HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 11122002 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
102978
Box: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 11122002
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
5:35 pm
City Hall
I. Call to Order
• II. Roll Call.
III. Update on Northwest Quadrant project.
IV. Other Business.
V. Adjournment.
SANDWICHES WILL BE PROVIDED
• : . EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
O To: Mike Morrison, St.Anthony Village
From: Jim Prosser, Ehlers & Associates
W Date: November 5,2002
Subject: Pratt-Ordway Development
Pratt-Ordway will be presenting development options for the Apache Redevelopment area to
the City Council. The purpose of this presentation is to determine if the development
program (i.e. the type and density of uses) will achieve redevelopment objectives acceptable
to.the City. It is important to emphasize that the options presented should not be considered
in final form. If acceptable to the Council the concepts would be refined by Pratt—Ordway.
The next steps would include the following:
• The development program(s)will be placed in context of a site plan by Pratt-Ordway
architect.
• The draft site plan(s) would be reviewed by the Northwest Quadrant Task Force.
is The feedback from the Task Force would be used to refine the site plan and develop
supplemental materials for public presentations. This meeting is tentatively scheduled
for Thursday, December 12, 2002 at 7:00pm.
• The refined site plan would be presented to the public at an open house for additional
feedback. The feedback would be used to further refine the site plan. This meeting
tentatively scheduled for Thursday, January 16, 2003 at 7:00pm.
• The final development plan and an outline of Development Agreement issues would
be presented to the City Council for conceptual review.
• If acceptable, a final development agreement would be prepared for consideration by
the Council. This agreement would not grant any land use approvals.
❑ After approval of development agreement the land use approval process would be
initiated. The Planning Commission would consider the proposed site plan in the
same manner as other land use requests.
❑ It is likely that the development agreement will include the need to establish a new
tax increment district. Establishing this district will permit, but not require, the City
to provide assistance to the developer.
The concepts presented by the developer at this time are still "work in progress". There are a
• number of steps that will be taken to refine the plan for this area before the plan will be
presented for formal consideration.
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
I
3060 Centre Pointe Drive Phone: 651-697-8503 Fax_:___6__5_1-_6---9-7- 8555
Roseville, MN 55113-1105 Email: jim@ehlers-inc.com
• Several factors to be considered during the evaluation of this proposed development program
include:
1. Because of the project size and costs it is recommended and anticipated that the
project would be "phased".
2. The developer was encouraged to prepare an option for the first phase that would not
require significant financial assistance in addition to tax increment. This would
increase the probability of the project being constructed.
3. A major emphasis has been placed on developing a concept that is market and
financially feasible. There have been some changes in the general development
market place since the initial developer selection. Those changes include some
improvement in the retail marketplace. This would enable the developer to increase
the amount of retail space under limited circumstances. Increased retail capacity for
this site substantially improves the financial feasibility of the project. To capture the
increased market capacity it will be necessary to attract a major retail anchor(80,000
s.f.+) to the site. According to retail experts, the retail anchor would attract additional
smaller retail tenants.
4. Without an additional major retail tenant, the total retail space is likely to be limited
to 50,000 s.f. or less. With a major retail tenant the total space could increase to
• 200,000 s.f. This change would increase the financial feasibility of the project
because of higher land payments for the retail space.
5. It is important to note that the proposed'concepts prepared by the developer are
different than the initial concepts reviewed during the planning process and at
developer selection. This is an expected outcome during the pre-development
planning phase. These differences are the result of changes in market, financial and
planning considerations. The initial planning process anticipated that there would be
changes during the development process and provided that the initial concept should
be considered a framework for the final plan and not the final plan.
6. The proposed development program prepared by Pratt-Ordway is consistent with the
initial framework accepted by the City. The financial information presented by the
developer would indicate that phase one of the project could be developed without
the need for assistance in addition to tax increment.
7. Obviously, no commitment to provide tax increment has been made to the developer
at this time. However, it is likely that some assistance would be needed. If the City
does elect to provide assistance it is recommended that the developer be permitted to
use all or a portion of the increment to pay for the public improvements required for
the development. This could be accomplished by assessing the developer for the
public improvement cost. This would increase the "efficiency" of the tax increment
by reducing the effective interest rate for the increment revenues.
• 8. The second phase of the.proposed development would require assistance beyond tax
increment. It is more likely that this additional assistance would be available if the
Ehlers &Associates— November 6, 2002
• first phase is under development. However, there are some disadvantages to this
approach. The major concern is that the acquisition cost of phase 2 properties may
escalate due to the combination of enhanced public improvements and anticipated
market demand for these properties.
9. Because of these concerns, the developer should be encouraged to acquire as much
property as financially feasible during the initial phase of this project. It is likely that
the developer will need assistance in land assembly. This will include the potential
need to use the City's eminent domain authority under special circumstances.
10. If the development is phased, the proposed public improvements installed as part of
the development will benefit the remaining commercial properties adjoining this site.
Consideration should be given to assessing these properties for a portion of the cost
of the improvements.
•
Ehlers & Associates— November 6, 2002
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community,
a walkable village, which is safe and secure.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
November 12, 2002
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the Following Items:
I. Approval of November 12, 2002 City Council Meeting Agenda. Action
requested..
II. Proclamations and Recognitions.
Ill. Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the
regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name
and address for the Clerk's record and limit their remarks to five minutes.
Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this
time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the
matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IV. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will
be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so
requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Consider October 22, 2002 Council meeting minutes. (pp. 1 - 15)
B. Consider licenses and permits. (p. 16)
C. Consider payment of claims. (pp. 17 - 21)
D. Resolution 02-069, re: Approve submittal of 2003 Ramsey County SCORE
Funding Grant Application/Program. (pp. 22 - 29)
E. Resolution 02-070, re: Approve 2003 salary of St. Anthony City Manager.
(p. 30)
Page 2
V. Public Hearings - None.
VI. Reports From Commissions and Staff.
A. Update on sewer/water study. Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, will be
present. (pp. 31 - 35)
B. Ordinance 2002-006, re: Water rate increase (1s' reading). Action
requested. (pp. 36 - 44)
VII. General Policy Business of the Council.
A. Ordinance 2002-007, re: Amend ordinance on fee schedule. Action
requested. (pp. 45 - 61)
VIII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers.
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Miscellaneous Informational Documents.
XI. Adjournment.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes i
October 22, 2002
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 October 22, 2002
6
7 CALL TO ORDER
8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
9
10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust.
15 Absent: None.
16 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson and City Attorney Jerry Gilligan.
17
18 CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 I. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 22, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
22 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the City Council Meeting Agenda of October 22,
23 2002.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
28 None.
29
30 III. COMMUNITY FORUM.
31 Mayor Hodson invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items
32 that are not on the regular agenda.
33
34 Hearing none,Mayor Hodson moved forward with the agenda.
35
36 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
37 A. Consider October 8, 2002 Council meeting minutes.
38 B. Consider licenses and permits.
39 C. Consider payment of claims.
40
41 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to approve the Consent Agenda items.
42
43 Motion carried unanimously.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 2
October 22, 2002
Page 2
1 V. FORUM ON LIQUOR REFERENDUM.
2 Mayor Hodson provided a presentation on the upcoming liquor referendum, noting that on
3 November 5th several questions will be posed regarding on-sale liquor in St. Anthony. He
4 explained that if approved, it would allow family restaurants to have on-sale liquor. He noted the
5 current restaurants do not have an ability to sell wine or beer with a meal. He explained that in
6 meetings with developers, Mr. Mornson has been asked about this option. Currently the City
7 does not have the ability to issue on-sale, consumption on-site, liquor licenses. State law requires
8 voters authorize the liquor licensing authority to the City. The referendum will ask the residents
9 to vote on this issue in two questions as follows:
10
11 "Shall the City of St. Anthony be authorized to issue on-sale liquor licenses to hotels and
12 restaurants as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.601?" and
13 "Shall the City of St. Anthony be authorized to issue Sunday on-sale liquor licenses as provided
14 in Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.504?"
15
16 Mayor Hodson stated that St. Anthony is currently one of two cities that do not have the authority
17 to issue on-sale liquor licenses. If approved, St. Anthony would have the ability to issue up to six
18 on-sale and Sunday on-sale liquor licenses but most likely less than that would be issued. The
19 City would also have the ability to define those guidelines and establish the regulations that
20 would be enforced and criteria used for these establishments.
21
22 Mayor Hodson reviewed the types of family restaurants that St. Anthony would be looking for
23 and stated he has received numerous resident requests for more unique restaurants. He stated he
24 believes the market will supply the demand as well as the demographics as the Northwest
25 Quadrant takes shape.
26
27 Mayor Hodson explained that if the referendum passes, it provides the City with an additional
28 option to operate at the Stonehouse Restaurant and Bar and in the dining community. He stated
29 the City may not.necessarily issue six liquor licenses but would have that ability as well as the
30 ability to look at the types of restaurants coming into St. Anthony. Currently without the ability
31 to issue an on-sale liquor license, the City does not have the ability to negotiate with that type of
32 restaurant.
33
34 Mayor Hodson stated these two questions will be on the ballot and a simple majority is all that is
35 needed to pass. He encouraged anyone who does not know of their polling location to call the
36 City Hall.
37
38 Mayor Hodson asked if there were any questions from the audience members.
39
40 An audience member asked if a no vote is counted. Mayor Hodson stated a simple majority of
41 the ballots cast is needed.
42
43 An audience member asked the-name of the other city that does not have on-sale liquor.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 22, 2002
Page 3
1 Mike Larson, Liquor Operations Manager, responded that the City of Wayzata has split liquor
2 and is the remaining municipality in the on-sale business in the metro area.
3
4 Councilmember Thuesen encouraged any residents viewing from home to call the City Hall if
5 they have questions regarding this item.
6
7 Mayor Hodson stated he has received only four telephone calls regarding the types of restaurants
8 or establishment coming into St. Anthony with specific concern about chain restaurants. He
9 stated currently the City has no options available to issue such a license until it is voted on and
10 approved.
11
12 Mayor Hodson asked if anyone would like to make comment. Hearing none, he moved on with
13 the agenda.
14
15 VI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
16 A. Planning Commission Report—October 15, 2002.
17
18 Planning Commissioner Steeves introduced himself and stated he would like to report on the
19 Planning Commission action from their last meeting. He stated they discussed the request to
20 consider an ordinance related to second hand goods dealers and the intent is to appoint a small
21 committee at the next Planning Commission meeting to start looking at that issue.
22
23 1. Resolution 02-068,Building height and side yard variance request for Business
24 Data Record Services/Belair Excavation, 3015 —37th Avenue NE.
25
26 Mr. Steeves explained that Business Data Record Services has submitted demolition and
27 expansion plans at 3015 — 37th Avenue Northeast. He noted they currently operate on
28 this site and would, under their proposal, demolish four existing buildings and construct a
29 new 40,000 square foot building. Mr. Steeves used a site plan to point out the location of
30 the proposed building. He noted the setback from Macalaster Drive is proposed to be five
31 feet. He also noted the Code requirement for a 35 foot setback. Thus a 30 foot setback
32 from Macalaster Drive is being requested.
33
34 Mr. Steeves stated they also proposed to add a stormwater detention pond at the northeast
35 end of the site which would be an added feature. He noted the configuration of the site
36 and truck route. He stated ample parking is proposed for this use.
37
38 Mr. Steeves presented a cross section from County Road D (37th Avenue), noting the
39 location of the existing warehouses and new warehouse being proposed. He pointed out
40 the line of the permitted 35 foot maximum height and proposed 44 foot in height. Thus
41 the request for a nine foot height variance. Mr. Steeves then pointed out the downward
42 slope of the site, noting it would appear the building is not as high from County Road D.
43
44 Mr. Steeves stated Business Data Record Services constructed a similar building in New
45 Brighton and the use of the facility is to store documents. This business rents out space
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 22, 2002
Page 4
1 by the cubic foot. This facility would store thousands of bankers boxes filled with
2 important documents their clients need to retain. The boxes are stacked on pallets,
3 palletized, and loaded with forklifts onto high racks. He stated currently the owners of
4 this company own the entire site and have several other sister companies that would be
5 moved to other locations. Then they would demolish those buildings to construct this
6 new 40,000 square foot building.
