HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 07272004 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
102932
Box: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 07272004
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Our Mission is to be progressive and livable community,
a walkable village, which is safe and secure.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
July 27, 2004
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the following items:
I. Approval of the June 27, 2004, City Council Meeting Agenda. (Action requested.)
II. Proclamations and Recognitions.
A. Proclamation declaring August 3, 2004, as National Night Out. (pp. 1)
(Action requested)
III.- Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve July 13, 2004, Regular Council Meeting minutes. (pp. 2-12)
B. Licenses and Permits. (pp. 13-14)
C. Claims. (pp. 15-16)
IV. Public Hearings.
V. Reports from Planning Commission. Jan Jensen will be present.
A. Resolution 04-053 — 3200 Skycroft Drive side yard setback variance. (Action
requested.) (pp. 17-24)
B. Resolution 04-054 — 2800 — 34th Avenue, front yard setback variance. (Action
requested.) (pp. 25-33)
C. Resolution 04-055 — 2250 St. Anthony Blvd, Sunset Memorial Park,
monument sign variance for (a) second sign and (b)for sign height. (Action
requested.) (pp. 34-40)
•
n
it
PRO CLAMA TION
WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NAM is sponsoring a unique,
nationwide crime and drug prevention program on August 3, 2004, called
"National Night Out", and
WHEREAS, the "21st Annual National Night Out"provides a unique opportunity for St.
Anthony to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country in
promoting cooperative,police-community crime and drug prevention efforts; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony plays a vital role in assisting the St. Anthony Police
Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in St. Anthony and is
supporting "National Night Out 2004"locally; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of the City of St. Anthony be aware of the
importance of crime prevention programs and impact that their participation can
have on reducing crime and drug abuse in the City of St. Anthony; and
WHEREAS, police-community partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and
cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out"program.
OW, THEREFORE, we, the St. Anthony City Council, do hereby call upon all citizens of the
City of St. Anthony to join the St. Anthony Police Department and the National Association of
Town Watch in supporting "21st Annual National Night Out"on August 3, 2004.
URTHER, LET IT BE RESOL VED, THAT WE, THE ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL, do
hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 3, 2004 as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT"in the City of St.
nthony.
ayor
Ate
A
l SB
1\l'`
II�
1l'
&Associates,lire.
a tl
July 27, 2004
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Michael Morrison
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418-1603
Re: Resolution for Phase II: 39th Avenue Street and Utility Improvement Project
St. Anthony Village, MN
WSB Project No. 1065-85
Dear Mr. Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
Attached for your consideration is a resolution Awarding a Bid for Phase II: 39th Avenue Street
s y,. and Utility Improvements. This resolution awards the contract for the Phase II: 39th Avenue
street reconstruction project to the lowest bidder. A tabulation of these bidders, as well as the
1 low bidder of Forest Lake Contractors, Inc. with a bid amount of$628,714.00 is attached.
If you have any questions, I will be present at the July 27, 2004 Council Meeting to discuss the
bids with you or please call me at 763-287-7182.
Sincerely,
WSB do Associates, Inc.
7o ///c
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Associate
1' Attachments
415'0 Olson
Memorial Highway
Suite 300
Minneapolis
+Minnesota
55422
. � f
763.541.4800
7634541.1700 FAX F:\WP WIN\1065-93\Resolutions\072704 Mayor City Staff.doc
i Minneapolis• St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer
71\
Abstract Of Bids Page I of 3
A 7/27/2004
WSB
&Associated bx.
WSB
Bid Tabulation
Phase II: 39th Avenue
Project Name: Construction Contract No.:
Client: St Anthony Village Project No.: 01065-93
Bid Opening: 7/23/200410:00:00 AM Owner: Minneapolis
Item No. Item Units Quantity Unit Price ITotalPrice Unit Price I Total Price Unit Price, Total Price
Project:01065-93-Phase II:39th Avenue Construction I Engineers Material Table I Forest Lake Contracting,Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corporation
SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
1 2021:501 MOBILIZATION(5%) LUMP SUM 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00
2 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 745 $5.00 $3,725.00 $4.00 $2,980.00 $3.80 $2,831.00
3 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SO FT 600 $3.00 $1,800.00 $1.00 $600.00 $1.00 $600.00
4 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SO YD 1753 $2.25 $3,944.25 $3.00 $5,259.00 $1.50 $2,629.50
5 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 240 $4.50 $1,080.00 $4.00 $960.00 $3.15 $756.00
6 2104.601 CLEAN UP LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00
7 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 2200 $6.00 $13,200.00 $9.00 $19,800.00 $12.00 $26,400.00
8 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(CV)(P) CU YD 4040 $13.00 $52,520.00 $12.00 $48,480.00 $12.90 $52,116.00
9 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V SO YD 11000 $1.75 $19,250:00 $1.50 $16,500.00 $1.00 $11,000.00
10 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5(100%CRUSHED) TON 7025 $15.00 $105,375.00 $14.00 $98,350.00 $13.85 $97,296.25
11 2301.603 PERMANENT TERMINAL HEADERS LIN FT 80 $45.00 $3,600.00 $75.00 $6,000.00 $85.00 $6,800.00
12 2301.604 CONCRETE PAVEMENT(SPECIAL) SO YD 720 $100.00 $72,000.00 $70.00 $50,400.00 $80.00 $57,600.00
13 2340.510 TYPE 41 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON 1170 $33.00 $38,610.00 $38.00 $44,460.00 $39.75 $46,507.50
14 2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 1680 $32.00 $53,760.00 $36.00 $60,480.00 $37.20 $62,496.00
15 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 500 $2.50 $1,250.00 $3.00 $1,500.00 $1.95 $975.00
16 2502.521 6"PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 1420 $7.00 $9,940.00 $7.00 $9,940.00 $9.00 $12,780.00
17 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 22 $150.00 $3,300.00 $300.00 $6,600.00 $150.00 $3,300.00
18 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME&RING CASTING(SANITARY) EACH 1 $250.00 $250.00 $500.00 $500.00 $275.00 $275.00
19 2506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING CATCH BASIN EACH 17 $30.00 $510.00 $200.00 $3,400.00 $395.00 $6,715.00
20 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 1390 $15.00 $20,850.00 $10.00 $13,900.00 $12.00 $16,680.00
21 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER DESIGN B612(MODIFIED) LIN FT 1960 $20.001 $39,200.001 $18.001 $35,280.00 $20.50 $40,180.00
http://wsb4/RtAEC/Reports/rpLAbstract.,asp?WorkOrderID=2267 7/27/2004
Abstract Of Bids Page 2 of 3
22 2531.60317"CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER LIN FT 970 1 $28.00 $27,160.00 $10.00 $9,700.00 $13.00 $12,610.00
23 2545.523 2"NON-METALLIC CONDUIT LIN FT 2800 $5.50 $15,400.00 $6.00 $16,800.00 $5.50 $15,400.00
24 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
25 2564.602 FURNISH TYPE C SIGN EACH 118.5 $25.00 $2,962.50 $30.00 $3,555.00 $29.55 $3,501.68
26 2565.602 SPECIAL HANDHOLE EACH 12 $30.00 $360.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,100.00 $13,200.00
27 2564.603 4"DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPDXY LIN FT 2345 $1.20 $2,814.00 $0.60 $1,407.00 $0.67 $1,571.15
28 2564.603112"SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPDXY LIN FT 130 $2.50 $325.00 $4.50 $585.00 $5.00 $650.00
29 2564.603 4"SOLID LINE WHITE-EPDXY LIN FT 5000 $0.60 $3,000.00 $1.00 $5,000.00 $1.07 $5,350.00
30 2564.603 12"SOLID LINE WHITE-EPDXY LIN FT 630 $2.50 $1,575.00 $5.00 $3,150.00 $5.56 $3,502.80
31 2564.603 24"SOLID LINE WHITE-EPDXY LIN FT 160 $5.00 $800.00 $7.00 $1,120.00 $7.78 $1,244.80
32 2565.616 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM SYSTEM 1 $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $18,000.001 $18,000.00
33 2573.602 INLET PROTECTION EACH 21 1 $75.00 $1,575.001 $50.001 $1,050.00 $120.00 $2,520.00
34 12575.505 1 SODDING,TYPE LAWN(INCL.TOPSOIL&FERT.) ISO YD 800 $4.00 $3,200.001 $4.001 $3,200.00 $7.00 $5,600.00
Total SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS:1 1$553,335.751 $540,456.00 $562,887.68
SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
35 2104.525 ABANDON MANHOLE EACH 1 $300.00 $300.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $500.00
36 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE(SANITARY) LIN FT 140 $6.00 $840.00 $32.00 $4,480.00 $11.00 $1,540.00
37 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 $2,555.00 $5,110.00
38 2503.603 10"PVC PIPE SEWER-SDR 26 LIN FT 50 $40.00 $2,000.00 $230.00 $11,500.00 $175.00 $8,750.00
39 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH 9 $250.00 $2,250.00 $200.00 $1,800.00 $167.00 $1,503.00
40 12503.603 1 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER LIN FT 50 $5.00 $250.00 $10.00 $500.001 $11.00 $550.00
41 2506.516 1 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 9 $400.00 $3,600.00 $700.00 $6,300.00 $535.00 $4,815.00
42 12506.603 1 CONST 48"DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE LIN FT 23.92 $200.00 $4,784.00 $200.00 $4,784.00 $200.00 $4,784.00
Total SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $16,424.00 $31,964.00 $27,552.00
SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
43 2504.602 RELOCATE HYDRANT AND VALVE EACH 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,850.00 $1,850.00
44 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $800.00 $800.00 $555.00 $555.00
45 2504.60316"WATER MAIN,D.I.P.,CL 52 W/POLY WRAP LIN FT 12 $35.00 $420.00 $35.00 $420.00 $45.00 $540.00
Total SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS: $2,920.00 $4,220.00 $2,945.00
SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
46 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE(STORM) LIN FT 237 $15.00 $3,555.00 $20.00 $4,740.00 $11.00 $2,607.00
47 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE EACH 6 $200.00 $1,200.00 $400.00 $2,400.00 $167.00 $1,002.00
48 2451.602 GRANULAR FOUNDATION AND/OR BEDDING TON 100 $20.00 $2,000.00 $8.00 $800.00 $18.00 $1,800.00
49 2503.541 15'RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 63 $30.00 $1,890.00 $40.00 $2,520.00 $41.00 $2,583.00
50 2503.541 24"RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 192 $36.00 $6,912.00 $50.00 $9,600.00 $49.00 $9,408.00
51 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 $600.00 $2.400.001 $500.00 $2,000.00
52 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 LIN FT 11.75 $275.00 $3,231.25 $600.00 $7,050.00 $225.00 $2,643.75
53 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 54-4020 LIN FT 17.28 $300.00 $5,184.00 $650.00 $11,232.00 $295.00 $5,097.60
54, 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN H LIN FT 3.33 $225.00 $749.25 $400.00 $1,332.00 $211.00 $702.63
55 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY(CATCHBASIN) EACH 21 $450.00 $9,450.00 $400.00 $8,400.00 $650.00 $13,650.00
56 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY(MANHOLE) EACH 4 $350.00 $1,400.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 $426.00 $1,704.00
Total SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $36,771.50 1 $62,074.001 $43,197.98
http://wsb4/RtAEC/Reports/rpt_Abstract.asp?WorkOrderID=2267 7/27/2004
Abstract Of Bids Page 3 of 3
Total SCHEDULE A-SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS: $553,335.75 $540,456.00 $562,887.68
Total SCHEDULE B-SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $16,424.00 $31,964.00 $27,552.00
Total SCHEDULE C-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS: $2,920.00 $4,220.00 $2,945.00
Total SCHEDULE D-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $36,771.50 $52,074.00 $43,197.98
Totals for Project 01065-93 1 1$609,451-25 $628,714.00 $636,582.66
%of Estimate for Project 01065-93 1 3.16% 41
I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.
Certified By: /r,�/� / Registration No.
Date:
http://wsb4/RtAEC/Reports/rpt_Abstract.asp?WorkOrderID=2267 7/27/2004
• PUBLIC HEARING AND/OR OPEN FORUM
PLEASE SIGN BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK AT A PUBLIC
HEARING AND/OR OPEN FORUM ON
Name Address
Jo- e- M a r e 2-7 111 vv` r� A- '
1'
D. Resolution 04-056— 3301 Silver Lake Road, City of St. Anthony, electronic
monument sign (a) for a conditional use permit, (b) variance for sign height,
and (c) variance for copy surface area. (Action requested.) (pp. 41-53)
VI. General Policy Business of the Council
A. Resolution 04-057;Award bid for phase II: 39th Avenue street and utility
improvements; Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Inc. will be present. (Action
requested.) (pp. 54)
B. Resolution 04-058; Funding for the electronic sign. (Action requested.)
(pp. 55-57)
C. Ordinance 04-004; Section 515, Dogs, Allowing three (3) dogs per household
and changing immunization requirements. (3`d reading) (Action requested.)
(pp. 58-59)
D. Ordinance 04-005; Review and Amend Ordinance 1210.03 — Keeping of
Certain Animal. (Action requested.) (pp. 60-61)
E. Resolution 04-059; Calling for a Legislative Special Session to resolve LGA
issues. (Action requested.) (pp. 62-66)
VII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers.
VIII. Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda.
Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the
podium, state their name and address for the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes.
Generally;the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically
refer the matter to staff for a future report of direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IX. Information and Announcements..
X. Miscellaneous Informational Documents.
XI. Adjournment.
01
Vila
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NAM is sponsoring a unique,
nationwide crime and drug prevention program on August 3, 2004, called
"National Night Out", and
WHEREAS, the "21st Annual National Night Out"provides a unique opportunity for St.
Anthony to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country in
promoting cooperative,police-community crime and drug prevention efforts; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony plays a vital role in assisting the St. Anthony Police
Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in St. Anthony and is
supporting "National Night Out 2004"locally; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of the City of St. Anthony be aware of the
importance of crime prevention programs and impact that their participation can
have on reducing crime and drug abuse in the City of St. Anthony; and
WHEREAS, police-community partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and
cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out"program.
