HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKETS 09211999 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII III
IIII
ioisoo
Box: 20
Folder: PL PACKETS 1999
Document: PL PACKETS 09211999
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 21, 1999
7:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 211 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA.
IV. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 17, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES.
V. DESIGNATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE
SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 CITY COUNCIL.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING.
A. LORA AND ROBERT DOOLAN, 3511 HARDING STREET NE; LOT
COVERAGE VARIANCE REQUEST
VII. OTHER BUSINESS.
A. REPORT FROM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR- SEPTEMBER
B. CONTINUED DISCUSSION RE: SALVATION ARMY PROPERTY;
SPRINGSTED REPORT.
VIII. COMMENTS.
A. COUNCILMEMBER FAUST
B. COMMISSIONERS
C. STAFF
1. DICK KRIER; FOLLOW-UP REPORT FOR ST. ANTHONY SHOPPING
CENTER- OCTOBER.
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
3 AUGUST 17, 1999
4 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
5 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Chair
6 Bergstrom.
7 II. ROLL CALL.
8 Commissioners Present: Chair Bergstrom; Commissioners Tillman, Hanson (arrived at 7:03
9 p.m.), Horst(arrived at 7:04 p.m.) Melsha, Hatch and Stille.
10 Commissioners absent: None.
11 Also present: City Manager Mike Momson.
12 III. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 17, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA.
13 Motion by Commissioner Melsha,second by Commissioner Tillman to approve the August 17, 1999
14 Planning-Co Meeting Agenda as presented.
15
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17 IV. APPROVAL OF JULY 20, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
18 Motion by Chair Bergstrom,second by Commissioner Melsha to approve the July 20, 1999 Planning
19 Commission Meeting Minutes as presented.
20
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22
23 Hanson arrived at 7:03 p.m.
24 V. DESIGNATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE AUGUST
25 24, 1999 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
26 Hatch agreed to attend the August 24, 1999 City Council Meeting.
27 Horst arrived at 7:04 p.m.
28 VI. PUBLIC HEARING.
29 A. 99-08 Mendota Homes,Inc. -3621 Old Highway 8: Conditional Use Permit;Preliminary
30 Plat; Final Plat; Rear Yard Variance.
31 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m.
32 Chair Bergstrom requested input from City Manager Mike Morrison. Morrison reviewed for the
33 Commission that in December 1997, a representative from Mendota Homes had presented a
34 request to the Planning Commission to rezone a vacant property at 3621 Old Highway 8 to
35 complete a multi-family housing project that is on adjacent property in Roseville. Both the cities
36 of St. Anthony and Roseville approved the rezoning.
37
d•
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 2
1 In May of this year, Staff was informed by Mendota Homes that the scope of the project had
2 changed, and that single-level townhomes were proposed for the site instead. Staff informed .
3 Mendota Homes that a conditional use permit would be necessary, as well as replatting the lot to
4 accommodate the two proposed townhome lots and a 37-foot variance to the rear yard_ setback
5 requirement.
6
7 Ms. Erin Mathem, as a representative for Mendota Homes, attended a concept review at the July
8 20`h Planning Commission meeting. The City of Roseville has given approval for the project.
9 Morrison stated that Mendota Homes has filed the appropriate applications and Staff has not
10 received any public comments.
11 Stille questioned the conditions that a motion on this subject would need to include. Momson
12 clarified t4rat a motion would need to include all conditions and designations that the
13 Commission wished to impose on this project.
14 Tillman stated that she understood that Roseville wanted the last four townhomes separated from
15 the townhomes on the St. Anthony side, partly because of dispatching fire or emergency
16 'situations. Morrison clarified that St. Anthony would probably respond to any 911 calls because
17 the City is closer to the project than Roseville. Tillman questioned whether appropriate
18 turnaround areas could be implemented into the project as a condition.
19 Chair Bergstrom introduced John Mathern, a representative from Mendota Homes, and invited
20 him to address the Commission.
21
22 Mr. Mathern briefly reviewed the history of the project, siting that a 30-unit senior building had
23 originally been proposed to the Commission two years ago. After neighborhood meetings and
24 input from surrounding residents, Mendota Homes determined that 12 units of one-level town-
25 homes were better suited to the long, narrow site. Mr. Mathern reminded the Commission that
26 an asphalt parking lot in disrepair is currently on the St. Anthony side of the project. Mendota
27 Homes would remove the asphalt and there would be less ground coverage and more green
28 space.
29
30 Mr. Mathern presented a drawing of the proposed townhome project and indicated that each
31 townhome would have a double-car garage and there would be additional guest parking. Each
32 townhome would have a different color for the building than the trim and two different roof
33 styles were shown. Additional landscaping would be provided that was not depicted on the
34 drawing in order to provide a shield for the residents in the Executive Condominiums. In short,
35 Mendota Homes is proposing to build a two-unit townhome in St. Anthony on a 13,000 square
36 foot site. Mr. Mathern added that he has received significant interest in the proposed project from
37 residents in the surrounding area.
38 Bergstrom inquired if restrictions would be imposed as far as residents modifying the outside of
39 the homes. Mr. Mathern stated that there would be an Architectural Control Committee in
C �A
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 3
1 charge of making any modifications. Mr. Mathern further stated that the Association governs the
2 maintenance of the buildings and individuals are not allowed to maintain or change the exterior
3 of the building.
4 Tillman asked if there would be a sign for the project. Mr. Mathern stated that there would be a
5 sign and a name for the project is being considered. He also mentioned there would be street
6 addresses for each individual unit and those would be developed as well.
7 Horst inquired if Roseville had instituted any variances. Mr. Mathern stated that this is a planned
8 unit development(PUD), and no variance was needed to his knowledge. Horst stated that the
9 project was going to require a variance from St. Anthony and a hardship would have to be pre-
10 sented in order to sway the City to grant the variances.
11
12 Mr. Mathern reviewed the options. He stated that the lot size is 13,000 square feet, which is suf-
13 ficient for a two-unit townhome. Morrison reminded Mr. Mathern that the City has a lot
14 coverage rule of 50%. Additionally, Mr. Mathern stated that if the City is opposed to granting
15 any lot variances, the impervious surfaces such as the roadway and driveways for the project
16 could be reduced. He confirmed that the issue in question is the side and rear yard setbacks.
17
18 Bergstrom stated that Mr. Mathern would need to determine if a variance was needed for the
19 50% lot coverage rule.
20 In considering the variances, Mr. Mathern suggested that the City consider that the townhome
21 appears to be in high demand by the surrounding community and that Mendota Homes is elimi-
22 nating the current asphalt surface that is in disrepair.
23 Mr. Mathern mentioned the possibility of placing a single family home on the site as opposed to
24 a two-unit townhome. However, constructing one unit on the St. Anthony side could
25 aesthetically deter from the other townhomes on the Roseville side. Hanson said that even if one
26 unit was constructed, it would appear that some variances would be required, or if not, that other
27 problems would be created. Mr. Mathern confirmed that the single unit would have to-be turned
28 and it would be different from the other townhomes on the Roseville side.
29 Horst asked for clarification as to the necessity of this project for St. Anthony. He stated that the
30 City Council must approve the project and exceptional reasons for constructing the project in St.
31 Anthony must be presented.
32 Bergstrom agreed stating that a clear hardship must be determined in order to present the project
33 to the City Council.
34 Horst asked Mr. Mathern if the entire project was contingent upon two units being constructed in
35 St. Anthony. Mr. Mathern responded that the St. Anthony side of the project is critical because
36 the asphalt area must be reclaimed and the total number of units projected were needed to help
37 defray the cost.
;• r
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 4
1 Horst reviewed what Mr. Mathern had stated, but was concerned about the operation of the
2 Associations. Mr. Mathern felt the Associations were responsible and well organized.
3
4 In short, Mr. Mathern felt that the proposed townhome project is important to the community,
5 particularly because the townhomes are one level and they would accommodate residents who
6 wish to stay in the community. It would also alleviate any concerns the City had about the
7 disrepair of the current asphalt in place.
8 Bergstrom thanked Mr. Mathern for his presentation.
9 Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. and asked for discussion from the Com-
10 missioners.
11 Tillman asked for clarification about the conditional use of the property. Bergstrom stated that
12 the property is zoned as an R-4,but the request from Mendota Homes provides the Commission
13 an opportunity to impose conditions upon the property.
14 Tillman was concerned about access to the property for the fire department or emergency staff.
15 Bergstrom stated that the Fire Chief would need to be consulted for clarification.
16 Horst clarified that he felt there was value to the proposed project, but is concerned about the
17 justification for variances.
18 Bergstrom felt that the significant issue at hand was the rear and/or side yard setback variances.
19 Horst expressed that he felt more comfortable in finding a way to justify a variance as opposed to
20 changing the style of the townhome only for the St. Anthony side.
21 Bergstrom mentioned that the lot is an odd shape, and to compound the problem, there is a city
22 and county boundary on one side of the lot. That boundary would intimidate some developers
23 from attempting any project. Bergstrom reminded the Commission that the lot is currently in
24 disrepair due to the condition of the asphalt.
25 Stille agreed with Mr. Bergstrom and stated that there is more projected green space on the St.
26 Anthony side as opposed to the Roseville side. He mentioned that City Attorney William Soth
27 had alluded to the fact that the transaction would be difficult, but could be accomplished.
28 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Horst that the Planning Commission recommend approval of
29 the Mendota Homes proposal, including the Conditional Use Permit allowing an R-3 use in an R-
30 4 district with the following conditions:
31 1. The land to be subdivided would include two lots in St. Anthony in Hennepin County,
32 and 10 lots in Roseville in Ramsey County.
33 2. The developer would be required to provide a preliminary plat with sewer, water, ease-
r (t
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 5
1 ments, drainage, and all other information required under Section 1500.2.
2 3. The floor area ratio must be in conformance with the codes pursuant to Section 1630.05,
3 Subd. 7.
4 4-. The lot coverage must not exceed the maximum of 50%.
5 5. A Declaration of Covenants must be submitted to the City for review in a form required
6 under the Minnesota Common Interest Ownership Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
7 515B.
8 6. Easements must be provided for utilities and drainage where necessary under Section
9 1500.05, Subd. 2.
10 7. The City must be provided information regarding the title to the property in the form of a
11 Commitment for Title Insurance or Title Insurance Policy.
12 8. The City must be reimbursed for any expenses incurred in relation to this project.
13 9. Emergency egress and ingress must be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief.
14 10. - T11e Commission would recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat submitted at the
15 Commission's August 17, 1999 meeting.
16 11. The Commission would recommend a rear-yard setback variance of 20 feet and a side
17 yard setback variance of 12 feet, due to the following circumstances:
18 a. The odd shape of the lot in question.
19 b. The set back from County Road 88.
20 C. To maintain order between both cities and counties.
21 d. The character of the lot could be changed since the property is somewhat aban-
22 doned and in disrepair.
23 e. That it would be a detriment to develop a project in St. Anthony that is aestheti-
24 cally different from a project in Roseville.
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26 Bergstrom stated that the Mendota Homes project would be on the City Council's agenda for the
27 August 24, 1999 meeting. Bergstrom encouraged Mr. Mathern to attend the meeting and com-
28 mended Mr. Mathern on his informative presentation.
29 B. 99 - 09 Jim Furseth, 2550 Highway 88: Conditional Use Permit
30 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m.
31 Morrison reviewed the background of the project by stating that Mr. Furseth was the prospective
32 owner of the former Town and Country site. Mr. Furseth has filed applications for a conditional
33 use permit for a recreational vehicle business at that site. The conditional use permit is required
34 because Mr. Furseth's business would include service and repair of recreational vehicles and
35 motorcycles sales. Morrison stated that Mr. Furseth is amenable to working with the new shop-
36 ping center owners on proposed renovations to the center.
37 Morrison stated that Richard Krier, RLK-Kuusisto, had been requested by the City to comment
38 on the proposed conditional use permit. Morrison referred to Mr. Krier's letter of August 11,
,9 1999 outlining his review of the project. Mr. Krier suggested that the City impose the following
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 6
I conditions if approval of the conditional use permit is granted:
2 1. Vehicles awaiting service, products, and parts are to be stored inside the building;
3 2. All trash, garbage storage and trash compactor should be enclosed;
4 3. All mechanical equipment placed on top of the building should be screened or camou-
5 flaged with the same material and color as the primary building;
6 4. The site should conform to the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Design
7 Guidelines, including lighting, screening, landscaping, pedestrian amenities, and parking.
8 Morrison clarified that Mr. Furseth has applied for two requests, which are the conditional use
9 permit and the comprehensive sign package. Morrison stated that the concept presented at the
10. Planning Commission meeting was modified somewhat from the plan presented at an earlier
11 meeting. The difference is that more green space has been added.
12 Bergstrom commended Staff for their dedication in providing up-to-date information and for
13 keeping the project moving.
14 Morrison stated that the new concept presented is named the "St. Anthony Shopping Center
15 Master Plan." Once the Plan is approved, the negotiation process would begin. Morrison said
16 Staff is hopeful that 1-'/2 acres of green space with a gazebo would be in place for next year.
17
18 Hatch questioned whether the new owners were in favor of enclosing the trash bin and if over-
19 story trees would be utilized as a screen instead. Morrison responded by stating this was an issue
20 to be discussed.
21 Hanson asked if the City is preparing to enter into negotiations with the public regarding the pur-
22 chase of City-owned property such as the liquor store and the Stonehouse Restaurant. Bergstrom
23 suggested the Commission return to that issue later in the meeting.
24 Morrison stated that he had received approximately ten telephone calls from residents objecting
25 to the approval of the conditional use permit. The concerns mentioned were increased noise
26 levels, and motorcycles and snowmobiles being driven through the residential community for test
27 drives.
28 Bergstrom introduced Mr. James Kellison of Kellison Co. and invited him to address the
29 Commission.
30 Mr. Kellison drew attention to a site plan he presented. He stated that the former Town and
31 Country building is in disrepair and it is Mr. Furseth's vision to upgrade and renovate the build-
32 ing. Mr. Furseth is one of the owners of a business entitled "The Hitching Post," which has three
33 current locations and has been in business for over 11 years. Mr. Furseth is closing the University
34 store and moving that business to St. Anthony.
35 Mr. Kellison stated that the business would offer sales, service, and accessories for snowmobiles,
I i7
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 7
1 jet skis, ATV's and motorcycles. Mr. Kellison further stated that Mr. Furseth has been amenable
2 to working with the foreseeable plans for the shopping center.
3 Mr. Kellison pointed out that the site plan presented does not specifically include landscaping,
4 lighting, or redevelopment of some of the site areas since-the area is under review and discussion
5 with the City. Since Mr. Furseth would begin construction in September, the City's plan could
6 be incorporated once plans have been approved.
7 Mr. Kellison had a concern over the proposed trash enclosure for the business. He stated that the
8 business generates a significant amount of cardboard and the easiest way to dispose of the trash
9 is with a 30 yard enclosed trash bin on the south side of the building. Kellison demonstrated that
10 it was impracticable to complete a fully enclosed structure for a trash bin because the bin would
11 be completely carried away by a trash truck and replaced with a new one. Mr. Furseth intends to
12 build-a semen wall to shield the bin from immediate view.
13 Bergstrom stated that the residents of the Autumn Woods Apartments currently have an unattrac-
14 tive view of the site and the proposed modifications would be an improvement.
15 Mr. Kellison stated that the new rooftop air conditioning units would be considerably smaller
16 than the units in place now. The intent is to choose a color for the units that would blend with
17 the building. Mr. Kellison felt blending the color would be a superior method over the proposed
18 construction of a screening wall for the units.
19 Mr. Kellison clarified that Mr. Furseth is in agreement with all of Mr. Krier's comments, except
20 for the total enclosure of the trash bin and screening wall for the air conditioning units.
21 Hatch asked if there would be a separate dumpster for recyclable materials. Mr. Kellison stated
22 that it is the hauler's responsibility to separate the trash from the recyclable items and that one
23 bin would be utilized for both.
24 Horst asked for clarification regarding proposed screening for the trash. Mr. Kellison stated that
25 a screen wall would be placed at the south end of building about eight feet high. Horst reiterated
26 that the dumpsters are not attractive and he would like to see some screening for the trash bin.
27 Mr. Kellison said that the Master Plan provided for overstory trees close by that could benefit
28 some screening for the trash bin. Mr. Kellison plans on discussing with the City definite plans
29 for financial responsibility of landscaping.
30 Horst said he is satisfied with the proposed screening and also believed the air conditioning units
31 would be camouflaged sufficiently with coordinating color and it would not be necessary to build
32 a screening wall around each unit.
33 Tillman questioned whether test driving for jet skis, motorcycles or other equipment would be
34 allowed. Mr. Kellison responded that snowmobiles and jet skis are difficult to test drive and that
f 1
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
.Page 8
1 motorcycles would probably be test driven on Highway 88 after they are repaired. Tillman clari-
2 fied that she is concerned about test driving of new motorcycles through residential
3. neighborhoods.
4 Mr. Kellison stated that motorcycles are not the dominant sales force for the business. Hanson
5 asked if the motorcycles and other vehicles would be displayed outside-during the day. Mr.
6 Kellison stated that it is a possibility, although there are not any current plans.
7 Horst mentioned that he did not believe the City would allow potential buyers to test drive vehi-
8 cles around the parking lot of the business.
9 Bergstrom thanked Mr. Kellison for his presentation and information.
to Chair-Bergstrom opened the public hearing.at 8:50 p.m.
11 Mr. John Mendotti was concerned about noise being retained within the building and he inquired
12 about the implementation of soundproof walls. Mr. Mendotti stated that he is in favor of the
13 project, but wished to express his concerns about the level of noise from vehicles being repaired.
14 Bergstrom stated that the Commission would reserve the right to impose restrictions if the noise
15 level became a nuisance and this reserved right should be implemented into the conditional use
16 permit.
17 Hanson mentioned that the hours of operation for the business should be a conditional use as
18 well.
19 Rose Fitzgerald has received many telephone calls from residents stating significant concerns
20 about noise levels and the proposed hours of service for repairs of vehicles. Ms. Fitzgerald
21 inquired whether the building would be aesthetically improved.
22
23 Mr. Kellison responded that he was unsure of the business hours or the service department's
24 hours, but would assume the business would be open six days a week during normal and custom-
25 ary shopping center hours. He also answered that the building would be renovated and redeco-
26 rated.
27 Ms. Fitzgerald asked about the timeline for the proposed landscaping and if the Autumn Woods
28 Apartment residents would be subject to a view of the trash dumpster.
29 Morrison stated that certain landscaping would be required from the developer and an exact plan
30 has not been developed yet. Morrison suggested the City enter into a Developer's Agreement to
31 place conditions on the overall landscaping of the project. Morrison stated that it is the intent
32 that the City, the shopping center owner, and the owner of The Hitching Post meet to implement
33 the landscaping by next spring.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 9
1 Ms. Fitzgerald reiterated her concern about the trash dumpster being within view. Bergstrom
2 responded that within a year, he believed the view of the property in general would be signifi-
3 cantly improved.
4 Horst wished to respond to Ms. Fitzgerald's question regarding service hours. Horst asked Mr.
5 Kellison if the service hours would be shorter than the business hours. Mr. Kellison responded
6 that he believed the service hours would be on an eight-hour shift.
7 Stille asked Mr. Kellison if the doors to the building would be left open during repair, or did the
8 business have an enclosed ventilation system in place so that noise could be contained inside the
9 building. Mr. Kellison responded that the business had a complete ventilation system required
to by Code and that all doors could be closed to alleviate noise concerns. Mr. Kellison wished to
11 state that the business would sell all new equipment.
12 Jim Higgins, 2712 St. Anthony Boulevard, asked about the future location of the liquor store and
13 the fire station. He questioned whether the Commission is jeopardizing the ability to plan for
14 these locations in the future.
15 Bergstrom responded that the Commission was attempting to move along a viable project, but
16 not at the expense of stalling any projected plans for the liquor store or fire station. Mr. Hagens
17 asked if the Commission was hoping that other retail would arrive in anticipation of available
18 space. Bergstrom clarified that the liquor store and fire station are at the other edge of the
19 property and he did not believe this would be an issue.
20 Dan Ganley, 3201 Wendhurst, asked if the City would be responsible for the cost of maintaining
21 the proposed green space. Morrison clarified that maintenance of the green space would be a
22 separate contract. Ganley asked if the conditional use permit allowing the sale of recreational
23 vehicles would apply towards other merchants in the shopping center. Bergstrom clarified that
24 the current application would not provide for unusual allowances and that The Hitching Post
25 would be conducting business as allowed under current requirements.
26
27 Horst stated that Mr. Krier had suggested the shopping center had retail viability and that a
28 Master Plan has been developed in accordance with those suggestions. However, Horst cau-
29 tioned that all plans have not been finalized and it is the intent to make the shopping center into a
30 showplace for the City and the surrounding area.
