Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 10142003 Meeting Sheet IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII 102970 Box: 29 Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004 Document: CC PACKET 10142003 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure. CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA October 14, 2003 7:00 PM Council Chambers Call to Order. Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call. Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the Following Items: I. Approval of the October 14, 2003 City Council Meeting Agenda. Action requested. I1. Proclamations and Recognitions. III. Community Forum. Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk's record and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. IV. Consent Agenda. These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. A. Approve September 23, 2003 Council meeting minutes. (pp. 1 - 18) Approve October 2, 2003 Special Council meeting minutes. (pp. 19 -20) B. Licenses and permits. (p. 21) C. Claims. (pp. 22 - 26) D. Ordinance 2003-012, re: Water/sewer connection fees (3`d reading). (pp. 27 - 29) V. Public Hearings - None. VI. Reports From Commissions and Staff. A. Kay Andrews will make a presentation on the Northwest Youth & Family Services. (p. 30) B. Clarence Ranallo will report on the North Suburban Cable Commission. . t Page 2 VII. General Policy Business of the Council. A. Resolution 03-086, re: Award bid for construction of a Public Works facility. Action requested. (pp. 31) B. Resolution 03-087, re: Reject bids for construction of a Fire Station facility. Action requested. (pp. 32 - 38) C. Resolution 03-090, re: Endorsement of ISD #282 Referendum. Action requested. (pp. 39 -42)_ U. Resolution 03-088, re: Community Services funding. Action requested. (pp. 43 - 45) E. Ordinance 2003-013, re: Heating licenses (1" reading). Action requested. (pp. 46 -48) F. Ordinance 2003-014, re: Council meetings (1" reading). Action requested. (pp. 49 -51) VIII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers. A. Quarterly Progress Report on 2003 Goals. (p. 52) IX. Information and Announcements. X. Miscellaneous Informational Documents. XI. Adjournment. i - 1 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 07 September 23, 2003 Page 1 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2 3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 4 5 SEPTEMBER 23, 2003 6 7 CALL TO ORDER. 8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 9 10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 12 13 ROLL CALL. 14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust. 15 Absent: None. 16 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson and City Attorney Jerome Gilligan. 17 18 CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 19 ITEMS. 20 21 I. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 23, 2003, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 22 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the City Council Meeting Agenda of September 23 23, 2003. 24 25 Motion carried unanimously. 26 27 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS. 28 A. Proclamation for St. Anthony Kiwanis Peanut Day. 29 Councilmember Sparks read the proclamation designating Friday, September 26, 2003, as St. 30 Anthony Kiwanis Peanut Day in order to raise funds for its many and varied programs. 31 32 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to approve the proclamation designating Friday, September 33 26, 2003, as St. Anthony Kiwanis Peanut Day. 34 35 Councilmember Sparks asked for a demonstration and the Kiwanis members offered bags of 36 peanuts in exchange for donations. It was noted this was the Kiwanis' 32"d year of asking for 37 donations in St. Anthony Village. It was added young children were their first priority. 38 39 Motion carried unanimously. 40 41 III. COMMUNITY FORUM. 42 Pat Baker, 3223 Croft Drive, stated she had lived in the community approximately two years and 43 this was a community where many homes had been sold to young people with small families. 44 She indicated these were good homes in a good location that were selling for"top dollar." She 45 noted St. Anthony was an "up and coming"city; however, taxes had been increasing. 46 02 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 2 1 Ms. Baker referred to a newspaper article that discussed the City's redevelopment project and 2 asked why an"up and coming" community with a good location needed to spend so much 3 money to have someone come in to develop. She asked who was carrying the paper on the 4 property and felt, from reading the article, the City was giving the developers a tax break"on top 5 of it." 6 7 Ms. Baker indicated she was attending the meeting not only for herself but also for other people 8 who had been discussing these issues. She asked if anyone in the City Council was involved in 9 the bidding process, as that was a question she had been sent to ask. Councilmember Sparks 10 responded no one in the City Council was involved in the bidding process. 11 12 Ms. Baker quoted from the newspaper article and asked why taxpayers were being charged for 13 prime property. Mayor Hodson replied the funding for the redevelopment was extremely 14 complex and would be addressed later in the meeting. Ms. Baker indicated it should be 15 presented in a simplified form. 16 17 Fern Ostberg, 2704 Murray Avenue, stated she felt privileged to call St. Anthony Village her 18 home. She indicated the Work Force Housing Group was thrilled the developer was planning 19 rental units in the Apache Plaza area, as she felt work-force units should be available for lower 20 income families. She added this segment of the population was as interested in buying a home 21 as she had been when she bought her first home. 22 23 Ms. Ostberg indicated the development would be more attractive with less landscaping. She 24 added simplified roof lines and fewer cosmetic details would provide more money for the work- 25 force housing. She suggested"Big Box" supply some of the money as many of their employees 26 would come from this segment of the population. 27 28 Ms. Ostberg stated there was still time before final approval and she urged Council to include 29 some work-force housing that could be sold. 30 31 Mary Stevenson, 2912 Silver Lake Court, indicated she also was a part of the St. Anthony 32 housing group. She cited a young couple that had not been able to find comparable housing in 33 St. Anthony Village and had moved to the Coon Rapids area; which meant the loss of a nice 34 family and children for the school district. She stated affordable housing was a concern as the 35 City wanted to attract young families. 36 37 George Marks, 3424 Silver Lake Road, stated he had lived in St. Anthony Village for 32 years 38 and remembered when redevelopment was initiated for Apache Plaza. He gave a brief history of 39 Apache Plaza's "heyday" and the beginning and continuation of decline. He added the current 40 redevelopment plan, in his opinion, was in good condition with one possible exception. He 41 indicated concern that there was a proposal to bring in Wal-Mart, as he felt Wal-Mart had a 42 reputation for destroying the downtowns of cities. He stated he did not want to see Wal-Mart in 43 such an important part of the City, as it would not blend with the type of city St. Anthony has 44 been and still is. 45 46 Mr. Marks indicated he did not want to see any tax money used to help Wal-Mart. He stated he 47 did not want Council to allow that part of the plan to move forward and did not want any City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 03 September,23, 2003 Page 3 1 financing to aid Wal-Mart. He added taxing was an essential development tool and had been 2 used very profitably. He asked that past efforts not be besmirched by bringing Wal-Mart into the 3 City. 4 5 A St. Anthony resident who lives on 291h Avenue NE, felt the issues brought to Council were a 6 failure of the community to understand the details of the plan. He indicated a good job had not 7 been done explaining the financing and the needs of the community. He stated he understood 8 the needs of the community were being addressed; however,people were frustrated by this being 9 "thrown on them," as it was not what they wanted to see. He noted St. Anthony Village was 10 located on a fantastic site and Council needed to explain how the needs of the community were 11 being addressed. 12 13 IV. CONSENT AGENDA. 14 A. Approve September 9, 2003, Council meeting minutes. 15 B. Consider licenses and permits. 16 C. Consider payment of claims. 17 D. Consider Resolution 03-079, re: Amend North Suburban Mutual Aid. 18 E' Consider Resolution 03-078, re: Consider Election Judge list for 2003 Local Election. 19 F. Consider Ordinance 2003-012, re: Water and sewer connection permits (2nd reading). 20 21 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the Consent Agenda items. 22 23 Motion carried unanimously. 24 25 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF. 26 A. Planning Commission meeting—September 16, 2003. 27 1. Resolution 03-080, re: Northgate Condominium Owners/LeRoy Sign Company, 28 2500.Hi hway 88, setback variance. 29 Planning Commissioner Randy Stille noted Northgate Condominium Owner's Association had 30 submitted a three-foot setback variance from the roadway to allow for an identification ground 31 sign. He explained the applicant proposed a pylon sign for the front of their building in July, 32 along with other variance requests, and Council denied the application because it veered too far 33 from the City's sign ordinance. 34 35 Commissioner Stille stated the applicant was returning to the City with an application for a 36 ground sign and was asking for one variance for the three-foot setback variance from the 37 roadway to allow for a 12-foot setback. He added the variance request was necessary because 38 City ordinance stated ground signs must be located at least 15 feeffrom any street or other 39 easement. He explained the applicant stated this setback was from the east property line and was 40 necessary so the sign did not interfere with traffic flow. He noted City staff saw this as an 41 improvement to the site. 42 43 Commissioner Stille noted the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 44 2003, to consider the request. 45 46 It was noted the Planning Commission recommended Council approve said request due to 47 applicant's adherence to conditions 1 to 3 of the Petition for Sign Variance and noting the f City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 04 September 23, 2003 Page 4 1 hardship requirement was met due to the triangular shape of the lot. Staff also recommended 2 approval of the variance request, as the applicant had presented a ground sign that was 3 aesthetically pleasing and met City ordinance requirements. Staff suggested the following 4 condition: Prior to building permit approval, the applicant would submit a landscaping plan-for 5 the ground sign. 6 7 Councilmember Sparks asked if signage for the office front had been discussed. Commissioner 8 Stille responded he understood none was planned. It was noted the only sign planned was the 9 one from the street. 10 11 Commissioner Stille stated it was hard to determine the location of the sign by the provided 12 sketch. He explained the sign would be approximately two feet from the curb. 13 14 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to adopt Resolution 03-080 approving a variance for 15 Northgate Condominium Owner's Association at 2500 Highway 88 with stated condition. 16 17 Motion carried unanimously. 18 19 2. Resolution 03-073. re: St. Anthony Shopping Center, for 2900 Pentagon Drive; 20 amend Comprehensive Sim Plan. 21 Planning Commissioner Stille noted the St. Anthony Shopping Center recently signed leases 22 with two tenants that have regional and national scope: Bumper to Bumper and Subway. He 23 explained, according to the petitioner, the current Comprehensive Sign Plan did not provide 24 sufficient flexibility of sign design to accommodate regional and national tenants that had logo 25 signage for all their locations. 26 27 Commissioner Stille stated the St. Anthony Planning Commission considered a request by the 28 owners of the St. Anthony Shopping Center for an amendment to the Comprehensive Sign Plan 29 at a public hearing held on August 19, 2003. 30 31 Commissioner Stille indicated the petitioner's amendment request was to add the following to 32 the Plan: 33 1. The signage is in substantial conformance with tenant's internal sign criteria and 34 specifications. 35 2. The total width of the sign shall not exceed 80 percent of the tenant's storefront width. 36 3. The sign height shall be a minimum of 16 inches and maximum of 40 inches. 37 4. Sign color or colors are those found on typical retail signage in the Minneapolis/St. Paul 38 area. 39 5. Tenant submits two drawings for lessor's written approval prior to fabrication of the 40 signs. 41 6. Lessor approves tenant's sign contractor. 42 43 Commissioner Stille stated the St. Anthony Planning Commission recommended Council 44 approval of the following addition to the Plan at a public hearing held on September 16, 2003: 45 46 7. Lettering may be yellow in color. 47 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 0$ September 23, 2003 Page 5 1 Commissioner Stille indicated the Planning Commission did not feel a public hearing was a 2 good place to work out the details. He explained the deviation was considered due to sympathy 3 toward the new Subway tenant; therefore, the outcome was the Commission recommended 4 approval of adding yellow as a permitted color to the Plan. He added the Commission would 5 look at the Bumper-to-Bumper issues at a later date. 6 7 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adopt Resolution 03-073 approving an amendment to the 8 Comprehensive Sign Plan for the St. Anthony Stopping Center. 9 10 Discussion: 11 12 Councilmember Horst asked if the only item added was the color. Commissioner Stille 13 responded that was correct. 14 15 Councilmember Horst asked if item 1 listed in the resolution meant the petitioner,was planning 16 future signs to be in the same style as previous signs. Commissioner Stille responded it was his 17 understanding that the Subway sign was going to conform to the Plan in every way except the 18 color. 19 20 Councilmember Horst asked if the Subway logo would be internally lit separate letters. 21 Commissioner Stille responded that was his understanding. Councilmember Horst indicated he 22 did not have a problem with the request if only the color was being changed. 23 24 Councilmember Sparks asked if the existing language was used and the only change was 25 allowing yellow. Mr. Stille responded he believed that was correct. 26 27 Motion carried unanimously. 28 29 VI. NORTHWEST QUADRANT. 30 A. Resolution 03-081, re: Apache Redevelopment, LLC, for Northwest Quadrant area, 31 approval of the preliminary development plan and preliminaa plat for the entire project 32 area and the final development plan and final plat for the retail portion. 33 34 Planning Commissioner Stille noted the Planning Commission held a public hearing September 35 16, 2003, to discuss the Village at St. Anthony project. He indicated the impact of the project 36 was discussed, along with such issues as parking, affordable housing, traffic flow, lighting, 37 landscaping, drainage, signage, price points and project name. He stated the end result was to 38 approve the preliminary development plan and preliminary plat for the entire.project and the 39 final plan and final plat for the retail portion of the project. He added the Planning Commission 40 also recommended approval of Resolution 03-01 regarding modification to redevelopment plan 41 and tax increment financing plan for Northwest Quadrant redevelopment. He noted the 42 Commission findings were the proposed development of parcels within the TIF district 43 conformed to the City's comprehensive plan. 44 45 Commissioner Stille introduced John Shardlow of DSU. 46 06 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 6 1 Mayor Hodson stated he wanted to mention the task force started by 26 people approximately. 2 three years ago. He noted several of its members were present and noted the City would not,be 3 at the current stage with the Northwest redevelopment without the task force. Mayor Hodson 4 4 read the names of the members of the task force and indicated this was the group that started the 5 process, as they put together the criteria and listened to the residents around the project. Mayor 6 Hodson stated the City had a great team working on this project. 