OW, THEREFORE, we, the St. Anthony City Council, do hereby call upon all citizens of the
City of St. Anthony to join the St. Anthony Police Department and the National Association of
Town Watch in supporting "21st Annual National Night Out"on August 3, 2004.
URTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL, do
ereby proclaim Tuesday, August 3, 2004 as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT"in the City of St.
nthony.
Mayor
Date
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 02
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 July 13, 2004
6
7 CALL TO ORDER
8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
9
10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Thuesen,Horst, Stille, and Faust.
15 Absent: None.
16 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson.
17
18 CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 1. APPROVAL OF JULY 13,2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
22 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to Approve the City
23 Council Meeting Agenda of July 13, 2004.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27 H. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
28 None.
29
30 111. CONSENT AGENDA.
31 A. Approve June 22, 2004 regular Council meeting minutes.
32 B. Consider licenses and permits.
33 C. Consider payment of claims.
34 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to Approve the Consent
35 Agenda.
36
37 Motion carried unanimously.
38
39 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
40 None.
41
42 V. REPORTS.
43 A. Resolution 04-052; Approving the City of St. Anthony 2003 Audit and Financial Report.
44 Stuart Bonniwell, CPA, and Roger Larson, Finance Director,presenting_
45 Stuart Bonniwell, CPA, reviewed for the Council the 2003 Audit Report. He reported financial
46 activities of the City were significant in 2003. He indicated significant financial events started
47 with severe state revenue reductions and this impact on the City's operating budget, the closing
48 of liquor operations, issuance of six types of bonds, commencement of renovation of public
49 works facilities,plans for construction of afire station and continuing re-development efforts of
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 03
July 13, 2004
Page 2
1 certain properties. He added included is the implementation of the new reporting standards
2 required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34 (GASB 34). He
3 indicated this statement changed drastically the method of presenting the financial statements
4 and activities of the City.
5
6 Mr. Bonniwell indicated the emphasis of GASB 34 is reporting the City as a whole with an
7 added focus on major funds of the City. He noted it involves the conversion of traditional
8 underlying financial operating statements into a single statement of net assets depending on type
9 of activity; governmental or business. He stated the conversion process involves the reporting of
10 capital assets (less accumulated depreciation),recognition of long-term debt (bonds payable) and
11 other reconciling items. He added the statement of activities summarizes expenditures by
12 function, or program of major activities of the City, and how they are financed. He reported
13 statements of proprietary funds remain unchanged as these statements were previously prepared
14 on the accrual method of accounting.
15
16 Mr. Bonniwell continued in stating as previously noted, GASB 34 focuses on reporting of the
17 City as a whole,however,the importance of individual funds and their activities remain the
18 critical factor since GASB 34 reporting basis starts with the underlying financial statements. He
19 indicated traditional accounting standards are still utilized in accounting for activities of the City.
20 He noted individual fund financial statements are contained within the new reporting format,
21 although if the fund is determined to be a major fund, it is listed separately rather than with its
22 fund type.
23
24 Mr. Bonniwell indicated his report; dated April 28, 2004 expresses an unqualified report on the
25 basic financial statements of the City as prepared in accordance with the provisions of GASB 34.
26 He indicated the following comments or observations are for Council's information and
27 consideration based on the audit of the financial statements of the City of St. Anthony for the
28 year ended December 31, 2003.
29
30 Mr. Bonniwell presented a financial summary for the Council noting the financial condition of
31 the City continues to remain strong. He reported as presented in the financial report,the City
32 reported a change in net assets of$970,000 (after capitalization of capital assets and related
33 depreciation). He indicated the governmental, operating funds of the City, consist of the General
34 Fund, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Project funds remain healthy. He added the
35 City's proprietary funds, liquor and utility, are also financially strong.
36
37 Mr. Bonniwell presented a summary of fund balances,by fund category, as of December 31 for
38 each of the past three years to include the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debit Services
39 Funds, Capital Project Funds and Enterprise Funds.
40
41 Mr. Bonniwell continued in reporting the City's financial condition has not changed significantly
42 over the past several years. He noted the large increase in the fund balance of the Capital Project
43 Funds is the result of bond proceeds for the renovation and construction of public facilities which
44 were unexpended at year end.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 04
July 13, 2004
Page 3
1 Mr. Bonniwell continued in presenting a summary of significant activities of the fund categories,
2 which included:
3
4 General Fund - The fund balance of the General Fund at December 31,2003 is
5 $1,142,047. For the year ended December 31, 2003,revenues and transfers exceeded
6 expenditures by$25,645 increasing its fund balance by this amount. The balance of the
7 General Fund represents approximately 30%of the operating budget for 2004. The fund
8 balance of the General Fund is designated or reserved for Working Capital, Insurance
9 (Self-insurance program), Public Safety Contract Reserves, Prepaid Insurance and Other
10 Matters.
11
12 The major portion of the fund balance, $977,464, has been designated for working capital
13 purposes. This reserve provides financing of current operations until tax settlements and
14 state aids are received. This reserve also serves as a safeguard against potential revenue
15 shortages or unexpected expenditures,which may occur throughout the year. This reserve
16 for working capital represents approximately 27.3 percent of budgeted expenditures for
17 2004. The total fund balance of the General Fund represents approximately 30.2 percent
18 of the current year's budgeted expenditures. Each year this reserve has been increased in
19 an effort to reach the City's goal of maintaining a reserve balance of between 30 percent
20 and 35 percent.
21
22 Revenues before transfers were $290,000 less than budgeted amounts (loss of state aids)
23 and expenditures were $192,700 less than budgeted and amounted to approximately 95
24 percent of budgeted amounts.
25
26 Special Revenue Funds - Each of the special revenue funds is maintained for a specific
27 purpose. These funds remain financially sound at December 31, 2003, although certain
28 balances have declined due to utilization of funds and diminishing revenue sources to
29 maintain current program levels.
30
31 Debt Service Funds -Fund balances of these funds are restricted for debt service
32 requirements and are not available for current expenditure purposes until the debt is
33 retired. Many of the debt service funds maintained relate to the City's street improvement
34 program. Fund balances of these funds are the result of prepayments of assessments
35 levied in connection with improvement projects. Existing fund balances, combined with
36 annual tax and assessment levy amounts, are sufficient to satisfy 2004 debt service
37 requirements. Other debt service funds have positive fund balances and rely mainly on
38 general property tax levies for revenues to make debt service payments. Debt service
39 funds related to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have existing fund balances
40 and combined with current collection of tax increment revenues continuing, sufficient
41 revenues will be generated from the tax increment districts to satisfy current debt service
42 requirements related to the remaining two bond issues. Lease payments from the City
43 will be the primary source of revenue for payment of debt service pertaining to the Public
44 Facilities Lease Revenue bonds.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 05
July 13, 2004
Page 4
1 Capital Project Funds - The City incurred improvement costs of approximately
2 $5,390,000 in 2003. Improvement costs related to the street improvement project totaled
3 $1,552,300. The acquisition of property and preliminary costs associated with the
4 renovation of public works facilities and construction of a fire station totaled
5 approximately$2,134,000. Also, included in improvement costs were project costs of the
6 storm water improvement program of$295,710 and park improvement costs of$526,840.
7 In addition, the HRA incurred significant costs related to securing redevelopment
8 agreements and payments to developers of$790,000. Proceeds from the issuance of
9 Public Facilities Lease Revenue bonds used to finance costs of the public works and fire
10 improvement projects which were unexpended at year(available for completion of
11 project costs) accounted for the increase in fund balance of the capital project funds.
12
13 Proprietary Funds - The Liquor Fund had net operating income of$184,457 for the
14 year. Operating income decreased due to the closure of the City's on-sale and off-sale
15 operations at one location during redevelopment of this property. Transfers of$320,000
16 were made from the Liquor Fund during the year; $175,000 to the General Fund and
17 $150,000 to the Capital.Equipment Fund. The Utility Fund had net income from
18 operations of$177,781 for the year. Utility rates were increased effective January 1,
19 2003, to eliminate operating losses incurred in prior years. These losses were partially
20 offset by investment income from water filtration funds. Revenues from the water
21 filtration funds are being used for maintenance of treatment facilities. The increase in
22 rates was also necessary to provide revenues for repayment of the bonds issued in 2003
23 related to system improvements.
24
25 Other Matters - Included in the accrued compensated absences liability at December 31,
26 2002, was approximately$100,000 related to compensatory time owed City employees.
27 Due to management efforts during the year this portion of the liability was significantly
28 reduced. Transfers from the General Fund were not necessary to pay these costs since the
29 liability was paid from operating funds during the year.
30
31 Mr. Bonniwell concluded in noting his report is intended solely for the information and use of
32 the City Council, management and others within the organization. He stated his
33 recommendations are intended to improve or strengthen financial management and
34 administration.
35
36 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Faust,to Adopt Resolution
37 04-052 Approving the Audit of the City of St. Anthony for the Year Ended December 31, 2003.
38
39 Motion carried unanimously.
40
41 Discussion:
42 Councilmember Stille inquired as to Mr. Bonniwell's thoughts on how implementing GASB34
43 will better the City in moving forward. Mr. Bonniwell stated that the"principal"idea of
44 GASB34 is to provide one balance sheet rather than having several columns,noting it outlines
45 what the City's fixed assets are and shows that the depreciation of those assets are an expense to
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 06
July 13, 2004
Page 5
1 the City on an ongoing basis. He added that it is"critically"important to know what the City's
2 fund balances are.
3
4 Councilmember Stille questioned as to whether tracking the City's"leverage"of certain financial
5 ratios, compared to industry standards, and to cities of similar size can be done? Mr. Bonniwell
6 suggested that in the future when all cities have converted to GASB34 it might be possible.
7
8 Councilmember Stille inquired as to what the City can do to improve their moody's financial
9 rating. Mr. Bonniwell assured him that since the City converted to GASB34 their rating should
10 improve.
11
12 Councilmember Thuesen suggested the difficulty in accounting for assets with depreciation and
13 the fact that the aggressive improvements the City has made to improve their road conditions are
14 not included in the reports. Mr. Bonniwell responded in stating the City had three options
15 available, adding where costs were available is what was used. He indicated that costs for the
16 road improvements dating back to 1993 were capitalized, along with.depreciation, indicating
17 what is on the books is a net of this cost. He added the City made the recommendation not to
18 include the remainder of the roads declaring them either suitable of fully depreciated, therefore
19 of no value to the City.
20
21 Councilmember Thuesen suggested that GASB34 would a positive for a City that is aggressive
22 in maintaining its assets, noting it would reflect their re-investments. Mr. Bonniwell stated that
23 is correct.
24
25 Councilmember Faust questioned the Water Filtration Fund that was built up from the receipt of
26 money for water contamination. He noted that some of the money was used for collateral and
27 inquired as to if the City is using the money too quickly to have funds available for replacing the
28 Water Filtration Plant when needed.
29
30 Mr. Bonniwell responded in pointing out the section in the Audit Report noting that$5.2 M
31 worth of assets are still available in the fund and that the City received a surplus in 2003. He
32 added that the funds that are available would not be enough to replace the plant.
33
34 City Manager Mornson interjected in stating that the City has received estimates that the current
35 plant has twenty to thirty years of operation left. He added that some of the money taken from
36 the fund went to Central Park and the construction of the new liquor store. He noted that
37 improvements made to bring the Water Filtration Plant up to OSHA standards were paid out of
38 the Water Sewer Fund and not taken from the Water Filtration Fund.
39
40 Councilmember Faust continued in questioning whether the City should be concerned and look
41 to allocate funds from other sources to build the Water Filtration Fund back up to the amount
42 received for water contamination.
43
44 Mr. Bonniwell noted that the current facility has over twenty years of operation left, as Mr.
45 Momson stated,therefore, it should not be a concern for the City at this time.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 07
July 13,2004
Page 6
.4'n
1 Councilmember Faust inquired as to if Mr. Bonniwell had any recommendations for the City in
2 managing their finances. Mr. Bonniwell stated that 2003 was a"smooth"year for St. Anthony
3 despite the implementation of GASB34. He added that there was "no cause for alarm"during
4 the audit.
5
6 Councilmember Faust suggested that the City handled the aggressive spending, with regard to re-
7 development,well. Mr. Bonniwell stated yes, the City was "prudent"in the use of existing
8 resources.
9
10 Mayor Hodson indicated that it was good to hear that the City is still very healthy despite
11 aggressive re-developments that has taken place and is underway. He continued in
12 complimenting Mr. Mornson and the Financial Staff for their efforts.
13
14 VI. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
15 A. Ordinance 04-004, Section 515 Dogs, Allowing three dogs per household and changing
16 immunization requirements. (2nd Reading)
17 City Manager Morrison reviewed the second version of the amended dog ordinance. He noted
18 this version contains the amended Immunization for rabies text. He indicated a section 515.05 -
19 Special Multiple Dog License,has been added allow the City ordinance to maintain the two dog
20 restriction but residents wishing to possess three dogs could obtain a license with the following
21 conditions:
22 a.) Written approval of the occupants from at least seventy-five percent of the
23 residential property abutting the licensed premised.
24 b.) Fenced Yard: The yard of the licensed premises is fenced in such a manner as to
25 restrain the dogs on the premises from leaving the yard.
26 c.) Nuisance: Dogs kept on the licensed premises do not create a nuisance by excess
27 barking or by creating unsanitary conditions.
28 d.) Fee: Payment of a yearly license fee of$20.00.
29 e.) Denial of application: The Chief of Police may deny requests for renewal of a
30 special multiple dog license based upon complaints received during the preceding
31 year. In the event of such a denial,the applicant may within ten days of being
32 advised of the denial, request, in writing, a hearing before the City Council on the
33 denial.
34 Mr. Morrison added these conditions place the responsibility of having the extra dog with the
35 resident,noting all provisions,A thru E are only for a third dog.
36
37 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to approve Ordinance
38 04-004; Section 515 Dogs,Version 2, Allowing Three Dogs per Household and Changing
39 Immunization Requirements. (2nd Reading)
40
41 Ayes—4, Nays—1 (Thuesen). Motion carried.
42
43 Discussion:
44 Councilmember Horst noted, as in the first reading, the complaints he has received are due to the
45 nuisance of barking dogs,not to the number of dogs. He added that he does not believe the
46 number of dogs correlates to the nuisance. He indicated the changes address the issue of
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 08
July 13, 2004
Page 7
1 nuisance without restricting a multiple pet owner. He added that he hopes the suggested
2 amendment works.
