HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKETS 06151999 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
101497
Box: 20
Folder: PL PACKETS 1999
Document: PL PACKETS 06151999
r r
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 15, 1999
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. APPROVAL OF JUNE 15, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA.
IV. APPROVAL OF MAY 18, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
V. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE JUNE 221 1999 CITY COUNCIL
VI. PUBLIC HEARING - NONE.
VII. CONCEPT REVIEW - NONE.
VIII. OTHER BUSINESS.
1. DICK KRIER REPORT AND DISCUSSION ON ST. ANTHONY SHOPPING CENTER.
Z.' REVIEW PROPOSED PARK DEDICATION ORDINANCE.
A. COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES -
3. SALVATION ARMY CAMP UPDATE & DISCUSSION.
4. 1999 GOALS DISCUSSION.
IX. COMMENTS.
X. ADJOURNMENT.
n w
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
4 MAY 18, 1999
5
6
7 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
8 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Chair
9 Bergstrom.
10
11 H. ROLL CALL.
12 Commissioners present: Chair Bergstrom; Commissioners Horst, Hanson, Stille, Melsha,
13 Hatch, and Tillman.
14 Commissioners absent: None.
15 Also present: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant.
16
17
18 III. APPROVAL OF MAY 18, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA.
19 Motion by Horst, second by Stille to approve the May 18, 1999 Planning Commission Meeting
20 Agenda with the following change:
21
22 New VI. Election of Planning Commission Vice-Chair
23
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25
26 IV. APPROVAL OF MARCH 16, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
27 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Hanson to approve the March 16, 1999 Planning Commission
28 Meeting Minutes as presented.
29
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31
32 V. DESIGNATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CITY
33 COUNCIL.
34 Stille agreed to attend the May 25, 1999 City Council meeting.
35
36 VI. ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION VICE-CHAIR.
37 Bergstrom nominated Horst for the Vice-Chair post. The nomination was seconded by Hanson.
38
39 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Stille to close nominations for Planning Commission Vice-
40 Chair.
41
42 Motion carried unanimously.
43
44 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Hanson to elect Dick Horst as Planning Commission Vice-
45 Chair.
46
47 Motion carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 2
1
2 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
3 A. 99-02 Sunset Memorial Cemetery, Sideyard Variance for Sidewalk around Mausoleum.
4 Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:07 PM.
5
6 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that representatives from Sunset Memorial Park, Ted Dickman and
7 Dennis Bridges, are requesting a five-foot variance to allow Sunset to construct a five-foot
8 sidewalk in the setbacks on the northeast and northwest sides of the recently constructed
9 mausoleum. Staff had noted the lack of sidewalks when the original plans were reviewed with
10 the architect and construction company representatives. At the time, the representatives
11 indicated that sidewalks would not be necessary because the grounds of the mausoleum were
12 going to be sodded.
13
14 As Mr. Dirkman stated in his application letter, he was under the impression that these sidewalks
15 had been planned for and approved at the original approval process. In meeting with.Staff; he
16 was surprised to learn that sidewalks had not been planed for all around the building. Mr.
17 Dirkman states in his application letter that having no sidewalks makes it very difficult to clear
18 the area of snow and ice in the winter, it can be muddy in the spring or after a rain, and it
19 becomes a safety issue for employees interring caskets into exterior vaults located higher up in
20 the mausoleum.
21
22 This variance request would not alter the essential character of the area and strict enforcement
23 would cause undue hardship to employees in the performance of their job and to those people
24 visiting the mausoleum. As such,this property could not be put to a reasonable use without the
25 variance because the nature of a mausoleum requires most visitors to be outside. Economic
26 considerations do not appear to be an issue with this variance application.
27
28 Bergstrom welcomed Dennis Bridges and invited him to address the Commission. Mr. Bridges
29 stated the building permit process was not completed correctly and no provision was made for
30 -sidewalks which are necessary for the operation of an hydraulic lift which lifts.caskets up to 18
31 feet in the air and weights in excess of 1,000 pounds. He stated the lack of a sidewalk presents
32 accessibility problems for families visiting the mausoleum.
33
34 Stille asked whether the facility could have been built on the site with proper setbacks if the
35 owners had originally tried. Mr. Bridges stated that it was anticipated that the 5'-foot setbacks
36 included a sidewalk.
37
38 Horst asked whether the owners had been under the impression that sidewalks were not part of
39 the structure and therefore not subject to the ordinance. Mr. Bridges confirmed this, stating that
40 some municipalities do not consider this an encroachment. He added that much consideration
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 3
1 was given to the design of the structure, which incorporates architectural elements of an
2 amphitheater previously located on the site.
3
4 Hanson asked for an approximate distance between the proposed sidewalk and the sidewalk on
5 St. Anthony Boulevard. Mr. Bridges estimated a vertical distance of 15 feet.
6
7 Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:16 PM.
8
9 Bergstrom stated the Sunset Park had a concept review recently and the issue presented no
10 particular concern to him. Hatch asked whether a heavy snowfall would affect the structure as it
11 relates to city ploughing. Bergstrom stated this was not the case due to the slope.
12
13 Horst stated the hardship is the apparent danger to employees,heavy equipment access, and the
14 inconvenience to families. He expressed understanding that there was some question in the
15 original plans as to whether sidewalk would be considered part of the structure.
16
17 Motion by Horst, second by Bergstrom to approve a five-foot variance to allow for construction
18 of a five-foot wide sidewalk in the setbacks on the northeast and northwest sides of the
19 mausoleum as this does not alter the essential character of the area and strict enforcement would
20 cause undue hardship.
21
22 Motion carried unanimously.
23
24 Bergstrom stated the Commission would make its recommendation to the City Council at their
25 May 25, 1999 regular meeting and encouraged representatives from Sunset Memorial Park to be
26 in attendance.
27
28 B. 99-03 Dave Sperry,4004 Fordham Drive Lot Width and Lot Area Variance Requests.
29 Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:19 PM.
30
31 . Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Arvid and Eleanor Johnson, owners of 4008 Fordham Drive,
32 recently filed a lot split and replat with Ramsey County that had been approved by the City
33 Council twelve years ago. They had delayed this filing because they felt that they would be
34 adversely affected by property taxes and they were not ready to sell the resultant vacant parcel.
35 Staff called the property offices in Ramsey County and verified that they had recorded the lot
36 split and replat.
37
38 Mr. and Mrs. David Sperry, currently residing in New Brighton,have a tentative purchase
39 agreement with the Johnson's,to purchase the lot that was resultant from the split of 4008
40 Fordham Drive. Mr. and Mrs. Sperry would like to build a$130,000 home for themselves on
41 this vacant lot but would like to have the variances approved before they close on this property.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 4
1 Staff has advised their that they also need to be aware of the setbacks and lot coverage
2 restrictions for this zoning district. As their letter indicates, they are aware of the need to address
3 those issues without requesting additional variances.
4
5 The lot in question is 60 feet wide and its area is 7,985 square feet and as such, not considered a
6 buildable residential lot according to City Ordinance. The Ordinance states that a residential lot
7 in the R-1 Zoning District must be at minimum 75 feet wide and an interior lot must be not less
8 than 9,000 square feet. The Sperrys are asking for a lot width variance of 15 feet and a lot area
9 variance of 1,015 square feet.
10
11 In granting the variance, the essential character of the neighborhood would not be altered and
12 would be in keeping with the intention and spirit of the Zoning Code. It is also possible that this
13 lot can not be put to reasonable use without these variances.
14
15 Mr. and Mrs. Sperry contend that there is a hardship in that the owner did not create this situation
16 and that the Council had approved this lot split in September 1985.
17
18 Horst asked whether the Ordinance regarding minimum lot size was written prior to 1985 when
19 the Johnson's original lot split was approved. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated the Ordinance was
20 written in 1978 when many 60-foot wide lots existed and the City wanted to set new tone for
21 available vacant property.
22
23 Stille asked how old the community was, and when the plat was originally filed. The Johnson's
24 confirmed their house was built in'1963 and was one of the first on the block.
25
26 Melsha noted a question had been raised with regard to storm water issues in that neighborhood
27 and a building moratorium which had been imposed. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that moratorium
28 was no longer in effect.
29
30 Bergstrom invited the Johnson's and Sperry's to address the Council. Mr. Sperry presented
31 plans for his proposed home, adding the home fits in with the style of homes in the neighborhood
32 and falls within the 35% lot coverage.
33
34 Tillman noted a petition signed by neighbors in support of the request, and asked whether all
35 surrounding neighbors were included on the petition. The Johnson's confirmed that all the
36 surrounding neighbors have signed the petition.
37
38 Bob Graham, 4020 Fordham Drive, expressed concern over flooding issues in the neighborhood
39 which the City has done nothing to rectify after promising to address them before any
40 construction could commence. He requested that the City understand that continued deviation
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 5
1 from its policy by the continued issuance of such variances affects other resident's rights in
2 regard to storm sewers and flooding.
3
4 Horst asked whether Mr. Graham believes that the addition of a new home on the resultant lot
5 would mean less impervious surface and cause more run-off. Graham stated that none of the
6 neighbors know what it will take to cause flooding, but every inch of water is of concern. Horst
7 stated that he was unaware that area was under consideration for flood correction. Ms. Moore-
8 Sykes stated this area is still part of the overall plan for flood relief in the City.
9
10 Keith Gordon, 4012 Fordham Drive, expressed support of the Johnson's planned lot split, stating
11 he has'been their neighbor for 30 years and is a civil engineer. He added he had done some
12 calculations and noted that flood problems in the neighborhood would not be caused by this new
13 construction but because the Silver Lake Road watermain is undersized to handle flooding from
14 major storms. He noted that constructing 1 home is insignificant in terms of water added to the
15 storm sewer system.
16
17 Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:38 PM.
19 Horst stated that in his opinion the City would not have approved the lot split in 1985 without
20 also approving of the intention to put a home on the resultant lot. He added the request is in
21 keeping with the current goals of the City, including the improvement of housing stock and
22 increased tax revenues.
23
24 Horst expressed his support of the request, stating the only negative aspect of the request is the
25 creation of a less than ideal-sized lot, although no further variances would be required and there
26 is strong neighborhood support.
27
28 Hanson expressed concern that a precedent would be set for lot size, adding the Ordinance
29 pertaining to lot size might need to be revisited. He added the lot in question is a beautiful treed
. 30 lot and could present a potential flood situation. Bergstrom stated a precedent has already been
31 set and where appropriate the City is willing to consider and approve such requests.
32
33 Stille stated the hardship issue is not caused by the Johnson's who obviously did their homework
34 when they purchased the lot.
35
36 Motion by Horst, second by Bergstrom to approve the lot width and lot area variance requests for
37 4004 Fordham Drive as it would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and is in
38 keeping with the intention and spirit of the Zoning Code.