7 8 Mr. Shardlow indicated there had been a three-year planning process that was long, open and 9 deliberate. He noted information had been distributed through a community newsletter and on 10 the City's website and a large amount of input had been received regarding the process. He 11 added at least two major open houses had been held where the opportunity was given to submit 12 comments, which did shape the plan. 13 14 Mr. Shardlow stated he had 25 years experience working in this area and it was frustrating to get 15 questions from people who had not followed the process from the beginning. He added the only 16 thing that could be done was to explain as much as possible. 17 18 Mr. Shardlow noted the Northwest Quadrant Redevelopment Plan included a number of criteria 19 and goal statements when it was put together. He added each of the task force recommendations 20 to Council were cited and, in the team's opinion, every one of those had come back. He noted 21 all of the issues raised by residents had also received a response. 22 23 Mr. Shardlow explained the topic of discussion at the present meeting was land-use approval. 24 He stated the City approved land uses but did not have the authority to approve specific 25 businesses to occupy that land. He noted a planned unit development was currently before 26 Council, which enhanced the City's control before, during and after construction. 27 28 Mr. Shardlow discussed a layout of the plan from the Design Framework Manual. He indicated 29 the location of the retail portion of the project and stated the Planning Commission was 30 recommending final plan and fmal plat approval for that segment of the plan. He discussed the 31 importance of the park feature in the development and indicated amenities that would be 32 provided. 33 34 Mr. Shardlow also presented the illustrative site plan and indicated one of the main directives 35 was to open up the site area as there was a vast underuse of the center of the site. He stated a 36 high amenity roadway was needed. He noted there were three types of housing: rental 37 apartment units, urban townhomes or flats and the future side-by-side townhomes. 38 39 Mr. Shardlow indicate a planning report had been prepared which included findings of fact for 40 consideration by the Planning Commission. He stated the Planning Commission had accepted 41 each of the fmdings of fact and had incorporated them into the recommendation to Council. He 42 noted the recommendation to Council was to follow the Planning Commission recommendation 43 and approve the application for the Village at St. Anthony PUD Preliminary Development Plan 44 and Preliminary Plat, as well as the Final Development Plan and Final Plat of Subdivision for the 45 retail portion of the PUD, subject to the following conditions of approval: 46 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 07 September 23, 2003 Page 7 1 1. The PUD shall be developed in accordance with the following exhibits, which are 2 incorporated by reference to the Village at St. Anthony PUD: 3 a. PUD General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat Submission, dated August 8, 4 2003. 5 b. Design Framework Manual, dated August 19, 2003. 6 C. Final Development Plan Site Plan, dated September 3, 2003. 7 d. Final Development Plan Water main and Sanitary Sewer Plan, dated September 3, 8 2003. 9 e. Final Development Plan Storm Sewer Plan, dated September 3, 2003. 10 f. Final Development Plan Finish Grade Plan, dated September 3, 2003. 11 g. Final Landscape Plan, dated September 3, 2003. 12 h. Final Plat, dated September 3, 2003. 13 2. The PUD shall be developed in accordance with a Planned Unit Development Agreement 14 to be entered into by the City and the developer. Mr. Shardlow noted this would be a 15 binding contract with the applicant,which would indicate that the only way this property 16 could be developed was in accordance with the contract. .17 3. The developer shall provide an Erosion Control Plan, subject to review and approval by 18 the City Engineer, prior to recording the Final Plat. 19 4. The developer shall secure an NPDES Permit prior to recordation of the Final Plat. 20 5. The developer shall secure a Rice Creek Watershed District Permit prior to record the 21 Final Plat. 22 23 Mr. Shardlow explained this was a redevelopment project and the State statute that authorized 24 housing in redevelopment areas stated that a finding of blight was needed before authority was 25 used under the redevelopment plans. He noted a Northwest Redevelopment Area Blight 26 Analysis had been prepared, which he presented to Council. Discussion followed regarding the 27 information contained in the Analysis. 28 29 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to adopt Resolution 03-081 relating to the Northwest 30 Quadrant redevelopment project, approving the preliminary development plan and the 31 preliminary development plat for the entire project area and the final development plan and final 32 plat for the retail area. 33 34 Discussion: 35 36 City Attorney Gilligan indicated there should be one addition to the resolution. He requested the 37 following be added to the "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED"clause at the end of the 38 document: "and adopt findings of fact and conditions presented to Planning Commission by 39 DSU." 40 41 Councilmember Sparks asked if a level of maintenance could be specified in the PUD. Mr. 42 Shardlow responded a general statement could be included that indicated the owner needed to 43 maintain the property. Councilmember Sparks asked if wording was included in the current 44 PUD. Mr. Shardlow responded that document did not exist yet. He explained there were two 45 agreements: the Redevelopment Agreement and the PUD Agreement, which would be drafted as 46 a result of the action taken by Council with respect to zoning. He added all of the exhibits would 47 be incorporated by reference, along with the conditions of approval. He noted the current 08 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 8 1 meeting was a proper time to discuss specific maintenance issues to be incorporated. He 2 indicated a periodic review of the Agreement could be incorporated into the language. 3 4 Councilmember Horst asked if a TIF district could incorporate areas not considered blighted. ' 5 Mr. Shardlow responded this was not his area of expertise; however, he understood TIF 6 financing could be used if a certain percentage met the criteria. 7 8 Councilmember Sparks asked Mr. Shardlow to explain what should be expected of the PUD 9 process in the next few months. Mr. Shardlow responded the City Attorney, along with his 10 assistance, would prepare the PUD Agreement for Council's consideration. He indicated the 11 developers would continue to acquire additional properties and would seek final development 12 plan approval for other residential portions of the properties, at which time they would move 13 forward to develop it. He added the developers would then go forward with construction and 14 occupancy. Mr. Shardlow explained they were currently in a significant part of the PUD 15 process. 16 17 Motion carried unanimously. 18 19 A. Resolution 03-082, re: to modify the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project 20 Area No. 3, and to establish TIF District No. 3-5 within Redevelopment Project Area No. 21 3 and approve the removal of certain parcels from the HRH's TIF No. 3-3 for inclusion 22 into District No. 3-5 and to adopt a TIF plan therefor. 23 24 Mayor Hodson opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. 25 26 Sid Inman, Executive Vice President of Ehlers and Associates, noted the City was considering 27 establishing Tax Increment Financing District 3-5 to facilitate the redevelopment of the Apache 28 Plaza Shopping Center and surrounding area, commonly referred to as the Northwest Quadrant, 29 in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. He stated TIF District 3-5 consisted of 24 parcels 30 of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way and was approximately 65 acres in size. He 31 noted the duration of District 3-5 would be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first 32 increment, which would be approximately 2006; therefore, it was estimated the District, 33 including any modifications of the Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate 34 in 2031. 35 36 Mr. Inman noted four parcels to be included in District 3-5 were located within Apache TIF 37 District 3-3, a Redevelopment District created in 1993. These parcels were the following: pond 38 by Cub, pond behind mini-mall, vacant land between SAV H and Conoco and vacant land next 39 to Taco Bell. He noted the proposed action currently before Council requested approval of the 40 tax increment financing plan for District 3-5 and approval of the decertification of the foregoing 41 parcels from Apache TIF District 3-3 in order to include them in the newly created District 3-5. 42 43 Mr. Inman stated the Planning Commission reviewed the Plan on September 16, 2003, and the 44 Commission found the Development Plan for TIF District 3-5 was consistent with the City's 45 Comprehensive Plan. 46 09 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 9 1 Mr. Inman noted it was said this property was a prime piece of real estate. He indicated if that 2 were true it would have been developed and the City would not need to assist it. He explained 3 residents did not see the amount of revenue needed to develop this property and bringing in 4 retailers and homeowners was market driven according to what they were willing to pay. He 5 added the buildings would need to be purchased and torn down and there was a significant gap 6 on this piece of property, which the redevelopment process was trying to fill. He noted the 7 increased taxes from the redevelopment motivated this project, as this was a self-contained 8 project. 9 10 Mr. Inman indicated reduction of the tax district duration was contemplated if the project 11 proceeded better than anticipated. He stated the estimated annual tax increment was 12 approximately$2 million a year, assuming the development goes to full value, and 10% of that 13 amount could be used for administration so the City's general fund would not be used to pay any 14 expenses. He explained the form of financing proposed was pay-as-you-go, which meant that 15 once the gap referred to earlier was established it was the developer's obligation to finance that 16 gap. He noted the tax increment received would be used to repay the developer for taking on the 17 obligation. He added the district would disappear if something happened and the project did not 18 go forward. 19 20 Mike Fisher, LHB Architects, stated his firm had been hired by the City to make sure the TIF 21 district met statutes. He explained an inventory completed by LHB Architects concluded that 22 parcels consisting of 70% of the area in the district were occupied by buildings, streets, utilities 23 or other improvements. He noted LHB also conducted an interior and exterior inspection of all 24 the parcels/properties and concluded that more than 50% of the buildings in the district, not 25 including outbuildings, were structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation 26 or clearance, which meant the buildings could not be modified to satisfy the building code at a 27 cost of less than 15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and 28 type on the site. 29 30 Mr. Fisher continued to discuss the blight analysis and explain the formulas and numbers used to 31 reach the stated conclusions. 32 33 Councilmember Faust complimented Mr. Fisher on having done a very thorough analysis and 34 stated his analysis met the "but if for" scrutiny. He asked if Mr. Fisher felt the TIF requirements 35 were met for the City to move ahead. Mr. Fisher responded he was very confident the 36 requirements were met. 37 38 Councihnember Horst asked if there were potential problems in the future. Mr. Fisher replied 39 the analysis was completed after being physically present in the buildings. He added the 40 analysis used conservative findings. 41 42 Councilmember Horst asked regarding the source of the objections. City Attorney Gilligan 43 responded it could be coming from the State auditor or property owners. 44 45 Mr. Fisher stated an inspector was making the evaluation and he was the most senior architect in 46 the company. Mr. Fisher added he took the role as analyst. He noted the inspector was very 10 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 10 1 conservative and would not push too far. He reminded Council that, in this case, 72%of the . 2 buildings were found to be structurally substandard and met code deficiencies. 3 4 Mr. Gilligan explained Council was finding the district met the requirements by approving the 5 TIF plan and the report served as a basis to vote for the resolution. 6 7 Councilmember Thuesen stated he was encouraged that the City"would be covered"; however, 8 he indicated it was discouraging there was so much blighted property in the area. He added it 9 was good something was finally being done. 10 11 Mayor Hodson asked if any residents wished to address Council at this time. 12 13 Dennis Cavanaugh, 2909 St. Anthony Boulevard, stated he wished to thank those involved for 14 all the work they had done and he stated the project had been open to the residents. He indicated 15 Apache Plaza should probably never have been built and he had seen a lot of proposals come and 16 go. He complimented Mr. Shardlow and Ehlers and Associates, as he felt they had done the 17 most thorough planning in the history of the City's property development. He noted this project 18 had taken a long time to happen and he agreed it was a difficult piece of land to develop. He 19 stated he admired the people who had tackled it. 20 21 Mr. Cavanaugh stated he understood how a marriage of retail and housing was needed for 22 economics. He noted it was difficult to stay in the first-ring suburbs and find affordable housing. 23 He added there were seniors who wished to move out of their homes into something they could 24 afford. He noted affordable housing only stayed affordable for one cycle and he felt this was an 25 important issue, as the residents wished to have a diverse community. 26 27 Mr. Cavanaugh commented on the criticism of Wal-Mart. He stated we are now in globalization 28 and the "Big Box" seemed to be the direction retail was taking. He felt Wal-Mart would benefit 29 . the community, as it would expand the economic choices available. 30 31 Mr. Cavanaugh noted TIF was the economics of doing redevelopment, although it had been 32 weakened by property tax reform. He stated this property needed help and TIF was what was 33 available. He restated if the housing development had affordable components it would be good 34 for the community. He applauded those involved for tackling a tough project and stated they 35 would not be able to please everybody. He commended the staff, developer and consultants for 36 doing an excellent job and asked them to "stay the course." 37 38 Jake Cadwallader, 3800 Apache Lane, stated he wished to ask a question that had been 39 addressed to the Planning Commission and City Attorney and was never answered. *He noted 40 action had been taken to rezone and plat his property; however, the application required he sign 41 it. He stated he never signed the application; therefore, the City took action on property he 42 owned without his approval. 43 44 Mr. Cadwallader also had questions regarding the redevelopment district. He noted the 45 redevelopment district had been established as a large parcel for quite some time and, at recent 46 meetings, some of the parcels had been included in the district and others excluded. He asked 47 why the US Bank building was removed from the TIF district, for example, as they were well 11 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 11 1 within the district. He noted Erickson's and Video Update had been removed. He also asked 2 regarding the status of the Equinox Apartments. 3 4 Mr. Cadwallader indicated he felt the City had picked and chosen who would be included and 5 excluded. He asked if US Bank had indicated they did not want to be part of the district and, 6 therefore, they were not part of it. He stated he did not want to be part of the district; however, 7 he had not been given a choice. He added his property had been rezoned and replatted before a 8 TIF district had been established. He asked why the City was taking these actions without 9 authority to do so. 10 11 Mr. Cadwallader agreed this had been a long, complicated process and asked why there was a 12 rush at this point in the process. He felt actions were being taken without a proper foundation, 13 even though he agreed the actions might be doable. Mr. Cadwallader asked that all of the 14 process be completed prior to taking action. 