HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 11132001 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
102950
Box: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 11132001
IN a
_H.R.A. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
ON CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
November 13, 2001
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
PAGE(S1_
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
3. ROLL CALL.
4. COMMUNITY FORUM.
5. ACTION ITEMS.
a. Consent Agenda.
1) Approve October 23, 2001 Regular Council
Meeting Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 8
Approve November 6, 2001 Election Canvass Minutes . . . . 9 - 10
2) Licenses/Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3) Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 17
4) Resolution 01-083, re: Adopt a flexible benefit plan . . . . . . 18 - 19
5) Ordinance 2001-003, re: Water rates (3rd reading) . . . . . . . 20 - 22
6. REVIEW ITEMS.
a. Tax Increment Financing Update (Springsted, Inc. will be
present) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 29
b. Resolution 01-084, re: Approve plans and specifications and
order advertisement for bid for 2002 street project (T. Hubmer,
WSB, Inc. will be present) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
C, Resolution 01-085, re: No-Fault Sewer Backup Coverage Option (T.
Hubmer, WSB, Inc. and Carl Bennetsen, A. J. Gallagher & Co. will
be present) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 - 38
City Council Study Session Agenda
November 13, 2001
Page 2
PAGE(S1
d. Funding options for City HalUCommunity Center
improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 -45
e. Review City Attorney's letter regarding Mayor vacancy . . . . . . . . . 46 -47
7. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.
5. Action Items.
a. Consent Agenda.
1. Approve 10/23/01 Council Minutes
2. Approve 11/06/01 Election Canvass
Minutes
2. - Licenses/permits.
3. Claims. -
b. Resolution 01-083
C., Ordinance 2001-003
1
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
. � 3 October 23, 2001
4 I. CALL TO ORDER.
5 Mayor Pro Tem.Horst called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m..
6
7 Mayor Pro Tern Horst explained that the elected Mayor Cavanaugh resigned. Mayor Pro
8 Tern Horst stated that Cavanaugh noted the desire to spend more time with family as his
9 primary reason for resigning. Mayor Pro Tern Horst stated that he would take over the
10 duties of mayor, until the Council appoints a permanent replacement to fulfill the
11 remaining two years of Cavanaugh's term.
12 Mayor Pro Tern Horst acknowledged Cavanaugh's dedication to the improvement of the
13 City of St. Anthony and stated that he would be missed.
14 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to accept the Mayor Cavanaugh's resignation.
15 Motion carried 3-1. Councilmember Sparks voted no.
16 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
17 Mayor Pro Tern Horst invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of
18 Allegiance.
19 III. ROLL CALL.
20 Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tern Horst; Councilmembers Sparks,
21 Thuesen, and Hodson.
22 Councilmembers absent: None.
23 Also present: City Manager Mike Mornson.
24 IV. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 23,2001 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
25 AGENDA.
26 Motion by Councilmember Hodson to approve the October 23, 2001 City Council
27 Regular Meeting Agenda.
28 Motion carried unanimously.
29 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
30 None.
31 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
32 Mayor Pro-temp Horst invited residents in the audience to speak to the Council on items
33 that are not on the regular agenda.
34 Resident Chris Schober, 2902 Crestview Drive, came forward to address the Council
35 regarding the Silver Point Park Project. She stated, originally,the city had decided to
36 make a holding pond in the park. Ms. Schober's desire was that the recreational skating
37 and hockey rink back at both Silver Point and Central Parks.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes z
October 23, 2001
Page 2
1 Ms. Schober referred to a petition that was signed by one hundred and seventy-five
2 students in the Middle School that requested that the skating return to both parks.
3 Ms. Schober continued with a background on the rinks and various situations with the
4 parks. She continued,that promises were made last February to re-level the park,provide
5 a warming house, and make skating good for this winter. She indicated that the Parks
6 Commission recently had to make a decision to take out another season of one of the
7 sports; hockey was the chosen sport to eliminate this year.
8 Ms. Schober stated that she wanted it in the minutes that the City Council wants hockey
9 at all three parks, so that it'does not become a debate in the future.
10 Ms. Schober stated that they needed the skating for the winter because it is the only
11 recreational outdoor activity for the City of St. Anthony. She added that traveling the
12 distance to another park takes away the independence that children have to go to the park
13 and play with their neighborhood friends.
14 Ms. Schober concluded that the issue at hand was that if the City could offer all of the
15 sports than they should. She added that the City desires skating at all three parks.
#16 Councilmember Sparks thanked Ms. Schober for her persistence in the issue. She added
17 that she wanted to go on record that the City Council supports skating in the recreational
18 parks, and that they will offer skating at all three parks in the future.
19 Councilmember Thuesen stated he was in support of them to offer skating at this time,
20 but said he could not promise that it would never be taken away due to financial issues.
21 Mayor Pro Tem Horst stated that it was in the plan to have skating and hockey at Central
22 and Silver Point Parks. He added that she could feel comfortable that this Council does
23 support youth hockey.
24 Councilmember Thuesen asked if Todd Hubmer, WSB,could come forward and address
25 the issue from an engineering perspective.
26 Hubmer indicated that last year was the first.year that the park was back in full use. He
27 stated that they discovered that the slopes out near the ice at Silver Point Park made for
28 poor ice conditions. He added that they wanted to wait until the summer sports were
29 over before they began correcting the problem.
30 Hubmer reviewed the areas that would be corrected and stated that next spring will,
31 hopefully, help the grass growth and make for better conditions for the ice, as well as the
32 other sports.
33 Councilmember Thuesen asked why it was not done correctly the first time. Hubmer
34 stated that there were a number of things that happened the first time, the mis-grading of
35 the slopes being the main problem.
3
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2001
Page 3
1 Councilmember Hodson thanked Ms. Schober for her attention to the matter, as he feels
2 it is important, as well.
3 Councilmember Sparks suggested that, given the financial realities, they pass a resolution
4 supporting the continuation of the skating program.
5 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve a resolution in support of continuing the
6 ice-skating and hockey rinks in the City parks from 2002 and on.
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8 Resident Jim Weihoff came forward and stated that he has lived in the City of St.
9 Anthony for forty years. He addressed Councilmembers Thuesen and Hodson.and began
10 asking them about the forum that took place last week. He asked what they were going
11 to do to start economizing, and how they would make City workers more efficient.
12 Councilmember Thuesen interjected and stated that he thought Mr. Weihoff s questions
13 were highly inappropriate and would not respond to Mr. Wehoff's questions.
14 Councilmember Hodson indicated that he would be happy to sit down and have coffee
15 with Mr. Weihoff regarding his questions at another time.
16 VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
17 A. Approve September 25, 2001 Regular Council Meeting Minutes.
18 Councilmember Sparks corrected Page 2; the spelling of Barb Kay to read, "Barb
19 Kiernoziak."
20 B. Licenses/Permits.
21 C. Claims.
22 D. Ordinance 2001-003, re: Water rates (2nd reading).
23 E. Wirth Companies request for a preliminary plat approval (Resolution 01-081).
24 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda, as corrected above
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26 VIII. PUBLIC HEARING.
27 None.
28 IX. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF.
29 A. General engineering report from Todd Hubmer, WSB.
30 Todd Hubmer, WSB, came forward to provide an update on the current status of
31 projects that are ongoing within the City of St. Anthony:
32 1. 29`h Avenue Street Reconstruction.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2001
Page 4
1 Hubmer stated that the 29`h Avenue Reconstruction is substantially
2 complete. He added that there may be some sod and warrantee issues-that
3 will be addressed next spring.
4 Mayor Pro Tem Horst asked about 88`'and 29`'', and if it was intended to
5 be a cross-walk in red brick,or painted. Hubmer indicated that he was
6 uncertain, and indicated that he would look into the area and the concern.
7 Councilmember Sparks asked if Hubmer would review the funding of 29'
8 Avenue. Hubmer indicated that there were two sources of funding,both
9 of which were state funding. He explained that there was a$400.00
10 assessment for the residents of 29" which paid for the stop-box and curve-
11 box at the end of the street.
12 Hubmer added that the City's Beautification Fund paid for some of the
13 street lighting improvements as well.
14
15 2. 2001 Street Reconstruction.
16 Hubmer indicated that the new storm sewer, watermain and sanitary sewer
17 repairs have been completed. He stated that the curb installation on 30'
18 Avenue will begin during the week of October 22' and asphalt will follow
19 during the week of October 29`''.
20 Hubmer stated that the driveways on Wilson Street and West Armour
21 Terrace are complete. He indicated that driveway work on 30'h Avenue
22 would begin during the week of October 29`''. He added that sod and
23 restoration work would begin during the week of October 22"a
24 3. Harding Street Pond.
25 Hubmer indicated that construction on the pond was complete. He stated
26 that plantings in the pond and seeding of the pond slopes is also complete.
27 He indicated that the maintenance period for the plantings would begin
28 next spring.
29 4. 2002 Street Reconstruction and Feasibility Study.
30 Hubmer stated that a neighborhood meeting to discuss the 2002 street
31 reconstruction final design, construction schedule, and that the City's
32 Assessment Policy is scheduled for the week of November 5, 2001.
33 Hubmer added that final plans would be presented to the City Council at
34 the November 13`'Council meeting. He stated that authorization to order
35 bids would be requested from the Council with an anticipated December
#36 bid opening.
37 5. Wellhead Protection Plan.
38 Hubmer stated that Phase I of the Wellhead Protection Plan was ongoing.
39 He stated that the initial process of collecting data has included meetings
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 5
October 23, 2001
Page 5
1 with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, City of New Brighton, and
2 the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District.
3 Hubmer stated that Phase I is anticipated to be completed during the
4 summer of 2002 and the entire Wellhead Protection Plan completed in
5 2003.
6 6. Sanitary Sewer I&I Education Program.
7
8 Hubmer stated that the foundation draintile and sump pump removal
9 program letter and brochure have been revised, and said they would be
10 sent to City Council and staff for their review and comments during the
11 week of October 22"d. He indicated that the next mailing and public
12 meeting would occur in November.
13
14 7. Silver Point Park.
15 Hubmer stated that, in order to prepare the park for the future Silver Point
16 Park building, and to address some issues within the baseball, hockey,and
17 skating areas, it was proposed that grading of Silver Point Park be
18 completed this fall.
19 Hubmer stated that the proposed grading improvements were presented to
20 the Parks Commission at their October meeting. He indicated that they
21 have also met with the park building designer to incorporate the building
22 location, utility needs and building pad elevations into the proposed
23 grading improvements. He added that, to minimize the time needed to
24 establish turf within the Silver Point Park, it was recommended that
25 skating not be provided in Silver Point Park this winter.
26 Hubmer indicated that alternative skating facilities are located at Emerald
27 Park and Sandcastle Park in Roseville.
28 H. Change Order#1 relating to 2001 Street Improvements.
29 Motion by Councilmember Hodson to approve Change Order#1 relating to Street
30 Improvements.
31 Motion carried unanimously.
32
33
34 I. Review community survey questions with Decision Resources (Resolution 01-
35 082).
36 Mornson stated that the community survey was a proposal that the City Council
37 has been discussing for the past year. He stated it would be a city survey only,
38 last done in 1998. A City survey had also been done in 1993.
39 Morrison stated that the estimated cost to complete the survey was $10,000 would
40 be paid for by the Cable Communication budget.
