Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 11212006 Meeting Sheet IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII 104960 Box: 33 Folder: PL PACKETS 2005-2011 Document: PL PACKET 11212006 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 21, 2006 7:00 P.M. REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER. II. ROLL CALL. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. V. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17,, 2006 VI. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS. VIIA. 2008 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update VIII. CONCEPT REVIEWS. IX. REPORTS FROM STAFF. X. COMMUNITY FORUM. Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the podium, state their name and address for the Clerks record, and limit their remarks to five minutes The Planning Commission may refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. XI. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. XIA XII. ADJOURNMENT. FAPtanning\PC Agendas\2006\112106 R pc agenda.doc 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 4 5 October 17, 2006 6 7:00 p.m. 7 8 I. CALL TO ORDER. 9 Chair Stromgren called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 10 11 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 12 Chair Stromgren invited the Commissioners and audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 13 14 II. ROLL CALL. 15 16 Commissioners present: Chair Stromgren, Commissioners Galyon, Hanson, Hoska, Jensen, 17 Jenson, and Young. 18 19 Absent: None 20 21 Also present: Assistant City Manager Kim Moore-Sykes. 22 23 III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. 24 25 Motion by Commissioner Galyon, second by Commissioner Young to approve the meeting 26 agenda. 27 28 Motion carried unanimously. 29 30 IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19,2006. 31 32 Motion by Commissioner Hanson, second by Commissioner Jensen, to approve the Planning 33 Commission meeting minutes of September 19, 2006 as amended. 34 35 Motion carried unanimously. 36 37 V. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL. 38 A. Chair Stromgren stated he would attend the October 24, 2006 meeting. 39 40 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 41 42 A. Proposed Language Change to Chapter 14, Signs to allow Electronic Gas Price 43 Display Signs. 44 45 Chair Stromgren opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. 46 47 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes reported Mr. Roger Bona contacted Staff about the process 48 for submitting a request to install an electronic gas price sign. She stated Mr. Bona was informed Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 2 1 electronic signs were not permitted for any districts except signs located on property owned by 2 the City or Independent School District 282. She mentioned Mr. Bona informed Staff that 3 because gas prices are constantly changing, it was difficult at times to keep up with the 4 fluctuation. She stated Mr. Bona informed Staff the number signs become brittle and more 5 difficult to attach to the pylon sign during the winter, and using a ladder is dangerous. 6 7 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated Staff was asked to determine what other Minnesota 8 communities allowed electronic gas display signs. She reported that Shoreview,New Brighton, 9 Columbia Heights, and Watertown allow electronic gas display signs. Assistant City Manager 10 Moore-Sykes explained Coon Rapids allows changeable copy for illuminated signs and the City 11 of Bloomington is considering an ordinance that separates various types of electronic signs into 12 four categories to establish development standards unique to each sign type. 13 14 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated Staff is asking for a recommendation to the City 15 Council on whether to change the language to the City's sign ordinance regarding permitting 16 electronic gas price display signs. She explained because this not a change to the City's Zoning 17 Ordinance, City Council would need to hold three readings for the proposed language change. 18 19 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained the proposed language change would be to 20 Chapter 14 Ste, Sections 1400.0 and 1400.12. She read the recommended language for each 21 subdivision; 1400.07 Prohibited Signs, Subdivision 20, Electronic Message Signs would include 22 (2) Gas price display signs for fuel stations in the Commercial Zoning District. 23 24 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated under 1400.12 District Schedules, Subdivision 2, 25 Commercial and Limited Business (2), would included the following wording: "A gasoline 26 station will be allowed, in addition to all other authorized signs, one pylon sign to identify the 27 gasoline brand. This sign may not exceed 30 feet in height, and must have a minimum clearance 28 of eight feet from the basic grade level to the lowest element of the sign surface and may not 29 exceed 150 square feet in sign surface area. Such establishment will be allowed one changeable 30 price display sign for each frontage having a curb cut. That portion of the gas sign that 31 announces prices and consists of changeable copy, manual or electronic. A gas price display 32 must be integrated into a freestanding,pylon sign. Fuel stations may integrate a gas display sign 33 into an electronic changeable copy sign,provided: copy height shall not exceed 14.5 inches; the 34 electronic copy is limited to numeric characters only; the electronic copy shall not scroll, flash or 35 blink, or include animated copy of graphics;the electronic copy shall be limited to one color. 36 Such freestanding signs will be in addition to those signs allowed in paragraph one of this 37 Subdivision." 38 39 Mr. Tom Archambeau, St. Anthony Mobil Manager, commented the proposed changes are for 40 the purposes stated. He stated the volatility of gas prices require changes several times per week. 41 He commented that in the last few winters, a combination of rain, sleet, and snow created safety 42 issues for employees as they attempted to change the signs. 43 44 Commissioner Jenson asked Mr. Archambeau for the current gas price heights. 45 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 3 1 Mr. Archambeau replied he believed they were roughly 13 or 14 inches high. 2 3 Commissioner Jenson asked Mr. Archambeau if the proposed 14.5 inches would replicate what is 4 currently in place. 5 6 Mr. Archambeau replied the proposed sign would be no larger than the current sign. He 7 displayed a graphic of the proposed sign stating only two of the products carried would be 8 displayed; a smaller space for the sign may be required. He mentioned the current sign advertises 9 three products. 