HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 03212000 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
102862
BOX: 27
Folder: PL PACKETS 2000-2004
Document: PL PACKET 03212000
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
March 21 , 2000
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
PAGE(S)
I. CALL TO ORDER.
11 ROLL-CALL.
Ill. APPROVAL OF MARCH 21 , 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA.
IV. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 15, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 9
V. DESIGNATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE
TO THE APRIL. 11 , 2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
• VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. Nativity Lutheran Church; for 3312 Silver Lake Road;
setback variance 10 - 17
VII. CONCEPT REVIEWS.
A. AT&T Wireless Site Specialists - antenna 18 - 19
B. Nextel - antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - 30,
C. Pratt & Whitney - sign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 - 34
VIII. OTHER BUSINESS.
A. Apache Plaza Update; Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest
Development will introduce proposed zoning for Apache
and other updates 35 - 39
B. Lot Coverage Report; Commissioner Tillmann and
Todd Hubmer, WSB, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 - 43
C. Report on green space for St. Anthony Shopping Center.
D. Review of nonconforming structures and existing
ordinance.
E. Year 2000 Planning Commission Report and Goals. . . . . . . . 44 - 46
IX. COMMENTS.
• A. Commissioners.
Planning Commission Agenda
March 21 , 2000
Page 2
B. Staff.
1 . Salvation Army Camp property.
2. Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting - April 18.
3. Bus Tour - April 15, 2000.
X. ADJOURNMENT.
III. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 15, 2000 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
•
1
1
2 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
04 FEBRUARY 15, 2000
5 I. CALL TO ORDERIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
6 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Chair
7 Bergstrom.
8 II ROLL CALL.
9 Present: Chair Bergstrom; Vice Chair Melsha; Commissioners Tillmann,
10 Hanson, Thomas, Hatch, and Stille.
11 Commissioners absent: None.
12 Also present: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant.
13 III. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 15,2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
14 AGENDA.
15 Motion by Tillmann, second by Hanson, to approve the February 15, 2000 Planning Commission
16 Meeting Agenda as presented.
17 Motion carried unanimously.
018 IV. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 16,1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
19 Motion by Bergstrom,second by Hanson,to approve the November 16, 1999 Planning Commission
20 Meeting Minutes with the following modifications:
21 Page 3, Line 9, after "flower boxes." add "He made the garage thinner and longer so more area
22 would cover more of the driveway."
23 Page 3, Line 30, after "lot coverage" add"below the existing amount."
24 Motion carried unanimously.
25 V. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 18,2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
26 Motion by Hatch, second by Melsha, to approve the January 18, 2000 Planning Commission.
27 Meeting Minutes with the following modification:
28 Page 6,Line 20, after "into the plans" add"and also a large chunk of the green space was deleted."
29 Page 6, Line 20, change "Mr." to "Ms."
30 Motion carried unanimously.
031 VI. DESIGNATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE
32 FEBRUARY 22,2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
City of St. Anthony
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
Page 2
1 Chair Bergstrom requested that the designation of a Planning Commission Representative be ta-
e bled until the end of the meeting to determine if a representative.is needed to present issues at the
3 February 22, 2000 City Council meeting.
4 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
5 None.
6 VIII. OTHER BUSINESS.
7 A. Apache Plaza Update; Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest Development.
8 Chair Bergstrom welcomed Scott Tankenoff, managing partner of Hillcrest Development. Mr.
9 Tankenoff began by distributing copies of two articles from the Star Tribune entitled "Shopping
10 for Ways to Help Malls Survive" and "Minneapolis Likes High-Tech Campus Plan." Mr.
11 Tankenoff explained that the articles were for the Commission's information and that the second
12 article, in particular, discussed a current project in which Hillcrest Development is involved.
13 Mr. Tankenoff continued by stating that it is his intention to attend the Planning Commission
14 meetings as well as the City Council meetings on a regular basis in order to provide updates on
15 the status of the Apache Plaza redevelopment and answer questions.
06 Currently, Mr. Tankenoff stated, Hillcrest Development has a fully-signed purchase agreement
17 with US Bank and has met with City Staff to develop some preliminary concepts to bring for-
18 ward. Mr. Tankenoff stated that he is reluctant to release any details to the public at this time re-
19 garding the renderings and conceptual plans because the plans are still in the initial stage of
20 development and could undergo changes and modifications.
21 Furthermore, Mr. Tankenoff stated that there are several items currently being done, such as an
22 environmental review, geotechnical items to investigate, and various indoor items to investigate.
23 Hillcrest Development is in the process of contract reviews, lease reviews, physical review of the
24 structure, and other individual review items. Mr. Tankenoff estimated that approximately 50
25 days from this date, Hillcrest Development will have the results of the condition of the structure
26 of the property.
27 Mr. Tankenoff s final message about the project is that Hillcrest Development is enthusiastic
28 about the potential uses of the property, and also about providing an attractive area of which the
29 City and community could be proud.
30 Bergstrom commended Mr. Tankenoff on the prudent approach that Hillcrest Development is
31 taking. He continued by stating that the Apache property has been the focus of the City for many
32 years and there have been many hopes for the property that have resulted in disappointment.
0-3 Bergstrom asked Mr. Tankenoff to indicate the boundaries of the property for which Hillcrest
34 Development has purchased. Mr. Tankenoff proceeded to point out estimated boundaries on an
35 aerial map of the City that is on display in Council Chambers. He stated that the purchase agree-
36 ment entails approximately 31 acres of property, and included the New Market site.
City of St. Anthony
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
Page 3
1 Furthermore, Mr. Tankenoff stated that an accurate survey has not been obtained at this point, so
2 specific surveying figures were not available.
3 Tillmann noted that the City Council meeting minutes had indicated discussions about a possible
4 community meeting area and she asked for details from Mr. Tankenoff. He responded by stating
5 that it is his understanding that the citizens of the community desired a community space and this
6 concept is-being considered. The initial concept considered would include a type of recreational
7 area, meeting area, and a gathering point such as a coffee shop; however, even though the con-
8 cept of a community space is a priority with the conceptual plans, Mr. Tankenoff cautioned the
9 community to hold realistic expectations.
10 Tillmann inquired how the community space would be financed; i.e., would the City rent the
11 space or would other options be considered. Mr. Tankenoff stated that such an issue has been
12 discussed with City Staff and that has not been resolved at this time. However, he was optimistic
13 that a solution could be arranged and ongoing discussions would not prevent the community
14 space concept from being developed.
15 Additionally, Mr. Tankenoff indicated that the Apache property may have an area for craft
6 displays and craft shows and he.felt this expansion in development would be beneficial for the
community.
18 Tillmann asked how much parking would be needed for the property. Mr. Tankenoff stated that
19 the property appeared to generate adequate parking and at this point,he did not anticipate the
20 needed for additional parking, such as a parking ramp. The total need for parking would depend
21 upon the type of clients that move into the building.
22 Melsha stated that a May 2000 closing time had previously been mentioned and he inquired if
23 that continued to be a viable date. Mr. Tankenoff stated that May 2000 is still the target date, but
24 the closing depended upon the conceptual plans. Ideally, Mr. Tankenod stated he would like to
25 have identified some clients by that point and would like to plan construction to begin in the
26 Year 2000.
27 Thomas inquired if Mr. Tankenoff was concerned about competition for finding tenants for both
28 Apache Plaza and the development project on Stinson as well. Mr. Tankenoff responded that the
29 Stinson space is different than the Apache space and, generally speaking, would house different
30 types of clients.
31 Stille inquired about the absorption time frame that was anticipated for Apache. Mr. Tankenoff
32 responded that it was his intention was to meet with commercial real estate brokers to present the
3 project. After that point, it was his hope to make a meaningful dent in the tenant base within
4 three to five months of marketing the project to the brokers.
35 Bergstrom inquired if Hillcrest Development's policy was to custom build tenant space before or
36 after a tenant signed a lease. Mr. Tankenoff stated the Company would custom build the space
I
City of St. Anthony
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
Page 4
1 around the tenant's specific needs. Additionally, the Company would build a show space of ap-
2 proximately 2,000-4,000 square feet.
3 Bergstrom felt it was in the City's best interest to view the plans of Hillcrest Development in the
4 context of the entire property. Mr. Tankenoff responded that he believed that, at this point, the
5 New Market property should be considered ancillary and should support the final outcome of the
6 Apache property. In other words, Mr. Tankenoff stated that he would consider other options
7 with the New Market property once more of a concept is developed for the Apache property.
8 Bergstrom thanked Mr. Tankenoff for his interest, updates and input for the Apache property.
9 B. Lot Coverage Report; Commissioner Tillmann and Staff.
10 Tillmann directed the Commission's attention to her report entitled "Proposal to Change the Lot
11 Coverage Ordinances." By way of background, Tillmann explained that the purpose behind
12 changing the lot coverage ordinances was so that the Commission was not forced to review crite-
13 ria on a case-by-base basis. This is reinforced by the fact that last fall, the Commission heard
14 two similar variance requests. Both were requests for variances from the lot coverage maximum
15 and both properties in question had undersized lots. In addition, both properties were above the
6 maximum 35% lot coverage limit.
17 Tillmann continued by stating that the Commission is likely to have similar requests in the future
18 and, rather than reviewing each request separately, develop a criteria that can be applied consis-
19 tently. This would allow for the improvement of homes in St. Anthony without adversely affect-
20 ing the storm water control efforts. The goal of the ordinance change would be to reduce the
21 number of variance requests to only those that represent extraordinary circumstances.
22 Tillmann stated that there are two components of the lot coverage limit. One is the maximum
23 percentage of coverage allowed (currently 35%). The other is the definition of impervious sur-
24 face or what is counted in calculating the lot coverage. Currently, any surface or structure is
25 counted.
26 Tillmann's report offered two options:
27 . 1) Clarify the "impervious surface" definition to more clearly state that it includes all
28 surfaces and structures (including decks); and increase the lot coverage maximum for lots that
29 are below the current requirements of 75 feet in width and 9,000 square feet in area to 40%. The
30 advantage of this option is simplicity.
31 2) Change the "impervious surface" definition to exclude decks (and possibly patios) that
32 meet certain requirements, and leave the lot coverage maximum at 35%. The advantage of this
03 option is that it more closely follows the intent of the lot coverage limit to reduce storm water
34 runoff by excluding surfaces that do not affect runoff.
35 Management Assistant Kim Moore-Sykes stated that she has spoken with Todd Hubmer of WSB
{ City of St. Anthony
i
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
Page 5
1 & Associates and noted that Tillmann had been working with Mr. Hubmer on this project as
2 well. Ms. Moore-Sykes mentioned that Mr. Hubmer would be available to attend the Planning
3 Commission meeting in March to discuss the impact of modifying the lot coverage ordinances on
4 the stormwater runoff and retention.
5 In that respect, Bergstrom directed Ms. Moore-Sykes to arrange with Mr. Hubmer for him to at-
6 tend the March 2000 Planning Commission meeting and to coordinate the arrangement with City
7 Manager Michael Mornson.
8 Bergstrom thanked Tillmann for her report and Ms. Moore-Sykes for her assistance.
9
10 C. Report on Green Space for St. Anthony Shopping g enter.
11 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated she wished to provide an update for the Commission on the current
12 status of the green space for the St. Anthony Shopping Center.
13 City Staff had met with some consultants regarding developing the green space, and ultimately
14 made a recommendation to the City Council to select BRW do provide the landscape planning
15 for the open space. Most of the spring would be devoted to developing the plan and concepts.
�6 Bergstrom asked if the City had an executed Developers Agreement with The Hitching Post.
17 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that the City has two development agreements in place. One is with
18 The Hitching Post and the other is with the owners of the Shopping Center
19 Both Tillmann and Bergstrom inquired if the Parks Commission is going to be involved in the
20 development of the green space. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that it is planned that the Parks
21 Commission have involvement, but it was her understanding that the main role will fall to the
22 City Staff, City Council, and BRW.
23 As an aside, Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that the owners of Dairy Queen have approached City Staff
24 with designs and plans for a renovation. She stated that the plans indicate excellent ideas and ap-
25 pear complimentary to the overall renovation of the Shopping Center.
26 On a related subject, Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Jim Kellison, the development contractor for
27 The Hitchin Post, had contacted her. Mr. Kellison offered that renovation for The Hitching Post
28 is moving along at a fast pace and the store planned to open within a couple of weeks.
29 D. Discuss Need for Planner for Apache Site.
30 Bergstrom stated that he recently had a conversation with City Manager Michael Momson re-
31 garding hiring a planner to work with the City and Hillcrest Development. The intention would
32 be to frame the Apache project so that it works for both the City and Hillcrest Development from
0,3 a planning standpoint. It was Bergstrom's concern that the City needed to develop some con-
34 ceptual ideas to coordinate with Hillcrest Development's conceptual plans.
35 Furthermore, Bergstrom stated that on Friday, February 18, 2000, there is a retreat with the City
City of St. Anthony 6
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
. Page 6
1 Council, department heads, Chair of the Parks Commission, and he would be attending as the
2 Chair of the Planning Commission. He anticipated that he would be able to approach the subject
3 of hiring a planner for the City's interest. He reminded the Commission that the City had hired
4 Richard Krier to assist with the design of the Shopping Center on the City's behalf.
5 E. Possible Variance for Nativity Lutheran Church.
6 Ms. Moore-Sykes reviewed for the Commission the facts surrounding the sign at Nativity
7 Lutheran Church. In the 1960's, the Church installed an identification sign before the City
8 adopted a sign ordinance in later years.
