HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 09262000 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIII IIIIIIII
100573
Box: 17
Folder: CC PACKETS 1999-2001
Document: CC PACKET 09262000
Joint Meeting
CITY COUNCIL
SCHOOL BOARD
PARIS COMMISSION
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY-SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING
September 26, 2000
6:00 PM—7:30 PM
City Hall
I. CALL TO ORDER BY MAYOR CAVANAUGH.
II: PRESENTATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CENTRAL PARK AND
SCHEDULE BY CAROL JINDRA, CHAIR OF THE PARKS COMMISSION
AND REPRESENTATIVE FROM BRW, INC.
III. DISCUSSION OF FUNDING OPTIONS FOR CENTRAL PARK. A
REPRESENTATIVE FROM SPRINGSTED, INC. WILL BE PRESENT.
IV. DISCUSSION OF-OTHER LONG-TERM PROJECTS BY THE SCHOOL AND
CITY.
V. OTHER BUSINESS.
PIZZA AND BEVERAGES WILL BE PROVIDED.
--The Regular Council meeting will begin at 7:30PM.--
Design Development Cost Estimate
Central Park Improvement
City of St.Anthony, Minnesota Revised 05/31/2000, 07/05,07/12, 09/12
Construction Limits Area=21.25 acres(City=12.1 acres(57%),School=9.15 acres(43%))
Not Items x.. .A�:° , _ ,_ MUM- Unit`. � �'�- Unit�`C- �. _ ..�-v.�- �-�=,�:.-�, ..,�� �;� �� f:. City Share. �.�,.. School
I Share
_ ! ost ,. TotahAmoun� 9.57e Wte 1_Q, Amoun<< .G ` ,Amount
A. Site Work
1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 1 $ 22,800.00 1 $ 17,200.00
2 Removals LS 1 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 1 $ 28,500.00 1 $ 21,500.00
3 Common Excavation CY 4,950 $ 6.00 $ 29,700.00 2821.5 $ 16,929.00 2128.5 $ 12,771.00
4 Common Borrow Loose Volume CY 6,6501 $ 6.00 $ 39,900.00 3790.5 $ 22,743.00 2859.5 $ 17,157.00
5
Topsoil Borrow(Loose Volume) CY 15,7501 $ 9.00 $ 141,750.00 8977.5 $ 80,797.50 6772.5 $ 60,952.50
6 Modular Block Retaining Wall SF 1200 $ 20.00 $ 24,000.00 1200 $ 24,000.00 0 $ -
B. Parking
7 Conc. Curb and Gutter LF 1200 $ 10.00 $ 12,000.00 1200 $ 12,000.00 0 $ -
8 Bituminous Parking, Complete SY 2,850 $ 20.00 $ 57,000.00 2850 $ 57,000.00 0 $
9 Stripping LS 1 I $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 1 $ 1,500.00 0 $ -
C. Trails
10 8ft.Wide Bit.Trail LF 2430 $ 13.00 $ 31,590.00 1385.1 $ 18,006.30 1044.9 $ 13,583.70
11 10ft. Wide Bit.Trail LF 550 $ 13.00 $ 7,150.00 550 $ 7,150.00 0 $ -
D. Ballfields
D.1. Varsity Baseball
12 A -lime Infield CY 740 $ 22.00 $ 16,280.00 0 $ - 740 $ 16,280.00
13 Backstop Fencing(16 ft) LF 90 $ 110.00 $ 9,900.00 0 $ - 90 $ 9,900.00
14 4 ft high Players Bench Fence LF 40 $ 20.00 $ 800.00 0 $ - 40 $ 800.00
15 8 ft high Outfield Fence LF 1160 $ 30.00 $ 34,800.00 0 $ - 1160 $ 34,800.00
16 Players Bench (Salvaged) EA 2 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 0 $ - 2 $ 200.00
17 Pitcher's Mount EA 1 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 0 $ - 1 $ 250.00
18 Bases EA 4 $ 50.00 $ 200.00 0 $ - 4 $ 200.00
19 Warning Track CF 220 $ 22.00 $ 4,840.00 0 $ - 220 $ 4,840.00
20 Concrete Pad for Bleachers and Players Bench SF 1120 $ 5.00 $ 5,600.00 0 $ - 1120 $ 5,600.00
D.2.Softball(Total =3 fields
21 Bases and Pitchers mount EA 15, $ 50.00 $ 750.00 13 $ 650.00 2 $ 100.00
22 Backstop Fencing 16 ft LF 180 $ 110.00 $ 19,800.00 145 $ 15,950.00 35 $ 3,850.00
23 4 ft high Players Bench Fence LF 390 $ 20.00 $ 7,800.00 ' 300 $ 6,000.00 90 $ 1,800.00
24 Players Bench EA 4 $ 750.00 $ 3,000.00 3 $ 2,250.00 1 $ 750.00
25 Players Bench (Salvaged) EA 2 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 2 $ 200.00
26 Concrete Pad for Bleachers and Players Bench SF 1260 $ 5.00 $ 6,300.00 1000 $ 5,000.00 260 $ 1,300.00
27 Infill A lime CY 1500 $ 22.00 $ 33,000.00 1400 $ 30,800.00 100 $ 2,200.00
D.3.Ice Hockey
28 Permanent Hockey Boards 3.5 ft Ht. LF 540 $ 15.00 $ 8,100.00 290 $ 4,350.00 250 $ 3,750.00
D.4.New Play Area
29 Shelter w/Bathrooms EA 1 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 1 $ 100,000.00 0 $
30 Play Equipment LS 1 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 1 $ 40,000.00 0 $
31 Rubberized Play area SF 4000 $ 13.00 $ 52,000.00 4000 $ 52,000.00 0 $ -
32 Concrete area SF 7480 $ 5.00 $ 37,400.00 7480 $ 37,400.00 0 $
33' Wading Pool (Complete) LS 1 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 1 $ 45,000.00 0 $ -
D.S.Sand Volleyball
Page 1
RENOVATED PARK SHELTER' =•
VAMKM ��
9
WHO (OUSE
NEW PLAY AREA i
RE(Vn�SDLIENTT DMACD
RENOVATED
WADING POOL _�7t
SAND VOLLEYBALL
SHUFFLE BOARD "" \' - / f
� X PAVED'TRA6.-8
ICE HOCKEY y -- J ( FREE SKATING
RECONSTRUCTED PARKINC LOT
m SPAELD x I T I 1 ENHANCED NEIGHBORHOO
„„ ENTRANCE
SOCCER FIELD---- ` ; /� `
S°OrTBALL FIELD / I. SOCCER FlELD \ N `
TYPICAL SPORTS LIGHTING I
5OF75ALL FIELD I
SLED HILL
1\ BACKSTOPS, BLEACHERS
PLAYERS BENCH
TCD BATTinGr GAGES C2) 1
2Wr 11
nnn
®� o
PAVILION �•� � O ° HattMl 1
20 FT X EO FT a 0 190" \ i
\ L aarY
0 Q,
g o
o
II
I
i
CITY CENTER
5OFTBALL FIELD
-
BACKSTOPS, BLEACHERS � __ * � �.✓,�,.;, �-.---�-' :- -, � � I ��
PLAYERS BENCH r_.• _ d„ + 1 I `.,. r..._- - F"_'1(--'-.,� I I
HIGH SCHOOL - ' f ..�,. L�-r:.._._.L_u � , m_ _- ---- •.. a r
SOCCER FIELD
SKATE PARK
(*, �• �r,• -(- //( o I =; 'I , F %RR l//
PRAGT. FOOTBALL
LOW RETAINING WALL a60FT x 360F7)j99�G 31)
(100 LF, 4'-6' HIGH)
1 \ VARSITY BASEBALL
•�
BACKSTOPS,BLEACHERS
PLAYERS BENCH
GRASS INFIELD
7.f�1 1 ;l
ST. ANTHONY HIGH SCHOOL
i
n,
II % �i,
50 25 0 10
SCALE iH FEET
WATER TOWE CENTRAL PARK DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PLAY GROUND , x �� 'L♦ t
(COMPLETED 1999) c MAY 15, 2000 BRW. ING.
♦ `
\ REV MAY 23. 2000 gRW °
_...__.—.. _. ...---..._._...._--.__ �.._ REV. JUNE 10. 2000
-
FINAL- JULY 10. 2000 ADw®�MOOREmoureavxH
.34 Sand Area LS 1 $ 2;000:00 $ 2;000.00 1 $ 2,000.00 0 $
35 Wood Edger LF 180 $ 10.06 $ 1,800.00 180 $` 1,800.00 0 $ -
36 Post%and netting - LS 1 $ 500.00 $ ,500.00 1 $ 500.00: 0
D.6. Shuffleboard(Total_2
- -
'37 Concrete Pad SF 1250 $ 6'.00 $ 7;500.00 1250 $ 7,500.00 _ 0 $
'38 Equipment EA -2 $ 1;000:00 $ 2,000:00 2 $ 2;000.00 0 $ -
E.Softsca e -
39 Deciduous Trees EA 80 $ 350.00 $' 28,000.00 36 :$ 12,600.00 44 $ 15,400.00
40 Ever reen'Trees EA 30 $ 300.00 $ 9;000:00 20 $' 6;000.00 10 $ 3,000.00
41 Shrubs EA 200 $ 50.00 $' 10;000.00 _ 125 $ :6,250.00 75 $ 3,750.00
42 Groundcovers _ EA 120 $ 20:00_ $' 2;400:00 80 $ 1;600.00 40 $ 800:00
43' Sod SY 12500 $ 2.50 $ 31,250.00 5500 $ 13;750.60 7000 $ 17,500.00
44 Seed AC 13 $ 1;800:00 $ .23,400.00 7:41' $ 13,338.00 5.59 $ 10,062.00
45' Vines EA 230,,$ 10.00 $ 2;300:00 0 $ - 230 $ 2,300.00
F.Site Furnishings,
46 Park.Bench EA; 12 '$ 900.00 $ 10,800.00 8 $ 7;200.00 4 $ 3;600:00
47 Litter Receptacle EA 8 $ 700.00. $ _- - 5,600.00 5 $- 3;500:00 3 $ 2„100:00
48 Bike Rack EA 3 $ 500.00 $ 1;500.00 2 $ 1,000:0.0 1 $- 500.00
48 Drinking Fountain EX- 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 1 $ 3,000.00 0 `$ -
50 Park Sign _ EA. '3..$, 1,500.00 $ 4;500.00 3 $ _ 4,500.00 0
51' Batting Cage Foundation& Relocation. EA 21 $ 3,000.00 $ 6,000.00 0 $ - 2 $ 6,000.00
52 Soccer Goal Posts - EA U$ 1,000.00' $ 6,600.00 4 $ 4,000.00 2 $ 2,000:00
G.-Micellaneous
for Multi-use Fields EA 10 $ 20,000.00 $ 200 ,000.00: 9 $ 180,000.00 1 $ 20,000.00
54 Pedestrian Lighting EA 2[$ 000:00 $ 6;000.00 _ _ _ 2 $ 6,000:00 0 $ -
55 Pavillion w/Concession,and Bathroom SF 400 $ :200.00 $' 80,000.00 400 $. 80;000.00 - 0 $ -
56 Irrigation for Varsity Baseball EA 1 _$ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 0 $_ - 1 $ 20,000.00
57 Irri ationformulti-use fields EA 3 $ 25;000:00: $. 75;000.00 _ 2 '$' 50;000:00, 1 $ 25,000.00
58 Bleachers EA 3 $ 51'000:00 $_ 15,000.00 `1' $ 5,000.00 2 $ 10,000.00
59 Parkin Lot Resurfacing(Mill and Overlay), . SY 5000 .$ 6.00 $ W,000:00 5000 '$, 30,000.00 0
60 Parking Lot stripping SY 50001 $ 1:20 .$; 6;000.00 5000 $ 6;000.00 _ 0
61 Ornamental Fencing_at-N/E Park Entrance LF 80F$ 60.00 $ 4;800:00 0 $ - 80 $ 4,800.00
Sub Total $ 1;455,160.00 $ 1,078,563680 $` 376,596.20
Contingency(10%q) $ 145,516:00 $ 107;856:38 $ 37;659.62
Grand Total $ 1,600,676.00 $ 1,186,420.8 $ 414,255:82
30' Includes new pool;foundation, mechanical,connection, electHcal and all',related pool"construction.
44' Includes 3 ft.wide on both sides of trail,varsity base ball'infield and outfield only.
45` Vines.:along perimeter fence of varsity field.
51' Batting Cages(1 2'xl 5'x75')with chain link and netting inside cage for protection.
'Note 1 Project'Elenients added to project since.1999 Concept Plan.
Page 2
Central Park Implementation gRW
404MFSl MOM GROUP COMPANY
Key Decision Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
A. Oct. 10. City Council Decides ,
Phasing, Approves Plan &
Orders Construction Docs.
B. Prepare Const. Documents
& Engineers Estimate
C. Park Commission Approves
Construction Docs.
D. City Council Approves
Bid Letting
E. Bid Letting & Award
F. Construction
Repeat Steps A. thru F. if
Additional Phases
OBRW 08.00
ii = Parks Commission Sign-Off = City Council Decision
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 8, 2000
TO:.' Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: CENTRAL PARK PROJECT/FUNDING
As directed by you, I have come up with a possible financial plan to pay for the $1.6
million dollar Central Park Project with zero increases in taxes and full utilization of
budget reserves.
The proposed funding sources for Central Park are as follows:
1) $585,000 - General Obligation Bond (Abate Evergreen Townhomes)
The debt associated with the Evergreen Soil Correction District has been defeased. The
District can now be decertified (expires is 2001) and established as a Tax Abatement
Parcel.
Revenues from the property are sufficient to fund the$585,000 General Obligation
Bond based on a minimum School abatement of$29,000 as shown by the Springsted
analysis. If the School abates more, which they can, the bond issue can be increased
and the City wouldn't have to use as much reserves.
2) $250,000 - General Fund Reserves
Previously, these reserves were set aside for budget contingencies for potential losses in
revenue in State Aid (LGA/HACA) and Liquor Profits.
3) $100,000 - Parks Grant (State Amateur Grant).,
4) $665,000- Funding from the Water Filtration Fund..
As part of the Springsted Debt Study, an analysis was performed to identify available
water filtration funds without jeopardizing funding for operation and maintenance or
plant replacement costs. _Funds totaling $1,000,000 were identified as useable.
It should be noted that the Water Filtration Funds have been invested in long-term
investments with the intention of preserving capital while using the interest earnings to
pay for the operation and maintenance of the GAC Plant. To make these funds available
for the Central Park Project without losses in principal, liquidation of investments m
would occur over the next several months.
85 E. SEVENTH PLACE,SUITE 100
SAINT PAUL,MN 55101-2887
651-223-3000 FAX:651-223-3002 SPRINGSTED
Public Finance Advisors
EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM
TO: St. Anthony City and School District
FROM: Robert D. Thistle
DATE: September 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Central Park
The City of St. Anthony and the School District are exploring alternatives to jointly finance
improvements to Central Park. The total cost of those improvements is estimated to be $1.6
million.
There are basically five options currently under consideration:
1. Cash on Hand
2. Internal Loan/Low Interest
3. Tax Abatement
4. Referendum
5. Cash and Abatement
Option 1: Cash
The use of cash on hand may be used if the accumulation of funds is consistent
with policy needs of the..' ity and that the use of such funds does not jeopardize
other financial requirements, needs or obligations. The City does have under
consideration the use of approximately $665,000 from the Water Filtration Fund,
which funds are not vital to the general operations, maintenance and replacement
costs of the plant. The choice is whether or not to spend those funds for this
projector other projects. The City also is expecting to use $100,000 in grant funds
from the State.
Option 2: Internal Loan
The City could loan the funds to the project to be repaid over the same 15 year
term as the abatement bonds. However, any repayment would have to come from
available funds of the City and School District and would not be construed to be a
special levy. Further, the interest rate on a $1 million loan would be approximately
3.0% assuming an annual revenue of$84,796. That stream at 0% interest
would support a loan of_$1.,270,000:
SAINT PAUL,MN • MINNEAPOLIS,MN • MILWAUKEE,WI • OVERLAND PARK,KS • WASHINGTON,DC • DES MOINES,IA
St. Anthony City and School District
September 11, 2000
Page 2
Option 3: Tax Abatement
Tax abatement is the use of taxes generated from specific tax parcels to pay for
designated costs. The taxes are collected in the normal process, not returned to
the taxpayer.
The City has two Tax Increment Financing Districts which will close in 2000 and
2001. The increment generated from these districts is currently being collected by
the City to pay prior eligible costs of the TIF district. Neither the City nor the
School District has had access to this tax revenue for their general operations. It is
anticipated that those taxes would now be abated for the Central Park Project.
The Captured Value of the Walbon and Evergreen TIF Districts is $97,794. Based
on the current tax rates of only the City and School District, the taxes generated is
$84,796.
City Tax $29,689
School District Tax 55,107
$84,796
Based on the above, we-have calculated the amount of debt amortized over 15
years which would be who lly.supported by the abatement revenue generated.
Maximum Mid Range Minimum
Contribution 100% / 100%' 100% /75% 100% /54%
City $ 29,689 $ 29,689 $ 29,689
School District 55,107 41,300 29.689
Total Revenue $ 84,796 $ 71,019 $ 59,378
Bond Issue Available $870,000 $730,000 $610,000
Estimated Tax Impact
$150,000 House
City $ 11.44 $ 11.44 $11.44
School District. $ .17.62 $ 13.21 $ 9.49
$500,000 Commercial Property
City $ 89.51 $ 89.51 $89.51
School District $137.88 $105.41 $74.28
$250,000 Apts (4 or more units)
City $'.:34.64 $ 34.64 $34.64
School District $ 53.37 $ 40.03 $38.75
St. Anthony City and School District
September 11, 2000
Page 3
In order to establish an abatement district, a plan needs to be prepared and a public
hearing held. Both the City and School:District need to hold a hearing this meeting
could be a joint hearing at a joint meeting of the City Council and School Board.
