HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 11281989 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
- 101509
Box:21
Folder: CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1989
Document: CC MINUTES 11281989
• 1
1 CITY OF ST. ATITHOTTY
2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
3
4 NOVEMBER 281 19^09
5
6
7 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
0
9 The meeting was called to order at 7 : 36 p.m. by Mayor Pro
10 Tem Ranallo, who led the Pledge of Allegiance .
11
12
13 ROLL CALL
14
15 Present : Enrooth : Makowske , Marks : Ranallo
16 rbsent : Mayor Sundland
17 Also Present : Thomas Burt : City Manager
18 Bill Soth . City Attorney
19 Ted Brownell , Planning Commissioner
20
21 Mavor Pro Tem Ranallo announced to those riatbar. ed for the
22 public hearing that , although notice was published in the
23 November 20th edition of the Minneapolis Star and Tribune :
• 24 it was erroneously published in the Variety section rather
25 than in the Communitv section . The notice therefore has
26 been republished and the formal hearing will be held as hart
27 of the December 12th Citv Council meeting. He invited those
28 present to participate in an informal discussion of the
29 issues ; stating that their comments would be duly recorded
30 for the December 12th meeting in the event they Twere unable
31 to attend that meeting .
32
33
34 APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 14 . 1.989 COUNCIL MINUTES
35
36 Motion by Marks , seconded by Makowske : to approve the
37 minutes of the November 14 , 1989 City Council minutes with
38 the following corrections :
39
40 Page 1 ; line 16 : Add "non Hickerson : Police Chief . "
41
42 Page 2 : line 39 : Add "arid liquor operations" after
43 "state_m..ents . "
44-
J-5
445 Page 3 , lines 22 through 24 : Delete the sentence "She
46 noted . . . on the agenda . " Replace with:
47 "She had intended to bring up a discussion
48 of the St . Anthonv bus service but the
• 49 subject was not on the agenda . "
50
2
•
1 Pace 6 , line 380 : Chanae "x:athlvn Sevich" to "Kathlyne
2 Sevi_ck .
3
d_ Page 6 , line 44 ; page 6 , line 47; page 7 .. line 1 ; page 7 ,
5 line 5; page 7 , line 14 ; page 7 , line 21 , page 7 : line 31 :
6 Chance "Sevich" to "Sevi.ck . "
7
0 Page 7 , line 23 : Change "previously attacked" to
9 "subseUuently startled . "
10
11 Page 7 , line 41 ; page 8 , line 12 : Change "Dickerson" to
12 "Hickerson . "
13
14 Page 7 ; line 49 : Change "Koanismark" to "Koenigsmark . "
15
16 t.,�t; on carried unanimously.
17
za
19 LIC FNSES/PERMITS/PETITIONS
20
^1 Motion by Marks : seconded by F,nrooth , to approve the
22 licenses for the following contractors :
23
• 24 Contractors :
25 Preferred Homes by Stanley; St . Paul MTJ
26 General Sprinkler Corp. : St . Paul . MN
27 FFH Co. . Burnsville . MN
28
29 Heatina :
30 J . K. Heating Co . , St . Paul , MN
31
32 Motion carried unanimously.
'A1
34
35 CLAIMS
36
37 Motion by Mlarks , seconded by Makowske , to approve payment of
38 the verified claims .
39
40 ?lotion carried unanimously .
Al
42 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Enrooth , to approve
43 quarterly payment of $15, 782 . 25 to the League of Minnesota
44 Cities Insurance Trust .
45
46 Motion carried unanimously.
47
48 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth, to approve _payment. of
49 $1 , 958 . 94 to Brad Ragan, Inc . for tires .
• 50
3
•
1 Motion carried unanimously.
2 r
3 Motion by Enrooth , seconded by Makowske ; to approve payment
d_ of $19 , 627 . 86 to Metropolitan taste Control Commission for
5 December sewer service charges .
6
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8
9 Motion by Marks : seconded by Ranallo . to approve payment of
10 $150, 000 to Ramsey County in reimbursement of funds received
11 for temporary filtration plant .
