HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 08082000 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIII IIII IIII
100570
Box: 17
Folder: CC PACKETS 1999-2001
Document: CC PACKET 08082000
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
AUGUST 8, 2000
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
PAGE(S)
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
III. ROLL CALL.
IV. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 8, 2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR
MEETING AGENDA.
V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
• VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular
agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address
for the Clerk's recoid, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City
Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically
refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on
an upcoming agenda.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA. ......................................................................... 1 - 16
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests,
in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
elsewhere on the agenda.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. ................................ 17 - 24
A. Resolution 00-054, re: Skate Park ................................... 17 - 22
B. Consider proposed list of election judges
for the September 12, 2000 Primary Election ................... 23 - 24
•
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
• August 8, 2000
Page 2
PAGE(S)
X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF .................................. 25 - 125
A. Review of the Hillcrest Development Co. Preliminary Plan
for the Apache Plaza area and Review Springsted
Letter on Tax Increment Financing 25 - 98
B. Presentation of the proposed 2001 City Budget .............. 99 - 125
XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
• MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS AREA TTACHED.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
1 . City Council Meeting Minutes - July 11 , 2000
2. Licenses/Permits
3. Claims
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 July 25, 2000
4 7:00 p.m.
5 Council Chambers
6 I. CALL TO ORDER.
7 Mayor Cavanaugh called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
8 H. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
9 Mayor Cavanaugh invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
10
11 III. ROLL CALL.
12 Councilmembers present: Mayor Cavanaugh; Councilmembers Sparks,Thuesen, Horst and
13 Hodson
14 Councilmembers absent: None
15 Also present: City Manager Michael Momson; Attorney Jerry Gilligan.
16 IV. APPROVAL OF JULY 25, 2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA.
17 Motion by Hodson to approve the July 25, 2000 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda with the
18 additions mentioned below:
IX. B. 5. 29th Avenue Street Lighting
wo 6. Harding Street
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
23 A. Appreciation Plaque Will Be Presented to Jim Wilke, Patriots Marching Band.
24 Due to the absence of Mr. Wilke, Mayor Cavanaugh postponed this item until later until the
25 meeting.
26 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
27 Mayor Cavanaugh asked for input from the audience for anyone wishing to address an issue that
28 was not on the usual agenda.
29 Mr. Scott Tankenoff, Managing Partner of Hillcrest Development,wished to answer any
30 questions that the Council might have regarding the redevelopment of Apache Plaza.
31 Mayor Cavanaugh noted that the issue of Hillcrest Development/Apache Plaza would be
32 discussed later in the meeting as per the agenda and requested that Mr. Tankenoff address the
33 Council at that time.
34 VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
35 Thuesen requested that the Minutes from the City Council Meeting of July 11, 2000 be removed
9 from the Consent Agenda.
37 Motion by Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda, which consisted of:
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
• Page 2
1 1. Licenses and Permits for Approval;
2 2. Four pages of Verified Claims.
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4 Motion by Horst to approve the July 11, 2000 City Council Meeting Minutes as presented.
5 Voting on the Motion: Cavanaugh, Horst, Hodson, Sparks voted aye.
6 Thuesen abstained due to absence at the meeting of July 11, 2000.
7 The Motion Carried.
8 VIII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
9 A. Resolution 00-058 re: Support of Northwest Youth and Family Services.
10 Mayor Cavanaugh provided background information regarding the subject of Northwest Youth
11 and Family Services. Recently, the City was contacted by the Executive Director of Northwest
12 Youth and Family Services regarding funding for the Ramsey County Corrections Contract
13 which enables the program to provide diversion services to juvenile offenders from the
14 community. It was recently learned that the County Manager has proposed a 50%cut to the
15 funds in the 2001 budget.
06 Consequently,Northwest Youth and Family Services has requested that City Councils in the area
17 consider passing Resolution 00-058 in support of continued funding for the program mentioned
18 above.
19 Motion by Sparks to approve Resolution 00-058, a resolution regarding Ramsey County
20 Corrections Contract,wherein the City Council of the City of St. Anthony strongly encourages
21 the Ramsey County Manager and the Ramsey County Board to provide funding at the same level
22 in 2001 as in 2000, the Diversion Services provided through Northwest Youth and Family
23 Services.
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25 B. Ordinance 2000-003 re: Amend Ordinance Relating to Lot Coverage and Building_to
26 Land Ratio Ord reading).
27 Motion by Hodson to approve the 3rd Reading of Ordinance 2000-003, an Ordinance Relating to
28 Lot Coverage and Building to Land Ratio, Amending Sections 1605 Subd. 44(a) and 1615.05,
29 Subd. 8 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances.
30 Motion carried unanimously.
•
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 3
1 C. Ordinance 2000-004 re: Juvenile Curfew(3rd reading).
2 Mayor Cavanaugh noted for the audience that the proposed Ordinance is simply a rewrite and
3 update of the City's existing curfew ordinance. The,rewrite is being done in order.to bring.the.
4 City's curfew ordinance into compliance with the Hennepin County Ordinance.
5
6 Motion by Thuesen to approve Ordinance 2000-004, an Ordinance Relating to Juvenile Curfew,
7 Amending Section 1105 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances.
8 Motion carried unanimously.
9 IX. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
10 A. Planning_Commission Meeting- July 18, 2000.
11 Mayor Cavanaugh welcomed Lorin Hatch from the Planning Commission. Mr. Hatch began by
12 mentioning that there were two issues to present to the Council at the meeting as set forth below.
13 1. Frontline Church for 2654 Kenzie Terrace: Zoning Ordinance Amendment(Resolution
14 00-059).
15 Mr. Hatch began by explaining that Frontline Church had requested to City to consider
16 adding a Church as a conditional use permit. Mr. Hatch stated that after significant
7 discussion and consideration by the Planning Commission,the Commission decided to
deny the request due to the findings of fact as presented in the July 18, 2000 Planning
19 Commission Meeting Minutes. Mr. Hatch noted that the vote was unanimous by the
20 Planning Commission to deny the request.
21 However, Bill Arrogoni, the spokesperson for Frontline Church, has requested that the
22 issue be postponed for presentation to the City Council until the Church has had an
23 opportunity to confer with counsel.
24 2. Hadi and Roizer Abou-Mourad for 3801 Stinson Boulevard, Conditional Use
25 Permit for a Car Wash at 3813 Stinson Boulevard (Resolution 00-060).
26 Mr. Hatch reviewed for the Council that Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad had submitted an
27 application to build a Fuel Mart Car Wash on their property at 3813 Stinson Boulevard
28 NE. According to City Code,their project requires a permit for conditional use. A .
29 concept review was held before the Commission on June 20,2000. The applicants took
30 the Commission's comments into consideration and resubmitted a complete application
31 to Staff.
32 Mr. Hatch noted that the Planning Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit for
33 Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad based on certain reasons and with certain conditions as
34 outlined in the July 18, 2000 Planning Commission meeting minutes.
•
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 4
1 Horst inquired about the specific objections of the residents and the details of the
2 proposed expansion of the facility.
3 Thuesen noted that there had been discussion at the Planning Commission meeting that
4 sidewalks were considered as part of the request. Mr. Hatch explained that sidewalks
5 were discussed; however, it was determined that the Planning Commission was not
6 comfortable imposing a sidewalk restriction on the applicants.
7 Sparks inquired if the City had the ability to deny a specific request due to the fact that
8 there are several similar-type car washes in the area. Attorney Jerry Gilligan noted that
9 it would not be appropriate for the City to deny a legitimate request based on the fact that
10 there were other car washes in the area.
11 Cavanaugh noted for the applicants that the City is planning on installing sidewalks-on
12 the east side of that area, and he would hope that at some point,the applicants would
13 consider installing sidewalks.
14 Hodson inquired about clarification about the recycling of the ground water. Consultant
15 Charles Habiger noted that the water would be recycled through the storm sewer and .
�6: subsequently through Pigs Eye.
17 Motion by Hodson to approve Resolution 00-060, a Resolution Relating to a Request for
18 a Conditional Use Permit for 3813 Stinson Boulevard, wherein the City Council (in
19 agreement with the findings of the Planning Commission at their July 18, 2000 Meeting),
20 hereby approves the request for a conditional use permit at 3813 Stinson Boulevard.
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22 [return to item V. "Proclamations and Recognitions"on the agenda]
23 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
24 A. Appreciation Plaque will be Presented to Jim Wilke, Patriots Marching Band.
25 Mayor Cavanaugh introduced Mr. Jim Wilke and certain students and members of the
26 marching band.
27 Several students and members of the marching band approached the Council and
28 audience and announced their appreciation and support on behalf of the entire band for
29 Mr. Wilke's 31 years of service and presented Mr. Wilke with a special gift for his
30 dedication.
•
5
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
• Page 5
1 Mayor Cavanaugh then presented to Mr. Wilke on behalf of the City a special Certificate
2 of Appreciation for.his dedication and support to the marching band and for his .
3 outstanding community service.
4 [return to the regular agenda]
5 IX. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
6 B. Engineering Issues Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Will Be Present.
7 Mayor Cavanaugh introduced Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, and invited him to address the
8 Council.
9 Mr. Hubmer explained that there were four items on the agenda to review, and an additional two
10 items that he would like to add to the agenda.
11 1. Sale of Homes on Pahl Avenue (Resolution 00-063).
12 Mr. Hubmer stated that bids were received for the Pahl Avenue Purchase and Removal of
13 Homes Project, and on July 17, 2000,the bids were opened and read aloud. A total of
14 three bids were received, and of those three bids, WSB would recommend Otting House
15 Movers of Lakeville, MN, for a total amount of$11,200.00
06 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-063, a Resolution Approving Sale of Homes
17 for Relocation, wherein the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the
18 sale and relocation of the structures located at 2700 and 2704 Pahl Avenue and awards
19 the sale of said properties to Otting House Movers in the amount of$11,200.00, which
20 bid is deemed to be in the best interests of the City.
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22 2. House Demolition and Pahl Avenue Pond Construction(Resolution 00-064).
23 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-064, a Resolution Approving Demolition of
24 Property and Awarding Bid for Demolition and Pond Construction,wherein the City
25 Council of the City.of St. Avenue and awards,the bid for said demolition and pond
26 construction to G.L. Contracting, Inc., at a cost of$67,882.00, which bid is deemed to be
27 in the best interests of the City.
28 Motion carried unanimously.
29 3. Flood Relief Grant Program.
30 Mr. Hubmer noted that the City had received a total of four applications for participation
31 in the 2000 Flood Relief Grant Program. Each applicant was contacted either by phone
32 or in person to discuss the water problems they have experienced, and to determine their
�3 eligibility for participation in the Flood Relief Grant Program.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000 '
Page 6
1 The primary source of watering entering the home for all applicants was found to be
2 through the foundation, floor, and walls. Upon review of the problem, it was
3 recommended that the applicant install basement drain tile systems and/or provide for
4 positive drainage away from the walls and foundation of the home. These activities are
5 currently not funded by the Flood Proofing Grant Program, thus, all of the applications
6 received in 2000 have not met the qualifying criteria for participation in the program.
7 4. Silver Lake West Evaluation Report.
8 Mr. Hubmer directed the Council's attention to Page 82 of the agenda packets, which
9 depicted a letter dated July 20, 2000 from Mr. Hubmer and reviewed the issue of Silver
10 Lake. Mr. Hubmer reviewed the letter and noted that WSB & Associates has completed
11 a review of the Silver Lake West Evaluation Report dated May 11, 2000 and which
12 report was completed by the Ramsey County Public Works Lake Management Program
13 in cooperation with the Silver Lake West Homeowner's Association and the Rice Creek
14 Watershed District. The objectives of the study were to:
15 * Monitor the inflow-to Silver Lake to determine nutrient and water loads
16 * Measure in-lake water quality during the growing season
17 * Evaluate lake management activities to improve water quality .
* Facilitate the prioritization and implementation of lake management activities
19 The Study showed that the water quality of Silver Lake West has improved between
20 1986-1999. While the water quality of the Lake has generally improved over the past 13
21 years, the water quality is still poor. The recommendations to improve the water quality
22 further include evaluating and implementing Best Management Practices in the
23 watershed, sweeping streets, public education programs, pond maintenance, evaluating
24 the use of lakescaping techniques along the shore, and continued monitoring.
25 Mr. Hubmer noted that the City has one of the best street sweeping programs in the area
26 which would attribute, in part;to the improved water quality of Silver Lake.
27 5. 29th Avenue Street Li hg ting..
28 Mr. Hubmer wished to briefly address the issue of the 29th Avenue Street Lighting. The
29 residents in that area met with the Planning Commission at the Commission's last
30 meeting. It was decided to hold a public forum on August 9, 2000 to obtain additional
31 input. Additionally,NSP Outdoor Lighting will give a presentation and bring posters and
32 displays of potential lighting. The residents will have a chance to review lighting and the
33 consensus will be brought to the Planning Commission, and then presented to the City
34 Council.
35 Mr. Hubmer confirmed that the cables would be buried, and that there would not be
6 additional overhead utilities generated by the decorative lighting. Thuesen stated that
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
• Page 7
1 the issue of burying the cables should be further discussed and further investigated
2 because maintenance of overhead cables might be easier.than underground.
3 6. Harding Street.
4 Mr. Hubmer noted that the appraisal process is proceeding regarding the Harding Street
5 issue. If the project is to proceed this fall, the schedule is running about 2-3 weeks
6 behind; however, if the project ends up moving to next fall, the current schedule of the
7 project is sufficient.
8 Cavanaugh thanked Mr. Hubmer for his input and attendance at the meeting.
9 X. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
10 Mayor Cavanaugh opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m.
11 A. Amendment to Tax Increment Financing District#3 -Ramsey County (Resolution 00-
12 061 .
13 City Manager Michael Mornson explained that the City would be considering the elimination of
14 certain parcels from the existing Apache Plaza tax increment financing district and the
15 establishment of a new tax increment financing district containing these parcels.
06 The new tax increment financing district is proposed to include the tax parcels which contain
17 Apache Plaza Shopping Center, and the adjacent property consisting of the site of the former
18 New Market Store and the Taco Bell. Since a portion of these parcels is presently included in a
19 tax increment financing district established by the HRA in 1992 it will be necessary to remove
20 these parcels from the existing tax increment financing district prior to including them in the new
21 tax increment financing district.
22 Attorney Jerry Gilligan recommended as a course of procedure to take public testimony, close
23 the public hearing, and then the Council should reconsider the proposed Resolution at a later
24 date in August 2000 in order to resolve some open issues.
25 In that respect, Mayor Cavanaugh invited input from the audience through the avenue of the
26 public hearing. .
27 Mr. Bob Strakota, consultant for Hillcrest Development, approached the Council. Mr. Strakota
28 explained that the TIF assistance is needed because the property requires significant capital
29 improvements in order to get the property up to par so that remodeling can take place. The $4
30 million of assistance would go into the building structure, and the additional $1 million would go
31 towards correcting the watershed issue. Additionally, Mr. Strakota noted that there were issues
32 with Herbergers as well, and the TIF funds would be used to resolve that problem.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 8
1 Issues surrounding the Herbergers retail store were discussed and the opposition Hillcrest
2 Development has received with the Herbergers store and how that opposition relates to the TIF
3 issue.
4 Cavanaugh expressed his opinion that the Herbergers issue must be resolved before all of the
5 issues of Apache Plaza are resolved due to the fact that the TIF funds are involved.
6 Cavanaugh thanked Mr. Tankenoff and Mr. Strakota for their input.
7 Raymond Haik, 2901 Silver Lake Court NE, noted that he was present at the meeting to express
8 a concern that he developed after reading the paper and watching previous Council meetings.
9 Mr. Haik stated that he was concerned that the City was embarking on a risky investment. -Mr.
10 Haik further stated that he believed that the City would need to obtain some certainty with the
11 expenditures and zoning in order to avoid the problems that have been experienced in the past
12 with the property known as Apache Plaza. Mr. Haik presented different opinions and options
13 with respect to the potential TIF funding of Apache Plaza.
14
15 Attorney Jerry Gilligan responded to many of Mr. Haik's concerns and clarified some of the
�6 issues that are before the Council.
17 Mayor Cavanaugh noted that he appreciated the comments and concerns that Mr. Haik had
18 expressed.
19 Mr. Gilligan noted that the issue at hand was to determine whether a TIF District would be
20 appropriate. Mr. Gilligan further noted that establishing the TIF District would not denote funds
21 at this point.
22 Mr. Tankenoff approached the Council and attempted to allay some of the concerns of Mr. Haik.
23 Mayor Cavanaugh invited additional input from the audience, and hearing none, closed the
24 public hearing at 8:55 p.m.
25 Motion by Horst to table Resolution 00-061 until August 22, 2000.
26 Motion carried unanimously.
•
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
• Page 9
1 B. Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Area#3 and on the Proposed Tax Increment
2 Financiniz Plan for Tax Increment Financing District#5 -Ramsey Coghv (Resolution 00-062).
3
4 Motion by Horst to table Resolution 00-062 until August 22, 2000.
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6 X. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
7 City Manager Michael Mornson has noted that the City would be applying for a major grant
8 from the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission to assist with the Central Park Redevelopment
9 project.
10
11 Momson further reported that SEH has submitted the 33rd Avenue award_ for MnDOT to the
12 State Department of Transportation.
13 Morrison reported that the City Manager and Mayor would be meeting with the Superintendent
14 of the School, as well as the School Board Chairman regarding funding options for Central Park.
15 Hodson did not have a report.
06 Horst did not have a report.
17 Sparks reported that the Village Fest Committee continues to search for participants for the
18 parade.
19 Thuesen reported that he had drafted a proposed performance report for the City Manager and he
20 would be asking the Councilmembers to review the form and return comments to him for further
21 implementation.