Each entity would be required to pass a resolution approving the plan.
Option 4: Referendum
The City and School District could conduct a referendum whereby a majority of
votes cast on the question would be required to issue the debt.
Option 5: Cash and Abatement
As noted heretofore, the use of abatement only will not fully support a bond issue
which would generate $1.6 million in available funds for the project. The City could
either make an initial cash contribution from its water trust fund and/or other
available funds to make up the difference or it could pledge future allocations to
make up the difference between .abatement revenue and required debt service.
Depending on the mix of abatement,-an initial contribution from available sources
would range from $730,000 to $990,000. Annual contributions would range from
$70,915 to $96,335 for the term of the financing. The City and School District may
elect to share in the contribution of this shortfall. _
We would be pleased to continue to work with the City and School District in the preparation of
data needed for the public hearing and the implementation of the project.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY SCHOOL DISTRICT
DRAFT OF PROPOSED TIMELINE
ADOPTION OF PLAN; NOTICE ABATEMENT HEARING; .
JOINT HEARING; BOND ISSUE SCHEDULE
Abatement Authority 469.1813
Timeline
Schedule of dates to be Notes
Activity determined after 9/26/00
meeting
Adoption of Plan
Draft Abatement Publication of notice of
Agreement(bond counsel) hearing at least 10 days but
not less than 30 days before.
Adoption of Abatement
Resolution
School Board Meeting
City Council Meeting
Notice of Public Hearing St. Anthony Bulletin,
Publication IWICs, Publication Notice
Joint Hearing
Bond Issue
Set Sale
Sale
The Waubun TIF District is scheduled to be closed in 2001, but does not expire until
2011 unless closed.
The City Council would read resolution to close district.
City of St. Anthony
10 Year Capital Improvements:
(Currently Authorized)
Flood Mitigation ( 100 Yr. Protection: $ 10,000,000
Funding Sources include a mix of:
Bonds — Street az Sewer
DNR Grants
FEMA
Stormwater Fees
(Proposed/Not-Authorized)
Central Park: $ 1 ,600,000
Potential Funding Sources:
G.O. Bond (Abate Evergreen) $585,000
General Fund Reserves $250,000
State Amateur Grant $ 100,000
Water Filtration Reserves $665,000
Public Works Building: $ 6,000,000
Potential Funding Sources:
Referendum — Tax Levy
Fire Station: $ 1 "500"000
Potential Funding Sources:
Referendum — Tax Levy
Off-Sale Liquor Store: $ 1 ,000,000
Potential Funding Sources:
Liquor Revenue Bonds
Liquor Profits
(Funding Plan in Place)
Capital Equipment: (5-Yearl $ 2,800,000
Funding Sources:
Annual Capital Equipment General Fund Transfer
Police Contracts & Reserves
Liquor Profits
Water/Sewer Fund Balance
General Fund Reserves
Charitable Gambling
Equipment Certificates
Trade/Sale of Existing Equipment
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $22,900,000
9/20/2000 ESTIMATED
CAPITAL OUTLAY
AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS
ISD 282
Gymnastics and Fitness Center HS/MS $ 600,000
Reconstruction of front sidewalks and railings HS/MS $ 58,000
Add new pumps to heating system HS/MS $ 45,000
Replace shut-off valves in tunnels for hot and cold water supply HS/MS $ 65,000
Floor treatment for girls pool locker room HS/MS $ 6,279
Floor treatment for boys pool locker room HS/MS $ 6,891
Improvement of building restrooms HS/MS $ 65,000
Parking lot pavement maintenance HS/MS $ 132,000
Replace wall tile in gym with finished texture HS/MS $ 16,000
Replace electrical wiring on football field HS/MS $ 14,206
Upgrade water service to building HS/MS $ 20,000
Additional outside lighting of middle schol entrance HS/MS $ 11,000
Aircondition rooms 309 & 311 computer lab HS/MS $ 20,000
Replace drinking fountains with cooler type HS/MS $ 22,000
Replace carpet in auditorium HS/MS $ 14,000
Replace stage curtain in auditorium HS/MS $ 40,000
Expand parking lot area WP $ 15,000
Add kindergarten restroom (Room.105) WP $ 6,000
Install fence on east side of playground WP $ 10,000
Replacement of playground equipment WP $ 15,000
Replace faucets through out Wilshire Park WP $ 25,000
Replace ceiling tile in kitchen WP $ 1,000
Relocate District Office, convert existing location to instructional space DW $ 65,000
Relocate roof lighting up above roof line HS/MS $ 6,000
Remodel M.S. storage room (room 111)for classroom HS/MS $ 28,000
Remodel weight room for storage space HS/MS $ 25,000
Construction of garage HS/MS $ 150,000
three new doors on north side of gym & pool HS/MS $ 20,000
Painting of all classrooms HS/MS $ 65,000
Remodel Industrial Tech Area HS/MS $ 70,000
New bathroom stall dividers WP $ 10,000
Roofing projects and maintenance (3-5 years out) HS/MS $ 150,000
Replace MS lockers HS/MS $ 42,000
Replace water& gas fixtures in 215,207,205,203. Upgrade electrical, replace counter tops HS/MS $ 105,000
Page 1
9/20/2000 ESTIMATED
CAPITAL OUTLAY
AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS
ISD 282
Improvements to locker room areas HS/MS $ 3,000
Kitchen renovations HS/MS $ 120,000
Painting lockers in high school or replacement HS/MS $ 80,000
Repair/reface cabinets in 102, 104, 106, 107, 115, 117,118,119 HS/MS $ 8,000
Repair/reface cabinets in room 201, 210, 220 HS/MS $ 8,000
Repair/reface cabinets in rooms 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 306 HS/MS $ 8,000.
Repair/reface cabinets in rooms 307,309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314,316 HS/MS $ 8,000
Replace ceiling tiles in rooms 115, 119, 215, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, and foyer HS/MS $ 32,000
Recover auditorium seats (745 seats) HS/MS $ 60,000
Music Room Demo, add office HS/MS $ 3,536
Replace floor tile in high school classrooms HS/MS $ 26,000
Video monitoring system for entry and hallways HS/MS $ 12,000
Pavement of stadium dirt track HS/MS $ 40,000
Replace lighting in rooms 306,308,312 HS/MS $ 16,000
Room darkening shades for all of windows and doors in media center HS/MS $ 6,000
Replace kitchen counters in FACS room HS/MS $ 4,000
Replace ceiling tiles in special ed suite HS/MS $ 3,000
Replace patio doors in rooms 135 and 136 WP $ 7,000.
Install airconditioning in Special Ed suite WP $ 20,000
Replace tile in gym with finished texture (STO) WP $ 9,000
Replace light poles &fixtures in parking lot WP $ 3,000
Painting gym WP $ 6,200
Add up to 24 additional parking spaces WP $ 30,000
Replace old ceiling the through out building WP $ 15,000
Painting classrooms WP $ 19,885
New gym floor at Wilshire Park WP $ 160,000
TOTAL LONG TERM FACILITIES REQUESTS $ 2,650,997
DISTRICTWIDE TECHNOLOGY NEEDS $ 500,000
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS $ 3,150,997
Page 2
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 00-080
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT
AND-ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted June 27, 2000, a report was
prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc. with reference to the improvement of:
• Wilson Street from 29`h Avenue NE to 30`h Avenue NE
• West Armour Terrace from Roosevelt Street to Silver Lake Road
• 30' Avenue NE from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost-effective,sand feasible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
1) will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report at an
estimated total cost of the improvement of$1,576,100.00.
2) hereby designates WSB & Associates, Inc as the engineer for this improvement. They
shall prepare plans and specifications for'making such improvements.
Adopted this day of , 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ORDINANCE 2000-010
AN,ORDINANCE RELATING TO A MORATORIUM ON CHANGES IN THE USE
OF PROPERTIES KNOWN AS ST. ANTHONY VILLA_ GE NORTHWEST
DESCRIBING THE 250 ACRE SITE BOUNDED BY 37TH AVENUE NE
ON THE SOUTH, THE CITY CORPORATE LIMITS ON THE NORTH,
SILVER LAKE ROAD ON THE EAST, AND THE CORPORATE
LIMITS ON THE WEST AND ENCOMPASSES PROPERTIES KNOWN AS
THE APACHE PLAZA AND THE SALVATION ARMY CAMP
The City Council of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota, ordains:
Section 1. Section 1330.01. of the City Code is hereby amended to read in full as follows:
1330.01 Purpose. Pursuant to applicable Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to authority
and direction from the Council, the City will be conducting studies for the purpose of
considering amendment of its official controls, as defined in Minnesota Statues, Section
462.52, Subd. 15, to address the potential future use or uses of the property in the City
known as the St. Anthony Village Northwest, describing the 250 acre site bounded by
37' Avenue NE on the south, the City corporate limits on the north, Silver Lake Road
on the east,and the corporate limits on the west and encompasses properties known as
the Apache Plaza and the Salvation Army Camp. The studies will consider what
amendments of the City's comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances may be
appropriate to address the potential future use or uses of said St. Anthony Village
Northwest properties. It is possible that while amendments and.new official controls are
being considered by the City, proposals and applications could be made with respect to
such property for rezoning, conditional use permits, or permits for construction of
buildings. Therefore, in order to protect the planning process and the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of the City of St. Anthony, it is necessary and desirable to
impose the moratorium set forth in Section-1330.04 pursuant to the authority granted by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subd. 4.
Section 2. Section 1330.04, Subd. 1 of the City Code is hereby amended to read in full as
follows:
Subd. 1. Applications for Rezoning or Permits. For a period of one year from the
effective date of this Ordinance (subject to earlier termination or extension by the City
Council) the City Council, Planning Commission, Building Official, Board of
Adjustments and Appeals, and City staff of the City of St. Anthony shall not grant any
permits or rezoning or other authorization for changes in use, or accept any applications
or requests for changes in the use, for the property in the City known as St. Anthony
Village Northwest, describing the 250 acre site bounded by 37" Avenue NE on the
south, the City corporate limits on the north, Silver Lake Road on the east and the
Ordinance 2000-010
Page 2
corporate limits on the west, which encompasses properties known as Apache Plaza and .
Salvation Army Camp properties, or for the construction of any building; or addition to
or alteration of any building, on said property, except as provided in Subd. 2 of this
Section. The exceptions to this would be the Pizza Hut building and the property along
37`h Avenue NE between Silver Lake Road and Stinson Boulevard NE
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in effect as of the date of its publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Adopted:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
_H.R.A. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
•
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 26, 2000
7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER.
H. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
III. ROLL CALL.
IV. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR
AGENDA
V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
• VI. COMMUNITY FORM.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the
regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name
and address for the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes.
Generally the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this
time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that
the matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA. ................................................................. 1 - 19
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will
be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL - None.
X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF. ............... ...........20 - 33
A. Planning Commission- September 19, 2000.
• 1. Village North LLP and Apache Animal Medicine; subdivision/final plat
approval.
• City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
September 26, 2000
Page 2
B. Review Planning Proposal for Apache Plaza and Salvation Army Camp
with John Shradlow Firm and Jim Prosser from the Ehlers Firm. Review
and discuss letter to Hennepin County Parks.
C. Discuss funding plan for Central Park redevelopment.
D. Report from Todd Hubmer WSB.
1. Resolution accepting feasibility report and ordering plans and
specifications for 2001 Street Project.
2. General engineering updates.
XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. ..................................34 - 39
XIH. ADJOURNMENT.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council Meeting Minutes—September 12, 2000
2. Licenses/Permits
3. Claims
•
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
• CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 September 12, 2000
4 8: 00 p.m.
5 I. CALL TO ORDER.
6 Mayor Cavanaugh called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m.
7 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
8 Mayor Cavanaugh invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
9
10 III. ROLL CALL.
11 Councilmembers present: Mayor Cavanaugh; Councilmembers Thuesen, Horst and Hodson
12 Councilmembers absent: Amy Sparks
13 Also present: City Manager Michael Momson; City Attorney William Soth.
14 IV. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 12,2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
15 AGENDA.
16 Motion by Hodson to approve the September 12, 2000 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda as
17 presented.
• Motion carried unanimously.
19 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
20 A. Proclamation Declaring Kiwanis"Peanut Day".
21 Mayor Cavanaugh noted that the Kiwanis Club of St. Anthony is an organization dedicated to
22 helping community youths educationally and spiritually and in order to raise funds for its many
23 and varied programs, the Kiwanis Club of St. Anthony has requested a day be set aside in St.
24 Anthony Village for the sale of peanuts.
25 Therefore, it was resolved that the St. Anthony City Council hereby designates Friday,
26 September 22, 2000, as St. Anthony Kiwanis.Peanut Day.
27 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
28 Cavanaugh announced that Councilmember Horst, through a local article,had invited members
29 of the community to express opinions regarding the recent Council decision to deny the Apache
30 Plaza redevelopment.
31 In that respect, Cavanaugh invited members of the audience to address the Council.
32 Sue Kozarek, 4029 Shamrock Drive, would like to request that the Councilmembers reconsider
33 the vote against Apache Plaza. She read a prepared statement and noted that the Apache Plaza
has been in decline since the tornado many years ago. .She is confused why the decision was
made against Apache Plaza because the City had'hired consultants that were in favor of the Plan,
36. a recognized developer, as well as the approval of the Council-approved Planning Commission.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Page 2
1 She reminded the Councilmembers that there is.still a flooding problem in that area, and that the
2 developer offered a solution to that problem. She urged the Councilmembers to reconsider the
3 decision.
4 Sally Haag, 2901 Silver Lake Court, has been a resident for many years and has served on the
5 Council before. She would like to support the Councilmembers who turned down the Apache
6 Plaza redevelopment. She would be nervous to see this development go forward. She believes
7 the Council should take an overall look at things and encourages the Council to develop a
8 healthier plan that would support the individuals that are looking for housing near the City in a'
9 good-quality residential community that has the services to support them. She believes this
10 would even out the tax base.
11 John Madden, 3701 Foss Road, served on the Kenzie Terrace Task Force, amongst others, and
12 was on the Planning Commission for several years. He inquired what the tax valuation is for
13 Apache. City Manager Michael Morrison said.the valuation is about$5 million dollars, and pays
14 about$1 million in taxes. Mr. Madden felt the problem with Apache has been studied for too
15 long, and he was disappointed that the City did not take the advice of the City's hired consultants
16. or the Planning Commission, and he encouraged the City to reconsider its vote.
1'T Jerry Faust, 4033 Silver Lake Terrace;and he would like to ask the Council to reconsider the
18 vote against Apache Plaza. He spent six years on the Planning Commission, and four years on
19 the City Council. He noted that the economic times are good now and that this was the best de-
20 velopment offer that had been offered to the City as of this date. He does not believe that alter-
21 nate courses are feasible and that all of the City's consultants and advisors have encouraged the
22 City to go forward with the project. He would believe that their advice is valid. Regarding the
23 TIF money, Mr. Faust explained that the Apache Project needed some assistance from the City to
24 make the project work. He noted that there is always room for compromise and would ask the
25 Councilmembers to reconsider the Apache Plaza`redevelopment project.
26 Tom Miller, President of the Anthony Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber was dis-
27 appointed regarding the vote for Apache. It was the Chamber's understanding that the City
28 Attorney and City's consultants, as well as the Planning Commission, were in favor of the pro-
29 ject. The Chamber was under the impression that the Council was in favor of the project as well.
30 After the vote, the Chamber wrote a letter to the Mayor expressing their disappointment about
31 the vote, and received a letter back from the Mayor, but their questions were not answered. On
32 behalf of the Chamber, Mr. Miller requested that the Council reconsider the decision.
33 George.Wagner, 3407 Fordham Court, noted that he has spoken with the Council before ex-
34 pressing his support for the Apache Project. He was surprised that the Council did not heed the
advice of the City's consultants, after hiring so'me,of the best consultants in the business. He was
concerned about the waste of taxpayer's money in hiring professionals to research the project and
37 offer advice to the City. He did not feel it was the proper representation to the taxpayers. He
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
• September 12,2000
Page 3
1 agreed with a resident that spoke earlier that retail,has not been successful in Apache, and he
2 agreed with another resident that the Council.should reconsider the development of Apache
3 Plaza. Furthermore, Mr. Wagner stated that Apache Plaza already had a prospective tenant, of
4 which such tenant spoke at the prior Council meeting. Mr. Wagner requested that the Council
5 reconsider the project as representatives of the community.
6 Jeanette Dick, 3519 NE Harding, stated the Apache issue has been discussed over many months.
7 She mentioned that the issue of trucks coming in and out of the property was a concern to some
8 Councilmembers. She noted that the Cub Food store has trucks in and out, and when Apache
9 was doing business, there were trucks in and out of that property as well. She hoped that the
10 Councilmembers would reconsider and stated that the residents of St. Anthony deserve more.
11 George Marks, former Councilmember, noted that Apache represents a development opportunity
12 for St. Anthony, as well as a sort of spirit of&town. So many comments have been received
13 over the years about the residents wishing for something at Apache. Something that is standing
14 in the way, he believes, is called a "council process." He believes that this issue was not carried
15 through completely, that more negotiation was possible, and he hoped the Council would re-open
16 this issue. He urged the Council to take a whole new view of the issue and not be tied to
anything that has been written or said prior to this date. He offered some advice to the Coun- .
18 cilmembers due to his past experiences as a Planning Commissioner and a former
19 Councilmember. He hoped that the Councilmembers would try to hold their opinions about the
20 project until it has been completely reviewed and researched. He noted that the City needs an
21 additional tax capability, and the sooner a viable project can be developed at Apache, the better
22 off the City,will be. He urged the Councilmembers to reconsider the project.
