Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPL PACKET 10182011 Meeting Sheet IIIIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII 104993 Box: 33 Folder: PL PACKETS 2005-2011 Document: PL PACKET 10182011 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2011 6:00 P.M. WORK SESSION MEETING REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER. II. ROLL CALL. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. V. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 VI. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS. VII.1. 2824—2828 ANTHONY LANES — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT VII.2. CHANDLER PLACE — ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE INTO FRONT YARD VII.3. 3205-36TH AVENUE NE - GARAGE SETBACK PERMIT VII.4. 3219 STINSON BOULEVARD — GARAGE VARIANCE AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE VIII. CONCEPT REVIEWS. IX. OTHER BUSINESS. IX.1. ST. ANTHONY SHOPPING CENTER IX.2. LANG-NELSON AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT X. REPORTS FROM STAFF. XI. COMMUNITY FORUM. Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the fonn at the podium,state their name and address for the Clerk's record,and limit their remarks to five minutes fie Planning Commission may refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. XIII. ADJOURNMENT. FAPIanning Commission\2011\10\10182011 pc agenda.doc I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 2 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 4 5 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 6 7:00 p.m. 7 8 I. CALL TO ORDER. 9 10 Chair Jensen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 11 12 II. ROLL CALL. 13 14 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Jensen; Commissioners Cincoski, Heinis, and Poucher. 15 Absent: Commissioners Chaput, Crone, and Niccum. 16 Also Present: Assistant City Manager Kim Moore-Sykes. 17 18 III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 19 20 Chair Jensen invited the Commission and the audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 21 22 IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. 23 24 Chair Jensen noted the addition of agenda item VIII.5. (Concept Review—Kim and Don 25 Pavelka, 3205 36`h Avenue NE). 26 27 Motion by Commissioner Cincoski, second by Commissioner Heinis, to approve the meeting 28 agenda of September 20, 2011, as amended. 29 30 Motion carried 4-0. 31 32 V. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES. 33 34 Motion by Commissioner Cincoski, second by Commissioner Heinis, to approve the August 16, 35 2011, Meeting Minutes. 36 37 Motion carried 4-0. 38 39 VI. COMMUNICATION WITH CITY COUNCIL. 40 41 Commissioner Heinis stated that he will plan to attend the September 27, 2011, City Council 42 meeting. Chair Jensen also agreed to attend if necessary. 43 44 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 45 46 1. SIGN PLAN AMENDMENT(AND SITE PLAN UPDATE)—2912 PENTAGON 47 DRIVE, ST. ANTHONY SHOPPING CENTER 48 49 Chair Jensen opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 20, 2011 Page 2 1 2 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes presented the staff report. 3 4 Chair Jensen explained that this matter is a public hearing because the request is an amendment 5 to the existing sign plan for the shopping center. He asked if the proposed amendment represents 6 an increase to the overall square footage allowed for the sign area. 7 8 Mr. Greg Kozulla, Kozulla&Associates appeared before the Planning Commission and stated 9 that the proposed sign plan requests an increase from two to three square feet per linear foot of 10 frontage. He added that all existing signage conforms to the 2SF of sign area per lineal foot of 11 frontage and they would like the opportunity in the future to have a larger sign if requested by a 12 tenant. He noted that any proposed signage would have to be submitted to the owner prior to the 13 City and any proposed signage that extends above the parapet or beyond the building would not 14 be approved. He stated that he is not aware of any tenants that are going to replace their existing 15 signage. He added that the project will be competitively bid next week and construction would 16 begin in mid-October. 17 18 Chair Jensen requested that Mr. Kozulla prepare a rendering of the project that depicts the 19 current size of the signage as well as a rendering that depicts the requested 3SF of sign area per 20 linear foot. He stated this would be helpful for the City Council and serve as a point of reference 21 to see the maximum size of signage that would be allowed on the site. 22 23 Chair Jensen closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. 24 25 Motion by Commissioner Poucher, second by Commissioner Cincoski, to recommend that the 26 City Council approve the Comprehensive Sign Plan amendment for the St. Anthony Village 27 Shopping Center as submitted. 