HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 03162004 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
102905
BOX: 27
Folder: PL PACKETS 2000-2004
Document: PL PACKET 03162004
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
March 16, 2004
7:00 pm; Council Chambers
1. Call to Order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Roll Call.
4. Approval of Agenda.
5. Meeting Minutes.
6. Communication with City Council.
6.1 Designate a Planning Commissioner to the March 23, 2004 City Council
Meeting.
7. Public Hearing.
7.1 Frank Peterson, set back variance request for property located at 2601 -
31St Avenue NE.
7.2 Tires Plus, conditional use permit and administrative subdivision for
property located adjacent to the TCF on Silver Lake Road.
8. Concept Reviews.
9. Public Input.
Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any item not included
on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their
name and address on the form at the podium, state their name and address for
the Clerk's record, and limit their remarks to five minutes.
10. Information and Discussion.
11. Announcements.
12. Adjournment.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
4
5 February 17, 2004
6 7:00 p.m.
7
8
9 I. CALL TO ORDER
10 Chair Stromgren called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
11
12 H. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
13 Chair Stromgren invited the Commission and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
14
15 III. ROLL CALL.
16 Commissioners present: Chair Stromgren; Vice Chair Hanson; Commissioners Gray,
17 Hoska,Jensen, Tillman and Young.
18
19 Absent: None.
20
21 Also present: City Manager Michael Mornson.
22
23 IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
24
25 Motion by Commissioner Gray, second by Commissioner Tillman, to approve the meeting agenda as
26 presented.
27
28 Motion carried unanimously
29
30 V. MEETING MINUTES.
31
32 5.1 Review and Approval—Planning Commission Minutes of January 20, 2004.
33
34 Commissioner Tillman stated that she had a correction on page 3, line 32. She clarified that the
35 resident,Ron Hanson lives at 3220 Belden Drive not 3220 Meldon Drive.
36
37 Commissioner Tillman stated that she had a correction on page 5, line 14. She stated that the
38 minutes indicate that she asked if the Commission is responsible for deciding on the number of
39 required spaces. She clarified that she asked if the Commission is responsible for deciding which
40 spaces were legitimate spaces on the plan. She noted that in the last sentence Mr. Mornson
41 responded by stating yes, it is up to the Commission to decide which of the spaces should come,
42 not how many are required.
43
44 Chair Stromgren stated that he had a correction on page 5, line 42. He stated that it should read
45 clarified that the lighting plans indicate lumens.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 2
1
2 Motion by Vice Chair Hanson, second.by Commissioner Young, to approve the meeting minutes of the
3 Planning Commission of January 20, 2004 as amended.
4
5 Motion carried unanimously
6
7 VI. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL
8 6.1 Designate a Planning Commission member to the February 24 2004 City Council
9 Meeting.
10
11 Chair Stromgren noted that representation at the City Council meeting on February 24, 2004
12 would not be required because there are no public hearings.
13
14 VII. PUBLIC HEARING.
15
16 None.
17
18 VIII. CONCEPT REVIEWS.
19 8.1 Frank Peterson, set back variance request for propegy located at 2601-315`Avenue
20 Northeast.
21
22 Frank Peterson stated that he and his wife are requesting an 11-foot set back variance off the side
23 of their home, facing 31 st Avenue Northeast. He explained that they are requesting the setback
24 variance because they would like to be able to build a sunroom off the side of their home. He
25 indicated that the Petersons are requesting this due to health issues noting that Mrs. Peterson
26 suffers from asthma and is restricted from being outdoors for any period of time as it restricts her
27 ability to breathe. He provided the Commission with an overview of the setback request and the
28 layout of the home as it sits on the lot.
29
30 Mr. Peterson referenced the packet information provided to the Commission stating that he and
31 his wife are asking for an 11-foot variance. He reviewed the packet with the Commission stating
32 that they scripted the house as facing Wilson so the backyard is diagonal to 315`Avenue. He
33 stated that he and his wife would like to build a small sun porch onto the front of their house. He
34 reviewed the layout of the house as it sits on the lot with the Commission noting that after they
35 reviewed the location of the house on the lot they were told they would need an 11-foot variance.
36
37 Chair Stromgren asked who had originally told them this. Mr. Peterson clarified that the City
38 Inspector told him.
39
40 Mr. Peterson explained that he and his wife are hoping to build a small 10-foot by 19-foot sun
41 porch onto the front of their house. He stated that he provided the City with diagrams that
42 included lot dimensions in addition to the dimensions for the sun porch. He reviewed the
43 location of the sun porch with the Commission noting that there are a number of homes along
44 315`that also have sun porches. He stated that it is his understanding that they would have also
45 been required to meet the 30-foot setback requirements. Chair Stromgren clarified that the
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 3
1 homes in that area were probably built prior to the installation of the curb and gutter and prior to
2 the zoning ordinance.
3
4 Chair Stromgren asked if a contractor prepared the site plan that was submitted for review. Mr.
5 Peterson confirmed that the contractor did prepare the site plan. He explained that an individual
6 by the name of Greg,who is responsible for checking the plans, stated that they would need the
7 variance.
8
9 Chair Stromgren asked if they had a survey to go by, did they find the corner monuments or did
10 they measure from the back of the curb. Mr. Peterson explained that they went based on the
11 description of the lot.
12
13 Commissioner Tillman asked.City Manager Momson if the setback is from the easement line or
14 from the curb. City Manager Morrison clarified that the setback is from the property line.
15 Commissioner Tillman asked if the property line is on the curb or in from the curb. City
16 Manager Morrison stated that it is usually in from the curb.
17
18 Commissioner Tillman stated that it is her understanding that it really doesn't matter what is the
19 front or the.side of the house because a front yard is a 30-yard setback and a side yard on a street
20 is a 30-yard setback. City Manager Morrison confirmed that this is correct.
21
22 City Manager Morrison further explained that the Building Inspector interpreted the
23 recommendation this way because had he called it a front yard setback Mr. Peterson would have
24 automatically been out of compliance with the backyard setback requirements. He explained that
25 they give the Building Inspector some latitude with interpretation on a corner lot with regards to
26 what is the front and the side of a house. He further explained that they also tell the Building
27 Inspectors to interpret it to the benefit that makes the most sense from a setback point of view.
28 He stated that the houses along Wilson are fairly even noting that the houses along 31"are not.
29 He stated that either way Mr. Peterson would need a letter for the variance. He indicated that Mr.
30 Peterson came in last fall and applied for the building permit noting that he only came forward
31 this past month expressing his interest to move forward with the variance request.
