HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 03082016
Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is sustainable, safe and secure.
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, discussion, and possible action on all of the following items:
I. Approval of the March 8, 2016, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.)
II. Proclamations and Recognitions
III. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approval of February 9, 2016, City Council meeting minutes. (pp.1-5)
B. Licenses and Permits. (pp.7-8)
C. Claims. (pp.9-13)
D. Resolution 16-024 a resolution approving Amended East Metro SWAT Joint Powers Agreement.
(pp.15-25)
E. Accepting Fire Relief’s Recommendation of No Change in Pension Benefit. (pp.27-29)
IV. Public Hearing.
2016 Street & Utility Improvement Project
A. Resolution 16-025 a resolution Ordering Improvements for the 2016 Street and Utility
Improvements. Todd Hubmer, City Engineer presenting. (pp.31-45)
B. Resolution 16-026 a resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for the 2016 Street
and Utility Improvements. Todd Hubmer, City Engineer presenting. (pp.47-50)
V. Reports from Commission and Staff.
A. Resolution 16-027 a resolution accepting Findings From the Study For the Purpose of Considering
Amendments to the City Zoning Code Regarding the Regulation of Medical Cannabis Manufacturers
and Cannabis Facilities. Bob Foster, Planning Commissioner Presenting. (pp.51-76)
B. Ordinance 2016-01 an ordinance Amending Chapter 152.008 and Chapter 152.188 pertaining to
Cannabis (Marijuana) Facilities. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.77-80)
VI. General Business of Council.
A. Resolution 16-028 a resolution Awarding a Bid for the 2016 Street and Utility Improvements.
Todd Hubmer, City Engineer presenting. (pp.81-83)
B. Resolution 16-029 a resolution Authorizing Participation in the 2016-2017 GreenCorp Program.
Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.85-87)
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
MARCH 8, 2016
7:00 p.m.
HRA meeting immediately after
council meeting
Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is sustainable, safe and secure.
C. 2016 Strategic Plan. (motion only) Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.89)
D. St. Anthony Fire Department Annual Report. Mark Sitarz, Fire Chief presenting. (pp.91-99)
E. St. Anthony Liquor Department Annual Report. Mike Larson, Liquor Operations Manager
presenting. (pp.101-109) VI. Reports from City Manager and Council members.
VII. Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda.
Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the
podium, state their name and address for the Clerk’s record, and limit their remarks to five minutes.
Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may
typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an
upcoming agenda.
VIII. Information and Announcements.
IX. Adjournment.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 1
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 2
FEBRUARY 9, 2016 3
4
CALL TO ORDER. 5
6
Mayor Pro Tem Jenson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7
8
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 9
10
Mayor Pro Tem Jenson invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 11
12
Present: Mayor Pro Tem Jenson, Councilmembers Brever, Gray, and Stille 13
Absent: Mayor Faust 14
Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey, City Engineer Todd Hubmer, and Planning Commission 15
Chair Jim Gondorchin 16
17
18
CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 19
ITEMS. 20
21
I. APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 9, 2016, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 22
23
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Brever, to approve the City 24
Council Meeting Agenda of February 9, 2016. 25
26
Motion carried 4-0. 27
28
II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS - NONE 29
30
III. CONSENT AGENDA 31
32
A. Approval of January 26, 2016, City Council meeting minutes 33
B. Licenses and Permits 34
C. Claims 35
36
Motion by Councilmember Brever, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve the Consent 37
Agenda items as presented. 38
39
Motion carried 4-0 40
41
IV. PUBLIC HEARING - NONE 42
43
V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF 44
45
A. Resolution 16-018 a Resolution Approving 1.5 Foot Variance, To Build a New Garage 46
Closer to the Property Line than Currently Exists at 2841 Coolidge Street. 47
48
Planning Commission Chair Jim Gondorchin reviewed the applicant (Jason & Lisa Johnson) 49
requests a variance to construct an addition to the garage that would encroach 3.2 feet into the 50
1
required side yard setback to result in a side yard depth of 1.8 feet. The applicant’s request for a 1
variance from the side yard setback to allow for the construction the garage addition is 2
reasonable, per the findings listed in City Code. Upon variance criteria review, it was determined 3
all criterion were met. The Planning Commission met on January 25, 2016, held a public hearing 4
and recommended approval. 5
6
Councilmember Stille asked if the garage addition is part of an overall house remodel and Mr. 7
Gondorchin stated it is. Councilmember Stille asked if there are two points of access to the alley. 8
Mr. Gondorchin stated the applicant looked at putting the garage in the back of the property but 9
determined that was not feasible. 10
11
Mike from Swedo Properties & Design, stated the garage would be accessible from the front. An 12
addition would be constructed off the back of the home and be attached to the garage. A 13
bedroom, master bath, living room and mudroom would be added to the home. 14
15
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Brever, to approve Resolution 16
No. 16-018; a Resolution approving a variance from the required yard setback in order to 17
construct a larger garage at the property located at 2841 Coolidge Street. 18
19
Motion carried 4-0 20
21
VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL 22
23
A. Resolution 16-019 a Resolution Calling for a Hearing for the 2016 Street and Utility 24
Improvements. 25
26
City Engineer Todd Hubmer reviewed this resolution sets a public hearing to be held on March 27
8, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. On January 27, 2016, bids for the 2016 Street and Utility Improvement 28
Project were opened. The low bid received for the project was $2,060,276.95, this total does not 29
include separate quotes received for railroad crossing and street lighting improvements of 30
approximately $154,000, for a total construction cost of approximately $2,215,000. The total 31
cost of the improvement as presented to Council when seeking approval of plans, which includes 32
engineering, legal, and administrative fees was $2,700,000. The St. Anthony Village portion of 33
this project is anticipated to be approximately $1,465,000. This is a cooperative project with the 34
City of Columbia Heights. 35
36
Councilmember Stille asked for confirmation that Columbia Heights needs to approve their 37
aspect of this project. Mr. Hubmer stated that is true. 38
39
Motion by Councilmember Brever, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 40
16-019; a Resolution Calling for Hearing for the 2016 Street and Utility Improvements. 41
42
Motion carried 4-0 43
44
B. Resolution 16-020 a Resolution Declaring the Costs to be Assessed and Ordering 45
Preparation of the Proposed Assessments for the 2016 Street and Utility Improvement 46
Project. 47
48
2
City Engineer Todd Hubmer reviewed this resolution declares the amount to be assessed to be 1
approximately $350,000 and allows preparation for the proposed assessment roll. 2
3
Councilmember Stille asked if this has been awarded to the contractor and Mr. Hubmer stated 4
the contract will be awarded in March. 5
6
Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 16-7
020; a Resolution Declaring the Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of the Proposed 8
Assessments for the 2016 Street and Utility Improvements. 9
10
Motion carried 4-0 11
12
C. Resolution 16-021 a Resolution Calling a Hearing on the Proposed Assessments for the 13
2016 Street and Utility Improvements. 14
15
City Engineer Todd Hubmer reviewed this resolution sets an assessment hearing to be held on 16
March 8, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. 17
18
Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Brever, to approve Resolution 19
16-021; a Resolution Calling a Hearing on the Proposed Assessments for the 2016 Street and 20
Utility Improvements. 21
22
Motion carried 4-0 23
24
D. Resolution 16-022 a Resolution Approving the City of St. Anthony’s 2016 Pay Equity 25
Implementation Report 26
27
City Manager Casey reviewed the 1984 Local Government Pay Equity Act (Minnesota Statutes 28
471.991 to 471.999) requires that the City of St. Anthony file a pay equity report with the State 29
of Minnesota. The law was instituted to eliminate sex-based wage inequities in compensation 30
and benefits for local governments. Per the Local Government Pay Equity Act, the City of St. 31
Anthony is required to submit a report to the State of Minnesota every three years. The 2016 32
report for the 2015 calendar year was submitted January 28, 2016, prior to the deadline of 33
January 31, 2016. After calculating the City’s pay equity report for 2015, the City of St. Anthony 34
is confident that the City will be in compliance with the State of Minnesota pay equity mandate 35
for the 2015 calendar year. The City will be notified formally by the State of Minnesota 36
regarding compliance later on this year after they have had an opportunity to review this 37
information. 38
39
Motion by Councilmember Brever, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 40
16-022; a Resolution approving the City of St. Anthony’s 2015 Pay Equity Implementation 41
Report. 42
43
Motion carried 4-0 44
45
E. Resolution 16-023 a Resolution approving the Joint Powers Agreement for New Voting 46
System Acquisition and Operation. 47
48
3
City Manager Casey reviewed this past summer the City of St. Anthony along with the other 1
municipalities in Ramsey County approved a resolution to proceed with the Hart Verity voting 2
system. Ramsey County has completed negotiations with Hart Intercivic regarding the Hart 3
Verity voting system and has created the Joint Powers Agreement. The new voting equipment 4
will be used starting at the State Primary August 9, 2016. 5
6
Councilmember Stille mentioned this is a Joint Powers Agreement with Arden Hills, Falcon 7
Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, 8
North Oaks, North St. Paul, Roseville, St. Paul, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, and White Bear 9
Lake, White Bear Township, along with St. Anthony. 10
11
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Brever, to approve Resolution 12
16-023; a Resolution authorizing Joint Powers Agreement for New Voting System Acquisition 13
and Operation. 14
15
Motion carried 4-0 16
17
F. St. Anthony Administration Department Annual Report 18
19
City Manager Casey provided a Power Point presentation summarizing the Administration 20
Department Annual Report for 2015. Mr. Casey noted there are 58 full-time positions, 51 part-21
time positions, 10 public works seasonal and 12 police reserves (unpaid) employees. Mr. Casey 22
provided a review of the 2015 meetings. The highlighted actions were reviewed. Mr. Casey 23
noted 9 new businesses came to St. Anthony in 2015. The entire report is available on the City’s 24
website www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us and copies are also available at City Hall. 25
26
Councilmember Brever stated this is a wonderful detailed report and thanked Mr. Casey. 27
28
Councilmember Stille stated this is an outstanding report and it encapsulates the main things that 29
the Council and Administration have done. 30
31
Councilmember Gray echoed the same thanks to Mr. Casey and the City Staff. 32
33
Mayor Pro Tem Jenson stated the report was very informative. 34
35
VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. 36
37
City Manager Mark Casey reported two weeks ago the Let’s Play Hockey Foundation brought 25 38
children who hadn’t skated before to Central Park Rink. They came to the Police and Fire 39
Departments to see if they could enlist any help and the Departments provided help to the youth. 40
41
Councilmember Stille stated on February 3 he attended the St. Anthony Community Services 42
Advisory Board at which Councilmember Brever spoke. 43
44
Councilmember Gray stated on January 30 he attended the work session with the North 45
Suburban Communications Commission and North Suburban Access Corporation to review the 46
planning process for this year as well as goal setting. 47
48
4
Councilmember Brever had nothing to report. 1
2
Mayor Pro Tem Jenson had nothing to report. 3
4
VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM. 5
6
Mayor Pro Tem Jenson invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on 7
items that are not on the regular agenda. Hearing none, Mayor Pro Tem Jenson moved forward 8
with the agenda. 9
10
IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS - NONE 11
12
There will be no City Council Meeting on February 23, 2016. 13
14
Councilmember Stille reported the Village Fest is a volunteer organization and they are looking 15
for more volunteers to help plan the event. Interested residents should contact City Hall. 16
17
X. ADJOURNMENT. 18
19
Mayor Pro Tem Jenson adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. 20
21
Respectfully submitted, 22
Debbie Wolfe 23
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 24
25
_ _ 26
ATTEST: ________________________________ Mayor 27
City Clerk 28
29
5
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
6
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: March 8, 2016 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors Licenses:
Classic Construction of Cedar MN, East Bethel, MN
Elijah’s Treecare, Plymouth, MN
Krause-Anderson Construction, Minneapolis, MN
Sign Now, Plymouth, MN
Mechanical Licenses:
Bella Mechanical, Maplewood, MN
Blue Ox Heating & Air, New Hope, MN
Bench Licenses:
Applicant: Affordable Court Resources
Bench Press
U.S. Bench
Cigarette and Tobacco Sales Licenses:
Applicant: Murphy’s Service Center
Location: 3501 29th Ave NE
Applicant: St Anthony Village Wine & Spirits
Location: 2602 39th Ave NE
2700 Hwy 88
Applicant: Walgreen #6735
Location: 3700 Silver Lake Rd NE
Applicant: Freedom Valu Center #64
Location: 3810 Silver Lake Rd NE
Applicant: Cub Foods #1629
Location: 3930 Silver Lake Rd NE
Garbage Hauler/Recycling Licenses:
Applicant: Ace Solid Waste
Aspen Waste Systems
Republic Services
Waste Management of MN
7
Liquor Licenses:
On Sale Liquor License with Sunday Sales:
Applicant: The Unofficial
Location: 3701 Stinson Blvd.
Applicant: Applebee’s
Location: 2800 39th Ave.
Applicant: Village Pub
Location: 2720 Hwy 88
Applicant: Chipotle
Location: 2701 39th Ave.
Wine/Strong Beer License:
Applicant: Smashburger
Location: 3900 Silver Lake Rd.
Applicant: Wine and Canvas
Location: 2900 Pentagon Dr.
3.2 Off Sale License:
Applicant: Freedom Valu
Location: 3810 Silver Lake Rd.
Applicant: Cub Foods
Location: 3930 Silver Lake Rd.