7
8 Mr. Steeves stated the applicants have been forthright, open, and cooperative. He stated
9 that no one on the Planning Commission wants to discourage business in St. Anthony or
10 this applicant from attempting to utilize this site to its fullest capacity. However, in
11 reviewing the application, the Planning Commission found it difficult, given the size and
12 construction of the building, to find that it met the requirements for a variance as set forth
13 in the City's Code. In order to consider a variance, the following findings must be met:
14 1) The property cannot be put to a reasonable use without the variance; 2) The
15 circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the owner; 3) The variance, if
16 granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and, 4) Economic
17 considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship.
18
19 Mr. Steeves stated that for the majority of the Planning Commissioners, it was felt the
20 applicant wanted to build the maximum sized building. However, they could construct a
21 building that meets the Code, though it may not be as cost effective. He noted they could
22 set the building back and lose about 7,000 square feet, drop the roof line to the allowable
23 height, and have a smaller sized building that could be used for the same purpose of
24 storage. Due to that, it was difficult for the Planning Commission to find that a variance
25 should be considered.
26
27 Mr. Steeves stated the applicant raised the issue of constraint due to the proximity of the
28 rail line and an Xcel utility easement through the site. He noted the location of the utility
29 easement and stated that would have minimal impact to construction as proposed. He
30 stated that easement has been mitigated quite well with the building shifted somewhat to
31 accommodate the full turning radius. However, the setback issue is on the Macalaster
32 Drive side,not the north side.
33
34 Mr. Steeves stated the railroad easement does not seem to greatly effect the location of
35 the building and has been accommodated reasonably well. He stated the stormwater
36 retention pond is required by the Rice Creek Watershed District and is also
37 accommodated.
38
39 Mr. Steeves stated that considering these issues, the Planning Commission did not find
40 the rationale met to consider granting a variance.
41
42 Councilmember Faust asked if the applicant indicated why the height variance was being
43 requested. Mr. Steeves stated the building height is partly driven by what is inside, large
44 racks that hold pallets.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 22, 2002
Page 5
1 Councilmember Faust asked if it is an industry standard for height. Mr. Steeves stated the
2 height request was made due to how the material is stored.
3
4 Councilmember Faust asked if the Fire Department indicated concern. Mr. Steeves stated
5 they made no comment.
6
7 Councilmember Faust asked if they have exceeded lot coverage. Mr. Steeves stated that
8 was not addressed by staff.
9
10 Councilmember Faust asked about the sister companies on this site. Mr. Steeves stated
11 he does not know that information.
12
13 Councilmember Faust asked if there were neighborhood comments. Mr. Steeves stated
14 there were none.
15
16 Councilmember Horst asked how it was determined that the stormwater pond was
17 needed. Mr. Steeves stated the applicant informed the Planning Commission that the
18 Rice Creek Watershed District is making that requirement.
19
20 Mayor Hodson noted it was a 3-2 vote to recommend denial with two Commissioners
21 being absent. Mr. Steeves stated that is correct.
22
23 Councilmember Sparks asked Mr. Steeves to again read the variance requirements. Mr.
24 Steeves complied by reading them.
25
26 Mr. Steeves stated the Planning Commission was divided in its recommendation but the
27 majority felt the plan was being driven by the applicant's desire to have a large building
28 on the site to accommodate their business needs.
29
30 An unidentified resident asked what this building will cost the individual taxpayer and if
31 it will benefit St. Anthony residents. She also asked why the City is not getting
32 reimbursement from the company.
33
34 Mr. Steeves explained that this is an entirely privately funded project and the applicant is
35 requesting no public assistance.
36
37 Mayor Hodson asked about the increase in tax base as a result of this new building.
38
39 City Manager Mornson explained that in almost all cases with a building like this the City
40 is a winner from an expenditure point since the project will not cost the City anything and
41 will gain tax base. He noted the public services required for this type of business is very
42 low.
43
44 Mark Murlowski, Chief Executive with Belair Excavating, thanked the Mayor and
45 Council for this opportunity to present their application. He explained that Berger
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 6
October 22, 2002
Page 6
1 Transfer constructed the first building on this site in 1959. He stated Berger Transfer is
2 over 90 years old, was established in 1910, and has become the largest Allied Transport
3 company in the United States. He reviewed their contribution to City events on a regular
4 basis, to parades, festivals, the fire department, and engineering department by providing
5 storage space at no charge. He stated Berger Transfer was named Business of the Year
6 for the City of St. Anthony several years ago.
7
8 Mr. Murlowski stated he has been working with Berger Transfer for over 25 years and
9 before that his father did. He stated that he is proud to be associated with Berger Transfer
10 and that this project requests no City assistance or TIF. It will be privately funded and is
11 a large job. He stated that each year Belair Excavating is involved with only 10 to 15
12 projects larger than this throughout the United States. He noted that within the current
13 economy, they are thankful to have Berger Transfer as a customer. He stated he
14 appreciates the question of the audience member about public assistance and assured
15 everyone that the project will be privately funded and nothing will be asked except for the
16 two variances.
17
18 Mr. Murlowski stated they are asking for relief from Code requirements they feel are
19 restrictive based on restriction that the land provides. He stated they are disappointed that
20 things did not go their way with the Planning Commission and will try to do a better job
21 tonight to explain reasonable use.
22
23 Mr. Murlowski stated the evidence discussed previously was proven, besides the
24 reasonable use item, and they are prepared to address that issue tonight. He stated the
25 most important thing he can talk about is that in today's business climate, businesses
26 cannot operate on the status quo because the world changed in 2000 and 2001 and
27 business intelligence needs to rise above that level. He stated if this is not built as a high-
28 pile storage business, he will guarantee the building will not be constructed and Berger
29 Transfer will remain unable to attract new customers or maintain the existing customer
30 base without this type of new construction. He stated a good example of the proposed
31 building is at 200 Old Highway 8 in New Brighton which was built about two years ago
32 as an addition to an older lower ceiling height building. He stated the New Brighton
33 building is 56,000 square feet and this proposed building would be 40,000 square feet.
34
35 Mr. Murlowski presented colored pictures of the New Brighton building, noting the
36 pleasing aesthetics by breaking up the wall panels.
37
38 Councilmember Sparks inquired regarding the relationship between Belair Excavating
39 and Berger Transfer. Mr. Murlowski stated Belair Excavating is the contractor for Berger
40 Transfer. He explained that BDRS has been in business for about 20 years and is a
41 business unit of Berger Transfer that supplies record transfer.
42
43 Councilmember Horst asked if the applicant is using an economic basis to say the
44 building will not be constructed unless at this size and height. Mr. Murlowski stated it is
45 somewhat driven by economics. However, architecturally for height and aisle widths, if
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 22, 2002
Page 7
1 they don't get enough square footage, the building is not feasible. He stated this is a free
2 standing, clear span structure and if the ceiling height is lowered, it will loose one full
3 pallet height without question.
4
5 Jim White, JRP Architects representing the applicant, stated his firm was involved to
6 develop the site in New Brighton and has some history with Berger Transfer. He
7 explained that the New Brighton and electronic storage facilities are due too reach
8 capacity within 12 to 18 months. Thence the application to accommodate its increased
9 business. He explained that the cost to construct a building that is more square and tall is
10 lower than a building that is lower and more spread out. He stated that is one of the
11 economics and the optimum is 65 feet in increments.
12
13 Mr. White reviewed the boundaries of the existing site and noted Macalaster Drive is a
14 dead end street which ends in the location of the fence. The nearest residential structure
15 is an apartment building to the east. The project will sprinkle three existing buildings.
16 BDRS has been gradually improving the appearance and safety features of this site and
17 this project will continue that program by removing the four 40-year old buildings and
18 constructing a new structure of maintenance free materials that is sprinkled. The four
19 buildings to be removed are also not ADA compliant.
20
21 Mr. White stated since the Planning Commission meeting they have tweaked the site plan
22 to accommodate better utilization of the site and address some of the issues the Planning
23 Commission had raised. He stated the building will be of pre-cast concrete material
24 similar to the building in New Brighton. It will exceed the height restriction by nine feet
25 and be located in line with the existing electronic media storage building. With a five
26 foot setback there is no issue with snow storage and the Fire Marshal has indicated no
27 objections to the proposed building location or height. The placement accommodates the
28 utility easement and the retention pond being required by the Rice Creek Watershed
29 District. That pond would be located in an unbuildable corner location of the site.
30
31 Mr. White stated the site cross section illustrates the building will be about six or seven
32 feet taller than the highest building as measured from County Road D and would be
33 approximately the same height as the bridge where Silver Lake Road crosses over the
34 railroad tracks.
35
36 Mr. White asked the Council to take note that the City Engineer and Fire Marshal have
37 reviewed their application and voiced no objection. He stated this building will allow
38 BDRS to meet their clients' ever expanding business needs and increase the property tax
39 base by providing a more appealing looking building of maintenance free materials,
40 reduced fire risk, lower traffic congestion than currently exists, and improve the site
41 characteristics.
42
43 Councilmember Faust asked what changed when they "tweaked" of the site plan. Mr.
44 White noted that previously they did not indicate clearly the easement placement, where
45 trucks may be parked at the truck docks, truck turning radius, and need for trucks to park
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes S
October 22, 2002
Page 8
1 to serve the new facility. He stated they did not change the building size or location,just
2 the use of the area surrounding the building.
3
4 Councilmember Horst asked if the justification for the building placement is to create the
5 turning radius needed for trucks. Mr. White stated that is correct.
6
7 Mr. Murlowski stated it is causing them to push the overhead doors more to the east
8 within the setback area. He noted that this land is irregular in shape and very difficult for
9 construction which pushes the building towards the substation access.
10
11 Mr. White stated another point is that the existing buildings on the site are used for the
12 same purpose. He clarified the other buildings are used for storage, but not for document
13 storage.
14
15 Councilmember Thuesen stated when the Planning Commission receives the request,
16 their consideration needs to be more than whether you want it or not. He stated that
17 normally when receiving Planning Commission recommendations, he agrees with it and
18 believes it has been very well thought out. However, in this case he is questioning it. He
19 stated that to him it appears the land cannot be put to a reasonable use that meets their
20 criteria without the variances being granted. He stated he believes the circumstance was
21 not created by the owner and if granted would not alter the essential character. He noted
22 that if anything, the character will be improved through the holding pond, nicer aesthetics
23 of the building,removal of the 40-year old buildings, and reducing the level of traffic. He
24 stated that the economic considerations may need a harder look but it does not appear to
25 him that it is solely economics. He noted that ADA compliance is another improvement
26 and this is only six to seven feet higher in a dead-end industrial area that is not out of
27 character with the appearance of the area. He stated he thinks the City would benefit if
28 this application is approved.
29
30 Councilmember Thuesen stated St. Anthony is looking to work with business and keep
31 good businesses so if the City Attorney has no problem, he thinks this holds a lot of
32 potential.
33
34 Councilmember Horst stated he spent six years on the Planning Commission and knows
35 that with any variance request, you do not have luxury of an elected official; you were
36 allowed a set of criteria and your determination is whether the application meets or does
37 not meet that criteria. You do not have the ability to determine whether it is a good or
38 bad project,just whether it meets the City's criteria. Councilmember Horst stated it is a
39 difficult situation with this type of building to find that all of the criteria that are needed
40 for a variance are met. He stated the Planning Commission did the right thing in
41 recommending denial. However, as public officials and being responsible to the voters,
42 the City Council has the ability and duty to try to work with businesses, especially an
43 exemplary business like Berger Transfer who has worked with St. Anthony for many
44 years.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 9
October 22, 2002
Page 9
1 Councilmember Horst stated it is not unprecedented that the Planning Commission may
2 be reversed and he thinks in this case it is warranted. He stated it is more beneficial to the
3 City to have this project than it is to stick with the letter of the law, which is what the
4 Planning Commission is required to do. Councilmember Horst commended the Planning
5 Commission for their work and stated he thinks the Council needs to look beyond that
6 and at what is good for business.
7
8 City Attorney Gilligan explained that undue hardship is required by the Code and that is a
9 difficult standard to apply in some cases. He stated that in what he saw from the
10 testimony, the NSP utility easement pushes back the building, required parking, and truck
11 movement, and the diagonal railroad easement also pushes the building towards
12 Macalaster Drive. He stated those are circumstances that can be cited for an undue
13 hardship.
