HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 09122000 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
100571
Box: 17
Folder. CC PACKETS 1999-2001
Document: CC PACKET 09122000
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 12, 2000
8:00 PM
Council Chambers
PAGE(S)
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
III. ROLL CALL.
IV. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR
MEETING AGENDA.
V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
A. Proclamation declaring Kiwanis "Peanut Day" :................................... 1
• VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular
agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address
for the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City
Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically
refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on
an upcoming agenda.-
VII. CONSENT AGENDA. .........................
These items are considered routine and will.be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of these items unless a'Councilmember or citizen so requests,
in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
elsewhere on the agenda.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.-
A. Resolution 00-067, re: Set Proposed 2001 tax levy and
City Budget and Resolution 00-068, re: Authorize tax
rate increase ......................................................................... 24 - 33
IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
• A. Frontline Church ordinance amendment request ......................... 34 --52
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
September 12, 2000
• Page 2
PAGE(S)
B. Resolution 00-065, re: Emergency vehicle preemption .................. 53 - 66
C. Resolution 00-078, re: Livable Communities Act ........................ 67 - 69
D. Resolution 00-079, re: City's participation in the Building
Qualities Communities effort ................................................... 70 - 71
E. Discussion of funding option for Central Park .................................. 72
X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF - None.
XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS. ............... 73 - 74
XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS AREA TTACHED.
V. PROCLAMATIONS.
1 . Kiwanis Peanut Day.
1
Oain ffla. tho
e
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the Kiwanis Club of St. Anthony is an
organization dedicated to helping community
youths educationally and spiritually; and
WHEREAS, The Kiwanis Club of St. Anthony is also
committed to other community services; and
WHEREAS, an order to raise funds for its many and varied
programs, the Kiwanis Club of St. Anthony
has requested a day be set aside in St. Anthony
Village for the sale of peanuts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Anthony
City Council hereby designates FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 22,
2000, as
ST. ANTHONY KIWANIS PEANUT DAY
Mayor
I d �
• Date
i
VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
1 . City Council Meeting Minutes - August 22, 2000
2. Licenses/Permits (Page A in packet)
9
3. Claims
2
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY -
• 2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 August 22, 2000
4 I. CALL TO ORDER.
5 Mayor Cavanaugh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
6 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
7 Mayor Cavanaugh invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
8 III. ROLL CALL.
9 Councilmembers present: Mayor Cavanaugh; Councilmembers Sparks, Thuesen, Horst, and
10 Hodson.
11 Councilmembers absent: None.
12 Also present: City Manager Michael Mornson; City Attorney William Soth.
13 IV. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 22,2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA.
14 Motion by Sparks to approve the August 22, 2000 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda as
15 presented.
16 Motion carried unanimously.
017 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
18 A. Jim Nelson from the Metropolitan Council will present the City with a plaque for
19 participation in Livable Communities.•
20 Mayor Cavanaugh recognized Metropolitan Council Commissioner Jim Nelson who represents
21 the City of St. Anthony.
22 Jim Nelson, Metropolitan Council,presented Mayor Cavanaugh with a plaque in appreciation of
23 their participation in Livable Communities and commented on the importance of providing a
24 liveable community and the need for-careful planning. He urged the Council to carefully
25 consider these issues and offered the assistance of the Metropolitan Council's staff.
26 . VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.,
27 Mayor Cavanaugh asked for input from the audience for items that are not on the.regular agenda.
28 Mary Rockwood, 3404 Silver Lake Road, advised of the great opportunity for residents to
29 participate in developing a St. Anthony Community Concert Series. She announced the concert
30 series will begin September 28, 2000 and advised of their schedule, ticket prices, and where
31 tickets can be purchased. George Rockwood presented the Mayor and Councilmembers with
32 concert tickets that are for sale. Ms..Rockwood urged the community to participate in this very
33 important event.
034 Mayor Cavanaugh extended his appreciation to Mary Rockwood for her work towards this
35 effort, which has been undertaken almost single-handedly. All in attendance displayed their
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
• August 22, 2000
Page 2
1 VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
2 Motion by Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda.for the August 22, 2000 City Council meeting,
3 which consisted of-
4 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of August 8, 2000;
5 2. Licenses and Permits; and
6 3. Claims.
7 Vote: Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen and Mayor Cavanaugh voted aye. Councilmember
8 Hodson abstained due to his absence at the August 8, 2000 meeting.
9 Motion carried.
10 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
11 None.
12 IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
13 None.
4 X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
5 A. En ing eerin g Items:
16 1. Resolution 00-069, re: Award bid for Harding Lift Station and Resolution 00-077,
17 re: Award bid for Force Main Construction.
18 City Manager Morrison reviewed the three resolutions that are under consideration by the
19 City Council tonight and the purpose of each.
20 Mayor Cavanaugh requested a report from Todd Hubmer of WSB. Mr. Hubmer
21 presented the bids that were received for the lift station improvements at Harding Avenue
22 and the forcemain improvements. He advised that Great Western Corporation submitted
23 the lowest bid in the amount of$64,744 for the lift station improvements, and
24 MinnComm Utilities Construction submitted the lowest bid in the amount of$60,190 for
25 the forcemain improvements. Mr. Hubmer recommended approval of the low bids to
26 complete the improvements.
27 Thuesen asked if the bids were competitive. Mr. Hubmer reviewed the bids, noting there
28 was quite a wide range.
29 Motion by Thuesen to approve Resolution 00-069, a Resolution Awarding a Contract to
30 Complete Harding Street Sanitary Sewer Lift Station improvements and Resolution 00-
31 077, a Resolution Awarding a Contract to Complete Harding Street Sanitary Sewer
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
Page 3
1 Forcemain Improvements.
2 Motion carried unanimously.
3 2. Resolution 00-070, re: Decorative Lighting;
4 Mr. Hubmer reviewed the work of the Planning Commission to obtain public input to
5 select decorative lighting for the Village of St. Anthony which included a display during
6 VillageFest and a public forum where invitations were mailed to residents along MSA
7 streets. The results of those events were presented to the Planning Commission on
8 August 15, 2000 and following discussion, the Planning Commission recommends that
9 black colored Vernon fixtures be adopted as the standard fixture for municipal state aid
10 streets and that the shoebox fixture be utilized at intersections or areas where the
11 decorative fixtures do not supply ample light to meet lighting requirements. Mr. Hubmer
12 advised that the City of Minneapolis selected the Lantern fixture and the Planning
13 Commission felt the lighting fixtures in St. Anthony should be a bit different. In
14 addition,there were concerns by residents about light pollution. He commented on the
15 Dark Sky movement that is underway and desire to not emit lights upward into the
16 atmosphere. Mr. Hubmer noted the lantern fixture on display in the Council Chambers,
17 advising it was the second most efficient fixture available from NSP. He explained the
18 light is actually within the top of the fixture and is directed downward via lenses and.
9 reflector.
20 Horst asked if this is a standard fixture with economies or what the cost is above the
21 standard fixture. Mr Hubmer stated the Vernon fixture is about $500 more per fixture
22 than the lantern selected by the City of Minneapolis. He presented the costs for the eight
23 fixtures styles considered and advised that there is an economy of scale with the fixture
24 being recommended and the costs may be reduced further since it is one of the most
25 popular NSP fixtures and they are beginning to warehouse them.
26 Horst stated his understanding there were to be no assessments to residents for these
27 fixtures and he wondered if that was still possible based on the higher cost. Mr. Hubmer
28 stated the cost of the Vernon,fixture remains in line with the cost estimates presented to
29 the Council.last fall.
30 Thuesen stated he shared the same concern after reviewing the Planning Commission
31 minutes. He stated his support to hold to that standard while achieving this type of
32 decorative lighting.
33 Cavanaugh noted the policy specifically includes decorative lighting to be installed only
34 during reconstruction projects.
35 Mr. Hubmer stated staff will work with NSP to create a lighting plan which will develop
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
tPage 4
1 lighting standards, amount of light desired, spacing, and costs. Horst asked if the City
2 will financially subsidize the lighting plan. Mr. Hubmer stated it had been discussed that
3 the City's assessment policy has a 65%City/35%resident split which may be a
4 consideration should lighting be petitioned. Mr. Hubmer stated they anticipated using
5 MSA funds to make up a portion of the lighting budget and there are other options such
6 as splitting the additional cost on the 65%/35%basis. He noted the money is in hand for
7 the 26th Avenue project.
8
9 In response to Sparks, Mr. Hubmer displayed pictures of several contemporary-style
10 lighting fixtures that were considered.
11 The Council concurred to revise the resolution to include the Vernon fixture in a black
12 color.
13 Motion by Hodson to approve Resolution 00-070, a Resolution Adopting Decorative
14 Lighting Standards for Municipal State Aid Streets.
15 Sparks stated her appreciation for the large amount of public input received on this issue
16 and thanked staff for their.effort.
�7 Motion carried unanimously,
8
19 3. Resolution 00-076, re: Evergreen Land Survey to conduct appraisals and
20 negotiate for Harding flood miti ation.
21 Mr. Hubmer stated the proposed resolution would hire Evergreen Land Services
22 Company to conduct appraisals and negotiate for Harding Street easements for the storm
23 water improvement project. He explained the estimated costs involved for appraisals are
24 a little higher than in the past but noted the critical nature of these appraisals for the
25 completion of this project.
26 Hodson asked if staff believes this is one of the best appraisers available, noting the
27 importance of assuming the;appraisals include all of the needed information. Mr.
28 Hubmer stated the appraiser comes highly recommended and reviewed the other
29 controversial projects this appraiser has been involved with.
30 Mayor Cavanaugh asked if residents have been notified of the schedule. Mr. Hubmer
31 stated residents were informed of the meeting tonight and some have indicated a need to
32 know where the boundaries are before proceeding. He stated those boundaries will be
33 surveyed and staked in the field so the appraiser can talk with the land owner and explain
34 the area under negotiation.
35 Motion by Thuesen to approve Resolution 00-076, a Resolution Authorizing Appraisal
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 5
1 and Acquisition Services for Properties Relating to Flood Mitigation in the City of St.
2 Anthony.
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4 B. Planning Commission Issues 1of Aujaust 15, 2000 meeting;
5 1. Resolution 00-071, re: Sign variance request by Murphy's Service Center, Inc.,
6 for 3501-29th Avenue NE.
7 Mayor Cavanaugh invited Doug Bergstrom, Chair of the Planning Commission, to
8 address the Council.- Mr. Bergstrom reviewed for the Council the public hearings held by
9 the Planning Commission at their August 15, 2000 meeting, noting the minutes from that
10 meeting are in abbreviated summary form rather than in a detailed verbatim form. He
11 reviewed their consideration of this request for a variance to replace a business sign at the
12 Murphy's Service Center gas station located at 3501 - 29th Avenue NE, and
13 recommendation for approval as the criteria for a variance consideration exist.
14 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-071, a Resolution Relating to a Request for a
15 Sign Variance for 3501 - 29th'Avenue NE.
�6 Mayor Cavanaugh asked if this sign will be lit with flood lights 24-hours a day. Richard
7 Graff, applicant, stated the new sign will be lit from the interior 24-hours a day as it will
18 provide a measure of security. He stated there will be no spotlights on this sign but
19 currently there is a floodlight on the driveway sign.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 2. Resolution 00-072, re: Subdivision/plat by Village North LLP and Apache
22 Animal Medicine.
23 Mayor Cavanaugh stated his understanding that all three of the next considerations hinge
24 on the issue of parking. Mr.-Mornson suggested Mr. Bergstrom present all three cases
25 and then the issues can be-considered separately.
26 Mr. Bergstrom reviewed for the Council that the first consideration related to replatting
27 the property from two lots into three lots to expand the Animal Clinic lot, decrease the
28 Industrial Custom Products lot, and create a new lot on the other side of the Industrial
29 Custom Products lot. He presented a map to better explain the new lot configurations. .
30 Mr. Bergstrom stated Mr. Hubmer determined the utility line on the east side would
31 benefit from a dedicated City easement.and a 10 foot easement will be created for the
32 City between Lots 1 and 2. The Planning Commission recommends approval subject to
33 two conditions relating to the easements.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 6
1 Mr. Bergstrom stated the second public hearing related to the parking which, in the
2 Industrial zone, is based on"head counts" in the building. He noted that can fluctuate
3 quite a bit depending on the tenants but if the parking requirements are based on square
4 footage, it would be more consistent. Mr. Bergstrom advised that the applicant was
5 asked if he could acquire property from the railroad but after negotiations it is not yet
6 known if he can acquire it. Therefore, since he does not own the property, it could not be
7 included in the parking calculations. Mr. Bergstrom stated a lengthy discussion was held
8 with the Planning Commission including the light industrial parking requirements of
9 other cities but it is difficult to determine what the appropriate parking requirement
10 should be. He stated they reached a conclusion that even after research that"right
11 number" may not be known so they recommended approval of the rezoning subject to a
12 condition to change the square footage from 1,000 to 800 and recommendations of the
13 City staff and City attorney.
14 Mr. Bergstrom stated the third consideration was a rezoning of Apache Animal Medicine,
15 which is currently not zoned, to Commercial and the Industrial Custom Products parcel
16 rezoned to Commercial to be:consistent with the newly created parcel. The Planning
17 Commission recommends approval of the rezonings based on positive findings of fact.
18 Hodson questioned the parking element and if that is something which could be dealt
9.. with via a variance. Mr. Bergstrom stated the.application submitted was to amend the
0 Zoning Ordinance which is what the Planning Commission acted on. He stated the
21 Planning Commission shares the concern about a"global" consideration.
22 City Manager Morrison noted the resolution indicates going to 1,000 square feet but the
23 meeting minutes indicate 800 square feet. Mr. Bergstrom corrected that the minutes are
24 correct and the recommendation is for.800 square feet.
25 City Attorney Soth explained that a variance consideration is not appropriate since to
26 grant one, a hardship must b0ound which includes the ability to make reasonable use
27 without the variance. He noted-this property has been put to a reasonable use for many
28 years so that finding could not be met. He stated the applicant is making a case that 350
29 square feet creates a parking requirement that is unusually high, although it is the same as
30 New Brighton. In this case,the building has about 72,500 square feet of floor area
31 requiring over 260 parking spaces and the question is whether this type of property needs
32 260 spaces. Using 1,000 square feet, it would require 72 parking spaces and the Planning
33 Commission determined that something in between those numbers (800 square feet) is a
34 better number.
35 Mr. Bergstrom stated the current owners lease and use of the railroad property so there is
36 ample area for parking if the railroad property can continue to be used. However, that
•
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
Page 7
1 property is not in their ownership so it could not be considered by the Planning
2 Commission.
3 Thuesen inquired regarding'g`the recommendation by City Att orney Soth at the Planning
4 Commission. City Attorney'Soth stated he recommended the City change the ordinance
5 to eliminate the process of counting employees and that the number be changed.
6 Ken Solie, applicant, stated the issue of impact to other properties is a valid one. He
7 displayed the City's zoning map, noting the light industrial area is fully developed so
8 changing the parking requirement should not be an impact. He suggested the parking
9 deals with the use of the building and is a self-limiting issue.
10 Sparks asked if a solution is to buy property from the railroad. Mr. Solie stated they
11 currently lease a strip of land behind their building from the.railroad for about$6,000 per
12 year. It is about 55 feet deep, leased until 2003, and then it will be renewed. To
13 purchase the land, the cost would be approximately $200,000. He noted they have
14 adequate parking, even without the added railroad land.
15 Cavanaugh asked if the present lease arrangement cannot be considered in the parking
16 requirements. Mr. Soth stated Mr. Solie does not own the land so it cannot be considered
�7 and the current parking situation is incompliance since it is grandfathered.
18 Cavanaugh expressed concern about considering an ordinance amendment for this one
19 property, noting this property will be in compliance until 2003 and then the lease will
20 probably be renewed. Mr. Solie stated his belief that they have adequate parking and
21 reiterated that all of the other light industrial land is developed so there will not be a
22 similar request for the development of a light industrial property.
23 City Attorney Soth recommended the Council first deal with the parking ordinance.
24 3. Resolution 00-073 and Ordinance 2000-008. re: Zoning ordinance amendment
25 relating_to parking requirements in LI Districts (only one reading is s required .
26 Sparks expressed concern with considering an ordinance amendment without additional
27 research and study-or knowledge of implications for St. Anthony. Mr. Bergstrom stated
28 the Planning Commission did discuss those issues at some length but determined that
29 even after study, it would be difficult to determine what that exact"right number"would
30 be. He noted that the allowed uses do not compare to what is allowed by other cities in
31 their light industrial districts. Another point is that there are other administrative
32 measures the City has at its control.
33 Mr. Solie noted the City has an Occupancy Permit procedure which can be used to
34 restrict a business that is over parking. He suggested that the recommended number of
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
• August 22, 2000
Page 8
1 parking spaces may be arbitrary but is considered to be reasonable by other cities.
2 Cavanaugh stated his preference to have rationale.for selecting the square footage
3 number. He stated it looks like bad planning to arbitrarily pick out the number 800
4 without having a solid basis to make that consideration so he is not comfortable with the
5 process used.
6
7 Hodson stated he understands the argument of Mr. Bergstrom about how much study
8 would be needed to gain quantitative data to gain that rationale. He stated he is
9 comfortable with the Planning Commission recommendation of 800 square feet.
10 Morrison reviewed the history of this business,noting it is grandfathered and there is a
11 long history with the railroad lease that,extends back farther than Industrial Custom
12 Products. He stated staff could look at the three industrial areas to determine what the
13 existing parking ratio is currently. However, those areas were built prior to the City
14 having any industrial restrictions in place and are all grandfathered.
15 Motion by Hodson to approve Ordinance 2000-0008, an Ordinance Relating to Zoning;
16 Amending Section 1650.05, Subd. 1(e)(7) of the City of St. Anthony Code of Ordinances
17 with 800 square feet.
08 Vote: Councilmembers Hodson, Horst, Thuesen and Mayor Cavanaugh voted aye. Councilmember
19 Sparks voted nay.
20 Motion carried.
21 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-072, a Resolution Relating to a Joint Request
22 for a Subdivision/Preliminary Plat Approval for 2801 and 2501 - 37th Avenue NE.
23 Motion carried unanimously.
24 4. Resolution 00-074 and Ordinance 2000-09, re: Rezoning request by pache
25 Animal Medicine for a portion-of 2801 - 37th Avenue NE from LI to C and a
26 rezoned railroad parcel to C (only one reading nquired).