8
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 2/10/2016 - 2/24/2016 Feb 22, 2016 11:44AM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
11991 RL LARSON EXCAVATING INC 28597 02/10/2016 47,528.80
12253 ST PAUL UTILITIES INC 28598 02/10/2016 584,278.50
12288 ADP LLC 28599 02/12/2016 1,177.52
10710 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 28600 02/12/2016 2,396.00
11792 INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL #49 28601 02/12/2016 402.00
11793 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 28602 02/12/2016 1,029.00
10002 LOCAL UNION IAFF #3486 28603 02/12/2016 328.50
11813 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 28604 02/12/2016 80.00
11986 CITIESDIGITAL 28605 02/10/2016 9,369.08
10011 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 28606 02/24/2016 49.06
12293 ACTIVE 911 28607 02/24/2016 352.50
10037 AHO/JESSIE 28608 02/24/2016 37.25
10039 AIRGAS USA LLC 28609 02/24/2016 397.94
10054 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 28610 02/24/2016 1,843.00
10098 ARAMARK 28611 02/24/2016 573.80
1100 ARTISIAN BEER COMPANY 28612 02/24/2016 6,665.09
10115 ASPEN MILLS 28613 02/24/2016 133.49
10116 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC 28614 02/24/2016 130.30
1101 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 28615 02/24/2016 527.00
10159 BEISSWENGER'S 28616 02/24/2016 3.52
1013 BELLBOY CORPORATION 28617 02/24/2016 11,466.19
1014 BELLBOY CORPORATION 28618 02/24/2016 113.12
1035 BERNICK'S BEVERAGE & VENDING 28619 02/24/2016 1,385.80
10175 BLAINE LOCK & SAFE INC.28620 02/24/2016 433.50
1018 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER 28621 02/24/2016 10,540.27
1011 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 28622 02/24/2016 32,307.29
1009 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 28623 02/24/2016 3,252.38
10215 BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 28624 02/24/2016 240.00
1017 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 28625 02/24/2016 16,920.32
1058 CASTLE DANGER BREWERY 28626 02/24/2016 426.40
10252 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 28627 02/24/2016 6,802.74
10254 CENTRAL LOCK & SAFE CO 28628 02/24/2016 329.39
10263 CENTURYLINK 28629 02/24/2016 947.00
10293 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 28630 02/24/2016 9,902.67
10306 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE INC 28631 02/24/2016 85.66
1010 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE COMPANYMPANY 28632 02/24/2016 464.00
1021 COCA COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.28633 02/24/2016 924.29
10326 COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER 28634 02/24/2016 108.75
10327 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 28635 02/24/2016 4,639.46
10332 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLNG. INC 28636 02/24/2016 3,618.00
1042 CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE 28637 02/24/2016 82.60
10373 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 28638 02/24/2016 21.25
10375 DALCO 28639 02/24/2016 63.48
10432 DORSEY & WHITNEY 28640 02/24/2016 20,779.95
1045 EXTREME BEVERAGE 28641 02/24/2016 915.42
1060 FAIR STATE BREWING COOPERATIVE 28642 02/24/2016 318.00
10522 FIRST-SHRED 28643 02/24/2016 33.00
8545 FLAT EARTH BREWING COMPANY 28644 02/24/2016 390.00
12258 FOELL, TRENTON L 28645 02/24/2016 3,000.00
10539 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 28646 02/24/2016 3.58
10550 G & K SERVICES INC 28647 02/24/2016 1,171.93
10573 GOODIN COMPANY 28648 02/24/2016 .93
10578 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 28649 02/24/2016 52.20
9
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 2
Check Issue Dates: 2/10/2016 - 2/24/2016 Feb 22, 2016 11:44AM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
1032 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.28650 02/24/2016 366.75
10603 H & L MESABI INC 28651 02/24/2016 271.62
10642 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT 28652 02/24/2016 2,901.23
10644 HENNEPIN CNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSN 28653 02/24/2016 100.00
10661 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 28654 02/24/2016 1,175.70
12290 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 28655 02/24/2016 18,543.38
10668 HENRICKSEN PSG 28656 02/24/2016 90.00
1019 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 28657 02/24/2016 10,291.70
10684 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 28658 02/24/2016 339.48
1027 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 28659 02/24/2016 1,053.55
10723 INFINITY WIRELESS 28660 02/24/2016 264.00
10733 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC.28661 02/24/2016 85.50
12105 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 28662 02/24/2016 132.95
1016 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 28663 02/24/2016 48,205.59
1102 JOHNSON BROTHERS 28664 02/24/2016 2,229.06
1004 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.28665 02/24/2016 11,233.85
1005 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.28666 02/24/2016 4,983.17
1006 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.28667 02/24/2016 10,773.29
1044 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.28668 02/24/2016 14,950.47
10785 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 28669 02/24/2016 641.55
10797 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 28670 02/24/2016 57.90
10851 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPER 28671 02/24/2016 402.30
10857 LMCIT % BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS 28672 02/24/2016 1,000.00
10833 LMCIT %BERKLY RISK ADMIN CO 28673 02/24/2016 67,953.50
11985 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 28674 02/24/2016 11,274.75
10915 MEMA 28675 02/24/2016 80.00
10916 MENARDS LUMBER 28676 02/24/2016 10.60
10939 MIDWAY FORD 28677 02/24/2016 427.43
10988 MINNESOTA GFOA 28678 02/24/2016 60.00
10994 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 28679 02/24/2016 72.00
11953 MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS 28680 02/24/2016 25.00
11019 MISTER CAR WASH 28681 02/24/2016 119.25
12289 NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL 28682 02/24/2016 300.00
11106 NEOPOST LEASING 28683 02/24/2016 135.00
1051 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 28684 02/24/2016 2,091.50
12088 OFFICE 8 28685 02/24/2016 144.95
11163 OFFICE DEPOT 28686 02/24/2016 288.98
12112 OREILLY AUTO PARTS 28687 02/24/2016 37.23
11185 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.28688 02/24/2016 63.50
11186 PAETEC 28689 02/24/2016 161.79
1012 PAUSTIS & SONS 28690 02/24/2016 2,520.32
1001 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 28691 02/24/2016 4,797.30
1002 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 28692 02/24/2016 10,745.21
11215 PIONEER RIM AND WHEEL CO.28693 02/24/2016 4.54
11225 PLEAA ATTN: J. FORBORD 28694 02/24/2016 35.00
11241 POSTMASTER - MPLS BMEU 28695 02/24/2016 225.00
11258 PRO HYDRO TESTING 28696 02/24/2016 675.00
11302 RAMSEY COUNTY 28697 02/24/2016 263.76
11306 RAMSEY COUNTY LEAGUE OF LOCAL 28698 02/24/2016 200.00
11539 REDPATH AND COMPANY 28699 02/24/2016 10,210.00
12291 RON TURLEY ASSOCIATES INC 28700 02/24/2016 4,020.00
11366 SAM'S CLUB 28701 02/24/2016 75.77
11393 SETS DESIGN, INC.28702 02/24/2016 390.50
10
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 3
Check Issue Dates: 2/10/2016 - 2/24/2016 Feb 22, 2016 11:44AM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
1036 SOUTHERN - WCW 28703 02/24/2016 791.68
1026 SOUTHERN LIQUOR 28704 02/24/2016 18,332.10
1024 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS - LAKES DIVISION 28705 02/24/2016 2,086.76
1008 SOUTHERN WINE-SPIRITS-AMERICAN DIVISION 28706 02/24/2016 940.80
11465 ST. ANTHONY-NEW BRIGHTON 28707 02/24/2016 26,087.78
2001 STEEL TOE BREWING 28708 02/24/2016 285.50
11502 STREICHER'S 28709 02/24/2016 849.00
11529 SWEEPER SERVICES 28710 02/24/2016 261.61
2002 SWEETLAND ORCHARD 28711 02/24/2016 576.00
12292 SWENSON, ERIK 28712 02/24/2016 187.50
11559 THOMPSON ASSOCIATES 28713 02/24/2016 600.00
11566 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 28714 02/24/2016 408.00
11595 TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC.28715 02/24/2016 591.59
11819 TRUE NORTH ELECTRIC 28716 02/24/2016 3,621.60
11609 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR 28717 02/24/2016 1,670.00
11626 U.S. BANK (PURCHASING CARD)28718 02/24/2016 7,329.43
11633 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 28719 02/24/2016 25.99
11635 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIAL 28720 02/24/2016 263.90
11637 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 28721 02/24/2016 27.08
11674 VERIZON WIRELESS 28722 02/24/2016 337.96
1025 VINOCOPIA 28723 02/24/2016 1,993.60
11699 WAL-MART BUSINESS CENTER 28724 02/24/2016 58.50
11704 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 28725 02/24/2016 438.33
11706 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 28726 02/24/2016 264.38
11933 WIMACTEL INC 28727 02/24/2016 45.00
1034 WINE COMPANY/THE 28728 02/24/2016 1,075.60
1038 WINE MERCHANTS INC 28729 02/24/2016 2,033.50
11731 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GRP, INC.28730 02/24/2016 473.32
11735 WORLDPOINT ECC, INC.28731 02/24/2016 419.25
Grand Totals: 1,108,618.60
Automatic Payments:
Xcel Energy $18,113.91
11
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 2/26/2016 - 3/9/2016 Mar 02, 2016 02:07PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
10176 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD 28732 02/26/2016 60,603.50
11798 CENTRAL PENSION FUND LOCAL #49 28733 02/26/2016 2,764.80
10710 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 28734 02/26/2016 2,396.00
12077 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 28735 02/26/2016 855.80
10039 AIRGAS USA LLC 28736 03/09/2016 33.39
10054 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 28737 03/09/2016 2,679.50
10056 ALLIED MEDICAL PRODUCTS 28738 03/09/2016 118.00
1054 AMERICAN BOTTLING CO 28739 03/09/2016 230.80
1100 ARTISIAN BEER COMPANY 28740 03/09/2016 2,475.00
10121 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 28741 03/09/2016 130.00
1101 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 28742 03/09/2016 398.00
10159 BEISSWENGER'S 28743 03/09/2016 6.35
1013 BELLBOY CORPORATION 28744 03/09/2016 2,226.35
1014 BELLBOY CORPORATION 28745 03/09/2016 106.00
11883 BIG RIVER GROUP LLC 28746 03/09/2016 1,000.00
8544 BOURGET IMPORTS 28747 03/09/2016 235.00
1018 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER 28748 03/09/2016 9,439.50
1011 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 28749 03/09/2016 4,133.72
1009 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 28750 03/09/2016 633.63
10197 BRIAN NELSON INSPECTION SVCS 28751 03/09/2016 678.00
1017 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 28752 03/09/2016 7,615.39
11910 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS RECEIVABLES 28753 03/09/2016 204.00
10290 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 28754 03/09/2016 280.00
12150 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 28755 03/09/2016 2,747.75
10293 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 28756 03/09/2016 10,410.97
1010 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE COMPANYMPANY 28757 03/09/2016 1,352.90
12044 COMPASS MINERALS 28758 03/09/2016 7,274.71
10332 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLNG. INC 28759 03/09/2016 3,578.00
10338 CONNELLY ELECTRONICS 28760 03/09/2016 305.70
1042 CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE 28761 03/09/2016 104.30
10461 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.28762 03/09/2016 920.00
12019 ENFORCEMENT LIGHTING LLC 28763 03/09/2016 75.00
10508 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 28764 03/09/2016 162.06
11783 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 28765 03/09/2016 1,774.95
10526 FLEETPRIDE 28766 03/09/2016 136.65
1117 F-TOWN BREWING COMPANY 28767 03/09/2016 139.00
10550 G & K SERVICES INC 28768 03/09/2016 405.50
1032 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.28769 03/09/2016 192.25
10636 HEDBACK, ARENDT & CARLSON PLLC 28770 03/09/2016 3,500.00
10647 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY 28771 03/09/2016 81.20
1019 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 28772 03/09/2016 3,099.00
10684 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 28773 03/09/2016 178.84
1027 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 28774 03/09/2016 1,434.30
10726 INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION 28775 03/09/2016 2,925.42
11754 INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC.28776 03/09/2016 586.00
10753 INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT - HR 28777 03/09/2016 100.00
1016 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 28778 03/09/2016 9,909.30
1004 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.28779 03/09/2016 1,477.73
1005 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.28780 03/09/2016 2,148.17
1006 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.28781 03/09/2016 3,316.21
1044 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.28782 03/09/2016 1,254.18
10797 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 28783 03/09/2016 155.76
1022 M. AMUNDSON LLP 28784 03/09/2016 1,974.85
12
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 2
Check Issue Dates: 2/26/2016 - 3/9/2016 Mar 02, 2016 02:07PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
10931 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL - WASTEWATER 28785 03/09/2016 48,019.79
10978 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTYS ASSN 28786 03/09/2016 11.00
12294 NADAV, AMIR 28787 03/09/2016 1,520.82
11089 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28788 03/09/2016 175.98
1051 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 28789 03/09/2016 485.47
12112 OREILLY AUTO PARTS 28790 03/09/2016 24.73
11185 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.28791 03/09/2016 710.00
11186 PAETEC 28792 03/09/2016 89.63
1012 PAUSTIS & SONS 28793 03/09/2016 1,570.00
11211 PETTY CASH - U.S. BANK 28794 03/09/2016 173.47
1001 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 28795 03/09/2016 781.21
1002 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 28796 03/09/2016 2,466.03
11241 POSTMASTER - MPLS BMEU 28797 03/09/2016 1,950.00
11302 RAMSEY COUNTY 28798 03/09/2016 1,844.85
11345 ROSEVILLE CHRYSLER DODGE 28799 03/09/2016 144.32
11376 SCHELEN-GRAY AUTO ELECTRIC 28800 03/09/2016 325.00
11427 SOURCEONE GRAPHICS, INC.28801 03/09/2016 35.26
1036 SOUTHERN - WCW 28802 03/09/2016 505.12
1026 SOUTHERN LIQUOR 28803 03/09/2016 3,418.34
1024 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS - LAKES DIVISION 28804 03/09/2016 1,235.02
1008 SOUTHERN WINE-SPIRITS-AMERICAN DIVISION 28805 03/09/2016 494.40
11457 ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CENTER, LLC 28806 03/09/2016 2,220.04
11482 STATE OF MINNESOTA 28807 03/09/2016 40.60
11485 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 28808 03/09/2016 225.00
11502 STREICHER'S 28809 03/09/2016 2,064.97
12026 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 28810 03/09/2016 425.00
11531 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 28811 03/09/2016 77.94
11536 TASC 28812 03/09/2016 615.00
11819 TRUE NORTH ELECTRIC 28813 03/09/2016 1,700.00
11633 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 28814 03/09/2016 1,046.76
11674 VERIZON WIRELESS 28815 03/09/2016 1,299.74
11681 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 28816 03/09/2016 24.83
1025 VINOCOPIA 28817 03/09/2016 869.00
11704 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 28818 03/09/2016 438.76
1034 WINE COMPANY/THE 28819 03/09/2016 1,120.55
1038 WINE MERCHANTS INC 28820 03/09/2016 1,392.61
11731 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GRP, INC.28821 03/09/2016 153.07
12295 YELLOW DOG UPHOLSTERY 28822 03/09/2016 175.00
11753 ZIEGLER, INC.28823 03/09/2016 563.12
Grand Totals: 241,395.86
13
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
14
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: March 8, 2016
Resolution-Authorizing Amended East Metro SWAT Joint Powers Agreement
Overview:
In front of you this evening is an amended Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for the East Metro SWAT.