23 Bob Manske, 3516 Hardin Ste,has lived in the community a long time and has been on the
24 School Board as well. He was very disappointed'in the Council's decision regarding Apache, and
25 offered advice to the newer members of the Council based on his past experience. He noted that
26 the Councilmembers must rely on the professional staff that are hired to serve the City. As a
27 Councilmember, it would be impossible to know everything about issues, and it is important to
28 accept that the City has good counsel and consultants, and he believed the Council should take
29 that advice and move forward with the reconsideration of Apache Plaza.
30 Ted Severson, 2504 33rd Avenue, is President of the St. Anthony Soccer Club,which gives him
31 a position on the Sports Boosters. He understands that the Parks Commission will be discussing
32 the Central Park redevelopment with the Council. He runs the soccer program, and there are
33 about 700 kids in the program. He would like to point out to the Council that when Silver Point
34 Park, considerable field space was lost due to the need for water drainage. He wanted to request
35 that when the Council reviews the plan that is'.proposed by the Parks Commission, that it be kept
in mind what needs to be done to obtain the maximum space.
City Council.Regular Meeting Minutes
• September 12, 2000
Page 4
I Shawn Egly, Silver Lake Road, inquired about ilhe ordinance for noise. On August 26, 2000,
2 . jackhammers were being operated at 7:00 a.m. for the new bridge on a weekend morning.
3 Mornson stated that he believed the ordinance was 9:00 a.m. for weekends, however, he would
4 check into that and would also speak to the contractor.
5 Cavanaugh noted that this was the largest turnout for the community forum. He appreciated all
6 of the comments everyone had, and noted that similar comments have been received by the
7 Councilmembers at home. He stated that the Council voted based on the knowledge that they
8 had acquired, and that decisions were made.
9 Karen Cole, 200 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, approached the Council and stated that she
10 represents Frontline Church. She would like to have an opportunity to make a presentation to
11 the Council. Cavanaugh noted that the Councilwould address this issue further in the agenda
12 and would then hear from a representative.
13 VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
14 Motion by Hodson to approve the Consent Agenda which consisted of:
• 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of August 22, 2000;
16 2. Licenses and Permits; and
17 3. Claims.
18 Motion carried unanimously.
19 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
20 A. Resolution 00-067 re: Set Proposed 2001 Tax Lew and City Budget and Resolution 00
21 068 re: Authorize Tax Rate Increase. .. .
22 Cavanaugh asked for a report from City Manager Michael Mornson. He noted that by September
23 15;2000, each "taxing authority" must adopt a proposed budget for payable 2001 and certify a
24 proposed property tax levy to the County Auditor.
25 -
26 Mornson reviewed that the entire budget process has been reformatted this year. This is actually
27 the fourth time the Council has reviewed the figures. He introduced Roger Larson, Finance
28 Director, and mentioned that Mr. Larson would be available to answer questions. Mornson con-
29 tinued that the budget would be set at$1,763,475.00, which is a 7% increase over last year's
30 levy. The reasons for this is because of an inflationary increase, annual VillageFest contribution,
31 addition of a Park Maintenance employee, increase in the fire budget, and other things.
32 Mornson reviewed in detail the budget as submitted in the Council's packages and noted certain.
additions or deletions.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Page 5
I Mayor Cavanaugh opened the Public Hearing of 8:47 p.m. and invited comments from the audi-
2 ence. Cavanaugh noted that the levy will be increased by 7%,but he could not elaborate at this
3 point on how that would impact the residents.
4 Hearing no response from the audience, Cavanaugh closed the public hearing at 8:49 p.m.
5 Motion by Thuesen to approve Resolution 00-067, a Resolution Setting the City of St. Anthony
6 Proposed 2001 Tax Levy and Budget in Compliance with the Truth in Taxation Act.
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8 Horst stated it should be noted that there are items that go into this levy review as to why the
9 levy is going up, and also this is the maximum that the Council is setting and has the possibility
10 to go down if necessary. In other words, this levy is being set as a target. Further, Horst wished
11 to note that 7%is a rather modest increase and in looking at neighboring communities, it can
12 range as high was 29%. Additionally, in the City's budgeting process for this year,there have
13 been some decreases as well. He noted that he is not interested in cutting funding to Police and
1 Fire and that this is an issue that should be discussed further.
15 Hodson asked for Mr. Larson to show the residents the levy survey
16 Thuesen noted that a 7.0% levy increase, in comparison to the metro area, is reasonable. Further,
17 he noted that the budget was adjusted downward and that cuts were made in areas of public
18 safety (proposed). He believes that issue needed to be discussed about the merits and wisdom of
19 cuts. He noted that a person's taxes could go higher,but that would be based on the valuation.
20 He realizes that no one wants to pay more taxes,but as valuations rise, it is a sign of a healthy
21 community.
22 Horst inquired when the proper time would be to discuss the cuts in certain departments.
23 Mornson recommended that the Council should hold a work session to discuss those issues fur- .
24 ther.
25 Thuesen agreed with Mornson's recommendation because it was obvious that all of the Council-
26 members are not on the same page with this issue. Horst noted he felt uncomfortable with a
27 budget that reduces the fire and police department's funds. He thinks the public would be inter-
28 ested in those figures as well.
29 Cavanaugh stated that since many residents were.Jn attendance, he would hold a discussion on
30 this issue now. He continued by reviewing for-the residents the process of producing the budget
and the expenses and revenues expected. He expressed his option that the community should be
involved in the budget process and noted that he would welcome a discussion from the depart-
33 ment heads.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Page 6
1 Thuesen asked if the fire department's budget met all of the OSHA requirements. Morrison
2 stated that those requirements have been met.
3 Hodson related some concerns over,the figures presented on the budget. He stated he would like
4 for the department heads not to have to come back to the Council and have figures approved, but
5 rather he would personally count on the City Manager to handle the budgets for the department
6 heads.
7 Horst noted that he has talked to the police department, and that department feels that more funds.
8 could be utilized, and the same response was obtained from the fire department chief.
9 Cavanaugh explained that all the departments were funded and even so,the City did not have a .
10 large amount of reserves.
11 Thuesen noted that even though the departments are funded, he would like to see appropriate
12 funds allocated to the service departments.
13 Cavanaugh responded that the budgets were approved by the City Manager, and Thuesen noted .
that the City Manager was simply reacting to a directive given by the Council on a divided vote.
15 Morrison responded by explaining the prior practices of the budget process and prior Council di-
16 rections, and the reason for the type of budget that is being presented this year. He explained in
17 detail the process that Staff works with to arrive at the budget.
18 Horst inquired if an alternate plan for Apache would be considered, where would those funds
19 come from. Mornson noted that any funds would come from the H.R.A. project funds.
20 Motion by Hodson to approve Resolution 00-068, a Resolution Authorizing a Tax Rate Increase
21 for the 2000 Tax Levy, Collectible 2600.
22 Motion carried unanimously.
23 IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
24 A. Frontline Church Ordinance Amendment.Request.
25 Cavanaugh asked for a report from the Planning Commission. Chair Bergstrom of the Planning
26 Commission approached the Council and reviewed the application by Frontline Church. Mr.
27 Bergstrom noted that the request by the Church was to amend the City's permitted uses in com-
28 mercial districts. Currently, churches are not an allowable use in a commercial district, but only
29 in a residential district. Mr. Bergstrom noted that the Planning Commission had significant con- .
cerns because if the request would be approved, it would apply to all of the commercial districts
in the City, not just the Frontline Church property. Mr. Bergstrom noted that the Commissioners
32 had a long discussion about the impact of a church within a commercial district.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Page 7
1
2 Mr. Bergstrom was clear to state that the Planning Commission's denial of Frontline Church's re-
3 quest was not in any way directed towards the Church personally, in fact, the Commission
4 thought that the Church would make an excellent addition to the City. However,the Planning
5 Commission put together findings against the proposal and those findings are noted on page 3 of
6 the Planning Commission's July 18, 2000 meeting minutes.
7 Cavanaugh inquired of City Attorney Soth if he felt the findings were appropriate. Mr. Soth
8 noted that the findings appeared to be in order.
9 Karen Cole, a representative of Frontline Church, approached the Council and requested that the
to Council consider the Church's application. She felt that the Planning Commission's findings
l 1 were unfounded. She also stated that part of the building that would be used for the Church
12 would also be used as a storage facility and thus would be part of the taxable base of the City.
13 Additionally, she felt the Planning,Commission's concern that the Church would not provide a
14 viable tax base for the City was riot'a legitimate reason for a religious use. She proposed that the
15 use of the property would be appropriate for Frontline Church and she would urge the City to
have control over future projects as opposed to the blanket definition of changing the precedent
1'f for the entire City.
18 Ms. Cole noted that she believed the Church would be a tremendous asset to the City, and the
19 Church would also be donating a 4-foot wide easement to the City for use as a walkway to the St.
20 Anthony Shopping Center in the future planS." Additionally, she noted that the Church would be
21 willing to work with the City with a conditional use permit in a form in which the City would .
22 approve. She additionally requested that the Council consider the Church's application.
23 Horst inquired about the potential use of the property as a taxable base. Ms. Cole stated that
24 typically, Churches are not taxable,.however the Church would rent out a portion of the property
25 for a commercial use. Horst asked.for elaboration. Ms. Cole stated that the building would be
26 utilized as storage. Horst responded that storage is not a permitted use except in light industrial
27 districts.
28 Horst asked for some clarification from City Attorney Soth. Mr. Soth said a property can be tax
29 exempt, however, taxes must be paid for a portion that is used for a noncharitable purposes.
30 However,he was not sure that storage would.be.in compliance. Mr. Soth wished to clarify some
31 points. If the amendment to the zoning ordinance would be approved by the Council, there is a
32 presumption that a church use would be permitted in all commercial districts. Under certain cir-
33 cumstances, a conditional use permit could be denied, but the presumption would be with the ap-
plicant that the applicant is entitled to the conditional use permit. To be clear, it would not be
correct to assume that a permit could be denied in other areas once the amendment to zoning is
36 approved.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Page 8
1 Mr. Soth continued by commenting on the Planning Commission's findings of fact no. 2 and 4,
2 and felt those two findings were the most significant.
3 Thuesen noted that the Council needs to determine the focus of the area of property in question.
4 In particular, Thuesen was concerned about the type of storage that was mentioned earlier.
5 Another representative from Frontline Church noted that the type of storage had not yet been
6 determined. Thuesen noted that he felt that the Church would make an excellent neighbor,how-
7 ever, he felt that the Council needed to determine the goal for that property and continue from
8 that point.
9 Horst inquired about the parking space available. Ms. Cole responded that currently there are 77
10 spaces available, and this would appear to be adequate for the families that are members of the
1 Church.
12 Horst inquired about the appeal of the particular building in question. The Associate Pastor
13 spoke and stated that their current location in Roseville is close to St. Anthony and the Church
14 felt that they could present an asset to the community, as well as revitalize the building and the
area.
16 Horst noted that in his experience, he had learned that "spot zoning" is not recommended as a
17 general rule.
18 Cavanaugh noted that a change in the zoning for a City is a large undertaking and he further ex-
19 plained the findings of the Planning Commission.
20 . Thuesen noted that although this decision is painful, the City needed to move forward with the
21 renovation of the St. Anthony Shopping Center;and that the Council should heed the advice of
22 the City's attorney about changing the precedence of the zoning ordinance.
23 Motion by Horst to Approve Resolution 00-059, a Resolution Relating to a Request to Amend
24 the Zoning Ordinance, which in agreement with-the findings of the Planning Commission at their
25 July 18, 2000 meeting,the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby denies the request for
26 the zoning ordinance amendment submitted by Frontline Church.
27 Motion carried unanimously,
28 B. Resolution 00-065 re: Emergency Vehicle Preemption.
29 Cavanaugh asked for a report from City Manager Momson. Mornson reviewed for the Council
that S.E.H. had been asked in March 2000,1to appropriate $65,000.00 for the installation of an
emergency vehicle pre-emption system at the eight signalized intersections within the City.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Page 9
1 Cavanaugh expressed his support of the project,.and Thuesen echoed his comments. Thuesen
2 noted that time is of the essence in facilitating emergency response times and he fully supported
3 the project.
4 Joel Hewitt, Fire Chief, addressed the Council noted the excellent features of the Opticom system
5 and felt that the figures that were presented to the Council were accurate figures.
6 Hodson noted he would support the project at all odds and commended the fire and police de-
7 partments for pulling the project together.
8 Motion by Thuesen to approve Resolution 00-065, a Resolution Relating to Emergency Vehicle .
9 Pre-emption.
10 Motion carried unanimously.
11 C. Resolution 00-078 re: Livable Communities Act.
12 Motion by Hodson to approve Resolution 00-078, a Resolution Electing to Continue Participat-
13 ing in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program Under the Metropolitan Livable Commu-
nities Act for calendar year 2001.
15 Motion carried unanimously.
16 D. Resolution 00-079 re: City's Participation in the Building Qualities Communities Effort.
17 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-079,'a Resolution Approving Participation in the
-18 Building Qualities Communities Effort.
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20 E. Discussion of Funding Option for Central Park.
21 Cavanaugh requested a report from City Manager Mornson. In this respect, Mornson presented a
22 memorandum dated August 8, 2000, which depicted a possible financial plan to pay for the $1.6
23 million dollar Central Park Project with zero increases in taxes and full utilization of budget re-
24 serves.
25 Mornson asked for the Councilmembers to review the figures and presentation, and to come to.an
26 agreement over what would be discussed at the joint meeting with the School Board and Parks
27 Commission to be held September 26, 2000.
28 Cavanaugh mentioned that he would like to hear from Hennepin County on the project.
Horst noted the increase in Central Park's budget and he would like to review and discuss the
3o proposal in detail.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Page 10
1 Morrison noted that there would be consultants available at the joint meeting to present the pro-
2 posal in detail as well as a financial consultant to discuss the impact to the City regarding the
3 funding. Morrison said he believed that construction was anticipated to begin in the spring of
4 2001, with the project being a two-year commitment.
5 Horst acknowledged that the total figure exceeded his anticipated estimates by about$600,000._
6 Thuesen was able to explain some issues to Horst since he had attended the Parks Commission
7.. meeting on September 11, 2000; however, he noted that some of the issues would be better pre-
8 sented by the Parks Commission and their consultants.
9 Hodson noted his opinion that he is comfortable with the figures and plan presented. He has
10 spoken with the Parks Commission Chair, and having coached soccer for many years,he noted
11 that Ted Severson(who spoke earlier)had brought up some significant points for consideration.
12 Thuesen would like to see the project--as approved by the Council --go forward as soon as pos-
13 sible, and as far as funding, he will be anxious to hear from the City's consultants about the im-
14 pact the funding will have on the City.
Cavanaugh felt that the issue needed to be brought to the public's attention as the dollar figure
g g P g
16 presented is quite high. However,the go-ahead needed to be made by the.end of the year so that
17 the two-year-time frame can begin. He noted'that this is a preliminary pass and he would like
18 for the community to know about the project..
19 X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
20 None.
21 XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
22 There will be a regional meeting held at the Sheraton on September 28, 2000 and he invited the
23 Councilmembers to attend.
24 On the last newsletter, a garbage hauler's survey was included. The results have been received
25 (over 200) and it was about 50-50 that the residents choose their own hauler, or the Village
26 chooses one hauler. The results will be placed.back in the newsletter.
27 There has been a request from residents to do an electronic payment of utility bills and a survey
28 will be performed on that issue.
29 Regarding a web page, the City will retain a consultant on atrial basis to add the minutes and
other issues on the web page in October. "
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
• Page 11
1 Hodson suggested in the joint meeting'with the School Board, that it be brought up that high
2 school students work with the City on an interim program. Mornson noted that the School has
3 been asked before, and they have been continually looking for individuals.
4 Mornson wished to thank the Staff for the off-sale profits at the liquor stores. Additionally, he
5 would like to commend the Police, Public Works, and Fire Departments for handling the recent
6 flooding issue that happened.
7 Additionally, the construction of 33rd Avenue is nearly completed. 29th Avenue probably will
8 be completed around Thanksgiving. The Silver Lake Bridge program is anticipated to be com-
9 pleted around Thanksgiving as well.
10 Mornson further reported that the City's Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom has resigned.his
11 position and will be leaving on September 30 and will continue as a consultant beyond that point ,
12 if necessary:
13 Mornson reported that John Shardlow asked for a meeting with Staff regarding the Planning
14 Grant. In that Grant, it was mentioned that Hillcrest was being renovated and Mr. Shardlow was
concerned that the City would lose some funding ability. Mornson gave Shardlow the authority .
1 to change the application in order to have an accurate application.
17 Mornson and the Mayor had a meeting with the Hennepin,Parks Board. This Board is very inter
18 ested in purchasing the Salvation Army property. The Parks Board would like for the City to
19 forward,a letter stating that the City understands that the Parks Board is interested in the prop-
, 20 erty.
21 Thuesen commented during his report that he would like to look into putting restrictions on the
22 hauler's so that possibly smaller trucks, etc. are used. Mornson responded, but also stated this
23 would be an issue for further discussion at another time.
24 Horst inquired about what is happening at Amoco, because it appears that the site is being va-
25 cated. Mornson said there has been a proposal to,combine the Amoco site with a new lot, and
26 the latest plans have not yet been disclosed.
27 Horst had a meeting with some of the residents of the community that are firefighters. He stated
28 that those residents felt that the budget had been cut too much and Horst presented situations
29 wherein a more generous budget would be beneficial for the community.
30 Horst inquired if Hodson or Cavanaugh would be interested in reviewing the Apache Plaza issue
again, and both gentlemen stated they would not.
