HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 01222002 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
102956
Box: 29
Folder. CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 01222002
H.R.A. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
January 22, 2002
7:00 PM, Council Chambers
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the Following
Items:
1. Approval of January 22, 2002 City Council Meeting Agenda. Action
requested.
11. Proclamations and Recognitions.
III. , Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are
requested to come to the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk's record and limit their
remarks to rive minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this
time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on
an upcoming agenda.
IV. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
1. Consider January 8, 2002 Council meeting minutes. (pp. 1 - 12)
2. Consider licenses and permits. (p. 13)
3. Consider payment of claims. (pp. 14 - 17)
4. Resolution 02-018, re: Consider Fire Department mutual aid. (pp. 18 - 19)
5. Resolution 02-019, re: Consider Assessment Agreement with Hennepin County.
(pp. 20 - 31)
6. Resolution 02-020, re: Order feasibility report for flood abatement improvements for
Silver Lane. (pp. 32 - 35)
Page 2
V. Public Hearings - None.
VI. Reports From Commissions and Staff
VII. General Policy Business of the Council
1. Resolution 02-021, re: Consider Lease Agreement for charitable gambling at the
Stonehouse. Action required. (pp. 36 - 36A)
2. Resolution 02-022, re: Consider Application for Premises Permit Renewal for
charitable gambling at the Stonehouse. Action required. (pp. 37 - 39)
3. Ordinance 2002-001, re: Requiring licenses for physical culture and health services
(2nd reading). Action requested. (pp. 40 - 48)
4. Presentation of residential survey. (pp. 49 - 68)
VIII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers
IX. Information and Announcements
X. Miscellaneous Informational Documents
XI. Adjournment
1
_ 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 January 8, 2002
6
7
8 CALL TO ORDER
9 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
10
11 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
12 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
13
14 ROLL CALL.
15 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks,Thuesen,and Faust.
16 Absent: None.
17 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson; City Attorney Jerry Gilligan.
18
19 APPOINTMENT TO CITY COUNCIL VACANCY/SWEARING IN.
20 Mayor Hodson requested a motion for the swearing in of Jerry Faust.
21
22 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to appoint Jerry Faust for the remaining two years for the vacant
23 seat on the City Council.
24
25 Councilmember Sparks stated that she still felt that the City Council should have gone through an
26 appointment process.
27
28 Mayor Hodson stated that Faust's credentials speak for themselves.
29
30 Motion carried 3-1, Councilmember Sparks opposed.
31
32 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
33 ITEMS.
34
35 I. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 8,2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
36 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the City Council Meeting Agenda of January 8,
37 2002.
38
39 . Motion carried unanimously.
40
41 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
42 None.
43
44 III. COMMUNITY FORUM.
45 Resident Hawken Light was present to address the Council regarding the gymnasium that is
46 located in the Community Center, as well as teen activities in the community.
47
48 Light stated that he has tried to use the gymnasium several times. He indicated that he has
49 spoken to the various people that schedule time in the gym. He questioned why the fee-rate was
2
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 2
1 so high for private use, citing a$50.00 per hour fee. He continued that he had requested use for
2 a church basketball team, and was told that the fee could only be lowered to $30.00.
3
4 Light asked if the Sports Boosters were required to pay a certain fee when they use the gym.
5 Mornson stated that they do not have to pay anything for use of the gym. He stated that they
6 contributed to the storage room of the gym, as well as the planning of the actual building.
7
8 Mornson continued that the City has an agreement with both the Sports Boosters and the School
9 District that community services and the Sports Boosters get first priority based on the fact that
10 they both provide youth services to the community.
11
12 Light asked if the church basketball team would be able to use the gym free of charge,provided
13 they use their own balls and have adult supervision. He continued that playing basketball is
14 good activity for them and keeps them busy.
15
16 Light asked if the Council knew what was happening with the proposed teen-program
17 development, stating that he has heard promises, but seen nothing. He added that it is
18 challenging to find things to do in the community, and that venturing out to neighboring cities
19 constitutes getting a ride, or having a license and access to a car.
20 .
21 Councilmember Sparks asked if Light was aware of the community prevention coalition, and
22 highlighted the Safe and Affordable Activities for Youth Committee led by Sharon Walker. She
23 continued that they have tried to focus on a number of activities, and that,while no progress has
24 been made, the Teen Center has been mentioned. She concluded that she felt his request was
25 valid for free use of the Community Center.
26
27 Mornson stated that gym fees, and allowing church groups free access, was discussed a while
28 ago, and that it was determined back then that they should have some sort of fee because of all of
29 the churches in the area and the potential for them to monopolize the gym.
30
31 Councilmember Sparks stated that she would like to look at youth activities and how they charge
32 for them. Mayor Hodson agreed with Councilmember Sparks and stated that he frequently hears
33 complaints of the lack of activities for youths within the City of St. Anthony.
34
35 Mayor Hodson encouraged Light to continue with his participation in the Safe and Affordable
36 Activities for Youth Committee.
37
38 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he has wanted to address this issue prior to this evening. He
39 added that they should to discuss hiring someone as a monitor for the gym at the City Council
40 annual goal-setting meeting.
41
42 The Council thanked Light for his presence and input.
43
44 Jerry Faust was sworn in by City Clerk Connie Kroeplin, at 7:16 p.m.
45
3
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 3
1 Mayor Hodson asked if there were any other residents wishing to address the Council at this
2 time. Hearing none, Mayor Hodson moved forward with the agenda.
. 3
4 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
5 1. Approve December 11, 2001 City Council meeting minutes.
6 2. Approve licenses and permits.
7 3. Approve claims.
8 4. Resolutions 02-001 through 02-011 (annual "housekeeping"resolutions)
9 001-Designate Acting Mayor for 2002
10 002-Authorize persons to make certain transactions to City accounts
11 003-Designate official depository for City funds
12 004-Designate Public Health Officer
13 005-Designate legal newspaper
14 006-010-Designate Mayor and Councilmember's participation in outside organizations
15 5. Ordinance 2001-004, re: Wireless Telecommunication Towers and Facilities(third
16 readin .
17
18 Mayor Hodson indicated that Dr. Carr has been the City's Public Health Officer for nearly
19 twenty-five years, and wanted to resign from the position. Mayor Hodson indicated that he had
20 an individual in mind for the position of Public Health Officer for the City of St. Anthony, and
21 would like to pull the item from the Consent Agenda at this time.
22
23 Mayor Hodson stated that some corrections have been made in the Councilmember's packets to
24 Resolutions 02-008 through 02-010.
25
26 Morrison added that Councilmember Sparks would fill-in as Acting Mayor, in the event of
27 Mayor Hodson's absence.
28
29 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda, as amended above.
30
31 Motion carried unanimously.
32 "
33 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
34 1. Consider amendment to redevelopment plans and Chandler Place Tax Increment Financing
35 District (Resolution 02-015)
36 City Attorney Jerry Gilligan reviewed the amendment. He stated that the amendment includes
37 some additional property in the area subject to the redevelopment plans for the purpose of
38 making expenditures of TIF with respect to that, which amends the budget for the Chandler TIF
39 District to authorize those expenditures.
40
41 Morrison reviewed the third section of the resolution with the Council which stated that they
42 have the ability to complete an internal loan, if necessary,from one district to the Chandler Tax
43 Increment District.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 4
1 Motion by Councilmember Faust to approve Resolution 02-015, re: Considering amendment to
2 redevelopment plans and Chandler Place Tax Increment Financing District.
3
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5
6 VI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
7 1. Planning Commission-December 18. 2001:
8 A. Village North,.LLP;.for 2801-37`'Avenue NE; conditional use permit for
9 packaging of wax and other components into candle products(Resolution 02-
10 016).
11
12 Planning Commissioner Steeves came forward to provide the Council with a
13 background on the property at Village North. He stated that the Planning
14 Commission concluded that the issue is a.nuisance of smell, thus,very difficult to
15 determine a way in which it could be measured.
16
17 Commissioner Steeves added that the Planning Commission recommends that
18 they grant Essenco a 120-day temporary conditional use permit. He stated that the
19 120-day period would essentially be a test period after which the applicant would
20 come back before the Planning Commission who would then be able to either
21 apply appropriate conditions to the permit, or determine that the odor was
22 injurious to property owners.
23
24 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he appreciated the thoroughness of the
25 Planning Commission regarding the Village North property. He highlighted the
26 fact that Essenco,the candle-making company, ceased their operations, but there
27 was still an odor that came from the building.
28
29 Commissioner Steeves indicated that they were unable to ascertain exactly when
30 the operations ceased, thus, making it difficult to determine the extent of the
31 nuisance of the odor.
32
33 Councilmember Thuesen questioned if the 120-day period was excessive.
34
35 Commissioner Steeves stated that the Planning Commission felt the
36 recommendation that they have made was the best that they were able to come up
37 with at the time.
38
39 Gilligan highlighted that attaching a period of time to the permit meant that
40 Essenco would need to come back and re-apply for their permit before the end of
41 the 120-day period.
42
43 Councilmember Horst stated that, if any problems persisted related to odor,he
44 would not be in favor of approving the permit.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 5
1 Ken Solie, owner of the property, came forward and indicated that he and
2 Essenco did not feel that the 120-day period was enough time to run the business,
3 discover a problem and take care of the problem. He indicated that.Charles
4 McGinley, McGinley and Associates, was present to address the Council and
5 related concerns.
6
7 McGinley stated that the Metropolitan Council has been running an odor
8 laboratory at which odors are measured and quantified for over 20 years. He
9 continued that St. Croix Sensory Laboratories,the laboratory to which he is
10 associated, could assist the City of St. Anthony in developing an odor ordinance,
11 if they chose to do so.
12
13 McGinley continued that several types of establishments emit odors of some sort.
14 He stated that he has been working with Essenco for seven days and has
15 established a couple of ways that they could improve the ventilation from within
16 the building.
17
18 McGinley reviewed the different elements of odor measurement. He stated that
19 whether an individual likes, or dislikes an odor is the only subjective parameter of
20 odor. .
21
22 Councilmember Horst expressed his concern with the difficulty of guaranteeing
23 that Essenco follows through with their promises to fix problems associated with
24 odor.
25
26 Councilmember Sparks asked what level of smell was acceptable,and when that
27 line may be crossed. McGinley responded that there are two ways to measure
28 acceptability standards. He indicated that they were able to limits on the length of
29 time that the smell was accepted (e.g.: 98%acceptability rate means that the odor
30 cannot be smelled more than 2% of the time through the.course of a year.)
31
32 Councilmember Sparks confirmed that if the City chooses to set standards,it was
33 possible. McGinley concurred.
34
35 Mayor Hodson stated he felt it was a difficult standard. He indicated that,
36 although he was struggling with the issue, he felt that they have a considerable
37 amount of options for the space that would be much more objectionable.
38
39 The Council discussed the situation related to the nature of businesses and zoning,
40 as well as their desire to be sensitive to residents.
41
42 Councilmember Faust mentioned the training from Metropolitan Council.
43 McGinley stated that the inspectors who are trained to quantify odors are trained
44 in different ways. He continued that frequency of odor could be far more
45 important than strength of odor when assessing an odor.
GD
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 6
2 Councilmember Faust asked if there existed a national standard where odor and
3 acceptability rate are concerned.. McGinley stated that there does not exist a
4 national standard where odor is concerned.
5
6 Mayor Hodson suggested that the City of St. Anthony hold a 98%acceptability
7 standard. McGinley stated that 95%was much more reasonable.
8
9 Councilmember Faust stated that a couple of City employees would need to be
10 trained by the Metropolitan Council, if they chose to take the route of an
11 acceptability standard.
12
13. Mayor Hodson stated that he felt that the criteria existed from which to create
14 guidelines for a conditional use permit.
15
16 McGinley stated that there would need to be some sort of time period where the
17 manufacturer had the opportunity to demonstrate compliance.
18
19 Morrison stated that he felt that it would be very difficult to police the issue
20 regarding the 95%acceptability standard.
21
22 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he,too, felt that the 95% acceptability
23 standard would be too difficult to enforce.
24
25 Councilmember Sparks suggested that, instead of the 95% standard,they count
26 the number of phone-calls that they receive from residents.
27
28 Resident Doug Tanner came forward and stated the smell is present, and
29 offensive. He stated that he was very disappointed with the 120-day test period
30 for a couple of reasons. He noted that it is wintertime and windows are closed.
31 He asked if, after 120 days, the smell is not gone and there is still an odor,that
32 Essenco is forced to fix the problem, or not granted a permit.
33
34 Solie stated that the 120-day period was simply not enough time to discover a
35 problem, fix the problem, and continue operating to see that the problem is indeed
36 fixed. He added that a time-line was not the best way to handle the situation. He
37 suggested that they be able to operate with a conditional use permit, and fix
38 problems as they arise.
39
40 Councilmember Thuesen asked for Gilligan's opinion on the subject. Gilligan
41 stated that he thought it would be very difficult to determine satisfactory progress
42 without a timeline. Gilligan continued that they could establish some objective
43 standards, such as the specific equipment that would be installed, by which to
44 measure progress.
45
7
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 7
1 Tanner stated that he did not feel that the words"good faith"were appropriate
2 where Essenco was concerned, highlighting the fact that they were up and
3 running before they had a permit at all.
4
5 Steve Levitus, owner of Essenco, came forward and stated that the early start-up
6 was a genuine misunderstanding on their behalf. He added that they have not
7 been operating for several weeks, and stated that he was completely committed to
8 working with the community.
9
10 Mayor Hodson asked City staff if there was enough information for them to draft
11 an ordinance at this time, in order to give Essenco the ability to begin operations
12 again.
13
14 Gilligan stated that it was difficult to do. He suggested that they set a time limit,
15 after which they could pull the conditional use if requirements of the permit were
16 not met.
17
18 After much discussion, the Council decided to draft a revised version of the
19 conditional use permit that the Planning Commission recommended. They
20 decided that they would grant the permit based on a trial period that expires on
21 September-1, 2002.
22
23 Councilmember Sparks was in disagreement with the length of time, feeling that
24 it was far too long.
25
26 Solie stated that they could not appropriately respond to the requirements of a
27 conditional use permit based on a 6-month trial period. He added that, if that
28 were the case, they would simply revoke their request tonight.
29
30 Resident Jennifer Tanner stated that her greatest concern was over what was
31 being done in"good faith"at this time to remedy the identified odor problem.
32
33 Mayor Hodson clarified that the Council would only grant the permit through
34 September 1, 2002.
35
36 Solie and Levitus indicated that the September 1, 2002 deadline was simply not
37 long enough for them. Gilligan suggested that the Council went forth with a
38 motion, and that Essenco determine what they will do once the motion has been
39 made.
40
41 Motion by Councilmember Faust to grant the conditional use permit for Village
42 North, LLP, 280137"Avenue Northeast with the following conditions:
43 • Candle manufacturing can only occur between the hours of 6:00 a.m.
44 through 4:00 p.m.,Monday through Saturday.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 8
1 • The operation can operate until September 1, 2002 after which the
2 Planning Commission would hold a public hearing to determine whether,
3 or not,there exist problems associated with the smell. .
4 • Conditional use permit may be revoked if findings on September 1, 2002
5 indicated that the odor is injurious to the public health, and welfare,
6 including property values of the surrounding neighbors.
7 o After September 1, 2002, the City reserved the right to place any
8 additional,reasonable conditions on the use.
9
10 Motion carried 4-1. Councilmember Sparks opposed.
11
12 Levitus confirmed that the decision tonight meant that they were able to begin
13 operations again. Mayor Hodson stated that was true.
14
15 It was determined that residents would call the Assistant City Manager Susan
16 Henry at(612) 706-1324 to formally register complaints.
17
18 A. Ordinance 2002-001, re: Requires business licenses for massage therapy business
19 (first reading).-
20
21 Commissioner Steeves reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission. He
22 stated that they recommended it for approval as is.
23
24 Councilmember Horst asked about the associated fees.
25
26 Resident Mary Luger-Sarter reviewed the costs associated with starting out in the
27 business of massage therapy, which were far less than the $5,000 of capital
28 investment noted in the ordinance.
29
30 Councilmember Sparks stated that she felt they could drop the $5,000 fee
31 altogether. The Council agreed.
32
33 Luger-Sarter commented on the $500 investigating fee. Gilligan stated that it was
34 a one-time fee, but the $250 licensing fee was annual.
35
36 Luger-Sarter stated that the wording"massage parlors"was very offensive and
37 suggested that it be changed to therapeutic massage businesses.
38
39 The Council agreed that the language of the ordinance be changed to include both
40 therapeutic massage parlors and therapeutic massage businesses.
41
42 Arlene Fernandez, owner and manager at The Center for Stress Reduction in St.
43 Anthony,came forward to express a few opinions regarding the ordinance. She
44 stated that she did not think that proposed ordinance would work because those
9
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 9
1 individuals who run massage parlors manage to find loopholes and have a lot of
2 legal backing.
