HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 09071999 Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
106469
Box: 37
Folder: CC PACKETS 1999
Document: CC PACKET 09071999
. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
September 7, 1999
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Page(s)
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. REVIEW 29TH AVENUE NE STREET AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (T. Hubmer, WSB, Inc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 2a
IV. REVIEW SANITARY SEWER STUDY (T. Hubmer, WSB, Inc.) . . . . . . 3 - 4*
V. DISCUSS 33RD AVENUE NE STREET AND SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 6
. VI. REVIEW TAX LEVY AND BUDGET RESOLUTION AND
OTHER BUDGET ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 13
VII. REVIEW HENNEPIN COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT RESOLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 22
VIII. REVIEW METRO TRANSIT AGREEMENT RESOLUTION . . . . . . . . . 23 - 38
IX. REVIEW METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES
RESOLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 - 41
X. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUSINESS ASSISTANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 - 46
XI. REVIEW STUDY ON FINANCING VARIOUS CITY
PROJECTS (Springsted) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 - 60**
XII. DISCUSS FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
* WSB Sewer Study attached.
** Springsted Financial Capacity/Debt Plan attached.
DORS EY & WHITNEY L L P
MINNEAPOLIS PILLSBURY CENTER SOUTH NEW YORK
WASHINGTON,D C. 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET DENVER
LONDON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-1498 SEATTLE
BRUSSELS TELEPHONE: (612) 340-2600
FARGO
HONG KONG FAX: (612) 340-2868
DES MOINES BILLINGS
WILLIAM R.SOTH
ROCHESTER MISSOULA
(612)340-2969
COSTA MESA FAX(612)340-2644 GREAT•FALLS
soth.william®dorseylaw.com
September 3, 1999
Michael J. Mornson
City Manager
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Re: Lowry Mobil Home Park
Dear Mike:
As you will recall, Steve Berndt requested that the City grant Hobart Swan a license for
the fence along Kenzie Terrace which encroaches slightly onto the City right-of-way. When this
request was made, we told them that we needed to know the extent of the encroachment. I am
enclosing for you a copy of a portion of a survey which shows this. At the very southern end of
the fence, it is not encroaching. As shown by the drawing, it then encroaches about 1.8 feet near
the south end, and increases to an encroachment of about 8.2 feet at the north end. As indicated
in Steve Berndt's letter, if the fence were ever replaced, Hobart Swan would be required to move
it off of the City's right-of-way.
If the City is willing to go along with this, I would recommend that we also include a
provision that would require the fence to be moved if it becomes necessary for expansion of the
roadway or for other work requiring it to be moved, or if there is any safety issue with regard to
the fence.
Please let me know what you and the Council believe should be done with this.
Very truly ypurs,
William R. Soth
WRS/ms
IVERS N--
CLARKMAVERSON
npplm-
,' ,
LISA R.M31,11ER
August 31, 1999
OF COUNSEL-:
W.CHRIS RN'SEN.
William R. Soth
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
' Pillsbury Center South
220 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498
RE : Hobart Swan File
Dear Bill :
I am enclosing for you an updated survey regarding the
Lowry Grove Manufactured Home Park on Kenzie Terrace .
The surveyor has now identified the amount by which the
fence encoaches onto the right of way as described. On
the southwesterly end of the fence there is no overlap
and on the most northeasterly end of the property the
overlap is 8 .2 feet .
I would like to know whether or not the city would
grant Hobart Swan a license for the fence to remain on
the right of way and allow him to maintain it in its
present condition. If the fence were ever replaced, it
would have to be moved off the city' s right of way.
After you have had a chance to review this, please give
me a call so we can discuss how to best proceed to
resolve this problem.
Very truly yours,
Hanc .,,,�& Iverson,SL .
'<
Steven H. Berndt
SHB :cas
Enclosure
cc: Hobart Swan
P,46
I ^'
I
I Cl.
I 911, t
I� t
I p.
70 �` SEE DETAIL A
EX. I �nFn 5 t sA� PCO
w BLDG. I I NfN
GJ
u- I Nlo moo. G
o
ul
I
110101
o
w I I FENCELn
�0 P
Q �� GONG t
Lu '6.\
O 0, 20 FT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY ?� t
11�EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2447499.
LJ
LO
or-q'
In SQA
�• 1
o• F \ e� . That pc
E11% at a
Northpl
8L0
thence
W �i7r. \ I State F
n road wi
of begi
the Sot
t
t
•� t ham' ,
TAS
R 3
G
SEE DETAIL A
Y0
.,
V
�G•
G�
• �{. FOUND IRON
MONUMENT
+
+
+
+
i QO
+
DETAIL A
+ (NO SCALE)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 7, Township 29, Range 23, beginning
+ at a point in the South line of said tract 100 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence
North 1,079.8 feet; thence East perallel to the South line of said Quarter Section 1,041.74 feet;
thence South to center of State Highway No. 63; thence Southwesterly along said centerline of
+ State Highway No. 63 and St. Anthony and Taylor Falls Road to intersection of centerline of said
• : road with the South line of said Quarter Section; thence West along said latter line to the point
+ of beginning. Except that part thereof, embraced in the South 365 feet of the West 395 feet of
1
-a
the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 7 and except the Easterly 100 feet thereof.
+
+ is
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 7, 1999
TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: TAX RATE CERTIFICATION/PUBLIC HEARING
A new law requires that all cities over 500 population to pass a resolution if the levy for
the subsequent year will result in a tax rate increase. Under the law, the city council
must adopt a resolution at a public hearing if its levy will result in an increase in the tax
rate over the baseline tax rate. Essentially, a base line tax rate is computed based on
the prior year's levy and the current year tax base.
The intent of the law is to provide the public with added information about the levy
process. Specifically under the current calculation methods used, a city could increase
its levy or increase spending, yet experience a tax rate decrease due to an increase in
their Total Local Tax Capacity (valuation increasing). Citizens could incorrectly
assume that a reduction in their "city taxes" equals no increase in spending.
Early indications are that for budget year 2000 St. Anthony will be a prime example of
what the intent of the law is intended to accomplish. The information is as follows:
1999 Levy 2000 Levy Increase/(Decrease)
$1,616,147 $1,646,970 $ 30,823
Estimated
1999 Tax Rate 2000 Tax Rate
32.229% 30.358% (1.871%)
*Estimated by Hennepin County 9/7/99.
It is important to understand that because we are early in the Truth in Taxation process,
the year 2000 tax rate calculation is subject to change. The reason for the anticipated
reduction in St. Anthony's tax rate is a $300,000 increase in the City's Total Local Tax
Capacity.
Recommendation:
Council pass resolution XX-XXXX to comply with the new law (Minn. State 204b.135,
Subdivision 5) as amended by 1999 laws indicating its intention to increase the levy.
III. REVIEW 29TH AVENUE NE STREET AND
UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
•
' L
. ain thon
illa e
f
Administrative Offices
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699
(612) 789-8881 FAX (612) 781-9323
DKAFT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September , 1999
TO: Homeowners residing on 29' Avenue NE from
Stinson Boulevard to County Road 88
. FROM: Michael J. Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: YEAR 2000 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
This is invite you to the City Council's regular meeting of September 14, 1999.
At that meeting, the St. Anthony City Council is planning to consider a resolution
to accept the feasibility report and direct the engineer, WSB & Associates, Inc., to
prepare plans and specifications for the Year 2000 Street and Utility Improvement
project as regards 29`h Avenue NE. The meeting begins at 7:00 PM and will be
held in the Council Chambers of City Hall.
SEP-02-1999 08:33 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 6125411700 P.1
s BA.Mittelstad
350 Westwood Lake Office Bret A.Weis)
SUI Wayzata Boulevard Peter IL Willen ma,P.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55426 Donald W.Stcma,P.E.
Ronald B.Bray,P.E.
612-541-4800
&Associates, Inc. FAX 541-1700
Memorandum
To: Todd Hubmer,P.E. �
From: Chuck Rickart,P.E `�
/
Date: September 1, 1999
Re: 2911 Avenue NE Street Lighting
WSB Project No. 1465.35
As you requested, I have reviewed the options and costs associated with a potential street lighting
system on 296 Avenue from County Road 88 to Stinson Boulevard.
Options
Two options are available to the City for the construction of street lighting in this corridor.
Option 1:
This option would utilize Mn/DOT standard light poles,bases, and fixtures. This includes
metal poles 30-40 feet in height with an arched davit arm and a cobra head light. Typically, a
larger luminaire (400 watt)is used with this type of fixture and,therefore, fewer lighting
units would be required along the corridor. It is estimated that with this type of a fixture, 18
lighting units would be needed to light the entire corridor. The cost for this lighting system
would range from$25,000 to$35,000. The cost for a system of this type would be 100%
Municipal State Aid(MSA)eligible.
Option 2:
This option would use a decorative type lighting unit selected by the City. Typically,
decorative lighting has a lower mounting height(15-25 feet)and smaller luminaire(200
watt);therefore, more lighting installations would be required along the corridor. It is
estimated that up to 30 lighting units would be required for this corridor using a decorative
type light. The estimated cost for a decorative lighting system would range from$35,000 to
$50,000. The cost for a decorative lighting system can be paid for using MSA funds;
however,the difference in the standard lighting costs(Option 1)and the decorative lighting
costs (Option 2)would be paid for as a landscaping cost under MSA Rules. The City is
allotted up to 5% of their yearly state aid allocation for landscaping aspects of projects.
Based on the above options,the most economical option for the City would be to use the standard
Mn/DOT lighting units (Option 1),which are 100%MSA eligible. If the City would choose to use
decorative lighting(Option 2),the City's MSA landscaping budget would be impacted.
kd
Minneapolis - St . C I o u d
Infrashwcture Engineers Planners R-IWPWV1RI0UJ.A09o199.&WPd
TnTni 0 W)
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 99-044
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND
ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted March 23, 1999, a report was
prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc. with reference to the improvement of 29`h
Avenue NE, from Stinson Boulevard to County Road 88.
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost-effective, and feasible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
that:
1) The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the
report at an estimated total cost of the improvement of$2,630,000.00.
• 2
WSB & Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement.
They shall prepare plans for making such improvement.
Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
IV. REVIEW SANITARY SEWER STUDY.
B.A.Mittelm 3
350 Westwood Lake Office Bret A.W
8441 Wayzata Boulevard Peter R.Wdlenbnng, P.E.
AWS
AleMinneapolis, MN 55426 Donald W.Sterna,P.E.
. Ronald B.Bray,P.E.
612-541-4800
&Alssoctates,Inc. FAX 541-1700
Memorandum
To: City Council
City of St.Anthony
From: Charles Janski, P.E. 09,
Project Manager
Date: August 30, 1999
Re: Sanitary Sewer Study
WSB Project No. 1065.16
The City of St Anthony has two separate but related problems with the existing sanitary sewer
system. Infiltration/ Inflow (UI) generates very high flow rates and the high flows exceed the
. available capacity in the some of the existing sewer lines.
The attached Sanitary Sewer Study is the first step in addressing the Infiltration/Inflow and capacity
problems in the City's Sanitary Sewer System. Preparation of the document required review of
available background information including many historic studies, City construction record
drawings, and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) flow records, as well as
discussion with City operating staff and limited site visits.
The flow records were analyzed to quantify the I/I and determine the financial cost to the City. This
analysis suggests that in the two-year period of 1997 and 1998, the City of St Anthony paid
approximately$151,000 to the MCES for the I/I in the system. An aggressive VI reduction program
may remove a portion of this UI and provide measurable savings over a number of years.
The sanitary sewer system was analyzed using a computer model to evaluate the capacity available
in the existing pipe network. The model identified several areas that appear to have insufficient
capacity during extreme UI conditions. Many of these areas correspond to the areas that occasionally
have problems with sewer backups.
The background review and flow analyses suggest that private property connections are the primary
source of the remaining I/I in the system. The type of private property connections in the City of St
Anthony are not easily removed or corrected so it is anticipated that significant flow reduction will
take a number of years. Considering the delay in achieving flow reduction, some short-term
• improvements are suggested to reduce the potential for continued sewer backups.
