HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 04182006 Meeting Sheet
IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
104954
Box: 33
Folder: PL PACKETS 2005-2011
Document: PL PACKET 04182006
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission
April 15, 2006
5:45 pm
5:46 pm Food provided for members of Commission and Council
6:00 pm Meeting called to order by Mayor Faust
Presentation and discussion of 2006 Goals by Mayor and Council
Other Business
Adjourn by 7 pm for regular Planning Commission Meeting
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
APRIL 18, 2006
6:00 P.M. JOINT COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
7:00 P.M. REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA.
IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 211, 2006
V. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
None.
VII. CONCEPT REVIEWS.
VII.1. Conditional Use Permit for a Tanning Salon-St. Anthony Shopping Center
VIII.INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION.
VIIIA. Comp Plan Task Force Update
IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
X. ADJOURNMENT.
FAP1anning\PC Agendas\2006\041806 pc agenda.doc
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21,2006
Page 1
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2
3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
4
5 March 21, 2006
6 7:00 p.m.
7
8
9 I. CALL TO ORDER.
10 Chair Stromgren called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
11
12 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
13 Chair Stromgren invited the Commission and the audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance.
14
15 III. ROLL CALL.
16 Commissioners present: Chair Stromgren;Vice Chair Hanson; Commissioners Galyon,
17 Hoska, Jensen and Jenson.
18
19 Absent: Commissioner Young.
20
21 Also present: Assistant City Manager Kim Moore-Sykes.
22
23 IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
24
25 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Item 8.1, Phase 11 of the Silver Lake Village Development-
26 Pratt/Hunter Association has been pulled from the agenda by the developer.. She stated that
27 representatives from the Silver Lake Development were not able to attend this evening due to
28 issues they are working through with the property.
29
30 Ms Moore-Sykes stated that Item 10.3, GTS Training Sessions in Planning, should be pulled
31 from the agenda, as it is a duplication of Item 8.2.
32
33 Motion by Vice Chair Hanson, second by Commissioner Jenson,to approve the meeting agenda
34 as amended.
35
36 Motion carried unanimously
37
38 V. MEETING MINUTES.
39
40 5.1 Review and Approve Planning Commission Minutes of February 21, 2006.
41
42 Motion by Vice Chair Hanson, second by Commissioner Galyon,to approve the meeting minutes
43 of the Planning Commission of February 21, 2006 as presented.
44
45 Motion carried unanimously
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21, 2006
Page 2
1
2 VI. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL
3
4 6.1 March 28, 2006 City Council Meeting Designee
5
6 Chair Stromgren stated that Commissioner Jan Jenson would attend the March 28, 2006 City
7 Council meeting.
8
9 VII. PUBLIC HEARING.
10
11 7.1 Conditional Use Permit—Dominium. LLC
12
13 Chair Stromgren opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
14
15 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that on January 23 2006 Staff received an application for a Conditional
16 Use Permit from Ms. Tonya Schelitzche, Dominium, Inc. for a beauty salon at the Active Seniors
17 Community of The Landings at Silver Lake Village. She explained that The Landings would like
18 to include a beauty salon as a personal service for their residents only. She said that because the
19 application was complete and included the fee,the City has to abide by the 60-Day Rule, which
20 requires a jurisdiction to take action on a zoning application within 60 days. She stated that a
21 letter was sent explaining that the City would require an extension of five days in order to
22 complete the review process and to take action on their request. She explained that Dominium
23 submitted an application for a conditional use permit for a beauty salon in The Landings at the
24 Silver Lake Active Senior Community. She noted that The Landings is located at the Silver Lake
25 Village, which is designated a Mixed Use PUD. She stated that properties that are designated as
26 a PUD generally have more flexibility in planning and may include only those uses generally
27 considered associated with the general land use category according to the Comprehensive Land
28 Use Plan. She noted that the City Code does state that in some unique situations,the PUD may
29 allow the approval of use or uses that are not listed as either permitted or conditional uses in any
30 underlying zoning district. She stated that Staff recommended that the property owner secure a
31 CUP because while this use is allowed in the Commercial Zoning District, it is not normally an
32 allowable use in a Residential Zoning District. She stated that Staff recommends approval of the
33 Conditional Use Permit based on the following conditions: Salon employees must be licensed by
34 the State Board of Barbers and Cosmetology; they must comply with State and County Public
35 Health Regulations for Salon operation; no external signage advertising the salon's services or
36 location; The salon exists for the convenience and service of The Landings' residents.