3
4 Fernandez continued by saying that it will discourage new businesses, as well as
5 existing businesses from continuing. She added that, at the last meeting, it was
6 stated that money was not the issue. Therefore, she suggested that the licensing
7 fee be $75.
8
9 Fernandez suggested that the hours of business be changed to say that clients not
10 be allowed on the premises when business hours are not in effect. She concluded
1 1 by identifying some of the obvious ways to determine if an establishment is
12 running a massage parlor, or a massage business.
13
14 Councilmember Horst stated that Fernandez made some good points.
15
16 Mayor Hodson suggested that they strike"persons"under subdivision 575.12. He
17 also stated that they would strike the $5,000 fee from the ordinance, but keep the
18 $250 license fee and the $500 investigation fee at this time.
19
20 The Council made the-following adjustments to the ordinance:
21 • Subd.575.12: "persons"to be changed to"customers".
22 • Striking of$5,000 capital investment fee.
23
24 It was decided that City staff would determine the actual cost of the licensing and
25 investigation fees next year.
26
27 Motion by Councilmember Faust to approve Ordinance 2002-001, re: Requires
28 business licenses for therapeutic massage parlors (Is'reading) and amend Zoning
29 Ordinance Section 3.1635.02.
30
31 Motion carried unanimously.
32
33' 5. Flood Improvement Project Funding update. Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Inc.
34 will be present.
35 A. Resolution 02-012, re: Call hearing on 2002 street/utility improvements.
36 Todd Hubmer stated that he was present to provide the Council with an update on
37 the status of funding for storm water improvement projects within the City of St.
38 Anthony.
39
40 Hubmer stated that the low bidder for the project came in at$1,929,000. He
41 stated that the Engineer's Estimate was $1,980,000.
42
43 Hubmer reviewed the changes that were made to the project and the increase in
44 cost. He stated that the project was currently in litigation over extra costs
45 incurred by the contractor in working around, or with, Qwest and Minnegasco
10
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 8, 2002
Page 10
1 utilities. He concluded that the exact dollar amount would not be known until
2 later this year, and that it could either increase, or decrease the cost of the project.
3
4 Hubmer stated that he would be meeting with the DNR next week to go over land
5 acquisition costs.
6
7 Councilmember Sparks asked if it was standard procedure to continue the project
8 with a$140,000 deficit. Morrison stated that the good news was that they thought
9 they would have a$900,000 deficit. He added that they may delay the park
10 warming house project in order to complete the street improvements until the
11 bonding issue completed it's cycle, or they came up with other revenue to finish
12 the project.
13
14 Councilmember Sparks stated that she was not in favor of stopping the process of
15 the warming house.
16
17 Mayor Hodson agreed with Councilmember Sparks that they could not postpone
18 the warming house.
19
20 Councilmember Faust stated that he was confident.that they would be able to get
21 the additional funding needed.
22
23 Motion by Mayor Hodson to approve Resolution 02-012, re: Calling a hearing on
24 2002 street/utility improvements.
25
26 Motion carried unanimously.
27
28 B. Resolution 02-013, re: Declare cost.to be assessed and order preparation of
29 proposed assessment.
30
31 Motion by Councilmember Horst to approve Resolution 02-013,re: Declare cost
32 to be assessed and order preparation of proposed assessment.
33
34 Motion carried unanimously.
35
36 C. Resolution 02-014, re: Call hearing on proposed assessment for 2002 street/utility
37 improvements.
38
39 Motion by Councilmember Horst to approve Resolution 02-014, re: Call hearing
40 on proposed assessment for 2002 street/utility improvements.
41
42 Motion carried unanimously.
43
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
11
January 8, 2002
Page 11
1 Hubmer stated that they would be holding a public information meeting for
2 residents that are involved in the.2002 street project on January 23, 2002 at 7:00
3 p.m. in Council Chambers.
4
5 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
6 Mayor Hodson requested a motion on the 2002 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization dates.
7
8 Motion by Councilmember Faust to hold the 2002 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
9 Meeting on April 9,2002.
10
11 Motion carried unanimously.
12
13 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
14 Mornson reviewed the Open House for Apache Plaza redevelopment on Thursday, January 24,
15 2002.
16
17 Mornson stated there was a meting with U.S. Bank today to update them on the schedule for
18 Apache Plaza.
19
20 Mornson stated that a meeting has been scheduled with Falcon Heights and Lauderdale to
21 introduce Mayor Hodson and discuss next two-year contract.
22
23 Mornson stated that a joint meeting with the School Board was scheduled for Tuesday, January
24 29, 2002.
25
26 Mornson stated that the Legislative Conference was on Friday, February 1, 2002.
27
28 Mornson stated that the Employee Recognition Lunch was scheduled for Thursday, March 14,
29 2002.
30
31 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
32 Mayor Hodson stated that he met with the SRF Consulting fmn,who deals with transportation
33 evaluations. He added that one of the things that he would like to include in.the annual City
34 Council goal-setting retreat was the transportation component to the development that they will
35 have at Apache.
36
37 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
38 None.
39
40 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
41 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adjourn the meeting at 9:52 p.m.
42
43 Motion carried unanimously.
44
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
�a
January 8, 2002
Page 12
1
2
3 Respectfully submitted;
4
5
6 Courtney Y
urt a Seesz
7 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
8
9
10
11 Mayor
12
13
14
15 ATTEST:
16 City Clerk
17
18
13
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: January 22, 2002 Approval:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
Heatinp,License:
M&D Plumbing and Heating Inc., St. Michael, MN
Master Gas Fitters Inc., No. St. Paul,MN
Modern Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc., Minneapolis, MN
General Contractors License:
Tri —Art Inc., St. Paul,MN
14
---BRC--FINANCIAL_-SYSTEM - - -------- -------ST.--ANTHONY--VILL
01/1.5/2002 13: Check: Register GL540R-V06.40 PAGE
------HANK----- VENDOR------- - - CHECKS#----DATE-- AMOUhIT--.-
FIRS BREMER .BANK NA
008712 ADVANCED GRAPHIX , INC . 16723 01/23/02 389.83
008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 16724 01/23/02 580.00
------- -----008450-----ANIMAL_CONT-ROL_-SERVICES,---- 16725--01/23/Or._--------------77-.00---
008863 ANTILLA/RYAN 16726 01/23/02 165.00
005175 ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPAL 16727 01/23/02 2,770 .00
- -------------00851.1.....__.-AT---B,--T'--WIRELESS-------- ---------------16728-01-/23/02 --- ---..._- --- 82.73
004271 AT&T BROADBAND 16729 01/23/02 4.66
- 008864 BASARA/JOE 16730 01/23102 165.00
--- --008865 -------BOGIE_/-ALEX----- -- ---------1-6731--01!-23/02- ------------165.00
-- 000430 BRIGHTON AUTO ELECTRIC 16732 01/23/02 46.35
005136 BRISKI/TIM 16733 01/23/02 500 .00
-- ------- 008201------CARDINAL,/KEVIN------------_-_A6734-01-/23/02---- ------- ------165.00 .
000610 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANS SVC 16735 01/23/02 8 .97
008234 CH RISTMAN, JACK 16736 01/23/02 500.00
..000660-------C-ITY--OF--COLUMBIA -HEIGHTS---------- -16737.01J23/02.........294.04 -
.00008 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 16738 01/23/02 333.50
008577 CITY OF ST. PAUL 16739 01 /23/02 157 .26
_._ ._.. ... __004107-_-- -COMPTON 'S- COMMERCIAL -CLN -------.-- --16740 01/23/02 - - - . .4. 169.48 --
008109 CORNER HOUSE= 16741 01/23/02 806 .00
000815 COTRONEO/DOMINIC 16742 01/23/02 595.08
._16743 .01/23/02..__-----• - 1.482.10 -
008151 DIEGNAU/DANIEL 16744 01/23/02 500.00
007371 DISCOUNT STEEL, INC . 16745 01/23/02 9 .32
.008417 - .. ....._DNR -WATERS.- - --- - -- -- - - 16746.01/23/02 ... .. 1 .417.64
008338 DOKKF_N/MARK 16747 01/23/02 500 .00
001411 DON HARSTAD CO. , INC . 16748 01/23/02 580.71
008742 DONALD--SALVERDA.WASSOGI----------- .-16749-01/2 3/02--- -,--- .. . 37 .61
000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 16750 01/23/02 10,929.70
008634 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICE 16751 01/23/02 12. 50
.005122 ... .DRUSCH/DONALD -----..-_. -...._ _ .. 16752 .01/23/02 __. .._. . 350.00
000860 ENGSTROM/RICHARD 16753 01/23/02 550 .00
008618 EVENSON/TIM 16754 01/23/02 165.00
- -- - - 0087.22 ._ ---FEIST/CHRIS - - --- -- - - - - ___l 6755.01 123/02 ---. . .._ 165.00- .
008647 FRATTALL.ONE 'S HARDWARE 16756 01/23/02 217.32
008866 FREDERICK/ERICK 16757 01/23/02 165. 00
008238... ._._.FULLER/.CHRIS .._._. .. __... .... .--___. __. _ _ -. --16758.01/23/02 350.00
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 16759 01/23/02 414.52
008816 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY-MI 16760 01/23/02 13.75
001145, _ ..__.__GLENWOOD__INGLEWOOD --.. -. - 16761 01/23/02 . 62.60
001300 HACH COMPANY 16762 01/23/02 155.52
008191 HALET/JEFFREY 16763 01 /23/02 165.00
005139 _. HALL/MONROE ... _-_. .. .. . ._ 16764 01/23/02 165.00
005121 HARTMAN/JA`{ 16765 01/23/02 26.52
008376 HENNEPIN CNTY SHERIFF 'S 16766 01/23/02 8, 846.51'
005017 . HENNEPIN COUNTY TRE=ASURE _.. 16767. 01/23/02 429.00
008472 HESS/SHANE 16768 01/23!02 500.00
006699 HEWITT/-JOEL 16769 01/23/02 350 .00
008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 16770 01/23/02 27.21
15 .
BRC--FI-NANCIAI_-SYSTEM ----- ----- -- -- ST- ANTHONY--VIL.L
01/15/2002 13: Check: Register GL540R-VO6. 40 PAGE
' BANK VENDOR - ---CHF_CK#-DATE -- AMOUNT----_
-- FIRS BREME:R BANK NA
008239 HOSKA/JIM 16771 01/23/02 165.00
008630 HUDDLE/MICHAEL 16772 01/23/02 500.00
---.--.-------008209-----HUGHES/.M:GCHAEL - 1.677-3-0-1-/-23/02---------16_..00----
005128 HUGILL./KENNETH 16774 01/23/02 165.00
008442 JOHNSON/DAN 16775 01/23/02 500.00
= ------- ---007352------..KATH -FUEL-OIL--SERVICE---------- -----167-76 -01/23/02----------- ---
000742 KROEPLIN/CONNIE 16777 01/23/02 5. 18
008160 LEBENS/MARK 16778 01/23/02 500.00
-----------002040.._ LILL-IE-SUEiURBAN-NEWSPAPE-----------16779--0-1-/.2 3_/02-----------270.07------
-- 008229 L.OFFLER BUSINESS SYS"fEMS 16780 01/23/02 109.84
005135 LUNDEEN/RICHARD 16781 01/23/02 165.00
--- -----008855-----MACRO--GROUP-,_INC.,- --- -- 16782--01-/23/02---- - ---760.00- - --
002125 MALENICK/JOHN 16783 01/23/02 350.00
008226 MANGSETH/JON 16784 01/23/02 500.00
_.---.------ ---007348 ------MC_-COLL-ISTER-&---COMPANY------------16785-01-/2 3/-02----- ------ 807-.09--------
008723 MCCLANIAHAN/KELLY 16786 01/23/02 165.00
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC . TEC 16787 01/23/02 1 ,979.22
- 007835- --METROCALL- 16788 .01/23/02 ._._... _-509,75.___
005010 MINN CONWAY FIRE= u SAFET 1678901/23/02 30 .70
008269 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 16790 01/23/02 ' 54.95
--- .. . . - 008280--- -- -MINNESOTA _STATE_TRE=ASURE---- ----- -----1'6791-01/2 3/02 ..-- - - 492 .95 -
008074 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGE 16792 01/23/02 32.00
008720 MOORS/DALE 16793 01/23/02 500 .00
._008A-09 -- ----MOSBY/MARK__.-----..._..----.---..__..-----.-.__ ...__-- .- --16794 01/23/02 -. . - -500.00
.00004 MPELRA 16795 01/23/02 80 .00
008724 NISELL./ERIK 16796 01/23/02 165.00
008761 NRG -PROCESSING -SOLUTIONS---_------ -----16797--01/23/02--------- - - _ --449 .50
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 16798 01/23/02 23. 13
005168 OHL/JOHN 16799 01/23/02 550.00
.00005 OLMSTEAD CO.--SHERIFF '-S . _ -- 16800 01/23/02 -- - - 80.00
005123 OLSON/JAY 16801 01/23/02 350.00
008528 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES 16802 01/23/02 285.00
- - 007366 --- -PARTS -MIDWEST, -IN( .-------- ---- ----16803 -01/21x,/02------- -- 68. 12 .. -
002860 PFEIFFER/RICHARD 16804 01/23/02 386.9ti-
.00002 PIONEER RESEARCH CORP. 16805 01/23/02 347 .08
- 00827-4-._..- ._-PITNEY-BOWES, ---INC ...-- --------_-----__..--------..-16806-01/23/.02 .-.. _..._ . __...1.86.90 -
.00007 PLEAA 16807 01/23/02 5.00
008369 POSTMASTER 16808 01/23/02 125.00
_00707_..----- -PRAXAIR------------ -----_----- -------- ---- ---
2 c: . 14. .
004492 GWEST 16810 01/23/02 229.98
008372 OWEST INTEPRISE AMERICA, 16811 01/23/02 49 .95
008867 - --. RABINE/ROD _ . .....- -..16812 01/23/02 165.00
008462 RAMSEY COUNTY 16813 01/23/02 6,031 .06
.00006 RAMSEY COUNTY CHIEFS OF 16814 01/23/02 20.00
002380 RELIANT- ENERGY--MINNEGASC -. _ 16815 01/23/02 - - 3,478.52
000788 RIGNELL/DANIEL 16816 01/23!02 165.00
005270 ROSEVILLE RADIO 16317 01/23/02 120 .93
005131 SCHMITZ/DIRK 16818 01/23/02 165.00
16
'- ------BRC-FINANCIAL-SYSTEM ----- - --- -ST.--ANTH0klY--VIL
01/15/2002 13: Check Register GL540R-VO6.40 PAGE
--BANK -VENDOR -----CHEC K#--DATE AMC1UNT-- -
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
007155 SCHOLL/JEFFREY M 16819 01/23/02 5_>0.00
008839 SECOND NATURE LAWN AND 16820 01/23/02 15,805. 15
----------008008---SF=I- - -----1 682 1-0 1-/-2 3/-0%'..------ ---17`-=x.86 _.
003355 SILVER LAKE CLINIC 16822 01/23/02 174.00
= 008725 SITARZ/MARK 16823 01/23/02 350.00
------0082 1 4---_-SNY-DER-DRUG---- --------------- -16824-0i.-/23/02--- ---- - ---6. 1. 1. ---
008344 SPIESS/JEFF 16825 01/23/02 500 .00
008345 SROGA/JEREMY 16826 01/23/02 500.00
-----------0087-1-9-----.--S-TANLEY-/-HF_I.DI-- -- -------1.68?_7-01-/L 3/02_'.-----_------500.00.__008846 STAN 70N GROUP 16828 01/23/02 217.02
- 002420 STAR TRIBUNE 16829 01./23/02 367 .20
-'---------..003490.----STRE-ICHER•'S------- --- ----16830 --0.1./23/_02-----------152.75 --
= 008620 SUNDE/TRF=SSA 16831 01/23/02 500.00
008608 SURVIVAL.INK 16832 01/23/02 220.95
-------------005126-------SWANSON!SCOTT -----------.16833---O,i.-/2 3/-O -------.._____16 ,.00
003260 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 16834 01/23/02 49. 52
008700 TC WEB TECH 16835 01/23/02 55`_'>.00
_ .008755--- ---THE-410RILE-PFIONE-CUMFAN`(----------------16836
007337 TIMESAVER OF=F SITE SECRE . 16837 01/23/02 225.00
.00003 TOUSLEY FORD-Y, INC . 16838 01/23/02' 49.05
_.003560-- -- --TRACY--PRINTING ---- ..__-------------:---1 6839 -0 1-/c'3/02----------------- 568.60 - -
007330 TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC. 16840 01/23/02 17.51.
008695 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT AN 16841 01/23/02 , 72 . 42.
