HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 11182003 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII �.
102901
Box: 27
Folder: PL PACKETS 2000-2004
Document: PL PACKET 11182003
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER 18, 2003
7 p.m., Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC INPUT
Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any item not included on the regular
agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, state their name and address for the
Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five-minutes. - -
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
6. MEETING MINUTES
6.1 Review and Approve Planning Commission Minutes of October 21, 2003
7. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL
7.1 Designate a Planning Commission Member to the November 25, 2003 City Council
Meeting
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.1 Amend Zoning Code to Allow Adult Day Care Centers as Conditional Uses in Light
Industrial.Districts
8.2 Apache Redevelopment, LLC, Silver Lane to the north; Silver Lake Road to the east;
Soo Line Railroad Right-of-Way to the south; and Stinson Boulevard to the west, rezone
the above-referenced property from Commercial to Planned Unit Development
9. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS
11. ADJOURNMENT
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 21, 2003
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
4
5 October 21, 2003
6 7:00 p.m.
7
8
9 I. CALL TO ORDER.
10 Chair Melsha called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
11
12 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
13 Chair Melsha invited the Council and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
14
15 III. ROLL CALL.
16 Commissioners present: Chair Melsha; Vice Chair Stille; Commissioners Hanson,
17 Hoska, Steeves, Stromgren and Tillman.
18
19 Absent: None.
20
21 Also present: Assistant City Manager Susan Hall; Greg Brock, LaNel Financial
22 Group; Jim Crockeril Representing St. Anthony Shopping Center;
23 Michael Wagner, Owner
24
25 IV. PUBLIC INPUT.
26
27 No one stepped forward.
28
29 V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
30
31 Motion by Commissioner Stromgren, second by Commissioner Hoska, to approve the meeting
32 agenda as presented.
33
34 Motion carried unanimously.
35
36 VI. MEETING MINUTES.
37 6.1 Review and Approval - Planning Commission Minutes of September 16, 2003.
38
39 Commissioner Stromgren stated he had corrections. He noted:
40 Page 11, lines 4 and 7 reference KKV, it should be BKV.
41
42 Vice Chair Stille stated that he had a correction. He noted:
43 Page 11, line twenty-two instead of`area medium income' it should state `average mean income'.
44
45 Motion by Commissioner Hanson, second by Commissioner Hoska, to approve the Planning
46 Commission meeting minutes of September 16, 2003 as amended.
I Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
2 October 21, 2003
3 Page 2
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5
6 VII. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL.
7 7.1 Designate a Planning Commission member to the October 28, 2003 City Council
8 Meeting.
9
10 Chair Melsha noted that Commissioner Steeves has indicated that he would be available to
11 attend the next City Council meeting on October 28, 2003.
12
13 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
14 8.1 Autumn Woods II, LLP, 2534, 2538, 2542, 2546 and 2548 Kenzie Terrace, amend
15 Planned Unit Development(PUD) for an additional 38 units of adult rental housing.
16
17 Chair Melsha opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m.
18
19 Susan Hall stated that on July 25, 2003, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the
20 Autumn Woods II Planned Unit Development(PUD) amendment and recommended City
21 Council approval subject to there being 38 parking stalls rather than the 35 proposed; review of.
22 the plans and cross easements by the City Attorney; and completion of the replat. She stated that
23 on July 22, 2003 the City Council approved the PL-D amendment with the conditions
24 recommended by the Planning Commission. She stated that after the approvals Staff learned that
25 some of the neighbors of the development had not been notified of the July 15`h Public Hearing,
26 as they should have. She noted that Mr. Brewer opted to have a rehearing so that these
27 neighbors would have an opportunity to speak and provide input to the development. She
28 provided the Commission with a brief overview of the development details stating that the
29 developer has proposed an excellent fit with the adjacent Autumn Woods development. She
30 further stated that Staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment.
31
32 Chair Melsha confirmed that the July Planning Commission and City Council meeting minutes
33 and all information has been incorporated for a complete review of the information.
34
35 Vice Chair Stille noted that the resolution approval was conditional upon the lot split and cross
36 easements and asked if this had occurred yet. Ms. Hall confirmed that it has not happened yet.
37
38 Greg Brock, Partner, LaNel Financial Group, stated that he is available for any questions the
39 Commission or residents might have regarding the proposed development. He referenced a
40 change from the last set of plans stating that they initially requested approval for 35 underground
41 parking stalls noting that it has been amended for a total of 38 parking stalls. He reviewed the
42 access points and provided an overview of the project to the Commission. He stated that they
43 intend to maintain the same type of architecture as the Autumn Woods I development adding
44 that it would be more upscale and include amenities such as fireplaces and washer and dryers in
45 some units.
46
47 Barbara Sullivan, 2005 22nd Avenue Northeast, referenced Rule 350 stating that the residents
48 should have been notified. She asked the Commission why they did not receive notification of
49 this project.
50
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 21, 2003
Page 3
1 Chair Melsha acknowledged Ms. Sullivan's concerns and explained that it was an oversight that
2 they did not receive the appropriate notification. He reviewed the PUD with the residents
3 present and clarified that the PUD could be changed or amended depending on the input received
4 from the hearing.
5
6 Ms. Sullivan asked if an environmental impact study had been done prior to the project being
7 approved. She expressed concerns regarding the environmental impact with respect to
8 stormwater runoff and groundwater. She noted that for every five acres a holding pond should
9 be incorporated and asked if this would be done for the Autumn Woods II project. She strongly
10 encouraged the Commission to consider all issues with respect to the environmental impact of
11 the area.
12
13 Ms. Hall stated that the Engineer has reviewed the site and is not concerned about the issues Ms.
14 Sullivan raised. She frther explained the scope of the project noting that an EAW is not
15 necessary for a project of this size.
16
17 Mr. Brock noted that Phase I had an analysis done of the area that included drilling samples. He
18 stated that no issues were found at that time.
19
20 Mark Gibbs, 2617 Lowry, asked if they would be installing some type of barrier between the
21 houses and the project area. He asked if they would be installing a fence. He expressed
22 concerns stating that they do not want any unnecessary traffic into their yards. He noted that last
23 year he was approached by the developer with an offer to purchase his property and asked if they
24 would be coming back with any further offers. He stated that it was his understanding that the
25 City had pulled back the funding to purchase their property. He explained that he had signed a
26 purchase agreement for another home thinking he had sold his property and asked if the
27 developer still intended to purchase their property.
28
29 Mr. Brock addressed Mr. Gibbs concerns regarding the barrier. He referenced the landscaping
30 plans stating that the plans include a heavily treed and bermed area between the houses and the
31 development. He added that the plans do not include fencing. He addressed Mr. Gibbs
32 questions regarding the purchase of his property stating that acquisition of his property was
33 dependent upon the ability for the development to purchase all five properties along Lowry
34 Avenue NE and not portions of the area. He explained that had they been able to acquire all of
35 the properties it would have allowed further development of the area noting that not all
36 homeowners wanted to sell their property. He stated that in reviewing costs to purchase the
37 properties that were available they found that it would have cost too much. He stated that this
38 was the reason for their withdrawal of the offer, not because the City pulled back dollars.
39 -
40 Glen Gavic, 2605 Lowry Avenue, referenced the fencing stating that he agrees with Mr. Gibbs
41 that they should install a fence between their properties and the development. He also noted that
42 money had been offered for their property that was up to three times the market value and
43 expressed his frustration and disappointment noting that they never heard another word from the
44 developer. He asked the Commission who was in charge of this process.
45
I Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
2 October 21, 2003
3 Page 4
4
5 Chair Melsha addressed Mr. Gavic's concerns and explained that the Planning Commission has
6 no decision power with respect to land acquisition.
7
8 Vice Chair Stille agreed with Chair Melsha and suggested that Mr. Gavic discuss his concerns
9 with those who did not want to sell their property.
10
11 Chair Melsha further clarified that in order for the acquisition to be worthwhile they needed to
12 be able to purchase a certain amount of land mass. He explained that this was not accomplished
13 based on the fact there was one property owner that did not want to sell their property.
14
15 Mr. Gavic expressed his disagreement stating that the Planning Commission is responsible to
16 work with the neighbors that surround the project area. Chair Melsha agreed that the Planning
17 Commission should work with the residents and acknowledged their request for fencing and
18 their concern regarding the water runoff. He clarified that both of these issues would be
19 Planning Commission concerns adding that land acquisition is not. He clarified that land
20 acquisition is a private party matter between the property owner and the developer and that it
21 does not involve the Planning Commission.
22
23 Commissioner Tillman further clarified that land acquisition is not part of the City planning
24 process adding that it is a developer issue.
25
26 . Mr. Gavic suggested that the City Planners work with the Residents to determine the impact it
27 would have on their neighborhood.
28
29 John Sullivan, 2005 22nd Avenue Northeast, asked if they were changing the zoning from Single
30 Family. Chair Melsha clarified the PUD amendment adding that it would not affect any of the
31 current homes,just the new properties to be developed.
32
33 Chair Melsha closed the public hearing at 7:29 p.m.
34
35 Chair Melsha acknowledged the frustrations expressed by the residents. He reviewed the issues
36 regarding the land acquisition concerns and clarified that this issue is outside the City process
37 and referred further questions to the developer. He stated that he is comfortable with the
38 proposed development and stated that he is satisfied with the buffer and stormwater issues.
39
40 Commissioner Hanson suggested polling the residents for fence separation.
41
42 Commissioner Tillman clarified that the fencing would be instead of the landscaping, not in
43 addition to it.
44
45 Mr. Brock reviewed the landscaping proposal stating that they have done this kind of buffer in
46 other areas adding that they have found that benning,heavily treed areas and shrubs work well
47 as a natural barrier and are easier to maintain than fencing.
48
49 Vice Chair Stille acknowledged Mr. Gavic's concerns and frustrations with respect to the land
50 acquisition issues and reviewed. He suggested discussing his concerns with the developer.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 21, 2003
Page 5
1 Chair Melsha agreed noting that the resident's comments have been duly noted. He stated that
2 he is comfortable with the plan as presented.
3
4 Mr. Gibbs disagreed with the proposed landscaping stating that he would prefer fencing. He
5 expressed concerns regarding safety of the neighborhood adding that he was also concerned
6 about additional pedestrian traffic. Mr. Gavic agreed adding that he is concerned about the
7 additional pedestrian traffic through their yards.
8
9 Commissioner Stromgren asked Mr. Gavic and Mr. Gibbs where the traffic would come from.
10 Mr. Gavic stated that they are concerned about additional pedestrian traffic coming from the
11 streets and surrounding area.
12
13 Chair Melsha noted the Residents request for fencing adding that he felt that the landscaping was
14 the better choice for the area. He noted the line of vision stating that the taller trees would
15 provide a level of privacy. The Residents acknowledged the line of vision adding that there is
16 also an added concern with respect to a possible increase in pedestrian traffic through their
17 yards. The Residents expressed concerns regarding the safety in the area in addition to privacy
18 issues.
19
20 Chair Tillman noted that the landscaping plan calls for deciduous trees,which would eventually
21 be very large trees, as tall as a building. She asked if they were asking for a fence only or a
22 fence with the landscaping. She expressed concerns that there would not be enough room for
23 both. The Residents asked if it would be possible to have both. Chair Melsha suggested having
24 the developer review the plans to determine what could be included as a barrier and leave the
25 final decision to the developer's discretion. He stated that he is comfortable with the proposal as
26 it is.
