HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 07182000 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
102866
BOX: 27
Folder: PL PACKETS 2000-2004
Document: PL PACKET 07182000
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN under the Minnesota Statutes, that the Planning Commission will hold a regular
meeting on Tuesday, July 18, 2000, at 7.00 pm at the City Council Chambers, 3301 Silver Lake Road, Saint
Anthony,Minnesota.
NOTE: The Planning Commission has received the staff reports and recommendations, plus supporting
documentation from the applicant, through staff for all items on this agenda.' This information was
distributed prior to the meeting date. Individual Commissioners and staff also visit the application sites
during the week prior to meetings. As a result of this preparation, items which appear to be routine will
typically be handled very quickly, and discussion on disputed or questionable items can begin from a
position ofgeneral understanding ofthe issues.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
Please notify the Chairman prior to the beginning of any meeting of your desire to speak before the
Commission. Your remarks will be limited to five minutes.
I. PUBLIC INPUT
The public may speak at this time on any planning and zoning related matters of a general nature.
However, there will not be any discussion or action by the Commission at this time.
II. MINUTES
1. Approve June 20, 2000 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Action requested.
2. City Council's June 27 and July 11, 2000 regular meeting minutes. No action required.
3. Parks Commission's July 10, 2000 regular meeting minutes. No action required.
III. COMMUNICATION FROM CITY COUNCIL
1. None.
IV. REQUESTS FOR POSTPONEMENTS OR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATIONS
1. PUBLIC HEARING. Hillcrest Development's preliminary development plan for the
Apache Plaza that includes a rezoning from "C" district to a PUD. The applicant has
requested this hearing be postponed until after a Special meeting of the Planning
Commission can be held in the City Hall Council room. The Commission will also hear
Hillcrest's final development plan for the Apache Plaza at the Special meeting.
'Therefore, the Development Review Committee asks that the Commission move to
accept this request, thus scheduling said Special meeting for August 1, 2000 or at such
2
time thereafter as deemed appropriate by the Development Review Committee. Action
required. (pp. 1-3)
V. NEW APPLICATIONS/PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PUBLIC HEARING. Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance. The Frontline Church and
Outreach Center. are asking the City to consider adding a "Church" as a conditional use in a
commercial district. Request is related to Senior Pastor Bill Arrigoni's intent to locate the
Frontline Church and Outreach Center at 2654 Kenzie Terrace. Action required. (pp. 4-30)
2. PUBLIC HEARING. Application for Conditional Use Permit. .Applicants Hadi and Roger
Abou-Mourad intend to build a Car Wash on their property located at 3813 Stinson Avenue. City
Code requires them to first obtain a Conditional Use Permit. Action required. (pp. 31-60)
VI. POSTPONED APPLICATIONS
1. None.
VII. REPORTS,PRESENTATIONS, and/or CONCEPT REVIEWS
1. CONCEPT REVIEW. Murphy's Service Center, Inc. (Conoco Gas Station), 3501 29'" Ave.,
seeks a variance for a larger replacement sign for their business. No action required. (pp. 61-83)
2. PRESENTATION. A representative of WSB Engineering will make a presentation regarding the
selection of decorative street lighting along 29`h avenue. Staff and the consultant will seek
comments from residents and a recommendation from the Commission toward identifying a
preferred lighting style. Possible action required. (p.'84)
VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS
1. 2000 Local Water Resources Management Plan Grant Application. No action required. (pp. 85-
89)
2. Report from a representative of the City's consulting engineer,WSB, regarding stormwater issues
for 37th Avenue area/Street Reconstruction Program update. No action required. (pp. 90-91)
IX. COMMISSION INPUT
1. Commissioners comments.
X. ADJOURNMENT .
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
0.3 JUNE 20, 2000
4 7:00 p.m.
5. CALL TO ORDER.
6 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
7 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
8 Chair Bergstrom invited the Commission and audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
9 ROLL CALL.
10 Present: Chair Bergstrom; Commissioners Tillmann, Hanson, Thomas,
11 Melsha, Hatch, and Stille.
12 Commissioners absent: None.
13 Also present: Spencer A. Isom, Assistant City Manager.
14 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE
15 FOLLOWING ITEMS:
16 None.
17 I. PUBLIC INPUT.
• 8 Chair Bergstrom invited anyone from the. audience to provide general input to the Planning
�9 Commission. Hearing no response, Chair Bergstrom moved forward with the Agenda.
20 II. MINUTES.
21 Motion by Tillmann,second by Melsha,to approve the May 16,2000 Planning Commission meeting
22 minutes with the following changes.
23 Page 3, Line 19, change "Stille"to "Melsha."
24 Page 11, Line 7, change "watershed"to"renovation of older homes."
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26 III. COMMUNICATION FROM CITY COUNCIL.
27 None.
28 IV. REQUESTS FOR POSTPONEMENTS OR WITHDRAWALS OF APPLICATIONS.
29 None.
30 V. NEW APPLICATIONS/PUBLIC HEARINGS.
31 1. Public Hearing 4004 Fordham Drive Lot Width and Lot Area Variance Request.
32 Chair Bergstrom opened the Public Hearing at 7:05 p.m. Bergstrom requested a report from
33 Staff.
r34 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reviewed for the Commission that David and Pauletta
.35 Sperry were again seeking a variance for their property at 4004 Fordham Drive. The
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
• Page 2
1 Commission and City Council have previously heard(May 18 and May 25, 1999) and granted the
2 Sperry's request for a variance. However,the variance has expired because the variance is only
3 in effect for one year. City Attorney Soth:has advised Staff that the Sperry's must complete a
4 new Petition for variance and begin the process anew. A Concept Review'on.this matter was
5 held at the May 16, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting.
6 Chair Bergstrom invited Mr. and Mrs. Sperry to address the Commission. Mr. Sperry, 4004
7 Fordham Drive, said he was in attendance to ask for a lot width and area variance and reiterated
8 that the issue had been reviewed at an earlier Planning Commission meeting in May 2000. Mr.
9 Sperry presented a depiction of the proposed plan and he reviewed in detail for the Commission
10 the specific plans in mind.
11 Melsha inquired if Mr. Sperry had received additional neighborhood input from last year.about
12 the project. Mr. Sperry stated that he had not received any objections.
13 Bergstrom thanked Mr. Sperry and invited anyone else in the audience to speak.
14 In that respect, Bob Graham, 4024 Fordham Drive, addressed the Commission and mentioned
15. that the City Council had made a promise not to issue variances until the flooding issue has been
• 5 resolved. He mentioned that the Commission had issued several variances since.that time and-he
. J was concerned about the health and safety of the residents when heavy rains are experienced and
18 flooding has occurred.
19 Jeff Arnolds,4009 Shamrock Drive, would like for the Sperrys to keep in mind a water
20 management plan for the stormwater runoff. He stated that he hoped that the Sperrys would
21 possibly implement some landscaping to help resolve any pooling of water.
22 Asking for any additional input from the audience and hearing none, Chair Bergstrom closed the
23 Public Hearing at 7:14 p.m.
24 Chair Bergstrom asked for comments from the Commissioners.
25' Thomas commented that the Planning Commission has addressed the flooding issue. Bergstrom
26 commented that the Planning Commission has been asking residents to infiltrate the water runoff
27 into their yards to help alleviate the storm water issue. Bergstrom said the City is going to great
28 lengths in constructing and redesigning the City's stormwater runoff to move away from the City,
29 but at this time, the City is requesting that residents try to direct the stormwater into yards.
30 Bergstrom acknowledged that the variance request of the Sperrys had been previously approved,
31 and basically the request before the Planning Commission was an extension of time for Mr. and
32 Mrs. Sperry. Additionally, Bergstrom stated that the City has a commitment to provide a 100-
3 year flood protection for every resident in the City.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 3
•
1 Motion by Stille, second by Thomas, to approve a 15-foot lot variance and a 1,015 lot coverage
2 variance due to the following reasons: (1)the property cannot be put to reasonable use with the
3 current zoning; (2)the lot is unique in nature (3) the landowner did not cause the uniqueness; and .
4 (4)the variance will be in the spirit of the.Zoning Code and will not alter the surrounding
5 environment.
6 Motion carried unanimously.
7 Bergstrom reminded the Sperrys that this issue would before the City Council on June 27, 2000.
8 He would encourage Mr. and Mrs. Sperry to attend the meeting to answer questions.
9 2. Public Hearing: AT&T Wireless for 2801 37th Avenue NE.
10 Chair Bergstrom opened the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m.
11 Chair Bergstrom requested a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Isom stated that AT&T
12 Wireless Services was applying for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a new 75-foot cellular
13 monopole to be placed on an industrial zoned property at 2801 37th Avenue NE. AT&T has
14 obtained permission from the owner of the property, who was present at the meeting. This would
15 be the second such monopole on this property, with the first being owned by US West Wireless
5 Services.
17 Bergstrom invited Julie Townsend, AT&T Wireless, to address the Commission. Ms. Townsend
18 stated that she was present to request a conditional use permit on behalf of AT&T Wireless
19 Services, to allow for a 75 foot monopole at the property located at 2801 37th Avenue NE. She
20 stated she had brought pictures as requested at the Concept Review in May, and in that respect,
21 she showed the photographs for the Commissioners to review.
22 Ms. Townsend stated that the proposed equipment building is expected to be 12" x 28" and
23 would be made of a material that will match the building and can be painted the same color. The
24 monopole would be standing next to the equipment shelter. The shelter and monopole can be
25 situated to meet any setback requirements to the real property line. The assumed property line is
26 along a fence, so a variance was not needed.
27 Thomas inquired if there had been any further discussion about building a tower that was 100
28 foot tall, or the possibility of building a pole of 75 feet,with the capacity to add on an additional
29 25 feet. This would be in the case that any other wireless services wished to place a monopole in
30 the area.
31 Melsha inquired if any fiu ther discussions had been achieved with US West about co-locating the
32 monopole. Ms. Townsend said discussions did continue,but a standstill was reached.
3 Chair Bergstrom called for any input from the audience, and hearing none, closed the Public
34 Hearing at 7:30 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 4
1 Bergstrom commented that he felt it was a positive step that AT&T Wireless was willing to
2 construct a larger pole than it needed in the case that the pole needed to be added onto at a future
3 date. .
4 Stille mentioned that at the last meeting, Commissioner Melsha had expressed an opinion that
5 the two organizations (US West and AT&T Wireless) should be able to work together in regard
6 to the placement of the monopole. Bergstrom acknowledged that this was a good possibility;
7 however, due to the fact that there was a specific request before the Commission from AT&T,
8 the Commission needed to move forward on this issue.
9 Isom stated that he was not aware of any requirements in the Conditional Use Permit that
10 incorporated rules in relation to companies working together.
11 Melsha said that placing any conditions with respect to working with US West regarding the
12 placement of the AT&T pole was not an option as this point, but placing certain conditions could
13 be considered for future requests. An example would be a condition of the CUP could be for the
14 parties to submit the request to arbitration if an agreement could not be reached.
15 Motion by Hanson, second by Thomas, to approve the Conditional Use Permit for AT&T
Wireless Services to build a new 75-foot monopole based on the following conditions: (1) the
•. monopole must be constructed that an additional 25-foot segment could be added in the future to
18 allow for another communications company to use the pole; and(2)the coloration of the pole
19 and accompanying equipment shelter must match the existing structure as closely as possible.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 Bergstrom reminded Ms. Townsend that this issue would be before the City Council at the
22 meeting on June 27, 2000, and he encouraged her to be at the meeting to answer any questions.
23 3. Public Hearing: An Ordinance amendment relating to Lot Coverage and Building to Land
24 Ration.
25 Chair Bergstrom opened the Public Hearing at 7:35 p.m.
26 Chair Bergstrom asked for a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Isom stated that this item
27 originated with the Planning Commission,and was brought before the City Council on May 9,
28 2000. At that point, Mayor Cavanaugh directed Staff to return the issue to the Planning
29 Commission for official approval. If approval to the Ordinance is given by the Planning
30 Commission, the issue will return to the City Council on June 27,2000.
31 Isom requested that Commissioner Tillmann provide a brief summary. Tillmann stated that the
32 lot coverage ordinance was proposed to change in two ways: (1) decks would not be included as
• I part of the lot coverage ratio if the surface of the deck and the area below the deck was a pervious
k4 surface; and (2) to create a two-tier lot coverage limit. In this respect, lots over 9,000 square feet
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 5
1 would retain the current 35% lot coverage ratio, and the lot coverage ratio would increase to 40%
2 for lots at or under 9,000 square feet.
3 Tillmann continued by stating that an area would be added to the application for a building
4 permit that would require the applicant to specify a stormwater management plan for the project.
5 This specification needs to only be a short paragraph. Additionally,the applicant would be
6 provided with stormwater education materials.
7 Bergstrom called for input from the audience, and hearing none, closed the Public Hearing at
8 7:39 p.m.
9 Motion by Stille, second by Melsha,to approve Ordinance 2000-003, an Ordinance Relating to
10 Lot Coverage and Building to Land Ratio, amending Sections 1605 Subd. 44(a) and 1615.05,
11 Subd.8 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances.
12 Motion carried unanimouslv.
13 4. Public Hearing: Hillcrest Development's Preliminary Development Plan.
14 Chair Bergstrom opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m.
•'S
_o Chair Bergstrom requested a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Isom stated that Staff has
17 been working with Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban(Consulting Planners) regarding the Hillcrest
18 Development renovation of Apache Plaza. As explained in a memorandum in the Commission's
19 packets, Hillcrest Development has made an application for a Rezoning and Planned Unit
20 Development for Apache Plaza and certain surrounding properties to allow for the
21 redevelopment of the site as a commercial mixed use development. Specifically,the applicant
'22 proposes to redevelop the former Apache Plaza Shopping Center building for use by a mix of
23 tenants to include high technology office, general office,warehouse, light industrial and some
24 accessory retail uses, along with a future community space.
25 Bergstrom invited Anthony Gleekel, counsel for Hillcrest Development,to address the
26 Commission. Mr. Gleekel stated that the application has been resubmitted,but was the same in
27 many ways. For example,the exhibits are the same,but some of the narrative of the application
28 had changed. Mr. Gleekel stated that Hillcrest planned on meeting or exceeding the code
29 requirements raised, and a more specific landscape plan and detailed sizes,types of plantings and
30 then a phasing schedule that is being discussed will be more finalized in the future.
31 In regard to signage, Mr. Gleekel stated that Hillcrest has not finalized a signage plan,but will
32 coordinate the plan with existing ordinances.
33 Mr. Gleekel stated that the stormwater drainage issue is an on-going discussion,but that Hillcrest
• 4 has the same commitment to resolve this issue in the most satisfactory manner possible. He
s5 reiterated Hillcrest Development's commitment to meet and/or exceed the existing code
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 6
•
1 requirements. The timing, however,would need to be negotiated to construct the stormwater
2 improvement.
3 Bergstrom as Mr. Gleekel'to highlight the specific changes with regard to the application.
4 Mr. Gleekel said there has not been any substantive changes, except the traffic analysis,which
5 was included with the Commission packet. Mr. Gleekel stated that he would assure the
6 Commission that the document in question had addressed the issue of the New Market site as
7 was discussed at a prior meeting.
8 Bergstrom thanked Mr. Gleekel for his input and presentation.
9 Bergstrom invited Ms. Ellen Berkelhamer, Senior Planner,Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc.
10 to address the Commission.
11 Ms. Berkelhamer began by reviewing that the proposed uses for the site are a land-use
12 designation for mixed uses. In other words, all of the uses designated for that category would
13 apply and could be permitted. Hillcrest has submitted a list of uses that they would like to
14 develop a tenant base with, which was predominately general office tenants, and this is the
15 avenue Hillcrest would pursue. However, she stated that Hillcrest would like the opportunity to
115 build the space with other low-impact commercial uses in the case that general office is not
•_/. obtained.
18 She directed the Commission's attention to her memorandum of June 12, 2000, wherein the
19 recommendations of DSU were set forth on page 5, numbers 1 through 12.
20
21 Ms. Berkelhamer stated that stormwater is a significant issue and that Hillcrest is going beyond
22 what is required in terms of the site. Additionally, Hillcrest is working with an engineer and the .
23 Watershed District.
24 Stille inquired about Ms. Berkelhamer's earlier comment that DSU would recommend removal of
25 the pylon sign. Ms. Berkelhamer stated that it was simply DSU's recommendation for a
26 monument sign as opposed to a pylon sign, as an aesthetic preference. However, Hillcrest had
27 not submitted a signage plan to date:
28- After calling for any comments from the audience with relation to this issue and hearing none,
29 Chair Bergstrom closed the Public Hearing at 8:05 p.m.
30 Hatch had a concern about some of the permitted uses as it related to noise issues and traffic
31 patterns. Bergstrom said some of those concerns would be covered under the Performance
32 Standards, and a traffic report would shed some light on the traffic patterns.
• 3 Motion by Thomas, second by Hanson,to approve the application for rezoning from C-1 to
s4 Planned Unit Development(PUD) and for approval of the Preliminary PUD Plans, subject to
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 7
1 Condition Nos. 1-12 as contained in the DSU memorandum of June 12, 2000 and incorporated
2 herein by reference, as well as the information contained in the revised application package.