32
33 City Manager Morrison explained, for the benefit of the new Commissioners,that the purpose of
34 the Concept Review is an informal discussion between the applicants and the Commission and
35 then proceeds on to the public hearing next month. He stated that this also provides an avenue to
36 get the issues out in the open for something the Commission might want the applicants to
37 research further.
38
39 Commissioner Young asked Mr. Peterson if he had considered placing the addition along the east
40 side of the house. Mr. Peterson stated that this is his backyard area adding that he does not want
41 to have the sunroom along that side of the house. He explained that sun normally comes from
42the south side of the house. He stated that they are looking for a quiet place to sit in the evenings.
43 He noted that if they were to place it along the back they would have to access through the
44 garage, which is another reason for not placing it there. He explained that his wife has asthma
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 4
1 and that they would like to build it in an area that would be away from fumes and exhaust. He
2 stated that they did consider all sides of the house and determined this would be the best location.
3
4 Commissioner Jensen asked if they felt like they would be losing privacy by placing it at the
5 front of the house versus the side of the house. Mr. Peterson stated that they plan to sit and enjoy
6 the sun porch noting that they could install shades if they need to.
7
8 Vice Chair Hanson asked if the sunroom would be a three-season. Mr. Peterson confirmed that it
9 would be a three-season porch measuring 10-feet wide and 19-feet long. He reviewed the
10 structure with the Commission noting that it would be a nice addition to the house and enhance
11 the property.
12
13 Chair Stromgren stated that he does have some concerns with the size of the variance requested
14 noting that it is actually a 12-foot setback. He indicated that there is a math error on the site plan.
15 He reviewed stating that it is about an 18-foot setback to the proposed. Mr. Peterson clarified
16 that it was 19 feet once they put the room on so they are looking for an 11-foot variance.
17
18 Chair Stromgren stated that he is sympathetic to their desire to have the sun porch, considering
19 Mrs. Peterson's condition noting that the homes nearby are set back farther from the curb and
20 their home would be very close to the curb.
21
22 Mr. Peterson noted the homes in the area that have similar situations and reviewed with the
23 Commission. Chair Stromgren acknowledged stating that most of those homes are pre-existing.
24 Mr. Peterson reviewed the area noting that there is no consistency to the layout of the homes on
25 their respective lots.
26
27 Commissioner Tillman explained that the Commission considers certain points and requirements
28 that must be met to grant a variance and reviewed the three main criteria considered. She
29 referenced hardship stating that the Commission could possibly take into consideration the fact
30 that they really don't have any space around the living portion of the house because of the two
31 streets and the 10 foot yard being so small. She stated noted that they did not cause the situation
32 and it really isn't a hardship. She stated that the third point considered is whether the property
33' could not be put to reasonable use without the variance. She stated that this would be one of the
34 questions she would have to ask noting that this is one of the variance requirements she would
35 struggle with.
36
37 Chair Stromgren clarified that the Planning Commission does not grant the variance, they only
38 review and make recommendations to the City Council for consideration.
39
40 Vice Chair Hanson asked if they would have heating, cooling and electrical outlets installed in
41 the sun porch. Mr. Peterson explained that the only thing they would probably install is a ceiling
42 fan adding that there would not be any heating or cooling installed.
43
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 5
1 Commissioner Young asked if access to the sun porch would be directly from the house. Mr.
2 Peterson stated it would be attached to the house and directly accessible from the house and
3 outside.
4
5 8.2 Tires Plus, conditional use permit and administrative subdivision for property located
6 adjacent to the TCF on Silver Lake Road.
7
8 Dennis Knapp, General Manager for Tires Plus, Apache, stated that they are requesting a
9 Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of moving the Tires Plus Apache location. He provided
10 the Commission with packets for their review. He introduced his team noting that his partner
11 Greg Lundquist and architect John Patterson from RJM Construction are also in attendance. He
12 explained that the City notified Tires Plus on January 20, 2004 that they would have to relocate
13 their store as apart of the Northwest Quadrant Redevelopment Project. He explained that they
14 are purchasing the two lots across the street from TCF noting that they are also requesting a lot
15 split from TCF. He stated that it includes 27 feet of lot 9 and reviewed with the Commission.
16 He stated that they are proposing to purchase the additional 27 feet to alleviate any bare or open
17 space. He stated that they had to apply for a conditional use permit because they are an
18 automotive repair business and reviewed the conditions outlined in the packet with the
19 Commission.
20
21 Mr. Knapp indicated that they have to relocate their business due to changes in the
22 redevelopment plans. He indicated that he was notified in January that they would have to
23 relocate and vacate by August. He stated that they are trying to be proactive by securing these
24 lots and reviewed the application and draft layout of the store location with the Commission. He
25 indicated that they would not require any additional variances for the setbacks and that the
26 parking is more than what they need.
27
28 Mr. Knapp referenced the conditions outlined in the packet and acknowledged the concerns of
29 the Commission. He assured the Commission that they would not have any vehicles parked
30 outside overnight adding that if they do have overnight vehicles they are pulled into the garage
31 for the night. He explained that there would not be any outdoors waste storage and that the waste
32 tires would be stored in an enclosed garage. He stated that oil waste is picked up on a bi-weekly
33 basis, sometimes weekly, depending upon how busy they might be.
34
35 Mr. Knapp referenced the parking and access points stating that they are presently in negotiations
36 with TCF regarding the possibility of granting an easement for access to their location from 39th.
37 He stated that so far TCF seems to be willing to grant the easement on their parking lot and
38 reviewed the access points with the Commission. He stated that TCF has been very receptive
39 throughout the negotiation process.
40
41 Vice Chair Hanson asked if they would ask TCF for a small monument sign along 39th. Mr.
42 Knapp stated that the only sign they have actually discussed is a `No Trucks' sign coming from
43 39th into their parking lot. He stated that they could direct their deliveries to come in from Silver
44 Lake Road noting that they would work with their vendors on this issue. He stated that there
45 would be a monument sign located in front of their building, off 390'Avenue and reviewed with
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 6
1 the Commission. He stated that they have not decided on the actual location yet noting that they
2 would work out the location with the City Engineer.
