HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 04202003 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
102906
BOX: 27
Folder: PL PACKETS 2000-2004
Document: PL PACKET 04202003
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
APRIL 20, 2003
7 p.m., Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC INPUT
Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any item not included on the regular
agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address for the
- - -Clerk's-record, and limit-their remarks to five minutes.. -= -
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
6. MEETING MINUTES
6.1 Review and Approve Planning Commission Minutes of March 16, 2003
7. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL
7.1 Designate a Planning Commission Member to the April 27, 2004, City Council Meeting
8. CONCEPT REVIEW
8.1 John Lovelette, 3201 32nd Avenue, review requests for building a new home: (a) square
footage variance; (b) lot width variance; and (c) floor area ratio variance
9. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS
11. ADJOURNMENT
ADDRESSING THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Community/Open Forum.
In an effort to provide for full and open communication with the
public and in keeping with Roberts Rules of Order, the City
Council/Planning Commission uses Open/Community Forum to
gather information via public input. The following procedures
apply to Open Forum:
• _The Mayor/Chair will ask if anyone is interested in
speaking at Open Forum.
o Speakers fill out name and address at podium.
0 Citizens wishing to speak, should raise their
hands and approach the podium when recognized by
the Mayor/Chair, then clearly state full name and
address for the record. Spokespersons are given
more time for presentations, and groups are
encouraged to use them.
o Each person will be allowed five minutes to speak.
o A record of comments will be kept as part of the
official minutes of the meeting.
• Speakers must direct their comments to the City
Council/Planning Commission as a whole and not to one
particular member. - -
Speakers may not address topics that are already on the
agenda.
• Speakers are encouraged to comment on any aspect of
City business, but direct or inferred comments on
personality conflicts with City Council, Commission, or staff.
members will not be allowed.
• City Council/Planning Commission will not take official
action on items discussed during Open Forum, except to
refer items to staff or Commission for future report.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
4
5 March 16, 2004
6 7:00 p.m.
7
8
9 I. CALL TO ORDER
10 Chair Stromgren called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
11
12 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
13 Chair Stromgren invited the Commission and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
14
15 III. ROLL CALL.
16 Commissioners present: Chair Stromgren; Vice Chair Hanson; Commissioners Gray,
17 Hoska, Jensen, Tillman and Young.
18
19 Absent: None.
20
21 Also present: City Manager Michael Mornson.
22
23 IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
24
25 Motion by Commissioner Tillman, second by Commissioner Hoska, to approve the meeting
26 agenda as presented.
27
28 Motion carried unanimously
29
30 V. MEETING MINUTES.
31
32 5.1 Review and Approval—Planning Commission Minutes of February 17 2004
33
34 Chair Stromgren stated that he had a correction. He referenced page 4, line 23, the sentence
35 should end with `preexisting the zoning ordinance'.
36
37 Commissioner Young stated that she had a correction. She referenced page 7, line 22,noting a
38 typo. She stated that it should be City'Manager'Mornson not City'Manger'Mornson.
39
40 Motion by Vice Chair Hanson, second by Commissioner Young, to approve the meeting minutes
41 of the Planning Commission of February 17, 2004 as amended.
42
43 Motion carried unanimously
44
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 2
1 VI. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL
2 6.1 Designate a Planning Commission member to the March 23 2004 City Council Meeting
3
4 Chair Stromgren stated that he would attend the City Council meeting on March 23, 2004.
5
6 VII. PUBLIC HEARING.
7
8 7.1 Frank Peterson setback variance request for property located at 2601 —31"Avenue
9 Northeast.
10
11 Chair Stromgren opened the Public Hearing at 7:03 p.m.
12
13 City Manager Morrison stated the Planning Commission had a Concept Review for this request.
14 He explained that the request is for an 11-foot setback variance to allow construction of a three-
15 season porch. He further explained that the ordinance requires a 30-foot setback and the property
16 owner would have a 19-foot setback, if approved. He stated that the applicant currently meets
17 the requirements for lot coverage and other setback requirements. He stated that the Building
18 Inspector has determined that a side yard set back is required versus a front yard because it is a
19 corner lot. He noted that they have latitude to interpret the various setbacks on a corner lot in
20 order to decide what would make the most sense for each situation. He reviewed the Public
21 Hearing notification process with the Commission stating that the Public Hearing was published
22 in the local newspaper and a notice was mailed to property owners located within 350-feet from
23 the applicants address. He indicated that the City did receive four phone calls regarding the
24 property and explained that there were no problems,just curiosity with respect to what was
25 happening with the property. He noted that the property owner is available for any questions.
26
27 Frank Peterson explained that he and his wife are requesting an 11-foot setback variance to allow
28 them to construct a three-season porch. He reviewed the location with the Commission noting
29 that the porch would face 30th Street Northeast. He indicated that he had researched the area to
30 locate other homes that have built 30-feet from the curb line noting that there are several in his
31 area. He reviewed his findings with the Commission adding that the porch would also allow his
32 wife to spend some time outside the house in the summer. He noted that she has a medical
33 condition that would not allow her to go outdoors otherwise.
34
35 Commissioner Tillman noted the fence around Mr. Peterson's yard and asked how long it had
36 been up. She asked if the fence would require a variance. City Manager Morrison clarified that
37 his fence was probably installed prior to the ordinance and is grandfathered.
38
39 Commissioner Tillman noted the tree in the front yard and asked if it would remain. Mr.
40 Peterson confirmed that the tree would stay. He explained that the porch would only extend one
41 foot past the sidewalk.
42
43 Chair Stromgren closed the Public Hearing at 7:08 p.m.
44
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 3
1 Commissioner Tillman noted that in giving this request consideration she drove through the area
2 to get a feel for the characteristics of the locality and homes in the neighborhood. She referenced
3 the conditions of approval: altering the characteristics of the locality; does not affect reasonable
4 use; a hardship was not created by the owner. She stated that in her review of the neighborhood
5 and surrounding homes she noted that the porch would not alter the characteristics of the locality
6 nor would it deter reasonable use or access to the main structure/home. She also acknowledged
7 Mrs. Peterson's asthma stating that the addition would allow Mrs. Peterson an opportunity to
8 enjoy the outdoors in a protected environment. She noted that they are stretching the
9 requirements a bit adding that the proposed addition would not alter or deter from the appearance
10 of the surrounding neighborhood.
11
12 Commissioner Hoska agreed stating that he too drove through the area a couple of times. He
13 noted that several homes were set back and forth along the streets. He stated that in considering
14 the entire situation, in general, he has not found a reason why they shouldn't recommend the
15 request to City Council. He stated that the Petersons have a very nice, well-kept home and that
16 the porch would make a nice addition.
17
18 Vice Chair Hanson noted another consideration for approval was whether the request would add
19 value to the property. He stated that this addition would raise the value of the property and
20 agreed that it would make a nice addition. He expressed his agreement with Commissioner
21 Tillman stating that they are stretching the requirements a bit adding that they have done it
22 before.
23
24 Motion by Commissioner Tillman, seconded by Vice Chair Hanson, to recommend that City
25 Council grant the applicant's request for an 11-foot side-yard variance under the criteria that first,
26 a hardship was not created by owner; the home is on odd shaped lot and like that when
27 purchased; the structure would not alter the locality; economic considerations not applicable; and
28 due to extenuating circumstance for Mrs. Peterson's health.
29
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31
32 Chair Stromgren stated that City Council would consider this request at their March 23, 2004
33 Regular meeting. He suggested that the Peterson's be present to answer any questions the
34 Council might have.
35
36 7.2 Tires Plus, conditional use permit and administrative subdivision for property located
37 adjacent to the TCF on Silver Lake Road.
38
39 Chair Stromgren opened the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m.
40
41 City Manager Morrison stated that the applicant, Tires Plus, is purchasing two lots and 27 feet off
42 of a third lot from TCF, their neighbor to the north. He stated that because part of one lot would
43 stay with Tires Plus and one part of the lot would remain with TCF a public hearing is required to
44 approve the dividing of an existing lot. He reviewed the request with the Commission stating
45 that the applicant is currently located next to the City Liquor store on the west side of Silver Lake
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 4
1 Road. He stated that the existing building is being purchased and demolished to accommodate
2 the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. He indicated that two approvals are needed to accommodate
3 the new Tires Plus, approval of the conditional use permit and approval of an administrative
4 subdivision. He reviewed the lot size with the Commission noted that based upon the submitted
5 size, no variances are required for the Tires Plus building. He stated that at the request of
6 Commissioner Tillman copies of minutes for three previous conditional use permit issues,that
7 are automotive related,have been included in the packet for their review. He summarized stating
8 that the conditions placed on previous conditional use permits included submittal of landscaping
9 plans, dumping enclosures, sign plans, hours of operation and limits on outdoor storage. He
10 reviewed the notification process with the Commission stating that notice of the Public Hearing
11 was published in the local newspaper and a notice was mailed to property owners within 350-feet
12 of the property. He stated that he did not receive any phone calls. He stated that if the
13 Commission is inclined to approve it could be done in one motion, contingent upon City
14 Attorney and City Engineer approval. He explained that the City Attorney would approve the
15 administrative portions and the City Engineer would approve the drainage and property concerns.
16
17
18 John Patterson,Designer, noted that Tires Plus has been providing service to the community for
19 many years and it is their desire to continue. He stated that the Civil Engineers are currently
20 working with City Staff and the Watershed District to determine the drainage issues and
21 reviewed with the Commission. He stated that the request meets all City Ordinance requirements
22 and referred to the packet provided for their review. He stated that the packet includes
23 photographs of the facility and proposed layout and reviewed the elevations with the
24 Commission. He provided Commission with overview of the exterior materials and monument
25 board sign noting that the sign would match the materials used on the building.
26
27 Commissioner Tillman asked Mr. Patterson to review the proposed landscaping design. Mr.
28 Patterson explained that they are not completely clear, at this point in the project, on the
29 ordinance requirements. He stated that recommendations have been made regarding ground
30 cover noting that decisions have not been made yet regarding the design.
31
32 Chair Stromgren suggested that they review TCF and other surrounding commercial properties to
33 get a better idea of the landscaping styles in the area.
34
35 Commissioner Tillman referenced the trees in the back stating that they seem to be a bit small.
36 She suggested more fill near the spruce trees.
37
38 Chair Stromgren stated that the two buildings that are adjacent to them are four-side buildings
39 whereas Tires Plus is not. He suggested that they try to soften the look around the building more
40 with the landscaping.
41
42 Mr. Patterson suggested that, if the Commission recommends approval, it could include a
43 contingency that they continue to work with staff towards an acceptable landscaping design. He
44 stated that their consideration for their request is appreciated
45
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 5
1 Commissioner Tillman asked Mr. Knapp to clarify their hours of operation. Mr. Knapp stated
2 that the proposed hours of operation are 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; 9:00
3 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays; and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Sundays.
4
5 Chair Stromgren referenced the eastern property line and asked for further clarification of the
6 layout. Mr. Knapp reviewed the area with the Commission noting that 2.8 would be the largest
7 number. He stated that depending upon the ordinance, they would work to meet the
8 requirements.
9
10 Chair Stromgren stated that the ordinance allows for 1-foot cantilevers. Mr. Patterson assured
11 the Commission that they could meet that requirement.
12
13 Commissioner Tillman referenced the outdoor storage of vehicles and asked if they anticipate
14 storing any vehicles outside, on the property, overnight. Mr. Knapp explained that the customers
15 usually pick up their vehicles on the same day. He further explained that if the vehicle is not
16 picked up that day they pull the vehicles inside the building for the night. He stated that they do
17 this for the aesthetics and for safety. He stated that they generally have no more than 8 vehicles
18 in the lot at any given time and reviewed with the Commission.
19
20 Commissioner Tillman expressed concerns regarding the number of vehicles parked on the lot.
21 She stated that she would like to see no more than two vehicles stored outside at any given time
22 and for no longer than 72 hours. Mr. Knapp assured the Commission that this would not be a
23 problem. He explained that they too are concerned noting security and the potential for
24 vandalism. He assured the Commission, that as a general rule, vehicles do not remain on the lot
25 overnight.
26
27 Vice Chair Hanson asked if they have come to an agreement with TCF for access off 39`h. Mr.
28 Knapp confirmed that they have come to an agreement and reviewed the access easement with
29 the Commission. He stated that they would also place a `No Trucks' sign to discourage use. He
30 indicated that they would also make arrangements with the delivery people to have their trucks
31 enter and exit the premise off Silver Lake Road. He stated that they have also been in
32 discussions with TCF as to various partnerships between the businesses and are committed to
33 looking for ways to help each. He stated that they are happy with the location noting that TCF
34 would make a good neighbor. He noted that they are looking forward to the new location.
35
36 Vice Chair Hanson noted the area proposed for a future office building and asked if they are still
37 planning to build. Mr. Knapp stated that they have not made any decisions about the building
38 yet. He explained that they are waiting for the final estimation from the Watershed noting that
39 they might have to create a retaining pond in the back. He further explained that the building is
40 not something they are planning to do right away. He stated that they would like to get the
41 current store up and operational first and then determine what would fit best within the
42 development of the area. He indicated that this would not happen for at least two years.
43
44 Vice Chair Hanson asked if they would still require the additional 27-feet if the Watershed says
45 they cannot build another building on the property. Mr. Knapp explained that the additional 27-
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 6
1 feet involves legal descriptions of the property and reviewed with the Commission. He stated
2 that they would still require the additional 27-feet for parking and to give depth to the area where
3 they pull vehicles out from the bays.
