Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 93-043 RESOLUTION APPROVING MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. AS ENGINEERS FOR THE 1994 STREET CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS Meeting Sheet IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIII 103510 Box: 26 Folder: RES 1993 Document: CC RES 93-043 RESOLUTION APPROVING MAZER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. AS ENGINEERS FOR THE 1994 STREET CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS • CITY OF ST. ANTHONY RESOLUTION 93-043 A RESOLUTION APPROVING MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. AS ENGINEERS FOR THE 1994 STREET CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony desires to continue with the City's Pavement Management Program during 1994 with selected street construction improvements; and WHEREAS, Maier Stewart & Associates, Inc. has submitted a proposal to perform engineering services for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves Maier Stewart & Associates to perform the engineering services for the City's 1994 street construction improvements. • Adopted this :P-01 day of 4 , 1993. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed for administration: City Manager / CONSULTING ENGINEERS � Inc.Maier Stewart & Associates June 29, 1993 File No: 900-020-00 Mr. Larry Hamer Director of Public Works St. Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 RE: ENGINEERING SERVICES 1994 STREET CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE Dear Mr. Hamer: Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and submit a proposal for your 1994 construction improvement projects. We understand the 1994 construction program to be the following projects as based on your meeting with me and site review. As we understand the basis for selecting the streets is their deteriorated condition and the desire to complete improvements to that area of town before moving onto the rest of the community. These projects also keep the construction costs at around $500,000 in size. Proposed Reconstruction Surface Tyne Length feet 1. 32nd Avenue NE, from Rankin Road to Bituminous 1,280 Silver Lake Road 2. Hilldale Avenue NE, from Rankin Road to Bituminous 1.280 to Silver Lake Road Total Length (Reconstruction) 2,560 ft. Proposed Overlay Surface Tyne Le> (feet) 1. Croft Drive, from 32nd Avenue NE to Bituminous 660 33rd Avenue NE 490-2901.jun 9800 SHELARD PARKWAY,SUITE 102,MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 1959 SLOAN PLACE,SUITE 200,ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021 • Equal Opportunity Employer i Engineering Services �I June 29, 1993 Page Two 2. Skycroft Drive, from 32nd Avenue NE Bituminous 660 33rd Avenue NE 3. 31st Avenue NE, from Rankin Road to Bituminous 1,280 Silver Lake Road 4. Rankin Road, from 32nd Avenue NE to Bituminous 680 33rd Avenue NE 5. 32nd Avenue NE, from Croft Drive Bituminous 660 Rankin Road Total Length (Overlay) 3,940 ft. The scope of work for these projects would be as follows: Reconstruction 1. Remove and replace curb and gutter. 2. Remove and replace surfacing with seven-ton per axle bituminous streets, thirty-two feet wide from back of curb to back or curb. 3. Remove and replace storm sewer as necessary. 4. Replace water main. 5. New driveway aprons - cut driveways to match new grade. Match existing width and material. 6. No sanitary sewer replacement. City to televise. Repair on own. 7. Restoration and resigning as necessary. 8. No sidewalk is proposed. Overlay 1. Crack sealing and patching by City. 2. Repair curb and gutter as necessary. 3. Mill edge of bituminous both sides to match concrete gutter. 4. 1/ 1/2" bituminous overlay on all streets listed, twenty-six feet wide from face of gutter to face of gutter. The scope of engineering services for these projects is proposed as follows (costs are identified based on a total construction cost of$550,000.00 for reconstruction and overlay improvements for the work described above): 490.2901.jun • Engineering Services June 29, 1993 Page Three Estimated Task Cost 1. Feasibility Studies Prepared $ 6,930.00 (Projects to be assessed per State Statute 429) 2. Public Information Hearings 2,310.00 3. Soil Testing Report 2,000.00 4. Prepare Contract Documents (Plans & Specs) 27,720.00 5. Receipt of Proposals 950.00 6. Assessment Roll Preparation 3,500.00 7. Contract Submittals 575.00 8. Progress Meetings 1,560.00 • 9. Final Acceptance 575.00 10. Record Drawings 950.00 11. Construction Staking 16,500.00 12. Full Time Resident Inspection $22,000.00 Not-To-Exceed Engineering Costs $85,570.00 It is assumed that no right-of-way or easement acquisition is needed for these improvements. If, during the course of the project, the scope of work changes the engineering costs would change and we would prvide a revised not-to-exceed cost in writing for city consideration. The schedule for the upcoming 1994 projects is broken down as follows: • 490-2901.jun • Engineering Services June 29, 1993 Page Four PROJECT SCHEDULE Action Date City Council Orders Feasibility Studies July 20, 1993 City Council Receives Feasibility Studies September 14, 1993 City Council Orders Preparation of Plans and Specifications September 14, 1993 Neighborhood Meetings Held for Reconstruction Projects Only November, 1993 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes December 14, 1993 Advertisement for Bids City Council Receives Bids February 8, 1994 Hold Public Improvement Hearing February 22, 1994 Hold Assessment Hearing February 22, 1994 (wait 30-day legal appeal period) Award Construction Contract March 22, 1994 Begin Construction May, 1994 Complete Construction August, 1994 Please note that the schedule indicates that the bidding period for the improvements would be in January and February, 1994. The City may realize some cost savings by bidding this time of year, as opposed to bidding the project later in the year. As in the 1993 street project, we have proposed neighborhood meetings to get the residents involved early in the process. Again, we are also proposing that the project be bid prior to a public improvement hearing on the project. This provides for hard costs not just estimates so people have a real sense of the true costs of the projects. Finally, we have shown the assessment hearing the same night as the public improvement hearing. This allows the City Council to determine the extent of objection to the project prior to the award of a construction contract. We would be pleased to preset this proposal to the City Council at your earliest convenience. Yours very truly, MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas J. Madigan, P.E. Vice President • 490-2901.jun