3
4 Councilmember Faust noted he likes the idea of permitting for the third dog. He pointed out to
5 Mr. Mornson that in one place the amendment states three dogs over the age of six months, and
6 in another it states three dogs over the age of three months. He continued suggesting that
7 Council look at being more specific in regard to the use of the term"abutting"under written
8 approval. He added that he likes the idea of the applicant obtaining written approval from their
9 neighbors due to the fact that it involves everyone within the neighborhood in the process. For
10 the sake of discussion, Councilmember Faust recommended 200 feet as the distance required
11 from the applicant's property to obtain written approval.
12
13 Councilmember Stille stated he was unsure of the correct figure that would work for the
14 community. He noted he still believes that two dogs should be the standard, adding he has no
15 problem with a third dog by permit. He continued, agreeing with Councilmember Faust,that
16 more structure needs to be added if the ordinance is amended.
17
18 Councilmember Stille suggested the fact that having more dogs leads to an increase in nuisance
19 is up for"debate." He noted that St. Anthony is a"unique' suburb, adding that recently the
20 Council approved a lot variance of fifty feet, which would be difficult in accommodating
21 multiple dogs. He concluded in stating that he believes allowing for a third dog by permit is a
22 "win-win" for the community.
23
24 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he does not support the second version amendment. He
25 noted that a responsible dog owner is not determined by the number of dogs they own. He
26 provided the Council with an example of an irresponsible dog owner,he saw recently, that let
27 their dog run free,therefore, not obeying the leash law. He suggested that if this owner had more
28 dogs, they would let them run free as well.
29
30 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he believes the Council and City Staff are confusing
31 enforcement with the number of dogs allowed. He noted requiring an applicant to be a certain
32 amount of feet from their neighbors and requiring them to lobby for their neighbors approval has
33 "subjectivity"written all over it. He added that he can guarantee that a responsible dog owner of
34 three will have a quieter backyard that an irresponsible dog owner of one.
35
36 There was discussion as to the age when puppies are vaccinated. An individual in the audience
37 stated the average age is eight weeks old.
38
39 Councilmember Stille added that the City has had issues with barking, therefore, moving forward
40 with allowing three dogs per household,with no structure,will increase the number of
41 complaints. He noted that he agrees with Councilmember Thuesen in that enforcement is being
42 mixed in, however, the City needs to provide some structure in amending the ordinance.
43
44 Councilmember Horst noted the language for this version was lifted from another community,
45 and that the Council needs to determine the "correct'' language to fit St. Anthony.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 09
July 13, 2004
Page 8
1 Councilmember Thuesen indicated that he is still not convinced that three is the magic number to
2 begin requiring permitting. He suggested that an irresponsible dog owner of one should be
3 required to go through the permitting process for two dogs.
4
5 Mayor Hodson stated that he is "okay"with the second version as presented. He noted there is
6 already a section in the ordinance addressing nuisance and barking dogs. He indicated in regard
7 to enforcement, he would like to believe that other communities specify the number of feet other
8 than utilizing the term abutting.
9
10 VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
11 City Manager Mornson reported the following:
12 1. Four public hearings will be held on Tuesday, July 20, 2004. Reports will be on the
13 agenda at the July 27, 2004 Council Meeting.
14 2. The decision was made to bid the development o 39h Avenue, Silver Lake Development,
15 in three phases. The Second phase, which is the pavement of the roads from Sliver Lake
16 Road to the public park area,will be bid Friday,July 23, 2004, and will be presented by
17 Todd Hubner at the July 27, 2004 Council Meeting.
18 3. The Shell of the new liquor store is constructed. The store is anticipated to be open by
19 September 10, 2004, therefore,the road will be in by that date as well.
20 4. A total of five new commercial retail buildings will be up by Labor Day.
21 5. The permit was approved by Wal-Mart over the July 4, 2004 weekend; construction will
22 begin the middle of July.
23 6. The Fire Station is on scheduled to open mid-October to early November. A dedication
24 will be held in November, which will coincide with Fire Prevention Week.
25 7. Since the open house at Public Works, the salt storage facility has begun construction.
26 8. Have been officially notified that Spectators will be withdrawing as a restaurant
27 candidate for the Silver Lake Development. The developers have until September 2005
28 to deliver the City a restaurant for the planned development. Of the four restaurants
29 biding, the developers chose Spectators. Spectators have been putting up a lot of new
30 restaurants and will not be able to meet the deadline. An update will be presented at an
31 upcoming Council meeting.
32 9. The City has had an impressive year financially, being a"major"accomplishment despite
33 new construction and the"massive"re-developments. Credit needs to be given to Stuart
34 Bonniwell,Roger Larson, the Police Chief, the Fire Chief,the Public Works Director and
35 the Liquor Operations Manager for their efforts.
36
37 Councilmember Horst reported his attending a meeting with the St. Anthony Sister Association.
38 He noted the topic of discussion was the return of the high school choir from Finland. He added
39 that St.Anthony will be having a Finnish visitor coming,with a picnic and community event
40 being held, on Saturday, July 17, 2004 from 11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., in her honor.
41
42 Councilmember Stille reported the opportunity the Council recently had to tour a refurbished
43 home, on 33rd Avenue,by the Greater Metro Housing Association(GMHA). He noted that the
44 service they provide to communities to provide a homeowner the chance to sell their home for
45 market value without having to make improvements to meet code regulations. GMHA in return
46 puts additional money into the property creating an updated and improved home to market. He
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 13, 2004 10.
Page 9
1 encouraged the public, if they are aware of a situation,to recommend GMHA. He suggested that
2 it is a"perfect"opportunity to maintain St. Anthony's housing capacity.
3
4 Councilmember Thuesen reported his attendance at the park dedication of Silverwood,the .:.
5 former Salvation Army Camp,by Three Rivers. He indicated the plan of Three Rivers is to
6 focus on education, arts and environment. He suggested that Council look into rendering the
7 plan in the City offices for the public to view. He added that improvements will be made and
8 determined as funds are available.
9
10 Councilmember Thuesen continued in reporting that the Patriots Marching Band returned from
11 Philadelphia where they performed in the Fourth of July Parade. He noted that the band has a
12 national following, and that they are a reflection of the youth of St. Anthony, adding the public
13 should be "proud."
14
15 Councilmember Faust encouraged the public to take the time to tour the new Public Works
16 facility. He noted that the employees are very proud of their new location.
17
18 Councilmember Faust continued in reporting his attendance at the first policy meeting of the
19 League of Minnesota on June 25, 2004,regarding"Fiscal Futures", in which he was elected Vice
20 Chair. He noted that the organization allows cities to develop polices for the next legislative
21 session. He added that three more meetings will take place, followed by the agenda will be
22 approved at the League of Minnesota's annual meeting in October 2004.
23
24 Councilmember Faust also encouraged the public to sign up for the Chamber Golf Tournament
25 that will be held of August 6, 2004. He noted that sign up can be done at City Hall or at the
26 liquor stores.
27
28 Mayor Hodson reported the opening of Silverwood Village in September 2004. He added that it
29 will be an"enjoyable"area for the public.
30
31 VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM.
32 Chris Addington of 2612 St. Anthony Boulevard addressed the Council in thanking them for
33 recognizing that having three dogs does not mean the owner will be less responsible. She
34 thanked Councilmember Thuesen for his "insightful"comments. She stated that she wants a
35 "win-win"for the community as well,however, expressed her concern with stating 75 percent or
36 specifying the number of feet between properties. She posed to the Council the possibility of
37 living next to someone who may not like her dogs, therefore,would not sign allowing her a third
38 dog. She concluded in noting that she would like some type of"assurance" from the Council
39 that this could not happen. She asked the Council to take her concerns into consideration during
40 their final discussion.
41
42 Bruce Troop of 2829 30th Avenue Northeast noted he thought that Councilmember Thuesen was
43 right"on point." He added that eight out of ten of his neighbors own one dog, some that bark
44 incessantly. He noted that it is the responsibility of the owner to bring their dog in. He indicated
45 that if the nuisance gets to be too much, then enforcement becomes an issue. He stated he agrees
46 with Councilmember Thuesen in that an irresponsible dog owner of one should have to apply for
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11
July 13, 2004
Page 10
1 a permit for their second dog. He thanked the Council and expressed his appreciation for their
2 time in making a decision which will be a"positive"for the community.
3
4 Leif Thorsen of 3215 32"d Avenue Northeast addressed the Council and the public in noting that
5 during the last week of July, the Andrew Lloyd Weber presentation of Joseph will be playing at
6 the high school auditorium. He added that admission is free and encouraged attendance.
7
8 Mr. Thorsen continued in addressing the Council regarding his concerns in amending the dog
9 ordinance. ,He indicated that there are eight dogs on properties that adjoin his. He noted that he
10 has good neighbors and they all get along well. He added, however, that the dogs do not get
11 along as well. He suggested that dogs are territorial and if one barks, another responds in
12 barking also. He stated that three dogs make more noise than two dogs and more than one dogs.
13
14 Mr. Thorsen indicated that in discussing the nuisance of barking dogs with his neighbors,they
15 each claim that it is not their dog and that they are responsible dog owners. He added that the
16 problem is not that he has too many neighbors, it's that there are too many dogs. He suggested
17 that allowing for a third dogs will only add to the noise in the community. He added that he is
18 sure he is not alone in this, since there are several areas in the community that are already
19 heavily populated with dogs.
20
21 Mr. Thorsen asked the Council to consider the impact that amending this ordinance would make
22 on the community. He concluded in urging the Council leave the dog ordinance as it is and to
23 enforce the codes that are already on the books.
24
25 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
26 None.
27
28 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
29 City Manager Mornson noted that National Night Out will be August 3, 2004, adding that there
30 will be a Resolution presented at the July 27, 2004 Council Meeting declaring the day. He
31 indicated that a list of the block parties will also be presented at the meeting.
32
33 Mayor Hodson inquired as to how an individual goes about adding a block party to the list. Mr.
34 Mornson stated that they should contact the Police Department.
35
36 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
37 Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m.
38
39
40 Respectfully submitted,
41
42
43 Danielle Buckmeier
44 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
45
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 12
July 13, 2004
Page 11
1
2 Mayor
3 ATTEST:
4 City Clerk
13
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: July 27, 2004 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors License:
Central Minnesota Tree Service, Fridley, MN
Heating Contractors License:
Mobile Maintenance Inc., Fridley, MN
Jay Hawk Mechanical, Inc., Lino Lakes, MN
Apollo Heating&Vent. Corp., Oakdale, MN
Air Mechanical, Inc., Ham Lake, MN
14
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: July 27, 2004 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Liquor Licenses &Permits for Approval:
Temporary 3.2 Beer Permit:
Pat Kelly Family Picnic
September 26, 2004
12:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m.