3 Motion carried unanimously:
4 Chair Bergstrom noted that this issue would be before the City Council at the meeting on
5 Tuesday, June 27, 2000 and he encouraged Hillcrest Development and related parties to attend
6 the meeting to answer questions and provide any information necessary.
7 5. Public Hearing: Tax Increment Financing Plan for Apache Plaza.
8 Chair Bergstrom opened the Public Hearing at 8:20 p.m.
9
10 Chair Bergstrom invited Mr. Steinman, Springsted, Public Finance Advisors, to address the
11 Commission. Mr. Steinman distributed an updated memorandum from what was presented in the
12 Commission's agenda packets.
13 Mr. Steinman continued by reviewing the memorandum in detail with the Commission, and the
14 Tax Increment Financing (TIF)plan for the property/site known as the Apache Plaza.
1
0 5 Thomas inquired of Mr. Steinman if any thought had been given to expanding the District over to
,i Stinson. Mr.•Steinman stated that he was not aware of any discussions to that effect.
17 Bergstrom inquired of Mr. Steinman if this project would affect the bond rating of the City; and
18 additionally he inquired about the worst case scenario financially for the City if the project goes
19 through as proposed.
20 Mr. Steinman stated that, as the concept is proposed, it does not include bonding for any portion
21 of the project. Bonding would be a limited possibility. Mr. Steinman stated that as far as a
22 financial risk to the City on this project,the risk was very low to the City.
23 Charles F. Habiger, representing the owners at 3813 Stinson Boulevard, approached the
24 Commission. One of the issues that his clients would like to address is that they would not be
25 opposed to Having the TIF District extended to include their site, but that there are historic
26 drainage patterns that affect their site.
27 Bergstrom directed Staff to work with Mr. Habiger on obtaining additional information with
28 regard to the issue.
29 After calling for additional input from the audience and hearing none, Chair Bergstrom closed
30 the Public Hearing at 8:37 p.m.
• I Motion by Melsha, second by Bergstrom,to approve the Tax Increment Financing (TIF)concept
.)2 as presented to the Planning Commission by Springsted, Public Financial Advisors.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 8
•
1 Motion carried unanimously.
2 VI.. . POSTPONED APPLICATIONS:
3 None.
4 Chair Bergstrom called for a recess at 8:35 p.m.
5 VII. REPORTS, PRESENTATIONS AND/OR CONCEPT REVIEWS.
6 Chair Bergstrom called the meeting to order at 8:45 p.m.
7 1. Concept Review: 2801 37th Avenue NE.
8 Chair Bergstrom asked for a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Isom reported that Mr.Ken
9 Solie, Owner of Village Properties, seeks to (1) Subdivide the land associated with Lot 2,Block 1,
10 Apache Plaza 3rd Addition; (2) Subdivide the land associated with Lot 1,Block 1, apache Terrace
11 Addition; and (3) Combine the original parcels remaining after the subdivisions into one lot. All
12 land in question is presently zoned LI. The existing industrial building will be on the combined lot.
13 Mr. Solie's intent is to sell the two outer lots.
14 Isom continued by stating that City Attorney Soth had been contacted to review this issue,and that
'5 Mr. Soth had recommended a Declaration of Restrictions Agreement. Such an agreement would
o. state,in essence,that the City would approve of the combining of the lots_and that the Owner would
17 take that information to the County.
18 Isom introduced Mr. Ken Solie, owner of Village Properties, and invited him to approach the
19 Commission. Mr. Solie stated that he is proposing to subdivide and recombine the land associated
20 with the Industrial Custom Products building at 2801 37th Avenue NE. Mr. Solie stated that with
21 reference to the proposed subdivisions, he is currently leasing a strip of land to the north of the
22 existing building from the CP Railroad to provide convenience parking for tenant employees. This
23 lease has been in place since at least 1979 and discussions with the railroad indicate that it is not
24 likely that the lease would ever be terminated. If it were terminated, however, he would have a
25 difficult time providing on site parking according to the Ordinance.
26 Consequently, Mr., Solie stated that at worst case, he would be forced to buy the land from the
27 railroad. Various discussion ensued regarding required parking spaces and City ordinance, and
28 options depending upon the outcome of discussions with the railroad.
29 In response to a comment by Hatch regarding the Livable Communities Grant,Bergstrom explained
30 to the audience that the City has submitted a grant request to do a future land study for a large area,
31 but that the City is not targeting any particular parcel. Additionally the Metropolitan Council has
32 grant programs for doing long-term studies. Both of these properties are inside the area, but have
33 not been specifically targeted by the study.
•
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 9
•
1 Bergstrom noted that Mr. Solie's next step was tc coordinate with Assistant City Manager Isom to
2 move.forward with the project. The issue would probably be on the Planning Commission's agenda
3 for next month.
4 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Solie for the concept review and presentation.
5 2. Concept Review: 2501 37th Avenue NE.
6 Chair Bergstrom requested a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Isom reported that the
7 applicant, Dr. Terry Rapacz, was seeking to expand his clinic by purchasing a proposed parcel of
8 land from Mr. Ken Solie, Owner of Village Properties.
9 In this respect, Mr. Art Brown, Prudential Real Estate, approached the Commission and presented
10 the detailed plans for the expansion of Apache Animal Hospital.
11 Jeff Agnes, architect, approached the Commission and reviewed in detail the plans presented. His
12 presentation depicted a 4,000 to 5,000 foot building, and stated that Dr. Rapacz was considering
13 using some residential features for the building in order to coordinate with the residential character
14 of the surrounding area. In that respect,Mr. Agnes presented an artist's rendering of the proposed
15 building, which incorporated certain residential features into the exterior.
9 .,-6 Bergstrom acknowledged that he was in support that the,design was of a residential nature, and he
17 is pleased that there would not be any significant grading in the area.
18 Isom noted that currently the Commission is simply looking at rezoning the property and to
19 combining the lots. Once discussions have been accomplished with the railroad, additional
20 information will be obtained and a return to the Commission.would be in order.
21 Various discussion ensued about additions to existing buildings that have been grandfathered into
22 the existing Code.
23 Thomas inquired of Mr.Agnes if decorative lighting was planned for the building. Mr.Agnes stated
24 that lighting is part of the architecture planned.and that Dr. Rapacz would enjoy working with the
25 City on attractive and decorative lighting to compliment what the-City has planned for the area.
26 Thomas inquired if the City needed to be concerned about a building-to-lot ratio. Bergstrom
27 confumed that required was only for residential property.
28 Bergstrom encouraged Dr. Terry Rapacz and his staff to work with Spencer Isom in'implementing
29 the proposed project.
30 3. Concert Review: 3259 Stinson Boulevard.
1 Chair Bergstrom asked for a report from Staff.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 10
1 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reported that the applicant,Tony Farah,was seeking to expand
2 the building at 3259 Stinson Boulevard onto the adjacent lot at 3245 Stinson Boulevard. Therefore,
3 said expansion requires a petition for rezoning of 3245 Stinson Boulevard from R2 to C. In addition,
4 the lots should be combined via a "Declaration of Restrictions agreement as drafted by the City
5 Attorney. Staff has attempted to contact the owner regarding the content of the submittal,but was
6 not successful. In addition, the applicant, Tony Farah, was not in attendance at the Commission
7 meeting.
8 Bergstrom noted that this issue would be tabled.
9 4. Concept Review: 2654 Kenzie Terrace.
10 Chair Bergstrom requested a report from Staff.
11 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom noted that James Abbott, Associate Pastor, had submitted a
12 June 12 communication (in Commission agenda packets) for locating the Frontline Church and
13 Outreach Center in the commercial property at 2654 Kenzie Terrace. The relocation would require
14 a petition for amendment of the zoning ordinance (adding a church as a conditional use in a C
15 district) and permit for conditional use. The Church does not own the property; therefore, they
16 cannot serve without the written permission from the owners, as the applicant.
•j/ Bill Arrigoni, Senior Pastor of Frontline Church, was introduced and invited to approach the
18 Commission.
19 Mr.Arrigoni stated that the Church had secured a purchase agreement of the property. Mr.Arrigoni
20 presented a sketch of the current building and surrounding area. Additionally,various information
21 regarding the Church was distributed to the Commissioners for review. The Church is currently
22 located in Roseville. Mr. Arrigoni stated that there would be extensive landscaping to the existing
23 building, as well as a significant amount of renovation. There would not be any curb cuts, as there
24 are some currently on the property. On the southwest corner,brickwork would be instituted to give
25 the building a pleasing appearance. A street-side sign would be located by the entrance from Kenzie
26 Terrace. The northeast corner of the building would also be used for an entrance, but would be
27 considered the back of the building and additional landscaping would be implemented to spruce up
28 the property.
29 In response to Mr. Stille:s question regarding parking, Mr. Arrigoni stated that the Church's total
30 membership, including children,would be at approximately 150. Additionally,the interior of the
31 building would seat approximately 240, so adequate parking was currently in place. If additional
32 parking was needed in the future,the Church would investigate other sources.
33 Stille inquired about funding for the renovation,and Mr.Arrigoni responded that they have a funding
34 source in place through the Church's bank. The monies are in place and the renovation could begin
35 soon.
•
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 11
1 Mr.Arrigoni said the target date for closing is November 1 and he would consider a minimum of 90
2 days for renovations. The earliest occupation date for the building, depending upon certain
3 circumstances,would be February,-2001.
4 Thomas inquired if the proposed street sign would be in the right of way. Mr. Arrigoni said the
5 Church is working with a sign person and the Church would stay within the required Codes in
6 relation to the sign. Mr.Arrigoni stated he is aware that the Codes are for the safety of the residents
7 and the Church has every intention of following the Codes to the greatest extent.
8 Hanson inquired if Mr. Arrigoni had a concern about the front door of the Church being in close
9 proximity to the street. Mr. Arrigoni stated that he believed the front door is 30-35 feet from the
10 street,but a possibility would be to close the door off with some landscaping. Mr. Arrigoni stated
11 the issue had not been considered by the Church at this point, but in response to the concern, the
12 Church would be interested in hearing suggestions.
13 Mrs. Lisa Arrigoni pointed out that there was a ramp along the front of the building complete with
14 landscaping that could help to alleviate the concern about the close proximately to the street.
15 Bergstrom noted that City ordinances do not include Churches in commercial districts because the
• 5 City has felt that Churches and commercial districts do not support each other. The City is looking
: 1 to provide land use that is both compatible and supportive of the other uses. Bergstrom stated that
18 both entities stand independent,and that since the property.is zoned commercial,the City searches
19 for businesses that support commercial.
20 Bergstrom stated that most- or all - of the City's churches are located in the residential area of the
21 City, as opposed to the commercial. Bergstrom cautioned Mr. Arrigoni that the request might be
22 difficult to achieve.
23 Mr. Arrigoni stated that the building is free standing, so it would be possible for the zoning to be
24 reconsidered, particularly in light of the fact that the residential area of Autumn Woods is nearby.
25 Mr. Arrigoni stated that he is encouraged to bring an updated building.and to maintain a presence
26 in the City. Mr.Arrigoni stated that he felt that.the Church would bring positive visions to the.City
27 and he would appreciate it if the Commission would provide the Church a serious consideration to
28 amending the zoning for this particular area.
29 Tillmann said her first reaction was concern about how the property would fit in with the community
30 green space with the St. Anthony Shopping Center and Village Green space. She would be
31 interested in Mr. Arrigoni's ideas with regard to how the Church would compliment that space.
32 Mr. Arrigoni stated that the Church is interested in working with the City and would like to review
3 the plans in order to blend and compliment the City's vision.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
• Page 12
1 Bergstrom stated that Mr. Arrigoni could obtain a copy of the concept plan of the St. Anthony
2 Shopping Center from Assistant City Manager Isom.
3 Hanson wished to direct Staff to work with the City's Consultant(Dick Krier)regarding obtaining
4 some ideas from regarding incorporating the Church into the vision of the St. Anthony Shopping
5 Center. Additionally, since the Church is non profit, that building would not generate the
6 commercial tax income that a commercial building would generate. The City has made a
7 commitment to keeping the St.Anthony Shopping Center a commercial entity,and he believed that
8 issue should be reviewed.
9 Thomas echoed Hanson's comments, but stated he was torn because the Church would be located
10 in a commercial as well as a residential area. Thomas would like to review the issue further in detail.
11 Melsha shared Hanson's concerns, yet stated that there is the possibility of increasing the usage of
12 St. Anthony Shopping Center and the green space by having the Church in close proximity.
13 Hatch mentioned that the architect could be asked to modify the entrances so as to alleviate the flow
14 of traffic.
0 5 A gentleman from Krause Anderson, the landlord for the Hamline Shopping Center where the
.6 Church is currently located, wished to acknowledge the Church's excellent record as a tenant. He
17 stated that the Church has done an excellent job in renovating the space and the area the Church
18 occupies is quite impressive. The other tenants in the building are impressed with the Church as a
19 tenant, and the landlord stated the Church would be an excellent addition to the City.
20 Stille echoed Melsha's comments regarding the synergy the Church could bring to the St. Anthony
21 Shopping Center.
22 Mr.Arrigoni continued his presentation by explaining the programs the Church offers to its members
23 and various outreach programs in which the Church has become involved.
24 Isom wished, to clarify for the Commission that this is not a site-specific request because the
25 Planning Commission would be allowing churches citywide throughout the district,and then the City
26 would then issue a conditional use permit within the zone.
27 Basically, Isom stated that the Commission would be deciding if the City wished to add churches
28 as a permitted use under a commercial district,because currently churches are a permitted use under
29 a residential use.
30 Isom noted that he had spoken with City Attorney William Soth and it was determined that the only
t 31 way this project could proceed would be for the City to modify the conditional use permit
? requirements of the City's zoning code.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 13
I. Isom clarified that the owner of the property needed to forward a letter to Staff stating that the
2 - Church can act on behalf of the owner. After that process, an application must be submitted for
3 rezoning.and would require three readings before the City Council..Due to the nature.of the matter,
4 Isom noted it would not be likely that City Manager would waive the first two readings.
5 Bergstrom acknowledged that the next step would be to work with the property owner and put
6 together an application for rezoning. Isom stated that he would provide the application and it would
7 be up to Mr. Arrigoni to decide how to present the issue.
8 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr.Arrigoni and the members of the Church for attending the meeting and
9 providing input.
10 : 5. Concept Review: 3813 Stinson Boulevard NE.
11 Chair Bergstrom requested a report from Staff
12 Assistant City Manager Isom explained the issue of building a Fuel Mart Car Wash on the property
13 at 3813 Stinson Boulevard,NE and is zoned C. This would require a permit for conditional use.
14 Since the owners own the adjacent commercial property(Fuel Mart),if the Commission wishes,they
15 would be willing to combine the two lots into one. If the lots are combined, then it would also
6 require a Declaration of Restrictions.
•
17 Chair Bergstrom introduced Mr. Charles F. Habiger, HKS Associates, in attendance to represent
18 Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad. Messrs. Abou-Mourad wished to build a cash wash and have
19 submitted an application to that extent.
20 Regarding watershed issues, Mr. Habiger stated that the site,under the RCWD,has to be 2'h acres
21 and within 1,000 feet of a protected wetland, or the site is located in the flood plain. Additionally,
22 the site is not increasing the amount of impervious surfaces.
23 Mr. Habiger stated that, if approval is received, construction would start almost immediately.
24 Regarding consolidation of the two parcels of property, it is his understanding that there are two
25 separate mortgages by two different lending institutions, and at some point, there could be one
26 financing package that would cover both parcels. Consolidation could be accomplished if the City
27 Council and Planning Commission so desire.
28 Tillmann inquired if there was enough business in that area to support another car wash.
29 Mr. Habiger stated that the other facilities are somewhat different. One of the other facilities is a
30 full-service car wash, and the other is a self-service car wash, and what Messrs. Abou-Mourad are
31 proposing is a drive-through car wash.
• 2 Thomas mentioned that the building proposed is not aesthetically pleasing and he was not sure that
33 the building was compatible with what is proposed for the area. He personally felt that a restaurant
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 14
1 of sorts would be more desirable and was unsure of the neighborhood's reaction to another car wash
2 in the area.
3 Stille inquired if the existing structure (the fuel building) would be renovated. Mr. Abou-Mourad_.
4 stated that at this time, simply the car wash was being reviewed, and possibly in the future, a
5 renovation would be considered.
6 Hatch suggested that the Commission receive additional detail on proposed landscaping if this issue
7 were to come before the Commission-again.