31 Richard Kriber requested clarification regarding any auto repair taking place at The Hitching
32 Post. Mr. Kellison clarified that the classification of auto repair was used on the application
33 because there would be trailer hitches installed on vehicles. Mr. Kellison assured Mr. Kriber that.
34 auto repair would not take place at The Hitching Post.
35 Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 9:10 p.m. and requested input from the
36 Commissioners.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 10
1 Hanson stated that a City Councilmember had contacted him with a concern about noise levels
2 possibly generated from The Hitching Post. Hanson felt Mr. Kellison had adequately addressed
.3 the issue and he was comfortable reporting back to'the Councilmember.
4 Horst,expressed that he was concerned about having a potentially noisy business in town, yet he
5 was also concerned about alienating potential businesses from St. Anthony. Horst stated that
6 most businesses within the shopping center, with the exception of food service businesses, are
7 closed within reasonable hours. However, he felt that a restriction on hours could be imposed in
8 the conditional use permit if necessary.
9 Stille asked if hours of service limitations could be placed for the business.
10 Mr. Kellison mentioned that there needs to be some flexibility in allowing customers to pick up
11 repaired vehicles, but that vehicles would not be repaired during late hours. Horst clarified that
12 picking up vehicles is different from repairing vehicles.
13 Bergstrom asked Mr. Kellison for clarification of service and business hours for presentation to
14 the Council. Mr. Kellison suggested business hours from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and service
15 hours from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
16 Morrison recommended that the conditional use permit be approved on the conditions set forth in
17 Mr. Krier's August 11, 1999 letter, with the exception of requiring an enclosure for the trash
18 dumpster, and that a Developer's Agreement would be required to be executed prior to approval
19 of a building permit.
20 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Horst that the Commission approve the conditional use permit,
21 with conditions set forth in Richard Krier's letter of August 11, 1999, for 2550 Highway 88 for
22 the sale of motorcycles and vehicle repair as defined by installation of trailer hitches. The
23 Planning Commission recommends approval as presented in the packets subject to the following
24 conditions:
25 1. All vehicles, merchandise, and parts storage should occur in the building. Outside
26 storage would not be allowed.
27 2. An eight-foot high screen wall would be placed at the south side of the building pursuant
28 to Mr. Kellison's projections to screen the bin from the adjacent property.
29 3. The mechanical equipment on top of the building shall be painted in a color to blend the
30 equipment with the building.
31 4. The building should conform to the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project Area Design
32 guidelines including building facade, signs, lighting, screening, landscaping, plant mate-
33 rial, pedestrian amenities (such as paving, benches, trash containers and bike racks).
34 5. An executed Developer's Agreement shall be presented prior to the City issuing a Certifi-
35 cate of Occupancy.
36 6. Hours of operation for The Hitching Post shall be 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. for business
37 hours, and 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. for service hours.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 11
1 7. There shall not be any test drives allowed on the property.
2 8. The perimeter between this land and the residential land uses to the west should be land-
3. scaped with overstory trees.
-4 9. Part of the pedestrian greenway should be provided in the back part of the lot and in con-
5 - junction with the other shopping area to the proposed village green near Highway 88.
6 10. The parking lot should be resurfaced.
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8 Bergstrom invited Mr. Kellison to discuss the Comprehensive Sign Plan for The Hitching Post.
9 Mr. Kellison reviewed that Mr. Furseth has specific marketing agreements with suppliers and
10 that the business must include designated signage. Mr. Kellison submitted a proposal and
11 drawings that he believed to be sensitive to the City's preferences as well as considerate of the
12 shopping-enter. The plan indicated there would five signs, each 3 feet by 12 feet. Mr. Kellison
13 mentioned that if the comprehensive sign plan was approved, The Hitching Post would agree not
14 to install any window signage.
15
16 Mr. Kellison mentioned that Mr. Furseth had requested consideration of a single monument near
17 the edge of the parking lot, which would illustrate the signs required in the marketing agreement.
18 Morrison stated that the City would allow for each business to incorporate a ground sign of a
19 maximum of eight feet tall, but a monument sign (or pylon) would require additional considera-
20 tion.
21 Horst mentioned that he believed the pylon proposal was not complying with the Commission's
22 original intent, and would cause additional study and discussion.
23 Hanson stated that he felt comfortable with allowing wall signage as opposed to pylon signage.
24 He questioned whether a restriction could be imposed to turn the signs off at midnight; however,
25 he added that the signs would be facing away from any residential areas.
26 Mr. Kellison reminded the Commission that Mr. Furseth agreed not to install any window
27 signage if the proposed Comprehensive Plan was approved.
28 Motion made by Horst, seconded by Bergstrom,to recommend approval of the Comprehensive
29 Sign Package as proposed, recognizing that excess.signage would be present, but understanding
30 that installation of window signage would not take place.
31 Motion carried unanimously.
32 Bergstrom encouraged Mr. Kellison to attend the City Council meeting on August 24, 1999 to
33 support the Comprehensive Sign Plan.
34 VII. OTHER BUSINESS.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 12
1 A. Discussion of City Manager's Memo Re: Salvation Army Property.
2 City Manager Mike Morrison stated that the City had considered a possible public purchase of
3 the property, but decided against that idea because it would require a referendum. Morrison
4 explained that the City's debt limits are too high to hold a referendum, so the matter was referred
5 to the school district. The City Council has tabled this matter. Additionally,.the City had
6 previously hired an appraisal company in the event a public.purchase would be considered. The
7 appraisal is expected in about one week. Morrison stated that the Heart of the Earth Native
8 American Indian School is currently in negotiations to purchase the property and the closing
9 should occur by June 2000. Momson explained that the City was originally concerned that a
10 potential developer would purchase the property and, consequently, the moratorium was
11 implemented.
12 Morrison stated that the City Council requested the Planning Commission's input and felt that the
13 Commission could be in a position to make recommendations.
14 Bergstrom felt it was not appropriate at this time to expend significant amounts of money investi-
15 gating the project, but felt postponing the discussion until more information became available
16 would be suitable. The information contained in the appraisal could be considered as a starting
17 point.
18 Morrison recommended that the issue be kept on the Commission's docket to be discussed when
19 additional information became available.
20 Bergstrom agreed and deferred discussion to a later time.
21 Bergstrom wished to return to Hanson's earlier question regarding possible negotiations with the
22 Stonehouse and liquor store. Morrison clarified that he had received input, but is reluctant to pre-
23 sent the proposed plan until further information became available. He stated that negotiations are
24 not currently being implemented, but that the City is open to proposals.
25
26 Hanson asked about the City's long-term goal for the fire station. Morrison stated that the fire
27 station is structurally sound and there is no reason to relocate the station at this time. The Fire
28 Chief had previously stated that he wished to retain the current location because most of the fire
29 fighters live in an area close to the station.
30 VIII. FUTURE BUSINESS.
31 A. Dick Krier; Follow-Up Report for St. Anthony Shopping Center- September.
32 Morrison stated that Richard Krier, RLK-Kuusisto, would present design standards to the Com-
33 mission at the meeting in September.
34 B. Report from Public Works Director- September.
35 Bergstrom stated that Public Works Director Jay Hartman would present a discussion in
36 September updating the Commission on capital improvements, plans for expenditures, landscap-
37 ing, trees, etc.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999
Page 13
1 Hanson mentioned the possibility that the budget first needed to be approved. Bergstrom
2 differed by stating that Mr. Hartman needed to present ideas to the Commission prior to the
3 budget approval.
4 IX. COMMENTS.
5 Hanson suggested that the Commission make inquiries about possible businesses that are not
6 complying with the designated conditional use permit. Hanson stated that he had received a
7 request from a City Councilmember to investigate compliance issues. Also, Hanson questioned
8 whether the noise issue had been resolved for The Hitching Post and what recourse, if any, the
9 City had for the future.
10 Bergstrom stated that any test driving would fall under the restrictions of the conditional use per-
11 mit. - ---
12 Hanson wished to compliment the Parks Commission on the positive atmosphere that has been
13 created and mentioned the press had been optimistic as well.
14 Melsha was pleased with the progress being made on the Plan for the development of the St.
15 Anthony Shopping Center and The Hitching Post.
16 Horst commented that there are always issues to be resolved when a new business arrives in the
17 community. He perceived that The Hitching Post would not be as noisy as anticipated. He
18 understood the residents' concerns, but also felt that the City must be fair and that the Commis-
19 sion needed to keep an objective view of the Plan.
20 Bergstrom commended Staff for the dedication in,bringing the St. Anthony Shopping Center
21 Plan into place. He agreed with Melsha that the outlook is positive for the Plan.
22 Stille questioned the implementation of a movie theatre for Apache Plaza. He also suggested that
23 the Commission lean towards being proactive, rather than reactive, toward the development.
24 Mornson commented that the company interested in implementing a movie theater has
25 withdrawn. However, another theater is considering the project. Momson felt that plans should
26 be more evident over the winter.
27
28 Momson mentioned that the City Council broadcasts its meetings through cable television. The
29 Council had suggested that the Planning Commission and the Parks Commission consider broad-
30 casting the meetings as well. Bergstrom responded that would be an unnecessary expense to the
31 City at this time.
32 Tillman suggested that the City's web site post the minutes of the meetings for the community's
33 review. Momson stated that would be a suggestion to consider.
34
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 17, 1999._
Page 14
1 X. ADJOURNMENT.
2 Motion by Horst, second by Bergstrom to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 p.m.
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4 Respectfully submitted,
5 Sue Selseth
6 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 21, 1999
TO: Planning Chair and Commissioners
FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant
ITEM: 99-10 Lot Coverage Variance Request for 3511 Harding
Street N.E., Lona and Robert Dolan, owners.
BACKGROUND:
Mr. and Mrs. Doolan, 3511 Harding St. N.E., have submitted a Petition for Variance to the R-
1 residential lot coverage restriction of 35%. They are proposing to construct a deck and patio
structure in the backyard area of their property but in order to do this project, they will need a
variance for the additional 10.5% lot coverage.
ANALYSIS:
Currently, their lot coverage is 37.8%, which already exceeds the City's restriction of 35%.
City records indicate that the structures were originally constructed in 1957 and therefore
existed prior to the City's Ordinances being codified.
Because the detached garage sits so far from the house in the rear yard, their driveway is
1,275.75 SF or almost half of the total square footage of impervious surfaces on this property.
In their application, the property owners have indicated that they desire a patio and deck area
so that they can enjoy the amenities that they have worked for so many years to achieve.
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that several conditions must be satisfied for
approval of this variance request. As such, no variance will be granted unless the evidence
presented discloses that strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause undue hardship
because the property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance. This parcel is
-unique in that the-detached garage was constructed so farl back on the Jot and thus-requires an
exceptionally long driveway to access it. In its current state, the owners feel that they are
restricted from putting their property to its most reasonable, greatest or best use.
The circumstances causing the hardship must also not be created by the owner. As reported by
Staff, the current excessive coverage of their lot was already in place before the City's Zoning
Ordinance was adopted, therefore this hardship was not created by the current owner.
The variance, if granted, also must not alter the essential characteristics of this residential area.
Several neighbors called City Hall as a result of receiving their notification about the public
hearing and were very supportive of the Doolan's project. Economic considerations are not a
basis for this lot coverage variance request.
Another issue that Staff noted in reviewing the project plans is that the proposed deck extends
approximately 3 feet into the north sideyard. Staff has attempted to contact the Doolans about
this issue, but have been unable to find anyone at home or to leave a message.
Date:
Fee: -X D G�
R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance.
Applicant: L r�- lZ�b � ���1 Phone: c- I z. -7%k-097V
Address: 351� N�.�« , 5�. N.F 5 � N `5-D-
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): O�'h
Legal Description of property proposed for variance:
Street Address:
Presently Zoned:
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets,if
necessary.
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical.conditions of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance would relieve an undue hardship as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced. f
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to,this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district.
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
Signature of Applicant
I
r 1
ek
CG
A
LA
tA 1 � o- L r
S s
o � G s
r
� _ s
1 l
LA A
Yl 711
4 I
,' '� > �e A f ) � -- - � _.•_tin -� 7
J
I
r e
V
CL
- - -- - - -- - --- ....- - -- - --- ---._..- - -
it ;
CD
h
c �
It
G -
G N �!
r
.sn w
p
- - fi
I
1 �
1 •
M1
�
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 21, 1999
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: TAX IMPACT STUDY FOR POSSIBLE PURCHASE OF
SALVATION ARMY PROPERTY
Attached is the tax impact study that Springsted completed for the City and
School District.
Following is a brief summary of Springsted's findings:
1. A referendum would be required.
2. The School would have to hold the referendum because they have more
capacity - $40 million to the City's $6 million.
3. The impact on property valued at $150,000 would be $413 per year for
20 consecutive years. This assumes a $14 million referendum to
purchase the property.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact.me.
Tax Impact Study — Phase 1
City of St. Anthony and St. Anthony-
New Brighton School District, Minnesota
June 23, 1999
Corporate Headquarters:
85 East Seventh Place
Suite 100
St.Paul,MN 55101-2887
(651)223-3000
(651)223-3002 Fax
Kansas City Office: Minneapolis Office:
7211 West 98th Terrace 520 Marquette Avenue
Suite 100 Suite 900
Overland Park,KS 66212-2257 Minneapolis,MN 55402
(913)345-8062 (612)333-9177
(913)381-8236 Fax (612)349-5230 Fax
Des Moines Office: Milwaukee Office: Washington,D.C. Office:
100 Court Avenue 8651 North Port Washington Road 2121 K Street NW
Suite 204 Suite A Suite 800
Des Moines,IA 50309-2200 Milwaukee,WI 53217 Washington,D.C. 20037
(515)244-1358 (414)247-8686 (202)261-6505
(515)244-1508 Fax (414)247-8649 Fax (202)261-6504 Fax
E-mail: advisors@spiingsted.com
Fable of Contents
Page(s)
A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY......................................... 1
Collection and Review of Records and Documents
Primary Assumption
B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. 1
C. EXISTING DEBT LEVELS AND DEBT CAPACITIES ...................... 1
Review of Current Debt levels and Debt Capacities
D. TAX IMPACT OF DIFFERING ACQUISITION COSTS..................... 1-2
Property Tax Impacts of Acquiring the Salvation Army Property
E. SUMMARY ....................................................:................................... 1
Summary of Factors for Decision-Making
Appendices
ExistingDebt .................................................................................. APPENDIX
Debt Structure for Each of the 6 Acquisition Costs.....................:... APPENDIX II
Executive Summary
St. Anthony Community"Brainstorming" Session
"Possibilities for Salvation Army Camp"............:.....................:.... APPENDIX III
Glossary......................................................................................... APPENDIX IV
®SPRINGSTED \.stanthoTtxi
Section 1
INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY
First-tier cities in large metropolitan areas are faced with the challenge of how to grow and
maintain their communities' quality of life when 'they become landlocked. The City of
St. Anthony (the "City") and the St. Anthony-New Brighton School District (the "District") (jointly
the "Community"), have an opportunity for growth as a result of the Salvation Army listing for
sale land that has heretofore been used as a campground.
The City and the District authorized this Tax Impact Study for the purpose of analyzing the
impacts to the Community as a result of acquiring land that is currently owned by the Salvation
Army. The Study has been divided into two phases. This first phase of the study examines the
property tax impact at several different acquisition costs. The second phase of the Study will
identify and outline options for use and development of the property by the District and the City.
Upon completion of this Phase I Study, the City and the District will have a summary written
document with supporting analysis relating to the property tax impact of acquiring the Salvation
Army Property. The Study includes an examination of both the City's and the District's debt
levels, an identification of the financing options for purchasing the property, and the resulting
property tax impacts to the taxpayers in the Community.
Collection and Review of Records and Documents
The gathering of a number of City and District records and documents was necessary for the
completion of this Study. Phase I of the Study required the collection and review of the City's
and the District's outstanding debt and their current debt capacity status. The collection of this
information allowed Springsted Incorporated to create baseline information, which was critical to
the analysis required in the Study.
Primary Assumption
The impact of financing options has been limited to a bond issuance. The reason for this is
two-fold: 1) other options for up-front financing such as those.suggested at the "Brainstorming"
session on April 26, 1999 (included in Appendix B) were not identified by either the City or the
District as immediately available options for the purpose of this Study, 2) bonding is the primary
method that is available to both municipalities and school districts to raise large sums of_money
in an equitable, efficient, and effective_manner.
2 SPRINGSTED lstanthoTtxi Page 1-1
Section 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City has $6,715,786 of debt capacity available, while the District has $40,275,635.
The tax impact to a typical property owner with property valued at $150,000 (referendum
market value), paid over 20 years for each of the six scenarios, is as follows:
Referendum Tax Impact
$ 9 million $272
$10 million $301
$11 million $329
$12 million $357
$13 million $385
$14 million $413
If the Community chooses to acquire the Salvation Army property, the District, due to its larger
debt capacity, could issue the debt most cost-effectively.
The Salvation Army property is currently exempt from the tax base. The final disposition of the
property and its tax status could have an effect on the full impact to the Community.
® SPRINGSTED \stanthoTtxi Page 2-1
Section 3
EXISTING DEBT LEVELS AND DEBT CAPACITIES
Review of Current Debt Levels and Debt Capacities
In Minnesota, the authority to issue municipal bonds is found in Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 475. Municipalities, except cities of the first class and school districts, may not incur
debt in excess of 2% of the market value of taxable property in the municipality. The limit is
10% in first class cities and school districts. Subtracted from this overall 2% limit are almost all
debt obligations for which some other source of revenue is pledged as security. Thus,
improvement bonds, tax increment bonds, utility revenue bonds, pure revenue bonds, and
similar bonds may be issued without regard to the debt limit. The result is that, with only a few
exceptions, the only types of obligations subject to the debt limit are general obligation bonds
payable solely from ad valorem property taxes. The legal debt limit has nothing to do with the
practical debt limit of a municipality which is the debt burden beyond which the creditworthiness
of the municipality is put in question.
The City
As stated above, municipalities may incur net debt equal to 2% of Estimated Market Value. The
City's gross bonding capacity is computed as follows:
Estimated Market Value $335,789,300
X 2% X 0.02
Total Gross Bonding Capacity $ 6,715,786
Less: Outstanding Debt Subject to the Limit 0
Debt Margin $ 6,715,786
The City of St. Anthony's current debt outstanding is listed in Appendix A. None of the current
debt outstanding falls under the statutory bonding limit.
The District
As stated above, school districts may incur net debt equal to 10% of their Indicated Market
Value. The Indicated Market Value is determined by dividing the County Assessor's Estimated
Market Value by the Sales Ratio determined for the District each year by the State Department
of Revenue. The following is the District's gross bonding capacity computation:
Assessors Estimated Market Value $426,240,500
Divided by the Sales Ratio 92.7%
Indicated Market Value $459,806,365
X 10% X 0.10
Gross Bonded Debt Capacity $ 45,980,636
Current Debt Outstanding(a) 5.705.000
Remaining Capacity $ 40,275,635
(a) The District's current outstanding debt is listed in Appendix A.
®SPRINGSTED \stanthoTtxi Page 3-1
Section 4
TAX IMPACT OF DIFFERING ACQUISITION COSTS
Property Tax Impacts of Acquiring the Salvation Army.Property
Six different acquisition cost structures were run at $9 million, $10 million, $11 million,
$12 million, $13 million, and $14 million and are shown in Appendix B. Several factors were
involved in how the debt was structured:
1. A dated date of August 1, 1999 was used with maturities spread over 20 years from the
year 2001 through the year 2020.
2. Changes in interest rates, timing, or size of the bond issue may cause significant
alterations of this information.
3. The underwriters discount and other costs of issuance were not added to the issue size
in structuring in order to keep the analysis simple. Were the Community to issue debt,
these costs would add to the issue size.
4. As the City does not have sufficient debt capacity, the issue was structured around the
District's outstanding debt.
5. The structures were sized to obtain level net debt service.,
6. The District does not qualify for State Equalization Aid.
The impacts of each of the six scenarios are shown in Table A. Table A assumes that a
referendum would be required. The reason this is important is that the tax impacts are
calculated on slightly different numbers depending upon whether a referendum is required.
Debt issued by the District to acquire property would require a voter referendum. A referendum
is required for cities and school districts under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475.58, except
under certain circumstances. The exceptions are:
bonds to pay a judgment;
refunding bonds;
improvement bonds or tax increment bonds where special assessments or tax
increments pay at least 20% of the cost of the project financed;
revenue bonds;
bonds issued under a charter provision or statute that permits the issuance without an
election.
The effect of those exceptions is that, in almost all cases, only general obligation bonds payable
solely from ad valorem property taxes need be approved by the voters.
Based on the current information, neither the City nor the District meets any of the exception
criteria. Therefore, a referendum would be required.
