HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 04271982 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
100468
Box: 16
Folder: CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
Document: CC PACKET 04221982
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
COUNCIL AGENDA
April 27, 1982
7 : 30 P.M.
r A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
C. Approval of April 13, 1982 Council Minutes . f
D. Licenses/Permits/Petitions
1. Sroga Service Station License _
ACTION: Council
E. Presentation of Claims
1. Dorsey Law Firm $2, 145. 25
ACTION: Recommend Approval.O
Req-uested Public Appearance-Bernard Preu$sf n r__: _
F. Reports
1. Council
a. Mayor Sundland
b. Councilman Enrobth
C . Councilman Letourneau
d. Councilman Marks
e. Councilman Ranallo
• 2 . Commissions/Departments/Committees
a. March Finance Report
b. Police Department Monthly Report-March , 1982
C. Chemical Abuse Information Committee minutes-April 13, 1982
Planning Commission minutes-April 20 , 1982
e. Slide Show-Ramsey County Environmental Health "Landfill Alternat-
ives" .
3. City Manager
a. Commissioner Salverda Schedule
b. Surface Water Management Plan-AMM information.
C. Minutes of Staff Meeting, April 21 , 1982
G. Public Hearings-None
H. Unfinished Business
1 . Ordinance 1982-004-Water Rate Increase
2 . Ordinance 1982-003-Fence Ordinance
3. Craig Morris-Letter of Credit
4 . Senior Citizens Highrise Proposal
5 . Skating Rink Study Committee
I . New Business
1. Purchase Request-Municipal Liquor Store
2 . Change Order-Well #4 Repair
. 3. Tanner!Salons as a Conditional Use Permit
J. Adjournment
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
COUNCIL MINUTES
• April 13 , 1982
Mayor Sundland opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance at
7 : 30 P.M.
Present for roll call : Marks , Ranallo, Sundland, Letourneau, and
Enrooth.
Also present: Dave Childs , City . Manager; William Soth, City Attorney;
Carol Johnson, Finance Director; and Lee Entner,
Fire Chief.
The following were changes made in the minutes for the March 23rd
Council meeting:
Page 1 , para. 10 : Substitute "25" for "24" in the last line.
Page 2 , para. 3 Amend the report of the Mayor's recollection to
reflect that "the pathway planning committee did
not think the abutting property owners would be
willing to assume the responsibility for snow
removal from the walkways" .
Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Marks to
approve as amended the minutes for the Council meeting held March 23 , 1982 .
• Motion carried unanimously .
Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to
approve as submitted the minutes for the Council work session held
April 5 , 1982 .
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau
to grant a temporary beer permit to Carl Branger, 3604 33rd Avenue N.E. ,
for the Village Originals picnic to be held in Central Park from
2 :00 P.M. to 8 :00 P.M. , September 11 , 1982 .
Voting on the motion:
Aye : Ranallo, Letourneau, Sundland, and Enrooth.
Nay : Marks .
Motion carried.
It was noted that, as requested by Councilman Letourneau, the applicant 's
age had been verified before the beer permit approved March 23rd had
been issued.
Councilman Ranallo reported receiving a number of complaints from
residents who live near the Sroga Standard Station, 3201 Stinson Boulevard,
about the number of trucks and other vehicles which are parked for
long periods outside the fence which was intended to serve as screen
-2-
for such activities . Councilman Enrooth reported one resident had
called him to report a "For Sale" sign on one of these vehicles , wonder-
ing whether the site is being used for "a used car lot" . Mr. Sroga's
• reaction to these complaints has been that the City dug up his property
for the sewer diversion pipes and he can' t use the screened in area
until the frost is out of the ground and the gravel can be replaced
by the City crews . Mr. Soth commented he believes "it would be
reasonable for the City to inquire about the failure to comply with
parking agreements for this site but the City ' s ability to withhold
the license for the station would depend upon- the requirement for
fencing" .
.Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to table
the service station license for the Sroga Standard Station on Stinson
until the next Council meeting to which Mr. Sroga and his neighbors
will be invited to air their differences regarding the station ' s
appearance.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to grant
a vending license to St. Anthony Self Serve Laundry and a bench license
to U.S. Bench Corporation.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Marks to
approve payment of all verified claims submitted March 31st and April
13th, included with the April 13th, 1982 Council agenda.
• Motion carried unanimously.
The Mayor urged that the City 's concerns related to the surface water
management legislation which recently passed be presented at the public
hearing scheduled by the Metropolitan Council April 29th and Mr. Childs
will prepare a listing of the City' s and the AMM' s questions about
the new state agency for Council consideration at their next meeting.
Councilman Marks indicated he perceives there is a great concern
on the part of many people that the Metropolitan Council is over-
stepping its authority as an advisory body to the State Legislature
and, in some instances , appears to be a legislative entity on its
own, a problem he anticipates will be addressed by the legislative
committee which has been established to oversee the Metropolitan
Council' s activities .
The Mayor noted the League of Minnesota Cities is requesting nomina-
toins to their Board of Directors and reported the Metropolitan
Transit Commission has notified him that, although they will be con-
structing bus shelters at the 29th and 39th Avenues N.E. intersections
with Silver Lake Road this year, because of budget restrictions , they
will defer the shelter construction planned for 33rd and Stinson
Boulevard for at least a year.
The joint meeting of the Council and Community Service Advisory Board
• members this year will be a barbecue held in the inner court of the
Parkview building, weather permitting , according to Councilman Enrooth .
Friday , May 28th was the date preferred by the Council for the event
with any other date in that same week acceptable , except the 25th which
-3-
is the date of the Council meeting prior to which the Board of Review
will be conducted by the Council.
Several calls from residents annoyed by what they perceive to be an
increase in commercial air traffic over St. Anthony were reported by
Mayor Sundland who' said one man said he was unable to get a satis-
factory explanation from the Airport Commission representative he
contacted. The Mayor ' s questions related .to whether or not air traffic
has been rerouted over the City and whether the normal traffic
patterns have been affected by the loss of air controllers will be
presented to the appropriate air officials in a letter to be written
by staff over the Mayor' s signature.
Councilman Marks recommended the various department heads be invited
to attend future Council meetings as a means of letting them know the
Council is quite aware of the difficulties they are experiencing with
the drastic budget cuts which have been necessary . Councilman Ranallo
suggested a better perspective could probably be achieved if these
discussions were held at work sessions , as with the Liquor Operations
Manager and the Public Works Director, where frank and open discussions
were possible: Mayor Sundland said he has been having lunch with
these administrators to let them know the City can ' t afford to lose
good, trained people , and cuts in personnel will be among the last
to be made for budget reasons .
So many calls have been made regarding dogs running loose in the City ,
Councilman Ranallo reported he drove around in a four mile radius of
his home one Sunday afternoon and counted at least 20 dogs unleashed
in that area. He wondered if it would be cost effective to have MAPSI
patrol at least one weekend but Councilman Letourneau commented he
has observed the animal patrol trucks are not easily recognized and
said he believes the City' s practice of notifying the owners of
complaints against their animals would be more productive. Mr. Childs
reported residents will be reminded of the existing animal control
ordinances in the next Newsletter.
The State Clerk ' s Conference report by Carol Johnson; Ron Berg 's
Cable T.V. update; Police report for February; Fire Department Report
for March; and the liquor operations sales summary for March were
discussed and accepted as informational.
Councilman Letourneau reported the North Suburban Cable T.V. franchise
was awarded to Teleprompter Westinghouse April lst and state approval
is anticipated within five months . He said Teleprompter has promised
service will be offered to all ten communities no later than eighteen
months from now contingent upon adoption of the necessary ordinances
by each city. The Mayor then told Jim Schwartz of the Bulletin he
found his article -on the franchise award to be most informative.
It was the general consensus that all conditions for branch pick up
listed in the April 7th staff notes should be listed in the next
Newsletter with emphasis placed on the fact that no return collections
will be made. Although Mr. Childs confirmed it costs the City
• $38 per stop to make these collections , the Mayor and Councilman
Enrooth believe the tradition should be continued since most residents
view this service as a worthwhile expense.
-4-
As he introduced the new firefighter, Don Drusch, to the Council,
Chief Entner told them how Mr. Drusch ' s expertise as a paramedic has
already proved a benefit to the department and invited the Council and
• their families to join the other City employees in CPR training
sessions which have now been set up. A new Resusci-Annie is being
donated for these classes by the St. Anthony Kiwanis Club, according
to Mayor Sundland.
There was Council agreement with Mr. Child ' s conclusions that the
City is not prepared to participate in the demonstration of curbside
collection of recyclable materials at this time , especially since
resident participation in the City ' s own recycling program has been
minimal and paper products are effectively recycled through the various
paper drives conducted in the City .
Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to
plan for provision of a fire hydrant mid-block on Silver Lake Road
between Silver Lane and 39th Avenue N.E. , as recommended by the Public
Works Director in his April 13 , 1982 memorandum.
Motion carried unanimously .
The Manager reported that, when the City siren malfunctioned during
the first test this season, it was determined a new motor would be
needed and estimated the cost of repairs will probably run about
$2 ,000 . He then reiterated his recommendation that the 1982 City
budget be modified to reflect the $23 , 000 cut he anticipates will be
necessary , based on current revenue projections , to balance the budget
• and added that a public hearing is required to approve the necessary
Revenue Sharing funds transfer.
Motion by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Councilman Letourneau
to schedule a public hearing on the proposed Revenue Sharing budget
amendment for 7 : 45 P.M. , May 11, 1982 .
Motion carried unanimously .
Referring to Mr. Hamer' s report that it costs the City $38 , 470 . 69 to
maintain its skating rinks , as well as the Public Works Director's
suggestions for cutting back on these expenses in the face of declining
use of the rinks the past few years , Mr. Childs recommended a committee
be formed to study the future ice skating needs and services for the
City. The Mayor suggested Ron Hanson, who had indicated an interest
in the future of hockey programs in the City , . should be contacted
regarding membership on the committee.
Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to
authorize the establishment of a five person committee to be selected
by the Manager to determine future allocation of resources for ice
skating within the context of budget cuts for all City programs .
Motion carried unanimously.
• Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to
schedule the acceptance of proposals on the City ' s insurance program
for 10 : 00 A.M. , Monday , May 10 , 1982 in the City Manager's office.
Motion carried unanimously.
-5-
Mr. Childs gave a slide presentation of the graphs illustrating the
decline in water usage for the City over the past years which he
believes justify a water rate increase to slow or stop the water fund
• balance depletion and which would provide regular repairs , maintenance ,
and minor expansion without borrowing. He also illustrated that the
City, even with the 7� per cubic foot increase , would. remain below
virtually all neighboring communities in average rates charged. The
Manager added, that the cost of repairing the pump on Well #4 will
be just below the $10 ,000 estimated by Mr. Hamer who has confirmed
that delaying the repairs would have proved more expensive. Reports
from Mrs . Johnson and Mr. Hamer were included in the discussion .
Motion. by Councilman Ranallo .and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to
approve the first reading of Ordinance 1982-004 .
ORDINANCE 1982-004
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATER RATES;
AMENDING SUBDS . 2 AND 3 OF SECTION 550 :00
OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
ST. ANTHONY
Motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Marks recommended referring the proposed fence ordinance
to the Planning Commission for their recommendations .
Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to table
action on Ordinance 1982-003 until the Council has received the Plan-
ning Commission's reactions to the proposed statute.
ORDINANCE 1982-003
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO FENCES; REQUIRING
BUILDING PERMITS; REGULATING LOCATIONS; PRO-
HIBITING CERTAIN FENCES; AMENDING THE 1973
CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING A SECTION
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to
schedule a public hearing. on the assessment rolls for the Anthony Lane
North improvements during the Council meeting May 11 , 1982 .
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Mayor Sundland and seconded by Councilman Marks to adjourn
the meeting at 8 : 45 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted ,
Helen Crowe , Secretary
•
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
FEE STATEMENT
131144
:. April 7 19 82
• Mr. David Childs
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 ,.
IN ACCOUNT WITH
DORSEY, WINDHORST, HANNAFORD, WHITNEY & HALLADAY
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(INTERNAL REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. 41-0223337)
IN RE: City of St. Anthony
(A separate Disbursement Statement is or will be rendered for our disbursements, if any, for your account.)