27 Vice Chair Stille stated that in the long run, landscaping would be more appealing. He noted
28 that the consensus of the residents is that they would prefer fencing.
29
30 Ms. Sullivan asked who would be responsible for maintaining the fencing and the landscaping.
31 Chair Melsha stated that it would be the responsibility of the developer.
32
33 Motion by Chair Melsha, second by Vice Chair Stille, to recommend approval of the PUD as
34 presented, as amended with the additional 38 parking stalls, conditional on the approval and
35 reviewal of plans by the City Attorney, Condition of the Replat and with the condition that the
36 landscape plan, as proposed, can be amended at the discretion of the applicant in lieu of the
37 south end of the property to provide a fence.
38
39 Motion carried unanimously.
40 IX. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION.
41
42 9.1 St. Anthony Shopping Center,LLC, 2900 Pentagon Drive, Continuation of Public
43 Hearing to Amend Comprehensive Sign Plan.
44
45 Susan Hall stated as requested at the September 16''Planning Commission meeting, the St.
46 Anthony Shopping Center has presented sign criteria to address logo signage for their
1 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
2 October 21, 2003
3 Page 6
4
5 comprehensive sign plan. She explained this is unfinished business from the September 161
6 Public Hearing in the applicant's efforts to update their comprehensive sign plan. She noted
7 the Shopping Center has been attending the Planning Commission and City Council
8 meetings since August to address the need and implementation of logo signs. She noted the
9 St. Anthony Shopping Center recently signed leases with two tenants that have regional and
10 national scope, Bumper to Bumper and Subway. She explained that the current
11 comprehensive sign plan does not provide sufficient flexibility of sign design to
12 accommodate regional and national tenants that have logo signage for all locations. She
13 reviewed stating that at the last Planning Commission meeting it was recommended to the
14 City Council that yellow lettering be added into the comprehensive sign plan for approval to
15 allow Subway to put up their sign adding that it was decided that the remaining issues
16 surrounding the logos would be addressed at a future meeting once the applicant presented
17 the City with proposed language. She reviewed the proposed language for the logo signage
18 with the Commission. She noted several other issues that should be addressed stating that
19 the Subway logo sign also includes white lettering and suggested that this color should be
20 included into the sign criteria. She noted the temporary banner above the Bumper to
21 Bumper appears to take up more than it's share of the wall and asked that this be reviewed.
22 She noted that the El Ray Bakery has had a temporary sign for quite some time and that they
23 have not pulled a sign permit yet. She asked what their plans are for permanent signage.
24 She explained that the question for the Planning Commission is whether the proposed
25 language for logo signage addresses the issues raised over the last couple of months. She
26 suggested that the Planning Commission ensure that the parameters are in place to ensure
27 consistency.
28
29 Commissioner Tillman asked if specified height and percentage of space used in front was
30 clarified in the proposal.
31
32 Commissioner Stromgren noted the City Council objections had to do with the size. Ms.
33 Hall suggested clarifying the size of the signage with Bumper to Bumper.
34
35 Jim Crockeril Co-Owner-St. Anthony Shopping Center, LLC stated that he touched base with
36 eleven of the fifteen tenants to determine whether there were any issues with the proposed
37 language. He stated that no one had any issues. He reviewed, noting that 50% or less would be
38 backlit signs adding that they are quite attractive.
39
40 Chair Melsha asked if they expected any other large tenants besides Bumper to Bumper or
41 Subway that could have logo issues. Mr. Crockeril clarified that typically the tenants are local
42 merchants who do not have logos to display adding that he does not expect any other large
43 tenants.
44
45 Vice Chair Stille asked Mr. Crockeril if he brought any examples for the Commission to review.
46 Mr. Crockeril stated that the examples had been provided in a previous package and that he did
47 not have anything that has changed.
48
49 Mr. Crockeril reviewed the comments from City Council regarding the backlighting in addition
50 to Council concerns that the sign is inconsistent with the rest of the tenant. He explained that
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 21, 2003
Page 7
1 due to Council concerns Bumper to Bumper has agreed, as a compromise, to the channel-style
2 lettering with their logo located on each side and reviewed the changes with the Commission.
3
4 Commissioner Stromgren suggested including language that clarifies that no single or double
5 logo sign could be larger than 25%. Mr. Crockeril stated that this would be consistent with
6 Bumper to Bumper's expectation and reviewed with the Commission.
7
8 Commissioner Tillman stated that there is nothing in the language that includes the color white
9 and suggested including it within the language changes. Chair Melsha stated that the addressed
10 the colors at the last meeting and reviewed the discussion with the Commission.
11
12 Chair Tillman noted that the approved colors were red and blue stating that they agreed to
13 include yellow. She suggested adding white for clarification. Mr. Crockeril stated that he would
14 be satisfied with the five colors, red, blue, orange, green and yellow. Chair Melsha agreed that
15 they should include white on the list of acceptable colors.
16
17 Vice Chair Stille asked Mr. Crockeril how important it is for Bumper to Bumper to have
18 repetition of the logo on each side of the sign. Mr. Crockeril explained that it is very important
19 to have the logo at each side, as it is consistent with the design they use nationwide.
20
21 Chair Melsha suggested incorporating into the language that a sign could not have more than two
22 logos at 25% each in size and that it is not to exceed 20 square feet.
23
24 Mr. Crockeril assured the Commission that they do not expect any other large tenants.
25
26 Commissioner Steeves stated that he is very comfortable with Chair Melsha and Commissioner
27 Stromgren's suggestion of 25% for each logo with the 20 square foot restriction.
28
29 Vice Chair Stille explained that they are trying to establish continuity within the community. He
30 referenced the El Way Bakery sign and asked when they plan to be in compliance. Mr.
31 Crockeril assured the Commission stating that he would follow up with the Bakery adding that
32 they would be in compliance very soon.
33
34 Commissioner Stromgren asked if there is a time limit for temporary signs in the ordinance. Mr.
35 Crockeril explained that it is outlined in the lease and that it is up to them to enforce compliance.
36 Ms. Hall clarified that they have a 30-day time limit for temporary signs. She reviewed the sign
37 criteria with the Commission and suggested monitoring the timeframe for Bumper to Bumper.
38
39 Motion by Commissioner Stromgren, second by Commissioner Hoska to recommend
40 approval of the amendment of the St Anthony Shopping Center Comprehensive Sign Plan,
41 dated October 2, 2003 with the following changes: 1. That the proposed language be
42 amended to read up to two logo signs per tenant be allowed. 2. That each logo sign cannot
43 exceed 25% of the surface face area and that each logo sign cannot exceed 20 square feet in
44 certain space area. 3. Add language that any temporary signage must also comply with the
45 maximum area sign,criteria. 4. To amend to allow white lettering, consistent in color with
46
I Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
2 October 21, 2003
3 Page 8
4
5 the Subway sign. 5. The amendment of approval is to be subject to all tenants being in
6 compliance with the sign plan and all other applicable City ordinances regarding signage.
7
8 Motion carried unanimously
9
10 X. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION.
11
12 10.1 Adult Day Care in Industrial.Zoning District
13
14 Susan Hall stated that Michael Wagner, owner of the professional building located at 2924
15 Anthony Lane North, has approached City Staff regarding an adult day care center to be located
16 in his building. She explained that the building is located in a light industrial zoning district and
17 that Mr. Wagner is requesting an amendment to the ordinance to allow the adult daycare in a
18 light industrial location. She explained that a potential client who has an interest in the building
19 has approached Mr. Wagner. She explained that currently, adult day care is permitted in the
20 Commercial zoning district as a permitted conditional use. She stated that Mr. Wagner and his
21 client have asked Staff if this request could be expedited. She reviewed with the Commission
22 the process Mr. Wagner would take with the Commission/City Council to advance his request.
23
24 Michael Wagner, Owner, 2924 Anthony Lane North explained that the building is located in a
25 light industrial area, specifically the old Pratt-Whitney building. He stated that the building was
26 built in 1982 and includes handicapped access points. He explained that the proposed use for the
27 building would be very compatible adding that it would not affect current property values as it
28 provides a service to the community. He asked the Commission to consider and approve his
29 request for the amendment.
30
31 Commissioner Stromgren asked for clarification on the location of the building. Mr. Wagner
32 clarified that the building is located at County Road C and Anthony Lane. He noted the location
33 on the City map for the Commission.
34
35 Chair Melsha explained that they have allowed adult day care in the commercial zoning district
36 because they also allow child daycare. He further explained that his concern, if they approve the
37 zoning change, is that it would affect every industrial zoned property. He acknowledged that the
38 service could be compatible for this particular location adding that it may not be conducive in
39 another area.
40
41 Mr. Wagner explained that his client looks for specific types of buildings for this type of service
42 and reviewed their criteria with the Commission. He further explained that the State would also
43 be involved in the review process and clarified State restrictions for the Commission.
44
45 Melsha asked Ms. Hall what the next step in the process would be. Ms. Hall explained that they
46 would schedule a Public Hearing with the Planning Commission for an amendment to the
47 ordinance. She stated that if the Planning Commission is in agreement with the proposal Mr.
48 Wagner is then requesting a Public Hearing to be scheduled in November with the intent to apply
49 for a Conditional Use Permit.
50
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
October 21, 2003
Page 9
1 Commissioner Stromgren asked for further clarification of the Conditional Use Permit process.
2 He also asked if the Planning Commission is specifically bound by the criteria or do they have
3 some leeway in considering this specific request. Ms. Hall stated that they are not specifically
4 bound by the criteria and reviewed the process with the Commission.
5
6 Chair Melsha stated that he is comfortable with Mr. Wagner's request for a public hearing.
7
8 Mr. Wagner clarified his understanding of the process and asked if City Staff would be in
9 contact with him to assist him with filling out the conditional use application. Chair Melsha
10 stated that City Staff would be available to help him through the process and reviewed with Mr.
11 Wagner.
12
13 Ms. Hall confirmed with Mr. Wagner that he is requesting a public hearing, to be held in
14 November, to discuss an ordinance amendment adding adult day care as a conditional use in the
15 light industrial area. Mr. Wagner confirmed that he is requesting a public hearing to be held in
16 November. He stated that he has received the letter outlining the process to take and assured the
17 Commission that he would be present at the next Commission meeting.
18
19 Commissioner Stromgren suggested that Mr. Wagner include the Nurse Aids and provide fiu-ther
20 information for the next Planning Commission meeting.
21
22 Mr. Wagner asked if the owner/operator of the business should attend the meetings. Chair
23 Melsha confirmed that they should also be in attendance.
24
25 Commissioner Steeves stated that he would like to know what factors the State considers. He
26 explained that it would help him to better understand and decide. Mr. Wagner stated that he
27 would research and provide the information for the Commissioner's review.
28
29 Commissioner Tillman asked Mr. Wagner to include information that would show how common
30 these facilities are in a light industrial area. Mr. Wagner stated that he would research and
31 provide information for the Commission's review.
32
33 10.2 Opinion Sims in Residentially Zoned Districts
34
35 Vice Chair Stille stated that earlier this summer the Commission discussed issues regarding the
36 posting of opinion signs. He explained that they have been reviewing the ordinances and plan to
37 provide an update on the Sub-Committee activities and findings at the November meeting. He
38 stated that he would have a more specific report available at that time for discussion.