27 Mr. Morrison noted this consideration is contingent upon recording of the final plat.
28 Motion by Horst to approve Ordinance 2000-0009, an Ordinance Relating to Rezoning.
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30 Mayor Cavanaugh called a recess at 8:20 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:25 p.m.
•
10
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 9
1 C. Hillcrest(Apache)Project Items:
2 1 Resolution 00-066, re Preliminary and Final Development Plans for Apache
3 Plaza property.
4 Mayor Cavanaugh stated this item has been before the Planning Commission and Council
5 since January and the consideration tonight is approval of the development plans and
6 rezoning to a PUD which will allow the community and developer a measure of
7 flexibility. He stated he has received a request from Mr. Shardlow, Mr. Tankenoff, and
8 the community to speak. He invited John Shardlow, DSU, to speak first noting the
9 Council can ask questions during any of the presentations.
10 Mr. Shardlow presented the latest revisions as detailed in Mr. Gleekel's August 17, 2000
11 letter to the City, revised Exhibits A, B, O and P. He advised the applicant has agreed to
12 upgrade the baseline facade treatment to be Exhibit I which is a higher quality exterior
13 finish than previously agreed to.
14 Scott Tankenoff, managing partner of Hillcrest Development, distributed a letter
15 indicating Liberty's interest in the project. He advised that Liberty has met with City
16 staff to present their company's history and goals.
�7 Paul Malone,-Liberty Vice President of Planning& Research, introduced himself and
8 Liberty, explaining they offer checks but the larger part of their business is to provide
19 Internet website hosting, Internet banking, and marketing services to credit services. He
20 advised of their current office space, number of employees, and need to expand their
21 corporate offices. He stated they believe St. Anthony would be a great geographic
22 market in a good employee market. Mr. Malone stated the image they cast to their
23 customers is very important as being professional, capable, and a good value. In that
24 effort, a remodeling of Apache Plaza to reuse existing buildings and not contribute to
25 sprawl is supported by their-corporate image. He stated they have been negotiating a
26 lease with Hillcrest since February but cannot sign a lease until the plans are furthered
27 through a PUD process. However, they have drafted a letter of understanding with only
28 two outstanding business issues so he expects, if approved, they will sign a lease within
29 several weeks and take occupancy as soon as possible.
30 Thuesen welcomed Mr. Malone and stated it is important for the Council and community
31 to meet a possible entity for this site. He asked questions of Mr. Malone with regard to
32 the level of quality and aesthetics of the.building, where Liberty sees themselves in the
33 future as a long-term tenant at this site, and what happens should the check market fail.
34 Mr. Malone stated it would be important for their building to be viewed as an attractive
35 building and advised that concern was raised by corporate officers that the other users
36 along Silver Lake Road may..detract to their building so they would prefer to have a
37 building that is visually separated from other current uses. He explained that if all the
•
11
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 10
1 Internet banking should not occur as predicted, their check business will survive and they
2 believe it will be a good and-profitable business for them for years to come. Mr. Malone
3 commented on the structure of credit unions as a non-profit'entity and struggle to
4 compete with large banks in bringing services to their clients. He explained how they
5 have determined a strategy to work with credit unions to assist them in marketing
6 products to their clients. Mr. Malone advised that Liberty is privately owned, has turned
7 down several offers for purchase, and is in the process of devising a plan to sell the
8 company to the employees upon the owner's death. He stated while they are planning
9 very carefully, no one can guarantee the longevity of a business. Thuesen stated it
10 appears Liberty has made an effort to'diversify.
11 Horst asked if Liberty will have significant input on what happens with the rest of the
12 development related to outside appearance and other tenant mix. Mr. Malone stated they
13 do not have veto power but have indicated the uses must be compatible with Liberty's
14 image to assure it does not-detract from their operation. He stated they have made it
15 clear in the written specifications to Hillcrest Development that the other uses cannot be
16 incompatible with Liberty or effect them negatively (noise, dust, heavy traffic).
17 Cavanaugh inquired regarding the size. Mr. Malone stated the first phase is 80,000
18 square feet.
09 Mr. Tankenoff clarified the schedule dates Mr. Shardlow mentioned are the "outside"
20 dates and the landscape percentages are minimum amounts. He stated the exclusive
21 marketing date is June of 2001. Mr. Tankenoff stated Liberty has agreed to speak with
22 the Council and community but other tenants are not comfortable coming forward at this
23 time. He stated that while Liberty will be the anchor tenant,the fascia would have to be
24 something that is compatible;for all tenants. He noted the 30%to 40% increase in the
25 preferred plan with a tenant,like Liberty. Mr. Tankenoff stated their goal is to meet more
26 than the mark and to over deliver what is being stated.
27 Mr. Tankenoff delivered a lengthy statement reviewing the number of public meetings
28 held on this project since January 2000, input from'a neighborhood group, and their
29 diligent work with City staff and the Council on TIF issues. He stated his professional
30 opinion that this building is not suitable for demolition. Be stated that while there are
31 worn components,the infrastructure is not flimsy and this issue has been studied and
32 confirmed by their consultants. Mr. Tankenoff suggested that other types of uses could
33 result in impacts to the tax structure, school system, and levy. He suggested that the
34 market has spoken, since this property has been studied and considered in different ways
35 and is still being discussed today: Mr Tankenoff stated that there is probably not a
36 perfect plan or a perfect contract but there are good intentions and asked the Council to
37 consider other projects by,_HIl prest Development and its track record. He suggested the
38 existing building shows a lack of ownership commitment, dedication, and long-term
•
12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 11
1 corporate misuse.
2 Mr. Tankenoff stated they agreed to the PUD process rather than a zoning district and
3 have responded to every question raised by the City or residents in an honest and direct
4 manner. He noted the PUD was applied for and there has been consistent work with the
5 PUD and TIF agreements at a large time and financial commitment. Mr. Tankenoff
6 reviewed the dates for various submittal and considerations, noting the unanimous
7 recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval after two considerations. Mr.
8 Tankenoff stated they have made changes,in an effort to receive unanimous Council
9 support and suggested the City is basically getting the preferred plan. He emphasized
10 that Hillcrest Development feels so strongly about this project that they were willing to
11 put their money in first and proceed with no tenants.
12 Mr. Tankenoff noted the percentages for the interim plan, marketing deadline, fascia
13 upgrades,preleasing commitment, and interim use of the New Market site as a soccer
14 field. He commented on the letter from Liberty, noting this is a premier company with a
15 desire to grow and invest in their office. Mr. Tankenoff suggested that the loss of a client
16 like Liberty will result in the loss of the other two tenants and send out a negative
17 marketing message.
08 . Mr. Tankenoff suggested the highest and best use is clearly what they are proposing. He
9 noted other prospects have attempted;to work with this site but not succeeded. He stated
20 that retail is out of the question due to not having freeway visibility or adequate access.
21 This leaves business or residential use noting a residential use would need to be
22 balanced with the schools. He stated this proposal allows them to use existing
23 infrastructure which is adequate and does not promote sprawl, noting they have
24 completed projects in the 1950s that remain vital and have stood the test of time. He
25 stated this project is consistent with the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan and they
26 have tried to be sensitive to.the City grant application with the Metropolitan Council.
27 Mr. Tankenoff stated this site needs a massive updating and they will work with the
28 watershed district to address issues related to Silver Lake. He noted they will pay up-
29 front for the drainage improvements and there is no bonding or administrative costs to
30 the;City. He suggested their project in the Stinson neighborhood is an example that they
31 can accommodate projects in residential neighborhoods. Mr. Tankenoff stated they have
32 seen the vision and path to progress that is possible and stand before the Council as being
33 ready to make the financial commitment to see the project through. He stated they want
34 to move forward in a partnership mode with the City, suggesting it would be
35 unreasonable to not proceed. He offered to answer questions that arise during public
36 comment and stated his appreciation to stand before the Council and represent this
37 project, assuring the Council=that they will not miss the mark with this project.
•
13
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 12
1
Doug Jones,ones, 2505 Silver Lane,stated his main concern is the water quality issues with
2 water that flows to Silver Lake. He stated he spoke with Mr. Hubmer who assured him
3 the plan, as proposed, includes standards that exceed the Rice Creek Watershed District
4 standards if the entire property were torn down and redeveloped. He stated he wants it .
5 on record that the drainage improvements include the flow of water from the roof,
6 parking lots, and areas around the building to be treated in ponds to remove phosphorus
7 prior to flowing into Silver Lake. On that basis, he supported the project since it meets
8 the requirements of the neighborhood.
9 Perry Thorvik, 3112 Townview Avenue, stated he was amazed that the Planning
10 Commission passed this project with a 7-0 vote knowing what they knew at that time.
11 He stated the plans have changed since that time and in the proposal today, it is obvious
12 that his concerns about the facade, landscaping, dates, and percentages of nonoffice space
13 were heard and taken into consideration. He stated he does not know if this has gone far
14 enough, but he has seen compromise, even though it took 24 meetings to get those
15 compromises by the developer.
16 Motion by-Thuesen to approve Resolution 00-066, a Resolution Approving the
17 Preliminary and Final Development Plans Relating to the Apache Plaza Property,
18 submitted by Hillcrest Development Limited Partnership.
09 Sparks read prepared statement indicating her belief that Hillcrest Development has
P P P
20 done an incredible job in putting together this proposal and there no doubt they are
21 reputable with a good track record. However, when running for Council she talked about
22 the need for planning and to hire economic development staff to address the best use of
23 Apache Plaza. Spark stated:she.believes the Council is reacting with the Hillcrest
24 proposal because it was subzntted and sounds good. However, as the plan unfolded, she
25 believed it became less likely that what the Council wanted would occur. She asked if St.
26 Anthony has explored all of the options and recommended the City do a thorough plan
27 including Apache Plaza along with the other assorted pieces mentioned tonight so it is
28 looked at as a whole. Sparks stated her regret that she did not come to this realization
29 sooner and save Hillcrest Development and City staff,who worked so hard to his
30 proposal,their time and money. She suggested if this were the preferred plan,the
3.1 Council would not be seeing that 51%of the plan is likely to be wholesale and similar
32 uses. Spark stated she does not want that type of use and have them as'permitted uses
33 over time.
34 Hodson stated he agrees with Spark's comments and recommends the City gather more
35 information and get more definition on this project He stated he is looking for more
36 certainty and feels this project has been pushed rapidly. Hodson stated he believes that
37 Hillcrest Development is amreputable company and he wants to work with this
38 corporation. However,he believes the City has been rushed too quickly to make all of
14
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 13
1 the right decisions.
: 2 Horst read a prepared statement suggesting this is a bigger question than if this project is
3 right or wrong but,.rather, about how things are run in the City. He commented on the
4 involvement of the City Manager, planning staff, Planning Commission, and number of
5 meetings held, suggesting that to indicate the process is moving too fast is ludicrous. He
6 agreed that there may be some risk but cautioned the Council about losing an opportunity
7 to develop the most blighted property in the City under the notion that there are other
8 developers out there since there have been no other developers it the past 12 years. Horst
9 commented on the plan, vision, money, and track record of Hillcrest Development,
10 noting that when Apache Plaza was built, there was probably not 100%tenants. Horst
11 stated this proposal is to build a high quality office complex and fill it with quality
12 tenants. He questioned if there are other developers willing to "jump through hoops" and
13 withstand the scrutiny this developer has had to endure. Horst suggested it is impractical
14 to develop housing due to the impact on the school district, major development costs,
15 need for more TIF assistance, and the high cost of demolition. He asked what it would
16 cost to demolish Apache Plaza and install sewers,roads, and drainage. Despite tax
17 compression efforts by the State, he felt commercial properties still paid higher taxes
18 than can be paid by homeowners and that this project would be valued higher than
19 housing. He asked how St. Anthony,can work with another developer when it is still
�0 : nitpicking and playing word games with this developer.
21 Horst asked if residents want Apache Plaza redeveloped at all, noting staff has come up
22 with a plan to make that happen. He noted there is risk and uncertainty but that is
23 because all of the components:have not yet been identified. However, this developer has
24 stated it will happen and has a track record so he believes it will happen and so should the
25 residents. Horst urged the residents to look at the real issues and what is allowed under
26 the PUD. He stated this project would result in a new building that meets codes with new
27 landscaping. If the PUD is voted down and the opportunity lost, he predicted that when
28 he leaves office, Apache Plaza will look the same or worse than it does today. He stated
29 he served on the Planning Commission when the CUB Foods site was considered and
30 even though there were some nay sayers, the City got the CUB Foods store which is a
31 testament of what can be done if the City pulls together with a common goal..
32 Horst stated City staff and the consultants recommend approval because it is the right
33 deal and right timing. He urged approval of the project so they can all stand before the
34 new St. Anthony Technology Center and say they had a part in it.
35 Thuesen read a prepared statement indicating that to say he is disappointed is an
36 understatement but he is much more disappointed as a resident of the City. He expressed
37 his desire to be true to himself and the community so they know where he is coming from
38 and to be the final judge. He stated he has never hidden or run away from a controversial
•
15
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
• August 22, 2000
Page 14
1 issue while an elected representative and is happy to be held accountable. Thuesen stated
2 most of the conversations have been peaceful and productive dialogues but along the way
3 it turned into an emotional, nasty debate. He stated he had received a call whereby he
4 was treated with abuse which showed him something had gone astray. Thuesen
5 commented on the high regard he holds his responsibility as a teacher in being
6 responsible for children, which he finds to be the most precious commodity and worth
7 more than anything, including Apache Plaza. He stated in comparison,the Apache Plaza
8 consideration was not pressure to him.
9 Thuesen commented on the impact of this project on the City and suggested there is a
10 fine line between analyzing a situation and losing objectivity and your viewpoint. He
11 stated he asked himself if.he,was remaining objective and not locking himself into a
12 position too early. Thuesen stated he finds the redevelopment as proposed stands on its
13 own merits and he judged it on its own merits, suggesting that a yes vote is not an act of
14 desperation on the part of the City Council. He stated that he would vote against the
15 project without hesitation if he believed it was a bad deal for the City, even if there were
16 no other deals "waiting in the wings." He noted the overwhelming vote of confidence
17 and support from the Planning Commission which is a body of diverse residents who did
18 an outstanding job in analyzing this project. Thuesen commended the Planning
19 Commission for their effort and congratulated them for a job well done. .He noted the
l0 consultants that worked on this project in an effort to guide the City through these issues.
l Thuesen noted there are little or no financial risks to the City, even with the
22 condemnation process should that occur.
23 Thuesen noted that Hillcrest.Development has hit targets at a high level and you cannot
24 ignore history as it is a great predictor of what will occur in the future. He stated there
25 will be pros and cons and a level of uncertainty and risk but, after weighing those issues,
26 he still believes residents will benefit in the short and long term for Hillcrest
27 Development to work their preferred plan in the redevelopment of Apache Plaza.
28 Thuesen stated he is not on the Hillcrest payroll and owes them nothing but wanted to
29 thank them for coming in and putting up with the "games" played. He congratulated the
30 community Liberty decides to move to-and thanked Hillcrest for being above board,
31 incredibly honest, and straight forwar&..Thuesen stated he hopes St. Anthony is that
32 lucky the next time.
33 Cavanaugh stated it has been 12 to 15 years since the tornado hit Apache Plaza and it has
34 been on the decline since that time. He stated the question before the Council is the
35 redevelopment of 35 acres,which is no small matter and he appreciates the frustration and
36 anxiety of his colleagues. He-noted that CUB Foods was not a stand alone project but
37 part of what was expected to be a renaissance of retail development, however,that did
38 not happen. Cavanaugh stated previous Councils supported retail so that was the driving
39 force sent to developers as the preference of the Council. As a result, two movie theater
•
16
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 15
1 proposals came and went.
2 Cavanaugh noted the proposal being considered tonight was not sought by the City and
3 the question Mr. Tankenoff raised initially was whether the City was interested in
4 something other than retail. He stated a nontraditional proposal was made that contained
5 a lot of unpredictability and he sees it as having an inordinate amount of risk. Cavanaugh
6 stated that changes have been made but there are still three facades in the portfolio. He
7 suggested that not having a focus has been difficult in determining the risk and end use of
8 the property which brought him to the most serious consideration which is that of use.
9 He stated a high tech office complex was presented with the flexibility to rent the
10 remaining space while getting to the preferred plan. Then it was presented that the
11 interim uses could become permanent. Cavanaugh stated he does not think that range of
12 uses is in the best interest of the community. He noted the level of financial assistance
13 offered as an incentive to get to the preferred plan, not the interim plan. Cavanaugh
14 stated he understands the concern about impact to schools but believes there is a need for
15 housing.
.16 Cavanaugh suggested this is the opportunity for the community to be proactive and do its
17 own planning rather than relying on what comes through the door. He stated the
18 challenge to the community is to plan for this 35 acres rather.than considering uses for
19 this building which will be 65 years old when TIF is over. Cavanaugh stated he supports
0 a moratorium on this property and working cooperatively to determine the best use and
21 assure the highest value to this community.
22 Mr. Morrison noted the resolution motion on the floor is to approve the rezoning which
23 requires a 4/5ths vote.
24 Vote: Councilmembers Horst and Thuesen voted aye. Councilmembers Hodson and Sparks and Mayor
25 Cavanaugh voted nay.
26 Motion failed.
27 City Attorney Soth advised that the attorney for applicant has raised a technical point that
28 a motion for denial was not made. He recommended the Council vote on denial of the
29 application to rezone.
30 Tony Gleekel, attorney for Hillcrest Development, stated they submitted an application
31 and met all of the requirements. Mr. Gleekel stated the motion made and voted on by the
32 Council was to approve the rezoning but denial of a motion to approve does not result in
33 a denial.
34 City Attorney Soth stated with a motion to deny,the 60-day clock is no longer running
•
17
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes:
August 22, 2000
• Page 16
1 and there is no question about the disposition of the case.
2 . Motion by Sparks to deny the request of Hillcrest Development to rezone Apache Plaza
3 from C to a PUD designation.
4 Vote: Councilmembers Hodson and Sparks and Mayor Cavanaugh voted aye. Councilmembers Horst
5 and Thuesen voted nay.
6 Motion carried.
7 2. Resolution 00-075,'re PUD Agreement with Hillcrest Development.