To legal services rendered from January 1, 1982
through January 31, 1982 Amount
Pro secutions-----------------------------------------------$1, 200 . 00
• Attendance at City Council Meeting on 1/5/82-------------$ 90 . 00
Attendance at City Council Meeting on 1/26/82------------$ 240 .00
Shamrock Drive Lot Division--------------------------------$ 90 .00
General
Review of agenda matters and general preparation for
meetings, including necessary research and review of
documents, correspondence and telephone calls, and
including advice to manager and staff with respect to
subdivision without platting, fence ordinance, dispute
with Rice Creek Watershed District, shopping center
signs and auctions in commercial district-------- 480 .00
Total Fees $2,100 .00
Plus disbursements
per attached $ 45 .25
Total $2 ,145.25
WRS: jj
Payment due within 10 days of receipt of statement.
Disbursements made for your account,for which bills have not yet been received will appear on a later statement.
'0000V
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
---.-----------------------------------------------
Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
• Resolution
April 20, 1982 Ordinance Reports-2a
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title March Financial
Other
April 27,__1982 Informational Reports
---------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: Carol Johnson, Finance Director
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Attached are the monthly financial _reports
for March, 1982.
• FISCAL IMPACT: Note that 1982 revenue in all funds has been $116,082 and
expenditures are under budget but total $440,909. This negative cash flow situa-
tion will be relieved somewhat by quarterly water and sewer collections but will
not be resolved until the end of June when property tax receipts are received
from the County.
ALTERNATIVES : None, except be glad that an adequate fund balance exists to
alleviate the need for borrowing.
RECOMMENDATION: For your information.
CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
-ti SL" t
PFRCE\T
-, - - - -- - - - Uw.JA10 FXPENDEi, RFi AIhIidG
r.U05ET SPENT THIS ML. SPENT YR TO DATE CRLIGATIONS TD 0Arr FALANCE
-----GENERAL FUND —- - .
MAYC4 CCUNCIL 16, 110:u0 1.')32.56 7,758.34 21.0: 29,011.66
GENERAL MANAGFMENT 69,745,OU 5,333.16 11r691.64 16.76 58.C53.36
- --- CA9LF rELEVISiON 4,8SG.(f0 100.62C1 - -2,-752..-44-- - 56.75 - 2rC97..56 -
ZLECTIC:+S 2,600.00
_. _ .. 2,600.00
FINANCE-INSUR 6 ACCTNG 91,025.00 1.069.31 9,718.19 10.30 81.646.81
— FI-444CE-ASSESSING- -- - 14.434.00 211.83 --- 604:91 3.22 - 17.°33:C9-
LLGAL 3R,JG0.)7 2,623.75 2,623.75 9.37 25,176.25
L.\G�2.-PL4•C.IN•, F. 1CSING 2.31,0.Q0 ) .060.1C 45.30 - 1,27S.SC-- -
CITY H!)ILDIMGS - -y5,775.Oo 6.406.31 23,27tf:P4 21.13 - -- 62,"St.-t6---
CIVIL DFFL_%SE 13,735.Jr) 2,423. 34 4,361.63 11.75 9, 373.37
PCLICE P4CTECTICN ,31,756.00 28,988.30 - -- 92.270.64 2..37 -- -339,483.36
-- - FIRE PRC-TECT-1 E4-- — -- ----- -267,133.W) 15,621.65 17:20- --217oe21:1-2--
-_ - I4SP-.3LD6,PLMU,HTNG,HLTH 11,525.1J0 112.57 1.590.05 11.79 9034.55
ANIMAL CC'JTROL 1 550.00 --- - 67.3C 4.34 - - --- 1.462.70—
257.570.n0 14,883.60 4H.-59-4.-70
14.21 - 208,C.E6:30-
PU;L IL WRK S-S rRELT CAI q 412,51C.,
T it,CP;Y -.(PE:SE - SU"MA Y DATE C'-33;-62
- - ---- - -.. . PERCE>;T
------------ - ---- - - - - , u:1PAt0 Exf-ENUEP - -- - REMAINING
--
BUDGET SPENT THIS.M.C. SPENT YR T.^. 04 T CPLI;4TIC•-NS TC CATE FALANCE
- - -- Pr$ WRKS-OPER--MA I-N-T-)-RfP-P':"----- 7-7-,825 DJ - 3:,295:58--- 25,1 30.11- 32:29
F-tEE 47ID ,•EEC CARE 17,4?5.00 E7E,.00 2,45:.80 14.0; 15.C22.2C
- - - - --
PARKS 11,450.00 633.01 5.52 --- --- 10,816.99
SENFR .. .
- _ -- -- - 136.15
-
wATER 151.71 151.71CR
FUND TOTAL 1,424.562.10 84,114.83 28(1,557.19 19.69 1,144,OC4.81
REVENUE SHAMING FUND---- - ----- - - - - - .. --
REVENUE SHAR I 34,600.DO
- 34,6CO.JC
CND TCi4L 44.600.00
34,tOO.CC
-- C-Cmm 7FVEL 9LK GRANT -FUNC------ ----
BLOCK GtAKT +r9 13.CC 98().2O ti,98C.20CR
FUND TO]AL 5,973.00 -- 5,980.20 5,98C.20CR
-- -CA-IiAL-F;UIPMFNT-FU`1D- - -- — - --- -- --- - - - - — - — -
-..._CAPITAL ECU1PriF:NT 60,700.00 ----- 30.394.2a 50.01 30.3C5.76
`------------------------ 33__33------- -. _
FUND TOTAL 60,700.00 - -- 30.394.24 - - -- - _ - - ----- --------------
50.07 30,3C5.76
I"oRCVFMENF BLINDS - 1973- -------- -- ---'- - ---
6L;NCS - 1973 44.50 44.50 44.5CCR
ST ANIiICNY EXPENSE - SUMMARY -
C:1TE 2-31-02
PERCENT
--tiWAID- -- HtPfN[EO-------- RE-MAlk1-NG-
BUDGET SPENT THIS MO. SPENT YR TO DATE OBLIGATIONS TO DATE eALeNCE
— - - FUND TO T AL ----- - - ---— -- - --44:50-- --a4:5�---- ----- ---,.. ---- ---- - -----.4 4 e50CR-
REVOLVING INPRLVE++F"ITS
ANTHONY LANE 22,285.07 229906.76 22,9G6.76CR
---------- FUND-TOT AC-------------'----- --
- ---------2-2r285�7----�2:90tr-�6----------------------- ------- --22-:9C6�96CR-
SF.ER FUN
SEWER 332,680.00 22,181.23 70,158.70 21.Ob 262,521.3C
-
-- -------FUND-TOTAL-- ---,. ----- ---992rtr80:30 --- -2'2 3---- ifl.-i�i8:7E)--- ---------� -
�--
4ATER FUND
WATER 234,975.00 1,146.60 30.867.52 13.13 204.IC7.48
-----------FUND iOGAL--------------------234x91{:un----7�-14b-:60------30.86-7.-52--------------
L 8---
i;RAVi? TCTAL 2.1197,517.00 140,745.23 440,9C9.11 2L.12 1,646.6G7.E9
i AN :cY <-vFt,1;E - SU'°:.1Y D TE u3-31-52
PFRCE`J
COLLECTED ------COLL-ECTED-- COLLEC-TED,
-
REVENiuE THIS MONTH YR TC DATE TO CATE RALANCE
Ga4ER,L FUND - - - - —--- - - - --- - - - --- -
'RCPERTY TAXES 5J6,2'73.00 596.293.00
LICENSES 8,000.00 1.301.00 6,329.00 74.11
1,h7l.CC
-PrRYI TS -- -------- -- 6. 00:00 -- -- -
- -4.82h.50- -----
PLuwul::' 7f,9.00 295.13, 285.000q
INTFRGOVERNMENFAL REVENUE 339,129.00 389.18 5,258.13 1.55 33'5,870.87
- - FINES, FGRFQI-Ti- E-+EMd6i�-- ----24,070.-QO---- 4r9t5.00 -' - --9,071 rOC- --9-7699-
- --- _. _.. - --t4.9 7-4.
dE VENUES 49,000.00 984.70 2,717.1t1 5.70 46,202.22
v1=1JUF 41H,640.00 45,625.00 91,150.00 21.79 327,390.00 ---_----
FUND TtiT'1LS - ---------1,441,062.00--- - 53.776.49 -- ll6,it4:al - - 8.05 . .. 1 ?24x947.59 -- --
Rc JENUL Sii1''P,G Fw2:)
RrYENUE 5I1-14143 34,600.00 34,6GO.CC
--- - FUND TOTALS-- - --- -- -34T600.00----- ---- .._..._... -- --- --- - ._.. _._... ---- -.. -14,6CC:00----
CAdITAL E::UI?MF'JT FUNC
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 87,700.00 81,7CC.00
T71T 1LS
Iwu RCVI•YPNT ;iCNI1S 1473
ST 4NTHCNr tCVE`1UE - su:, aty CATS Os-31-82
PERCEN'T
-- ------------ - ---- --ANPIL-�PA1'ED- ---GGtLECFEf� -----C-6L-L-EC-TEO---COLLECTED-- - UNCCLLECTEO-- -- -
REVENUE THIS MONTH YR TO DAT.E TO CATE BALANCE
— BONDS- --1973 - --- - --- ---- - ---- -- - --492`i-- ---- -49:25CR --
FUND TOTALS 49.25 49.25CR
------- - - --- --
SERER FUND ----- -
-- --- SERER- - -- - 24-9:460.00- --- - -
FUND VITALS - 289,460.00 289,46C.CC
WATER FUND
485.1-7ER----- 8t:4-1CR-- .03
235,O5fs:4 Z------- -
_- -- FUND TOTALS- - --- —--- - 234,975.00 485.17CU 81.41CR .01 235,056.41
GRAND TOTALS 2,087,797.00 539291.21 -- 5.56 - 1,971.714.75 - - - -
MONTHLY REPORT -- POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTH OF MARCH 19 82
POLICE SERVICE TO PUBLIC
Total number of radio calls - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 446
Number of office phone calls - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 398
Public Assists - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88
Number of details received from other sources
(Phone, Office, Citizen, Letter, Patrol) - - - - - - - - - - 872
NUMBER OF CASES REPORTED FOR MONTH
HOMICIDE DISTURBANCE CALLS 16
SEXUAL ASSAULTS 1 PROWLERS, SUSP. PERSONS & VEH. 35
OTHER SEX OFFENSES 2 JUVENILE RUNAWAYS
ROBBERY ALARM CALLS 23
ASSAULT WARRANT ARRESTS , ETC. 7
BURGLARY - Residence 11 BOOKINGS (Other than Warr. ) 3
Business VEHICLES TOWED 4
LARCENY 29 LIQUOR OFFENSES 3
MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 3 LIQUOR BANK RUNS 46
ARSON ANIMAL BITES
FORGERY 1 OTHER ANIMAL VIOLATIONS 5
FRAUD BREATHALIZER TESTS 5
VANDALISM, D. W. I . ARRESTS 6
WEAPON OFFENSES MEDICAL EMERGENCIES 12
NARCOTICS 2
PUBLIC PEACE
(Disorderly Conduct,etc) 2 TOTAL REPORTS FOR MONTH 591
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MONTH OF MARCH 19 82 ,
TAGS ISSUED BY EACH OFFICER
MOVING NON-MOVING OTHER TRAFFIC OTHER
OFFICER D. W. I. VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS (MISD. )
SGT. PUFFER 2
SGT. PROTELSCH 2 5
SCHWALBACH 16 7 1
FERGUSON 2 15 10
STURDEVANT 15 20
MAC QUEEN 2 10 25 1
THOEMKE 4 32 7 2
LUTHER 2 22 5 1 3
JOHNSTON 2 44 2 2 2
TOTAL 12 156 83. 5 7
TOTAL TAGS ISSUED 263
DATE: April 21, 1982
• TO: Donald Hickerson, Chief of Police
FROM: R. Engstrom, Investigator
SUBJECT: Case Status For March, 1982
I screened fifty-five (55) new cases for March, 1982 . Sixteen
(16) of those cases met the criteria for an active investiga-
tion. I also carried eleven (11) cases from previous months.
Five (5) of those were closed out by complaints. One (1) was
closed out due to lack of sufficient evidence.
