HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 12112001 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
102953
Box: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 12112001
H.R.A. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
December 11, 2001
(Immediately following Commission interviews)
7:00 pm
Council Chambers
PAGE(S)
I. Call to Order.
II. Pledge Of Allegiance.
Ill. Roll Call.
IV. Approval of December 11, 2001 City Council Meeting
Agenda.
V. Proclamations and Recognitions.
• VI. Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular
agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address
for the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City
Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically
refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on
an upcoming agenda.
VII. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests,
in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve.November 27, 2001 Regular Council
MeetingMinutes .................................................................................. 1 - 9
6. Licenses/Permits .................................................................................... 10
CClaims ............................................................................................. 11 - 14.
D. Resolution 01-092, re: Approve 2002 Ramsey County
Grant Application and Program ............................................................. 15
E. Resolution 01-093, re: Approve Cleaning Service Contract
•
for City Hall/Community Center Building ......................................... 16 - 17-
• City of St. Anthony Regular Council Meeting
December 11, 2001
Page 2
PAGE(S)
F. Ordinance 2001-004, re: Wireless Telecommunication
Towers and Facilities 2 reading) 18 - 30
G. Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners from those
persons interviewed earlier this evening.
VIII. Hennepin.County Attorney Amy Klobuchar will
attend the meeting to give a presentation and
answer questions.
IX. Public Hearings.
A. Resolution 01-094, re: Proposed 2002 City
Budget and property taxes .............................................................. 31 - 51
X. Reports From Commissions and Staff.
• XI. General Policy Business of the Council.
XII. Reports from City Manager and Councilmembers.
XIII. Information and Announcements.
XIV. Adjournment.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.
VII. Consent Agenda.
A. Approve 11/27/01Council Minutes
B. Licenses/permits
C. Claims
D. Resolution 01-092
E. Resolution 01-093
F. Ordinance 2001-004 (2nd reading)
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
• 2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 November 27,2001
4 I. CALL TO ORDER
5 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
6 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
7 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
8 III. ROLL CALL.
9 Councilmembers present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Sparks, Thuesen, Horst
10 and Faust.
11 Councilmembers absent: None.
12 Also present: City Manager Mike Mornson; City Attorney Jerry
13 Gilligan.
14 IV. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 27,2001 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
15 AGENDA.
16 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the November 27, 2001 City Council Regular
17 Meeting Agenda.
018 Motion carried unanimously.
19 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
20 Mayor Hodson stated that Boy Scout Troop#711 and Troopleader Steve Hamiline were present
21 this evening. Mr. Hamiline indicated that they were present in order to fulfill the obligation for
22 their Citizen in Community Merit Badge.
23 Mayor Hodson thanked them for their presence.
24 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
25 Mayor Hodson invited residents in the audience to speak to the Council on items that are not on
26 the regular agenda.
27 Hearing none, Mayor Hodson moved forward with the agenda.
28 VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
29 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to approve the Consent Agenda. Said Consent Agenda
30 consisted of.
31 A. Council Study Session Meeting Minutes—November 13, 2001, and
32 B. Licenses/Permits: and
33 C. Claims; and
• 34 D. Resolution 01-086, re: Approve City Manager's Salary.
35 Motion carried 4-0. Faust abstained.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 2
November 27, 2001
Page 2
•
1 _VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
2 None.
3 IX. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF.
4 A. Planning Commission—November 20, 2001.
5 1. Resolution 01-089,re: Approve ordinance amendment request from Ken Solie for
6 2801-37`'Avenue NE.
7 Planning Commissioner Chair Melsha reviewed the details of Resolution 01-089 with the
8 Council.
9 Melsha stated that the Commission recommended denial of amending the ordinance. He
10 stated that the Commission also recommended that Mr. Solie apply for a conditional use
11 permit.
12 Councilmember.Sparks asked how about the length of the process as a conditional use
13 permit. City Attorney Jerry Gilligan stated that it would take about thirty days.
14 Councilmember Sparks asked about the conditional uses to be included in the conditional
15 use permit. Melsha indicated that quantifying conditions is their most difficult task. He
16 indicated that the Planning Commission did not discuss the conditions at their last
17 meeting. ,
18 Councilmember Sparks asked if it was possible to set a limit in terms of odor and
19 something that they can enforce as a city. Gilligan stated that it was very difficult to do.
20 He added that, as a conditional use, there would exist some grounds for them more room
21 for enforcement of the conditional use.
22 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he was in favor of a conditional use permit for the
23 space.
24 Councilmember Horst asked what was and was not included under light industrial. He
25 added that he was concerned that their own needs could over-shadow businesses from
.26 entering the city. He made reference to some of the fast-food restaurants in town that
27 emit some sort of odor.
28 Steve Levitus, President of Essenco, came forward and indicated that the fragrance is
29 very contained, and unlikely that the fragrances would escape the building to the extent
30 that they would reach residents across the street.
31 Ken Solie, owner of the property, came forward with a diagram of the discussed location.
32 He indicated that there are no service doors on 37' Street. Solie stated that the building
33 is set up with very extensive ventilation due to the past tenant, and that fragrances can
34 only escape-through the back of the building. He concluded that he does not fear that
35 there will be an issue with fragrance.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
3
November 27, 2001
Page 3
• 1 Councilmember Faust asked Levitus about the level of production that they practice at
2 his company. Levitus indicated that they are at the low-end of their mass market in terms
3 of percentage of fragrance by weight.
4 Mayor Hodson stated that he would like to see.the Planning Commission review the
5 conditional use permit route and the associated conditions. He added that Solie had
6 written a letter to the city back on November 25, 2001, and asked Mr. Solie to share the
7 contents of his letter.
8 Councilmember Sparks clarified that the only problem that they are facing at this point
9 with a conditional use permit was that it delayed Essenco's occupying the space by one
10 month. Levitus agreed, and added that the one-month delay was quite an inconvenience
11 to them.
12 Solie's letter explained the history of the process that they have undergone thus far,
13 which has been quite extensive. He expressed his disappointment with the unforeseen
14 obstacles that they have faced. He added that they fully understood taking the route of
15 conditional use permit,but added that it delayed the process another thirty days.
16 Solie indicated that they could set a certain criteria between themselves and City Staff.
17 Gilligan indicated that the problem would exist with the next candle manufacturer that
• 18 would come to town.and want to enter the same facility. He indicated that the city would
19 not have the same set of standards if they did not get a conditional use permit.
20 Mayor Hodson asked Gilligan for his recommendation. Gilligan recommended that they
21 use a conditional use permit, in order to protect them from future candle-making
22 companies from entering under the same conditions.
23 Councilmember Horst indicated that they were trying to quantify the odor issue, which is
24 not possible, and felt that they were over-discussing the issue. He added that he did not
25 want to throw all caution to the wind.
26 Councilmember Thuesen agreed with Councilmember Horst when he stated that they do
27 not examine the potential odor of other establishments, which emit odors.
28 Councilmember Horst added that he would prefer to set conditions under a conditional
29 use permit.
30 Levitus stated that there have been several different candle-making companies that have
31 gone into several suburbs of Minneapolis within the last couple of years.
32 Councilmember Thuesen wondered if it shorten the length of the process if the Council
33 denied the request for tonight and recommended going the route of a conditional use
34 permit also approving an ordinance that would allow the production of wax.
• 35 Gilligan stated that if they did the ordinance amendment tonight, as well,they would
36 save a couple of weeks, by eliminating one step in the process.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 4
November 27,2001
Page 4
• 1 The Council decided that they would like to take the route of conditional use permit,
2 while still helping to move the process along for Mr. Solie and Mr. Levitus.
3 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to amend code 1640.03 to add as a conditional
4 permitted use the manufacturing of scented wax candles.
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6 2. Resolution 01-090, re: Approve conditional use permit request from Michele Rae
7 for 2500 Highway 88.
8 Planning Commission Chair Melsha reviewed the details of Resolution 01-090 with the
9 Council, and mentioned that Michele Rae was present to answer any questions regarding
10 her request.
11 Michele Rae came forward to review Curves for Women, and the type of workout that it
12 provides women.
13 Councilmember Horst confirmed that the establishment is for women only. He also
14 confirmed that there is no plan for a locker room facility in the establishment.
15 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve Resolution 01-090,re: Approve ordinance
16 request from Michele Rae for 2500 Highway 88, under the findings of the Planning
® 17 Commission. ,
18 Motion carried unanimously.
19 3. Resolution 01-091,re: Approve conditional use permit request from Village
20 Blend for 2900 Pentagon Drive.
21 Planning Commission Chair Melsha reviewed the details of Resolution 01-091 with the
22 Council,and mentioned that Mr. and Mrs. Pavelka and Tom Brever were present to
23 answer any questions regarding their request.
24 Brever,attorney to the Pavelka's and proposed investor of the Village Blend Cafd, came
25 forward to address the Council. He stated that the issue as to whether, or not this
26 constitutes a restaurant comes up under the conditional use permit.
27 Brever reviewed the definition of restaurant under two different statutes. He stated that
28 the statutes have recently been construed under a recent court decision. He added that he
29 feels that the Village Blends Cafd does constitute a restaurant under Minnesota statute.
30 Councilmember Horst asked if they have thought about the restaurant element of the
31 proposed Cafd growing. Brever indicated that they plan to take small steps toward a
32 fuller-service kitchen.
33 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to approve Resolution 01-091, re: Approve
34 conditional use permit request from Village Blend for 2900 Pentagon Drive under the
35 findings of the Planning Commission.
5
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2001
Page 5
. . • 1 Motion carried 4-0. Hodson abstained.
2 4. Ordinance 2001-004,re: Wireless Telecommunication Towers and Facilities
3 Ordinance(I"reading).
4 Melsha indicated that the ordinance has been an issue for them for over a year. He
5 reviewed the ordinance with the Council,and provided them with additional details of the
6 process that they have undergone.
7 Melsha touched on a couple of the definitions contained in the ordinance and expounded
8 on them for the Council.
9 Melsha stated that the idea was to encourage and require that Wireless
10 Telecommunication Facilities (WTFs)be collocated.
11 Mayor Hodson commended Melsha on an outstanding job on the ordinance. He
12 indicated that they were several dead-areas in the city, and asked if there have been any
13 wireless service providers that they have had to deny their entering the city in the past.
14 Melsha indicated that he was not aware of any wireless service providers have been
15 denied entering the City of St. Anthony.
16 Councilmember Thuesen also commended Melsha and the Planning Commission. He
17 referred to the ordinance and asked about Subdivision 10, letter B in the ordinance, and
18 asked how likely is it that wireless service providers will do their best to colloca;e.
19 Melsha stated that there is certainly a spirit there, but it was certainly something with
20 which the Planning Commission struggles.
21 Councilmember Horst stated that the ordinance covers antennas that are located both on
22 city-owned properties and industrial zones, and asked if the ordinance covered private
23 properties, as well. Melsha stated that the two areas that Councilmember Horst
24 mentioned could be administratively approved, and that other areas could be used as
25 conditional use permit.
26 Motion by Councilmember Faust to approve Ordinance 2001-004, re: Wireless
27 Telecommunication Towers and Facilities Ordinance(l'reading).
28 Motion carried unanimously.
29 Mayor Hodson kindly gave the Boy Scout Troop #711 the opportunity to leave at this
30 time. The troop gladly accepted and left Council Chambers at 8:23 p.m.
31 B. City of St. Anthony Emergency Plan lan (Chief Engstrom Chief of Police and Fire Chief
32 Hewitt will be present).
33 Chief Engstrom came forward to address the Council. Chief Engstrom explained that there have
t34 been a lot of questions from the community regarding their Emergency Plan. He added that
35 many of the phone-calls that they have received were regarding in-coming mail, and safety of
36 the water supply.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2001
Page 6
• 1 Chief Hewitt stated that the Emergency Plan was a result of a City Council Resolution in 1972,
2 and is managed by the Emergency Manager(Fire Chief). -
3 CITY EMERGENCY PLAN
4 . • Plan utilizes all City Departments to manage an emergency.