22 Cavanaugh reported that the National Night Out Block Parties event was upcoming, and in that
23 respect, Cavanaugh distributed a list of the blocks signed up to participate. Each
24 Councilmember reviewed the,list and chose the blocks that they would each visit during the
25 National Night Out.
26 XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
27 None.
1®
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
• Page 10
1 XIU. ADJOURNMENT.
2 Motion by Hodson to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m:
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4 Respectfully submitted,
5 Sue Selseth
6 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
7
8 Mayor
9 ATTEST:
10 City Clerk
11
Saint Anthon y e Villa g
DATE: August 8, 2000 Approval.
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
Heating Contractor License:
Suburban Air, Minneapolis
Heating & Cooling Two, Inc., Minneapolis, MN
• Multiple Dwelling License:
Walker Senior Services, 2626 Kenize Terrace
•
12
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLP
8/01/2000 14: Check Register GL540R-V06.27 PAGE
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT___
FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING
008216 A T. & T WIRELESS SERVICE 12360 08/09/00 61 .67
000020 AA BATTERY CO 12361 08/09/00 37.45
008471 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 12362 08/09/00 _ 43.28
008666 ALLEGRO 1.2.363 08/09/00 51 .50
007338 AMERICAN EXPRESS 12364 08/09/00 90.98
AMERICAN TEST CENTER, IN 1.2.365 08/09/00 400.00
008512
008660 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL_ 12366 08/09/0() 25.00
008505 BATTERY CITY INC . 12367 08/09/00 31 .90
005136 BRISKI/TIM 12368 08/09/00 ___ __3.02_
007386 CASTLE INSPECTION SERVIC 1.2369 08/09/00 8,228.50
008644 CHAMPPS AMERICANA 12370 08/09/00 99.91
.00006 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 1.2371 08/09/00 450.00
004107 COMPTON 'S COMMERCIAL CLN 12372 08/09/00 3;834 .00
007334 CONNELLY INDUST. ELECTRO 1.2373 08/09/00 767.94
008486 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MA 12374 08/09/00 1 ,432.20
007382 CROWN FENCE & WIRE COMPA 1.2375 08/09/00 140.00
008431 DAKOTA COUNTY TECH. COLL 12376 08/09/00 500 .00
000800 DAVIES WATER EQUIP CO. 1.2377 08/09/00 200._15
.00001 DELL MARKETING L. P. 12378 08/09/00 2,39°x.20^
00504.8 DPC INDUSTRIES INC 1.2379 08/09/00 6.00
008284 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTW 12380 08/09/0_0_ 159 .75
008001 EMERGENCY MED PRODUCTS 1.2381 08/09/00 26.20
008440 FISHER/MERLE 12382 08/09/0() 37 .50
008647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 1.2383 08_/_09/00 1.8_.44_
---- 001025 G & K SERVICES 12384 08/09/00 ---------67 .39 -- -
001030 G & K SERVICES 12385 08/09/00 375.36
._00002_ HALET BUILDING & REMODEL 12386 08/09/0() 9 .40
00142(? HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 1.2387 08/09/00 650.66
001505 HENN CO SHERIFF 12388 08/09/00 1 , 180 .02
008365 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 1.2389 08/09/00 2,555.9_8
008239 HOSKA/JIM 12390 08/09/00 8.98
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE .12391 08/09/00 8.79
007352
.00003 LAMERE CONCRETE & 12392 08/09/00 4,412.00
008680 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & 1.2393 08/09/00 957.00
.00004 LEOFFELHOLZ/JAMES 12394 08/09/00 11 .65
008229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 12395 08/09/00 2,86_7.51
008390 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES 12396 08/09/00 8,690 . 13
002100 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT CO 1.2397 08/09/00 36.00
002125 MALENICK/JOHN 12398 08/09/00 7_9.42
007835 METROCALL 1.2399 08/09/00 49.38
TAN COUNCIL 12400 08/09/00 30, 160.00
002240 METROPOLI
008269 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 12401 08/09/00 54.95
008525 MN CITY-CNTY MGMT ASSOCI 12402 08/09/00 77.00
.00001 MUSKA ELECTRIC CO 12403 08/09/00 4,215.00
008282 NETLINK INTERNATIONAL 12404 08/09/00 63_8.49
008326 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 3.2405 08/09/00 190.43
008519 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION C 12406 08/09/00 6,391 .69
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 12407 08/09/00 109.02
13
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILL
— • 08/01/2000 14: Check Register GL540R—V06.27 PAGE
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING
_ 008277 OFFICEMAX .CREDIT PLAN 12408 08/09/00 7 .48
_ 005168 OHL./JOHN 1.2409 08/09/00 46.57
008327 P.G.S. INDUSTRIES 12410 08/09/00 92 .50__
_ 002820 PETTY CASH—FIRSTAR ST. A 1.2411 08/09/00 135.08
008369 POSTMASTER 12412 08/09/00 1 ,275.00
.00005 REGIONS HOSPITAL 12413 08/09/00 146.00
008428 RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING 12414 08/09/00 60.00
005293 ROAD RUNNER 1241.5 08/09/00 10.45
003350 SEH—RCM 12416 08/09/00 19,_414.02_
008483 SKB 3.2417 08/09/00 85.00
_ 005285 SROGA 'S 12418 08/09/00 133.54
008397 STEEL TECH INC . 3.2419 08/09/00 282.23
003490 STREICHER 'S 12420 08/09/00 : 248.77
_ 007311 SUBURBAN COLLISION & PAI 1.2421 08/09/00 100.00
003260 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 12422 08/09/00 60.39__
008681 TAMARACK MATERIALS, INC . 12423 08/09/00 380.21
_ 007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 12424 08/09/00 517 .26
003560 TRACY PRINTING 12425 08/09/00 1 ,650.00__
008336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 12426 08/09/00 641 .88
002700 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 12427 08/09/00 68.09
008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 12428 08/09/00_ _3.41 .56
005298 WARNING LITES OF MN 12429 08/09/00 70.62
008273 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC . 12430 08/09/00 35,595.66
008493 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 12431 08/09/00 450.00
FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING 144,699. 15
14
-,-BRC_ FINANCIAL_ SYS_FEM_-- 5T-.-_ANTHOL�•I f t
ILLA
8/02/2000 10: Check Register GL540R-V06.27 PAGE
BANK. - ---VENDOR.-- ---- --CHECK#...-- -.DATE--------- AMOUNT
LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008216 A T &- T WIRELESS SERVICE 17112 08%09/00 65. 16
004225 ALLIANT FOODSERVICE 17113 08/09/00 1 , 638.7It
PAPER-CO.- ---,_--17'1.1.4_-08./C)9/C)0--------._ ..... . .. 36 . 61
004015 AMERIPRIDE LINEN 17115 08/09/00 737.75
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 17116 08/09/00 1 ,738 . 02.
_..00}4.08.0 ----_---C,HISAGO._.LAKES DIST. CO.-,-------------171.17.08/09/_00.--- 4, °•00.30
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 17118 08/09/00 691 . 38
004087 CITY PAGES 17119 08/09/00 234.00
0040,95.-----.--COCA_.COLA _ ---._... .._..17.1.20._.08/09/0.[) _- -... .. 1 , 129 . 90
008557 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 171.21 08/09/00 17.04
008437 DIRECTV 17122 08/09/00 37 . 35
. _--- ---_-_ _.00001 ---DOOR MASTERS, INC. --_._---1_7,1.._23. 03,/09/00 ------_-.. . . ._289.20
004120 EAGLE WINE_ CO 17124 08/09/00 379 . 90
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 17125 08/09/00 A-6,687. 70
004130 ECOLAB 17126 08/09/00 149 . 05
004135 E:LE:CTRO WATCHMAN INC 17127 08/09/00 239.63
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 17128 08/09/OC) 5,273 . c:4
001030 G e K SE:RVIC;ES 17129 08/09/00 76.96
004157 GETTMAN HOWIE, INC . 17130 08/09/0'0 237 . 65
004175 . GRIGGS .COOPER & CO INC 17131 08/09/00 9, 673 . 1.2
004201 HF_GGI-E S---PI_ZZA ----------- -- 17.132_,.08/.0 /00. ._ 136 . 00
008617 HINNENKANP/WAYNE 17133 08/09/00 63 .5[)
00A-;r07 HOHENSTEIN 'S, INC 1'7134 08/09/00 1 ,4-'c: .7`_>
004205 HOME: JUICE CO 17135 08/09/00
.00002 IMPAC.'T MARKETING EDS INC 17136 08/09/00 1 ,6_6 . 90
00854.7 INTERNATIONAL CIGARS, IN 17137 08/09/00 1 ,048 .59
004220 JOHNSON BROS. LIQ. 17133 08/09/00 37, 4.10 .71
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 17139 08/09/00 A9, 1.7A .5c
008680 LARSON ALLEN WEI' HAIR & 17140 03/09/0[) 69 . 00
004229 LARSON/MICHAEL 17141 08/09/00 236.60
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 17142 08/09/00 116 .88
004.265 MARK VII SALES INC 17143 08/09/00 30,229. 16
004271 MEDIA ONE 17144 08/09/00 154.21
004.272 METZ FAKING CO 17145 08/09/00 128.65
.00004 MINNESOTA WAABI 17146 08/09/00 20 . 00
:00003 MMBA 17147- 08/09/00 620.00
004299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO. 17148 08/09/00 19 .05
004334 NORTHEASTER 17149 08/09/00 942.30
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 17150 08/09/00 53.95
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 17151 08/09/00 45.84
004346 OMEGA PUBLISHING 17152 08/09/0[) 250.00
007318 OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 171.53 08/09/00 70.00
004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 17154 08/09/00 . 950 .66
004355 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 171.55 08%09/00 354.74-
004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS. 17156 08/09/00 13,736 . 44
008495 PRIMETIME TRADING COMPAN 17157 08%09/00 186.00
004376 PRIOR WINE= CO 17158 08/09/00 11 ,806 .35
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 17159 08/09/00 2,939.92
A5
BR_C- FINANCIAL SYSTEM _ _ -__ST_.-_.ANTHOtJY VILLA,
08/02./2000 10: Check: Register GL540R—VO6 .27 PAGE
HANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
004386 R & D SALES, INC . 17160 08/09/00 1 ,26 9.00
008597 R. D. HANSON ASSOC . , INC . 17161 03/09/00 115.75
-_- - - 004393 RON 'S ICE 17162_ 08/09/00._._._.. ._..-- .. 21,089.82
.00005 SE:SAC , INC . 17163 08/09/00 267.60
005004 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS 17164 08/09/00 9.37
004466 SYSCO—MINNESOTA 17165 08/09/00 _ - - 1 ,344.57
004468 TOTAL_ REGISTER SYSTEMS 17166 08/09/00 365. 25
004490 VAL—PAK OF MINNESOTA 17167 08/09/00 11500.00
008316 WINE COMPANY/THE 17168 08/09/00 152 . 04
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 235,493.67 :
16
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAG
'W/02/2000 09: Chec4.- Register GL540R-V06.27 PACE
BANK VENDOR CHF_CK## DATE AMOUNT
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
003160 FIRSTAR ST AN THONY BANK 16534 07/31/00) 11 , 178.90.
000670 CITY COUNTY ' CREDIT UNION 16535 07/31/00 685.00
000055 AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY 16536 07/31/00 14-33.52
b04208 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 16537 07/31/00 280.00
008313 MN CHILD SUPPORT PYMT CF_ 16533 07/31/00 4225.5c5
004380 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREME 16539 07/31/00 1 ,745.98
00423 LMGIT % BERKL_EY RISK SF_ 16540 07/31/00) 130.44-
3004318 NAT FINANCIAL INS CO 16541 07/31/00 9.50
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16542 07/31/00 15,000 .00
0031'b0 F'IRST'AR ST AMITHOPJY BANK 16543 C)7/31/00 6,000.00
008'532 STEINWORTH/JIM 16544 07/31/00 200 . 00
004.250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 16545 07/31/00 75.00
008�5Q SCOOTER TRAS 16546 07/31/00 350.00
004401 ST.A.LIQUOR #1 PC 16547 07/31/00 201 .46
004404 STONF_HOUSE BAR & GRILL 16548 07/31/00 260.00
003166? .. FIRSTAR ST AI'dTHOKlY BAMIK 16549 07/31/00 10,000.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANE{ 16550 07/31/00 15,000 .00
004.250 L.UNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 1.6551 07/31/00 150.00
00x649 JAM BAND/THE 16552 07/31/00 370 .00
.00001 GROSS GOLF COURSE 16553. 07/31/00 3,622.00
• .00002 VERSATILE VEHICLES 16554 . 07/31/00 958.50
004404 S"fONEHOUSE BAR & GRILL _--i'655-567/3 1/0 1
6555 07/31/0.0 716.00
.00003 SWORDS/LOB 16556 07/31/00 1 ,423.10
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16557 07/31/00 1.0,933.78
000670 CITY COUh1T`! CREDIT UNION 165563 07/31/00 685.00
000055 AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY 16559 '07/31/00 143.52
00408 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 16560 07/31/00 280 .00
008289 NICPERS LIFE INSURANCE 1.6561 07/31/00 36.00
0043 80 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIRE-ME 16562 0'7/31/00 1 ,735 .00
008313 MN CHILD SUPPORT PYMT CE 16563 07/31/00 425.55
002850 MF_DICA CHOICE 16564 07/31/00 5,032. 19
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16565 07/31/00 81000.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 1656607/31/00 15,000.00
008504 GALLAGHER/DENNIS P. ( RED 16567 07/31/00 375.00
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. .16568 07/31/00 75. 00
008632 INSIDE STRAIGHT 16569 07/31/00 .350.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16570 07/31/00 8,000.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16571 07/31/00 15,000.00
008649 JAM BAND/THE 16572 07/31/00 370.00
004250 LUNDGREI:I/h1ATTHEW H. 16573 07/31/00 150.00
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 135,556.39 #X.
•
IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
A. Resolution 00-054
B. Consider Proposed List of Election Judges
17
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 25, 2000 Meeting Date:August 8, 2000
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: STAFF REPORT ON PROPOSED SKATE PARK
• Plans and costs were developed for the construction of a Skate Park by the Parks Commission
with input on the configuration/design from a Youth Task Force headed by a St. Anthony High
School youth representative from the Safe and Affordable Youth Activities Commission. The
Parks Commission recommended approval at their June 12, 2000 meeting. The Skate Park
would be located behind the Community Center over the old Central Park hockey site. Bids
were received for the Skate Park design and construction; surface paving; and fencing and can
be executed independently.
Funds for the project would be transferred to the Park Improvement Fund from the 1999
profits of the Liquor Operations as outlined in the attached memo from the Finance Director.
This skate park is part of the overall plan for the redevelopment of Central Park. Because the
park is a Tier 1 facility (less than three feet), there is no additional cost for insurance.
RECOMMENDA770N
Recommend approval of Resolution 00-054 which authorizes funding and approves the vendors
as listed in the resolution (attached).
•
l�
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 14, 2000
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: SKATE PARK FUNDING
I have reviewed the proposed costs for the procurement and installation of a skate park.
The project was formulated on a planning guideline of"not to exceed" $50,000.
Combining the bids from three vendors the youth task force has concluded that the cost
of the project would be approximately $45,000. My suggestion for funding of the
project would be to designate a portion of the 1999 liquor profits (see attached).
It has been past practice that profits from liquor operations are a funding source for park
improvements and capital equipment purchases.
• Recommendation:
Council approves the transfer of$50,000 from Liquor Operations to Fund 4501 Park
Improvement Fund to provide funding of the proposed Skate Park Project. Any monies
that remain unspent could be used by Public Works to make mini-improvements to the
area or purchase additional equipment.
•
19
1999 Reserves.
(General Fund & Liquor Profits)
Total Revenues: $3,395,153
Total Expenditures: ($3,107,987)
Non-Budgeted Expense ****($ 43 008
General Fund: $ 244,158
Capital Equipment - Opticom ($ 65,000)
- Bike Patrol ($ 2,500)
- Leaders Software Upgrade ($ 30,000)
Cable Reserves Transfer ($ 25,197)
• 1999 Unspent General Fund Reserves $ 1219461
Liquor Profits: $ 205,225
Less: General Fund transfer 65 000
Profit After Transfers $ 140,225
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $2619686
**** Non-Budgeted Expense:
Y2K Overtime $ 4,489
Insurance Reserves $ 199295
Schnitzer Legal $ 19436
VillageFest $ 4,500
Fire Dept Emergency Repair $ 13,288
$ 439008
2®
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 31,2000
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Jay Hartman, Director of Public Works
RE: Skate Park Schedule
After the St. Anthony City Council approves the plans and costs associated with the
construction of the skateboard park the following is a schedule for the completion:
1) Preparation and Paving: T.A. Schifsky is scheduled to prepare and
pave the skate surface the week of August 14th through August 18, 2000.
T.A. Schifsky & Sons,Inc. $11,000.00
• 2) True Ride: The delivery and installation of skate park equipment is
scheduled for completion by August 26, 2000.
True Ride: $30,038.04
Equipment $25,888.04
Delivery 650.00
Installation 3,500.00
3) Crown Fence: The fencing company is scheduled to have the skate park
fenced in and completed by the 31"of August.
Crown Fence and Wire Company: $3,984.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $45,022.04
21
G l�Y9. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. OF MINNESOTA, INC.
June 13, 2000
Mr. Roger Larson
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
RE: Skate Board Park
Dear Mr. Larson:
The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) has published the two
enclosed articles on Skate Parks that should answer many of the questions about
insurance, liability, and legal concerns. Specific considerations are:
1.) Tier I Facilities. Skate parks with all structures generally less than three feet in total
• height will not be charged an additional premium for municipal liability insurance.
Other controls designed to reduce skate boarders injuries are outlined in the articles.