In Table A, the property tax impacts are based on referendum market value. For a property
owner with a referendum market value of $150,000, taxes would increase $272 per year at an
acquisition price of$9 million. The increase for an acquisition cost of$14 million would be $413
per year. For a property owner with a referendum market value of $300,000, taxes would
increase $545 per year at an acquisition price of$9 million. The increase for an acquisition cost
of$14 million would be $826 per year.
0 SPRINGSTED \stantho7.tx1 Page 4-1
.ti
7d
Z ISD 282 and the City of St.Anthony, Minnesota
G1 Estimated Tax Impact on the Salvation Army Property
Based on Referendum Value
d
C7
O
n
Tax impact Information 14 Million 13 Million 12 Million 11 Million 10 Million 9 million O
Bond Issue Size(20 years) $14,000,000 $13,000,000 $12,000,000 $11,000.0DO $10,000,000 $9,000,000
Average Levy 1999-2018 1,174,014 1,093,812 1,014,048 933,702 853,790 773,999
ISD 282 Referendum value for both 4
Ramsey and Hennepin County 1998/99 $426,161,300 $426,161,300 $426,161,300 $426,161,300 $426,161,300 $426,161,300
Tax Rate 0.275% 0.257% 0.238% 0.219% 0.200% 0.182% n
Tax Tax Tax Tax Tax Tex _
Estimated Rate Dollars Rate Dollars Rate Dollars Rate Dollars Rate Dollars Rate Dollars
Market Applied of Tax Applied of Tax Applied of Tax Applied of Tax Applied of Tax Applied of Tax
Value 0.275% Increase 0.257% Increase 0.238% Increase 0.219% Increase 0.200% Increase 0.182% Increase
cD
$50,000 0.275% $138 0.257% $128 0.238% $119 0.219% S110 0.200% $100 0.182% $91-
75,000 0.275% 207 0.257% 192 0.238%. $178 0.219% 164 0.200% 150 0.182% 136
100,000 0.275% 275 0.257% 257 0238% $238 0.219% 219 0.200% 200 0.182% 182 1
125,000 0.275% 344 0.257% 321 0.238% $297 0.219% 274 0.200% 250 0.182% 227 O
150,000 0.275% 413 0.257% 385 0.238% $357 0.219% 329 0.200% 301 0.182% 272
175,000 0.275% 482 0.257% 449 0.238% $416 0.219% 383 0.200% 351 0.182% 318 :3
200,000 0.275% 551 0.257% 513 0.238% $476 0.219% 438 0.200% 401 0.182% 363
225,000 0.275% 620 0257% 577 0.238% $535 0.219% 493 0.200% 451 0.182% 409 0
250,000 0.275% 689 0.257% 642 0.238% $595 0.219% 548 0.200% 501 0.182% 454 O
300,000 0.275% 826 0257% 770 0.238% $714 0.219% 657 0.200% 601 0.182% 545 O
400,000 0.275% 1,102 0.257% 1,027 0.238% $952 0219% 876 0.200% 801 0.182% 726 v
:3 500,000 0.275% 1377 0.257% 1,283 0.238% $1190 0.219% 1,095 0.200% 1002 0.182% 908
Err°v n
� •Changes In Interest rates,timing or size of the bond Issue may cause significant alterations of `«
this InAwnation.
N
� O
(D
((°D m CO
D v
N
Prepared by 8pringsted Incorporated_623/99
Section 5
SUMMARY
Summary of Factors for Decision-Making
The Community has the bonding capacity to issue the debt for acquiring the property.
There are several factors which will help determine the Community's course of action for
financing the property acquisition:
1. The City does not have the capacity to issue the total acquisition cost at any of the levels.
2. The District does have the capacity to issue the debt and still have room to issue more debt in
the future, if the need arises.
3. Based on the current information, neither the City nor the District meets any of the exception
criteria. Therefore, a referendum would be required.
4. If the District issues the debt, it could apply for the Minnesota Credit Enhancement Program.
The Minnesota Credit Enhancement Program created by Minnesota Statute 126C.55 allows
school districts to obtain a better credit rating on bonds issued. The better interest rate means
the Community, as a whole, would realize a better interest rate on the bonds.
5. The Salvation Army property is currently exempt from the tax base. The final disposition of the
property and its tax status could have an effect on the full impact to the Community.
2 SPRINGSTED \stanthoTtxi Page 5-1
Appendix I
Existing Debt
THE DISTRICT
Current Debt Levels and Debt Capacities
Debt Outstanding
8/1/95 $1,560,000 School Building 2/1/2005 $1,130,000
8/1/95 4,650,000 School Building 2/1/2016 4,305,000
5/1/99 270,000 Capital Equipment Notes 2/1/2004 270.000
Total $5,705,000
THE CITY
General Obligation Debt Supported Primarily By Special Assessments
Principal
Date Original Final Outstanding
of Issue Amount Purpose Maturity As of 1-2-99
8-1-93 $470,000 Improvements 2-1-2009 $ 360,000
6-1-94 525,000 Improvements 2-1-2010 460,000
3-1-95 825,000 Improvements 2-1-2011 785,000
4-1-97 690,000 Improvements 2-1-2013 690,000
4-1-98 725,000 Improvements 2-1-2014 725,000
4-1-99 425,000 Improvements (this Issue) 2-1-2015 425.000
Total $3,445,000
General Obligation Debt Supported by Tax Increments
Principal
Date Original Final Outstanding
of Issue Amount Purpose Maturity As of 1-2-99
1-1-94 $ 215,000 Tax Increment Refunding 2-1-2001 $ 100,000
12-1-95 2,650,000 Tax Increment 2-1-2010 2;245,000
7-1-96 1,720,000 Taxable Tax Increment 2-1-2013 1.720.000
Total $4,065,000
Revenue Debt
Principal
Date Original Final Outstanding
of Issue Amount Purpose Maturity As of 1-2-99
8-1-97 $940,000 Liquor Revenue 1-1-2012 $895,000
Other Debt
The City entered into two equipment note agreements for equipment used in its liquor
operations. One of the agreements has an outstanding balance of $4,736 at
December 31, 1998 and requires monthly payments of $273, including interest; this agreement
matures August 1, 2000. The other agreement has an outstanding balance of $6,909 at
December 31, 1998. This agreement requires monthly payments of $185 and matures
December 1, 2002. Both agreements are secured by the equipment. Scheduled note
maturities for subsequent years are: 1999 - $4,044; 2000 - $3,546; 2002 - $1,701; and 2002 -
$2,602.
Appendix II
Debt Structures for Each
of the 6 Acquisition Costs.
ISD No.282,St.Anthony-New Brighton,Minnesota
General Obligation School Bonds,Series 1999A
$9,000,000 Scenario 1
Dated Date 811/99 #months to 1 st interest: 6
First Interest 2/1100 #months covered by 1st levy: 18
Mature 2/1
Total
Levy Maturity Existing 105% Required
Year Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service of Total Tax Levy
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (8)
1999 2/1/01 85,000 3.450% 646,376 731,376 617,655 1,416,483 1,416,483
2000 2/1/02 90,000 3.700% 427,985 517,985 616,905 1,191,635 1,191,635
2001 2/1103 95,000 3.750% 424,655 519,655 615115 1,191,509 1,191,509
2002 2/1/04 100,000 3.950% 421,093 521,093 617,160 1,195,165 1,195,165
2003 211/05 100,000 4.100% 417,143 517,143 617,760 1,191,648 1,191,648
2004 211/06 325,000 4.200% 413,043 738,043 396,970 1,191,763 1,191,763
2005 211107 340,000 4.300% 399,393 739,393 395,860 1,192,015 1,192,015
2006 2/1/08 350,000 4.400% 384,773 734,773 399,015 1,190,477 1,190,477
2007 2/1109 370,000 4.500% 369,373 739,373 396,030 1,192,173 1,192,173
2008 2/1/10 385,000 4.600% 352,723 737,723 397,260 1,191,732 1,191,732
2009 2/1/11 405,000 4.700% 335,013 740,013 397,410 1,194,294 1,194,294
2010 2/1/12 425,000 4.700% 315,978 740,978 396,450 1,194,299 1,194,299
2011 2/1/13 445,000 4.850% 296,003 741,003 394,350 1,192,120 1,192,120
2012 2/1/14 465,000 4.850% 274,420 739,420 396,238 1,192,440 1,192,440
2013 2/1/15. 485,000 4.850% 251,868 736,868 396,975 1,190,535 1,190,535
2014 2/1116 510,000 4.950% 228,345 738,345 396,563 1,191,653 1,191,653
2015 2/1/17 935,000 4.950% 203,100 1,138,100 - 1,195,005 1,195,005
2016 211/18 980,000 5.075% 156,818 1,136,818 - 1,193,658 1;193,658
2017 2/1/19 1,030,000 5:075% 107,083 1,137,083 - 1,193,937 1,193,937
2018 211/20 1.080.000 5.075% 54,810 1,134,810 - 1,191,551 1,191,551
9,000,000 6,479,989 15,479,989 7,447,715 24,074,089 24,074,089
Bond Years 132,250 Annual Interest 6,479,989 Project costs 8,814,000
Average Maturity 14.69 Discount 135,000 Allowance for Discount 135,000
Average Coupon 4.900% Net Interest Cost 6,614,989 Costs of Issuance 51,000
TNTC 6,925,049 N.I.C.Rate 5.002% Rounding -
Serles 1999 only avg.
levy(1999-2018) $ 773,999.44
Av .Le 1999-2018 $1,203,704.45 Bond Issue Size 9,000,000
Sdscenl
ISO No.282,St.Anthony-New Brighton,Minnesota
General Obligation School Bonds,Series 1999A
$10,000,000 Scenario 2
Dated Date 8/1199 #months to 1 st interest: 6
First Interest 2/1/00 #months covered by 1st levy: 18
Mature 2/1
Total
Levy Maturity Existing 105% Required
Year Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service of Total Tax Levy
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1999 211)01 120,000 3.450% 715,523 835,523 617,655 1,525,836 1,525,836
2000 2/1)02 125,000 3.700% 472,875 597,875 616,905 1,275,519 1,275,519
2001 2/1)03 130,000 3.750% 468,250 598,250 615,115 1,274,033 1,274,033
2002 2/1/04 135,000 3.950% 463,375 598,375 617,160 1,276,312 1,276,312
2003 2/1105 140,000 4.100% 458,043 598,043 617,760 1,276,593 1,276,593
2004 2/1/06 365,000 4.200% 452,303 817,303 396,970 1,274,986 1,274,986
2005 211)07 380,000 4.300% 436,973 816,973 395,860 1,273,474 1,273,474
2006 211/08 395,000 4.400% 420,633 815,633 399,015 1,275,380 1,275,380
2007 2/1/09 415,000 4.500% 403,253 818,253 396,030 1,274,997 1,274,997
2008 211/10 435,000 4.600% 384,578 819,578 397,260 1,277,679 1,277,679
2009 211/11 450,000 4.700% 364,568 814,568 397,410 1,272,576 1,272,576
2010 211/12• 475,000 4.700% 343,418 818,418 396,450 1,275,611 1,275,611
2011 2/1/13 500,000 4.850% 321,093 821,093 394,350 1,276,215 1,276,215
2012 211/14 520,000 4.850% 296,843 816,843 396,238 1,273,734 1,273,734
2013 211/15 545,000 4.850% 271,623 816,623 396,975 1,274,277 1,274,277
2014 211116 575,000 4.950% 245,190 820,190 396,563 1,277,590 1,277,590
2015 2/1/17 995,000 4.950% 216,728 1,211,728 - 1,272,314 1,272,314
2016 2/1/18 1,045,000 5.075% 167,475 1,212,475 - 1,273,099 1,273,099
2017 2/1/19 1,100,000 5.075% 114,441 1,214,441 - 1,275,163 1,275,163
2018 2/120 1.155.000 5.075% 58,616 1,213,616 - 1,274,297 1,274,297
10,000,000 7,075,795 17,075,795 7,447,715 25,749,686 25,749,686
Bond Years 144,625 Annual Interest 7,075,795 Project costs 9,798,000
Average Maturity 14.46 Discount 150,000 Allowance for Discount 150,000
Average Coupon 4.893% Net Interest Cost 7,225;795 Costs of Issuance 54,000
TNTC 6,925,049 N.I.C.Rate 4.996% Rounding
Series 1999 only avg.
levy(1999-2018) $ 853,789.75
.Avg.Le 1999-2018 E1 287 484.28 Bond Issue Size 10,000,000
Sdscenl
ISD No.282,St Anthony-New Brighton,Minnesota
General Obligation School Bonds,Series 1999A
$11,000,000 Scenario 3
Dated Date 8/1/99 #months to 1 st interest: 6
First Interest 211/00 #months covered by 1 st levy: 18
Mature 2/1
Total
Levy Maturity Existing 105% Required
Year Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service of Total Tax Levy
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1999 2/1/01 155,000 3.450% 784,708 939,708 617,655 1,635,231 1,635,231
2000 211/02 160,000 3.700% 517,791 677,791 616,905 1,359,431 1,359,431
2001 2/1/03 165,000 3.750% 511,871 676,871 615,115 1,356,586 1,356,586
2002 2/1/04 170,000 3.950% 505,684 675,684 617,160 1,357,486 1,357,486
2003 2/1/05 175,000 4.100% 498,969 673,969 617,760 1,356,315 1,356,315
2004 2/1/06 405,000 4.200% 491,794 896,794 396,970 1,358,452 1,358,452
2005 2/1/07 425,000 4.300% 474,784 899,784 395,860 1,360,426 1,360,426
2006 2/1/08 440,000 4.400% 456,509 896,509 399,015 1,360,300 1,360,300
2007 2/1/09 460,000 4.500% 437,149 897,149 396,030 1,357,838 1,357,838
2008 211110 480,000 4.600% 416,449 896,449 397,260 1,358,394 1,358,394
2009 2/1/11 500,000 4.700% 394,369 894,369 397,410 1,356,368 11356:368
2010 2/1/12 525,000 4.700% 370,869 895,869 396,450 1,356,935 1,356,935
2011 211/13 550,000 -4.850% 346,194 896,194 394,350 1,355,071 1,355,071
2012 2/1/14 575,000 4.850% 319,519 894,519 396,238 1,355,294 1,355,294
2013 2/1/15 605,000 4.850% 291,631 896,631 396,975 1,358,287 1,358,287
2014 2/1/16 635,000 4.950% 262,289 897,289 396,563 1,358,544 1,358,544
2015 2/1/17 1,060,000 4.950% 230,856 1,290,856 - 1,355,399 1,355,399
2016 2/1/18 1,115,000 5.075% 178,386 1,293,386 1,358,056 1,358,056
2017 2/1/19 1,170,000 5.075% 121,800 1,291,800. - 1,356,390 1,356,390
2018 2/1/20 1,230.000 5.075% 62,423 1,292,423 - 1,357,044 1,357,044
11,000,000 7,674,042 18,674,042 7,447,715 27,427,845 27,427,845
Bond Years- 157,045 Annual Interest 7,674,042 Project costs 10,777,400
Average Maturity 14.28 Discount 165,000 Allowance for Discount 165,000
Average Coupon 4.887% Net Interest Cost 7,839,042 Costs of Issuance 57,600
TNTC 6,925,049 N.I.C. Rate 4.992% Rounding -
Series 1999 only avg.
levy(1999-2018) $ 933,702.09
Avg.Le 1999-2018 $1,371,392.24 1 Bond Issue Size 11,000,000
Sdscenl
ISD No.282,St.Anthony-New Brighton, Minnesota
General Obligation School Bonds,Series 1999A
$12,000,000 Scenario 4
Dated Date 8/1/99 #months to 1st interest 6
First Interest 2/1/00 #months covered by 1st levy: 18
Mature 2/1
Total
Levy Maturity Existing 105%. Required
Year Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service of Total Tax Levy
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1999 211/01 185,000 3.450% 854,121 1,039,121 617,655 1,739,614 1,739,614
2000 211/02 190,000 3.700% 563,031 753,031 616,905 1,438,433 1,438,433
2001 211/03 200,000 3.750% 556,001 756,001 615,115 1,439,672 1,439,672
2002 2/1/04 205,000 3.950% 548,501 753,501 617,160 1,439,194 1,439,194
2003 211/05 . 215,000 4.100% 540,404 755,404 617,760 1,441,822 1,441,822
2004 2/1/06 445,000 4.200% 531,589 976,589 396,970 1,442,237 1,442,237
2005 2/1/07 465,000 4.300% 512,899 977,899 395,860 1,442,447 1,442,447
2006 2/1/08 480,000 4.400% 492,904 972,904 399,015 1,440,515 1,440,515
2007 211/09 505,000 4.500% 471,784 976,784 396,030 1,441,454 1,441,454
2008 211/10 525,000 4.600% 449,059 974,059 397,260 1,439,885 1,439,885
2009 211/11 550,000 4.700% 424,909 974,909 397,410 1,440,935 . 1,440,935
2010 2/1/12 575,000 4.700% 399,059 974,059 396,450 1,439,034 1,439,034
2011 211/13 605,000 4.850% 372,034 977,034 394,350 1,439,953 1,439,953
2012 211/14 635,000 4.850% 342,691 977,691 396,238 1,442,625 1,442,625
2013 211115 665,000 4.850% 311,894 976,894 396,975 1,442,562 1,442,562
2014 211/16 695,000 4.950% 279,641 974,641 396,563 .1,439,764 1,439,764
2015 2/1/17 1,125,000 4.950% 245,239 1,370,239 - 1,438,751 1,438,751
2016 2/1/18- 1,185,000 , 5.075% 189,551 1,374,551 - 1,443,279 1,443,279
2017 2/1/19 1,245,000 5.075% 129,413 1,374,413 - 1,443,133 1,443,133
2018 211/20 1.305.000 5.075% 66,229 1,371,229 - 1,439,790 - 1,439,790
12,000,000 8,280,951 20,280,951 7,447,715 29,115,099 29,115,099
Bond Years 169,630 Annual Interest 8,280,951 Project costs 11,759,900
Average Maturity 14.14 Discount 180,000 Allowance for Discount 180,000
Average Coupon 4.882% Net Interest Cost 8,460,951 Costs of Issuance 60,100
TNTC 6,925,049 N.I.C.Rate 4.988%" Rounding -
Series 1999 only avg.
levy(1999-2018) $1,014,047.53
Avg.Le 1999-2018 $1,455,754.95 Bond Issue Size 12,000,000
Sdscenl
ISD No.282,St Anthony-New Brighton,Minnesota
General Obligation School Bonds,Series 1999A
$13,000,000 Scenario 5
Dated Date 8/1/99 #months to 1 st interest 6.
