HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 07261983 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
100487
Box: 16
Folder: CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
Document: CC PACKET 07261983
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
COUNCIL AGENDA*
August 23, 1983
7: 30 P.M.
Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance. ' ; 36
�_�. Roll Call. GU P_
C. Approval of August 9 , 1983 Council Minutes .—
D. Licenses/Permits/Petitions .
E. Presentation of Claims .
- 1. Dorsey & Whitney - $745 .00 .
-- 2. Dorsey & Whitney - $360 . 00 .
- 3 . Edward J. Hance - $1 ,528 . 35 .
-4 . Adrian Helgeson and Company - $3, 000 .00 .
F. Reports .
lam• Planning Commission Minutes - August 16 , 19,83. -
a. Zantigo Sign Request.
(Ja-"' Twin City Federal Sign Request.- Ja_�_ 4j-lu
tie: Elmwood Lutheran Church Conditional U e Permit Request. ;o��,�
Council. /'/ O , a-rnrq ,
Mayor Sundland - Councilman Marks "
[,b�_ Councilman Enrooth- . e. Councilman Rana llo- 11, i
�! Councilman Letourneau_
'�3_�- Departments/Commissions .
l Letter from Adrian Helgeson and Company, re: 1982 Audit
� Report.
City Manager.
Minnesota Waste Management Board Agenda - August 24-25 , 1983.
// � Staff Meeting. Notes August 16 , 1983.
k5o�Public Hearings .
-: New Business . /►
LTOilUnfinished Business .
[Adjournment.
II.R.A. .II-IIIEDIATELY FOLLOUI-1IG
n,EGULAR CO U_4CIL'T_1EETI=IG. 1 .
CITY' OF ST. ANTHONY
• COUNCIL AGENDA
August 23, 1983
7 : 30 P.M.
A. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance .
B. Roll Call.
C. Approval of August 9 , 1983 Council Minutes .
D. Licenses/Permits/Petitions .
E. Presentation of Claims .
_1.. _ Dorsey &. Whitney - $745.00 ..
2 . Dorsey & Whitney - $360 . 00 .
3 . Edward J. Hance - $1 ,528 . 35 .
4 . Adrian Helgeson and Company - $3, 000 .00 .
F. Reports .
1. Planning Commission Minutes - August 16 , 1983.
a. Zantigo Sign Request.
b. Twin City Federal Sign Request.
C. Elmwood Lutheran Church Conditional Use Permit Request.
2. Council .
a. Mayor Sundland d. Councilman Marks
b. Councilman Enrooth e. Councilman Ranallo
C. Councilman Letourneau
3. Departments/Commissions .
a. Letter from Adrian Helgeson and Company, re : 1982 Audit
Report.
4 . City Manager.
a. Minnesota Waste Management Board Agenda - August 24-25 , 1983.
b . Staff Meeting Notes August 16 , 1983.
G. Public Hearings .
H. New Business .
I. Unfinished Business .
J. Adjournment.
AN
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
COUNCIL MINUTES
August 9 , 1983
The meeting was opened at 7: 30 P .M. with the Pledge of Allegiance led
by Mayor Sundland.
Present for roll call : Ranallo, Sundland, and Letourneau.
Absent: Marks and Enrooth .
Also present: David Childs , City Manager.
Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to
approve as submitted the minutes for the Council meeting held July
26 , 1983.
Motion carried unanimously .
The clean-up deposit fee for the 49 'ers softball tournament had been
paid for only one of the dates specified for that event and the Manager
indicated he would take the steps necessary to assure a satisfactory
clean up.
Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Mayor Sundland to grant
the following licenses and permits as listed in the August 9 , 1983
Council agenda:
Heating licenses - Cronstroms Heating .and A-ir Conditioning.
Riccar Heating and Air Conditioning .
Cigarette and juke box licenses - The Alternative , Robert Slick, owner .
Temporary 3 . 2 beer licenses - (consumption, not sale) Carole Fierke,
2829 Anthony Lane South, for Local #49
softball game and picnic to be held at
Silver Point Park from 5 : 30 P .M. until
dusk, August 10 and 29 , 1983.
Barb Wood-Hill, 3004 - 31st Avenue N.E. ,
for use of Central Park and pavillion
for softball from 3 :00 P .M. until dark,
August 26 , 1983 .
.Temporary 3. 2 beer license - ' St. Charles Women's Club for annual steak
fry to be held on church property at
2.420 St. Anthony Boulevard the evening
of September 9 , 1983 , and waiving the
fees .
• Motion -carried unanimously .
-2-
Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to •
approve payment of all verified claims listed for August 9 , 1983 in
the Council agenda of the same date.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by ,Councilman Ranallo and seconded by .Councilman Letourneau to
approve payment of $1,969 .50 to the Layne Minnesota Company for
emergency repairs on Well #4 .
Motion carried unanimously .
Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to
approve payment of second installment premiums of $1, 172 . 50 , $3, 150 ,
and $2 ,930 to Midwest Area, Inc. for insurance coverage as presented
in the August 9 , 1983 Council agenda.
Motion carried unanimously .
During the past few years the City residents have registered complaints
with the Council about what they perceive to be an increase in the
number of planes taking off over the City each day . Mayor Sundland
had written a letter to the Metropolitan Airport Commission expressing
these concerns and indicated one resident, John Dotolo, 2616 West
Armour Terrace, had recently called him to report he had counted,- 44
low-flying planes over his home one Sunday . The resident also indi-
cated he had received a very unsatisfactory response when he made •
this complaint to an airport official. It was agreed that another .
letter, signed by all five Council members , should be directed to the
eight Commissioners of the Metro Airport Commission to make them aware
that the Council is receiving complaints from their constituents about
the extent of air traffic over St. Anthony and to request the Commis-
sion to see what they could do to divert some of the traffic away from
this area.
The July Fire Department report and liquor operations summary and the
August 2nd staff notes were accepted as informational as was the six
month investment report.
The Metropolitan Council intends to follow up their August 2nd pre-
sentation by developing a work program for the City 's capital improve-
ment plan , according to Mr. Childs , who said this work program would
be presented for Council consideration in September .
The Manager indicated the budget transfers he recommended in Resolution
83-039 would reflect the actual salary and fringe payments expendi-
tures- made in 1983 and would not create a deficit in the 1983 Budget.
Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to
adopt Resolution 83-039 .
RESOLUTION ' 83-039 •
A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE 1983 BUDGET
Motion .carried unanimously.
AJA
j
-3-
3
• Motion by Mayor- Sundland and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to
a
adjourn the meeting at 7: 50 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously.
4
Respectfully submitted,
t
Helen Crowe, Secretary
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
• Date :Submitted . . Type of Action Requested . . Agenda Item Number
Resolution
August 1'9, 1983 Ordinance Licenses/Permits
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title L.i censes/Permits
Other
August 23. 1983 for Council Approval
------------------------------------------------------------------------ .
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: Lila Johnson, License/Billing Clerk
SUMMARY DISCUSSI"ON OF SUBJECT
Heating Licenses 3.2 Beer Permit (not to sell )
Prestige Heating & .Air Conditioning Wanda Wagner family reunion picnic
T.G.S. Mech. , Minnetonka, MN August 23, Central Park
Amusement Devices
National Amusement Co. , Inc. for
Snyder Bros . (deposit for next available license)
• FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES :
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
HEATING LICENSE APPLICA'T'ION
Otatt of Anntoota, CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE REg.
RR.
County of... HENNEP.IN/RAMSEY.„.......,... July 1, 1983 to July 1, 1984
i • CITY UNCIL QTY
TOTHE................................CO.........................................................................OF THE............................................................................
............................_
' or...............ST. ANTHONY .......................IX S.4ID COUNTY AND ST.?TE:
........................................................................................
` The undersijned hereby applies for a license to carry on the business of................................................................
................HEATI.NG...Wll R .....................................at........VARIOUS...LOCATIONS.................................................................................
in the....................CITY................................of...... ..........................................in said county and state for the
term of.........ONE...Y EAR........................................from the date hereof, subject to the laws of Minnesota and the
ordinances of said.......... ITY,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and herewith tenders j....1,5.00 .,,,as the license
feetherefore......................................................................................................................................... ....................................
.... ... ......................................
.
l:t�#�..c,.a.......�f..e.� f.an..k�....3.......t-1.. . ...........
ADDRESS:.:...7.r�'L�0.........m..6i i.i,iJ........ :.........t�1....E._
.................................................................................
....................PHONE....N.O......SS. :.. -?.: .......................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................I......
..............................
............. . ......
_....................................................................'.._...........................................
........... .. ....... ............................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................
............ ....... ....... ............................................................. ........................................................................................................
.................................................
Dated �f 19. X S.. _ .......... ... ......_...................
A 1500;Y'
;1\515 ( - &0 — - - - --- --- --
r
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
American Family Mutual Insurance Company .
NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY
PEDERSON AGENCY THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE IS ISSUED AS A MATTES
1055 E. WAYZATA BLVD OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE
WAYZATA, MN 55391 CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED
• PRESTIGE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, INC. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND
7800 MAIN STREET N.E. OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY ANY POLICY LISTED
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BELOW.
This is to certify that policies of insurance listed below have been issued to the insured named above and are in force at this time.
KIND OF POLICY POLICY EXPIRATION DATE LIMITS OF LIABILITY
INSURANCE NUMBER (MO., DAY,YEAR)
WORKERS'COMPENSATION UNTIL Statutory
AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY 22X 09328 CANCELED MN $ 100,000 EACH ACCIDENT
EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE
BUSINESS OWNERS' Bodily Injury and
LIABILITY Property Damage
(Combined) $ ,000 $ ,000
GENERAL LIABILITY Bodily Injury $ ,000 $ ,000 t
®Comprehensive General Liability
IneludlnG products/completed 22X 09328 UNTIL
operatidns CANCELED Property Damage $ .000 $ .00
❑Comprehensive General Liability
excludipaa products/completed
operat Ens
Bodily Injury and
❑Manufacturers'8 Contractors Liability Property Damage $ 500,000 $ 500 ,000 t$
❑Owners'.Landlords'8 Tenants' (Combined)
Liability
® NON OWNED t Applies to Products/Completed Operations Hazards.
❑ AUTOMOBILE #BI Aggregate not applicable to M 8 C or OL 8 T.,
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Bodily Injury
❑Owned(Basic Form) (Each Person) $ ,000
Hired
Non-owned Bodily Injury
(Each Occurrence) $ ,000
❑Comprehensive Form Property Damage $ ,000 IE
- i
COMMERCIAL UMBRELLA
Bodily Injury and
Property Damage $ ,000 $ ,000
(Combined) t
OTHER
i
Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the undersigned company will endeavor to give
*( days) written notice to-the below named Certificate Holder, but failure to give such notice shall impose no obligation Or liability of*any kind
upon the company.
* 10 days unless different number of days shown
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER
DATE ISSUED: AUGUST 17, 10
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
3301 SILVER LAKE RD American Family AAutual Insurance CO. GL
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Q1 i�� ✓�
GINAL COPY �ICL-11781 Ed 2/83
ORI
HEATING LICENSE APPLICATION
otate of Ininntota 0 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE REg-
1&a.
Cutfnty of HENN EP I N/W�LMS�EY..... ......... July 1, 1983 to July 1, 1984
aTY COUNCIL aTY
TOTHE..........................................................:............................................ OF TH4..................................................................................
.....................
OF ST. ANTHONY X Sd1D CO UXTr .4XD STATE:
.................................I.............I..................................................................................................................I
The undersigned hereby applies for a license to carry on the business of................................................................
................HEATI.NG...W11=....................................at........VARIQUS...LOCATIONS.................................................................................
in the........ .........CITY................................01.....ST-..ANTHDNY..........................................in said county and state for the
term of.........ONE...YEAR........................................from the date hereof, subject to the laws of Minnesota and the
ordinances of said.........CITY IPITY...................... ........................; and herewith tenders I.....1.5...1-0.0...................-as the license
feetherefore... ................ .. . ................ .................................................... ...__......... ...................................................................
.........................
.. . ......... ..... .......................... ........... ..................... .
cbm ...NAME...... ..... ............-I. .........