2) Property Insurance. The premium for $45,000 insurance is approximately $212.
3) Claims Costs. The City has a large insurance deductible of$10,000 each occurrence,
which would apply to any claim for the amount of the loss and defense costs. In
addition, any of these paid and reserved claims costs would be charged against your
City's loss experience, and would affect your premiums over a three year policy
period.
The LMCIT Loss Control representative should be involved from the proposal stage
through the opening of the Skate Park to avoid insurance concerns after the fact.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Carl A. Bennetsen
•
Minnesota Iowa
7825 Washington Avenue South,Suite 300 Minneapolis,MN 55439-2433 1906 Highway 71 North,P.O. Box 918 Okoboji,IA 51355-0918
Phone 612-944-8885 Fax 612-944-9795 Phone 712-332-2667 Fax 712-332-2779
22
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
• RESOLUTION 00-054
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A SKATE PARK;
AUTHORIZING FUNDING AND APPROVING
VENDORS FOR THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council and Parks Commission desire to construct a skate park to be located
behind the Community Center and over the old Central Park hockey site; and
WHEREAS, the Parks Commission gathered information for this proposed project and submitted the
following for the City Council's approval:
Vendors/Costs
Skate Park Design and Construction True Ride
Equipment total $25,888.04
Delivery $ 650.00
Installation $ 3,500.00
Total $30,038.04
Surface Paving T. A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
Price $11,000.00
Total $11,000.00
• Fencing Crown Fence and Wire Co.
Price $ 3,984.00
Total $ 3,984.00
Grand Total $45,022.04
WHEREAS, it has been proposed that funds of$50,000.00 for said project be transferred from the
1999 Liquor Operations profits to the Park Improvement Fund.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
approves the above recommended vendors to construct a Skate Park and authorizes $50,000.00 for said
project be transferred from the 1999 Liquor Operations profits to the Park Improvement Fund.
Adopted this day of 92000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
• Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
23
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 1, 2000 Meeting Date:August 8: 2000
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk
ITEM: PROPOSED ELECTION JUDGES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
The following is the proposed list of Election Judges for the September 12, 2000 Primary
Election:
PRECINCT 1, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Patricia Bridgeman, Chair 2900 West Armour Terrace
• Linda Gooden 2605-West Armour Terrace
Mary Schwaab 2913 Stinson Boulevard
Elaine Gorshe 2821 Stinson Boulevard
Mary Rockwood 3404 Silver Lake Road
PRECINCT 2, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Mary Louise Inhofer, Chair 2501 Lowry Avenue, #0-14
Kathlyn Clemens 3412 Edward Street
Susan Bodurtha 3309 Wendhurst
Charlene Peterson 3112 - 36`h Avenue NE
Anne Arndt 3520 Coolidge Street
Nancy Klucas T3529 Roosevelt Street
•
24
• PRECINCT 1, RAMSEY COUNTY
Marjorie Madden, Chair 3701 Foss Road
Valerie Taylor 3540 Harding Street
James Paul 3739 Foss Road
Marjorie Dow 4081 Foss Road
Gayle Mattison 3442 Silver Lane
Council approval is also required for Judy Monson, Sandy Simon, Lynette Felegy, and Geri
Harrier to serve as absentee voting witnesses.
•
•
X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
A. Review Hillcrest Development Preliminary
and Final Plan for the Apache Plaza area and
Review Springsted Letter on TIF
B. Presentation of 2001 City Budget
C. City Manager
DIRA 7
•1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 25
2 PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING
3 AUGUST 1, 2000
4 7:00 PM
5 CALL TO ORDER.
6 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm.
7 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
8 Chair Bergstrom invited the Commission and audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
9 ROLL CALL.
10 Present: Chair Bergstrom; Commissioners Tillman, Hanson, Thomas, Melsha, Hatch,
11 and Stille.
12 Absent: None.
13 Also present: Spencer A. Isom, Assistant City Manager.
14 APPROVE AUGUST 1, 2000 SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
15 Motion by Bergstrom, seconded by Melsha to approve the August 1, 2000 Special Planning
16 Commission meeting agenda with the following changes:
07 Add: PUBLIC INPUT
18 Chair Bergstrom asked if there was any public input before opening the Public Hearing. There
19 was none.
20 Under EK. COMMISSION INPUT, the date of the next Council meeting is August 22, 2000.
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING
23 ITEM:
24 I. Public Hearings.
25 A. Hillcrest Development's preliminary and final development plan for the Apache
26 Plaza area that includes a rezoning from "C" district to a Planned Unit
27 Development (PUD).
28 Chair Bergstrom briefly explained the background of the request and that there had
29 been many meetings with the developers, City staff, attorneys and consultants for both
30 the developer and City regarding this issue. He said that reviewing the entire packet
31 was not required. At the Planning Commission's June 20 meeting the rezoning and
�2 development plan were reviewed and Commissioners recommended approval to the
3 City Council. The City Council;'at their June 27 regular meeting referred the project
Page ? 26
•
1 back to the Commission requesting more definition and commitment from the
2 developers.
3 Assistant City Manager Isom explained that Exhibit A had been excluded from the
4 preliminary and final plans but had been distributed to Commissioners and the public
5 for tonight's meeting. He indicated that John Shardlow, DSU, consultant for Hillcrest
6 Development and William Soth, City Attorney would speak.
7 Mr. Shardlow presented the narrative in Exhibit A. He assured that there has been no
8 misrepresentation by Mr. Tankenoff of Hillcrest Development, but Exhibit_A was
9 merely a narrative of the lists that had been previously submitted for the project, giving
10 more definition of their plans.
11 The narrative (Exhibit A) begins by stating that the uses and activities conducted on the
12 subject property (to be called Silver Lake Centre) shall be the high tech office campus
13 setting including the baseline projects identified in the PUD narrative and that
14 flexibility is integral to the project. As Mr. Shardlow read Exhibit A, he suggested a
15 typo change under "Permitted Uses", the entire paragraph should be stricken under that
16. item and placed at the end of the narrative, with the exception of the last sentence
�7 which should be kept under permitted uses and reads: "Only storage as allowed
8 pursuant to the existing Zoning Ordinance in a commercial district will be allowed.".
19 Mr. Shardlow continued with permitted uses as follows:
20 (i) administrative and executive offices for personnel engaged in general
21 administrative, supervisory, purchasing, accounting and other functions related
22 to general office, high technology office, printing and medical businesses;
23 (ii) research, training, synthesis, and analysis facilities and testing laboratories;
24 (iii) restaurants; and
25 (iv) retail and banking facilities intended to support primarily the tenants and
26 customers within this development.
27 In addition, Mr. Shardlow explained the last paragraph under "Permitted Uses" should
28 be deleted and placed at the end of the narrative.
29 Because lease up is not expected immediately, Exhibit A listed "Accessory Uses" for
30 the property: warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, fabrication, light manufacturing,
31 assembly, processing and similar uses that are incident, or support to the permitted uses
�2 listed above.
i
Page 27
1 Fallback Uses was renamed Interim Uses in Exhibit A. These include
2 warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, fabrication, light manufacturing, assembly,
3 processing and similar uses that are.not incident or accessory to the permitted uses
4 described above and that they shall be allowed as interim uses for,ten.years after the
5 date of adoption of the ordinance. Exhibit A also adds under "Interim Uses" is the
6 following: "If any of these uses remain after this period, and the Applicant has
7 completed all of its obligations regarding all landscaping, exterior improvements,
8 drainage improvements and signage as required under the "Minimum Plan" as set out
9 in the PUD narrative, these uses shall become permitted uses within the Silver Lake
10 Centre development.".
11 Shardlow referred to Exhibit O but indicated Exhibits I, J, and K are more indicative of
12 Hillcrest's intentions for the building.
13 Shardlow continued to read Exhibit A with the following: "None of these businesses or
14 activities will cause exterior image or character of the Centre to be downgraded, or
15 have-any adverse effects on the surrounding neighborhood. The Centre will include all
16 necessary loading areas and mechanical equipment as regulated by the PUD.". In
17 conclusion, Exhibit A states that the existing Herbergers store may stay for a period of
18 8 years.
09 When asked about differences in the "Preferred Plan" and the "Interim Plan" as it
20 relates to Tax Increment Financing (TIF), Mr. Shardlow responded that Hillcrest was
21 presented an incentive to reach a value for the project, and the higher the value of the
22 property, the higher TIF they will receive. If they reach the "Preferred Plan" they will
23 receive all of the TIF. He reminded the Commissioners and audience that Hillcrest will
24 spend $6 million of their own money toward the concept plan, but of course, cannot
25 guaranty a definitive set of improvements.
26 Commissioner Tillmann asked Mr. Shardlow if existing businesses can remain and if
27 they will be under the new or old uses. Shardlow stated that the process would be
28 reviewed and that Hillcrest needs other uses than permitted uses, as outlined in Exhibit
29 A and the PUD in the event leasing does not reach its anticipated high.
30 Commissioner Thomas wondered if Hillcrest could use TIF if they use the Interim
31 Uses. Shardlow indicated TIF is driven by the value created by marketing the
32 property. Thomas then asked if Exhibit A meant that no Interim Uses would be used
33 for 10 years. Shardlow responded that if Hillcrest is not successful in leasing all of the
34 properties, then that is when the Interim Uses would begin.
35 Commissioner Melsha wondered who came up with the 10 years and Shardlow
6 indicated he did. He again emphasized that Hillcrest is obligated to do the
7 improvements to the property, as stated in the PUD.
DRAFT
Pagf -. 28
•1 Commissioner Hatch expressed his concern regarding noise and the exterior of the
P g g
2 building. Hatch wondered how the City will enforce these issues. Shardlow referred to
3 Exhibit A which.spells out that this project will have hi tech uses and that the uses
4 inside will not downgrade the aesthetics.
5 Commissioner Hanson asked if Exhibit A replaces Shardlow's previous list and
6 Shardlow indicated he wanted to do a narrative rather than the list because he felt the
7 narrative better clarified Hillcrest's expectations and goals for the property.
8 Commissioner Stille inquired about occupancy and what would be the actual marketing
9 time. Shardlow said they are marketing from this point forward.
10 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Shardlow and asked City Attorney Soth to speak.
11 Mr. Soth noted that a Development Commission which is comprised of City
12 Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners cannot review the project as it is
13 completed. Staff can only make sure the project complies with the conditions agreed
14 upon.
15 Mr. Soth further clarified the TIF incentive for Hillcrest. If Hillcrest only does the
6 minimal improvements, they will see little or no TIF. If the Preferred Plan is reached,
7 Hillcrest will receive TIF accordingly. He stated that if Hillcrest does not perform,
18 they do not receive any TIF.
19 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Soth and asked Anthony Gleekel, a Hillcrest consultant,
20 to speak.
21 Mr. Gleekel indicated he is the primary author of the July 25 Development Plan.
22 Gleekel spoke of Hillcrest's need for flexibility and use of the Interim Uses. He said the
23 new plan is the same as the first plan except the new plan clarifies the landscaping,
24 drainage, signage, traffic and parking issues.
25 Mr. Gleekel responded to an inquiry about baseline comparisons by saying that the
26 Council and others toured other Hillcrest projects similar to Apache and that Hillcrest's
27 projects are highly thought of. He stated a baseline comparison of the internal plan
28 depends on the tenants and that the preferred plan is usually defined by tenants.
29 Mr. Gleekel referred to Exhibit O as the minimum plan and Exhibits I-K show more
30 building detail. He said there is more detail in this plan than in the first. He indicated
31 the signage somewhat depends on Herbergers and the lighting has not been revised.
32 They are still unsure of what part Herbergers will play in the project. For example, if
�3 Herbergers stays as an Interim Use, they may need additional retail. He concluded by
DQaf� `�
Page . 29
1 saying that Exhibit A defines where they want to be and that the PUD will incorporate
2 everything.
3 Chair Berg questioned the ten year timetable._Gleekel stated that Hillcrest needs that
4 flexibility and were comfortable with it, but typical leases are usually for 7 years.
5 Commissioner Tillmann asked Mr. Gleekel to address traffic issues. Gleekel explained
6 if retail is eliminated and the preferred hi tech use is successful, improvements would
7 need to be made to the infrastructure. He indicated this issue had been studied and it
8 was determined that even if these proposed uses would generate traffic, it would be less
9 than if the property was entirely retail. Tillmann said her main area of concern is the
10 amount of traffic that would be passing by Wilshire Elementary School. Bergman
11 interjected that the report clearly indicates there should not be a substantial increase in
12 traffic on any of the thoroughfares.
13 Commissioner Thomas indicated the City is applying for a Planning Grant from the
14 Metropolitan Council through their Livable Communities Program. However, the City
15 will not know of its status until December, 2000. He wanted to know if Hillcrest is
16 willing to wait for development of the New Market site. Gleekel said Hillcrest is aware
17 that they need to return to the Council for that site. .
108 Commissioner Stille referred to Exhibit , the lighting parking plan. Gleekel said
Q g g and P gP
19 the lighting standards have not yet been developed by Hillcrest but assured that lighting
20 will be consistent with the City's plans.
21 Chair Bergstrom listed the three issues which will require Hillcrest to return to the
22 City:
23 1) Signage plan (Mr. Isom indicated the City has a building inspector for this issue
24 and issue #2 below as well).
25 2) Lighting plan.
26 3. Redevelopment of the New Market site.
27 Bergstrom noted that the City is in the process of studying lighting issues on MSA
28 streets within the City and that the Plan should tie in aesthetically with those lighting
29 plans.
30 Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest Development, stated the community space (about 7,000
31 square feet) concept is still in the Plan, but it is unclear how it would best represent the
32 community, i.e., restaurant, meeting rooms, etc. They, therefore, decided to wait to
33 specify any uses for the community space.
•
Page 30
01 Chair Bergstrom asked Mr. Gleekel about the si a e. Mr. Gleekel responded that
2 certain clients have different expectations on signs and that Hillcrest wants minimum
3 signage. Gleekel also assured Thomas that the Preferred Plan was made available to
4 the public.
5 Mr. Tankenoff reasserted that Hillcrest not does want to mislead or disappoint the
6 public. He wants the public to know the worst case scenario as well as the Preferred
7 Plan and be up front about all aspects of the project. He feels that Hillcrest and
8 everyone concerned must be clear on what happens if the plan does not work. He feels
9 that Apache is in its present state because this was not done in the past.
10 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Gleekel and Mr. Takenoff. Bergstrom then asked for
11 public input and that it be limited to 5 minutes for each person.
12 Allen Otte, 3508 Skycroft, indicated he has read the plan and toured Hillcrest's other-
13 facilities. He feels Hillcrest has done a good job with its other properties. However,
14 as a trained engineer, he indicated the project needs a firmer plan. He compared this
15 project to the one Hillcrest did on Stinson and he would not like to see something done
16 like that project. He said the Preferred Plan is fine, but the Interim Plan is unclear. He
17 predicted this project would fold in 6 months if issues are not made more definite. He
108 felt the Planning Commission should table.the Plan and until the City knows the status
9 of the Met Council's grant.
20 Perry Thorvig, 3112 Townview, indicated he has been a City Planner for 32 years and
21 has worked on other Hillcrest properties and that they are very good..He does not want
22 Exhibit O at all, but Exhibits I, J, and K are fine. He wants the Plan to be much more
23 detailed.
24 Raymond Haik, 2901 Silver Lake Terrace, stated he has been an attorney for many
25 years and is very concerned and apprehensive about the TIF for this project. He
26 mentioned the $300,000 up front cash payment the City will be required to make; the 9-
27 1/2% TIF note which runs for 18 years. His other concerns related to the Plan which
28 he feels is unclear and the timetable from start to end. He stressed this is not a public
29 improvement and feels the City is in a rush. He added that the TIF should contain a
30 cap. He reiterated that the City has no certainty of what it is getting. He feels the City
31 is getting nothing for this project. He quoted a document by the City Finance Director
32 which said it will be tight getting the $300,000 up front cash and this project should be
33 deferred. Mr. Haik emphasized that flexibility is uncertainty in this case. Mr. Haik put
34 forth many questions about the funding for this project and that the Planning
35 Commission should inform the Council about the risk. He indicated this issue is US
36 Bank's problem and that it ought to be tabled.
•
OR.AF7
Page _ 31
•1 Dou2 Jones 2505 Silver Lane voiced his concerns about storm water runoff. He
2 stated he could see no dollar amount in either plan conerning this issue. He opined that
3 Silver Lake looks extremely murky due to run off from places like Apache. He feels the
4 City should'help with this problem and that one-way would be to'condemn certain .
5 properties for ponding, etc.
6 Gerald Evans, 2916 Silver Lake Court, is in full agreement with Mr. Haik that the
7 Planning Commission should take a strong look at spending this kind of money.
8 Jim McNulty, 2921-33rd Avenue NE, also concurs with Raymond Haik and is worried
9 that with the present staff, the City will have problems in the future.
10 Jim Higgins, 2712 St. Anthony Boulevard, has been waiting 16 plus years for
11 something to happen at Apache. 'He had many questions about uses, tax base, and
12 neighbors. He, too, is'conerned with TIF and does not want taxes to increase if the
13 project fails. Mr. Higgins said the Plan should be "cast in stone" beforehand and wants
14 the Planning Commission to table the project. The Planning Commission, he added, has
15 never been given the flexibility to plan.
16 Chair Bergstrom asked if the Hillcrest representatives would respond to the comments.
0,7 Scott Tankenoff responded to Mr. Otte's concerns by stating that comparing the Stinson
18 project with the Apache project is not an appropriate comparison. He explained that
19 they have done several post-war buildings and Hillcrest has been in business for many
20 years. He added that building components are only as good as the people who put them
21 in - Hillcrest buildings last. Mr..Tankenoff offered that Hillcrest's consultants are
22 available to discuss the Apache project with residents.