39
40 XI. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
41 Ms. Hall stated that the Commissioners Letter of Intent for their term is due by November 24,
42 2003. She stated that the interviews would take place on December 8, 2003.
43
44 Commissioner Hanson asked Commissioner Steeves to update the City Council regarding the
45 residents affected by the LaNel/Autumn Woods II project. He asked if LaNel has any plans for a
46
I Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
2 October 21, 2003
3 Page 10
4
5 Phase III. He requested an update on the KFCNideo Update location and also asked if LaNel
6 would be interested in the location for expansion.
7
8 Ms. Hall noted that Sprint has expressed interest in placing an antenna on their water tower and
9 reviewed the request with the Commission.
10
11 XII. ADJOURNMENT
12
13 Motion by Commissioner Hoska, second by Commissioner Tillman, to adjourn the meeting at
14 8:25 p.m.
15
16 Motion carried unanimously.
17
18 Respectfully submitted,
19
20
21 Bonnie Sullivan
22 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
23
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 11/10/03 MEETING DATE: 11/18/03
TO: Chair Melsha & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Managerd1d
SUBJECT: Adult Day Care in Light Industrial District
Overview:
Last month, Michael Wagner, who owns a professional office building at 2924 Anthony
Lane North, approached the Planning Commission about having an adult day care
center in his building. An adult day care center has approached him about leasing space
in his building. At this time, adult day care is only allowed in the Commercial zoning
district as a conditional use, per an adopted ordinance resolution earlier this year.
As 'a first step in the process, the Planning Commission set a public hearing on
November 18 to consider an amendment to the zoning code to allow adult day care
centers as a conditional use in the Light Industrial district.
One of the concerns to be addressed is what the State looks at when reviewing sites for
adult day care as well as what the differences are between Commercial and Light
Industrial zoning districts in terms of allowed uses in light of this request.
Requested Action:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take public comment on the zoning
amendment. Attached please find ordinance language if the Planning Commission
recommends moving ahead with the change. The recommendation will be considered
by the City Council on November 25. An ordinance change typically requires three
readings at the City Council level for adoption.
Attachment:
• Adult Day Care amendment language
DRAFT- Potential Language for Amendment—DRAFT
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1640.03 OF THE ST. ANTHONY ZONING
CODE TO ALLOW ADULT DAY CARE CENTERS AS CONDITIONAL USES IN
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS
Section 1640.03 of the City's Zoning Code is amended to add the following use as a
permitted conditional use within a general light industrial district(LI district);
(h)Adult Day Care Centers, licensed under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 245A and
Minnesota Rules, Sections 9555.9600 to 9555.9730.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 11/10/03 MEETING DATE: 11/18/03
TO: Chair Melsha & Planning Commission Members
FROM: Susan M.H. Hall, Assistant City Manage
�p
SUBJECT: Rezone Apache Redevelopment Area from Commercial to
Planned Unit Development
Overview:
On September 16, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the
preliminary concept plan and plat and final retail plan and plat for the Apache
Redevelopment area generally bounded by Silver Lane on the north, Silver Lake Road
on the east, the Soo Line Railroad Right-of-Way on the south, and Stinson Boulevard on
the west.
On September 23, the City Council approved the overall concept plan and plat as well
as the final retail plan. The Council adopted Resolution 03-081 approving the documents
and adopted findings of fact and conditions of approval.
On November 18, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to formally
consider the rezoning of the property from Commercial to Planned Unit Development
(PUD). Please see attached memorandum from John Shardlow of Dahlgren, Shardlow
and Uban (DSU) for more information.
Also attached please find recent communication received into city offices from Canadian
Pacific Railway.
Requested Action:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance
rezoning the subject property from Commercial to PUD, pursuant to the findings of fact
and conditions of approval made by the City Council in Resolution 03-081 dated
September 23, 2003.
Attachments:
• 11/18/03 DSU Memorandum
• City Council Resolution 03-081
• 11/4/03 Canadian Pacific Letter/Brochure
wcoavoanren
CONSULTING PLANNERS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH
SUITE 210
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
612.3393300
DATE: November 18, 2003
TO: City of St. Anthony Village Planning Commission
FROM: John W. Shardlow, AICP, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, Inc.
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Approve an Ordinance Rezoning the Village at St. Anthony
site from Commercial to Planned Unit Development District(PUD)
LOCATION: Property Commonly Known as Apache Plaza Mall, generally bounded by Silver
Lane on the north, Silver Lake Road on the east, the Soo Line Railroad Right-
of-Way on the south, and Stinson Boulevard on the west.
APPLICANT: Apache Redevelopment, LLC
BACKGROUND
On September 16, 2003, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review an application
for the Village at St. Anthony PUD and to consider approval of the Preliminary Development
Plan and Plat for the entire site and the Final Development Plan and Plat for the retail portion of
the property. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to
recommend that the City Council approve the application.
On September 23, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution 03-81 approving the Preliminary
Development Plan and Preliminary Plat for the entire project area and the Final Development
Plan and Final plat for the retail portion, and adopted findings of fact and conditions of approval.
On November 18, 2003, the Planning Commission will conduct another public hearing to
formally consider the rezoning of the property from Commercial to PUD. This public hearing is
simply a housekeeping matter to address the fact although approval of the PUD plan inherently
included a rezoning of the subject property from Commercial to PUD, neither the public notice
for the September 16 public hearing nor Resolution 03-81 definitively stated that a rezoning
would occur through the action taken on the preliminary and final development plans and plats.
Given the complexity of this project and its significance to community, a new public hearing has
been noticed to clearly state that a rezoning is being considered. This is a complicated project to
finance and lenders need to be assured that the property has been rezoned to an appropriate
category that authorizes the development. Title companies typically search community records
CADocuments and Settings\shenry\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1es\0LK6\PC report 11-18.doc
City of St.Anthony Village Planning Commission
November 18, 2003
Page 2
to find specific records documenting a rezoning. Therefore, in order to facilitate review by the
title company and eliminate any ambiguity, the Planning Commission is being asked to consider
a formal ordinance rezoning the subject property from Commercial to PUD.
The ordinance is attached to this memo for the Planning Commission's review. Also attached to
this memo is City Council Resolution 03-81, which includes specific findings of fact in support
of the rezoning and PUD approval. This resolution should be incorporated by reference as part
of the Planning Commission approval of the ordinance granting the rezoning.
ATTACHMENTS
• Ordinance Approving a Rezoning from Commercial to PUD
• City Council Resolution 03-81 containing findings of fact
1 •
That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the ordinance rezoning
the subject property from Commercial to PUD, pursuant to the findings of fact and conditions of
approval made by the City Council in Resolution 03-81 dated September 23, 2003.
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE,MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF
THE CITY CODE,BEING THE ZONING AND LAND USE CHAPTER OF THE
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY VILLAGE
CASE FILE
The City Council of the City of St.Anthony Village ordains as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 16 of the City of St. Anthony Village Code is hereby amended to rezone to Planned
Unit Development, in accordance with the Planned Unit Development Agreement on file in the City
Clerk's office dated , 2003, the following described property located within the City of
St.Anthony Village, Minnesota.
Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1 and Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 and that part of Apache Lane, lying southerly of
the southerly Right-of-Way of 39th Avenue N.E. and that part of 38th Avenue N.E. lying easterly of the
easterly right-of-way of Stinson Boulevard, all in the plat of APACHE PLAZA, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota; Lots 5 and 7, Block 1, Outlots A and C, and that part
of 39th Avenue N.E., lying easterly of the southerly extension of the west line of said Lot 7, all in the plat
of SILVER LAKE CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County Minnesota; Lot 2,
Block 1, BEUTZ ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County Minnesota; Lots 1
and 2, Block 1, HUEBSCH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County
Minnesota; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, PILLSBURY ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Ramsey County Minnesota.
Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of St. Anthony Village referred to and described in said Chapter
16, shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the City Manager or his designee shall
appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the City Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the
rezoning provided for in this Ordinance and all of the notations, references and other information shown
thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to
law.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS day of , 2003, by the City Council of the
City of St. Anthony Village.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
By:
Randy Hodson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 03 -081
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT,APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE PRELRAINARY DEVELOPMENT
PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA AND THE FINAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL PLAT FOR THE RETAIL AREA
WHEREAS, in August, 2003,Apache Redevelopment,LLC, submitted a Planned Unit Development
(PUD) application to the City and consultants Dahlgren Shardlow and Uban(DSU); and
WHEREAS, after review, said application was found to be complete (see attached DSU document
dated August 28, 2003); and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2003,the St. Anthony Planning Commission held a public hearing on
the preliminary development plan and preliminary plat for the entire project area and the
final development plan and final plat for the retail portion of the Northwest Quadrant
area; and
WHEREAS, the following conditions and findings were presented to the Planning Commission by
DSU(document dated September 8, 2003 attached hereto):
Findings of Fact:
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
The proposed PUD is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan
identifies the Apache Plaza area as a commercial redevelopment opportunity and states that the
City desires to take an active role in guiding its design. The Comprehensive Plan includes a
Commercial Mixed Use land use plan category, which is applied to all property in the PUD
area. This designation allows for retail uses as well as light industrial, office, warehouse, and
residential uses and maintains the maximum amount of flexibility that an outmoded site such as
Apache Plaza requires for redevelopment.
2. Consistency with Zoning
The subject property is currently zoned Commercial. The application for PUD approval requests
a change in zoning from Commercial to a PUD District. At the most basic level, the
Comprehensive Plan designates commercial mixed use, so the PUD zoning provides the means
by which to approve the mixed use. The Planned Unit Development section of the Zoning
Ordinance allows for the implementation of a flexible development program, including the
following aspects:
a. Variety: Within a comprehensive site design concept, a mixture of land uses, housing
types and densities.
The proposed PUD contains this variety of elements.
b. Sensitivity: Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks, yard
areas, lot sizes, minimum house sizes, minimum requirements and other performance
standards associated with traditional zoning, a PUD can maximise the development
potential of land while remaining sensitive to its unique and valuable natural
characteristics.
'The PUD District will allow the development of a mixed-use urban village that departs
from the strict application of dimensional and performance standards found in
traditional zoning districts. As a result, the PUD will restore natural features and open
space into the subject property and creates links to the surrounding community, through
opportunities for trail and transit connections.
c. Efficiency: The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths and
other utility-related expenses.
The redevelopment will boast an impressive central parkfacility that will act as the focal
point of the development and a strong amenity for the whole St. Anthony community.
This integrated system of open space throughout the development will fulfills both
aesthetic and functional purposes. The network will serve to connect the various elements
of the development to each other and will also help foster connections at the edges of the
development with the rest of the community.
d. Density Transfer: The project density may be clustered, basing density on a number of
units per acre in place of specific lot dimensions.
The subject property contains approximately 45.05 acres of land. The proposed PUD
includes approximately 662 dwelling units,for an overall density of 14.69 dwelling units
per acre. This density is being clustered in the western portion of the property, in the
form of townhomes, apartments and urban flats.
e. District Integration: The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning
districts, such as mixed residential uses to allow densities and unit types to be varied
within the project; mixed residential uses with increased density based upon the greater
sensitivity of PUD projects to regulation; and mixed land uses with the integration of
compatible land uses within the project.