12
13 Motion carried unanimousl._v.
14
15
16 RRPORTS
17
10" PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVE14BER 21 , 1989
19
20 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo introduced Commissioner Ted Brownell ,
21 representing the Planning Commission . Commissioner Brownell.
22 announced that Commissioner Steve London had resigned the
23 Planning Commission, and that Chairman Madden had expressed ,
• 24 on behalf of the entire Commission , his thanks for London ' s
25 years of service and his wishes for London ' s success in his
26 future endeavors .
27
28 Commissioner Brownell reported that the Planning Commission
29 had received two sign variance requests , the first of which
30 was by Stan Carlson: owner of Rosie ' s Restaurant located at.
'Al 2905 Kenzie Terrace . Stan Carlson of R.osie ' s Restaurant and
32 Michael McKee of McKee Sign Service were present. The
33 request was for a second sign approximately 30 square feet
34 in size which would be mounted on the parapet on the top of
35 the roof of the building. This second sign would he
36 identical to the first sign allowed by the sign ordinance .
37
38 Brownell indicated that the Planning Commission recommended
39 approval of the request , noting that the two signs would
40 total 60 square feet , well under the 110 square feet allowed
41 by the sign ordinance; that the request met the three
42 requirements of the Minnesota statutes; that the location is
43 unique because the building fronts on two thoroughfares and
44 because the building is situated at an angle on the
45 property; and that no one spoke against the variance
46 request .
47
48 The Planning Commission also recommended that all other sign
49 variances granted to this property he cancelled upon the
•
50 authorization of the pending request ; that the variance
d
•
1 approval be valid for a period of 90 days ; and that approval
2 of the pending request not be transferable to future tenants
3 of that property .
A
5 Council Member Marks asked that his memory be refreshed
6 regarding sign variance approvals in the past year and a
7 half for this property. Commissioner Brownell replied that ,
8 although variance requests for a roof sign and a pylon sign
9 had been approved for the property ' s previous owner, those
10 signs and all other signage has been removed from the
11 property with the exception of the Rosie ' s Restaurant
12 temporary sign. Commissioner Brownell explained that the
13 recommendation of the Planning Commission encompasses the
14 cancellation of previous sign variance approvals for the
15 restaurant property.
16
17 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks , to approve the
18 variance request by Rosie ' s Restaurant in accordance with
9.9 the recommendations of the Planning Commission.
20
21 Motion carried unanimously.
22
23 Commissioner Brownell introduced the second sign variance
24 request by LaIdel Financial Group, Inc . LaNel had asked that
25 they be permitted to install directional signs at Autumn
26 Woods larger than allowed by ordinance . Brownell reported
27 that the Planning Commission voted to table the request
28 pending presentation of additional information regarding the
29 layout and description of each directional sign and e.
30 diagram of the monument sign to be placed at the main_ .
31 entrance . Paul Brewer of LaNel had agreed to provide such
32 information at the December 1989 Planning Commission
33 meeting. No action required by City Council regarding this
34 request .
35
36
37 TAXATION/REFUSE
38
39 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo introduced City Manager Tom Burt and
40 asked him to explain the pending taxation issue , and invited
41_ questions from the public .
42
43 City Manager Burt explained that the state legislature voted
44 to shift local government aid, which is comprised of state
45 income tax and sales tax. He stated that St . Anthony has
46 been dependent upon local government aid to the extent of
47 approximately $228 , 000 per year in the past, which is not
48 large compared to other communities . Local government aid
49 will now be shifted to the school districts in anticipation
• 50 that the State will fully fund school districts in the
• 5
I future . Tares will co un $19 on an average-priced
2 St . Anthony home ($58 . 000) : resulting in a 1990 property tax
3 liability of $180 versus $161 . Ta _es would have decreased
4 $24 , to $137 , had the local government aid not been shifted
5 to school districts . in order to recover the money lost in
6 local government aid and to cover the cost of living
7 increases : St . Anthony proposes a tax increase of 11 . 8%: 3%
8 of which is to cover `he cost of living; which is currently
9 estimated to be 4-1/2'x .
