HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 02122002 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
102957
Box: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 02122002
I
H.R.A. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
l REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. J
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community,
a walkable village,which is sae and secure
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
February 12, 2002
7:00 PM, Council Chambers
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the Following Items:
I. Approval of February 12, 2002 City Council Meeting Agenda. Action
requested.
11. Proclamations and Recognitions.
III. Community Forum..
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the
regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name
and address for.the Clerk's record and limit their remarks to five minutes.
Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this
time, but may typically refer the matter,to staff for a future report or direct that the
matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IV. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen
so requests, in which event the item'will be removed from the Consent Agenda
and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
1. Consider January 22, 2002 Council meeting minutes. (pp. 1 - 7)
2. Consider licenses and permits. (p. 8)
3. Consider payment of claims. (pp. 9 - 10)
V. Public Hearings.
1. Consideration of the following resolutions relating to the 2002 Street and
Utility Improvements Project: Action is requested on all three resolutions.
(pp. 1143)
Page 2
A. Resolution 02-023 - Adopting and confirming assessments (pp. 14
- 15))
B. Resolution 02-024 - Awarding construction bid (pp. 16 - 18))
C. Resolution 02-025- Calling for sale of improvement bonds (p. 19)
VI. Reports From Commissions and Staff.
1. Report on Northwest Quadrant redevelopment project (Jim Prosser,
Ehlers & Associates, will be present).
2. Presentation of Annual Liquor Report for 2001 (Mike Larson, Liquor
Manager will be present). (pp. 20 - 21)
VII. General Policy Business of the Council.
1. Resolution 02-026 - Approving Amendment to Standing Rules for Conduct
of City Council Meetings. Action requested. (pp. 22 - 28)
Vlll. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers. (pp. 29 - 32)
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Miscellaneous Informational Documents.
XI. Adjournment..
1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 January 22, 2002
6
7
8 CALL TO ORDER
9 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:0.0 p.m.
10
11 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
12 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
13
14 ROLL CALL.
15 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust.
16 Absent: None.
17 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson; City Attorney Jerry Gilligan.
18
19 CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
20 ITEMS.
21
22 I. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 22,2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
23 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to approve the City Council Meeting Agenda of January 22,
24 2002.
25
26 Motion carried unanimously.
27
28 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
29 None.
30
31 III. COMMUNITY FORUM.
32 Mayor Hodson invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items
33 not on the regular meeting agenda.
34
35 Resident Jennifer Tanner, 2614 37`h Avenue NE, came forward to address the Council regarding
36 the conditional use permit that Essenco was granted. Tanner stated that she and her husband
37 went to see where Essenco was formerly located in St. Paul. She indicated that they spoke to a
38 couple of different people who work in the same facility in St. Paul,both of whom stated that
39 they could smell the odor. Tanner indicated that the smell was also detected outside of the
40 building.
41
42 Tanner stated that they plan to contact United Properties and investigate what type of tenant
43 Essenco was and suggested that the City do the same.
44
45 Councilmember Sparks asked how Tanner felt about the decision that the Council arrived at
46 during the last Council meeting. Tanner stated it was very important for them to get the issue
47 resolved properly, and stated that already they have called the City to file complaints and will
48 continue to do so, as necessary.
49
2
1 Doug Tanner, 2801 37`h Avenue, suggested that the Council make copies of previous meetings
2 (Planning Commission meetings of 11-20-01, and 12-18-01 and City Council meetings of 11-27-
3 01, and 1-8-02, and 1-22-02) and keep them in a safe place for future reference. He also -
4 requested that the Council temporarily rescind their decision to allow Essenco to operate until
5 September 1,2002.
6
7 Tanner indicated that at a previous meeting, Solie stated that he would do whatever it takes in
8' order to eliminate the odor.
9
10 Tanner continued to cite information from several past meetings that suggested that the
11 manufacturing process does not emit any odor that would be offensive to a person. The
12 information that Tanner reviewed also expressed the sincere desire on behalf of Levitus and
13 Solie to fix any problems associated with the candle manufacturing.
14
15 Tanner concluded citing examples of statements made by Solie and Levitus that indicate they
16 have spoken falsely in previous meetings.
17
18 Tanner stated that he feels that laws have been broken; facts have been tested, and failed. He
19 continued that the City Council has bent over backwards to accommodate Essenco,which he
20 does not feel that Essenco deserved. Tanner recommended that all City Councilmembers review
21 the four videos that he referred to earlier in chronological order.
22
23 Mayor Hodson stated that they certainly would review the mentioned video tapes.
24
25 IV.CONSENT AGENDA.
26
27 1. Consider January 8. 2002 Council meeting minutes.
28 2. Consider licenses and permits.
29 3 Consider Rayment of claims.
30 4. Resolution 02-018, re:.Consider Fire Department mutual aid.
31 5. Resolution 02-019, re: Consider Assessment Agreement with Hennepin County.
32 6. Resolution 02-020,re: Order feasibility report for flood abatement improvements for
33 Silver Lane.
34
35 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen to approve the Consent Agenda.
36
37 Motion carried unanimously.
38
39 PUBLIC HEARINGS.
40 None.
41
42 VI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
43 None.
44
45 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
46 1. Resolution 02-021, re: Consider Lease Agreement for charitable gambling at the Stonehouse.
47 Mornson advised the Council that the rent could increase to as high as $1,000 per month, while it
48 is currently$900. Morrison also stated that the expiration date of the Premises Permit Renewal
49 is March 31,2002.
50
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 3
January 22, 2002
Page 3
1 Councilmember Sparks asked how they would fulfill the terms of the contract if the
2 Stonehouse closed. Mornson cited a clause in the lease agreement which protected the city
3 from any lease obligation if they Stonehouse were to close. The lease can be terminated
4 earlier by mutual consent of both parties.
5 Councilmember Horst suggested that they increase the rent to $1,000, as they could use the
6 money. Faust suggested that they do not know the status of the Stonehouse at this time,thus,
7 suggested that they keep the rent at$900.
8 Councilmember Faust indicated that he was comfortable with the $900 per month rent.
9 Mayor Hodson stated that he did not find the dollar amount significant, either.
10
11 Motion by Councilmember Faust to approve Resolution 02-021,re: Consider Lease
12 Agreement for charitable gambling at the Stonehouse.
13 Motion carried unanimously.
14
15 2. Resolution 02-022,.re: Consider Application for Premises Permit Renewal for charitable
16 gambling at the Stonehouse.
17 Motion by Councilmember Faust to approve Resolution 02-022, re: Consider Application for
18 Premises Renewal for charitable gambling at the Stonehouse.
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20 3. Ordinance 2002-001, re: Requiring licenses for physical culture and health servicew(miz).
21 Mayor Hodson suggested tabling this item until the City Council annual goal-setting
22 meeting, at which time they will have the opportunity to look at the issue of licenses for
23 physical culture and health services in depth.
24 4. Presentation of residential survey.
25 Mornson stated that Bill Morris was present from Decision Resources, LTD,to review the
26 results of the Executive Summary of the Village of St. Anthony. Mornson indicated that the
27 last survey was conducted in 1998.
28 Morris indicated that they spoke with four hundred randomly selected households by
29 telephone during November 26, 2001 through December 12, 2001.
30 Morris stated that the quality of life rating was very high in this community,with a 38%
31 "excellent"rating, and a 58%"good"rating.
32 Morris indicated that there were two dominant themes that came forward with what residents
33 like most about their community: viewed as being a small town, and location.
34 Morris stated that the most serious issue in the Village of St. Anthony was the Apache Mall
35 site.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 4
January 22, 2002
Page 4
1 Councilmember Sparks asked if the percentage of unsure responses(20%)to the most
2 serious issues in the community was high.
3 Reviewing sense of community,Morris revealed that 63%of residents rated the community
4 as good, 26%as excellent; and I% felt the sense of community is poor.
5 Morris stated that at 80%of residents felt at least reasonably safe when walking alone in
6 their neighborhood after dark. He indicated that number in 20%above the norm.
7 Morris stated that a look at past changes in neighborhoods during the past couple of years
8 with respect to crime-rate, revealed that residents felt it was about the same as the past few
9 years.
10 Morris indicated that residents gave City Services quite high ratings, which he stated was
11 exceptionally solid in comparison to other communities.
12 Morris indicated that,by a ratio of 3-1, residents indicated that they would be in favor of a
13 tax increase in order to maintain city services at current levels. Councilmember Horst asked
14 if,when residents responded to tax questions,had they seen the 2002 property tax estimates.
15 Morris restated the time during which they conducted the survey.
16 _ Morris indicated that a reduction in City Services in order to get a property tax cut had a 70%
17 opposition. He stated that the general perception of property taxes was that 41% felt they
18 were about average,while 33% felt they were somewhat high.
19 Morris indicated that the value of Village services was high quite high in comparison to the
20 norm.
21 Morris indicated that 40% of residents indicated that they felt they knew a great deal about
22 the work of the Mayor and City Council, or at least a fair amount. Morris indicated that
23 there was an unusually high(47%) rating of job performance by the Mayor and City Council.
24 Councilmember Sparks asked if the high rating of uncertainty in job performance rating
25 suggested that there was a lack of communication on behalf of the City Council,or general
26 disinterest. Morris stated that residents felt that.communications within the City are
27 generally adequate.
28 Morris indicated that the Community Center has good usership based on the programs that
29 are offered.
30 Morris indicated that youth programs were somewhat above the norm with a 42% sufficient
31 rating.