8 This item was not acted on.
9 3. Resolution 00-061, re: Amend Tax Increment Financing District#3.
10 This item was not acted on.
11 4. Resolution 00-062, re: Amend Redevelopment Plan for Area#3 and on the
12 Proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District#5.
13 This item was not acted on.
•14 XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
15 City Manager Morrison noted the December 2000 calendar identifying the Truth in Taxation
16 meeting dates and recommended the December 22, 2000 meeting be canceled. He recapped that
17 the meetings will be as follows: December 12 Regular and Truth in Taxation meetings, and
18 December 20 regular meeting. ,.
19 Mornson updated the Council regarding the park grants submitted by BRW on the City's behalf,
20 estimating a response should be received within eight weeks. He noted the summary provided
21 by the Finance Director on how to pay for the park improvements without a tax increase and
22 requested Council input on that information.
23 Mornson reminded all of the September 26 joint meeting with the School Board from 6:00 p.m.
24 to 7:30 pm.-At that meeting,the Council will receive a presentation for redevelopment of the
25 Central_Park by the Park Board Chair, discuss phasing and funding, and reach an agreement on
26 how to proceed. He noted construction on that project is likely to proceed next spring.
27 Mayor Cavanaugh suggested this be.placed on the agenda so Council discussion can occur on
28 City participation with funding.
29 Cavanaugh reported on his meeting with the Sports Booster President to discuss the potential for
30 redevelopment of the Stonehouse comer and impact on their proceeds. He also discussed several
31 other park-related issues in an attempt to open a dialog with the Sports Boosters.
. 1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes.
August 22, 2000
• Page 17
1 XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
2 Thuesen noted the letter dated July 20 that all received from Hennepin Parks stating they are
3 interested in working with the Salvation Army Camp. He advised the Park Commission has a
4 sense of urgency in wanting the Council to explore this issue and place it as an agenda item at
5 the first meeting in September.
6 Thuesen stated it has been brought to his attention that a charter bus with about 50 kids stopped
7 at Watertower Park, noting this park is known outside of St. Anthony.
8 Mayor Cavanaugh stated his understanding that Hennepin Parks would not mind some indication
9 of support from the City Council about what they are doing. He noted the City has no funding
10 for those projects and asked if the Council should adopt a resolution in support of Hennepin
11 Parks projects.
12 Thuesen stated he had indicated he personally supports a Council discussion because he believes
13 it would be a good thing with Hennepin Parks project. He stated he got a sense that Mr. Bryant
14 wanted to know there was a"pulse" on the Council and where they were. He agreed with the
15 Park Commission that this should be addressed soon.
16 Cavanaugh asked Mr. Morrison to talk with Doug Bryant to see what he is looking for from the
•17 Council. ..
18 Horst stated the issue of Apache PIaza_has occupied much of his time but he wants to say those
19 who.cannot remember the past are c6ndemned to repeat it. He stated it is apparent to him that
20 the Council is not wiling to consider•past failures or successes and he believes this decision will
21 haunt the Council for many years, noting the Council did not take the advise of consultants or
22 the Planning Commission who represents the voice of the people. The Council also turned away
23 from a priority set at goal setting. He stated his disappointment, noting the people who put in
24 countless time and hours in putting this project forward. Horst extended his appreciation to them
25 for their work.
26 Cavanaugh reported on a League meeting and the creation of subcommittees related to loss of
27 sales tax to the state and cities due to e-commerce.
28 Cavanaugh commented on the flea market held at the Community Center which was an
29 enormous success.
30 Cavanaugh thanked the Planning Commission and staff for their effort in the Apache Plaza
31 proposal, stating he hoped it was not a venomous, vindictive, or mean spirited issue. He stated
32 he found his callers to be quite constructive, noting there are two sides to the issue and he did not
33 take this vote lightly and voted honestly.
1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 22, 2000
• Page 18
1 XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
2 Motion by Horst to adjourn the meeting at 10:28 p.m.
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4 Respectfully submitted,
5 Carla Wirth
6 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
7
8 Mayor
9 ATTEST:
10 City Clerk
•
•
A
Saint Anthon y e Villa g
DATE: September 12, 2000 . Approval:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors License:
Rite-Way Waterproofing, Lino Lakes, MN
St. Croix Recreation Company, Inc., Stillwater, MN
Heating and Air Conditioning License:
•
Care Air Conditioning and Heating Inc., New Brighton, MN 55112
St. Marie Sheet Metal.Inc., Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
Kalmes Mechanical Inc., Andover, MN
3-D Heating Company, Montrose, MN
20
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VIL
09/06/2000 15: Check: Register GL540R-VO6.27 PAGE
�2
HANK VENDOR CHF_CK# DATE AMOUNT
1
'.s FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING
008216 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 12673 09/13/00 89.42
3� 008666 ALLEGRO 1.2674 09/13/00 51 .50
j 008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 12675 09/13/00 1 , 197 .00
007338 AMERICAN EXPRESS 1.2676 09/13/00 131 .77
005201 AMERICAN STORES 12677 09/1.3/00 20.50
007201 APACHE GROUP 12678 09/13/00 515.29_
.00001 BAF_RTSCHI/PAUL 12679 09/13/00 85.00
_J
008678 BARBAROSSA & SONS, INC . 1.2680 09/13/00 301 ,499.70
;;3! 008404 BASCOM-TURNER INSTRUMENT 1268109/13/00 59 ._60
008153 BOB 'S PERSONAL COFFEE SE 12682-6-9-/13/00 51 .48
008582 CALENDARS 12683 09/13/00 73.35
007386 CASTLE INSPECTION SERVIC 1.2684 09/13/00 6,937.33 _
000655 CLAREY 'S SAFETY EQUIPMEN 12685 09/13/00 155.47
004107 COMPTON 'S COMMERCIAL CLN 12686 09/13/00 3,834.00
007334 CONNELLY INDUST. ELE_CTRO 12687 09/13/00 _2_69.80
1221 008456 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MA 1.2688 09/13/00 427.80
000800 DAVIES WATER EQUIP CO. 12689 09/ 13/00 264.62
.00002 -DELL MARKETING L. P. - _- 3.2690 09/13/00 5, 187.6_3_
005193 DEPT LAP- c4 INDUST CED 12691 09/13/00 50.00
001411 DON HARSTAD CO. , INIC . 12692 09/13/00 917.83
000817 DON'S CAR WASH - 12693 09/_13/00 372.75 -
-��� 005048 DPC INDUSTRIES INC 1.2694 09/13/00 6.00
008647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 12695 09/ 13/00 20.98
001025 G & K SERVICES 3.2696 09/13/00 110.69
001030 G & K SERVICES - ---- 12697 09/13/00 -------- X57.53
i 007114 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT 12698 09/13/00 48.93
- i
001180 GOODIN COMPANY 12699 09/ 3.3/00 63. 49
C?01�,c0 HAWK:INS WATER TREATMENT 1.2700 09/13/00 578.62
TY TREASURE 12701 09/3.3/00 134. 00
005017 HENNEPIN COUN
008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 12702 09/13/00 238.30_
008658 INS`fF UIMP-IVTAI_ F!ESEARCH, I 12703 09%3.3100 63.00
-1 .00001 JEANNIE L.UNDEEN 12704 09/13/00 219.85
007143 LARSON/ROGER A X12705 09/13/00 _ 90.02
1a �I I LM IT 12706 09/13/00 15,023.50
„ 008229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 12707 09/13/00 109.84
008228 MACH MEDICAL INIC . 12708 09/13/00 419.90
11,1 0-7�1�0ACQUE>= Et3llIPhfEI�fT CD 12709 09%13/00 24.73 .
002130 MAMA 12710 09/13/00 16.00
007835 MF_TROCALL 12711 09/13/00 22.67_
002 40 METRO 0LITAN COUhICIL 12712 09/13/00 30, 160.00
002280 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 12713 09/13/00 314.24
005010 MINN CONWAY FIRE & SAFET 12714 09/13/00 42.70
I 0031 MINRRESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 12715 09/13/00 2,978.00
I � 008198 MORNSON/MICHAEL 12716 09/13/00 143.00
j 008686 MUSKA ELECTRIC CO. 12717 09/13/00 1 ,059.75
•s -631-0- NORTH STAR TURF INC 12718 ,09/13/00 113.53
sa 008519 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION C 12719 09/ 13/00 11 ,815.39
007206 NORTHERN 12720 09/13/00 263.84•
ss
�s
21
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM _ _ ST. ANTHONY VIL
09/06/2000 15: Check Register GL540R-VO6.27 PAGE
HANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE _ AMOUNT '_,
FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING
000045 OFFICE DEPO"f . 12721 09/13/00 6. 13
008330 PASCHKE/ROBERT 1.2722 09/13/00 35.02
008594 PETERBILT NORTH _ 127_23 09/13/00 38.93
002820 PETTY CASH-FIRSTAR ST. A 12724 09/13/00 145.01.
008271 PLETSCHER'S GREENHOUSE I 12725 09/13/00 99.53
21 007057 PRAXAIR 12726 09/13/00 18.82
3! 002700 OWEST 12727 09/13/00 8,229.88
008462 RAMSEY COUNTY 1.2728 09/13/00 236,000.00
008473 RAMSEY COUNTY 1272_9_09/09/13/00 50.00
005293 ROAD RUNNER 12730 09/13/00 30.45
008653 ROSEVILLE FIRE GROUND 12731 09/ 13/08 6.00
003350 SEH-RCM 12732 09/13/00 9,81_6.76
008478 SIGN SOLUTIONS 12733 09/13/00 82.05
.00002 SIMONE ENGINEERING INC 12734 09/13/00 101 .05
008483 SKB 127_35 09/13/00 _ 7_0.00_
_i 003460 SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER 1.2736 09/13/00 41 .22
-1 005285 SROGA 'S 12737 09/ 1.3/00 174.00
1i 008665 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO__ 12738 0_9_/_13/00 _ _ 586.71
003490 STRETCHER 'S 12739 89/ 13/00 161 .72
003260 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 12740 09/13/00 572.46
008681 TAMARACK MATERIALS, INC . .12741 _89_/_13/00 7_5.6_6_
008684 TENSON CONSTRUCTION, INC 12742 09/13/00 170,808.04
007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 12743 09/ 1.3/00 480.88
003560 TRACY PRINTING 12744_89/_1_3/00 25_0.25
J 007165 TRACY/TRI F' FUELS 12745 09/ 13%00 6,641. 10
.a 008449 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR 1.2746 09/13/00 93.52
004481 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY_ 12747 09/ 1.3/00 23.38_
I 008336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 12748 09/13/00 369.02
:J 008561 UNITED RENTALS COMPANY 12749 09/ 13/00 28. 12
.00005 UNITED STATES MECHANICAL 12750 09/13/00 368.93_
J;. 008685 UPS_EAT, INC . 12751 09/ 13/00 627.60
:?vl 004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 12752 09/13/00 338.36
3 j _
,3 E=l-RSTAR ST-.- ANTHONY CHECKING 822,900.94
,J
I
H
33 _
�s7
eo
a
Isa
psi -
v
22
iRC FINANCIAL_ SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY-VILLAC
9106/2000 09: Check: Register GL540R-VO6 .27 PAGE
BANK VENDOR CHECKI# DATE AMOUNT
LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008216 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 17213 09/13/00 50 .70
004225 ALL.IANT FOODSERVICE 17214 09/13/00 1 ,497.79
004015 AMERIPRIDE LINEN 17215 09/i.3/OC) 982 .97
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 17216 09/13/00 1 ,509.21
004065 CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO 17217 09/13/00 148 .03
004087 CITY PAGES 17218 09/13/00 234.00
004111 DATA & TEL COMMUNICATION 17219 09/13/00 540 .00
004120 EAGLE WINE CO 17220 09/13/00 919. 1.8
_ 004125_- EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO -- --- ,- --_--1722.1_ 09/_13,/00 -_-.. 64.,459 .4 1
004130 ECCOLAB 17222 09/13/00 149.05
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 17223 09/13/00 8, 170 .96
001030 G & K SERVICES 17224 09/13/00 85.22
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC . 17225 09/13/00 509.00
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 17226 09/13/00 33,541 .36
0 I_
_04201 HEGGIES PIZA 17227 09/13/00 152.65
---- ----008617 HINNENKAMP/WAYNE 17228 09/13/00 63.50
004205 HOME_ JUICE CO 17229 09/13/00 69 .00
004220 JOHNSON BROS. LIQ. 17230_..09/13/00 36,623. 1. 1
004229 LARSON/MICHAEL 17231 09/13/00 334.26
• 001981 LMCIT 17232 09/13/00 3,339.25
004272 METZ BAKING CO 17233 09/ 13/00 149.71
004277 MIDWEST TAPE & RIE{BON 1.7234 09/13/00 500.00
008494 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL_ 17235 09/13/00 150.00
004299 MPL..S. OXYGEN CO. 1.7236 09/13/00 9.60
004334 NORTHEASTER 17237 09/ 13/00 372.60
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 1.7238 09/13/00 98. 16
004360 PHILLIPS. WINE & SPIRITS 17239 09/13/00 10,763.22
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 17240 09/13/00 4,954.20
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 17241 09/13/00 13,948.86
--- ----008597 - R.D. HANSON ASSOC . , INC . 1724.2 09/13/00 1.35..50_ - _----
004420 SIGNAL_ SYSTEMS INC 17243 09/1.3/00 110. 47
004466 SYSCO-MINNESOTA 17244 09/13/00 1 ,675.59
004468_ _TOTAL_ REGISTER SYSTEMS 17245 09/13/00 67.26
008336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 17246 09/13/00 179.98
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 17247 .09/13/00 327.43
008316 WINE COMPANY/THE 17248 09/13/00 4.24.75
- - ----- --- - ----- --------------- -..---- - --- - --. _..- -- - - -- - -- - -----.._ -- - -
008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 17249 09/1.3/00 308.49
003840 ZEP MFG COMPANY 17250 09/13/00 84.88
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 187,639.39 #'
23
BRC FINANCIAL.-SYSTEM ---- ------------__--.- _----- _.._..._-- .. . .... ...... ---- 5T-. -.ANTHONY-_ VILLAC
9/06/2000 11e Check Register GL540R-VO6.27. PAGE
BANK AMOUNT
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING. ACCOUNT
003160 , FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16574 08731/00 . 127756. 16
000670 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 16575 08/31/00 685.00
_ 000055 AETNA LIFE=. & CASUALTY 16576 08/31/00 143 .52
004208 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS. 16577 08/31/00 280.00
008313 MN CHILD SUPPORT PYMT CE 16578 08/31/00 399.49
_004380 PUB-L.IC EMPLOYEE RETIREME 16579 08/31/00 4
1 ,947. 1
004318 NAT FINANCIAL_ INS CO 16580 08/31/00 9 .50
004233 LMCIT % BERKLEY RISK SE 16581 08/31/00 130.44•
007072 ST ANTHONY CHAMBER OF CO 16582 08/31/00 309.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16583 08/31/00 10,000.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16584 08/31/00 15,000 .00
008687 JOEL JOHNSON BAND 16585 08/31/00 4.00.00
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 16586 08/31/00 150.00
.00001 CLASSICS/THE 16587 08/31/00 1 ,530.00
.00002 CARDSERVICF_ INTERNATIONA 16588 08/31/00 1 ,695.75
000710 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANC 16589 08/31/00 4.8.95
003160 FIRS-FAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16590 08/31/00 81000 . 00
00:3160_ FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16591 08/31/00 15,000.00
LUnIDGF2F_N/MAT THEW H. 1659.2 08/'31/00 75.00
• 008649 JAM BAND/THE : 16593 08/.31/00 370.00
008643 THIRD POWER 16594 08/31/00 275.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16595 08/31/00 17,518.98
000670 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 16596 08/31 /00 695.00
000055 AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY 16597 08/31/00 143.52
004208 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 16598 08/31/00 280.00
008313 MN CHILD SUPPORT PYMT CE 16599 08/31/00 4.03.95
004380 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREME 16600 08/31/00 2,015. 22
000710 PRUDENTIAL L_.IFE INSURAfNIC 16602 08/31/00 4-0. 40
008289 NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 16603 08/31/00 36.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16604 08/31/00 15,000.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16605 0b- '--- 0 6,000.00
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 16606 08/31/00 150.00
.00003 RESONATORS/THE 1660709/31/00 350.00
0044.01 ST.A.LIQUOR #1 PC 16608. 08/31/00 190.37
002850 MEDICA CHOICE 16609 08/31/00 3,397.05
004•.085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 16610 08/31/00 50, 000.00
003160 FIkEMR ST ANTHONY BANK 16611 08/31/00 6,000.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK 16612 08/31/00 15,000.,00
008649 JAM BAND/THE 16613 08/31/00 _ 370.00
004250 Ll1NDGFEhI%MATTFIEW H. 1661.4 08/31/00 75.00
008532 STEINWORTH/JIM 16615 08%31/00 200.00
003160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK _ 16616 08/_31/00 _ _1.5,0_00_.00
0(83160 FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY E�ANK bb17 08%31/00 8,000.00
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 210,060.71
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. Resolution 00-067 and 00-068
24
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 1, 2000
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSED LEVY
By September 15, 2000 each "taxing authority" must adopt a proposed budget for
payable 2001 and certify a proposed property tax levy to the County Auditor.
On July 25th the City Council held a work session to discuss the proposed budget.
Based on those discussions, staff adjusted the budget to reflect a line item.for Budget
Reserves of$112,000 and keep the levy at $1,763,475. To accomplish this, most
budgets were adjusted downward and prepared by taking the 1999 actuals and adding a
3% increase for 2000 and another 3% for 2001.
The proposed increase in.the levy is as follows:
2000 Levy $1,646,970
Add:
Inflationary increase 2.92% $ 48,130
Village Fest contribution $ 5,000
Park Maintenance Employee $ 26,900
Civil Defense Increase $ 2,000
Fire Protection Increase 34,475
2001 Levy $1,763,475 (7.07%)
The next step in the process is to calculate the impact the levy increase has on the tax
rate and ultimately St. Anthony taxpayers. To determine the tax rate, the levy (less
fiscal disparities) is divided by the total tax capacity or valuation of the City. The
information should be available from Hennepin County between September 20' and
October 1".