At the August 25, 2015 City Council meeting the Joint Powers Agreement was approved. Before
you this evening is an amended JPA. The minor amendments were to update statute references in
the insurance and indemnifications sections. Included in the packet this evening is the clean
amended JPA.
15
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
16
East Metro Special Weapons and Tactics Team
Joint Powers Agreement
17
I. MISSION
The primary mission of the East Metro Swat Team (EMS) is to jointly provide specialized police
services for its members in critical incident emergency situations more effectively and efficiently
than those services could be provided by each member on its own. The EMS team assists member
law enforcement agencies and non-member law enforcement agencies, should they request mutual
aid, in the resolution of high risk or critical incidents. The EMS team is specially trained and
equipped to work as a coordinated team to respond to and resolve critical incidents.
Examples of situations where EMS can be of assistance include, but are not limited to, the
following:
A. Incidents of Hostage Taking.
B. Incidents of a Barricaded Suspect(s).
C. Building or Field Searches for Armed or Dangerous Suspects.
D. High Risk Warrant Service.
E. Incidents of Civil Disturbance and Crowd Control.
F. Providing and Assisting with Dignitary Protection.
G. Any Other High Risk Incident or Situation Deemed Appropriate by EMS Operating Board.
II. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
The parties to this Agreement are units of government responsible for critical incident response in
their respective jurisdictions. This Agreement is made pursuant to the authority conferred upon the
parties by Minn. Stat. § 471.59 and §473.407; see also Minnesota Chapter 629.
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned governmental units, in the joint and mutual exercise of their
powers, agree as follows:
1. Name.
The parties hereby establish the East Metro Swat Team (EMS).
2. General Purpose.
The purpose of this Joint Powers Agreement is to establish an organization to coordinate
efforts to develop and provide joint response to critical incidents or high risk entries where
there is a risk of criminal violence, occurring within the parties’ jurisdictions.
3. Parties.
The parties to this Agreement shall consist of the following units of government that have
signed this agreement:
The City of Roseville
The City of St. Anthony
The City of North St. Paul
The University of Minnesota
The Metropolitan Council
18
III. GOVERNANCE
3.01 Governing Board
The governing board of EMS shall consist of the following:
East Metro Swat shall be governed by a governing board. Members of this board will be known as
“Directors.” The Chief Law Enforcement Officer from each member, or his or her designee, shall
serve as Director.
Members of the governing board shall not be deemed to be employees of the governing board and
shall not be compensated by the governing board.
3.02 Terms
Appointees shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing party and may be removed only by the
appointing party.
3.03 Chair
The board will elect a chair. The Chair shall have no more power than any other Director except
that the Chair shall: give notice of meetings when scheduled or otherwise called; call meetings to
order and provide for their orderly and efficient conduct; provide for the preparation of minutes;
and when authorized by the passage of a motion by board, execute contracts, agreements, reports,
filing and other documents on behalf of EMS.
3.04 Meetings
The governing board shall have a minimum of one meeting per year. Special meetings may be
called by the Chair or two Directors. All meetings and notice of meeting shall comply with the
Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, as amended. The presence of a
simple majority of the Directors shall constitute a quorum.
3.05 Voting
Each party to this agreement shall have one vote at any meeting of the governing board. Proxy
votes are not permitted. The governing board shall function by a majority vote of board members
or alternate members present, provided that a quorum is present.
3.06 Duties of the Governing Board
The governing board will formulate a program to carry out its purpose.
The governing board will coordinate information between the parties and EMS.
The governing board shall appoint and supervise the Team Commander of East Metro Swat.
Appointments require the concurrence of the chief law enforcement officer of the Team
Commander’s employer.
3.07 Powers of the Governing Board
The governing board may enter into any contract necessary or proper for the exercise of its powers
or the fulfillment to its duties and enforce such contracts to the extent available in equity or at law,
except that the governing board shall not enter into any contract the term of which exceeds the term
of this agreement. No payment on any invoice shall be authorized unless approved by a majority of
its members. The chair shall report to the governing board any such payments at its next meeting.
The governing board may apply for and accept gifts, grants or other property (excluding real
property) or assistance from the United States government, the State of Minnesota, or any person,
association, or agency for any of its purposes; enter into any agreement in connection therewith;
19
and hold, use and dispose of such money or other property and assistance in accordance with the
terms of the gift, grant or loan relating thereto.
All powers granted herein shall be exercised by the governing board in a fiscally responsible
manner and in accordance with the requirements of law.
The governing board may cooperate with other federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to
accomplish the purpose for which it is organized.
3.08 Insurance
The governing board must obtain and maintain liability insurance in amounts not less than the
statutory liability limits established under Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 and Minn. Stat.3.736 and may obtain
other insurance it deems necessary to insure the parties, the governing board, its members and
employees of the parties for actions arising out of this Agreement.
Any excess or uninsured liability shall be borne equally by all the members, but this does not
include the liability of any individual officer, employee, or volunteer which arises from his or her
own malfeasance, willful neglect of duty, or bad faith.
IV. BUDGET AND FINANCE
4.01 Budget
By March 31 of each year the governing board shall prepare and adopt a budget for the following
calendar year and may amend the same from time to time.
4.02 Expenses
The parties intend to fund EMS through an equal, annual contribution paid by each party. The
governing board shall establish the contribution by March 31 of the year prior to the year when the
contribution is payable. The parties agree to pay the contribution as determined by the governing
board on or before January 31 of the year following the determination. These funds may be paid
from grants funds, drug forfeitures, and any funds voluntarily contributed by any member.
4.03 Accountability
The Roseville Police Department shall act as the fiscal agent for EMS. All funds shall be
accounted for according to generally accepted accounting principles. A report on all receipts and
disbursements shall be forwarded to the parties quarterly and on an annual basis.
V. POSITIONS
5.01 Team Commander
The Team Commander shall be a licensed peace officer appointed by the governing board.
Appointment as Team Commander pursuant to this agreement shall not obligate any party to pay to
its employees so appointed either supervisory or other premium pay.
5.02 Leadership Positions
The Team Commander shall appoint licensed peace officers to serve as executive officers, and
team leaders subject to approval of the governing board. Appointment to a leadership position
pursuant to this agreement shall not obligate any party to pay to its employees so appointed either
supervisory or other premium pay.
Peace officers assigned to leadership positions within EMS at all times will remain employees of
the members’ own jurisdictions and will not be employees of the governing board.
20
Peace officers assigned to leadership positions shall be the liaison between the team members and
the Team Commander when an EMS team has been deployed pursuant to this agreement.
5.03 Team members
The chief law enforcement officer of each party shall assign licensed peace officers to serve as
EMS team members, subject to approval of the Team Commander. Appointment as a team member
pursuant to this agreement shall not obligate any party to pay its employees so appointed any
premium pay.
Team members assigned to the EMS at all times will remain employees of the members’ own
jurisdictions and will not be employees of the governing board.
A party may decline to make its personnel available to respond to a call for assistance. Failure to
provide assistance in response to a request made pursuant to this agreement will not result in any
liability to the party that fails to provide assistance or to the EMS.
5.04 Direction and Control
Personnel and equipment provided pursuant to this agreement shall be under the direction and the
tactical control of the licensed peace officer in command of the scene of the jurisdiction to which
assistance is being provided. They shall remain under this tactical control until the request for
assistance ends, or they are recalled by the Team Commander.
5.05 Compensation
When EMS provides services to a requesting party, the personnel of EMS shall be compensated by
their respective employers just as if they were performing the duties within and for the jurisdiction
of their employer. No charges will be levied by EMS or by parties for specialized response
operations provided to a requesting party pursuant to this agreement unless that assistance
continues for a period exceeding 48 continuous hours. If assistance provided pursuant to this
agreement continues for more than 48 continuous hours, and the assistance is not provided in
connection with a criminal investigation, any party whose officers provided assistance for EMS
shall submit itemized bills for the actual cost of any assistance provided, including salaries,
overtime, materials and supplies, to EMS and EMS shall submit the invoices to the requesting
party. The requesting party shall reimburse EMS for that amount, and EMS shall forward the
reimbursement to its respective members.
Each of the parties, with the exception of the Metropolitan Council, is required by Minn. Stat., §
12.27, Subd. 3 to designate employees or officers who are authorized to dispatch equipment and
personnel, in certain emergencies, to other jurisdictions. For purposes of dispatching EMS teams,
each of the parties delegates such authority to EMS, which is authorized to dispatch such personnel
and equipment, taking into consideration each party's available resources.
Calls for assistance from non-parties to EMS shall be governed by Minn. Stat., § 12.331. Each of
the parties, with the exception of the Metropolitan Council, delegates to EMS the authority to
respond with the personnel and equipment of that party that are assigned to EMS as a sending
political subdivision within the meaning of Minn. Stat., § 12.331, Subd. 1, which is authorized to
dispatch such personnel and equipment, taking into consideration each party's available resources.
If EMS provides services to an entity not a party to this agreement, the responding parties may
submit itemized bills for the actual cost of any assistance provided, including salaries, overtime,
materials and supplies, to EMS, and EMS may bill such entity for the actual costs in accordance
with Minn. Stat., § 12.331.
21
5.06 Workers’ Compensation
Each party to this agreement shall be responsible for injuries to or death of its own employees in
conjunction with services provided pursuant to this agreement. Each party shall maintain workers’
compensation coverage or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are
providing assistance as a member of EMS. Each party to this agreement waives the right to sue
any other party for any workers’ compensation benefits paid to its own employee or their
dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other
party or its officers, employees or agents.
5.07 Damage to Equipment
Each party shall be responsible for damage to or loss of its own equipment occurring during
deployment of EMS. Each party waives the right to sue any other party for any damages to or loss
of its equipment, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly or partially by the negligence
of any other party or its officers, employees or agents. Any equipment purchased or acquired by
EMS shall be maintained and accounted for by the EMS Board and fiscal agent designated under
section 4.03. Surplus property may be disposed of only under procedures authorized by law and
distribution of property upon termination of this agreement shall be as provided for by Minn. Stat.
§471.59, Subd. 5.
5.08 Indemnification
East Metro Swat shall defend and indemnify the parties, and their officers, employees, and
volunteers, from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees,
arising out the acts or omissions of any person acting on behalf of the governing board in carrying
out the terms of this agreement. This agreement does not constitute a waiver on the limitations of
liability set forth in Minn. Stat. §466.04 or Minn. Stat. §3.736.
Nothing herein shall be construed to provide insurance coverage or indemnification to an officer,
employee, or volunteer of any member for any act or omission for which the officer, employee, or
volunteer is guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect of duty, or bad faith.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, action by the parties to this agreement are intended to be and
shall be construed as a “cooperative activity” and it is the intent of the parties that they shall be
deemed a “single governmental unit” for the purposes of liability, as set forth in Minn. Stat., §
471.59, subd. 1a (a), provide further that for purposes of that statute, each party to this agreement
expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of another party. The parties to this
agreement are not liable for the acts or omissions of another party to this agreement except to the
extent they have agreed in writing to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other parties.
When a party to this agreement loans an automobile to East Metro Swat, East Metro Swat’s
automobile liability coverage shall be primary when East Metro Swat is in possession of the
automobile. East Metro Swat agrees to defend and indemnify the owner of the automobile and any
other parties to this agreement for any liability claims related to the use of the automobile, subject
to the limitations in Section 3.08 of this Agreement.
5.09 Term
This agreement will be in force for a period of three years from the date of execution.
22
VI. WITHDRAWL AND TERMINATION
6.01 Withdrawal
Any party may withdraw from this agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other
parties. Withdrawal by any party shall not terminate this agreement with respect to any parties who
have not withdrawn. Withdrawal shall not discharge any liability incurred by any party prior to
withdrawal. Such liability shall continue until discharged by law or agreement.
6.02 Additional Members and Change in Membership
A governmental unit may join EMS and become a member upon approval by the Governing Board
and execution of a copy of this Agreement by its governing body.
The Governing Board may involuntarily terminate a member if that member has failed to provide a
minimum of one officer to East Metro Swat for more than 12 consecutive months.
6.03 Termination
This agreement shall terminate upon the occurrence of any one of the following events: (a) when
necessitated by operation of law or as a result of a decision by a court of competent jurisdiction; or
(b) when a majority of remaining parties agrees to terminate the agreement upon a date certain.
6.04 Effect of Termination
Termination shall not discharge any liability incurred by EMS or by the parties during the term of
this agreement. Upon termination and after payment of all outstanding obligations, property or
surplus money held by EMS shall then be distributed to the parties in proportion to their
contributions.