Seventeen (17) suspects have been developed in those cases in-
vestigated in March of 1982 . Only two (2) have been formally
charged along with five ( 5) others from previous months. Both
Ramsey and Hennepin Counties have cases involving ten ( 10) sus-
pects to be charged and charges are pending on two (2) others
as of the date of this memorandum.
Residential burglary and theft from auto are the highest re-
ported incidents of crime for March, 1982 . we had four ( 4)
major burglary groups working in our city since January of this
year. Most have been identified and our officers are aware of
the suspects ' identities and vehicles.
• Of those cases investigated for March, 1982 , are as follows:
2 - Aggravated Forgeries 3 - Suspects 2 - Charged
2 - Felony Theft 4 - Suspects Pending
4 - Burglary-Residence 4 - Suspects Pending
3 - Theft From Business 3 - Suspects 2 - Charged
1 - Criminal Sexual Conduct -
4th degree
1 - Incest 1 - Suspect Pending
1 - Auto Theft 2 - Suspects Pending
1 - Child Abuse 1 - Suspect Cleared
by Court
1 - Possession Sm. Amt. M.J. 1 - Suspect Cited
Suspect developed by Ramsey County Sheriff' s Office (Sting Operation)
Total loss from thefts and burglaries $ 70, 679. 56
Total loss from vandalism 1 , 857. 00
Total receiving of stolen property 18, 516 . 99
Two (2) Search warrants were executed in March.
•
TO: Don Hickerson - 2 - April 21 , 1982
Officer Luther should be commended for his assistance given in
both search warrants to aid in the execution, search, recovery
• of property and the arrest of suspects. (He donated his time. )
Special attention should be noted in a forgery case at LaBelles ,
March 8, 1982 , C.N. 8201669. The Assistant Manager, Sam Preese ,
should be commended for his alertness in obtaining the License
Number of the suspect 's vehicle and made the positive identifi-
cation of the suspect and his companion. This information lead
to the search warrant, arrest and complaint.
Officer Schwalbach should be commended for his alertness in the
arrest of a female employee at LaBelles on March 17, 1982 , C.N.
8201835, for felony theft. Because of his arrest of this em-
ployee, it lead to the recovery of additional stolen property
and two (2) more felony arrests . More than $2 , 500. 00 in stolen
property was recovered due to Officer Schwalbach' s efforts.
Were it not for the attention to detail and evidence gathered
by Officers Luther and Schwalbach in these cases , the investi-
gations could have been bogged down, causing extra time and
effort to conclude the cases .
Additional efforts have been made by some of our patrol officers
to gather intelligence information on known burglars in our area.
•
RE: c z
•
MONTHLY REPORT -- MARCH, 1982
• SERGEANT PUFFER
This report contains activities other than the Sergeant ' s regular
shift duties. The report covers police training and other police
related programs presented by myself.
March 11 Work on Crime Prevention Program. Ordered Crime Prey
vention films.
March 17 Officer Evaluation for December, 1981.
Work on Crime Prevention Program. Preview Crime Pre-
vention films to be used for training our police offi-
cers and our reserves.
Film #1 - Functions Of A Crime Prevention Unit
Film #2 - Before Its Too Late
March 19 Crime Prevention training program for Officers J. Luther,
R. Schwalbach, D. Johnston and two reserve officers .
Four Hour Session --
• Topic:
a. Introduction to Crime Prevention
Programs :
1. Crime Watch Program
2 . Citizen Police Involvment
3. Operation I . D.
Definition of Crime Prevention
Definition of a Crime
March 23 Order five sets of slides and brochures (scripts) from
Minnesota Crime Watch for Crime Prevention Program.
•
M I N U T E S
•
St. Anthony Chemical Abuse Information Committee
April 13, 1982 - 7:00 P.M.
High School Library
MEMBERS PRESENT: Evelyn Holthus, Pat Beaubien, Jean Klosterman,
Karen Thoreson-Quinn, Paul Rebelein, Jan Stroom
and Ruth Hultgren
In the absence of our President, Ruth Hultgren, the meeting was called
to order at 7:05 P.M. by Secretary, Jean Klosterman.
The secretary's minutes of the March 9th meeting were approved as sub-
mitted to the committee.
The treasurer's report was given by Karen indicating a current balance
on hand of $1,076.89. Expenses incurred for distribution booklets during
this past month include the following:
Al Anon $ 43.90
Superintendent of Documents 60.00
Alcohol Research 175.00
$278.90
• Old Business:
1. Evelyn advised that she had been in contact with Carl Eller
and a firm commitment had been established wherein,�CArl will
be available to students and staff on Monday, May `from
8:30 A.M. to approximately 1:00 P.M. Two general assemblies
will be set up, one for the middle school and one for the
high school students. Carl will also be available for smaller
group settings.
A letter was drafted to be sent to twelve community organiza-
tions advising them of Carl's program and requesting their
financial assistance to assist in defraying the costs of this
program.
2. The letter relating to "Drinking and Driving Education" was
mailed on March 16th to seventeen St. Anthony organizations.
3. A letter outlining the committee's objectives and goals was
mailed on April 12th to 38 professional offices and 4 local
churches advising them of reading material being made available
relative chemical abuse. Distribution of this material will be
made between April 19th and April 24th by Pat Beaubien, Ruth
Hultgren and Jan Stroom. Packets for each area were organized
by the committee at the close of the meeting.
April 13, 1982 - Minutes
Page 2
Old Business: (continued) •
4. Pat will also complete the emergency "Help" cards and arrange
for their printing at Apache Print Shop.
5. Ruth advised the committee of the handling ,of our recommendation
on alcohol use at the March 15th School Board meeting. She also
presented a copy of the excellent article covering this meeting
as published in the Bulletin on March 18th.
Ruth, Jan and Evelyn plan to be present. at the next School Board
meeting when the second reading of this policy recommendation
is scheduled.
6. In the absence of Jim Stephens, the matter relating to the
Lion's Club speaker was tabled until our next monthly meeting.
New Business:
1. Evelyn read an article published in Madison, Wisconsin entitled
"In Memory of Jim" relating the impact of chemical abuse on
their loved ones.
2. Evelyn advised the committee of a newly organized citizens
advisory committee, Eastside Hennepin County Human Services
Council, and a public forum they will be holding on April 19th. •
She will contact this organization to make them aware of our
committee and the work it has been doing in the community.
The next meeting of the St. Anthony Chemical Abuse Information Committee
will be Tuesday., May 11th at 7:00 P.M. in the high school library.
Respectfully submitted,
�., ::�iJ o= ice"`. /.YC.�L��;z�•�'r./
Jean' L. Klosterman`
Secretary
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
April 20 , 1982
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Pro Tem Makowske at
• 7 : 30 P.M.
Present for roll call : Peterson , Zawislak, Makowske , and Bjorklund.
Absent: Jones (;arrived at 7 : 32 P.M. ) , Bowerman, Sopcinski .
Also present: Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant.
Motion by Mr. Peterson and seconded by Mr. Zawislak to approve as
submitted the minutes of the Planning Commission Public Hearing on
Year VIII CDBG Funds held March 16 , 1982 .
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Mr., Peterson and seconded by Mr. Zawislak to approve with
the following amendments , the minutes for the Planning Commission
regular meeting held March 16 , 1982 :
Page 4 , . Para. 6 : Substitute " 85 square feet) for "80 square feet"
in line 10 .
Para. 7: Delete "on his way home for a Council work session
in the same building" .
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Jones chaired the meeting from- this point on.
Mrs . Makowske .was named to represent the Commission at the next Council
meeting, April 27, 1982 .
Mr. Berg distributed copies of his April 20th memorandum related to the
initiation of a proposed ordinance amendment, which would permit
tanning booths as a conditionally permitted use in the City , which he
requested be considered as an agenda addendum -under #6A. He reported
Keith Grewe approached him seeking permission to set up such a business
in Apache two weeks ago. Mr. Grewe reported having been assured by
Mr. Cavanaugh of the Apache management that this use would fit in wi=th
one of the existing categories of permitted uses in the City such as
physical culture and health gyms , spas or clubs , and when the
Administrative Assistant informed the Apache representative that the
City Attorney did not see it that way, Mr. Cavanaugh indicated the
Apache corporation 's legal firm would discuss the difference in opinion
with the City Attorney which evidently was not done .
s Mrs . Makowske and Mr. Bjorklund both indicated a reluctance to take
any action on what could prove to be a controversial matter without
the public being notified of its consideration through its inclusion
on the agenda which is posted throughout the community. Mrs . Makowske
believed the amendment might generate a fair amount of interest and
concern as to the type of activities and operation of this kind of
enterprise which is a new concept for the community . She disagreed
• the public input might be provided during the hearings before the
Council , insisting she would be unable to make a recommendation to the
Council without resident input. Mr. Jones commented that the pro-
cedure for other proposals had been speeded up in the past.
:I .
-2-
Motion by Mrs . Makowske and seconded by Mr. Bjorklund to table action
on the proposed initiation of an ordinance amendment to establish
tanning booths as a conditionally permitted use . until the�'nekt scheduled
Planning Commission meeting.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Commission then agreed to hold an informal discussion on the
concept with the applicant if he appeared later in the evening.
At 7 : 44 P.M. the Chairman opened the public hearing on the consideration
of the petition for variances to the City Zoning Ordinance which
would be required for the proposed senior housing on the vacant lot
at approximately 2651 Kenzie Terrace , by reading the notice of the
hearing which had gone out to all property owners within 200 feet of
the site . No one present indicated failure to receive the notice or
objected to its contents . Mr. Berg told Mrs . Makowske a hearing on
variances only requires notification of neighbors within 200 feet ,
while the previous hearings on a similar proposal required notification
within 350 feet because a rezoning was involved at that time. He
confirmed the application fee had been paid and reported he had
attached to the notice a letter to the residents informing them that
this is a scaled down .version of the proposal made in 1980 which had
narrowly failed to receive HUD financing. Only one resident,
Virginia Kieffer, 2613 27th Avenue N.E. was present. As he had
informed the Commission in his April 16th memorandum, Mr. Berg
reiterated the variances for building height, unit density and unit
floor area which will be required for the proposed 60 unit building.
The project is now planned to include 44 one bedroom units of 540
square feet each, 15 efficiencies which are 415 square feet, and one
two bedroom caretaker apartment. The unit .sizes have been pared down
to adhere to HUD guidelines , a copy of which Mr. Berg gave to Mr.
Bjorklund.
Archie Fjeld and Mary Gabler, representing the sponsoring organization' s
Board of Directors ; Robert Giere of the Eberhardt Company , its financial
consultant; and Jack Boarman , the project architect, who had discussed
the proposal with the Commission during the CDBG hearing March 16th,
were again present to answer questions regarding the Northeast Senior
Federation's proposal , including how much tax revenue the City could
anticipate. collecting in accordance with Title II subsidized housing
regulations . Mr. Giere estimated the taxes. would total $24 ,000 , or
from $300 to $400 per unit, a year, for the project.
Mr. Fjeld replied to the Commission' s concerns with the downgrading
of the dwelling unit size by telling them the federation would have
preferred providing units which would conform to the City ordinance
requirements for one bedroom units , with no efficiencies at all, but
the plans had to be redrawn to match the monies which can be
expected to be granted under the new HUD regulations . Ms . Gabler
reported local HUD officials are in agreement with the federation
assumption that there is little or no market for efficiencies and
urged City officials to indicate their support for that stand to the
• area HUD office.
-3-
Mr. Jones indicated he feared resistance from St. Anthony seniors to
the size of the units and was concerned that the City 's objectives of
encouraging the elderly to sell their homes to young families and move
• into the new apartments might be defeated. .There was a general
agreement by all present who have seen similar one bedroom arrangements
in the senior buildings at 18th and Central and 39th and Stinson ,
that the way these units are laid out might be acceptable , as long
as community space is provided in the building for entertaining.
Mrs . Makowske indicated her concerns with the type of traffic which
can be expected to be generated by placing the service entrance to
the rear of the building. Mr. Boarman told her he expects the alley
off Wilson Avenue to be used for miscellaneous deliveries and, as it
is now, for garbage collections . He said the dumpsters with compactors
can be designed large enough to require no more than a maximum of two
collections a week. These receptacles will be well screened by
plantings and a redwood fence, he added.