10 11 Commissioner Jensen asked Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes if what is proposed is that 12 okay the height be limited to the smaller of the two sizes displayed on the graphic; he did not see 13 the harm in having a 21-inch number if that is what has been submitted in the package. 14 15 Mr. Archambeau replied the upper portion of the sign is 21.5 inches; what is written in the packet 16 is that the numbers themselves could not be more than 14.5 inches in height. Mr. Archambeau 17 stated the way he interprets the display is the top portion of the sign would be 21.5 inches. He 18 stated he is not sure of the exact height of the digital display. 19 20 Chair Stromgren stated if it stays as written, Mobil would have the option of making it smaller or 21 adding the third product. 22 23 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated at the last meeting,the Commissioners talked about 24 the size and not wanting them more than 14.5 inch high. She mentioned this is the public 25 hearing for changes to the ordinance. She mentioned Council would hold three readings. 26 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated if the Commission wants to suggest a taller font size, 27 Staff could do that. 28 29 Chair Stromgren commented, based on his unscientific survey, the current size at the stations in 30 St Anthony seem to work fine. He stated electronic signs would be that much more obvious and 31 easer to read; the larger size would not be needed for slower speed streets. He stated that if they 32 were on an interstate, it would be different. 33 34 Commissioner Jensen stated the rewriting of the code applies only if the sign is on a pylon sign. 35 He explained a number of businesses have a monument signs and he did not see why the benefit 36 could not be carried over to the monument signs also. 37 38 Commissioner Galyon asked Commissioner Jensen if he was referring to only gas stations. 39 40 Commissioner Jensen stated what is often seen in a refurbished gas station is a sign incorporated 41 into a monument sign. He stated he did not see why it must state only a pylon sign or what harm 42 it would cause the community to include a monument sign. 43 44 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated the applicant had asked the pylon sign to become 45 electronic because it is the most difficult to reach manually. c Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 4 1 2 Chair Stromgren replied the current code is written for gas price signage to be on a pylon. He 3 stated Commissioner Jensen is correct in that a number of signs are monument style in and out of 4 the City. 5 6 Commissioner Jensen responded the Commission is attempting to update the code to deal with 7 current and future conditions. He stated during the reading process, he would like to insure 8 monument signs are included so another amendment would not be needed later. 9 10 Chair Stromgren reported receiving one email from Mr. Dennis Cavanaugh expressing his 11 concern about the impact an electronic sign would have on the neighborhood. 12 13 Chair Stromgren closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. 14 15 Commissioner Jensen remarked the Commission should deal with monument signs as well as 16 pylon signs for gas stations. He stated perhaps the proposal should be sent back to Staff to 17 include monument signs. 18 19 Chair Stromgren replied he is not sure if this is referenced in another subsection. 20 21 Commissioner Jensen responded he is offering an amendment to ensure changeable copy is 22 allowed regardless of the sign type and to continue the reading process forward. He stated he is 23 confident staff would find the correct wording. Commissioner Jensen recommended wording in 24 subdivision two of the amendment. 25 26 Chair Stromgren pointed out the first sentence where pylon is also referenced. 27 28 Commissioner Jensen recommended making a global change. 29 30 Commissioner Jenson asked if both monument and pylon signs are freestanding. He suggested 31 leaving the word freestanding to represent both monument and pylon signs. 32 33 Chair Stromgren replied monument and pylon signs are both defined in the beginning of Chapter 34 14. He state this would keep everything consistent and insure a reference is not missed. 35 Commissioner Jensen stated it is an attempt to make a copy change sooner than later rather than 36 in the middle of the winter. 37 38 Chair Stromgren stated he wants to make sure it remains monument or pylon so it could not 39 become attached to the building. He stated only one monument sign with the LED is allowed per 40 business. 41 42 Commissioner Jensen pointed out subdivision two mentions one sign only. He asked Assistant 43 City Manager Moore-Sykes if the Commission could forward this to the City Council along with 44 the friendly amendments and discussion. 45 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 5 1 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied it could be forwarded as Council would be doing 2 the readings and making revisions. She stated once approved and published it becomes the 3 ordinance. 4 5 Commissioner Hanson commented he sees cigarette prices being advertised along with the gas 6 prices and asked if there is any way to make sure that is not allowed. 7 8 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied the amendment could be made more specific in 9 1400.07, subdivision 20 by adding the word fuel. 10 11 Chair Stromgren stated LED comes in a range of colors, red being the cheapest. He asked if 12 there is a different impact on the neighborhood relative to colors. 13 14 Commissioner Hoska stated he has only seen the red ones and red is fine. 15 16 Commissioner Jensen responded what is proposed is one color; specify lumens or colors are not 17 addressed. He stated he is not sure the Commission could effectively predict what the correct 18 lumen should be. 19 20 Commissioner Galyon added if it were white it would be brighter than red, at night it could not 21 be dimmed and must it be on constantly. 22 Chair Stromgren clarified the lights would dim at night because a photocell would dim 23 automatically. 24 25 Commissioner Galyon stated it should be included in the recommendation. 26 27 Chair Stromgren replied it should be added that an automatic dimming feature to decrease 28 illumination levels at night must control electronic signs. 29 30 Commissioner Jenson asked if lumens should be specified for a.m. and p.m. He also asked what 31 `limited to one color' meant. He asked if it meant the first station to implement the LED signs 32 would set the precedence for the color used by other stations. 33 34 Chair Stromgren replied each station would be limited to the use of one color; multi colored 35 signs could not be used. 36 37 Commissioner Jensen interjected that what this implies is that each station could work with 38 individual corporate colors. 