First Interest 211/00 #months covered by 1 st levy: 18
Mature 2/1
Total
Levy Maturity Existing 105% Required
Year Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service of Total Tax Levy
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1999 2/1/01 220,000 3.450% 923,252 1,143,252 617,655 1,848,952 1,848,952
2000 2/1/02 225,000 3.700% 607,911 832,911 616,905 1,522,307 1,522,307
2001 2/1/03 235,000 3.750% 599,586 834,586 615,115 1,522,186 1,522,186
2002 2/1/04 245,000 3.950% 590,774 835,774 617,160 1,525,580 1,525,580
2003 2/1/05 250,000 4.100% 581,096 831,096 617,760 1,521,299 1,521,299
2004 - 2/1/06 485,000 4.200% 570,846 1,055,846 396,970 1,525,457 1,525,457
2005 2/1/07 505,000 4.300% 550,476 1,055,476 395,860 1,523,903 1,523,903
2006 211/08 525,000 4.400% 528,761 1,053,761 399,015 1,525,415 1,525,415
2007 211/09 550,000 4.500% 505,661 1,055,661 396,030 1,524,276- 1,524,276
2008 2/1/10 570,000 4.600% 480,911 1,050,911 397,260 1,520,580 1,520,580
2009 211/11 600,000 4.700% 454,691. 1,054,691 397,410 1,524,706 1,524,706
2010 211/12 630,000 4.700% 426,491 1,056,491 396,450 1,525,588 1,525,588
2011 2/1/13 660,000 4.850% 396,881 1,056,881 394,350 1,523,793 1,523,793
2012 211/14 690,000 4.850% 364,871 1,054,871 396,238 1,523,664 1,523,664
2013 211/15 720,000 4.850% 331,406 1,051,406 396,975 1,520,800 1,520,800
2014 2/1/16 755,000 4.950% 296,486 1,051,486 396,563 1,520,451 1,520,451
2015 2/1/17 1,190,000 4.950% 259,114 1,449,114 - 1,521,569 1,521,569
2016 2/1/18 1,250,000 5.075% 200,209 1,450,209 - 1,522,719 1,522,719
2017 2/1h9 1,315,000 5.075% 136,771 1,451,771 - 1,524,360 1,524,360
2018 2/1/20 1,380,000 5.075% 70,035 1,450,035 - 1,522,537 1,522,537
13,000,000 8,876,232 21,876,232 7,447,715 30,790,144 30,790,144
Bond Years 181,995 Annual Interest 8,876,232 Project costs 12,741,300
Average Maturity 14.00 Discount 195,000 Allowance for Discount 195,000
Average Coupon 4.877% Net Interest Cost 9,071,232 Costs of Issuance 63,700
TNTC 6,925,049 N.I.C.Rate 4.984% Rounding -
Series 1999 only avg.
levy(1999-2018) $1,093,811.59
Av .Le 1999-2018 $1,539,507.21 1 Bond Issue Size 13,000,000
Sdscenl
ISD No.282,St Anthony-New Brighton,Minnesota
General Obligation School Bonds,Series 1999A
$14,000,000 Scenario 6
Dated Date 8/1/99 *months to 1 st interest: 6
First Interest 211/00 N months by 1 st levy: 18
Mature 2/1
Total
Levy Maturity Existing 105% Required
Year Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service of Total Tax Levy
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1999 2/1/01 250,000 3.450% 992,599 1,242,599 617,655 1,953,266 1,953,266
2000 2/1/02 260,000 3.700% 653,108 913,108 616,905 1,606,513 1,606,513
2001 2/1/03 270,000 . 3.750% 643,488 913,488 615,115 1,605,033 1,805,033
2002 211/04 280,000 3.950% 633,363 • 913,363 617,160 1,607,049 1,607,049
2003 2/1/05 290,000 4.100% 622,303 912,303 617,760 1,606,566 1,606,566
2004 211/06 520,000 4.200% 610,413 1,130,413 396,970 1,603,752 1,603,752
2005 2/1/07 545,000 4.300% 588,573 1,133,573 395,860 1,605,904 1,605,904
2006 2/1/08 565,000 4.400% 565,138 1,130,138 399,015 1,605,610 1,605,610
2007 2/1/09 595,000 4.500% 540,278 1,135,278 396,030 1,607,873 1,607,873
2008 211/10 620,000 4.600% 513,503. 1,133,503 397,260 1,607,301 1,607,301
2009 2/1/11 650,000 4.700% 484,983 1,134,983 397,410 1,609,012 1,609,012
2010 211/12 680,000 4.700% 454,433' 1,134,433 396,450 1,607,427 1,60,7,427
2011 2/1/13 715,000 4.850% 422,473 1,137,473 394,350 1,608,414 1,608,414
2012 211/14 745,000 4.850% 387,795' 1,132,795 396,238 1,605,484 1,605,484
2013 2/1/15 780,000 4.850% 351,663 1,131,663 396,975 1,605,069 1,605,069
2014 2/1/16 820,000 4.950% 313,833 1,133,833 396,563 1,606,915 1,606,915
2015 2/1/17 1,255,000 4.950% 273,243 1,528,243 - 1,604,655 1,604,655
2016 2/1/18 1,320,000 5.075% 211,120 1,531,120 - 1,607,676 1,607,676
2017 2/1/19 1,385,000 5.075% 144,130 1,529,130 - 1,605,587 1,605,587
2018 2/1/20 1.455.000 5.075% 73,841 1,528,841 - 1,605,283 1,605,283
14,000,000 9,480,273 23,480,273 7,447,715 32,474,387 32,474,387
Bond Years 194,525 Annual Interest 9,480,275 Project costs 13,722,700
Average Maturity 13.89 Discount 210,000 Allowance for Discount 210,000
Average Coupon 4.874% Net Interest Cost 9,690,273 Costs of Issuance 67,300
TNTC 6,925,049 N.I.C.Rate 4.982% Rounding -
Series 1999 only avg.
levy(1999-2018) $1,174,013.63
Av .Le 1999-2018 $1,623,719.34 18ond Issue Size 14,000,000
Sdscenl
Appendix III
Executive Summary
St. Anthony Community. "Brainstorming" Session
"Possibilities for Salvation Army Camp"
Executive Summary
St. Anthony Community "Brainstorming" Session
"Possibilities for Salvation Army Camp"
Monday, April 26,1999
This two and one half hour session was called to order on Monday
evening, April 26, 1999 in the conference room of the St. Anthony
Community Center. Mr. Clarence Ranallo the Mayor, welcomed 23
community representatives to participate in a structured "brainstorm" of
possible uses for the 80 acre tract of land that is currently owned and used
by the Salvation Army. He stressed the fact that although it has been
mentioned that this land may be for sale, there is little other curent
information available at this date. He emphasized the necessity of being
"poised and prepared" in the event that the land becomes available for
purchase in the near future. He reminded everyone present that the City
and the School District of St. Anthony were teaming together to offer the
vested stakeholders the opportunity to express their ideas and views as to
possible uses for this unique tract of land.
The facilitator reviewed the purpose, process, and the payoff for the
meeting. The group was divided into four tables to participate in two
rounds of brainstorming. The first round asked the participants to
brainstorm, clarify, and multivote (prioritize) the top three possible uses
for the land. The following choices were presented at the general feedback
session:
• A park
• an environmental learning center
• Athletic fields
• A highly developed park(e.g. pool, picnic, playing fields, etc.)
• Retreat.and/or conference center
• Community Center
• Community/recreational center
• Corporate campus
• Senior Housing
• Maintain current use
• Joint School District Magnet School (e.g. environmental school)
• Corporate Headquarters but with public spaces
Other uses that came from the first round of discussions included
ideas such as a golf course, a restaurant/supper club, residential homes, a
hog rendering plant in honor of the city's history, a correction center, a
new public works plant and a college campus.
There were several apparent themes that emerged from this first
discussion . All four tables agreed that these themes were important to
remember in the case that the opportunity to purchase became real. They
were described as follows:
—recreation
—multi-use
—open space
—emphasis on community
—benevolence
—"revenue" producer
—span the ages from youth to senior
—benefits accrue to broad spectrum of groups
The second round of brainstorming focused upon the creative
financing strategies that might be considered in the event that the City and
the School District were able to purchase the Salvation Army Camp. There
was a great deal of discussion both in the small groups as well as in the
general feedback session as to the necessity of developing a financing
option that would not only allow them to purchase the land, but to also
maintain it as well. One of the participants also reminded the group of the
real need to think like a community taxpayer and temper the creative ideas
with a dose of reality. There was mention of the previous call to the
community of St. Anthony to support the construction of the Community
building and what the financial impact on each taxpayer was at that point in
time. The following represents the one or two more interesting financial
ideas to emerge from each of the four groups:
• Sell other existing property (e.g. old public works)
• Public/Private purchase(model of Lifetime Fitness and the city of Plymouth was
mentioned as an example)
• Seek foundation donations, State Legislature help, etc.
• County/City/School District/Parks collaboration
• Partner with private and/or non-profit organizations
• Partner with other cities and counties
• Bond referendum
• Seek out a wealthy individual and/or apply to a foundation
• Regional Parks and/or Metropolitan Council
• Non-profit to operate the site with funding from other groups
• Holding property hostage (i.e. specify to property developer certain % of space and
usage)
• Holding company (in order to buy time)
There were several apparent issues that sparked conversation both in
and out of the small groups that resulted from the discussions of purchase.
They are as follows:
—Timing and Process
—Scope and Environmental Impact study
—"TIF"Is it viable?
—Cost to individual household
—loss of control over land and usage
—What's the cost of not doing anything?
At the end of the meeting Dr. William Carr asked to address the
group. As a resident as well as member of the camp board, he spoke of the
uniqueness of the land, the camp and its history, and his personal
observations about the Salvation Army property board. It was agreed by all
that this opportunity is still somewhat uncertain and that more
communication is needed between the Salvation Army and possible
purchasers such as the City of St. Anthony and the School District. The
Mayor concluded the meeting by thanking the participants for their time
and their ideas, and promised to keep everyone informed as new
information is gained. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 PM.
Appendix IV
Glossary
Glossary of Terminology
Ad Valorem Tax- A tax based on the value (or assessed value) of property [Latin: to the value
added].
Bond Year-An element in calculating average life of an issue and in calculating net interest
cost and net interest rate on an issue. A bond year is the number of 12-month intervals
between the date of the bond and its maturity date, measured in $1,000 increments. For
example, the "bond years" allocable to a $5,000 bond dated April 1, 1980, and maturing June 1,
1981, is 5.830 [1.166 (14 months divided by 12 months) x 5 (number of$1,000 increments in
$5,000 bond)]. Usual computations include "bond years" per maturity or per an interest rate,
and total "bond years" for the issue.
Call-Actions taken to pay the principal amount of the bonds prior to the stated maturity date, in
accordance with the provisions for"call" stated in the proceedings and the bonds.
Callable - Subject to payment of the principal amount (and accrued interest) prior to the stated
maturity date, with or without payment of a call premium.
Costs of Issuance-The expenses associated with the sale of a new issue of municipal
securities, including such items as printing, legal, and rating agency fees, and others. In certain
cases, the underwriter's spread may be considered one of the costs of issuance.
Dated Date (or Issue Date) - The date of a bond issue from which the bondholder is entitled to
receive interest, even though the bonds may actually be delivered at some other date.
Debt Limit- Statutory or constitutional limit on the principal amount of debt that an issuer may
incur(or that it may have outstanding at any one time).
Debt Service - Principal and interest.
Discount- (1) Amount (stated in dollars or a percent) by which the selling or purchase price of a
security is less than its face amount. (2) Amount by which the amount bid for an issue is less
than the aggregate principal amount of that issue.
Estimated Market Value- The estimated selling price of a property, as determined by the
County Assessor, in an arm's-length transaction between reasonable people. Market values
are determined as of January 2nd of the assessment year and are used for determining taxes for
the subsequent (tax payable) year.
Issue Date (or Dated Date) -The date of a bond issue from which the bondholder is entitled to
receive interest, even though the bonds may actually be delivered at some other date.
Level Debt Service-The result of a maturity schedule that has increasing principal amounts
maturing each year so that the debt service in all years is essentially "level." "Level debt
service" is often used with revenue bond issues (and, in a familiar area, in the traditional
approach to monthly payments on home mortgages).
Maturity Date -The stated date on which all or a portion of the principal amount of a security is
due and payable.
Maturity Schedule - The schedule (by dates and amounts) of principal maturities of an issue.
Minnesota Credit Enhancement Program - The Minnesota School District Credit Enhancement
Program (the "Program") created by Minnesota Statutes, Section 126C.55 (the "Act"). Under
the Act, if the District believes it may be unable to make a principal or interest payment on the
due date, it must notify the Commissioner of Children, Families and Learning as soon as
possible, but not less than 15 working days prior to the due date, which notice is to specify
certain information. After consultation with the District and paying agent, and after verification
of the accuracy of the information provided, the Commissioner of Children, Families and
Learning must notify the Commissioner of Finance. The Act provides that "upon receipt of this
notice...the Commissioner of Finance shall issue a warrant and authorize the Commissioner of
Children, Families and Learning to pay to the paying agent for this debt obligation the specific
amount on or before the date due. The amounts needed for this purpose are annually
appropriated to the Department of Children, Families and Learning from the State General
Fund."
The Act was not apparently intended to create indebtedness of the State of Minnesota.
Payment by the State will be dependent upon the availability of sufficient appropriations for the
purpose of the Program.
Net Direct Debt- Total direct debt of a municipality less all self-supporting debt, any sinking
funds and short-term debt such as tax anticipation notes and revenue anticipation notes.
Net Interest Cost- The traditional method of calculating bids for new issues of municipal
securities. The total dollar amount of interest over the life of the bonds is adjusted by the
amount of premium or discount bid, and then reduced to an average annual rate. The other
method is known as the true interest cost (see "True Interest Cost").
Net Tax Capacity for the Local Rate -The Net Tax Capacity for the Local Rate is determined by
taking the aggregate Net Tax Capacity for a governmental unit and reducing that total by the
captured value in tax increment districts and the value of the contribution to the fiscal disparity
pool. The value pledged to these two programs is not available for local taxing purposes.
Overlapping Debt- On a municipal issuer's financial statement"overlapping debt" is the debt of
other issuers which is payable in whole or in part by taxpayers of the subject issuer. As an
example, a county usually includes several smaller government units and its debt is
apportioned to them for payment based on the ratio of the assessed value of each smaller unit
to the assessed value of the county. Another example is when a school district includes two or
more municipalities within its bounds.
Referendum Market Value - Market values are determined as of January 2nd of the assessment
year and are used for determining taxes for the subsequent (tax payable) year.
Taxable Market Value - The estimated market value as adjusted for various statutory
exemptions, exceptions, and deferrals. The most common adjustments for homes are the
Limited Market Value and "This Old House"deferrals. The Limited Market Value allows the
market value of a home to only increase by the greater of 10% or '/4 the difference in values
from the prior year, exclusive of new improvements. "This Old House" defers, upon request,
the qualifying value of improvements made to homes that are at least 35 years old. Market
values are determined as of January 2nd of the assessment year and are used for determining
taxes for the subsequent (tax payable) year.
Taxable Net Tax Capacity(TNTC) - The Minnesota Legislature has determined that different
uses of property should be taxed at different rates. This tax differential is accomplished through
the use of class rates; e.g., homesteads at 1.00% of the 11' $75,000 of Taxable Market Value
and 1.70% over$75,000; large apartments at 2.50%; commercial property at 2.45% of the 151
$100,000 and 3.5% over$100,000.
The class rates are multiplied by the Taxable Market Value of a property to determine its Net
Tax Capacity (or tax base). On an individual property, the Net Tax Capacity is multiplied by the
local tax rate to determine the property tax.
The sum of all the Net Tax Capacities of property in the governmental unit is the Net Tax
Capacity (or tax base) of that government.
True Interest Cost-A method of calculating bids for new issues of municipal securities that
takes into consideration the time value of money (see "Net Interest Cost").
Trustee - A bank designated by the issuer.as the custodian of funds and official representative
of bondholders. "Trustees" are appointed to insure compliance with the contract and represent
bondholders to enforce their contract with the issuers.
Underwriting Spread-The difference between the offering.price to the public by the underwriter
and the purchase price the underwriter pays to the issuer. The underwriter's profit, expenses
and selling costs are usually paid from this amount.
Glossary Sources: Public Securities Association, Fundamentals of Municipal Bonds. Third Edition.
Ramsey County, Minnesota, Department of Property Records and Revenue.
ABITHE APPRAISAL B UREA U
Consulting Valuation Engineers
5955 Golden Valley Road, Suite 201 -Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
(612) 595-7126/Fax (612) 595-7127
August 24, 1999
Mr.Michael J.Mornson, City Manager
Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony,MN 55418-1699
REFERENCE: PRIMARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS TO ESTIMATE VALUE RANGE FOR
THE SLIVER LAKE SALIVATION ARMY CAMP(101 ACRES)LOCATED AT THE
SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SLIVER LAKE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD E.
Dear Mr.Morrison:
Based on your request we have pursued the research necessary to give an opinion of value range under the
various potential highest best use. The various uses that I have considered possible are:
I. Residential-
Mixture of detached residential homesites—some with lakeshore,and a limited amount of
town houses.
II. Corporate Headquarters-
There are many corporations today who want a relaxed atmosphere for the corporate
headquarters.
III. City or County Park-
The search that was done for government purchased parks was inconclusive. Data was not
found within the time frame of this research assignment. I am.sure there is sale data. There
have been parks purchased and formed within the last fifteen years,but I could not get the
sale information.
Therefore,as of this point,I could not come to any conclusion as to what the value sales of other parks
would indicate for the subject.
If the results of this particular,park type,research are important and you feel that additional research would
be wanted, we could continue this part of the project. Additional time would be required.
The research and the analysis of our research is summarized below:
I. Residential Development
Value Range of the subject site,if developed as a residential subdivision. After considerable
research I have found a sale of 51 acres in Golden Valley which also has good attractive
lakeshores,very similar to the subject in its physical and location amenities.
The subject,based on my drawing,could be developed with about 25-26 lakeshore lots, 14
detached single family lots and have about 13 acres left for townhouse development
Page 82
Mr.Michael J.Mornson
Page 2
August 24, 1999
The information received about the Golden Valley, Sweeney Lake, location is
as follows:
Site Size-51 Acres
Sale Date: June 1997
Sale Price: $1,300,000
Plus:
Demolition of building $2,000,000
Asbestosis Removal $4,000,000
Total $7,300,000 (base cost for land acquisition)
$7,300,000/51 acres $ 143,137
Sale Price Per Acre $ 143,137
Say,
$ 145,000
The adjustments to this sale price are as following:
Sale Price per Acre $ 145,000
Time—mid 1997(+16 0/.) $ 23,200
Current Cash Sale Price $ 168,200
Site Size(-15%) ($ 25,200)
Topography Modification $ 0
Location $ 0
Risk Factor ($ 8,400)
Indication of Value/Acre $ 134,600
101 acres @$134,600 = $13,600,000
The second raw land sale took place in 1995. It had no lakeshore but it was located in a very
prestigious area of Edina. It was developed into eleven(11)lots and they sold in the
$400,000 to$485,000 range. They sold within one year. Note all of the lots sold above
$400,000 indicating that a location adjustment is necessary.
The adjustments for this site are noted below:
Location: 5000 Blake Road
Sale Price: $2,700,000
Sale Date: 10/1995
Site Size: 10.79 acres
Sale Price.Per Acre: $250,200
Adjustment
Time(+30%): $ 75,000
Time Adjust Sale Price: $325,200
Risk factor(-15%): ($ 48,800)
Subject Size(-25 1/o): ($ 81,300)
Location: ($ 12,500)
Topography Modification ($ 65,300)
Indicated Price Per Acre $ 117,300
Page 83
Mr. Michael J. Morrison
Page 3
August 24, 1999
This sale indicates the following value for the subject site:
101 acres @$117,300 $11,850,000
Il. Corporate or-Multi-Tenant Office Location
There have been a couple of sales in the Southdale/I-494/France Avenue area where the sites
were used for office,multi-tenant,buildings. These sites and the structures that were built on
them could have just as easily been corporate locations. Sale information was not available.
Golden Vallev Site
The Golden Valley site was sold in September 1997. It consisted of 4.82 acres and sold for
$1,514,395,or$7.21 per square foot. The site has frontage and exposure on Highway 55
(Olson Memorial Highway),but access from Golden Valley Road.
The proposed construction is two(2)multi-tenant structures with occupancy in the medical
related field. The improvements are multi-story buildings,which did not require ramp type
parking due to their lot size.
The subject site,if used for a corporate structure,would not be turned into a parking lot. In
order to retain the site amenities I am sure the city could require ramp parking in order to
maintain as much green area as possible.
This sale indicates the following value ranges:
Location: 8301 Golden Valley Road
Sale Date: September 1997
Sale Price: $1,514,395
Site Size: 310,000 square feet
Sale Price Per Acre: $7.21 per square foot
Indicated Price Per Acre: $ 314,100
Adjustments:
Time @ 10% $ 31,400
Current Sales Price Per Acre: $ 345,500
Adjustments:
Location $ 0 .
Site Size(-25%) ($ 86,370)
City Utilities @$0.50 1 sq.ft. ($ 21,800)
Topography Modification-
@$1.50 per sq.ft. ($ 65,300)
Parking Ramp—
83 stalls @$12,000/101 ($ 9,900)
Value Indication Per Acre $ 162,200
Value for 101 Acres $ 16,380,000
Page 84
Mr.Michael J.Mornson
Page 4
August 24, 1999
Fridlev Sale
Ms. Barb Dacy of the Fridley Development Office indicated that Medtronic also paid$6.00 to
$8.00 per square foot for their new site at Central and the I-694 intersection. This was net
dollars to Medtronic. For this they purchased about 10 acres,in a ready-to-build condition.
No soil contamination problems.
This indicated value range is for one of the best commercial/office sites in the northeast
suburban area. In my opinion,I feel the market would look with equality on the Medtronic
site vs. the Silver Lake site. If,.however,visibility was important the I-694 site is better. The
Sliver Lake site offers"an environment". This peace and tranquillity less the stressful
environment for office space is becoming more and more of an influence in the market place.
This type of environment was started locally in Roundhorse's Opus development in the
southeast corner of Minnetonka(northwest quadrant of the 169/62 Crosstown intersection).
This corporate atmosphere has also been used in other areas in the Twin Cities and has
worked with single and multi-tenant office buildings.
In my opinion,there would be no location adjustment for this Fridley site. The other
adjustments are noted below:
Site Size—Ten(10)acres.