8 Mr. Habiger announced that the car wash would have a pylon sign. Bergstrom requested that Mr.
9 Habiger work with Assistant City Manager Isom regarding the City's requirements for signage. Isom
10 noted that the City allows a gas station one pylon sign.
11 Various discussion ensued regarding the combination of the two lots and the advantages and/or
12 disadvantages to the City of such combination.
13 Bergstrom noted that some of the developers in the area have met with the Silver Lake Homeowners
14 Association and discussed any proposed projects. Although Bergstrom stated that the suggestion
• 15 could not be given as a requirement,it would be an excellent suggestion that Messrs.Abou-Mourad
6 and Mr. Habiger meet with the Association to obtain input and provide information.
17 In response to an inquiry if the facade of the building could be improved to be more aesthetically
18 pleasing, Mr. Habiger stated that the architect would be involved and improvements would be
19 considered.
20 Jerry Kuske, who was in the audience, stated that he represented Don's Car Wash. He stated that
21 the hours of operation have been developed to match lifestyles and needs of the surrounding
22 residents. This is due to the fact,he stated,that certain warning bells or sounds must be used in order
23 to alert people to the starting of machines.
24 Bergstrom stated that he would like for the applicant to specifically address that issue in the
25 application, and that certain conditions and requirements could be implemented in the conditional
26 use permit to that effect.
27 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Habiger and Messrs. Abou-Mourad.
28 VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS.
29 1. Uydate on RCWD's permit No. 9611.
30 The update was provided for the Commission's information and Assistant City Manager Isom did
31 not have any further comments.
032 2. Livable Communities Demonstration Grant Application and Resolution No. 00-051.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 15
1 Assistant City Manager Isom distributed a handout regarding this issue for the Commission's review.
2 3. Sample of a Planned Unit Development Agreement.
3 A sample of a potential Planned Unit Development Agreement was distributed to the Commissioners.
4 for review.
5 IX. COMMISSIONER INPUT.
6 Bergstrom announced he will be the Planning Commission representative to the June 27,2000 City
7 Council meeting.
8 1. Commissioner Comments.
9 Stille did not have any comments.
10 Hatch commented that he had obtained a copy of an ordinance from a nearby city with regard to the
11 placing of cellular antennas and the requirement that companies work together. Hatch suggested a
12 possible action for the future that the Commission could take to implement an ordinance requiring
13 companies to work together.
• 14 Hatch continued by stating that he had become aware of a,planning grant application and that might
15 be related to some recent issues. Bergstrom requested that Hatch receive some of the particulars of
16 the application and subsequently requested that Assistant City Manager Isom place the information
17 into the Commission's meeting packages for next month.
18 Bergstrom commented that recently he attended a League of Minnesota Cities meeting,and become
19 aware of a company that assists cities in siting communications towers. The company would
20 inventory all of the City's property,and then make an evaluation of its applicability for the siting of
21 antennas.
22 Additionally,the company would assist the City in rewriting ordinances. Then,the company would
23 build the towers, charge rent to companies who use them, and then split the income with the City.
24 Bergstrom stated that possibly a moratorium should be recommended with regard to placement of
25 antenna towers until the Commission and City have had*a chance to work out a plan.
26 Bergstrom requested that Hatch provide a copy of the proposed ordinance he had obtained to
27 Assistant City Manager Isom for distribution to the other Commissioners.
28 Isom stated he would research the issue of towers and antennas, and investigate what other cities
29 have done.
30 Melsha did not have a comment,except to say that he agrees with the concept to review a proposed
31 ordinance for handling communication issues.,
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page 16
1 Thomas agreed that a recommendation could be made to the City Council to have a 60- or 90-day
2 moratorium on the issue.
3 On another issue;Thomas commented about the issue of the Frontline Church relocation. Thomas
4 suggested that if the Commission decided to move ahead with the Church's request, that the
5 Commission should investigate if other communities have faced this issue and the outcome.
6 Additionally,Thomas mentioned that it would be beneficial if the Commission had specific design
7 standards that could be referred to when speaking with developers regarding potential new projects.
8 Hanson commented that he understood that the City has had discussions with the individuals
9 regarding the Frontline Church project. Additionally,Hanson would like an explanation as to why
10 the Commission had not heard about the plans for the water issue north of 37th Avenue.
11 Bergstrom directed Assistant City Manager Isom to obtain a report on such issue, and stated that
12 there is a study being done currently with regard to the stormwater issue. Additionally,Bergstrom
13 will discuss this issue with City Manager Michael Mornson.
14
15 Tillmann inquired if the City had considered purchasing the Custom Liquidators property. Isom
1.6 noted that he was not aware of any such discussions.,
•
17 X. ADJOURNMENT.
18 Motion by Melsha, second by Hatch, to adjourn the meeting at 11:25 p.m..
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20 Respectfully submitted,
21 Sue Selseth
22 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 JUNE 27, 2000
4 7:00 p.m.
5 I. CALL TO ORDER.
6 Mayor Cavanaugh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
7 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
8 Mayor Cavanaugh invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
9
10 III. ROLL CALL.
11 Councilmembers present: Mayor Cavanaugh; Councilmembers Sparks, Thuesen, Horst and
12 Hodson
13 Councilmembers absent: None
14 Also present: City Manager Michael Momson; City Attorney William Soth.
15 IV. APPROVAL OF JUNE 27,2000 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA.
16 Motion by Hodson to approve the June 27, 2000 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda as
17 presented.
18 Motion carried unanimously.
g19 V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
0 A. Proclamation Declaring National Ni hg t Out.
' 21 Mayor Cavanaugh reviewed for the audience and Council that the National Association of Town
22 Watch ("NATW") was sponsoring a unique, nationwide crime and drug prevention program on
23 August 1, 2000 called "National Night Out."
24 This National Night Out program provides a unique opportunity for St. Anthony to join forces
25 with thousands of other communities across the country in promoting cooperative,police-
26 community crime and drug prevention efforts.
27 Motion by Sparks to approve the Proclamation wherein the City Council of the City of St.
28 Anthony hereby calls upon all citizens of the City of St. Anthony to join the St. Anthony Police
29 Department and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting the."17th Annual
30 National Night Out" on August 1,2000.
31 Motion carried unanimously
32 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
33 Cavanaugh called for input from the audience and hearing none,moved forward with the agenda.
34 VII. CONSENT AGENDA.
35 Motion by Thuesen to approve the Consent Agenda which consisted of:
106 1. Regular Council Meeting Minutes of June 13, 2000;.
37 2. Licenses and Permits;
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 2
1 3. Claims;
2. 4 Five pages of Verified Claims..
3
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
6 None.
7 IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
8 A. Resolution 00-052 re: Middle Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Bylaws.
9 Cavanaugh requested background information from City Manager Michael Mornson.
10 Mornson reported.that the Middle Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization
11 ("MMRWMO") is in the process of amending the Joint Cooperative Agreement by changing the
12 boundary of the MMRWMO to be consistent with the boundary of the new Capital Region
13 Watershed District("CRWD"). Currently, a portion of Falcon Heights which is in the
14 MMRWMO was also included in the new CRWD. The boundary change has been agreed to by
15 Falcon Heights and the MMRWMO Board and would result in Falcon Heights being removed
16 from the MMRWMO.
17 It has been requested that each member community review and comment on the draft capital
18 budget by August 1, 2000.
19 Motion by Sparks to approve Resolution 00-052, a Resolution Approving Changes to the Bylaws
20 of the Middle Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization.
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22 B. Resolution 00-053 re: Right of Way Permit and Facilily Use Agreement with Metricom,
23 Inc.
24 Cavanaugh requested a report from City Manager Michael Mornson.
25 Mornson stated that Metricom is seeking, via a "-Right-of-Way Permit and Facility Use
26 Agreement," the use/access of City-owned and NSP-owned street light poles, light fixtures, and
27 other structures within the Public rights of way. NSP has entered into a Master Lease Agreement
28 with Metricom. City Attorney Soth has reviewed the proposed agreement, and his letter of June
29 7, 2000 (which includes comments and recommendations), is enclosed in the Council's agenda
30 packets.
31 Cavanaugh introduced Bill Buell, President of Metricom, and invited him to address the Council.
�2 Mr. Buell began by stating that Metricom is a national company and is excited about wireless
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 3
1 internet connection. Furthermore, Metricom utilizes an external modem and the use of an
2 antenna.is utilized to access the internet. Additionally, it can be used in a network situation as
3 well. .In order to accomplish this wireless connection and provide a service to the community,
4 shoebox-sized radios are attached to street lights. The power for the radios is tapped from
5 existing photo sensors on the street light. The radios can also be attached to power poles.
6 Metricom does not plan to add any new poles or do any trenching in the right of way; however,
7 Metricom will need to use the City's right of ways in order to access the light poles and power
8 poles.
9 Mr. Buell stated that his purpose for attending the Council meeting was to request a right-of-way
10 permit and facility use agreement. If such approval is obtained, Metricom would then provide
11 the City with a map showing the poles that are to be utilized for placement of the radios. Mr.
12 'Buell explained that Metricom is simply a service company and does not provide software-of any
13 type.
14 Various questions were fielded from the Council regarding the specific details of Metricom and
15 the type of service it supplied.
16 Thuesen noted that Mr. Buell had mentioned that approximately 3% of the light poles in the City
407 would be utilized for the radios. Thuesen inquired if the poles on main streets, or side streets,
8 would be mostly utilized for the radios. His concern was the new, decorative lighting that is
19 being considered by the Council for some of the City's streets.
20 Mr. Buell explained that Metricom's goal is to cover the population, as opposed to the roads.
21 Generally, he stated, busy streets are avoided and decorative lighting is taken into consideration.
22 Horst inquired if the residents' security had been considered as an issue with respect to wireless
23 transmission.
24 Mr. Buell stated that wireless is usually considered more secure than wire lines (such as phone
25 lines).
26 Soth wished to clarify the last paragraph of Assistant City Manager Isom's memo of June 19,
27 2000. He wished to clarify that, although the memo implies to the contrary, he did not review the
28 agreement drafted by the attorney for the North Suburban Cable Commission,
29 Motion by Sparks to approve Resolution 00-053, a Resolution Approving a Right-of-Way Permit
30 and Facility Use Agreement with Metricom, Inc.
31 Motion carried unanimously.
•
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 4
1 C. Ordinance 2000-004 re: Curfews (1st Reading).
2 Cavanaugh explained that this proposed Ordinance is simply a rewrite and update of the City's
3 existing curfew ordinance. This rewrite is being done in order to bring the City's curfew
4 ordinance into compliance with the Hennepin County Ordinance. Cavanaugh further explained
5 that a local resident brought the discrepancies between the two ordinances to the Council's
6 attention.
7 For the benefit of the audience, Sparks reviewed the essential elements of the Ordinance:
8 * Juveniles under 12 years of age have to be home weekdays by 9:00 p.m., and Friday and
9 Saturday, home by 10:00 p.m.
10 * Juveniles ages 12-14 have to be home 10:00 p.m. on weekdays, and home by 11:00 p.m.
11 on Friday and Saturday.
12 * Juveniles ages 15-17 have to be home by 11:00 p.m. on weekdays and home by midnight
13 on Friday and Saturday.
14 . Motion by Horst to approve the first reading of Ordinance 2000-004, an Ordinance Relating to
10 5 Juvenile Curfew, Amending Section 1105 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances.
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17 D. Ordinance 2000-006 re: Amend Ordinance Relating to Planned Unit Development Ord
18 Reading).
19 Cavanaugh invited John Shardlow, DSU,to approach the Council. Mr. Shardlow briefly
20 reviewed for the Council and audience that the proposed Ordinance is consistent with the May 2,
21 2000 update of the critical path for the planned unit development ordinance process and Hillcrest
22 Development's redevelopment of the Apache Plaza.
23 Additionally, Mr. Shardlow reviewed that a Planned Unit Development("PUD")would be a
24 separate floating zoning district that could be applied for anywhere in the community.
25 Furthermore,the zoning would be determined through the PUD process. It is important to
26 remember, Mr. Shardlow stated,that any development must be consistent with the
27 Comprehensive Plan.
28 Various discussion ensued amongst the Council and Mr. Shardlow with regard to the specifics of
29 the proposed Planned Unit Development and details of the proposed Ordinance.
30 Cavanaugh inquired if a development committee had been considered. Mr. Shardlow stated that
•31 consideration had been given to have the Planning Commission Chair, Assistant City Manager,
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
Page 5
•
1 City Attorney, and Mr. Shardlow on a committ ee.
2 Mornson reaffirmed that a committee has.been.considered and stated that the proposed members
3 of the Committee were set forth in Assistant City Manager Isom's critical path document(which
4 was included in the Council's meeting agenda packets for informational purposes).
5 Motion by Cavanaugh to approve the Third Reading of Ordinance 2000-006, an Ordinance
6 Relating to Zoning and Planned Unit Developments; Amending Section 1655 of the St. Anthony
7 Code of Ordinances in its Entirety.
8 Motion carried unanimously.
9 X. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
10 A. Planniniz Commission Report from Meeting of June 20; 2000.
11 1. David and Paulette Sperryfor 4004 Fordham Drive, Lot Width and Lot Variance
12 Requests.
13 Cavanaugh invited Doug Bergstrom, Chair of the Planning Commission,to address the
14 Council. Mr. Bergstrom reviewed for the Council that David and Paulette Sperry were
seeking a variance request(for the second time) for their property at 4004 Fordham Drive.
16 The Commission and City had previously heard and granted the Sperry's request for a
17 variance in May of 1999. However, Mr. and Mrs. Sperry, due to a variety of reasons,
18 were not able to act on the variance and build the house they had planned to construct.
19 Consequently, the variance has expired(effective for one year only), and Mr. and Mrs.
20 Sperry have had to begin the variance process over again.
21 Mr. Bergstrom stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing in regard to
22 this matter, and that two residents had approached the Commission. One resident's
23 concern centered around the stormwater runoff from the new home to be constructed.
24 The other's concern was the issuance of variance requests until the flooding issues had
25 been resolved. Otherwise, Mr. Bergstrom stated, it appeared that the Sperrys had
26 communicated with their neighbors and there did not appear to be any strong objections
27 to the proposed construction.
28 Cavanaugh noted that Staff and Council could review other community's policies for
29 future use.
30 Motion by Horst to approve the request of Mr. and Mrs. David Sperry of a 15-foot lot
31 variance and a 1,015 lot coverage variance, which include the findings of fact as noted by
32 the Planning Commission in their meeting minutes of June 20, 2000. Such findings of
3 fact are as follows: (1)the property cannot be put to reasonable use with the current
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 6
1 zoning; (2)the lot is unique in nature; (3) the landowner did not cause the uniqueness;
. 2 and (4) the variance will be in the spirit of the Zoning Code and will not alter the
3 surrounding environment.
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5 2. AT&T Wireless for 2801 - 37th Avenue NE; Conditional Use and Variance
6 Request.
7 Mr. Bergstrom reviewed for the Commission that AT&T Wireless Services had applied
8 for a Conditional USe Permit to.allow for a new 75-foot cellular monopole to be placed
9 on an industrial zoned property at 2801 37th Avenue NE. AT&T has obtained
10 permission from the owner of the property, and such pole would be the second monopole
11 on that property. The first pole in existence is owned by US West.
12 Mr. Bergstrom noted that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of a
13 Conditional Use Permit for the 75-foot based on the conditions as noted in the Planning
14 Commission meeting minutes of June 20, 2000.
15 Motion by Thuesen to approve the Conditional Use Permit of a 75-foot monopole, which
•6 would include all of the conditions as stated in the Planning Commission meeting
17 minutes of June 20, 2000. Those conditions include: (1) the monopole must be
18 constructed so that an additional 25-foot segment could be added in the future to allow
19 for another communications company to use the pole; and (2)the coloration of the pole
20 and accompanying equipment shelter must match the existing structure as closely as
21 possible.
22 Motion carried unanimously.
23 Bergstrom noted that the Planning Commission has been receiving similar requests for
24 cellular antennas and have requested Assistant City Manager Isom's assistance in
25 planning responses to those requests for the future.
26 3. Ordinance 2000-003 re: Amend Ordinance Relating to Lot Coverage and Building
27 to Land Ratio (1st Reading).
28 Mr. Bergstrom stated that the subject of lot coverage has been an issue with the Planning
29 Commission and local residents in recent months, and thus consideration of amending the
30 lot coverage ordinance was started.
31 Furthermore, Todd Hubmer, an engineer from WSB & Associates, had been contacted by
32 the Planning Commission to provide professional assistance in consideration of this issue.
�3 In addition, Commissioner Tillmann provided the Commission research on City
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 7
1 ordinances and policies.