5 • Emergencies include:
6 o Large complex fire incidents
7 o Wind/winter storms
8 o Natural disasters
9 o Hazardous materials releases
10 o Mass casualty incidents
11 o Radiological incidents
12 Utilizes the Public Works for:
13 o Engineering
14 o Debris removal
15 o Utilities
16 Utilizes the Fire Department for:
17 o Fire suppression
18 o Search and rescue
19 o Communications/Incident Management
® 20 o Emergency medical services
21 o Mitigate/Control hazardous materials releases ,
22 Utilizes the Police Department for:
23 o Law enforcement
24 o Traffic control
25 o Security
26 o Evacuation
27 Utilizes the City Manager for:
28 o Initiate the emergency call list
29 o Obtain reports and initiate a record keeping system
30 o Set up emergency City Administration
31 o Conduct disaster survey with Mayor
32 o Check out local needs of residentsibusiness'
33 Utilizes the Mayor for:
34 o Obtains information from the City Manager and Emergency Manager on
35 emergency conditions
36 o Conducts tours of disaster sites, as appropriate
37 o Prepares press and informational releases
38 o Makes contact with County, State Agencies and Governor
39 o Coordinates information with city PIO
40 Hewitt stated that the City of St. Anthony does not have a plan for terrorism, bio-terrorism,
1041 chemical warfare, nor weapons of mass destruction. He added that there is no handbook on what
42 to do, and that they are creating what to do, since the events of September 11, 2001, which is not
43 to say that there is no plan at all.
7
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2001
Page 7
• 1 Hewitt added that the city's Emergency Plan does have plans within it to deal with weapons of
2 mass destruction, or bio-terrorism. He indicated that the Fire Department does not have the _
3 ability to handle a terroristic attack alone, but that a response would either be regional,or
4 involve several departments, utilizing resources from surrounding departments and agencies.
5 Hewitt reviewed the areas within the state that have equipment and staff to aid the City of St.
6 Anthony in the case of an emergency.
7 Hewitt indicated that the Fire Department has daily contacts with the Hennepin Sheriff and FBI
8 providing up-to-date information and alerts. He added that he also has daily contact with other
9 Fire Chiefs, and good working relationships with other agencies.
10 Engstrom stated that the Police Department also has daily contacts with either the FBI, county,
11 or state. He added that there will be a program put on by Minnesota Management Systems the
12 morning of November 28, 2001, and that attendance should be mandatory for the Fire
13 Department and the Police Department.
14 Hewitt stated that, like everyone else, they are on constant alert, not panicking, and are aware of
15 what is going on around them. He asked that everyone else also be aware of what is going on
16 around him or her, as well, and to report anything that is suspicious. He added that it is as
17 important that we all go on with our lives.
018 Engstrom stated that no one could be prepared for what has happened, and stated that h9 has a
19 copy of the individual strategies and plans for each city. He added that he felt that they were
20 doing a pretty good job in their cooperation efforts and return to normalcy.
21 Mayor Hodson thanked Engstrom and Hewitt for their commitment to come forward and share
22 the Emergency Plan for the City of St. Anthony in case of an emergency.
23 Councilmember Sparks asked what the role was of the Chief Health Officer in the Emergency
24 Plan. Engstrom indicated that Dr. Carr was in that role, but that he was uncertain of his role.
25 Mornson indicated that he did not think that there was much of a role, if any, for the Chief
26 Health Officer to play. Mayor Hodson asked that Engstrom look into the potential role of the
27 Chief Health Officer in the Emergency Plan.
28 Mayor Hodson thanked the Engstrom and Hewitt for addressing the Council and public this
29 evening on the Emergency Plan for the City of St. Anthony.
30 X. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
31 A. Resolution 01-087, re: Approve union agreement with Police Department and Resolution
32 01-088, re: Approve union agreement with Public Works Department.
33 City Manager Mike Mornson reviewed the resolutions with the Council. He indicated that,
34 under the contracts that were agreed to, they went under mediation and came to an agreement.
• 35 Mornson stated that it was good that they came to an agreement before the end of the year. He
36 reviewed the changes for the Public Works contract, as well as the changes for the Police
37 Contract.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 8
November 27, 2001
Page 8
_ • 1 Momson stated that the Fire Fighters contract has been rejected by the Fire Fighters.
2 Mayor Hodson asked what happens come December 31, 2001 with the Fire Fighters. Momson
3 indicated that nothing changes for them until an agreement is reached. He added that there has
4 not been a conversation with them since they have rejected the offer. He stated that they meet.
5 again,but his opinion is that, as a city, it will be difficult to compromise what they have offered
6 the Fire Fighters because it has been accepted by two of the other unions. Morrison stated that
7 he shared that information with the Fire Fighters.
8 Councilmember Sparks asked Mornson what the stumbling block was with the Fire Fighters
9 contract. Mornson indicated that it was not clear to him either, but speculated. He stated that
10 one of the issues was that they are looking for 80%coverage of family health insurance.
11 Councilmember Sparks asked what the coverage was at this time. Mornson indicated that it is
12 between 68-72%.
13 Mornson continued that the Fire Department would like to negotiate the terms and conditions of
14 the housing code enforcement.
15 Morrison stated that his position is to stick with what has been agreeable for the Police and
16 Public Works Departments.
0 17 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adopt Resolution 01-087, re: Approve union agreement
18 with Police Department and Resolution 01-088, re: Approve union agreement with Public Works
19 Department.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 XI. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
22 Mornson indicated that there has been a lot of interest in the openings on the Parks and Planning
23 Commissions. He reviewed the status of the interviews, and asked the Council what path they
24 wanted to take.
25 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he was in favor of interviewing all candidates. It was
26, immediately determined that it was a unanimous decision on behalf of the Council that all
27 candidates be interviewed.
28 Mornson indicated the primary reason for the City Council Study Session Meeting of December
29 6,2001. He stated that he and Jim Prosser and John Shardlow interviewed several development
30 proposals. He indicated that a decision did not need to be made tonight, but wanted the
31 Councilmembers to give it some thought.
32 Councilmember Sparks requested any information about the developers before the meeting of
33 December 6,2001.
34 Mayor Hodson asked when they would receive the community surveys back from residents.
35 Momson indicated that they should have them back by the beginning of 2002.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 9
November 27, 2001
Page 9
• 1 Mornson stated he and Mayor Hodson would be attending a State-of-the-Region address on
2 December 12, 2001 where they will discuss the different projects of the Metropolitan Council.
3 He encouraged other Councilmembers to attend.
4 XII. . INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
5 Councilmember Faust stated that he had attended a League of Minnesota Cities Policy Adoption
6 Conference on November 16, 2001 where they adopted the League of Minnesota Cities Top Ten
7 Priorities which will be contained in the League of Minnesota Cities newsletter. He added it was
8 good to be back to re-establish some contacts.
9 Mayor Hodson indicated that he was starting a"Coffee With the Mayor"get-together on
10 Saturday morning, December 1, 2001 from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. in Council Chambers.
11 XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
12 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to adjourn the meeting at 9:13 p.m.
13 Motion carried unanimously.
14 Respectfully submitted,
015 Courtney Seesz
16 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
17
18 Mayor
19 ATTEST:
20 City Clerk
•
10
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: December 11, 2001 Approval:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors License:
PCL Construction Services, Inc., Burnsville, MN
•
:-'C FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLA
- _/04/2001 15: Check: Register GL540R-VO6.27. PAGE
- HANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
FIRS--BREMER-BANK=NA- - ---- ------- -- --
- 008216 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 16385 12/12/01. 228.43
- 000020 AA-HAT-T-ERY-00 ------ 16386-12/-12/01 141-.-05----
= 008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 16387 12/12/01 822.00
005201 AMERICAN STORES 16388 12/12/01 23.88
------008450 -ANIMAL.-CONTROL-SERVICES,----- ---16389---12/-12/01.---- -476-.68 -
004271 AT&T BROADBAND 16390 12/12/01 4.65
- 008255 AVAYA, INC . 16391 12/12/01 29 .32
------008708.- -BE-T-T-ENDORF-ROHRER--KNOCHE--------16392--12/12-/01----- 1-1-,-075:00------
-= 000430 BRIGHTON AUTO ELECTRIC 16393 12/12/01. 57 .51
008672 BROADWAY PIZZA 16394 12/12/01 75.00
. -- 000535-----BUREAU-OF-CRIMINAL--APPRE---- ----1 6395-12-/1 2./01.--- '0.00-----
008652 CARTRIDGE CARE 16396 12/12/01 192.75
007386 CASTLE INSPECTION SERVIC 16397 12/12/01 4,212.57
- 000741-----COI\INELLY--ELECTRONICS--------- - -- -16398--12/12/01------ --
.00001 CORBETT/BLYTHE 16399 12/ 12/01 50.00
008736 CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT 16400 12/12/01 157. 15
_-.-___-008743----DELL--MARKETING,---INC ----
007371 DISCOUNT STEEL, INC . 16402 1.2/12/01 9.83
008842 FABYANSKF_, WESTRA & HART 16403 12/12/01 3,648.20
-008265-----FI RSTAR-CORPORATE--TRUST-- -------------- -16404 - 12/12/01 - _443.38 --- -
008744 FOUR POINTS HOTEL MINNEA 16405 12/12/01. 31 .44
008647 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 16406 12/12/01 158. 19
-------001025..------.G - � -K_SERVICES-- -----------------------.............16407-12/-12/01. -------- -------143.60---- --
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 16408 12/12/01 274. 13
.00002 GIBSON/JOSEPH 16409 12/12/01 50.00
_. ____-.___008050-----_.----GOPHER..CASH-.REG --CO -- ----- -- ._ -16410 .
008853 HAGE CONCRETE WORKS 16411 12/12/01 963.34
001410 HARMON AUTOGLASS 16412 12/12/01 244.77
001420------.__HAWKINS.--WATER_TREATMENT ___._...___16423 --12/12/0 ---47.7--.43.-----
.00003 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 16414 12/12/01 25. 10
_ 005017 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 16415 12/12/01 359.00
_.._--.__008432-_---HENI\IEP_IN.-COUNT_Y_TREASURE_..__.________16416
008699 HEWITT/JOEL 16417 12/12/01 289. 15
008627 HORST/RICHARD 16418 12/12/0.1 35.95
--____--.0.0004.-----JOHNSON/MATTHEW ..--_--- -- ---
008847 LAUGHTER/PAT 16420 12/12/01 138.00
_ 008254 LMCIT % BERKLEY ADMINIST 16421 12/12/01 14,223.75
----..._.MA000EEN-EQUIPMENT_.. CO.-___._-.- -_.__.._.__-_.16422...
002125 MALENICK/JOHN 16423 12/ 12/01 100.00
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC . TEC 16424 12/12/01 1 ,551 .02
_____METRO._ FIRE .- -._-- ------.-- --- ------ _.._--- -- -16425 _-_--
007835 METROCALL 16426 12/12/01 16.26
002240 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 16427 12/ 12/01. 50,366.33
007159.-. h1APA_...AUTO . PARTS.- . _. 16428 12/12/01 _24.59__. _.