15 16 Bruce Malkerson, Malkerson Gilliland Martin LLP, noted he was the attorney representing Pratt- 17 Ordway, Inc. He stated he had a question regarding Resolution 03-082. He suggested the 18 following reports be added to paragraph 1.04,which referred to "certain written reports relating 19 to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein": NW Area Quadrant Plan and the update 20 of that plan, summary of inspections of findings by LHB Architects, full report of inspection 21 procedures and results for determining the qualification of the TIF district and building code and 22 conditions deficiencies report. He felt these reports should be included because they were part 23 of the overall study of the district. 24 25 Mr. Gilligan stated he agreed with Mr. Malkerson and indicated the third sentence in paragraph 26 1.04 should read as follows: These reports include the Summary of the Inspections and Findings 27 prepared by LHB, the Environmental and Asbestos Reports prepared by Braun Intertec, the NW 28 Quadrant Task Force Report and the NW Redevelopment Area Blight Analysis prepared by 29 DSU. 30 31 Mr. Malkerson indicated Stacie Kvilvang of Ehlers and Associates might also have a 32 presentation on blighting conditions in the area and asked if that should also be included. Mr. 33 Gilligan responded he was not aware of such a report. 34 35 Peter Beck stated he represented the owners and managers of the Apache Medical Building. He 36 indicated they had been concerned earlier in the process when the medical building had been 37 included in the potential PUD and were now pleased to see it was not a part of the PUD. He 38 stated the owners and managers of the Apache Medical Building would like confirmation that 39 the building was not included and access would not be closed to 39`h Avenue. 40 41 Mr. Beck explained the owners of the building were planning to renovate and reposition the 42 building in exciting ways. He noted it was understood the building was also in the TIF district, 43 which was more of a concern. He added, if the decision was made to make the investment in the 44 property, the primary concepts being pursued would require some measure of assistance. He 45 stated the owners would like to clarify that the intent of the building being in the TIF district 46 would not be that any investment made would generate TIF for the PUD but would be increment 12 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 12 1 that could potentially be used to redevelop the Apache Medical Building,which he understood 2 also met the criteria.. 3 4 Mr. Inman responded comment could not be made on future actions, as the current proposal only 5 involved tax increment generated from the particular parcels considered in the two phases. 6 7 Mr. Beck indicated they were not asking for a commitment but were asking that whatever came 8 to them did not go elsewhere. He stated they could move ahead with their own plans if there was 9 no intent to acquire the property. He added they were supportive of what had been put together, 10 as success of the redevelopment project was positive for the medical building. 11 12 Ms. Baker asked if money was being allocated to buy out and condemn apartments, which would 13 displace tenants. Mayor Hodson responded condemning of apartments was not planned. 14 Discussion followed regarding buildings that would be affected. 15 16 Ms. Baker asked who was going to take responsibility for the park property. Councilmember 17 Horst responded that would be included in the Redevelopment Agreement that would be 18 formulated after the current process. 19 20 Ms. Baker stated she understood the contractor would be carrying"his own paper," receive the 21 tax breaks and make a profit when selling the property. Councilmember Horst explained there 22 was a 26-year time period to pay the developer the money he had loaned to himself. He added 23 there were no tax breaks involved and that this was a"good deal" for the City. 24 25 Ms. Baker indicated she wanted to see some of the profit come back to the City in the form of 26 taxes. She asked if the contractor would pay full tax as she must pay on her home. 27 Councilmember Thuesen responded it was not uncommon for these types of projects to come 28 onto the tax roles sooner than planned. Discussion followed. It was noted Ms. Kvilvang from 29 Ehlers and Associates would address this issue further. 30 31 Mr. Cadwallader stated he had not received any answers to his questions. Mr. Gilligan 32 responded there was no final zoning approval on the property. He added there was no 33 recommendation for the owner's signature on the preliminary approval; however, it was needed 34 with the final approval. Discussion followed regarding the developer's ability to apply for 35 redevelopment of Mr. Cadwallader's property. 36 37 There was further discussion regarding the reasons why some properties were included and 38 others excluded from the district. Mr. Gilligan explained the included properties were properties 39 where development was likely to occur. 40 41 Mr. Cadwallader asked why the US Bank building was excluded. Mr. Gilligan replied there was 42 no development planned for that property. 43 44 Mr. Malkerson noted the US Bank building was in another TIF district and was not being 45 decertified for placement in the new district. It was noted Mr. Malkerson was correct. 46 47 Mayor Hodson closed the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. 13 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 13 1 Motion by Councilmember Horst to adopt Resolution 03-082 adopting a modification to the 2 Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3; and establishing Tax Increment 3 Financing District No. 3-5 within Redevelopment Project Area No. 3 and approving the removal 4 of certain parcels from the HRH's Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-3 for inclusion in 5 District No. 3-5 and adopting a Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor, with the inclusion of 6 earlier stated reports in Section 1.04 as recommended by the City Attorney. 7 8 Motion carried unanimously. 9 10 C. Resolution 03-085, re: Redevelopment of property in Redevelopment Project Area No. 3 11 and authorizing preparation, execution and delivery of a contract for private development 12 thereof. 13 14 Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., noted this redevelopment process was started two 15 years ago. She gave a history of how those involved in the project came together. She also 16 discussed why development of this project area was necessary for the health of the City. She 17 noted the costs of not redeveloping were loss in the tax base, loss in jobs and areas within the 18 City would start to decline generating increased public safety issues and a negative perception, 19 which would make it hard to attract people to the area. 20 21 Ms. Kvilvang also discussed the history of Apache Plaza while giving a slide presentation, which 22 showed pictures of Apache Plaza in the past and also of Apache Plaza's current state. She also 23 explained the reasons why Apache Plaza suffered its decline. 24 25 Ms. Kvilvang explained the proposed Development Agreement looked at two phases. She stated 26 Phase I consisted of constructing 223,000 square feet of retail space. She added the housing 27 development would include 220 rental units and two phases of for-sale housing, with 128 units 28 being built in each phase. She noted the for-sale housing would have sale price values from 29 $160,000 to $400,000 and the rental unit rates would be$900 to $1,600 per month, which did 30 not include the affordable rent amounts. 31 32 Ms. Kvilvang indicated Phase IIA would consist of 80 units of senior housing; IIB, 26 higher- 33 end townhomes; HC, the urban flats. She noted it appeared the timing of these developments 34 was to begin construction in 2004 and finish in 2007,which she stated might be slightly 35 aggressive. She anticipated the commercial component would be starting immediately and 36 added the Development Agreement would include desired start dates, along with default dates. 37 She explained the default date was usually kept at approximately six months and, if the 38 development had not begun by that date, the City would have the opportunity to seek another 39 developer. 40 41 Ms. Kvilvang discussed the following timeline: Phase I commercial, begin 2004/finish 2005; 42 Phase I apartments, begin Fall 2004/finish 2006; Phase IA for-sale flats, begin Fall 2004/finish 43 2006; Phase IB flats,begin Fall 2005/finish 2007; Phase IIA senior component, begin Fall 44 2005/finish 2007; Phase IIB townhomes, begin Fall 2005/finish 2007; IIC flats, begin Fall 45 2006/finish 2007. 46 14 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 14 1 Ms. Kvilvang noted financing for Phase I had been discussed over the last few meetings. She 2 explained a detailed analysis was completed, which looked at development performance, land 3 prices, construction costs and standards. She added the tax increment financing was going 4 toward"qualified costs,"which were statutory costs such as land acquisition, demolition, 5 environmental issues, relocation, etc. 6 7 Ms. Kvilvang stated one of the questions asked was why public assistance should be provided. 8 She indicated the assistance was needed and warranted. She added this site would have been 9 developed many years ago if it were "such a great site." She indicated Council wanted this 10 development to be successful, as it would increase values, say good things about the community 11 and provide the opportunity for the district to end earlier than planned. 12 13 Ms. Kvilvang explained and detailed the money sources and costs for the components of Phase I. 14 She noted the for-sale urban flats would be paying an average of$10,000 per unit; however, it 15 was divided among the two phases to allow the initial phase to pay less for land up front to allow 16 the developer the flexibility to address any market issues and legal, financing and design issues 17 occurring disproportionately in the first phase. 18 19 Ms. Kvilvang stated 39`h Avenue would be reconstructed from Silver Lake Road to Stinson 20 Boulevard and upgrades would be made to the sanitary sewer lines as well. She anticipated it 21 would cost approximately$2.205 million to complete these improvements and the cost would be 22 assessed to and paid for by the development and other benefitting properties within the TIF 23 district. 24 25 Ms. Kvilvang explained the redeveloper would pay for the open space/ponding and site 26 improvements, which were estimated to cost approximately$1.43 million. She stated the City 27 and HRA would reimburse them for a portion or all of the site/ponding improvements through 28 Park Dedication Fees generated from the development, which were estimated at$205,000, any 29 grants the City might receive and from tax increment. She added the site improvements might 30 be phased over a three-year period if the City did not receive the $900,000 in LCDA funds it 31 requested from the Metropolitan Council. She noted phasing of the site improvements would 32 allow the development team to pay for the improvements as cash became available. She 33 indicated $325,000 of the cost had not yet been identified. 34 35 Ms. Kvilvang noted the redeveloper would construct and furnish a new municipal liquor store 36 within the commercial development. She anticipated the liquor store would be constructed prior 37 to demolition of the existing store, causing minimal disruption to the City's liquor operation. 38 She added the City would work with Tires Plus to find a suitable location for their business. She 39 noted the redeveloper would pay the cost to relocate the existing Tires Plus building and the cost 40 to construct the new liquor store, up to an amount not to exceed $1.7 million. 41 42 Ms. Kvilvang indicated the redeveloper had a signed purchase agreement for the existing Cub 43 Foods store for$10.85 million, inclusive of the restrictive property covenants. She stated the 44 redeveloper intended to rehabilitate the store to upgrade its appearance to the quality of the new 45 commercial development at an estimated cost of$580,000. 46 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 15 September 23, 2003 Page 15 1 Ms. Kvilvang explained the redeveloper had requested assistance in acquiring the three 2 commercial properties upon which the Phase IA for-sale housing units would be located. She 3 stated the development team held discussions with Fannie Mae to assist in providing the "up 4 front"money needed to acquire these properties and Fannie Mae was willing to provide this 5 assistance but would require, as collateral, the land, Developer Guarantee and a pledge of funds 6 from the City. She anticipated the City would utilize funds from the water filtration fund as 7 collateral for the loan and would not be required to provide its general obligation taxing 8 authority. She noted the terms of the collateral were still being discussed with Fannie Mae and 9 terms of a revolving fund for future property acquisitions were still being discussed with the 10 redeveloper. She added any final loan agreement would be brought before Council and the HRA 11 for approval. 12 13 Ms. Kvilvang indicated the developer of the for-sale housing units anticipated a 12%profit on 14 the development. She explained, once the developer obtained this profit margin, they would 15 provide a prorated "pay back"to the City and HRA of 25% of the excess profit. She added the 16 City and HRA's prorated share of the profit would be increased by 50% if the project profit 17 exceeded 15%. She noted the profit calculations excluded any unit"upgrades"requested by 18 homeowners. 19 20 Ms. Kvilvang stated, provided the for-sale developer was not in default, in the event the return to 21 the for-sale developer was less than 12%, the City and HRA would provide the for-sale 22 developer a subordinated pay-as-you-go (PAYG) tax increment note in the amount needed to 23 attain a 12% return. 24 25 Ms. Kvilvang indicated mutually agreed-upon preliminary development proformas for the for- 26 sale housing and commercial development would be attached as an exhibit to the Development 27 Agreement. She explained this would be the basis for determination of assistance for the 28 developments and,when the developments were completed, the actual development proformas 29 would be compared with the preliminary develop proformas. She noted the excess proceeds 30 would be disbursed to the City and HRA as excess TIF and would be made available for Phase H 31 developments within the TIF district if the projects performed better than anticipated, the for- 32 sale developer received their required profit amount of 12% and the commercial developer met 33 their construction and lease goals. 34 35 Ms. Kvilvang noted the City and HRA would enter into a separate redevelopment contract with 36 the rental housing developer. 37 38 Ms. Kvilvang indicated the redeveloper would utilize reasonable efforts to acquire all property 39 privately prior to requesting the City to initiate condemnation, including use, where appropriate, 40 of City-sponsored mediation. She noted the City would agree to undertake condemnation of all 41 real properties located within the redevelopment district that would restrict redevelopment as 42 contemplated. She explained all costs of condemnation proceedings would be paid by the 43 redeveloper, subject to reimbursement of certain costs as a public redevelopment cost from tax 44 increment in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement. 45 46 Ms. Kvilvang stated the redeveloper had reimbursed, and agreed to do so in the future, the City 47 and HRA for all costs of the City and Authority in advancement of the project, including but not ' City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 16 September 23, 2003 Page 16 . 1 limited to the costs of the City consultants, financial analysis of the project and tax increment 2 plan, redevelopment and TIF district analysis and creation, legal fees, survey and title costs, 3 environmental review costs, environmental site investigation costs, etc. She noted the 4 redeveloper would be reimbursed for these costs and costs associated with acquiring and holding 5 the Apache Plaza property and other overhead as a qualified tax increment cost in an amount 6 currently estimated to be $2.645 million. 