HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL MINUTES 01301996 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
101026
Box: 19
Folder: PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1996
Document: PL MINUTES 01301996
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
3 SPECIAL MEETING
4 JANUARY 30, 1996
5 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
6 The meeting was called to order and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chair Bergstrom at 7:10
7 p.m.
8
9 II. ROLL CALL.
10 Commissioners present: Bergstrom,Delmonico,Gondorchin,Franzese,Thompson,and Horst.
11 Commissioners absent: Makowske.
12 Also present: Kim Moore-Sykes,Management Assistant;Bill Soth,City Attorney;Michael
13 Morrison, City Manager; Larry Hamer, Public Works Director; and Cathy
14 Sorensen, Recording Secretary.
III. DESIGNATE COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO FEBRUARY 13, 1996 COUNCIL
MEETING.
17 Commissioner Horst was designated as the Planning Commission representative for the February
18 13, 1996 Council meeting.
19 Chair Bergstrom welcomed those attending the public hearing,and commended the audience on their
20 interest in the Apache Plaza project. Chair Bergstrom introduced Bill Soth, Mike Morrison, Kim
21 Moore-Sykes, and Cathy Sorensen.
22 Chair Bergstrom gave an overview for the public hearing process. He continued that through the
23 redevelopment attempt one year ago, much was learned and the process will be better for it.
24 Chair Bergstrom gave an overview of the approval process by category, with the first being the
25 Environmental Assessment Worksheet. He explained that initial environmental assessments
26 measures environmental impact of the project, evaluates impact on human health, traffic, storm
27 water, air and.noise pollution. He continued it is a very comprehensive plan, and is currently open
28 for public comments. Chair Bergstrom explained written comments are solicited and should be
29 completed to.the City by February 14, 1996.
30 Chair Bergstrom continued the second category in the approval process would be City Council
31 approval. He explained the Council will approve approximately 10 items regarding construction
before the project is begun.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 2
1 Chair Bergstrom explained the last category in the approval process are permits required by other
2 government agencies, such as the Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, and
3 the Rice Creek Watershed, who determines proper grading, water quality, and run off.
4 Chair Bergstrom continued this was a portion of a larger context,and that projects get much scrutiny
5 before construction begins. He continued the Planning Commission's role in the process is to ensure
6 the projects presented are consistent with current property and land use zoning requirements outlined
7 in the Comprehensive Plan.
8 Chair Bergstrom explained there were two public hearings on the agenda, one to approve the
9 preliminary plat to subdivide the lots, and the second to evaluate a request for a setback variance
10 from the lot lines. He continued a review of the comprehensive sign plan was also on the agenda,
11 but was not open to public hearing. Chair Bergstrom explained the Planning Commission makes
12 recommendations to the City Council, but the Council has the final approval.
13 Chair Bergstrom explained a representative from OPUS would present an overview the project for
14 the audience, as well as a brief overview of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW),
15 because the scope of the EAW is much larger than what can be reviewed this evening. He continued
16 a public hearing will be opened, a report will be made by staff, a representative from OPUS will be
available for questions from the Planning Commission and the public, and a motion will be made.
18 Chair Bergstrom instructed those wishing to comment speak into the microphone, state their name
19 and address, and to keep their comments brief and to the point. Chair Bergstrom continued the
20 Planning Commission is very familiar with the Apache Plaza project, and has had several concept
21 reviews, work sessions, and meetings with staff regarding the project.
22 Jay Scott, Director of Development of OPUS Corporation, thanked the Planning Commission and
23 audience for the opportunity to present the project and to share OPUS'thoughts and ideas. Mr. Scott
24 explained that OPUS is acting as a facilitator and development consultant for the Apache Plaza
25 project, working with SuperValu, Ste. Marie Corporation, and the City. He continued OPUS was
26 hopeful to be involved in ownership at a future point. He explained that OPUS Corporation is over
27 40 years old,and is the largest developer in the nation. He continued that OPUS has developed over
28 eight million square feet nationwide, 36 percent of which is retail. Mr. Scott explained OPUS has
29 developments in Maple Grove, Golden Valley, Eagan, and Highland Park, and that he oversees
30 developments in a five to six state region.
31 Mr. Scott explained the Planning Commission has a detailed report of the redevelopment plans. He
32 continued the redevelopment would be completed in one phase, possibly two, but that paramount
33 to that success would be approval of subdivision of the lot into seven separate lots.
•
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 3
1 Mr. Scott continued Cub Foods is planned for the health club space and 100,000 additional square
2 feet. He stated plans to demolish the former J.C. Penney site, as well as the mall's north wall. Mr.
3 Scott explained a new wall will be built to cap the north wall, and that a zero lot line approval will
4 be needed because the building will encroach once completed.
5 Mr. Scott explained storm water and drainage will involve construction and maintenance of a
6 comprehensive drainage treatment and ponding system,and that it will comply with the Rice Creek
7 Watershed. He continued it will handle Cub Foods,First Bank, and two other outlots of specialty
8 retail stores. Mr. Scott explained the comprehensive drainage plan has been designed to
9 accommodate future phases, and that the information is with the Environmental Assessment
10 Worksheet and complies with the Rice Creek Watershed. He continued that plans were for the City
11 to maintain the drainage system once construction is complete, as the City will ensure maintenance
12 is done correctly and in a timely manner.
13 Mr. Scott continued that no decision has been made to future redevelopment, but stated the plans
14 were exciting and that OPUS' goal is the same as the City's and the residents, envisioning Apache
15 Plaza as a strip/commercial center, with larger retailers.
16 Joan Ahrens,representative for Cub Foods/SuperValu, stated they have been involved in the project
for some time, and are happy to be in the final process. She explained that Cub Foods will occupy
8 9 1/2 acres on the north side of the mall, and will be a 75,000 square foot new prototype•store,
19 smaller than the Crystal and Maple Grove stores, but similar to the Maplewood store. Ms. Ahrens
20 stated construction is planned for May or June, with store opening in October. She continued that
21 Cub will employ 250-300 people, and will be a positive influence in the community.
22 Craig Matheson, Project Manager of PlanMark, stated the Cub Foods will be a fresh-focus store,
23 with a full line deli, seafood, bakery, and floral shop on one side.
24
25 Chair Bergstrom inquired if there were any questions from the public. Mr. Doug Jones,2505 Silver
26 Lake Road,asked for more information on the proposed signage. Chair Bergstrom responded it will
27 be addressed later in the agenda.
28 IV. PUBLIC HEARING.
29 A. Application for Subdivision of Land- Ste. Marie Company
30 Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Kim Moore-Sykes read the staff report:
31 Ste. Marie Corporation, current owner of the Apache Plaza Shopping Center, is requesting a
32 subdivision of land in order to redevelop the shopping center. The purpose of the subdivision and
replatting of this property is to enhance the orderly redevelopment of the property, providing
04 interested retailers the opportunity to take advantage of redeveloped property as it becomes available
35 and allowing the existing mall to remain in operation during the redevelopment.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 4
1 The replatting of the property will allow for the creation of seven(7)retail lots and three (3) outlots
2 for the construction of storm water retention ponds. Lot 1 is being planned for the construction of
3 a 75,200 square foot Cub Food store; Lot 2 (First Bank), Lot 5 (Tires Plus), and Lot 6 (Taco Bell)
4 will be maintained in their existing retail use; and Lots 3 and 4 will be redeveloped for a single-
5 tenant or multi-tenant retail facilities. Lot 7 will contain the existing mall and the balance of the
6 property, all of which may be redeveloped at a later date.
7 The whole of the Apache Plaza Shopping Center is the district zoned for General Commercial. As
8 such, the commercial district requires that all lots have an area of at least 15,000 square feet and a
9 minimum width of 100 feet. Proposed Lot 1 has approximately 403,801.2 square feet and is 524.6
10 feet wide; proposed Lot 3 is approximately 61,419.6 square feet and is 235.31 feet wide; and
11 proposed Lot 4 is approximately 61,855.2 square feet and is 244.7 feet wide. Lot 2 is approximately
12 57,499.2 square feet and 179.3 feet wide; Lot 5 is approximately 56,628 square feet and 232.5 feet
13 wide; Lot 6 is approximately 34,412.4 square feet and 121.1 feet wide; and Lot 7 is approximately
14 1,433,559.6 square feet. Lots 2,5,6 and 7 have existing retail uses. According to the preliminary
15 plan, all lots meet the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance for lot size and width.