002630 NORTH STAR TURF INC_ 16429 12/12/01 108.86
008852 PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION 16430 12/12/01 45, 142.33
008631 PARTS PLUS ROSEVILLE _ _ 16431 12/12/01. _._ 58 .25 ...
.00005 PINE LAKE COMMUNICATIONS 16432 12/12/01 404.38
12
• C FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILL
- _/04/2001 15: Check Register GL540R=V06.27 PAGE
BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
-= F_I.RS_BREMER—BANK-NA--- ------ -- --
004492 QWF_ST 16433 12/12/01 61 .27
- -OOS462 -RAMSEY--COUNTY -- —16434-12/-12/-01- 6-,03-1-.06-
002380 RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC 16435 12/ 12/01 2,216.72
.00008 RICHARD SLETTEN 16436 12/12/01 50.00
0.0-0.06. ROYALTON—HTG--$—COOLING----------1 6437-12/-12/0 3.--- 55..00
003350 SEH—RCM. 16438 12/12/01 1 ,785.63
003490 STREICHF_R 'S 16439 12/ 12/01 21 .25
-_ -0.084.1.6 SUPERI0 R—SIGNALS,-1 NG.-- ----16440--12/--12/01 --- 30-.00----
008840 THOMAS WALKER CONSULTUNG 16441 12/12/01 11080.00
007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 16442 12/12/01 358.50
0.03560 TRACY—PRINTING — --16443-12/-3.2/0 J.- -86,i-00--
008695 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT AN 16444 12/12/01 185.31
004481 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 16445 12/12/01 41 .41
---0.08336- UNI.TED.-ELECTRIC—COMPANY----------16446.---12/-12/01— - 39- 96----
008264 URS BRW 16447 12/12/03. 8,622 .00
003710 VAN O LITE INC 16448 12/12/01 11 .85
_-__---00822.7-__._-__VERIZON.—WIRELESS,_BELLEV--.-_--------- -.16449-- 12/.12/03..-.-----.-------.-----.758..12----
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT — BLAIN 16450 12/12/01 260.77
.00007 WM. ZAWISLAK 16451 12/12/03: '15.00
_.008273_--___WSB_.c4,_.ASSOC IA.TES,--INC --- _- -------_- .16452 -.3.2/-12/01 -.-.------.----Af4.1.688.44.------
_ 003820 ZAHI_ EQUIPMENT COMPANY 16453 12/ 12/03. 66.45
- - ----- BREMER_BANK_NA.----- -- --- -- --- ---._.. _. - — . . .. ... __._.. -- -.......209,..949.84 -
•
_
���
���
` C-F-INANC-IAL-SYSTEM--- ------'-------'----- ANTHONY--VILLAGE
�3O�2OO1 1O: Check Register GL54OR-VO6.27 PAGE 1
.
--BANK-----'-----VENDOR---------------'--'--------CHECK#--'DATE-----------AMOUNT
-- -
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
00880 ` BREMER BANK NA 19896 11/30/01 6,000.00
008880 BREMER BANK NA 19897 11/30/01 15,000.00
--'---OO8716---SCENE/THE---------�-----------19898-11f3O/O1 - ------13O�OO----
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19899 11/30/01 150.00
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19900 11/30/O1 81000 .00
-'---OO88OO -- BREMER'BANK-NA---------''---- ---199O1'11f3O/O1 --- -15;000�OO - --
008716 SCENE/THE 19902 11/30/01 130.00
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19903 11/30/01 150.00
----OO414-1---'FRITZ-COMPANY;- -[NC�--------- '--199O4-11f30/O1 ------3;023�64- -
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 19905 11/30/01 42.00
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19906 11/30/O1 6,000.00
---BREMER BANK-NA--------'-'-----199O7 11/3O/O1'--'---15�O00�0O -----
008716 SCENE/THE 19908 11/30/01 130.00
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19909 11/30/01 150.00
----004141--- 'FRITZ'COMPANY,-'-INC ---- .......1 ;798�15 '
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19911 11/30/01 8,000.00
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19912 11/30/01 15,000.00
----'OO8716--' 19913 11/30/01
0 04250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19914 11/30/O1 15O.00
.00001 MCLEOD USA 19915 11/30/01 234.75
-FRITZ COMPANYr-INC . -�- - ' 19916 - 11/30/01 57-072;20 -
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19917 11/30/01 8,000.0O
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19918 11/30/O1 15,000.00
---OO9716 - SCENE/THE - - -�- - - -' 19919 11/30/01 -280 OO
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 19921 11/30/01 25,000.00
--'--- LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
- --------'-- -- - ' - --- - ---' -- ' - -- ' -
��
14
PEM ---- ------- - --- ------------ST. --ANTHONY-VILL
12/06/2001 10: Check Register GL540R-VO6.27 PAGE
--BAN K-- -------VENDOR -- ---- ----CHECK#----DATE----- -------AMOUNT---
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
- 008216 A T c4. T . WIRELESS SERVICE 20101 12/12/01 32.53
008311 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRI 20102 12/12/01 617.80
--- -- 004225--- At LIANT--FOODSERVICE - ---20103 -12/12/0].----- 3-7-427-.58---
004014 ALLIED PAPER CO. 20104 12/12/01 35.50
- 004015 AMERIPRIDE LINEN 20105 12/.12/01 341 .38
-- --- - -008794 ------ARCTIC-- GLACIER-ICE ---- --- 20106 -].2/12/01 -------- ----573-:55-- -
008692 AT&T BROADBAND 20107 12/ 12/01 151 .28
004•293 BELLBOY CORP. 20108 12/12/01 1 ,588.71
------ 008827------ BLAC KEY'S --BAKERY------ --------- - 20109 -12/12/01 --
- 004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO. , 20110 12/12/01 2,627.05
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 20111 12/12/01 22,556.25
-- -004095------COCA - COLA -BOTTL-IhIG---- --- - -- 201-12 -12/12/01 ------ 1-,-677- 77--
008557 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 20113 12/ 12/0]. 427.25
004120 EAGLE WINE - CO 20114 12/12/01 2,232.38
----
004125--- EAST-SIDE- BEVERAGE--CO------ ---- - _ - 20115--12/12/01 -- - --34;-407.82 -
- 004130 ECOLAB 20116 12/12/01 149.05
008697 EXTREME_ BEVERAGE 20117 12/ 12/03. 64.00
- 008265 FIRSTAR CORPORATE -TRUST- - - - 20118 12/12/01 -- 168°38
008359 FLAHERTY 'S HAPPY TYME CO 20119 12/12/01. 163.20
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 20120 12/12/01 558.83
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC-. - 20121 - 12/12/01. i X567-.00
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 20122 12/12/01 7,520. 13
004201 HEGGIES PIZZA 20123 12/12/01 230. 10
004207 HOHENSTEIN 'S, INC 20124 12/12/01 - 2,732.80
004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 20125 ].2/12/01 9,223.07
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 20126 12/12/01 52, 132.63
-- 002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE- 20127 12/12/01 - - -105.00
008254 LMCIT % BERKLEY ADMINIST 20128 12/12/01 3,605.25
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 20129 12/12/01 26,422 .83
008263-- MCLEOD USA,, -INC . --TEC 20130 12/12/01 657:62
004334 NORTHEASTER 20131 12/12/01 168.30
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 20132 12/12/01 42.96
004354 PAUSTIS ct SONS - - - - 20133 12/12/01 - - - 2;686 .59
004355 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 20134 12/12/01 .546.34
004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 20135 12/12/01 13,381 .92
004361- PINNACLE DIST. - -- - 20136 12/12/01 192.56
009770 PORTER/WILLIAM 20137 12/12/01 67 .00
- 004376 PRIOR WINE CO 20138 12/12/01 4, 113.30
004385 QUALITY WINE CO - - 20139 12/ 12/01 21 ,525.22
008597 R.D. HANSON ASSOC . , INC . 20140 12/12/01 120.75
008824 TRI-COUNTY BEVERAGE, INC 20141 12/ 12/01 71 .80
003710 VAN 0 LITE INC 20142 12/12/01 28.37
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 20143 12/12/01 327.38
008316 WINE COMPANY/THE 20144 12/12/01 1 ,333.39
• 008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 20145 12/ 12/01 504. 14
003840 ZEP MFG. COMPANY 20146 1.2/12/01 51 . 10
LIQUOR CHECKING, ACCOUNT 220,292 .56
15
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 01-092
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMITTAL OF THE 2002 RAMSEY COUNTY
SCORE FUNDING GRANT APPLICATION AND
ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT FOR THIS PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Ramsey County has made a portion of its SCORE funding grant revenues available
to the City for its municipal source-separated recyclables program; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has completed the required grant application; and
WHEREAS, the funds would be used for the City's source-separated recyclables program.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony`
Hereby approves the submittal of the 2002 Ramsey County SCORE Funding Grant Applicafion
and enter into a contract for this program.
Adopted this day of . 2001.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
•
16
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 01-093
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CLEANING SERVICE
FOR THE ST. ANTHONY CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER
WHEREAS, the current cleaning service contract for the St. Anthony City Hall/Community Center
will expire on December 31, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the City sought bids and two bids were received for this service as follows:
Town and Country Cleaning Services $48,760 per year
Compton Cleaning Service Company $45,240 per year
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council of the City of St. Anthony
• hereby approves the bid from Compton Cleaning Service in the amount of$45,240 per year for
cleaning services at the St. Anthony City Hall/Community Center for 2002 and 2003.
Adopted this day of . 2001.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
17
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 4, 2001
TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Jay Hartman, Director of Public Works
ITEM: Cleaning Service Contract
The City advertised and received two (2) bids for the cleaning service contract for
City Hall, Police Department and all of Community Services common areas. The
bid opening was on November 16, 2001 with the following results.
• Town and Country Cleaning Services - $48,760 per year
• Compton Cleaning Service Company- $45,240 per year
It is my recommendation that the City continue using Compton Cleaning Service
for the next two years, 2002 and 2003. They have indicated that the contract price
will remain the same for both 2002 and 2003.
Compton has not increased their yearly cleaning fees since 1997.
Please contact me with any questions.
Jay
l�
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
• ORDINANCE 2001-004
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS
AND FACILITIES;REPEALING SECTION 1160 OF CHAPTER 11,AND ADDING SECTION
1680 TO CHAPTER 16 OF THE 1993 ST.ANTHONY CODE OF ORDINANCES
The City Council of the City of St.Anthony hereby ordains:
Section 1. Chapter 11,Section 1160,Antennas and Towers,is hereby repealed.
Section 2. Chapter 16 is hereby amended to add Section 1680,Wireless Telecommunication Towers and
Facilities; to read in its entirety as follows:
1680.01. Council Findings. The Communications Act of 1934 as amended by the
Telecommunication Act of 1996 grants the Federal Communications Commission jurisdiction
over many aspects of telecommunications services. The City's regulation of Towers and WTFs
in the City will not have the effect of prohibiting any person from providing wireless
telecommunications services in violation of the Act.
1680.02. Purpose. The general purpose of this Section is to regulate the placement,
construction, and modification of Towers and WTFs in order to protect the health, safety, and
welfare of the public, while at the same time encouraging the development of the competitive
wireless telecommunications marketplace in the City. The specific purposes of this Section are:
(a) To allow the location of telecommunication Towers and WTFs in the Ciw
(b) To protect.residential areas from potential adverse impact of Towers and WTFs;
(c) To minimize adverse visual impact of Towers and WTFs through careful design,
siting, landscaping, and innovative camouflaging techniques;
(d) To promote and encourage shared collocation of Towers and Antenna support
structures as a primary option rather than construction of additional single use
Towers;
(e) To promote and encourage utilization of technological designs that will either
eliminate or reduce the need for erection of new Tower structures to support.
WTFs;
(f) To avoid potential damage to property caused by Towers and WTFs by ensuring
such structures are soundly and carefully designed, constructed, modified,
maintained, and removed when no longer used or are determined to be
structurally unsound;
(g) To ensure that Towers and WTFs are compatible with surrounding land uses;
® (h) To overcome the potential adverse impacts that poorly or unregulated Towers and
WTFs could have on the public health, safety and welfare; and
(i) Enhance the ability of the providers of telecommunications services to provide
such services to the community quickly, effectively,and efficiently.
19
1680.03. Definitions. For the purposes of this Section,the following terms,phrases, words, and
their derivatives shall have the meanings stated below:
Subd. 1. Antenna. Any exterior transmitting or receiving device mounted on a Tower,
building or other structure and used in communications that radiate or capture electromagnetic
waves, digital signals,analog signals, radio frequencies (excluding radar signals), wireless
telecommunication signals or other communication signals.
Subd. 2. Collocation. The sharing of structures by two or more wireless service
providers on a single support structure or otherwise sharing a common location.