37
38 Justin Parr, Dominium,provided the Commission with a brief overview of the application for a
39 Conditional Use Permit. He explained that it is their plan to provide a beauty salon as a service
40 to the residents of The Landings and he assured the Commission that the service is only for the
41 residents of The Landings,that there would not be any signage or advertising and that the salon
42 would be staffed by licensed,third party individuals.
43
44 Chair Stromgren closed the public hearing at 7:10 p.m.
45
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21, 2006
Page 3
1 Motion by Commissioner Galyon, second by Commissioner Hoska, to recommend approval of
2 the Conditional Use Permit for Dominium, LLC for the salon to be located at the Landings.
3
4 Motion carried unanimously
5
6 7.2 Parking Variance—VSI Construction
7
8 Chair Stromgren opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
9
10 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that staff received call from Todd Mohagen, VSI Construction about the
11 possibility of building an office building on the vacant lot adjacent to Tires Plus. She stated that
12 Mr. Mohagen advised Staff that the building would be leased as offices for realtors, insurance
13 agents, accountants, and attorneys. She noted that Staff also met with Brent Thompson, S &T
14 Development,who is the lead for this project. She explained that the Zoning Code for the
15 Commercial Zoning District calls for a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet and this lot is
16 36,892 square feet according to the plat. She stated that the proposed building has a footprint of
17 6,441 square feet with two levels,main and lower levels. She stated that a storm water drainage
18 easement also exists to the south and east that significantly reduces the useable area on this lot.
19 She reviewed the parking requirements noting that they are based on a gross floor area of 12,833
20 square feet and the Zoning Code requires one parking space for every 300 square feet, which for
21 this project equals 43 parking spaces. She indicated that the sketch plan has 35 parking spaces
22 planned, leaving a deficit of 8 parking spaces, which is the reason why Mr. Thompson, S & T
23 Development, submitted the application for a variance. She explained that the applicant argues
24 that other similar projects that he has constructed in Roseville and Vadnais Heights have
25 provided 8 parking spaces per unit and he reports that this number has been sufficient for the
26 tenant. She noted that Mr. Thompson also explained that Staff's calculations,while based on the
27 gross floor area,take into account the HVAC room,the stairway, restrooms or the elevator,
28 which are all areas that the applicant feels should not be included in the parking calculations.
29 She stated that when these facilities are removed from the calculation of the gross floor area of
30 the lower level, there is space for only two or three offices and the net floor area calculation
31 reduces the number needed for parking on this project from eight to three. She stated that Mr.
32 Thompson has assured Staff that this would adequately meet the parking needs of the tenants.
33
34 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that another issue associated with this vacant lot is the storm water pond
35 that is pre-existing and was constructed according to the specifications of the Rice Creek
36 Watershed District. She explained that this storm water pond accommodates the water run-off
37 from the Tires Plus site as well as any future development that might occur on the adjacent site.
38 She further explained that the pond is designed to slow water run-off and clean the storm water
39 before it is released from the pond. She stated that the storm water pond occupies approximately
40 one-third of the lot area further reducing the opportunity to provide the eight additional parking
41 spaces. She stated that Minnesota Statutes require that in order for a variance to be granted, strict
42 application of the provisions of the City's zoning ordinance would cause undue hardship and that
43 the hardship is unique to the property. She stated that Mr. Thompson feels that because the
44 storm water pond is located on site and occupies a large portion of the property that this situation
45 constitutes a unique hardship not created by the proposed project and that because of the storm
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21,2006
Page 4
1 water pond this project as well as others would find it difficult to provide adequate parking. She
2 stated that Staff received one phone call regarding this site. She stated that Staff is
3 recommending approval of the parking variance.
4
5 Brent Thompson, S & T Development, stated that the building is structured in a way where they
6 are creating a condominium within a building. He explained that they are creating four specific
7 office spaces as described by the ordinance. He further explained that they would be four
8 individual and independent 1400 sq foot pads for use by one occupant for each unit. He stated
9 that this project is similar to five other projects he has done in other Cities adding that they have
10 found that what they are creating is a project perfect for a situation that is moving from a high
11 end commercial use to a buffered commercial use. He stated that they are giving business
12 owners the opportunity to own their own business space versus having to purchase an entire
13 building. He stated that each section would have very specific parking needs and reviewed with
14 the Commission. He stated that this proposal fits the use of the site very well noting that this is a
15 site in transition. He stated that the proposed plan shows that the storm water pond meets and
16 accommodates the drainage requirements for both sites and assured the Commission that they are
17 making every effort to ensure that they do not do anything additional that would stress the use of
18 the pond.