16 All lots as represented by the preliminary plat appear to have direct access to Silver Lake Road. The
17 developer is proposing to also create reciprocal easements for access,parking and utilities to serve
IP9 the proposed lots and to permit the ultimate retail uses to function as a single shopping center. The
City's attorney has advised that the City should condition any approval of the plat on the City's
20 review and approval of an agreement in recordable form before the plat is signed and released by the
21 City.
22 According to the City's Ordinance, Section 1650.05, adequate parking must be provided and is
23 determined based on the gross floor area of the building on the lot. SuperValu is proposing to build
24 a 75,200 square foot Cub Food store and providing 573 parking spaces. The ordinance requires that
25 there be one space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area. SuperValu, therefore, is required
26 to provide a minimum of 251 parking spaces.
27 The existing business on Lots 2, 5, 6 and 7 currently provide adequate parking. Since the size of the
28 structures to be built on Lots 3 and 4 is unknown at this time, it is not possible to determine the
29 minimum number of parking spaces that would be required under this section of the City Code. This
30 will be evaluated at the time that Ste. Marie Corporation provides the City with the site plans for
31 each of these lots.
32 The proposed Cub Foods building meets the required setback requirements of the City's Ordinance
33 as stated in Section 1635.05. If the subdivision of land is approved, the existing mall building on
34 Lot 7 will not meet the side yard setback requirement of 10 feet. The Ste. Marie Corporation has
35 applied for a sideyard setback variance of 10 feet.
it Duane Grace, Building Inspector for the City, has advised that this "zero-lot line" is acceptable
37 according to the Uniform Building Code, provided that a two-hour rated fire wall be constructed,
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 5
1 a 60 foot right-of-way is maintained between the Cub Foods store and the existing mall, and the
2 sprinkling system is maintained.
3 The City Attorney has suggested that each lot have its own sewer and water connections. Where a
4 lot does not have direct access and connections to the main utilities under Silver Lake Road, or in
5 other public easements, such easements will need to be created either in the plat or as suggested
6 earlier by Mr. Soth, City Attorney, through a reciprocal easement agreement. The Public Works
7 Director has verified that each lot can be served with sewer, water and other necessary utilities.
8 An Environmental Assessment Worksheet has been completed. The City Attorney has advised that
9 until the requirements of the law relating to the Environmental Worksheet are met,the project should
10 not have final approval from the Council.
11 The City Attorney has also advised the City that the existing Declaration of Restrictions filed and
12 recorded a year ago as part of the previous plat approval will be terminated when the new plat is
13 filed. These restrictions are not necessary for the City's protection provided the land is replatted.
14 Title insurance information has been provided by Ste. Marie Corporation as per Mr. Soth's request.
Based on the information provided by Ste. Marie Corporation and the conditions and advice
6 provided by the City Attorney, Staff recommends approval of Ste. Marie Corporation's petition for
17 subdivision of land in order to facilitate the redevelopment of the Apache Shopping Center.
18 Chair Bergstrom requested Mr. Scott to present a brief overview of the subdivision on the site plan.
19 Mr. Scott reviewed the site plan for the audience, and explained the seven lots and three outlots that
20 will be created.
21 Chair Bergstrom asked if the Commission had any questions for Mr. Scott. No questions were
22 raised. Chair Bergstrom asked if the audience had any questions for Mr. Scott. No questions were
23 raised. Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m.
24
25 Motion by Gondorchin, seconded by Thompson, to approve the proposed subdivision for the
26 property known as Apache Plaza as long as all twelve issues identified in a January 24, 1996 letter
27 to the Planning Commission by legal counsel William Soth are resolved by the City of St. Anthony
28 administration.