14
15 Councilmember Faust stated that he also served on the Planning Commission and realizes
16 that is a difficult position to be in. He stated the Planning Commission did the right thing
17 to make a recommendation so it can be considered by the Council. He stated that when
18 he looks at the application conditions he thinks the uniqueness of the property and
19 surrounding areas makes it unique in that only certain uses can be made of this property.
20 He stated he thinks this project will make the neighborhood better and is the compelling
21 reason for him to consider granting the variance. He stated he appreciates that they are
22 good neighbors, but that is not a consideration under this application.
23
24 Councilmember Faust stated that he does not want the Planning Commission to take that
25 as a vote of no confidence, should the variances be approved. He stated he would vote in
26 favor of the variance.
27
28 Councilmember Horst stated Berger Transfer made compelling arguments to satisfy some
29 of the criteria and should that have been done before the Planning Commission it may
30 have been easier for them during their deliberations.
31
32 Councilmember Sparks indicated she has nothing to add to what has already been stated.
33
34 Mayor Hodson explained that for the last three years St. Anthony has been involved with
35 being a smart growth livable community and the City is rethinking all development in St.
36 Anthony in the spirit of smart growth and livable community standards. Mayor Hodson
37 stated that considering the circumstances with the lot size and density request, he would
38 support this application. He noted that to do otherwise may be questioned by the
39 Metropolitan Council.
40
41 Mayor Hodson reviewed language that would approve the two variance requests.
42
43 City Attorney Gilligan stated the draft resolution can be amended to include those criteria.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 10
October 22, 2002
Page 10
1 Motion by Councilmember Faust to adopt Resolution 02-068, Approving Building Height
2 and Side Yard Variances for Business Data Record ServicesBelair Excavation, 3015—
3 37th Avenue NE.,based on the following rationale:
4
5 "The City Council having due consideration for the recommendation of the Planning
6 Commission has reviewed the variance requests and believes that the utility and railroad
7 easement over the property and the new water retention pond required to be located on
8 the property in connection with the construction of the proposed building present an
9 undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property not created by the
10 owners of the property and the variances if granted will not alter the essential character of
11 the City."
12
13 Councilmember Horst asked if the draft resolution will be renamed or a new resolution be
14 drafted. City Attorney Gilligan stated the resolution will be redrafted with this new
15 language and citing a hardship finding.
16
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18
19 Mr. White thanked the Planning Commission for their assistance and stated they were
20 very good to work with.
21
22 B. Engineering Project Update—Todd Hubmer, WSB &Associates.
23 Mayor Horst welcomed Todd Hubmer, WSB &Associates, to the meeting.
24
25 Mr. Hubmer addressed the Council and provided an update on six engineering issues as follows:
26
27 Wellhead Protection Plan. Mr. Hubmer noted the meeting packet contains a number of figures
28 that the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District(SWCD)has completed for the
29 City of St. Anthony for ground water modeling. He has reviewed that information with them and
30 will be meeting with the Minnesota Department of Health at the end of the month to discuss
31 those results and to define the Wellhead Protection limits within St. Anthony. That information
32 will be presented to the City Council once completed.
33
34 Water and Sewer Study. Mr. Hubmer stated they have completed the St. Anthony Water Needs
35 and Sanitary Sewer Studies. He stated this Study has been provided for the Council's review and
36 included a summary of the information used to evaluate the water and sewer needs. Mr. Hubmer
37 noted the list of recommended improvements and implementation dates, and displayed a chart
38 contained in the Study identifying population projections with lower and upper estimates.
39
40 Councilmember Horst asked if larger utility lines will be constructed should the higher
41 population range be met. Mr. Hubmer stated that is correct as well as maintenance and system
42 performance issues.
43
44 Mr. Hubmer reviewed the recommendation section which had been modified based on City staff
45 input. He noted the water and sanitary sewer system recommended improvements have been
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 1
October 22, 2002
Page 11
1 prioritized from one to fourteen and probable costs included. Mr. Hubmer provided specifics on'
2 each of the improvements and explained the rationale for the ranking.
3
4 Councilmember Horst asked if the priority is listed as high for the new water main at Kenzie
5 Terrace based on current development. Mr. Hubmer stated it is standard engineering practice to
6 loop water services should a break occur, to sustain fire protection, and improve water quality.
7
8 Councilmember Thuesen asked if the City lost an opportunity to make these improvements
9 during a past construction improvement project. Mr. Hubmer stated that improvements have
10 been made during current street projects. He stated he does not think the City has missed an
11 opportunity to complete this project during a past construction project.
12
13 Councilmember Horst asked if a new water filtration system is being considered. Mr. Hubmer
14 stated it is not and would be the chlorine injection system.
15
16 Councilmember Thuesen asked if it is realistic to renovate the treatment facility at this point and
17 if it wore out more rapidly than anticipated. Mr. Hubmer stated it is realistic maintenance since
18 most systems have a service life of 20 to 30 years. They are looking at a maintenance program to
19 replace valves,meet code requirements, and safety requirements.
20
21 Mr. Humber stated that St. Anthony has a secure water system but new mandates have been
22 issued for each City to prepare a water security strategy plan.
23
24 Councilmember Thuesen asked about the recommendation to continue to identify and eliminate
25 inflow infiltration. He asked about results on what has been done so far and if there are
26 measurable results. Mr. Hubmer stated there are preliminary indications and the Metropolitan
27 Council.notified St. Anthony two weeks ago that with the record rainfall, the infiltration rates in
28 the sanitary sewer have been very high. He stated there will probably be an increase in sanitary
29 -sewer treatment rates in the range of 20-35%. Mr. Hubmer stated he and Roger Larson will
30 review those numbers and verify with the Metropolitan Council that their equipment is operating
31 correctly.
32
33 Councilmember Thuesen stated 15%of the flow is through I/I and asked if the City should be
34 more aggressive to identify and eliminate I/I problems. Mr. Hubmer stated there are several
35 residents who have addressed those issues through the public information process. He stated for
36 residents that have sanitary backup problems, this is their highest priority.
37
38 Mr. Hubmer stated that two years ago the City said they'd do an assessment in 2003 to evaluate
39 the effectiveness of improvements and to evaluate options to further reduce III, if necessary. He
40 stated that the street reconstruction projects have addressed the drainage concerns and have been
41 supported by residents.
42
43 Councilmember Thuesen asked if the problem with I/I is dumping sump pump water into the
44 sanitary sewer. Mr. Hubmer stated that some residents have passive drain tile connections to the
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 12
October 22, 2002
Page 12
1 sanitary sewer, which do not have sump pumps, and may not even know that they are discharging,
2 clear water into the sanitary sewer.
3
4 Councilmember Thuesen asked if that area should be looked at more closely during the 2003
5 study. Mr. Hubmer answered in the affirmative.
6
7 Councilmember Thuesen asked about the houses that are not metered. Mr. Hubmer stated there
8 are a small number of houses in St. Anthony that flow into Roseville or Minneapolis but it is felt
9 that it is not worth the cost to meter.
10
11 Councilmember Thuesen asked about the areas being picked out with the flows and trying to get
12 a rough idea of the flow. He asked if the City should be concerned whether the flow has been
13 estimated correctly and won't be worse than estimated. Mr. Hubmer stated that issue will be
14 raised with the Metropolitan Council. He stated the Metropolitan Council recognizes the need to
15 replace the meter on Lowery Avenue and since they have now indicated the flows are higher than
16 in the past, staff will raise the issue of the older meters and need to provide a more accurate
17 picture.
18
19 Councilmember Sparks stated Mr. Hubmer has identified a lot of projects for the next few years
20 and asked if this is above and beyond the City's normal maintenance projects or if the City has
21 the tax revenue to do these projects. Mr. Hubmer stated that is a good question about whether
22 the City has the revenue to do these projects. He stated he will be speaking with staff about
23 funding and will return with options for funding and impact on the community.
24
25 Councilmember Faust noted it has been suggested to replace motor controls at wells 3, 4 and 5 to
26 get a better rate to do all at the same time. He stated that typically they do not buy all the police
27 cars at one time,but integrate it over a number of years as the City does with the streets projects.
28 He asked if the wells are worn out now. Mr. Humber stated if you do the work at the same time
29 the mobilization costs will only be charged once. And, if they can purchase controls in quantities
30 of more than one, there will be a price break. The labor will also be better for three consecutive
31 jobs. Mr. Humber stated if the wells are done one at a time, that may better fit the City's budget
32 and is an option since the City is not in eminent danger of losing a well. However it is a high
33 priority project.
34
35 Councilmember Faust stated that strategically the City may be wise to phase the work so the
36 wells do not all wear out at one time. He asked staff to look at that option.
37
38 Mr. Morrison stated that he, Mr. Hubmer, Mr. Larson, and financial consultants will meet to put
39 together a financial plan for these projects. He stated that information will be provided at the
40 November 12th meeting since some of the projects may be ordered at the beginning of next year.
41 He noted the funding may involve rate increases, grants, or Metropolitan Council monies.
42
43 Councilmember Sparks asked if the City will assume the responsibility for the Northwest
44 Quadrant improvements. Mr. Morrison stated that is an area of negotiation and could be funded
45 through assessments. However if assessed the property may not be redeveloped. He stated there
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 13
October 22, 2002
Page 13
1 could be a special taxing district for that area and those negotiations are yet to be undertaken.
2 Mr. Mornson stated the developer may not want to build up to 700 homes if the City does not
3 have the sewer capacity to handle them.
4
5 1999 Street Reconstruction. Mr. Hubmer stated the resident has requested this item not be
6 considered tonight.
7
8 2001 Street Reconstruction. Mr. Hubmer stated that the project is 100% complete. There will be
9 ongoing maintenance issues, such as dead trees to be replaced. Recently an additional retaining
10 wall was constructed for some residents adjacent to the pond. Mr. Humber stated that he had met
11 with the contractor to discuss the completion of warranty work on driveways that did not meet
12 inspection.
13
14 2002 Street Reconstruction Protect. Mr. Hubmer stated the utility work is 100% complete,
15 driveways are in, and the contractor is bringing in topsoil, cleaning the site, and preparing for
16 sod,weather permitting.
17
18 C. Resolution 02-067 re: Authorizing Advertising for Bids for the 2003 Street Projects.
19 Mr. Hubmer stated this project includes the reconstruction of Edward Street from 33rd Avenue
20 NE to 34th Avenue NE; Belden Drive from 33rd Avenue NE to 34th Avenue NE; and 34th
21 Avenue NE from Stinson Boulevard to Silver Lake Road. He stated they will do several things
22 differently in 2003 to phase the project. He advised of the phases being proposed and how they
23 will provide information to residents should questions arise. Street reconstruction updates will
24 be provided every other week to bring everyone up to speed.
25
26 Mr. Hubmer stated they held a public information meeting and residents had some concerns
27 related to special access which can be addressed. He noted the project construction schedule
28
29 Councilmember Thuesen stated they discussed communication options,placing it on the website
30 and including it in newsletters. He stated he appreciates this effort to better communicate with
31 residents which will make their lives easier.
32
33 Mr. Hubmer stated they anticipate receiving bids and computing assessments in December of
34 2002, approving resolutions on improvement hearing and special assessments in January of 2003,
35 holding the public hearing for the project and assessments, award the bid and call for bond sales
36 in February of 2003, award the sale of bonds in March of 2003,begin construction in May of
37 2003, substantial completion of construction in October of 2003, certifying assessments to the
38 County Auditor in August of 2003, and final completion of construction in July of 2004.
39
40 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adopt Resolution 02-067, Authorizing Advertising for Bids
41 for the 2003 Street Projects.
42
43 Motion carried unanimously.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 14
October 22, 2002
Page 14
1 Mayor Hodson stated his concern is the cost estimated for the sewer and water system
2 improvements. He stated there is work ahead of the Council on how to pay for all of these .
3 improvements that are necessary repairs.
4
5 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
6 None.
7
8 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
9 Mr. Mornson stated there will be a joint meeting with the School Board at 6:00 p.m. next
10 Tuesday at the High School Media Center.
11
12 Mr. Mornson stated the Salvation Army will be holding an open house next Wednesday from
13 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. and in this facility from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m.