23 Referring to the Met Council Livable Communities grant application, Mr. Takenoff
24 stated that that program is not tied in with Apache directly and therefore, Hillcrest has
25 not been waiting for more information on the grant.
26 Chair Bergstrom asked Mr. Soth to respond to the audience comments concerning TIF
27 for this project. Bergstrom pointed out that that issue was not in the Planning
28 Commission's realm, but the Council's, and that the Planning Commission is only
29 considering the preliminary and final plans and rezoning request at this meeting.
30 Mr. Soth explained that Jerry Gilligan of Dorsey & Whitney, is handling the TIF for
31 this project, so he (Mr. Soth)Is not familiar with the specifics. He noted that everybody
32 needs to know that the City is not just handing $4 million in TIF money to the
33 developer. He also commented that statutory requirements state that the Planning
�4 Commission is to consider the Plan and rezoning for this type of project.
Page S 32
1 Mr. Soth said the Plan is definitive and that the developer is committed to the minimum
2 plan but there is no guaranty on the Preferred Plan. Soth responded to Commissioner
.3 Hatch's question on the worst case financial scenario, with a question of his own - if
4 this project does not go forward, what does that mean for the future of the Apache
5 area? Mr. Soth said he was involved with Minneapolis' Block E redevelopment and that
6 project had many of the same issues. As it was with that project, part of the answer is
7 "Is there another project around the corner?".
8 Commissioner Melsha asked about the Preliminary/Final Plan and the PUD. Mr. Soth
9 told him that the Preliminary/Final Plan is what the developer is going to do with the
10 property and the PUD puts it in contract form.
11 Mr. Haik interjected that Apache presently pays $150,000 a year in taxes and stated
12 that the City can do everything with US Bank that it can do with Hillcrest.
13 Commissioner Thomas asked that should Hillcrest begin to use Interim Uses, if that is
14 the time when the developer loses TIF. Mr. Shardlow responded that Interim Uses are
15 not their objective, but the Uses in the Preferred Plan are what they are aiming for. He
16 stated that interim uses are temporary use of the property and it comes down to a
17 judgement call by the City. Hillcrest is committing and defining.
08 Commissioner Hanson asked if the ro osed Plan is more restrictive than the current
P P
19 Plan in use. Mr. Shardlow explained that the proposed Plan is more restrictive to retail
20 and less so to light industrial.
21 An in depth discussion about TIF ensued. Mr. Haik and Commissioner Hanson
22 commented on TIF. Mr. Robert Strachota, Shenehon Company, is the TIF consultant
23 for the developer, explained that the value of the property needs to increase to $10
24 million for the Interim Plan and $20 million for the Preferred Plan; currently the
25 property is valued at $5 million. That value is frozen. The worst case scenario would
26 be that the City would receive the same tax money for the next 3 years as it is now
27 receiving. The $20 million value must be reached before the developer can receive all
28 the TIF money. The $300,000 Is the City's reimbursement (contribution) to the
29 developer for the $1 million the developer is spending for storm water improvements.
30 Mr. Jones indicated Mr. Haik has said the City is giving 50% of the money for this
31 project. Jones wanted to know if this percentage is common. Mr. Tankenoff responded
32 that Hillcrest is making a substantial investment and again offered his consultants to
33 residents with questions about the project.
34 Commissioner Hanson wanted his assumption clarified that in this TIF district, as the
5 value of the property increases, the City would get an increase in tax revenues and a
6 percentage of that would go back to the developer.
DRAFT
• Page 33
1 Mr. Strachota explained that the City's financial consultant, Springsted, Inc. designed
2 the TIF district to provide an incentive to the developer when the highest Plan is
3 achieved. He also assured Mr. Hanson that there is no bond. In response to Hanson's .
4 query, Mr. Strachota said that once the developer hits $4 million, the City will receive
5 the overages.
6 Mr. Haik handed out to the Commissioners a copy of the St. Anthony HRA Limited
7 Revenue Taxable Tax Increment Note for their perusal and said he wanted it to be
8 included in the record.
9 Chair Bergstrom gave a 10 minute recess of the meeting at 9:20 PM.
10 The meeting reconvened at 9:30 PM.
11 Chair Bergstrom reminded the Commissioners that they are to be considering rezoning
12 and the Preliminary and Final Plans and cannot make recommendations relating to TIF,
13 whereupon the public hearing he closed at 9:30 PM.
14 When Hatch inquired about the timetable of the Plan, Bergstrom said those issues will
15. be clarified in the PUD agreement. He noted that the Council referred to the Planning.
�6 Commission uses and facility aesthetics.
17 Commissioner Stille commented that the site has sat in poor condition for a very long
18 time and he supports rezoning the property. He feels there are some issues that he
19 would like to see changed, but is comfortable with the Plan at this point. Bergstrom
20 commented that the City has an option to go forward or back to square one.
21 Commissioner Melsha agreed with Commissioner Stille.
22 Commissioner Thomas felt a better job could have been done concerning public input
23 and noted that all of the residents in the audience were against the project. He explained
24 that he feels the City should wait for the Met Council plan grant to study the northwest
25 quadrant of the City. He feels the City,can accommodate Hillcrest. He is not
26 comfortable with the minimum standards but agrees that Hillcrest has economic
27 incentive to higher standards.
28 Commissioner Tillmann commented that flexibility is not a guaranty and that the City
29 must balance what we want with the realities of business. She feels this is a realistic
30 procedure.
31 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Stille, to recommend approval to the City Council of
�2 the Preliminary and Final Plans that include a rezoning from a Commercial to a
DRAFT
Page .:; 34
61 Planned Unit Development zoning district for the Apache Plaza property based on the
2 following:
3
4 the July 27, 2000 Preliminary and Final Plans
5 • the August 1, 2000 Exhibit A, as modified by John Shardlow
6 • recognizing deferred approvals for the Comprehensive Sign Plan;
7 the Lighting Plan, which must be consistent with City plans; and the
8 redevelopment of the New Market site.
9 Further, the Planning Commission finds that:
10
11 the proposed Plan is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan;
12 • Apache Plaza is an underdeveloped commercial property and has been in this-
13 condition for several years during which time the City has seen no significant
14 interest in redevelopment from developers;
15 • Apache Plaza property represents the most significant underdeveloped asset in
16 the City's non-residential tax base;
�8
7 . • recent adjacent development has failed to rekindle the commercial
redevelopment of the Apache Plaza property;
19 • the project developer, Hillcrest Development, has demonstrated a successful
20 history of similar redevelopment in nearby areas;
21 • there are no detrimental impacts to nearby properties;
22 • the proposed project will be of significance to the City through its planned
23 improvements to the building exterior, interior, landscaping, storm water quality
24 treatment, and through general revitalization of a long underused property; and
25 • the proposed project represents reasonable and viable high and low use of the
26 property and that City abandonment of the proposed plan at this time would
27 send a negative message to other potential developers.
28 A few additional questions and`comments were made:
29
30 Hanson asked if we change zoning now, will that zoning be forever. Bergstrom
31 answered yes, unless the proposed project failed. At that point, the zoning would
32 return to what it is now. Hanson also wondered if residential for that site is ruled out.
43 Bergstrom responded it is ruled out for the Apache building itself. Stille said he is still
4 hopeful that the mixed uses would include residential.
Page 1 35
01 Hanson inquired if the Hillcrest project failed, would a new developer be required to go
2 through the same process. Shardlow said the zoning probably would not happen
3 because it would not take place without a developer's agreement..
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5 Chair Bergstrom thanked each speaker and those present. He reminded everyone
6 present that this matter will be discussed at the Council's August 8 Work Session and
7 will be on the Council's August 22, 2000 regular meeting agenda.
8 IX. COMMISSION INPUT.
9 Melsha will attend the August 8, 2000 Council Work Session. Bergstrom will attend-the
10 August 22, 2000 Regular Council meeting.
11 Tillmann reminded the Commissioners about VillageFest and the August 5 parade.
12 Bergstrom asked for volunteers to staff the NSP booth for that event from
13 approximately noon to 3 or 4 pm.
14 Bergstrom requested Isom get further information relating to decorative lighting and
15 its costs from NSP.
06 Thomas said he is planning to attend a meeting next Thursday regarding the Livable
17 Communities grant application-He added that Commissioner Tillmann and he would
18 attend the public form on decorative lighting to be held on Wednesday, August 9.
19 Thomas indicated the Upper Midwest Planners Association has scheduled a training
20 conference in Duluth in September where overcoming community opposition on
21 affordable housing will be a topic of discussion. He stated he has information if anyone
22 is interested.
23 Chair Bergstrom noted that this meeting was being videotaped. He said the time might
24 be right to push for Planning Commission meetings to be televised. He asked if there is
25 a cost and Isom responded there is a cost for someone to do the videotaping.
26 Bergstrom thanked the Commission, staff, and consultants for all the work during the
27 last few months on the Hillcrest project.
28 X. ADJOURNMENT.
29 Motion by Tillman, second by Melsha to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 pm.
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31 Respectfully,
182 Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk
36
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY _
PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN under the Minnesota Statutes, that the Planning Commission will hold a regular
meeting on Tuesday, August 1, 2000 at 7.00 pm at the City Council Chambers, 3301 Silver Lake Road, Saint
Anthony,Minnesota.
NOTE: The Planning Commission has received the staff report and recommendation, plus supporting
documentation from the applicant, through staff for this agenda.` This information was distributed prior
to the meeting date. Individual Commissioners and staff have visited the site prior to this meeting.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
Please notify the Chairman prior to the beginning of any meeting of your desire to speak before the
Commission. Your remarks will be limited to five minutes.
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PUBLIC HEARING. Hillcrest Development's preliminary and final development plan
for the _Apache Plaza that includes a rezoning from "C" district to a Planned Unit
Development (PUD). Action required.
IX. COMMISSION INPUT
1. Chair to select a Commissioner as the representative to the upcoming August 8, 2000 Council
Meeting.
2. Commissioner's comments.
X. ADJOURNMENT
•
38
LAW OFFICES
SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER, P.A.
1300 WASHINGTON SOUARE
J051AH E. BRILL,JR. 100 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MICHELLE R. KLEGON
JAMES R. GREUPNER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 JAMES A.YAROSH
GERALD S. DUFFY STEVEN WEINTRAUT
WOOD.R. FOSTER. JR. TELEPHONE (612)339-7131' - TROY J. SEIBERT -
- THOMAS H. GOODMAN _ ROBERT F. RODE
JOHN S.WATSON FACSIMILE (612)339.6591 BRENNA E. NELSON
WM. CHRISTOPHER PENWELL
SUSAN M.VOIGT
ANTHONY J. GLEEKEL
JOEL H. JENSEN '525 EAST WELLS STREET.SUITE 250
SHERRI L. ROHLF Writer's E-Mail Address: TonyGleekel @sbgdfcom MILWAUKEE.WISCONSIN 53202-3965
JORDAN M. LEWIS
14141 225.9646
BRIAN E.WEISBERG FAX 1414)276-6255
July 27, 2000
Mr. Spencer Isom HAND DELIVERED
Assistant City Manager
Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony,MN 55418-1699
Re: Hillcrest Development, a Minnesota limited partnership("Hillcrest')
Petition for Planned Unit Development for Property known as Apache Plaza, legally
described as Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Silver Lake Center, and Lot 5, Block 1, Apache Plaza,
Ramsey County,Minnesota("Property")
Our File No. 21,256-AG-003
Dear Spencer:
Enclosed please find twenty (20) copies of Hillcrest's Application for Preliminary Development
Plan and Final Development Plan Approval. Twelve (12) of the copies contain colored exhibits
and eight (8) contain black and white exhibits. The Application includes certain changes that were
discussed at today's Development Review Committee meeting.
As was further discussed at the Development Review Committee meeting, I withheld including
Exhibit A (Uses). As I advised you, I will review with Hillcrest revising Exhibit A based on: (i)
today's discussions; (ii) proposed language you provided from the Dublin, Ohio zoning ordinance;
(iii) review of John Shardlow's memorandum; and (iv) review of the C-1 uses in the existing
Zoning Ordinance.
I will attempt to reduce the exhibit to a description of uses, eliminating the list of uses. I will
prepare the exhibit and disseminate it to my client for discussion. My hope is that my client
approves the exhibit by Monday. At that time I will forward the exhibit to you,Bill Soth, and John
Shardlow to be presented to the Planning Commission on Tuesday evening.
39
Mr. Spencer Isom
July 27,2000
Page 2
If you have any in questions, please contact me. Otherwise, I look forward to talking to
you on Monday and seeing you Tuesday evening.
Very truly yours,
Anthony . Gleekel
AJG:lar
Enclosures
cc: Bill Soth(via mail w/narrative and w/o exhibits)
John Shardlow(via mail w/narrative and w/o exhibits)
Hoff Heiberg(via mail w/narrative and w/o exhibits)
Scott Tankenoff(hand delivered w/exhibits)
•
57
• EXHIBIT A
PERMITTED USES
The Applicant intends to redevelop the subject property as Silver Lake Centre, a high tech office
campus. All of the uses and activities conducted on the subject property shall be consistent with
the high tech office campus setting and several of the Applicant's other projects including the
baseline projects identified in the PUD narrative. Integral to the project is the ability to modify
internal space within the Centre to accommodate a diversity of business types, with varying
spatial and operational requirements.
It is understood that the specific nature of the businesses that will occupy Silver Lake Centre
over time can not be reduced to an inclusive list. The uses of the Centre will generally include:
(i) administrative and executive offices for personnel engaged in general administrative,
supervisory, purchasing, accounting and other functions related to general office-,_.high
technology office, printing and medical businesses; (ii) research, training,'synthesis, and analysis
facilities and testing laboratories; (iii) restaurants; and (iv) retail and banking facilities intended
to support primarily the tenants and customers within.this development.'
The Centre will include all necessary loading docks and external equipment as set forth in the
PUD narrative.
Accessory Use
Warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, fabrication, light manufacturing, assembly, processing
and similar uses that are incident to, or support to the permitted uses listed above.
Interim Uses
Warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, fabrication, light manufacturing, assembly, processing
and similar uses, and those retail uses listed in Section 1635.02 of the City Code (not to exceed
40,000 square feet in addition to Herbergers) that are not incident or accessory to the permitted
uses described above, shall be allowed as interim uses for ten (10) years after the date of
adoption of this ordinance. If any of these uses remain after this period, and the Applicant has
completed all of its obligations regarding all landscaping, exterior improvements, drainage
improvements and signage as required under the Minimum Plan as set out in the PUD narrative,
these uses shall become permitted uses within the Silver Lake Centre development.
None of these businesses or activities will cause the exterior image or character of the Centre to
be down graded, or have any adverse effects on the surrounding neighborhood. The Centre will
include all necessary loading areas and mechanical equipment, as regulated by the PUD.
Finally, it is understood that the existing Herbergers store may stay in place for a period of eight
• (8)years, until the expiration of the existing lease.
49-tar-8/3100-21236-003-Exhibit A to PUD Supp 8-3
49
• The final tenant mix will produce no great external impacts, including
outdoor storage (unless allowed in a commercial zoning district under the
Zoning Ordinance). All uses will be contained within the Building with
any external impacts (i.e., outdoor storage, loading docks, etc.), meeting or
exceeding standards of the Zoning Ordinance.
While the Applicant desires and intends to pursue the Preferred Plan, the
Applicant needs maximum flexibility (through the terms of the PUD Agreement)
to succeed. The need for "flexibility" has been often discussed by the Applicant.
It generally means that the Applicant cannot be required to come back before the
Planning Commission and/or City Council for discretionary approvals. To do so
will prevent the Applicant from marketing the project and representing to tenants
that only building permits are required to proceed with a particular space.
The particular tenants will drive the phasing of the internal and external
improvements (e.g., landscaping, signage, etc.). The Applicant: (i) does not
intend on commencing external improvements, weather conditions permitting,
until after a lease or leases are signed; (ii) all of the existing retailers, except
Herbergers, will need to immediately vacate Apache Plaza; (iii) Herbergers may
or may not vacate its space in the near future; and (iv) within 60 to 90 days of
closing on the purchase of the subject property, the Applicant intends to
commence the construction of two (2) show Office show spaces of approximately
a total of 4,000 square feet to demonstrate to perspective tenants the quality of the
• project (the Preferred Plan).
Any new construction on the Apache Plaza Property will require approvals
pursuant to the requirements of the PUD Ordinance.
ii. Baseline Comparison Proiects
It is the Applicant's intention to approach the redevelopment of Apache Plaza of
the New Market Property like its other projects, many of which have been
inspected by City officials. Similar finishes, specifications and standards will be
used on this project, depending on the tenant mix.
The Applicant has projects comparable in finish and specifications and
performance standards that compare to either the Preferred Plan or the Fallback
Plan. Those baseline projects are as follows:
a. Preferred Plan — Mappcor facility at 1125 Energy Park Drive, St.
Paul, Minnesota("Preferred Plan Baseline");
b. Fallback Plan — 2001 Kennedy St. NE/2000 Sumner Street NE
("Fallback Plan Baseline")
5
8S E.SEVENTH PLACE,SUITE 100
SAINT PAUL,MN SS101-2887
6S1-223-3000 FAX:6SI-223-3002 SPRINGSTED
• Public Finance Advisors
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager; Mayor and City Council - St. Anthony Village
FROM: Paul T. Steinman, Vice President/Client Representative
CC: j Robert Thistle, Senior Vice President
DATE: July 28, 2000
SUBJECT: Apache Redevelopment
The purpose of this memo is to discuss the public comments provided at the meeting on July 25, 2000, to
answer a number of points made by Mr. Raymond Haik in his memo dated August 1, 2000, and to
summarize Springsteds' recommendations with regard to the Hillcrest redevelopment proposal.