2 Mr. Bergstrom noted that the Planning Commission.had proposed that the lot coverage
3 ordinance be changed in two ways: (1) decks would not be included as part of the lot
4 coverage ratio if the surface of the deck and.the area below the deck was a pervious
5 surface; and (2) to create a two-tier lot coverage limit. In that respect, lots over 9,000
6 square feet would retain the current 35% lot coverage ratio, and the lot coverage ratio
7 would increase to 40% for lots at or under 9,000 square feet.
8 Motion by Hodson to approve Ordinance 2000-003, an Ordinance Relating to Lot
9 Coverage and Building to Land Ratio, Amending Sections 1605 Subd. 44(a) and
10 1615.05., Subd. 8 of the 1993 St. Anthony Code of Ordinances.
11 Motion carried unanimoush.
12 Sparks acknowledged that the pursuit of this lot coverage ordinance change was an
13 excellent idea and she thanked the Planning Commission for following through on the
14 research and modifications to the Ordinance.
5 4. Consider Preliminary Plan for the Apache.Plaza Site Submitted by Hillcrest
16 Development.
17 Mr. Bergstrom noted that the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on this issue,
18 and he directed the Council's attention to several documents in the Council agenda
19 packets for their review and information relating to this issue.
20 John Shardlow, DSU, was invited to approach the Council. Mr. Shardlow began by
21 briefly reviewing the project. He stated that the Council would be considering an
22 application for rezoning and a preliminary Planned Unit Development("PUD") approval.
23 Said application was made by Hillcrest Development for property known as Apache.
24 Plaza,New Market, and Taco Bell Sites.
25 Mr. Shardlow noted that the primary focus of Hillcrest Development is to redevelop
26 Apache Plaza into a predominately high-tech office building. Additionally; Hillcrest
27 would like the flexibility to market the property to some kinds of uses that may be more
28 like manufacturing or warehousing. This has been the subject of a lot of discussion;
29 however those uses must not change materially the uses and character of the building.
30 There is still an interest on the part of Hillcrest to discuss some of those conditions.
31 Furthermore, Mr. Shardlow stated that Hillcrest has presented a landscape plan which is
32 appropriate in terms of the level of commitment Hillcrest has proposed. The firm of DSU
•33 has suggested some minimum standards and requested additional detail from Hillcrest.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 8
1 Additionally, Hillcrest has provided information regarding traffic.flow and patterns. DSU
2 has asked that a traffic study be completed and brought forward.
3 Mr. Shardlow said that with respect to project signage, Hillcrest was not in a position.to
4 provide information regarding signage because tenants have not been retained at this
5 point. In the future, however, this issue will be addressed.
6 Mr. Shardlow noted that water quality is a significant issue in the community. Hillcrest
7 has taken some steps towards remedying this situation, at least as far as Hillcrest's
8 responsibility is concerned. Again, Hillcrest intends on reviewing the situation and
9 complying with the requirements or exceeding the requirements as imposed by the
10 authorities.
11 Mr. Shardlow pointed the Council's attention to Page 122 of the Agenda Packets, wherein
12 there were 12 recommendations as provided by DSU. It was his understanding that the
13 Planning Commission voted to approve said recommendations at their June 20, 2000
14 meeting.
t15 Both Cavanaugh and Thuesen noted concerns regarding the differences between
16 warehouse/manufacturing space as opposed to an office high-tech space as it relates to a
17 final outcome of Apache Plaza.
18 Cavanaugh expressed his opinion that the preliminary plan noted was not in a form that
19 articulated the expectations of the Council.
20 Mr. Bergstrom approached the Council and explained the Planning Commission's view
21 and understanding on the issue.
22 Cavanaugh noted that the issues raised in the meeting are critical in the final planning
23 stages.
24 Thuesen expressed his agreement that the Council must be cautious about the types of
25 businesses that are retained as tenants for Apache Plaza, either on a temporary or
26 permanent basis.
27 Mr. Shardlow explained that some of the concerns and issues needed to be raised and
28 discussed with the applicant(Hillcrest Development). Mr. Shardlow continued by stating
29 that it is his opinion that Hillcrest Development has proven itself to be honest and upfront
30 about plans and expectations. It would be Mr. Shardlow's advice to discuss some of the
•31 issues with the applicant.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 9
1 Various discussion ensued between the Councilmembers, Mr. Shardlow and Mr.
2 Bergstrom regarding possible restrictions for the plan and/or the best plan for the City to
3 consider.
4 Mr. Shardlow said an idea would be to specify some uses as conditional uses. Hillcrest
5 would like to structure an approval and go forward with that approval to fill the building
6 with tenants.
7 Cavanaugh inquired about the time consequences if this issue was returned to the
8 Planning Commission for further review. City Manager Mornson stated that it would
9 delay the issue from 2-4 weeks, but it would still be possible to accomplish the goals
10 already set. The issue would return to the Planning Commission meeting on July 18,
11 2000, and would then.be passed back to the City Council at a Council meeting after that
12 date.
13 Anthony Gleekel, attorney for Hillcrest Development, approached the Council. He stated
14 that he understood the Council's concerns and expressed Hillcrest Development's position
15 on the issue. Additionally, he stated that the plan in question was not intended to be final
16 because there are many issues left to be studied and resolved. Additionally, Hillcrest's
07 goal is to present a final approval, along with a specific PUD agreement. Mr. Gleekel
8 explained that Hillcrest would be targeting office-high tech tenants; however, Hillcrest
19 would like the opportunity to be flexible in their tenant base. Additionally, conditions
20 could be placed regarding the details of the exterior of the building if certain types of
21 tenants, such as warehouse/manufacturing, were obtained.
22 Cavanaugh suggested finalizing the discussions at the Council meeting today in a
23 document so that some definition could be obtained regarding the feelings of the
24 Councilmembers.
25 Cavanaugh asked Mr. Shardlow his opinion about sending this issue back to Planning
26 Commission. Mr. Shardlow stated that whether it is sent back or not, the same language
27 needs to be incorporated into the document. In essence, he would support sending the
28 issue back to the Planning Commission.
29 The consensus of the Council was that the issue should be returned to the Planning
30 Commission for further review and consideration.
31 Cavanaugh directed City Manager Michael Morrison to manage the process of getting the
32 issue returned to the Planning Session, as well as institute a work session for the Council,
33 if necessary.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
Page 10
1 Mr. Gleekel suggested that a committee be organized to review the details of the plan.
2 City.Manager Michael Morrison had some ideas,as to the members of the committee.
3 Motion by Horst to table the plan, return the issue to the Planning Commission, and to
4 implement a committee.
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6 Cavanaugh asked Mr. Bergstrom about the locating of Frontline Church to the City, which was
7 discussed at the Planning Commission meeting on June 20, 2000. Mr. Bergstrom reviewed for
8 the Council that the Church was seeking to relocate the Church and Outreach Center to the
9 commercial property at 2654 Kenzie Terrace. This relocation would require a petition for
10 amendment of the zoning ordinance and permit for conditional use. The Planning Commission
11 had noted, and the Council agreed, that this request would be difficult to achieve.
12 City Attorney Soth advised that the Planning Commission should review the issue in full detail,
13 and have findings for denying or approving the request. Then, the Council should approve or
14 deny the request with specific findings as to the decision.
5 Morrison requested that Mr. Bergstrom be the Planning Commission liaison to the City Council
16 at the July 25, 2000 City Council meeting due to his familiarity with the issues and discussions
17 that ensued at this Council meeting. Additionally, Morrison wished to thank Mr. Bergstrom for
18 negotiating the process of obtaining the firm of DSU to assist in the Hillcrest redevelopment of
19 Apache Plaza.
20 B. Peter Willenbring of WSB & Associates, Inc. Will Present and Update on General
21 Engineering Projects.
22 1. Resolution 00-055 re: Harding Street Storm Water Improvements.
23 Cavanaugh welcomed Peter Willenbring of WSB & Associates and invited him to
24 address the Council. Mr. Willenbring provided a brief background of the project. A
25 public information meeting was field on June 7,2000 with the owners affected by the
26 proposed'Harding Street Storm Water Improvement project. This meeting was a follow
27 up to the February 29th meeting
28 Jeane Garene, Landscape Architect, and she has been working with the resident group
29 and WSB regarding landscaping of the project. Ms. Garene directed the Council's
30 attention to the landscaping plan, as included in the Council's agenda packets. Ms.
31 Garene stated that the proposed plan would be an amenity for the residents and provided
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 11
1 for long, native grass that would not be mowed. This was an ideal choice because of the
2 slope of the land.- Some residents were concerned about the geese population, and Ms.
3 Garene stated that the issue had been taken into consideration when developing the plan._.
4 Ms. Garene stated that it was the resident's desire to begin the project as soon as possible.
5 Her firm's recommendation would be to obtain a contractor that is experienced in native
6 seeding, together with a three-year maintenance contract to ensure the success of the
7 seeding.
8 Additionally, Ms. Garene wished to point out that various trees and shrubs are depicted
9 on the drawing she presented, and will be incorporated with the native seeding. The
10 residents wished for the overall feeling of the area to be of woodlands.
11 Mr. Willenbring directed the Council's attention to a proposed schedule of the project that
12 was included in the Council's agenda packets.
13 City Attorney Soth wished to mention that if the Council plans to proceed with the
14 project this year, it would be necessary to begin a condemnation proceeding on all the
15 properties immediately. If in the meantime, if residents decide to sell their property, that
•6 would be the most beneficial for the City. But, if there were residents who do not plan to
17 sell their property, then the condemnation proceeding would need to be in place.
18 However, he stated that if the project were done next year, then the City would have
19 ample time to negotiate with the residents first, and the condemnation process last.
20 Some of the residents in the audience expressed surprise at the condemnation process.
21 Mr. Willenbring stated that since it had been the residents' desire to begin as soon as
22 possible, the condemnation process needed to be brought up and addressed. Mr.
23 Willenbring noted that the optimal time of year for construction is in the fall when
24 residents' windows are closed and noise would not be as much as an issue.
25 City Manager Michael Mornson and City Attorney Soth reviewed together the process
26 and requirements for condemnation proceedings and the optimal options for the City.
27 Horst thought that the City had initially agreed to offer a settlement to the homeowners
28 for their property. Mr. Soth said that was correct; however,the condemnation
29 proceedings must be implemented because of the time frame that it takes to complete that
30 process in the case that a settlement could not be obtained.
31 Mr. Soth stated the process of obtaining the land is by a property-by-property negotiation,
32 as well as a property-by-property condemnation proceeding. In other words, each
it3 individual property is negotiated separately from the others.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
® Page 12
1 Mr. Willenbring.noted that the resolution included in the Council's packets did not
2 include.any language relating to condemnation proceedings.
3 Cavanaugh reviewed the issue by stating that the Council has been made aware of a
4 possible condemnation process if the "willing seller, willing buyer" approach would not
5 work.
6 Mr. Soth stated there was one way to avoid beginning the condemnation process, and that
7 is to postpone the project until the fall of 2001 (since fall is the best time to start). This
8 would allow for ample time to negotiate settlements with sellers of property.
9 Cavanaugh stated he would hope the City could settle with "willing buyer, willing seller,"
10 but if not, the condemnation proceedings would be acted upon. It is a value to the
11 community to have a holding pond. Cavanaugh summed up by stating that if the
12 community wants quick construction of the pond,then condemnation is the best option
13 for uniform settlement.
-14 Mr. Soth clarified that he stated that condemnation needed to be started, but it would be
best for the City, and the residents if the negotiations never reached that point. In other
6 words, it would be to everyone's advantage to agree to a settlement, but condemnation
17 proceedings need to be started due to the time frame.
18 The other alternative about negotiating with residents over the fall and winter was
19 discussed, as opposed to beginning condemnation proceedings immediately and starting
20 construction in the fall of 2000.
21 Mr. Soth reminded the Council that there is one other option,which is to negotiate with
22 the residents, and begin the condemnation proceedings if necessary.
23 Mr. Willenbring reviewed that the residents had expressed an interest in beginning
24 construction right away; however,the residents were not aware at that time about the
25 possibility of condemnation proceedings.
26
27 A resident approached the Council and stated that delaying the project until the fall of
28 2001 makes sense because it would give the Council and residents time to negotiate.
29 Originally, he stated that the residents wanted the project to begin immediately; however,
30 none of the residents he rioted were aware of the condemnation process.
31 Another resident approached the Council and said that he had been told by the prior
40 2 Mayor that a fair settlement would be given. The resident was concerned that he would
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 13
1 be forced to have out-of-pocket expenses and still would not be fairly compensated for
2 his property. Mr. Soth reassured the resident that he would be fairly compensated either
3 by an agreement between the resident and the City, and if the process went to Court,then
4 he would be fairly compensated by the Court.
5 Bob Strakoda, an appraiser and commissioner from the audience spoke to the Council and
6 explained the process of the appraisal process for these types of situations, and reassured
7 the residents in attendance that they would be fairly compensated for their property.
8 Jeff Winker, 2813 30th Avenue, approached the Council and presented a drawing that
9 was shown at the February 29, 2000 neighborhood meeting.
10 Motion by-Horst to approve Resolution 00-055, a Resolution Ordering Property
11 Appraisals, Purchase of Easements, and Preparation of Final Plans for Storm Water
12 Improvements at Harding Street, wherein the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
13 authorizes:
14 * The appraisal of affected properties for the purposes of acquiring drainage,
15 ponding, and utility easements;
06 City to acquire uire necessary easements for construction of storm water
q
17 improvements; and
18 * WSB & Associates to prepare final plans and specifications for the proposed
19 improvements.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 Sparks mentioned that she would like to review any proposed maintenance agreements,
22 and she would like to ensure that high quality standards would be used in the construction
23 of the project. Sparks wished to recognize the sacrifice that the residents are making.
24 Motion by Horst to extend the meeting time past 10:30 p.m.
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26 2. Resolution 00-056 re: Order Feasibility Report on 2001 Street and Utility
27 Improvements.
28 Motion by Horst to approve Resolution 00-056, a Resolution Ordering Preparation of
29 Report on Improvement wherein the City Council of St. Anthony authorizes the proposed
0 improvement to be referred to WSB & Associates for study and that they are instructed to
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 14
1 report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way
2 as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and as
3 to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other
4 improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6 Mr. Willenbring reviewed the remainder of the memorandum with the Council outlining
7 a list of projects that are currently ongoing within the City.
8 Mayor Cavanaugh thanked Mr. Willenbring for his presentation.
9 C. City Manager.
10 1. City Manager Michael Momson reported that a proposal would be received from
11 Mary Ann Jacobson regarding the grant proposal for Central Park.
12 2. The skate park proposal as submitted by the Parks Commission will be deferred to
13 the Council meeting on August 8, 2000.
04 3. There will be a survey in the Summer Newsletter regarding having one garbage
15 hauler for the City. .
16 4. The lighting proposal for 29th Avenue NE will be available July 19-25.
17 5. The current plan for the green space for the St. Anthony Shopping Center will be
18 presented by Dick Krier on July 11, 2000 at the City Council meeting.
19 6. Autumn Woods would be making a proposal for expansion of the facility on the
20 property. Updates would be forthcoming to the Councilmembers.
21 7. Mayor Cavanaugh and the St. Anthony Chamber of Commerce have sent letters to
22 Herbergers' corporate office regarding the redevelopment of Apache Plaza.
23 8. Evaluations regarding Silver Lake will be in the Council boxes soon.
24 9. Morrison reviewed the upcoming issues for the Planning Commission in July.
25 10. The City's Fire Chief is negotiating with the City of Roseville regarding an
26 Automatic Fire Response Contract.
•
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 27, 2000
• Page 15
1 XI. REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS.
2 Hodson met with the.Silver Lake Homeowners Association and the consensus to work with the
3 Council in establishing a long-term relationship.regarding water.quality. The Councilmembers
4 would be receiving a letter soon regarding the results of that meeting.
5 Horst wished to express his appreciation for the Planning Commission working late last week,
6 and to the Chamber of Commerce for writing the letter to Herbergers last week. Additionally,
7 Horst was planning on attending the Metropolitan Council breakfast.
8 Thuesen did not have a report.
9 Sparks noted that there is a VillageFest meeting at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday evening at City Hall.
10 Additionally, Sparks noted that there has been another complaint about speeders on 30th.
11 Apparently, a resident ran over a skateboard and, luckily,there was not a child on the skateboard.
12 However, it is about the third time that the resident has complained about speeding. A thought
13 was to put up the radar sign along that street so that residents could see the speeds.
14 Cavanaugh acknowledged that the golf notice has been mailed and he said that it looks like a
05 great outing. In connection with The National Night Out, Cavanaugh mentioned that
16 Councilmembers have, in the past, agreed to sign up for specific blocks.
17 XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
18 None.
19 XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
20 Motion by Horst to adjourn the meeting at 10:52 p.m.
21 Respectfully submitted,
22 Sue Selseth
23 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
24
25 Mayor
26 ATTEST: 0aw 4"-Z2
27 City Clerk
28
•
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY DRAFT
2 PARKS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
3 JULY 10, 2000
4 7:00 p.m.
