�s� +'�'`}•R7"=�5 - £"3"� Y" �. ,�. ti � � *-:.kr� yR Y {/i-�s v � •/1 ,�}' a "YY ,.. we r yl li �• �� {q� �:. �d a � _ •Lit � _ 41.:J' le� ;,N" i t 4 J. Amp, yq rR 4 �.� �y,.,1.'' -'}V... �I,�.,) �z z: ,.�. _.., -.,,�' �`"1 r�,: �r. i tq", r1-i •:I (r�; - . xK;_ u f } < 7� t ;-F.. .. �y� �...z. S - '�j. q,�r.�r,�''��',� _,r: '��>1 r-t 1.` = t •r 1 d• I� ,•,x' tl , ..: - -•'�`'y.-�sf,. .r � � F. ,: .; � �(-., ,,......� n,rum -.:", {�, '°,,. "q h-a - ,,^ t..1'.,r-. ,. - � r '�,.,, �c,S�ri .�x.-'-' - -. a i=��.-S.fi.z,,,,T!::'£. a�yi. c.- '�'••' -Z., -<y' r,..T?�.-4` .,q4-1 - a>•- - 4 .4`.r'F ...;,_. -� �''�i>,..e�,.'-' (�„- � - .�"�. µ '7 s:. v"° _. _ ti aiT, ,. ..f'Cr a'b.j-`a�,�,-•. gx rte,•_ .r;;y� ? -0 .ti.F•.• / { iW��y�, F>.- - — _ i., ,:,:��^'� �9 -r''�_':K�?:-: 1 / �-'•�""-^-. 7 �9+ r. _.ys: '{''ho-., ,«-`c�"">' _ r f_,..- l f i �,-,. .::- ;a',z,:-. (/� �,F, _ �, s f ,,., :• "�-''='z ' ,sue.; _ � t R r t� - :-< i ,:mss ,.'�.d ;:m.�- y •h. { - n;s',"r e I _ S ' et : r - / _ NE Eli _... ._ - - - .i „ S 'lit II r , , 'i ACV? �t•,a a a-' _:.. .. ..�.. _ < _.: -. f .. .. ._: fi. �,r, fiu: :,.ci� yr s; '2 2. _ ,.. •:� .?e .,,. +. _.. ...- -< .., � r .. -. .�,x5 '..... ..>a,,.. .. ..n -.: ._ at k'* m•`y 's >�" a, xr . 1!7• . - t �.< .,- � >,r...hr, r..K:a1X _ k. :: , y^,�i oi%�`.. - '-{ rY.. _�i` ea �} �3�. ...►kss• - .F � ...a.,.:. ..... ,T^ �h?z.. } _. ... }'a ;,�,may.s • �`� .,�. - "=s �r - C--a�'•r'� ����F'�t'�'"..e,Saa,�:�•�a'�' :.. � .=.�tis;�s'>�`�` '��� '�,....k1 aid: ..SGa. a�..=1d�,.a.�,6. su'=..�.s�''�- � - ., ;< c s at<wa-. ..;�i?"-L `�'S..w.''�'i�\ntar�z.._._::'L'>t?'_.i.•e.;.::u.:.,��?'��.s'�.a'x,e-'` �.c`.f'.�.• ''�'.'�'t-�...�.rs -•...: �:.arr `�'vi.�=asx.."'�r<.F,�� Y<a..,.,..,_ / III / I �' , / I I Gluts / I I O'Brien II Strother I I ARCHITECTS 0 50 100 200 FT a R taoo9 I /' G// /` of 4 s /'l. — • \xf. a 5gka�5 as/ ,Con I I I wcm <4 o > wDmM �-,+ ,y � �a® �[a um n ewrr / � E �. � 'b �� 1 t-JZSB'S9" � �,.,� ,. 4 /P c. I I s�ri70�o no i w►au wm®wear mo9 0[ Lwl 7•[®[ft 1�1� PROPOSED 38 UNIT / �w��t BL a CR roP 3 STORY APARTMENT `� / f GAS BUILDING WITH / ✓ . �� +I I`�-� I _ - ` I" UNDERGROUND PARKING / ►e. l e l I I � a I°' wa�m BUILDING N—No CB \- N 3 STORY BFY I 5A Rao/ / ro - a �\ ''� 4`w•_ 'Y� r' J STCRY BRICK BUILDING `\ No. 2600 ------ ` 80 jugw-9ea 1 Parking Slays ----- / 01/� . , � AUTUMN wO0 cJS 907000 w a' I P` -- - PHASE a �jiiP3// `\ co `-- --- 4. J` h P. — , + � \\\�, r eL.cK rpB\ -----------——--------- I d O r r� .);mss. / i 1 I I car—cat—w—ws rrr--1 �✓��} V_ Nr�ryrp / // —''—' ' ' L is, I •I 3-59057000'w 609.99x— -,—'—S rLtlN R;..Os—Yo, Ap4grElp..�cU+nru armw020t r — - L. — I MAW I .�n A0.2 ♦ ' '" =< Cluts ESE= O'Brien _ Strother ARCHITECTS 0 20 40 80 FT - - - - - S - ,�WXW K=OWE m mm PROPOSED - --- MONUMENT r,ersr,no>NO 1 r e ou 'PR❑POSED +C �, CURB CUT DROP F OFF 'II NEW SPACES / WET ADD 7) _ - .............. r` AUTUMN WOODS SENIOR HOUSING -4 PRELD NARY 25' SETBACK I PHASE 2 RETAINING WALL / �.®7DD1 �lu 1=61D Imlaw A0.3 i 25-4 I I I I I Cluts O'Brien MAID/ Strother ry m I MEG \ ARCHITECTS _ 75MW OLVE I OR MM'M FA vww 4 I I I I I I �`MISAMU ��>a, N us a nE sca a nem► 35 GAR5 I 'm I I I I TRASH -ow O . ------ --- - --- • 1 EL -- ---------- I " __ ----- ---.._,._......._.._.._ 1 .............. ............._._.... , l _ AUTUMN WOODS SENIOR HOUSING s F 0 10 20 40 FT ----- ---- ---- ----- _--- �- _------ MR no `� I GARAGE -- I -- MEGH � 1■t Q 10416M1f I A °0 21'-0° 25'-4" 21.-0. .m Q , i s 189'-4' I �-�---e--s--�-__ • Y-4' 34'-8° 9'-0" 28' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — a.._n — — — — — — — — — -r---s— — — — — — — — — — — u----°. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ' -- • • i-.._ i I I Clutsh �. — -I_ _ _ _ I– I- _ _I I j O'Brien 2A IA 2C 2B I j Strother 2 BR I BR 2 BR 2 BR I ARCHITECTS EDI �„� D ------ -------• ' I ,I®1 cm 4i 11L Rq mow® \ I I owe,r•ae,r.m IN \ OFFICE I •k�AU�09ih1M161dR�------• \\ I !\C1iINdI�A1-fA6 EL \ FIARLOR 2A 26 20 M. -- 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR I BR I I ......-_.. .........._._._. \ COMMUNITY RDOM I \` \ _ • \ -� ' flfl 20 _ _ \ 2 DR IA \ �\ AUTUMN WOODS III.IIIII II 1 IIII1111 \ 11j1114L1y I Q SENIOR \, \ HOUSING i 0 10 20 40 'KT s= _.............--------._......_.._..--_ \\ e 2A 2A e • --• ' o 2 BR 2 BR/ FmR Ar \ r \� \ \ Al 108-II ; ;_ __' • i ° C1utS ' I - i ►.:= O'Brien 2A IA 2G 2B Strother ' 2 BR \�I BR 2 BR 2 BR v ARCHITECTS f D � ®. m ♦ . Pit _- o € r _ �sr��n� r»ar°m x • II!GI 19 OR IF OEM ' ..M�-:.i:. :fir;G ny - F__'f',. _ __ �f} - \ •_— --_. .— • s n • i \aWMrvu-2.= z- - _s �. o o- � ; 2A 2G 2G AM- R 2B ,� 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR GRAFTS 2 BR i IA E - - - - IBR , 20 ° -- ,u- _E .. — 2 BR IA - —I 4 AUTUMN ' c v 44H41 I 4 WOODS SENIOR HOUSING S 0 10 20 40 FT - - - e 2A N 2A 2 BR 2 BR FM _ PICT mn n 11216.w 11t o 10Y76Wf ' '° A1.2 188'_11° • _ , --_� • •-- •--• •--•- i—i Cluts t :- O'Brien 2A _- IA 2c 2B Strother 2 BR I BR 2 BR 2 BR !; ARCHITECTS maim LLLLj LL) - - --- //' 1 C4 � L®O liL IiIR 6 IY®G r 0 _6R \ — X 2A 2G 2G / 2B 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR R 2 B o .D T-2 n 34'-4 IA 20 _ 2 BR IA ° AUTUMN L WOODS SENIOR HOUSING 0 10 20 40 FT 2A 2A ---— - ° 2 BR - 2 BR ° py ° PUN mv�c ,OT,B.W -r 'r ry o ,vt,awr Al.3 • PORCH :281-011 Cluts O'Brien Strother ARCHITECTS 71M MAW PM ow A 11®/cm"1fO AL Ilq .smm xe>w I o e all II •k\MY�OiC\1CQ1lIIIR_..__.....__.._.....e \GIRAMI\AT-1ffi i I 1 RE T ROOM MA TAR BE ROOM _.._ ..... --- t __ _. FIREPL LE .__._...._...... --'-- I i l AUTUMN --- -- \\\ WALK-IN i WOODS p p \\ OL05ET I SENIOR \ I HOUSING I P/A I ONB BEDROOM KITCHEN mm BATHROOM REFR — — — — — — Jr LIN O n tasteao I 0 2 4 8 Fr A2.1 34'-8" Cluts O'Brien �'-O" Strother PORGH ARCHITECTS rFIREPLA NGE INI ROOM •Kviraoo�tmteew—.- -- • MASTER LIVING ROM • BE ROOM ,.M�__-- KITCHEN 4 - FYI RANGE - REFR �\ DRYER I Iv1L.K—IN i I AUTUMN GL05ET I WOODS W'°`S I I SENIOR L- _ _ _ _ _ J HOUSING BATH OM ONE uNff (BORDOM (ONE 7SUS� TYPE 1H 0 s' • Fun- itQ76Wf . 0 2 4 8 FT _ _ . .sw o A2.2 i I FOR:LH ) Cluts O'Brien _ _ Strother ARCHITECTS Mme vua ow �'(Y67)W1 16� , IREPLAGE ............ . - a I I C7 I ROOM �r�1g®aonm�ipr � �� - I L®0 II[WO[6 WBmI i . dCC_6 6 � \WiNF1i1�At-J.dR1 i - - -- BEDROOM #a LIVIN M 6E] —7 — KITCHEN REAR _.... _ RA &E - - - - - - r DRYER LR UTILITY AUTUMN v�ASHER WOODS SENIOR HOUSING LIN MASTER MAST. BATHROOM TWO BRDROOM BATH tj i Conn — LIN \ Q 0 2 4 8 FT U AALK-I N CLOSET i — — ; C25MM m 1021e.0D A2.3 PORCH -- - - _ ...... _ 4 _ Cluts 0 FIREPLACE o O'Brien Strother ..... - _ . ARCHITECTS 7M WAW P=OW _ D INC5 R00 BEDROOM #2 LIVIRC7 ROOM ET .............. i KITCHEN om -- _ REFR _ — — — — — RAN6E ry © © - _ --- DRYER UTILITY WASHER I -' _-_.__._-.__-_ I AUTUMN LIN WOODS MASTE / SENIOR Lr MAST. HOUSING BED ®M . BATHROOM O BATH OLIN o o TWO AT UNIT ZNM TYPE 2B / �r _ KALK-IN m.®n tostaao i nc n 1D71fiVlf <\ OL05ET - - - - 0 2 4 8 Ff pm o A2.4 Nko ------ ...--- PORCH Gluts V-411 O'Brien Strother ARCHITECTS �r 11noxow u n um RMINA somen ae Ne I o rm mm_s n I •KNuwraVm+�—----• RE T ROOM 13EDR OOM #2 -------- io OM _._ ._.-- FIREPLACE , ---- ry I AUTUMN WASHER DRYER WALK-IN I WOODS Q Q \� GL05ET RANEE I r SENIOR © \�\ I HOUSING I I T i KITCHEN I TWO �oM I REFR B HR00 M ATH �g is - - - - - - - A LIN .._.. . _ - - - 0 •it 1021&00 i 0 2 4 8 FT • --__.. _. - -- - -. �o A2.5 I I PORG Gluts 20 " 8'-4" O'Brien Strother ARCHITECTS �WJWPM DW Wi W �•, ,. i r®r®r soc vs wt owl oommaoveia�au m YNw t \gA1�FN1�+17-1.Q16 i RE T ROOM MA5TER MA5TER -- -' �_ - ------_ BEDROOM BEDROOM i .. -_ -_ ___..._.. ---............------- FIREPLACE _....---- .._....-_....-.._ n WALK-I N \\\ WALK-I N i SENIOR OL05ET a © RANGE \\\\ GL05ET I HOUSING I L - - - - - - t D/W i KITCHEN I ° �0 uxxRO°�rr M. BATH i BATHROOM (TWO Taus) I REFR I I TYPE 2D ro 70Y18.W 01 O LIN - - LIN O -- -- - O 0 2 4 8 FT • _ �° Az.6 PORCH Cluts O'Brien Strother ARCHITECTS __ — — 7W��OW z m ,wo m N i�mu,vu vs na M99M ANN=I i nu um r[ 10D I m a tR wm a ire o�_s... ic\AowoV6\wiieux------ ._____...-. \amim+Mt-�.ws MASTER GREAT R O MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM .__......._ _....._.... _ FIREPLACE - _.--- I ! AUTUMN WALK-IN ,�� WALK-IN I I WOODS j GL05ET RaN6E © � GL05ET I HOUSING L - - - - - I - = - - - - - ------ - - rt KITCHEN I -- _.____ ° TWO �OM BATHROOM I M. BATH ! �°� � REFR o TYPE 21 • LIN — — — — — — — — LIN • ,�,�� ru� ,oz,ewr 0 2 4 8 FT A2.7 ----------_....- ___ MAIN COMMON SPACES C SITES Y a DESCRUMON AREA SITE AREA: 54,071 s.f. L COMMUNITY ROOMMTCBEN/STORAGE 1,156 GARAGE PARKING 35 CARS OFFICEISTORAGE 194 SURFACE PARKING 7 CARS (NET) PARLOR 171 CRAFT ROOM 332 TOTAL: 42 CARS MEDIA CENTER 150 EXERCISE ROOM 494 CARD ROOM 150 c TOTAL: 2,647 c L c F i 0 w r W ro y z A A N C C -4 z D h A --i 7D O n D 1 .. r L 06/16/03,03:46:34 PM ° filename: iotus\files\10216aut\mix06-13-03.123 � w MEMORANDUM TO: Members of St. Anthony Planning Commission FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: July 9, 2003 RE: Replat of Stonehouse Property In connection with the proposed Stonehouse Redevelopment, it will be necessary to replat the various parcels comprising the site into one parcel. Since no new lots are being created, the technical requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Code relating to subdivision of land will not apply to the replatting of the property. Therefore, a-public hearing is not required to be held by the Planning Commission on the replat of the property. Procedurally, the new plat can be approved administratively by the City Council by a resolution. The City's practice in connection with plats that combine parcels to create one parcel has been to have the proposed plat reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to its consideration by the City Council. At its meeting on July 15ffi the Planning Commission will consider the proposed replat. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Page 3 —Amcon Construction/Storehouse Redevelopment site. There should be no spillage to the neighborhood. The intensity should measure one foot candle or less at the property line. One other item of note that has come up is sidewalks. The City will be reconstructing the sidewalk along Kenzie Terrace this year as a part of a planned stormwater project, so the sidewalk will remain. Within the development, Amcon said they intend to connect the sidewalks to the buildings. Attached find the final plans submitted by Amcon Construction. They include a site plan, grading plan, utility plan, landscape plan, floor plan, and exterior elevations. According to the developer, it is anticipated construction at the site will begin in September and be completed in March 2004. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the above requests, keeping in mind the impact on the adjacent/nearby residential neighborhoods and commercial property. Attachments: • Applications for Conditional Use Permits and Variances • Dorsey and Whitney memorandum • Area Restaurant Parking Requirements memorandum • Amcon final plans Page 2—Amcon Construction/Stonehouse Redevelopment The other conditional use permit is for the on-sale liquor store, which is also a permitted conditional use in a commercial zoning district. Again, conditions can be placed on the store, depending on what is appropriate. Two front yard setback variances are being requested. The variance request consists of two front yard setback variances of 30 feet each for a proposed setback of 5 feet at the building corners. Due to the triangular shape of the parcel, the natural tendency is to develop the site similar to its current layout with the building to the south side and a sea of parking out to the corner. One of the strengths of the design concept, according to the developer, is to reduce the impact of the parking lot and to reinforce the street edge by using the restaurant to wrap around and create a.corner. This keeps the parking central within the site to allow shared use of the parking due to the shifting peak times of the businesses. Amcon has stated they will make an attractive gateway at the "front yard" entrance to the development. One rear yard setback variance of 10 feet is being requested for a proposed setback of 10 feet at the southeast corner property line jog. According to the developer, due to a job in the property line at the southeast corner of the site, the rear yard setback is greatly reduced (by approximately 35 feet). The triangular shape of the site creates a natural siting of the retail, building to the south property line. This property line jog reduces a comfortable building to property line dimension from 45' to 10'. The final variance request from Amcon is related to parking. The developer is requesting a parking variance of 40 stalls for a proposed 40 parking stalls for a sit-down restaurant. The developer says the proposed parking assumes a lower total requirement than the City code requires. City code states the amount of parking needed must be no less than the total seating capacity of the structure divided by 2.5, plus one parking space for each employee on the largest shift. The proposed restaurant will have 170 seats. Based on the City's required parking formula, the required number of stalls would total 80. The developer is proposing 40 stalls for the restaurant with the balance to be shared with the retail building. Regarding the retail component, there must be at least one parking space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area, which is 20,000 square feet in this case. The developer shows 67 parking stalls for the retail area, which meets city code. Due to staggered peak business times for retail/liquor store and the restaurant, the centralized parking will maximize the efficiency of the development, according to the developer. There is a commercial shopping center to the south of the site. The owner of the St. Anthony Shopping Center has stated to staff that he does not want to be the spillover parking spot, which is a concern. In the past, staff has conducted research on parking requirements in neighboring cities. Attached please find the memo summarizing area parking requirements. In terms of signage, the developer has told staff they will keep within the limits of the City's sign ordinance. It will all be building/wall signage. The developer has mentioned that the wall signage will consist of backlit logo signs. There will not be a glow to affect the residential area. The developer has mentioned the same goes for the lighting on the MEMORANDUM DATE: 07/08/03 MEETING DATE: 07/15/03 