4
5 Chair Stromgren closed the Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m.
6
7 Chair Stromgren stated that the conditions are consistent with previous conditional use permits
8 for similar facilities in the area. He noted that the hours of operation and.storage are also
9 consistent. He agreed with City Manager Morrison that the requirements would have to meet the
10 approval of the City Attorney and the City Engineer. He stated that they would also continue to
11 work with Staff on the additional landscaping and apply city code for the site lighting.
12
13 Commissioner Tillman suggested that they ensure that all sign ordinance requirements are met.
14 Mr. Knapp stated that he would work with Staff on the actual measurements, as required by the
15 ordinance.
16
17 Vice Chair Hanson suggested that they clarify and include the hours of operation in the
18 conditions. He suggested 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays.
19
20 Commissioner Hoska stated that the hours on Sunday are workable noting that it is actually nice
21 that they are open on Sundays. He stated that he has visited the store a few times on a Sunday
22 and was thankful they were open and available.
23
24 City Manager Momson suggested that they be more restrictive with the vehicle storage. He
25 expressed concerns stating that they do not want to have to do additional policing of the area. He
26 stated that it would be easier on both the business and staff with respect to any potential issues.
27
28 Commissioner Hoska stated that he would still like to see the 72-hour limit noting that they have
29 been very good citizens and neighbors. He agreed that most of the customers are very good
30 about picking up their cars at the end of the day. He stated that they could always rescind the 72-
31 hour limit if they violate or begin to overuse.
32
33 Commissioner Gray agreed with Commissioner Hoska stating that many people tend to drop
34 their vehicles off the night before. He expressed concerns stating that it restricting the overnight
35 parking would also adversely affect the customer.
36
37 Chair Stromgren suggested allowing storage for up to two cars for 72 hours with possible fines if
38 in violation.
39
40 Chair Stromgren asked if a Conditional Use Permit would stay with the property or follow the
41 business. City Manager Mornson clarified that the Conditional Use Permit would stay with the
42 property noting that if someone purchases it would remain with the property.
43
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 7
1 Chair Stromgren expressed concerns stating that if the repair business increases they would have
2 to reapply for a more stringent Conditional Use Permit. City Manager Morrison agreed noting
3 that the residents of the area would monitor the business.
4
5 Motion by Commissioner Tillman, seconded by Commissioner Gray,to recommend, to City
6 Council, the approval of a conditional use permit and the following conditions of subdivision:
7 Hours of Operation: 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Weekdays; 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Weekends; 72
8 hour storage limit for no more than 2 vehicles; dumpster; landscaping and storage plans -
9 submitted to staff with the landscaping to be consistent with area; Reviewed and approved by
10 both the City Attorney and the City Engineer.
11
12 Motion carried unanimously.
13
14 Chair Stromgren stated that City Council would consider this request at their March 23, 2004
15 Regular meeting. He suggested that they be present to answer any questions the Council might
16 have.
17
18 VIII. CONCEPT REVIEWS.
19
20 None.
21
22 IX. PUBLIC INPUT.
23
24 None.
25
26 X. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION.
27
28 City Manager Morrison reviewed the recommended planning related work/training sessions with
29 the new Commissioners. He highly recommended that they plan to attend the Basics Course
30 scheduled for May 6h or June 19`h noting that they would be full day work sessions. He
31 suggested that they review their schedules and email Connie with the dates. He noted that
32 another good course to attend would be the `Role of the Planning Commissioner' and
33 recommended that they attend. He stated that the class is pre-paid in advance and encouraged
34 them to contact Connie, via email, with available dates.
35
36 City Manager Morrison noted that due to the Joint City Council\Planning Commission session
37 next month there would not be any public hearings at the next session. He stated that they might
38 have a couple of concept reviews that evening but no Public Hearings.
39
40 City Manager Morrison reminded everyone about the Bulldozer Bash scheduled for this Saturday,
41 March 20, 2004. He stated that it is amazing the amount of statewide media attention this event
42 is receiving noting that two to three television stations plus the Startnbune would be covering the
43 event. He indicated that they would also have extra security for the evening and encouraged
44 everyone to come out and enjoy the night. He stated that the actual demolition of mall is
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 16, 2004
Page 8
1 scheduled for April 4, 2004. He stated that things are moving along quickly noting that the
2 construction fencing has already been installed around the area.
3
4 Commissioner Gray asked for an update on the Stone House site.
5
6 City Manager Mornson stated that the retail portion is starting to come together. He stated that
7 they anticipate completion by June 1, 2004 noting that four businesses have already moved in,
8 the municipal liquor off-sale will begin to move in the first week of May, and six more slotted to
9 move in after completion. He stated that the Customer Appreciation event is scheduled for the
10 last week of June. He referenced the rumors currently circulating around the community
11 regarding the restaurant portion that speculates that Spectators has withdrawn from the project.
12 He clarified that the rumors are not true noting that negotiations are in progress. He stated that
13 this is very common with projects like this adding that they would probably know within the next
14 three weeks if the restaurant,will be Spectators or another restaurant. He assured the
15 Commission that a restaurant would go in at this site noting that the City Council clearly stated
16 that a restaurant site should be built that would also provide charitable gambling funding for the
17 City youth programs.
18
19 City Manager Mornson referenced Silver Lake Village stating that the City would like to
20 encourage as much public involvement in this development as is possible. He stated that the
21 Developer plans to do several ground breaking ceremonies throughout year and encouraged the
22 Commissioners to attend when possible. He noted that the first is scheduled for April 4 with
23 the demolition scheduled for April 5th. He stated that they plan considerable retail for the area
24 noting that they are in the process of putting together the plans and specifications for the 39th
25 Avenue area. He stated that a lot is happening in the area right now adding that he would keep
26 the Commissioners updated.
27
28 M. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
29
30 None.
31
32 XII. ADJOURNMENT
33
34 Motion by Commissioner Hoska, second by Commissioner Tillman, to adjourn the meeting at
35 7:53 p.m.
36
37 Motion carried unanimously.
38
39 Respectfully submitted,
40
41
42 Bonnie Sullivan
43 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 04/14/04 MEETING DATE: 04/20/04
TO: Chair Stromgren & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: 3201 32"d Ave NE Demolition/New Construction - Concept
Review
Requested Action:
At the April 20, 2004, Planning Commission meeting, John and Joan Lovelette are
requesting a concept review of three variance requests, which are required for the
construction of a new home at 3201 32"d Avenue NE. The petitioners will return to the
May 18 Planning Commission meeting for a public hearing on the variance requests.
The City Council will review the requests at their May 25 meeting.
Background:
The petitioners plan to demolish an 80-year-old home currently on the property and build
a new, two-story 2,783 square foot home. The subject property measures 50 X 175.The
variances necessary to complete the project include a square footage variance as the
subject property's lot size is under the minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet, at 8,750
square feet. Therefore, the petitioner is requesting a 250 square foot variance for this
requirement. Also, minimum lot width is 75 feet and the subject property's lot width is 50
feet. Therefore, the petitioner is requesting a 25-foot variance for this requirement.
A third variance being requested by the petitioners is for floor area ratio (FAR). The floor
area maximum is 30 percent of the lot, or 2625 square feet in this case. The proposed
home would exceed the floor area ratio requirement by 99 square feet with the lot
measuring 8750 square feet and the proposed floor area calculated by the City's
Building Official is 2724 square feet. The plan shows 2752 square feet on the first and
second floors. The variance to meet the City's FAR requirement would be in the amount
of 99 square feet. Please note there is a discrepancy in the square footage from what
the Building Official figures and the petitioner's plan. The basement level and garage
square footages are excluded from the FAR calculation. The petitioners are not in
agreement with the City's calculation of FAR, as you will note from their application
attached.
Staff has not yet received a site plan/survey depicting the home's footprint on the lot.
However, this has been requested of the petitioner for the May public hearing. This site
plan will be necessary to verify setbacks, lot coverage, etc. The petitioner has submitted
a hand drawing.
As far as the square footage and lot width requirements, precedence for cases like this
has been the City Council has approved such requests because of the unique
circumstances and limitations surrounding the smaller lot size. The FAR requirement is
another issue. The reason for the requirement is to limit the mass of a structure. Last
Page 2— 3201 32nd Avenue NE - Concept Review
year the City Council took the garage dimension out of the FAR calculation to make the
FAR not as stringent.
Attachments:
o Variance applications
o Home Plans
a Hand Drawn Site Plan
Date: 4 0
Fee: (D•00
R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
Applicant: J o V" G. -t- oa- M. I,Ovt lt'-Phone: to l Z- 7g1-9oto
Address: Zito 0. 57? 4!!A .en l
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.):
Legal Description of property proposed for variance:
Street Address: 3291 ' 32 -& 4vF &/E Sr.- AAIE�,�l r y.�n/ ss fIF
Presently Zoned:
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance. would relieve an undue hardship, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced. t size of sa peop4--l/ A i s cP% ns%ons of
�y 175 jh d4p4l%. 1o+aj square 4o�t e- of pro)oe,fy -fotdls 8,750. /AAs -f::j)of'-'j iS
Z5o 5q 4.2--e f�e✓f sI-Lo/'-f- o4 i-LZe- 9r00o Syrcare -{Uof ✓'e. be able
4'o Go 4 s�v u c.+' -4 yv-w d w e"1►'l..-q I r, P 12-U- o 4-- -i-1.c e_y i s j-i Ka d we l(i Kv ox 4.-Le- p eo p
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district. -7-At- pe�- izwre- zaou.19 211ow -Yl L. 2ppl�'�ayc
jS+4,& ZbvvG -/- e. Sole, ",, /h io✓idr
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
�! off' /XIt,IX Aas oh!y � in71CeZ-sf o� app1•ta,%ft /aAe, Q
above. In,'c l,_ oZS rtes6n J�yr rGct*t f l p urrh2 rrocJ, 44-e. ?ro,,a,l/
f
Signature of licanit_
so
xr
Variances. (1665.06)
Application. An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply
with the Zoning Code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed.to be
constructed, may apply Ior a variance upon payment of the fee as specified in the.
Zoning Ordinance.
Council Approval. Variances to the dimensional provisions of the Zoning Code may
be granted by the Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, after a
public hearing is held by the Planning Commission. Variances will not be granted
with respect to uses. A majority of affirmative votes by the Councilmembers present
is required to approve a variance request.
Evidence. No variance.will be granted unless the evidence presented by the petitioner
discloses all of the following facts:
(a) The subject matter of the application is within the scope of the Zoning
Ordinance subsection regarding variances.
(b) Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship
because: :
1:) The property cannot be put to. a reasonable use without the
variance.
2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the
owner.
3.) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality.
4.) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship.
(c) The circumstances.causing the hardship are unique to the individual
property under consideration.
(d) The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code.
Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission will consider the
application at a public hearing at any regular or special meeting. Notice for the public
hearing will be given in accordance with Section 115 of the City Ordinance. The Planning
Commission, sitting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, will make a recommendation
to the Council as follows:
(a) Recommend that the variance application can be granted because the
evidence considered at the meeting supports each of the findings
Date: 9 /0 I
Fee: &o•e>O
R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
Applicant: Phone:
Address: Z c to tom• �••�o�• T-��a c� , 5T -4••j1..n,,,.,
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): O�
Legal Description of property proposed for variance:
Street Address: 3zol 3Zr,& 4Aje M. c. ST /q ;. . Ss4lV
Presently Zoned:
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance. would relieve an undue hardship, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced. . ;cL4—. * s z,-J- z&A-Yess i 5 So ' d a,+4--
41A,v. �..)i ct'�1-• wt i w�u w. a s s'l e-• -tA r JLI.
tot1 40 GC w S{,rat4�'E G � �� C� Wt-1 l K�•
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district. 7 k;S V z C fZ. ;vti cor.
v�r �ZwC.Q. .1'ar �D"f $C'ld2yR tDO1 url �hilxsawr L.ro�C(� otJ �U►�Y
Gnv.i-}�'.:�-t- a �,..o►M.t. -�� •-t'l..t,,',r -t"0.w. :t�
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
-rke-. lot is so leJ`f �'- f -�-H, p"'pos- o f s z et C-4 ,.o o-4-
e ls� -�o r a-N-�j o�� ,r.eaSa�. �}-��. bw�es ��y a. ►�e� l.�,,,e. oh �-i-.
Signature of Ap6ficant
,,�2d 4/s/4/
Variances. (1665.06)
Application. An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply
with the Zoning Code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed.to be
constructed, may apply for .a variance upon payment of the fee as specified in the
Zoning Ordinance.
Council Approval. Variances to the dimensional provisions of the Zoning Code may
be granted by the Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, after a
public hearing is held by the Planning Commission. Variances will not be granted
with respect to uses. A majority of affirmative votes by the Councilmembers present
is required to approve a variance request.
Evidence. No variance.will be granted unless the evidence presented by the petitioner
discloses all of the following facts:
(a) The subject matter of the application is within the scope of the Zoning
Ordinance subsection regarding variances.
(b) Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship
because:
1:) The property cannot be put to. a reasonable use without the
variance.
2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the
owner.
3.) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality.
4.) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship.
(c) The circumstances.causing the hardship are unique to the individual
property under consideration.
(d) The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code.