5 I. CALL TO ORDER.
6 Chair Jindra called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. and welcomed everyone in attendance.
7 II. ROLL CALL.
8 Present: Chair Carol Jindra, Commissioners George Wagner, Julie Gebhardt,
9 Colleen Hallada, Daniel Ganley,.and Jan Jenson.
10 Absent: None.
11 Also Present: Public Works Director Jay Hartman, Representative from School
12 Board Denise Dunn, Representative from Community Services Diane
13 Skrivseth; Representative from Sports Boosters George Zurbey; City
14 Council Liaison Amy Sparks.
15 III. APPROVE JUNE 12,2000 PARKS COMMISSION MINUTES.
•16 Motion by Zurbey, second by Hallada, to approve the June 12, 2000'Parks Commission
17 Meeting Minutes with the following changes:
18 Page 1, Line 22, change "baseball" to "soccer"
19 Page 4, Line 9, change "July" to "June"
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 IV. DISCUSS CENTRAL PARK REDEVELOPMENT,WATER TOWER PARK AND
22 SILVER POINT PARK PUNCH LIST ITEMS.
23 Chair Jindra introduced Mr. Bob Kost, BRW, and invited him to address the Commission.
24 Mr. Kost stated he would begin the discussion with Central Park redevelopment, and in that
25 respect, drew the Commission's attention to a handout,which depicted the design de-
26 velopment cost estimate of the Park. Mr. Kost stated that some retaining walls have been
27 determined to be needed due to the sloping of the land. This will help with maintenance and
28 with part of the trail system. Upon discussions with the engineer, some mill and overlay
29 work were being considered for the existing park parking lot. Curb repair will be part of the
30 project as well.
31 Mr. Kost continued his report by stating that, since the last meeting, a prefabricated restroom
32 and concessions facility had been considered-- as opposed to the building discussed at an
•33 earlier meeting-- and a copy of the photographs for such facility were presented to the
34 Commissioners. The prefabricated facility depicted in the photographs would be installed
35 and plumbed,together with electricity.
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes
July 10, 2000
Page 2
l In response to Chair Jindra's question regarding the difference between the prefabricated
2 building as opposed to what was considered before, Mr. Kost stated that difference is that the
3 prefabricated building has smaller space requirements and is not custom built. It allows for
4 additional flexibility.
5 Mr. Kost mentioned that the trails would be constructed so that maintenance vehicles would
6 be able to drive on the trail as necessary. Jenson mentioned the importance of vehicles being
7 able to have access to the trails for deliveries to the concession stand, among other things.
8 In response to some concern regarding the estimated cost of the redevelopment, Mr. Kost
9 stated that many items on the cost estimate were optional; however, BRW wished to present
10 the Commissioners with the best possible scenario for the Park and allow for reductions from
11 that point.
12 In response to an inquiry by Hallada regarding the cost of the building considered prior to
13 this meeting, Mr. Kost stated that the cost of the custom bathroom/concession stand would
14 have been approximately $50,000 once the fixtures were added. The prefabricated
15 bathroom/concession stand is estimated at$80,000; however Mr. Kost stated that a goal was
•16 to.have a building that would have an attractive appearance, durability, and easily
17 maintained.
18 Mr. Kost and the Commission reviewed a sketch of a floor plan for the bathroom facility and
19 various discussion ensued regarding potential modifications of the floor plan and bathroom.
20 Lighting of the park was discussed, and Koehntop mentioned the possibility that lighting
21 would not be needed on a regular basis due to Daylight Savings Time. He mentioned the
22 potential cost of the lighting as well. Sports Boosters Representative George Zurbey
23 mentioned that most parks are utilized until approximately 10:00 p.m., and due to the fact
24 that it starts to get dark by 9:00 p.m., lights could be an important feature. Jenson agreed,
25 particularly due to the fact that lighting requirements would be needed into the fall as
26 Daylight Savings Time decreases.
27 The location-- and the amount of lights--was discussed, bearing in mind the close proximity
28 of the surrounding residents.
29 Jenson mentioned that he would like to particularly discuss lighting on two fields, which
30 would result in a figure of$160,000, as opposed to a figure of$280,000 which was
31 mentioned on the redevelopment cost estimate.
•32 Mr. Kost mentioned that the Commission had previously discussed lighting the hockey rink,
33 and additionally inquired of the Commissioners if lighting on the trail would be considered.
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes DRAFT
July 10, 2000
• Page 3
1 Various options for lighting of the hockey rink were discussed, as well as the time of day
2 when the Park would close-and the lights turned off.
3 Jindra inquired about some potential solar lighting for the trails. Mr. Kost stated that the
4 problem with that type of system is due to the unpredictable weather of Minnesota. It would
5 confuse residents to have lighting at some times, and not others.
6 To review, Mr. Kost confirmed that two fields would utilize lighting, as well as the hockey
7 rink.
8 Mr. Ted Severson, 2504 33rd Avenue NE, was in the audience and noted that he has had
9 difficulty obtaining satisfactory results to his concerns about obtaining the soccer fields that -
10 the soccer program needs. He stated that he has talked with City Hall, many residents, and
11 the Parks Commission and is frustrated by the lack of results.
12 Chair Jindra wished to clarify that Mr. Severson has attended meetings of the Parks
13 Commission and has been allowed to speak substantially about his concerns and the issues
14 surrounding the lack of field space. However, all programs have had to make concessions
15 due to the lack of space and the Commission is working diligently to provide the City with
�6 the maximum amount of space possible and accommodate both the baseball and soccer
17 programs as well.
18 Jenson wished to clarify that, particularly in connection with Silver Point Park, that a lot of
19 the capacity for the in-house program has been lost. Baseball has had to make concessions,
20 along with the soccer program.
21 Mr. Severson stated that he wanted to be guaranteed a soccer field in order to schedule the
22 appropriate games and practices. Jindra stated that this plan is still in the process of being
23 created and his concerns and communications are being considered, along with other issues.
24 Ganley mentioned that trust and communication must be relied upon, and he felt that both
25 have been provided. Additionally,he stated that cooperation must be implemented in order
26 for trust and communication to continue.
27 Mr. Kost clarified that the discussion taking place surrounded a field management issue and
28 was not the issue intended to be discussed at the meeting regarding redevelopment of Central
29 Park.
30 It was determined to continue with the discussion of Central Park redevelopment, and Mr.
31 Kost continued by reviewing the'punch list items with the Commissioners. These items
0 2 included-a review of the aggressive skate facility,high school soccer fields, softball fields,
3 sledding hill, and other issues.
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes D L�1 11
July 10, 2000
• Page 4
1 The implementation of horseshoe pits as noted on the cost estimate was discussed because
2 horseshoe pits already exist at another park. Other options were considered instead of
3 horseshoe pits.
4 The Commissioners held a discussion regarding the turf to be implemented on the fields.
5 Additionally, Mr. Kost pointed out that the old wading pool would be demolished and a new
6 one built. Furthermore, sand volleyball was discussed for the Park as noted on the cost
7 estimate, as well as shuffleboard.
8 Specific details were discussed and reviewed, such as drinking fountain(s),benches, litter
9 receptacles, bike racks, and park signs.
10 Zurbey inquired if the Commission was being asked to approve the Central Park plan as pre-
11 sented. Mr. Kost mentioned that it would be beneficial to have the plan approved so that it
12 could be presented as sort of an unveiling at the VillageFest celebration.
13 Zurbey noted that he planned on taking the plan presented by BRW to the Sports Boosters
14 with the understanding that there would be some field rotation and some scheduling
15 information.
01.6 Jindra wished to state that she a reciated Mr. Severson's attendance and input. She did wish
PP P
17 to clarify, however, that the Parks Commission was not involved in field management and
18 field scheduling.
19 Mr. Severson agreed and noted that he wanted to work together with the residents and the
20 Parks Commission in making Central Park successful.
21 Mr. Kost said that a laminated board with the proposed Central Park redevelopment plan
22 would be made up to place at VillageFest. Comment cards were suggested to be placed
23 appropriately so that residents could make comments about the proposed plan.
24 Jindra mentioned that the timeframe question has been mentioned repeatedly by residents
25 regarding the park. Discussion ensured regarding the best time to close the park in order to
26 begin reconstruction and it was mentioned that possibly sometime in June 2001.
27 Jenson recommended that Zurbey discuss possible funding issues with the Sports Boosters
28 and the level of commitment of funding in which the organization is interested.
29 Jindra reviewed that the Commission would approve the plan as presented with changes as
30 discussed at the meeting, and that a laminated board would be presented at VillageFest
1 depicting the proposed plan. Wagner and Jenson agreed that the City Council should review
2 the Plan prior to presenting it as a proposal at VillageFest.
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes
July 10, 2000
Page 5
1 It was noted that a City Council meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, July 11, and it was sug-
2 gested that City Council liaison Amy Sparks bring the issue to the Council at that meeting.
3 Ganley mentioned that this was only a proposed plan. However, Wagner expressed his
4 opinion that the City Council should be aware of the plan prior to presentation at VillageFest.
5 Discussion ensued about the issue of presenting the plan at the VillageFest celebration, and it
6 was determined that it must be clearly stated that the plan was simply a "proposed" plan.
7 Amy Sparks mentioned that she would announce to the City Council at the meeting on July
8 11, 2000 that the Parks Commission was planning on posting the proposed plan at
9 VillageFest. Mr. Kost noted that he and his associate, Augie Wong, would be willing to
10 attend a City Council meeting and explain the plan and developments of Central Park.
11 Jindra noted that Silver Point Park and Water Tower Park were both on the agenda. Mr. Kost
12 noted that WSB & Associates was in charge of Silver Point Park, and that issue would be
13 tabled.
�
4 Augie Wong, BRW, noted some punch list items of Water Tower Park that required the
15 Commission's attention. He reviewed a list with the Commissioners and provided an update
16 to outstanding issues. Details such as raising the basketball hoop, and some restriping,
17 bathroom repaving, were discussed. Mr. Wong noted some minor issues that needed to be
18 reviewed for the playground area..
19 Jindra noted that on May 20, 1999, the remaining play equipment was ordered and is yet to
20 be received. Mr. Wong stated that he has determined that the company is awaiting a safety
21 approval of the remaining equipment. Mr. Wong stated that he planned on meeting with
22 Flannigans (the company from which the equipment was ordered), and with Public Works
23 Director Jay Hartman.
24 Mi. Wong stated he would work with Flannigans to ensure a satisfactory resolution.
25 V. REPORTS.
26 A. Community Services.
27 Diane Skrivseth stated that Community Services does not meet during the summer.
28 B. School Board.
29 Denise Dunn will be attending.a meeting on Tuesday, July 11,2000 and will report back to
30 the Commission at the Commission's next meeting.
•31 C. worts Boosters.
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes DRAFT
July 10, 2000
•. Page 6 4
l George Zurbey will be meeting with the Sports Boosters,will present the proposed plan, and
2 report back to the Commission at the next meeting.
3
4 VI.' OTHER BUSINESS.
5 Jindra noted that the Parks Commission's next meeting was scheduled for August 14, 2000.
6 Ganley noted that Hennepin County Parks would occupy a trailer for the VillageFest
7 celebration. He suggested that the Parks Commission coordinate an effort with the Hennepin
8 County Parks for VillageFest.
9 VIII. ADJOURNMENT.
10 Motion by Ganley, second by Hallada, to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
11 Motion carried unanimously.
12 Respectfully submitted,
13 Sue Selseth
14 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
•
1
MEMORANDUM
• DATE: 7/12/00 MEETING DATE: 7/18/00
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Assistant.City Manager Isom
RE: Request to postpone public hearing for Hillcrest Development's preliminary and final
development plans.
Hillcrest Development's preliminary development plan for the Apache Plaza that includes a rezoning from "C"
district to a PUD. The applicant has requested this hearing be postponed until after a special meeting of the
Planning Commission can be held in either the City Hall conference or multi-purpose room. The Commission,
at said special meeting, will also hear Hillcrest's final development plan for the Apache Plaza. Therefore, the
Development Review Committee asks that the Commission move to accept this request, thus scheduling said
Special meeting for August 1, 2000 or at such time thereafter as deemed appropriate by the Development
Review Committee. Action required.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Commission make a motion to accept the request and schedule
a special meeting Tuesday, August 1, 2000 at 7:00pm.
Cc: ' City Clerk Kroeplin
•
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 7/11/00
TO: City Manager Mornson
FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom�/1-
RE: UPDATE OF THE CRITICAL PATH FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,(PUD)
ORDINANCE/PROCESS AND HIL7.[WST DEVELOPMENT'S REDEVELOPMENT OF
APACHE PLAZA PROPERTY
To date the"Critical Path"is amended as follows:
Critical Path/Important Dates
DEW Complete Task
4/18/00 4118/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission approved an amendment-to. the
Comprehensive Plan. Commission to ask Hillcrest to withdraw their request for
zoning map change and zoning code amendment.
4/25100 4/25/00 City Council meeting. Council to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
4/27100 4/26/00 Planning Consultant. Consultant to submit"Application for Comprehensive Plan
• Amendment"to Metropolitan Council. Planning Consultant to facilitate the approval
of said amendment.
5/2/00 5/2/00 Planning Commission work session. Commission to hold work session with Planning
Consultant,sta$and Hillcrest to discuss the draft PUD ordinance and process.
5/9100 5/10100 Planning Consultant Consultant to submit final PUD ordinance and related forms
applications,etc.to staff Said ordinance and related documents shall be"approved
as to form"by City Attorney Soth. Additionally,Consultant to work with Hillcrest to
prepare them for the PUD process.
5/15/00 5/15/00 City Council work session. Council to hold work session with Planning Commission
Representative,Planning Consultant,staff and Hillcrest to discuss PUD ordinance and
process.
5116/00 5/16/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear PUD ordinance. Commission,
Consultant,and staff to hold/hear Hillcrest Development's"Application Conference'
and"Sketch Plan:
5123/00 5/23/00 City Council meeting. City Council to hear the PUD ordinance(one reading).
616100 6/6/00 Planning Commission work session. Commission to hold work session with Planning
Consultant,sta$and Bllcrest.
•
3
2
6/20100 6/20/00 Planning Commission meeting. Commission to hear(Public Hearing)"Preliminary
Development Plan"(PUD/site specific)and make recommendations for approval or
denial of said plan. Commission also to hear(Public Hearing)plan for Tax Increment
Financing(TIF).
6/27/00 . 6/27100 City Council meetin& Council to hear Preliminary Development Plan (PUD/site
specific).
NOTE. Council referred Preliminary Plan back to the Planning Commission.
7/19100 ---- Planning Commission meeting. Applicant will request that the Commission hold a
special meeting August 1, 2000 to re visit, via public hearing, the Preliminary
Development Plan(PUD/site specific)to include rezoning of the Apache Plaza from
"C'district to PUD designation. The applicant also requests that the Commission also
review the Final Development Plan during said special meeting.
8/1= ---- Planning Commission"special"meeting. Commission to hold public hearing on the
Preliminary and Final Development Plans to include rezoning of the Apache.Plaza
from"C"district to PUD designation.
&/8100 --- City Council meeting. Council to rehear Preliminary Development Plan(PUD/site
specific) to include rezoning of the Apache Plaza from "C" district to PUD
designation.
8//22/00 -- City Council meeting. Council to hear Final Development Plan(building specific),
• findings of fact consistent with approvall denial,and final PUD.agreement. .
The Development Review Committee for this project has been expanded to include:Mayor Cavanaugh,Mike Morrison,
Doug Bergstrom,John Shardlow,Bill Soth and me. John Shardlow is the point of contact for this project and is working
with City Attorney Soth,Hillcrest,and staff to meet all target dates. It should be noted that the"Critical Path/Important
Dates"may change depending on the outcomes of the Council and Commission meetings.
Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin
Planning Consultant Shardlow
City Attorney Soth
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 7/11/00
MEETING DATE: 7/18/00
TO: Planning Commission /
FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom f. 1
RE: Public Hearing. Frontline Church and Outreach Center. Petition for
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance.
Pastor Bill Arrigoni, representing the Frontline Church and Outreach Center, is asking the City to consider
adding a "Church" as a conditional use in a commercial district. Presently "Churches" are a permitted
conditional use in all R1, R2, R3, and R4 districts citywide. If this petition is approved/accepted, then
"Churches" will also be a permitted conditional use in "C" districts citywide.
The Frontline Church has entered into a purchase agreement for the property located at 2654 Kenzie Terrace
in the City of St. Anthony. If this petition is approved, the Frontline Church will subsequently submit an
"Application for Conditional Use Permit."
Staff Recommendasion: A completed "Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance" has been received by the
City. .Staff recommends the Commission either approves or denies the petition. If approved, then Staff will
draft the necessary Ordinance in preparation for the next City Council meeting.
Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin
5
Date:
Fee: $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Petition for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance
Applicant: �r"o.Z�ki Ne C:c. r-r- . -r O wA r ca-c-� -•'�c
Address: 7 R 1°� o�.���� 1 �oa��� �1 e , 11ti1� Phone: (6,S 3�- 5914
9" 55113
Request for change regarding: (check appropriate item(s))
Restrictions upon buildings, structures, or amenities
Permitted uses
— P,'**- Conditional uses
Affected zoning district: /��.�.� Izala _.5 as cow �1 1 r1
• Proposed change(s) and reason(s) therefor: (`A ►n0.; �'! o a r c—
C�Lkrc \ a Imp 1 !4 ca..-, bc.s'r— wee-%+ '-a l use. oss ' it
(x c 91 e C o
16 31
� t
(use additional sheet, if necessary)
•
Signature of pplic
. 6
FRONTLINE CHURCH & OUTREACH 75-562'/960- 6279
PH.651-636-2594 2007.182
2819 N.HAMLINE AVE.
Ryy1�OSEVILLE,MN 55113
$
PAY TO TH � -- '
o fir;
�G11N11[l/lfi
Nati
Wil 631-1-040
onal Bank 7
1501 YAW candy R.W C.R°n°Qc nw 55113
memo
1:0960056 241: 200748 2((' 06 279
ru NA[
N2 34656
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
RECEIVED OF /�
• - �`�/ Dollars
o CASH
W
v CHECK
A
I
O
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
3301 Iv Lake Rd. Phone(612)-789-6661
By
THANK YOU
•
•
June 29, 2000 Frontline Church
and Outreach Center
Spencer Isom
Assistant City Manager
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699
Dear Spencer,
We are submitting this letter in preparation for concept review and public hearing. Frontline
Church& Outreach Center has signed a purchase agreement for the property located at 2654
Kenzie Terrace in St. Anthony Village. We are aware that it is zoned commercial and requires a
petition for amendment to zoning ordinance and permit for conditional use in a commercial
district for the building to be used as a church. If the City Council would be so gracious as to
accept us in to the community of St. Anthony, we would like to use the facility for the purpose of
church assembly on the main floor and we would lease the basement level to a storage company.
• We established this church in March of 1994 and we have been leasing from Krause Anderson at
the Hamline Shopping Center for over five years. It has always been our desire to remain close
to the heart of the city since so many churches have moved out into the suburbs because of the
necessity growth brings. This facility would work well for us and we feel that we could be a
very positive addition to your fine community.
Our plans for this facility would be to make a complete renovation on the interior and exterior
before occupancy would take place. Our goal is to close November 1, 2000 and move in on
February 1, 2001. We will submit plans for new sidewalks,handicap ramp,parking lot
resurfacing, new signage, and beautiful landscaping that will compliment the St. Anthony
"Green-space Plan." We plan to spend approximately$75,000 on the exterior and$180,000 on
the interior. _
I would like to thank you and the Committee Members for the time and consideration that you
afforded us at the Planning Committee meeting on June 20, 2000. Enclosed you will find more
detailed information on our organization and our plans. Thank you once again for your
consideration.
Sincerely,
• Bill Arrigoni, for Frontline Church&Outreach Center
2819 Hamline Avenue.Roseville MN 55113
Frontline Church & Outreach Center 651.636.2594
Frontline Midway Church&Outreach Center
1571 University Avenue.St Paul MN 55104
651.659.0151
Narrative
I. Profile of Frontline Church
Senior Pastor: Bill Arrigoni graduate of Rhema Bible Training Center Tulsa, OK,
licensed and ordained with World Revival Network Kansas City; MO. Pastor for six
years, associate youth Pastor at Living Word Christian Center Brooklyn Park five years.
Staff. Two full-time and six part-time employees
Established: March 15` 1994
Membership: 150 people (45 families)
Socioeconomic: Primarily middle to upper middle class, racially mixed, per capita
giving is 50% above national average.
Demographic: Majority of adults 25-60, married with 3 children, youth group of 25,
residing in suburbs (Maplewood, Blaine, Ham Lake, Hastings, Champlin, Brooklyn Park,
Ramsey, Savage, Woodbury).
Subsequent Establishments: We established Frontline Midway Church and Outreach
Center on University Avenue in St. Paul January of 1999. This Outreach Center was
established as a church and a place of humanitarian activity for our entire organization.
Many of those whom we have helped are now faithful members of our Midway church.
II. Activities on site at 2654 Kenzie Terrace
General Services: Fridays at 7:00 pm & Sundays at 10:00 am
We would use this facility for church assembly, this would include music in the main
sanctuary where adults would assemble followed by a Biblical message. We
simultaneously provide ministry for all other ages (infants, toddlers, children,pre-teens,
and teens) in different meeting rooms throughout the facility.
Prayer Services: Thursdays at 7:00 pm
The whole congregation assembles together in the main sanctuary for corporate prayer
where we pray for our cities, nation, leaders as well as prayer requests from anyone in the
community.
1
• Youth Meetings (ages 13-18): Friday evenings at 7:00 and one Saturday per
month at 7:00 pm
Youth participate in worship and then hear a gospel message.
Vacation Bible.School: Usually in June or August forages 7-12
Children are invited from the community as well as our church and they join many fun
Bible oriented activities which teach them about God and how to live right. This is a five
day program which inspires children to follow the Lord and live godly lives.
Daily: Office hours are from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm
We normally staff the church offices Monday through Friday with two to three people
throughout the day to take care of general church business as well as ministry work.
III. Community Outreaches
Picnics:
We would like to do concerts in the park if permissible as well as open house picnics for
the Village of St. Anthony residents.
® Thanksgiving & Christmas:
We have had the privilege to spread good will to those in need on these special Holidays
by giving them plentiful food baskets which have been provided by our church,
community businesses and other churches. Last year we distributed 200 food baskets at
Thanksgiving and Christmas. We were also a Toys For Tots distributor at Christmas
time for families in need, many of which were local residents.
Helping Hands:
This ministry is somewhat of a spiritual S.W.A.T. Team. When someone in our
community informs us that they need any kind of help, spiritual or practical (food,
transportation, shelter, clothing, ect.) our team springs into action immediately to help
and to pray with people whether or not they have even visited our church. Last year this
ministry spent over$1000.00 in meeting.these types of needs throughout Roseville and
St. Paul, yet we plan to further expand this ministry. This type of work usually takes
place at the recipient's home or apartment, hospitals and nursing homes.
Community Involvement:
We are very interested in getting involved in community events since we consider
community relations to be a very important part of our purpose as a church.
2
10
IV. Organizational Vision
Church Planting:
We plan to continue to plant more pew churches in areas where they needed throughout
the Twin City Metropolitan area. Our motto is `Bring the church to the people
Evangelistic:
We have been very active in making a difference in our communities in which we have
been located. It is not our goal to transplant people but as I said"bring the church to the
people"to those who need or want a church. We do not believe in a style of outreach
which"outreaches its welcome". We seem to have plenty,of God's work coming to us
and we simply respond. Our outreaches in St. Paul have brought us before thugs, drug
addicts, alcoholics, prostitutes and some very moral people. We have worked with other
ministries, one of which is a ministry to prostitutes in St. Paul (Breaking Free) and we
have seen some phenomenal results.
Our ministry in St. Anthony Village will take on a flavor and form of its own, because we
will simply respond to the needs of this community. Frontline has no interest in drawing
any of those whom we have and are helping in the Midway area to the St. Anthony
Village. We simply would like to have the opportunity to be accepted into this great
community where we can take our place as a beacon for hope and good for all to see.
Missions:
We have been heavily involved in oversees missions work. We have brought three teams
to India during the last fifteen months,we ministered to children,pastors, and thousands
of people. The mission activities consisted of conducting meeting and distributing to the
needs of the people. We intend to continue to maintain and increase our missionary
activities.
Stated Purpose:
The purpose of the church as we see it, is to first minister to the spiritual and if necessary
physical needs of the membership, to bring them to a place of maturity in Christ Jesus.
Secondly we must provide the inspiration, training, and means to reach out to others.
This is the heart of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
3
11
V. Site Plan
Storm Water retention and drainage:
Although we will be doing quite extensive work on the exterior.of the building we will
not be affecting the grade of the lot. The site has very adequate storm sewer access at the
south side of the property as indicated on the site plan. The property has a steep grade
which will carry water swiftly to the storm sewer. The north side of the lot drains towards
Kenzie Terrace. We have no intention of introducing any new elements which would
encumber the flow of drainage water.
Demolition:
We intend to remove the following items from the property.
1. Sign and pole near front entrance.
2. Sign pole at north west corn_ er of building
3. Sign and pole at southwest corner near the rear of site.
4. Awning above front entrance.
Materials:
1. New awning made of canvas (color yet to be determined)
• 2. Parking lot resurfaced in asphalt.
3. Fence at rear southwest wood split rail.
4. Dumpster enclosure brown treated wood with colored fence gate.
5. Signage brick base identical to brick on front of building, letters metal
(color to be determined). Logo Flame& Sword sculpted metal.
6. Diamond shaped accents to soldier course in brickwork,metal (color
to be determined).
7. Additional brickwork on northwest corner of building brick identical
to.existing on front.
8. Sidewalks made of cement.
9. Landscaping walls on various planting beds constructed of landscaping
block in Buff color matching that in the rear of the property on truck
ramp.
10. Foliage for_planting beds will be a variety of shrubs plants flowers and
ornamental trees which will blend nicely with the existing landscaping
of adjacent properties and the St. Anthony"Green-space Plan".
Easements:
Frontline Church is willing to offer the city of St. Anthony an easement for a four-foot
walking path running down the westerly side of the property adjacent to the apartment
building.
•
4
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PAS
12
COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PURCUASE AGREEMENT
• pam; Mgy 30 2000
RECY✓NED OF Frontline Church and Outreach Ce ter the sum of onethousand 654 Kenzie Terra e
DOLLARS as earnest money and in part payment for the'. purchase of property
situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, ad legally described as follows: 1&t-002 Block
002 St. Anthony.VillaPrP CMRI GTR Addn No. 1 Pro ID: 0702923240020 and 0702923240021
together with the following personal property: NIA all of which property the.undersigned has this day
sold to the Buyer for the sum of: Six hundred and twent -five thousand dollars ($625.000.M DOLLARS,
which the Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: Barnest money herein paid as 11,000.00 upon lease
signature and V,000.000 ,upon removal of contingency#3 (See Addendum#1) as
additibnal earnest money and J57.000.00, cash on ur bcfoie Scvtembcr 1,
2001, the date of closing and the
balance of$5583000.00 by financing as shown on the attached addendum.
1. DEEDINURKETABLE TITLE: Subject to performance by the Buyer, the Seller agrees to execute
and deliver a general/marketahle Warranty Deed conveying marketable title to said premises subject
only to the following exceptions: (a) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal
regulations. (b) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of the premises without effective forfeiture
provision. (c) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. (d) Utility and
.drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements. (e) Rights of tenants as follows:
**See Attached Addendum
2. REAL, ESTATE TAXES. Real estate taxes due and payable in the year of closing shall be prorated
between Seller and Buyer on a calendar year basis to the actual date of closing unless otherwise provided
in this Agreement. Real estate taxes payable in the years prior to closing shall be paid by Seller. Real
estate taxes payable in the years subsequent to closing shall be paid by Buyer.
3. P 1 w SSESSNIENTS. r . efte.] ur
THE P AWE 9SIN6ISELbER �bL PAY en-the date-a€610sir+g fig-iestdiffieFfts ,.f Weal
assessfnsets-�ed for pttyineat with#te real estme taxes due-and payubje in awyeef ef elesing.
r
special assessme
Seller-shall pay eft date of 0094fig any defefFed-real-estme A
i.srequiredar, of dais GAb-
• 4. PROBATIONS. All items customarily prorated and adjusted in connection with the closing of the sale
of the property herein including but not limited to rents, operating expenses, interest on any d
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGDNI P4 13
commERcuL.IND'USTRIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT
• 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Page 2 of 5
assumed by Buyer, shall be prorated as of the date of closing. It shall be assumed that the Buyer will
own the property for the entire date of the closing,
5. DAMAGES TO REAL PROPERTY. If there is any loss or to the
the Seller. If the property is
hercuf and the date of closing, for any reason, the risk of loss shad be
destroyed or substantially damaged before the closing, this Purchase Agreement shall become null and
void, at Buyer's option. Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Purchase Agreement within 30 days
after Seller notifies Buyer of such damage. Upon said termination, the earnest money shall be refunded
to Buyer and Buyer and Seller agree to sign a cancellation of Purchase Agreement. .
6. EXAMINATION OF TITLE. Within a reasonable time after acceptance of this Agreement, Seller
shall furnish Buyer with an Abstract of Title or a Registered Property Abstract certified to date including
proper searches covering bankruptcies and State and Federal judgments, liens and levied and pending
Special absebslllonts. Buyer shall have 10 business days after receipt of the Abstract of Title or
Registered Property Abstract either to have Buyer's attorney examine the title and provide Seller with
written objections or, at Buyers own expense, to make an application for a title insurance policy and
notify Seller of the application. Buyer shall have 10 business days after receipt of the commitment for
title insurance to provide seller with a copy of the commitment and written objections. Buyer shall be
deemed to have waived any title objections not made within the applicable 10-day period set forth
above, except that this shall not operate as a waiver of Seller's covenant to deliver a Warranty Deed,
• unless a Warranty Deed is not specified above. If any objection is so made, Seller shall have 10 business
days from receipt of Buyer's written title objections to notify Buyer*of Seller's intention to make title
marketable within 120 dayb fruiu Seller's receipt of such written objection. If notice is given,payments
hereunder required shall be postponed pending correction of title, but upon correction of title and within
10 days after written notice to Buyer the parties shall perform this Purchase Agreement According td its
terms. If no such notice is given or if notice is given but title is not corrected within the time provided
forth, this Purchase Agreement shall be null and void, at option of Buyer; neither party shall be liable for
damages hereunder to the other and earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer; Buyer and Seller agree to
sign cancellation of Purchase Agreement. If title to the property to be found marketable or be so made
within said time, and Buyer shall default in any of the agreements and continue in default for a period of
10 days. Then and in that case the Seller may terminate this contract and on such termination all the
payments made upon this contract shall be retained by Seller as liquidatOd tlauiagcs, tiII1e being of the
essence. This provision shall not deprive either party of the right to enforce the specific performance of
this contract provided this contract has not been terminated and provided action to enforce such specific
performance shall be commenced within six months after such right of action shall arise.
7. POSSESSION.Seller shall deliver possession of the property on the date of closing.
8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. See attached addendum.
9. .TIME IS OF THE E85 NC E FOR ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS CONTRACT.
10. WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There are no wells. BUYER AND SELLER INITIAL:
• Buyer(s)�,. Seller(s)
11. ADDENDA.Attached are(2)addenda,which are made a part of this Agreement.
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI P 14
COMMERCIAL-INDUS'T'RIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT
• 2654 Kenzie Terrace
page 3 of S
12241SCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:
(a) Survival. All of the warranties, representations, and covenants of this Agreement shall survive and be
t;ttfon,eable after the closing.
(b) Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the
and supercedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the property.
There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement and no waiver of any of its terms will be
effective unless in a writing executed by the parties.
(c) Succesbors tend Assigns. If this Agreement is assigned, all provisions of this Agreement shall be binding
on successors and assigns.
13.ACCEPTANCE DEADLINE.This offer to purchase,unless accepted sooner, shall be null and void at 11:59 PM
June 5-400 and in such event all earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer.
NOTICE
Jim Stimmler Kraus-Anderson Realty Represents Seller
(Agent) (Company Name)
Represents
(Agent) (Cumtnu,y Nuroe)
•
THLS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD,SEEK COMPETENT ADVICE.
Dated:�� . Dated: to
SELLER BUYER
SELLER BUYER
Selling Agent
•
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI P
15
C0M1»RCLkL- DUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGREFZVMNT
2654 Kenzie Terrace
• Pagel of 5
ADDENDUM TO PUKCTHASE AGREEMENT 41
Dated: .May 30,2000
property Addrebb: 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Property ID: 0702923240020 and 07 240021
OFFER SUBJECT TO:
1. Obtaining successful bank tinancinga r-c e?�Alt ° t¢,.�•.l«
2. Building appraises for purchase price.
3. Obtaining special use permit for buyer's use; church and storage on bottom floor, as lease space.
4. Inspection by qualified professional on roof,foundation, mechanicals, electrical and plumbing. Seller
will bring into satisfactory working condition if any repaim are needed to comply with all local codes
and ordinances.
5. Subject to Buyer's and Seller's attorney's approval of purchase agreement within 10 days after
Buyer's and Seller's signatures of Purchase Agreement.
6. Buyer's review and acceptance of a well.disclosure statement.
t 7. Upon removal of Contingency#3 (obtaining a special use permit from the city of SL. Auttiony for said
use)Buyer will deposit ail additional$9,000.00 earnest money in a Kraus-Anderson trust account
within 10 business days of completion. Said trust account shall be an interest bearing account.