12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
September 12,2000
• Page 12
1 Hodson met with the North Suburban Communications Commission and felt it was an excellent
2 experience. He relayed some of the details of that meeting to the Council.
3 Cavanaugh noted that St. Anthony Boulevard by the golf course had flooded during the heavy
4 storm recently.
5 Cavanaugh stated that the City was close to opening a skateboard park, and it is already a tre-
6 mendous success.
7 Cavanaugh met with the firefighters, together with Councilmember Hodson. He felt it was a
8 productive meeting and thinks that progress was made.
9 XH. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
10 None. „
11 XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
12 Motion by Horst to adjourn the meeting at 10:55 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
PRespectfully submitted,
15 Sue Selseth
16 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
17
18 Mayor
19 ATTEST:
20 City Clerk
•
13
Saint Anthony Village
g
DATE: September 26, 2000 Approval:�`�""�
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: . Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
Heating Contractors License:
E. L. K. Mechanical HVAC Inc., Ramsey, MN
Master Mobile Home Service, Blaine, MN
Cigarette License:
Bilal, Inc. 3904 Silver Lake Road
Motor Vehicle Starting License:
Twin Cities Transport & Recovery, 3201 Stinson Boulevard
A
•
14
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: August 26, 2000 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: .Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:.
Temporary 3.2 Beer and Wine Permit:
Church of St. Charles Borromeo/Mardi Gras Celebration/ February 25, 2000
•
A
•
15
C FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST._ ANTHONY_VILLAG[
WP-0/2000 14: Check Register GL540R-VO6.27 PAGE
3I BANK VENDOR CHECK#-_____DATE__-_____-_______.___.AMOUNT
,
FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING
008319 ACKERMAN/DOROTHY 12753. 09/27/00 . 97.50
008450 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, 12754 09/27/00 323.68
,I 008292 ARNDT/ANNE - __ 12755 09/27/00 105,62
008660 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL 12756 09/27/00 198.34
008153 BOB 'S PERSONAL COFFEE SE 12757 09/27/00 84.47
21 008689 BODURTHA/SUSAN --__ 12758 09/27/00105.62___._-
i3 007147 BRAD RAGAN INC 12759 09/27/00 1 ,209.50
008293 BRIDGEMAN/PATRICIA 12760 09/27/00 156.00
008264 BRW, INC . _ __- 12761 09/27/00 13_,500_.00_-__.
6 .00001 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC . 12762 09/27/00 67.49
1�% 008500 CHEROKEE POWER EQUIP. 12763 09/27/00 87.86
'81 008693 CITY OF NEW HOPE _127_64_09/27/00 348.00
�e 008295 CLEMENS/KATHLYN 12765 09/27/00 128.37
'cI 007334 CONNELLY INDUST. ELECTRO 12766 09/27/00 199.43
007382 CROWN FENCE & WIRE C_O_M_P_A _ 12767 09/27/00 84
_3,9 .00_-__ .__-._
000785 DALCO 12768 09/27/00 29.21
'3 000800 DAVIES WATER EQUIP CO. 12769 09/27/00 2,043.70
.00005 DELL MARKETING L. P. ___ _ 12770 09/27/00 80.83--
as 000807 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 12771 09/27/00 589.30
za • 008417 DNR WATERS . 12772 09/27/00 2.60
27 ( 000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY __ _ 1277_3_0_9/27/00 -_ 7,366..00._
28 008691 DOW/MARJORIE 12774 09/27/00 104.00
005048 DPC. INDUSTRIES INC 12775 09/27/00 6.00
:0 007394 _ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC C . _ 1_2776_ 09/27/00
.00002 FASTSIGNS - 12777 09/27/00 314.49
008221 FOSTER,WENTZELL,HEDBACK, 12778 09/27/00 3,000.00
008647 FRATTALLONF_ 'S HARDWARE 12779 09/27/00 61 .76
001030 G & K SERVICES 12780 09/27/00 519. 18
001145 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 12781 09/27/00 9.59
008388 GOETSCH ASSOCIATES,_ _INC_. _ 12782 09/27/_00 _816_._28_
37 008584 GOODEN/LINDA 12783 09/27/00 107.25
33 001230 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 12784 09/27/00 118.40
391 008297 GORSHE/ELAINE 12785 09/27_/00 107._25
e(,Il 001420 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 12786 09/27/00 418.94
008376 HENNF_PIN CNTY SHERIFF'S 12787 09/27/00 239.08
az 008549 HENNEPIN CNTY SHERI_FF 'S _ _- 12788 09/27/00
43 007066 HF_NNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE 12789 09/27/00 60.00
as 008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 12790 09/27/00 51 .27
- 008444 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, IN. _ 12791 _09/27/0_0 149.28 -_
;a 008299 INHOFER/MARY LOUISE 12792 09/27/00 126.00
4; .00001 J.P. COOKF_ CO. 12793 09/27/00 44.47
=s 008301 KL_UCAS/NANCY _ _ 12794_0_9/27/0_0 10_5.62_ _
1 a9 000742 KROEPLIN/CONNIE _ 12795 09/27/00 73.73
®a 008680 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & 12796 09/27/00 11000.00
s, 002040 _ LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP_AOE _ 12797 09/27700 109.20
sz 008255 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC 12798 09/27/00 25.50
s3 �` 008302 MADDEN/MARJORIE 12799 09/27/00 126.00
sa 002125 MALENICK/JOHN 12800 09/27/00 20.58
I;a'
16
C FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAG-
++ 20/2000 14: Ch,ecE Register GL540R-VO6.27 PAGE
3 BANK VENDOR � _ __ CHECK# _ DATE AMOUNT
FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING
TJ 007348 MC COLLISTER . & COMPANY 12801 09/27/00 666.42
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC. 12802 09/27/00 2,081 .72
008509 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO-CONTROL 12803_09/27/00 319.97
+0 008467 MIDWAY FORD 1.2804 09/27/00 285.70
1 005010 MINN CONWAY FIRE & SAFET 12805 09/27/00 28.45
iz; 008269 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC _ 12806 09/27/00 __-_..-54_95_ -
_�007054 , MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN 12807 09/27/00 8.66
008045 MN COUNTY ATTYS ASSN 12808 09/27/00 682.77
+.3 008326 NEWMAN TRAFFI_C SIGNS 12809 09/27/00 _ 122-._80-_______
16 .00002 NFPA 1.2810 09/27/00 95.95
+7 002680 NORTHERN STATES POWER 12811 09/27/00 16,056.80
+a 000045 OFFICE DEPOT 12812 09/27/00 __1
19 008086 OFFICEMAX 12813 09/27/00 21.39 .
005168 OHL/JOHN 12814 09/27/00 2.75
z+i 008528 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES 12815. 09/2.7/00 285.00
2 008631 PARTS PLUS ROSEVILLE 12816 09/27/00 1 .22
23 008688 PAUL/JAMES 12817 09/27/00 110.50
z 008594 PETERPI_LT NORTH -_ 1.2_818. 09/27/00 25.80 ___,
,-!jl 008590 PETERSON/CHARLENE 12819 09/227/00 105.62
26 • 008274 _ PITNEY BOWES 1.2820 09/27/00. 148..46 -
z% i 004372 PLUNKET_T 'S _ 12821 .09/27/00 848.59__-
j=3 004492 OWEST 12822 09/27/00 227.65
008372 OWEST INTERACT SERVICES 12823 09/27/00 49.95
.00006 RECYCLE AMERICA 12824 09/.27/00 _______-22.,.50 ___.-_
002380 RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC 12825 09/27/00 1 ,799.94.
I'z 008282 RESOFT, INC . 1.2826 09/27/00 3,763.75
�! 003065 ROAD RESCUE_ INC _ 12_82_7_09/27/00_-___-..__.__ 51 ..18____.__
Lam_ 005293 ROAD RUNNER 12828 09/27/00 15.45
i36 008690 ROCKWOOD/MARY 12829 09/27/00 107.25
35 005270 ROSEVILLE RADIO ._ - __.. 1.2830.09/27/00 - 17.-57_-_____
37 008305 SCHWAAB/MARY 12831 09/27%00 97.50
003350 SEH-RCM 12832 09/27/00 11 , 446.20
004420 SIGNAL_ SYSTEMS INC _ 1.2833_ 09/27/00 20_.33
,a 003355 SILVER LAKE CLINIC 1.2834 09/27/00 154.00
4+ 008483 SKB 12835 09/27/00 225.00
42 005285 SR_OGA '_S _ -_ 1_28_36 09/27/0_0 _ 1-44._07 _-_-_
43 005297 ST CROIX RECREATION CO 12837 09/27/00 496.29
s; .00003 ST. MARIE SHEET METAL 12838 09/27/00 55.00
45 0086_94 STANDARD SPRING 12839 09/27/00.___
ac 003490 STREICHER 'S 12640 09/27/00 297.09
003260 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 12841 09/27/00 114.43
ae 0_08656 TACTICS LAW ENFORCEMENT 128_4_209/27/00 6_41_11____,.
ae 008306 TAYLOR/VALERIE 12843 09/27/00 117.00
=� 008684 TENSON CONSTRUCTION, INC 12844 09/27/00 266,011 .52
s, dft 0_0_7_33_7 T_IMES_AVE_R OFF SITE SECAE 12845 09/27/00 586.50 _
sz 003560 TRACY PRINTING 12846 09/27/00 72.00
531 .00004 TRUERIDE, INC . 12847 09/27/00 30,038.04
=+ 008355 TWIN CITY AREA LABOR 12848 09/27/00 165.00
H
17
Ei C FINANCI_A_L SYSTEM _S_T_.—ANTKON_Y-VILLA(
20/2000 14: Check:: Register GL540R—VO6.27 PAGE
3! FLANK VENDOR — CHECK#_DATE.— __—_AMOUNT._
FIRS FIRSTAR ST. ANTHONY CHECKING
7 004481 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 12849 09/27%00 42.39
=1 003630 TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICES 12850 09/21/00 289.84
008010 UNIFORMS--UNLIMI TED 12851—OQ/27.1QQ 106-J_0
J0I 008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 12852 09/27/00 696.55
�
I?j 003700 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 12853 09/27/00 80. 18
zl
FIRSTAR .ST. ANTHONY CHECKING 379,927.58 *�
161
1
191 _ - -- ----_--. .
COI
X11
X31
-i
--I
]S'
?JI
341
3J1
3
371 --- ----- -- -
38i -- --- ------ - ------ -- --
4C
42
43i
4G
=0
051
55
56
l
BRC FINANCIAL. SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLA
9/18/2000 16: Check Register GL5404-V06.27 PAGE
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
C)08311 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRI 17251 09/27/00 123.70
004225 ALLIANT FOODSERVICE 17252 09/27/00 985.42
004014 ALLIED PAPER CO. 17253 09/27/00 36.61
17254 09/27/00 154.21
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 17255 09/27/00 1 ,224 .25
-004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. C_ 0. , 17256 09/27/00 31931 .73
004086 CITY._OF ST. ANTHONY 17257 09/27/00 33,950:00
004087 CITY PAGES 17258 09/27/00 234.00
004095 COCA COLA BOTTLING 17259 09/27/00 2,525.76
Q08557 DAILEY DATA ASSOCIATES 17260 09/27/00 1 ,816:90
004120 EAGLE WINE CO 17261 09/27/00 526.37
004130 ECOLAB _ 17262 09/27/00 149.05
-- - - 004135 ---ELECTRO WFTCHMAN INC - -- 17263 09/27/00 159.75
008563 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASS 17264 09/27/00 85.00
004142 FOCUS NEWS _ 1726509/27/00 - 1 , 1,12.40
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC e. 17266 09/27/00 4,336.58
001180 GOODIN COMPANY 17267 09/27/00 87.47
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC . 172.68 09/27/00 398.00
004175 GRIGGS COOPER . CO INC 17269 09/27/00 15,020. 17
• 004201 HEGGIES PIZZA. 17270 09/27/00 84.30
008617 HINNENKAMP/WAYNE 17271 09/27/00 63.50
004.20.7 HOHENSTEIN 'S. LNC... .. - - - .. .. -.__._.1.727._.... . -- -- ------ - - .__ 50 ------ -
- 2 09/27/00 4,376.50
004220 JOHNSON BROS. LIQ. 17273 09/27/00 17,054.77
004.218 JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY C 17274 09/27/00 ti-04.73
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 17275 09/27/00 60,016.33
008680 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & 17276 09/27/00 312.50
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 17277 09/27/00 200.00
004265- MARK VII SALES IhIC 17278 09/27/00 24,828.41
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC . 17279 09/27/00 457 .'27
008671 MENGELKOCH CO. 17280 09/27/00 24.00.
-CO
------004272 METZ BAKING -- _.__-_._..... .. _. 17281 09/27/00 139.23
004334 NORTHEASTER 17282 09/27/00 510..30
002680 NORTHERN STATES POWER _ 17283 09/27/00 5,053.5-1•
004339 nlThl COMMUNICATIONS IhIC 1.7284 09/27/00 679.00
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 17285 09/27/00 62.6-,
004346 •OMEGA. PUBLISHING 17286 09/27/00 250.00
- --- - -004354 - PAUSTIS $ SONS - ---- 17287 09/27/00 1 ,961 .92
004355 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 17288 09/27/00 57.95
004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 17289 09/27/00 8,445.56
0(84376 PRIOR WINE CO 17290 09/27/00 2,.321.55
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 17291 09/27/00 10, 119.82
00.8597 R.D. HANSON ASSOC. , INC. 17292 09/27/00 128.00
002380 --RELIANT- ENERGY MINNE•GASC 17293 09/27/00. 308.76
004393 RON 'S ICE 17294 09/27/00 1 ,778.4.4•
.00002 SUPERIOR KNIFE, INC 17295 09/27/00 225.00
404466 SYSCO-MINt`IE$OTA 17296 09/27/00 1 ,840.4.5
004475 TRI TECH DISPENSING 17297 09/27/00 80.07
0044.80 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE 17298 09/27/00 113.86
19
_ BRC FINANCIAL_SYSTEM ----,------. _ ST. ANTHONY VILLA
/18/2000 16: Check Register GL540R—V06.27 PAGE
HANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008219 - US WEST DEX 17,299 09/27/00 843.88
004490 VAL-PAK OF MINNESOTA 17300 09/27/00 1 ,500.00
008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 17301 09/27/O0 523.32
004499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC . 17302 09/27/00 1 ,849.00
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 213,471 .97
1p
•
X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
A. Planning Commission - September 19, 2000
1. Village North LLP &Apache Animal Medicine; subdivision/final
plat approval.
B. Review Planning Proposal for Apache Plaza with John Shradlow Firm
and Jim Prosser from Ehlers Firm.
C. Hennepin Parks Letter with Doug Bryant of Hennepin
County Parks.
D. Discuss funding plan for Central Park redevelopment.
• E. Report from Todd Hubmer WSB.
1.Resolution accepting feasibility report and ordering plans and
specifications for 2001 Street Project.
2. General engineering updates.
A
SEP. -21' 00 (THU) 16: 17x TEL:612 421 9511
2®
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY D Lf ) 4'v
•2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
3 SEPTEMBER 19, 2000
4 7:00 p.m.
5 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
6 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Vice
7 Chair Melsha.
8 ROLL CALL.
9 Present: Vice Chair Melsha; Commissioners Tillmann, Hanson, Thomas,
10 Latch, and Stille.
11 Commissioners absent: Chair Bergstrom, Commissioner Thomas
12 Also present: Spencer Isom,Assistant City Manager
13 CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
14 ITEMS: _
15 None.
16 I. PUBLIC INPUT.
17 Vice Chair McLsba invited any person from the audience to speak to the Commission regarding items
18 that are not on the usual agenda.
19 II. APPROVAL
OF THE PLANNING CON[NUSSION MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST
20 15,2000.
21 Motion by Hatch,second by Hanson,to approve the August 15,2000 Planning Commission Meeting
22 Minutes with the following mod'i'fication:
23 Page 5,Line 9, delete"City Attomey Soth" and replace it with"Chair Bergstrom"
24 Page 5,Line 24, change "prevent" to "present"
25 Page 7, Line 1, delete"Stille voted aye."
26 Motion carried ana]iima1i91Y.
27 III. COMMUNICATION FROM CITY COUNCIL.
28 None.
29
30 IV. REQUESTS FOR POSTPONEMENTS OR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATIONS.
31 None.
32 V. NEW APPLICATIONS/PURLIC BEARINGS.
33 A. Public Hearing Application For Subdivision/Fina Plat Approval --Village North_LLP
34 and A- ache Animal Medicine Seek to Reglat Their Properties Into Three .hots.
5 Vice Chair Melsha opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. and requested a report from Staff.
�6
SEP. -21' 00 (THU) 16: 17 TEL:612 421 9511
21
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
September 19, 2000
• Page 2
1 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reported that the owner of Apache Animal Clinic has ap-
2 plied to replat the properties into three lots in order to expand the size-of the Iot on which the
3 animal clinic is located, decrease the size of the lot on which the Industrial Custom Products.
4 building is located, and create a new lot to the east of the industrial building. The property
5 would be replatted as Lots 1,2 and 3,Block 1,Apache Terrace,2nd Addition, Ramsey County,
6 Minnesota.
7 Isom directed the Commission's attention to a letter dated September 19, 2000 from City Attor-
e ney Soth. Isom noted that the Commission can consider this application as long as it is in
9 compliance with the nine items noted in City Attorney Sothis letter of September 19, 2000.
10 Isom noted that the Staff and City Attorney had noted that they could proceed with the prelimi-
11 nary plat, as long as the properties in question were completed. However,the Planning Commis-
12 sion can approval the final plat with the understanding that the conditions would be met. The
13 City Council would hear this issue after the nine conditions have been met.
14 After calling for public input regarding this matter and hearing none, Vice Chair Melsha closed
15 the public hearing at 7:16 p.m,
0 6 Motion by Stille, second by Tillmann,to approve the Apache Terrace 2nd addition application .