41 Jim Prosser, Ehlers and Associates, was present to answer any necessary
42 questions that may arise this evening surrounding the survey.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 6
October 23, 2001
Page 6
1 Mayor Pro Tern Horst asked how the survey went from being seventy questions
2 to over one hundred questions. Prosser indicated that the additional questions
3 were mentioned by members of the Council. He added that Decision Resources
4 was more than comfortable to strike any questions that they did not want to be on
5 the survey.
6 Councilmember Thuesen asked if there were any risks involved with having
7 additional questions. Prosser stated that there is an attempt to limit questions in
8 order to not exceed the period of comfort. He indicated that the survey for the
9 City of St. Anthony was well within the comfort zone.
10 Councilmember Thuesen asked if Prosser was comfortable that the City has
11 covered their bases with the questions contained in the survey. Prosser stated
12 that,generally,there was plenty of material in the survey. He added that they
13 might want to add a few more questions that will indicate how the residents feel
14 about re-development.
15 Prosser added that it was better to focus in on several key issues when doing these
16 surveys and to do them more frequently.
17 Councilmember Hodson asked if surveying four hundred residents was sufficient.
18 Prosser indicated that surveying four hundred residents gives them a margin of
19 error that is comfortable with those types of surveys.
20 Councilmember Thuesen asked about questions 39-43, wondering with the drastic
21 changes that are taking place. Prosser stated that if the Council does not feel the
22 information is useful at this time, then do not include it.
23 Councilmember Sparks agreed that questions 39-42 could be either eliminated,or
24 condensed into one question. The Council agreed to strike questions 39-42 from
25 the survey.
26 Councilmember Sparks stated they could strike questions 48-63 because the
27 liquor stores are not an issue for the City at this time.
28 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he thought the results would be helpful for
29 Mike Larson, Liquor Manager, to help him with his decisions that will result in
30 the highest possible profits.
31 Councilmember Sparks stated she thought it was still excessive. Councilmember
32 Hodson stated that they could remove a few questions, but agreed with
33 Councilmember Thuesen that the information could be valuable.
34 The Council concluded that questions 48-63, regarding liquor could be
35 condensed.
36 Mayor Pro Tern Horst expressed concern with questions 64-75 regarding the
37 Stonehouse. Prosser suggested that they drop 64-75. The Council agreed.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2001
Page 7
1 Councilmember Sparks referred to the wording of 45 and 46. She suggested that
2 they read"replacement of the Fire Station and Public Works facility," instead of
3 new. Prosser indicated that the introduction to the question could be added to
4 read"...age and adequacy of the current Fire Station and Public Works facility."
5 Councilmember Thuesen suggested that question number 46 add office work
6 area, as well.
7 Council concluded that they liked the wording of replacement better than new.
8 Mayor Pro Tern Horst referred to question 20. The Council discussed the options.
9 They concluded that the question needed to be prefaced with a statement
10 regarding recreational programs.
11 Councilmember Sparks indicated that questions 10-12 could be combined into
12 one.
13 Mayor Pro Tern Horst asked about questions 34-35, and what they are looking
14 for. Prosser indicated that they do want to see how much contact they have, as
15 well as the level of satisfaction.
#16 Councilmember Thuesen referred to question 36.
17 Councilmember Sparks 31 and 32. She suggested that they drop Mayor from the
18 questions and make it read City Council only.
19 Councilmember Sparks asked about question 21, and if it was referring to code
20 enforcement. Prosser stated that they needed to think about how the residents
21 would view the question.
22 Mayor Pro Tern Horst asked the Council if they wanted to view the completed
23 Community Survey before they approve it. Councilmember Hodson suggested
24 that they entrust the professionals to make the requested changes. Council
25 agreed.
26 Motion by Councilmember Hodson to approve Resolution 01-082, with changes
27 to the proposal as amended.
28
29 ; Motion carried unanimously.
30 Councilmember Sparks and the rest of the Council thanked Prosser for his work
31 and input.
32 X. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
33 None.
34 XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
35 Mornson indicated that there was a break-in last night at Liquor Store number two, as well as
36 other buildings. He indicated that an individual was apprehended at around 4:00 a.m.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2001
Page 8
1 Mornson reminded the Council that there was a joint meeting with the School Board next
2 Monday evening, October 29, at 7:00 p.m. He stated that they would be updating the School
3 Board on various city projects, as well as discussing future capital needs of both the School
4 Board and the City Council.
5 Mornson indicated that on November 13`x,they would be receiving a report from Springsted
6 Associates, as well as the City's Finance Department discussing the impacts that the property tax
7 laws will have on the tax increment districts. He indicated that they do have some tax increment
8 funds left. He encouraged the Council to give some thought to the subject.
9 Councilmember Thuesen asked if they should be looking at funding from some of the other
10 sources that they have considered. Mornson stated that was a possibility, tax increment funds
11 would be expiring soon.
12 Mornson stated that they have received several phone calls from people interested in the details
13 of the Mayors resignation. He indicated that they would be putting a press release together and
14 would inform the Council of their options for the process to select a new Mayor. The options for
15 the City Council to consider will be discussed at the next City Council meeting on November 13,
16 2001.
#17 . XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
18 Councilmember Hodson stated that he would like to be aware of the City of St. Anthony's
19 policies on bio-contamination. He indicated that the City had some things that were in place of
20 which residents should be aware.
21 Mayor Pro Tem Horst thanked the Chamber of Commerce for having the Candidates Forum last
22 week. Lastly, Mayor Pro Tem Horst encouraged everyone to get out and vote.
23 XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
24 Motion by Councilmember Hodson to adjourn the meeting at 8:08 p.m.
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26 Respectfully submitted,
27 Courtney Seesz
28 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
29
30 Mayor Pro Tem
31 ATTEST:
32 City Clerk
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
MINUTES OF CANVASS OF CITY ELECTION RESULTS
November 6, 2001
The meeting was called to order at 8:32 pm for the purpose of canvassing the November 6, 2001
City Election results.
Present: Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, Hodson
Absent: None
The following report was presented to the Canvassing Board:
2001 ELECTION RESULTS
Office Precinct 1 H Precinct 2H Precinct 1 R Total
Councilmember (Vote for 2)
R. Hodson 189 414 114 717
M. Lundgren 183 304 99 586
D.'Roadfeldt 159 227 90 476
B. Thuesen 187 394 129 710
Write-Ins 10 13 1 24
The total number of votes cast is 1,394.
Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve and certify to Hennepin and Ramsey Counties the
City of St. Anthony election results of November 6, 2001.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adjourn the meeting at .8:35 pm.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk
1®
Minutes of Canvassing Board for
November 6, 2001 City Election
Page 2
Mayor krn
ATTEST:
Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I certify that this is a true and accurate
copy of the City of St. Anthony records.
H.0I-t,
Date City er
11
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: November 13, 2001 Approval:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
Heating License:
Total Refrigeration Systems Inc., So. St. Paul, MN
General Contractors License:
Pioneer Tree & Landscape Inc., Pietz, MN
Cigarette Retail License:
Walgreens - 3700 Silver Lake Road
12
FiRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLf
T 077'20 h e c F;-R e g i s t e r L-540 R--V0�27-PAGE-
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
000020--AA-BATTERY-CO 6-174-i 1 1�/0 3. 13 X57
007252 ALBRECHT 16175 1. 1/14/01 21 , 106.97
- 008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL_ 16176 11/14/01 300.00
-- 005201--AMERICAN-STORE 15177-1-17-14/-01
- 008292 ARNDT/ANNE_ 16178 1. 1/14/01. 104 .00
008511 AT & T WIRELESS 16179 11/14/01 94.05
004271 AT&T-BRO-ADBAND
008579 BAGGENSTOSS/VIRGINIA 16181 1. 1/14/01 104.00
- 008580 BAUER/MARY 16182 11/14/01. 107 .25
--.0Cr0O� HORYS7DALE
_ 55183-i-1-Tr416i----- 50:00-
- 007168 BOYER FORD TRUCKS, INC . 16184 11/1A 40 J. 26.33
007253 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO 16185 1. 1/14/01 128.58
00()-4.30 BRIGHTON-AUTL7-ECECTF7I 86-1-l- 4101 I-1-0.23
008746 CARGILL INC SALT DIVISIO 16187 11/14/01 4,941 .55
008728 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. 16188 11/1.4/01. 10.28
008-652--CARTR`I-DGE CARE-- 16-t89-1-1-Yi4/0-1- -T03-6�---
- 007386 CASTLE INSPECTION SERVIC 16190 11/14/01 3,834 . 14
000610 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANS SVC 16191 1. 1/14/01 247.86
-- 004065 C ENT RAL_-LOCK&-SAFE-CO ---161-92-11%-14/01.-----------112:50----
008644 CHAMPPS AMERICANA 16193 1. 1/14/01 92.66
008577 CITY OF ST. PAUL 16194 11/14/01. 626.05
-008295----CLEMENS/KATHLYN -
004107 COMPTON 'S COMMERCIAL CLN 16196 11/14/01 3,834.00
008736 CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT 16197 1. 1/14/01 798.66
-- --005234-- CRYSTEEL-TRUCK-EQUIPMENT--------16-198-1-1/1'4/01.- -----6-634--37----
008743 DELL MARKETING, INC . 16199 11/14/01 499.43
008429 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF 16200 11/1.4/01 510.00
---- .0000-1-----DI-VERSIFIED-CRYOGEI\IICS--.----- --16201- 1. 1./14/01----.-.-----215:90---
-- 000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 16202 11/14/01. 5,517 .70
008809 ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 16203 11/14/01 52.07
- 008284- ELECTION-SYSTEMS-&-SOFTW------1-6204-1-1/1 itl01.-----1-r-455-.'-26
-
- .00002 EMERGENCY LITE SERVICE 16205 11/14/01 23.82
-- 008842 FABYANSKE, WESTRA & HART 16206 11/14/01. 1 ,387 .50