14
15 Mr. Mornson stated the North Metro Mayor's Association has requested the City's possible
16 participation in that organization. That has not been discussed formally but the Council can
17 informally attend the meeting tomorrow night. Mr. Mornson stated funds have not been
18 budgeted to join this organization but funds could be used from the EDA. He suggested that the
19 Council can discuss if they want to join at the December 9, 2002 budget meeting.
20
21 Mr. Mornson stated the closing of the Hardees site to Culver's Restaurant will be held on
22 Monday, October 28, 2002.
23
24 Councilmember Horst had nothing to report.
25
26 Councilmember Sparks had nothing to report.
27
28 Councilmember Thuesen had nothing to report.
29
30 Councilmember Faust stated the Council received information from the League and should vote
31 for the top five issues they feel are important.
32
33 Councilmember Faust stated a candidate forum was sponsored by the Chamber a week ago
34 Monday and reminded all to vote on November 5, 2002.
35
36 Councilmember Faust stated he met several times with Ehlers in preparation for the Metropolitan
37 Council meeting on October 16, 2002. He stated he appeared before the Metropolitan Council
38 Livable Communities Development Act Committee which is made up of 15 members. He stated
39 they asked questions about the project and funding. The Metropolitan Council has $6 million in
40 funding and St. Anthony asked for$3,250,000. He stated he told them the City could phase
41 some of the project in order to help them assist St. Anthony and came away with fairly good
42 review. He stated it was an interesting meeting.
43
44 Mr. Mornson stated that 40 communities applied for$45 million dollars and the Metropolitan
45 Council has only$6 million to give out. He stated Councilmember Faust had 15 minutes to
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 15
October 22, 2002
Page 15
1 make that presentation and noted the awards will be announced at a meeting next Wednesday,
2 October 30, 2002,by Chair Ted Mondale.
3
4 Councilmember Faust stated if St. Anthony is awarded some money, he would encourage all to
5 attend the presentation since he was one of two elected officials to make the presentation before
6 the Metropolitan Council. He stated the Mayor was out of town so he was able to make that
7 presentation and he believes that weights well in the favor of St. Anthony to show they are a
8 team and support each other and the efforts of the City.
9
10 Mayor Hodson thanked Councilmember Faust for making that presentation and stated he enjoys
11 the Council working together as a team.
12
13 Mayor Hodson reported on the transportation conference he attended in Chicago.
14
15 Mayor Hodson announced that he will hold another Coffee with the Mayor on November 2, 2002
16 from 8:00 to 10:30 a.m. He stated this will be a time he can answer questions on the upcoming
17 referendum, Apache redevelopment, or other issues. He stated recent sessions have been
18 excellent with great feedback being received from residents.
19
20 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
21 None.
22
23 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
24 None.
25
26 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
27 Motion by Councilmember Faust to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m.
28
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30
31 Respectfully submitted,
32
33
34 Carla Wirth
35 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
36
37 Mayor
38 ATTEST:
39 City Clerk
40
16
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: November 12, 2002 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
Motor Vehicle Starting License:
Murphy's Service Center, 3501 —29h Avenue NE
Massage Business License:
Muscle &Body Therapy: DBA Christine Ross Muscel&Body Therapy,
3805 Stinson Boulevard, St. Anthony, MN
Heating Contractors License:
Minnesota Gaslight, Inc., Fridley, MN 55432
Master Gas Fitters, North St. Paul, MN 55109
17
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
14 !T0
VON
Ishm: CASSAVA:
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
Old 6 W. TIM
.00011 ALSPACH/HOWARD 18698 11/13/02 82.53
005201 AMERICAN STORES 18699 11/ 13/02 56.39
008733 ANDERSON/MAURICE 18700 11/ 13/02 2,200.00
700; pX
RN
IT
008255 AVAYA, INC . 18704 11/13/02 28.72
.00003 BEARCOM 18705 11/ 13/02 1 ,978.22
008555 BIFFS, INC . 18706 11/13/O2 595.64
qp
of "11 1� boost
007386 CASTLE INSPECTION SERVIC 18710 11/13/02 5. 115.41
000610 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANq SVC 18711 11/ 13/02 41 .06
002380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 18712 11/13/02 1 ,672.01
kip. Oil
004107 CC]lyl PTC_ S COMMERCIAL CA 18716 11/13/02 6,677.55
008736 CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT 18717 11/ 13/02 225.31
005234 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT 18718 11/13/02 855. 14
NO
008834 DEMSEY 'S STUMP SERVICE 18722 11/13/02 90.00
000807 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 18723 11/13/02 17.85
008848 DIVERSIFIED CRYOGENICS 18724 11/13/02 163.00
�i ins
MAIM
0002 0 EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC . 18728 11/13/02 509.82
008666 EASYLINK SERVICES CORPOR 18729 11/13/02 101 .50
008809 ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 1873O 11/13/O2 91 .26
VAX 11j;
0 ) 153 FILTERFMIF 18734 11/13/02 36.94
008221 FOSTER,WENTZELL,HEDBACK, 18735 11/13/02 5,000. 0O
008647 FRATTALLONE 'S HARDWARE 18736 11/13/02 87.51
0 )06 XTER 69WER 18740 11/13/0? 40.00
0000 3. GLEN R GOST 18741 11/13/02 885.00
001100 GOODIN COMPANY 18742 11/13/02 40.97
Of
NOW
���
���
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
FAA b
Eqpt 0�
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
634. 13
008376 HENNEPIN CNTY SHERIFF 'S 18747 11/13/02 825. 00
008342 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 18748 11/13/02 39.43
alff
MAR i
008444 I .T.L. PATCH COMPANY, IN 18752 11/13/02 59. 13.
008658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I 18753 11 /13/02 69 .30
008826 INTERNATIONAL POLICE MOU 18754 11/13/02 40.00
dl 11SM51 11, 1
008791 LEAH KLUZ DESIGN 18758 11/13/02 1 , 100.CC)
007225 LEROY SIGNS ~ 18759 11/ 13/02 688.70
004233 LMCIT % BERKLEY RISK BE 18760 11/13/02 17,393.5O
CLEOD USA, INC . 18764 11/13/02 1 .817.94
002240 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 18765 11/13/02 48,626. 00
00228 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 18766 11/13/02 34.34
led
MONSON/JUDY 18770 11/13/0e. 13. 4
007159 NAPA AUTO PARTS 18771 11 / 13/02 2. 44
007312 NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMP 18772 11/13/02 5,088.20
iz
wi-
mpg
San
-1 DEPOT slim 11113furd
008277 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 18777 11/ 13/02 70.26
008594 PETERBILT NORTH 18778 11/13/O2 5.28
008369 POSTMASTER 18783 11/ 13/02 150.00
97 200 8
007057 PRAXAIR 18784 11/13/02 22. 14
Mai
007373 RAMSEY COUNTY 18789 11/ 13/02 3,283.27
009462 RAMSEY COUNTY 18790 11/13/02 6, 466.98
Sly 1
NOON
was Ow
���
����
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
J.
Ev
WIN
-001810 ST . ANTHONY VILLAGE KIWA 18794 11/13/02 155.00
0O8334 ST . PAUL OFFICE EQUIP. R 18795 11/ 13/02 75.00
.00008 STANDARD WATER CONTROL 18796 11/13/02 97.25
'1177 10
.00003 SURGE WATER CONDITIONING 18801 11/ 13/02 94.70
008700 TC WEB TECH 1880211/13/02 8,038.00
OWN
1, 60 TRACY PRINTING 18806 11/13/al: 4, 767.96
008018 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 18807 11/ 13/02 1 ,960. 82
007330 TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC . 18808 11/13/02 1 , 597.50
JIM
Rol
COMPANY 18812 11/13/02 69.37
008264 URS BRW 18813 11/ 13/02 7 ,500.00
.00009 VAHLE/SADIE 18814 11/ 13/02 10.00
ski SIR AMIN,
W. GO"TRA"" ! ICIATES 18818 11/13/02 4, 585.33
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT _ BLAIN 18819 11/ 13/02 346. 08
008919 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE 18820 11/13/02 1 , 443.08
will
ROM AMR
Nam
1-0 --yN to 111 1
whip
WAN
u�u��
��/
-
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
11 /05/2002 16: Check Register GL540R-VO6.40 PAGE 1
b NK VENDOR CHECk# DATE AMOUNT
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
- -'
008216 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 21325 11/ 13/O2 41 .6O `
008458 ACCESS CASH INTERNATIONA 21326 11/ 13/02 21 .23
008311 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRI 21327 11/ 13/02 630.65
004014 ALLIED PAPER CO. 21328 11/13/02 58.89
004015 AMERIPRIDE LINEN 21329 11/13/02 462 .61
008794 ARCTIC GLACIER INC . 21330 11/13/02 716.96
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 21331 11 / 13/02 31989 .32
008827 BLACKEY 'S BAKERY 21332 11/13/02 137 .31
004065 CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO 21333 11/ 13/02 405 . 95
004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO. , 21334 11/13/02 3 , 040.25
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 21335 11/13/02 868 . 80
004095 COCA COLA BOTTLING 21336 11/13/02 1 , 690 . 42
004120 EAGLE WINE Cn 21337 11/ 13/02 4,380 . 43
004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 21338 11 /13/02 41 ,262. 92
004130 ECOLAB 21339 11/13/02 149 . 05
008697 EXTREME BEVERAGE 21340 11/13/02 160 . 00
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 21341 11/ 13/02 571 . 75
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 21342 11/13/02 47566 . 87
004201 HEGGIES PIZZA 21343 11/13/02 164 . 65
004207 HOHENSTEIN 'S, INC 21344 11/13/02 2,546 . 15
004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 21345 11/13/02 11 ,310 . 67
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 21346 11/13/02 554648 . 23
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEW5PAPE 21347 11/ 13/02 460 . 00
. 004233 LMCIT % BERKLEY RISK SE 21348 11/13/02 1 ,323 .25
008229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 21349 11/ 13/02 18 . 19
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 21350 11/13/02 287505. 16
OO8263 MCLEOD USA, INC . 21351 11/13/02 680 . 03
002630 NORTH STAR TURFINC/SUN T 21352 11/13/02 82. 92
004334 NORTHEASTER 21353 11/13/02 558. 45
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 21354 11/13/02 51 .25
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 21355 11/13/02 61 .68
008250 PARK SUPPLY, INC. 21356 11/13/02 26. 77
004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 21157 11 / 13/O2 2 ,569.91
004355 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 21358 11/11/02 290.38
004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 21359 11/ 13/02 6,846.88
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 21360 11/13/02 3 , 758.54
OO877O PORTER/WILLIAM 21361 11/ 13/02 67 .00
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 21362 11/13/02 3 ,810.75
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 21363 11 / 13/02 15 ,528.80
008470 SUN NEWSPAPERS 21364 11/ 13/02 687.00
005004 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS 21365 11 / 13/02 182 .75
004468 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 21366 11/13/02 123.61
008875 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY 21367 11/13/02 643 .52
008507 US FOODSERVICE 21368 11/13/02 3 , 557.68
008888 VALPAK OF MINNEAPOLIS-ST 21369 11 / 13/02 1 , 625.00
008895 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP 21370 11/13/02 198.45
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 21371 11/ 13/02 346 . 39
008310 WINE MERCHANTS INC 21372 11 /13/02 240.40
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 205,069 .47 ***
-
��1N
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHON' ��J�
11 /05/2002 16: Check Register GL540R—VO6. 40 PHbL �
6mNK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008925 ADVO, INC 21373 11 /13/02 1 ,74O .96
008692 AT&T BROADBAND 21374 11 /13/02 ' 151 .52
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 21375 11 /13/02 62,950 .00
004135 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC 21376 11/13/02 265. 19
008787 PROMOTIONAL PAGES, INC . 21377 11/ 13/02 599 .00
004475 TRI TECH DISPENSING 21378 11/13/02 102 .50
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 65, 809 . 17 ***
,
!
,
22
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02-069
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMITTAL OF THE 2003 RAMSEY COUNTY
SCORE FUNDING GRANT APPLICATION AND
ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT FOR THIS PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Ramsey County has made a portion of its SCORE funding grant revenues available
to the City for its municipal source-separated recyclables program; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has completed the required grant application; and
WHEREAS, the funds would be used for the City's source-separated recyclables program.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
Hereby approves the submittal of the 2003 Ramsey County SCORE Funding Grant Application
and enter into a contract for this program.
