HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 06112002 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
102966
BOX: 29
Folder: CC PACKETS 2001-2004
Document: CC PACKET 06112002
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
_, • Our mission is to be a progressive and livable community,
a walkable village, which is safe and secure.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
June 11, 2002
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, Discussion, and Possible Action on All of the Following Items:
I. Approval of June 11, 2002 City Council Meeting Agenda. Action requested.,
II. Proclamations and Recognitions.
1. Proclamation declaring National Night Out. Action requested. (p. 1)
III: Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the
regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name
and address for the Clerk's record and limit their remarks to five minutes.
Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this
time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the
matter be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IV. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda
and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
1. Consider May 28, 2002 Council meeting minutes. (pp. 2 - 11)
2. Consider licenses and permits. (p. 12)
3. Consider payment of claims. (pp. 13 - 15)
4. Resolution 02-051, re: Amendment to local government information
systems (LOGIS). (pp. 16 - 20)
Page 2
5. Resolution 02-052, re: Community Development Block Grand and HOME
• Programs. (pp. 21 - 31)
V. Public Hearings.
VI. Reports From Commissions and Staff.
1, Presentation from the Housing Resource Center(see enclosed packet).
2. Resolution 02-053, re: Joint Powers Agreement with Roseville relating to a
Police Tactical Team. Chief Engstrom will be present. Action requested.
(pp. 32 - 37)
3. Discussion of parking options around the St. Anthony High School. (pp. 38
- 39)
VII. General Policy Business of the Council.
VIII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers. (p. 40)
IX. Information and Announcements.
X. Miscellaneous'Informational Documents. .
XI. Adjournment.
1
'n any
ill e
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is sponsoring a unique,
nationwide crime and drug prevention program on August 6, 2002, called
"National Night Out"; and
WHEREAS, the "19th Annual National Night Out"provides a unique opportunity for St.
Anthony to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country
in promoting cooperative,police-community crime and drug prevention efforts;
and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony plays a vital role in assisting the St. Anthony Police
Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in St. Anthony and
is supporting "National Night Out 2002"locally; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of the City of St. Anthony be aware of the
importance of crime prevention programs and impact that their participation
can have on reducing crime and drug abuse in the City of St. Anthony; and
WHEREAS, police-community partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and
cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out"program.
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the St. Anthony City Council, do hereby call upon all citizens of the
City of St. Anthony to join the St. Anthony Police Department and the National Association of
Town Watch in supporting "19th Annual National Night Out"on August 6, 2002.
FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOL VED, THAT WE, THE ST. ANTHONY CITY COUNCIL, do
hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 6, 2002 as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT"in the City of St.
Anthony.
Mayor
Date
. 2
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 May 28, 2002
6
7 CALL TO ORDER
8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
9
10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust.
15 Absent: None.
16 Also Present: City Manager Mike Morrison; City Attorney Jerry Gilligan.
17
18 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 I. APPROVAL OF MAY 28, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
22 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, second by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve the City
23 Council Meeting Agenda of May 28, 2002.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
28 None.
29
30 III. COMMUNITY FORUM.
31 Mayor Hodson invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items
32 that are not on the regular agenda.
33
34 Hearing none, Mayor Hodson moved forward with the agenda.
35
36 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
37
38 1. Consider May 14, 2002 Council meeting minutes.
39 2. Consider licenses and permits.
40 3. Consider payment of claims.
41 4. Resolution 02-047, re: Approve Insurance Renewal.
42 5. Resolution 02-048, re: Approve waiving of tort limits.
43
44 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, second by Councilmember Faust, to approve the Consent
45 Agenda with the following amendment: remove item number one from the Consent Agenda.
46
47 Motion carried unanimously.
48
3
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 28, 2002
Page 2
1 Motion by Councilmember Faust, second by Councilmember Sparks, to approve the City
2 Council meeting minutes of May 14, 2002.
3
4 Motion carried 4-0, Councilmember Thuesen abstained.
5
6 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
7 None.
8
9 VI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
10 A. Ramsey County Library Board will present update.
11 Matt Anderson, Pres of Ramsey County Library Board of Trustees,came forward to
12 provide the Council with information regarding the Ramsey County library, and budget
13 cuts.
14
15 Anderson stated that, last year, the Ramsey County Library had a 7% increase in
16 circulation, and indicated that they were on track to do the same in 2002.
17
18 Anderson indicated that the Ramsey County Library has been asked to meet a levy limit
19 for 2003 that is 7% lower than their current operations budget. He added that he is
20. present tonight to ask for a show of support by St. Anthony, as several residents of St.
21 Anthony use the Ramsey County Library services, for them to maintain enough funding
22 in order to maintain their current levels of operations at all seven facilities.
23
24 Anderson stated that St. Anthony has approximately 1100 active members who use the
25 Ramsey County Library services.
26
27 Anderson stated that they are not looking to expand, nor build new facilities, but to
28 maintain their current levels of operation. He stated that if they have to absorb a 7%
29 decrease in their budget, they would likely have to close several of their facilities.
30
31 Anderson stated that he was asking for the municipalities in suburban Ramsey County to
32 pass a resolution that the Ramsey County Library Board of Trustees can take on to the
33 Ramsey County Board of Commissioners which shows that the people of Ramsey County
34 do support their current levels of operations for 2003 and would like to have the funding
35 allocated to their budget to be able to continue providing those services.
36
37 Anderson clarified that what he was asking for tonight is a show of support, and
38 recognition that library services are important to the people of St. Anthony Village.
39
40. Councilmember Horst asked which library was the nearest to St. Anthony Village.
41 Anderson stated that the Roseville library was the closest to St. Anthony.
42
43 Councilmember Faust asked why they are being singled out as an entity to take a 7% cut.
44 Anderson stated that they are not being singled out, and that all Ramsey County
45 departments have been asked to decrease their levy budget by 7%.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 28, 2002
Page 3
1
2 Mayor Hodson clarified that they were not asking for funding. Anderson stated that was
3 true, and that they were asking for a show of support.
4
5 Councilmember Sparks stated that she was very supportive of the Ramsey County
6 Library, and an active card member herself.
7
8 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, second by Councilmember Horst, to approve the
9 proposed resolution which states that St. Anthony Village acknowledges its support for
10 the Ramsey County Library's 2003 request to maintain current levels of operation at its
11 facilities.
12
13 Councilmember Faust stated that he had difficulty from a philosophical aspect with
14 interfering in the Ramsey County Commissioner's affairs. He stated that he is an active
15 card-holder, and supports the efforts, yet is not comfortable telling the Ramsey County
16 Commissioners that the Library is more important than something else when he does not
17 have their full budget in front of them.
18
19 Anderson stated that they met with the suburban Ramsey County Commissioners who are
20 responsible for their budget upon receiving their budget request, and were asked to go out
21 and get a show of support from the cities, so that when they go back to the full board,
22 they can present the support.
23
24 Councilmember Sparks stated that the commissioners were testing things, and she felt it
25 important to say that they do care by passing this resolution.
26
27 Councilmember Faust reiterated that it was-not anti-books, but was uncomfortable with
28 making decisions for the Ramsey County Commissioners.
29
30 Councilmember Horst stated that they were not meddling in dollars and cents, but
31 showing support that the library be maintained, if it was possible.
32
33 Motion carried 4-1, Councilmember Faust opposed.
34
35 B. Jill Schultz JMS Communications will present a communication plan for City goals:
36 1.Liq_uor licensing referendum.
37 2.Public Works/Fire Station.
38 Schultz came forward and provided the Council with her background. She stated that the
39 types of work that she does is related to referendums, media relations, development of
40 public facilities, redevelopment, and other communications and public involvement
41 issues that cities face. She added that the goal of her work is to help the city of St.
42 Anthony know that the community has been involved.
43
44 Schultz stated that there are four important things that they do in a referendum process:
45 identify the problem/need, want people involved in process and understanding the
46 process, identify options, and a selected option.
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 28, 2002
Page 4
1 Schultz stated that the City of St. Anthony understands that the process is really fluid one.
2 She indicated that the Council plays an important role in the process, as people are
-. 3 coming to them with issues and questions.
4
5 Schultz suggested that, rather than spend time reviewing the details of the drafts that she
6 has compiled, that she respond to any questions that the Council has of her-at this time.
7
8 Councilmember Thuesen referred to Shultz's past experience, and asked what other
9 experience she has had in working with referendums. Schultz responded that she worked
10 with the Cities of Richfield, Blaine and Mound with referendums.
11
12 Councilmember Sparks stated that she still struggled with the difference between On-Sale
13 and Off-Sale Liquor operations. She stated that she did not think that they could use the
14 term and expect others to understand. Schultz suggested that they define the two from
15 the beginning and continue to re-define them as they continue through the process.
16
17 Councilmember Horst suggested that they provide a definition in parentheses of the two
18 types of liquor operations in parentheses following each term.
19
20 Councilmember Sparks asked how her firm would work with the potential task force.
21 Schultz indicated that it still needed to be determined, but stated that she would work
22 with the key individual staff and work with a plan as a behind-the scenes person.
23
24 Mayor Hodson thanked Schultz for her work thus far and stated that she would provide
25 the help that they need as they face the tasks ahead of them.
26
27 C. Jeny Gilligan, Dorsey& Whitney. will present Resolution 02-046, re: Approval of
28 Special Election of the Question of Issuance of On-Sale Liquor Licenses and Question of
29 Issuance of Sunday On-Sale Liquor Licenses.
30 Gilligan stated that, presently, the city is not authorized to issue liquor licenses to
31 privately owned restaurants. He stated that, if the Special Election is approves, and the
32 question passes, then the City would have to adopt an ordinance sending forth the
33 requirements. Furthermore, if approved, then the City can issue up to six licenses.
34
35 Gilligan stated that the operation of the Stonehouse is not affected, nor would it be
36 counted as one of the six. Gilligan also indicated that it does not affect the city's On-Sale
37 and Off-Sale Liquor operations.
38
39 Gilligan stated that the resolution calls for the election to be held in conjunction with the
40 State General Election on November 5, 2002. He added that the earliest that it could be
41 held was with the State Primary Election in September.
42
43 Councilmember Faust clarified that their would be two separate questions on the ballot.
44 He asked if it were possible to pass one, both,or none to pass. Gilligan stated that was
45 true.
46
47 Mayor Hodson stated that the reason that they were going down this path was due to the
48 Northwest Quadrant project and examining this as a viable option. He continued that, if
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 6
May 28, 2002
Page 5
1 it the Sunday On-Sale Liquor License resolution passed, the city would have the ability to
2 issue licenses to restaurants that come into town. Gilligan stated that was correct.