9 In September 1999, a representative from Nativity Lutheran Church contacted City Staff and
10 filed a sign permit with the intention of changing the sign so that it would be easier to maintain
11 as well as have a more updated appearance. The Church did not plan to change the dimensions,
12 location, footings, electrical wiring or the base of the sign.
13 In the meantime, a resident contacted the City and complained that the Church's sign was placed
14 in the right of way and was therefore in noncompliance with the City's sign ordinance. Upon
15 further review by City Staff, it was determined that the prior sign and the newly updated sign
6 were indeed in the right of way; however, upon further review, it was determined that the
7 church's previous sign had been installed prior to the existence of the current City ordinance and
18 thus had been grandfathered in.
19 In any event, City Staff found that Section 1400.08, Subd. 15 allows for the replacement of
20 existing business identification signs. An important point is that the previous sign was not de-
21 molished, but simply updated.
22 Bergstrom clarified the facts with Ms. Moore-Sykes: 1)the new sign was simply rebuilt in the
23 same place, using the existing electrical pad, footings and base, and utilizing the dimensions of
24 the existing sign; and 2) the previous sign had been built before the existing sign ordinance.
25 Hatch inquired if the City found it necessary to grant a variance for the placement of the sign,
26 would the City be held responsible if damage occurred to the sign because the sign was placed in
27 the right of way.
28 In that respect, Bergstrom directed Management Assistant Ms. Moore-Sykes to obtain an opinion
29 from City Attorney William Soth to address if the process of rebuilding and updating the sign for
30 Nativity Lutheran would trigger the need for the removal of a nonconforming structure. In addi-
31 tion, if the City proceeded with the variance process, and approved a variance for a sign in the
32 right of way, would the City be responsible for damages caused to the sign due to the sign being
3 in the right of way.
34 Thomas commented that the Commission might consider as a matter of policy adopting some
35 standard principles regarding nonconforming structures that are currently in existence.
s
City of St. Anthony
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
Page 7
1 Bergstrom directed Management Assistant Ms. Moore-Sykes to add a review of nonconforming
2 structures and existing ordinances as an agenda item for the March 2000 Planning Commission
3 meeting.
4 F. Concept Review for Wireless Site Specialists.
5 Ms. Moore-Sykes directed the Commission's attention to a letter dated February 9, 2000 from
6 Wireless Site Specialists, Inc., a contractor for AT&T Wireless Services. AT&T is interested in
7 placing cellular antennas on a commercial structure (known as Apache Medical Building) at
8 4001 Stinson Boulevard. AT&T proposes to install three antenna mounts with 1 to 4 antennas
9 per array.
10 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that the contractor requested a concept review for the Planning Com-
11 mission meeting scheduled for March 21, 2000.
12 Thomas asked if Ms. Moore-Sykes was aware of any public discussions regarding the aesthetics
13 of antennas. In that respect, Bergstrom directed Management Assistant Ms. Moore-Sykes to re-
14 search similar past situations and place her findings in the meeting package for the next meeting.
#6 G. Year In Review.
Bergstrom distributed a list of 1999 goals for Planning Commission consideration. This list was
17 put together last year and he requested that at the beginning of each year, a new list be
18 developed. Before putting together a list for the Planning Commission for the Year 2000,
19 Bergstrom would like to attend the City Council retreat on February 18 to discover the goals and
20 mission of the new Council, which could include identifying the Council's mission for the
21 Planning Commission.
22 Thomas inquired if the City Council would be setting its own goals for the future. Ms. Moore-
23 Sykes offered that traditionally the Council utilizes the retreat in part to develop strategic goals
24 and a vision for the future.
25 IX. COMMENTS.
26 A. Commissioners.
27 Stille wanted to wish Ms. Moore-Sykes well in her new employment with the City of Ramsey.
28
29 Hatch echoed Stille's well wishes for Ms. Moore-Sykes. Additionally, he commented about the
30 role of the new fire chief. Specifically, Hatch inquired if the new chief would be in charge of
31 code enforcement issues or if that responsibility would be passed on to another department.
32 Bergstrom responded that it was his hope that the issue would be discussed at the City Council
3 retreat on Friday, February 18.
34 Additionally, Hatch inquired of Ms. Moore-Sykes if the firm of BRW, Inc. had been approached
35 about providing GIS information to the City, since BRW would have that information available
36 from prior work done for the City. Ms. Moore-Sykes made a note to contact BRW to inquire
City of St. Anthony
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
. Page 8
1 about that arrangement.
2 Tillmann wished Ms..Moore-Sykes success in her new employment with the City of Ramsey.
3 Hanson stated that the Planning Commission would miss Ms. Moore-Sykes and her contributions
4 to City government, and he wished her luck.
5 Thomas offered his congratulations to Ms. Moore-Sykes and stated that he has enjoyed meeting
6 her and working with her since his appointment as a Planning Commissioner.
7 In regard to the earlier discussion regarding the potential need for a planner for the City, Thomas
8 felt that it was important to look at the Apache property as a planned development. In other
9 words, if the City could promote the development of the entire site, it could bring the community
10 together and Thomas felt that St. Anthony was in a position to capture that energy and
I1 momentum.
12 Melsha expressed his congratulations on Ms. Moore-Sykes' new opportunity.
#3 Additionally, Melsha reported that he agreed with the idea of hiring a planner for the Apache
4 property. He felt that Hillcrest'Development is ahead of the City in conceptual plans and a plan-
15 ner's input and ideas would be beneficial for the City. Community input would also be helpful
16 and Melsha suggested a public hearing.
17 Chair Bergstrom presented Ms. Moore-Sykes with a card that had been signed by all of the Plan-
18 ning Commissioners and wished her well in her new job. Ms. Moore-Sykes expressed thanks to
19 the Commissioners and stated that her experience with the Planning Commission has been valu-
20 able.
21 Bergstrom reminded the Commission that there is an Open House scheduled for Friday, March 3,
22 2000 from 2:30-5:00 at the Community Center. The Open House will bid farewell to Ms.
23 Moore-Sykes, and congratulate Dick Johnson, Fire Chief, on his retirement.
24 Bergstrom directed the Commission's attention to a letter dated October 26, 1999 from the City
25 of Roseville regarding a request for proposals. Specifically, Bergstrom asked the Commission to
26 view page 2, last paragraph, wherein it stated that the City of Roseville's redevelopment policy is
27 to facilitate private sector redevelopment without assuming an official stake in the chain of title.
28 The City's strategy is to provide a comprehensive development framework and the necessary in-
29 frastructure for the redevelopment area to attract private sector redevelopment investment.
30 Bergstrom explained that the letter is an example of how a city is taking charge of redevelopment
0,1 without taking charge of the title. Bergstrom planned on distributing a copy of the letter to the
32 City Staff and City Council as well.
33 B. Staff.
City of St. Anthony
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2000
Page 9
1 1. Salvation Army Camp Property.
2 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that there have not been any new developments on the Salvation
3 Army property .
4
5 Stille inquired if a planner needed to be considered for that property. Bergstrom re-
6 sponded that the City would need to set aside funds for a planner for Apache and possibly .
7 for the Salvation Army property as well. One question that would arise, Bergstrom
8 stated, is the entity that would be responsible for the planner.
9 2. Bus Tour(April 15).
10 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that City Manager Michael Momson thought it would be a good
11 idea to have the bus tour in conjunction with the joint meeting. Ms. Moore-Sykes had
12 checked with Public Works Director Jay Hartman about obtaining a bus and he responded
13 that the City of New Brighton had been cooperative in the past to allow the City to use
14 the vans and busses available. Ms. Moore-Sykes reminded the Commission that she
15 would need a count of the number of people that would be attending the bus tour.
16
17 Bergstrom is looking forward to viewing examples of both positive and negative issues--
8 for example, property maintenance, both commercial and residential.
�9
20 Tillmann stated that she would like to see examples of companies that currently have con-
21 ditional use permits.
22 Thomas inquired if the Commission would discuss a possible route for the bus tour.
23 Bergstrom directed Ms. Moore-Sykes to place that item on next month's agenda.
24
25 3. Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting=April 18.
26 Ms. Moore-Sykes reminded the Commission that a joint meeting with the City Council
27 would take place on April 18, 2000. Although this is the Commission's regular monthly
28 meeting, Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that, in the past,the meeting has begun earlier than
29 usual to allow for extra time.
30 Stille reminded the Commission that the Volunteer Dinner is scheduled for April 28,
31 2000. Ms. Moore-Sykes added that the evening has always been enjoyable and involves
32 some type of entertainment, motivational speaker, and excellent food.
33 X. ADJOURNMENT.
34 Motion by Stille, second by Melsha, to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
35 Motion carried unanimously.
36 Sue Selseth
37 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
1®
STAFF REPORT
. To: Planning Commission
From: Michael J. Morrison, City Manager
Date: March 21, 2000
Subject: Setback Variance for Nativity Lutheran Church Sign
BACKGROUND
On September 9, 1999, a representative from Nativity Lutheran Church, 3312 Silver Lake Road,
and the sign contractor filed a sign permit with staff in order to "change sign out front". In
talking to the church representative, they indicated that they were only intending to change the
sign so that it would be easier to maintain and have a more updated appearance. They indicated
that they were not changing the dimensions or its location, that the footings, electrical wiring and
base would remain the same.
In reviewing the City's sign ordinance, Section 1400.08, Subd. 15 allows for the replacement of
existing business identification signs. It states that "a business.identification sign designed to
replace an existing business identification sign which lawful exists under this Code [is permitted],
so long s the new sign has the same dimensions and is in the same location as the existing sign,
g g g
and is not a prohibited sign under Section 1400.007." In looking at Section 1400.007, Subd. 4
states that it is prohibited to have signs within the Public Right-of-Wayor Public Easement. At
the time that the sign permit was approved, Staff mistakenly thought the right-of-way was 15
feet and thus making the sign conforming.
A resident called on January 25, 2000, questioning the Church's sign and its possible placement
in the right-of-way. The resident felt that it violated the sign code in several areas: landscaping,
design and location. Kim Moore-Sykes explained that the contractor was not finished with the
project, that the design calls for end caps so that the sign's width is consistent from base to sign
surface; that the landscaping will be completed in the spring when the contractor can do the
required plantings; and that I would have someone measure the sign's proximity to the public
right-of-way.
In checking with the Public Works Director, it was determined that the right-of way on Silver
Lake Road is 33 feet, which represents half of the road width. Silver Lake Road is 66 feet wide.
The Public Works staff measured the sign at 29 feet from the road centerline, making the sign 4
feet in the right-of-way.
. I have attached a copy of the original sign permit and plans to this report.
1�
ANALYSIS
The Nativity Church was constructed in 1958 and at approximately the same time, the sign was
installed. Since the City's Ordinance was not codified until 1976, both the Church and their
•
identifying g si sign " randfathered in" with regard to the setback re q uirements of the
Ordinance. Glenn Seefeldt, Pastor of Nativity Lutheran Church, submitted a Petition for
Variance to the front yard setback requirement to allow the Church's identifying sign to continue
to exist in its present location.
The State Statute and the City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request: that the proposed variance would relieve an undue hardship; that
the proposed variance would be-used to correct an extraordinary circumstance which is not
applicable to another property in the vicinity or zoning district; and that the hardship was caused
by the City Ordinance and granting the variance would not alter the essential character of the
locality. The Church's sign has continued to exist in its present location since the Church was
constructed in the late 1950's. In its present location, it has not caused nor does it cause any
public safety issues for those traversing Silver Lake Road.
12
Date:
. Fee:
R-1 . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
Applicant: &),4 U u- i ra ti— Phone: (g �
Address: u v
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): Qwn.4
Legal Description of property proposed for variance:
Street Address:
Presently Zoned: e L,+"Oj
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions_of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance would relieve an undue hardship, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced./ 1, /Relo(oce r'—d— -01- 2k l's f A�J S�qN t�S�•�p c�v�Sii�c. of/�/�alr
et Q!P C!`i' o- /, a• fYi awC y+"���- o G.i/v/� /'e X
ti-o� -
i.L Oc�r �c��.v Ctrou 3, ( o o XE,.` Su r�. U(�.
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district.
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
V—Z i
Signatur of App ica t
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SETBACK VARIANCE
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing
on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, for the following
purpose:
Applicant: Nativity Lutheran Church
. Address: for 3312 Silver Lake Road
Request: A 4 foot setback variance to the City's front yard setback
requirement.
Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at
said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the
Management Assistant 789-8881. Auxiliary aids are available upon request at
least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk at 789-8881 to make
arrangements.
Michael Mornson
City Manager
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
March 1, 2000
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 14
3301-Silver Lake Road/,S#.Anthony, MN 55418 / (612) 789-8881 • FAX (612) 781-9323
BUILDING PERMIT No. 4417
JOB ADDRESS ! PROPERTY-I.D.NO.
LEGAL�LN BLK. , TRACT (�SEE -7 ATTACHED SHEET)
UNPLATTEO PROPERTY
1 DESC.
2 OWNER b1A14ADO RESS� / / ZIP PH
CONTRACTOR MAILADDRESS bG ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO.
/7
3
ARCHITECT / / MAILADDRESS' ZIP PHONE REG.NO.
4 (��
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE REG.NO.
5
MECHANICAL ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE REG.NO.