19
20 Commissioner Jenson clarified that tenants would not have to drive through the residential areas
21 to get to the parking lot. Mr. Thompson confirmed stating that the tenants would access the
22 property from Silver Lake Road, similar to Tires Plus and reviewed the access points with the
23 Commission.
24
25 Commissioner Jenson clarified that this project is separate from the PUD for St. Anthony Village
26 and asked if the design of the building would be aesthetically similar. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated
27 that there is a Design Committee that has been working with Silver Lake Village adding that the
28 Committee would invite Mr. Thompson to meet with them to discuss the proposed design. She
29 noted that the applicant still has to submit their proposal for the landscaping design.
30
31 Chair Stromgren asked for an overview of the elevation of the buildings and a review of the site
32 plan. Mr. Thompson provided the Commission with a brief overview of the site plan.
33
34 Mr. Thompson provided the Commission with an example of the materials they are proposing to
35 use noting that it is an exact match to the materials used on the Tires Plus building. He assured
36 the Commission that it is their plan to keep with the rock-faced block theme in an effort to tie in
37 with the design of the Tires Plus building.
38
39 Vice Chair Hanson asked if the mechanicals would be visible from the roof. Mr. Thompson
40 stated that everything mechanical would be housed inside the building except for the condensers,
41 which would be located off the back of the building. He stated that each unit would have their
42 own utility and furnace structure housed within their unit space.
43
r
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21, 2006
Page 5
1 Vice Chair Hanson asked if S &T Development is the current owner of the property. Mr.
2 Thompson clarified that they are not the current owners but they have a written agreement with
3 the current owners.
4
5 Vice Chair Hanson asked what the square footage costs would be. Mr. Thompson stated that it
6 would be approximately $185.00 per square foot.
7
8 Vice Chair Hanson asked if there are any ADA requirements for elevator. Mr. Thompson stated
9 that there are no ADA requirements for an elevator. He assured the Commission that all access
10 doors would be ADA compliant adding that the only requirement was from the Fire Department
11 who asked for access to the lower level.
12
13 Chair Stromgren stated that his concern was with the building materials and the need to remain
14 consistent along the side of the building that is visible to the road. He expressed concerns
15 regarding the lap siding. Mr. Thompson stated that several of their projects utilize the lap siding
16 as a means of blending in with the residential homes in the area and reviewed the materials with
17 the Commission.
18
19 Roland Olson, 3820 McAllister Avenue Northeast, stated that he has lived in the apartment
20 building facing this property for over twenty years. He noted that he works in a neighboring
21 community as a Finance Director. He thanked Staff for notifying the renters about this hearing
22 noting that approximately 100 to 150 units would look out towards this particular development.
23 He stated that he is not opposed to the development but he is concerned that the proposed
24 building is not appropriate for the size the land. He reviewed the site plan and clarified his
25 understanding of the City Codes noting that if the project were a bit smaller in size there would
26 be no need for a parking variance. He shared his philosophies on granting a variance with the
27 Commission and expressed concerns that by granting this variance it could set a precedent for
28 future properties.
29
30 Mr. Olson referenced Chapter 1635.6 of the City Code and reviewed his understanding of the
31 criteria needed to establish undue hardships with the Commission. He stated that he was very
32 disturbed to see that there was nothing included in the site plan for a landscaping proposal. He
33 expressed concerns that all of the trees in this area could be removed noting that he does not see
34 where there is anything unique about this property or proposal that would create a hardship for
35 the developer. He questioned whether the owner created the circumstance that is creating the
36 need for the variance. He asked if there were any plans to create a buffer between the business
37 and residential areas.
38
39 Mr. Olson provided the Commission with pictorial examples of the area noting that there has
40 been little to no maintenance of the pond over the last year or two. He stated that he is very
41 concerned that this business would create more storm water runoff, which could become an issue
42 since the pond is already not maintained properly. He stated that the Commission has a very
43 tough decision to make and he acknowledged the need for the City to create a tax base noting that
44 he is not against the development but he would prefer to see it developed to the appropriate size
45 for the property.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21,2006
Page 6
1
2 Chair Stromgren closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m.
3
4 Commissioner Jensen noted on previous office projects—asked if have had discussions around
5 the layout of the floor pad and actual need with respect to utility rooms and occupant load.