--- 008153 F-ILTERFRSH ---16207-1-1/1-4/0-1------ -72.-58---
- 008221 FOSTER,WENTZELL,HEDBACK, 16208 11/14/01. 4,000.00
- 008647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 16209 1. 1/14/01 101 . 48
---- -00.1025----G-&-K-SERVICES --------16210-1:-1/1-4701:-- -
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 16211 1. 1/14/01 705.70
- 001145 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 16212 11/14/01. 24.48
_..._...-- 008584 -. --_--GOODEN/LII\tDA - ---- -- -- -- -- ..--16213---l-1/-1-4701 --- - - - --94.-25---
001180 GOODIN COMPANY 16214 11/ 1.4/01. 40. 12
007147 GOODYEAR BRAD REGAN 1621.5 1. 1714701 157.933
001250 GRAINGER INC/W W 16217 1. 1/14/01 125.00
001410 HARMON GLASS 16218 11/14/01. 1 ,087 .007
-- --005121 - HARTMAN/JAY - - --- ---- - - - - - 16219-11/14/01- 62. 15 --
001420 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 16220 11/ 14/01 316 .45
008699 HEWITT/JOEL 16221 1. 1/14/01 19 1 .54
13
}iRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLF
riy07-y'2001-1Z . Ct a cF-Regisrter GL540R=V06.27-PAGE---
- BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
008252 - HOME-DEPOT=GECF 26222•-1-1.7-14,--10.1.-- 230.53-
008299 INHOFER/MARY LOUISE 16223 11/14/01 129.50
- 008826 INTERNATIONAL POLICE MOU 16224 11/ 14/01 120.00
-00002 I VEY/JAMES-- --
008301 KLUCAS/NANCY 16226 11/14/01 104.00
008585 LACOUNT/LESLIE 16227 11/14/01 61 .75
00004 L-AFLEURf KARL -1622£3-1 i.t 1410 is -5-00--
- .00003 LANTOS/RHIANNON 16229 11/14/01 10.00
- 001980 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 16230 11/ 14/01. 250.00
00879-1 -LEAH-KLUZ-DESIG 16231-i.--1/-r4/01-- ---900.-00 -
008167 LYNN PEAVEY CO. 16232 11/14/01 100. 40
002100 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT CO 16233 11/14/01 48.45
-008302- MADDEN/MA Z-JORIE -x6234-i 171 /Oi: 15.50
.00005 MCCAREN DESIGNS, INC . 16235 . 11/14/01 703.99
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC . TEC 16236 11/14/01 1 ,759 .32
---0082-45-----METRO-FIRE---. --l-6237-1-11,14Y - 1_12-37--
002240 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 16238 11/14/01. 50,366 .33
.00008 MINNEHAHA FALLS 16239 11/14/01 5,587.50
-- --008269-- MINNESGTA-SHREDDI-Nr-LLC-- -- ---16240--11/1-4701-----------54.95 -
002360 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY 16241 1. 1/14/01 51 .27
008341 MONSON/JUDY 16242 11/ 14/01.. 50.00
- ---008686---MUSKA-ELECTRIC--CO,------- -------16243-i:1:/14/01----- --------655:25- -
- .00006 NGUYEN/JOSEPH 16244 11/ 14/01. 15 .00
002630 NORTH STAR TURF INC 16245 11/14/01 62.25
---008820----NORTHERN-TRAFFIC-SUPPLY - -----1 6246-1-1/1-4/0 i. --------- 219.81--
- 000045 OFFICE DEPOT 16247 11/14/01 445.00
008277 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 16248 11/14/01 37 .44
- ---- -00-7`226--------OL-SON-- S _PLUMBING------------------ -----i:6249--i.-1/14/01---- - _ ---42.5,-00---
008589 PANNING/CAROL 16250 11/ 14/01. 94.25
- 008811 PARK CONSTRUCTION 16251 1. 1/14/01 142, 745.97
-
---008633 I PARTS--PLUS-ROSEVILLE -----------16252-1-1/1-4/0
- 008688 PAUL/JAMES 16253
11/14/01 107.25
008594 PETERBILT NORTH 16254 11/ 14/01 24.67
-- -00007----PETERSONI/BEN _-_-_-._._-_-_.16255--1-1:/14V01.-_,________-_..-__.20--00----
OOB590 PETERSON/CHARLENE 162_56 .11/ 14/01. 104.00
002860 PFEIFFER/RICHARD 16257 11/14/01 4.04.34
--------0070.x7- -P R A X A I R -- =---- ------ ---16258--l-I/ 14/ -----99-:-02 -
008372 QWEST INTEPRISE AMERICA, 16259 11/14/01 49.95
008414 RAMSEY COUNTY 16260 11/ 14/01. 2,222.68
--518e50 ---
008426 RC IDENTIFICATIONS, INC , 16262 11 /1.4/01. 5.33
0023 80 RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC 16263 11/14/01 986.89
- -- ---008305-------SCHWAAB/MARY- - - --- - - -- - --- - -16264--11/ 14/01 ...104_:00
003350 SEH-RCM 16265 11/14/01 1 ,687. 43
.00006 SHAW/STEWART LUMBER 16266 11 /14/01 245.26
003155 ST--ANTHONY--FIRE--RELIEF-- A 1-6267 1. 1/14/01 68.63
001810 ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE_ KIWA 16268 1. 1/ 1.4/01. 147 .00
008846 STANTON GROUP 16269 1. 1/14/01 177. 4.9
14
RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLF
{Y7yzOp*�2: ChI cI:-Re g i s-te r GL54dR=V06-.27-PAGE —
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
—X034-90 STREICHER-'S 15270-1-1/14707:
- 008608 SURVIVALINK 16271 11/14/01 121 .00
008306 TAYLOR/VALERIE 16272 11/14/01. 113.75
- ?0$700----TC-WEE;-1 ECH- - —I62.73-1'L7"1471-- T50-Od--
007337 TIMF_SAVER OFF SITE SECRE 16274 11/14/01. 475.00
- 008018 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 16275 1. 1/14/01 2, 171 .41
-- 008695 -TWIN-CITIE=S-TRANSPORT-AN —16276-1 17'141-01. 217.-2E,---
.00005 UNITED RENTALS INC 16277 11/14/01 140. 19
008264 URS BRW 16278 11/14/01. 15,328.00
- —0037'10-----VAN -O---LITE -INC-
008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 16280 11/14/01 842.93
- 004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 16281 i. 1/14/01 260.77
-,- 002680 XCEL ENERGY 'r6292--1-1-/-r4--/'0-j. 4-563:14 --
- 003820 ZAHL EQUIPMENT COMPANY 16283 11/14/01 6.42
- 008492 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC 16284 1. 1/14/01 909.51
BREMER BANK NA 308,681 .62
l,S
Ei RC FINANCIAL_ SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY V I L-.LAG-
1 01/2001 --11 - -- - - --- --- ---- ChecE;- Register --- - - - ----GL540R—V06a27 PAGE
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIOR, LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
--._._._--008845 -----HE A TL:AND.- PAYMENT- SYSTEM - - 1951E3 10/31/01 ; - 50.00
000243 ALL.IANC:E TOBACCO CORP 19we 10/31/01 429.00
008944 GROTTA/DAVE 19870 10/31/01 3,609.50
-------008524 - DE:PARTMENT -OF -COMMERCE---- .,--. - 19371 --10/31/01 -- 100.00
004400 ST ANTHONY LIQUOR #1 19872 10/31 /01. 266 .66
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19873 10/31/01 8,000.00
-----008800 - - - BREMER -BANK NA -- - -- 19874 10/31/01 15,000. 00
003716 SCENE/THE 19875 10/31/01 130.00
004250 LUNDGP.EN/MATTHEW H. 19376 10/31/01 150. 00
.- ----004141--- F-RITZ -COMPANY;---INC . 19877- 10/31/01 1 ,823 e 87
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19878 10/31/01 81000 .00
003800 BREMER BANK, NA 19879 10/31/01 15,000.00
--------- 00871 6 ----- --SCENE/THE----- .. - - - - - ..__...--._ . .. - --19880--10/31./01 . _ . ___ ___130 .00
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19881 10/31/01 150.00
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 1938E 10/31/01 3,680.04
-008800 BREMER -BANK NA 19883 10/31/01 . 8000.00
008600 BREMER BANK NA 19834 10/31/01 15,000 . 00
008716 SCENE/THE 19585 10/31/01 130.00
... .. - 004250 - L.UNDGREN/{MATTHEW H,. 19886 10/31/01 - 150 . 00
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 19887 10/31/01 1 , 40a.22
008300 BREMER BANK NA 19883 10/31/01 8;000 .00
008800 BRE:MEP, BANK NA 19889 10/31/01 15, 000.00
008716 SCENE/THE 19390 10/31./01. 130, 00
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19891 10Y31101. 150.00
004141 FRITZ COMPANY. INC . 19392 10/31/01 2,905 . 27
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 19893 10/31/01 2, 104.09
004229 LAR SON/MICHAEL 19394 10/3:1/01. 138 .29
008770 PORTER/WILLIAM 19895 10/31/01 67.00
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 109,704 .94 :�
���
�m��
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLA'
1fO�f2OO�--15:-----------`--~---Check-Register ------------GL54OR=VO6!27-PAGE
` �~ BANK VENDOR - CHECK# DATE AMOUNT'
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
------008458 ''--ACCESS' 'CASH'INTERNATIONA'-----' 7 -19581-11/14�O1�--'- -' '-�21�. O9 -
008311 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRI 19582 11/14/01 3,041 .86
004225 ALLIANT FOODSERVICE 19583 11/ 14/01 3,581 .76
-------OO4O14---' ALLIED-PAPER -19584-11/14/01 - - -
004015 AMERIPRIDE LINEN 19585 11/ 14/01 498 .36
008794 ARCTIC GLACIER ICE 19586 11/14/01 789. 81
----'008692 -- AT&T-BROADBAND '19587 11Y14/O1 - - --- -151'.28 -
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 19588 11/14/01 1 ,813.39
008827 BLACKEY 'S BAKERY 19589 11/14/01 115. 88
- --- 004080----CHISA6O LAKES-DISTw-CO; ;-'--- 1959O 11/14/O1----'---41588:OO--
'
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 19591 11/ 14/01 808 .07
008814 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE 19592 11/14/01 34. 08
'-----004095- -'COCA-COLA 'BOTTLING--- ----- - 19593 11/14/01--- ---1�454�49 -
004107 COMPTON 'S COMMERCIAL CLN 19594 11/14/01 639. 00
008736 CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT 19595 11/ 14/01 412 .75
- - - - 608557 DAILEY'DATA &'ASSOCIATES- - 19596 11f14/01 - T,260.00
004120 EAGLE WINE CO 19597 11/ 14/01 1 ,446 .70
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 19598 11/14/01 46, 722 .02
--'
004130 ECOLAB -' - 19599 11/ 14/01 149. O5
008537 ENVIROMATIC CORP OF AMER 19600 11/14/01 219. 39
008647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 19601 11/ 14/01 8 .50
001030 G & K `SERVICES INC 19602 11/14/01 - 572.15
004157 GETTMAN HOWIE, INC . 19603 11/ 14/01 74 . 15
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC . 19604 11/14/01 825 .99
-
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC ' 19605 - 11/ 14/01 - 9,060 . 42
004201 HEGGIES PIZZA 19606 11/14/01 226. 65
004207 HOHENSTEIN 'S, INC 19607 11/ 14/01 3,461 .50
004220 JOHNSON BROS. LIQ. 19608 11/14/01 10, 364 .30
004218 JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY C 19609 11 / 14/01 441 . 40
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 19610 11/14/01 55 , 708. 35
001980 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES ' 19611 11/ 14/01 - 5O. 00
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPApE 19612 11/14/01 460.00
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 19613 11/ 14/01 22,526 .24
- -008263 MCLEOD USA, INCi - TEC 19614 11 /14/01 -'--668. 71
004312 MINNCOMM 19615 11 / 14/01 42 ' 55
004299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO. 19616 11/14/01 10!56
b04334 NORTHEASTER 19617 11/ 14/01 168 . 30
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 19618 11/14/01 52.32
004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 19619 11/ 14/01 1 ,407 . 00
004355 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 19620 11/14/01 447.26
004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 19621 11/ 14/01 9,351 . 30
008770 PORTER/WILLIAM 19622 11/14/01 67. 00
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 19623 11/ 14/01 2, 137 . 93
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 19624 11/14/01 24, 689. 27
008219 QWEST DEX 19625 11/ 14/O1 709 .90
oil, OO8597 R. D. HANSON ASSOC . , INC . 19626 11/14/01 153 . 75
OO8846 STANTON GROUp � 19627 11 / 14/O1 163 . 48
004468 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 19628 11/14/01 257 ' 69
17
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST . ANTHONY VILLF
dit 11107/2001----15: ------------------------------------Chuck:--Re�3ister .__.- ----... _- .------GL54OR=V06:27 PAGE.
FLANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE _ _ AMOUNT-
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
- ---004475-- -.- TRI--TECH.--DISPENSING------ - --09629 11/14/01
0OSS24 TRI-COUNTY BEVERAGE, INC 19630 11/14/01 35.90
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 19631 11/14/01 327 . 43
-- ---WINE- MERCHANTS-INC - _ ---- - -- -19632-1111T/01----------683;82
004499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC . 19633 11/ 14/01. 177 .00
CHECKING -ACCOUNT - -----..._-._.._..._.._ .__ _ .. ._. - .. . - 21312 :2.36
18
CITY OF ST. A NTHONY
RESOLUTION 01-083
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN
WHEREAS, City of St Anthony previously adopted the City of St Anthony
Flexible Benefits Plan on January 1, 1991;
WHEREAS, City of St Anthony desires to amend and restate such Plan to include
full flex provisions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the City of St Anthony Flexible
Spending Accounts Plan be and the same is amended,restated and adopted in the
form presented to the City Council, effective as of January 1, 2002;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that any proper members of the City Council are
hereby authorized to make such contributions from the funds of the City as are
necessary to carry out the provisions of said plan at any time; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the event any conflict arises between the
provisions of said Plan and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (ERISA) or any other applicable law or regulation(as such law or regulation
may be interpreted or amended),the City shall resolve such conflict in a manner
which complies with ERISA or such law or regulation.
Adopted this day of , 2001.
Mayor Pro Tern
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
19
STANTON
October 29,2001 _ _ _. _ _ GROUP —
Mr. Roger Larson
City of St Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St Anthony, MN 55418
Dear Mr. Larson:
Enclosed please find:
• The City of St Anthony Flexible Benefit Plan Document and Summary Plan
Description.
• The Resolution of the City Council
• The Administrative Services Agreement
• IRS Publications 502 and 503
The Plan Document and Summary Plan Description have been prepared for review by you and
your legal counsel. Once.reviewed, please have the appropriate person sign the last page of
the Plan Document, and retain it for your files. I have enclosed an extra copy of the signature
page to be signed and returned to us.
After the City Council has met and formally adopted the Plan, please forward a signed copy of
the Resolution to Stanton Group.
Please have the appropriate person sign the Administrative Services Agreement and return it to
Stanton Group as soon as possible. IRS Publications 502 and 503 are for your files. As contract
administrator of your FSA plan, we will use these publications for guidance.
Both Yvonne Johnson and I thank you for accepting the Stanton Group Flexible Spending
Account administration proposal. We are looking forward to working with City of St Anthony.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at(763)278-4278.
Sincerely,
Michelle L. Conger
FSA Installation Specialist
Cc: Susan Henry
. Enclosures
3405 Annapolis Lane North • Minneapolis, MN 55447 www.stanton-group.com • 763-278-4000 • fax 763 278-4007
20
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ORDINANCE 2001-003
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATER RATES,
AMENDING SECTION 610.02 OF THE 1993
ST. ANTHONY CODE OF ORDINANCES
The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains:
Section 1. Section 610:02 is amended to read as follows:
610.02 Water Rates. Water bills will be computed quarterly based on metered water used at the rate
of$1.10 per 100 cubic feet or any fraction thereof.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in effect as of the date of its publication.
First Reading: October 9, 2001
Second Reading: October 23, 2001
Adopted: November 13, 2001
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
November 21, 2001
21
. MEMORANDUM
— - - - DATE:- October 1,2002- - - - — - - - -
TO: Mike Morrison,City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson,Finance Director
ITEM: 2002 WATER/SEWER RATES
The Public Works Director has submitted a 2002 water-operating budget of$432,600 and a sewer-
operating budget of$739,900.
Based on the approval of those budgets, I have completed an analysis to determine if a rate increase
is necessary to balance these operating budgets. The results are as follows:
Water: (Increase is necessary)
In 2002, it is anticipated that St. Anthony will sell 40,750,000 cubic feet of water. Calculating the
estimated 2002 water sales (40,750,000 divided by 100 x $1.07) shows a total estimated income of
$436,000.
Expenditures of $432,600 plus the water filtration transfer of $15,200 requires revenues to'total
$447,800, which indicates a moderate increase (3 cents per 100 cubic feet) is necessary to balance
the 2002 water operating budget.
Recommendation_
The present rate of $1.07 per 100 cubic feet is not sufficient to balance the 2002 water-
operating budget. Staff recommends the ordinance (Section 610 — Water, Subdivision
#610.02)be amended to reflect a 2002 rate of $1.10 per 100 cubic feet.
Sewer: (Increase is necessary)
Currently, sanitary sewer disposal costs the residents $2.02 per 100 cubic feet. Based on Metro
Waste's estimate of flowage, sewer charges will be' based on disposal of 35,575,000 cubic feet of
sanitary waste.
Calculating the estimated 2002 sewer revenue (35,575,000 divided by 100 X $2.02) shows a total
income of $718,600. Projected expenditures of $739,900 produces a deficit of ($18,800) and an
increase is necessary to balance the sewer-operating budget. A rate increase of $ .06 cents per
100cf is necessary to finance the 2002 budget. (35,575,000 divided by 100 X$2.08=$739,900).
In 1988, the City Council passed an ordinance relating to sewer rates and charges. This ordinance
allows'for changes in the sewer rates without amending the ordinance. The rate increase is
handled admistratively and requires no Council action.
22
Cn ig 2001 to 2002 rates
Average Quarterly Utility Bill:
2800 CCF of water
Increase
2001 2002 Per Quarter
Water $ 29.96 $ 30.80 $ .84
Sewer $ 1.68
$ 86.52 $ 89.04 $ 2.52
$10.08 Annual
2.91%
6. Review Items.
a. TIF update
b. Resolution 01-084
C. Resolution 01-085
d. Funding options for City Hall/Community Center
e. City Attorney's letter regarding Mayor vacancy
23
® MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 7, 2001
TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: TIF CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
On June 30, Governor Jesse Ventura signed into law historic tax relief and property tax
reform. Changes were made to the Class Rates, which impacted St. Anthony's Tax
Increment Finance Districts.
Based on those legislative changes, Springsted prepared a TIF Cash Flow Analysis. The
following is a summary,of our TIF Districts:
Kenzie Terrace (#1950)
➢ Annual Tax Increment—2001 $452,590
® ➢ Annual Tax Increment - 2002 $423,628-
> Community Center Bond Payment ($246,588)
➢ Annual Surplus $177,040
➢ District Expires 2008
➢ Debt Paid off 2010
➢ In 2008, remaining Fund Balance $2,086,755
is paid to County (City receives
approximately 25 —30% back).
Apache/Cub Foods (#9-G)
➢ Annual Tax Increment - 2001 $231,279
➢ Annual Tax Increment - 2002 $122,084
➢ Apache Bond Payment ($205,922)
➢ Annual Deficit ($ 83,838)
➢ 1 St year of Deficit 2005
➢ Debt paid off 2013
➢ Cumulative Deficit in 2013 ($734,657)
➢ District Expires 2019
➢ Developers agreement with Super Valu
® (Permits City to bill Super Valu for deficits).
➢ Use Kenzie Terrace surplus increment.
24
• Apache/Hellickson Dental (#1-H)
➢ Annual Tax Increment - 2001 " $22,369
➢ Annual Tax Increment - 2002 $11,833
➢ Pay-As-You Go Note—Payment ($11,833).
➢ Annual Surplus/Deficit $ - 0 -
➢ Debt Paid Off (Extended 4 Years) 2010
➢ District Expires 2019
Chandler (#58)
➢ Annual Tax Increment—2001 $ 247,104
➢ Annual Tax Increment - 2002 $ 166,309 "
➢ Supports TIF Budget $1,900,000
➢ District Expires 2011
➢ Funds Available through 2011 $1,768,406
➢ Deficit ($ 131,594)
➢ Revision is necessary:
Current TIF Budget:
S/W Quadrant " $1,125,000
Lots/Twin City Federal $ 75,000
Kentucky Fried Chicken $ 500,000
Apache Plaza Redevelopment 200,000
Total TIF Budget $1,900,000
Budget Amendment/Revisions:
S/W Quadrant $
Lots/Twin City Federal $
Kentucky Fried Chicken $
Apache Plaza Redevelopment $
Hardies Building $ 319,000
Exhaust Pro's $
Phillip 66 Station $
Revised TIF Budget $1,760,000
•
Projected Tax Increment Report
St.Anthony Village
Kenzie Housing#1950
Scenario A
i
Less: Less: Retained Times: Less: Less: Community. Cummulative
Annual Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Admin. Annual Center Balance
Period Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Retainage Net Debt TIF
Ending Capacity(a) Capacity 0.0000% (b) Capacity Rate(c) Increment 0.25%/0.4259/6 (d) 5.00% Revenue Service Revenue
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1,134,649
12/31/01 379,880 31,830 0 348,050 137.223% 477,605 1,194 23,821 452,590 246,588 1,340,651
12/31/02 374,695 19,305 0 355,390 126.010% 447,827 1,903 22,296 423,628 246,588 1,517,691
12/31/03 374,695 19,305 0 355,390 126.010% 447,827 1,903 22,296 423,628 246,588 1,694,731
12/31/04 374,695 19,305 0 355,390 126.0100/6 447,827 1,903 22,296 423,628 246,588 1,871,771
12/31/05 374,695 19,305 0 355,390 126.010% 447,827 1,903 22,296 423,628 246,588 2,048,811
12/31/06 374,695 19,305 0 355,390 126.010% 447,827 1,903 22,296 423,628 246,588 2,225,851
12/31/07 374,695 19,305 0 355,390 126.010% 447,827 1,903 22,296 423,628 246,588 2,402,891
12/31/08 374,695 19,305 0 355,390 126.010% 447,827 1,903 22,296 423,628 246,588 2,579,931
12/31/09 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0 246,588 2,333,343
12/31/10 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0 246,588 2,086,755
12/31/11 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/12 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/13 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0 -
12/31/14 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/15 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.0100/6 0 0 0 0
12/31/16 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/17 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/18 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/19 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31120 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/21 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.010% 0 0 0 0
12/31/22 374,695 374,695 0 0 126.0109/6 0 0 0 0
$3,612,394 $14,515 $179,893 $3,417,986
(a)Assume 0 percent annual growth in Total Net Tax Capacity.
(b)Fiscal disparities not applicable.
(c)Frozen Tax Rate of N/A applies to this district.
(d)State Auditor Deduction projected to increase from 0.25%in Pay 2001 to 0.425%in Pay 2002 and after.
Prepared by:Springsted Incorporated(printed on 10/15/01 at 12:59 PM) TIF District(Kenzie#1950).xls Texlnc
Projected Tax Increment Report
St.Anthony Village
Apache Plaza 1 TIF District#9G
Scenario A
Less: Less: Retained Times: Less: Less: Cummulative
Annual Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual' State Aud. Admin. Annual Cub Balance
Period Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Retainage Net Bonds TIF
Ending Capacity(a) Capacity 21.7949% (b) Capacity Rate(c) Increment 0.25-/./0.425% (d) 5.00% Revenue 1996A Revenue
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
246,042
12/31/01 270,886 49,093 48,340 173,453 140.708% 244,062 610 12,173 231,279 205,922 271,399
12/31/02 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 187,561
12/31/03 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 103,723
12/31/04 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 19,885
12/31/05 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (63,953)
12/31/06 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (147,791)
12/31/07 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (231,629)
12131/08 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (315,467)
12/31/09 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (399,305)
12/31/10 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (483,143)
12/31/11 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (566,981)
12/31/12 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (650,819)
12/31/13 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084 205,922 (734,657)
12131/14 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084
12/31/15 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084
12/31/16 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084
12/31/17 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.4900/6 129,059 549 6,426 122,084
12/31/18 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.4900/6 129,059 549 6,426 122,084
12/31/19 159,874 29,408 28,435 102,031 126.490% 129,059 549 6,426 122,084
12/31/20 159,874 159,874 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/21 159,874 159,874 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/22 159,874 159,874 0 0 126.490% 0 1 0 0 1 0
$2,567,124 $10,492 $127,841 $2,428,791
(a)Assume 0 percent annual growth in Total Net Tax Capacity.