Mr. Giere reported there are no longer HUD funds available for the
congregate dining room originally planned for the building which will
leave more community space available for other purposes . The finance
consultant estimated it will- cost $40 ,000 per unit to construct the
building.
Mrs . Kieffer indicated she was primarily concerned that garbage
collections be made no oftener than twice a week and Mr. Fjeld told
her she could rely on the building management to ' see the seniors
are not awakened by early morning collections . Mrs . Kieffer 's con-
. cerns related to the availability of parking if the Legion' s and
seniors ' activities should coincide were addressed by Mr. Fjeld who
told her there is parking available in the shopping center across
Kenzie Terrace and there are 41 parking spaces provided in' this pro-
posal where only 20 are required by City ordinance. She was also
assured that adequate snow storage will be provided as well.
When Mr. Berg asked why the plan doesn' t provide an access to the
rear of the building from Kenzie Terrace , Mr. Boarman pointed out that
a driveway would have to be built right next to 8 or 10 windows of
apartments built at ground level on that side. The architect also
said that only one-half of the building will be four stories tall
which will permit less visual interference , permit more units per
floor, and create a more interesting appearance for the building.
The hearing was closed at 8 :55 P.M.
Mr. Bjorklund reported Mr. Sopcinski had contacted him to report his
inability to be in attendance and had indicated his opposition to the
proposal because of the size of the units now being proposed, a concern
Mr. Bjorklund said he shared until he had ' been convinced the need for
senior housing for the City outweighs these objections . Ms . Gabler
confirmed the City ' s allocation will be based on the HUD guideline
size and therefore , additional. funding will have to be sought if the
units are to be built larger than the guidelines dictate. She and
• Mr. Fjeld assured Mr. Jones that the building management will utilize
all available resources to keep the building residents involved
in community activities and not isolated as so many of the elderly are
today. Mr. Fjeld said he has already contacted four senior organiza-
tions in the area in this regard.
-4-
The three conditions set by City ordinance for granting variances
were addressed in the following recommendation:
• Motion by Mr. Bjorklund and seconded by Mr. Zawislak to recommend the
Council grant the variances to City Zoning Ordinance requirements
necessary for the construction of a 60 unit senior building as pro-
posed on the vacant lot currently identified as Plat 63507 , Parcel
7620 by the Northeast Senior Federation with funding from the HUD
202 program including:
(1) building height from 35 to 372 feet for a 22 foot variance;
(2) from 30 to 60 dwelling units for a 30 unit variance ; and
(3) unit floor area efficiencies ,. up to 25% efficiencies , from 500
to 415 square feet, for a total variance of 86 square feet; up
to 100% one bedroom units , from 650 to 540 square feet , for a
total variance of 110 square feet.
The Commission finds that:
(a) The proposed building is designed and intended to serve only
senior citizens .
(b) The proposed building is designed and intended to utilize public
funding.
(c) The City of St. Anthony has no other similar non-profit senior
housing facilities .
(d) The City of St. Anthony has a strong demand for provision of non-
profit senior housing facilities.
(e) Sufficient distance and screening in the plan (as labeled and
included in this recommendation) reduces any potential - negative
impact from building height or density on the adjacent property
owners .
(f) Similar senior housing projects in Minneapolis and Columbia
Heights have similar, or, in fact , smaller dwelling units ; greater
or equal number of dwelling units per square foot of land area
(density; are built higher; and have fewer parking spaces per
dwelling unit and less landscaping/screening than this proposal .
(g) Real estate taxes produced by this development will be far greater
than those produced by the vacant land.
(h) Site access and neighboring homeowners ' concerns have been
adequately addressed.
(i) The City of St. Anthony has no specific or adequate zoning
regulations for senior housing.
(j ) The Commission foresees this project may spur further Kenzie
• Terrace redevelopment and rejuvenation.
(k) No adverse input was received during the public hearing before
the Planning Commission.
Motion carried unanimously.
-5-
The meeting was recessed at 9 :05 P.M. and reconvened at 9 :15 P.M. to
consider the Craig Morris landscaping and fencing agreement compliance
as related to the Letter of Credit which expires May 1 , 1982 .
Mr. Berg addressed the City 's options related to Craig Morris ' non-
compliance with the conditions of the Letter of Credit issued when
his development of the property at 3909 Silver Lake Road was permitted
under the Hedlund PUD, as was indicated in his April 16th memorandum.
He showed pictures he had taken of the fence which Mr. Morris has begun
to construct and all agreed this was not the "metal slatted chain link
fence" stipulated by the Council when it granted an extension of -the
Letter of Credit November ,24 , 1981. The letter from Mr. Morris
indicating his willingness to provide such a fence before May lst,
was read aloud and the site plan for the landscaping viewed to ascertain
whether the plantings are being provided as agreed to by Mr. Morris
when the PUD was approved.
Kenneth Lee who is constructing a home directly behind the Morris
shop on Penrod, was present and reported Mr. Morris is building a
"makeshift fence of two by fours which won' t last two years" . Mr. Lee
added that he has been unsuccessful in his efforts to get Mr. Morris
to share in the costs of providing a suitable fence or to trim the
dying oak tree which is on the property line. He also said his
property has been graded so a new fence can be erected any time now.
Mr. Jones sees Mr. Morris as a "very uncooperative person" , as evidenced
by his absence for the discussion, and the fact that he has completely
ignored the City ' s request to cycle his lighting to conform to his
• shop hours of business. He and Mr. Peterson are in agreement that
since Mr. Morris will not deal with the City on a face to face basis ,
there appears to be no alternative to revoking the Letter of Credit
and using the proceeds to construct an adequate fence as required by
the PUD. Mr. Jones requested staff to verify the revocation procedure
before April 30th.
Motion by Mr. Bjorklund and seconded by Mrs . Makowske to recommend
Council denial of any further extensions of the Letter of Credit
issued to assure landscaping conformance at 3909 Silver Lake Road and
to cash in the Letter of Credit if the terms are not met April 30 ,
1982 , finding that: (1) the City has already granted Mr. Morris con-
cessions based on weather, general economic conditions and his own
personal financial status as well as extensive departures from the
PUD requirements for landscaping; (2) Mr. Morris has clearly failed
to live up to his agreement to provide landscaping and fencing which
were conditions for extension .of the Letter of Credit set by the
Council when it granted the extension November 24 , 1981; and (3)
Mr. Morris is clearly in substantial and. significant non-conformance
with his letter of agreement to provide shrubbery and fencing as
shown on the proposed site plan for the development of this site.
Motion carried unanimously.
Keith Grewe , 1001 Orchard Avenue , appeared to discuss the tanning salon
• he proposes to operate next to the Bowl-a-Mat on the lower level of
the Apache Plaza Shopping Center. He is an unemployed truck driver,
he told the Commission members, and has already invested $16 ,000 in
the Tan Me , Inc. franchise which the City Attorney has indicated does
not fit into any existing category of permitted uses in the City
-6-
Zoning Ordinance. . According to Mr. Grewe , it will take at least three
or four weeks to get into operation and, if the City approval is de-
layed, he will miss out on the peak season and suffer a loss of about
$10 ,000 each month he is not in operation.
Mr. Grewe was accompanied by Tom VanMeter, President of Tan Me , Inc. ,
who disagreed the services offered by Mr. Grewe . would substantially
differ from the type of services already offered in the Mall in a
barber shop, beauty salon, the health club ' and in the Weight Watchers
salon, which with a dance studio, are allowed by the City ordinance.
Mr. VanMeter questioned why there should be a prejudice against a
service which is so similar to other permitted uses and told the
Commission St. Louis Park permitted him to operate a salon while they
were determining its classification under their ordinances . The
franchise president then invited the Commission members to visit his
salon near the Maplewood Mall to ascertain its legitimacy and to see
for themselves the salon is not a front for immoral purposes . He
added that the five tanning rooms are booked a week ahead , .at this
time.
Mr. Bjorklund told Mr. VanMeter that, if the proposal had been on the
agenda that evening, he would probably have made such an inspection
before the meeting, but he does - not believe he could make an educated
decision regarding a recommendation without seeing a franchise
brochure; a physical layout of the salon; and evidence that the
operation meets all state and city health codes . He would also like
to know the typical age and economic status of the clientelle as well
as the cost of the services offered, and the signage and methods of
Sadvertising the salons would be of interest to him as well .
Mr. Jones commented that he believes Mr. Grewe ' s problems are a result
of bad advice from Mr. Cavanaugh and suggested the best method he
sees for moving the proposal along would be to have the legal dif-
ferences resolved by the attorneys , as was originally intended. The
Chairman then informed Mr. Grewe that the City Attorney will be
present when this matter is reported back to the Council during their
meeting April 27th.
The fence ordinance proposed by the Public Works Director was con-
sidered next and referred to the Commission for their recommendations
by the Council.
There was Commission agreement that Subdivision 1 of Requirements
should be amended to indicate "the fence shall be set back at least
six inches from the property line, unless the property has been
surveyed to assure there will be no encroachment onto adjoining private
or public property or public right-of-way , or there is a written
agreement with the adjoining property owner if the fence is built
on the property line" .
Two Commission members disagreed with Mr. Bjorklund that there is a
need for stipulating the size of fences for front yards , foreseeing
an enforcement problem for staff.
• Motion by Mr. Bjorklund and seconded by Mr. Jones that Subdivision 3
of Requirements of the proposed Ordinance 1982-003 be amended to read:
-7-
"No fence shall be over 6 feet in height, or over 4 feet high in the
front yard" .
• Voting on the motion:
Aye: Bjorklund, .Jones , and Makowske .
Nay : Peterson and Zawislak.
Motion carried.
Mr. Jones asked Mr. Berg to suggest to the Council that they might
consider a reference to berming, as a means of by-passing the City
ordinance, when they are considering the first reading of the
ordinance.
Motion by Mr. Bjorklund and seconded by Mr. Peterson to recommend
Council adoption of Ordinance 1982-003 , with the suggested amend-
ments , finding that the ordinance can be expected to:
(1) facilitate communications between neighbors;
(2) reduce the number of conflicts and disagreements between
neighbors ;
(3) reduce encroachment problems ; and,
(4) reduce nuisances and injuries from dangerously constructed
fences in St. Anthony.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Mrs . Makowske and seconded by Mr. Zawislak to adjourn
the meeting at 10 : 55 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted
Helen Crowe
Secretary
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
, April 22, 1982 Ordinance Reports-3a
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Commissioner
Other
April 27, 1982 Informational Salverda Schedule
------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: Dave Childs , City Manager
----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Ramsey County Commissioner Don Sa 1 ve rda's
Friday morning meeting schedule is as follows.
April 30 - St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, David Gitch, Hospital Administrator
May 7 - County Engineer, Ken Weltzin
May 14 - open
All meetings are Friday at 8:30 A.M. at Sambo's Restaurant, County Road "D" and
Old Highway 8.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES :
RECOMMENDATION: For your information.
CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
-----------------------------------------------------
tDate Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
April 23, 1982 Ordinance Reports-3b
Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion TitleSurface Water Man-
-x-- Other
April 27. 1982 Discussion agement Plan-AMM Info
------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David Childs, City Manager
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Attached are memos from the Association of
Metro Municipalities regarding the Metro Council Surface Water Management Proposal
and upcoming hearing as well as the meeting of the Joint Commission on Metropolitan
Governance. Copies of the full surface water plan are available at City Hall
( I have two rather lengthy copies) .
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES : For information and discussion purposes.
RECOMMENDATION: I wi l l be attending the hearing on the 29th and hope that
you have thought about any comments which you want me to present at that time.
You are also encouraged to attend one of the hearings if you wish and are
available to do so.
CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS:
association of I N
metropolitan
municipalities
April 19, 1982
TO: AhZ.4 Member Cities
FROM: =2.1 Staff
RE: Public Hearing: Metropolitan Council proposed Surface Water Management
Plan
- - - SURFACE ,'DATER RA21AGE-�.^NT PROPOSAL - PUBLIC HEARING;. APRIL 29th - - -
Sometime ago, (April 7th. AA,u,i Bulletin) we alerted you to the fact that the
Metropolitan Council had scheduled a Public Hearing on April 29th. to receive
• comments on their proposed Surface Water Management Plan. The Council expects to
adopt this plan sometime after the conclusion of the Public Hearing and issue it
as Chapter in its Metropolitan Development Guide.