7 subject to the nine items that are outlined in City Attorney Soth's letter of September 19, 2000 to
18 Ken Solie and Raymond Ogren from Dorsey & Whitney .
19 Isom noted that this issue would be tentatively set for the September 26, 2000 City Council
20 meeting, as long as the conditions are met as noted above and the City Attorney is satisfied.
21 Furthermore, Isom noted that all items regarding the application should be sent to the City Attor-
22 ney, with a copy to the City Staff.
23 VI. POSTPONED APPLICATIONS.
24 None.
25 VII. REPORTS, PRESENTATIONS,AND/OR CONCEPT REVIEWS.
26 None.
27 VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS.
28 1. F.stabli h Subcommittee To Finalize the Draft Antennae Ordinance In R=aration for_Eu-
29 tare Commission and Council Consideration.
30 Assistant City Attorney Isom noted that to draft and incorporate a change into the City Code can
31 be a complicated process. It is therefore his hope and anticipation that the Planning Commission
32 would proceed through the necessary research via a subcommittee, and then follow through with
03 a draft proposal to present to the members of the Planning Commission, A subcommittee could
4 facilitate the process.
SEP. -2l' OO (THU) 16: 18 TEL:612 421 9511 22
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
September 19, 2000
• Page 3
1 Isom then reviewed for the Commission that at a prior Planning Commission meeting,he had re-
2 ceived direction that the Commission was in favor of adopting a similar ordinance as that of
3. Dublin's. In this,respect,he would request that the Planning Commission adopt a subcommittee
4 or task force that would go forth with the facilitating of what would be ultimately presented to
5 the City Council.
6 Hanson asked what timeframe would be required. Isom noted that it would up to the Planning
7 Commission about the timeframe to get a proposed draft in workable form.
8 Hatch, Stille and Melsha volunteered to be on the task force for the antennae ordinance.
9 Motion by Hanson, second by Melsha,that the Planning Commission develop a subcommittee to
10 look at the antenna ordinance and the Commissioners that volunteered are Hatch, Stille and
11 Melsha.
12 Motion carried unanimously.
13 2. Provide a ricil of er to Pass an interim ordinance ato-
14 rium) lWardinl;Future Requests f r Permits.under Section 1160 (Antennas and Towers).
�5 Assistant City Manager Isom reviewed for the Commission the background,relating to this issue
6 from prior meetings.
17 Discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners regarding the typical length of time for a morato-
18 rium. Assistant City Manager Isom noted that the typical moratorium is approximately one
19 year;however,the Planning Commission must arrive at a timeframe that would allow sufficient
20 time to review, draft, and/or change ordinances.
21 Motion by Melsha, second by Hatch,that the Planning Commission recommends to the City
22 Council that a one-year moratorium be developed on antennas and towers in St.Anthony in order
23 to facilitate and research the drafting of possible ordinances.
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25 3. T ivable Cities D moT stration Account Proposal Letter, dated August 25, 2000
26 Assistant City Attorney Isom noted that the grant was approved for the first round and a subse-
27 quent application has been received for Phase II. Additionally,the Mayor, Chair of the Planning
28 Commission, Staff and DSU(City's Consultants)have met to discuss the completion and
29 submittal of that application. Furthermore, it is assumed and anticipated that the application will
30 be submitted on time and the process moved forward.
31 In response to a question by Tillmann about Apache Plaza Isom noted that the Apache Plaza was
�2 originally included in the application,but the application has been amended.
SEP. -21' 00 (THU) 16: 18 TEL:612 421 9511 i
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
September 19, 2000
• Page 4
1 IX. COMMISSION INPIUT.
2 1. Chair to Select a Commissioner as the Representative to the Upcoming Council
3 Meetin ..
4 Commissioner Tillmann volunteered to attend the City Council meeting on Tuesday,
5 September 26, 2000.
6 2. Commissioners' Comments.
7 Hanson noted that he had heard through the Kiwanis organization about some future
8 plans about the Autumn Woods development. He would hope that the Planning
9 Commission would be made aware of those types of plans from Staff
10 Hanson additionally noted that the Planning Commission had spent tremendous hours
11 researching the Apache Plaza project, only to have it rejected by the City Council. He
12 has heard that there might be a retailer interested in the Apache Plaza, and he requested
13 some clarification from Staff. -
14 Assistant City Manager Isom noted that he could speak in general terms about that
15 inquiry. However, he noted that the City is trying to balance some areas and that
16 development issues are generally handled through the City Manager's office.
7 Additionally, he noted that unless the owners of Apache Plaza are willing and ready to
g sell, it is not an issue that can be discussed in any detail.
19 Tillman inquired of Staff if the potential buyer is a retailer that would fall under the
20 existing Code,then the Planning Commission would not become involved. Staff
21 confirmed that zoning codes are in force that have been passed, and if a commercial
22 retailer meets all of the requirements,there is currently nothing in place at this time that
23 would prevent said retailer from moving forward.
24 Hanson inquired about the City's responsibility to keep the residents informed of any
25 current or potential developments at Apache Plaza.
26 Assistant City Manager Isom noted that is an area that the City is intending to study; i.e.,
27 what tools are available to the City to prevent or discourage development. From a .
28 planning prospective,Isom noted that currently there is not anything to report.
29 Melsha expressed his personal opinion that the City lost a good project with Apache, and
30 he felt that those Councilmembers opposed to the project perceived deficiencies in the
31 proposal. There was a significant effort,he stated, on behalf of Hillcrest and the Planning
32 Commission to satisfy those concerns. Additionally,he noted that it was frustrating
33 because it appeared that the project would not be approved by those Councilmembers
34 despite the steps made by Hillcrest to satisfy their concerns.
•35 Hatch expressed happiness that the Council approved the Planning Commission's
36 recommendation for the lighting style. Hatch questioned the Livable Communities Grant
37 and the Council's comment to take an active role in that area. hatch_asked Staff if the
SEP• -21' 00 (THU) 16: 19 TEL:612 421 9511 { J 24
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
September 19,2000
• Page 5
1 Livable Communities grant was the Council's vision of pursuing an active plan, or were
2 they waiting to see what happens and then pursue options,
3 Assistant City Manager Isom noted that the Livable Communities grant will be a catalyst
4 for looking at long-term uses and also identifying what would be the highest and best use
5 for that area. Isom further noted that he understands that, from Staff s prospective, all
6 things possible will be done to ensure that the planning or examination takes place of the
7 targeted area.
8 Furthermore,he stated that the Council had set aside the$150,000 match for this grant
9 and.there are some things that will happen regardless of whether the City gets the grant or
10 not. Those funds are earmarked for that area and he understands that the City will move
11 forward and probably spending some of those funds prior to receiving the grant award.
12 Additionally,he received an E-mail recently that alluded to the fact that the Met Council
13 is no longer requiring a match for the award, so a number of things could happen in the
14 next few weeks that could change the texture of the research.
15 Stille felt that the City intended to spend a significant amount of time and effort to
16 determine what.the highest and best use of that site will be. Obviously,he stated,that
7 could be,a number of things, and he questioned whether it would be beneficial to consider
8 a moratorium on the Apache site so that some plans could be worked out in the event the
19 grant is not received. He inquired of Staff if that issue had been discussed within the
20 City.
21 Isom noted that he had not heard any discussions regarding a moratorium on the Apache
22 site. Additionally,he noted that there would be a number of legal issues that would
23 dictate how a moratorium would be handled. If the Commission would like to direct
24 Staff to examine that issue, that this would be the time to bring it up.
25 Melsha reviewed some of the issues for the Salvation Army property and how it would
26 relate to the Apache Plaza property. Stille said his goal is that there would be a lot of
27 planning, and if the funds are not received,the planning was all for naught.
28 Isom noted that he would take this as a direction and do some research on the possibility
29 of a moratorium for that area. and he would return to the Commission at a later date with
30 a report.
31 Isom reported that September 29,2000 would be his last day as Assistant City Manager.
32 He will be returning full-time to school to fulfill his Ph.D.requirements and he would
33 continue with the City in some aspects with the Planning Commission until a replacement
34 is found.
035 X. ADJOURNMENT.
36 Motion by Melsha, second by Stille,to adjourn at 7:50 p.m.
SEP. -21' 00 (THU) 16: 19 TEL:612 421 9511
25
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
September 19, 2000
Page 6
1 Motion carried unanimous? -
2 Respectfully submitted,
3 Sue Selseth
4 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
26
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 9/13/00 MEETING DATE: 9/19/00
TO: Planning Commission
THROUGH: Public Works Director Hartman
FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom
RE: Public Hearing. Joint Application for Subdivision/Plat Approval for 2801 and
2501 37"' Avenue, Village North and Apache Animal Medicine. Final Plat.
Village North LLP,in which Ken Solie is a partner;as owner of the Industrial Custom Products building at 2801
37'b Avenue NE,and Apache Animal Medicine,P.A., as owner of the Apache Animal Clinic,have applied to
replat their properties into three lots in order to expand the size of the lot on which the animal clinic is located,
decrease the size of the lot on which the Industrial Custom Products building is located,and create a new lot to
the east of the industrial building. The property would be replatted as Lots 1,2,and 3,Block 1,Apache Terrace
2"d Addition,Ramsey County,Minnesota.
The above action requires submittal of a preliminary and final plat in accordance with Section 1500.03 and
1500.04 of the St. Anthony code of ordinances. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved (with
comments)the preliminary plat at their meeting in August. The preliminary plat(with comments)were reviewed
and approved by the City Council at their meeting on August 22,2000. The final plat has been submitted and
• reviewed by staff,to include Public Works Director Hartman. Staff finds that the comments of the Planning
Commission have been incorporated and further finds the applicant's submittal to be acceptable.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Subdivision and Final Plat.
Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin
FM PURPOS'fS�11-6 PLAT.TIE SOUM LICE W B.00L 1.
or� �D AmfT1011 e AS9Tf4D 10 IUD A APACHE TERRACE 2ND ADDITION - "a"'TM�� -
W M=At)M SHOW 111U.E WO LIWIXTFD BY A 1 MICt .
BY 14"ROI PPE MAMM BY LICENSE 141=157t AND
Wr AOCOfOMfO 70 W 440WA 1111'AWIM AND LMfCH IIHALL �R 1 .
- E M PLACE wTIIN am YEAR cur 11E REOORDMO E 116 PLAT . -
0 DENOTES MIND RAMMY OOUNIN GSM RON Mo UIM917 SILVER �rA`K1C �'_'�_' -
• Doc1ES 1/!MOI YOAAOfr POLIO MD YAIaQ.D BY - I -. .. - '!; 1's'`` I �i.'1•
LICENSE Ind i1Q77.Yi64 011MRYg MpCdIT -
p"n TIC n - J_
R ^� n E LW of w 1/4 BEa m _ d
_ 1
C R .435.64 --
QLL'^Tl/1s'1 1 1 I1 L- .. 96L `\ n v(' I (•.
1'R-
3904. q`
I
,,,-6*23*3
o CJ �TE ----J S IL uc OF w /4 sm 31 E �� w _ NoKIN E 00Vunurr�EA PENT I � I w y„N .y0ac Nc
" N.��g 48' i 67.29 N � � 01279 UTILITY EASEMENT I I UTLITY
DRAINAGEk DOC.Nib.1457832-� EASEMENT -� W Y I C SECTON ]t, TOWNSHIP 30,RANGE 21.
s rsy� URUTYEASEMENT �`: I ^ I .LOi J
riff 1�. 2 . un rY EASEMENT i f 3 I a+" •• K .DOC.No.155382a I `` L C1 i 5 2 � O ■ \
A p A n 1 C S>�TM`\ T.s,6Sj9,53L�0' . A P A nl C �I A-Y A n A nMI_rI^k I 1 V ri L 2 A yy O LOT 1 err n�.rjl_ Lnan ;I I JRv
nvvl I Ivt 1 '� s I
"6 s 1o3as -
--- EAST 195504
_ 3/ I i _ n Y�.V1_ _ L..RTF�f,�1 _BID 1s, T so - - !rte 'I! w 60 w
Con 1 IA I� f- A nnl Tl/�A I "nl •ov •►Ifs v1A IN� (] �n•o1\cL I To•/�TC� /�•o ELI• A o�(� �o /mot Ik IC 1 •f�nlTln ' 1t�y�(aJ �n•on�A l• ACRES
J L/V L.II1L I �2 I nLAVI l 1%_1I 11 I%A-nLV� ecru f�lt.v$I S I kanL�Ij .1 I nnV 1 J I vin uTnl �� I nvL�w I �_ I I f�VVl�I w3K1 nuvl l lvly I 8 I L7nnvu.n
nvnt_J
SW OWL SQ M.11P.J4 RAE.21 <�a e0.LIE OF w 1/4 em.1L.71P.'A ROE 23 rn � o�'/filch D RAMSEY s'�OQ iT 306 W_IL
FOUND W&MY DOWN 1q .M.,
O 100 200
KNOW ALL MEN BY TMESE.PRESENTS: That Village North,a Minnesota general partnnsnip.e`mw and proprietor and rotor Bank of Minnesota.National Asaocbtbn mortgagee of the faft ng
described property situated in the City of St Anthony.County of Ramsey.State of Mnne.olo:
SCALE IN FEET
Let 1,Black".Apache Treace.
Lot 2.Black I.Apache Plaza 3rd Addition.Ramsey County.Minnesota SCALE. 1' 100'
And that Apache Animal Medics.a Minnesota Corporation oener and proprietor of the following described land situated in the County of Ramsay.State of Minnewtu,to-it:
Lot 1,Sit&1,Apache Plaza 3rd Addirllar,Ramsay County.Minnesota.
use
That pat of the SOO LINE Railroad right of.ay adjoining the plat of APACHE PLAZA 3RD ADDITION.Ramsey County.Minnesota•describad as follo.c _ - - '
- I.hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described'on this Plot as APACHE TERRACE 2ND ADDITION; that this plat is a correct representation
of Me survey, that od distoncn we
• - Commenonq it Me Southeast comer of Lot 1.Block 1 sold APACHE PLAZA,MO ADDITION; Menu North 90 degrees 00 mnules 00 seconds Weston osaumed Daorknq along the South
_.Uy Moen on Me plat.fiat and hundredths Of'0 foot that an monuments have been correctly Placed in the ground es move(or.is be correctly placed in the ground as designate&.)that Me
..
- line at sold Lot 1,Block 1,APACHE PLAZA 3RD ADDITION.464.56 feel_to Me.esterly most comer of said Lot i,Block 1 APACHE PLAZA 3RD ADDITION said weiterly comer be;nq Me point
of Outside boundary Ii..we.-Ily designated on the plat and that there pre no wet fordo as wfned'n Minnesota Statute.,Section 505.02.Subd.1,or public highways to designoted.other than
as
beginning of Me land to be described; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 00 sewnds East 68.37 feet; Nonce along a Curve concave to M.'sduth,463.55 feel said curve having a rodi-of
sheen on this plat -
4369.53 feet,central angle e.degrees 02 minutes 28 seconds and a chord bearing North 81 degrees 36 mi nutes 46 s-ds East; thence North 84 degrees 38 minutes 00 mcads East
-
168.00 feet• I....South 0 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 67.29 test to the northerly line of mid APACHE PLAZA 3RD ADDITION; thence South 84 degrees 38 minutes DO seconds
West. 168.00 feet; tnence along a tangential uvrre concave to the south.470.01 feat mid curve having a radius of 4329.S3and a cent,.]angle Of 6 degrees 13 minutes 12 seconds
to the
point of beginning. Thomas E Hodarff.Lord Survey-
Minnesota License No.23577
Have caused Me same to be surveyed and platted as APACHE TERRACE 2ND ADDITION: and pro hereby aadicate to the public for public we forever the easements as shorn on this plot
for
drainage and utility purposes enly. STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
In..Leese•hereof said Village North.o Minnesota general partnership has caused Mew presents to be si"d by Its proper officer.this day of 2000. ._
Thor lorsgonq Surveyor's CMllkata•os ockno.lsdgetl before me this day of 2000 by Thomas E NedorH,Land Surveyor,Minnesota Liconsa Na 23677.
MLLAGE NORTH "
by - Notory,Publid,Hennepin County.Minnesota
My Commas;..Espres
It.
OTY COUNCIL OF ST.ANTHONY,MINNESOTA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
We do hereby certify toot an Ina day of 2000,ire City Council OI the City of$t. Anthony.Ynnewld,.aisprawd this plat.All monuments veal be set as specified
by Ire cry
The foregoing instrument.as a kno.ledged befaa me this day of 2000 by the of mid Village Norte on behalf Council and as slated On this plat ac.ordirg to Min nesota
Statutes•Seatlan 505.02.Subd.1.
of said Partnersny.
Notary,Public. County. a
Minnesota Sgned: May
My Commission Expres
In witness shereaf said irster Bank of Minnesota,Holland As ciotion has caused those presents to be signed by Its proper Officer,this day of 2000, Signed: City Clark
- - - -
FIRSTAR BANK
. DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION .. .
by
ia:es payable In the peer 2000 on the land herein described have been pd4 also tore we no dd'nguont rases and transfer entered this pray of 2000.
Its
. STATE OF MINNESOTA Sg..& Deputy
COUNTY OF -
- The foregoing instrument•w ocknoviedged before me this day of 2000 by the of said frislor Bank on Denali -of said asa000U_on .. .. -. RAMSEY
COUNTY SURVEYOR
Pursuant to M'fNa.oto Statutes,Section 393A42.this plat nos been 4-mined and approved this day of 2000.and the'conditions of YlnnNola Statutes.Section 505.03•
Nalary Publc County M'nnemlo Subdivision 2.'have been fullWea
my Commission Evros
In sit...whereaf sd;d Apache Mind Medici a,a Minemlo Corporation has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer,this day of 20DO. David D.Ca)"d.ILLS.