39
40 Motion carried unanimously.
41
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes.
May 18, 1999
Page 6
1 Bergstrom stated the Commission would make its recommendation to the City Council at their
2 May 25, 1999 regular meeting and encouraged the Sperry'.s and Johnson's to be in attendance.
3
4 C. 99-05 Coppo Partners, 2837 Anthony Lane South, Rear Yard Variance.
5 Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:51 PM.
6
7 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Mr. Geoffrey Benedict of Vanguard Construction, Inc., and as agent
8 for Coppo Partners, 2837 Anthony Lane, has submitted a request for a rear yard variance in order
9 to construct a proposed addition. The current principal structure already sits five feet into the
10 rear yard setback. The proposed addition is planned to be constructed along the same line as the
11 rear of the existing building and as such requires a five-foot variance to the City's rear yard
12 setback ordinance for industrial properties.
13
14 The proposed 200 foot by 84 foot addition will be constructed on the northeast side of the current
15 principal structure and will provide an additional 16,800 square feet of warehouse. The proposed
16 addition will also allow for the construction of four additional loading docks. As the site plan
17 indicates, the owners intend to also reconfigure the layout of the parking area to allow for an
18 additional curbcut, drive and parking stalls. If their request for a variance is approved, they will
19 be required to install additional parking spaces. By ordinance they are required to install 32
20 parking spaces and the site plan indicates they will provide 38 parking spaces.
21
22 Staff researched the file to determine if a variance was granted for the existing structure and
23 found that the original building was constructed in 1972,which was before the Zoning Code was
24 codified. With this being the situation, there was no variance required in 1972 because the
25 building is considered "grandfathered" in.
26
27 Staff received no comments regarding this variance request.
28
29 Bergstrom invited Mr. Geoffrey Benedict to address the Commission. Mr. Benedict stated he
30 represents Coppo Partners who own the operating companies that occupy the existing building.
31 He added the owners have a need for more warehouse space, docks and additional parking to
32 carry out their business.
33
34 Horst asked what was the type of business in which the owners are involved. Mr. Benedict
35 stated the structure is a warehouse distribution facility for automotive specialty adhesives. Horst
36 noted that the petition for variance was not entirely completed. Mr. Benedict noted that an
37 economic hardship would exist if the owners were not permitted to build the addition.
38
39 Tillman asked whether the addition could be moved in 5 feet. Ms. Moore-Sykes noted the
40 variance is for the existing building as well. Bergstrom asked what would be the structural
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 7
1 effects if the addition were moved in 5 feet. Mr. Benedict stated that debris would accumulate
. 2 and maintenance issues would arise.
3
4 Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:56 PM.
5
6 Bergstrom stated that the eastern edge of the site is a fence and a steep slope of 6 or 8 feet, so
7 topography must be considered.
8
9 Horst stated a hardship must be identified, which might be the fact that since the structure is
10 grandfathered in, a variance would have to be obtained on the entire building. He added that it is
11 to the City's advantage to encourage its businesscs to expand and grow, and to promote the
12 revitalization of the industrial park.
13
14 Hatch asked whether any additional City services would be required for the larger structure. Mr.
15 Benedict stated the required services would not change.
16
17 Stille stated a hardship issue might be potential drainage problems and maintenance issues.
18
19 Hatch asked how parking would be accommodated when the new docks were constructed. Mr.
20 Benedict stated the 2 existing docks would be abandoned and parking spaces put in that spot
21 while the new docks would not have parking in front of them. He added this will account for the
22 additional required parking.
23
24 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Horst to approve the rear yard variance request submitted by
25 Coppo Partners as 1) the topography with respective drainage is a significant consideration and
26 unique to that property; 2)the proposed construction is consistent with the existing building
27 constructed prior to City Code enactment; 3) a hardship is caused by the setback ordinance; 4)
28 the existing building requires a setback variance regardless of the proposed addition; and 5)the
29 proposed construction is consistent with the redevelopment of the City.
30
31 Drainage measures must be installed to decrease potential stormwater damage and approved by
32 the Public Works Director prior to construction.
33
34 Motion carried unanimously.
35
36 Bergstrom stated the Commission would make its recommendation to the City Council at their
37 May 25, 1999 regular meeting and encouraged the a representative from Coppo Partners to be in
38 attendance.
39
40 VIII. CONCEPT REVIEW-None.
41
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 8
1 IX. OTHER BUSINESS.
2 1. Report from the Council Liaison.
3 Ms. Moore-Sykes noted that Councilmember Faust was unable to attend the meeting due to
4 another commitment.
5
6 Horst stated that he understood Councilmember Faust would attend quarterly or as required.
7 Bergstrom agreed, stating a Council representative could be requested as needed.
8
9 2. Report from the Parks Commission.
10 Ms. Moore-Sykes noted that no Parks Commissioner was present.
11 --
12 Bergstrom noted that the Parks Commission had originally been charged with reporting through
13 the Planning Commission to the City Council, although recently they have reported directly to
14 the Council. He stressed that while the Parks Commission's report is interesting to the Planning
15 Commission it may be unnecessary and places a burden on Parks Commissioners to"attend
16 Planning Commission meetings.
17
18 Ms. Moore-Sykes agreed, stating the Planning Commission could continue to receive Parks
19 Commission meeting minutes. Tillman stated that seems sufficient.
20
21 Bergstrom noted that the Parks Commission was directed by the Council to report to the
22 Planning Commission, adding that the Council would need to undo that arrangement. He
23 requested feedback from the Parks Commission on this issue. Ms. Moore-Sykes agreed to
24 present this issue to Staff and the Council.
25
26 3. Discussion of a Special Project.
27 Bergstrom reviewed Richard Krier's St. Anthony Shopping Center redevelopment project for the
28 benefit of the new Commissioners, stating Mr. Krier had arrived at the conclusion that the
29 shopping center could be a viable retail area with some modifications or upgrades. He added Mr.
30 Krier is currently involved in determining what structural or promotional modifications might be
31 effective.
32
33 Bergstrom stated Mr. Krier would be present to discuss his land use plan at the Commission's
34 June meeting. Ms. Moore-Sykes encouraged the Commissioners to write their comments
35 regarding the land use plan on the posters provided by Mr. Krier for that purpose. Bergstrom
36 requested that the new Commissioners receive a copy of Mr. Krier's original report.
37
38 X. CONEVIENTS.
39 Bergstrom welcomed the new Commissioners and thanked them for their participation. H_e
40 invited them to introduce themselves and provide some background.
41
. f
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 9
1 Hatch stated he has worked with regional government in.California and his wife is a City Planner
2 for Shoreview,through whom he has gained an interest in planning and ideas for community
3 development. He added he is very interested in the redevelopment of the shopping center. He
4 expressed a desire to offer something unique and be of service to the community.
5
6 Tillman stated she saw the Commission openings in the local paper and was interested in getting
7 involved, stressing the importance of community involvement.
8
9 Melsha stated.he wanted to become.involved in the Village and expressed his pleasure at finding
10 that the Council and Commission are working on exciting issues such as the redevelopment of
11 the shopping center.
12
13 Bergstrom stated that government training services will conduct planning training for the new
14 Commissioners and other interested participants on site, and thanked Ms. Moore-Sykes for
15 arranging the sessions. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated the training will consist of 3 - 2 hour sessions on
16 May 24 and 26 and June 2, 1999. She stressed that anyone interested in the training is welcome
17 to attend. She noted that the May 24 and June 2 sessions will be held in the conference room
18 while the May 26 session will be held in the employee lunch room.
19
20 Hatch stated he is unable to attend the May 26 session but requested the training materials for
21 that session from Ms. Moore-Sykes.
22
23 Hanson welcomed the 3 new Commissioners, adding he looks forward to working with them in
24 the future and is awed by the intellectual power represented.
25
26 Hanson noted he had read with interest that a resident addressed the City Council recently with
27 regard to the hiring of a Staff Economic Developer which does not appear to be of interest to the
28 Council. Bergstrom agreed with this assessment.
29
.30 Hanson noted the Salvation Army property sale had been discussed by City Manager Mike
31 Mornson at a recent Chamber of Commerce luncheon and expressed concern that the Planning
32 Commission is being left out of the loop.
33
34 Hanson asked whether any developments with regard to Apache Plaza could be related. Ms.
35 Moore-Sykes stated that Opus did not renew their contract, and two theater companies are
36 interested in constructing a complex there. She added that plans presented by one of the
37 companies includes an Applebees Restaurant.
38
39 Hanson stated he and Stille had attended the basic planning session, and he asked how much
40 authority was available to the Planning Commission. He expressed his opinion that the
41 Commission should be called the Zoning Commission as the City will not give the Commission
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 10
1 the authority to deal with the issues identified.in its 1999 goals, and stated his opinion that the
2 Commission is-restricted.
3
4 Bergstrom stated the Salvation Army camp property is not officially for sale, and a recent
5 stakeholders brainstorming session was held to identify possible land uses and funding sources
6 for the property. He requested that Ms. Moore-Sykes provide copies of a report document
7 prepared as a result of that session.
8
9 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated an offer for purchase of the property had been made for$14.5 million
10 by Heart of the Earth. She added the Council had recently put a moratorium on the property
11 which precludes development for a period of 1 year. She added that Heart of the Earth has
12 indicated they can use the existing buildings.
13
14 Tillman stated she had heard that Ramsey and Hennepin County had expressed interest in the
15 property. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated Hennepin Parks Commission is very interested but money is
16 an issue and the property is smaller than they are chartered to deal with. Horst stated that the
17 City loses control over the property when the issue is opened to more organizations.
18
19 Horst welcomed the new Commissioners, adding the post can be very rewarding and it's nice to
20 be a part of City planning.
21
22 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that the two upcoming neighborhood meetings will be held May 19 and
23 May 26, 1999, both at 7:00 PM. She added the meetings were brought about by the sex offender
24 notification issue and Neighborhood Night Out.
25
26 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated a local firefighter had passed away and the funeral would be held May
27 19, 1999 at 1:30 at Nativity Church. She noted traffic will be heavy around the community
28 center which will be staffed, although many City staff will attend the funeral.
29
30 Hatch expressed interest in the Commission focusing its attention on the shopping center
31 redevelopment.
32
33 Hatch asked from which laws the Planning Commission gets its authority. Bergstrom stated the
34 City by-laws and State statutes provide the Commission with its authority. Hatch asked whether
35 there might be some basis for more authority than the Commission currently has. Bergstrom
36 stated the Commission has as much authority as the Council will delegate. Horst stated the City
37 has been more willing to delegate recently and this is an on-going process.
38
39 Hanson suggested the Commission might focus on redevelopment of the properties near the
40 shopping center which is being purchased by the City. Ms. Moore-Sykes expressed concern that
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 11
1 caution should be used when developing a particular parcel before a cohesive idea for the rest of
2 the area is discussed.