. .. . .. ............... ..................I..... .... ........I<z�*,���,l�.,.,4..,.*.,.,.,-.,.,)..I................11.......
.. .. .. ADDRESS... ... .. ......3.7.... ..... ....
.... ... ... . . ... .. ..................... .. ............ ...... ....... ..............OPPICERS*...STGNATUREi......;" .4
.......... .... . .... ... . . .......I................. .. ......... ....... .......................................................--.... ...................ft=4
............ ... .. .. . ...... .... ...... ... .. . ......... .............-....I........PHONE....NO......... .......................... .. ...........
......... .-.... ... ... ................................ -........... ...... .......... ..............-.............................. .........................................--......
... ... .......... ---....... ............ ........' '.............. ........ . ....I............................................................... ..... ....- ............
.... .. .... .. . ...... .-........... . ........... .... ........ I .........................................................................................................
............... . ............
. .. ............ ....... ... ... . . ....... .... ......-........ ........................... ...... .. ..........
............... ..... ................. .................................. .... ......................... ....... ......... . ... ............................... ....
. .............. .
W5 p5t"'I,u 9 z , f 19 ...... ..... .... . .. . ....
,8
80D 5.0 0 cK
Qxcora
NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY
Preserve Insurance Agency COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES
14950 Martin Drive •
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 LETTER A Lakeland Fire & Casualty
COMPANY
LETTER
NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED COMPAW Thomas G. Shandley LETTER C
TGS Mechanical
P.O. Box 1123 LnERNY D
Minnetonka, MN 55343 COMPANY
LETTER
This is to certify that policies of insurance listed below have been issued to the insured named above and are in force at this time. Notwithstanding any requirement,term or condition
of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain,the insurance afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all
the
terms,exclusions and conditions of such policies.
COMPANY TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY
Limits of Liability in Thousands
LETTER EXPIRATION DATE EACH
OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE
GENERAL LIABILITY
BODILY INJURY 8 S
❑COMPREHENSIVE FORM
❑PREMISES-OPERATIONS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ 8
❑ EXPLOSION AND COLLAPSE
HAZARD
❑ UNDERGROUND HAZARD p O
® PRODUCTS/COMPLETED GLA 16 18 70 10-28-83
OPERATIONS HAZARD
BODILY INJURY AND
❑CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE PROPERTY DAMAGE 8 $
❑ BROAD FORM PROPERTY COMBINED 350, 350,
DAMAGE
❑ INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
❑ PERSONAL INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY $
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY INJURY $
(EACH PERSON)
❑ COMPREHENSIVE FORM BODILY INJURY $
❑ OWNED (EACH ACCIDENT)
❑ HIRED PROPERTY DAMAGE $
ElBODILY INJURY AND
NON-OWNED BODILY
DAMAGE $
COMBINED
EXCESS LIABILITY
BODILY INJURY AND
❑ UMBRELLA FORM
PROPERTY DAMAGE 8 8
❑ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA COMBINED
FORM
WORKERS'COMPENSATION STATUTORY
and
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $
(EACH ACCIDENT)
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES
Cancellation: Should any of the above des5ribed policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing com-
pany will endeavor to mail U days written notice to the below named certificate holder, but failure to
mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER: 8-19-83
City of St. Anthony DATE ISSUED:
3301 Silver Lake Rd.
St. Anthony, MN �Cm,.Jq X,4,dA)
AUTHORI2 REPRESENTATIVE
To y From z,
All-
--
■ LG� Cam_ ■
Subject pp 1
Date Signed
WilsonJones
cyan_+e oa 1,•K •Hr 882
6 Ima.atiinreo 1%u s A
P' . )41193 A U 0 8 8 0 A 25.00GK
btate of A1111e50ta, AMUSEMENT DEVICES
HENNEPIN
$25. 00 per device
('orrndJ of `• �
3/15/83 to 3/15/84
71O THE CITY COUNCIL
OF T!/E... ._ ...... . ..._CITY
ST. ANTHONY _ _............. ....l.v SJID (.'017371' ST.•!TE:
T/rr rrnr/rrxidrrer/ for rt /if-ensr to curry on the l,rtsinexx of.
AMUSEMENT DEVICES
in the CITY ST.. .ANTHONY.... .. ........... ...... . ...in said Bounty and state for the
' - r'f. ..
term o ONE YEAR Jr f, sttl,jrrt to the luny of.tilinnesotu and the
f ant thr slate herro
ordi,tdl,rr•r'.'r of xuirl, CITY rr►Ld herrrr'ilh tenders j....,.. u e
s tile lir ►r.ve
2.5....00.... ....
fer t h errfore
.. ....... .......... . ................................
LIST MACHINES LICENSES: •....•'... .•"...... ...
COMPANY NAME: u r� llnr�a• LCo
/ G Can
r
r ..................ADDRESS ,�Y.-?X...... / 'c....... .
i .3..1- ... .. ..... ..:.
PHONE..__ ..... ..a2.... . . ... sz/.Z�
.. . ...... OFFICERS SIGNATURE:
p
IN
....
-
2 5,O OCK
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 282
Community Servicee Department
3301 Silver Lake Rd • St. Anthony, MN 55418 0 Phone: 781-5021
Facilities Reservation Form Permit No.
Name / ��^' �'-' � Home Phone Bus. Phone
Addres -3 "��' Date -iF-
Name of Group or anilation
Intended Use. . �� v
Date(s) wanted - -a Day(g) Su T W Th F Sa (circle)
Building:
High School Auditorium
Park View Community Center Cafeteria
Wilshire P?rk Elem.,Scho Classrooms) #
Other T� ? ,� �( d :-o f, Gymnasium (If High School, circle one
OLD NEW )
Kitchen
Other / 1
Doors to open am pm Expected attendance:
Activity begins --am _ pm Admission: --Free Charge
Activity ends am pm Will merchandise be sold?
• Special arrangements needed (chairs, cooks. AV equipment. etc.):
I hereby certify that I am an agent of the above named group or organization and am authorized to accept in their
name the responsibility for observance of the rules and regulations of the Board of Education, Independent.School
District #282. As a group or organizational agent, I will attend this function,and I will be solely responsible forgiving
any and all instructions to the custodians or other support personnel. Presentation of this permit to the custodian on
duty is necessary for admittance for the initial date. In accepting this arrangement, rentee agrees to hold harmless
I.S.D. 282 and its representatives from all claims incurred in use of the facility. Rentee waives all rights and claims for
potential damages incurred in this rental arrarigement. L `�
(signature of responsibl ' rson)
Bill to:
(name) (address),
---------------------------------------------FOR OFFIC USE ONLY--------------------------�_-_
Class .45-- Ins Approved by - Date
Charges:.Rental _:22 ��_ Custodial
• Cooks:' Other charges:
Note:
WHITE—CommuMtr 0_4me.o"Ie.�� �, .p.,, .I�0041 IprR,—CwebdIll"COPY GOLD— Apojc4knr.Copy
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
DEPARTMENT -OF LICENSING/PERMITS
The following is application 'for use of liquors, including non-toxicating malt -
liquor (3.2 Beer) in City parks.
FULL NAME OF APPLICANT
ADDRESS
AGE
certify that 1 am a resident of St. Anthony/or work in City of St. Anthony.
a responsible for conduct of his/her group.
Signature of appl is cot
NAME OF GROUP
$50.00 NO.
Cleanup Deposit
PARK LOCATION
Received by; �-�-��
Mr. David M. Childs
City Manager
City of -St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road August 2 19 83
• Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418
IN ACCOUNT WITH
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(INTERNAL REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. 41-0223337)
IN RE: City of St. Anthony
(A separate Disbursement Statement is or will be rendered for our disbursements, if any, for your account.)
To legal services rendered from May 1, 1983 Amount
through May 31, 1983
• Attend May 10 Council Meeting $ 35 .00
Attend May 24 Council Meeting 130 . 00
Review of agenda matters and general preparation
for meetings, including research, review of
documents, correspondence and telephone calls
and advice to manager and staff regarding
Chick ' s litigation, Walbon back taxes and
information for auditors 580 .00
Total Fees $745 .00
WRS:ln
•
Payment due within 10 days of receipt of statement.
Disbursements made for your account, for which bills have not yet been received will appear on a later statement.
Mr. David M. Childs
City Manager
City of St. Anthony August 2 19 83
3301 Silver Lake Road
• Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418
IN ACCOUNT WITH
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(INTERNAL REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. 41-0223337)
IN RE: City of St. Anthony
(A separate Disbursement Statement is or will be rendered for our disbursements, if any, for your account.)
To legal services rendered from June 1, 1983 Ambunt
through June 30, 1983
• Review of agenda matters and neral preparation for
g P P
meetings, including research, review of documents,
correspondence and telephone calls and advice to
manager and staff regarding information to auditors,
conditional use permit questions, and Minnegasco
Franchise
Total Fees $357 .50
Plus disbursements per
attached statement 3 .20
Total Fees & Disbursements $360 .70
WRS: ln
•
Payment due within 10 days of receipt of statement.
Disbursements made for your account, for which bills have not yet been received will appear on a later statement.
LAW OFFICES STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT
EDWARD J. HANCE
• SAINT ANTHONY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING,SUITE 200 DATE. August 17 , 1983
2401 LOWRY AVENUE NORTHEAST
MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55418
City of St. Anthony PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN THIS
c/o David Childs, City Administrator PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE.
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
AMOUNT REMITTED $
Prosecutions: July, 1983
-------_--_.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE DESCRIPTION s $
PAYMENTS
CREDITS& ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENTS
• UNPAID PREVIOUS BALANCE
FINANCE CHARGE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $1 ,500 . 00
COSTS INCURRED:
Transcript of Joey Abrahamson $15 .00
Copying Costs 13 . 35 28 . 35
CURRENT FEES
$ 1,528 . 35
MINIM UM PAYMENT DUE $.
Accounts due upon presentment of statement. A FINANCE CHARGE at a periodic rate of 11/3% per month,equaling an AN-
NUAL PERCENTAGE RATE of 16% will be imposed upon any Unpaid Previous Balance greater than $1.00, with a minimum
FINANCE CHARGE of$0.50. The FINANCE CHARGE is applied to the outstanding balance at the end of each billing cycle, if
the balance for that billing cycle was not paid in full within 30 days.
NOTICE:See reverse side for important information.
ADRIAN
HELGESUI if iL
• AND COMPANY
Certified Public Accountants
3710 IDS Center
80 South 8th Street
Minneapolis,MN 55402
(612)341-3030
July 31, 1983
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED
Audit of financial statements of all
funds of City of St. Anthony for the
year ended December 31, 1982 $9,200.00
Less Progress Billing 6,200.00
$3,000.00
•
- s
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 16 , 1983
The meeting was called to order by Chair Makowske at 7: 35 P .M.
Present for roll call : Zawislak, Bowerman, Makowske, Bjorklund,
Wagner, and Jones .
Absent: Franzese .
Also present: David Childs , City Manager; and Jerry Gilligan, Acting
City Attorney .
An omission in the July 19th minutes was corrected a's follows :
Page 1, para. 2 : Add Commissioner Jones ' name to, those in attendance.
Motion by Commissioner Bowerman and seconded by Commissioner Jones to
approve as amended the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
held July 19 , 1983 .
Motion carried unanimously .
Mr. Gilligan, who was sitting in for William Soth, was introduced to
• the Commissioners . The Commission will be represented by Chair
Makowske at the next Council meeting , August 23rd. .
At 7: 36 P .M. , the public hearing on the Elmwood Lutheran Church con-
ditional use' permit request was continued with approximately 20
interested -persons in attendance:
Dick Jones , 5157 - 6th Street N.E. , who said he was representing the
church as a trustee, read his prepared statement reporting on the
meeting August 4th between church officials and six neighbors to the
south of the church property at which five alternatives to the proposal
submitted 'July 19th were explored. , In his statement, Mr. Jones cited
the various reasons the building committee had for not constructing
the addition in any other way than they had originally proposed ,
including the architect' s advice that several suggestions might be
structurally unsound and the fact that with all other alternate plans
the additional restrooms and kitchen expansion would not provide the
seating in the sanctuary would be reduced from the number proposed
with the addition of a fellowship hall . Mr. Jones further contended
that when the building permit for the existing building was issued
in 1964 , tacit approval was given for the proposal as presented
July 19th as well as for the future construction of a new sanctuary
when the congregation can afford it.