Plannine Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission will consider the
application at a public hearing at any regular or special meeting. Notice for the public
hearing will be given in accordance with Section 115 of the City Ordinance. The Planning
Commission, sitting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, will make a recommendation
to the Council as follows:
(a) Recommend that the variance application can be granted because the
evidence considered at the meeting supports each of the findings
Date:
Fee: °O
R-1 . . . . . . $ 60.00
Other . . . . $100.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Petition for Variance
o IM, C �e. I,o�c Ic -
Applicant: L fft- ,Jam w(• Phone: 10 f 2 - 7 S/-�OZD
Address: 2-910 ST L--- nti j
Status of Applicant (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.): OL,)r-t�r'
Legal Description of property proposed for variance:
Street Address: 3-Loi 3an& AV-0- XJ. C. /MAf. S54It
Presently Zoned: 215 t-fir w-f
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied
for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets if
necessary.
L Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of
the parcel or lot, the proposed variance. would relieve an undue hardship, as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly
enforced. � l Lo lS.OS I t
-ss of—J te-1 SqL-ext .
S?50 5y . '�F• o �c� outs
2_ loon -I e-(L 1 -2-7 8 3 Sy. {1I. 'j �c w.o y�wu�.ti S�. �fS a AD�aedt vv.
S P (W 1`I on OroPoie� how. i S 2S/3. F�„is1
zi d ro wou.ld: ICA-• 7-(� P P
-F1 or 5Pa t�. bcSea ov. rn�sly c4- S9wa^E o� pro osrd k�r.Q .
2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary
circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district. -J -f'�e_ y1 r,"o- rep&..st r3 -7,6
cews �' -A,- p r6poS� [••aw..c_ w i f�•- a-4-f-&4 Ae- J&- f Z00w 5?&' �i(„t
30 %• loo r a rt.o- rte,},b 46
d A-r ^f c-oys ,/o
d t�+.th S L ow.S ous oot ou4a
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been
created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
Alo o W,e,r P a,✓,F r 0.1-- 14 A,.c-s 4- in V-kC_ 5c,-et p a.-ce� .-
:r-1,4,,.,, owncrS 1•3�l �avt .
Signature of App ant.
04 -15 -04 * 1 80 o00CK
Variances. (1665.06)
Application. An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply
with the Zoning Code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed.to be
constructed, may apply fora variance upon payment of the fee as specified in the
Zoning Ordinance.
Council Approval. Variances to the dimensional provisions of the Zoning Code may
be granted by the Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, after a
public hearing is held by the Planning Commission. Variances will not be granted
with respect to uses. A majority of affirmative votes by the Councilmembers present
is required to approve a variance request.
Evidence. No variance.will be granted unless the evidence presented by the petitioner
discloses all of the following facts:
(a) The subject matter of the application is within the scope of the Zoning
Ordinance subsection regarding variances.
(b) Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship
because:
1.) The property cannot be put to. a reasonable use without the
variance.
2.) The circumstances causing the hardship were not created by the
owner.
3.) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality.
4.) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship.
(c) The circumstances.causing the hardship are unique to the individual
property under consideration.
(d) The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code.
Plannina Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission will consider the
application at a public hearing at any regular or special meeting. Notice for the public
hearing will be given in accordance with Section 115 of the City Ordinance. The Planning
Commission, sitting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, will make a recommendation
to the Council as follows:
(a) Recommend that the variance application can be granted because the
evidence considered at.the meeting supports each of the findings
3Z01 3 2 ub 4VF AJe!5
4-WTI-k Ajy, AA1.
S :5 .1- 10
r - -e-s s //:571
was rt-e-e-h2�4 �/� ur�.ea� 6 �n C. .�oa-dt /?/l. Lo✓�.1e7'1�e.
� � y
' Z 2' ()144l,tfll' w,-4,k
s 1
l-vo`n s
ro/),C
u.r os2 D� �4 ur��Si fie. res���cam¢. waS �a
r�o✓e-
fie.. prolgte� a�nd- Av 6",'R
a
A o wt- r,J /cA A 4,5 A- c.,r sl),l A AW4
W
�.eGQ e S-kx - Q�.e�iCI/S Oki �4v rr.G�- G�c rtGQ �z /,Di�'J.
Way .
O F 3
�'
�v s
ULA c_ polod& rooms d n om, �lvo
y DtJh,erS ark mr u�e� ,6u-:�
o Ve r /3 /tars ,'M an cC /24z -
7I hoae_ �o Sva-y
fJ')Q/?
I
_ 2A-IV4
105,
9R LS
-ALAN : FREEDOM.i -SERMRS
SHEET NO. SHEET INDEXZ10 A Z10 6 Z10 - C
O NT'• COVER SHEET
the F RE M 1.2 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1.5 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
2.1 FOUNDATION PLAN - BASEMENT
GENE RAL NOTES : 2.6 FOUNDATION DETAILS
3.0 BASEMENT PLAN - BASEMENT
.
-All work shall comply with the 2000 International Residential Code, Applicable Local, State, County 3.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
and Federal Codes, Ordinances, Laws, Regulations and Protective Covenants governing the site of work. 3.1.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN OPTIONS
-All Con actors shall furnish all labor, equipment, materials, and perform all work necessary, indicated, 3.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
reasnably inferred or required by any code with jurisdiction to complete their scope of work. 4.2.1 ROOF PLAN B
- Ons.ite verification of all dimensions and conditions shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. 6.2,1 FRONT 4 REAR ELEVATIONS B
Noted dimensions take precedent over scale. Each Contractor shall report to the Field Manager any 6,2.2 SIDE ELEVATIONS B
discrepancy or other questions pertaining to the working drawings and/or specifications -7.2.1 BUILDING SECTIONS B
as detailed in the construction agreement. -7.2.2 BUILDING SECTIONS B
-All alternates and finishes are at the option of the owner and shall be constructed in addition to or in lieu of the SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL LAYOUTS
typical condition as per the specific job site selections and addendum available through the Field Manager. 8 O BASEMENT, FIRST E5.1 BASEMENT, FIRST $ SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL LAYOUTS
- Each Contractor shall be responsible for all work as outlined in the scopes of work, specifications and exhibits, q O KITCHEN � BATH PLAN DETAILS
as detailed in the construction agreement by and between Contractor and Centex Homes D.I DETAILS
D.2 DETAILS
AREA SCHEDULE D.3 DETAILS
LOWER LEVEL 1376 D.4 DETAILS
D.5 DETAILS
MAIN LEVEL 1376 �1.q'1 D.6 DETAILS
`s UPPER LEVEL D.8 DETAILS
TOTAL.-LIVING AREA 2783 D.10 DETAILS
D.11 DETAILS W
TOTAL CONDITIONED AREA 4159 D.12 DETAILS W
W
GARAGE 443 D.13 DETAILS =
D.14 DETAILS
D.15 DETAILS
D.16 FIREPLACE DETAILS W
O
U
mom:
�.:
de��aaby.
dmw by.
the kr d by.
date: �
sheet:
J
L
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 1
1 DRAFT
2 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
3
4 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING IVIINUTES
5
6 MARCH 23, 2004
7
8 CALL TO ORDER.
9 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
10
11 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
12 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
13
14 ROLL CALL.
15 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Stille, Thuesen, and Faust.
16 Absent: None.
17 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson.
18
19 CONSIDERATION,DISCUSSION,AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
20 ITEMS.
21
22 I. APPROVAL OF MARCH 23, 2004, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
23 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Horst,to approve the City
24 Council Meeting Agenda of March 23, 2004.
25
26 Motion carried unanimously.
27
28 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
29 None.
30
31 III. CONSENT AGENDA.
32 A. Approve March 9, 2004,regular Council meeting minutes.
33 B. Consider licenses and permits.
34 C. Consider payment of claims.
35
36 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to approve the Consent
37 Agenda.
38
39 Friendly amendment by Councilmember Horst requesting the removal of Consent Agenda Item
40 A. Councilmember Faust accepted the friendly amendment.
41
42 Motion carried unanimously.
43
44 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve Consent
45 Agenda Item A.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 2
1 Ayes—4.Nays—0.Abstains—1 (Horst). Motion carried.
2
3 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
4 None.
5
6 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
7 A. Planninsz Commission Items from March 16, 2004.
8 1. Resolution 04-029, re: Peterson, for 2601 —315` Avenue NE, variance request.
9 Planning Commission Chair Joel Stromberg noted Frank and Dolores Peterson, 2601 —3151
10 Avenue NE, had filed for an 11-foot side yard variance to allow construction of a three-season
11 porch. He explained the ordinance required a 30-foot setback and the property owner would
12 have a 19-foot setback if the variance was approved. He indicated the total square footage of the
13 property was 10,475 and the applicant currently met the requirements for lot coverage and other
14 setback requirements. He stated the Building Inspector interpreted that a side yard setback was
15 required versus a front yard setback because it was a corner lot and the City had the ability to
16 interpret the various setbacks on a corner lot based on what made the most sense from a zoning
17 perspective.
18
19 Chair Stromberg indicated the discussion among the Commissioners centered on the fact that the
20 placement of the house on the lot resulted from the house being built before the current zoning
21 ordinances were in effect and it was agreed this created a hardship for the owners that they had
22 not created. He noted the resolution cited the odd shape of the lot as a requirement for the
23 variance; however, he stated the real issue was that the placement of the house on the lot dictated
24 the position of the three-season porch.
25
26 Mr. Peterson indicated he and his wife were both"70 years young"and would like to have a
27 sunroom added to their home for health reasons. He explained his wife had asthma and could
28 not get outside often because of outside odors, etc., which affected her breathing. He added it
29 would not only be beneficial to him and his wife but also would enhance the neighborhood.
30
31 Councilmember Stille asked how long the fence had been located on the property. Chair
32 Stromberg responded, according to Mr. Peterson, the fence predated their purchase of the home,
33 which was five years ago.
34
35 Councilmember Horst stated he understood no residents spoke against the variance at the
36 Planning Commission hearing. Chair Stromberg responded that was correct.
37
38 Councilmember Horst asked if the porch would alter the character of the neighborhood. Chair
39 Stromberg responded it would not alter the character of the neighborhood. He added there were
40 a large range of setbacks represented in the area of the Peterson's home.
41
42 Councilmember Horst stated he assumed this would add value to the Peterson's home. Chair
43 Stromberg responded the Commission agreed it was an improvement of the home.
44
45 Councilmember Faust indicated he assumed the three requirements for a variance were met by
46 this request. Chair Stromberg responded they were, as the hardship was not created by the
I, - �f1J NNa D JyT�'P@y wyF,A ID r1-0y Oy 0 ' JPy+�NAa u/ry- �'1
4 A b N r u = o a O P a A�➢(.t /� O T P IP �. Q -A.
,T lluiim
IITT g� N
% ® Y I➢ F 1 II P >px �." 3) zy z A O F O zy `�yjo DY F �"z i Z O R ) r�m -ZPusa
6 a �Y C � >-+m 3���1��� �m �z°����°�mymmia $ ":° 1C
ampT�mmi � � �7nc�o�n��O�����t���p� �Y —
TMaT�y Z
V
�
g a P y -
omaF8 �� pAoA � � ) pZ °
m ` T D
> T Z A 7R @ m � a Ix
rn
p zygy s
t$g�
^' �12�@In
PWA p m r
��
)x5( A
_ •( (Qp A a b ))g O 7�pI 7pQ�pP - A)) R - G - L @ m m
OD j
[ $ =P AI m® »> y >a NNy
a ° ° P3 ��FIe � m�oAN
j1D' Z ]� }]yj1I �v Z 9 7Sp 7P p� y tly
N t�tpp tl b � � � b � � " •�� P � Ill � � @• N A =A
mp N a & 05
-09
N
�n p a v o Q (7�� cn� c��P(PSI y m< mp rm i
I
mY 1SNA°z°rsiy* r�QE� " NN y AnP�PP�A3mr y A pm$OD '��� b R� � � I N N I 1 0
l� Z In @@ ?:
h p'I -I
r Dg79977CC���O R 49 y IXrn�� SAyAon p1c,
y`D�yDO� mST>pOD rPb 11'y[.0Wc, `n�'�;� ��' OOO�� TPa ��ty�A
7700 (F� > z p
" Z a (� (P r7i?�
F m R
o
C r[ n� x yxaazz PP PP PPP@@PPT TTTTTTpTTTTTTTT 9TTTmT TyTmmk mmFn z ,�z.P1
<rx DK�y ���°y�0 AS A���c<�Z1A�r r0(iDDx���O"N"U r'gVNI�R�A��Z OPpgm��xv���O zi � r k {P _ xxx V
C ��� h3 fiP��� PP P@P PFFPyyy PT �� TppTpppTppp pTppp�TT'PT�gqq T'nTT5�1T`bT`�, D Dmmm ��13mm •• O X X x x aN•-� a(�-{ k%%X ..
o � RO p()m�RRm ARRm� r4gggg i� -r�1 bmmp fl P Ix(`
myi A4i � A SmW m � m p�n�W �dFyO�IOOI�I+PW M A y� O P 1�x r �x
A�r7i "� yy r TP m mk AI a mN TTI��r Ppp
rp
X
,'
A i
d «ffNNnnnn AAAA
TTTTyyTTTV T'0 I�I T TT py 3 I_Z _2 S_Z_ S>�y 3y 5 r<
r�N�NenY�YKyyQ �>> 040 zYY- Y yr� i (�j= j j Dz c�I�i Pgy�zIrII
pA PI Clip KnlZp_FR m rr7iz NA @ r��y 4� ��°°��IIII O (sz Tz fil rA D�2�A AAD y6y
�r ompPp �a� i�AA D8 Ao �pp AS� �aL w;
-1 -I-1-1 y�NAAN NNN NNy( yp aNNN 1P P NZII Ap 10 a1
yi 3 A�-�rT���-TT �r���000� y �gDD $g�[{pInryyr�i�0y �r Or T-
v Up�vmH 1j��p
lQ~ P m >mPpr i Z�5}T��bOy$�gA�SpNNm
A
m
O D V`I
222 '22 222 222 2^c � Z
A�S dT yO�S y�9 AT �>
$ z A
� rn
ar rn
(j) �� � Y
p z
CONSTRUCTION
NOTES
L
BORED HOLES
THAT BECOME BORED HOLES
CUTTIN& a NOTCHIN67 NOTCHES
(D D
n rn
MIN MIN MIN
MA MA;� ,
MAXIMUM ALLOWED NOTCHING FOR THE BORED HOLE BECOMES A NOTCH MAXIMUM ALLOWED BORING FOR 0
NORMAL CONSTRUCTION WITH 2x4 4 WHEN IT ENTERS THE 5/5° EDGE NORMAL CONSTRUCTION WITH 2x4 OR
2x6 5TUD5 2x6 STUDS
WHERE A BORED HOLE IS OVERSIZED,IT MUST BE U
' CONSIDERED A5 A NOTCH FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES :,"'
FOR REFERENCE SEE IRC 8602.6 OR IBC 2305.9.10 AND 2308.9.11 n/ WJ
STUD NOTCHING & BORING DETAIL FOR BEARING WALLS L�L 0
6 SCALE,N.TS.
2-Ti-04 -
(DtLdIS.d.+� Z
0
- BORED HOLES U
THAT BECOME BORED HOLES
CUTTING 4 NOTCHING -NOTCHES
Wby..