Central Park Pavilion
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. HNThVNY V1LLAut
07/21/2004 07: Check Register GL540R-VO6.60 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT 15
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
008964 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 22996 07/28/04 155.31
008471 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 22997 07/28/04 59.38
007252 ALBRECHT 22998 07/28/04 3,877.00
009099 AMERICAN PATRIOT ELECTRI 22999 07/28/04 4,400.00
008450 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, 23000 07/28/04 239.82
008909 ARCH WIRELESS 23001 07/28/04 21.81
008255 AVAYA, INC. 23002 07/28/04 117.28
009018 BCA - BTS 23003 07/28/04 90.00
008555 BIFFS, INC. 23004 07/28/04 252.52
004039 BONNIWELL/STUART J 23005 07/28/04 13,925.00
007157 BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC 23006 07/28/04 32.10
.00002 CARVER COUNTY 23007 07/28/04 250.00
00006 CCE INFO CENTER #176631 23008 07/28/04 25.00
002380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 23009 07/28/04 31524.14
008577 CITY OF ST. PAUL 23010 07/28/04 185.25
004107 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLN 23011 07/28/04 4,169.48
009096 D & D INSTRUMENTS, INC. 23012 07/28/04 34.00
007178 D-ROCK CENTER & SMALL EN 23013 07/28/04 242.07
008429 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF 23014 07/28/04 510.00
007371 DISCOUNT STEEL, INC. 23015 07/28/04 153.36
000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 23016 07/28/04 2,053.27
008153 FILTERFRSH 23017 07/28/04 26.99
008647 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 23018 07/28/04 62.55
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 23019 07/28/04 284.04
007114 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT 23020 07/28/04 52.51
001180 GOODIN COMPANY 23021 07/28/04 . 41.64
001250 GRAINGER INC/W W 23022 07/28/04 246.35
001300 HACH COMPANY 23023 07/28/04 166.71
008709 HALL/SUSAN M.H. 23024 07/28/04 38.84
00001 HALLADA/COLLEEN 23025 07/28/04 133.61
001420 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 23026 07/28/04 181.30
008221 HEDBACK,ARENDT, & CARLSO 23027 07/28/04 5,000.00
008944 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT 23028 07/28/04 2,114.03
008376 HENNEPIN CNTY SHERIFF'S 23029 07/28/04 253.86
008252 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 23030 07/28/04 35.65
008239 HOSKA/JIM 23031 07/28/04 245.72
00002 ICMA CONFERENCE 23032 07/28/04 645.00
008658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I 23033 07/28/04 76.50
008891 INTER-TEL TECHNOLOGIES 23034 07/28/04 115.00
008674 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE 23035 07/28/04 100.00
009095 INTERSTATE COMPANIES, IN 23036 07/28/04 85.20
00003 JINDRA/CAROL 23037 07/28/04 119.94
007225 LEROY SIGNS 23038 07/28/04 4,147.10
008989 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL 23039 07/28/04 1,093.01
008229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 23040 07/28/04 596.20
009069 MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION, INC 23041 07/28/04 27,803.65
002160 MARSHALL CONCRETE PROD 23042 07/28/04 2,261.01
007835 METROCALL 23043 07/28/04 31.26
002280 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 23044 07/28/04 179.34
008713 MINNCOMM UTILITY CONSTRU 23045 07/28/04 10,400.00
008803 MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICES 23046 07/28/04 15.00
008884 MURLOWSKI PROPERTIES 23047 07/28/04 55.91
005232 MURPHY'S SERVICE CENTER 23048 07/28/04 27.00
002505 NARDINI FIRE EQUIP CO 23049 07/28/04 91.39
009094 NORTH STAR INT. TRUCKS, 23050 07/28/04 14.18
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 23051 07/28/04 609.98
001230 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 23052 07/28/04 138.00
008528 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES 23053 07/28/04 311.00
008805 PETTY CASH - BREMER BANK 23054 07/28/04 189.05
00004 POSITIVE ID INC. 23055 07/28/04 320.41
004492 QWEST 23056 07/2,8/04 421.85
008462 RAMSEY COUNTY 23057 07/28/04 4,704.84
008876 S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC 23058 07/28/04 249,936.67
008839 SECOND NATURE LAWN AND 23059 07/28/04 12,648.00
003490 STREICHER'S 23060 07/28/04 930.46
008872 SUCIU/BARB 23061 07/28/04 125.75
002630 SUN TURF 23062 07/28/04 134.19
008917 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI 23063 07/28/04 100.00
007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 23064 07/28/04 439.90
003560 TRACY PRINTING 23065 07/28/04 3,670.65
009093 TWIN CITY SPRAY LLC 23066 07/28/04 1,768.45
009097 TWIN CITY SPRAY LLC 23067 07/28/04 75.30
008859 U.S. BANK 23068 07/28/04 116,859.37
008336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 23069 07/28/04 153.84
008270 UNITED STATES POSTAL SER 23070 07/28/04 600.00
009023 US INTERNET 23071 07/28/04 62.50
008858 VEIT & COMPANY 23072 07/28/04 170,950.52
008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 23073 07/28/04 125.03
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 23074 07/28/04 58.97
008887 WELLS FARGO BANK 23075 07/28/04 1,100.00
008935 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 23076 07/28/04 113,532.46
009075 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 23077 07/28/04 340.32
009042 WORKFLOW 23078 07/28/04 179.28
002680 XCEL ENERGY 23079 07/28/04 16,193.87
007325 YOCUM OIL COMPANY, INC. 23080 07/28/04 5,753.45
00005 YOUNG/ERICH 23081 07/28/04 63.80
003820 ZAHL EQUIPMENT COMPANY 23082 07/28/04 838.04
BREMER BANK NA 794,393.23 ***
m
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
07/20/2004 13: Check Register GL540R-V06.60 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK$ DATE AMOUNT tb
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008964 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 23512 07/28/04 57.69
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 23513 07/28/04 11,348.86
004039 BOHNIWSLL/STUART J 23514 07/28/04 4,350.00
.00001 BRIDGEMAN, PAUL 23515 07/28/04 331.06
009100 CAT 6 FIDDLE BEVERAGE 23516 07/28/04 49.98
002380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 23517 07/28/04 43.65
004065 CENTRAL LOCK 6 SAFE CO 23518 07128/04 60.98
004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO., 23519 07/28/04 442.80
008814 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE 23520 07/28/04 16.05
009017 D'VINE WINE DISTRIBUTORS 23521 07/28/04 85.20
008557 DAILEY DATA 6 ASSOCIATES 23522 07/28/04 741.23
004120 EAGLE WINE CO 23523 07/28/04 5,790.94
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 23524 07/28/04 27,231.60
004135 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC 23525 07/28/04 3,366.57
008697 EXTREME BEVERAGE 23526 07/28/04 224.00
008647 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 23527 07/28/04 3.83
009102 GRAND PERE WINES, INC 23528 07/28/04 1,841.30
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 23529 07/28/04 22,921.38
004207 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 23530 07/28/04 3,375.27
008252 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 23531 07/28/04 89.25
008438 INSIGNIA SYSTEMS, INC. 23532 07/28/04 401.37
004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 23533 07/28/04 9,630.09
.00002 JTD INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 23534 07/28/04 209.86
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 23535 07/28/04 30,742.75
002040 LILLIE- SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 23536 07/28/04 340.00
008229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 23537 07/28/04 105.72
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 23538 07/28/04. 11,984.78
004277 MIDWEST TAPE 6 RIBBON IN 23539 07/28/04 500.00
007120 MINNESOTA UC FUND 23540 07/28/04 4,189.81
008881 MINNESOTA WINEGROWERS 23541 07/28/04 48.50
004299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO. 23542 07/28/04 6.70
008996 NEEDHAM DISTRIBUTING CO 23543 07/28/04 296.80
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 23544 07/28/04 224.48
004354 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 23545 07/28/04 1,448.02
004360 PHILLIPS WINE 6 SPIRITS 23546 07/28/04 5,310.97
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 23547 07/28/04 2,134.96
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 23548 07/28/04 3,307.48
008787 PROMOTIONAL PAGES, INC. 23549 07/28/04 599.00
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 23550 07/28/04 4,086.15
004492 QWEST 23551 07/28/04 14.15
008219 QWEST DEX 23552 07/28/04 196.00
009101 SANDSTONE DISTRIBUTING C 23553 07/28/04 200.00
008982 SBC PAGING 23554 07/28/04 14.06
008983 SOULO DESIGN, INC 23555 07/28/04 195.00
001810 ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE KIWA 23556 07/28/04 40.00
008470 SUN NEWSPAPERS 23557 07/28/04 750.00
008270 UNITED STATES .POSTAL SER 23558 07/28/04 100.00
008888 VALPAK OF MINNEAPOLIS-ST 23559 07/28/04 1,500.00 r
009059 VALUEWEB 23560 07/28/04 59.85
008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 23561 07/28/04 212.42
004499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC. 23562 07/28/04 603.00
002680 XCEL ENERGY 23563 07/28/04 1,292.79
009076 XCELERATED COMPUTER SOLD 23564 07/28/04 2,799.00
003840 ZEP MFG COMPANY _ ' 23565 07/28/04 3,531.26
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 169,446.61 wrw
A�
17
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 07/08/04 MEETING DATE: 07/20/04
TO: Chair Stromgren & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Wiggins Variance Request
Requested Action:
July 20 is the public hearing for the side yard variance request of Dave and Lisa
Wiggins, 3200 Skycroft Drive. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be
forwarded to the City Council for their July 27 meeting.
Background:
Dave and Lisa Wiggins are requesting a side yard variance of 12 feet for an addition to
their home. City code requires that a side yard adjacent to a street must be at least 45
feet wide (30 feet plus the 15 feet street easement/public right.of way). The 15 X 25 foot
proposed addition would put their home within 33 feet of 32"d Avenue.
The Petition for Variance attached describes the request and hardships, etc. Last
month, Mr. Wiggins visited with the Planning Commission about the request when he
came forward for a concept review.
Attachment:
• Petition for Variance
. ��7� 18
Date.
Fee:
R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
Applicant: D2 t S o Wi qivLS Phone: (6(-70 706 412
Address:
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): 0wne,r
Legal Description of property proposed for variance: L vc 2�1 131ock
Street Address: 37oO
Presently Zoned: Q_ '
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please,respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
L. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of
the,parcel or lot, the proposed variance. would relieve an unduihardshin, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced. a iwa"ae0 r�s4 y �ei�klo�r �b r�r-tv� r+ t� � �
CFJ� GE��►-L ) ® lCivu�SCCs-(�Id1� `- �oss�� t�sS o� lavc�t bciSSia� '}/'�
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district.
(see_"CILC".) s1 AL` fi*r c.,,vv_a r- loA-
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
�e- a� At. i-LN;Q .
Signature f pplicant.
06 -07 -04 *60 o00CK
19
Variances. (1665.06)
Application. An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply
with the Zoning Code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed.to be
constructed, may apply-for a-variance upon payment of the fee as specked in the
Zoning Ordinance.
Council Approval. Variances to the dimensional provisions of the Zoning Code may
be granted by the Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, after a
public hearing is held by the Planning Commission. Variances will not be granted
with respect to uses. A majority of affirmative votes by the Councilmembers present
is required to approve a variance request.
Evidence. No variance.will be granted unless the evidence presented by the petitioner
discloses all of the following facts:
(a) The subject matter of the application is within the scope of the Zoning
Ordinance subsection regarding variances.
(b) Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship
because:
1:) The property cannot be put to. a reasonable use without the
variance.
2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the
owner.
3.) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality.
4.) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship.
(c) The circumstances.causing the hardship are unique to the individual
property under consideration.
(d). The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code.
Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission will consider the
application at a public hearing at any"regular or special meeting. Notice for the public
hearing will be given in accordance with Section 115 of the City Ordinance. The Planning
Commission, sitting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, will make a recommendation
to the Council as follows:
(a) Recommend that the variance application can be granted because the
evidence considered at the meeting supports each of the findings
Petition for Variance
20
Owners: Dave and Lisa Wiggins
Property: 3200 Skycroft Drive NE
Request: Side Yard Variance
This purpose of this letter is to request an 12 foot side yard variance to accommodate an
addition to our single-family, split-level residence at 3200 Skycroft Drive. City code
requires that a side lot adjacent to a street be at least 45 feet wide(30 feet plus an additional
15 feet for street easement/public right of way). The addition we are proposing would put
our structure within 33 feet of 32nd Avenue.
CURRENTLY: The structure we currently live in was built in 1961, and has been carefully
maintained and updated for over 40 years. It is difficult to argue that the property cannot be
put to "reasonable use"without an addition when it has been so efficiently utilized in the
past. Yet, we are finding the house lacking in many important respects. First, there is a need
for a larger, more useful, and efficient living space on our main floor. Second,we need more
storage space. Our closets are small,the basement is small and crowded, and the attic is
unusable for storage. Third,we need a room that would function as a home office space. As
a math teacher, I have a need for additional space at home for my library, files, and desktop
computer.
PROPOSED: The proposed 15x25 foot addition would include a main floor family room, a
basement office, and a basement bedroom. Modifications in main floor layout would allow
for more efficient use of our dining room and kitchen. Additional storage would be
accomplished through built-in cabinets and shelves in the new family room and modifying
the basement layout. We believe this addition would not alter the essential character of the
locality, noting that neighboring properties along 32nd Avenue are set back similar distances
from the curb and that potentially problematic sight lines from the streets to the addition are
blocked by a large pine tree.
HARDSHIP: It is our belief that the side yard is the only viable option for the proposed
addition. Visually, the side yard along the street seems to be large enough for the addition.
If this side yard were adjacent to another property,we would not need a variance. However,
city code indicates that for corner lots, a distance of 45 feet from the street be maintained.
Could the addition be put in rear yard,where no variance would be needed? We believe a
rear addition would:
1) likely result in the loss of a mature shade tree (40 year old basswood);
2) ruin the character and functionality of our landscaped rear yard;
3) reverse recently corrected watershed problems due to the slope toward the house;
4) exacerbate water runoff problems for our north neighbor at 3204 Skycroft Drive.
Respectfully,
v�
B. H. BRADLEY
CIVIL ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR 21
3829-24TH AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS e,MINN. r
PARKWAY 4-2188
4*1o11
t
st i CGS
Ar
,k.
v , l.•�. 4/ `-'°^.,.:�• ^� £fig 9fi p
t
'lie
N #
22
NO
1.
14
!
r_t
,�:t'�; ..`••:. .`i ran:
:L
.tom ••)i^��.��•, _
tr
?tf
•T
r
:h `
'?:-� -:L ::�+• MP's
.1, 7�.- ��• .r.n _�i F.ir ,•:�"'�.7.:- .i r•3l_^'! _ :1.�
1.!'c
i
rJ
r=.
t"
t$
f
' :r +::d'
V
'1`
L_
TV N
+ -�:��/ •• fir!'
;.r
„
r r'
:r
I
,Ir _
i
r I.,
I_
i�
}+'
1-
1
1
J1.
.. r Ire o ll
i
rr=
HO __
Ji
717 F
7.
- -� �-�� I I ; II JI I • •. ..
iI i I I I -
_
m Ntir
I- I
`• ;. .;
1
A'
I •F f
1•
pr
= .
I
rl. '
Ir
^C'
.T
\9'r I•'
•.l
•.i
j•
I'
\' FA d
non•T rf. { '
:qs_ I — AI \ d•- •1 :III'
- t
c.
—
�— —
TIN
' L 1.__ I •Ii i� �
1
' J
24
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04-053
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST
FOR PROPERTY ADDRESSED 3200 SKYCROFT DRIVE
WHEREAS, an twelve foot side yard setback variance request was submitted to the City by
Dave and Lisa Wiggins; and
BE IT RESOLVED, following the public hearing held by the Planning Commission on July 20, 2004,
the Planning Commission recommended Council approve said request as the
following conditions pre-date owners. Pre-existing code is what some of the
neighboring properties enjoying a better, higher use with using the zoning
regulations. The variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The
economic considerations are not basis for the variance alone. The drainage is an
issue if the addition was placed in the backyard. All adjacent properties are close
to the street, and the variance is consistent with the spirit and intent of the zoning
code.
Adopted this 27th day of July, 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
25
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 07/08/04 MEETING DATE: 07/20/04
TO: Chair Stromgren & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manag
SUBJECT: Rabine Variance Request
Requested Action:
July 20 is the public hearing for the front yard variance request of Rod Rabine, 2800 34th
Avenue NE. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City
Council for their July 27 meeting.
Background:
Rod Rabine is requesting a front yard variance of 2.5 feet in order to add a front entry to
his home. Mr. Rabine is planning to build a handicap accessible front entry with a ramp.
The variance request is necessary in order to navigate a motorized wheelchair into the
front door. The Petition for Variance attached describes the request and hardships, etc.
According to the city code, in the R-1 single-family zoning district, the front yard must
have a depth equal to the greater of 30 feet or a distance equal to the average of the
front.yard depths of the two adjacent lots. Given this formula, staff went to the subject
property to measure the adjacent two lots. Staff found the east property (2804 34th
Avenue NE) measures 30 feet from curb to home; the west property (2712 34th Avenue
NE) measures 35 feet from curb to home. An average of the two adjacent lots is 33 feet;
therefore, the subject property should have this depth at a minimum.