29 Motion carried unanimously.
30 B. Variance Request for Sideyard Setback - Ste. Marie Company
31
Chair Bergstrom opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. Ms. Moore-Sykes read the staff report:
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 6
1 The Ste. Marie Corporation has submitted a sideyard setback variance request for the existing mall
2 building on the newly created Lot 7, Apache Plaza. The subdivision of land is intended to create
3 several commercial lots which will provide redevelopment opportunities to SuperValu and other
4 potential retailers. The J.C. Penney's portion of the existing mall and the health club will be
5 demolished to allow for the construction of a Cub Foods store. The remaining north portion of the
6 mall will be situated on the newly created property line between Lot 7 and Lot 1. According to the
7 City Zoning Ordinance, Section 1635.05, Subd. 5, interior side yards of commercial buildings are
8 required to be 10 feet in width.
9 In a letter submitted to the City by Jack Amdal, KKE Architects, there are several issues that are
10 particular to Apache Plaza as it currently exists and which are creating redevelopment hardships that
11 has necessitated Ste. Marie Corporation's request for a side yard setback variance of 10 feet. These
12 issues include:
13 1. Ste. Marie Corporation needs to deal with a deteriorating and obsolete shopping
14 center mall which requires significant redevelopment and restructuring activities to
15 bring it to its best and reasonable use as a commercial property.
16 2. A portion of the mall must remain intact because there are a number of existing
4R leases that run for the next several years. In order to accommodate these tenants and
SuperValu's interest in building a Cub Food store, Ste. Marie Corporation proposes
19 to leave most of the mall standing.
20 3. For the safety of the occupants, the structural integrity of the central mall must be
21 maintained. In allowing a side yard set back variance at the renovated north end,the
22 need to restructure the existing roofing system and structure will be eliminated.
23 Also,an emergency exit,which is required by the Uniform Building Code and public
24 restrooms will not be eliminated and access to the mall from the west will remain
25 useable.
26 The granting of a side yard variance for Lot 7 allows for the reasonable use and continued
27 accessibility of the remaining mall,while also enabling planned redevelopment plans for the whole
28 property to move forward.
29 Duane Grace submitted a report to the City upon reviewing plans for the proposed partial demolition
30 of northern portion of the existing mall involving the old J.C. Penney's store. In his report, Mr.
31 Grace advised the City that according to the Uniform Building Code, a zero-lot line for the
32 remaining mall building will be acceptable provided that 1.)a two-hour(2) fire rated area separation
33 wall be constructed to replace that wall that is removed and that this wall be continued at right angles
34 to the east and west of the exterior of the Cub Foods store for an additional five (5) feet in each
direction; 2.) 60 feet of open area be maintained around Cub Foods store and the remaining portion
of the existing mall as is required,with the exception of the northern wall;and 3.)that both buildings
37 will maintain a fully automatic fire suppression systems.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 7
1 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 10 foot side yard
2 variance request made by Ste. Marie Corporation. If the variance is granted, it will not alter the
3 essential character of the property or locality. The variance request was made for the purpose of
4 enhancing the redevelopment of the property to return it to its reasonable and best use.
5 Because the Ste. Marie Corporation acquired this property through the deed in lieu of foreclosure,
6 they did not.create the hardship that has caused them to request the side yard variance.
7 Chair Bergstrom asked for any questions of staff. No questions were raised. Mr. Scott gave an
8 overview of the area for the variance, and stated they were prepared to meet all guidelines of
9 reconstruction of wall and to move forward for Phase 1.
10 Commissioner Gondorchin asked if the zero lot line is approved, what the exterior of the mall will
11 resemble. Mr. Scott responded that plans were not finalized, but it would be comparable to the
12 current Apache Plaza, and would look complete.
13 Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. after no further questions were raised.
14 Motion by Gondorchin, seconded by Franzese,to approve 10 foot sideyard/zero lot line request for
0 the property known as Apache Plaza, Lot 7, based on the following rationale:
16 1. Strict enforcement of existing codes would cause undue hardship preventing the
17 redevelopment of a deteriorating and obsolete structure.
