HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 02201996 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
101457
Box: 20
Folder: PL PACKETS 1996
Document: PL PACKET 02201996
1
t
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
FEBRUARY 20, 1996
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER.
11. ROLL CALL.
III. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 20, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
IV. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 16 and JANUARY 30, 1996 PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES.
V. ST. ANTHONY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
a. Larry Hamer, Public Works Director
VI. MISCELLANEOUS UPDATE/REVIEW.
a. Review of Approved Conditional Uses
b. Goal Setting
VII.- STAFF 'UPDATE.
a. Replatting of Chandler Place Property
b. Variances for Chandler Place -- Summer Construction Plans
C. Review Village Properties Proposed Construction
d. EAW, Apache Plaza -- FYI
e. Telecommunications Seminar
VIII. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
- 1
l-
01 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
3 JANUARY 16, 1996
4 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
5 The meeting was called to order and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chair Bergstrom at 7:04
6 p.m.
7
8 H. ROLL CALL.
9 Commissioners present: Bergstrom, Makowske, Gondorchin, Delmonico, Thompson, and
10 Franzese.
11 Commissioners absent: Horst.
12 Also present: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant and Roger Larson, Finance
13 Director.
14 The Commission congratulated Commissioner Thompson on his re-appointment to the Planning
15 Commission.
16 The Commission welcomed Commissioner John Delmonico to the Planning Commission. Chair
17 Bergstrom asked Commissioner Delmonico to share his background with the Commission.
18 Commissioner Delmonico indicated he has been a homeowner in St. Anthony for several years,
19 residing at 2500-27th Avenue. Commissioner Delmonico noted he had been a volunteer for the
20 Fire Department from 1977 through 1988, and is currently in his 10th year with the Minneapolis
21 Police Department. Commissioner Delmonico continued that he considered an appointment with
22 the Commission three years ago, but his shift schedule would not allow it. Commissioner
23 Delmonico indicated he wanted to be a part of the Planning Commission because he liked St.
24 Anthony and felt he could make a difference.
25 III. SELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION.
26 Commissioner Thompson nominated Chair Bergstrom as Chair for 1996 Planning Commission.
27 Commissioner Makowske seconded the nomination.
28 Motion by Thompson, seconded by Makowske, to select Chair Bergstrom as Chair for 1996
29 Planning Commission.
30 Voting on the motion:
4k1 Aye: Makowske, Condorchin, Delmonico, Thompson, Franzese
32 Nay: None
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
0 Page 2
1 Abstention: Bergstrom
2 Motion carried.
3 Chair Bergstrom stated he is looking forward to 1996.
4 Commissioner Makowske nominated Commissioner Thompson as Vice Chair for the 1996
5 Planning Commission. Commissioner Franzese seconded the nomination.
6 Motion by Franzese, seconded by Makowske, to select Commissioner Thompson as Vice Chair
7 for 1996 Planning Commission.
8 Voting on the motion:
9 Aye: Bergstrom, Makowske, Delmonico, Franzese
10 Nay: Gondorchin
11 Abstention: Thompson
12 Motion carried.
03 IV. APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 16, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
14 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Gondorchin, to approve the Planning Commission Agenda
15 for January 16, 1996 as presented.
16
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18
19 V. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 19, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES.
20 Page 4, Line 33, change "is laudable and First Bank is a good company" to "First Bank's intent
21 to generate cash flow is laudable".
22 Page 6, Line 7, change "if the New Market planned for the corner part in the site plan" to
23 "whether the existing New Market located in the southwest corner in the site plan".
24 Page 6, Line 34, change "indicated" to "inquired if'.
25 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Gondorchin, to approve the Planning Commission minutes
26 of December 19, 1995 as corrected.
27
08 Motion carried unanimously,
29 VI. DESIGNATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
Page 3
•1 The Commission decided that a representative will not be designated for the January 23, 1996 City
2 Council Meeting, as there are no agenda items from the Commission scheduled for the meeting.
3
4 VII. PUBLIC HEARING.
5 It was noted that there was no public hearing.
6
7 VIII. ST. ANTHONY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
8 (Copy of overhead presentation made by Mr. Larson to be provided by Ms. Moore-Sykes)
9 Chair Bergstrom indicated the Commission has been meeting with each City department head for
10 a department overview and question and answer session.
11
12 Mr. Roger Larson, Finance Director, presented to the Planning Commission a review of tax base,
13 as well as an overview of Tax Increment Financing (TIF).
14 Mr. Larson reviewed that property taxes are determined by the state legislature, taxing
15 jurisdictions and the county assessor. He continued that the state establish's property classes and
16 class rates, determine levels of state aid, and unfunded mandates to local government.
07 Mr. Larson reviewed revenue percentages and advised that the composition of the City tax base
18 includes 73.9 percent residential, 12 percent apartments, 12.4 percent commercial, and 1.7
19 percent other sources. Commissioner Franzese inquired what is included in the "other" category.
20 Mr. Larson responded that vacant land, such as the Clark Station, or properties that are forfeited,
21 would be examples of this category.
22 Mr. Larson reviewed the 1996 total tax rate of 148.986 percent, comprising of 76.033 percent
23 from schools, 38.099 percent from County, 28.055 percent from City, and 6.799 percent from
24 other sources. Commissioner Franzese requested Mr. Larson explain tax rate. Mr. Larson
25 responded he will later in the presentation.
26 Mr. Larson reviewed the increase in tax rates from 1995 to 1996, including a 10.243 percent
27 increase in schools, .645 percent in County, 2.286 percent in City, and .180 percent in other.
28 Mr. Larson indicated that the school tax rate increased significantly.
29 Mr. Larson continued that proposed city tax rates are determined by the amount of money needed,
30 called a levy. He explained the total local levy is divided by the total local tax capacity, which
31 is $5,188,494, and then each property is assigned a tax capacity. Mr. Larson explained that each
32 resident's tax capacity is added together to get the total local tax capacity.
33 Mr. Larson indicated how critical planning is to the City, because any decrease in the $5,188,494
04 local tax capacity figure means an increase in the residential property taxes.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
• Page 4
1 Mr. Larson indicated how critical planning is to the City, because any decrease in the $5,188,494
2 local tax capacity figure means an increase in the residential property taxes.
3 Chair Bergstrom inquired the $5,188,494 is not the total value of all the property in St. Anthony.
4 Mr. Larson agreed, that the figure only represents approximately 1/10 of the total value.
5 Mr. Larson reviewed for the Commission why if valuations increase that tax rates do not
6 decrease. Mr. Larson indicated one reason was the City's fiscal disparities contribution, which
7 increased 20 percent in 1995. He continued the City has no control over this figure. Mr. Larson
8 indicated there is a great advantage to have industrial property in the community, because the tax
9 rate is higher than residential, which allows the communities that are disadvantaged in industrial
10 to collect tax monies from a pool. Mr. Larson indicated St. Anthony has a moderate of industrial
11 properties and does receive more from the pool than it contributes.
12 Commissioner Franzese questioned if the 20 percent increase in fiscal disparities contribution was
13 high, or over a certain threshold. Mr. Larson responded that it was not, and the 20 percent
14 increase was applied to all communities.
15 Mr. Larson continued that when apartment valuations decrease, it puts pressure on the residential
�6 tax base. Chair Bergstrom questioned if apartment values are not determined by the rent monies
7 collected. Mr. Larson agreed that higher valued properties can charge more for rent.
18 Mr. Larson reviewed that valuations for 1995 are used for the taxes due in 1996. He continued
19 that each year the City assesses approximately 1/4 of the homes, which means the entire City is
20 assessed approximately every four years.
21 Mr. Larson continued that the increases in residential values is responsible for most of the
22 valuation increase this year, because apartment and commercial values have declined in St.
23 Anthony.
24
25 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired how much of the valuations and levies are included in the
26 taxes. Mr. Larson responded that approximately 1/2 of the tax increase was because of the
27 referendum.
28 Mr. Larson reviewed the total local tax capacity in 1990 was $6,076,340. In 1996, the total tax
29 capacity is now $5,188,494, a decrease of $887,846. Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if a
30 large part of that decrease is due to Apache Plaza. Mr. Larson responded that it was, and
31 indicated the City Council is working hard to redevelop Apache Plaza. Chair Bergstrom indicated
32 the Planning Commission recognizes the importance of Apache Plaza as well.
103 Mr. Larson reviewed that 73.9 percent of the tax base is residential properties and they pay for
4 the majority of the tax increases.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
• January 16, 1996
Page 5
1 Mr. Larson reviewed the valuation of Apache Plaza in 1990 was $17,753,000 to $4,850,000 in
2 1995. He continued that the figures only included the core of Apache Plaza, not the outer
3 buildings such as New Market.
4 Commissioner Franzese inquired when the valuation is complete on Apache Plaza. Mr. Larson
5 responded that after the Truth in Taxation meeting, the Ramsey County Auditor contacted the City
6 to inform them that Apache Plaza had applied for another abatement. He continued that the City
7 could appeal, but has decided to postpone in light of the redevelopment that may occur.
8 Chair Bergstrom indicated Southdale had applied for an abatement as well. Commissioner
9 Makowske indicated that Roseville and the Mall of America had done the same.
10 Mr. Larson reviewed that if the Apache Plaza valuation decreases, then St. Anthony's total tax
11 capacity decreases, and taxes increase. Chair Bergstrom inquired if there was a limit to how low
12 the valuation can decrease before it would be similar to a "vacant lot." Mr. Larson indicated the
13 valuation is low, but its valuation is higher than a vacant lot would be. Chair Bergstrom inquired
14 how much more the valuation could decrease. Mr. Larson indicated that until redevelopment of
15 Apache occurs the valuation could continue to go down.
16 Commissioner Franzese inquired of the owners of Apache Plaza. Mr. Larson responded that at
7 one time a group of doctors owned Apache Plaza, and it appears Apache was used as a capital
18 gains write off during their ownership.
19 Mr. Larson reviewed the average home owner pays approximately $42 per year because of
20 Apache Plaza's lowered tax capacity. Commissioner Gondorchin indicated the number is only
21 a fraction because the other businesses take on much of the burden. Mr. Larson agreed.
22 Mr. Larson indicated the Planning Commission needs to recognize how critical planning is to the
23 total tax capacity of St. Anthony, and make decisions with tax base concerns in mind, such as not
24 replacing commercial with residential properties. Mr. Larson made an analogy that it would take
25 183 houses of$200,000 each to replace the tax capacity of Apache Plaza.
26 . Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if any portion of the formula would significantly impact the
27 residents. Mr. Larson responded the certified levy (53 percent) and the HACA (Homestead
28 Credit) is a significant part of the revenue. He continued the state gives a subsidy on property
29 taxes, and the revenue is goes to the City in the form of aid. Mr. Larson continued that HACA
30 amounts historically have not been changed. If they were services would be decreased drastically.
31 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if it was a "sacred cow" that would not be tampered with, and
32 Mr. Larson responded if it was cut, there would be a large state wide response.
63 Commissioner Franzese indicated that HACA had been decreased in the past with special
4 education. Mr. Larson responded it was an insignificant amount of approximately $3,000 to
35 $5,000 of the total $300,000 to $500,000.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
•
Page 6
1 Chair Bergstrom inquired what the Planning Commission can do, outside of the Apache Plaza
2 redevelopment, to help increase the tax rate. Mr. Larson responded that enforcing housing codes
3 in apartment and residential properties will keep the valuations high.
4 Chair Bergstrom inquired if there are other commercial or industrial properties that are not fully
5 developed. Mr. Larson indicated the only areas would be Apache Plaza and possibly the south
6 end, Industrial Park.