(b)Fiscal disparities applicable.
(c)Frozen Tax Rate of N/A applies to this district.
(d)State Auditor Deduction projected to increase from 0.25%in Pay 2001 to 0.4250/6 in Pay 2002 and after.
Prepared by:Springsted Incorporated(printed on 10/15/01 at 1:00 PM) TIF District(Apache Plaza 1#9G).xls Taxtnc
Projected Tax Increment Report
St.Anthony Village
Apache Plaza 2 TIF District#1 H
Scenario A
Less: Less: Retained Times: Less: Less: Cummulative
Annual Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Admin. Annual PAYGO Balance
Period Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Retainage Net Debt TIF
Ending Capacity(a) Capacity 21.7949% (b) Capacity Rate(c) Increment 0.25%/0.425% (d) 10.00% Revenue Service Revenue
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
12/31/01 25,465 2,822 4,935 17,708 140.708% 24,917 62 2,486 22,369 22,369 0
12/31/02 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/03 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/04 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/05 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.4909/6 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/06 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/07 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/08 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/09 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833' 0
12/31/10 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833 11,833 0
12/31/11 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/12 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/13 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/14 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.4900/6 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/15 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/16 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/17 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/18 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/19 15,112 1,764 2,909 10,439 126.490% 13,204 56 1,315 11,833
12/31/20 15,112 15,112 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/21 15,112 15,112 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/22 15,112 15,112 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
$262,589 $1,070 $26,156 $235,363 $128,866
(a)Assume 0 percent annual growth in Total Net Tax Capacity.
(b)Fiscal disparities applicable.
(c)Frozen Tax Rate of N/A applies to this district.
(d)State Auditor Deduction projected to increase from 0.251%in Pay 2001 to 0.425%in Pay 2002 and after.
Prepared by:Springsted Incorporated(printed on 10/15/01 at 1:00 PM) TIF District(Apache Plaza 2#1 H).xls Taxlnc
28
Projected Tax Increment Report
• St.Anthony Village
Chandler Housing q 58
Scenario A
Less: Less: Retained Times: Less: Less: Cummulative
Annual Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Admin. Annual Total Balance
Period Net Tax Net Tax Disp.0 Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Retainage Net' - TIF TIF
Ending Capacity(a) Capacity 0.0000% (b) Capacity Rate(c) Increment 0.25%/0.425% (d) 5.00% Revenue Budget Revenue(e)
1 2 3 a 5 6 8 9 10 11 12
1,108,212
12/31/01 209,560 24,239 0 185,321 140.708% 260,781 652 13.005 247,104 105,316
12/31/02 157,171 18,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 271,625
12/31/03 157,171 18,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 437,934
12131/04 157,171 18,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 - 166,309 604,243
12/31/05 157,171 18,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 770,552
12/31/06 157,171 18,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 936,861
12/31/07 157,171 18.180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 1,103,170
12/31/08 157,171 16,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 1,269,479
12131109 157,171 18,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 1,435,788
12/31110 157,171 18.180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 1,602,097
12/31/11 157,171 18,180 0 138,991 126.490% 175,809 747 8,753 166,309 1,900,000 (131,594)
12131112 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/13 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31114 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/15 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/16 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/17 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12131/18 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/19 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/20 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12(31/21 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 0 0
12/31/22 157,171 157,171 0 0 126.490% 0 0 Of 0
$2,018,651 $8,122 $100,535 $1910,194
(a)Assume 0 percent annual growth in Total Net Tax Capacity.
(b)Fiscal disparities not applicable. -
(c)Frozen Tax Rate of WA applies to this district.
(d)State Auditor Deduction projected to Increase from 0.25%in Pay 2001 to 0.425%In Pay 2002 and after.
(e)In 2001:S250K streetscape29th,$200K lot by Amoco,$BOOK Custom Liquidators.
•
Prepared by:Springsted Incorporated(primed on 1023/01 at 2:38 PM) TIF District(Chandler fl 58).x19 Taxlnc
29
• Nystrom Enterprises, Inc. Realty
Office 612-987-3144 Fax 651-697-0684
Ray Kahl, CRS-GRI
Commercial, Industrial, Residential Sales, Since 1969
Tuesday,October 23,2001
Attention Mr. Mike Morrison
St.Anthony City Manager
St Anthony Village,MN.55418
Subject 4004 Silver Lake Road,Formerly Hardees Restaurant
Dear Mr. Mornson:
On behalf of the owner of the above mentioned property,Mr.Jim Rader,I have been meeting the
property since September 1, 1999, In all of that time 1 have had many buyers call and want to
purchase the property. In every case the buyers have been turned away because the bushwss was not
in keeping with what the City wants.
• It is now time for the City to buy the property,and do with it as they want
The seller has been paying Taxes,Insurance,and Contract payments all of this time and we have been
hauling trash dumped on the property,maintaining the grass etc.and putting up with the construction
companies parking their very heavy equipment on the parking lot
The asking price has been reduced to $319,000.00 Please respond soon, it is time to do the right
thing.
,sincerely, - Nystrom Enterprises, Inc.
Ray Kahl,CRS.GRI
I7 Residential-Commercial .,
Industrial ' ..
Full Time Since 1969
Ray Kahl,CRS-GRI 612-987-3144 n
RGK/grw 2040 Tio a Blvd. •New Brighton, MN 55112
E6# Y56 - 3 Hm:(651)633-0082 Fax:(651)697-0684
Enct4rs (4) E-NIal rayk-ahl, pclW1Lcom
a—�
• E-Mail raykahl @pclink.com
3®
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
• RESOLUTION 01-084
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on September 25, 2001,the
engineering firm of WSB & Associates, Inc. has prepared plans and
specifications for the improvement of Wilson Street, from 30th Avenue NE to
32nd Avenue NE; Harding Street, from 30`x'Avenue NE to 31"Avenue NE;
31s`Avenue NE, from Wilson Street to Silver Lake Road; and intersection
work at Edward Street, Belden Drive, and 32"d Avenue by reconstruction of
the roadways and utilities.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
that:
1) Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the
feasibility report.
2) Such plans and specifications are hereby approved.
3) The consulting engineering firm shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
paper and in the Construction Bulletin, ad advertisement for bids upon the making of
such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for two times, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids will be opened at 10:00 AM on December 20`h, and the bidders will be
considered by the City Council at 7:00 P.M. on January 22"d, 2002 in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during
consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the
.issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the
Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check
payable to the City of St. Anthony for Five (5%)percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted this day of ,2001.
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
31
• Resolution# 01-085
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LIMITED SEVER BACK-UP
CLEAN UP AND PROPERTY DAMAGE PROTECTION
FOR MUNICIPAL SEWER CUSTOMERS.
RECITALS
WHEREAS,the city affords municipal sanitary sewer services to many of the
property owners within the city; and
WHEREAS, on occasion blockages or other conditions in city sanitary sewer
lines may result in the back-up of sewage into properties that are connected to those city
sanitary lines; and
WHEREAS, sewer back-ups into'property pose a public health and safety
concern; and .
WHEREAS,it is.not always easy to discern the exact cause and responsibility for
municipal sanitary sewer back-ups, and
WHEREAS,the City Council desires to encourage the expeditious clean-up of
properties that have encountered sewer back-ups; and
• WHEREAS,the City Council desires to minimize the potential of expensive
lawsuits arising out of sewer back-up claims, and
WHEREAS,the City is a member of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust; and
WHEREAS,the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust is malting available
to the city a limited"no fault"sewer coverage that will reimburse property owners for
certain clean-up costs and property damage irrespective of whether the City is thought to
be legally at fault.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the Ci ty of
St. Anthony ,Minnesota, as follows:
As part of the contract for the provision of sewer services to the customers of the City;
and in consideration of the payment of sewer bills,the City agrees to reimburse its
sanitary sewer customers for up.to $10,000 of clean-up costs and property damages
caused by a sanitary sewer back-up, irrespective of whether the city is thought to be
negligent or otherwise legally liable for those damages, subject to the following
conditions:
32
• a. The back-up must have resulted froma condition in the'
eity's
sanitary sewer system or lines;and not from a condition is a`
private line.
b. The back-up must not have been caused by catastrophic weather or
other event for which Federal Emergency Management Assistance
is available
C. The back-up must not have been caused by an interruption in
electric power to the city's sewer system or to any city lift station,
which continues for more than 72 hours.
d. The back-up must not have been caused by rainfall or precipitation
that would constitute a 100-year storm as determined by the
National Weather Service.
e. Neither the city nor the League Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
(LMCIT)will reimburse any costs which have been or are eligible
fa be covered under the property owner's own homeowners or
other property insurance, or which would be eligible to be
reimbursed under a National Flood Insurance Protection(NFIP)
policy, whether or not the property owner actually has NFIP
coverage.
• f. The maximum amount that the City or LMCIT will reimburse is
$10,000 per building per,per year. In this regard, a structure or
group of structures served by a single connection to the city's
sewer system is considered a single building.
Adopted this day of , 2001.
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
City Clerk
• Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
33
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. OF MINNESOTA, INC.
October 18, 2001
Mr. Roger Larson
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
RE: LMCIT Policy No. CMC21585—No-fault Sewer Backup Coverage Option
Dear Roger:
The LMCIT quote and model resolution is attached. The premium quoted is 8.5% of the
Municipal Liability premium. This year, the Municipal Liability premium is $40,923.00.
The estimated annual no-fault sewer backup endorsement premium is $3,478.00, which
would be pro-rated for the remainder of this policy year.
An explanation of optional "no-fault" sewer backup coverage can be found in the
enclosed LMC bulletin of November 28,2000. Brief highlights of this coverage are:
1) Coverage is $10,000 per building per year. All buildings served by a single
connection are considered to be a single building. Covers clean-up costs and property
damage caused by sanitary sewer backup, subject to conditions:
a) the condition must be in the City's sanitary system, not a private line,
b) FEMA assistance available, then no coverage,
c) electric power interruption, 72 hours coverage limit,
d) National Weather Service designated 100-year storm exclusion,
e) National Flood Ins. Protection (NFIP) insurance coverage or el ibility, or
property owner's own insurance with flood coverage, no "no-fault sewer"
coverage.
2) The City's LMCIT policy deductible would be applicable:
$10,000 each occurrence (ie: single condition in sewer system),
$50,000 annual aggregate
.$1,000 thereafter per loss, per line of coverage.
3) Non-sanitary sewer water claims (ground water) not covered under"no-fault sewer".
4) Historial sewer backup claims experience (see LMC letter of August 3, 2001):
a) 9/2/00-Only three homes had claims in which the LMCIT offered a settlement,
but all 13 of the claimants involved would have been entitled to the"No Fault
Sewer Back Up Coverage",
b) 12/4/00-a claimant settlement was paid to a claimant, and he would have been
entitled to "No Fault Sewer Backup Coverage",
Fax
•
34
• c) 4/22/01-Eight of the ten claimants would have been entitled to the"No Fault
Sewer Back Up Coverage", and the other two claimants would not be entitled to
"No Fault Sewer Backup Coverage" because their claims involved "ground
water".