In preparing last year's calculation, the tax rate dropped 1.852% due to a $23,570
increase in Fiscal Disparities and a 6.7% increase in St. Anthony's Total Tax Capacity
($4,820,500 to $5,141,361). The net result was that taxes on a property valued at
$118,000 in 1999 (average valuation in `99) with a valuation increase to $125,000
• (average valuation in 2000) remained the same. For properties with no valuation
increase, property taxes went down.
25
• It is too early to predict the impact of the levy, however, based on the trend that our
valuation numbers are increasing, it is assumed that most of the proposed levy increase
will be offset by increased city valuation.
Another factor that has.impacted property taxes has been the State mandated changes to
the Class Rates. The effect of these changes has been a gradual shift of the tax burden
from commercial/industrial properties to residential properties. For year 2001, there
are no changes to the Class Rates, with the exception of a special classification for
airport properties.
Recommendation:
In compliance with the Truth in Taxation Act, Council approve resolution#00-067,
setting a proposed tax levy and budget for 2001; setting December 11`x, 2000 as the
intital hearing date and a reconvening date of December 20' to discuss and adopt a final
property tax levy and budget.
•
Original Downsized Budget Submitted by Department Heads 26
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
REVENUES .1998 1999 2000 2001
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Property Taxes $1,611,779 $1,623,024 $1,647,970 $1,766,475 7.19%
Licenses $6,208 $8,863 $10,000 $10,550 5.50%
Permits $90,637 $101,593 $85,400 $99,500 16.51%
Intergovernmental Revenue $678,207 $780,695 $717,757 $738,918 2.95%
Contract Revenue (Lauderdale/Falcon Heights) $504,310 $529,426 $5501173 $569,432 3.50%
Charges for Service(Fines) $88,389 $100,647 $100,000 $100,000 0.00%
Miscellaneous Revenues $121,131 $164,565 $76,150 $135,000 . 77.28%
Transfers 8E Miscellaneous Revenues $65.000 $86,3440. $340,000 $100,000 -70.59%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL REVENUES $3.164,661 $3.395,153 $3.527,450 $3„$19,875 -0.21%
EXPENDITURES 1998 1999 2000 2001
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Mayor/City Council $49,874 $51,349 $58,000 $56,000 -3.45%
Public/Intergovernmental Relations $13,052 $19,197 $17,450 $19,975 14.47%
Cable Franchise $14,906 $17,667 $20,500 $20,900 1.95%
General Management $86,137 $84,705 $114,400 $100,875 -11.82%
Elections. $15,073 $14,213 $22,800 $19,200 -15.79%
• Finance, Insurance/Accounting $190,818 $200,145 $271,700 $238,100 -12.37%
Finance,Assessing $32,397 $34,395,. $37,000 . $37,000 0.00%
Legal $45,567 $55,062 $59,800 $58,800 1.67%
Engineering, Planning/Zoning $4,338 $2,488 $9,100 $5,375 -40.93%
City Building $91,620 $98,671 $98,900 $105,300 6.47%
Civil Defense/Emergency Management $35,206 $36,162 $40,900 $46,400 13.45%
Police Protection $807,416 $919,028 $1,010,700 $996,000 -1.45%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights Contracts $421,844 $437,871 $474,300 $491,200 3.56%
Fire Protection $463,000 $465,164 $494,300 $548,400 10.94%
Inspections, Building/Plumbing/Heating/Health $63,941 $65,830 $66,300 $71,100 7.24%
Animal Control $3,213 $3,151 $5,700 $4,000 -29.82%
Public Works $328,919 $338,758 $420,700 $379,800 -9.72%
Public Works,Maintenance/Repair Equipment $81,899 $97,828 $117,400 $112,500 -4.17%
Tree and Weed Care $21,661 $21,679 $30,700 $25,950 -15.47%
Parks $59,657 $69,624 $81,800 $108,000 32.03%
Transfers to Other Funds $260,972 $197,697 $75,000 $75,000 0.00%
Other-Expenditures (Approved by Council) $Q $43,008 $Q $4
GENERAL FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3.091„4.10 $3,273,692 $3.527,450 $3.519,875 -0.21%
FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $711,294 $870,708 $870,708 $870,708
•
1999 Actuals + 3% for 2000 + 3% for 2001 27
(Adds Budget Reserve Line)
• GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
REVENUES 1998. 1999 2000
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Property Taxes $1,611,779 $1,623,024 $1,647,970 $1,766,475 7.19%
Licenses $6,208 $8,863 $10,000 $10,550 5.50%
Permits $90,637 $101,593 $85,400 $99,500 16.51%
Intergovernmental Revenue $678,207 $780,695 $717,757 $731,768 1.95%
Contract Revenue (Lauderdale/Falcon Heights) $504,310 $529,426 $550,173 $569,432 3.50%
Charges for Service (Fines) $88,389 $100,647 $100,000 $100,000 0.00%
Miscellaneous Revenues $121,131 $164,565 $76,150 $142,150 86.67%
Transfers 8E Miscellaneous Revenues $65,000 $86,340 $340,000 $100,000 -70.59%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL REVENUES $3.165,661 $3.395,153 $3,527,450 $3,519,875 -0.21%
EXPENDITURES 1998 1999 2000 2001
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Mayor/City Council $49,874 $51,349 $58,000 $53,000 -8.62%
Public/Intergovernmental Relations $13,052 $19,197 $17,450 $19,500 11.75%
Cable Franchise $14,906 $17,667 $20,500 $18,000 -12.20%
General Management $86,137 $84,705 $114,400 $93,000 -18.71%
Elections $15,073 $14,213 $22,800 $16,400 -28.07%
Finance;Insurance/Accounting $190,818 $200,145 $271,700 $212,400 -21.83%
Finance,Assessing $32,397 $34,395 $37,000 $36,500 -1.35%
Legal $45,567 $55,062 $59,800 $58,400 -134%
Engineering,Planning/Zoning $4,338 $2,488 $9,100 $2,700 -70.33%
City Building $91,620 $98,671 $98,900 $104,600 5.76%
Civil Defense/Emergency Management $35,206 $36,162 $40,900 $40,400 -1.22%
Police Protection $807,416 $919,028 $1,010,700 $983,600 -2.68%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights Contracts $421,844 $437,871 $474,300 $491,200 3.56%
Fire Protection $463,000 $465,164 $494,300 $527,975 6.81%
Inspections, Building/Plumbing/Heating/Health $63,941 $65,830 $66,300 $69,800 5.28% .
Animal Control $3,213 $3,151 $5,700 $3,400 -40.35%
Public Works $328,919 $338,758 $420,700 $367,800 -12.57%
Public Works,Maintenance/Repair Equipment $81,899 $97,828 $117,400 $103,700 -11.67%
Tree and Weed Care $21,661 $21,679 $30,700 $25,400 -17.26%
Parks $59,657 $69,624 $81,800 $105,100 28.48%
Transfers to Other Funds $260,972 $197,697 $75,000 $75,000 0.00%
Budget Reserves $0 $0 $0 $112,000 100.00%
Other Expenditures (Approved by Council) $Q $43,008 $Q $Q
GENERAL FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,091,510 $3,273,692 $3,527,450 $3,519,875 -0.21%
FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $711,294 $870,708 $870,708 $982,708
•
NA
UUL; ,.i I Ib r
tj U00
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
I.S.D. Special Hennepin
#282 Taxing County
Districts
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
ST. ANTHONY Ramsey Special I .S.D.
County Taxing #282
D-i-s-trr4c-t
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Hennepin
and Ramsey ST. ANTHONY
Counties
24 25 26 Council 27 28 29 30
Meeting
Cancelled
31
29
• CITY OF ST ANTHONY
RESOLUTION #00-067
A RESOLUTION SETTING THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PROPOSED 2001 TAX LEVY
AND BUDGET IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRUTH IN TAXATION ACT
WHEREAS, the Truth in Taxation Law requires that the City of St. Anthony provide
Hennepin and Ramsey Counties with a proposed certified 2001 tax levy
and budget; and
WHEREAS, the information required for the City Council to make a definitive tax levy
cannot be determined until the City of St. Anthony holds its public hearings;
and
WHEREAS, the furnishing of this proposed tax levy and budget is made contingent upon any
revisions being allowed if the current law is modified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1) The collectible 2001 proposed property tax levy is:
Property Tax Levy $2,112,768
Less: H.A.C.A. ( 349,293)
Proposed General Fund Levy $1,763,475
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Levy $ 20,000
Less: H.A.C.A. ( 4,597)
Proposed Housing and Redevelopment Authority Levy $ 15,403
Special Assessment/Road Improvements $ 272,189
Total 2001 Proposed Tax Levy $2,051,067
2) The 2001 General Fund Proposed Budget totals $3,519,875
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that:
1) The hearing date for discussion of the 2001 proposed levy and budget is set at
• December 11, 2000, 7:00 P.M. in its Council Chambers and if necessary be
reconvened on December 20, 2000, 7:00 P.M. in its Council Chambers.
30
2) The subsequent hearing date to adopt the City's final property tax levy and budget
shall be announced prior to completion of its December 11, 2000 hearing, or if
necessary, prior to its completion of the December 20, 2000 reconvened hearing.
Adopted this day of , 2000
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 5, 2000
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: LEVY CERTIFICATON/TAX RATE PUBLIC HEARING
A new law requires that all cities over 500 population to pass a resolution if the levy for
the subsequent year will result in a tax rate increase. Under the law, the City Council
must adopt a resolution at a public hearing if its levy will result in an increase in the tax
rate over the base line tax rate. Essentially, a base line tax rate is computed based on
the prior year's levy and the current year tax base.
The intent of the law is to provide the public with added information about the levy
process. Specifically, under the current calculation methods used, a city could
increase its levy or increase spending, yet experience a tax rate decrease due to an
increase in their Total Tax Capacity (valuation increasing). Citizens could incorrectly
assume that a reduction in their "city taxes" equals no increase in spending.
For the budget year 2000 St. Anthony was a prime example of what the intent of the
law was to accomplish. Last year's increase in the levy was offset in a $323,974
(6.67%) increase in the city's Total Tax Capacity causing a (1.852%) decrease in the
tax rate. The impact on a $125,000 home (increased valuation from $118,000) was the
"city portion" of their property taxes remained the same.
For budget year 2001, the budget reflects a $116,505 increase in the levy. To compare
St. Anthony's levy increase to other communities, staff conducted a levy survey (see
attached). The analysis indicates that in comparing percentages, St. Anthony is in line
with our neighboring communities and of the 21 communities surveyed, St. Anthony is
in the lower half of the results. The majority of the Finance Directors surveyed
indicated that most of their levy increase would be offset by increased valuation.
Hennepin County indicates that the calculation of the impact is still a couple of weeks
away. The trend of higher valuations due to market conditions should contribute to
another increase in St. Anthony's Total Tax Capacity for budget year 2001. It is likely
that most of the levy increase of the budget will be offset by a reduced tax rate
Recommendation:
• To comply with the State law (Minn. State 204b.135, Subdivision 5), Council pass
resolution #00-068 indicating its intention to increase the levy.
32
• Levy Survey:
Percentage
C Increase
New Hope 29.50% eighboring Communities
Moundsview 18.00% Moundsview 18.00%
New Brighton 17.00% New Brighton 17.00%
Maplewood 16.60% Columbia Heights 10.00%
Lino Lakes 13.08% Roseville 7.76%
Coon Rapids 11.48% St. Anthony 7.07%
Andover 11.00% Shoreview 6.30%
Columbia Heights 10.00% Fridley 5.00%
Rosemount 8.95%
Burnsville 8.50%
Robbinsdale 8.50%
Roseville 7.76%
St. Anthony 7.07% .
• Brooklyn Park 6.40%
Shoreview 6.30%
Hopkins 6.00%
Bloomington 6.00%
Edina 5.77%
Fridley 5.00%
Minnetonka 4.00%
Plymouth 3.87%
Richfield 2.97%
t
33
• CITY OF ST ANTHONY
RESOLUTION #00-068
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TAX RATE INCREASE FOR THE
2000 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE 2000
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, Counties of Hennepin and
Ramsey, Minnesota, that the County Auditor is authorized to fix a property tax rate for taxes
payable in the year 2001 that is higher than the tax rate calculated pursuant to Minnesota Statues
§204B.135 for the City taxes levied in 2000, collectible in 2001.
Adoption of this resolution does not prohibit the City from certifying a final levy that will result
in no tax rate increase or a tax rate decrease.
The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County
Auditors of Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Minnesota.
Adopted this day of. , 2000
•
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL,
A. Frontline Church
B. Resolution 00-065
C. Resolution 00-078
D. Resolution 00-079
E. Funding option for Central Park.
•
34
0
July 23, 2000
Frontline Church
and Outreach Center
Michael Morrison '
City Manager
St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699
Dear Michael,
We are asking that you would remove our request (for adding a Church for a
conditional use in a Commercial District) from the agenda of the City
Council meeting on July 25, 2000. We need more time to confer with
counsel regarding the findings of the Planning Commission.
• Therefore, we are requesting the application for Frontline Church &
Outreach Center to be considered at the Council Meeting on September 12,
2000. Thank you very much for your help in this matter. If you have any
questions or comments, please call me at (651) 636-2594.
FSincly
A
g0
Senior Pastor
Frontline Church&Outreach Center
2819 Hamline Avenue.Roseville MN 55113
651.636.2594
Frontline Midway Church&Outreach Center
1571 University Avenue.St Paul MN 55104
651.659.0151
MEMORANDUM 35
DATE: 7/11/00 MEETING DATE: 7/18/00
TO: Planning Commission /
FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom 1. r�
RE: Public Hearing. Frontline Church and Outreach Center. Petition for
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance.
Pastor Bill Arrigoni, representing the Frontline Church and Outreach Center, is asking the City to consider
adding a "Church" as a conditional use in a commercial district. Presently "Churches" are a permitted
conditional use in all R1, R2, R3, and R4 districts citywide. If this petition is approved/accepted, then
"Churches" will also be a permitted conditional use in "C" districts citywide.
The Frontline Church has entered into a purchase agreement for the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace
in the City of St. Anthony. If this petition is approved, the Frontline Church will subsequently submit an
"Application for Conditional Use Permit."
Staff Recommendation:A completed "Petition.for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance" has been received by the
City. Staff recommends the Commission either approves or denies the petition. If approved, then Staff will
draft the necessary Ordinance in preparation for the next City Council meeting.
• Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
July 18, 2000
• Page 2
1 Commission meeting for August 1, 2000.
2 Motion carried unanimously.
3 V. NEW APPLICATIONS/PUBLIC HEARINGS.
4 1. Public Hearing. Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance (Frontline Church).
5 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m., and requested a report from Staff.
6 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reported that Pastor Bill Arrigoni, representing the
7 Frontline Church and Outreach Center, is asking the City to consider adding a Church as a
8 conditional use in a commercial district. Presently, Churches are a permitted conditional use in
9 all R1, R2, R3, and R4 districts citywide. If this petition were approved,then Churches would
10 also be a permitted conditional use in "C" districts citywide.
11 Mr. Isom continued by stating that the Frontline Church has entered into a purchase agreement
12 for the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace in the City of St. Anthony. If the petition would
13 be approved, the Frontline Church would subsequently submit an Application for Conditional
14 Use.
15 Mr. Isom stated that the City has received a completed Petition for Amendment to Zoning
.06 Ordinance. Staff recommends that the Commission either approve or deny the petition. If
7 approved,then Staff would prepare the necessary Ordinance in preparation for the next City
18 Council meeting.
19 Chair Bergstrom introduced Pastor Bill Arrigoni and invited him to address the Commission.
20 Mr. Arrigoni noted that the Church is currently located at a different site, but would like to
21 relocate to St. Anthony and is interested in purchasing the building at 2654 Kenzie Terrace. This
22 process would allow for the Church to grow and to become a part of the community in St.
23 Anthony. Mr. Arrigoni stated that the Church has much to offer the community and provides
24 ministry to all ages. The heart of the Church, Mr. Arrigoni stated, is to help people and become
25 a positive icon within the community.
26 Mr. Arrigoni said that he has been working with the architect and made sure that the.Church
27 could offer the City an easement to allow for a walking path that would coincide with the City's
28 plans for green space. This was incorporated into the plans after the Concept Review with the
29 Planning Commission in June 2000. Mr. Arrigoni noted that the walking path would be four feet
30 wide. Additionally,the parking would be skirted around to the rear of the building to allow for
31 better traffic flow.
32 Chair Bergstrom invited input from the audience, and hearing none, closed the Public Hearing at
33 7:23 p.m. Bergstrom requested comments from the Commissioners.
04 Bergstrom stated that he has reservations about any noncommercial use in that district. Melsha
35 stated that this is an issue that does not have anything to do with the Frontline Church,but is
36 more of a public policy issue.
37
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
July 18, 2000
• Page 3
1 Stille noted that it is painful to deny the request,but stated that he would like to clarify that the
2 City has a specific policy and although the Church would be an excellent addition to the
3 community, allowing a noncommercial use would change the City's policy and have an affect on
4 similar future issues.
5 Tillmann echoed Stille's comments and stated that to change the City's policy would not be
6 acceptable.
7 Thomas noted that if the Commission allowed this use, they would be opening up the policy
8 citywide. In other words,the issue could present future problems if the policy was changed.
9 However, he would encourage the Church to continue working with Staff, and he would direct
10 Staff to work in conjunction with the Church to find alternative parcels for their relocation to St.
11 Anthony. Thomas noted that,unfortunately, the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace would
12 not be the correct site for the Church and felt that the Commission did not have many options.
13 Hatch commented that the Comprehensive Plan wished for the property in that area to be
14 commercial. Plus,the fact that City would need the tax base that would come from a
15 commercial building in order to keep the community as it is.
16 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Stille,that the Petition for Amendment to the Zoning
•17 Ordinance-is denied due to the following findings of fact:.
18 1. Current permitted uses for that area are commercial and do not include Churches;
19 2. The City has put forth a significant amount of energy into re-energizing the St. Anthony
20 Shopping Center and would like to continue along the same path;
21 3. The City does not allow non-commercial uses in the St. Anthony Shopping Center;
22 4. The Church would not directly support other commercial entities in the District;
23 5. The conversion of taxable property to nontaxable property would remove a high tax-
. .24 generating income for the City;
25 6. The changed zoning would have an affect on all commercial properties in the City, which
26 would be undesirable for all commercial uses.