6.05 Amendments
This agreement may be amended only in writing and upon the consent of each of the parties’
governing body.
6.06 Counterparts
This agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Counterparts shall be filed
with the Roseville Police Department.
23
Execution
Each Party, hereto has read, agreed to and executed this Joint Powers Agreement on the date
indicated.
The City of St. Anthony Village
Mayor Jerome O. Faust
Signature: _______________________________ Date: _________________
City Manager Mark Casey
Signature: _______________________________ Date: _________________
24
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 16-024
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
FOR THE EAST METRO SWAT TEAM
WHEREAS, The East Metro SWAT Team provides specialized police services for its members in critical
emergency situations; and
WHEREAS, The City of St. Anthony has been a part of the East Metro SWAT since 2002; and
WHEREAS, Currently, The East Metro SWAT is comprised of the police departments from Roseville,
St. Anthony, North St. Paul, The University of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Metro Transit wishes to join the East Metro SWAT as a member; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes the City of St. Anthony to
remain a member of the East Metro SWAT and execute Joint Powers Agreement.
Adopted this 8th day of March, 2016.
__________________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:___________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Review for Administration: _________________________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
25
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
26
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: March 8, 2016
Consent Agenda-Accepting Fire Relief’s Recommendation of No Change in Pension Benefit
OVERVIEW:
Each year the Fire Relief Association (FRA) reviews its financial position to determine if the existing
benefit level should be adjusted according to their policy. For 2016 no change to the benefit level was
determine by this process.
The FRA uses the state formula to determine its pension liability. Using the State formula the pension
fund was 102.3% at 12/31/2015. With the adoption of GASB 67 the FRA was required to get an
outside actuarial report for it pension plan. The pension liability determined by the actuarial report is
now the amount used in the annual Financial Statements. The pension funding level reported in the
2015 audited Financial Statements is 120.4%.
Therefore the FRA’s use of the State’s computation of pension liability is the conservative practice. I
recommend that the Mayor and City Council approve $3,300 as the 2016 benefit level reflecting no
increase from 2015, per the FRA letter attached.
27
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
28
29
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
30
Building a legacy – your legacy. 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com S:\1Council Meetings\2016\03082016\LTR-hmcc-030816.docx
March 8, 2016
The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff
c/o Mark Casey, City Manager
City of St. Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road NE
St. Anthony Village, MN 55418-1603
Re: 2016 Street and Utility Improvement Project
St. Anthony Village, MN
WSB Project No. 2170-130
Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff:
Following this letter are three resolutions for your consideration at the March 8, 2016 Council Meeting.
The three resolutions for your consideration are:
I. A Resolution Ordering Improvements
This resolution states that the Council has completed the public hearing process and orders the
project to be completed.
II. A Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for the 2016 Street and Utility
Improvements
Included in the Council packet are the assessments that have been calculated in accordance with
the City’s street assessment policy for the 2016 Street and Utility Improvement Project. This
resolution declares the amount to be assessed at $303,463.99 and outlines the assessment
process in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429.
III. A Resolution Awarding a Bid for 2016 Street and Utility Improvements
This resolution awards the contract for the 2016 street reconstruction project to the lowest
bidder. A tabulation of these bidders, as well as the low bidder of R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. with
a bid amount of $2,060,276.95, can be seen in the Council packet.
If you have any questions, I will be present at the March 8, 2016 Council Meeting to discuss those with
you or please call me at 763-287-7182.
Sincerely,
Todd E. Hubmer, PE
City Engineer
Attachments
31
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
32
2016 Street and Utility
Improvement Project
Public Hearing
March 8, 2016
7:00 P.M.
Project
Location
Stinson Boulevard NE
(from 37th Avenue NE to
Silver Lane NE)
33
Sanitary Sewer
Improvements
Water System
Improvements
34
Drainage
Improvements
Street
Reconstruction
35
Driveway Replacement
Trees and Restoration
Access to Businesses will be Maintained but Minor
Disruptions for Short Periods of Time to be Expected
Special Needs/Events
Sprinkler Systems/Invisible Fencing
Mail & Garbage Service
Private Utilities
CenterPoint Energy gas line replacement
Common Concerns
36
Project Schedule
Council Authorize Feasibility June 2015
Council Accept Feasibility September 2015
1st Public Info Meeting October 2015
Council Approve Plans December 2015
Receive Bids/Compute Assessments January 2016
2nd Public Info Meeting February 2016
Public Hearing/Award Contract March 2016
(7th of 7 meetings)
Begin Construction May 2016
Substantial Completion October 2016
Final Paving June 2017
Project Cost/Funding Breakdown
37
Funding Sources
Special Assessment
429 Public Improvement Bond
Municipal State Aid (MSA) – Fund balance
owed to City for future will increase.
Assessment Calculations
City Policy for Street & Local Drainage Improvements
Up to 32-foot Wide, 9-ton Design Roadway
35% Assessed to Residential (R-3)
50% Assessed to Commercial and High Density
Residential (R-4)
Calculated using Lineal Feet of Street Frontage
City Funds Pay Remaining Cost
38
Method for Determining Front Footage
Assessed Parcels
Stinson Boulevard NE
to be reconstructed
to 37-foot wide, 10-
ton design roadway
The City assumes the over-
sizing costs to
accommodate heavy truck
traffic and larger traffic
volumes along Stinson
Boulevard NE. Benefitting
property owners are
proposed to be assessed
only those costs
associated with
reconstructing Stinson
Boulevard to a 32-foot
wide, 9-ton design
roadway.
39
Financing Assessments
One Time Assessment Notice Sent in May 2016
Assessments Paid Over 15-Yr Period
Option Deadline
1.Pay-off full Assessment Nov. 29, 2016
to avoid interest Nov. 29, (every year after)
2.Partial Payment Nov. 29, 2016 (1st year)
3.Apply direct to Property Automatic if above
Tax options are not exercised
- If Applied to Taxes....15 Year Payback..2% over the True Interest Cost
(Not known until bonds are sold)
- Assessment deferral? Contact the City Finance Director
40
41
Questions?
42
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 16-025
A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE 2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted on the 8th day of March 2016, fixed a date for
Council hearing on the proposed improvements:
Street & Utility Reconstruction
Stinson Boulevard from 37th Avenue NE to Silver Lane NE
Trail and Sidewalk Improvements
8’ bituminous trail along west side of Stinson Boulevard between 37th Place N and 40th
Avenue NE (This is a Columbia Heights improvement)
Salo Park sidewalk replacement
Decorative Lighting
Stinson Boulevard NE between 37th Avenue NE and Silver Lane NE
WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice in advance of said hearing was
given and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of March 2016, at which time all
persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village
approve such improvements as are hereby ordered in the Council Resolution.
Adopted this 8th day of March, 2016.
_____________________________
Jerome O Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:____________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: ______________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
43
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
44
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
NOTICE OF HEARING ON 2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village will meet in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony Village, MN, at 7:00 pm, or as soon
thereafter as possible, on March 8, 2016, to consider making the following improvements:
2016 Street, Sanitary Sewer, Water Main, and
Drainage Improvements and Appurtenant Work
This project consists of road and alleyway surface improvements, replacement or new construction of
sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer lines, drainage improvements, and pedestrian crossing
improvements. The improvements are identified below:
1. Street and utility improvements considered for assessment include:
Street & Utility Reconstruction
Stinson Boulevard from 37th Avenue NE to Silver Lane NE
Trail and Sidewalk Improvements
Salo Park sidewalk replacement
2. Public improvements not proposed for assessment include:
Trail and Sidewalk Improvements
8’ bituminous trail along west side of Stinson Boulevard between 37th Place N and 40th
Avenue NE (This is a Columbia Heights improvement)
Decorative Lighting
Stinson Boulevard NE between 37th Avenue NE and Silver Lane NE
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.011 to 429.111, portions of the improvement will be assessed to the
abutting property owners of the named streets. The estimated cost of the improvement is $2,700,000.
Such persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this
meeting.
Mark Casey
City Manager
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
1. February 17, 2016
2. March 2, 2016
45
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
46
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 16-026
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE 2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for various public
improvements is 35% (low density residential) and 50% (high density residential and commercial)
assessable as follows:
Years First Year Levy
First
Year Collectible Assessed
15 2016 2017 $303,463.99
For improvements to the following:
Street & Utility Reconstruction
Stinson Boulevard from 37th Avenue NE to Silver Lane NE
against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon
the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as required by law that this
Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, and said proposed
assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public inspection and an opportunity has been
given to all interested persons to present their objections if any, to such proposed assessments.
2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that each of the lots,
pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefited by
the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the
description of each such lot, piec e and parcel of land respectively, and such amount so set out is
hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described.
3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessments f or
each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel,
together with interest at the rate calculated at 2% over the interest cost per annum on the bonds to be
issued by the City for said improvement, accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien
concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment
not pre -paid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years,
as indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire
assessment for the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 will be payable with
general taxes for the levy year of 2016 collectible in 2017, and one of each of the remaining
installments, together with one year’s interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be
payable with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid.
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification, make payments
(partial or full) towards the balance owed. The owner may, at any time after certification, pay the
whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no inte rest be
charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 30th of the assessment year.
5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified
duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set
forth separately, to be extended upon the property tax lists of the County and the County Auditor
shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law.
47
Adopted this 8th day of March, 2016.
_____________________________
Jerome O Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:____________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: ______________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
48
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS FOR
2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
TIME AND PLACE, GENERAL NATURE Notice is hereby given that the City Council
OF IMPROVEMENTS: of the City of St. Anthony Village, Minnesota,
will meet in the Council Chambers of the City of
St. Anthony Village on the 8th day of March,
2016, at 7:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as
possible, to consider objections to the proposed
assessments for 2016 Street and Utility
Improvement Project, heretofore ordered by the
City Council.
ASSESSMENT ROLL OPEN TO INSPECTION: The proposed assessment roll is on file with the
City Clerk and open to public inspection.
AREA PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: The area proposed to be assessed consists of
every lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by
said improvement, which has been ordered as
follows:
Street & Utility Reconstruction
Stinson Boulevard from 37th Avenue NE to
Silver Lane NE
Sidewalk Improvements
Salo Park sidewalk replacement
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED: The total amount proposed to be assessed is
ASSESSMENT: $303,463.99.
PROPOSED AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED TO Attached is the proposed assessment amount
EACH PARCEL: for each parcel included in the 2016 Street and
Utility Improvement Project.
WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS: Written or oral objections will be considered at
the hearing.
RIGHT OF APPEAL: An owner of property to be assessed may appeal
the assessment to the district court of Hennepin
County pursuant to the Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30
days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the district court within
ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
49
LIMITATION OF APPEAL: No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
assessment adopted by the City Council unless a
written objection signed by the affected property
owner is filed with the Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the presiding
officer at the hearing. All objections to the
assessments not received at the assessment
hearing in the manner prescribed by Minnesota
Statutes, Section 429.061 are waived, unless the
failure to object at the assessment hearing is due
to a reasonable cause.
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS: Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the City may, at its
discretion, defer the payment of assessments for
any homestead property owned by a person 65
years of age or older for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments.
MAILED NOTICE: The notice of this hearing mailed to property
owners contains additional information.
Mark Casey
City Manager
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
1. February 17, 2016
50
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Mark Casey, City Manager
From: Breanne Rothstein, AICP, City Planner
Date: March 8, 2016 City Council Meeting
WSB Project No. 02170-250
Request: Consider Resolution to Amend Sections 152.008 and 152.188 of City Code
Pertaining to Medical Cannabis facilities
OVERVIEW
Following the legalization of medical cannabis by the State of Minnesota, the City of St. Anthony Village
enacted a moratorium (“interim ordinance”) on February 24, 2015 prohibiting medical cannabis
manufacturers and cannabis facilities within the city. The interim ordinance directed the city to conduct
a detailed study investigating the necessity of a Zoning Code update and any prerequisites or
considerations prior to an amendment of the City Code regulating medical cannabis manufacturers and
facilities.
The City’s completed study includes a review of the Minnesota state statute that prompted this
investigation as well as an overview of Federal cannabis law. Following an analysis of medical cannabis
within the context of existing City Zoning Code and the finding that significant land uses within St.
Anthony would be sensitive to medical cannabis manufacturing or dispensary as well as the potential for
emergent public safety concerns, the study recommends prohibiting all cannabis facilities in the City.
The full text of the study is included with this report.
A draft resolution would implement the recommendation of this study, amending the City’s Zoning Code
to reflect the findings and prohibit medical cannabis manufacture and facilities in St. Anthony Village.
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS
As proposed, the resolution would specifically do the following:
• Include a specific designation for Cannabis Facility (Marijuana Dispensary) as “an
establishment or business which cultivates, acquires, manufactures, possesses, prepares,
transfers, transports, supplies, or dispenses medical cannabis or any related supplies in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes.”( § 152.008)
• Prohibit Cannabis Facilities in all zoning districts (§ 152.188)
• Include the provision clarifying that the revised Code does not preclude doctors from writing
legal cannabis prescriptions or patients from exercising their legal right to possess or
administer medical marijuana as per the law.
51
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of the enclosed resolution amending Sections 152.008 and 152.188 of City
Code to prohibit medical cannabis facilities in all City districts.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 22, 2016 (no one spoke), and
forwarded the resolution to City Council with no recommendation.
52
Cannabis Facilities Zoning
Amendment
City Council Meeting
March 8,2016
Overview
o St. Anthony adopted a moratorium related to cannabis facilities
(marijuana dispensaries) to study the issue.
o St. Anthony commissioned a study of MN State Statute regarding
medical cannabis and its potential impact on zoning code in St.
Anthony.
o The study concluded and recommended that cannabis facilities be
prohibited in all zoning districts, due to potential for public safety
concerns and incompatibility with surrounding land uses.