The public comments at the meeting on the 25" and the letter by Mr. Haik likely created additional questions
about this project. Unfortunately the comments and letter make few accurate representations about the
project, although this public input is welcomed and encouraged.
What follows is my response to several points raised during the public hearing:
• Neither the City nor HRA are issuing bonds for this project.
• The only up-front payment made will be the $300,000 provided by the HRA toward storm water
improvements, and the funds will not be released until all the storm water improvements (at a
potential total cost of$1 million) are completed to the satisfaction of the City.
• The pay-as-you-go note to be issued to the developer is NOT a general obligation. of the city,
thereby eliminating most of the financial risk associated with the project.
• The current basic structure of the project is as follows:
♦ Provide pay-as-you-go tax increment to the developer in the amount of approximately $4 million
(9.5% present value) or approximately$10 million gross.
♦ Provide additional pay-as-you-go tax increment to the developer, up to $750,000, for storm water
improvements to cover the difference between the total cost and the amount the HRA pays up
front.
' ♦
--Decertify the District at the end of year 2018.
• • The pay-as-you-go note is detailed as follows:
SAINT PAUL.MN • MINNEAPOLIS,MN • MILWAUKEE.WI • OVERLAND PARK,KS WASHINGTON,DC • DES MOINES,IA
97
City of Saint Anthony
July 28, 2000
Page 2
• ♦ The.pay-as-you-go note will be paid by the City on an annual basis starting in 2002 through_
2018 with interest at the rate of 9.5%.
♦ The pay-as-you-go note is paid from additional taxes (tax increment) generated on the
Apache site as a result of improvements the developer makes.
o If the developer doesn't make the expected improvements which will in turn increase the
value of the mall, then, due to his own shortcomings, tax increment will not be generated in
an amount sufficient to repay the developer the total amount of the note. The City or HRA
has NO obligation to make up any such shortfall from alternative sources.
♦ Similarly, if the developer decides NOT to pay the property taxes owed on the mall in a given
year, then there wouldn't be any tax increment available to make a payment to the developer
on the note, and again the City or HRA would have no obligation to make up the shortfall
from alternative sources.
There is little, if any, financial risk to the City and taxpayers in this project.
• The City is not"bailing out" US Bank on this protect: .
♦ The developer began negotiation on the purchase of the property prior to knowing whether
the City was interested in providing tax increment to the project.
♦ US Bank was not originally motivated to discuss the sale of the property.
♦ The developer is proposing to pay for the value of the land only, recognizing that the building
itself, in its current state, is of little or no value.
• The City does not bear the financial risk associated with the condemnation proceeding.
♦ The developer will pay all costs, including legal fees, associated with the condemnation,
should it proceed.
♦ The Council should be aware, however, that if the condemnation process is exceedingly
more expensive than originally anticipated, it might have a direct impact on the project.
➢ If condemnation costs more than projected, the developer may attempt to adjust other
budget items in the project to make total costs don't exceed the budget. However,
most if not all of the original budget will likely have already been spent long.before the
final cost of condemnation has been determined.
Regardless of the lack of financial risk, there are a couple other risks associated with this project identified
in the following scenarios:
• Scenario A: An agreement is made with the City and the purchase of the site is completed,.then the
developer does absolutely nothing. (Chance of this happening is minimal —Why would the developer
spend $3 million to purchase the site to simply hold it?)
Result of Scenario A: Still no financial risk to the City, but the outcome would certainly be
disappointing.
Scenario B: Developer purchases site, completes the $1 million storm water improvements,
receives $300,000 from the HRA, and then does absolutely nothing additional to the property.
Result of Scenario B: The City will have received $1 million worth of storm water improvements at a
total cost to the City of $300,000.
City of Saint Anthony 98
July 28, 2000
Page 3
• There also are some risks associated with NOT doing this project, the primary one being that the building
may remain in its current state for quite some time prior to redevelopment. It is important to note the
likelihood that ANY redevelopment proposal for this site, given current economic conditions, will require the
use of tax increment financing. This is an assumption that Mr. Haik opposes,in his memo dated August 1;
2000.
Other issues to consider:
• What are the lost opportunity costs associated with waiting for redevelopment to occur?
• Does the mall, in its current state, have a negative affect on property values in the surrounding
area?
• Is there a higher and better use for the property than what is being proposed by Hillcrest?
• Is the City willing to step in as developer on this project?
♦ Purchase the site?
♦ Deal with the"Herbergers" issue?
♦ Demolition?
♦ Market the site?
The following is a response to questions about the TIF District term of 18 years (16 years of increment) and
about how the project has been negotiated to this point:
• Negotiations were initiated with the developer based upon discussion and direction from Mike
Mornson and the Council that the City wanted to "do this deal". The objective from the start was to
achieve the highest value of improvements for the least amount of public dollars.
Initially, based upon an internal rate of return analysis, it was recommended to provide 10 years of
increment from a District that would decertify in 2012. After this was presented to the Council for
consensus and in turn proposed to the developer, it became apparent that 10 years of increment
was not enough to keep them interested in the deal — We believe they would have walked away
from the negotiating table. Based upon the fact that the Council still wanted to do this deal, an
alternative was negotiated that seemed acceptable to all parties involved - 15 years of increment.
An additional year of increment for a total of 16 years was later.discussed as a method of solving the
storm water issue. This project structure, 16 years of increment, was presented to the Council in a
memo dated June 7, 2000, and general consensus was reached in support of this structure.
As a result of Springsteds' ongoing analysis and negotiation, we support that 16 .years is the
minimum amount of increment it will take to induce the Hillcrest proposal.
Additionally, it appeared from early Council discussions that the land use proposed by Hillcrest was
generally acceptable and that a process had been started to address rezoning issues. It is our
understanding.that the Planning Commission and Council are planning to change the current land use
designation and zoning to allow a variety of uses in the building. We proceeded with our negotiations based
upon the understanding these land use and rezoning issues were moving forward in conjunction with our
financial analysis of the project. Springsted's recommendations do not necessarily represent a position on
• the proposed land use as we were not directly involved in those discussions.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact either Bob Thistle or myself.
(� I 88
Zoning Regulations Section
V ,
� Z g �
PUD Process
Applicant Prepares a final.subdivision .
plat for Council approval.(I)(8)
Applicant files approved subdivision
j plat with County Recorder (J)
Building permits may be issued to
applicant
( 80 Code, § 1181.07) (O ,rd. 14-73 passed 3-5-73; Am. Ord. 17-84, passed 6-4-84; Am. Ord. 34-85,
�
passed 8-5-85; Am. Ord. 89-89, passed 11-6-89)
Editor's Note:
j A copy of the most recent ordinance establishing current city fees and service charges is available
t at city offices during normal business hours.
§ 153.057 PLANNED OFFICE, LABORATORY AND RESEARCH DISTRICT.
(A) Purpose. The purpose of the Planned Office, Laboratory and Research District is to.encourage
the coordination and integration of individually designed laboratory and research uses and suburban.
office uses into one planned district.The entire design is intended to utilize a wider range of uses which
are compatible in terms of activity, parking needs, traffic accessibility, sign systems and space
requirements into an office park setting.
(B) General provisions. The owner or owners of a tract of land may request that the zoning district
map be amended to include such tracts in the Planned Office, Laboratory and Research District in
accordance with the provisions of §§ 153..002, 153.230, 153.233 and 153.234. Subsequent to the
.� amendment of the zoning district map and prior to any development within the District,a comprehensive
development plan must be reviewed and approved by the municipality and each request for zoning
clearance must be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission before issuance.
ii
(C) Permitted uses. The following uses shall be permitted.uses in the Planned Office, Laboratory
and Research District.
(1) Administrative and executive offices for personnel engaged in general administrative,
supervisory, purchasing,accounting and other functions related to office operations,research,synthesis,
analysis, development and testing laboratories, including the fabrication, assembly, mixing and
preparation of equipment and components incident or convenient or necessary to the conduct of such
activities and facilities for training personnel.
(2) Uses normally attendant to and in support of servicing of office, administrative,executive,
training,servicing,research and laboratory facilities and related functions,including supply storage and
private meal and lodging facilities for personnel engaged in the training facility.
1996 S-1 Repl.
IJ rr w_rr as raa/ar air rarr M O/A.—-14—li
_w�we Cw�e ti��•�I�I�.� fs � -
leA r/!tar raffia w raffia•�r w_� r•i Lv � �✓ / / � f�\ \
y sw.r rte..r rr..�..,...•..an r>; .�..�.oaa �.a.� _• .:�. 1 / � \ _ �\ ! I
y awe rwa wr..ataLS L.—AL"
IS I-
Ili ,l \ 1 I
/! r
... -Aar
�w•..rw•.w wrr_rA�ar+wrrr•.••wwa � .v v •-�I � `+' I
w.�r r w rrra.raver.r•rT+r-.+w•w Warr I ,•'y'• j I 1!r i - ,
�• w.r w r rr w...w r.r•r_•raaw.a��. �) + I!• I t-rF��_ I -- .�
C w.�w�.w r•.rwr.= •_ _ ; I I I rte- I
w.�w r•�aa w.aL w/awra cr.r rr. :• .' {{ ;I r .11 ` I
•we s w.w.r.r w...r r.. ..w.r.-r-w_r C� I� �� ' �... _ �
�■ .r•raw wr....c_r r rwa....raw.r•.a�..... C) N •I i -
•� rf II �1 r b CRAPRIC iC•tl%
N r•a rwr.r wrr w•_..r raa.a+a.r w r _
Tyr .s rain-�w ww.r r w.wr rrrr ..�r I 11 r�' �• �: i/ � r
�+a•aa w_w�.r�r�a an rrrr•.ar••.r r i I � -...... - .
w=ar.a r raw..•raaa wr .w.��_raa.�.�. ''�, -r ,__. _ �
w r JaOl ��e•ter r wry.C��i/w.Yr C/ � I G L•� .; — ;• - ..—- ..
I 1
a...�� —..rw w..tl....r�•" C: /i i'. I I I L 1 I i i,'/'/:i��/� // \ I i + -
4 �+.w.ra•a w rrr r.r�r.r Elver ara�w_rwrar.ear �� it ff I�. I \1 ' -�r� �. � � � i � � �1 1\ r.mrm.wr 9 ne+•_•os
....a r•,�r...�rr�a r w a..�u.a.+.n a1a w .r �� I �• -- LLTf /7S8 ti'• II i��I ► ..s....n.L g •.r w.r
ra...� I' \�\ S I' C A.
_
j a.Kaa _wre rasr
Li•araa a•w s w�r�•aaw�r r r.n raer w or.wr �� i1�j���j/�j///// `~I I �. � � .•• � -ZI i• �.�� '. � e +re war 9 a..Ls s
11 ti.w.r r rr rw rrr�r w O•ra�:a r•Ia.eve raw.A� - i i ' ./ (t'
Lft. -_r-war w A G►r ft raa•rr+,a 6.•A w�r rr O r II•/� aarm
•aarllt '` ty a1e.r ryI -� y
.a, +.r..w w.�.�.L.�rr riawrr�..+arnac...r'_""� _ - I f I. `� ` ��� •/ - Y a aaeae.e.e
sr. L�wra.•ra a rw w orwr �• \ �*.� II� / � ., i l6. ^'w••may `•"f�• -��'� r � Lrr..wwr -� •re•vre
�.••..�-r•/w Lw�•ar.r.a.rr r wa..r.r ztsa V_J � 7 1 [,_/'/ --•_+••• _I 7 ..o ra. --� w.•iw.e.arr
•1 ' '' I /// %j%%� .I II!\--�! � t �� GsaaT are f�a
frw rrrr w/w rrrr rnara rr�n.tMr s over r ^� '..2 I I I. i '. �� i/'
�ag1a ` y, r
C——1 r 1—n. rlaf w ow..wr s :� / /// I . �LaaC r f / (n H
_aaiTa vim., I r I- _ ,.(•! ���y%j I,.N arv� •-r. � � I �\ F I V1 -r- -o-sr e.u..r.as
Sra arrr fw.aw��we wraar w w•w I+ea C yw-N ! \ 1\'Jam_- (•,1.�1- 1 r' ,'l'. 1 � •!IR�K I
•rr+...a.r.ww.rw►r st••rawa rawa«oars r / / / S` i 1 . \
rr+w n. ..J: 1/ i I: •�. :lac L�II-� .'%� j�.r•w i1
re.r. / --I vi Z•%"-
I>7 tea••.arw n r.ri rr rar w...ear r R •ww►_ia• / I I. i 7:lq` La/ ��• I 1 -j I+L I .- __-_-1 J Cb.
.rr•r r•.•r r t 3.r.r_r.rtira>•.r rawer w i/, !', I /'i / !I✓ / .��/t ..• ! t 1 :�. ,�•I I
var[ ,wr�a+wrwar w o. rr•eta.re Ooarawr ar Ja7t{t //• L I ....• •- i .• �.a�-49-I i
w ar.Err a sr o...,- aaLaa araw L.4 ww.w�aY I I t•/,' /,/, �f'/// ///i � -• I' r A r! L ' I iiL C"r �•\•'!I
rA �.•._rrt n r.a.a waaa�a w+rae
•aarr w Tarr.r,req+w
G
• Ls:,r w w...r usLr w�� r �w 39TH 'L.V�1C/E 1'r cXIS�NG 2(,ILDING \ \ I r! i t 1 1
wraa.w•Uaa�a rr.r�a C.ww. rw•ri.nr L. /"/.. ■ I ,i. I ji
w•...r a...ar r r...r...a a...w•ww war r.it+...Tww. ' �. / aaw..a-•�.+ii w rar / r10Xm: �� ' '1 I' `-r-e-F ltf r :1..a , la(i!;
.rw«.w war..w rr.w.r•ti,rgns w LaerJa � �� - ' L {(({ L.�,j. � : _ j3I +
� •� __ ti/}.�. J_!as / :•'1.�j /�/� 'r-^ � ' _ I \ Gas1. 'I I' ftt i�tl r.•, + il_i�/++L 1 r I
`''I'P--I4I4(/j j���I S � .J �r•.�.� w ' �' e�L�_� v�/� J
I iW _ /i:' ,�•� ��� .,�.. � � . i� It /j �,'.' /i III :`i�� � w_�.w �._�1,=�'....r..,.�el`.:y
411 /�/ /.:. ti •• -nn ..tt=•
1C� I j PLC. \ ?ate. I�%/ .:..v�i:� � .'.-��� �.�;11' '/■. � i�(t\r 1°,�'..�.,�j,1,1,,2,1 j �M�°=�
L'vL:'::,.l1 .+v✓:.w.. I� �e/C. 1 �I '/. -,r ..r` , ^_ %.:' 1 IT• f .l 1I�i �g i IailU
..,.� :I. I aaw!' � .. aaaraa�arr i —..r. ,' '��j j .I t.r t_• L J-t .�• ..�..„ `r. •,,i%�' .it (- I .rem
_x.m 'Lff
\. % sae i;Y'�� ::'ii�Jcil�.rli .:I i !• �I e i
j, \ I I f!/ %i.• ,i j l I �►'t, ! 1 _ i
asu
I7
,! Ls".�.\.. //���
case Hats j r «-
i1 V�UE,'e t• _ \ '` j'(- �1, '' - r b C > :. :ri,•a"_.�
N.E
.r � .. I .a 1. �'. . I.. f' �. {{���' �•5'� t=._ � ��_:�.' Ire ---• �
."4.�.' ..... �Ji/a.t/. � i� �� ! I. _ I I i :L• `�� 'f t•• j � 't 1 . o ~ %+.�.a•--�..,�� .
/ 1 g
\� - i yV••- ,r -.• rl .. e i i i \ `r`•� ?d• \ '' �QF��fi• / X. ��6, IIt� '•� 31Q 'a
v 'L• _.�L..'� L• '�..• �.��^� \ r 1 :1(1 ••�:. :f.: _ .,I \_ i I '� I t i V1
/ �,rARrE 3ArfXOAl7
`� ��:��a•1L�n� — — -- J AdINNEAPOUS do 5AUL T
Jl
Via,,,. '�' _ _ —.,." -•.. . ,r.r.�1
>! 14M�rif�tli ate. eve •rrra �
�._.... I,�e I
...._.rte I. - FrdIc=at Deve±o=ent A�7aC�1 1 ,V SCd Surver I
__ 1 .---- I _._� -�
99
-CITY '. �'OF ,
i
I
ST . ANTHONY
I
FIRST DRAFT
I
2001
PROPOSED BUDGET '
100
July 31, 2000
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of St. Anthony, Minnesota
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: .
Throughout this document, bold face typing represents goals that were established at
the March 2000 goal setting retreat.
Management Letter
To better provide the City Council with information in its role as policy makers', the
budget process was enhanced in 2001 to include additional narrative information, a
restructuring of the budget calendar, as well as utilizing line item budgeting
techniques. This is the second year of restructuring the format, which primarily has
moved the budget process up six months to start in April instead of October. Our hope
is that this new format will continue to improve the quality of the information and
provide to the City Council and St. Anthony residents a better understanding of
City operations.
• This document includes the year 2001 proposed_budgets for the General Fund, the 5-
Year Capital Equipment Plan, the Recycling Fund, the Dare Fund, the H.R.A. Fund,
the Park Improvement Fund, the Road Improvement Fund, the Community Service
Fund, the Utility Fund and Liquor Operations.
Also, included are the goals that were set by the City Staff and Council in March of
2000. In addition, a proposed policy document (Financial Management Plan) has
been developed and distributed to Council for their review, comments and adoption.
In preparing the 2001 Budget, the objective was to maintain or improve the existing
level of City services and programs with the use of financially conservative budgeting.
Most budgets reflect a decrease from last years budgeted amount to reflect a budget,
which is based on actual expenditures versus the previous year's budget. The entire
City staff has worked diligently in putting together this budget to ensure that the
services desired by the community are provided at an affordable cost.