004481 -----TWIN.-CITY--JANITOR--SUPPLY __.__._ - 1684.2 01/23/02-.--_- ----. . ._- 60.2:;
008336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 16843 01/23/02 2r>3 .5•4
008561 UNITED RENTALS COMPANY 16844 01/23/02 44.88
008443 ._...- --UNIVERSITY---OF--MINNESOTA--- - -----------16845 -01-/2 3/02-_._.-.-..- ------- 192.00
008862 US RANK 1.6846 01./23/02 468,921 .88
008858 VEIT & COMPANY 16847 01/23/02 145,418 .31
008227 ...___-VERIZON WIRELESS, _-BELLEV--=.---. .. _-1684.8 -01/23/02 ----- ---. ..573. 17.-
008868 VICK/ANDY 16849 01/23/02 16=.00
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 16650 01/23/02 260.77
..00001 -_.--- WINGFOOT-COMMERCIAL.-T-IRF=-.------- ---16851---01/-23/02- ---.__...__-...620. 1�+ --
008273 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC . 16852. 01/23/02 51 ,115.65
007154 WYCHOR II/JAMES J 16853 01/23/02 500 .00
003820--.-__ .._ZAHL -EQUIPMENT...COMPANY---------.._..._....._.__. -16854_0.1/23/02 11 . 13
BREMER BANK NA 752, 197.51
17
BRC --FINANCIAL -SYSTEM -------------------- - - - --- ST. ANTHOPIY VILLA
01/16/2002 10: Check: Register GL540R-VO6.40 PAGE
---FiANK- --------.._..-VENDOR - --------- -------- CHECK# DATE-
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008216 . A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 20256 01/23/02 28 .08.
008311 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRI 20257 01/23/02 1 ,203.93
008621- ---- ----ALLIANCE MECHANICAL-----------. - -----20258 01-/F.3/02 - - - 375.00
004225 ALL.IANT FOODSERVICE 20259 01/23/02 2,433.57
004030 ASCAP 20260 01/23/02 729 .60
_.. ..... 008692.. AT&T -BROADBAND --- ----- --- -- - 20261 01/23/02- _ 151 .29 -
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 20262 01/23/02 1 ,822 .58
008827 BLACKEY 'S BAKERY 20263 01/23/02 .45.09
004107- COMPTON?S-COMMERC-IAL_CLN--------------- 20264 --01/2 3/02- -2,445.95...... . .
008736 CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT 20265 01/23/02 380.96
008557 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 20266 01/23/02 36 .71.
-- - 008437 - --_DIRE:CTV ---- - - - - -- -- _-__.-. _ 20267- 01/23/02 -- -37.22
004120 EAGLE WINE_ CO 20268 01/23/02 2, 182 . 16
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 20269 01/23/02 15,862.80
004130 ECOL_AB --- 20270 01/23/02. ... ._. 149.05
008697 EXTREME BEVERAGE 20271 01/23/02 64.00
004157 GETTMAN HOWIE, INC . 20272 01/23/02 205 . 60
001180 GOODIN COMPANY --- 202.73 01/23/02 - 87.47
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 20274 01/23/02 20,915 :50
004201 HEGGIES PIZZA 20275 01/23/02 288.55
004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 20276 01/23/02 29, 145.80 .
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 20277 01/23/02 1 ,008.50
008263 MCLEOI) USA, INC . TEC 20278 01/23/02 678 .09
008671 MENGELKOCH CO. - - - 20279 01/23/02 20.00
004299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO. 2028,0 01/23/02 10 .56
004334 NORTHEASTER 20281 01/23/02 186. 1.5
004339 NTN COMMUNICATIONS INC 20282 01/23/02 480.00
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 20283 01/23/02 26. 16
004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 20284 01/23/02 2,587 .50
004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 20285 01/23/02 21 ,955.32
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 20286 01/23/02 48.95
008770 PORTER/WILL.IAM 20287 01/23/02 67.00
004376 - PRIOR WINE- CO -- - ------------- -- ' - 20288- 01/23/02 - - 3,063.83
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 20289 01/23/02 18,200.05
008219- QWEST DEX 20290 01/23/02 474.45
008701 REGISTER TAPE NETWORK. 20291 01/23/02 500.00
002380 RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC 20292 01/23/02 1 ,933 .00
.00001 SESAC INC 20293 01/23/02 266.40
008846 STANTON GROUP_ -- - 20294 01/23/02 91 .98
00ti•4-68 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 20295 01/23/02 416.37
004480 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE 20296 01 /23/02 117 .70
008316 WINE COMPANY/THE 20297 01/23/02 1 ,835.97
002680 XCEL ENERGY 20298 01/23/02 3,219 .82
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 135,778 .71
l8
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02-018
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MUTUAL AID
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony finds that there are situations where another
local government may need the assistance of our local government's personnel and/or
equipment and it would be impractical or impossible for the City Council of St. Anthony
to convene to authorize sending such assistance.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony that:
It authorizes the Fire Chief or his designee to designee to dispatch equipment and personnel as deemed
necessary to assist another local government. This decision shall be made after considering at all times
and in each case the internal needs of our local government in addition to the needs of the party
requesting our local government's assistance.
This action shall be considered to be an official act of the local government and all of the local
government's policies regarding compensation; use of equipment, insurance, etc. will apply.
The Fire Chief or his designee shall recall the local government's equipment ad personnel if it is needed
in our community, or if it is no longer needed by the requesting local government or if the City Council
of St. Anthony orders that action.
Adopted this day of 92002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
TO: MICHAEL J.MORNSON CITY MANAGER
FROM: JOEL A.HEWITT FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: STATE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
DATE: 12/27/01
CC:
BACKGROUND
In 2000,the Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association appointed a committee to develop a state wide
mutual aid system.This system is to provide a process to request and receive needed resources to a
fire department to assist in mitigating incidents,which are beyond the capacity of a department's
availability to assemble the needed resources to resolve to the end of a particular large or complex
incident.This concept was a direct result of the St. Peter Tornado in 1989 and the Carlos Avery fire
last year,each incident required resources that expanded past each communities mutual aid
arrangements.It also makes sense at this time with the new threats in mitigating Bio/ chemical or
WMD incidents that now face a communities fire service.Which will require regional or across state
resources which now are not included in mutual aid agreements.This system will alleviate any
resource issues associated with the boundaries of such agreements. Currently,the St.Anthony Fire
Department is a participating member of two local mutual aid associations,the first is the North
Suburban Mutual Aid Association that provides the resources of thirty fire departments and the
second is the Capital City Mutual Aid Association providing resources of twenty-six departments.
The attached resolution once approved will allow us to request resources from the Minnesota State
Duty Officer,who will have the availability to request resources from fire departments who
participate in the program. By approving this resolution will place our department on the list of
resources the Duty Officer may have the availability to call upon.The Fire Chief or their.Designee
may deny the request or recall resources dispatched to mutual aid at any time in order to maintain
protection to their community.
By participating in this program will provide the Fire Department the optimum in resources to
protect our citizenry against any emergency the Fire Department may be called upon to resolve.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council of St.Anthony is requested to approve the attached resolution,allowing our
department to participate in the Minnesota State Mutual Aid system.
20
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02 -019
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE ASSESSMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ST. ANTHONY AND HENNEPIN COUNTY
WHEREAS, the St. Anthony City Council desires Hennepin County to perform certain assessments
on behalf of the City; and
WHEREAS, the County is willing to cooperate with the City by completing the assessments in a
proper manner.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Assessment Agreement between the City and
Hennepin County, covering the years 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006, and in the approximate amount of
$35,600 per year.
Adopted this day of , 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
21
Contract No. A00142
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as
the "COUNTY", and the CITY OF ST. ANTHONY, a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "CITY";
WHEREAS, said CITY lies partially within the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN and
constitutes a separate assessment district; and
WHEREAS, under such circumstances, the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.072 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 permit the County Assessor
to provide for the assessment of property; and
WHEREAS, said CITY desires the COUNTY to perform certain assessments
on behalf of said CITY; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to cooperate with said CITY by completing
the assessment in a proper manner;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein, it is agreed as follows:
1. The COUNTY shall perform the 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 property
assessment for the CITY OF ST. ANTHONY in accordance with property assessment
procedures and practices established and observed by the COUNTY, the validity and
reasonableness of which are hereby acknowledged and approved by the CITY. Any
such practices and procedures may be changed from time to time, by the COUNTY in
its sole judgment, when good and efficient assessment procedures so require. The
22
property assessment by the COUNTY shall be composed of those assessment services
which are set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this
reference, provided that the time frames set forth therein shall be considered to be
approximate only.
2. All information, records, data, reports, etc. necessary to allow the
COUNTY to carry out its herein responsibilities shall be furnished to the COUNTY
without charge by the CITY, and the CITY agrees to cooperate in good faith with the
COUNTY in carrying out the work under this Agreement.
3. The CITY agrees to furnish, without charge, office space needed by the
COUNTY at appropriate places in the CITY's offices. The keys thereto shall be
provided to the COUNTY. The CITY assures that such areas shall not be unattended,
during or after work of any kind by or on behalf of the CITY, in-any area occupied by the
COUNTY as provided herein, or if unattended, the CITY shall make certain that such
areas are locked and secured. Such office space shall be sufficient in size to
accommodate reasonably two (2) appraisers and any furniture placed therein. The
office space shall be available for the COUNTY's use at any and all times during the
CITY's business hours, and during all such hours the COUNTY shall be provided with
levels of heat, air conditioning and ventilation as are appropriate for the seasons.
4. The CITY also agrees to provide appropriate desk and office furniture as
necessary, clerical and secretarial support necessary and reasonable for the carrying
out of the work herein, necessary office supplies and equipment, copying machines and
fax machines and their respective supplies, and telephone service to the COUNTY, all
without charge to the COUNTY.
(2)
23
5. It shall be the responsibility of the CITY to have available at the CITY's
offices each CITY working day a person who has the knowledge and skill to be able to
answer routine questions pertaining to homesteads and property assessment matters
and to receive, evaluate and organize homestead applications. It shall also be the
responsibility of the CITY to promptly refer any homestead application which needs
investigation to the COUNTY.
6. In accordance with Hennepin County Affirmative Action Policy and the
County Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall be excluded
from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service or
activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status,
sexual orientation, public assistance status, ex-offender status or national origin; and no
person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws,.rules and regulations
against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination.
7. It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be
construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of joint venturers or
co-partners between the parties hereto or as constituting the CITY as the agent,
representative or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose or in any manner
whatsoever. Any and all personnel of.CITY or other persons, while engaged in the"
performance of any activity under this Agreement, shall have no contractual relationship
with the COUNTY and shall not be considered employees of the COUNTY and any and
all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of
Minnesota on behalf of said personnel or other persons while so engaged, and any and
all claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of
(3)
24
employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims of
discrimination against the CITY, its officers, agents, CITY or employees shall in no way
be the responsibility of the COUNTY, and CITY shall defend, indemnify and hold the
COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, employees and duly authorized volunteers
harmless from any and all such claims regardless of any determination of any pertinent
tribunal, agency, board, commission or court. Such personnel or other persons shall
not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind
whatsoever from the COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and
hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Re-employment
Compensation, disability, severance pay and retirement benefits.
8. CITY agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the COUNTY, its
elected officials, officers, agents, employees and duly authorized volunteers harmless
from any and all liability (statutory or otherwise) claims, suits, damages, judgments,
interest, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees, witness fees and
disbursements incurred in the defense thereof) resulting form or caused by any act or
omission of the CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, employees or duly authorized
volunteers in the performance of the responsibilities provided by this Agreement.
9. The COUNTY shall endeavor to perform all services called for herein in
an efficient manner. The sole and exclusive remedy for any breach of this Agreement
by the COUNTY and for COUNTY's liability of any kind whatsoever, including but not
limited to liability arising out of, resulting from or in any manner related to contract, tort,
warranty, statute or otherwise, shall be limited to correcting diligently any deficiency in
said services as is reasonably possible under the pertinent circumstances.
(4)
25
10. Neither party hereto shall be deemed to be in default of any provision of
this Agreement, or for delay or failure in performance, resulting from causes beyond the
reasonable control of such party, which causes shall include, but are not limited to, acts
of God, labor disputes, acts of civil or military authority, fire, civil disturbance, changes
in laws, ordinances or regulations which materially affect the provisions hereof, or any
other causes beyond the parties' reasonable control.
11 This Agreement shall commence on August 1, 2002, and shall terminate
on July 31, 2006. Either party may initiate an extension of this Agreement for a term of
four (4) years by giving the other written notice of its intent to so extend no less
than 150 days prior to the termination of this Agreement. If the party who receives said
notice of intent to extend gives written notice to the other party of its desire not to
extend within 110 days prior to termination of this Agreement, this Agreement shall
terminate on July 31, 2006.
Nothing herein shall preclude the parties, prior to the end of this Agreement, from
agreeing to extend this contract for a term of four (4) years. Any extended term hereof shall
be on the same terms and conditions set forth herein and shall commence on August 1, 2006.
Either party may terminate this Agreement for "just cause" as determined by the
Commissioner of Revenue after hearing for such a determination is held by the Commissioner
of Revenue and which has been attended by representatives of COUNTY and CITY or which
said representatives had a reasonable opportunity to attend, provided that after such
determination, any part desiring to cancel this Agreement may do so by giving the other party
no less than 120 days' written notice. If the CITY should cancel this Agreement, as above
provided, before the completion of the then current property assessment by the COUNTY, the
(5)
26 -
CITY agrees to defend and hold the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, employees and
duly authorized volunteers harmless from any liability that might ensue as a result of the non-
completion of a property tax assessment.
For the purpose of this Agreement, the term "just cause" shall mean the failure
of any party hereto reasonably to perform a material.responsibility arising hereunder.
12A. In consideration of said assessment services, the CITY agrees to pay the
COUNTY the sum of Thirty-five Thousand six Hundred Dollars ($35,600) for each
assessment, provided that any payment for the current year's assessment may be
increased or decreased by that amount which exceeds or is less than the COUNTY's
estimated cost of appraising new construction and new parcels for the current year's
assessment. The amount of any increase or decrease shall be specified in the billing
for the current year's assessment.
Any bill from the COUNTY for the current year's assessment which is received
by the CITY before August 18 of the current year shall be due on September 7 of said
year, provided that the CITY may elect to pay said bill before said date. Any said bill
received by the CITY after August 18 shall be due no later than twenty-one (21) days
after the CITY's receipt thereof.
12B. Regarding each assessment, in addition to being subject to adjustment
in the above manner, said assessment cost of $35,600.00 may also be increased by
the COUNTY if:
(1) The COUNTY determines that any cost to the COUNTY in carrying
out any aspect of this Agreement has increased, including but not
limited to the following types of costs: new construction and new
parcel appraisals, gasoline, postage, supplies, labor (including
fringe benefits) and other types of costs, whether similar or
dissimilar; and/or
(6)
27
2) The COUNTY reasonably determines that other costs should be
included in the costs of assessment work.
If the COUNTY desires to increase the assessment cost pursuant to this
paragraph 12(b), it shall give written notice thereof by June 15 of any year and such increase
shall apply to the assessment for the calendar year next following the current calendar year.
Any such notification shall specifically set forth the amount of any new construction and new
parcel appraisal charges. Notwithstanding any provisions herein to the contrary, if any such
increase, exclusive of any charge for the estimated costs of new construction and new parcel
appraisals, exceeds ten (10%) percent of the amount charged for the assessment for the
then current calendar year, exclusive of any charge for the estimated costs of new
construction and new parcel appraisals, the CITY may cancel this Agreement by giving to the
COUNTY written notice thereof, provided that said cancellation notice must be received by
the COUNTY not later than July 24 of the then current calendar year and said cancellation
shall be effective no earlier than five (5) days after the receipt of said notice by the COUNTY
and not later than July 31 of said current calendar year. Supportive records of the cost
increase will be open to inspection by the CITY at such times as are mutually agreed upon
by the COUNTY and CITY.
Failure of the COUNTY to give the CITY a price-change notice by June 15
shall not preclude the COUNTY from giving CITY such notice after said date but prior to
September 1 of any year, provided that if such price increase exceeds said ten (10%) -
all as above set forth - the CITY may cancel this Agreement if the COUNTY receives
notice thereof not later than thirty-nine (39) days from the date of receipt by the CITY of
any said late price-change notice, provided further that any such cancellation shall be
effective not earlier than five (5) days after COUNTY's receipt of said cancellation
(7)
28
notice-and not later than forty-six (46) days after the CITY's receipt of any said price-
increase notice.
Payment by the CITY shall be due no later than twenty-one (21) days after
receipt by the CITY of billing from the COUNTY for the herein assessment services,
provided that said payment shall be due no earlier than September 7 of each year.