7 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired what Monarch contributes to the tax base. Mr. Larson
8 responded that three projects went immediately on the tax roles. Evergreen has added onto the
9 townhomes, the Arbors project and American Monarch. Mr. Larson indicated that Monarch
10 received a TIF contribution to make modifications, and is currently occupied by a business.
11 Commissioner Delmonico inquired what the trailer courts contribute to the tax base. Mr. Larson
12 responded he was unsure of the actual contributions, but indicated it would be a lower portion of
13 the tax scale.
14 Chair Bergstrom inquired of properties on the west side of St. Anthony. He continued that HRA
15 is aware of the land, and inquired if it would be worthwhile to the City to purchase it and
16 redevelop for potential resale. Mr. Larson responded the City would need to purchase the
7 property very close to valuation. He continued the City would receive opposition if it began
18 identifying properties as potential redevelopment houses. Chair Bergstrom indicated he agreed,
19 but the City should do something if a property such as that goes on the market. Mr. Larson
20 agreed.
21 Chair Bergstrom inquired if there were other financial instruments the City could use so the costs
22 do not come from the City. Mr. Larson indicated there was, but cautioned that federal authorities
23 have low income guidelines, and you may defeat the purpose by possibly selling to individuals
24 cannot afford to keep the property in good condition.
25 Chair Bergstrom inquired what the Planning Commission can do to encourage redevelopment
26 projects. Mr. Larson responded that the Commission can assist by working through variance
27 requests and special work. Chair Bergstrom inquired if this would be done before the projects
28 begin. Mr. Larson responded that a developer would first meet with HRA, then be referred to
29 the Planning Commission.
30 Chair Bergstrom inquired what an achievable target would be for the tax base, and what it has
31 been historically. Mr. Larson responded that last year, residential was 72 percent of the base, and
32 commercial and industrial were 13 percent. He continued that realistically the City needs to
33 decrease its dependence on the residential portion, and in fairness to its residents, decrease that
*4 portion to 68-70 percent. Mr. Larson continued the only other choice would be to decrease
5 services, because the budget has already been trimmed significantly.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
Page 7
1 Chair Bergstrom inquired what the Planning Commission can do to decrease the residential
2 category of tax. Mr. Larson responded to be very critical of a residential project proposed in a
3 commercial area.
4
5 Chair Bergstrom inquired what would be the optimal split between residential and commercial.
6 Mr. Larson replied it would be half residential and half commercial, but the key with commercial
7 was Apache Plaza being a major contributor.
8 Commissioner Thompson indicated it was important to be kind to business to keep them in St.
9 Anthony.
10 Mr. Larson continued his presentation with an overview of Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Mr.
11 Larson reviewed that when a property is identified at a certain value, that value is frozen at the
12 beginning of the project. He continued that tax money still goes to the City, school and County,
13 but when the project is complete, the increase in valuation is captured by the developer, not the
14 City. He continued that TIF monies pay off the debt and further explained that taxes are not less,
15 they are merely split.
16 Commissioner Franzese indicated an example of TIF would be Kensington Apartments. Mr.
�7 Larson agreed, and continued that the City protects its interests by using the added valuation to
8 pay off the bonds.
19 Chair Bergstrom inquired what the developer's incentive is to do TIF. Mr. Larson responded they
20 receive money to complete their project.
21 Mr. Larson indicated there are currently three TIF districts in Ramsey County; Chandler Nursing
22 Homes, Evergreen Townhomes, and Hellickson.
23 Chair Bergstrom inquired if the TIF projects are assessed like other properties. Mr. Larson
24 responded they were, except the original value stays the same, until it is de-certified.
25 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the captured value can increase, it is a benefit to the owner.
26 Mr. Larson responded it was, and St. Anthony HRA is a developer in the three TIF district
27 projects. Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if any increase pays the TIF faster so the monies
28 can be used elsewhere. Mr. Larson responded it can, and currently the monies will be used to
29 fund the new City Hall.
30 Mr. Larson cited that the City was given the City Hall building by the school district, and in turn
31 the district rented the space free of charge for 5 years. Commissioner Franzese indicated the
32 district sold the building to the City for $1.00 when the population was declining.
103 Commissioner Franzese inquired if the commercial appraised value continues to increase, then
34 taxes should decrease when fiscal disparities and housing is down. Mr. Larson agreed, because
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
•
Page 8
1 commercial has decreased, residential has increased and reiterated the redevelopment of Apache
2 Plaza is critical.
3 Commissioner Franzese inquired what is the length of TIF. Mr. Larson responded a length of
4 25 years is generally used, but the Council has been sensitive to complete projects in 15 years or
5 less to get projects on the tax rolls as soon as possible. Mr. Larson indicated the Planning
6 Commission can be sensitive to valuation concerns with regards to any project in the City.
7 Chair Bergstrom indicated a low interest housing program currently in Illinois to increase the
8 residential of the City, and inquired if a similar program would work in St. Anthony. Mr. Larson
9 responded there was discussion on a similar project. Chair Bergstrom questioned if this program
10 would be hard on the budget. Mr. Larson responded it would not be, but added there is a limited
11 amount of TIF money to be used. He continued a concern would be to attract the type of people
12 that would keep their properties in good condition, so as not to defeat the purpose.
13 Commissioner Makowske inquired if there were any major capital improvement projects planned
14 by the City beside the road project. Mr. Larson responded that due to the budget, the 1996 road
15 improvement project has been postponed until next year, and may change to an every other year
16 project permanently.
*7 Commissioner Makowske inquired if there have been any changes to TIF rules in the last few
18 months. Mr. Larson responded the City currently has five TIF projects now, and the long range
19 goal is not to increase the number of TIF's, as there are now penalties for establishing new
20 districts.
21 In closing, Mr. Larson stressed his presentation was an overview of some of the financial issues
22 which he has been involved. He asked the Planning Commission to be aware that the ultimate
23 decision of all financial issues and the direction St. Anthony takes lies with the City Council and
24 ultimately the residents of the community.
25 The Planning Commission gave their thanks to Mr. Larson for his presentation.
26 Chair Bergstrom recessed at 9:00 p.m. . The Planning Commission reconvened at 9:05 p.m.
27 IX. MISCELLANEOUS UPDATE/REVIEW.
28 A. Review Apache Plaza EAW
29 Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant, indicated a copy of the proposed environmental
30 assessment worksheet that has been submitted. Chair Bergstrom, Commissioner Makowske, and
031 Commissioner Franzese indicated they wished to have a copy.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
Page 9
1 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if Mr. Finn's concerns from the last meeting can be
2 addressed.
3 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mr. Finn's charge of demolition of more than 25 percent is not
4 true according to the environment attorneys from First Bank and Opus.
5 Commissioner Makowske questioned if Mr. Finn forwarded the information he indicated to Chair
6 Bergstrom. Chair Bergstrom indicated he did not receive anything from Mr. Finn.
7 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the attorneys are trying to anticipate those questions, that may
8 come from Mr. Finn and others. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated there are few homeowners around
9 the lake area that are not supporting the Apache Plaza redevelopment due to devaluations and
10 taxes.
11 Commissioner Franzese clarified for Commissioner Delmonico the issue of the ecology of the lake
12 and the phosphorus content with respect to the Apache Plaza redevelopment.
13 Ms. Moore-Sykes reviewed with the Commission the site map presented to Staff earlier, indicating
14 Outlots A, B, and C, storm water retention ponds included in the development, and Lot 1-6, with
15 Lot 7 remaining after demolition. She continued that Rice Creek Watershed (RCWS) has these
6 plans.
17 Chair Bergstrom indicated he spoke with the RCWS manager who indicated that at this point they
18 have no preliminary concerns with the plan, as it appears to be in conformance with RCWS
19 standards. He continued that RCWS cannot make any recommendations without the EAW's
20 approval, but at this point, it appears to be acceptable.
21 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the January 30th Special Planning Commission will address the zero
22 lot line issue, as well as this plan.
23 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the conceptual idea for Lot 7 on the site plan is only for the
24 purpose of the January 30th meeting, and may change.
25 Chair Bergstrom questioned if the submission for the fourth water pond is shown on the plan.
26 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated it was to appear on the plan, and may be the EAW report. She
27 continued that grading and elevations such as Phase I will run to retention ponds, and there is no
28 need to change Lot 7, as it is not developed.
29 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the ponding will be in front of New Market. Ms. Moore-
30 Sykes indicated that it will.
01 Commissioner Thompson inquired if the ,name will be changed to "Silver Lake Center" as
32 indicated on the plan. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that it was being considered, but would likely
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
Page 10
1 stay as Apache Plaza because historically the name holds meaning and background to many
2 different entities.
3 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that a vacation of easement for water and sewer is being reviewed by
4 the attorney and engineer for the City. She continued the original title included easements for
5 water and sewer, and the City may want to vacate those for construction, but then maintain them
6 after construction, as the City will always be there to ensure proper maintenance.
7 Chair Bergstrom inquired if there were any street easements. Ms. Moore-Sykes responded there
8 were only utility easements.
9 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the EAW has addressed a traffic study, and it appears Cub Foods
10 owns a portion of the road between Hardee's and Pro-Exhaust. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that
11 Cub customers use the north roadway, and that Ramsey County will be updating the lights on
12 Silver Lake Road, installing single lights at the comer.
13 Chair Bergstrom indicated the City Council suggested the Planning Commission hold a special
14 worksession before the January 30th meeting to ensure the Commission is prepared and fully
15 informed on the Apache Plaza redevelopment plan.
416 Chair Bergstrom suggested holding the worksession meeting on January 23, 1996. Ms. Moore-
17 Sykes indicated she will have the remaining information from Opus by that time.
18 Commissioner Gondorchin indicated he would like assurances from legal counsel if variances or
19 a zero lot line will be needed before the January 30th meeting. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated a zero
20 lot line has been done in the past, but will verify what is needed before the meeting.
21 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the detail information will be available for the worksession.
22 Ms. Moore-Sykes responded she will prepare packets for the Commission which will include the
23 information.
24 B. Vacation of Easement by City
25 Ms. Moore-Sykes reported to the Commission that an easement had been discovered for the Bruce
26 Nedegaard project during title recording, and the City has been requested to vacate the easement
27 so a clear title can be recorded.
28 Chair Bergstrom inquired if there are any disadvantages to the City in vacating the easement. Ms.
29 Moore-Sykes indicated she is unaware of any disadvantage, and that it is likely needed only to
30 clear the title.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
Page 11
1 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired what will be built over the easement. Ms. Moore-Sykes
2 indicated that there will be nothing built over the easement, that it is merely a land-locked
3 easement, and the surveyors will file once the City vacates it.
4 Commissioner Gondorchin indicated that as long as the City doesn't need the easement for
5 emergency access, the vacation should be granted.
6 Motion by Bergstrom, seconded by Franzese, to concur with the City Council in recommending
7 the proposed vacation of easement as it appears to serve no purpose.
8 Motion carried unanimously,
9 C. Permitted Conditional Uses - Commercial Zoned Districts
10 Ms. Moore-Sykes reported to the Commission that because of the apparent inappropriateness of
11 the Solid Rock Church in a commercial district, the City Council has requested the Planning
12 Commission review permitted conditional uses for.all of the zoning districts. She continued a
13 recommendation from the Planning Commission would be made to the City Council, and upon
14 three readings of the proposed ordinance change, the change will become effective.
05 Chair Bergstrom inquired if the Commission should review and make a recommendation now, or
16 would a subgroup be more appropriate.
17 Commissioner Gondorchin suggested Staff provide a list with the districts, permanent uses, and
18 other information, and the Planning Commission will make a recommendation based on that. He
19 continued that he would volunteer to be part of the recommendation group.