Subd. 3. Dish Antenna. A parabolic shaped antenna(including all supporting apparatus)
which is used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication,television or radio signals, which
is located on the exterior of, or outside of, any building or structure.
Subd. 4. Height. When referring to a Tower or other structure,the distance measured
from the finished grade of the parcel to the highest point on the Tower or other structure,
including the base pad and any Antenna.
Subd. 5. Monopole. A slender self-supporting Tower used to support
telecommunications equipment.
Subd. 6. Tower. Any pole, spire, or other structure, including supporting lines; cables,
wires, braces and masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an Antenna or similar
apparatus above grade.
Subd. 7. Wireless Telecommunications Facility(WTF). Any cables,wires, lines, wave
guides,Antennas, and any other equipment or facilities associated with the transmission or
reception of communications (other than radio or television broadcast communications) which a
person seeks to locate or have installed upon or near a Tower,building or structure, but shall not
include:
(a) Any satellite earth station Antenna two meters in diameter or less which is located
in any light industrial or commercial zoning district;
(b) Any satellite earth station reception Antenna one meter or less in diameter,
regardless of zoning district;
(c) Automatic meter reading systems;
(d) Military, federal, state and local government communication Towers and
Antennas used for navigational purposes, emergency preparedness or public
safety purposes; and .
(e) A WTF to the extent that a permit issued by the Federal Communications
• Commission or state authority specifically provides that such WTF is exempt
from local regulation.
2
2®
• Section 1680.04. Towers and Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Building and Design
Standards. All Towers and WTFs must be constructed in accordance with the following
standards:
Subd. 1. Si ling WTFs located on or attached to existing structures are regulated by the
provisions of the zoning district for each parcel. Towers may only be located on parcels within
commercial and light industrial zoning districts(as defined by the City's zoning and land use
regulations) and on City-owned property. Towers are not permitted in public rights-of-way.
Subd. 2. Color and Architecture. All WTFs shall be concealed or camouflaged and shall
utilize materials, colors,textures, screening and landscaping to blend in with the surrounding
natural setting and built environment. If a WTF is proposed on any part of a building or
structure, it must blend with such structure's design, architecture and color, including exterior
finish. The term"camouflage" shall not mean invisible,but rather appearing as part of another
structure, such as a building,wall or roof, or designed to appear as another structure, suclf-as a
building, clock tower, chimney, flag pole, light pole or tree.
Subd. 3. Landscaping. The following requirements shall govern the landscaping
surrounding Towers; provided, however,that the City Council, after considering the
recommendation of City staff, may waive such requirements if the visual impact of a proposed
Tower or WTF would be minimal or if the purposes of this Section would otherwise be better
served thereby.
(a) Tower facilities shall be landscaped with a buffer of plant materials that
effectively screens the view of the Tower compound from property used for
residences. The standard buffer shall consist of a landscaped strip at least four(4)
feet wide outside the perimeter of the compound.
(b) Existing mature tree growth and natural land forms on the site shall be preserved
to the maximum extent possible. In some cases, such as Towers sited on large,
wooded lots, natural growth around the property perimeter may be sufficient
buffer. Existing mature trees and other vegetation at the site shall be preserved to
the maximum extent possible.
Subd..4. Sims. The use of any portion of a Tower or WTF for signs or.advertising other
than warning or equipment information signs is prohibited.
Subd. 5. Lighting. WTFs or Towers shall not be illuminated by artificial means and
shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation
Administration or other federal or state authority. When incorporated into the approved design of
a WTF, light fixtures used to illuminate ball fields, parking lots or similar areas may be attached
to the Tower.
Subd. 6. Monopole.New Towers shall be of a monopole design, without guide wires,
unless the City Council determines that an alternative design would better blend into the
surrounding environment.
3
21
Subd. 7. Setback s. Towers d W F s s hall comply with the principal structur e
setbacks
of the underlying zoning district and the following additional standards:
(a) The Tower or WTF is set back from all residential dwellings at least one (1) foot
for each foot in height.
(b) Towers and WTFs shall not encroach upon any easements unless permission is
obtained from the underlying property owner and holder of the easement.
(c) Towers and WTFs shall not be located between a principal structure and a public
street.
(d) The required setbacks may be reduced or the location in relation to a public street
modified, at the sole discretion of the City,when the WTF is integrated into an
existing or proposed structure such as a building, light or utility pole. =
Subd. 8. Height.
(a) The height of any Tower shall not exceed seventy-five (75) feet.
(b) Antennas located on an existing structure that is taller than the limit allowed in the
• underlying zoning district may extend up to five (5) feet above the height of the
structure. ,
Subd. 9. Safety and Environmental Standards.
(a) Building codes; safety standards. To ensure the structural integrity of Towers,the
owner of a Tower shall ensure that it is maintained in compliance with standards
contained in applicable state or local building codes and the applicable standards
for Towers that are published by the Electronic Industries Association, as
amended from time to time. If, upon inspection, the City concludes that a Tower
fails to comply with such codes and standards and constitutes a danger to persons
or property, then upon notice being provided to the owner of the Tower, the
owner shall.have thirty (30) days to bring such Tower into compliance with such
standards. Failure to bring such Tower into compliance within such 30-day period
shall constitute grounds for the removal of the.Tower or Antenna at the owner's
expense.
(b) Interference with Public Safety Telecommunications. No Tower or WTF shall
interfere with public safety telecommunications. All Towers and WTFs shall
comply with FCC regulations and licensing requirements.
(c) Security Fencing. Towers shall be enclosed by security fencing not less than six
feet in height and shall also be equipped with an appropriate anti-climbing device;
provided however, that the City Council, after considering the recommendations
of the City staff, may waive such requirements, as it deems appropriate.
4
22
(d) Noise. If the proposed WTF includes equipment that causes or a WTF otherwise
causes significant increased sound levels, sound buffers may be required
including but not limited to,baffling,barriers,enclosures,walls and plantings.
(e) Radio Frequency Emissions and Interference. WTFs must comply with Federal
Communication Commission standards for radio frequency emissions and
interference.
(f) Risk of Danger. Towers and WTFs shall not pose an unreasonable risk of
explosion, fire or other danger due to its proximity to volatile, flammable,
explosive or hazardous materials.
(g) Maintenance. All commercial Towers or WTFs shall at all times (i) be kept and
maintained in good condition, order, and repair so that the same shall not menace
or endanger the life or property of any person, and (ii) allow sufficient access for
service vehicles and personnel.
Subd. 10. Collocation Requirements. To every extent possible:
(a) All proposed WTFs shall be placed on an existing Tower, building or structure
located within one-half mile of the desired location for such proposed WTF;
® (b) All wireless telecommunication providers shall cooperate with each other 'rim.
collocating WTFs and shall exercise good faith in collocating with other licensed
carriers and in the sharing of sites, including the sharing of technical information
necessary to evaluate the feasibility of collocation. In the event a dispute arises as
to a collocation issue, the City may require a third-party technical study to
evaluate the feasibility of collocating at the expense of either or both wireless
telecommunications providers;
(c) All new Towers and any pre-existing Tower owned by a wireless
telecommunications provider shall be made available for use by the owner or
initial user thereof, together with as many other licensed carriers as can be
technically located thereon;
(d) If determined appropriate by the City, all new Towers shall be designed and
constructed in such a manner as to accommodate at least one other comparable
WTF in addition to the applicant's; and
(e) All new wireless telecommunications Towers that are less than seventy-five
(75) feet shall be designed and constructed in a manner that allows such Tower
to be expanded to a height of seventy-five (75)feet in order to allow for future
collocation.
5
23
Subd. 11. Exceptions to Collocation. The City may waive any or all of the collocation
requirements if it is determined that:
(a) The planned WTF would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or
approved Tower, building or structure, as documented by a qualified and licensed
professional engineer, and the existing or approved Tower,building or-structure
cannot be reinforced, modified, or replaced to accommodate planned or
equivalent equipment.
(b) The planned WTF would cause interference materially impacting the usability of
other existing or planned WTFs at the structure as documented by a qualified
radio frequency engineer selected by the City and the interference cannot be
prevented.
(c) No existing Tower, building or structure within an applicant's search radius can
or will accommodate the planned equipment at a height necessary to function
reasonably as documented by a qualified radio frequency engineer selected by the
City.
Section 1680.05. Permitted Uses/Administrative Approval. Towers and WTFs shall be a
permitted use in a Light Industrial district, as described in Section 1610 of the Code, and on
City-owned property. Towers and WTFs proposed in a Light Industrial district or on City-
owned property may be administratively approved.
Subd. 1. The following provisions shall govern the issuance of administrative approvals
for Towers and WTFs:
(a) Each applicant for administrative approval shall submit an application to the City
Manager providing the information set forth in Section 1680.07,when applicable,
and a nonrefundable fee as established by resolution of the City Council to
reimburse the City for the costs of reviewing the application.
(b) The City Manager shall review an application for administrative approval of a
Tower or WTF and determine if the proposed use complies with this Section.
(c) The City Manager shall respond to each such application within sixty(60) days
after the filing of the application by either approving or denying the application.
If the City Manager fails to respond to the applicant within said sixty(60) days,
then the application shall be deemed to be approved,unless said time has been
extended under Minnesota Statutes, Section 15.99.
(d) In connection with any such administrative approval,the City Manager may, in
order to encourage shared use, or the use of alternative Tower structures,
administratively waive or modify any zoning district setback requirements in or
• separation distances between Towers by up to fifty percent(50%).
6
24
(e) If an administrative approval is denied,the applicant may file an appeal to the
City ouncil. Any appeal must be filed by the applicant within thirty(30)days of
tY P
the receipt of the City Manager's decision.
Subd. 2.The following uses may be approved by the City Manager after conducting an
administrative review:
(a) Locating a Tower or WTF, including the placement of additional buildings or
other supporting equipment used in connection with a Tower or WTF, in any
Light Industrial district or on city-owned property.
(b) Locating Antennas on existing structures or Towers consistent with the terms of
subsections (a) and (b)below:
(1) Antennas on existing structures. Any WTF proposed to be affixed to an
existin g g buildin or structure maybe approved by the City Manager as an
accessory use to such building or structure,provided: (i)the Antenna does
not extend more than thirty(3 0) feet above the highest point of the
building or structure; (ii) the Antenna complies with all applicable federal
regulations; an d(iii)the Antenna complies with all applicable building
codes.
(2) Antennas on existing Towers. Any WTF which is proposed to be attached
to an existing Tower may be administratively approved by the City` .
Manager and, to minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the
proliferation and clustering of Towers, collocation of Antennas by more
than one carrier on existing Towers shall take precedence over the
construction of new Towers,provided such collocation is accomplished in
a manner consistent with the following: (i) a Tower which is modified or
reconstructed to accommodate the collocation of an additional Antenna
shall be of the same Tower type as the existing Tower, unless the City
Manager allows reconstruction as a monopole.
Section 1680.06. Permitted Conditional Uses.
Subd. 1. General.. Unless a permitted use in accordance with Section 1680.05, a Tower
or WTF shall be permitted only if a conditional use permit has been issued for that use by
the City Council. The following provisions shall govern the issuance of conditional use
permits for Towers or WTFs by the City Council:
(a) Applications for conditional use permits under this Section shall be subject to the
procedures and requirements of Section 1665.04 of this Code, except as modified
in this Section.
•
7
25
(b) In granting a conditional use permit,the City Council may impose conditions to
the extent necessary to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed Tower or
WTF on adjoining properties.
(c) Any information of an engineering nature that the applicant submits, whether
civil, mechanical, or electrical, shall be certified by a licensed professional.
engineer.
(d) An applicant for a conditional use permit shall submit the information described
in this Section and a non-refundable fee as established by resolution of the City
Council to reimburse the City for the costs of reviewing the application.