13. Any notice or demand, which may or must be given or made by a party
hereto, under the terms of this Agreement or any statute or ordinance, shall be in
writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail to the other party addressed as
follows:
TO CITY: Mayor, City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
TO COUNTY: Hennepin County Administrator
2300A Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487
copies to: County Assessor
Hennepin County
2103A Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Assistant County Assessor
Hennepin County
2103A Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Any party may designate a different.addressee or address at any time by giving
written notice thereof as above provided. Any notice, if mailed, properly addressed,
postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, shall be deemed dispatched on the
registered date or that stamped on the certified mail receipt and shall be deemed
received within the second business day thereafter or when it is actually received,
whichever is sooner. Any notice delivered by hand shall be deemed received upon
actual delivery.
(8)
29
14. It is expressly understood that the obligations of the CITY under
Paragraphs 7, 8, 11, and 12 hereof and the obligations of the CITY which, by their
sense and context, are intended to survive the performance thereof by the CITY, shall
so survive the completion of performance, termination or cancellation of this
Agreement.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]
(9)
30
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf, this day of
2002.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY:
Chairman of the County Board
Assistant County Attorney And:
Date: Assistant/Deputy/County Administrator
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION:
ATTEST:
Clerk of the County Board
Assistant County Attorney CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Date:
By:
Its
And:
Its
City organized under:
Statutory Option A Option B Charter
(10)
31
. Contract No. A16561
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
During the contract term, the County shall:
1. Physically inspect and revalue 25% of the real property, as required by
law.
2. Physically inspect and value all new construction, additions and
renovation.
3. Conduct valuation reviews prior to Board of Review - approximate dates:
March through May 15.
4. Attend Board of Review. Per Board request, make all necessary review
appraisals. Approximate dates: April 1 - May 31 .
5. Keep updated field card file - current values, homestead and classification
data.
6. Print, mail and post valuation notices and homestead cards.
7. Respond to taxpayers regarding assessment or appraisal problems or
inquiries periodically.
8. Make divisions and combinations periodically.
9. Administer the abatement process pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 375.192
(1998)..
10. Make appraisals for, defend and/or negotiate all Tax Court cases.
11. Post values from appraisal cards to assessment rolls.
12. Adjust estimated market values on those properties not physically
inspected as needed and per sales analysis.
(11)
32
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02-020
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF
REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, residents within the City of St. Anthony experienced flooding in July of 1997 near
the intersection of Shamrock Drive and Silver Lane, and Fordham Drive and 39`h
Avenue and,
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony desires to provide all residents with flood protection to the
1%frequency storm event.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. ANTHONY,
- MINNESOTA:
The City of St. Anthony authorizes WSB & Associates, Inc. to prepare a feasibility study to
evaluate the alternatives available to provide 1% flood protection to the residents adjacent to
Shamrock Drive and Silver Lane and Fordham Drive and 39`h Avenue. This feasibility study
shall be completed in conformance with the attached Exhibit A, Scope of Services provided by
WSB&Associates, Inc. on January 15, 2002.
Adopted this day of 92002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
C.ID OCUME-11CKROEP-1ILOC ALS-11TEMPOR-110LK161Resolution Prep Rpt lmp.doc
33
Exhibit A
Scope of Services to Prepare a Feasibility Report
For
Silver Lane Flood Problem Area
Outlined below are the tasks associated with the completion of a feasibility report to address
flooding in and around Silver Lane and the intersections of Fordham Road and Shamrock Road
in the City of St. Anthony.
Task 1 -Request Background Information
As part of this task,the following information is anticipated to be collected:
• Storm Water Management Plan from the City of New Brighton
• Construction plans for the storm water conveyance system near the study area
from the City of New Brighton
• City of St. Anthony Storm Water Management Plan
• St. Anthony storm sewer record drawings
• Preliminary survey to record low building opening elevations and to verify
existing elevations and pipe sizes of the existing storm sewer within the study
area to be completed.
Task 2 Develop Hydrologic/Hydraulic Model
As part of this effort, a hydrologic/hydraulic model with the trade name XP-SWMM, will be
developed for the Study Area using the information contained in the City of New Brighton Storm
Water Management Plan and the City of St. Anthony Storm Water Management Plan. This
storm water model will be used to evaluate improvement alternatives.
Task 3—Explore Alternatives, Develop Preliminary Cost Estimate
Upon development of the hydrologic model, alternatives will be developed which will provide
100-year flood protection to the structures, tributary to the Silver Lane storm sewer system in the
study area. It is anticipated that six alternatives will be developed. Preliminary cost estimates
for each alternative will be prepared.
Task 4—Prepare Final Report
A final report outlining the procedures followed in developing the improvement options and the
preliminary cost estimates will be prepared. Included in this task are two meetings, one with the
City of New Brighton, and the second with Rice Creek Watershed District.
The total cost to complete the feasibility study is estimated at$18,500. Attached is the proposed
schedule, with completion of the project anticipated in February 2002.
C.IDOCUME—IICKROEP—I ILOCALS-IITEMPOR—IIOLK/61Resolution Prep Rpt lmp.doc
S
WSB 34
&Associates,Inc.
January 16, 2002
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff
Michael Morrison
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Re: Silver Lane Flood Problem Area Feasibility Report
WSB Project No. 1065-65
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
This letter is written to provide you with an update on the current status of the City of
St. Anthony's request to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) for grant funding to
complete the Silver Lane feasibility report. In December 2001, Jay Hartman and I attended
the RCWD meeting to present the City of St. Anthony's request to the board of managers.
The board of managers directed the district engineer to meet with City Staff and discuss
the extent of participation from the RCWD.
On January 10, 2002, I met with Bret Emmons of Emmons & Olivier Resources, the
District's engineer, to discuss the flood problems located in the intersection of Shamrock
Drive and Silver Lane, and the problems at Fordham Drive and 39th Avenue. Mr. Emmons
indicated that the watershed district currently does not have a grant program, which would
allow for the partial funding of the Silver Lane feasibility report. Mr. Emmons did
acknowledge that the issue does transcend municipal boundaries and may include drainage
associated with Ramsey County Ditch No. 3,both of which are issues for which the
RCWD would be interested in participation. Therefore, Mr. Emmons agreed to write a
letter to the managers outlining these items and to request consideration for participating in
the feasibility study and possibly, construction of future improvements.
Furthermore, it was determined that the City of St. Anthony is in the position to complete
this feasibility study by the end of February 2002. Attached is a scope of services to
complete the Silver Lane Flood Problem Area Feasibility Report. The district engineer
and I discussed at length the scope of this feasibility study to ensure that it would meet the
4150 Olson requirements of the RCWD for future consideration of funding. The attached scope of
Memorial Highway services includes development of an XP-SWMM hydrologic model for the problem areas.
Suite 300 It also anticipates that six alternatives will be evaluated as part of the feasibility study. The
Minneapolis anticipated cost to complete the feasibility study is $18,500.
Minnesota
55422
763.541.4800
763.541.1700 FAX Minneapolis - St. Cloud - Equal Opportunity Employer
Honorable Mayor, City County, and Staff 35
%Michael Morrison
City of St. Anthony
January 16, 2002
Page 2
The RCWD Board of Managers will receive the letter from the district's engineer in
February for consideration on partial funding of this report. At this time, I would ask your
consideration to approve preparation of the Silver Lane Flood Problem Area Feasibility
Study so that it can be completed by the end of February 2002. By completing this storm
water study early in 2002, we can explore funding alternatives, including the MnDNR, the
RCWD, City of New Brighton, and Ramsey County for participation in the recommended
alternative.
If you have any questions, please call me at (763) 287-7182.
Sincerely,
WSB &Associates, Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Associate
c: Jay Hartman, City of St. Anthony
Less Proper, City of New Brighton
Bret Emmons, Emmons & Olivier Resources
run
F:\%vDNAW1065-65\011602 hmc.doc
36
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02 - 021
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LEASE AGREEMENT
FOR PULL-TAB ACTIVITY RELATING
TO CHARITABLE GAMBLING AT
THE STONEHOUSE
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the Lease made
by the St. Anthony Sports Boosters to conduct pull-tab activity relating to charitable gambling at the
Stonehouse, a municipal-owned liquor establishment, 2700 Highway 88, located within the City of St.
Anthony.
Adopted this day of , 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
Minnesota Lawful Gambling 3(o A
Lease for Pull-Tab, Paddlewheel, Tipboard, and/or Raffle Activity - Lj1=
Name of Legal Owner of Premises Street Address City State Zip Daytime Phone
Name of Lessor Street Address City State Zip Daytime Phone
(If same as legal owner, write in "SAME")
Name of Leased Premises Street Address City Zip Daytime Phone
Name of Lessee(name of organization leasing the premises) GCB license no.of organization Daytime Phone
r.'rlan ion .4-1143e- S orjS &OCkers I„<. Q cd9Vs 412 789-07 3 I
Rent Information
• Total rent cannot exceed $1,000 per month for all An organization may not pay rent to itself or to
non-bingo activity for this premises. any of its affiliates for space used for the conduct
• For bingo activity, use lease form LG222.
of lawful gambling.
• For pull-tab dispensing machines, use lease form
LG223. Rent to be paid per month $
(If no rent is to be paid,indicate-0-)
Sketch and Dimensions of Leased Area _
Sketch: For all areas being leased for the conduct For Premises Permit Renewal Applications Only: If no
of gambling and storage of gambling product at this changes have been made at the site,you do not have to
premises, attach a sketch (drawing) showing: (1) the complete this section or provide a sketch.
leased area(s), and (2) the dimensions.
Dimensions
The leased areas are: feet by feet for a total of square feet.
feet by feet for a total of square feet.
feet by feet for a total of square feet.
Storage feet by feet for a total of square feet.
Storage feet by feet for a total of square feet.
Combined total square feet.
Lawful Gambling Activity
Type of gambling activity that will be conducted at this gambling premises. Check all that apply.
Paddlewheels ®Pull-Tabs VNL Raffles Tipboards
Term of Lease Amended Lease Only
The term of this lease agreement will be concurrent with If this is an amended lease showing changes occur-
the premises permit issued by the Gambling Control ring during the term of the current premises permit,
Board, unless terminated sooner by mutual consent of write in the date that the changes will be effective
the lessor and lessee. / / Both parties that signed the lease
must initial and date all changes.
Questions on this form should be directed to the Licensing The information requested on this form will become public
Section of the Gambling Control Board (Board) at 651-639- information when received by the Board, and will be used to
4000. This publication will be made available in alternative determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules
format(i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. Hearing impaired governing lawful gambling activities.
individuals using a TTY may call the Minnesota Relay Service Page 1 of 2
at 1-800-627-3529 and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000. 1/99
37
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02 -022
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL RELATING TO
CHARITABLE GAMBLING AT THE STONEHOUSE
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the
Application for Premises Permit Renewal made by the St. Anthony Sports Boosters to conduct
pull-tab activity relating to charitable gambling at the Stonehouse, a municipal-owned liquor
establishment,2700 Highway 88, located within the City of St. Anthony.
Adopted this day of _' 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
State of Minnesota For Board Esc
Gambling Control Board 3 '�
Premises Permit Renewal Application Amt Pd
Check#
LG214PPR Printed:9/5/2001
License Number:B-02945-001 Effective Date: 4/1/2000 Expiration Date:3/31/2002
Name of.Organization: St Anthony Village Sports Boosters _
Gambling Premises Information
Name of the establishment where gambling will be conducted
Stonehouse Note: Our records show the premises
2700 Hwy 88 is located within the city limits
St. Anthony,MN 55418
County: Hennepin
Lessor Information
Name of the property owner(If different): Square footage leased per month:
Rent paid per month: i 900 00
Square footage leased per bingo occasion:
Rent paid per bingo occasion:
Bingo Activity
Our records indicate that Bingo is not conducted on these premises.
Storage Information
2515th St NW
New Brighton,MN 55112
Bank Information
US Bank Gambling Bank
3928 Silver Lake Rd Account Number: 173100727200
St. Anthony,MN 55418
On the lines provided below list the name, address and title of at least two persons authorized to sign checks and make deposits and
withdrawals for the gambling account. The organization's treasurer may not handle gambling funds.
Name Address City, State,Zip Code Title
Susan Ruth Holten 2909 Rankin Rd St.Anthony,MN 55418
(�'afr.blsr 7n'1 r
John Fabian 4016 Macalaster St.Anthony,MN 55421
(Be sure to complete the reverse side of this application)
This form will be made available in alternative format(ie. large print,braille)upon request. Page 1 of 2 (Continued on Back)
-Do 0(Z
pfn (vim
Cd 1 A IB LC co
n�
t
T- LvoR
1
� DS
�14 iN G
W
39
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 17, 2002
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
SUBJECT: CHARITABLE GAMBLING AT THE STONEHOUSE
Resolutions 02-021 and 02-022 relate to Charitable Gambling at the Stonehouse. The City's approval
is required by the State. The City has approved like resolutions to allow the Sports Boosters to conduct
charitable gambling in St. Anthony for past years.
40
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ORDINANCE 2002-001
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PHYSICAL CULTURE AND
HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS; ADDING
SECTION 575 TO THE ST. ANTHONY CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains:
Section 1. The St. Anthony City Code is hereby amended by adding Section 575 as follows:
Section 575—PHYSICAL CULTURE AND HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS
575.01 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise clearly indicates,the following terms shall
have the stated meanings:
Massage. The rubbing, pressing, stroking, kneading,tapping, rolling,pounding,
vibrating, or stimulating the superficial parts of the human body with the hands or any
instrument by a person who is not duly licensed by the State to practice medicine,
surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy or podiatry.
"Physical Culture and Health Services," "Physical Culture and Health Club,"
"Reducing Club," "Reducing Salon," "Therapeutic Massage Studio." Any building,
room, structure, place, or establishment used by the public other than a hospital,
sanitarium, rest home, nursing home, boarding home or other institution for the
hospitalization or care of human beings, duly licensed under the provisions of M.S.
144.50 through 144.703, inclusive, where non-medical and non-surgical manipulative
exercises or massages are practiced upon the human body for a fee or other valuable
consideration by anyone not duly licensed by the State to practice medicine, surgery,
osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy or podiatry, with o_r without the use of
mechanical, therapeutic, or bathing devices.
575.02 Business License Required.
Subd. 1 Limiting Business Licenses. It is found and determined that the type of business
activity subject to being licensed under this Section is particularly subject to abuse which
may take a number of forms contrary to the morals,health, safety and general welfare of
the community. Further, it is found that control of these abuses requires intensive efforts
of the Police Department as well as other departments of the City. These efforts exceed
those required to control and regulate other business activities licensed by the City. This
concentrated use of City services tends to detract from and reduce the level of service
available to the rest of the community and thereby diminishes the ability of the City to
promote the general health, welfare, morals and safety of the community. Therefore,the
�Il
number of business licenses which may be in force under this Section at any one time
- shall not exceed seven.
Subd. 2 Requiring License and Defining Businesses Operating within City. No person,
partnership, corporation, or other organization shall operate a physical culture and health
service or club,reducing club or salon, or therapeutic massage.studio within the City,
either exclusively or in connection with any other operation or enterprise, unless such
business is currently licensed under this Section.
Subd. 3 Certain Businesses Exempt.
A. The preceding provisions of this Section notwithstanding, no business license
shall be required for a business establishment which offers massage as an
accessory use if it meets all of the following criteria as evidenced by affidavits
and other documents submitted to and in form and substance reasonably
acceptable to the Clerk:
1. The principal activity of the business shall not be performing massage
for a fee or other consideration;
2. The annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage is
less than 25%of the total annual gross revenue of the business as shown
by financial statements or an affidavit signed by the authorized Officer of
the business. In lieu of delivery of the aforementioned affidavit, at the
direction of the City,the business shall be required to deliver, a
certification from a certified public accountant, acceptable to the Manager,
that the annual gross revenue from massage services, for the preceding
twelve months, is less than 25%of its total annual gross revenue for such
period of time.
3. The room or rooms where massage is performed shall not have an
exclusive entrance from or exit to the exterior of the building in which the
principal business is located or to a public concourse or public lobby.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, massage may be performed by an
individual at the residence of the person receiving the massage.
4. All fees or other consideration derived from performing massage shall
be received by and accounted for by the proprietor of the principal
business.
5. All individuals performing massage in connection with the business
shall be employees of the principal business or shall be independent
contractors or agents who perform massage pursuant to a written
agreement with the owner of the principal business.
B. Any business that requests an exemption from the business license
requirement shall submit the required affidavits and documents on an annual
-2-
42
basis. The exemption request shall be due on or before the fifteenth day of March
of each year.
575.03 License Application and Procedures. Every application for a license under this Section
shall be made on a form supplied by the Clerk and shall be filed with the Clerk. The provisions
of Subsection 500.02 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by this Section and to the
holders of such licenses. In addition to the information required by Subsection 500.02 of this
Code,the application for a license under this Section shall contain the following information.
Failure to complete or supply such information may cause a license to be denied.
A. Whether the applicant is a natural person, a partnership,a corporation, or other
form of organization.
B. If the applicant is a natural person:
1. The true name,place and date of birth, current address and telephone
number of the applicant.
2. Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name
other than the applicant's true name; and if so, such name or names and
information concerning dates and places where used.