Adopted this day of , 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Review for Administration:
City Manager
23
SAINT PAUL - RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION
2003 SCORE FUNDING GRANT APPLICATION
CITY/TOWNSHIP St. Anthony Village
CONTACT PERSON Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager
ADDRESS 3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
PHONE 612-789-8881 FAX 612-781-9323
A. DESCRIPTION OF 2003 RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
1. In 2003, will any collection services be provided under a contract? Yes No X
a. If so, provide contractor(s),address, and contact name.
b. Which type of households are expected to receive service under the contract?
Single-family: Duplex: Triplex: 4plex:
Townhome: Condominium: Manufactured Home Park:
Multi-unit buildings (up to units):
c. What is the total number of households expected to receive service under the contract?
Single-family thru 4-plex: Multi-unit buildings with 5 or more units:
d. What materials will be collected? (If different materials will be collected based on type of
housing, please describe differences.)
e. What is the collection frequency? (If frequency is different based on type of housing, please
describe differences.)
24
2. How will the municipality assure materials are collected in 2003 from those households that will
not receive recycling collection services under a municipally-arranged contract? (e.g., ordinance
provisions; licensing requirements, other mechanism) What materials are required to be
collected, and at what frequency?
By an ordinance requirement, whereby residential haulers are required to provide curbside
recycling services to single-family residential customers at no cost. Recyclable items collected
include newspapers, glass, plastic bottles,aluminum,and tin cans. Pick-up is arranged once per
week by the hauler of a resident's choice (BFI, Waste Management, or Walter's Rubbish).
It should be noted that while recycling services are not mandated in city code for multiple
family residential units, it appears that recycling services are available to the majority of those
residences as well. The City will continue to monitor the multiple family recycling scenario.
City staff has driven the Village and found there are just a few cases where recycling is not
available. It is safe to say the majority of St. Anthony residences have recycling services.
3. What changes are planned or anticipated for 2003?
None are anticipated.
4. How are recycling services in 2003 to be paid for, beyond any use of SCORE funds? What long-
term funding source is in place for recycling services?
The City picks up what SCORE funds don't. Ramsey County SCORE funds have covered the
following in past years: administration costs, Clean-Up Day associated costs, city newsletter
production, printing, and mailing costs,and recycling bins. The City plans to have similar costs
covered by Ramsey County SCORE funds in 2003.
In terms of long-term, the City would pay for expenses out of the General Fund reserves
and any applicable portion of the Hennepin County grant funds.
5. Describe the municipality's source reduction and recycling promotional efforts. List types of
materials to be used, intended audiences,and method and frequency of distribution.
City Newsletter, Village Notes- published quarterly; St Anthony Ramsey (and Hennepin)
County residents and businesses are the intended audiences.
Government Cable Channel 16 - information related to recycling is posted here on the
bulletin board; St. Anthony residents are the audience.
City Monument Sign - There is a monument sign in front of the Stonehouse, where the City
will post community events,such as Clean Up Day in May; this is for area residents.
25
5., cont'd
In addition, the City has flyers available in the City Hall information rack and handouts are
given to new residents when they or anyone else picks up their recycling bins. The City also
organizes and promotes its annual Spring Clean Up Day. The Recycling Coordinator works with the
local newsletters and community groups to encourage and maintain recycling efforts throughout,
the City.
6. What measurable goals do you have for source reduction and recycling activities in 2003?
Please describe how you will measure progress toward those goals and how activities will be
evaluated.
The City of St. Anthony proposes to use SCORE funds to maintain and increase participation and
tonnage collected. One measurable goal is to increase publicity for recycling. In 2003,the City will
bring more waste reduction and recycling information to the City's web site at www.ci.saint-
anthony.mn.us. The City has recently renovated the web site and it has a new look as well as new
information and improved organization. The activity will be evaluated through looking at the web
site at the beginning and the end of 2003 and evaluating the web site content to see whether there
is an increase.
7. If any activities will be conducted by a contractor or subcontractor, what provisions will be made to
monitor and audit (sub)contractor activities?
City staff reviews the recycling volume/numbers that come in from the three residential
haulers. The City requires regular reporting and monitors the reports.
26
B. SCORE GRANT REQUEST
1. Please describe how a SCORE grant would enhance or improve source reduction and recycling
efforts in your community. List specific activities for which SCORE funding would be used.
City Administration of Recycling: to prepare recycling reports and disseminate recycling
information to Ramsey County residents. In addition, the plan will be to continue put information
on the city cable channel bulletin board.
City Promotion of Recycling: to pay for the production, printing,and mailing of the recycling
section of the quarterly city newsletter, Vi//age Notes, that goes to Ramsey County residents.
Recycling Bins: to purchase recycling bins for residents to be able to pick up at City Hall.
Clean Up Day: to cover personnel costs associated with the collection of recyclables and the
bins, equipment, etc. for the City's annual Clean Up Day, held the first Saturday of May.
0
2. Please show how you intend to allocate your 2003 SCORE grant. Detail how you intend to use
SCORE funds within each applicable budget area. Attach a copy of your 2003 municipal
budget for all recycling activities, including all funding sources. (If the budget has not been
adopted by your governing body, attach the most current draft budget.)
PROPOSED SCORE BUDGET—SCORE EXPENSES ONLY
ADMINISTRATION: $2,600
City staff time for reporting, etc.
City staff time for inputting recycling information on the city cable channel
PROMOTION ACTIVITIES $1,011
Vi//age Notes production, printing,and mailing
Web design and hosting of recycling information
EQUIPMENT $200
Recycling Bins
COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES $1,000
Clean Up Day costs (personnel, lease equipment)
Spring/Fall Tree and Brush Collections
TOTAL SCORE GRANT $4,911
27
C. IN-HOUSE RECYCLING PROGRAM
Please describe the recycling program for materials generated at municipal facilities, per
requirements in Minn. Stat. Sec. 115A.151. List materials collected and service provider(s). If any
materials are brought to a drop-off center or otherwise not handled by a collection service, list
those materials and describe how they are transferred.
All St. Anthony city facilities (City Hall, Public Works, and the Fire Station) have in-house
recycling programs for 4 broad types of materials (paper, metal,glass, plastic,and textiles). The
City's hauler is Waste Management. The recycled material goes to the MRF in northeast
Minneapolis.
D. RESOLUTION
Please attach a resolution from your governing body requesting the funding allocation or a certified
copy of the official proceedings at which the request was approved. SCORE grants agreements
cannot be issued without such an attachment.
The resolution will be on the St. Anthony City Council's November 12, 2002,agenda, and will be
submitted after that date to Ramsey County Environmental Health.
NAME OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SUBMIT GRANT:
Susan M.H. Hall
TYPE OR PRINT
SIGNATURE
Assistant City Manager
TITLE
10-21-02
DATE
28
Please return the completed grant application form to:
DAN DONKERS, PROGRAM ANALYST
SAINT PAUL - RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION
1670 BEAM AVENUE, SUITE A
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
29
RECYCLING FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
REVENUES 2000 2001 2002 2003
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Hennepin County Grants $17,272 $18,360 $17,500 $17,500
Ramsey County Grants $5,248 $1,849 $5,300 $5,000
Recycling Fees Collected $0 $0 1 $0 $0
Clean-Up Day Revenues $2,455 $3;634 $3,000 $3,000
Interest Earnings $3,589 $2,010 $3,000 $2,000
Miscellaneous Revenues $0 $0 $0 $0
Fund Balance Reserves L0 K0 $5,700 $9,000
RECYCLING FUND TOTAL REVENUES $28,564 $25,853 $34,500 $36,500
EXPENDITURES 2000 2001 2002 2003
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
Personal Services $24,500 $24,500 $24,500 $25,500
Consulting&Contracted Services $0 $0 $0 $0
Printing&Publishing $3,922 $8,076 $5,000 $5,500
Travel/School/Conference $0 $0 $0 $0
Recycling Bins/Misc. $0 $1,848 $2,000 $2,000
Clean-Up Day Expenses $2,609 $3,764 $3,000 $3,500
Transfers to Other Funds $0 $16,278 $3,000 $0
RECYCLING FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES $31,031 $54,466 $37,500 $36,500
FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $53,005 $24,392 $15,692 $6,692
30
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 02 - 070
A RESOLUTION APPROVING 2003 SALARY OF
MICHAEL J. MORNSON, ST. ANTHONY CITY MANAGER
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony employs Michael J. Mornson as its City Manager; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and the City Manager have agreed to a 2003 salary of$87,030.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby authorizes an annual salary of$87,030 for City Manager Michael J. Mornson, effective
January 1, 2003.
Adopted this day of ) 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
? 31 �
WSB J
�c Associates,Inc.
November 7, 2002
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff
c City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony Village, MN 55418-1603
„ Re: Sanitary Sewer and Water System Recommended Improvements
City of St. Anthony Village
WSB Project No. 1065-69
Dear Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
This letter is a follow-up to your October 22, 2002 Council Meeting in regards to the
findings of the Sanitary Sewer And Water Studies. To further clarify the needs.for
improvements within the City of St. Anthony Village, these projects have been divided
into immediate maintenance concerns, nonrecurring maintenance projects and
development driven projects. These projects are classified as follows:
I. Immediate Maintenance Needs
r
C The projects, which require immediate maintenance, are those projects, which, if
failure occurs, would interrupt service of the sanitary sewer or water systems within
��. the Village. These projects are as follows:
Recommended Im rovements Pretiminary Opinion of Probable Cost
1. Replacement of the sanitary Sewer
System South of 27`I'Avenue to the
City of Minneapolis. $613,000
2. Construct 10-inch water main loop at
Kenzie Terrace $429,000
3. Renovate the Chemical Room at the
t water treatment facility. $933,000
t: 4. Improve electrical service and motor
4
controls at Well Houses No. 3, 4, and
5• $454,000
415 Olson Total Cost of Improvements $2,429,000
Memorial Highway'
iuit�.300
Minneapolis
inhesota
2
7 (541.4800
763,541 1700 FAX Minneapolis • St. Cloud • Equal Opportunity Ern 6yVWIN\1065-69\110702-hmcc.doc
Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff 32
City of St.Anthony Village
November 7,2002
Page 2 of 3
II. Water and Sewer System Nonrecurring Maintenance Improvements
These improvements are necessary to be completed to the sewer and water system
but are not of a nature, which will interrupt service in the near future. These
improvements are listed below along with the Opinion of Probable Cost:
Water and Sewer System Improvements Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost-
1. Prepare water security strategy plan. $10,000
2. System-wide controls and telemetry
improvements. $285,000
3. Televise sanitary sewer lines in Kenzie
Terrace Area. $5,000
4. Continue to identify and eliminate
sources of inflow and infiltration to the
sanitary sewer system. $20,000/annually
5. Construct closed-loop booster pump
station to serve the area near Rankin
Road and 32°a Avenue $729,000
Total Cost of Improvements $1,049,000
111. Development Driven Improvements
There are a number of recommended improvements, which are anticipated to be
needed as a result of development either at Apache Plaza or in the Southern portion
of St. Anthony in the vicinity of Kenzie Terrace. These projects are:
Development Driven Improvements Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost
1. Construct new trunk sanitary sewer
line and increase the capacity of the
Foss Road lift station to serve
Apache Plaza redevelopment. $1,580,000
2. Rewire and re-pipe High Service
Pumps No. 3 and 4. $537,000
3. Provide Additional water main
looping in the Kenzie Terrace area. $592,000
4. Add a fifth High Service Pump to the
distribution system. $420,000
Total Cost of Improvements $5,568,000
F:I WPWIM 1065-691110702-hmcc.doc
Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff 33
City of St.Anthony Village
November 7,2002
Page 3 of 3
If you have any questions on these recommendations, I will be available at the November
12, 2002 Council Meeting to discuss these items with you, or please feel free to call me at
763-287-7182.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
dv
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Project Manager
sm
F.I WPWIM106S-691110702-hmcc.doc
10/22/2002
Water and Sanitary Sewer Systems Recommended Improvements
PRELIMINARY
OPINION OF
PROBABLE
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PRIORITY YEAR COST
1. Sanitary sewer replacement south of 271 -
Avenue to Minneapolis High 2003 $6139000
2. Construct new 10-inch water main at Kenzie
Terrace High 2003 $4299000
Renovate chemical room at water treatment
3- facility High 2003 $9339000
4. Improve electrical service and motor controls at
well houses 3, 4 and 5 High 2004 $454,000
5. System wide controls and telemetry 2004-
improvements Medium 2006 $285,000
6. Replace sanitary sewer in Apache Plaza area Medium 2005-
dependent upon development) 2006 $155809000
7. Re-wire and re-pipe high service pumps 3 and 4 Medium 2005- $5379000
2006
8. Prepare a water security strategy plan Medium 2004 With City
9. Televise sanitary sewer lines in Kenzie Terrace
$
Medium 2003 $59000
area
CAMyFiles\Work\St.Anthony\combined improvements summary table.doc
10/22/2002
PRELIMINARY
OPINION OF
PROBABLE
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PRIORITY YEAR COST
10. Provide additional water main looping in the
Kenzie Terrace area Medium 2006 $5929000
11. Continue to identify and eliminate sources of Continue
inflow and infiltration Medium Ongoing existing I/I
program
12. Monitor VOC, radium and arsenic Existing testing
concentrations from existing wells Low Ongoing
bud et
13. Add a fifth high service pump to the
distributions stem Low 2007 $420,000
14. Add a closed loop booster pump station to serve Low 2
the area near Rankin Road and 32 Avenue 007 $7299000
C:\MyFiles\Work\St.Anthony\combined improvements summary table.doc p��
36
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ORDINANCE 2002 - 006
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATER RATES; AMENDING
SECTION 610.02 OF THE ST. ANTHONY CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains:
Section 1. Section 610.02 of the St. Anthony City Code, shall be amended to read as
follows:
610.02 Water Rates. Water bills will be computed quarterly based on metered water
used at the rate of$1.73 per 100 cubic feet or any fraction thereof.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective as of the date of its publication.