With the petitioner proposing to extend 2.5 feet out from the current front of the home,
with a 2.5-foot variance request, would leave a 30.5-foot front yard setback. This would
match up pretty closely to the east neighbor's front yard setback, which is 30 feet.
Mr. Rabine has explained to city staff that the proposed front entry would have four
posts, so you would be able to"see through it."
Attachment:
Petition for Variance
Date: D 26
Fee:
77s 60.00 =
Other . . . . &
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
Applicant: Phone:
Address: /U 1
Status of Applicant Owner Buyer, Lessee, etc.): ug/7-aw
Legal Description o operty propopo for varian e: Z—& S 9 S�OJen 7P-rr�c�
Street Address: 6:' /r1 /�
Presently Zoned; 6?
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
L. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance. would relieve an undue.hardship, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced.
The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district.
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
Signature of Applicant.
JUN Z 2004
��. P�p.o0
27
Variances. (1665.06)
Application. An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply
with the Zoning Code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed.to be
constructed, may apply1or a-variance upon payment of the fee as specified in the
Zoning Ordinance.
Council Approval. Variances to the dimensional provisions of the Zoning Code may
be granted by the Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, after a
public hearing is held by the Planning Commission. Variances will not be granted
with respect to uses. A majority of affirmative votes by the Councilmembers present
is required to approve a variance request.
Evidence. No variance will be granted unless the evidence presented by the petitioner
discloses all of the following facts:
(a) The subject matter of the application is within the scope of the Zoning
Ordinance subsection regarding variances.
(b) Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue.hardship
because:
1:) The property cannot be put to, a reasonable use without the
variance.
2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the
owner.
3.) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality.
4.) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship.
(c) The circumstances.causing the hardship are unique to the individual
property under consideration.
(d) The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code.
Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission will consider the
application at a public hearing at any'regular or special meeting. Notice for the public
hearing will be given in accordance with Section 115 of the City Ordinance. The Planning
Commission, sitting as the .Board of Adjustments and Appeals, will make a recommendation
to the Council as follows:
(a) Recommend that the variance application can be granted because the
evidence considered at the meeting supports each,of the findings
28
Rod Rabine
2800 34th Ave NE
St. Anthony,MN 55418
612-789-4072
06-28-04
Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council,
I am applying for a variance affecting the front of our home. The goal of the
project is to create a handicap accessible front entry with ramp. This project will have a
front stoop/landing extending from the front of our home 5.5 ft. The front stoop/landing
will be 35.5 ft from the easement line. The ordinance allows me 33 ft from the easement
line, I am asking for a variance of 2.5 ft in order to complete the project. We need the
front landing this size to maneuver a 4 ft motorized wheelchair into the front door.
The circumstances leading to the project are as follows; My mother and father live in
Michigan during the summer. They are 70 plus years old, and my mother is paralyzed
from the waist down. She is permanently in a wheel chair and has trouble getting into the
front of our home. As of now we do not have a ramp,but wish to put one in creating an
accessible entry. My parents live with us several months out of the winter, and visit often
during the summer.
Our entry currently is from the side of our house, and faces our front closet. The area
between the front door and closet is 5 ft. My mother's "Amigo" wheel chair is 4 ft long.
The entry gives her 12 inches to maneuver her way into the house. She has to go forward
and back several times to get inside. She has hit the closet door many times which gives
her a jolt. The new entry will allow her to have a straight approach into the house. The
permanent ramp will eliminate the use of a clumsy/heavy portable ramp.
My wife and I have a 4 year old son and plan on raising him here in St. Anthony. We have
lived here for 2 1/2 years. I have a secure job with the City of Mpls, and appreciate the
proximity of my home to my job. We have no intentions of selling our home, on the
contrary we plan on staying here until retirement. I say this to show we are not motivated
by the increased value of our home, but only the relieve this project will bring.
It is important to us to give my mother a home she can live in without the hardships of a
non-accessible home. If for any reason my father were to pass on, I feel obligated and
would insist on having a home my mother could live in. This project would give us that
home and relieve the hardship.
We thank you for your consideration and assistance in this matter.
r
29
Materials used in project
Front entry with handicap ramp
*Concrete pavers
*Ramp facing will be stone or brick
*Walkway will have railings with pillar posts
*Ramp will come off the driveway
*Front door will be changed to facing the street
Landscaping
*Various shrubs and flowers
Our house setback and lot coverage in detail
Our lot is 10,500 sqft
*35%= 3675 sqft of coverage is allowed under city ordinance
The coverage we have now broken down is;
*2028 sqft House/Sidewalk
*1052 sgft Driveway
*440 sqft Garage
*135 sqft Rear porch
Total coverage is 3655 sqft leaving 20 sqft of coverage left to be used
The nieghbors house to the west has a setback of 3 5 feet, The neighbor to the east has a
set back of 30 feet. I am allowed a 33 ft set back. I am requesting a variance for 2.5 ft
changing my setback to 29.5 ft.
The change in setback only includes a front landing for the front door.
30
1 `
Al PTOV
vi
I
. �' � � �.7 2.` •r � .� .. � .. � :�.rn Vii:
i. ,tc w r a
as
vi
.•w
i. yr
Y'
}S
: •P
�'•' r�
,`T :r. �•���S!4,i�l`T.. Z.n S,1
$rt
y
7•y
,y.
a-s
._C
•.
T`em• g 't�1LS R s�ar+et�'
.Rota.� . �.��`•' __ •�.;:��'� �y
•;'ff. .fan:
1
.a'
T%
iy
-S S3 1 t7
c
- - -•i5;c:-..rte..
-AV xLh—p
r M—A'vlS
SG
K
l
Al
CY 4d-91
9 `I 0°V_4-v ,s2
soh
s�-
i �
a�Ow, aq I r M p.,b�c Z)jo -imp
POO puns .i/
S-mlod -/°.,v� S sSvll;p FaPod"o) Zr
(asvgj ,� Ii'" 9) monad :a j 1(,'M Vl-. A hw —
� � I
ISM
Pv�-alti
h1► i
a 1
f '
I
�p•�,ntoB 1nngb Il"^+4SI
r
I
�d"r'07
33
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04 - 054
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FRONT YARD SETBACK
VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY ADDRESSED 2800—34TH AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the St. Anthony Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 2004,
regarding a front yard setback variance request for 2800—341'Avenue NE; and
BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission recommended Council approve request by Rod Rabine,
because the applicant did not cause the hardship. The request for a handicapped
accessible ramp is a reasonable request. The building codes are over thirty years
old and were not as strict as they are today. The addition won't affect the locality
around their home. Economic consideration is not the basis alone of this
hardship. Granting of the variance is keeping with the spirit and intent of the
zoning code.
Adopted this 27th day of Luly 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
34
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 07/08/04 MEETING DATE: 07/20/04
TO: Chair Stromgren & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Sunset Memorial Park Sign
Requested Action:
July 20 is the public hearing for the sign variances associated with a second monument
sign proposed for Sunset Memorial Park, 2250 St. Anthony Boulevard. The Planning
Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their July 27
meeting. The applicant requested this case be brought forward swiftly; therefore, no
concept review was held.
Background:
Sunset Memorial Park is requesting two sign variances for a ground, or monument, sign
proposed for the intersection of St. Anthony Boulevard and New Brighton Boulevard
(see map attached). On behalf of Sunset Memorial Park, the Lawrence Sign.Company
has been contacting the City on this request.
Two variances have been requested by the applicant: (1) for a second monument sign;
and (2) a height variance of 6 feet for a proposed height of 14 feet.
The City's zoning map for the subject property shows it as R-1 Single Family. However,
according to the city code, cemeteries fall under Recreational Open Space (ROS). For
all intensive purposes, the City will consider this request under the ROS district; the
cemetery is considered a legal nonconforming use in the ROS.
Technically, staff has explained that one ground sign is allowed. One monument sign
was recently erected on the property at the Park entrance, on St. Anthony Boulevard
across from Gross Golf Course. (Please note this monument sign is not yet landscaped,
which is a requirement of all ground signs.)
The proposed ground sign measures an overall height of 14 feet with the base. The
maximum height for a ground sign is 8 feet, thus the variance request for 6 feet.
Upon review of the proposed sign, staff has noted the copy surface area measures 13'
X 7'6", or 97.5 square feet, for one side. In addition, after the fact, the applicant
explained this is a two-sided sign, which would put the total copy surface area at 195
square feet. In the ROS, the maximum allowed for copy surface area is 150 square feet,
which is quite liberal. The applicant's sign exceeds this; however, a variance request did
not come forward for this. The applicant is over by 45 square feet on copy surface area.
Staff has explained this to the applicant, but it was after the Public Hearing posting
occurred. It appears a variance for copy surface area would be necessary to implement
the proposed signage as two-sided.
35
The sign drawing submitted by the applicant does show landscaping; however, it is
limited given the pedestal and overall sign size.
This issue goes back to earlier in the year, when Lawrence Sign Company approached
the City on behalf of the Park, about the proposed signage. At that time, city staff
explained that the proposed sign did not meet the city code and rejected it. After that,
they attempted to submit the same sign repeatedly and were denied. In June, city staff
received an incomplete sign variance application and asked the applicant for more
information. Staff has since gone back and forth with the applicant, with information still
incomplete. All along, the applicant has expected and leaned heavily on the City to fill
out the variance application for them.
City staff has indicated, as presented, that the proposed ground sign is not acceptable.
The applicant wanted the request to come forward through the city process, as is, to see
what the response would be to the variance requests.
Attachments:
• Petition for Variance
• Map
• Proposed Sign Drawing
06/08/2004 12:18 FAX 612 781 9323 CITY OF ST ANTHONY [-A A
36
Date:
Fee:_$100.00
-CITY OF'ST. ANTHONY �?� ...z.,
Petition for Sign Variance ..
Applicant: °
Address: 55 —HPhone: �n�JI. LAV ,� I i
Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.):�;o3 1 r!St2�1. r
Street address and/or legal description of property petitioned for variance:
22 J �3k . r\3�31 N
Zoning district in which property is located:
Request: _
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions, using additional sheets,
if necessary.
1. The granting of the variance will not. be detrimental to the-public welfare or
incurious to other property in the neighborhood or village.
2. A particular hardship to the applicant would result if the strict letter of the
regulations are adhered to.
3. The conditions upon which the applications for a variance are based are Unique
to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable,
generally, to other property within the same land-use classification.
Si§jiaturd of Applic t
Date:
06 -14-04 * 100 . 000
37
June 18,2004
Susan M.H.Hall
Assistant City Manager
City of St. Anthony Lawrenck;,, ."
3301 Silver Lake Road
St.Anthony,MN. 55418 d.1 S,
ig n
RE: Sunset Memorial Park
Susan,
Thank you for your feedback,noted below you will find the detail needed to complete the
Variance Application. Please let me know if anything further is needed. We are committed to
meeting the your deadlines,to ensure we are on the calendar for your next meeting.
A- We are requesting a variance to allow for our Sign to have an overall height of 14%0".
B- We are requesting a variance to allow for a second Monument Sign, on our clients
extremely large property.
Sign variance questions 1-3:
L The granting of this variance will in no way be
welfare. Nor will it be injurious to an other Property to public health or
This Sign will be within the fenced property y P � ��r the neighborhood.
constructed in a safe,thou tf l of Memorial Park, and we will
gh manner.
2. Our client will find particular hardship placed on their business should they have
to
access
adhere to the strict letter of the known regulations for this site. The have(road
allowed to ident�its all along this Side of their property, and are not being
3. This situation is unique to this site, as it has a large layout,and spans across
several frontages,therefore requiring additional Signage to properly identify their
business.
Best Regards,
Scott M. Ruzin
Account Executiv
Lawrence Sign,Inc.
945 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE A ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104 A 651.488.6711 F
® FAX 651.488.6715
www.lawrencesigri.com
Page 1 of 1
Ile Dp i S%lt aware
,° � QomOaC
SLl �c Caine
Id
At
will/
\TlnriimP.ntcQ/,,')Opncl05 ..ORPtti nac\chPnrv\T.nra l0I n20Sett.ings\TemDorary%20Intemet... 7/6/2004
CONCEPT 03 A 4
ALDERWOIODS
CLIENT_
I
SUNSET ,
Fanerai Home and Cemetery A�HORIP
SUNSET � •� �� .��. LOCATION-
5 Funeral Home and Cemetery
smorr ffG�
T- Cremation Services A vance Planning
ACUNT EXECUT1VE-
x; y �DESI
GNER-
. �'� •
l amm
DRAWING.
Lr��Qn -
1-1800
DATE-
f8Yf8Wti.
q@
CUBIRWAISBAPPROVAL
THESE ARE THE
tE�il4gl4y PROPERTYAOF LAWRENCE SIGN EXCLUSIVE
POOLE FACE Ocl'E,�1�, t l OF THE�I IRECTIOIAL S16N
THEY ARE SUBMITTED TO YOUR
COMPANY FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE
A A u nUm F$ p�Frmna {MH 68 Painted WMIte&Matthews UwAcd Nmnlnute. OF YOUR CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER TO
'!"'9"' PURCHASE THESE PLANS OR T'0
•Face WIIIHe /"pedTo lot$erfio a PURCHASE FROM LAWRENCE SIGN
,,,,t A SIGN MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO
•��p�COIOR6 I Y k YG�I TO MdCGM PM6J`�II.A BIUG.
THESE
AIUmIgUm POIG I TH
�7fd AUmnu . EXHIBITION OF THESE PANS TO ANYONE
OTHER THAN EMPLOYEES OF YOUR
COMPANY, OR USEOF THESE PLANS
TO CONSTRUCT A SIGN SIMILAR TO.w THE ONE EMBODIED HEREIN,
IB EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN. IN THE
NT-THAT SUCH EXHIBITION OCCURS,
LAWRENCE SIGN EXPECTS TO BE
R E I M B U R S E D 5 2,0 0 0 1 N
COMPENSATION FOR TIME AND EF POUDLE FACE- NON-ILLUMINATED '05T& FANEL ,�-,)I&N • . T H EFORT EENTAILED IN PCREAAN I6.0
I
4®
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04 - 055
A RESOLUTION DENYING A MONUMENT SIGN VARIANCE FOR
(A)SECOND SIGN AND (B) FOR SIGN HEIGHT FOR
(B)2250 ST. ANTHONY BOULEVARD, SUNSET MEMORIAL PARK.