20 Commissioner Makowske indicated that uses refer to either a commercial use or a specific use,
21 and that a church may be appropriate in a commercial use but not a retail use.
22 Chair Bergstrom indicated a subgroup comprised of himself, Commissioner Gondorchin and
23 Commissioner Delmonico, will make a recommendation by the next regular City Council meeting.
24 D. Sign Ordinance
25 Ms. Moore-Sykes reported the City Council has requested the Planning Commission to review-
26 the current sign ordinance as it relates to professional buildings such as Apache Plaza Medical
27 Building. She continued that the City currently has no definition of a commercial establishment
28 in the Ordinance. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that City Council has requested the Planning
29 Commission review and make a recommendation on the definition of a commercial establishment.
oi0 She continued that upon a recommendation, the City Council will hold three public readings of
l the proposed revision and the change will become effective upon publication.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
Page 12
1 Chair Bergstrom suggested the recommendation process be done in the same way as the
2 conditional use recommendation. Chair Bergstrom and Commissioner Makowske indicated they
3 wish to be a part of this subgroup.
4 Chair Bergstrom indicated the sign ordinance is sufficient once a definition is determined and
5 suggested the Planning Commission complete the recommendation by the March meeting.
6 Commissioner Franzese noted the buildings along France and Crosstown 62 has signage above
7 the first floor. She also noted the professional building behind the Lunds store now has a
8 beautician as a tenant.
9 X. STAFF UPDATE.
10 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the January 30th Special Planning Commission meeting will be held
11 in the Community Center Cafeteria in anticipation of large public attendance.
12 Chair Bergstrom noted an editorial appeared in the Northeaster which spoke to the financing and
13 City obligations to Apache Plaza.
4 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated a workshop will be held on the Livable Communities Act Friday,
5 February 16, 1996, and that Mike Morrison has requested that she and one Planning
16 Commissioner member attend. Chair Bergstrom indicated he will attend the workshop.
17 Commissioner Franzese inquired who was sponsoring the workshop. Ms. Moore-Sykes
18 responded the Metropolitan Council.
19 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated a preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision of land for the
20 redevelopment of the Apache Plaza Shopping Center was sent to Bill Soth, attorney for Dorsey
21 and Whitney.
22 Commissioner Delmonico thanked the Commission, and noted he was looking forward to working
23 with them.
24 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired where the meeting will be on January 23rd. Ms. Moore-
25 Sykes indicated it will be held in Room 9, and that the landscaping as well as other information
26 will be there for review.
27 Commissioner Gondorchin requested an artist's conception be used rather than an engineer's
28 drawing. Chair Bergstrom agreed, but suggested having both available.
09 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated Jay Scott and Westwood Engineering will be present at the meeting
0 to answer questions.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 1996
Page 13
1 Commissioner Franzese noted from the discussion with Mr. Larson that the City gave the school
2 district the land, not the building.
3 Commissioner Thompson noted the Schroeder property is in very good condition.
4 Commissioner Makowske welcomed Commissioner Delmonico to the group. He noted that he
5 will not be at the January 30th meeting due to a school conflict, but will be at the January 23rd
6 meeting.
7 Chair Bergstrom had no further comments.
8 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
9 Motion by Franzese, seconded by Thompson, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
10 Motion carried unanimously,
11 Respectfully submitted,
42 Cathy Sorensen
3 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
3 SPECIAL MEETING
4 JANUARY 30, 1996
5 I. CALL TO ORDERIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
6 The meeting was called to order and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chair Bergstrom at 7:10
7 p.m.
8
9 II. ROLL CALL.
10 Commissioners present: Bergstrom,Delmonico,Gondorchin,Franzese,Thompson,and Horst.
11 Commissioners absent: Makowske.
12 Also present: Kim Moore-Sykes,Management Assistant;Bill Soth,City Attorney; Michael
13 Mornson, City Manager; Larry Hamer, Public Works Director; and Cathy
14 Sorensen, Recording Secretary.
15 III. DESIGNATE COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO FEBRUARY 13, 1996 COUNCIL
16 MEETING.
17 Commissioner Horst was designated as the Planning Commission representative for the February
18 13, 1996 Council meeting.
19 Chair Bergstrom welcomed those attending the public hearing,and commended the audience on their
20 interest in the Apache Plaza project. Chair Bergstrom introduced Bill Soth, Mike Morrison, Kim
21 Moore-Sykes, and Cathy Sorensen.
22 Chair Bergstrom gave an overview for the public hearing process. He continued that through the
23 redevelopment attempt one year ago, much was learned and the process will be better for it.
24 Chair Bergstrom gave an overview of the approval process by category, with the first being the
25 Environmental Assessment Worksheet. He explained that initial environmental assessments
26 measures environmental impact of the project, evaluates impact on human health, traffic, storm
27 water, air and noise pollution. He continued it is a very comprehensive plan, and is currently open
28 for public comments. Chair Bergstrom explained written comments are solicited and should be
29 completed to the City by February 14, 1996.
30 Chair Bergstrom continued the second category in the approval process would be City Council
31 approval. He explained the Council will approve approximately 10 items regarding construction
32 before the project is begun.
1
• f
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 2
1 Chair Bergstrom explained the last category in the approval process are permits required by other
2 government agencies, such as the Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, and
3 the Rice Creek Watershed, who determines proper grading, water quality, and run off.
4 Chair Bergstrom continued this was a portion of a larger context, and that projects get much scrutiny
5 before construction begins. He continued the Planning Commission's role in the process is to ensure
6 the projects presented are consistent with current property and land use zoning requirements outlined
7 in the Comprehensive Plan.
8 Chair Bergstrom explained there were two public hearings on the agenda, one to approve the
9 preliminary plat to subdivide the lots, and the second to evaluate a request for a setback variance
10 from the lot lines. He continued a review of the comprehensive sign plan was also on the agenda,
11 but was not open to public hearing. Chair Bergstrom explained the Planning Commission makes
12 recommendations to the City Council, but the Council has the final approval.
13 Chair Bergstrom explained a representative from OPUS would present an overview the project for
14 the audience, as well as a brief overview of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW),
15 because the scope of the EAW is much larger than what can be reviewed this evening. He continued
16 a public hearing will be opened, a report will be made by staff, a representative from OPUS will be
17 available for questions from the Planning Commission and the public, and a motion will be made.
18 Chair Bergstrom instructed those wishing to comment speak into the microphone, state their name
19 and address, and to keep their comments brief and to the point. Chair Bergstrom continued the
20 Planning Commission is very familiar with the Apache Plaza project, and has had several concept
21 reviews, work sessions, and meetings with staff regarding the project.
22 Jay Scott, Director of Development of OPUS Corporation, thanked the Planning Commission and
23 audience for the opportunity to resent the project and to share OPUS'thou is and ideas. Mr. Scott
PP h' P P J t�
24 explained that OPUS is acting as a facilitator and development consultant for the Apache Plaza
25 project, working with SuperValu, Ste. Marie Corporation, and the City. He continued OPUS was
26 hopeful to be involved in ownership at a future point. He explained that OPUS Corporation is over
27 40 years old, and is the largest developer in the nation. He continued that OPUS has developed over
28 eight million square feet nationwide, 36 percent of which is retail. Mr. Scott explained OPUS has
29 developments in Maple Grove, Golden Valley, Eagan, and Highland Park, and that he oversees
30 developments in a five to six state region.
31 Mr. Scott explained the Planning Commission has a detailed report of the redevelopment plans. He
32 continued the redevelopment would be completed in one phase, possibly two, but that paramount
33 to that success would be approval of subdivision of the lot into seven separate lots.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 3
1 Mr. Scott continued Cub Foods is planned for the health club space and 100,000 additional square
2 feet. He stated plans to demolish the former J.C. Penney site, as well as the mall's north wall. Mr.
3 Scott explained a new wall will be built to cap the north wall, and that a zero lot line approval will
4 be needed because the building will encroach once completed.
5 Mr. Scott explained storm water and drainage will involve construction and maintenance of a
6 comprehensive drainage treatment and ponding system, and that it will comply with the Rice Creek
7 Watershed. He continued it will handle Cub Foods, First Bank, and two other outlots of specialty
8 retail stores. Mr. Scott explained the comprehensive drainage plan has been designed to
9 accommodate future phases, and that the information is with the Environmental Assessment
10 Worksheet and complies with the Rice Creek Watershed. He continued that plans were for the City
11 to maintain the drainage system once construction is complete, as the City will ensure maintenance
12 is done correctly and in a timely manner.
13 Mr. Scott continued that no decision has been made to future redevelopment, but stated the plans
14 were exciting and that OPUS' goal is the same as the City's and the residents, envisioning Apache
15 Plaza as a strip/commercial center, with larger retailers.
16 Joan Ahrens,representative for Cub Foods/SuperValu, stated they have been involved in the project
17 for some time, and are happy to be in the final process. She explained that Cub Foods will occupy
18 9 1/2 acres on the north side of the mall, and will be a 75,000 square foot new prototype store,
19 _ smaller than the Crystal and Maple Grove stores, but similar to the Maplewood store. Ms. Ahrens
20 stated construction is planned for May or June, with store opening in October. She continued that
21 Cub will employ 250-300 people, and will be a positive influence in the community.
22 Craig Matheson, Project Manager of P1anMark, stated the Cub Foods will be a fresh-focus store,
23 with a full line deli, seafood, bakery, and floral shop on one side.
24
25 Chair Bergstrom inquired if there were any questions from the public. Mr. Doug Jones,2505 Silver
26 Lake Road,asked for more information on the proposed signage. Chair Bergstrom responded it will
27 be addressed later in the agenda.
28 IV. PUBLIC HEARING.
29 A. Application for Subdivision of Land - Ste. Marie Company
30 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Kim Moore-Sykes read the staff report:
31 Ste. Marie Corporation, current owner of the Apache Plaza Shopping Center, is requesting a
32 subdivision of land in order to redevelop the shopping center. The purpose of the subdivision and
33 replatting of this property is to enhance the orderly redevelopment of the property, providing
34 interested retailers the opportunity to take advantage of redeveloped property as it becomes available
35 and allowing the existing mall to remain in operation during the redevelopment.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 4
1 The replatting of the property will allow for the creation of seven(7) retail lots and three (3) outlots
2 for the construction of storm water retention ponds. Lot 1 is being planned for the construction of
3 a 75,200 square foot Cub Food store; Lot 2 (First Bank), Lot 5 (Tires Plus), and Lot 6 (Taco Bell)
4 will be maintained in their existing retail use; and Lots 3 and 4 will be redeveloped for a single-
5 tenant or multi-tenant retail facilities. Lot 7 will contain the existing mall and the balance of the
6 property, all of which may be redeveloped at a later date.
7 The whole of the Apache Plaza.Shopping Center is the district zoned for General Commercial. As
8 such, the commercial district requires that all lots have an area of at least 15,000 square feet and a
9 minimum width of 100 feet. Proposed Lot 1 has approximately 403,801.2 square feet and is 524.6
10 feet wide; proposed Lot 3 is approximately 61,419.6 square feet and is 235.31 feet wide; and
11 proposed Lot 4 is approximately 61;855.2 square feet and is 244.7 feet wide. Lot 2 is approximately
12 57,499.2 square feet and 179.3 feet wide; Lot 5 is approximately 56,628 square feet and 232.5 feet
13 wide; Lot 6 is approximately 34,412.4 square feet and 121.1 feet wide; and Lot 7 is approximately
14 1,433,559.6 square feet. Lots 2,5,6 and 7 have existing retail uses.. According to the preliminary
15 plan, all lots meet the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance for lot size and width.