53
Summary of Amendments
•Include a specific designation for Cannabis Facility (Marijuana
Dispensary) as “an establishment or business which cultivates,
acquires, manufactures, possesses, prepares, transfers, transports,
supplies, or dispenses medical cannabis or any related supplies in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes.”( § 152.008)
•Prohibit Cannabis Facilities in all zoning districts (§ 152.188)
•Include the provision clarifying that the revised Code does not
preclude doctors from writing legal cannabis prescriptions or
patients from exercising their legal right to possess or administer
medical marijuana as per the law.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve
the enclosed zoning amendments related to
cannabis facilities (marijuana dispensaries).
The PC met on February 22nd, held a public
hearing (no one spoke) and forwarded the
resolution to Council with no recommendation.
54
Questions?
55
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
56
A STUDY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY
ZONING CODE REGARDING THE REGULATION OF MEDICAL CANNABIS
MANUFACTURERS AND CANNABIS FACILITIES
Conducted By
THE CITY STAFF OF THE CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE, MINNESOTA
January 2015
57
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................3
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ....................................................................................3
2.1 Recent Change in the Legal Status of Medical Cannabis Under Minnesota
Law ..........................................................................................................................4
2.2 Federal Law .............................................................................................................7
2.3 Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) and Resolution Adopting Study..........................7
3.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY........................................................................................................8
4.0 ANALYSIS OF CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE ZONING CODE ...................9
4.1 Status of Cannabis in the City Code ........................................................................9
4.2 City of Saint Anthony Village Zoning Code: Intent, Purpose, and
Interpretation ............................................................................................................9
4.3 Zoning Districts .....................................................................................................10
4.4 Interpretation of Medical Cannabis under the City’s Zoning Districts ..................12
5.0 IMPACT OF MEDICAL CANNABIS ..............................................................................14
5.1 Land Uses Sensitive to Medical Cannabis .............................................................14
5.2 Land Use Controls to Protect Sensitive Uses ........................................................14
5.3 Sensitive Land Uses in St. Anthony ......................................................................14
5.4 Public Safety ..........................................................................................................15
6.0 OPTIONS FOR MEDICAL CANNABIS .........................................................................17
6.1 No Action ...............................................................................................................17
6.2 Restricting Cannabis Facilities to LI District Subject to a Buffer .........................17
6.3 Prohibiting All Cannabis Facilities in the City ......................................................18
7.0 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................18
58
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Following the legalization of medical cannabis by the State of Minnesota, the City of
Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota (the “City”) enacted Ordinance 2015-02; Interim Ordinance
Prohibiting Medical Cannabis Manufacturers and Cannabis Facilities on February 24, 2015 (the
“Interim Ordinance”) that imposed an interim moratorium on medical cannabis manufacturers
and cannabis facilities within the City and directed City staff to prepare an in-depth study
evaluating the need to revise the City Code to regulate Medical Cannabis Manufacturers and
Cannabis Facilities.
The goals of the Study are as follows:
• Determine the status of medical cannabis under the City Code;
• Determine the status of medical cannabis manufacturers and facilities under the
City’s Zoning Code;
• Determine whether the Zoning Code’s application to medical cannabis
manufacturers and facilities is consistent with the City’s intent in planning for
property use within its zoning districts;
• Evaluate the challenges involved with regulating medical cannabis manufacturers
and facilities;
• Ensure that, if amended, the Zoning Code is improved in regards to consistency
and clarity with respect to medical cannabis manufacturers; and
• Ensure that the Zoning Code is consistent with state law pertaining to medical
cannabis.
To increase clarity and consistency within the Zoning Code following the legalization of
medical cannabis, the City Council should consider amending the Zoning Code. The City should
do so in a manner that conforms to the original intent of the City’s zoning plan. This Study
describes three potential options for the City in amending its Zoning Code:
• Option 1. Take no action.
• Option 2. Adopt amendments to the Zoning Code to make cannabis facilities a
permitted conditional use limited to the LI District.
• Option 3. Adopt an amendment to the Zoning Code prohibiting cannabis facilities
in the City.
Overall, Option #3 represents the best course of action for the City. The complete Study,
including the basis for this final recommendation, follows in the sections below.
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Prior to analyzing whether the Zoning Code should be amended, it is first important to
understand the context within which this Study operates. This Study therefore provides
background information regarding the legalization of medical cannabis in the State of Minnesota.
59
2.1 Recent Change in the Legal Status of Medical Cannabis Under Minnesota
Law
According to the Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department report
Minnesota’s Medical Cannabis Therapeutic Research Act (the “MCTRA”), dated July 2015:1
In May 2014, the Medical Cannabis Therapeutic Research Act was passed by the
Minnesota Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Mark Dayton. The law
establishes a patient registry program, administered by the Minnesota Department
of Health (MDH), which allows qualifying patients to use and possess cannabis
for medical use. The law allows for two manufacturers to be registered in the
state. Each manufacturer will have one manufacturing facility and four
distribution sites throughout the state. The manufacturers may only distribute
medical cannabis in pill or liquid form, and patients may only possess medical
cannabis in those limited forms.
Qualifying medical conditions include:
1. Cancer
2. Glaucoma
3. HIV/AIDS
4. Tourette’s
5. ALS
6. Seizures
7. Severe and persistent muscle spasms
8. Crohn’s disease
9. Terminal illness with life expectancy of under one year
10. Any other condition or its treatment approved by the commissioner
(subject to legislative overview)
. . .
Manufacturers
Registration
On December 1, 2014, MDH registered two medical cannabis manufacturers that
are subject to re-registration every two years. As a condition of initial
registration, each manufacturer agreed to begin distribution of medical cannabis
to patients by July 1, 2015, and comply with other requirements under the law.
MDH was required to consider the following factors when determining which
manufacturers to register:
• Technical expertise in cultivation and conversion into allowable forms of
medical cannabis
1 Available at http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/pubs/MCTRA.pdf
60
• The qualifications of the manufacturer’s employees
• The long-term financial stability of the manufacturer
• The ability to provide appropriate security measures on the premises of the
manufacturer
• Whether the manufacturer has demonstrated an ability to meet the medical
cannabis production needs required by the registry program
• The manufacturer’s projection and ongoing assessment of fees on patients
Regulation
. . .
Location of facilities
Each manufacturer will have four distribution facilities and one production
facility (the production facility may be at the same location as a distribution
facility). The distribution facilities must be located throughout the state based on
geographical need in order to improve patient access. No facility may be within
1,000 feet of a school, public or private, that was in existence prior to the
manufacturer’s registration with MDH.
Security
Manufacturers must have certain security measures on all distribution sites as well
as the production site. These security measures include:
• a fully operational security alarm system;
• facility access control;
• perimeter intrusion detection systems; and
• a personnel identification system.
. . .
Distribution
What may be distributed
A manufacturer may only distribute medical cannabis as a pill or liquid. The
manufacturers are allowed, but not required, to distribute medical cannabis
products, such as delivery devices and educational material. All medical cannabis
must be assigned a tracking number and be in packaging that complies with the
United States Poison Prevention Packing Act. All medical cannabis must also be
labeled with the following information:
• All active ingredients
• Individually identifying information, including:
° the patient’s name and date of birth
61
° if applicable, the name and date of birth of the patient’s registered
designated caregiver or parent or legal guardian
° the patient’s registry identification number
° the chemical composition
° the dosage
Who may distribute the medical cannabis?
Only employees of the manufacturer who are licensed pharmacists in Minnesota
may distribute medical cannabis. Distribution by the pharmacist may only occur
after the pharmacist has consulted with the patient to determine the proper dosage
and range of chemical compositions for that individual patient.
The MCTRA defined certain key terms. Where referenced, the following terms have the
meaning provided in the MCTRA:
Medical Cannabis is defined in Minnesota Statute § 152.22, Subd. 6:
(a) “Medical cannabis” means any species of the genus cannabis plant, or any mixture or
preparation of them, including whole plant extracts and resins, and is delivered in the
form of:
1. liquid, including, but not limited to, oil;
2. pill;
3. vaporized delivery method with use of liquid or oil but which does not
require the use of dried leaves or plant form; or
4. any other method, excluding smoking, approved by the commissioner.
5. This definition includes any part of the genus cannabis plant prior to being
processed into a form allowed under paragraph (a), that is possessed by a
person while that person is engaged in employment duties necessary to
carry out a requirement under sections 152.22 to 152.37 for a registered
manufacturer or a laboratory under contract with a registered
manufacturer.
Medical Cannabis Manufacturer as defined in Minnesota Statute § 152.22, Subd. 7:
“Medical cannabis manufacturer" or “manufacturer” means an entity registered by the
commissioner to cultivate, acquire, manufacture, possess, prepare, transfer, transport,
supply, or dispense medical cannabis, delivery devices, or related supplies and
educational materials.
Patient as defined in Minnesota Statute § 152.22, Subd. 9:
“Patient” means a Minnesota resident who has been diagnosed with a qualifying medical
condition by a health care practitioner and who has otherwise met any other requirements
for patients under sections 152.22 to 152.37 to participate in the registry program under
sections 152.22 to 152.37.
62
Health Care Practitioner as defined in Minnesota Statute § 152.22, Subd. 4:
“Health care practitioner” means a Minnesota licensed doctor of medicine, a Minnesota
licensed physician assistant acting within the scope of authorized practice, or a Minnesota
licensed advanced practice registered nurse who has the primary responsibility for the
care and treatment of the qualifying medical condition of a person diagnosed with a
qualifying medical condition.
Registered Designated Caregiver as defined in Minnesota Statute § 152.22, Subd. 11:
“Registered designated caregiver” means a person who:
1. is at least 21 years old;
2. does not have a conviction for a disqualifying felony offense;
3. has been approved by the commissioner to assist a patient who has been
identified by a health care practitioner as developmentally or physically
disabled and therefore unable to self-administer medication or acquire
medical cannabis from a distribution facility due to the disability; and
4. is authorized by the commissioner to assist the patient with the use of
medical cannabis.
In addition, the following term was defined in the Interim Ordinance:
Cannabis Facility shall mean any business or facility operated for the purpose of
cultivating, acquiring, manufacturing, possessing, preparing, transferring, transporting,
supplying, or dispensing Medical Cannabis or any related supplies.
2.2 The Status of Medical Cannabis Under Federal Law
The Federal Controlled Substances Act classifies marijuana (cannabis) as a Schedule I
substance. 21 U.S.C. § 811 et seq. Schedule I substances are considered to have a high potential
for dependency and no accepted medical use. The possession and distribution of Schedule I
substances, including marijuana is a federal offense. The federal sentencing guidelines impose
increased penalties for distributing of marijuana within 1,000 feet of a school, playground, or
public housing. 21 U.S.C. § 860.
The U.S. Department of Justice issued a “Memorandum for Selected U. S. Attorneys on
Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana” on
October 19, 2009, indicating that it did not intend to prosecute individuals whose actions are in
compliance with state laws on medical use of marijuana (referred to as the “Ogden Memo”).
Despite the Ogden Memo, the U.S. Department of Justice has prosecuted operators of medical
marijuana facilities and threatened to seize property on which medical marijuana facilities
operate.
2.3 Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) and Resolution Adopting Study
The City adopted the Interim Ordinance on February 24, 2015, which prohibited medical
cannabis manufacturers and cannabis facilities in the City for the period of one year in order to
63
study their potential impact. In addition to placing a moratorium on cannabis facilities, the
Interim Ordinance directed City staff to prepare this study.
In order to protect the right of the City’s residents to receive lawful medical care, the
Interim Ordinance specified that “[n]othing in this Interim Ordinance shall be construed to
prohibit any Health Care Practitioner from writing a prescription for Medical Cannabis or any
Patient or Registered Designated Caregiver from possessing and administering Medical Cannabis
in compliance with the law.”
3.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY
Because the recent change in the legal status of medical cannabis under Minnesota law
and its potential to affect the City’s zoning controls, the City felt the need to conduct this Study.
The goals of the Study are as follows:
• Determine the status of medical cannabis under the City Code;
• Determine the status of medical cannabis manufacturers and facilities under the
City’s Zoning Code;
• Determine whether the Zoning Code’s application to medical cannabis
manufacturers and facilities is consistent with the City’s intent in planning for
property use within its zoning districts;
• Evaluate the challenges involved with regulating medical cannabis manufacturers
and facilities;
• Ensure that, if amended, the Zoning Code is improved in regards to consistency
and clarity with respect to medical cannabis manufacturers; and
• Ensure that the Zoning Code is consistent with state law pertaining to medical
cannabis.
64
4.0 ANALYSIS OF CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE ZONING CODE
This section provides information regarding the status of medical cannabis under the City
code generally and how the Zoning Code applies to medical cannabis manufacturers.
4.1 Status of Cannabis in the City Code
Chapter 131 of the City Code “Drugs and the Like” regulates drugs and controlled
substances within the City, including marijuana. The City Code states that “[n]o person may
manufacture, possess, constructively possess, sell, give away, barter, exchange, distribute, or
otherwise transfer any controlled substance, except by way of a lawful prescription by a person
licensed by law to prescribe and administer controlled substances.” City Code § 131.02.
However, these prohibitions do not apply to the exceptions listed in M.S. §§ 152.0974, 152.11,
or 152.12, or to the following activities in the ordinary course of lawful trade, business or
profession:
(A) Warehouse operators authorized by law to store controlled substances;
(B) Persons engaged in transporting controlled substances as an agent or employee of
an authorized practitioner, pharmacist, manufacturer, warehouse operator,
wholesaler, or common carrier;
(C) Public officers or public employees in the performance of official duties requiring
possession or control of controlled substances, or persons aiding the officers or
employees in the performance of the duties;
(D) A patient using controlled substances in accordance with prescribed treatment;
(E) Persons who procure, possess or use controlled substances for the purpose of
lawful research, teaching or testing, and not for sale; and
(F) Lawfully licensed and registered hospitals or bona fide clinics or other institutions
for treatment of sick or injured persons or animals.