Mr. Jones reported the ardhitect 'Could not be present that 'evening'
because -he was on vacation and would probably not be back- before the
• August 23rd Council meeting. He added that the minutes of the meeting
July 20, 1964 at which the Council had approved the building permit
for the existing building had been found in the City files , but the
-2-
Planning Commission' s recommendation for such action seemed to be
missing. He presented a print of the original site plans which had
been drawn up June 7, 1963, which he indicated was fifteen months
before the home at 3501 - 36th Street N.E. and 18 months prior ,to 'the
construction of the Esau home at 3505 - 36th Avenue N.E. to the south
of the church property.
Commissioner Jones indicated he had visited the site and disagreed
that the structure would only be the height of a two story house,
saying Mr. Esau would actually be facing a building which is 34 feet
higher than his property because of the higher elevation of the church
site. The church trustee agreed there was a variation in the height
of the bank at the south end of the lot and later indicated that though
the total elevation of the church addition would be 24 . 8 feet , with
the existing grade, the building would actually be an additional six
feet higher for the Antczak property and between seven or eight feet
higher than the Esau home .
Commissioner Bowerman questioned the implication that the 1964 Council
had given complete approval to all the plans presented to them at
that time , believing they would not have approved any future plans
without having detailed site plans for those improvements . He also
asked whether the architect had taken core testings on which he had
based his advice that the existing footings might not be adequate to
support a second floor to which Mr . Jones responded that no such
testings -had been taken to date but that alternate would still not be •
acceptable to the building committee because with it the larger
kitchen, narthex and restrooms the congregation needs would not be
provided.
Reverend Joseph Ol Valtinson, Jr . , 5215 Pierce Street N.E. , pastor of
the Elmwood church, indicated he perceives his church provides a
service to the community having a food shelf which provides for those
who need help in the area and a licensed psychologist who ministers
to City residents as well as parishioners of the church . Because no
agreement was- reached at the August 4th meeting, Pastor Valtinson
said he was appealing to the Planning Commission to settle the dif-
ferences fairly. He mentioned that in his own- case, his view of the
whole City. of Minneapolis was obstructed when his neighbor built his
home and another neighbor had sued that neighbor for the same reason.
He also cited what he perceives would be a similar incident in Edina,
where a fast growing church enlarged its parking lot over the objections
of the neighbors and provided enough plantings to provide a buffer
which made the expansion less objectionable. The minister indicated
he didn.' t:believe the size of the addition would be much wider than a
normal home with an attached garage.
Commissioner- Bjorklund indicated his experience with estimating church
property had caused him to expect the cost of the proposed addition
would be, closer to $300, 000 than the $150 , 000 reported by Mr. ,Jones
. in his statement since at $150 ,000 the church would only be paying
$20 . 23 per square foot, a completely unrealistic. .figure with today' s •
construction costs . Reverend Valtinson indicated the cost estimate
had come-from a contractor who was willing to let church members do
the finishing work. : The minister assured the Commissioner that the
s
-3-
• building constructed with donated labor would meet all state and
city codes and standards .
Commissioner Bjorklund then questioned whether the same method of
calculation had been applied to reach the $750 ,000 cost estimated for
the future sanctuary addition on the north which he said he would
expect would cost $101 per foot for the same size addition as on the
south. Mr. Jones told him he was also surprised when the architect
had quoted those figures to him, but believed the difference could be
accounted for because the two additions would not be alike at all
since the addition on the south would resemble a single family con-
struction and on the other hand, the. sanctuary would require laminated
beams , stained glass windows and a lot more brick and stone work. The
$750 , 000 represented a finished, much larger addition, where the
contractor' s estimate for the current proposal , which the architect
had said could run between $200 , 000 and $225 ,000, but not $300 , 000 ,
represented the builder' s costs for roughing the structure in and
permitting the church members to do all the painting and tile instal-
lation. He added that the church could not afford the more expensive
addition at this time.
An Elmwood deacon , Martin Gavin, 141 Hartman Circle , cited the fact
that the church had traded the property where the Esau home is now
for the property to the north- with the Billman Construction Company
and perceived this proposal as a continuation of the "give and take"
process . He said he is a plumbing inspector for the City of Minneapolis
and would supply much of the plumbing_, labor. and materials - and--anoth-er
church member who is a builder has indicated he would provide the
materials at cost. Mr. Gavin therefore indicated he believed a cost
of between $150 , 000 and $200 , 000 would not be unrealistic for the
southern expansion. In response to the claim that the properties to
the south of the church would be harmed by the addition, Mr. Gavin
said those homes already have a buffer of a large cottonwood tree and
two evergreens to shield their view, as illustrated in the pictures
taken by another parishioner, Dennis Olson , 3117 Rankin Road, which
were passed around for the Commission and staff to see . The plumbing
inspector also stated all water and sewer service was in the south end
of the building and it would be very expensive to build the kitchen
or restrooms on the north side .
When Commissioner Bjorklund inquired why the church didn' t just add
more church services as other Lutheran churches do, if they are needed,
Mr. Gavin told him the Elmwood church philosophy is family oriented
and the Sunday school classes are held so the children and parents
can attend the church services as a family. He said there would be
another service added this month to follow the Sunday school which
would give the families a choice of services to attend, but, adding
another service would not solve the lack of class space. The deacon
admitted that up to three years ago, there had been only 20 - 30
Elmwood parishioners attending regularly , but ,said that number -had
grown to over 350 , plus children, a: figure the pastor corrected to
"closer to 200" .
Mr. Olson indicated he was one of the first members of the congregation
and said, "The Lord answered our prayers for more members abundantly
by providing more than we would handle" in the existing facility .
-4-
The minister told the Chair he was certain the building committee
would be amenable to providing opaque windows for the Sunday school
rooms because that would prevent the children from being distracted
during class .
Commissioner Bowerman indicated he was having trouble making a decision
on the proposal without seeing what actual elevations , exterior
finish -and roof line would be provided. Mr. Jones said he was sorry
he had not brought the elevation drawings which he had presented at
the July 19th meeting back to this hearing , but assured the Commis-
sioner that the building would be designed to match the fascia and
roof line of the existing building as closely as possible. The
elevation of the building above grade, he said, would be 24 feet 8 inches .
Gundrun Hodenfield, 1401 Mooney Drive; Mary Jane Johnson, 3132 Silver
Lake Road; and Paul Stewart, 3085 Old Highway 8, indicated they would
be in favor of granting the permit but chose not to speak further to
the issue at that time .
Donald Esau, 3505 - .36th Avenue N.E. , read his prepared statement in
which he reiterated his own and his neighbors ' objections to the
construction of the addition on the south side of the existing build-
ing and requested the City not compound what he perceives to be the
original error in permitting the church to construct the existing
building perpendicular to the adjoining homes on the south and only
15 feet from the lot line on that side at the same time the elevations
of the church property were elevated approximately eight feet above
the residential lots adjacent to it. He contended the proponents
could not accurately indicate on the application form that the proposed
addition would not be "detrimental to the health , safety , and general
welfare" of at least two of the neighbors since he believes both he and
the Antczaks would suffer decreased property values as a result of the
addition and a personal loss to his family of the benefits of the new
family room and deck he had added to the back of his home not fore-
seeing an addition would be made to the existing church building .
Mr . Esau then indicated he saw no relevance in the tradeoff of property
20 years ago to the current proposal and told the Commission members
he has always considered the cottonwood tree on the church property
to be a real nuisance and had intended asking that it be cut down .
Commissioner Bowerman told Mr. Esau having homes in the City built
perpendicular to each other and with less than 15 foot side yards is
not unusual at all and the church could have built within five feet
of the lot line under the City ordinance. He said his home on Croft
Drive in which he lived for 15 years was only 72 feet from the lot .
line and his neighbors back yard was also perpendicular to his . Mr.
Esau still insisted the back yard setback requirement should have
been applied in a case like this .
Erling Weiberg, 3409 — 36th Avenue N.E. , read the written statement.
from Larry and Sandy Antczak, who live directly south of the church
at 3501 - 36th Avenue N.E. , who were away on vacation, in which they
reiterated the objection they had made during the July 19th hearing to
the expansion which, in their view, was "too large and too close to
single family dwellings; could only intensify the water runoff problems
1
-5-
they experience now, and would lower the market value of their home . "
• They also raised the question of whether the addition might cut off
the access to their property for emergency vehicles and power company
service for the transformer in their back yard.
Mr. Weiberg then told the Commission members he had served as spokes-
person for the six affected property owners along 36th Avenue at the
meeting with the, church officials and had been requested to present a
petition, signed by 23 of his neighbors , representing 13 households
on 36th Avenue and Wendhurst, against the addition which they perceive
would be "injurious to property values of the existing homes" and
requesting an environmental study, including the potential for water
runoff damage and possible hazard of cutting off utility and Fire
Department access to their homes , before final approval of any build-
ing plan is given. In response to the latter, Commissioner Zawislak
said he imagined NSP would follow their usual procedure of moving a
transformer when access becomes difficult.
Raul F . Cifuentes, who indicated he had moved to his home at 3413
36th Avenue N.E. in June of this year, asked why he had not been
notified about the two hearings on this proposal. He was told the
tax rolls which list the previous owner had been used for the mailing
of notices and that person had apparently not returned the letter to
him. Mr. Cifuentes indicated he believed the proposed addition would
be a problem for all the residents on 36th with the increase of cars
and noise on the property and said he would never have purchased the
• home if the realtor had '"t61-dh ma15out the- proposed expansion.- He
added that right now he has trouble listening to his own music on
Sunday mornings because of the organ music coming from the church.
His final point was his personal opinion that churches like Elmwood
and St. Charles should . not be spending. money on expansions when there
are so many people dying of starvation all over the world. -
Commissioner Jones noted the proposed expansion would add 75 feet to
the existing 60 foot church wall, resulting in a 135 foot long building
for the neighbors to look at. He explored several other ways of
preventing this., but Mr. Gavin told him the proposed plan was the only
one the architect considered would be considered economically feasible
for the additional room the church needs with the existing sewer and
water service . When asked whether the architect would be available
to answer the questions more specifically at the Council meeting ,
Mr. Jones said that person would not be able to attend that meeting
either.
The meeting was closed at 9 :05 P.M. , for Commission discussion and
action.
Mr. Gilligan indicated he would not be too concerned with any tentative
expansion plans developed for the church in 1963 since he perceives
the, Council in 1964 only approved the building plans for--the existing
structure and not these plans . He told the Chair the City would .not be
bound by any implied approval of the expansion in view of the passage
of .20 years and changes in the neighbprhood makeup since that time .
He .confirmed that a conditional use permit is only good for one year,
if the approved use is not constructed.
r.
-6-
Chair Makowske then stated that she perceives the question before the •
Commission should be whether or not the proposal meets all three con-
ditions which Minnesota and. City ordinances require must be satisfied
before a conditional use permit can be authorized. There was a general
consensus that the first and third questions could be answered af-
firmatively by the applicants but there was a strong indication that
the neighbors perceived some injury with the development of the
proposal as requested.
Commissioner Zawislak -indicated he did not believe the proposed height
of the addition would be out of line with those of other dwellings in
the City residential districts .
Commissioner Bjorklund suggested that if a poll were taken of those
who were present in the room at that moment or to the zoning map on
the wall, it would be apparent that almost 90 percent of the homes
have much more than 40 feet of backyard for recreational , etc. purposes.
He, therefore , said he believed the norm in this regard had been
violated with this application and told Commissioner Zawislak a
38 foot high building is the same as a three story building .
Commissioner Bowerman indicated that, although he understood the
congregation' s hesitancy to expend money on a more specific plan at
this stage, he was still concerned that the Commission was forced to
make a decision on what he perceives to be a very nebulous plan without
positive site plans and no firm commitment about the landscaping, •
drainage , actual height of the addition, etc . for the proposal .
Chair Makowske agreed , saying she would also like to see the window
treatment which would provide privacy for the neighbors since there
is a great deal of difference between having a family living next
door and having a whole congregation viewing your backyard.
Commissioner Bjorklund said he agreed with the neighbors that there
had not been a true cost analysis made for siting the addition else-
where on the property and made the following motion:
Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Chair Makowske to
recommend Council denial of the conditional use permit which would
allow the Elmwood Lutheran Church to add on to the existing church
structure at 3615 Chelmsford Road, finding that the second require-
ment in the application that "The proposed conditional use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values
or improvements in the vicinity" could not be answered affirmatively
for the following reasons :
(1) Property values for at least two of the adjacent properties to
the south- could be adversely affected.
(2) Plenty of available- land now exists on. the church site to accom-
modate an addition .which would provide all the current_ needs of
the .church without adversely affecting the neighbors .-
. . . I
I
-7-
(3) The 20 year old site plans which were considered by another
Planning Commission are now invalidated because of the change in
• the development of the adjacent neighborhood and the fact that
they addressed the existing building and -not this proposal .
(4) Estimated building costs given by the property owner did not
fairly provide the Planning Commission with the ability of com-
paring costs of alternate development construction.
(5) Plumbing service advantages to proposed construction might also
benefit an addition on the existing north side of the building .
(6) Incomplete site plans addressing landscaping, exterior, and window
finishing, drainage or building elevations were not available.
(7) Noise encroachment would very probably result for the adjoining
neighbors .
(8) Major neighborhood and resident opposition was presented during
the two hearings on the proposal , including a petition with 23
signatures, representing 13 homes in the same area .
(9) The proposal appears to violate the community norm set for rear-
yard enjoyment in a single family neighborhood by reduction in size,
view, and general amenities .
The motion recommending Council denial of the Elmwood request passed
• unanimously .
Mr. Childs was requested to let the Council members know that the
Commission perceives this proposal because of the unique topography
of the land, etc. , would require a personal inspection of the subject
site by them.
The meeting was recessed at 9 : 45 P .M. and reconvened at 9 :50 P .M. ,
for the public hearing on the petition for a sign variance which would
allow for a sign to be placed on both sides of the existing pylon
sign located at 2620 Highway 88 , to identify the LaPepiniere Montessori
School and Day Care Center.
The Chair read the notice of the hearing which had been mailed to all
adjacent property owners within 350 feet of the subject site and
published August 4th in the Bulletin. No one present reported failure
to receive the notice or objected to its content.
Marsh Everson, 6515 Barrie Road, Edina, president of the Montessori
center, was present to answer questions about why. he believed his
business , more than the existing merchants in the same shopping center ,
would require a lighted pylon sign to identify his facility, especially
since such signage is permitted under the existing Sign Ordinance for
only gas service stations and large shopping centers . He was told
that ' the existing ".Bank" sign was grandfathered into the new ordinance
for the bank which': had,-, left the' premises in March and that the only
• reason the sign was still up was that the ordinance does not require
it be removed until one year after the departure of the business it
identified. He was also informed that the new ordinance also permits
monument type signs only in industrial districts and -none would be
permitted in a commercial district.
a:
-8-
When asked what hardship he believes he would experience if the ordin-
ance were adhered to, Mr. Everson responded that he had noticed trees •
had obstructed the view of his building as he approached the center
from the industrial park to the east and several of the tradesmen
who . had remodeled the building for, the' school had reported they had
a-hard time finding the school in- its new location. He told Com-
missioner Jones the center cares for children from as far away as
Columbia Heights and Roseville and some sort of identification is
necessary to aid those who bring them to school to find the school .
He also indicated the signage is necessary to identify the school to
potential students . However, he admitted that most of -the children
- are not really drop ins , but are required to attend the school for
at least from six to eight hours a week.
The center president said his wife had signed the petition for the
variance and would have copies of the signage which they might request
if they were not permitted to utilize the existing sign. He then
showed the Commission members pictures of a similar sign a competitor
in the Southdale Shopping Center.
When Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he perceived other merchants in
the same center operate successfully without this type of signage,
Mr. Everson questioned the term "successfully" .
Chair Makowske noted that this would be a lighted sign and told Mr .
Everson other schools in the area have indicated no need for this type
of signage to attract potential students who should have no -trouble •
finding the school in that large shopping center .
Commissioners Zawislak and Jones both perceived that the playground
outside the building along side Highway 88 should serve as an immediate
identification of the activity carried on within the building .
Commissioners Bowerman and Wagner indicated they didn ' t deny the
center needed some identification , but doubted the .school ' s situation
was so much more unique than the other businesses in the same center
that it required as much signage as was requested.
Commissioner Jones agreed, saying he could see no reason why a shcool
should require more identification than a commercial store since "yo.0
don' t pick a school in impulse as you do a pair of shoes" .
At 10 :10 P.M. , the hearing was closed at which time Commissioner
Bjorklund revealed that he has on occasion worked for Mr. Everson and
Commissioner Zawislak indicated his daughter was employed by the
center, which they perceived could appear to present a possible con-
flict of interest for them both .
Motion by -Commissioner Bowerman and seconded by Commissioner Wagner to
recommend Council denial of the petition for a variance to the Sign
Ordinance which would permit the LaPepinier Montessori School and Day
. .Care- Center to be identified by substituting the two sided sign they
. ,propose: .for .the existing "Bank" -sign on the fifteen foot pylon sign •
- 'in -front of the building they rent at 2620 Highway 88, finding that:
-9-
• (1) It has not been demonstrated that there is a particular hardship
which would result for the applicant if the strict letter of the
City . regulations regarding signage were adhered to.
(2) The applicant has ample liberty under the existing sign ordinance
to advertise his business on the exterior of his establishment
the same as other businesses in the same center.
(3) The existing non-conforming "Bank" sign was grandfathered in with
the new sign ordinance and was particular and relative only to
that business which has since vacated the premises and there
would appear to be no justification for continuing the use of the
pylon sign for various and sundry other purposes .
(4) Under the existing sign ordinance the applicant has ample liberty
to advertise the business on the exterior of the establishment
without using a- pylon sign for that purpose .
(5) The City sign ordinance only permits lighted pylon signs of this
type for identifying large shopping centers and gas service
stations and it appears a poor precedent might be set for
similar requests if this sign were permitted as proposed.
Voting on the motion:
Aye : " Bowerman, Wagner, Makowske, and Jones .
Abstention: Bjorklund and Zawislak.
Motion to recommend denial passed.
Mr. Everson then announced that he would like to withdraw the request
before it went to the Council and would prefer to return to the Com-
mission with a different proposal for signage on the building itself .
Commissioner Bjorklund then reported he had found the doors to the
Parkview Center .had been locked for sometime during the last portion
of the evening and since this was the third time this had happened
to his knowledge, requested staff to contact those responsible.
At 10 : 20 P.M. , the Chair opened the hearing to consider the petition
for a sign variance which would allow for an additional building sign
to identify the Zantigo Mexican Restaurant at 3704 Silver Lake Road
from the west side of the Apache complex.
Chair Makowske read the notice which had been mailed to all adjacent
property owners within 350 feet of the subject site and published in
the August 4 , 1983 Bulletin. No one present reported failure to
receive the notice or objected- to its content.' Mr. Childs confirmed
that the notice-_di,s._tance_-would not extend to the res-idents
on 37th Avenue N.E. 'or to the_,;S.tandard Station owner just south of
• the restaurant.
The Manager confirmed: that before the new Sign Ordinance had been
adopted-. there would have been no need''for Zantigo to get approval of
a second sign on the building.
-10-
Appearing for the restaurant was K. C. George who had addressed all •
three conditions and given in his August 3rd letter all the reasons
he perceives the request would meet all three conditions set for
granting such a variance, which the Chair indicated she had found most
helpful . She also. reported noticing that the lights on the existing
signs were turned off each evening as agreed to and reported discussing
the additional signage with Art Thompson who lives on 37th Avenue N.E.
and would be viewing the sign from his picture window and who had
indicated he. would have no. problem with the proposal.
Commissioner Zawislak said he was gratified to find a businessman who
has the foresight not to use all his permitted s-ignage up before he
knows for certain just what additional identification he needs .
It was agreed that this property could be considered unique because
it can be reached from two main thoroughfares and because it repre-
sents an impulse buying type of business , additional signage was
necessary to identify the restaurant to potential customers coming
into the complex from the west to Country Store .
The hearing was closed at 10 : 30 P.M.
Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Zawislak
to recommend the Council grant the variance to the City- Sign Ordinance
for the additional signage as presented on Exhibit "Z" in the agenda
parcel for the Zantigo Restaurant at 3704 Silver Lake Road, finding
that : •
( 1) Granting the variance would not be detrimental or injurious to
other property in the same area because the restaurant is located
in a commercial shopping complex and there are great distances
between it and the closest residential property which could be
adversely affected.
(2) It would be a hardship for the restaurant if the petition for the
variance were denied because of the shape of the building and
its location on a small site within the confines of a large
shopping center with two street frontages and accesses , and most
importantly , three access directions from the west, south and
east.
( 3) The conditions upon which the application is based are unique
to this parcel of land because of the large exposure of the
property to the west where the primary traffic is generated from
the east and south, making signage uniquely difficult on this
particular building and property .
(4) The total signage for the existing signs on the building as well
as the requested sign would be less than the permitted square
- footage for. this building and in other respects this property had
been developed in accordance with .al.l .City and state. codes and
standards . •
(5) No one•. spoke- .in :opposition to the request during the hearing.
-11-
Motion carried unanimously.
• Mr. George indicated he would be unable to attend the Council meeting
August 23rd, but would see to it that someone was present to represent
the restaurant.
At 10 : 45 P.M. , the public hearing was opened to consider the petition
for a variance to the sign ordinance which would permit the existing
free standing ; non-conforming sign which identifies Twin City Federal
Savings and Loan office at 3899 Silver Lake Road to be raised 2 feet
2 inches to accommodate additional wording which would inform TCF
customers of the location and existence of a 24 hour teller machine
within the building.
The notice of . the hearing, which had been mailed to all adjacent
property owners within 350 feet of the bank, had been published in
the August 4th issue of the Bulletin, was read by the Chair . No one
present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to its
content.
Because two of the questions -on the petition form which are required
to be answered affirmatively had been answered in the negative and
the application had not been signed, Commissioner Jones questioned
whether the applicants should not be given the opportunity of indicat-
ing whether or not they fully understood the questions . The Chair .
and Commissioner Bowerman indicated, since this sign was already non-
-conforming because such free standing signs are not permitted in -
• commercial districts , they would not want to make the sign larger than
it already was and would like to take the action necessary to prevent
that this same evening. However, they agreed to accept the testimony
of the only person present to speak to the issue .
Kenneth Lee , 3904 Penrod Lane , indicated he had always liked the sign
and if it were raised, he would be able to see the time and temperature
- from his window more easily .
The hearing was closed at 10 : 50 P.I.I.
Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he was concerned that because he does
work for TCF on occasion, it might appear he could have a conflict
of interest in voting on the- matter. However, because he opposed
tabling the matter, he indicated he would vote on that motion, if
it were made.
Motion by Commissioner Bowerman and seconded by Commissioner Wagner
to table the decision on the. additional signage for Twin City Federal.
Voting on the motion:
Aye : Bowerman, Wagner, and Zawislak.
Nay : Jones , Bjorklund, and .Makowske.
Motion to table not carried. .
-12-
Motion by Chair Makowske and seconded by Commissioner Jones to recommend
Council denial of the request for more signage for the Twin City
Federal Savings and Loan office at 3899 Silver Lake Road for the •
following reasons :
(1) Questions 1 and 31n the petition for the variance dated August 4 ,
1983, were not answered affirmatively .as required by Minnesota
statutes and City ordinances.
(2) The Commission does not want to add more spare footage to a 'sign
which is already non-conforming to the City Sign Ordinance.
(3) - Although the existing sign could be perceived to be a public
service, the addition could be considered to be a nuisance.
(4) There was no signature on the petition and no one appeared to
speak for the petition during the public hearing.
Voting on the motion:
Aye: Makowske, Jones , Bowerman, Wagner , and Zawislak.
Abstention: Bjorklund.
Motion to recommend denial carried.