3. A specific statement as to the type and nature of the business to be
licensed.
4. The name of the business, if it is to be conducted under a name other
than the full individual name of the applicant, in which case a certified
copy of the certification required by M.S. Chapter 333, shall be attached to
the application.
5. The addresses at which the applicant has lived during the previous five
years, including a statement of how long the applicant has been
continuously a resident of the State during the period as of and
immediately preceding the date of application.
6. The kind, name and location of every business or occupation in which
the applicant has.been engaged during the preceding five years.
7. The names and addresses of the applicant's employer(s) and partner(s),
if any; who were such at any time during the preceding five years.
8. Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any felony, crime, or
violation of any provisions of this Code or State Law other than traffic
violations and, if so, information as to the time,place and offense for
which convictions were had.
C. If the applicant is a partnership:
-3-
43
1. The names and addresses of all partners and all information concerning
each partner as is required of an applicant under paragraph B. of this
Subsection.
2. The names(s)of the managing partner(s), and the'interest of each
partner in the business.
3. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with the
application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate as to trade
name under the provisions of M.S. Chapter 333,a certified copy of such,
certification shall also be attached.
D. If the applicant is a corporation or other organization.
1. The name of the applicant, and if incorporated,the state of
incorporation.
2. A true Certificate of Good Standing, dated as of a current.date,and true
copies of the Articles of Incorporation or Association Agreement and
Bylaws shall be attached to the application. If a foreign corporation, a
Certificate of Authority issued pursuant to M.S. Chapter 303, shall also be
attached.
3. The name of the person(s) who is to manage the business and all
information concerning the person(s)as is required of an applicant under
paragraph B. of this Subsection.
4. The names of all officers, directors and persons who control or own an
interest in excess of 5% in such corporation or organization and all
information concerning the persons as is required of an applicant under
paragraph B. of this Subsection.
E. The location of the business premises.
F. Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities or has had a license
revoked, or has been denied a license, to conduct any of the activities,required to
be licensed hereunder; and if so, when and where the applicant is or was so
licensed, has had a license revoked or has been denied a license.
G. The names, residences and business addresses of three residents of Hennepin
County or Ramsey County, not related to the applicant or financially interested in
the business to be licensed, who may be referred to by the City for information as
to the applicant's character. If the applicant is a partnership, three such names
shall be supplied for each partner, and if the applicant is a corporation or other
organization, three such names shall be supplied for each officer of the applicant
and each manager of the business.
-4-
44
H. The amount of capital investment to be made by the applicant in the premises
described in the application to operate the business to be licensed. Capital
investment shall mean the amount of money that the applicant actually invests to
acquire, refurbish, repair, remodel, or furnish the premises, including moneys
invested to comply with Subsection 575.14,
I. A financial statement, certified as being true and correct by an independent
accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be licensed for the last
three fiscal years of such business, or shorter period of time that the applicant may
have been in the business to be licensed, itemized as to each activity of the
business including, without limitation,the gross income from performing
massage.
575.04 Execution of Application. All applications for any license under this Section shall be -
signed by the applicant in accordance with Subd. 2 of subsection 500.02 of the Code. Any
falsification of information on any license application shall result in the denial of the license
applied for, and shall constitute adequate grounds for the suspension or revocation of any license
issued to the applicant.
575.05 License and Investigation Fees.
Subd. 1 License Fee. Each application for a license or renewal license shall be
accompanied by payment in full of the'required license fee. The fee for a business
license shall be as set forth in Subsection 615.06 of this Code. Upon rejection of any
application for a license, the Clerk shall refund the amount paid.
Subd. 2 Investigation Fee. At the time of each original application for a business license,
the applicant shall deposit an investigation fee as set forth in Subsection 615.06 of this
Code. The cost of the investigation will be based on the expense involved. All deposit
monies not expended on the investigation will be refunded to the applicant.
575.06 Investigation. All applications shall be referred by the Clerk to the Police Department
and to such other City departments for investigation of the applicant's character and verification
of the facts set forth in the application. Within 60 days after the application date,the Police
Chief and any other consultants shall submit a written recommendation to the Manager as to
issuance or non-issuance of the license, setting forth the facts upon which the recommendation is
based.
575.07 Approval or Denial of Application. Within 90 days after the application date,the
Manager shall either approve or deny the application and shall notify the Clerk in writing of the
decision. If the application is approved, the Clerk shall issue the license. If the application is
denied,the Clerk shall furnish written notice of the denial to the applicant,together with the
reason or reasons for denial. A license may also be denied for any of the following reasons:
Subd. 1 Under Legal Age. If an individual applicant is under the age of 18.
Subd. 2 Convictions. If the applicant, or any officers, managers, directors, shareholders
or owners, if a corporation or association,or any partners, if a partnership, has been
-5-
45
convicted of a felony, or has been convicted of any illegal conduct involving moral
turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.
Subd. 3 Conviction without Sufficient Rehabilitation. If the applicant, or any principal
officers,managers, directors, shareholders or owners, if a corporation or association, or
any partners, if a partnership,has been convicted of any crime or crimes directly relating
to the occupation of massage services,as provided in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 2, and has not
shown competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to perform the
duties of the occupation of massage services, as provided in M.S. 364.03, Subd. 3.
Subd. 4 Prior Denial of License. If the applicant,or any principal officers, managers,
directors, shareholders or owners, if a corporation or association, or any partners, if a
partnership, has within one year prior to the date of application been denied a license
under this Section, or any similar ordinance of any municipality within the State,or
within the period has had revoked any license issued under this Section, or any similar
ordinance of any municipality within the State.
Subd. 5 Zoning Restriction. If the business to be licensed is not permitted by Chapter 16
of this Code upon the premises described in the application.
Subd. 6 Failure to Meet Construction Requirements. If the premises described in the
application for a business license fail to comply with the requirements of Subsection
575.14.
575.08 Renewal Application. Not less than 30 nor more than 60 days before the expiration of
any license issued pursuant to this Section, any license holder desiring to renew the license shall
submit a written application to the Clerk on forms provided by the City together with payment in
full of the license fee as required for the original license. The renewal application shall be
forwarded to the Manager who shall, within 30 days after the renewal application date, either
approve or deny the application and shall notify the Clerk in writing of the decision. The Clerk
shall then issue the license or, in case of denial, notify the applicant in writing of the denial
setting forth the reason or reasons therefor.
575.09 Appeal to Council. Any applicant may appeal the denial of a license or a license renewal
by filing a written notice of appeal to the Council in the Clerk's office within 10 days after the
denial. The Council shall hear the appeal within 60 days after the notice is filed, and opportunity
shall be given to any person to be heard in favor of or opposing the issuance or renewal of the
license. The Council may order and conduct such additional investigation as it deems necessary.
Any licensee is authorized to continue to operate until final action by the Council upon licensee's
renewal application,unless prohibited by Council resolution made after the denial.
575.10 License Not Transferable; Duration. Each license shall be issued to the applicant only
and shall not be transferable to another holder. Any change in the persons named as partners on
the application, as required by paragraph C.1 of Subsection 575.03 and any change in the persons
who are named in the application as required by paragraph DA of Subsection 575.03 shall be
deemed a transfer for purposes of this Section. If the licensee is a limited partnership,a change
in the limited partners of less than 25%cumulatively over the license period shall not be deemed
-6-
46
a transfer. The change in or addition of a vice-president, secretary, or treasurer of a corporate
licensee shall not be deemed a transfer. All licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall be
effective for the period provided in Section 500.07.
575.11 Suspension or Revocation of License. The Council may suspend for any period not
exceeding 60 days, or revoke,.any license issued pursuant to this Section upon finding'a violation
of any provision of this Section or upon violation of any other provision of this Code or State
Law or regulation affecting the activities covered by this Section. Any conviction for
prostitution or any other crime or violation involving moral turpitude shall result in the
revocation of any license issued under this Section. Except in the case of a suspension pending a
hearing on revocation, revocation or suspension by the Council shall be preceded by written
notice to the licensee of a hearing. The notice may be served upon the licensee personally or by
mailing it to the business or residence address set forth in the application or on file with the
Clerk. The notice shall give at least ten days notice of the time and place of the hearing and shall
state the nature of the charges against the licensee. The Council may, without notice, suspend
any license pending a hearing on revocation for a period not exceeding 30 days.
575.12 Hours of Operation. No business licensed under this Section shall be open for business,
nor shall any customers be permitted on the premises,between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00
A.M.
575.13 Restrictions and Regulations.
Subd. 1 Notice of Change in Management. The individual designated by a partnership
or a corporation in its business license application to be manager and in responsible
charge of the business shall remain responsible for the conduct of the business until
another suitable person has been designated in writing by the license holder. The license
holder shall promptly give the Police Department written notice of any such change
indicating the name and address of the new manager and the effective date of the change.
Subd. 2 Clothing Requirements. Employees of businesses licensed under this section
shall be and shall remain fully clothed while performing massage.
Subd. 3 Location of Services. No person shall perform a massage for a fee or other
consideration at any place other than(i) a physical culture and health service,physical
culture or health club, reducing salon, or therapeutic massage studio that has been duly
licensed pursuant to Subd. 2 of Subsection 575.02, (ii)a business which is exempt from a
business license pursuant to Subd. 3 of Subsection 575.02, or(iii) the residence of the
person receiving the massage.
Subd. 4 No Services Allowed by Sexually Oriented Businesses. No person shall perform
a massage for a fee or other consideration in connection with a sexually oriented business
as defined by Subd. 87 of Subsection 1605 of this Code.
575.14 Construction Requirements. No business license shall be issued under this Section
unless the premises used for the operation shall comply with the following requirements:
-7-
47
Subd. 1 Requirements for Steam or Hot Air Rooms. All rooms utilizing steam or hot air
as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent, and all restrooms, changing rooms and
bathrooms used in connection with such rooms, shall be constructed with materials
impervious to moisture,bacteria, mold and fungus growth. Floor-to-wall and wall-to-
wall joints shall be constructed so as to provide a sanitary cove with a minimum radius of
3/8 inch. .
Subd. 2 Public Restroom Requirements. All public restrooms shall be provided with
mechanical ventilation with 2 cfin(cubic feet per minute)per square foot area, a
minimum of 15 foot candles of illumination, a hand washing sink equipped with hot and
cold running water under pressure, sanitary towels with dispensers and soap-with
dispensers.
Subd. 3 Requirements for Janitor's Closet. Each such operation shall have a janitor's
closet for the storage of cleaning supplies with a mop sink, mechanical ventilation with 2
cfin per square foot area and a minimum of 15 footcandles of illumination.
Subd. 4 Lockers. Individual lockers shall be provided for use by customers and shall
have separate keys for locking.
575.15 Maintenance, Sanitary Conditions, Communicable Disease.
Subd. 1 Clean and Sanitary Business. All businesses licensed under this Section at all
times shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
Subd. 2 Clean and Sanitary Instruments. All instruments and mechanical,therapeutic,
and bathing devices or parts that come into contact with the human body at all times shall
be kept clean and sanitary.
Subd. 3 Towels and Linens. No towels and linens furnished for use by one patron shall
be furnished for use by another until thoroughly laundered.
Subd. 4 Hand Washing. All individuals who practice massage shall wash their hands
before each massage.
Subd. 5 Communicable Disease. No person suffering from a communicable disease_
shall work or be employed in a licensed business. No person suffering from a
communicable disease to the knowledge of the owner,custodian, or employees of a
licensed business shall be accommodated as a patron.
575.16 Inspection. Each business required to be licensed shall at all times be held open for
inspection by duly authorized representatives of the City.
575.17 Barber Shops and Beauty Salons Exempted. Barber shops and beauty salons which do
not give, or hold themselves out to give, massages, other than are customarily given in such
shops and salons for the purpose of facial beautification only shall not be subject to the
provisions of this Section.
-8-
48.
Section 2. Subsection 615.06 of the St. Anthony City Code shall be amended to add the
following fee for licenses issued under Section 575 of the St. Anthony City Code:
Minnesota Applicable
License Fee Term Transferable. . Statutes Code Section
Physical Culture and Health $250 license
Service or Club,Reducing Club fee and$500
or Salon,Sauna Parlor, investigation
Therapeutic Massage Studio fee deposit
One Year No 575
Section 3. Clause (eee) of Subsection 1635.02 of the St. Anthony City Code shall be
amended to read as follows:
(eee) Physicians, dentists and health care professionals, including optometrists,
chiropractors, chiropodists and osteopaths,therapists, and physical culture and
health service or club,reducing club or salon or therapeutic massage studio, as
defined in Subsection 575.01.
Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective as of the date of its publication. Any
person, partnership,corporation, or other organization operating a physical culture and health
service or club, reducing club or salon or therapeutic massage studio in the City as of the
effective date of this ordinance which is required to obtain a business license under this
ordinance shall comply with this ordinance no later than 120 days after the effective date of this
ordinance.
First Reading: January 8, 2002
Second Reading: January 22, 2002
Adopted:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
-9-
49
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Village of Saint Anthony
Methodology:
This study contains the results of a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected residents of the
Village of Saint Anthony. Survey responses were gathered by professional interviewers between
November 26`h and December 12'h, 2001. The average interview took twenty-one minutes. In
general, random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of adult Saint
Anthony residents within f 5.0 percentage points in 95 out of 100 cases.
Residential Demographics:
Fifteen percent of Saint Anthony residents reported moving to the community within the past
five years, while twenty-five percent had lived there for more than thirty.years. The median
residential longevity proved to be 14.3 years, indicative of a mature suburban area with a
substantial renter population. Senior households composed a large forty-two percent of the
community's residences; in fact, thirty-four percent of the households were composed entirely
of senior citizens. Twenty-four percent of the households reported the presence of school-aged
children, while seven percent had pre-schoolers in residence. Thirty-six percent classified their
households as "single," with the vast majority containing"no others." Sixty-two percent
reported they were "married or living with a partner," with forty-one percent of this group
reporting the presence of children. Ninety-five percent called themselves White;with the
remainder split between African-American, Hispanic-Latino, Asian-Pacific Islander, and Native
American.
The average age of an adult resident was found to be 54.8 years old. In fact, thirty-five percent
of the population was found to be 65 years old or older. Women outnumbered men by two -
percent in the sample. Forty-eight percent reported they had completed college or undertaken
post-graduate coursework; twenty-seven percent were high school graduates or less well-
educated, while twenty-five percent had post-secondary educational experience short of the
completion of college. Thirty-seven percent of the community's households were led by
retirees. Professional-Technical job holders led twenty-four percent of the households, and Blue
Collar employees headed sixteen percent. The median pre-tax household income was found to
be $49,000.00. Eleven percent reported levels of under$25,000.00 yearly, while eight percent
reported earning over$100,000.00 annually.
Page 1
5®
Village of Saint Anthony
Executive Summary
January, 2002
Twenty-eight percent of the sample reported living in Precinct.One; while forty-one percent
resided.in Precinct Two. Precinct Three residents, in Ramsey County,accounted for the
remaining thirty percent of the community.
Quality of Life:
Ninety-six percent of the residents rated the quality of life in Saint Anthony as either"excellent"
or"good." Only four percent were more critical in their evaluations.. The thirty-eight percent
rating the quality of life as "excellent"placed the village well within the top quartile of inner-
ring suburban areas.
Saint Anthony citizens were very contented with their community. When asked what they liked
most about the community, twenty-seven percent cited "small town ambience," while thirty-
three percent of the residents pointed to "central location of the community." "Quiet and
peacefulness" was posted by fourteen percent, seven percent cited"nice people," and five
percent each mentioned "strong neighborhoods,""good schools,"and "safe area." Only one
_major serious issue facing the community was identified: "Apache Mall," at thirty-one percent.
Nine percent pointed to "high taxes".and seven percent talked about the "need for more
businesses." A comparatively normal six percent were "boosters"who saw absolutely no
serious issues facing the community today.
Eighty-nine percent rated the general sense of community among Saint Anthony residents as
either"excellent" or"good;" only ten percent were more critical in their judgments. This rating
proved to be comparatively strong when measured against other inner-ring suburban
communities.
Public Safety:
Eighty percent reported they felt either"very safe" or"reasonably safe" walking alone in their
neighborhood after dark; eighteen percent, though, felt"unsafe." Seventy percent, in fact, could
identify no areas in the community where they would be afraid to walk alone at night. Only one
area provoked mild concern: Apache Mall.
Seventy-one percent thought crime in their neighborhood has "remained about the same"during
the past two years. Nineteen percent saw an"increase," while three percent believed it
"decreased." Twenty-seven percent were able to recall the name of at least one Saint Anthony
Police Officer. And, twenty-eight percent reported a household member had participated in a
Neighborhood Block Club,Neighborhood Block Party, or activities for National Night Out
Page 2
51
Village of Saint Anthony
Executive Summary
January, 2002
during the past year.