7 8 Ms. Kvilvang explained any cost savings by the redeveloper on negotiating the purchase, non- 9 statutory relocation payments and demolition of the three commercial properties for the Phase lA 10 for-sale housing component would be used to first cover any overruns in any other redeveloper 11 category and 50% of the remainder would be paid to the redeveloper and 50%made available to 12 the City and HRA for other public redevelopment costs. She noted the incentive fee would not 13 be payable to the redeveloper if they were in default under the Redevelopment Contract. 14 15 Ms. Kvilvang stated the City and HRA would provide the redeveloper with the$586,000 grant it 16 received from the Metropolitan Council for asbestos abatement at Apache Plaza. She added the 17 City and HRA would use its best efforts to obtain LCDA and tax-base revitalization grant 18 funding, in addition to any other available funding from Metropolitan, State and Federal 19 Sources. 20 21 Ms. Kvilvang indicated the master redeveloper would be paid a$1 million fee for the Phase I 22 development at the time of the closing of the land sale to each project element. She noted the 23 timing and conditions attached to payment of the fee. 24 25 Ms. Kvilvang explained the redeveloper may create and assign its development rights and the 26 right to enter into the Redevelopment Contract to a single-purpose entity to undertake the 27 project, without the consent of the City and HRA,provided Len Pratt and John Ordway continue 28 to hold a majority voting interest in the new entity. She added the redeveloper might thereafter 29 assign portions of the rights and obligations under the Redevelopment Contract to the 30 commercial,rental and for-sale developers, with the consent of the City and HRA,which would 31 not be unreasonably withheld. 32 33 Councilmember Sparks stated it was important to remind residents this information had been 34 given multiple times. 35 36 Ms. Kvilvang anticipated the Development Agreement would be brought to Council sometime in 37 October and noted it may require a special meeting. She added this was a great development for 38 the City, as it was physically prudent and met the overall redevelopment goals of the City. 39 40 Mayor Hodson noted this had been a partnership between residents, Council, development team, 41 staff, consultants and experts. He added everyone had worked well together to make this 42 happen. 43 44 Motion by Councilmember Horst to adopt Resolution 03-085 relating to the redevelopment of 45 property in Redevelopment Project Area No. 3 and authorizing the preparation, execution and 46 delivery of a contract for private redevelopment thereof. 47 17 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2003 Page 17 1 Discussion: 2 3 Councilmember Faust noted it had been a long process to get to this point. He stated it had been 4 tedious and detail oriented; however, he felt the City had a good financial package and the 5 developers felt the situation was a win/win for them and the community. He added not many 6 redevelopments of this size happened in communities the size of St. Anthony Village. He 7 indicated there had been enough due diligence with the developers to be assured the project 8 would stand the test of time and was reasonable and prudent. 9 10 Councilmember Thuesen stated a lot of information had been received over the months and 11 years and he was comfortable with the results, as there were many knowledgeable people 12 working toward the same goal. He noted the process had been careful not to financially 13 compromise residents or future residents. 14 15 Motion carried unanimously. 16 17 Mr. Pratt came forward and stated he felt humbled once again that the City had selected him 18 some 18 months ago. He noted he knew things would need to be solved as the project moved 19 forward. He indicated he had kept three things in mind: the need to listen to residents and 20 consultants, the need to keep the resulting quality development in mind and the need to treat 21 change with respect. Mr. Pratt thanked those involved who had been helpful moving the project 22 to this point. 23 24 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. 25 A. Resolution 03-083 re: $585,000 GO Refunding,Bonds Series 2003D, authorizing 26 issuance, awarding sale, fixing form, etc. 27 B. Resolution 03-084, re: $1,170,000 Taxable GO Tax Increment Refunding Bonds Series 28 2003E, authorizing issuance, awarding sale, fixing form, etc. 29 30 Mr. Inman stated the City was selling two refunding bonds. He explained these bonds were not 31 a new money issue and did not create any new obligation but were simply sold for the refunding. 32 33 Mr. Inman reviewed the bids received for the $1,170,000 Taxable General Obligation Tax 34 Increment Refunding Bonds Series 2003E and noted Cronin and Company, Inc., was the lowest 35 responsible bidder with a true interest rate of 4.4679%. He recommended Cronin and Company, 36 Inc.,be accepted as the successful bidder. 37 38 Motion by Councilmember Faust to adopt Resolution 03-084 approving Cronin and Company, 39 Inc., as the successful bidder for the $1,170,000 Taxable GO Tax Increment Refunding Bonds 40 Series 2003E with a true interest rate of 4.4679%. 41 42 Motion carried unanimously. 43 44 Mr. Inman reviewed the bids received for the $585,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds 45 Series 2003D and noted UMB Bank, N.A., Kansas City, Missouri,was the lowest responsible 46 bidder with a true interest rate of 2.6436%. He recommended UMB Bank, N.A., Kansas City, 47 Missouri, be accepted as the successful bidder. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 18 September 23, 2003 Page 18 1 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adopt Resolution 03-083 approving UMB Bank,N.A., 2 Kansas City, Missouri, as the successful bidder for the $585,000 General Obligation Refunding 3 Bonds Series 2003D with a true interest rate of 2.6436%. 4 5 Motion carried unanimously. 6 7 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS. 8 City Manager Momson stated he had no report. 9 10 Councilmember Horst stated he had no report. 11 12 Councilmember Sparks stated she had no report. 13 14 Councilmember Thuesen noted the St. Anthony Lions Club had been allowed to stand on some 15 street corners last weekend to raise money for White Cane Days. He explained the money raised 16 would go to the local eye bank and projects like training dogs for sight-impaired persons. He 17 thanked the City for allowing the Lions Club to raise the money. 18 19 Councilmember Faust noted he had asked to be given the authority to go to the Minnesota 20 Department of Revenue to attend the meeting discussing local sales tax options. He stated a 21 reporter from the Sun Focus who attended the last Council meeting asked if she could 22 accompany him to the meeting. He noted her article should be in Thursday's Sun Focus. He 23 explained the Department of Revenue was charged by the State Legislature to take input from 24 cities regarding local sales taxes and the implications involved. He stated there was a loud and 25 clear message from the counties and cities to "do no harm." He noted there was an editorial in 26 the September 23, 2003, issue of the Star Tribune, which addressed the issue. He also indicated 27 looking forward to the Sun Focus article. 28 29 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 30 None. 31 32 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS. 33 None. 34 35 XI. ADJOURNMENT. 36 Motion by Councilmember Horst to adjourn the meeting at 9:42 p.m. 37 38 Motion carried unanimously. 39 40 Respectfully submitted, 41 42 Marjorie R. Jenkins 43 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 44 45 Mayor 46 ATTEST: 47 City Clerk 19 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE r CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING ` THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2003 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 5:04 p.m. ROLL CALL. Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust. Absent: None. Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson. II. Consider Resolution 03-086, re: Consider Bid Package for the Public Works Construction Project (Bid Package#2). Gary Benson, Kraus-Anderson, indicated that both construction sites are underway. Last week the bids for completion of the two projects were submitted. As a result of these bids, Public Works Facility was over by$269,000 and Fire Station by$482,000. In addition to the overage of the bids,we have $150,000 in unsuitable and contaminated soils at the Public Works Facility. Last week Kraus Anderson, Oertel Architects, and Staff Members met and performed some value engineering and cost reductions. The"team"came up with the following: Public Works Facility—on budget except the soil correction costs. Fire Station—Over budget by$250,000. Kraus Anderson proposed three options. Option 1 Approve Public Works bids and appropriate additional funding of$150,000 for unsuitable soils correction. Redesign and re-bid the Fire Station to meet the original budget. This option requires a total project budget of$5,680,000. Option 2 Public Works employ further value engineering/cost reductions to fund the $250,000 overage at the Fire Station. This option would still require the additional $150,000 for unsuitable soils. Total budget for this option would be $5,680,000. Option 3 Approve Public Works and Fire Station bids and appropriate additional funding of$150,000 for the unsuitable soils, with an additional appropriation of$250,000 to fund the Fire Station. Total budget for this option would be $5,930,000. Jeff Oertel, Oertel Architects, indicated there were six soil borings performed on the Public Works site. He indicated that this is not a clean site. He presented three site plans for the Public 2® Works Facility. The current site plan would bring the Public Works Facility in on budget excluding funding the soil contamination costs. III. Resolution 03-086,re: Consider Bid Package for the Fire Station Construction Project(Bid Package #2). Jeff Oertel, Oertel Architects,presented four diagrams for the Fire Station. He stated because of the site location the council originally indicated they wanted an aesthetically beautiful building. He indicated that the square footage of the building increased and the aesthetics of the building increased. Gary Benson, Kraus Anderson, indicated that the budget lost meaning in the design phase. Joel Hewitt, Fire Chief,presented that the new fire station is approximately 13,800 square feet with 3 bays, training facilities, and dorm rooms. He indicated that he believed that he bids would be under budget. After considerable discussion, Hodson indicated to the"team"the need to go back and re-design these buildings and bring them back to the Council in budget. Also in this process it is important to consider the Public Works and Fire Station budgets separately. After discussion, Faust made a motion to table the resolutions until the October 14`", Council Meeting. Seconded by Thuesen. Motion carried unanimously. VI. Other Business. None. V. Adjournment. Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 6:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barb Suciu Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 21 Saint Anthony Village DATE: October 14, 2003 Approved: TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk ITEM: License and Permits for Approval: Contractors License Streiff Construction Services, Faribault, MN Amcon Construction, Burnsville, MN Electro Neon &Design, Blaine, MN Gunderson Brother Cement Contractors, Minneapolis, MN Pioneer Tree &Landscape Inc., Pierz, MN Zeman Construction Co, Golden Valley, MN Heating License Dave's Appliance, Columbia Heights, MN Cronstrom's Heating and Air Conditioning, St. Louis Park, MN Carlson Partners Group, LLC dba: Sterling Design, St. Croix Falls,MN ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 10/08/2003 08: Check Register GL540R-V06.55 PAGE 1 BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT FIRS BREMER BANK NA 000020 AA BATTERY CO 20944 10/15/03 776.65 008242 AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERV 20945 10/15/03 843.85 008268 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 20946 10/15/03 75.00 005201 AMERICAN STORES 20947 10/15/03 66.86 008450 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, 20948 10/15/03 227.38 005216 ANOKA TECHNICAL INSTITUT 20949 10/15/03 125.00 008909 ARCH WIRELESS 20950 10/15/03 21.81 008511 AT&T WIRELESS 20951 10/15/03 9.87 008255 AVAYA, INC. 20952 10/15/03 29.32 008555 BIFFS, INC. 20953 10/15/03 547.64 007168 BOYER FORD TRUCKS, INC. 20954 10/15/03 289.70 007253 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO 20955 10/15/03 62.78 008916 CANADA GOOSE PROGRAM 20956 .10/15/03 1,575.00 008652 CARTRIDGE CARE 20957 10/15/03 231.16 007386 CASTLE INSPECTION SERVIC 20958 10/15/03 4,392.05 002380 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNE 20959 10/15/03 963.38 004065 CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO 20960 10/15/03 24.28 008577 CITY OF ST. PAUL 20961 10/15/03 190.77 004107 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLN 20962 10/15/03 4,169.48 008736 CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT 20963 10/15/03 542.62 008966 CULVERS 20964 10/15/03 76.00 000785 DALCO 20965 10/15/03 277.29 007371 DISCOUNT STEEL, INC. 20966 10/15/03 41.51 000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 20967 10/15/03 5,254.70 008921 DYNAMEX 20968 10/15/03 22.44 008666 EASYLINK SERVICES CORPOR 20969 10/15/03 101.50 008698 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC 20970 10/15/03 35,315.00 008153 FILTERFRSH 20971 10/15/03 57.73 008221 FOSTER,WENTZELL,HEDBACK, 20972 10/15/03 5,000.00 008647 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 20973 10/15/03 147.25 001030 G & K SERVICES INC 20974 10/15/03 578.29 001145 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 20975 10/15/03 47.93 001180 GOODIN COMPANY 20976 10/15/03 10.42 001250 GRAINGER INC/W W 20977 10/15/03 18.48 008709 HALL/SUSAN M.H. 20978 10/15/03 295.55 001420 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 20979 10/15/03 191.97 008944 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT 20980 10/15/03 1,064.62 005017 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 20981 10/15/03 36,655.93 008987 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE 20982 10/15/03 234.00 008699 HEWITT/JOEL 20983 10/15/03 39.37 005103 HOLIDAY SIGNS 20984 10/15/03 75.00 008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 20985 10/15/03 258.64 001545 HOOVER WHEEL ALIGNMENT 20986 10/15/03 34.95 001580 HYDRAULIC SPECIALITY CO 20987 10/15/03 294.04 008658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I 20988 10/15/03 679.70 .00002 INTERSTATE COMPANIES, IN 20989 10/15/03 954.94 .00001 JULEEN DESIGNS, INC. 20990 10/15/03 291.25 007352 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 20991 10/15/03 57.45 N ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 10/08/2003 08: Check Register GL540R-VO6.55 PAGE 2 BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT FIRS BREMER BANK NA 008434 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI 20992 10/15/03 20.00 001980 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 20993 10/15/03 5,490.00 008989 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL 20994 10/15/03 309.75 008229 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 20995 10/15/03 498.91 002100 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT CO 20996 10/15/03 410.02 008855 MACRO GROUP, INC. 20997 10/15/03 80.00 008263 MCLEOD USA, INC. 20998 10/15/03 1,904.30 00.8279 METRO COUNCIL ENVIR SERV 20999 10/15/03 1,262.25 007835 METROCALL 21000 10/15/03 238.72 002240 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 21001 10/15/03 43,281.33 008467 MIDWAY FORD 21002 10/15/03 21.92 007340 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT 21003 10/15/03 500.00 008766 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL H 21004 10/15/03 594.00 008269 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 21005 10/15/03 54.95 008280 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURE 21006 10/15/03 914.60 00001 MULCAHY, INC. 21007 10/15/03 198.00 007370 MYERS. TIRE SUPPLY COMPAN 21008 10/15/03 7.70 007159 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21009 10/15/03 16.58 008820 NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY, 21010 10/15/03 59.64 008601 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER 21011 10/15/03 50.00 008988 NOVACARE CBO 21012 10/15/03 75.00 000045 OFFICE DEPOT 21013 10/15/03 923.80 007366 PARTS MIDWEST, INC. 21014 10/15/03 57.89 008594 PETERBILT NORTH 21015 10/15/03 109.95 .00002 PETERSON/FRANK 21016 10/15/03 92.38 008805 PETTY CASH - BREMER BANK 21017 10/15/03 81.50 004372 PLUNKETT'S 21018 10/15/03 86.26 008369 POSTMASTER 21019 10/15/03 2,000.00 007057 PRAXAIR 21020 10/15/03 25.06 00003 PROFESSIONAL TURF 21021 10/15/03 692.25 008611 PTS TOOL SUPPLY 21022 10/15/03 38.13 004492 QWEST 21023 10/15/03 62.08 008372 QWEST INTEPRISE AMERICA, 21024 10/15/03 49.95 008462 RAMSEY COUNTY 21025 10/15/03 514.40 008963 REED BUSINESS INFORMATIO 21026 10/15/03 262.08 008062 RETAIL SERVICES 21027 10/15/03 374.85 003100 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET 21028 10/15/03 15.36 008653 ROSEVILLE FIRE GROUND 21029 10/15/03 33.00 005270 ROSEVILLE RADIO 21030 10/15/03 18.05 003350 SEH-RCM 21031 10/15/03 323.90 008520 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALIT 21032 10/15/03 30.00 008042 SOURCEONE GRAPHICS, INC. 21033 10/15/03 39.41 003155 ST ANTHONY FIRE RELIEF A 21034 10/15/03 37,600.00 002420 STAR TRIBUNE 21035 10/15/03 210.90 008920 T.C. FIELD & COMPANY 21036 10/15/03 1,305.00 008700 TC WEB TECH 21037 10/15/03 522.00 008886 THE TAPE COMPANY 21038 10/15/03 435.72 008840 THOMAS WALKER CONSULTUNG 21039 10/15/03 270.00 N w ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 10/08/2003 08: Check Register GL540R-V06.55 PAGE 3 BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT FIRS BREMER BANK NA 007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 21040 10/15/03 616.78 008907 TOUSLEY FORD 21041 10/15/03 185.17 003560 TRACY PRINTING 21042 10/15/03 268.00 007330 TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC. 21043 10/15/03 15.76 004481 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 21044 10/15/03 23.32 003630 TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICES 21045 10/15/03 6.28 008270 UNITED STATES POSTAL SER 21046 10/15/03 650.00 008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 21047 10/15/03 864.30 008388 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES 21048 10/15/03 21.30 008919 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE 21049 10/15/03 69.16 008273 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. 