Because medical cannabis may be lawfully prescribed under Minnesota Statutes
§ 152.22-37, Chapter 131 of the City Code does not prohibit the lawful manufacture, possession,
sale, or distribution of medical cannabis within the City.
In addition, Section 131.20 of the City Code prohibits the possession of marijuana but
includes an exception were the use is authorize by law. As a result, the City Code does not
prohibit the lawful possession or use of medical cannabis within the City.
4.2 City of Saint Anthony Village Zoning Code: Intent, Purpose, and
Interpretation
The City’s Zoning Code is located in Chapter 152 of the City Code. In interpreting and
applying the Zoning Code to zoning decisions, the City considers the intent and purposes of the
Zoning Code. City Code § 152.004.
The general intent of the Zoning Code is “to protect the health, safety, and general
welfare of the city and its people through the establishment of minimum regulations governing
land development and use.” City Code § 152.002.
65
The Zoning Code has nine stated purposes for its establishment:
1. Protect the use districts;
2. Promote orderly development and redevelopment;
3. Provide adequate light, air, and access to property;
4. Prevent congestion in the public streets;
5. Prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures by
regulating land, buildings, yards, and densities;
6. Provide for compatibility of different land uses;
7. Provide for administration and amendment of the Zoning Code;
8. Prescribe penalties for violations; and
9. Define the powers and duties of the city staff, the Board of Adjustments
and Appeals, the Planning Commission, and the City Council in relation to
the Zoning Code.
City Code § 152.002.
4.3 Zoning Districts
The City is divided into nine zoning districts (five residential, one commercial, one light
industrial, one recreational/open space, and PUD Planned Unit Development). The residential
districts occupy the vast majority of the City.
The zoning districts allow for permitted uses and permitted conditional uses. A permitted
use is “[a] use expressly authorized by the Zoning Code for a particular district or districts.” City
Code § 152.008 (Zoning Code definitions section). A permitted conditional use is “[a] use
which is not classified as a permitted use but which may be permitted subject to conditions
imposed by the City Council.” Id. “If a use is not specifically permitted, permitted by
conditional use permit, or prohibited, the use will be considered prohibited.” City Code §
152.006.
Each zoning district has a specifically stated purpose. Besides having different planning
goals and intentions, the zoning districts also differ in their allowance of certain types of
activities. These purposes and allowed uses that may pertain to cannabis facilities in each of the
nine zoning districts are listed below.
R-1 Single-Family District
Purpose: “to create and maintain areas which due to the natural amenities of the land,
low traffic volumes, and historical development patterns are best suited for single-family
detached residences.” City Code § 152.035. The R-1 District does not specifically permit any
use that would allow cannabis facilities. City Code § 152.036-37.
66
R-1A Single-Family Lakeshore District
Purpose: “to create and maintain lakeshore areas for single-family detached residences
which, due to the natural amenity of the lake, and the topographic characteristics, call for zoning
regulations which are somewhat different from other single-family districts and which are
designed for the preservation of natural areas.” City Code § 152.050. The R-1A District does
not specifically permit any use that would allow cannabis facilities. City Code § 152.052-53.
R-2 Two-Family District
Purpose: “to provide areas which are best suited for a higher density than single-family
dwellings, and which may serve as a transitional use between R-1 or R-1A Districts and other
districts.” City Code § 152.065. The R-2 District does not specifically permit any use that
would allow cannabis facilities. City Code § 152.066-67.
R-3 Townhouse District
Purpose: “to provide areas where the natural amenities such as trees, hills and bodies of
water are preserved by encouraging development of medium density housing surrounded by
common open space, which may serve as a transitional use between less dense residential
districts and other districts, and which provide for alternatives to 1- and 2-family detached
dwellings.” City Code § 152.085. The R-3 District does not specifically permit any use that
would allow cannabis facilities. City Code § 152.087-88.
R-4 Multiple-Family District
Purpose: “to provide areas for housing other than 1- and 2-family dwellings and
townhouses, and which may serve as a transitional use between less dense residential uses and
nonresidential uses.” City Code § 152.100. The R-4 District allows for service or convenience
type businesses, including pharmacies, as a permitted condition use. See City Code
§ 152.102(a).
C General Commercial District
Purpose: “to provide areas for retail sales and services located and regulated so as to
minimize adverse effects on neighboring residential districts and congestion of public streets.”
City Code § 152.120. Within the C District, “drug stores” and “Physicians, dentists and health
care professionals” are permitted uses. City Code § 152.121.
LI Light Industrial District
Purpose: “to designate areas for, and regulate the development of, light industry. Areas
are designated as light industrial due to the proximity of high capacity roadways or rail facilities
and existing development, and regulated to enhance the compatibility of light industrial uses and
uses within the commercial and residential districts.” City Code § 152.140. Within the LI
District, “[w]arehouses, wholesalers or distributors for pharmaceuticals” are a permitted use.
67
City Code § 152.141. The LI District allows for the permitted conditional use for “drug,
cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and toiletries manufacture.”
R/O Recreational/Open Space
Purpose: “regulate development in those areas which have significant natural amenities
such as trees, terrain, and water resources, and to regulate development for recreational purposes
in areas which have significant public or private recreational potential.” The R/O District does
not specifically permit any use that would allow cannabis facilities. City Code § 155-56.
PUD Planned Unit Development
Purpose: “to provide for planned unit developments within the city.” Each PUD District
is governed by its specific planned unit development ordinance. Due to the individual nature of
each PUD District, the status of medical cannabis is not analyzed under each individual PUD.
However, the PUD Districts are focused on “single or mixed uses” and may incorporate a
combination of uses allowed under residential, commercial, or industrial districts.
4.4 Interpretation of Medical Cannabis under the City’s Zoning Districts
No cannabis facilities are allowed in R-1, R-1A, R-2, R-3, or R/O Districts. However,
medical cannabis facilities would likely be an allowed use in R-4, C, and LI Districts. As a
result, there may be the potential for conflicting land uses in these districts if cannabis facilities
are allowed. Further detail on uses that may conflict with cannabis facilities is provided in
Section 5.
(a) Medical Cannabis in R-1, R-1A, R-2, R-3 and R/O Districts
The R-1, R-1A, R-2, R-3 and R/O Districts do not specifically permit any use that would
allow any type of cannabis facility. City Code § 152.036-37; 152.052-53; 152.066-67; 152.087-
88; 152.155-156. Therefore, no cannabis facilities are allowed in R-1, R-1A, R-2, R-3, or R/O
Districts.
(b) Medical Cannabis in the R-4 District
The R-4 District allows for service or convenience type businesses, including
pharmacies, as a permitted conditional use. See City Code § 152.102(a). The term “pharmacy”
is not defined in the City Code. Because medical cannabis must be dispensed by a licensed
pharmacist under State law, a medical cannabis dispenser would likely be considered a
pharmacist under the City Code. As a result, a medical cannabis dispenser would likely be a
conditional permitted use within the R-4 District and are not prohibited.
There is the potential for conflicting land uses within the R-4 District. State licensed day
care facilities are a permitted conditional use within the R-4 District. City Code § 152.102.
68
(c) Medical Cannabis in the C District
Within the C District, “drug stores” and “Physicians, dentists and health care
professionals” are permitted uses. City Code § 152.121. The terms “drug store” and “healthcare
professional” are not defined in the City Code. Because medical cannabis must be dispensed by
a licensed pharmacist under State law, a medical cannabis dispenser would likely be considered a
pharmacist under the City Code and would likely be considered a “drug store” or “health care
professional.” As a result, pharmacists or physicians that dispense medical cannabis would
likely be a permitted use within the C District and would not be prohibited.
There is the potential for conflicting land uses within the C District. The purpose of the
City’s commercial zoning district is “to provide areas for retail sales and services located and
regulated so as to minimize adverse effects on neighboring residential districts and congestion of
public streets.” City Code § 152.120. The types of uses allowed within this district are uses
associated with business and commerce. Permitted uses in the C District include day cares,
music schools, and dance schools.
Overall, the commercial zoning district occupies a relatively small portion of the City.
Areas of the City zoned “commercial” primarily exist along Silver Lake Road in the northern
part of the City and along Kenzie Terrace in the southwest part of the City. Some commercial
areas also exist on the western boundary of the City south of 33rd Avenue Northeast, along 37th
Avenue Northeast adjacent to the Soo Line Railroad tracks, and north of 39th Avenue Northeast.
The commercial zoning district abuts residential, recreational/open space districts, and schools in
numerous areas.
(d) Medical Cannabis in the LI District
Within the LI District, “[w]arehouses, wholesalers or distributors for pharmaceuticals”
are a permitted use. City Code § 152.141. The LI District allows for the permitted conditional
use of “drug, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and toiletries manufacture.” As a result, the manufacture
of medical cannabis would likely be a permitted conditional use in the LI District. The
warehousing or distribution of medical cannabis would likely be a permitted use in the LI
District.
There is the potential for conflicting land uses within the LI District. The purpose of the
City’s light industrial zoning district is “to designate areas for, and regulate the development of,
light industry. Areas are designated as light industrial due to the proximity of high capacity
roadways or rail facilities and existing development, and regulated to enhance the compatibility
of light industrial uses and uses within the commercial and residential districts.” City Code
§ 152.140. Day care centers are a permitted conditional use within the LI District
Overall, the light industrial zoning district occupies a relatively small portion of the City.
Areas of the City zoned “light industrial” primarily exist within two specific areas: (1) along or
near the Soo Line railroad in the northern part of the City and (2) north of the Northern Pacific
Railway in the southeast part of the City, including areas along U.S. Highway 88 and County
Road C. The light industrial district abuts residential and recreational/open space districts in
numerous areas.
69
5.0 IMPACT OF MEDICAL CANNABIS
5.1 Land Uses Sensitive to Medical Cannabis
A study by the American Bar Association identified a series of sensitive land uses that
cities around the country have determined were incompatible with medical cannabis.2 These
sensitive uses include residences, schools, child care centers, rehab centers, churches, parks,
libraries, cinemas, and recreation centers. A report by the Massachusetts Municipal Association
determined that “uses that are being considered as incompatible [to medical marijuana treatment
centers] are schools, day care centers, churches, residential areas and other medical marijuana
treatment centers.”3
5.2 Land Use Controls to Protect Sensitive Uses
To protect sensitive uses, almost all of the cities studied by the ABA adopted
requirements for a buffer between cannabis facilities and sensitive uses in order to protect the
sensitive uses.4 While the size of buffers implemented range from 250 feet to 1,320 feet, the
most common buffer was 1,000 feet, consistent with the federal policy to discourage marijuana
distribution within 1,000 feet of schools and certain other sensitive uses.5 For example, the City
of Bloomington has implemented a requirement for a 1,000-foot buffer between cannabis
facilities and existing schools.
In addition, most cities limit cannabis facilities to areas zoned commercial and industrial
or prohibit cannabis facilities in areas zoned residential and mixed use. Many cities have also
implemented a cap on the number of cannabis facilities within the jurisdiction.6
5.3 Sensitive Land Uses in St. Anthony
The sensitive uses most likely to be impacted by cannabis facilities in the C District or LI
District are residences, day care centers, and parks. A significant number of these sensitive uses
exist within areas that would be impacted by cannabis facilities. As a result, allowing medical
cannabis without controls to protect sensitive uses would likely have a significant and negative
impact on health, safety, and general welfare within the City. The existing sensitive uses that
would be negatively impacted by medical cannabis are as follows:
2 Nemeth, Jeremy and Ross, Eric, Planning for Marijuana: The Cannabis Conundrum, American Bar Association,
Section of State and Local Government Law and Section of Public Contract Law, Fall 2014, available at
http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/state_local_government/2014%20Fall%20Council%20Meeting
/reefer-madness/NemethRoss.authcheckdam.pdf.
3Saint Andre, Barbara, Medical Marijuana: Land Use Concerns, Massachusetts Municipal Association Annual
Meeting 2013, available at https://www.mma.org/resources-mainmenu-182/doc_view/775-medical-marijuana-land-
use-concerns.
4 Nemeth, supra at note 2. 5 Id. 6 Id.
70
(a) Residential Districts
All LI and C Districts within the City abut residential districts.
(b) Day Care Centers
The Minnesota Department of Health and Safety lists eleven licensed child care centers
and family child care facilities in St. Anthony. Five of the day care centers are located in the LI
District or within 1,000 feet of the LI District. The locations of these day care centers are as
follows:7
• 3900 block of Fordham Drive NE
• 3300 Block of Edgemere Avenue
• 2800 block of Anthony Lane S
• 3000 block of Wilson Street NE
• 3000 block of Old Highway
Two day care centers are located within the C District.
• 2900 block of Pentagon Drive
• 2500 block of Kenzie Terrace
(c) Parks
The following parks are located within 1,000 feet of the LI District
• Trillium Park
• Silver Point Park
• Francis A. Gross Golf Course
• Emerald Park
• Sunset Memorial Park
5.4 Public Safety
There are a number of public safety challenges associated with medical cannabis.
Bloomington recently adopted an ordinance regulating medical cannabis.8 In considering the
ordinance, the City of Bloomington conducted a study that identified the following challenges
associated with medical cannabis in Minnesota:
• Physicians, nurse practitioners, and physicians’ assistants cannot prescribe
medical cannabis under their licensing restrictions;
• A distribution facility functions as a stand-alone clinic where patients must be
examined by a pharmacist;
7 The names and exact addresses of the day care programs are not provided in this report to protect the day care
programs. 8 City of Bloomington, Ordinance No. 2015-27, adopted October 19, 2015.
71
• Many of the medical conditions for which medical cannabis is allowed mean they
are vulnerable due to their medical conditions;
• Due to federal law, credit card companies will not authorize transactions
involving medical cannabis, which forces medical cannabis distributors to operate
as ‘cash only’ businesses;
• Insurance companies will not cover medical marijuana and the cost of medical
cannabis ranges from $55 to $85 per gram; totaling an average of $500 per cash
transaction.