3
4 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
5 Motion by Horst, second by Stille to adjourn the meeting at 9:21 P.M.
6
7
8 Respectfully submitted,
9
10 Mary Mullen
11 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
12
STAFF REPORT
To Planning Commission
From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Management Assistant 1
Date: June 15, 1999
Subject: Richard Krier Report on St. Anthony Shopping Center Redevelopment
Richard Krier will be presenting a report on redevelopment possibilities for the St. Anthony
Shopping Center. This report will be the culmination of his recent meetings with the area
residents and merchants. Copies of two site plans are included that encapsulates ideas and
suggestions for the Shopping Center as collected from the community.
A public hearing is scheduled for.the July 13`h Planning Commission meeting.
S�
o �
0
_Pcrkhg
i
d
i
Por 59
� o0
f-TO � '•0 6 ee
GLmC'AO
o '�R�sntlal� ^"J CO
o cam. .2.-
m
m ) s
C..a m `------ .
ISM o
es .ma,� •,, -`t m � .�
rr —'1(mw-h ge�d.�+ q a aart,
buFW
.� aoopo�a000 -
m Ed90 or 5k%Aj A~
St. Anthony Shopping Center
_. ,.. 71..4... r..__ in innn
stir
0
0
O�
access e�L
CD
d
Park
Uj V
Parking
acceee
ti
N
V Ila
ee
access Pcrkhg n 7wn wed '
CO
ter.
i
acts `�' acts»
m
Aemm �� 1-'-------
1__-� Parking _ --
`
St. Anthony Shopping Center
/'Y . ry� • 7 IJA n . T •n •nf�n
STAFF REPORT
To: Planning Commission
From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Management Assistant 0A
Date: June 15, 1999
Subject: Proposed Park Dedication Ordinance
Attached is a copy of the proposed Park Dedication Ordinance that is currently before the City
Council. They are interested in having input from the Planning Commission regarding the
proposed ordinance e.g., is the idea of fees or 10% appropriate, charge commercial properties
and other thoughts or considerations. The designated Planning Commission representative to
the next Council meeting will be asked to present the Planning Commission's findings.
STAFF REPORT
To: Michael Mornson, City Manager
From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Management Assistant
Date: April 19, 1999
Subject: Proposed Parks Dedication Ordinance
The attached proposed draft of a parks dedication ordinance for the City of St. Anthony. I
called the cities of New Brighton and Arden Hills for information about their parks
dedication ordinances. Both ordinances are very similar to each other, both requiring a 10%
dedication of land to the City for the purposes of providing land that will be developed into
parks. Both ordinances also allow for fees in lieu of land dedication. The only difference
between the ordinances is that New Brighton does not require park dedication of the
commercial district,whereas Arden Hills does.
The proposed ordinance does not list any fees in lieu of dedication because they may be
subject to change and therefore, can be established by resolution.
i
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ORDINANCE 1999-005
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SUBDIVISION OF LAND
AND DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE; AMENDING
SECTION 615.07 AND AMENDING
CHAPTER 15 OF THE 1993 ST. ANTHONY CODE OF ORDINANCES
BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 1500.12
The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains:
Section 1. Section 15 of the City Code is amended to add a new Section 1500.12 to read in
its entirety as follows:
1500.12 Public Land Dedication Requirements.
Subd. 1 Land Dedication. The Owners of a parcel of land of one acre or more in size
and being subdivided shall dedicate to the City a reasonable portion of the land for use as public
parks,playgrounds, trails or open space,'or, in the alternative, the City may require a cash
contribution as provided in Subd. 2 of this Section. As a general rule, it is deemed reasonable for
the Council to require as a condition of subdivision, approval dedication of 10% of the total .
square foot area of the land being subdivided, or the cash contribution provided for in Subd. 2.
The City may determine the location and configuration of any land dedicated, taking into
consideration the suitability of the land for its intended purpose and future needs of the
community for park,playground, trail, or open space property. This Section 1500.12 shall apply
to all new residential developments, and lot combination/redivisions meant to facilitate
residential development. It shall not apply to lot combination/redivisions which do not increase
the number of residential dwellings, conversion of apartments to condominiums, or internal
leasehold improvements.
Subd. 2. Contribution in Lieu of Land. At the City's option, the subdivider shall contribute an
amount in cash, in lieu of all or a portion of the land required under Subd. 1 above as set forth in
Section 405 based on the number and type of dwelling units the subdivision will accommodate.
Subd. 3. Land Title. Prior to the dedication of the required property,the subdivider shall
provide the City with an acceptable title opinion or title insurance policy addressed to the City,
which insures the title and the City's proposed interest in the property. In any land dedication,
the subdivider must transfer good and marketable title to the City, free and clear of any
mortgages, liens, encumbrances or assessments, except easements or minor imperfections of title
acceptable to the City. If land is not formally dedicated to the City in the final plat, the
subdivider shall record all deeds for conveyance of the property to the City at the same time as
the final plat or other appropriate division documents.
-2-
Subd. 4. Land Not Credited. At the City's option, the following types of land shall not be
credited for the requirements of this Section:
(1) Land dedicated or obtained as easements for storm water retention, drainage,
roadway, or utility purposes;
(2) Land which is unusable or of limited use; and
(3) Land that is protected wetlands/flood plain.
Subd. 5. Cash Contributions. Cash contributions, for single-family residential development, will
be due and payable at the time of final plat approval by the City. Cash contributions for multi-
family residential development will be due and payable at the time of building permit issuance.
The applicant will execute a document in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney which
acknowledges the obligation to pay amounts due under Subd. 2 at the time building permits are
secured. Such documents will be in recordable form and any fee charged in connection with the
filing thereof shall be paid by the applicant.
Subd. 6. Park Fund. Any cash contribution received pursuant to Subd. 2 of this Section, shall
be placed in a separate City fund and used only for park,playground, trail, or open space
purposes.
Subd. 7. In the case of subdivision of property with existing residential dwelling units already in
place where no new units will be added, no land dedication or cash contribution shall be
required.
Section 2. Section 615.07 is amended by adding a new item No. 22 to read as follows:
Fee No. Code No. Purpose Amount
22 1500.12 Park contribution
Single family lot $750/unit
Duplex lot $650/unit
Townhouse Development $500/unit
Mobile Home $500/unit
Multiple family , apartment, $350%unit
or condominium
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in effect as of the date of its publication.
-3-
First Reading: May 25, 1999
Second Reading: June 22, 1999
Adopted:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
STAFF REPORT
To: Planning Commission
From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Management Assistant
Date: June 15, 1999
Subject: Salvation Army Camp Update
Attached are copies of documents that provide updated information regarding the proposed
uses and possible'sale of the Salvation Army Camp.
Executive Summary
St. Anthony Community "Brainstorming" Session
"Possibilities for Salvation Army Camp"
Monday, April 26,1999
This two and one half hour session was called to order on Monday
evening, April 26, 1999 in the conference room of the St. Anthony
Community Center. Mr. Clarence Ranallo the Mayor, welcomed 23
community representatives to participate in a structured. "brainstorm" of
possible uses for the 80 acre tract of land that is currently owned and used
by the Salvation Army. He stressed the fact that although it has been
mentioned that this land may be for sale, there is little other curent
information available at this date. He emphasized the necessity of being
"poised and prepared" in the event that the land becomes available for
purchase in the near future. He reminded everyone present that the City
and the School District of St. Anthony were teaming together to offer the
vested stakeholders the opportunity to express their ideas and views as to
possible uses for this unique tract of land.
The facilitator reviewed the purpose, process, and the payoff for the
meeting. The group was divided into four tables to participate in two
rounds of brainstorming. The first round asked the participants to
brainstorm, clarify, and multivote (prioritize) the top three possible uses
for the land. The following choices were presented at the general feedback
session:
• A park
• an environmental learning center
• Athletic fields
• A highly developed park (e.g. pool, picnic, playing fields, etc.)
• Retreat and/or conference center
• Community Center
•. Community/recreational center
• Corporate campus
• Senior Housing
• Maintain current use
• Joint School District Magnet School (e.g. environmental school)
• Corporate Headquarters but with public spaces
Other uses that came from the first round of discussions included
ideas such as a golf course, a restaurant/supper club, residential homes, a
.hog rendering plant in honor of the city's history, a correction center, a
new public works plant and a college campus.
There were several apparent themes that emerged from this first
discussion . All four tables agreed that these themes were important to
remember in the case that the opportunity to purchase became real. They
were described as follows:
—recreation
—multi-use
—open space
—emphasis on community
—benevolence
—"revenue"producer
—span the ages from youth to senior
—benefits accrue to broad spectrum of groups
The second round of brainstorming focused upon the creative
financing strategies that might be considered in the event that the City and
the School District were able to purchase the Salvation Army Camp. There
was a great deal of discussion both in the small groups as well as in the
general feedback session as to the necessity of developing a financing
option that would not only allow them to purchase the land, but to also
maintain it as well. One of the participants also reminded the group of the
real need to think like a community taxpayer and temper the creative ideas
with a dose of reality. There was mention of the previous call to the
community of St. Anthony to support the construction of the Community
building and what the financial impact on each taxpayer was at that point in
time. The following represents the one or two more interesting financial
ideas to emerge from each of the four groups:
• Sell other existing property (e.g. old public works)
• Public/Private purchase (model of Lifetime Fitness and the city of Plymouth was
mentioned as an example)
• Seek foundation donations, State Legislature help, etc.
• County/City/School District/Parks collaboration
• Partner with private and/or non-profit organizations
• Partner with other cities and counties
• Bond referendum
• Seek out a wealthy individual and/or apply to a foundation
• Regional Parks and/or Metropolitan Council
• Non-profit to operate the site with funding from other groups
• Holding property hostage (i.e. specify to property developer certain % of space and
usage)
• Holding company (in order to buy time)
There were several apparent issues that sparked conversation both in
and out of the small groups that resulted from the discussions of purchase.
They are as follows:
—Timing and Process,
—Scope and Environmental Impact study
—`rIF'Is it viable?
—Cost to individual household
—loss of control over land and usage
—What's the cost of not doing anything?
At the end of the meeting Dr. William Carr asked to address the
group. As a resident as well as member of the camp board, he spoke of the
uniqueness of the land, the camp and its history, and his personal
observations about the Salvation Army property board. It was agreed by all
that this opportunity is still somewhat uncertain and that more
communication is needed between the Salvation Army and possible
purchasers such as the City of St. Anthony and the School District. The
Mayor concluded the meeting by thanking the participants for their time
and their ideas, and promised to keep everyone informed as new
information is gained. The.meeting adjourned at 9:30 PM.