27 Motion carried unanimously.
28 Bergstrom noted that Pastor Arrigoni had a fine organization within the Church and encouraged
29 him to work with Staff in finding an alternative location.,
•30 He reminded Mr. Arrigoni that this issue would be before the City Council on Tuesday, July 25,
31 2000, and he encouraged him to be present.
32 2. Public Hearing Application for Conditional Use Permit(Nadi and Roger Abou-Mourad)
3
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing
on Tuesday, July 18, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, for the following
purpose:
Applicant: Frontline Church, 2819 Hamline Avenue, Roseville
• Address: for 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Request: Petition for amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance to
add "Churches" to the list of conditional uses in a
Commercial district (C).
Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at
said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the
Management Assistant 789-8881. Auxiliary aids are available upon request at
least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City.Clerk at 789-8881 to make
arrangements.
Spencer Isom
Assistant City Manager
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
July 5, 2000
39
Date:
Fee: $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance
Applicant: r
Address:�2g 1°� �a^.�% 1 �, �ose� �`e , W11) Phone: (.S1
55113
Request for change regarding: (check appropriate item(s))
Restrictions upon buildings, structures, or amenities
Permitted uses
Conditional uses
Affected zoning district:4 k c a p s a's A coL—4 o I (Z 4ASA'
Proposed change(s) and reason(s) therefor: LA cn eL r 0.; �'l o a r c—
Q c e C o
ka"�' 16 3_�' o 3 2y:,j
n
y
(use additional sheet, if necessary)
•
ev
Signature of pplic
4®
•
June 29, 2000 Frontline Church
and Outreach Center
Spencer Isom
Assistant City Manager
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699
Dear Spencer,
We are submitting this letter in preparation for concept review and public hearing. Frontline
Church& Outreach Center has signed a purchase agreement for the property located at 2654
Kenzie Terrace in St. Anthony Village. We are aware that it is zoned commercial and requires a
petition for amendment to zoning ordinance and permit for conditional use in a commercial
district for the building to be used as a church. If the City Council would be so gracious as to
accept us in to the community of St. Anthony, we would like to use the facility for the purpose of
church assembly on the main floor and we would lease the.basement level to a storage company.
• We established this church in March of 1994 and we have been leasing from Krause Anderson at
the Hamline Shopping Center for over five years. It has always been our desire to remain close
to the heart of the city since so many churches have moved out into the suburbs because of the
necessity growth brings. This facility would work well for us and we feel that we could be a
very positive addition to your fine community.
Our plans for this facility would be to make a complete renovation on the interior and exterior
before occupancy would take place. Our goal is to close November 1, 2000 and move in on
February 1, 2001. We will submit plans for new sidewalks,handicap ramp,parking lot
resurfacing, new signage, and beautiful landscaping that will compliment the St. Anthony
"Green-space Plan." We plan to spend approximately$75,0001on the exterior and $180,000 on
the interior. .
I would like to thank you and the Committee Members for the time and consideration that you
afforded us at the Planning Committee meeting on June 20, 2000. Enclosed you will find more
detailed information on our organization and ourplans. Thank you once again for your
consideration.
Sincerely,
• Bill Arrigoni, for Frontline Church&Outreach Center
2819 Hamline Avenue.Roseville MN 55113
Frontline Church & Outreach Center 651.636.2594
Frontline Midway Church&Outreach Center
1571 University Avenue.5t Paul MN 55104
651.659.0151
41
Narrative
I. Profile of Frontline Church
Senior Pastor: Bill Arrigoni graduate of Rhema Bible Training Center Tulsa, OK,
licensed and ordained with World Revival Network Kansas City, MO. Pastor for six
years, associate youth Pastor at Living Word Christian Center Brooklyn Park five years.
Staff: Two full-time and six part-time employees
Established: March Is' 1994
Membership: 150 people(45 families)
Socioeconomic: Primarily middle to upper middle class, racially mixed,per capita
giving is 50% above national average.
Demographic: Majority of adults 25-60, married with 3 children, youth group of 25,
residing in suburbs (Maplewood, Blaine, Ham Lake, Hastings, Champlin, Brooklyn Park,
• Ramsey, Savage, Woodbury).
Subsequent Establishments: We established Frontline Midway Church and Outreach
Center on University Avenue in St. Paul January of 1999. This Outreach Center was
established as a church and a place of humanitarian activity for our entire organization.
Many of those whom we have helped are now faithful members of our Midway church.
II. Activities on site at 2654 Kenzie Terrace
General Services: Fridays at 7:00 pm& Sundays at 10:00 am
We would use this facility for church assembly, this would include music in the main
sanctuary where adults would assemble followed by a Biblical message. We
simultaneously provide ministry for all other ages (infants, toddlers, children,pre-teens,
and teens) in different meeting rooms throughout the facility.
Prayer Services: Thursdays at 7:00 pm
The whole congregation assembles together in the main sanctuary for corporate prayer
where we pray for our cities, nation, leaders as well as prayer requests from anyone in the
community.
•
1
42
Youth Meetings (ages 13-18): Friday evenings at 7:00 and one Saturday per
• month at 7:00 pm
Youth participate in worship and then hear a gospel message.
Vacation Bible School: Usually in June or August for ages 7-12
Children are invited from the community as well as our church and they join many fun
Bible oriented activities which teach them about God and how to live right. This is a five
day program which inspires children to follow the Lord and live godly lives.
Daily: Office hours are from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm
We normally staff the church offices Monday through Friday with two to three people
throughout the day to take care of general church business as well as ministry work.
III. Community Outreaches
Picnics:
We would like to do concerts in the park if permissible as well as open house picnics for
the Village of St. Anthony residents.
Thanksgiving & Christmas:
• We have had the privilege to spread good will to those in need on these special Holidays
by giving them plentiful food baskets which have been provided by our church,
community businesses and other churches. Last year we distributed 200 food baskets at
Thanksgiving and Christmas. We were also a Toys For Tots distributor at Christmas
time for families in need, many of which were local residents.
Helping Hands:
This ministry is somewhat of a spiritual S.W.A.T. Team. When someone in our
community informs us that they need any kind of help, spiritual or practical (food,
transportation, shelter, clothing, ect.) our team springs into action immediately to help
and to pray with people whether or not they have even visited our church. Last year this
ministry spent over,$7000.00 in meeting these.types of needs throughout Roseville and
St. Paul, yet we plan to further expand this ministry. This type of work usually takes
place at the recipient's home or apartment, hospitals and nursing homes.
Community Involvement:
We are very interested in getting involved in community events since we consider
community relations to be a very important part of our purpose as a church.
•
2
43
IV. Organizational Vision
Church Planting:
We plan to continue to plant more new churches in areas where they needed_throughout
the Twin City Metropolitan area. Our motto is "Bring the church to the people".
Evangelistic:
We have been very active in making a difference in our communities in which we have
been located. It is not our goal to transplant people but as I said"bring the church to the
people"to those who need or want a church. We do not believe in a style of outreach
which"outreaches its welcome". We seem to have plenty of God's work coming to.us
and we simply respond. Our outreaches in St. Paul have brought us before thugs, drug
addicts, alcoholics,prostitutes and some very moral people. We have worked with other
ministries,one of which is a ministry to prostitutes in St. Paul (Breaking Free) and we
have seen some phenomenal results.
Our ministry in St. Anthony Village will take on a flavor and form of its own, because we
will simply respond to the needs of this community. Frontline has no interest in drawing
any of those whom we have and are helping in the Midway area to the St. Anthony
Village. We simply would like to have the opportunity to be accepted into this great
community where we can take our place as a beacon for hope and good for all to see.
• Missions:
We have been heavily involved in oversees missions work. We have brought three teams
to India during the last fifteen months, we ministered to children, pastors, and thousands
of people. The mission activities consisted of conducting meeting and distributing to the
needs of the people. We intend to continue to maintain and increase our missionary
activities.
Stated Purpose:
The purpose of the church as we see it, is to first minister to the spiritual and if necessary
physical needs of the membership, to bring them to a place of maturity in Christ Jesus.
Secondly we must provide the inspiration, training, and means to reach out to others.
This is the heart of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
•
3
44
• V. Site Plan
Storm Water retention and drainage:
Although we will be doing quite extensive work on the exterior of the building we will.
not be affecting the grade'of the lot. The site has very adequate storm sewer access at the
south side of the property as indicated on the site plan. The property has a steep grade
which will carry water swiftly to the storm sewer. The north side of the lot drains towards
Kenzie Terrace. We have no intention of introducing any new elements which would
encumber the flow of drainage water.
Demolition:
We intend to remove the following items from the property.
1. Sign and pole near front entrance.
2. Sign pole at north west corner of building
3. Sign and pole at southwest corner near the rear of site.
4. Awning above front entrance.
Materials:
1. New awning made of canvas (color yet to be determined)
2. Parking lot resurfaced in asphalt.
3. Fence at rear southwest wood split rail.
4. Dumpster enclosure brown treated wood with colored fence gate.
5. Signage brick base identical to brick on front of building, letters metal
(color to be determined). Logo Flame & Sword sculpted metal.
6. Diamond shaped accents to soldier course in brickwork, metal (color
to be determined).
7. Additional brickwork on northwest corner of building brick identical
to existing on front.
8. Sidewalks made of cement.
9. Landscaping walls on various planting beds constructed of landscaping
block in Buff color matching that in the rear of the property on truck
ramp.
10. Foliage for planting beds will be a variety of shrubs-plants flowers and
ornamental trees which will blend nicely with the existing landscaping
of adjacent properties and the St. Anthony"Green-space Plan".
Easements:
Frontline Church is willing to offer the city of St. Anthony an easement for a four-foot
walking path running down the westerly side of the property adjacent to the apartment
building.
4
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PL
5
COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PURCDASE AGREEMENT
• Date: mAY 30 2000
RECEIVED OF Frontline Church and Outreach Center the sum of one thousand 654 Kenzie•Terrace
DOLLARS as earnest money and.in part payment for the purchase of property
situated in the County of Hennepin; State of Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lot 002 Block
002 St. Anthon Villa P C Adds No. 1 Pro wD• Oe923pundersigned93400ay
together with the following personal property: NIA all of property
rtY
sold to the Buyer for the sum of. Six hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars ($625.000.00)DOLLARS,
which the Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: earnest money herein paid as 1$ ,900.00 upon lease
signature and 9� ,000.040 ,upon removal of contingency#3 (See Addendum#1) as
mber IL
additibnal earnest money and $57,000.00, cash on vx bcfoie S-121to __ ..001, the date of closing and the
balance of$558,000.00 by financing as shown on the attached
1. DEEDlMARKETABLE TITLE: Subject to performance by the Buyer, the Seller agrees to execute
and deliver a general/marketahle Warranty Deed conveying marketable title to said premises subject
only to the following exceptions: (a) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal
regulations. (b) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of the premises without effective forfeiture
provision. (c) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. (d) Utility and
drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements. (e) Rights of tenants as follows:
"See Attached Addendum
• 2. REAL ESTATE TAXES. Real cstatc taxes duc and payable in the year,of closing shall be prorated
between Seller and Buyer on a calendar year basis to the actual date of closing unless otherwise provided
in this Agreement. Real estate taxes payable in the years prior to closing shall be paid by Seller. Real
estate taxes payable in the years subsequent to closing shall be paid by Buyer.
3. SP C7 A L -1-ce R!/��LC�N TTIC�.�(�F�s 'L rtes'R�f�vTl�°rIGT*D SELLER SE6kLL -AS OF�1 .
THE DANE GLOSIENs:ftD'E LE.M1e'�77�A LL PAY- Of' Lhs-dat�-Ar-6109iRg 11 ..71 ••�---:•��,i.
[S 7k,@ eo -one.] BUV A I I— PROR s rE SELLE S 7 1 PAY Y /olrNrPRO A TL'T x2 A C IS ON
special assessme
by the Gty�eil or-other-govemmeRW assessing –au-Nuesilie
1/2 w. — assessments
Of th
ic
• 4. PRORATIONS. All items customarily prorated and adjusted in connection with the closing of the sale
of the property herein including but not limited to rents, operating expenses, interest on any debt
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI Ps .: 46
COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PURCHASE:AGREEMENT
• 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Page 2 of 5
assumed by Buyer, shall be prorated as of the date of closing. It shall be assumed that the Buyer will
own the property for the entire date of.the closing.
5. DAMAGES TO REAL PROPERTY. If there is any loss or damage to the property between the date
hereof acid the date of closing, for any reason, the rick of loss shall be on the Seller. If the property is
destroyed or substantially damaged before the closing, this Purchase Agreement shall become null and
void, at Buyer's option. Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Purchase Agreement within 30 days
after Seller notifies Buyer of such damage. Upon said termination, the earnest money shall be refunded
to Buyer and Buyer and Seller agree to sign a cancellation of Purchase Agreement.
6. EXAMINATION OF TITLE. Within a reasonable time after acceptance of this Agreement, Seller
shall furnish Buyer with an Abstract of Title or a Registered propel-ty Abstract ccrtified to date including
proper searches covering bankruptcies and State and Federal judgments, liens and levied and pending
special assessments. Duyer shall bave 10 business days after receipt of the Abstract of Title or
Registered Property Abstract either to have Buyer's attorney examine the title and provide Seller with
written objections or, at Buyers own expense, to make an application for a title insurance policy and
notify Seller of the application. Buyer shall have 10 business days after receipt of the commitment for
title insurance to provide seller with a copy of the commitment and written objections. Buyer shall be
deemed to have waived any title objections not made within the applicable 10-day period set forth
above, except that this shall not operate as a waiver of Seller's covenant to deliver a .Warranty Deed,
• unless a Warranty Deed is not specified above. if any objection is so made, Seller shall have 10 business
days from receipt of Buyer's written title objections to notify Buyer of Seller's intention to make title
marketable within 120 days fiuiu Seller's receipt of such written objcction. If notice is given,payments
hereunder required shall be postponed pending correction of title, but upon correction of title and within
10 days after written notice to Buyer the parties shall perform this Purchase Agreement according to its
terms. If no such notice is given or if notice is given but title is not corrected within the tixne provided
forth, this Purchase Agreement shall be null and void, at option of Buyer; neither party shall be liable for
damages hereunder to the other and earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer; Buyer and Seller agree to
sign cancellation of Purchase Agreement. If title to the property to be found marketable or be so made
within said time, and Buyer shall default in any of the agreements and continue in default for a period of
10 days. Then and in that case the Seller may terminate this contract and on such termination all the
payments trade upon this contract shall be retained by Seller as liquiddtW tlaniales, time Whig of the
essence. This provision shall not deprive either party of the right to enforce the specific performance of
this contract provided this contract has not been terminated and provided action to enforce such specific
performance shall be commenced within six months after such right of action shall arise.
7. POSSESSION.Seller shall deliver possession of the property on the date of closing.
8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. See attached addendum.
9. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE FOR ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS CONTRACT.
10. WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There are no wells. BUYER AND SELLER INITIAL:
• Buyer(s) Seller(s)
11. ADDENDA.Attached are (2)addenda,which are made a part of this Agreement.
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI R /fl 7
COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT
0 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Page 3 of 5
122 IISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:
(a) Survival. All of the warranties, representations, and covenants of this Agreement shall survive and be
ClLfoiccable after the closing.
(b) Entire Agreement, Modification. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the
parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the property.
There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement and no waiver of ally of its terms will be
effective unless in a writing executed by the parties.
(c) Successors uud Assigns. If this Agreement is assigned, all provisions of this Agreement shall be binding
on successors and assigns.
13. ACCEPTANCE DEADLINE.This offer to purchase,unless accepted sooner, shall be null and void at 11:59 PM
June 5.2400 and in such event all earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer.
NOTICE
Jim Stimmler Kraus-Anderson Realty Represents Seller
(Agent) (Company Name)
Represents
(Agent) (Cuuitnuly Mum)
•
THIS IS A LEGALLY]BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD,SEEK COMPETENT ADVICE.
Dated: �/ /� . Dated-
SELLER BUYER
SELLER BUYER
Selling Agent
•
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PE /�-
`7C 8
Col► aRC1AL-DOUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGRFMAM rr
2654 Kenzie Terrace
Page I of 5
ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT#1
Dated: May 30,2000
Property Addrebb: 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Property ID: 070292324002.0 and 070292324 21
OFFER SUBJECT TO:
1. Obtaining successful bank tinancingct cc.e PAub1'C- k o b�ti
2. Building appraises for purchase price.
3. Obtaining special use permit for buyer's use; church and storage on bottom floor, As lease Space.
4. Inspection by qualified professional on roof,foundation, mechanicals, electrical and plumbing. Seller
will bring into satisfactory working condition if any repairs are needed to comply with all local codes
and ordinances.
5. Subject to Buyer's and Seller's attorney's approval of purchase agreement within 10 days after
Buyer's and Seller's signatures of Purchase Agreement.
6. Buyer's review and acceptance of a well disclosure statement.
7. Upon removal of Contingency#3.(obtaining a special use permit from the city of St. AuQiony for said
use)Buyer will deposit an additional $9,000.00 earnest money in a Kraus-Anderson trust account
within 10 business days of completion. Said frost account shall be an interest bcaring account.
8. Upon signatures of Buyers and Sellers of this Purchase Agreement dated May 30, 2000, shall void
Purchasc Agreement between same Buyer and Seller dated April 7,2000, April 1 R, 2(} O, and May 4,
2000,and earnest money of Purchase Agreement dated April 7, 2000 shall be applied to purchase
agreement dated May 30, 2000.
9. Property shall remain on the market for sale until all contingencies have been removed. However, any
or all subsequent offers or purchase agreements shall be subject to cancellation of this agreement
agreed up on by the buyer.
10. Seller shall grant buyer the first right of first refusal on the We of the second mortgage on the same
terms as acceptable to other purchaser.
11. Buyer will indemnify Seller for any costs/assessments to Seller related to the application to the City for
a special use permit. qp-v-
12. First Right of Refusal: ForW days after the date of this agreement,Seller will not enter into another
purchase agreement that activates Buyer's first right of refusal before September 1, 2000. Thereafter,
upon written notification to buyer that seller has received another acceptable offer;buyer shall remove
all contingencies(within 5 business days) and proceed to closing within 60 days or this purchase
agreement shall become null and void and all earnest money shall be returned to buyer with any
accumulated interest. The above closing date of 60 days after notification is contingent upon buyer
being released from its present lease at the Hamline Shopping Center, otherwise closing date shall
occur September 1, 2001. Seller shall pay all special assessments levied and including or payable prior
to September 1, 2000. Buyer shall pay all special assessments levicd or pending after September 1,
• 2000 as ordered by the City Council or other governmental assessing authorities. Buyer and Seller
shall prorate as of date of closing,real estate taxes due and pnynhle in the year of closing.