28 29 Motion carried 4-0. 30 31 Chair Jensen stated that this item will be considered by the City Council at its September 27, 32 2011, regular meeting. 33 34 2. ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE FOR FRONT PORCH— 3408 MAPLEWOOD 35 DRIVE 36 37 Chair Jensen opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. 38 39 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes presented the staff report. 40 41 Ms. Corri Sandwick, Albertsson Hansen Architecture, Ltd., appeared before the Planning 42 Commission on behalf of Cully and Barbara Johnson, the property owners. She advised that Mr. 43 and Mrs. Johnson are requesting an increase in the front yard encroachment from 5' to 7'-9-1/2" 44 to construct a porch on the front of their home. She stated that the porch will include a front 45 stoop and steps to the porch which will extend another five feet into the front yard setback and 46 the stoop and steps are necessary to enter and exit the porch. She indicated that the porch will Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 20,2011 Page 3 1 enhance the property's curb appeal, increase use of the front yard, and foster neighborhood 2 communications. She stated that the setback of the house was determined by using the two 3 houses adjacent to the property which is 33.4' from the front property line, behind the front 4 fagade of the garage. She added the proposed variance is in the spirit of the ordinance and will 5 not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 6 7 Chair Jensen closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. 8 9 Chair Jensen requested clarification regarding the actual front yard setback and asked if the 10 setback is 30' or a blend of the two properties next door. 11 12 Ms. Sandwick replied that the setback is 30' or an average of the two adjacent front yards, 13 whichever is greater, so it is 33.4'. 14 15 Chair Jensen noted that with a 30' setback, if this were a new structure and the first one on the 16 block, the property owners would not need a variance. He requested that the property owners 17 confirm the surveyor dimensions. 18 19 Motion by Commissioner Heinis, second by Commissioner Cincoski,to recommend that the City 20 Council approve an encroachment variance of 2' 10" from the front yard setback requirements. 21 22 Motion carried 4-0. 23 24 3. GARAGE SETBACK PERMIT—2610—30TH AVENUE NE 25 26 Chair Jensen opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. 27 28 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes presented the staff report and noted that the City received 29 one letter against the proposed plan; this letter is included in the record. 30 31 Mr. Glenn Bergum, 2610 301h Avenue NE, appeared before the Planning Commission and 32 requested several corrections to the August 16, 2011, Planning Commission meeting minutes. 33 He requested that the second paragraph on page 5 be revised to state "Traci and Glenn Bergum, 34 2610 301h Avenue NE, appeared before the Planning Commission and Ms. Bergum presented 35 several photographs of improvements done to their home since they purchased it in 1993." He 36 also requested that lines 25 and 30 be revised to accurately reflect their contractor's name as 37 Mark Van Patter of MVP Construction. He stated that the City's basic objection to the requested 38 variance is that the proposed 768 square foot garage results in lot coverage of 37.5%. He 39 questioned how the City defines the essential character of the neighborhood and stated the 40 proposed garage mimics the existing architecture of the house better than the existing garage. He 41 indicated the current garage has a fairly flat pitch and the proposed garage will have a 10 and 12 42 pitch, mimicking the house's 9 and 12 pitch. He explained that the proposed garage will have a 43 staircase leading to the bonus room upstairs with a mini dormer, which will also mimic the 44 architecture of the existing home and is similar to other homes in St. Anthony with dormers. He 45 presented a photograph of the rear yard area and explained that the existing property line fence is 46 only about 2' or less to the existing garage and this will be moved out to 5', which will allow this Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 20, 2011 Page 4 1 area to be landscaped in a manner more befitting properties in the City. He indicated that their 2 neighbors recently built a garage approximately 20-22' wide and felt that their proposed garage 3 is not grossly oversized compared to neighboring garages and is not out of line with the essential 4 character of the neighborhood. He added that the existing sidewalk will be torn out which will 5 allow more green space in this area. 6 7 Chair Jensen closed the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. 8 9 Commissioner Heinis asked if there will be any difference in height between the current garage 10 and the proposed garage. He also asked if the Bergum's yard drains into the neighbor's property. 