5) Any ``No Fault Sewer Backup Coverage" claims losses and expenses will be figured
into the City's Municipal Liability experience rating formula for 3 policy years
following the policy year just completed.
Please review the enclosed information. I am available if there are any other items that
need to be addressed.
Sincerely,
Carl A. Bennetsen
® ➢ Coverage became available to the City of St. Anthony on
6/1/01.
League has approved City's application.
➢ Annual Cost = $3,478.00
➢ Funds are available from Water/Sewer insurance budget.
➢ Todd Hubner from WSB, will give,his comments.
35
145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, ININ 55103-204-1
Phone: (651) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122
L TDD (651) 281-1290
eeague'of Minnesota Cities DIC Far: (651) 281=1299 • L\ICIT Fax: (651) 281-1298
Cities promoting excanance
Web Site: http://VAVW.Imnc.org
November 28, 2000
To: Member cities and agents
From: LMCIT Board of Trustees
Re: Optional "no-fault" sewer back-up coverage
LMCIT now offers member cities "no-fault" sewer back-up coverage. This new optional
coverage will reimburse a property owner for up to $10,000 of clean-up costs and
damages caused by a sewer back-up, irrespective of whether the city was negligent or
legally liable for those damages.
This new coverage option is intended to do several things:
• To reduce health hazards by encouraging pro ert owners to get back-ups cleaned up
as quickly as possible.
• To reduce the frequency and severity of sewer back-up lawsuits. I.e., property,
owners may be less inclined to sue if they receive conciliatory treatment at the time of
the back-up.
• To give cities a way to address the sticky political problems that can arise when a
property owner learns that the city and LMCIT-won't reimburse him for his sewer
back-up damages because the city wasn't negligent and is therefor not legally liable.
Many cities and their citizens may find this new coverage option to be a helpful tool.
However, it's also important to realize that it's not a complete solution to sewer back-up
problems, and that not every possible back-up will be covered.
What sewer back-ups would be covered by the new coverage?
The no-fault coverage would reimburse the property owner for sewer back-up damages,
regardless of whether the city was legally liable, if the following conditions are met:
The back-up must have resulted from a condition in the city's sewer system or lines.
• A back-up caused by a clog or other problem in the propert y owner's own line would
not be covered.
36
• • It's not one of the situations that's specifically excluded in the coverage.
The coverage limit has not been exceeded.
Which situations are excluded?
The no-fault coverage will not apply in several "catastrophic"type situations.
Specifically, these are:
• Any weather-related or other event for which FEMA assistance is available;
• Any interruption in the electric power supply to the city's sewer system or to any city
sewer lift station which continues for more than 72 hours; or
• Rainfall or precipitation that exceeds the amount determined by the National Weather
Service to constitute a I00-year storm.event.
What costs would be covered?
The no-fault sewer back-up coverage would reimburse the property owner for the cost of
cleaning up the back-up, and for any damage to the property, up to the coverage limit.
For purposes of the city's deductibles, claims under the no-fault coverage are treated as
liability claims, so the same per-occurrence and/or annual deductibles will apply.
However, there are certain costs that would not be reimbursed under the no-fault
coverage:
• Any costs which have been or are eligible to be covered under the property owner's
own homeowner's or other property insurance; and
• Any costs that would be eligible to be reimbursed under an NFIP flood insurance
policy, whether or not the property owner actually has NFIP coverage.
What is the coverage limit?
The limit is $10,000 per building per year. For purposes of the limit, a structure or group
of structures that is served by a single connection to the city's sewer system will be
considered a single building.
What will it cost?
The premium charge for the optional no-fault sewer back-up coverage will be 8.5% of the
city's municipal liability premium. The LMCIT Board's intent is that this coverage
• option be self-supporting, so we'll be monitoring and if necessary adjusting these charges
in the future.
37
Is every city automatically eliuible.
No. The city will need to meet these underwriting criteria:
• The city must have a policy and practice of inspecting and cleaning its sewer lines on
a reasonable schedule.
• If there are any existing problems in the city's system which have caused back-ups in
the past or are likely to cause back-ups, the city must have and be implementing a
plan to address those problems.
• The city must have a system and the ability to respond promptly to back-ups or other
sewer problems at any time of the day or week..
• The city must have in place an appropriate program to minimize storm- water inflow
and infiltration.
• The city must have in place a system to maintain records of routine sewer cleaning
and maintenance, and of any reported problems and responses.
We'd stress that in making the underwriting evaluation we're trying to focus on
�. reasonableness, rather than on creating very specific standards. That is, the intent isn't to
set an arbitrary requirement that sewers be inspected and cleaned every six months or
every three years or whatever. What makes sense in one city with some older and
sometimes sagging clay lines probably wouldn't make sense in a city with newer plastic
lines, and vice versa. From the underwriting standpoint, the real concern is that the city
has considered its own situation and developed polices, practices, and schedules that
make sense for its own situation.
How would the no-fault coverage work if we had a sewer back-up that was caused
by city negligence, and where the city was legally liable for the resulting damages'
In that situation, if the claim fell within the scope and the limits of the no-fault coverage,
the claim would simply be paid under the no-fault coverage.
If the situation isn't one where the no-fault coverage applies, the city's LMCIT liability
coverage would respond just as it does now. That is, LMCIT would investigate and if
necessary defend the claim on the city's behalf, and would pay the resulting damages if in
fact the city is legally liable for those damages. -
The same would be true for damages that exceed the $10,000 no-fault limit, or for a
subrogation claim against the city by the homeowner's insurance company. Tile city's
existincy LMCIT liability would respond just as it does now.
•
38
• «'hat's the legal basis for this coverage? Wouldn't it.be a gift of public funds to pay
damages that the city isn't legally liable for?
First, as noted earlier,.one goal is to.help reduce health hazards by encouraging prompt
clean-ups. That's clearly a,public purpose and in the public interest.
Second, the law and facts surrounding most sewer back-up claims are rarely so clear that
the liability issue is entirely black and white.. There's virtually.always a way that a
claimant's attorney can make some type of argument for city liability. Having this
coverage in place should help eliminate the need to spend public funds on litigation costs
in many of these cases.
Finally,part of the process for putting the coverage in place is for the city council to pass
a formal resolution that makes this no-fault sewer back-up protection part of the
agreement between the city and the sewer customer. The idea is.that by paying his sewer
bill, the sewer user is purchasing not just sewer service but also the right to be reimbursed
for certain specified sewer back-up costs and damages. In other words, the basis for the
no-fault payments to the property owner would be the contract between the city and the
sewer user.
How do we put coverage in place?
• Contact your LMCIT underwriter for an application. If the city qualifies for coverage,
we'll send the city a formal quote, along with a model resolution. To put coverage in
place, the city council must formally pass that resolution, and send a copy to LMCIT.
If the city decides to add this coverage, it will also be important to make sure the citizens
know about it. LMCIT can also'provide models for a press release, newsletter article,
utility bill insert, etc.
Who can we contact with questions or comments?
Contact your LMCIT underwriter, or Pete Tritz at the League office.
We're also interested in hearing cities' reactions to this new coverage option, especially if
there are changes you'd like to see.
•
39
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 15, 2001
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: COMMUNITY CENTER UPGRADES
Per your direction, I reviewed possible funding options for the proposed Community
Center renovations. The funds necessary total $150,000 with transformations and
improvements being implemented over a one to three-year period.
To determine if a potential funding source or sources exists, I reviewed the following
prospective areas.
Community Center Fund Balance
The-original financing plan for the Community Center included establishing a building
® fund for City Hall/Community Center improvements. At that time, it was the intent of
the City that a portion of the annual lease would go towards repayment of capital (thus
establishing a building improvement fund) and a portion would reimburse the City for
operation and maintenance costs.
Based on a cost projection formula for operation and maintenance of$1.58 per square
foot (furnished by the architectural firm of Williams/O'Brien), a portion of the School
District's rent was slated to fund future building improvements/renovations.
As with any structure, the actual costs associated with building can vary depending on the
use of the facility. Since the opening of the building in February of `97, the overall use
of the building increased significantly, which ultimately escalated the costs for operation
and maintenance.
The end result of this increased use has been that the revenues derived from the School
District lease are consumed by the costs of operation and maintenance of the building.
Liquor nrofats
Profits from our Liquor Operation are a major source of funding for Capital Equipment
purchases. Over the next 5 years, capital equipment needs are estimated at $500,000 per
year. Profits from operations are projected between $200,000 -$250,000 annually, which
• equates to the profits generated from operations are not available for a project of this
nature.
4®
Water flLtration funds on hand
The contract with the Minnesota Pollution Control expired on 3/1/01. This agreement
was a 10-year contract'in which Super Funds paid for 90% of the operation and
maintenance costs and the City paid 10%.
Under the terms of the agreement, the City is now responsible for 100% of all costs
associated with the operation and maintenance of the water filtration plant.
Upon receiving the funds from the Army, St. Anthony invested the funds with the intent
of building up the funds to a level where annual interest earnings generated from the
investments would offset the cost of operation and maintenance.
Over the past ten years, the yield of these investments exceeded the estimated rate of
return. Consequently, as part of the Springsted debt analysis, it was determined that a
portion of these funds ($1,000,000) was available for use. Based on their
recommendation, these funds were designated as one of the sources of funding for the
Central Park Project and are not available.
HRA Proiects Cash Balance
The 12/31/00 fund balance for the HRA Project Fund totaled$600,226.00. Designated
project funding includes:
Apache N/W Quadrant $200,000
S/W Quadrant $ 75,000
Park Renovations $225,000
Non-Committed $100,226
$600,226
In addition to the non-committed funds, interest earnings and charges for administrative
services for 2001 are estimated at$50,000.
The combination of non-committed funds and the addition of the 2001 interest
earnings/administrative reimbursements could be a source of funding for the Community
Center renovations by the end of the year. However. 1 caution that 100% designation of
these funds depletes the fund and restricts the future use of these funds for
redevelopment.
In the past, this fund has been the source of revenue to fund potential development
projects within the City. Committing the $225,000 for the Central Park Project reduced
• the funds available for redevelopment, but did not expend all of them ($100,226 was
available for designation/use).
41
At this time, I would not feel comfortable in recommending that the City designate
$150,000 of the HRA Projects Fund to support the Community Center Project in 2002.
My recommendation that this source of funding be viewed as a three-year funding source
of$50,000 each of the years 2002, 2003 & 2004..
Conceptually, this would leave remaining funds on hand for potential payments to
developers, purchase property or fund small redevelopment projects. The down side of
three-year funding is that the inflationary nature of construction costs, could require that
additional funding be necessary if projects costs are higher over three years versus a one-
time appropriation of $150,000.
Apache PlazalReserves for LGA losses.
In 1996, the City of St. Anthony entered into an agreement with the Ste. Marie Company
for the clearance and redevelopment of a portion of Apache Plaza. The intent of the
agreement was to provide aid and assistance to the developer(SuperValu, Inc.) through
tax increment financing.
As part of the agreement, the HRA agreed to pay Ste. Marie $1,800,000 from proceeds of
a bond sale. The property taxes from redevelopment (Cub Foods) provide the tax
® increment that pays for the annual bond payments through year 2013.
In addition, Ste. Marie agreed that upon payment, it would immediately make a
contribution to the City in the amount of$300,000. These funds were to offset any losses
or potential losses in Local Government Aid (LGA).