16 All lots as represented by the preliminary plat appear to have direct access to Silver Lake Road. The
17 developer is proposing to also create reciprocal easements for access, parking and utilities to serve
18 the proposed lots and to permit the ultimate retail uses to function as a single shopping center. The
19 City's attorney has advised that the City should condition any approval of the plat on the City's
20 review and approval of an agreement in recordable form before the plat is signed and released by the
21 City.
22 According to the City's Ordinance, Section 1650.05, adequate parking must be provided and is
23 determined based on the gross floor area of the building on the lot. SuperValu is proposing to build
24 a 75,200 square foot Cub Food store and providing 573 parking spaces. .The ordinance requires that
25 there be one space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area. SuperValu, therefore, is required
26 to provide a minimum of 251 parking spaces.
27 The existing business on Lots 2, 5, 6 and 7 currently provide adequate parking. Since the size of the
28 structures to be built on Lots 3 and 4 is unknown at this time, it is not possible to determine the
29 minimum number of parking spaces that would be required under this section of the City Code. This
30 will be evaluated at the time that Ste. Marie Corporation provides the City with the site plans for
31 each of these lots.
32 The proposed Cub Foods building meets the required setback requirements of the City's Ordinance
33 as stated in Section 1635.05. If the subdivision of land is approved,the existing mall building on
34 Lot 7 will not meet the side yard setback requirement of 10 feet. The Ste. Marie Corporation has
35 applied for a sideyard setback variance of 10 feet.
36 Duane Grace, Building Inspector for the City, has advised that this "zero-lot line" is acceptable
37 according to the Uniform Building Code, provided that a two-hour rated fire wall be constructed,
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 5
1 a 60 foot right-of-way is maintained between the Cub Foods store and the existing mall, and the
2 sprinkling system is maintained.
3 The City Attorney has suggested that each lot have its own sewer and water connections. Where a
4 lot does not have direct access and connections to the main utilities under Silver Lake Road, or in
5 other public easements, such easements will need to be created either in the plat or as suggested
6 earlier by Mr. Soth, City Attorney, through a reciprocal easement agreement. The Public Works
7 Director has verified that each lot can be served with sewer, water and other necessary utilities.
8 An Environmental Assessment Worksheet has been completed. The City Attorney has advised that
9 until the requirements of the law relating to the Environmental Worksheet are met,the project should
10 not have final approval from the Council.
11 The City Attorney has also advised the City that the existing Declaration of Restrictions filed and
;s 12 recorded a year ago as part of the previous plat approval will be terminated when the new plat is
13 filed. These restrictions are not necessary for the City's protection provided the land is replatted.
14 Title insurance information has been provided by Ste. Marie Corporation as per Mr. Soth's request.
15 Based on the information provided by Ste. Marie Corporation and the conditions and advice
16 provided by the City Attorney, Staff recommends approval of Ste. Marie Corporation's petition for
17 subdivision of land in order to facilitate the redevelopment of the Apache Shopping Center.
18 Chair Bergstrom requested Mr.'Scott to present a brief overview of the subdivision on the site plan.
19 Mr. Scott reviewed the site plan for the audience, and explained the seven lots and three outlots that
20 will be created.
21 Chair Bergstrom asked if the Commission had any questions for Mr. Scott. No questions were
22 raised. Chair Bergstrom asked if the audience had any questions for Mr. Scott. No questions were
23 raised. Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m.
24
25 Motion by Gondorchin, seconded by Thompson, to approve the proposed subdivision for the
26 property known as Apache Plaza as long as all twelve issues identified in a January 24, 1996 letter
27 to the Planning Commission by legal counsel William Soth are resolved by the City of St. Anthony
28 administration.
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30 B. Variance Request for Sideyard Setback- Ste. Marie Company
31
32 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. Ms. Moore-Sykes read the staff report:
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 6
1 The Ste. Marie Corporation has submitted a sideyard setback variance request for the existing mall
2 building on the newly created Lot 7, Apache Plaza. The subdivision of land is intended to create
3 several commercial lots which will provide redevelopment opportunities to SuperValu and other
_ 4 potential retailers. The J.C. Penney's portion of the existing mall and the health club will be
5 demolished to allow for the construction of a Cub Foods store. The remaining north portion of the
6 mall will be situated on the newly created property line between Lot 7 and Lot 1. According to the
7 City Zoning Ordinance, Section 1635.05, Subd. 5, interior side yards of commercial buildings are
8 required to be 10 feet in width.
9 In a letter submitted to the City by Jack Amdal, KKE Architects, there are several issues that are
10 particular to Apache Plaza as it currently exists and which are creating redevelopment hardships that
11 has necessitated Ste. Marie Corporation's request for a side yard setback variance of 10 feet. These
12 issues include:
_ 13 1. Ste. Marie Corporation needs to deal with a deteriorating and obsolete shopping
14 center mall which requires significant redevelopment and restructuring activities to
15 bring it to its best and reasonable use as a commercial property.
16 2. A portion of the mall must remain intact because there are a number of existing
17 leases that run for the next several years. In order to accommodate these tenants and
18 SuperValu's interest in building a Cub Food store, Ste. Marie Corporation proposes
-19 to leave most of the mall standing.
20 3. For the safety of the occupants, the structural integrity of the central mall must be
21 maintained. In allowing a side yard set back variance at the renovated north end,the
22 need to restructure the existing roofing system and structure will be eliminated.
23 Also,an emergency exit,which is required by the Uniform Building Code and public
24 restrooms will not be eliminated and access to the mall from the west will remain
25 useable.
26 The granting of a side yard variance for Lot 7 allows for the reasonable use and continued
27 accessibility of the remaining mall,while also enabling planned redevelopment plans for the whole
28 property to move forward.
29 Duane.Grace submitted a report to the City upon reviewing plans for the proposed partial demolition
30 of northern portion of the existing mall involving the old J.C. Penney's store. In his report, Mr.
31 Grace advised the City that according to the Uniform Building Code, a zero-lot line for the
32 remaining mall building will be acceptable provided that 1.) a two-hour(2)fire rated area separation
33 wall be constructed to replace that wall that is removed and that this wall be continued at right angles
34 to the east and west of the exterior of the Cub Foods store for an additional five (5) feet in each
35 direction; 2.) 60 feet of open area be maintained around Cub Foods store and the remaining portion
36 of the existing mall as is required,with the exception of the northern wall;and 3.)that both buildings
37 will maintain a fully automatic fire suppression systems.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 7
1 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 10 foot side yard
2 variance request made by Ste. Marie Corporation. If the variance is granted, it will not alter the
3 essential character of the property or locality. The variance request was made for the purpose of
4 enhancing the redevelopment of the property to return it to its reasonable and best use.
5 Because the Ste. Marie Corporation acquired this property through the deed in lieu of foreclosure,
6 they did not create the hardship that has caused them to request the side yard variance.
7 Chair Bergstrom asked for any questions of staff. No questions were raised. Mr. Scott gave an
8 overview of the area for the variance, and stated they were prepared to meet all guidelines of
9 reconstruction of wall and to move forward for Phase I.
10 Commissioner Gondorchin asked if the zero lot line is approved, what the exterior of the mall will
11 resemble. Mr. Scott responded that plans were not finalized, but it would be comparable to the
12 current Apache Plaza, and would look complete.
13 Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. after no further questions were raised.
14 Motion by Gondorchin, seconded by Franzese,to approve 10 foot sideyard/zero lot line request for
15 the property known as Apache Plaza, Lot 7, based on the following rationale:
16 1. Strict enforcement of existing codes would cause undue hardship preventing the
17 redevelopment of a deteriorating and obsolete structure.
18 2. Ste. Marie Corporation acquired the property through the deed in lieu of foreclosure,
19 and the mall must remain intact and operational to honor leases of existing tenants.
20 The circumstances are unique and not created by the individual.
21 3. Granting of the variance will not alter the character of the area and makes sound
22 economic sense for the City of St. Anthony.
23 4. The wall to be constructed on the lot line, endorsed by Building Official Duane C.
24 Grace,will be constructed conforming to the Uniform Building Code, Section 504.6.
25 See letter dated December 27, 1995 addressed to Larry Hamer representing the City
26 of St. Anthony and Jack Amdal, Vice President of KKE Architects.
27 Motion carried unanimously.
28
29 V. OTHER ITEMS.
30 A. Review Comprehensive Sign Plan
31 Ms. Moore-Sykes read the staff report:
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 8
1 The Ste. Marie Corporation, owner of the Apache Plaza Shopping Center has submitted plans to the
_ 2 City of St. Anthony that is virtually the same as the Comprehensive Sign Plan that was originally
3 submitted in November, 1994.
4 The difference between this proposed sign package and the one that the Planning Commission
5 recommended for approval in 1994 is that Ste. Marie Corporation and OPUS are proposing to have
6 up to five (5) ground signs. A ground sign is being requested for lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
_ 7 By submitting a comprehensive sign package, exceptions to the regulations of the sign ordinance
8 may be permitted. The purpose of providing this exception is to recognize that because of the size
9 of the current mall and the proposed redevelopment of additional retail areas, i.e., Cub Foods, the
10 size-and number of signs will be greater than is allowed by the City's Sign Ordinance.
11 This exception also gives the Planning Commission and the City Council the flexibility that enables
12 them to look at the overall concept and make exceptions to the ordinance.
13 Chair Bergstrom asked for any questions of staff. Mr. Scott gave an overview of the proposed sign
.14 package, stating OPUS agrees that signs would be eight feet in height, but is requesting a variance
15 of size,requesting 64 square feet per side. He continued the proposed center wide pylon sign would
16 be north of the current pylon, 42 feet high, and that it agrees with the specifications approved in the
17 1994 package. He continued that identifying Apache Plaza is a key issue, and that building signage
18 may vary slightly, but not greatly.
19 Mr. Scott explained all signage will conform to approved lettering, contain no neon or lighted signs,
20 etc. Mr. Scott presented renderings of proposed signage, stating they were attractive with brick and
21 stucco. He noted the signage size is important for the success of the tenants and the mall, and that
22 most cities allow more. Mr. Scott continued they were not requesting extraordinary sizes, but were
23 preparing for the requests that will come from tenants.
24 Chair Bergstrom explained for the audience the sign sizes in the originally approved package would
25 be similar to the TCF Bank sign,while this size would be slightly lower, similar to the Hardee's sign.
26 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired where the pylon sign would be placed. Mr. Scott responded it
27 would be placed slightly north of the current pylon.
28 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the landscaping has been finalized. Mr. Scott responded it
29 was not finalized yet, but would be minimal along Silver Lake Road to give as much visibility for
30 tenants to traffic.
31 Commissioner Horst stated his concern the current signs at Tires Plus,Taco Bell,and First Bank will
32 be different from the proposed sig n package. Mr. Scott responded if those companies are interested
33 they would like to change their signage to be consistent, but stated there would be a cost involved.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 9
1 Commissioner Horst inquired how the new pylon sign could be flexible now, as tenants are coming
2 to the project; they may want different signage. Mr. Scott responded they would not be changing
3 the sign now because the cost would be too high; they pylon sign would suffice for the time. He
4 continued the sign package would be a marketing tool in leasing to ensure potential tenants a positive
5 sign package is in place.
6 Chair Bergstrom asked if the monument sign is approved, will OPUS create and build the sign now.
7 Mr. Scott responded they are only requesting approval for construction for a consistent approved
8 package. Chair Bergstrom verified the intent is to create an opportunity for signage, but not a
9 guarantee. Mr. Scott replied that was correct.