Subd. 2. Towers. In addition to any information required for applications for conditional
use permits pursuant to Section 1665.04 of this Code, applicants for a conditional use permit for
a Tower shall submit the following information:
(a) A scaled site plan clearly indicating the location,type and height of the proposed
Tower, on-site land uses and zoning, adjacent land uses and zoning, adjacent
roadways,proposed means of access, setbacks from property lines, elevation
drawings of the proposed Tower and any other structures,topography, parking,
and other information deemed by the City staff to be necessary to assess
compliance with this Section.
The legal description of the property on which the proposed Tower is to bd
constructed.
(c) The setback distance between the proposed Tower and the nearest residential
property.
(d) The separation distance from other Towers and, if known,-the type of construction
of the existing Tower(s) and the identity of the owner(s)/operator(s) of the
existing Tower(s).
(e) A landscape plan showing specific landscape materials.
(f) Method of fencing, and finished color and, if applicable,the method of
camouflage.
(g) A statement of compliance with all applicable federal, state or local laws.
(h) A notarized statement by the applicant as to whether construction of the Tower
will accommodate collocation of additional Antennas for future users.
(i) A description of the suitability of the use of existing Towers, other structures or
• alternative technology not requiring the use of a Tower or new structure to
provide the services to be provided through the use of the proposed new Tower.
8
26
(j) A description of the feasible location(s)of future Towers or WTFs within the City
based upon existing physical, engirieering,technological or geographical
limitations in the event the proposed Tower is erected.
Subd. 3. Factors considered in granting conditional use permits for Towers. In addition
to any standards for consideration of conditional use permit, applications pursuant to Section
1665.04 of this Code,the City Council shall consider the following factors in determining
whether to issue a conditional use permit, no one of which shall be conclusive, although the City
Council may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if City
staff or City Council concludes that the goals of this chapter are better served thereby:
(a) Height of the proposed Tower;
(b) Proximity of the Tower to residential structures and residential district
boundaries;
(c) Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties;
(d) Surrounding topography;
(e) Surrounding tree coverage and foliage;
• (f) Design of the Tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have
the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness;
(g) Proposed ingress and egress; and
(h) Availability of suitable existing Towers, other structures, or alternative
technologies not requiring the use of Towers or structures.
Sub d. 4. No new Tower shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the
reasonable satisfaction of the City Council,that there is no existing Tower, structure or
alternative technology not requiring a Tower or structure,that can accommodate the applicant's
proposed WTF or Tower. An applicant shall submit information requested by the City Council
related to the availability of suitable existing Towers, other structures or alternative technology.
Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing Tower, structure or alternative technology
can accommodate the applicant's proposed WTF may consist of any of the following:
(a) No existing Tower or structure is located within the geographic area that meet
applicants engineering requirements.
(b) Existing Towers or structures are not of sufficient height to meet applicant's
engineering requirements.
• (c) Existing Towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support
applicant's proposed WTF and related equipment.
9
27
(d) The applicants proposed WTF would cause electromagnetic interference with one
or more WTFs on existing Towers br structures, or a WTF on the existing Towers
or structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed WTF.
(e) The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share
an existing Tower or structure or to adapt an existing Tower or structure for
sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new Tower development are
presumed to be unreasonable.
(f) The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render
existing Towers and structures unsuitable.
(g) The applicant demonstrates that an alternative technology that does not require
the use of Towers or structures, such as a cable microcell network using multiple
low-powered transmitters/receivers attached to a wireline system, is unsuitable.
Costs of alternative technology that exceed new Tower or Antenna development
shall not be presumed to render the technology unsuitable.
Subd. 5. Separation. All Towers for which a conditional use permit is required shall be
separated by a minimum of seven hundred fifty(750) feet between the proposed Tower and any
pre-existing Tower; provided,however, that the City Council, after considering any
® recommendations of City staff, may reduce.the standard separation requirements if the purposes
of this Section would be better served thereby. The separation distance shall be measured by
drawing or following a straight line between the base of the existing Tower and the proposed
base,pursuant to a site plan, of the proposed Tower.
Section 1680.07. Applications for Towers and WTFs.
Subd. 1. Application. In addition to an applicant's name, address, proposed site for a
WTF Antenna or Tower, site plan, grading and landscaping plans, written permission of the
property owner(unless such property owner is the City), and other such similar information, an
application for a conditional use permit, building or other permit relating to the installation or
construction of a WTF or Tower, the applicant shall include the following:
(a) A statement indicating that failure to comply with the conditions of approval
shall result in the revocation of the permit and removal of the WTF and/or Tower.
(b) A statement indicating that the expenses incurred by the City to enforce the
provisions of the permit shall be reimbursed by the applicant.
(c) A statement which requires the applicant to utilize the procedures established by
the Federal Communications Commission to resolve any complaints received
relating to interference allegedly caused by the facility.
10
28
(d) A statement indicating the applicant will cooperate in good faith and fair dealing.
in collocating WTFs.
(e) A statement indicating that the WTF or Tower will be maintained in good.and
safe condition and its original appearance and concealment, disguise or
camouflage elements incorporated into the design at the time of approval shall be
preserved. Such maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, painting,repair
of equipment, and maintenance of landscaping.
(f) A statement authorizing the City to enter the property for the purpose of periodic
inspections to determine that the site complies with the provisions of this Section,
any conditions of approval and all safety and building codes and permits issued.
This statement shall give the City the right to conduct such inspections at any time
upon reasonable notice to the property owner(s), and that all expenses related to
such inspection shall be borne by the applicant.
(g) A statement indicating that the applicant understands that a Tower or WTF which
has not been used for twelve (12) successive months shall be deemed abandoned
and may, at the sole discretion of the City,be required to be removed in the same
manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for dangerous or unsafe structures
established by Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.16.
(h) A written acknowledgment of the property owner indicating that the removal of
any unused or abandoned Tower or WTF or portions of any such Towers dr .
WTFs are ultimately the responsibility of the property owner.
(i) A statement requiring the applicant to notify the City that the WTF continues to
be in operation. The notice of continuing operation shall be hand delivered or sent
to the City Manager annually by certified.mail during the last two weeks of the
month of December.
Subd. 2. Escrowed Funds. At the time of application for a Tower or WTF conditional use
or building permit, an escrow deposit shall be posted in an amount determined from time to time
by City Council resolution. No interest shall accrue on any such escrowed funds. The City may
charge against this deposit to recover its costs for reviewing the Tower or WTF application.
These costs may include, but are not limited to, City staff time over and above that covered by
the application fee, consultants' fees, and fees for third-party review. If a Tower or WTF permit
is approved, as a condition of approval, deposit of additional escrow funds may be required. The
City will charge against this deposit to offset the City's costs to monitor construction and ensure
compliance with the conditions of approval and standards in this Section. These charges may
include, but are not limited to, City staff time, consultants' fees, and fees for third-party review,
monitoring, and inspection. Once construction has been completed and the applicant has
complied with all conditions of approval, any remaining deposit funds shall be refunded to the
party, or entity that posted the escrow deposit. Refunds of the deposit shall not be construed to
• limit the City's ability to recover future costs associated with review or monitoring on-going
operation of the WTF or future modifications, amendments, or transfer of the facility.
11
29
Subd. 3. Assessments. In the event the City incurs charges relating to the enforcement of
this Section, including without limitation expenses relating to third-party consultants and
removal of abandoned Towers and WTFs,the City reserves the right to assess the property
owner for such charges in the same manner in which the City assesses and collects real property
taxes.
Section 1680.08. Nonconforming Uses.
Subd. 1. Collocation of Additional Antennas. Antennas that are collocated, in
accordance with the provisions of this Section, shall not be deemed to constitute the expansion of
a nonconforming use or structure.
Subd. 2. Preexisting Towers. Preexisting Towers shall be allowed to continue their
usage as they presently exist. Routine maintenance shall be permitted on such preexisting
Towers. New construction other than routine maintenance on a preexisting Tower shall comply
with the requirements of this Section.
Subd. 3. Rebuilding damaged or destroyed nonconforming Towers or Antennas. A
nonconforming Tower, Antenna or WTF that is damaged or destroyed by wind, storm, fire or
similar acts of God may be rebuilt without having to first obtain administrative approval or a
conditional use permit. The type, height, and location of the Tower or WTF shall be of the same
type and intensity as the original facility approval. Building permits to rebuild the facility shall
comply with the then applicable building codes and shall be obtained within 180 days frdm the
date the facility is damaged or destroyed. If no permit is obtained or if said permit expires, the
Tower or Antenna shall be deemed abandoned as specified in Section 1680.09.
Subd. 4. Nonconforming Use/Abandonment. A nonconforming Tower or WTF that
becomes nonfunctional for thirty(30) consecutive days shall be deemed abandoned.
Section 1680.09. Removal of Abandoned Towers and WTFs. Any Tower or WTF that is not
operated for a continuous period of twelve (12) months shall be considered abandoned, and the
owner of such Tower or WTF shall remove the same within ninety(90) days of receipt of notice
from the City of such abandonment. Failure to remove an abandoned Tower or WTF within
such 90-day period shall be grounds for the City to remove the Tower or WTF at the property
owner's expense. If there are two or more users of a single Tower,then this provision shall not
P g P
become effective until all users cease using the Tower for a continuous period of twelve (12)
months.
Section 1680.10. Regulation of Dish Antennas.
Subd. 1. Permits. No Dish Antenna may be erected, constructed or placed, or re-erected,
re-constructed or replaced, anywhere'within the City without first making an application for and
obtaining a permit from the City, except for the following:
12
3®
• (a) Dish Antennas not greater than nine square feet in cross sectional area,
which do not exceed six feet in height as measured from the base of the
Dish Antenna to the highest point of the Dish Antenna.
(b) Dish Antennas and towers erected or constructed by the City for City
purposes.
Subd. 2. Location. The following additional requirements apply Dish Antennas located
in any residential district:
(a) Dish Antennas greater than nine square feet in area may not be located on
the roof or exterior wall of a principal or accessory building.
(b) Dish Antennas may be located only in the rear yard.
(c) No Dish Antenna may be located or maintained, at any time,permanently
or temporarily, closer to the allowed buildable area of a principal building
on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building on the lot on which it
is located.
Subd. 3. Screening. The Building Official may require, as a condition to a permit,that a
Dish Antenna installed in a nonresidential district be screened from residential districts located
• within 100 feet of the Dish Antenna. .
Subd. 4. Height. Dish Antennas in residential districts may not be in excess of 12 feet in
height, measured from the ground elevation at the base of the Dish Antenna to the highest point
of the Dish Antenna. In all other zoning districts, Dish Antennas may have an overall height of
no more than 18 feet for either a ground mount or roof mount, as measured from the point at
which the antenna is mounted to the roof or the ground elevation to the highest point of the Dish
Antenna.
Section 1680.11. Repeal of Section 1160. Section 1160 of the City's Code of Ordinances is
hereby repealed in its entirety.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective as of the date of its publication.
First Reading: November 27, ?nni
Second Reading: December 11, 2001
Adopted:
Mayor
• ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
IX. Public Hearings
A. Resolution 01-094
31
CITY OF ST ANTHONY
RESOLUTION#01-094
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2002 TAX LEVY
AND BUDGET IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRUTH IN TAXATION ACT
WHEREAS, the Truth in Taxation Law requires the City of St. Anthony provide
Hennepin and Ramsey Counties with a certified 2002 tax levy and budget;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the City Manager's proposed 2002 budget;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on December 11, 2001, 7:00 P.M. in
its Council Chambers to discuss the tax levy with the residents of St. Anthony;
and
WHEREAS, the information required for the City to calculate a definitive tax levy has beer
collected.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that:
1) The 2002 property tax levy is:
Property Tax Levy Limit $2,199,967
Road Improvement Levy $ 342,757
Tax Abatement Levy/Central Park $ 29,642
PERA Rate Increase Levy $ 7,500
$2,579,866
2) HRA Levy $_55,500
Total 2002 Tax Levy, $2,635,366
3) The 2002 Total Operating Budget totals$7,273,600
32
Page 2 -
Adopted this day of , 2001.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
33
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
NOTICE OF HEARING
TOTAL BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAXES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the St. Anthony City Council will hold a
public hearing on its budget and on the amount of property taxes it is proposing to
collect to pay for the costs of services the City will provide in 2002.
ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING
All St. Anthony residents are invited to attend the public hearing of the City
Council to express their opinion on the budget and on the amount of property
taxes the City proposes to collect in 2002. The hearing will be held on:
Tuesday, December I Ith, at 7:00 p.m.
St. Anthony City Hall/Council Chambers
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at
said time and place. You are also invited to send your written comments to the
City Manager. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the Finance
Director at 612-789-8881. Auxiliary aids are available upon request at least 96
hours in advance of the meeting.
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
December 5, 2001
34
GENERAL FUND " ..... ..
The General Fund accounts for
resources devoted to financing
general services. These include
General Government, Police, Fire,
Public Works and Parks. It is the
largest budget and is the main
operating fund of the City
2001 2002 Dollar
Budget Budget Decrease Percentage
$3,519,875 $3,626,500 $106,625 3.03%
2000 2002 Dollar
Levy Levy Increase Percentage
$1 ,763,475 $2,199,967* $4361492 24.75%
*State Legislature eliminated HACA aid to Cities with the
expectation that Cities would levy to recover their loss in
revenue. Created a significant increase in the Levy and Tax Rate.
35
GENERAL FUND
REVENUES 2001 2002
BUDGET BUDGET
Property Taxes $1,766,475 $2,210,467 $443,992 25.131.
Licenses $10,550 $10,000 ($550) -5.21`
Permits $99,500 $112,700 $13,200 13.27.
Intergovernmental Revenue $731,768 $352,165 ($379,603) -51.87`.
Contract Revenue(Lauderdale/Falcon Heights) $569,432 $590,380 $20,948 3.68`.
Charges for Service(Fines) $100,000 $105,000 $5,000 5.00`.
Miscellaneous Revenues $142,150 $145,788 $3,638 2.56`.
Transfers&Miscellaneous Revenues $100,000 $100,000 §-0 0.00`.
GENERAL FUND TOTAL REVENUES $3,519,875 $3,626,500 $106,625
Total%Increase in Revenues 3.03°
EXPENDITURES 2001 2002
BUDGET BUDGET
Mayor/City Council $53,000 $56,300 $3,300 6.23`.
Public/Intergovernmental Relations $19,500 $20,100 $600 3.08°
Cable Franchise $18,000 $19,900 $1,900 10.56`
General Management $93,000 $86,600 ($6,400) -6.88°
Elections $16,400 $24,400 $8,000 48.78°
Finance,Insurance/Accounting $212,400 $208,200 ($4,200) -1.98°
Finance,Assessing $36,500 $39,100 $2,600 7.12`.
Legal $58,400 $69,800 $11,400 19.52°
Engineering,Planning/Zoning $2,700 $2,500 ($200) -7.41
City Building $104,600 $112,500 $7,900 7.55`,
Civil Defense/Emergency Management $40,400 $43,700 $3,300 8.17`.
Police Protection $983,600 $1,061,200 $77,600 7.89`.
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights Contracts $491,200 $519,200 $28,000 5.7W
Fire Protection $527,975 $555,900 $27,925 5.29°
Inspections,Building/Plumbing/Heating/Health $69,800 $75,900 $6,100 8.74
Animal Control $3,400 $3,600 $200 5.8W
Public Works $367,800 $395,200 $27,400 7.45`
Public Works,Maintenance/Repair Equipment $103,700 $121,200 $17,500 16.88`.
Tree and Weed Care $25,400 $27,000 $1,600 6.30°
Parks $105,100 $109,200 $4,100 3.90`
Transfers to Other Funds $75,000 $75,000 $0 0.00`,
Budget Reserves $112,000 10 ($112,000) -100.00`
GENERAL FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,519,875 $3,626,500 $106,625
Total%Increase In.Expenses 3.031
4b 4b 4b
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Misc. Transfers
Fines 4.0% 2.8%
Contracts 2.9%
16.3%
r�
Intergov t -�
Y
Revenue Tax Levy
°
9.7 ° 60.9%
License &
Permits
3.4%
w
o�
4b 4b 4b
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
Transfers General Gov't
2.1 % 8.8% Finance &
Public Works Insurance
21 . 1 % 5.7%
Inspections
2. 1 %
Fire
16.5%
Police
Contracts 29.4%
14.3%
w
V
4b 4b .
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Fines Misc. Transfers
2.8% 4.0% 2.8%
Contracts
� r
16.3%
e :ai. ? !I'5'e�r._d,.� •ia.l.1 Tax Levy
50.2%
Intergov't Revenue
20.8% License & Permits
3.1%
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Misc. Transfers
Fines
2.9% 4.0% 2.8%
Contracts
16.3% it.••lA j`
p r;n 1 a:P 1 �L: dl-4 rlil•
Intergov t Revenue
9.7% Tax Levy
60.9%
License & Permits w
3.4% �OO� at
4 4b
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
General Gov't
Transfers Budget Reserves 8.5% Finance &
2.1% 3.2% Insurance
Public Works 6.0%
20.0% Inspections
2.0%
Fire
16.2% Police
Contracts 28.0%
14.0%
�oo
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
Transfers General Gov't
Public Works 2.1% 8.8%
21.1% Finance & Insurance
5.7%
�- - Inspections
2.1%
Fire
16.5%
Police
Contracts 29.4% W
14.3%
40
City Levy
General Fund Budget $2,199,967* (Levy Limit)
Road Improvements $ 3429757
Tax Abatement/Central Park $ 29,642
PERA Rate Increase Levy S 70-500
Total Levy $29579,866
City Tax Rate
2001 2002
Total Levy $290359664 $2,5799967
Less:
Fiscal Disparities 3230172 $ 340,x, `
Local Levy $197129492 $2,239,663
Divided by:
Tax Capacity $596479190 $495609054 ($190879136)**
Tax Rate 30.325% 49.117% 18.792%***
*Levy Unit includes HACA recovery of$349,289/State shifted to
fund education.
**State Legislature Changed Class Rates = (23.84% decrease).
***As part of tax reform, the State acknowledged that one of the
realities of the restructuring was that all Cities would experience an
increase in their tax rates.
41
City Portion
HENNEPIN COUNTY
2001 VALUATION = $137,000 *AVERAGE VALUATION
HENNEPIN COUNTY
2002 VALUATION = $163,000 *AVERAGE VALUATION
ZQOl
Tax Capacity 1767
X 30.325%
City Taxes $ 535.84
2002
Tax Capacity 1630
X 49,117%
City Taxes $ 800.61
INCREASE $ 264.77
Tax Relief:
Property Taxes in 2001 $2,441.34
Property Taxes in 2002
Decrease/Relief ($ 326.71)
42
City Portion
RAMSEY COUNTY
2001 VALUATION = $147,100 *AVERAGE VALUATION
RAMSEY COUNTY
2002 VALUATION = $167,900 *AVERAGE VALUATION
2001
Tax Capacity 1933
X 30.325%n
City Taxes $ 586.18
2002
Tax Capacity 1679
X 49.117%n
City Taxes $ 824.67
INCREASE $238.49.
Tax Relief_
Property Taxes in 2001 $29670.69
Property Taxes in 2002
Decrease/Relief ($ 492.49)
43
Where Does Property Tax Relief come from?
1) State took over the funding of K— 12 education.
Funding Sources:
➢ I3ACA Aid
➢ Property Tax line item for
Cabins & Commercial/Industrial
2) Previous the School District Levy was approximately 50% of
the total property taxes paid.
3) Currently, it represents 27% of the total taxes paid.
➢ Voter approved levies.
➢ Other local levies allowed by State.
Your Proposed Property Tax for 2002 44
This s is Not s Sill • D• Not Pay
The amount of property tax shown below is being proposed by your city or township,school district,county,and
metropolitan special taxing districts.
PIN: 81-910467
Property:
3800 SILVER LAKE RD
Taxable Market Value for 2001 Taxes: $381.600
Taxable Market Value for 2002 Taxes:
$381.600
Property Classification: • PERSONAL
Owner(s):
The market values above are final and are not a
subject for the upcoming budget hearings.They
were discussed with the County Assessor or
RONALD AND JUDITH RASMUSSEN reviewed at the County Board of Equalization
D B A TIRES PLUS hearings held earlier this year.The final taxable
3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD market values may reflect a reduction under the
C/O HRA OF ST.ANTHONY limited market value law.11 this property isa
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418-1699 qualifying homestead,the final taxable market
value for 2001 taxes may exclude improvements
you made to the property.
Effect of Proposed Local Budgets on Your Property Taxes
The table below shows the effect on your property taxes al: Your county commissioners,school board,city council(it your property is
-local government budget and spending decisions located in a city over 500 population),and metropolitan special taxing
-your property's change in market value districts are not required to hold public meetings in December of this year
Column(1)below shows your actual 2001 property taxes. to discuss their proposed 2002 budgets and proposed 2002 property
taxes. However,they may choose to hold meetings,in which case you
Column(2)below shows what your 2002 property taxes will be if your would receive published or posted notice of the meeting. The addresses
local jurisdictions approve the property tax amounts they are now and telephone numbers Of your local units of government are shown
below in case you have comments or questions concerning the proposed
considering.Any upcoming referendums,legal judgements,natural tax amounts shown an the notice. There is also not public hearing on the
disasters,and any special assessments could result in increaseing state general tax or on the town tax(if your property is located in a town).
these amounts.
The amounts shown below for other special taxing districts-such as
watershed districts-are the totals for all other special taxing districts
in which your property is located.No meeting is required for these districts.
(1) (2)
2001 Proposed 2002 �/
Property Tax Property Tax
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
$ 2,961.98
CITY OF ST ANTHONY 2, 6
608. 0 1
AT GENERAL AX 4 129.20
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0282
STATE DETERMINED LEVY:(eliminated for 2002) .00
VOTER APPROVED LEVIES: 1.310.65
OTHER LOCAL LEVIES: 462.75
METRO.SPEC.TAX DISTS.: 195.34
OTHER SPEC.TAXING DISTS: 124:91
TAX INCREMENT TAX: •00
FISCAL DISPARITY TAX: 2.458.57
Total $ 16,676..00 $ 14,252.00
Percent change(proposed 2002 total tax over 2001 total tax) 14.5-%
Budget Hearin s:Locations and Dates
RAMSEY COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE
ARLINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 15 WEST KELLOGG BLVD #250
1495 RICE STREET ST PAUL, MN 55102
ST PAUL, MN 55117 (651) 266-9040
DECEMBER 11, 2001 6:00 PM
CITY OF ST ANTHONY CITY OF ST ANTHONY
NO HEARING _REQUIRED IN 2001 3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD
ST ANTHONY, MN 55418
(612) 789-8881
SCHOOL DISTRICT 282 ISD 282
MEDIA CENTER - 1ST FLOOR 3303 33RD AVENUE NE
3303 33RD AVENUE NE ST ANTHONY, MN'55418
ST ANTHONY. MN 55418 (612) 706-1000
DECEMBER 18, 2001 6:30 PM
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
NO HEARING REQUIRED IN 2001 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MEARS PARK CENTRE 230 E 5TH ST
ST PAUL. MN 55101
(6511 5n2-15+
45
Comparison of Tax Relief:
Changes to Class Rates benefits affluent Communities. . .
Average decrease in Property Taxes. . .
Edina (29.5%)
Minntonka (28.2%)
Shorewood (25.7%)
St. Anthony (12.7%)
Brooklyn Park ( 9.8%)
Golden Valley ( 7.9%)
Hopkins ( 2.8%)
St. Louis Park ( 2.5%)
Spring Lake Park ( 1.2%)
Richfield 5.2% increase
Robbinsdale 5.2% increase
Minneapolis 3.8% increase
.46
Your Proposed Property Tax for 2Guz
Important information is printed on the back of this form.