3
4 Commissioner Tillman suggested that they include a listing of the conditions on their current
5 conditional use permit and on some of the other automotive businesses to give the
6 Commissioners an idea of the kinds of conditions that are applied. City Manager Mornson noted
7 that the current Tires Plus probably did not come in under a conditional use permit noting that
8 they were probably here prior to conditional use permits. He stated that the others probably do
9 adding that it is a very good suggestion.
10
11 City Manager Mornson asked for clarification on the total square footage would be for the
12 property. He stated that this is information that they should include for the public hearing. He
13 stated that they have had several meetings with Tires Plus and discussed a number of items
14 including signage and landscaping.
15
16 Chair Stromgren suggested, for the public hearing,that they address the signage and landscaping
17 in detail in addition to the site lighting. He indicated that he would like to see it shown that the
18 residential area to the east would not be impacted.
19
20 Vice Chair Hanson noted the color rendering shows trees behind their building and asked if they
21 would remain. Mr. Knapp stated that he could not guarantee that the trees would remain. He
22 indicated that it was very unlikely that there would be any trees between the two lots because.of
23 the spacing involved.
24
25 Commissioner Tillman asked which way the garages would face. Mr. Knapp stated that all
26 garages would be facing south and the building would face Silver Lake Road.
27
28 Commissioner Tillman noted the shaded reference to a building on the rendering and asked for
29 further clarification. Mr. Knapp explained that they had purchased the two lots because they
30 were not sure the building would fit on one. He stated that the architect included the area in the
31 rendering as a potential option in the future.
32
33 Vice Chair Hanson asked if there is any site cleanup required on this space of if they have done
34 any soil testing on the site. Mr. Knapp stated that the lot has been tested and is suitable for
35 building. He stated that the lot to the south might require further testing adding that it is suitable
36 for building.
37
38 Vice Chair Hanson asked if they have a total cost for the project. Mr. Knapp stated that the cost
39 would be between$550,000 to $600,000 and reviewed with the Commission.
40 -
41 Commissioner Young asked for clarification of the sign indicated on the drawing. Mr. Knapp
42 stated that they have some sign designs for the tower noting that they are still discussing the
43 brand signs. He provided the Commission with an overview noting that they are very attractive
44 signs.
45
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 7
1 Commissioner Young noted the monument sign and asked if it is on the site plan. Mr. Knapp
2 stated that it is not included at this time adding that the sign would be included for the public
3 hearing.
4
5 City Manager Mornson asked if he had brought any pictures of other stores. Mr. Knapp stated
6 that he did not have any pictures at this time.
7
8 Commissioner Jensen asked if the building would be larger or smaller than the current store. Mr.
9 Knapp stated that this would probably be smaller square footage wise and reviewed with the
10 Commission.
11
12 IX. PUBLIC INPUT.
13
14 None.
15
16 X. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION.
17
18 None.
19
20 M. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
21
22 City Manger Mornson stated that they are in the middle of the planning process for the Bulldozer
23 Bash for the Apache Redevelopment Project. He stated that the bash would be held on March
24 20, 2004 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at Apache Plaza. He indicated that there would be a
25 wonderful program, scheduled from 7:00 p.m. to 7:45 p.m. that would include speeches from the
26 Mayor and the Developer. He stated that a group of actors would also present a 20-minute skit
27 on the history of Apache Plaza adding that several of the school organizations, including the
28 choir,jazz band and orchestra would also be involved. He stated that they would also have a
29 silent auction with proceeds going towards school and community programs. He stated that they
30 are anticipating at least 1000 people would probably attend that evening noting that the City
31 would be sending out approximately 200 invitations. He indicated that they plan to make this a
32 very large Community Event.
33
34 City Manager Mornson noted that April 20`h is the scheduled date for the next Planning
35 Commission meeting.' He stated that in addition to their regular meeting a joint meeting with
36 City Council has been scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. He explained that the Mayor and City
37 Council members would present their current list of goals and discuss any issues that would be
38 addressed in the coming year.
39
40 City Manager Mornson stated that Sue Hall would be back on April 12, 2004.
41
42 XII. ADJOURNMENT
43
44 Motion by Vice Chair Hanson, second by Commissioner Gray, to adjourn the meeting at 8:30
45 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
February 17, 2004
Page 8
1
2 Motion carried unanimously.
3
4 Respectfully submitted,
5
6
7 Bonnie Sullivan
8 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
ADDRESSING THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Public Hearings.
In keeping with Roberts Rules of Order, the following
procedures apply to Public Hearings:
• Mayor/Chair asks for staff report on item and opens item,
for discussion.
• Citizens wishing to speak, should raise their hands and
approach the podium when recognized by the
Mayor/Chair, then clearly state full name and address for
the record. Spokespersons are given more time for
presentations, and groups are encouraged to use them.
• Everyone who wishes, will have a chance to address the
Council/Commission. Citizens must address all questions
and comments to the Mayor, who will then determine who
will answer them. Questions will be answered when all
persons have had a chance to speak. Only one person
may speak at a time. Citizens are urged to be polite and
quiet as comments are made to the Council/Commission.
Applauding or other displays of approval or disapproval
are inappropriate during City Council/Planning
Commission proceedings.
• No one will be given an opportunity to speak a second time
until everyone has had an opportunity to speak initially.
Please limit second presentation to new information and
not rebuttals.
• When public comments are completed, the
Council/Planning Commission closes the public hearing
and starts its own discussion. The audience is welcome to
listen quietly to the discussion but is requested not to
make comments.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM thong
ill a C%
Report Date: February 17, 2004
Meeting Date: March 16, 2004 Agenda Section: Public hearing
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Application for a variance for 2601 - 31st Avenue NE
MANAGER'S REVIEW: March 16, 2004 is a public hearing for an 11 foot-
variance request for the Frank Peterson property at 2601 - 31" Avenue NE. A
concept plan was reviewed by the Commission on February 17, 2004. The
property is in an R-1, residential, district.