�� 7LIN 02 '99 19:58 FR THE SALVATION ARMY 612 566 8954 TO 7819323 P.02i02
MnflAM BOOTH PAUL A.RADER HAROLD D.HINSON
FouNaen GENERAL T9MT0R1AL COMMANCEA
DIVISIONAL HEADQUARTERS LT.COLONEL DAVID E.GAIN OLE
23M FREEWAY BLVD.ROOKLYN M,MN 55430.1793 Th� S9vatioti Amy orvis�oruc coMMiwDER
612/WS-2040
Fax 61 2558.9954 FOUNDED IN 1855
NORTHERN DIVISION
May 28, 1999
TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
RE: Silver Lake Camp 8z Conference Center
We are still in the process of determining what is the best methodology by which to
proceed with the sale of Silver Lake Camp ar Conference Center. .However, we are
making progress and want to keep you updated as to where we stand.
We are currently negotiating with a non-profit for the sale of the property. The asking
price is 14.5 million dollars with earnest money of$250,000.
You may also be aware that the City of St. Anthony has placed a moratorium on new
construction, zoning changes and building permits on the site for one year. This went Into
effect on May 11, 1999. Further, the City of St. Anthony did approve obtaining an
appraisal for the bid at its highest and best use.
If you are still Interested in the property at this point, we would be glad to accept a
purchase proposal from you or your group.
I trust that this helps to clear up some of the confusion that may have existed.In our efforts
to sell the Silver Lake Camp K Conference Center. Our goal Is still to maximize the value
of the sale of the camp so that we can build a camp In Northern Minnesota for continued
use by those who are less privileged. Our purpose Is to continue to offer the high quality
experience that boys and girls have experienced for the last 77 years at Silver Lake Camp.
May God bless you.
Sincerely yours,
y
Robert E. Thomson
Major
DIVISIONAL SECRETARY
united Way Making a Difference for Life
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 26, 1999
TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: SALVATION ARMY PROPERTY
As you know, the Council placed a moratorium on the Salvation Army property
which, in effect, stopped any rezoning changes, building permits-to be issued,
etc. The property can be sold and be used by the current owner, as well as the
prospective owner, as long as the property is being used under the conditions of
its current zoning ordinance. This is allowed by the Recreational and Open
Space District (attached). Currently, the Heart of the Earth School is in
negotiations with the Salvation Army. This is a permited use under the Open
Recreational District. The manner in which they would use the property is also
attached.
The City Council would like you to discuss and debate what the Planning
Commission would like to see,done with the property; should the property stay
zoned as Open Recreational District or should it be rezoned, etc. You can
present your findings at either the June 22"d or July 27' Council meeting,
depending on how long you need to take to explore this issue.
P E1HF9
Silver Lake - Heart Of The Eartt
Planned Use
Day care Center / Head Start
■ Elementary / Middle School
■ High School / College Prep
Adult Continuing Education
. ............. .
National Resource Center
National Conference Center
...................
■ Crisis Intervention Housing
...............
` Long Term Student Housing
...........
p ae Txe 9
z ; 'x
Silver Lake - Heart Of The Eart
Planned Use
New Athletic Center
■ Football , Baseball , Tennis., LaCrosse
complex
Cultural Traditions Center
. .. .........
Art and Crafts Center
.................
..................
■ Nature Studies , Spiritual Development
. .. ............ .... .
Ceremonial Centers (2 )
.............
...........
..... ......
.. ... ......
. ...........
...............
. ...............
..............
. ......... ■ Guest Quarters
. ...............
...............
1640.04 Accessory Uses. Subject to the provisions of Section 1650, the following uses are
permitted accessory uses in the LI District:
(a) Storage sheds which do not exceed one story in height and which have been
approved by the Council as to size and design.
(b) Buildings temporarily located on the premises.for purposes of construction
for a period not to exceed completion of construction.
1640.05 Dimensional Regulations.
Subd. 1. Height. No structure may exceed 35 feet in height or contain more than
three stories.
Subd. 2. Lot Area and Width. The minimum lot area is 15,000 square feet, and the
minimum lot width is 100 feet.
Subd. 3. Front Yard. The front yard must have a depth equal to the greater of 40
feet or a distance equal to the average of the setbacks of structures on the two
adjoining lots.
Subd. 4. Side Yards. Side yards on interior lots must be at least 15 feet each. Side
yards adjoining a street must be at least 40 feet.
Subd.-5. Rear Yards. The rear yard must be at least 15 feet in depth.
Subd. 6. Floor Area Ratio. The floor area ratio in the LI District may not exceed 1.5.
Subd. 7. Setbacks From Residential Districts. There must be a setback of at least 20
feet from any property in a residential district, within which setback area parking,
storage and/or loading facilities are excluded.
Section 1645 - R/O RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
1645.01 PuMose. The purpose of the R/O District is to regulate development in those
areas which have significant natural amenities such as trees, terrain, and water resources,
and to regulate development for recreational purposes in areas which have significant
public or private recreational potential.
1645.02 Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted in the R/O District:
(a) Outdoor or indoor recreational facilities and their supporting structures
operated by a governmental agency, a private, nonprofit service organization
or conservation group, including but not limited to lodges, kitchens, dining
halls and supporting restaurants, dormitories and golf courses.
(b) Trails and pathways for pedestrians and non-motorized means of transit.
16-29
(c) Cemeteries.
(d) Schools and government buildings.
1645.03 Impact Statement for Any Rezoning. Before an application is considered for
rezoning any R/O District, a statement indicating the expected impact of the proposed
development on the environment and public facilities including streets, schools and
utilities, and an economic feasibility study of the development, are required. Such a
statement must include:
Subd. 1. Expected Impact. An assessment of the expected impact of the project on
the watershed, including ponds, streams and wetlands.
Subd. 2. Topography. A survey of the existing topography, soil, vegetation and
habitat and how the development will affect these.
Subd. 3. Noise Control. How the developer proposes to control noise, vibration,
smoke, dust and particulant matter during and after construction.
Subd. 4. Congestion. An assessment of the impact the project will have on
congestion in streets and roadways in the vicinity, and the effect the development
will have on schools and public utilities.
Subd. 5. Economic Feasibility. A marketing study of the economic feasibility of the
proposed development, the market to be reached, and substantiation of the
financial capability of the developer to complete the proposed development.
1645.04 Accessory Uses. Subject to the provisions of Section 1650, the following accessory
uses are permitted in an R/O District:
(a) Athletic fields.
(b) Craft or art buildings.
(c) Maintenance buildings for the storage of equipment used to maintain
grounds,buildings, trees and equipment, to be located in such a way as to
minimize the potential damage to the.environment by the seepage or
spillage of oil, gasoline, solvents or lubricants.
(d) Nature interpretive centers.
(e) Swimming pools, bathhouses, gymnasiums, locker rooms and other athletic
structures.
(f) Mausoleums and crypts.
1645.05 Dimensional Regulations
16-30
r
Subd. 1. Height. No structure may exceed 35 feet in height or contain more than
three stories.
Subd. 2. Setbacks. No structure may be constructed or placed within 25 feet of a
property line.
Subd. 3. Lake Setback. No structure may be constructed or placed within 200 feet of
a lake or within 75 feet of a watercourse or ponding area.
1645.06 Building Design Requirements. All structures must be constructed of a material
and of a design which.is compatible with the natural environment as determined by the
Planning Commission and Council, and must conform with all applicable laws.
Section 1650 - GENERAL REGULATIONS
1650.01 Lot Requirements.
Subd. 1. Lot Size. Adjoining lots which were in common ownership on or after
August 18; 1976 according to the real estate records of Hennepin or Ramsey County,
Minnesota, will be deemed a single parcel if one or more of the lots is smaller than .
the minimum lot size required under the Zoning Code.
Subd. 2. Principal Structure. There may be no more than one principal structure
on a lot in any R-1,R-1A or R-2 District.
Subd. 3. Street Lines. On a through lot,both street lines will be front lot lines for
applying the yard and parking requirements of the Zoning Code.
1650.02 Accessory Buildings.
Subd. 1. In Yards. No detached accessory building may be located within any yard
other than the rear yard, except that garages may be located in side yards.
Subd. 2. Minimum Setback. No accessory building or any eave or other portion of
any accessory building may be located within three feet of any property line, except
as provided in Subdivision 6 of this Section.
Subd. 3. Accessory Buildings Attached. If an accessory building is attached to the
principal structure, it will be considered a part of the principal structure and must
comply with all setbacks and other requirements applicable to the principal
structure.
Subd. 4. Setback from Principal Structure. Unless attached to and made a part of
the principal structure, no eave or other portion of an accessory building may be
closer than five feet from any eave or other portion of a principal structure, except
as provided in Subdivision 6 of this Section.
16-31
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
4 MAY 11, 1999
5
6
7 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
8 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. followed-by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor
9 Ranallo.
10
11 II. ROLL CALL.
12 Councilmembers present: Ranallo, Marks, Faust, Cavanaugh, and Thuesen.
13 Councilmembers absent: None.
14 Also present: City Manager Mike Mornson, City Attorney William Soth.
15
16 1II. APPROVAL OF MAY 11, 1999 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
17 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve the May 11, 1999 Regular City Council Meeting
18 Agenda with the following addition:
19
20 VII. Reports,before Councilmembers Reports, Report from Parks Commission Chair Carol
21 Jindra.
22
23 Motion carried unanimously.
24
25 IV. APPROVAL OF APRIL 27, 1999 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. .
26 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen to approve_ the April 27, 1999 Regular City Council
27 Meeting Minutes as presented.
28
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30
31 V. LICENSES/PERMITS/PETITIONS.
32 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve the following licenses:
33
34 General Contractors License:
35 Dorglass Inc., Plymouth, MN/working at 3804 Highcrest Road
36 Sign-A-Rama, Roseville, MN/working at the Middle School
37 Minnesota Sign Company, Inc., Cambridge, MN`/working at 4001 Stinson Blvd
38 Northeast Tree& Timber,Mpls, MN(Renewal)
39
40 Garbage Haulers License: (Renewal)
41 BFI of North America, Inc. /Inver Grove Heights, MN
42
43 Heatiniz License:
44 Midland Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., Richfield, MN/working at 3101 Edward
45 Street
46
47 Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 2
1
2 VI.. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
3 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve the following claims:
4
5 A. Storm Water Analysis/Projects:
6 1. WSB & Associates, Inc. in the amount of:
7 a. $15,040.76 for professional services rendered from March 1, 1999 through
8 March 31, 1999 with regard to Silver Point Park&.Central Park Storm
9 Water Improvements Construction.
10 b. $1,887.74 for professional services rendered from March 1, 1999 through
11 March 31, 1999 with regard to Harding Street Public Involvement&
12 Preliminary Design.
13 C. $43.00 for professional services rendered from March 1, 1999 through
14 March 31, 1999 with regard to I/I Study.
15 d. $399.50 for professional-services rendered from March 1, 1999 through
16 March 31, 1999 with regard to DNR& FEMA Grant Administration.
17 e. $345.00 for professional services rendered from March 1, 1999 through
18 March 31, 1999 with regard to 1999 Flood Proofing Grant Program.
19 f. - $206.00 for professional services rendered from March 1, 1999 through
20 March 31, 1999 with regard to Storm Water Feasibility Study.
21 B. 1999 Street Project:
22 1. WSB & Associates, Inc. in the amount of$1,161.00 for professional services
23 rendered from March 1, 1999 through March 31, 1999 with regard to 1999 Street,
24 Utility and Stormwater Improvement Construction Services.
25 C. Legal Services:
26 1. Dorsey & Whitney in the amount of:
27 a. $2,911.55 for legal services rendered through March 31, 1999 with regard
28 to the $425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999A.-
29 b. $985.00 for legal services rendered through March 31, 1999 with regard to
30 storm water improvements.