39 40 Commissioner Hanson asked about the reference to curb cuts in the amendment and asked if this 41 meant there could be more signs if there were more curb cuts. 42 43 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained that is how it is stated in the ordinance with the 44 exception of the words changeable and display. She pointed out in subdivision 2 (2), it states 45 they would be allowed one pylon sign. She clarified it meant the electronic sign could only be on Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 6 1 one pylon. She clarified further the station could have a monument sign for every right-of-way, 2 but only one pylon. 3 4 Chair Stromgren stated the last seven words should be taken out, add a period after `sign,' and 5 take out the reference to curb cut. He restated how the sentence should read. 6 7 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes summarized the recommended changes, additions, and 8 deletions under 1400.07 and 1400.12 for the Commissioners. She stated Staff would submit the 9 rewrite to the City Attorney to make sure it reads correctly. 10 11 Motion by Commissioner Jensen, seconded by Commissioner Hoska to recommend approval of 12 the proposed Language Change to Chapter 14, Signs to allow Electronic Gas Price Display Signs, 13 as amended and clarified by staff 14 15 Motion carried unanimously 16 17 Chair Stromgren stated this would be presented at the October 24, 2006 City Council meeting for 18 the first of three readings. 19 20 Chair Stromgren recommended Mr. Archambeau have someone from the Mobil station attend 21 the City Council meeting to answer questions. 22 23 VII. CONCEPT REVIEWS. 24 25 A. 3609 Downers Drive—Stoop Encroachment in Front Yard 26 27 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated Mr. Mark Shadduck contacted Staff for information 28 on removing and replacing his concrete driveway. She reported he asked what the process would 29 be if he wanted to expand and replace the front stoop and steps. Assistant City Manager Moore- 30 Sykes informed Mr. Shadduck he would need to determine how far from the front yard setback 31 the current stoop was and that the City ordinance did not allow an encroachment of a front stoop 32 by five feet. She reported Mr. Shadduck explained that widening the stoop an additional 12 33 inches would make it easier to assist an elderly parent into the home and reduce the unsafe 34 impact a drip line had on the front stoop, which caused an icy, slippery hazard in the winter. 35 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained the right-of-way is ten feet from the curb to the 36 lot line and the front yard setback, which is 30 feet from the lot line to the house, is a 37 measurement substantiated by a lot survey done in 1992 by Kemper Surveyors. She reported, 38 according to the property owner, the existing front stoop is approximately eight feet into the front 39 yard, three feet more than the City ordinance allows. Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes 40 stated the house was constructed in 1965, making the current front stoop grandfathered in. 41 42 Mr. Mark Shadduck, 3609 Downers Drive, appeared before the Commission to answer questions. 43 44 Chair Stromgren asked Mr. Shaddock if the existing stoop projected eight feet from the house 45 and was it connected to the home and on a foundation. r Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17,2006 Page 7 1 2 Mr. Shadduck replied only the upper part was on a foundation and the second section is falling 3 away from the house. 4 5 Chair Stromgren informed Mr. Shadduck the second section is considered a sidewalk, over 6 which the City does not cover in the city ordinances. He stated as long as the stoop connected to 7 the house and on a foundation is within the five-foot setback; Mr. Shadduck did not need to be 8 here. 9 10 Commissioner Jensen stated the elevation is not clear from the drawing. 11 12 Chair Stromgren replied there is nothing that says he could not have a stoop at the same level as 13 the sidewalk. He informed Mr. Shaddock he would need to comply with specific impervious lot 14 coverage. 15 16 Mr. Shadduck replied he would speak with Staff to make sure he is clear on the requirements. 17 18 Chair Stromgren stated as this is a concept review no action is required. 19 20 B. 2620 Kenzie Terrace—B'Yond Automotive 21 22 Mr. Josh Hamann addressed the Commission and summarized his proposal to open an auto 23 customizing shop. He stated he would be focusing on rims and tires, window tinting, alarm 24 systems and stereo systems. He assured the Commission no chemicals would be used or painting 25 done at the site. 26 27 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained Mr. Hamann contacted Staff inquiring about the 28 possibility of moving his business to 2620 Kenzie Terrace. She reported Mr. Hamann stated he 29 contacted the building owner, Ms. Theresa Hawk about the use of the vacant building. Assistant 30 City Manager Moore-Sykes suggested,based on the information provided by Mr. Hamann, that 31 his business was better suited for the Industrial Park. She stated Mr. Hamann reported he did not 32 use paints, lacquers, or polishes as part of his automotive customizing services and he did not 33 feel his business would be out of place adjacent to Brownie's Restaurant. She stated Mr. 34 Hamann did customizing and detailing, but mostly through an applique process. She reported he 35 also does customized tires, rims, auto interiors, stereo and speaker installation, and security 36 system installation. 37 38 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes informed the Commission the only automotive uses 39 permitted in a Commercial Zoning District are for auto accessory or parts stores. She stated auto 40 repair required a conditional use permit in the Commercial Zoning District. 41 42 Commissioner Hanson remarked he would be concerned with the noise for the neighborhood. 43 44 Mr. Hamann replied his business is located in a garage stall and all customizing would be done in 45 the bay. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 8 1 2 Commissioner Galyon asked Mr. Hamann to explain how the security system is tested after 3 installation. 4 5 Mr. Hamann replied he used a smaller alarm that is not very loud to test it. 6 7 Chair Stromgren asked Mr. Hamann if he mounted tires and rims. 8 9 Mr. Hamann replied he did but his business is geared more towards the audio. He stated tires 10 would be mounted manually without the use of pneumatic tools. 11 12 Commissioner Hanson asked Mr. Hamann if he would require outside storage for tires and rims. 13 14 Mr. Hamann replied if someone wanted tires or rims he would need to order through a 15 wholesaler, as he did not stock them. 16 17 Commissioner Jensen asked Mr. Hamann if there was a location in the Industrial Park for his 18 business. 19 20 Mr. Hamann replied Ms. Hawk approached him on using her location. He stated he is happy 21 with the current location. 