6
USE OF BUILDING CATEGORY: 1 0 2 O
7
B CLASS OF WORK: 0 NEW 0 ADDITION 0 ALTERATION 0 REPAIR 0 GARAGE 0 OTHER
g DESCRIBE WORK: ` ae(� l ' ,� dl�
C F N SOT FEET S ORIESL�/�C-rlLe'�� ' J
10 OCCUPANCY TYPE OF CONST
NO.OF REQUIRED
11 ZONING DWEWNG UNITS PARKING
12 LOT COVERAGE
VALUATION OF WORK S
a SPECIAL CONDITIONS
PERMIT FEE................................................:.....................S )
C%C
PLANCHECK FEE............................................................S
STATESURCHARGE........................................................S
SACCHARGE(UNITS).....................................................S
SEWER..............................................................................S
WATER...............................................................................S
LICENSEFEE....................................................................S
OTHER...............................................................................$
PENALTY...........................................................................E
TOTAL FEE PAID...............................................S
RECEIPT NO. DATE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING,HEATING,VENTI-
LATING OR AIR CONDITIONING AND FIRE SPRINKLERS.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED
IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION
ENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS ATAN YTI E AFTER WORK S
COMMENCED.
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW
THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HERIN OR NOT THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHOR-
ITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW
REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
SIGNATURE OF ONTRXCTOR THORIZED AGENT (DAT
SIGNATU OF WNER (IF OWN B IL R) )ATE)
• • •
c�%=i��Sa., , �i1�1rt}10"RMI IS /�� (.i C� ® • "
- Wit+° •
I I
/ I
' � f - 'Y �` •'+ { w3 ,t �irr�":` - 'i +£% `rte r .f _ rrs it
'-c fit=, e.��rG 3�?� - •y
� I7i? �. .':-S , °Z W
Zo
^"ri `' p, _ f'..• "r r. ��_ 'c
i'.�1z''r' �-_ � -e•� '+��;i_,r•�s � '< _� �ti
III mix
m 113 FAR
Eli
- - h
1'
i
i
k � -
.,
-
?i-tea' 's�''
ON ._.rte�... �..C•�
16
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
• MINNEAPOLIS PILLSBURY CENTER SOUTH BILLINGS
NEW YORK 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET GREAT FALLS
SEATTLE MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA $$402-1498 MISSOULA
DENVER TELEPHONE: (612) 340-2600 BRUSSELS
WASHINGTON,D.C. FAX: (612) 340-2868 FARGO
DES MOINES WILLIAM R.SOTH HONG KONG
ANCHORAGE (612)340-2969 ROCHESTER
LONDON FAX(612)340-2644 SALT LAKE CITY
soth.william@dorseylaw.com
COSTA MESA VANCOUVER
March 1, 2000
Michael J. Morrison
City Manager
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Re: Sign for Nativity Lutheran Church
. Dear Mike:
You have asked for my advice regarding the identification sign for Nativity Lutheran Church. I
have reviewed this with Kim Moore-Sykes and believe that I understand the background. I have also
reviewed the Planning Commission minutes of February 15 and the Planning Commission's questions of
whether under the circumstances it would appropriate for the City to consider a variance for the sign.
As I understand it, the sign is non-conforming and the church wishes to make alterations which would
make it easier to maintain and give it a more updated appearance. Apparently,they are not changing
the dimensions or location of the sign, and the footings, electrical wiring and base would remain the
same. Kim concluded that under Section 1400.08, Subd. 15, they could replace an existing business
identification sign so long as the sign has the same dimensions, is in the same location and is not a
prohibited sign under Section 1400.07.
Under Section 1400.07, Subd. 4, signs within the public right of way are prohibited. Kim
thought the right-of-way was 15 feet on the church side and that the sign therefore was not in the right-
of-way. She later learned that the right-of-way on Silver Lake Road is 33 feet wide on the church side
of the road, and that the sign was 4 feet into the right-of-way.
You and the Planning Commission have,raised the question of whether the City should consider
a variance for the alterations to the sign. If the sign is considered to be a non-conforming structure, it
. may be continued only so long as it remains otherwise lawful and complies with the provisions of
Section 1660.02. Under this section, it may not be "enlarged, extended, reconstructed, replaced or
17
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Michael J. Mornson
March 1, 2000
Page 2
moved, except to change it to a conforming use." As I understand it, the sign is being altered, but it is
not being enlarged, extended, replaced or moved. It is not clear whether the sign is being
"reconstructed". If the City concludes that it is not being"reconstructed", it could be deemed to be
permitted under Section 1660.02, Subd. 1. If this is not clear, however, the City could always
consider a variance. If this is done, the issue would be whether it would constitute a hardship to
relocate the sign to move it off the right-of-way.
Whether the City determines that a variance is needed or not, if the sign will continue to be
located in the right-of-way, I would recommend that an agreement be entered into with the church in a
form similar to that which I prepared for the Hobart Swan property, to provide the church with a
license to continue the sign in the City right-of-way under certain conditions. This would make it clear
that the City would have the right to require the church to move the sign if it deemed that it was a safety
hazard or if it otherwise was in the City's best interest to have the sign moved for widening of the road,
snow storage, etc. In such an agreement, we can.provide that the church would indemnify the City for
any claims related to the presence of the sign in the right-of-way as we did with respect to the Hobart
Swan property.
I hope this answers the questions you had, but if you have any further questions, please let me
know.
Very truly your ,
4
William R. Soth
WRS/ms
VII. CONCEPT REVIEWS.
1�
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 16, 2000
TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: CONCEPT REVIEW: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA
Julie Townsend of Wireless Site Specialist, Inc., (WSS) is working with AT&T Wireless in
determining an appropriate site for telecommunications antennas in St. Anthony. Ms.
Townsend has been discussing the possibilities of installing three antenna mounts on the
Apache Medical Building at 4001 Stinson. She has also contacted the owner of the Apache
Medical Building.
Ms. Townsend has been advised that because this site is privately owned, AT& T will be
required to obtain a conditional use permit. Attached is her letter outlining her proposal. Ms.
Townsend will be in attendance to answer questions and review the installation proposal.
19
Wireless Site Specialists, Inc.
February 9, 2000
City of St. Anthony
Kim Moore-Sykes
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1603
RE: Application for Special Condition Use Permit
Dear Ms. Moore-Sykes,
AT&T Wireless Services is interested in filing an application for a special condition use
permit to allow for cellular antennas to be placed on a commercial structure
approximately 55 feet tall. The subject property, currently zoned commercial, is located
at 4001 Stinson Boulevard. AT&T will propose to install three antenna mounts with 1 to
4 antennas per array.
A Radio Frequency Engineer for AT&T has determined this area to be lacking sufficient
cellular coverage. The area of focus to consider placing antennas was along Silver Lake.
Road, most specifically nearest to Apache Plaza. AT&T has considered trying to use the
existing US WEST pole located on 37`h Street, but the monopole is not tall enough to
support AT&T's antennas.
I expect to submit information by 3/15/00 in order to have a Concept Review on 3/21/00,
the application discussed at Planning Commission 4/18/00 and final approval/denial at
the 4/25/00 City Council meeting.
I will be representing AT&T during the application process and will be attending all
meetings regarding the application. I can also be contacted with questions or comments
at 612-851-7877.
Sincerely,
u ie Townsend
Contractor, AT&T Wireless Services
cc. Michael Morrison
2850 Metro Drive Suite 250 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55425 • PH: 612.851.7877 Fax: 612.858.7377
2®
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 16, 2000
TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: CONCEPT REVIEW: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNAS
This request is similar to the previous conditional use request from AT&T Wireless Services.
Nextel Communications proposes to install three sets of antennas atop the Apache Medical
Building at 4001 Stinson Boulevard.
Mr. Jim Nelson, agent for Nextel Communications, has submitted the attached information
concerning this request and will be present at the March 21 meeting to answer questions and
review the proposal.
21
E UELL CONSULTING., INC.
905 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 210 Site Acquisition
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102-4740 Permitting
(651) 225-0792 site Management
Fax (651) 225-0795
March 14,2000
Michael Morrison
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony,MN 55418-1699
RE: Application for Special Condition Use Permit
Dear Michael,
I have been asked by Nextel Communications to assist them in gaining the necessary approvals to build a
wireless antenna site for their Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio(ESMR)telecommunication network.
ESMR combines the technology of a two-way radio system,wireless telephone and pager into one small
handset.Nextel Communications is one of the largest ESMR providers in the United States.This site is
necessary to provide improved wireless communications service to residents as well as visitors to and
through the St. Anthony area.
Nextel Communications has reached an agreement with the owner of the property located at 4001 Stinson
Blvd., (commonly known as the Apache Medical Center),for a rooftop location on which to place 3 sets of
panel antennas.
Each of the three sets(sectors)of antennas will have 3 panels measuring approximately 8 ft'in height by 8
@ inches in width Each of the three sectors will measure about 13 feet across,forming a single triangle(tri-
sector rooftop frame)upon which the panels will be mounted.The top of each antenna will be 15 feet
above the roof of the mechanical equipment penthouse.The radio and telephony equipment will consist of
equipment racks;A/C and lights,all contained in an I lx 20 ft(approx. 10 ft in height)modular building
placed on the roof. The equipment building will have an exterior finish to complement the existing
structure. Both the equipment building and the Antenna array will be located near the center(north to
south)of the roof The building will be placed on the main roof at approximately 50 feet above grade and
the antennas will be located on the roof of the mechanical equipment penthouse at approximately 63 feet
above grade.
I am submitting this information in order to meet the requirements for a concept review with the Planning
Commission on March 21,2000. It is our understanding that if approved,we would be on the April 18`h
Planning Commission agenda for a Public Hearing of our request. Final approval/denial would be given at
the April 25ffi City Council meeting.
I will be representing Nextel during the application process and will be attending all meetings regarding the
application. I may be reached at 763-784-5187 or via EMAIL at jn4wsr @aol.com
Sincerely,
gimNelson
Agent for Nextel Lications
22
Date:March 14,2000 Fee: $130.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Applicant: Jim Nelson for Nextel Communications Phone: 763-784-5187
Address: 9401 James Avenue South Suite 210 Bloomington MN 55431 (Nextel)
Street address and/or legal description of property in question: Apache Medical Center 4001 Stinson Blvd St.
Anthony NIN 55421 LOT 1,BLOCK 2,Apache Plaza
Zoning district in which propel ly is located: Commercial
Conditional Use proposed: Installation of a roof top wireless telephone antenna site to improve coverage/service for
residents and visitors to the area
. Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions be satisfied before a
conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using additional sheets, if
necessary.
1) The proposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning district in which it
is to be located. There is no specific mention of this type of use listed in your Section 1600"zoning code" except as
referenced in Section 1650.04 "Height Limit Exceptions" There we find mention of antennas and towers. The
subject of Antennas and Towers are more specifically discussed in Section 1160.As noted in Section 1160.02, a
permit application must be made with the City and approval granted prior to construction of this antenna facility.
Section 1160.04 states"General Requirements".
Subd. 1. Nextel will comply with the State Building Code.
Subd. 2. Grounding protection will be applied to protect people and property against a direct lightning strike.
Subd. 3.Antennas will be in compliance with the required distance from overhead power lines as no overhead
power line crosses'the building rooftop.
Subd. 4. This rooftop is secure from unauthorized person's access.
Subd. 5. This site will have no permanent lighting of any kind except that which may be required to repair site
in an emergency.
Subd.6. Construction materials used in the equipment building as well as the antenna support structures are
of a non-corrosive, non-combustible material and uses no wood.
Subd. 7. This installation will not extend or encroach on any part of a street,sidewalk or alley.
2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health,safety,or general welfare of persons residing
or working in the vicinity or furious to property values or improvements in the vicinity. A rooftop installation
® such as the one we are proposing at this site will without question have the lease impact of any alternative structure
such as ground build tower, or water tank There will be no equipment placed on the ground.Everything will be
placed on the building roof and become a part of the building.
23
t
3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a service or a facility,
which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the.neighborhood or
community. The primary purpose for the installation of this wireless site is to accommodate the needs of the
area residents and of those visitors to and around the general area of St. Anthony. This Site is designed to
provide better and more efficient coverage for those subscribers to Nextel's mobile telephone offerings.
4) Section 1160.06 Height Restrictions, Subd. 2. (b)Non-Residential Zone Districts: Nextel's antennas including
their mounting equipment will not exceed 16 feet in height. This is 2 feet under your stated limit of 18 feet This
Section appears to be more specific and more restrictive than the reference to height found in Section 1650.04
Signature of applicant:
Encl.
• Application letter
• Completed application form and fee
• Drawing if Site including 4 building elevations, power and telephone
SAO),
. ENGBNING
March 13,2000
Mr.Bob Friend
Nextel
9401 James Avenue South
Suite 180
Bloomington,MN 554431
Mr.Len Lampert
Lampert AreWteen
13837 NE Lincoln St.
Ham.Lake,MN 55304
Re:Nextel Equipment installation(Hart Lake MN 0171)
Location:Apache Medical Building
4001 Stinson Blvd.
St A moony.MN 55421
Dear Gentlemen-
This letter is to confirm that I have completed my investigation and analysis of the
proposed roof top location for a Nextcl communications equipment installation site on the
. Apache Medical Building located at 4001 Stinson Blvd. in St.Anthony,VIN.The roof
framing for this building is a cast in place coaarete joist,beans and slab system.The
proposed co=nwdcations equipment room will be located adjacent to the existing
equipamw on the roof.