10 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the Cub Foods proposed sign would be eight or 15 feet in
11 height. Mr. Scott replied the Cub Foods pylon is proposed for 30 feet, similar to the other Cub
12 Foods-stores. Commissioner Gondorchin stated the eight foot height would apply to Lots 3, 4, 5,
13 and 6.
14 Commissioner Franzese inquired how the proposed Cub Foods sign compares to other store's signs.
15 Craig Nevissen, SuperValu, responded it would be a typical pylon sign, 30 feet high with a 10x13
16 foot panel. He continued the material was panaflex, interior illuminated, and would be consistent
17 with the mall. He offered a portfolio of photos for the Commission to review.
18 Commissioner Franzese inquired how it compared with other Cub Foods signs. Mr. Nevissen
19 replied it would be consistent with the other signs.
20 Commissioner Thompson inquired if Tires Plus and First Bank can receive ground signs if they
21 request one. Mr. Scott replied he has not had any conversations as of yet with tenants, so he is
22 unaware of any requests. He continued they would work to meet their requests for a consistent look.
23 Commissioner Franzese inquired how the ground sign sizes were determined. Mr. Scott replied it
24 was determined based on discussions with staff on what would likely be acceptable. He reiterated
25 the proposed size is relatively smaller than other cities, but would be adequate and would create an
26 aesthetic curbside appeal.
27 Mr. Doug Jones, 2505 Silver Lake Road, inquired if OPUS felt there was a need for additional
28 signage on Stinson Boulevard to direct traffic, as well as the orientation of the signs. Mr. Scott
29 responded OPUS would be willing to explore additional signage for efficient flow of traffic by
30 adding entry and directional signs.
31 Mr. Jones inquired if the Commission felt additional signage is necessary on Stinson Boulevard.
32 Chair Bergstrom responded the Commission normally responds to applicants' requests, and no
33 request was made. He continued he did not see it being detrimental to the City. Mr. Jones continued
34 he is concerned about increased traffic and felt the Commission should be proactive and make a
35 recommendation to allow for this additional traffic. He continued that new people would be driving
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 10
1 in the area, and would need additional signage for Cub at the rear of Cub as 50 percent of customers
2 would enter by Stinson.
3 Commissioner Horst stated if the proposed center remains as it is planned, signage would be
4 adequate. He continued if future plans are realized, signage would need to be increased.
5 Mr. Jones reiterated that people will enter Cub from Stinson. Mr. Scott responded he would be
6 unsure of sign placement, and is likely a right-of-way. He continued he would be willing to address
7 the need if it arises.
8 Commissioner Franzese indicated a stop sign is located at 39th and Stinson, and when a traffic light
9 may be added. Mr. Hamer responded that weather permitting, they will begin installation of the
10 lights in the Spring of 1996.
11 Commissioner Gondorchin indicated he did not want to discount additional signage, but felt
12 SuperValu's judgement should be respected.
13 Commissioner Franzese asked for clarification of current wall signs and how it coincides with the
14 proposed package. Mr.Hamer stated City ordinance allows two square feet of wall signage for every
15 lineal foot, and if in conformance could be dictated in color, size, etc.
16 Motion by Gondorchin, seconded by Franzese,to recommend Comprehensive Sign Plan for Apache
17 Plaza.
18 Motion carried unanimously.
19 Chair Bergstrom stated this concluded the official business, and inquired if there were any questions
20 from the audience that could be addressed.
21 Commissioner Franzese invited the audience to come forward to see the site plans and renderings,
22 and stated Mr. Scott would be available to answer questions.
23 Mr. Jones inquired when the Rice Creek Watershed hearing would be held. Mr. Mornson indicated
24 a date had not been set. Mr. Jones inquired when the TIF hearing was scheduled. Mr. Mornson
25 stated it would be discussed at the City Council's regular meeting, but not as a public hearing. He
26 anticipated it would be on the next month's agenda.
27 VI. ADJOURNMENT.
28 Motion by Franzese, seconded by Thompson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:31 p.m.
29
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 11
1 Respectfully submitted,
2 Cathy Sorensen
3 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
CONDITIONAL USE COMMENTS - ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CITY CODES
Page 16-12 Code Book
1615.03 Permitted Conditional Uses(B)
Comments: Should libraries be listed as a permitted conditional use in an R-I district?
Page 16-14 Code Book
_ 1616.02& 1616.03 Permitted&Conditional Uses.
Comments: Should R-lA mirror R-1?
Page 16-16 Code Book
1620.02& 1620.03 Permitted&Conditional Uses.
Comments: Should R-2 Two-Family District mirror R-1?
Page*16-18 Code Book
1625.02& 1625.03 Permitted&Conditional Uses.
Comments: Suggest no change to R-3 Townhouse section.
Page 16-19 Code Book
1630.02& 1630.03 Permitted&Conditional Uses.
Comments: Suggest no change to R-4 Multiple Family.
Page 16-21 thru 16-25 Code Book
1635.02 Permitted Uses. Pages 16-21 thru 16-24
Comments: k - delete reference to drive-in banking facilities?
q - Does bus station imply maintenance?
s - Clarify drive-in vs drive thru?
vv - Simply state retail sales only?
.W - Clarify drive-in vs drive thru?
000 - Delete taxi stand?
1635.03 Conditional Uses. Page 16-25.
Comments: b - Clarify drive-in vs drive thru?
e - Delete churches?
j - Specify no outside storage to eliminate auto auctions,etc...?
o - Delete pool or billiard halls?
r - Add definition for arcade and impose regulation where a percentage(})of total sales
Must be derived from food. This would be to avoid establishment of a"pure"arcade.
s - Delete motorcycle sales?
Page 16-27 thru 16-28 Code Book
1640.02 Permitted Uses Light Industrial.
Comments: Add general statement regarding industries that may pose environmental concerns.
1640.03 Permitted Conditional Uses.
Comments: a - Delete due to environmental concerns?
c - Delete due to environmental concerns?
Page 16-29 Code Book `
1645.02 Permitt ed Uses Recreational Space.
Comments: No changes suggested.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 12, 1996
TO: Michael Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant
ITEM: Development of Property East of American Monarch;
37th and Silver Lake Road
Jerry Cowan provided a site plan for Staff's review. The following are items that the
owners of the property will have to address in order to develop this property as
conceptualized on the site plan.
1. Subdivision of Property: The owners will have to apply to the City for a
Public Hearing and approval regarding a subdivision of property of this site.
2. Rear Yard Set-Back Variance: As situated on the site plan, the proposed
building will require a 15' rear yard set-back variance because the NW corner
of the building will be on the property line. They are essentially requesting
a "O-lot line" for the proposed building.
3. Parkin : The parking spaces required were calculated based on the square
footage provided in the key on the site plan. It appears that they have
sufficient parking using this data. They are required to have 28 spaces for
the office; 11 spaces for the warehouse; for a total of 39 spaces required.
The key notes that they are proposing to have 42, 5'x19' parking spaces.
They will need to reconfigure the parking spaces so that they are 9'x19' as
required by the Ordinance.
Also, the site plan shows an additional 37 parking spaces just south of the
CP Railway property and truck bays that would have large trucks using the
railway property to access the loading areas situated on the backside of the
proposed building. The owners will need to make arrangements with the
the railway company for either purchasing the property or a,perpetual lease
agreement in order for the City Staff to recommend approval of their
parking plan.
4. Elevations: The City will need to see the elevations of this site or a
topographical map so that it can be determined that no ground cover is
removed from the water main that exists to the North of the building.
5. Drainage/Water Retention Plans: No drainage map or plan was provided to
Staff. The Rice Creek Watershed District will also need to be notified and
their application_process initiated and completed. Also, Staff was wondering
what impact the storm water run-off from the Apache Plaza would have on
this proposed site and what water retention requirements the RCWD would
propose for this area.
In reviewing the letter dated February 8, 1996 for the owners, they may be able to lease
the additional property for parking-from CP Railway.
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
id19b Went Trunk Highway 9
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Phone: 612/9374150
Fax 6121937-5622
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
DATE 02JI15/96
TO Mr. Mike Morrison
COMPANY City of St.Anthony Village
NUMBER 761-9323
FROM Jay Riggs '
REGARDING Silver Lake Center EAW
PROJECT NO 95338
Number of Pages including this cover letter IS
Please call(612)937-S160 9you do not reeelva all pages or experience difficulty receiving this transmittal
PURPOSE O As you requested 0 For your approval p Reply to sender
O For your information O As we disoussed 11 Other(see remarks)
REMARKS The DRAFT Response to Comments. Findings of Fact. Record of Decision
follows. Also attached is an exam le city council resolution:- Please review
these materials and let me know what chances we need to make. Call if you
have uestlonst
THE WFORMATION CONTAWF01N THIS PACSlM11E MESSAGE Is LEOALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
WDRD SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE PERSONS OR BNTTRFS NAMED ABOVE. If ARS NOT SUCH PERSONS OR
TRN
ENTrr Mr YOU ARS HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISTRIBUTION,DiSSEMiNA77ON OR REPRODUCTION OF THUS FACSIMILE
- MES8A0E 13 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAWRECEIVED THIS MESSAGE iN=OR,PLEA.St31MMADIATELY CAUL US
COLLECT AT(6111907.5150.
DRAFT
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS,
FINDINGS OF FACT, AND
RECORD OF DECISION
FOR THE
SILVER LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL
REDEVELOPMENT .:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSHEET (EAW)
FEBRUARY 1996
RGU PROPOSER
St. Anthony Village Ste. Marie Company
Attn.: Mr. Mike Momson, City Manager Attn.: Ms. Mary Rothchild
3301 Silver Lake Road First Bank Place
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699 601 Second Ave. South
(612) 789-8881 Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 973-2141
CONSULTANT
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
Attn.: Mr. Jay Riggs
14180 West Trunk Highway 5
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(612) 937-5150
To be considered by the City of St.Anthony Village City Council on February 27, 1996
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS,
FINDINGS OF FACT, AND
RECORD OF DECISION
FOR THE
SILVER LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT,
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)
FEBRUARY 1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................&,l ot............................1
RESPONSETO COMMENTS....................................................................................................1
EAW NOTIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND COMMENT PERIOD........................................1
COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSE...........................................................................1
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Timothy Fell, January 17, 1996.........................................1
Ramsey Soll and Water Conservation District, Tom Peterson, January 31, 1996...............1
Minnesota Historical Soclety, Britta Bloomberg, February 2, 1996......................................2
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Thomas W. Balcom, February 14, 1996.....2
Minnesota Department of Health, Kathy Svanda, February 14, 1996............................•••••2 -
FINDINGSOF FACT..................................................................................................................3
PROJECTDESCRIPTION.............................................:........................................................3
ProposedProject....................................................................................................I....,.......
Site Description and Existing Conditions.............................................................................4
CRITERIA USED IN DECIDING WHETHER THE PROJECT HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.........................................................................4
Type, Extent, and Reversibility Of Environmental Effects....................................................4
Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects..............................6
Extent to Which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mit1 gation..............................••••6
Extent to Which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled.........................6
RECORDOF DECISION............................................................................................................8
• . 11
DRAFT—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT,AND RECORD OF DECISION
SltVER NT
NTAI ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)
INTRODUCTION
The Ste. Marie Company(SMC) is proposing a phased redevelopment of Apache Plana in the City of St.
Anthony Village, Minnesota, An Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)was prepared pursuant to
Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 Subp. 14(B). The EAW,comments received on the EAW, and other pertinent
materials have been reviewed in accordance to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 in order to determine if the
proposed Project has the potential for significant environmental effects. The following includes responses
to all of the comments received by the City of St. Anthony Village(City),Findings of Fact supporting the
decision,.and the Record of Decision indicating an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not necessary
for this project.