32 Morris stated that a tax increase for the purpose of capital improvements received some
33 . support. He stated that residents would need to be convinced about the need of a
34 replacement Fire Station, and replacement of the Public Works building.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes �J
January 22, 2002
Page 5
1 Morris reviewed the principal information source for the City of St. Anthony which revealed
2 that the St. Anthony Bulletin was the primary source with a rating of 36%,and the grapevine
3 was next with a 17%rating. The least used information source was the Star Tribune(3%),
4 and Village Notes (5%).
5 In general,Morris indicated that the survey on the whole is a very good report,with the
6 quality of life in the City of St. Anthony graded very high by residents. He stated that taxes
7 and City Services were given a very high rating compared to other cities in the metro area,
8 and concluded that, if there are concerns, there are two: flooding, and the Apache Mall.
9 Morris stated that support, at best, is marginal for the Fire Station and the.Public Works
10 building. He added that any referendum would require a very strong campaign.
11 Morris added that the ratings of liquor stores were exemplary.
12 Morris indicated that the City is doing well maintaining a small-town ambiance, which keeps
13 the area desirable to non-residents, as well current ones.
14 Councilmember Thuesen asked if he got a sense that a couple of issues got blurred together
15 regarding the flooding. Moms stated that flooding, and not sanitary sewer,was the concern.
16 Councilmember Faust asked.for a brief summary comparing demographics with other
17 communities. Morris stated that they validated the community demographics in the survey
18 with the US Census Bureau statistics that had been released from the 2000 survey.
19 Morris indicated that the City of St. Anthony has more senior households than other
20 communities. Morris indicated that households with school-age children was a bit higher
21 than the norm.
22 Councilmember Faust asked about the average level of income in comparison to other
23 communities. Morris indicated that the income level for the City of St. Anthony of$49,000
24 was right at the norm.
25 Councilmember Sparks asked about the high level of satisfaction, and if it were directly
26 related to demographics. Morris stated that,with respect to City services and taxes,-seniors
27 are not more satisfied residents.
28 Councilmember Sparks thanked Morris for his time and extensive information.
29 Mayor Hodson stated that he was very pleased with their results.
30 Mayor Hodson asked Police Chief Engstrom to come forward and address the Council on
31 the Police Department's Massage Ordinance Rationale.
32 Engstrom indicated that the rationale on behalf of the Police Department to get an ordinance
33 in place was for the purpose of having the ability to take a license away, or provide a court
34 order to massage parlors which are conducting prostitution.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 22, 2002
Page 6
1 Engstrom reviewed a partial list of reasons to support a massage ordinance:
2 • Businesses associated with this type of activity are unusually prone to abuse, and
3 demand more than average service from the Police Department.
4 • Once begun, an ill-reputable business is hard to dislodge from the community.
5 • Ordinance gives both criminal and civil strength to City for combating illegal
6 operations.
7 • Capital requirements insures only reputable businesses
8 • Educational requirements insure business will engage in legal massage.
9 Engstrom stated that he felt that the new ordinance looked much improved,but asked that the
10 Council reconsider a capital investment, as it insures only reputable businesses.
11
12 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
13 Momson stated that they may need to use Village Notes for some more positive communication
14 than what they currently are.
15 Momson stated that he and Mayor Hodson confirmed the agenda for the.joint City
16 Council/School Board meeting with the School Board which is scheduled for January 29, 2002.
17 Mornson indicated that he has required that all department heads give an annual report to the
18. City Council. Councilmember Sparks stated that she would be in favor of receiving one report
19 per meeting.
20 Momson indicated that the legislative conference was on February 28, 2002.
21 Momson indicated that he, Mayor Hodson, and Todd Hubmer(WSB),would need to continually
22 monitor the funding that they have received for the flood mitigation project. He added that the
23 bonding bill will likely be increased, and that they will meet with legislators, in order to get
24 future funding.
25 Councilmember Faust indicated that he attended the Metropolitan Radio Board Meeting where
26 they discussed the 800 mega-hertz system. He stated that the system is a common frequency
27 about all the details of all public service being able to operate throughout systems. He stated that
28 they are getting to the point where they can use a hand-held device to communicate from one
29 Fire Department to another across the State.
30 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he felt it was good timing for the joint meeting with the
31 School Board.
32 Councilmember Sparks indicated that she met with the Mississippi Watershed Management
33 Organization recently. She stated that the Council will be reviewing the new joint and
34 cooperative agreement in the next couple of months.
35 Councilmember Horst indicated that the Community Services Board meeting was on January 10,
36 2002. He stated that the main topic at that meeting was about necessary position cutbacks. He
37 stated that any and all feedback was welcome that may help them determine how to go about
38 cutting positions.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 22, 2002
Page 7
1 Councilmember Thuesen talked about the possibility of ECFE being eliminated during the next
2 legislative session. Councilmember Sparks referred to what a major issue losing ECFE
3 programs would be.
4 Mayor Hodson referred to the meeting the Community Services Board. He stated that they need
5 to determine some method of communication to inform the community of some of the issues.
6 He suggested that they discuss the topic at their annual goal-setting meeting.
7 Mayor Hodson stated that he has received a lot of positive response from the community of his
8 Coffee with the Mayor. He also stated that it has been suggested that they have a Coffee with
9 the Council.
10 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
11 None.
12 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
13 None.
14 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
15 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adjourn the meeting at 9:02 p.m.
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17 Respectfully submitted,
18 Courtney Seesz
19 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
20
21 ' Mayor
22 ATTEST:
23 City Clerk
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: February 12, 2002 Approval:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
Heating License:
Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Golden Valley,MN
General Contractors License:
Mochinski General Contractor Inc, Chisago City, MN
Northeast Tree &Timber, Minneapolis,MN
E{RC--F,INANCIAL._SYSTEM---- ---------- -- -- - --- -- - - ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE_
02/05/2002 16: Check Register GL540R-V06.40 PAGE ].
---.BANK ---------- .---VENDOR-._-...--____-- --- ------CHECK#----DATE--------------- ..._AMOUNT
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008216 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 20307 02/13/02 59.35
008696 A.J. GALLAGHER & CO. OF 20308 02/13/02 115.00
--...00831-1-.----ALL--SAINTS-BRANDS--DISTRI---- - ---20309--02/-13/02 ----------- 802.90
008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL . 20310 02/13/02 178.00
004225 ALLIANT FOODSERVICE 20311 02/1.3/02 3,441 .34
-----004.014=------ALLIED-RARER--CO.- --------- -- ---20312--02/13/02-----.. -.... -137.63.
004015 AMF_RIPRIDE= LINF_N 20313 02./13/02 447.00
008794 ARCTIC GLACIER ICE 20314 02/13/02 399.89
---------008692_-----.AT&T--BROADF{AND -------- -- ---20315-02-<-1:3/Oi?-------...---- _151 .62
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 20316 02/13/02 1 ,323.73
008827 BLACKEY'S BAKERY 20317 02/13/02 185.75
--------008124.-----.-CENTURY--SIGN-d,.-ADV--SPECI------ ---2033.8--02/13/02-- -- --- 30.92
004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO. , 20319 02/1.3/02 3,639.05
004085 CITY OF ST ANTHONY 20320 02/13/02 692.07
1.4--.---•-.CITY._WIDF_-WINDOW--SERVICE-----------20.321--0?-./-13/02- ---- ---- .....__ 34.08
004095 COCA COLA BOTTLING 20322 02/13/02 1 , 194. 1.8
004120 EAGLE WINE_ CO 20323 02/13/02 1 ,993.28
EAST_SIDE.-BEVERAGE--CO.--.------ --- =20324-02/13/.02. .-...------ 55,094.50
004130 ECOLAB 20325 02/13/02 443.34
004135 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC 20326 02/13/02 239.64
_. .----__001030.-----..G_$_K...SERVICES._INC--.---------- -- . 20327--02./13/02..----. ___.. _ . 655.05
004172 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC. 20328 02/13/02 1 ,992.00
004175 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 20329 02/1.3/02 11 ,793.85
..004201.- HEGGIES PIZZA--.------.- --- ----- ---- 20330 02/13/02 118.85
004207 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 20331 02/13/02 4,068.60
008252 HOME DEPOT-GECF 20332 02/13/02 21 .36
__._..._ .008860....__.__JCDK ._TELECOMM._INC__--___--- ---- ____20333__02/13/_0R- --- 232.35
004.220 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 20334 02/13/02 20, 140.92
004230 KUETHF_R DISTRIBUTING CO 20335 02/13/02 68,352.35
...R-ISK_.SE---. ___ ..20336-.02/13/02.. .---..-..... 1 ,283.75
004265 MARK VII SALES INC 20337 02/1.3/02 15,233.80
004263 MARKET AMERICA CORP. 20338 02/13/02 325.00
008263._._._._MCLEOD..USA,._INC.._-_.--TEC-.._-..__......_.__20339..02/13/02 .._. _ 666.94
004299 MPL.S. OXYGEN CO. 20340 02/13/02 10.56
008137 MURPHY'S SERVICE CENTER 20341 02/13/02 38. 18
NORTHEASTER_______.__-------____.-.- .-. 20342 .02/13/02 372.30
004339 NTN COMMUNICATIONS INC 20343 02/13/02 430.00
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 20344 02/13/02 38.67
-------- -.0 OZ-Lait5------ Ol_D_-DUT_CH__FOOD.S_INC__.--_-- 2034 ..02/_13/-02____ -43.,90
004354 PAUSTIS u SONS 20346 02/13/02 3,226.00
004355 PEPSI COLA COMPANY 20347 02/3.3/02 303. 13
004360 PHILL..IPS- WINE .&..SPIRITS__ 20348 .02/13/02 7, 109. 16
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 20349 02/13/02 6,053.01
008770 PORTER/WILLIAM 20350 02/13/02 67.00
.00001 PREMIERE= _ .. __ _ . - -- -- ------.------- --- 20351 02/13/02 66.50
004376 PRIOR, WINE CO 20352 02/13/02 2,639.93.
008787 PROMOTIONAL_ PAGES, INC. 20353 02./13/02 685.00
004385 QUALITY WINE CO 20354 02/.13/02 19,792.45
008597 R.D. HANSON ASSOC. , INC. 20355 02/13/02 307.50
.00002 ROSEDALE 20356 02/13/02 85.00
0.08199..__._-.SIGNATURE ._CONCEP-CS,--INC-.-__.,-___-20357_02/.13/.02--..-.--.--- - 84.92.