21050 10/15/03 47,311.63 007325 YOCUM OIL COMPANY, INC. 21051 10/15/03 3,649.27 BREMER BANK NA 259,083.11 *** Y S ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 10/01/2003 08: Check Register GL540R-V06.55 PAGE 1 BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 008969 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES 22497 09/30/03 5,857.50 002374 MINN UC FUND 22498 09/30/03 1,134.00 LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 6,991.50 *** S ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 10/02/2003 14: Check Register GL540R-V06.55 PAGE 1 BANK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 22500 10/15/03 192.00 008794 ARCTIC GLACIER INC. 22501 10/15/03 627.72 008511 AT&T WIRELESS 22502 10/15/03 41.54 008505 BATTERY CITY INC. 22503 10/15/03 23.96 004293 BELLBOY CORP. 22504 10/15/03 2,225.70 004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO., 22505 10/15/03 278.40 004120 EAGLE WINE CO 22506 10/15/03 580.69 004125 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 22507 10/15/03 14,354.80 004135 ELECTRO.WATCHMAN INC 22508 10/15/03 129.72 001030 G & K SERVICES INC 22509 10/15/03 76.44 004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 22510 10/15/03 3,820.80 004207 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 22511 10/15/03 941.10 008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 22512 10/15/03 15.05 004220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 22513 10/15/03 11,438.32 004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 22514 10/15/03 5,405.30 004265 MARK VII SALES INC 22515 10/15/03 6,688.18 008263 MCLEOD USA, INC. 22516 10/15/03 447.00 008392 MERCURY WASTE SOLUTIONS, 22517 10/15/03 43.49 004299 MPLS. OXYGEN CO. 22518 10/15/03 24.45 005232 MURPHY'S SERVICE CENTER 22519 10/15/03 28.76 008883 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 22520 10/15/03 621.00 004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 22521 10/15/03 1,403.00 004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 22522 10/15/03 5,412.70 004361 PINNACLE DIST. 22523 10/15/03 1,363.19 004376 PRIOR WINE CO 22524 10/15/03 1,874.90 004385 QUALITY WINE CO 22525 10/15/03 10,892.19 008983 SOULO DESIGN, INC 22526 10/15/03 128.00 008920 T.C. FIELD & COMPANY 22527 10/15/03 195.00 008336 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 22528 10/15/03 344.95 008270 UNITED STATES POSTAL SER 22529 10/15/03 50.00 LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 69,668.35 `*+ 27 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE 2003-012 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO FEES, AMENDING SECTION 615.07, FEE NOS. 7 AND 10, OF THE ST. ANTHONY CODE The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 615.07, Number 7 and Number 10 is amended to read as follows: Fee Code No. No. P=ose of Fee Amount 7 1000.03 Water connection permit $450.00 10 1005.01 Sewer connection permit Residential $850.00 Commercial/ Industrial Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective as of the date of its publication. First Reading: September 9, 2003 Second Reading: September 23, 2003 Adopted: October 14, 2003 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin 4 •ASS ra es,Inc., - August 21, 2003. • i Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Staff ` 5 City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road NE c iE St. Anthony, MN 55418 _4�r9 we'_Vi3Kt. Re: Proposed Increases to the City of St. Anthony's SAC/WAC Charges WSB Project No. 1065-86 Dear Mayor, City Council, and Staff. -' This letter is provided to you for discussion on the City's current development charges as it relates to the sanitary sewer access charge (SAC) and water access charge (WAC). The City of St. Anthony currently collects fees from Developers to connect to the City's trunk sanitary sewer systems and water systems. The current fees charged by St. Anthony Village are r approximately$150 for SAC and $100 for WAC. These charges are typically collected from r -W development as it occurs to pay for the trunk system improvements necessary to serve new homes and businesses within St. Anthony Village. In addition, the Metropolitan Council j collects a SAC charge of$1,275 for each new sanitary sewer connection. The northwest quadrant and southern portions of St. Anthony Village are anticipated to redevelop, which will require trunk sanitary sewer and water system improvements. The ` October 2002 sanitary sewer and water system plan updates completed by WSB for St. Anthony Village identified approximately $2.2 million in sanitary trunk system improvements ' and-$1.1 million in water system improvements that are needed to accommodate the r redevelopment activities proposed in St. Anthony Village. In light of these costs, it is T z proposed that the SAC and WAC charges in St. Anthony Village be adjusted for proposed �7 redevelopment areas to collect the revenue necessary to complete these system improvements. Based on a review of development anticipated within the next five(5) years in St. Anthony Village, it is recommended that the SAC charge be increased from$150 to $850, and the WAC charge be increased from $200 to $450 for all new development and redevelopment in t the City. 2Y fii The increased fees from SAC and WAC are anticipated to cover the costs to upgrade and 415 improve the City's sanitary and waters stem for the purposes of accommodating future Me per - redevelopment. Maintenance activities and routine replacement of systems will be covered by the City's water and sewer utility fees. Suit w . jl 4 47 763 .�Y � � Minneapolis • St. Cloud • Equal Opportunity Employer F:I WPWPAJ 065-861082103-hmcc.doc Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Staff 29 August 21, 2003 Page 2 G The purpose of this letter is to provide the Council a format to discuss a possible increase in the SAC and WAC charges to accommodate the impact of redevelopment on the City's infrastructure. Should the Council desire to go forward with the proposed increases in the SAC and WAC charges, the City's attorney will draft up the necessary resolution to adjust the rate schedule in accordance with the City's ordinances. If you have any questions, I will be available at the August 26 Council meeting to discuss them, or please call me at 763-287- 7182. Sincerely, WSB &Associates, Inc. Todd E. Hubmer, P.E. Associate Attachments ]h/sm F.I WPWLVI106S-861082103-hmcc.doc > >` Northwest Youth 30 a �' &` Famil Y Services 3490 Lexin,�ton;hvnue Alorth, Suite 205 0. Shoreview, ,WN 5.5126 • Phone (651) 486-3808 .Fax (651) 486-3858 To our Friends at the City of St. Anthony, The following is a brief report on Northwest Youth &Family Services' programs that directly affect the residents of your community. If you have any questions about this report, please call Kay Andrews, Executive Director, at(651) 486-3808 ext. 243 or Lauren Edlund, Development Assistant, at(651)486-3808 ext. 256. City of St. Anthony Report Period: Jan. 1, 2003 to June 30, 2003 Annual City Contract for Service 2003: Your contract for service covers mental health, diversion, youth-run business and senior chore programs. All other services are provided as an additional benefit. In addition to city support, NYFS actively seeks operating funds from foundations, businesses, state and county contracts for service, civic groups and individuals. Through this collaborative effort, we are able to fund a wide range of services to families and individuals in need. Total market value of contracted services through June 30: $2,100 Total market value of non-contracted services through June 30: X850 Total market value of all services through June 30: (Please note that these numbers represent the market value of services provided,not what NYFS charges for these services.Because of your collaboration with NYFS,many of these services are offered free ofcharge or on a sliding-fee scale based on income.) Contracted Services: Market Value #Served. Hours of Service Mental Health Counseling $1,615 4 Clients Diversion Services 17 $125 1 Youth 3 Senior Chore Seniors $220 2 Seniors Youth Run Business 11 $140 1 Youth 4 Non-Contracted Services Market Value #Served Hours of Service Community Social Work $850 1 Family 17 www.nyfs.org 31 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RESOLUTION 03 - 086 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY, AWARDING THE BID FOR BID PACKAGE NO. 2 WHEREAS, bids were called for bid package no. 2 relating to construction of a Public Works facility; and WHEREAS, bids were received and reviewed for said project on September 25, 2003; and WHEREAS, Kraus-Anderson Construction, Inc. recommended the bid be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder for each Bid Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby awards the bid for Bid Package No. 2 relating to construction of a Public Works facility, as recommended by Kraus-Anderson Construction, Inc. in the letter attached hereto. Adopted this day of , 2003. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for Administration: City Manager 32 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RESOLUTION 03 - 087 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OF A FIRE STATION, REJECTING ANY AND ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR BID PACKAGE NO. 2 WHEREAS, bids were called for bid package no. 2 relating to construction of a Fire Station; and WHEREAS, bids were received and reviewed for said project on September 23, 2003; and WHEREAS, Kraus-Anderson Construction, Inc. recommended bids, as received, be rejected for each Bid Division. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby rejects any and all bids for Bid Package No. 2 relating to construction of a Fire Station. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby authorizes the redesigning and re-bidding of the Fire Station project. Adopted this day of 22003. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for Administration: City Manager 33 KRAUS-ANDERSONe CONSTRUCTION COMPANY S CONTRACTORS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS October 8, 2003 Michael Morrison City Manager City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony,MN 55418 Re: St. Anthony Fire Station/St. Anthony Public Works St. Anthony,Minnesota Dear Mr. Morrison: As Construction Manager for the City of St. Anthony, Kraus-Anderson©Construction Company, Midwest Division would like to make its recommendations to the City for the consideration of bids received recently for the Fire Station and Public Works projects. As you know, the City has previously awarded bids for Site Utilities, Earthwork, Footings, Foundations and long-lead structural items for both projects, and the sitework at both locations is well underway. Recently we received bids for BP-2, which is for the building completion, mechanical and electrical construction for both projects. The Fire Station bids were received on September 23, 2003 and the Public Works bids were received on September 25,2003. The total recommended award amount for the Public Works BP-2 Bid Division Nos. 1 through 23, including Alternate Nos.. 7,8,9,10 is $1,389,774.00. In addition, we are proposing the acceptance of other value engineering and cost reduction items as developed by the project team. It should be noted that accepting deduct Alternate No. 10 will result in the deletion of about 4,300 sq.ft. of building that includes Public Works Shop and Utility Storage Areas, as well as Police Squad Car and Vehicle Storage (see attached drawing). However, the value of this deduct is $157,000.00 and this amount is needed to cover• the costs of dealing with the unsuitable and contaminated soils encountered in the excavation portion of BP-l. Awarding these bids and acceptance of the value engineering/cost reduction items will result in a total cost amount, within the approved construction budget amount of$2,400,000.00. Midwest Division 8625 Renclova Street, Circle Pines, MN 55014 Phone:(763) 786-7711 Fax: (763) 786-2650 Equil Opporkinity Employer 34 Michael Morrison -2- October 8, 2003 City of St. Anthony On the other hand, the BP-2 bids, even with deduct Alternate Nos. 6 and 7 for the Fire Station came in at an amount that causes the construction budget to be exceeded by nearly 20%. Therefore, we recommend that the Fire Station bids be rejected and the project be re-bid in order to meet the approved construction budget amount of$1,700,000.00. The project team including Kraus-Anderson, Oertel Architects and City Staff, have been working diligently to reduce areas of the building, which will ultimately result in meeting the approved budget. We are confident that these efforts will result in a design that will still meet the needs of the City and its Fire Department and produce bids that will be on budget. Very truly yours, KRAUS-ANDERSON®CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MIDWEST DIVISON ./lam #GaryD.fenson Vice President GDB:rh c: Jeff Oertel,Oertel Architects/Jon M. Kuenstling, KAMW/Scott Johnson,KAMW M e OERTEL e c o E F c u J R E ARCHITECTS + --'—-----'---------' ar — -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------- ST.ANTHONY i I 56lOFS STO (e 6 caF.,.l.l 'pOLI4�3 � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7801 Chandler OFIre .—.——_—.— - —� SI An",MN BID PACK#1 SITE AND ' - STRUCTURAL e j 4 - - - �- �''',;" • t BID PACK#2 -- - BUILDING PACKAGE CID la..ee i l i 4 I I I I I I wr• I � r � r I I I L 14 4 Yr rI M ► 8v p ►rt i ~ I ~ r n irc umrt cur r i I I I I umrt Y InK I I �/, T ®r ! «. o- _ --- ---- --- - G8 W-!a� Vr f1 ar 4 3 Li Iwo I 77: InJ .e ® a, lam I C _ �� 0 Fin ]] _—. _—.