10
11 Norman Lucas of 2000 32nd Avenue Northeast asked for
12 clarification of the 11 . 89a, property tax increase described
13 in the public notice . City Manager Burt explained that the
14 total tax bill is split between the school district , the
15 county, the c t.v . a:,d =pecial districts (suf,h as waters'-e,�
16 and mosquito control ' The Citv receives about 17 to 20
17 cents of each tax dollar , the school di-strict 60 cents : and
18 the county receives the remainder . An increase of 11 . 8% is
1.q to be imposed by the "? tv only on the 17 e7ents of every
20 dollar that the City currently receives . Ma_or Pro Tena
21 Ranallo noted that each taxing entity (i . e . , the county and
22 the school district ) holds its own public hearing. City
• 23 Manager Burt indicated that the 1990 school district budget
24 is decreasing by $1 . 8 : pillion and that the 1990 county
25 budget will increase .
26
27 Jerry Sheen : owner of St . Anthony Lanes , expressed his
28 concern regarding the impact on business owners of the net
29 total increase in tax--=s by all government branches . City
30 Manager Burt explained that. the City ' s percentage increase-
31 applies equally to all property: whether comm&rcial or
32 private . Mayor Pro Tim Ranallo reminded the citizens that
33 the Council and Cit_v '-'onager are only able to answer
34 Questions regarding the City' s budget .
35
36 Norman Lucas raised the issue of recycling . Mayor Pro T=m
37 Ranallo stated that the City would provide one free
38 recycling container to each household , and that they would
39 be available at City -all December 1 and 2 . Each bin costs
40 $5. 20 , and Hennepin County has covered $5 of the cost and
41 the City is covering the other 20 cents . TTegotiations are
42 underway to obtain similar financing from Ramsey County .
43 Additional bins will be available for purchase after the
44 first of the new year . Council Member Enrooth explained
45 that papers, glass , and cans can be sorted into grocery bags
46 and then all three items can be placed in the one recycling
47 bin.
• 48
49 Norman Lucas pointed out that Waste Management plans to
50 charge $2 . 50 per month to pick up recycling. Mayor Pro Tem
1 Ranallo indicated that the Citv had r=-.—ived many calls
2 regarding Waste Management ' s rate sche ule . Council Member
3 Enrooth stated that the City Council became aware of waste
4 Management ' s charge for recycling pic',�-,.n at the same time
5 that Waste Management sent notice to its customers . He
6 pointed out that other haulers service the St . Anthony area
7 at competitive rates and do not charge to pick up recycling .
8
9 Norman Lucas then asked what provision `-gad b-en 7-ade for
10 disposal of leaves and grass clippings . Counr_il ]-Tember
11 Enrooth responded that at the present tame several compost
12 centers operate in the metropolitan area, and that the
13 closest to St . Anthony is located at La%e Johanna . He noted
14 that as landfill space becomes more scarce haulers are
15 charged higher O'u.,1Di ng rates ; = n,l th?t new
16 County trash incinerator is not. intend_ to l,i.irn "eaves and
a
17 grss Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo advised `=,e citi?.ens that the
18 Citv will devise a plan for disposal of leaves and crass
19 before spring. He inri7Cated that the City will cnritinu? t0
20 keep its salvage/recyclin? v?rd open ac long as the need is
21 apparent . _ -
22
• 23
24 CI'T'Y COUNCIL
25
26 Council Member MakowsKe reported that sta attended the
27 Ramsey County League of Local Governments Legislative
28 Committee meetin.a and was asked to 4.ra" a resolution
29 regarding the DzJ E drug program for p.r=sentation to the
30 state legislature . She also attended `',e school com-munity
31 forum, and made materials a-ailable to _interested Council
32 members .
33
34 Council Member Enrooth reported that be 47i11 attend a
35 meeting dealing with youth in the Apache area and will
36 follow up with information to the Council .
37
38 Council Member Marks noted that he al.sc had received many
39 calls regarding Waste Management ' s rat- schedule . He
40 expressed regret that, although the City thought they had
41 designed a system to encourage recycling, Waste Management ' s
42 response was counterproductive .
43 Council Member Marks reported that he had met with
44 representatives of the school district regarding disorderly
45 and illegal behavior by youths in the =.pache area .
46
47 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo reported that he visited with Mayor
48 Sundland and was encouraged by his recovery progress . ilayor
• 49 Sundland expressed his gratitude to the City Council. for
50 filling in for him in his absence .