005004 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS 20358 02/13/02 63.90
008875 TRIO SUPPLY COMPANY 20359 02/13/02 391 .71
_008270-___UNITED-STATES. POSTAL__SER___.____.-___..20360-.02/13/02--.--.- .. _. . 100.00
003710 VAN 0 LITE INC 20361 02/3.3/02 74.38
004.494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 20362 02/13/02 327.43
008310.._..-...WINE_.MERCHANTS-_INC.._._..___....-__ ..___-.. 20363..-02/.1.3/02-- 659.70
004.499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC. 20364 02/13/02 686.00
003840 ZEP MFG COMPANY 20365 02/3.3/02 22.5.33
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 238,419.171 #
10
_E3RC._.E_lL�lANCSAL._.S-Y_STEM --ST. NTHONY__-VILLA
02/01/2002 10: Check: Register GL540R--VO6.40 PAGE
_{MANX -_ VEND-OR - CHECK#f—_DATE AMOUNT_----_-
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
. 008800 BREMER BANK NA - - 19947 01/31/02 --- 8,000; 00 _.
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19948 01/31/02 15,000.00
LTHE—
004.250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19950 01/31/02 180.00
004.141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 19951 01/31/02 3,642. .72 008800 BREMER BANK NA 19953 01/31/02 6,000.00
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19954 01/31/02 15,000.00
001_.0 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19956 01./31/02 180.00
008770 PORTER/WILLIAM 19957 01/31/02 67 .00
--.---- . --P_E.T_ER_EHLENZ_-..—----------.---------1.9-95G__O 1!_31.!_02_---------_.-------86.90._..
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19959 01/31/02 81000 .00
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19960 01./31/02 151000..00
. . . ..00.8716 -_ SCENE/-THE.---_ -------------------------.-_—_19.961_--0.1_/_.31./_O c'. 130.00 .
004250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 19962 01/31/02 180-.OC)
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 19963 01./31/02 3,240 .36
.______._.___.O.Oft2 29..- I_ARSON/.MICHAEL
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19965 01/31/0 ' 81000 .00
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19966 01/31/02 15,000.00
-,:SC-ENE_/_THE_.-_.. -------- -_.._---_L9.9.67___OL/_3.1
004-250 LUNDGREN/MATTHEW H. 1996801/31/02 180.00
008800 BREMER BANK NA 19969 01/31 /02 81000.00
00,9900 _...BREMER.._BANK. NA..-..-._ 19970---.01/31/.02 15,000.00 .
004141 FRITZ COMPANY, INC . 19971 01/31/02 2,200.00
008716 SCENE/THE 19972 01/31/02 130.00
. ..---.._._ .00_4.4_O.Q - . ST. ANTH N\ _LIQUO R.-#-1.---_ ---.-----------.1.9_973_._Oi./.3.1L02 ---.---------213.E>i.. . .
LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT 126,431 .23
! oA
. . .. --BRC-FINANCIAL=-SYSTEM-- ST-ANTHUPJY VILLA
- 02/06/2002 12: Check Register GL540R-VO6.40 PAGE
--F{ANK-- -----VENDOR-----' --- -------CNECK " --DATE-------- AhiUUPaT ----
FIRS BREMER BANK NA
008696 A. J . GALLAGHER & CO. OF 16868 02/ 1.3/02 785.00
008242 AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERV 16869 02/13/02 3,375.35
----0-08 ,7 1'-------AIRGAS "NORTH--CENTRAL------------- 16370-02.7-1:3/02 67 e 67
008621 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 16871 02/13/02 2, 155.00
008450 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, 16872 02/ 1.3/02 101. .73
007201 --- --APACHE--GROUP ----'- ' 16873 -02/13%02 ------- 1 ,075.25
008511 AT & T WIRELESS 16874 02/ 1.3/02 130 .76
- 008255 AVAYA, INC . 16875 02/13/02 29.32
008bb 1___ B_Z._.h AUTO- TRIM; INS . 1637b-027 13102 - ---- � .�•�'.
.00001 BASAP•A/DOUG 16877 02/1.3/02 50.00
000320 BEISSWENGER APPLIANCE 16878 02/ 1.3/02 228.57
------008062 -------BEST BUY - i.b8i9 0i/1�/Or 27ef 7 - --
008869 BORGF_N RADIATOR 16880 02/ 1.3/02 300.40
008734 BOSTON MEDICAL CORPORATI 16881 02/13/02 94.2.5
-- -
�000400_ _ - ._-BOYER- TRUCKS MINNEAPOI_I5 _ _ 16882._-02/ 1:3/ca?--_-. _
- 007253 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO 1.6883 02/13/02 24.00
008874 BROWN & CAMPBELL COMPANY 16884 02/ 1.3/02 2,241 .86
-CASTLE INSPECTION--SERVIC - --16885-02113/02 - ----- -_. 7,160 0 62- ._.
0082.91 CDW COMPUTER CENTER, INC 16886 02/1.3/02 89 .00
0081.24 CENTURY SIGN & ADV SPECI . 16887. 0?_/13/02. 154.65
----------008577 CITY OF-ST PAUL----- _..__.. - .. -16888--02/ 13/02 105. 00
000655 CL.AREY 'S SAFETY E:QUIPMEN 1.6889 02/ 13/02 102.62
004107 COMPTON 'S COMMF_RCIAL_ CLN 16890 02/ 1.3/02 3 ,706 .20
- ______000800 DAVIF_.S WATER 'E:QUIP "CO - 16891 02./13/02 614:32.
008429 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF 16892 02/ 13/02. 510.00
007371. DISCOUNT STEEL, INC . 16893 02/13/02 148.68
...008848 -DIVERSIFIED-CRYOGENICS' --- 16094--02/ 1. 102 -------117 .00
008666 EASYL.INK SERVICES CORPOR 1.6895 02/13/02 51 .50
008809 ELAN FINANCIAL_ SERVICES 16896 02/ 13/0 .. 102 .22
- - - - - 008284 ---ELECTION 'SYSTEMS--&- SOFTW----_ -.. 16S97-02/13/02 - - - ---133.-49
008683 EXEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL_, 16898 02/ 1.3/02 197 .00
008842 FABYANSKE, WESTRA & HART 16899 02/13/02 919.95
.16900 -02/ 13/02 --- ---63 : 43
`008 153 FIL.TERF=RSH ....... ... ..._._ ___ - -- - � � ----...._.
0082 .1 FOSTER,WENT7ELL,HEDBACK, 16901 02/13/02 4,000.00
008647 FRATTAL_L_ONE 'S HARDWARE 16302 02/.1.3/02 1 19.07
__-.-_-_--- 001025 - G & -K SERVICES -- --_ 16903 02/13/02 _. __. . -. 137.34
001030 G & K SERVICES INC 16904 02/ 13/0'2 35S . 47
.00002 GALLS INCORPORATED 16905 02/13/0 24.98
-- '------- 001 145----- - GLENWOOD--INGLEWOOD - -- - -- - 16906--03/13/0;,._._----- - -24v48-
001250
-'--2:4a4P,-..001250 GRAINGER INC/W W 16907 .02/13/02 624.95
007188 H & L MESABI INC 16908 02/ 13/02 700 .42
005121. HARTNAN/JAY 16909 02/13/02 108.34'
0014210 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 16910 02/13/02 1 , 105. 10
001505 HENN CO SHERIFF 16911 02/13/02 147.45
- - 001603 INDUSTRIAL_ DOOR -CO 16912 02/ 13/02 228 . 11
008658 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I 16913 02/13/02 63.00
008607 INTI_ ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF 16914 02/ 13/02 100. 00
008847 LAUGHTER/PAT 16915 02/13/02 140. 16
��
��
. .