Tax Climate and City Services:
When considering the value of city services—quality versus cost—seventy-two percent rated
it highly, while eighteen percent were more critical. City service evaluations were very positive
overall. Fire protection, emergency medical services, and snowplowing of city streets scored
very solid approval ratings of ninety percent or higher. Just behind, eighty-seven percent rated
police protection positively. Eighty-three percent thought the same about pavement repair and
patching on city streets, and eighty-two percent rated park maintenance positively. Seventy-nine
percent rated sanitary sewer services as either"excellent"or"good," while seventy-eight percent
similarly viewed property maintenance enforcement. Animal control was identically rated by
seventy-four percent. Sixty-seven percent rated recreational programs positively. But, while
sixty-two percent rated accommodation and control of storm water run-off as either"excellent"
or"good," a large twenty-three percent considered it to be either"only fair" or"poor." Among
the reasons for critical evaluations, "flooding"was cited by forty percent, with smaller numbers
pointing to "potholes," "loose animals," and "messy yards."
Generally, the property tax climate in the Village of Saint Anthony must be considered
"moderately hostile." Forty-two percent thought their property taxes were"high," while a forty-
one percent called them "about average." In addition, one percent classified their property taxes
as "low," and sixteen percentage were "uncertain."
By a solid 62%-18% margin, residents would favor an increase in their village property tax if it
were needed to maintain village services at their current level. Opponents most often
recommended cuts in park and recreation services to'avoid higher property taxes. By an
overwhelming 70%-9% verdict, respondents also opposed a reduction in city services if their
village property taxes could be reduced. Again, supporters of this approach favored cuts in park
and recreation services.
City Government and City Staff.
A substantial forty-seven percent were unable to rate the job performance of the Mayor and City
Council. Overall, the Mayor and Council were awarded a job approval rating of thirty-seven
percent and a disapproval rating of seventeen percent. The level of the approval rating was
sixteen percent lower than the Metropolitan Area suburban norm. Not surprisingly, fifty-two
percent of the community felt they knew "very little"about the Mayor and the City Council.
Positive evaluations were based upon a generalized feeling they were doing a"good job"and the
Page 3
52
Village of Saint Anthony
Executive Summary
January, 2002
apparent"lack of community problems." Negative evaluations stemmed from specific issue
disagreements.
The Village Staff received a job approval rating of forty-six percent and a disapproval rating of
only seven percent. Both the approval and disapproval ratings were at the Metropolitan Area
suburban norm. "Helpfulness" and "good job"were two major reasons for high evaluations.
The twenty-six percent of the residents reporting first-hand contact with the staff was about four
percent lower than in comparable suburban areas. The City Staff, then, serve a large percentage
of the population and, even more importantly, serve it very well.
Recreational Facilities and Opportunities:
A moderately high sixty-five percent rated the park and recreational facilities in Saint Anthony
as "excellent" or"good,"while fourteen percent rated them lower. Similarly, fifty-five percent
felt either"very well informed" or"somewhat well informed" about the Saint Anthony Park
System and Facilities. During the past year, forty-seven percent of the sample reported
household members had used the.Saint Anthony Community Center; eighty percent of the users
rated the facility and programs as "excellent" or"good,"while twenty percent were more critical
in their judgments. Forty-eight percent were unable to rate the sufficiency of youth programs
offered in the community; however, forty-two percent deemed them sufficient and only nine
percent saw them as lacking in some way.
Facilities Needs:
By a 54%-21% margin, residents supported a property tax increase for a replacement Fire
. Station 4, which would house equipment, training facilities, and emergency medical services.
And,by a 46%-23%judgment, they also supported a property tax increase for a replacement
Public Works building to serve as a garage and repair area for heavy city equipment. The typical
resident would support a property tax increase of$26.60 annually to fund a new facilities
program for the Village of Saint Anthony. But, while twenty percent would oppose any tax
increase for this purpose, twenty-one percent would support twice this level.
Municipal Liquor Stores and Stonehouse Bar and Grill:
Sixty-six percent of the residents reported visiting one of the Municipal Liquor Stores during the
past twelve months. Over eighty percent rated the store and staff positively on a series of
customer service dimensions: courtesy of the staff, assistance provided by the staff, knowledge
Page 4
53
Village of Saint Anthony
Executive Summary
January, 2002
of the staff, convenient location of the store, organization of the store for ease of shopping, as
well as the.store being clean and well-lit.
Sixty-three percent thought a relocation of the Off-Sale Liquor Store located near the Stonehouse
Bar and Grill and Fire Station to a site on New Brighton Boulevard would make"no difference"
in their willingness to shop there. Eight percent reported they would be "more likely" to do so,
while seventeen percent were "less likely" to shop at the new location. By a 54%-14% margin,
though, residents supported the relocation of the Off-Sale Liquor Store if the former site were to
be redeveloped.
By a decisive 74%-11% majority, respondents supported the Village of Saint Anthony operating
Municipal Liquor Stores and using the profits to fund village services and programs. By a
similarly sweeping 65%-19% majority, residents also supported the Village of Saint Anthony
operating food and bar establishments. And, residents supported a referendum,by a 58%-19%
margin, to allow the Village simultaneously to issue liquor licenses to community restaurants
and close the Stonehouse Bar. Also, if charitable gambling funding of youth recreation
programs were no longer available because of these changes, the typical resident would be
willing to support a property tax increase of$22.60 to fund this type of programming.
Drain Tile Systems:
Twenty-five percent of the sample reported they had a drain tile system at their residence.
Among this group, seventy-two percent stated they had a sump pump system there. And,
eighteen percent of these households indicated their drain tiles or sump pump were connected
directly to the village's sanitary sewers.
Organized Refuse Collection:
Fifty-one percent endorsed the current system of refuse hauler selection used in the Village of
Saint Anthony. Sixteen percent would prefer the Village to assign current haulers to exclusively
handle specific areas based on a bidding process, and thirteen percent would opt for the Village
designating one hauler to serve the entire community. Twelve percent were indifferent and nine
percent were uncertain about the best approach.
Page 5
54
Village of Saint Anthony
Executive Summary
January, 2002
Sources of Information:
Thirty-six percent of the sample reported their principal source of information about Village
government and its activities was the "Saint Anthony Bulletin." Seventeen percent used the
"grapevine," and ten percent depended on the "Northeaster." Nine percent each relied upon the
"city newsletter" or"cable television." Seventy-five percent thought the quality and the amount
of information they received from the Village of Saint Anthony was "about right,"while twenty-
two percent saw it as "too little."
Eighty percent recalled receiving the"Village Notes"newsletter during the past year. A very
strong eighty-seven percent of households receiving the newsletter reported members regularly
read it. Even more impressively, eighty-six percent rated the newsletter as either"very
effective" or"somewhat effective" in keeping them informed about activities in Saint Anthony.
Sixty-one percent of the households in the sample received cable television. Among those
households, a rather large fifty-two percent watched local programming on North Suburban
Cable Channel 16 during the past six months.
Sixty-three percent of the sample reported the presence of at least one computer at home. Most,
eighty-seven percent, had access to the Internet from at least one home-based computer. A
comparatively large thirteen percent of the sample visited the Village of Saint Anthony's
webpage during the past year.
Saint Anthony-New Brighton Public Schools:
A relatively solid sixty-five percent rated the quality of education provided by the Saint Anthony
New Brighton Public Schools as either"excellent"or"good." Only four percent were more
critical, with thirty-one percent unable to provide a rating.
In evaluating aspects of the School District operations, large numbers of residents were simply
unable to provide a judgment; negative judgments proved to be minimal. By a 48%-6% split,
residents agreed that during the last few years, the Saint Anthony-New Brighton School District
Administration and School Board have spent tax money effectively and efficiently. By a 51%-
8%judgment, respondents felt when the Saint Anthony-New Brighton School District asks
voters to approve a property tax increase, it is only as a last resort after the Administration and
School Board have considered all other budget alternatives. By a 52%-5% verdict, residents
agreed the Saint Anthony-New Brighton School District has been honest with residents about the
ways in which they spend tax money. And, by a solid 62%-5% result, residents stated they trust
the Saint Anthony-New Brighton School District School Board and Administration to do what is
Page 6
55
Village ojSaint Anthony
Executive Summary
January, 2002
right for the children in this district.
Conclusions:
1. Life in the Village of Saint Anthony was graded very highly by residents. The quality of
life rating was solid and evaluations of both taxes and village services were also
comparatively very high. Knowledge about the work of the Mayor and City'Council
proved to be lower than the norm, although, among those who were aware,judgments
were positive. The City Staff, though, received very solid evaluations and were even
more highly valued by residents coming into direct contact with them. One issue,
though, concerned many residents—flooding and the accommodation and control of
storm water run-off.
2. Support for a replacement Fire Station and Public Works building proved to be
marginally strong. Convincing the undecided voters will be key to the success of any
referendum effort. And, keeping the overall property tax increase as close to $27.00 on
the median priced home will also be a critical consideration.
3. Village residents were generally supportive of the Saint Anthony Municipal Liquor
Stores, rating both the staff and facilities very highly. In fact,almost three-quarters
supported the operation of the stores and using the profits to fund village services and
programs. A change of location of the store located near the Stonehouse Bar and Grill
and the Fire Station did not dramatically impact future patronage. And, a solid majority
of those holding opinions.supported the move if the current site were to be redeveloped.
4. Just under two-thirds of the sample supported the Village of Saint Anthony operating
food and bar establishments. But, even so, by a 58%-19% margin, residents supported a
referendum allowing the Village to issue liquor licenses to community restaurants and
closing the Stonehouse Bar. And, if charitable gambling revenue—currently used to
fund youth recreation programs —were no longer available, the typical resident would
support a yearly property tax increase of$22.60 to fund those programs.
5. The Saint Anthony-New Brighton School District was well-regarded. Very little
criticism was found in the study about its operation or performance. However, there was
a very large level of uncertainty about the School District, suggesting a need for better
and more focused communications with residents.
Page 7
56
Village of Saint Anthony
Executive Summary
January, 2002
In conclusion, Saint Anthony residents graded their.village enterprise very positively in
comparison with other inner-ring suburbs. It is clear that Village Government has stayed well
ahead of the curve in meeting or exceeding residential expectations. Further, it continues to do
an exemplary job in protecting the core values that attracted— and continue to attract—
residents to Saint Anthony, as well as recasting the community in order to meet future needs.
Page 8
DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. VILLAGE OF SAINT ANTHON_ 57
3128 Dean Court RESIDENTIAL STUDY
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 FINAL November 2001
Hello, I'm of Decision Resources, Ltd. , a polling firm
located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the Village of
Saint Anthony to speak with a random sample of residents about
issues facing the city. The survey is being taken because your .
city representatives and staff are interested in your opinions
and suggestions. I want to assure you that all .individual re-
sponses will be held strictly confidential; only summaries of the
entire sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE)
1 . Approximately how many years have LESS THAN ONE YEAR. . . . .4%
you lived in the Village of Saint ONE OR TWO YEARS. . . .:. . 11015
Anthony? THREE TO FIVE YEARS. . . 15%
SIX TO TEN YEARS. . . . . . 14%
ELEVEN - TWENTY YRS. . . 17%
TWENTY - THIRTY YRS. . . 14%
OVER THIRTY YEARS. . . . . 25%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 001
2 . How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 38%
life in Saint Anthony -- excel- GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58%
lent, good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3%
POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 0%
3 . What do you like most about living in the Village of Saint
Anthony?
LOCATION, 33%; SMALL TOWN, 27%; QUIET/PEACEFUL, 140;
SAFE, 5%; SCHOOLS, 50; NEIGHBORHOOD, 5%; PEOPLE, 7%;
CITY SERVICES, 2%; SCATTERED, 2% .
4 . What do you think is the most serious issue facing the .
Village of Saint Anthony today?
UNSURE, 20%; NOTHING, 6%; GROWTH, 2%; CRIME, 3%; TAXES,
9%; CITY GOVERNMENT, 3%; FLOODING, 30; SCHOOLS, 3%; .
APACHE MALL, 31%; AFFORDABLE HOUSING, 3%; NEED MORE BUSI-
NESSES, 70; RUNDOWN AREAS, 2%; ROADS/INFRASTRUCTURE, 3%;
CITY FINANCIAL ISSUES, 3%; SCATTERED, 3% .
5 . How would you rate the general EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 26%
sense of community among Saint An- GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63%
thony residents -- excellent, ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9%
good, only fair, or poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 21
On another topic . . . . . . .
1
6 . How safe would you feel walking VERY SAFE. . . . . . . . . . . . .43%-
alone in your neighborhood after REASONABLY SAFE. . . . . . . 37 : 58
dark -- very safe, reasonably SOMEWHAT SAFE. . . . . . . . . 10�
safe, somewhat safe, or very un- VERY UNSAFE. . . . . . . . . . . . 8%
safe? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 20
7 . Are there any areas in the Village of Saint Anthony where
you would be afraid to walk alone at night? . (IF "YES, " .
.ASK: ) Where would they be?
UNSURE, 4%; NONE, 660; EVERYWHERE, 150; APACHE MALL, 50;
APARTMENTS, 2%; MINNEAPOLIS BORDER, 2%; SILVER LAKE ROAD,
3%; SCATTERED, 4% .
8 . Within the past two years, do you INCREASED. . . . . . . . . . . . . 19%
think crime in your neighborhood DECREASED. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3%
has increased, decreased, or re- ABOUT THE SAME. . . . . . . . 7106
mained about the same? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 8%
9 . Offhand, do you recall the name of YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27%
one Saint Anthony Police NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72%
Officer? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 1%
10 . During the past year, have you or YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28%
household members participated in NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72%
a Neighborhood Block Club, Neigh- DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 0%
borhood Block Party, or activities
for the National Night Out?
I would like to read you a list of a few village services. For
each one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of
the service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor?
EXCL GOOD FAIR POOR D.K.
11 . Police protection? 38 5701 306 006 306
12 . Fire protection? 40% 56% 006 001 406
13 . Emergency medical services? 36% 54% 1% 001 901
14 . Sanitary sewer service? 1306 660 60 3% 1306
15 . Accommodation and control of
storm water run-off? 7% 5506 14% 906 1606
16 . Animal control? 1206 620 5% 3% 18%
17 . Park maintenance? 1706 65% 501 11 1306
18 . Recreational programs? - 13% 54% 4% 0% 2906
19 . Property maintenance enforce-
ment? 906 69% 606 206 1406
20 . Pavement repair and patching
on city streets? 10% 73% 10% 506 2%
21 . Snowplowing of city streets? 2606 66% 4% 201 301
IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" ON ANY OF ABOVE CITY SERVICES, ASK:
(N=176)
2
22 . Why do you feel that way? 59
FLOODING, 40%; POTHOLES, 140; LOOSE ANIMALS, 901;
MESSY YARDS, 11%; SLOW SERVICE, 8%; UPDATE PARKS, 20;
NEED MORE PROGRAMS, 5%; SEWER BACKUPS, 5%; . NOT ENOUGH
POLICE PATROLLING, 2%; POOR JOB, 40 .
23 . Would you favor or oppose an in- FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . 62%
crease in YOUR village property OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
tax if it were needed to maintain DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 20%
village services at their current
level?
IF "OPPOSE, " ASK: (N=71)
24 . What services would you be willing to see cut to keep
property taxes at their current level?
UNSURE, 41%; NONE, 6%; PARKS AND RECREATION, 32%;
ANIMAL CONTROL, 4%; POLICE, 3%; ADMINISTRATION, 3%;
FIRE DEPARTMENT, 3%; SCATTERED, 8% .
25 . Would you favor or oppose a reduc- FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
tion in city services if 'your vil- OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70%
lage property taxes could be re- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. : . . 2106
duced?
IF "FAVOR, " ASK: (N=35)
26 . What services would you be willing to see cut to reduce.
your property taxes?
UNSURE 40%; PARKS AND RECREATION, 29%; MORE EFFI-
CIENT, 6%; ANIMAL CONTROL, 90; ADMINISTRATION, 3%;
FIRE DEPARTMENT, 3%, SCATTERED, 11% .
. 27 . Do you consider village property VERY HIGH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9%
taxes in Saint Anthony to be very SOMEWHAT HIGH. . . . . . . . . 331
high, somewhat high, about aver- ABOUT AVERAGE. . . . . . . . .416
age, somewhat low, or very low? SOMEWHAT LOW. . . . . . . . . . . 1%
VERY LOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 1601
28 . When you consider the property EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 12%
taxes you pay and the quality GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60%
of village services you receive, ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17%
would you rate the general value POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
of village services as excellent, DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 11%
good, only fair, or poor?
Moving on. . . .
3
29 . How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6'L 60
about the work of the Saint An- FAIR AMOUNT. . . . . . . . . . . 34=
thony Village Council -- a great VERY LITTLE. . . . . . . . . . . 52%
deal, a fair amount, or very DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 8%
little?
30 . From what you know, do you approve STRONGLY APPROVE. . . . . . . 50
or disapprove of the job perform- APPROVE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32%
ance of the Saint Anthony Village . DISAPPROVE. . . . . . . . . . . . 151.