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Amcon Construction/Stonehouse Redevelopment Requested Action: The City has entered into a predevelopment agreement with Amcon Construction to redevelop the corner of Kenzie Terrace.and Highway 88, also known as the Stonehouse and/or Fire Station. Amcon has submitted the formal applications for public hearings associated with their final plans. July 15 is the public hearing for the following: (a) A conditional use permit for a proposed restaurant, which is less than 250 feet from a residential structure or district; (b) A conditional use permit for a proposed on-sale liquor store; (c) Two front yard setback variances of 30 feet each for a proposed setback of 5 feet at the building corners; (d) One rear yard setback variance of 10 feet for a proposed setback of 10 feet at the southeast corner property line jog; and (e) Parking variance of 40 stalls for a proposed 40 parking stalls for a sit-down restaurant. In addition to the above, the applicant requests an administrative subdivision. Although a public hearing is not required at the Planning Commission level, the item should be discussed and referred onto the City Council with a recommendation (see Dorsey and Whitney memorandum attached). Background: Redevelopment plans show 26,000 square feet of retail- in two buildings. The development will include a new municipal liquor store of 9,000 square feet, a new restaurant Spectators at 6,000 square feet, and some other tenants, yet to be named, in the remaining 11,000 square feet. The site area is 2.39 acres. The development will encompass two buildings. One building would be located on the northern portion of the property, located at the corner of Kenzie Terrace and Highway 88, and the other new building would be situated where the existing strip center (see site and building plans attached). The subject properties at 2900 Kenzie Terrace and 2700 Highway 88 are zoned commercial. Amcon will be requesting two conditional use permits. The first one for the restaurant, as restaurants located less than 250 feet from.a residential structure or district is a permitted conditional use in commercial districts. The condition items to consider here might be noise (especially with the outdoor patio), traffic, trash removal, lighting, and hours of operation. It is unknown at this time if the restaurant going in, Spectators, is interested in having music piped out to the outdoor patio. _ n im ei) To: Chair and Planning Commissioners From: Susan M.H. Hall CC: Michael J. Momson Date: 7/8/2003 Re: Area Parking Requirements for Restaurants I polled some of the area cities about their restaurant parking requirements and here's what I found: New Brighton: For drive-in and fast food, 1 spot per 65 sq. feet of floor space; for sit down full- service (cafes, private clubs serving food), 1 spot per 60 sq. feet of floor space, and sit down full service(nightclubs/bars), 1 spot per 50 sq. feet of floor space. Fridley: 1 parking space for every 100 square feet of floor restaurant floor area, they exclude bathroom, hallways, and prep/storage area for the square footage. Columbia Heights: For fast food (convenience) restaurants: 6 plus 1 per 40 square feet of dining service area, plus six stacking spaces for each drive through lane. 1 Date: Fee: S 130.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Applicant: C-r4 Phone. g52 $90, M1-1 Address: ern v4*-s< A►w.A,-lAtj Fes, gu -r�tsd r�,c,�, M a 55 33::j Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.): 'FaU' kj::: Street address and/or legal description of property in question: Zoning district in which property is located: G caul p-AU c—mnAfc.kaL. art- ,-cam Conditional use proposed: I. L.. k aoaIf �%ro ; �Ib35.�3, mv% h� -2--.12�SSP�-�LdT� ��-,s►G'�c. r$6�.t�.�ps�.tc. c.�_ ,�s"_iy�,i�-t�oa l «v 35. 03 , r1�w �-. '�j P� Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied before a conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using additional sheets, if necessary. 1} The proposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning district in which it is to be located. 2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property'values or improvements in the vicinity. �.P1t.aLrN4 f'A►5'r•%N4-o %JS*-S 3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community. Signature of applicant: Date: `O/17/03 —10,2� Fee: 700 • D R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00 Other . . . . $100.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE. Petition for Variance MJC.&A CA- M-tJN Applicant: A M c.o nJ Go N s'rj.i-i Phone: 6c'-L) Address: wts•t A i l- viA.-C +3 ,. 5 5 33'1 Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): Legal Description of property proposed for variance: Street Address: Presently Zoned: G. C.Lok!jj- L C.�^n�nE,g-c.�ac. p�st�2►c,-r' Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if necessary. 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the parcel or lot, the proposed variance. would relieve an undue hardshiP, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly enforced. 2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. Signature of Applica Variances. (1665.06) Application. An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply with the Zoning Code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed to be constructed, may apply for a variance upon payment of the fee as specified in the Zoning Ordinance. Council Approval. Variances to.the dimensional provisions of the Zoning Code may be granted by the Council upon recommendation of the Planning.Commission, after a public hearing is held by the Planning Commission. Variances will not be granted with respect to uses. A majority of affirmative votes by the Councilmembers present is required to approve a variance request. Evidence. No variance.will be granted unless the evidence presented by the petitioner discloses all of the following facts: (a) The subject matter of the application is within the scope of the Zoning Ordinance subsection regarding variances. (b) Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship because: 1.) The property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. 2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the owner. 3.) The variance, if granted; will not alter the essential character of the locality. 4.) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship. (c) The circumstances.causing the hardship are unique to the individual property under consideration. (d) The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission will consider the application at a public hearing at any regular or special meeting. Notice for the public hearing will be given in accordance with Section 115 of the City Ordinance. The Planning Commission, sitting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, will make a recommendation to the Council as follows: (a) Recommend that the variance application can be granted because the evidence considered at the meeting supports each of the findings Var5ance irequest To: City of St. Anthony From: Michael Monn CC: Date: 06/16/03 Re: St. Anthony Village retail(former Stonehouse site) Variance Request#1: Due to a jog in the property line at the southeast corner of the site, the rear yard setback is greatly reduced(by approx. 35'). The triangular shape of the site creates a natural siting of the retail building to the south property line. This property line jog reduces a comfortable building to property line dimension from 45'to 10'. We are requesting a variance in the rear yard setback from 20'to 10'for this length of wall(approx. ,40') Variance Request#2: Due to the triangular shape of the parcel,the natural tendency is to develop the site similar to its current layout with the building to the south side and a sea of parking out to the corner. One of the strengths of our design concept is to reduce the impact of the parking lot and to reinforce the street edge by using the restaurant to wrap around and create a comer. This keeps the parking central within the site to allow shared use of the parking due to the shifting peak times of the businesses. In locating the restaurant building on the corner, we are requesting a variance from the front yard setback of 35'to a setback at the building corners of 5' Page 1 200 West Highway 13 Burnsville,MN 55337 JUN-26-2003 08:04 AMCON CONSTRUCTION CO 952 890 0064 P.01 post-its Fax Note 7671 Date Za�J (C_ pa9�To From Mot co�oept. co. Date: �- Phone 0 Phone $2 130�J—S3� Fee' Fax a R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00 Other . $100.00 CI'T'Y OF ST. ANTHONY V ELLAGE Petition for Variance N1t��,of.l_ MoNN Applicant: aMc-0a was �.�cTlor-� Phone: 2 SRd - 121 Address: 2!n� Ws-sr At ,13 � MN 5533- Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): Legal Description of property proposed for variance: Street Address: Presently Zoned.: c cg j t.. Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied for approval of this request. PIease respond to these conditions using additional sheets if necessary. 1. Because of.the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the parcel or lot, the proposed variance would relieve au undue'hardshin as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly enforced. o s>< 2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is -caused b�e_City Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. Signature of A t nq -nq -03 �.p?p � ®.`E JUN-26-2003 UU:04 HMUUN GUNSIKUUI 1UN UU dye uub4 F'.02 0 O 'O PV V C r i ri J`I V aIrO nce Ire¢{uest To: City of St.Anthony Pmrwc Michael Monn CC: 06/26/03 BRM St.Anthony Village retail(former Stonehouse site) Variance Request#1 The proposed parking assumes a lower total requirement than the City ordinance requires. The proposed restaurant will have approximately 170 seats. Based upon the requirement of dividing this number by 2.5 and adding one stall for each employee on max.shift,the required number of parking stalls would total 80. We are proposing 40 stalls for the restaurant with the balance to be shared with the retail building. Due to the staggered-peak business times for retail/liquor store and the restaurant the centralized parking will maximize the efficiency of the parking lot. We are requesting a variance in the total parking requirement for the restaurant from 80 stalls to 40 stalls- Pagel 200 West Highway 13 Burnsville,NIN 55337 TOTAL P.02 0 0 Memo To: Sue Hall,Assistant City Manager City of St.Anthony, MN From: Michael Morin CC: Date: 7/9/2003 Re: Project narrative St.Anthony.Anthony Village Retail Center Center The proposed development is located at the convergence of Kenzie Terrace, St. Anthony Boulevard and County Road 88. The project replaces the existing Stonehouse restaurant, St. Anthony Village liquors and the Fire Station along with some additional retail space. The project is a 2-building scheme with the main building located approximately in the same location as the existing center along the southern property line and a proposed restaurant building located at the northern point of the site. The two buildings are designed to front to the three bordering streets and wrap the comer. The restaurant building has been located to define the street comer and replace the sea of asphalt that exists today. The parking has been located between the buildings to maximize the efficiency of use and reduce the visual impact of asphalt on this prominent corner. Access to the site will be direct off of Kenzie terrace or via the south frontage road along County Road 88. The main building is to be a single story with 20,000 s.f. of retail space. The tenants will consist of a new 9,000 s.f. municipal liquor store(to replace the existing SAV liquor on this site), with the balance of the building to be a variety of smaller retail users yet to be determined. The restaurant building will be a single story,6,000 s.f. sports bar&grill. The Architecture of the two buildings will be primarily brick&stucco with a variety of facade elements to give more interest to the building elevations and create,a smaller scale look and feel. Building services will be primarily in the rear of the main retail building with the restaurant primarily service off hours from the main parking area. Trash will be accomModated by enclosures constructed of materials compatible with the buildings. One enclosure per building. Page 2 200 West Highway 13 Burnsville,MN 55337 Signage for the development will be wall mounted, individual backlit letters mounted on continuous raceways. The signage allocations per the building ordinance are for"one tenant sign per right-of way frontage per commercial establishment' The sign may have no more than 2 s.f. of surface area per lineal foot of business frontage, up to a maximum of 150 s.f. of signage are for that commercial establishment. The total area of all wall signs affixed to a wall may not exceed 15% of the total area of that wall. Main building: 4800 s.f.wall area x 15%=690 s.f. max. signage allowed on the north facade (while we are allowed to use the end exposures, no additional area is req'd.) Liquor store allocation 83 I.f. x 2= 166 s.f.of signage Multi-tenant(max. 7 tenants)7 x 20 I.f. x 2 s.f. =280 s.f. of signage Total signage to be provided= 166 s.f. +280 s.f. =446 s.f. Restaurant Building: 1800 I.f. of wall(north&south)x 15%=270 s.f. x 2 exposures=540 s.f. 150 s.f. of signage per face max. allowed. 