€'_—_ _I 1 0• ° , I nWl. I I 1 aca r __1 I � �r_____, I ,a.e sl Jlq r---- --- ' _ J ------ F y -------- Yr bA bB e.] B.9 G! W,6 J.1 J.9 i"[n.h�•v�x� n F4.i]OVl .AO - I FLOOR PLAN ve•�I-o• �m FLOOR PLAN A1.1 36 KRAUS-ANDERSON®CONSTRUCTION COMPANY S CONTRACTORS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS October 14, 2003 Michael Morrison City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony,MN 55418 Re: St. Anthony Public Works BP-2 General Construction,Mechanical and Electrical St. Anthony, Minnesota Dear Mr. Morrison: This letter is concerning the contract awards for the above referenced project that was bid on Thursday, September 25, 2003. Listed below are the lowest responsible Contractor and the proposal amount for Bid Division Nos. 1 through 23 and Alternate Nos.7, 8, 9 and 10: BID DIVISION 1 —Fencing—Century Fence Company—base bid- $16,638.00— total contract amount-$16,638.00. BID DIVISION 2—Landscaping—Rejected. BID DIVISION 3 —Concrete/Masonry—ADB Construction Company, Inc. —base bid -$219,338.00—deduct Alternate Nos. 7 and 10 -$(22,400.00)- total contract amount- $196,938.00. BID DMSION 4—Miscellaneous Metals (Material Only)—Willoughby Enterprises,Inc.—base bid- $20,745.00—total contract amount-$20,745.00. BID DIVISION 5—Steel Erection—Structural &Misc. Metals (Labor Only)— Red Cedar Steel Erectors,Inc. —base bid- $33,725.00—deduct Alternate No. 8— $(400.00) - total contract amount-$33,325.00. BID DIVISION 6—General Construction—Spicer Contracting, Inc.—base bid- $97,250.00—deduct Alternate Nos. 8,9 and 10-$(10,300.00)- total contract amount- $86,950.00. BID DIVISION 7—Roofing and Flashing—S.G.O. Roofing and Construction, LLC—base bid-$92,548.00—deduct Alternate Nos. 8 and 9 $(1,028.00) — total contract amount- $91,520.00. BID DIVISION 8—Hollow Metal Doors,Finish Hardware, Hollow Metal Frames,Wood Doors—Bredemus Hardware Co., Inc. —base bid-$26,150.00— deduct Alternate No. 10-$(7,254.00)- total contract amount-$18,896.00. BID DMSION 9—Sectional Overhead Doors—Twin City Garage Door Company—base bid-$43,504.00—deduct Alternate No. 10-$(1,165.00)-total contract amount-$42,339.00. Midwest Division 8625 Renclova Street, Circle Pines, MN 55014 Phone: (763) 786-7711 Fax: (763) 786-2650 Equal Opportunity Employer 37 Michael Morrison City of St. Anthony -2- October 14, 2003 BID DIVISION 10—Aluminum Entrances, Heavy Commercial Aluminum Windows,Door Operators, Curtainwall &Glazing—ACG,Inc.—base bid- $45,530.00—deduct Alternate No. 10 -$(60.00) - total contract amount- $45,470.00. BID DIVISION 11 —N/A BID DIVISION 12—Drywall and Sprayed-on Fireproofing—M. Reinert Drywall, Inc.—base bid-$42,000.00—deduct Alternate Nos. 8 and 10 -$(2,000.00)-total contract amount- $40,000.00. BID DIVISION 13—Tile Work—CD Tile and Stone,Inc. —base bid-$14,500.00 —total contract amount-$14,500.00. COMBINED BID DIVISION 14 & 15—Acoustical Ceilings/Resilient Flooring and Base—Architectural Sales of Minnesota,Inc.—base combined bid - $10,200..00—total combined contract amount-$10,200.00. BID DIVISION 16—Painting—Steinbrecher Painting Inc. - base bid- $25,900.00 - total contract amount—$25,900.00. BID DIVISION 17—Rejected. BID DIVISION 18—Truck Lifts—No Bids Received. BID DIVISION 19—Rejected. BID DIVISION 20—Fire Protection—Viking Sprinkler—base bid - $37,800.00- -deduct Alternate Nos. 8 and 10 -$(3,800.00)-total contract amount- $34,000.00. BID DIVISION 21 —Mechanical —Plumbing&HVAC—United States Mechanical,Inc. —base bid$559,903.00—deduct Alternate No. 10—$(44,700.00) - total contract amount-$515,203.00. BID DIVISION 22—Electrical—White Bear Electric, Inc.—base bid- $215,550.00—deduct Alternate No. 10-$(18,400.00) - total contract amount - $197,150.00. BID DIVISION 23 —Special Coatings—Rejected. Based on the current information we have, it is. our recommendation to award Bid Division 1 contract to Century Fence Company, Bid Division 3 to ADB Construction Company, Inc., Bid Division 4 to Willoughby Enterprises, Inc. and Bid Division 5 to Red Cedar Steel Erectors, Inc., Bid Division 6 to Spicer Contracting, Inc., Bid Division 7 to S.G.O. Roofing and Construction, LLC, Bid Division 8 to Bredemus Hardware Co., Inc., Bid Division 9 to Twin City Garage Door Company, Bid Division 10 to ACG, Inc., Bid Division 12 to M.Reinert Drywall, Inc., Bid Division 13 to CD Tile and Stone, Inc., Combined Bid Division 14&15 to Architectural Sales of Minnesota, Inc., Bid Division 16 to Steinbrecher Painting Inc., Bid Division 20 to Viking Sprinkler, Bid Division 21 to United States Mechanical, Inc., Bid Division 22 to White Bear Electric, Inc.. 38 Michael Morrison City of St. Anthony -3- October 14, 2003 The total bid amount for BP-1 Bid Division Nos.. 1 through 7 is $666,732.00, which has already been awarded. The total bid amount for BP-2 Bid Division Nos. 1 through 23, which includes Alternate Nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10 is $1,389,774.00. However, Bids to be awarded will be subject to further value engineering reductions which will be executed by issuing change orders for these accepted reductions. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 763-786-7711. Very truly yours, KRAUS-ANDERSONoCONSTRUCTION COMPANY MIDWEST DIVISION Scott E. Joh son Project Manager SEJ:rh c: Jeff Oertel, Oertel Architects Gary D. Benson, KAMW .Ton M. Kuenstling,KAMW 39 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RESOLUTION 03 - 090 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ST. ANTHONY/NEW BRIGHTON SCHOOL DISTRICT#282 LEVY REFERENDUM WHEREAS, St. Anthony/New Brighton School District#282 is preparing for a levy referendum to be considered at the November 4, 2003 Local General Election; and WHEREAS, said Schools are vital assets to the community as a whole; and WHEREAS, the Schools' excellent educational qualities are widely respected; and WHEREAS, the Schools provide integral places in the social and cultural fabric of the community; and WHEREAS, a strong, vibrant School District is a catalyst as an economic engine and it attracts new residents as well as businesses; and WHEREAS, a community-wide based blue ribbon advisory panel has recommended this referendum be moved forward; and WHEREAS, the St. Anthony City Council has met with School District representatives and understands the need for the referendum, as presented on the 2003 Local Election ballot. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby endorses and supports the upcoming St. Anthony/New Brighton School District#282 levy referendum and encourages community residents to vote "Yes"in support of the referendum. Adopted this day of , 2003. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for Administration: City Manager 4® MEMORANDUM DATE: October 9, 2003 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager SUBJECT: COUNCIL ENDORSEMENT OF ISD #282 LEVY . REFERENDUM Attached is a resolution prepared by Councilmember Jerry Faust in support of the St. Anthony School District#282 Levy Referendum. The St. Anthony School District will have a levy referendum as part of the November 4, 2003 Local General Election. The referendum is to address financial challenges being experienced by the School District relating to on-going school operations. Representatives of the School Board met with the City Council on two occasions to discuss the need for this referendum. The City Council recognizes the important role that the community plays in helping the school environment and their on-going operations and noted the numerous successful partnerships already existing between the City and School District. The referendum is a three-part question which will allow the school revenue for technology and curriculum improvements and will maintain student programs and services. 41 : N 0 b 4. 1 - er . . vem: A Message from the School Board As members of the School Board,we take great pride in the excellent education our district provides for the students of the St.Anthony-New Brighton Schools. We believe that the children of our community are part of a unique educational environment.We offer a comprehensive educational program in a safe,caring, personalized environment that reflects the.strengths and values of the St.Anthony and New Brighton communities. Our district enjoys a long-standing tradition of excellence.We have dedicated and talented teachers and staff,and we offer excellent programs for students. We provide extracurricular opportunities that allow our,children to be involved and experience success in many ways.And we are committed to providing technology resources that prepare our students to succeed in the 21st century. Like many districts throughout Minnesota,though,we are facing a funding dilemma: Costs are increasing,while funding is not keeping pace.The cost of maintaining, current programs—including teachers,textbooks and technology—increases every year,and state per-pupil funding of education is not keeping up.That dilemma leaves school districts with two options: Find new funding or reduce programs. It's that UJ simple. . On November 4, voters will be asked to consider three proposals to help support the work we do for students:. O Question 1 will provide additional revenues for technology improvements. O Question 2 will provide additional revenues for curriculum materials and support. O Question 3 will provide additional revenues to help maintain student programs and services. These three referendum proposals will help continue our tradition of excellence for students throughout our district. We encourage you to give serious consideration to these referendum proposals, and we look forward to seeing you at the polls on November 4. Rick Dunn,Chair Barry Kinsey,Treasurer Mike Volna, Vice Chair Jane Eckert,Director Denise Dunn,Clerk Dave Evans,Director St. AnthonymNe' w Brighton . School District 282. (over) 42 Th B -ICS Challenges O State funding has not been keeping pace with the increasing costs of providing basic student programs and services over the past 10,years.State funding is frozen at last year's level for the next two years. O Budget adjustments to cover$1.3 million in funding shortfalls for the St.Anthony-New Brighton School District over the last four years have affected staffing and student programs. Needs Additional funding is needed to: O Maintain and improve computer technology to enhance educational opportunities for students and-support home/school communications. O Provide needed curriculum materials and support for students,including textbooks,library books and other learning materials. O Help maintain student programs and services. Proposal n O Question 1:A seven-year capital levy would raise$180,000 per year dedicated to technology improvements,for a total of$1.26 million in new revenues. O Question 2:A seven-year capital levy would raise$140,000 per year dedicated to curriculum materials and support,for a total of$980,000 in new revenues. O Question 3:A four-year operating levy would generate an estimated$225 per pupil unit in 2004, or$259,000 in new revenues to help operate our schools and maintain student programs.A new state. inflation factor could help maintain the buying power of the district's total operating levy revenues in years 2-4. Tax Increase For every$100,000 of valuation for residential homesteaded property(taxable market.value, not selling price): O Question 1 would increase school taxes by$27 per year,.or about 7¢ per day. O Question 2 would increase school taxes by$21 per year,or about 6¢ per day. O Question 3 would increase school taxes by$39 per year,or about 110 per day,with an inflation factor for years 2-4. O All three questions would increase school taxes by$87 per year,or about 24¢per day. For more information, contact the Superintendent's.Office at 612-706-1000. Prepared and paid for by St.Anthony-New Brighton School District 282,3303 33rd Avenue N.E.,St.Anthony,MN 55418. 9/30 This publication is nor circulated on behalf of any candidate or ballot question. 43 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RESOLUTION 03 - 088 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO COMMUNITY SERVICES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St.Anthony recognizes that Community Services provides a variety of recreational opportunities and senior citizen activities to community residents; and WHEREAS, due to changes enacted by the State Legislature, St. Anthony-New Brighton School District#282 no longer is allowed to levy$54,000 for the cost of operating Community Services; and WHEREAS, the City Council supports recreational opportunities and senior citizen activities for residents of the community and wishes Community Services to continue to provide these services; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony's Finance Director performed an analysis to determine available funding through the City for said services for 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby authorizes $27,000 be transferred from the Tires Plus Building Fund to fund the 2004 Community Services deficit. Adopted this day of ) 2003. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for Administration: City Manager 44 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 2003 TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director ITEM: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEFECIT Per your direction, I completed an analysis to determine the cost of the City supporting the $54,000 Community Services levy versus the present cost of the School District's levy. It is my understanding that effective July 1, 2004, the School can no longer levy the cost of Community Services and the School Board has asked the City to absorb the levy. The question was asked, "if the School reduced its levy by $54,000 and the City increased theirs by $54,000, would the cost be the same to the residents?" To determine the answer, I worked with Hennepin County. The result is as follows (the analysis is based on 2003 collectible taxes): $200,000 St. Anthony Home $2,000—Tax Capacity Annual School Tax for Community Services $16.12 Annual City Tax for Community Services $21.32 Amount of Annual Increase $ 5.20 The increase is because the City has a lower tax capacity ($5,067,038) compared to the School's $6,143,961 (their base includes part of New Brighton). In addition, because of strict levy limits in 2004, the City could not absorb this into its budget until January 2005. This equates to a funding gap of$27,000 for one-half of the year 2004. The options for funding the gap could be as follows: 1) School funds the deficit for 2004. City absorbs the levy in 2005. 2) City funds gap/absorbs the levy in 2005: a. Dedicates budget reserves from 2003 budget. b. Transfer 2003 —Liquor Profits. c. Appropriate funds from Tires Plus Building Fund (remaining balance at 6/30/04 will be approximately $316,108.00. 45 Recommendation: If Council opts to the fund the gap, the Tires Plus money is the most prudent financial alternative of the three options. With all the changes to our budgeting process, we do not know if there will be any 2003 budget reserves to appropriate. In addition, the redevelopment of the Stonehouse/SAV I will reduce our 2003 operating profit numbers, which means funds may or may not be available. 