6 Based on floor plans submitted there seems to be some relevance to the concern. Ms. Moore-
7 Sykes noted there have not been any discussions.
8
9 Commissioner Jenson clarified that in the past the City has used the gross square footage as the
10 starting point and asked if there is a basis that was used to determine the need of a variance, as it
11 relates to usage of the individual spaces.
12
13 Chair Stromgren clarified that the need for the variance is based on uniqueness of the site, storm
14 water issues, occupancy and use. He referenced the condition of the pond stating that Staff is
15 aware of some of the problems with the previous construction and it is his understanding that the
16 problems would be rectified with this project.
17
18 Ms. Moore-Sykes confirmed that the problems have been reviewed and discussed noting that it
19 appears to be a minimal issue. She stated that the owner has agreed to rectify the issues.
20
21 Commissioner Jensen stated that the site would have roughly the same character and would still
22 have significant size and parking issues. He asked if there has been any attempt at landscaping or
23 providing green space in the area. He suggested that landscaping be included for some of the
24 islands and open spaces or include some form of treescaping as a tradeoff.
25
26 Chair Stromgren noted that landscaping was included as a condition for the Tires Plus project.
27
28 Commissioner Jenson stated that there is a need for a landscaping concept review. Ms. Moore-
29 Sykes stated that a landscaping proposal has to be provided noting that this would be a perfect
30 opportunity to further enhance the landscape of the area.
31
32 Chair Stromgren agreed that if they slightly reduced the size of the building they wouldn't need
33 the variance adding that he would question what the end result would look like if the made them
34 do this. He stated that he would have to ask if it would change the nature of the business, which
35 in turn could change the traffic impact.
36
37 Commissioner Jenson stated that he did not think reducing the size of the building would change
38 the traffic impacts that much. He stated that it is his belief that the units would be occupied by
39 small businesses with a small'clientele base.
40
41 Vice Chair Hanson noted that the current owners created the situation with the storm water pond
42 adding that S &T Development is not the current owner. He expressed concerns stating that the
43 property does not meet the requirements for a building of this size. He stated that the building
44 could be smaller and put to a similar use.
45
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21, 2006
Page 7
1 Commissioner Jensen noted that there is a cross parking/cross easement as a part of this package
2 and asked if there is a similar agreement with Tires Plus. He noted that this could solve some of
3 the concerns around the additional twelve parking spaces. He asked if Tires Plus had over-
4 parked.
5
6 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that she did check the Tires Plus project file to see if they had applied
7 for a parking variance and found that they did not require a parking variance. She stated that she
8 and the applicant discussed the cross parking options noting that the applicant did not intend to
9 use that option because Tire Plus is a busy business.
10
11 Motion by Commissioner Jenson, second by Commissioner Hoska, to recommend approval of
12 the Parking Variance request for VSI Construction with the condition that landscaping plans are
13 submitted with the application. Recommend that the variance be granted due to undue hardship
14 of the existing site and note that the applicant did not create these hardships with respect to the
15 storm water ponds, which was required by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Motion carried 5-
16 1 (1 Nay-Vice Chair Hanson)
17
18 Motion carried 5-1 (1-Nay-Hanson)
19
20 VIII. CONCEPT REVIEW
21
22 8.1 Phase 11 of the Silver Lake Village Development—Pratt/Hunter Associates
23
24 This item was removed from the agenda.
25
26 IX. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION
27
28 9.1 Comprehensive Plan Task Force Update.
29
30 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Staff has received 13 applications from residents who have
31 expressed an interest in participating as members of the Comprehensive Plan Task Force
32 Committee. She stated membership would also include the Planning Commission members.
33 She stated that three consultants have submitted their proposals noting that interviews are
34 scheduled to begin on Monday, March 27, 2006. She stated that the consultants and residents
35 who have asked to be included on the Task Force will be announced by resolution at the April
36 11, 2006 City Council meeting.
37
38 9.2 2006 Land Use Planning Workshop
39
40 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that a list of dates for the 2006 Land Use Planning Workshop was
41 included in their meeting packets. She stated that anyone who is interested in attending should
42 contact her and she would help get them registered for the workshop.