,'----BRC-FINANCIAL�SYSTEM-------------------' ---�T�-��NTHONY--VIL[A'
-
02/06/2002 12: Check Register GL540R-VO6.40 PAGE
' �
-----------CHECK#---DATE---''----'---AMOUNT---'
---'BANK------'---VENDOR---'-----'------
-
` FIRS BREMERBANK NA �
' -__�___�-_-'_------__--_---_ -____`---
008
__-_�__ '��-----
OO8r91 LEAH 'KI UZ DESTGN 16916 02/13/02 98O.00
�
002040 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 16917 02/13/02 616.76
-BERKLEY-RISK-SE ---' ----- 6918-02/13/02------167924iOO --
-
007321 LOWELL 'S AUTOMOTIVE 16919 02/13/02 119.28
- .00003 MACQUEEN/JOHN 16920 02/13/02 398. 00
------OO8721----MASYS-CORPORATION-------- - - ---16921-02/13/02 - ---61070.50 -
' OO8710 MATRX MEDICAL INC . 16922 02/ 13/02 279.69
� OO8870 MAUTZ PAINT 16923 02/13/02 243.70
�-------OO8263 ----MCLEOD -USA j'-INC;-- ---TEC---- --' -16924 O2/13/02 '- - ''1T758w02-- -
OO7129 MEDTOX 16925 02/13/02 93.50
-
007835 METROCALL 16926 02/ 13/02 207 .75
�'�'------002240---METROPOLITAN 'COUNCIL-- - -- - -11927-02/13/02 ----- --- --35,-719.'20
'
- O08405 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI 16928 02/ 13/02 25.00
�
008423 MINNESOTA CHIEF OF POLIC 16929 02/13/02 20.77
` ------^JO236O----MN-CONWAYFIRE '& SAFETY - - 16930 - 02/13/02 -- - ----'48 ;65 -
008686 MUSKA ELECTRIC CO. 16931 02/13/02 4,596.33
002505 NARDINZ FIRE EQUIP CO 16932 02/ 13/02 81 .84
-- -.00004NORTH MEMORIAL' EMS ED. ' 16933 02/13/02 -- 950.00
002630 NORTH STAR TURF INC 16934 02/13/02 120.93
004334 NORTHEASTER 16935 02/13/02 107.60
--- 008350 - NORTHERN TOOL-& EQUIPMEN 16936 02713/02
008601 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER 16937 02/13/02 50.00
000045 OFFICE DEPOT 16938 02/ 13/02 1 ,278.34
-'--OO8O86 OFFICEMAX 16939 02/13/02 ' 62.60
001230 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC . 16940 02/ 13/02 51 . 15
008871 ONYZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 16941 02/13/02 135.8O
-- - 'OOB873 ' OPERATOR SERVICES 16942 O2/13/O2 ' - 80.00
008631 PARTS PLUS ROSEVILLE 16943 02/13/02 39.00
008594 PETERBILT NORTH ' 16944 02/ 13/02 5.42
--- -OO88O5 PETTY CASH - BREMER BANK 16945 02/13/02 ' - -135.38-
008271 PLETSCHER `S GREENHOUSE I 16946 02/ 13/02 43 .67
007057 PRAXAIR 16947 02/13/02 66.51
- ' .00005 -'PREMIERE CHOICE - � 16949 - 02/13/02 - -76 .50 '
16949 O2/13/O2 61 .27
00-1-492 QWEST ^
OO8372 QWEST INTEPRISE AMERICA, � 16950 02/ 13/O2 49 .95
- 002380 RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASC 16951 02/13/02 6, 142.74
.00006 ROSEDALE 16952 02/ 13/02 511 . 00
003100 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET 16953 02/13/02 126.95
'---_008653 ' ROSEVILLE FIRE GROUND ' 16954 02/13/02 --22;50
003350 SEH-RCM 16955 02/13/02 13,369.47
-
008199 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS, INC . 16956 02/ 13/02 169 .86
'
005306 SPRINGSTED, INC . 16957 02/13/02 2, 115.00
001810 ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE KIWA 16958 02/ 13/02 155 .00
OO8351 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT IN 16959 02/13/02 79.02
003490 STREICHER 'S 16960 02/ 13/02 165.08
009872 SUCIU/BARB 16961 02/13/02 64.60
008457 SWEEPER SERVICES 16962 02/ 13/02 4 ,306 .93
003260 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 16963 02/ 13/02 305.97
lo &
INANCIAL=SYSTEM------- -------- - --- --- -- -- -- --ST—ANTHOr-,IY-_VILL.
-- 02/06/2002 12: Check: Resister GL540R-V06.40 PAGE
HANK- -VENDOR--- — -- CHECK#- DATE--_ ----AM OUNT
FIRS BRE:MER BANK NA
008700 TC WEB TECH 16964 02/13/02.. 200.00
- 008755 THE MOBILE PHONE COMPANY 16965 02/13/02 127.70
.-- --007337-----T-fiMESAVER-OFF-SITE-..-SECRE------- 16966--OE/73/02------------369-.2-?-
003560 TRACY PRINTING 16967 02/13/02 430.96
- 008561 UNITED RENTALS COMPANY 16968 02/1.3/02 116.70
--_------008270------UNITED--STATES -POSTAL--'SER ---600:00---
008227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEV 16970 02/1.3/02 339.44
- 003700 VIKING INDUSTRIAL_ CENTER 16971 02/1.3/02 55.76
-- X05298------WARNII`IG,-L.ITES--OF ._MN ---- - -- --- 16972 -"02713/02- - ----- 14.-6 28----
- 004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 16973 02/1.3/02 260 .77
007324 WEST WELD 16974 02/13/02 190.85
----WSB--&-ASSOCIATES,-INC . --._.-___--- - -16975. 02/-1:-3/02--------306;926...68---
002680 XCEL ENERGY 16976 02/13/02 11 ,606. 16
000830 ZEE MEDICAL_ SERVICE 16977 02/1.3/02 101 . 16
BRE:ME:R BANK NA 454,358.29
Ill
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
NOTICE OF HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City of St.Anthony, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall at 7:00 P.M.,or as soon thereafter as possible, on February 12,2002 to consider making the
following improvements:
2002 Street Reconstruction,Storm Sewer,
Water main Improvements
This project consists of street reconstruction and replacement of watermain and storm sewer lines to be
done on the following streets:
1. Wilson Street,between 301 Avenue NE and 321 Avenue NE
2. Harding Street,between 301 Avenue NE and 31ST Avenue NE
3. 31"Avenue NE,between Wilson Street and Silver Lake Road
4. 32"d Avenue NE,between Edward Street and Belden Drive
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.011 to 429.111 portions of the improvement will be assessed to the
abutting property owners of the named streets. The estimated cost of the improvement is$2,400,000,00.
Such persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this
meeting.
Michael J. Mornson
City Manager
Publish: St.Anthony Bulletin
1. January 24,2002
2. January 31,2002
FAVIMitreetAnotiee hearing str imp wpd
12
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS FOR
2002 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
TIME AND PLACE GENERAL NATURE OF Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the
IMPROVEMENTS: City of St.Anthony,Minnesota,will meet in the
City Council Chambers in the City of St.Anthony
on the 12'day of February,2002,at 7:00 P.M.,or
as soon thereafter as possible,to consider
objections to the proposed assessments for 2002
Street Improvements,heretofore ordered by the
City Council.
ASSESSMENT ROLL OPEN TO INSPECTION: The proposed assessment roll is on file with the
City Clerk and open to public inspection.
AREA PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: The area proposed to be assessed consists of every
lot,piece or parcel of land benefitted by said
improvement,which has been ordered made is as
follows:
2002 Street and Utility Improvements Project .
This project consists of street reconstruction,
replacement of watermain and storm sewer lines to
be done on the following streets in the City of St.
Anthony:
1. Wilson Street between 30"Avenue NE and 32nd
Avenue NE
2. Harding Street,between 30"Avenue NE and
31 1 Avenue NE
3. 31°Avenue NE,between Wilson Street and
Silver Lake'Road
4. 321 Avenue NE,between Edward Street and
Belden Drive
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: The total amount proposed to be assessed is
$310,000.00
PROPOSED AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED TO Attached is the proposed assessment amount for
EACH PARCEL: each parcel included in the 2002 Street
Reconstruction Project.
WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS: Written or oral objections will be considered at the
hearing.
FAWMStreetAnotiee bearing auen wpd
13
RIGHT OF APPEAL: An owner of property to be assessed may appeal .
the assessment to the district court of Hennepin
County pursuant to the Minnesota Statutes,Section
429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the
Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30,days after the
adoption of the assessment and filing such notice
with the district court within ten days after service
upon the Mayor Clerk.
LIMITATION OF APPEAL: No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
assessment adopted by the City Council unless a
written objection signed by the affected property
owner is filed with the Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the presiding
officer at the hearing. All objections to the
assessments not received at the assessment hearing
in the manner prescribed by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.061 are waived,unless the failure to
object at the assessment hearing is due to a
reasonable cause.
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS: Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
Sections 435.193 to 435.195,the City may,at its
discretion,defer the payment of assessments for
any homestead property owned by a person 65
years of age or older for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments.
MAILED NOTICE: The notice of this hearing mailed to property
owners contains additional information.
Michael J.Morrison
City Manager
Published: St. Anthony Bulletin
1. January 24,2002
2. January 31,2002
FAWMStreetalnotiee hearing assess wpd
14
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02-023
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR
VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for various public
improvements is 35% assessable as follows:
First First
Year Year
Years L91_3L Collectible Assessed
15 2002 2003 $309,100.93
for improvements to the following:
• Wilson Street, between 30`h Avenue NE and 32nd Avenue NE
• Harding Street, between 30`h Avenue NE and 3151 Avenue NE
• 31St Avenue NE, between Wilson Street and Silver Lake Road
• 32nd Avenue NE, between Edward Street and Belden Drive
These assessments are against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has
been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance
with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly.published, as
required by law that this Council would meet to hear,consider and pass upon all objections,if any,
and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public inspection and
an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections if any, to such
proposed assessments.
2. This Council,having heard and considered all objections so presented; finds that each of the lots,
pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefitted
by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite
the description of each such lot,piece and parcel of land respectively,and such amount so set out
is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described.
3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessments
for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each
parcel, together with interest at the rate calculated at 2% over the prime rate at the time of
assessment per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid,shall be a lien concurrent with
general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not pre-paid
shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as
indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire
assessment for the period of January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2003, will be payable with
general taxes for the levy year of 2002 collectible in 2003, and one of each of the remaining
installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be
payable with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid.
15
Resolution 02-023
Page 2
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification, make payments
(partial or full)towards the balance owed. The owner may,at any time after certification,pay the.
whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest be
charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 30th of the assessment year.
5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified
duplicate of the assessment roll,with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set
forth separately,to be extended upon the property tax lists of the County and the County Auditor
shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law.