1152 I.f.of wall(east&west)x 15%= 172 s.f. x 2 exposures=344 s.f. 150 s.f. of signage per face max. allowed. Total signage provided=3 signage fronts @ 100 s.f. per exposure=300 s.f. Based upon the ordinance,we are providing less signage area than is allowed. End of memo 0 Page 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: 07/9/03 MEETING DATE: 0715/03 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manag SUBJECT: Fire Station Final Plans Requested Action: On June 17, Oertel Architects brought the City's preliminary plans forward to the Planning Commission for a new fire station at 3501/3505 Silver Lake Road. July 15 is the public hearing for two requests related to the final plans: (a) A conditional use permit for a proposed fire station, which is located in a R-1 single family-zoning district; and (b) One front yard setback variance of 11 feet for a proposed setback of 19 feet. Background: The property at 3501/3505 Silver Lake Road is currently zoned R-1 single family residential. A municipal fire station is allowed in an R-1 single-family residential zoning district with a conditional use permit. Hence, conditions may be placed on the use. The proposed use will not be detrimental to health, safety, and welfare of the adjoining properties nor detrimentally affect property values. Based on precedent from adjacent local communities, there is no evidence of deteriorated property values, or a lessening of the quality of life, for those properties adjacent to newly constructed fire stations. The Fire Department is sensitive to the fact they are adjacent to and nearby single- family homes. The design of the building is such that there is cyclical traffic flow on site, with a separate entrance onto the site and separate entrance exit from the site onto Silver Lake Road. Warning lights will be included on the property to warn local traffic and pedestrians of the oncoming emergency vehicles. Finally, it is the goal of the department to minimize noise from horns and signs until well on the road. Fire Chief Joel Hewitt held a neighborhood meeting on July 9 to show the fire station final plans and address concerns. Chief Hewitt will be attendance at the July 15 meeting and will recap the neighborhood meeting. One variance request is necessary to advance the final plans, according to Oertel Architects. It is for one front yard setback variance of 11 feet for a proposed setback of 19 feet. (For information purposes, the two houses currently on the sites are 26 feet from property line to front facade.) This front variance is requested to minimize construction costs associated with building on the sloped grade at the rear of the site and to minimize damage to the large group of trees (from construction activities) at the rear of the site. Page 2— Fire Station Final Plans Oertel Architects has prepared the attached project description memorandum referring to the final plans and renderings. An Oertel representative will be in attendance at the July 15 public hearing representing the City's final fire station plans. Attachments: • Conditional Use and Variance Application • Oertel Architects memorandum • Final plans • Renderings o Date: ( ego03 Fee: $130.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Applicant: G � �'� !'-� L.'° Phone: Address: 3 3° 1 9 : I4ew L,a.L- VA Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.): c) Lj Ker Street address and/or legal description of property in question: 5 IVW We-'e- Zoning district in which property is located: �" I Conditional use proposed: Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied before a conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using additional sheets, if necessary. 1) The proposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning district in which it is to be located. i+ i s a l 1 -u+A a s A �vwi;AM- Wi fi 6ftO u.Se . A Imo, set 2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of Uer ons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values or improvements in the vicinity. See 3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhooc or community. a-lpchQd• � Signature of applicant: C— 4,-'." Z F , Date: ( v 6 3 Fee: R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00 Other . . . . $100.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE Petition for Variance Applicant: CXM S�. Ar*lkw Phone: 6a--7?q-9F81 Address: -330f M Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): 01/►)hP.✓' Legal Description of property proposed for variance: LM 2. 8100 I hrisim AInf of 1 Iocr- llehn'sle AA x. Street Address: 35bl I365 S► OW o Presently Zoned: Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if necessary. 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the parcel or lot, the.proposed variance would relieve an undue hardship, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly enforced. fee 6406W. 2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. See, a faMge) . 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. Signature of Applicant Attachment: Conditional use permit for St. Anthony Fire Department 1. The proposed conditional use is for a fire station, including apparatus bays, sleeping quarters, office space, storage and general use areas. This use is specifically listed as acceptable in this zoning district. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to health, safety and welfare of the adjoining properties nor detrimentally affect property values. Discussion: The design of the building is such that there is a cyclical traffic flow on site, with a separate access or entrance onto the site and a separate exit from the site onto Silver Lake Road. This is done intentionally to avoid backing up of vehicles into oncoming traffic. The exit from the site is located at the high point of Silver Lake Road so that vision lines and view are not compromised. Further, warning lights will be included on the property to warn local traffic and pedestrians of the oncoming emergency vehicles. Finally, it is the goal of the department to minimize noise from horns and signals until well on the road. The benefits from having this emergency facility in the immediate local area are self- evident. Based on precedent from adjacent local communities, there is no evidence of deteriorated property values, or a lessening of the quality of life, for those properties adjacent to newly constructed fire stations. 3. This proposed location was determined the most ideal of all available sites identified by an independent task force committee of local residents. This site ranked highest for response time, compatibility with other cities services and related reasons. Specific Variance Requests: Allow a front yard setback of 18'- 9"from property line to front facade: (For information purposes, the two houses currently on the sites are 26' - 4" from property line to front facade.) This is requested to minimize construction costs associated with building on the sloped grade at the rear of the site and to minimize damage to the large group of trees (from construction activities) at the rear of the site. • OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 SAINT CLAIR AVENUE,SAINT PAUL,MN 55105 TEL:651/696-5186 FAX:651/6965188 DATE: June 3, 2003 TO: City of St. Anthony: Susan Hall FROM: Jeff Oertel RE: St. Anthony Fire Station Fire Department Project Description The proposed development includes a new, centrally located 13,800 gross square foot fire station that will serve the entire City of St. Anthony. The building consists of apparatus bays (to house the emergency vehicles), shop areas, offices, dorm rooms, restrooms, trainilg areas and related support functions. A multi-story tower is located at the rear of the building, which includes several balconies. This tower connects to the exit stair, and will be used for training staff and drying hoses. The building features spaces typical of a fire department with full-time and on-call firefighters. Offices, a multiple use training room and sleeping areas are located in a two story wing, which is on the rear or east side of the site overlooking th park. The apparatus bays and shop areas are to the west, located directly off of Silver Lake Road. These vehicle bays are one story in height. The height of the building is under twenty five feet to the top of the parapet, and the hose tower is additional eight feet taller. The building will be quite visible by traffic from either direction, but especially from the south. The site is located at the high point of Silver Lake Road. The existing pump house site to the south is quite open and this allows for long-range views of the proposed building at its primary elevation. For safety purposes, and to minimize disturbance to the residential neighbor to the north, vehicle access is designed primarily in a one-way, flow-through pattern. There are curb cuts off of Silver Lake Road at two locations, very close to the ones that exist for the two residential lots. The north access is essentially the entrance into the building, and the south access is for the exiting of emergency vehicles, along with entry/exit for the community and overflow emergency parking. The site is slightly less than one acre. The terrain slopes down from west to east, with the high point at the street and the low point at the park directly east of the building. Storm run-off will be essentially as exists today, except that a small dry pond and additional storm sewer connections are planned at the rear of the site to assist with run- off. The existing landscaping at the low end, or east, portion of the site next to the park will be retained to the extent possible. Otherwise, new landscaping will be added selectively to other areas of the site. Existing trees will be saved as is possible. A low retaining wall will be included between the rear of the building and the row of vegetation that boarders the park. This low wall (approximately two exposed courses of block) will run north-south, and will break up the steepness of the grade and further assist with lawn maintenance. The exterior facade consists of brick masonry in a deep red color, with accents bands and a lower wall of cast stone. This pre-cast stone is of a tan or buff color. There are glazed window openings and glazed overhead doors for viewing, daylighting and visual access by the public. While the building is basically box-shaped, the front entrance is a one story projection with a curved front wall. There are two types of roof options that may be selected. The less expensive option is of an entirely flat roof design. The alternate is for a flat roof at the apparatus bays, accented with a pair of arch roofs made of standing seem sheet metalwork. If chosen and affordable, the standing seam roof is proposed to be of a deep green color. JLO 2 SAINT fW ANTHONY HOUSE ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ �����■ ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■ENNE■ ■■■■■■ _ ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ Monson ■■■■u ■■■■■■ mosom■ ■■■■■; ■ ■■■■EN _ long" �e■■■� fA SAINT ANTHONY FIRE HOUSE a ;A Ui IOU fA SAINT ANTHONY FIRE HOUSE �sR i 1 F� ter- � - •. - • _ � -. 1'r?� — et SAINT fA ANTHONY HOUSE r. fsjj+� y: _. s - �.. •.>f' � si -�� .cam_-� . SAINT ANTHONY HOUSE (�` St. Anthony Village Public Works Only a portion of one of the existing buildings on site will be re-used. Approximately one-third of the rear portion of existing public works building, 4,650 square feet in size, will be used for storage. All other elements will be demolished as they are of little or no value. The new salt storage building is necessary, environmentally, and is required to control salt run-off. The structure is a supported fabric type, with a barrel vaulted roof made of a colored PVC fabric. The high point of the arch is 25 feet above grade. The structure is 50 feet by 60 feet in size. Existing fencing will be re-used at the rear of the site, and new fencing will be provided at the Police impound area and the front of the site. The east end of the site will include storage bins approximately 4 feet in height which will contain bulk materials. A new chain link fence will be positioned above these bins. If affordable, the bins will be made of concrete, if not, they will be made of heavy timbers. JLO 2 ODD 0 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 SAINT CLAIR AVENUE,SAINT PAUL,MN 55105 TEL:651/696-5186 FAX 651/696-5188 DATE: June 3, 2003 TO: City of St. Anthony: Susan Hall FROM: Jeff Oertel RE: St. Anthony Public Works Building Public Works Project Description The proposed development includes a number of new and existing features, all located on the existing two and a half acre public works site. The new main building is proposed to be 29,700 square feet in size, and will house the majority of the public works vehicles. It will also include maintenance bays, shoFs, staff areas, lunch room, offices, restrooms, storage and related functions. This building is primarily of tilt-up pre-cast panels, and includes a number of overhead doors for access. It is hoped that an exposed aggregate stone and colored matrix within the concrete panels will be the finish for these walls. If costs become an issue, the textured panels will be painted concrete. A flat-roof design is planned and the walls will be 23 feet in height. Attached to the taller concrete shell are shorter storage building wings or saddlebags. These will have low-sloped roofs with metal panels at the exterior walls. Positioned at the front of the building is a lower and more articulated office wing, with a public entry and a separate entrance for staff. This wing has a flat roof, and walls of burnished block, glass curtainwall and metal panels. There will be ample vision glass to monitor the site, obtain daylight and provide desirable views of the outdoors (currently not available at the site). Since public works operations require considerable paving, only perimeter portions of the site will be landscaped. Trees and bushes are planned for the front of the site and site perimeters. The main approach to the site (at the southeast) will include a holding pond, which is designed to contain the storm run-off from the majority of the site. Although this may not required by the local Watershed District, it is considered good policy to include this pond for treatment and delayed flow of the storm water. Other elements on site include a fueling island, fencing, parking, a police impound lot, site bulk storage, a salt storage building and a small utility building which is re-cycled from a portion of the existing building. All of the more unsightly and utilitarian functions are proposed to be toward the center or rear of the site. Jun-25-03 01 : OOP OERTEL ARCHITECTS 651 696 5188 P _02 Rear Yard Selback Section 1640.5 of the zoning code states that rear yard setbacks must be at least 15 feet. The existing Public Works building and the new salt/sand storage are located 1 1 feet off the property line. We require a variance of 4 feet at the rear yard setback. P:X2003 PrajectslU3-13 St.Anthony FirevocsZemack DiH Memo.doc Printed:6/25/2003 Jun-.25-03 12 : 59P OERTEL ARCHITECTS 651 696 5188 P_01 VIM OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 ST CLAIR AVENUE,ST PAUL.MINNESOTA 55105 DATE: June 25, 2003 TO: Sue Hall, Assistant City Manager, Village of Saint Anthony FROM: Oertel Architects RE: Fire Station and Public works set backs and variances MEMORANDUM Fire Station Front Yard Setback Section 1615 of the zoning code, states that the front yard setback must be the greater of either 30 feet or a distance equal to the average of the two adjacent lots. The survey we have does not provide the distance of the set back of the house to the north, but does provide the distance of the two existing houses on the site, which average a :26foot setback. The fire station is set 19 feet off the property line. Therefore we require a variance on the front yard set back of 11 feet, from the greater dimension olF 30 feet for front yard setback. Public Works Department Front Yard Setback Section 1640.5 of the zoning code states that the front yard setback must have a depth equal to the greater of 40 feet or a distance equal to the to the average of the setbacks of structures on the two adjoining lots. The Public Works Department is 12 feet 6 inches off the property line at the closest point and 18 feet ten inches at the primary facade. We require a variance at the front yard set back of 27 feet 6 inches and 21 feet 2 inches. Side Yard Setback Section 1640.5 of the zoning code states that side yard setbacks at interior lots must be at least 15 feet. The current Public Works building is 5 feet off the property line. We require a variance of 10 feet at the side property line for the existing building. P:\2003 Projects\03-13 St.Anthony Fre0ocsZetback Diff Memo.doc Printed:6/2512003 y�. �.