Property ID NO: 06-029-2343 0066
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418-2517
2000 Taxable Market Value for 2001 taxes: 128,400 HOMESTEAD
2001 Taxable Market Value for 2002 taxes: 139,300 HOMESTEAD
The taxable market values for property tax payable in 2002 was sent to you in the spring of 2001.The period to discuss possib
changes has passed and changes can no longer be made to your property valuation. It is included here for your information only.
(1) (2)
Addresses for = Actual 2001 Proposed 2002 Percent
Correspondence Property Tax Property Tax of Changc
Total
Excluding Special Assessments $2, 065.36 $1,878.23 -9.1%
7 Hennepin County County of Hennepin $$16.75
A2400 Government Center
Minneapolis MN 55487
612-348-3011
City of ST. ANTHONY City of ST. ANTHONY $590.69
3301 Silver Lake Rd
St Anthony MN 55418
612-789-8881
State General Tax $0.00
School District 282 School District 282
ISD 282 State Mandated Levy (Eliminated for 2002) $0.00
3303 33rd Ave NE Voter Approved Levies $407.49
Minneapolis MN 55418 Other Local Levies _ $104.78
612-706-1000 School District Total $512.27
Metropolitan Council Metro- Special Taxing Districts:
230 Fifth St East (Metro Council,Metro Transit,Metro Mosquito Control) $42.72
St Paul MN 55101
651-602-1738
Other Special Taxing Districts: $89.32
(Park Museum, HRA, Parks, Watershed)
Fiscal Disparity Tax: $0.00
Tax Increment Finance: $0.00
Solid Waste Mgmt Fee: $26.48
This is Not a Bill - Do Not Pay
47
Your Proposed Property Tax for ACvu4
Important information is printed on the back of this form.
Property ID NO: 06-029-23 12 0020
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418-1715
2000 Taxable Market Value for 2001 taxes: 135,600 HOMESTEAD
2001 Taxable Market Value for 2002 taxes: 147, 100 HOMESTEAD
The taxable market values for property tax payable in 2002 was sent to you in the spring of 2001.The period to discuss possiblE
changes has passed and changes can no longer be made to your property valuation. It is included here for your information only.
(1) (2)
Addresses for Actual 2001 Proposed 2002 Percent
Correspondence Total Property Tax Property Tax of Change
Excluding Special Assessments $2,257.68 $1, 978.83 -12.4%
&Henne7e pin County County of Hennepin $058.23
A2400 Government Center
Minneapolis MN 55487
612-348-3011
City of ST. ANTHONY City of ST. ANTHONY $630.42
3301 Silver Lake Rd
St Anthony MN 55418
612-789-8881
State General Tax $0.00
School District 282 School District 282
ISD 282 State Mandated Levy (Eliminated for 2002) $0.00
3303 33rd Ave NE Voter Approved Levies $431.62
Minneapolis MN 55418 Other Local Levies $111.83
612-706-1000 School District Total $543.45
Metropolitan Council Metro Special Taxing Districts:
230 Fifth St East (Metro Council,Metro Transit,Metro Mosquito Control) $45.59
St Paul MN 55101
651-602-1738
Other Special Taxing Districts: $73.18
(Park Museum, HRA, Parks, Watershed)
Fiscal Disparity Tax: $0.00
Tax Increment Finance: $0.00
Solid Waste Mgmt Fee: $27.96
Check out the convenient payment options available to pay NEXT YEAR's property taxes at
http://www.co.hennepin.mn.us/taxsvcs/payopt/payopt.htm or call: 612-348-3011
— This is Not a Bill Do Not Pay
48
Your Proposed Property Tax for 2002
Important information is printed on the back of this form.
ANTHONY. D & JANICE A FERRARO Property ID NO: 06-029-23 21 0032
2000 Taxable Market Value for 2001 taxes: 154,100 HOMESTEAD
2001 Taxable Market Value for 2002 taxes: 167,200 HOMESTEAD
The taxable market values for property tax payable in 2002 was sent to you in the spring of 2001.The period to discuss possiblE
changes has passed and changes can no longer be made to your property valuation. It is included here for your information only.
(2)
Addresses for Actual 2001 Proposed 2002 Percent
Correspondence Total Property Tax Property Tax of Change
_
Ex cluding Special Assessments $2,692.30 $2,328.87 -13.5%
7 Hennepin County County of Hennepin $0769.71
A2400 Government Center !
Minneapolis MN 55487
612-348-3011
City of ST. ANTHONY City of ST. ANTHONY $737.19
3301 Silver Lake Rd
St Anthony MN 55418
612-789-8881
State General Tax $0.00
School District 282 School District 282
ISD 282 State Mandated Levy (Eliminated for 2002) $0.00
3303 33rd Ave NE Voter Approved Levies $494.64
Minneapolis MN 55418 Other Local Levies $130.77
612-706-1000 School District Total $625.41
Metropolitan Council Metro Special Taxing Districts:
230 Fifth St East (Metro Council,Metro Transit,Metro Mosquito Control) $53.31
St Paul MN 55101
651-602-1738
Other Special Taxing Districts: $111.47
(Park Museum, HRA, Parks, Watershed)
Fiscal Disparity Tax: $0.00
Tax Increment Finance: $0.00
Solid Waste Mgmt Fee: $31.78
This is Not a Bill - Do Not Pay
49
Your Proposed Property Tax for 2002
Important information is printed on the back of this form.
Property ID NO: 06-029-23 21 0154
MINNEAPOLIS MN
2000 Taxable Market Value for 2001 taxes: 187, 000 HOMESTEAD
2001 Taxable Market Value for 2002 taxes: 202, 900 HOMESTEAD
The taxable market values for property tax payable in 2002 was sent to you in the spring of 2001.The period to discuss possible
changes has passed and changes can no longer be made to your property valuation. It is included here for your information only
(1) (2)
Addresses for Actual 2001 Proposed 2002 Percent
Correspondence Total Property Tax Property Tax of Change
Excluding Special Assessments $3,495.22 . $2,905.53 -16.9%
ennepin County County of Hennepin $965.44
A2400 Government Center
Minneapolis MN 55487
612-348-3011
City of ST. ANTHONY City of ST. ANTHONY $924.65
3301 Silver Lake Rd
St Anthony MN 55418
612-789-8881
State General Tax $0.00
School District 282 School District 282
ISD 282 State Mandated Levy (Eliminated for 2002) $0.00
3303 33rd Ave NE Voter Approved Levies $606.15
Minneapolis MN 55418 Other Local Levies $164.03
612-706-1000 School District Total $770.18
Metropolitan Council Metro Special Taxing Districts:
230 Fifth St East (Metro Council,Metro Transit,Metro Mosquito Control) $66.87
St Paul MN 55101
651-602-1738
Other Special Taxing Districts: $139.82
(Park Museum, HRA, Parks, Watershed)
Fiscal Disparity Tax: $0.00
Tax Increment Finance: $0.00
Solid Waste Mgmt Fee: $38.57
This is Not a Bill - Do Not Pay N
50
Your Proposed Property Tax for 2 OG
• • • •
i Important information Is printed on the back of this form.
Property ID NO: -07-029-23 21 0013
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418-3227
2000 Taxable Market Value for 2001 taxes: 212,700 HOMESTEAD
2001 Taxable Market Value for 2002 taxes: 230,800 HOMESTEAD
The taxable market values for property tax payable in 2002 was sent to you in the spring of 2001.The period to discuss possibl
changes has passed and changes can no longer be made to your property valuation. It is included here for your information only.
Addresses for Actual 2001 Proposed 2002 Percent
Correspondence Property Tax Property Tax of Change
Total
Excluding Special Assessments $4,122.161 $3,376.171 -18.1%
Hennepin County County of Hennepin $1,x26.31
A2400 Government Center
Minneapolis MN 55487
612-348-3011
City of ST. ANTHONY City of ST. ANTHONY $1,078.72
3301 Silver Lake Rd
St Anthony MN 55418
612-789-8881
State General Tax $0.00
School District 282 School District 282
ISD 282 State Mandated Levy (Eliminated for 2002) $0.00
3303 33rd Ave NE Voter Approved Levies $694.78
Minneapolis MN 55418 Other Local Levies $191.36
612-706-1000 School District Total $886.14
Metropolitan Council Metro Special Taxing Districts:
230 Fifth St East (Metro Council,Metro Transit,Metro Mosquito Control) $78.01
St Paul MN 55101
651-602-1738
Other Special Taxing Districts: $163.11
(Park Museum, HRA, Parks, Watershed)
Fiscal Disparity Tax: $0.00
Tax Increment Finance: $0.00
Solid Waste Mgmt Fee: $43.88
Check out the convenient payment options available to pay NEXT YEAR's property taxes at
http://www.co.hennepin.mn.us/taxsvcs/payopt/payopt.htm or call: 612-348-3011
This is Not a Bill - Do Not Pay 7
51
iWHAT DO I GET FOR MY TAXES?
AVERAGE HOME VALUATION= $163,000
ANNUAL BUDGET TAXES= $684.52
ROAD LEVY TAXES= $105.68
TAX ABATEMENT.= $8.81
PERA RATE INCREASE $1.60
ESTIMATED ANNUAL TAXES = $800.61
EXPENDITURES BUDGET
2002 TAX LEVY %OF TAXES
BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET PAID
Mayor/Council $56,300.00 $50,002.00 2.27% $15.56
Public/Intergovemmental Relations $20,100.00 $17,852.00 0.81% $5.55
Cable Franchise $19,900.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00
General Management $86,600.00 $74,687.00 3.39% $23.24
Elections $24,400.00 $21,671.00 0.99% $6.74
Finance, Insurance/Accounting $208,200.00 $149,911.00 6.81% $46.64
Finance,Assessing $39,100.00 $34,726.00 1.58% $10.80
Legal $69,800.00 $13,992.00 0.64% $4.35
Engineering, Planning/Zoning $2,500.00 $2,220:00 0.10% $0.69
City Buildings $112,500.00 $99,916.00 _ 4.54% ` $31.09
Civil Defense $43,700.00 $38,812.00 1.76% $12.08
Police Protection $1,061,200.00 $636,240.00 28.92% $197.97
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights Contracts $519,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00
Fire Protection $555,900.00 $481,228.00 21.87% $149.73
Inspections, Building/Plumbing/Heating/Health $75,900.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00
Animal Control $3,600.00 $3,197.00 0.15% $0.99
Public Works $395,200.00 $280,294.00 12.74% $87.21
Public Works,Maintenance/Repair Equipment $121,200.00 $107,643.00 4.89% $33.49
Tree and Weed Care $27,000.00 $23,980.00 1.09% $7.46
Parks $109,200.00 $96,985.00 4.41% $30.18
Transfers to Other Funds $75,000.00 $66.611.00 3.03% $20.73
GENERAL FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3.626.500.00 $2.199.967.00 100.00% $684.52
ROAD LEVY $342,757.00 $105.68
TAX ABATEMENT $29,642.00 $8.81
PERA-RATE INCREASE LEVY $7,500.00 $1.60
TOTAL LEVY $2,579,866.00 $800.61
i
XII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 3,2001
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
Planning Commissioners
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR TIF DISTRICT
The following TIF Plan proposed by Jerry Gilligan of Dorsey& Whitney, allows the City to proceed
with the purchase of property to provide financial assistance to the following properties:
New to Plan Purchase and removal of Hardies property to Estimated cost: $360,000
prepare for redevelopment
New to Plan Purchase and removal of Exhaust Pro property Estimated cost: $500,000
to prepare for redevelopment
New to Plan Purchase and removal of Phillips 66 gas station Estimated cost: $500,006
property to prepare for redevelopment
In existing Plan Apache Plaza redevelopment to assist with Estimated cost: $200,000
consultants, etc.