Infrastructure Engineers Planners
F.•I WPW/M1065.761083099-cncL wpd
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
City Council
City of St.Anthony
August 30, 199
Page 2
The system improvements include: reconstruction of the Harding Street Lift Station and re-routing
of the forcemain from the lift station, diversion of the flow at St Anthony Road, construction of a
new line on Edward Street, enlarging the sewer main on Wilson Street and enlarging the main on
29`h Avenue to accept the flow diverted from the Old Hwy 8 line.
The UI reduction work should be focused on private property sources with an intensive education
program and financial incentives to solicit voluntary compliance with the City's Ordinance. The
voluntary program will probably need to be followed by a mandatory inspection and correction effort
to address all potential clear water n sources.
This report provides the basic information and suggestions for improving the St Anthony sanitary
sewer system. The next step is implementation of the proposed improvements and
recommendations. The suggested sewer system improvements should be considered for
incorporation into future street reconstruction efforts, and the flow and cost information should be
used to develop the public information program for flow reduction. It may take some time to realize
reductions in the M flow so it is important to continue the development of the education and flow
. reduction program. After review of this document we will be working with the City Staff to develop
the next phase of the UI reduction program.
nm
F.•1 W?W1M1065.161083099-cndwpd
V. DISCUSS 33RD AVENUE NE STREET AND
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS.
07/29/99 15:51 'x`612 935 8814 SEH.RCH ASSOC G
• 5
O O 10901 Red Circle Drive,Suite 200.P.O.Box 130,Minnetonka,MN 55343-0130 612.935.6901 612.935.8814 FAX
—7 architecture engineering environmental transportation
O
July 29, 1999 RE: Proposed Fees for Engineering Services
33rd Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation.and
Sidewalk Improvernents
Silver Lake Road to Stinson Boulevard
SEH No. P-SANT H9902.00
Mr. Jay Hartman
Public Works Director
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Take Road
St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699
Dear Mr.Hamman
We are pleased to provide the City of St.Anthony with the following proposal for engineering services for 3 3"
o Avenue from Silver Lake Road westerly to Stinson Boulevard. Our understanding of the scope of
improvements is the concrete rehabilitation on 33�Avenue, conerete sidewalk installation along north side,
decorative crosswalk placement similar to the easterly portion of 33rd Avenue,and construction during the year
2000. Based upon our understanding of the subject project, our proposed scope of services and fees are as
outlined below.
Item phase Fee
I Report $6,300
Tasks include preparation and presentation of a feasibility report describing existing
conditions,proposed improvements,estimated project costs,funding review,project
schedule and presentation to the City Council.
2 Design $43,500
Tasks include field survey,collection of on-site utility and signal data, survey of
existing pavement,prepare construction plans and project manual to State Aid
standards including plan and profile, details,cross sections,wall design quantity
tabulations,tacaffiic control plans,attendance at one neighborhood meeting,one City
Council meeting,coordination fnr acceptance of design with M IDOT State Aid
division and preparation of an opinion of probable cost.
3, Bidding $2,300
Tasks include assistance in securing a construction contract for the City by
distribution of bidding documents,answering pre-bid questions, attendance at bid
opening,preparation of a bid tabulation and making a recommendation to the City
���/// Council for the award of the const metion contract.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc, Offices located throughout the upper MldweSt Equal Opportunity Employer
We help you plan,design,and achieve.
07/29/99 15:52 V612 935 8814 SEH.RCH ASSOC
Mr. Jay Hartman
July 29, 1999
Page 2
Item Phase Fee
4. Construction $30,000
Tasks include preparation of contracts,Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed,
attendance at preconstruction meetings,fiilfillment of State Aid documentation during
construction, review of shop drawings, construction staking,coordination of on-site
testing,preparation of resident newsletters,processing payment applications,
providing 300 hours of construction on-site observations and project closeout.
The above fees plus reimbursable expenses for Items 1,2 and 3 are the not-to-exceed limits.The above fee for
Item No. 4 is an estimate based on our experience for construction administration, on site project inspection
plus reimbursable expenses and on-site testing required by a testing company.
Proposed Project Schedule
Order Project Feasibility Report September 14, 199
Neighborhood Informational Meeting October 28, 1999
Receive Project Feasibility Report/Order Plans and Specs Preparation November 9, 1999
Submit Plans for State Aid Review and Approval January 24,2000
. Approve Plans and Specs/Order Ad for Bids March 14, 2000
Receive Bids/Contract Award April 11, 2000
Neighborhood Project Initiation Meeting May 2000
Begin Construction May 2000
Construction Substantial Completion September 2000
Final Completion October 2000
If you have any questions regarding this information,please call us.
Thank you for giving SEH-RCM the opportunity to be of service to the City of St. Anthony.
Sincerely,
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
Richard C. Potz Michael P. Foertsch, P.E.
Project Manager Manager, Municipal Department
ka
c: Mike Morrison
a�czvII.waoposet,�nrrrA9az�,a
VI. REVIEW TAX LEVY AND BUDGET RESOLUTION
AND OTHER BUDGET ISSUES.
City Fund Balances
The audited Fund Balances for City operations at the end of 1998 totaled
$101573,683. A review of those funds and a description of their intended
use for budget year 1999 are listed below.
General Fund ($711,294)
The General Fund provides resources for financing general services and daily operations of
the City including Administration, Finance/Insurance, Police, Fire, Public Works and Parks
Maintenance.
The fund balance has been committed to support 1999 expenditures for:
1) $529,160 Working Capital
2) $ 13,500 Fire Department Budget Deficit
3) $ 5,000 VillageFest
4) $ 28,000 Unemployment Reserves
5) $ 93,263 Insurance Reserves
6) $ 6,758 MPRS Legal Reserves
7) $ 15,613 Schnitzer Legal Reserves
. 8) $ 20,000 Contract Insurance Deductibles
General Fund Reserves ($163,161 )
These reserves have been set aside to provide funding for unanticipated expenditures.
Accumulation of the reserves has taken place over several budgeting years and helps
provide the City with alternatives should an emergency arise.
Current allocation of the fund balance includes $150,000 for Budget Levy Reserves and
$13,161 non-designated reserves.
MSA Road Project Fund ($38,928)
This fund is restricted to provide funding for reconstruction or renovation/design of streets
and sidewalks that are designated as Minnesota State Aid Road Projects. Revenues are
derived from State Aid funding of the projects. The fund balance is used to fund start up
costs for future MSA projects and must be spent on the improvements of those roads.
Recycling U Beautification Fund ($60,490)
This fund is a restricted use fund that provides funding for recycling services and
beautification of the City boulevards. A portion of the Management Assistant's salary is
charged to this fund. Grants from Hennepin and Ramsey Counties provide the primary
funding for recycling. The fund is also committed as a revenue and expenditure source for
the City's annual Clean-up Day.
DARE Fund ($33,071 )
The DARE Fund is designated to provide funding for the education of youth and citizens of
the community about the use of illegal substances and drugs. Revenues are derived from
donations from private citizens, businesses and the I.S.D. ##282 DARE Levy. The fund
supports one-half of a police officer"s annual wages.
Crime Prevention Fund ($1,199)
The revenues of this Fund are derived from private donations. The funds are used for
educating the community about prevention of crime in their neighborhoods.
Capital Equipment Fund ($65,754)
The Capital Equipment Fund is used for major capital equipment purchases (refer to the 5-
Year Capital Equipment Plan, pages 120-124). Funding is derived from the $75,000
General Fund levy transfer, Lauderdale/Falcon Heights contract revenues and the trade and
sale of existing equipment.
Road Improvement Bond Fund ($625,224)
The Road Improvement Bond Fund is a restricted use fund, which is part of the City's on-
going road improvement projects plan. Road improvement bonds are issued to pay for the
initial project. Special assessments and a road improvement levy fund the re-payment of
the debt associated with the sale of these road improvement bonds.
. The debt issued to date totals $3,660,000. Year 2000 principal and interest payments
total $318,800. These funds can only be used for the payment and issuance costs of road
improvement bonds. They are non-transferable to other funds or projects.
Road Improvement Projects Fund ($86,704)
The Road Improvement Projects Fund is a fund specifically used for the reconstruction of
St. Anthony's streets and roads. Road improvement bond proceeds are the primary
funding source for this fund. Payments to contractors, engineers, consultants and all costs
associated with the restoration of a specific street project are made from this fund.
Revolving Fund ($1,118,230)
The Revolving Fund is the fund, which serves as general improvement fund. Each year the
City Council dedicates the use of this fund to various projects such as park improvements,
capital equipment purchases, computer technology, street improvements and contingencies
for emergency expenditures. Funding is primarily from the transfers of general fund
reserves generated from cost effective budgeting and controls. The fund balance
represents several budgeting years and has been dedicated as follows:
1) $ 50,931 Back-up Generator for Y2K Emergencies
2) $ 2,059 Park Improvements
3) $157,683 Purchase of new Fire Truck ($225,000)
4) $ 8,277 P/W Underground Storage Tank Removal
5) $100,000 Budget/LGA K HACA Reserves
. 6) $ 61,487 Public Works Maintenance Building
7) $100,143 Capital Equipment Contract Reserves
• (f
. 8) $ 17,857 Cable Reserves
9) $ 3,666 MIS/Computer Upgrades
10) $300,000 Water Tower Park Project
1 1) $175,000 Stormwater Renovations
12) $ 43,600 Y2K Upgrades
13) $ 58,500 Park System Renovations (Phase 1)
14) $ 25,000 Mill/Overlay Alley's
15) $ 14,000 City Hall Microphone System
Community Services/New City Hall Fund ($31,243)
The Community Services/New City Hall Fund is used to fund the operation and
maintenance of the new City Hall built in 1997. Funding is comprised of annual rent
charges of $100,000 to I.S.D. #282 for the Community Services portion of the building
and a rent transfer from the General Fund for the segment of the building used for City
Hall.
Tax Increment Bonds totaling $2,650,000 were issued to finance the Community Services
portion of the building. Annual principal and interest payments until the debt is paid off in
2010 are approximately $250,000 per year.
Water & Sewer Fund ($850,250)
The Water & Sewer Fund is an enterprise fund used to provide water and sewer services to
. the community. Funding for operation and maintenance of the system is provided on a
user-fee basis, which is based on consumption of water. In 1998, reserves from the Water
and Sewer Fund provided funding for the restoration of the Water Tower at 33rd and
Silver Lake Road. In addition, $100,000 has been dedicated to the watermain
improvements to the Silver Lake Road Bridge Project.
Stormwater Fund ($503,655)
The Stormwater Fund is a relatively new fund that has been developed in recent years to
provide funding for improvements to the City's stormwater system for 100-Year flood
protection. Funding comes from a variety of sources including, stormwater fees charged to
residential and commercial entities, State and County grants, transfers from other funds and
interest earnings.
Recent projects funded by the Stormwater Fund include the Silver Point Park Project and a
portion of the 1999 Street Improvement Bond that was issued for $425,000. It is
anticipated that the renovations and reconstruction of the City's stormwater system will
continue for the next several years.
Water Filtration & Purification Fund ($5,117,814)
The Water Filtration & Purification Fund was established and is dedicated to provide safe
drinking water to the residents. The monies in this fund were derived from a cash
settlement that the City received from the United States Army and Honeywell as damages
for contaminating the City's water supply.
1 �
Presently, the City is in year nine of a ten-year agreement that provides 90% funding for
operation and maintenance of the carbon filtration plant. Upon completion of the ten-year
agreement, the City will become 100% responsible for the operation and maintenance of
the plant.
The present financial plan in place is to use the annual interest earnings from the money to
fund yearly operation and maintenance costs. Since, the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency has indicated that contaminates in the water could be in the system for as much as
100 years, long range financial plans and how these funds can best be used will occur over
the next several years.
Liauor Fund ($916,686)
The Liquor Fund is an enterprise fund used to account for operations from the City's
municipal liquor stores. Profits from operations are directed to capital equipment purchases
and park improvements.
The majority part of the fund balance is inventory and reserves to support the $940,000
Liquor Revenue Bonds issued in 1997 to build a new off-sale liquor store on Silver Lake
Road. Annual debt payments through 2012 total $95,000 per year.
Severance Fund ($250,007)
The Severance Fund is a resticted use fund that provides funding for employee vacation,
sick leave and comp-time severance pay upon their termination of employment with the
City.