According to my calculations,the concrete roof frAraing at the proposed Nextel
equipment location can safely support uniform loads of at least 90 psf.The
communieadons egntpmcat in*e typical Nextel enclosure vibich consists of radio
cabine%tectifiers,coatroUrs and batteries is housed in a steel stud game enclosure
about 11 R by 20&in plan.The total weight of the equipment and the enclosure is about
14,000 Ibs which is supported on fow WSx10 steel beam that will unifortuly distribute
do weigh to the roof deck(approximately 65 psf uniform load).331 U Avm floral SWt 2W MimaWs.MN 55501 612.341.9372 612-M47851a ftOwgiwrtr1VwditLATT.r4t
25
Nextel Equipment Installaaion
. Hart Lake MA10171 (Apache Medical Building)
Psge 2
In addition to ft cotamunications equipment shelter on the main roof,a panel antenna
.mount will be placed on the roof of the penthouse. The"steel mount is triangular in plan.
approximately.13 R•per side and is designed to support nine panel antennas weighing 25
lbs.each.The mount will be thru-bohed to the existing precast plank roof of the
penthouse.The mount is designed for 100 mph wind loads and'/:"of radial icc build-up.
In say opinion,the proposed Mwnunicadow equipment shelter and antennas can be
safely supported on the roof of this building w indicated without adversely affecting the
structtual integrity of rite building.
Picric feel free to contact me with any questions or comments regarding thus report oc if 1
can be of any further service in this matter.
Sincerely,
n,vmrur�
Satoh Esgineaing AFC G.•
� � vim. .•.',G �
r ,ADicS$jONA_
EW-KER :OLT
Bernie Stroh, P.E. `f' 14269 '
• : C'
•
M1(XUfLZCT . BE
Anchor Bolt Kit Installation Procedure 27
for Rooftop rame for or R ooftop Anchor bolt Kit
dhe Anchor Bolt Kits provide a set of four 7/8"diameter 1. Carefully cut and roR back the roofing material.if there
readed rod anchors,with a 3"(76 mm)square back-up is insulation,cut out a piece 8" (203 mm)square.
plate,and the necessary hardware. 2. Chip off the surface of the concrete in the 8"(203 mm)
For installation guidelines,see the"Installation Procedure square.
for Rooftop Anchor Bolt Kit,"following. 3. Drill a 1-1/8"(29 mm)diameter hole through the roof '
and install the anchor bolt,placing the 3"(76 mm)
square x 3/8"(10 mm)thick back-up plate,washer,
and nut on the lower end of the bolt.
4. Paint the 8"(203 mm)square with grout,install form,
and pour concrete. Adjust the height of pad so that
anchor-bolt projection remains 2-1/4"(57 mm).
5. Tops of pads shall be level with each other within 1/4"
(6 mm).
6.After concrete has cured;paint the top pads with B193
Roofing Compound(p. 13.04)install B1100 or
74r as 81101 Roof Flashing Cans(p. 13.02)over the
tin roofing,and seal roofing as required,using the B193
Roofing Compound.
Product APAor maximum
Number lot,Lea 6 Roof T6ic6fts Frame ar Tripea 8'so 1203 mm)
92061 # 1'6'(457 mm) 0'(203 mm) ease hate
92061 2'(610 mm) 1'2'(356 mm) CWwo"3.000
psi(20.7 a,Pa) 2•lr4'SS1 mm)
:069 3'(9L4 mm) 2'2'(660 mm) FlnhirG ea
r+oonne 6•(152 mm)
-_
"g.0
Mr did
arxt+o�OoR
• •
Rnn nn Gam......• -fn..
TOT)L P,05
MB-ItUrMU Antenna
i
26
Tri-Sector Rooftop Frame 3-Leg Tri-Sector Rooftop Frame —
for Anchored Installation with Climbing Ladder & Platform
. The Tri-Sector Rooftop Frames enable installation of up for Anchored Installation
to twelve panel antennas for three sectors on one rooftop, Three Leg Rooftop Frame provides mounting locations for
three-leg structure.The Frames,available In six heights up to twelve 2-7/8"(73 mm)OD mounting pipes.The
from 5'(1.524 m)to 30'(9.144 m),are secured to the Frame is designed to support up to forty-eight 2'(610 mm)
roof using separately ordered Anchor Bolt Kits,below diameter shielded antennas. Design loading,per TIA/
Frame members,with lengths of 10'(3-048 m)or less, EW22F, is for 100 mph(161knt/hr)basic wind speed,
are easily transported to the roof by elevator. 1/2"(13mm)radial ice and a roof elevation of 100'.
Antenna separation with four antennas on a sector is 4' (30.48m)abovc grade line_
(1.219 m),with an outside-antenna separation of 12' The Frame is secured to the roof using separately ordered
(3.658 m).When mounting three antennas per sector,an Anchor Bolt Kits(p•22.08). Frame members,with
alternate center-antenna location provides for a 6' lengths of 10'(3.048 m)or less,can be transported to the
(1.829 m)antenna separation. roof by elevator.An inside climbing ladder and a platform
Wireless panel antennas mount to the Frames on sepa. with access hatch is included.
rately ordered 2-3/8"(60 mm)OD Antenna-Mounting Antennas mount to the fra me on separately ordered
Pipes(p. 22.04)available in five lengths from 4'(1.219 m) 2.7/80(73 mm)OD Antenna-Mounting-Pipes(p. 22.04)
to 11'(3.353 m). Pipe lengths are selected to match the mailable in three lengths form 5'6*(1.676 m)to 8'4*
antenna length and the required mounting height above (2.540 m). Pipe lengths are determined by the number
the roof' and size of antennas per mmint.
Tri-Sector Rooftop Frames are designed to support twelve
1'(305 mm)wide by 8' (2.438 m)tall panel antennas.
Design loading,per TL41ELA 222-F,is for 100 mph(161 1213.61H In)
km/hr)basic wind speed, 1/2" (13 mm)of radial ice and �I;oM>n°' 2-718"c?3maa 00
a roof elevation of 100'(30.48 m)above grade line. a'11.219 m) Antenna-~ting
antenna SORMTOn Pon Ordered
��� aepar�tly l0.22.00)
. wtsW-antenna s�Daatwn -�'F
'(1.829 m) fff Antenna-Maunpna
alk"Me eenlr- Apes oroe+ed
a'(1.219 ml antenna sewa4n. \ RD+raleh
antenna _ 1D.22. ) / i
saw►atntn -��� _ x. _ _
• la.5T2 m) ��� '
Mt
r _
13'13.962
andm colt
N
13'13.962 m) rtodum
anenor butt
center-to-anu• '�-.� Nataba Description
92102 Sham s2411 15'3 R00hop Frame
pooduct 0241Z 20'3 R60110p Frame
Number DcKfilption 62413 23'3-ts9 RoOf►0p Frame
92101 5'(J.524 m) 62414 30'3-Leg Rmfmp Frame
92102 10'(3.048 tN
92103 0'(4.572 m)
92104 20'(6.096 m)
92105 25-(7.620 m
92106 30(9.144 m)
• • 1 Rooftop Frames-22.07
2
ABBREVIATIONS
ADJ. ADJUSTABLE - -.0 AWC WC AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE '
BUR BASE MOBILE RADIO
CLG. CEILING
DIA. DIAMETER
E0. EQUAL
9.101 lAA7E5 AViB'"SOUTH
EXIST. EXISTING SIM
• C.C. GENERAL CONTRACTOR BlCWA1NGTON•
,AAN SS431
GRND GROUND -
Phans.6171037600
GYP- BD. GYPSUM BOARD
fu.6171037690
HARD'WD. HARDWOOD
MAX MAXIMUM
MFR. MANUFACTURER -
N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
OPP. OPPOSITE -
PT PAINT
PR. PAIR _
SHT. SHEET
Sim. SIMILAR
S.V. SHEET VINYL
S.S. STAINLESS STEEL OAT M.Ra Ia 2000
TNNO TINNED
T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE - - -
T.O.M. TOP OF MASONRY
. ... REVT9CNS
U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - - M DATE
V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD
V.T. VINYL TILE SITE NAME: '
WOW. WINDOW
2
HART LAKE 3
SYMBOLS
7
SITE NUMBER:
Mrs 0171 �
1® ROCU NUMBER
KEYED NOTE L A M P E R T
A R C H IT E C T S
• - 4—� ELEVATION =
��1G33/ 13H37 NE'Lincoln St.
Nam Laks, MN 55304
/NanA:4IxJ33.1 x11 iar.61 x.7l7.x6A9
SECTION '
y
ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION:
I HEREBY CERnFY THAT THIS PLAN.
SPEOFICATIO1 OR REPORT WAS My
4 DETAIL DETAIL LIRECT SLPBER%IVCMRAN00MAT I AM
]/a''N-0 A O THE TE 0 PROFE59 AL
SCAIL'
AR I T 0 ME-LAWS
MI N
OA-'-- REG NO
SITE NAME: SHY. OESCIOPTION HART LAKE
NO.
HART LAKE
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT SITE NUMBER: i-1 am 941T 9�NUMBS
LAMPERT ARCHITECTS P.A. MH 0171 .
13637 HE LINCOLN ST. SITE ADDRESS:
9 HAM LAKE.MN M304 �>I > a[A nAN.^°°'N,vs Aors w MN 0171
APAOC Hmul FADING
4001 STINSOI BOULEVARD w 6Ir.f0.1 .
PHONE: 763/755-1211 ST.ANTHONY.MN.SU21
FAX 763/757-2649 OWNER: '
CONTACT: LEN LAMPERT St ADDRESS
MECH -- ENGINEER APPLICANT: APACHE MEDICAL BLDG.
ow.J.SUTHERLAND k ASSOCIATES,we - HExTEL - 4001 STINSON BOULEVARD
6300 WEST OLD SHMOPEE ROAD 9401 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 160
MINNEAPOLIS.MN M436 BLOOMINCTOH,IRN 65431 ST. ANTHONY, MN SS421
LANE OFFICE. (612)703-5914 -
¢ o: FAX (61x)703-3900
4` Y PNOHE: 612/346-41aD. IN� - S4ET nn„E
FAX 612/346-4161
STE TEL 'n CONTACT: BILL FERCUSOH
�SItE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
PLAZA 60 STROH ENCINEERINC TITLE SHEET
39TA AVE WE SHOPPwO
CENTER 2nd N. JOE
MIN
i7 O
MINNEAPOLIS,LIS,MN 53401 -
; 9{T NUM8E2
• 37M AvfJNUE - -
= PHONE: 612/341-9372
N FAX 612/179-4763 ACCESSIBUTY REOWRE7ENIM'
® CONTACT: BERNIE STRON -
/n4NTT 6 VY.Mm AM•01 M NUU.N INMT.IIOa
NaaTH T 1
VICMrY MAP CONSTANT TEAM PROJECT SUMMA3tY SHEET PDEX
UL
29
9401 IAMES AVEMJE SOUTH
SLRTF 9160
• BLOOMINGTON.MN ss47+
. Phone:61270]7600
Fax:6127017690 "
_- - DAZE MARCH 14 7000
REu+90Rs
NO. OAE
I
7
0
AEG MIN ON ROOF NEw
TO F-1- WANTED ♦ METER
APPLETON P=0
STREET tPTEL vIReY LOC 27 18 t02
t PIKE EATING
ROOF. WUN I A, ,DWAOL VEl�Y ROUTE ROOF ----- PORT E
VERXA � lOC NE.wALawaT r ELEG —
PANf1
VENT.CABLE RUN I r
ELSTNG ECUIPNENT O
UNLXR P041HOJ9 STAR- —1� I° BARS L A M P E R T
(wivy LOCAntN) n+OUSE RODP I J 6°K I A R C H I T E C T S
--- (!)PROPOSED WOOL NEXnEL PAnEt II I ) Ia I..GLG/1CLC0 POICTRAllp1— )PROPOSED Al11rNNA5 OIOs'FROM CLOSET BO.ow, E2TEL PANEL
Ham 7Lek.. MN hSS104 NTENNAS O-Ur 1 I BAYS I Ph—:617.715.1211 F-612J67.26AI
♦ I)PROPOSED«�PAN& SED NE2TEL wALRwAY IOCADON) NTENNAS O 724• 130-MOUNT PUTT0PN R 11 I gOApp
tt*-a ON PEVn1OUSc ROOF, II I I In i ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION:
>e+C VEMY Lonna j1 I I L% I 91fOFBUnON nOR REPORTiWAS AN.
Y-0-• IQIO>•1ENf I--1-I _ I - PREpAREO BY WE OR UNDER YT
VWWNT LOCATION
FLOOR L� �n
FLOOR 11 I ( I'9 I DIRECT SUPER ON ANO THAT I AY
A D Y O PROFE59 AL
TAE r I O UYIS
I) L _J-a- JD -6•
U'o 1, ® DATE: �V O� i1EC.NO
HE i
" 0 16' � G 4 91E MANE -
m
4
OF PLAN 1 SHELTER PLAN
9VlL•v+a•- r-e• 2CA 4 1/4- t•-e- HART LAKE
" 91E NW6EH
MN 0171
9It ADORESS
w"?-RLM WlM
o CI O O O O o O O O - ABO`t CEA s16
�T TELCO RUN o a Cl D o 0 0 o APACHE MEDICAL BLDG.
102STNGE 4TH FLOOR °N ON ROOF.ARREPn00F "E" ,LLpw """ w 4001 STINSON BOULEVARD
m TOLIN FROM �pou"TeLI WAlN4 ST. ANTHONY, MN 55421
BASF7+FNT To ROOF.