3
4 Mayor Hodson went on to clarify that the city had the ability to set limits_in the
5 ordinance.
6
7 Councilmember Thuesen stated that they need to be certain to set parameters that attempt
8 to attract a certain type of establishment.
9
10 Councilmember Horst suggested that they have a work session prior to the Special
11 Election to determine the language and qualifications of the ordinance.
12
13 Gilligan stated that the City could authorize up to six licenses, and as little as one.
14
15 Motion by Councilmember Faust, second by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve
16 Resolution 02-046, re: Approval of a Special Election on the question of issuance of
17 On-Sale Liquor Licenses and on the question of issuance of Sunday On-Sale Liquor
18 Licenses.
19
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21
22 D. Resolution Proposal 02-049, re: Approval of proposal for construction/manager services
23 for Kraus-Anderson.
24 Mayor Hodson stated that they are seeking potential guidance in examining some options
25 for the Fire Station and Public Works Building. He clarified that they are not contracting
26 with Kraus-Anderson at this time to build.
27
28 Mornson stated that the task force would not be comprised until after Labor Day
29 weekend, as he felt that interest from the public would be greater at that time.
30
31 Mayor Hodson asked Mornson if he had a sense of size ofthe potential task force.
32 Mornson stated that there was no limit for the past two task forces that were compiled. It
33 was determined that the Council would not set a limit at this point.
34
35 Councilmember Thuesen asked if there was the need to give Kraus-Anderson and the
36 task force some parameters with which to work. Mayor Hodson concurred, adding that
37 the residents of St. Anthony need to be comfortable with everything that will be involved
38 in the process.
39
40 Councilmember Horst asked for clarification on what they were discussing at this time.
41 Mornson stated that what was before them was a standard construction/management
42 contract that could be terminated within seven days. Mayor Hodson clarified that the
43 contract only commits them to up to $7,500.
44
45 Councilmember Horst asked why they were getting into the details of things at this point.
46 Mayor Hodson stated that they wanted the information up front, before any decisions are
47 made.
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes ,
May 28, 2002
Page 6
1 Mornson stated that all of Councilmember Horst's concerns would be addressed by the
2 task force.
3 Councilmember Faust stated that having two councilmembers on the task force would
4 benefit communication's between the task force and the City Council.
5
6 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, second by Councilmember Faust, to approve
7 Resolution 02-049, re: Approval of proposal for construction/manager services for Kraus-
8 Anderson.
9
10 Motion carried unanimously.
11
12 E. Todd Hubmer, WSB, engineering update.
13 Hubmer came forward to update the Council on three items that need action: Flood
14 Hazard Mitigation Grant from the DNR, Silver Lane Feasibility study, 2003 Street
15 Reconstruction feasibility study.
16
17 Hubmer stated that the legislature approved $30 million for the Flood Hazard Mitigation
18 Plan and that St. Anthony is included in the plan. He stated that$15 million can be
19 allocated immediately, and the other$15 million is on hold until July of 2003. Hubmer
20 indicated that the DNR is going to send out a letter to each if the eligible municipalities
21 concerning what they can spend within the next twelve months.
22
23 Hubmer stated that the City of St. Anthony has to be cautious not to request more money
24 than they need in the next twelve months because, if they do not expend the money in
25 2003, St. Anthony will be placed at the bottom of the priority list in 2003.
26
27 Hubmer stated that he would return in June with an update as to the status of the money
28 for the Flood Hazard and Mitigation Plan.
29
30 Councilmember Horst stated that he thought that they needed the entire $2 million this
31 year in order to complete all of the projects that are currently under contract. Hubmer
32 stated that they needed about $250,000 to complete the rest of the projects this year.
33
34 Hubmer referred to the Silver Lane Feasibility Study to address flooding in and around
35 the intersections of Fordham Drive and Shamrock Drive with Silver Lane and 391h
36 Avenue. Hubmer identified Problem Area Number One: Southeast quadrant of the
37 intersection of Silver Lane and Shamrock Drive; and Problem Area Number Two: North
38 of 39`h Avenue, between Shamrock Drive and Fordham Drive.
39
40 Hubmer added that the purpose of the feasibility study is to identify alternatives which
41 provide 100-year flood protection to homes located within the two problem areas. He
42 stated that this feasibility study identifies five alternatives.
43
44 Hubmer stated that the five alternatives were developed to accommodate the storm water
45 runoff, which causes the flooding in the two problem areas near Silver Lane.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes S
May 28, 2002
Page 7
1 Alternative number one: provide a 100-year flood protection by replacing the existing
2 storm sewer with a new system with increased flow capacity. The cost to complete this
3 alternative is approximately$2,868,000.
4
5 Alternative number two: also increases sewer capacity by utilizing the existing storm
6 sewer system and constructing a new parallel storm sewer system. The total estimated
7 cost to complete this alternative is approximately$1,996,000.
8
9 Alternative number three: consists of constructing a storm water detention pond in
10 Emerald Park. The estimated cost of this alternative is approximately $1,333,000.
11
12 Alternative number four: proposes to eliminate the recurring flood problems through the
13 purchase and demolition of four homes in the vicinity of Problem Area Number One and
14 construct a storm water detention pond to store the runoff Problem Area Number Two.
15 The estimated cost of this alternative is approximately$1,629,000 to $2,095,000.
16
17 Alternative number five: provides a 100-year flood protection through a combination of
18 home purchase, demolition, construction of a holding pond and flood proofing of
19 adjacent structures. The estimated cost of this alternative is approximately$630,000 to
20 $745,000.
21
22 Hubmer indicated that they were recommending that the Council give consideration to
23 alternative number five for.several reasons:
24 • It is the least expensive alternative presented in this feasibility study with an
25 opinion of probable cost of$630,000 to $745,000.
26 • The construction cost to convert Emerald Park into a storm water holding pond
27 does not take into consideration the value that this park provides in recreational
28 opportunities to St. Anthony Village residents.
29 • Alternatives number one and number two require the City of St. Anthony Village
30 to improve storm water capacity in Ramsey County Judicial Ditch Number 3.
31 The Rice Creek Watershed District is the governing authority responsible for the
32 operation and maintenance of Ramsey County Judicial Ditch Number 3. The City
33 of St. Anthony Village could petition the Rice Creek Watershed District to
34 improve the capacity of this ditch system.
35 • Alternatives number one and number two may require the City of St. Anthony to
36 find funding sources other than the Department of Natural Resources Flood
37 Mitigation Grant Funds to implement improvements to a judicial ditch.
38 • Alternatives number 3, 4, and 5 would all be eligible for funding under the DNR
39 Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant.
40 • Alternative number five removes the most frequently damaged and significantly
41 damaged structure from the flood problem area.
42 • With the construction of the storm water basin, depths and reoccurring flood
43 intervals of the intersection of Silver Lane and Shamrock Drive may be reduced,
44 but not completely eliminated.
45
46 Hubmer added that Alternative number five will not completely eliminate the street
47 flooding present at Silver Lane and Shamrock Drive nor the flooding present at 39`h
48 Avenue. It is proposed that the remaining street flooding be corrected in the future, either
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 9
May 28, 2002
Page 8
1 through construction of improvements to Ramsey County JD-3 by the RCWD, or by
2 constructing storm water storage within St. Anthony as redevelopment occurs.
3
4 Councilmember Faust confirmed that, with alternative number five, they still had to take
5 one home.
6
7 Councilmember Sparks asked if the homeowners of 4029 Shamrock Drive are aware of
8 the purchasing and demolishing their home. Hubmer stated that they have been in
9 contact with the homeowners since the floods of 1997, and that they were present this
10 evening.
11
12 Hubmer stated that they currently do not have the funding in-hand from the DNR for an
13 implementation of the project, but requested that they give consideration to hiring an
14 appraiser to appraise the home and enter into negotiations of purchasing the property
15 contingent upon the City receiving their funds from the DNR.
16
17 Motion by Councilmember Faust, second by Councilmember Horst, to approve that WSB
18 proceed with alternative number five and get an appraisal and enter into negotiation with
19 the effective property-owner and contingent upon receiving the DNR funds.
20
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22
23 Councilmember Thuesen asked Hubmer to address attempts that have been made'to.
24 resolve sewer back up. Hubmer identified the different areas and projects which have
25 addressed the sewer back-up problems.
26
27 Hubmer reviewed the 2003 Street Reconstruction Project:
28 • 34`h Avenue NE, between Stinson Boulevard and Silver Lake Road.
29 • Belden Drive, between 33rd Avenue NE and 30 Avenue NE.
30 • Edward Street NE, between 33rd Avenue NE and 34`h Avenue NE.
31
32 By construction of the roadways and utilities, and to assess the benefited property
33 for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
34 Chapter 429.
35
36 Motion by Councilmember Faust, second by Councilmember Sparks, to approve
37 Resolution 02-050, re: Ordering preparation of report on 2003 Street and Utility
38 Improvements.
39
40 Motion carried unanimously.
41
42 Hubmer stated that the City of St. Anthony has been working with the Mississippi
43 Watershed Organization for additional funding. He indicated that they requested
44 $120,000 from the MWO, which they have received.
45
46 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
47 None.
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 10
May 28, 2002
Page 9
1 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
2 Morrison indicated that he and Mayor Hodson met with the Hennepin and Ramsey County
3 Commissioners, Metropolitan Council staff and part of the Three-Rivers Park District to lay the
4 groundwork for the upcoming lobbying day on June 25, 2002. He stated-that they will comprise
5 an agenda for the day, including a bus tour of the site.
6
7 Mornson stated that the Planning Commission meeting was cancelled this week, and asked if it
8 was the opinion of the Council to revise the ordinance that was on their agenda, providing a
9 better definition of gross floor area. The Council stated that they would like a better definition.
10
11 Councilmember Horst indicated that there was a suggestion at the last "Coffee with the Mayor"
12 that a sign/map of the plan for the Central Park project be placed in the Community Center as
13 well as at the park site.
14
15 Mornson stated that he would look into the best location for the map.
16
17 Councilmember Horst commended Councilmembers Faust and Sparks with their efforts on the
18 Flood Mitigation Grant.
19
20 Councilmember Sparks stated that the City of St. Anthony will be receiving more money in 2002
21 from the MWO than they are putting in for a few years. She added that they are very receptive
22 to another request for next year's budget.
23
24 Councilmember Thuesen stated that he hoped that the residents of the community have taken the
25 opportunity to see the new library.
26
27 Councilmember Faust stated that he hoped that it was the last time that they had to vote to take a
28 home.
29
30 Councilmember Faust stated that he has appreciated Councilmember Sparks' efforts, as well as
31 those efforts of Todd Hubmer and Mike Mornson, as they have all been very instrumental in
32 guiding the Council through the confusing legislative session.