The proposed PUD includes a mix of residential density and unit types, in proximity to
open space, retail uses, and transit opportunities. The inhabitants of the residential
portion of the property, along with the.citizens of St. Anthony in general, will be able to
take advantage of the commercial, transit, and open space uses on the site.
3. Consistency with NW Quadrant Redevelopment Plan
In 2000, the City of St. Anthony Village began to proactively pursue a planning process for the
redevelopment of the "Northwest Quadrant" of the City, an area of approximately 250 acres
extending from Silver Lane on the north, Silver Lake Road on the east, the railroad tracks north
of 37th Avenue on the south and Stinson Road on the west. The city appointed a twenty-six
member project steering committee comprised of local residents to meet regularly with the city
and its planning consultants and provide input and direction to the process. The role of the
steering committee was to:
• Represent a broad cross-section of community opinion;
• Serve as the primary working group for the.Northwest Quadrant planning project;
• Serve as the sounding board and reaction panel for the consultants and the City Council;
• Review, comment and advise the Planning Commission and City Council on-key issues, plan
alternatives, and policy questions.
The City hired planning, redevelopment, and fiscal consultants to assist in the creation of a plan
and selection of a qualified developer. In July 2001, the City adopted the Northwest Quadrant
Redevelopment Plan for the entire 250 acres that incorporated the planning goals. The goals of
the planning process included:
• Involving the community in determining the best type of redevelopment for the northwest
section of the city;
• Redeveloping a mostly vacant, market-obsolete, first generation regional mall facility;
• Determining the most cost effective method of redevelopment for Apache Plaza: demolition,
clean-up and site preparation versus adaptive reuse;
• Exploring innovative and watershed-wide techniques for surface water.management to
improve Silver Lake's condition;
• Providing additional employment opportunities for residents within walking distance of
transit and other uses;
• Determining the housing needs of the city, in particular, for life cycle and affordable housing;
• Increasing opportunities for transit use and providing more amenities to encourage walking
and biking;
• Working cooperatively with adjacent and/or affected units of government;
• Developing a trail system around Silver Lake to provide public open space.
The Plan included a Master Framework Plan to illustrate the overall vision for redevelopment of
the area and to provide acceptable site planning and design principles and standards to guide the
design of all features of the site and create a consistent character for the site that would be
compatible with surrounding development.
6
Planning for the NW Quadrant culminated in a developer selection process in early 2002. This
development team has created the Village at St. Anthony Preliminary Development Plan for the
subject area. The PUD Plan as been guided by the NW Quadrant Master Framework-Plan and
complies with its guiding principles, as described below.
a. Identity, Character and Diversity: The Northwest Quadrant should develop with
extraordinary identity, character and diversity. It should create places and uses that are
known throughout the community and region as outstanding and interesting examples of
planning and design.
The Village at St. Anthony creates a village character by establishing a main street
commercial area, complete with ornamental lighting and pedestrian friendly streets and
sidewalks; and by including high quality residential buildings flanked by trees and placed
adjacent to narrow streets.
b. Integration with Community: The new development conceived for the site is unlike most
of the existing building stock in the village and the redevelopment area is physically
separated from the community to a significant degree. Each of these factors will make it
challenging to physically integrate the new development into the community. Creating the
feeling that the new neighborhood is part of the community will be an important
consideration.
A development of the size and nature of the Village at St. Anthony benefits greatly from
possessing a number of governing design elements that identify each component of the
project as being part of the same new neighborhood. These common features come in the
form of related architectural treatments, streetscape elements, and site planning
guidelines. The Village at St. Anthony Design Framework Manual sets forth the vision for
the overall design and character of the Village at St. Anthony. The Manual contains
guidelines for site design, architecture, streetscape, signs, lighting and landscaping that
have guided the design of the Preliminary Development and will continue to steer the
implementation phases of development. The Manual should be used as a tool by the City
to evaluate design elements and as a resource for landowners to achieve a consistent
design character and level of quality; it is not the intent of the Manual to require future
improvements to be exactly like the samples shown.
Another way of integrating the PUD into .the community will be through the use of the
retail and open space elements by citizens that don't work or live in the development.
The PUD will encourage residents from other parts of St. Anthony to frequent the new
development to take advantage of the new commercial opportunities and the new open
space connections.
c. Integration of Uses Remaining In and Around Development Area: In order to maximize
the potential for redevelopment on the mall site certain additional properties will need to
be included in the project.
Not all of the properties included in the Preliminary Development Plan will necessarily
be included in the final redevelopment, .as depicted. The Plan shows redevelopment
occurring on sites adjacent to the Apache Mall property itself. All uses along the west
side of Silver Lake Rd from the railroad tracks north to Silver Lane are shown as being
redeveloped. The Plan also shows those uses located on the east side of Stinson Blvd
from 37th Ave NE to 39th Ave NE and along both sides of 39th east of Stinson, which in
fact may not be immediately developed. Uses that would not be redeveloped include the
Apache office building at the corner of Stinson Blvd and Silver Lane, the Equinox
apartment complex and the Cub food store.
The Cub food store serves as the focal point for a commercial,hub north of the new east-
west roadway. The new discount retail store will serve as the focal point for a
commercial hub south of the new east-west roadway. These uses will be grouped to
create a sense of closure and space, rather than a strip of separate buildings and parking
lots.
Access to the existing Equinox apartment complex may ultimately tie into the street grid
pattern, and attempts will be made to connect and,integrate these apartments with the
rest of the development, although the existing garage structures effectively fence them in,
providing a stark edge rather than an inviting opening. The garages may be able to be
screened or softened with extensive landscaping or other elements of the streetscape.
All other businesses and buildings that will not be redeveloped will be integrated into the
overall development plan through the use of landscaping, lighting, coordinated access
points, signage, and other means.
I Use of Existing Access Points: The regional mall heritage of the site has provided it with
two signalized and two non-signalized entrances. In reforming the interior automotive
circulation system first consideration should be given to maintaining these four entrances
as the primary and secondary access points to the site.
The redevelopment area currently has a very poor circulation pattern. In order to
maximize the potential for the core area of the site, a new central roadway has been
designed, traversing the site east-west. This new street links the existing signalized
intersections of Silver Lake Rd and Stinson Blvd with 39th Avenue NE. It also maintains .
access along Silver Lake Rd north of the Taco Bell, and along Stinson Blvd at 38M
Avenue (for the residential portion, only).
e. Development of Roadway Spine Through Site (39th Avenue Extension): In order to
maximize the potential for the core land-locked area of the site a new major east-west
roadway traversing the site will be required. This new street can begin and end at the
signalized intersections of both Silver Lake Rd and Stinson Blvd with 39th Avenue NE.
As stated in item d, a new central roadway has been designed, traversing the site east-
west. This new street links the existing signalized intersections of Silver Lake Rd and
Stinson Blvd with 39th Avenue NE and will connects commercial, residential, and park
uses and provides access into commercial parking lots and residential streets. The
roadway will also have an important symbolic value providing a gateway entrance point
in the new development, and will visually tie together the various land uses along it.
f. Reintroduction of Grid Within Site: The site is large enough to require an internal
network of streets to provide sufficient access to residents and visitors. A network or grid
will insure numerous alternatives for automobile traffic throughout the site and provide
convenient spacing for pedestrian movement.
An internal network of streets has been designed to provide sufficient access to residents
and visitors. The primary route through the site is the site is the parkway along 39`h
Avenue NE. This boulevard will provide connections between commercial, residential
and park uses for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists. It will serve as the :principal
village street, encouraging pedestrian movement and calmed traffic. Gateways into the
development and access roadways leading to parking lots and service areas will include
landscaping, lighting and pedestrian amenities. Connections into the residential areas
will be made through Parkway. Secondary residential streets will provide access to the
residential parking lots and underground garages.
g. Sidewalks and Pedestrian/Bicycle Paths: Integral to the function of this new
neighborhood is the development of an integrated system of sidewalks, pedestrian paths
and bicycle paths.
Bicycles will be accommodated on the network of neighborhood and village type streets
that will be created as part of the redevelopment. Bicycle racks will be provided at key
locations. All streets will accommodate pedestrian movement either with sidewalks,
trails, or wide village-type streetscape areas. In addition, pedestrian connections to the
existing Cub Foods store and to the proposed discount retailer will also be provided.
h. Transit Linkages: The site should offer the opportunity to enhance existing transit service
in a number of ways. The addition of a significant number of residents to the site has the
potential to increase ridership over current levels if adequate facilities are provided,while
the extension 39th Avenue as a new central parkway will offer a cleaner, more direct
route through the site.
The Apache Plaza site is currently served by MetroTransit bus routes 4, 25, and 801.
Routes 4 and 25 connect the site to downtown Minneapolis and to the City of New
Brighton and Northtown Mall (respectively). Route 801 connects the site.by limited stop
to Rosedale Mall and to the Brookdale Transit Center, which serves cities west of the
river. The Village at St. Anthony will continue to accommodate these three routes with
stops along 39th Avenue, which will provide an easier crossing of the site for routes 4
and 25.
i. Development of Key Central Open Space/Network of Open Spaces: The development of
a high amenity central open space approximately in the center of the redevelopment site is
considered to be a key early implementation step. The creation of a key central open
space is just one of the elements required to assure a high level of pedestrian friendliness
and an inviting atmosphere.
The redevelopment will boast an impressive central park facility that will act as the focal
point of the development and a strong amenity for the whole St. Anthony community. In
addition to the new east-west parkway, it is a major organizing element of the interior of
the site. Removal of the shopping center will alter the current image of the site and the
development of the park facility will be a focal point for the new development. Leading
away from the park will be a series of trails, sidewalks and connected open spaces that
will link the site internally and enhance connections with the surrounding neighborhoods.
This integrated system of open spaces throughout the development fulfills both aesthetic
and functional purposes. The network will serve to -connect the various elements of the
development to each other and will also help foster connections at the edges of the
development with the rest of the community.
j. Silver Lake Water Quality: The water quality of Silver Lake is a critical issue to the
neighborhoods surrounding the lake and redevelopment on this site should do its part to
preserve and improve that water quality through careful handling of storm water and
enhancements to the surface water management system.
The development will directly contribute to the improvement of water quality in nearby
Silver Lake. Currently, a portion of the Apache Plaza Mall roof and parking lot drains
directly into pipes and into Silver Lake without treatment. Some of the ponds on site
right now are too small to offer very much treatment. As proposed in the PUD, all of the
drainage will be directed into ponds that are redesigned and expanded to meet the Rice
Creek Watershed District's standard of 60% phosphorus removal. The City has also
submitted a grant application to Rice Creek to fund a chemical treatment cell in a
segment of the pond that would remove almost all of the phosphorus. ('Phis grant is
pending.)
The park and open space system is also designed to function as a storm water treatment
and retention basin. This pond will be surrounded by green spaces which will provide
additional treatment of stormwater routed from parking lot areas through the buffer and
into the stormwater treatment basins.
As a condition of approval, the developer will be required to obtain a National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and a Rice Creek Watershed District
(RCWD) permit. The NPDES is regulated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
and includes guidelines and requirements that the developer will follow to reduce
sediment discharge off the construction site. The RCWD reviews development and
grading plans through their permitting process. The developer will be detailing the
erosion control plans for the site through these permitting processes.
k. Integration of Stormwater Management into Open Space Network: The open space
network will serve as the location of an integrated stormwater management system that
will connect through the site, which can be built up during the different phases of the
redevelopment, as long as it is planned and well integrated as a whole.