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
EAW NOTIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION,AND COMMENT PERIOD
In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1500,the EAW was completed and distributed on January 10,
1996 to all persons and agencies on the official Environmental Quality Board(EQB)mailing list and other
interested parties. The notification was published in the,EQB Monitor on January 15, 1996,initiating the
30-day public comment period. The comment period ended on February 14, 1996.
COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSE
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Timothy Fell,January 17, 1996
The Corps confirmed that the project is not within the regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers.
,Response: So noted for the record ne project proposer and the RGU appreciate the Corps'
prompt response.
Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, Tom Peterson, January 31, 1996
The Ramsey SWCD stated that "based on the information contained in the EAW and discussions with
Ramsey County Public Works Personnel and Rice Creek Watershed District staff, it appears,with the
addition of four storm water management ponds,that the redevelopment plan may be an improvement
over current stomtwater management conditions at the site." SWCD staff recommended that the Rice
Creek Watershed District's ponding requirements be utilized for ponding design,and, if at all possible
and feasible,that the ponds be maximized to improve nutrient removal. The SWCD also stated that
soil erosion and sediment control during project construction will be critical.
Response: It is the Intent of the project proposers to minimize the short and long-term downstream'
water quality impacts associated with this project to the extent practicable. As stated in the EAW,
modeling results indicate the project will reduce peak runoff rates from the existing conditions for
both the Interim and ultimate redevelopment proposal. The results predict a 26 percent reduelion in
phosphorus runoff from the 54-acre tributary watershed(a small portion of the drainage area is
DRAFT—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION
4ILV9R LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPME
RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)NT C
F�
outside the subject property)following the construction of the first three ponds (Phase 1). The
inclusion of the fourth basin will result!n further stormwater discharge rate reductions and will
provide a 45 percent total reduction in phosphorus discharge relative to existing conditions. All
stormwater ponding will meet or exceed RCWD permitting standards.
Also stated in the EAW is the fact that all site grading and erosion control activities are subject to
!lice Creek Watershed District(RCWO)and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPD!~S)permits and will comply with pertinent requirements as described in the required Grading
and Erosion Control Plan which will likely incorporate multiple Best Management Practices(RMP).
Because the site lacks steep slopes and numerous BAs will be implemented, sfgniflcarst adverse
- impacts from eonstruedon-related sediment and erosion are not expected
Minnesota Historical Society, Britta Bloomberg, February 2, 1996
The Minnesota Historical Society indicated that the probability of unknown historical or araboological
properties being present on the site is low, and therefore the"no"response to question 26a is
appropriate.
Response: So noted for the record. The project proposer and the RGU appreciate confirmation of
the accuracy of the EAW with respect to Item 26a.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,Thomas W. Balcom, February 14, 1996
The DNR stated"we have no comments to offer on the project at this time. Preparation of an ETS is
not merited in our opinion."
Response: So noted for the record.
Minnesota Department of Health,Kathy Svande, Fe.bruary 14, 1996
The MDH
Response: So noted for the record
DRAFT—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION
ENVAI ON E NT
NTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)
FINDINGS OF FACT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposed Project
The Silver Lake Center Commercial Redevelopment involves redevelopment of Apache Plaza, and is
ultimately planned to include 306,600 s.f.of new/renovated retail space and four stormwater ponds.
Initiating in spring of 1996, Phase 1 will include partial demolition of the existing mall,construction of
a 75,200 s.f supermarket,development of two lots,and installation of three stormwater ponds. The
table below suarizes the proposed redevelopment.
mm
Development Summary
Building Acreage=Pa:rki�ng Pro osed Use Phase Area O f. x•
Cub Foods 1 75,200 9.23 553
Cub Foods Addition 2+ 12,600 OR 0
Home Improvement 2+ 74 000 11.40 300
Department Store 2+ SOW 7.48 400
Retail or Restaurant 1 7 500 1.14 59
Retail or Gas/ConvXar Wash 1 7,500 1.51 25
Retail 2+ 7,800 0.73 30
Video 2+ 7,000 1.08 77
Oil Change 2+ 4,000 1.10 29
Pet Supply 2+ 22,000 3.14 110
Liquor 2+ 9.000 0.89 55
New Market Lot ? 0 4.96 0
Stormwater Ponds A-C 1 0 1.09 0
Stormwater Pond D 2 0 2.41 0
Pond Landscaping 1-2+ 0 2.68 0
306,600 48.84' 1638
1
This use is proposed to occur within the 9.23-acre Cub Foods site.
2 Approximately 60,000 s.f.of the Department Store building includes renovation of existing
facilities.
3 Combine this lot acreage with the existing uses(First Bank,Taco Bell,and Tires Plus—
approximately 1,96 acres)to obtain the total site area of 50.8 acres.
Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 Subp. 14(B) state that the mandatory HAW threshold for"construction of
anew or expansion of an existing industrial,commercial,or institutional facility"in a fourth class city
is 200,000 square feet(s.f.). Because 60,000 s.f.of the proposed project is renovation of an exisiting
facility,this multi-phased project involves the construction of nrw commercial space totaling 246,600
s.£ This exceeds the mandatory HAW threshold by 46,600 s.f.
DRAFT—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT,AND RECORD OF DECISION
SILVER LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)
Site Description and Existing Conditions
The site is located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Township 30 North,Range 23 West;
Ramsey County, City of St. Anthony village, Minnesota. The site encompasses 50.8 acres and is
dominated by the Apache Plana building,parking lot,and associated buildings. An abandoned health
club is located directly north of the main Apache Plana building. Only approximately 142,400 s.f. of
pervious surfacc exists on the site,which predominantly includes an area of mowed grass along the
north-western portion of the property. A strip center called Apache New Market Plaza is located
southwest of the main mall building. In addition,a Tires Plus,Taco Bell,First Bank,and additional
paved parking areas are located along the Silver Lake Road frontage.
CRITERIA USED IN DECIDING WHETHER THE PROJECT HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Type,Extent, and Reversibility of Environmental Effects
According to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (A)the first factor that the City must consider is the
"type,extent,and reversibility of environmental effects." The City's findings are set forth below.
1. Project Site. The site is an existing mall with extremely limitod pervious area.A number of
"environmental conditions were observed on the site.In response to these observed conditions, a
number of additional studies were conducted. All of the environmental conditions have been,or
will be addressed adequately in accordance with MPCA standards.
2. )Fish,Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources. The proposed project will not have a
negative impact on habitat or natural resources. The proposed stormwater management practices
will likely improve habitat in Silver Lake.
3. Water Resources. No direct impacts to water resources are proposed.
4. Water Use.no site will be connected to the St.Anthony Village publio water supply. The
demand per day will be typical of retail/oommercial developments of this sort and is expected that
the quantity of water used will be approximately 32,232 gallons per day on a maximum potential
average daily basis. No adverse effects on public water supply are anticipated.
5. Water-related Land Use Management Districts. No Districts apply.
6. Soils. The site's soils are compatible for the proposed uses.
7. Erosion and Sedimentation. All site grading and erosion control activities are subject to Rice
Creek Watershed District(RCWD)and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES)permits and will comply with pertinent requirements as described in the required Grading
and Erosion Control Plan which will likely incorporate multiple Best Management Practices
(BMP). Because the site lacks steep slopes and BMPs will be implemented,significant adverse
impar,.ts from construction-related sediment and erosion are not expected.
Cl
DRAFT—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION
SILVER LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)
S. Water Quality-Surface Water Runoff. The project will reduce peak runoff rates from the
Wsting conditions. Modeling results predict a 26 percent reduction in phosphorus runoff from the
54-acre tributary watershed(a small portion of the drainage area is outside the subject property)
following the construction of the first three ponds (Phase 1). The inclusion of the fourth basin will
result in fiuther stormwater discharge rate reductions and will provide a 45 percent total reduction
in phosphorus discharge relative to existing conditions. All stormwater ponding will meet or
exceed RCWD permitting standards and significant negative impacts are not anticipated.
9. Water Quality-Wastewaters. Wastewater will be typical of developments of this sort and the
estimated maximum potential wastewater production is 31,963 gallons per day. No adverse
impacts on the sanitary sewer system are anticipated.
10. Ground Water-Potential for Contamination. Although some groundwater beneath the
southwest portion of the site is known to contain low levels of petroleum contaminants from an off-
site source,the proposed project is not expected to increase the potential for fhture releases of
contaminants that could impact groundwater below the site because(1) substantial site cleanup has
and will occur as a direct result of this redevelopment, (2)the majority of the site will be covered
by impervious surfaces,(3)the proposed underground storage tanks will be installed and monitored
in accordance with MPCA standards,and(4)all wastewater will be conveyed to the sanitary sewer
system.
11. Solid Wastes;Hazardous Wastes;Storage Tanks. It is anticipated that solid waste generation
will be typical of developments of this sort. The maximum potential solid waste generation for the
ultimate development will likely be in-the range of 1,000 to 1,500 tons per year. Source separation
will be encouraged by the St.Anthony Village for the restaurants and retail businesses to be
constructed on the site and these businesses will be expected to take advantage of recycling
programs to reduce costs for solid waste trucking and disposal. Three to five USTs may be
installed during site redevelopment. Appropriate measures to minimize:environmental risks
associated with solid wastes,hazardous wastes,and storage tanks are planned.
12. Traffic. The proposed project will have no significant impact on the signalized intersections near
the project or on the regional roadway system surrounding the project. The unsignalized
'intersection of Silver Lake Road and the northern site driveway will operate at a poor level of
service with Phase 1 or ultimate development if no mitigation is pursued. Signalization of this
intersection is currently under discussion by the city, and, if signalized,this intersection would
operate in the level B range.
13. Air Quality. No significant impacts are expected.
14. Adverse visual impacts. No significant visual nuisances are expected.
15. Compatibility with Plans. The proposed project is consistent with existing zoning and no
conflicts with adjacent land uses are anticipated.
1.
DRAFT—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION
SIi VER LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)
Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects
Accwding to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp.7 (B)the second factor the City must consider is the
"cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects." The City's findings are set forth
below.
As stated in the EAW,project proposers are not speculating about the ultimate development of the 4.96
am lot to be located in the southwest corner of the site(currently occupied by the New Market
building). Because 100 percent of this area is currently covered by impervious surface and all of this
area will be incorporated into the proposed stormwater mangement plan,no additional or cumulative
environmental impacts are anticipated.
Extent to Which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation
According to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (C)the third factor the City must consider is the
-extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory
authority." The City's findings are set forth below.
The following permits and approvals are required for this project:
Unit of Government Type of 622lication
St.Anthony ViUago Bu,ilding Permit
St. Anthony VWW Preliminary and Final Plat
St.Anthony Villa a Demolition Permit
St. Anthony VIII a ng Permit
St.Anthony Vill a Municipal Water Connection Permit
St. Anthon Vill a Parkin Lot License
St.Anthony Village Sani Sewer Connection Permit
St.Anthony Vill a Setback Variance for Cub Foods Store
MPCA NPDFS/General Storm Water Permit
MPCA UdEty Extension
MN Dept. of Health Water Main Extension
Rice Creek Watershed Djistrict_LGradirig and Stormwater Management
The City finds that the potential environmental effects of the project are subject to mitigation by
ongoing regulatory authorities and an EIS need not be prepared.
Extent to Which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled
According to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (D)the final factor the City must consider is the
"Went to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other
DRAFT.:RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION
GIt.VER LAKE CENTER COMMERCIAL
"RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SHEET(EAW)REDEVELOPMENT
B 0 K
E
environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer,or of ElS's previously
prepared on similar projects." The City's&dings are set forth below.