Background: The property owner has filed for an 11 foot side yard variance to
allow construction of a three-season porch. The ordinance requires 30 feet
setback and the property owner will have a 19 foot setback, if the variance is
approved. The total square footage of the property is 10,475. The applicant
currently meets the requirements for lot coverage and other set back
requirements. The.Building Inspector has interpreted that a'side yard set back is
required vs. a front yard because it's a corner lot. We have the ability to interpret
the various set backs on a corner lot on what makes the most sense from a
zoning perspective.
Michael Morrison
City Manager
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM CJ�`n. thong
ilia e C7
Report Date: February 17, 2004
Meeting Date: March 16, 2004 Agenda Section: Public hearing
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Applications for a conditional use permit and
administrative subdivision for a Tires Plus Store for property described as Lot 8,
Block 7, Mounds View Acres Second Addition.
MANAGER'S REVIEW: A public hearing is scheduled for March 16 for a conditional use
permit and an administrative subdivision for a Tires Plus Store on Silver Lake Road on property
adjacent to Twin City Federal. A concept plan for the property was reviewed by the Commission
at their February 17'' meeting. The property is zoned commercial. The proposed use is a
permitted conditional use in a C district.
Background: The applicant is currently located next to the City liquor store on the west side
of Silver Lake Road. The existing building is being purchased and demolished to accommodate
the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. The following is a summary of approvals needed to
accommodate the new Tires Plus facility:
1) Approval of a conditional use permit
2) Approval of an administrative subdivision. The applicant is buying 2 lots and 27 feet off
of third lot from TCF, which is their neighbor to the north. Because part of one lot will
stay with Tires Plus and part with TCF, a public hearing is required to approve the
dividing of an existing lot.
The lot is approximately 151' by 235', or approximately 35,485 square feet. Based upon this
submitted size, no variances are required for the Tires Plus Building.
At the request of Commissioner Tillman, I have attached minutes of three previous conditional
use permit issues that are automotive-related. To summarize, some of the conditions that were
placed on previous conditional use permits were as follows:
1) Submittal of a landscaping plan, dumping enclosure, and sign plans.
2) Hours of operation
3) Limits on outdoor storage
v.
Michael Morrison
Ci ty Manager
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
NOTICE OF HEARING
Conditional Use Permit and
Administrative Subdivision
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of St.
Anthony will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 16, 2004, at 7:00 PM or
as soon thereafter as possible, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301
Silver Lake Road, for the following purpose:
Applicant: Tires Plus
Subject Property: Lot 8, Block 7, Mounds View Acres Second
Addition (property south of Twin City Federal on
Silver Lake Road)
Request: 1. Conditional use permit for automotive repair
facility
2. Administrative subdivision of the subject
property(currently owned by Twin City Federal)
Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at
said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the
Assistant City Manager at 612-789-8881. Auxiliary aids are available upon
request at least 96 hours in advance of the meeting. Please call the City Clerk at
612-789-8881 to make arrangements.
Michael Mornson
City Manager
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
March 2, 2004
Juron, Inc dba Tires Plus Apache
1315 Larpenteur Ave W.
Roseville, Mn 55113
St. Anthony Village
Planning Commission
3301 Silver Lake Rd
St Anthony, Mn 55418
February 17, 2004
Dear Planning Commission,
We are applying for a Conditional Use Permit on Lot 8, Block 7, Mounds View Acres
Second Addition, for the purpose of moving our Tires Plus Apache location. On January
. 20'', 2004 the City of St Anthony and Mike Mornson officially notified us that we would
have to relocate our business because of the Northwest Quadrant Redevelopment.
We have been offering the community automotive repair for over twenty years at the
Apache location. Through these years we have gained a loyal customer base and
developed great friendships in the community. Many of our guests rely on us not only for
repairing their vehicles but also keeping the records of their maintenance. Many have
voiced their concern with us as to our situation and are worried that we will no longer be
able to provide them the services they need for their cars.
In 1996 we renewed our lease with the City on the property, despite the mall's
deterioration, because we felt a loyalty to our customers and the community. A few years
ago, we invested over$60,000 in the interior of our showroom to help freshen the look of
the store. Throughout the years we have maintained a clean environment, making sure
vehicles are picked up on a timely basis, and disposing of our product properly.
The redevelopment that we were originally shown included us in what was termed
" Automotive Row". We were excited to see the changes and glad to be part of the
project. Last fall, we learned that there would be no"Automotive Row" and that we were
not part of the plans for the redevelopment. Being proactive, we secured the two lots
across the street from our current location in hopes of building a new store and
continuing our relationship with the community. We are here today to apply for a
Conditional Use Permit for Lot 8 (lot south of TCF Bank). We hope that you will grant us
this permit so we can continue our positive relationship with St. Anthony.
Sincerely,
Dennis Knapp
General Manager Tires Plus Apache
CD
0
Date: Fee: $130.00 0
M
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Applicant: 'IBES t���S SPA Phone:&51
Address: 3809 511"e.&- LV- Sd �4�
, ST dAW ;'
0
Status of applicant (owner, buyer, renter, agent, etc.): OL�1nC2 '
N
O
Street address and/or legal description of property in question:
L.o+ a , . r3Lo�1L 7 . AO-A&®4 4%6%J Qom& 5&4wo A0D11)01-'j Ids-eY Co#An!,
Zoning district in which property is located: C " GE*> L �',oaw►eac.�at-- ��f1'e.t�T
Conditional use proposed: l o A, QtCMT IV1pniP, F.EPMIL- 13WAInI:SS
Minnesota Statutes and City Ordinances. require that the following conditions be satisfied
before a conditional use may be authorized. Please respond to these conditions, using
additional sheets, if necessary.
1) The proposed conditional use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the
zoning district in which it is to be located.
See R}�+c.�v►ne,✓�fi
2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to propertv'values or
improvements in the vicinity.
wee � �T
3) The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to
provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will
contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community.
SU T
—IaSignature of applicant: AW&AL-
Attachment for Application for Conditional Use Permit
1. According to Section 1635.03 Permitted Conditional Use, Item(d) Auto repair
which includes no storage of autos for parts.
2. We believe the only items in question would be the storage of waste oil and waste
tires. The waste oil is stored above ground inside the building in an approved
waste oil container and removed weekly from our location. The tires are stored in
our enclosed garage complete with roof and door, and they are also removed
weekly.