33
34 Mayor Hodson highlighted another issue that came out of the"Coffee with the Mayor"which
35 was 37`h Avenue. He indicated that he would discuss the area with Jay Hartman.
36
37 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
38 None.
39
40 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
41 None.
42
43 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
44 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, second by Councilmember Sparks, to adjourn the meeting
45 at 9:13 p.m.
46
47 Motion carried unanimously.
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 11
May 28, 2002
Page 10
1 Respectfully submitted,
2
3
4 Courtney Seesz
5 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
6
7 Mayor
8 ATTEST:
9 City Clerk
12
Saint Anthony Village
DATE June 11, 2002 . Approval
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Judy Monson, License Clerk
ITEM: Licenses and Permits for Approval:
Heating Contractors License:
Elite Heating & Air Conditioning, St. Michael, MN
Multiple Dwelling License:
Location: Owner/Property Manager:
3605 —3615 —37`h Avenue NE Dale A. Robertson
1102 Pike Lake Circle, New Brighton, MN
3701 Chandler Drive Limited Partnership/J. Goodman,President
1107 Hazeltine Blvd #200, Chaska, MN
2600 Kenzie Terrace Lang-Nelson Associates, Inc.
4601 Excelsior Boulevard, Mpls., MN
13 -
F rC-�'�iVARtCI t=SYS'TEi` ST:ANTHONY-VILLAGE
06/04/2002 11 : Check: Register GL540R-VO6.40 PAGE
--BANK CHECK#--- DATE AMOUNT - --
FIRS BREMER BANE: NA
b02240 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 17817 0012/02 31 ,225.60
002280 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 17818 06/12/02 93.67
- I5-T rtirDWE_ST`GREAT-DIANE=KOLST 78-1'-7--06-77' 202-------5 4TT 92-- --
007308 MIDWEST SPECIALTY SALES 17820 06/12/02 6.30
008905 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF 17821 06/ 12/02 225.00
_- 006269- --n NNE_SO7TA-SRREDDlNG-LC 7822-0677.-2.7-02-- - 5-ti-.9 -- -
002395 MT! DISTRIBUTING, INC 17823 06/ 12/02 56. 66
008884 MURLOWSKI PROPERTIES 17824 06/12/02 27.90
002630 NORTH STAR, TURF INC 17 826 06/12/02 146.97
005176 NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICA 17827 06/12/02 11 ,926 .39
-- f OM45 F I-C-E DE PO I 826- S Z02' -'].�Ja U --
008528 PACE ANALYTICAL_ SERVICES 17829 06/12/02 16.00
008271 PLETSC:HER 'S GREENHOUSE I 17830 06/12/02 379. 16
- 00x4-3 7^c. P LttN K E TT- S 17'9 a r-asz i.c '=-- -5-17.!-,q----
007057 PRAXAIR 17832 06/12/02 17.7;'
.00001 R. I .HAAGENSON, INC . 17933 06/12/02 117022 .00
005293 ROAD RUNNER 17935 06/12/02 10.4 5
00e&3 ROSE:VILLE FIRE GROUND 17836' 06/12/02 9.00
---00Ft02 RYHt7; Lffht:tFEF'-M.
008376 S. M. HENTGES SONS, INC 17838 06/12/02 95,33 ,. 2'.9
003310 SEARS ROEBUCK cF CO 17239 06/12/02 50.86
--- 003,x$2 SEEDORF'F hir+SOI�tP`f II'.tDtISTP, -f84�Ci6/-1�7-02 -9;=.�e r;:-------
003155 ST ANTHONY FIRE RELIEF A 17841 06/12/02 6,000.00
008448 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSI 17842 06/12/02 700.00
7342-G6i 7.eriC�i'---_ _-___._-1 c.r'a L T_-._-___-._
003490 STRE:ICHER 'S 17844 06/12/02 34.95
.00003 SYRACUSE UNIV PRESS 17845 06/12/02 45.00
-- .00007 T--F.-CAMPBELL-CO. , IN -i 846-067-12/02----- ------54.2 0- -
008700 TC WEB TECH 17847 06/ 12/02 314. 00
007337 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE 17848 06/12/02 363.88
003560 TRACY PRINTING 17850 06/12/02 274.
008695 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT AN 17S51 06/ 1202. 61 .77
- t}t3t331� fiWTN`-C iTY-:iRE?-CAP6R - -- Jcai tc /C7c ---:s i q 5>fJ ---
.01=001 TWIN CITY HYDRO SEEDING 17853 06/ 12/02 1 ,298.20
004481 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 17854 06/12/02 62.73
7855 a jT 2t0cr ---
008_'•61 UNITED RENTALS COMPANY 17856 06/12/02 108.51.
009227 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELL EV 17357 06/ 12/02 11964 . 0
RIG-SUTPLY--- --1 785S-01-/12 0 - -- ----- -42.80.. - -
003700 VIKING INDUSTRIAL_ CENTER 17859 06/ 12/02_' 23.96
005293 WARNING LITES OF MN 17860 06/12/02 93. 1._>
-Er037`3= -WA3-TE-MGt~iT- ------------17861-CY6tir/0:;:-------- -- - -1,;�,-•_..;3�,- -._ -
00:3920 LAHL E:GUIPMENT COMPANY 17862 06/12/02 25.63
-204v!07. 66-
.F
ifRC---F-3�A T—P 14
Z 06/05/2002 07: Check: Register GL540OV06.40 NAut
:a
S BANK VENDOR _ `# —t7AT MOtJN-T
LIAR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
j� 008216 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 20757 06/12/02 111 .30
008311 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRI 20758 06/12/02 1 ,747. 17
G
8714 ARCTTe-at_A?l 57 7-c�-76-
008692 AUT BROADBAND 20760 06/12/02 151 .62
004293 BELLBOY CORP. 20761 06/12/02 1 ,024.94
00 27 BLACKE PAA y
004080 CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO. , 20763 06/1.2/02 2,933.65
004095 COCA COLA BOTTLING 20764 06/12/02 1 ,332.32
eOB557 DAILEY DATA 2070 if 2 c2.4"u
000820 DORSEY & WHITNEY 20766 06/12/02 2,311 .55
Ej 004120 EAGLE WINE CO 20767 06/ 12/02 2,449 .98
f E E-R€G c 6-81t�67-f`2 fG2—i `9fl-
j 004135 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC 20769 06/ 1.2./02 169.34
! 008838 F & M CIGAR COMPANY 20770 06/12/02 250,99
6 ES-i<I 0111-? t27`f7c. t ` -
008706 GCS SERVICE, INC 20772 06/12/02 471 .7;
.00001 GOLF SCORE CRDS 20773 06/ 12/02 386,00
A �075 3 -
004201 HF_GGIES PIZZA 20775 06/1.2/02 144. 10
004207 HOHENSTE:IN 'S, INC 20776 06/12/02 6,823.75
-004-2 r-- Jf3f i Seis -EIRE-THE1IsCI-f?ktB 07w-0-wf2jt7`c? t-i 124on92--
004230 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 20778 06/12/02 59, 216.7()
i 002040 LILLIF_ . SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE 20779 06/12/02 347 .00
— -]A4 6�—ht�?f�tE-tl3�-mss 1tES t�tE 20-780--- -
008263 MCLEOD USA, INC . 207131 06/ 1.2/02 669.77
004334 NORTHEASTER 20782 06/12/02 186. 15
0000 OF=FTOE-DEPOT 2t�783 �f12t0e: 27e`c�c
004345 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC 20784 06/12/02 53.28
004354 PAUSTIS & SONS 20785 06/12/02 2,849 .83
O0ka55 -PEPSI-eeEA--C:6MPAN 207f3-6rtY6-/-t2Ya2---- x:30:7-6---
004360 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 20787 06/1.2/02 5,666 .20
004361 PINNACLE DIST. 207OR 06/12/02 1 ,642.29
008770- PSRTE LA AM 67 m&O-
004376 PRIOR WINE CO 20790 06/12/02 4, 204. 15
004385 QUAI_I'TY WINE CO 20791 06/12/02 12,547 .23
OG82- g E,WEST DEX 20 '�2- t}6f-1-2f0 3 e 23-
008597 R.D. HANSON ASSOC . , INC . 20793 06/ 12/02 99.00
008701 REGISTER TAPE NETWORK 20794 06/12/02 500.00
0�c o 46�T�N3=O3•�--F f2 E3�JP 2 X95--Qb-t1.-t t0"F� --5,�-.�4.�--
008470 SUN NEWSPAPERS 20796 06/12/02 335. 00
004463 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO E0797 06/12/02 750.62
F}�}468 - TO-TL,1=REGISTER-SYSTEMS
008903 U.S. BANK 20799 06/ 12/02 20,737 .50
008507 US FOODSERVICE 20800 06/12/02 3.294. 1'
0& 4?& 'VAL-Pj4K-0E--MTNNESGTA - 2r}get-}, -/-%ctCr_ -- ----1-.625- 00 --
004494 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN 20802 06/12/02 327.43
008316 WINE COMPANY/TIRE 20803 06/12/02 293. 0-11.
004499 WORLD CLASS WINES, INC . 20805 06/ 12/02 277 .00
-i
15
�-t•��-a z 1�rF�ltir �-A 1=-�-��-E.lw-- - -- -- :sr-=A rtr-r"�ru�rY-v 1�.cF-�c
o6/C)5/2C)02 08 C.hec l Register GL.540R--•VC)E ' -O. '.NAGE.