General Operating Fund
For year 2001, staff is proposing a General Operating Budget in the amount of
$3,519,875, which represents a 0.21% decrease in last year's budget of$3,527,875.
On the average, most budgets were downsized to remove the $250,000 contingency
• transfers as a revenue line item. If these transfers were included in the 2001 Budget,
expenditures would have increased 6.9%.
- 2
101 ,
Budgets that increased are the Public/Intergovernmental Relations Budget, the City
Buildings Budget, the Fire Protection Budget, the Budget for Inspections and the Parks
Budget.
The Public/Intergovernmental Relations Budget increased 11.75% to better reflect the
actual costs for dues to the League of Minnesota Cites and the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities. In addition, the planned expansion of the newsletter to
provide improved communications about St. Anthony's important issues is reflected
in the proposed expenditures of this budget
The City Buildings Budget is up 5.67%, which is due to anticipated increases in utility
costs and building maintenance. The use of the Community Center has been greater
than anticipated. To support the growth in utilization and the increased costs of
operation created by this additional use, the rent transfer was increased.
The Fire Protection Budget reflects a 6.81% increase. This budget has been
restructured by the new Fire Chief to include new and innovative firefighter safety
training and programs.
The Inspections_Budget has been revised up 5.28% to reflect,the actual costs of our,
consultant, Greg Schmidt. 'Our building'official is compensated on a fee basis that is
associated with a portion of all building, heating and plumbing permits. This Budget is
exclusively funded by offsetting revenues and does not reflect an increase in the levy or
costs to the residents.
The addition of Water-tower Park, the improvements made to Silver Point Park and a
growing need for renovation of Central Park has placed additional demands on Public
Works. To service this demand, the Parks budget has been increased 28.48% to reflect
the hiring of an additional full-time employee.
Overall, the personal services portion of the Budget continues to be the largest portion
of the General Fund Operating Budget. This year the proposed Budget includes a 3%
increase in salary costs, as well as a $25.00,per month increase to the City's health
insurance contribution for family coverage.
The negotiation of union contracts for Police, Fire and Public Works employees was
completed last year and will be in place until December 31, 2001. Throughout the
entire budget, most costs associated with maintaining our current level of service
and programs were downsized to better reflect a budget that is closer to actual
expenditures.
•
3
102
Infrastructure Improvements
During the past few years, in support of past residential and community wishes, there
has been significant reconstruction of.City streets and park infrastructures. As.part of
the annual road improvement project and increased need for park usage, this activity
will likely continue over the next 5 - 10 years.
One of the goals the City Council established in March of 2000 was to provide 100-
year flood protection for all residents and businesses. The 2001,2002 and 2003
Road Improvement Projects all provide additional benefit to the 100-year flood
protection project
Next year's project is scheduled for West Armour Terrace and 30`h Avenue NE.
Funding for road improvements continues to be at 35% being assessed to the property
owners and 65% levied over the entire community for their use of City streets.
Projects to be completed in 2000 include: the Silver Lake Road Bridge Project (from
37' Avenue to Silver Lane), the Signal Light at 37d' and Highcrest, the 29" Avenue
Street Project and the 33rd Avenue MSA Road Project. Final completion of these
projects and payment for the services will be completed in 2001.
The planning and design of the Public Works facility is on going and will continue in
2001. The building of a new facility is contingent upon available funding, which has
yet to be determined. SEH will be conducting a building needs assessment in 2000 to
determine the cost of repairing or replacing all City buildings.
Providing a Park System that offers a mix of recreational opportunities for
residents of all ages will continue the focus of the Parks Commission. Many Changes
and renovations to Silver Point Park, the newly created Water Tower Park, Central
Park and Emerald Park are being discussed and reviewed.
Levy Limits
This year, the State removed the levy limit restriction on Cities that had been in place
for three years. The 2001 levy totals $1,763,475, which represents a 7.07%
increase compared to last years levy of$1,646,970. The removal of the levy limits
should not be interpreted as an indicator that this year's levy was increased to offset
previous years' constraints.
The proposed increase in the levy includes an inflationary increase over last year's
actual expenditures; a permanent line item for VillageFest; reduction in the Clinton
Cops Grant revenue; new and innovative Fire Protection programs; the establishment of
• Budget Reserves as a line item and an additional full-time Park's employee.
4 1®3
® In addition to the levy, there are other several other factors that could increase the
City's tax rate including: LGA and HACA amounts, Fiscal Disparities and St.
Anthony's total tax capacity being lowered by changes to the Class Rates.
It is a challenge to prepare a budget within a system that does not allow the City to
control all the elements that.contribute to a tax increase, however the position of the
City remains to keep taxes at moderate levels while providing services and programs
desired by the public.
Because of our sound financial condition (Moody's A-1 rating) and by setting aside
budget reserves, we have been able to operate within State imposed changes, levy
limits, and compression of the tax rates.
State Tax Reform and Tax Capacity
Tax.capacity is the basis on which taxes are assessed. The net effect of the 1997 law
put in place by the State Legislature was to reduce the overall tax capacity (tax base) of
the City.
The tax rate is determined by dividing the amount of taxes levied by the City's or
taxing authority's tax capacity. By.reducing the City's tax capacity, the new.law
virtually guaranteed an increase.in the City's tax rate even without any changes.in City
spending.
In addition, the new law has shifted some of the burden of paying taxes from
commercial and industrial taxpayers to residential properties. For collectible year 2001
taxes, this trend will continue, however it should not be as dramatic as in other years.
Since St. Anthony is a fully developed community with a tax base that is comprised of
70% residential, 15% commercial, 12% apartments and 3% other, it becomes critical
to monitor and react to the impact of any changes to the class rates. Our continued
focus on redevelopment assures that our image and tax base stays firm.
100-Year Flood Protection - City Goal
Watershed management has been an on-going concern for the community for many
years. The entire City is served by the Metropolitan Wastewater System and with the
development of the community the demands for wastewater have changed dramatically.
During periods of heavy rainfall or the spring thaw, portions of St. Anthony have
incurred or are at risk to incur flooding problems. The redevelopment of these areas to
provide 100-year flood protection for the Community, (such as Silver Point Park,
• road improvements and holding ponds) will continue to be important issues over the
next several years.
5 104
Funding for this project (estimated to cost $10 million dollars) will come from various
• sources such as grants, road improvement bonds, storm sewer bonds, storm water fees
and reserves. In 1999, the City secured a $1.8 million dollar grant from the DNR
and an additional $2 million in 2000.
The Harding Street Holding Pond Project is in the development stage and we anticipate
it to be underway by 2001.
Capital Equipment Purchases
The Capital Equipment Budget for year 2001 totals $503,400. Funding for these
expenditures will come from various sources including: the annual General Fund
Transfer, Lauderdale/Falcon Heights contract revenues, interest earnings, trade/sale of
existing equipment and 1999 and 2000 liquor profits.
The Police Department has requested that 3 squads and related equipment be replaced,
upgrading their State computer system and a S&W computer identification kit and Pro
Copper seats.
Fire has requested that all turnout gear be replaced to comply with existing safety
regulations, the purchase of a self-contained breathing apparatus, replacement of the
• defibrillators, and the rebuilding of Engine #21.
Finance/Administration's capital equipment costs are associated with the upkeep and
maintenance of the City computer network.
Public Works has requested a slope mower to efficiently mow the various holding
ponds in the City. Without this type of mower, these areas are difficult, time
consuming and cumbersome to mow. In addition, they are in need of a leaf vacuum
and two trucks are in need of replacement.
A review of year 2001 Capital Equipment revenues and expenditures are as follows:
Revenues
General Fund Transfer $ 75,000
Police Contracts $ 54,800
W/S Transfer $ 12,900
Interest Earnings $ 1,000
Trade/Sale of Existing Equipment $ 7,500
Capital Equipment Fund Balance $ 170,975
1999 Liquor Profits $ 90,225
2000 Liquor Profits 91,000
Total $503,400
6 105
• Expenditures ($503.400)
Police:
Squad cars $ 67,500..
Tear down & build new squads $ 4,500
Equipment Replacement/squads $ 5,400
Upgrade State Computer System $ 15,000
S&W Computer Identification Kit $ 3,200
Pro Copper Seats 1,000
Total $ 96,600
Fire:
Turnout Gear $ 39,600
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus $ 53,700
Replace Defibrillator $ 5,000
Rebuild Engine #21 73,000
Total $171,300
Finance/Administration:
Replace Personal Computers (5) $ 12,500
PC Software Upgrades $ 3,000
Replace Epson Lazer Printer- $ 4,000
Upgrade - Windows 198 $ .4,000
Misc. Network Upgrades 3,000
Total $ 26,500
Public Works:
Toro Groundmaster/Slope Mower $ 40,000
Toro Leaf Vacuum $ 3,000
Crew Cab Truck $ 25,000
3/ Ton Pick-up Truck 25,000
Total $ 93,000
Parks:
Refurbish Park Equipment $ -25,000
Total $ 25,000
Liquor:
H.V.A.C. (Stonehouse & SAV 1) $ 60,000
Backlight/Canopy (Stonehouse) $ 10,000
Security Camera's (All Stores) $ 15,000
Retail Sales Counter (SAV I) 6,000
• Total $ 91,000
7 106
* Profits from 2000 liquor operations will fund these expenditures. It should be
distinguished that the capital outlay expenditures for the Stonehouse and SAV I will be
completed only if needed.
Liquor Operations
The profitability of St. Anthony's Liquor Operations continues to be a focus for City
Staff and Council. Projected Year 2001 profits of$230,800 represent a 12.5% increase
over 1999 profits.
As in the past years, a portion of the liquor profits is transferred to the General Fund to
offset administrative costs associated with this enterprise operation. Last year's transfer
totaled $90,000. Due to the increased costs in computer processing, networking and
additional staff time spent on liquor analysis and administration, staff is recommending
the liquor transfer be increased to $100,000.
Changes to Liquor Operations may occur at SAV I and the Stonehouse depending on
what happens to the redevelopment of the St. Anthony Shopping Center area.
Conclusion
St. Anthony is a thriving and redeveloping community and undoubtedly major
renovations and projects will continue in the coming years. Protecting and
maintaining our infrastructure so that our City works both now and in the future
will be an exciting challenge for City Staff and Council.
One of Council's goals is to keep the Village look and feel to our community.
Accordingly, service demands and the City's efforts to meet those demands, will
continue to increase as these changes take place in our community.
While the City always seeks to serve the residents' needs at the lowest possible.cost,
major renovations to the City streets, parks and stormwater protection will inevitably
lead to future demands in City spending. The City Council and Staff will need to .
closely monitor the needs of the community to:determine the level of services and the .
affordability of those services.
Yours truly,
%�d��+G1GQ-QGL
• Mike Mornson
City Manager
$ 1®7
INTRODUCTION
The City of St.Anthony is primarily a residential community, which neighbors the
communities-of Minneapolis, Roseville, New Brighton and Columbia Heights. The City is at
or near full development, with the economy consisting of light industrial, commerce and
retail related businesses.
Form of Government
The City of St. Anthony operates under the Statutory Plan B form of government. Under
this form of government, the City Council appoints the City Manager who then governs the..
Administration, Finance, Police, Fire, Public Works and Liquor Departments.
Budget Process
In April, City Staff and Council met to discuss the budget goals for 2001 and review
estimated revenues and expenditures. Also, a Public Hearing was held to provide the
Citizens with an opportunity to communicate suggestions for the 2001 budget.
• In late May, Department Heads start the preparation of their budgets for the next calendar
year (St. Anthony's fiscal year is a calendar year).
In June, Department Heads submit their budget requests for the general, special revenue,
debt service and enterprise funds to the Finance Director. Budget requests are reviewed to
determine if they are accurate, reasonable and well justified. Staff requests may be
modified according to projected revenues, needs and justification.
Once completed, the First Draft of the budget is prepared based upon initial revenue
estimates, departmental budget requests, historical trends and financial policies.
The City's five-year capital equipment plan and corresponding upgrades to city buildings
are prepared in a similar manner, however are expanded to include longer-term goals,
needs and projections:.
In July, the City Manager and Finance Director meet with the City Council. This work
session is a budget workshop that is held with the City Council where the proposed budget
is discussed and each department's requests are reviewed. Adjustments or final revisions
are made to the proposed budget and the First Draft is distributed to the general public.
Copies of the budget are available at City Hall, the Hennepin County Library, the City
Liquor Stores and I.D.S. #282 Administration Offices.
9 1®8
•... At a Council Meeting in August, a budget overview is presented to the community.
In September, the City certifies a proposed tax levy and budget to Hennepin and Ramsey
Counties. Also, at this Council Meeting a public hearing is held to discyss the tax rate
increase. Once the proposed.levy has been certified, the levy cannot be increased, but may
be reduced during the fnal certification process in December.
In late October, Staff calculates the proposed tax rate and tax capacity numbers to
determine the impact on residential and commercial properties.
In November, the proposed budget and tax levy is published and Truth in Taxation Notices
are mailed to property owners. The Council holds a public hearing on the budget and
proposed tax levy in late November or early December and afterwards approves the final
operating budget and tax levy.
The City's property tax levy (approximately 20% of the total taxes collected), which is
necessary to finance the approved budget, is then certified to the Counties who collect the
property taxes on behalf of the City, School District, County and other Taxing Districts.
During the fiscal year, line items may be overspent as long as the total activity budget is not
overspent. City Staff may request recommended changes in their activity budget to the
City.Manager who then submits the request to the City Council who can approve or
disapprove the amendment. If Council approves an activity to be overspent, the property
tax levy may not be amended to fund the-appropriation.
Respectfully submitted,
�aqe� .�a�acs
Roger Larson
Finance Director
10 1®9
IMPORTANT DATES
St. Anthony Budget Schedule for 2001 Budget
April 11, 2000 Preliminary Introduction with the City Council.
Discuss Budget Goals for 2001/Review Estimated
Revenues for 2001.
April 25, 2000 Public Hearing for Citizens to Communicate 2001 Suggestions.
(Department Heads will be present).
April - May City Manager& Staff Meetings to discuss Budget
Revisions from April 25°i Meeting.
July 25, 2000 City Council Afternoon Work Session(3:00 PM to 6:00 PM)
to Discuss Proposed Budget. Regular Council Meeting at 7:00 PM.
August 8, 2000 Proposed Budget is Presented to the City Council.
(Overview for Council and Community).
September 12, 2000 1) Resolution passed setting Proposed 2001
Tax Levy and Budget
2) Resolution passed setting Public Hearing and
reconvening dates.
3)Passage of resolution authorizing a Tax Rate
Increase for Collectible Year 2001 Tax Levy.
October 31, 2000 Staff provides City Council with Tax Capacity&
Proposed Tax Rate Impact.
November 29, 2000 *****
December 21, 2000 City must conduct a public hearing, which cannot conflict with
Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Independent School District
#282 or the Special Taxing Districts hearing dates.
December 2000 Public Hearing Date and announcement of second Public
Hearing for reconvening/passage of the 2001 final Tax Levy.
December 2000 Reconvening Hearing Date and/or Public Hearing date for adoption
of 2001 Tax Levy by resolution.
*****Please note: The public hearing must be held between November 29th and December 18th. The
City's initial public hearing cannot be held on the same day as Hennepin or Ramsey Counties Initial
. Hearing Dates, I.S.D. #282 Initial Hearing Date or Metro Special Taxing Districts Hearing Date.
110
f
ST. ANTHONY'S KEY GOALS FOR 2000 - 2001
• PROVIDEr 140 YEAR FLOOD PROTECTION fFOR AlL RESIDENTS AND'
a
BUSINESSES TO PROTECTS HEALTH AN- PROPERTY _....
❖ TRESERVETHE BEAUTY FOF THE PROPERTY NOW OWNED BY THE
s �.r � ��. 3 +�
SA�UATION ARMY CAMP. TO SERVE BOTH CURRENT SAND,FUTURE
_ GENERi4T1ONS '�. .
r t, ss ,,.,,,fib,. Y....'.'�--s�•. �_c-a,n � x;.
❖ ' ` FOCUS ON sREDEVELOPMENTjINITIATIUES SO-THAT OUR IMAGE-
"J' AND TAX 4BA'SE STAYS FIRM �` `' �` ` ` `r
v
❖ KEEP THE VILLAGE LOOK AND.FEEL SO THAT,WE ARE ATkTRACTIVE=
TO 'BOTH RESIDENTS`i4ND BUSINESSES
,� p l�.. x 3 a..
❖ PROTECT AND MAINTAIN :OUR INFRASTRUCTURE=SO THAT;OUR = 4
L g
C1TY WORKSe BOTH NOW AND„;IN°THEF.UTURE #k
-
• 1 LN' s �n. v ?�""
URr 'i'.. i'S;.a.RE
OFFER rCLEAR, CNT, ANilD OPENCO.MMUNICATIONS ,THROUGH F
A=VARIETYOF�MEANSSOPEOPLE�AREINFORMED �►BOUT3T ' � �`
ANTHONY'S IMPgO.RT4NTISSUESAND�NEIVS "��,.��>� , . , �r ���
•: > d'PROVLDE A PARK SYSTEM THATOFFERS A MIX�OF RECREATIO,,..NAL
r
'� ; s.;...� � ,� -s ;+
❖ r,SH/aPE'THE FUTURE B DEFINING AND REVIEWING iREGUL"ARL-iY�OUi'
. FrvGOA►LSAND FISCALPOLfC1ES
111
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Phone (612) 789-888
Fax (612) 781-9323
E-Mail city @ci.saint-anthony.mn.us
Principal City Officials
Dennis Cavanaugh, Mayor
Term Expires 12/31/03
Richard Horst Amy Sparks
Term Expires 12/31/03 Term Expires 12/31/03
Brian Thuesen Randy Hodson
Term Expires 12/31/01 Term Expries 12/31/01
Ci Staff
Michael Morrison, City Manager
Spencer Isom, Assistant City Manager
Richard Engstrom, Police Chief
Joel Hewitt, Fire Chief
Roger Larson, Finance Director
Jay Hartman, Public Works Director
Michael Larson, Liquor Operations Manager
Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk
ST. ANTHONY ORGANIZATION CHART
ST.ANTHONY VILLAGE RESIDENTS
MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
Planning Commission
Parks Commission
ADMINISTRATION
City Manager .