11 12 Mr. Mark Van Patter,MVP Construction, stated that the new garage will be 20-21' high and they 13 plan to add one course of block to the slab. He stated that there is a swale between the driveways 14 and the area is fairly flat. 15 16 Commissioner Heinis asked if the lot coverage limitation includes the driveway. 17 18 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied that the site plan shows removal of the concrete 19 sidewalk and replacing it with pervious pavers and this was not included in the calculations for 20 lot coverage. 21 22 Chair Jensen stated that the dilemma in evaluating this request is that there is nothing to show the 23 existing impervious surface coverage and the proposed lot coverage is more than the 35% 24 limitation. He indicated that he would like to see the applicant come up with a summary of the 25 impervious surface calculation existing today, because whichever size garage is chosen, there 26 can be no greater than 35% impervious surface coverage. He stated that if the goal is to 27 minimize the number of variance requests, the applicant might consider using more pervious 28 pavers in the driveway area. He added that it may be helpful to table action on this item to allow 29 the applicant to work on the lot coverage calculations. 30 31 Motion by Commissioner Heinis, second by Commissioner Cincoski,to recommend that the City 32 Council approve a variance request to build a 768 SF garage and approve the rear yard setback 33 variance. 34 35 Chair Jensen suggested a friendly amendment to approve the variance requests contingent upon 36 the applicant reducing the impervious surface area of the lot, consistent with the City's lot 37 coverage limitation of 35%. 38 39 Commissioner Heinis approved the friendly amendment. 40 41 Commissioner Cincoski seconded the friendly amendment. 42 Motion carried 4-0. 43 44 45 46 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 20,2011 Page 5 1 VIII. CONCEPT REVIEWS. 2 3 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT—2824 AND 2828 ANTHONY LANE S. 4 5 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes presented the staff report and stated that she spoke with the 6 Fire Marshal earlier today and he advised that the building is mostly sprinklered, but some areas 7 where there are offices may need to have alarms installed. 8 9 Mr. Tom Baker, KW Commercial, appeared before the Planning Commission representing the 10 prospective buyer of the property. He stated that the property is being purchased to use as a 11 church and meeting hall and will be limited to 170 occupants. He noted that the University of 12 Minnesota will be displaced because the building will be used for religious purposes. 13 14 Commissioner Cincoski requested information regarding emergency exits. 15 16 Mr. Baker stated that this would be addressed at the time of building permit application. He 17 added that the building is sprinklered and some sprinkler heads may need to be relocated to meet 18 Code. He explained that they will have 75 parking stalls based on 170 occupants. 19 20 Chair Jensen requested that staff verify compliance with City Code with respect to parking 21 requirements. 22 23 Mr. Jeff Young, current owner of the property, requested that the record reflect the correct 24 address of the property as 2824 and 2828 Anthony Lane. 25 26 Commissioner Poucher asked if the change in use will change the property tax status for this 27 property. 28 29 Chair Jensen requested that staff clarify the property tax status for this property. 30 31 2. 3219 STINSON BOULEVARD—GARAGE VARIANCE AND LOT COVERAGE 32 VARIANCE 33 34 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes Kim presented the staff report. She discussed the site plan 35 found in the City's file containing the building inspector's earlier note regarding the property and 36 the notations from the previous owner of the property. 37 38 Ms. Rachel Sanzone, 3219 Stinson Boulevard, appeared before the Planning Commission and 39 stated that the goal is to rebuild the garage that existed when she purchased the property. She 40 noted that the play arbor shown on the site plan has been removed. 41 42 Chair Jensen stated that he would like to hear from the building official regarding the current 43 status of this property and the issues associated with the previous garage. He indicated if the 44 building permit was closed out, this matter exists outside the Planning Commission process. He 45 added there is not much for the Planning Commission to comment on at this stage with so much Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 20, 2011 Page 6 1 uncertainty regarding the property's history and requested that staff work with the building 2 official to determine next steps. 3 4 3. LA NEL ASSISTED LIVING— SITE REVIEW 5 6 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes presented the staff report. 