The City's year-end liability for 1998 totaled $321,120. Since it is highly unlikely that all
employees would leave the City at the same time, the City Council has capped this funding
at $250,000
11
CITY OF ST ANTHONY
RESOLUTION #99-XXX
A RESOLUTION SETTING THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PROPOSED 2000 TAX LEVY
AND BUDGET IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRUTH IN TAXATION ACT
WHEREAS, the Truth in Taxation Law requires that the City of St. Anthony provide
Hennepin and Ramsey Counties with a proposed certified 2000 tax levy
and budget; and
WHEREAS, the information required for the City Council to make a definitive tax levy
cannot be determined until the City of St. Anthony holds its public hearings;
and
WHEREAS, the furnishing of this proposed tax levy and budget is made contingent upon any
revisions being allowed if the current law is modified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1) The collectible 2000 proposed property tax levy is:
Property Tax Levy $1,996,178
Less: H.A.C.A. ( 349,208)
Proposed General Fund Levy $1,646,970
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Levy $ 20,000
Less: H.A.C.A. ( 4,597)
Proposed Housing and Redevelopment Authority Levy $ 15,403
Special Assessment/Road Improvements $ 238,142
Total 2000 Proposed Tax Levy $1,900,515
2) The 2000 General Fund Proposed Budget totals $3,527,450
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that:
1) The hearing date for discussion of the 2000 proposed levy and budget is set at
November 30, 1999, 7:00 P.M. in its Council Chambers and if necessary be
reconvened on December 14, 1999, 7:00 P.M. in its Council Chambers.
. 2) The subsequent hearing date to adopt the City's final property tax levy and budget
shall be announced prior to completion of its November 30, 1999 hearing, or if
necessary, prior to its completion of the December 14, 1999 reconvened hearing.
Adopted this day of , 1999
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
13
Cithy o St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418-1699
612-789-8881
Fax: 612-781-9323
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
Date: August 25, 1999
To: Bulletin
Fax:
Sender: Connie Kroeplin
YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 1 PAGES, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT
RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 612-789-8881.
• Please publish the following Notice of Hearing:
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING
TAX RATE INCREASE AUTHORIZATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the St. Anthony City Council will hold a public hearing on
Tuesday, September 14, 1999 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible to consider a
resolution which will authorize a property tax increase. This public hearing is required for cities
with populations over 500. The public hearing and passage of the resolution will be held
concurrently with the adoption of the preliminary levy for the City of St. Anthony.
Michael J. Mornson
City Manager
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
September 1, 1999
•
VII. REVIEW HENNEPIN COUNTY ROAD
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION.
i L-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 26, 1999
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Jay Hartman, Director of Public Works
ITEM: 2000/2001 County Road Maintenance Agreement No. PW47-10-99
The 2000/2001 County Road Maintenance Agreement contract between the City of St.
Anthony and Hennepin County has been submitted for your approval. The contract
price agreement will remain the same for the year 2000, but will be increased by 3% in
. the year 2001.
I recommend approval of the agreement. Please let me know if you have any questions
concerning this agreement.
15
. Contract no. 5022M9
Agreement No. PW 47-10-99
City of St. Anthony
County of Hennepin
COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT,Made and entered into this day of ' 1999
by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State
of Minnesota,hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of St. Anthony, a body politic
and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH;
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1, and 471.59,
the parties desire to enter into an agreement relating to the maintenance of County State Aid
Highways within and adjacent to the corporate limits of the City upon the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE,The parties do agree as follows:
I
The City will, during the term of this Agreement, maintain as hereinafter provided, those
portions of County State Aid Highways within and adjacent to the corporate limits of the City
listed as follows:
Mileage
Centerline Lane
CSAH 27 -between St. Anthony Boulevard and 37th Ave. N.E. 1.16 4.64
CSAH 136 -between CSAR 153 and 37th Avenue N.E. 1.25 3.82
CSAR 153 - between Stinson Boulevard and CSAH 136 0.53 2.12
2.94 10.58
CSAH 88 - between St. Anthony Blvd. and East County Line 0.70 2.80
II
The maintenance to be performed by the City on CSAH's 27, 136 and 153, shall consist of
the following:
A) Keep the aforementioned County State Aid Highways from curb to curb reasonably
. free and clear of ice and snow, and undertake proper sanding or salting when
necessary.
-1AD-
-
1 (o
. Contract No. 5022M9
Agreement No. PW 47-10-99
B) Sweep, flush, and dispose of any debris from the aforementioned County State Aid
Highways during the calendar year as follows:
a. As soon as practicable after the spring snow melt,
b. Late spring period,
c. Mid-summer period, and
d. Late fall period.
C) Clean the center medians in conjunction with the spring cleanings described in
Paragraph "B".
The maintenance to be performed by the City on CSAH 88 shall consist of the following:
A) Mow the grassed areas of the aforementioned County State Aid Highway ten times
per year except for the deep ditches on the east side.
B) Sweep, flush, and dispose of any debris from the aforementioned County State Aid
Highways during the calendar year as follows:
a. As soon as practicable after the spring snow melt,
b. Late fall period.
. c. Plus up to two additional sweepings as necessary.
Hennepin County will provide arrowboard pickup with operator as needed. Contact
Brian Langseth (District Supervisor) at 745-7706 for scheduling.
C) Clean the center medians in conjunction with the spring cleanings described in
Paragraph "B".
The City will furnish all labor, equipment, materials, supplies, tools, and other items
necessary for the performance of all and any of the work provided for in this Agreement.
III
The County will pay the City for maintenance operations as specified herein for Calendar
Years 2000 and 2001, the amounts set forth in the fee schedule as follows:
2000 FEE SCHEDULE
Item Unit of Measure Quanti Unit Price Total Fee
Snow and Ice Control Lump Sum 1 $6,607.50(A) $6,607.50
Sweeping and Cleaning Sweepings 4(B) 687.50 2,750.00
Center Median Cleaning Lump Sum 1 200.00 200.00
Mowing Mowings 10 100.00 1.000.00
. TOTAL HENNEPIN COUNTY FEE $10,557.50
-2- t
l ^7
. Contract No. 5022M9
Agreement No. PW 47-10-99
2001 FEE SCHEDULE
Item Unit of Measure Quanti Unit Price Total Fee
Snow and Ice Control Lump Sum 1 $6,924.23(A) $6,924.23
Sweeping and Cleaning Sweepings 4(B) 687.50 2,750.00
Center Median Cleaning Lump Sum 1 200.00 200.00
Mowing Mowings 10 100.00 1,000.00
TOTAL HENNEPIN COUNTY FEE $10,874.23
A. If any of the highways or portions thereof covered by this Agreement are removed from the
County system during the term of this Agreement as provided by law, the County's annual
fee for snow and ice control shall be recomputed as follows:
Yearly Snow/Ice Control Fee x A x B = Total annual Fee for Snow
2.94 5 and Ice Control;
Where: A. =Number of miles removed from County System.
B. =Number of winter months the mileage removal was in effect. (For the
purpose of this computation, winter months shall be construed to be the
period from January 1 to April 15 and from November 15 to December 31
of each calendar year giving a yearly total of five months.)
B. Estimated quantity consists of four sweepings as per Article II of this Agreement. The
County shall pay$687.50 for each time the sweeping and cleaning operation is performed.
Payments under this Agreement shall be made on a semi-annual basis, and as soon after
the respective dates of April 30 and December 31 of each year as may be possible, upon
submission by the City to the County of a certificate approved by the County Department of
Public Works certifying that all work has been done during the period for which payment is to be
made, in full accordance with this Agreement.
This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for period January 1, 2000 through
December 31, 2001.
IV
It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by
the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided herein to be performed
by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may
. or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of
the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims
-3-
1g
Contract No. 5022M9
Agreement No. PW 47-10-99
made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees
while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way
be the obligation or responsibility of the County.
Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in
the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the
County shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or
might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of
the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims
made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees
while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way
be the obligation or responsibility of the City.
V
If the City fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer
the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement,this shall constitute a default. Unless
the City's default is excused by Hennepin County, Hennepin County may upon written notice
immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety.
Hennepin County's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise
any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same,
unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or
relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement.
VI
Upon failure of the City to perform any of the work named herein under the terms of this
Agreement, Hennepin County may do and perform such work or cause it to be done and
performed, and may retain from any monies then due to the City under this Agreement, or
thereafter becoming due, any such amount as is required for the completion of such work,
provided however, that this paragraph shall not be construed to relinquish any right of action
which may accrue in behalf of the County as against the City for any breach of Agreement.
VII
The City shall not assign, subcontract, transfer, or pledge this contract and/or the services
to be performed hereunder without prior approval from Hennepin County.
VIII
• It is understood that all persons working on such highways are employees of the City or its
-4- a
. Contract No. 5022M9
Agreement No. PW 47-10-99
contractors or agents and are in no way employed by the County,provided, however, that this
provision shall not apply to persons employed directly by the County, or by contractors other
than the City, engaged by the County. All contracts and agreements made by the City with third
parties for the performance of any work to be done under this Agreement shall be subject to the
terms of this Agreement and comply with all state laws and requirements relating to contracts for
the construction and maintenance of County State Aid Highways and that a clause to that effect
shall be inserted in all such Agreements.
The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County, its elected officials,
officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action,judgments,
damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, resulting directly or
indirectly from any act or omission of the City, its subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly
employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for in the
performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss by reason of the
failure of said City to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement.
The City also agrees that any contract let by the City for the performance of any of the
work included hereunder shall include clauses that will: 1) Require the contractor to indemnify
. and hold the County, its commissioners, officers, agents and employees harmless from any
liability, claim, demand,judgments, expenses, action or cause of action of any kind or character
arising out acts or omissions of said contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors
and 2) Require the contractor to provide and maintain sufficient insurance so as to assure the
performance of its hold harmless obligations.
IX
The provisions of Minnesota Statute 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating
to Civil Rights and discrimination and the affirmative action policy statement of Hennepin
County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
X
The parties hereto agree that either party, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized
representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably
deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any
books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and
procedures of the parties and involve transactions relating to this Agreement.
XI
It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained
herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the
-5- L 7
. 20
. Contract No. 5022M9
Agreement No. PW 47-10-99
parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are
incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement.
Any alternations,variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement
shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement
signed by the parties hereto.
(This space intentionally left blank)
-6-
Contract No. 5022M9
. Agreement No. PW 47-10-99
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
(SEAL) By:
Mayor
Date:
And:
City Manager
Date:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
ATTEST:
. By: By:
Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: And:
Assistant/Deputy/County Administrator
By: Date:
Assistant County Attorney
Date: And:
Assistant County Administrator, Public Works
and County Engineer
Date:
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
By: By:
Assistant County Attorney Director,Transportation Department
Date: Date:
•
-7- �.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 99-HCROADMAINT
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN HENNEPIN COUNTY
AND THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign the Agreement
between Hennepin County and the City of St. Anthony for road maintenance services on behalf
of the City of St. Anthony.
Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution
presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota, on the
day of , 1999, as disclosed by the records of said City Council in my possession.
City Clerk
40
VIII. REVIEW METRO TRANSIT AGREEMENT
RESOLUTION.
•
•
23
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 26, 1999
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Jay Hartman, Director of Public Works
ITEM: Metro Transit Sign Replacement Program
Metro Transit is requesting that the City participate in a bus stop sign installation,
replacement and maintenance program. Metro Transit does not have a sign crew to
install or maintain the bus stop signs.
For your consideration attached is a Joint Powers Agreement along with a fee schedule
and contract amount the City will be reimbursed for providing this service.
I would recommend the approval of this agreement. Please let me know if you have
any questions.
•
MetroTransit
•
August 18, 1999
Mr. Jay Hartman
City of St. Anthony
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Dear Mr. Hartman,
Metro Transit is requesting that the City of St. Anthony participate in a bus stop sign
installation, replacement and maintenance program. I have contacted cities, served by
Metro Transit, and breifly explained the features of the requested program. For your
review and your City's review, I have attached the following documents:
A Joint Powers Agreement between the Metropolitan Council and the City of St.
Anthony (2 copies)
A Field List for example only. At time of construction a district supervisor will
work with your crew and supply them with a completed field list as to the exact location
of each bus stop sign.