MIN MIN MIN
� MAXIL
_ drawn by.
checked by.
MAXIMWE
UM ALLOWED NOTCHING FOR THE BORED HOLE EECOME5 A NOTCH MAXIMUM ALLOWED BORING FOR data: 2.t4aa
NORMAL CONSTRUCTION WITH 2x4 4 WHEN IT ENTERS THE 5/5°EDGE NORMAL GON5TRUGTION WITH 2x4 OR
2x6 STUDS
2x6 5TUD5
WHERE A BORED HOLE IS OVERSIZED,IT MUST BE Sheet:
CONSIDERED AS A NOTCH FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES
FOR REFERENCE SEE IRC R602.6 OR IBC 2305.9.10 AND 2305.9.11 1 .3
STUD NOTCHING 8 BORING DETAIL FOR NON-BEARING WALLS
S;N-dl
14'-O' -
No-E.'
OAI
.'MNTAJM 42'HEIGHT FLOOR
I, I_—————————————, i I TO BOTTOM OF WINDOW SILL.
I I I II
F
7 a 4 I II
i3J I J I
T91 ; j III i9
-' I
I _ vJ1
NOTE.OVER FRAME 6514T WINDOW
I I DPEWNG5 I Irl'ALL.AROUND
V ciI I I ENTIRE PERIMETER OF WINDOW OPENING
O I I m'�i�I I I I FOR FV T.FINISH APFLILA710_N.
m I I nen%I I I
d nl __J I
O 10ry I ———_ BOLT LADDER
52 TO INTERIOR
DII FACE OF WALL
I I
D.11 I I I IDRAIN TILE
F I I I I AT WAL
DRAIN TILE F I I L I I FT6.LEVEL
AT WALKOUT
FTG.LEVEL
--- ------
I o
z0 I I SOLID FiB%PIPET I I <
- I I AT WALKOUT 6
U I I FT6.LEVEL. �--F
•� G ZIP STRIPS ; i Ii A
IL
I ! -
� z I I
I 9 '%96'x17' NATE.Cllf OUT LURE FOOT
x .FTS., WALL FOR LOLLMN LOCKS \Ny, .Q
O ITO SIT ON PT&.Ip I N
I
• � LAP END OF PIPE TO
LAP END OF PI 70 I N I I
I RESTRICT FLOW TO
.RESTRICT FLO T I I A OOKST _ I- —, I I WALKOUT TRENCH.
WALKOUT CHL.
_-___- I
I
< —
O
F
'UJ < I IZIP 5TRIPJ —J J I III <
Tm � --
T9J I I t ZIP STRIP I I I
141
TO CEN kR
D.IS
Ip•-alj' II. A a
OF
FTC. ---_--_ I TOL ri
DRAIN TILE EL I OF FT6. I I a
SMT.F76.LEVEL I I L —IOCKI FOOT I FOOT I I• o
N ` LOCKS 0 I P LOCKS PDa LQ
PURM •�
Q
< r------ ---
iE FOOT I I O f..�
LOCKS I f- -- — ----- I 10'-'li4' I I Q
11 I 0 7//..-� I 0 1 V2"LEDGE I N I I O
0 I L_��'JLL _J I I I 0 ZI STRIP W I I . /'►
F <gg — _—__
0 O I I .PPT& I I I I1 SOLID FL PIPE 1
_ _ I AT D 16HT
LL I I HVI.TISz-� I PT6.LEVEL. .
L MerER I
32 O O LOCATION a-loll
`5 1/2'LEDGE w I 141 II I 32 - \/
to I D.13 �
RII O.b J
I ZIP STP I r� LL I
FOOT
Q
I I II LoCKS II I I
PLOD R 1I I ORAJH TILE AT
F f--71r-(`E3~ I��� o I E9NOUT I 1 q BSMT.PTD.LEVEL
I L L I I
if,
-� J I
I I I I O
u-
--
I I ExCC' ATED --- --
--- — —
I I 105 ' I I 32 1 I
a I I vaa I I I B phI I
I I 1 I II
DRAIN TIL AT N I I M D 12 ravWons:
6ARAGE FTG1., I I I ROVIDE .% RK daW
LEMIE
ORTFOR
-- -----
--- ----- I FACE
ERIC RETURN.
I E E SIDE ELEL ATIONS.
~ 1 — ---- ------ — — designed by.
PROVIDE 4'xIY BRICK b-RIGID PVC SLEEVE dr,mTi by:
LEDGE SUPPORT FOR - FOR5EWER&WATER
etledced by.
FACE BRICK RETURN. COW 56TION
date: 2-74-06
SEE SIDE ELEVATIONS. 2•-0, Ib'-O" .-p
NOTE,DROP HND-WALL —
D 7r4 O F
STOOP ARE?.
FOR&
FOR GARAGE _ DOM FROM TOP
DOOR TRACK IB'-b• 16'-6• POURED WALL AT HOUSE
5E $IlEet.
20'-0' 3'-0 2 . 1
FOUNDATION TO FOUNDATION FOUNDATION TO POUNDA710
WALKOUT FOUNDATION PLAN J
-_ TOP OF FOUNDATIOn Ob2S'
. DROP B• 4.
" ®STOOP
4 MARINO ONLY
V
4 .1
cz
FOOTING DETAIL �s
' 2. SGALE3/B'=I'-O' II-26-OI to
(D_dppwd.drvn c� #„
• � (2xScala o22x34 Sheets) ,
u
. 1
m f 1'-4
AT
FOOTING DETAIL c FOOTING DETAIL LOCATION O �. o
FOOTING DETAIL � LOCATION ONLY
A FOOTING DETAIL SCALE:3/B'=1'-0' I-26-0I 2. SCALE:3/8"=1'-O' II-26-0I i
((pp cfp� (D_dprvc.drvc� 2. SCALE:3/8'=1'-0' II-26-01
SCALE:9/B'=I'-0'- II-26-0I (2x Scal 22x94 Shoats) (2x:5cale on 22x34 Sheets) (D_dp e.dwy)
(D_dowa.d°v91 (2x Scale on 22x34 Sheets)
(2x Sccale on 22x34 Sheets) _ � I
I
FOOTING DETAIL G FOOTING DETAIL
SCALE:3/B'=I'-0' II-26-01 51-ALE:3/8"=1'-O" II-26-01
. (D_ w (D_dpwgdwt�
(2x tale
ooAn 22x34 Sheets) 2x aeon 22x34 5haots)
9T Z
q
TOP OF FOUU)
°Ob25
NDATI
J�
w
NO L
4
• 0
Q �
I'-4" tevislotes:
mtc ara.n g-.
FOOTING DETAIL
SGALE,9/8"•1'-O' 10-OB-02 '
(Ddwc�
(2x pole on 22234 Sheets)
&aIgned by.
5�" drawn by.
Necked try:
1 date: 2-2404
Y -
m � sheet
4
1'-4- 2 .6
FOOTING DETAIL
FOOTING DETAIL SCALE:3/B=r-o' 0-06-02
SCALE:3/e•=r-c• n-26-OI dpwnAw
(D_dpwh.dwc� (Dx Scale 0J22x34 Sheets)
(2x ale an 22234 Sheets)
------------------
I I .
I I
I r.,r•r.
TJ.I
DENOTES BEARING WALL
T9J II' _ I DENOTES BALLOON FRAMI146
DENOTL---- ,
:1,-5 POINT LOAD
4-
4 2Y_5T1D5 UNLE55
r---� I OTHERWISE NOTED
WHEN NOT GALLED GUT
I I I POINT LOADS APPLY TO
• I I ( ALL ELEVATIONS
L---J I
DOVBLE STUDS MK UMMIR
I I ALL eEAHn,ONE STUD MORE
I 2 THAN THE N!EIE!R OF PLYS
61RD
23 I �v
v 9L
DS I
/ \^ V
I I
I I
----------------
I
ly I n
I
I I o
I m I
I I o
-
.
I �
I i
I I � V 1 R , I
I V4$
p. I PLRN I
u -------
N I I FU
TURE
ICH.
H.
I I
I I I I
-- L
I f O
I I
Z
I cW J
I I I I
I I I I
I FUTURE STORAGE W
I I I I
a I I I I
I I I I
N I I
I I
--------------
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I i
mvislom:
I I I I a.c amm br.
L----------------------J I I
-------------------
1 I
nj L------------------J
n
designed by:
. drawn by.
' checked by.
2O'-O' IS'-O' dam: 2-2404
sheet
3 . 0
WALKOUT BASEMENT PLAN J
' - SCALE I/B'•1'-O•
10 z% 2-
'FLUSH
2VERSA-LAMBF."S X D
ISOGR FLOOR BEAM 92 I O ,'� 2 G I \ O
I , KEri
TJJ �(� 1 v 1 NIS N d DENOTES BEARING WALL
- 2-1 9/4'x9 1/2'DROPPED I I v '121 M9 `e1 j" . ! Q ,,
VERSA=LAM BEAMS .F � T9J �1�'s'Y � OENOTE5 BALLOON FRAMING
F.R BEAM-1 Pn I �� `V � v 1 Q ♦ /
p I Q 1 C4 ce , DENOTES POINT LOAD
4-2x_STUDS UNLESS / \
3 1/2'x5 V4' - a � 1 'N O OTHERWISE NOTED A
CmL I M A� 11 NFEN HOT GALLED OUT .
10 POINT LOADS APPLY TO
1% ALL ELEVATIONS
TRUSS COMPANY To DGUBLE Brims WN.WDER
MAKE 5URE THERE II'XII'COLUMN �\ ALL BEAMS.ONE STUD MORE
Is A TRUSS CAVITY2�
THAN THE NUMBER OF FLYS
FOR 3 1/2'x5 1/4' i 3/4'SUBFLOOR 23 la'-1#" 3 O I LYS n.9 MAKINS LIP THE BEAM OR
PARALLAH COLUMN Q, 61RDE3L
TO 60 TrIRWGH 05 •`f
_
THE FLOOR SYSTEM. I I 3-9 50 I
R.O.1061 'x60 1/2'
7'-10- DR HT. 1
2-1 3/4'X11 T/B' R5A•L.AM HD
14'FLOOR M /
TRIP-SEs 9-2w0 S
FLOOR BEAM Of in O p x p I a 5 Q.y� O`tP
_x
TIa155 OVERHANG , _.-.
1-1 3/4' 2xb BRC.WALL 0.2
9 1/2•x3 1/4'
TRTD.PARALL A 4LL 0 m i-
2 n ' I
COLUMN "
o
I�b !-2x6 TRTD.s Mp 1p(
FAMILY OM
' TOP OF FTG.TO THE - FA _
ROOM 91'1
ST lb'GONG. OF FLOOR el 9'.I I/b' _ 1,7-1�7 b .
CI 4q STRIP FTG. a'^ I vy�l ni I9•-s•xl6•-O• 1 10 O .p `f
_ CARPET -
DAB 6.%'x12'GONG. 3 I/2'GONG FLOOR O o &��b, 42 _ I 1 QQ g4a
GGG W2 _ _ D.Ib 9 VDS6 1/4' I I S.'r
AI.EA H.TS. 6� Q6 _ I 40 1/2.11611 P FROM TOP OF
OVERFI.ANIG E O p x i V2 WALL W/ SUBFLOOR TO THE
NOTE.TRUSS rEa HEIGHT 1•-T 1$'-b- 1'-91' I PARALLAM COLUMN LOCATION -§ `-2ge WooD CAP SEE BorroM or FLOOR
x - SCALE,N.T.S O LL LL'ry 1 OPT.R MLIN6'A BEAM el
Is TAKEN FROM THE END 0 - "
TOF HEHE TRU55DE F THE 15 xINS18-b' ON SHEET 3.1.1 -b^ 4'x9-Irl'FLIFFi-
VERSA-LAKd m n d4 1-� ----4 =LAM BEAMS
BEAM�2 tt""
OUT5IDE OP VERSA-LAM TO OUTSIDE OF VERSA-LAM - TDJ DS I t]
I 1 R .I
IB15.•4
Iv
DIMENSION]TO FIRST RISER m O O
- OVERHANG TO OVERHANG � MUD 1. 1. - ...t - -'- \ v!-,h
PORCH TRUSS DETAIL "= it �T. S VINYLg 9'1'1
SCALE,1/b'-t'-0' _ y i)ry GAB.I
.I Q
1 of 2-2x10 FLUSH BEAR
O V
4 r ME ION FLOOR BEAM e4 -
P . C FIRST
7 ° I , DINING ROOM 01-1
HI S VERSA LAM• W-t VB' 6.