7 8 Mr. Greg Bronk, President of LaNel Financial, appeared before the Planning Commission and 9 introduced Jay Nelson, architect, and Frank Lang and Gene Nelson(Lang-Nelson). He stated 10 that they have enjoyed a good relationship with the City and are now proposing to build a 72-unit 11 assisted living facility adjacent to the Autumn Woods apartments. He added they see an 12 immediate use within the campus to provide additional housing for residents in an assisted living 13 facility and would like to proceed with construction this year. 14 15 Mr. Nelson presented images of the proposed building and stated that the site plan is largely 16 similar to its previous arrangement on the site. He stated that parking will be available along the 17 side and they will be making application to the County to allow parking along the street, similar 18 to the parking allowed further up the street, and they believe this will help promote this as a 19 growing urban area. He indicated that water retention has been a big interest on the site and they 20 plan to provide rain gardens around the perimeter of the site. 21 22 Commissioner Cincoski asked about staff parking availability. 23 24 Mr. Nelson explained that the current lots are underused and they plan to make use of those lots 25 for staff. 26 27 Mr. Bronk indicated that in other communities of this size,there is a staff requirement of 26 28 people at different times throughout the day. He stated that there are 59 parking spaces available 29 at Autumn Woods, together with the underground parking and in front of the entrance, there will 30 be a total of 82 parking stalls available. He added that an indentation is planned on Kenzie 31 Terrace with parking available on the street. He advised that they do not currently see a need to 32 purchase additional land for the development. 33 34 4. CHANDLER PLACE—ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE INTO FRONT YARD OF 35 PORTE-COCHERE 36 37 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes presented the staff report. 38 39 Mr. Alan Plutowski, Trossen Wright Plutowski Architects,PA, appeared before the Planning 40 Commission and explained that Chandler Place is an independent and assisted living facility with 41 a memory care component as well as a skilled nursing facility. He stated that as you drive into 42 the facility, there is currently a 24' drive with a drop-off area containing a pitched roof vestibule 43 enclosure that encroaches into the current setback. He indicated that the main reason for 44 constructing the porte-cochere is to provide better safety for residents because the slope of the 45 drive is steep and unprotected. He advised that they have narrowed the drive slightly in order to 46 get the column structure for the canopy which will create a one-way situation where people can Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 20, 2011 Page 7 1 park and drop-off residents,will provide more room, and will allow passage of another car 2 alongside when another car is helping a resident. He presented architectural drawings of the 3 proposed porte-cochere and stated the porte-cochere would match the building,provide more 4 defused lighting, and create a more welcoming entrance that provides safety to residents. He 5 indicated this would be a permanent structure and would allow clearance of 14' to allow fire 6 truck access. He added that they intend to complete a survey of the area prior to proceeding with 7 construction. 8 9 Chair Jensen asked if they have been able to have a porte-cochere that close to the right-of-way 10 in other locations. He also asked if they have considered using heated pavement in the drop-off 11 area. 12 13 Mr. Plutowski replied that they completed a similar project four years ago in Montana. He also 14 stated that they have not discussed using heated pavement but would consider it particularly if 15 they cannot solve the grade issue. 16 17 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated that she spoke with the Fire Marshal and he 18 expressed concern about the height and whether they would be able to get a fire truck under the 19 structure. She added that the Fire Marshal has considered striping and signing the west side of 20 the island as a fire lane to keep traffic out. 21 22 Commissioner Cincoski felt that the porte-cochere is aesthetically very attractive. 