Metro Transit has no sign crew to install, replace or maintain bus stop signs. The
attached Joint Powers Agreement sets forth the terms and reimbursement of a bus stop
sign installation, replacement and maintenance program that would be performed by the
City and reimbursed by Metro Transit(Metropolitan Council). Key provisions of the
agreement are listed below:
1. The Joint Powers Agreement- sets forth terms and conditions of the work
2. Exhibit A - lists each sign location and specifies the sign replacement
conditions
3. Exhibit B - summarizes the total number of signs estimating the quantities
required
4. Exhibit C - calculates the estimated value of the contract, subject to actual field
conditions
5. Exhibit D - a form the city would use to obtain reimbursement from the
Metropolitan Council
6. Exhibit E-Federal lobbying restriction due to funding source
Note that the final reimbursement is determined by the actual work required and the
quantities used are simply an estimate based on replacement experience. Also note that
any maintenance required is reimbursed on a labor, equipment and material basis. There
is not an absolute schedule for this project, but we do want to get most of the signs
. installed as soon as possible. W,; mderstand that your efficiency in installation is a
function of the time frame avail, le and we plan to be as flexible as possible.
A service of the Metropolitan Council
560 Sixth Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411-4398 (612)349-7400 Transit Info 373-3333 TTY 341-0140
http//wwwmetrotransit.org An Equal Opportunity Employer
257
• If you review the attached douments and have questions or if you want to meet with me
or a representative form Metro Transit, please contact me at(612) 349-7678, FAX (612)
349-7548.
Sincerely,
I�Cwl
Tracey Jackson
Public Facilities Administrator
z�
. Council Contract No. 98-015-72
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND
THE CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
FOR INSTALLATION,REPLACEMENT,AND
MAINTENANCE OF BUS STOP SIGNAGE
THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of , 19 , between the
Metropolitan Council("the Council"), a Minnesota political subdivision, and the City of St. Anthony
("the City"), a Minnesota municipal corporation.
WHEREAS,the Council is authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 473.405 to construct, equip,and
operate transit and paratransit systems in the seven-county metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, the Council has begun Capital Improvement Project Number 3291, for providing new bus
stop signs at all its bus stops,and route number and destination holders at selected bus stops; and
WHEREAS, new and existing bus stop signs and related signs require ongoing maintenance and
replacement,and Council route changes may necessitate moving the location of bus stops and bus zones;
. and
WHEREAS,the City possesses the authority, skill,and expertise to install, remove, maintain,and
retrofit traffic signs and sign-mounting structures within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS,the Council and the City desire jointly and cooperatively to provide for installation,
replacement, and maintenance of signage, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 471.59,to serve the
needs of residents and visitors who use transit.
NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained in this agreement,the parties
agree as follows:
I. DEFINITIONS
1.01 Circle-T Signs. "Circle-T Signs"means the old bus stop signs removed by the City,
bearing the logo of a white"T"within a white circle on a red background.
1.02 Holders. "Holders"mean units for displaying route number, destination and other
transit service information at bus stops.
1.03 Holder Components. "Holder Components"means the holder units; mounting screws,
nuts,washers,and bearing plates; and tamperproof clamps and screws with necessary keying tools.
1.04 Sign Components. "Sign Components"means the new bus stop signs and nylon
washers.
-- 1 --
z -7
. H. LOCATION OF BUS STOPS
2.01 Council Selection. The Council is responsible for selecting locations for bus stops and
bus stop signage, and for providing the criteria for placement of bus stop signage. The Council will
notify the City of the locations selected by the Council for bus stops and bus stop signage. If the City has
concerns regarding a proposed location,the City will notify the Council in writing within ninety(90)
days of the City's receipt of Council notice of the proposed location. The Council will consider the
City's input in making the final determination whether to implement the proposed location.
2.02 Access for People with Disabilities. The City and the Council will coordinate and
consult regarding development of a plan for providing access to new bus stops in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the regulations implementing
the Act at 49 C.F.R. part 37,Appendix A, section 10.2.
M. INSTALLATION OF NEW BUS STOP SIGNS; CAPITAL EMPROVEMENT PROJECT
3.01 Location Lists. With this agreement, the Council shall provide to the City a preliminary
bus stops list designating locations at which bus stop signage is required and designating the locations at
which Holders will be installed. Prior to commencement of the work, the Council will provide to the
City a detailed,updated bus stop sign inventory with specific information on the signage required at each
bus stop location. A sample inventory is attached to this agreement as Exhibit A.
3.02 Delivery of Bus Stop Signs and Holders. The Council will furnish to the City Sign
. Components, consisting of bus stop signs and nylon washers for protecting the reflective front face of the
bus stop signs, to be used by the City for installation of the signs. The Council will furnish to the City
Holder Components,consisting of complete holder units and mounting screws, nuts,washers, and
bearing plates; and tamperproof clamps for pipe installations and tamperproof screws for channel
installations, including necessary keying tools. The Council will provide the City with a schedule for
delivery of Sign and Holder Components. The Council will deliver Sign and Holder Components in
substantial cartons with each sign and Holder protected to minimize the possibility of damage. The City
shall notify the Council of signs or Holders found to be defective within a reasonable time after receipt of
a delivery. The Council shall replace quantities of defective Sign or Holder Components to the extent
permitted by its reserve supply. The City shall not install defective Sign or Holder Components.
3.03 Storage and Handling of Bus Stop Signs and Holders. The City shall inventory the
Sign and Holder Components received and maintain the inventory showing Components installed and in
storage. The City shall use due care in handling the Components and shall store the Components in a
secure and dry location, stacking them on pallets or using other storage means that provide for air
circulation between the floor surface and the cartons. The City shall not store the signs or Holders
stacked flat. The City is responsible for loss of or damage to the Sign and Holder Components while in
the City's storage. The City shall not install damaged Sign or Holder Components.
3.04 Installation. The City shall be responsible for all work related to installing bus stop
signs and Holders at locations in the City as designated by the Council in the bus stops list or bus stop
sign inventory. This includes removal, recycling or disposing of materials, and repairs where necessary.
The City shall provide all equipment,tools,and supplies necessary for installation, other than the Sign
. and Holder Components provided by the Council. The City shall be responsible for placement of the
signs at the bus stops in a manner in compliance with the sign placement criteria furnished to the City by
the Council. All hardware and other materials furnished and installed by the City shall be corrosion
resistant, for exterior use, and of a quality at least equal to those used by the City for similar work. All
hardware and other materials furnished and installed by the City shall be new and free from defects upon
--2--
. completion of the work. The City shall use the nylon protective washers furnished by the Council under
the City's own metal washers used in mounting the bus stop signs. The City shall install the protective
nylon washers directly against the reflective sheeting of the front face of the bus stop signs. The City
shall be responsible for recycling existing Circle-T Signs removed under this agreement.
3.05 Holder Installation. In installing Holders,the City shall use either Council-famished
safety,tamper-proof hardware, or tamper-proof hardware selected by and acquired at the City's own
expense. The City shall install Holders in a manner so as to maximize pedestrian safety and minimize
vulnerability to vandalism. The City shall perform the installation of each Holder by(1)removing the
top(or bottom)end cap and glass window,(2)mounting the Holder to the sign-mounting structure
approximately 5 feet, 10 inches(70 inches)from grade to the top of the Holder, and(3)replacing the
glass window and refastening the top(or bottom) end cap to the Holder body.
The City shall mount the Holder as labeled: "INSTALL HOLDER THIS END UP"to help insure that
the bottom end cap(with its pre-fitted neoprene setting blocks for receiving the glass window) is at the
bottom of the installed Holder. The Council shall be responsible for the installation of its own
informational inserts in the Holder.
IV. COMPENSATION FOR CAPITAL IlAPROVEMENT PROJECT
4.01 Initial Worksheet and Proposal Sheet. The Council has prepared an initial Worksheet
and an initial Proposal Sheet for the City's work related to Capital Improvement Project Number 3291.
The initial Worksheet and the initial Proposal Sheet are attached to and incorporated in this agreement as
Exhibit B and Exhibit C, respectively. The initial Worksheet and the initial Proposal Sheet display initial
database quantities, application factors,projected quantities,and proposed compensation for the work to
be performed.
4.02 Payment. The Council shall reimburse the City based on unit prices per task multiplied
by quantities of tasks performed.
4.03 Compensation. The Council's estimate of reimbursement to the City is shown on the
initial Proposal Sheet(Exhibit C).
a. Quantities entered on Exhibit C are from March 1995 or a more current update of the
Council's Allstops database.
b. Unit costs entered on Exhibit C are the Council's estimate of fair and equitable
compensation for the work to be performed.
4.04 Invoice Requirements. Progress payments and cumulative total compensation to the
City shall be in accordance with an approved Cost Tabulation Sheet in the format in Exhibit D attached
to and incorporated in this agreement. The Cost Tabulation Sheet shall be completed by the City and
submitted to the Council for payment as follows:
a. Quantities entered on the Cost Tabulation Sheet shall be invoice quantities of actual
work performed.
b. Quantities entered on the Cost Tabulation Sheet shall not exceed quantities shown on
Exhibit C unless so amended by prior written notification and mutual acceptance by
authorized representatives of the Council and the City.
--3 --
z �
. C. Unit costs entered on the Cost Tabulation Sheet shall be identical to the unit costs shown
on Exhibit C unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of the
Council.
d. Payment under this agreement is subject to the following requirements:
(i) Billings shall be submitted not more frequently than once per month. However,
the Council encourages the City to submit one billing upon completion of the
work or progress billings at regular semi-annual or quarterly intervals.
(ii) Invoices must include the Council contract number.
V. ROUTINE REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING BUS STOP
SIGNAGE
5.01 Services. The City shall be responsible for installing, maintaining, relocating,and
moving existing bus stop signs and new bus stop signs installed after the date of this agreement at bus
stop locations designated by the Council. The Council shall provide the signs. The City shall supply the
signposts,hardware, and labor and equipment required for routine replacement and maintenance of bus
stop signs.
5.02 Compensation. The Council will reimburse the City for the reasonable costs incurred in
connection with routine maintenance and replacement of signs. The City shall submit invoices to the
Council not more frequently than once per month for the City's routine bus stop sign replacement and
maintenance activities. Each invoice must contain the Council contract number and be supplemented by
an accompanying and separate detailed description of the work involved; the labor and equipment used
in the performance of the work; and the parts and materials furnished by the City.
VI. TERM AND TERNIINATION OF AGREEMENT
6.01 Term. This agreement shall commence on the date of execution of this agreement and
shall continue in force and effect until terminated in accordance with paragraph 6.02.
6.02 Termination of Agreement. Once the City has completed its responsibilities for
Capital Improvement Project number 3291,or if the Council notifies the City that funds for Capital
Improvement Project Number 3291 have been depleted or withdrawn,the portions of this agreement
providing for the performance of and payment for work for Capital Improvement Project number 3291
shall terminate. This agreement may also be terminated by either party without cause upon sixty(60)
days' written notice to the other party.
VII. ACCOUNTING,RECORD,AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
7.01 Separate Accounts. The City agrees to establish and maintain separate accounts for the
work undertaken pursuant to article III and article V. The City will maintain accurate and complete
records and accounts relating to the receipt and expenditure of any and all funds paid by the Council
. under this agreement. The City must maintain adequate records to document all invoices submitted to
the Council. All accounts and records shall be kept and maintained for a period of at least six(6)years
following the termination of this agreement.
—4--
3v
. 7.02 Audit. As required by Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, subd. 5,the records,books,
documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City and of any subcontractor relating to
work performed pursuant to this agreement shall be subject to audit and examination by Council and the
Legislative Auditor and State Auditor. The City shall permit the Council or its designee to inspect and
copy all accounts, records and business documents, including those of any subcontractor,at any time
during regular business hours as necessary to audit this agreement. Within thirty(30) days after
completion,the City shall deliver to the Council a copy of any financial or operational audit of the work
performed by the City done by the City or at its request or at the direction of any governmental agency or
department. The Council shall have the right in its discretion to monitor, examine, and investigate all
elements of the work performed pursuant to this agreement.
VIII. GENERAL PROVISIONS
8.01 Amendments. The terms of this agreement may be changed by mutual agreement of the
parties. Changes shall be effective only upon execution of written amendment(s)signed by authorized
representatives of the Council and the City.
8.02 Compliance with Law. In performing the work provided for in this agreement,the City
agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. In particular,the City will be
responsible for performing installation of bus stop signs and holders in compliance with the applicable
provisions of:
a. MINNESOTA MANUAL FOR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR
. STREETS AND HIGHWAYS,current edition and as amended.
b. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, current edition and as amended.
C. MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 216D regarding excavation, location of
underground facilities, notification of Gopher State One Calling System and precautions
to avoid damage.
Specific provisions in this article include, in part, certain standard terms and conditions required by the
Department of Transportation("DOT"),whether or not expressly set forth in the preceding provisions.
All contractual provisions required by DOT to be passed to the City, as set forth in FTA Circular
4220.ID,dated April 15, 1996, are hereby incorporated by reference. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this agreement, all Federal Transit Administration ("FTA")mandated terms shall be deemed
to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this agreement. The City shall not
perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any Council requests which would
cause the Council to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions. However, no reference to DOT or
FTA shall be construed to make DOT or FTA a party to this agreement.
8.03 Project Management Responsibility. The City shall be responsible to furnish or
secure, administer, and manage all labor, material, equipment and support for the accomplishment of the
work, except as expressly stipulated to be furnished by or as the responsibility of the Council. Under the
terms of this agreement,the City has and retains full control and supervision of the services and full
. control over the employment, direct compensation and discharge of all persons assisting in the
performance of its services under this agreement. The City agrees to be solely responsible for all matters
relating to payment of employees, including compliance with social security, payroll taxes and
withholdings,unemployment compensation, and all other regulations governing such matters. The City
agrees that any and all of its employees and all other persons employed by it in the performance of any
--5--
' 31
. work or services required or provided under this agreement,shall not be considered employees of the
Council and that any and all claims that may arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of Minnesota
on behalf of said employees while so engaged,and any and all claims made by any third parties as a '
consequence of any act or omission on the part of the City's or any subcontractor's employees or other
persons while so engaged on any of the work or services to be rendered shall not be the obligation or
responsibility of the Council.
8.04 Contact Persons. Upon entering this agreement,the Council and the City will each
notify the other of the name(s) and telephone number(s)of contact persons for their respective duties
under this agreement. The Council and the City shall each notify the other as soon as possible of any
changes in the contact persons. If there are no changes in contact persons,by January 1 of each year this
agreement is in effect,the City and the Council will confirm to the other that the information regarding
the identified contact person remains valid.
8.05 Liability. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results
thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the
results thereof. The City's and the Council's liability shall be governed by the Minnesota Municipal Tort
Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, and other applicable law.
8.06 No Waiver. Nothing in this agreement shall be interpreted as a waiver or release of
either the Council's or the City's authority under Minnesota Statutes section 473.411, subdivision 5,
pertaining to Council use of highways and other public roadways and roadway appurtenances. The
Council reserves its rights to have Council staff or contractors install temporary or permanent signs
. where necessitated by route changes or weather detours, or as required to conduct its public transit and
paratransit operations.
8.07 Equal Employment Opportunity;Non-Discrimination. In conjunction with the
execution of its obligations,the City agrees that it and any subcontractors shall not discriminate against
any employee or applicant for employment because of race,color,creed, religion,natural origin, sex,
sexual orientation,marital status, status with regard to public assistance,disability, age, membership or
activity in a local civil rights commission, or political affiliation, and shall take affirmative actions to
ensure applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race,
color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public
assistance, disability, age,membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, or political
affiliation, in all matters, including employment, upgrading,demotion, or transfer, recruitment or
recruitment advertising; layoff, return from layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of
compensation; and selection for training or apprenticeship.
The City agrees that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352) and all
requirements imposed by the U.S.Department of Transportation,to the end that, in accordance with Title
VI of the Act, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race,color, sex or national origin,be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity funded by this agreement.
The City further agrees that it, and any subcontractors under this agreement, shall not discriminate
against any qualified disabled person who is an employee or applicant for employment and shall take
. affirmative action to ensure that such qualified individuals are treated without regard to their disability in
regard to job application procedures; hiring, advancement or discharge of employees; compensation;job
training; and other terms,conditions, and privileges of employment, pursuant to the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
—6—
32
. In addition,the City agrees to abide by the requirements of 49 C.F.R. Part 23,regarding minority
(disadvantaged)business enterprises in DOT programs. Failure to carry out the requirements set forth in
49 C.F.R. section 23.43(a)shall constitute a breach of this agreement and, after the notification of the
DOT, may result in termination of this agreement by the Council or such remedy as the Council deems
appropriate.
8.08 Permits,Bonds,and Approvals. The City is responsible for obtaining all applicable local
and state licenses, permits, bonds,and authorizations necessary for performing the work in this
agreement.
8.09 Federal Requirements. The City acknowledges that this agreement is subject to FTA
requirements for third party procurement. The City acknowledges that, if the City subcontracts the work
provided for in this agreement, the City will conduct any subcontractor solicitation and require
performance of subcontracted portions of this agreement in compliance with applicable FTA
requirements, including requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act,the Seismic Safety requirements of 42
U.S.C. §7701,the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, and the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act.
The City shall seek assistance from the Council in determining the applicability of these Federal
requirements for any subcontracted work to be done under this agreement.
8.10 Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension,Ineligibility,and Voluntary
Exclusion. If this agreement is in a total amount exceeding$100,000.00, by signing this agreement,the
City certifies that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment,
declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from participation in this agreement by any Federal
department or agency. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which the Council
relies in entering this agreement. If it is later determined that the City knowingly rendered an erroneous
certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government,the department or
agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension
and/or debarment. The City shall provide to the Council immediate written notice if at any time the City
learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed
circumstances. The City further certifies that it will comply with the requirements of 49 C.F.R. section
29.510 and obtain the required certifications before entering into any subcontracts over$100,000 using
funds provided through this agreement,and submit copies of the subcontractors' certifications to the
Council.
8.11 Certification of Restrictions on Lobbying; Disclosure. If this agreement is in a total
amount exceeding$100,000, the City certifies that no federal appropriated funds have been paid or will
be paid by or on behalf of the City for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any federal agency, a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a
member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract,the making of any federal
grant, the making of any federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement,and the extension,
continuation,renewal, amendment,or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan,or cooperative
agreement. A certification of this compliance is attached to and made a part of this agreement as Exhibit
E. The City further certifies that, if any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or
will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
federal agency, a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member
of Congress in connection with the projects funded by the funds allocated to the City in this agreement,
the City shall complete and submit to the Council, Standard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
The City certifies that it will require the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for any subcontracts in excess of$100,000.00 under this agreement,and that all
--7--
33
. subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly to the City. The certifications referred to in this
article and attached and made a part of this agreement are material representations of fact upon which the
Council relies when this agreement is made.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly-
authorized representatives.
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
By
Its
Date
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Approved as to form:
By
James J. Solem, Regional Administrator
. Lynn M. Belgea
Associate General Counsel Date
—8--
34-
8/18/99
48/18/99 8:36 Ann PROPOSAL Pagel
. 34 MC SIGN YES EXHIBIT B "Anthodn
92 MC SIGN NONE TOTAL RECORDS =
126 check sum with total records
1.00 accuracy factor
I
MC SIGN YES U-post O-pipe Light Power Signal 14Q&Other
FRONT . ' . Q 4 0 0 - 1 41
%factors= 0.981 0.00 0.02 combined 1.28
s_.. BACK
- - BOTH
734
OTHER
TOTAL PLUS"BOTH" 0 = RETROFITS 34
92 MC SIGN NONE
AVAILABLE STRUCTURES
YES, CITY FRONT NO PRKG 10
82 (x % li ht power signal other) 0.02 21 1 LEE
TOTAL NEW SIGNS ON EXISTING STRUCTURES 12
i I
. NO AVAILABLE STRUCTURES
82 (x% U's x% concrete) 0.98 0.22 (CONCRETE) U-POSTS 18
82 (x % U's x% non-concrete) 0.981 0.78 (NON-CONCRETE) U-POSTS 62
82 (x % O's x%concrete) 0.00 0.22 (CONCRETE) O-PIPES 0
82 (x% O's x% non-concrete) 0.00 0.78 (NON-CONCRETE) O-PIPES 0
1.00
calculations for"NO AVAILABLE STRUCTURES"
NO, CITY FRONT NO PRKG %factors=
BUS STOP SURFACE
concretel 0.22
bituminous
gravel ?
sodded
unimproved M ORM
other _`-
nonZoncrete 97 0.78
125 1.00
"calculations" accuracy range of: 0 82 125 TOTAL MC SIGNS i 126
minus"BOTH", above (0)
TOTAL STOPS 126
Interagency Agreement, Capital EXHIBIT B
' � S
8/18/99 8:36 Ann PROPOSAL Pagel
. F7Metro Transit Contract No. 98-015-72 EXHIBIT C
with the City of St.Anthony
Quantity UNIT
NO. DESCRIPTION Estimating QTY. PRICE TOTALS
Factor
1.0 RETROFIT/INSTALL: NEW SIGN ON EXISTING SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE.
1.11 Retrofit existing sign with new sign. 34 x $20 = 680
1.21 Install new sign on existing structure. 12 x $20 = 240
1.2.1 Lengthen existing pipe or post. 50% of 1.2 6 x $20 = 120
1.3 Install holder. x $30 = 0
1.4 Special 1.4: x = 0
1.0 Sub-total = $1,040
2.0 REMOVE: EXISTING STRUCTURE WHERE EXISTING BUS SIGN 8 STOP ARE VACATED/RELOCATED.
2.1 Remove and patch, soil/blacktop. 50% of 1.1 2 x $201 = I 34
2.2 Remove and patch, concrete. 50% of 1.1 21 x $201 = 1 34
2.0 Sub-total = $68
3.0 INSTALL: NEW SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND SIGN.
3.1 U-post concrete). 18 x $80 = 1,434
3.2 U-post(non-concrete). 62 x $70 = 4,346
3.3 Round pipe (concrete). I 0 x $100 = 0
3.4 Round pipe (non-concrete). 0 x $120 = 0
. � 13.0 Sub-total = $5,779
I
4.0 OTHER.
4.1 Special 4.1: 1XI 0
4.2 Special 4.2: 1 1XI 0
4.0 Sub-total = $0
GRAND TOTAL = $6,887
Contingency: 10% NOT TO EXCEED = $7,576
CHECK HERE TO SELECT(unit prices) PAYMENT OPTION NO, 'I
CHECK HERE TO SELECT(time & material) PAYMENT OPTION NO, 2
Estimated %of work by City's own resources. %
Estimated % of work by City's sub-contracts. %
Estimated% of work by City's agreement with C" of %
Record of revisions: by on ; by on ; by_on ; by_on
City or MCTO): of J of ; of of
Date received by MCTO:
Version
v1 Payment Option and Estimated%of work entered b Date:
Interagency Agreement, Capital EXHIBIT C
3�
8/18/99 8:34 AM Cost Tabulation Sheet City enter actual quantities.
. I Metro Transit Contract No. 98-015-72
FF� with the City of St.Anthon
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT TOTALS
PRICE
1.0 RETROFIT/INSTALL: NEW SIGN ON EXISTING SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE.
1.1 Retrofit existing sign with new sign. I - x I I= $ -
1.2 Install new sign on existing structure. 1xj !=Is
1.2.1 Lengthen existing pipe or post. x = $.
1.3 Install holder. 1XI =€$
1.4 Special 1.4: 1 1XI = $
X1.0 Sub-total =�$
2.0 REMOVE: EXISTING STRUCTURE WHERE EXISTING BUS SIGN &STOP ARE VACATED/RELOCATED.
2.1 Remove and patch, soil/blacktop. x =[s
2.2 Remove and patch, concrete. 1XI = $
2.0 Sub-total = $
3.0 INSTALL: NEW SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND SIGN.
3.1 U-post(concrete).
1xj
= $
3.2 U-post(non-concrete). x = $
3.3 Round pipe(concrete). 1XI = $
3.4 Round pipe(non-concrete). 1XI 1=,$
13.0 Sub-total 1=�$
4.0 OTHER. I
4.1 Special 4.1: x = $
4.2 Special 4.2: 1xi 1=4
4.0 Sub-total = $
GRAND TOTAL=[$
I �
� ; I
I i
Agreement(unit prices) PAYMENT OPTION NO. 1
Agreement(time& material) PAYMENT OPTION NO. 2
i
Approx. %of work done by City's own resources. I %
Approx. %of work done by City's sub-contracts.