22 23 Commissioner Jenson asked for the square footage of the building. 24 25 Mr. Hamann replied it was about 1300 square feet. 26 27 Commissioner Young asked Mr. Hamann if cars would be stored outside at night. 28 29 Mr. Hamann stated they would not take on that amount of inventory for liability purposes. 30 31 Chair Stromgren stated the only concern would be noise potential for the residents in the area. 32 33 Commissioner Hanson asked what the hours of operation would be. 34 35 Mr. Hamann explained the hours would be from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday 36 and possibly on Saturday from until 1:00 p.m. 37 38 Commissioner Jensen asked Staff if Mr. Hamann would need to apply for a Conditional Use 39 Permit(CUP) or could his business be permitted as applied. 40 41 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied it would be dependent upon the interpretation of 42 the ordinance, but since they are not doing any type of auto repair and it is a commercial district 43 he would be allowed there. 44 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 9 1 Commissioner Jenson read from the ordinance and stated Mr. Hamann's business falls within the 2 ordinance. He stated Mr. Hamann would need to apply for a Conditional Use Permit but there is 3 no reason he would not receive it. 4 5 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied her question was in interpreting the ordinance as to 6 whether or not he is allowed to operate in the Commercial Zoning District or did he require a 7 CUP. She stated she recommend Mr. Hamann come to the Commission for a concept review. 8 9 Chair Stromgren stated the changing of parts on site would be the deciding factor. 10 11 VIII. REPORTS FROM STAFF. 12 13 A. Comp Plan Task Force Update 14 15 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes reported the Comp Plan Task Force would hold the last 16 review meeting on October 18, 2006 from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. in Council chambers. She 17 mentioned everyone is welcome. She stated the topic would include transportation, water, and 18 parks. 19 20 Commissioner Hanson asked if there would be a public hearing or forum. 21 22 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied the Task Force would try to do a public forum the 23 first part of November with the public hearing continuing on the November 21, 2006. She stated 24 the information would be posted to the website. 25 26 IX. COMMUNITY FORUM. 27 None 28 29 X. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 30 31 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes informed the Commission there are seats open at the end of 32 the year on the Planning Commission and the Park Commission. She explained anyone wishing 33 to apply must do so by November 17, 2006. 34 35 XI. ADJOURNMENT. 36 37 Motion by Commissioner Hanson, second by Commissioner Galyon,to adjourn the meeting. 38 39 Chair Stromgren adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. 40 41 Motion carried unanimously. 42 43 Respectfully submitted, 44 Dianna Wise 45 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Q 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 4 5 October 17, 2006 6 7:00 p.m. 7 8 I. CALL TO ORDER. 9 Chair Stromgren called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 10 11 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 12 Chair Stromgren invited the Commissioners and audience to join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 13 14 II. ROLL CALL. 15 16 Commissioners present: Chair Stromgren, Commissioners Galyon, Hanson, Hoska, Jensen, 17 Jenson, and Young. 18 19 Absent: None 20 21 Also present: Assistant City Manager Kim Moore-Sykes. 22 23 III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. 24 25 Motion by Commissioner Galyon, second by Commissioner Young to approve the meeting 26 agenda. 27 28 Motion carried unanimously. 29 30 IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19,2006. 31 32 Motion by Commissioner Hanson, second by Commissioner Jensen, to approve the Planning 33 Commission meeting minutes of September 19, 2006 as amended. 34 35 Motion carried unanimously. 36 37 V. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL. 38 A. Chair Stromgren stated he would attend the October 24, 2006 meeting. 39 40 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 41 42 A. Proposed Language Change to Chapter 14, Signs to allow Electronic Gas Price 43 Display Signs. 44 45 Chair Stromgren opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. 46 47 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes reported Mr. Roger Bona contacted Staff about the process 48 for submitting a request to install an electronic gas price sign. She stated Mr. Bona was informed Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 2 1 electronic signs were not permitted for any districts except signs located on property owned by 2 the City or Independent School District 282. She mentioned Mr. Bona informed Staff that 3 because gas prices are constantly changing, it was difficult at times to keep up with the 4 fluctuation. She stated Mr. Bona informed Staff the number signs become brittle and more 5 difficult to attach to the pylon sign during the winter, and using a ladder is dangerous. 6 7 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated Staff was asked to determine what other Minnesota 8 communities allowed electronic gas display signs. She reported that Shoreview,New Brighton, 9 Columbia Heights, and Watertown allow electronic gas display signs. Assistant City Manager 10 Moore-Sykes explained Coon Rapids allows changeable copy for illuminated signs and the City 11 of Bloomington is considering an ordinance that separates various types of electronic signs into 12 four categories to establish development standards unique to each sign type. 13 14 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated Staff is asking for a recommendation to the City 15 Council on whether to change the language to the City's sign ordinance regarding permitting 16 electronic gas price display signs. She explained because this not a change to the City's Zoning 17 Ordinance, City Council would need to hold three readings for the proposed language change. 18 19 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained the proposed language change would be to 20 Chapter 14 Si ngis, Sections 1400.0 and 1400.12. She read the recommended language for each 21 subdivision; 1400.07 Prohibited Signs, Subdivision 20, Electronic Message Signs would include 22 (2) Gas price display signs for fuel stations in the Commercial Zoning District. 