HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL MINUTES 07311979 a
Meeting Sheet
IIIIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIIIVIII IIIIIIII
105999
Box: 36
Folder: PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1979
Document: PL MINUTES 07311979
T
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
• PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
July 31 , 1979
The meeting was called to order at 7 : 07 p.m. by Chairman Pro Tem
Rymarchick.
Present for roll call : Bjorklund, Jones , Sopcinski , Bowerman,
Enrooth, and Rymarchick.
Absent: Marks .
Also present: Jim Fornell , City Manager
Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant
Before the Board began their review of the Comprehensive Plan, they
were asked to consider a request of a signage variance for the pro-
posed Sibley Catalog Showroom building at 3701 Stinson Boulevard.
After a brief discussion concerning the legality of the considera-
tion at a non-regularly scheduled meeting, it was agreed that the
matter is an administrative procedure, legal , and that the Board
would be willing to hear the request at this time due to a time
element problem which it would otherwise cause Sibley in light of
their proposed September 1 opening date.
Mr. James Ruvelson of Ruvelson and Associates , a sign consultant
firm, presented the proposal on behalf of Sibley. Also present was
Donald S . Mears, representing Sibley Catalog.
Mr. Ruvelson outlined the proposal which called for the utilization
of two existing blank signs (facing north and east) and the erection
of another sign to the west. The dimensions and square footage of
these signs would be north 60x12=720; east 40x8=320 ; west 5x25=125 ,
for a total requested square footage of 1165 . In a July 25, 1979
memorandum to the Board, the Administrative Assistant stated the
staff' s opinion regarding allowable square footage was 270 . Mr.
Ruvelson cited the unique location of the building in question,
and the fact that the floor area is 55,000 square feet, as miti-
gating circumstances that should be considered in this variance
proposal. He also stated the color scheme would be low key, i .e . ,
orange lettering on brown background. Mr. Ruvelson also stated
that studies have shown that signage contributes up to 40 percent
to a business and that should be considered in view of the depressed
business history of this site.
Mr. Jones was assured that with Sibley (along with Red Owl) the
building would be fully occupied and therefore there would be no
other requests for sign variances for this building.
-2-
In response to the question on how the proposed new sign ordinance
might deal with the problem, Mr. Berg replied that although com-
mercial square footage requirements have not been formulated, there
would be no way that requests of this magnitude would be satisfied
without a variance. Mr. Ruvelson agreed on the importance of a
sign ordinance , but that the Board must have a gut feeling on what
is proper judgment in special cases. It was the general consensus
of the Board that the existing north-facing sign (60x12 at front
door) was very unattractive and its continued use should not be
encouraged. Mr. Ruvelson then asked if, because of the time frame
problem, some temporary agreement could be reached with the City
whereby the requested signage would be allowed for the opening
date with the understanding that remodeling or acceptable signage
would be erected later. Mr. Fornell felt, however, that this would
involve staff and City Attorney time and that the matter would then
still have to be resolved at a regularly scheduled meeting.
In response to a request for a motion by Chairman Pro Tem Rymarchick, motion by
Mr. Jones and seconded by Mr. Bowerman to recommerid the Council grant Sibley
Catalog Showrooms a variance to place no more than 435 square feet
of signage on the east-facing and west-facing facades of the build-
ing with the understanding to approve signage for the north-facing
facade not to exceed a total of 600 square feet of signage for the
entire building. This approval is made in consideration of : the
time frame problem created by the September 1 opening; the size
(55, 000 square feet) ; only two tenants will be in this building
and no more requests for signage will be forthcoming; 40 percent
• of the business volume can be contributed to signage; the resulting
positive impact on an area with a depressed business history; and
total allowable sign square footage is disproportionate to that
which would be allowed a smaller business operation.
Following this motion, Mr. Jones also remarked that the City needs
to show support to incoming businesses , that he believes that Sibley
is concerned on the image it will project and that the proposed
earthtone colors will be a tremendous improvement over the present
signage.
The Board also voiced its concern that no more than 15 percent of
the east-facing wall would be occupied by signage since Red Owl
already has signage on this side. It was agreed that this would
not be the case.
Chairman Rymarchick asked that the question be called.
Voting on the question:
Aye: Jones, Bjorklund, Rymarchick, Bowerman, Sopcinski, Enrooth.
Nay: None.
•
-3-
Voting on the Motion:
• Aye: Jones, Bowerman , Sopcinski , Enrooth.
Nay: Bjorklund, Rymarchick.
Motion carried.
Following the variance consideration, the Board reviewed with Mr.
Bill Weber of B.R.W. , Inc. , the first section of the St. Anthony
Comprehensive Plan (Inventory and Analysis) as presented by Mr.
Weber. The Board made suggestions for certain revisions and up-
dating of the section.
It was thereafter agreed that a date for a future work session
would be decided upon at the next regularly scheduled Board meeting.
Motion by Mr. Jones and seconded by Mr. Bjorklund to adjourn the
meeting.
Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 10 : 34 p.m.
• Respectfully submitted,
Ronald O. Berg
Administrative Assistant
ROB :pjr