23 24 5. KIM AND DON PAVELKA—3205 36'" AVENUE NE 25 26 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes advised that she met with Kim Pavelka who provided a 27 sketch of the proposed garage addition. She stated that the property meets the 15' total side yard 28 setback requirements and the property owners are proposing to build a 6' x 22' addition, 29 increasing the footprint to 1,128 SF and leaving them with lot coverage of 12%. She explained 30 that they would need a garage setback permit because they propose to build into the setback on 31 the side yard. 32 33 Mr. Don Pavelka, 3205 36`h Avenue NE, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated 34 that they would like to increase the size of the garage to accommodate two cars. 35 36 Chair Jensen indicated that the encroachment for eaves is 30" and the sketch has an overhang at 37 2' off the side of the building or 3' from the lot line, so that eave should be 6"rather than two 38 feet in order to not require another variance, which is desirable. He stated that at the time of the 39 variance request, the property owner should include a survey. He added that it would also be 40 helpful to ask the surveyors to dimension to the property's structure edge and include dimensions 41 both from the property's structure and the neighbor's structure. He requested that the drawing 42 also clarify whether the driveway area will be increased and to include a drawing of the front of 43 the building. 44 45 IX. REPORTS FROM STAFF. 46 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 20, 2011 Page 8 1 None. 2 3 X. OTHER BUSINESS. 4 5 None. 6 7 XI. COMMUNITY FORUM. 8 9 None. 10 11 XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 12 13 None. 14 15 XIII. ADJOURNMENT. 16 17 Motion by Commissioner Poucher, second by Commissioner Cincoski, to adjourn the meeting at 18 9:34 p.m. 19 20 Motion carried 4-0. 21 22 Respectfully submitted, 23 Barbara Hughes 24 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. STAFF REPORT To: Chair and Planning Commissioners From: Kim Moore-Sykes, Assistant City Manager Date: October 18, 2011 Subject: 2824 - 2828 Anthony Lane South; LI CUP for Mountain of Fire Miracles Ministry Requested Action: Public Hearing with the Planning Commission Date Application Received: August 17, 2011 Property Address: 2824- 2828 Anthony Lane Zoning District: Light Industrial 60-Day Expires: October 17, 2011 Waiver Letter Required: Yes Yes Date Sent: 10/5/2011 No Future Action: City Council Approval. Background. The property at 2824 and 2828 Anthony Lane South is currently zoned Light Industrial and was built in 1978 as a part of the original St. Anthony Office Park. The purpose of the Light Industrial District is to designate areas for, and regulate the development of, light industry. Areas are designated as light industrial due to the proximity of high capacity roadways or rail facilities and existing development and regulated to enhance the compatibility of light industrial uses and uses within the commercial and residential districts. Subsection 152.141 lists the permitted uses,which are light industrial in nature and Subsection 152.142 list permitted conditional uses and these are uses that are only allowed by the approval of City Council of a conditional use permit. Conditional permitted uses for Light Industrial include (G), Assembly, meeting lodge,or convention halls. Staff met with Mr.Tom Baker, KW Commercial,and the applicant in April to discuss the proposed purchase of 2824 and 2828 Anthony Lane South. Mr. Baker advised Staff that his client is the pastor of the Mountain of Fire Miracles Ministry,a Christian denomination based in Houston,TX. The Miracles Ministry group is looking at large buildings like the subject property to use as an assembly and meeting place for their members. Mr. Baker reported that this group plans to use the building mostly on Sundays and some week nights. He indicated that these times of use would not impact the surrounding properties as they are not generally open for business on Sundays or week nights. Staff has contacted the Fire Department to advise staff on any fire suppression needs for a potential occupancy of up to 200 people. This number was determined based on the information provided by Preliminary Furniture Plan and conversations with Mr. Baker. The Fire Department indicated that the building had recently been renovated and as a result, it is sprinkled in the large,open areas but may need to be alarmed in the office areas. I was advised by Mr. Baker that the Ministry would have adequate parking for their members. He estimated that they have about 170 spaces. Staff counted 70 parking spaces on the subject property from a site plan that was submitted by the applicants as part of their application submission. The City's zoning code for parking (152.178(5) (g)) in the Light Industrial District requires 1 parking space for every1,000 SF of building floor area,which is 14 spaces,clearly not adequate for the proposed use. Staff reviewed the code for parking required for similar uses,which are churches and clubs. The parking requirement for these uses is the total designated seating capacity of the structure divided by 2.5. The seating capacity as noted on the site plan is 210 and doing the computation gives the site the minimum of 84 parking spaces. Using the seating capacity,the available parking is short by 14 