We have now completed an analysis of the proposed Surface Vlater Management Plan
and identified those portions and sections of the plan which are in conflict
with or inconsistent ,,iith the Surface Water Management Act (Chapter 509) which
was passed during the 1932 Legislative Session. The before referenced AMM Bulletin
contained a summary of Chapter 509. Attached to this bulletin is a summary of
the ASA Staff comments to the Councils proposed Guide Chapter which we will present
at the Public Hearing. A number of city officials have asked for a copy of these
comments to assist them in preparing testimony for the hearing.
Again, we urge you to review the Councils proposal very carefully and if it is
a concern to your city, present your comments at the April 29th. hearing.
- - - JOINT LEGISLATIVE C01:2:EISSION ON METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE
Attached is a meeting notice of the Joint Legislative Commission on Metropolitan
Governance. There will be opportunity for testimony at this meeting should you
wish to testify. The A-111 7.,ias the principal sponsor of the Legislation authored
by Representative Carol;-n Rodriquez in the 1981 Legislative Session which established
this Commission to examine the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Commissions.
WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL RECEIVING THIS BULLETIN
• MAKE DISTRIBUTION TO TkE APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS I14 YOUR CITY.
Thank you.
300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street, st. Paul, minneso(a 55101 (6 12) 222-2461
-1-
"7d STAFF RECOTA ENDATIONS TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCILS PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MkIAGE!.ENT PLAN
Overall General ATAI REcommendations:
1. In all cases for organization, planning, implementation and funding,
the Surface Water Management Guide should be modified to conform and
be consistant with the Surface Water Management Act, Minnesota Laws
1982 Chapter 509, Sections 12 through 26. In no case should this
plan exceed the authority granted by Chapter 509.
2. The map and description of watershed boundries should be reviewed to
ensure conformence with official maps developed by the DNR pursuant
to Laws 1977, Chapter 455, Section 33, Subdivision 7(a), as required
by Chapter 509.
3. The Guide should conform to Chapter 509 providing an orderly and
achievable time frame for the organization of Plater Management
Organizations, planning by the WM0 and planning by the local units
within each WMO.
4. Metropolitan Council involvement in the review process of PIDIO plans
should be limited to review and comment only with a clear distinction
made between general advisory comments and those pertaining to affects
upon the four systems, as referenced by the Comprehensive Planning Act
of 1976. Council involvement for local plans should be limited to
• the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process established by law only if
amendments to the local comprehensive plan is necessary.
5. Funding for planning, implementation, and maintenance should be at the
IV140 or local level as appropriate except where state funds can be obtained
to augment the costs of the Surface Water Management Act mandates.
Metropolitan Regional funding should not be used.
6. This draft policy plan defines many management practices and guidelines to
be included in WMO and local plans. Where these guidelines exceed those
required by Chapter 509 they should not be required but be suggested or
advisory in nature. All references to 'will' , 'should' or 'shall' in a
mandatory way when inconsistant with Chapter 509 should be changed.
7. Policy 14 as written infers that treatment of surface water plans for A95
review purposes may be elevated to a status similar to 'policy 39' for
Housing. This is totally without foundation and should be modified to
indicate clearly that the local surface water plan will only generate A95
comments for surface water related projects.
8. The Metropolitan Council should continue its role as a provider of
technical assistance information, and data gathering to help PR-AO's and l0:!?1
units prepare Surface Plater Management Plans.
•
-2-
Specific Recommendations for Policy Plan Su.- ary p.ii - viii
Page iv, 'The Program'
- paragraph 2; The organization for plannnino and implementation should
be the same.
- paragraph 4; The Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976 need not be
changed. Laws 1982, Chapter 509 provides the planning mandate as
requested in this document.
Page iv and v, 'Minnesota Legislature'
- paragraphs 1-3; These have been included in Chapter 509.
- paragraph 4; Metropolitan wide funding is opposed.
- paragraph 5; The Land Planning Act need not be amended.
- paragraph 6; State funding for this mandated program is supported.
- paragraph 7; Chapter 509 provides sufficient authority for planning
and implementation. This paragraph is unnecessary.
- paragraph 8; Included in Chapter 509.
Page v, 'State of TAinnesota'
• Chapter 509 basically accomplishes the 'Lead Agency' request by
establishing the State Water Resources Board as the approval authority
for Watershed Boundries and VNIO plans as well the final arbitrator in
any two county dispute concerning implementation project funding.
Page v and vi, 1Ii1etropolitan Council'
- preparagraph 2 line 4; The Metropolitan Council is not the agency
designated for reviewing local storm ,rater management plans. Per
Chapter 509, the WMO is the designated agency. This statement should
be changed to indicate this authority.
- paragraph 1,4 and 5; Metropolitan fu_ndirg is opposed. Plan approval is
riot designated to the Council by Chapter 509.
- paragraph 3; Review local plans only if comn_rehensive plan changes are
necessary.
Page vi, 'Watershed Organization'
- paragraph 3; V00's should not be required to comply with anything in
this plan which is not required in Cha.oter 509 unless this plan is
changed to conform with Chapter 509.
Page vi, 'Counties'
This paragraph should be stricken or modified to reflect the co-..minty
limited role of reviewing WMO plans, establishing a WI:40 where local
• units have not done so, and approval of implementation projects only
where county funding is sought.
Page vii, "Financing'
Metropolitan Funding is opposed. State funding is supported if it can be
obtained.
-3-
Page vii and viii, 'Policy Summary'
- policy 1; The word 'Managed' should be changed to 'coordinated' .
- policy 2; Watersheds as defined by this policy are acceptable if they
conform to DIIR boundries established per Laws 1977 Chapter 455, Section 33,
Subdivision 7(a) as spelled out in Chapter 509.
- policies 3 through 10; , These are acceptable
- policy 11; Watershed plans should only be required to contain elements
as per Chapter 509. They may contain more detail following guidelines
recommended by this policy plan. Metropolitan Council review should be
based on effects to the four systems as defined in the Comprehensive
Planning Act of 1976.
- policy 12; This is acceptable
- policy 13; 1:4odification to the Land. Planning Act is unnecessary. Local
plans should follow guidelines established by Chapter 509 but may provide
more detail per guidelines recommended by this policy plan
- policy 14; This policy suggests a possible treatment much the same as the
Housing 'Policy 39' for A95 reviews. If this is .-ihat is intended, this
policy is strongly opposed. We see no reason to elevate Surface Water
Management to that unique status over other items such as park plan, etc.
•
•
-4-
Specific Recommendations for Policy Plan
Page 2 Policy l; Surface Water system should be 'coordinated' on a
Metropolitan basis, not 'managed' Chapter 509 clearly provides this
ability.
Page 39-40; Watershed boundries as defined should be reviewed to ensure
conformance with DNR established boundries and Chapter 509.The last two
paragraphs on page 39 require extraordinary measures for 'critical
watersheds' . These should be changed to 'suggest' not require additional
measures.
Page 95-97 New Watershed Management Organizations. This entire section,
specifically the item paragraphs 1 through 10 on pages 96 and 97, should
be rewritten to reflect the county limited role per Chapter 509.
Metropolitan funding reference in item 5 should be deleted...
Page 98, first paragraph. It is unnecessary to amend the 1976 Land
Planning Act. This paragraph should be deleted.
Page 98, Policy 11; This policy should be rewritten based on AMM comments
for Page vii and viii, policy 11.
Page 98, Policy 13; This policy should be deleted. The planning act need
not be amended.
• Page 98, Policy 14; This policy should be better defined as to intent and
AMM recommendations followed based on comments for page vii and viii, policy 14.
Page 99, Minnesota Legislature. Refer to VAI comments for Page iv and v,
Minnesota Legislature.
Page 100, Metropolitan Council. Refer to A11 comments for Page v and vi.
Metropolitan Council.
Page 105, Financing - General. This plan recommends all initial planning to
be financed at the Metropolitan Level. The X.11-41 recommends that all planning
be financed at the level of planning (WMO - Watershed, Local - Local- or through.
state grants.
Page 106-107, Financing - Metropolitan Council. The AUA opposes regional
financing as recommended in the last sentance of paragraph 2 on page 106 and
the one time one-third mill levy as recommended in the last paragraph of this
section on page 107.
Page 107 - Financing - Watershed Management Organization. This plan proposes
that the county be the responsible agency for planning. The AUM opposes this
broad concept of county responsibility as does existing law per Chapter 509.
Paragraphs 1 and 2 should be deleted.
•
-5-
• Page 109, paragraph 3 indicates that Watershed Districts have the power to
tax for specific projects. Prior to th:e enactment of Chapter 509, Watershed
Districts only had the power to assess. It may be advisable to rework this
paragraph and/or entire section to better reflect current la;r per Chapter 509.
Page 111. The recom endations for changing Watershed District Financing have
been made by Chapter 509.
Pages 113-117 Guidelines; Generally, the guidelines listed for 1WAO and local
plans are consistent with state law but tend to suggest greater detail. If
modifications are made to this plan as suggested earlier which makes, it. clear that
the guidelines are advisory where they exceed Chapter 509 requirements, no
changes are suggested. If however the previous changes are not made, then
these guidelines should be modified to be consistent with Chapter 509.
Minnesota
John E. Brandl �� �.us'
:., � `
District 61A � _,.rte� ,�Y
Hennepin County _' r
Committees:
Representatives
' � • >�Lai=�:��;;
Health and Welfare
Local and Urban Affairs ; Harry A.Sieben,Jr.,Speaker
Taxes
Transportation April 16, 1982
MEETING NOTICE
TO: Joint Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance
FROM: Chairman, Representative John Brandl
DATE: Wednesday, May 5, 1982 - 7 : 00 to 9 : 00 P.M.
LOCATION: Shakopee Junior High School
1137 Marschall FZoad
Shakopee Minnesota
Telephone 445-4886 (Principal Jack Cole)
The Joint Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance
will hold it ' s first meeting outside of the Capitol at
• the Shakopee Junior High School .
We 'will hear testimony from individuals, groups and
organizations regarding their thoughts and concerns
about regional government in the Metropolitan area
and their views on the Metropolitan Council .
If you wish to testify, call Karen James at 296-4279 ,
so we can place your name on the agenda. Please limit
your comments to 5-10 minutes so that all those wishing
to testify can be accommodated.
If you have any questions, please call Karen James at 296-4279
or Beverly Zaine at 296-4837 .
JB/bz
(Directions:
From the Twin Cities take 351q south to Highway 13 . This
• turns into Highway 101 which will take you into Shakopee.
At the first stop light (Marschall Road) turn left and
go 12 blocks to the Jr. High School )
'c
Reply to: ❑ 288 State Office Building,St.Paul,Minnesota 55155 Office:(612)290-4837 I,1'
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 22, 1982
• TO: Dave Childs , City Manager ,
Department Heads
Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant
FROM: Connie Kroeplin, Secretary.
SUBJECT: Notes on April 21 , 1982 Staff Meeting
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The meeting opened at 9:05 A.M. Present: Ron Berg, Dave Childs, Larry Hamer,
Don Nickerson, Ray Nelson, Lee Entner, and Connie Kroeplin. Absent: Carol Johnson.
Mr. Childs stated a City resident, Bernard Preussner, will be present at the
Council 's April 27th meeting. Mr. Preussner lives on Skycrof.t Drive and would like
to speak to the Council regarding the parking of vehicles on the street in front of
his home.
Mr. Childs will also present the 2nd reading on the ordinance relating to a water
rate increase. He also noted that the Council tabled Sroga's license at their
April 13th meeting because of complaints by neighbors. All concerned parties have
been invited to attend Council 's April 27th meeting.
There was discussion on the formation of a skating rink committee. The purpose
of this committee would be to seek solutions regarding the City's three skating
• rinks and the high cost of operation. Some suggestions for committee members
were Ron Hanson (a former Booster) ; Larry Hamer (Public Works Director) ; Tom
McMullen (Assistant District #282 Superintendent) ; a. Councilman; and another
City resident. Mr. Childs requested a final recommendation from this committee by
August.
Mr. Hamer will be requesting two change orders for repairs on Well #4 at the Council 's
April 27th meeting. He said if the Council approves the 2 change orders, the money
spent would be saved in two 5 year periods, as the requested stainless steel would
not corrode nearly as quickly as steel..