VERFT RMTE - -
s�EEr nTtE
Taco PENETIU 110N SHELTER PLAN
LOBBY T�� �V. o+ O � BASEMENT PLAN
ExSTM MCO PANEL tam FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
%V WY LOCATION
ROOF PLAN
• �
SHEET NtA18Ed
NOTE,-A X
FLOORS AS NECESSARY X-RAY X FLOORS AS NECESSARY
IF STEEL RENFORONG EXISTS IF STEEL REINFDRONG DXOSTS ^ -
A FOR CORE ORWNC. is' FCR CORE ORUJW- a 116• L
3 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 2 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
3®
uNxsLSNr uoNr
c 51NC >./NAOIItiH aClEC10R vi STIIC cn SYNC CPS STNC STNC vs STNC %01)/LACES AVEME SOUTH
SUrTE 9180
' - BLOOMINGTON.AW SS431
PNna :6177037600 .
BROWN BROVIH fu :61270]7690
STEEL.CLAD STEEL CLAD BRO*4N _
TMATCI Ni MARVAR i9H15N.PAINT STEEL CLAD STEEL CLAD WAR-IR
BUILDING UNIT - TO MATCH FINISH.PAINT 'FURSi PAINT
UNIT
- BUILDING TO MATCH TO MATCH
BUILDING BUILDING
NE.1KTCt NM wrap Er wriER ..
MARVAR VNIT7
FLm�
FLOOR
O.Ag WARCN IQ 2000
NORTH ELEVATION 2 EAST ELEVATION 3 SOUTH ELEVATION 4 WEST ELEVATION DATE
"c°0"5
1 srulu.I/.--1'-0' Scx2:1/4*.11-' 9dIC 1/+ .t'o sti la 1/+•-1•-0- ra
NOTE I
THE TTPE NUMBER AND YOUNTINC
. POSITIONS AM LOrAnONS OF ANTENNAS Z
AM TRINSRSSICM UIRES ARE LLUSTRAIT4
CKY.ACTUAL TYPES NUMBERS AND UMNrAG 3
POSITIONS MAY VARY FROM WAr B SHO'Ar1
H
S
�
J A(LQ rFr(� - PROPOSED NCST0. S
)C9$4 •PROPOSED MCr1EL ANEL ANTENNAS
PARQ ANYDWAS PROPOSED !Ufa-MOUNT.SEE
f TM-MOUNT.'SEE "GAEL GWING COSTING wp
+/A2 FOR AZIMUTH
+/A2 FOR AMAITH COS1trNC ELEC CO.Wt EOLPPMCNT E>OSn:G
1001'ACE EOUIPMENT PAMTEO TO WARN LOUPANpr
EL-tO2.T_ 3/a•— — BuIPNG (BErONO)
[nSTOIC [ASnNG EnSnNC COSTWC EIOSTMG 6
STjp(MIL PCHTHQISS EOUPMCNT PENTHOUSE ❑ TO'�LL .
ROOF OEOt ( )
EL-
cauRTH FLoa+ _ L A M P E R T
EL — ARC H IT E C T S
• - - 13837 NE Lincoln St. —
THUHDIOOR Ham Ix..xMN i55SO-7S720A9
ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION:
Y EL-97Y-0' WAS
1 HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN.
MSTFLOOR 1--L--L--L--L-� ® - DIRECT ATION OR REPORT IUkk
AMWON PL" PREPARED BY Y OR UNDER MY
980'-0' DIRECT SUPER PRO 1HA 1 AY
A D T REDS PROFE
AR E
APPLETON
"-j YIN S
GATE'S ��� REG.NO
5 NORTH ELEVATION 6 =OLE,1nIL ,LION
ftillR tnP-t'-C EST—
HART HART LAKE
9�RWBFR
PROPOSED 147(iiD
PANEL ANTJ-"
t VII-MaI+(SEE
PANEL � NA2 FOR Az MUTN MN 0171
PROPOSED COSanG t TRH-MOUNT.SEE k M Caw
L D ROOF OyiCR IIROPO BUtDRG [OIRPMOHT +/A2 FOR AZIMUTH _ PRCVOSED cBUmYIH1 .
(KVQND) (B YON BUIDIIG E»nHG
0..102Y-77/6'— —
E7OSrWG COSTING (� ) 0Cro'o) WE ADDRESS
EOUTVMERi a� PENTRQ75E TOTER EEQAPPCNT EMSTNG
-$ ROOF oeac EpUPMf7Hr
EL APACHE MEDICAL BLDG.
4001 STINSON BOULEVARD
wuan±FLOCI — _ ST. ANTHONY, MN 55421
EL-99r-a'
s4Er nnE
1 a
ELEVATIONS
EL•97Y-O• 1(I--��I--1�I--1f 'f�''
• i1RSr FLOOR— "'^�"�'�"' ® ro,N sHLTr MwBER
�0.-980•-0•
It A3
SO H ELEVATION W l A ION
7 stills Ins.-r-r 8 suLr.tnr-r-o•
31
STAFF REPORT
4PTo: Planning Commission
From: Michael J. Momson, City Manager
Date: March 21, 2000
Subject: Concept Review: Sign Variance for Pratt &Whitney
A representative from LaPointe Sign, Ed Doucet, contacted Staff about the possibility of
installing a sign for Pratt &Whitney, a technology company located at 2930 Anthony Lane.
Pratt &Whitney are requesting a monument sign in front of their property but because there are
three buildings on the property, they are requesting a sign that is cubical in design. The
proposed sign is 5 x 5 on four sides, making the sign face approximately 100 square feet, and the
proposed cubical signage design is not proposed to be the same width as the pedestal.
Mr. Doucet has agreed to appear before the Planning Commission for a Concept Review.
FEB-23-00 11 :27 AM A LAPOINTE SIGN INC 612 920 5765
32
I '
s !t: s �I.�i1:ii!:3i!'!i.,i 1'
i
IF '' li Sir r' 't :
IIFtt•ii,.,,i.i '1�,,,
,�' ui '� t 'li•: 13' i'�i tt:�ti
!13 ;!• is
it
T1
V .. ..'. 31
..........
c
i m
it
1{j!jt
�� a ` '• ,•'''l.' N`''' ';!!:':!•'�: lit
;� �i��: �, � ti.i, �•;,�,, r•;J•.►, ; ;;iii,::+:li!,!ti;�;ll.i( .
1a r i.'•
FEB-23-00 11 :28 AM A LAPOINTE SIGN INC 612 920 5765 36
lCk � s
• 1
c�
/ . .y k��
14 �,'
2
f l r i411
rI5(
JI �•
5
r6
14:i I
�' 1
WL
VIII. OTHER BUSINESS.
35
LAW OFFICES
SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER, P.A.
. 1300 WASHINGTON SQUARE
JOSIAH E. BRILL.JR. 100 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MICHELLE R. KLEGON
JAMES R. GREUPNER MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55401 JAMES A.YAROSH
,
GERALD S. DUFFY STEVEN WEINTRAUT
WOOD R. FOSTER.JR. TELEPHONE (612)339-7131 TROY J. SEIBERT
THOMAS H. GOODMAN ROBERT F. RODt
JOHN S. WATSON FACSIMILE(612)339-6591 BRENNA E. NELSON
WM. CHRISTOPHER PENWELL
SUSAN M.VOIGT
ANTHONY J. GLEEKEL Writer's E-Mail Address: TonyGleekel @sbgdf.com
JOEL H. JENSEN "525 EAST WELLS STREET.SUITE 250
SHERRI L. ROHLF MILWAUKEE.WISCONSIN 53202-3815
JORDAN M. LEWIS* (4141225-9646
BRIAN E. WEISBERG FAX 4414)276-6255
March 10, 2000
Mr. Michael J. Morrison HAND DELIVERED
Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony,MN 55418-1699
Re: Hillcrest Development—Apache Plaza
Our File No. 21,256-AG-003
Dear Mike:
. Enclosed please find a proposed new section of the St. Anthony Zoning Ordinance ("Ordinance")
for the Apache Plaza property. Hillcrest Development ("Hillcrest") is proposing that the Apache
Plaza property be rezoned to C-2 Commercial and be governed by the proposed C-2 subsection
attached hereto.
In order for Hillcrest's redevelopment of the Apache Plaza property to be successful, Hillcrest
requires flexibility. The proposed C-2 district would give Hillcrest its needed flexibility.
The proposed C-2 district is a highbred of the City's C General Commercial District(Section 1635)
and its LI Light Industrial District (Section 1640). While the C-2 district broadly defines general
office uses and includes different language with respect to some of the business and industrial uses,
there are no new use categories included in the C-2 district. In addition to the new zoning
classification, discussions with respect to how other City regulations impact standards related to the
uses that Hillcrest believes will occupy the Property (e.g., transformers and internal infrastructure
for high tech users, signage and lot size),will need to occur.
Hillcrest requests that the proposed C-2 zoning ordinance be introduced to the Planning
Commission at its March 21, 2000 meeting. Representatives of. Hillcrest, including Scott
Tankenoff, will be at the meeting to discuss the status of the development process and to introduce
the proposed zoning ordinance. Introduction at the March 21, 2000, meeting is imperative to
enable the Planning Commission and City Council to review the ordinance so that the public
hearing process can be commenced and completed, and to meet the due diligence period in
Hillcrest's purchase agreement to the purchase the Apache Plaza property.
36
Mr. Michael J. Mornson
. March 10, 2000
Page 2
It is my understanding that following the introduction of the proposed zoning ordinance on March
21, the Planning Commission-will review the ordinance on April 18, 2000, and that the City's
Zoning Ordinance requires three readings of any amendment.
If the proposed ordinance is approved on April 18, 2000, it is my understanding that the readings
will occur before the Council on April 25, May 9, and May 23. Hillcrest also understands that the
first reading of the ordinance could occur on April 11, 2000, following the introduction of the
ordinance on March 21.
Please forward this correspondence and the enclosed proposed ordinance to the Planning
Commission. The proposed ordinance will also be presented to the Planning Commission at its
March 21 meeting.
If you have any questions or comments,please call me. I look forward to hearing from you or any
of the City's consultants.
Very truly yours,
W
Anthony J. Jell
AJG:Iar
Enclosure
cc: Scott Tankenoff
Bill Soth, Dorsey& Whitney
37
Section 16 - C2 Commercial
16 .01 Purer ose. The C2 District is intended to provide areas for retail sales and service,
high density office development with adequate space to meet the needs of modern high-tech
offices including off-street parking, off-street loading of trucks to allow for office and
commercial uses to be located in close proximity to one another and to permit the joint use of
parking facilities,provide for certain light industrial enterprises engaged in such activities as
assembly, storage, warehousing and light manufacturing not associated with high levels of noise,
odor, dust or other nuisance impacts upon adjoining properties, and in an area such to allow for
ingress and egress to major transportation facilities.
16 .02 Permitted Uses. The following are uses permitted within the C2 District:
(a) All permitted uses within the C District.
(b) Office uses that include, but are not limited to,the following:
i. Governmental.
ii. Professional.
iii. .Medical.
iv. Consulting.
V. Insurance.
vi. Employment.
vii. Computer and computer software related services.
viii. Other office uses delineated as permitted, conditional or accessory uses in
other subdivisions herein.
(c) Educational facilities, including business and trade schools.
(d) Engraving and printing.
(e) Non-residential studios.
(f) Warehousing, wholesaling and distribution.
(g) Research and development facilities, including laboratories (except for medical
research and testing facilities which use animals).
(h) Medical, dental or optical labs.
(i) Health clubs.
(j) Medical or dental clinics.
(k) Packaging of finished goods.
(1) Manufacturing of the following goods (generally not including the processing of
raw materials or the production of primary materials): artists supplies, building
materials, confectionery goods, canvas, canvas products, dry goods, electric
motors, generators, controls and components, electronics products and service,
food stuffs (except meatpacking or slaughtering), furniture, glass, clay and
ceramics products (not involving a blast furnace), machinery, machine tools,,
optical goods, photographic products and film processing (except film
manufacture), secondary plastics products including molding and injection
processes, rubber products except primary rubber manufacturing, signs, sporting
goods, electronic components and accessories, computers and accessories,
including circuit boards and software, furniture and fixtures and
telecommunication products.
(m) Parking facilities.
. (n) Computer research and program development.
16 .03 Permitted Conditional Uses. The following uses are permitted within C2 District
only by a conditional use permit issued by the Council:
(a) Uses described in subsections 1640.02(a) and (b).
(b) All Permitted Conditional Uses in the C and LI districts described in subsection
1635.03 and 1640.03, unless specifically defined as a permitted use in subsection
16 .02.
16 .04 Accesso , . Subject to the provisions of section 1650, the following uses are
permitted accessory uses in the C2 District:
(a) Accessory uses described in subsection 1635.04.
(b) Storage sheds which do not exceed nineteen feet in height, and which have been
approved by the Council as to size and design.
(c) Buildings temporarily located on the premises for purposes of construction for a
period not to exceed completion of construction.
2
39
16 .05. Dimensional Regulations.
Subd. 1. Height. No structure may exceed 59 feet in height or contain more than four
stories.
Subd. 2. Lot Area and Width. The minimum lot area is square feet, and
the minimum lot width is feet.
Subd. 3. Front Yard. The front yard must have a depth equal to the greater of 40 feet or
a distance equal to the average of the setbacks of structures on the two adjoining lots.
Subd. 4. Side Yards. Side yards o interior lots must be at least 15 feet each. Side yards
adjoining a street must be at least 40 feet.
Subd. 5. Rear Yards. The rear yard must be at least 15 feet in depth.
Subd. 6. Floor Area Ratio. The floor area ratio in the C-2 District may not exceed 1.5.