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI R
49
COMMMCL4L-WDUSTRIAL PkJRUt1ASE AGREEMENT
• 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Page 5 of 5
ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT#2
Dated: May 30,2000 .
Property Adth'ess: 2654 Ken2ie Terrace
Property ID: 07029?'4240020 and 0702923240021
FINANCIAL ADDENDUM:
Purchase Price: $625,000.00
Cash at Closing: 57,000.00
Bank Financing: 41 9,M O.00
Seller Financing: 150,000.00 by second mortgage, 5 year term. Payments to begin 90
(Note at a rate of 8-1/2% for days after closing, however., interest will accrue as of dntz of
15 year,amortization with a closing:
balloon at end of 5"year.)
*Earnest money to be held in trust account by Kraus-Anderson (upon removal of contingencies, earnest
money to be transferred to interest bearing trust account.).
J TITLE SURVEY /
` � � *. I ..�...'�`,��...' r"+.'�"`�rr ter•�`.`�
,'; � �o�a �� �♦♦ ♦♦1 Vie/ ; Z I �� _.r_r_r_....rr.r_
J b ��. � I' I � � I I ♦ a"o.•r.+�i..�.��i..�o�w h.wr Y
y�' r✓ Q.�\�y � � d_efms I ��Ql. �/ I b I t .�r....w.atrn�t�.w__
� �� .�`�' E�fQ �� I .I taut I I �3.87.f �• a ,,,r.._r ��.^.
j
I
S ♦ / I I _ s r..e.�.a fr_.rl�r��.._.r.
,lp \
"cb
• .7 S-♦ //•[\ A, I �' I a wr...nr.r r..n..r rs�..�`t�r
_ / p trar�r.
//•J9.! S
V ♦ // T � I
fr?•• S •\ �w i I I ♦f)}fP = °•-'y=fly .- `r�l.r.�w�.•r��.�rie.l.try rr
'�•1 Y I \ .{p�2 B o fin+:'' ..rw w.e..a..r.r 1...a s r.•r r
•�•:r' .. \ ?b�4l '/ `/! \' \i � O� S �• �,��tryf' ��r..~"'^•`�no..f`..°r'�':.....`.r
"' t ti..r r_.r w r rr•r r �.` r r
~7µ7'i _ ` :.�.....•.,.
- NCIdTT YAO_ \ \ re •\]•�4 �� w r�w..a e��r� t
�'•• y �fi mo • - -.c•. ......�iw:one:`��+.`�� ` 1
♦t \ /�• INV., rl i _I '�•.• f sr TSrr.tr ���.r.r Cbr�.�� 1
�•s / ` \ •// .P fT9 � A � -\�i.Y t >....r.�,w.a�r r...�w.r.r
.; � � � � -'•+�."7ii�", ..mow:.. ..r r..^..�+rr
fITIfl \♦ ��Vd ��..�,.:- 1.i.1.rn �.r.... r.r.rti
sri[ —eo....Q ...r r .m„...w •.c;tYt�' ......m( .�. .
RMS+OM ®4 7]E701 D�0
Hakanson ETA / AGSM SURVEY
r_=a �= Anderson t
Assoc.,lnc. CUSTOM UOUIDATORS INC, fv
tO` - m - ..r.......•�--+ 5T. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 1
fA e»w
�- •� V ._fut r �lr-ar. s� 9/fllM
ANSI-
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY u;= ,
DEVELOPnENT 9TE ARFA 635739 SF.(14.58 ACRES) 7.u71 y: �:...� 1•.J ` 14
( T,
NLl!.E fJiEFN MF? id,181 9F. 1.58 KRES) -,- y T�+r-7 r T. O
NLRTN RETAIL STORE 77,576 SFS. 1.78
SITE AREA 88 PACES ACRES)
- n
PARKOiG SPACES
HCKTN RETAIL eUlD01G 50,40D S.F. !i -J�9�irof� .y�• P7
EXISTN6 91ALOA+G AREA 45,80 S.F.
E%PAN9011 eI1RPNT.AREA 4,6x0 S.F. 'm
ROVE-7NRU PWRttAL7 ADDED r� Ski
SOJiN RETAL 80LDING 50,4E0 S.F.
E1a9T1NG HWLDOS AREA ",93 S.F. {`25.->•;.- .}i __
EXPANSONI BI11LalY ARFA n Oil S.F. -g"t-o7��.A'+��' d __ - r�4 ''•:
RESTAURANT(300 SEAT5) Id,C00 S.F. :y' k r
IXISTNG pAm PIEEN
EXPANSION e111LDING AREA 4M S.F.
MO
N0RTwsam RETAIL PARKING SPACES .-
(4.3 SPACESAON 9f.LF RETAIL AREA)
NEST RETAIL%DING 1i,700 S.F.
DAYCARE SPACE IO,o00 5.F.
$T.ANTNd1T FIRE STATION L 700 5 F fey �,,^•. E -
PARK0IG 9PACES 5(SPACES
14A SPACES/1000 S.F.OF RETAIL AREA)l,f.+�^'
WTC% POST TACLON+G SPACER
PARKNG 9PACE5 g -1•- Lr `,?y �y j'
(7.7 5PACE5/1000 SF.OF RETAb#¢REA� t 4 ! .-
C
0411146
_
k� •�1 rA.r
nse
a SAINT
ANTHONY
SHOPPING
CENTER
SAINT ANTHONY,MINNESOTA
1V�j: PREPARED TOR
REPUBLIC INVESTMENT COMPANY
hr
J�
T ustlie
't e Montgomery
Aesocio[ea
Inc.
PROPOSED MASTER AN — OP TI
33M EdA W WAh 10-Y. •803
- A in.maN.Mm t. SS43S
52
•
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 00-059
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST TO
TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission to consider a request
from Frontline Church, for the commercial property located at 2654 Kenzie
Terrace, to amend the City Zoning Ordinance to add "Church" as a permitted
conditional use in a "C", commercial zoning district; and
WHEREAS, following due consideration, the Planning Commission recommended Council
denial of said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in agreement with the-findings of the Planning
Commission at their July 18, 2000 meeting, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
denies the request for the zoning ordinance amendment submitted by Frontline Church.
® Adopted this day of , 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
•
53
• INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL J.MORNSON ;
FROM:
JOEL A`HEWITT
SUBJECT: EMERGENCY PRE-EMPTION TRAFFIC SYSTEM
DATE: 9/1/00
DEFINITIONS:
EVP = Emergency Pre-Emption Traffic System This system interrupts normal signaling cycle,
to provide a green light to approaching emergency vehicles and stop all opposing traffic to reduce the
potential for intersection collisions.
OPTICOM =System produced by 3M corporation. 3M is the first to produce such a system.
EMMITTERS = Emergency Vehicle transmitter to the intersection signal.
RECEIVER= Component installed on the traffic signal arm to receive emitters signal
SYSTEM OPERATION = As an emergency vehicle approaches an intersection, the emitter
on the vehicle sends a coded infrared light signal to the receiver on the signal arm of the intersection
light. The receiver lights a solid white light on the arm to indicate to the emergency vehicle operator
the system has been activated. The other three directions of travel receiver lights flash white. This
provides other emergency vehicle operators approaching the intersection from other directions,
indicating another emergency vehicle has captured the intersection system and is proceeding through
the intersection.This system prevents collisions between emergency vehicles.
Once the system is activated the normal timed light cycle is immediately terminated. The signal
light then proceeds through the yellow,red cycle for approaching three travel directions before giving
a, or maintaining light for the approaching emergency vehicle. The system will not interrupt
the cycle for crosswalk traffic or if the signal light is tied to a railroad crossing.
BACKGROUND: In March of 2000, the St Anthony City Council approved to appropriate
$65,000 for the installation of an emergency vehicle pre-emption system, at the eight signalized
intersections within the city.
The project has been assigned to the Fire Chief to oversee through to completion. Prior to my
appointment Fire Captain Jay Olson had spearheaded the project and will be co-managing the project
with me. Pubic Works Director Jay Hartman is also involved in the project due to the involvement of
traffic control devices and work which is to be done in the county sector of the Public Works
• Departments of Hennepin and Ramsey counties
54
•
In April 2000, Council approved to hire the engineering firm of Short,Elliot and Hendrickson,
to design,prepare specifications, solicit bids and supervise installation of an E.V.P. system Contract
fees for their work are not to exceed $8,000. The installation of our system is complicated by .
signalized intersections located in two counties and'having outdated equipment that will not accept,
this 'system. Their experience in this area of.traffic control design and construction will ease the
installation of our system
To begin the process SEH conducted an audit of our eight intersections to estimate installation
costs to make each intersection operational with an EVP system The audit revealed information to
prepare an estimate of $118,748 to install our system The estimate includes construction costs,
equipment costs, Hennepin and Ramsey county signal reconfiguration costs, design costs and
purchase costs of ten emitters.
The fire departments review of the costs audit, revealed the intersection of Kenzie
Terrace/Lowry & Stinson Blvd. Is the most expensive intersection to.make it EVP operational, at
$36,862. Due to the location of this intersection on the southwest comer of the city,is rarely used by
our emergency vehicles. In our opinion the benefit of the intersection having an E.V.P. is
outweighed by the cost. It is our recommendation to omit this intersection from the project,
reducing the estimated costs to$81,886.
The City of Roseville has indicated they may fund 25% of the costs associated with the
intersection of Highway 88 and 29th Ave. N.E.As they would be using this intersection in responding
to our,city with mutual aid or our department responding to their city. This figure is an estimated
• $2,600.Reducing costs to$79,286 complete.
RECOMMENDATION: The installation of an E.V.P. system will enhance the safety of our
citizens,persons who travel through our city and our police and firefighters. By minimizing the risk
we have today, for collisions of emergency vehicles with the motoring public and with other
responding emergency vehicles. The costs associated with the implementation of this system will be
returned in the savings of costs that would be expended in the unfortunate occurrence of an accident
involving an emergency vehicle.(Not to mention the embarrassment and demoralizing of our fire
and police department's as well as to the city.)
It is the recommendation of the Police Chief and myself to appropriate additional estimated
funds of $14,286, for a total of $79,286 to complete the installation of an E.V.P. system and
additionally to authorize Short Elliot and Hendrickson to proceed with the design,solicitation of bids
and to supervise the installation of our system In the seven of our eight signalized intersections.
Attachment:
2
Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate
Emergency Vehicle Preemption(EVP)
St.Anthony,Minnesota
Prepared by JMG(SEH)on 7/19/00'
Estimated. Estimated City Estimated Hennepin/ Estimated Total
Contractor Furnished Ramsey County Costs Minneapolis Costs Estimated
Intersection Location: Costs Material Costs To Make Operational To Make Operational EVP Costs
1) Silver Lake Road at 39t6 Avenue NE $2,100 $1,048 $0 $0 $3,148 ,
2) Silver Lake Road at 37th Avenue NE $2,300 $2,359 $0 $0 $4,659
3) Silver Lake Road at 33rd Avenue NE $8,000 $2,610 $100 $0 $10,710
4) New Brighton Boulevard(88)at $6,000 $2,862 $350 $0 $9,212
29th Avenue NE
5) Silver Lake Road/Kenzie Terrace at $9,600 $3,176 $3,350 $0 $16,126
St.Anthony Boulevard
6). New Brighton Boulevard(88)at $14,500 $3,813 $350 $0 $18,663
St.Anthony Boulevard
7) Kenzie Terrace at Apartment Drives $3,700 $2,368 $300 $0 $6,368
8) Kenzie Terrace/Lowry Avenue at $9,000 $2,862 $0 $25,000 $36,862
Stinson Parkway
Total Estimated Costs $55,200 $21,098 $4,450 $25,000 $105,748
Add Proposed Design Costs for Each EVP System $8,000
Add Estimated Costs for City to purchase 10 EVP-Emitters $5,000
Total Estimated Project Costs $118,748
56
Aow EN 3535 Vadnais Center Drive,200 SEH Center,St. Paul,MN 55110-5108 651.490.2000 _V
architecture engineering environmental transportation
July 19, 2000 RE: .St. Anthony,Minnesota
Emergency Vehicle Preemption
SEH No. A-SANTH0005.00
Mr. Jay Hartman
Director of Public Works
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony,MN 55418
Dear Mr. Hartman:
At the request of the City of St.Anthony,Short Elliott Hendrickson,Inc. (SEH)was retained to review the
eight(8)signalized intersections within the City that currently do not have Emergency Vehicle Preemption
(EVP),or the ability of emergency vehicles (police cars,fire trucks and ambulances)to obtain a green light
sooner(to lessen travel times to incident sites).
Our review focuses on equipment needed to make each EVP system operational,cost estimates for the City
to obtain the necessary EVP equipment for each system, cost estimates (from Hennepin and Ramsey
Counties, and the City of Minneapolis) for upgrading each signal system to accept EVP, and estimated
construction costs outside of the materials costs. Our review also included a meeting with Jay Olson of
the City Fire Department to discuss how to make each system operate to meet Police and Fire Department's
needs.
The following process was.used to analyze each intersection:
We reviewed each intersection in detail to determine proper placement of detection devices. This
included several drives through each intersection to account for curves, hills and other impediments
to site distance to.an.intersection. .
0 We obtained the existing signal plans from the appropriate agencies (Hennepin and Ramsey Counties,
and the City of Minneapolis) to determine other specific needs for each EVP system. This would
include the need for additional cables and conduit to be installed,and use of inplace signal equipment
to aid in the installation of the EVP system.
• We contacted the supplier of EVP materials (detectors, cables and EVP equipment for the signal
controller cabinets) that each County and the City of Minneapolis would require be used for each
• intersection. Traffic Control Corporation is the local supplier of 3M Opticom EVP equipment, the
brand of equipment that each agency only allows to be installed at each intersection. We discussed
anticipated equipment needs with Traffic Control Corporation for each system, and obtained a cost
estimate from them for the City to purchase these materials. By having the City purchase these
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Offices located throughout the Upper Midwest Equal Opportunity Employer
We help you plan,design,and achieve.
57
Mr. Jay Hartman
July 19,2000
Page 2
•
materials (for installation by a contractor) instead of having a contractor furnish and install these
materials,the City can realize a significant cost savings. This is because Traffic Control Corporation
offers a 40 percent promotional discount on these materials to agencies-that order directly from Traffic
Control Corporation, for multiple installations.
• We contacted Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, and the City of Minneapolis to discuss upgrades that
would be required on the controller and cabinet at each intersection, to allow for EVP to be made
operational. At some locations,the controller or controller cabinet are not capable of allowing for EVP
to be made operational at this time due to age and/or limitations of this equipment. Work ranging from
minor wiring modifications to the installation of a new controller and cabinet can be required to be
completed to allow for EVP to be made operational. Each agency's policy is to complete this controller
and cabinet work themselves (contractors are not allowed to do this work, per agency policy) and to
bill the City for this work.
• Finally,we gathered all of this information and completed an estimated cost summary for the City to
make each EVP system operational.
Each intersection is described in detail as to what equipment will be needed to make each system
operational, and what agency involvement will be required to allow for an EVP system to be placed into
• operation.
The following is a summary of each intersection's specific requirements:
1. Silver Lake Road at 39th Avenue Northeast
Sight distance is not a problem for any of the intersection approaches,thus no detectors other than signal
mast arm mounted detectors would be needed.
Materials that would need to be purchased from Traffic Control Corporation would include four (4)
detectors (one for each approach), and cable to operate one of the detectors (cable for the other three
detectors is already inplace at the intersection). The cabinet control equipment for this system is already
inplace.
Ramsey County would have minor work to complete at this intersection to make the EVP system
operational,but mentioned that they would not bill the City for this work(since it is so minor).
Ramsey County mentioned that they would require an agreement be completed between the County and
the City to account for ongoing maintenance of this EVP system(and the system at 37th Avenue also). The
City would be billed by the County for any maintenance work to the EVP system that the County,would
be required to do.
•
Mr. Jay Hartman 5
July 19,2000
Page 3
•
2. Silver Lake Road at 37th Avenue Northeast
Sight distance is not a problem for any of the intersection approaches, thus.no detectors other than signal
mast arm mounted detectors would be needed.
Materials that would need to be purchased from"Traffic Control Corporation would include four (4)
detectors(one for each approach),and the cabinet control equipment needed to operate the system. Cable
for each detector is already inplace at the intersection.
Ramsey County would have minor work to complete at this intersection to make the EVP system
operational,but mentioned that they would not bill the City for this work(since it is so minor).
3. Silver Lake Road at 33rd Avenue Northeast
Sight distance to each intersection approach is good, thus signal mast arm mounted detectors can be used
to properly detect each approach.
Due to the close proximity of the Police Department, it was recommended (per conversations with Jay
Olson and with the Police Department)that an advance detector be.installed to allow for quicker response
• of the signal system to emergency police traffic..This additional detector would be installed at the east
Police Department driveway, north of 33rd Avenue and approximately 300 feet east of Silver Lake Road.
Police traffic would need to be educated to use this driveway instead of the driveway onto Silver Lake
Road (north of the intersection) to access the signalized intersection during emergency calls.
Materials that would need to be purchased from Traffic Control Corporation would include five (5)
detectors (one for each approach, and one for the advance detector), the cabinet control equipment to
operate the system, and cable for all five detectors (no cable for EVP equipment is inplace at this time).
Hennepin County would have minor work to complete at this intersection to make the EVP system
operational (approximately 2 hours of labor and minimal materials). The County estimated that this work
can be completed.for approximately $100.
As with Ramsey County,an agreement between the City-and Hennepin County would need to be completed
for this EVP system(and for the'other four systems on Hennepin County roads)to account for maintenance
of the EVP system. The City would be billed by Hennepin County for any maintenance work to the EVP
system that the County would be required to do.