23 24 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated under 1400.12 District Schedules, Subdivision 2, 25 Commercial and Limited Business(2), would included the following wording: "A gasoline 26 station will be allowed, in addition to all other authorized signs, one pylon sign to identify the 27 gasoline brand. This sign may not exceed 30 feet in height, and must have a minimum clearance 28 of eight feet from the basic grade level to the lowest element of the sign surface and may not 29 exceed 150 square feet in sign surface area. Such establishment will be allowed one changeable 30 price display sign for each frontage having a curb cut. That portion of the gas sign that 31 announces prices and consists of changeable copy, manual or electronic. A gas price display 32 must be integrated into a freestanding,pylon sign. Fuel stations may integrate a gas display sign 33 into an electronic changeable copy sign,provided: copy height shall not exceed 14.5 inches; the 34 electronic copy is limited to numeric characters only; the electronic copy shall not scroll, flash or 35 blink, or include animated copy of graphics; the electronic copy shall be limited to one color. 36 Such freestanding signs will be in addition to those signs allowed in paragraph one of this 37 Subdivision." 38 39 Mr. Tom Archambeau, St. Anthony Mobil Manager, commented the proposed changes are for 40 the purposes stated. He stated the volatility of gas prices require changes several times per week. 41 He commented that in the last few winters, a combination of rain, sleet, and snow created safety 42 issues for employees as they attempted to change the signs. 43 44 Commissioner Jenson asked Mr. Archambeau for the current gas price heights. 45 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 3 1 Mr. Archambeau replied he believed they were roughly 13 or 14 inches high. 2 3 Commissioner Jenson asked Mr. Archambeau if thero os d 14.5 inches would p p e s o replicate what is 4 currently in place. 5 6 Mr. Archambeau replied the proposed sign would be no larger than the current sign. He 7 displayed a graphic of the proposed sign stating only two of the products carried would be 8 displayed; a smaller space for the sign may be required. He mentioned the current sign advertises 9 three products. 10 11 Commissioner Jensen asked Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes if what is proposed is that 12 okay the height be limited to the smaller of the two sizes displayed on the graphic; he did not see 13 the harm in having a 21-inch number if that is what has been submitted in the package. 14 15 Mr. Archambeau replied the upper portion of the sign is 21.5 inches; what is written in the packet 16 is that the numbers themselves could not be more than 14.5 inches in height. Mr. Archambeau 17 stated the way he interprets the display is the top portion of the sign would be 21.5 inches. He 18 stated he is not sure of the exact height of the digital display. 19 20 Chair Stromgren stated if it stays as written, Mobil would have the option of making it smaller or 21 adding the third product. 22 23 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated at the last meeting,the Commissioners talked about 24 the size and not wanting them more than 14.5 inch high. She mentioned this is the public 25 hearing for changes to the ordinance. She mentioned Council would hold three readings. 26 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated if the Commission wants to suggest a taller font size, 27 Staff could do that. 28 29 Chair Stromgren commented, based on his unscientific survey, the current size at the stations in 30 St Anthony seem to work fine. He stated electronic signs would be that much more obvious and 31 easer to read; the larger size would not be needed for slower speed streets. He stated that if they 32 were on an interstate, it would be different. 33 34 Commissioner Jensen stated the rewriting of the code applies only if the sign is on a pylon sign. 35 He explained a number of businesses have a monument signs and he did not see why the benefit 36 could not be carried over to the monument signs also. 37 38 Commissioner Galyon asked Commissioner Jensen if he was referring to only gas stations. 39 40 Commissioner Jensen stated what is often seen in a refurbished gas station is a sign incorporated 41 into a monument sign. He stated he did not see why it must state only a pylon sign or what harm 42 it would cause the community to include a monument sign. 43 44 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated the applicant had asked the pylon sign to become 45 electronic because it is the most difficult to reach manually. i Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 4 1 2 Chair Stromgren replied the current code is written for gas price signage to be on a pylon. He 3 stated Commissioner Jensen is correct in that a number of signs are monument style in and out of 4 the City. 5 6 Commissioner Jensen responded the Commission is attempting to update the code to deal with 7 current and future conditions. He stated during the reading process, he would like to insure 8 monument signs are included so another amendment would not be needed later. 9 10 Chair Stromgren reported receiving one email from Mr. Dennis Cavanaugh expressing his 11 concern about the impact an electronic sign would have on the neighborhood. 12 13 Chair Stromgren closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. 14 15 Commissioner Jensen remarked the Commission should deal with monument signs as well as 16 pylon signs for gas stations. He stated perhaps the proposal should be sent back to Staff to 17 include monument signs. 18 19 Chair Stromgren replied he is not sure if this is referenced in another subsection. 20 21 Commissioner Jensen responded he is offering an amendment to ensure changeable copy is 22 allowed regardless of the sign type and to continue the reading process forward. He stated he is 23 confident staff would find the correct wording. Commissioner Jensen recommended wording in 24 subdivision two of the amendment. 25 26 Chair Stromgren pointed out the first sentence where pylon is also referenced. 27 28 Commissioner Jensen recommended making a global change. 29 30 Commissioner Jenson asked if both monument and pylon signs are freestanding. He suggested 31 leaving the word freestanding to represent both monument and pylon signs. 32 33 Chair Stromgren replied monument and pylon signs are both defined in the beginning of Chapter 34 14. He state this would keep everything consistent and insure a reference is not missed. 35 Commissioner Jensen stated it is an attempt to make a copy change sooner than later rather than 36 in the middle of the winter. 37 38 Chair Stromgren stated he wants to make sure it remains monument or pylon so it could not 39 become attached to the building. He stated only one monument sign with the LED is allowed per 40 business. 41 42 Commissioner Jensen pointed out subdivision two mentions one sign only. He asked Assistant 43 City Manager Moore-Sykes if the Commission could forward this to the City Council along with 44 the friendly amendments and discussion. 