parking spaces. When staff used the congregation size of 170,the required parking spaces is 68 spaces. Staff was assured by Mr. Baker that they will not grow to more than the current membership. Staff has received calls from one of the tenants at 2824-2828 Anthony Lane South for status updates on the disposition of this application. The caller,who works for the University of Minnesota,has requested that Staff keep them updated on the status because if the City approves the Mountain of Fire Miracles Ministry's application and the sale goes through, they will be required by law to find another place to rent. A neighboring property owner called to say he is concerned that the proposed buyer will not have enough parking for their congregation. Attachments. • Application • Written Statement from Pastor Nnaemeka C. Uchegbu • Floor Plan • Site Plan la 3301 Silver Lake Road •St.Anthony,MN 55418 • (p)612.782.3301 • (f)612.782.3302 www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION $130 Conditional Use Permit Fee A. GENERAL DATA NAME OF APPLICANT: M.OLttr"I Q Vr— M 1015'TrZq MQ The above-named individual,firm or corporation hereby respectfully submits the following data in support of the preliminary information provided on the accompanying zoning application summary from dated for the purpose of securing a Conditional Use Permit. CONTACT PERSON: i N C 2 A N A CL A A � I Z -SCJ �9 91 Last N e; j First Daytime Phone Number PROPERTY ADDRESS: �r �lsfNa� Y L ,cJ�' ST. 0}tJT HpA'1 Y B. PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Specify the section of the ordinance which applies to this project: 2. Brief narrative description of this request and address each of the following items as they relate to your project: a.) The use is one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning district in which the property is located; b.) The City Council specify conditions that it deems necessary to make the use compatible with other uses in the area; C.) The use will not be detrimental to the health,safety,or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or to the values of property in the vicinity; d.) The use will provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare. Written justification for the request,including discussion of how any potential conflicts with existing nearby land uses will be minimized: 3. Check all additional supporting documents and data which are being submitted to help explain this project proposal: ❑ site plan ❑ engineering plans ❑ topographic map O landscaping plans ❑ detailed narrative ❑ elevations ❑ operation plans I hereby certify with my signature tha5d a p 'cation forms,plans and specifications TO ue and correct to the best of my knowledge: i � Signature of � t F:\Planning\Forms\2005 CUP Application Information.doc 08417-- 11 * 1 � �®C Print- Maps � c� � � Page 1 of 1 Bing Maps - Q ,t My Notes - i 94 �P rT K_ - •- - Y r' On the go?Use mA M9.eom to find maps. directions,businesses,anc more '' r- ' ' 6 l t r t y low http://www.bing.com/maps/print.aspx?mkt=en-us&z=18&s=h&cp=45.019230,-93.210195&pt=pb 10/6/2011 May 13, 2011 Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes Saint Anthony Village 3301 St. Anthony Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 Dear Ms. Moore-Sykes: We appreciate the City of St. Anthony reviewing the conditional use permit application for Mountain of Fire Miracles Ministry in the use of the property at 2 ,24-28 Anthony Lane. The reason for the conditional use permit is for the church to purchase and make use of a minimally leased office/industrial building in southern St. Anthony. This is in an area of industrial/office use with some other uses that have required a conditional use, such as a daycare. The property currently has two tenants and is 26% leased. The building value has dropped by 52% from the purchase in 2005. The church is negotiating final terms of a purchase agreement which is based on receiving the Conditional Use Permit from the City of St. Anthony. The church will allow the two tenants to stay in the building, at their option, but does not plan to lease any space in the building after these tenants vacate. Mountain of Fire Miracles Ministry is a Christian Church with a national headquarters in Houston. The church would have the highest use of the property when the majority of the other businesses are closed or operating minimally. The church would use the building for Sunday services with smaller groups through the week. The church has normal attendance of 150-165 at the Sunday service. The current on site parking will handle parking for 170. The removal of 13,595 square feet of vacant space will allow the vacancy factor for the city to be favorably adjusted. The weekend use will provide activity in the area when other businesses are closed. This will be an excellent use of the building in an area bordered by industrial, retail and cemetery uses. We