@$6.00 per sq.ft.,or$260,000 per acre
@$8.00 per sq.ft.,or$348,500 per acre
Indication of Value Ranges
Per Acre @$ 260,000 @$ 348,500
Adjustment:
Time $ 25,300 $ 35,200
Current Sales Price Per Acre $ 285,300 $ 383,700
Less Location $ 0 $ 0
Less Site Size(-25%) ($ 71,300) ($ .95,900)
Less City Utilities—
@$0.50 per sq.ft. ($ 21,800) ($ 21,800)
Topography Modification
@$1.50 per sq.ft ($ 65,300) ($ 65,300)
Parking Ramp $ 0 $ 0
Value Indication Per Acre $ 126,900 $ 200,700
Value for 101 Acres $ 12,800,000® $ 20,300,000
Page 85
Mr:Michael J.Momson
Page 5
August 24, 1999
Ms.Dacy also indicated that if the site were purchased as raw land(without the development
cost,the Medtronic site was about$100,000 per acre.
This value attributable to the subject indicates the following value:
101 acre @$100,000 per acre = $ 10,000,000
In summary the above noted research and and corresponding questionable analysis indicated the following
possible value ranges.
I. Value range as residentially developed
$13,600,000—Sweney Lake/Golden Valley
$11,850,000—Blake Road/Edina
II. Corportable Headquarters
$16,380,000—Golden Valley Sale
$12,800,000-$20,300,000—Medtronic Sale
$10,000,000—Medtronic Raw Land Sale
III. City or County Park
No significant data found.
* Best and most reasonable comparable
esp y su tted,
THE APP L BUREAU
E.Taylo M L SRA
Sem er
MN License No.4000015
/pb
Page 86
NORTH WEST ( ) SECTION 31
TOWNSHIP � RANGE
mr c 3 RoA „,u(�pVUERr Road3 —T--11
SEC.s
at
� ; •'� la It
w..• /O
2rR0 THIS 6 A COMPILATION OF RELOADS AS
' 1 /6 (rjQ THEY APPEAR IN THE RAYSEI COUNT7
y 3 OFFILES AFFECTING THE AREA SHOW
hp THIS DRAWING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR
REFERENCE P-OMSES AND THE 000N-
�J Ud ( R (Y 11 I TT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY IN-
JACCYRAGIES HEREIN 00NTAINED.
O ►• /II a �
w �
\ JA 0 ,SALVATbN /1„MY
/2 �p1
Z ( i• s:.
u.
V •� ` 60 \
,— , , , Sri• �
.` i �s _
e - f to* COR) �JP. 1 Z n r-
�SILV£R`LAKE S7:C 3B y� ® �. co) ..�—
t •F. /BEACH EAN ED .r. ;,.. , .. •� •J,s ..� 'G-'.td �� . V..��„_`�
1 "• 0sy'� '�i•
Page 87
1 - CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
3 AUGUST 10, 1999
4 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE.OF ALLEGIANCE.
5 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by the
6 Recording Secretary.
7
8 II. ROLL CALL.
9 Councilmembers present: Marks, Faust, Cavanaugh, and Thuesen
10 Councilmembers absent: Mayor Ranallo
11 Also present: City Manager Mike Morrison
12 III. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 10, 1999 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
13 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Faust to approve the August 10, 1999 Regular City Council
14 Meeting Agenda with the following addition:
15
16 X. Unfinished Business, Item A., Purchase of 2809 301 Avenue NE
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18 IV. APPROVAL OF JULY 27, 1999 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES.
19 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen, to approve the July 27, 1999 Regular City Council
20 Meeting Minutes with the following changes:
21 Page 3, Line 32, change "6,000.00" to 1600.00".
22 Page 9, Line 26, add "and sump pumps" to the end of the sentence.
23 Page 9, Line 32, change"31" to "46".
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25
26 V. LICENSES/PERMITS/PETITIONS.
27 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen to approve the following licenses and permit:
28 General Contractors License:
29 Superior Roofing Company;Minneapolis, Minnesota working at 2520 Kenzie Terrace
30 Land Recycling Service, Inc., Bloomington, Minnesota working at 2542 Kenzie Terrace
31 Draintiling, Inc., Maplewood, Minnesota
32 Heating Licenses (Renewal):
33 Suburban Air, Minneapolis, Minnesota
34 Krinkie Heating & Air Conditioning, St. Paul, Minnesota
r
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 2
1 Temporary 3.2 Beer Permit:
2 Douglas Parker/Central Park/September 2, 1999/Company Picnic
3 Voting on the motion: Faust, Cavanaugh and Thuesen voted aye. Marks voted nay.
4 The motion carried.
5 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
6 Motion by Thuesen, second by Faust to approve the following claims:
7 A. Engineering/Storm Water Analysis:
8 1. WSB & Associates, Inc. in the amount of-
9 a. $448.50 for professional services regarding general matters from June 1,
10 1999 through June 30, 1999.
1 l b. $103.50.for professional services regarding DNR and FEMA Grant
12 Administration from June 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999.
13 C. $17,101.75 for professional services regarding 1999 Street, Utility, and
14 Stormwater Improvement Construction Services from June 1, 1999 through June
15 30, 1999.
16 d. $4,220.50 for professional services regarding 2000 Street Reconstruction
17 Feasibility Study from June 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999.
18 e. $4,302.00 for professional services regarding Silver Point Park and
19 Central Park Storm Water Improvements Construction from June 1, 1999 through
20 June 30, 1999.
21 f. $828.00 for professional services regarding 1999 Flood Proofing Grant
22 Program from June 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999.
23 g. $655.50 for professional services regarding Harding Street Stormwater
24 Basin Preliminary Design.
25 B. Engineering/GAC Plant; Silver Lake Bridge; St. Anthony Boulevard Sidewalk:
26 1. SEH-RCM in the amount of:
27 a. $5,510.76 for professional services regarding Water Treatment Plant
28 Repair, GAC Filter Construction Administration, Bidding and Inspection from
29 May 1, 1999 through May 31, 1999.
30 b. $1,660.05 for professional services regarding Silver Lake Road Watermain
31 from May 1, 1999 through May 31, 1999.
32 C. $75.64 for professional services regarding St. Anthony Boulevard
33 Sidewalk Reconstruction from May 1, 1999 through.May 31, 1999.
34 C. Home Buyouts:
35 1. Evergreen Land Services in the amount of$120.00 for service and expense from
36 July 1, 1999 through July 17, 1999.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 3 .
1 2. First American Title Insurance Company in the amount of-
2 a. $125.00 per invoice dated July 21, 1999 for services relating to Kuharski
3 property at 2709 Pahl Avenue.
4 b. $125.00 per invoice dated July 21, 1999 for services relating to Tuohy
5 property at 2700 Pahl Avenue.
6 C. $125.00 per invoice dated July 21, 1999 for services relating to Tuohy
7 property at 2704 Pahl Avenue.
8 D. Legal Services/Prosecutions:
9 1. Dorsey & Whitney in the amount of:
10 a. $1,525.00 for legal services rendered through June 30, 1999 regarding
11 Harding Street Ponding Project.
12 b. $827.85 for legal services rendered through June 30, 1999 regarding City
13 of St. Anthony General Matters.
14 2. Foster, Wentzell, Hedback& Brever in the amount of$3,000.00 for legal services
15 rendered per invoice dated August 2, 1999.
16 E. Water Tower Park Project:
17 1. Arri oni Brothers Company in the amount of$115,166.60 per invoice dated July
18 27, 1999 regarding Central Park and Water Tower Playground Improvements.
19 F. 3 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 VII. REPORTS.
22 A. Resolution 99-044, re: Feasibility Study for Year 2000 Street and Utility Improvements
23 on 29`h Avenue NE.
24 Marks, as Mayor Pro Tern, introduced Todd Hubmer, WSB, and invited him to address the
25 Council. Mr. Hubmer reviewed that discussions had been tabled on the feasibility study by the
26 Council to await the results of the public information hearing held on July 27, 1999. The intent
27 of the hearing was to gather information and input from the citizens regarding the 291h Avenue
28 reconstruction. Issues were presented and discussed at the hearing, and Mr. Hubmer referred the
29 Council to his letter of July 30, 1999, which summarized the results.
30
31 Mr. Hubmer stated that the majority of residents had indicated a preference for reconstruction of
32 the entire street from Stinson Boulevard to County Road 88. The residents felt there was a need
33 for parking on 291h Avenue, but concerns had been raised at the hearing regarding the best side of
34 the street to implement parking.
35 Mr. Hubmer further stated that the majority-of residents were opposed to sidewalks along 29th
36 Avenue and the residents had expressed significant concerns surrounding this issue. Residents
37 had also expressed apprehension about widening the street section of 291h Avenue or reducing
38 chokers because speeds may be increased. Mr. Hubmer said the residents felt that additional
� a
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 4
1 stop signs between Stinson Boulevard and Silver Lake Road may be beneficial in reducing
2 speeds.
3 Mr. Hubmer mentioned that the St. Anthony Police Department had been forwarded a copy of
4 the letter from WSB dated July 30, 1999, which included the residents' concerns about excessive
5 speeding along 291h Avenue.
6
7 Mr. Hubmer presented a sketch of 29`h Avenue depicting the proposed reconstruction. He
8 pointed out that the street has been narrowed to the extent allowable to assist in reducing vehicle
9 speeds, and landscaping would be implemented for a visual break. To address the-residents' sug-
10 gestion on additional signage; Mr. Hubmer cautioned that inappropriately placed stops signs
11 could ultimately cause more problems. Mr. Hubmer added that the recommendations include
12 improved signage and striping along 29`''Avenue.
13 Faust inquired if a change in visual appearance, such as multi-colored concrete, would be benefi-
14 cial in reducing speeds, as opposed to stop signs. Mr. Hubmer responded by stating a change in
15 visual appearance would provide some mechanism for reducing traffic speed and could be a con-
16 sideration.
17 Thuesen.expressed understanding about the residents' concern regarding sidewalks, but ques-
18 tioned whether there had been discussion pertaining to the number of children that take 29`' Ave-
19 nue to Silver Lake Road as a route to school. Thuesen felt there could be a safety concern about
20 children and other pedestrians walking along 29`h Avenue to obtain access to a school route or to
21 Silver Point Park, and sidewalks could be beneficial from a safety prospective.
22 Mr. Hubmer responded by stating that the number of pedestrians on 29t1 Avenue would need to
23 be physically counted,but that could be accomplished.
24 Cavanaugh questioned the expansion of the feasibility study from the original plan and the
25 increased cost of such expansion. Mr. Hubmer responded by reviewing the design sketch of 29t1
26 Avenue and providing detailed information about location and importance of chokers, as well as
27 requirements for street size and parking needs. Mr. Hubmer stated that the storm sewer from
28 Roosevelt to Wilson needs to be reconstructed and it was his understanding that the water main
29 was not reconstructed when the street was rebuilt in 1977.
30 Cavanaugh questioned if the County would reject the proposed plan for the street reconstruction
31 since MSA roads are required to be 40 feet. Mr. Hubmer responded that the 40-foot requirement
32 is for parking on both sides of street, and the 28-foot requirement does not allow for parking.
33 Mr. Hubmer stated the County may request design modifications, but the changes are not
34 expected to be significant.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 5
1 Cavanaugh asked for clarification regarding landscaping along 29`h Avenue. Mr. Hubmer
2 referred to the plan, which provided for boulevard trees by the chokers and reducers.
3 Cavanaugh wished to recommend decorative lighting along 29`h Avenue and St. Anthony
4 Boulevard. He felt that lighting would not only improve any safety concerns from residents, but
5 would also soften the residential area.
6 _ Mr. Hubmer reminded the Council that decorative lighting would not be covered by municipal
7 funds unless it was determined that the lighting was a requirement. Marks suggested this topic
8 be resolved at a later time.
9 Julie Kimbllin, 2705 29`'Avenue NE, stated she had attended the public hearing on July 27,
10 1999, but wished to express her concerns to the Council. She stated she had organized a petition
I 1 containing 81 signatures in opposition to the proposed sidewalks and such petition would be filed
12 with the Council. In addition, she was disappointed that she had been unaware until recently of a
13 "Community Plan" that included sidewalks. Ms. Kimbllin stated that it was the residents' belief
14 that sidewalks were not necessary and could decrease property values. She commended Mr.
15 Hubmer for his representation of the issues at the public hearing. Ms. Kimbllin wished to clarify
16 that the recommendations from WSB suggest that if a sidewalk were implemented, it should be
17 placed on the south side of the street. However, she wanted to clarify that the residents at the
18 meeting strongly opposed any sidewalks at all.
19
20 Ms. Kimbllin did not feel that a stop sign was needed at every corner, but possibly a stop sign
21 towards the middle would be more appropriate. Ms. Kimbllin questioned.whether the
22 homeowners would incur the cost of the proposed decorative lighting mentioned by Cavanaugh.
23 Marks thanked Ms. Kimbllin for her input and provided a response to her concern about a Com-
24 munity Plan. Marks stated that a Comprehensive'Plan was put together years ago, and that hear-
25 ings were held and the entire community was invited to speak.
26' Faust clarified that the Comprehensive Plan is considered the "blueprint for the future" and that
27 every city has such a plan. Faust stated that the City encouraged community involvement and he
28 would invite residents to view the Comprehensive Plan on file with the City.
29
30 Thuesen asked the Council if it would be possible to determine if property values would fluctuate
31 due to the addition of sidewalks.
32
33 Marks stated that sidewalks were installed on the street in which he lived after he moved to St.
34 Anthony. He further stated that conditional litter attributed towards sidewalks was not noticed
35 nor were any feelings of invasion of privacy.
v
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 6
1 Cavanaugh stated that making the transition to sidewalks is understandably difficult. On the
2 other hand, he believes that sidewalks are beneficial and that residents are not aware that some of
3 the property to be utilized for sidewalks is considered public property. Cavanaugh feels that the
4 character along 29`h Avenue could be improved by adding sidewalks and decorative lighting.
5 Cavanaugh clarified that he would prefer buried cables for the decorative lighting. In retrospect,
6 Cavanaugh stated that the intent of the proposed project is to solve the storm water problem and
7 he would not support any insistence on sidewalks. He stated, however, that from a safety
8 prospective, sidewalks, decorative lighting, and landscaping could have a calming effect on the
9 neighborhood.
10 Martha Johnson, 2816 291h Avenue, stated that she believes that lot size is not being considered
11 in relation to sidewalks. She requested that the Council considered the possibility of decreased
12 property values upon installation of sidewalks due to reduction of lot size.
13 Richard Perrin,.3217 29`'Avenue, stated he had resided in St. Anthony since he.was three years
14 old and has lived on 291h Avenue for 13 years. He confirmed that the residents are opposed to
15 sidewalks, except around park areas. He concluded that, after measuring the lot for his home, a
16 sidewalk, if implemented, would be approximately 20 feet from his front door.
17
18 Mr. Perrin offered that many residents feel a safer street could be accomplished by a stronger
19 police presence in the area. He stated that most of the children who wait for the school buses
20 wait in their own driveways or a driveway close by their home, and the absence of sidewalks has
21 not been a concern.
22
23 Mr. Perrin questioned if the proposed reconnection fee to homeowners of$400 is a guaranteed
24 figure.
25
26 Marks asked City Manager Mike Morrison to respond: Mornson stated residents would be
27 assessed a water reconnection fee of$400.00, and he then reviewed the process of obtairiing
28 MSA funds for the balance of the street reconstruction.
29
30 Marks reassured Mr. Perrin that homeowners would not be assessed charges, other than the
31 reconnection fee, due to the street reconstruction. Cavanaugh disagreed that assurances could be
32 given as MSA funds have not been received. Faust clarified that the reconstruction would not
33 occur until MSA funds have been received. Cavanaugh expressed concern that MSA funds
34 would not be approved because such funds were not mentioned in the original plan from the task
35 force.
36 Morrison stated that the City had raised storm sewer rates in previous years to help.solve the
37 flooding problem. He further clarified that MSA funding was not in the original plan from the
38 task force because the firm of WSB was originally hired to solve the flooding problem and not to
39 reconstruct the streets. The policy has been redirected to include the extension of the project.
v �
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 7
1 Sandy Callen, 3204 29`h Avenue, stated that she has three children and is concerned about having
2 sidewalks take up part of the play area in the front yard. She is also concerned about strangers
3 utilizing the sidewalk and the impact it would have on her children since the sidewalk would be
4 close to her home. Ms. Callen does not feel that sidewalks are a necessity, and would be inter-
s ested in a study on the impact of sidewalks and stranger safety.
6 Faust reviewed that the issue had been a flooding problem from Silver Lake Road to the west and
7 also involved 29' Avenue. He clarified that Mr. Hubmer had been requested to consider long-
8 term goals in presenting a plan in anticipation of saving money for the community in the future.
9 Faust stated that issues naturally evolved around the plan and sidewalk and.lighting discussions
10 have now occurred. He stressed that the intent is doing the project correctly and in the best
11 interest of the community for both short-'and long-term goals. Faust reiterated that the Council
12 is interested in community input and does not harbor preconceived notions regarding the
13 outcome of the project.
14
15 Faust commented that the project would not encumber the community by starting without
16 approved financing. He added that he viewed the proposed signage, choke points, and
17 landscaping as beneficial in providing a calming effect for the community.
18 Thuesen echoed Faust's opinions and reiterated that the City is attempting first to solve flooding
19 issues. He asserted that flexibility and compromise are tantamount to the success of the discus-
20 sions and the project itself. He felt that the residents' opinions needed to be heard and
21 considered and affirmed that none of the plans have been finalized. Thuesen stressed the
22 importance of completing the project correctly the first time, and placing the community in a
23 good position for the future. In regard to the issue of sidewalks, Thuesen felt that discussions
24 were vital to achieving a positive outcome.
25 Cavanaugh commented that the discussion was centering on Resolution 99-044 and the estimated
26 cost of$2,630,000. He stated that he would like to add to the recommendations that the issue of
27 decorative lighting with buried cables be considered by the Council. He clarified that he does
28 not support reconstruction from 29`h Avenue to Highway 88. He felt that the proposed
29 landscaping would be beneficial. Cavanaugh further stated that he primarily supported solving
30 the flooding problem and, at this point, would not support sidewalks in light of the petition. He
31 also mentioned he would discuss with the police department an issue that has arisen regarding
32 loud mufflers in the City.
33 Marks reviewed the issues at hand and stated that there are many choices to be considered. He
34 felt that the decorative lighting issue needs to be evaluated; the sidewalk issue discussed more;
35 and the financing put into place. He mentioned the possibility of completing the project in two
36 phases or all at once, and asking WSB and staff to evaluate other plans.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 8
1 Mornson wished to clarify for Julie Kimbllin that he believes it would be the responsibility of the
.2 homeowners to pay for decorative lighting along the street. Cavanaugh disagreed stating the
3 street would be considered an MSA road, and therefore MSA funds could pay for the lights.
4 Mornson was referring to the decorative lights in the Skycroft area where the residents were
5 assessed for the difference.
6 Marks pointed out that Don Johnson, 2816 29`h Avenue, had sent a message to the Council that
7 he was unable to attend the meeting, but wished to state his support for the street project;with
8 the exception of the sidewalks.
9 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Thuesen to table Resolution 99-044 until the first Council
10 meeting of September 14, 1999.
11 Motion carried unanimously.
12 Marks reminded the Council that the first meeting for the month of September would be
13 September 14, 1999.
14
15 B. Councilmembers.
16 Thuesen extended congratulations to the Parks Commission for the success of Water Tower Park.
17 He had been unable to attend the grand opening, but was impressed with the progress and out-
18 come of the park. He wished to express his sincere appreciation to the Commission for the dedi-
19 cation involved in making Water Tower Park a success.
20 Faust agreed with Thuesen's remarks and encouraged residents to enjoy and utilize the park. He
21 stated the park was an obvious success during VillageFest and thanked the Commission as well
22 for the success and accomplishment of Water Tower Park. Faust said that VillageFest was an
23 exciting celebration, which included a street dance, parade and a variety of other activities. Faust
24 reported that the Kiwanis pancake breakfast served a large amount of people and he was pleased
25 that the event was a success.
26 Faust wished to make the public aware of a need for special commendation. In reading the Fire
27 Chief's report, it came to his attention that two of the Public Works employees witnessed an
28 accident where individuals needed assistance. After calling for emergency assistance, the two
29 Public Works employees administered first aid until additional help arrived. Faust wished to
30 commend Tom Owens and Merrill Fisher for their heroic efforts and to extend appreciation on
31 behalf of the citizens that were served.
32
33 Cavanaugh announced that he attended the National Night Out festivities and expressed
34 satisfaction with the result of the event. He would encourage additional participants for next
35 year. Cavanaugh confirmed that the dedication of Water Tower Park was successful and stated
36 that he had received many positive comments from residents. Cavanaugh wished to bestow con-
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 9
1 gratulations to the Parks Commission, Public Works Director Jay Hartman, City Staff, and vol-
2 unteers for their dedication in making Water Tower Park successful.