Adopted this day of
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
16
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02-024
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID FOR 2002 STREET
AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement'for bids for the improvement as shown on the plan for the
above referenced project,bids were received,opened and tabulated according to law,and
the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Bidder/Address Total Bid
S M Hentges & Sons $1.929,814.52
Forest Lake Construction $1,942,485.95
Northdale Construction Co. $1,972,768.02
Park Construction $2,006,916.02
Arcon Construction Co. $2,068,717.87
C S McCrossan Construction $2,127,858.65
Friedges Contr. Co. LLC $2,176,716.59
Lametti & Sons Inc. $2,262,398.86
Barbarossa& Sons $2,393,626.93
WHEREAS, •it appears that S.M.Hentges&Sons,Inc.of Jordan,MN is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony:
1. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $1,929,814.52 in the name of the City of St.
Anthony, Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above referenced project according to
the plans and specifications, therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
2. The Engineer, WSB, Inc. is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two
lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted this day of ,
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
WB 17
&Associates,Inc.
December 20, 2001
Honorable Mayor and City Council
c/o Mike Morrison
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Re: 2002 Street Reconstruction, Storm Sewer, Watermain,
Sanitary Sewer & Appurtenant Work
City of St. Anthony, MN
WSB Project No. 1065-59
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bids were received for the above-referenced project on December 20, 2001, and were
opened and read aloud. A total of nine bids were received. The bids were checked for
mathematical accuracy and tabulated. Please find enclosed the bid tabulation indicating
the low bidder as S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Jordan, MN, in the amount of
$1,929,814.52.
We recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award a contract to S. M.
Hentges & Sons, Inc.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, 1 .
Todd E. Hubmer, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosures
4150 Olson
c: Jay Hartman, City of St. Anthony
Memorial Highway S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.
Suite 300
Minneapolis nm
Minnesota
55422
763.541.4800
763.541.1700 FAX F:\WPW[N\1065-59\recmmdtn Itr.doc Minneapolis - St.Cloud - Equal Opportunity Employer
18
BID TABULATION
2002 STREET RECONSTRUCTION,STORM SEWER,WATERMAIN,ANITARY SEWER&APPURT W
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY, MN
WSB PROJECT NO. 1065-59
Bids Opened: December 20, 2001 -10:00 A.M.
Contractor Bid Security Total Bid
1 S M HENTGES &SONS X $1,929,814.52 **
2 FOREST LAKE CONTR X $1,942,485.95
3 NORTHDALE CONST CO X $1,972,768.02
4 PARK CONST CO X $2,006,916.02 **
5 ARCON CONST CO INC X $2,068,717.87 **
6 C S MCCROSSAN CONST X $2,127,858.65
7 FRIEDGES CONTR CO LLC X $2,176,716.59 **
8 LAMETTI & SONS INC X $2,262,398.86 *'
9 BARBAROSSA&SONS X $2,393,626.93
Engineer's Estimate $1,878,739.35
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation the bids as received on December 20, 2001.
odd E. Hubmer, P.E.
** Denotes corrected figure
F:\wpwin\1065-59\EXCEL\bidtab\Bid Summary
19
RESOLUTION 02-025
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION
RAPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2002
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony(the
City), as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The City Council has ordered various improvement
projects under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (collectively, the Improvements). To
finance the Improvements, it is determined to be in the best interests of the City to issue
its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2002 in the principal amount of
$1,500,000(the Bonds),pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475.
Section 2. Terms of Proposal. Springsted Incorporated, financial
consultant to the City, has presented to this Council a form of Terms of Proposal for sale
of the Bonds,which is attached hereto and hereby approved and shall be placed on file
with the City Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of the Terms of Proposal are hereby
adopted as the terms and conditions of the Bonds and of the sale thereof. Springsted
Incorporated, as independent financial advisors,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
475.60, Subdivision 2,paragraph(9) is hereby authorized to solicit bids for the Bonds on
behalf of the City on a negotiated basis.
Section 3. Sale Meeting. This Council shall meet at the City Hall on
Tuesday,March 12, 2002 at 7:00 o'clock P.M. for the purpose of considering sealed bids
for the purchase of the Bonds, and of taking such action thereon as may be in the best
interests of the City.
Section 4. Reimbursement of Costs from Proceeds of the Bonds. All or a
portion of the costs of the Improvements may be paid by the City prior to the issuance of
the Bonds to finance the Improvements, and to the extent such costs are paid by the City
prior to the issuance of the Bonds it is the reasonable intent of the City to reimburse all or
a portion of the costs of the Improvements paid by the City prior to the issuance of the
Bonds from the proceeds of the Bonds.
Adopted this 12`x'day of February,2002.
Attest:
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for administration.
City Manager
2®
ST. ANTHONY LIQUOR OPERATIONS
2001 Annual Report
Background
The City of St. Anthony owns and operates two off-sale liquor stores and one on-sale bar
and restaurant. The operation has a full time operations manager, a store manager at
each off-sale store and a bar/restaurant manager. We also employ a full time lead liquor
clerk for each off-sale operation, a full time bookkeeper and a full time bartender. In
addition to the full time staff, the off-sale stores have 20 part time clerks and the
Stonehouse has 20 part time employees.
Summary of Sales
The City of St. Anthony's liquor operations experienced increased sales during 2001
when compared to 2000. Sales at store #1, located next to the Stonehouse, increased
$67,000.00. Sales at store #2, located at Apache Plaza, increased $156,000.00. The
Stonehouse experienced a$3,000.00 decrease in sales. Overall, sales increased
$220,000.00 for the liquor operation.
We attribute this sales summary to many factors. Some of these factors include, but are
not limited to the following:
• Aggressive promotion plan for the off-sale stores.
• Increased wine selection and wine tastings.
• Additional full time lead clerk to assist with customer service.
• Continued society trends toward the reluctance to drink and drive have contributed to
slightly fewer sales at the Stonehouse Bar& Grill.
Recap of 2001 Activities
We continued with our annual promotions such as the Villagefest"Kick-off party in the
parking lot", The Stonehouse golf tournament and "Pig Skin Pick's"contest where
customers at the Stonehouse can pick the winners of each week in the NFL. In addition,
off-sale store#2 held a Bratwurst cookout hosted by Jim Beam Brands and 1919
Rootbeer.
During 2001, the off-sale stores continued to expand on our fine wine selection. These
wines represent a higher quality and price point that the wines that we have stocked in
the past. Customer response was positive. We experienced an increase in attendance
for our wine tastings. Not only did our wine sales increase but we were also awarded
"Best Wine Selection" in the annual "Reader's Choice Awards" held by the Lillie
Suburban Newspaper.
An additional full time Lead Liquor Clerk position was added to the off-sale operation
during the year 2001. The Lead liquor Clerk position was added to assist us with an
additional supervisory position and provide a higher level of customer service.
21
Liquor Operations
Page 2
Liquor operation staff attended various educational seminars for the sale of alcoholic
beverages. Our operation successfully passed all but one of the tobacco and alcohol
compliance checks performed by the Police Department. A part time staff member that
was employed 19 hours failed to check the identification of a customer purchasing
tobacco. That particular employee attended a training session regarding age verification
the day prior to the illegal sale.
I have included the following facts concerning our sales breakdown between off-sale
stores.
Store #1 served 126,683 customers during the year 2001. The average sale amount was
$16.07.
Store #2 served 117,078 customers during the year 2001.The average sale amount was
$18.40.
Store #2 sales were $118,427.00 higher than Store#1.
Liquor sales accounted for$1,256,640.00 at both stores, an increase of$71,800 over
2000.
• Store #2 sold$133,923.00 more than Store #1 in liquor.
Beer sales accounted for$1,827,258.00 at both stores, an increase of$110,531 over
2000.
• Store #1 sold $96,141.00 more than Store #2 in beer.
Wine sales accounted for$898,195.00 at both stores, an increase of$39,411 over 2000.
• Store #2 sold $123,290.00 more than Store #1 in wine.
Tobacco sales accounted for$114,188.00 in sales at both stores, a decrease of$14,000
over 2000.
• Store #1 sold $37,3900 more than Store#2 in tobacco.
Mix and Misc. sales accounted for$96,066.00 in sales, an increase of$2,800 over 2000.
• Store #1 sold $6,300 more than Store #2 in mix and misc. items.
22
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02-026
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE
STANDING RULES FOR CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS FOR THE YEAR 2002
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2002,by approval of Resolution 02-011, the City Council adopted
The Standing Rules for Conduct of City Council Meetings for the year 2002; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the St. Anthony City Council to amend the Rules as noted on the
attached Rules.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby approves the amendment to the Standing Rules for Conduct of City Council Meetings for
the Year 2002, as noted in the document attached herewith.
Adopted this day of , 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
23
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2002
STANDING RULES FOR CONDUCT OF
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
INTRODUCTION
In the belief that the best decisions are made by the best informed decision makers and
that the public decision process is best served when the public has every opportunity to
present views, the following rules are established to govern regular and special Council
meetings as well as formal public hearings. There are several goals behind these rules.
In general, free and open discussion by all interested parties should be an
essential part of the decision-making process.
The Council process should have as little procedural overhead as possible.
Time is better spent on substantial matters rather than performa matters.
MEMBERSHIP
The formal Council membership consists of the four Councilmembers and the Mayor. All
five have.one vote each and all five can introduce motions. For purposes of leading the .
meeting, the Mayor, or in the absence of the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tem., will be .
considered the Chairperson. A quorum of the Council is three members. A quorum is
required to do official business.
Meetings of the Council shall be held at City Hall on the second and fourth Tuesday of
each month at 7:00 pm. The meeting he'd on the second Tuesday of the menth will be
eendueted ast study session and only Gouneffil business deerned neeessaiy by the
Gounei'membeis andici Gity Managei will be aeted upon. The Getineil meeting he'd on the
fetiI th Tuesday of the menth will be eendtieted.as a regtilar Goundil meeting during VV
Council work sessions will be called from time to time as the Mayor and Council deem
necessa . Work sessions will typically be held on the first Tuesday of the month and will
be-gin-at-7.00 m.