First Reading: November 12, 2002
Second Reading:
Adopted:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk.
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
37
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 15,2002
TO: Mike Mornson,City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson,Finance Director
ITEM: 2003 WATER/SEWER RATES
The Public Works Director has submitted a 2003 water-operating budget of$454,900 and a sewer-
operating budget of$878,700.
Based on the expenditures of those budgets, I have completed an analysis to determine if a rate
increase is necessary to balance these operating budgets. The results are as follows:
Water. (Moderate increase is necessary)
In 2003, it is anticipated that St. Anthony will sell 40,750,000 cubic feet of water. Calculating the
estimated 2003 water sales and multiplying it by the current rate of$1.10 per 100 cubic feet shows a
total estimated income of$448,200(40,750,000 divided by 100 x$1.10).
Expenditures of $454,900 plus the water filtration transfer of $15,200 requires revenues to total
$470,100, which indicates an increase of 6 cents per 100 cubic feet is necessary to balance the 2003
water operating budget. The increase in the water rate to $1.16 per 100 cubic feet would cost the
average St.Anthony household a$1.68 per quarter.
Recommendation_
The present rate of $1.10 per 100 cubic feet is not sufficient to balance the 2003 water-
operating budget. Staff recommends the ordinance (Section 610 — Water,. Subdivision
#610.02) be amended to reflect a 2003 rate of $1.16 per 100 cubic feet.
_fewer. (Significant increase is necessary)
Each year Metro Waste estimates sewer charges based on flowage and disposal statistics. In 2002,
St. Anthony's sanitary waste flowage was estimated at 376,830,000 gallons. A sewer rate of$2.08
per 100 cubic feet was sufficient to balance operating costs and sanitary waste disposal charges of
$463,500(376,830,000 divided by 1,000,000 X$1,230.00 per million disposal fee).
Recently, Metro Waste established the estimated flowage for 2003 at 469,100,000 gallons. This
represents a 24.4% increase in flowage. The cost for sanitary disposal is estimated at $576,800,
which represents a$113,300 increase over 2002.
38
Metro Waste has indicated the main reason for the increase is the heavy rains that occurred over the
summer months had a direct affect on the increase in flowage. A considerable portion of the rain
infiltrates the sanitary sewer system versus being diverted to the storm water run-off system.
Currently, St. Anthony requires homeowners who sell their property to disconnect passive drain tile
systems from the sanitary sewer. In addition, the City has an on-going M education program that is
administered annually with each street reconstruction project.
The amount of estimated sewer revenue is.based on average sales equaling 35,575,000 cubic feet.
Calculating the projected 2003 sewer revenue at the current rate of$2.08 per 100 cubic feet shows a
total income of $739,900 and a slenificant increase is necessaa to halance the sewer h ldgrl.
Projected operating costs of$878,700 for sanitary sewer produces a deficit of($138,800), which is
primarily made up of the M.W.C.C. increase.
To balance the budget and offset the increase in disposal costs, a sanitary sewer rate of$2.47 per 100
cubic feet is necessary (35,575,000 divided by 100 X $2.47 = $878,700). This increase would cost
the average St. Anthony household$10.92 per quarter.
In 1988, the City Council passed an ordinance relating to sewer rates and charges. This ordinance
allows for changes in the sewer rates without amending the ordinance. The rate increase is
handled administratively and requires no Council action.
Comparing 2002 to 2003 ra tes
Average Quarterly Utility Bill:
2800 CCF of water
Increase
2002 2003 Per Quarter
Water $30.80 $ 32.48 $ 1.68
Sewer $58.24 S 69.16 S10,92
$89.04 $101.64 $12.60
39
For biffing auestions, lease call 651-602-1189
Line Ad' Identifier Description Quantity UOM Unit Amt Net Amount
1 1.00 48,626.00 48,626.00
Flow APR-JUNE 2002 (In 1,000,000 gallons) 118.60
Rate Per 1,000,000 Gallons 1230.00
Quarterly Billing $145,878.00
Total net quarterly billing: $145,878.00
Billing per Month: $48,626.00
THIS IS YOUR WASTEWATER SERVICE BILL FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2002
ANY IINPAID BALANCE OVER 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF INVOICE WILL BE SUBJECT TO A
FINANCE CHARGE AT THE RATE OF 1.5% PER MONTH (18% PER YEAR)
SUBTOTAL: 48,626.00
I
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE : 48, 62
Fcr billing questions, lease call 651-602-1189
Line Ad' Identifier Description Quantity UOM Unit Amt Net Amount
1 1.00 31,000.10 31,000.10
Flow JAN-MARCH 2002 (In 1,000,000 gallons) 75.61
Rate Per 1,000,000 Gallons 1230.00
Quarterly Billing $93,000.30
Total net quarterly billing: $93,000.30
Billing per Month: $31,000.10
THIS IS YOUR WASTEWATER SERVICE BILL FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 2002
ANY UNPAID BALANCE OVER 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF INVOICE WILL BE SUBJECT TO A
FINANCE CHARGE AT THE RATE OF 1.5% PER MONTH (18% PER YEAR)
SUBTOTAL: 31,000.10
AMOUNT DUE : 31, 000 .10
'R'
ry! �
iI�YSB 40
p
,t&sociates,Inc.
I
November 7, 2002
i
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony Village, MN 55418-1603
Re: Financing Options Available for the Implementation
of the Proposed Sanitary and Sewer Improvements
City of St. Anthony Village
WSB Project No. 1065-69
Dear Mayor, City Council, and Staff: LU
This letter presents to you the options available for financing the recommended
improvements within the Sanitary Sewer and Water System Studies. Attached,please find
two tables indicating the proposed 2003 budget increase and the impact of issuing Public
Improvement Bonds for the construction improvements on the City's water and sewer
rates.
.r The attached tables were prepared by the Director of Finance with the assistances of Ehlers
&Associates. The attached tables indicate two proposed increases to the water and sewer
rates within the City of St. Anthony Village. The rate increases proposed are as follows:
0
I. 2003 Sanitary Sewer and Water Rate Adjustment. Alu
On a quarterly basis, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services bills the
City of St. Anthony for the treatment of wastewater discharges. Earlier this year,
the Metropolitan Council notified the City of St. Anthony that due to the wet
conditions in the year 2002, the sanitary sewer flows measured from St. Anthony
Village have increased significantly from the previous year. Therefore, the sanitary
1 sewer and water rates will be adjusted to cover the additional treatment costs of the
{ sanitary sewer flows. This annual rate adjustment will impact average consumers
t
and the senior citizen and minimum-bill consumer as follows: ;
415"1 Olson Water and Sewer Consumer 2002 Quarterly Rates 2003 Quarter! Rates
McTorial Highway, Average Consumer $89.04 $101.64
Suite 300 Senior Citizens/Minimurn Bill $31.80 $36.30
inns apolis -
` 'npesota This rate increase is necessary to cover the actual costs of water and wastewater treatment LL
5\42 in St. Anthony Village.
7 ;541.4800
i
763,541.1700 FAX Minneapolis • St.Cloud • Equal Opportunity Em�WWM1065-69\1107022-hmcc.doc
Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff 41
City of St.Anthony Village
November 7,2002
Page 2 of 3
II. Proposed Budget Increase to Fund Sanitary Sewer and Water System
Improvements
To fund the sanitary sewer and water system improvements requiring immediate
maintenance and to establish a non-recurring maintenance fund for the purpose of
constructing the other necessary improvements has the following impact on the
City's water and sewer rates:
Quarterly Rates Quarterly Rates Quarterly Rates
Water and Sewer Users 2002 Average 2003 Adjusted 2003 Adjusted to
Fund Improvements
Average Consumer $89.04 $101.64 $117.60
Senior Citizens/Minimum Bill $31.80 $36.30 $42.00
Based on our review of the recommendations on the impacts to the water and sewer rates,
we feel there are three options available for consideration. These options are:
I. Approve Budget Increase
This alternative considers approving only the rate increase to cover the
Metropolitan Council Charges for Sanitary Sewer flows in 2002 and not
constructing the sanitary sewer and water system improvements.
H. Approve Budget Increase and Construct Sanitary Sewer and Water System
Improvements That Require Immediate Maintenance.
This alternative considers implementing the first four projects on the
recommendation list and establishing a nonrecurring maintenance fund (of$0.05 in
each of the four years). This alternative would allow the first four options of the
recommendation list to be constructed immediately.
III. Approve Budget Increase with Project Phasing
This alternative considers constructing the first four improvements on the
recommendation's list over the next three years and phasing in rate increases over
the three-year period. This alternative also considers establishing the nonrecurring
maintenance fund($0.05 in each of the next four years).
It is our recommendation that Alternative No. 2 be considered by the Council to approve
the budget increase and construct the first four improvement projects for the sanitary sewer
and water system in 2003. By constructing all of these projects simultaneously, there will
be savings recognized by the City of St. Anthony in bond issuance fees, inflationary costs
associated with building materials and labor and the potential for interest rates to increase
between now and any future issuance of bonds.
F.•IWPWfl'A]065-69V 107022-hmcc.doc
Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff 42
City of St.Anthony Village
November 7,2002
Page 3 of 3
If you have any questions, I will be available at your November 12, 2002 Council Meeting,
or please call me at 763-287-7182.
Sincerely,
WSB &Associates, Inc.