3 Cavanaugh suggested two changes for the park. One is the portable restrooms, or satellites. He
4 would like to implement permanent restrooms. The, second suggestion is the addition of waste
5 containers. Public Works Director Jay Hartman stated the waste containers and the benches
6 have been ordered and are expected to be shipped within a week.
7 Cavanaugh stated that VillageFest was a festive event and enjoyed by many residents. Nativity
8 Lutheran was a new participant this year and was successful in giving away a large amount of ice
9 cream. He stated there were 54 units in the parade, with a talent show and band. He wished to
10 thank the City for sponsoring the fireworks display, and the City Manager and Staff in providing
11 assistance to the volunteers. Cavanaugh expressed gratitude to Gary Shun as Chairman of
12 VillageFest.
13
14 C. Mayor.
15 Marks spoke as Mayor Pro Tem, and agreed that National Night Out was an event to remember.
16 He stated that each year there are more participants and this adds to the enthusiasm. Marks
17 believed National Night Out was an interesting event and hoped to encourage more residents to
18 participate.
19 Marks mentioned that he attended the recent Parks Commission meeting and that the satellites
20 were a topic of discussion. He clarified that the engineering firm of BRW was putting together a
21 cost proposal regarding the satellites and other remaining issues for the park, but the preliminary
22 cost estimate exceeded the Parks Commissions' expectations. In any event, a proposal from the
23 Parks Commission regarding Silver Point Park and Water Tower Park would be forthcoming
24 once some cost issues have been resolved.
25 Marks spoke about the Sister City Organization. He stated that a request had been received from
26 Salo, Finland renewing interest in an exchange program for next year. Marks reviewed the suc-
27 cesg and excitement of the exchange this year and presented brochures that are available for more
28 information. Marks encouraged participation in the Sister City Organization and also mentioned
29 the group will be holding an annual meeting soon and would welcome additional leadership
30 capabilities.
31 D. City Manager.
32 Morrison reported that he had attended a fourth meeting with the new owners of the St. Anthony
33 Shopping Center and felt the progress is of a positive nature. There was a consensus that a
34 significant area will be designated for green space, which could include a gazebo. The shopping
35 center owners and the new prospective owners of Town and Country have shown willingness to
36 cooperate in implementing the proposals. Morrison stated it is possible that the HRA would
37 contribute funds to design the green space, and the City would maintain such green space.
City Council Meeting Minutes,
August 10, 1999
Page 10
1 Another concept is that developer or shopping center owners would construct the green space
2 based on City approval. .Morrison stated that the architect for the shopping center has experience
3 in center redevelopment. Morrison encouraged the Council to review the.,architect's past
4 projects.
5 Mornson reminded the Council that a conditional use permit for Town and Country would be
6 forthcoming on the agenda at a future meeting.
7 Cavanaugh related that he had received telephone calls from.residents about the possible sale of
8 motorcycles at the old Town and Country site. Mornson reminded the Council that retail sales
9 are a permitted use.
10 Mornson stated that more negotiations may take place regarding the last property on Kenzie
11 Terrace. Morrison informed the Council that union contracts are up for renewal as of December
12 31, 1999 and more information will be forthcoming on that issue at a later date. He will be
13 negotiating the contracts with the three unions over the next several months.
14 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None.
15 IX. NEW BUSINESS.
16 A. Resolution 99-053, re: ISD #282's Request to Construct a Fire Service Road on Ci
17 Property.
18 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Thuesen to approve the request from ISD #282, as a part of
19 their construction of a fire road, for rehabilitation of the City-owned service road located on the
20 west side of the St. Anthony/New Brighton Middle School at a cost to the City of$8,933.00.
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22
23 B. Resolution 99-054, re: Deferment Requests for 1999 Special Assessments.
24 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen to approve that the following special assessments for the
25 1999 Street Improvements Projects be deferred:
26 1) Marjorie M. Hirt $2,271.20
27 2815 Wilson Street
28 St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
29 2) Ann E. Larson $3,295.21
30 2813 Pahl Avenue
31 St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
32 Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 11
1 X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
2 A. Purchase of 2809 30" Avenue NE.
3 Marks invited Todd Hubmer,-WSB, to address the Council regarding the purchase of 2809 30t1
4 Avenue NE. Morrison requested that Mr. Hubmer provide information that would justify the
5 City's purchase of the property. In response, Mr. Hubmer distributed copies of a memo dated
6 August 10, 1999 from WSB & Associates.
7 Mr. Hubmer reviewed the memo stating that the property is located within the limits of the pro-
8 posed Harding Street Storm Water Improvement. The benefits of purchasing the property at this
9 time include: (1) relieving the need to acquire ponding easements over the rear.portion of the
10 property; (2) utilizing the property to construct overflow swale; (3) utilizing the parcel as the
11 construction and maintenance access to the storm water holding area; and (4) reducing the need
12 for easements to be acquired form adjacent properties to the west.
13 Marks asked if the HRA or the City would be responsible for purchasing the property. Morrison
14 stated the responsible party would depend on the projected outcome of the property.
15 Marks questioned the timeline before a decision would be made concerning the Harding issue.
16 Mr. Hubmer stated that progress is being made and that a public meeting would be held in
17 September 1999. Marks clarified his concern about the timeframe that the Council had to make a
18 decision. Mr. Hubmer responded by stating an estimate would be the beginning of next year.
19 Morrison stated that the question immediately at hand is whether or not the Council wished to
20 direct Staff to negotiate a purchase agreement for the property at 2809 30th Avenue NE.
21 Faust stated that if the Council decided to proceed with negotiations for the purchase, it should
22 be made clear that the property would stay in the current condition until due diligence studies are
23 completed by the engineers. Faust clarified that if the studies determined that the property was
24 not conducive to the City's original plan, then the property could be sold in its original condition.
25 Marks affirmed that the purchase of the property is an opportunity and does not bind the City at
26 this point. He agreed that if the project is determined to be unfeasible, the property could be
27 resold in its original condition.
28 Thuesen reiterated that it should be made apparent to the residents that the potential purchase of
29 the property is simply a process and that the City is not buying the property for the sole purpose
30 of tearing it down. That could be the ultimate result, but it is not the sole original intent.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 12
1 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Faust to direct City Manager to take the necessary steps to
2 engage in a purchase agreement for 2809.30`h Avenue and to return to the Council with a
3 progress report:
4
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
7 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Faust to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
8 Motion carried unanimously.
9 Respectfully submitted
p Y
10 Sue Selseth
11 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
12
13 Mayor
14 ATTEST:
15 City Clerk
�1
1 - CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
3 AUGUST 10, 1999
4 . I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
5 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 O.'m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by the
6 Recording Secretary.
7
8 II. ROLL CALL.
9 Councilmembers present: Marks, Faust, Cavanaugh, and Thuesen
10 Councilmembers absent: Mayor Ranallo
11 Also present: City Manager Mike Morrison
12 III. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 10, 1999 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
13 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Faust to approve the August 10, 1999 Regular City Council
14 Meeting Agenda with the following addition:
15
16 X. Unfinished Business, Item A., Purchase of 2809 30`h Avenue NE
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18 IV. APPROVAL OF JULY 27, 1999 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES.
19 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen, to approve the July 27, 1999 Regular City Council
20 Meeting Minutes with the following changes:
21 Page 3, Line 32, change "6,000.00" to 1600.00".
22 Page 9, Line 26, add "and sump pumps" to the end of the sentence.
23 Page 9, Line 32, change "31" to "46".
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25
26 V. LICENSES/PERMITS/PETITIONS.
27 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen to approve the following licenses and permit:
28 General Contractors License:
29 Superior Roofing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota working at 2520 Kenzie Terrace
30 Land Recycling Service, Inc.,Bloomington, Minnesota working at 2542 Kenzie Terrace
31 Draintiling, Inc., Maplewood, Minnesota
32 Heating Licenses (Renewal
33 Suburban Air, Minneapolis, Minnesota
34 Krinkie Heating & Air Conditioning, St. Paul, Minnesota
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 2
1 Temporary 3.2 Beer Permit:
2 Douglas Parker/Central Park/September 2, 1999/Company Picnic
3 Voting on the motion: Faust, Cavanaugh and Thuesen voted aye. Marks voted nay.
4 The motion carried.
5 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
6 Motion by Thuesen, second by Faust to approve the following claims:
7 A. Engineering/Storm Water Analysis:
8 1. WSB & Associates. Inc. in the amount of:
9 a. $448.50 for professional services regarding general matters from June 1,
10 1999 through June 30, 1999.
11 b. $103.50 for professional services regarding DNR and FEMA Grant
12 Administration from June 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999.
13 c. . $17,101.75 for professional services regarding 1999 Street, Utility, and
14 Stormwater Improvement Construction Services from June 1, 1999 through June
15 30, 1999.
16 d. $4,220.50 for professional services regarding 2000 Street Reconstruction
17 Feasibility Study from June 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999.
18 e. $4,302.00 for professional services regarding Silver Point Park and
19 Central Park Storm Water Improvements Construction from June 1, 1999 through
20 June 30, 1999.
21 f. $828.00 for professional services regarding 1999 Flood Proofing Grant
22 Program from June 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999.
23 g. $655.50 for professional services regarding Harding Street Stormwater
24 Basin Preliminary Design.
25 B. Engineering/GAC Plant; Silver Lake Bridge; St. Anthony Boulevard Sidewalk:
26 1. SEH-RCM in the amount of:
27 a. $5,510.76 for professional services regarding Water Treatment Plant
28 Repair, GAC Filter Construction Administration, Bidding and Inspection from
29 May 1, 1999 through May 31, 1999.
30 b. $1,660.05 for professional services regarding Silver Lake Road Watermain
31 from May 1, 1999 through May 31, 1999.
32 C. $75.64 for professional services regarding St. Anthony Boulevard
33 Sidewalk Reconstruction from May 1, 1999 through May 31, 1999.
34 C. Home Buyouts:
35 1. Evergreen Land Services in the amount of$120.00 for service and expense from
36 July 1, 1999 through July 17, 1999.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 3
1 2. First American Title Insurance Company in the amount of: .
2 a. $125.00 per invoice dated July 21, 1999 for services relating to Kuharski
3 property at 2709 Pahl Avenue.
4 b. $125.00 per invoice dated July 21, 1999 for services relating to Tuohy
5 property at 2700 Pahl Avenue.
6 C. $125.00 per invoice dated July 21, 1999 for services relating to Tuohy
7 property at 2704 Pahl Avenue.
8 D. Legal Services/Prosecutions:
9 1. Dorsev & Whitney in the amount o£
10 a. $1,525.00 for legal services rendered through June 30, 1999 regarding
11 Harding Street Ponding Project.
12 b. $827.85 for legal services rendered through June 30, 1999 regarding City
13 of St. Anthony General Matters.
14 2. Foster,-Wentzell;Hedback& Brever in-the amount of$3,000.00 for legal services
15 rendered per invoice dated August 2, 1999.
16 E. Water Tower Park Project:
17 1. Arrigoni Brothers Company in the amount of$115,166.60 per invoice dated July
18 27, 1999 regarding Central Park and Water Tower Playground Improvements.
19 F. 3 pages of Verified.Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 VII. REPORTS.
22 A. Resolution 99-044, re: Feasibility Study for Year 2000 Street and Utility Improvements
23 1 on 291h Avenue NE.
24 Marks, as Mayor Pro Tem, introduced Todd Hubmer, WSB, and invited him to address the
25 Council. Mr. Hubmer reviewed that discussions had been tabled on the feasibility study by the
26 Council to await the results of the public information hearing held on July 27, 1999. The intent
27 of the hearing was to gather information and input from the citizens regarding the 29`h Avenue
28 reconstruction. Issues were presented and discussed at the hearing, and Mr. Hubmer referred the
29 Council to his letter of July 30, 1999, which summarized the results.
30
31 Mr. Hubmer stated that the majority of residents had indicated a preference for reconstruction of
32 the entire street from Stinson Boulevard to County Road 88. The residents felt there was a need
33 for parking on 29`h Avenue, but concerns had been raised at the hearing regarding the best side of
34 the street to implement parking.
35 Mr. Hubmer further stated that the majority of residents were opposed to-sidewalks along 29th
36 Avenue and the residents had expressed significant concerns surrounding this issue. Residents
37 had also expressed apprehension about widening the street section of 291h Avenue or reducing
38 chokers because speeds may be increased. Mr. Hubmer said the residents felt that additional
i
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 4
1 stop signs between Stinson Boulevard and Silver Lake Road may be beneficial in reducing
2 speeds.
3 Mr. Hubmer mentioned that the St. Anthony Police Department had been forwarded a copy of
4 the letter from WSB dated July 30, 1999, which included the residents' concerns about excessive
5 speeding along 291h Avenue.
6
7 Mr. Hubmer presented a sketch of 29`h Avenue depicting the proposed reconstruction. He
8 pointed out that the street.has been narrowed to the extent allowable to assist in reducing vehicle
9 speeds, and landscaping would be implemented for a visual break. To address the residents' sug-
10 gestion on additional signage, Mr. Hubmer cautioned that inappropriately placed stops signs
11 could ultimately cause more problems. Mr. Hubmer added that the recommendations include
12 improved signage and striping along 29`h Avenue.
13 Faust inquired if a change in visual appearance, such as multi-colored concrete, would be benefi-
14 cial in reducing speeds, as opposed to stop signs. Mr. Hubmer responded by stating a change in
15 visual appearance would provide some mechanism for reducing traffic speed and could be a con-
16 sideration.
17 Thuesen expressed understanding about the residents' concern regarding sidewalks, but ques-
18 tioned whether there had been discussion pertaining to the number of children that take 29`h Ave-
19 nue to Silver Lake Road as a route to school. Thuesen felt there could be a safety concern about
20 children and other pedestrians walking along 291h Avenue to obtain access to a school route or to
21 Silver Point Park, and sidewalks could be beneficial from a safety prospective.
22 Mr. Hubmer responded by stating that the number of pedestrians on 29`h Avenue would need to
23 be physically counted, but that could be accomplished.
24 Cavanaugh questioned the expansion of the feasibility study from the original plan and the
25 increased cost of such expansion. Mr. Hubmer responded by reviewing the design sketch of 29`'
26 Avenue and providing detailed information about location and importance of chokers, as well as
27 requirements for street size and parking needs. Mr. Hubmer stated that the storm sewer from
28 Roosevelt to Wilson needs to be reconstructed and it was his understanding that the water main
29 was not reconstructed when the street was rebuilt in 1977.
30 Cavanaugh questioned if the County would reject the proposed plan for the street reconstruction
31 since MSA roads are required to be 40 feet. Mr. Hubmer responded that the 40-foot requirement
32 is for parking on both sides of street, and the 28-foot requirement does not allow for parking.
33 Mr. Hubmer.stated the County may request design modifications, but the changes are not
34 expected to be significant.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 5
1 Cavanaugh asked for clarification regarding landscaping along 29" Avenue. Mr. Hubmer
2 referred to the plan, which provided for boulevard trees by the chokers and reducers.
3 Cavanaugh wished to recommend decorative lighting along 29`h Avenue and St. Anthony
4 Boulevard. He felt that lighting would not only improve any safety concerns from residents, but
5 would also soften the residential area.
6 Mr. Hubmer reminded the Council that decorative lighting would not be covered by municipal
7 funds unless it was determined that the lighting was a requirement. Marks suggested this topic
8 be resolved at a later time.
9 Julie Kimbllin, 2705 291 Avenue NE, stated she had attended the public hearing on July 27,
10 1999,but wished to express her concerns to the Council. She stated she had organized a petition
11 containing 81 signatures in opposition to the proposed sidewalks and such petition would be filed
12 with the Council. In addition, she was disappointed that she had been unaware until recently of a
13 "Community Plan" that included sidewalks. Ms. Kimbllin stated that it was the residents' belief
14 that sidewalks were not necessary and could decrease property values. She commended Mr.
15 Hubmer for his representation of the issues at the public hearing. Ms. Kimbllin wished to clarify
16 that the recommendations from WSB suggest that if a sidewalk were implemented, it should be
17 placed on the south side of the street. However, she wanted to clarify that the residents at the
18 meeting strongly opposed any sidewalks at all.
19
20 Ms. Kimbllin did not feel that a stop sign was needed at every corner, but possibly a stop sign
21 towards the middle would be more appropriate. Ms. Kimbllin questioned whether the
22 homeowners would incur the cost of the proposed decorative lighting mentioned by Cavanaugh.
23 Marks thanked Ms. Kimbllin for her input and provided a response to her concern about a Com-
24 munity Plan. Marks stated.that a Comprehensive Plan was put together years ago, and that hear-
25 ings were held and the entire community was invited to speak.
26 Faust clarified that the Comprehensive Plan is considered the "blueprint for the future" and that
27 every city has such a plan. Faust stated that the City encouraged community involvement and he
28 would invite residents to view the Comprehensive Plan on file with the City.
29
30 Thuesen asked the Council if it would be possible to determine if property values would fluctuate
31 due to the addition of sidewalks.
32
33 Marks stated that sidewalks were installed on the street in which he lived after he moved to St.
34 Anthony. He further stated that conditional litter attributed towards sidewalks was not noticed
35 nor were any feelings of invasion of privacy.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 6
1 Cavanaugh stated that making the transition to sidewalks is understandably difficult. On the
2 other hand, he believes that sidewalks are beneficial and that residents are not aware that some of
3 the property to be utilized for sidewalks is considered public property. Cavanaugh feels that the
4 character along 29`h Avenue could be improved by adding sidewalks and decorative lighting.
5 Cavanaugh clarified that he would prefer buried cables for the decorative lighting. In retrospect,
6 Cavanaugh stated that the intent of the proposed project is to solve the storm water problem and
7 he would not support any insistence on sidewalks. He stated, however, that from a safety
8 prospective, sidewalks, decorative lighting, and landscaping could have a calming effect on the
9 neighborhood.
10 Martha Johnson, 2816 291h Avenue, stated that she believes that lot size is not being considered
11 in relation to sidewalks. She requested that the Council considered the possibility of decreased
12 property values upon installation of sidewalks due to reduction of lot size.
13 Richard Perrin, 3217 291h Avenue, stated he had resided in St. Anthony since he was three years
14 old and has lived on 291h Avenue for 13 years. He confirmed that the residents are opposed to
15 sidewalks, except around park areas. He concluded that, after measuring the lot for his home, a
16 sidewalk, if implemented, would be approximately 20 feet from his front door.
17
18 Mr. Perrin offered that many residents feel a safer:street could be accomplished by a stronger
19 police presence in the area. He stated that most of the children who wait for the school buses
20 wait in their own driveways or a driveway close by their home, and the absence of sidewalks has
21 not been a concern.
22
23 Mr. Perrin questioned if the proposed reconnection fee to homeowners of$400 is a guaranteed
24 figure.
25
26 Marks asked City Manager Mike Mornson to respond. Mornson stated residents would be
27 assessed a water reconnection fee of$400.00, and he then reviewed the process of obtaining
28 MSA funds for the balance of the street reconstruction.
29
30 Marks reassured Mr. Perrin that homeowners would not be assessed charges, other than the
31 reconnection fee, due to the street reconstruction. Cavanaugh disagreed that assurances could be
32 given as MSA funds have not been received. Faust clarified that the reconstruction would not
33 occur until MSA funds have been received. Cavanaugh expressed concern that MSA funds
34 would not be approved because such funds were not mentioned in the original plan from the task
35 force.
36 Mornson stated that the City had raised storm sewer rates in previous years to help solve the
37 flooding problem. He further clarified that MSA funding was not in the original plan from the
38 task force because the firm of WSB was originally hired to solve the flooding problem and not to
39 reconstruct the streets. The policy has been redirected to include the extension of the project.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 7
1 Sandy Callen, 3204 29`h Avenue, stated that she has three children and is concerned about having
2 sidewalks take up part of the play area in the front yard. She is also concerned about strangers
3 utilizing the sidewalk and the impact,-it would have on her children since the sidewalk would be
4 close to her home. Ms. Callen does not feel that sidewalks are a necessity, and would be inter-
5 ested in a study on the impact of sidewalks and stranger safety.
6 Faust reviewed that the issue had been a flooding problem from Silver Lake Road to the west and
7 also involved 291h Avenue. He clarified that Mr. Hubmer had been requested to consider long-
8 term goals in presenting a plan in anticipation of saving money for the community in the future.
9 Faust stated that issues naturally evolved around the plan and sidewalk and lighting discussions
10 have now occurred. He stressed that the intent is doing the project correctly and in the best
11 interest of the community for both short- and long-term goals. Faust reiterated that the Council
12 is interested in community input and does not harbor preconceived notions regarding the
13 outcome of"the project.
14
15 Faust commented that the project would not encumber the community by starting without
16 approved financing. He added that he viewed the proposed signage, choke points, and
17 landscaping as beneficial in providing a calming effect for the community.