RULES
Order of Business
The following shall be the order of business of the Council:
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
24
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM - Individuals may address the City Council about any item
not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the
podium, state their name and address for the secretary's record, and limit their
remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action
on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a
future report or direct that the matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and will a enacted by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
STAFF REPORTS
GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL
REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS AND CITY MANAGER
INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
Agenda
To be considered, an item must be on the agenda and the agenda must be distributed
to all the Councilmembers and any other persons having responsibility for an item at
least three working days prior to the meeting. An agenda can be modified with
addenda by a majority vote but this should be used only for minor items or items with
extreme time constraints.
An item can be moved from the consent agenda to the action agenda at the request of
any Councilmember.
Since there will be audience and cable TV viewers not familiar with each item, the
-2-
25
chair will give a brief explanation of each item as it is addressed.
The order of items on the agenda need not be followed absolutely. The Mayor may
adjust the order in the interest of:
• Filling in time before a scheduled item, i.e., a public hearing.
• Grouping several items to best make use of consultant time.
• Accommodating individuals who have attended the meeting specifically to
provide input on an item.
Process - Regular and Special Council Meetings
For these proceedings the Council will use the "open discussion" procedure. That is,
i cussion is en to an member before or after a motion is made. This privilege is
ds p y P 9
also extended to the City Manager, and any of the consultants who may have an
interest in or can contribute to the item at hand.
This pivilege is also extended to these members of the atidienee whe wish to provid-e-
irtelevent.
The Mayor can make liberal use of the "unanimous consent" procedure. That is, items
that in the judgement of the Mayor are likely to be unanimously approved can be
introduced for approval with the statement: "If there are no objections..........stands
approved (or denied)." If any Council member has an objection, the item reverts to the
standard motion procedure. This "unanimous consent" procedure cannot be used for
items requiring formal votes, i.e., resolutions or for approval of the consent agenda.
only be made to be eensider The standard motion procedure is that each motion
requires a second. This also applies to amendments. Any motion, by any member, shall
be reduced to writing upon request of any member. No motion shall be put to a vote
until it has been stated by the recorder at the request of any member of the Council.
To eliminate confusion, only one amendment will be considered at a time and that
amendment must be germane to the motion. An amendment cannot itself be amended.
If a change to an amendment is deemed appropriate, the amendment should be
withdrawn and reintroduced accordingly.
The general mode of voting will be by acclamation but with enough clarity that the
individual votes can be recorded in the minutes. If in doubt, the clerk can request
clarification. Each individual's vote will be entered in the minutes.
-3-
26
Any member may abstain from voting or disqualify himself/herself. The reason for
disqualification or abstention must be stated by the member and entered into the
minutes. If a member disqualifies himself/herself, he/she may leave the room while the
issue is being considered.
Roberts Rules of Order (Revised) shall govern the Council procedures not covered by
the Standing Rules of the Council.
The meeting will be video taped and the tape will be retained for 3 months following
approval of the minutes of the meeting. The standard retention can be extended if in
the judgement of the Mayor, City Manager, City Clerk or any Councilmember, such
action is warranted.
If the Council action is the result of a resident request and that request is denied in
whole or in part, reasons of the fact supporting the denial will be made part of the
public record.
No eoctimewl meeting will extend beyond 10.80 PIVI except by unanimatis vote. This tile
is not atibject to the modifleation ei stisp isions of the Standing Rules.
Process - Public Hearings
Since a public hearing is a more formal procedure and often requires certain procedures
and actions to be legal, the meeting rules are changed accordingly.
The primary aim of a public hearing is to take input from the public. To accomplish this
in the most effective manner, the Mayor will introduce the hearing with an explanation
of the issues. The Mayor will give this explanation or a person designated by the
Mayor. The use of explanatory visual aids is encouraged.
Following the explanation, input from the public will be taken. Prior to accepting
input, though, the Mayor will state the areas where input will be appropriate, the
maximum time to be allotted to any individual presenter and any other procedural rules
deemed appropriate to guarantee that all concerned parties have a fair and adequate
opportunity to be heard.
All individuals wishing to speak must fill out and submit identification form and speak
into a recording microphone. Individuals not wishing to speak in public may provide a
written statement. The Council may take up to 15 minutes to review written
statements presented at the meeting. If the Council decides not to act on the issue at
the public hearing meeting, it may by majority vote extend the time where written
input will be taken to a day not later than 1 week before the next meeting where a
deciding vote is planned.
-4-
27
All speakers are expected to be business-like, to-the-point and courteous. Anyone not
abiding by these rules will be considered to be out of order.
The Council will refrain from initiating a discussion during the pubic input phase of the
hearing except to clarify points brought up.
Once the public testimony phase is complete, the Mayor will announce the public
hearing to be closed and the Council will revert back to its open discussion mode of
operation. From this point on, public input will only be appropriate when solicited by
the Council.
It shall.be the intent of the Council to vote on the issue at the same meeting as the
public hearing and as close in time to the public hearing as possible. Should it be
necessary to defer voting until a later date, the procedure will be clearly explained to
the audience.
No publie hearing will extend beyamd 10:00 PIVI.
If the motion contains conditions, as may occur in conditional use or variance
requests, those conditions will be conveyed in writing to the requestor.
If the public hearing is the result of a resident request and that request is denied in
whole or in part, reasons of fact supporting the denial will be made part of the public
record.
If the public hearing is to set an assessment rate, the assessment formula(s) under
discussion cannot be altered. This implies that the Council has fully discussed any
formulas prior to the hearing and that the appropriate legal, fiscal and engineering
consultants have passed on formula(s) viability, legality, and feasibility.
If the hearing is to set an assessment, it cannot be scheduled later than the first
meeting in September. This is to allow time to correct errors prior to the time needed
to certify the rolls to the county.
MAYOR PRO TEM
The Mayor Pro Tem shall be appointed in January of each year. The first Mayor Pro
Tem after adoption of this rule shall be the Councilmember with the most continuous
time on the Council. The position shall then be rotated among Councilmembers based
on time of continuous service. If two or more members have identical seniority, the
appointment shall be based on alphabetical order by last name. A Councilmember may
not serve as Mayor Pro Tem twice until all other Councilmembers have been Mayor Pro
Tem.
-5-
A Councilmember may decline the appointment for good cause and maintain his/her .
place in the rotation for appointment the following year.
-ADOPTION/MODIFICATION/SUSPENSION
These rules with the exeeption of the rnend8tOFY 10.30 PM adjournm can be
adopted, modified or suspended in whole or in part by a majority vote of the Council.
If suspended, they are automatically reinstated at the next meeting.
ANNUAL REVIEW
These rules will be reviewed annually at the first meeting in January.
INTERPRETATION
The Mayor will interpret the rules. However, the Mayor's interpretation can be
appealed by any Councilmember and can be overruled by a majority vote.
-6-
2
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 29, 2002
TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: CITIZENS LEAGUE TAX REPORT
Per your direction, I have reviewed the Star Tribune article that reviewed the Citizens
League Tax Report. The article ranked the amount of property taxes, paid by 109 Metro
Communities on a$130,000 home.
In addition, Council member Amy Sparks shared her concerns at our goal setting retreat.
The data is as follows:
Property Taxes 2001: .(Overall Ranking 8a')
County $ 621.17 Rank 6`h (Seven County Metro)
City $ 500.67 Rank 26`h
School $ 819.97 Rank 12th
Special Taxing Districts 137.91 Rank 17th
Net taxes $2,079.72
Property Taxes 2000: (Overall Ranking 18`h)
County $ 654.70 Rank 60' (Seven County Metro)
City $ 501.52 Rank 27`h
School $ 736.73 Rank 20`h
Special Taxing Districts 143.21 Rank 15th
Net Taxes $2,036.16
When comparing 2001 property taxes to 2000, the"City Portion" of property taxes paid
was virtually identical for both years. In addition, the"City Ranking" stayed in the same
general area as it was in the previous year(27th to 26`h).
The most significant change in ranking was that of School District#282. Their rank
changed from 20`h in 2000 to 12`h in 2001, which contributes to the overall ranking
changing form 18`h in 2000 to 8`h in 2001.
30
Statistics from the County indicate the School District's levy in 2001 was $5.8 Million,
compared to$5.1 in 2000. Their levy is comprised of several components, including; 1)
Operating; 2) Voter approved levies; 3) Community Services; and 4)Debt levy.
The unfairness in the system seems to be that an $83.24 School District increase in taxes
equates to the overall ranking changing from 18`h to 8t' (the total tax bill only increased
$43.56).
31
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 30, 2002
TO: Mike Mornson,City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: GOVENOR'S PROPOSED BUDGET CUTS
As we are all aware,the State Legislature will discuss their$2 billion dollar budget
shortfall in the in their upcoming session.
Current proposals include balancing the budget with a combination of revenue
enhancements (gas tax, cigarette tax,etc.) and a reduction in State spending. The cuts
being discussed could have a significant affect on all Cities including St. Anthony. At
this time, we should focus on the fact that they are proposals that are not set in stone.
Under the Governor's proposed cuts Local Government Aid(LGA) would be impacted
significantly. His proposal has the City of St. Anthony receiving the following cuts:
2002:
Growth Based LGA Cut $ 97,751
LGA Base Cut $ 43,514
MV Credit Reduction 8,954
Total Proposed Cut $150,219
2003:
Additional Proposed Cut $ 55,254
Total 2 year reduction in Aid $205,473
For the sake of discussion, let us assume that the Governor's proposal was passed. The
issue on hand becomes, "How does the City of St. Anthony deal with the potential loss
of revenue totaling$205,473?"