Subd. 7. Setbacks From Residential Districts. There must be a setback of at least 20 feet
from any property in a residential district,within which setback area parking, storage
and/or loading facilities are excluded.
49-tar-3/10/00-21256-003-Zoning Ordinance
3
'4®
Proposal to Change the Lot Coverage Ordinances
Background
ound
In the fall of 1999, the Planning Commission heard two very similar variance request in
consecutive months. They were.both requests for variances of the lot coverage
maximum. Both were undersized lots, both in area and width. Both had garages
located in the back yard with the driveway running from the street in front (ie, no alley).
Both were above the maximum 35% lot coverage limit. One wanted to add a deck and
the other had a large deck and wanted to enlarge the garage.
Members of the Planning Commission believe that there will be many more similar
requests over the next few years. Approximately 50% of the lots in St. Anthony are
undersized in area and width. XX% of those are already above the 35% lot coverage
limit.
Purpose
Rather than looking at the requests on a case by case basis, the Planning Commission
wants to set criteria that can be applied consistently, allowing improvement of the
homes in St. Anthony without adversely affecting the storm water control efforts. The
goal of the ordinance change is to reduce the number of variance requests to only
those that represent extraordinary circumstances.
Options
There are two components of the lot coverage limit. One is the maximum percentage
of coverage allowed - currently 35%. The other is the definition of impervious surface
or what is counted in calculating the lot coverage. Currently, any surface or structure
is counted.
41
. Option One
• Clarify "impervious surface" definition to more clearly state that it includes all
surfaces and structures (including decks).
.. Impervious Surface is any material that reduces or prevents the
infiltration of storm water into previously undeveloped land. Impervious
surface shall include all buildings and structures (including decks), as
well as driveways (paved or gravel), sidewalks, parking areas and patios.
A surface that has been compacted or covered with a layer of material so
that is is highly resistant..to infiltration-by.water.will be.considered
impervious.
• Increase.the lot coverage-maximum for-lots-that are below the current
requirements of 75 feet in width and 9000 square feet in area to 40%.
The advantage of this option is simplicity. (Impact of change on storm water runoff)
Option Two
• Change `impervious surface" definition to exclude-decks (and patios?) that
meet certain requirements.
Impervious Surface is any material that substantially reduces or prevents
the infiltration of storm water into previously undeveloped land.
Impervious surface shall include all buildings, driveways (paved or
gravel), sidewalks and parking areas. A surface that has been
compacted or covered with a layer of material so that is is highly
resistant to infiltration by water will be considered impervious.
It shall not include:
Decks that meet the following requirements: 1) the area below the deck .
is not impervious 2) spacing between decking?
Patios that meet the following requirements:
42
• Leave tot coverage maximum at 35%.
The advantage of this option is that it more closely follows the intent of the lot coverage
limit to reduce storm water runoff by excluding surfaces that do not affect runoff.
. .ti. ... v w r:k ,.. -• -,:Ic F.w. f.. >.. ,• , a. �, _.. a-..... .. .. a+ " ,- ..rz., au a
:I,.......na+-,,.•4_n ,4a.. r,. _d'..-. i, �.IJ✓ : , ,n. [... _ 'YnMt ,1.T?, 1 , _, fie. J;ka w. t r _r[•i-',., ..¢ ,?t' S •' J'virr,':
[,F -
.r+ •,:. ,a ., � n a -. _ r ..: ,. _...,,• .... 1'5. � .Ar� , rF..+.,iT k�-. ,i�," �.� :•..zp.. «.. :,,4�•,tu4,.L 4t �r. ..+n;..n ',iv"'cF„,rk
5 rPii::"
_ �' ..4.. ... ,,-d �i '._ . � .. :�.�.?k q' � .,y. P R•C'.'" �^9r�!' 4 .
.... !?� .t3 77��stt. �.. :Y w!Y3.�yr�::: ,,M�e«n+r. .I.. C y"'F�d �,re,, ,: �'^r d ..i 1 Krr -s�f..5• "1J'd�c Lr .nl�M,x [�' ,_7:;:q•rr
��.: � �'.'Y. ... .e r. v� ,...'J .,-., ff xr...1;+K ..,...,.+...rr�•- , +., .,t.,yk3r r b..-: ¢� ,y a.� aA -F. 'h?s. ,yt � rh,rr,.,
r..L.
�"? ... ,..: r......[. ..,�' ^W...,- ... _. q 3 _.._. _.. _ �•r_.r -!i„__ t.. k-L;Ar! YL'l a!ir:..�' .., k "'"fi cA'. aiyr, ..y:, �..
ai
a. k _ ] ..._. r. -, _ .I[a. .. {,c R .... 'AM u:v -.'.P' _ •li:- n\ 1
'c..s..a. ...A,. ,r r a ,. :..,P.... :I, , .r .,.SrN .t ,. ..r ,_. ... c_ .� .:..r.r.6 4.. tk+ ,' _,-Ir• �_. ,. , '.w,,,
.,.,.' k ..L, I�s. ,,..r 7�r �sl �:t.Fd e4'i^. :.-,. ,,..^K. .� �'X• t ,..... .:�. __-w ...a 4.' �r. ..':r., f.,i i,�c
.'L. „v...
..... .. _5r.5. ^"a 'p:-
.. -.:A.7dF n. ,rd ";Y.' ....d`, �.
r n'.rS h i-
w ...,.... c� 1. ry .• .c
r -r.. .r �.r.... r...sr. G.,.r
t�, i _ _. e. 11 n•,..r .,rl,.}`:?h.....eA ..x ,.. _.. ,_.�: ..u..._.. @... 5, .d.tf ». .,,..[._Il,,.. .�l r.�, i ci+ ? =i..Jr. -
r e.,.
I>rrw._J...'- .'�•.a. .,.. '`s:...a,,.., k M14" , m <._.S> ..a......., r:?lix.._,..c.,.r.k-�' ..'•s .. rr<:�.a,.. .. >rw:. ,;.4 1 •?3kt.-1'k.f:-Isa
'i w.... :;,..
.rr.."k._ .. .,. ...Y. w. ...�,. t... ,-.. ':r.. k
:,.- .. >-:..•.�, .. .r.-rt •Y F ,,.,xcF ..y .'�.r - ,.... 3 ,.. a"e�" � �"t.' .-2.
r.,.,vrn....- .. .?t i!. _.L ..en. ,.`... . .�_w. ,;`.,..,.r- s.-. _bcr?,.,. rs8-k". ?s. ...�a,Y, r.Jr h7:.._II:,.. :. - ,E...,.. . ..
V° ..x,r•.-� ..�a ,f, se .,�.. •M 1 ._r,. .w•;.,,,..» 1 5. N. .... .. x� ,`a Y. :n. � , a ,Y. CI r r?.-
7. �. >. ,� 1. 4a �4. [.Y. � � ��r. %, aF € 'h1,..xJ'r'x: �,�u +.• ., :>ti 4 .d k,5 »:G
� •J. �,. t .�' b . ., . . ._. s.�*mod . + :n -.�,3. . ...x.l ;v �__ a r,...... ,... X .� ;,. �F r rs•:. r,'.rrs,: f >�,,. �•, 2_
...t4 t r '.a, .c ! L?f,ro6 ~t-+„'k. a 's x_., b.. .. _n J."'h a_ ^ ..ra e .-. •,c -Yr 1: .-r±
ti' ..,.., '. ..v. .r >...9-,a -�•...,'•v..-..r:, t ,_,..4 _Fv ! .". _wF.. 's t•: �bs.
- ,>..I..>< ,Y,, 'f nr •sEM1r, , 3 h a:.j5 r�d a ,f. .+ LS -✓.. 7 S? i Y ):d.Ytat-( .ii
.� ,4!: /N .r4.
..�.. _' `.7 CY`_. 7••. 'YY �
.� ,r .,t ++,.; �':, ,....._ •t ,.. rr _.Y.a ;. rJ,r #, -
, a. -r.,_.,•r .. 1 .„h�'z r ,t: k_
nt...%«. :3 a. 1�. us." ,. 'gym '2:;` -0.3x. '+v T„vwr,•<:
.,fit< l", _- ..J• fv .,r,:�4• '3 r.5.-
„x ��...:K ,a t...s 4.
ter,,:', <.,A_ 1. ,r V, rr` .ci;�. f,.r. vh• >.' :,_rd•,s.�,r.s ,c ,..`v r,r 3,a.1..,.`Folk y.. �..?`3 5;;. 'I., /t
�•! ,_at`� t :. _ :•• ., 5 : �.,,{.r :-5, `+jkt..� 4j�n. a.r,s+,y`. ;:...,;Sys.....s. .:1,:& . .. -.,+'� r �rf.p(''4 - �;•. : Y. ,,,r. :r� .i,�:#:
.,.:y:..' ,.,y.r
.µ,{.5,., .. :.. v ,: -. .. , - ra�, � .•k �.. ,h -e r.,, 1 R .�, ,,?I. •v.11(
If., .a .. .. ,. ., r t .a z. Fr-'a_ fin•[., �:'E,... .. �e�,•?: ::i4a z..•+4,i,, _ �.. !. 1 �"'t*1... � r, 4 r: _t•,:M,.I
.�,. F. Y:,, .• 4y:, ?..,) as i>, yr� t.;. x:i.�Vra s'. �tc "..� a!,;-+. .tif_
� h n•"!.,.. � ..f'a ':+Y S'W w:�c'St•' !,�v+, '
.: k31r. , .., ., ,_ .:, ;:. s ,• - 5.. ,:.., t ,._., ,.. i �r. „ :.n.wi-e 4r w'>R._ .� -.3 R �:-.-,d r'l�i+ d..• 4t 9''..,
:....
"'_3'.. fr.„. pia .. -,rr. „,.>`.k�' 1- a'i, . . i' L 1 ... s F _r, �. W, P ,•z?':'• ,,1:.,1..al:, „4+ -�
,.>tki•sa. -�'x-x.,.•t-r�,:�!,vw,.:!s':�"..•.;,,, ,„k..r :+,:>: ;>.~...r, ._..., �;�[ � ,s...r_ t �Jam-P= w<>a ;��r s f:,:,;:Y.+�'..,. ;:r'
I :+�.r•. ,a,�.. f5, ::. ti i. .: ,. R .i:J,. y:..-k ,, ,.., uC,�'.
C.. r.. w.n.n7,Ly't ,• v r".},Y.. _d.. --t� ,a�. d5.•.$'. s�.a....rk<. rr` ;{,. y ..::{� -Y� :r' 4.,: - .' v''.+rih,.-yy .
h. t.a,.z J' P-, 'r. R ,•tn :.571.. ,L.i a .4jr{,;rvk .:�y. .;!. a,+,d: ,r :..?.w7 .J- .7. _�r <.-�..A. .-. ::.ir
.... ... �._ :..,,,2. ., .-,
s :rr ,. a,., - :r .,.kl,
. ..J:. . „. ...;.'.< ,_r, tl:.i. L .a„bk-:'4!`�:, tr '!:rr -'} ,�. '�'...:r.• .`} _?SJI ..fi- Ira:v..r. �,x:y'^q:. :.i.,±: ,.....
v"ir+,
X,. -: ._ r.+ tk,k.'�.'-_l+r,' N. ,r..�:,. ,. Y. --�',3- r., *, ._e 7:. .c..:r•,. .�•. 't..ti'. rs-'••ra. x.k K'. ..4'. ,.a. s, h.�::
�..�
... -. r� ..6 ,.. ... �.. Wit., ,: .: _. .... .,.
d,:! ,'v�. 5.. :. .1.,n eW" :,lu. k , -,a' h'J. ,...4,.v:�. .n � :.w.. m.a,.s"4... 4.-« . .�+ u. ..�+. I tS, r. .wwl '# ,.4: .L, F.. i:r-!:.
t,:: •x1L. „<t
g _J. }}. r a ....i':i. ..R.... ...+i .'ik S „ .a....n?r_....... 7.. _..n r,, w„ Zirvs..44.,/ it-. ,nk, ,;.✓ ,lt. s .ai?rdah a. ,,
1: ..Y -3 tr J .rys.:7,.
, ...IA:IE,. ., 4, 1'Y r...xi._. : .: ,..,,..w..r. _nnk. ., .,r. Via.....: .x ,, :;::.,._.',r. :. .,_. -.N:,r:....,u -.riT•r .: .F. Y�>''' -..�. ..#eow
_.�}ah .r +�y 2. •ir. C:
J N r,4'. T. r. ,..
,r J.4...r,•.rL++r4rttr... 'S: ..F:Ir �,,N701`1'-;, � ,: ,. .»,. .. .,.• r.� d,_ ..... �ka?,t W� _. .{ r'•.ar•F„-•7�1 ... ._�:-tl..,� _d:t>< "c- �c..
.a'. �', i:! m.:. >.�,.ar.,.[ +.'.K. :J
.4w ,.,.d. •, ,. 5.. ::'tr::._�.�t.� t, ,. �. r _.. .::.
.!._.... ... :c . ., .., f., ...._ ... xl!�'x.., ). .i•2._. ,..r< '., .x sr:. a: -i�+•, , .r...P-.;... .�r k.. ��:R„d :1 J v ;,�7�5,
.�,. ,�, -,. •.. .. ,r.. .r. , r � ...., .�t ,..... ..a ,. gg�4'-4. f-Mx...•,.. a-. ... �:.�... '.:.. I -:�;, �".-.,'r 'k :mar 'r ,'r
.�V:J.;y ,F-
-}r 4. ..k« - -
3..rG r: ,r: }<.. ,.A+: -•yy H .. §},fiwx .. «xf. 4t }....l xi: > rt! , G e r. C
��.r:. .'.,,,:�L:aS•:u,,.2?: .. �•�; ..,. 1 1 .. -.-,..,5... ,d55- r, f, .. ..:
1k�' !Da•.�rt"' x 7. f� - FM: ■',: :r •:. e. 5+r.. ahx.itr.... .3y ■. r�:,u ..t'Gy..-!'C v., rr.,�'",,"^•r:.