4 New Brighton Boulevard WSAH 881 at 29th Avenue Northeast
Sight distance for northbound and southbound New Brighton Boulevard and for westbound 29th Avenue
is good,and detection for these approaches can be accomplished with signal mast arm mounted detectors
only(no advance detectors). For eastbound 29th Avenue,due to a curve in the roadway and a hill west of
the intersection, two detectors are recommended for this approach (mount on the signal mast arms for
eastbound and westbound traffic).
Mr. Jay Hartman' 59
July 19, 2000
Page 4
Materials that would need to be purchased from Traffic Control Corporation would include five (5)
detectors (as described above),cable to operate,each detector,the cabinet control equipment to operate the
EVP system,and a card rack within.the controller cabinet to.house the EVP cabinet control equipment(the
controller cabinet at this intersection does not contain a card rack to mount.this equipment, whereas the
previous three intersections do contain this card rack).
Hennepin County would have relatively minor work to complete at this intersection to make the EVP
system operational (approximately 5 hours of labor and some materials). The County estimates that this
work can be completed for approximately $350.
With this intersection somewhat sharing jurisdiction with the City of Roseville (with Roseville emergency
vehicles often going from westbound to northbound through this intersection), the City of Roseville was
approached on behalf of the City of St. Anthony to see if Roseville would be open to providing funding
for this EVP system. According to Doug Strong of the City of Roseville, since the use of this intersection
by Roseville emergency vehicles is somewhat minor, and since emergency vehicles can make the
westbound to northbound movement via use of a free right condition(island provides for this movement),
Roseville emergency vehicles do not need to access the signalized portion of the intersection. Coupling
this with a lack of available funding,the City of Roseville indicated that they are not able to provide any
funding for this EVP system.
5. Silver Lake Road/Kenzie Terrace at StAnthony Boulevard
Many conflicts exist with sight distance for all intersection approaches, due to curves in the roadway
(northbound, southbound and eastbound) and due to the close proximity of the nearest signalized
intersection to the east (at New Brighton Boulevard). In addition, with this intersection being a main
intersection for both the police and fire departments,proper and effective detection is imperative to each
agency for quick timing of the EVP system.
To accommodate emergency fire department traffic from the nearby fire station to this intersection (and
for emergency vehicles turning right at this intersection and continuing east to the New Brighton Boulevard
signal system),it is recommended that push buttons be installed in the garage area of the fire station to call
both this signal system and the signal system at New Brighton Boulevard. A separate button would be
installed to activate the EVP system at each intersection,thus fire station traffic'continuing north on Silver
Lake Road would not need to activate the EVP system for New Brighton Boulevard and tie traffic up at
that intersection.
With southbound Silver Lake Road to eastbound St. Anthony Boulevard being a principal route for
emergency police traffic,detection needs to be designed to not only advance call this signal system but also
the signal system at New Brighton Boulevard (and thus clear traffic from both intersection approaches).
The recommended way to provide detection to each EVP system is to install a detector on the inplace street
• light near the signal controller cabinets(southeast corner of the intersection). This detector would not only
provide adequate sight distance for southbound traffic to this signal system but would also provide early
call time to the EVP system at New Brighton Boulevard (thus starting to clear traffic out from the area
Mr. Jay Hartman 60
July 19, 2000
Page 5
between Silver Lake Road and New Brighton Boulevard on St. Anthony Boulevard and making accessing
the New Brighton Boulevard intersection faster):
Thus,a total of five(5)detectors and one(1)push button would be recommended to be-installed to provide'
detection at this intersection.
Materials that would need to be purchased from Traffic Control Corporation would include the five (5)
detectors,cable for each detector(and for the push button), the cabinet control equipment to operate the
system, and a card rack within the controller cabinet to house the EVP cabinet control equipment (the
controller cabinet at this intersection does not have a card rack suitable for mounting this equipment).
The controller unit at this intersection is a Honeywell controller and is incapable of allowing for EVP to
be made operational. Thus, Hennepin County would need to furnish and install a new controller unit to
allow for EVP to be used at this intersection. In addition to a new controller unit,Hennepin County would
have approximately 5 hours of labor and would have to install some materials to make this EVP system
work. Hennepin County estimates that these materials and labor would cost the City approximately$3,350.
6. New Brighton Boulevard (CSAH 88) at St. Anthony Boulevard
As-,discussed in the preceding intersection analysis, a push button is recommended to be installed in the
nearby fire station to aid in emergency vehicle travel time from the fire station to this intersection. Also,
wiring to a detector on the street light pole mentioned above is recommended to be installed to be able to
advance call this signal system also for southbound police traffic.
Sight distance for northbound New Brighton Boulevard is good, and no additional detection other than a
signal mast arm mounted detector is needed. Southbound New Brighton Boulevard has sight distance
limited by a curve in the roadway, and an additional detector mounted on the northwest signal pole is
recommended to be installed (in addition to the signal mast arm mounted detector) to provide adequate
sight distance for southbound traffic to the EVP system.
Due to a hill and bridge east of the intersection, it is recommended that a separate advance detector
(mounted on a pedestal pole)be 'installed near the existing bridge,.for westbound traffic to adequately be
able to call the signal system.
Thus,a total of five(5)detectors and one(1)push button would be recommended to be installed to provide
detection at this intersection. A sixth means of detection (detector mounted on street light pole, as
mentioned above for the adjacent intersection), would also be recommended for this signal system.
However, this sixth detector(other than a cable to this detector) would be included in the costs to install
the adjacent EVP system.
• Materials that would need to be purchased from Traffic Control Corporation would include the five (5)
detectors, cable for each detector (and for the push button and street light pole mounted detector), the
cabinet control equipment to operate the system, and a card rack within the controller cabinet to house the
fl
Mr. Jay Hartman.
July 19, 2000
Page 6
EVP cabinet control equipment (the controller cabinet at this intersection does not have a card rack
available for mounting this equipment).
Hennepin County would have relatively minor work to complete at this intersection to make the EVP
system operational (approximately 5 hours of labor and some materials). The County estimates that this
work can be completed for approximately $350.
7 Kenzie Terrace at Kenzingion Apartments/Autumn Woods Apartments
Sight distance is not a problem for any of the intersection approaches, thus no detectors other than signs
mast arm mounted detectors would be needed.
Materials that would need to be purchased from Traffic Control Corporation would include four (4)
detectors,cable to operate each detector, and the cabinet control equipment needed to operate the system.
Hennepin County would have relatively minor work to complete at this intersection to make the EVP
system operational (approximately 4 hours of labor and some materials). The County estimates that this
work can be completed for approximately $300.
• 8 Kenzie Terrace/Lowry Avenue at Stinson Parkway
Sight distance for northbound and southbound Stinson Parkway and for eastbound Lowry Avenue is good,
and detection for these approaches can be accomplished with signal mast arm mounted detectors only (no
advance detectors). For westbound Kenzie Terrace;due to a curve in the roadway,a separate pedestal pole
mounted detector is recommended to be installed for this approach (in addition to a signal mast arm
mounted detector at the intersection). This detector would need to be located approximately 250'west of
the intersection to provide adequate sight distance for westbound emergency traffic.
Materials that would need to be purchased from Traffic Control Corporation would include the five (5)
detectors(as described above),and cable to operate each detector. The City of Minneapolis mentioned that
they may be able to provide the EVP cabient control equipment and the card rack for the controller cabinet.
as part of the new controller and cabinet needed at this intersection(see below),but for estimating purposes
we are showing these items as being purchased by the City from Traffic Control Corporation.
Per conversations with Steve Mosing of the City of Minneapolis, the controller and cabinet at this
intersection is old(1979)and is incapable of accepting EVP operation. A new controller and cabinet would
need to be furnished and installed by the City of Minneapolis in order to make EVP operational. Steve
estimated that this would cost approximately$25,000 to complete this work. The City of Minneapolis does
not have the funding available to share in the cost of this EVP system, and is not programming any work
at this intersection in the near future. Thus, if the City of St. Anthony wishes to pursue EVP operation at-
• this intersection, all costs related to this work (including the new controller and cabinet) would be the
responsibility of the City of St. Anthony. Steve did mention that Minneapolis may be able to provide the
EVP cabinet control equipment and the card rack as part of the package for providing a new.controller and
cabinet at the intersection, but that would be the only costs that Minneapolis could share in at this time.
62
Mr. Jay Hartman'
July 19,2000
Page 7
•
Summary:
As discussed above, we estimate'that for the City of St. Anthony to complete installation of Emergency
Vehicle Preemption at the eight(8)intersections described, it would cost the City approximately$106,000.
This cost does not include design costs, nor costs for the City to purchase emitters to operate the EVP
systems. A detailed cost estimate is attached to this letter showing breakdowns for each proposed EVP
system.
Please feel free to contact me at(651)490-2073 if you wish to discuss this information further. If desired,
we can meet to review each intersection on-site, to clarify what equipment we feel is needed to adequately
operate each EVP system. Also,please let me know at your convenience what design work the City wishes
us to complete on this project. We will not proceed with design of these EVP systems until authorized by
the City to do so.
Sincerely,
M M. Gray, P.E.
•. Project Engineer
c: Jay Olson, St. Anthony Village Fire Department
Bob Weber, Ramsey County
Lee Donais, Hennepin County
Steve Mosing, City of Minneapolis
Eydie Peterson,Traffic Control Corporation
Bob Moberg, SEH
S:\TRP.NS I PROJ ECTP-T%ST-AN-OGRE V E V PRP.W PD
•
63
AdEW 3535 Vadnais Center Drive,200 SEH Center,St. Paul,MN 55110-5108 651.490.2000 E
architecture engineering environmental transportation
•
August 17;2000 RE: St. Anthony,Minnesota
Citywide EVP Installation
SEH No. A-SANTH0005.00
Mr. Karl Keel
Director of Public Works
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville,MN 55113
Dear Mr. Keel:
The City of St. Anthony is considering the installation of Emergency Vehicle Preemption(EVP)on
all inplace signal systems throughout the City. At their upcoming September 12 council meeting,
it will be decided as to whether to authorize design.and construction of the EVP systems, for
• installation and operation during the spring.of 2001. One of the EVP systems being considered for
installation is at the intersection of New Brighton Boulevard(CSAH 88)and 29th Avenue Northeast,
which is in close proximity to the City of Roseville.
From conversations with both Jay Olson of the St. Anthony Village Fire Department and Doug
Strong of the City of Roseville, we have learned that the City of Roseville often uses the above-
mentioned intersection for emergency runs into various areas of the City of Roseville. Upon
installation of an EVP system at this intersection, it appears that both the City of St. Anthony and
the City of Roseville will benefit from the presence of this EVP system, helping to expedite
emergency vehicles accessing this intersection.
From our conversations with Doug Strong, both by SEH and by Jay Olson, it appears that the
Roseville Fire Department also agrees that-this system is beneficial to the City of Roseville for .
emergency operations. In light of these conversations, the City of St. Anthony is requesting that the
City of Roseville participate in the costs for installation of an EVP system at New Brighton
Boulevard (CSAH 88)/29th Avenue Northeast.
Since one leg of the intersection is predominantly serving the City of Roseville, the City of St.
Anthony requests that the City of Roseville share in 25 percent of the costs of the EVP system. .
Estimated costs of the EVP system at this intersection,per a comprehensive study of the intersection
by SEH and through conversations with material suppliers and Hennepin County(the maintainer of
the signal system at this intersection),is approximately$10,200($9,200 for construction of the EVP
system, and$1,000 for design and construction observation services). Of this estimated cost, the
City of St. Anthony would request that the City of Roseville share in approximately$2,600 of the
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Offices.located throughout the Upper Midwest Equal Opportunity Employer
We help you plan;design,and achieve.
Mr. Karl Keel- 64
August 17, 2000
Page 2
costs to complete installation of this EVP system. The total estimated cost for an EVP system at this
intersection includes: installation of one (1) detector.and indicator light,-for each intersection .
approach, installation of one.(1) additional detector for the-eastbound intersection.approach,.(to
account for a curve in the roadway to the west), and costs for Hennepin County to upgrade the
controller cabinet to allow for EVP to be made operational at the intersection.
Please consider this request for participation in the costs for installation of an EVP system at this
intersection. If acceptable to you,please inform me as to how the City of Roseville would intend
to fund their portion of the project (via local funds, State Aid funds, or other source).
Please feel free to contact me at (651)490-2073 if you have any comments or questions related to
this request for participation in an EVP system at New Brighton Boulevard (CSAH 88) and 29th
Avenue Northeast, or on the project in general.
Attached, for your information, is a copy of the study prepared by SEH, detailing the City of St.
Anthony's proposed EVP installation project(costs.and proposed work at each intersection).
�. Sincerely,
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
John M. Gray, P.E.
Project Engineer
jmg
Enclosures
c: Jay Hartman, City of St. Anthony
Jay Olson, St. Anthony Village Fire Department
Doug.Strong, City.of Roseville
Q%123R5WAW0RK\R0SENffi 90.WPD
•
_ 65
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 6, 2000
TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: EMERGENCY PRE-EMPTION TRAFFIC SYSTEM (OPTICOM)
In March of 2000, the City Council approved to appropriate $65,000 for the purchase
and installation of an emergency vehicle pre-emption system.
Per the Fire Chiefs memo, I have reviewed the estimated costs associated with
implementation of an E.V.P. system. They include:
Street Light Detection Devices/Equipment $105,748
E.V.P. Vehicle Emitters 5,000
$110,748
Engineering Costs 8,000
Proposed Costs $118,748
Less: Removal of Kennzie Terrace/Lowry Avenue ($ 36,862)
City of Roseville - Highway 88/29` Avenue '2 600
Net Estimated Costs $ 79,286
Assuming that the bids will be equal to or lower than the estimated costs tabulated by
Short, Elliott and Hendrickson, additional funding is necessary to complete the project.
Included in the 12/31/99 year end fund balance is $100,143 in capital equipment
contract reserves which were.derived from the profits of the Lauderdale/Falcon Heights
police contracts. As part of the 2000 capital equipment funding, $33,300 was
designated to purchase squad cars and related equipment, leaving a balance of$66,843
for discretionary use.
Recommendation:
Council approve an additional appropriation of$14,500 towards the purchase and
installation of the E.V.P. system. Total funding approval would total $79,500
($65,000 plus $14,500).
66
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 00-065
A RESOLUTION RELATING.TO EMERGENCY
VEHICLE PREEMPTION
WHEREAS, Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) has reviewed the 8 signalized
intersections of the City of st. Anthony that do not have Emergency Vehicle
Preemption (EVP) capabilities; and
WHEREAS, the intersections are as follows:
• Silver Lake Road at 39`h Avenue NE
• Silver Lake Road at 37' Avenue NE
• Silver Lake Road at 33`d Avenue NE.
• New Brighton Boulevard (88) at 29`h Avenue NE
• Silver Lake Road/Kenzie Terrace at St. Anthony Boulevard
• New Brighton Boulevard (88) at St. Anthony Boulevard
• Kenzie Terrace at Kenzington Apartments/Autumn Woods Apartments
• Kenzie Terrace/Lowry Avenue at Stinson Parkway (eliminated - see SEH
letter attached)
• WHEREAS cost for the installation of the above at the 7 intersections is estimated at
$81,000 with exceptions noted on the attached spread sheet submitted by SEH.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby authorizes SEH, Inc. to prepare plans and specifications for each EVP system as stated
above, and to advertise the project for bids.
Adopted this day of , 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
• Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
Air,my
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 23, 2000
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: STAFF REPORT ON 2001 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT
Since 1995, the City of St. Anthony has met or exceeded established livability and affordability
housing goals, as determined by the Metropolitan Council. As an incentive for adopting a
• housing action plan and supporting the Livable Communities Act, the City became eligible for
loans and grants from the Livable Communities Act Fund. St. Anthony also became eligible
for funds from the Department of Trade and Economic Development to clean up certain
polluted sites that might exist in the community. If the City should decide not to continue its
participation in this program, the City will no longer be eligible for any funds associated with
the Livable Communities Act.
The City is not required to expend any funds for Affordable and Life-cycle Housing
Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) because the City continues to meet and maintain its housing
goals.
Since this commitment is required to be renewed annually by each City, attached is a
resolution for the Council's consideration.
•
6
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 00-078
A RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING
IN THE.LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM
UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT
FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2001
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.25
to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is
intended to address housing and other development issues facing the
metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base
Revitalization Account,the Livable Communities Demonstration Account, the
Local Housing Incentive Account and the Inclusionary Housing Account is
intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area
municipalities; and
WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under
the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain
• polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and.
Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local
Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes Section
.473.254; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to
negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life-cycle housing
goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of
the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development
Guide; and
WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the
municipality plans to take;to.meet the established housing-goals through
preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing,
negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for each participating
municipality; and
WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing
Incentives Account program must do so by November 15 of each year; and
•
69
Page 2
•
WHEREAS, for calendar year 2001, a metropolitan area municipality that participated in the-
Local Housing Incentive Program during the calendar year 2000, can continue
to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473:254 if:.(a) the municipality'
elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives program by November 15,
2000; and (b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully
negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the municipality.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan
Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 2001.
Adopted this day of , 2000.
Mayor
• ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
•
7®
145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
•
Phone: (651) 281-1200 - (800) 925-1122.
TDD (651) 281-1290
League of Minnesota Cities LNIC Fax: (651) 281-1299 - LMCIT Fax: (651) 281-1298
Cities promoting excenence
Web Site: http://www.Imnc.6rg
August 21, 2000
Michael Morrison, Mgr- St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Rd NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
Dear Michael:
I am writing to personally ask for your help.
At the June Annual Conference, the League launched its Building Quality Communities
initiative. This program is.a two-year effort in part to change how legislators, the media, and
citizens look at local government. As you know'all to well, the dialogue often focuses
exclusively on the level of taxation without recognition that those taxes have a direct bearing on
the quality of life in our communities.
We are now in the process of preparing our legislative agenda for the coming session. As part of
that effort, our policy committees will be reviewing all of our policies in the context of the
Building Quality Communities initiative. Our hope, of course, is that by framing policies in this
way it will help to make that important connection between cities and quality of life. Another
important step, and the purpose of this letter, is to be able to demonstrate to legislators and the
media that we have widespread support among Minnesota's cities. Therefore, I am asking that
you present the accompanying resolution to your City Council.for its consideration.
Thank you for your consideration. Please send copies of your adopted resolutions to Laura
Petersen at the League offices. Also, if you have any questions or would like further information,
please contact either Laura or me.