31 C. $681.50 for general legal services rendered through March 31, 1999.
32 D. Water Filtration Plant Repair:
33 1. SEH/RCM in the amount of:
34 a. $962.93 for professional services rendered through March 31, 1999 with
35 regard to WTP repair- GAC filtration plant plans and specifications.
36 b. $1,220.75 for professional services rendered through March 31, 1999 with
37 regard to water treatment plant repair, construction administration, bidding
38 & inspection.
39 E. 3 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
40
41 Motion carried unanimously.
t 'a
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 3
1
2 VII. REPORTS.
3 Ranallo welcomed Parks Commission Chair Carol Jindra and invited her to address the Council.
4 Ms. Jindra stated the Parks Commission had met and agreed on an equipment vendor for the
5 Water Tower Park playground, and an order for equipment would be placed by Friday,May 14.
6 She added the contractor hopes to break ground by the end of the week if weather permits, which
7 means a July park opening is feasible.
8
9 Ms. Jindra stated that Silver Point Park construction is ahead of schedule and the Commission is
to pleased with the progress. She added the playground equipment for that park would be ordered
11 and installed by the summer.
12
13 Ms. Jindra expressed the Parks Commission's consensus that the Salvation Army Camp would
14 be ideal park space for the City, adding this sentiment was echoed at the recent stakeholders
15 brainstorming session. She expressed concern that a recent Bulletin article misrepresented that
16 meeting and indicated the consensus was for housing development,which was not the case.
17
18 Ms. Jindra stated the Parks Commission strongly urges the Council to determine possible
19 partners and financial opportunities available to enable the City to purchase the property, as well
20 as considering a reciprocal use agreement with the property's new owners if it does not.
21
22 Ranallo asked whether.Silver Point Park would be in use this summer. Ms. Jindra stated the play
23 equipment and trails would be usable but the fields will not be ready for use and will be blocked
24 off. She reiterated the Commission's pleasure with the park's progress.
25
26 Cavanaugh asked whether the Sports Boosters had approved the soccer field grade in Silver Point
27 Park. Ms. Jindra confirmed this, adding the grade on that field is typical of soccer fields.
28
29 Marks asked for an update with regard to resigning Commissioners. Ms. Jindra stated that 2
30 Commissioners are resigning, one due to other commitments and one due to a proposal of
31 marriage which causes her to leave the City. She added that 2 individuals have expressed
32 interest in these openings and she would like to arrange interviews with the Council. Ranallo
33 stated the positions must be posted in the bulletin to make it open to everyone, and interviews
34 would be conducted with the 2.individuals in contact with Ms. Jindra as well as any other
35 interested residents.
36
37 Ranallo thanked Ms. Jindra for her report, and requested that she convey the Council's
38 appreciation to the Commission of their hard work and efforts on behalf of the City.
39
40 A. Councilmembers.
City Council Meeting,Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 4
1 Faust reported that the Volunteer Dinner on April 30, 1999 was a great event, and he thanked the
2 individuals who participated in volunteer programs throughout the past year.
3
4 Faust reported that the Spring Clean-Up Day held May 1, 1999 was a resounding success. He
5 thanked the mayor and Councilmembers who were able to attend and assist.in this effort. He
6 also thanked the community for their cooperation in making the community a clean, safe place to
7 live.
8
9 Faust reported on 2 issues discussed at the May 6, 1999 Cable Commission meeting: a television
10 shoot with Students Against Drunk Driving (SADD) members which aired this week; and a .
11 Cable Commission scholarship which was awarded to St. Anthony High School student Jason
12 March who will use the funds to attend a college course in mass communications.
13
14 Ranallo stated that a Cable Club has been formed by.City students interested in cable, which is a
15 first for the City and will represent some'real help for the cable channel.
16
17 Thuesen thanked those residents and City staff involved in planning the volunteer dinner which
18 was a big success.
19
20 Thuesen reported on his attendance at a recent Community Services Advisory Council meeting
21 which was their final meeting until the fall, at which time the group plans to focus on deficit
22 spending which has occurred over the past few years. He added some issues to be discussed are
23 fee increases,decrease in programming, and other revenue options.
24
25 Thuesen stated that Community Services reports good participation in their programs, and good
26 feedback from residents who have been involved in these programs.
27
28 Thuesen reported on his attendance at the 2nd intergenerational dialogue at which the results of
29 the 1 st dialogue were discussed and a plan of action was considered.
30
31 Cavanaugh reported that the 2nd intergenerational dialogue was a forum for prioritizing the 149
32 recommendations which were resultant from the 1 st dialogue. He stated that 4 major committees
33 were formed to discuss these recommendations and a report will be presented to the Council with
34 the committee's findings to discuss how this visioning work can be brought to the Council's
35 agenda.
36
37 Cavanaugh stated that one of the issues discussed was safe, affordable activities for youth, which
38 is also a priority for the Chemical Health Coalition. He added there was a need expressed for a
39 teen center, and 2 groups are reviewing available land and buildings for such a purpose. He
40 expressed his enthusiasm over the amount of energy that participants bring to these dialogues.
41
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 5
1 Cavanaugh expressed his thanks to the City staff who planned the volunteer appreciation dinner
2 which was an excellent event. He added that he received feedback from some attendees who
3 wanted more time for socializing.
4
5 Cavanaugh reported that the VillageFest monthly meeting took place Monday, May 10, 1999 and
6 plans are moving ahead and on schedule.
7
8 Cavanaugh reported on his attendance at an ACTION Board Meeting at which the
9 intergenerational dialogues were discussed and the need to keep leadership momentum going.
10
11 Cavanaugh reported on his attendance at a Hennepin County Y2K event which revealed that the
12 real work toward Y2K compliance and organization is at the community level and in
13 neighborhoods.
14
15 Cavanaugh stated that the SADD demonstration shown at the high school was impressive, and
16 involved representatives from the Police and Fire Departments, Sherrifl's Office, medical
17 coroner,and Lifelink helicopter. He added that the video is excellent and,should be shown if it is
18 available. He stated it was critiqued in the auditorium after the showing, and a paraplegic victim
19 of a-drunk driver gave his perspective.
20
21 Marks applauded the planners of the volunteer dinner and Spring Clean-Up Day.
22
23 Marks reported on his attendance at the Parks Commission meeting as Council liaison. He stated
24 a group of City youth attended who were interested in seeing a skateboarding area constructed in
25 Central Park. He expressed the group's positive attitude and interest in having a safe, chemical-
26 free way to have fun. He stated he was impressed with the Parks Commission's supportive
27 response to the youth. He added that the Commission is working on many positive issues and
28 their work in the parks is progressing.
29
30 Marks reported that the Salo, Finland Fire Brigade Band's web page displays a photo taken of
31 the band on the St. Anthony fire truck which he has been told is very interesting. He added that
32 the Salo dance group visit will take place in about a month.
33
34 Thuesen asked,with regard to the skateboarding discussion at the Parks Commission meeting,
35 how the skateboarders' comments and requests were received. Marks stated the Commission's
36 response was positive, and they agreed to look into the issue. He added that the skateboarders
37 said that a skateboarding area was being planned at Nativity Church. He asked Ms. Jindra to
38 address this issue.
39
40 Ms. Jindra stated that Commission was impressed with the skateboarders, ranging from 8th to
41 11th grades, and their willingness to express their interests to the community. She added they
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 6
1 indicated that skateboarding was their passion; and they asked the Commission to consider
2 adding a skateboarding area to Central Park where they could practice and have fun in a
3 chemical-free way.
4
5 Ms. Jindra stated the Commission might consider such an arrangement on a trial basis. She
6 added that Nativity Church is planning a skateboarding area which the Commission can observe
7 to determine whether it is something the City might want to try.
8
9 Ranallo stated that a drawback might be the City's insurance liability which might require kids to
10 sign a waiver. Marks stated the skateboarders were aware of the insurance issues. Jindra stated
11 the Commission had suggested a sign could be used requiring protective gear, and the
12 skateboarders were receptive to that suggestion.
13
14 B. Maw
15 Ranallo stated the 1 st of 3 neighborhood meetings would take place tomorrow May 12, 1999 at
16 7:00 PM in Council chambers involving residents and businesses south of 29th Avenue. He
17 added these meetings will cover general topics such as crime prevention, Y2K compliance, and
18 -sex offender notification. He invited residents to attend these meetings based on their area of
19 residence.
20
21 Ranallo stated the emergency situation video tape is available to be sold, and will be aired on the
22 cable channel. He added he is unsure whether a copy is available at the library.
23
24 C. City Manager.
25 Mornson stated the City is working with High School administrators and engineers to design a
26 ring road around the school at no cost to the City which will be an improvement over the existing
27 road. He added this improvement is part of the school referendum of a few years ago.
28
29 Mornson reported the Salvation Army camp ad hoc committee has directed himself and the
30 School superintendent to work with Springsted in exploring options for possible public purchase
31 of the-property, as well as impact to taxpayers. He added that Springsted will compile a proposal
32 for consideration by the School and City Council,the cost for which will be split between the
33 two. He stated this will probably be on the next meeting's agenda.
34
35 Mornson reported that a meeting is being arranged involving representatives from Hennepin
36 County Parks System and hopefully Anoka and Ramsey Counties, to begin a dialogue to
37 determine county interest and possible funding. He added he will report back to the Council at
38 the next meeting, and the ad hoc committee continues to meet.
39
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 7
1 Mornson reported that 15 different firms have expressed an interest in assisting the City with the
2 design of the new public.works facility. He added he will report to the Council on this issue in
3 mid-June.
4
5 Morrison stated an audio system will be installed in the Community Center's atrium with funds
6 from the general improvement fund as agreed at a recent worksession. He added the cost of the
7 audio system will be partly covered under a grant from the North Suburban Cable Commission
8 which will also cover costs of a larger podium microphone and lower cameras in the Council
9 chambers.