WHEREAS, the St. Anthony Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 2004,
regarding a sign variance for(a) second sign and(b) for sign height for 2250 St.
Anthony Blvd.; and
BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission recommended Council deny said request by Sunset
Memorial because the sign is too large at this location. The Planning Commission
encouraged Sunset Memorial to come back with a smaller sign with a possible
location at the southeast intersection. It was found that the variance in context
with the code was detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood.
Adopted this 27th day of July. 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
41
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 07/12/04 MEETING DATE: 07/20/04
TO: Chair Stromgren & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: City Electronic Monument Sign
Requested Action:
On July 20, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing for the actions
associated to implement the City's electronic monument sign. This includes two sign
variances and a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission's recommendation
will be forwarded to the City Council for their July 27 meeting.
Background:
On June 15, the Planning Commission held a concept review of the City's electronic
sign. The sign is proposed to be located on the hill in front of the tennis courts, nearby
the intersection of 33`d Avenue and Silver Lake Road (see map attached). The sign will
be two-sided, in a closed off "V" configuration (see attached drawing).
City staff has been working with LeRoy Sign .Company on sign specifications. Two
variances will be necessary to implement the signage: (1) for copy surface area; and (2)
a height variance of 2 feet for a proposed height of 10 feet. A conditional use permit is
also required.
It is recommended the City go with a 10' h X 12' w sign, which includes a two-foot brick
base. The sign's message center measures 4' h X 12' w, while the top half of the sign is
the City logo, measuring 4' h X 12' w. Per side, the sign's copy surface area measures
96 square feet. A double-sided side is recommended, which would make a total copy
surface area of 192 square feet. Per the sign ordinance, a maximum of 150 square feet
is allowed for total copy surface area in the Recreational Open Space (ROS) zoning
district, where the sign is proposed to be located. Therefore, a variance of 42 square
feet would be necessary.
The City's sign ordinance requires ground signs to be a maximum height of 8 feet. The
proposed sign is 10 feet with the brick base. Therefore, a height variance of 2 feet is
necessary for the proposed sign. Under the ROS zoning district, there is no requirement
mentioned for ground sign height; however, the City opted to ask for this variance given
typical ground sign height.
As far as justification for the variances, one reason the sign got larger was because it
had to incorporate the city logo. The city logo is dimensionally difficult to reduce to make
the sign copy surface area smaller. The city logo cannot be sized any smaller than
shown on the drawings to work. The city logo is required, per City Council goals and
objectives, for uniform communications. In addition, the sign needs to be large enough
for visibility purposes, so it can be seen from the roadway and is safe. Finally, the City
42
was limited as to where the sign could be placed, given obstruction and visibility issues
along Silver Lake Road.
The sign code stipulates minimum conditions with respect to the issuance of any -°-
conditional use permit for an electronic message sign (see attached). Those items are
covered the City's attached application. Staff is recommending the following conditions:
(1) flashing and animation prohibited; (2) hours of operation are limited and shall be
between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m; (3) message changeability should be minimum
required to accomplish the purpose of the sign (staff is recommending every five
minutes; that is negotiable); and (4) sign aesthetics--such as color (red or white), size of
reader board and sign (not to exceed what is proposed), construction materials (brick
base to match brick on the City Hall building), and landscaping (this can be basic,.such
as shrubbery shown on site plan, or an elaborate landscape plan, which would be
preferred; budget will dictate this); (5) consideration should be given to safety and
neighborhood; and (6) sign may only be used to promote items of general interest to the
community. The Planning Commission may have other conditions to add to this list.
To regulate content, staff has drafted the attached sign policy. The City Council will be
approving the policy to go with sign implementation. It is attached for informational
purposes for the Planning Commission.
Attachments:
• Petition for Sign Variance
• Application for Conditional Use Permit
• Sign Plan
• Sign Location
• Sign Code Excerpt
• Draft Sign Policy
JUL.IJ.G✓JYJ4 J•YJ4rl'I LC-Mul JIVIYJ I1V. r LCJ r.JJ
ao7/}zI2Qu4
q9:43 FAX 012 781 P323 RrTY'0F ST ANTRONT: .. dal
.. _ 43
Fee: 100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY hta'
Petition for Sign Variance
Applicant: city of St. Anthony
Address: 3301 Silver Llce Road Phone;612T789,8�81.
S►atus of applicdn-jf (awns;, 1-uyer, renter, agent, eio.): Owner
Street address and/or legal desrriptlon of property petitioned for variance:
3301 Si_1ver Lake Road
Zoning district, in which property is located: Recreational space
9a asst: variance of 42 s.f. in surface area and 2' � 'total helght is requ5eate4
fo� fki propo city URZ =n==t 949n.
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied
for approvsl of this request. Please respond to these 4onditions, using additional sheets,
if necessary.
1. The Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the•public welfare or
I injurious to other property in the neighborhood or village,The l�'er size and hea ght
will allow �e sign to be easier to dead and will not be detrimental to the
public welfare ov have a negative affect on property.
2. A particular hardship to the applicant wpuid result if the itrict letter of the
regulations are adhered to. In order for the sign to be properly visa•ble to drivers
ongsalver Lake Roact,r the sign needs to be set back f= the street as proposed
and thus needs to be slightly t!]ller apd larger to pe properly visible.
3. The conditions upon which the applications for a variance are based ere unique
to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable,
generally, to other property within the same land-use classification. The greater set back
allows the sign to have greater visibility to both tine north & south flow of the
traffic. The lamer ;34Ae is required to allow greater visibility of t-be sicjn and the
puiFolc service =$Sages that.will be di$played. Vxe to the layout and shape of the
city logo, the larger size is required to properly display the top identification
section of the sign so it
S gnature of Applicant
Date:
JUL.. 1J.CUU4 3•YJJr-II LLRV 1 �J/l UI`IJ p r iv. r iri r .c1.D
OVER 60 YEIARs
44
Q4514N carysufrINq ^ pAdRItA7IN6 MAINnNANGS • Sf RVICE v INOTA"TIGN
July No 2004
St, Anthony Village I
Admi4islratim Offices '
3301 Silver L*e Road
St.A4t wn ►, MN SS41 -1b�9
Aft City Council MwOers
RE; Varlauae Requ.ept for City Monignant Sign
A variance is being requested to iiicrease the 51ze of the rponyment sign proppsed for the
area south of te City Han=4 just west of to,tends cgpn. Ws area is zoned
recxeatlozW QpOA s-P40 4nd the surface area allowed per;section 1400.12.Subd. 4 for a
ground sign eamot exceed 15o square feet. The proppse4 sign is$'h x 12' ;= 94 s,f, per
side, for a tot4l of 192 SX, thus a variance of 42 s,,in su#fface area is being requested,
Also, a helglIt varianca of 2' is requested, There is no
height parai-neter set forth in this
section,however Subd. 2 in Section 1400-01 limits to ta'tal height of a sign to 8 feet,
including pedestal.
pue to the Pb4po of the city logo, the larger area is prQpQNPd so the top ideutification,
section of the sign c9m be pwporly visible frotn the street laud be proportionately correct.
TUe variance requested will at be dcuftental to the safety of people W*iug or driving
in the area, TIZe larger size will allow the sign to be easily road and give the desired
im Age of a tastef illy designed mo:a=eat sign that gives 4n overall loop of q4a.lity and
character to the City Mall complex, The height vaxiamce v ill allow the Sign to be installed
on a bride base that will rnatelt the existing City lull bW14ing,
i
i .
1
I
6325 Welcome Ao, N. - Minpeapolign,MN 65429
Office, 763-535-0080 - Paw%a-533-2593
I
45
Date: 6/14/04 Fee: $130.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Applicant: city of St. Anthony Phone:_612"789-RRR1
Address: 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN. 55418
Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.): Owner
Street address and/or legal description of property in question:
3301 Silver Lake Road
Zoning district in which property is located: Recreational Open Space (RbS)
Conditional use proposed: Electronic Message sign;
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied
before a conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using
additional sheets, if necessary.
1) The proposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the
zoning district in which it is to be located.
Yes. The electronic message sign is allowed in the ROS district, as_ a conditional use.
2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property'values or
improvements in the vicinity.
The message sign will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity. It will not be injurious..to property values.
3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to
provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will
contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community.
The message sign will be a benefit to the community, offering important messages
and reminders, of a public service nature.
Signature of applicant:
46
City of St. Anthony
Application for Conditional Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit Items:
Flashing and animation prohibited.
Hours of operation are limited and shall be between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.
Message will not change faster than 5 minutes
Sign aesthetics-
-red or white lettering only
-readerboard size not to exceed 4'h X 12' w
-brick base to match City Hall/Community Center building
- landscape plan to be minimum of shrubbery, as presented
Consideration should be given to safety and also the surrounding neighborhood.
Sign may only be used to promote items of general interest to community. Attached Sign
Policy will govern content.
FUW TMMS
COLM f
MERE
.Ll
l
i
i I �
� � I
I T'l
= TTI
i
o
990
i Y' STEEL GAS,-LINE. -
..............
Aa
r
C �uhonY
SV 114,ec r i ri i
` .Immok i
al
lot
.✓ .� �. .r� v+11�f�'da �'#1•_ til,�',_:', �.. i ��i' yr�Y�I �uY`..r
� I' � [c_����'��^}i IC:s' fP >;-- ,W�i2.11 Iti � e�!�„�:�-y�_ ` A 'Y���,��"'t�r'++°+�yY..�t'�'=+�`• f r � '�.�'
{ {' I '� ,..;•1:�1 , i - � , ?Ark p "t.�'b - ,' X71"T't^� � � �1 n '.r lr���A-�J��1�
��< � Frf 7t:I �-z-.��� �,' it A.e �t L tS V w+1f i7,9'�• 1
�,�_ y���y"^" Illll.....��aii ,jx J� }'� F, � .N.914 a •�. �,>.ti
"'I�LW"'J �t,`r run.•/� � Vs�+-{� ; �, 'lo r �'�,{���if,7�i y...
- ..�......•,---T �-•— _ -.. —"-�v.1 L. `.°. "a �,.y°.".'ate-� __.�. .1?_+..,. _ -
s-
�c
(f I
=7v
��*fit ,�1 t v.F�- r Tti fix p ( fi
Gk�t sy�P��s �'���5 .s� I�a,4�f�L y � 4,xt+•'�'L.'+� .�5� 'I �y-�- Jam"� • �
�j'b�W Wl 4. '- .4 �.Y}l.f Y .. 1 I��`T � ��P-' •fir - //I .
tr`- Z'S, e s '�u 'f �,1 k d Yfa{'�,tom.{.""s+s��a{'d q ti K'F'4*�}.:y�'���d''1'I�,�',�L ,�"�"5 ,� ,,'.' •. •
� uC I�TI 1` ' a_.-'I tl �rl`3IxLt�r�y,`'y t`> •. ;"ir• ,4+ y�5�,4`{yTi 1,✓,'i'•y 1 1; .x"' ..1 ( _ _ ,
�4s Y i4 5 •q'1 .! 1 .e Wly� 9 n f r_�'7i '� Y f I � �>�• � .C3
)'i`r'.As ._ r.� �i. P:n`f ;r`.y•rd f�.•K! a rti:� ti.. ? SMiL' 6 -•d a�'�y, FIZI x. ►�t L
49
(2) In a district zoned for light industrial businesses, signs containing one
square foot for every 100 square feet of ground floor space will be allowed
up to a total sign surface area of 150 square feet.
Subd. 4. Recreational Open Space. The following signs are permitted in a Recreational
Open Space District and maybe erected after obtaining a permit and paying required
license fee.
(1) Subject to approval of the Council, only ground and wall signs are allowed
in this district. The ground sign may have a sign surface area not to
exceed 150 square feet.
(2) Subject to the approval of the Council, and as.a conditional use, electr onic
message signs. The procedures contained in Section 1605.04 shall apply
to the issuance of a conditional use permit for an electronic message sign.
The conditions with respect to the issuance of any conditional use permit
for an electronic message sign shall cover at least the following:
a. the sign shall not be permitted to flash or contain any animation.
b. the hours of operation of the sign;provided, that in no event shall
the sign be permitted to be operated between the hours of 10:00
PM and 6:00 AM.
C. the message changeability shall be limited to the minimum amount
of changes required to accomplish the purpose of the sign.
d. aesthetics of sign, including,but not limited to,message color, size
of message board and sign, construction materials and landscaping.
e. location of sign with regard to surrounding area.
f. sign may only be used to promote items of general interest to
community.
1400.13 Adjustments and Appeals.
Subd. 1. Composition. The commission of adjustments and appeals will be comprised of
all of the members of the Planning Commission.
Subd. 2. Powers and Duties. The commission will hear and make recommendations to
the Council regarding:
(1) Appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement,
decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the
enforcement of this Chapter.
14-13
s®
"Draft"
POLICY FOR THE COMMUNITY BULLETIN BOARD SIGN
The City of St. Anthony has erected an Electronic Community Bulletin Board Sign at 3301
Silver Lake Road and desires to adopt a policy in regard to messages placed on the Electronic .
Bulletin Board.
The following guidelines will be used in placing messages on the Bulletin Board:
1. Scope:
a. The Community Billboard is an electronic marquee located at 3301 Silver Lake
Road.
2. Purpose:
a. To communicate effectively with all City residents, businesses, visitors and
community members.
b. To give City functions and community organizations the publicity for which the
sign was intended.
c. To provide newsworthy information and notices of organizational events,public
meetings, activities, opportunities and programs.
3. Operation:
a. The activity or event to be announced must be taking place locally or originate in
St. Anthony.
b. Notice of private activities, without a public purpose, and private business
functions will not be displayed.
c. Messages will be in good taste; with the City reserving the right to make final
determination as to what will or will not appear on the sign, how it will be
presented and in what order it will appear.
d. Length of time the message will appear on the board will range from two to ten
business days.
e. Events will be placed on the board subject to the priority and judgment of the
City.