The redevelopment area will include an open space that will function as an integrated
stormwater management system connected through the site. The network is not planned
as an upfront implementation step, as is the central park, but rather will be phased and
integrated as the site develops. Where possible, stormwater will be kept above ground
and open to the air, in ponds, fountains, and other water features that will allow for
maximum penetration of surface water into the ground and maximum benefit as an
amenity to existing and future development.
1. Site Planning/Building Characteristics: The NW Quadrant Redevelopment Plan included
a Master Framework Plan to illustrate the overall vision for redevelopment of the area
and to provide acceptable site planning and design principles and standards to guide the
design of all features of the site and create a consistent character for the site that would be
compatible with surrounding development.
Building on the Master Framework Plan, the Village at St. Anthony includes a Design
Framework Manual specific to this development site. A development of the size and
nature of the Village at St. Anthony benefits greatly from possessing a number of
governing design elements that identify each component of the project as being part of
the same new neighborhood. These common features come in. the form of related
architectural treatments, streetscape elements, and site planning guidelines.
This Manual sets forth the vision for the overall design and character of the Village at St.
Anthony. The Manual contains guidelines for site design, architecture, streetscape,
signs, lighting and landscaping that have guided the design of the Preliminary
Development Plan and will continue to steer the implementation phases of development.
The intent of the guidelines is to establish a level of quality for the all of the design
elements within the development. The Manual provides representative photos and
graphics of landscaping, lighting, signage, and other design elements, based on local and
national sources that illustrate the quality that is to be achieved at the Village at St.
Anthony. This manual should be used as a tool by the City to evaluate design elements
and as a resource for landowners to achieve a consistent design character and level of
quality. It is not the intent of this manual to require future improvements to be exactly
like the samples shown.
4. Consistency with Livable Communities Objectives
This project directly complies with the following Livable Communities objectives:
• The development creates connected places that support auto,pedestrian, and bike travel, are
linked to transit, and will build capacity for future transit.
• The development balances residential, commercial, workplace, and public/green spaces
within and adjacent to the site.
• The development maximizes the potential of existing infrastructure, buildings,facilities and
development centers,particularly along existing transportation corridors.
• The development expands housing options, especially close to jobs.
• The development fosters distinctive community places and promotes community identity.
• The development considers the natural environment, including restoring natural features and
managing stormwater.
5. Consistency with Smart Growth Objectives
The overall NW Quadrant area was selected as one of six Opportunity Sites for the Metropolitan
Council's Smart Growth Twin Cities initiative to promote a new and sustainable model for
growth in the metropolitan area. The principles upon which the smart growth initiative are based
include planning for compact and mixed land use patterns that are sensitive to the environment
and that offer greater transportation choices, designing human scale communities with people's
needs and preferences foremost in mind, and creating community-based plans and designs using
innovative public involvement methods. The City of St. Anthony Village opportunity site was
selected because it offers the potential to develop a mixed-use community of neighborhood scale
and to serve as a regional model for redirecting obsolete retail sites to meet contemporary needs.
The Village at St. Anthony PUD meets these objectives.
1 31 OUT I R71 DYN a /
That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the application for the
Y 1
Village at St. Anthony PUD Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, as well as the
Final Development Plan and Final Plat of Subdivision for the r6tail-portion of the PUD, subject
to the following conditions of approval:
1. The PUD shall be developed in accordance with the following exhibits, which are
incorporated by reference to the Village at St. Anthony PUD:
a. PUD General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat Submission, dated August 8, 2003
b. Design Framework Manual, dated August 19, 2003
c. .Final Development Plan Site Plan, dated September 3, 2003
d. Final Development Plan Watermain and Sanitary Sewer Plan, dated September 3, 2003
e. Final Development Plan Storm Sewer Plan, dated September 3, 2003
f. Final Development Plan Finish Grade Plan, dated September 3, 2003
g. Final Landscape Plan, dated September 3, 2003
h. Final Plat, dated September 3, 2003
2. The PUD shall be developed in accordance with a Planned Unit Development Agreement, to
be entered into by the City and the developer.
3. The developer shall provide an Erosion Control Plan, subject to the review and approval by
the City Engineer,prior to recordation of the Final Plat.
4. The developer shall secure an NPDES Permit,prior to recordation of the Final Plat.
5. The developer shall secure a.Rice Creek Watershed District Permit, prior to recordation of
the Final Plat.
WHEREAS, in addition to the conditions and findings set forth above and listed in the attached DSU
document dated September 8, 2003,the Planning Commission recommended Council
approval of the condition"that the applicant or a related entity purchase the property
known as the CUB Foods Store property" as stated in the attached letter from Malkerson
Gilland Martin LLP, dated September 16,2003 (CUB Foods Store project property
condition).
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St.Anthony hereby
approves the Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat for the entire project area and the Final
Development Plan and Final Plat for the retail portion of the Northwest Quadrant Redevelopment, as
presented at a public hearing on September 16, 2003 to the St.Anthony Planning Commission and as set
forth in the documents attached hereto, and specifically adopts the findings and conditions of approval
presented to the Planning Commission by DSU and the Cub Foods Store project property condition.
Adopted this 3 day of 2003.
Mayor
ATTEST: 4
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
ty Mander
r
CANADIAN Real Estate suite 804 Fax(612)904-6147
PACIFIC (S4Marquette Avenue South
)
RAILWAY. PO Box 530(55440)
Minneapolis Minnesota
November 4, 2003
City of St Anthony
Attn: Susan Hall
3301 Silver Lake Road
St Anthony, MN 55418-1699
RE: Property Address: Apache Plaza Area
Applicant: Apache Redevelopment LLC
Hearing Date: 11/18/2003
This is in response to the proposed re-zoning referenced above and is intended to
substitute.for the railroad's attendance at the public hearing. As owners of facilities
adjacent to the project, the Soo.Line Railroad.(dba Canadian.Pacific Railway) hereby
states.for the record that the railroad opposes the re-zoning of the property due to the
close proximity of newresidential development to the railroad corridor.
The railroad realizes that land is a valuable commodity and that undeveloped areas in the
metro area are in high demand for residential development. However, the railroad is
inherently an industrial activity and, like it or not, we create various unavoidable impacts
on our neighbors. During the last couple of decades, rail traffic volume has been on the
increase, while at the same time the overall number of rail corridors has decreased,
resulting in higher rail traffic on the remaining lines. The common philosophy among
many city planners and the railroad industry is that the presence.of a railroad should be
taken into consideration when developing zoning or comprehensive plans. It is difficult,
if not impossible, to relocate rail corridors. The preferred approach is to locate
compatible land uses such as industrial or commercial areas along the right of way.
Access to rail is a valuable resource. We suggest that planners employ efforts to use
rail's existence to enhance the economic strength of the community.
If there is no alternative to developing residential housing near a rail corridor, there are a
few measures that can be taken to mitigate the impact on future residents. First,
construction should incorporate generous setbacks between the right of way and occupied
dwellings. Green space or storage uses can be planned for areas closer to the right of
way. Fencing should be required along all borders with the railroad to.ensure the safety
of children, pets and others. In addition to setbacks,berming or other designfeatures can
soften noise and visual issues. Finally, it should be disclosed and emphasized to
prospective purchasers of residential housing that they would be living next to a railroad
track and that they should be aware and accepting of the situation that they would be
moving into. Often, prospective homebuyers view a home site and are not aware of the
proximity of the railroad track or visit at a time when there is no activity; later to discover
that nighttime is a common time for through-train activity. For informational purposes,
Canadian Pacific Railway has prepared a brief brochure that attempts to answer many of
the common questions about railroad operations. This pamphlet was tailored for the
Twin Cities area, but the substance applies to any metro area. I have enclosed a copy for
your information.
I would appreciate that this letter be made of record during the review of the proposed
rezoning and site plan. It is the railroad's preference that any proposal to develop
residential housing immediately adjacent to the right of way be denied. Asa backup
position, we request that the City require that the developer include the previously
mentioned mitigating measures in their design and that they be required to disclose to
prospective purchasers the nature of the adjacent railroad operations.
Sincerely.
Bob Miller
Real Estate Tax Administrator
612-904-6145
Bob_Miller@cpr.ca
Enclosure
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
Do you carry hazardous materials? Do you cut brush or spray weeds along the tracks?
Heating fuel, perfume, safe drinking water, healthy We do both. Weed sprays approved by the Environ- CANADIAN
crops, soft drinks. These are life's necessities and mental Protection Agency are used on the track surface
conveniences which also all contain hazardous materials. (about the width of the ties). The spraying is F .ventative PACIFIC
Our railroad carries these materials to manufacturers all maintenance to keep weeds from growing under the
over North America. We follow strict federal rules as to track surface. Plants and shrubs along the sides of the .` FCA I LWAY _ Y
how it is done. The regulations specify the types of tracks are generally left to grow naturally. However, if 1 1TM
containers, markings, placement in trains and information brush (trees, shrubs) along the tracks become a safety
that must be available should an accident occur. Rail hazard to trains or motorists at crossings, they will be cut
roads work with local emergency responders (fire, police, down. Special equipment usually traveling on the tracks ,
emergency management) to make sure there are plans in will cut brush which will be removed or chipped by a Meet Your New Neighbor - The Railroad
place to deal with any problems and to understand the follow-up crew. You can expect from time to time that
nature of the materials being carried. On average, crews will take down excess growth, often to the edges of
hazardous materials are in 5% or less of the cars we the property. If you are a home buyer planning to move into a and the US, from the Pacific to the Atlantic and -
handle each year. neighborhood which borders one of Canadian beyond Chicago in America's Midwest. The railroad
Do you also move passengers? Pacific Railway's lines, we look forward to being your takes in $2.6 billion each year almost all from moving
Who owns the property under your tracks? neighbor. At the same time, we want you to know freight. In turn, we will spend nearly$1 billion annu-
Amtrak uses Canadian Pacific Railway lines move more about us before you make your buying deck ally on repair, maintenance and improvement of
In most cases the property is owned by the railroad. passenger trains between their station located inn the sion to make sure we have a long and friendly equipment and facilities.
As a simple rule of thumb, railroad property generally Midway area and Chicago. There are several existing
extends 50 feet from the center line of the tracks where freight routes into the Twin Cities that are under consider- relationship. You should know more about what we Our business is international in scope with
there is a single track in place. Railroads pay Minnesota ation by the state of Minnesota for commuter purposes. transport, how often trains run, and how we use our goods moving to and from other points in North
taxes on their property (centrally assessed by the state) • If established, passenger trains would connect the property. America including ports for import or export. The
and pay the cost for upkeep of the tracks. As a result, downtown core areas of St. Paul and Minneapolis with Canadian Pacific Railway's (CPR) heritage is goods we carry are closely related to the economy;
railroads use their private property for the benefit of the outlying communities. The process to establish com- linked to North America's oldest operating railroad coal for electricity, grain for food, autos to dealers,
business and its customers. muter service is ongoing. and its first transcontinental railway. Canadian and so on. When economic activity is booming,
Should I be concerned about the safety of children Do you anticipate any changes to your lines? Pacific became the first railroad to build a line across there_.are lots of trains on the move.
playing on the tracks? Canada connecting the Atlantic and Pacific while its We hope the Question and Answer format
We always anticipate that traffic will grow on any of Delaware & Hudson subsidiary in the Northeast is which follows along with a map of CPR's Twin City
Definitely, Yes. Children should not play on the tracks our lines and there will be additional trains. Traffic the oldest continuously operating railroad in the US.. lines will be helpful to you. Keep in mind, it is a
or walk across railroad bridges. It can be a very.clanger- patterns can also change periodically meaning trains may In the Twin Cities, operations include those of Soo snapshot in time, subject to change as business.
ous situation to use the tracks as a trail or a place.to hike, use different routes to-get to and from customers. The Line Railroad Company, which is wholly owned by levels go up or down and as the Railroad changes
fish or for other recreational purposes. A train or other changes could be permanent or temporary. If we decide CPR and does business under the CPR name. operations.
vehicle using the tracks can come along at any time. to abandon a line, we must have Surface Transportation We cover 14,400 route miles in both Canada
And, since it's private property, to do so is trespassing. Board approval to do so and our plans will be made
public in advance.
Do you store freight cars along the tracks?
What if the rail line in the area we are looking at isn't
Most freight cars are brought into centrally located owned by CPR? Why should I care about having a rail line as a Are you the only railroad using your tracks?
yards, and split up for delivery to customers. From time - neighbor?
to time, a train may leave cars on a sidetrack for short There are other railroads operating in the Twin Cities -There may be agreements in place allowing a non
periods. If business declines and a large number of cars that you can call for information. Consult the phone book Our railroad frequently gets questions from home owner to operate trains over another railroad's property.
are not needed, they will be stored on sidetracks close to for listings for Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Union buyers who have moved into neighborhoods bordering It would not be unusual to see several railroads using the
areas where they may be needed in the future. Pacific, Wisconsin Central, Twin Cities & Western, or on our rail lines. They are surprised to learn there are tracks of a single owner. For example, numerous rail-
Minnesota Commercial Railroads. many trains on a line they thought was seldom used. roads operate trains through the Midway area between
How frequently do you maintain the tracks? Trains at midnight weren't expected. Others are curious Minneapolis and St. Paul on tracks owned by the
about the right-of-way and how we maintain it. It is good Burlington Northern Sante Fe.
Railroad tracks are maintained to a standard set by _ to know before you move in, what to expect from the
the Federal Railroad Administration which also deter- railroad. What is in a typical train?
mines the maximum speed allowed. The agency also
inspects CPR's trackage. Frequent inspections are made Which rail lines does CPR operate? CPR handles a wide variety of materials related to
by the railroad and any defects repaired. From time to agriculture, mining, manufacturing, and forestry. Long
time, special rail inspection vehicles will travel over the The map inside shows the general location of the lines trains carrying grain, coal, automobiles, steel, lumber,
track to locate any defects or check the alignment of the the Railway owns or travels over in the Twin Cities area. paper, fertilizers, fuels, chemicals and all types of manu-
track. Routine maintenance is handled by a local "sec- The information in this brochure is published For simplification, CPR lines are depicted as being in two factured goods are typical. The trains may be made up
tion crew" which is responsible for a stretch of track. If by Canadian.Pacific Railway, broad categories. "Mainline" routes carry traffic which is of mixed products or carry a single commodity in every
major upgrading is done, such as laying new rail or Communications& Public Affairs Department, moving to or from the Twin Cities or just passing through car or container. Virtually everything you have in your
installing many new ties,.a special crew will come in and P. O. Box 530, Minneapolis, MN 55440. to another city. Mainline routes are the busiest segments home, including the materials in your house, likely moved
handle the work in a production line fashion. The railroad and carry the most trains. "Industrial" or "branch lines" on a train at some point.
also has other maintenance people who work on bridges, Date of Publication: August, 2000 connect the through routes with customers or other
buildings, wayside signals and the warning devices at railroads located in the Twin Cities area. These lines will (continued inside)
crossings. have fewer trains on them.
When can I expect a train?
The simple answer is at any time day or night. Rail- G: Branch line extends north from a connection with
roads are a 24-hour operation and we schedule trains to BNSF line near Maryland Avenue, past St. Paul Water
depart and arrive at.all hours of the.day. Extra trains or C A N A D 1 N . PA C I F i .o RAILWAY Treatment Plant, through Little Canada to connection with
"unit trains" (solid trainload of one commodity).are . east-west.line (H),'at 1694 and Rice.Street in.Shoreview.
frequently-used to`handle increases'in business and are TWin.:City.Routes Ownedl or Used Expect 4-8 trains per day.
scheduled to run without regard for the time of day. If
demand for a commodity.goes up, expect additional H:-Line extends from-CPR's distribution center along
trains to handle the volume. If volume drops off, expect o• Central Avenue NE through St. Anthony Village, New
fewer trains. Remember, a healthy economy means more ' Brighton, Arden Hills, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, North
goods on the move and more trains. Sw White Bear Lake Oaks and White Bear Lake. This line is owned by CPR,
75E but most trains using it are operated by Wisconsin
How Do You Set Your Train Schedules? g Central Railway. Traffic volume is largely determined by
the number of WC trains operated daily.
The Railroads in North America are really one large r 694 Shoreview
interconnected system. A train schedule may be based A crystal , I: Branch line extending south from Crystal through New
on the time goods must be on a ship in time to depart 4 NewErighton H Hope, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Edina and
from a port 2,000 miles away. .The schedule.may also be Plymouth
Bloomington. It crosses.the.Minnesota River near
based on the needs of a customer who will use parts on Little Shakopee and travels through Burnsville and Lakeville to
an assembly line within hours of the time it arrives. Other Golden Valley J G Sa its terminus in Northfield. Depending on the area, there
schedules may have flexibility built in because the crew _
t- °- may little activity to one or more trains each business day
has to stop many times to pick up and drop off freight Toa N
t Q "•' � -= .:•, ;�, ;,,.;: .:, both directions. The line is also used b the Twin Cities
cars. For example, a train operating through the Twin ' y
X y S and Western Railroad. This segment is under review as a
Cities late at night may have to meet a Chicago Sc Lois Park Fr potential commuter rail corridor and has taken on the
customer's delivery schedules the next day. As a result,
corridor designation "Dan Patch Line."
schedules are set for all hours of the day. D
Hopkins
.w Edina J: Branch line extending east from the area of Highway
11 APC+ figs
Do you blow whistles? i tV�f .7 ((ffJ CPR Used Line 55 and 100 in Golden Valley, alongside Wirth Park,
Richre'dC <—' Line Segment terminating on the west edge of downtown Minneapolis
At.the;present.time, our railroad blows whistles in near Glenwood Avenue and 194. Expect a train each
advance of any crossing unless there has been a local K �� `°` - See index)) direction-each work day orlon an as needed basis.
ordinance in effect for some time. Even if an ordinance is Mendota -
in place, the crew can blow a horn if they believe it is Bloomington Heights
needed to warn someone of the train's presence. In ' K: Branch line extends NE from Auto Club Road, along
35EK:
Shakopee Road through Bloomington, along Pleas-
(FRA), which regulates railroads from a safety standpoint,
January of 2000, the Federal Railroad Administration O Cottage Grove ant Avenue in Richfield and terminates near Lyndale Ave
two blocks north of the crosstown Highway. Expect a
began a formal process which is expected to lead to a L train each direction each workday or as needed.
national rule regarding the use of train horns. The FRA Savage
has already held hearings throughout the country seeking L: CPR transits over lines of Union Pacific to Rosemount
input from communities, safety experts, railroads.and and on its own line to Northfield. Expect one CPR train
others on how horns should be used. They are expected Rosemount each direction per day. Most traffic on the line is oper-
to issue a final rule that will take effect in the future. It will ated by Union Pacific.
take a year or more to implement a final policy once the
rules are known, . Horns are an�effective.safety device to (continued on back page) M:.Industrial branch line running north from Rosemount,
warn motorists and pedestrians of an approaching train. alongside Highway 61 through Newport and Cottage Grove to paralleling Highways 3 & 149 to its terminus at the north
Locomotives are also equipped with a bell which is used DESCRIPTION OF LINE SEGMENTS Hastings. This line is jointly used with the Burlington Northern end near Highway 13. Expect a train each direction each
when trains move over crossings. Santa Fe and is under consideration for Commuter Rail with the business day or as needed.
A: CPR's mainline route into the Twin Cities from the West. corridor designated the "Red Rock Corridor."
What kinds of noises can I expect from a train? Expect more than 16 trains on a daily basis. The line N: Industrial branch line extending from Line A near
extends west across the Mississippi River near Camden, D: St. Paul industrial lines which run along the river front through Camden, south along 1st Avenue North to its termination
Unlike a freeway or busy road, the track is generally a crosses over Highway 100 south of Brookdale Shopping downtown St. Paul, across Chestnut Street, up the side of the bluff near Plymouth Avenue. Expect one train each way per
very quiet place most of the time. When a train does Center and passes through Crystal, New Hope and Pl 9 and along Ayd Mill Road to the Amtrak Depot in Midway. Expect business day.
pass, you will hear the approach and passage of the mouth. The line crosses over Highway 55 at Hamel and up to a dozen trains per day including Amtrak.
locomotives followed by the movement of freight cars and extends on through Buffalo. O: CPR owns or operates over trackage extending from
wheels making contact with the rails as the train passes. E: Industrial line that branches off line D above in the vicinity of just west of 1494 in Eden Prairie; running east through
If it has stopped or is starting, you may hear the sound-of B: Through the Twin Cities, from NE Minneapolis to the _ West 7th Street and extends to Ford Assembly.Plant in Highland Hopkins and St. Louis Park to South Minneapolis: The _
brakes being.applied or:air ir under pressure passing river front near Sheppard Road in St. Paul, CPR trains travel Park. Expect 5-6 trains daily. , tracks are used primarily by the Twin Cities &Western
through
pi
through
There cng-on.each.car (air.is.used-to control brakes): over mainline tracks owned by the Burlington Northern-. Railroad. CPR.does provide service as'needed to one
ould be sounds.from-cars bumpting'together or- Sante Fe. F: Industrial line which extends west from vicinity of Cleveland customer located along.the line which parallels-29th
as the slack is.taken tightens when the train'moves Avenue, across 194 near highway 280, past Shriner's Children's Street. This portion of the railroad line is owned by
ahead. If you are close to an area where the railroad C: CPR's mainline route into the Twin Cities from the Hospital, across Mississippi River and paralleling 27th Street Hennepin County and will soon include a bike and hiking
switches cars or by a siding (extra track) where trains South. Expect 20 trains a day or more and switching through south Minneapolis. Line turns south, crosses lake State trail.
pass one another, locomotives may set for an extended activity in the vicinityof CPR's yard. The line extends from and parallels Hiawatha to its terminus in Minnehaha park. This line
period with the engines idling. Sheppard Road soth along the Company's freight yard, is owned by CPR but leased to and operated by Minnesota
Commercial Railway which determines train volumes.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28,2003 DRAFT
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 October 28, 2003
6
7 CALL TO ORDER.
8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
9
10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust.
15 Absent: None.
16 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson and City Attorney Jerry Gilligan.