% N
34'b2 5/b
m 9-4'II-T' T` -
$I/2' I 2- 10 NDRS FLOOR �9 ``�
VINYL b'-OU4' �Qlv 0
p Z
u+.
2.6 40 I/2'NIGH PWDR. CHASE
HALF WALL At WOOD 9'-I VB' ^
CAP CENTERED ON
3 t/2'.5 1/4' 4'GONG.FLOOR t T GOLVMN VINYL.
PLLAM PRI
ARAVATE GARA E ® n I
COLUMN ^
oY 1a-6'1/B• 2/4
PARALLAM COLUMN LOG TI N 9'-2'x19'-II' Dl FOYER O
m 9'-1 1/b•'
5CALE,N.T.S. - O
B'11'.10'-a• --- DxR BLOCKING
O 'A'/'G'EL.AM V2'xS V4' VINYL - FOR PED.SINK.F
TRTD.PARALLAM FROM W.I.G. 28'-32 OFFS
m TOPPOF FOUNm� MALL I I FLOOR rT
9'-I Vb
In
p 146 LL
POINT LOAD va s'V1HYLe' I
Iv D.Is
\ FLOOR LINE � [
ABOVE D.15 Y
OM OF
< ( TET-P, 9/0 D R 9040 r
--------.-- Fjp 96 /2'x4b I,"R.O. •x 9 /B'R. 36 V2'.9p
♦ ♦ ---------- HT. 2- A '-10'MORE
3-2x HORS. -2x10 HO..
9 1/258 V4'TRTD.P COLUMN
9 4 giOF(TOP OP FOUNDATION TO THE II 0 1 1
_ BOTTOM OP ISER TRUSS. 4'-5' 4'-5' 3'-10•.. t� t' 7 Z LL
T72 T22 `�A O J
1-1 3/4•x9 V2' II
VERSA-LAM HDR N ll / /Q 2
2-I ER5A-1/' '• T 1
BOPPED VERSA• HD� II
--_ - _._._.=.=.c.=.1W_ D. - - -
R.O.16'-0'.T'-0' ` - - - - - - - - 1�� �, roW _.:
Ir -
�� L _ — — — — — —'— — — — — _�-- d� :
0 23
II D.$ 2'-O" t6'-0• 5-3' 3'-0' b'-9' 4fi 45
I a in D.'I DE
C 9/4•.9 I/2' II 16'-6' c `� .
VERA-SAH HDR II a FALSE HDR.
designed by:
i / drawn by.
II p H EL.•A' ` dledtetl by.
- - - 1 (NOTE SAHs AS&ABLE WI TH) \ date: 2.2404
20'-0' 15'-0' `OUT50M OF FRAMING
TO YERSA=LAM -
3 4i 4q $,
sheet:
D.B
NOR.LOCATION WITH E
raorE G.v4e Ib'AS HIP END PIDTH, ourso,E OF FRAMING FIRST FLOOR PLAN EL. 3 1
-b' TO VERSA-LAM l�
SGALEI/b"al'-O" - w
l G ALL
FIRST FLOOR PLAN EL. 8
J
SCALE
la,-1
2 3 4 KEY,
9J1 1.I3 TJ3 DENOTE5 BEARING WW.
2/6 9Ji! T33 T33
--------- - 931 133 T3.2 DENOTES BALLOON FRAMING`
(V DENOTES POINT LOAD
4-2x_STUD'UNLE55 i0
5/O BF ♦
OTHERHI5E NOTED e
YaIEN NOT CALLED VT
• POINT LOADS APPLY TO
-4i'
-Li-ELEVATION5
DOUBLE STUD'MIK UNDER
1 - ALL BEAMS,OIC STUD MORE
v
.147-111" Z 7� �j-#s' 23 MMaaN66 UP TTHE HE BEumm AM a R
23 D5 61ROM
BEDROOM#4 Ds
7 6'-I I/B• .�D36T
PERED .26(6 L W I/2'
O_ u'-I'x13'-b• 3
RD.%I/ 'z60 I/2° RD.96 /2 60 I .0.98x42 I/_ PLYWOOD
CARPET - 89 I!2' R.M. D51 .Hi 69R Mi. 26'NI .45'LONG
2-2n1 HDR5. 2-2x R5. 2-2x DRS.
� xm
- c 29n 132 � I
GPTIONP.L VAULT D.14
mn 4 I
16 m 4 MASTER BEDROOM vIASTER BATH Z
R.O.42 TI/
b0 I/2' b'-I Va' 2 .as I/ R.NT aO 16•-6'x16'-0' BD_ .G. "^
2-2xDRS. �j CARPl3T v6�n' V89>3b. O
• OFT.VAULT LINE - b .13'11' I Q
22
IDS
FU¢R OUT WV.L5 W •, g•ip 2.5,1-y/ I
D.I 1LYER OF THERMO-PLY SHOVER -1 ki�V
.I tV X14 1
BEDROOM #4 FLOOR PLAN `BMaIN BA --------�
SCALE:I/b'z 1'-0' Q I6 94 1/8
2 np D.4 *to
VINYL Y%ASH
-. I •:� 4-1 4111 =—JJID YERJ�``����I BOX
n iv ,..6,s} p> L"q{ LAUNDRY
VIH.TO IR5r b a'-I ua• r
K R15ER l'-9•x10'-r O
X9.0 2/4VINYL •Lr F J O
_ a
40 Ill'H16H
4 c -n V2 MALL W IB'-3#• 5'-IO�J•i I I'-5° B'-3s' 0 Y
lJ7 Ory on.
ricop
RAILINGCAP
T33 a
937 SEE SHEET 93
-------------------- -
_ II
---------------- ————I I�
lV
V S 5/0 BF_ _J I -iI S/I BF K�l9/O BF n
O Q
BEDROOM 2 4 c v 11 9# s o" s-si s� B•-s$.
N
a• IIB
RO.'36It •x-0 I/2' D.14
03 1/2• 49R.HT ' -
2-2.IC rOR5. a'n LOFT/0PT.BE0R00M#4 BEDROOM #3 BEDROOM 02
5'-1 UB' 8'-I VB• 0'-I IB' Ul 0 -O II'-I'xl6'-5' II'-I'xl2'-b' II'-I'xl2'-0' - O
2��• `� - CARPET CARPET CARPET -
o � J
D�
tea••
'1
A°6'C•EL.
5EGOND FLOOR PLAN EL. G Jz
p
SCALE,1/&'-1'-0' 2-3 26-o• - i � O
83 V2' DR HT.
RD.42 I/ 'xbo 1/2' .42 I/ 'x60 1/2• 2-1 4'x9 1/2' RSA°LAM HDRS.
85
1/2' DR HT. 63 1/2' DR HT. v
2-2x1 HDR5. 2-3xiC HORS.
A a til EL. W
23 v.1 '^
D.5 v J
KMA LL UNFS
- --17�--- ------- -- --lx.p°
6-3'
�I � revisltuls:
II'-9#' b'-2 I 3'-23• II'-9#• dm: aa.n Gr.
201-01 s o
35-0
designed by. _
-I1,16'B'. dfawn by:
4'-a#'• 4'-41• 4'43' -
. .. ` chaek6d by.
y date: 244-06
OPTIONAL RAILING IIBII DETAIL 1^'�\
SCALE.I/B'•I'-O' Sheet:
5EGOND FLOOR PLAN EL. AkB 3 .2
5,-ALE.Ub'°I'-O-
J
2 3 4
13J 7.2.2 -133
2l
TYPICAL
D5
BUILD NS
LIM
LINE
j ",\ `i�t'='''.::� .�r�<: .,r ``` -'-`s"r:r, :;'�Li;�„� '�•.��>�,`.� Z>.i,•���<t���'.:.•'
i Note: An Ice barrier that consists of atleast two layers of underlayment cemented together �Y�_
` V
:or of a self-adhering polymer modified bitumen sheet, shall be used In lieu of normal
` ` s �\ f
. a to a point atleast 24 inches (G 1 0 mm) Inslde )1 t'�� ) rI TYPICAL
underla ment and extend from the eave's ed
!the exterior wall line of the bulldin
�. ----- ------------- '
Dormer Area 3 Car
Roof Location House Porch Garage TYPICAL
;�A `''''' NIP LINE
A B C Garage
TYPICAL ROOP
Total Attic Area(511t.) (455 :2t? Na
15G f 4L? Na VENT AS PER °e" \\\ �)
TYPICAL \ - �' ,
euIL NE L--_—
Total Vent Area Required(sq.In.) (I) LINE
(Attic Area/300)'144 G95 58 #### 99 150 134 ###### � '', `H` ;`
(Atilt Area/150)•144 for unln5ulated porch d garage rooks'
349 58 #### 50 14 ; = i \
Ridcge Required
pe.Q 61 Sq. in.ea. G I ####
sq. m 349 r 150 134 ###### ail
5offlt Required 8 7 ###### a `.` ` \
z
lin.ft. Q 19.GAin.ft. 18
_ t \ ... 27
I _ —______ .— —_—__ !-- _.._.__{ • ', '`I`�'\
TYPICAL
6:
RIDGE LINE
To be filledfjn ��ajft_ 1-- -- --- -- ------ --- ---- --- Wd
Ir \. ' — — -- ----
I) The Total Vent Area Required (sq. In.) Is determined by the following formula: —_i `- ;-=-J - "`
-- Total Attic Area (sq.ft.)/ 300 X 144 (sq.m./sq. ft.). ROOP
''..". `\::..\ VENT TYFII
2) Roof vents must obtain 50% of the required vented area while the remainder
1 well be vented at the sofFlt. The number of required roof vents Is determined — m
TYPICAL
,.—_.. j NIP LINE `
>,` `�
! by the following formula: Total Vent Area Required (sq. In.)/ 2/ G I (5q. m.)sq. – WP LINE \, `> ,.�. VALTYPICAL
612 \�:'." LINE
! ft.). The required lineal soffit venting Is determined by the following formula:
Total Vent Area Required (sq. In.)/ 2/ 19.G (sq. In./lin. ft.). \,� •;`
3) At dormers an additional 1/300 ventilation of the actual dormer area will beattic area already vented at the I/300 - LL
provided over and above the total a i �, \\`.. �,
P
requirement. To do this repeat step I . ;
j.O
Notes: \ '\ `\� j\c� } \ \
r required
In roof area where structurals feasible) fo
All dormers to be open to ma ( Y \�.,.�.�::..::>.,:::::.<�:\:r:��;:><:.: i:...>>:.:a.: :�: .•.:':�,:;-<::.�.•��' 6:12 6:12 �� _-•. �: 2�
_
! ventilation and vented Individually per plan. I 2-I 4:1 TYPICAL D.s
! 1 26 I VALLEY LIM
Roof vents to be spared equally alon roof 12" from ridge. 1
es to e
Ins
to Iled
In every
attic
truss s
ace
x
48' air chat b I
22" fY
p
1_.—
I
by.
! For roof flashing additional Ice barrier Information see detail#3. 1 2") - r
xPICAL KEY,
i ..— -- .—._._.._..._...._.._.....�_—__._____._..—_._— _—._...... � D9 NIP LINE .
r LOCAATEr
TION
I•la'f'2TTER5 AND DOM SPOUTS DO NOT APPLY designed by
Erewn by
L d by
date:L L ROOF PLAN EL. B sera' 2-uo`
SCALE.V5,-I'-O- —
sheet:
4 .2 . 1
J
12 12
' 1
2ND PLOOR PLATE HT.
.-
2ND FLOOR HDR HT. .
. --------------------- ------------------------------ ___-_❑ --------------------------- ❑ -- -----------------------.
7 41
le
41!
m —
___SND FLOOR
-------- ------ ---------------------- ------------------ ----------------------
Y IST FLOOR PLATE HT. ` ______________
. _ .___________________ _ --------------------------------------I_ ____________________________________________________
15T FLOOR HDR HT-
1 �
ir
1 1 1
I
.1 1.11 11 h 11 1 r n urn ,t nrrtnTnrnnn ?nnlnfRn -1r n rn
tun l u n u n n u n n u n u lnl n n n u u
-----------------------
nun nun un nn nnnnl n u nununn®
1ST FLOOR
ri B� .FLOOR PLATE HT. nn n nn I I I
. BSMT.-FLOOR_1•I�R HT_ -----------------------
___________________________
r
ti BSt•Tr.SLAB ______________________________-
REAR ELEVATION DAYLIGHT@
SCALE. co
W
�1�11 12
'w U)
L� z
Da OZ5 O
6:12
5'TRIM
s TRIM Z
-2ND FLOOR RATE
DD D' :;; O
------------- -------- -------------- - ---------- --------- ------- -- ------------------------------------- --
--- va W
_- 2ND FLOOR HDR HT._
________ _________ ________ ___
LL W
5.CORNER TRIM LLU LHEIII
VINYL
Li' i0 — SIDIN6 VINYL
b:12 SIDING
4:u 5'CORNER TRIM
. ________________________
_________IND FLOOR___ _____ _____________________
ars 6 V4-FIBER
pi
IST FLOOR PLATE HT. CEMENT TRIM __--- --------------------- _______ teWSIOM19:
___IST FLOOR HDR NT. - _-__
Nb:
------------ - ® b' B
® 4' 26
❑❑ - do D9 ®❑ 5-TRIM
.Q 5-CORNER TRIM
-5'CORNER TRIM
� designed by,
. D.2
FEdrawnby.
