Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC CONTINUATION OF BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES 04231996 Meeting Sheet IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII 100985 Box: 19 Folder: CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1996 Document: CC MINUTES 04231996 r 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY CONTINUATION OF BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING MINUTES APRIL 23, 1996 4 I. CALL TO ORDER THE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING -FROM APRIL 9, 1996 5 MEETING. 6 The Board of Review meeting was continued at 6:30 P.M. by Mayor Ranallo.- 7 II. ROLL CALL. 8 Councilmembers Present: Ranallo, Enrooth, Faust, Marks, and Wagner. 9 Also Present: Michael Morrison, City Manager and Larry Miller, Hennepin County Principal 10 Appraiser. 11 _ 12 III. APPROVAL OF APRIL 9, 1996 BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES. 13 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to approve the April 9, 1996 Board of Review minutes as 14 presented. 15 Motion carried unanimously. 16 17 IV. CONTINUATION OF BOARD OF REVIEW. 18 Hennepin County Principal Appraiser,Larry Miller reported he had spoken with each of the four 19 people who had requested a review of their appraisal at the Board of Review Meeting on April 9, • 1996. The following homes had been reappraised and the results were as follows: 21 Previous EMV 22 PID# Taxpayer EMV Changed to 23 07-029-23-21-0060 Tom Rose $106,500 $106,500 24 2709 St. Anthony Blvd. Canceled Per Owner's Request 25 06-029-23-14-0023 M.K. & D.N. Michaeloff $158,000 $142,000 26 3604 Downers Drive 27 06-029-23-21-0071 Howard Krueger $137,000 $133,000 28 3631 Harding St. N.E. 29 06-029-23-42-0059 Jeff Light $87,000 $85,000 30 3119 Silver Lake Road 3.1 Miller explained the rationale for each determination and noted in each case he had performed 32 the physical inspection himself. 33 Mr. Miller contacted Mr. Rose to arrange an appointment to view the property and discuss the appraisal. Mr. Rose decided he did not wish to pursue a reappraisal and stated he was satisfied with the amount of the appraisal. 1, Board of Review Meeting Minutes April 23, 1996 • Page 2 1 Mr. Miller explained the Michaeloff property had not been inspected for many years. Upon 2 inspection he found there is much deferred maintenance. The house has dated gold carpet, the 3 wood trim and ceramic tile are in need of repair, and there are water leak marks on the ceiling. 4 For these reasons, it is recommended the market valuation be decreased to $142,000. 5 Mr. Miller explained the recommendation to decrease the valuation of the Krueger property was 6 due to the floor plan. There is a small entry way with steps down to the basement where 7 someone else lives. There is a long hallway which goes past the kitchen into the dining room. 8 Mr. Miller explained the main concern with the Light property was a water problem that the 9 owner was not aware of when he purchased the property. This problem has since been resolved 10 and was financed by the previous owner. The house is on a slab so the drain tiles had to be 11 installed on the interior of the home. Mr. Miller noted that the lack of a finished basement in this 12 home did not result in a large difference in value. 13 Mr. Miller noted all four residents have been notified of the result of the reassessment by 14 telephone and mail and appear to be satisfied. 15 Councilmember Faust noted the minutes of April 9, 1996 stated that the Light property was 16 valued at $85,500. Mr. Miller reported Mr. Light had taken the amount from a tax statement 0 from a previous year rather than the current valuation statement. 19 Motion by Marks, second by Wagner to accept and approve all recommendations of the 20 Hennepin County Assessor's Office on the residents appeals made at the April 9, 1996 Board of 21 Review meeting. 22 Motion carried unanimously. 23 Mr. Miller reported the review process for the upcoming year will begin in the end of July or first 24 of August. He explained the appraisers are now utilizing a brochure which explains the 25 assessment procedure and a card which identifies the appraiser. He reported his office had 26 received approximately 70 to 80 calls of inquiry regarding the results of the appraisals. 27 Mayor Ranallo congratulated Mr. Miller on the improvement of the appraisal methods used such 28 as performing appraisals in the evenings and utilizing the brochures. 29 30 V. ADJOURNMENT. 31 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to adjourn the meeting at 6:45 P.M. 32 Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Lorri Kopischke 35 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial