Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL MINUTES 11171992 Meeting Sheet IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII 101329 Box: 19 Folder: PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1992 Document: PL MINUTES 11171992 r 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING . 4 5 NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 6 7 1 . CALL TO ORDER 8 9 The Planning Commission Meeting was called to order at 7 : 30 10 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairperson 11 Faust . 12 13 2 . ROLL CALL 14 15 Commissioners Present : Thompson, Franzese, Gondorchin, Murphy, 16 Werenicz, Madden and_ Faust . 17 18 Staff Present : Management Assistant Dave Urbia 19 20 3 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 20 , 1992 PLANNING 21 COMMISSION MEETING 22 23 Motion by Madden, second by Murphy to approve the minutes of 24 the October 20 , 1992 Planning Commission Meeting with the 25 following corrections : 26 page 2 , line 37 : Delete "Condo Division" and replace with "complex" 9 page 2 , line 43 : Delete "a group of attorneys" and replace 30 with "a federal agency" 31 page 3 , line 29 : Replace "Amoco" with "Unical " 32 page 4 , line 13 : Delete "and" 33 page 4 , line 25: Correct "feeet" with "feet" 34 page 4 , line 41 : Correct "west" with "east" 35 page 7 , line 49 : Place a semicolon after "hearing" 36 page 8 , line 6 : Place a semicolon after "approved" 37 page 8 , line 7 : Place a semicolon after "statement" 38 page 11 , line 16/17 : Delete the entire sentence. On line 17 39 replace "He" with "Commissioner Murphy" 40 page 13 , line 8 : Add at the end of this paragraph, 41 "Commissioner Madden noted that the maps were not readable. " 42 page 16, line 46 : Insert after "money" the phrase "by December 43 31st" 44 page 16, line 49 : add to the end of the sentence, " that given 45 that the plan was presented as a concept plan and adjustments 46 are acceptable•. " 47 48 49 Motion carried unanimously 50 • I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 2 NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 • 3 PAGE 2 4 5 6 4 . DESIGNATION OF COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE DECEMBER 7 7 1992 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8 9 Commissioner Thompson will represent the Planning Commission 10 at the December 7th Council Meeting. It was noted that the 11 regularly scheduled Council Meeting of the 8th of December was 12 changed to December 7th. 13 14 5.. PUBLIC HEARING 15 16 A. Request for Subdivision/Plat Approval , Dennis Cavanauah, 17 C. G. Rein Company 18 19 The Public Hearing was opened by Chairperson Faust at 7 : 44 20 p.m. 21 22 Chairperson Faust noted that notice of this public hearing 23 appeared in the October 28 , 1992 edition of the Bulletin . 24 25 The request is for a subdivision/plat approval for the Tires 26 Plus company, located at 3800 Silver Lake Road. Approval is 27 required for the tax increment financing proposal for the 8 area. 0 A memo from the Management Assistant addressed all issues of 31 concern regarding this request . The memo also indicated that 32 the ordinance which applies in this situation had been 33 reviewed and the request appears to comply with all of the 34 requirements of the ordinance. The parcel needs to be removed 35 from the Tax Increment Financing District . 36 37 Mr. Cavanaugh was in attendance only to respond to any 38 questions members of the Planning Commission may have. He 39 stated he felt the staff had done a very good job in assisting 40 him with this request . 41 42 The Public Hearing was closed at 7 : 47 p.m. 43 44 Motion by Madden, second by Murphy to recommend to the City 45 Council approval of the subdivision/plat approval request from 46 the C. G. Rein .Company on behalf of the Tires Plus Company, 47 3800 Silver Lake Road recognizing that the request meets all 48 of the requirements of the ordinance. 49 50 Motion carried unanimously 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 PAGE 3 4 5 6 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7 8 A. Appoint Plannina Commissioner to Environmental 9 Ouality/Recycling Committee . 10 11 Urbia advised that the first meeting of this committee is 12 scheduled for November 19th. This will be an organizational 13 meeting and by-laws will be adopted and the 1993 meeting 14 schedule will be established . He noted that the purpose of the 15 committee will be to broaden the scope of environmental issues 16 beyond just _ rec:ycing matters to include_ water quality and 17 solid waste. This committee would also provide a forum for 18 resident input . 19 20 The Committee ' s duties shall include but not be limited to: 21 22 1 . Reviewing development proposals for environmental 23 concerns and storm water quality. 24 25 2 . Study and make recommendations on solid waste management 26 and recycling. 3 . Providing input into the local watershed planning 7 process . 30 31 4 . Providing educational programs and information to the 32 public on environmental issues. 33 34 5 . Protection and enhancement of lakes and wetlands . 35 36 Chairperson Faust inquired if this committee would include the 37 Beautification Committee. Urbia responded that it evolved from 38 the Recycling Committee and will address smaller environmental 39 issues . He felt this committee will not be addressing issues 40 similar to those addressed by the Planning Commission. 