��y1���•�� �.� Yom, 51�.,N°'°6a. A_yn',i' .C.��i 3_'C�yI y +t`4 f t' '• �� •�" � r.*,. ' > u - - �+.ili�7l'o%L'tJJ s+--3 4� ''a,-5 r� ui .ar U 'i .. M ys a.J 1e.eU,Sir ^�! _ ..X. GSsisl /ti�jcars/ PTION idts 15, 16 5 17, Block 11, Mounds View Acres Second Addition, = S 4- - � ' Pillage of St. Anthony, Minnesota. . F � tffp th at _th:Ls survey was made under my direct supervision and that' I at z ta;ia lok.stered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. f.w 14 6 k ,y,��1 moo: " 7p�r� � ii.•t _ e �ir _ yWillis�g,,S l}.c�Yes_ R... ;.s.�,� � LL S�'':•R Z•A ykid t�,,w - Es+t. � '-°. � ni Fg fY�•� ���+n-�s � � �'�"? T�3'SS -. Jun-19-03 04 :OOP OERTEL ARCHITECTS 651 696 5188 P _02 Attachment: Petition for Variance: St. Anthony Public Works Site 1. The existing site contains several existing buildings that currently fall well within the minimum setbacks required by St. Anthony. This is the case on the south, east and west portions of the site, side yard, rear yard and front yard setbacks. The requested variance would allow the Public Works Department to build new structures on the site without compromising their use of the site. Operations require larger open areas to maneuver, load equipment, mix salt and conduct ongoing operations. Setting a structure thirty feet or more from the property line compromises operations since the use of the land between the property line and structure is less flexible and usable. Note that efforts were made to minimize the amount of buildntg area adjacent to property lines in the proposed site plan. The amount area in the new buildings, as shown in the proposed plan, that fall within the set back area, is approximately half of the current condition. 2. As noted above, there is no desire to increase property value, but to make use of the site in the same manner as it is used currently. 3. There is no personal or strategic interest on any party to take advantage of this variance other than the un--omprornised use of the site for ongoing operations, as currently -;dsts. Specific Variance Requests: Allow a front yard setback from the front property line to northwest corner of the building of 12' - 6", and from the front property line to the primary front facade of 18' -10". Allow the rear portion of the existing public works building to remain within the currently required setbacks of 15' - 0". The building currently is situated i P - 0" at the rear yard and 5' - 0" at the side yard. Allow the back side of the proposed Salt Building to align with the rear elevation of the existing building at the rear yard: setback of 11'.- 0". Allow for the use of a supported membrane structure for the use of salt storage and loading. The building type features a galvanized structural supporting frame and a fire- retardant colored fabric roof, in a barrel vault configuration. Date: G •G • �0 3 Fee: R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00 Other . . . . $100.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE Petition for Variance Applicant: G ` 34. Phone: fo 12 - �7$� • 689 1 Address: 3 3o t 17;�>Z (��,r �-- •� Ro-a.,A Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): o w ►�•e r Legal Description of roperty proposed for variance: LbfS 15, ley 1'1,810Ck j .MpWAB JP�I x(15 G /eIh, Street Address: 3 Ol Chandler VY Ve Presently Zoned: Liokl+- d a5+na 1 C L-T 1 Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if necessary. 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the parcel or lot, the.proposed variance would relieve an undue hardship, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly enforced. See Gl-�"L1Gh��. 2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. e a dvd. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. Signature of pl' ant i�liTEL7f DE2 � Page 2— Public Works Final Plans Oertel Architects has prepared the attached project description memorandum referring to the final plans and renderings. An Oertel representative will be in attendance at the July 15 public hearing representing the City's final fire station plans. Attachments: • Variance Application • Oertel Architects memorandum • Final plans • Renderings MEMORANDUM DATE: 07/9/03 MEETING DATE: 0715/03 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manage SUBJECT: Public Works Final Plans Requested Action: On June 17, Oertel Architects brought the City's preliminary plans forward to the Planning Commission for an updated Public Works facility at its current location of 3801 Chandler Drive. July 15 is the public hearing for four requests related to the final plans: (a) Two front yard setback variances of 28 feet and 21 feet for a proposed setback from the front property line to the northwest corner of the building of 13 feet and from the property line to the primary facade of 18 feet; (b) One side yard setback variance of 10 feet for a proposed setback of 5 feet off the property line for the existing Public Works building; (c) One rear yard setback variance of 4 feet for a proposed setback of 11 feet to allow the backside of the proposed salt building to align with the rear elevation of the existing Public Works building; and (d) One variance to allow for the proposed use of a supported membrane structure for the use of salt storage and loading. Background: The property at 3801 Chandler Drive is zoned Light Industrial. The Public Works facility has been in its current location for approximately 40 years. The use has been a good fit with the adjacent land uses and properties, which is also Light Industrial and R-4 Multiple Dwelling apartment units. The existing site contains several existing buildings that currently fall within the minimum setbacks required by city code. This is the case on the south, east, and west portions of the site, side yard, rear yard, and front yard setbacks. The requested variances (mentioned above) would allow the Public Works Department to build new structures on the site without compromising their use of the site. Operations require larger open areas to maneuver, load equipment, mix salt, and conduct ongoing operations. Setting a structure thirty feet or more from the property line comprises operations since the use of the land between the property line and the structure is less flexible and usable. There were efforts made to minimize the amount of building area adjacent to property lines in the proposed site plan. The amount area in the new buildings, as shown in the proposed plan, that fall within the setback area, is approximately half of the current condition. In addition to the mentioned setback variances, the plans call for the use of a supported membrane structure for the use of salt storage and loading. The building type features a galvanized structural supporting frame and a fire-retardant colored fabric roof, in a barrel vault configuration. PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT: AA �conE DnkJi: Ala Tm NTHONY VILL E RETAIL Rase 957-®f,t,7 Fm 957-60-.DM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE , MINNESOTA s°� a_ e_ o_ o_ i IA— i- !RESTAURANT ' / ,��F. �• Vii:. �' j ,� / '�:'�: ��\_ � � � �,� F— Y d / - \,�h\�.'_ ,BYO/ % / i\� --. I I• ',( / ` T��`X +1 �' W PROJECT DATA SITE AREA 7-G ACES-APPROX.104,241 S.F. ZONING c-GENERAL CODUEROK ZXMCT �� , � % rl \.ti •/' + sETTDA06 9uwwcs FROM YARD ss f-t Q REAR YARD m r.r � 0 sDE YARD 35(.L (n PAR19 > z RETAIL CENTER �YARD CID IIADO t,. cc REAR YARD 70 lad SIDE YARD t0 iaai •(D\` -•L_i' \ / Q BLmjXN 4am SF. ]5x) IIIJJJ a 1::) ®AL➢w0 COVERAGE PAYING Z W . f) PMMING REOWREVENTS RETAL 40.000 SF.O 1/370 SF.. 97 STALLS - .. .. .. � // `[ �,,�`/ � •�\/\ RESTAIRYR"9.000 S.F.O 1/150 9i.. 4O STALLS � �L TOTAL PALING REONRED 10F STALLS }}> \ / 1 Z \\ p// / / \•\ 4// /• \! ``\\`", '{'/,�/ �\� / TOTAL PALING PROVIDED 120 STALLS Z LI THE DESIGN OF THE RLST.WRAHT WAS 4M 4-8 SEEN WORKED Q O BLIQUOR STORE '\\ HA 1N E . ACOM1S4NAINEPAIXwOEsiWE 0 O HAS ffETI W10E FOR STE DESIGN PURPOSES AND WLL BF CQ LOADI O AREA \ / 9.000 sf. REFINED AS THE CXACT NuY�R OF SEATS.RG B d '\ \` ' �� LJ OETERWtlE0. 0 1/1^1 /\� I• V/ \ kV " PROJECT DATA G1 SITE PLAN \\\\���� '• / i \ i' 1 of 2 GRADING PLAN 2 of 2 UTILITY PLAN COVER Sr-E=: LT LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SITE PLL•1 of \) I �E PLAN PT FLOOR PLAN aT` 6/17j 3 P2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Gl / / P 2804 le 20 1 f � 1,5 979 o / 1 OST L / 1 OOST / 3 POST / / r FFE=91 0 osT =m r RESTAURANT / ® OP. 6" SER':9`t Tc 11 Ii TC=91 /TC__ � -9 •1 S ..- C 6 0 •� =9 - -„ 3��e / - � H � / / / / bVn / •y =916 + i, f ® T TCTC-\ L-PROP. 3" SERVICF� V / T CENTER B J RE AIL CE •�o C10 cn � w / / ° ~ u 00 FFE=917.0 •T o o" C1 c �y a TC= 15=50 TC 91, / Q / / �'' � �t �° O n• 9t S�. 0 LEGEND TC=916.80 TOP CURB ELEVATION / / / yh TOP WALL=914. / / 0 \ �/ BOT WALL=912.0 \ —� 9. 7 0 C i 975 9• H �_ / , / / / \ O '*o� c 5 z / � IOUOR STORE / I 0 r /FFE=916.5 / , \ TOP WALL=9'._-.0 £ fir\ e • Q BOT WALL=91,2.0 s• RETAINING W'AL \\ 0 \ TOP WALL=916.0 c / . \ BOT WALL=912.0 \ � 3 � p / /�� E / E S y E ` °' - 3a�, o as¢ • / / z \ ` I 1 ` �° 10. /� �o `�° V ,° a O I 903. 0% • � �Q I / \ TOP WALL=91 BOT (ALL=91 0 91 1• ' / n '2, T/C= 911.71 /, z 4 C y :20 909.14 = 9 09.14 // a .� 1 71 / LoSI `�; T/C= 912.22 I o I \ / �• /\ / �+'62 INV.= 9 01.06 / '- w 0 30 60 24 o13B4 �22 16 FSTON N CONSTRUCTION s I T EHOU SE REDEVELOPMENT GRADING PLAN SHEET L__OF 'SHEETS I •.•HH• / S5 PROP. 6" RACE ti ° _ 3 DPOS7 PR 10" WM oST $ � o PROP. $" PVC AtJ SWR — S NT 'f •t — O �• d 6 �� N EX. 8" PVC S t SWR EX. 6" SWR SERVICE OP. 8" SERVICE PROP. E" PVC SAN SWR i tiny :: PROP. WM �g 0 /� ,' ::i: - � O C TE ?zp o 00 U v J n r �h J o Q ly- O z �- \C F '* 0 I E O � s " 000 U 3. \ h E=916.5 y RE T A:NING WALL De \� c\'S / dv It u- 3 0 . E E E bf .vi^' SE2 5 ti S6 " v�02 e/ � z /Vn • , z 1081 3 N ^ ®914E ALVE �o v a _ /� • E n C N no . ry o ANCHOR o O FD 97 / 7 � o e^' Q / M 2 W AD48 e ,CB D-257 , l 'u 0 1.71 ¢ oSI 39. 5.52 910RB_ 0 30 60 CB tp I 1039 p CBol- n0 1%2.47 H91 2.22 AMCON CONSTRUCTION 91&84' STONEHOUSE REDEVELOPMENT UTILITY PLAN SHEET Z_OF 2_—SHEETS r t h \. Ng �XI ppppp1 c. �ODB =D o f. 0 n 2 p� >Z z �gnln:_ 4 _ 3 00 X / sz co T .J 2 - D r " a n h's s c pRp-6 �"wg i kC r p i o s P s°� \ N e $ $ a' a° Rgz u3 - _ mg o 7 uy « Z ! 0 . 3 3 . F COUNTY ROAD 88 a s 3g3g3 2. ` eg `, T ir $a R k 6 1 J'P R a'P P gyg -9P N f F N R' € g I g. 4 9 �d�. 6' i S, e Z Af mvlu -c� In ?Imp st mst b v'na R-at r a Is 1 r u �'� i! g 'o ° ° r- 3 0 Omc Dm >w �'c m z s ZD� R as a 8g -Xy § a g ° � 8 ° c 2 gF� g8 A. ® go g 3 8 B �5 3 I a_ d e ° " z oc D 6 n n F8 B�3 ¢ �8 s §; °a Y 3 a k °. , F mo 36 ^B @ 3 R 3 �y 'D^ Zvi oop mlmil. m v3 y >zy § og B oB D g g 3 vm x xm p -u 0°D o o S $ pg �4� $ o� d D s ° ag ° aa gg C in" B d PM. qR R 8 SS� 3 $ L fTl z - — 1.L •--� 4 �q = 9 's°� s ig R � � s �, ao ��r, • ° $ , c � ^$ ° Erw x � B 4= � �� 8�� 8 � 8 • SPECIFIED CL. TRUNK HT. OVERALL HT. s as PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTI 'Rid 1111111111 � � Aft ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RETAIL CENTER a a:s1 ST ANTHONY VILLAGE,MINNESOTA r 5 rr ,. ,I.�CiLrl:caY.tl.( 1 11 - K�A.6N4�7, _ xnd�,�;d y N'd 44'-7 I'-Y �•� 1Yd I7-1' y.;. ,•t�5S I -,x I 4 AL AL I I e _ O e"-Ir I VI�� le•_p I T �J I o�� m b y 4 I 0 �` — -------------- -- --------------- I En ">1` I [rDii g � 4 � � •i�r En n.-e, I 'S 1S- N U N PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, m � t ,� �� � ��"Est I i 1111 111 i ���g ��, •. 'om A I �,��➢� ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RETAIL CENTER �;�: " o v"i, 8T.ANTHONY VILLAGE.MINNEBOTA 'I WAY SKdNAGE CRII=RUM ELEVATION KEYNOTES SIGNACE AREA ALLOCATIONS (15%of the main Euld;,q facade er 150 e.f.eh.chaver is Imx) FP=Eft 0 WALL UMMIED UWr iuN111 Retal Bulling 230' x 20' - 49DO s.f. x 15% - 990 mt. Restaurant Building 100' x 20' - 2000 mt. x 15% -300 mt. © ���xmaAnoN E9Br�� � �� Design OD Pfl6eBm MAIMAM 6lOWTIOR C dare womw Br9RL e/Qzw r---- emAAAn o outer mo!R¢U PROPOSED BUILDING SICNACE �---- WALL MOUNTED SICNAGE ffTY TENAMTI flun~''16-2. 'wT INDIVIDUAL BACKUi LETTERS -RACEWAY O Awhw Pixxe ffi-970-1211 Retail Building signage allocations MOUNTED.COORDINATE RACEWAY COLOR F MIUVam 14TAL Corm¢ Liquor Store =B3 I.f. x 2 = 199 mt. WITH MATERIAL TO BE MOUNTED ON. Typical tenants (7) = 20 Lf. x 2 = 40 s.f. per tenant max. = a MAXIMUM LETTER HECHT a 24* ©INDIVIDUAL NQum wrAL 000a a REVTOfG MAXIMUM INDDUAL SIGN LENGTH 20' _ Restaurant Buldmg - 3 Sign frontages • 100 s.f. max. per area (300 s.f. total) O awa 0001 0 O WWII YOWLED 901VA 0 e 0� 8 0 A a a A C C 17 IIQYn SIaRE MULTI-TOViNT MNL 1 SIGNAGE Y ir w NORTH ELEVAT".' _ ^ t/9'=1 a z U W W SIGNAGE SIGNA E Q J � W Z � psi X NORTH ELEVATION 1 e =T-o X NORTH a-EVATION 1 9 =1 a O g 5 O W Q O MMn-TEMANT MAX- UQ"STOW CERTIFICATION vemn xa e.w�A r_ xs Aenx i ♦ � � � � EXTERIOR B/1177/03 w1 NORTH ELEVATION_ P2 :,. — -- PGIE > -lai 10 1 E 11004.69(SW) 'r 18" 11 18-• r______ ' IE 991.67(NO 1 l O E RT E L 1 T IN i \ i ARCHITECTS TOP, I - PROTECT i � � _ in //''�� I1r/ 1795 9uwi Cww wvaue _______ -____—_—___� IBSt16B6-9,00 G a mP IOII. 11 Jar !M 3( OA.) -�; _i-__- --------- X •w...o�ro.wwu.nrL,n.ev.. IOW- p -- , 9x91(Sth i'I j I i 1 Y i nmacr Irl� ANTHONY 9LIA•R uUa Ram 1 D — RCP , ; , _ FIRE STATION TOP PAVEWIT 91 O I ❑ 1 I' M7W _ _ . ELEV.310H.7•J ' ,; I7a4f. Ir i I /, " DROP ----- I II n \ I O nv 188288 1 R ° ' REV&JHG P ill 1 11 noul..s 1 I I 11 II LEG= ' <1 , ✓ BEIlLI I -' PARl01C__ lDI_y ! L{ + I -__ " D104I0C:GTE VALVE Nw LINE,I - ,14 I W6�1IGM, 1 f1`I Ci O0.9m10 HYDRANT EDSUND CLM BOY DOMM WA1F761401 MAHIME ' y ' -�- ® BERM SAWMW MANHOLE 11 * I IS-* os9O sni6 MM•r• e 01157910 G701 BASIN E OMI NG POER POLE EROSO6 wATER Am SMER OAST II I E794(OIG 9G1E701A61 71EE --�I i I I CB :_�= =o====_: E MUDIC QD19 AND MITTEN . 