• Due to the uncovered, high cost of medical marijuana there has developed a black
market for stolen medical marijuana which is then sold to qualified patients and
others at a lower cost.
As a result, the study concluded that medical cannabis creates a public safety concern,
including a serious security concern for patients visiting medical cannabis distributors, an
increase risk of employee theft, an increased risk of burglary and non-employee theft from the
building.9
To address these concerns, the City of Bloomington adopted licensing requirements for
cannabis facilities that included maintaining records of transactions; restricting the hours of
operation to 7:00 am to 7:00 pm; requiring security that mirror the security procedures required
by the Minnesota Department of Health; limiting exterior signage to minimize attention; require
an ATM so that patients do not have to carry cash; requiring city or police inspections;
prohibiting paraphernalia or other merchandise.10 The City of Bloomington also requires a
1,000-foot buffer between cannabis facilities and schools.
In addition to these controls, Bloomington’s study recommended limiting the number of
distribution facilities to one per 100,000 city residents, which the ordinance adopted. According
to the U.S. Census Bureau, Bloomington has a population of approximately 83,000 residents. By
comparison, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates the City of St. Anthony’s population at
approximately 8,600 residents.11
9 See City of Bloomington, Request for Council Action, Case 10000G-15, dated October 19,
2015.
10 Id. 11 Id.
72
6.0 OPTIONS FOR MEDICAL CANNABIS
6.1 No Action
The first option for the City is to take no action. If the City takes no action, medical
cannabis dispensaries would likely be treated as pharmacies under the Zoning Code because
medical cannabis dispensaries must be operated by a pharmacist and “pharmacy” is not a defined
term in the Zoning Code. As a result, taking no action would mean medical cannabis dispensers
would likely be a permitted conditional use in the R-4 District, a permitted use in the C District,
and a permitted use in the LI District. Furthermore, manufacture and distribution of medical
cannabis would be a permitted use in the LI District.
Taking no action could create inconsistent land uses because cannabis facilities would be
allowed in the vicinity of residential areas, day care centers, schools, parks, libraries and other
incompatible uses. As a result, taking no action could adversely affect existing businesses,
development, and residential home values. For these reasons, this option is not recommended
because it will not protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the City and its people.
6.2 Restricting Cannabis Facilities to LI District Subject to a Buffer
The second option is for the City to adopt amendments the Zoning Code to make
cannabis facilities a permitted conditional use only in the LI District. Cannabis facilities would
be prohibited in all other districts. Cannabis facilities in the LI District would be subject to a
buffer requiring the cannabis facilities to be located a certain distance from any sensitive use,
including residential areas, day care centers, schools, parks, and libraries. Restricting cannabis
facilities to the LI District would exclude cannabis facilities from the R-4 and C Districts, but
would allow medical cannabis manufacturers to operate in the LI District.
This option is not recommended because the City cannot impose a sufficient buffer
distance that would allow medical cannabis facilities as a conditionally permitted use while still
protecting sensitive uses. Most cities, including Bloomington, use a 1,000-foot buffer to protect
sensitive uses. In the City, however, all of the area within the LI District is within 1,000 feet of a
residential district, a park, day care or other sensitive use. A 1,000-foot buffer would, in effect,
prohibit cannabis facilities within the City. In order to allow cannabis facilities as a permitted
conditional use, the City would have to adopt a buffer that is significantly less than the 1,000-
foot buffer that most cities require. As a result, there would be a heightened risk that cannabis
facilities would impact sensitive uses within the City.
Even with a smaller buffer distance, there would still be conflicting land uses. Day care
centers are a permitted conditional use within the LI District. Allowing cannabis facilities in the
LI District could limit further development of day care centers within the LI District.
For these reasons, this option is not recommend because it will not protect the health,
safety, and general welfare of the City and its people.
73
6.3 Prohibiting All Cannabis Facilities in the City
The third option is for the City to adopt an amendment to the Zoning Code prohibiting
cannabis facilities within the City. This option would protect sensitive uses, including residential
areas, day care centers, schools, parks, and libraries, throughout the City. Unlike the other
options, this option would also protect the development of child care centers in the LI District.
This option is recommended because it will protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
City and its people.
If the City chooses to adopt this option, the City should consider language clarifying that
the legal use of medical cannabis under State law is not prohibited within the City in order to
protect the right of the City’s residents to receive legal medical treatment.
7.0 CONCLUSION
Due to the location of the LI and C Districts within the City, the presence of cannabis
facilities as an allowed use within the City would create the potential for conflicting uses
between cannabis facilities and sensitive uses—including residential districts, parks, and day
care centers—and would create a threat to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City and
its people. The land use controls adopted by other cities to address this concern—buffers
between cannabis facilities and sensitive uses—would not be an effective control for the City
because the buffers would either have the effect of prohibiting all cannabis facilities or the
buffers would be too small to prevent the potential impacts from cannabis facilities. As a result,
this study recommends that the City amend the Zoning Code to prohibit cannabis facilities in
order to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the City and its people.
74
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 16-027
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FINDINGS FROM A STUDY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CONSIDERING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ZONING CODE REGARDING THE
REGULATION OF MEDICAL CANNABIS MANUFACTURERS AND CANNABIS
FACILITIES AND ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE TO
IMPLEMENT OPTION 3 OUTLINED IN SAID STUDY
WHEREAS, the 2014 Minnesota Session Laws Chapter 311, §§ 1-22, codified at Minnesota
Statutes § 152.22-37, legalized and established regulations for medical cannabis and medical
cannabis manufacturers;
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village Zoning Code does not regulate medical cannabis
business and establishments;
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted an interim ordinance prohibiting medical cannabis
manufacturers and cannabis facilities on February 24, 2015;
WHEREAS, the interim ordinance authorized a study regarding the regulation of medical
cannabis manufacturers and cannabis facilities;
WHEREAS, the study regarding the regulation of medical cannabis manufacturers and cannabis
facilities titled A Study for the Purpose of Considering Amendments to the City Zoning Code
Regarding the Regulation of Medical Cannabis Manufacturers and Cannabis Facilities (the
“Study”) has been completed and has been made available to the public and the City’s Planning
Commission;
WHEREAS, the Study identified the potential for sensitive uses, including residential areas, day
care centers, schools, and parks, to be negatively impacted by cannabis facilities;
WHEREAS, the Study evaluated land use controls that would allow the development of
cannabis facilities while protecting sensitive uses;
WHEREAS, the Study determined that the land use controls would be incapable of protecting
sensitive uses while still allowing cannabis facilities due to the unique characteristics of the City
of St. Anthony Village;
WHEREAS, the Study recommended pursuing Option 3 – Prohibiting All Cannabis Facilities in
the City in order to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of St. Anthony and
its people;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the Study and a text
amendment to the City of St. Anthony Village Zoning Code adopting Option 3 on February 22,
2016;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St.
Anthony Village accepts the findings and recommendations documented in the Study.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of St. Anthony Village adopts the following text amendment to the City of St. Anthony Village
Zoning Code to implement Option 3 in the Study:
75
§ 152.008
Cannabis Facility (aka Marijuana Dispensary). An establishment or business which
cultivates, acquires, manufactures, possesses, prepares, transfers, transports, supplies, or
dispenses medical cannabis or any related supplies in accordance with Minnesota Statutes
§ 152.22.
§ 152.188 Cannabis Facilities (aka Marijuana Dispensary)
(A) Cannabis Facilities are prohibited in all districts.
(B) The prohibition on Cannabis Facilities shall not be construed to prohibit any
health care practitioner from writing a prescription for medical cannabis or any patient or
registered designated caregiver from possessing and administering medical cannabis in
compliance with the law.
Adopted this 8th day March, 2016.
_____________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:____________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: ______________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
76
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: March 8, 2016
Ordinance-Amending Sections 152.008 and 152.188 of City Code pertaining to Medical Cannabis
Facilities
OVERVIEW:
Following the adoption of Resolution 16-027 accepting Findings from the Study for the Purpose of
Considering Amendments to the City Zoning Code Regarding the Regulation of Medical Cannabis
Manufacturers and Cannabis Facilities, is an Ordinance to amend sections of the City Code pertaining
to Medical Cannabis Facilities.
77
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
78
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 2016-01
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 152.008 DEFINITIONS TO ADD DEFINITION
OF CANNABIS FACILITY (AKA MARIJUANA DISPENSARY) AND ADDING SECTION
§152.188 CANNABIS FACILITIES (AKA MARIJUANA DISPENSARY); TO PROHIBIT
SUCH FACILITIES IN ALL DISTRICTS
The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows:
Section One. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code to Amend
Section §152.008. Section §152.008 of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is
hereby amended as follows. The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The
additional language is represented by double underlined text.
§152.008 DEFINITIONS.
Cannabis Facility (aka Marijuana Dispensary). An establishment or business which
cultivates, acquires, manufactures, possesses, prepares, transfers, transports, supplies, or
dispenses medical cannabis or any related supplies in accordance with Minnesota Statutes
§ 152.22.
Section Two. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code to Add
Section §152.188 Cannabis Facilities (aka Marijuana Dispensary). Section §152.188 of the City
Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby amended as follows. The deleted language
is represented by strikethrough text. The additional language is represented by double
underlined text.
§152.188 CANNABIS FACILITIES (AKA MARIJUANA DISPENSARY)
(A) Cannabis Facilities are prohibited in all districts.
(B) The prohibition on Cannabis Facilities shall not be construed to prohibit any
health care practitioner from writing a prescription for medical cannabis or any patient or
registered designated caregiver from possessing and administering medical cannabis in
compliance with the law.
Section Three. Findings for Amending the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code by
Amending Sections 152.008 and Section 152.188. In amending the City of Saint Anthony
Village City Code by amending Sections 152.008 and Section 152.188 relating to the regulations
of cannabis facilities (aka marijuana dispensary), the City Council of the City of Saint Anthony
79
Village finds that the amendment is required for the public good; is in the interest of public
health, safety and welfare; and is compatible with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Section Four. Effective Date. This Ordinance amendment shall be in full force and
effect upon its publication as provided by law.
Passed in regular session of the City Council on March 8, 2016.
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
By:_________________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:_________________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Adopted-March 8, 2016
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
Publication Date: March 16, 2016
80
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 16-028
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID
FOR THE 2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement as shown on the plan for the
above-referenced project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the
following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor Total Bid
1 R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. $2,060,276.95
2 LaTour Construction, Inc. $2,082,371.05
3 Northdale Construction Co., Inc. $2,505,601.56
4 S.R. Weidema, Inc. $2,651,130.34
5 Park Construction Company $11,402,626.55
WHEREAS, it appears that R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. of St. Cloud, MN is the lowest responsible
bidder,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $2,060,276.95 in the name of the
City of St. Anthony Village, Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above-
referenced project according to the plans and specifications, therefore, approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The Engineer, WSB & Associates, Inc., is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the
successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has
been signed.
Adopted this 8th day of March , 2016.
_____________________________
Jerome O Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:____________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: ______________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
81
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
82
PROJECT:
and Appurtenant Work
OWNER:
City of St. Anthony Village
WSB PROJECT NO.:
2170-13
Bids Opened: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 10 a.m.
Contractor Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 2 Bid Security (5%)Grand Total Bid
1 R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc.X X X $2,060,276.95
2 LaTour Construction, Inc.X X X $2,082,371.05
3 Northdale Construction Co., Inc.X X X $2,505,601.56
4 S.R. Weidema, Inc.X X X $2,651,130.34
5 Park Construction Company X X X $11,402,626.55
Engineer's Opinion of Cost $2,188,485.50
Denotes corrected figure
Justin Messner, PE Project Manager
BID TABULATION SUMMARY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on January 27, 2016.
2016 Street and Utility Improvement Project
83
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
84
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: March 8, 2016
Resolution-Authorizing Participation in the 2016-2017 GreenCorp’s Program
OVERVIEW:
In front of you this evening is a Resolution to authorize staff submitting an application to be a
GreenCorp host site for the 2016-2017 program year.
Minnesota GreenCorp is an AmeriCorp Program coordinated by the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA). The goal of MN GreenCorp is to preserve and protect Minnesota’s environment
while training a new generation of environmental professionals.
The City of St. Anthony applied and was awarded a GreenCorp member for the 2012-2013 and
2015-2016 program year. With the assistance of the GreenCorp member, the City has established
several sustainable programs that will continue to benefit the City for many years to come. The
GreenCorp member would be compensated by the MPCA and St. Anthony would be responsible for
supervision and office space.
85
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
86
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 16-029
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE
2016-2017 GREENCORPS PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony had applied to host an AmeriCorps member from the
Minnesota GreenCorps, a program of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA), for the 2012-2013 and 2015-2016 program year; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony was awarded to host an AmeriCorps member from the
Minnesota GreenCorps for the 2012-2013 and 2015-2016 program year; and
WHEREAS the City of St. Anthony desires to apply to host an AmeriCorps member from
the Minnesota GreenCorps, for the 2016-2017 program year; and
WHEREAS, the MPCA requires that the City of St. Anthony enter into a host site
agreement with the MPCA that identifies the terms, conditions, roles and
responsibilities.
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of St. Anthony hereby agrees to enter into and sign a
host site agreement with the MPCA to carry out the member activities specified therein and
to comply with all of the terms, conditions, and matching provisions of the host site
agreement and authorizes and directs the City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its
behalf.
Adopted this 8th day March, 2016.
_____________________________
Jerome O. Faust, Mayor
ATTEST:____________________________
Nicole Miller, City Clerk
Reviewed for administration: ______________________________
Mark Casey, City Manager
87
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
88
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: March 8, 2016
2016 Strategic Plan
OVERVIEW:
In front of you this evening is the 2016 Strategic Plan. On January 14th and 15th, 2016, City Council,
department heads, consultants and special guests joined together to collaboratively create goals and the
strategic plan for the City of St. Anthony in 2016.