. •:.. � - dledced
.." STONE VINYL date: 2-24-06
�• - SIDING
IN
STO IN T BPLACED 1ST FLOOD _ _____
THI1 LS LOCATION
05MT.FLOOR ----------RATE H, ___-- Sheet:
'SIDE STOOP DETAIL O -------------- -- - - - -- ---- -- - - -- ----- -- - - ---
- SCALE,N.T$. 44
_ B Va'FIBER CEMENT ttPIGAL ExTERIOR BRICK MOLDINb Da a .
TRIM OVER Ix. LIGHT
PAINTED TO MATCH TRIM HIP END WIDTH '�
OPTIONAL 5TOOP STONE FACE DETAIL/---, FRONT ELEVATION@ va'
SCALE:1/B•=I'-D- SCALE:I/6'•1'-0- B
J
5HIN&LES
154 ROOFING FELT
1/2'056 15(32'SHEATHING VV*H'OLIPS
.I�'�lu n n n TRUSSES 024'O.L.
12 It II u II 12 EXTERIOR AIR FILM ft-Jl
b� 6112 Q6 BLOWN INSULATION R-44
SEALED POLY VAPOR BARRIER
1 LAYER 5/8'BLUR. Rv56 '
INTERIOR AIR FILM R-bb
2'T TOTAL R:VALE R=45.41
L2
6 27alw
T
2ND FLOOR PLATE NT.
-------- 2ND FLOOR HDR.HT.
________--- __ __-_--___ ______-_____-__-__
BEDROOM 05 GL. HALL MASTER BEDROOM
m
12 9/4'T. SUB FLOOR
4 GLUED NAILED
TRESSES O 1112
9 2'OL. ____ = I6-FLOOR TRUSSES O 142'O.G. IST FLOOR PLATE NT. .
=v�_�a
0 IL--s==e.v=d;
IST FLOOR HDR.HT.
2-2X10 FL BEAMS r 2-I 5/4'X9 1/2'FLJSH TERIOR AIR FILM R•.Il
2.-LEDGER Ibae=e===.dl VFRSAvLAM BEAMS I
2� GIRDER FLOOR BEAM v4 _______ 5 NG- Rv.61
TRUSS FLOOR BEAM?2 HOUSSIRAP R.
02
D3 i p------== i 1/2'- THING Rv 12
GARAGE HALL ;t=====___ FAMILY 2.6 s s QIb'Or-
GARAGE
51/2' TT INSULATION Rvl9 6
SEALED OILY VAPOR BARRIER '
4 MIL M. T-
I LAYER 'GMB. Rv.45
0 INTERIOR FILM Rv.68
9/4'Te6 SUB FLOOR TOTAL R-V UE R*22.19
GLUED NAILED
----- IST PLOOR
--- ------ ____ ... la•FLOOR TRUSSES O 192'OL. B5MT.FLOOR PLATE HT. 1V
_____ _____-__dr._______-__-__ _
SLAB
BSMT.FLOOR OR
IO'POURED LONG. 16 .... D.ID
_ fi
16'.8'GONG.FOO D.10 ====n =
10,
I 1 B'POURED GONG. - Ph
IED GONG.PT6 _
m _ = Db
_ ------ 5 I/2'GONG.SLAB
SLAB 4
Ifl -
EIGHT.9NIN6LEs
T- 154 ROOFING FELT
GRADE
1/2*OBS 15/52'SHEATHING YV'H'CLIPS
TRUSSES 924'OL. 12 I]
EXTERIOR A R.FILM R-Jl 6p Q6 b'POURED GONG WALL -
LONG.FTG.
BLOWN INSULATION R-44
SEALED POLY VAPOR BARRIER
LAYERSB'GY8 Rv56 2 BUILDING SECTION
INTERIOR AIR FILM R-b8 -46
SGALEL 1/8'-1'-0'
TOTAL R=VALUE R-45.41
Db
STAIR DETAIL D� m
SCALE.NOT TO SCALE
w
i 2ND FLOOR RATE HT.
-_ 2ND FLOOR HDR.HT. Z
I'b' O
J -
DS 7
LAUNDR IN BATH HALL •) m U
W
9/4'TdG SUB FL r/^'
6LUED t NAILED v
2ND FLOOR
16' 00 92' L. 1ST FLOOR PLATE HT.
J1 U
-_ IST FLAOR HDR.HT,
EXTERIOR AIR FILM R•.Il
SIDING R-bl _
SEALED HO/56NRAP R•.02 In .
1/2'SHEATMNG R-12 , m
2.6 STUD5 016'OL. �-,
5 1/2'BATT INSULATION R-w. DINING 9 ��I°I11 HALL
SEALED POLY VAPOR BARRIER C '
4 MIL MIN. , ravislons:
I LAYER V2'64"0. 2qR-45 a -
INTERIOR AIR FILM Rv.68 15'-42'
TOTAL R-VALUE R-22JB 9/4'Ta6 SUB FLOOR
GLUED t NAILED
1ST FL
___________ I ••FBLUE,i
O 2' 65MT.P_LO_OR PLATE FIT. li
__ _ __ __-__-__ _ - 65 OR HDR HT
' deslgnsd by:
92 n 4 92 �—�j
PA _
K Co
Ib•�42• sheet:
6'POURED GONE.WALL .
16'x8'LONE.FTG N
5 112'GONG.SLAB B`l'IT.SLAB
--
I BUILDING SECTION
I
SHINGLES .
15=ROOFING FELT
rd_ __R----14- U] LI
'OSB 15/97'SHEATHING W W CPS '
TRUSSES 024'O G.
[ n F
. 12 � // li n EXTERIOR AIR FILM R•.1'1
6 2 Qb BLOWN IN5UATION R=44
6.12 SEALED POLY VAPOR BARRIER
I 1 LAYER 5/6•GWB R=56
J INTERIOR AIR FILM R•.6b
TOTAL R-VALUE R=45.41
�... 2l
D3
27
D3 Ei -—--—-- 2ND FLOOR PLATE HT.
2NO FLOOR HDR HT.
BEDROOM a3 HALL MAIN BATH MASTER BATH
io
v=— Z&VO. :_4
bm12 .'Il D.103/4•Tt&50B FLOOR
GLUED t NAILED __—_ __—_.16'FLOOR TRUSSES O 190'OL. I6'FLOOR TRUSSES O 190'O.G. 16'FLOOR TRU55ES O A 2'O.G. -- -—-- IST FLOOR PLATE HT.t _ ---_-- 1ST FLOOR DR HT,2-1,4'X912 Fly __ _—VERSA•LAM BEAMS R AI FILM R=Jl
FLOOR BEAM-3 FLOOR BEAM 42 R=bl
�EVU3AP R•A2
.rb ING R•10D10 FOYER HALL KITGHEN ole•ot.TT INSUI_ATION R=I9 POLY VAPOR BARRIER, 'IN 12'G1'E!. R=4AIR FILM Reba
9/4•Tt6 SUB FLOOR AL R=VALUE R•72.I
BL1$D t NAILED _ ________ __ IS_T_ELOOR _
-_—__— __ T_FLOOR PLATE MT. li
14'FLOOR TRUSSES 0 193 O.C.
� K BSMT FLOOR HDR NT
2-]X10 DROPPED BEAM_ _5-2XIO DROPPED BEAMS .
FLOOR BEAM•2 FLOOR BEAM-1 -
y°.1 =
r
52 a
Db
10'POURED-GONG•WALL
Ito>.a'LONG.FOOTING Db
9 12'GONG.SLAB __—__—__ 135MT.SLAB
bRAJ7E SHINGLES
15-ROOFING FELT
12'05B 15/32'SHEATHING W'H'CLIPS
9'POURED GONG WALL p li n n `�A\ - TRUSSES AtR O.G.
'.b'GONG.FTG. 12 !� '' u o u EXTERIOR AIR FILM R•Jl -
3BUILDING SECTION BLOWI IN UL VAION R=44
.'ll o nb�l2 n tl n tl �.\ SEALED POLY VAPOR BARRIER
n n n o n 11
/1<' n o I u u n u � I LAYER 5/8'&WB. R•56
2 SCALE Va'•I'-0' 46 t%II n u u n n u °`.�
u II II n n 11 11 II .lt` INTERIOR AIR FILM R°6b
II II 11 tl 11 n II A��� TOTAL R•VALUE R•4541
27
�j' tl n n n tl o u un
DD
27
2ND FLOOR PLATE NT.
----- ]ND FLOOR HDR HT.
BEDROOM #2 GL. LAUNDRY MASTER BATH Q Z
�o O
612 3/4•TS SUB FLOOR f1r1
GLUED a NAILED Ll � -- --—__ _- 2ND_FLooR LLJ
o '^
a:o Ib'FLOOR TRUSSES O 190'O.G. _—_- _ IST FLOOR PLATE HT. �/,
IST FLOOR NDR HT.
2-15/4X912'DROPPED EXTERIOR FILM R•.Il
VERSA-LAM BEAM5 SIDING R=bl
FLOOR BEAM•I SEALED R=.02
lb4.
POWDER DINING KITCHEN 2.6 s R• 10 06'O.G. 7
51/2• ATT INSULATION R•I9 O c
POLY VAPOR BARRIER r
4 MI MIN.
1 L R 12'GW'B R•.45
I 1 IN MI
AIR FILM R°.6a
3/4'Tt&SUB FLOOR T TAL R°VALUE R•22.13 Mvwo=
li GLUED t NAILED
______ _—IST F]JXJR _ d� bmm 1>Y
l4'FLOOR TRISSE'0 BSMT.FLOOR PLATE HT. l
B5MT.FLOOR NDR HT
yy dealgled by.
_ - dr by.
7 i-
chtidlbd by.
52
Db 10'FLARED CONL.wALL date: 2-2444
Ib'r<6'CONG.FOOTING Db —
5 12'GONG.SUB -
---— sheet:
&RADE ///�]
. 6, NG.DNC W
POURED- ALL
.2 .
i�
6'K8'LOF76.
4 BUILDING SECTION 46
SCALES va'=r-o' Db
J
uj
p z =__ i v
I
3 i O m I -
v I
Q3
I
DD
�Z
IbH HI6 D
r r -- A
I
T-
a� °o�
—� U33
Z §Z rn
v I
I ti.._Y11;
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------
nrl•== 3�77
I' A nl W x
L-- - -j O-n I I A I.
3
I
I I;--
rn I n
� � I
I
� i I
rn - -----irl
I
I
z ® L----------------------,
I
I
Zf I ® -n
m I I =________� �- ;i I I P T I
oD I I O-n
rn lA�� A
O rn rn ®
j O
FTI
I D
O I I I I 1
® I I I I
I
II I I
I
------------
I c
I
I �
I
I y 3
� I
�I m p
� � 3
� I
3 - I
fll r�1
2 -
0
n j
�1— A -------------
m � � B
Z I I v I I T
z I I Z
I A F:-crrra
Ir rl1 ---'J - - --
1.
g o BSMT./ FIRST/ SECOND
00o
FLR. MECH. LAYOUTS
L J
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 3
1 owner, the variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood and the Planning
2 Commission agreed the placement of the house on the lot created a hardship.
3
4 Councilmember Faust asked if Chair Stromberg agreed the hardship was not created because of
5 health issues. Chair Stromberg replied Mrs. Peterson's health issues were not considered the
6 reason for the hardship.
7
8 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to adopt Resolution
9 04-029 approving a variance request for property addressed as 2601 —3151 Avenue NE.
10
11 Discussion:
12
13 Councilmember Stille indicated he generally agreed with the motion; however,he stated the
14 issue of the fence and the shed that was located on the property line concerned him. He noted he
15 understood it was difficult to place a condition on a variance,but he thought it would improve
16 the arrangement if there was more conformity to the Code.
17
18 Mr. Peterson stated the shed was 15 feet from the street. Councilmember Stille responded the
19 site plan indicated it was on the property line.
20
21 Councilmember Faust asked if this was a nonconforming use. He noted that probably should be
22 a question for staff. He added it would not weigh against granting the variance but should be
23 considered. Councilmember Stille responded he assumed it had been considered;however,he
24 could not confirm that it had been considered. He suggested conformance would be needed if
25 this was a nonconforming use.
26
27 Motion carried unanimously.
28
29 2. Resolution 04-030, re: Tires Plus, for Lot 8, Block 7, Mounds View Acres Second
30 Addition(property next to Twin City Federal on Silver Lake Road), conditional
31 use permit and an administrative subdivision request.
32 Planning Commission Chair Stromberg indicated on March 16, 2004, the Planning Commission
33 held a public hearing for a conditional use permit and an administrative subdivision request for a
34 Tires Plus Store on Silver Lake Road on property adjacent to Twin City Federal. He explained a
35 concept plan for the property was reviewed by the Commission at its February 17, 2004,
36 meeting. He noted the property was zoned commercial and the proposed use was a permitted
37 conditional use in a C district.
38
39 Chair Stromberg stated the applicant was currently located.next to the City liquor store on the
40 west side of Silver Lake Road; however, the existing building was being purchased and
41 demolished to accommodate the redevelopment of Apache Plaza.