3. See attached letter.
ftb-uu-M4 MUN ?2,e1 FM E G f%UU & SPNS INC FAH NO. 7637666007 P, 01
H:104PItW\0er797 TIRES PLL`;\Bw6El OW0.219'210t 12:48 47 P11.j.ry
• .....,• --s- c:c_ s a.r.ss w maw,_
w � I '
ed'e.=__ ��__� __���,�...__--_=_�s:s.s-.-�'.-..L�®ra•P a+e en�as__._�.�:L•^�='.__.-_�'c:�:o':m...-..�_>r.__-.-'.Fs�s�.:::x
- - --- _._.-.__ -- �- ----
, ani r r�— ^-•!� —_,_�
! \ 1 eR
\\ . S I
T4-
Y4.
4.
3*ta 2t L•!' •i1Tr-
.7i hh OL18��--L-..-.__ \ �. e p-_. l�j•y'�II _. 1 .� `T:'e:- a T -
+ - :' C�i 'y�pa�e�'�Yc• rf�'�+.'�*�•e � to Y _!�.•t'�'�' l
To-
-'__ 's':^- •s_a:r_:�= ' .�y._.mm ••.rv-�r:.am�.n-:.�.....3�r•wo.:e� r :- ! r +l • .�..........�f�c����..:i�:i.
=y''�r'r +fin�.. ��.•riw sy wro m. ' nr•.rso •�!�✓Y�.Wr iOl 8 OUY ils.ww wrr a YOO Mid.�m m 1�aw�• ' --�--.�.; _ '__
l •� 1 Jam,/ I 1':;...
� ♦ i t 1 Q I !
04.
11 1 I 1"1 1 1\ I 1 •_ 'm T— II �K,I 1
� I 1 11 1 11. 1 I i1 ! � •r. 1 I<OIh,..-,'••` /,.'. '`�
•�t 1 •, I l l l l \ ._,. I .—..__ rr � 1
j��,..'o••::��'!'::1;..';:;:,;'13':::::'.
`I IV 1 '1 t V 1 1 1 1.\ �\ j/ -._...._.. rj 't"^ 1. 1 N1� /r;.{":.':.[-.`.••....'.
\\ \\ I .__ /�
-r=---•—'� 1 ---- 00
It
'� ` 11 `; '.i 'i ! $lye �1 / __'-�r --�- I � '�ii: ��� •
r � iill i ! 1\
pla
Fq?
1Zt `s.�.e.�`•�e�lli+. +wl�'a�stsw�q`. I..�r.-17
1
1 soo•Po 111"s I 15f.23
��
1 f 1 I I
zr I I EXISTING GARAGE
1\ 1}aroma, 5' I I
Planning Commission Minutes
June 21, 1994
Page 6
1 to 9:00 P.M.; Faust, 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.; Horst, no time restrictions; Makowske,
2 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.; and Gondorchin, 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M..
3 Commissioner Franzese inquired if Firestone is restricted to 8:00 P.M. by conditional
4 use. Mr. Hamer answered that Firestone has been.in that location for a long time and
5 he would have to research the answer to that question. After further discussion, the
6 Commission's consensus was that Saturday hours would be 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.
7 and the Commissioners were split as to the business being open on Sundays.
8 Motion by Faust, second by Makowske to recommend Council approval of the
9 conditional use request by Karen Rosar, a franchise holder for Exhaust Pro and Fast
10 Glass, to open a repair establishment at 4000 Silver Lake Road with the following
11 conditions:
12 1. Submittal by the applicant the plans for the aesthetic improvements for the
13 structure, plans for the landscaping and driveway, dumpster enclosure and
14 signage plans.
15 2. That the hours of operation will be Monday through Friday from 7:00 A.M.
16 until 8:00 P.M.; Saturday from 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.. (Note that half the
17 Commissioners voted for open on Sunday and half voted against being open on
18 Sunday).
19 3. The signage would.be one of the monument styles; with no pylons.
20 4. That vehicle storage be limited to not more than two vehicles to be stored out
21 side the building and not to exceed 72 hours.
22 Commissioner Franzese added as a friendly amendment to the motion that there was no
23 opposition to this request, however, the residents from the Townhomes across Silver
24 Lake Road were present and addressed their three concerns of signage, hours, and
25 outside vehicle storage. Commissioner Faust accepted the amendment.
26 Motion carried unanimously.
27 Chair Gondorchin urged Mr. and Mrs. Rosar to attend the City Council meeting on June 28th
28 for the final commitment of their conditional use permit.
29 B. Belair Builders, sign variance for Medical Professional Building, at 39th
30 Avenue N.E. and Silver Lake Road.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 1996
Page 2
1 Temporary 3.2 Beer Park Permit:
2 Central Park, July 4, 1996/Orloski Family Picnic
3 Motion carried unanimously.
4 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
5 Motion by Wagner, second by Enrooth to approve the following claims:
6. A. American Bank in the amount of$10,016.25 for registered interest, in the amount of
7 $13,935.00 for registered interest, and in the amount of$22,657.50 for registered interest.
8 B. Rieke Carroll Muller. Inc. in the amount of$2,800.00 for professional services rendered
9 May 1, 1996 to May 31, 1996.
10 C. 4 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
11 Councilmember Enrooth questioned check#2491 to Zaworksi in the amount of$15.00. City
12 Manager Mornson stated he would investigate.
13
14 Motion carried unanimously.
15 VII. REPORTS.
16 A. Planning Commission- June 18, 1996.
1. St. Anthony Unocal 76 Service Station:
18 a. Conditional Use Permit
19 Planning Commissioner Bergstrom was present at the meeting to report on three requests
20 made by Mr. Roger Bona, owner of the Unocal 76 Service Station, 28122-27th Avenue
21 NE. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 18, 1996, to consider a
22 conditional use permit request to allow Mr. Bona to build an addition to his existing
23 service station to increase the number of repair bays. The proposed expansion is 5,613
24 square feet and requires an additional 19 parking spaces. Mr. Bona is proposing to install
25 21 parking spaces on site and to construct 14 additional parking spaces on an adjacent
26 piece of property that he recently purchased. The Planning Commission had met with
27 Mr. Bona and his architect in May for a concept review of the proposal. Staff
28 recommended approval of the conditional use permit based on the following three
29 conditions:
30 1. The parking areas must have striping for all the proposed parking spaces.