1 U111 p' , I RE-991.37 GAS EASmOi GAS Wa 11 - ;-977. IMIER Q TEL OWING wm O 7BlPIIOIE LIME �� um AREA"�o __ L — .,L ' _— P-UG F]OSIBA WIDE 010m POIENA TOP PA1iE1891T I n Ir GAVE I / ` P-aI E30310D DIIEIaNEAD 1OEIt ELEV.3101125 I n vALOE ��I \ •—s DMINC FENCE n , �, DOM STREET SIGN PROPOSED TEE O PROPOSED GATE VALVE I u ✓ .� 11 a� 1 ♦ PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED.,Mw,l.r(sTGN1«sA1arART) PROPOSED CATOI BASH PROPOSED WA,FINA01 tars 4 $ , N `,r \1 TRA A �---J / I �� PROPOSED=1141111 MI R Y� PROPOSED Cum AND GUTTER II __ co �-p/...�-�� F70310D TIRE um '. -�-_. -- E705ING IIEE AID 99618 EROSION CONTROL Et71LE ~mot ,90100002 oars NTTm6,RUMON aarWZOOs 11 n _�I- i� ' �2 naEr PRO,BC,wE' oaI er RJG R I w ) \ a H wry Bss.75 N D N L[aLL— I o®®or J, . I a� 1 '�7 1' RE- - ' IE OD ®FOCILPI XR RWR m 100 UNDER TH "II Sfa,f TAR V 9[ — o Io m a 9[JYE a FOU ou[ I ^~• i i` i ! ` I 1 - I FOR OM OL.r OM 51TIE6RAMG. A 8F I I 1 ( I 1 NOf 101 fO61M1O1 Ot PWIf RIR� srORM$EWER AND EROSION CONTROL I ; )I !i I, I ; 1 'i UIOF01116%KAWM 0 ND EOWWROO O"�4 AL 00MLTAIn9 ' I I j l I I I I , o DPII .v1 fL HORN.PX 9fEr IR o�Lr 04 2003 C 1 O E RTEL ARCHITECTS 1 •\•. ._ / 1\,_-1 / . -' \11 } 9T.,PAUBAM CLAIIR 99109 ^\ / `• `` ``� I � 'G91I E9b-919E Tee 6911696.9109 GAa ST. ANTHONY Rm FAl `' ` '�' -FIRE & PUBLIC STALLS WORKS BALCO m - St.Anthony,MN PRecnca Z / r f� `- ( BFY CIVIL ro) �.� � /___�/ '.�f Jam• 1 �� ����I TRANSFOR 1FR 03-13 ° Q d 0 7.8.03 QO 11\ ' -I ,� `" ANC, BAs �O =3Da_ .f RESIpFNT'Al SITE PLAN I HE CERTIFY THAT THIS ST UMENT WAS PREPARED ME OR MY SUPERMSIONN D THAT DIRECT II AM IN C O ARCHITECT THE STATE EOFMIINNESOTA % d `N,� l 1 SITE PLAN PLANT MATERIALS SCAEDULE ❑E RTE L KEY COMMON NAME 07'f. ROOT SRE REMARKS ARCHITECTS 610AAT9 TO ROF 11 1RU TREES - TREM �"+�•/� l ! ,® WANeSE 5?Z4 7 BB 1-V 0. .4 LMBS 1')95 SAINT CLAIR A—UK �0 LY T BT.PpuL MINNe a[ITp 99109 696 5186 TSL AM AMR 01BW Se ACER NF A 16511 696-51138 F- .ICNMMl.11 , I BEM.1 RA7YPIIRlA ._,_.-,� AB AU a BIAZE 4 BB .............. --�--. ---- v,.rw.oa.Ta..aeNlae'e.mN ........................................................ ::::.::::::.�::'::::.........::':::'::: :':::::::::::'::: .......... .. .... ........ .-...:...........................:•:::::.......:::::::::.�:::. ACSC K FlIEDUNII'JaFFa6REV .....: ................ .....:.... _............... .............. B 9 B as SPRUCE . m .' ON S I' ST. ANTHONY ».....�.�--•-..•-- .(FDA)BIAEK NAL9 SY I 'RRUAI..YENS 4 GOMr. -0 I aFS:DSdr PARKING '..::. :.:A':..:.'.':.'.:'.:',..•.'. TAXIS Y MEDIA'TA1Hraf I 39NGIE 6TAUS ....... PEWCALS FIRE 8L PUBLIC oR+ avurw w wxr. n A(FOUR)6PMD:NG TSXS P.�' ', WORKS .- .'..:I c0a caKwa¢9oa caw_an '.... P.FauaalME DDR -6EE VIE vux ::'::I ORIUPLWAL� . �::'::":'::. M.UFRULEA 55P.ARWgNADFA ,, T VERIFY 11KATIPI O:pUBTMG TRFFS AV6 AfapJ9,VARiF4TED FAEETTIAG Al COff. q ..•.I•• ::::::•.:::::.:.::::::• AIO fiNRUBS TO RO4UX A.fFMC1A7J9 VARiFLOTV9 St.Anthony,MN / _ .._. a VERIFY ...... LOCATION erlsrwG TREES ;'/.�,� TO RETWN f 600 :.1..T }.. r .v :I :i;:'::' ......:`:::: LEGEND i ............... .'.4 .�•r:'i I 1 .� -SOD if i..................... J' '.F)i:ii'?:ii•i:'iiii::i•r:i a — : � �.� -NEW TREE r >. FIVE(S)RE TaGGD 0Dao ��� ? ..':' ' ,yx�a •,� � �l W ::::•:a'rri:'r};i`rr. . ,IRT -PLANT KEY -PLANT aANTrrY rr:c:i'r:'rr,rir:ii'c:•; .:.':.� -EXISTING SNRU85 i1rcr - _ :yrrcir. :'',:::jIL,':'::.'r::.'.::':':r:Pii:.vi::.':'•r:cir::'::'::'::':':::..,::r': - .AC ...: : .... . i rr:r::: :::. :. ?r....: : -EXISTING TREES . ?r .............. BAPX IMLR 4XO FDG1X4 :::I;;::;• ����A{{ ::•l.'r'_�fir:. ....... ........... '� ; : :!r}:WA4*MAS[nwt R.cwu 03-13 Cox STING WOODED AREA J I � 6EG SITE PUN 7.3.03 ............. .............. _ ............. t`� I...... ;-j:. ANC, SAO 1 1WINESE 81RW JL.O Ctrs q (SEE samxu) c=an RESIDENT PARKING UPANESE B!RG 'I I - SITY PLAN I BTAL18 1 i ..:::::::::::: :::':. ":1:'r:'rl::^:'l:'l:Yfll:1'.':Yl:'/.:'l:'r:::: BARK MSILrI AND ,L g/•::Ka.m.. :. � :':'::': .. I I HERB Y CER TI FY THAT THIS : OCUMENT WAS PREPARE D .'::'}:.:':.' :': ':.':.':.'.::::':.:'.':.:'. �^ EST ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I P I N AN THAT I CT AM SU EFM50 D I A Y R ARCHITECT DULY REGISTERED 4 ti A t: IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA v IGCAT NM R DOBT N.TREES 0 BT CF -�-- T1a1 To vay.W Inrn �._. vOaFr wares E%IS70G ISMS AND ...Jr. '-...................._.-. __._._.T• . .............. _ AxD wPEe6 TO RDIAT! .......-u`_T.,..�r.,..;.............................. -: AM -,..•..6(fT/E)A1'LIR fYPIE• VICD LEir i. _ ._' SCS OMIT ): LANDSCAPE PLAN LAND5GAPE PLAN H 11.Id.d a Lo. I .�� A / ❑ERTEL ARCHITECTS 9r.799 9-Cw 11 O'"\ MAIFA a.u�.ww..aom.sslo / qY�' II�TRATLIM AAA 1a7E MA"®r A ff 942-00 /ENC'offulamot1s; vlm.e la 1I6sr.o3s6a11as e 11 5 eso 99.6 e e--c5as1l�8es 6 T.t a .ct s u �t ST.ANTHONY PUBLIC WORKS ` WORKS ORAVEL DEPARTMENT _ f HSK°�+AOE g4y FLOOR rm ' T•00oRAVa ELEV. 9180 �I scDAnNo�nyMN e 944 GRACE _ 944.00 FOL,GR AOE q5o FLOOR ELEV. 945.0 MATCH / %1 1 �. CHANCIER DIM / FLOOR 947.00 946.00 PAVEMENT ELEV. / II- I 71P� w 008O1G GAIE VALVE ElEV 947.0 / I / 45,00 BIT d I70Sfa1c HYDRANT DOSID10 WATERMAM MANHOLE II 1 HID 0 E]65016 SAVORY MANHOLE /I g��5p 1 11 \ \ ® EXISTING SIM MANHOLE I II J \` b �� ! •; 917.1 o ® 0(6116 DOTER POLE `>L EMSED voER POLE II FLOOR o E CSIDIG SANWIY SEWER u 9 ; FLOOR ELEV 94&0 s ENSIM6 STUN SUER I f�p,EV 915,5 00 1) EXISTING WATERMAN ' 94� GIT =___________= E)MM dlli AND QR4R T�5o / oo+ IT CAS 0041616 GAS MAN—TEL— EOSCHG, 947.00 * P-LoG - ENST6IC IADFAQIOIBD POLAR 1nE TOP 35'Moo .VT 11 1 � 767 B1T T 0 , _ P-OR E7f6Q1G FENCE EAO POOR ® , " z I o , 94F.� —. E7(6'IOD HOME 1 II a /j r/6 - �� l� _ o0T o FROPOS STEEL 9Q1 i CONNECT TO E»rer V �I �,. � --` / �g1�7o ® PROPOSED GATE VALVE CATCH BASH , _—T Tlp®T. i l.7AIE 9�a5o b PRQIOSD MQtNrt E 81000 1 71 i tl 1 - SIM NI 1(W_DECIYt �� / 94&OOTOP�• PROPOSED,YMOIOE(51001 CA SAHOMIM trNtt 1 YX 1 99 61110 _ 916.70 TOP BR- 947.75 IN PROPOSED CATCH BASH E Blau(5q i 946.50 TOP TOP 9f. PROPOSED WAIERMAIN 1 1 am IF&Mae(�BMf1) _ / ICA n ��� mwosm S'NBGR1'S.MER 6K-tY 110' �iz• —01.6161 -- --- � �— wHOPngD sT0D1�eR _ y�y : ` . FROPOSD CM AND CUTTER .70 �O� `^'^'"„t..-..•...� 00S16D TWEE IDE 11 T!c 11 El". 948.5 1 it 1 OD : £�'k E]OgING TREE AND SIBBD TA 947.75 mm RD6T wame W1C1 , 11 �� 9qy. }p g1g 1fi0f00001 PAVEI�R ELEV. 1 jj le 0 C TOP Q 9947 SR l�n g�6,ty --————- ,IM OF��,1 ocE 6®E .N7 W 7DOl S 3933.8 lo'9T. RfM er. - Ric 3 e1 MH 1 I I I I r mp Al �16 o CV!®®IUMAIQIS Ocn®9e jBH FLOOR �G F 11 ��� 00pp ELEV. MOO w 22ftn I 11 11 HOP BR 1 11 3 TOP 11 I OP 9T 01 11 01 I, 11 10 1� 0 ORARI E PO 116381�T THAT M RMl J63yy'I, ma 94E POD 111.81iS0 11 973>rATAM OR 1370ff ME POD BOTTOM 931A0 Lam 6 9 �r AM w g F1mom umm VE 1 6 4E mww 0 0 10 'A A am a Sax PE SOME ■ FEET Adt OS 260.7 3 x718 w u6 ML 96]1111E- 0 FOR REVQM ONLY STTEGRADINO, 116 FOR�Cm51RGECI�DN�Q PGeMFT P13RO664 STORM SEWER AND C EROSION CONTROL cI�LI m1A�Y4Y¢ DMM]3M9.F AMM MD F71R03iMTAL Oa611LTM10 e pl,w .1011 B.ROM.Pm MEET ft 9 PE.r.. 707.16 tae Alt 01_2003 If O ERTEL ARCHITECTS �E%IST71f. 1799 SAINT CI.MR AY I- VFyETATION TO BT.PAUL.MINN[cOTA!9100 REMAIN —'T 1eb 11 e.6•5180 T6 r---' ----_ -- - ---'--' ---- elllb9e•l1B. FAx / �' Y www.Pewres.AwbNrrecTe.eoN c i Y I �,� POLICE IMPOUND ° „•-* ST. ANTHONY j/ NEW FENCE TEMP STORAGE/ I PUBLIC WORKS SONEYARD DEPARTMENT i i i 3801 Chandler Drive F / �r�yVS:j,.'i:'R4':Jri'�^ Y.may;r,:ti.,,'>'.r,• ::;s:���iii1`53;,;, ;\Itpii.''4c:;•'.�:1 i 1Sa::°''- �'�r-i'ii:"'`��:"ir.?::, ='iv. I $1.AntFl any, MN p •. :.!S"t Cy iU"' nl$:i'.>,;1; s',:A.� .ally= -d��F`.�C•.-\ -I..tM'.:+.`•R;rd`r':�:14,.4:' f^�•1. / '.r�=•P`j.,t)il r�'v441:'.•_r•,S t1r."^.Y^'��J,Y..;,S» ••�i. -...�^:li Ar. �r��,':e?j�S?ey •.1c-:::.R V':�,:'I)i`, ':? •4.:Aa;l/r>S�'�r:i..,,w F..R""yt.'g1:"•`J}:' 7 y("^-'�;L,.pq<,S..b M1Li�lrr,�i1.. .ti;.. .q.g;,a M^.�iN`,,, yh":° �'Li.':%.r,:.t:.I. .�4:• ; :•72,•(ti� Iti h•il,.:'l'y.;.•t �..^v �:;>••41 J\',,y,4,� ,".:uTY7'�'.f�: -At)�.'1 �:� :�'r��` ;.?.p•�. ��; - �f. r.;... Viz;. � '1 '�M1' y..SJ� ( ,w('.;;.5.4t_�>.,°L',r,\..J,e'i1�,�,:•.•,�y� e.4� �. t«:.r•y �;.:"lL• �. vary �'a,��• .:�,;.� .;�,^.• i"' �._ '2.'-tis'�•- c�.r�,t::,. A �I�• ',l^y.la Y b�:�ii�:+.rti i;.•'f."; J•r`.+ 't'•�,C :"T.fs-.• / •C�'�"•`�;��?:+..,%1';t?�r>•�,r� '>.:`5;�tix' Y��1�, y,•t; .L;1,..�:• Y�\ (`'!:!.`4:,t•+".r,��!tiY:.e.;s,Y'd._�w•:i.:'.y:: I .. '�, ,.I�� .:.�r�'r,,•�'K:�„?:,.: It> :i:�4.•,.��nl' '^��:: arsr:�� srn'ti=:--... T`:.t�•:,ur(' :-;:�<. =i i N:jf4,�,EjJ T:'F..i,{�2•<�Y.. d,. `?niC55>`,. n>�fY:y f�(7M�T'�q4- ire:4';%"•s.'e,. \`+.'c" :J 7. :r~ ;iN•:,,�\n:�i°.�, a.:F-:a�.;, +:•Tp�:y... :IL�Ai'P�'.��<tr,;T� ,',y�.�-..,.-...N.�1 I / 'v+.:�'j ,u:IV ':.`.n.d�=:t.:vs r _''.7.•�y�.:.• :'�•.;' .�-";', nt'.ilr•'.,"r1� 6• 'i:v>^;�P'r f+"�t:{:::lti ���r1i::. :�i /1 .n.:r}, ...Sn is; r•,•e,fir", b':'i :C' % •' \-?'Y^; '+;f)i •,v4. •:S. '++'a • n1'1'f--•r�•�.i ti.+,t t`.:-3,:it`�,,. >., .1?4' ..4� Z•.,i-,t,.�,...-FS'. i r',M`:v\�.oirA<':�'�:.�Ltr•ti"`.':;+:r..:r,�•M1,;," �i:1:1.�'y��"]•'.,�>,�;::'l.\t,':">!h.yc,�>iA�_+�,I.y �:V:!�h'•.,Jai ,�L •r N.',: / i.Wj/••.4;.0<r`��'' .'.y U`,t•�,_;.u. :;•r,4;lTiT a:,> •,%T•\t,.,t�.,A.'.'•f',, 1,_4.��.}..n/.'•y.�:r,•:.�; :iace1 -:J.. ,s.�.r4,,.t.-: I )...'t..k.ry .t!~,�. r �>.�r rG w «•• ���,.:a<�?''��:i„s u .�,` h.•yaj :;�a. �� .e ti•: >¢ a i ., r-\,� �e.4.r •,r +` •r a ,..i 4•;s„ t *;,Y...+ / a%S:�sa'.•'.:.,�'rs1y:.,• n.T�,: :n L. r.a rt^.. �:4•. � .,a.v,�?t�,•:e, ..:�;, ;+, $, ..>*. y:r_i:;.y:,,?�-?�_�i'-°:`h`•:'�:..tih�:s�,.. .y:.° ';L),5•. nr:r:°Yp;r{;%i•i,:\wa,. c'.:•;':irP'v^i• 8 i ?;1:k.:;+y:.F•�•� ;��, 't r•r;. .�:'f .o! c}l;>•: 'S�frw�:ti ' I .:M •.titi 'S t;:}Y:-r Ai•���:�i_1iR�?i,r.r�:J•.r,:i'.. •.,). �,r"y:`".:i'.'s„r:r. i +`y:t:v' a::a4�_± '•`i,•i•;a.;:,in.�:• ,-..�1'?J�L•� �if.?i 'r���r��5:• ir:�:•+.•'."S�'..H',:a?�yay.;C:\;�-:t:Y°�.j��:. .:d .•fi.,:a� _ n:f,- �., wr'"•:�titi>.r.,.f�>Hr;x ;,: wv ..•. +'r3 br vs�:,:r 'isv�';,);...?:, r�;:1a';.! .•.l. i 4u:):"k.>M '! n.. _Lr%:.x^ 1;4-Y;•;r�.. :A:r :A'" i,: X L qT 1� IM L�1„> 't •L:tT ..l'4 SJ�f r`l- g4 cI 't•ir:•' �:� H 1:•::K'N .1 ,A e`�rl •it,.?`tiL+`'(�t3• '�`^�j iru•.'Ir :ti..n' �'`r4.._,2T3 '$�'i`�n.r. •1�. N;M , Ld I :.l:�:4 .."{' y,1��4,>.•".�-{{Cti :'.t�;:�c:%. •.q, S ,� '�<j.M,�: • 1, �)�•'.f it v; ;a�L:±�\:. ,y-�, :y,J -t?c,���,.:. ,.s� JW«;.'.:, •t/ ' ' rk':H•*.°}li'. e:+srn:.a• �I �' J •{ :.}IF.,4 e'-:Y,. :::��.PrlJ�" '�,�.-• -t?;f �:�i�::,.,.Y: N,,,'., M-'.- I ��, ,,c r1, rir � ::t.,l... -r.'c' �1i,:is,v. •,.;fi�i'.,M;.a'!..;r'a•;;.q;1:a.C..:,, ,, �,t.� t::t�ti•��'�;"s•'�` :i > ;,,ale .•r+. :¢'; -j' •.Jy,.;. „u, �:` :�.,F, :"ti'.s -e. '.':e •?s'•-, ;�� Y r: .,1'• ,•.4 i::;° r',Ct•'f:y. :vr, •t.::� a;suri Y):t.'ua/i " r5 r•, .°.I.i .�!i� ,H..r ,..Jri::.',h.•, I ,3.`�'�f;%.. •s?.s;.`i'%y.•s.c• 1, r-�' i .-, y :I:+h\i,;'�- ,y..iv�' �,�;4"';r'.•r"`�'�•..s`� q,::YAN•• n•:1.�,:4y..-^•';i�7'��. r :Wti^�' -i'4: y.S'�akb 'i b':•,,::::,:� f'-�i"r`'v L..:J, 'Y � :v+r: l ^�`.:.�.� tir v:u';^'..Yi�� '.d,�"y..�,.;...,sy y _�,r,;t�.,;•:!.�L''-:._;+!�^.i>i.�n��/: �.:j sF:\I,' tiR!-`t-e�rd�•'��. •J>y:�,`�v...`✓•.`�..•. r^>� .��M�"1";• '•.iii .\+`;,�; :.r i, :.%1.J(„F ..A, �4ii-�":'!�'`�i ht� �`4.,..NFr�y'.,':,• r��'I I .t1t,;'?,.,`.1.'•>- '"�';L•r flf:: `:�iti='�y:.+:i+n i�F,,'`�`f•}:In• :'..y,4.4.t;:-NY• :.e�. p I �',;t4,sa::•Fa.�=t:,`'.'” .r4.,:1ii' k;'C. ...�>�:+; a,�` •"r'*';�" ` '�K1?�,k%�J:�:,�.•:,�C:_HL.;,,�l•i• )w,ev;`%r.:`�`E-�,�r._:t 4:•tti'?7 .�,�,.'Ft!vr:tt`':�,%:.:s'' .I i) ,i;ri>w,•+ :ya?s..r: ;•��G r< 'a-'..ti.0.f.�'y��.- �, G7v��.;i�:;.r •r�� _b 'i I ,}`4' ''{':j's'' IY:L 'J,av:\' V_:i {. �J.Frl.t-�'.k^•, :.y 3•:::> Yy.:I 1 '):',..• r:'^ e'S ti:y:`,. .1��1•a''c"n1r••;a'•:y�'w1,J \ 'I fr- e .;:'.r,.'=.{'i�:..•.n r.r�}e..:r':-�'��:`+:N w.... OV9YL� ••:i li r q/✓`"'''S.vv.\. }1Y v .:.�' r�c'S ak'ti^ih',-M7'`..4.:`.'Erg�i•:F,,e,,�,r•:m'•$a:'�\!a''>-•• I .i_..t'<::�..`S.•.. :.;�i.?_:fit::::?`3-n.i�a, t4� ..}i+'� .�.:`•• '!`?;�;7=r.,R,s..-�}:i:,• .-,.t! r_F Ex15nNC •i .:V:•dt�.: Jr4. a�:..:.. W I k_.ti:: +`;�L,x fin`�`il'c:•�i:r,,i'i.ltM>;' FENCE TO i VEHICLE STORAGE•16640 S.F. Txs'�". :.'�•, .,.` .1'ar �� //.�, REMAIN ^- i TEMPERED 9TORAGE/$1IOPS•6765 S.F. BITUMI I MAINT.•3m2 5.F. OFFlCE.299D S.F. Q Id-r u'•6• .,,i�/' � ra'-y rP•N '�• I RENOVATED COLD STORAGE.4633 S.F. 4 I 21 PARKING — b ME k -i I 94LT/9:WD STORAGE.3000 S.F. ( STALLS I • i I •� TEMP/SEASONAL I I PARKING STALLS I I wWO. 03-14 I • • j i Q Ta'd • • ''.:I ��auc 7.3.03 • • O RELOCATED • • i R TRS DL5 O --- GAS ISLAND • • 9ALT/SAND � JLO j C"NLINK FENCE III/ : STORAGE 'I•.'1 j ROLLING GATE W • • -:. I ________ I I RENOVATED i 'I EKISTNG COLD I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS RAGE STORM RETAINAGE II / i DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED j ill POND 1',/ i SUPERVISIONN DIRECT THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 5TC RAGE NEW SECTION y' liz BINS I OlAINU*FENCE j I i I ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. ._.- _._._._. ._._._,_. ._._._. ._._._. ._._.__._._._,------------ . '•C M'-7' IA'-c' Id-6' 16'-0 •'-0• -10' TIMBER 4TAJNIW.J ,•,,,, WALL-5'RIGW n` SITE PLAN SITE PLAN North ., A0.1 OERTEL ARCHITECTS pn5rING vEGErana ro RET741N BT.199 CLAIR A PAUL.MI Nn[9O TA 55105 696•91 Bb T6 16911 b9b-bf BE F- j www.o[wr[uno.rlT[vre.aar .c � I P0L1E1FP0"D ST. ANTHONY ..::..'. 4 . ... . NETN WAINUW i : .'::':':':::':::':':::':':':'::':: FENCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT � i 'i MATqIALS SCHEDULE .'... ..au••nC.•\--`ri'•^t,;^.�.�>,.,z�i•tri,�,�"rS::.:. n•!:>+'+:•,:t,�i,�Y."_Fr::;.G..'?,.`:: ".`a�YF,ir,�Y:�'a : a r.;.. . s aerua�lun o+n 3801 Chandler Drlve L .:. $t.Anthony,MN :.+;•v,•f. xil�:c:'t-..a,rt,. y.IR;a`��:•�.M; ':ta§�<;+,��.,_It�.< :V�'�i°n._ ;.•n;'•.•,:�y4?;�;5:2: �� .IwAllme' r'.::C' 1.41 .°,J...r.>.::4•:. \;:y::\t.;. .(�'r..1...�+t.e ...\..•; .,N.:xtt,;;:�y�,/, ,rsi°�:r-r.,^::hl,�.,,1'>r � n .l'��t:.. ..r<J,:. .,�;L�':.J'•: �-,j i:,�;:_ yr,Ftl-"' ;�1,�.' :!Ji-',....::/.'>ab'Y'- t lh�:'•"".?v.W :•.N. .,.?x':.a 1 I7 tLW aM r�\!1�:. :•Y•M1:iywr "�a.'�,1., ry ,.S.�ti�r',• �'.'.: 4,�:,�'R IS. }r•'r. 6 .y�::,`r:" +,� '.".:. =If.O } .,,{•;�;i:n•:•7 �c:• h.c_t,�. it,{ 1.8;.�.r:4-°>,fC=S;i�:l,^�lrit.r _..ya5l�:r�r4�4: .�fr iil.