• 7
1 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo stated that he and City
2 Manager Burt have arranged a meeting with some members of
3 the school board to re-establish the good relationship
g instituted by Mayor Sundland . A major_ topic of discussion
5 will be the taxation issue .
6 Mayor Pro Te_. Ranallo reported that the Village
7 Fest meeting will be held December 11 , and that at that time
8 he will present by-laws provided hi.rn by Bill Soth . Ruction
9 of the Village Fest board of directors will be held it
10 January 1990 .
11
12
13 DEPARTMENTS AND COMMITTEES
14_
15 Hance n LeVahn , Ltd . , re : r_stters conducted at the e-:nen, n
16 Countv District Court up to and including November 1 , 1989 .
17 The rer)ort -as filed . Council Member Marks remarked t;-,at
18 the number of complaints filed by peace officers seems to be
19 increasing . He also noted that , of those arrested for
20 drunken behavior, the blood alcohol contents reported °.:ere
21 extremely high in ;many cases .
22 r
• 23
24 NEW BUSINESS
25
26 BARKING DOG ON CROFT DRIVE
27
28 Mavor Pro Te_n Ranallo introduced a non-agenda item regarding
29 a barking dog complaint . Phil Oswald of 3204 Croft Drive
30 spoke in his own defense regarding complaints of. Bernhard
31 Preussner, 3209 Skycroft Drive, alleging that his dog is a
32 nuisance .
33
34 Mr . Oswald stated that while he was in the process of
35 building an outdoor kennel for their dog his dog was left
35 outside and did bark , but that he and his wife were not
37 aware that the dog was barking because they were at work.
38 Mr . Oswald related that he had arrived home from work one
39 day to discover Mr . Preussner yelling at the dog to be
40 quiet . Mr . Preussner yelled at Mr. Oswald on two occasions
41 on that same day regarding the dog, swore at him once, and
42 threatened to silence the dog with a shotgun once.
43
4.4 Mr . Oswald stated that his dog has been kept in the garage
45 since the incident with the exception of one day when the
46 door between the garage and the outside kennel was
47 inadvertently left open . On that day the dog barked, I-fr .
48 Preussner complained to the police, and Mr. Oswald was sent
is
49 an official notice as a result . Mr . Oswald stated that Mr .
50 Preussner also called the police on Saturday when a stray
• 8
1 dog roaming the neighborhood agitated the neighborhood dogs .
3 74r . Oswald stated that St . Anthony is a friendly, family
d_ neighborhood where many people have dogs , and that a dog is
5 not a nuisance unless it barks all day long and all the
6 time . He pointed out that theirs is not the only
7 neighborhood dog that barks and that they are being unfairly
8 singled out by Mr . Preussner. Mr . Oswald expressed his
9 embarrassment at being called on by the police at a time
10 when they happened to have company. Mr. Oswald stated that
11 if Mr . Preussner had tried to talk to him civilly they might
12 have come to terms regarding the dog. He alleged that Mr .
13 Preussner behaves is a threatening manner and and will not
ld_ communicate reasonably .
15
16 74r . Oswald told the Council that Mr . Preussner. had
17 distributed flyers to the neighborhood but did not deliv_r
18 one to them. He stated that Mr . Preussner ' s behavior
19 frightens them and makes Mr . OswaJ_d angry . He fears that
20 ;fir . Pr:ussner will shoot their dog or shoot randomly at
21 their house . Mr. Oswald asked for assurances from Mr .
22 Preussner that he will not point a shotgun in their
• 23 direction, that he will stop calling the police on the
24 Oswalds whenever he hears a dog barking; and that he will
25 Dave the Oswalds alone .
6
27 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo then invited Mr . Preussner to address
28 the Council , but cautioned the parties that the City Council
29 is not a judicial body and could not entertain lengthy
30 arguments in an attempt to settle the issue at the meeting.
31 He informed the parties that ; if they were unable to settle
32 the issue between themselves , the City Manager would assist
33 them at a later date or that mediation might be necessary .
34
35 Mr . Preussner asked Mr . Oswald whether his dog is licensed,
36 and Mr . Oswald replied that it is . Mr . Preussner informed
37 the Council that he had examined the record of dogs licensed
38 and failed to discover Mr. Oswald ' s dog on the list .