43
44 X. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
45
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 21, 2006
Page 8
1 10.1 League of Minnesota Cities Handbook, Chapter 15 Planning and Zoning_ Chapter 16
2 Regulatory and Development Functions of the City.
3
4 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that she has included copies of the chapter updates for their review. The
5 handbook is available for anyone to review.
6
7 10.2 Draft of Proposed Smoking Ban in Cijy Parks
8
9 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Staff is currently researching how other Cities are handling this
10 issue noting that it could come before the Planning Commission as an ordinance change.
11
12 10.3 GTS Training Sessions in Planning
13
14 This item was removed from the agenda.
15
16 XI. ADJOURNMENT
17
18 Motion by Vice Chair Hanson, second by Commissioner Galyon,to adjourn the meeting at 8:22
19 p.m.
20
21 Motion carried unanimously,
22
23 Respectfully submitted,
24 Bonnie Sullivan
25 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
STAFF REPORT
To: Planning Commission Report No.: VII.1.
From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Assistant City Manager
Date: April 18, 2006
Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permit for a Tanning Salon—St. Anthony Shopping Center;
Requested Action: Concept Review
Property Address: 2922 Pentagon Drive
Zoning District: Commercial
60-Day Expires: June 13,2006
Background:
Ms. Deborah Tomberlin contacted Staff to discuss the City's ordinance regarding opening a tanning salon in the
St. Anthony Shopping Center. Body tanning salons are a permitted conditional use (Section 1635.03 (k)) and
Ms. Tomberlin indicated that she has a tentative rental agreement with Al Esther, one of the owners of the St.
Anthony Shopping Center. She is proposing to open the tanning salon in the end unit where Hansen's Gifts was
previously.
Staff provided Ms. Tomberlin with the City's requirements regarding a conditional use permit and a CUP
application. On Friday,April 14, 2006, Ms. Tomberlin submitted a completed application, fees and additional
information regarding her application.
Attachments:
• Copy of Application
• Propose Salon Layout
• Narrative of the Project
041806 Tanning Salon CUP request.doc
P
r
t
3301 Silver Lake Road •St.Anthony,MN 55418 • (p)612.782.3301 • (f)612.782.3302
www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
A. GENERAL DATA
NAME OF APPLICANT: D rol--\ AA.1& Ti'vp o4o TO-1l-,b,;Lb v" t,'
The above-named individual,firm or corporation hereby respectfully sub is the following data in support of the
preliminary information provided on the accompanying zoning application summary from dated t 'Of0for the
purpose of securing a Conditional Use
/Permit.
CONTACT PERSON:
Last NameFust Daytime Phone Number
((��
PROPERTY ADDRESS: _ A 1'-el a q d to 'Dr, 3—k 0+10
B. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. Specify the section of the ordinance which applies to this project
2. Brief narrative description of this request: TD carp_ E.r\ y 10 -- t 2 In p� -��,N�•��
3. Written justification for the request,includin discussion of how any potential conflicts with existing nearby
land uses will be minimized: '! (+a,,•� :'fes e C 'V%(A t, 0 y4-1 t -f.S
4. Check all additional supporting documents and data which are being submitted to help explain this project
proposal:
51relacrt, _ �c1i j �L�} •
❑ topographic map UU
!Tation plans
❑ engineering plans
❑landscaping plans
❑ elevations
I hereby certify with my signatAe that all data on m a plication forms�ans d s ecifications are true and correct to
the best of my knowledge: / s -�H I U
Signature of Applicant I Date
In accordance with 1665.04 of Chapter 16,Zoning and Land Use,the City of St.Anthony hereby ❑ approves,
❑ denies the foregoing application for a Conditional Use Permit. If approved,said approval is subject to the following
general and special provisions:
(continued on the next page)
F:\Planning\Forms\2005 CUP Application Informationdoc
04 -07-0G ;
r
1
Applicant Name for Conditional Use Permit
Timothy and Deborah Tomberlin
2705 Townview Ave.
St. Anthony, MN. 55418 ph. 612-788-9082
Owner's Name of rental property
Al Esther
St. Anthony Shopping Center, LLC
PO Box 555
Wayzata, MN. 55391 ph. 612-741-6469
Legal and street address of property.