Last year was the first year the City incurred a loss in its LGA because of the Apache
Plaza TIF District. The loss totaled $4,207 and was transferred to the General Fund.
In 2001, the loss is $1,953, leaving a balance in the account of$293,840.
The recent Legislative changes made to the property tax system negate any future losses
in LGA. Under the terms of the agreement (Page 6, Section 3.3), the City can apply this
payment in any manner it determines.
If Council wishes, a portion of these funds could support the $150,000 necessary to fund
the improvements and renovations to the Community Center.
Prior to approval, I feel it important the City obtain written reassurance from Jerry
Gilligan that the funds are available to spend "as the City chooses." In addition,
Springsted should finalize its tax increment review, to determine if shortfalls exist in our
Tax Increment Districts caused by the Legislative changes.
•
42
Recommendation:
Conceptually, either plan could support the project. However, Council should review the
two funding sources as identified:
1) Designate funding from the HRA Projects Fund,of$50,000 for each of the years
2002, 2003 & 2004.
2) Redirect the funds designated for LGA losses associated with the redevelopment
of Apache Plaza, totaling$150,000.
Special Considerations:
As we are all aware, the City is in the middle of several improvement projects that
require significant resources. Some.of them include: the 100-Year Flood Protection
Project; Harding Street Holding Pond Project; 2000, 2001 and 2002 Road Improvement
Projects, purchase of Custom Liquidators and the $2.3 million Central Park Project.
In addition, for the next two years the State Legislature has imposed levy limits, which
will require prudent management of all operating and capital equipment expenditures.
My concern with designating these funds for use is with the restraints or restrictions that
potentially could be placed on future redevelopment projects within the City.
• To-ease any burden of potential revenue shortfalls created by the Legislative changes, it
is practical to maintain as much funds on hand as possible versus reducing reserves
under our current economic conditions. In addition, the State might implement further
cuts to City governments creating additional burdens on available resources.
Since we don't have a complete picture of what all the Legislative changes mean,
logically it seems prudent that we have a"wait and seethold approach" for at least three
to six months before approving either funding concept.
This would allow the City Council/Staff time to review the financial condition of our TIF
Districts and have a clearer picture if the funds are available to use for renovating the
Community Center or if the resources being considered are best used for redevelopment
within the City.
If Springsted's analysis reveals that we have a shortfall in our Districts or TIF budget, the
funding options discussed could become a funding source for shortfalls or potentially
used in the redevelopment of Apache Plaza.
If it becomes clear that funds are best used in some other fashion, another option would
be to include the Community Center improvements as part of a referendum for a new
Public Works facility or Fire Station. An additional option would be to include the cost
of improvements as part of a financing concept for capital equipment certificates in 2003.
•
43
DORS EY & WHITNEY L L P
MINNEAPOLIS SUITE 1500 COSTA MESA
NEW YORK 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET BILLINGS
SEATTLE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-1498 FARGO
DENVER. - HONG KONG
TELEPHONE: (612) 340-2000
WASHINGTON,D.C. GREAT FALLS
FAX: (6 12) 340-2868 _
NORTHERN VIRGINIA ROCHESTER
DES MOINES www.dorseylawxom TOKYO
LONDON JEROME P. GILLIGAN MISSOULA
ANCHORAGE (612)340-2962 VANCOUVER
SALT LAKE CITY FAX(612) 340-2643 - TORONTO
BRUSSELS gUligan.Jerome @dorseylaw.Oom SHANGHAI
October 23, 2001
Mr. Roger Larson
Finance Director
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road N.E.
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1603
Re: Contribution by Ste. Marie Company to City
• Dear Roger:
The City, the St. Anthony HRA and Ste. Marie Company, the owner of Apache Plaza
Shopping Center, entered into an Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1996, pursuant to which the
HRA agreed to provide $1,800,000 in tax increment assistance to pay a portion of the purchase
price of the CUB store site in connection with the sale of such site to SUPERVALU INC. by
Ste. Marie Company. Upon payment of such assistance by the HRA, Ste. Marie Company made
a contribution to the City in the amount of$300,000. This contribution was required by Section
3.3 of the Agreement which reads as follows:
"Section 3.3 Contribution to City. The Company agrees that upon
payment to it of the amount provided in Section 3.1 it will immediately
make a contribution to the City in the amount of$300,000. The Company
agrees that such contribution may be applied by the City in any manner as
it shall determine."
The purpose of the contribution by Ste. Marie Company was to reimburse the City for the
estimated reduction in Local Government Aid ("LGA") to be received in future years by the City
as a result of the existence of the Apache Plaza TIF district. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section
273.1399, tax increment generated by the Apache Plaza TIF District resulted in a reduction in
LGA to the City based upon the formula set forth in this section(the"LGA Penalty"). It is my
understanding that the City has accounted for this contribution separately on its books and has
• applied money from the contribution to reimburse it for its annual LGA Penalty as a result of the
Apache Plaza TIF District. Now that this LGA Penalty has been eliminated as part of the change
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 44
_ r
Mr. Roger Larson
October 23, 2001
Page 2-
in school funding and property tax reform enacted by the Legislature this year, you have asked
whether there are any restrictions under the Agreement as to expenditure by the City of such
funds.
Section 3.3 clearly states that the contribution required to be made by Ste. Marie
Company may be applied by the City in any manner as it shall determine. The provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1766, which provides that developer payments, such as the
contribution by Ste. Marie Company, must be treated as tax increment revenue and may only be
spent for the purposes for which tax increments may be spent, is not applicable to the
contribution because this section is not applicable to the Apache TIF District. Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.1766 was enacted by the Legislature in 1993 and is effective for TIF
districts for which request for certifications of the district were made after August 1, 1993. The
request for certification of the Apache TIF District was made to Ramsey County on April 21,
1993.
In connection with the TIF assistance provided to Ste. Marie Company the amount of the
contribution was specifically negotiated to cover the estimated present value of the LGA Penalty
loss to the City, and as part of the negotiations the amount of TIF assistance provided to Ste.
Marie Company was increased to cover such contribution. In reality what occurred was tax
increment money was used to make the contribution to the City and was to be applied to
reimburse the City for the LGA Penalty.
Given the clear and unambiguous language of Section 3.3 of the Agreement that the
contribution may be applied by the City in any manner it shall determine, together with the
circumstances surrounding such contribution, I do not believe that Ste. Marie Company has any
basis to claim.that with the elimination of LGA Penalty the City must retu.--q the contribution to
Ste. Marie Company or otherwise apply it in a manner which it specifies. In addition, under the
provisions of the TIF Act it is clear that such contribution does not constitute tax increment
revenue under the TIF Act. Consequently; I do not believe there are any restrictions imposed by
the Agreement or TIF Act on the manner in which the contribution may be expended by the City.
It should be kept in mind by the City that while LGA Penalty has now been eliminated it
is theoretically possible that if in the future the Legislature were to change school funding back
to the prior system, the LGA Penalty could be reinstated in the future similar to what has
occurred from time to time with levy limits. At this time I am unaware of any discussions or
proposals to reinstate LGA Penalty. However, if school funding were to change in the future and
the LGA Penalty is reinstated during the term of the Apache Plaza TIF District, it is possible that
• the existence of such TIF District could result in a reduction in LGA received by the City.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 45
Mr. Roger Larson
October 23, 2001
Page 3
Should you have any questions, please call me.
Yours Tryly,
er me P. Gill' n
1G/31/01 WED 11:05 FA% 6123402643
46
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting Mayor and Members of the City Council
Michael Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan
DATE: October 30, 2001
RE: Mayoral Vacancy
Vacancies in elective offices are governed by Minn. Stat. §412.02, subd. 2a. The statute
provides that a vacancy in an office"shall be filled by council appointment." Although the
statute does not mandate when the appointment must be made, any vacancy in an elective office
should be filled by the City Council as soon as practicable. The law does not require the City to
advertise a vacancy in office although the City Council could choose to do so. The law also does
not require the City to interview prospective council members or to follow any set procedures.
These matters are within the discretion of the Council.
The Council may appoint any individual who is otherwise eligible for election. Under
state law, this means the person selected must be at least 21 years of age, a citizen of the United
States, a resident of the state for at least 20 days, and a resident of the City of St. Anthony. The
Council may appoint a current Council Member or any other eligible resident of the City. If the
Council is voting to appoint as mayor a current member of the Council,the interested Council
Member should not participate in the vote. See Minn. Stat. § 471.46 (A council member may be
appointed to the office of mayor but"the member shall not vote in the appointment.')
In the present case,the mayor's resignation has.created a vacancy. The appointment of a
new mayor must be made by the City Council. The appointment is to be made by a majority
vote of the remaining Council Members at a regular or special meeting of the Council. If there is
a tie vote,the statute prpvides that"the mayor shall make the appointment." Since the mayor's
office is vacant,the acting mayor shall make the appointment if there is a tie vote. See Minn.
Stat. § 412.121 ("The acting mayor shall perform the duties of mayor...in case of vacancy in the
office of mayor,until a successor has been appointed and qualifies.") The acting mayor may
select any qualified person and does not need to choose from those individuals considered by the
Council. The acting mayor,however,may not appoint himself or herself as the mayor.
Since the vacancy occurred after the fast day to file affidavits of candidacy for the City's
regular 2001 election, the person appointed to the mayor's office shall serve the remainder of the
term or, if the Council elects to hold a special election to fill the unexpired term,until the
qualification for office of the person elected as mayor at the special election.
If a current Council Member is appointed as mayor and accepts such appointment, such
Council Member gives up his or her position as a Council Member and there will be a vacancy in
• that Council position. The Council cannot appoint a Council Member to "temporarily"serve as
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
1C/31/01 WED 11:06 FAX 6123402643 �y
4/
• Mayor until a special election is held to elect a person to complete the unexpired mayoral term,
with such person returning to his or her position as a Council Member after the mayoral election.
The vacancy in the Council position must be filled using the same procedure for filling the
mayoral vacancy. The Council votes to makes the appointment,and in the event of a tie vote by
the Council, the mayor makes the appointment. The Council has the option after the
appointment is made to hold a special election prior to the next regular election to fill the
unexpired term. If the Council determines to hold a special election, then the person appointed
to fill the vacancy serves until the person elected to the Council position at the special election is
qualified for office.
If a Council Member who is up for reelection is reelected and then appointed Mayor prior
to commencement of his new term as Council Member in January 2002,then such person is no
longer qualified to accept the position as council member upon commencement of such new
term. In such case there is a vacancy in such council position which must be filled using the
same procedure for filling the mayoral vacancy. Since more than two years will remain in the
unexpired term,the appointed Council Member serves until a special election is held at the
City's next regular city election in November 2003 unless the Council determines to hold the
special election on an earlier date. The next highest vote getter at the November 61'election does
not become elected to such position. If a person had been appointed by the Council prior to the
end of 2001 to complete such Council Member's then expiring term, such person has not been
appointed for the term of office commencing in January 2002 and a new appointment is
necessary once the Council seat becomes vacant again in January 2002. Such new appointment
can not be made until the vacancy occurs upon the commencement of the new term in January
2002.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS
v
November 6, 2001
lII FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues
November 27 Regular Union contracts
City Manager's resolution
JH& DE Review Emergency Operations Plan
Planning Commission items 1. antenna ord. (151
reading); Village Blend; Curves for Women,Village
North
December 11 Regular Dept. Heads Public hearing on 2002 budget
(last meeting of
2001)
Res.,City Hall cleaning proposal
Park&Planning Commissioners
interviews(?)/appointments
January 8(first
meeting of
2002)
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 6, 2001
TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: 2002 PROPERTY TAX CALCULATION
On June 30`h, the Governor signed into law major property tax reform. Early estimates
projected by the State indicated that property taxes would decrease by approximately
20%.