18 2. Ste. Marie Corporation acquired the property through the deed in lieu of foreclosure,
19 and the mall must remain intact and operational to honor leases of existing tenants.
20 The circumstances are unique and not created by the individual.
21 3. Granting of the variance will not alter the character of the area and makes sound
22 economic sense for the City of St. Anthony.
23 4. The wall to be constructed on the lot line, endorsed by Building Official Duane C.
24 Grace,will be constructed conforming to the Uniform Building Code, Section 504.6.
25 See letter dated December 27, 1995 addressed to Larry Hamer representing the City
26 of St. Anthony and Jack Amdal, Vice President of KKE Architects.
27 Motion carried unanimously.
28
29 V. OTHER ITEMS.
A. Review Comprehensive Sign Plan
31 Ms. Moore-Sykes read the staff report:
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 8
1 The Ste. Marie Corporation, owner of the Apache Plaza Shopping Center has submitted plans to the
2 City of St. Anthony that is virtually the.same as the Comprehensive Sign Plan that was originally
3 submitted in November, 1994.
4 The difference between this proposed sign package and the one that the Planning Commission
5 recommended for approval in 1994 is that Ste. Marie Corporation and OPUS are proposing to have
6 up to five (5) ground signs. A ground sign is being requested for lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
7 By submitting a comprehensive sign package, exceptions to the regulations of the sign ordinance
8 may be permitted. The purpose of providing this exception is to recognize that because of the size
9 of the current mall and the proposed redevelopment of additional retail areas, i.e., Cub Foods,the
10 " size and number of signs will be greater than is allowed by the City's Sign Ordinance.
11 This exception also gives the Planning Commission and the City Council the flexibility that enables
12 them to look at the overall concept and make exceptions to the ordinance.
13 Chair Bergstrom asked for any questions of staff. Mr. Scott gave an overview of the proposed sign
14 package, stating OPUS agrees that signs would be eight feet in height, but is requesting a variance
15 of size,requesting 64 square feet per side. He continued the proposed center wide pylon sign would
be north of the current pylon,42 feet high,and that it agrees with the specifications approved in the
'r7 1994 package. He continued that identifying Apache Plaza is a key issue, and that building signage
18 may vary slightly, but not greatly.
19 Mr. Scott explained all signage will conform to approved lettering,contain no neon or lighted signs,
20 etc. Mr. Scott presented renderings of proposed signage, stating they were attractive with brick and
21 stucco. He noted the signage size is important for the success of the tenants and the mall, and that
22 most cities allow more. Mr. Scott continued they were not requesting extraordinary sizes, but were
23 preparing for the requests that will come from tenants.
24 Chair Bergstrom explained for the audience the sign sizes in the originally approved package would
25 be similar to the TCF Bank sign,while this size would be slightly lower,similar to the Hardee's sign.
26 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired where the pylon sign would be placed. Mr. Scott responded it
27 would be placed slightly north of the current pylon.
28 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the landscaping has been finalized. Mr. Scott responded it
29 was not finalized yet, but would be minimal along Silver Lake Road to give as much visibility for
30 tenants to traffic.
31 Commissioner Horst.stated his concern the current signs at Tires Plus,Taco Bell,and First Bank will
be different from the proposed sign package. Mr. Scott responded if those companies are interested
they would like to change their signage to be consistent, but stated there would be a cost involved.
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 9
1 Commissioner Horst inquired how the new pylon sign could be flexible now, as tenants are coming
2 to the project, they may want different signage. Mr. Scott responded they would not be changing
3 the sign now because the cost would be too high; they pylon sign would suffice for the time. He
4 continued the sign package would be a marketing tool in leasing to ensure potential tenants a positive
5 sign package is in place.
6 Chair Bergstrom asked if the monument sign is approved,will OPUS create and build the sign now.
7 Mr. Scott responded they are only requesting approval for construction for a consistent approved
8 package. Chair Bergstrom verified the intent is to create an opportunity for signage, but not a
9 guarantee. Mr. Scott replied that was correct.