-}44Pi4 Vi^i\ti7E7ft ( i*A C�K#k t)A- E,
L...IOR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
00,9880 BRErM R DANK..,NA 20094 05/31/02 .8,0.00 o 00 --
008800 EIREll E7 BANK :NA,
20095 C)5/
3 1/02
15, bob.OC)
----�(J U'a�-0 /L3-1�' -
004250 LlJNDGREN/I"IATTHE.W H. 20097 05/31/02 180.00
008137 MURPHY 'Ci SERVICE CENTEE-1 20098 05/31/02 200.00
C)0-A.-�2-9- I=-F4i;t F.01\1fIv1-1EEL H AA G�0 --
99 6 39
0028/r C) PE RA 201 00 05/ 3 1.-/C?2. 1 6�32
0OC980 ) IC+RF IIIER :BAr\IK .I\IA
22601 .0`1/;3 i./C.)i? i.0,000.OO
ea�o�=------�Rr=-�r-E�--r�A�r�(-1�-`
008716 SC:ENE/"f'E•9E. 22603 05/31/02 1.30.00
00,4250 L U1\11)GRE1\1/IviATTHE=W 1-1. 22604 05/31/02 180. 00
008770. PORTE:R/WIL L J AM 22606 05/3l/b 2 C) 6 7 w 00
008800 ]EIREMER BAN -NF1 607 :05/31/02 10,C)OO W 00
--
008716 SC:EI\IE:/T'HE=. 22609 05/31-/02 1.30.00
004250 LUNDG-RE_N/MF-)T'TE-4EW H. 22 610 05/31 /02 180.00
-0C}2680 X CE-f hif-RC# -- c ?6 r1 J-CAS rr7'-----
008526 SUNRISE F)ARK;: I1\IU.: AGErI�ICY, 2261,26 1,2 6 5/3 J.:/ 5>,416.2`i .'
00GE300 BRE:MER . l`iF1NE( .NA 2263.'3 ,05/31/02 10, 000.00
— U�}3E3C�E} 2REi IFR- F'ri`;IfF 1�fF1 ---- 2-261-zt.-051,?-7./-0r :L'y y()OLD-(7()----
008716 SC:E:NE/TFIE 22615 05/31/02 130.'00
004250 L.UI\IE)C-3R[E1\1/11A'TTHE:W H. 2261.6 05/31/02 1130.00
f-f]
008Fi00 EIRE"IER IIF-lNK-NIA 2261 b. 0�3/3J./Or '10,000eOQ
o0E3800 IE+REP1ER EiF1nIE( NA 22619 C)5/31./02
15, 000.00
1-3i}-.OE)-004250 LUi�IOC;f�EN/I"IF11 f FIE.W H. 22621 05/31/02 180.00
-- L-I C?�-J�1+7--(.:HE::(3-K�F�fG-A C C-:f::}�J C`I=F- . . — — — • ----- ----1�-6,�i��i�8 a-O�---�t••a-•�
16
RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 051
A resolution relating to local government information systems;
authorizing the execution and delivery of second amendment to
the joint and cooperative agreement
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
(City)as follows:
Section 1. Background; findings.
1.01. The City is a party to the joint and cooperative agreement (Agreement) establishing
an organization known as Local Government Information System (LOGIS). The Agreement is
originally dated May 1, 1972, and has been amended by Amendment No. 1, adopted May 3, 1993.
1.02. In 1988, LOGIS established the LOGIS Health Care Group (Plan) to enable
members of LOGIS to participate mi a program of cooperatively providing group health, life, .
accident and other insurance and personnel benefits for the officers and employees of the members
of the Plan and LOGIS itself. LOGIS has continuously operated and administered the Plan since its
inception.
1.03. The Board of Directors of LOGIS has been advised by legal counsel that it is
necessary and desirable that the Agreement be amended to clearly authorize the Plan and the
participation in the Plan by members of LOGIS.
1.04. There has been presented to this Council a form of Amendment No.2 to the
Agreement (Amendment). The Amendment is on file with the City Clerk, and is attached as
Exhibit A.
1.05. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of the City that the
Agreement be amended as proposed in the Amendment.
DJK-209993v1
LG100-16
1
II7
Sec. 2. Approval and Authorization: Ratification.
2.01. The form of the Amendment-is approved.
2.02. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to deliver the Amendment in the manner
provided for in the Agreement.
2.03. All actions, if any, of the City, the City Council, and the officers and employees of
the City in participating in the Plan, are ratified and confirmed.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated: S2002.
DJK-209993vl
LG 100-16
2
18
EXIMEBIT A
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS,
Originally Dated May 1, 1972,
As amended By Amendment No. 1,Adopted May 3, 1993
Section 1. Article I, General Purpose,of the Joint and Cooperative Agreement, Local
Government Information Systems, as amended,(Agreement)is amended to read as follows:
1. GENERAL PURPOSE
The general purpose of this agreement is to provide for an organization through which the
parties may jointly and cooperatively provide for Q the establishment, operation and maintenance
of data processing facilities and management information systems for the use and benefit of the
parties and others and(ii)group health,life, accident, and other insurance and personnel benefits for
the officers and employees of the parties and the organization.
Sec. 2. The terms of this amendment are effective as of April 1, 2002. This amendment is
effective on the date of its execution and delivery by all of the members of the organization in
accordance with the Agreement.
DJK-209993vl
L.G100-16
A-1
19
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 4, 2002
TO: Mike Momson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: LOGIS HEALTH INSURANCE/AMENDMENT
The City of St. Anthony provides health and life insurance benefits to its employees
through LOGIS.
The LOGIS Group is a consortium of 46 Cities that negotiates and administers a plan of
benefits. The agreement allows LOGIS members to participate in cooperatively
providing group health, life, and accident insurance and personnel benefits for its
employees.
By joining with other municipalities and local governments, St. Anthony is able to
negotiate premiums at lower rates.
The Board of Directors (8 members comprised of representatives from member Cities)
has requested that Cities amend the agreement.to clarify LOGIS' authority to conduct and
administer the plan.
Recommendation:
Council approve resolution#02-051 authorizing the amendment to the LOGIS joint
and cooperative agreement.
20
L GIS
Local Government Information Systems Association
The LOGIS Advantage Health Care Group
Stanton Group, Suite 100, 3405 Annapolis Lane, Plymouth, MN 55447
Voice:(763) 278-4462 • Far (763) 278-4005 •Internet: http://lvww.yjohnson @,vtanton-group.cotn
May 22,2002
Ms. Connie Kroeplin
City Clerk
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St.Anthony MN 55418
Dear Connie:
Enclosed is a proposed Amendment No. 2 to the LOGIS Joint Powers Agreement, together with a sample
resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of the Amendment. (The sample resolution will have to be
modified appropriately by each member).
As stated in the sample Resolution, LOGIS has, since 1988, been administering a group health and medical
insurance plan(Plan) for those members who have chosen to participate. LOGIS' legal counsel has advised
the Board of Directors that the Agreement should be modified as proposed by the Amendment to clarify
LOGIS' authority to conduct and administer the Plan. The amendment also provides that other types of
group benefits may be included in the Plan. The resolution also ratifies the participation in the Plan by
members of the Plan.
It is necessary for all members, including those governmental units that have not participated in the Plan, to
approve the Amendment. The Joint Powers Agreement can be amended only by a unanimous action of the
members. Once you have adopted the Resolution,please mail a certified copy with the Amendment attached
as Exhibit A to Yvonne Johnson, Stanton Group, 3405 Annapolis Lane N, Plymouth, MN 55447. We will
file the copy on your behalf with the City Manager of Brooklyn Center as provided in the original
Agreement.
In addition, a new LOGIS Group Health and Life Insurance Policies and Procedures document has been
included for your information. It has been revised to include early withdraw penalties should any member
leave the group without giving proper notification.
The Board will greatly appreciate your prompt attention to this matter.
If you have any questions about the Amendment, the Resolution or the Polices and Procedures document,
please feel free to contact either Ms. Yvonne Johnson, Stanton Group,or Mike Gams, LOGIS.
(�a, baM��
By: By:
Dave Wertz Mike Gams
Chair,LOGIS Health Care Committee Executive Director,LOGIS
Enclosure
21
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 02 - 052
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A JOINT
COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR
PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM IN FY 2003 - 2005
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village,Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in
effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban
County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) and HOME Investment
Partnerships (HOME) Programs; and
WHEREAS, the City and County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in order
to continue to qualify as an Urban County for purposes of the Community
Development Block Grant and HOME Programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; that a new-Joint Cooperation Agreement between the
City and County be executed effective October 1, 2002 and that the Mayor and the City Manager
be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted this day of , 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
Y' Hennepin County Department of Transit&Community Works
N 417 North Fifth Street,Suite 320 612-348-9260,Phone
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401-1362 612-348-9710,Fax
-�: www.co.hennepin.mn.us
May 22, 2002
Mr. Michael Morrison
Manager
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony,MN 55418
Subject: Fiscal Year 2003-2005 Joint Cooperation Agreement
Dear Mr. Mornson:
Accompanying for your review and execution is the Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation
Agreement for FY 2003 —2005. The agreement sets forth broad shared powers for carrying out
housing and community development activities. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development(HUD)requires the agreement in order for Hennepin County to qualify as an
urban county and receive Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) and HOME
Investment Partnership Program (HOME) entitlement funds.
A draft gray-line copy of the agreement is enclosed,which details all revisions to the current
agreement. There are several significant changes. The first deals with the need for"timely"
expenditure of funds. This relates to the HUD requirement that unexpended CDBG funds
cannot total more than 1.5 times the last grant allocation. The hard work of municipal and
county staff to meet this expenditure goal have proven successful, but it is felt advisable to
provide additional flexibility to address this problem and to avoid financial penalty in the future.
One of these changes reduces the time for implementing activities from 24 months to 18 months.
Another change is to increase the county administrative fee from 10 to 13 percent of the grant
total to offset increasing county property tax expenditures for this purpose. Additionally,this
administrative fee will include a set aside for countywide fair housing efforts.
As a community participating in the Urban Hennepin County Program, your city would not be
eligible in FY 2000—2002 to apply for grants under the small cities or state CDBG programs.
Your community will automatically participate in the Hennepin County HOME Program and
will not be eligible to receive HOME funds through the state or other consortiums.
Your city is considered a split place by HUD,because a portion of the city's population is
outside of Hennepin County. By executing this agreement the entire city population will be
included in the Urban County Program.
An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper
23
May 22, 2002
Mr. Michael Morrison
Page 2
Please execute the city signature page of agreement to indicate your continued participation in
the Urban County. Program. Return only an original copy of the city signature page with the
city seal and a copy of the authorizing resolution by June 30,2002: A sample council
resolution is enclosed. A completed county signature page will be sent to you after execution by
the county.
Materials should be sent to:
Steve Cramer
Housing, Community Works and Transit
417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401-1362
Please contact Jim Ford at 612/348-6013 if you have any questions about the agreement or
process. I look forward to continuing our cooperative efforts in addressing suburban Hennepin
County housing and community development needs.
I-- y
Era r
Director
Enclosures: Cooperation Agreement
Draft gray line agreement
Sample Resolution
cc: Sue Henry
;1
24
Contract No. A04232
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of
Minnesota,hereinafter referred to as"COUNTY,"A-2400 Government Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota,55487,and
the cities executing this Master Agreement,each hereinafter respectively referred to as "COOPERATING UNIT,"
said parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of Minnesota, and made pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59:
WITNESSETH:
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens that
COOPERATING UNIT shares its authority to carry out essential community development and housing activities
with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY to secure and administer Community Development Block Grant and
HOME Investment Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as herein defined and,
therefore,in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement,the parties mutually
agree to the following terms and conditions.
COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that it:
1. May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for fiscal
years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program; and
2. May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County.
I. DEFINITIONS
The definitions contained in 42 USC 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR§570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated
herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them:
A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act_ of 1974, as amended, (42
U.S.C. 5301 et seq.).
B. 'Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not
limited to 24 CFR Part 570.
C. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
D. "Cooperating Unit" means any city or town in Hennepin County that has entered into a cooperation
agreement that is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County,.which is a party to each
Agreement.
E. "Consolidated Plan" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or
documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is
i
developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the Community
Development Block Grant Program.
F. "Metropolitan City"means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is certified
by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people.
II. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to
undertake,or assist in undertaking,community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities,specifically
urban renewal and publicly assisted housing and authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities
for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will
be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant and HOME appropriations for the Federal Fiscal
Years 2003,2004 and 2005 and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds.
III. AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1,2002 and terminating no sooner than
the end of the program year covered by the Consolidated Plan for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal Year 2005,as
authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds granted to the
County for such period. COUNTY may notify COOPERATING UNIT prior to the end of the Urban County
qualification period that the Agreement will automatically be renewed unless it is terminated in writing by either
party. Either COUNTY or COOPERATING UNIT may exercise the option to terminate the Agreement at the end of
the Urban County qualification-period. If COUNTY or COOPERATING UNIT fail to exercise that option,it will
not have the opportunity to exercise that option until the end of a subsequent Urban County qualification period.
COUNTY will notify the COOPERATING UNIT in writing of its right to elect to be excluded by the date specified
by HUD.
This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any changes necessary to
meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice applicable for
the year in which the next qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either party to adopt such an
amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the expenditure of all CDBG
and HOME funds allocated for use in COOPERATING UNIT's jurisdiction.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,this Agreement may be terminated at the end of the
program period during which HUD withdraws its designation of COUNTY as an Urban County under the Act.
This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY
pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies,and a copy of the authorizing resolution and
executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the Hennepin County Department of
Housing, Community Works and Transit, and in no event shall the Agreement be filed later than June 30, 2002.
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the
applicant's certifications required by Section 104(b)of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974,as amended,including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;the Fair Housing Act,Section 109 of Title I
of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and other applicable laws.
2
. 26
IV. ACTIVITIES
COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out,within the
terms of this Agreement,certain projects involving one or more of the essential activities eligible for funding under
the Act. COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by
providing the services specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable
requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes or regulations in
the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate COUNTY's
responsibility to assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act,including the development of the Consolidated
Plan,pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91.
COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COOPERATING UNIT will,in accord with a COUNTY-established schedule,prepare and provide to
COUNTY,in a prescribed form, requests for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds
consistent with this Agreement,program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated
Plan.
B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that,pursuant to 24 CFR§570.501 (b),it is subject to the same
requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient
Agreement set forth in 24 CFR§570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the implementation
requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly executed with and
in a form prescribed by COUNTY.
C. COOPERATING UNIT.acknowledges that it is subject to the.same subrecipient requirements stated
in paragraph B above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an activity pursuant
to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances, a written Third Party
Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING UNIT in a form
prescribed by COUNTY.
D. COOPERATING UNIT shall implement all activities funded for each annual program pursuant to this
Agreement within eighteen (18) months of the authorization by HUD to expend the basic grant
amount.
1. Funds for all activities not implemented within eighteen (18) months shall be transferred to a
separate account for reallocation on a competitive request for proposal basis.
2. Limited extensions to the implementation period may be granted upon request only in cases
where the authorized activity has-been initiated and/or subject of a binding contract to proceed.
3. If COUNTY is notified by HUD that it has not met the performance standard for the timely
expenditure of funds at 24 CFR 570.902(a) and the COUNTY.entitlement grant is reduced by
HUD, according to its policy on corrective actions, then the basic grant amount to any
COOPERATING UNIT that has not met its expenditure goal shall be reduced in a manner
proportionate to the reduction in the COUNTY grant.
E. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to assist in accomplishing the community
development program and housing goals,as contained in the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated
Plan.
3
27
F. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all programs and/or activities funded,in part or in full by
grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement,shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair
housing,employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall,in implementing
all programs and/or activities funded by the basic grant amount, comply with all applicable Federal
and Minnesota Laws,statutes,rules and regulations with regard to civil rights,affirmative action-and
equal employment-opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY.
G. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or
that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be prohibited from
receiving CDBG funding for any activities.
H. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process, as established by
COUNTY,in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974, as amended.
I. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY for any expenditure determined by HUD or
COUNTY to be ineligible.
J. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the
interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY.
K. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or
exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations within its jurisdiction.
COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies,on an annual basis,
all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount under the
Act.
B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating
services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of a request for funding.
C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY in
fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program and
housing goals.
D. COUNTY shall,upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer local housing
rehabilitation grant programs funded pursuant to the Agreement,provided that COUNTY shall receive
Twelve percent(12%)of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as reimbursement
for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity.
4
28
E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to
administer,for a possible fee,other programs and/or activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on
behalf of COOPERATING UNIT.
F. COUNTY may,as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration,develop and
implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act,Regulations,HUD administrative directives,.
and administrative requirements of COUNTY.
V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS
Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as follows:
A. . COUNTY shall retain thirteen percent(13%)of the annual basic grant amount for the administration of
the program. Included in this administrative amount is funding for annual county-wide Fair Housing
activities.
B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be made available by COUNTY to COOPERATING
UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C and the procedure stated in part D of this
section for the purpose of allowing the COOPERATING UNITS to submit funding requests. The
allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding.
C. The COUNTY will calculate,for each COOPERATING UNIT,an amount that bears the same ratio to
the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between:
1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING UNITS.
2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all
COOPERATING UNITS.
3. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of
overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS.
4. In determining the average of the above ratios,the ratio involving the extent of poverty shall be
counted twice.
D. Funds will be made available to communities utilizing the formula specified in C of this Section in the
following manner:
1. COOPERATING UNIT qualifying as a Metropolitan City (having populations of at least
50,000)will receive annual funding allocations equal to the HUD formula entitlement or the
COUNTY formula allocation,whichever is greater.
2. Other COOPERATING UNITS with COUNTY formula allocations of$75,000 or more will
receive funding allocations in accordance with the formula allocations.
3. COOPERATING UNITS with COUNTY formula allocations of less than$75,000 will have
their funds consolidated in a pool for award in a manner determined by COUNTY. Only the
COOPERATING UNITS,whose funding has been pooled,will be eligible to compete for these
funds.
5
29
.. E. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY
assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data
furnished by HUD.
F. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request a funding allocation, or a portion thereof,the
amount not requested shall be made available to other,participating communities, in a manner
determined by COUNTY.
VI. METROPOLITAN CITIES
Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of Urban
Hennepin County.
This agreement can be voided if the COOPERATING UNIT is advised by HUD,prior to the completion of the re-
qualification process for fiscal years 2003-2005, that it is eligible to become a metropolitan city and the
COOPERATING UNIT elects to take its entitlement status. If the agreement is not voided on the basis of the
COOPERATING UNIT's eligibility as a metropolitan city prior to July 13,2002,the COOPERATING UNIT must
remain a part of the COUNTY program for the entire three-year period of the COUNTY qualification.
VII. OPINION OF COUNSEL
The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement, hereby
opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that the
COOPERATING UNIT has full legal authority to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community
development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly-assisted housing.
Assistant County Attorney
6
30
VIII. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on ,
2002, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement,the COUNTY
agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA
By:
Chair of its County Board
And:
Assistant/Deputy/County Administrator
Attest:
Deputy/Clerk of the County Board
And:
Assistant County Administrator,Public Works and County
Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Assistant County Attorney Director,Housing, Community Works and Transit
Department
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION:
Assistant County Attorney
Date:
31
IX. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION
COOPERATING UNIT,having signed this Agreement,and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing body having
duly approved this Agreement on , 2002, and pursuant to such approval and the proper city official
having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Joint
Cooperation Agreement, contract A
CITY OF
By:
Its Mayor
And:
Its City Manager
ATTEST:
CITY MUST CHECK ONE:
The City is organized pursuant to:
Plan A . Plan B Charter
May 20,2002
8
32
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 02 - 053
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
RELATING TO A POLICE TACTICAL TEAM WITH THE CITY
ROSEVILLE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
WHEREAS, the City Council of St. Anthony Village recognizes the current need for increased
police protection and law enforcement services; and
WHEREAS, THE City Council of St. Anthony Village finds it is in their common interests and
benefits of their Cities citizens to enter into an Agreement with the City of
Roseville concerning staffing and activities of a Police Tactical Team within their
respective jurisdictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
Village hereby approves the Joint Powers Agreement to Provide for a Police Tactical Team
Between the City of Roseville and the City of St. Anthony Village and authorizes the Mayor and
City Manager to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of St. Anthony Village.
Adopted this day of , 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
33
MEMO
DATE: June 3, 2002
TO: Mike Morrison
FROM: Dick Engstrom
SUBJECT: Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Roseville Police Department
In today's fast paced world, law enforcement has to keep in step with the changes on how
we protect the community. There is plenty of what's going on in cities across the nation,
school shootings, domestic terrorism, armed standoffs with police, work place shootings,
to bear out our concerns.
I recommend the Council sign this "Joint Powers Agreement" that will be a plus for the
citizens of our community by enabling us to respond quickly in any critical incident that
requires specialized training to deal with it.
Roseville Police Department has ten officers committed to this operation, and we have
three. Thus far, Roseville has most of the technology and equipment to carry out these
operations. We have used Hennepin County and Minneapolis Swat forces in the past.
While they have provided good service, the wait has been too long—up to three hours to
get a briefing and to get fully deployed for the operation. Last summer, it took almost
five hours. In today's society, that is not acceptable.
34
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
TO PROVIDE FOR A POLICE TACTICAL TEAM BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AND THE CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into by and between the CITY OF ROSEVILLE,a
Minnesota municipal corporation, and the CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, is effective upon the execution of this Agreement by
the named officers of both cities.
WHEREAS, the Cities provide police protection and law enforcement services
within their respective jurisdictional boundaries, and;
WHEREAS, the Cities desire to maximize the level of police protection and law
enforcement services provided within their respective jurisdictions, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville Police Department currently staffs and equips a
Tactical Team to provide specialized police services in emergency and non-emergency
situations, and;
WHEREAS, the Cities have previously entered into a joint powers agreement
dated November 15, 1968 to furnish assistance to each other on request in the form of
personnel, equipment and supplies in the event of an emergency in the participating
jurisdictions, and;.