42
43 Chair Stromberg indicated, following the public hearing held on March 16, 2004, the Planning
44 Commission recommended Council approve said requests with the following conditions:
45 1. Hours of operation would be 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and 7:00 a.m. to 5:00
46 p.m. on weekends.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 4
1 2. With the exception of two vehicles stored outdoors for 72 hours only,no outdoor storage
g
2 of vehicles was allowed.
3 3. An enclosure would be constructed around the dumpster.
4 4. A landscaping and lighting plan would be submitted for staff approval. He noted the
5 Commission asked for additional plantings to"soften the look,"as most of the current
6 trees would be lost during construction.
7 5. Review and approval by the City Attorney and City Engineer were required. He
8 indicated the Watershed District had been involved with solving some of the drainage
9 issues.
10 6. The landscaping plan must be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood.
11
12 Chair Stromberg noted the Commission had reviewed previous conditional use permits on
13 similar facilities in recent years before making its recommendations. He added the Tires Plus
14 representatives were open to the conditions.
15
16 Chair Stromberg indicated limiting truck access through the TCF parking lot was also discussed
17 as a condition; however, the Tires Plus manager felt he could self-regulate the access.
18 Discussion followed regarding planned access to the proposed Tires Plus location.
19
20 Councilmember Host stated he was concerned about the restriction of hours placed on Tires
21 Plus. He asked the Tires Plus representatives if this was a surprise to them. One of the
22 representatives responded it was a surprise,partly because Tires Plus had been a part of the
23 business community for so many years. He noted Tires Plus gave the Planning Commission its
24 hours of operation and the Planning Commission had extended the hours a small amount beyond
25 what Tires Plus had given them.
26
27 Councilmember Faust noted the City restricted hours of operation for Exhaust Pros in 1994;
28 therefore,this was not the first time it had happened. Councilmember Horst responded he
29 agreed; however, this was the first time he had been able to object to the restriction.
30
31 The Tires Plus representative indicated flexibility was sometimes needed when it was necessary
32 to complete work on a customer's car. Councilmember Horst agreed and discussed reasons why
33 he did not agree with restricting a business to certain hours, especially a business that had been a
34 "good neighbor." He added the City should at least expand the hours to what was reasonable for
35 this type of business.
36
37 Discussion followed regarding Tires Plus' current hours of operation and situations that could
38 demand Tires Plus remain open beyond the recommended hours.
39
40 Councilmember Horst stated he felt it did not hurt Council to be flexible; however, lack of
41 flexibility could hurt the business.
42
43 Chair Stromberg indicated the Planning Commission's intention was not to hurt Tires Plus'
44 business. Councilmember Horst responded the condition would hurt Tires Plus' business.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 5
1 Discussion followed regarding the need to protect homes located close to a business that worked
2 on vehicles.
3
4 Councilmember Faust stated he disagreed with Councilmember Horst and noted Tires Plus
5 would be closer to housing than it was before. He agreed adjustment would be needed if a
6 business competing with Tires Plus was located nearby and was allowed to stay open. He
7 indicated this issue needed to be handled with consistency and added he did not foresee the City
8 "shutting them down"if they stayed open late to take care of one of the City's residents. He
9 noted this type of business could be noisy in the summer and thought it would be nice to have
10 "peace and quiet"during some parts of the day.
11
12 Councilmember Horst stated he thought Rapid Oil Change was open until 10:00 p.m. or 11:00
13 p.m. He added he knew they were open late on weekends. He agreed the City needed to treat
14 businesses equally.
15
16 Councilmember Horst stated he did not want the first condition,which restricted hours of
17 operation, included in the resolution. He noted it would be hard to enforce all conditions if it
18 was decided one of them could be ignored and he wanted to make the conditional uses realistic.
19
20 Councilmember Faust stated he felt it would be easier to hold the business to a higher standard
21 that could be relaxed rather than a lesser standard that needed tightening. Councilmember Horst
22 responded he felt Tires Plus' track record showed they did not need"tightening up.
23
24 Councilmember Thuesen asked if legal issues would surface if the City granted longer hours for
25 Tires Plus, and Exhaust Pros, for example, did not have the same hours. He questioned if this
26 was something Council needed to consider or was each situation with conditional use permits
27 different.
28
29 City Manager Mornson responded every situation was different and one of the issues considered
30 was the location of the business. He explained the Chair of the Planning Commission would ask
31 the business what its current hours of operation were,which was done in this case. He noted
32 flexibility was already shown, as the Planning Commission expanded the.hours a small amount
33 beyond the cited current hours.
34
35 Mr. Mornson noted Councilmember Horst had asked what would happen if Wal-Mart offered
36 tire repair service, which Mr. Mornson felt was probable. He explained that was a separate
37 issue, as Wal-Mart was zoned PUD; therefore, the hours could be more or less restrictive,
38 depending on the PUD Agreement. He added, in the Tires Plus situation, the condition involving
39 hours of operation was to stop any possible disturbances in the neighborhood.
40
41 Councilmember Stille stated he was concerned about outside storage of vehicles. He indicated
42 he understood the condition was trying to provide some flexibility so Tires Plus would not be in
43 violation if they did have to leave a vehicle outside at night; however, it was his understanding
44 the outside storage of vehicles was "avoided at all costs."
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 6
1 The Tires Plus representative indicated outside storage of a vehicle would be a rare occurrence,
2 as there were eight bays within the Tires Plus building. He explained the Tires Plus' policy was
3 to bring vehicles into the shop every night for security and safety reasons. He noted sometimes
4 Tires Plus would give an estimate to repair an"undriveable"car and the owner would decide it
5 needed to be towed to a junkyard; however, situations like that were exceptional.
6
7 Councilmember Stille noted the conditional use permit was connected to the land and not the
8 business; therefore,he would rather"keep it tight,"with the option to consider modifying it at a
9 later date if Tires Plus found a need for an adjustment and chose to request it.
10
11 The Tires Plus representative asked Councilmember Stille if he agreed with the 72-hour
12 allowance. Councilmember Stille responded he did not agree; however, on the other hand, he
13 did not want to adversely affect Tires Plus' business.
14
15 The Tires Plus representative stated he could not give an opinion regarding whether or not a
16 vehicle would ever be outside; however, he felt flexibility from Council was needed. He
17 indicated Tires Plus' policy was to bring vehicles indoors at night. He added someone could
18 drop off their car and put the keys in the night drop and Tires Plus would not know it was there
19 until the next morning, for example.
20
21 Councilmember Stille noted it would be difficult for staff to monitor"what cars were where
22 when"if the 72-hour condition were allowed. The Tires Plus representative responded that Tires
23 Plus had been located in the City for many years and it had never received complaints regarding
24 this situation. He indicated he was flexible but also wished for a stipulation of flexibility within
25 the resolution that would cover the uncommon situations.
26
27 Mayor Hodson requested the resolution move forward as it was written,with the understanding
28 that Council was receptive to alterations if Tires Plus came forward indicating that market
29 conditions had changed.
30
31 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to adopt Resolution
32 04-030, approving a conditional use permit and an administrative subdivision request from Tires
33 Plus, for property described as Lot 8,Block 7, Mounds View Acres Second Addition(located
34 next to Twin City Federal on Silver Lake Road), with the stated conditions.
35
36 Discussion:
37
38 Councilmember Horst stated he wished to amend the conditional hours of operation to 7:00 a.m.
39 to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends, which would allow Tires
40 Plus flexibility if they needed to be open beyond the currently cited hours.
41
42 Councilmember Faust responded he did not accept Councilmember Horst's amendment as a
43 friendly amendment.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 7
1 Councilmember Thuesen indicated he felt Council should move forward with the resolution as it
2 was presented by the Planning Commission. He added he encouraged Tires Plus to come before
3 Council in the future if market conditions should change and it felt alterations were necessary.
4
5 Councilmember Faust stated Tires Plus had been a good corporate citizen and Council would
6 make sure they were able to compete. He noted Tires Plus was moving to a new location that
7 presented a different sort of circumstances and it might have a different impact. He added
8 Council would work with Tires Plus.
9
10 Councilmember Stille indicated he agreed with Councilmember Faust and, in addition, stated he
11 would like to exclude condition number 2 from the resolution,keeping in.mind"we are going to
12 keep it tight."
13
1.4 Councilmember Faust responded he also considered Councilmember Stille's amendment an
15 unfriendly amendment.
16
17 Mayor Hodson requested a motion to move forward with the resolution as stated. He noted two
18 friendly amendments had been made, one regarding hours and the other regarding stored
19 vehicles. He indicated he was in favor of leaving the resolution as it was brought forward, as
20 Council could consider any changes that were needed in the future.
21
22 Councilmember Horst stated he would remove his friendly amendment since he was outvoted.
23
24 Councilmember Stille stated he would also withdraw his friendly amendment.
25
26 Motion carried unanimously.
27
28 VI. GENERAL, POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
29 A. Todd Hubmer, WSB and Associates, Inc., to present the following:
30 1. Resolution 04-031, re: Consider bids for water plant.
31 Mayor Hodson noted Mr. Hubmer was not present due to a death in his family.
32
33 City Manager Mornson explained a total of four bids were received for this project on Thursday,
34 March 11, 2004. He noted WSB and Associates forwarded the bid tabulation, indicating the low
35 bidder was Magney Construction, Inc., Chanhassen, Minnesota, in the amount of$608,300. He
36 noted this bid was $100,000 below the estimate from last year.
37
38 Mr. Mornson stated WSB and Associates recommended Council consider these bids and award a
39 contract to Magney Construction, Inc., in the amount of$608,300.
40
41 Mr. Mornson explained two years ago Council ordered a Water and Sanitary Sewer Study of the
42 entire City to find out if there were any defects or problems within the system that would make it
43 unable to support the current growth and expected growth of the City's population. He noted
44 this project was a top priority issue.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 8
1 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to adopt Resolution
2 04-031 awarding a bid for the water treatment plant to Magney Construction, Inc., Chanhassen,
3 Minnesota, in the amount of$608,300.
4
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6
7 2. Resolution 04-032,re: Call hearing on 39`'Avenue NE street improvements.
8 3. Resolution 04-033,re: Declare cost to be assessed for 39th Avenue NE street
9 improvements.
10 4. Resolution 04-034, re: Call hearing on proposed assessments for 39'Avenue NE
11 street improvements.
12 City Manager Morrison explained these resolutions related to the 39`h Avenue Street and Utility
13 Improvement Project. He indicated public hearings for both the street and utility improvements
14 and the proposed assessments would be held at the April 27,2004, Council meeting should
15 Council approve the three resolutions.
16
17 Mr. Mornson indicated the total cost of the improvement would be approximately$2 million.
18 He noted the portion of the cost to be paid by the City was to be$775,000 and the portion of the
19 cost to be assessed against benefited property owners was to be $1.225 million.
20
21 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to adopt Resolution 04-
22 032 calling a public hearing for April 27, 2004, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00
23 p.m. regarding 39"Avenue street and utility improvements.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to adopt Resolution 04-
28 033 declaring the cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment.
29
30 Motion carried unanimously.
31
32 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to adopt Resolution
33 04-034 calling a hearing for April 27, 2004, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00 p.m.
34 regarding proposed assessment for 39`h Avenue street and utility improvements.
35
36 Motion carried unanimously.
37
38 13. Liquor Operations Manager Mike Larson to present the 2003 Liquor Operations Annual
39 Report.
40 Liquor Operations Manager Larson stated this was the year of redevelopment, noting Store#1
41 was closed. He added Stonehouse was also closed for a redevelopment project. He explained
42 the Operation employed a full-time Liquor Manager and each off-sale store had a Store
43 Manager, along with 15 part-time employees who complimented the full-time staff. He noted
44 the two Store Managers were present at the current meeting.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 9
1 Mr. Larson cited the Liquor Operations' Mission Statement: "Our goal is to control the sale of
2 beverage alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons while simultaneously generating revenue for
3 the community, in accordance with City, State and County liquor laws and ordinances."
4
5 Mr. Larson indicated the overall Liquor Operation sales for 2003 were $4,198,930,with an
6 unaudited net profit of$172,000, taking into consideration that all the debt service remaining in
7 the Liquor Operation was assumed by Store#2. He explained there was an overall decrease in
8 sales of$885,795 caused by the closing of Store#1 and the Stonehouse Bar and Grill. He
9 indicated$125,000 of the profits was transferred to the general fund and$28,000 was transferred
10 to capital equipment purchases.
11
12 Mr. Larson noted some of the 2003 activities of the Liquor Operations were as follows:
13 launched a web site for the liquor stores, renamed the liquor stores "St. Anthony Village Wine
14 and Spirits,"participated in the St. Anthony Chamber of Commerce Golf Tournament, increased
15 wine selection, held additional wine tasting events and increased beer selection with emphasis on
16 imported and specialty beers.
17
18 Mr. Larson indicated the City's Liquor Operation was the winner of the 2003 Lillie Newspaper's
19 Reader's Choice Awards for Best Beer Selection. He added it also successfully passed all of the
20 alcohol and tobacco compliance checks performed by the Police Department.
21
22 Mr. Larson provided a breakdown of Liquor-Operation sales by stores and products. He noted
23 the Liquor Operations had serviced approximately 206,000 customers during 2003.