10
11 Morrison stated that basic planning courses will be available on-site to the new Planning
12 Commissioners as well as the existing Commissioners and interested Councilmembers.
13
14 Morrison stated the City is in the process of planning next year's flood project, and the feasibility
15 study on 29th Avenue is moving along. He added that as 29th Avenue is considered a State aid
16 highway,the City will need to request the capability to borrow against funds from the
17 Department of Transportation.
18
19 Cavanaugh asked whether a design for the pocket parks along St. Anthony Boulevard has been
20 finalized. Mornson stated that other homes are still to be purchased bylhe City, and the June
21 worksession will include a report from the consultants negotiating on those properties and from
22 WSB on what will happen to the total project if the City does not acquire the 3 remaining
23 properties.
24
25 Morrison reported that a neighborhood meeting will be held,May 20, 1999 to begin planning for
26 the 2nd storage pond, construction for which will commence in 12-18 months. He added that the
27 elimination of the holding pond at the north corner of the community center as been approved by
28 the Rice Creek Watershed District due to the larger_pond being constructed in Central Park.
29
30 Mornson stated that City staff will meet this week and throughout the summer with
31 representatives from the DNR regarding the bonding bill for next summer. He emphasized the
32 City's excellent relationship with the DNR which will be helpful in this process.
33
34 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None.
35
36 IX. NEW BUSINESS.
37 A. Resolution 99-036, re: Authorize debt analysis study.
38 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen to approve Resolution 99-036, authorizing a debt analysis
39 study for the City of St. Anthony.
40
41 Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 8
_ 1
2 B. Resolution 99-037, re: Support for acquisition of abandoned Burlington Northern
3 Railroad corridor.
4 Marks stated the railroad property in question could eventually be used for a light rail system, but
5 meanwhile could be utilized for trails, and might ultimately be used for trails.
6
7 Ranallo welcomed Hennepin County Commissioner Mark Stengline and invited him to address
8 the Council on this issue. Stengline stated that the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority
9 views this property as a vital link for future rail needs_as it completes a criss-cross of the entire
10 region. He added the County looks forward to the City's support in its purchase of this property.
11 _
12 Motion by Marks, second by Cavanaugh to approve Resolution 99-037, declaring support for
13 acquisition of the abandoned Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad corridor
14 through Roseville, St..Anthony, and Minneapolis.
15
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17
18 C. Ordinance 1999-003, re: Moratorium.on the Salvation Army Camp property (waive 1st
19 and 2nd readings and adopt).
20 City Attorney William Soth stated a Minnesota State Statute permits cities to impose a
21 moratorium for a period of 1 year on a property to conduct studies regarding future zoning and
22 use of that particular property within the City. He added the moratorium may be extended a
23 further 18 months.
24
7
25 Soth stated the moratorium will not affect current uses or owners of the property but will put on
26 hold any applications for permits to change those uses, rezone or construct different facilities on
27 the property.
28
29 Soth stated that from time to time the waiving of the normal 3 readings of an ordinance is
30 deemed appropriate, and this would be such a case as 3 readings would defer adoption during
31 which time applications could be made.
32
33 Cavanaugh asked what types of uses are permitted under recreational zoning. Mornson reviewed
34 the City's ordinance on recreational zoning, including indoor/outdoor recreational facilities
35 operated by government agencies or non-profit organizations.
36
37 Cavanaugh asked whether the moratorium would create the potential for some change in land
38 use. Soth stated the moratorium will allow that to be studied.
39
40 J. Patrick Plunkett, an attorney for the Salvation Army, addressed the Council with regard to this
41 issue, stating the Army has been in active negotiations with a party for the sale of the property
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 9
1 for a sum substantially in excess of the City's upper limit of$10 million. He added the Army
2 feels this moratorium may not be used for the purposes of targeting a particular property, and the
3 action is arbitrary and would not be sustained in the courts.
4
5 Mr. Plunkett stated the moratorium would have the chilling effect of preventing the Salvation
6 Army from selling the property,as any interested party would be purchasing the property at risk.
7 He added that this moratorium would have a vast negative impact on the Salvation Army, which
8 conducts many good works throughout the community.
9
10 Ranallo stated the City has attempted to obtain any amount of information from the Salvation
11 Army with no success over the past months, and Mr. Plunkett's information is the first the
12 Council has heard about these active negotiations.
13
14 Mr. Plunkett stated the Army's decision to sell the property is based on a number of factors,
15 including an opportunity to acquire property in northern Minnesota for a camp. He added the
16 Army is not in a position to maintain 2 camps, and if the ability to sell this camp is put on hold, it
17 will adversely affect the Army's ability to proceed with its plans.
18
19 Ranallo asked whether a final decision has been made. Plunkett stated that no purchase
20 agreement has been signed,but if the City and School Board proceed with these condemnation
21 proceedings,the numbers are in excess of what has been presented.
22
23 Soth stated that risks are always involved with the sale of property which is unique. He added
24 the City needs to determine what the permitted uses of this property should be, adding that there
25 is no current intention to rezone or make changes to the Comprehensive Plan. He reiterated that
26 State law gives the City the right to hold off any changes in the meantime.
27
28 Plunkett stated that in his opinion the moratorium and the potential condemnation which it
29 represents is not consistent with the laws of the state.
30
31 Ranallo stated the City has never discussed the possibility of condemnation. Plunkett stated the
32 potential for condemnation would exist if a moratorium were imposed.
33
34 Cavanaugh stated the City is on a journey from Salvation Army ownership of the property to its
35 new owners, whoever they may be. He added the moratorium allows the community to make
36 this orderly transition from present to future use, and the City has some control over future use.
37 Plunkett stated these opportunities exist for the City through rezoning and conditional use
38 permits which carry statutory time limits. He reiterated that the Salvation Army believes the
39 moratorium is inappropriate.
40
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 10
1 Marks stated the Council is responsible for the interests of the City and its residents. He added
2. the Salvation Army camp property represents a tremendous opportunity for the City's parks
3 system. He expressed his belief that the moratorium is prudent and necessary.
4
5 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to waive the first two readings and adopt Ordinance 1999-
6 003, relating to a moratorium on changes in the use of the property known as the Salvation Army
7 Camp property, and on the issuance of any new building permits or�other permits for such
8 property; amending Section 1330.01 and Section 1330.04, Subd. 1 of the St. Anthony City Code.
9
10 Motion carried unanimously.
I1 -
12 D. Resolution 99-038,re: Authorize appraisal of Salvation AM Camp property.
13 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen to approve Resolution 99-038, authorizing appraisal of the
14 Salvation Army Camp property in the City of St. Anthony.
15
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17
18 E. Resolution 99-039, re: Memorandum of Understanding with ISD#282 relating to the
19 1999 local election.
20 Motion by Thuesen, second by Marks to approve Resolution 99-039, approving the
21 Memorandum of Understanding with St. Anthony/New Brighton School District No. 282
22 relating to the 1999 local election.
23
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25
26 F. Resolution 99-040, re: Approve proposal for alley improvements.
27 Motion by Marks, second by Cavanaugh to approve Resolution 99-040, approving a proposal for
28 completion of certain alley improvements.
29
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31
32 G. Ordinance 1999-004, re: Right-of-ways (1st reading).
33 Motion by Faust, second by.Thuesen to approve Ordinance 1999-004,relating to managing and
34 regulating public right-of-way in the public interest and to provide for the issuance and.
35 regulation of right-of-way permits by adding a new Section 1165 to the 1993 St. Anthony Code
36 of Ordinances.
37
38 Motion carried unanimously.
39
40 Ranallo welcomed Diana Roadfeldt to address the Council. Diana Roadfeldt, 2924 Rankin
41 Road, stated she wished to provide more information for the Council with regard to available
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 11
1 grants for development. She added that when she last addressed the Council, it was noted that
2 many grants are income sensitive for which the City would not be eligible.
3
4 Ms. Roadfeldt stated other metropolitan communities have received substantial grants from the
5 Liveable Communities fund, which aims to minimize the limit of urban sprawl and favors first
6 ring suburbs. She added Minnetonka had recently received a grant of$775,000 to redevelop
7 their city park. Mornson stated there was an housing income component to the Minnetonka
8 grant. Ms. Roadfeldt stated it was just for parks.
9
10 She expressed regret that the City is missing these grant opportunities, and urged the Council to
11 seriously consider moving quickly to help the City proceed with researching and obtaining
12 available grants.
13
14 Cavanaugh asked whether the City had explored these grant opportunities. Mornson stated some
15 grants have been explored, but the Liveable Communities funds usually entail a housing
16 component. Ms. Roadfeldt stated she had confirmed that a housing component is not tied to the
17 grant.
18
19 Ranallo requested that Mornson review these grant opportunities. Cavanaugh expressed interest
20 in reviewing whether the grant opportunities are proportionate with the effort it takes to obtain
21 the funds and determining whether any real opportunities exist. Faust stated the League of
22 Minnesota Cities might have some resources to assist with this.
23
24 T'huesen expressed interest in exploring grant opportunities for future projects, adding that while
25 City staff does an excellent job in this area,the City might be missing out on these opportunities.
26
27 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to direct City Manager Mike Mornson to investigate available
28 grant programs and make recommendations to the City Council.
29
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31
32 Cavanaugh expressed concern that the Salvation Army Camp property situation is not being
33 handled with the necessary urgency, and the appraisal process will be lengthy. He stressed the
34 importance of moving forward quickly for the City's legitimacy in the process.
35
36 Faust stated it will be necessary to determine the property's worth before an offer is made.
37 Ranallo stated that funding sources have not been determined. Faust stated the City must
38 determine whether there are willing collaborators with the necessary funds, and Mornson's
39 meeting with the Regional Parks is a step in the right direction. He added the moratorium gives
40 the City the opportunity to compile an orderly, managed plan.
41
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 11, 1999
Page 12
1 Cavanaugh stated the City's objectives should be carried out with dispatch, especially in light of
2 Mr.Plunkett's information regarding active negotiations for the property, and expressed his
3 frustration.
4
5 Marks stated it is necessary to determine what the City would do with the property and arrive at a
6 consensus, adding he would like to see it as part of the parks system. He added the community
7 must come together to make this decision first.
8
9 Cavanaugh stated that collaborators would be involved in such a decision. Thuesen stated that
10 while a sense of urgency exists, it is important that the process be systematic, and an appraisal is
11 an important part of the process.
12
13 Ms. Jindra reiterated the Parks Commission's position that the City needs to approach any and all
14 avenues for collaboration and pursue the property for parklands.