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 authorizes political subdivisions
of the State to enter into agreements for the joint and cooperative exercise of common
powers, including those which are the same except for the territorial limits within which
they may be exercised, and:
WHEREAS, the Cities desire to enter into an agreement to extend Roseville
Police Department Tactical Team services throughout the jurisdiction of the participating
Cities, and membership in the Team by peace officers of St. Anthony, and;
WHEREAS, the Cities find it in their common interest and benefit and in the
interest and benefit of their citizens to enter into an agreement, one with the other,
concerning staffing and activities of a Tactical Team within their respective jurisdictions,
as supplementary to the preexisting joint powers agreement.
35
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Cities hereby,by act of their
City Councils, enter into this supplementary Joint Powers Agreement to furnish
assistance to each other upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, as follows:
1. Each city may authorize its officers to seek membership on the Tactical Team
under the application procedures and requirements specified by the Roseville
Police Department, and the cities shall cooperatively budget for and equip
their respective team member participants.
2. All training and equipment requirements, and command and operational
protocols, shall be established by the Roseville Police Department.
3. Each Cities' Police Chief or designee may request the services of the Tactical
Team.
4. All activities of the Tactical Team shall be under the direction of the Team
Leader. Each City shall continue to be responsible for its own personnel,
equipment, and for injuries or death to any such personnel or damage to any
such equipment. Each City's personnel shall be deemed to be performing their
regular duties for the City. Insurance coverage and any financial
compensation shall be the responsibility of each party for its own personnel
and equipment. Each party waives the right to sue the other party for any
worker's compensation benefits paid to its own employee or-volunteer even if
the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other
party, its officers, employees, or volunteers.
5. No charge shall be made to either party for assistance rendered under this
Agreement. Provided, however, that in the event the City that is requesting
assistance under this Agreement is reimbursed for said personnel, equipment,
or any other costs, from a party or parties responsible for the emergency, or
otherwise reimbursed by a third party source, then reimbursement, on a pro-
rata basis, shall be made to the responding party for any equipment or
personnel charges. Proper written documentation of expenses must
accompany a request for reimbursement.
6. The Cities agree to indemnify and defend one another against claims brought
or actions filed against one of the participants to this Agreement or any
officers, employees, or volunteers thereof, for injury or death to any third
person or persons, or damage to the property of third persons, arising out of
the performance of services under this Agreement.
7. The duty to indemnify and defend under this Agreement shall rest with the
City where the incident giving rise to the.duty to indemnify and defend
occurs. The duty to defend and indemnify under this Agreement is subject to
the liability limits under Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes. The purpose of
creating these reciprocal duties to defend and indemnify is to simplify the
36
defense of liability claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to
permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to
be defended by a single attorney.
Under no circumstances, however, shall either City be required to pay, on
behalf of itself and another participant to this Agreement any amounts in
excess of liability limits established in Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes,
applicable to only one Party. The limits of liability for each City may not be
added together to increase the maximum statutory liability limits to any Party.
Each City shall satisfy themselves that they have adequate insurance to cover
any claims brought under this Agreement and that the activities and
responsibilities set forth herein are covered under the provisions of their
respective insurance policies. To the extent the activities are not currently
covered, each City shall obtain appropriate insurance coverage
8. Either City may terminate its participation by providing sixty days written
notice to the other participant.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Cities of Roseville and Saint Anthony Village have
caused this Agreement to be duly executed effective on the day and year last entered
below.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Dated: By:
John Kysylyczyn
Its Mayor
By:
Neal J. Beets
Its City Manager
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
Dated: By:
Randy Hodson
Its Mayor
37
By:
Michael Mornson
Its City Manager
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
1380 Corporate Center Curve
317 Eagandale Office Center
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (651)452-5000
JJJ:cjh
38.
MEMO
DATE: June 3, 2002
TO: Mike Morrison
FROM: Dick Engstrom
SUBJECT: Parking Options
On April 23, 2002, we sent a letter accompanied by options for parking around the high
school on Rankin, 32nd, 33rd, Skycroft Drive, Hilldale, and Townview. These letters were
sent to 78 neighbors in that immediate area. We have received 28 responses by return of
the options questionnaire. Four respondents called the police department.
• Eight respondents liked Option#1 of signage"No Parking During School Hours,
Monday Thru Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.
Fourteen respondents chose Option#2 of signage"No Parking on One Side of the
Street, Monday Thru Friday During School 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.
• Three.respondents chose Option#3 —do nothing, but inform the students to park
on one side, 20 feet from the cross walk, and 30 feet from stop signs. Also inform
them not to block private driveways (would require some signage).
• One respondent chose Options#1, #2, #3,  (other)
• One respondent chose Options#1, #2, #3
• Two respondents chose Options#1, #2, (other)
• Three respondents chose Options#3
#4 Option ranged from school should let them use the lot without paying for it; let
the kids walk, let the kids ride bikes, let the bus drop them off and pick them up.
• Other comments, under#4, were worried about getting in and out of driveways,
garbage pickup, snow plows, emergency vehicles getting through in the winter,
and a place for workers on private homes to park.
The Police Department concurs with the majority, and would recommend Option#2,
along with signage for stop signs and crosswalks.
Please see attached options.
PARKING OPTIONS AND SOLUTIONS FOR RANKIN ROAD and 33'd AVE. 39
1.. Signage—No Parking During School Hours, Monday thru Friday, 7:00 a.m. to
3:00 p.m.
YES NO
2. Signage—No Parking on One Side of the Street, Monday thru Friday, 7:00 a.m. to
3:00 p.m.
YES NO
3. Do nothing at all, but inform students to park on one side of the street or twenty
feet from the crosswalk —thirty feet from stop sign, and not to block access to
private driveways.
YES NO
4. OTHER(Your comments/suggestions)
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY-QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT ON 2002 GOALS
June 11, 2002
Goal Progress Target Completion Implementation Problems (if applicable)
Date or Comments
1.Redevelop Apache Center Area Redevelopment agreement signed; 10/05
Property meetings held every 2 weeks with
developer.
2.Develop Public Facilities Plan Kraus Anderson presented Construction 4/03 Facilities more likely 4/04.
Management concept on April 1 to
Council.
a• Public Works Facility Communication plan adopted May 28. 2/03 4/04 is more likely than 2/03.
b• SAV#1 Still working on preliminary information 12/02 Stonehouse issue likely to determine new store. 12/02 not
before consultants are selected. realistic.
C. Stonehouse Jim Demoricki hired to work with 1/03 Resolution passed on liquor license referendum 5/28.
charitable gambling board,90 to 120
days.
d• Fire Station Communication plan proposed 5/28. 2/03 4/04 more likely than 2/03.
3.Maintain legislative presence on Success based on bonding,wine and 6/03 Goal successfully completed.
critical St.Anthony issues grocery defeated,no LGA reductions.
4.Develop plan for long term financial Last workshop with Ehlers for August. 6/02 6/02 will be 8/15/02.
needs
5.Enhance community involvement in 1.Updated WEB page. 12/02 On-going
critical city issues 2.Installed improvements to cable access
channel.
3.Fire and liquor departments
develop customer service feedback cards.
4.Mayor's Coffee Hours.
June 4, 2002
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date Meeting Type Staff Present Items/Issues
June 25 Regular Planning Commission report from 6/18 meeting
* Culver's project
-CUP
-Lot combination
-Parking variance
-Setback variance
-Other
*Possible sign variance
*Gross floor area ordinance amendment
*Ordinance amendment deleting candle
manufacturing as a CUP
HRA Res., to approve inspection report for Exhaust Pros
&Hardees properties to be eligible for TIF
certification
HRA J. Gilligan Res., Development agreement with Culvers
July 9 Regular
July 23 Regular
July 30 Special Joint meeting with ISD#282
August 5 Work Session Department Budget meeting
Heads
August 12 Regular
August 26 Regular
April -2002 City of St. Anthony
Profit&Loss Statement from Operations
Actual Actual
Year to Date Year to Date Increase