TOTAL $1,560,000
Revenue to pay for redevelopment opportunity to come from Chandler District proceeds of
approximately$1.7 million. Other redevelopment opportunities that are currently in the Plan could be
paid from District if other revenue becomes available to City, such as profits from property sales (5 lots
on Kenzie- Custom Liquidators, etc.):
Southwest Quadrant area(Stonehouse, $1,125,000
Shopping Center area)
Twin City Federal lot $75,000
Purchase or provide assistance to KFC, $500,000
Broadway Pizza, Bremer Bank
Page 2
Since 1994, the City has assisted the following properties:
• Walgreens
• Custom Liquidators purchase
• Industrial Custom Products
• CUB Foods
• Several townhome projects
• 33'/Stinson
• Fordham
• Highway 88
• Kenzie Terrace
In excess of$10 million in new value has been created as a result of the assistance the City has
provided.
Other issues Springsted is exploring are:
1. Paying off the Community Center bonds earlier.
2. Borrowing funds from Kenzie to do above and paying back with Chandler.
3. Bonding to pay for above items.
•
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS
- _ December 5, 2001
111
r FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues
January 8 (11 Regular Appointment to Council vacancy
meeting of
2002)
Public hearing on TIF
Ord.,wireless telecommunication (3rd)
Housekeeping resolutions
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: November 2001
Expenditures: Mean Average
92%
11/30/2001 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Spent Budget
Mayor/Council $53,000.00 $53,113.86 -$113.86 100% 0%
Intergovernmental Relations $19,500.00 $15,350.00 $4,150.00 79% 21%
Cable Franshise $18,000.00 $14,846.93 $3,153.07 82% 18%
General Management $93,000.00 $99,590.95 -$6,590.95 107% -7%
Elections $16,400.00 $15,359.46 $1,040.54 940% 6%
Finance/Insurance $212,400.00 $191,060.35 $21,339.65 90% 10%
Finance/Assessing $36,500.00 $36;677.83 -$177.83 100 0/0 0%
Legal $58,400.00 $65,779.04 -$7,379.04 113% -13%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,700.00 $416.66 $2,283.34 15% 85%
City Buildings $104,600.00 $96,323.27 $8,276.73 92% 8%
Civil Defense $40,400.00 $35,389.96 $5,010.04 88% 12%
Police Protection $983,600.00 $903,526.96 $80,073.04 92% 8%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $491,200.00 $451,086.18 $40,113.82 92% 8%
Fire Protection $527,975.00 $450,797.05 $77,177.95 85% 15%
Inspections/Building Permits $69,800.00 $65,897.52 $3,902.48 94% 6%
Animal Control $3,400.00 $2,067.66 $1,332.34 61% 39%
Public Works $367,800.00 $335,832.09 $31,967.91 91% 9%
Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $103,700.00 $92,836.25 $10;863.75 90% 10%
Tree and Weed Care $25,400.00 $17,220.32 $8,179.68 68%. 32%
Parks $105,100.00 $104,714.59 $385.41 100% 0%
Transfers to other Funds $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $0.00 100% 0%
Budget Reserves $112,000.00 $0.00 $112,000.00 0% 100%
Total Expenditures $3,519,875.00 $3,122,886.93 $396,988.07 89% 11%
11/30/2001
Projeted
Revenues: Fundina Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $1,573,370.60
MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $935,008.45
DNR $4,000,000.00 $2,935,870.97
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Storm Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $509,556.32
Stone Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1.594.271.55
Total Project Budget $9,610,000.00 $8,398,077.89
Other Project Activity:
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75
Met Council $20,000.00 $5,000.00
Water Connection Fee-29th Avenue $26,800.00 $6,700.00
Stormwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $87,445.12
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
29th Avenue-Water Connection Fees $26,000.00 $13,100.00
Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 $27.534.87
Total Revenues $9,963,800.00 $8,853,873.90
11/30/2001
Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Dat
WSB-Engineering Services $339,751.20
Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $22,721.39
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water.Study $2,025.00
Purchase of Flood Homes $939,166.64
Pahl Avenue Ponding $107,438.69
Flood Relief Grant Program $61,489.79
Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master $17,371.44
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,031,949:10
2000 Street Improvement Project $2,620,955.82
2001 Street Improvement Project $1,567,812.88
2002 Street Improvement Project $15,880.39
Harding Street Holding Ponds, $685,636.01
Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1.521.134.99
Total Expenditures $8,936,289.33
Project Balance -$82,415.43
Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $100,763.27
EXPENDITURE REPORT 11130r2001
WSB: Flood Rellef.Grard Program: 2001 Street Improvement Project
Project Description: egg Project Description: Exeenditures Project Description:
Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennis/Penny Gaunt $10,000.00 WSB-Engineering Services $197,972.62
Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00 Uille Suburban Newspapers 538.75
Stosnwater Task Force $29,243.00 Thomas/Susan Hoban $400.00 Hags Concrete Works $1.400.00
Stonnwater Engineering $35,682.96 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00 Olson's Plumbing $221.90
Flood Problem Analysis $27,819.98 Castle Building&Remodefing-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Sandness Construction $4,650.00
MCES Gram Application $1,724.25 LN.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00 Bond Issuance 521',183.48 .
DNR/FEMA Grams $10,704.48 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 Park Construction S1.342.346.13
Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 SL Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00 Total 2001 Street Project $1,567,812.88
Park Design $152,929.10 RiteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00
lA Study $26,331.00 Pine Cane Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 2002 Street Improvement Project
Flood Grant-199&r1999120062001 527.510.00 Lamere Concrete-Flood Proofing Improvement $4,412.00 Project Description:
Total WSB $339,751.20 McCaren Designs,Inc. $703.99 WSB-Engineering Services $9,319.50
Mtnnehaha Falls Landscaping $5.587.50 Dorsey&Whitney $709.69
Barr Enghma hg: Twin Cities Glass Block-2521 W.Armour Terace SM. Pipe Services Corp. S5,851,ZQ
Project Description: Total Flood Relief Program $61,489.79 Toted 2002 Street Project $15,880.39
District s6 Watershed Study 52.709.35
Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Private Homes-DumpsteralSerNee Master
Project Description: Harding Street Holding Ponds
Dorsey&Whitney: Waste Management $391.65 Project Description: Excenditures
Project Description: Service Master $13,782.29 WSB-Engineering Services $99,902.26
Legal Services for Flocdi g Issues $17,911.16 Nancy Myhran $259.50 Bettendorf Rohrer $19,000.00
Legal Services-Corder u ion at Homes $1,930.00 Unda Gonier $198.00 Second Nature Lawn $226,168.92
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2,880,23 Susan Kozarek $925.00 Residential Easements $265,000.00
Taal Dorsey&Whitney $22,721.39 Elaine Nelson $1,085.00 Dorsey&Whf ney/Legal $29,906.47
Sue Wenken $250.00 STS Consultants $3,235.00
Water Quality Study: Berkley RisWlnsuance Claim-Payment S500,,QQ Evergreen Land Services $19,519.66
Silver Lake: Taal Dumpsters $17,371.44 Construction Bulliten $358.48
Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Albrecht,Inc. $20,215.22
Sump Pump Old Republic-Abstract Fees
Purchase of Horses: Project Descdpdw: Total Harding Street Holding Palls $685,636.01
Project Description: Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Une $131.00
Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement 5115.64 Silver Pant ParWConstruetlon
Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Total Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64 Project Description:
Demolition $9.156.60 Richard Knutson,Inc, $1,466,031.72
Taxes $839.61 1999 Street Improvement Project Sandness Construction $15,478.00
Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 Project Description: Muska Electric $29,442.17
Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $385.00 WSB-Engineering Services $173,887.02 Trillium Park 510.183.10
Saw&Cap Wag $1,450.00 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Taal Silver Point Park. $1,521,134.99
Purchase of 2713 St.Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Norlhdale Construction $834,979.40
Demolition $11,258.00 Treemendous $460.00
Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Dorsey&Whitney $2.911.55
Recording Deed/Taxes $2,508.98 Bond Issuance Expense 510.875.28
Title Insurance $946.00 Total 1999 Street Project $1,031,949.10
Seal&Cap Wall $1,420.00
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 2000 Street Improvement Project
Purchase of 27002704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45 Project Description:
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $208,072.00 WSB-Engineering Services $298.231.43
First American Tide $375.00 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc. $2,096,52225
Evergreen Land Services 53.369.47 E-CEL Energy $155,100.00
Total Purchase of Homes $939,166.64 Buchan Environmental Services $2,248.99
Berkley Risk Services $10,000.00
Pahl Avenue Panding: AllState Insurance Company $312.78
Project Description: SL Paul Companies $16,884.96
WSB-Engineering Services $20,967,16 Ullie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93
G&L Construction 586,498.54 Albrecht,Inc. $891.75
Treemendous $14,460.90 Fabyanske&Westra-Legal Cost/Utlgali n $1,387.50
Pipe Services 53,859.20 Bond Issuance Expense + S39.143.23
Construction Bulletin $1,432.20 Total 2000 Street Project $2,620,955.82
Ullle Suburban News-Advertisement $220.69
Taal Paid Avenue Ponding $107,438.69
•
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
•
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
December 11, 2001
Page(s)
I. Call to Order.
II. Roll Call.
III. Approval of December 11, 2001 H.R.A. Agenda.
IV. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by
® one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these
items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which
event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve November 13, 2001 H.R.A. Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
B. Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
C. HRA Resolution 01-008, re: Designate a Chair for
theHRA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
D. HRA Resolution 01-009, re: Designate a Commissioner
forthe HRA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
V. General Policy Business of the H.R.A.
VI. Staff Reports.
VII. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments.
VIII. Information and Announcements.
IX. Adjournment.
•
IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
A. H.R.A. Minutes - November 13, 2001
B. Claims
C. HRA Resolution 01-008
D. HRA Resolution 01-009
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
• 2 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
3 NOVEMBER 13, 2001
4 I. CALL TO ORDER.
5 Chair Horst called the meeting to order at 9:02 p.m.
6 II. ROLL CALL.
7 Commissioners present: Chair Horst; Commissioners Sparks, and Thuesen.
8 Commissioners absent: None.
9 Also present: Executive Director Michael Morrison and City Attorney Jerry
10 Gilligan.
11 III. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 13,2001 H.R.A. AGENDA.
12 Motion by Commissioner Sparks to approve the November 13, 2001 Housing and
13 Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
14 Motion carried unanimously.
15 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
16 Motion by Commissioner Thuesen to approve the Consent Agenda, which consisted of:
17 A. H.R.A. Meeting Minutes of October 23. 2001: and
018 B. Claims.
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20 V. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
21 None.
22 VI. STAFF REPORTS.
23 Executive Director Morrison suggested that the Commissioners give some thought to what they
24 would like to see happen to the TIF budget. He added that just because it is.in there, does not
25 mean that they have to approve it. Morrison added that one of the things they want to examine is
26 the Hardees property that is for sale.
27 VII. H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
28 None.
29 VIII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
30 None.
31 IX. ADJOURNMENT.
32 Motion by Commissioner Thuesen to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
33 Motion carried unanimously.
• 34 Respectfully submitted,
35 Courtney Seesz
36 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
2
• Following are the verified claims for the December 11, 2001 (HRA)
1. Belair Builders, Inc...................................................$4,952.70
Demolition/Custom Liquidators
2. Crown Fence & Wire Company................................$1,100.00
Safety Fence/Custom Liquidators
3. Dahlgren, Shardlow &Uban.....................................$5,733.98
N/W Quadrant - Apache Master Plan
4. Ehlers & Associates, Inc...........................................$3,450.00
N/W Quadrant Study
5. Ehlers & Associates, Inc...........................................$1,875.00
S/W Quadrant Management Study
•
3
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
H.R.A. RESOLUTION 01-008
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A CHAIR FOR THE
ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED that Randy Hodson is hereby designated as Chair of the City of St. Anthony
Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
• Adopted this day of , 2001.
Chair
Reviewed for Administration:
Executive Director
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
H.R.A. RESOLUTION 01-009
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A COMMISSIONER FOR THE
ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED that Jerry Faust is hereby designated as a Commissioner of the City of St. Anthony
Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
® Adopted this day of 92001.
Chair
Reviewed for Administration:
Executive Director
•