51
Electronic Sign
Page 2
4. Priority Order:
a. City Council meetings and public notices,
b. City events of a community-wide nature.
c. Events relating to a narrow portion of the community such as churches,
schools and non-profit organizations.
I City Manager or his designee will have final approval of priority.
5. Political Announcements.
a. Only activities, meetings, etc. which are open to general public will be
announced. Activities or meetings where a fee is charged must have the fee
noted in the announcement.
b. No announcement may endorse, urge, support or attempt to influence the public with
regard to any candidate or issue, nor may any announcement be used for making
statements,promises, or any other campaign messages. Names of candidates or
issues will be used only when such names are necessary to identify the purpose of, or
speakers at, a meeting or an event.
6. Procedure.
a. Requests for billboard space must be made in writing to the City Managers or
his designee two weeks prior to the Monday on which the marquees are
changed.
b. Upon approval,the City Manager or his designee, will provide copies of the
billboard announcement to the requesting person.
C. The format and style of messages presented on the community billboard will
be dictated by the physical limitations of the marquee.
7. Responsibility:
a. The City Manager bears ultimate responsibility for the enforcement
and interpretations of the policies outlined in this procedure.
52
b. The City Manager may designate an individual (s) who will be
responsible for the implementation and administration of the policies
as outlined in this procedure.
53
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04 - 056
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ELECTRONIC MONUMENT SIGN
AT 3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD FOR (A) FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, (B)VARIANCE
FOR SIGN HEIGHT,AND (C) VARIANCE FOR COPY SURFACE AREA.
WHEREAS, the St. Anthony Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 20, 2004,
regarding a electronic monument sign(a) for a conditional use permit, (b)
variance for sign height, and(c) variance for copy surface area
BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission recommended Council approve said request by the City
of St. Anthony for the electronic sign because the sign height was due to the
incorporation of the city logo, the sign needs to be large enough for visibility
purposes, and the City was limited as to where the sign could be placed with the
obstruction and visibility issues along Silver Lake Road.
The Planning Commission recommended Council approve the Conditional Use
Permit with the following stipulations:
1) Flashing and animation prohibited;
• 2) Hours of operation are limited and shall be between the hours of 6 am
and 10 pm.;
3) Message changeability should be minimum required to accomplish the
purpose of the sign;
4) Sign aesthetics—such as color, size of reader board and sign,
construction materials, and landscaping plan;
5) Consideration should be given to safety and neighborhood;
6) Sign may only be used to promote items of general interest to the
community;
7) And adoption of Policy for Community Bulletin Board Sign.
Adopted this 27th day of Jam, 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
54
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Report Date: July 19, 2004
Agenda Section: VI, A
Meeting Date: July 27, 2004
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
39th Avenue Street and Utility Improvements; Phase ll. The bids for 39th
Avenue were opened on Friday, July 23rd. Todd Hubmer, WSB, will hand
out the bid tabulations at Tuesday Council Meeting.
MANAGER'S REVIEW:
This will-be Phase II bids which will be the curb and pavement from 39th
Avenue to the proposed park This will essentially provide a new street for
100 % of the commercial portions of the project.
Phase III will be the remaining road and utility work from the park to
Stinson. This phase will be bid out in the winter the construction to begin
middle of May 2005. The phased approach is to allow us to continue to
obtain the $750,000, in federal funds.
C
V
Michael Mornson
City Manager
55
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Report Date: June 20, 2004
Agenda Section: VI, B
Meeting Date: July 27, 2004
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Electronic Sign Funding and Policy.
MANAGER'S REVIEW:
I asked the Finance Director, Roger Larson, to explore funding options for
the purchase of the cities electronic sign:
In December 2003, the Kenzie Terrace TIF District was decertified. The
final payment to Hennepin County will be approximately $325,000, of which
in December 2004, the City will receive its portion back 1/3 or $108,225.
The sign is estimated to cost $45,000. The city has received fund
commitments from the Chamber of Commerce and Kiwanis in the amount
of $4,000. The City would need approximately $41 ,000, to fund the cost of
this sign.
Please find a resolution recommending approval of funding for the
electronic sign from the fund of the Kenzie District in an amount not to
exceed $50,000. In addition, a policy on use of the electronic sign is in the
Council Packet for informational purposes only.
bARIAM4
Michael Morrison
City Manager
56
POLICY FOR THE COMMUNITY BULLETIN BOARD SIGN
The City of St. Anthony has erected an Electronic Community Bulletin Board Sign at 3301
Silver Lake Road and desires to adopt a policy in regard to messages placed on the Electronic
Bulletin Board.
The following guidelines will be used in placing messages on the Bulletin Board:
1. Scope:
a. The Community Billboard is an electronic marquee located at 3301 Silver Lake
Road.
2. Purpose:
a. To communicate effectively with all City residents,businesses, visitors and
community members.
b. To give City functions and community organizations the publicity for which the
sign was intended.
c. To provide newsworthy information and notices of organizational events,public
meetings, activities, opportunities and programs.
3. Operation:
a. The activity or event to be announced must be taking place locally or originate in
St.Anthony.
b. Notice of private activities,without a public purpose, and private business
functions will not be displayed.
c. Messages will be in good taste, with the City reserving the right to make final
determination as to what will or will not appear on the sign,how it will be
presented and in what order it will appear.
d. Length of time the message will appear on the board will range from two to ten
business days.
e. Events will be placed on the board subject to the priority and judgment of the
City.
Electronic Sign 57
Page 2
4. Priority Order: — - -"
a. City Council meetings and public notices,
b. City events of a community-wide nature.
c. Events relating to school activities.
d. City Manager or his designee will have final approval of priority.
5. Political Announcements.
a. Only activities, meetings, etc. which are open to general public will be
announced. Activities or meetings where a fee is charged must have the fee
noted in the announcement.
b. No announcement may endorse, urge, support or attempt to influence the public with
regard to any candidate or issue, nor may any announcement be used for making
statements,promises, or any other campaign messages.
c The City Manager or his designee will have sole discretion and final approval for all
political announcements.
6. Procedure.
a. Requests for billboard space must be made in writing to the City Managers or
his designee two weeks prior to the Monday on which the marquees are
changed.
b. Upon approval, the City Manager or his designee, will provide copies of the
billboard announcement to the requesting person.
C. The format and style of messages presented on the community billboard will
be dictated by the physical limitations of the marquee.
7. Responsibility:
a. The City Manager bears ultimate responsibility for the enforcement and
interpretations of the policies outlined in this procedure.
b. The City Manager may designate an individual (s)who will be responsible
for the implementation and administration of the policies as outlined in this
procedure.
58
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04 - 058
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FUNDING OF THE ELECTRONIC
MONUMENT SIGN FROM KENZIE TERRACE TIF DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony recognizes the importance the
Community Electronic Board sign will be to the city;
WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce and Kiwanis have made financial commitments to the
City in the amount of$4,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
authorizes funds from the Kenzie Terrace TIF district fund to fund the Community Electronic Bulletin
Board Sign not to exceed$50,000.
Adopted this 27th day of July, 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
59
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Report Date: June 20, 2004
Agenda Section: VI, C
Meeting Date: July 27, 2004 (3'd Reading)
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Amend Dog Ordinance, Section 515
MANAGER'S REVIEW:
This version contains the amended Immunization for rabies text.
We have added a section 515.05 — Special Multiple Dog License.
This would allow the City ordinance to maintain the two (2) dogs restriction
but residents wishing to possess three (3) dogs could obtain a license with
the following conditions:
a.) Written approval of the occupants from at least seventy-five
percent (75%) If the residential property within 200 feet of the licensed
premised.
b.) Fenced Yard: The yard of the licensed premises if-fenced in such
a manner as to the restrain dogs on the premised from leaving the yard.
c.) Nuisance: Dogs kept on the licensed premised do not create a
nuisance by excess barking or by creating unsanitary conditions.
d.) Fee: Payment of a yearly license fee of $20.00.
e.) Denial of application: The Chief of Police may deny requests for
renewal of a special multiple dog license based upon complaints received
during the preceding year. In the even of such a denial, the applicant may
within ten (10) days of being advised of the denial, request, in writing, a
hearing before the City Council on the denial.
These conditions place the responsibility of having the extra dog with the
resident. All provisions for A thru E are only for a third dog.
Michael Mornson
City Manager
Version 3 60
Section 515 —DOGS
515.01 —License Required. All dogs over six (6)months of age, kept, harbored or maintained
within the City shall be licensed and registered. Dogs must be licensed on or before March l of
each year and pay the license fee set forth in Section 600 and the license shall be valid for two (2) ---
years. The applicant shall give the following information on forms provided by the City: owner's
name and address,name of dog,breed (if known), color, and sex of the dog.
515.02 - Immunization for Rabies.-No dog will be licensed unless the owner furnishes a current
rabies immunization record from a licensed veterinarian.
515.03 —Issuance of Tags; Duplicates. The Clerk will perform all duties according to State law in
issuing dog licenses. The Clerk will furnish for each licensed dog a metallic or plastic tag,
stamped or engraved with the register number of the dog and the year when registered. This
number corresponds with name and address of the owner. The owner or keeper of a dog must
place and keep around the dog's neck a collar on which the license tag is securely fixed. In case
the tag is lost or stolen, the owner or keeper of a dog may receive a duplicate tag and a duplicate
license upon presenting and surrendering to the Clerk the license or receipt issued when the dog
was registered. The dog owner must pay the required duplicated license fee at this time. The
duplicate license will be registered,numbered, described and issued as the original license. No
person will be granted a duplicate tag and license unless the original tag has actually been lost or
stolen. The Clerk may,before issuing a duplicate tag and license, require an affidavit to be made
and furnished by the applicant. The affidavit must state the fact that the tag has been lost or stolen
and is not at the time in the possession of the person.
515.04—Releasing IMpounded Dog. Any dog impounded when not properly licensed will be
release only on payment of the appropriate license fee. This may include the impounding fee, and
related costs, and the presentation of a current rabies immunization record from a licensed
veterinarian.
515.05—Special Multiple Dog Licenses. Upon issuance of a special multiple dog license (3) dogs
over tlfee-(3) six (6) months of age may be kept at a licensed premised upon compliance with the
following:
A. Written Approval: The filing of written approval of the occupants from at least
seventy five percent(75%) of the residential property abuttin g within 200 feet of the
licensed premised.
B. Fenced Yard: The yard of the licensed premises is fenced in such a manner as to the
restrain dogs on the premised from leaving the yard.
C. Nuisance: Dogs kept on the licensed premised do not create a nuisance by excess
barking or by creating unsanitary conditions.
D. Fee: Payment of a yearly license fee pursuant to Section 600.
E. Denial of Application: The Chief of Police may deny requests for renewal of a special
multiple dog license based upon complaints received during the preceding year. In the
event of such a denial, the applicant may, within ten(10) days of being advised of the
denial, request, in writing, a hearing before the City Council on the denial.
61
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Report Date: June 20, 2004
Agenda Section: VI, D
Meeting Date: July 27, 2004 (3'd Reading)
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Ordinance 1210.02 — Keeping of Certain Animals
MANAGER'S REVIEW:
Please review the amended City Ordinance 1210.02 to reflect the changes
in City Ordinance 515. Please consider waiving the first and second
readings of this City Ordinance change to correspond with the third reading
of the Dog Ordinance.
Michael Morrison
City Manager
62
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Ordinance 04-005
1210.02—Keeping of Certain Animals.
No person may keep swine, cattle, horses, goats, or more than two dogs or three dogs
allowed under City Ordinance 515 or fowl, within the City nearer than 500 feet to any
human habitation or platted land,without approval of the Council. The Council may,
before approving or denying any request for approval,request a report from the Health
Officer concerning the effect on public health.
63
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Report Date: July 19, 2004
Agenda Section: VI, E
Meeting Date: July 27, 2004
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Call a Special Session
MANAGER'S REVIEW:
The League of Minnesota Cities is asking all cities to request the
Governor's office the calling of a special session in order to deal with the
Local Government Aid issue.
See letter from the League as well as editorial from the Star & .Tribune.
a
q
Michael Mornson
City Manager
League of Minnesota Ckklb 4
145 University Avenue West St P -
Paul,MN 55103 2044
Loagm of AS nn"O&Cd," (651)281-1200 • (800)925-1122
Cases .� pa„�a Fax(651)281-1299 • TDD:(651)281-1290
www.Imnc.org
July 13, 2004
Dear Chief Appointed Officer,
The League Board of Directors is asking that you request the Governor and your legislators to
immediately resolve the confusion surrounding 2005 LGA amounts by correcting a drafting error
from the 2003 legislative session that failed to remove language related to the grandfather provision
of the LGA formula.
The legislature did not correct this error during the last session and as a result, the Governor has now
indicated that the state will certify 2005 LGA amounts based on the uncorrected statute rather than
on the intended changes. If this happens, it will alter about 8— 10%of the 2005 LGA distribution.
Over 600 cities will be affected with some cities receiving more and others less; in some instances
the differences are quite significant. The Department of Revenue's estimate showing how your city
would be affected is on the League's web site.
At a special meeting on June 10, 2004, the League Board unanimously adopted a position supporting
the administration of the LGA formula as originally intended by the Legislature. The League Board's
position also supports a special session to address the LGA technical correction if it is determined
that the Legislature's intent from the 2003 special session cannot be followed. This request was
conveyed to both the Governor and legislative leadership, but that has so far not yielded results.
The Governor could resolve the issue by directing that the 2005 LGA certification follow legislative
intent or the matter could be addressed in special session. If neither happens, some legislators are
suggesting that they will fix the formula early in the 2005 legislative session, before distribution
could occur under the current law. That is not a desirable solution because it creates unnecessary
confusion and uncertainty for all cities,regardless of whether they would lose or gain LGA under the
Governor's proposal.
Since cities must make budget and levy decisions yet this fall, they will be forced to guess what the
legislature might do later in their 2005 fiscal year. This may cause some cities to budget for higher
than necessary property taxes, cut services, or both. It may cause other cities to plan for more LGA
than they will in the end receive should the 2005 Legislature modify the LGA distribution. The
League's Board felt that this unnecessary ambiguity will create a guessing game for city officials that
should not be a part of the local budget process.