2922 Pentagon Drive
St.Anthony, MN. 55418
Hi , My name is Debbe Tomberlin and I would very much like to open a tanning salon in
St.Anthony. Indoor tanning, for individuals who can tan, is an intelligent way to
minimize the risk of contracting sunburn while maximizing the enjoyment,beauty
and natural healthy glow of a tan. Indoor tanning nowa days called"smart tanning",
provides a controlled environment for a soft, gentle tan,with less UV exposure.
I will be proud to feature the best and latest in equipment from top U.S. manufacturers.
Because I will be an independent salon, I will be able to feature products from all the
leading lines. My aim is to provide St. Anthony with the most successful and pro-
gressive tanning salon to educate the customer through a knowledgeable staff, and
literature in a very Calcare Clean Certified, friendly and attractive environment.
My husband and I have lived in St.Anthony for six years and have two children ages
5 and 6. We want to bring a very much needed CLEAN tanning facility to St. Anthony
that will be owned and operated by St. Anthony folks. Thank you very much.
Tim and Debbe Tomberlin
rikt�-L`'p
10
SunStar 33 nStar 332 Solaris 336 (T
y Oni
N
12'2 6'6
Solaris 336 Solaris 336 Solaris 336 5W2V
L C9
11'8
`t SunStar 332
°' L-1-
Solaris 336 Solaris 336
SunStar 332
;-
L
�?N
SunStar 4M
b SolarForce 648 SolarForoe 648 aq
I
T6 T6 4' T
(YVN '5LI i
SunStar 432 This layout is provided as a
courtesy and is not an architectural
rendering suitable for use as plans
and specifications or for securing
permits of any kind. Neither ETS,
Inc.,nor any agent 4or employee
thereof,shag be responsible or
6) liable in any way for the
construction or set-up of the
project as shown in this layout,
Including but not limited to,the
material or labor supplied in
connection therewith,any errors,
Inconsistencies or other defects in
this layout,or any work done
4'10 according thereto.
BL821 AHS BA1972956
21'10 '
S , e
Ar �.
t ;
a
t
s
S
s
L
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
RESOLUTION 06-038
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE MEMBERS
TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN REVIEW TASK FORCE
WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the City to establish a task force for the
comprehensive land use plan review at the February 14,2006 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the following residents have expressed interest to participate in said Task Force:
Residents Planning Commission
Vernie Bjorklund Todd Hanson
Dennis Cavanaugh Jim Hoska
Jeff Fahrenholz Don Jensen
Jim Higgins Jan Jenson
Julianne Hunter Joel Stromgren
Peter LaBerge
Carole Lohmar
Robert Lohmar
Jim McNulty
George Rockwood
Mary Rockwood
Gary Shun
Staff Representative: Kim Moore-Sykes
Council Representatives: Randy Stille and Brian Thuesen
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony
hereby appoints the above-named persons as members to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Review Task Force.
Adopted this 11th day of Ate, 2006.
M yor
I certify that this is a true and accurate .
copy of the City of St. Anthony records.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Dat�IWe City-elerk
Reviewed for Administration: N I f r
City Manager
CITY OF ST.ANTHONY
RESOLUTION 06-039
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE BID TO ASSIST
THE CITY TO PREPARE
AN UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AS
REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, On September 12,2005 the City of St.Anthony received a letter from the
Metropolitan Council advising the'City is being required to submit a
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update,which also needs t
P o address issues as
identified by the Met Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework that may
impact the City's transportation,water resources management and d regional
parks plans;and
WHEREAS, Staff prepared and sent out eight Request for Proposals for the City of St.
Anthony's Comprehensive Plan Update,with three firms,Loucks Associates,
McCombs Frank Roos Associates,inc. and Toltz,King,Duvall and Anderson
(TKDA) responding with a proposal;and
WHEREAS, These three firms were invited to present their proposals and respond to
questions in a panel interview;and
WHEREAS, The panel considered the materials presented,the responses received from each
firm and each proposed budget;and
WHEREAS, The panel selected the firm of McCombs Frank Roos Associates,Inc to
recommend to the City Council as having the most comprehensive proposal,
demonstrating the most experience in working through the comprehensive plan
update process and having the most responsible bid of$44,410;and
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby
authorizes the hiring of the firm McCombs Frank Roos Associates,Inc.
to work with the Task Force and City Staff in the preparation and submission of
the City's Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council.
Adopted this 11th day of Ap,2006.
Mayor
[ certify that this is a true and accurate
ATTEST_: copy of the City of St. Anthony records,
City Clerk
11 u
Date City Jerk
Reviewed for administration:
City Manager