45 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 5 1 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied it could be forwarded as Council would be doing 2 the readings and making revisions. She stated once approved and published it becomes the 3 ordinance. 4 5 Commissioner Hanson commented he sees cigarette prices being advertised along with the gas 6 prices and asked if there is any way to make sure that is not allowed. 7 8 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied the amendment could be made more specific in 9 1400.07, subdivision 20 by adding the word fuel. 10 11 Chair Stromgren stated LED comes in a range of colors, red being the cheapest. He asked if 12 there is a different impact on the neighborhood relative to colors. 13 14 Commissioner Hoska stated he has only seen the red ones and red is fine. 15 16 Commissioner Jensen responded what is proposed is one color; specify lumens or colors are not 17 addressed. He stated he is not sure the Commission could effectively predict what the correct 18 lumen should be. 19 20 Commissioner Galyon added if it were white it would be brighter than red, at night it could not 21 be dimmed and must it be on constantly. 22 Chair Stromgren clarified the lights would dim at night because a photocell would dim 23 automatically. 24 25 Commissioner Galyon stated it should be included in the recommendation. 26 27 Chair Stromgren replied it should be added that an automatic dimming feature to decrease 28 illumination levels at night must control electronic signs. 29 30 Commissioner Jenson asked if lumens should be specified for a.m. and p.m. He also asked what 31 `limited to one color' meant. He asked if it meant the first station to implement the LED signs 32 would set the precedence for the color used by other stations. 33 34 Chair Stromgren replied each station would be limited to the use of one color; multi colored 35 signs could not be used. 36 37 Commissioner Jensen interjected that what this implies is that each station could work with 38 individual corporate colors. 39 40 Commissioner Hanson asked about the reference to curb cuts in the amendment and asked if this 41 meant there could be more signs if there were more curb cuts. 42 43 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained that is how it is stated in the ordinance with the 44 exception of the words changeable and display. She pointed out in subdivision 2 (2), it states 45 they would be allowed one pylon sign. She clarified it meant the electronic sign could only be on Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 6 1 one pylon. She clarified further the station could have a monument sign for every right-of-way, 2 but only one pylon. 3 4 Chair Stromgren stated the last seven words should be taken out, add a period after `sign,' and 5 take out the reference to curb cut. He restated how the sentence should read. 6 7 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes summarized the recommended changes, additions, and 8 deletions under 1400.07 and 1400.12 for the Commissioners. She stated Staff would submit the 9 rewrite to the City Attorney to make sure it reads correctly. 10 11 Motion by Commissioner Jensen, seconded by Commissioner Hoska to recommend approval of 12 the proposed Language Change to Chapter 14, Signs to allow Electronic Gas Price Display Signs, 13 as amended and clarified by staff 14 15 Motion carried unanimously 16 17 Chair Stromgren stated this would be presented at the October 24, 2006 City Council meeting for 18 the first of three readings. 19 20 Chair Stromgren recommended Mr. Archambeau have someone from the Mobil station attend 21 the City Council meeting to answer questions. 22 23 VII. CONCEPT REVIEWS. 24 25 A. 3609 Downers Drive—Stoop Encroachment in Front Yard 26 27 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated Mr. Mark Shadduck contacted Staff for information 28 on removing and replacing his concrete driveway. She reported he asked what the process would 29 be if he wanted to expand and replace the front stoop and steps. Assistant City Manager Moore- 30 Sykes informed Mr. Shadduck he would need to determine how far from the front yard setback 31 the current stoop was and that the City ordinance did not allow an encroachment of a front stoop 32 by five feet. She reported Mr. Shadduck explained that widening the stoop an additional 12 33 inches would make it easier to assist an elderly parent into the home and reduce the unsafe 34 impact a drip line had on the front stoop, which caused an icy, slippery hazard in the winter. 35 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained the right-of-way is ten feet from the curb to the 36 lot line and the front yard setback, which is 30 feet from the lot line to the house, is a 37 measurement substantiated by a lot survey done in 1992 by Kemper Surveyors. She reported, 38 according to the property owner,the existing front stoop is approximately eight feet into the front 39 yard, three feet more than the City ordinance allows. Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes 40 stated the house was constructed in 1965, making the current front stoop grandfathered in. 41 42 Mr. Mark Shadduck, 3609 Downers Drive, appeared before the Commission to answer questions. 43 44 Chair Stromgren asked Mr. Shaddock if the existing stoop projected eight feet from the house 45 and was it connected to the home and on a foundation. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 7 1 2 Mr. Shadduck replied only the upper part was on a foundation and the second section is falling 3 away from the house. 4 5 Chair Stromgren informed Mr. Shadduck the second section is considered a sidewalk, over 6 which the City does not cover in the city ordinances. He stated as long as the stoop connected to 7 the house and on a foundation is within the five-foot setback; Mr. Shadduck did not need to be 8 here. 9 10 Commissioner Jensen stated the elevation is not clear from the drawing. 11 12 Chair Stromgren replied there is nothing that says he could not have a stoop at the same level as 13 the sidewalk. He informed Mr. Shaddock he would need to comply with specific impervious lot 14 coverage. 15 16 Mr. Shadduck replied he would speak with Staff to make sure he is clear on the requirements. 17 18 Chair Stromgren stated as this is a concept review no action is required. 19 20 B. 2620 Kenzie Terrace—B'Yond Automotive 21 22 Mr. Josh Hamann addressed the Commission and summarized his proposal to open an auto 23 customizing shop. He stated he would be focusing on rims and tires, window tinting, alarm 24 systems and stereo systems. He assured the Commission no chemicals would be used or painting 25 done at the site. 26 27 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained Mr. Hamann contacted Staff inquiring about the 28 possibility of moving his business to 2620 Kenzie Terrace. She reported Mr. Hamann stated he 29 contacted the building owner, Ms. Theresa Hawk about the use of the vacant building. Assistant 30 City Manager Moore-Sykes suggested, based on the information provided by Mr. Hamann, that 31 his business was better suited for the Industrial Park. She stated Mr. Hamann reported he did not 32 use paints, lacquers, or polishes as part of his automotive customizing services and he did not 33 feel his business would be out of place adjacent to Brownie's Restaurant. She stated Mr. 34 Hamann did customizing and detailing, but mostly through an applique process. She reported he 35 also does customized tires, rims, auto interiors, stereo and speaker installation, and security 36 system installation. 