41 - 42 Urbia advised the committee will have nine members in addition 43 to Councilmember Enrooth, a member of the Planning Commission 44 and members of the staff . The committee will meet quarterly. 45 46 Commissioner Gondorchin observed there will be a great deal to 47 be done by this comm.ittee and he felt it was unlikely this 48 could be done when it meets only quarterly. 49 50 • 1 , 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17, 1992 0 PAGE 4 4 5 6 Commissioner Franzese indicated her interest on serving on 7 this committee but is unable to attend the November 19th 8 meeting. She requested someone on the Planning Commission 9 attend this particular meeting and bring any information 10 gotten back to the next Planning Commission Meeting. She also 11 requested that the commissioner who attends this meeting 12 specify that his attendance is only . a communication tool for 13 the Planning Commission. 14 15 Chairperson Faust indicated he felt he could deal more 16 effectively on the problems of t-he north end of town .by not 17 serving on this committee. 1.8 19 The length of service will be one year for the volunteer from 20 the Planning Commission. Commissioner Gondorchin will attend 21 the meeting on November 19th . Commissioners Franzese and 22 Murphy stated their availability to be a "filler." on this 23 committee. 24 25 26 B. Redevelopment Plan - 3112 Silver Lake Road The St . Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority is 9 requesting the Planning Commission to consider a redevelopment 30 plan for the substandard house and parcel located at 3112 31 Silver Lake Road . 32 33 Urbia advised that the goal of the HRA is to upgrade the 34 City' s housing stock and to retain control as to what is built 35 on any parcels acquired. This parcel may not be the best for 36 a test case he stated. It has a sixty-six foot frontage and 37 may require a variance. Many of the lots on this particular 38 block have similar frontages . 39 40 Urbia noted that a complete inventory of the City' s housing 41 stock has not yet been done and the City Attorney has advised 42 against doing this at this time . 43 44 The owner has indicated an interest in selling this parcel . It 45 is assessed at $49, 000 and the asking price is the same. The 46 value placed ori" the lot is $25, 000 and Urbia felt it could be 47 sold for considerably more. 48 49 Chairperson Faust expressed a concern with the City being in 50 the business of buying and selling of property. He noted that 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 PAGE 5 4 5 6 the potential for the City to lose approximately $15, 000 with 7 this particular situation could be a problem. 8 9 A private developer has not been selected for this specific 10 site. Urbia advised that staff has to develop standards and 11 criteria to be met by a developer. He noted that in all 12 instances the staff will attempt to minimize the City' s 13 losses . 14 15 Commissioner Franzese noted she has concern with the standards 16 used-to label a structure as "blight . " Commissioner Gondorchin 17 feels the house is definitely substandard and is supportive of 18 attempts to upgrade this property. He also noted that is a 19 rental property and will remain rental property if left in its 20 present state. 21 22 Chairperson Faust questioned whether this property had been on 23 the market long enough to establish it as a problem. He 24 recalled where Advanced Designs had purchased property in the 25 City and built two very nice homes . There was no need for City 26 involvement with this firm. 27 Discussion continued regarding contacting developers about potential building sites where substandard housing is 30 presently located . It was felt this may be more advisable to 31 try before the City actually gets involved with acquisitions 32 and demolitions . 33 34 Motion by Madden, second by Franzese that the Planning 35 Commission recommends to the St . Anthony HRA that the 36 acquistion of the substandard house and land at 3112 Silver 37 Lake Road be deferred until the market place has had an 38 opportunity to find if it is saleable , or saleable at a 39 reduced price, and if , at a later date, the St . Anthony HRA 40 finds out it is not saleable, to pursue acquisition, and the 41 City actually pursue a developer for the available property. 42 43 Motion carried unanimously 44 45 46 C. Concept Review - Additional Frontaae Sian for 2808 47 Anthony Lane South 48 49 No background material was received regarding this matter 50 so it was removed from the agenda. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 PAGE 6 4 5 6 D. Sian Ordinance - Consider Amoratization , Other City 7 Attorney Findings 8 9 The City Council adopted the revised sign ordinance at its 10 October 13 , 1992 meeting. At the time the Planning Commission 11 recommended revisions it was felt that some additional issues 12 needed further review. The two main issues for review were 13 amortization (removal of legal , non-conforming signs) and 14 removal of illegal non-conforming signs . 15 16 Memos from the City Attorney regarding both of these issues 17 were included in the agenda packet . He gave a number of 18 opinions regarding amortization . He suggested citations be 19 issued for illegal non-conforming signs . 20 21 Chairperson Faust felt the first issue to be addressed by the 22 Planning Commission was the enforcement feature of sign 23 removal . He suggested that it should not be pursued further if 24 ordinances were not going to be inforced. He felt this is the 25 case with some of the ordinances and regulations the City 26 presently has on the books . 