Sincerely,
o ► -7-11 Al
James F. Miller
• Executive Director
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNrrY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 00-079
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION
IN THE BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES EFFORT
WHEREAS, the top values and priorities of citizens include safety, family,job opportunities, health,
the well-being of children, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, many of the services cities provide directly enhance those citizen priorities; and
WHEREAS, the connection between City services and how they benefit citizen priorities and
concerns is not always understood by citizens; and
WHEREAS, it is one of the responsibilities of City officials to ensure legislators, media and citizens
understand their governments through open and frequent communication using various
avenues and means; and
WHEREAS, it is important to encourage citizens to actively participate in City government, to share
their views, and to work in partnership with City officials to ensure that the needs of
the community are met; and
WHEREAS, partnerships developed between citizens and City officials can result in greater
understanding of the connection between Minnesota's high quality of life and the
• sery ices provided by Minnesota cities, as well as in greater trust by citizens in the
efforts of their City government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
declares its commitment to join in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" statewide
educational effort in cooperation with our fellow members of the League of Minnesota Cities. We
hereby designate as the City of St. Anthony's key contact for this effort,
and will inform the League of Minnesota Cities of this designation.
Adopted this day of , 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
• Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
72
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 8, 2000
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: CENTRAL PARK PROJECT/FUNDING
As directed by you, I have come up with a possible financial plan to pay for the $1.6
million dollar Central Park Project with zero increases in taxes and full utilization of
budget reserves.
The proposed funding sources for Central Park are as follows:
1) $585,000 - General Obligation Bond (Abate Evergreen Townhomes)
The debt associated with the Evergreen Soil Correction District has been defeased. The
District can now be decertified (expires is 2001) and established as a Tax Abatement
Parcel.
• Revenues from the property Y are sufficient to fund the $585,000 General Obligation
Bond based on a minimum School abatement of$29,000 as shown by the Springsted
analysis. If the School abates more, which they can, the bond issue can be increased
and the City wouldn't have to use as much reserves.
2) $250,000 - General Fund Reserves
Previously, these reserves were set aside for budget contingencies for potential losses in
revenue in State Aid (LGA/HACA) and Liquor Profits.
3) $100,000 - Parks Grant (State Amateur Grant).
4) $665,000 - Funding from the Water Filtration Fund.
As part of the Springsted Debt Study, an analysis was performed to identify available
water filtration funds without jeopardizing funding for operation and maintenance or
plant replacement costs. Funds totaling $1,000,000 were identified as useable.
It should be noted that the Water Filtration Funds have been invested in long-term
investments with the intention of preserving capital while using the interest earnings to
• pay for the operation and maintenance of the GAC Plant. To make these funds available
for the Central Park Project without losses in principal, liquidation of investments s
would occur over the next several months.
XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL.
4b
hodation of
2000 REGIONAL MEETING •
league of MinnesotaCities Four Points Hotel (formerly the Sheraton Metrodome) Metrgpolitan
Cities promoting exeenence p munidpalifid
133.0 Industrial Boulevard, Minneapolis
Thursday, September 28ffi, 3-8:30 pm
JOIN USI It's time again for the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC)to join forces with the Association of Metropolitan .
Municipalities (AMM)to bring you a Fall Regional Meeting tailored to the special interests of elected and appointed city officials in
the metropolitan area.
HI-TECH AFTERNOON In the afternoon, learn about how several of the information and communications resources traditionally
available from LMC and AMM can now.be accessed through the Web. Find out how LMC can help your city enhance its.own
dynamic presence on the Web. And our legal experts will get you up-to-date about Internet access as it pertains to data practices,
records retention, and open meeting laws.
EVENING ACTION The evening program covers two topics important to any metropolitan city. First, AMM hosts a roundtable
discussion with key members of the Metropolitan Council. Find out more about the directions the Council intends to take over the
next couple of years, and how your city might be impacted. Following the roundtable, we'll explain (with the help of a humorous
Buzz Olson video)how your city can get on board LMC's exciting public relations initiative,Building Quality Communities. Its
purpose is to enhance the image of cities-with the media, legislators and the general public.
In between the afternoon and evening programs,we'll remind you-about resources for positive youth development in your city. Enjoy
networking and dinner, and hear from LMC President Gary Doty and AMM President Terry Schneider about priorities for your two
organizations.
REGISTER with this form or on-line at at www.lmnc.org
City of
Name &Title Name & Title
Name &Title Name& Title
Mail this form with$35 per person to Rebecca Erickson, LMC, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN 55103 or fax to 651-281-1296.
74
2000 REGIONAL MEETING
Four Points Hotel halation of
0 Industrial Boulevard Minneapolis
L L7C
133 P MetropolitaThursday, September 28h, 3-8:30 pm tu Gtie.xcJenee
Municipalities �<
3:00 Opening and Welcome
p 9
3:05 Accessing LMC and AMM Services Via the Web >
Brian Still, Web Communications Coordinator, LMC ss
Erica Norris, Publications Manager, LMC
Cheryl Budewitz, Director of Communications and Research, AMM
3:45 Web Services Available for Your City through LMC
Z Mary-Margaret Zindren,Assistant to the Executive Director, LMC
4:00 Data Practices, Records Retention and Open Meeting Law
Compliance in-the High Tech Age
LMC Legal Staff
z
4:30 Tools for Positive Youth Development in Your.Community
Kayla Boettcher, America's Promise Fellow,LMC
5:00 Networking and Dinner
6:30 Welcome from Host City Official
s, 6:40 Remarks from the Presidents
Gary Doty, LMC
Terry Schneider,AMM
7:00 Metropolitan Council Discussion
7:45 Building Quality Communities `
Laura Petersen, Public Relations Coordinator, LMC
8:30 Adjourn
z
S�
..r.r.nnr\.\....:•//...N\n.N/'/.•\•/v .•. WV\^/.^.N./r\rvv.i....:.. ... _ J`.!'..f,^r.-.../`.'/`.^..^.^.^.^..^ ' - ' ' '.-:.^'\'v�'/:.':/v':, : v\%.r./ . r-/v.:..v"..:�1'�N
•
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS
•
JULY - 2000 City of St.Anthony
Profit&Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE 07/31/00. 07/31/99 (Decrease)
Sales $171,050.00 $166,449.00 $60,200.00 $2,620,621.00 $2,550,474.00 $70,147.00
Less:Cost of Goods Sold $135,726.00 $133,241.00 $19,072.00 $1,877,534.00 $1,851,747.00 $25,787.00
Gross Profit $35,324.00 $33,208.00 $41,128.00 $743,087.00 $698,727.00 $44,360.00
Ratio to Net Sales 20.65% 19.95% 68.32% 28.36% 27.40%
Operating Expense:
Salaries,Wages, Benefits $12,104.00 $8,074.00 $23,950.00 $322,239.00 $320,391.00 $1,848.00
All Other Expenses $15,081.00 $17,433.00 $21,396.00 $316,282.00 $300,679.00 $15,603.00
Total Operating Expense $27,185.00 $25,507.00 $45,346.00 $638,521.00 $621,070.00 $17,451.00
Ratio to Net Sales 15.89% 15.32% 75.33% 24.37% 24.35%
Profit from Operations $8,139.00 $7,701.00 ($4,218.00) $104,566.00 $77,657.00 $26,909.00
Other Income $1,555.00 $134.00 $3,959.00 $30,366.00 $23,938.00 $6,428.00
Net Income $9,694.00 $7,835.00 ($259.00) $134,932.00 $101,595.00 $33,337.00
Ratio to Net Sales 5.67% 4.71% -0.43% 5.15% 3.98%
July-Net Income $17,270.00
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV 11 STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 07/31/00 $67,360.00 $53,001.00 $14,571.00 $134,932.00
YEAR TO DATE 07/31/99 $39,000.00 $29,181.00 $33,414.00 $101,595.00 (Audited)
INCREASE/DECREASE $28,360.00 $23,820.00 ($18,843.00) $33,337.00
July - 2000 City of St.Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAVI SAVII
Beginning Inventory: $233,828.98 Beginning Inventory: $234,379.23
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers $3,881.85 Transfers ($3,881.85)
Adjustments ($4,028.65) Adjustments ($1,307.39)
Returns to Vendors ($7,322.39) Returns to Vendors ($1,526.47)
Add: Receiving $154,171.78 Add: Receiving $153,509.98
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($135,725.82) Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($133,240.42)
TOTAL $244,805.75 TOTAL $247,933.08
Total per Valuation Report $244,689.94 *** Total per Valuation Report $246,562.17 ***
Difference ($115.81) Difference ($1,370:91)
Beginning August 2000 Inventory $244,689.94 Beginning August 2000 Inventory $246,562.17
***Comes from Valuation Report ***Comes from Valuation Report
1999 Actual Profits (Audited) 2000 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAY 1 SAY 11 Stonehouse SAY-1 SAY 11 Stonehouse Profits Comparison
January $5,123.00 ($1,509.00) $4,418.00 $8,032.00 January $4,569.00 $1,343.00 $4,496.00 $10,408.00 $2,376.00
February $4,252.00 $4,800.00 $5,529.00 $22,613.00 February $2,511.00 $3,419.00 ($4,306.00) $12,032.00 ($10,581.00)
March $6,694.00 $4,882.00 $7,278.00 $41,467.00 March $9,915.00 $9,020.00 $9,039.00 $40,006.00 ($1,461.00)
April $7,020.00 ($6,956.00) $9,152.00 $50,683.00 April $15,157.00 $9,893.00 $6,060.00 $71,116.00 $20,433.00
May ($1,683.00) $8,570.00 $1,526.00 $59,096.00 May $11,957.00 $10,567.00 ($600.00) $93,040.00 $33,944.00
June $10,356.00 $11,297.00 $8,075.00 $88,824.00 June $13,557.00 $10,924.00 $141.00 $117,662.00 $28,838.00
July $7,238.00 $8,097.00 ($2,564.00) $101,595.00 July $9,694.00 $7,835.00 ($259.00) $134,932.00 $33,337.00
August ($276.00) $259.00 $6,880.00 $108,458.00 August $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $134,932.00
September $7,480.00 $5,350.00 $1,970.00 $123,258.00 September $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $134,932.00
October $5,738.00 $4,850.00 $7,413.00 $141,259.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $134,932.00
November $9,956.00 $14,749.00 $6,635.00 $172,599.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $134,932.00
December $6.936.00 $21.116.00 $4,574.00 $205,225.00 December $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $134,932.00
Total $68,834.00 $75,505.00 $60,886.00 $205,225.00 Total $67,360.00 $53,001.00 $14,571.00 $134,932.00
Increasel(Decrease) $28,360.00 $23,820.00 ($18,843.00) $33,337.00
Y-T-D By Store
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 07/31/2000
Interest Date
FIRSTAR ST ANTHONY BANK gate Purchased maturity Book Value
INVESTMENT DEMAND-MONEY MARKET SAVINGS 5.32% 1 DAY LIQUIDITY(SWEEP) $3,358,556.40
• 41M GENERAL
$386,000 FORRESTAL FUND COMM PAPER 5.95% 04/17/00 08/18/00 $378,152.94
$385,000 COOPERATIVE ASSN OF TRACTO 6.39% 06/22/00 10/20100 $376,799.50
$500,000 FNMA MED TERM NOTE 6.046% 08/10/99 08/18/14 $153,150.00
$500,000 FHLB-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.000% _ 11/18/99 07/28/17 $124,800.00
$1,032,902.44
41M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.010% 11/05/98 11/05/08 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.175% 12/07/98 12/22/08 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. 6.00% 12/21/98 06/23/04 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 02/03/99 02/24/14 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03/03/99 03/03/14 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.25% 03/09/99 03/24/14 $100,000.00
$ 45,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.20% 03/18/99 61/21/08 $45,000.00.
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.50% 03/30/99 01/24/08 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.15% 04/13/99 04/14/14 $100,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.46% 05/12/99 01/08/08 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 7.00% 06/04/99 05/06/14 $199,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK COUPON-STEP UP 7.25% 07/27/00 07/26/10 $100,000.00
$137,000 F.H.L.B. STRIPS 6.38% 08/23/95 08/25/00 $100,060.69
$800,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 01/12/99 01/28/19 $202,057.98
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.20% 01/12/99 01/28/19 $126,286.24
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 8.12% 09/09/99 07/14/17 $48,312.00
$2,120,716.91
DAIN RAUSCHER-GENERAL
$52,000 FICO STRIPPED COUPON 9.37% 6/22190 12/06/01 $19,891.31
$30,000 RFCO STRIPPED COUPON 9.22% .8/24/90 10/15/00 $12,686.95
• GNMA POOL 4734 8.50% 02101(75 01/15/05 $299.73
GNMA POOL 6472 7.50% 07101/75 07115/05 $1,421.40
GNMA POOL 14376 7.50% 03/01/77 03/15/07 $2,778.11
GNMA POOL 23364 9.00% 09/01/78 09/15/08 $1,378.65
GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01178 11/15/08 $2,471.40
$631,000 GEN MOTORS COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.20% 04/05/00 08/03/00 $618,186.87
$647,000 GEN MOTORS COMMERCIAL PAPER 6.68% 07/18100 10/16100 $636,517.71
$1,295,632.13
DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL
$125,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.041% 11/16/99 07/14/17 $31,076.25
$312,000 FNMA-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 11/17/99 08/09/19 $66,407.96
$100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12/15/99 03/08/29 $10,105.00
$200,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.15% 12/17/99 08/04/17 $48,945.00
$130,000 FNMA-ZERO COUPON BOND 8,30% 06/01/00 08/02/18 $29,555.30
$47,833 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05%' 02/06/92 02/06/03 $8,939.02
$45,000 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8.05% 03/09/92 02/06103 $8,377.25
$75,000 GNMA UNIT TRUST SERIES 59 8:05% 03/25/92 02106/03 $13,850.08
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03/03/99 03/03/14 $200,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.150% 04/14/99 04/14/14 $200,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 07/15/99 02/24/14 $193,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 8.00% 08/25/99 08/25/14 $200,000.00
$1,010,255.86
JOHN G.KINNARD
$68,000.00 US TREASURY BOND STRIP 99NV15 6.57% 07/19/94 11/15/99 $48,202.79
$43,000.00 FICO FED STRIP SERIES 1 7.479% 11/09/94 05/11/02 $24,781.96
• $500,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/29/98 08/20/18 $128,730:00
$1,200,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/21198 09/10/18 $307,538.40
$250,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COU 6.109% 02/18/99 07/07/17 $60,625.00
$550,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE 7.950% 11/24/99 06/22/18 $129,228.00
Time8/28/00 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT JULY 2000.xIsMVESTI
JOHN G.KINNARD (Continued)
$90,000.00 GREENWOOD TRUST-C/D 7.00% 10/06/94 10/12101 $90,000.00
• $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.28% 06/11/98 10/02/02 $100,578.13
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.065% 07/08/98 07108/02 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.025% 08/05/98 08/05/02 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.284% 01/14/99 01/14/09 $99,750.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK-CALLABLE 6.390% 05/17/99 05/17/06 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.50% 06/02/99 06/02/14 $99,000.00
.$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 6.50% 06/02/99 06/02/14 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN MORT-CALLABLE 7.40% 06/11/99 06/09/14 $100,000.00
$85,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE 8.00% 02/22100 02/22110 $85,000.00
$1,673,434.28
DEAN WITTER
$100,000.00 HURLEY STATE BANK-C/D 7.15% 09/21/94 09/21/01 $100,000.00
JURAN&MOODY
$150,000 GSIF FRMAC SERIES 10 7.50% 03/09/93 03/09/07 $31,726.34
$200,000 FNMA-9334 P/0 7.24% 04/20/93 03/25/23 $32,368.10
$200,000 GSIF FRMAC SER 11 66.6% 7.00% 04/20193 04/20/08 $73,701.09
$11,000 FICO STRIPS SERIES 11 9.40% 10/15/93 08/08/06 $7,991.70
$100,000 FRMAC SER 11 MPRG 33.3 7.00% 01/25/94 01/25/09 $41,064.51
$50,000 FHLMC MCB SER 1629MB 7.00% 02/07/94 01/15/23 $42,193.90
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 7.01% 08/06/97 02/01/07 $200,000.00
$300,000 FED HOME LOAN MORT CORP-AAA RATED 6.60% 11/03/97 10/13104 $302,513.03
$148,000- FHLMC STEP-UP NOTE 7.00% 06108/98 04/30/13 $148,000.00
$400,000-FNMA SEMI 30/360 6.14% 09/09/98 09/10/08 $401,317.10
$200,000-FNMA SEMI 301360 6.30% 09/10/98 09/10/08 $200,498.83
$200,000-FNMA CALLABLE 6.5% 6.50% 09/24/98 01/24/08 $298,803.49
$300,000-FNMA SEMI 301360 5.65% 5.65% 11/12/98 11/12/08 $202,617.34
$150,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 6.50% 6.50% 02117/99 02/17/06 $151,301.42
$200,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 6.50% 6.50% 03/10/99 07/28/08 $199,318.23
$200,000-FHLM SEMI 30/360 7.02% 7.02% 08/17/99 02/17/05 $200,000.00
• '$2,533,415.08
TOTAL BOOK VALUE $13,124,913.10
-----------------
-----------------
TimeB/28100 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT JULY 2000.xIsINVESTl
XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL.
1. Regional meeting, Sheraton, 9/28
2. Garbage hauler survey
3. Utility survey
4. WEB page updates
5. Vacant lots at TCF
6. Salvation Army property meeting with Hennepin County Parks
7. Kudos to staff
*Liquor profits - at the off sale continuing to increase, despite construction
*Police, Public Works, Fire - flooding
8. Construction update
*33rd - 2 weeks
*29th/Silver Lake Road Bridge - Thanksgiving
9. Spencer Isom - October 1
10. Meeting with John Shardlow on September 11
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 9/11/00
TO: . City Manager Mornson
FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom (k�
RE: Resignation
Please consider this communication as my "letter of resignation" as.the City of St. Anthony's
Assistant City Manager. My last official day will be September 30, 2000. As you know I am
enrolled fulltime in an UofM Doctoral program and have accepted part time employment with
said program. My resigning should give you the opportunity to hire an individual with the full
time availability the Assistant City Manager position requires.
To help you and City staff through this transition, I will be available after September 30 and on
an hourly basis, to assist with the Planning Commission, newsletter, and other projects. Thank
you.