8. Upon signatures of Buyers and Sellers of this Purchase Agreement dated May 30, 2000, shall void
Purchase Agreement between same Buyer and Seller dated April 7,2000, A.Y+ril 1 R, 2000, and May 4,
2000, and earnest money of Purchase Agreement dated April 7,2000 shall be applied to purchase
agreement dated May 30, 2000.
9. Property shall remain on the market for sale until all contingencies have been removed. However, any
or all subsequent offers or purchase agreements shall be subject to cancellation of this agreement
agreed up on by the buyer.
10. Seller shall grant buyer the first right of first refusal on the sale of the second mortgage on the same
terms as acceptable to other purchaser.
11. Buyer will indemnify Seller for any costs/assessments to Seller related to the application to the City for
a special use permit. 4Q�(�'s-
12. First Right of Refusal: ForM&ys after the date of this agreement,Seller_will not enter into another
purchase agreement that activates Buyer's fiat right of refusal before September 1, 2000. Thereafter,
upon written notification to buyer that seller has received another acceptable offer,buyer shall remove
all contingencies(within 5 business days) and proceed to closing within 60 days or this purchase
agreement shall become null and void and all earnest money shall be returned to buyer with any
accumulated interest. The above closing date of 60 days after notification is contingent upon buyer
being released from its present lease at the Hamline Shopping Center, otherwise clusing date shall
occur September 1,2001. Seller shall pay all special assessments levied and including or payable prior
to September 1, 2000. Buyer shall Y&ly all special assessments levied or pending after September 1,
• 2000 as ordered by the City Council or other governmental assessing authorities. Buyer and Seller
shall prorate as of date of closing,real estate taxes due and rayshle in the year of closing.
07/11/2000 16:20 2225341 VK ARRIGONI PA 16
COMMERCIAIrINDUSTRIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT
• 2654 Kenzie Terrace
Page 5 of 5
ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT#2
Dated: May 30,2000
Property Adthess: 1,654 Kenzie Terrace
Property ID: _ 070292'i24(1n20 and 0702923240021
FINANCIAL ADDENDUM:
Purchase Price: $625,000.00
Cash at Closing: . -57,000-00
Bank Financing: 41 9,M)Q_00
Seller Financing: 150,000.00 by second mortgage, 5 year term. Payments to begin 90
(Note at a rate of 8-1/2%for days after closing, however., interest will accrue as of daw of
15 year amortization with a closing:
• balloon at end of 5"'year)
*Eamest money to be held in trust account by Kraus-Anderson (upon removal of contingencies, earnest
money to be transferred to interest bearing tnist account).
•
i r —
' I
rte! L� i
•
• '' ��_•_■� -.�-_� -�� ,.) J�� �r y-Tye ,I -
i
- �?¢••.'""�k�l-rt.,r'��a'S .T�'-+e._--fit .� _
Or
y -_
A,
Propertl* es Adjacent
North • -South West
r.
w _,•I� ~.n `r ��� l, i.r+,..�-�.n r c� - �T --,-
i--% •^ --�.sr„ -~' 3�Yn.G��p `1 .
;ter _• I ... -
ikk
North East
.�.✓sv,. t �� w' a,a'4�Jrti I i�'-'v s t i .r - .Ta` ,;`.Yd
Lid _
1
South
GSM. - ��
S 2's' y..a.. "'r.° w dt Vie) •r=---��.r>s w. r+tk, r"a�"C� �.�"
d h ,r,�
►AAtQ A T�
TLE �RVEY /
DETAIL �; \ aw.�. r. _•..�
_
• Fees y 0. '�•'••r r...r r•u L r�r
'. �• _ -. ?tcy�wf�r.+_ •°1°.�^•^f i..��Fr r.r u!r e•rq r rribrr•W•r -�-
..}�s:''.. ` 4 i .:,'7::��;"Y»•j�c,.•' rte.S�� trl�••s. � .�►` —G. w '
+ti• r.r r w���Y/
. .....-- e0......w.t v so vw
\e\ �` �... X1 9•may r•�w�r r•w..�!•.w.w•r�r.6 r Y!
..v1 P•ow
v... - .
...` .•Ww- .r i>R�r .
` _ nil o.l
ee� r••�.r•...M w r err
C A r r rr+„��.r w a.. A +r..�•.�..�.r
C--••rA�w.•� >OaC�a7 rw w
•'ti,� st0 \ Z — r r er...,�y o.r.�rl...�..•r..•er tr�..
4
worts
k
Sly -✓ L 3rt~•"• w .c.��°^w�•r.�'•Cw.r►(e•r vr.r A16
� .. (r.►rrq i
30 2 Ar.a.r�e•+Tf r llTf t fL r an_r i
CANWr
W"wIN
�" °�d� 1 jR•U 2 3 9/r } / I I i tear ww..,� a
C Q0
Y.i= W � `�•.�Oi-�Ll .
1s 03 - - 1v 3n @� wr!.
1
a ` / / j �,_ ^' ►^ter r as.r C(C�..r)r wrr..a.r7 n.*.arW ..
at
F: • L X10 �4 F� I I. a' a Ic e.••or.~•�.r w.`r r■.s Tr.�(O.F.ar ts�.�•A+tom
J N'J I •;N e/ I � _ 0. ►.4t.tr h.vbe..r N.vl A w.8_M•L -
• t e•rA s sL---w t•.•.0.1....•a....A.n-
9 ` / .V )75 S /NI: 1 , I M - .:%` -. te,wlF ww.�.ea bo.w..a ww—=!— •a...rr�
! _ _ wa.r..�.7 r Ir......r.r._.
r• • / �� ° , SO I I , ■ "�,.- 3501°`.�I.Is r e..rr.w...7 a.r rr ua!•r w...��r.r C.rm. .
'C_% T. o-.%u n.1 wqw w.E,Cam...
TA.t Dort ee.•e.re L�A�.�rar A Art r 1R
�" :r.:'.,'• \e B/ I 2 I V - ~4 —'�,ae�+.t`sw.�w «rw�..s �sw�~Nr�arc`.
=.'v. \ '(/'(//�1, �`qc I I'q� ,�i. � •�•::ti:5,�,.: Cmlev.sews_ru.r w..rwwr�.rr.r w.rD•,,.r wr.D f.�D!-
r s w...r eryD 3r.Dt} - -
b�r F.MYtIL CL•mw 1A1.•.I.r•
Y+_� 1 1 eery \. Crl'if t.•�_
�• :.�` \ s ?��� `JS.0 �••u _ ••5 -'� o wrw+eaD—M. 3s A.ar r L�.n.36
C�.Lfj�/F� • I �ds r�+ .rdv°—_-u. .e sPe 3.1t we
e TS ( ..Y t. -1......r(a.9..{)r rr..of—sr.r
.ya 6...D-e.r A�u/Aa w T�Ir lrwt;.e. y
.. .. ``\ A
-=ay wra•y wwvwwt.n.r r w fir.•w�r.w
{1T\\ J t -u .•pa.wear.O..r.by W ,t o
CR L ._...
e0.e...w ae.r.••r r 7f• ��i wy�t _ -
� �, / i y °j"•'-_ •a CR Casale•....�. m ttw(r.44 b.nw..t1...•..
°'.�r...ry ra.t•+.rt r�..r r
of
/ \ --+'rl:'.%`._-. z T.blA e-vbw w Ir vw/w/�►�.r.rwrlwy��1 r..
/v O •.- a.wwt to sdrr 8-2 r t.Q wft..l bw 11•.(p•
/ y a..D.Ts r..r C—D.1F(u..•1u►
/ 4 L i t� Ca.o.g7 w.......t..0•..r. t a— aw1....4
0. � L �.'c;<�.., en.bPe....wt w..eob..AA.1t.a.t t►..
"`OSk: \ 'F ,_,�-yR.-.- ev.�....e......A•rti r+.a.►.°..r r.r.r•.v r.r• - .
;��.^x \ ° \ / • - ". .rer AM'd-+/r.rtl.•o.w.0.r w.r1..-...•.
id 0 rb d arl tl...w r D'Rf.r.w e.r�..•..
._i•��� �\ � ;-t3.. >e�•:.'" relolr w ed w...w
\ "r -•-z� .Y .. IW4 Pwe7•101 w.r•r.•y
K•s...l�..•v.......r o..rlr..•1r•7r rra r•r w••rr
l-OP w tA..e..wr.W ftW A wort 0 r w.
tYwl+e.e.t w./w gvnp•a.•o.r✓wr r..wr.w r.r r
4. _.Dn...w+wn7 t...D..A..D..tw r.wr r r... AB
M, WNW MAP ) •.• I " ;, 1..ow. war.......nrw....a..w•+r.....4b..~r r
'- ': - 'n..er�a.�1N lM•rO w am-3r..O.• :m w tint is
\ M75F1/a�5 A.G m� 1 ° ✓. i. 1rwDr•7IJT. I.w�...r r/r war•s•r�r•r b W
_ 6t1(T M FAYW ri ,:., =:=i tm.a..ery.� tut?wc.rL w a -..r wal.
OF LOT 1.ax L V m :;>t-;7 t—C4 r SL A.walr M"" D..s b w►—PA%rn..a Cr.r
s16e.O.Ce b w anti1.1.•niw({imp
-e, ST.A11TNCW ` /I -`A er ., S 11r Pq�y w•.r tlw.tw.../..°..r Dr 0'CRY r 3L AMr¢ -
� a -Tw.a.•.r•�...r w•_•w..rw tr rr...3...r•v rr
rA10.A1( : D•wr.....t rr ALWAcm.um To-I - w7 r.•rd.r
\! [) _•?�. _ - •o....y ALTA e..A�w 1•2...Dvrwt m D..
S .3 (s•....y ALTA•w Ad w.w rr•t•.Ir ew.r Nr.
B/ ► CS '.'• {.' o..tlM,tr,r e.1 SVw>v a e..r....r�rr wdw w..7.; "`
_- WTN ME NE �j'(Fi/y a�,o- - 3,a 7a TD,.r 11 w.r..r Tr.A
.. ym
40 POEM ME � _ � ` - -i9V�..Y
• :_ Pei✓ �44w 1• m CAs ;•. _�, Wlb...A..Ib.m
�
.'c: ... SITE OWOWA&3� M EA OF PAN=A.ZL W�n do•w / , g' An•ioL t•1 3570! r -
_- Oa Tm MTO uxT ARA OF PAR=3.17.W6 on 4,7D r_ \ ::•�y.:.T•.�:�•.£: - - (M�aS7-63D0 �
,S .:
STCm imm OAIE RE1AStON !some 1F ::.- 238701.Dw0
CMC ALTA ACSM SURVEY .0
;z .-20• Anderson FOR 1
_.. _. . ■�■ Assoc.,Inc. CUSTOM UQUIDATORS INC. of
. � __-' '�° g, eoaa-- - w._�3r.-rr• ��+�_ ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 1
.. . _ tra Z>zw ~F!e 1r7+n�-s.D+ �� 9/06/93 t= RF w
2387.01 SHEET6
20
w 40(IIQ) (112) (113) at j L° Co�° 2
(74) (123) U08►
u09) (114) - i0 a� (130)
(70) (71)LU (73)
'.7) (681 (69 � 6o u9')t ��, ����,,0 �►Q ptia .?o °o �-
E S t
60 60 E'1 60 - -60__ 60 60 60 lo: :.,p.9 p 5\•4C\.nCj 2��2\ c�j 2B y\ lj,� - ',r_ _� --
60 6L\ ' _ -- °cl''t.:.. p;9 G��
60 E0 60 6 Ate_ z 1° :1.48 pC p0
5 60 -AV
-- - — - 6 b0
- 6
I. 0 D � v
0 60 . 9 �i I o / f,
6 6 60 . (30)
0
p 0 0 0 Z 2 \06S r� p -so-
.0 4
10 °' c 0 g °
m °
15 + r °-
6 Q 5 m (8)
0 •_o (9)
12 (11 m m 11 )
13) (12) m
LIM m
10 16 m 3 (15) (IQ ul (17)v (19) O 21 20 (20) °'
22 c22) (21)
a P
.
ct7)
25) (24) (2 o°
v
Q
Q � � J
rrII f u D 60 60
e 60 - �_ SO E7
60 60 N mt�i OV 39�9�e
6p 60 60
. 60 60 ,
60 60 60 60 60 60
941. 4 I
�''9 (2) ti/
`° rpEN
' h� SS�S• °° `Opp 60
• , �O
(60-351)
(357) �O
U J 2
ul
sy I b
Z
0
Al w
(ELM)
(HEMLOCK)
I
60.
A PT OF /
' ° titi ��0 p
6�'' �J J
(IRONWOOD) - •y' p N /
Q
Sh S �0 '�' Q o ;
10 N84•24- 9' �5 (53)
59' o • G9 �`��� 3003 %
m p° ? �o E e+ m
o, ,! C.°,r Sy.� p D O PORT Of LOT 10 /^
p J• ' C
• .y°�'� °n es 123.55 i•
_ (LOCUST) 6 PART OF LOT I
'Y61.
r SA 0 9,/d /
(355)
(22)
� �'S1•i'\,ti0 � • ^ /� nM( � ZJ�• 123.5
II ll O UJi 9��PT Of LT 2
. .., a' �`^' �Q __AAdd � Sh.a�,,•��c,
(112) (113) 5 3p' . p 2 h /
w 40
u23) U081 (109) L60 1 (114) a2 LO y �� a`��(130)
(7 41 (115) \0°' `O 'q,S, 112
(67) (691
(7u (72) (73) ..
(691 ;
(70) I
60 60 °0
6V 60 6•) 60 --60-_ 60 60 N Io;.:.i0.9 p.5\.nAT 2��\1` �/ 2 y\�j _ •�_ -i -- -
IIA
60 60 '51
60 60
EO 60 60 - _^ VIE— 1�* .:1.48�a�
— - A E5
6 0 8 .1c EAST 1 a L..::.:
-- ---- - 0 11
1 /
- 6 6 60 0 0 60w t�O® (30) oo �
0 0 t� 2 �0��0 VO `SO .
no 32 S
Q m 6 5 v
N Io ° ql/) ° a r (10) m (91 m c81 - o �� •^�A'
u+ i4 13 12 m II m (13) m m (12) - c �®
m 1r iD 16 i5 m m (16) (15) - (14) - - z
° 21 20 19 1s m (20) (191 (17) - O
S1 m (24). m (23) - (22) - (2u - O n L/) �� �y (17) o
n p � Ll - 60 60 60 Q Qz,
\ M C � �4 pD
�l U 60 60 60 -60--- 50 6,) N � men 39i O
8
60 v
60 60
60 60
60
50
(21
O�' �\J�,• 6'�9. hti C�O � O�J
C1� (60-351)
4
(357)
J� 1 6 Lv o 2
� �QO
9� W � � (191 N Z u91
I
O
° O
N a
(ELM)
y
I ti Q i
(HEMLOCK) _ -
o I �Q (20) - V) '
�I n 60 CO ' T
J PT OFN
LT I
J
(IRONWOOD) — 5yo� h titia -a o�
I (m O,� 10 N84.24'S9'E 9� �O (53) �^ ► '909 s r,
1 `�� OQ .1`' .� S4: 300
o L \ ? i' PART OF LOT 10 °° ` C 3 i
ul
tip" e` 123.55 :� FOR -
_ (LOCUST) _ I S9 ` PART OF LOT I '
t 4
(355) ? s•a ;
..•.488 � :ti � � I
0�i'�t i • (22)
o, • S PT OF LT 2
�.f
�:i _ - -
.
G✓ Y
- . -
b
_ _M.m 4 `�
_ _
s
_ _ _ _
'I 5.
`..
... _ - _
.I. �..v.
r.
•
t re. ai — - S , w P�., m , � mm, -.:�
-m-- :. — !,�. -,; .-,. .-.,�Ia m-.'-..�,'--M-�,M.-,,- .-,M"m : � , -- m- - -� -,, �--- --.- -,-:- '! g• _ ..
1.,, — _ -- — . .;� -. ,h,- i, .�-- .. I'M I .-�. �"��,--C �----�mm- M: --m m. -, -M---,-�-- , I .Im..-;.,---..-
�-.� -,.m,. m ;_-..--M-m m - m m---- ,--".m I I . , . m y- I :- :�- I- - - , m - .,- "z'
I m-`tv'.�'- .-: �--m-,, - -, "M-- , ,---,1. ..,m: - --.. - M.m,M;I m.,�p,,-.-.., .;; - - - - - ;�M-, - - 7m-,�- -_,.,..--.�'..,---M" _ --.>i -
-
_. .-m, - --I-I--
. -- - -��', .--.-:�,M-M,--Mm,�--z:-.',m - ,, : .-�- .M7... -111, .�.;,, ��M-� - -'. mm, .,.,
m, ,w..�.I.-m-- :.-.- �.: I - ��� -� -..m-�m- I-m --m-... -, .. E-JI -� ,.i- .. ...r;f�'--��-.."-,,'�-.,"��, -�: � m�-�:-.�,
�--�-;.-.---..'� � m , •
fi .-
.m .m M...- - , .. - - -_M.