27 Urbia suggested that a comprehensive sign ordinance should be considered. 30 31 It was the opinion of the Chairperson that members of the 32 Planning Commission were displeased with the present lack of 33 enforcement of the Sign Ordinance . 34 35 Commissioner Murphy requested a point of clarification 36 regarding what the City Council wanted the Planning Commission 37 to act on regarding this matter . Urbia advised it was included 38 in the agenda for general discussion and recommendations on 39 the two aforementioned items . 40 41 Chairperson Faust inquired who would represent the City if the 42 Sign Ordinance was challenged in court . Urbia responded that 43 the City Attorney would represent the City in these matters . 44 The City Attorney had stated that amortization would be ill- 45 advised . 46 47 Commissioner Murphy felt amortization would be an effective 48 tool for enforcement , although he noted that present 49 ordinances are not being enforced. 50 • 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 IN PAGE 7 4 5 6 Motion by Franzese, second by Madden to set aside this issue 7 and put back on the agenda when the Planning Commission can 8 meet with Bill Soth, the City Attorney. 9 10 11 Motion carried unanimously 12 13 14 E. Proposed Plannina Commission BY-Laws 15 16 The third draft of the proposed by-laws for the Planning 17 Commission were included in the agenda packet . 18 19 Commissioner Madden noted he was not present at the meeting 20 where the by-laws were first discussed. He inquired where the 21 need for the by-laws was initiated. 22 23 Chairperson Faust had suggested by-laws be drafted by staff 24 and viewed them as providing some guidelines and standard 25 operating procedures . 26 27 Commissioner Madden held the opinion that by-laws were not needed. He suggested rather than using "Chair" and "Vice Chair" in the by-laws that "Chairperson" would be more gender 30 correct . 31 32 The by-laws were reviewed line by line with the following 33 corrections , deletions and additions : 34 35 Section 4 (A) Delete ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) and renumber ( 5) to ( 3) 36 37 Section 6 was changed to read as follows : "Four members of 38 the commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction 39 of business . " 40 41 Section 9 should be included in Section 8 and all of the 42 following sections should be renumbered. 43 44 Section 11 ( 6 ) should read as follows : "Planning Commission 45 asks any questions it may have of the proponents, opponents, 46 or staff , and "then takes action in accordance with Robert ' s 47 Rules of Order. " 48 49 Section 15 should be eliminated in its entirety. 50 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 PAGE 8 4 5 6 Various comments made by the commissioners included seeing 7 term limitations as a non-issue, and favoring compensation for 8 members of the Commission. 9 10 The Chairperson requested the Management Assistant to mail 11 copies of the amended by-laws to all members of the Planning 12 Commission for their review. He suggested that if there are 13 any more changes members of the Commission want included they 14 notify Urbia. Urbia was requested to present the amended by- 15 laws to the City Council at its December 7th Council meeting.. 16 He also wanted this item on the December Planning Commission - 17 meeting agenda. 18 19 20 F. Separation of Undersized Lots Held in Sinale Ownership 21 22 The resident at 3127 Silver Lake Road approached the City 23 regarding separation of undersized lots held in single 24 ownership. Staff determined this would be a policy issue and 25 contacted the City Attorney to provide legal insight into the 26 issue. The City Attorney advised by letter that the half-section maps 7 for the City should be reviewed to determine whether there 30 should be an ordinance change requiring single ownership or a 31 grandfathering provision. 32 33 Staff reviewed the half-section maps and determined there are 34 a significant number of old plats with very small lots. Staff 35 concluded it would be advisable to have an ordinance 36 prohibiting the separation of legally platted lots if the lots 37 do not conform to current zoning ordinances when separated. 38 39 Commissioner Franzese felt that some policies should be 40 formulated as to where the City wants to go with these types 41 of matters . 42 43 Motion by Franzese that this item be placed on the agenda when 44 the City Attorney, Bill Soth, will be in attendance. The 45 motion was withdrawn . 46 47 Chairperson Faust felt the Planning Commission was being 48 requested .to •develop some kind of .philosophy for the City 49 50 • 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 40 PAGE 9 4 5 6 7 Attorney to comment on . Commissioner Franzese commented that 8 there are seminars which address substandard lots in inner 9 ring suburbs . She felt the City needed a well thought out 10 philosophy. 11 12 It was the consensus of the Planning Commission members that 13 information regarding how many lots presently exist in the 14 City which would qualify for this consideration be gotten 15 before -any policy could be formulated. 16 17 The matter was tabled for additional information. 18 19 20 7 . STAFF UPDATE 21 22 A. Proposed Ordinance Changes 23 24 The items contained in the memo from Urbia to the City Manager 25 addressed proposed ordinance changes as discussed at the joint 26 meeting of the Planning Commission and the City Council . 