37 38 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes informed the Commission the only automotive uses 39 permitted in a Commercial Zoning District are for auto accessory or parts stores. She stated auto 40 repair required a conditional use permit in the Commercial Zoning District. 41 42 Commissioner Hanson remarked he would be concerned with the noise for the neighborhood. 43 44 Mr. Hamann replied his business is located in a garage stall and all customizing would be done in 45 the bay. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 8 1 2 Commissioner Galyon asked Mr. Hamann to explain how the security system is tested after 3 installation. 4 5 Mr. Hamann replied he used a smaller alarm that is not very loud to test it. 6 7 Chair Stromgren asked Mr. Hamann if he mounted tires and rims. 8 9 Mr. Hamann replied he did but his business is geared more towards the audio. He stated tires 10 would be mounted manually without the use of pneumatic tools. 11 12 Commissioner Hanson asked Mr. Hamann if he would require outside storage for tires and rims. 13 14 Mr. Hamann replied if someone wanted tires or rims he would need to order through a 15 wholesaler, as he did not stock them. 16 17 Commissioner Jensen asked Mr. Hamann if there was a location in the Industrial Park for his 18 business. 19 20 Mr. Hamann replied Ms. Hawk approached him on using her location. He stated he is happy 21 with the current location. 22 23 Commissioner Jenson asked for the square footage of the building. 24 25 Mr. Hamann replied it was about 1300 square feet. 26 27 Commissioner Young asked Mr. Hamann if cars would be stored outside at night. 28 29 Mr. Hamann stated they would not take on that amount of inventory for liability purposes. 30 31 Chair Stromgren stated the only concern would be noise potential for the residents in the area. 32 33 Commissioner Hanson asked what the hours of operation would be. 34 35 Mr. Hamann explained the hours would be from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday 36 and possibly on Saturday from until 1:00 p.m. 37 38 Commissioner Jensen asked Staff if Mr. Hamann would need to apply for a Conditional Use 39 Permit(CUP) or could his business be permitted as applied. 40 41 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied it would be dependent upon the interpretation of 42 the ordinance, but since they are not doing any type of auto repair and it is a commercial district 43 he would be allowed there. 44 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 17, 2006 Page 9 1 Commissioner Jenson read from the ordinance and stated Mr. Hamann's business falls within the 2 ordinance. He stated Mr. Hamann would need to apply for a Conditional Use Permit but there is 3 no reason he would not receive it. 4 5 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied her question was in interpreting the ordinance as to 6 whether or not he is allowed to operate in the Commercial Zoning District or did he require a 7 CUP. She stated she recommend Mr. Hamann come to the Commission for a concept review. 8 9 Chair Stromgren stated the changing of parts on site would be the deciding factor. 10 11 VIII. REPORTS FROM STAFF. 12 13 A. Comp Plan Task Force Update 14 15 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes reported the Comp Plan Task Force would hold the last 16 review meeting on October 18, 2006 from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. in Council chambers. She 17 mentioned everyone is welcome. She stated the topic would include transportation, water, and 18 parks. 19 20 Commissioner Hanson asked if there would be a public hearing or forum. 21 22 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied the Task Force would try to do a public forum the 23 first part of November with the public hearing continuing on the November 21, 2006. She stated 24 the information would be posted to the website. 25 26 IX. COMMUNITY FORUM. 27 None 28 29 X. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 30 31 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes informed the Commission there are seats open at the end of 32 the year on the Planning Commission and the Park Commission. She explained anyone wishing 33 to apply must do so by November 17, 2006. 34 35 XI. ADJOURNMENT. 36 37 Motion by Commissioner Hanson, second by Commissioner Galyon,to adjourn the meeting. 38 39 Chair Stromgren adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. 40 41 Motion carried unanimously. 42 43 Respectfully submitted, 44 Dianna Wise 45 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report No.: VII.1 From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Assistant City Manager Date: November 21, 2006 Subject: 2008 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update Requested Action: Public Hearing on 2008 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update for Submittal to the Adjacent Communities, Other Governmental Agencies and the Metropolitan Council Date Application Received: N/A Property Address: N/A Zoning District: N/A 60-Day Expires: N/A Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent; X No Background: In 1979, the City completed its first Comprehensive Land Use Plan and used it in planning its development for twenty years. During the 1990s, the Minnesota State Legislature passed legislation that required municipalities to do or redo their Comp Plans,with updates to be done every ten years. The City of St. Anthony completed its updated comp plan in 1998. In 2006, the City began planning for the Comprehensive Plan Update it would be required to complete by 2008. William Weber,A.I.C.P.,McCombs Frank Roos and Associates was selected through an RFP process to facilitate and complete the update project. Staff also advertised for task force members and initially received twelve letters of interest from residents of the community. Also included as members on the task force were Councilmembers Randy Stille and Brian Thuesen; Chair of the Planning Commission,Joel Stromgren and Vice Chair Todd Hanson; ISD 281 Superintendent Rod Thompson;Steve Hobbs, Rice Creek Watershed District and Dan Kalmon,Middle Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. The Task Force first met in May and continued meeting throughout the summer,reviewing land use and