Ray Nelson discussed installing a wide-screen for viewing movies, sporting events,
etc. at the Stonehouse. Consensus was this idea is a good one and discussion ensued
on a VCR versus H.B.O. type systems. Mr. Nelson indicated he would have a chalk board
where he would list what was to be shown, so the patrons would be aware of what they
could watch. Mr. Childs requested Mr. Nelson to gather cost data on these type of
systems.
Mr. Berg briefly discussed the items which were on the Planning Commission 's agenda
the previous night. They were:
(1) Craig Morris ' letter of credit could have to be called in and the City would
have to erect a chain link fence on the property if Mr. Morris does not comply.
(2) The Senior Federation's three variances were recommended for approval .
• (3) The fence ordinance was approved with some recommended changes.
-2-
Mr. Berg had requested an addendum to the Planning Commission's agenda, which was
denied. The addendum concerned tanning booths and the Commission recommended
speaking to the City .Attorney on this matter.
Mr. Hamer met with Tom McMullen of the school district concerning their request for
fencing at the parks. It is felt this cannot be done because of space problems.
Mr. Hamer also mentioned the topic of the bathrooms at the parks and when they should
be open.
Mr. Childs will attend a meeting on union contracts on April 22nd and asked the
Department Heads to contact him if they wanted to make any changes in the 1983
contracts. Chief Hickerson reported that MAPSI will be patrolling this Saturday,
April 24th and next Saturday, May 1st. Mr. Childs asked Mr. Berg to contact the
new gun importers and imported beer wholesaler businesses regarding occupancy permits.
Lee Entner presented several items for discussionu They were:
(1) Cards containing pertinent information on all the businesses in the City.
These would be used for emergency purposes.
(2) He has had discussions with C.G. Rein (owners of Apache Plaza) regarding
paint clogged sprinkler heads; the Furniture Barn and underground gas tanks
which should have been removed but so far have not. This violation will be
cited.
(3) Civil defense planning will be conducted in 4 stages.
• (4) Brief discussion on the siren's malfunction.
(5) We are paying for several telephone circuits which are no longer in use.
This is being corrected.
Meeting adjourned at 10:45 A.M.
cmk
•
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
---------------------------------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
April 21 , 1982 X Ordinance Unfinished Business-]
Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion TitleOrdinance 1982-004
Other
April 27, 1982 Water Rate Increase
---------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David Childs, City. Manager
-----------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Second reading of ordinance regarding water
rate increase. No calls or questions regarding this have been received by this
office to date.
FISCAL IMPACT: See report in April 13, 1982 agenda package.
ALTERNATIVES :
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval on second reading.
CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
• ORDINANCE 1982-004
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATER RATES; AME'TDING
SUBDS . 2 .AND 3 OF SECTION 550 :00 OF THE 1973
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS :
Section 1. Subds . 2 and 3 of Section 550 :00 of the 1973 Code of
Ordinances are amended to read as follows :
Subd. 2 . Water Rates . . Water bills shall be computed quarterly
at the following rates for water used as indicated by the meter
supplying each water service :
Commercial and Residential $ . 40 per hundred cubic
uses feet or any fraction thereof
Building Construction $. 55 per 1 ,000 gallons or
uses any fraction thereof
Subd. 3. Minimum Charges . A minimum charge of $4 . 00 per quarter
is hereby established for all premises served, to cover water
• pumpage , bookkeeping expenses , and meter rental. All water sold
shall be on the basis of meter readings except in the case of
minimum. charges ; provided, however, if deemed necessary , a flat
rate of not less than the minimum- charge may be established by
the Council.
Section 2 . This Ordinance shall take effect upon its publication.
First Reading: April 13 , 1982
Second Reading: April 27, 1982
Adopted:
Robert Sundland , Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol Johnson, City Clerk
Published in the St. Anthony Bulletin on
1982 .
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
--------------------------------------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
April 23, 1982 Resolution
X Ordinance Unfinished Business-2
Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Proposed
Other
April 27, 1982 Fence Ordinance
-----------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David Childs, City Manager
---------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: The P l ann i ng Commission has reviewed the fence
ordinance and recommends , in summary, the following:
1 : The maximum front yard height of a fence should be 4 feet and side and rear yard
height maximums should be 6 feet.
2. The fence should be set back from property lines a minimum of 6" when not
jointly owned or without permission of the abutting owner.
3. Height of a fence .should be measured from grade to prevent berming and building
a fence on top of that to gain additional height.
• FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Pass the proposed ordinance as presented.
2. Amend the proposed ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission , accepting
some or all of their suggestions.
3. Modify the proposal with your own ideas.
4. Decide not to pass any ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff sees merit in the proposal for a maximum height of 4 feet
in the front yard and 6 feet in the side and rear yards and the suggestion that
height be measured from grade of the lot. The Public Works Director/Assistant
Building Inspector prefers that the 6" setback from the property line not be
included.
CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
ORDINANCE 1982-003
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO FENCES; REQUIRING
BUILDING PERMITS ; REGULATING LOCATIONS ;
PROHIBITING CERTAIN FENCES; AMENDING THE
1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING A SECTION
THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter III of the 1973 Code of Ordinances is
amended to add a section to read as follows:
340 Fences.
340: 05 Building Permits Required. A building permit
shall be required for the construction or alteration of a
fence, and for any additions to a fence. The permit shall
be obtained in the name of the owner of the property on
which the fence is or will be located. Application shall
be made on forms provided by the City, and the applicant
shall provide the Building Inspector with a set of plans
and specifications for the fence. Permit fees shall be
paid in accordance with the Uniform Building Code.
340. 10 Requirements.
Subd. 1. Location. Any fence constructed or
altered after the effective date of
this ordinance shall be located
entirely upon the private property of
the owner to whom the building permit
was issued, and ownership of the permit
shall pass with ownership of the
property. The fence shall be set back
a distance from the owner ' s property
line sufficient to avoid encroachment
onto adjoining private or public
property or public right of way.
Subd. 2. Abutting Public Property. If a fence
is or is to be - adjacent to a street,
alley, public right of way or other
public property, the City may require
the applicant for the permit to locate
and mark the property line abutting the
public property by having a registered
surveyor place permanent survey pins or
stakes on the property line. If the
survey information is not available and
•
the applicant elects not to establish
• the property line by survey, the permit
shall not be issued unless the
applicant signs an affidavit stating
that the applicant is the owner of the
premises upon which the fence exists or
is to be located.
Subd. 3. No fence shall be over 6 feet in height.
Subd. 4. No fence along a public street shall be
constructed or altered so as to
visually obstruct the view from a
vehicle on that street of approaching
traffic on that street or another
.street.
Section 340: 15 Construction and Maintenance. Every fence
shall be constructed in a substantial manner and of
substantial material , reasonably suitable for the purpose
for which the fence is intended. Every fence shall be
maintained in a condition of reasonable repair and shall
not by reason of age, decay, accident, or otherwise, be
allowed to become or remain in a state of disrepair so as
to be or tend to be a nuisance to the injury of the public
or any abutting property. Any fence which is dangerous by
reason of its construction or state of disrepair or is
• otherwise injurious to public safety, health or welfare is
hereby declared to be a nuisance.
Section 340: 25 Prohibitions. It shall be unlawful for
any person to construct and maintain or allow to be
constructed or maintained upon any property located within
the limits of the City of St. Anthony any barbed wire
fence or any fence which is charged or connected with
electrical current in a manner as to transmit current to a
person or animal which might come in contact with the
fence.
Section 340: 30 Penalty. Violation of this Ordinance
shall be a penal offense and upon conviction thereof shall
be punishable as in this code provided for each such
offense. Each day that the violation is permitted to
exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
publication.
• -2-
First Reading: April 13 , 1982
• Second Reading: April 27 , 1982
Adopted:
Robert Sundland, Mayor
Attest:
Carol. B. Johnson, Clerk
Published in the St. Anthony Bulletin on ,
1982.
•
•
-3-
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
----------------------------------------------------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
April 23 , 1982 Ordinance Unfinished Business-3
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Craig Morris
Other
April 27 , 1982 Council action Letter of Credit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT In 1980, the City requ i red and received a
Letter of Credit to assure the landscaping and fencing components of Craig
Morris ' barber shop were accomplished. The original fencing was proposed to be
8 foot redwood. Last November, in response to Mr. Morris' request and in con-
sideration of input from his neighbor, Mr. Lee, the Letter of Credit was
extended to .May 1st and with the requirement of a chain link fence with slats.
Mr. Morris is now constructing a homemade wooden fence (which he feels satisfies
the requirement) . I have informed him this was not the agreement and advised
him to attend the Planning Commission and Council meetings. He did not attend
the Planning Commission meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES : Extend deadline.
RECOMMENDATION: Without further input from Mr. Morris , I see no alternative
but to cash in the Letter of Credit and contract to have a chain link fence with
slats constructed.
CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : Construction of a fence takes only
a day or so, hopefully, the parties will com-
plete it prior to May 1st. We have little
interest in cashing in if it can be avoided.
MEMORANDUM
DATE : April 16 , 1982
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: ---Craig-Morris - .Letter of Credit/Landscaping Conformance
-----------------------------------------
The Letter of Credit for $3 ,200 , issued to the City to assure
landscaping conformance , will expire May 1st.
There are two principal components in the landscaping plan. The one
is shrubbery. He did place some shrubbery around the area last
fall . They are small now and don ' t appear very healthy . He was also
to place shrubs along his northern lot line, but as a practical
matter, it was agreed last fall that nothing could be done there
• until the townhouse construction is completed.
The other component is the proposed fencing. The original plan was
for redwood fencing. However, last fall (.see attached minutes) the
agreement was for chain link fencing. On inspection of the site , I
note some partial wood construction, which apparently is supposed
to turn out to be fencing. This is not the agreement.
The option is simple. Cash in the Letter of Credit or give another
extension. He certainly has had his opportunity to comply with his
proposal and it will be up to him to make any case he has now.
For the sake of argument, I will note that the weather has not been
condusive to any fence building; Mr. Lee 's house construction
(on the adjoining lot-Penrod) has been going on and not completed;
if we cash in , we will have to put in the fence.
ROB/cjk
FIRST STATE BANK
of NEW BRIGHTON
- 2299 PALMER DRIVE
NEW BRIGHTON, MINN. 55112
PHONE: 612/636-4300
November 27, 1981
City of St. Anthony
St. Anthony, MN 55418
RE: IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 1091
AMENDMENT - EXTEND MATURITY DATE TO MAY 1, 1982
Gentlemen:
We hereby amend Letter of Credit No. 1091 in your favor for the
account of Gordon Hedlund, 1255 Pike Lake Drive, New Brighton,
Minnesota, up to the aggregate amount of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED
AND NO/100----------$3,200.00----------DOLLARS available by your
draft at sight.
• All drafts drawn must be marked "DRAWN UNDER LETTER OF CREDIT NO.
1091 DATED NOVEMBER 6, 1980. " Drafts must be presented to our
office at the First State Bank of New Brighton, 2299 Palmer Drive,
New Brighton, Minnesota, no later than 2:00 P.M. , St. Paul , Minnesota,
time on May 1, 1982, after this date this Letter of Credit will be
null and void.
We hereby agree with drawer, endorser_ and bonafide holders of drafts
under and in compliance with the terms ^f this Letter of Credit that
such drafts will be duly honored on due presentation.
To the extent not inconsistent with the express terms hereof, this
credit is subject to - the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary
Credit as issued by the International Chamber of Commerce, 1974.
Yours truly,
Wayne R. Burlingame
President
WRB/9p
CITY OF ST . ANTHON'
COUNCIL MINUTES
November 24 , 1981
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Haik at 7 : 30 P.M.
Present for roll call : Marks , Sundland , Haik , and Letourneau .
Absent: P.anallo.
Also present : David Childs , City Manager; Carol Johnson , Clerk/
Treasurer; Ron Berg , Administrative Assistant ;
Richard Enrooth , Planning Commission representative .
Motion by Councilman Sundland and seconded by Councilman Marks to
approve as submitted the minutes for the Council meeting held on
November 10 , 1Q981.
Motion carried unanimouslv .
Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Letourneau
to approve the following licenses : (1) Bill ' s Sheet Metal - heat-
ing; and, (2) Dick ' s Standard - starting and towing.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman P-]arks and se ,
seconded b�� Councilman Sundland to
approve payment of all verified claims listed in the November 24 ,
1981 Council agenda as well as $1 ,682 . 04 to Planning Design and
Research , Inc. and $1 ,730 . 26 to the Dorsey Law Firm.
Motion carried unanimously .
Richard Enrooth was present to update the Council on the November
17 , 1981 , Planning Commission meeting, including the Champion Auto
Store signage, the abandoned bus at Joe 's Service Station , and the
excess signage at the Red Owl Country Store at Apache .
He reported that the Sid Johnson variance request was tabled because
Mr. Johnson did not attend the meeting , apparently due to an
emergency.
Councilman Marks recommended that the Planning Commission begin to
look at sidewalk needs on major streets and the City policy for assessing
their cost. He also commended the Public Works Department on their
care of the City streets during the last storm, indicating MTC
bus drivers ' comments than St. Anthony had the only streets in the
Metro area so well taken care of.
Mr. Enrooth also reported that the sign ordinance revision is nearly
_complete and that at least one vacancy will be occurring on the
Planning Commission in January , 1982 .
-2-
motion by Councilman. Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Marks
to approve the third reading and adopt Ordinance 1981-011 .
ORDINANCE 1981-011
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATION ON
SEMI-PUBLIC PROPERTY: AMENDING SECTION 700 :00 ,
SUBD. 4 OF SECTION 710 : 00 , SECTION 715 : 00 AND
SECTION 1400 , OF THE 1973 CODE OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCES
Motion carried unanimously.
A letter from Mr. Craig Morris regarding his business on Silver Lake
Road was received as follows :
"City Council of St. Anthony:
In the spring of 1981 I was requested by the St. Anthony City
Council to construct a fence between the property of Craig & Company ,
and the adjacent residential lot directly in back of Craig & Company.
I am requesting an extension until Play 1 , 1982 for the following
reason :
Mr. Lee , the owner of the residential property concerned, has
requested the construction of a chain link fence with slats
inserted in the fence, as this would give us both complete
privacy.
At the present time , I am unable for reasons of weather condi-
tions and present personal financial status to construct such a
fence.
If I am given the proposed extension , I will agree to have a
fence constructed and ready for inspection by the above mentioned
date , May 1 , 1982 .
Since this type of fence is the request of the adjacent owner,
and I would like to be as agreeable as possible to all concerned
parties , I will appreciate any and ever consideration you can offer
me. "
After much deliberation a motion was made by Councilman Marks and
seconded by Councilman Sundland to grant an extension on the Letter
of Credit until May 1 , 1982 to Craig Morris for the installation
of a metal-slatted chain link fence and. shrubbery as shown on the
proposed site plan. The Letter of Credit shall be of an amount
sufficient to cover the cost of installing the chain link fence and
shrubbery and shall be submitted to the City Manager not later than
11 : 00 A.M. , Monday, November 30 , 1981. It is understood that Mr.
Ken Lee , adjacent property owner, is a party to this request and
that if the fence is not installed by May 1, 1982 , the City will
cash in the Letter of Credit and cause the work to be completed.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
-----------------------------------------------
. Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
April 23, 1982 Resolution Ordinance Unfinished Business-4
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Sen i or C i t i zens
Other
April 27, 1982 Highrise Proposal
----------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant
----------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: You are al 1 familiar with this proposal ,as
this was a "new" scaled down version, the Planning Commission technically heard
a request for three variances. The only new variance request was fog- unit sizes.
As you know, this was for the purposes of conforming to HUD guidelines. Other
points of discussion were the service entrance in the rear (access through a
residential district) and pedestrian access to the shopping center.
• FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES :
RECOMMENDATION Approve variances per recommendat i do of Planning Commission.
CITY MANAGER' S, REVIEW: COMMENTS :
MEMORANDUM
• DATE : April 16 , 1982
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Proposed Senior Building
---------------------------------------------------------------------
You are - all somewhat familiar with this proposal and it is again
outlined in the attached documents . We are technically looking at
three variances :
Allowed Proposed Variance
Building height 35 feet 372 feet 22 feet
Unit density/lot area 30 units 60 units 30 units
Unit floor area
Efficiency . 500 sq. ft. 415 sq . ft. 85 sq . ft.
One bedroom 650 sq. ft. 540 sq . ft. 110 sq. ft.
As shown in the attached Planning Commission minutes of January , 1980 ,
• building height and unit density. variances were approved. Technically ,
though, we must hear them again as this is a "new" proposal . I believe
it is clear the City looks favorably on the project and therefore the
variances are recommended, perhaps using the same reasons/rationale
as January , 19 80 .
Some concern as to unit sizes was expressed by Planning. Commission
members last month. The reason for these sizes is the Federation is
trying to adhere to HUD guidelines on this , i .e. , they recommend a
certain percentage of efficiency units and with that square footage .
The Senior Federation agrees the units should be larger and they have
been in contact with HUD officials , but for now the best proposal
to HUD would include those unit sizes . As the plan shows , if they
are allowed to build larger units , this can easily be accomplished by
building out the jog in the proposed building_. I recommend approval
of the variance request with comments on the City 's preference and
the desirability of larger units .
As for other matters of consideration , 80% opacity for screening via
landscaping is required and they have so proposed; the question of the
desirability of having a service entrance in the rear (access through
a residential area) ; the problem of providing pedestrian access across
to the shopping center. As for the latter, I have been in contact
with Sam Sivanich and he has his staff working on it. This is the
only way semaphores will be erected there , i .e . , by direction of
• the County Commission.
-2-
Finally, word on. this year's 202 program is out. There will be
18 million dollars available for Minnesota which should provide for
• 460 units , one-half of which are typically targeted for the Metro
area. Applications will be accepted through June.
ROB/cjk
•
•
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
-----------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
April 23 , 1982 Ordinance Unfinished Business-5
Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title
x Other
Skating Rink Study Co m
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT:
The following persons have agreed to serve on the Skating Rink Study Committee:
Roger Salsbury 3412 Highcrest 788-5076/Work 631-5518
Ron Hanson 2704 32nd Avenue 789-1325/Work 574-5000
Dick Timmer 3617 Belden Drive 781-6184/Work 830-5646
Larry Hamer Public Works Director
I feel that one councilman should also participate and hope someone will volunteer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES :
RECOMMENDATION:
Appoint committee as recommended.
Final committee report should be received by August 10, 1982.
CI Y MANAGER' S RErnVIEW: COMMENTS :
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
---------------------------------------------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
April 22. 1982 Ordinance New Business=l
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Purchase Request
Other
April 27, 1982 Municipal Liquor Store
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David Childs , City Manager
----------------------------------------------------- ..
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Ray Nelson , Liquor Operations Manager, has
been studying methods of promotion for the Liquor Operation. One area which has
gained tremendous popularity in on-sale businesses and which has proved very pro-
fitable is the installation of wide-screen television. The system would all'ow the
showing of sports events as well as movies and other items of interst (X-rated or
similar showings would be expressly prohibited) . Presently live music is used to
draw patrons at the cost of $350.00 per week. This would terminate with the addi -
tion of the video system.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the system is approximately 53 ,850 and based on a
savings of $350.00/week through the elimination of live music, the system should
pay for itself in 11 weeks. Thereafter the savings in music costs coupled with
expected better crowds should improve the profit picture substantially. Just the
elimination of the band will save $18,200 annually. The increase in crowds is
nearly impossible to predict, but a recent test of-the system at Liquor 111 brought
very positive results.
ALTERNATIVES :
1 . Continue present promotion with a band (status quo) .
2. Cut the band and add nothing (possibly with a loss in business) .
3. Add a wide-screen T.V. system, and drop the band.
4. Add a wide-screen T.V. system and drop the band, later adding a VCR or Beta-Max
type system to enhance capabilities.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends option A. A quote from Video Plus for a
Moss TV system with 6' screen was $3,800 ($375-$425 for installation) and a quote
from Digital Den for a Kloss TV system with 6' screen was $3,441 .45 ($300-$500 for
installation) .
Staff recommends awarding the bid to Digital Den with purchase of a VCR at a
later date.
CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
I ' 111
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
-----------------------------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
April 22, 1982 Ordinance New Business- 2
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Change Order -
Other
April 27, 1982 Well #4 Repair
---------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David Childs, City Manager
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: The- attached- memo describes the excessive cor-
rosion found in the well shafting and column pipes. The column pipes were not
expected to show as much corrosion as they did. We expected to replace the shaft
but comparing the life expectancy of stainless and carbon steel versus price, we
feel that the cost effective solution is to install stainless this time.
• FISCAL IMPACT: Additional costs above original plans are $4,518.00 for new
column pipes and $1 ,012.50 for the additional cost of stainless shafting over carbon
steel . -The repairs to the pump were about $1 ,800 to $2 ,000 less than expected but
the column pipes were not scheduled for replacement.
ALTERNATIVES :
1 . Replace the shafting with carbon steel (life expectancy 5 years) .
2. Replace the shafting with stainless steel (life expectancy nearly unlimited) .
3• Not replacing column pipe (life expectancy 2-5 years with risk of having column
drop into bottom if corrosion continues faster than expected) .
4. Replacing column pipe (life expectancy 10 .years to 15 years for the,,upper 115
feet and approximately. five- or. more years for the lower 65 feet) .
RECOMMENDATION: Replace 18' sections of column pipe at $4,518 and use stain-
less shafting to make necessary repairs at $1 ,012.50. The funds would come from the
water reserves and a motion is necessary to approve the changes.
CI;17Y MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 20 , 1982
• TO: Dave Childs , City Manager
FROM: Larry Hamer, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Well 44 Progress Report
---------------------------------------------------------------
Well #4 was pulled the week of April 1 , 1982 . There was a considerable
amount of corrosion on the column pipe and pump shafts . In the past,
the lower 65 feet of column and shafting (.which is in the water) cor-
rodes to a very large degree. When the well was pulled 5 years ago,
the City had to .replace this 65 feet of column and shaft. Fifteen
feet of, the shafting replaced 5 years .ago was stainless steel and
shows no signs of corrosion.
(.1) The well was measured and it was found that there is about 12 feet
of fill present. This would amount to about a yard of fill and is
not an appreciable amount at this time , removal of fill should be
planned for the next time the pump is pulled.
(2) The shafting appears to be in good condition , with the exception
of the bottom 50 feet. If this shaft is replaced with steel, as
we have in the past , the cost will be $835 . 50 . Installation of
50 feet of stainless steel shafting with couplings would cost
$1 , 854 . 00 , but would not be subject to corrosion. In other words ,
installing with stainless steel would mean an additional $1,012 .50
over and above the $835. 50 for steel, but would have a nearly
unlimited life expectancy.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend a change order to install stainless steel shafting in the
bottom 50 feet of Well #4 to prevent frequent replacement. -
(3) The column pipe was inspected on the site by a Layne Minnesota
representative and myself. The only section appearing to need
replacement at that time was the tail piece. After Layne removed
the column pipe from the location site to sandblast and recoat
it, I received a call from them informing me they found 18 ten foot
sections needing replacement. I then inspected the column my-
self and confirmed the deficiencies . The cost of the 18 ten
foot sections ,o s , with couplings , amounts to $4 , 518.00 .
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend a change order to replace the column pipe (couplings included)
for $4 , 518. 00 .
