Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 80-069 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1980 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1981 AND THE 1981 CITY BUDGET Meeting Sheet IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII 102730 Box: 23 Folder: RES 1980 Document: RES 80-069 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1980 TAX LEVY., COLLECTIBLE IN 1981 AND THE 1981 CITY BUDGET f' RESOLUTION 80-069 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1980 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1981 AND THE 1981 CITY BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the. financial needs of the City for fiscal year 1981, and WHEREAS,. the Council has attempted to provide a level of expenditures necessary to provide an adequate level of service. NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT_ RE_ SOLVED, that the following sums of money be levied the current year, collectible in 1981; upon taxable property in the City of St. Anthony, for the following purpose: Fund Levy General (No. 101)_ $519,988 AND, FURTHERMORE, that sufficient funds have been provided for all debt service (bonded debt) obligations so that all tax levies for such obligations are hereby cancelled. • AND, FURTHERMORE, that the 1981 budget is hereby approved. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. Adopted this 7 46 day of , 1980 . Mayor ATTEST: (�_rl-4 A-04 J ,�6 City Clerk Reviewed for administration : • -' CiVy Manager MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7 , 1980 TO: Mayor and Councilmen FROM: Jim Fornell, City Manager SUBJECT: 1981 Budget and Tax Levy Attached are some final recommended modifications to the proposed 1981 budget and a resolution certifying the 1980/81 tax levy. The preparation of a budget is an art, not a science. It is impos- sible to project with perfect accuracy every expense and revenue. - Staff does . its best to control expenses and maximize revenues but through a fiscal year some budget transfers are necessary, in part due to changing needs. A contingency of $25,00.0 is provided as a last resort for some of these transfers , should revenues not exceed the estimate or should appropriations be inadequate and there are no other appropriations which are projected to be underspent. While budgets are inexact, I feel more comfortable with the analytical • quality of this and recent budgets due to improvements in format and monitoring. Data supports this : from 1977 to 1979 the City had general fund budgetary surpluses; from 1972-1976 we had deficits. (_In 1977 we had a surplus only because of the transferred assets of a terminated debt ,service fund'. ) The number of budget transfers has also been reduced. This budget is very lean. There is very little margin for error in estimates in an effort to produce a fiscally conservative budget. Reserves are adequate, with the exception of the sewer fund, and can provide a margin .of relief, if necessary. Some revenue sources are cause for concern: General Revenue Sharing, the liquor operation profits, and intergovernmental revenue sources. The "bottom line" is that one cannot have a highly conservative budget yet expect to provide a considerable margin for error and a very high service level. I would characterize this budget as conservative but prudent. The property tax consequence should be insignificant. According to mid-September assessed valuation figures , our mill levy should be: proposed levy 519 ,988 = 10 .28 mills assessed valuation 50 ,580 ,272 This compares with a 1979/80 mill levy of 11.197 mills. Homesteaded valuations have increased however, but the homestead tax credit has -2- also increased. The net. impact should be a modest decrease in the net cost of City services paid by the homeowning taxpayer, U1 imately, this may e-unrealistic over the.. next few. years, should costs continue to rise. People can't continue to expect little or no increase in their total tax bill. from all sources without a reduction in service level (witness the state' s. mandated 8% expenditure reductions and resulting service level reductions) . RECOMMENDATION I recommend the adoption of the. budget and the mill. levy Cas modi- fied) . The City Council could- increase the mill levy as follows, however: $519 ,988 as proposed 16 ,385 to levy limitation (actual) (_l)' 173 ,000 special levies Cest.) ('2.) $709 ,373. maximum. levy (est. ) This would be a mill levy of 14 .0 mills which is .about the suburban city average. The City levy in St. Anthony is less than the suburban average; the School and, to a lesser extent, the County levy is more than the suburban average. I would recommend against a sizable increase in the levy, especially for capital improvements until priorities are fixed, needs are clear and the cost/benefit is justified. In my opinion, it is not wise to build significant surpluses without a reason for them. JWF/cjk cc: Department Heads (1) The levy limit has been increased in the amount of the State Aid to Local Government decrease. (21 Miscellaneous. The "city' s bill" means a special levy of up to $130,000. • RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS (Explanation to follow) A. General Fund ESTIMATED REVENUES Change to $1,376 ,435 (orig". ) 3000-3011 - Property taxes 519 ,988 + 2 ,850 3300-3380 - Snow/ice rev. (Henn. Cty. ) 3 ,800 + 700 3300-3340 - State aid 230 ,800 + 1,900 3900-3988 - Revenue sharing transfer 50,000 -10 ,000 Final- Recommended Est. Rev. $1,371,885 APPROPRIATIONS $1,376 ,435 (orig-. ) 4051-3350 - Insurance 47 ,000 - 3 ,000 4080-3200 - Planning; _.Consilti4g/ 0 -12 ,000 Contracted services 4095-3200 - Buildings; Consulting/ 18 ,000 + 2 ,500 Contracted services 4110-1100 - Police; salaries reg. 291,000 + 2 ,000 4110-1110 - Police; salaries overtime 20 ,000 + 3 ,000 4110-3330 - Police; care of prisoners 7 ,000 + 3 ,500 • 4120-2215 - Fire; communications 10 ,750 + 250 4120-3410 - Fire; travel., conf. , schools 1,500 + 100 4120-3420 - Fire; subscriptions &memberships 600 + 100 4.210-4530 - P.W. ; machinery & equipment 12 ,600 - 6 ,000 4010-6710 - Council; contingency 25,000 + 5 ,000 Final Recommended Appropriations $1,371,885 B. Sewer Fund ESTIMATED REVENUES $ 197 ,160 (orig. ) No change unless the sewer rate is in- creased. Without an increase, the deficit will be slightly larger. Final $ 197 ,160 APPROPRIATIONS $ 300 ,650 (orig. ) 4810-3200 - Consulting services 3,100 + 600 Final $ 301,250 C. Water Fund ESTIMATED REVENUES $ 173,675 (orig. ) No change as there is a small projected surplus based upon the current water rate. Final $ 173 ,675 APPROPRIATIONS Charge to $ 173 ,675 (orig.) 4820-3:200 - Consulting services 3,800 + 600 4820-6800 - Retained earnings 1,075 - 600 Final $ 173 ,675