46 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE 2003-013 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO HEATING LICENSES, AMENDING SECTION 615.06 OF THE ST. ANTHONY CODE BY ADDING MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE 326.992 The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 615.06 of the St. Anthony Code shall be amended to read as follows: Section 615.06 Other License Fees. No person other than the City man engage in the following businesses types of activity without first paying the fee listed in this Chapter and obtaining a license as provided in this Chapter. License Fee Term Minnesota Statutes HVAC, plumbing, gas $35.00 One year 326.37 piping 326.45 326.46 326.521 326.992 Section 2. Minnesota State Statute 326.992 (Bond requirement; gas, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, refrigeration(G/HVACR) contractors) became effective July 1, 2003. First Reading: October 14, 2003 Second Reading Adopted: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin 47 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 16, 2003 TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager FROM: Judy Monson, Permit Clerk RE: Heating License Effective Julyl, 2003 the State of Minnesota has required all HVAC contractors to have a bond in the amount of$25,000 filed with the State of Minnesota before being issued a license or permit. Therefore, the City must add Minnesota State Statute 326.992(bond requirement) to the City Ordinance, Section 615.06, Other License Fees. Current: License Fee Term Minnesota Statutes HVAC, plumbing, $35.00 One Year 326.37 gas piping 326.45 326.46 326.521 Change to: License Fee Term Minnesota Statutes HVAC, plumbing, $35.00 One Year 326.37 gas piping 326.45 326.46 326.521 326.992 See the attached memo from the State of Minnesota .t < 48 E� S® Department of Administration 41", MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 2003 TO: All Municipalities, Building Officials,and Mechanical Contractors FROM: Thomas R. Joachim State Building Official SUBJECT: Statewide Surety Bond and Filing Fee Requirements for mechanical work per MS 326.992 in Minnesota. Law effective: July 1, 2003 The State Legislature passed a law effective July 1, 2003 requiring anyone who installs gas piping, heating, ventilation, cooling, air conditioning, fuel burning or refrigeration (G/VHACR) equipment to post a$25,000 bond and file with the Department of Administration, Building Codes and Standards Division. This bond is for the benefit of persons suffering financial loss:by reason of the contractor's failure to comply with the requirements of the State Mechanical Code. Further, this statute provides this bond in lieu of bonds required by local political subdivisions required for work covered by the statute. A bond in the amount of$25,000 and an annual $15 filing fee must be filed with the Minnesota Department of Administration, Building Codes and Standards Division. The names of contractors who have submitted their yearly filing and bond will be posted on the Building Codes and Standards website: www.buildinizcodes.admin.state.mn.us A copy of the Mechanical Surety Bond and Fee filing form is enclosed. The form is also available for download on the Building Codes and Standards website. Minnesota Statute 326.992 [Bond requirement; gas, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, refrigeration(G/HVACR) contractors.] (a) A person contracting to do gas, heating, ventilation, cooling, air conditioning, fuel burning, or refrigeration work must give bond to the state in the amount of$25,000 for all work entered into within.the state. The bond must be for the benefit of persons suffering financial loss by reason of the contractor's failure to comply with the requirements of the State Mechanical Code. A bond given to the state must be filed with the commissioner of Administration and is in lieu of all other bonds to any political subdivision required for work covered by this section. The bond must be written by a corporate surety licensed to do business in the state. (b) The commissioner of administration may charge each person giving bond under this section an annual bond filing fee of$15. The money must be deposited in a special revenue fund and is appropriated to the commissioner to cover the cost of administering the bond program. Building Codes and Standards Division,408 Metro Square Building, 121 7th Place,St.Paul,MN 55101-2181 651.296.4639 Fax:651-297-1973 TTY: 1.800.627.3529 and ask for 296.9929 www.buildingcodes.admin.mn.us 49 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY ORDINANCE 2003-014 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS; AMENDING SECTION 200.01, SUBD. 1 OF THE ST. ANTHONY CODE The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 200.01, Subd. 1 of the St. Anthony Code shall be amended to read as follows: Section 200.01 Meetings. Subd. 1. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Council will be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each calendar month at 7:00 pm. Any regular meeting falling upon a holiday will be held at 7:00 pm on the preceding Tuesday. All regular meetings and adjourned regular meetings will be held in the,Council Chambers in the City Hall unless the Council determines that a regular meeting should be held elsewhere, in which case notice of the time and place of the meeting will be posted on the door entrances to the City Hall and, if time permits, published in the official newspaper. The 6ouneii ineeting field on the sec Tuesday of the month will be conducted as a study session and only eouncil acted upon. The eouncii meeting held on the f6urth Tuesday of the month wif!be conducted as a regular eouncil meeting during which the great majority of th eotnicil business will be acted upon. Section 2. This ordinance will become effective as of the date of its publication. First Reading: October 14, 2003 Second Reading Adopted: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin 5® MEMORANDUM DATE: October 1, 2003 TO: Michael Mornson, City Manager FROM: Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE Recently, I noted that the code is out-of-date relating to the Council's regular meetings. Attached, is a proposed ordinance change which deletes the portion stating the second Council meeting of the month would be considered a work session. Both monthly meetings of the Council, on the second and fourth Tuesdays, are currently regular Council meetings. Council work sessions are briefly addressed in the "Standing Rules" which are adopted the first Council meeting of each year. ' I 51 Chapter 2. OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION Section 200 - RULES FOR THE ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURE OF THE COUNCIL 200.01 Meetings. Subd. 1. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Council will be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each calendar month at 7:00 p.m. Any regular meeting falling upon a holiday will be held at 7:00 p.m. on the preceding Tuesday. All regular meetings and adjourned regular meetings will be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall unless the Council determines that a regular meeting should be held elsewhere, in which case notice of the time and place of the meeting will be posted on the door entrances to the City Hall and, if time permits, published in the official newspaper. The Council meeting held on the second Tuesday of the month will be conducted as a study session and only Council business deemed necessary by the Councilmembers and/or City Manager will be acted upon. The Council meeting held on the fourth Tuesday of the month will be conducted as a regular Council meeting during which the great majority of the Council business will be acted upon. Subd. 2. Special Meetings. The Mayor or any two members of the Council may call a special meeting of the Council by notifying the Clerk of the time, place and purpose of the meeting. Unless a special meeting date and time is set by the Council at a Council meeting, the Clerk shall give each Councilmember at least 3 days' notice of the-meeting. The notice will specify the time, place and purpose of the meeting and will identify the person or persons who called the meeting. The notice will be delivered to the Councilmember personally or to the Councilmember's home by mail. When written notice of a special meeting is not given in accordance with this subdivision, a meeting attended by all the members of the Council or where any member unable to attend gives Written notice to the Council that he or she waives written notice of the special meeting, will be a valid special meeting for the transaction of any business that comes before the meeting. Only business specified in the notice of the special meeting will be transacted and voted on at the special meetings, unless the meeting is attended by all members of the Council and the additional items brought forth are approved for discussion by a majority of the Council. Subd. 3. Public Meetings. All Council meetings, including special and adjourned meetings and meetings of Council committees, will be open to the public, except as otherwise provided by law. Subd. 4. First Meeting of the Year. At the first Council meeting in January of each year or as soon after as reasonably possible, the Council will: (a) Designate the repository or depositories for City funds. 2-1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY - QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT ON 2003 GOALS September, 2003 Goal Progress Target -Implementation Problems (if applicable) Completion Date or Comments 1. Redevelop Apache Center Area Public hearings held in September October 2007 EAW completed Property PUD approved for commercial, Term Sheet approved September 23 TIF Plan approved 2. Develop Public Facilities Plan Groundbreaking September 9 May 2004 Great interest rate 3. Prepare Option to Redevelop Public hearing held July 22 May 2004 Groundbreaking on September 16 Stonehouse Property 4. Develop plan for reduced state Implemented hiring freeze and cut August 2003 Currently not filling 4 vacancies revenues expenditures 5. Prepare Plan for Infiltration Engineering update 5/27/03 On going This is on hold at the request of Metropolitan and Inflow Council 6. Enhance community 3 public open houses & 3 On-going On-going involvement in critical city newsletters on task force; Mayor's issues State of the City 1P MEMORANDUM DATE: October 9, 2003 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO LEASE WATER TOWER Attached is a proposal from LCC International to lease the City's water tower site for a telecommunications facility. The lease, as proposed, would be for a year term with four options to renew. The rent the City would receive is $1,350 per month, or$16,200 per year. In previous years, the City has rejected this type of use of the tower due to the low amount of revenue that would have been received. Proposed monthly revenue in previous years was $600 and, the Council did not want to clutter the water tower with telecommunication apparatus. Cuts in state aid funding has caused staff to explore additional revenue options to fund operations. If the Council is interested in exploring this revenue source, we could either request staff to enter into negotiations with this company, or we could have the company make a presentation to the Council first, then enter into negotiations. r too.KPIN" � the knowledge that powers the networV October 2, 2003 St.Anthony Village Jay Hartman Director of Public Works 3301 Silver Lake Road St.Anthony,Minnesota 55418-1699 Dear Mr.Hartman, The City of St.Anthony's Water Tank has been identified as a potential telecommunications facility for Sprint Spectrum L.P(Sprint PCS). Sprint Spectrum L.P.currently holds an FCC license to provide digital wireless communication services in Minneapolis. Sprint Spectrum L.P.has hired LCC International to perform Leasing, Zoning,and Construction in the Minneapolis market. Sprint's wireless communications facility provides a source of rental income to the City of St.Anthony with no investment from the City. The communications facility will require no improved leased area and will be an unmanned facility. Sprint's equipment is clean,quite,smoke free and safe. It will improve wireless communications service to the community of St.Anthony and provide additional revenue. Sprint would like to install the following equipment on your facility: • An initial install of(9)nine antennas with the ability to install'up to 12 antennas in the future; • A 30'X 30'lease are to accommodate Sprint's BTS equipment cabinets and platform • Coaxial cables and associated hardware; • 240 Volt,single phase, 100 amp power and • A(T1 span)telephone line. Proposed Lease Terms: Initial lease terms:Five Years Renewal Terms:(4)Four—Fiver year,Automatic Renewal Terms Proposed Rent: $1350/month and a 15%per term rent escalator The cost of all utilities;phone lines,and necessary improvements will be paid for by Sprint Spectrum L.P. Please find enclosed an Entry and Testing Agreement and a Site Agreement, If you have any questions,feel free to contact me at 612-366-8944. Although Sprint Spectrum L.R originally budgeted$1,000/month for the installation of this site,Sprint would be willing to pay$1350.00 per month, 15%per term rent escalator with the understanding that we can come to a mutual agreement on the lease by November 1� 2003. Please review let me know if you would like to set a time to discuss-your comments regarding the lease agreement. Thank you in advance for your time.and consideration! Sincerely, David W.Fischer Site Acquisition Specialist LCC International October_8, 2003 Gainon ills e FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues October 14 Regular Consent-Ord., sac&wac (3rd reading) Presentation by Kay Andrews,Northwest Youth& Family Services C. Ranallo Cable Commission report Res's. Consider bids for Public Works &Fire Facilities Res., school referendum Res., Community Services funding Ord.,re: Amend license ord. (heating) (1"reading) Ord.,re: Amend regular Council meeting schedule (l"reading) Quarterly review of goals October 28 Regular Planning Commission issues of October 21 Kathy Anderson,representing Congressman Sabo Ord.,re: Amend license ord. (heating) (2nd reading) Ord.,re: Amend regular Council meeting schedule (2nd reading) Development agreement/Pratt? November 4 Regular 8:00 pm Proclamation-commend 2 firefighters Hennepin County Assessor Canvass election results Ord.,re: Amend license ord. (heating) (3rd reading) Ord.,re: Amend regular Council meeting schedule (3rd reading) November 25 Regular Planning Commission issues of November 18 Monday, 5:00 pm -Interview Commissioners December 8 Monday, Regular&Truth December 8 in Taxation Monday, Continuation of December 15 Truth in Taxation, if needed October 2003 Monthly Planner 1 75:00 3 4 Sep 2003 Nov 2003 Special S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Meeting 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 10. 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 7:00 PM Parks 7:00 PM Commission Regular Council Meeting Meeting 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7:00 PM Planning Commission Meeting 26 27 28 29 30 31 7:00 PM Regular Council Meeting November 2003 Monthly Planner Oct 2003 Dec 2003 1 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 30 31 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 8:00 PM Regular Council meeting and Canvass Local Election Results 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 7:00 PM Parks Regular Council Commission meeting meeting canceled 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 7:00 PM Planning Commission meeting 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 7:00 PM Thanksgiving Day Off Regular Council Day meeting Day Off 30 August -2003 City of St.Anthony Profit&Loss Statement from Operations Actual Actual Year to Date Year to Date Increase SAV I** SAV II STONEHOUSE* 08/31/03 08/31/02 (Decrease) Sales $126,259.00 $238,234.00 $0.00 $3,123,497.00 $3,283,280.00 ($159,783.00) Less: Cost of Goods Sold $99,994.00 $186,138.00 $0.00 $2,312,208.00 $2,336,132.00 ($23,924.00) Gross Profit $26,265.00 $52,096.00 $0.00 $811,289.00 $947,148.00 ($135,859.00) Ratio to Net Sales 20.80% 21.87% 25.97% 28.85% Operating Expense: Salaries,Wages, Benefits $12,914.00 $16,965.00 $11,929.00 $374,374.00 $450,360.00 ($75,986.00) All Other Expenses $14,582.00 $16,399.00 $670.00 $295,037.00 $337,934.00 ($42,897.00) Total Operating Expense $27,496.00 $33,364.00 $12,599.00 $669,411.00 $788,294.00 ($118,883.00) Ratio to Net Sales 21.78% 14.00% 21.43% 24.01% Profit from Operations ($1,231.00) $18,732.00 ($12,599.00) $141,878.00 $158,854.00 ($16,976.00) Other Income $65.00 $44.00 $0.00 $21,028.00 $36,776.00 ($15,748.00) Net Income ($1,166.00) $18,776.00 ($12,599.00) $162,906.00 $195,630.00 ($32,724.00) Ratio to Net Sales -0.92% 7.88% 5.22% 5.96% August-Net Income $5,011.00 Y-T-D SAV 1 SAV II STONEHOUSE ALL STORES YEAR TO DATE 08/31/03 $69,015.00 $75,497.00 $18,394.00 $162,906.00 YEAR TO DATE 08/31/02 $83,854.00 $77,775.00 $34,001.00 $195,630.00 Audited INCREASE/DECREASE ($14,839.00) ($2,278.00) ($15,607.00) ($32,724.00) *Stonehouse On-Sale Closed 5/30/03 **SAV I Off-Sale Closed 8/23/03 August - 2003 City of St.Anthony Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report SAV I SAV II Beginning Inventory: $143,704.51 Beginning Inventory: $269,103.71 Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus: Transfers: SAV I ($75,161.94) Transfers $75,161.94 Stonehouse $0.00 Adjustments $18.29 Adjustments ($1,353.31) **" Returns to Vendors ($11,189.50) Returns to Vendors ($975.69) Add: Receiving $161,570.72 Add: Receiving $32,169.52 Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($186,156.01) Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($98,640.39) TOTAL $308,509.15 TOTAL ($257.30) Total per Valuation Report $308,504.50 *** Total per Valuation Report $0.00 Difference ($4.65) Difference $257.30 Beginning September 2003 Inventory $0.00 Beginning September 2003 Inventory $308,504.50 ""Complete Physical Inventory Taken 'Comes from Valuation Report 2002 Actual Profits (Audited) 2003 Y-T-D Profits Actual Y-T-D SAV I SAV II Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Stonehouse Profits Comparison January $5,583.00 $2,817.00 $3,554.00 $11,954.00 January $6,588.00 $3,381.00 $2,657.00 $12,626.00 $672.00 February $6,023.00 $6,005.00 $9,656.00 $33,638.00 February $4,782.00 $4,181.00 $8,714.00 $30,303.00 ($3,335.00) March $10,455.00 $10,709.00 $7,145.00 $61,947.00 March $10,491.00 $7,536.00 $10,935.00 $59,265.00 ($2,682.00) April $7,341.00 $6,511.00 $10,932.00 $86,731.00 April $10,095.00 $5,921.00 $10,938.00 $86,219.00 ($512.00) May $10,901.00 $14,402.00 $6,374.00 $118,408.00 May $13,695.00 $10,574.00 $8,193.00 $118,681.00 $273.00 June $15,589.00 $16,045.00 $1,586.00 $151,628.00 June $12,616.00 $12,675.00 ($6,792.00) $137,180.00 ($14,448.00) July $8,989.00 $9,839.00 ($7,247.00) $163,209.00 July $11,914.00 $12,453.00 ($3,652.00) $157,895.00 ($5,314.00) August $18,973.00 $11,447.00 $2,001.00 $195,630.00 August ($1,166.00) $18,776.00 ($12,599.00) $162,906.00 ($32,724.00) September $6,675.00 $6,725.00 $4,695.00 $213,725.00 September $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $162,906.00 October $4,618.00 $6,750.00 $402.00 $225,495.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $162,906.00 November $13,789.00 $14,888.00 $4,294.00 $258,466.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $162,906.00 December $8,179.00 $26,775.00 $8,684.00 $302,104.00 December $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $162,906.00 Total $117,115.00 $132,913.00 $52,076.00 $302,104.00 Total $69,015.00 $75,497.00 $18,394.00 $162,906.00 Increase/(Decrease) ($14,839.00) ($2,278.00) ($15,607.00) ($32,724.00) Y-T-D By Store INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 08/31/2003 Interest Date 4/M GENERAL $871,000 RHINELAND FUNDING COMM PAPER .92% 08/15103 11/14/03 $869,018.48 $869,018.48 4/M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION $1,250,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 11/07101 02/22/29 $191,662.50 $ 240,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.00% 08/05/02 08/15/22 $61,800.00 $ 200,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.02% 02/04/03 02/04/28 $101,033.87 $500,000 HOUSEHOLD FINANCE COMM PAPER .92% 08/15/03 11114/03 $498,862.50 $533,000 LOCHART FUNDING COMM PAPER .92% 08/15/03 11/14/03 $531,787.43 $1,385,146.30 DAIN RAUSCHER-GENERAL GNMA POOL 6472 7.50% 07/01/75 07/15/05 $291.69 GNMA POOL 14376 7.50% 03/01177 03/15/07 $988.34 GNMA POOL 23364 9.00% 09/01/78 09/15/08 $457.01 GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01/78 11/15/08 $1,081.31 $100,600 FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 07/25/02 07/25/22 $100,000.00 $670,000 FED HOME LOAN MTG-ZERO COUPON 7.150% 01/22/02 02/22129 $99,948.90 $1,197,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMM PAPER 1.062% 08/15/03 11/13/03 $1,193,878.94 $1,396,646.19 DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL $100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12/15/99 03/08/29 $10,105.00 $100,000 LASELLE BANK-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.50% 09/11/02 09/11/22 $27,798.64 $100,000 STANDARD FEDERAL-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.50% 09/11/02 09/11/22 $27,798.64 $100,000 LASELLEBANK-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.375% 01/08/03 01/22/23 $28,480.61 $100,000 STANDARD FEDERAL-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.375% 01/08/03 01/22/23 $28,480.61 $100,000 LASELLE BANK-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.25% 02119/03 02/19/23 $29,170.00 $100,000 STANDARD FEDERAL-ZERO COUPON BOND 6.25% 02/19/03 02/19/23 $29,170.00 $651,000 GENERAL MOTORS COMMECIAL PAPER 1.041% 08/15103 11/13/03 $649,338.94 $830,342.44 DEAN WITTER $680,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-ZERO 7.10% 06/15/01 04/05/19 $97,722.56 $520,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH ZERO COUPON BOND 6.00% 09/24/02 09/15/18 $199,477.00 $1,125,000.00 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMM PAPER 1.030% 08115/03 11/14/03 $1,122,070.94 $200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6.00% 11/14/01 11/14/16 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-STEP UP 6.50% 12/28/01 12/15/16 $200,000.00 $100,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE 6.25% 07/31/02 07/31/17 $100,000.00 $200,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK MED TERM NOTE 5.976% 08/27/02 10/25/16 $200,000.00 $100,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK MED TERM NOTE 6.00% 11/26/02 10/22127 $100,250.00 $2,219,520.50 DAIN RAUCHER-(HRA) $200,000-FNMA-9334 P/O 7.24% 04/20/93 03/25/23 $17,800.76 $250,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 08/28/02 08/28117 $250,000.00 $1,700,000-GE CAPITAL COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.063% 08/15/03 11/14103 $1.695.709.60 (DECERTICATION-KENZIE TIF) $1,963,510.36 TOTAL BOOK VALUE $8,664,184.27 ----------------- ----------------- Time9/2212003 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT AUGUST 20031NVESTI General Fund Budget to Actual Report: September 2003 Expenditures: Mean Average 75% 09/30/2003 Percentage Remaining Budget Y-T-D Balance Spent Budget Mayor/Council $59,400.00 $24,957.19 $34,442.81 42% 58% Intergovernmental Relations $21,000.00 $15,262.50 $5,737.50 73% 27% Cable Franchise $22,000.00 $22,544.41 -$544.41 102% -2% General Management $79,300.00 $67,138.30 $12,161.70 85% 15% Elections $25,200.00 $9,713.94 $15,486.06 39% 61% Finance/Insurance $224,200.00 $141,595.69 $82,604.31 63% 37% Finance/Assessing $41,600.00 $1,854.32 $39,745.68 4% 96% Legal $96,000.00 $73,302.46 $22,697.54 76% 24% Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,600.00 $588.61 $2,011.39 23% 77% City Buildings $121,400.00 $67,215.03 $54,184.97 55% 45% Civil Defense $45,500.00 $29,891.44 $15,608.56 66% 34% Police Protection $1,159,200.00 $806,516.62 $352,683.38 70%- 30% Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $578,200.00 $402,653.73 $175,546.27 70% 30% Fire Protection $587,400.00 $411,120.98 $176,279.02 70% 30% Inspections/Building Permits $75,400.00 $33,531.94 $41,868.06 44% 56% Animal Control $4,200.00 $1,184.14 $3,015.86 28% 72% Public Works $420,200.00 $259,596.20 $160,603.80 62% 38% Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $125,700.00 $82,927.28 $42,772.72 66% 34% Tree and Weed Care $27,900.00 $18,962.42 $8,937.58 68% 32% Parks $128,200.00 $93,719.48 $34,480.52 73% 27% Budget Reserves/Non Budgeted $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0% 0% Total Expenditures $3,844,600.00 $2,564,276.68 $1,280,323.32 67% 33% Central Park Project Appropriation: $2,704,100.00 _ St.Anthony High School $20,681.25 Total Revenue $2,724,781.25 Hard costs: 09/30/2003 Expenditures Balance Central Park Construction-Veit �$1 661 762p� $1,620,667.80 $41,094.33 City Hall Irrigation $28,100.00 $26,695.00 $1,405.00 Park Building-Thompson,Homes $453,096.90 $438,846.70 $14,250.20 Central Park-Contingency 0 ..34 Ol)0 0 $33,198.04 $801.96 Park Building Contingency $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 Total $2,201,959.03 $82,551.49 Silver Point Park Building/Engineering Soft costs: URS—Planning&Design $269,050.00 $248,603.70 $20,446.30 Budget Expenditures Balance SEH-Engineering/Planning $55,000.00 $55,000.00 0.00 $25,700.00 $25,700.00 $0.00 Total $324,050.00 $20,446.30 Additional Hard Costs: Common Excavation $9,520.00 $9,231.54 $288.46 Common Borrow $36,988.00 $36,038.51 $949.49 Contaminated Soil/Disposal $25,153.58 $24,499.09 $654.49 Soccer Goal Posts $3,000.00 $2,840.47 $159.53 Veit Construction Contract $1,661,762.13 Erosion Control Fence $4,674.25 $4,615.77 $58.48 Change Orders $158,630.83 Lab,Testing-Soils Analysis $1,500.00 $1,420.24 $79.76 $1,820,392.96 Environmental Field Supplies $295.00 $355.06 ($60.06) Lead/Oil Drum Disposal $3,500.00 $3,373.06 $126.94 Budget: Additional Lighting Foundation $30,000.00 $29,292.39 $707.61 Central ParkNeit $1 661 713 Practice Soccer Field $10,000.00 $9,764.13 235.87 ContingencypW$34#000 00 Total 1'24 63083 $3,200.58 Additional/Hard Costs $124630.83 $1,820,392.96 Additional Soft Costs: STS Consultants-Soil Borings $6,646.00 $6,646.00 $0.00 STS-Construction Testing $5,000.00 $2,520.00 $2,480.00 URS-Environmental Services $13,500.00 $3,500.00 $10,000.00 Bond Issuance $23,881.54 $30,786.54 ($6,905.00) Pollution Control $2,362.50 $2,572.50 ($210.00) Advertisement for Bids $390.10 $641.40 ($251.30) Maurice Anderson .r '1 680 00 " $4 940..00 „�; 3 260x00 Total $53,460.14 $1,853.70 High School Change Orders: Irrigation System $2,721.25 $0.00 $2,721.25 Install Jug Filler/Drinking Fountain $650.00 $0.00 $650.00 Trail Between H.S&Pavillion $14,190.00 $0.00 $14,190.00 Intall Asphalt @ H.G.Gym Entrance $3,120.00 $0.00 $3,120.00 Total $20,681.25 $20,681.25 Central Park Project-Totals $2,724,781.25 $2,596,047.93 $128,733.32 Stormwater Fund - Cash on Hand 09/30/2003 Projeted Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date Street Improvement Bonds $3,000,000.00 $2,948,173.80 MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $935,008.45 DNR $5,440,000.00 $5,528,617.36 FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00 Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Storm Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $509,645.42 Storm Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1.594.271.55 Total Project Budget $12,350,000.00 $12,365,716.58 Other Project Activity: Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00 State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27 Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75 HRA-Streetscape Transfer $0.00 $155,100.00 Met Council $20,000.00 $10,000.00 Stormwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00 Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $126,495.42 Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00 Middle Mississippi Watershed District $120,000.00 $120,000.00 29th Avenue-Water Connection Fees $26,000.00 $26,400.00 Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work 0.00 $200.236.25 Total Revenues $12,797,000.00 $13,319,964.27 09/30/2003 Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Date WSB-Engineering Services $390,360.87 Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35 Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $39,847.99 Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025.00 Purchase of Flood Homes $1,204,270.27 Pahl Avenue Ponding $111,308.57 Flood Relief Grant Program $65,159.32 Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master $17,371.44 Sump Pump $246.64 1999 Street Improvement Project $1,128,342.79 2000 Street Improvement Project $2,944,397.37 2001 Street Improvement Project $2,097,075.23 2002 Street Improvement Project $2,361,444.67 St.Anthony Boulevard Street Lighting $371.00 Harding Street Holding Ponds $925,223.57 Silver Point Park/Construction $1.690.333.87 Total Expenditures $12,980,487.95 Project Balance $339,476.32 Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70 Total Cash on Hand $522,655.02 EXPENDITURE REPORT 09130/2003 WSB: Flood Relief Grant Program: 2001 Street Improvement Project _ Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 DennislPenny Gault $10,000.00 WSB-Engineering Services $266,829.82 Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00 Lillie Suburban Newspapers $38.75 Slonnwater Task Force $29,243.00 Thomas/Susan Hoban $800.00 Hage Concrete Works $2,356.53 Storrnwater Engineering $56,309.98 Julie Sexton $1,004.53 Olson's Plumbing $221.90 Flood Problem Analysis $31,497.23 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE $5,280.00 Dickson Electric $453.00 MCES Grant Application $1,724.25 Castle Building&Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Sandness Construction $4,650.00 DNR/FEMA Grants $22,902.13 L.N.Soding-3460 Penrod Lane $600.00 Bond Issuance $21,183.48 Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 J&D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 Park Construction $1.801,341.75 Park Design $156,447.10 St.Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road. $3,301.00 Total 2001 Street Project $2,097,075.23 Ill Study $32,654.50 RiteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue $390.00 Flood Grant-1998/1999/2000/2001/2002 $31,776.25 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 2002 Street Improvement Project Total WSB $390,360.87 Lamere Concrete-Flood Proofing Improvement $4,412.00 Project Description: McCaren Designs,Inc. $703.99 WSB-Engineering Services $271,030.68 Barr Engineering: Minnehaha Falls Landscaping $5,587.50 Dorsey&Whitney $5,220.89 Project Description: Elgard Excavating $1,245.00 Construction Bulletin $215.16 District#6 Watershed Study $2,709,35 Twin Cities Glass Block $1,312.50 Moody's Investors Service $3,250.00 Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Total Flood Relief Program $65,159.32 Springsted,Inc. $13,217.86 Asphalt&Concrete $8,087.00 Dorsey&Whitney: Private Homes•Dumpsters/Service Master Crown Fence&Wire $6,528.10 Project Description: Project Description: Frank Peterson-Misc Repair $59.63 Legal Services for Flooding Issues $17,911.16 Waste Management $391.65 TEK Services-Sod Repair $250.00 Legal Services-Comdenation of Homes $17,117.75 Service Master $13,782.29 Pipe Services Corp. $5,851.20 .Legal Services-4029 Shamrock Drive $1,938.85 Nancy Myhran $259.50 S.M.Hentges&Sons $2.047.734.15 Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2,880,23 Linda Gonier $198.00 Total 2002 Street Project $2,361,444.67 Total Dorsey&Whitney $39,847.99 Susan Kozarek $925.00 Water Quality Stud Elaine Nelson $1,065.00 St.Anthony Boulevard Lighting tY y: Sue Wenker $250.00 Project Description: Silver Lake: Berkley Risk/Insuance Claim-Payment $500.00 WSB-Engineering Services $371.00 Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Total Dumpsters $17,371.44 $371.00 Purchase of Homes: Sump Pump Harding Street Holding Ponds Project Description: Project Description: Project Description: Expenditures Network Title,Inc. $255.00 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00 WSB-Engineering Services $105,886.05 Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $115.64 Bettendorf Rohrer $30,075.00 Demolition $9,156.00 Total Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64 Second Nature Lawn $270,873.76 Taxes $839.61 Residential Easements $432,183.78 Legal Services-Dorsey&Whitney $225.00 1999 Street Improvement Project Dorsey&Whitney/Legal $32,089.52 Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $365.00 Project Description: STS Consultants $3,235.00 Seal&Cap Well $1,450.00 WSB-Engineering Services $176,525.71 Evergreen Land Services $19,519.66 Purchase of 2713 St.Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Construction Bullilen $358.48 Demolition $11,258.00 Northdale Construction $928,231.18 Albrecht,Inc. $20,215.22 Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Treemendous $460.00 Comdemnation Commissioners $8,455.10 Recording Deedfraxes $2,506.98 Chris Addington $503.22 Old Republic-Abstract Fees $2,330.00 Title Insurance $946.00 Dorsey&Whitney $2,911.55 Total Harding Street Holding Ponds $925,223.57 Seal&Cap Well $1,420.00 Bond Issuance Expense $10.875.28 Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,067.10 Total 1999 Street Project $1,128,342.79 Sliver Point Park/Construction Purchase of 2700/2704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45 Project Descripdon: Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $208,072.00 2000 Street Improvement Project Richard Knutson,Inc, $1.466,031.72 Purchase of 4029 Shamrock $264,753.63 Project Description: Sandness Construction $35,524.00 First American Title $375.00 WSB-Engineering Services $315,820.93 Thompson Homes,Inc. $9,832.50 Forsythe Appraisals/Kozarek $350.00 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc. $2,293,303.47 Muska Electric $40,730.80 Evergreen Land Services $3,369.47 Barbarossa&Sons,Inc.-Settlement of Dispute $66,067.84 Construction Bulletin $160.89 Total Purchase of Homes $1,204,270.27 E-CEL Energy $155,100.00 Lillie Suburban News/Bid Notices $84.27 Buchan Environmental Services $2,248.99 Read Business Information/Bid Notices $305.76 Pahl Avenue Ponding: Berkley Risk Services $10,000.00 SEH,Inc.-Silver Point Park Building $33,945.37 Project Description: Allstate Insurance Company $312.78 WSB,Inc.-Silver Point Park Building $4,602.00 WSB-Engineering Services $20,967.16 St.Paul Companies $16,884.96 Twin City Hydro Seeding $1,298.20 G&L Construction $69,998.42 Lillie SuburanNewspaper/Construction Bulletin $232.93 Romtec $6,500.00 Treemendous $14,460.90 Albrecht,Inc. $891.75 STS Consultants $77,356.50 Pipe Services $3,859.20 Fabyanske&Westra-Legal Cost/Lifigation $44,390.49 Metro Hydro Seeding $3,778.76 Crown Fence&Wire $370.00 Bond Issuance Expense $39,143.23 Trillium Park $10.183.10 Construction Bulliten $1,432.20 Total 2000 Street Project $2,944,397.37 Total Silver Point Park $1,690,333.87 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $220.69 Total Pahl Avenue Pending $111,308.57