31 2. No more than 10 cars stored on the site for no more than 48 hours. This would
32 also include the parking area across the alley from the business.
33 3. Change the property address to reflect the business frontage on Kenzie Terrace.
1 Bergstrom reported that just prior to the Planning Commission meeting on June 18, 1996,
.,5 he was presented with a petition signed by fifteen residents in the neighborhood
36 requesting that the present shrub plantings in the berm on 27th Avenue be removed and
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
June 25, 1996
Page 3
1 replaced with Evergreens or Juniper trees planted 4 to 5 feet apart. The intent would be
2 to provide a visual screen and also muffle the noise of the service station. Management
3 Assistant Moore-Sykes had noted that historically the City had owned the property where
4 the berm was located and had done the planting. The property has since been turned over
5 to Mr. Bona with the understanding that he would maintain it. Mr. Bona had estimated it
6 would cost$1,000.00 to remove the existing plantings and replace them with Evergreen
7 trees.
8 Bergstrom reported the Planning Commission discussed the difficulty of enforcing Staff
9 condition#2 regarding the storage of cars on site. They also discussed hours of operation
10 of the service station. Mr. Bona stated he had no intention of changing the hours of
. 11 operation. Mrs. Beverly Stafford, resident,testified at the public hearing that she likes
12 the service station, enjoys the traffic and hearing the engines wind up.
13 Bergstrom stated the Planning Commission is recommending City Council approval of
14 the conditional use permit based on the following conditions:
15 1.. The parking areas must have striping for all the proposed parking spaces.
2. No vehicles may be stored on-site to be specifically used for the purpose of
17 extracting spare parts and/or on-site long-term storage.
18 3. Change the property address to reflect business frontage on Kenzie Terrace.
19 4. Consideration of incorporating the use of Evergreen landscaping on a consensus
20 basis of the parties of Mr. Bona,the neighbors who have submitted a petition and
21 the City of St. Anthony.
22 Bergstrom added that based on his personal experience, Mr. Bona is an exemplary
23 business citizen of the community.
24 . Councilmember Faust asked if residents adjacent to or abutting the property had testified
25 at the public hearing. Bergstrom stated there were no residents opposed to the expansion.
26 The only request was for the Evergreen plantings.
27 Mayor Ranallo questioned the definition of"long-term" in regard to car storage.
28 Bergstrom explained the intent was to prevent cars from being stored on the site for the
29 purpose of stripping them for parts.
30 Mr. Roger Bona stated the current restriction for car storage is no more than 10 to 14 days
�. and that has been comfortable. Any less than that could be harmful to his business.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
June 17, 1997
Page 6
1 concerns of the neighbors but felt that Mr. Rosar could be a good neighbor. He stated he was
2 in support of granting the conditional use permit and letting Mr. Rosar do all the business he
3 can.
4 Commissioner Gondorchin stated he felt Mr. Rosar is the best judge of the possibility that
5 there are too many car washes in the area. It is his investment. He stated CUB Foods was
6 the generator of additional traffic and he did not feel this proposal would generate that much
7 more traffic. He stated he would like to revisit the restrictions of the conditional use permit
8 and determine the hours of operation.
9 Motion by Chair Bergstrom to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for
10 operation of a car wash and for expansion of a permitted use for Exhaust Pros, 4000 Silver
11 Lake Road subject to the following conditions:
12 1. Submittal of a plan for aesthetic improvements to the structure including landscaping,
13 driveway, dumpster enclosure and signage plan to be implemented within six months
14 of plan approval;
15 2. Hours of operation for the Exhaust Pros shop (not including the car wash) be Monday
16 through Friday from 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. and Saturday from 7:00 A.M. to 5:00
17 P.M.;
3 3. That signage be limited to a monument sign and a pylon sign is not allowed; and,
19 4. Outdoor vehicle storage be limited to two vehicles for a period not to exceed 72 hours.
20
21 Commissioner Gondorchin asked if a condition had been put on the hours of operation for the
22 car wash.
23 Chair Bergstrom stated the car wash would be allowed to operate 24 hours per day.
24 Commissioner Franzese noted six months would be December. She questioned if the
25 landscaping should be required sooner.
26 Mr. Rosar stated he could not install the landscaping until construction was completed. He
27 stated he would be willing to post a cash escrow for twice the cost of the improvements.
28 Chair Bergstrom stated this was not a routine requirement of the City and he did not feel it
29 should be required of Mr. .Rosar.
30 Commissioner Franzese questioned the turn lanes, especially the one nearest to Silver Lake
31 Road. She asked that the City monitor this as it may have to be modified to a right turn only
32 exit.
33 Mr. Rosar noted this is a private driveway and cannot be regulated.
Date: February 9, 2004
Fee: $150.00
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION/APPROVAL
Applicant: TCF National Bank Phone: 612-661-6937
Address: 801 Marquette Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55402
Status of Applicant: (Owner, Buyer, Renter, Agent, etc.): Owner
Present Legal Description of Property to be.Affected: Lots 8, 9 and 10, except the last 60 feet
thereof, in Block 7 Mounds View Acres Second Addition
Proposed Legal Description of Property to be Affected: See attached
Street Address: 3899 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, Minnesota
Zoning District in Which Property if Located:
Specify Any Necessary Easements: None
Area of the Subdivision: Parcel 1-52 264 sg. ft.: Parcel 2: 35.690 sg. ft. (87,954 total)
Number of Parcels: 2
Attach a copy of the proposed plat showing the proposed name of the plat, the location within the
City, the names of the present owners, the scale, the date of preparation, the northpoint,
surrounding property, all public utilities and easements and other such necessary information or
documentation as is requested by the City Manager or the subdivision/platting ordinance.
02 - 10 -04 * 150 s00CK
CODE REVIEW DRAWING INDEX ® 33
GH.ERAL _
{p
I DI A
6-001 TALE 81FST � ��
• §0
L
Ll I
TECT{STAL
FLO
ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA ::p. °FLAWe�OM
. "LM
Av
—W�
fill
INSPECTION AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS GENERAL NOTES DRAFTING SriBOLS PROJECT TEAM 11 a
r DO MOI IGLLE ORAE.rO! 9TFIBOL DE9g21PTION mTlR
raumaa r a.i oxea M
om,.ooJr.cr NOAIM
o�mrri�wa,u.w�i,urfOeire�p
rasa.m,mc+a.ra �- domu al�rau
O�HRLL C�ITReGTOp
auoeno cesera um� "u.r.uc.ere _
-
•.
