Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL MINUTES 05191987 Meeting Sheet 111 11111 gill 1111 11111 1111 1111 iovoa Box: 21 Folder: PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1987 Document: PL MINUTES 05191987 C 2= OF S T . ANTHONY • P L ANN 2 NG COMM 2 S S 2 ON M=NUTS S MAY :3L9 ' 1987 1 The meeting was called to order by Chair Franzese at 8:00 P.M. 2 due to school board election and closing of polls at that time. 3 4 Present . for roll call: Franzese, London, Wingard, Hansen, 5 Wagner, Wer,enicz, and Madden. 6 7 Also present: David Childs, City Manager. 8 9 APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 10 11 Motion by Wagner, seconded by Hansen to approve as submitted the 12 minutes of the April 21, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. 13 14 Motion carried unanimously. 15 16 Commissioner Madden will represent the Planning Commission at the 17 May 26, 1987 Council meeting. 18 19 PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 .21 Chair Franzese opened the public hearing at 8:02 P.M. and read 22 the legal notice which had been published in the Bulletin, May 6, 23 1987 . This request is in regard to a request from Herberger' s 24 Inc. and C. G. Rein Co. for a sign variance at Apache Plaza. 25 26 The request is to install two 519" X 20' signs on the existing 27 Apache Plaza pylon sign located near 39th Avenue N.E. on Silver 28 Lake Road. 29 30 No one present had expressed failure to receive the notice or 31 objected to its contents. 32 33 A staff report was given by Mr. Childs explaining that 34 Herberger' s will be installing one 150 square foot wall sign on 35 the west side of Apache Plaza, as allowed by the Ordinance. They 36 feel that since they have no Silver Lake Road visibility, the 37 variance is needed to provide proper identification for their .38 store. Mr. Childs also reported that the free-standing sign 39 located on Stinson Boulevard and 39th Avenue N.E. has been 40 removed. That sign, which was a legal non-conforming sign ( 200- 41 250 feet in size) , had been located on land not owned by Apache 42 Plaza, and was recently removed. 43 44 George Torrey, representing Herberger' s, was present and gave the 45 following information: 46 047 *store has projected opening of late July; 48 49 *Managers will be on site in early June to hire sales 50 force; A T' 1 -2- 2 3 *anchor stores, such as this, usually have end locations, 4 which gives visibility that Herberger' s lacks in this situ- 5 ation; 6 7 *the store will be 40 ,000 square feet of retail space, with 8 15,000 square feet downstairs for offices, storage, and 9 employee lounges, etc. (the J. C. Penney store has a total 10 of 57 ,000 square feet, Warner' s has 25,000 square feet) ; 11 12 *Herberger' s has studied the need for the sign carefully and 13 feel it is definitely needed or they would not be expending 14 $6,500 to construct it; 15 16 *their nearest store, and only other Twin Cities store, is a 17 50,000 square foot store in the Signal Hills Center in 18 West St. Paul. Herberger' s considers Apache area to be 19 excellent as a marketable location. 20 21 Chair Franzese asked why the sign is permanent rather than 22 temporary since people in the immediate area generally know what 23 is located at Apache and where it is. 24 25 Mr. Torrey reported that in order for them to be successful, they 26 are going to expand the shopping scope of Apache, pulling 27 shoppers who otherwise might go to Rosedale or Northtown. Their 28 stores are comparable to the major department stores in brand .%29 and product selection, except they do not have furniture, 30 appliances or electronics. The current location has been vacant 31 since 1981, so they feel that it is imperative that they get 32 exposure on Silver Lake Road. 33 34 When asked by Commissioner Hansen how long they have known that 35 they needed a variance, Mr. Torrey responded that the terms of 36 their lease included permission from Apache to put a sign on 37 Silver Lake Road, but they learned of the City' s restrictions 38 when they applied for a sign permit 30 to 45 days ago. 39 40 When asked whether other Apache tenants would be making the same 41 request, Mr. Dennis Cavanaugh, C. G. Rein Co. , stated that the 42 Apache Plaza owners wanted to avoid the Robert Street look in 43 terms of signage, and would not allow another sign on the pylon 44 and would submit a letter agreeing not to request another sign to 45 be mounted on the pylon. 