Chair Makowske reported receiving inquiries about the Good Luck Cafe
proposal and was told the proponents had requested the matter be .laid
over at the last Council meeting. She then told the Commission members
that Commissioner Franzese was unable to attend the meeting, that evening
because she was attending a planning seminar which she would be
reporting at the next meeting.
Motion by 'Commissioner Zawislak and seconded by Commissioner Bowerman
to adjourn at 11 :00 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously.
. i
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution Reports-la
August 19, 1983 Ordinance
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Zantigo Sign
Other
August 23, 1983 Request
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: This is a request from Zant i go to place a
wall sign square eet) on t e west side of their building (facing the Country
Store/LaBelle's) . The total square footage is within the sign ordinance, but a
variance is needed because only one wall sign is allowed, and this would exceed
that provision. The Planning Commission recommended approval (see minutes) and
no objections were received.
• FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES :
1 . Approve with Planning Commission reasons/findings.
2. Add or delete from Planning Commission findings , as Council desires.
3. Deny, based on findings of the Council .
RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends approval .
CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS : ,
Date: August 3 , 1983
• Fee : $25. 00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PETITION FOR SIGN VARIANCE
Applicant: Zantigo Mexican Restaurants Phone : 612-831-4045
Address : 4640 Wes-t 77th Street Suite 160 - Edina , Minnesota 55435
Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc. ) : Renter
Legal description of property petitioned for variance:
See Attached
Street Address : 3704 Silver Lake Road
Zoning district in which property is located: . B-2 Commercial
Request:
Minnesota Statutes and City ordinances require that the following conditions
imust be satisfied af-fit:ma.tivel_y.-..__ I.f—the-__answer----to a statement is--Yes
please explain, using additional she
Yes No
1 . - The granting of the variance will not be detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to X
other property in the neighborhood or village;
.and
2 . A particular hardship to the applicant would re-
sult if the strict letter of the regulations are X
adhered to, or
3. The conditions upon which the application for a
variance is based are unique to the parcel of
land for which the variance is sought and are X
not applicable, generally, to other property
within the same land-use classification.
Zanti o Mexican Restaurants
S ' ture f Applicant
By
��lpg4�g Signature wner If of er
AU05 . than applicant)
25•DO�It �e ',� l� s �:a�es �.� <<<, t-�-.�P.f�rc�
a nner L7r r .'te
• .
IL
' '`*
AL
102
! 103 10.4
i
O"
Zantigo Mexican Restaurants
District Office: 4640 W. 77th Street . Suite 160 . Edina, MN 55435 . 612-831-4045
•
August 3 , 1983
Mr . David M. Childs
City Manager
City of St . Anthony.
3301 Silver Lake Road
Minneapolis , Minnesota 55418
Dear Dave ,
Pursuant to Zantigo seeking a variance for an additional
sign on the rear of their res-t-aurant building located in
Apache Plaza , please be advised- of the following -information .
1 . ) The granting of the variance would not be
detrimental or injurious to other property
in the area or the City of St. Anthony
because - the present Zantigo restaurant
building is located within the commercial
complex of the' Apache Plaza Shopping Center
• together with other retail businesses serving
--the communi ty -of- St-; - An-thony . -
2 . ) Zantigo is seeking a variance to locate an
additional sign upon the rear wall of it ' s
existing restaurant in order to create proper
identification to the balance of the shopping
center from the west and also the activity
entering the shopping center from the Stinson
Bouelvard entrance . The rear of the Zantigo
restaurant is very visible to the balance
of the shopping center complex to the west
and by not having any indentification does
create a hardship upon the operation of Zantigo
business . We feel a certain loss of business
does result by not having some indentification
to the customer entering Apache Plaza from
the west .
A Division of Kentucky Fried Chicken
C o n ' t
3 . ) Because the rear of the Zantigo building does
not contain , at present , any indentification
creates a unique situation not normally found
in other Zantigo locations within the metro
area . We find 'a great deal of business activity
does , in fact , enter the 'Apache Plaza complex
from the west (Stinson ) end and leaves by the
same route . The location of the Zantigo building
facing Silver Lake Road(east) can best be
indentified from activity upon Silver Lake Road
and not Stinson Bouelvard. This is an unusual
situation that would not normally occur in
similar commercial areas having just one major
artery for ingress and egress .
Respectively submitted ,
K. C . George`
Real Estate Representative
KCG : 1kj
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution Reports-lb
August 19, 1983 Ordinance
Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Twin City Federal
—�— Other
August 23,J983 Sign Request
.
------------------------------------- - - -----------
TO: Mayor and Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: This is a request for a variance to raise the
Twin City Federal sign at 3899 Silver Lake Road by 2 feet 2 inches to identify the
24 hour teller. As noted in the minutes of the Planning Commission, this request
was recommended for denial for several reasons, one of the most important of which
is the failure of the applicant to attend the hearing . A call to American Signs, the
manufacturer of the sign , showed that a mix up between their office and Leroy
Signs , the installer, occurred and they apologized for not having a representative
present. Questioning about the items checked on the application form showed that
a possible misunderstanding about the meaning of the questions asked (double
negative in ,#1 ) . The applicant will be present to explain these items and the
• attached information is available for your review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES :
1 . Deny the request based on the Planning Commission report .
2. Approve the request, if further testimony provides basis for doing so.
RECOMMENDATION: Per Counci 1 .
• CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS :
Date: 8/4/83
Fee : $25.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PETITION FOR SIGN VARIANCE
Leroy Signs , Inc .
Applicant: Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Phone: 535-0080
Address : � ��/ ,�xj� / �f}� /�t'gf�l�T/ 6325 Welcome Avenue N.
Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc. ).: Installer
Legal description of property petitioned for variance:
Street Address : 3899 Silver Lake Road
Zoning district in which property is located: (B) commercial
Request: Add 12 .36 Square Feet to existing Display for 1124 Hour Teller"
faces .
'Minnesota Statutes and City ordinances require that the following conditions
must be satisfied affirmatively. If the answer to a statement is Yes,
• please- -explain, using adds tkon-a1 sheets . - --
Yes No
1 . The granting of the variance will not be detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to X
other property in the neighborhood or village;
and
2 . A particular hardship to the applicant would re-
sult if the strict letter of the regulations are X
adhered to, or
3. The conditions upon which the application for a
variance is based are unique to the parcel of
land for which the variance is sought and are X
not applicable, generally , to other property
within the same land-use classification.
Signature of Applicant
• Signature of Owner If of er
than applicant)
H11 164508 AU f;8 8 0 A 2 5.000K
r
American Sign & Indicator Corporation
® CORPORATE OFFICES.2310 FANCHER WAY,SPOKANE,WASHINGTON•FOR MAIL:P.O.DRAWER 2727,99220 a PHONE 15091535-4101 a TWX-510-773-1839
•
July 18, 1983
Mr. David Childs, Mgr.
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
Dear Mr. Childs:
Enclosed is a design print (#W-2710) for our good customer, Twin City
Federal Savings & Loan. There is also attached, a photograph and
shop drawing of the existing signage of the Apache Office. You will
note that we wo,uld like to raise the existing signage 2'2" to
accomodate the sign face that informs TCF's customers of the 24 hour
cash machine location and existance.
No other changes would be requested. This "24 hour teller" copy -
would be- internally illuminated just as the upper identification
faces are currently.
Can this request be put on the next agenda for consideration?
Should you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to get in touch
with me.
Best Regards,
American Sign & Indicator Corporation
Dave Shannon (612)475-3194
18725 Minnetonka Boulevard
Deephaven, Minnesota 55391
WATTS LINE 1(800)541-6459
11 •
Ll
IT
1 D •
` u Q
Acl
���� �•��� � -�,� �e�o,�a' Abp � �f �'
�� � • �' �CC�:" r .Y- •r+3 @i�fi�'3'tti!��.!y rah rYy °.�.�,,. "
r
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number
Resolution
August 19, 1983 Ordinance Reports-lc
Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Elmwood Lutheran
Other
August 23, 1983 Church Conditional Use
-------------------------------=----------------------------------------
TO: Mayor and 'Councilmen
FROM: David M. Childs , City Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Elmwood Church is requesting a conditional
use permit to allow an addition to their church in line with the existing church.
The Planning Commission recommended denial of the request with numerous reasons .
Several attachments are presented herewith as well . as all of the information
recorded in the Planning Commission minutes of July 19th and August 16th .
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Deny. t e request based on Planning Commission findings or Council modifications .
2. Approve the requested based on City Council findings .
i
i
RECOMMENDATION: Per Council .
CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: : . . , ..COMMENTS :
uar.e
Fee: $10.0.00
® CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Application for Conditional Use Permit �//JJ �'
(other than day care center)
Applicant �L A/(b�/OO� �u rp t�2.�n/ GM:;[�PL/T Phone 799 ' C1 -/0 _
Address
Status of applicant (owner., buyer, renter, agent, etc. ) - 0i/_.3,k/C`7,
Legal description of property in question
W 4P. 3;1O 7 k
Street Address Ro "')Lz
Zoning district in which property is located
Conditional use proposed
• Minnesota statutes and City ordinances require that the following conditions
be satisfied before a conditional use may be authorized:
Yes No
1 . The proposed conditional use is ' one of the conditional
uses specifically listed for the zoning district in ✓
which it is to be located.
2 . The proposed conditional use will- not be detrimental to
the health, safety or general welfare of persons resid-
ing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property v�
values or improvements in the vicinity .
3. The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable
at the above location to provide a service or a
facility which is in the interest of public conveni-.
ence and will contribute to the general . welfare of - the ✓
neighborhood or community. ,
Explain: LJi5M 7b Az.; ef301A:co.v4(- kt-,44 ti7
)?-6.dR 1120.6fc! % . AoJ#AJT P402K.
. 0 T t f., A L12` lpy is,
(use additional sheets if necessary)
ignature o �,Ap licant
�OSTI t ,
ol
U
O �
J
3 t
HE L ,
IMINNESOTA
R., BI
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
July 19 , 1983-
The meeting was called to order by Chair- Makowske at 7:35 P.M.
Present for roll call:. . Zawislak, Bowerman, Makowske, Bjorklund and
Franzese. Wagner arrived- a few minutes later.
Also present: David Childs, .City.--Manager.
The following amendments were made. to the minutes' of the June 21st
Commission meeting:
Page. 1, para. 7: Substitute "shorter than originally proposed .for a
total of 43 feet" for- "shorter than the 43 foot
tall building originally proposed" .
Page 2 , para. 1 : Substitute "equal distance from" for "would be
close to" in line 8.
Page 2 , para. 2 : Substitute "could" for "would" in line 4.
Page 4 , para. 1: Substitute "northeast" for "northwest" in line 3.
Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Franzese
to approve as amended the minutes for the Planning Commission meet-
ing held June 21, 1983.
Motion carried unanimously .
Commissioner Bowerman will report the minutes of the meeting at the
Council meeting July 26th.
At 7: 40 P.M. the Chair opened the public hearing to consider a condi-
tional use permit which would allow the Elmwood Lutheran Church to
Z on to the existing church building located at' 3615 Chelmsford
Road by reading the notice which had gone out to all property owners
within 350 feet of the subject property and had been published -in the
Bulletin July 7, 1983.
No one present reported failure to receive this notice or .objected
to its content.
Mr. Childs reported that traditionally churches have- to meet the- same
setback requirements as are set for .residential dwellings , - and this
proposed addition of 4300 square feet to the east of the existing .
church structure conforms to all parking setback requirements. of the
: .Zoning Ordinance. He : told Commissioner. Bjorklund he. does not believe
guidelines have.beeh- established in. the City Ordinance dealing with .
set :standards, of height as. related 'to-'setback. The Manager -also
confirmed that the existing church structure location was -approved
after the 1962' Zoning Ordinance was adopted'.. The application for -the
-2-
permit had been made by Dick Jones, 5157 - 6th Street N.E. , a trustee •
for the church and a member of the Building Committee and Mr. Jones
was present to answer questions about the proposal. He reiterated
that the addition would increase the existing sanctuary seating
capacity to 300 , would provide 10 new classrooms, a kitchen and an
assembly (Fellowship) room with a split level structure to be con-
structed immediately behind the sanctuary. The church trustee told
of the rapid growth of the Elmwood congregation under the leadership
of Pastor ,Valtinson and the desperate need for additional Sunday .*
School classrooms which would be' met temporarily by renting six rooms
in the -Wilshire building this winter while the expansion is: being
constructed. Mr. Jones assured the Commissioners that it would not
be necessary to remove any of the evergreens or bushes which provide
a buffer for the adjoining properties from the existing parking lot
when that lot is enlarged five feet to provide parking for 148 cars .