4 »,a,. ... 8....,,,r.. a.:� _.. .� .:r'rr'.-f,, Y•,,m. � sa a..:ht 1.4,,k. ,�s'r'.>'..I,.:;'w,_ �Y:,.,.-;�r?a �1. ---.P ' ,.•:.L .F,r. 't. . . f.4�,.x'<,
r '4.' F.9•- it ( y J-, "•v, ,,h,, H
, .:a ?u
a '-�•.-.,,d.�r s:s¢� 'r!vk: 'k �fa !..y^. -rr,f .:,�.
'' tt tal' ,�-,r,;";��•`.1:^x.�n.
',. ,e "��t e'�'�- p1f i'+ t Y.,' 1) ��! ��r. :.; q � b} ,v tt. n 1..'s;.
_ .,^. � 41-�. D � 9. yr,a:.,:p� �� 5i� rn :r t n � w:b.0 I,, i-r.1,, i , 1,�{
p
J Lek'. �! ._ .7,.. r. `7.. tp' i..
eY r.. re,w n,�..:. r ., ... r•c. ,.r... ,'1... ,,. ...:.".rG ., ,r :c I I. t:,! •L. .ate
s
k-a r ,.,. �-•t-, ....r n ,.,r.. In.. -; �� •:. •!. ;,.. d.... .;•�'r.- � +�. :v:
,�..n,. x.tr., �r �1. ,r� x
,. ve•ITw`., .. a. / .f .r..✓•,...-<_. 'rr.f:.. ..v.zr a. ., � � :_ ,..A... ..,I?' r. .,>.-. n �, .-._. ..:: v,.. ..gala' , ..?
,M,�,. .�.r-r•S,. Yl
•arv:z� ,. �. _. ..r`�_•,x. .� c. � l•n_
. ... :ra; ,..�c. *. ..'u5'.X: ,�-x....a.. .•1:e: v,..G 1 -i_r. �;v. rY..r :.,.u. •,'�.:..
.,> .. .1.x,..."a ..r...,,+lk::'�++'.. tl r. '•7'.. v: ...{.,- r_ , ... 4 .b. .q.. .a_ .a[.., 6 .:>!!.
J. d < .„F zt wiJ
F4• :.k.. ..r.._ t''...r.. :' I' F•+ xai. »I,
x n ,_,,,>•u.. ,, ,u,� ,'�!k�s. tY
}} ._ �' .,is, ,_. ..:., ,.•a ra?: r _ t,: <., 5{�n�a r ..t.a.s _�_. ,,.,, .::_ ,. .j.,. ,..:,:�;. .Sar_,. 1 . �
s c5 a,.r. { n.,,w al .�..., k �,,,. :
..�' i[a- s Y. -.vT'•r rL: 4,_
,- ,,a. ! a-.s r,1 I. •.., ti. ,1..,n'h:Rx,..,•• fi+J.. �.. , ,Y �+ ... I.,... n n. ,�. r-..♦ -. tii �� ..-:. �.} 0 r'-...
P. ..... N.k. ., � -19}' _:w � ) 4 ♦at.,..ykl -� ;ni,
w .1r a .,.: .,r .r;+ ,ir, r a ^�,f' tr'a•. :>
7!s:. ,.,,r7, ,..,r .,3:k .....*}'. , ...1<. _..,� ,..1. .,`hr.r_. ... +C _ ..�.rl. it h..,.`5�.,., ,.. ,.€ .rn•�,:- ., ,,[, �r•�-
YF .... .. 7.�i W l.. V.... ., ,Y LT'i k 'Y:'.�,:h.. J r>.•...a, F. -1:,:.n, ,,.1 �.IGF.. r.x ,.�. .... r<........ r . ... '(.- ..`i�<.,n r:,. ..i �'k.,..X
k!, :,.. , ._.. '3:'�., 31 F'S' t<°•. .'S .:.,:.x
J s- 'fi'< ._ SyF ... ... i ,,,. r...�.. =r _.1 K t'r_. ., ..K: .._St,.k s,..,.r.. ., .•a<_..x. x.<....
- ',v �. � ,v.'. ,r, } h f.a� �. d, eiaY)r S. Z•.
"Y,..... ♦ '.e, ..3 c :LwQ', s. tr' .,c ,ry'.y. l.,
rr.. }-,.. i ,..••; -rT '5. YS. ,.3..'{ e4-k.y,.,-.. •7`..
Z S,1 r ». ..,..k _rr .v!.r... a i;r a,ro...y:, .,.-. ., .a: a. :•y: :, •.. n.r..4., .. .. F f .4 3.Emq✓' 'ArlSr L ..1.,•T t r#.•Ik' G:
.:.aA & .a +.r,..a
. ....r ,al .¢,/I »;.-�. Y. ,hk'•. r',.�4; r v�,, t, .F ?! t,_
,..a. n,•ax „,. ,, 1...,,::^ts. ,r„ .k:..t,.,:..r,;,,- r,.. r•: r.. .•..,
r. .ai-,.,a: :t'�`✓'"... :rt .:....,'.C.. „ r h J ,. .. „ »a_..a... t_. r: •.... awe I'ri yr n' i'l+o-tr
.....,. .r- .r, r ,.. .. .... - ,In .., .� .. Y ..5. o.,1. .: ., ..,. .q. ..?- ,.[. .�iy.•1_. FJ,.. o -
•1. .r:ht4v?'.� al.. �,_ -,e, (-�. 4 L.t <.. ,. C RY J. ,,. -r. ,,Yn 'wI �. :5!„+ ..tJ+nKHn•n..
.._.x.1 ,LI!_.. il:-�
+ t , ,r+fh _ntt, v ,. .< x•- r•,rd�Yr r,."Sh i7 _...„ �"l.Tw.7. iGS,.,. r 5 [,,,r>.. ,._ :D. _� „1 nixtJ 7h. dr71.t
s„�. ... s,.. ..rrf-I: !V„ iTS.. ,k„... k..mob,..........._ .r't:. Txa1'..a _.,d .,fN_....;.,.g ,,.:._ . I'., .. ., ,. ..,rr d.. •.e ,.<. �7 h-.
d ,L:�.., l.. 1�._ .,y.. ..:;,,,,_
.e,. �,. ,,. ,.,� �y, ... . .Y. ,r'J;e. a<�• :_t,:.r. ..f}I 4., ,.,.R i. {Y'"nl F+.l 5.. .Y,"
. .I ,•P,., ,f r: L .r. r 3 r=..al .. t. .rh�: ,x_,, .r .h,. ....... : . r..Yi7.n J� .,,... ,I, rA ..,dr,riF /4 .F• .l,. 1�, :,,>x y 1, _a;i
7 .'S,. _`s,.
Y .:�<`, -. .,r _ ,, ':r :T :1 RI.. .i ..� ,. hm 1,./....1 Y.... !:. .. kn: .:. .. �• ..1 r,s '
... e,ill r h H '�, ...,� -.... .,!,. .. .tart: .. ,C ..,....}.r. 5 ,., I.t.r. .. :.1. ,•,rr ,. -p,,-.c,r,',W. .,.:r.r, tv..l .?•,e .r. r,n� -!
'rd' ,'.e:.'tit'.
, .i ., d hx � .�f r: , +:. .J. .... 4 a .f .. :, ,,�.' ::.. k..r. }l »'✓• .: •i. v.. I. .nd.r a-: ....._.. .. C.n � ':W
,;vv, ";J-'. 'y..:
a T.. �. v .. ,.. .. k v L. .,.... .:.1.:1 Nr..l :,,.Y ,.,r x ,r a irrn, n.....1, .. E. .:a ., ,i k ,r1.5Ji.r }� 1 r,r'i IS„..'P!.
a❑ �,':..1
�: ..:... ... ,. II"�n.-.. I. �. .a..r.�-.r.C. ,..�h,. :r lC... 5.. ,...r ,. ,}, e_..,'u�.,,. .... ., {:-. 6 d....+;.k.o-.�.u.'hr ,..I
iii:,L- .. _.r•k.'i,t -.,.: ., a„».. 5_ ,.,,•. Ir.
+: rrJ n..: 63 '1}^ x ,.!J ,..J.... I''.,„n .h. t r.a,;iG ..a.'. .' na. ,,.k.. •N.,.:,k, � ., I.,. .,+ ,..-1 ,.. ,.o r. L.. ..,.1.,,!t .: .. 4 ,c..,..,
J'I ,.. ..Ak .. 1. n- a -
.
., L .a. .ryt .T. L.. ,:r4 .. r_-,.. I ....._,.kY, ...,. .._ la t:
E r K .v,n1: �.L. c , ,.r u.l a. .. T.. ..r.,.
(r,, ...1 I ... JI ^i . .�:. I. ...�. L � _ .r. .. -,..,s^..r... r 1 ,.:_.c,..� ..� F.. r .: � ..- ..�A""- ,.d.�a :d_..r i•:? Y".,�,,..
a ::.!,d'L r v`r 4 �•
...t,_ �,t!, , �. :-ra:.a , .rl., 4 .... , N:r.' ,i•,:. .,r,. ,,�- ...} �r ..
I .ry ,pt r.,,Rl- .rFtt� .,. •r. ..5. rr� ..+- QF 9 .. ,b, J .5,,:,,qrn
,.: _,..,IS•,r.:Fa, V h.s 1. P-IF r•,�?..1, �"!n.JIY r!.„g..Y.:..-'}„•.. n..». 3: -�.,.,_"1`... ... ..: -..t.. ,_J dl. ,, - 5 t v _,. 9 w5. t�4;,; -r4,.
•IL 1 r,1r1'. .r, ^.1: v .��
.,•,, I,.,d,r.+..':G« Jr..N .. ,.., a. �.: .n�s.,.'R r n 1. .+'k':.,I�l ,.] 1t`. Y.. .'rr:.a :�:ta..ti r rY J. ..P .:5 r w, a :.1, d.;5,h1- '[ tr;.:lp.•
d �. °r slr � {�:,...,.I•r ,s`-
f C"M and d a.
•'�.1,- rt�,.
m. r.h r' i ar .:,.. ,.3.d .,,R r' A .....,}..v I k y N.r 4, e.. � Mr .,.. .,4 i ... 9. b..:. : '•.'ratFrr �: t..4.{, �n �.�:l,l'fg
.1" '.F::ya 5. ,h,.
R;' , .. ';rn ,,.. ,.ry �I,.. .�)... ..:3..e I_. .•._, .... _3.. .,: _!... ., [. , ,...dire, J '?Srta„c ! "-- A ,..r T -a:'.M.. .:
:! -•t, +�?!
,.., _�.. _.5�, sY 4»'..:. Y'� :._.)� na e,_..:�a.«_ .., ..,a .."S. �.,,a.-, •. d. a:, ., -e,nx• :.... .r ... 'S e >d t: k ^u:v ..,J.
N,.. C_ ,. A,x..d, f.,.: P ..,.a °dk3.: n,. 4 t.J }� t 'J. r .y 4 t .7 •,p l:, N,.
-., :d.. ,., "M
-. v„ .rE.. ,. ::Ix.... . ,.... k,.. ,q,..SL.., wr4.t, . .. t.,J,,»•. -Lr S"'
rv.w r, M? J r ...,. :•d,_4.a7,r
n. __ J. ..,+.-,-r 3 .1 ,1 a•, .,, nd,r.,. 1 tr �J"'e.l
p I T..... a?tt,f,�x.n: 77••x..._,.[...:� a..r:l.' :,. rn - �, d. 7rsr• ..F3 m ! r •C,_k_..
ar..4 ..C. -_..an3F'' ,!Cft^ ......_... .. :........., ,..' J.. ,.:- .. .a ., u :. ,, ,-r ...�w'�.vL••, G' \: 'w.wr 's .%a„r n :a $.. ,'a.. ,. 1
rk rL:., FI-!•,
,In ,. '•r; ., .. ,kx,,
.7� ...,. .�.,M.,..1�.a 5 ;C 't. •Y'tP' _.�Ju
...,,..�,7yL*a ,4,a. ..:a.. ..1:.. an.a:„ r,,..kGe!- ,,.. •n. ..r;•r r tPr..:r. •a .,:. . ,:Cr, .ra !. rnro_'d. ...C'I r. _!rA,r.- 7 ,.1:: .:c:=
d ._.. ..s . ,. .5 ?s. i rl 4. --� iFCF., ,:• }v �, I..v:,
r r., .,..1
.r ,. .,...-- ..,. ,.... .u..r,.,,,, �,t. -
I �.. � S ... .n •v.r-..r ur,.. _.- �.$".:I S ,N!,.h .,.,• -_ :..K...�. q' ,•.■ ■ ,.,_.. .
x. :: 1.,..N. ....V..,. .:.5..,..r ._ .7� ,..., ,? , K, •.......,r „p.. ..1.✓ ,'1`u iY�1 a ?■
;::, ;.Fr p-. .'- !`' •� r��' .q.� ,-'�. �.� .. ;. t l FYVr J'� �.e ,y. .� ., ,. -.': ,r ,.�-.:.,�. i,r x•{ur.'^. p 'S R .l-`4
15..7 tJa�, ym IJI, »
',g.. ':v:k. d a. ,,p., �, �., ,�, r � ,,. -t.. .^ Y,;e'�L�.r, [a 7�...r 4fi k"'' Y�,I�tui,r.s'''i 5 �1`.•>Ni+r!'w'�..