Ultimately, it means that St. Anthony would have to make adjustments to its General
Fund operating budget through revenue enhancements or budget cuts.
Property Records and Revenue Page;
32
Quick Links '
{ Site Map Metro Links
News Contact Directory
iProperty Records and Revenue Departments Home Page
Main Page II Directory II Pay Property Taxes II View Property Information
Property Information
Property ID 31.30.23.34.0016
Property Address 3800 SILVER LAKE RD NE
ST. ANTHONY
Payable Tax Year 2001
Tax $188,895.48
Special Assessment(s) ($40,081.48)
Total Tax & Spec Assess $148,814.00
School District St. Anthony(282)
Watershed District Rice Creek W/S
Values
Homestead Status None
Estimated Land Market $3,881,200
Estimated Building Market $100
Total Estimated Market , $3,881,300
Total Limited Market $0
Disclaimer:
Values-the estimated market value used to calculate the taxes shown above.
For example,the payable year 2001 taxes are based on the property's January 2,2000 estimated market value.
If any adjustments were made,they will not appear here.
Call or email Pro en Taxlnfo@Co.Ramse .MN.US for additional information.
Last Qualified Sale
Sale info for this property is not available
Building Characteristics
Type Commercial
Lot Size(acres) 25.46
Legal Description(This is a partial legal description)
Plat or Sec Twn & Range Description SILVER LAKE CENTER
Tax Description THAT PART OF LOT 7 BLK 1 IN T.I.9G
1992Y
Back to Search Form I
http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/prr/propert.../Search2.asp?enyear---2001&enparc=31302334001 1/30/2002
February 8, 2002
'!"tho
flla
aFUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues
February 26 Regular Prosser Financial strategies
Planning Commission report
Fire Personnel Res. fire contract for 2002-2003
Ord. massage therapy(2°d reading)
Review Tanner letter on candle manufacturing on
37'b
March 12 Regular Res.,Police contracts with Lauderdale&Falcon
Heights
B. Thistle Res.,Award sale of bonds for 2002 street
improvements
T. Doolittle Preview of Board of Review
• Ord. massage therapy(3`d reading)
March 26 Regular Jay Hartman Annual Public Works report for 2001
April 9 Regular Board of Review
Dick Engstrom Annual Police report for 2001
April 23 Regular Joel Hewitt Annual Fire report for 2001
Public hearing on 2003 City budget
May 14 Regular Roger Larson Annual Finance report for 2001
Presentation of 2001 City audit
May 28 Regular
•
December 2001 City of St.Anthony
Profit&Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE 12/31/01 12/31/00 (Decrease)
Sales $222,857.00 $286,216.00 $71,919.00 $4,962,143.00 $4,742,093.00 $220,050.00
Less: Cost of Goods Sold $174,485.00 $228,566.00 $24,813.00 $3,572,647.00 $3,432,132.00 $140,515.00
Gross Profit $48,372.00 $57,650.00 $47,106.00 $1,389,496.00 $1,309,961.00 $79,535.00
Ratio to Net Sales 21.71% 20.14% 65.50% 28.00% 27.62%
Operating Expense:
Salaries, Wages, Benefits $17,584.00 $15,298.00 $23,298.00 $629,943.00 $593,932.00 $36,011.00
All Other Expenses $12,174.00 $15,616.00 $20,781.00 $523,499.00 $551,770.00 ($28,271.00)
Total Operating Expense $29,758.00 $30,914.00 $44,079.00 $1,153,442.00 $1,145,702.00 $7,740.00
Ratio to Net Sales 13.35% 10.80% 61.29% 23.24% 24.16%
Profit from Operations $18,614.00 $26,736.00 $3,027.00 $236,054.00 $164,259.00 $71,795.00
Other Income $707.00 $109.00 $3,360.00 $59,438.00 $53,563.00 $5,875.00
Net Income $19,321.00 $26,845.00 $6,387.00 $295,492.00 $217,822.00 $77,670.00
Ratio to Net Sales 8.67% 9.38% 8.88% 5.95% 4.59%
December-Net Income $52,553.00
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 12/31/01 $111,757.00 $120,477.00 $63,258.00 $295,492.00
YEAR TO DATE 12/31/00 $90,192.00 $96,047.00 $31,583.00 $217,822.00 (Audited)
INCREASE/DECREASE $21,565.00 $24,430.00 $31,675.00 $77,670.00
December-2001 City of St. Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I SAV II
Beginning Inventory: $230,703.16 Beginning Inventory. $267,111.34
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers: SAV 1 $3,192.21 Transfers ($3,192.21)
Stonehouse ($7,534.98) Adjustments $67.34
Adjustments $720.86 Returns to Vendors ($5,078.15)
Returns to Vendors ($1,699.88)
Add: Receiving $186,716.95
Add: Receiving $145,388.75
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($228,633.63).
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($175,205.60)
TOTAL $216,991.64
TOTAL $195,564.52
Total per Valuation Report $217,933.08
Total per Valuation Report $194,584.65
Difference $941.44
Difference ($979.87)
Beginning January 2002 Inventory $194,584.65 Beginning January 2002 Inventory . $217,933.08
"'Comes from Valuation Report "'Comes from Valuation Report
2000 Actual Profits (Audited) 2001 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAV 1 SAV II Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Stonehouse Profits . Comparison
January $2,469.00 $2,043.00 $4.496.00 $9,008.00 January $4,972.00 $5,329.00 ($1,851.00) $8,450.00 ($558.00)
February $411.00 $4,119.00 ($4,306.00) $9,232.00 February $7,218.00 $6,065.00 $9,410.00 $31,143.00 $21,911.00
March $7,815.00 $9,720.00 $9,039.00 $35,806.00 March $9,510.00 $7,064.00 $7,510.00 $55,227.00 $19,421.00
April $13,057.00 $10,593.00 $6,060.00 $65,516.00 - April $5,631.00 $4,295.00 $10,712.00 $75,865.00 $10,349.00
May $9,857.00 $11,127.00 ($600.00) $85,900.00 May $5,705.00 $6,957.00 $1,372.00 $89,899.00 $3,999.00
June $12,282.00 $11,484.00 $141.00 $109,807.00 June $16,325.00 $14,485.00 $2,734.00 $123,443.00 $13,636.00
July $8,419.00 $8,395.00 ($259.00) $126,362.00 July $9,392.00 $12,077.00 $3,712.00 $148,624.00 $22,262.00
August $802.00 $4,610.00 $5,301.00 $137,075.00 August $3,986.00 $8,106.00 $3,261.00 $163,977.00 $26,902.00
September $12,633.00 $6,169.00 $2,295.00 $158,172.00 September $12,586.00 $10,394.00 $4,417.00 $191,374.00 $33,202.00
October $5,686.00 $3,068.00 ($898.00) $166,028.00 October $6,104.00 $7,558.00 $2,934.00 $207,970.00 $41,942.00
November $7,169.00 $10,392.00 $6,272.00 $189,861.00 November $11,007.00 $11,302.00 $12,660.00 $242,939.00 $53,078.00
December $9,592.00 $14.327.00 $4,042.00 $217,822.00 December $19,321.00 $26,845.00 $6,387.00 $295,492.00 $77,670.00
Total $90,192.00 $96,047.00 $31,583.00 $217,822.00 Total $111,757.00 $120,477.00 $63,258.00 $295,492.00
Increase/(Decrease) $21,565.00 $24,430.00 $31,675.00 $77,670.00
Y-T-D By Store
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: January 2002
Expenditures: Mean Average
8%
01/31/2002 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T D Balance Spent Budget
Mayor/Council $56,300.00 $1,978.15 $54,321.85 4% 96%
Intergovernmental Relations $20,100.00 $2,770.00 $17,330.00 14% 86%
Cable Franchise $19,900.00 $273.38 $19,626.62 1% 99%
General Management $86,600.00 $6,993.02 $79,606.98 8% 92%
Elections $24,400.00 $975.85 $23,424.15 4% 96%
Finance/Insurance $208,200.00 $5,174.05 $203,025.95 2% 98%
Finance/Assessing $39,100.00 $94.37 $39,005.63 0% 100%
Legal $69,800.00 $0.00 $69,800.00 0% 100%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,500.00 $68.55 $2,431.45 3% 97%
City Buildings $112,500.00 $1,925.24 $110,574.76 20/. 98%
Civil Defense $43,700.00 $1,517.21 $42,182.79 3% 97%
Police Protection $1,061,200.00 $54,927.89 $1,006,272.11 5% 95%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $5191200.00 $26,931.86 $492,268.14 5% 95%
Fire Protection $555,900.00 $29,773.70 $526,126.30 5% 95%
Inspections/Building Permits $75,900.00 $519.74 $75,380.26 1% 99%
Animal Control $3,600.00 $474.14 $3,125.86 13% 87%
Public Works $395,200.00 $9,825.02 $385,374.98 2% 98%
Public Works/Maintenance& Repair $121,200.00 $1,998.59 $119,201.41 2% ' 98%
Tree and Weed Care $27,000.00 $967.33 $26,032.67 4% 96%
Parks $109,200.00 $4,618.21 $104,581.79 46% 96%
Transfers to other Funds $75,000.00 $0.00 $75,000.00 0% 100%
Budget Reserves/Non Budgeted $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0%. : 0%
Total Expenditures $3,626,500.00 $151,806.30 $3,474,693.70 4% 96%
Stormwater Fund - Cash on Hand 01wrim
Projeted
Revenues: Fundina Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $1,573,370.60
MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $935,008.45
DNR $4,000,000.00 $3,950,000.00
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Stone Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $509,556.32
Stone Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1.594.271.55
Total Project Budget $9,610,000.00 $9,412,206.92
Other Prolect Activity:
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75
HRA-Streetscape Transfer $0.00 $155,100.00
Met Council . $20,000.00 $10,000.00
Storrnwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $87,445.12
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700&2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
29th Avenue-Water Connection Fees $26,000.00 $26,400.00
Misc.-Homeowner/Reirnburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 538.877.50
Total Revenues $9,937,000.00 $10,046,045.56
01/31/2002
Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Date
WSB-Engineering Services $343,189.40
Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey&Whitney-Legal Services $36,911.64
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025.00
Purchase of Flood Homes $939,166.64
Pahl Avenue Ponding $107,438.69
Flood Relief Grant Program $65,159.32
Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master $17,371.44
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,032,032.10
2000 Street Improvement Project $2,732,547.58
2001 Street Improvement Project $1,594,190.51
2002 Street Improvement Project $75,118.05
Harding Street Holding Ponds $893,750.83
Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1.521.134.99
Total Expenditures $9,362,992.18
Project Balance $683,053.38
Storrnwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $866,232.08
• -
EXPENDITURE REPORT 01/31/1002 •
WSB: Flood Rellef Grant Program: 2001 Strom Improvement Project
Project Description: Expenditure8 Project Description: Expenditures Project Description:
Water Resource Management Plan S12,191.50 Deralb/Pe"Gault S10,000.00 WSB-Engineering Services 5223,393.72
Water Managemerd Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kczarek $10,000.00 Ulle Suburban Newspapers $38.75
Seormwater Task Fords Engbremtr529, 08.8243.00 ThomastSusan Hoban SM.00 Hage Concrete Works $2,358.53
Stormwater g 533.88 Jude Sexton $1,004.53 Olson's Plumbing $221.90
Flood Problem Analysis $27,819.98 Visage Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE S5,280.00 Sandness Construction $4,850.00
MCES Grant Application $1,72425 Castle Buk"8 Remodeling-3301 Edward SL $10,000.00 Band Issuance $21,183.48
DNR/FEMA Grants $11,754.48 LN.Soding-3480 Penrod Lane $800.00 Park Construction 51.342.348.13
Sump Pump fnapectton Program $5,083.43 J 8 0 Landscaping-3480 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 Total 2001 Street Project $1,594,190.51
Park Design $155,089.10 SL Anthony Health Center-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00
N Study, $28,331.00 RiteWay Waterproofing-2928 Crestview Avenue 5390.00 2002 Street Improvement Project
Flood Gram-1998/199920002001 S27-jj16,;lQ Pine Cone Nursery-3480 Penrod Lane $9,22280 Project Description:
Total WSB $343,189.40 Lamers Concrete-Flood Proofing improvement $4,41200 WSB-Engineering Samloea $88,34200
McCaren Designs.Inc. $703.99 Dorsey 8 Whitney $709.89
Barr Engineering: Minnehaha Falls Landscaping $5.597.50 Construction Bulletin $215.18
Project Description: Elgard Excavating Company $1,245.00 Pipe Services Corp. S5,851,gQ
District e8 Watershed Study ;2,709.35 Twin Cities Glass Block 51.312.50 Total 2002 Street Project $75,118.05
Total Ban Engineering $2,709.35 Total Flood Relief Program $85,159.32
Dorsey&Whitney: Private Homes-OumpetemServloe Master Harding Street HoldhM Ponds
Pmod Description: Project Description: Project Description: Expenditures
Legal Services for Flooding Issues $17,911.18 Waste Management 5381.95 WSB-Engineering Services $105,498.05
Legal Services-Comdenatlonof Hanes $18,120.25 Service Master $13,78229 Bettendorf Rohrer $30,075.00
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue S2,111M.23 Nang Myhran $259.50 Secant Nature Lawn 5241,974.07
Total Dorsey 8 Whitney $38,911.84 tarda Gader $198.00 Residential Easements $432,183.78
Susan Kozarek $925.00 Dorsey 8 Whitney/Legal $29,908.47
Water Quality Study: Elaine Nelson 51,085.00 STS Consultants $3,235.00
Silver lake: Sue Wenker $250.00 Evergreen Land Services $19,519.88
Rios Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Barkley RlskMsuanoe Claim-Payment S500, Construction Bufliteri $358.48
Total Dumpsters $17,371.44 Albrecht Inc. $20,21522
Purchase of Homes: Comdemnadon Co mmisabners $8,455.10
Project Description: Sump Pump Old Republic-Abstract Fees S2,330,Qct
Network Title,Inc. 5255.00 Project Description: Total Harding Street Holding Ponds 5893.750.83
Purchase of 2718 SL Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Line $131.00
Demolition $9,158.00 Ullie Suburban News-Advertisement 5115.84 Silver PWM ParkrConstructlon
Taxes $839.81 Total Sump PumplMisc. $248.84 Project Description:
Legal Services-Dorsey 8 VAO*y 5225.00 Richard Knutson,ire, $1,488,031.72
Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $385.00 1999 Street Improvement Project Sandness Construction $15,478.00
Seal 8 Cap Well $1,450.00 Project Description: Muska Electric $29,44217
Purchase of 2713 SL Anthony Boulevard $147,878.13 WSB-Engineering Services 5173,970.02 Trillium Park 7710.183.10
Demolition $11,258.00 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services 58,835.85 Total Sliver Point Parc $1,521,134.99
L09W Services-Attorney Fees for Seger $0,845.00 Nathdals Construction $834,978.40
Recording DeedTaxes $2,508.98 Treemendous 5480.00
Title Insurance '$946.00 Dorsey 8 Whitney $2,911.55
Seal 8 Cap Well $1,420.00 Balt Issuance Expense 510.875.28
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,087.10 Total 1999 Street Project $1,032,032.10
Purchase of 27002704-Pahl Avenue $301,411.45
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue $298,07200 2000 Street Improvement Project
First American Title $375.00 Project Description:
Evergreen Land Services 53.389.47 WSB-Engineering Services $300,333.93
Total Purchase of Hanes $939,188.84 Barbarossa 8 Sons,Inc. $2,199,371.31
ECEL Energy $155,100.00
Pahl Avenue Pondhtg: Buchem Environmental Services 52,24&99
Project Description: Berkley Risk Services S10,000.00
WSB-Engineering Services 520,987.18 AOState Insurance Company $312.78
G b L Conshucti n $88.498.54 SL Paul Companies $18,884.98
Treemendcus $14,480.90 Uglie Suburan NewspapemCarstruction Bulletin $23293
Pipe Services $3,85920 Albredt,Inc $891.75
Construction Bul1ten $1.432.20 Fabyanske 8 Westra-Legal CostlUtIgatlon $8,027.70
Little Suburban News-Advertisement Band Issuance Expense, 539.143.23
Taal Pahl Avenue Fording $107,438.89 Taal 2000 Street Project S2,732,547.58
, a q
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
February 12, 2002
Call to Order
Roll Call
I. Approval of February 12, 2002 H.R.A. Agenda
II. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which
event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
1. Approve January 22, 2002 H.R.A. Minutes. (p. 1)
2. Claims. (p:2)
III. General Policy Business of the H.R.A.
IV. Staff Reports.
V. H.R.A. Commissioner Comments.
VI. - Information and Announcements.
IX. Adjournment.
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
4
5 January 22, 2002
. 6 -
7 CALL TO ORDER
8 Chair Hodson called the meeting to order at 9:03 p.m.
9
10 ROLL CALL.
11 Commissioners present: Chair Hodson; Commissioners Sparks, Thuesen, Horst, and Faust.
12 Commissioners absent: None.
13 Also present: Executive Director Michael Mornson and City Attorney Jerome
14 Gilligan.
15
16 I. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 22, 2002 H.R.A. AGENDA.
17 Motion by Commissioner Sparks to approve the January 22, 2002 Housing and Redevelopment
18 Authority Agenda as presented.
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20
21 I1. CONSENT AGENDA.
22 Motion by Commissioner Thuesen to approve the Consent Agenda,which consisted of:
23
24 1. Approve January 8, 2002 H.R.A. Minutes.
2. Claims.
6
- 27 Motion carried unanimously.
28
BA GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
30 None.
31
BY. STAFF REPORTS.
33 Mornson indicated that they should be closing on the Hardee's property on February 1, 2002.
34
M H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.
36 Commissioner Faust stated that he would like to publicly thank City Staff and Fire Chief Hewitt for
37 enforcement of the housing code. He indicated that he has been by Exhaust Pro,.and stated that
38 all of the cars are gone. He thanked the Fire Department for their work.
39
W. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
41 None.
42
43 VII. ADJOURNMENT.
44 Motion by Commissioner Faust to adjourn the meeting at 9:06 p.m.
45
46 Motion carried unanimously.
�7 Respectfully submitted,
8 Courtney Seesz,
49 TimeSaver Of,j`'Site Secretarial, Inc.
Following are the verified claims for the February 12,2002 (HRA)
1. Dahlgren, Shardlow &Uban........................................$560.13
N/W Quadrant—Master Plan
2. City of St. Anthony.................................................$65,936.11
Salary Transfer to General Fund(2001)
3. Four Points - Sheridan. .............................................$2,450.67
Goal Setting/City Council &Staff
4. Jay Hartman.................................................................$545.92
Goal Setting/City Council & Staff
5. Hennepin County. .....................................................$1,719.89
TIF Administrative Costs/2001
6. Northfield Lines, Inc........................:...........................$308.00
® N/W Quadrant Bus Tour 2/9/02
7. Springsted, Inc. .........................................................$2,507.85
TIF Cash Flow Update
8. Tracy Printing. ..........................................................$2,493.40
N/W Quadrant Newsletters
9. WSB, Inc......................................................................$204.50
Salvation Army Camp