17
18 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 I. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 28, 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
22 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, seconded by Councilmember Horst, to approve the City
23 Council Meeting Agenda of October 28, 2003.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
28 None.
29
30 III. COMMUNITY FORUM.
31 Mayor Hodson invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items
32 that are not on the regular agenda.
33
34 Hearing none, Mayor Hodson moved forward with the agenda.
35
36 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
37
38 A. Consider October 14, 2003 Council meeting minutes.
39 B. Consider licenses and permits -none.
40 C. Consider payment of claims.
41 D. Ordinance 2003-013,re: Heating licenses (2nd reading).
42 E. Ordinance 2003-014,re: Council meetings (2"d reading).
43 F. Resolution 03-095 re: 2004 street improvement project—receive plans and specifications and
44 approve advertisement for bids.
45
46 Mayor Hodson asked that Item F,Resolution 03-095 be pulled from the Consent Agenda and
47 placed under the General Policy Business of the Council as Item C.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2003
Page 2
1 Motion by Councilmember Faust seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve the Consent
2 Agenda items with the noted change above.
3
4 Motion carried unanimously.
5
6 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
7 None.
8
9 VI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
10 A. Kathy Anderson a representative of Congressman Sabo.
11 Mayor Hodson welcomed Kathy Anderson to the meeting.
12
13 Ms. Anderson, a representative of Congressman Sabo, addressed Council and provided an
14 update on the local office for District 5 and its local constituents. She stated the 1080' Congress
15 is about to adjourn. Ms. Anderson noted Congressman Sabo works on several sub-committees
16 including the Homeland Security Committee and the Commerce Justice and State
17 Subcommittees.
18
19 Ms. Anderson noted her office was trying to keep the constituents in District 5 informed and
20 invited the public to use the Internet to view information on the Congressman. She noted this
21 district had several openings in the ROTC program and asked for the public to contact her if they
22 knew of any recruits interested in this program.
23
24 Ms. Anderson stated Flags can be flown over the capitol for those in this District. She
25 encouraged those in the area to check into this as a great gift or remembrance for family
26 members. Ms. Anderson indicated all mail to Washington D.C. was slow due to the ongoing
27 threat of anthrax. She encouraged the public to email as it is faster. Ms. Anderson noted there
28 are limited tours to the White House at this time and are on a first come first serve basis with 10
29 spots available a week. She indicated any-one interested could contact her office. Ms.
30 Anderson left her card and a bio on the Congressman with the Council and offered to answer for
31 questions.
32
33 Councilmember Thuesen suggested putting the bio information on Congressman Sabo on the
34 City website.
35
36 Councilmember Faust stated that St. Anthony has been blessed by the fact that Congressmen
37 Sabo was part of the TCAAP water purification plant. He indicated that Congressman Sabo was
38 responsible for receiving a$10 million grant for the plant.
39
40 B. Lunette Wittsack representing the Metropolitan Council.
41 Mayor Hodson welcomed Lynette Wittsack to the meeting.
42
43 Ms. Wittsack, representing the Metropolitan Council, addressed Council and provided an update
44 on her representation of the City of St. Anthony. She indicated she was very interested in this
45 community as she grew up in the area. Ms. Wittsack explained she spent-the afternoon with
46 Susan Hall, the City Planner, and indicated she toured current developments. She stated she was
47 very excited to be a part of the community and asked if the Council had any questions.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2003
Page 3
1 Mayor Hodson thanked Ms. Wittsack for being present and thanked the Met Council for the
2 grant that assisted the City in jump-starting the major redevelopments in the City.
3
4 Councilmember Faust thanked Ms. Wittsack for coming to the meeting.
5
6 C. Planning Commission meeting—October 21, 2003
7 1. Resolution 03-093 re: Autumn Woods II, LLP, 2534, 2538, 2542, 2546, and 2548
8 Kenzie Terrace,• request amendment to Planned Unit Development
9 Planning Commissioner Steeves stated the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July
10 25, 2003, on the Autumn Woods II Planned Unit Development(PUD) amendment and
11 recommended City Council approval subject to there being 38 parking stalls rather than the
12 35 proposed; review of the plans and cross easements by the City Attorney; and completion
13 of the replat. On July 22, 2003 the City Council approved the PUD amendment with the
14 conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. After the approvals, Staff learned
15 that some of the neighbors of the development had not been notified of the July 15`''Public
16 Hearing, as they should have. Mr. Brewer opted to have a rehearing so that these neighbors
17 would have an opportunity to speak and provide input to the development. The Planning
18 Commission held that public hearing on October 21, 2003. He noted ponding was discussed
19 at this meeting along with screening on this site abutting the residential properties. Planning
20 Commissioner Steeves stated a fencing option was discussed as well,but noted this was left
21 up to the discretion of the developer after further discussions with the neighboring property
22 owners.
23
24 Commissioner Steeves provided the Council with a brief overview of the development
25 details stating that the developer has proposed an excellent fit with the adjacent
26 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to adopt Resolution
27 03-093,re: Autumn Woods II, LLP, 2534, 2538, 2542, 2546, and 2548 Kenzie Terrace;
28 amendment to Planned Unit Development with stated conditions.
29
30 Discussion:
31 Councilmember Thuesen asked what type of fencing was proposed. Commissioner Steeves
32 stated this was not addressed in detail,but the neighboring properties felt that a burm would
33 allow for passage through their property where a fence would increase the privacy of these
34 homeowners. He noted the developer was looking at the issue and noted the Commission was in
35 favor of the landscaping. Commissioner Steeves stated if a fence were put on this site, the
36 proposed landscaping would be scaled back.
37
38 Councilmember Horst questioned if the developer proposed the landscaping and burming.
39 Commissioner Steeves stated this was the case. He indicated however the neighboring
40 homeowners would be in favor of a fence and that it was left up to the developer's discretion to
41 work this out with the neighboring property owners.
42 City Manager Mornson noted there were two action items for this issue, one being the
43 amendment and the other being the rezoning of the property.
44
45 Motion carried unanimously.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2003
Page 4
1 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to adopt Ordinance
2 #2003-015, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 16 of the City Code,being the Zoning and Land
3 Use Chapter of the City of St. Anthony as it relates to Autumn Woods II.
4
5 Motion carried unanimously.
6
7 2. Resolution 03-094 re: St. Anthony Shopping Center, LLC, 2900 Pentagon Drive;
8 request amendment to Comprehensive Sign Plan_
9 Planning Commissioner Steeves stated at the September 16`h Planning Commission meeting,
10 the St. Anthony Shopping Center has presented sign criteria to address logo signage for their
11 comprehensive sign plan. This was unfinished business from the September 10h Public
12 Hearing in the applicant's efforts to update their comprehensive sign plan. The St. Anthony
13 Shopping Center recently signed leases with two tenants that have regional and national
14 scope, Bumper to Bumper and Subway. The current comprehensive sign plan does not
15 provide sufficient flexibility of sign design to accommodate regional and national tenants
16 that have logo signage for all locations. Commissioner Steeves noted that at the last
17 Planning Commission meeting, it was recommended to the City Council that yellow
18 lettering be added into the comprehensive sign plan for approval to allow Subway to put up
19 their sign adding that it was decided that the remaining issues surrounding the logos would
20 be addressed at a future meeting once the applicant presented the City with proposed
21 language.
22
23 Commissioner Steeves stated the Planning Commission recommends approval of the
24 amendment of the St Anthony Center Sign Criteria dated October 2, 2003 with the following
25 changes:
26
27 1. That the proposed language be amended to read up to two logo signs per tenant be
28 allowed.
29 2. That each logo sign cannot exceed 25% of the surface face area and that each logo sign
30 cannot exceed 20 square feet in certain space area.
31 3. Add language that any temporary signage must also comply with the maximum area sign
32 criteria.
33 4. To amend to allow white lettering, consistent in color with the Subway sign.
34
35 5. The amendment of approval is to be subject to all tenants being in compliance with the
36 sign plan and all other applicable ordinances regarding signage.
37
38 Commissioner Steeves stated the idea was that most tenants do not require two logo face signs,
39 but if they do they would be limited by the amount of square footage they are allowed and by the
40 size of each sign. He stated the goal was to accomplish an amendment that would also allow the
41 national tenant to move forward but without creating a shift in the signage that is allowed at the
42 shopping center.
43
44 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to adopt Resolution
45 03-094,re: St. Anthony Shopping Center, LLC, 2900 Pentagon Drive; amendment to
46 Comprehensive Sign Plan with stated conditions.
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2003
Page 5
Discussion:
Councilmember Horst indicated no examples were provided of the proposed signage and he
asked if any were available. Commissioner Steeves reviewed a proposed signage plan for
Bumper to Bumper Auto Parts with the Council.
Councilmember Horst indicated he did not understand the need for the second company logo on
the sign. Jim Crockeril Co-Owner St. Anthony Shopping Center, LLP, stated the representative
present at the last meeting indicated this was very important to the tenant occupying this space
and would need to be reviewed at a corporate level.
Councilmember Horst noted he was not happy with the proposal and stated if it was a deal
buster, he would wrestle with the proposed sign style and proposed amendment change.
Councilmember Faust asked if this solution would tailor to future tenants. Commissioner
Steeves stated the Resolution was crafted to allow this tenant to comply but would not allow
future tenants to create more than two company logo signs or 25% of the size of the total sign.
Councilmember Sparks indicated she was concerned about this tenant and if the window signage
would continue once the overhead sign was in place. City Manager Mornson indicated
temporary window signs have been placed at this site until the overhead signs were approved.
Councilmember Faust indicated this Resolution would clean up the site tremendously by
removing the window signs and by creating a uniform overhead sign.
Mayor Hodson indicated he was comfortable with the Resolution as stated and thanked the
Commission for their comprehensive work on the Sign Plan.
Councilmember Sparks indicated she was not comfortable with the two company logo signs.
Councilmember Horst noted this would be a different sign from what all other members in the
center have. He indicated he did not care for the design but would go with the Planning
Commissions recommendation.
Councilmember Faust asked what the vacancy rate was at this time. Mr. Crockeril indicated he
was about 95% full at this time.
Ayes—3, Nays=2(Iorst and Sparks). Motion carried.
Commissioner Steeves reviewed information on a proposed adult daycare in a light industrial
area in the City. Commissioner Steeves reported the property owner of a light industrial property
has been approached for the purchase of his property to run an adult daycare. He noted this was
not a permitted use in light industrial and would need a rezoning or an amendment to the light
industrial use within the City. He indicated there was a variety of concerns at a State and local
level at this time. Commissioner Steeves noted additional information was being gathered at this
time from the property owner and potential daycare personnel. He asked for Council to provide
the Commission with input at a future time.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2003
Page 6
1 Councilmember Thuesen indicated he felt this was a safety concern at this location. He asked if
2 the tenant had answers for such questions. Commissioner Steeves noted this information was
3 being gathered at this time and noted the proposed building on this site does not look light
4 industrial.
5
6 Councilmember Horst noted there could be sites,which would be more suitable for an adult
7 daycare throughout the City. Mayor Hodson thanked Commissioner Steeves for his report.
8
9 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
10 A. Resolution 03-097 Approving the Redevelopment Agreement for the Northwest
11 Quadrant Relating to the Agreement with Pratt-Ordwgy(Apache Redevelopment).
12 Mr. Gilligan reviewed the resolution with the Council and indicated that Jay Lindgren also of
13 Dorsey&Whitney would be reviewing this item with the Council.
14
15 Jay Lindgren reviewed the development agreement with the Council. He reported on the tax
16 increment financing issues with this development and noted public improvements would be the
17 responsibility of the City. He indicated the open space ponding improvements and special
18 assessments were set forth in the agreement.