.. Ramsay County Surveyor. .
APACHE ANIMAL MEDICINE
RAMSEY COUNTY RECORDER
by
.:� I hereby certify that this plat of APACHE TERRACE 2ND ADD17ION was fled in the office of Me County Recadw for record on this day Of 2000.at
o'clock
Rs _Jn,and sus duly fled In Book - of Plots.Page as Documanl Number
STATE OF MINNESOTA _ County Recorder
COUNTY OF - Ramsay County Yfmssote
Me of said •Mrnd So JOHNSON
The forponq nslrurronl was oCYrnesAedgsd before me this day of 2000 by 4-
YedlCrne an Derhdf OI sold urPOrallon
My Ca milell County YMsmla
LAND SURVEYORS
f
My corrhmieseslan Egtss
28
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 8, 2000
TO: Mike Momson,`City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: CENTRAL PARK PROJECT/FUNDING
As directed by you, I have come up with a possible financial plan to pay for the $1.6
million dollar Central Park Project with zero increases in taxes and full utilization of
-budget reserves.
The proposed funding sources for Central Park are as follows:
1) $585,000 - General Obligation Bond (Abate Evergreen Townbdomes)
The debt associated with the Evergreen Soil Correction District has been defeased. The
District can now be decertified (expires is 2001) and established as a Tax Abatement
Parcel.
Revenues from the property are sufficient to fund the$585,000 General Obligation
Bond based on a minimum School abatement of$29,000 as shown by the Springsted
analysis. If the School abates more, which they can, the bond issue can be increased
and the City wouldn't have to use as much reserves.
2) $250,000 - General Fund Reserves
Previously, these reserves were set aside for budget contingencies for potential losses in
revenue in State Aid (LGA/HACA) and Liquor Profits.
3) $100,000 - Parks Grant (State Amateur Grant).
4) $665,000- Funding from the Water Filtration Fund..
As part of the Springsted Debt Study, an analysis was performed to identify available
water filtration funds without jeopardizing funding for operation and maintenance or
plant replacement costs. Funds totaling $1,000,000 were identified as useable.
It should be noted that the Water Filtration Funds have been invested in long-term
• investments with the intention of preserving capital while using the interest earnings to
pay for the operation and maintenance of the GAC Plant. To make these funds available
for the Central Park Project without losses in principal, liquidation of investments i
would occur over the next several months.
29
85 E.SEVENTH PLACE,SUITE 100
SAINT PAUL,MN 55101-2887
651-223-3000 FAX:651-223-3002 SPRINGSTED
• �� Public Finance Advisors
EXTERNAL- MEMORANDUM
TO: St. Anthony City and School District
FROM: Robert D. Thistle
DATE: September 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Central Park =
The City of St. Anthony and the School District are exploring alternatives to jointly finance
improvements to Central Park. The total cost of those improvements is estimated to be $1.6
million.
• There are basically five options currently under consideration:
1. Cash on Hand
2. Internal Loan/Low Interest
3. Tax Abatement
4. Referendum
5. Cash and Abatement
Option 1: Cash
The use of cash on hand may be used if the accumulation of funds is consistent
with policy needs of the'City and that the use of such funds does not jeopardize
other financial requirements, needs or obligations. The City does have under
consideration the use of approximately $665,000 from the Water Filtration Fund,
which funds are not vital to the'general operations, maintenance and replacement
costs of the plant. The choice is whether or not to spend those funds for this,
project or other projects. The City also is expecting to use $100,000 in grant funds
from the State.
Option 2: Internal Loan
The City could loan the funds to the project to be repaid over the same 15 year
term as the abatement bonds. However, any repayment would have to come from_
available funds of the City and School District and would not be construed to be a
special levy. Further, the interest rate on a $1 million loan would be approximately
• 3.0% assuming an annual revenue stream of$84,796. That stream at 0% interest
would support a loan of.$1.,270,000.
SAINT PAUL,MN • MINNEAPOLIS,MN • MILWAUKEE,WI • OVERLAND PARK,KS • WASHINGTON,DC • DES MOINES,IA
30
St. Anthony City and School District
September 11, 2000
Page 2
•
Option 3: Tax Abatement
Tax abatement is the use of taxes generated from specific tax parcels to pay for --
designated costs. The.taxes are collected in the. normal process, not returned to
the taxpayer..
The City has two Tax Increment Financing Districts which will close in 2000 and
2001. The increment generated from these districts is currently being collected by
the City to pay prior eligible costs of the TIF district. Neither the City nor the
School District has had access to this tax revenue for their general operations. It is
anticipated that those taxes would now be abated for the Central Park Project.
The Captured Value of the Walbon and Evergreen TIF Districts is $97,794. Based
on the current tax rates of only the City and School District, the taxes generated is
$84,796.
City Tax $29,689
School District Tax 55,107
$84,796
Based on the above, we have calculated the amount of debt amortized over 15
years which would be wholly supported by the abatement revenue generated.
• Maximum . Mid Range Minimum
Contribution 100% / 100%' 100% /75% 100% /54%
City $ 29,689 $ 29,689 $ 29,689
School District .55,107 41.300 29.689
Total Revenue $ 84,796 $ 71,019 $ 59,378
Bond Issue Available $870,000 $730,000 $610,000
Estimated Tax Impact
$150,000 House
City, $ ,11.44 $ 11.44 .$11.44
School District $ 17.62 $ 13.21 $. 9.49
$500,000 Commercial Property
City $ 89.51 $ 89.51 $89.51
School District $137.88 $105.41 $74.28
$250,000 Apts (4 or more units)
City $..34.64 $ 34.64 $34.64
School District $ 53.37 $ 40.03 $38.75
31
St. Anthony dity and School District
September 11, 2000
Page 3
• In order to establish an abatement district, a plan needs to be prepared and a public
hearing held. Both the City and School.District need to hold a hearing this meeting
could be a joint hearing at a joint meeting of the City Council and School Board.
Each entity would be required to pass a resolution approving the plan.
Option 4: Referendum
The City and School District could conduct a referendum whereby a majority of
votes cast on the question would be required to issue the debt.
Option 5: Cash and Abatement
As noted heretofore, the use of abatement only will not fully support a bond issue
which would generate $1.6 million in available funds for the project. The City could
either make an initial cash contribution from its water trust fund and/or other
available funds to make up the difference or it could pledge future allocations to
make up the difference between abatement revenue and required debt service.
Depending on the mix of abatement,-an initial contribution from available sources
would range from $730,000 to $990,000. Annual contributions would range from
$70,915 to $96,335 for the term of the financing. The City and School District may
elect to share in the contribution of this shortfall.
We would be pleased to continue to work with the City and School District in the preparation of
data needed for the public hearing and the implementation of the project.
•
2.
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
• HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 00-078
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT
AND ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted June 27,2000, a report was prepared by
WSB&Associates,Inc.with reference to the improvement of:
• Wilson Street from 29'Avenue NE to 30*Avenue NE
• West Armour Terrace from Roosevelt Street to Silver Lake Road
• 301 Avenue NE from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary,
cost-effective,and feasible.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of St.Anthony that:
1) The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report at an
estimated total cost of the improvement of$1,576,100.00.
2) WSB &Associates,Inc.is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. They shall
prepare,plans and,specifications for making such improvements.
Adopted this day of 22000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
F.%WP WM 0d5.51kd-00-07&Wpd
TOTAL P.02
3
MEMORANDUM
•
DATE: 9/26/00
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager Mornson
RE: Interim Ordinance (Mo atorium) on Permits for Antennas and Towers.
During their July and August meetings,the Planning Commission discussed passage of a moratorium on new
construction/erection of Antennas and Towers. On September 19,the Commission established a subcommittee
(Commissioners Melsha,Hatch and Stille)to study the existing ordinance and a proposed draft antenna ordinance
submitted by staff. The Commission also voted unanimously to recommend Council pass an interim ordinance
(moratorium),pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Section 462.355,Subd.4.,prohibiting the issuance/consideration
of new permits for antennas and/or towers for a period of one(1)year. Said interim ordinance will afford the
Commission an opportunity to adequately study/review the existing ordinance and replace/amend as deemed
necessary.
By copy of this communication,staff asks City Attorney Soth to draft an interim ordinance. Staff will present
said ordinance at the October 10,2000 meeting of City Council.
Cc: City Attorney Soth
• City Clerk Kroeplin
•
XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: August 2000
Expenditures: Mean Average
67%
08/31/2000 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Spent Budget
Mayor/Council $58,000.00 $47,264.39 $10,735.61 81% 19%
Intergovernmental Relations $17,450.00 $4,467.53 $12,982.47 26% 74%
Cable Franshise $20,500.00 $15,306.40 $5,193.60 75% 25%
General Management $114,400.00 $76,841.85 $37,558.15 67% 33%
Elections $22,800.00 $7,220.20 $15,579.80 32% 68%
Finance/Insurance $271,700.00 $121,308.17 $150,391.83 45% 55%
Finance/Assessing $37,000.00 $34,200.33 $2,799.67 92% 8%
Legal $59,800.00 $31,876.12 $27,923.88 53% 47%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $9,100.00 $5651.92 $8,534.08 1 6% 94%
City Buildings $98,900.00 $53,545.09 $45,354.91 54% 46%
Civil Defense $40,900.00 $26,492.03 $14,407.97 65% 35%
Police Protection $1,010,700.00 $645,990.64 $364,709.36 64% 36%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $474,300.00 $303,995.59 $170,304.41 64% 36%
Fire Protection $494,300.00 $323,665.01 $170,634.99 65% 35%
Inspections/Building Permits $66,300.00 $42,245.09 $24,054.91 64% 36%
Animal Control $5,700.00 $526.44 $5,173.56 9% 91%
Public Works $420,700.00 $235,840.47 $184,859.53 56%' 44%
Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $117,400.00 $42,658.24 $74,741.76 36%. 64%
Tree and Weed Care $30,700.00 $11,143.72 $19,556.28 36% 64%
Parks $81,800.00 $52,617.30 $29,182.70 64% 36%
r Transfers to other Funds $75.000.00 $37,500.00 $37.500.00 000 500
Total Expenditures $3,527,450.00 $2,115,270.53 $1,412,179.47 60% 40%
Stormwater Fund#702 0813112000
Projeted
Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $420,152.55
MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $941,394.33 ,
DNR $4,000,000.00 $1,834,032.97
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Stone Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $423,157.86
Storm Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1.594171.55
Total Project Budget $9,610,000.00 $6,063,009.26
Other Project Activity:
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75
Met Council $20,000.00 $5,000.00
Stormwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $29,457.95
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 $26.035.87
Total Revenues $9,911,000.00 $6,439,519.10
08/31/2000
Expenditures: Expenditures=to-Date
WSB-Engineering Services $353,203.81
Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $24,819.19
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025.00
Purchase of Flood Homes $939,166.64
Pahl Avenue Ponding $1,652.89
Flood Relief Grant Program $54,798.30
Private Homes-Dumpsters $1,774.15
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,017,789.71
2000 Street Improvement Project $267,929.89
Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1.441.981.41
Total Expenditures $4,108,096:98
t Project Balance $2,331,422:12
Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $2,514,600.82
EXPENDITURE REPORT 08/31/2000
WSB: Flood Relief Grant Program:
Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Expenditures
Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennis/Penny Gault $10,000.00
Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00
Storrnwater Task Force $29,243.00 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00
Storrnwater Engineering $29,806.76 Castle Building&Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 .-
Flood Problem Analysis $27,178.98 L.N.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00.
MCES Grant Application $1,475.25 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00
DNR/FEMA Grants $7,121.00 St.Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00
Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 RiteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00
Park Design $148,475.10 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80
Harding Street Design $39,024.29 Lamere Concrete-Flood Proofing Improvement 4412
1/1 Study $20,601.00 Twin Cities Glass Block-2521 W.Armour Tenrace $292.50
Flood Grant-1998/1999/2000 $22.472-00 Total Flood Relief Program $54,798.30
Total WSB $353,203.81
Private Homes-Dumpsters
Barr Engineering: Project Description:
Project Description: Waste Management $391.65
District#6 Watershed Study $2.709-35 Nancy Myhran $259.50
Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Linda Gonler $198.00
Susan Kozarek $925-00
Dorsey&Whitney: Total Dumpsters $1,774.15
Project Description:
Legal Services for Flooding Issues $18,071.16 Sump Pump
Legal Services-Comdenation of Homes $1,930.00 Project Description:
Legal Services-Harding Street $1,937.80 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2,880.23 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $115.64
Total Dorsey&Whitney $24,819.19 Total Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64
Water Quality Study:
Silver Lake: 1999 Street Improvement Project
Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Project Description:
WSB-Engineering Services $171,543.02
Purchase of Homes: Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85
Project Description: Northdale Construction $823,164.01
Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Treemendous $460.00
Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Moody's Investment Services $3,250.00
Demolition $9,156.00 Dorsey&Whitney $2,911.55
Taxes $839.61 Bond Issuance Expense $7.625.28.
Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 Total 1999 Street Project $1,017,789.71
Check for Asbestos-Abatement.Services $365.00
Seal&Cap Well $1,450.00 2000 Street Improvement Project
Purchase of 2713 St.Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Project Description:
Demolition $11,258.00 WSB-Engineering Services $158,747.44
Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc. $70,807.30
Recording Deed/Taxes $2,506.98 Buchen Environmental Services $2,248.99
Title Insurance $946.00 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93
Seal&Cap Well $1,420.00 Bond Issuance Expense $35,893.23 .
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 Total 2000 Street Project $267,929.89
1. Purchase of 2700/2704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $208,072.00 Silver Point Park/Construction
First American Title $375.00 Project Description:
Evergreen Land Services $9,389,41 Richard Knutson,Inc, $339,159.22
Total Purchase of Homes $939,166.64 Richard Knutson,Inc, $300,593.77
Richard Knutson,Inc, $130,084.79
Pahl Avenue Ponding: Richard Knutson,Inc, $305,667.27
Project Description: Richard Knutson,Inc, $56,486.88
Construction Bulliten $1,432.20 Richard Knutson,Inc, $50,176.49
Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $220.98 Richard Knutson,Inc, $140,028.70
Total Pahl Avenue Ponding $1,652.89 Richard Knutson,Inc, $109,601.19
Trillum Park $10-183.10 .
Total Payments to Contractors $1,441,981.41
August - 2000 City of St.Anthony
Profit&Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE 08/31/00 08/31/99 (Decrease)
Sales $172,892.00 $171,001.00 $71,658.00 $3,036,172.00 $2,943,804.00 $92,368.00
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $138,066.00 $137,481.00 $22,707.00 $2,175,788.00 $2,146,619.00 $29;169.00
Gross Profit $34,826.00 $33,520.00 $48,951.00 $860,384.00 $797,185.00 $63,199.00
Ratio to Net Sales 20.14% 19.60% 68.31% 28.34% 27.08%
Operating Expense:
Salaries,Wages, Benefits $14,282.00 $15,947.00 $26,133.00 $378,601.00 $369,116.00 $9,485.00
All Other Expenses $13,421.00 $13,821.00 $21,011.00 $364,535.00 $347,506.00 $17,029.00
Total Operating Expense $27,703.00 $29,768.00 $47,144.00 $743,136.00 $716,622.00 $26,514.00
Ratio to Net Sales 16.02% 17.41% 65.79% 24.48% 24.34%
Profit from Operations $7,123.00 $3,752.00 $1,807.00 $117,248.00 $80,563.00 $36,685.00
Other Income $78.00 $298.00 $3,494.00 $34,236.00 $27,895.00 $6,341.00
Net Income $7,201.00 $4,050.00 $5,301.00 $151,484.00 $108,458.00 $43,026.00
Ratio to Net Sales 4.17% 2.37% 7.40% 4.99% 3.686%
August-Net Income $16,552.00
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV 11 STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 08/31/00 $74,561.00 $57,051.00 $19,872.00 $151,484.00
YEAR TO DATE 08/31199 $38,724.00 $29,440.00 $40,294.00 $1 d8,458.00 (Audited)
INCREASE/DECREASE $35,837.00 $27,611.00 ($20,422.00) $43,026.00
August- 2000 City of St.Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I SAV II
Beginning Inventory: $244,689.94 Beginning Inventory: $246,562.17
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers ($361.10) Transfers $361.10
Adjustments ($5,111.99) Adjustments ($197.89)
Returns to Vendors ($10,424.87) Returns to Vendors ($3,231.77)
Add: Receiving $166,295.40 Add: Receiving $148,786.11
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($138,066.14) Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($137,480.79)
TOTAL $257,021.24 TOTAL $254,798.93
Total per Valuation Report $256,221.25 *** Total per Valuation Report $255,617.96 ***
Difference ($799.99) Difference $819.03
Beginning August 2000 Inventory $256,221.25 Beginning August 2000 Inventory $255,617.96
***Comes from Valuation Report ***Comes from Valuation Report
1999 Actual_ Profits (Audited) 2000 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II Stonehouse SAV 11 Stonehouse Profits Comparison
January $5,123.00 ($1,509.00) $4,418.00 $8,032.00 January $4,569.00 $1,343.00 $4,496.00 $10,408.00 $2,376.00
February $4,252.00 $4,800.00 $5,529.00 $22,613.00 February $2,511.00 $3,419.00 ($4,306.00) $12,032.00 ($10,581.00)
March $6,694.00 $4,882.00 $7,278.00 $41,467.00 March $9,915.00 $9,020.00 $9,039.00 $40,006.00 ($1,461.00)
April $7,020.00 ($6,956.00) $9,152.00 $50,683.00 April $15,157.00 $9,893.00 $6,060.00 $71,116.00 $20,433.00
May ($1,683.00) $8,570.00 $1,526.00 $59,096.00 May $11,957.00 $10,567.00 ($600.00) $93,040.00 $33,944.00
June $10,356.00 $11,297.00' $8,075.00 $88,824.00 June $13,557.00 $10,924.00 $141.00 $117,662.00 $28,838.00
July $7,238.00 $8,097.00 ($2,564.00) $101,595.00 July $9,694.00 $7,835.00 ($259.00) $134,932.00 $33,337.00
August ($276.00) $259.00 $6,880.00 $108,458.00 August $7,201.00 $4,050.00 $5,301.00 $151,484.00 $43,026.00
September $7,480A0 $5,350.00 $1,970.00 $123,258.00 September $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $151,484.00
October $5,738.00 $4,850.00 $7,413.00 $141,259.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $151,484.00
November $9,956.00 $14,749.00 $6,635.00 $172,599.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $151,484.00
December $6.936.00 $21.116.00 $4.574.00 $205,225.00 December $9 QQ $QQQ $Q,QQ $151,484.00
Total $68,834.00 $75,505.00 $60,886.00 $205,225.00 Total $74,561.00 $57,051.00 $19,872.00 $151,484.00
Increase/(Decrease) $35,837.00 $27,611.00 ($20,422.00) $43,026.00
Y-T-D By Store
W1
H. R. A.
AGENDA
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 26, 2000
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 H.R.A. AGENDA
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these
items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which
• event the item will be.removed from.Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A. - None.