Approx. % of work done by City's agreement with Ci of
Totals = %I I
Record of revisions: by on ; by_on ; by on ; by on
(City or WT.): of of of of
Version
v_1 Checked by Metro Transit Public Facilities Dept., by Date:
Date received by Metro Transit:
v I Quantities of work performed and approx.%of work entered by Date:
Page 1 Interagency Agreement, Capital EXHIBIT D
E -7
. EXHIBIT E
Lobbying Restriction Certification
I, ,hereby certify on behalf of
(Printed name and title of authorized official)
the City of St. Anthony:
a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid,by or on behalf of the undersigned,to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a
Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress
in connection with the awarding of any Federally funded contract,the making of any Federal grant,
the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with
this Federally funded contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete
and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its
instructions.
• c The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under
grants, loans, and cooperative agreements)and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose
accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into
this transaction imposed by Section 1352,Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for
each such failure.
Executed this day of , 19
By:
(Signature of Authorized Official)
(Title of Authorized Official)
Attest:
E-1
39
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 99-99-metrotransit
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT WITH METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (METRO TRANSIT)
RELATING TO BUS STOP SIGNS
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council (Metro Transit) has requested the City to participate in
a bus stop sign installation, replacement, and maintenance program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby approves the Joint Powers Agreement with the Metropolitan Council for Installation,
Replacement, and Maintenance of Bus Stop Signage in the City of St. Anthony.
. Adopted this day of , 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by Administration:
City Manager
IX. REVIEW METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES
RESOLUTION.
3CT
STAFF REPORT
To: Michael Morrison, City Manager
From: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant
Date: August 24, 1999
Subject: 1999 Livable Communities Act Status
In 1995, Staff worked with the Metropolitan Council to establish a housing action plan for the
City of St. Anthony in order to comply with legislation that encourages municipalities to
achieve and maintain livability and affordability goals for their individual communities. The
Met Council provided each community with benchmarks for these goals and St. Anthony was
determined to have met or exceeded these established livability and affordability goals.
As an incentive for adopting a housing action plan and supporting the Livable Communities
Act, the City became eligible for loans and grants from the Livable Communities Act Fund
that was established to support a city's efforts to maintain its housing goals. St. Anthony also
became eligible for funds from the Department of Trade and Economic Development to
. clean up certain polluted sites that might exist in the community. If the City should decide
not to continue its participation in this program, the City will no longer be eligible for any
funds associated with the Livable Communities Act.
Again this year, the City is not required to expend any funds for Affordable and Life-cycle
Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) because the City continues to meet and maintain
its housing goals. ALHOA expenditures are required for those communities who do not
meet their housing goals.
Since this commitment is required to be renewed annually by each city, attached is a
resolution for the Council's consideration.
�{ D
. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 99-METLIVABLECOM
A RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING
IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM
UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT
CALENDAR YEAR 2000
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.25
to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is
intended to address housing and other development issues facing the
metropolitan area defined by Minnesota statutes section 473.121; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base
Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and
the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and
other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and
WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under
the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain
. polluted sites clean up funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and
Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local
Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section
473.254; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to
negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life-cycle housing
goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of
the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development
Guide; and
WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the
municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals through
preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing,
negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for each participating
municipality; and
WHEREAS, the metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local
Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year;
. and
� 1
. Resolution
Page 2
WHEREAS, for calendar year 2000, a metropolitan area municipality that participated in the
Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1999, can
continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if; (a) the
municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account
Program by November 15, 1999; and (b) the Metropolitan Council and the
municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals
for the municipality.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan
Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 2000.
Adopted this day of , 1999.
. Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager
i
X. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUSINESS ASSISTANCE.
4z
STAFF REPORT
. To: Michael Morrison, City Manager
From: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant
Date: August 2, 1999
Subject: Minnesota Business Subsidies Law, 1999
As of August 1, 1999, local governments with the authority to provide business subsidies to
for-profit businesses with state or local government funds are subject to the newly revised
Business Subsidies Law. The new statute, Minn. Stat. 116J.993 to 116J.995 replaces Minn.
Stat. 116J.991, by adding new reporting requirements and procedures.
Basically, the new statute states that as a granting authority, a local government, as `grantor'
cannot sign a business subsidy agreement until the grantor holds a public hearing on and
adopts criteria for awarding of business subsidies. The set of criteria must include a policy,
regarding the wages to be paid for jobs created. The Commissioner of Trade and Economic
Development is available to assist cities in developing these criteria.-
A recipient subsidy agreement needs to be developed incorporating criteria developed from
the public hearing and can be flexible to accommodate the needs of the City, but must include
the following wage and job creation/retention goals; description of the subsidy requested;
statement of public purposes for the subsidy; goals for the subsidy; reason(s) why the subsidy
is needed; and other written information about the recipient. The subsidy agreement must be
signed by both the City and the recipient and approval by the City Council is required. No
public notice or hearing is required unless the subsidy is $100,000 or more.
The subsidy agreement also must include in addition to wage and job goals, the number of
jobs created and may include separate goals for the number of full-time and part-time jobs;
where job loss is imminent and demonstrable, goals for the number of jobs retained and wage
goals for jobs created and retained. These goals must be attained within 2 years of receiving
the subsidy.
The City is required to publish a public notice for requests that exceed $100,000 in the local
newspaper "of general circulation". The notice must identify the location of where
information about the business subsidy request and a copy of the subsidy agreement is
available. The published notice "must be sufficiently conspicuous in size and placement to
distinguish the notice from the surrounding text." The City is also required to make the
information available in printed paper copies and if possible on the InterNet.
The City is also required to monitor the progress of the recipient in achieving agreement
goals through information that is required to be submitted by the recipient for 2 years 4- 3
or until their goals are met,whichever is longer. The law requires that the recipient must
. continue to report back to the City even if the goals are not met and until the subsidy is
repaid. Again, the forms that the recipient will use to provide subsidy information will be
developed by the Commissioner and City representatives.
This report must be filed no later than March 1 of each year for the previous year and within
30 days after the deadline for meeting job and wage goals. If the City does not receive the
recipient's report, the City must mail a warning to the recipient within one week of the filing
date. The law allows that if, after 14 days of the postmarked date of the warnin-9, the recipient
fails to provide the required report, the recipient must pay the City a penalty of$100 for each
day that the report is not received until the report is filed. The maximum penalty that the City
can assess is $1,000. Copies of completed forms must be sent to the commissioner's
office and the City.
Cities of more than 2,500 must file a report with the commissioner by April 1 of each year
regardless if the city has or has not awarded any business subsidies in the previous year. If a
city fails to comply with the reporting requirements, the Commissioner will issue a written
warning. The city must comply by June land if the city fails to meet this deadline, no
business subsidies may be awarded until the city's report has been filed.
. As part of the report that the City will be required to file, the City must report a list of
recipients that did not complete the report; recipients that have not met their job and wage
goals within 2 years; and the steps being taken to bring them into compliance or to recoup the
subsidy.
These requirements are in effect August 1, 1999 and pertain only to those business subsidies
entered into on or after this date.
44-
DRAFT
4DRAFT
. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
BUSINESS SUBSIDIES POLICY
As of August 1, 1999, local governments with the authority to provide business subsidies to
for-profit businesses with state or local government funds are subject to the newly revised
Business Subsidies Law. The new statute, Minn. Stat. 116J.993 to 116J.995 replaces Minn.
Stat. 116J.991, by adding new reporting requirements and procedures.
Public Hearing to Adopt Business Subsidy Criteria. The new statute states that as a granting
authority,the City cannot sign a business subsidy agreement until the City holds a public
hearing on and adopts criteria for awarding of business subsidies. The set of criteria must
include a policy regarding the wages to be paid for jobs created. The Commissioner of Trade
and Economic Development is available to assist cities in developing these criteria.
Business Subsidy Agreement. A recipient subsidy agreement, incorporating criteria developed
from the initial public hearing establishing the City's awarding criteria, must include the
following:
1. Wage and job creation/retention goals and deadlines (within 2 years)
2. Description of the subsidy requested
a. the amount
b. type of subsidy (i.e., TIF)
C. type of district, if TIF
3. Statement of public purposes for the subsidy. Increasing the tax base is not
considered a public purpose. Job retention may be used if job loss is irr,m;,,ent.
4. Goals for the subsidy
5. Reason(s) why the subsidy is needed
6. Written commitment to continue operations at the site where the subsidy was
used for at least 5 years after the receipt of the subsidy
7. Description of the financial obligation if the recipient fails to meet the goals of
the subsidy agreement. An extension of 1 year may be granted after a public
hearing. Failure to meet the goals of the subsidy precludes the recipient from
receiving other business subsidies for 5 years.
8. The name and address of the parent corporation, if any
9. List of all financial assistance and grantors for the project
10. Business subsidies in the form of grants must be structured as forgivable loans
11. If the business subsidy benefits more than one recipient, the grantor must assign
a portion of the business subsidy to each recipient that signs the subsidy
agreement
. 12. The subsidy agreement must be signed by both the City and the recipient and
approval by the City Council is required. No public notice or hearing is
required unless the subsidy is $100,000 or more.
45
The subsidy agreement, as stated above, must include wage and job goals that state the
. number of jobs created and may include separate goals for the number of full-time and part-
time jobs or where job loss is imminent and demonstrable, goals for the number of jobs
retained; and wage goals for jobs created and retained. These goals must be attained within 2
years of receiving the subsidy.
Public Notice and Hearing for Requests that Exceed $100,000.
Public notice for requests that exceed $100,000 must be published in the local newspaper "of
general circulation". The notice must identify the location of where information about the
business subsidy request and a copy of the subsidy agreement is available. The published
notice "must be sufficiently conspicuous in size and placement to distinguish the
notice from the surrounding text." The City is also required to make the information
available in printed paper copies and if possible, on the InterNet.
Recipient Reports to Grantors. The City, as grantor, is required to monitor the progress of
the recipient in achieving agreement goals through information that is required to be
submitted by the recipient for 2 years or until their goals are met,whichever is longer. The
law requires that the recipient must continue to report back to the City even if the goals are
not met and until the subsidy is repaid.
. The report must be in the form as developed with the Commissioner of Trade and Economic
Development and City representatives and must include the following information:
a. The type, public purpose and amount of subsidies. If the subsidy is TIF, then
the type of district must be included.
b. The hourly wage of each job created, with separate bands of wages.
C. The sum of the hourly wages and cost of health insurance provided by the
employer,with separate bands of wages.
d. Date the job and wage goals will be reached. Must be within 2 years of receiving
the business subsidy award from the City.
e. A statement of goals identified in the subsidy agreement and an update on the
achievement of those goals.
f. The location of the recipient prior to receiving the business subsidy.
g. Why the recipient did not complete the project outlined in the subsidy
agreement at their previous location, if the recipient was previously located at
another site in Minnesota.
h. The name and address of the parent corporation of the recipient, if any.
i. A list of all financial assistance by all grantors for the project.
j. Other information as required or requested by the commissioner.
The recipient must file this report with the Commissioner and the City no later than March 1
• of each year for the previous year and within 30 days after the deadline for meeting job and
wage goals. Copies of completed forms must be sent to the commissioner's office and
the City. If the City does not receive the recipient's report, the City must mail a warning to
4-
the
the recipient within one week of the filing date. The law allows that if, after 14 days of tlik-
postmarked date of the warning, the recipient fails to provide the required report, the
recipient must pay the City a penalty of $100 for each day that the report is not received until
the report is filed. The maximum penalty that the City can assess is $1,000.
Report by the Grantors. The City is then required to file a report with the Commissioner by
April 1 of each year regardless if the City has or has not awarded any business subsidies in the
previous year. If the City fails to comply with the reporting requirements, the Commissioner
will issue a warning stating that the City must comply by June 1. If the City fails to meet this
deadline, no business subsidies may be awarded until the City's report has been filed.
As part of the report that the City will be required to file, the City must also submit a list of
recipients that did not complete the report; recipients that have not met their job and wage
goals within 2 years; and the steps being taken to bring them into compliance or to recoup the
subsidy.
Effective Date. These requirements are in effect August 1, 1999 and pertain only to those
business subsidies entered into on or after this date.
•
XI. REVIEW STUDY ON FINANCING VARIOUS CITY
PROJECTS.