15
16 X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None.
17
18 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
19 Motion by Marks, second by Cavanaugh to adjourn the meeting at 8:24 P.M.
20
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22
23 Respectfully submitted,
24
25 Mary Mullen
26 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
27
28
29
30 Mayor
31
32
33
34 ATTEST:
35 City Clerk
36
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
4 MAY 25, 1999
5
6
7 . I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
8 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor-
9 Ranallo.
10
11 The Council and audience observed a moment of silence in remembrance of firefighter William
12 Myers who died last week. Ranallo presented a memorial plaque to his widow, Jan.
13
14 II. ROLL CALL.
15 Councilmembers present: Ranallo, Marks, Faust, Cavanaugh, and Thuesen.
16 Councilmembers absent: None.
17 Also present: City Manager Mike-Mornson, City Attorney William Soth.
18
19
20 III. APPROVAL OF MAY 25, 1999 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
21 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve the May 25, 1999 Regular City Council Meeting
22 Agenda as presented.
23 Motion carried unanimously.
24
25 IV. APPROVAL OF MAY 11, 1999 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES.
26 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen to approve the May 11, 1999 Regular City Council
27 Meeting Minutes as presented.
28
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30
31 V. LICENSES/PERMITS/PETITIONS.
32 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve the following licenses:
33
34 General Contractors License:
35 Central Minnesota Tree Service, Fridley, MN
36 Johnson Concrete Masonry& Waterproofmg, Minneapolis,,MN
37 Arrigoni Brothers Company, St. Paul, MN/Tower Park Contractor
38
39 Heating Licenses:
40 Marsh Heating & Air Conditioning, Brooklyn Park, MN/working at 3612 Coolidge
41
42 Multiple Dwelling License: (Renewal)
43 Macalaster Manor, 3800 & 3808 Macalaster Drive
44 Chandler Place, 3701 Chandler Drive
45 Equinox Properties, 2808 Silver Lane
46 Autumnwoods Apartments, 2600 Kenzie Terrace
47 Caravelle Apartments, 3713-3720 Foss Road
Y
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 2
1 Highcrest Manor, 3605-3615 - 37th Avenue NE
2
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4
5 Motion by Thuesen, second by Faust to approve the following license:
6
7 Temporary 3.2 Beer Permit:
8 Hai Quan/Honeywell Finance Department Picnic/July 22, 1999 /Central Park
9
10 Voting on the motion: Ranallo, Faust, Thuesen and Cavanaugh voted aye. Marks voted nay.
11
12 The motion carried.
13
14 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
15 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve the following claims:
16
17 A. Purchase of Properties:
18 1. Everareen Land Services Company in the amount of$709.80 for service and
19 expense for April 16, 1999 through April 30, 1999.
20 B. Underground Storage Tanks:
21 1. Ceres Environmental Services in.the amount of$2,000.00 for additional work
22 performed for the UST removal and AST installation project at the Public Works
23 Department.
24 2. Nova Consulting Group in the amount of$1,385.00 for professional services
25 rendered with regard to the public works facility and petroleum release
26 investigation.
27 C. Legal/Prosecutions`.
28 1. Foster, Wentzell, Hedback& Brever in the amount of$3,000.00 for professional
29 services rendered.
30 D. Engineering Services:
31 1. SEH/RCM in the amount of.
32 a. $500.00 for professional services rendered for the period ending March 31,
33 1999 with regard to 1998 bridge inspection.
34 b. $250.00 for professional services rendered for the period ending March 31,
35 1999 with regard to 1999 State aid reports.
36 C. $149.97 for professional services rendered for the period ending March 31,
37 1999 with regard to 33rd Avenue construction.
38 d. $1,906.13 for professional services rendered for the period ending March
39 31, 1999 with regard to 1998 street improvements construction.
40 e. $3,981.03 for professional services rendered for the period ending March
41 31, 1999 with regard to Silver Lake Road watermain.
1
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 3
1 E. 1999 Street and Water Main Improvements:
2 1. Northdale Construction Company in the amount of$55,153.77 for 1999 street and
3 watermain improvements.
4 F. Silver Point Park and Central Park Storm Water Improvements:
5 1. Richard Knutson, Inca in the amount of$56,486.88 for Silver Point Park&
6 Central Park Stormwater Improvement Project.
7 G. 2 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
8
9 Motion carried unanimously.
10
11 VII. REPORTS.
12 A. Planning Commission- May 18, 1999.
13 Mayor Ranallo welcomed Planning Commissioner Randy Stille and invited him to
14 address the Council.
15
16 1. Sunset Memorial Cemetery: for 2250 St. Anthony Boulevard: side yard setback
17 variance request.
18 Stille explained the owners of Sunset Memorial Cemetery are requesting a sideyard
19 variance request to construct a sidewalk around the mausoleum. He added the Planning
20 Commission recommends approval of this request.
21
22 Marks asked what hardship had been found in connection with this request. Stille stated
23 the sidewalk is needed to accommodate staff operating heavy equipment as well as for
24 families visiting the mausoleum and grounds in inclement weather.
25
26 Cavanaugh stated the sidewalk seems to be an integral part of the mausoleum, and asked
27 why it wasn't included in the original design. Dennis Bridges, a representative from
28 Sunset Memorial Park, stated the original building permit did not incorporate sidewalks
29 around the entire structure,which needed to be in the original permit process. He added
30 they thought they could complete the process after the building was built, but then
31 discovered they would be encroaching on the setback.
32
33 Marks stated the necessary hardship must relate to City ordinances or unusual topography
34 or shape of the property. Stille stated the omission of the sidewalks from the original
35 plan was an oversight on the part of the contractor and probably would have been initially
36 approved.
37
38 Ranallo noted the welfare and safety of staff and visitors is affected by the lack of a
39 sidewalk.
40
N r
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 4
1 Cavanaugh thanked Mr. Bridges for his efforts in maintaining the cemetery which is a
2 wonderful park, adding the residents are the beneficiaries.
3
4 Motion by Cavanaugh, second by Thuesen to approve a sideyard setback variance request
5 from Sunset Memorial Cemetery.
6
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8
9 2. Dave Sperry; for 4XXX Fordham Drive; lot width and lot area variance requests.
10 Mr. Stille explained that a request is recommended for approval by the Planning
11 Commission for lot width and lot area variances on property which Arvid and Eleanor
12 Johnson intend to sell to Mr. and Mrs. David Sperry.
13
14 Marks stated there is clearly a hardship in this case as created by City ordinance.
15
16 Cavanaugh stated a reference had been made to water problems in the area, and asked if
17 that issue had been resolved. Stille stated a resident of that neighborhood, who is a civil
18 engineer, indicated he believes water problems in that neighborhood are caused by
19 inadequate pipes on Silver Lake Road and not the addition of 1 home.
20
21 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve lot width and lot area variance requests for
22 4XXX Fordham Drive, David Sperry,Buyer.
23
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25
26 3. Coppo Partners; for 2837 Anthony Lane South; rear yard setback variance
27 request.
28 Stille explained that a request is recommended for approval by the Planning Commission
29 for rear yard variance request by Coppo Partners to construct a warehouse addition at
30 2837 Anthony Lane.
31
32 Marks asked what hardship was associated with this request. Stille stated the building
33 was built in 1972 while the zoning code was modified in 1978. and as such the code
34 created the hardship. Marks asked whether the proposed addition requires a variance
35 because of its placement in relation to the existing building. Stille stated the variance
36 relates to the whole structure because it was grandfathered in.
37
38 Faust stated the building is nonconforming at its present site, and the addition requires a
39 variance as it is being added to a nonconforming use.
40
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 5
1 Motion by Faust, second by Thuesen, to approve a rear yard variance request by Coppo
2 Partners for 2837 Anthony Lane.
3
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5
6 B. Stuart Bonniwell will present the 1998 Ci , Audit.
7 Ranallo welcomed Stuart Bonniwell and invited him to address the Council. Mr:Bonniwell
8 reviewed the 1998 City Audit Report, which he presented to the Council at their May 4, 1999
9 worksession for comments and questions. -He added the changes to the final report were a result
10 of issues raised at that worksession.
12 Mr. Bonniwell noted an addition to the report on Page 4-5 of Exhibit A, an.exhibit of fund types
13 and account groups, to include the general fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, and
14 capital project funds.
15
16 Mr. Bonniwell noted, under the column General Long-Term Debt in Exhibit A on Page 5, the
17 City currently has over$7 million in general long term debt. He added the remaining sections of
18 the report are concerned with details of the variance funds which were reviewed extensively at
19 the recent worksession.
20
21 Cavanaugh stated there appear to be only 2 recommendations in the report, pertaining to a parks
22 improvements fund and liquor inventory fund. He asked Mr. Bonniwell to review these
23 recommendations. Mr. Bonniwell stated the creation of a parks improvements fund would assist
24 the City in attracting funds to be spent in the future, similar to a capital project fund but
25 designated for parks.
26
27 Mr. Bonniwell stated, with regard to the liquor inventory system, an adjustment was made to the
28 inventory at the end of 1998, and he recommends a quarterly reconciliation of funds in case of
29 discrepancy.
30
31 Cavanaugh asked how the Council should act on these recommendations. Mr. Bonniwell stated
32 last year's recommendations were addressed by City management. Mr. Mornson stated the parks
33 improvements fund issue will be addressed at the budget worksession. Mr. Bonniwell stressed
34 the importance of making funds more visible for parks improvements.
35
36 Cavanaugh noted Mr. Bonniwell's statement dated March 30 which was included in the meeting
37 packet but not referenced in the audit report. He stated he believes the information would be of
38 interest to the public and should be in the report. Mr. Bonniwell stated that is a separate letter
39 which is not typically included in the report of items which he felt might be of interest to the
40 Council. He added this is a standard practice.
41
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 6
1 Ranallo noted the first paragraph of the report notes the financial condition of the City remains
2 strong. Mr. Bonniwell confirmed the City's finances are in good shape and have not eroded.
3
4 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to accept the 1998 City of St. Anthony Financial Report as
5 prepared by Stuart J. Bonniwell, Certified Public Accountant.
6
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8
9 C. Mark Flaten will be present to discuss renewal of the City's insurance.
10 Ranallo welcomed Mark.Flaten, Berkley Risk Services, and invited him to address the Council.
11 Mr. Flaten reviewed the City's insurance renewal.and premiums, noting those items which had
12 increased dramatically, such as automobile premiums due to the addition of 2 cars.
13
14 Mr. Flaten noted the general increase is mainly due to Worker's Compensation, related to an
15 increase in the City's payroll.
16
17 Mr. Flaten noted the Y2K coverage, which is optional, is dependent upon coverage for the City
18 from the League of Minnesota Cities, a decision on which is forthcoming and should be made
19 within 30 days.
20
21 Ranallo asked whether the City would receive a dividend back this year, and whether that was
22 reflected in these numbers. Mr. Flaten stated the dividend should have already been received by
23 the City and was not reflected in the renewal notice. Finance Director Roger Larson confirmed
24 the dividend had been received.
25
26 Marks asked, with regard to Y2K premiums, whether the City should expect to have it in place
27 and make the decision at a later date. Mr. Flaten stated the decision to take additional Y2K
28 coverage could be deferred.