The Manager confirmed that the City Ordinance only requires 120
parking spaces for an expansion of the size proposed. He also reported
the applicant had notified him that he had misunderstood the meaning
of Condition ;#2 in the application and had mistakenly answered that
question in the negative. Mr. Jones also confirmed that the architect
who had drawn the site plans had inadvertantly omitted the existing
garage from the drawings .
When Commissioner Bowerman inquired why an addition would not be
built across the back of the existing structure, making a square
building which would not so adversely affect the properties immediatel
to the south , whose lot lines would be only 15 feet from the structure
the church trustee indicated the building committee had considered
-other alternatives but had concluded the expansion of the roof line
to the east would be more logical since the sanctuary had been built
with a stud wall and not concrete, so such an expansion could be
made , and so as not to foreclose the possibility of adding another'
sanctuary on the west when the congregation could afford that
improvement.
There was a discussion of the drop in grade elevations between the
church .property and the adjoining lots to the east and the possibility
of adverse effect of water runoff from the new structure on those
properties . The retention of the opaque windows in the Fellowship
Iiall to provide privacy for the neighbors , provision of accessibility
for the handicapped, and buffering to -prevent headlights from shining
on the neighbors ' homes when night services are held were also
explored.
Erling .M. Weiberg, 3409 - 36th Avenue N.E. said his property would
not be adversely affected by the expansion but he was present to
support the concerns of his neighbors -about the expansion. -
Don Esau .who owns the property_ at 3505: .-- 36th Avenue N.E. , just south
of the. church, reiterated the points .made in the letter to the Plan-
ning. Commission which he gaffe the . secretary for inclusion' in the
minutes which stated Mr. Esau' s belief �tha.t- the proposed .addition •
-would ".substantially reduce- my quality�of: life and also reduce' the,
-value of my property" and indicated .the. residen.t intends to take legal
action .if--those judgments are confirmed. ,,- Mr.: Esau invited the
-3-
commission members to sit on the deck he had built on his home to
improve his view to see how that view and air quality would be
blocked by the church addition. He was also concerned that the run-
off from that building would ruin the planted areas to the back of
his property. The resident told of the many ways in which he had
supported the church which at first was "very poor" and of his dis-
appointment that church officials hadn' t discussed their expansion
plans with him.. He indicated the neighbors had always understood
any expansion of the church property would be to the north where the
150 foot wall would only face the school. lair. Esau also contended.
the addition would not be of' benefit to the City if adjoining property
values and taxes were decreased.
Mr. and Mrs . Lawrence Antczak whose backyard at 3501 - 36th Avenue N.E.
is about 75%. blocked off by the existing structure, said, with the
expansion, their property would be completely cut off- and the pro-
blems they now- experience with runoff would be intensified. They
joined Mr. .Esau in saying they supported an expansion of the church
in any other direction than proposed and were disappointed that they
had not been consulted about. the proposed addition.
Mr. Dick Jones indicated he appreciated the neighbors ' comments and
apologized for not taking the initiative for talking to them, which
had had believed another church - official had done. He said the
church needs the added space primarily for classrooms and the
original plans which had been referred to that evening , calling for
• - an expansion to the north; --had been drawn) by a-high sclyool-student
and if followed, would prevent the addition of a new sanctuary later
when the church could afford it. The trustee said he would talk to
the architect to see what could be done to prevent the runoff onto
the adjacent properties and would be open to suggestions from the
neighbors about the plans .
Commissioner Bowerman recalled the questions raised about the obstruc-
tion of sunlight by the elderly housing structure on Kenzie Terrace
and wondered what effect 34 feet of obstruction would have across
the back of the adjacent properties , even though the church is north
of the adjacent properties .
Since the church official had indicated the final plans would not
be submitted for approval before the annual meeting in January,
Commissioner Jones asked him if -he would be amenable to tabling the
Commission decision for a month in which time the proposal could be
presented to the neighbors at a meeting between the groups . Mr .
Dick. Jones indicated he would welcome an opportunity to invite the
neighbors to meet with the building committee and the pastor to try
to work out their differences.. Mr. Esau then indicated he also. was
happy to hear the Commission member' s suggestion since he perceives
the church has done a .wonder�ful job of bringing its message to the
community-and-he had not...understood_,why the-decision had been-made
to obstruct his property.,
-4-
i"
At 8: 30 P.M. , the Chair closed the public hearing for consideration
by the Commission.
'• I
Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he would oppose tabling the matter
if no major -change in the proposal were to be made. He recalled
previous instances where neighbor opposition had atrophied with time.
He believed certain areas of concern about the proposal had not been
addressed, including what he perceives is a departure from traditional
practice in - the City of having at least 150 feet of backyard between
dwellings. : ,Mr.. Esau reported his home is only about 40 feet from the
lot line: Commissioner Bjorklund then indicated he would like to
hear more about what the City 's liability would be . if "it permitted a
development where the runoff caused damage to a neighbor's property.
Commissioner. Wagner indicated lie believed church officials would have
ample time to work out any differences with their neighbors in the
month between meetings which tabling the matter would provide.
Mr. Childs said that all six adjacent property owners closest to the
proposed addition would be notified of the continuation of the hearing .
Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Bowerman
to continue the public hearing on the Elmwood Lutheran Church expan-
sion plans to 7: 30 P.M. during the PlE.nning Commission meeting
August 16 , 1983, to give the church building committee an opportunity
of working out their mutual concerns about those plans with their
neighbors and to report back any adjustments in the plans which
resulted from those meetings .
Motion carried unanimously.
At 8: 45 P.M. the Chair opened the public hearing to consider granting
a conditional use permit which would allow for the operation of a
non-alcoholic bar in a commercial district for the property previously
operated as Chick' s Billiards at 2523 Harding Street N.E. , by reading
the notice of the hearing which had been mailed- to all property
owners within 350 feet of the subject property and published in the
Bulletin July 7th.
No one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to
its content. The Manager confirmed that he had received no calls or
letters related to the proposal from any of those who had received
the notice. He indicated the applicant, .Robert Slick, 3400 Buchanan
Street N.E. might want video games sometime in the future but these
would not be transferable from Chick ' s under the City Ordinance. No
permit for music or dancing is required under the City Ordinance,
he added.
Mr... Slick said , he would be renting directly from 'Mr. Salitermari, ,
since the shopping center owner considered the property to be abandoned
by the Chick 's proprietors . " He said his establishment would be named
"The Alternative" since it would provide an alternative to alcoholic
.beverages' and.. atmosphere normally found in -other types_ of bars . He i
anticipates -there.: is a real need for ,an establishment of this -type
since. none. has-_.been provided. -closer than Blaine and told of the (•
successful operation of . a similar facility., the Dry Dock, . on Highway 10.
. To the Planning Commission of St. Anthony Village
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen;
We, of the- building committee, of Elmwood Lutheran Church, wish to express
our thanks for this hearing extension. It has given us the opportunity
to do some additional homework, and also provided us the chance to meet
some of the neighbors. As you may know, the officers of a church usually
change every 1 to 3 years so we do not always have the continuity that
is important at these times.
The committee held a meeting with the six neighbors on the south--on
Thursday, August 4th. We- were able to express our views and concerns and
to also listen to theirs. There is actually only two families that would
be affected by our proposal, the Antczak family and the Esau family. The
attached sketch show the approximate location of their homes in relation
to the proposed addition. The Antczak property is already 75% aligned
with the present church building and would therefore lose about 19 feet
of northerly viewing. The Esau property presently has about 1/2 of their
view blocked by three large trees. The church addition would restrict
their view directly to the north over the church's back yard. Their
2 large evergreens block most of the view to the Northeastf the park.
As was stated in the first hearing, the church chose this plan of ex-
pansion for numerous reasons. We also considered alternate plans then
and just recently after our neighborhood meeting. Our main concerns
• for this expansion are as follows; we need about 10 more classrooms;
We -need to expand the sanctuary to seat another 100 people; we need to
enlarge the kitchen to better serve our needs; we need to provide more
restrooms; we need to expand the narthex to avoid the crowding that we
presently hav_e; _ even though we are growing, we have limited funds.
I have outlined some of the alternate plans here;
A - Expand the sanctuary 15 feet to the west and add a classroom
wing off of the present educational wing.
1 - Advantage - no need for a variance.
2 - Disadvantage - Costly to move the existing7_-liri_c1-- vall and
stained glass window; the added classrooms would block the
existing windows and restrict future expansion to the north; this would
allow no provision for enlarging the na?hex, the kitchen or the restrooms.
B - Expand the sanctuary by removing the block wall and exposing the
beams which would, in effect, widen the room rather than lengthen it.
1 - Advantage - no variance required.
2— Disadvantage - the view of the altar area would be restricted;
the narthex area would be reduced rather than expanded; and.
again, . there is no room to add restrooms or enlarge the kitchen.
C - Build a balcony at the rear of the sanctuary.
1 - Advantage - additional seating within the present room, no
variance required. _
.2 - Disadvantage - insufficient height except at the center and
would require two stairways thereby greatly reducing the seating.
D - Build a second floor over the present classrooms. •
1 - Advantage - no yard space consumed.
2 - Disadvantage - costly since entire roof would have to be removed;
this taller structure would detract from the overall appear-
ance of the church. not sure whether the present footing are
a equate to support the added weight..__ still need larger
kitc en ,-narthex and restrooms.
E - New sanctuary and classrooms at the north end of the property.
1 - Advantages - new larger facility and classrooms away from
property line; no need to change present facility.
2 - Disadvantages - too costly at this time (9750.000) ; will still
need to enlarge kitchen and add restrooms; tn-Ls plan is
in the future plans when we experience further growth.
H' Present plan as proposed.
1 - Advantage - sanctuary can be enlarged for the least possible
cost; additional classrooms and a fellowship hall can be added
within the same structure for lowest cost; new kitchen to
be located in the most desireable area" narthex and
added restrooms, all contained In the same construction area;
proximity to the present service lines; use of the fellow-
ship hall to provide additional seating for the sanctuary over- .
flow; full-fill our T;i-(,ds for the next 5 to 10 years; provide
an overall buildinL, thgtrwill he an aesthetic asset to the area,
since the church was originally dasigned with this addition in
mind; it is, by far, the least costly, estimated at >150.000.
It should.he -minted out that a site plan was draw on 6/7/63 and approved
by the planning n.nning commission on 7/20/64_: shows this very nlan ac a f'nture
-Ytension. It also shows the future sanctuary at the north ena. The
builcili ng permit for the church was granted to Elmwood on 7/28/64, which
is 18 months prior to the Esau residence (1/7/66) and 15 months prior
to the Antczak residence (10/19/65) . We feel that since this expansion
area was originally approved and that the church was first to obtain their
building permit, that we should be allowed to continue with this plan.
It is really the only feasible plan that can meet our needs and fit into
our budget at this time. The proposed structure would be about _24--feet
in height which is within a .foot of the height of a two-story hone. Since
our building lies to the north of the affected property owners, there would
be no obstruction of sunlight nor would the prevailing winds be blocked.
We are more than willing to plant extra shrubbery along the line and also
to provide drain tile for water runoff if that is also desired.
We certainly do not wish to create bad feelings within the neighborhood
and we want the church to be an asset to the community, however we do
feel that this is a necessary and proper .proposal and will meet build_Ing
and city codes. We would appreciate .the City granting us the necessary
rear-yard setback and subsequent permit to proceed. Thank You..