VI. STAFF REPORTS.
VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
IX. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
X. ADJOURNMENT.
•
•
IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
A. H.R.A. Minutes - August 22, 2000
B. Claims
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
02 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES
3 August 22, 2000
4 I. CALL TO ORDER.
5 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Cavanaugh at 10:28 p.m.
6 II. ROLL CALL.
7 Commissioners present: Chairman Cavanaugh; Vice Chair Thuesen, Commissioners
8 Sparks, Horst and Hodson.
9 Councilmembers absent: None
10 Also present: Executive Director Michael Momson, City Attorney William Soth.
11 III. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 22,2000 H.R.A. AGENDA.
12 Motion by Sparks to approve the August 22, 2000 H.R.A. Agenda as presented.
13 Motion carried unanimously.
14 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
15 Motion by Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda, which included:
06 1. Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes of July.25, 2000; and
17 2. Claims for the H.RA.
18 Voting on the Motion: Cavanaugh, Horst, Sparks, Thuesen voted aye.
19 Hodson abstained due to absence at the meeting of July 25, 2000.
20 The Motion Carried
21 V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
22 A. Amendment to Tax Increment Financing_District#3 - Ramsey County (H.R.A.
23 Resolution 2000-008).
24 This item was not acted on.
25 B. Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Area#3 and on the Proposed Tax Increment
26 Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District#5 -Ramsey County(H.R.A.
27 Resolution 2000-009).
28 This item was not acted on.
29 C. Consider Redevelopment Agreement and Granting Business Subsidy to Hillcrest
30 Development for the Redevelopment of Apache Plaza and Surrounding Parcels (H.R.A.
31 Resolution 2000-010).
02 This item was not acted on.
33 VI. STAFF REPORTS.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes
• August 22, 2000
Page 2
1 None.
2 VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
3 None.
4 VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
5 None.
6 IX. ADJOURNMENT.
7 Motion by Horst to adjourn the meeting at 10:29 p.m.
8 Motion carried unanimously.
9 Respectfully submitted,
10 Carla Wirth
11 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
•
Following are the claims for the September 26, 2000 HRA meeting:
1. Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban... ............ ........$3,335.14
Hillcrest Development/Apache
2. Dorsey & Whitney... ...................................$3,519.40
Hillcrest Development/Apache
3. Dorsey & Whitney... ..................................... $415.00
Hitching Post
4. Dorsey & Whitney... ...................................$4,748.80
Apache Plaza TIF Matters
5. Dorsey & Whitney... ..................................... $140.00
St. Anthony Shopping Center
6. Hennepin County Treasurer..... ......................$7,458.70
Tires Plus Property Taxes
7. Midwest Planning & Design............................. $102.50
Kenzie Terrace - HRA Meeting
8. Springsted, Inc..... ......................................$7,760.32
Apache Development Study
9. Tushie, Montgomery Associates......................$3,470.25
St. Anthony Shopping Center
•
• Following are the claims for the September 26, 2000 HRA meeting:
1. Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban... .......................$3,028.34
Hillcrest Development/Apache
2. Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban... .......................$3,335.14
Hillcrest Development/Apache
3. Dorsey & Whitney... ...................................$3,519.40
Hillcrest Development/Apache
4. Dorsey & Whitney... ........... ........................ $415.00
Hitching Post
5. Dorsey & Whitney... ...................................$4,748.80
Apache Plaza TIF Matters
6. Dorsey & Whitney... ..................................... $140.00
St. Anthony Shopping Center
• 7. Hennepin County Treasurer..... ............ ........$7,458.70
Tires Plus-Property Taxes
8. Midwest Planning & Design............................. $102.50
Kenzie Terrace - HRA Meeting
9. Springsted, Inc..... ......................................$7,760.32
Apache Development Study
10. Tushie, Montgomery Associates..... ..................$3,470.25
St. Anthony Shopping Center
1
1
1 2001
1 Street and Utility
1 o Im rovement Project p
1 pa
1 for the City of
SatntAntfwn
V Y
Iffage
1 �v
'v
1 �3
1
i WSB Proi. No. 1065.511 September 26, 2000
1 Submitted to:
City of Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony Village, MN 55418
i
1 350 Westwood Lake Office
WSB 11441 Wayzata Boulevard
Mi nneapolis, MN 55426
612-5414800
1 &Associates,Inc. FAX 541-1700
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS
1 A
8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350 B.A.Mittelsteadt,P.E.
WSB Minneapolis, MN 55426 Bret A.weirs.P.E.
' Peter R.Willenbring,P.E.
Donald W.Sterna,P.E.
tel: 763-541-4800 Ronald B.Bray,P.E.
' &Associates, Inc. fax: 763-541-1700
September 21, 2000
1,
Honorable Mayor, City Council& Staff
' City of St Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699
' Re: 2001 Street Reconstruction Feasibility Report
WSB Project No. 1065-511
' Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff:
We are pleased to present to you the attached 2001 Street and Utility Improvements Feasibility Report.
' Wilson Street from 291 Avenue to 301 Avenue
• West Armour Terrace from Roosevelt Street to Silver Lake Road
• 301 Avenue from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road
' This project is proposed to be undertaken in 2001. In addition to the improvements contained within this feasibility
report,the Harding Street storm water improvement project,which is located north of 30h Avenue just west of Silver
' Lake Road, will have a bearing on this project. There may be some concerns related to the timing of the Harding
Street storm water holding pond construction and the street reconstruction project for 2001. Below are a couple of
alternatives to address this concern:
' 1) The Harding Street project would be let as a separate contract from the 2001 storm sewer improvement
project and the contractors would be required to complete the work on the Harding Street holding pond prior
to the contractor on the street project beginning construction on 301 Avenue.
2) The Harding Street project could be incorporated into the bid documents for the 2001 street and utility
improvements and the entire project bid as one project with one contractor.
' Either of the above options are feasible for the construction of both the Harding Street storm water pond and the
completion of 2001 street and utility improvements. However,there may be some cost savings overall on the project
by using one contractor to complete both projects.
' We would be happy to discuss this report and the above issues with you at your convenience. We will be available
to answer your questions at your September 26'Council Meeting, or you may call me at(612)277-5782.
' Sincerely,
WSB& Associates,Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer,P.E.
' Project Manager
Attachment
nm
M i n n e a p o l i s St . C l o u d
' Infrastructure Engineers Planners
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER F:IWPWIM1065-51Ueas-amd.wpd
FEASIBILITY REPORT
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2001 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA
September 26, 2000
1
1
' Prepared by:
WSB &Associates, Inc.
' 350 Westwood Lake Office Park
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
Ak
t
1
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project WSB
Feasibility Report
WSB Project No. 1065.511
1
OCERTIFICATION
0
D
0
0
1 hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional
engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
0 �-
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
0
Date: September 26, 2000 Reg. No. 24043
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report WSB
WSB Project No. 1065-511 0
0
n
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE SHEET
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CERTIFICATION SHEET
ITABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
I 2.1 Authorization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.2 Scope 1
2.3 Data Available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1 2.4 Project Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.5 Project History . . . . 2
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1 Sanitary Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2 Watermain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.3 Storm Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.4 Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1 Sanitary Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2 Watermain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.3 Storm Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.4 Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
I 4.5 Permits and Approvals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.6 Detour Routes . 6
' 5. FINANCING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.1 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost . 7
5.2 Funding Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' APPENDIX A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
' APPENDIX B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
COST TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
i
1
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project -
Feasibility Report
WSB Project No.1065.511 WSB
1
' 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 This project has been entitled the 2001 Street and Utility Improvement Project. This project
provides for the street and utility reconstruction on Wilson Street from 29`h Avenue to
30`h Avenue, 30`h Avenue NE from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road and West Armour
Terrace from Roosevelt Street NE to Silver Lake Road. The project includes the
construction of a storm sewer outlet and overflow from a future pond located between
Harding Street and Silver Lake Road North of 301 Avenue NE.
' This Feasibili ty R ep ort outlines the proposed construction of approxi m ately 3,900 feet of 30-
' foot (30) urban section streets, complete with bituminous paving and concrete curb and
gutter. Also proposed is the replacement of approximately 3,500 feet of water main, and
2,100 feet of sanitary sewer main,approximately 67 water services,and the new installation
1 of 3,100 feet of storm sewer ranging from 15 inches (15") to 48 inches (48") in diameter.
A total estimated project cost is $1,576,100. Funding for the project will come from the
city's street and utility reconstruction funds, the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, and special assessments.
' The project reconstruction can be completed, including the first lift of bituminous and all
restoration items, in 2001. The final lift of bituminous is proposed to be installed in 2002
after which the assessment hearing will be held.
1 This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineerin g standpoint oint and
should be constructed as proposed herein.
1
1
1
1
1
1 City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
1 WSB Project No.1065-511
Page 1
2. INTRODUCTION
' 2.1 Authorization
On June 27, 2000 the City of St. Anthony City Council authorized the preparation
of an engineering Feasibility Report for the 2001 Street and Utility Improvement
Project. This project was authorized under City of St. Anthony Resolution 00-056.
' 2.2 Scope
1 This project provides for the street and utility reconstruction on Wilson Street from
29t1 Avenue to 30'h Avenue,30t1 Avenue NE from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road
and West Amour Terrace from Roosevelt Street NE to Silver Lake Road.
The project also proposes to replace the current storm sewer system in Wilson Street,
from 29t1 Avenue to 30t1 Avenue for future connection at 31s' Avenue NE; 30i1
Avenue NE, to provide outlet for future pond north of 30'h Avenue and East of
Harding Street; and West Armour Terrace,to provide an outlet from a low area north
of West Armour Terrace.
It is also proposed that the existing 12-inch(12")VCP sanitary sewer pipe in Wilson
Street from 29t1 Avenue to 30th Avenue be replaced to a lower elevation to eliminate
storm sewer conflicts at 30t1 Avenue NE and West Armour Terrace, and to resolve
sanitary sewer issues in this portion of the City. Furthermore,existing watermain is
proposed to be replaced on Wilson Street from West Armour Terrace to 30`h Avenue
NE, West Armour Terrace from Roosevelt Street NE to Silver Lake Road, and 30"
Avenue NE from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road.
1 In summary, street, sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer improvements are
all proposed as part of this project.
2.3 Data Available
Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following:
• City of St. Anthony Record Drawings
' City of St. Anthony Topographic Maps
• Interviews and discussion with property owners
• Discussions from Public Information Meetings
' Field observations of area
• Engineering analysis of selected flood problem areas within the City of St.
Anthony, March 1998
' City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
' WSB Project No.1065-511
Page 1
M
2.4 Project Location
The project is located in the south central portion of the City of St. Anthony and
includes the following streets:
• Wilson Street from 29`h Avenue NE to 30`h Avenue NE
• 30`h Avenue NE from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road
' West Armour Terrace from Roosevelt Street NE to Silver Lake Road
The project area is identified on Figure 1 in Appendix A of this report.
2.5 Project History
This project was initiated through the recognition of the following conditions in the
project area:
• Deterioration of street conditions
• Reoccurring street flooding and inundation of homes from storm water
• The lack of capacity in the sanitary sewer system which results in frequent
back-up of the sanitary line into tributary homes
• The streets, sanitary sewer, water main lines are approximately 40 years old
and are exhibiting deterioration problems
As a result of City Staff recommendations, storm water management task force
' recommendations, engineering analysis of selected flood problem areas within the
City of St. Anthony recommendations, and preliminary recommendations from the
Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study; the City Council provided funding in the 2001
budget for street and utility improvements. In addition, funding was also provided
from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to complete improvements
' within the project area. On June 27, 2000 the St. Anthony City Council authorized
the preparation of an engineering feasibility report for the 2001 Street and Utility
Improvement Project.
The project includes the construction of a new trunk storm sewer system to
accommodate storm flows which currently inundate structures and flood streets in
excess of two feet in the project area.Continuing inundation of streets has lead to the
deterioration of catch basins and pavements within the project area.
' City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
WSB Project No.1065-511
' Page 2
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Sanitary Sewer
1 The sanitary sewer system in the project area consists of nine-inch (9") and 12-inch
(12") diameter vitrified clay pipe (VCP) installed in the 1950's. The joint sealing
material In use at that. time was typically an oakum and bituminous material.
' Previous internal inspections with a specially designed television camera have found
the pipe to be in generally fair structural condition with numerous offset joints,some
cracked segments,some root intrusion and mineral deposits at joints,and some dips
with solids deposition.
The 12" sanitary sewer on Wilson Street and 9" on 30"Avenue NE will be lowered
to resolve sanitary sewer conflicts caused by the construction of a new trunk storm
sewer system.
' 3.2 Watermain
The existing water distribution mains in the project area were installed in the 1950's
' of cast iron pipe (CIP). The service connections are expected to have lead
"goosenecks" and galvanized or copper service lines to the individual homes. In
general, the system has provided good service but main breaks are becoming more
likely as the pipes approach 50 years of service. In addition, the lead goosenecks
may be a source of lead in the residential water supply and the cast iron pipes are
' probably heavily corroded and possibly leaking.
3.3 Storm Sewer
tThe existing storm sewer consists of a 36-inch(36")RCP which flows from north to
south along Wilson Street from 30' Avenue to 291 Avenue. The existing storm
' sewer on 30'Avenue consists of 12-inch(12")and 15-inch(15"). Also,the existing
storm sewer on West Armour Terrace is 18 inches (18").
' The storm water conveyance system within Wilson Street is considered a trunk
system which receives water from approximately 330 acres. During heavy rainfall
conditions,the storm sewer is not adequate to collect the runoff and convey it from
the street area. Intersections regularly are flooded with a few inches to a few feet of
water. In some cases the water level is high enough to flow from the roadway into
adjacent garages and basements.
3.4 Streets
' Wilson Street, 30'h Avenue NE and West Armour Terrace are all 30 foot(30') wide
streets with concrete curb and gutter and driveways. No borings were taken for these
' streets but other borings in the area have indicated there was approximately 5 inches
1
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
' WSB Project No.1065-511
Page 3
(5") bituminous over two and one-half feet of silty sand fill. Soil borings will be
completed during final design.
1
1
1
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
' WSB Project No.1065-511
Page 4
' 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
' 4.1 Sanitary Sewer
The existing 12-inch(12")VCP will be reconstructed with 12" PVC on Wilson Street
from 29`h Avenue NE to 30`h Avenue NE and the existing 9-inch (9") VCP will be
reconstructed with 10-inch(10")PVC at a lower elevation to eliminate conflicts with
proposed storm sewer.
' The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are shown on Figure 2 in Appendix
A.
' 4.2 Watermain
The existing water mains will be entirely or partially exposed by the excavation
required for the sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements. In addition, many
of the water service lines to the individual properties will be removed or
disconnected for a period of time. The excavation for the other utilities provides a
timely opportunity for improvements to the water distribution system before
significant problems are experienced.
The proposed water main improvements consist of replacing the existing 6" mains
with new 8" ductile iron pipe mains and copper service taps and lines. This will
' improve delivery of potable water and fire flow volume at reasonable pressure and
head loss.
' Replacement of the service taps and lines should improve the water quality by
reducing the potential for lead to enter the system and possibly increase the pressure
by providing a clean service pipe.
The proposed water system improvements are shown on Figure 3 in Appendix A.
' 4.3 Storm Sewer
The proposed storm sewer improvements include replacing existing 36-inch (36")
storm sewer on Wilson Street from 291 Avenue NE to 30'Avenue NE with 48-inch
(48") storm sewer at a lower elevation to accommodate the outlet for the future
' stormwater pond.
The existing 15-inch(15")storm sewer on 30'Avenue NE will be reconstructed with
' new 18-inch(18")to 27-inch(27")storm sewer at lower elevation to provide outlet
from future pond north of 30'Avenue NE. The existing 18-inch(18")storm sewer
on West Armour Terrace will be replaced with 15-inch(15")and 21-inch(21")storm
' sewer at lower elevation to provide a storm sewer outlet from a low area north of
West Armour Terrace.
' City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
' WSB Project No.1065-511
Page 5
M
' The proposed storm water system improvements are shown on Figure 4 in
Appendix A.
' 4.4 Street
The reconstruction of the existing streets is intended to improve the design strength
of the pavement system and provide a street surface that will provide an extended life
for the City of St.Anthony. The existing street widths will be maintained in the new
' street to minimize impacts on the existing driveways, boulevards, and landscaping.