�l.."1�_�.:'i ...J)e :Yyr :,,4:fc"i'., ft. .,.V.ry,.d+.4•r>,;,'�`J.f..1,_ w.Y ••r•4l "'�fv.e t.,.y, 1u-� ?I� I i rij�°'�;;:5;re. •;� .1+r.rr�` �ww '�;�>,•;:,:�,;- r,:[ti.��t,�tv ��;? r tv'��_:n i'`.\ice'�-t';G a;y: �r;;: i _ d.'cs'• Ei•.-c>�=c.:.d+i'N' 4 .r.t�•l,,•.,1;:i -�n�. ,,•5'7 ,y�^�'r-c;!„>'i.4�;:�'%'`-: :. ,mod.. •1',5:x:; i m rxaDwmn . wrr. m 'ti'ti:r.:t;=„�..r��°.!,:Y 4�-yyAfr�."�;m•:•ty :.:u:! 'ci!Aart.` =..k.l....�(^;-,..:,:'i-FL•: ���".J:d•.r'v .K Y j fflPM nue9G1 / i•x :rt•:�S',"✓,•y�.._P-..:e{.4>.\'t. .s.,. •.=fit::;I aW�:• ,r4;.a.•};.-:=rv,� e�:, ;:.g1.4:�';,r��f.-• G o aum arxeo : mrr. m / Y'r i'1c`i'.t''7Y ::h:sl..f;�,}�..q': r:a'"l..yti�:e ��ti!q'.\..'.• :irb:'ii��l":r:v".Y7M,�:y:.7:%%, ."S�iirii�' :=11"A.. Wole eouvA ll4m' f,,'.•.�ti-•:.I.,..t.\��`r�a:,.::.;?'li ,:.(,tlt�ai��l:ur..`..4:r..... _ir4i'xir:ti':n1:1� u..0.;r1�, r1+.:_n_ti:i 4:.1v:'Y:'� �,h.", �:.�^i:�.; bM w[A011mt11000A 9 % ..1�:.a� :^c�., \ej�,r��i. :7T;?�,y?� a:>vh;. .rf.l-�..J.t* ::�$�ti•L.,�'::.v. �:.1:�r:�,f•:..L.�,kry:y.i['�.'. :.1.• �I u[ ;O„1 .�:�:e i.L;e•:�i✓•4;••....f�}`,i t'=`,y:o.< ,.A,. '"' i.W�.,i i•i?\�.rr:.r,.S��:i.::. >,ts' 3 '� i.�•tA-\, ,� i -r':itir•,rri<'•�i.•r =:i.1. v�,,r:,::>�;....ti:^��`8 .rr. >.i.; ,;r.�":�;.:<!;�M;�l:%�`_,�`;�;usa•.:{:�:� .rz:c:;a��F' 'i t.,..y.4- .*.•'. J!:ya,.,.C ..tfA- i4 "l°4�1 !'yvlj r✓!St. ..iii;_ i.Jjr.1�'1:,` ,,1C,r.'o.;'.it, •t.'•r�;:., / tv°'-�::]u'ti`/F..•`�N�,n 11�� u^�O'1>1•r Ya�k':It:•:.'�:.+.:,-;b�.G. siatj.-.•.S+i.�`.�q �y-e�1���;N'\.:i-�.b{w•:•_ati..i.'P:.f •C�•J leyW I 0 WNY41[!T! m fOR. O ' t' s"�'t:i iL:':f,��\.': r.•:Yw,: -ylic:..}�:�11v, •;Y,�S'1.r3r-r;l��.:�_ +..�.••1�11�:V, .'NYta:C.d:GsY^fw.:'�M`�'e>f.�1Y.ra`A.h' v / �54,`":�`,�:L:Jr•S[?,= .�4s\ >'`�.:�-�i.:r.l`M - ,i.Rq{��:1!..::l �rfra•. ,.Ae,�._}�= 7_1•.11'41', i 'irt:l .M raa4 M®r[L o 0R. • ..K 'tl •'...�.�4:')i n a.'rld4'<.. F _,., J ,�;:u F,'t::_ �2n"^a�S�c:A�.1 Yr... i •i i:`�'L'." �:.� :. tii'rv'-1i•'..'=.,;r,.r�.' ",kh�>• ,�M:+:n :i.'� a:-rr..:�r!,rT. i .t. :s>y..a, >t+.r ,t.'f:, ;•R• "r\`' ;y'v1i". ;r r 5..;;35;a:k: •,!;i',r ::f"t:iz >i `� t';:r: flITU w w,eDO[ufA 1e•sn �� r>I�,�^.:i:.,�:•�,!'^'f��j•=\'�i1 FIIN�15 R GiTYI[ M CPR, b / •r"iW..; r,>:= :•Fw• ;;.ti`k•'"4,v�w i'rT:• ;.ti\^•Y,=•r•.@,. :+4�'.it<•�'-',> �'�;�. .:)n.-,.r.„::'..!, .:f.. r'rry'r:a. ..n�.:.. �I j r. .r.i.>;,c „��;:`• .,,^•:`.;6.,•t'w,•'•„t�„� Y�. S:J.vS:���'r°�? rx�`•.:`+�:�r`c'i;,,�7 e..oaf.,�:.: �:_: e". o- ;t::s_a�.a, i 1210.111. r�.5• •.5.;:w:; 'a>�•`cr "ri•r�`:_•:e.;.acr.:�;.e r,\•i-y:,av>'. :; a ::ac•t:.,)•p:f.{-,7>.��aF.<�• , CURB Elm I 7ii.' ti:<�,�n ::".ti-n•�'.J./.rr..l., :.7.�.v:Nf`;�_Vi�'J..trrJ;.ti,'^ :i•� vrl,y ti;l'rl;...[.::.'C,r'i����.ly_v'•)•'4!`.v i:.J^.�-'.hY,a'='.> � e.brrW tl tart. o F :Yi -.`.S C?n .✓ Y! �.4q`�l.->' ':\'S'� a-.'^F:f'.n. yi'�'°�i.ti^.i':t�c �•!!1'-:'�°'>�j`i ,:\��':Y,•�"�y :i., �1'•.,jLd_�q.ti1 Ra1C l'NLG7 h W HuIt P[MeD.n[r m ¢[r. n ud<i•`✓.r vh�.':(:' .t}.•l.. �:�. ..'1 y.-I_:f"�.1.f>.:'" :_hcr�,. r.'•ir}r itn�:N!,>'' �'y3.>o ��O e::l.`tri'}e t Jo-.r�.�a,. BARK AND "� .r:•4A'.r,;Yt''i�tmiku..:.� Ti`r - :yC').s..;1.,� 6 :y:n: ..IYtiJ-��^'1'<-,,<?�,,.u.r'..,y. C ';fy!Y _'Ir�•%,t�.Y:h. .. '� %•�'.'4� •°i;,li', 1.5.,.:t.r�i'tii,,ti .:..,�,tti,'>�,;M1"�ri�7+i•'+� '.t:arL?,�,.:;r,-•�G?!•. ;.:ii'i tiK::..n�:U's•>.t?'-•:'; I tlo rrou w T m Dxr. a EDGR16 ,K���r`il?�.<JrY��.4:r• c4.-4.-v M:.{'i 'i,_ti;::!,Z:. e•.,.f-{.�A��;4;,,: .t;thn -.��Y.Ch�l':rN'"S:TM:k;'_v.s.,?,^b:.;Afh'FS...S�.'` I u.bunms aaae •N. ':+'�'rGi��rSP.y{��:f rS:.�Y 56�..y f.%•}�: e5:i>r'j:: �Y,y.;,v>�:,: � .t�i�.V;evt.-;;c�. .n., S.•.,.1.;..._�;,' 4'•. > :_..i.. y4�' .rti :);?i-� ..r�y�.:,.��:ti'r;:•.r.r.:ai �„r w+.''t.: +.w-'�:;":ce,�".i;.tt.. j s,w�•y;•> =;t•'`�,,°.,�v titi t-•eSi.�ti-1;`::..,a.=sr i ,.!r; :•wha4.;:.�,,,« ,.-;T�^s :lr�,_�,�,.lr r,<,Sr; y.,i7•w,r inr.''.�::��'r'�'r,.:y dcC.',�: ..ti•;..y'6='RH�' .F,1' 4:ti,...i51.;;•nx'i. •�t:r'n,:;.,v S. .F:"%:^:mow � •:v.:�.'.y ..;::`:' :x,!rtr:d.r"i;r-%w• :;nrLYi' :.tN.,;..rgs�._;?k--'",',.;'.>R.�>!1:'^.ti'�::Yv,p.:i Lg.L7ID �✓.1�°t7�M °y'.WfY�,,.�„r1A�, -rtt: .:y4,•.`,:"T:•:ati':t••.L.°.r.'. .'`trd•X.r:.tL•r'.°iC')Yh:�`°''�; �I +-)':L yip •'".i:t': °via a.a7•:hn...t..'n'"'1_':w.,.w•.a'�'� i'\>1•�'A'`.!s I Q Y,•:=,; fr >:1 ?yyi}.:r't-.,i?r:-1,n ` �C%t i!'':" .--,„.',N'•, ti'n;'� :,!a•kii�zi:-w r.•rs: .c,`c::,t.;: rv_:. .r,.9...'7et.r.y,,;v e,�titi:: y--I,.'�. ._,',�•.� - -,s4' -soe :;.�fir:7y5`�:y+`'�a:-'.:"`�ai';•:i:6,<. 4'�;vyN•±Y:'5�,,.j,?;.a..��.:;arl;=t•.iFr7.�;.a��v!•:�!• ;i�H;;:y,. � I a I h n•,.,is- r~ > `-'r'.1.t..,, -• � ?� � r. �'4`„ :`i` Y ?'aa,:^p�•\`i,�:''tJ,RCY:>:.9•„tq>y:G:' :!_ti:s•ta'r C•,:;�;�:_li"�„�:;i;^F>��G :' 'Y?:'Yr7 y .I ��,:. ai:,;k.v�::::�':.s..•-x.a. 3° ".'::7r3�:y ':','fir^ I M is,r. .a; ��n;�>"!�.:..>.,x.;.a .;.:L•,L `� .:5� ' ,I :.rr"�:.i11r. .;.: �u".it,%1` rw}'c.•• ..+.:.>'k. ..`yx I'r`4it;.: i��i��?; �,ti.;+?y,� i *l;t:;Ga`y-t�:=1�>F��3::Sy:l�;. ''�:e ry,;! t$,; :r[„i;: riSF;•.ti 'el i1 .r=;�5,`� i , i;;' t'r <r, J .n-.�:. :;.,- �'.4::,Y.*'''a:::r•'' Y to I � ,F..>Str: �'ey+'rY�a:'.•^.:...>;1' yr` ,;✓'':. ti7: .a.: r$.:>'rb�°1:: '.;li.. y.h L ly: 1., r- :iir7ti..,•1,�i�"12 411::5} �` ti,y-{n,.�,.t..r"`-r',i F'+fa:rl:?:.`L.: _ _.fr; EXISTING I -IQW TREL °i 3�:�*4'':i`. :�;.':.5: •;�"'• CHAMNAlNLItBC ; FENCE Q /� ! 1 -NON slaw .i -FLANr IRl• Q ,tt BARK FAJl4N j//.� �'�i i ® •7uxr t.11I1frITf .:.'I... .. ROCK MULCH :.'.'f.'.'. -.I 03-14 .':.j..:... • • lri 7.3.03 ROCK MULCH AND RELOCATED • • I m TRS DL.Ei j EDGING CAS ISLAND ae.+ • • SALT/SAND I rxt.m R. JLA j FENCE w/ROLLING STORAGE GATE I • • I I I I .... -.v..'::'. .... - .. . TRANSITION GEED .'.[.44,/x' \`\ 'r? MI i •%;. 4' RENOV TED j EGSTING COLD STORM RETAINAGE 'I!' QRpGE I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS I POND ,�� j DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED I BY NAND THAT Nit AM A DULY REOISTEREO ARCHITECT j IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TIMBER J1 15. ``:•, %%;' STORAGE SINS JI .......1. ..... v.::C:. ...:.c:c.?::..... vi-.i''Sii: :':.`::.':':.':::::.Y.::..;.....'..'.'.'...:.'.:.'.:.:'._.;.;.'.;._::::...'.'.'::'::'.:'.:...'.:;:.':::'::'':::'::': '.':.'.':':'.:'.:'.:':':'.'.':'::.'::':':::'.':.:'.'::'.', :.:•.........::..:...........::::.:•....::.:........:•.:.:...... ..:... ------- _._. TIMBER RETAINING WALL-E'NIGH LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN vlro" p_o1 Noah A0.1 MEMORANDUM DATE: 07/09/03 MEETING DATE: 07/15/03 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manag SUBJECT: Health Care Plus, Inc. Adult Day Care CUP Requested Action: Health Care Plus, Inc. is requesting a conditional use permit for an adult day care facility at 2500 Highway 88, #105, which is currently zoned commercial. Adult day care is now a conditional use in the commercial zoning district due to a recent amendment to the City's zoning code. July 15 is the public hearing for the Health Care Plus, Inc. conditional use permit. Background: Health Care Plus, Inc. has been interested in coming into St. Anthony for quite some time. In January 2002, Health Care Plus, Inc. petitioned the City to make an amendment to allow adult day care as the city code did not allow it as it does child day care. The City Council referred the issue to the Planning Commission. The Commission looked at the issue and determined it made the most sense to amend the City's commercial zoning district to allow adult day care as a conditional use which would allow the City to view each adult day care facility on a case-by-case basis and assign conditions as need be. With the amendment now in place, Health Care Plus, Inc. has applied for their conditional use permit. Randall Strand, an attorney who represents Health Care Plus, Inc., states in a letter to city staff that "a licensed adult day care facility would provide services for adults who are unable to care for themselves during the day, but do not need nursing home care. Most of the clients would be senior citizens needing care during working hours. The care provided would primarily consist of providing activities, lights snacks, and ensuring clients take their medications. These are the same activities found in day care facilities for children. The only difference is the age of the participants. As with children's daycare, there would be no overnight stays." The City Attorney's office reviewed the statutes and state rule regulating adult day care centers. The Minnesota Department of Human Services licenses such centers. The state rules establish a number of regulations governing adult day care centers to protect the safety and welfare of program participants. In addition, it is not necessary for the City to pass an ordinance regulating adult day care centers as state law sufficiently covers the area. Thus, in the proposed ordinance, adult day care centers are limited to those centers that are licensed under state laws and rules. Page 2 —Adult Day Care CUP Staff Recommendation: In the past, issues such as traffic circulation, hours of operation, and size of facility have been raised. Be prepared to make any recommended conditions, as necessary, that will be forwarded to the City Council for their July 22 meeting. Attachments: 0 Application for Conditional Use Permit ® Northgate Office Park Site Plan Date: June 09, 2003 Fee: $130.00 a CITY OF ST. ANTHONY APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Applicant: Health Care Plus, Inc Phone: 612-791-94,00 Address: Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.): Street address and/or legal description of property in question: 2500 Highway PR Zoning district in which property is located: C Conditional use proposed: Adu-lt Dav Care Facility Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied before a conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using additional sheets, if necessary. 1) The proposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning district in which it is to be located. Yes 2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of .persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values or improvements in the vicinity. It will not be detrimental nor injurious. Rather it will be a benefit to the city. 3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or com nity. Yes it iuill. Refer to atta&ed letter Signature of applicant: 0 10 -03 "kil41p4C� H' E'-,,.'AL---,TH CA RER PLUS, INC.. 2500 NEW BRIGHTON BLVD, (HWY 88) Suite 105 ST.ANTHONY, MN 55418 June 9, 2003 TO: City of St. Anthony; RE: Home Health Care Plus, Inc A conditional use Permit is being sought to achieve the requirements of the City of St. Anthony's municipal ordinance. That mandates a Conditional use permit for an adult day care use in a "C"zone. A floor plan of the planned new use is attached to this application to describe the intent or this project. The following is not included nor in our oppinion required other information that describes or portrays the site. (such as a survey, a site plan, stormwater detention, drainage, landscaping and paving) or that describes or portrays the complete building in which this project is located. You may contact us at (612) 781-9400, if you have any questions. Sincerely, David Olslfans , Admini rato 187.2' 50'0" 30-0-- 4'0" 125'0" U / O U / Parking �bt o z / / / / / 126-0" 363 77.0' SITE PLAN 6325 WELCOMEAVE.N. SALESMAN: COTA SCALE. NTS MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55429 FILE:. LOCATION: 9 o N s (163J535-0080 N-GATE2.CDR ST.ANTHONY, MN MEMORANDUM DATE: 07/09/03 MEETING DATE: 07/15/03 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Northgate Office Park Sign Plan Requested Action: Northgate Office Park has submitted both a comprehensive sign plan and sign variance request for their proposed pylon sign. When a Comprehensive Sign Plan is presented, exceptions to the regulations of the sign ordinance may be permitted if the sign plan as a whole is in conformity with the intent of the ordinance. The City Manager has rejected the proposed sign plan under the comprehensive sign plan because Northgate's sign plan has deviated too far from the City's sign ordinance. Instead, the proposed sign plan will be looked at as a package of variance requests, as follows: (a) An 8 foot height variance to allow for a 16 foot sign; (b) A 10 foot setback variance to allow for a 5 foot setback from the driveway; (c) A variance of 16 square feet to allow for a sign surface area of 96 square feet for two copy surfaces; and (d) A variance for a pylon sign. July 15 is the public hearing for the above stated sign variance requests from the Northgate Office Park. Background: Northgate Office Park has proposed a pylon sign for the front of their building at 2500 Highway 88, so their tenants can have visibility. The proposed sign deviates from the City's sign ordinance in several ways.. As the applicant pointed out in their variance application, the proposed sign is higher than what is allowed by city code. The maximum height of a ground sign (which is the standard the City will use) is 8 feet including the pedestal and any berming; the petitioners are proposing a 16-foot sign, thus the 8-foot variance request. The second variance the petitioners pointed out in their application is a variance for the setback from the driveway. The sign ordinance states sign must be located at least 15 feet from the driveway, in this case. The petitioners are proposing a setback of 5 feet from the driveway, thus the 10-foot setback variance request. The petitioner gives reasons why the above-mentioned variances are needed in their application letter (see attached). Upon staff's review of the proposed sign, there are additional variances that would be necessary to implement the sign permit for this application. In addition to the above, the proposed sign square footage is over the allowed square footage for a ground sign with two copy surfaces for buildings with two or more tenants. The maximum allowed is 80 Page 2— Northgate Office Park Sign Variances square feet and the petitioners propose a 96 square-foot sign, which is 16 square feet over the city maximum. The other item that is not in compliance with the sign ordinance is the fact that the petitioners propose a pylon sign. A pylon sign is not allowed in the City with the exception of in a commercial zoning district at gas stations. There are other items, which should be noted. The landscaping proposed for the sign is not adequate. The petitioners propose minimal landscaping which is not aesthetically pleasing. Ground signs must be landscaped. Landscaping may consist of shrubs, plants, rocks, or other decorative material located around the pedestal. The petitioners' show the proposed sign with a shrub, evergreen tree, and decorative rock distanced a part from the sign. Another ground sign code requirement is the pedestal width of a ground sign must be least equal to the sign width. Although that is the case on the proposed sign, it looks out of balance with the proposed height. Staff Recommendation: Xthough the petitioners at Northgate Office Park are in need of a sign, the City must adhere to its own standards. The proposed sign is too far out of line from the City's sign ordinance. It misses the mark on almost every city code criterion for a ground sign. A pylon sign is not allowed by the sign ordinance and that is for a reason; it is not acceptable by city standards. City staff recommends denial of the proposed sign application. Attachments: • Applications for Comprehensive Sign Plan and Sign Variance • Northgate Office Park Sign Plan Sign Permit Application For Northgate Office Park Condominium Owners Association June 16, 2003 i I� DATE: June 16, 2003 FEE: $50.