,. :Y' r I }, t ', jU ,�..r 14 •.,I 1.Y:•T�,. r .r G {r t
t k s,lila 411 �towns ,have ILaa.definiti k� :,L
I r: }. �. _r ko lI - 'bg � m erVn�ous•ne'ss
41,. ..�. .-. .l
K
�Ir?'b
r .,::., �.1 ro.,, „' ? J t :d•
•n.-. 1�a-�'✓ d S:.a. .d u...y. ...b..y
-x
-!. i
,,....A1 ! r. .-..7... n. '•.. A�..: _i.. I'1 ..ry,.1. ..r J.._ 1dr.. .x�:f:1 S4.A.r , ..... " ..: .,..... .:. ! �';• .., ,:• � t<
•'; ..,, ..
s-. I..,� ,'C} ..r.4. 6.uv.:l._ti,. .I. . ..... s r ,C u. __ :,: •:.. Mfi-.::�a49, ,._ _ r ..,.-.- -F,.a .�, r. 1fi.�T ... rl ._�..:..r
,-+: ;,a� r .1`i
t ,.. r ,."1 ...r %,.,., _.. .J..I,.,,1. i_. r,. :,. r t".. v.:.• .6:_„ ..a, S d ,.I :•r.`�. _--... .. .r ... ,: v',- ,,.•,it '.,.:..n .1.
t n,...:. I °t) ar:. 4t,
>,rai,•.'s. ,..,,, r ,.,,.L, „^9.J-, F,.,.,51� ••S .,�F,.. e r'. c ,,:,Y -ra, r- �..' i, .:.iY k. •*,.
.: t .,,..4•-_�I r. v .r rL,].I ,4. „.. �.. .r a .r.. k, .n,.it L i.,.�xhs'tl.t..... y '"I,.:I:, w,: 4 :'I.r,,,y., :T' L. J .'. 'r,
wla I. 1:_,:> .r,.. J..,.h l.,.» - f�4 ,�'y .xi...,�,:�' I.�.r ,rl• ,J :u! 3P �.
,,.• J
.�-r ,.?. I. F., :•� ..:i :.- ,..,i�. rr.,<.':M. r 1,�. L1- .':,Id�.r'v"1 a... ",'. ,?; .;.' ,. '- ..'S�� r. ya'�,' u�'r.:•, .7. I :.y,". J., _
...,:. .J..r. , ..,....,_ .,l yr .._. •ryr•..u ,r.. - ..,...a _r4_:• ..J �-:�1 , .:<:.�M '{'-:r.,'a„1T.- .It,a.!i`=r:'.A�� .!.}..J ,V . '�' "F,•.�,,1 _'J,.
1..:.
Orange,
iltJrtzv rk�9 hi{�dLalal
R
� � � material / / / reduces• • impervious
L, r YI yrr": LLrP
L prevent � previously� �
rct ,I '"; �L'r• n� �•
I 's-0 r�i•� 1;
land. impervious surface shall include graveled / / and
u II M r
J aS.Ir:, r,J 1r57`I , / / areas. A surface / has -been • , / e/ or covered ,/ x s rr
a' i
d I 4r �• b �
yrl 1 lr`+• 5n hdrl layer material resistant water. P� tip, rya.
includes surfaces as compacted sand, clay, as
conventionally •-G'�.rl r
as most / , roofs, sidewalks, , / lots
11 ha t`S�rL i rC'
k41 t plat',r I i
'. .;1;R nd other similar structures.
RED
�_
r'r4,
.' '.V
Gt.e_ir•,.i......;..7.,...n v.:.e}. 1if r'r.,s'1'F k xk.P�t 1d N.1,..!,.:.+.•;.T.:.:,:.r�•..�k.rI r:..c-,..'.h«1.-,.i,...>.n_,d..,.!.'.n...:'�i-.i;.,,-d,.,4�s rA.:,a:....:,..-:J..:r.f.J:.r::r.W
F,.v 4_Y,:...r-.1 e c Ia:�;..:,t7"...ir..,'.,a�v.Y.::-.,r.1*'..�t,:G F,k,l.r,n~h.....,n�...:�..,i..b a.d.'..fr�I l'l r.a,':.�.:d Y':a J,}J FU,.".»°',«a:?,k:,:..).,'.••l,.r r,r_...:......e..,.t:,...t:
......„i�e..L,.r.1 1,;:a-I,S.,.,-7Sd'1 N,-.4-:'w..•..:,•.._...„,...'4,_m.J..a,I.._n....a.,.r..!#.r a u,:�r+�h 4;.�:...k:w,.,.:,...r:,.r x..�..crr.T r,l:an.::.....::.�N...,..,.r:.�..:,:'.!r..c,°w:.:.9
elt.Yrrl.r.,..H,:L.e_,J rx.d..t r.Xr.`i.�.n".:.l-.,_.tA,k.,...r".,.::tr_rd.-i.+a.1_+a..7x,,�..r._eJ,1.�,..._.:A..y:.,,.,Y d.,.:.::;°<,.k..r...:r.,..t.•_,i''.,....,'-v n a4w:..r w_..-Y..a-:>..�,...e'.
:i4.7.a..;dt.Jt.'n.r.4 y,.,,......�.°.C,.ti,-.:.`.d,:�N.�.::L..x-_5.I,-.,::r.:..Y.'L�.!,'.rS a l��tr.:...�.i..t.,.r..,:,.!�+•k,r,.'...:..�_q:.ry j.ir!I.s''i�.y,i t F,i r�..,.,_,».�:..r
a,�'^',..�.,..-i,_'....Stt r,!"1-..9 r,..Y.e h,h v.r<.r,i«..Fy%Y�:'!G:,'.�d s;,a...�h.r:,,�,,,,...1.-.�i•p_,_,..-..,h>q�u.'m.t 1 k,+J-at,y.,i.t.-.:r:':2 a P P.,.'sk.�r�,',N,4.-�..ru,.-r.,!;F:.::-�.".
.�.l7-i�.4!.k..h Ml,
:411
:*
,:L..j.a ..�.�l-:ea�F-.-,,l:1..�v-'.r�r._r.�.:F a^V k 4J,..�s r:.r:-.,n15�.1c:,..v l r a ra..a i r',�sdf..rwL','f,'Y�:.kN''.,'ti.?.x n�,,_-�r:w.s-.J•n L>,.'c
.:.7a'�,•4"*s.!'1.
a.s r.'*s'i,-,-•:
�•1.•'Jc.,,j.',Y
-
.v:-.,.•,:g[`
N t
yL�a t,�t rih
4,-. .,... >. .;r- Iw :k� .�,.ki.,. ..,.rn .w,•. ,fir._ -I r7 ,,....-itf 1 •n ..;.t_!.° �' -:c .r,+-.,,r._I .::zj�'1.:.5'� :.�,. `d..:�'�'.S'!r.
.:,,I.?f''u,.:.d d.dtl...,'Y,r's.�' , I"�.,v, ,. ...... .. s .,:.. ,_. ... r,� .. ,k.:. .,,ryJ.k S.�'. �-"•.r1." ..a �k...r.5 da.mvr. ... c,•.c t .:a..ek,,
..r:.v,. 'k "•. .'Y _L ..wt -'45.- �„}+ul�
..,r � la .d ..t I. ..: a L; ,. r, r%.,+ .L-.r .,ka .._ „x....., .,d"'"'i.: ...Y1a....¢ r.,��. .. .,b� _Yn i ..Y '6, :;4,1
J• rrv.,iilY,,a -.r.F. i•ti.a
i. _.f.,'�' s..+,,.u{.� rl I -,ns.A•Y u-'P•t.rl I�' .r. , ".,� .. ,r-rt- ,..w. .,� n..,a1 y,,..r.r.r Y'.'•,, ,k ,4::..xh ,'J:' �., d- c'^f5•
1,..4.'; .+ L.r, :._ !r•1.r«.,..•. '•r+ ,.,'x. ,.•1.... r 4"4,..y, .L. z. r 3 i::k n a C r ,, r i.::'9 - 5, N !'.'': F,-. ,3
.._..
1._,.,_ _ .-::'.r_• r .., ,: : , t-; :'I, -..: r' TV'..:.q 411v .. :',S:_,,rJ nlr„�l' . ;.'I .1:I.il.m ..5�..I..,.L ) A. ,.N,VJ ..• .., 77
J I. �Y
:.I,
,i .l ,a.'J ar�{c:'19 .,,, ,. a.hr 's Jt,.. ;, is Jyl,L r,u`a.y['J �'hiv' aq.:!:�:LNp Fl.`il`r.Cl:,:-.,rn:-•x'. 8.r r -t:«,.- r :_ .... .rrN. _ rl. A,
r,..�.
•c'n.,':a
,. ,' .:, q, :._ ..:k., .G,.,., _� �, r, ,, :s.. r. - .:pd � ., : � t, �r 5•, {a L. G,n,( ( t ,;: 1 ;,;,; Ih;°:. 1'J..,,:V. f.,z_
`�ayr-.�„t.;..[.s:. �`[
S- -R'... t'.-1., I., � f'-1'. V„ti.. - 4. :,:.,,,t r. ''";.r. 4... .,... M :-I..,11:•.,.Yr _.r::.N�:_:. �'Y a-� k.).'Il 1r.i 4f �,._.J .� SU h J� -...
?.F,.rl
1 ::L6 In 5,,, pJ ,. ':..,., tS+ S! �. r;r:vn r•,-..:y.::.h. L I.. :j,.:i.: Y..} � 7 .:.�err, 1 y..-AF„
,, .:,,J .;lv. ...x'-r;_,-..r• _ _ ;,r,.-: y,fr, _S\„k.r_,. .,..rr,: 4r._1 4;.x %t. '!yi&.aG"ti �l?:'; '� t:. ,"�,�, a ,r� :r"'� �;
r ;y ray rn
,, z
Year 2000. Annual Planning Commission Report
City of St. Anthony Village
As defined in Section 305 of City of St. Anthony Ordinances:
Structure:
-Composed of seven members appointed by the City Council with staggered terms
-Is advisory to City Council
-Holds one meeting per month, if necessary
-Serve without compensation
Powers and Duties:.
-Review and make recommendations to the Council as to a comprehensive municipal
plan
-Consider and make recommendations to the Council as to all proposed subdivisions
and plats -
-Consider and make recommendations to the Council as to all proposed amendments
regarding zoning
-Consider and make recommendations on conditional use permit applications
-Review all applications for variance to zoning, hold hearings and make
recommendations to the Council
-Review requests for sign variances
-If matter is referred from Council, Commission must make recommendation to Council
within 60 days
Calendar Year 1999 Actions
During calendar year 1999, the Planning Commission performed the following official
. actions:
-Held 11 public hearings
-9 variance requests
-1 replatting request
-1 redevelopment plan
-2 conditional use permits
-Held 5 concept reviews
-Held 1 joint meeting with City Council
Upcoming Activities for Calendar Year 2000
1. Apache Plaza- Hillcrest Development is rapidly developing plans for the demalling of
Apache Plaza. We recommend that the Council authorize the City Manager to retain
the planning firm of Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban (DSU) as soon as possible to work with
Hillcrest Development on behalf of the City during this major redevelopment project.
2. Joint Meeting with City Council- We look forward to the joint meeting with the City
Council on April 18. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 5:30 pm., and run until 7:00,
at which time the regular Planning Commission meeting will begin. This meeting will
serve as a forum to discuss planning-related issues of concern to both the Commission
and the Council.
3. Bus Tour-We have scheduled a bus tour of the City for Planning Commission
. members on the morning of April 15. The purpose of the tour is to acquaint the
Planning Commission members with physical conditions in the city, including housing
stock, commercial and industrial districts, for comparison with proposed actions in the
Comprehensive Plan as well as likely redevelopment efforts.
Other Issues
Other future planning issues that Planning Commission can foresee or is willing to taKe
an active role in include:
. -Salvation Army property redevelopment (master planning, look for funding
opportunities)
-Continued redevelopment of St. Anthony Shopping Center (fire station,
Stonehouse, Kenzie Terrace properties)
-Identifying and submitting grant applications (first ring suburb grants)
-Development and facilitation of residential property grant/loan programs
Development of point of sale ordinance to maintain housing stock
-Development of code for'natural habitat on private property
We look forward to discussing these and other issues with the Council at our joint
meeting on April 18.
. 1999 GOALS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION.
1. Planning for Salvation Army, should it be sold.
2. Redevelopment of Apache Plaza.
3. Redevelopment of St. Anthony Shopping Center.
. 4. Aggressive.planning for large commercial/industrial sites..
5. Current amenities - utilities, streets
6. Look at and recognize existence of small businesses and home businesses.
7. Promoting a City identity.
8. Taylor development efforts to the future; not accommodate past.
9. Create a unique identity for Apache Plaza.
10. Continued enforcement of housing codes.
11. Resolution of water issues.
12. Parks redevelopment.
13. Cosmetic improvement on 37' Avenue.
14. Creation of guidelines for natural habitat on personal property.
15. Tougher regulations of RV's and trailers parked on personal property.
16. Revisit issue of split liquor.
17. Improving housing stock; involve local banks with investing in the community.
18. Formulating a Planning Commission budget as part of the City budget: hiring
consultants and economic development specialist.
19. Increased use of City's Web site.