Assistant City Manger City Clerk
Election Judges(PT)
FINANCE FIRE POLICE PUBLIC WORKS
Finance Director Fire Chief Chief of Police Public Works.Dir.
Accounting Tech Asst Fire Chief Captain Supervisor
Utility Billing Clerk
Receptionist/Permit Clerk Captains Lieutenants Mechanic
Accounting Clerk(PT)
Wtr./Swr.
Firefighters Sergeant Parks
Volunteers(PT) Maint.
Police Officiers Workers
Secretary Community Service Officers
Clerk Reserves(unpaid)
LIQUOR OPERATIONS
Liquor Operations Manager
Manager, Stonehouse Liquor Store Manager,SAV I Liquor Store Manager, HE II
Kitchen Manager Bartender r Clerks(PT) F Clerks(PT)
Servers(PT) Bartenders(PT)
D Checkers(PT) -Cashier
' 113
i ij
FU N',�NE L D
T ;
1
The General Fund accounts for
resources devoted to financing
general services. These include
General Government, Police, Fire,
Public Works and Parks. It is the
largest budget and is the main
operating fund of the City
2000 2001 Dollar
Budget Budget Decrease Percentage
$31527,450 $31519,875 ($ 4,575) (0.21 %)
2000 2001 Dollar
L v LeMy Increase Percentage
$1,646,970 $1,763,475 $116,505 7.07%
1'
114 ,
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
REVENUES 1998 11999 2000 2001
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Property Taxes $1,611,779 $1,623,024 $1,647,970 $1,766,475 7.19%
Licenses $6,208 $8,863 $10,000 $10,550 5.50%
Permits $90,637 $101,593 $85,400 $99,500 16.51%
Intergovernmental Revenue $678,207 $780,695 $717,757 $738,918 2.95%
Contract Revenue(Lauderdale/Falcon Heights) $504,310 $529,426 $550,173 $569,432 3.50%
Charges for Service (Fines) $88,389 $100,647 $100,000 $100,000 0.000/0
Miscellaneous Revenues $121,131 $164,565 $76,150 $135,000 77.28%
Transfers 8E Miscellaneous Revenues $65,094 $8.6,344 $3.44.444 $100-00 -70.59%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL REVENUES $3 16S,661 $3,395,153 $3.527.450 $3,519,875 -0.21%
EXPENDITURES 1998 1999 2000 2001
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Mayor/City-Council $49,874 $51,349 $58,000 $53,000 -8.62%
Public/Intergovernmental Relations $13,052 $19,197 $17,450 $19,500 11.75%
Cable Franchise $14,906 $17,667 $20,500 $18,000 -12.20%
General Management $86,137 $84,705 $114,400 $93,000 -18.71%
Elections $15,073 $14,213 $22,800 $16,400 -28.07%
Finance, Insurance/Accounting $190,818 $200,145 $271,700 '$212,400 -21.83%
Finance,Assessing $32,397 $34,395 $37,000 $36,500 -1.35%
Legal $45,567 $55,062 $59,800 $58,400 -2.34%
Engineering,Planning/Zoning $4,338 $2,488 $9,100 $2,700 -70.33%
City Building $91,620 $98,671 $98,900 $104,600 5.76%
Civil Defense/Emergency Management $35,206 $36,162 $40,900 $40,400 -1.22%
Police Protection $807,416 $919,028 $1,010,700 $983,600 -2.68%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights Contracts $421,844 $437,871 $474,300 $491,200 3.56%
Fire Protection $463,000 $465,164 $494,300 $527,975 6.81%
Inspections,Building/Plumbing/Heating/Health $63,941 $65,830 $66,300 $69,800 5.28%
Animal Control $3,213 $3,151 $5,700 $3,400 -40.35%
Public Works $328,919 $338,758 $420,700 $367,800 -12.57%
Public Works,Maintenance/Repair Equipment $81,899 $97,828 $117,400 $103,700 -11.67%
Tree and Weed Care $21,661 $21,679 $30,700 $25,400 -17.26%
Parks $59,657 $69,624 $81,800 $105,100 28.48%
Transfers to Other Funds $260,972 $197,697 $75,000 $75,000 0.00%
Budget Reserves $0 $0 $0 $112,000 100.00%
Other Expenditures (Approved by Council) $4 %43,008 IQ. $4
GENERAL FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,091,Slo $3.273,692 $3,52750 $3__;519,875 -0.21%
FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $711,294 $870,708 $870,708 $982,708
•
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Misc. Transfers
Fines 3.8% 2.8%
2.8%
Contracts
r
16.7%
Tax Levy
pt%1 Pr
50.2%
ntergov't License &
Revenue Permits
20.6% 3. 1
4b 4b
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
Transfers Budget General Gov't
° 8.5%
Finance &
2. 1 /° Reserves
Insurance
3.2%
Public Works 6.0%J
..y I nspections
2.0%
Fire
Police
16.2 16.2 /0
Contracts 28.0%
14.0%
1 117
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 10, 2000
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: TAX RATE CALCULATION AND IMPACT
The tax rate is based on the amount of St. Anthony's budget and road levy, less the City's
distribution from the Fiscal Disparities pool and then dividing the net levy (Local Levy) by
current valuation estimates from Hennepin and Ramsey Counties (Total Local Tax
Capacity).
The information necessary to complete the Tax Rate ,
Calculation is available from Hennepin a Ramsey
Counties in Mid-October to Early-November. At that
time, the impact will be calculated and included in this
budget document.
1181
The information necessary to complete the Tax Rate
Calculation is available from Hennepin 8z Ramsey
Counties in Mid-October to Early-November. At that
time, the impact will be calculated and included in this
budget document.
20 119
The Information necessary to compete this calculation will be available in October.
WHAT DO I GET FOR MY TAXES?
AVERAGE $ 0.00 HOME
ESTIMATED ANNUAL CITY TAX $0.00
EXPENDITURES 2001 TAX LEVY % OF TAXES
BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET PAID
Mayor/Council $53,000.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/01
Public/Intergovernmental Relations $19,500.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Cable Franshise $18,000.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/0!
General Management $93,000.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Elections $16,400.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Finance, Insurance /Accounting $212,400.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!.:" #DIV/01
Finance, Assessing $36,500.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/0!
Legal $58,400.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Engineering, Planning/Zoning $2,700.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/0!
City Buildings $104,600.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Civil Defense $40,400.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Police Protection $1,474,800.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/01
Fire Protection $527,975.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/01
.Inspections, Building/Plumbing/Heating/Health $69,800.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/0!
Animal Control $3,400.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Public Works $367,800.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Public Works, Maintenance/Repair Equipment $103,700.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/01
Tree and Weed Care $25,400.00 $0.00 #DIV/01 #DIV/01
Parks $105,100.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/01
Transfers to Other Funds $75,000.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Budget Reserves $112400-00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #LV/O!
GENERAL FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3519,875.00 $0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
SAINT ANTHONY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
2000
1998 1999 2000 Y-T-D Estimated 2001
Taxes Actual Actual Budget 6-30-00 Actual Budget
101-30110-000 Property Taxes $1,552,425.00 $1,622,028.00 $1,646,970.00 $0.00 $1,614,030.60 $1,763,475.00
101-30120-000 Pen alties,lnterest,Tax ForFltures $3,704.00 $996.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $980.00 $3,000.00
101-30140-000 Misc Taxes 555,650.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Taxes 51.61 1,779.00 $1.623,024.00 11,647,970.00 50.00 $1.615,010.60 :51.766,475.00
2000
1998 1999 2000 Y-T-D Estimated 2001
Licenses Actual Actual Budget 6-30-00 Actual Budget
101-31100-000 On 8z Off Sale(3.2 Beer) $675.00 $600.00 $1,100.00 $0.00 $1,078.00' $1,100.00
101-31120-000 Cigarette $250.00 $2,025.00 $500.00 $0.00 $490.00 $500.00
101-31130-000 Dog $183.00 $1,486.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,470.00 $1,500.00
101-31140-000 Heating $705.00 $720.00 $700.00 $0.00 $686.00 $1,200.00
101-31150-000 Motor Vehicle Starting. $135.00 $135.00 $150.00 $0.00 $147.00 $150.00
101-31170-000 Bench $147.00 $147.00 $150.00 $0.00 $147.00- $150.00
101-31180-000 Bowling Alley $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-31190-000 Garbage 8L Trash Collection $1,000.00 $930.00 $1,300.00 $0.00 $1,274.00 $1,300.00
101-31200-000 Juke Box $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $98.00 $100.00
101-31210-000 Pinball/Amusement Devices $150.00 $0.00 $500.00 $0.00 $490.00 $500.00
101-31230-000 Gasoline Service Station $1,283.00 $1,170.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $1,176.00 $1,200.00
101-31240-000 Vending $190.00 $190.00 $300.00 $0.00 $294.00. :. $350.00
101-31250-000 Wine $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 $0.00 $490.00 $500.00
101-31260-000 Club $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-31270-000 Contractors License $1,420.00 11,450-00 $2,000.00 $1,960.00 $2.000.00
Total Licenses $6.208.00 $8.863.00 510,000.00 50.00 59.800.00 110,550.00
N
r
•
4b
2000
1998 1999 2000 Y-T-D Estimated 2001
Permits Actual Actual Budget 6-30-00 Actual Budget
101-32100-000 Grade $28.00 . $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-32110-000 Building Permits $49,035.00 $64,533.00 $45,000.00 $0.00 $44,100.00. ; $56,500.00
101-32115-000 Plan Review $17,109.00 $13,275.00 $18,500.00 $0.00 $18,130.00- $14,000.00
101-32120-000 Plumbing Permits $4,284.00 $2,149.00 $4,800.00 $0.00 $4,704.00 $2,600.00
101-32130-000 Heating Permits $10,172.00 $10,167.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 $7,840.00 $10,000.00
101-32140-000 Gas $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00. $0.00
101-32150-000 Excavation $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $0.00 $98.00 $100.00
101-32160-000 Conditional Use Permits $260.00 $130.00 $400.00 $0.00 $392.00 $400.00
101-32170-000 Fire Permit $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-32170-000 Occupancy $345.00 $105.00 $400.00 $0.00 $392.00 $400.00
101-32180-000 Multi-Housing Registration $1,144.00 $1,144.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $1,176.00 $5,500.00
101-32200-000 Alarm System Permit 58.210.00 $1 ,040.00 $7.000.00 $0.00 $6,860.00 510,000.00
Total Permits $90,637.00 $101,59300 585,400.00 10.00 $83,692.00 $99,500.00
2000
1998 1999 2000 Y-T-D Estimated 2001
In reovernmental Revenue Actual. Actual Budget 6-30-00 Actual Budget
101-33100-000 Maintenance/State Aid $54,823.00 $58,876.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 $49,000.00 $58,000.00
101-33200-000 Police Special $110,562.00 $111,819.00 $90,000.00 $0.00 $88,200.00 $110,000.00
101-33250-000 Cops Grant/Dept.of justice $0.00 $89,064.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 $49,000.00 $41,500.00
101-33300-000 Lauderdale Police Contract $167,970.00 $176,419.00 $183,156.00 $0.00 $183,156.00 $189,578.00
101-33350-000 Falcon Heights Police Contract $336,340.00 $353,007.00 $367,017.00 $0.00 $367,017.00 $379,854.00
101-33400-000 Local Government Aid $140,979.00 $149,962.00 $153,165.00 $0.00 $153,165.00 $147,079.00
101-33450-000 L.G.A.Trust Fund.Surplus $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-33500-000 State of Mn H.A.C.A. $336,523.00 $336,599.00 $349,208.00 $0.00 $349,208.00 $356,439.00
101-33550-000 Local Performance Aid $11,134.00 $10,202.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00_ $0.00
101-33560-000 PERA Rate Increase/State Aid $7,197.00 $7,197.00 $7,184.00 $0.00 $7,040.32 . $7,200.00
101-33600-000 Civil Defense/State Aid $4,000.00 $4,247.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 $3,920.00 . $4,000.00
101-33700-000 Hennepin County/ice Bt Snow Remova $10,250.00 $10,558.00 $10,200.00 $0.00 $9,996.00 $10,700.00
101-33800-000 Ramsey County/Sweeping $0.00 $0.00 . $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-33900-000 IDS#282 Misc. Services $2,73200 12,171.04 $4,490..00 $0.120 X3+220,00. 14,440.00
Total Intergovernmental Revenue $1.18 0517.00 $1,310;121.00 $1.267,930.00 50.00 $1.263,622:32 $10308,350.00
2000
Miscellaneous 1998 1999 2000 Y-T-D Estimated. 2001
101-36100-000 Actual Actual Budget 6-30-00 Actual. Budget
Municipal Court Fines 588,389.00 $100,647.00 5100,000.00; $0.00 $98,000.00 $100,000.00
Total Miscellaneous $88,389.00 $100,647.00 $100,000:00 $0.00 $98,000.00 $100,000.00 ^'
(r
N
2000
1998 1999 2000 Y-T-D Estimated 2001
Use of Money at Propee_rN_ Actual Actual Budget 6-30-00 Actual Budget
101-38100-000 Interest on Investments $25,112.00 $22,341.00 $24,000.00 $0.00 $23,520.00 $26,400.00
101-38200-000 Filing Fees $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-38300-000 Variance Permits $120.00 $680.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $980.00 $500.00
101-38400-000 Weed Eradication $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
101-38500-000 Sale of Maps $68.00 $43.00 $50.00 $0.00 $49.00 $50.00
101-38600-000 Copies $1,624.00 $2,032.00 $1,800.00 $0.00 $1,764.00 $2,000.00
101-38700-000 Special Assessment Searches $88.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $98.06 $100.00
101-38800-000 Plat Fees $150.00 $425.00 $200.00 $0.00 $196.00 $250.00
101-38900-000 City Hall Rent/Reservadons $1,055.00 $1,375.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $980.00 $1,200.00
101.38910-000 Miscellaneous $89,951.00 $135;658.00 $45,000.00 $0.00 $44,100.00 $101,500.00
101-38920-000 Apache Plaza/Malnt Services $2,963.00 11,991.00 $30000.00 $Q.QQ $2,940.00 : 53,000 00
Total Use of Money at Property $121,131.00 1164,565.00 $76,150.00 $0.00 $74,627.00 $135.000.00
2000
1998 1999 2000 Y-T-D Estimated. 2001
Refunds at Reimbursements Actual Actual Budget 6-30-00 Actual Budget
1.01-39830-000 Liquor Fund $65,000.00 $65,000.00 $90,000.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 $0.00
101-39880-000 Levy Reduction Transfer $0.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 $82,082.00 $0.00
101-39890-000 Transfer from Other Funds $0.00 $21,340.00 $1500000.00 10.00 1100,000.00 $100,000.00
Total Refunds at Reimbursements $65,000.00 $86,340:00 1340,000.00 10.00 $247,082.00 $100,000.00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $3,165,661.00 $3,395;153.00 $3,527,450.00 $0.00 $3,391,833.92 $3,519,875.00
IRA' W
53 7�����:0�w�
` um '
`
2001 BUDGET
Cap|udEqwpinent Revenues:
General Fund Transfer...................................................................................................................$75,[00 `
`
Police Contracts:
Lauderdale --__. —$24,O0]
FalconHeights............................................................................................................................$30,800
Water/Sewer Transfer.......................................................................................................................$l
Interest Earnings _ $1
Trade/Sale cf Existing Equipment.........................................................................................................$7,5oo
Capital Equipment Fund Balance —___.—__—__---.—__--'__—'—_---_--.$l70,975
(Current Balance$194,205)
1999 Liquor Profits--_--___--_--__---'---__---._------__---.--_—_—~_—
2000 Liquor Profits.........................................................................................................................$91^���
Total $503/400
Capital Equipment Expenditures:
—
'
° Three police squad
~ Tear Down mc Build New Squads...........................................................................................» *,5uu
^
^ Lauderdale/Falcon Heights funding v[capital equipment purchases.
~�w~ Fire
`Turnout $
ReplacePersonal,Computers(5)..........................................................................................$12,5W
9[Software Upgrades..........................................................................................................»3
ReplaceEpson Lazo Printer..................................................................................................»
Upgrade—Windows'98
Misc.Network Upgrades.......................................................................................................
Public Works:
$
Crew Cab Truck $a
� 3A Ton Pick-up
Total Public Works...........................................................$93,oqo '
RehirbishPark Equipment...................................................................................................
Total Parks $25 1 00
HVAC $
TnmExpwndimns-----------__---$S03400
�
�
�
124
2001 — Levy Review
Increases in revenues and downsizing of expenditures help
offset the removal of the Contigency Transfers from the
Revenue Budget.