. Financial Capacity/Debt Plan for the
City of St. Anthony, Minnesota
September 2, 1999
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Corporate Headquarters:
85 East Seventh Place
Suite 100
St. Paul,MN 55101-2887
(651)223-3000
(651)223-3002 Fax
Kansas City Office: Minneapolis Office:
7211 West 98th Terrace 520 Marquette Avenue
Suite 100 Suite 900
Overland Park,KS 66212-2257 Minneapolis,MN 55402
(913)345-8062 (612)333-9177
(913)381-8236 Fax (612)349-5230 Fax
Des Moines Office: Milwaukee Office: Washington,D.C. Office:
100 Court Avenue 8651 North Port Washington Road 2121 K Street NW
Suite 204 Suite A Suite 800
Des Moines,IA 50309-2200 Milwaukee,WI 53217 Washington,D.C. 20037
(515)244-1599 (414)247-8686 (202)261-6505
(515)244-1508 Fax (414)247-8649 Fax (202)261-6504 Fax
E-mail- advisors@springsted.com
Executive Summary 4 g
Springsted Incorporated was engaged by the City of St. Anthony (the "City") to help determine
. the most cost-efficient way to finance capital improvement projects in the years 1999 through
2004 (the "Study").
Effective capital planning requires the matching of capital requirements with available
resources. A list of potential capital projects must be paired against the total financial resources
of a community in order to arrive at an optimal investment portfolio. Therefore, to effectively
meet the challenges of the City's Capital Improvement Plan ("CIP"), it is necessary to assess
the City's total resources available for capital expenditures. Once these parameters have been
established, the City will be able to more effectively assess the projects that have been
proposed for City funding.
Projects
The following is showing the seven identified capital improvement projects for the City and the
recommended sources of payment and techniques of financing.
- Kecorrimended Source of
--
Projects Total Estimated Costs Payment Recommended Financing Technique
Improvement Bonds,Stormw ater
Ux of Bonds,Grants&Aids, Revenue Bonds, MSA Bonds and
Flood Mitigation/Street Reconstruction $ 8,530,000 and Fees. Grants and Aids
Public Works Building 1,800,000 Tax Levy/Operations HRA Lease Revenue
General Obligation Bond subject o
Central Park 700,000 Tax Levy/Operations voter referendum
. Fre Station 1,500,000 Tax Levy/Operations HRA Lease Revenue
Off-Sale Liquor Store 1,000,000 Liquor Store Revenues Revenue Bonds
Costs are prohibitive-Not
Salvation Army 13,600,000 None Recommending
ear p al Equipmente
Capital Equipment 360,000 Aside Yearly Capital Equipment Set Aside
Total Uses $ 27,490,000
Flood Mitigation/Street Reconstruction- The City has identified approximately $8.53 million in
flood mitigation/street reconstruction projects. Projected funding is to come from the following
sources:
Street Improvement Bonds $1,700,000
Minnesota State Aid
Bonds (MSA) 400,000
DNR 3,540,000
Storm Sewer Bonds/Utility
Fund Bonds 2,040,000
Other Governments/Grants 850,000
Total $8,530,000
The City can issue the $1,700,000 in planned Street Improvement Bonds as long as at least
20% of the project costs are assessed back to the benefited properties (Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429).
2 SPRINGSTED Page 1
Executive Summa, 4
. The City had originally identified $1.5million in projects to be paid for from MSA funds. The City
does not have the ability to issue $1.5 million in MSA Bonds. Based on the statutory formula
the maximum the City could issue is $895,000 (Minnesota Statute 162.18). In addition to the
Bonds the City would receive an additional $137,000 per year in M.S.A. funds that would not be
dedicated to debt service that could be used to fund projects on a cash basis. However, these
two techniques will not cover the entire amount designated. Of the $1.5 million only $400,000 is
available from the MSA Bonds to pay for the Flood Mitigation/Street reconstruction projects.
The City does have the ability to issue $2,040,000 in General Obligation Stormwater Revenue
Bonds. The Enterprise fund currently has revenues of approximately $160,000 a year which
could support an estimated maximum of$2,040,000 in General Obligation Storm Sewer Bonds
(Minnesota Statutes Chapter 444).
Public Works Building- The City has several options for financing the public works buildings.
Springsted recommends the City issue lease revenue bonds through their Housing and
Redevelopment Authority ("HRA").
Central Park—The City has fewer financing options for the Central Park improvements.
Springsted recommends the City put the question to the voters in order to issue General
Obligation Bonds.
Fire Station The City has several options for financing the Fire Station. Springsted recommends
the City issue lease revenue bonds through their Housing and Redevelopment Authority
• ("HRA").
Off-Sale Liquor Store —The liquor store operations are generating sufficient profit to finance the
$1,000,000 in Liquor Revenue Bonds.
Salvation Army—The valuation report of the Salvation Army was received by the City with a
comparable value of$13,600,000. The City does not have the debt capacity to issue the bonds.
In addition the cost is too prohitive for the voters to support. Springsted recommends that the
City not proceed towards financing the purchase of the property through tax levies.
Capital Equipment—The City sets aside from the operational budget $75,000 a year for capital
equipment purchases. Based on the capital equipment plan's identied needs for the city
through the next five years Springsted recommends that the City increase this amount to
$100,000 per year (APPENDIX I.
TIF-The TIF portion of the Study will be discussed in a separate report.
•
2 SPRINGSTED Page 2
Executive Summar 50
• Capital Improvement Projects
Uses
OFlood Mitigation/Street
Reconstruction
7% ®Capital Equipment
11 % ❑Public Works Building
pCentral Park
5% NFlre Station
ElOff-Sale Liquor Store
13% 61 %
3%
Capital Im provernent Plan
Financing Techniques
pBond Issuance/ 100% Taxes
2% Ooh ®Bond Issuance- 35% Taxes
10% lr 10% OUtility Fund/Revenue Bond
1 C3Grants/Fed Other Funds
2% t 00peratmg Funds
t
18% pFund Balance
®MSA Funds
22% pCapital Equipment
=TIF
19%
17%
® SPRINGSTED Page 3
. Executive Summar) 5
Recommendations for Consideration
• Operations
Three key elements are impacting the City's operations. The tax levy limit, limited growth and
the tax levy compression.
In legislature impassed a levy limit which limits the amount of taxes the City can levy for
operations, with adjustments for growth. City's with limited growth characteristic of more mature
communities, along with the levy limits, create a challenging environment for cities to raise
revenues. One method some city's use is to finance their capital equipment purchases through
debt issuance. This allows the City to place the debt service on the debt levy rather than
through the operational levy which is subject to the limit. This allows the City to redirect those
funds towards other governmental needs.
The City has been impacted by the tax levy compression. Over time the legislature has
changed the class rates of taxable property particularly for commercial and industrial property,
thereby shifting more of the tax burden to homeowners and others. The result has been that
some communities have seen a decrease in their total taxable net tax capacity, or in other
words the total amount they may levy. The exact fiscal impact of the compression and a
strategy to deal with the compression would require further study.
Fund Balance
More communities have begun turning their past practices into formal policies. Currently, the
City's practice has been to maintain the fund balance at around 25% of revenues. Springsted
. recommends that the City increase this amount to 50% of revenues.
Capital Improvement Funding
The City should consider formalizing the City's past practices into a set of policies governing the
use of debt financing. Some examples of items included in a debt management policy from
other cities include:
a. Direct debt shall not exceed 80% of statutory debt limit as a means to preserve
statutory debt capacity for unforeseen catastrophic events.
b. debt will be retired over no more than 20 years.
C. An internal feasibility analysis shall be prepared for each long-term financing which
analyzes the impact on current and future budgets for debt service and operations.
The analysis shall also address the reliability of revenues to support debt service.
® SPRINGSTED Page 4
Executive Summan 5 z
. d. The City shall conduct financings on a competitive basis unless for reasons of
market volatility, the use of an unusual financing structure, or a complex security
structure indicates the negotiated financing is preferred.
e. The City will monitor all forms of debt on an annual basis coincident with the city's
Budget and Capital Improvement Program hearing process and report concerns and
remedies, if needed, to the City Council.
f. For Enterprise operations and property owner-initiated financings, the City will
attempt to issue debt that is self-supporting for user fees and charges,
assessments, and special taxes, and not backed or funded by General Fund
revenues.
g. The City will seek to maintain its rating on any direct debt and will seek credit
enhancements, such as Letter of Credit or insurance, when necessary for marketing
purposes, availability, and cost-effectiveness.
h. The City shall diligently monitor its compliance with bond covenants and ensure its
adherence with federal arbitrage regulations.
i. Advance refunding of outstanding bonds will be considered when the present value
savings, at a minimum, are in excess of the cost of issuing refunding bonds.
. j. The City will work with overlapping debt issuance jurisdictions to develop a
coordinated debt management program.
k. Capital improvements should be funded primarily using user fees, service charges,
assessments, special taxes or developer agreements when benefits can be
attributed to users of the facility.
I. User fees and charges will be directly related to the "full cost" of providing the
service (direct and indirect costs). These fees and charges will be reviewed and
revised annually, as required.
New Revenues
Property Tax: The City must make a policy decision regarding service levels. Maintaining
current service levels necessitates increasing the City's levy. The City should investigate
alternative levy scenarios, especially in light of the levy limitation.
Comprehensive Annual Review: All revenue items should be reviewed annually.
Debt Financing: The City has a variety of financing vehicles at its disposal including General
Obligation Bonds, CIP Bonds, various types of Revenue Bonds, and financing leases. The
selection of a particular financing vehicle will be made annually based upon overall financing
needs and market conditions. The city will identify, analyze, and dedicate a revenue source to
fund debt service on any proposed issue.
. Other: The City should investigate other revenue sources which assign particular benefit.
® SPRINGSTED Page 5
53
MEMORANDUM
. DATE: April 8, 1999
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
Planning Commissioners
FROM: Michael Mornson, City Manager
ITEM: TIF SUMMARY
The following are the TIF activities that the Council discussed at the April 6, 1999 Work Session.
Project Activity Funds That Could Be Status
Authorized
Not Yet Spent
Redevelop vacant property between $233,000 No activity
Industrial custom Products and the Amoco
Station on 37`h Avenue NE
. Bridge work along Silver Lake Road $100,000 Project scheduled for 1999/2000
between 37`h Avenue NE and Silver Lane (may need to increase, based on
bids)
Redevelop bowling alley property on $40,000 No activity
Kenzie Terrace
Redevelop St. Anthony Shopping Center $60,000 No activity (we may want to
area along New Brighton Boulevard and increase this), add $600,000
Kenzie Terrace
Redevelop vacant lots by Twin City $75,000 No activity
Federal
Redevelop 10 residential lots by Kenzie $1,050,000 Have purchased 3 homes, spent
plus add Kentucky Fried Chicken, pizza, spent $250,000 (we may want t
video properties and Firstar lot increase this),
was $1.3 million, add $300,000
Redevelop Apache Plaza area $520,000 Spent $300,000 on CUB Foods
project (we may want to increas
this), was $820,000
Streetscape within the City (new) $250,000 No activity
Page 2
• )1
Expenditure total......................................... $2,328,000
Total funds available based
on Springsted study...................................... $3,706,000
Available funds to allocate............................. $1,378,000 (leave $378,000 in fund for shortages
based on commercial rate change)
Other possible properties:
Hardies parcel
Pizza Hut parcel
55
ABTHE APPRAISAL B UREA U
• Consulting Valuation Engineers
5955 Golden Valley Road, Suite 201 -Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
(612) 595-7126/Fax (612) 595-7127
August 24, 1999
Mr. Michael J. Mornson, City Manager
Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, NIN 55418-1699
REFERENCE: PRIMARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS TO ESTIMATE VALUE RANGE FOR
THE SLIVER LAKE SALIVATION ARMY CAMP(101 ACRES)LOCATED AT THE
SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SLIVER LAKE ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD E.
Dear Mr.Momson:
Based on your request we have pursued the research necessary to give an opinion of value range under the
various potential highest best use. The various uses that I have considered possible are:
I. Residential-
Mixture of detached residential homesites—some with lakeshore,and a limited amount of
town houses.
. II. Corporate Headquarters-
There are many corporations today who want a relaxed atmosphere for the corporate
headquarters.
III. City or County Park-
The search that was done for government purchased parks was inconclusive. Data was not
found within the time frame of this research assignment. I am sure there is sale data. There
have been parks purchased and formed within the last fifteen years,but I could not get the
sale information.