19
20 Jay Lindgren stated the line of credit from Fannie Mae has been provided and does require a
21 pledge of collateral from the City. He noted all closing costs with that loan are the responsibility
22 of the developer. He noted additional tax revenue from Phase I could be used to move Phase 11
23 forward. He asked for questions and comments from the Council.
24
25 Mayor Hodson thanked everyone for their time and hard work on this development agreement.
26 He stated he was thankful there were no surprises at the end and that all has been clearly
27 hammered out.
28
29 Motion byCouncilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to adopt Resolution
30 03-097, re: Relating to the Redevelopment of Property in Redevelopment Project Area No. 3
31 (known as Apache Plaza) and Authorizing the Preparation, Execution and Delivery of a
32 Redevelopment Agreement and Related Agreements.
33 Motion carried unanimously.
34
35 Mayor Hodson invited Len Pratt to the podium for comments on the future of Apache Plaza and
36 if a ceremony could be held in memory of this local icon. Mr. Pratt stated the Chamber of
37 Commerce has an annual ball that may be turned into a"wrecking ball' to commemorate the
38 space. He stated an official groundbreaking ceremony would possibly take place some time in
39 April.
40
41 B. Consider Resolution 03-091 re: Fund transfer for Public Facilities project.
42 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to adopt Resolution
43 03-091,re: Fund transfer for Public Facilities project.
44
45 Motion carried unanimously.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2003
Page 7
1 C. Resolution 03-095 re 2004 Street Improvements Project—Receive Plans and
2 Specifications and Approve Advertisement for Bids.
3 Mayor Hodson clarified that bids would be opening on December 8, 2003 in the Council
4 Chambers and that the Council would consider them in February of 2004.
5
6 Todd Hubmer noted he met last night with roughly 40 residents to review the final 2004 street
7 improvement plans. He noted the bid would go out in mid-November. He stated changes and
8 adjustments could be made between now and that time.
9
10 Mr. Hubmer noted additional drainage areas were brought to his attention and would be
11 addressed. He stated these areas would be addressed and changes would be made in the plans if
12 needed. Mr. Hubmer indicated this was a great time for the City to go out for bid and noted
13 local contractors were very competitive at this time.
14
15 Councilmember Thuesen asked if drainage issues arose at a later time,would they be able to be
16 addressed. Mr. Hubmer indicated change orders would be possible if brought to the attention of
17 staff while the project is still in the process.
18
19 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to adopt Resolution
20 03-095, re: a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for
21 Bids on the 2004 Street Improvement Plan with the changes noted above by Mayor Hodson.
22
23 Motion carried unanimously.
24
25 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
26 Mr. Mornson reported on the following:
27
28 o The City Clerk would be retiring next year after numerous years of service.
29 o There would be a Council Meeting next Tuesday,November 4, 2003.
30 o He indicated the City was taking Applications for Planning Commission and Park
31 Commission vacancies.
32 o The Development Agreement has received preliminary approval from Fannie Mae and he
33 noted the next step was to rezone the site from Commercial to PUD.
34 o He congratulated the Council for moving forward with the Northwest Quadrant and noted
35 he was excited to move forward with the implementation of the agreement.
36
37 Councilmember Horst reported that he was proud to be a part of the Apache Redevelopment. He
38 stated he looks forward to working on this in the future.
39
40 Councilmember Sparks had no report.
41
42 Councilmember Thuesen had no report.
43
44 Councilmember Faust indicated that he received a letter on October 22, 2003 from Jan Reisner
45 stating the abandoned Burlington Northern Property had been purchased. He noted this was a
46 step in the right direction for future transportation from White Bear Lake to downtown
47 Minneapolis. Councilmember Faust added that Stonehouse was just a remnant of the City now.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2003
Page 8
1 Mayor Hodson thanked the Council for moving forward with the Northwest Quadrant
2 redevelopment. He noted he attended a Fall Forum on Tuesday of this week regarding
3 transportation.
4
5 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
6 None.
7
8 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
9 None.
10
11 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
12 Motion by Mayor Hodson to adjourn the meeting at 8:17 p.m.
13
14 Motion carried unanimously.
15
16 Respectfully submitted,
17
18
19 Heidi Guenther
20 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
21
22 Mayor
23 ATTEST:
24 City Clerk
25
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
November 4, 2003 DRAFT
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
4
5 November 4, 2003
6
7 CALL TO ORDER.
8 Mayor Hodson called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m.
9
10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11 Mayor Hodson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14 Present: Mayor Hodson; Councilmembers Horst, Sparks, Thuesen, and Faust.
15 Absent: None.
16 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson and City Clerk Connie Kroeplin.
17
18 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 I. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 4, 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
22 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Sparks, to approve the City
23 Council Meeting Agenda of November 4, 2003.
24
25 Motion carried unanimously.
26
27 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
28 None.
29
30 III. COMMUNITY FORUM.
31 Mayor Hodson invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items
32 that are not on the regular agenda.
33
34 Hearing none, Mayor Hodson moved forward with the agenda.
35
36 IV. CONSENT AGENDA.
37
38 Councilmember Sparks added Resolution 03-098, A Resolution approving submittal of the 2004
39 Ramsey County SCORE Funding Grant Application and Entering into a Contract for this
40 program.
41
42 A. October 28 2003 Council meeting minutes will be considered at November 25, 2003
43 meeting.
44 B. Consider licenses and permits.
45 C. Consider payment of claims.
46 D. Ordinance 2003-013 re: Heating Licenses (3`a reading).
47 E. Ordinance 2003-014 re: Council meetings (3rd reading).
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
November 4, 2003
Page 2
1 F. Resolution 03-098 re: Approving Submittal of the 2004 Ramse..County SCORE
2 Funding Grant Application and Entering in a Contract for this Program
3
4 Motion by Councilmember Sparks, seconded by Councilmember Faust, to approve the Consent
5 Agenda items as amended.
6
7 Motion carried unanimously.
8
9 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
10 None.
11
12 VI. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL.
13 A. Tamara Doolittle and Tom May, Hennepin County Assessing.
14 Mayor Hodson welcomed Tamara Doolittle and Tom May to the meeting.
15
16 Tom May,Hennepin County Assessor, addressed Council and provided an explanation of an
17 "Open Book"process instead of using a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. He noted
18 during the open book meeting, taxpayers meet individually with an appraiser to review the value
19 of the property, the property record, as well as to discuss comparable sales information. He
20 indicated an appointment would not be required and if a taxpayer's concerns were not resolved
21 after the meeting with an assessor, the taxpayer has two formal appeal options. He indicated
22 they had tried this process in other Cities with a lot of success.
23
24 Councilmember Faust asked where and what times would the open book be conducted. Mr.
25 May replied it would depend on the City, but in the City of Mound, it was one day that started
26 mid to late afternoon and went into the evening. He stated the taxpayers would be notified in
27 advance of the date and time.
28
29 Mayor Hodson replied he was comfortable with this process and believed it would be easier for
30 the residents.
31
32 Councilmember Faust stated already a third of the City went through this right now with Ramsey
33 County and they did not see anyone from Ramsey County coming forward with issues to the
34 Council. He stated this would bring the whole City in conformity and would be less stressful for
35 the residents.
36
37 Councilmember Thuesen stated he also supported this and believed this would help residents and
38 ease their fears.
39
40 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve the
41 transferring of the function of the local Board of Review from the St. Anthony City Council to
42 Hennepin County.
43
44 Motion carried unanimously.
45 VII. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF.
46 None.
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
November 4, 2003
Page 3
1 VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS.
2 Mr. Mornson reported that they had received a$180,000 grant from FEMA for the 800 radio
3 system. He stated they officially closed with Amcon on Monday. He noted last night they held a
4 neighborhood meeting for residents on 33rd by the water tower for a telecommunications site. He
5 indicated no one showed up for that meeting, so they would be going forward with a proposal to
6 using the water tower as a telecommunications site.
7
8 Councilmember Faust reported that he had been campaigning and enjoyed meeting the residents.
9 He stated it very rewarding and thanked everyone for the comments and suggestions.
10
11 Councilmember Horst reported thanked everyone who e-mailed and called him during the
12 campaign with the comments and suggestions.
13
14 Councilmember Sparks had no report.
15
16 Councilmember Thuesen had no report.
17
18 Mayor Hodson recessed the meeting at 8:16 p.m. to wait for the 2003 election results.
19
20 Mayor Hodson reconvened the meeting at 8:32 p.m.
21
22 VI. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL—CONTINUED
23 B. Canvass November 4, 2003 election results
24 Ms. Kroeplin stated Randy Hodson received a total 1647 votes, Mike Emmert received a total of
25 822 votes, Jerry Faust received a total of 1,234 votes, Hal Gray received a total 901 votes, Dick
26 Horst received a total of 941 votes, Julie Ann Hunter received a total of 902 votes, and Randy
27 Stille received a total of 1,217 votes. She stated there were 2,264 total votes cast and the
28 referendum was approved. She congratulated the winners of the election.
29
30 Councilmember Sparks thanked the City Clerk for all of her hard work over the years.
31
32 Mayor Hodson announced the City Clerk would be retiring next year.
33
34 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Sparks, to accept the canvass
35 of the November 4, 2003 election results as presented.
36
37 Motion carried unanimously.
38
39 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
40 None.
41
42 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS.
43 None.
44
45 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
46 Mayor Hodson declared the meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
November 4, 2003
Page 4
1 Motion carried unanimously.
2
3 Respectfully submitted,
4
5
6 Kathy Altman
7 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
8
9 Mayor
10 ATTEST:
11 City Clerk
12
13
P%RAFIelm
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
MINUTES OF CANVASS OF CITY ELECTION RESULTS
November 4, 2003
The meeting was called to order at 8:30 PM for the purpose of canvassing the November 4,
2003 City Council results.
Present: Hodson, Faust, Horst, Sparks, Thuesen
Absent: None
The following report was presented to the Canvassing Board:
2003 ELECTION RESULTS
Precinct 1H Precinct 2H Precinct 1 R Total
Mayor (4 year term)
Randy Hodson 461 914 272 1647
Write-Ins 50 93 7 150
Councilmember (4 year term)
Mike Emmert 251 465 106 822
Jerry Faust 331 706 197 1234
Hal Gray 255 539 107 901
Dick Horst 287 535 119 941
Write-Ins 2 11 5 18
Councilmember (2 year term)
Julianne Hunter 287 488 127 902
Randy Stille 323 731 163 1217
Write-Ins. 0 4 0 4
The total number of votes cast is 2,264.
Canvass Board Meeting
November 4, 2003
Page 2
Motion by Board Member Thuesen, seconded by Board Member Sparks, to approve and
certify to Hennepin and Ramsey Counties the City of St. Anthony election results of November
4, 2003.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Board Member Thuesen, seconded by Board Member Sparks, to adjourn the
meeting at 8:40 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Connie Kroeplin, City Clerk
Chair, Canvassing Board
ATTEST:
Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I certify that this is a true and accurate
copy of the City of St. Anthony records._
Date City Clerk