development issues within the City,working with Mr. Weber to complete Comp Plan Update. On November 8, the City held an open house,which provided the community an opportunity to review the proposed draft of Comp Plan Update. The Public Hearing is a formal review of the draft by the public, the Planning Commission and the City Council in preparation of submitting it to the surrounding cities, the school district, the watershed organizations and counties fox review and comment. These agencies have up to six months for this review and once that review period has expired, then the City is required to submit the draft Update with comments to the Metropolitan Council for its 120-day review period. Mr. Weber will be presenting a PowerPoint presentation on the Comp Plan. 112106 PH On 2008 Comp Plan.doc Attachments: • City of St.Anthony Comprehensive Plan Update 2008 • November 10, 2006 Memo from Bill Weber • Resolution Approving the Submittal of the Draft Comp Plan Update to Adjacent Cities, School District, Watersheds and Counties 112106 PH On 2008 Comp Plan.doc Engineering • Planning • Surveying FR MCCamks frank A "Sociales.Inc. DATE: 10 November 2006 TO: Members of the St. Anthony Planning Commission FROM: William Weber,AICP Comprehensive Planning Consultant SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Review We have worked since May with the Citizens Advisory Commission appointed by the City Council to draft an updated comprehensive plan for the City. Copies of the plan have been posted on the City's Website, and a public"open house"on the plan was held on Wednesday,November 8. The next steps in the formal approval process are: 1. Planning Commission: Informal review and comment. 2. City Council: Informal review and comment. Resolution approving distribution of the plan to adjacent and affected units of government. 3. Adjacent Cities,the School District,Watersheds and Counties: Formal review and comment. Up to six months. 4. Planning Commission: Formal approval of the plan. 5. City Council: Preliminary approval of the plan subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. Authorizes submittal of the plan to the Metropolitan Council. 6. Metropolitan Council: The Metropolitan Council has 120 days to review the plan for consistency with its regional system plans. 7. City Council: Formal adoption of the plan, assuming prior approval from the Metropolitan Council. I call you attention to page 2-18 through 2-24,which describe the proposed changes to the Land Use Plan as it pertains to the Kenzie Terrace District. This is the only notable issue in the plan, in my opinion. I will be in attendance at your meeting on November 21 to summarize the process and the plan,and to answer questions. 14800 28th Avenue North•Suite 140•Plymouth, Minnesota•55447 phone 763/476-6010 • fax 763/476-8532 E-mail:mfra@mfra.com ST. ANTHONY CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY THIRD QUARTER 2006 CASE# DATE VIOLATION ADDRESS COMPLAINT OFFICER STATUS 85 7/6/2006 3929 Fordham LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 86 7/10/2006 2705 31st BOAT IN STREET RL CLOSED 87 7/10/2006 3535 Silver Lake Rd VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 88 7/10/2006 3302 39th REFUSE IN FRONT YARD_ RL CLOSED 89 7/17/2006 3121 39th REFUSE IN FRONT YARD RL CLOSED 90 7/17/2006 3112 ROOSEVELT GARBAGE CAN LEFT OUT RL CLOSED 91 7/17/2006 3120 ROOSEVELT GARBAGE CAN LEFT OUT RL CLOSED 92 7/17/2006 3920 MACALASTER BRUSH IN R.O.W. RL CLOSED 93 7/17/2006 280136th AVE. GARBAGE CAN LEFT OUT RL CLOSED 94 7/24/2006 3309 CROFT VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 95 7/24/2006 3605 STINSON LONG GRASS RL 96 7/24/2006 2409 ST.ANTHONY BLV. LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 97 7/24/2006 2813 COOLIDGE VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 98 7/27/2006 2654 KENZIE WEEDS RL CLOSED 99 7/27/2006 MARKET PLACE WEEDS RL CLOSED 100 7/27/2006 3259 STINSON DEBRIS IN YARD RL CLOSED 101 8/2/2006 2508 30th Ave. DEBRIS IN YARD RL CLOSED 102 8/9/2006 2809 SILVER LANE NOISE VIOLATION RL CLOSED 103 8/9/2006 3225 SKYCROFT NOISE VIOLATION RL CLOSED 104 8/9/2006 3629 ROOSEVELT VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 105 8/9/2006 3501 BELDON VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 106, 8/9/2006 3201SILVER LAKE Rd. LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 107 8/9/2006 3201 STINSON LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 108 8/14/2006 2409 ST.ANTHONY BLV. LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 109 8/14/2006 3606 ROOSEVLT VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 110 8/14/2006 AREA SIGN ENFORCEMENT RL CLOSED 111 8/14/2006 4021 FORDHAM VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 112 8/21/2006 2812 ANTHONY LANE S. GARBAGE RL CLOSED 113 8/21/2006 3317 EDGEMERE LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 114 8/21/2006 3721 CHANDLER DR. LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 115 8/28/2006 3016 OLD 8 VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 116 8/28/2006 3042 OLD 8 LONG GRASS/ADDRESS RL CLOSED 117 8/28/2006 3004 31st Ave. VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 118 8/28/2006 3613 COOLIDGE GARBAGE CAN LEFT OUT RL CLOSED 119 8/28/2006 3605 STINSON LONG GRASS/DEBRIS RL 120 9/5/2006 3904 MACALASTER RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE RL 121 9/5/2006 3300 39TH VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 122 9/5/2006 3600 EDWARD GRASS CLIPPINGS IN STREET RL CLOSED 123 9/5/2006 3503 EDWARD GRASS CLIPPINGS IN STREET RL CLOSED 124 9/5/2006 3021 31stAve' GRASS CLIPPINGS IN STREET RL CLOSED 125 9/7/2006 3524 SILVER LAKE RD. GRASS CLIPPINGS IN STREET RL CLOSED 126 9/7/2006 2513 ST.ANTHONY BLV. LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 127 9/11/2006 2601 37TH GARBAGE CAN LEFT OUT RL CLOSED 128 9/11/2006 3636 PENROD FENCE DISPUTE RL CLOSED 129 9/11/2006 3509 MAPLEWOOD LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 130 9/11/2006 3141 STINSON BLV. SIGN ENFORCEMENT RL CLOSED 131 9/11/2006 2705 32ND LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 132 9/14/2006 3504 BELDON GRASS CLIPPINGS IN STREET RL CLOSED 133 9/14/2006 2812 34TH VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 134 9/14/2006 3211 Stinson BIv. LONG GRASS RL 135 9/21/2006 3657 SILVER LAKE RD. SIGN ENFORCEMENT RL CLOSED 136 9/21/2006 3629 ROOSEVELT VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 137 9/21/2006 3015 39th Ave. LONG GRASS RL CLOSED 138 9/21/2006 3404 CROFT VEHICLES ON GRASS RL CLOSED 139 9/21/2006 3149 STINSON GARBAGE LEFT OUT RL CLOSED 140 9/21/2006 36TH&SILVER LAKE RD. TREE IN R.O.W RL CLOSED 141 9/28/2006 3900 CHANDLER FENCE IN DISREPAIR RL CLOSED 142 9/28/2006 3108 ARMOR TERR. DEBRIS IN YARD RL CLOSED 143 9/28/2006 3512 32ND WATER DRAINAGE RL CLOSED 144 9/28/2006 2850 ANTHONY LANE S. PARKING LOT PAVEMENT RL 145 146 147 148 149 150