Respectfully submitted,
Dick Jones, Trustee
August 1.2, l9£?3
PETITION to City cf St. Anthony Village Officials
We, the tax paying citizens of the City of St. Anthony, residing
on 36th Avenue, N.E. and adjoining streets in close proximity to
Elmwood Lutheran Church, object to the location of the proposed
addition of the church. We feel that extending- the church along
the south end of the property would be injurious to-property values
of the existing homes. Therefore we respectively request that
the Church propose alternate plans for consideration. We further
request that an environmental assessment be made and reviewed
prior to final approval. of any building plan. This .assessment,
as a minimum, should include the effect of rain water and utility
and Fire Department access.
Ilk
3 Cy
'i
T,7
A Y �,
C
i
t�
pl(_t'l7�� lam.
3 Cf C 3 Cam .
�f
:3, �� /'✓,�' , h/�/% .s__�fll�
r
•
"TO ThE PLANNINU Cu142,11ISSICN OF THE CITY OF ST ANTHONY"
Since we cannot be at the meeting to present our feelings
on this issue, please except .this .letter as our statement.
We are Larry and Sande Antezak. We own the property
exactly South of the existing church. Our address is 3501-
36th Ave N.E. As we have stated before, 65% of the church
now blocks our back yard. By adding another 75ft to the
building, would totally block off any back yard acc�'g_!p-.
We strongly oppose the proposed addition, ?. re feel it
could possibly endanger our family physically, We question
the fire access to the back of our house, electric power Co.
access to the power pole and transformer on the corner of our
lot. And also the air current quality, with that building
bloc'•-ing our North exposure. 3ut r_ostly would it indeed effect
• the value of our property or if we decide to sell,one day in
the future, i•rould that large of a. building directly be'r:ind the
�.ouse, effect the mar'tiet availability of t�:e property??
We ask ..!het-.er the zoning code for this circumstance
s_-.ould be questioned . Its just to large of a building, to close
to fa.-ily dwellin¢s . ide live here 7 days a week, the church is
used at theost maybe 2 days by all the paris_".ioners.
Ide were present at the meeting between the Church people
and the neighbors, and nothing could be resolved. They presented
us with no alternatives. One of the church members even mentioned
that as they were planning their remolding in the . beginning,
they knew they. were going .to have problems with 2 families.
So we see that they must of had some doubt that these plans were
• not in the best interest for all.
We have had , in the 4 years we have lived at this address,
somewhat of a water runoff problem from the existing church. •
We personally have packed the rut, it has made in the bank
with dirt and rocks, hoping to block any runoff onto our property.
We also have continued tornow the steep bank, but not letting
our boys do so, because it is very dangerous. In doing so we
feel we have done our part of being a -good neighbor to the
church, up to this point.
With so much land owned by the church whir should it be
vital to rile everything on the south end of the lot, when to
the north they have no farily dwellings to contend with.
We es tax paying citizens ask you the planning commission
to reject the proposal of this building.
Our final statement is we are opposed only to the PRESENT
Proposal build ng. site, when more ada.quate locations exist- on
the grounds.
Thar-:7 you f-or putting tr_is letter into consideration,
Larry and Sande Antczak
of
1
August 1.6, 19(93
• As requested by tre llanntn p at the July 19th meetinv , the
c,-ncerr.ed ne5ghbors met, with the Elmwood Lutt:erar. Chinch officers on Aug. 4th.
The church did not propose any adju.stnPrts or alternatives to their present
nimn. They indtcflt.ed t'iat sh-nibs could be planted to 11"-prove the landscape
around the addition. Thr, netghboks nnggested several alternatives which
the church wr�uld nct a^_c�;pt. Tr- say t''^e least,the results ®t the meeting
were very disappc.'.ntiny .
I understa- ' Vat V-vre may be no set standards of height as relatee to settack
and we can-tit ~h,ar t; fact axi_stir.? c:iurch t-u!lding is fifteen
feet frcm 'hR let line and t.�e pr.c _ty :??e:•a`_nd a7rra:rimately feet
above t':a re-+., °+':::1 '.c,ts. F-wo•. _x, 1 be1:,-.,e '_I- `,e in-r-zoT-er to
conpound %-a a;rp -~:' t",,, currEnt una•?s'_.ra:)I: _it-i:ation.
I direct vour attention to condition number two of theaaprli.cation. The
Frrposed arir?ition bo V-�e &.arch will '�e detremental to health , safety and
general welfare of a t, 'least two the r ei hbors'
petition an environmental ass,:ss^rent shovl ri be In _er91t r or� pzcperty
values will be injured. And tt is certainly injurious to the ;.rcr:erty
improvement of the family roor. and deck addition I nadE to my ,repe:ty.
Therefcre, I resrectively request that the Manning Ccnmission reject the
proposal.
L1, E,AL
3505 - 36th Ave., N.E.
'el �` 781-;G38
ADRAN 6,
HELGES(YI qk
c• AND COMPANY
'ed Public
3710IDS� enttr Agenda Item: Reports-3a Status : Informational
37t• Center
80 South 81h Street
Minneapolis,MN 55402
(612)341-3030
June 30, 1983
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of St. Anthony, Minnesota
3301 Silver Lake Road
St-. Anthony, Minnesota 55418=
We have examined the financial statements of the City of St .
Anthony for the year December 31, 1982 and have issued our
report thereon dated June 3, 1983. As part of our examination,
we reviewed and tested the City's system of internal accounting
control as required by generally accepted auditing standards.
Under these standards, the purpose of such evaluation is to
establish a basis for reliance thereon for determining the
nature, timing and extent of other auditing procedures that are
necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial
statements.
Our evaluation of the City' s system o.f internal control, which
was made for the purpose set forth above, would not necessarily
disclose all weaknesses in the system. However, such evaluation
disclosed the following matters that we believe warrant the
attention of. the City' s management . Several of these comments
appeared in a similar letter for the preceding year. They are
essentially repetitious but are repeated because we believe
they have continuing relevance.
Segregation of Duties
Segregation of duties and responsibilities is an important
element of internal accounting control. When an organization
has few employees involved in certain accounting functions,
however, optimum segregation of duties is usually impracticable ,
but procedural changes which contribute to strengthened controls
are often possible.
One employee presently performs substantially all cash•
receipting procedures which includes opening mail, issuing
receipts and preparing the daily deposit. The same person
maintains utility billing records,- :including individual
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of St. Anthony
June 30, 1983 •
Page 2
customer's receivable balances. As-previously recommended, the
mail-opening task should be assigned to another employee, who
would restrictively endorse checks received before submitting
them to the individual responsible for preparing and issuing
receipts.
Bank reconciliations are being prepared by an employee involved
in cash disbursement procedures. We recommend that they
be prepared by an employee independent of cash functions.
Accounts Receivable
Revenue generated from other sources billed by the City are not
recorded until cash is received. We recommend that "other"
accounts receivables be recorded when invoices are prepared to
assure that all revenue is timely recorded and subsequently
collected. Each month the general ledger should be reconciled
with the subsidiary ledger maintained to assure the accuracy of
the receivables.
Special Assessments
Control sheets established for assessment rolls are not being
maintained adequately. Prepayments , additions, deletions, or
other changes should be entered on these sheets and they should
be balanced annually with information furnished to the City by
each county.
Grant Reimbursements
At December 31, 1982 there were several Community Development
Block Grant projects with costs which had not been submitted for
reimbursement . These projects had been previously closed and
the remaining funds reallocated to other projects. We
understand additional Council action is required to reopen these
projects and reallocate funds necessary to recover the costs
incurred. The need to take such action could be avoided in the
future by requesting funds to cover expenditures as incurred.
i
I
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of St . Anthony
• June 30, 1983
Page 3
Chart of--Accounts
The present chart of accounts is not being consistently used in
accounting for -the activity of various funds. In several
instances, different accounts are used to record the same type
of revenue within the same fund. In addition, similar
expenditures may be assigned different account classifications.
We also noted revenue and -expenditure coding errors which
required correction. We recommend the chart of accounts be
reviewed,- updated as necessary and consistently applied in
accounting for transactions.
General Fixed Assets
As previously noted, the City does not maintain fixed asset
records as required by generally accepted accounting principles .
We suggest a property ledger be maintained for City-owned
furniture and equipment. Such a ledger would:
• -aid in periodically adjusting insurance values and-----.-.
establishing proof of loss in the event of an
insurance claim;
-identify costs of assets sold or disposed;
-establish responsibility for control of assets by
departments; and
-assist in efficiently utilizing existing equipment .
Physical identification can be accomplished by attaching
prenumbered tags to the property, with the tag -numbers
corresponding to an item listed in the ledger. The ledger
should include all .pertinent information for each item of
property, such as date purchased, cost, vendor and estimated
life. Effective control can be maintained by taking a physical
inventory periodically and comparing assets with items listed. i.n.
the ledger..
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of St . Anthony •
June 30, 1983
Page 4
Other Matters
The operations of the water and sewer funds incurred losses in
1982 of approximately $33,000 each. These losses are similar to.
losses incurred in 1981. We suggest that user rates be reviewed
annually to determine the adequacy of income generated since
operating expenses have increased significantly during the past
several years. The rates charged by the City are not intended
to generate sufficient income to recover the depreciation on
contributed assets, but the rates should be sufficient to
generate income to cover other operating expenses.
During our examination, we noted that two resolutions amending
the 1982 budget were not implemented. We recommended to the
City manager that these resolutions be rescinded in 1983 and
understand this has been done.
We appreciated the cooperation extended us by the City's manager
and staff during the engagement . We would be pleased to discuss •
any of the comments further with you at your convenience.
Agenda Item: Re2orts-4a Status : Informational
MINNESOTA WASTE MANAGEMENT- BOARD
AGENDA
• SIXTY-SEVENTH REGULAR MEETING
DATE: August 24-25, 1983 (Wednesday and Thursday)
TIME: 8:00 A.M. (both days)
PLACE: Room 83, State Office Building, St. Paul
WEDNFSDAY:
8:00 A.M. GENERAL
1 . Agenda Review & Adoption
2. . Approval of Minutes - July 28, 1983
3. Chairman's Report
4: Staff Reports
5. Hazardous Waste Management Planning Council Report
6. Local Project Review Committee Reports
7. Processing Areas Task Force Report
8. Special Advisory Task Force Report
9. Items by Board Members
9:00 DISCUSSION - .Review Hearing Records 'for Proposed Processing Facility
Inventory Areas in Metropolitan area (includes up to 15
minutes of public testimony on each area).
9:00 Cottage Grove
9:30 Forest Lake
10:00 Minneapolis
CAF WXRESi --ib 10:30 St. Paul
ST ANTHONY 11 :00 Roseville
11 :30 Plymouth
12:00 RECESS FOR LUNCH
2:00 P.M. DISCUSSION (CONTINUED) - Processing Facility Hearing Records
2:00 Shakopee
2:30 Inver Grove Heights
3:00 Rosemount
3:30 Fridley
4:00 Lakeville
4:30 Hastings
5:00 Ramsey
5:35 ADJOURN
NOTE: Board members -wi11 have dinner together at 6:00 P.M. at the St. Paul
oFf-T ("Board Room") following adjournment of Wednesday's meet-i ng.
(See over for second dav)
Y Rpgs _v'ue - -
THURSDAY:
8:00 A.M. DISCUSSION - Brief Review of All Processing Facility Inventory Areas
10:00 ACTION - Adoption of Inventory of 'Preferred Areas for Processing •
Facilities in Metropolitan Area
12:00 RECESS FOR LUNCH
2:00 P.M. PRESS CONFERENCE - Room 4, State Capitol Building
3:00 ACTION - Reduction in Size of Crystalline Bedrock Study Areas
4:30 ACTION- Possible Extension of Fergus Falls' .Contingencies Deadline
5:00 TENTATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR NEXT MEETING:
Dater September 8, 1983 (Thursday) '
Time: 8:30 A.M.
Place: Tentative - State Capitol, St. Paul
5:05. ADJOURN
OTHER MEETINGS SCHEDULED:
.August 26, 1983 - Hazardous Waste Management Planning Council - 8:30 A.M. ,
. . at Board Offices, Crystal
August 31, 1983 - Processing Areas Task Force (PATF), " 1-:00 P.M. , at
Board Offices, Crystal
Sept. 9, 1983 - Solid Waste Management Advisory Council - 1 :00 P.M„ at
Board Offices, Crystal (Tentative)
Agenda Item: Reports-4b Status: Informational
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 19 , 19.83
TO: Department Heads
FROM: David Childs , City Manager
SUBJECT: Staff Meeting Notes - August 16 , 1983
The meeting began at 9 : 30 A.M. Those present were Dave Childs , Larry
Hamer, Ray Nelson, Carol Johnson, Don Hickerson, and Lee Entner .