39
A-0 Mr . Preussner then stated that only about 100 dogs are
41 licensed in the City, that the City takes in roughly $450
42 per year in dog licenses , but that the dogcatcher costs the
43 City $2, 500 per year. He expressed the opinion that it is
44 unfair to the residents of St . Anthony who do not own dogs
45 to bear the majority of the cost of the dogcatcher. Mr.
46 Oswald informed the Council. that since the last meeting at
47 which he appeared he has received 17 calls regarding the dog
48 -issue , that one of the callers called him a name although
• 49 the other 16 were supportive , and that only one caller from
50 Rankin Road identified himself .
2
3 RESTDENT REQUEST FOR MORE THAN TWO DOGS TTJ HTS HOME AT 3-et-19
4 36th AVENUE NORTHEAST
6 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo called on Richard Bartel and Duane
7 Hodges to address the City Council . Mr . Bartel stated that
8 he and Mr . Hodges are new residents of St . Anthony and wish
q to obtain a variance to have three dogs at their property.
10 The dogs are a golden retriever he has owned for five a and
11 a half years , a spaniel mix he has owned for three years,
12 and a labrador puppy. The dogs were described as indoor
13 dogs who are never outside without supervision . Mr.
14 Bartels stated that the dogs ' barking is controlled and that
15 their waste is picked up regularly. Fe offered to t.h,-
1 ^0 Council letters from two of hi-s previous neighbors
17 expressing their satisfaction with Mr . Bartels ' s responsible
1 ^0 dog ownership.
19
`0
4 City Manager Burt noted that one of the nejohbors who
21 orignally registered a negative comment wit� the City
22 regarding the variance has changed their opinion to a
23 positive one .
25 Council Member Enrooth asked for clarification of the dog
26 ordinance. Citv Attorney Bill Soth stated that the request.
27 is not actuallv a variance but that it is an approval . He
28 further stated that , although the ordinance does not give
29 auidelines for approval , the Council should consider the
30 dogs ' home and neighborhood environment before giving its
31 approval . Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo quoted from the ordinance;
32 Section 1015-05, "Keeping of Certain Animals : " for the
33 benefit of the Council Members and the citizens . The
34 ordinance includes a clause whereby the Council is entitled
35 to obtain a report from a public health officer prior to
36 giving its approval . Council Member Enrooth asked whether
37 approval could be withdrawn once it was given , and Mr . Soth
38 replied affirmatively.
39
4-0 Council Member Makowske asked Mr . Bartel to describe the
41 sizes of the dogs in question . Mr . Bartels replied that the
4-2 golden retriever is approximately 85 pounds : the spaniel mix
43 is approximately 80 pounds , and the labrador is a puppy but
A-4 might reach 80 or 85 pounds in size . Council Member Marks
45 asked whether the breeds of dogs owned by Bartel and Hodges
46 were fairly tame dogs . Mr . Bartel replied that the dogs are
47 not guard or attack dogs .
48
49 Council Member Makowske stated that one of the neighbors who
50 disapproved of three dogs in the home had expressed the
• 10
1 concern that three dogs in the house might result in
2 deterioration of the real estate . Mr . Hodges objected to
3 that conclusion, and stated that their previous home in
4 St . Paul was maintained well and sold for a profit and that
5 they intend to maintain and improve their property in
6 St . Anthony. Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo reminded the Council.
7 that they have the right to a report by a public health
8 officer . Council Member Enrooth added that , should a
9 problem develop, approval could be withdrawn .
10
11 Council Member Makowske asked at what time the neighbors '
12 comments were solicited, and was informed that the comments
13 were received near the end of October, shortly after Hodges
14 and Bartel moved in. Mr . Hodges stated that two of their
15 neighbors expressly welcomed them and their dogs to the
16 neighborhood when they -roved in . He commented that he and
17 Mr. Bartel investigated the issue with the City immediately
18 upon moving to the neighborhood in an effort to cooperate
19 with community requirements .
20
21 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth , to approve three dogs
22 in the home at 3209 36th avenue Northeast subject to the
23 condition that the dog ordinance is not violated and the
• 24 dogs become a nuisance .