Council? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And STRONGLY DISAPPROVE. . . . 21
do you feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . .470
IF OPINION STATED IN QUESTION #30, ASK: (N=214)
31 . Why do you feel that way?
UNSURE, 60; GOOD JOB, 4011; POOR JOB, 9%; NO PROB-
LEMS, 11%; ISSUES, 17%; DON'T LISTEN, 6%; HEARSAY,
21; LISTEN, 3%; WASTE MONEY, 2%; COULD IMPROVE, 3%;
SCATTERED, 1% .
32 . How much first-hand contact have QUITE A LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . 6%
you had with the Saint Anthony SOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20%
Village Staff -- quite a lot, VERY LITTLE. . . . . . . . . . .37%
some, very little, or none at all? NONE AT ALL. . . . . . . . . . .3106
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 6%
33 . From what you know, how would you EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7%
rate the job performance of the GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39%
Saint Anthony Village Staff -- ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5%
excellent, good, only fair, or POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2%
poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . .47%
IF RATING IS GIVEN IN QUESTION#33 , ASK: (N=213)
34 . Why did you rate village staff as ?
UNSURE, 9%; GOOD JOB, 21%; POOR JOB, 60; HELPFUL,
43%; NO PROBLEMS, 10%; DON' T LISTEN, 311; HEARSAY,
4%; LISTEN, 2%; SCATTERED, 3% .
Let' s talk about park and recreation opportunities in the Village
of Saint Anthony. . . . .
35 . In general, how well informed are VERY. WELL INFORMED. . . . 10%
you about the Saint Anthony Park SOMEWHAT INFORMED. . . . .45%
System and facilities -- Would you NOT TOO WELL. . . . . . . . . . 2601
say you are very well informed, NOT AT ALL. . . . . . . . . . . . 15%
somewhat informed, not too well DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . .4%
informed, or not at all informed?
4
36 . How would you rate park and recre- EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 121: ��
ation facilities in Saint Anthony GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53'
-- excellent, good, only fair, or ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . 12�
poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 210
37 . During the past year, have you or NO. . 541
members of your household used the YES/EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . 9.0
Saint' Anthony Community -Center? YES/GOOD. . . . .. . . . . . . .... . 280
(IF "YES, " ASK: ) Would you rate YES/ONLY .FAIR. . . . . . . . . ..60
the Community Center facility and YES/POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
programs as excellent, good, only YES/UNSURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
fair, or poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . to
38 . From what you have seen or heard, YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .420
are there a sufficient number of NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
youth programs offered in the com- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . .480
munity?
Changing topics. . . .
The Village of Saint Anthony is reviewing its facilities needs,
given both the age and adequacy of its buildings and current
demographic changes in the population. In particular, there have
been discussions about the current Fire Station and Public Works
building. To upgrade present facilities or build new ones, a
property tax increase would be required. For each of the follow-
ing, please tell me if you would strongly support, somewhat
support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose a property tax
increase for that purpose. If you have' no opinion, just say
so. . . .
STS SMS SMO STO DKR
39 . A replacement Fire Station
to house equipment, training
facilities, and emergency
medical services . 160 380 130 80 260
40 . A replacement Public Works
building to serve as a
garage and repair area for
heavy city equipment, such
as snow plows and road
maintenance vehicles . 150 310 150 80 310
Suppose the Village of Saint Anthony proposed an approach for the
replacement of the current Fire Station and Public Works building
which you considered reasonable . Residents would be asked to
increase their property taxes for twenty years to cover the costs
of construction bonds .
5
41 . How much would you be willing to NOTHING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20%
increase your property tax to fund $20 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15% 6Z
a new facilities program for the $40 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8%
Village of Saint Anthony? Let' s $60 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11%
say, would you be willing to in- $80 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5%
crease your property taxes by $100 . 00 . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .3%
$ ? (CHOOSE RANDOM STARTING $120 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . .•. . . . 2%
POINT; MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING DON'T KNOW. ... . . . . . . . . . 35%
ON ANSWER) How about $ per REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3%
year? (REPEAT PROCESS)
Moving on. . . .
As you may know, the Village of Saint Anthony owns and operates
Municipal Liquor Stores .
42 . Have you visited any of these YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66%
stores during the past twelve NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34%
months? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 0%
IF "YES, " ASK: (N=266)
Please rate the store and/or staff on each of the following
criteria. For each one, please tell me if you would rate it
as excellent, good, only fair, or poor. If you have no
opinion about it, just say so.
EXCL GOOD. FAIR POOR DKRF
43 . Courtesy of staff? 2.9% 60% 701 00 4%
44 . Assistance provided by
staff? 23% 610 1001 0% 6%
45 . Knowledge of staff? 19% 64% 1 6% 0% 10%
46 . Convenient location of
store? 33% 62% 2% 0% 31
47 . Organization of store
for- ease of shopping? 21% 67% 606 0% 701
48 . Cleanliness and well-
lighted store? 26% 64% 6% 106 4%
If the Off-Sale Liquor Store. located near the Stonehouse Bar and
Grill and the Fire Station were to move from its present location
to a site on New Brighton . Boulevard. . . .
49 . Would you be more or -less likely MUCH MORE LIKELY. . . . . . . 3%
to shop at the store at the new SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY. . . 5%
location? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Is NO DIFFERENCE. . . . . . . . . 63%
that much (more/less) likely or SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY. . 12%
only somewhat (more/less) ? MUCH LESS LIKELY. . . . . . . 5%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 13%
6
63
50 . Would you support ' or oppose the STRONGLY SUPPORT. . . . . . . 7'?:
relocation of that Off-Sale Liquor SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47%
Store if the former site by the OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9a .
Stonehouse and Fire Station were STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . . 50
redeveloped? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . .320
Do you feel strongly that way?
As you may know, the Village of Saint Anthony also owns and
operates the Stonehouse Bar and Grill .
51 . In general, do you support or STRONGLY SUPPORT. . . . . .230
oppose the Village of Saint An- SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51%
thony operating municipal liquor OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8%
stores and using the profits to STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . . 3%
fund village services and pro- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 1601
grams? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you
feel strongly that way?
52 . And, in general, do you support or STRONGLY SUPPORT. . . . . . 12a
oppose the Village of Saint An- SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530
thony operating food and bar OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
establishments? (WAIT FOR RE- STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . .40
SPONSE) Do you feel strongly that DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 160
way?
There has been some discussion about changing Village ordinances
to allow Saint Anthony .to issue liquor licenses to restaurants in
the community. If this change were made, the Village would then
move to close the Stonehouse Bar.
53 . Would you support or oppose a STRONGLY SUPPORT. . . . . . 16a
referendum allowing the Village to SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4206
issue liquor licenses to rest- OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1306
aurants in the community? (WAIT STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . . 61
FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 230
that way?
The Village of Saint Anthony has traditionally not funded youth
recreation programs, including youth sports, from general revenue
sources . Instead, these programs have been funded from charit-
able gambling sources .
54 . If funds from charitable gambling NOTHING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-24o
sources were no longer available, $20 ..00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
how much would you be willing to $40 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
increase your property taxes to $60 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6%
fund youth recreation programs? $80 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4%
Let' s say, would you be willing $100 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3%
to increase yearly property taxes $120 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
by $ per year? (DEPENDING DON' T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . 280
ON RESPONSE, MOVE UP OR DOWN) REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7%
How about $ per year? (REPEAT
PROCESS)
Changing topics again. . . .
7
55 . Do you have a drain tile system at YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 _
your residence? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 _ 64
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 1 ::
IF "YES, " ASK: (N=100)
56 . Do you have a sump pump sys- YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72%
tem at your residence? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 1%
IF "YES, " ASK: (N=72)
57 . Are your drain tiles or YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18%
sump pump connected NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74%
directly to the sanitary DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 8%
sewers?
As you may know, several refuse haulers serve Saint Anthony.
People who are in favor of this arrangement feel it has permitted
citizens to choose their own -haulers and contract directly with
them. People opposed to it say it has also created significant
overlap between the hauler routes, substantial damage to streets,
and increased noise and congestion.
58 . Of the following three proposals, PROPOSAL A. . . . . . . . . : . . 51%
which do you favor the most : PROPOSAL B. . . . . . . . . . . . 16%
A. The present system; PROPOSAL C. . . . . . . . . . . . 13%
B. The Village assigns current INDIFFERENT. . . . . . . . . . . 12%
haulers to 'exclusively handle DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 9%
specific areas based on a
bidding process; OR
C. The Village designates one
hauler to serve the entire
community.
Changing topics once again. . .
59 . What is your principal source of information about Village
government and its activities?
UNSURE, 3%; VILLAGE NOTES, 5%; NEWSLETTER, 9%; CABLE
TELEVISION, 9%; SAINT ANTHONY BULLETIN, 36%; STAR TRIBUNE,
3%; NORTHEASTER, 10%; PEOPLE, 17%; FOCUS, 6%; SCATTERED,
2% .
Thinking about both the quality and the quantity of the informa-
tion you receive from the Village of Saint Anthony. . . .
60 . In general, do you receive too TOO MUCH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0%
much information from the Village ABOUT RIGHT AMOUNT. . . . 75%
of Saint Anthony, about the right TOO LITTLE. . . . . . . . . . . . 22%
amount, or too little information? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 3%
8
61 . Do you recall receiving the YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 :, c
newsletter, titled "Village NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 : J
Notes, " during the past year? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . .20
IF "YES, " ASK: (N=320)
62 . Do you or any members of your YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87%
household regularly read it? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 12%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . 1%
63 . How effective is this VERY EFFECTIVE. . . . . . . . 33%
newsletter in keeping you in- SOMEWHAT EFFECTIVE. . . . 53%
formed about activities in NOT TOO EFFECTIVE. . . . . 11%
St . Anthony, very effective, NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE. . . 0%
somewhat effective, not too DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 3%
effective, or not at all ef-
fective?
64 . Does your household currently re- YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610
ceive cable television? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39%
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0%
IF "YES, " ASK: (N=243)
65 . During the past six months, YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52%
have you watched local pro- NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .480
gramming on North Suburban DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 0%
Cable Channel 16?
66 . How many computers do you have in NONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38%
your home? ONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .440
TWO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
THREE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3%
FOUR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
FIVE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
SIX OR MORE. . . . . . . . . . . . 0%
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0%
IF "ONE" OR MORE, ASK: (N=249)
67 . Do you have access to the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87%
Internet? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 0%
68 . - Have you visited the Village of YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Saint Anthony' s webpage during NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830
the past year? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 5%
Thinking about the Saint Anthony-New Brighton Public Schools . . . .
69 . How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT. .. . . . . . . . . . . . 250
education provided by the Saint GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40%
Anthony-New Brighton Public ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Schools -- excellent, good, only POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
fair, or poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . 31%
9
I would like to ready you a list of statements others have told 66
US . For each one, please tell me whether you strongly agree,
agree, disagree, or strongly disagree . If you have don' t know,
just say so. . . .
STA AGR DIS STD DKR
70 . During the last few years, the
Saint -Anthony-New Brighton School
District Administration and
School Board have spent tax money
effectively and efficiently. 1001 380 50 1% 46%
71 . When the Saint Anthony-New Brigh-
ton School District asks voters
to approve a property tax increase,
it is only as a last resort after
the Administration and School Board
have considered all other budget
alternatives . 801 4301 7% 10 410
72 . The Saint Anthony-New Brighton
School .District has been honest
with residents about the ways in
which they spend tax money. 8% 44% 40 1% 44%
73 . I trust the Saint Anthony-New
Brighton School District School
Board and Administration to do
what is right for the children
in this district . 12% 5001 40 1% 33%
Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes. . . .
Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following
age groups live in your household. Let' s start oldest to young-
est, and be sure to include yourself . . . .
74 . First, persons 65 or over? NONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59%
ONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21%
TWO OR MORE. . . . . . . . . . . 20%
75 . Adults under 65? NONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34%
ONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 200
TWO. . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . .42%
THREE OR MORE. . . . . . . . . . 5%
76 . School-aged children, 5 to 18 NONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76%
years old? ONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9%
TWO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11%
THREE OR MORE. . . . . . . . . .4%
77 . Pre-schoolers? NONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93%
ONE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6%
TWO OR MORE. . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
10
78 . Do you own or rent your present OWN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 ��
residence? RENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2f; ,
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0`0
79 . What is your age, please? 18-24 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 2.
25-34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.
35-44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.
45-54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.
55-64 . . : . . . . . . . . . . . 15%
65 AND OVER. . . . . . . . . . . 351
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.
80 . What is your occupation and, if applicable, the occupation
of your spouse or partner?
PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL, 240; OWNER-MANAGER, 7 CLERICAL-
SALES, 13.; BLUE COLLAR, 16%; RETIREES, 37%; SCATTERED,
4-06 .
81 . Which of the following best des- SINGLE/NO OTHER. . . . . . . 32%
cribes your household: (READ) SINGLE PARENT. . . . . . . . . .4%
A. Single, no other family at MAR/PARTN/CHILDREN. . . . 2'6.
home . MAR/PARTN/NO CHILD. . . . 36%
B . Single parent with children at SOMETHING ELSE. .. . . . . . . . 1.
home . DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 01
C. Married or partnered, with
children at home .
D. Married or partnered with no
children or no children at home .
E. Something else .
82 . What is the last grade of formal HIGH SCHOOL OR LESS . . . . 6%
education you completed? HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE. . 21.
VO-TECH/TECH COLLEGE. . 10%,
SOME COLLEGE. . . . . .... . . . 15.
COLLEGE GRADUATE. . . . . . 32.
POST-GRADUATE . . . . . . . . . 16
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%
83 . Which of the following categories WHITE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95%
represents your ethnicity -- AFRICAN-AMERICAN. . . . . . .2%
White, African-American, Hispanic- HISPANIC-LATINO. . . . . . . . 10-6
Latino, Asian-Pacific Islander, ASIAN-PACIFIC ISLANDER. 1%
Native American, or something NATIVE AMERICAN. . . . . . . . 1%
else? (IF "SOMETHING ELSE, " ASK: ) SOMETHING ELSE. . . . . . . . . 0%
What would that be? MIXED/BI-RACIAL. . . . . . . . 0.
DON'T KNOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . 0%
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.
And now, for one final question, keeping in mind that your an-
swers are held strictly confidential . . . .
11
84 . Is your pre-tax yearly household UNDER $25, 000 . . . . . . . . . 11`>
income over or under $50, 000? $25, 001-$50, 000 . . . . . . . 25'. 68
IF "OVER, " ASK: $50, 001-$75, 000 . . . . . . . 15'?-
Is it over $75, 000? (IF "YES, " $75, 001-$100, 000 . . . . . . 10%
ASK: ) Is it over $100, 000? OVER $100, 000.. . . . . . . . . . 8%
IF "UNDER, " ASK: DON'T KNOW. . ; . . . . . . . . . . 3%
Is it under $25, 000? REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28%
85 Gender. (DO NOT ASK) - MALE. . . . . . . . . .49%
FEMALE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51%
86 . Region of City: PRECINCT 1 . (HENNEPIN) .28%
PRECINCT 2 . (HENNEPIN) .4101
PRECINCT 3 . (RAMSEY) . . . 30%
12
January 15, 2002
11I C FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues
January 24/25 Goal setting
January 29 Special Joint meeting with School
February 5 Special Interview prospective developers for Apache area
February 12 Regular Public hearing on 2002 street improvements(3
resolutions)
Res. calling for sale of bonds
Ord.,requires business licenses for therapeutic
massage businesses(31 reading)
Prosser Review developers for Apache
Mike Larson Annual liquor report for 2001
February 26 Regular Prosser Financial strategies
Planning Commission report
March 12 Regular Jay Hartman Annual Public Works report for 2001
Res.,Award sale of bonds for 2002 street
improvements
Preview of Board of Review
March 26 Regular
April 9 Regular Board of Review
Dick Engstrom Annual Police report for 2001
Joel Hewitt Annual Fire report for 2001
April 23 Regular
May 14 Regular Roger Larson Annual Finance report for 2001
Stormwater Fund - Cash on Hand 121312001
Projeted
Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $1,573,370.60
MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $935,008.45
DNR $4,000,000.00 $2,935,870.97
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Storm Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $509,556.32
Storm Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1.594.271.55
Total Project Budget $9,610,000.00 $8,398,077.89
Other Project Activity.