As part of the sweeping changes, HACA was eliminated to all Cities forcing them to levy
back for their loss in revenue ($349,289 for St. Anthony). Fundamentally the changes
made to the tax system, such as the elimination of HACA and new class rates, makes it
almost impossible to compare last year's levy and tax rate to this years.
As part of the restructuring process, the State expected Cities to levy back for their
HACA loss; also knowing the changes would significantly increase City tax rates.
However, we must not lose focus that restructuring of the property tax system overall
means that taxpayers will see a 20% decrease in their property taxes.
Listed below is a summary of the estimated property taxes St. Anthony taxpayers will
experience in 2002:
Hennepin County:
✓ Average valuation $163,000
✓ 2001 property taxes $2,441.34
✓ 2002 property taxes $2,114.63
✓ Property tax relief ($ 326.71)
✓ Percentage decrease 15.5%
Ramsey County:
✓ Average valuation $167,900
✓ 2001 property taxes $2,670.69
✓ 2002 property taxes $2,178.20
✓ Property tax relief ($ 492.49)
✓ Percentage decrease 22.6%
4b 4
SEPTEMBER 2001 City of St. Anthony
Profit& Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV 1 SAV II STONEHOUSE 09/30/01 09/30/00 (Decrease)
Sales $158,529.00 $157,466.00 $56,347.00 $3,538,589.00 $3,427,826.00 $110,763.00
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $123,690.00 $123,396.00 $16,675.00 $2,533,572.00 $2,467,730.00 $65,842.00
Gross Profit $34,839.00 $34,070.00 $39,672.00 $1,005,017.00 $960,096.00 $44,921.00
Ratio to Net Sales 21.98% 21.64% 70.41% 28.40% 28.01%
Operating Expense:
Salaries,Wages, Benefits $12,940.00 $12,396.00 $20,424.00 $466,755.00 $430,065.00 $36,690.00
All Other Expenses $10,316.00 $11,731.00 $16,210.00 $386,384.00 $409,859.00 ($23,475.00)
Total Operating Expense $23,256.00 $24,127.00 $36,634.00 $853,139.00 $839,924.00 $13,215.00
Ratio to Net Sales 14.67% 15.32% 65.01% 24.11% 24.50%
Profit from Operations $11,583.00 $9,943.00 $3,038.00 $151,878.00 $120,172.00 $31,706.00
Other Income $1,003.00 $451.00 $1,379.00 $39,496.00 $38,000.00 $1,496.00
Net Income $12,586.00 $10,394.00 $4,417.00 $191,374.00 $158,172.00 $33;202.00
Ratio to Net Sales 7.94% 6.60% 7.84% 5.41% 4.61%
September-Net Income $27,397.00
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 09/30/01 $75,325.00 $74,772.00 $41,277.00 $191,374.00
YEAR TO DATE 09/30/00 $67,745.00 $68,260.00 $22,167.00 $158,172.00 (Audited)
INCREASEIDECREASE $7,580.00 $6,512.00 $19,110.00 $33,202.00
4 4b
September 2001 City of St. Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I SAV II
Beginning Inventory: $249,521.90 Beginning Inventory. $257,881.30
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers $2,079.73 Transfers ($2,079.73)
Adjustments ($138.04) Adjustments $287.15
Returns to Vendors ($7,049.74) Returns to Vendors ($1,948.13)
Add: Receiving $97,220.48 Add: Receiving $104,334.73
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($123,551.48) Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($123,683:02)
TOTAL $218,082.85 TOTAL $234,792.30
Total per Valuation Report $217,859.72 "' Total per Valuation Report $235,026.40
Difference ($223.13) Difference $234.10.
Beginning October 2001 Inventory $217,859.72 Beginning October 2001 Inventory $235,026.40
"`Comes from Valuation Report ""Comes from Valuation Report
4b
2000 Actual Profits (Audited) 2001 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Stonehouse Profits . Comparison
January $2,469.00 $2,043.00 $4,496.00 $9,008.00 January $4,972.00 $5,329.00 ($1,851.00) $8,450.00 ($558.00)
February $411.00 $4,119.00 ($4,306.00) $9,232.00 February $7,218.00 $6,065.00 $9,410.00 $31,143.00 $21,911.00
March $7,815.00 $9,720.00 $9,039.00 $35,806.00 March $9,510.00 $7,064.00 $7,510.00 $55,227.00 $19,421.00
April $13,057.00 $10,593.00 $6,060.00 $65,516.00 April $5,631.00 $4,295.00 $10,712.00 $75,865.00 $10,349.00
May $9,857.00 $11,127.00 ($600.00) $85,900.00 May $5,705.00 $6,957.00 $1,372.00 $89,899.00 $3,999.00
June $12,282.00 $11,484.00 $141.00 $109,807.00 June $16,325.00 $14,485.00 $2,734.00 $123,443.00 $13,636.00
July $8,419.00 $8,395.00 ($259.00) $126,362.00 July $9,392.00 $12,077.00 $3,712.00 $148,624.00 $22,262.00
August $802.00 $4,610.00 $5,301.00 $137,075.00 August $3,986.00 $8,106.00 $3,261.00 $163,977.00 $26,902.00
September $12,633.00 $6,169.00 $2,295.00 $158,172.00 September $12,586.00 $10,394.00 $4,417.00 $191,374.00 $33,202.00
October $5,686.00 $3,068.00 ($898.00) $166,028.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $191,374.00 $0.00
November $7,169.00 $10,392.00 $6,272.00 $189,861.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $191,374.00 $0.00
December $9,592.0 0 14 327.0 $4,042.00 $217,822.00 December $0.00 .00 $0.00 $191,374.00 $0.00
Total $90,192.00 $96,047.00 $31,583.00 $217,822.00 Total $75,325.00 $74,772.00 $41,277.00 $191,374.00
Increase/(Decrease) $7,580.00 $6,512.00 $19,110.00 $33,202.00
Y-T-D By Store
4b
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: October 2001
Expenditures: Mean Average
83%
10/31/2001 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Spent Budget
Mayor/Council $53,000.00 $50,570.84 $2,429.16 95% 5%
Intergovernmental Relations $19,500.00 $14,850.00 $4,650.00 76% 24%
Cable Franshise $18,000.00 $15,097.80 $2,902.20 84% 16%
General Management $93,000.00 $90,808.07 $2,191.93 98% 2%
Elections $16,400.00 $11,399.01 $5,000.99 70% 30%
Finance/Insurance $212,400.00 $169,992.95 $42,407.05 80% 20%
Finance/Assessing $36,500.00 $36,496.39 $3.61 100% 0%
Legal $58,400.00 $54,269.99 $4,130.01 93% 7%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,700.00 $416.66 $2,283.34 15% 85%
City Buildings $104,600.00 $68,803.43 $35,796.57 66% 34%
Civil Defense $40,400.00 $32,473.97 $7,926.03 800/6 20%
Police Protection $983,600.00 $825,345.07 $158,254.93 84% 16%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $491,200.00 $412,053.83 $79,146.17 84% 16%
Fire Protection $527,975.00 $416,093.43 $111,881.57 79% 21%
Inspections/Building Permits $69,800.00 $60,998.23 $8,801.77 87% 13%
Animal Control $3,400.00 $2,067.66 $1,332.34 61% 39%
Public Works $367,800.00 $301,718.64 $66,081.36 82% 18%
Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $103,700.00 $87,235.27 $16,464.73 84% 16%
Tree and Weed Care $25,400.00 $15,453.34 $9,946.66 61% 39%
Parks $105,100.00 $94,380.59 $10,719.41 90% 10%
Transfers to other Funds $75,000.00 $56,250.00 $18,750.00 75% 25%
Budget Reserves $112,000.00 0.00 $112,000.00 0% 100%
Total Expenditures $3,519,875.00 $2,816,775.17 $703,099.83 80% 20%
To: Michael Mornson, City Manager
From: Michael L. Larson, Liquor Operations Manager
Subject: October Informational Report
Date: 10/10/2001
October Sales Summary Monthly Sales Increase/(Decrease)
Stonehouse Bar & Grill $62,937.00 ($70.00)
Off-Sale Store $167,054.00 $8,100.00
Off-Sale Store #2 $170,979.00 $18,268.00
Category Summary
Liquor $105,493.00 $9,425.00
Beer $147,261.00 $12,600.00
Wine $69,676.00 $9,030.00
Mix/Misc. $6,478.00 .$20.00
Tobacco $9,450.00 ($550.00)
***The increase/decrease column represents figures compared to the year 2000.
Fun facts regarding the sales difference of product types between the two Off-
Sale stores. During the month of October;
• Store #2 sold $9,570 more Liquor than Store #1.
• Store #1 sold $11,490 more Beer than Store #2.
• Store #2 sold $9,030 more Wine than Store #1.
• Store #1 sold $214 more Mix/Misc. than Store#2
• Store #1 sold $3,500 more Tobacco than Store #2.
We held the first in a series of three holidn wine tastings at Store#2 on October
18th. The next tasting will be November 15 from 4-7pm. I also arranged for a
private "in-home" wine tasting party for a customer of ours. A winery
representative tasted an assortment of wines during a dinner party at our
customer's house. The event was of no cost to the customer or our operation.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
November 13, 2001
PAGE(S)
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 13, 2001 H.R.A. AGENDA.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these
items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which
event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve October 23, 2001 H.R.A. Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
B. Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
VI. STAFF REPORTS.
VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
•
IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
A. H.R.A. Minutes - October 23, 2001
B. Claims
1
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
3 OCTOBER 23, 2001
4 I. CALL TO ORDER.
5 Chair Cavanaugh called the meeting to order at 8:08 P.M.
6 II. ROLL CALL. '
7 Commissioners present: Vice Chair Horst; Commissioners Sparks, Thuesen, and Hodson.
8 Commissioners absent: None.
9 Also present: Executive Director Michael Morrison and City Attorney Jerome
10 Gilligan.
11 III. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 23,2001 H.R.A. AGENDA.
12 Motion by Commissioner Sparks to approve the October 23', 2001 Housing and Redevelopment
13 Authority Agenda as presented.
14 Motion carried unanimously.
15 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
16 Motion by Commissioner Hodson to approve the Consent Agenda, which consisted of:
9 1 7 A. H.R.A. Meeting Minutes of October 9, 2001; and
8 B. Claims.
9 Motion carried unanimously.
20 V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
21 None.
22 VI. STAFF REPORTS.
23 None.
24 VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
25 None.
26 VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
27 Vice Chair Horst stated that there would need to be discussion on the structure of the H.R.A., as
28 the officers and memberships have changed due to Dennis Cavanaugh's resignation as Mayor.
29 IX. ADJOURNMENT.
30 Motion by Commissioner Hodson to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 p.m.
31 Motion carried unanimously.
#2 Respectfully submitted,
3 Courtney Seesz,
34 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Following are the verified claims for the November 13, 2001 (HRA)
1. City of St. Anthony...............................................$155,000.00
Xcel Energy/Streetscape
2. Belair Builders, Inc. ................................................$44,574.30
Demolition/Custom Liquidators
3. Veit Environmental...................................................$3,000.00
Asbestos Removal/Custom Liquidators