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE 04/30/02 04/30/01 (Decrease)
Sales $158,481.00 $167,890.00 $69,862.00 $1,507,535.00 $1,435,886.00 $71,649.00
Less:Cost of Goods Sold $123,487.00 $131,452.00 $22,268.00 $1,066,360.00 $1,026,386.00 $39,974.00
Gross Profit $34,994.00 $36,438.00 $47,594.00 $441,175.00 $409,500.00 $31,675.00
Ratio to Net Sales 22.08% 21.70% 68.13% 29.26% 28.52%
Operating Expense:
Salaries, Wages, Benefits $16,013.00 $16,665.00 $25,636.00 $220,214.00 $202,915.00 $17,299.00
All Other Expenses $11,634.00 $13,377.00 $15,145.00 $151,690.00 $167,533.00 ($15,843.00)
Total Operating Expense $27,647.00 $30,042.00 $40,781.00 $371,904.00 $370,448.00 $1,456.00
Ratio to Net Sales 17.44% 17.89% 58.37% 24.67% 25.80%
Profit from Operations $7,347.00 $6,396.00 $6,813.00 $69,271.00 $39,052.00 $30,219.00
Other Income ($6.00) $115.00 $4,119.00 $17,460.00 $19,750.00 ($2,290.00)
Net Income $7,341.00 $6,511.00 $10,932.00 $86,731.00 $58,802.00 $27,929.00
Ratio to Net Sales 4.63% 3.88% 15.65% 5.75% 4.10%
April-Net Income $24,784.00
Y-T-D
SAV I SAV II STONEHOUSE ALL STORES
YEAR TO DATE 04/30/02 $29,402.00 $26,042.00 $31,287.00 $86,731.00
YEAR TO DATE 04/30/01 $15,118.00 $17,753.00 $25,931.00 $58,802.00
INCREASE/DECREASE $14,284.00 $8,289.00 $5,356.00 $27,929.00
April - 2002 City of St. Anthony
Reconciliation to Inventory Valuation Report
SAV I SAV II
Beginning Inventory. $218,040.92 Beginning Inventory: $235,317.76
Plus or Minus: Plus or Minus:
Transfers: SAV 1 $1,343.20 Transfers ($1,343.20)
Stonehouse ($7,092.98) Adjustments ($58.17)
Adjustments ($267.19) Returns to Vendors ($2,866.14)
Returns to Vendors ($2,619.19)
Add: Receiving $126,423.56
Add: Receiving $134,240.12
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($131,394.11)
Less: Cost of Goods Sold ($123,219.39)
TOTAL $226,079.70
TOTAL $220,425.49
Total per Valuation Report $226,227.43
Total per Valuation Report $220,132.82
Difference $147.73
Difference ($292.67)
Beginning April 2002 Inventory $220,132.82 Beginning April 2002 Inventory $226,227.43
***Comes from Valuation Report ***Comes from Valuation Report
2001 Actual Profits (Audited) 2002 Y-T-D Profits
Actual Y-T-D
SAV 1 SAV II Stonehouse SAV I SAV II Stonehouse Profits Comparison
January ($1,369.00) $1,857.00 ($1,701.00) ($1,213.00) January $5,583.00 $2,817.00 $3,554.00 $11,954.00 $13,167.00
February $1,620.00 $4,474.00 $9,410.00 $14,291.00 February $6,023.00 $6,005.00 $9,656.00 $33,638.00 $19,347.00
March $9,236.00 $7,127.00 $7,510.00 $38,164.00 March $10,455.00 $10,709.00 $7,145.00 $61,947.00 $23,783.00
April $5,631.00 $4,295.00 $10,712.00 $58,802.00 April $7,341.00 $6,511.00 $10,932.00 $86,731.00 $27,929.00
May $5,705.00 $6,957.00 $1,372.00 $72,836.00 May $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
June $16,325.00 $14,485.00 $2,734.00 $106,380.00 June $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
July $9,392.00 $12,077.00 $3,712.00 $131,561.00 July $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
August $3,986.00 $12,825.00 $3,261.00 $151,633.00 August $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
September $12,586.00 $14,197.00 $4,417.00 $182,833.00 September $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
October $3,874.00 $11,687.00 $2,934.00 $201,328.00 October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
November $8,777.00 $16,109.00 $12,660.00 $238,874.00 November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
December $13,258.00 $27,618.00 $3,515.00 $283,265.00 December $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,731.00
Total $89,021.00 $133,708.00 $60,536.00 $283,265.00 Total $29,402.00 $26,042.00 $31,287.00 $86,731.00
Increase/(Decrease) $14,284.00 $8,289.00 $5,356.00 $27,929.00
Y-T-D By Store
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: 04/30/2002
Interest Date
BREMER-ST ANTHONY BANK B1@ Purchased Matur jty Book Value
INVESTMENT DEMAND-MONEY MARKET SAVINGS 2.00% 1 DAY LIQUIDITY(SWEEP) $119,370.95
4/M GENERAL
$433,000 STELLER FUNDING COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.65% 03/12/02 05/21/02 $431,636.05
•$580,000 THREE CROWN FUNDING COMM PAPER 1.75% 04116102 07/22102 $577,339.73
$1,400,000 FHLMC MEDIUM NOTE-ZERO COUPON 7.009/o 0809/01 08/27/31 $134,373.51
$1,143,349.29
41M ARMY-WATER FILTRATION
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.009/6 02/03/99 02/24/14 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00°/6 03103/99 03103/14 $200,000.00
$100,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.46% 05112/99 01/08/08 $100,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-COUPON 6.000/6 11/01/01 11/28/16 $200,000.00
$800,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 01/12/99 01/28119 $202,057.98
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 6.20% 01/12/99 01/28/19 $126,286.24
$500,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK-ZERO COUPON 8.12% 09/09/99 07/14/17 $48,312.00
$500,000 FMNA MEDIUM NOTE-ZERO COUPON 7.00°/6 06/12/99 03/23/18 $146,062.50
$1,225,000 FED HOME LONE BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00°/6 09/24/01 10/18/21 $309,401.28
$1,250,000 FED HOME LONE BANK-ZERO COUPON 7.00% 11/07/01 02/22/29 $191,662.50
$400,000 LIBERTY STREEET COMM PAPER PARKS 1.730% 03/15/02 06/10/02 $398,356.67
$438,000 LOCHART FUNDING COMM PAPER PARKS 1.75% 04/18/02 07/21102 $436,011.97
$2,458,151.14
DAIN RAUSCHER-GENERAL
GNMA POOL 4734 8.50% 02/01!75 01/15105 $170.25
GNMA POOL 6472 7.50% 07/01!75 07/15/05 $797.67
GNMA POOL 14376 7.50°/o 0301!77 03/15/07 $1,433.88
GNMA POOL 23364 9.00% 09/01/78 09/15(08 $663.02
GNMA POOL 23356 9.00% 11/01178 11/15(08 $1,590.36
$670,000 FED HOME LOAN MTG-ZERO COUPON 7.150% 01/22102 02/22/29 $99,948.90
$250,000 HOUSEHOLD FINANCE COMM PAPER - PARKS 1.608% 01/18/02 05/15102 $248,723.00
$452,000 AMERICAN EXPRESS COMM PAPER 1.784% 02/22/02 06/19/02 $449,421.37
$557,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMM PAPER 1.958% 03/14/02 07/12102 $553,441.31
$1,356,189.76
DAIN RAUSCHER-HONEYWELL
$125,000 FHLBC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.041% 11/16199 07/14/17 $31,076.25
$100,000 FHLMC-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.00% 12/15/99 03/08/29 $10,105.00
$130,000 FNMA-ZERO COUPON BOND 8.30% 0601100 08/02118 .$29,555.30
$344,000 HOUSEHOLD FINANCE COMM PAPER - PARKS 1.634% 01/18/02 05/15/02 $342,212.76
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.00% 03/03/99 03103/14 $200,000.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-STEP UP 6.009/6 07/15/99 02/24/14 $194,180.00
$200,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.25% 6.25% 12118/01 12/27/16 $200,000.00
$95,000 FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP-6.00% 6.00% 12128/07 01/17/17 $95,000.00
$1,102,129.31
DEAN WITTER
i
$43,000.00 FICO FED STRIP SERIES 1 7.479% 11/09/94 05(11/02 $24,781.96
$500,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.00% 10/29/98 08(20(18 $128,730.00
$1,200,000.00 FED HOME LOAN BANK CALLABLE 6.009/6 10/21/98 09/10/18 $307,538.40
$550,000.00 FNMA-MEDIUM TERM NOTE 7.950% 11/24/99 06/22/18 $129,228.00
$680,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 7.106/6 06/15101 04/05/19 $97,722.56
$535,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 7.493% 07/09/01 02102(23 $109,514.50
$220,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 7.011% 07/19/01 08/20/18 $67,782.00
TimeS/1312002 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT APRIL 20021NVESTI
DEAN WI7TER (Continued)
$44,000.00 CONSECO BANK SALT LAKE-CID 2.47% 11/01/01 05101/02 $44,000.00
$95,000.00 WESTERN BANK -CID PARKS 2.45% 12126101 0612602 $95,000.00
$44,000.00 WESTERN PUERTO RICO-CID 2.05% 04116/02 10/24102 $44,000.00
$250,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-CALLABLE 6.31% _ 02/26/01 03/26(18 $248,750.00
$200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6.00°/6 11/14101 11/14/16 $200,000.00
$200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-SEMI 6.000/6 11/19/01 11/19/21 $197,000.00
$200,000.00 FHLMC MED TERM NOTE-STEP UP 6.500.6 12/28/01 12/15/16 $200,000.00
$1,894,047.42
DAIN RAUCHER-(HRA)
$200,000 FNMA-9334 P/O 7.24% 04120/93 03(25/23 $24,723.52
$200,000 GSIF FRMAC SER 1166.6% 7.00% 04/20/93 04120/08 $43,694.00
$100,000 FRMAC SER 11 MPRG 33.3 7.000/6 01/25/94 01/25/09 $21,730.00
$50,000 FHLMC MCB SER 1629MB 7.000/6 02/07/94 01/15/23 $30,636.11
$200,000-FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.000/6 04125/01 0204109 $250,000.00
$225,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.000/6 08!21/01 09/13/10 $225,000.00
$500,000-FHLB MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.11% 6.11% 09/26/01 09/26/11 $503,004.02
$250,000-FHLMC MEDIUM SERIES 3B/E 6.00% 6.00% 10/25101 10/15/16 $250,000.00
$100,000-FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6.00% 6.00% 11/14/01 1007/16 $100,000.00
$200,000-FHLMC MEDIUM TERM NOTE 6.00% 6.00% 11/16/01 11/29/21 $198,702.93
$300,000-AMERICAN EXPRESS COMMERCIAL PAPER 1.784% 04/05/02 07/10/02 $298,604.00
$300,000-FNMA MEDIUM TERM ZERO COUPON 7.20% 05(23101 05107/18 $99,562.70
$1,000,000-FED HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-ZERO COUPON 7.75% 12/27/01 12/27/21 $218.563"80
$2,264,221.08
TOTAL BOOK VALUE $10,337,458.95
Time5/13t2002 MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT APRIL 2002INVESTI
Central Park Improvement Project
Appropriation: $2,704,100.00
Hard Costs: 05/31/2002
Expenditures Balance
Central Park Construction-Veit $1,661,762.13 $339,338.98 $1,322,423.15
City Hall Irrigation $28,100.00 $0.00 $28,100.00
Park Building $453,096.90 $0.00 $453,096.90
Central Park-Contingency $34,000.00 $0.00 $34,000.00
Park Building Contingency $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
Total $2,201,959.03 $1,862,620.05
Silver Point Park
Building/Engineering