Total repair costs with both change orders approved* $13 ,262 . 50
• Total Repair costs without stainless steel shafting $ 7 ,727 . 50
and without replacement of 18 sections of column pipe
and couplings*
*less motor cost
LAYNE MINNESOTA COMPANY WATER WELLS
3147 California Street N.E. PUMPS
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 WATER TREATMENT
(612) 781-9553 FOUNDATION DRILLING
QUOTATION DATE Apri 1 19 , 19 82
TO: City of St . Anthony REFERENCE: We 1 1 #4
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony , MN 55418
SPECIFICATION
SECTION QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
PRICE
Pump Repairs egulre
1 Box packing . $ 20 .00
1 Stuffing box bushing 85 .00
1 1 5/8" S . S . drive shaft sleeve _ 120 . 00
1 8" x 5 ' bottom column pipe 162 .00
18 8" x 10 ' column pipe @ $ 190 . 00 each — 3, 420 .00
18 8" steel cowlings @ $61 . 00 each 1 ,098 . 00
22 1 7/16" rubber bearings @ $22 . 00 each 484 .00
6 1 112" rubber bearings @ $24 . 50 each 147 .00
1 8" bronze spider ( 112" ring ) 89 .00
6 1 112" couplings , steel Material @ $ 11 . 75 each 70 . 50
11 1 7/ 16" S . S . sleeves @ $34 . 50 each 379 . 50
5 1 1 /2" x 10 ' shafts with sleeves Steel material
@ $ 153 . 00 each 765 . 00
8 Bowl bushings @ $ 15 . 00 each 120 . 00
• 1 8RK bowl discharge adaptor 451 . 00
1 8" x 10 ' suction pipe 190 .00
Total Repairs using Carbon Steel
Shafts $ 7 , 601 .00
Stainless steel shaft material :
6 1 1 /2" stainless steel couplings @ $39 . 00 each $ 234 .00
5 1 1 /2" x 10 ' stainless steel shafts with stainless
steel sleeves @ $324 .00 each 1 , 620 .00
Total repairs using stainless steel shafts and
couplings . $ 8,617 . 50
Sandblast and apply coating on column pipe and
shafts . Lump Sum 4$ 1 , 895 .00
See standard conditions of sales on reverse side.
TERMS Net 30 Days SHIPMENT Immediate PRICE$ As Noted Above
SHIPPING DETAILS F . O . B. Job S i to
LAYNE MINNESOTA COMPANY
• Please sign and return copy when approved. By �7
ACCEPTED FOR THE PURCHASER 19 Title Treasurer
BY TITLE Page 1 of 1
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
-------------------------------------------------
Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
Apri 1 23, 1982 Ordinance New Business-3
Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Ordinance Amend-
--- Other ment to Allow Tanning
Aril 27, 1982 Salons as a Conditional
Use
---------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant
---------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: See Attached
• FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES : Return to Planning Commission for their recommendation on the
initiation of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment process.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend the City Counc i 1 give approva 1 to the i n i t i a t i o n of
the Zoning Ordinance Amendment process which would allow tanning salons as a con-
ditional permitted use. The process is as follows : (See Attached)
C Y MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : Recommend i n i t i a t i o n of Zoning
• G'I.YC Ordinance Amendment as recommended by staff.
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT:
We have had a request from a Mr. Keith Grewe to open a tanning salon in the basement of
Apache Plaza (,next to the bowling alley) . This is a relatively new concept whereby
people lie in a machine a couple times a week to attain a perpetual tan. Our Zoning
Ordinance permits "physical culture and health gyms, spas and clubs". 1 believe this
to be a legitimate operation and it is very close to fitting into that category.
However, the City Attorney has recommended, and I concur, that we take a strict and
conservative interpretation of this section thereby considering_ this proposal as a
non-permitted use under present Zoning guidelines. The City Attorney, has recommended
we amend the ordinance to allow the operation as a conditional use. This would allow
the City to monitor these types of requests on a case by case basis and is placing
appropriate conditions to assure the operations are. not a front for a less desirous
enterprise.
Initiation of Zoning Ordinance Amendments can be by a recommendation of the Planning
Commission orby action of the Council . At their last meeting , the Planning Commission
denied the request to hear this proposal as an addendum to the agenda, feeling the
need for public input on this matter. However, there are two public hearings built
into this process (see Recommendati(on) which 1 feel is sufficient for public input.
The request and action for Tuesday's meeting is to initiate the Zoning Ordinance
Amendment process.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RECOMMENDATION (continued) :
1 . April 29th, required publication stating public hearing will be May 11th to
consider- this Zoning Amendment.
2. May 11th, public hearing and first reading of Ordinance Amendment.
3. May 18th, Planning Commission input re: Ordinance Amendment. A public hearing
is possible to consider the proposer's application for a conditional use per-
mit (publication and notice required) . Although this cannot be approved until
the Amendment is "on the books", it can coincide with the Ordinance Amendment
process .
4. May 25th, Council meeting.
Option a - approve second reading and table proposer's conditional use application.
Option b - approve second reading, waive 3rd reading and thereby approve the
Amendment. The Council could then hear the proposer's conditional use
application and approve that.
•
ST ANTHONY A/"P CHECK .REGI.S,TER DAT.E. .03-3.1-82
CHECK":' VENDOR. j.f: AMOUNT
0.1655 A,MERI'.0-A N. LINEN SUP!P,L-. _ 5=71..46
01656 CAPITOL CITY DI'STR:I.B 515.80
0.1657. CHR,-I STELA TRUCKING IN 166.98
01658 EAST SIDE. BEVERAGE" C 189034. 20
01659 GANZER DISTRIBUTORS 89202.35
01660 GENERAL PARTS C SUPP 47.50
01661 GOLD EAGLE: ;DT-ST CO 230. 50
01662 GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE, 2-11.65
01663 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP C 76. 10
01664 HOME JUICE CO 30.72
01665 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING 14.906.88
01666 LYSTADS 63. 33
01667 MARK VII- SALES INC 5.530. 34
• . 01668 MELS VAN-O-LITE 177. 30
01669 MIDWEST WINE CO 19048. 36
01670 OLD DUTCH FOODS "INC 236.00
01671 PEPS I' COLA/7 UP BOTT 685.05
.01672 PIONEER DETECTIVE AG 203. 15
01673 REX DISTRIBUTING CC 12 .328. 72
01674 ROYAL BEVERAGE, DIST 400. 35
01675 STUART DISTRIBUTING 322.80
01676 TOMBSTONE PIZZA 138. 10
01677 MINN FIRE INC 41.50
FINAL TOTAL 649169. 14 #
:. S_T.�.ANTHONY . A/? CHECK RE.GI STE.R DATE 03-31
st CHECK
VENDOR AMOUNT
I2TL7 RAY NEL'.SON 110.00
. .12:71.8 DEANE LECLAIRE 75.00
w- 12719 APACHE PLAZA 19561.78
r
12720 BLUE CROSS 372.92
12721 CENTURY SIGN 122.00
12722 EAGLE WINE 1 .483.01
12723 GRI.GGS COOPER 59696.74
12724 GROUP HEALTH' PLAN 4.5.45
1272.5 EVELYN HETZER CO 700.00
12726 INTERCONTINENTAL 529.85
12727 JOHNSON WINE 383.88
12728 NO STATES POWER 458.98
12729 NW BELL 27. 14
. 12730 EPSCO 19845.36
1.2731 PHYSICIANS HEALTH 861.81
127.32 RAILROD OFFER 16.95
12733 S/A LIQUOR #1 15.000.00
12734 S/A LIQ 91 PETTY CSH 87.47
12735 S/A LIQUOR 42 59000.00
12736 TS8 COMPUTER CTR 175.00
12737 UPTOWN .175.00
12738 WESTERN LIFE INS 30.80
12739 ALEX E ALEX INC 59696.50
12740 S/A LIQUOR 11 209000.00
12741 S/A LIQUOR 92 51000.00
12742 UPTOWN 175.00
• 12743 AETNA LIFE 288.00
ST ANTHONY A/P CHECK REGISTER DATE 03-31-82
CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT
• 12744 _ AMEJR BANKERS INS 26.00
12745 CITY/CTY CR UNION 419.00
12746 COMM OF REVENUE 19436.22
12747 GRIGGS COOPER 12,563.74
12748 JOHNSON MINE 19526.48
12749 MINN BENEFIT ASSN 8.30
12750 MINN DISTILLERS 19250.20
12751 EPSCO 39738.83
12752 PUBLIC EMPL RETIRMNT 19521.55
12753 QUALITY WINE CO 19586.66
12754 S/A NATL BANK 1,939.37
12755 ST TREAS SS CONTR FD 29293.76
12756 TWIN CITY FEDERAL 20.00
. 12757 DAIN BOSWORTH INC 259000.00
12758 CAPITOL DIST CO 551.05
12759 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 39709.44
12760 EAGLE WINE CO 1 ,112.46
12761 GRIGGS COOPER E CO 59434.70
12762 INTERCONTINENTAL PKG 1 , 714.22
12763 OLD PEORIA CO 688.97
12764 EPSCO 1 ,664. 31
12765 S/A LIQUOR 41 209000.00
12766 S/A LIQUOR #2 59000.00
12767 S/A LIQ 92 PETTY CSH 70.73
12768 TSB COMPUTER GTR 175.00
12769 TOMBSTONE PIZZA 106. 10
• 12770 TWIN CITY WINE CO 29891.09
(c;7-�
ST ANTHONY A/P CHECK REGISTER DATE: 03-31-82
CHECK VENDOR ' AMOUNT
1.2.771 - UPTOWN _ 175.00
-127.72. COMM OF REVENUE
12773 S/A LIQUOR- #I 209000.00
12774- S/A LIQUOR #2 5,000.00
12775 S/A NATL BANK 19786.72
12776 EPSCO 694.15
1.27.77 FORS_YTHE APPRAISALS 875.00
12778 OLD PEORIA CD 100.00-
12779 GRIGGS COOPER E CO 543.57
12780 EVELYN HETZER CO 700.00
12781 INTERCONTINENTAL PKG 2 ,047.62
12782 JOHNSON WINE CO 2086. 02
12783 MAPLE GROV HTG 443.29
• 12784 MIDWEST ANTENNA SYS 210.00
12785 MINNEGASCO 647. 72
12786 MINN DISTILLERS 3 ,055. 70
12787 EPSCO 19196.09
12788 PUB- EMP RETIREMENT 1 ,572. 35
12789 QUALITY WINE 176.56
12790 S/A LIQ #1 PETTY CSH 97. 30
12791 STANS DOOR SVC 244.83
12792 ZUHRAH SHIRNE CIRCUS 150.00
12793 DIANE LECLAIRE 75.00
12794 RAYMOND, NFLSON 110.00
12798 S/A LIQ #2 PETTY CSH 44. 16
FINAL TOTAL 213, 514.99 #
•
ST ANTHONY k1 61 L4-0(L. A/P CHECK QFGISTER )ATE 04-21-8
CHECK V N1)QR AMOUNT
01618 AETNA LIFF & CASUALT 438.00
• 01619 BELLBOY CORP 19355.40
01680 0; 1 T COU'dTY C R E D I T U ;99.00
01681 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 610.20
01682 COMMERCIAL REPAIR SE 58. 30
01683 DALCO I JC 67. 19
01684 GR I(.',GS COOPER & CO I 71483.42
0 163 5 JOHNS04 WINE CO 4:)9. 6
01686 '-IAG I C G MI-N 36.00
01687 MAPLE GROVE HTG CC 2 , 147.82
01688 f-lIDl-Jl=Sr WINE CO 1 . 189.315
01689 MlAfl BAR SUPPLY 540.42
01690 VINN DISTILLERS INC 3 , J4'4.6;?
016-) l IMHVIE F,aCT S /4 9
01692 i'JORTHERA STAPES P(,'WE
1 , 7. 59. 29
016)3 OLD -PEORIA CO INC 66.3. 1.8
011694 EPS":0 644.20
01695 QUALITY WINE CO * 006.41
01696 ST ANTHONY LIQUOR '11 20, 000.00
016'17 ST 4NTHO)FJY LIU 41 97.80
01698 ST A"JTHONY LIQUOR 02 5 ,000.00
016'41) S I LE!'JT Kt V I GHT 39.00
01 7001 SUNDERLAND INC 9T4.00
0 170 1 TSU COMPUTER SERVICE 295.00
U17 2 T141`I CITY FEDERAL 20.00
01703 TWIA CI1Y FILTER SER 17.311
• 01 704 U N I TED b-JAY 2.00
0)
l�
ST ANfHCNY L- )Q}IkOf- A/P CHF_C.K. RFsISrER LATE 04-22-P
CNEt, K VENDOR AMC)W"'T
01705 LILLIF_ SUE! NEWSPAPER 110.0 )
01706 RADIt.) SHACK 12.21
0 170 7 STEAK KNIVES 165.00
01708 'NELSON EN1ERNR [ SFS 6.60
01709 CAVINE COURIER 77.50
F I NAL TU1'AL
89204. 15
•
Ca