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75
HRA-Streetscape Transfer $0.00 $155,100.00
Met Council $20,000.00 $10,000.00
Water Connection Fee-29th Avenue $26,800.00 $6,700.00
Stormwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $87,445.12
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
29th Avenue-Water Connection Fees $26,000.00 $13,100.00
Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 $38.877.50
Total Revenues $9,963,800.00 $9,025,316.53
12/312001
Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Dat
WSB-Engineering Services $342,910.40
Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $22,721.39
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025.00
Purchase of Flood Homes $939,166.64
Pahl Avenue Ponding $107,438.69
Flood Relief Grant Program $62,509.79
Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master $17,371.44
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,032,032.10
2000 Street Improvement Project $2,624,604.02
2001 Street Improvement Project $1,583,796.48
2002 Street Improvement Project $37,196.64
Harding Street Holding Ponds $709,269.00
Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1.521.134.99
Total Expenditures $9,005,132.57
Project Balance $20,183.96
Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $203,362.66
EXPENDRURE REPORT 12131/2001
WSB: Flood Relief Gram Program: 2001 Street Improvement Project
Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Expenditures Project Description:
Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennis/Penny Gault $10,000.00 WSB-Engineering Services $213,956.22
Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00 Lillie Suburban Newspapers $38.75
Stormwater Task Force $29,243.00 Thomas/Susan Hoban $400.00 Hage Concrete Works $1,400.00
Stormwater Engineering $35,806.66 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00 Olson's Plumbing $221.90
Flood Problem Analysis $27,819.98 _ Castle Building 8 Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Sandness Construction $4,650.00
MCES Grant Application $1,724.25 LN.Soiling-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00 Bond Issuance $21,183.48
DNR/FEMA Grants $11,661.48 J 8 D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 Park Construction $1.342.346.13
Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 SL Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00 Total 2001 Street Project $1,583,798.48
Park Design $154,883.10 RiteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00
III Study $26,331.00 Pine Cone Nursery-'3480 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 2002 Street Improvement Project
Flood Grant-1998/1999120002001 S27,04 Lamere Concrete-Flood Proofing Improvement $4,412.00 Project Description:
Total WSB 5342,910.40 McCaren Designs,Inc. $703.99 WSB-Engineering Services $30,635.75
Minnehaha Falls Landscaping $5,587.50 Dorsey 8 Whitney $709.69
Ban Engineering: Twin Cities Glass Block $1.312.50 Pipe Services Corp. 55.851.20
Project Description: Total Flood Relief Program $62,509.79 Total 2002 Street Project $37,196.64
District#6 Watershed Study 52.709.35
Taal Ban Engineering $2,709.35 Private Hones-DumpateraBervlce Master
Project Description: Harding Street Holding Ponds
Dorsey 8 Whitney: Waste Management $391.65 Project Description: Expenditure s
Project Descriptim: Service Master $13,782.29 WSB-Engineering Services $104,005.15
Legal Services for Flooding Issues $17,911.16 Nancy Myhran $259.50 Bettendod Rohrer $30,075.00
Legal Services-Comdenation of Homes $1,930.00 Linda Gonler $198.00 Second Nature Lawn 5228,168.92
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue S2,890.23 Susan Kozarek. $925.00 Residential Easements $265,000.00
Total Dorsey 8 Whitney $22,721.39 Elaine Nelsen $1,065.00 Dorsey 8 Whtt ey/Legal $29,906.47
Sue Wenker $250.00 STS Consultants $3,235.00
Water Ouallty Study: Berkley Risk/Insuance Claim-Payment 5500. Evergreen land Services_ $19,519.66
Silver Lake: Total Dumpsters $17,371.44 Construction Bulliten $358.48
Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Albrecht Inc. $20,215.22
Sump Pump Comdemnadon Commissioners $8,455.10
Purchase of Homes: Project Description: Old Republic-Abstract Fees S2,
Project Description: Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Une $131.00 Total Harding Street Holding Ponds $709,269.00
Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement St ts.s4 .
Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Total Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64 Silver Point ParklConstructlon
Demolition $9,156.00 Project Description:
Taxes $839.61 1999 Street Improvement Project Richard Knutson,Inc, $1,466,031.72'
Legal Services-Dorsey 8 Whitney $225.00 Project Description: Sandness Construction $15,4781.00
Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $365.00 WSB-Engineering Services $173,970.02 Muska Electric $29,442.17
Seal 8 Cap Well $1,450.00 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Trillium Park $10.183.10
Purchase of 2713 SL Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Nonhdale Construction $834,979.40 Total Silver Point Park $1,521,134.99
Demolition $11,258.00 Treemendous $460.00
Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Dorsey 8 Whitney 52,911.55
Recording Deed/Taxes $2,506.98 Bond Issuance Expense S10,875.28
Title Insurance 5946.00 Total 1999 Street Project $1,032,032.10
Seal 8 Cap Well $1,420.00
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 2000 Street Improvement Project
Purchase of 27002704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45 Project Description:
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $208,072.00 WSB-Engineering Services $298,231.43
First American Title $375.00 Barbarossa 8 Sons,Inc. $2,098,522.25
Evergreen Land Services 53.369.47 E-CEL Energy 5155,100.00
Total Purchase of Homes $939,168.64 Buchan Environmental Services $2,248.99
Beckley Risk Services $10,000.00
Pahl Avenue Ponding: AhState Insurance Company $312.78
Project Description: St.Paul Companies $16,884.96
WSB-Engineering Services $20,967.16 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93
G 8 L Construction $66,498.54 Albrecht,Inc. $891.75
Treemendous $14,460.90 Fabyanske 8 Westra-Legal CosVI.Agation $5,035.70
Pipe Services $3,859.20 Bond Issuance Expense 539.143.23
Construction Bulliten $1,432.20 Total 2000 Street Project $2,624,604.02
Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement 5220.69
Total Pahl Avenue Ponding $107,438.69
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: December 2001
Expenditures: Mean Average
100%
12/31/2001 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Spent Budget
Mayor/Council $53,000.00 $56,576.56 -$3,576.56 107% -7%
Intergovernmental Relations $19,500.00 $15,350.00 $4,150.00 79% 21%
Cable Franchise $18,000.00 $14,841.65 $3,158.35 82% 18%
General Management $93,000.00 $108,658.40 -$15,658.40 117% -17%
Elections $16,400.00 $16,332.03 $67.97 100% 0%
Finance/Insurance $212,400.00 $209,371.31 $3,028.69 99% 1%
Finance/Assessing $36,500.00 $36,891.10 -$391.10 101% _1%
Legal $58,400.00 $73,178.74 -$14,778.74 125% -25%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,700.00 $526.04 $2,173.96 19% 81%
City Buildings $104,600.00 $100,858.52 $3,741.48 96% 4%
Civil Defense $40,400.00 $38,288.32 $2,111.68 95% 5%
Police Protection $983,600.00 $988,195.43 -$4,595.43 100% 0%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $491,200.00. $493,356.94 -$2,156.94 100% 0%
Fire Protection $527,975.00 $497,246.43 $30,728.57 94% 6%
Inspections/Building Permits $69,800.00 $74,707.58 -$4,907.58 107% -7%
Animal Control $3,400.00 $2,110.10 $1,289.90 62% 38%
Public Works $367,800.00 $359,398.51 $8,401.49 98% 2%
Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $103,700.00 $100,393.10 $3,306.90 97% 3%
Tree and Weed Care $25,400.00 $19,232.19 $6,167.81 76% 24%
Parks $105,100.00 $114,028.82 -$8,928.82 108% -8%
Transfers to other Funds $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $0.00 100% 0%
Budget Reserves/Non Budgeted $112,000.00 $4,401.16, $107,598.84 4% 96%
Total Expenditures $3,519,875.00 $3,398,942.93 $120,932.07 97% 3%
Unaudited: (Does not include)
1) Accruals - 2001 expenditures/paid in 2002
2) Dare Salary Transfer- Reduces expenses
3) Recycling Transfer- Reduces expenses
4)Audit Adjustments - Could increase/decrease expenses
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 12/31/2001
Interest Date
13REMER-ST ANTHONY BANK Bate Purchased may Book Value
INVESTMENT DEMAND-MONEY MARKET SAVINGS 2.00% 1 DAY LIQUIDITY(SWEEP) $118,964.32
41M GENERAL
$431,000 SUNBELT FUNDING COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.70% 12118101 03112102 . $429,320.54
$578,000 LOCKHART FUNDING COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.709/6, 12/20/01 04/15/02 $574,889.72
$1,400,000 FHLMC MEDIUM NOTE-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 08/09/01 08/27/31 $134,373.51
$1,138,583.77
41M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 02/03199 02/24/14 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03103199 03103114 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.46% 05/12199 01/08/08 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-COUPON 6.00% 11/01/01 11/28116 $200,000.00
$800,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 01/12199 01/28/19 $202,057.98
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.209/0 01/12/99 01/28/19 $126,286.24
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 8.120/o 09109/99 07/14/17 $48,312.00
$500,000 FMNA MEDIUM NOTE-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 06/12/99 03/23118 $146,062.50
$1,225,000 FED HOME LONE BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.009/6 09/24/01 10/18/21 $309,401:28
$1,250,000 FED HOME LONE BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 11/07/01 02/22/29 $191,662.50
$385,000 FOUNTAIN SQUARE COMM PAPER PARKS 1.709/6 12/20/01 03/15/02 $383,481.92
$436,000 TANNEHILL CAPITAL COMM PAPER PARKS 1.7031/6 .12/20/01 04/18/02 $433,593.16
$2,440,857.58
DAIN RAUSCHER
-GENERAL
GNMA POOL 4734 8.50°/6 02101/75 01/15/05 $237.89
GNMA POOL 6472 7.500/6 07/01!75 07/15/05 $995.51
GNMA POOL 14376 7.500/. 03/01/77 03115/07 $2,130.89
GNMA POOL 23364 9.009/6 09/01178 09/15108 $1,222.77
GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01178 11/15108 $2,253.37
$452,000 GEN ELECTRIC COMMERCIAL PAPER 2.187% 10/24/01 01/15102 $449,768.50
$446,000 GEN ELECTRIC COMMERCIAL PAPER 2.1809/6 10/24/01 02/15102 $442,987.81
$552,000 GEN ELECTRIC COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.777% 12128/01 03/12/02 $550,018.32
$1,449,615.06
DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL
$125,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.041% 11/16/99 07/14117 $31,076.25
$100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12115/99 03/08/29 $10,105.00
$130,000 FNMA-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.30% 06/01/00 08/02/18 $29,555.30
$341,000 GEN ELECTRIC COMMMERCIAL PAPER PARKS 2.1649/6 10/24/01 01/15102 $339,334.78
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03103/99 03/03/14 $200,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.009/6 07/15/99 02/24/14 $193,700.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.25% 6.25% 12118101 12/27/16 $200,000.00
$95,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.00°/6 6.00°/6 12128/01 01/17/17 $95,000.00
$1,098,771.33
DEAN WITTER
$43,000.00 FICO FED STRIP SERIES 1 7.479% 11/09/94 05111/02 $24,781.96
$500,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/29/98 08/20/18 $128,730.00
$1,200,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/21/98 09/10/18 $307,538.40
$550,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE 7.950% 11/24199 06/22/18 $129,228.00
$680,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 7.10% 06115/01 04/05/19 $97,722.56
$535,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 7.493% 07/09/01 02102123 $109,514.50
$220,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 7.011% 07/19/01 08/20/18 $67,782.00
Timet/18/2002 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT DECEMBER 20011NVESTI
DEAN WITTER ( .nntin uedl
$44,000.00 CONSECO BANK-C/D PARKS 6.65% 11/01/00 05101/02 $441000.00
$45,000.00 CONSECO BANK SALT LAKE-CID PARKS 2.47% 12/28!01 04/11/02 $44,199.99
$95,000.00 WESTERN BANK -C/D PARKS 2.45% 12/26/01 06/26/02 $95,000.00
$250,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-CALLABLE 6.31% 02/26%01 03126/18 $248,923.61
$200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6.00°/6 11/14/01 11/14/16 $200,000.00
$200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-SEMI 6.00% .11/19/01 11/19/21 $197,000.00
$200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-STEP UP 6.50% 12/28/01 12115116 $200,000.00
$1,894,421.02
DEAN WITTER
$636,000 GEN ELECTRIC COMMERCIAL PAPER- TAX ABATEMENT 1.941% 12/31/01 05/17/02 $631,401.36
DAIN RAUCHER-(HRAI
$200,000 FNMA-9334 P/0 7.24% 04/20/93 03/25/23 $29,475.00
$200,000 GSIF FRMAC SER 11 66.69/6 7.00% 04/20/93 04/20/08 $60,798.34
$100,000 FRMAC SER 11 MPRG 33.3 7.00% 01/25/94 01/25/09 $34,973.06
$50,000 FHLMC MCB SER 1629MB 7.00% 02/07/94 01/15/23 $42,034.07
$200,000-FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 04/25/01 02104/09 $250,000.00
$225,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00°/6 08/21/01 09/13/10 $225,000.00
$500,000-FHLB MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.11% 6.11% 09/26/01 09/26/11 $504,091.30
$250,000-FHLMC MEDIUM SERIES 3B/E 6.00% 6.00°/6 10125/01 10/15/16 $250,000.00
$100,000-FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6.00% 6.00% 11/14/01 12/07/16 $100,000.00
$200,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 11/16/01 11/29/21 $198,574.00
$300,000-FNMA MEDIUM TERM ZERO COUPON 7.200/6 05/23/01 05/07/18 $99,562.70
$1,000,000-FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-ZERO COUPON 7.751/o 12/27/01 12/27/21 $218,563.80
.'$ 75,000-SYNERGY BANK-CERT OF DEPOSIT 2.400/o 12131/01 02/22/02 $75,000.00
$ 78,000-SANTA BARBARA-CERT OF DEPOSIT 2.25% 12/31/01 02/26/02 $78,000.00
$100,000-MBNA BANK NEWARK-CERT OF DEPOSIT 2.35% 12/26/01 03/26/02 $100,000.00
$100,000-BANK OF OKLAHOMA-CERT OF DEPOSIT 2.50% 12128/01 03/28/02 $100.000.00
$2,366,072.27
TOTAL BOOK VALUE $11,138,686.71
Time1/16/2002 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT DECEMBER 20011NVESTI
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
January 22, 2002
Call to Order
Roll Call
1. Approval of January 22, 2002 H.R.A. Agenda
11. Consent Agenda
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
1. Approve January 8, 2002 H.R.A. Minutes. Action requested. (p. 1 - 2)
2. Claims. Action requested. (p.3)
111. General Policy Business of the H.R.A.
IV. Staff Reports
V. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments
VI. Information and Announcements
IX. Adjournment
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
4
5 . January 8, 2002
6
7 CALL TO ORDER
8 Chair Hodson called the meeting to order at 9:53 p.m.
9
10 ROLL CALL.
11 Commissioners present: Chair Hodson; Commissioners Sparks,Thuesen,Horst, and Faust.
12 Commissioners absent: None.
13 Also present: Executive Director Michael Mornson and City Attorney Jerome
14 Gilligan.
15
16 I. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 8,2002 H.R.A. AGENDA.
17 Motion by Commissioner Sparks to approve the January 8, 2002 Housing and Redevelopment
18 Authority Agenda as presented.
19
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21
22 I1. CONSENT AGENDA.
23 Motion by Commissioner Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda, which consisted of:
24
25 1. Approve December 11, 2001 H.R.A. Minutes.
26 2. Claims.
27 3. Resolutions (these are annual "housekeeping"resolutions).
28 A. 001-Designate H.R.A. Chair.
29 B. 002-Designate H.R.A. Vice Chair.
30 C. 003-Designate H.R.A. Secretary/Treasurer.
31 D. 004-Designate H.R.A. Commissioners.
32
33 Motion carried unanimously.
34
35 Commissioner Horst was designated as secretary of the H.R.A.
36
37 II. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
38 1. H.R.A. Resolution 02-006, re: Amend Tax Increment Finance Fund.
39 Motion by Commissioner Thuesen to approve Resolution 02-006,re: Amend Tax
40 Increment Finance Fund.
41
42 Motion carried unanimously.
43
44 2. H.R.A. Resolution 02-005, re: Approve purchase of 4004 Silver Lake Road.
45 Motion by Commissioner Sparks to approve Resolution 02-005, re: Approve the
46 purchase of 4004 Silver Lake Road.
47
48 Motion carried unanimously.
49
z
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes
January 8,2002
Page 2
1 IV. STAFF REPORTS.
2 None.
3 .
4 V. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
5 None.
6
7 VI. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
8 None.
9
10 VII. ADJOURNMENT.
11 Motion by Commissioner Faust to adjourn the meeting at 9:58 p.m.
12
13 Motion carried unanimously.
14
15 Respectfully submitted,
16 Courtney Seesz
17 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
18
3
Following are the verified claims for the January 22, 2002 (JIRA)
1. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. ..............................$1,162.37
S/W Quadrant Study
2. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. ..............................$3,187.50
N/W Quadrant Study
3. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. ..............................$1,012.50
Goal Setting/Stonehouse/TIF Meeting
4. JMS Communications & Research ..................... $990.00
N/W Quadrant Redevelopment
5. Springsted, Inc. ............................................ $200.00
Continuing Disclosure/Apache Bonds
6. US Bank. ..............................................$208,367.50
Community Center/Bond Payment