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN Leroy Sign Company APPLICANT: Northgate Office Park PHONE: (612)789-1213 I ADDRESS: 2500 Highway 88, St. Anthony Status of applicant (owner, renter, agent, etc.):. Building Manager/Treasurer I 2500 Highway 88, St. Anthony Location of property where application is made: Zoning district in which property is located: Commercial P1,E,1SE INCLUDE DE:'.ULED FLAN(S)/DRAWING(S). BACKGROUND: A comprehensive sign plan must be provided for the whole of a shopping center or strip mall. This plan includes the location, size, height, color, lighting and orientation of all signs, and must be submitted for preliminary plan approval. When a comprehensive plan is presented, exceptions to the regulations of the Sign Ordinance may be permitted if the sign areas and densities.for the plan as a whole are in conformity with the intent of the Sign Ordinance and if such exception results in an improved relationship between the various parts of the plan as determined by the Council. Comprehensive Sign Plans will be reviewed by the City Planning Commission who will forward a recommendation to the Council on the appropriateness of the proposed plan. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: Date: June 16, 2003 Fee: $100.00 CITY OF ST. ANTHONYf� c Petition for Sign Variance Applicant: Northgate Condominium Owner's Association & Leroy Sign Company Address: 2500 Highway 88 #214 Phone: (612)789-1213 Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.): Treasurer/Building Manager Street address and/or legal description of property petitioned for variance: 2500 Highway 88, St. Anthony Zoning district in which property is located: Commercial Request: Variance on height limit to 14 or 16 feet and a variance in setback from driveway to approx 5 feet. Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions, using additional sheets, if necessary. 1. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or iniurious to other property in the neighborhood or village. 2. A particular hardship to the applicant would result if the strict letter of the regulations are adhered to. 3. The conditions upon which the applications for a variance are based are uhi ue to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable, generally, to other property within th s e us ssification. Le ro. S:S^J z J_^e- Signatu a of Applicant Date: Northgate Office Park 2500 New Brighton Blvd. St. Anthony MN 55418 June 16, 2003 To; City of St. Anthony Re: Sign Variance request Item 1. The proposed sign height(16 feet) is considerably lower that the.building or any building adjacent to it. It will not be visible from any direction except the East(Highway 88) or from any residential area. The proposed setback from our driveway (4 feet) will impact only our snowplowing contractors and will not interfere with any other person's normal functions. Item 2. Limiting the sign to eight feet will make it difficult for motorists approaching our building to locate it easily and may result in distracted driving as they attempt to see it. Extending the setback to fifteen feet would result in the same difficulty, as well as requiring the removal of a large fir tree. We also feel that raising the bottom of the sign proper to eight feet from the ground will heip prevent vandalism. Item 3. Given the unusual triangular configuration of our parking area, it would be difficult if not impossible to place a sign to meet the conditions of the ordinance without disrupting our parking and the orderly flow of traffic in and out. Comprehensive Sign Plan: No further signage is planned in the foreseeable future and the unsightly former driveup teller which currently occupies a portion of our lot(and which currently contains signage) will be removed as a part of this project. Lighting: Interior lighting by means of six vertical fluorescent high-output tubes mounted vertically on twelve inch centers. Lighting is anticipated to be from dusk to midnight. Landscaping: Will remain essentially unchanged except for the addition of small shrubs or bushes around the base of the sign support. Sincerely, E. J. (Jerry) Kellgren Building Manager 187.2' 50'0" 30'0" 4'0" 125'0" / O Parking �bt o / z / / / / / 1250" / Q7 363 77.0' SALESMAN: SCALE: 6325 WELCOMEAVE.N. JIM COTA NTS SITE PLAN MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55429 FILE: LOCATION: s i o N e (163(535-0080 N-GATE2,CDR ST.ANTHONY, MN a �a ca+ �y`� 'f `i T 2 4 lam. �''�^'s'` ti t �- "/a" "�a• r �-�,m-�4` � �. gy,, h F , , 4=tr'.,�E ".a:.,ss,..;£-3.. .�^..,+'rs. 'Sa i '`r"�Se �„ >ys k �x r. 4° 41.,mr s. MAIM � "S y." -�.'. : o t axi a s,. }is— 2' "' '.� 3. �. 4-r'-y` 4S.c ��i¢'4 3_r•�7 n a ems" : 1 �. •e¢,F " pa OEM • .l" N $ �'q..TcS.. -e o,� �,..by �,c-it'9` �.= -�,� ,�s, �3 ^ W Y 'o`�.ti,� -f ��'�'"T •c"�1tR `"-a^ v�v. �,,s; A`'v r� � �- ST M. RM t Gj•"Jam'+ '�.?CcsF. �2-. � �y. �-i•"� 3..s �.. ..ate ��� -G4 e'°4° ��.. ����3 ,���i�'.•°Ye�,[�4 N�'�°i ��,^F.4%`- 9 � � ' •�'rj �'� � x yp4i33J.� 9 �k�{rte mac' >,ae�\^�'F Y��T `�•�,Y l �4 gm EVERGREEN TREE PROPOSED SIGN SHRUB R DECRATIVE ROCK / / / Parldng Lot SITE PLAN 6325WELCOW AVE.N. 5��"JIM COTA SCALE: NTS MMEAPaA MN 55429 FILE: LOCATION: p63)s3s-0oeo N-GATE2.CDR ST.ANTHONY, MN - -4 x 5,, .� '€ rf x?q 1 i • x z l 3, 2 it A�5 rv't ol •� L � - v P g � fi { ti ,4 .,-3�,� hl T � r Northgate Office Park 0,11„ 8101. 0'11" 16'0" 810.1 � '�u .-::. ;r.�n'. _ r`rt• :,s:.t:r tT;`. _ t�h,W '..".., SALESMAN: SCALE: PROPOSED 16' TALL PYLON SIGN MINNEAPO WELCOME MN 55-12,5429 JIM COTA 1/2" = 1' (163)535-0080 FILE: LOCATION: N-GATE-1,CDR ST.ANTHONY, MN ' 9 ry Office r P 4. Y „_ ;� J �i ..�.-.i' 0 �,��,2oe ��TC��•L � ti.- ��a:a.,�4 i a � � :, 1 ,r• ` y} 'n.IC,:.a NF9 .•��� �" Fit,, ONE 8'x6' DOUBLE FACED CABINET MOUNTED P 6325 WELCOME AVE.N. S JIM COTA S NTS ON A 8'TALL ALUMINUM BASE MINNEAPOLS,MN 55429 FILE: LOCARON: (763J535-0DBD e 0 N-GATE-3.CDR ST, ANTHONY, MN City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 1 1 DRAFT 2 3 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 4 5 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 6 7 JUNE 24, 2003 8 9 CALL TO ORDER. 10 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 11 12 PLEDGE OF,�ALLEGLANCE. 13 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 14 15 ROLL CALL. 16 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust. 17 Absent: None. 18 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson and City Attorney Jerome Gilligan. 19 20 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 21 ITEMS. 22 23 I. APPROVAL OF JUNE 24, 2003, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 24 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to approve the City Council Meeting Agenda of'June 24, 25 2003. 26 27 Motion carried unanimously. 28 29 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS. 30 None. 31 32 III. COMMUNITY FORUM. 33 Mayor Hodson invited residents to come forward at this time to address the Council on items 34 that were not on the regular agenda. 35 36 Hearing none, Mayor Hodson moved forward with the agenda. 37 38 IV. CONSENT AGENDA. 39 40 A. Approve June 10, 2003, Council meeting minutes. 41 B. Consider licenses and permits. 42 C. Consider payment of claims. 43 D. Consider the third reading of the following ordinances: 44 1. Ordinance 2003-003, re: Pawnbrokers. 45 2. Ordinance 2003-004, re: Secondhand dealers. 46 3. Ordinance 2003-005, re: Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Dealers as conditional 47 uses in commercial districts. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 2 1 4. Ordinance 2003-006, re: Fees for investigation and licensing of Pawnbrokers and 2 Secondhand Dealers. 3 5. Ordinance 2003-007, re: Amend ordinance to allow adult day care centers as 4 conditional uses in C zoned districts. 5 6 Councilmember Sparks requested the removal of Consent Agenda Item A. 7 8 Councilmember Sparks requested that page 4, lines 21-23, read as follows: Councilmember 9 Sparks stated that the City should establish a grant process to assist residents who cannot afford 10 a lump sum payment. 11 12 Councilmember Faust requested that on page 7, line 40, it should read "DSU"instead of`BSU." 13 14 Motion by Councilmember Faust to approve the Consent Agenda items. 15 16 Ayes—4, Nays— 0, Abstention — 1 (Horst). Motion carried. 17 18 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 19 None. 20 21 VI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF. 22 A. Planning Commission—June 17, 2003. 23 1. Resolution 03-046, re: Side yard variance request for 2813 —36`h Avenue NE. 24 25 Dave Stepan, property owner of the single-family residential lot at 2813 —36`h Avenue NE, 26 requested a side yard variance of 13 feet for a proposed distance of 32 feet from the curb for a 27 proposed addition. 28 29 Mr. Jim Hoska of the Planning Commission came forward and explained that Mr. Stepan was 30 building a 16' x 16' addition to his home. He stated that the ordinance currently in force would 31 not allow Mr. Stepan to build the addition without a variance being granted. Mr. Hoska added 32 that the Planning Commission had granted the requested variance, and he explained the reasons 33 for granting the variance. 34 35 Councilmember Faust noted that a similar variance had previously been granted in the same 36 vicinity. He stated that it had worked well, and no one looking at the property would know the 37 difference. Councilmember Faust stated he was in favor of granting the variance. 38 39 Councilmember Sparks asked questions about how the variance amount was calculated. 40 Discussion followed regarding the method for calculating the variance. 41 42 Motion by Councilmember Faust to adopt Resolution 03-046, approving a side yard variance 43 request for 2813 —36`h Avenue NE. 44 45 Motion carried unanimously. 46 47 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 3 1 A. Consider Resolution 03-045, re: Approval of a polling location change. 2 City Manager Mike Morrison explained that registered voters residing in Precinct 1,Hennepin 3 County of the City of St. Anthony, had voted at the St. Anthony Fire Station in previous 4 elections. Due to redevelopment of the area in which the Fire Station is located and its 5 subsequent relocation, a new location for said polling place needed to be established. After 6 consideration of available locations, it was determined that the most favorable polling location 7 was Doran Hall, located in the St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church, 2739 Stinson Boulevard. 8 Mr. Mornson added that the resolution needed approval, as the voters in Precinct 1 must be 9 notified of the change 60 days prior to an election. 10 11 Councilmember Thuesen asked if this was a long-term solution. Mr. Mornson responded that it 12 had the potential for being a long-term solution. 13 14 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to adopt Resolution 03-045, approving a polling location 15 change. 16 17 Motion carried unanimously. 18 19 B. Consider Resolution 03-043 re: Approve decertification of Kenzie Terrace Tax 20 Increment Financing District. 21 City Attorney Jerome Gilligan recommended the City of St. Anthony take action to decertify the 22 Kenzie Terrace Tax Increment Finance District for the following reasons: 23 24 1. The bonds issued to finance the redevelopment would be callable February 1, 25 2004, and the City had adequate cash to pay the outstanding debt. Therefore, all 26 debt associated with the City Hall/Community Center Building would be retired. 27 In addition,by calling the bonds, interest expense of$235,315 would be saved. 28 2. Under the current law, other than for the City Hall/Community Center Bonds, the 29 increment from the District could not be used for other purposes outside of the 30 TIF District boundaries. 31 3. Decertifying the District would place the property back on the City's tax roles. 32 This would provide a significant increase to the City's tax capacity, and the City's 33 expenses would be spread across a larger tax base. Therefore, the tax burden 34 would decrease, and the impact of future debt would not be as significant. 35 4. Decertification of Kenzie would reduce the tax impact of the costs associated with 36 the building of the new Public Works and Fire Station buildings. 37 38 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adopt Resolution 03-043, approving decertification of 39 Kenzie Terrace Tax Increment Financing District. 40 41 Discussion: 42 Mayor Hodson noted that the calling of the bonds would save the City approximately$235,000 43 in interest expense. He thanked the staff for taking care of the matter in such a wise fashion. 44 45 Motion carried unanimously. 46 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 4 1 C. Consider Ordinance 2003-008, re: CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco franchise renewal Cl! 2 reading). 3 Mr. Gilligan indicated that CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco had been working throughout the 4 metro area over the past 12 to 18 months renewing their franchise agreements with cities. The 5 existing franchise with St. Anthony would expire in the near future. The proposed ordinance had 6 been used in other cities and was derived from a model prepared by the League of Minnesota 7 Cities with certain modifications. The franchise ordinance gave CenterPoint Energy 8 Minnegasco a nonexclusive right to use public grounds to distribute gas to customers within the 9 City. 10 11 Mr. Gilligan added that the franchise ordinance did not impose a franchise fee; however, it did 12 give the City Council the ability to impose said fee in the future should it choose to do so. He 13 added that, if the City chose to impose the franchise fee, like fees would need to be charged to 14 any other energy providers in the City to make the "playing field" level. 