Therefore, as of this point,I could not come to any conclusion as to what the value sales of other parks
would indicate for the subject.
If the results of this particular, park type, research are important and you feel that additional research would
be wanted, we could continue this part of the project. Additional time would be required.
The research and the analysis of our research is summarized below:
I. Residential Development
Value Range of the subject site,if developed as a residential subdivision. After considerable
research I have found a sale of 51 acres in Golden Valley which also has good attractive
lakeshores,very similar to the subject in its physical and location amenities.
The subject,based on my drawing,could be developed with about 25-26 lakeshore lots, 14
. detached single family lots and have about 13 acres left for townhouse development.
5 CP
• Mr. Michael J. Morrison
Page 2
August 24, 1999
The information received about the Golden Valley, Sweeney Lake, location is
as follows:
Site Size-51 Acres
Sale Date: June 1997
Sale Price: $1,300,000
Plus:
Demolition of building $2,000,000
Asbestosis Removal $4,000,000
Total $7,300,000 (base cost for land acquisition)
$7,300,000/51 acres $ 143,137
Sale Price Per Acre $ 143,137
Say,
$ 145,000
The adjustments to this sale price are as following:
Sale Price per Acre $ 145,000
. Time—mid 1997(+16%) $ 23,200
Current Cash Sale Price $ 168,200
Site Size(-15%) ($ 25,200)
Topography Modification $ 0
Location $ 0
Risk Factor ($ 8,400)
Indication of Value/Acre $ 134,600
101 acres @$134,600 = $13,600,000
The second raw land sale took place in 1995. It had no lakeshore but it was located in a very
prestigious area of Edina. It was developed into eleven(11)lots and they sold in the
$400,000 to$485,000 range. They sold within one year. Note all of the lots sold above
$400,000 indicating that a location adjustment is necessary.
The adjustments for this site are noted below:
Location: 5000 Blake Road
Sale Price: $2,700,000
Sale Date: 10/1995
Site Size: 10.79 acres
Sale Price Per Acre: $250,200
Adjustment
Time(+30%): 75,000
Time Adjust Sale Price: $ 325,200
. Risk factor(-15%): ($ 48,800)
Subject Size(-25%): ($ 81,300)
Location: ($ 12,500)
Topography Modification6($ 5,300)
Indicated Price Per Acre $ 117,300
5
. Mr. Michael J. Morrison
Page 3
August 24, 1999
This sale indicates the following value for the subject site:
101 acres @$117,300 = $11,850,000
II. Corporate or Multi-Tenant Office Location
There have been a couple of sales in the Southdale/I-494/France Avenue area where the sites
were used for office, multi-tenant,buildings. These sites and the structures that were built on
them could have just as easily been corporate locations. Sale information was not available.
Golden Valley Site
The Golden Valley site was sold in September 1997. It consisted of 4.82 acres and sold for
$1,514,395,or$7.21 per square foot. The site has frontage and exposure on Highway 55
(Olson Memorial Highway),but access from Golden Valley Road.
The proposed construction is two(2) multi-tenant structures with occupancy in the medical
related field. The improvements are multi-story buildings,which did not require ramp type
parking due to their lot size.
The subject site, if used for a corporate structure,would not be turned into a parking lot. In
order to retain the site amenities I am sure the city could require ramp parking in order to
. maintain as much green area as possible.
This sale indicates the following value ranges:
Location: 8301 Golden Valley Road
Sale Date: September 1997
Sale Price: $1,514,395
Site Size: 310,000 square feet
Sale Price Per Acre: $7.21 per square foot
Indicated Price Per Acre: $ 314,100
Adjustments:
Time @ 10% $ 31,400
Current Sales Price Per Acre: $ 345,500
Adjustments:
Location $ 0
Site Size(-25%) ($ 86,370)
City Utilities @$0.50/sq.ft. ($ 21,800)
Topography Modification-
@$1.50 per sq. ft. ($ 65,300)
Parking Ramp—
83 stalls @$12,000/ 101 ($ 9,900)
Value Indication Per Acre $ 162,200
. Value for 101 Acres $ 16,380,000
S13
• Mr. Michael J. Momson
Page 4
August 24, 1999
Fridley Sale
Ms. Barb Dacy of the Fridley Development Office indicated that Medtronic also paid$6.00 to
$8.00 per square foot for their new site at Central and the I-694 intersection. This was net
dollars to Medtronic. For this they purchased about 10 acres,in a ready-to-build condition.
No soil contamination problems.
This indicated value range is for one of the best commercial/office sites in the northeast
suburban area. In my opinion, I feel the market would look with equality on the Medtronic
site vs. the Silver Lake site. If,however,visibility was important the 1-694 site is better. The
Sliver Lake site offers"an environment". This peace and tranquillity less the stressful
environment for office space is becoming more and more of an influence in the market place.
This type of environment was started locally in Roundhorse's Opus development in the
southeast corner of Minnetonka(northwest quadrant of the 169/62 Crosstown intersection).
This corporate atmosphere has also been used in other areas in the Twin Cities and has
worked with single and multi-tenant office buildings.
In my opinion,there would be no location adjustment for this Fridley site. The other
adjustments are noted below:
. Site Size—Ten(10)acres.
@$6.00 per sq. ft.,or$260,000 per acre
@$8.00 per sq.ft.,or$348,500 per acre
Indication of Value Ranges
Per Acre @$ 260,000 @$ 348,500
Adjustment:
Time $ 25,300 $ 35,200
Current Sales Price Per Acre $ 285,300 $ 383,700
Less Location $ 0 $ 0
Less Site Size(-25%) ($ 71,300) ($ 95,900)
Less City Utilities—
@$0.50 per sq. ft. ($ 21,800) ($ 21,800)
Topography Modification
@$1.50 per sq. ft. ($ 65,300) ($ 65,300)
Parking Ramp $ 0 $ 0
. Value Indication Per Acre $ 126,900 $ 200,700
Value for 101 Acres $ 12,800,000 0 $ 20,300,000
S
• Mr. Michael J. Mornson
Page 5
August 24, 1999
Ms. Dacy also indicated that if the site were purchased as raw land(without the development
cost, the Medtronic site was about$100,000 per acre.
This value attributable to the subject indicates the following value:
101 acre @$100,000 per acre = $ 10,000,000
In summary the above noted research and and corresponding questionable analysis indicated the following
possible value ranges.
I. Value range as residentially developed
$13,600,000—Sweney Lake/Golden Valley
$11,850,000—Blake Road/Edina
II. Corportable Headquarters
$16,380,000—Golden Valley Sale
$12,800,000-$20,300,000—Medtronic Sale
$10,000,000—Medtronic Raw Land Sale
@ III. City or County Park
No significant data found.
* Best and most reasonable comparable
R ectfully submitted,
THE APP ISA BUREAU
T or,MAI, SRA
Senior ppraiser
MN License No. 4000015
/pb
• TOWNSHIP � RAN(
(� D
NORTH WEST (�) SECTION 31
-rY� ROAD 1,1��LOWERY AOAD� T-
sEC =�•s" ('l O U N y.
dJ.
rr 'J�, ,. rd r Ole-
"It
?•'G ..M
•• T i
a
/6 fN THIS b A COITHE
RECORDS AS
i THEY APPEARR IN IN TIIE RAM6ET COUNTY
OFFICES AFFECTING THE AREA SHOWN.
THIS DRAWING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR
REFERENCE PURPOSES AND THE 000N-
�' TT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY IN-
dll ACCURACIES HEREIN CONTAINED.
p M
•....—u lA a �'�- � 1 D r
w �
� Y
��A �j (/) J Terl+••119. O.a.
%ALVATICN AAMV
\ to (1)
I.
i' j
IL
WN 9 r v
m h'9 1 A SS1N �� \fid ® ,.-��" u1.•.
09 — —
ul 60
• • / S .J.•! •a. .i.
da. po
f 1 1•
�C,NO
If 114 CORI
i � c • 2
-SILVER LAKE SEC 36 � - �.... � �1 fr?(y ® .. G+) ••-
BEACH .. •• r l9 (s) y. ..a
•Y• S/`L MEAN ED i s
..O • ♦ r 0.• ....
•- a n!�: .L• 1 I e �. Opti S '� ^0 !•
XII. DISCUSS FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS.
::viii `': thn :. = : AugU4 25,-1999
• FUTURE COUNCIL,AGENDA-ITEMS-
Meeting Date Meeting Type Item/Issue
September 14 Regular Public hearing, re: authorize tax rate increase
Res., Tax levy and budget
Res., Authorizing feasibility study of 33`d Avenue NE
project
Res., Hennepin County road maintenance agreement
Res., Met Council liveable community
Res., Accept feasibility study and authorize plans &
specs for 29`h Avenue NE project
Proclamation declaring September 24 Kiwanis Peanut
Day
Res., Met Transit agreement
HRA Claims
September 28 Regular Planning Commission report - September 21
Approve election judges for 11/2 local election
October 5 Work Session SEH/RCM progress update on Public Works building
6:00 PM
October 12 Regular Public hearing on criteria for business assistance
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 BUDGET PLANNING WORKSESSION MINUTES
•
3 August 4, 1999 4 6:30 p.m.
5
6
7 I. CALL TO ORDER.
8 Meeting called to order at 6:30 p.m.
9
10 II. ROLL CALL.
11 Councilmembers Present: Ranallo, Marks, Faust, and Cavanaugh.
12 Councilmembers Absent: Thuesen.
13 Also Present: Michael Morrison, City Manager; Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant;
14 Dick Engstrom, Police Chief; Dick Johnson, Fire Chief; Roger Larson, Finance Director; Jay
15 Hartman, Public Works; and Mike Larson, Liquor Operations Manager.
16
17 III. PRESENTATION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR YEAR 2000.
18 The Mayor briefly described the reason for this evening's meeting and the budgeting process.
19 He also described the process for setting the City's levy.
20
21 The City Manager reviewed the overall levy process to fund the City's next year's budget. He
22 listed key dates to the budget calendar. He reported September 14' as the first City Council
23 meeting in which the tax levy can be approved; October 5`h is scheduled as the budget
24 worksession with Staff; and November 30' is the City's public hearing date, with a
.25 reconvening hearing and/or public hearing for passage of Year 2000 final tax levy. The City
26 Manager reported that the proposed budget will be discussed with Staff at the October 5`h
27 worksession.
28
29 The City manager and the Finance Director reviewed the proposed budget for Year 2000.
30 They reported that Staff is proposing a General Operating Budget of$3,527,450, which
31 represents an increase of 4.91%. The Finance Director explained that the State has once again
32 imposed levy limits and the City's levy limit for taxes collected in Year 2000 is $1,646,970
33 and for the City represents an increase of 1.91% from last year. He is recommending that the
34 Council adopt the amount as proposed because the City could later decide to reduce the amount
35 of levy if the full amount is not needed, but it cannot be increased once the amount is adopted
36 and submitted to the County Auditor.
37
38 The City Manager reviewed the new additions to the proposed Year 2000 budget. He indicated
39 that if the Council had any corrections, revisions or additional suggestions for the Management
40 Letter or other text, to let Staff know.
41
42 IV. OTHER BUSINESS.
43
44 1. Park Dedication. The Mayor reported on the dedication for Water Tower Park. He
45 reported that the turn out was great. He reported that everyone that attended was able
• 46 to enjoy great music and ice cream.
47
1 2. 2809 - 30' Avenue. The City Manager reported that the property located at 2809 -
2 30'' Avenue is for sale. WSB reported that acquisition of the property would provide
0 3 the needed access for maintenance and storm water diversion. The Council directed the
4 City Manager to contact the realtor and report to the Council at the August 10' Council
5 Meeting. The City Manager reported that the soil borings have been taken and he is
6 waiting for the results. The City Manager also reported that there has been vandalism
7 to the survey stakes.
8
9 3. 2800 St. Anthony Boulevard. The City Manager reported that he contacted the owners
10 of 2800 St. Anthony Boulevard and they are not interested in selling. He also indicated
11 that he contacted the Hobans and Nesses regarding the possibility of selling their
12 property. He reported that he will meet with the Kuharskis before August 24'h to let
13 them know of the status.
14
15 V. ADJOURNMENT.
16 The City Council budget worksession meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
17
18 Respectfully Submitted by,
19
20
21
22 Kim Moore-Sykes
23 Management Assistant
2