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Project Manager
Attachment
sm
F.I WPWIM 1065-6911107022-hmcc.doc
43
Water/Sewer Increase:
Average Consumption = 2800 CF
I. 2002 Average Quarterly Water/Sewer Bill
$1.10 per 100 cf $ 30.80 Water
$2.08 per 100 cf $ 58.24 Sewer
$ 89.04
II. 2003 Proposed Budget Increase:
$1.16 per 100 cf $ 32.48 Water (Increase)
$2.47 per 100 cf $ 69.16 Sewer Month Quart er Annual
$101.64 $ 4.20 $12.60 $ 50.40
III. 2003 Budget Increase to Construct System Improvements
1. Sanitary Sewer/27th Avenue - $.13 $ 1.21 $ 3.64 $ 64.96
2. 10" Water Main-Kenzie - $.09 $ .84 $ 2.52 $ 75.04
3. Chemical Room Restoration- $.20 $ 1.87 $ 5.60 . $ 97.44
4. Electrical Improvements- $.10 $ .93 $ 2.80 $108:64
5. Non-Recurring Maintenance Fund- $.OS .47 $ 1.40 $114.24
(Phase in 5 cents per year increase for the next 4 years) $9.52 $28.56
IV. Non- Recurring Maintenance Fund Balance
2003 $ 20,375
2004 $ 61,125
2005 $122,250
2006 $203,750
Each year thereafter $81,500 would be added to the Fund Balance
44
Water/Sewer Increase:
Senior Citizens/Minimum Bill
(Approximately 550 or 23% of our 2384 Quarterly Utility Bills are Minimum Bills)
I. 2002 Minimum Water/Sewer Bill
$ 11.00 Water
$ 20.80 Sewer
$ 31.80
II. 2003 Proposed Budget Increase
$ 11.60 Water (Increase)
$ 24.70 Sewer Month Quarte r Annual
$ 36.30 $ 1.50 $ 4.50 $ 18.00
III. 2003 Budget Increase to Construct System Improvements .
1. Sanitary Sewer/27`h Avenue - $.13 $ .43 $ 1.30 $ 23.20
2. 10" Water Main- Kenzie - $.09 $ .30 $ .90 $ 26.80
3. Chemical Room Restoration- $.20 $ .67 $ 2.00 $ 34.80
4. Electrical Improvements- $.10 $ .33 $ 1.00 $ 38.80
5. Non-Recurring Maintenance Fund- $.05 $ .17 $ .50 $ 40.80
(Phase in 5 cents per year increase for the next 4 years) $ 3.40 $10.20
Water/Sewer Rates for 2003:
(If all projects/non-recurring maintenance is approved)
Water = $1.73 per ccf
Sewer = $2.47 per ccf
November 7, 2002
' honv!. tilia e FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues
November 26 Regular Planning Commission- 11/19
Ord.water/sewer rate increases(2°d reading)
Ord. amend fee schedule end'reading)
December 9 5- 7 pm Conduct interviews of Planning&Parks
Commission candidates
Regular Truth in taxation
(possibly last
meeting of the
year)
Ord.water/sewer rate increases(3rd reading)
December 19 (if needed) Continuation of Truth in taxation
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 09130/2002
Interest Date
BREMER-ST ANTHONY BANK Rate Purchased Maturi Book Value
INVESTMENT DEMAND-MONEY MARKET SAVINGS 1.85% 1 DAY LIQUIDITY(SWEEP) $119,770.44
4/M GENERAL
$582,000 MORT NET TRUST PLUS COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.63% 07/30/02 10121/02 $579,853.07
$276,000 BEETHOVEN FUNDING COOMERCIAL PAPER 1.63% 09/24/02 12/20/02 $274,932.80
$1,400,000 FHLMC MEDIUM NOTE-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 08/09/01 08/27/31 $134,373.51
$989,159.38
41M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION
$100,000 FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.46% 05/12/99 01/08/08 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN'MORTGAGE-COUPON 6.00% 11/01101 11/28/16 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-COUPON 6.05% 09/18/02 09/18/17 $100,000.00
$800,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 01/12/99 01/28/19 $202,057.98
$1,225,000 FED HOME LONE BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 09/24/01 10/18/21 $309,401.28
$1,250,000 FED HOME LONE BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 11/07/01 02/22/29 $191,662:50
$240,000 FED HOME LONE BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.00% 08105/05 08/15/22 $61,800.00
$408,000 NEW CENTER ASSET COMM PAPER PARKS 1.65% 06/14/02 10/21/02 $405,631.56
$444,000 MORT NET TRUST PLUS COMM PAPER PARKS 1.63% 07/30/02 11/20/02 $441,756.20
$2,012,309.52
DAIN RAUSCHER-GENERAL
GNMA POOL 4734 8.50% 02/01/75 01/15/05 $170.25
GNMA POOL 6472 7.50% 07/01/75 07/15/05 $797.67
GNMA POOL 14376 7.50% 03/01/77 03/15/07 $1,433.88
GNMA POOL 23364 9.00% 09/01 R8 09115/08 $663.02
GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01/78 11115/08 $1,590.36
$100,000 FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 07/25/02 07/25/22 $100,000.00
$670,000 FED HOME LOAN MTG-ZERO COUPON 7.150% 01/22/02 02/22/29 $99,948.90
$402,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMM PAPER 1.744% 07/12/02 11115/02 $399,599.03
$503,000 AMERICAN EXPRESS COMM PAPER 1.747% 07112/02 12/15/02 $499,253.88
$100,000 PROVIDENT BANK C/D-STEP/UP 5.000% 05130/02 05/30/17 $100,000.00
$100,000 RESOURSE BANK C/D 5.000% 09/19/02 09/19/17 $100,000:00
$1,303,456.99
DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL
$100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12/15/99 03/08/29 $10,105.00
$100,000 LASELLE BANK-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.50% 09/11/02 09/11122 $27,798.64
$100,000 STANDARD.FEDERAL-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.50% 09/11/02 09/11/22 $27,798.64
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.25% 6.25% 12118/01 12/27/16 $200,000.00
$ 95,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.00% 6.00% 12/28/01 01/17/17 $95,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.00% 6.00% 09/16/02 03/15/17 $203,600.00
$90,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.00% 6.00% 09/26/02 09/26/17 $90,000.00
$ 50,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.00% 6.25% 10/01/02 11/29/21 $50,000.00
$704,302.28
DEAN WITTER
$500,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE-ZERO 6.00% 10/29/98 08/20118 $128,730.00
$550,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE-ZERO 7.950% 11/24/99 06/22/18 $129,228.00
$680,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-ZERO 7.10% 06/15101 04/05/19 $97,722.56
$535,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-ZERO 7.493% 07/09101 02102/23 $109,514.50
$220,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO 7.011% 07/19/01 08/20/18 $67,782.00
$520,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH ZERO COUPON BOND 6.00% 09/24/02 09/15/18 $199,477.00
Tim @10/24/2002 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT SEPT 2002INVESTI
DEAN WATER (Continued)
$44,000.00 WESTERN PUERTO RICO-C/D 2.05% 04/16/02 10/24/02 $44,000.00
$90,000.00 WRIGHT EXPRESS FINANCIAL C/D 2.00% 05/16/02 11/18/02 $90,000.00
$200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6.00% 11/14/01 11/14/16 $200,000.00
$200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-SEMI 6.00% 11/19/01 11/19/21 $197,000.00
$200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-STEP UP 6.50% 12/28/01 12/15/16 $200,000.00
$100,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE 6.25% 07/31/02 07/31/17 $100,000.00
$200,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK MED TERM NOTE 5.976% 08/27/02 10/25/16 $200,000.00
$1,763,454.06
DAIN RAUCHER-(HRA)
$200,000-FNMA-9334 P/O 7.24% 04/20/93 03/25/23 $24,723.52
$ 50,000-FHLMC MCB SER 1629MB 7.00% 02/07/94 01/15/23 $30,636.11
$250,000-FHLMC MEDIUM SERIES 3B/E 6.00% 6.00% 10/25/01 10/15/16 $250,000.00
$100,000-FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6.00% 6.00% 11/14/01 12/07/16 $100,000.00
$200,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 11116/01 11/29121 $198,702.93
$200,000-FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 06/28/02 06/27/16 $200,000.00
$100,000-FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 08/05/02 08/05/16 $100,000.00
$250,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 08/28/02 08/28/17 $250,000.00
$300,000-GENERAL ELECTRIC COMMERCIAL PAPER - PARKS 1.678% 07/11/02 10/09102 $298,769.00
$300,000-FNMA MEDIUM TERM ZERO COUPON 7.20% 05123/01 05/07/18 $99,562.70
$1,000,000-FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-ZERO COUPON 7.75% 12/27/01 12/27/21 $218.563.80
$1,770,958.06
TOTAL BOOK VALUE $8,663,410.73
-----------------
-----------------
Time10/2412002 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT SEPT 20021NVESTI
September -2002 City of St.Anthony
Profit& Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE 09/30/02 09/30101 (Decrease)
Sales $157,040.00 $161,223.00 $62,445.00 $3,663,988.00 $3,538,589.00 $125,399.00
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $123,934.00 $126,009.00 $20,712.00 $2,606,787.00 $2,543,209.00 $63,578.00
Gross Profit $33,106.00 $35,214.00 $41,733.00 $1,057,201.00 $995,380.00 $61,821.00
Ratio to Net Sales 21.08% 21.84% 66.83% 28.85% - 28.13%
Operating Expense:
Salaries, Wages, Benefits $14,292.00 $14,484.00 $24,251.00 $502,714.00 $466,755.00 $35,959.00
All Other Expenses $12,087.00 $14,302.00 $16,038.00 $380,361.00 $385,288.00 ($4,927.00)
Total Operating Expense $26,379.00 $28,786.00 $40,289.00 $883,075.00 .$852,043.00 $31,032.00
Ratio to Net Sales 16.80% 17.85% 64.52% 24.10% 24.08%
Profit from Operations $6,727.00 $6,428.00 $1,444.00 $174,126.00 $143,337.00 $30,789.00
Other Income ($52.00) $297.00 $3,251.00 $40,272.00 $39,496.00 $776.00
Net Income $6,675.00 $6,725.00 $4,695.00 $214,398.00 $182,833.00 $31,565.00
Ratio to Net Sales 4.25% 4.17% 7.52% 5.85% 5.17%
September-Net Income $18,095.00
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 09/30/02 $90,866.00 $84,836.00 $38,696.00 $214,398.00
YEAR TO DATE 09/30/01 $63,112.00 $78,294.00 $41,427.00 $182,833.00
INCREASE/DECREASE $27,754.00 $6,542.00 ($2,731.00) $31,565.00
September - 2002 City of St.Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I SAV II
Beginning Inventory: $224,661.97 Beginning Inventory: $245,590.20
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers: SAV 1 $2,049.99 Transfers ($2,049.99)
Stonehouse ($6,443.95) Adjustments ($135.63)
Adjustments ($1,318.37) **** Returns to Vendors ($5,856.08) ****
Returns to Vendors ($4,123.10)
Add: Receiving $120,091.66
Add: Receiving $117,647.64
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($125,873.75)
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($122,615.97)
TOTAL $231,766.41
TOTAL $209,858.21
Total per Valuation Report $233,216.91 ***
Total per Valuation Report $208,051.54 ***
Difference $1,450.50
Difference ($1,806.67)
Beginning October 2002 Inventory $208,051.54 Beginning October 2002 Inventory $233,216.91
***Comes from Valuation Report ***Comes from Valuation Report
****Complete Physical Inventory Taken ****Complete Physical Inventory Tak
2001 Actual Profits (Audited) 2002 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Stonehouse Profits Comparison
January ($1,369.00) $1,857.00 ($1,701.00) ($1,213.00) January $5,583.00 $2,817.00 $3,554.00 $11,954.00 $13,167.00
February $1,620.00 $4,474.00 $9,410.00 $14,291.00 February $6,023.00 $6,005.00 $9,656.00 $33,638.00 $19,347.00
March $9,236.00 $7,127.00 $7,510.00 $38,164.00 March $10,455.00 $10,709.00 $7,145.00 $61,947.00 $23,783.00
April $5,631.00 $4,295.00 $10,712.00 $58,802.00 April $7,341.00 $6,511.00 $10,932.00 $86,731.00 $27,929.00
May $5,705.00 $6,957.00 $1,372.00 $72,836.00 May $10,901.00 $14,402.00 $6,374.00 $118,408.00 $45,572.00
June $16,325.00 $14,485.00 $2,734.00 $106,380.00 June $15,926.00 $16,381.00 $1,586.00 $152,301.00 $45,921.00
July $9,392.00 $12,077.00 $3,712.00 $131,561.00 July $8,989.00 $9,839.00 ($7,247.00) $163,882.00 $32,321.00
August $3,986.00 $12,825.00 $3,261.00 $151,633.00 August $18,973.00 $11,447.00 $2,001.00 $196,303.00 $44,670.00
September $12,586.00 $14,197.00 $4,417.00 $182,833.00 September $6,675.00 $6,725.00 $4,695.00 $214,398.00 $31,565.00
October $3,874.00 $11,687.00 $2,934.00 $201,328.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $214,398.00
November $8,777.00 $16,109.00 $12,660.00 $238,874.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $214,398.00
December $13.258.00 $27,618.00 $3,515.00 $283,265.00 December $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $214,398.00
Total $89,021.00 $133,708.00 $60,536.00 $283,265.00 Total $90,866.00 $84,836.00 $38,696.00 $214,398.00
Increasel(Decrease) $27,754.00 $6,542.00 ($2,731.00) $31,565.00
Y-T-D By Store
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: October 2002
Expenditures: Mean Average
83%
10/31/2002 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Spent Budget
Mayor/Council $56,300.00 $34,965.50 $21,334.50 62% 38%
Intergovernmental Relations $20,100.00 $20,512.90 -$412.90 102% -2%