1. The proposed project is similar to other commercial redevelopment projects within Rrlly-developed
urban areas. Other projects of similar scope with similar stormwater mangy plans and
BWs generally reduce off-site environmental impacts relative to existing conditions.
2. 71te EAW currently contains or references all of the known studies that would likely provide
information or guidance regarding environmental effects which can be anticipated and controlled.
3. Because the proposed project only surpasses the mandatory EAW threshold by 46,600 square fi;et,
no EIS that addresses a similarly sized project was available.
4. JU City fords that the environmental effects of the project can be anticipated and controlled as a
result of environmental review and permitting processes for similar projects.
DST—RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION
IWRONME NT
NTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)
E
RECORD OF DECISION
Based on the EAW,the response to coanmeatL%and the Findings of Fact,the City of St Anthony Village,
the ROU for this environmental review.concludes the following.
1. The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act
and Minnesota Rules,Parts 44 10.1000 to 4410.1700(1993),
.-2. The EAW satisfactorily addressed all of the issues for which existing information could have been
reasonably obtained,
3. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules Part 4410.1700,the project does not have the
potential for significant environmental effects,
4. The City makes a"Negative Declaration,"and
S. An EIS is not required.
Resolution No
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
SILVER LAKE CENTER A,SSESSMENT WORKSHEET(EAW)T
VIR
ENONIVJNE
FINDING NO NEED FOR AN
ENVIRONMENTAL EWPAC'T STATEMENT(EIS)
WHEREAS,Minnesota Rules Part 4410.4300 Subp. 14(B)requires that an EAW be prepared for
construction of any commercial facility equal to or greater than 200,000 31, in a fourth class city;and
WHEREAS,Minnesota Rules Part 4410.1700 Subp. 9 requires that multiple phases be considered as a
single project;and
VMREAS,On January 10, 1996,an EAW was completed for a phased commercial redevelopment
project]mown as Silver Lake Center,which is ultimately planned to include 306,600 s.f, of new/rencvatod
retail space and would be located on the existing Apache Plaza site;and
WHEREAS,On January 10, 1996,copies of the EAW were distributed to all persons and agencies on the
official Environmental Quality Board(EQB)mailing list and other interested parties; and
VVMREAS,On January 15, 1996,the EAW was publicly noticed in the EQB Monitor,commencing the
30-day public comment period;and
WHEREAS,On January 24, 1996,a press release was published in the St. Anthony Bulletin announcing
the completion of the EAW,availability to interested parties,and process for submitting comments on the
EAW;and
WHEREAS,The 30-day comment period ended February 14, 1996 at 4;30 p.m. and the City of St.
Anthony Village continued to accept comments after the closing;and
WHEREAS,No negative comments were received during the public comment period.
02/15%96 16. 06
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minmaota RnvirO=Cn el Policy Act
and Minnesota Rules,Pens 4410.1000 to 4410.1700(1993),
2. The F.AW satisfactorily addressed all of the issues for which existing information could have been
reasonably obtained,
3. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules Part 4410.1700,the project does not have the
poteadal for significant environmenW effects,
4. The City makes a`Negative Declaration,"and
S. An EIS is not required.
Adopted by the City Council February 27, 1996
Mayor
A'TT'EST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by administration Approved as to form and execution
City Manwr City Attorney
1
IU.S.POS
.32J
iC/�iCJ � •.
macta h'-�rEn'E i.
3 437 s:
Minnesota Association of Community
Telecommunications Administrators
1711 West County Road B, Suite 30ON
Roseville, MN 55113-4036
Jerry Faust
Councilmember
3.131 si1ver Lake Rd
S,. Anthony, MA 55418-1699
Telecommunications Seminar
February 22, 1996
o : . . .
3 0
D -Nona
ANNUM
r
elf, , 3 CD O•
N Q. 5� M% 0 � �
�. �.
C
CD
D cD '1' Lam• �• h a
Q o 3,
AV
r- �C
0
1 .
In the next five years, much of the state's telecommunications Date Thursday, February 22, 1996
infrastructure will be rebuilt and modernized to provide ad-
vanced telecommunications services spurring economic devel-
opment. But many cities may be left out, or ignored by tele- Time 10:00 AM
communications providers and be placed at a disadvantage
when it comes to economic development, while other cities may
experience construction nightmares as multiple providers rush Location League of Minnesota Cities
to build their new systems. 145 University Avenue West
St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
Find out what you can do to prepare your city and take advan-
tage of these inevitable changes.
Program
10:00 to noon ♦ Seminar
♦ Public Rights of Way and Zoning
Who should attend: Mayors ♦ Economic Development
City Council Members ♦ Compensation and Community Television
City Managers ♦ Legislative Action ...
City Engineers Where do we go from here?
City Attorneys
Economic Development Lunch on your own
Managers
Afternoon lobbying at the legislature
Sponsored by: League of Minnesota Cities
and , Registration $15.00
MACTA (Minnesota
Association of Community
Telecommunications Register by calling
Administrators) the MACTA office at 612 635-0306 or
Flaherty & Koebele at 612 225-8840.
Please register by Monday, February 19.
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 JANUARY 9, 1996
4 I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL.
5 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor
6 Ranallo.
7 II. ROLL CALL.
8 Councilmembers Present: Ranallo, Marks, Enrooth, Wagner, and Faust.
9 Also Present: Michael Mornson, City Manager.
10 III. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 9, 1996 COUNCIL AGENDA.
I 1 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to approve the January 9, 1996 Council Agenda as
12 presented.
13
14 Motion carried unanimously.
15 IV. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 20, 1995 TRUTH IN TAXATION MEETING MINUTES.
16 Motion by Wagner, second by Marks to approve the December 20 , 1995 Truth in Taxation
17 Meeting minutes as presented.
18
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20 APPROVAL'OF THE DECEMBER 20, 1995 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES.
21 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to approve the December 20, 1995 Council Meeting with
22 the following changes:
23 Page 1, Line 29 add: Councilmember Enrooth withdrew his second.
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25 V. LICENSES/PERMITS/PETITIONS -None.
26
27 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
28 Motion by Marks, second by Wagner to approve the following claims:
29 A. American Bank in the amount of$40,511.25 for 93A GO Improvement Bond dated
30 8/1/93, in the amount of$24,155.00 for 1994B GO Improvement Bonds dated 6/1/94,
31 and in the amount of$41,538.75 for GO Improvement Bond dated 3/1/95.
32 B. Dorsey & Whitney in the amount of$1,956.10 for legal services rendered through
33 November 30, 1995.
34 C. 4 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
35 Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996
Page 2
1 VII. REPORTS.
2 A. Planning Commission - December 19. 1995.
3 1. Solid Rock Church. at Apache Plaza Conditional Use Permit.
4 Commissioner Makowske reported there were two items that were discussed at the
5 December 19, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. One was a concept review regarding
6 locating CUB Foods in Apache Plaza. The second was a conditional use permit request
7 from the Solid Rock Church. This request was to allow the Solid Rock Church to locate
8 in the Apache Mall across the corridor and north of Apache Wells Sports Bar and
9 Restaurant. Solid Rock Church is currently located in Elk River and desires to have a
10 branch closer to the City so more of its members would be able to attend the Saturday
11 night services. Makowske noted there are.four conditions necessary to grant a
12 conditional use permit. One condition is that the use must be compatible with other uses
13 in the area. The Planning Commission felt a church was not compatible to any of the
14 retail businesses that are currently doing business in Apache Plaza. The City Attorney
15 was also-of this opinion. Makowske reported the Planning Commission voted
16 unanimously to deny the application for the conditional use permit.
17 Terese Reiling, Welsh Companies, Inc., stated she had worked with the Solid Rock
18 Church to negotiate the lease term. She explained that Apache Plaza is currently 70%
19 vacant. Due to this and the possible redevelopment planned for Apache Plaza, First Bank
20 considered entering into a short term lease. She explained the Solid Rock Church is
21 currently located in Elk River and is interested in the possibility of eventually purchasing
22 a building in the community for a long term basis. She stated a short term lease would
23 afford First Bank some minor economic relief while they work on the redevelopment
24 project. She stated she did not feel a precedent would be set as it was rare that a property
25 would reach the level of degradation that Apache Plaza has reached. Within one year,the
26 center was likely to have only five tenants left.
27 Mayor Ranallo stated if the Church were allowed as a compatible use the City would not
28 be able to support the non-compatibility issue if an undesirable business asked to locate
29 in the center.
30 Ms: Reiling stated it would not be in First Bank's best interest to bring forth a situation
31 that would negatively affect the other tenants in the center. The church will be taking a
32 degraded space and repairing it because they have the capitol and are looking for a short
33 term lease. Most businesses would not be able to afford to do this.
34 Assistant Pastor Bill King, Solid Rock Church stated the church has been located in Elk
35 River for 25 years. He noted he realized the City was fair minded and would give due
36 consideration to the application as well as to the entire City's interest. He was pleased to
37 hear the objection raised to the conditional use permit was singular in nature. He stated
38 he felt he could satisfy the concerns regarding the single objection. He felt the church
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996
Page 3
1 could co-exist with the retail occupants of the center. The church will only be used once
2 per week and would in no way affect the adjacent businesses. He stated the church
3 believes that by occupying the space in the center, they will benefit the community. It
4 would be an advantage to the City of St. Anthony to approve the proposal because when
5 people have a spiritual anchor established in their life it creates a better City and combats
6 the general decline in morals seen in every community. The Solid Rock Church wants to
7 be a positive influence to minor children, youth and adults. Another advantage to the
8 City would be that people would go to the service stations and restaurants before or after
9 church services. In the event the Solid Rock Church failed to meet the conditions of the
10 conditional use permit,the City Council would have the right to revoke the permit.
11 Mr. Dave Hughes stated he attends Saturday evening services and is a business man who
12 has working in the City of St. Anthony for 25 years. He noted the conditional use permit
13 did specifically state a church was an acceptable, compatible use. The conditional use
14 permit also gives the City Council the right to determine if other non-named businesses
15 would or would not be compatible. He stated he did not believe X-rated businesses were
16 listed as compatible and would be left to the discretion of the City Council.
17 Mayor Ranallo cited a previous situation when the Little Sisters of Guadelupe asked to
18 locate,a bingo hall in Apache Plaza. The City Council determined this was not a
19 compatible use,just as church services are not compatible with retail. Mayor Ranallo
20 stated he did not feel it appropriate to set a precedent and not be able to deny other
21 -requests that may arise.
22 Ms. Reiling stated First Bank and Welsh Co. had to approve any business which would
23 apply fora lease in the center. She stated there is a lot of screening which takes place
24 before they will even bring a lease before the Planning Commission. She stated this will
25 probably be the last lease they will do for Apache Plaza due to the proposed
26 redevelopment. There is no longevity and no one is interested in leasing under those
27 terns.
28 Councilmember Faust noted the City Council has to look at the long terms affect to the
29 City.
30 Ms. Reiling stated she understood the concern of setting a precedent but felt the situation
31 is so unique because it is so short term in nature.
32 Councilmember Wagner noted the precedent applies to the entire City, not just to Apache
33 Plaza.
34 Councilmember Marks stated the conditional use permit allows a use to be considered
35 individually for each application. Approval is only given for a specific situation. This
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996 `
Page 4
1 would limit the amount of precedent as such. He stated he had a hard time seeing this as
2 establishing a precedent.
3 Councilmember Enrooth asked if the Council would consider the request if it was for a
4 different location such as a different shopping center, the medical center, etc.
5 Mayor Ranallo noted the Edison Hockey team had been denied by the City Council when
6 they requested to put a bingo hall in the St. Anthony Shopping Center.