10 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the Cub Foods proposed sign would be eight or 15 feet in
11 height. Mr. Scott replied the Cub Foods pylon is proposed for 30 feet, similar to the other Cub
12 Foods stores. Commissioner Gondorchin stated the eight foot height would apply to Lots 3, 4, 5,
13 and 6.
14 Commissioner Franzese inquired how the proposed Cub Foods sign compares to other store's signs.
15 Craig Nevissen, SuperValu, responded it would be a typical pylon sign, 30 feet high with a 10x13
16 foot panel. He continued the material was panaflex, interior illuminated, and would be consistent
with the mall. He offered a portfolio of photos for the Commission to review.
18 Commissioner Franzese inquired how it compared with other Cub Foods signs. Mr. Nevissen
19 replied it would be consistent with the other signs.
20 Commissioner Thompson inquired if Tires Plus and First Bank can receive ground signs if they
21 request one. Mr. Scott replied he has not had any conversations as of yet with tenants, so he is
22 unaware of any requests. He continued they would work to meet their requests for a consistent look.
23 Commissioner Franzese inquired how the ground sign sizes were determined. Mr. Scott replied it
24 was determined based on discussions with staff on what would likely be acceptable. He reiterated
25 the proposed size is relatively smaller than other cities, but would be adequate and would create an
26 aesthetic curbside appeal.
27 Mr. Doug Jones, 2505 Silver Lake Road, inquired if OPUS felt there was a need for additional
28 signage on Stinson Boulevard to direct traffic, as well as the orientation of the signs. Mr. Scott
29 responded OPUS would be willing to explore additional signage for efficient flow of traffic by
30 adding entry and directional signs.
31 Mr. Jones inquired if the Commission felt additional signage is necessary on Stinson Boulevard.
32 Chair Bergstrom responded the Commission normally responds to applicants' requests, and no
request was made. He continued he did not see it being detrimental to the City. Mr. Jones continued
*4 he is concerned about increased traffic and felt the Commission should be proactive and make a
35 recommendation to allow for this additional traffic. He continued that new people would be driving
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
• January 30, 1996
Page 10
1 in the area, and would need additional signage for Cub at the rear of Cub as 50 percent of customers
2 would enter by Stinson.
3 Commissioner Horst stated if the proposed center remains as it is planned, signage would be
4 adequate. He continued if future plans are realized, signage would need to be increased.
5 Mr. Jones reiterated that people will enter Cub from Stinson. Mr. Scott responded he would be
6 unsure of sign placement, and is likely a right-of-way. He continued he would be willing to address
7 the need if it arises.
8 Commissioner Franzese indicated a stop sign is located at 39th and Stinson, and when a traffic light
9 may be added. Mr. Hamer responded that weather permitting, they will begin installation of the
10 lights in the Spring of 1996.
11 Commissioner Gondorchin indicated he did not want to discount additional signage, but felt
12 SuperValu's judgement should be respected.
13 Commissioner Franzese asked for clarification of current wall signs and how it coincides with the
14 proposed package. Mr.Hamer stated City ordinance allows two square feet of wall signage for every
9 lineal foot, and if in conformance could be dictated in color, size, etc.
16 Motion by Gondorchin, seconded by Franzese,to recommend Comprehensive Sign Plan for Apache
17 Plaza.
18 Motion carried unanimously.
19 Chair Bergstrom stated this concluded the official business,and inquired if there were any questions
20 from the audience that could be addressed.
21 Commissioner Franzese invited the audience to come forward to see the site plans and renderings,
22 and stated Mr. Scott would be available to answer questions.
23 Mr. Jones inquired when the Rice Creek Watershed hearing would be held. Mr. Mornson indicated
24 a date had not been set. Mr. Jones inquired when the TIF hearing was scheduled. Mr. Mornson
25 stated it would be discussed at the City Council's regular meeting, but not as a public hearing. He
26 anticipated it would be on the next month's agenda.
27 VI. ADJOURNMENT.
�28 Motion by Franzese, seconded by Thompson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:31 p.m.
�l0 Motion carried unanimously.
31
Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes
January 30, 1996
Page 11
1 Respectfully submitted,
2 Cathy Sorensen
3 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
•
•