The proposed street reconstruction areas are shown on Figure 5 and the typical
tsection is shown on Figure 6 in Appendix A.
After the excavation,a geotextile fabric will be placed to separate the underlying soft
1 materials from the granular materials. One foot (F) of granular material of"sand
cushion" will be placed on the geotextile fabric to provide a firm base for the six
inches (6") of Class 5 aggregate base and three and one-half inches (3-1/2") of
' bituminous pavement.
4.5 Permits and Approvals
' Reconstruction of the existing sanitary sewers and water mains,will require a permit
from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and the Minnesota
' Department of Health, respectively.
4.6 Detour Routes
' The project will require significant excavation and disposal of unacceptable material
from the existing street area, and a supply of significant volumes of granular base,
aggregate base and bituminous pavement materials. This effort will require closing
the roads under construction and increasing loaded truck traffic on the streets
' adjacent to the construction area. Adequately signed detours will be identified to
direct traffic around the construction zones and notify users of the increased truck
and construction activity. In order to accommodate the property owners along the
' excavated roads,temporary parking on the adjacent streets may be necessary during
the periods of time when vehicle access is not possible.
1
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
WSB Project No.1065-511
Page 6
M
5. FINANCING
' 5.1 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
Detailed breakdowns of the Cost Opinion for the various construction areas are
included in Appendix B. The opinion of cost incorporated the construction costs
experienced during 1999 and 2000, and include a 10% continency factor.
' Administrative costs are projected at 30% of the construction cost and include
engineering, legal, financing and other administrative costs. A summary of the
project costs is as follows:
' Sanitary Sewer Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $196,710.
• Watermain Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $326,700.
1 Storm Sewer Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $323,500.
• Street Reconstruction . $729,200.
' Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,576,100.
5.2 Funding Sources
' The total project cost is projected to be approximately$1,576,100. Funding for the
project will come from a variety of sources including City is Street and Utility
' Reconstruction Funds (Public Improvement Bonds), Special Assessments to
benefitting properties, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
' The City's assessment policy for street assessment is based on front footage along
improved roads. The property owner is assessed 35% of total street and local
' drainage construction costs. Each property owner that receives a new water service
will be assessed a flat rate of$400 per service hookup to new watermain.
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
WSB Project No. 1065-511
Page 7
' Project Costs and Proposed Funding Sources
Funding Sources
Proposed Improvements Total
' Assessable City MDNR
I. Street Reconstruction $255,220 $473,980 $0 $729,200
II. Watermain Cost *$30,000 $296,700 $0 $326,700
III. Storm Sewer Reconstruction $46,400 $0 $277,100 $323,500
1 IV. Sanitary Cost $0 $0 $196,000 $196,000
1 Total** $331,620 $770,680 $473,100 $1,575,400
* Watermain is assessed at $400 per connection. This project contains 75 connections.
' ** This project anticipates issuing approximately $1.2 million public improvement bonds.
1
1
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
WSB Project No.1065-511
Page 8
M
6. Project Schedule
' The proposed schedule for this improvement is as follows:
Task Completion Date
1. Order Feasibility Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 27, 2000
' 2. Hold Neighborhood Public Information Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 20, 2000
3. Accept Feasibility Report and order Plans and Specifications . . . . . . . . September 26, 2000
4. Approve Plans and i
pp Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids . . . . . October 24, 2000
5. Receive Bids, Compute Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 12, 2000
6. Approve Three Resolution on Improvement Hearing
and Special Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . January 9, 2001
' 7. Hold Public Hearing for Project and Assessments, Award Bid
and Call for Bond Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 13, 2001
8. Award Sale of Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 13, 2001
9. Hid construction meeting with residents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May, 2001
10. Begin construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
May, 2001
' 11. Substantial completion of construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September, 2001
' 12. Certify Assessments to a County Auditor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August, 2001
13. Final completion of construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July, 2002
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
' WSB Project No. 1065-511
Page 9
' 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION
' Project costs are anticipated to be approximately$1,576,146,which includes the total street and
utility reconstruction of Wilson Street, West Armour Terrace and 30`h Avenue NE.
' Due to the inadequate capacity of the sanitary sewer mains and the storm mains, this project is
both feasible and necessary from an engineering standpoint. The installation of the sanitary and
storm sewer will require the total removal of the existing street and the partial removal and
' exposure of the existing water distribution lines. Under these conditions it is both feasible and
necessary to replace the existing street and water main. Furthermore, due to the location and
condition of the existing utilities,the available street right-of-way,the existing soils conditions,
and the need to provide utility service to all of the properties in the project area, other methods
of improving the utility systems and the roadway are not feasible or cost effective.
Based on our analysis and data presented, the proposed project is feasible, necessary and cost
effective from an engineering standpoint. We recommend the reconstruction of the sanitary
sewer, water main, storm sewer and streets as detailed this report.
1
1
1
1
City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report
' WSB Project No. 1065-511
Page 10
1
1
1
' APPENDIX A
FIGURES
1
1
' City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report A
WSB Project No.1065.511 WSB
t
I
' I o
I HIH
I p.N NY z
HILL AV N E Tm � �
1 I J
T I
' I N AV E .
I
w Project Location E
I U�
. E .
i
Lij
i w T C
I �
' 2C w
3 A . N >
a
>l U TERRA C
DI
OI
m,
VIE . . I LL
Z! I-- F-
OI w Mw w Z w fy
0.
i R
Et ��QO TFFT
' I L] w w
> H
i Ln Z
CO] X 0 J
I GO
' I 27 T H
200 100 0 200 <00
I
1 SCALE IN
- 350 Westwood Lake Office Project Location Map WSB Project No. 1065.511 Date:September 26,2000
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
SB Minneapolis,MN 55426 2001 Street & Utility Improvements
//-(�
612-5414800 for h Asmciates,Inc. FAX 541-1700 Figure 1
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS St. Anthony, Minnesota
m=\1065-511\feos\fig-01.dgn
1
1 I °
11 HHH "
z HILL AV N E
1 PN
I J
ND AV .
1 I
I
I w N VI . E .
1 I °
I �
1 WVT . E .
I
I �
1 I TE C
j � w
1 I W
13:
I � 3 A �
I
PN
QI
U TERFACE
wl ° G T
1 —JI _
ml
9 T �VE - . E .
1 zl �
0j '�' [TTFM�AR�4� w w
1 w
zj � �
I R
I
TMT
�pQO
1 w w
I > 4141
w
0
I �
1 j
27 T H
200 100 0 200 400
SCALE IN FEET
1
- 350 Westwood Lake Office Sanitary Sewer VVSB Project No. '065.511 Date:September 26,2000
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
1
rrSB Minneapolis,MN 55426 2001 Street & Utility Improvements
612-541 4800 for&Asroclarer,/nc-. FAX 541-1700 Figure 2
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS St.. Anthony, Minnesota
1 m:\1065-511\teas\fig-02.dgn
( I
z HILL AV N E
I J
N AV .
!
I
w N VI E .
I I °
I �
( I ! o . E .
I
I
I j CC
TE C
I w
3 A E.
I Q
¢I U T �
LU G T
I �I
M, 9 T VE . . E .
I zl
w w
0I w 1 w
I
Z.
�I nV)
Ij T • A Y
i R
I - � l Q`OQO
w w
w I 41HLI 1 1 �
oJ
o
j 27 T
200 +oo o zoo 400
SCALE IN FEET
- 350 Westwood Lake Office Watermain WSB Project No. 1065.511 Date September 26,2000
8441 Wayzata Boulevard — —
IrrSB Minneapolis,MN 55426 2001 Street & Utility Improvements
— 612 541 4800 for cG Associates,Inc, SAX 541-1700 Figure 3
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS St. Anthony, Minnesota
m:\7065-511\feos\fiq-03.dgn
1
1 I o
Z
HILL AV N E
1 I PN N�
Lij
I J
N AV .
1 I
I
I w N VI . E .
1 I
I �
1 . E .
I
I �
1 I T R HA C
j � w
1 I w
� w
I 3 q N
1 Q gE
LLJ
>I i OUR TERRACE
LU
1 01
ml
j 9 T VE . . E .
1 ZI
j L' ' M U R Y w w
1 w
z�
�I N V)
��p ,.
I R
Q-pP0
1 W w> 6H.L I
0
I 01
1 j 27 TH E .
100 100 0 700 400
SCALE IN FEET
1
- 350 Westwood Lake Office Street Construction WS6 Project No. 1065.511 Date September 26,2000
6441 Wayzata Boulevard
' WVB Minneapolis,MN 55426 2001 Street & Utility Improvements
-(� 612-541 4800 for&Asaociales,lnc. FAX 541-1700 Figure 5
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS St. Anthony, Minnesota
' mA1065-511\fens\f hg-05.dg,
1
' WILSON STREET
30th AVENUE 71
' WEST ARMOUR TERRACE
15' B - B 15' B - B
' I
•-- 2.0 2.0 618 CURB & GUTTER
% �
' 61 1 1/2' - TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT DRAIN TILE
2" - TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (TYPICAL)
6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE ( 100 7 CRUSHED ROCK ) BOTH SIDES
' 1 ' GRANULAR MATERIAL
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ( MN/DOT 3733, TYPE V)
1
1
1
- 350 Westwood Lake Office TYPICAL SECTIONS WSB Project No. 1065.511 Date September 26,2000
8441 Wayzata Boulevard — —
' ,A SB Minneapolis,MN 55426 2001 Street & Utility Improvements
- 612-641�O for
&.lssocfatea,Inc. FAX 641-1700 Figure 6
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS St. Anthony, Minnesota
' mA1065-511\fens\flq-06.dgn
1
1
1
1
' APPENDIX B
COST TABLES
1
1
1
1
' City of St.Anthony-2001 Street&Utility Improvement Project
Feasibility Report ,AA
WSB Project No.1065.511 I'/�
1
2001 Street& Utility Construction Project Opinion of Probable Cost
' City of St. Anthony,MN
Schedule A -Street Construction
' Unit Cost
Item No. Description Quantity Unit Total
I Mobilization I LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
' 2 Clear and Grub Trees 5 Each $500.00 $2,500.00
3 Remove Bituminous Pavement 12,300 SY $2.50 $30,750.00
4 Remove Curb and Gutter _ - j_ 7,750 1 Lin FT ! $2.00 $15,500.00
5 Remove Concrete Pavement j 900 ! Sq Yd $5.00 $4,500.00
6 Remove Concrete Walk 100 Sq Ft _ $1.00 ! $100.00
7 Bituminous Sawcut 450 Lin Ft $3.00 $1,350.00
8 Concrete Sawcut 850 Lin Ft $5.00 $4,250.00
9 Sub grade Excavation 9,100 Cu Yd $6.00 $54,600.00
10 Select Granular Borrow 5,800 Cu.Yd $12.00_ $69,600.00
1 1 Class 5 Aggregate Base(100%Crushed) j 4,500 j Ton $11.00 $49,500.00
12 :_Typc 41-Bituminous Wear Course(1-1/2") 1,100 Ton S31.00 534,100.00
13 Type 31 Bituminous Base Course 2" 1,500 Ton $30.00 $45,000.00
' 14 Bituminous Tack Coat 700 Gal $1.50 $1,050.00
15 B618 Curb and Gutter 7,750 Lin Ft $7.00 . $54,250.00
16 : 4"Concrete Walk - 100 ! Sq Ft 52.00 $200.00
j 17 6"Concrete Driveway Pavement 1,100 Sci Yd $32.00 $35,200.00
18 Bituminous Driveway Pavement 230 Sq Yd $18.00 $4,140.00
' 19 Sod(including topsoil and fertilizer 11,000 S Yd $2.00 $22,000.00
20 2-1/2"Trees 5 Tree $400.00 $2,000.00
21 6"Perforated PE Pipe Drain 7,750 Lin Ft $5.00 $38,750.00
' 22 Type V Geotextile Fabric 13,750 1 Sq Yd $1.50 $20,625.00
Subtotal $509,965.00
' +10%Contingencies $50,996.50
Subtotal $560,961.50
' +30%Administrative 1 $168,288.45
Grand Total 1 $729,249.95
1
1
' City of St.Anthony- Feasibility Report
2001 Street and Utility Construction Project ,wA
WSB Project No. 1065-511 WSB
1
2001 Street& Utility Construction Project Opinion of Probable Cost
City of St. Anthony,MN
1 Schedule B-Sanitary Server
Unit
Item No. Description Quantity Unit Cost Total
' 1 Remove Sanitary Sewer all sizes 2,060 Lin Ft $3.00 $6,180.00
2 Remove Manholes 4 Each $250.00 $1,000.00
3 Remove Sanita Services
' Each $100.00 - $2,900.00
4 12" PVC SDR 26 - 600 Lin Ft- $38.00 $22,800.00
- - - --- 1 , - -$35.00
---
-!— -- - -
10" PVC SDR 35 1,460 Lin Ft
5 � $51,100.00
6 48"Diameter Manholes 110 Lin Ft $150.00 $16,500.00
7 Castings 8 Each $300.00 $2,400.0011
i
' 8 8"Outside Drop Sections 5 Each $1,000.0 $5,000.00
9 I 10"x 6"PVC W e 29 Each $80.00 1 $2,320.00
10 6"PVC SDR 26 Service 870 _� Lin Ft_ $20.00 $17,400.00
I I Foundation Material , 200 ' Ton $7.00 $1,400.00
12 Sanitary Sewer Inspection 2,060 Lin Ft j $1.00 $2,060.00
' 13 Connect to Existing Sanitary Service 29 Each $100.00 $2,900.00
14 Connect to Existing Sanitag Sewer 6 Each $600.00 $3,600.00
Subtotal S 137,560.00
+10%Contingencies $13,756.00
Subtotal $151,316.00
' +30%Administrative $45,394.80
Grand Total $196,710.80
1
1
1
' City of St.Anthony- Feasibility Report
2001 Street and Utility Construction Project r A
WSB Project No. 1065-511
' a
Asw"W I-
2001 Street& Utility Construction Project Opinion of Probable Cost
City of St. Anthony,MN
Schedule C-- 11'alermain
Unit Cost
Item No. Description Quantity Unit Total
' 1 Remove Watermain 3,520 Lin Ft $3.00 $10,560.00
Remove Gate Valves 11 Each $100.00 $1,100.00
3 Remove Water Service 75 -1 Each---i--- $100.00. $7,500.00
4 Remove Curb Box 75 Each $50.00 $3,750.00
5 Salvag
Hydrants 5 Each i $500.00 $2,500.00
_e"y
6 8"DIP Class 52 Watermain 3,500 Lin Ft $32.00 $112,000.00
7 6" DIP Class 52 Watermain 90 Lin Ft $30.00 $2,700.00
8 8"Gate Valve 9 Each $700.00 $6,300.00
9 6"Gate Valve 6 Each $500.00 $3,000.00
10 Hydrants 6 Each $1,600.00 $9,600.00
I I I"Corporation Stop 75 Each $40.00 53,000.00
i 12 1"Curb Stop and Box 75 Each $90.00 $6,750.00
1=3 1"Copper 2,370 Lin Ft $10.00 $23'700.00
Fittings 4,700 Lbs $2.00 $9,400.00
15 Connect to Existing Water Service 75 Each $200.00 $15,000.00
16 Connect to Existing Watermain 6 Each $600.00 $3,600.00
17 7 Te
- CoTn
Temporary Water Service 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00
Subtotal $228,460.00
+10%Contingencies $22,846.00
Subtotal $251,306.00
+30%Administrative 1 $75,391.801
Grand Total $326,697.80
City of St.Anthony— Feasibility Report
2001 Street and Utility Construction Project
WSB Project No. 1065-511 WSB
AMMMM�
A Anodon.I-
2001 Street&Utility Construction Project Opinion of Probable Cost
' City of St.Anthony,MN
t Schedule D-Storm Sewer
Item No. ; Description I Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
I Remove Storm Sewer All sizes 2,700 Lin Ft $8.0 $21,600.00
1 2 Remove Manholes 6 Each $300.0 $1,800.00
3 Remove Catch Basins 14 Each $250.00 $3,500.00
' 4 _48" RCP Class III 594 Lin Ft $100.00; $59,400.00
f
5 36 RCP Class lll_ _ 73 Lin Ft _ $60.00, $4,380.00
6 27"RCP Class III 500 Lin Ft $40.00- $20,000.00
7 24"RCP Class III 40 Lin Ft $37.0 $1,480.00
8 21"RCP Class III 803 Lin Ft $35.0 $28,105.00
' 9 18"RCP Class III 275 Lin Ft $30.0 $8,250.00
10 15"RCP Class III 850 Lin Ft _ $26.0 $22,100.00,
11 48" Diameter Manhole i 42 Lin Ft $200.00; $8,400.00
1 - - ....-- - to --------- - ---- ---- - - ---- — - -- -------- ---
12 60" Diameter Manhole 34 Lin Ft $250.00, $8,500.00
L 13 72" Diameter Manhole 30 Lin Ft $270.00 $8,100.00
t14 84"Diameter Manhole 10 Lin Ft $480.0 $4,800.00
15 Manhole Casting___-_ 14 Each $300.0 _- $4,200.00-!
16 Catch Basins I 22 Each $900.00, $19,800.00
17 18" RCApron wlTrash Guard 1 Each $800.00 $800.00
18 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer 2 Each $500.00 $1,000.00
' Subtotal $226,215.00
+10%Contingencies $22,621.50
' Subtotal $248,836.50
+30%Administrative $74,650.95
Grand Total $323,487.45
Total Project Costs
' Schedule A-Streets $729,249.95
Schedule B-Sanitary Sewer $196,710.80
tSchedule C-Watermain $326,697.80
Schedule D-Storm Sewer $323,487.45
Total-Schedules A-D i $1,576,146.00
' City of St.Anthony- Feasibility Report
2001 Street and Utility Construction Project ���
WSB Project No. 1065-511