Soft Costs:
URS-Planning&Design $269,050.00 $187,235.00 $81,815.00 Budget Expenditures Balance
SEH-Engineering/Planning $55,000.00 $52,169.35 $2,830.65 $25,700.00 $25,700.00 $0.00
Total $324,050.00 $84,645.65
Additional Hard Costs:
Common Excavation $9,520.00 $0.00 $9,520.00
Common Borrow $36,988.00 $0.00 $36,988.00
Contaminated Soil/Disposal $25,153.58 $0.00 $25,153.58
Soccer Goal Posts $3,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00
Erosion Control Fence $4,674.25 $0.00 $4,674.25
Lab,Testing-Soils Analysis -$1,500.00 $0.00 $1,500.00
Environmental Field Supplies $295.00 $0.00 $295.00
Lead/Oil Drum Disposal $3,500.00 $0.00 $3,500.00
Additional Lighting Foundation $30,000.00 $0.00 $30,000.00
Practice Soccer Field $10.000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00
Total $124,630.83 $124,630.83
Additional Soft Costs:
STS Consultants-Soil Borings $6,646.00 $6,646.00 - $0.00
STS-Construction Testing $5,000.00 $2,520.00 $2,480.00
URS-Environmental Services $13,500.00 $0.00 $13,500.00
Bond Issuance $23,881.54 $30,786.54 ($6,905.00)
Pollution Control $2,362.50 $2,362.50 $0.00
Advertisement for Bids $390.10 $641.40 ($251.30)
Maurice Anderson $1,680.00 $1,680.0 0 0.00
Total $53,460.14 $8,823.70
Central Park Project-Totals $2,704,100.00 $623,379.77 $2,080,720.23
General Fund Budget to Actual Report: May 2002
Expenditures: Mean Average
42%
05/31/2002 Percentage Remaining
Budget Y-T-D Balance Spent Budget
Mayor/Council $56,300.00 $18,875.72 $37,424.28 34% 66%
Intergovernmental Relations $20,100.00 $9,839.90 $10,260.10 49% 51%
Cable Franchise $19,900.00 $2,759.16 $17,140.84 14% 86%
General Management $86,600.00 $43,057.21 $43,542.79 50% 50%
Elections $24,400.00 $5,263.33 $19,136.67 22% 78%
Finance/Insurance $208,200.00 $60,973.86 $147,226.14 29% 71%
Finance/Assessing $39,100.00 $958.55 $38,141.45 2% .98%
Legal $69,800.00 $28,019.93 $41,780.07 40% 60%
Engineering/Planning/Zoning $2,500.00 $621.95 $1,878.05 25% 75%
City Buildings $112,500.00 $23,835.27 $88,664.73 21% 79%
Civil Defense $43,700.00 $16,162.58 $27,537.42 37% 63%
Police Protection $1,061,200.00 $425,674.17 $635,525.83 40% 60%
Lauderdale/Falcon Heights $519,200.00 $208,713.57 $310,486.43 40% 60%
Fire Protection $555,900.00 $205,658.01 $350,241.99 37% .63%
Inspections/Building Permits $75,900.00 $23,219.47 $52,680.53 31% 69%
Animal Control $3,600.00 $1,030.28 $2,569.72 29% 71%
Public Works $395,200.00 $122,627.25 $272,572.75 31% 69%
Public Works/Maintenance& Repair $121,200.00 $39,946.73 $81,253.27 33% 67%
Tree and Weed Care $27,000.00 $9,737.66 $17,262.34 36% 64%
Parks $109,200.00 $47,852.10 $61,347.90 44% 56%
Transfers to other Funds $75,000.00 $31,250.00 $43,750.00 42% 58%
Budget Reserves/Non Budgeted $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0% 0%
Total Expenditures $3,626,500.00 $1,326,076.70 $2,300,423.30 37% 63%
Stormwater Fund - Cash on Band 05/31/2002
Projeted
Revenues: Funding Source Revenues-to-Date
Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000.00 $3,016,610.63
MSA Bonds $950,000.00 $935,008.45
DNR $4,000,000.00 $4,457,602.34
FEMA $700,000.00 $700,000.00
Hennepin County $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Storm Water Utility Charges $500,000.00 $509,645.42
Stone Sewer City Bonds $1.610.000.00 $1.594.271.55
Total Project Budget $9,610,000.00 $11,363,138.39
Other Project Activity:
Reserves/Transfer from Revolving Fund $175,000.00 $175,000.00
State of Minnesota-Reimbursements $0.00 $18,755.27
Homeowner Portion-Grant Agreement $0.00 $5,060.75
HRA-Streetscape Transfer $0.00 $155,100.00
Met Council $20,000.00 $10,000.00
Stormwater Fees-Purchase 2809-30th Avenue NE $106,000.00 $106,000.00
Interest Earnings(Non DNR Funds) $0.00 $126,495.42
Sale of Pahl Avenue Homes(2700 8 2704) $0.00 $11,200.00
29th Avenue-Water Connection Fees $26,000.00 $26,400.00
Misc.-Homeowner/Reimburse for Extra Construction Work $0.00 $38877.50
Total Revenues $9,937,000.00 $12,036,027.33
05/31/2002
Expenditures: Expenditures-to-Date
WS8-Engineering Services $378,396.72
Barr-Engineering Services $2,709.35
Dorsey 8 Whitney-Legal Services $36,911.64
Rice Creek Watershed District-Water Study $2,025.00
Purchase of Flood Homes $939,166.64
Pahl Avenue Ponding $110,938.57
Flood Relief Grant Program $65,159.32
Private Homes-Dumpsters/Service Master $17,371.44
Sump Pump $246.64
1999 Street Improvement Project $1,113,719.58
2000 Street Improvement Project $2,746,230.12
2001 Street Improvement Project $1,892,697.19
2002 Street Improvement Project $127,572.36
Harding Street Holding Ponds $895,634.63
Richard Knutson,Inc-Silver Point Park $1.552.170.21
Total Expenditures $9,880,949.41
Project Balance $2,155,077.92
Stormwater Fees Non-Desiganted $183,178.70
Total Cash on Hand $2,338,256.62
EXPENDITURE REPORT 05/31/1002
WSB: Flood Relief Grant Program: 2001 Street Improvement Project
Project Description: Expenditures Project Description: Exoenditures Project Description:
Water Resource Management Plan $12,191.50 Dennis/Penny Gault $10,000.00 WSB-Engineering Services $240,881.97
Water Management Plan $10,531.50 James/Susan Kozarek $10,000.00 Ulle Suburban Newspapers $38.75
Stonnwater Task Force $29,243.00 Thomas/Susan Hoban $800.00 Hage Concrete Works 52,358.53
Stonnwater Engineering 554,854.23 Julle Sexton. $1,004.53 Olson's Plumbing $221.90
Flood Problem Analysis $27,819.98 Village Properties-2801 37th Avenue NE 55,280.00 Sandness Construction $4,650.00
MCES Gram Application $1,724.25 Castle Building 8 Remodeling-3301 Edward St. $10,000.00 Bond Issuance $21,183.48
DNR/FEMA Grams $18,913.23 LN.Soiling-3460 Penrod lane $800.00 Park Construction 5?823 364 56
Sump Pump Inspection Program $5,083.43 J 8 D Landscaping-3460 Penrod Lane $1,300.00 Total 2001 Street Project $1,892,897.19
Park Design $158,447.10 St.Anthony Health Corner-3700 Foss Road $3,301.00
VI Study $31,201.50 RiteWay Waterproofing-2929 Crestview Avenue 5390.00 2002 Street Improvement Project
Flood Grant-1998/199920002001 530,587.00 Pine Cone Nursery-3460 Penrod Lane $9,222.80 Project Description:
Total WSB 5378,398.72 Lamers Concrete-Flood Proofing Improvement $4,412.00 WSB-Engineering Services 599,81725
McCaren Designs,Inc. $703.99 Dorsey 8 Whitney $5,220.89
Barr Engineering: Minnehaha Falls Landscaping $5,587.50 Construction Bulletin $215.16
Project Description: Elgard Excavating Company $1,245.00 Moody's Investors Service $3,250.00
District A8 Watershed Study 52.709.35 Twin Cities Glass Block $1.312.50 Springsted,Inc. $13,217.86
Total Barr Engineering $2,709.35 Total Flood Relief Program $65,159.32 Pipe Services Corp. 55.851.20
Total 2002 Street Project $127,572.36
Dorsey&Whitney: Private Homes-Dumpsters/Servlce Master
Project Description: Project Description:
Legal Services for Flooding Issues $17,911.16 Waste Management $391.65 Harding Street Holding Ponds
Legal Services-Comdenation of Homes $18,120.25 Service Master $13,78229 Project Description: Expenditures
Legal Services-Pahl Avenue $2.880.23 Nancy Myhran 5259.50 WSB-Engineering Services $105,888.05
Taal Dorsey 8 Whitney $36,911.64 Unda Gonter $198.00 Bettendorf Rohrer $30,075.00
Susan Kozarek $925.00 Second Nature Lawn $241,974.07
Water Quality Study: Elaine Nelson $1,065.00 Residential Easements $432,183.78
Silver Lake: Sue Wenker $250.00 Dorsey BWh"/Legal $31,400.27
Rice Creek Watershed District $2,025.00 Berkley RlskMsuanoe Claim-Payment $500.00 STS Consultants $3,235.00
Taal Dumpsters $17,371.44 Evergreen Land Services $19,519.86
Purchase of Homes: Construction Bulletn $358.48
Project Description: Sump Pump Albrecht,Inc. 520,215.22
Network Title.Inc. 5255.00 Project Description: Comdemnation Commissioners $8,455.10
Purchase of 2716 St.Anthony Boulevard $134,928.90 Mcleod USA-Sump Pump Une $131.00 Old Republic-Abstract Fees
Demolition $9,156.00 Lillie Suburban News-Advertisement $115.84 Taal Harding Street Holding Ponds $895,634.63
Taxes $839.61 Taal Sump Pump/Misc. $246.64
Legal Services-Dorsey 8 Whitney $225.00 Silver Point ParklConstructlon
Check for Asbestos-Abatement Services $365.00 1999 Street Improvement Project Project Description:
Seal 8 Cap Well $1,450.00 Project Description: Richard Knutson,Inc, $1,468,031.72
Purchase of 2713 St.Anthony Boulevard $147,676.13 WSB-Engineering Services $174,251.02 Sandness Construction 515,478.00
Demolition $11,258.00 Springsted,Inc.-Bond Services $8,835.85 Muska Electric $34,038.50
Legal Services-Attorney Fees for Seller $6,845.00 Northdale Construction $918,385.88 Construction Bulletin $160.89
Recording Deedrraxes $2,506.98 Treemendous $460.00 SEH,Inc-Silver Point Park Building $25,700.00
Title Insurance $946.00 Dorsey 8 Whitney $2,911.55 WSB,Inc-Silver Point Park Building $578.00
Seal 8 Cap Well $1,420.00 Bond Issuance Expense $10.875.28 Trillium Park 510.183.10
Purchase of 2809-30th Avenue NE $108,087.10 Taal 1999 Street Project $1,113,719.58 Taal Silver Point Park $1,552,170.21
Purchase of 2701 2704=Pahl Avenue $301,411.45
Purchase of 2713-Pahl Avenue 5208,072.00 2000 Street Improvement Project
First American Title $375.00 Project Description:
Evergreen Land Services 53.369.47 WSB-Engineering Services 5312,151.93
Total Purchase of Homes $939,166.64 Barbamssa 8 Sons,Inc. $2,199,371.31
E-CEL Energy $155,100.00
Pahl Avenue Ponding: Buchan Environmental Services $2,248.99
Project Description: Berkley Risk Services $10,000.00
WSB-Engineering Services $20,967.16 AIIState Insurance Company $312.78
G 8 L Construction $69,998.42 St.Paul Companies $16,884.96
Treemendous $14,460.90 Lillie Suburan Newspaper/Construction Bulletin 5232.93
Pipe Services $3,859.20 Albrecht,Inc. $891.75
Construction Bullilen $1,432.20 Fabyanske 8 Westra-Legal Cosuthigation $9,892.24
Ullie Suburban News-Advertisement $220.89 Bond Issuance Expense $39.143.23
Total Pahl Avenue Pondng $110,938.57 Total 2000 Street Project $2,746,230.12