Prior to creating goals for 2016, the group reviewed and discussed: the City of St. Anthony’s 2015
Goals and Accomplishments, 2018 Comprehensive Plan background information, long term
vision/priorities, emerging issues, and strengths and opportunities.
The Strategic Plan outlines the collaborative process that the group followed to develop the 2016
Pyramid for the City of St. Anthony.
89
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
90
St. Anthony Fire Department 2015
Annual Report
Fire Department Divisions
Fire Inspections
Code Enforcement
Fire Prevention
Public Education
Operations
Training
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Emergency Management
91
24 Active Firefighters
3 Rookies In-Training
2 Part-Time Code Enforcement
Employees
Operations
PERSONNEL
CALL RESPONSE
VEHICLES
EQUIPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
92
Total Calls For Service
58% Increase
2001 - 901
2015 - 1425
Call Breakdown
Medical Calls – 74%
Fire/Other - 26%
26
31
181
45
78
2
1,062
FIRES
HAZARDOUS CONDITION
SERVICE CALL
GOOD INTENT
FALSE ALARMS
WEATHER RELATED
MEDICAL CALLS
- 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
Number of Calls
FIRES HAZARDOUS
CONDITION SERVICE CALL GOOD INTENT FALSE
ALARMS
WEATHER
RELATED
MEDICAL
CALLS
Call Breakdown 26 31 181 45 78 2 1,062
Call Breakdown
93
Dollar Loss from Fire
. In 2014 the average Fire Loss statewide was $41,359 per 1000 people. For the City of St. Anthony that
would be ~8300 population or expected loss of 8.3 X $41,350 = $343,280. Our actual loss for 2015 is about
$255,000 or about 74% of the expected average loss based on population using 2014 state numbers.
Fire Investigations
Incident Damage
House Fire $114,335 building, $50,000 contents
Cause determined to be electrical fixture in ceiling of bathroom – electrical shorting.
Vehicle Fire $20,000
Cause undetermined – presumed electrical. Arson ruled out. Vehicle a total loss.
Kitchen Fire $17,000 appliance, carpeting, finishes
Cause accidental – ream of paper left on stove that was on. Sprinkler extinguished fire.
Trash Can Fire $35,000 Clean up and finish work due to smoke damage
Cause carelessly discarded matches/wick in garbage can by juvenile.
Outside Fire $14,500 Total loss on pool filter system, riding lawn mower, etc.
Cause electrical short in operating pool pump. Fire caused damage to nearby shed and
riding lawn mower.
94
Average Patient Age: 69.5 years
Average Response Time: 2
minutes 24 seconds
Operations Summary
Training
OSHA Mandate 24 hours annually
SAFD average in 2015: 110.4 hours
Department Wide: 2649 hours
EMT, Live Fire, Vehicle Extrication, Hazmat,
Weather Emergencies, Power lines, OSHA,
NIMS, Physical Abilities Test, Water Rescue,
Building Construction and Size-Ups
95
Fire Inspections
General Fire Inspections: 238
Total Hours : 171
High Hazard
Assembly
General Business
Apartments
Pre-Planning
Number # 2013 # 2014 # 2015
Inspection s 88 256 238
Time 2013 2014 2015 Staff Hrs.
Inspections 66 214 171
Also documented in Image Trend are other Fire Code Activities . This includes things like correspondence,
training, data entry, code research, and returning phone calls.
Activity 2013 2014 2015 Staff Hrs
Fire Marshal Duties 86.5 150 190
Training 86
Preplan Activities 14.5 4 85
Other Activities 45.5 85
Total 146.5 239 361
Fire Marshal
Chris Fuller
Fire Marshal Duties
Total Hours: 361
Correspondence
Training
Code Research
Plan Review
Data Entry
96
Fire Prevention\Public Education
1,653 Members of the Public Received our Message
429 Hours Documented
School Visits Open House
CPR Severe Weather
Fire Extinguishers First Aid
Code Enforcement - Housing
Vegetation 49%
Misc. 7%
Parking/Tabs 16%
Signs 8%
Structure/Yard Maint. 15%
Garbage Cans 5%
97
Code Enforcement - Rental
190 Rental\Re-Inspections
Rental Units Total Citywide: 1626
Single Family: 49
Duplex: 24
Triplex: 2
Condos: 10
Mobile Home: 2
Townhomes: 8
Apartment Complexes: 14
Outcomes
98
Committed to Serve
Questions?
99
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
100
2015 Annual Report
Convenient Locations
Silver Lake Village
Store is located at
2602 39th Ave.
Marketplace Store
is located at 2700
Highway 88.
101
Mission Statement
Our goal is to actively prevent
the sale of beverages that contain
alcohol to minors and intoxicated
persons, while simultaneously
generating revenue for the
community, in accordance with
all city, state and county liquor
laws and ordinances.
Vision Statement
The St. Anthony Village Wine and
Spirits brand is committed to
providing a unique retail
environment that is based on
excellent customer service,
product selection, competitive
pricing, while providing safe,
bright and clean stores that drive
long term customer loyalty.
102
Our Profits are used for:
Reducing the
Property Tax Levy
Providing Funds for
Special Projects
Providing Funds for
Equipment
Purchases for all City
Departments
The Value of Municipal Liquor Operation Revenue
2015 Sales Projection (August ‘15)
SALES
2011 2012 2013 2014
JAN-JUN $3,206,023 46% $3,455,245 48% $3,226,704 46% $3,027,107 49%
JUL-DEC $3,789,899 54% $3,689,380 52% $3,745,895 54% $3,109,215 51%
TOTAL $6,995,922 $7,144,625 $6,972,599 $6,136,322
AVG 2015
$3,228,770 47% $2,741,792 49%
$3,583,597 53% $2,853,702 51%
$6,812,367 $5,595,494
JAN-JUN
JUL-DEC
TOTAL
2015 ACTUAL
$2,741,792 46%
$3,213,066 54%
$5,954,858
(unaudited)
103
2015 Net Income Projection (August ‘15)
NET INCOME
2011 2012 2013 2014
JAN-JUN $179,479 39% $246,714 47% $212,129 43% $136,716 52%
JUL-DEC $282,556 61% $277,590 53% $278,267 57% $126,226 48%
TOTAL $462,313 $529,273 $503,494 $262,943
AVG 2015
$193,759 45% $84,214 49%
$241,160 55% $87,651 51%
$434,919 $171,865
JAN-JUN
JUL-DEC
TOTAL
2015 ACTUAL
$84,214 35%
$156,853 65%
$241,067
(unaudited)
2015 Monthly Sales Trend
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Monthly Sales
2012 2013 2014 2015
104
5 Year Profit History
$462,313
$529,273
$503,494
$262,943
$241,067
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
$450,000
$500,000
$550,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
10 Year Profit History
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
550,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
105
$1,740,247
30%
$2,551,648
42%
$1,487,487
25% Spirits
Beer
Mix & Misc.
$175,476
3%
Wine
Sales by
Category
23%
18.5%
30%
Mix &
Misc.
34%
Beer
Wine Spirits
Gross Profit
Percentage
by Category
30%
34%
32%
Mix &
Misc.
4%
Beer
Wine Spirits
Percentage of
Gross Profit
by Category
Sales
Comparisons and Benchmarks
Turn Ratio = 6 Times Per Year
Inventory Value = 14% of Total Sales
Labor Cost = 11% of Total Sales
Total Operating Expense of 19%
Sales Per Square Foot = $650.00
Ranked 8th in the State in Total Sales
Ranked 9th out of 19 in Metro Area in
Net Profits
106
2015 Accomplishments
Passed All Compliance Checks
Completed Beverage Alcohol
Certification
Recycled 16 Tons of Cardboard
Lillie Newspaper “Reader’s
Choice Award” for “Best Beer
Selection”.
2015 Accomplishments (cont.)
Attended National
Alcohol Beverage
Control Association
Conference
Physical Inventory
Counts (.004%)
Attended Night to
Unite
Safety Inspections
107
2015 Events
Beer Events at
Marketplace
throughout
Summer
Spring and
Holiday Wine
Events at
Marketplace
Multiple
Samplings at
Silver Lake Village
Looking Ahead……2016
Credit Card
Services to Accept
EMV Technology
Legislative Issues
Sampling Events
Facilities
Assessment
108
Website:
Monthly Specials
Coupons
Events
Staff Bio’s
Product Requests
Customer Survey
Contact Us
Awards
Facebook
www.stanthonyvillagewineandspirits.com
Entire report available on the
city’s website at
www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us
109
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
110
Date Type Staff Present
March 22 Regular
Public Works Annual Report
Police Annual Report
Finance Annual Report
2016 Street Project Call for Sale of Bonds
City Council
City Manager
Public Works Director
Police Dept
Finance Director
March 28 Special
5:30pm Joint meeting with Planning Commission City Council
City Manager
March 28 7:00 p.m.Worksession City Council
City Manager
March 29 Special
5:30 p.m.Joint Meeting with School Board City Council
City Manager
April 12 Regular
Planning Commission Items from March
2016 Street Project Public Hearing on Tax Abatement
Quarterly Donations & Grants
City Council
City Manager
April 20 Special
6:30 pm Joint Meeting-Council, Planning, Dept Heads-Southern Gateway Redevelopment Study
City Council
City Manager
Department Heads
April 26 Regular
Arbor Day Proclamation
GreenCorp Presentation
1st Quarter Goals Update
Public Hearing-Budget Calendar
Commissioner Mary Jo McGuire
City Council
City Manager
May 2 Special
5:30 p.m.Worksession City Council
City Manager
May 10 Regular
Swear In new Police Officers
Retiring Police Chief and Captain Presentation
2016 Street Project Bond Sale and Award of Bonds
City Council
City Manager
Police Chief
May 17 Special
4:00 pm Tour of the City
City Council
City Manager
Department Heads
May 24 Regular
Salo Park Concert Series
Insurance Renewal
Tort Limits - Consent
City Council
City Manager
Police Chief
May 31 Special
5:30 p.m.Joint Meeting with School Board City Council
City Manager
May 31 Special
7:00 p.m.Worksession City Council
City Manager
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
2016
111
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
June 14 Regular Planning Commission Items from May
Order Feasibility Report for 2017 Street Project
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
June 28 Regular
Audit Presentation
Debt Levy Presentation
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
July 12 Regular
Planning Commission items from June
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Quarterly Goals Update
VillageFest Presentation
City Council
City Manager
July 26 Regular Night to Unite Presentation
Night to Unite Proclamation
City Council
City Manager
Police Chief
August 1 Special
5:30 p.m.Worksession City Council
City Manager
August 2 Special Night to Unite
City Council
City Manager
August 9 Regular
Planning Commission items from July
SANB #282 Presentation
City Council
City Manager
August 23 Regular
Budget Presentation
Liquor Operations Mid-Year Report
New Police Chief and Captain Presentation
City Council
City Manager
Liquor Op Mgr
Finance Director
August 30 Special
5:30 p.m.Joint Meeting with School Board
City Council
City Manager
August 30 Special
7:00 p.m.Worksession
City Council
City Manager
September 13 Regular
Planning Commission items from August
2017 Preliminary Operating Budget and Levy-Public Hearing
2017 Street Project Accept Feasiblity Report, Order Plans and Specifications
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
September 27 Regular
Fire Prevention Presentation
Kiwanis Peanut Day
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
October 3 Special
5:30 p.m.Worksession City Council
City Manager
October 11 Regular
Planning Commission items from September
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Certification of Delinquent Accounts
City Council
City Manager
112
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
October 25 Regular Quarterly Goals Update
Ordinance Setting Fees for 2016 - 1st Reading-Public Hearing
City Council
City Manager
October 31 Special
5:30 p.m.Worksession City Council
City Manager
November 8 Regular 2016 General Election
City Council
City Manager
November 8 Regular
8:00 pm Ordinance Setting Water & Sewer Rates for 2017 - 1st Reading-Public Hearing
City Council
City Manager
November 22 Regular
Ordinance Setting Water & Sewer Rates for 2017 - 2nd Reading
Fire Prevention Poster Winners
Tree Care Ordinance
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
Police Dept
Fire Dept
November 29 Special
5:30 p.m.Joint Meeting with School Board City Council
City Manager
November 29 Special
7:00 p.m.Worksession City Council
City Manager
December 13 Regular
Planning Commission items from November
Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs
Setting Salary of City Manager
Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds
Setting the 2017 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy -Public Hearing
Ordinance Setting the Water& Sewer Rates for 2017 - final reading
2017 Street Project Approve Plans & Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids
2017 Fee Schedule
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
December 27 Regular
City Council
City Manager
January 10 Regular
Swearing in new councilmembers
Housekeeping Resolutions
Resolution for the Street Improvement Bond Reimbursement
Quarterly Donations & Grants
City Council
City Manager
January 12 & 13 Special Goal Setting
City Council
City Manager
Department Heads
2017
113
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
January 24 Regular
2017 Parks Commission Work Plan- (motion only)
2017 Planning Commission Work Plan-(motion only)
Presentation-Northeast Youth and Family Services
Northeast Youth and Family Services Agreement
City Council
City Manager
February 14 Regular
Planning Commission items from January
Administration Annual Report
2017 Street Project Call for Hearing on Improvements, Call for Hearing on Assessments,
Order Preparation of Assessments
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
February 28 Regular City Council
City Manager
March 14 Regular
Fire Relief Ratifying Pension Benefit
Planning Commission Items from February
Liquor Annual Report
Fire Annual Report
2017 Street Project Public Hearing, Order Improvements, Adopt & Confirm Assessments,
Award Contract for Construction, Call for Sale of GO Bonds
2017 Strategic Plan (motion only)
Liquor License Renewals
GreenCorp Member application-resolution
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
Liquor Op Manager
Items Pending:
~ Worksessions
114