29
30 Cavanaugh requested clear delineation of what is covered under the Y2K premium, and an
31 appreciation for issues which that policy will.handle. Mr. Flaten stated the City should
32 determine whether major vendors and service providers are Y2K compliant. Ranallo stated they
33 indicate they are compliant but the City is unsure.
34
35 Faust asked whether the City will indeed be insured by the League of Minnesota Cities for Y2K
36 issues if they find the City in compliance. Mr. Flaten stated the League will make an offer of
37 coverage if they find the City to be a good risk.
38
39 Cavanaugh asked for clarification with regard to the lack of competition among insurance
40 companies for the League. Mr. Flaten stated the League comprises an insurance pool which is
41 owned by its member cities, and its entities belong to this pool which produces good returns.
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 7
1
2 Mr. Flaten drew the Council's attention to his letter of May 19 informing City staff that Berkley -
3 should resign as the City's consultant due to a potential conflict of interest related to the League
4 of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. He expressed his enjoyment at-working with the Council
5 over the years, and thanked them for their past relationship. He assured the Council that all
6 issues will be resolved before the relationship is ended.
7
8 Ranallo expressed his appreciation to Mr. Flaten of his hard work on behalf of the City, and
9 recalled Berkley's support when the City was unable to obtain insurance anywhere else. He
10 added Mr. Flaten's services have been greatly appreciated by the Council and Staff.
11 -
12 Marks agreed, noting that Mr. Flaten and Berkley have improved the City's insurance situation
13 significantly over the years.
14
15 Motion by Faust, second by Marks to approve renewal of the City's insurance coverage for 1999
16 with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.
17
18 Motion carried unanimously.
19 D. Councilmembers.
20 Cavanaugh reported on his attendance at the St. Anthony neighborhood meetings, which were
21 well attended by interested residents. He requested that copies of Kim Moore-Sykes presentation
22 and the Y2K procedures be available as hand-outs at the last meeting. Ranallo noted these
23 copies had been available in the community center lobby at the first meeting.
24
25 Cavanaugh stated that information on the Crime Watch program should be available at the
26 meeting as well,to provide residents with information regarding requirements and process, as
27 there seems to be much interest. He noted a resident had commended the Fire and Police
28 Departments at the 2nd meeting for their hard work.
29
30 Marks reported that a memorial service held recently in the Hennepin County Government
31 Center to honor officers who have died in the line of duty was very moving and inspirational.
32
33 Marks presented a tour schedule for the upcoming Rivakat Dance Group visit from Salo, Finland.
34 He encouraged interested residents to contact City staff about the family dinners evening,
35 particularly those with teenagers.
36
37 Faust stated he attended the neighborhood meetings, expressing his appreciation of resident's
38 support of the Police and Fire Departments. He added other departments deserve recognition as
39 well as they have a great impact on the City and are a real asset to the community.
40
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 8
1 Faust stated the legislature adjourned on May 17, and some new rules which appear to be
2 paternalistic will not be insurmountable or burdensome,
3
4 Thuesen congratulated staff and all involved in planning the neighborhood meetings which were
5 a success. He recommended holding such meetings on a yearly basis to give residents-an
6 opportunity to speak on various issues in a more informal setting than the Council meetings.
7
8 E. Mayor.
9 Ranallo stated the neighborhood meetings,which were a success, were attended by less than I%
10 of the population, which he finds disappointing considering the staff time and planning efforts
11 required. He suggested residents might think things are going well within the City and have no
12 complaints.
13
14 F. City Manager.
15 Mr. Mornson brought to the Council's attention a memo prepared by Kim Moore-Sykes
16 outlining various grant programs. He added this was prompted by a recent discussion at which it
17 was suggested that the City is missing out on grant opportunities.
18
19 Mr. Mornson stated that Ms. Moore-Sykes had reviewed various financial sources and grant
20 programs, and indicated whether the City was eligible for these programs. He noted that the City
21 has been successful in obtaining $3.2 million in outside funding over the past 2 years, and has
22 requested another$2.6 million.
23
24 Mr. Mornson stated, in his opinion, no opportunities are being missed. He added he feels the
25 City has staff who are capable of applying for grant opportunities. He noted that both he and Ms.
26 Moore-Sykes have applied for grants independently in the past, and often fund recipients are
27 conceded before the grant process is completed.
28
29 Cavanaugh stated the resident was making the point about available grants, and perhaps there
30 was a communication problem. He suggested Mr. Mornson might provide a quarterly report on
31 grant applications and activities to the Council. Ranallo stated the City has been deficient in
32 making these activities visible.
33
34 Thuesen stated that while larger grants are more visible, he agrees that smaller amounts are
35 important and provide much relief, and should be communicated to the public.
36
37 Mornson stated that 15 firms had recently walked through the public works facility, and 5 of
38 those firms submitted proposals to the City. He added the staffs recommendations will be
39 presented to the Council at the June 22, 1999 regular meeting, and the recommended firm will be
40 present to answer questions.
41
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 9
1 Cavanaugh stated he would prefer to have this discussion at a worksession. Ranallo agreed. Mr.
2 Mornson agreed to schedule this issue for discussion at upcoming worksession.
3
4 Mr. Mornson stated the 29th Avenue feasibility report will be deferred to the June 22, 1999
5 regular meeting. He added a neighborhood meeting was held with regard to the 2nd storage
6 pond, the intent of which was to reintroduce the issue and obtain permission from residents to
7 enter the property and do soils testing and survey work. He noted property owners were asked to
8 respond by June 1, 1999.
9
10 Mr. Mornson stated a petition was filed with the Environmental Quality Board by the
11 neighborhood to have the City complete an Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW). He
12 added the Council will need to act on this, and staff is reviewing the options.
13
14 City Attorney Bill Soth stated the agency makes the determination of whether the petition is
15 proper and meets all regulations and requirements. He added the City can do nothing and see
16 what the agency determines. He noted, in any case, there is no urgency because no action is
17 currently being taken and no permits are being issued.
18
19 Mr. Soth noted the purpose of the EAW is to determine whether an Environmental Impact
20 Statement is required. He added the EAW is completed with assistance from City-retained
21 engineers, and is a standard procedure. Cavanaugh asked whether WSB would be the best
22 choice. Mr. Soth stated WSB is already familiar with the project and would be a good choice.
23
24 Mr. Mornson reminded the Council of its joint worksession with the Parks Commission at 6:00
25 PM on Tuesday, June 1, 1999.
26
27 Mr. Mornson stated, with regard to the Salvation Army Camp property,he and Ranallo met with
28 members of-the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District to determine their interest in the
29 property and assess their overall position. He added they are not affiliated with the County, and
30 they indicated their willingness to work with the City on other possible projects.
31
32 Mr. Mornson noted the District develops regional parks which are preferably at least 200 acres
33 but can be as small as 100 acres. He added that they expressed their opinion that the property
34 would not be suitable for a regional park as 1)their approval process is lengthy and time-
35 consuming; 2)their funding comes from bonding bill legislation which takes place next year, and
36 they are already requesting $26 million; and 3)the price is high.
37
38 Mr. Mornson stated the District has indicated willingness to work with the property's new
39 owners on a joint cooperative venture of some sort. He noted that the Salvation Army is in
40 negotiations with Heart of the Earth School.
41
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 10
1 Mr. Momson stated he also met with representatives from Heart of the Earth, who indicated they
.2 are in active negotiations and are close to getting a final purchase agreement drafted. He added
3 they expressed their willingness to cooperate with the city on accessibility issues and
4 collaborative efforts. He noted it agreed that school officials would attend a joint City
5 Council/School Board meeting to discuss their plans for the property if they purchase it.
6
7 Cavanaugh asked whether the City is actively involved in planning since the moratorium was
8 imposed, and whether the Planning Commission is being kept informed. Mr. Soth stated the City
9 should be studying possible future uses for the property and changes in the Comprehensive Plan.
10 He agreed the Planning Commission should be involved. Mr. Morrison agreed the Planning
11 Commission could study the issue and report back to the Council.
12
13 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None.
14
15 IX. NEW BUSINESS.
16 A. Resolution 99-041, re: Approval of a tax impact study for the Salvation Armypropertv.
17 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve Resolution 99-041, approving Springsted to
18 perform a tax impact study.
19
20 Motion carried unanimously.
21
22 B. Resolution 99-042, re: Approval of City's participation in the CDBG program.
23 Cavanaugh asked whether the City has pursued the possibility of participating in Ramsey
24 County's program. Mr. Morrison stated the City participates in both programs which are set up
25 differently.
26
27 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen to approve Resolution 99-042, authorizing the execution
28 of a joint cooperation agreement between the City of St. Anthony'and Hennepin County for
29 participation in the.Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program in
30 FY 2000-2002.
31
32 Motion carried unanimously.
33
34 C. Ordinance 1999-005, re: Park dedication(1st reading): and Resolution 99-043, re: Fees
35 for park dedication.
36 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve Ordinance 1999-005 (1st reading), relating to
37 parks, amending Chapter 7, by adding a Section 701 to the 1993 St. Anthony Code of
38 Ordinances.
39
40 Motion carried unanimously.
41
City Council Meeting Minutes
May 25, 1999
Page 11
i Mr. Soth requested the Council's consideration of issues which may arise with regard to the fees
2 before approving the 2nd reading of this ordinance. He added the issue of what,will be
3 considered in the 106/o designation should be clarified.
4
5 Mr. Soth stated the City's fees are all included in one ordinance rather than in resolutions, which
6 is not a good practice. He recommended the issue should be referred to the Planning
7 Commission. Mr. Mornson stated the ordinance was proposed as it is easier to amend via
8 resolution.
9
10 Motion by Marks, second by Thuesen to table Resolution 99-043, establishing park dedication
11 fees for the City of St. Anthony.
12
13 Motion carried unanimously.
14
15 X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
16 A. Ordinance 1999-004, re: Right-of-way management(2nd reading)_
17 Mr. Soth stated he was surprised at the length of the ordinance, which should be shorter to make
18 it easier to read and administer. Ranallo stated the ordinance was submitted-by the Cable
19 Commission's attorney, and all cities involved have adopted it. Mr. Soth stated he would refer
20 his wording comments to Mr. Momson.
21
22 Motion by Marks, second by Cavanaugh to approve Ordinance 1999-004, relating to managing
23 and regulating public right-of-way in the public interest and to provide for the issuance and
24 regulation of right-of-way permits by adding a new section 1165 to the 1993 St. Anthony Code
25 of Ordinances.
26
27 Motion carried unanimously.
28
29 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
30 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to adjourn the meeting at 8:38 P.M.
31
32 Motion carried unanimously.
33
34 Respectfully submitted,
35 Mary Mullen
36 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
37
38 Mayor
39
4o ATTEST:
41 City Clerk