Cable Franchise $19,900.00 $18,868.42 $1,031.58 95% 5%
General Management $86,600.00 $80,168.09 $6,431.91 93% 7%
Elections $24,400.00 $13,449.42 $10,950.58 55% 45%
Finance/Insurance $208,200.00 $149,916.62 $58,283.38 72% 28%
Finance/Assessing $39,100.00 $37,580.61 $1,519.39 96% 4%
Legal $69,800.00 $61,830.62 $7,969.38 89% 11%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,500.00 $997.95 $1,502.05 40% 60%
City Buildings $112,500.00 $66,377.78 $46,122.22 59% 41%
Civil Defense $43,700.00 $35,115.66 $8,584.34 80% 20%
Police Protection $1,061,200.00 $864,997.45 $196,202.55 82% 18%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $519,200.00 $431,850.30 $87,349.70 83% 17%
Fire Protection $555,900.00 $440,341.46 $115,558.54 79% 21%
Inspections/Building Permits $75,900.00 $46,375.51 $29,524.49 61% 39%
Animal Control $3,600.00 $2,001.67 $1,598.33 56% 44%
Public Works $395,200.00 $302,726.21 $92,473.79 77% 23%
Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $121,200.00 $81,152.02 $40,047.98 67% 33%
Tree and Weed Care $27,000.00 $18,950.14 $8,049.86 70% 30%
Parks $109,200.00 $103,387.48 $5,812.52 95% 5%
Transfers to other Funds $75,000.00 $56,250.00 $18,750.00 75% 25%
Budget Reserves/Non Budgeted $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0% 0%
Total Expenditures $3,626,500.00 $2,867,815.81 $758,684.19 79% 21%
Appropriation: $2,704,100.00
Hard Costs: 10/31/2002
Expenditures Balance
Central Park Construction-Veit �,: $, 661b,76 :1:3 $1,145,966.33 $515,795.80
City Hall Irrigation $28,100.00 $26,695.00 $1,405.00
Park Building-Thompson Homes $453,096.90 $134,394.60 $318,702.30
Central Park-Contingency 8 x' '
g y x$34,000 l)p $23,474.17 $10,525.83
Park Building Contingency $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
Total $2,201,959.03 $871,428.93
Silver Point Park
Building/Engineering
Soft costs:
URS-Planning&Design $269,050.00 $224,230.00 $44,820.00 Budget Expenditures Balance
SEH-Engineering/Planning $55,000.00 $52,169.35 $2,830.65 $25,700.00 $25,700.00 $0.00
Total $324,050.00 $47,650.65
Additional Hard Costs:
Common Excavation $9,520.00 $6,527.58 $2,992.42
Common Borrow $36,988.00 $25,482.66 $11,505.34
Contaminated Soil/Disposal $25,153.58 $17,323.18 $7,830.40
Soccer Goal Posts $3,000.00 $2,008.49 $991.51 Veit Construction Contract $1,661,762.13
Erosion Control Fence $4,674.25 $3,263.79 $1,410.46 Change Orders $158,630.83
Lab,Testing-Soils Analysis $1,500.00 $1,004.24 $495.76 $1,820,392.96
Environmental Field Supplies $295.00 $251.06 $43.94
Lead/Oil Drum Disposal $3,500.00 $2,385.08 $1,114.92 Budget:
Additional Lighting Foundation $30,000.00 $20,712.50 $9,287.50 Central Park/Veit EM
Practice Soccer Field $10,000.00 $6,904.17 $3,095.83 Contingency Total24;63083 $38,768.09 Additional/Hard Costs
$1,820,392.96
Additional Soft Costs:
STS Consultants-Soil Borings $6,646.00 $6,646.00 $0.00
STS-Construction Testing $5,000.00 $2,520.00 $2,480.00
URS-Environmental Services $13,500.00 $3,500.00 $10,000.00
Bond Issuance $23,881.54 $30,786.54 ($6,905.00)
Pollution Control $2,362.50 $2,572.50 ($210.00)
Advertisement for Bids $390.10 $641.40 ($251.30)
Maurice Anderson $1,680.00 $1,680.00 $0.00
Total $53,460.14 $5,113.70
Central Park Project-Totals $2,704,100.00 $1,741,138.63 $962,961.37
Stormwater Fund - Cash on Hand 10131/2002
Projeted
Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $3,000,000.00 $3,016,610.63
MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $935,008.45
DNR $5,440,000.00 $5,348,617.36
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Storm Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $509,645.42
Stone Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1,594,271.55
Total Project Budget $12,350,000.00 $12,254,153.41
Other Project Activity:
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement. $0.00 $5,060.75
HRA-Streetscape Transfer $0.00 $155,100.00
Met Council $20,000.00 $10,000.00
Stormwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $126,495.42
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
29th Avenue-Water Connection Fees $26,000.00 $26,400.00 .
Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work 0.00 $38.877.50
Total Revenues $12,677,000.00 $12,927,042.35
10/31/2002
Expenditures: Exaenditures4o-Date
WSB-Engineering Services $384,346.27
Bart-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $37,470.83
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025.00
Purchase of Flood Homes $1,199,681.26
Pahl Avenue Ponding $110,938.57
Flood Relief Grant Program $65,159.32
Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master $21,675.15
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,113,866.58
2000 Street Improvement Project $2,940,062.17
2001 Street Improvement Project $2,014,222.26
2002 Street Improvement Project $1,958,356.50
2003 Street Improvement Project $30,899.73
Harding Street Holding Ponds $895,634.63
Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1.560.254.71
Total Expenditures $12,337,548.97
Project Balance $589,493.38
Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $772,672.08
EXPENDITURE REPORT 10/3112002
WSB: Flood Relief Grant Program: 2001 Street Improvement Project
Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Expenditures Project Description:
Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennis/Penny Gault $10,000.00 WSB Engineering Services $250,445.97
Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00 Lillie Suburban Newspapers $38.75
Stormwater Task Force $29,243.00 Thomas/Susan Hoban $800.00 Hage Concrete Works $2,356.53
Stonnwater Engineering $54,842.23 Julie Sexton $1,004.53 Olson's Plumbing $221.90
- Flood Problem Analysis $31,497.23. Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00 Dickson Electric $453.00
MCES Grant Application $1,724.25 Castle Building 8 Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Sandness Construction $4,650.00
DNR/FEMA Grants $20,038.28 L.N.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00 Band Issuance $21,183.48
Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 Park Construction $1.735.872.63
Park Design $156,447.10 St.Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00 Total 2001 Street Project $2,015,222.26
III Study $31,765.50 RlteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00
Flood Grant-1998/1999/2000/2001 $30.982.25 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 2002 Street Improvement Project
Total WSB $384,346.27 Lamere Concrete-Flood Proofing Improvement $4,412.00 Project Description:
McCaren Designs,Inc. $703.99 WSB-Engineering Services $192,218.00
Barr Engineering: Minnehaha Falls Landscaping $5,587.50 Dorsey&Whitney $5,220.89
Project Description: Elgard Excavating Company $1,245.00 Construction Bulletin $215.16
District A6 Watershed Study $2,709-35 Twin Cities Glass Block $1,312.5 0 Moody's Investors Service $3,250.00
Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Total Flood Relief Program $65,159.32 Springsted,Inc. $13,217.86
Pipe Services Corp. $5,851.20
Dorsey&Whitney: Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master S.M.Hentges&Sons $1.738.383.39
Project Description: Project Description: Total 2002 Street Project $1,958,356.50
Legal Services for Flooding Issues $17,911.16 Waste Management $391.65
Legal Services-Comdenation of.Homes $16,120.25 Service Master $13,782.29 2003 Street Improvement Project
Legal Services-4029 Shamrock Drive $1,559.19 Nancy Myhran $259.50 Project Description:
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2,880.23 Linda Gonier $198.00 WSB-Engineering Services $23,510.35
Total Dorsey&Whitney $38,470.83 Susan Kozarek $925.00 STS Consultants $2,998.00
Elaine Nelson $1,065.00 Pipe Services Corp. $4,391.38
Water Quality Study: Sue Wenker $250.00 Total 2003 Street Project $30,899.73
Silver Lake: Richard Talbot $4,303.71
Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Berkley Risk/Insuance Claim-Payment $500,00 Harding Street Holding Ponds
Total Dumpsters $21,675.15 Project Description: Expenditures
Purchase of Homes: WSB-Engineering Services $105,888.05
Project Description: Sump Pump Beftendorf Rohrer $30,075.00
Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Project Description: Second Nature Lawn $241,974.07
Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00 Residential Easements $432,183.78
Demolition $9,156.00 UllieSuburbanNews-Advertisement $115.64 Dorsey&Whitney/Legal $31,400.27
Taxes $839.61 Total Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64 STS Consultants $3,235.00
Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 Evergreen Land Services $19,519.66
Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $365.00 1999 Street Improvement Project Construction Bulliten $358.48
Seat&Cap Well $1,450.00 Project Description: Albrecht,Inc. $20,215.22
Purchase of 2713 St Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 WSB-Engineering Services $174,398.02 Comdemnafion Commissioners $8,455.10
Demolition $11,258.00 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Old Republic-Abstract Fees $2,330.00
Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Northdale Construction $916,385.88 Total Harding Street Holding Ponds $895,634.63
Recording Deed/Taxes $2,506.98 Treemendous $460.00
Title Insurance $946.00 Dorsey&Whitney $2,911.55 Silver Point Park/Construction
Seal&Cap Well $1,420.00 Bond Issuance Expense $10.875.28 Project Description:
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 Total 1999 Street Project $1,113,866.58 Richard Knutson,Inc, $1,466,031.72
Purchase of 2700/2704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45 Sandness Construction $15,478.00
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $208,072.00 2000 Street Improvement Project Muska Electric $40,730.80
Purchase of 4029 Shamrock Drive $260,164.62 Project Description: Construction Bulletin $160.89
First American Title $375.00 WSB-Engineering Services $314,960.93 SEH,Inc-Silver Point Park Building $25.700.00
Forsythe Appraisals/Kozarek $350.00 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc. $2,293,303.47 WSB,Inc-Silver Point Park Building $672.00
Evergreen Land Services $3,369.47 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc.-Settlement of Dispute $66,067.84 Twin City Hydro Seeding $1,298.20
Total Purchase of Homes $1,199,681.26 E-CEL Energy $155,100.00 Trillium Park $10.183.10
Buchan Environmental Services $2,248.99 Total Silver Point Park $1,560,254.71
Pahl Avenue Ponding: Berkley Risk Services $10,000.00
Project Description: AIIState Insurance Company $312.78
WSB-Engineering Services $20,967.16 St Paul Companies $16,884.96
G&L Construction $69,998.42 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93
Treemendous $14,460.90 Albrecht,Inc. $891.75
Pipe Services $3,859.20 Fabyanske&Westra-Legal Cost/Ljtigation $40,915.29
Construction Bulliten $1,432.20 Bond Issuance Expense $39,143.23
Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $220.69 Total 2000 Street Project $2,940,062.17
Total Pahl Avenue Ponding $110,938.57
'n tho
illa e
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
LOCAL ELECTION CANVASSING BOARD MEETING
November 12, 2002
5:30 PM
City Hall
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. PRESENTATION OF NOVEMBER 5, 2002 REFERENDUM RESULTS
(approve results and certification of election results to the Counties).
IV. ADJOURNMENT.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
MINUTES OF CANVASS OF CITY ELECTION RESULTS
November 12, 2002
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM for the purpose of canvassing the
November 5, 2002 City Referendum results.
Present:
Absent:
The following report was presented to the Canvassing Board:
2002 ELECTION RESULTS
Precinct 1 H Precinct 2H Precinct Total
1R
Question 1
Yes 925 1466 851 3242
No 202 283 175 660
Question 2
Yes 809 1326 710 2845
No 319 419 313 1051
The total number of votes cast is
Motion by to approve and certify to Hennepin and Ramsey Counties
the City of St. Anthony election results of November 5, 2002.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by to adjourn the meeting at PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk
Minutes of Canvassing Board for
November 12, 2002 City Referendum
Page 2
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
CERTIFICATION