L
_ -
r
u
. - _ _
.
r
.{f
}
?` M.. _
L_
- +' i— �x - - _ F= _
b wP _ `
7--Y � _ - ,-
I - �' -
..'.
... - - � -:C C -
w
�.r _
fit .. F. _ s t%t - - 1 y:-; 'I. S. �, _ - "
1 _I I ,.r ...- tea — -1-
... .. _ _ _
.
- - ..
E,,,. - I I. _ \ -
.yJ
.. _ ! _ t - _ - ..
d - 7 - .+ _ _ - _ _
.
.' - - - '1.. - - -
r Y ` y 1.
.
:.
a
t4
_ - _ _
.. _
_ �
.. .: : _ _%.. Z
. - .. S I .-
-.
..<
._ — -
r
.. ., - -
- .
• I J t
1 E'.
�� - ..,. ,. ", - M'-.-,, , � -,�.- .
�' - ' _ -
m
•
. - .. _ - _ _ . - Lri6A '? S- �^"K�._�..,"1�� •7� � ��di rt*"re.� 2�.,v.f.� 1..
F
_ � �. r ! ate. :c.� < :A�'I -., .v r.=rte._ •aw•a:,t-c.-.. �-•�'^�t
.ti+-zr _ _ �,-� 2, rcvr'i
�.� _ r s+iS..:. ,y: .'� .'W—
Le ° ash Sew
�`> - - _ - �r ii -._ .v,'•-� f'�y�- `r-`-" -r'O .. g;' n:,..:•n-•t.�rr ".y _
'�''i`;�.. w.A'[t.Y,? _1r• r._t _ - + _ � `�� yl,E� .-',di:r_-xk.:.• _
_�a-. �:mot.,{y.:.::f.. .s� t•.S - �h cr"s�yii.�+.<. y_.:�.•c.-'....r:Sc
-psi`.
- - - r�--: �"i. �}}`•...:f:�t��o r� 3 ,,�, 4ry• _o.. r�- -t-��`Tr•' y. .4 Ty".�. �� `�+w•• t.s^.-.- i.
•:i >. f' i. ! a.✓ t!k .�.i '.vn,"rl.+ :653.,i`�.f }��st_l.'y'• ,C: y�y ._•b S Y
. .. ,. .}, �-.Y...,sw 7,�+�..`a`•�'*'se j;,.�'°` � � !- tiffs"*,-_1_rk,1A"F•t 7+T -`�"r.. .L.� n. �-��n" �7=#� -� _ �'�".,�r>.ac�r�yK
-.f _ ,�� .:� -
,. .. Y: �f;it�-•'�I° 1. - _T.N-'+,L i1['n --':4.r.4�' 'G'1EF,^: _.''� - �. ��,Y•'��yj,^ ..+RF- l.yM ",�.
- .. _. -�' 'k6 �� '��� � �R '�•`,.TM„�^'`. 4�,t
'r $s' C4 �i
r,at�t�rd�s.�t'--'YET •�--t!'��,: 4?_ ?y� � ``�`ar��, aF.
- 1'. �F A. � :�,�,.•.xti� 'c'"L4� .rile - �. �.r�+._�°a'�.s � -� -
•
- A
r ,
T
"�i; --�� , j � fie. _• - .. _ - _ .-
i -,
d
�zrk1r'
DEVELOPMENT
G35 A9 9F.(14.5!ACRES ::a�-1Z�F.'Fa'�'y F 1 .
DEVFIDRt'_MT 917E AREA ( ) 5;r k'S"'�:' ' R
NL A/_e GREEN AREA G4,Im sF. I.Si A(AES) Kk•�,�1'�.,-T^.y�� ,,,� O
N0Rn1 RETA0.STORE a-T,r�}'r a ''i ,.
SITE AREA 77,573 SdAfE
07 S ACRES)
v rTj�S}c C
PARKNG EPACES C
NORTH QETA4.BPLDING 50,4W S.F. tl
EX19TdG
=AREA 15,9ia0 S.i,
E%PAN91ON Bur.PNG AREA 4 Rao 9.F. ,F� � M°
pRlvE-TWRO PHARTUCT ADDED pp..
SG/rH RETAIL BUILDING
50,4SO SF. ITv�L Ca K rJ _ iR
EX19T0Y.BU400L AREA 34,38 4.F.
-AN91Di pU1LP,A:AREA Id 0a0T0 9 F.
QE9TwRANT 1300 SEATS) ya,+)�. s•
edo M DAIRT gIEEH
f71P416101 LWILpN-i AREA I4O0 S.F. -
marM/SCLI N RETAIL PARKING 40 9PKF5 gr a. I '.
(4.3 SPACEW=9f.OF RETAIL AREA) t�"' p
WEST RErAR mm.DMG 16,700 5 F. -
DATCARE SPACE 10.000 S.F i
5T.ANTHONY FIRE STAnd 5(SPACES -
PARKWG SPACES
(4.6 SPACES/10W
31 SSf.; IL.RETA AREA)
HRGIK POST 9UILPNi 6d SPACES ' �� ?ti I -
PARRRIG SPACF9 �s V
(73 Sl1000 SPACE S F OF R 4
ETAM1 AI�FA��'•
L.3M •� _ !F I I I I
ne yt�pM F I ;
;,���uy�,���. ��iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILII_I_LL� `y
��3+�.'v�X•�� 1R AA» J ILL III'
�" �-� °.°mr •}G°I>I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I��
- AnaAwa� F r
SAINT
ANTHONY
I ,
9.j VrL o SHOPPING
` + CENTER
SAINT ANTHONY,MINNESOTA
PREPARED TOR
REPUBLIC lNVEgn+tXTCOMPANY
�• ` nd'
`9 Tush;e
Monlgomcry
AS00CIOteB
K. Inc.
..+^ +3Y,Zf.l�f
I
PROPOS M ST RP AN - OPTI
' KkA r-aor A4.Iw 0eA�•.saa w...
3300 Edeea.0'eM• *6M
A6e4maN.AfA..em 95439
• •
25
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 6/13/00 MEETING DATE: 6/20/00
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom
RE: Concept .Review. Frontline Church and Outreach Center. Petition for
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance and Concurrent Conditional Use Permit.
James Abbott, Associate Pastor has submitted the attached June 12 communication for locating the Frontline
Church and Outreach Center in the commercial property at 2654 Kenzie Terrace. Requires a petition for
amendment to zoning ordinance(adding a church as a conditional use in a C district) and permit for conditional
use. 'The Church does not own the property. Therefore they can not serve, without written permission from
the owner, as the applicant.
Staff Recommendation: Since this is a Concept Review, staff has no recommendation at this time.
Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin
•
•
26
Frontline Church
-and Outreach Center
June 12,2000
Spencer Isom
Assistant City Manager
3301 Silver Lake Road
St.?.nthony,MN 55418-1699 -
Dear Spencer, -
We are submitting this letter in preparation for concept review and subsequent public hearing. Frontline
Church and Outreach Center has recently signed a purchase agreement for the property located at 2654
Kenzie Terrace in St.Anthony Village. We are aware that it is zoned commercial and would require a -
• petition for amendment to zoning ordinance and permit for conditional use in a commercial district to allow
the building to be used as a church. If the City Council would be so gracious as to accept us into the.'
community of Saint Anthony Village we would like to use this facility for the purpose of church assembly
on the main floor and we would lease the basement to a storage company.
We established this church in March of 1994 and we have been leasing from Krause Anderson at the
Han-dine Shopping Center in Roseville for over five years. It has always been our desire to keep our church
in the city since so many churches have moved out of the cities for necessity of growth. This facility would
work well for us and we feel we could be a very positive addition to your fine community.
Our plans for this facility would be to make a complete renovation on the inside and exterior before
occupancy would take place. We will submit plans for new sidewalks,handicap ramp at entrance,
resurface parking lot,signage(within city codes)and beautiful landscaping which will be complimentary to
the city's plan for the area. We have had to do quite an extensive renovation at the Hamline Center space
in order to make the space acceptable for assembly and through it all we have had a very good working
relationship with the city of Roseville.
I hope that you will give our application your most serious consideration as I think churches are a very
important part of a strong and healthy community.. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, -
James Abbott,Associate Pator_ :=
• Frontline Church&Outreach Center
i Frontline Church&Outreach Center
2819 Hamline Avenue.Roseville MN 55113
- 651.636.2594
Frontline Midway Church&Outreach Center
1571 University Avenue.5t Paul MN 55104
27
• St. Anthony Planning Committee
We would like to thank the members of the planning committee for considering our
possible membership to the community of St. Anthony. It is our,hope that you will
grant us the zoning variance we require to bring our church family into this
neighborhood.
Front line Church & Outreach Center;
❖ FCOC established in Mauch of 1994.
❖ Our vision is to stay close to the heart of the city and to be a
light to those in need of help and hope.
❖ We are very outreach oriented; we are heavily involved in
mission work and have been involved in several community
outreaches.
❖ We have a full compliment of ministries including nursery,
toddlers, children, pre-teen, and youth.
❖ Our membership is at 150 including children.
2654 Kenzie Terrace
❖ As you can see by our architectural rendering that this
property has wonderful potential to suit our purposes as well
as complimenting the aesthetics of the area.
❖ We intend to invest $75,000.00 on exterior improvements and
$185,000.00 on the interior.
❖ The exterior accoutrements will include extensive
landscaping, brick - base signage with flood lighting, handicap
ramp & parking, newly surfaced parking lot, new window
treatments and a beautiful walkway awning.
•
a�g rl ► J�
�i05�d1 i
•
�,aZ�� Tt`�1S '�I�S.•13
1�1Wlpn
rniry
y'vli -uv aarvn a fiZmI
YOO
•
fir► � � ` �
• 6% 69I v
It A
1 t v r 79
I1• . 410,
•
�
• �t
„
Nh �I
i
p � e
o •
�! *a,�q:;'----- - `P+ ;' •• B I•PA2KI Ll Co S PA CA-=S TcFrAL
o� ► e / 3•NAurmcOPPEO seb -Es
� .
1n T i , r
db
N •1'
�. V� •1 4b
5 3
=1 rr
�l
l
'. t: a.. 6•F.
slam
At
1IIIJ • �'
31
MEMORANDUM
• DATE: 7/12/00 MEETING DATE: 7/18/00
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Assistant City Manager Isom,
RE: Public Hearing. Application for Conditional Use Permit for a Fuel Mart Car
Wash on the Commercial Property at 3813 Stinson Blvd. NE.
The applicants, Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad, seek to build a Fuel Mart Car Wash on their property at 3813
Stinson Blvd. NE zoned C. According to City Code their project requires a permit for conditional use. A
concept review was held before the Commission on 6/20/00. The applicants have taken the Commission's
comments into consideration and resubmitted a complete application to staff.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Commission review the minutes from 6/20/00 and the
application found in the Commission's packet and either approve or deny said application.
Please note, when making a decision, that a conditional use, for practical purposes, is the same as a permitted
use. However, the City can require the applicant to construct according to reasonable conditions placed upon
said applicant by the City Council.
Cc: City Clerk Kroeplin
•
32
late: 2C60 Fee: $130.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Applicant: �� ' 1`"0 Phone: W� �� `
�p
Address:
Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.):
Street address and/or legal description of property in question:
M500 13LV D>1 A
Zoning district in which property is located: [ f ��
al proposed:
Conditional use
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied
before a conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using
additional sheets, if necessary.
1) The p roposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the
zoning district in which it is to be located.
Lim
2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general
welfare of Rersons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values,or
improvements in the vicinity.
K
3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to
provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will
contribute to the general welfare �t��eig boyhood or munity._ � �y e�Lit)s`y-
Yes `moo ' �'� lU I
Signature of applicant: - - - -
i ;�
33
APPLICANTS, PLEASE NOTE:
All developers or property owners must submit the following information to the City of
St. Anthony Village by the Tuesday that is 30 days.prior to the meeting of.the Planning
Commission or City Council meeting at which the request will be heard at a public
hearing.
1. Complete application for specific request and pay fee.
2. Complete survey and site plans (including measurements), showing building,
driveways, curb cuts, ingress, egress, etc. on the property and in relation to adjacent
sites.
I Explanation of materials used, and plans for screening, landscaping, fencing and
dumpster enclosures.
4. Drawings of completed buildings, if appropriate to the project, and materials used.
5. Storm water retention and drainage plans. The appropriate water shed district or
water management organization are required to be notified of the project.
6. A letter explaining the reason for the variance or conditional use. In the letter,
please describe that the undue hardship is and have all the questions from the
previous side answered completely. An incomplete application will not be
scheduled before the Planning Commission or City Council.
A
34
N° 34655
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418
RECEIVED OF 4
'r o CASH
/ `�. •,� % P CHECK
1
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
3301 S'lvor Lake Rd. Phone(612)-7894881
By
THANK YOUI
IT7 TH18 CHECK IS DEUVEREO FOF PAYMENT
ON THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS. 1�
DATE AMOUNT 7133
IE
FUEL MART, INC.
3813 STINSON BLVD., NE PH. 612-788-2609
ST. ANTHONY, MN 55421
56-15222501
_ �1 S cy 910
DATE �C i IF
TOTAL OF INVOICES PAY
LESS-%DISCOUNT THE <
OPRER OF- $ 1.3o
LESS FREIGHT
LESS C N �• A� t
DOLLARS �.,a� I.
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ,
AMOUNT OF CHECK
*RRSARSa�k,N.A.NA. !FFE
Balk Without Bolmdades h
L MP
11300 ? 133um -1:09 10 IS 2 241: B46301 19
•
CIVEL ENGLNEERING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 35
URBAN PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
PROJECT NARRATIVE:
June 30, 2000
On behave of Hadi & Roger Abou-Mourad,the owners,they respectfully request that the City of
St. Anthony grants a Conditional Use Permit to construct an automated tunnel car wash on the
property site at 3801 Stinson Boulevard Northeast, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55421.
PROPERTY ZONING: The property is currently zoned Commercial and all surrounding
adjacent property is also zoned Commercial. Automotive uses are permitted as a Conditional Use
under this zoning classification.
SITE AREA AND EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is 28,143.64 square feet or .646 acres
in area. The site currently has a freestanding fast food restaurant building located on it, which
would be demolished, and all other site improvements removed if approval is received from the
City.
LANDSCAPING: The existing over-story boulevard trees surrounding the site are proposed to
remain. Additional landscaping is proposed as screening and enhancements in the islands at each
end of the car wash building, along the north foundation of the car wash building, along Stinson
• boulevard, and several over-story trees at the north west edge of the site.
FUTURE EXPANSION: The owners will request approval from the City next year to construct
a 30 foot wide by 109 foot long, 6 bay service facility attached to the south of the car wash
structure.
PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT: The Owners propose to construct a 108' — 8" long by
30 foot 8 inch wide car wash structure totaling 3,343 square feet. The proposed height of the .-
structure v6ll be 14 feet 8 inches. It is proposed that a 55 gal. Trash cart will be stored inside the
electrical service room and only placed outside for weekly pick-ups.
OPERATION: The operation of the convenience car wash will be in conjunction with the
owner's existing Conoco service station & convenience store business located on the adjacent
property immediately to the north of this site. It is proposed to construct an internal connection
between the two sites to facilitate vehicular circulation from the gas station to the car wash
facility. It is proposed that the car wash will have the same hours of operation as the Conoco fuel
mart. The facility will be fully automated with out the need for on-site employees.
HI+S ASSOCIATES INC
• 831 RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 100
ST.PAUL,M11N 55114
PHONE 651/659-973'- FA-\651/659-0891
E-Mail:info®hksassocia[es-com
•
ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES: The building is proposed to be constructed with brick and
`rock face' unit masonry facade, a 4 foot high pre-finished metal facia and cap flashing. Colors
of the metal facia and cap flashing will be copper.The owners plan to upgrade the facade of their
existing building; in conjunction with several other improvements to their existing building, with
a new pre-finished metal canopy of the same color. The `rock face' unit masonry will be tan in
color at the base 4 courses and alternate with a dark brown brick coursing. Refer to Architectural
drawing A-2 for detail of the proposed coursing.
SIGNAGE: The Owners propose to install signage at the north and south facades of the building
with the text to read"CAR WASH". Refer to Architectural sheet A-2 for specific locations.
There will be two monument directional signs located on the site for traffic flow and signage on
each end of the building designating entrance and exit for customer information.
PARKING: It is proposed to pave the lot excluding the future expansion area. 9 parking stalls
are proposed to service the car wash facility including one Handicap stall.
•
•