^5
26 Council Member Makowske stated that she orininal3y intended
27 to vote in favor of approval but would vote against it
28 because the majority of neighbors (five out of nine) who had
99 expressed an opinion expressed opposition to three dogs in
30 the household , although she recognized and appreciated
31 Hodges ' s and Bartel ' s cooperation.
32
33 Aye: Enrooth , Marks , Ranallo .
34 relay: Makowske .
35
36 Motion carried
37
38 Bernhard Preussner asked what the penalty is for an
39 unlicensed dog, and Mr . Soth replied that as a misdemeanor
40 it carries a penalty of up to 90 days in jail or a $700
41 fine .
42
43 Council Member Marks commented that at the last Council
44 meeting a statement was made concerning the large number of
45 unlicensed dogs in St . Anthony but that he personally is
46 unaware of such a situation. Mr. Preussner stated that he
47 estimates there are at least 500 dogs in St . Anthony but
48 that fewer than 100 are actually licensed . Mayor Pro Tem
49 Ranallo remarked that at the last Council meeting it was
50 decided that the dog ordinance should be studied . He asked
• 1.1
I Mr . Soth for clarification of the dog licensing fee
2 structure . Mr. Soth stated that the fee charged for a dog
3 license is meant to cover the only the administrative cost
4 of the transaction and is not meant to be a profitable
5 enterprise .
6
7
8 ROAD SEALCOATING EQUIPMENT BIDS
9
10 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth , to accept the bids
11 according to the staff recommendations .
12 r
13 Motion carried unanimously.
14
15
16 RESOLUTION 89-029 , RE; HFWTJF'PIN COUTJTV ASSESSTNG SERi7TC7-S
17 FOR 1991 , 1992 , 1993 , AND 1994
18
19 Council Member Enrooth stated that since the agreement does
20 not expire until July 31 : 1990 , he would like to delay
21 action until he has a chance to meet with representatives of
22 Hennepin County and report back to the City Council .
23
24 Motion by Enrooth , seconded by Makowske , to table .
25
26 . Motion carried .
2.7
28
29 INSTITUTIONAL FEE ON THE LEAGUE OF MTNTJESOTA CITIES
30 INSURANCE TRUST `
31
32 Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo noted that a letter was received by
33 St . Anthony from the president of the League asking for
34 St . Anthony' s support of the fee . He commented that he
35 would be in favor of sending a letter to the League
36 supporting the fee rather than passing a resolution .
37
38 Motion by Makowske , seconded by Marks , to send a letter to
39 League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust in support of the
40 1 . 5% institutional fee to fund League projects .
41
42 In response to a question by Council. Member. Fnr. 00th , Mayor
4.3 Pro Tem Ranallo described the background of the I,T,ICIT, and
4.4 stated that the League of Minnesota Cities began a fund to
45 obtain an insurance program to which its members could
46 subscribe at a time when many communities found it difficult
47 if not impossible to obtain insurance at reasonable costa
4.8 He stated that the City ' s experience with that insurance
49 program has been excellent . The League is asking for an
50 institutional fee rather than charging a larger membership
12
1 fee in order to fund League projects , in the same way that
2 the insurance project was funded .
3
4 Council Member Enrooth commented that if the Council were to
5 make a recommendation, he would prefer that it be one that
6 would have positive impact on the City of St . Anthony, such
7 as one that would result in a reduction of the dues that
8 St. Anthony pays to LMCIT. Mavor Pro Tem Ranallo replied
9 that the City could, rather , take advantage of LMCIT
10 projects . The projects currently to be funded by the fee
11 include a computerized tax model to provide information to
12 member cities about taxation throughout the state and
13 country; and a personnel program including wage and salary
14 surveys .
15
16
17 Motion carried unanimously.
18
19
20 ADJOURNMENT
21
22 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth , to adjourn the meeting
• 23 at 9 : 06 p.m.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27
28
29 Respectfully submitted ,
30
�6�31
32 Doris Hoskin
33 Council Secretary
34
35
36
37 0
38
39 Mayor Pro em
404-Li
40
41
42
43 ATTEST:
44 City Clem
45
46
47
48
49
50