2000 Levy $1,6463970
Budget Changes:
VillageFest Contribution $ 59000
Park Maintenance Employee $ 26,900
(3/4 of one full-time employee — balance is
budgeted in Community Services)
Clinton Cops Grant $ 2500
Civil Defense/Increase $ 59500
Fire Protection/Increase $ 54,100
Projected 2001 Levy $13763,475
Dollar Amount $ 11.69505
Percentage 7.07%
4b
3-YEAR LEVY COMPARISON:
Proposed
1998 1999 2000 2001
General Fund Levy $1,566,767 $1,616,147 $1,646,970 $1,763,475
Increase $36,761 $49,380 $30,823 $116,505
Percentage 2.40% 3.15% 1.91% 7.07%
Road Levy $174,089 $237,206 $238,142 $272,789
Increase $40,084 $63,117 $936 $34,647
Percentage 29.91% 36.26% 0.39% 14.55%
Total Levy $1,740,856 $1,853,353 $1,885,112 $2,036,264
Increase $76,845 $112,497 $31,759 $151,152
Percentage 4.62% 6.46% 1.71% 8.02%
Less:
Fiscal Diparities . ($279,700) ($299,786) ($323,356) ???????
Divided By:
Total Tax Capacity $4,974,964 $4,820,500 $5,144,474 ..???????
Equals Tax Rate 29.372% 32.229% 30.359% ???????
Average City Taxes $454.09 $477.19 $476.33 . . . . . . .
Average Home Valuation $114,000 $118,000 $125,000 ???????
i'J1
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS
4b
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: July 2000
Expenditures: Mean Average
58%
07/3112000 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Scent . Budaet
Mayor/Council $58,000.00 $40,018.69 $17,981.31 69% 31%
Intergovernmental Relations $17,450.00 $3,967.53 $13,482.47 23% 77%
Cable Franshise $20,500.00 $14,869.61 $5,630.39 73% _ 27%
General Management $114,400.00 $66,754.49 $47,645.51 58% 42%
Elections $22,800.00 $6,221.93 $16,578.07 27%. 73%
Finance/Insurance $271,700.00 .$118,350.31 $153,349.69 44% 56%
Finance/Assessing $37,000.00 $34,007.33 $2,992.67 92%. 8%
Legal $59,800.00 $28,876.12 $30,923.88 48%. . 52%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $9,100.00 $565.92 $8,534.08 6% 94%
City Buildings $98,900.00 $28,1.10.41 $70,789.59 28% 72%
Civil Defense $40,900.00 $22,444.53 $18,455.47 55% . . 45%
Police Protection $1,010,700.00 $537,247.19 $473,452.81 53% 47%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $474,300.00 $252,822.21 $221,477.79 53% 47%
Fire Protection $494,300.00 $277,745.15 $216,554.85 5M . 44%
Inspections/Building Permits $66,300.00 $32,628.65 $33,671.35 49% 51%
Animal Control $5,700.00 $1,261.40 $4,438.60 22% 78%
Public Works $420,700.00 $175,809.04 $244,890.96 42%' 58%
Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $117,400.00 $49,711.30 $67,688.70 42% 58%
Tree and Weed Care $30,700.00 $8,855.63 $21,844.37 29% 71%
Parks $81,800.00 $45,146.67 $36,653.33 55% 45%
Transfers to other Funds $75.000.00 $37,500.00 $37.500.00 00 5
Total Expenditures $3,527,450.00 $1,782,914.11 $1,744,535.89 51% 49%
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 06/30/2000
Interest Date
FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK Raze Purchased Maturity Book Value
INVESTMENT DEMAND-MONEY MARKET SAVINGS 5.22% 1 DAY LIQUIDITY(SWEEP) $353,579.67
41M GENERAL
$386,000 FORRESTAL FUND COMM PAPER 5.95% 04/17/00 08/18100 $378,152.94
$385,000 COOPERATIVE ASSN OF TRACTO 6.39% 06/22/00 10120/00 $376,799.50
$500,000 FNMA MED TERM NOTE 8.046% 08/10/99 08/18/14 $153,150.00
$500,000 FHLB-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.000% 11/18/99 07/28/17 $124,800.00
$1,032,902.44
4/M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.010% 11/05/98 11/05/08 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.175% 12/07/98 12122108 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.00% 12121/98 06/23104 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 02103/99 02/24/14 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03/03199 03/03/14 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.25% 03/09/99 03124/14 $100,000.00
$ 45,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.20%e 03/18/99 01/21/08 $45,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.50% 03/30/99 01/24108 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.15% 04/13/99 04/14/14 $100,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.46% 05/12199 01108/08 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 7.00% 06104/99 05106/14 $199,000.00
$137,000 F.H.L.B. STRIPS 6.38% 08/23/95 08125/00 $100,060.69
$800,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 01/12/99 01/28/19 $202,057.98
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.20% 01/12/99 01/28/19 $126,286.24
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 8.12% 09109199 07114/17 $48,312.00
$190,000 MERRILL LYNCN COMM PAPER 6.07% 04/19/00 07/17/00 $187,228.64
$2,207,945.55
DAIN RAUSCHER-GENERAL
$52,000 FICO STRIPPED COUPON 9.37% 6/22/90 12106/01 $19,891.31
. $30,000 RFCO STRIPPED COUPON 9.22% 8/24/90. 10/15/00 $12,686.95 .
GNMA POOL 4734 8.50% 02101/75 01/15/05 $299.73
GNMA POOL 6472 7.50% 07101/75 07/15105 $1,421.40
GNMA POOL 14376 7.50% 03101(17 03/15/07 $2,778.11
GNMA POOL 23364 9.00% 09/01178 09/15108 $1,378.65
GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01178 11/15/08 $2,471.40
$628,000 GEN MOTORS COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.20% 04/05/00 07105100 $618,445.58
$631,000 GEN MOTORS COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.30% 04/05/00 08/03/00 $818,196.87
$1,277,570.00
DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL
$125,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.041% 11/16199 07/14/17 $31,076.25
$312,000 FNMA-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 11/17/99 08/09/19 $66,407.96
$100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12/15/99 03/08/29 $10,105.00
$200,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.15% 12/17/99 08/04/17 $48,945.00
$130,000 FNMA-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.30% - 06/01/00 08102/18 $29,555.30
$47,833 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05% 02/06192 .02106/03 $8,939.02
$45,000 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05% 03/09/92 02/06103 $8,377.25
$75,000 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05% 03125/92 02/06/03 $13,850.08
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03103/99 03/03/14 $200,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.150% 04/14/99 04114/14 $200,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 07/15/99 02/24/14 $193,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 8.00% 08/25/99 08/25114 $200,000.00
$1,010,255.86
JOHN G-KINNARD
$68,000.00 US TREASURY BOND STRIP 99NV15 6.57% 07/19/94 11/15/99 $48,202.79
. $43,000.00 FICO FED STRIP SERIES 1 7.479% 11/09/94 05/11/02 $24,781.96
$500,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/29/98 08/20/18 $128,730.00
$1,200,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/21198 09/10/18 $307,538.40
$250,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COU 6.109% 02118/99 07/07/17 $60625.00
$550,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE 7.950% 11/24/99 06/22118 $129,228.00
Time8/1 100 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT JUNE 2000idsINVESTI
JOHN G-KINNARD (Continued)
$90,000.00 GREENWOOD TRUST-CID 7.00% 10/06/94 10/12/01 $90,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.28% 06/11/98 10/02/02 $100,578.13
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.065% 07/08/98 07/08/02 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.025% 08/05/98 08/05/02 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.284% 01/14/99 01/14/09 $99,750.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK-CALLABLE 6.390% 05/17/99 05/17/06 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.50% 06102/99 06/02/14 $99,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.50% 06/02/99 06/02/14 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE -7.40% 06/11/99 06/09/14 $100,000.00
$85,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM'NOTE 8.00% .02122100 02/22/10 $85,000.00
$1,673,434.28
DEAN WITTER
$100,000.00 HURLEY STATE BANK-C/D 7.15% 09/21/94 09/21/01 $100,000.00
JURAN&MOODY
$150,000 GSIF FRMAC SERIES 10 7.50% 03/09/93 03/09/07 $31,726.34
$200,000 FNMA-9334 P/O 7.24% 04/20/93 03/25/23 $32,368.10
$200,000 GSIF FRMAC SER 1166.6% 7.00% 04/20/93 04/20/08 $73,701.09
$11,000 FICO STRIPS SERIES 11 9.40% 10/15/93 08/08/06 $7,991.70
$100,000 FRMAC SER 11 MPRG 33.3 7.00% 01/25/94 01/25/09 $41,064.51
$50,000 FHLMC MCB SER 1629MB 7.00% 02/07/94 01/15/23 $42,193.90
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 7.01% 08/06/97 02101/07 $200,000.00
$300,000 FED HOME LOAN MORT CORP-AAA RATED 6.60% 11/03/97 10/13/04 $302,513.03
$148,000- FHLMC STEP-UP NOTE 7.00% 06/08/98 04/30/13 $148,000.00
$400,000-FNMA SEMI 30/360 6.14% 09/09/98 09/10/08 $401,317.10
$200,000-FNMA SEMI 30/360 6.30% 09/10/98 09/10/08 $200,498.83
$200,000-FNMA CALLABLE 6.5% 6.50% 09/24/98 01/24/08 $298,803.49
$300,000-FNMA SEMI 30/360 5.65% 5.65% 11/12/98 11/12108 $202,617.34
$150,000-FHLM SEMI 301360 6.50% 6.50% 02/17/99 02/17/06 $151,301.42
$200,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 6.50% 6.50% 03/10/99 07/28/08 $199,318.23
. $200,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 7.02%. 7.02% 08/17/99 02/17/05 $200,000.00
$2,533,415.08
$309,000 AMSTEL COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.253% 04/18/00 07/14 100 $304,462.34
TOTAL BOOK VALUE $10,493,565.22
-----------------
- -----------------
i
i
TimeB/1/00 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT JUNE 2000.xIsINVESTI i
• I
4b
JUNE - 2000 City of St.Anthony
Profit&Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE 06/30/00 06/30/99 (Decrease)
Sales $176,651.00 $173,433.00 $64,052.00 $2,222,922.00 $2,121,067.00 $101,855.00
Less:Cost of Goods Sold $138,627.00 $137,779.00 $18,420.00 $1,589,495.00 $1,540,273.00 $49,222.00
Gross Profit $38,024.00 $35,654.00 $45,632.00 $633,427.00 $580,794.00 $52,633.00
Ratio to Net Sales 21.52% 20.56% 71.24% 28.50% 27.38%
Operating Expense:
Salaries,Wages, Benefits .$14,214.00 $13,255.00 $29,184.00 $278,111.00 $259,943.00 $18,168.00
All Other Expenses $10,582.00 $11,695.00 $19,044.00 $262,372.00 $253,416.00 $8,956.00
Total Operating Expense $24,796.00 $24,950.00 $48,228.00 $540,483.00 $513,359.00 $27,124.00
Ratio to Net Sales 14.04% 14.39% 75.30% 24.31% 24.20%
Profit from Operations $13,228.00 $10,704.00 ($2,596.00) $92,944.00 $67,435.00 $25,509.00
Other Income $329.00 $220.00 $2,737.00 $24,718.00 $21,389.00 $3,329.00
Net Income $13,557.00 $10,924.00 $141.00 $117,662.00 $88,824.00 $28,838.00
Ratio to Net Sales 7.67% 6.30% 0.22% 5.29% 4.19%
June-Net Income $24,622.00
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 06130100 $57,666.00 $45,166.00 $14,830.00 $117,662.00
YEAR TO DATE 06130199 $31,762.00 $21,084.00 $35;978.00 $88,824.00 (Audited)
INCREASE/DECREASE $25,904.00 $24,082.00 ($21,148.00) $28,838.0'0
t
t
June - 2000 City of St.Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I SAV II
Beginning Inventory: $250,529.50 Beginning Inventory: $223,525.44
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers ($2,110.52) Transfers $2,110.52
Adjustments ($116.49) Adjustments ($1,915.04)
Returns to Vendors ($12,017.32) Returns to Vendors ($1,377.52)
Add: Receiving $135,931.93 Add: Receiving $149,036.00
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($138,627.30) Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($137,778.62)
TOTAL $233,589.80 TOTAL $233,600.78
Total per Valuation Report $233,828.98 *'* Total per Valuation Report $234,379.23
Difference $239.18 Difference $778.45
Beginning July 2000 Inventory $233,828.98 Beginning July 2000 Inventory $234,379.23
***Comes from Valuation Report ***Comes from Valuation Report
4
1999 Actual Profits (Audited) 2000 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAV I
SAY II Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Stonehouse Profits Comparison
January $5,123.00 ($1,509.00) $4,418.00 $8,032.00 January $4,569.00 $1,343.00 $4,496.00 $10,408.00 $2,376.00
February $4,252.00 $4,800.00 $5,529.00 $22,613.00 February $2,511.00 $3,419.00 ($4,306.00) $12,032.00 ($10,581.00)
March $6,694.00 $4,882.00 $7,278.00 $41,467.00 March $9,915.00 $9,020.00 $9,039.00 $40,006.00 ($1,461.00)
April $7,020.00 ($6,956.00) $9,152.00 $50,683.00 April $15,157.00 $9,893.00 $6,060.00 $71,116.00 $20,433.00
May ($1,683.00) $8,570.00 $1,526.00 $59,096.00 May $11,957.00 $10,567.00 ($600.00) $93,040.00 $33,944.00
June $10,356.00 $11,297.00 $8,075.00 $88,824.00 June $13,557.00 $10,924.00 $141.00 $117,662.00 $28,838.00
July $7,238.00 $8,097.00 ($2,564.00) $101,595.00 July $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $117,662.00
August ($276.00) $259.00 $6,880.00 $108,458.00 August $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $117,662.00
September $7,480.00 $5,350.00 $1,970.00 $123,258.00 September $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $117,662.00
October $5,738.00 $4,850.00 $7,413.00 $141,259.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $117,662.00
November $9,956.00 $14,749.00 .$6,635.00 $172,599.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $117,662.00
December $6.936.00 $21,116.00 $4.574.00 $205,225.00 December. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $117,662.60
Total $68,834.00 $75,505.00 $60,886.00 $205,225.00 Total $57,666.00 $45,166.00 $14,830.00 $117,662.00
Increase/(Decrease) $25,904.00 $24,082.00 ($21,148.00) $28,838.00
Y-T-D By Store
4b
Stormwater Fund#702 07/3112000
Projeted
Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $420;152.55
MSA Bonds $400,000.00 $9,600.00
DNR $3,540,000.00 $1,834,032.97
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Stone Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $385,296.71
Storm Sewer City Bonds $1.540.000.00 $16.100.00
Total Project Budget $8,530,000.00 $3,515,182.23
Other PEOlect Activity:
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75
Met Council $20,000.00 $5,000.00
Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $29,457.95
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 $26.035.87
Total Revenues $8,831,000.00 $3,891,692.07
07/31/2000
Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Date
WSB-Engineering Services $337,367.75
Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $24,134.19
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025.00
Purchase of Flood Homes $936,623.13
Flood Relief Grant Program $50,386.30
Private Homes-Dumpsters $1,774.15
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,008,832.77
2000 Street Improvement Project $221,847.99
Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1441.981.41
Total Expenditures $4,027,928.68
Project Balance- -$136,236.61
Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $46,942.09
EAPEURE REPORT 0713112000
•
WSB: Flood Relief Grant Program:
Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Expenditure
Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennls/Penny Gault $10,000.00
Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00
Stormwater Task Force $29,243.00 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00
Stormwater Engineering $22,011.86 Castle Building&Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00
Flood Problem Analysis $27,178.98 L.N.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00
MCES Grant Application $1,475.25 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00
DNR/FEMA Grants $6,820.50 St.Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00
Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 RHeWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00
Park Design $147,995.10 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80
Harding Street Design $32,938.13 Twin Cities Glass Block-2521 W.Armour Temace $29250 _
In Study $20,601.00 Total Flood Relief Program $50,386.30
Flood Grant-1998/1999/2000 $21297.50
Total WSB $337,367.75 Private Homes-Dumpsters
Project Description:
Barr Engineering: Waste Management $391.65
Project Description: Nancy Myhran $259.50
District 96 Watershed Study $2.749.3$ Linda Gonler $198.00
Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Susan Kozarek $925.04
Total Dumpsters $1,774.15
Dorsey&Whitney:
Project Description:
Legal Services for Flooding Issues $18,071.16 Sump Pump
Legal Services-Comdenatlon of Homes $1,930.00 Project Description:
Legal Services-Harding Street $1,252.80 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2880-23 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $115.64
Total Dorsey&Whitney $24,134.19 Total Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64
Water Quality Study:
Silver Lake: 1999 Street Improvement Project
Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Project Description:
WSB-Engineering Services $168,977.77
Purchase of Homes: Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85
Project Description: Northdale Construction $816,772.32
Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Treemendous $460.00
Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Moody's Investment Services $3,250.00
Demolition $9,156.00 Dorsey&Whitney $2,911.55
Taxes $839.61 Bond Issuance Expense $7-625.28
Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 Total 1999 Street Project $1,008,832.77
Check for Asbestos-Abatement Servlces $365.00
Seal&Cap Well $1,450.00 2000 Street Improvement Project
Purchase of 2713 SL Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Project Description:
Demolition $11,258.00 WSB-Englneering.Services $112,665.54
Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc. $70,80730
Recording Deed/iaxes $2,506.98 Buchan Environmental Services $2,248.99
Title Insurance $946.00 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/ConsWctlon Bulletin $232.93
Seal&Cap Well $1,420.00 Bond Issuance Expense $35.893.23
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 Total 2000 Street Project $221,847.99.
Purchase of 270012704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $205,528.49 Silver Point Park/Construction
First American Title $375.00 Project Description:
Evergreen Land Services $3.369.47 Richard Knutson,Inc, $339,159.22
Total Purchase of Homes $936,623.13 Richard Knutson,Inc; $300,593.77
Richard Knutson,I=, ' $130,084.79
Richard Knutson,Inc, $305,667.27
Richard Knutson,Inc, $56,486.88 .
Richard Knutson,Inc, $50,176.49
Richard Knutson,Inc, $140,028.70
Richard Knutson,Inc, $109,601.19
Trlllum Park $10.183.10
Total Payments to Contractors $1,441,981.41