1xo Foal MFIBER ` „"""'
i waw+aunn emw.m naw erm AWNTECT OI RECOM
rrl OAF �r®Abrf.nRN.GP molaaWR ndfRer'aM w4
M:CnW FEFEFEFCE u _
CML EW04EER 9 =Y
" E�vailwJ��J� N� g
LOCATION MAP d
r�--�-- GeralL FESEI�a�9�gLE STM=T tAL&W=R
Mv. woman
------ ar oau.mn wmvcTwr
M CTMCAL ENWMR
IXbi.ELEVAiIW F6E gY OleloN.pp,o fie.-i�p
PAFfIT10N TTPE RESEl1eE
JW
O
—W BY
I�TNOIE
OemIDOL TYPE FfFCFENCE
o RE�&w R3EFE CE 0-001
x �/ I`/ ' 0 01 q
0 �/ q
4 _ L
4
OI OR
I I i
I
I
I
_-
I I I
t� of s
I I 9
�F
- � I
6 C I
I�T�fYbd1—lJ� 4 � I I
I I
I I I
I I
O
I
I �
I
I I I
4
G
I I I
il'4 tP'-p P'_p
99 f'-p
�Y
4 N
R E 11RO PLlls
D ^�3 B—BAT BONE BUILDING � a a� .�tla �7 r`]` Fendler
9 5T.ANTHONY,YIYMESOTA B5§f[6 �Slonnn
o _ a��`I DESIGNIjilll N`YIPA"
CO R PS
U.
i _ FMR PLAN R ROOF PIAN d., ( •._.'d•n• ,
ate aY ems„ �
„oma x ¢axewx�
p h ¢av awxcarsccv.¢.a C
s ss.) iF'
i
7fC 7•—.-.------ °
u'zu
ILU
oh�cw�............
MMIOR
' ••,_a N axiom eas-ssr m nic cir
ho
1
p:f°w" nwvxc-� Q
SIONAOE
._
CALCULATIONS A 8
— — —,ix rte
m, ,uaaxw mart w/,• e pt
.a¢acvim,e lu u. «a,urzs cuss �F g
b xouus caxc ux €�t e
t
�sxw a
aao enu sawn �'`9Yip -
uo arwsvan xm srtomin.a
icmar.r euro
.�_............. .........:..........,............. .,...,.....-........,....,...•.... _._.--...............,....•... .. .......-.,._........•..... .......-...._.... .,. ..... ale-
..L.J. .t...t .L...f r.i...r .J r...L...r. ..L.f.:t...Y...., 1.r..i...f.ra...r..i...i r.t..f L...i..a...i....i...it�T..t
......L.:r:T•t
...f..l'�i.T a"i `i _^,r:•a::'i'.Y=r. .. .:�'. Y:^r�•'L�`i:•a^.:':•"_Y'ra'_"r+' .r ••.L.. L-,.J'T;.�•
.r }
aiCNLR iwwa
�,����i .. :<:>:.:::...:J:.:•:..t:'�:�:�t:Y:.�:.:<:r:.:�':.r:.:-:.:::>.. ...::x..:^.::t::..:�:.:.:>:.:•:.:<.t:.:�:..::>:.::..<:.:•:.R:)�:,',:.:t:%,:�:,:t:>.:-:..::.:.:�:.:<:••:::,:.:�:.�:::.:::.:<:i:.:�:,:t:l:.:::.:::,:.::, YllYaN¢W[w/I
^ate, r®ni1Ev Q
■ �yINARY EYTERIOR M"AMIM N9 F
�'y 9
rrL�
l t
'a—......_... acrerma
,_............. ._. moan iwxo arca
sa,wx rt
xoxa
nPREt�mINARY EKTERIOR ELEMON A-201
Itl�s
uuWJBE SOIBGItE
wrwurtB LauTKns
TERES PLUS
Sr. ANTHONY
,s'PABKI SETBACK Y I NINMSOTA
W WILDING SETBACK `� •• " " " .
6830 SO FT ••
FFC 9558
u I b�+s11aRIBIY�.d K�}m'r -
Of
'� / y •YA6MK�LL
_
. _ . UONTM WFE
adk
ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
E1.0
<
w- '1
r._T1RE5'-PLUS
Jar , MN 1 y t S P I g
I rrr 'll n11001 n''.-0 0
' 1 ' NB925 f4 --P35 BO>, aro 7y ✓ I Pln d e - elm A. ,�
� I I
a9UMNC 517B1IX � � 0. '� of i✓
44
---- ----- — I ------------ v1c77nTr MAP
i L_1______ ____________eemso n_______ L J d _ _}_______
I I I glue r, _!1_
I •. I I I I �.; � I
F,—I �y;q i PARING RE4UI2®' PARKING PROWDRD
FUTURE OFFICE SITE
N
; I I ..7y � f� � i •,+ � ���) ; I 4oTLL x6Vy®-66 MLL HGCmm.+n
--Ex.Choln Link Fen�e
1 I
I
SETBACKS
926"20"6 60.0 euoAwa %+ a
2� � . ' raoxr eua eme
h ,YIr "t + ._ <Y 'a',S 1 •CYs_PASONG
1A91fX ramie to la e
I r I I •.:�} �.•,' fiq rw � [ .4��,I c �xx,,.Y lo•e '� ..
I PA
� • I I AI i I d / ' %/ , ... :. .� ��'�:.�:;�:'i...�.� � I I °I PWHI4D 1'tiUN Unf Nt[
._�T :._._.�._L7:;,._._.
yj l eA/ 0. fes_ , I I.He R/llOpf
1
!of FICE
LF �Ell
__-__OOP--'--- —'—
1 'I I NB9'27'22"6 29578 --'--'---------- -
,
1 1 •1 I I I I I I
� , I I I '�1 , RCLIPIPYO MNII!
I I I I I !