15 16 Motion by Councilmember Faust to approve First Reading of Ordinance 2003-008 re: 17 CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco franchise renewal. 18 19 Discussion: 20 Mayor Hodson asked if most Cities put together a franchise fee and, if so, by what process was 21 the fee determined. 22 23 Connie Hargest, Senior Specialist in Local Government Relations at CenterPoint Energy, came 24 forward to address the Council. She stated that many of the cities in the first-ring suburbs were 25 looking at franchise fees. She added that the franchise fees were an option for cities under State 26 statute. Ms. Hargest stated that she would appreciate if the City would work with CenterPoint 27 Energy if they decided to pursue a franchise fee, as CenterPoint Energy had experience in this 28 area. 29 30 Councilmember Faust commented that he did not know that the City was planning to implement 31 the franchise fee. At this point, the goal was to clean up some of the ordinances. 32 33 Councilmember Horst suggested discussing this issue at a future work session. 34 35 Ms. Hargest noted that the franchise agreement was a 20-year working agreement that allowed 36 CenterPoint Energy to operate within the City. 37 38 Motion carried unanimously. 39 40 D. Consider Resolution 03-044, re: Approve application for a grant through Livable 41 Communities. 42 City Manager Mornson indicated that the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities 43 Demonstration Account was designed to fund a variety of community development projects 44 through loans or grants that linked development and redevelopment with transit, linked 45 affordable housing with employment growth areas, intensified land use that led to more compact 46 development/redevelopment, encouraged public infrastructure that connected urban and City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 5 1 suburban communities, attracted sector investment or provided employment opportunities for 2 residents. 3 4 Mr. Momson added that, for the 2003 funding round, staff wished to submit an application for an 5 $850,000 implementation grant that would be utilized for development of a central park with 6 lighting, kiosks, benches, etc., as well as improvements to the storm water and infiltration ponds. 7 If awarded funds, the City would be able to assure that the public park would be developed as 8 originally envisioned by the City Council and Task Force. In addition, the existing water quality 9 issues could be adequately addressed. 10 11 It was noted that application would be submitted to The Metropolitan Council on June 30, 2003, 12 and funds would be awarded in November. 13 14 Mr. Mornson stated that the City had applied for a grant last year, and the grant had been denied. 15 He said that this year representatives from the City had met with Metropolitan Council staff 16 several times and, as a result, were asking for the grant of$850,000 to help put a park system 17 into Apache Plaza. Mr. Morrison added that he had just been advised that the City had been 18 awarded an environmental grant in the amount of$585,000 that would be designated for 19 asbestos abatement at Apache Plaza. The Council applauded Ms. Kvilvang's efforts in applying 20 for and receiving the environmental grant on behalf of the City. 21 22 Motion by Councilmember Faust to adopt Resolution 03-044, authorizing application for a 23 development grant through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program. 24 25 Motion carried unanimously. 26 27 E. Consider Resolution 03-047 re Approve redevelopment option for Stonehouse/SAV 1 28 and Fire Station site. 29 Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers and Associates, came forward to address the Council. She noted that on 30 December 12, 2002, Amcon Construction submitted a proposal to the City to redevelop the 31 Stonehouse/SAV 1 and Fire Station site. Amcon submitted four redevelopment options for the 32 Redevelopment Site to the City for review and consideration. After review of the options, it was 33 recommended that the City Council approve the development option that consisted of the City 34 retaining ownership of a portion of the land, owning its own Municipal Liquor Store and selling 35 the remaining land to the Developer for development of a restaurant pad and additional retail 36 space. Ms. Kvilvang explained how this option brought the most revenue into the City's general 37 fund. She also listed the future steps that would be required to complete the project. She added 38 that on July 22, 2003, the Council would decide how the financing would be accomplished. 39 40 Councilmember Faust asked if the final numbers would be available in the final Development 41 Agreement. Ms. Kvilvang responded that they would. Councilmember Faust asked who would 42 "eat the cost" if unexpected expenses were uncovered. Ms. Kvilvang stated that the numbers in 43 the final Development Agreement would include any unexpected expenses, as those numbers 44 would be known by that time. 45 46 Councilmember Thuesen asked City Manager Morrison if he was comfortable with the potential 47 options available in a situation where the land sale receipts were not adequate to finance the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 6 1 liquor store. Mr. Mornson responded that option#1, financing the remaining balance from 2 internal City funds; would probably be recommended. .Councilmpmber Thuesen stated that it 3 appeared a large portion would be financed through the sale. 4 5 Councilmember Horst•.asked if Amcon agreed with the option the City has chosen. Ms. 6 Kvilvang stated that they did. 7 8 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to adopt Resolution 03-047, approving redevelopment 9 option for the Stonehouse/SAV 1 and Fire Station site. 10 11 Motion carried unanimously. 12 13 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS. 14 City Manager Morrison discussed the"Future Council Agenda Items" distributed to the Council. 15 He noted the following items: 16 ■ Six requests for planning review at the Council meeting on July 22, 2003. 17 ■ Work session.with,the School Board.on July-29, 2003, which would be held at the new 18 Central Park Pavilion. 19 ■ Tax increment public hearing for Apache Plaza was deferred until August 26, 2003. 20 ■ Bid packages for the public works/fire facilities would be considered at the August 26, 2003, 21 meeting. 22 ■ Closed on Christian property; however, the residents of the homes have a lease with the City 23 until July 30, 2003. One of the City's obligations is to abate asbestos in the two homes, 24 which would be done the first week of August 2003. Bid packages were due August 12. 25 ■ Public hearing for conditional use permit and variances for the fire station and setback 26 variances for the public works building would be held on July 15, 2003. 27 ■ Construction Committee picked a groundbreaking date, for both buildings, of September 9, 28 2003, at 5:00 p.m. Refreshments would be served after the groundbreaking. 29 ■ Stonehouse auction was held on June 19, 2003. The early numbers showed that the City 30 netted $27,000. 31 ■ Meetings being held with County Board regarding easement issue, which is tentatively 32 scheduled for County Board approval at an August 8, 2003, meeting. 33 34 Mr. Morrison stated that Mayor Hodson had sent a letter to the utility company regarding an extra 35 %z% sales tax. He noted that CenterPoint Energy had responded immediately. 36 37 Councilmember Horst had no report. 38 39 Councilmember Sparks asked Mr. Morrison what was happening with the trees in the park. She 40 stated that they should have been in by the beginning of June. She also asked how the grass 41 looked. Mr. Morrison responded that there had not been any changes since the meeting with the 42 Park Commission. He stated that everything was on schedule. 43 44 Councilmember Thuesen asked Mr. Morrison about the grass at Central Park. He wondered if it 45 was the contractor who was putting in the grass and maintaining it. He stated that he had talked 46 with a resident who felt the grass should be establishing better and quicker. He asked if the 47 Council should explore obtaining the services of an "expert." City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 7 1 Councilmember Sparks responded that the City's consultant was supposedly an expert. She 2 stated there had been problems with the soil because it was sandy. The sandy soil was causing 3 the grass to take hold at a slower pace. She added that the sandy soil was chosen because of 4 drainage issues. Councilmember Sparks noted that the people who designed the park were not 5 taking care of growing the grass, as another entity was responsible for the turf management. 6 7 Councilmember Faust indicated that on June 13, 2003, Mayor Hodson, Mr. Momson and he had 8 met at Ehlers to finalize the report on the Blue Ribbon Panel to bring to the Council. He also 9 stated that he had attended the League of Minnesota Cities' meeting June 18 to 20, 2003. He 10 listed some of the speakers at the meeting and felt there had been a very good interchange about 11 how cities were working. He noted there had been editorials in the morning papers that stemmed 12 from that interchange. 13 14 Councilmember Faust stated that, later in the meeting, the mayor of Washington D.C. had been 15 the speaker. He felt the mayor's presentation was very enlightening and positive. He indicated 16 that a synopsis of proposed laws and laws that had passed this year,,as they pertained to cities, 17 would be received in the mail. He encouraged those who could to attend the League conference, 18 as St. Anthony could emulate some of the things other cities were doing. 19 20 Councilmember Sparks noted that the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization would 21 be having a public hearing in St. Anthony on July 17, 2003. They would be presenting the 22 capital improvement projects slated for the upcoming budget year. She also indicated that the 23 Village Fest, planned for August 2, 2003, at the Salvation Army camp, was moving forward. 24 25 Councilmember Faust indicated that the League of Minnesota Cities would be changing their 26 annual conference from June to October, which hopefully would allow more opportunity for 27 attendance. 28 29 Mayor Hodson noted that he had received a call from one of the City's state representatives. She 30 suggested that she could give an update on what was happening at the Capitol. Councilmember 31 Faust asked if a meeting should be planned. Mayor Hodson asked Mr. Morrison if he thought 32 the meeting could be scheduled. Mr. Morrison responded that he would try to schedule a 33 meeting sometime in August. He thought that would be a good time, as the City would know the 34 impact of the budget changes by that time. He added that it would also allow the City to keep a 35 pulse on such issues as wine in grocery stores, elimination of enterprise funds, etc. 36 37 Mr. Morrison noted that on Monday, June 23, 2003, a letter had been sent to Congressman Sabo 38 from Mayor Hodson inviting him to the Chamber golf tournament. Mr. Morrison stated that 39 Congressman Sabo had called personally and indicated that he would like to attend. 40 41 City Attorney Gilligan noted that the legislature had scheduled the bar closing time at 2:00 a.m. 42 He added that, if the City did not take any action, restaurants could remain open until 2:00 a.m. 43 It was the Council's responsibility to act if they wanted to keep the closing time at 1:00 a.m. 44 45 Councilmember Sparks indicated she would like to keep the closing time at 1:00 a.m. 46 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 24, 2003 Page 8 1 City Manager Mornson stated that the City was in a unique position because it did not have any 2 restaurants. He noted that the tone could be set now, and any restaurants that came into the City 3 would know the rules. 4 5 Councilmember Sparks asked if this should be handled before the liquor licenses were issued. 6 Mr. Gilligan responded that he would recommend acting before the liquor licenses were issued. 7 Mr. Mornson noted that, according to Amcon, the restaurant would be applying for its liquor 8 license in August. 9 10 Councilmember Faust stated that, if the City were preemptive and proactive and kept the closing 11 time at 1:00 a.m., the ordinance could always be amended at a later date if the City's restaurants 12 were at a competitive disadvantage. He added that he was concerned about the competitive 13 issue, but he was also concerned about the community. Mr. Gilligan responded that he thought 14 that was a wise way of handling the situation because it gave the City control. 15 16 Mayor Hodson indicated that he had mixed emotions regarding the issue. He stated he saw it as 17 the City squelching the time businesses were open, and he had not seen any proof that a later 18 closing time would cause problems. 19 20 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he was also struggling with the issue. He questioned 21 whether, from a competitive point of view, staying open until 2:00 a.m. would help the 22 businesses. He noted that he needed further information to form a final opinion. He felt the 23 Council should check documentation from other cities and states to determine if there were 24 negative effects. 25 26 Councilmember Sparks noted that the Council did not have to make a decision immediately; 27 however, they needed to agree to vote on the issue. Councilmember Faust requested that an 28 ordinance be brought before the Council for their vote. 29. 30 Councilmember Sparks asked if a sign needed to be posted regarding the carrying of guns. Mr. 31 Gilligan responded that the City could not post signs because it was not a private entity. Mr. 32 Mornson added that,because of the school, a sign would be posted in City Hall. 33 34 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 35 None. 36 37 I. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS. 38 None. 39 40 XI. ADJOURNMENT. 41 Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. 42 43 44 Respectfully submitted, 45 46 47 Marjorie R. Jenkins