46 47 No persons were present to speak in opposition of the request and 48 the hearing was closed at 8:25 P.M. 49 50 Commissioner Hansen excused himself from the meeting at 8: 30 P.M. 51 52 After considerable discussion about setting a precedent and 53 assuring that only one sign ever be allowed to be placed on the 0-54 pylon, recalling the St. Anthony Village Shopping Center signage 5 1 -4- • 2 3 *Mr. Evanson has met with Dr. Osterbauer and had given him 4 plans. Dr. Osterbauer made no commitment of approval, but 5 did not object. It is expected that his retaining wall 6 would not be removed. 7 8 The Commissioners had numerous questions and concerns as follows: 9 10 -provision of silt fences or haybales for erosion control 11 during excavation; 12 13 -better contour lines for slope to adjacent lots, especially 14 Osterbauer to the southwest and Lee Larwick to the north- 15 east; 16 17 -maximum of 3/1 slope for slopes in subdivision or adjacent 18 lots. 19 20 Motion by Wagner, seconded by Werenicz to recommend approval by 21 the City Council of the grading plan and final plat for Gardena 22 Acres, with the following conditions: 23 24 1. No building permits will be issued until grading is 25 completed in substantial conformance with the grading 26 plan ( substantial defined as within 1 - 2 feet of final 27 grade except within 5 feet at the northeast property •28 line) ; 29 30 2. Erosion control to be provided by silt fence or haybales 31 to City standards; 32 33 3 . Applicant to prepare for City Council amendments to the 34 grading plan showing existing and proposed contours 35 showing acceptable drainage into existing match points-; 36 37 4 . Applicant to acquire necessary slope easements from 38 adjacent property owner on northeast; 39 40 5 . Maximum of 3 to 1 slope on this property to include 41 especially the northeast adjacent property and Dr. Ost- 42 erbauer' s property on the southwest. 43 44 Motion carried unanimously. 45 46 MISCELLANEOUS 47 48 DAIRY QUEEN SIGN 49 50 The Planning Commission reiterated their concerns about the 51 signage at the Dairy Queen. They stated that they were led 52 to believe that the Dairy Queen remodeling was to add •53 space on the back side and were very surprised when the 54 1 -5- 2 3 structure was completely leveled and rebuilt. They had denied a 4 new free-standing sign with the understanding that Mr. Plaisted 5 could have the rotating (non-conforming roof sign) and one wall 6 sign . The property has two wall signs plus the roof sign and 7 the Commissioners find this to be in violation of the Sign 8 Ordinance. 9 10 Staff was asked to notify Mr. Plaisted of his sign violation and 11 to report back as to progress toward removal of the illegal sign. 12 13 KENZIE TERRACE PROJECT UPDATE 14 15 The City Manager notified the Planning Commission about the 16 current status of the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project.. 17 18 *Arkand Partnership is in default on the redevelopment 19 agreement; 20 21 *the City is seeking to replace them as developers; 22 23 *the City ordered a market study to help in finding a new 24 redeveloper. That study shows that a market exists for 25 only 100 to an absolute maximum of 150 units of new senior 26 rental units at the site; 27 •28 *recalculations of the tax increment also indicate that a 2.9 lower density, perhaps as low as 200 units, might be 30 possible; 31 32 *it appears that a part senior rental ( 100-150 units)-part 33 commercial or townhouse project would not be feasible; 34 35 *alternatives will be explored with the residents in the 36 neighborhood and their input will be asked for in the near 37 future. 38 39 The Planning Commission was of the consensus that this approach 40 seemed reasonable. 41 42 ADJOURNMENT 43 44 Motion by Wagner, seconded by Werenicz to adjourn the Planning 45 Commission meeting at 10 : 15 P.M. 46 47 Motion carried unanimously. 48 49 50 Respectfully submitted, 51 52 David Childs, City Manager •53 54 :cjk