I
Pvrr Pl.vfdm tl 1��.na!a w wm•..�Nwr q x...wm GRAP7DC SCALE
yv. p�-�� �Im.r�w.`o0- u..�bslw`�'re.d. er�aax®wro DENNIS KNAPP SHEET
yy, PLokwNa I315 L VEWFUR AY&SURE B
RO ^�
xrf r¢ 1 Iia )° .SEVIIJE N 5511J
(v
Y
i C,Gi �✓:N��Jlal�-J0.13 f1!!)�eYrda _ J i/DI rn!
PRONE.'(BS IJ B�2-157J
-
'4'- 1 A - �3Y�rE ,.11lf
'MMM
� ._ t
T1 RES PLUS' �' :.,w :F: . ' rt .
HN
EMS_.,.
I 1 I r
F. ----------- rr m aeromn exam\ej°°
�____ ___ __�,��______ SILT FEND
sem m n .
I I ,
I , I
I 1 I
I i
it
I 0
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
-Ex. Chain Link Fe4e
M r 1
' I I R� �� a tido C'<fF `�' -f•1 A � _ 6� li
- I I\I a I 62a�56.Y" .{ i .e.% /I /08i'"I VI ✓' I I � °m.
I
m'' I rrr smp OOF r'1'I'1 I f ammet eamt r avc
Z/-
--au - -ae!_.
— I eab , LEGEND:
I 1 �;/q/ � /•�/i i � __--'' ���————— / I � O_ /' 1) Denotes Direction of Droinoga
——) fsg 2) — Denotes Proposed Contour
1 1 .g•\'\\ '6 --/+---- --„'-- `--- I rs•ae�n'a.�vlaxlro 3 — —Denotes Existing Contour
/ �, soar eriio .�wnm a ma I�sw w/ 4—S—Denolea Silt Fence
I 7 r �———1-�———-913—— �11 Sl
X955.80 Denotes Proposed Spot Oewtion
I i _ _ / r qqK 6 x m Denotes ExistingSpot Ela tion
�- -------------- 1 \� 7—�r— Denotes ExistinSanitary Sewer
_______-------------------
--------
____
xprp`3 I s»�o B
' Denotes ExistingWoterm
aln
/ „ Denotes Existing Storm
awer` 0— Denotes Proposed Sanitary
S
111 — Denote.Proposed Watnln\% 2 Denotes Proposed Stom
s mr nweorc a—w, r n.ngr.�ar uw w.dm�w.a..r h m.>Mme GRAPHIC SCALE
77 .MeaOur�rbrt
DDENNIS KNAPP SHEET
e GAGV3. PLOaWaaFmc-ryrmas6w111v aNmFrrr�Eleta/VG '�' I o•'�) - urs LARPOWRO? /
a
R0SEVULF NN 5513 /L(m) PHONE'
(6511 642-1523
•w.�$� 4 +r L, J4i �S_•`• JI.: ! [ ' 'JI �\ J ,�l�f"i�+ _ .
r^' '� i C t� a ��^+� i�, �. � 9S� �i„+•iii rS {��\�' r� -�z9
Ail
t_1��Tt
t�-��y. ,Frac J��� °- � �j s• ��3 •�, {(�[p��y�';,..a � � ��.I ��i
q
'�.'J/y�.� r��1�9f4 tRo�+ fy
1 E�,ttS jt; y ► ■
L7� L
�3tJ> C7 -
'}'h� � ql
IS
�,�� • r r_•rr r - � — I,- � _ a
s I ■ •) )
� r
gn
k � I�z
i -�
rY"yf��li F �rr i1 u'f 11; wy„H- t yF����! R r j ■
4f
aq
��
i
r,a� raR L � a y '' FJF' ■
1��Myy■�1_ , ��' t71.
'r
�yr7�r ��� ��; Z�.s� tJ 9�, � • n
a�G'�Fa � �Y'3' f J ri. • ■
a6� +° � I rte, ■
�. _ .,_ ,,,. :� �•. s .� ,�,;,,:,: r as,a...�:� ,. ._� �,,— - _
`y
��� ` J, .
.�`.
t
i .i3
1 R
1� (����
�'
y
•.l
l
�y
'{
4
4
Y
li
�;;
f
. < .
.�
;. r..
:�, w
�„ ,
c=
s
�� �j
.�
y
n �
� �����
,.
� ,
i S
i
i
'oNK-k'^ LP,y S_lLxxs�c.•ari, '^7�'
Y � -y� g472
µ 4
�. � �1.•tom. _ f' �..
f
Similar elevation facing West (Silver Lake Road) 49
a
is S'" ice., e"�✓L'3$ `r .}F` r K
' � � 7-.' � k` ���� •H'."'91E" �4.� -�' s.,�=\gyp i
Elk ■ ■W isi IMI ` ,J,4."
- �l- .T�1-.' tY- �s''4 -[i,Y� `� „-r"AC!a'•� t �.Sd� yS Y.
T: t
',,<." .•�� e.�vw 7.y'N...,. tw�-err'�.,,,c,,.1-1.-3,.Fr-�p����`,,,5� ",'- o c�,�...: r,� �si
x:
Similar elevation facing South4l
.�N..�-,•;.: T-,:.J�...7:.�: .�y_�•::._.4":r. Fes,,..-:: _�..-_..._____..�__ ._�`"""_f• :�ta �_S{3'y:�" l�i"�"F`cc,..� -�'. �'�.� �Fi
"d
JY -
_,
y�4• p � 1 I
r
R
Similar elevation of monument sign 49
d ..I-;:�•.7ZS .Ya.xi�`? -.� '
� r v '.�r'� 7 _��� ...-� t.a"'i-�r'C:.�`"�,e•�.TSS _'.�z���"�` ^'�'} ��x1°" �����j��F.
--e%'r-ti� re _� y'� .ff'�''��' i'Sd�ti�'-•."` g,�- +s�fi 3• i �� "�dC..."�,,'�'}ai �i����+��`v,. 1 -
r u� ��� r���`�F�-��a'i�•t�; 3-.�gr➢ cra-s�s•i'3'. r 5. x.��5. 41°zrt�"�*' �'a�fi�'..,S+�- 1� :y 1 ,,
4
y'�S�-."���F e3��1 •��Y'� Jw� �•'Cen.�,«—
�
_7M
wF3 R
Tnj
�: \� �, t•,,. - _:;rte
'—
Similar elevation of entry 4