Connie Kroeplin was absent.
Ray Nelson reported that it appears that the new liquor store at
26th and Central is cutting into the business of our off sale on
Kenzie Terrace. He has checked prices and although we are lower, the
convenience factor for many of our regular customers who live in that
area is causing them to buy closer to home.
Larry Hamer reported that :
1. The sewer line in Edward Street between 36th and 37th will be
• repaired during the next week or so. The company that does the
lining process cannot install the liner until two major breaks
in the line are .repair.ed. This means that a' small portion of the
street will still have to be dug up, but nowhere near the 390
feet which would otherwise need to be excavated if the line were
replaced. When the two repairs are completed, the line will be
retelevised and if everything is in order, the lining process will
begin shortly thereafter.
2 . The sealcoating will be swept up the week of the 15th and the sand
will be saved for ice control on the streets use this winter. It
should be noted that sealcoating was done in two phases this year.
Sand swept up from the first phase was saved for use on the second
phase. Sand swept from phase 2 will be used for ice control as
noted and sand swept up next spring from winter sanding will be
used as backfill -material for water and sewer line repairs .
Larry Hamer also mentioned pending repairs to the overhead doors at the
fire hall and to the chimney at the Stonehouse .
Carol Johnson reported that during the past several months our com-
puter service has- been. changing over to a newer machine . A few days•
ago the old computer broke down and because of the unfeasibility of
repairing it, the changeover must be made immediately . Carol stated
that she will be very busy verifying 6 month- figures for entry into
the new computer .
•
l
-2-
Don Hickerson reported some of the feedback of the police patrolmen
about the fitness program and some of their thoughts about certain
equipment. Larry Hamer reported on the excellent facilities which
the City of Fridley has in its fire department and indicated that many
of the possible items -mentioned, such as an incline board for sit-ups
could easily be constructed by the Public Works Department.
Dave Childs reported that the Ramsey County League of Local Govern-
ments will feature officials from the Metro Waste ,Control Commission
at their next meeting (8/17/83) . Because of the tremendous rate
increases faced by the City, Mr. Childs and Mr. Hamer will be attending
the meeting to gain further information.
Dave Childs also reported that the final figures for the 1984 Local
Government Aids had been received and that an additional $10 , 600
needed to be cut from the 1984 Budget proposal . He mentioned several
possible cuts in each department, which. the department heads were to
consider and respond to within the next few days .
The meeting was adjourned at 10 : 50 A.M.
•
•
• OVERTIME PAYROLL REPORT
PAYROLL DATED AUGUST 10 , 1983
Date Department Reason Hours
Police Department
7/30/83 William Ferguson DWI arrest
8/3/30 Joseph Sturdevant Court 3
8/2/83 Jeffrey Luther Court 3
8/5/83 Jeffrey Luther Court 22
7/31/83 David Johnston Burglary in progress -3/4
8/3/83 David Johnston Court 3
Total 12-3/4
Maintenance Department
7/24/83 Arvid Johnson Water in basement 2
8/5/83 Arvid Johnson Repair hydrant 1
8/1/83 Paul Reiling Repair squad car 2
8/1/83 Jerome Sauer Sweep Stinson
8/4/83 Lauren McClanahan Repair hydrant 1
8/5/83 Lauren McClanahan Repair hydrant 1
8/5/83 Lauren McClanahan Watermain break 2
• Total 8
Fire Department
7/25/83 Richard Pfeiffer Shift fill-in, vacation 12
7/27/83 Richard Pfeiffer Shift fill-in, meeting (chief) 3
7/29/83 Richard Pfeiffer Shift fill-in, school 1
7/28/83 Robert Lee Shift fill-in, vacation 12
8/4/83 Richard Johnson Shift fill-in, vacation 12
Total 82
Reserve Firemen Fill-ins for Regular Firemen @ $4 .00/Hour
Reserve fill-ins for regular firemen on vacation 1742
Reserve fill-ins for regular firemen at fire school 24-3/4
Total 1994
CBJ/cjk
U 0 0
/E •8/18/83 A C 0 0 0 N T S P A Y A B L E PAGE 1
NOOK NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK
0. TYPE DATE NO. AMOUNT
4005 ACRC—MINNESOTA INC R - 8/18/33 2833 34 .60
4006 DALE KOCH R 8/18/83 2834 396 .52
4009 AETNA LIFE C CASUALTY R 8/ 18/83 2335 439.0G
401.5 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CC R 8/18/83 2836 124.17
4055 CAPITUL CITY DISTRIBUTING R 8/ 13/83 2337 800. 85
4070 C'HR. ISTEN TPUCKING INC R• 9/ 18/83 283 ? 17 0 . E4
r.
4080 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION R 8/ 18/63 2339 50.00
4085 CITY Cr- ST ANTHONY R 3/ 18/33 2540 48 . 125 .00
4108 0 E M INC R 8/1 ?/83 2341 28 .CC
4125 EAST SIDE EEEVERAGE CC R 8/ 18/23 2342 13 .58 G .90
4.1 FLECTRO wATCHMAN INC R 9/18/63 2 34 3 233.00
4145 G4NZER DISTR ; �-UTORS INC R 8/13/33 2 ,344 7 , 39 . 90
4157 -SOLG EAGLE D1 ST CO K '3/ 1d/o3 199 . 25
4175 HAPPYS Pr-' TATO CHIP CC R ?/ ld/6? 244E 31 . 50
14205 HCME JUICE CC R 8/ 18/03 2347 48 .4`
4216 JCHNSCN RAPER 6 SUPPLY R ?/ 18/d3 2243 675 .59
4223 KERNELS CHOICE R 2/18/93 2849 132 .CC t
4236 KuFTHFR ^ iSTRI�UTING CO R 3/1 •3/? 3 2350 15 . 165 . 77
i
424b LOCAL SHCPPING R 8/13/33 2351 31a .00
4263 MAPLE GROVE HTG CG R 8/ 13/83 2952 193 .29 (_
4265 MARK V ! I SALES INC R 8/18/83 2953 109664. 50
4290 MINNEGASC R 9/18/53 2.354 76 .44
4293 MINN BAR SUPPLY R 8/19/83 2855 540 .60
43� MOVIE FACTS R 8/18/83 2356 40.00
r
4320 NELSON OFFICE SUPPLY R 8/18/33 2857 17.55
_ l
U C R
/E• 3/ 1 8/83 A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E o AG"c 2 _
NOOK NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK
0. TYKE DATE NO. A,meUNT
4335 NORTHERN STATES POWER R. 9/ 18/83 2858 29228 .00
4345 CLO DUTCH FOCCS INC R 8/18/83 2359 132.00
4355 PEPSI COLA/7 UP BCTTLINC R 8/18/83 2850 720. 50
4370 REX .DISTRIBUTING CG R 3/ 18/83 2861 17.206. 13
43a5 ROYAL rEVERAGE LIST CC R 0-/ 18/83 2 dl; 2 200 . 80
439b ROYAL CRC'wN REV R 8/18/83 2 36 3 2C2 . 10
4415 SAVOIE SUPPLY CC R 9/13/83 28o4 39 .47
4420 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC R 8/18/83 2.365 106 .00
443C SILENT KNI HT R 9/ 13/d3 23bb 39 .00
4443 STANS OCOR S-EKVICES INC K ?/Ia/33 2377 33 .83
445yL STUAPT CISTRIBUTING CC R 22/18/33 2:ib8 355 .45
4.46i SUNG KLArJG I NC R 3/ 18/33 2x.57 4 , . . 7C
4460 I u= j1AK I\'S C�;M01i En CT= 3/6 3 2?7C 124 . 62
4470 TUNBSTCN PI _ZA R 3/ 13/83 ? =71 71 . 15
4475 Tr+ IN CITY FEDERAL R 8/ 13/03 2.37. 2 2C .00
4430 TA N CITY FILT"k SEkVICE R 8/ 1 ?/d3 2373 32 .x0
4491 UNIT'= O '"AY R ?/13/33 2.374 14 .00
4493 nG MAGKFTING R 3/18/83 284 7 5 34 . 70
4494 WAANFR HARDWARE R 8/18/33 2876 17 .C9
5007 -LAECR RELATIONS ASSOC INC R 8/18/53 2.377 149 .50 '..
6008 MINN DEPT ECONOMIC SEC R 8/18/33 2872 715.57
TOTAL 1239493098 1.
w
f
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
August 23, 1983
1. Call to Order.
2 . - Roll Call .-- - -
3. Approval of June 28, 1983 H.R.A. Minutes .
4 . Presentation of Claims .
a. Dorsey &Whitney - $1, 482 . 40 .
b. Dorsey & Whitney - $1 ,980 . 00 .
5. Adjournment.
P
f,
f
j
l
F
r
r
•
k
• CITY OF ST. ANTH014Y
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT' AUTHORITY MINUTES
June 28 , 1983
Chairman Sundland called the meeting to order at 9 :10 P.M.
Present for roll , call: Sundland, Vice Chairman Letourneau; Secretary/.
Treasurer Marks; and Commissioners Ranallo and
Enrooth.
Also present: David Childs , Executive Director;, Steve Arkell of Arkand
Partnership; and Judy Makowske, Planning Commission
Representative.
Motion by Commissioner Ranallo and seconded by Vice Chairman Letourneau
to approve as submitted the minutes of- the H.R.A. meeting held June 14 ,
1983.
Motion carried unanimously .
Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Vice Chairman Let-
ourneau to approve payment of $437 to Dorsey. & Whitney for legal services
in connection with the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project.
SMotion carried unanimously.
The Executive Director indicated the condemnation resolution was
necessary so the required. lengthy mechanisms would be taken care of
should the negotiations with the property owners for the land included--
in Phase 1- of the- project become bogged down and the land not acquired
before fall.
Motion by Commissioner Enrooth and seconded by Vice Chairman Letourneau
to adopt Resolution 83-0.07, effective June 30 , 1983.
H.R.A. RESOLUTION 83-007
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF REAL PROPERTY
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Commissioner Ranallo
to adjourn the meeting at 9 : 12 P .M.
Motion . carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen Crowe , Secretary
•
i V b.. V v V
Mr. David H. Childs
Executive Director A �17Gt 19_8.3
Housing and Redevelopment
• Authority of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418
IN ACCOUNT WITH
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(INTERNAL.REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. 41-0223337)
IN RE: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony, Minnesota
(A separate Disbursement Statement is or will be rendered for our disbursements, if any, for your account.)
To legal services rendered from June 1, 1983 Amount
through June 30, 1983
• Attend 4 RA meetin $ 65 .00
Regarding Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project, including:
matters relating to notices of intent to acquire and PUD;
meetings with M. Saliterman and- R. Saliterman; meetings
with Mr. Gudim and Mr. Hance and Mr. Fox; title matters;
survey matters; condemnation petition and related
condemnation documents 1,240 .00
Total Fees $1, 305 .00
Plus disbursements per
attached statement 177.40
Total Fees and Disbursements $1,482 .40
WRS: ln
Payment due within 10 days of receipt of statement.
Disbursements made for your account, for which bills have not yet been received will appear on a later statement.
Mr. David M. Childs
Executive Director
Housing and Redevelopment August 2 19 83
• Authority of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418
IN ACCOUNT WITH
HORSEY &. WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(INTERNAL REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. 41-0223337)
IN RE: Housing and Redevelopment Authority_of St. Anthony, Minnesota
(A separate Disbursement Statement is or will be rendered for our disbursements, if any, for your account.)
To legal services rendered from May 1, 1983 Amount
through May 31, 1983
• Regarding Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project,
including: matters relating to Redevelopment Contract;
meetings with Redeveloper; title matters; and matters
regarding letter of credit
Total Fees $1,980 .00
WRS: In
Payment due within 10 days of receipt of statement.
Disbursements made for your account, for which bills have not yet been received will appear on a later statement.