7 Marks noted it appeared the specific location was the problem. He suggested if the
8 conditional use permit were denied, the ordinance should be considered because it
9 appears there is a consensus that a church is not an appropriate use for a commercial
10 property. He asked if the City Manager was aware of other churches being located in
11 shopping centers.
12 City Manager Mornson stated he was not. He also noted he was not aware of any other
13 cities who listed a church as a conditional use in a commercial area. He also noted the
14 comments in the letter received from William Soth, City Attorney.
15 Mr. Hughes stated he had experienced the unique opportunity of observing a similar
16 situation in Cleveland,Tennessee. A shopping center of smaller square footage, located
17 two blocks from town,with a similar rent situation and similar capacity of tenants rented
18 space to a church called Embassy Christian Center. The center was revitalized within
19 two years. He stated he did not feel the Solid Rock Church would have an adverse affect
20 on Apache Plaza.
21 Enrooth stated the City of St. Anthony would gladly welcome the Solid Rock Church into
22 the community but in a different location.
23 Marks questioned what specifically makes a church incompatible in a commercial area.
24 Morrison noted three business owners have contacted the City stating they felt this would
25 drop the value of their business. They feel it is not good in the long term.
26 Commissioner Makowske stated retail thrives best on a particular mix of different types
27 of retail settings. A church does not provide the same set of mind.
28 Motion by Marks to approve the application for a conditional use permit for the Solid
29 Rock Church.
30 Motion died due to lack of a second.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996
Page 5
1 Motion by Faust, second by Mayor Ranallo to deny the application for a conditional use
2 permit for the Solid Rock Church based on the fact that it is not believed to be a
3 compatible use in a commercial zone and that the ordinance be reviewed to determine if a
4 church should be included as a conditional use in a commercial zone.
5 Voting on the motion:
6 Aye: Ranallo, Enrooth, Faust, Wagner
7 Nay: Marks
8 The motion carried.
9 B. Mayor,
10 Mayor Ranallo had no report.
11 C. Council
_ 12 There was no report from Councilmembers.
13
14 D. Ci , Manager.
15 City Manager Mornson reported the public hearing for vacation of the easement
16 necessary for the Nedegaard Twin Homes is scheduled for January 23, 1996.
17 Mornson reported the positions for warming house attendants have been filled and all
18 warming houses.are open.
19 Mornson stated the issues involving the house at 3111 Silver Lake Road have come to a
20 closure. The closing will be in two weeks and the developer will be giving the City a
21 check plus 8% interest charged from the day of the purchase agreement of March 28,
22 1995.
23 Mayor Ranallo asked if the permit for occupancy would be issued before the outside of
24 the house is completed. He also noted other homes who had been occupied before the
25 lawn was completed. Mornson stated these issues would be addressed in either the
26 purchase agreement, the developer agreement or the contract for deed.
27 Mornson reported he had met collectively with Lauderdale and Falcon Heights
28 Administrators and independently to discuss contract needs. Chief Engstrom, Finance
29 Director Larson and City Manager will work on the figures and present them at the next
30 work session.
31 Mornson reported that Opus has submitted an EAW to the Environmental Quality Board.
32 He stated Public Works Director Hamer, Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes, City
33 Manager Mornson and Planning Commissioner Bergstrom have all reviewed the EAW.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996
Page 6
1 A letter is attached to the EAW from the Rice Creek Watershed District stating that the
2 ponding meets the current requirements. Mornson reported he had met with Mary
3 Rothschild and they have submitted an application for a variance, sub-division approval
4 and sign package. He noted there may be a special Planning Commission meeting to
5 review the issues on January 30, 1996 and the City Council will consider the issues at
6 their February 13, 1996 meeting.
7 VIII. PUBLIC HEARING - None.
8 IX. NEW BUSINESS .
9 A. Set Board of Review Date,
10 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to set the Board of Review date for the City of St.
11 Anthony for April 9, 1996 at 6:30 p.m..
12 Motion carried unanimously.
13 B. Resolution 96-001. re: Mayor Pro Tem for 1996.
14 Motion by Faust, second by Marks to adopt Resolution 96-001, regarding designating
15 Councilmember Richard Enrooth Mayor Pro Tern for the calendar year 1996.
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17 C. Resolution 96-002. re: Financial Transactions.
18 Motion by Marks, second by Wagner to adopt Resolution 96-002, regarding specifying
19 persons authorized to make certain transactions regarding City financial accounts.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 D. Resolution 96-003 re: Legal Newspaper,
22 Motion by Mayor Ranallo, second by Enrooth to adopt Resolution 96-003, regarding
23 designating Lillie Suburban Newspaper as the legal newspaper for the calendar year
24 1996.
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26 E. Resolution 96-004. re: Petitions for Public Improvements.
27 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to adopt Resolution 96-004, regarding establishing
28 March 15, 1996 as cut-off date for receiving petitions for public improvements.
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30 F. Resolution 96-005. re: Official Depository.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996 `
Page 7
1 Motion by Wagner, second by Marks to adopt Resolution 96-005, regarding designating
2 Firstar St. Anthony Bank as the official depository for City funds.
3
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5 G. Resolution 96-006: re: Public Health Officer.
6 Motion by Marks, second by Wagner to adopt Resolution 96-006, regarding designating
7 Dr. William Carr as the Public Health Officer.
8 Dr. Carr asked the City Council to examine what his duties should be for the coming
9 year. He stated he was glad to be on call for the City of St. Anthony.
10 Mayor Ranallo thanked Dr. Carr for his forty years of service as the Public Health
11 Officer.
12 Motion carried unanimously.
13 H. Resolutions 96-007 through 96-011. re: Mayor and Councilmembers Outside
14 Organizations,
15 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to adopt Resolutions 96-007 through 96-011,
16 regarding acknowledging Mayor and Councilmembers as participants in outside
17 organizations.
18 Marks suggested one of the Councilmembers should be a participant in the Northwest
19 Youth Services.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 I. ,Resolution 96-012.re: Hennepin County Municipal Recycling Grant Application,
22 Motion by Enrooth, second by Wagner to adopt Resolution 96-012,regarding approving
23 submittal of the 1996 Hennepin County Municipal Recycling Grant Application.
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25 J. Resolution 96-013, re: No Smoking Policy_
26 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to adopt Resolution 96-013, regarding approving a
27 non-smoking policy for the new City-owned Community Center facility.
28 Motion carried unanimously.
29 X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996 `
Page 8
1 XI. INTERVIEW AND APPOINT PLANNING COMMISSIONERS.
2 A. Robin Bednarz
3 Mayor Ranallo outlined the time commitment and terms of the Planning Commission
4 position.
5 Wagner asked Ms. Bednarz why she wanted to be a Planning Commission member.
6 Ms. Bednarz stated she felt this was an excellent time to be a member of the Planning
7 Commission with all the things happening at Apache Plaza. She indicated her family had
8 made a significant investment in their home and plan to be in the City for a long time.
9 She views the commitment as good for the community, family and property value. She
10 stated she is not currently in the workforce and has time available. She has the full
11 support of her husband. She.stated she has been to Planning Commission meetings and
12 understands the time commitment involved. She stated she has a legalistic mind and in
13 her former employment position worked 40-50% with construction attorneys. She
14 understand that no decision can be made lightly. She stated this position would fit well
15 into her schedule and she thinks people are obligated to give something to their
16 community. She noted a lot of people only attend meetings when there is an issue that is
17 of special interest to them.
18 Ranallo asked how long she had lived in the City of St. Anthony.
19 Ms. Bednarz stated she had lived in the City of St. Anthony for one and a half years.
20 Faust asked Ms. Bednarz to explain in one word her best attribute.
21 Ms. Bednarz stated it was common sense.
22 Marks asked Ms. Bednarz what she would do if she identified a conflict of interest with
23 an issue.
24 Ms. Bednarz stated she did not foresee this as a problem because she was not coming to
25 the Commission as a result of any special interests. She stated she couldn't think of any
26 conflicts of interest but if she perceived there was a conflict, she would ask Mayor
27 Ranallo or City Manager for advice on how to handle the situation. If there was a conflict
28 she would state this and would refrain from voting on the issue.
29 Marks asked Ms. Bednarz to comment on her vision for the City of St. Anthony.
30 Ms. Bednarz stated she felt there was a lot of work which could and should be done in the
31 economic development of the City. She felt the Planning Commission should be pro-
32 active in the development of property and work with the realtors and marketing people.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 9, 1996 `
Page 9
1 She stated if there are no commercial businesses everyone pays. She also would
2 investigate how the parks in St. Anthony could be better utilized.
3 Ms. Bednarz added that she has a good mix of experience from working with public
4 agencies, government and the private sector. She felt her background was a strong asset.
5 B. John Delmonico
6 Mayor Ranallo outlined the time commitment and terms of the Planning Commission
7 position.
8 Enrooth asked Mr. Delmonico what he felt were the challenges and opportunities the City
9 of St. Anthony faces in the next couple years.
10 Mr. Delmonico stated he believed in being involved with the community to make a
11 difference. He noted Apache Plaza, the trailer park,residential projects,the industrial
12 park, families and the St. Anthony Shopping Center would all be big issues in the coming
13 years.
14 Marks asked Mr. Delmonico what he would do if faced with a conflict of interest.
15 Mr. Delmonico stated he would abstain from being involved in the vote so it would not
16 appear that he was influenced by a personal interest. He stated he has been a-homeowner
17 on 27th Avenue for 17 years and other than that had no financial-interests in the City.
18 Faust asked Mr. Delmonico what one word described his best attribute.
19 Mr. Delmonico stated he felt it was thoroughness. He stated he feels this.is the reason he
20 has been promoted to the Minneapolis Robbery and Homicide Unit.
21 Wagner asked Mr. Delmonico why he wanted to be a member of the Planning
22 Commission.
23 Mr. Delmonico stated he had started working for Sroga Automotive in 1973 when he was
24 still attending high school. He served on the St. Anthony Fire Department from 1977 to
25 1988 and has always liked St. Anthony. He stated he grew up on 32nd Avenue and
26 Cleveland. He reported that three to four years ago he had approached Tom Burt, the
27 City Manager with an interest in being a Planning Commission member but was
28 discouraged as he was at that time working night hours. Presently, he is working straight
29 day hours with four weeks a year on the night shift. He is older now and will probably
30 live here the rest of his life and he cares about the future of St. Anthony. He stated he has
31 no children and time is not a problem. He stated if the Council does appoint him to the
32 Planning Commission they will be proud down the line that they made that decision.
City Council Regular Meeting.Minutes
January 9, 1996 `
Page 10
1 C. Discussion
2 Mayor Ranallo noted there were two openings for the Planning Commission.
3 Commissioner George Thompson was up for re-appointment and still desired to serve.
4 Motion by Mayor Ranallo, second by Enrooth to reappoint George Thompson to the
5 Planning Commission.
6 Motion carried unanimously.
7
8 There was discussion about the two candidates for the Commission. Mayor Ranallo
9 noted Mr. Delmonico had lived on 27th Avenue for 17 years and has a vested interest in
10 the City. Marks noted they were both very strong people and both had a lot of strength in
11 different areas. He also noted Mr. Delmonico was very familiar with the City. Mayor
12 Ranallo noted it would be good to have representation from the 27th Avenue area. Faust
13 noted he'felt the female perspective was important.
14 Motion by Enrooth, second by Wagner to appoint John C. Delmonico to the Planning
15 Commission.
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17
18 XII. ADJOURNMENT.
19 Motion by Enrooth, second by Marks to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 P.M.
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21 Respectfully submitted,
22 Lorri Kopischke
23 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
24
25 Mayor
26 ATTEST:
27 City Clerk