By way of background, there is no disagreement that the 2003 special session tax bill inadvertently
failed to delete a paragraph dealing with the LGA grandfather. In administering the formula last
summer, the Department of Revenue accepted letters from House Tax Chair Ron Abrams (R-
Minnetonka)and Senate Tax Chair Larry Pogemiller(DFL-Minneapolis)requesting that the 2004
distribution follow legislative intent with an apparent understanding that the 2004 Legislature would
fix the technical problem.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
65
Chief Appointed Officer
Page 2
July 13, 2004
During the 2004 legislative session,both the House and Senate tax bills contained that fix and in
committee discussions of the provision, no one testified in opposition to the elimination of the
paragraph. In addition,the House and Senate written summaries of the provision indicated that the
deletion of the paragraph was an inadvertent omission from the 2003 tax bill. Despite the non-
controversial nature of the provision, the House and Senate never negotiated a final tax bill and
therefore, the technical fix did not become law.
Please feel free to contact either Gary Carlson(gcarlsonna lmnc ora or 651-281-1255) or me
(imiller(�lmnc.org or 651-281-1205)if you have any questions. We would also appreciate hearing
the results,of any conversations with the Governor or legislators you may have.
Sincerely,
Jim Miller
Executive Director
1
66
Our perspective
Fix LGA glotc
Call a special sessi®n
Doing a sloppy job usually brings Time is running short. City lead-
consequences: The Legislature and ers must make key budget decisions
governor performed sloppily last by early next month.Absent further
session by not finishing the people's guidance from the state, many will
work Now the first consequences have to raise taxes or institute yet
loom as cities and towns prepare another round of layoffs and ser-
next year's budgets in an atmosphere vice cuts. Rather than eliminate
of total confusion. 40 police officers, St.. Paul Mayor
How did it happen? Legislators Randy Kelly said he would recom-
got all hot under the collar and left mend increasing property taxes by
town before they could fix a drafting 5 percent and naming the tax hike
glitch in the 2003 tax bill.That leaves after Pawlenty and legislative lead-
cities wondering how much local ers. Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak
government aid (LGA) they will-be said his budget will assume that
getting next year. Under the worst Pawlenty will change his mind and
scenario, Minneapolis will lose an fix the problem.
extra $12.5 million and St. Paul an Although her city stands to bene-
extra $3 million. Most outstate cit- fit,Minnetonka Mayor Karen Ander-
ies and towns will lose money, too. son urged the governor to act, one
St. Cloud stands to lose $1 million, way or the other. No city truly gains
Moorhead $700,000 and Austin from confusion and instability, she
$250,000,while the metro area's most said, adding that Pawlenty and leg-
prosperous suburbs — places like islative leaders would be up in arms
Eden Prairie, Burnsville, Woodbury if Congress had played a similar trick
and Maple Grove —.would gain a on Minnesota.She has a point.
modest windfall. Not so long ago, Minnesotans
Look at it this way: By failing to were lucky to have a responsible,so-
finish their work, the Legislature phisticated.Legislature to dominate
and governor will transfer $40 mil- a gaggle of sometimes unreliable
lion from the state's neediest cities local governments. Now the shoe is
to those with hardly a care in the on the other foot.An imperial Leg-
world. Inflicting comfort on the islature wields absolute power over
comfortable seems the new pattern the locals, but sophistication and
in Minnesota, and cynics might - reliability has shifted downward.
detect a Republican conspiracy.Ac- Now it's cities that tend to be led by
tually, both legislative houses fixed moderate, .competent public ser-
the glitch in their tax bills—but no vants while clownish partisanship
conference committee ever met to and dysfunction have overrun the
reconcile a final bill.. Capitol.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty could fix the The plain fact is that the people's
matter administratively by instruct- work has been left undone.A bond-
ing his departments to adhere to the ing bill awaits as interest rates creep
law's"intent"rather than its"letter," higher.Funding for public defenders
as he has done this year. But he has must be found. Cities.and towns
declined, citing the risk of a legal deserve to know how much state aid
challenge. That leaves the governor they will be getting.
with a heightened obligation to call Minnesotans have a tradition
a special session to force a legislative of pride in their state leaders, not
fix.He should do so soon: shame.Ma14 neine.
67
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 04 - 059
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING GOVERNOR PAWLENTY
TO CALL A SPECIAL SESSION TO RESOLVE THE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID ISSUE
WHEREAS, the St. Anthony City Council will request Governor Pawlenty to call a Special
Legislative Session to resolve the issue of Local Government Aid(LGA).
BE IT RESOLVED, the Mayor of St. Anthony will issue a letter to Governor Pawlenty on behalf of the
City stating the concerns of LGA and discrepancy between the Legislative action
and LGA grandfather.
Adopted this 27th day of July, 2004.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
E: FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Updated July 21, 2004
Obetinag Date Meeting Type Staff Items/Issues
August 10 Regular 5:30 pm Council Work session on 2005 budget
WSB Feasibility report for 2005 Street
Improvement Project
Res. Approve Election Judges for Primary
August 24 Regular Planning Three Rivers Park Signage Plan
September 14 Regular Res. Tax levy for 2005
September 28 Regular Planning Planning Commission issues of September 21
w ctober 12 Regular Res; Approve Election Judges
for General/Presidential Election
October 26 Regular Planning Planning Commission issues of October 19
November 9 Regular
November 23 Regular Planning Planning Commission issues of November 16
December 14 Regular
December 28 Regular Planning Planning Commission issues of December 21
•
August 2004
Monthly Planner — --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7.
Village Fest
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Pancake 7:00 pm Parks 5:30 pm Budget
Breakfast Commission Worksession
Meeting 7:00 pm Council
Meeting
• 15 1.6 17 18 19 20 21
700 pm
Planning
Commission
Meeting
22 23 24 25 .26 27 28
7:00 pm Council
Meeting
29 30 31 Ja12004 Sep.2004
Joint Meeting S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
with School 1 2 3 1 2 3 4
Board
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30
•
Printed by Calendar Creator for Windows on 7/19/2004
•
September 2004
Monthly Planner
Aug 2004 Oct 2004 1 2 3 4
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 .4 5 6 7 1 2
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31.
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Labor Day
Holiday
• 12 1300 pm Parks 1 1 S 16 1 7 18
Primary Election
Commission Day 8:00 pm
Meeting Council Meeting
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
7:00 pm
Planning
Commission
Meeting
26 27 28 29 30
7:00 pm Council
Meeting
•
Printed by Calendar Creator for Windows on 7/19/2004
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
July 27, 2004
Call to Order.
Roll Call.
I. Approval of July 27, 2004, H.R.A. Agenda.
II. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests,in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the
agenda.
A. Approve July 13, 2004, H.R.A. Minutes. (pp. 1-2)
B. Claims. (pp. 3)
III. Public Hearings.
IV. General Policy of Business of the H.R. A.
V. Staff Reports.
VI. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments.
VII. Information and Announcements.
VIII. Adjournment.
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
3 July 13, 2004
4
5 CALL TO ORDER.
6 Chair Hodson called the meeting to order at 8:11 p.m.
7
8 ROLL CALL.
9 Commissioners present: Chair Hodson; Commissioners Horst, Stille, Thuesen, and Faust.
10 Commissioners absent: None.
11 Also present: Executive Director Michael Morrison and City Attorney Jerome
12 Gilligan.
13
14
15 I. APPROVAL OF July 13, 2004 H.R.A. AGENDA.
16 Motion by Commissioner Faust,seconded by Commissioner Thuesen, to Approve the H.R.A.
17 Agenda of July 13, 2004.
18
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20
21 11. CONSENT AGENDA.
22 A. Approve June 22, 2004 H.R.A. Meeting Minutes.
23 B. Claims.
24
25 Motion by Commissioner Stille, seconded by Commissioner Thuesen, to Approve the Consent
26 Agenda.
27
28 Motion carried unanimously.
29
30 III. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
31 A. Resolution 04-011; Approval of H.R.A's 2003 Audit and Financial Report. Stuart
32 Bonniwell, CPA, and Roger Larson, Finance Director,presenting_
33 Stuart Bonniwell, CPA, reviewed for the Council the H.R.A.'s 2003 Audit Report.
34
35 Motion by Commissioner Horst, seconded by Commissioner Faust, to Adopt Resolution 04-011
36 Approving the Audit of the St. Anthony H.R.A. for the Year Ended December 31, 2003.
37
38 Motion carried unanimously.
39
40 IV. STAFF REPORTS.
41 None.
42
43 V. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
44 None.
45
46 VI. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
47 None.
48
2
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes
July 13, 2004
Page 2
1 VII. ADJOURNMENT.
2 Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m.
3
4 Motion carried unanimously.
S Respectfully submitted,.
6 Danielle Buckmeier
7 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
8
3
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
07/20/2004 10: 'Check Register GL540R-V06.60 PAGE 1
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
HRA1 HOUSING & REDEV CHECKING
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 5544 07/28/04 25,000.00
007105 COMMUNITY SERVICES 5545 07/28/04 26,087.78 _
009031 CONWORTH, INC. 5546 07/28/04 4,370.00
008698 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC 5547 07/28/04 12,520.00
.00001 EMR, INC. 5548 07/28/04 10,000.00
.00002 EMR, INC. 5549 07/28/04 10,000.00 .
008892 GOODWIN COMMUNICATIONS G 5550 07/28/04 1,330.00
008403 HELLICKSON/RAYMOND A. 5551 07/28/04 12,694.54
009001 KRAUS ANDERSON CONSTRUCT 555207/28/04 47,650.00 .
003150 ST ANTHONY MUNICIPAL LIQ 5553 07/28/04 56,412.00
008859 U.S. BANK 5554 07/28/04 50,118.75 ,
HOUSING & REDEV CHECKING 256,183.07 *++
Y'
Apache Plaza Redevelopment Jul-04
Total Costs Since Inception
Payments from Developers:
HillCrest Developmem $72,920.43
Met Council Grant $120,000.00
Pratt-Ordway $5117.237.2
$780,167.68
Total Expenses $072.908.18 071312004
Cost to HRA ($192.760.481
Dahlgmn
S erd w Ehlers 8,Associates
WSB b Associate .,.tin MB Com u.-.' .c o
I f I Northfield U n�e E
C Goodwin Com Dorsey,6 Whltne LBH Enainn e Little Suburbs Conwort
$7,402.72 $210.00 1 $2,714.50 08,00 $455.87 $1,615.00 $2062.50 $592.03 $27.90 $460.0
0$337.91 $1,505.00 $954.50 00 7 93 (57000 $1,483.00 $2,184.89$7,00288 $5,140.00
. "- $2,199.80 $1,140.00 $1,899.00 $4,545.67 $5,320.00$16.,388 $455.60 1 $942.0 $474.20 $2,260.00
$948.00 $95.00 $1.742.50 $10,615.96 54.370.00
$32.762.90 € $82.00 � $282.00 $7,098;79 $1,320.00
$25,78022 I $1,662211 I ! $860.00 $7,088.70 $770.0 $190.00 $9.804.90 $10,211.88 (15,290.00
$10,603.04 I $2,911.73 '! $4,061.00 1 - 5190.00 59,,217.0 $10.779.18
$1 09a,70 $9,355.00 $1,425.00 $78,217.50 $38,929.57
$6,369.70 $1,820.65 $5,611.03 $1,168.60 f $1,045.00 $51,029.50
$15,686.08 $3,460.00 $10,456.70 45$2 .13 $1,995.00 $15,537.05
$8,003 69 $5,100.00- 1 4
i `�.Q....56. ._ �_..-� $1,330.0 $23,517.41
§91,11821 $3,187.50 $498.50 $1,141.12 $9,975.00 $4,071.90
i $5,733.98 $2,767,50 $658.00 $1261.15
$12,770.25
$1,490.12 $5471.77 E (1,091.00 ;1.434.25
$7,832.7632.7 8
$5130.13 §2,882.50 $508.50 (13,434.0.5 $18,412.53
$1,774.75 $3,750.00 $94.00 $6,205.49
$2,561.32 $4,717.50 $188.00 $15,971.35
$3,75423 $3,853.50 $106.00 $2,647.50
$4.085.00 $108.00 $5.489.90
$1,645.50 $3,900.00 $2,088.20 $204,691.57
$5,539.18 $4,385.63 $1,187.33
$9,796.85 $5,850.00 $4,571.50
$11,660.14 $6,052.50 $265.00
$2,359.63 $5,587.50 $1,814.00
$221.92 $637.50 $9,277.50
$1,733.97 $3,342.54 $160.00
$2,429.72 $2,287.50 $1,431.00
$8,387.25 $2,137.50 $318.00
$7,019.47 $7,275.00 $636.00
$740.48 $656.25 $336.00
$552.29 $7,156.25 $8,427.75
$1,785.63 $2,816.25 5268.40
$239.25 $8,382.50 $4,310.50
$251.11 $2,318.75 $953.75
$1,356.22 $3,360.00 $9,111.75
$7,828.75 $6,168.75 $21,628.30
$2,479.50 $9,000.00 $381.50
$7.695.92 $22,25625 $218.00
$18,895.20 $1,968.75 $163.50
$61.00 $393.75 $218.00
$7,280.49 $17,940.00 $644.75
$10,54322 $8,045.00 $599.50
$1,428.07 $8,812.50 $272.50
$2,395.56 $150.00 $3.045.25
$2,066.58 $4,895.50 $113,068.21
$695.95 $8,115.00
$773.45 $12,712.50
(4,481.38 $2,538.25
$858.07 $1,560.00
$3,280.53 $375.00
8915 $5,600.00
$303,646.30 (2,778.75
$187.50
$800.00
$0.00
$4,506.25
$300.00
$1,662.50
$10,702.50
$150.00
$75.00
$2,885.49
$9,555.00
$4,826.25
$131.25
$261,643.36
Pratt-Ordway $687,237.26
Shaded Area Represents Before Pratt-Ordway Agreement Less:Expenditures ($710,364.01)
Retainage Balance ($123,126.76)