27 Commissioner Madden noted that the items addressed in the memo did not take the form of recommendations to the City Council 30 from the Planning Commission. 31 32 Regarding the issue of attendance, Chairperson Faust felt the 33 original language should be put back into the ordinance . He 34 mentioned the issue of compensation for Commissioners to the 35 Mayor and to the staff . 36 37 Commissioner Werenicz inquired if compensation was legal . 38 Commissioner Gondorchin questioned whether this would be 39 compensation or a per diem. Urbia will research the matter but 40 noted that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities had 41 advised that no planning commission members in the 42 metropolitan area receive any compensation . 43 44 Commissioner Franzese felt work rendered by commissioners is 45 recognized by compensation but this is not being proposed for 46 'next year ' s budget . She also felt the dollar amount mentioned 47 is not significant . 48 49 Chairperson Faust felt compensation is appropriate. 50 Commissioner Werenicz does not support compensation. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 PAGE 10 4 5 6 Commissioner Murphy does not support -compensation but recalled 7 that cable representatives did receive basic service and two 8 premium channels without cost . 9 10 Urbia will also look into reimbursement for mileage for 11 commissioners to attend seminars and travel within the City. 12 13 Commissioner Franzese felt the minutes should speak for 14 themselves and the Commission should take no action. 15 Commissionr Werenicz felt since the Commission members were 16 divided on the issue a vote should be taken. 17 18 Motion by Faust , second by Werenicz that the City Council 19 consider compensating Planning Commission members . 20 21 Roll call : Thompson , Faust - aye 22 Werenicz, Murphy, Gondochin - nay 23 Franzese, Madden - abstain 24 25 Motion fails 26 27 B. Planning Commission Parking Subcommittee 0 This item will be tabled until the December meeting of the 30 Planning Commission. 31 32 Commissioner Madden inquired when the results of the survey 33 will be completed. Urbia responded they will be ready by 34 March . 35 36 Chairperson Faust observed that a subcommittee would allow for 37 non-public meetings to discuss this sensitive matter. 38 Commissioner Gondorchin felt definitions of various types of 39 vehicles would be helpful for the subcommittee. Urbia will get 40 this information . 41 42 Urbia felt the subcommittee could probably start meeting in 43 January or February. Staff will gather some preliminary 44 information for the subcommittee. The Chairperson recommended 45 that staff contact the City of Edina regarding its 46 recreational vehicle policy. 47 48 Commissioner Madden stated his interest in being involved in 49 the process but felt an ordinance would be needed. He noted 50 that nearly all of those residents who attended previous 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 2 NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 PAGE 11 4 5 6 meetings where this topic was discussed were against any 7 ordinance which prohibited parking of this type of vehicle. 8 9 Commissioner Murphy requested a clarification regarding the 10 surveys . Urbia advised that the present survey addresses 11 community needs and another survey will be done in March . He 12 also suggested that a work session be held by the Planning 13 Commission to hammer out definitions . 14 15 Commissioner Gondochin noted he had participated in the phone 16 survey and felt it was difficult to respond thoroughly with 17 this format . 18 19 Urbia advised the Planning Commission that the property owner 20 of the parcel located on the southeast corner of 37th Avenue 21 and Silver Lake Road is interested in building a six foot 22 fence along 37th Avenue. He inquired what position the 23 Commission members may have on this request . 24 25 It was noted that the house is for sale. Commissioner Thompson 26 felt the house should never have been built there but rather 27 a right hand turn lane should have been installed. Commissioner Madden suggested the hill should be cut down for visibility . The majority of the Planning Commission members 30 were opposed to this fence being built . 31 32 Chairperson Faust acknowledged Rosemary Franzese' s election to 33 the Hennepin County Park Board and congratulated her. 34 35 8 . COMMISSIONER' S COMMENTS 36 37 Commissioner Madden inquired as .to the status of the CUB Food 38 Store project at Apache Plaza . Urbia responded that it is 39 moving along. 40 41 Commissioner Murphy requested current information regarding 42 the Athletic Sports Boosters offer for renovation of Central 43 Park. Commissioner Gondorchin advised that the School Board 44 will be receiving the funds and can make changes later. 45 46 Commissioner Murphy inquired as to the status of the Housing 47 Maintenance Code. Urbia responded that it was passed and there 48 was only one problem, that being with the section on 49 composting . 50 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 2 NOVEMBER 17 , 1992 PAGE 12 4 5 6 9. ADJOURNMENT 7 8 Motion by Madden, second by Murphy to adjourn the Planning 9 Commission Meeting at 10 : 45 p.m. 10 11 Motion carried unanimously 12 13 14 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 17 18 Jo-Anne Student , Planning Commission Secretary 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 0 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 •