18 Thuesen echoed Faust's opinions and reiterated that the City is attempting first to solve flooding
19 issues: He asserted that flexibility and compromise are tantamount to the success of the discus-
20 sions and the project itself. He felt that the residents' opinions needed to be heard and
21 considered and affirmed that none of the plans have been finalized. Thuesen stressed the
22 importance of completing the project correctly the first time, and placing the community in a
23 good position for the future. In regard to the issue of sidewalks, Thuesen felt that discussions
24 were vital to achieving a positive outcome.
25 Cavanaugh commented that the discussion was centering on Resolution 99-044 and the estimated
26 cost of$2,630,000. He stated that he would like to add to the recommendations that the issue of
27 decorative lighting with buried cables be considered by the Council. He clarified that he does
28 not support reconstruction from 29th Avenue to Highway 88. He felt that the proposed
29 landscaping would be beneficial. Cavanaugh further stated that he primarily supported solving
30 the flooding problem and, at this point, would not support sidewalks in light of the petition. He
31 also mentioned he would discuss with the police department an issue that has arisen regarding
32 loud mufflers in the City.
33 Marks reviewed the issues at hand and stated that there are many choices to be considered. He
34 felt that the decorative lighting issue needs to be evaluated; the sidewalk issue discussed more;
35 and the financing put into place. He mentioned the possibility of completing the project in two
36 phases or all at once, and asking WSB and staff to evaluate other plans.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 8
1 Mornson wished to clarify for Julie Kimbllin that he believes it would be the responsibility of the
2 homeowners to pay for decorative lighting along the street. Cavanaugh disagreed stating the
3 street would be considered an MSA road, and therefore MSA funds could pay for the lights.
4 Mornson was referring to the decorative lights in the Skycroft area where the residents were
5 assessed for the difference.
6 Marks pointed out that Don Johnson, 2816 29' Avenue, had sent a message to the Council that
7 he was unable to attend the meeting, but wished to state his support for the street project, with
8 the exception of the sidewalks.
9 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Thuesen to table Resolution 99-044 until the first Council
10 meeting of September 14, 1999.
1 l Motion carried unanimously.
12 Marks reminded the Council that the first meeting for the month of September would be
13 September 14, 1999.
14
15 B. Councilmembers.
16 Thuesen extended congratulations to the Parks Commission for the success of Water Tower Park.
17 He had been unable to attend the grand opening, but was impressed with the progress and out-
18 come of the park. He wished to express his sincere appreciation to the Commission for the dedi-
19 cation involved in making Water Tower Park a success.
20 Faust agreed with Thuesen's remarks and encouraged residents to enjoy and utilize the park. He
2i stated the park was an obvious success during VillageFest and thanked the Commission as well
22 for the success and accomplishment of Water Tower Park. Faust said that VillageFest was an
23 exciting celebration, which included a street dance,parade and a variety of other activities. Faust
24 reported that the Kiwanis pancake breakfast served a large amount of people and he was pleased
25 that the event was a success.
26 Faust wished to make the public aware of a need for special commendation. In reading the Fire
27 Chief's report, it came to his attention that two of the Public Works employees witnessed an
28 accident where individuals needed assistance. After calling for emergency assistance, the two
29 Public Works employees administered first aid until additional help arrived. Faust wished to
30 commend Tom Owens and Merrill Fisher for their heroic efforts and to extend appreciation on
31 behalf of the citizens that were served.
32
33 Cavanaugh announced that he attended the National Night Out festivities and expressed
34 satisfaction with the result of the event. He would encourage additional participants for next
35 year. Cavanaugh confirmed that the dedication of Water Tower Park was successful and stated
36 that he had received many positive comments from residents. Cavanaugh wished to bestow con-
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 9
1 gratulations to the Parks Commission, Public Works Director Jay Hartman, City Staff, and vol-
2 unteers for_their dedication in making Water Tower Park successful.
3 Cavanaugh suggested two changes for the park. One is the portable restrooms, or satellites. He
4 would like to implement permanent restrooms. The second suggestion is the addition of waste
5 containers. Public Works Director Jay Hartman stated the waste containers and the-benches
6 have been ordered and are expected to be shipped within a week.
7 Cavanaugh stated that VillageFest was a festive event and enjoyed by many residents. Nativity
8 Lutheran was a new participant this year and was successful in giving away a large amount of ice
9 cream. He stated there were 54 units in the parade, with a talent show and band. He wished to
10 thank the City for sponsoring the fireworks display, and the City Manager and Staff in providing
11 assistance to the volunteers. Cavanaugh expressed gratitude to Gary Shun as Chairman of
12 VillageFest.
13
14 C. Mayor.
15 Marks spoke as Mayor Pro Tem, and agreed that National Night Out was an event to remember.
16 He stated that each year there are more participants and this adds to the enthusiasm. Marks
17 believed National Night Out was an interesting event and hoped to encourage more residents to
18 participate.
19 Marks mentioned that he attended the recent Parks Commission meeting and that the satellites
20 were a topic of discussion. He clarified that the engineering firm of BRW was putting together a
21 cost proposal regarding the satellites and other remaining issues for the park, but the preliminary
22 cost estimate exceeded the Parks Commissions' expectations. In any event, a proposal from the
23 Parks Commission regarding Silver Point Park and Water Tower Park would be forthcoming
24 once some cost issues have been resolved.
25 Marks spoke about the Sister City Organization. He stated that a request had been received from
26 Salo, Finland renewing interest in an exchange program for next year. Marks reviewed the suc-
27 cess and excitement of the exchange this year and presented brochures that are available for more
28 information. Marks encouraged participation in the Sister City Organization and also mentioned
29 the group will be holding an annual meeting soon and would welcome additional leadership
30 capabilities.
31 D. City Manager.
32 Morrison reported that he had attended a fourth meeting with the new owners of the St. Anthony
33 Shopping Center and felt the progress is of a positive nature. There was a consensus that a
34 significant area will be designated for green space,-which could include a gazebo. The shopping
35 center owners and the new prospective owners of Town and Country have shown willingness to
36 cooperate in implementing the proposals. Morrison stated it is possible that the HRA would
37 contribute funds to design the green space, and the City would maintain such green space.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 10
1 Another concept is that developer or shopping center owners would construct the green space
2 based on City approval. Mornson stated that the architect for the shopping center has experience
3 in center redevelopment. Mornson encouraged the Council to review the architect's past
4 projects.
5 Mornson reminded the Council that a conditional use permit for Town and Country would be
6 forthcoming on the agenda at a future meeting.
7 Cavanaugh related that he had received telephone calls from residents about the possible sale of
8 motorcycles at the old Town and Country site. Mornson reminded the Council that retail sales
9 are a permitted use.
10 Mornson stated that more negotiations may take place regarding the last property on Kenzie
11 Terrace. Mornson informed the Council that union contracts are up for renewal as of December.
12 31, 1999 and more information will be forthcoming on that issue at a later date. He will be
13 negotiating the contracts with the three unions over the next several months.
14 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
15 IX. NEW BUSINESS.
16 A. Resolution 99-053, re: ISD #282's Request to Construct a Fire Service Road on Ci1y
17 Property.
18 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Thuesen to approve the request from ISD #282, as a part of
19 their construction of a fire road, for rehabilitation of the City-owned service road located on the
20 west side of the St. Anthony/New.Brighton Middle School at a cost to the City of$8,933.00.
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22
23 B. Resolution 99-054, re: Deferment Requests for 1999 Special Assessments..
24 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen to approve that the following special assessments for the
25 1999 Street Improvements Projects be deferred:
26 1) Marjorie M. Hirt $2,271.20
27 2815 Wilson Street
28 St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
29 2) Ann E. Larson $3,295.21
30 2813 Pahl Avenue
31 St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
32 Motion carried unanimously.
-r
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 11
1 X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
2 A. Purchase of 2809 30`'Avenue NE.
3 Marks invited Todd Hubmer, WSB, to address the Council regarding the purchase of 2809 301
4 Avenue NE. Morrison requested that Mr. Hubmer provide information that would justify the
5 City's purchase of the property. In response, Mr. Hubmer distributed copies of a memo dated
6 August 10, 1999 from WSB & Associates.
7 Mr. Hubmer reviewed the memo stating that the property is located within the limits of the pro-
8 posed Harding Street Storm Water Improvement. The benefits of purchasing the property at this
9 time include: (1) relieving the need to acquire ponding easements over the rear portion of the
10 property; (2)utilizing the property to construct overflow swale; (3) utilizing the parcel as the
11 construction and maintenance access to the storm water holding area; and (4) reducing the need
12 for easements to be acquired form adjacent properties to the west.
13 Marks asked if the HRA or the City would be responsible for purchasing the property. Morrison
14 stated the responsible party would depend on the projected outcome of the property.
15 Marks questioned the timeline before a decision would be made concerning the Harding issue.
16 Mr. Hubmer stated that progress is being made and that a public meeting would be held in
17 September 1999. Marks clarified his concern about the timeframe that the Council had to make a
18 decision. Mr. Hubmer responded by stating an estimate would be the beginning of next year.
19 Mornson stated that the question immediately at hand is whether or not the Council wished to
20 direct Staff to negotiate a purchase agreement for the property at 2809 30"Avenue NE.
21 Faust stated that if the Council decided to proceed with negotiations for the purchase, it should
22 be made clear that the property would stay in the current condition until due diligence studies are
23 completed by the engineers. Faust clarified that if the studies determined that the property was
24 not conducive to the City's original plan, then the property could be sold in its original condition.
25 Marks affirmed that the purchase of the property is an opportunity and does not bind the City at
26 this point. He agreed that if the project is determined to be unfeasible, the property could be
27 resold in its original condition.
28 Thuesen reiterated that it should be made apparent to the residents that the potential purchase of
29 the property is simply a process and that the City is not buying the property for the sole purpose
30 of tearing it down. That could be the ultimate result, but it is not the sole original intent.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 10, 1999
Page 12
1 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Faust to direct City Manager to take the necessary steps to
2 engage in a purchase agreement for 2809 30"Avenue and to return to the Council with a-
3 progress report.
4
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
7 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Faust to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
8 Motion carried unanimously.
9 Respectfully submitted,
to Sue Selseth
11 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
12
13 Mayor
14 ATTEST:
15 City Clerk
z
y
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
3 AUGUST 24, 1999
4 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
5 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor
6 Ranallo.
7 II. ROLL CALL.
8 Councilmembers present: Mayor Ranallo, Cavanaugh, Marks, Faust and Thuesen
9 Councilmembers absent: None
10 Also present: City Manager Mike Morrison; City Attorney William Soth
11 III. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 24, 1999 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
12 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen to approve the August 24, 1999 Regular City Council
13 Meeting Agenda with the following additions and changes:
14 IX. Unfinished Business.
15 A. Resolution 99-051, re: Acquisition of 2700, 2704, and 2709 Pahl Avenue
16 B. Purchase of 2713 Pahl Avenue
17 C. Resolution 99-052, re: Approval of consulting firm for acquisition of 2700, 2704,
18 and 2709 Pahl Avenue
19 D. Resolution 99-056 approving the purchase of properties known as 2700 and 2704
20 Pahl Avenue
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22 IV. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 10, 1999 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES.
23 Motion by Marks, second by Faust, to approve the August 10, 1999 Regular City Council Meet-
24 ing Minutes with the following addition:
25 II. Roll Call. Councilmember Marks served as Mayor Pro Tem.
26 Motion carried unanimously.
27 V. LICENSES/PERMITS/PETITIONS.
28 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Faust to approve the following permit:
29 Temporary 3.2 Beer& Wine Permit:
30 St. Charles Borromeo Fall Cookout/ September 17, 1999/5:00 p.m. to Midnight
31 Voting on the motion: Ranallo, Cavanaugh, Faust, and Thuesen voted aye.. Marks voted nay.
32 The motion carried.
F t
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 2
1 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
2 Motion by Marks, second by Cavanaugh to approve the following claims A-E:.
3 A. Storm Water Analysis/Flooding Issues:
4 1. WSB & Associates, Inc. in the amount of-
5 a. $1,103.00 for professional services regarding 1999 Flood Proofing Grant
6 Program from July 1, 1999 through July 31, 1999.
7 b. $3,742.75 for professional services regarding Harding Street Stormwater
8 Basin Preliminary Design from July 1, 1999 through July 31, 1999.
9 C. $69.00 for professional services regarding Review of Silver Lane Plans
10 from July 1, 1999 through July 31, 1999.
11 d.- $799.50 for professional services regarding Evaluation of Home Buy-Out
12 Alternatives from July 1, 1999 through July 31, 1999.
13 e. $322.50 for professional services regarding MN/DOT Turnback from July
14 1, 1999 through July 31, 1999.
15 f. $207.00 for professional services regarding DNR& FEMA Grant Admini-
16 stration from July 1, 1999 through July 31, 1999.
17 g. $115.88 for professional services regarding General Matters from July 1,
18 1999 through July 31, 1999.
19 B. Silver Point Park Project:
20 1. WSB & Associates, Inc.:
21 a. $4,162.00 for professional services regarding Silver Point Park and
22 Central Park Storm Water Improvements Construction from July 1, 1999 through
23 July 31, 1999.
24 C. 1999 Street Improvement Project:
25 1. WSB & Associates, Inc.
26 a. $15,761.50 for professional services regarding 1999 Street, Utility, and
27 Stormwater Improvement Construction Services from July 1, 1999 through July
28 31, 1999.
29 D. 2000 Street Improvement Project:
30 1. -WSB & Associates, Inc.
31 a. $655.50 for professional services regarding 2000 Street Reconstruction
32 Feasibility Study from July 1, 1999 through July 31, 1999.
33 E. Two pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
34 Motion carried unanimously.
35 VII. REPORTS.
36 A. Planning Commission.
37 Mayor Ranallo introduced Commissioner Hatch as the representative from the Planning
38 Commission and invited him to speak to the Council.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 3
I 1. Mendota Homes, Inc. for 3621 Old Highway 8; conditional use permit,
2 preliminar,}%plat, final plat, and rear yard setback.
3 Mr. Hatch reviewed the background of the project indicating that in December 1997, a
4 representative from Mendota Homes had presented a request to the Planning Commission
5 to-rezone a vacant property at 3621, Old Highway 8 to complete a multi-family housing
6 project that is on adjacent property in Roseville. Both the cities of St. Anthony and
7 Roseville approved the rezoning.
8 In May of this year, City Staff was informed by Mendota Homes that the scope of the
9 project had changed, and that single-level townhomes were proposed for the site instead.
10 Mr. Hatch stated the project has two issues: (1) a variance is required because the lot
11 coverage.exceeded the maximum of 50%; and(2) the setback for the side yard and the
12 backyard.were not met despite consideration of turning the townhome to a different
13 angle.
14 Mr. Hatch stated that a motion had been made by the Planning Commission regarding
15 this project, and that certain conditions were set forth within the motion. Mr. Hatch.refer-
16 enced the Planning Commission meeting minutes of August 17, 1999.
17 City Attorney William Soth stated that the Planning Commission has treated the property
18 in St. Anthony as a single lot. Technically, the property consists of three lots, so lot cov-
19 erage is 100%on the unit lot; but the other lots provide surrounding area. Mr. Soth fur-
20 they stated the ordinance requires that certain findings be met before a conditional use
21 permit can be granted., These findings are: (1)'the use must not be determined to be det-
22 rimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing in or working in the
23 vicinity; (2) the use must not be detrimental to the values of property in the vicinity; (3)
24 the use will provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience;
25 and (4)the use will contribute to the general welfare.
26
27 City Manager Mike Morrison clarified that this issue is contingent upon City Attorney
28 approval.
29 Cavanaugh expressed concern over the lack of a central document incorporating all of the
30 issues and proposed requirements for the conditional use permit for the Council to review
31 in analyzing this proposal.
32 Marks stated that a motion would incorporate all conditions and said motion would be
33 reflected in the minutes. Ranallo mentioned that the approved items and restrictions
34 would be incorporated into a document, and such document would be signed.
f r
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 4
1 Mr. Soth clarified that all the conditions or restrictions for any conditional use permit
2 need to be stated within the motion. Mr. Soth suggested that the City ensure that the
3 Roseville plat has been filed prior to filing the St. Anthony plat.
4 Mr. Soth stated that he had assumed in his letter dated August 12, 1999 that the building
5 proposed would consist of four units, instead of two. Consequently,the mention of a
6 requirement of 17,000 square feet required should be reduced to 12,000 feet required in
7 light of the two-unit project.
8
9 Cavanaugh questioned the existence of a form developer's agreement or conditional use
10 permit-form that would consolidate all of the conditions or restrictions into one form.
I 1 Cavanaugh inquired if Staff could be directed to draft a resolution setting forth all of the
12 conditions of the proposed conditional use permit. Ranallo stated he planned to follow
13 the findings of the Planning Commission, and the City Attorney's report.
14 Motion by Marks, second by Faust, that the City Council approve the conditional use
15 permit in accordance with findings of City Zoning Ordinance 1665.04 (which findings
16 are as follows: (1)the use is not detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of
17 persons residing in or working in the vicinity; (2)the use is not detrimental to the values
18 of property in the vicinity; (3) the use will provide a service or facility which is in the
19 interest of public convenience; and(4)the use will contribute to the general welfare); and
20 said conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions:
21 1. The land to be subdivided would include two lots in St. Anthony in Hennepin
22 County, and 10 lots in Roseville in Ramsey County.
23 2. The developer would be required to provide a preliminary plat with sewer, water,
24 easements, drainage, and all other information required under Section 1500.2.
25 3. The floor area ratio must be in conformance with the codes pursuant to Section
26 1630.05, Subd. 7.
27 4. The lot coverage must not exceed the maximum of 50%.
28 5. A Declaration of Covenants must be submitted to the City for review in a form
29 required under the Minnesota Common Interest Ownership Act, Minnesota
30 Statutes, Chapter 515B.
31 6. Easements must be provided for utilities and drainage where necessary under Sec-
32 tion 1500.05, Subd: 2.
33 7. The City must be provided information regarding the title to the property in the
34 form of a Commitment for Title Insurance or Title Insurance Policy.
35 8. The City must be reimbursed for any expenses incurred in relation to this project.
36 9. Emergency egress and ingress must be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief.
37 10. The City would recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat submitted at the
38 Planning Commission's August 17, 1999 meeting.
1
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 5
1 11. Approval by the City is contingent upon the approval and recording of the
2 . Roseville/Ramsey County plat.
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4 Mr. Soth verified that the conditional use permit has been approved, and now the issues at
5 hand were the preliminary and final plat approval, and the variance request.
6 Ranallo introduced John Mathern, a representative from Mendota Homes and invited him
7 to address the Council. Mr. Mathern stated he was requesting approval from the City of
8 the final plat of the property. Mr. Mathern clarified for the Council that the preliminary
9 plat and the final.plat were the same document.
10 Motion by Marks, second by Faust, to approve the preliminary and final plat subject to
1'1 the review and approval by the City Attorney of all the conditions relating thereto.
12 Motion carried unanimously.
13 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen, that the City approve the variance requested and
14 required by Mendota Homes which consists of a rear-yard setback variance of 20 feet,
15 and a side-yard setback variance of 12 feet, due to the following circumstances:
16 1. The odd shape of the lot in question.
17 2. The setback from County Road 88.
18 3.' The maintenance of order between both cities and counties.
19 4. The character of the lot could be changed since the property is somewhat aban-
20 doned and in disrepair.
21 5. That it would be a detriment to develop a project in St. Anthony that is aestheti-
22 cally different from a project in Roseville.
23 Motion carried unanimously.
24 2. Jim Furseth; for 25.50 Highway 88; conditional use permit.
25 Mr. Hatch reviewed for the Council that Mr. Jim Furseth is the new owner of the former
26 Town'and Country site. Mr. Furseth had filed applications for a conditional use permit
27 for a recreational vehicle business at that site. The conditional use permit is required
28 because the business would include service and repair of recreational vehicles and
29 motorcycle sales. Mr. Hatch clarified that the Council is facing two issues: (1)the
30 conditional use permit due to the business of service and repair of recreational vehicles;
31 and (2) a proposed comprehensive sign package for the business.
t
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 6
1 Mr. Hatch stated that the residents that attended the Planning Commission meeting on
2 August 14, 1999 were concerned with the visual impact of a dumpster to be,located at the
3 rear of the building, and with potential noise levels.
4 Mr. Hatch stated that the Planning Commission had approved the conditional use permit,
5 with restrictions, at the August 17, 1999 meeting.
6 Mr. Roth felt that all of the recommended conditions were referenced in the motion
7 passed by.the Planning Commission, except for the running of engines outside of the
8 building. For example, testing ATV's, snowmobiles;jet skis or motorcycles.