24
25 Mr. Larson also presented an eight-year net profit history,noting the City had realized over$1.4
26 million in net profits over the last eight years. He explained those net profits had been
27 , transferred to the following City enterprises: general fund, capital equipment purchases, Central
28 Park projects, Skateboard Park project, the offset of LGA cuts and improvements to the Liquor
29 Operations.
30
31 Mr. Larson stated the following projects were planned for 2004: complete construction of off-
32 sale store at 2700 Highway 88, begin construction of new off-sale store at Silver Lake Village,
33 relocate current store to new location when construction is completed and expand the web site
34 capabilities. He noted the web site address was the following:
35
36 www.stanthonyyillagewineandspirits.com
37
38 Mr. Larson indicated the following items could be found on the web site: construction progress,
39 monthly specials, coupons, product list,new products, list of events, sign-up for Wine Club,
40 party planning and an on-line customer survey.
41
42 Mr. Larson presented a drawing of proposed Store 41 and indicated the following features would
43 be available: remodeled cooler; expanded cold and warm beer selection; expanded wine
44 selection; clean, bright and smoke-free environment; a product tasting area; increased parking.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
_March 23, 2004
Page 10
1 Mr. Larson noted the Liquor Operations' project was one week ahead of schedule and on budget.
2 He added the City Council and Chamber of Commerce Ribbon Cutting Ceremony would be
3 scheduled between May 17 and June 1, 2004; and the Public Grand Opening Celebration would
4 be scheduled.for June 21 through June 26, 2004.
5
6 Mr. Larson provided the following time line for the new store: cooler installation began on
7 Monday, March 22, which was one week ahead of schedule; exterior finishes to be completed on
8 April 6; windows, interior walls,plumbing and floor tile to be completed on April 26;blacktop
9 parking lot on May 15.
10
11 Mr. Larson stated he and the Store Managers wished to thank all the departments within the
12 City, especially the Public Works Department, for assisting the Liquor Operations in many ways.
13
14 Councilmember Faust stated he understood the Wine and Grocery Bill was currently on the
15 inactive list at the Legislature, which was important to the community because it would
16 potentially allow wine to be sold by someone under the age of 21. He added City control would
17 also help keep the City"in the black"with liquor sales, which helped pay property taxes. He
18 indicated the City had support from the School Board and noted it was good public policy from
19 both a children's safety and a financial point of view.
20
21 Councilmember Faust thanked Mr. Larson for"a good job,"both for the City and at the
22 Legislature.
23
24 Mayor Hodson also thanked Mr. Larson and the Store Managers for the excellent work they had
25 done. He noted Mr. Larson had begun working with the City's Liquor Operations in 1996, at
26 which time it realized a net profit of approximately$20,000. He indicated the net profitability
27 had jumped to more than$300,000 in 2002.
28
29 Mr. Larson stated he had been"blessed with a great team"and was very grateful for the Store
30 Managers and part-time employees.
31
32 C. Public Works Director Jay Hartman to present the 2003 Public Works Annual Report.
33 Public Works Director Hartman stated he wished to give a brief overview of the Public Works
34 Department and highlight some of the accomplishments from calendar year 2003 and discuss
35 proposed projects for 2004.
36
37 Mr. Hartman indicated the Public Works Department employed 14 full-time personnel; 12 were
38 maintenance personnel and 2 were management. He added the Department typically hired four
39 to five seasonal personnel who assisted the Parks Department and Street Department with their
40 maintenance responsibilities.
41
42 Mr. Hartman explained the Public Works Department was responsible for the maintenance and
43 repair of the City's infrastructure and was divided into four departments: Vehicle Maintenance,
44 Street, Parks and Water/Sewer Utility. He cited the responsibilities and goals of each
45 department.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 11
1 Mr. Hartman stated,beginning in 1999, the City-Wide Flood Mitigation Program Initiative was
2 incorporated with the Street Reconstruction Program and, to date, about 95% of the City-wide
3 flood improvements had been completed, with street improvement projects continuing on a
4 yearly basis. He explained the final component to complete the flood mitigation was to
5 construct a storm water retention pond at the corner of Silver Lane and Shamrock Drive, which
6 was to be completed during the summer of 2004. He added,based on the current schedule, all
7 bituminous roadways west of Silver Lake Road would be completed by 2008 and, at that point,
8 the City would be in a position to address the reconstruction of the remaining concrete segments
9 throughout the City,which made up approximately 42% of the City's roadway infrastructure.
10
11 Mr. Hartman indicated the 2004 street utility reconstruction would consist of the following:
12 Hilldale Avenue between Silver Lake Road and Belden Drive, Belden Drive between 33`d
13 Avenue and 32nd Avenue, 32nd Avenue between Belden Drive and Silver Lake Road, and
14 Townview Avenue between Wilson Street and Silver Lake Road.
15
16 Mr. Hartman noted the Central Park construction project was completed and the Central Park
17 pavilion and athletic field would be ready for use in the spring of 2004, as well as the small
18 shelter constructed at Silver Point Park.
19
20 Mr. Hartman stated the Water/Sewer Department provided residents with an annual Consumer
21 Confidence Report (CCR),which would be included in the April newsletter.
22
23 Mr. Hartman indicated the capital improvement projects proposed for 2004 were as follows:
24 purchase of Public Works maintenance equipment scheduled for 2004, chemical equipment
25 upgrades for water filtration and GAC plant, filtration plant pump control upgrades, completion
26 of the Well-Head Protection Plan, annual 2004 street reconstruction, upgrade of City street signs,
27 and a community electronic sign in front of City Hall and a City entrance ground sign at the
28 north end of the City.
29
30 Mr. Hartman displayed a drawing of the new Public Works facility, noting construction was far
31 ahead of schedule. He indicated the move-in date was anticipated to be sometime between the
32 middle of April to early May. He stated he"could not have asked for a better team to make this
33 happen." He thanked those who helped make this project a success, noting it could not have
34 been accomplished without the 20-member task force,the team of Oertel Architects/Kraus-
35 Anderson, and Council. He added an open house would be planned and residents should look
36 for the flyer in an upcoming newsletter.
37
38 Mr. Hartman noted the following 2004 upcoming events: Annual Spring Clean-Up Day on May
39 1, 2004; Public Works Facility Grand Opening on June 24, 2004, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.;
40 Central Park Dedication anticipated for June of 2004; Village Fest in August of 2004.
41
42 Mr. Hartman stated 2003 was a very productive year for the Public Works Department. He
43 noted it was able to attain the goals of each department and provide the needed services to the
44 City's residents. He indicated the success of the Department was due to the knowledge and
45 dedication of its employees,who made the Village of St. Anthony a great place to live. He
46 added it always had been and would be the mission of the Public Works Department to be
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 12
1 proactive in providing services that met or exceeded the service level provided by other public
2 works agencies.
3
4 Councilmember Thuesen asked if Mr. Hartman had any information regarding a gate system that
5 could be placed on the snowplows,noting the gate system could be put down to prevent pushing
6 snow into driveways. He questioned if Mr. Hartman could comment on how this would affect
7 the time factor of removing snow and the cost. Mr. Hartman responded he had been asking
8 questions regarding the gate system and, at this point, did not understand how it worked. He
9 added he would have better answers to Councilmember Thuesen's questions when he was able to
10 find information about the gate system.
11
12 Councilmember Thuesen asked if any cities within the metropolitan area used the system. Mr.
13 Hartman responded he was not aware of any cities that used such a system.
14
15 Councilmember Thuesen asked if the Department would provide opportunity for chipping of
16 branches, etc., this spring. Mr. Hartman responded curbside chipping would be provided in the
17 spring and, if a resident missed the curbside chipping,he/she could bring the materials to the
18 new Public Works facility,where they would be handled at that time.
19
20 Councilmember Faust noted he encouraged residents who liked to keep their trees trimmed to
21 use the curbside chipping offered by the Public Works Department. He added he also
22 appreciated the street sweepers, who did an excellent job keeping the City clean.
23
24 Councilmember Faust asked how the new park at Silver Lake Village would affect the
25 Department's staffing. Mr. Hartman responded he would be meeting with the design team in
26 about two weeks regarding this issue. He added one of the items needing consideration was
27 whether maintenance would be split with the property owners in the area or if the City would
28 take responsibility and charge back to the affected residents. He noted decisions would be made
29 after further discussion had taken place.
30
31 Councilmember Faust asked Mr. Hartman to thank his department for its hard work, which"kept
32 the City working really well."
33
34 Mayor Hodson thanked Mr. Hartman and noted he had received comments of appreciation from
35 residents regarding the Public Works Department.
36
37 VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
38 City Manager Mornson reported the following:
39 He cited the following items regarding the Silver Lake Village project: 1) excellent
40 turnout for the Saturday Bulldozer Bash; 2) meeting with property owners on March 23,
41 2004, regarding 391h Avenue NE improvements and assessments, with another meeting
42 scheduled to take place in the middle of April; 3) three to four meetings held per week
43 with the developer regarding the project; 4) developer met with Fire Department staff
44 regarding fire code issues.
45 Mr. Mornson explained the Silver Lake Village project would be bid out in two phases,
46 with the bid opening on the first phase scheduled for April 22, 2004, and consideration of
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 13
1 bids and a public hearing scheduled for the April 27, 2004, City Council meeting. He
2 indicated work would begin on May 16, 2004, which would include sanitary sewer,
3 watermain and storm sewer from Silver Lake Road west to the existing 39`h Avenue. He
4 added access from 39th Avenue to Video Stardom and Freedom Gas Station was
5 anticipated to remain open with some disturbances.
6 ° Mr. Mornson stated the second-phase bid opening was scheduled for sometime around
7 July 20, 2004, and would include the following: watermain, sanitary sewer and storm
8 sewer from Stinson Boulevard to Phase I connections; reconstruction of existing 39'
9 Avenue from Stinson Boulevard to the connection with the new 39`h Avenue;
10 construction of new 39`'Avenue from Silver Lake Road to the existing 39'Avenue,
11 which would be completed by September 1, 2004. He noted demolition was scheduled to
12 begin around April 7, 2004, and would take approximately five weeks to complete.
13 Sue Hall would return from family leave on April 12, 2004.
14 o City Clerk Kroeplin's last day with the City would be April 30, 2004. He stated an
15 interview panel for the City Clerk position had been formed and interviews would occur
16 the following week.
17 The cooler for the liquor store was currently being installed. He indicated the Amcon
18 project was still on a schedule to open in mid to late May.
19 ° There were no changes to the Public Works schedule and construction of the fire station
20 would begin around mid-April.
21 o Meeting to review 2004 goals was scheduled for April 5, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. and a joint
22 meeting with the School Board was scheduled for 6:00 p.m. the same evening.
23 Joint meeting with Park Commission scheduled for April 12, 2004, at 5:30 p.m.
24 Joint meeting with Planning Commission scheduled for April 20, 2004, at 5:30 p.m.
25 Regular Council meetings scheduled for April 13, 2004, and April 27, 2004.
26 City-wide Cleanup Day scheduled for May 1, 2004, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
27
28 _ Councilmember Horst stated he had no report.
29
30 Councilmember Stille stated he had no report.
31
32 Councilmember Thuesen stated he had no report.
33
34 Councilmember Faust noted he had talked with an individual who was starting a new group
35 called the St. Anthony Tennis Association,which consisted of community volunteers whose
36 mission was to support tennis and enhance tennis at all levels. He explained it was run by
37 Community Services and residents should call (612) 706-1163 for further information. He
38 indicated the program would be"kicked off'on May 8,2004, at 10:00 a.m. with music,
39 information and the opportunity to obtain lessons. He added this was another way for the City's
40 children, as well as all citizens, to stay involved. He provided Council with further written
41 information regarding the Association.
42
43 Councilmember Faust reminded residents that Cleanup Day was scheduled for May 1, 2004, and
44 indicated it was very important to utilize the opportunity Cleanup Day provided. He encouraged
45 residents to collect some of the trash that was exposing itself from the winter to "get a head start
46 on how the community looks."
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
Page 14
1 Councilmember Faust stated he must add a sad note to the meeting, as a long-term resident of
2 the City,Dr. Bill Carr,passed away on March 19. He noted Dr. Carr had served as the City's
3 medical officer for 40 years and Councilmember Faust offered heartfelt condolences to Dr.
4 Karr's family. He added everyone who knew Dr. Carr said he was a"prince of a fellow."
5
6 Councilmember Thuesen indicated he was at the funeral service and there was standing room
7 only in all parts of the church, as Dr. Carr had touched many people's lives.
8
9 Mayor Hodson noted the Bulldozer Bash turned out to be an"amazing event." He indicated
10 approximately 4,000 to 6,000 people attended, with residents from other communities also
11 participating. He thanked those responsible for hosting and sponsoring the event, along with the
12 groups and departments that provided entertainment, refreshments and logistics. He also listed
13 the dignitaries in attendance and thanked all who attended. He added, in addition,between
14 $8,000 and $10,000 had been earned at a silent auction for scholarships and noted most of the
15 local television stations provided coverage of the event.
16
17 VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM.
18
19 Mayor Hodson stated he continued to ask area mayors about the inclusion of a community forum
20 item on their City Council agendas. He noted many communities did not have an open forum, as
21 the Council meetings were strictly for Council business. He encouraged residents to come
22 forward and take advantage of the opportunity to address the community and Council during this
23 time, as Council and staff wished to keep communications open with City residents. He added
24 further information regarding the City's Council meetings could be located at the library or on
25 the City's website.
26
27 No one came forward to address Council.
28
29 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
30 None.
31
32 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
33 None.
34
35 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
36 Mayor Hodson adjourned the meeting at 8:28 p.m.
37
38
39 Respectfully submitted,
40
41
42 Marjorie R. Jenkins
43 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
44
45
46 Mayor