9 Ranallo introduced Mr. James Kellison of Kellison Co. and invited him to address the
10 Council. Mr. Kellison stated that he represents Mr. Furseth, owner of The Hitching Post.
11 Mr. Kellison depicted a drawing of the.prospective building upon completion. Mr.
12 Kellison clarified that the business would not have a test area, test pattern, or test track
13 outside of the building. The business would be using a "running room," where various
f vehicles can be run inside the building. Mr. Kellison asked the Council to keep
14 types o g p
15 in mind that motorcycles do not constitute a majority of the business' sales or service.
16 Mr. Kellison stated that the building will be equipped with tailpipe exhaust so the doors
17 can be closed and additional insulation will be installed which will reduce sound levels.
18
19 Mr. Kellison clarified that any test driving of motorcycles will be conducted on Highway
20 88, and snowmobiles and jet skis would not be test driven. If problems were to occur
21 regarding test driving of vehicles, Mr. Kellison reminded the Council that the State of
22 Minnesota has statutes that can be enforced.
23
24 Mr. Kellison stated that the proposed hours of operation for the business were calculated
25 prematurely. He wished to request a change in the service hours to 7:30 a.m. - 7:30 p.m.,
26 retaining the retail business hours of 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
27
28 Mr. Kellison mentioned that the St. Anthony Shopping Center would be undergoing
29 significant modifications in the near future, However, Mr. Furseth needs to begin
30 construction on The Hitching Post in September, and the City has not been able to
31 provide Mr. Furseth with projections that he would be required to follow to comply with
32 the modifications of the Shopping Center. In short, Mr. Kellison stated that The Hitching
33 Post is conducive to complying with the Planning Commission's conditions in the motion
34 from the August 17,'1999 meeting, except for landscaping, paving, and lighting. Mr.
35 Kellison stated that Mr. Furseth would be willing to sign a developer's agreement to
36 stipulate certain issues regarding landscaping, lighting, and paving.
37 Faust questioned how the test tracks would operate for jet skis or motorcycles.
t 1
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 7
1 In response, Ranallo introduced Mr. Jim Furseth, owner of The Hitching Post, and invited
2 him to address the Council. Mr. Furseth stated that there will be a running room inside
3 the building,but not a test track. Mr. Furseth further stated that jet skis would be tested
4 on a nearby public lake.
5 Cavanaugh mentioned that he had visited the other stores of The Hitching Post and was
6 impressed with the appeal of the Hopkins store. He questioned if the business would be
7 open on Sunday and if Mr. Furseth planned on having outside display areas for vehicles.
8
9 In response, Mr. Furseth stated that sales of motor vehicles are illegal on Sundays, but he
10 was experimenting with the idea of the business being open on Sunday for display pur-
1 1 poses only. Also, Mr. Furseth anticipated a small amount of outside display, if any, and
12 preferred inside displays.
13 Cavanaugh stated he would recommend imposing a conditional use on outdoor displays
14 or experimenting with limited outdoor display that would be brought inside at night.
15 Cavanaugh was concerned about the type of mufflers that would be installed on the
16 motorcycles that Mr. Furseth would be selling. He stated that his vision for the commu-.
17 nity in the future was to ensure that motorcycles comply with noise decibel levels. Mr.
18 Furseth stated that the motorcycles that his business sells are equipped with the manufac-
19 turer's standards for quieter mufflers.
20 Thuesen referenced Mr. Kellison's August 18, 1999 letter and expressed his concern
21 about The Hitching Post keeping in character with the City's vision of the proposed shop-
22 ping center improvements. Mr. Kellison clarified that since significant improvements
23 have been planned for the existing Town and Country building, the project could easily
24 become over budgeted. Mr. Kellison had a concern that the City would impose new or
25 additional requirements to The Hitching Post once the plans for the St. Anthony
26 Shopping Center are finalized.
27 Thuesen agreed that it is a difficult situation, but hoped that Mr. Kellison and Mr. Furseth
28 would be conducive to working with the City's vision for the property. Thuesen felt that
29 The Hitching Post has the potential to add an attractive mix to the shopping center.
30
31 Ranallo clarified with Mr. Kellison that the building is not being torn down,but
32 renovated and rejuvenated.
33 Faust asked why Mr. Furseth had chosen the former Town and Country site for the
34 prospective new business.
.J
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 8
1 Mr. Furseth said that location was the key factor. He explained that motor sports sales
2 are destination businesses with.a.need for major freeway access. Faust clarified that Mr.
3 Furseth's business will be more of a regional draw as opposed to a local draw.
4 Ranallo asked Mr. Soth if a condition could be imposed that would restrict outdoor dis-
5 play pads to no more than six. Mr. Furseth volunteered that eight pads would-be a more
6 comfortable restriction.
7 Mr. Kellison revealed that the sidewalk that currently is flush with the building will be
8 removed and placed farther to the north. Landscaping pockets will be incorporated next
9 to the building with green space close by and a substantial planter area.
10 Faust felt the project was too open ended because the City does not have a final plan for
11 revitalizing the St. Anthony Shopping Center and could not determine the resulting finan-
12 cial impact for The Hitching Post.
13
14 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen, that the City Council approve the conditional use
15 permit pursuant to findings in City Zoning Ordinance 1665.04, and with the following
16 restrictions:
17 1. All vehicles, merchandise, and parts storage should occur in the building. Outside
18 storage would not be allowed.
19 2. An eight-foot high screen wall would be placed at the south side of the building
20 pursuant to Mr. Kellison's projections to screen the bin from the adjacent prop-
21 erty.
22 3. The mechanical equipment on top of the building shall be painted in a'color to
23 blend the equipment with the building.
24 4. The building should conform to the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project Area
25 Design guidelines including building facade, signs, lighting, screening,
26 landscaping, plant material, pedestrian amenities (such as paving, benches, trash
27 containers and bike racks).
28 5. An executed Developer's Agreement shall be presented prior to the City issuing a
29 Certificate of Occupancy.
30 6. Hours of operation for The Hitching Post shall be 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. for busi-
31 ness hours, and 7:30 a.m. - 7:30 p.m. for service hours.
32 7. There shall not be any test drives allowed on the property.
33 8. The perimeter between this land and the residential land uses to the west should
34 be landscaped with overstory trees.
35 9. Part of the pedestrian greenway should be provided in the back part of the 1'ot and
36 in conjunction with the other shopping area to the proposed village green near
37 Highway 88.
38 10. The parking lot should be resurfaced.
39 11. A stipulation that there can be no more than eight vehicles displayed outside.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 9
1
2 Voting on the motion: Ranallo, Cavanaugh, Marks, Thuesen vote aye. Faust voted nay.
3 The motion.carried.
4
5 Mr. Hatch reviewed the request fora comprehensive sign package for The Hitching Post
6 noting that the Planning Commission had approved a signage package with restrictions.
7 Cavanaugh was dismayed at how easily a signage package had been approved. He was
8 concerned that it would encourage other businesses to request exceptions to the City's
9 Ordinance on signage. Cavanaugh asked for clarification on the difference between the
10 City's Ordinance and the sign package that was presented.
11 _Mr. Kellison stated that City Ordinance allows for 150 square feet of signage, and The
12 Hitching Post is requesting approval for 180 feet of signage on the east side, and 172 feet
13 on the north side of the building. In summary, the project is a total of 42 square feet in
14 excess of the allowable amount. He stated that the Ordinance allows for a 15% coverage
15 of the wall area, or two square feet for each lineal foot of wall space, but a total of 150
16 square feet of signage is still the maximum. The proposal included five signs with meas-
17 urements of 3'x12'.
18 Mr. Kellison reviewed for the Council that Mr. Furseth has a marketing agreement with
19 manufacturers that requires particular signage. According to the City Ordinance, a busi-
20 ness could cover up to 50% of the window area with signage. Mr. Kellison stated that if
21 the Council recommended against the comprehensive sign plan.allowing for excess
22 signage on the walls of the business,then The Hitching Post would need to place signs on
23 the windows. Mr. Kellison felt that would cause the business to lose curb appeal. Mr.
24 Kellison clarified that the City is being asked to approve the comprehensive sign package
25 in lieu of The Hitching Post placing signs in the windows.
26 Ranallo inquired about the square footage of the window area. Mr. Kellison stated the
27 windows are 12 feet wide by 8 feet high. Ranallo stated it has been an issue before
28 whether only the letters of the sign are measured or the entire sign for compliance with
29 the Ordinance.
30 Faust shed some light on the history of the sign ordinance. He stated that seven or eight
31 years ago, the Ordinance was rewritten. The specifications in the Ordinance were set
32 forth by a collective group, and he feels that many cities are able to require smaller signs
33 regardless of the franchise. Faust cautioned the Council that St. Anthony, as a commu-
34 nity, has always felt set apart from other suburbs in that it was important to keep signage
35 appropriate, dignified, and consistent throughout the community. Faust clarified he did
36 not plan to vote for the sign package.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 10
1 Marks said the City has established a reputation for relatively small signs. He would
2 favor a lower amount of signage and maintaining signage within the Ordinance.
3 Ranallo stated that he was impressed that the proposed comprehensive sign plan specified
4 that there would not be any signs on the windows. He reminded the Council that if it is
5 insistent on keeping the signage appropriate with the square footage, then the business
6 could place signs on the windows. Ranallo said he would vote for the comprehensive
7 sign package with the understanding that there would not be any signs placed on the
8 windows of the business.
9 Thuesen felt that the project had potential merit; however, he agreed with Faust that if the
10 comprehensive sign package was approved, a Pandora's Box could be opened with other
11 businesses requesting an exception to the sign ordinance.
12 Mornson said the application for the comprehensive sign package is allowed under the
13 Ordinance. Mornson read the Ordinance and stated this has been done in the past.
14 Mornson clarified for the Council that the compromise for approving the comprehensive
15 sign plan submitted is the City would allow The Hitching Post to exceed the allowable
16 square footage for signage, and in return The Hitching Post would not implement any
17 window signage.
18 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Marks, that the City Council approve the comprehen-
19 sive sign package submitted by Kellison Co. and Jim Furseth for The Hitching Post, and
20 approved by the Planning Commission, with the understanding that:
21 1. The north side of the building would comply at 150 square feet;
22 2. The east side would comply at 180 square feet; and
23 3. The monument sign would comply with City Ordinances regarding the planting of
24 flowers and bushes.
25 4. That the business not implement any window signage.
26
27 Voting on the motion: Ranallo, Cavanaugh, Marks, Thuesen voted aye. Faust voted nay.
28 The motion carried.
29
30 Ranallo thanked Mr. Kellison and Mr. Furseth for addressing the Council.
31 B. Councilmembers.
32 Cavanaugh stated that he had recently visited Western Wisconsin and was impressed with the
33 area.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 11
1 Marks spoke about the Sister City Organization and the exchange program the organization had
2 this year with Salo, Finland. Marks stated that he received a fax recently that indicated the
3 organization plans on proceeding with an exchange for next year and it appears that the exchange
4 will take place.
5 Faust said on August 12, 1999,he attended a League of Minnesota Cities meeting, fiscal future
6 policy committee, and a citizens jury was put together on property taxes by the Governor. The
7 most telling observation Faust noted was that most people view this process as quite
8 complicated, when the intent is that simplicity is the number one issue for property taxes. When
9 both sides were heard, it was found that simplicity slid down to an issue of fairness. Fairness
10 was the watch word.
11 Faust stated that Ron Abrams, chairman of the tax committee, spoke and gave some insights on
12 that process and Faust believes there could be some ways to have an open ear in this direction.
13 Mr. Abrams was against acquisition, which is the process of selling a home and taxes remaining
14 the same. Faust felt the meeting was informative because some ideas were thought of that could
15 be introduced at the next legislative session.
16 C. Ma oor.
17 Ranallo mentioned that he had become aware that when the City serves official notices to resi-
18 dents in condominiums or apartments, that the notices go to an association or similar department
19 first, as opposed to directly to the resident. Ranallo asked the City Manager to investigate the
20 guidelines surrounding service of notices and to determine the possibility of serving official
21 notices directly to the residents.
22 Ranallo realized the many residents were aware of the publicity surrounding the rabbits found in
23 St. Anthony. Ranallo and Mr. Soth had a meeting with the Hennepin County Health Department
24 and the owners of the home. Mr. Soth explained that the rabbits have been removed to the
25 Hennepin County Humane Society and the owners of the home in question have undertaken a
26 clean-up of the property. He stated that the County Health Department is involved in the matter
27 and has it under investigation and advisement.
28 D. City Manager.
29 Momson referred to a handout from the League of Minnesota Cities regarding the "tax rate
30 increase authorization" law. The handout clarified that the new law applies to cities over a popu-
31 lation of 500, and requires passage of a council resolution to authorize a property tax rate
32 increase. The law states that the resolution must be passed after holding a public hearing on the
33 issue, and the hearing can be held at a regularly-scheduled council meeting. There is no restric-
34 tion in the law on the date of the hearing or the timing for passing the resolution, but any time
35 before October 20 is acceptable. Many cities plan to pass the resolution concurrent with the
36 adoption of their preliminary levy.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 12
t
Morrison suggested that the tax rate hearing resolution be held on September 14, 1999, which is
2 the same night-that the Council will adopt the preliminary levy.
3 Cavanaugh suggested that the hearing be held on the tax rate and then proceed with the levy
4 resolution.
5 Ranallo clarified that the.truth-in-taxation hearing would still be held in December.
6
7 Morrison stated the specific date for a truth-in-taxation hearing would be discussed at the
8 September 7, 1999 Council worksession.
9 Morrison stated that a letter had been received from a Minneapolis councilmember regarding
10 potential problems at Sroga's, a local business. City Staff has set a meeting with Minneapolis
11 officials and Sroga's to discuss the operation of that business.
12 Morrison stated a meeting had been held with the Rice Creek Watershed District as well as resi-
13 dents of the Silver Lake Homeowners Association to address some water-related issues in regard
14 to the Apache drainage issue. There was some concern that the runoff around the Freedom Gas
15 Station was not working to full capacity, and that one-third of the.runoff that should be going to
16 the ponds was potentially'going on Silver Lake Road. Conclusion of the meeting was that the
17 Rice Creek Staff was directed to send a letter to the developer requesting that this issue be
18 corrected.
19 Cavanaugh felt that the catch basins should be redesigned.
20 Morrison stated that he had been requested by Cavanaugh to determine the flow of runoff for St.
21 Charles. Morrison plans a meeting in September with St. Charles.
22 Morrison offered that the League of Cities holds regional meetings throughout the state to update
23 on various issues. The meeting held in the metropolitan area will be on September 16, 1999 at
24 the New Brighton Family Center. Morrison had provided a copy of the agenda for the
25 Councilmembers.
26 Cavanaugh mentioned that the Planning Commission meeting minutes from August 17, 1999
27 reflected that the movie theater proposal had fallen through. Morrison clarified that there were
28 two developers that had proposed movie theaters. One developer withdrew this past month, and
29 the other group is still interested. Cavanaugh suggested a moratorium for Apache and wished to
30 discuss that possibility at the next Council work session.
31
32 Ranallo asked Mr. Soth to review the prospect of placing a moratorium on Apache.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 13
1 Cavanaugh mentioned the prior suggestion of having the Parks Commission and Planning
2 Commission meetings televised on cable. He wished to impress upon the Commissions the
3 opportunity it would present to the community to have the meetings televised, and also that the
4 City has budgeted funds specifically for televising meetings.
5 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS — None.
6 IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
7 A. Resolution 99-051 re: Acquisition of 2700, 2704, and 2709 Pahl Avenue.
8 Resolution 99-051 was withdrawn.
9 B. Purchase of 2713 Pahl Avenue.
10 Ranallo introduced Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Inc., and invited him to address the
11 Council. Mr. Hubmer stated that he had held discussions with the residents at 2709 Pahl
12 Avenue. This meeting was intended to discuss options and to discuss the resident's acceptance or
13 interest in pursuing any of the options presented. Mr. Hubmer had also contacted the residents at
14 2800 St. Anthony Boulevard, 2701 Pahl Avenue, 2705 Pahl Avenue, 2713 Pahl Avenue, and
15 2709 Pahl Avenue. Mr. Hubmer referenced his letter of August 24, 1999,,which set forth the
16 latest results of the discussions, and said letter was reviewed for the Council.
17 Ranallo reviewed for the residents that the City had asked WSB & Associates and Mr. Hubmer
18 to review all possible options and the letter of August 24, 1999 provides the results of that
19 review.
20 Faust questioned whether the residents at 2713 Pahl Avenue were willing sellers as set forth in
21 Option VII. of the August 24, 1999 letter. Mr. Hubmer verified that the residents were willing
22 sellers and clarified that he had spoken with the homeowners.
23 Ranallo explained that the City had tried not to dislocate anyone from his or her home, but that
24 the City's intent was to provide a 100-year flood protection program. He stated that as long as
25 the residents were willing sellers, he was comfortable with the decisions.
26 Mr. Hubmer said the City would have some flexibility regarding any,purchases. Faust asked Mr.
27 Hubmer for a timeline in which the City needed to act. Mr. Hubmer felt that it would be benefi-
28 cial if the three properties could be coordinated together, with demolition beginning in February
29 or March, and planting of trees and grass completed by spring.
30 Ranallo asked Mornson if there was a willing seller for 2700 and 2704. Mornson stated that the
31 price was reduced from the last negotiation and the preferred closing date would be in October or
32 November. Ranallo asked Mr. Soth if the property at 2713 Pahl could be purchased by the City
33 with the stipulation that the residents can stay in the home until January or February. Mr. Soth
34 said his recommendation would be for the City to sign a purchase agreement with the stipulation
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 14
1 that closing would not occur until the earlier of the date the residents close on another house, or a
2 certain specific outside date.
3 Mr. Steve Mariosek, 2605 Pahl Avenue NE, questioned whether fencing would be.installed
4 around the holding ponds. Mr. Hubmer stated there currently are no fencing plans for the storm-
5 water holding areas because fencing would prevent the flow of water and accumulate debris.
6 Motion by Faust, second by Marks, that the City direct WSB & Associates, Inc. and Staff to
7 initiate a purchase agreement within 30 days for the property at 2713 Pahl Avenue and that the
8 residents have not later than February 1, 2000 or sooner to vacate the property upon finding
9 suitable quarters. Staff must return to the Council within 30 days, or sooner, with the executed
10 purchase agreement.
11 Motion carried unanimously.
12 Faust remarked that this is a win-win situation for everyone and that the goal of 100-year flood
13 protection would not be compromised. Faust warmly thanked the family for selling their
14 property and expressed sincere appreciation to Mr. Hubmer for his dedication and commitment
15 in following this project.
16 Marks reviewed the background of 100-year flood protection. He said a study was done and
17 some of the.plans are complete or underway. Marks mentioned this because he had become
18 aware of concerns from residents that believed the City did not have an overall plan for resolving
19 the flooding issue.
20 Cavanaugh stated he had spoken with one of the residents that were concerned about the overall
21 flood protection plan. Cavanaugh suggested that a copy of the plan should be sent to that resi-
22 dent. Mr. Hubmer stated that the area of concern is 32"d Avenue, Wilson, Edward and Belden.
23 Ranallo expressed sincere appreciation and warmly thanked the residents of 2713 Pahl Avenue
24 for coming forward.
25 C. Resolution 99-052 re: Approval of consulting firm for acquisition of 2700, 2704, and
26 2709 Pahl Avenue.
27 Resolution 99-052 was withdrawn.
28 D. Resolution 99-056 re: Approval of the Purchase of 2700 Pahl Avenue and 2704 Pahl
29 Avenue.
30 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Marks, to approve Resolution 99-056 which authorizes the
31 City of St. Anthony and the City Council to purchase the properties known as 2700 Pahl Avenue
32 for $139,000 plus assessments, and 2704 Pahl Avenue for$155,000 plus assessments.
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 24, 1999
Page 15
1 Motion carried unanimously.
2 X. NEW BUSINESS.
3 A. Resolution 99-055, re: City's purchase of 2809 - 30`h Avenue NE.
4 Mr. Soth recommended two changes to the Purchase Agreement for the property at 2809 301
5 Avenue NE:
6 1. Allowing the owner to stay on the property two (2) weeks after closing creates risks and
7 potential problems for the City. Mr. Soth recommends that "two weeks" should be
8 replaced with "date of closing."
9 2. Two items on the Addendum to Purchase agreement should be initialed and deleted:
10 (a) Purchaser is to provide Seller with a letter of intent. The Seller has received said
11 letter of intent.
12 (b) The agreement was subject to Seller acquiring a home of choice. Seller has found a
13 home of choice.
14 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen, to approve Resolution 99-055 authorizing the City's pur-
15 chase of 2809 - 30'Avenue NE, with the modifications to the Purchase Agreement and
16 Addendum as per the City Attorney,for a price of$106,000.00.
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
19 Motion by Marks, second by Faust, to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 Respectfully submitted,
22 Sue Selseth
23 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
24
25 Mayor
26 ATTEST:
27 City Clerk