appreciate your consideration of the application for a Conditional Use Permit and look forward to working with the city staff on this process. Sincerely, Pastor Nnaemeka C. Uchegbu . ain tehou ills 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 Office: (612) 782-3301 • Fax: (612) 782-3302 • www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us October 5, 2011 Mr. Nnaemeka C. Uchegbu,Pastor C/O Mr.Tom Baker,CCIM 3464 Washington Drive, #100 Eagan,MN 55122 RE: 2824 and 2828 Anthony Lane S. Dear Pastor Uchegbu: Minnesota State Statutes require that any land use or zoning-related application be approved or denied by the governing body within 60 days of receipt of the completed application by the political subdivision. The statute also allows for the City to extend the 60 day rule by an additional 60 days when circumstances require an extension and that extension must be conveyed to the applicant in writing. To be in compliance with this statute,the City is sending you this letter to advise you that consideration of your application will require an additional 60 days to complete. Your application was accepted by City staff on August 17, 2011,which requires the City to render a decision on your application by October 16, 2011. Your request for a Conditional Use Permit will be heard in Public Hearing on October 18, two days after the 60-day rule expires. Since the Planning Commission meets only once a month, the City is extending the 60-Day Rule so that your application will be heard at a Public Hearing before the Planning Commission on October 18,2011 and a decision can be made on your request at the City Council meeting on October 25, 2011. Your presence or that of your representative is required at both of these meetings. If you or your representative are not present at or are unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting on the above-referenced date, the Planning Commission will automatically table your request until their next meeting. If you have questions or concerns regarding this process or your application,please feel free to contact me at 612-782-3312. Sincerely, Kim Moore-Sykes Assistant City Manager Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 7:00 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as possible, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, for the following purpose: Petitioner: Mountain of Fire Miracles Ministries Subject Property: 2824&2828 Anthony Lane S Request: Conditional Use Permit for Assembly Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at said time and place. Questions regarding this matter may be referred to the Assistant City Manager at 612-782- 3312. Auxiliary hearing aids are available upon request with advanced notice. Please call the City Clerk at 612-782-3312 to make arrangements. Kim Moore-Sykes Assistant City Manager Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin October 12, 2011 160'-0" 8_0 12051 215 225 235 245 255 265 275 u- u- m (VERIFY) Lu Lu Q 5PRINKLER/ p WATER cb MAIN 00 00 i (VERIFY) VERIFY DRAIN FDLu W HVAC w 200 220 230 240 250 260 N REV DATE DE5GRIPTION 0 MFM MINNESOTA EXISTING PLAN 5/13/11 UPDATED co PASTOR NNAEMEKA UGHEOE3U 2 w 651-274—G224 2828 ANTHONY LANE SOUTH 3 a DRAFT N6 61448 GREEK RI06E LANE ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 55418 AND5AVACE, MN. 55315 GHEGKED BY DRAWN BY DATE SCALE SHEET NO. Q ESTIMATING (612) ci65-3ci61G RPG 5 Ilb'-0" F205 215 225 12351 2451 2551 12651 275 m u n u u u u II II II II p II u u n u u II II II II II I I II III II I II I II �-iur� -----�---=ipj F-�._--- ----=�9 SPRINKLER/ Li 11 �J I� L� I L� II II ii �J WATER MAIN 00 00 II 11 III \ I 1IF 11 II E�=� jlY, N VERIFY�j J -,�I ILS II JJ' DRAIN- I, II F--=--� IIL� �- �___ F�II II II Lu p 11 I I HV G w ii II 200 12201 230 12401 12501 F2670 N REV DATE DESCRIPTION MFM MINNESOTACD DEMOLITION PLAN 1 4/8/11 CLIENT REVIEW N PASTOR NNAEMEKA UGHEOBU 2 5/13/11 UPDATES > 651-2-74-1224 2828 ANTHONY LANE SOUTH OX R 6 0 a DRAFTING x448 GREEK RIDGE LANE ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 55418 4 AND SAVAGE, MN 55318 GHEGKED BY DRAWN BY DATE SCALE SHEETjN0. (612) 165-3111 RPG 3/q/I I 1"=20'-0" D 0 ESTIMATING Ilb'-O" 160'-0" bi-o 205 215 225 275 BOOK LIBRARY > > > > STORE O O O O GOAT T' �r ROOM e cn wlrivow OFFICE OFFICE STORAGE NEN , ENTRANGE ssa�rro ROOM a LOBBY s 42• SANGTUARY 42' 0 O u l l worms1 SPRINKLER/ II I rCONGREGATION SIZE Il0 T MAIN R I � oo ADMINISTRATIVE ID OFFIGES I II uTv �I r� MEETING i T U HALL �.� iNEw NEw 5E$ 11NI -7!� FP ° W ALTER HVAC w o) 200 230 260 N REV DATE DESCRIPTION MFM MINNESOTA pREL I M I NARY PLAN 1 4/8/11 CLIENT REVIEH N PASTOR NNAEMEKA UGHEOBU MFM MINNESOTA 2 5/13/11 UPDATES > 651-214-8224 2828 ANTHONY LANE SOUTH 3a DRAFT NC g448 GREEK RIDGE LANE ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 55418 4 AND SAVAGE, MN. 55318 GHEGKED BY DRAWN BY DATE SCALE SHEET NO. (612) q65-3ggq RPG 5/q/11 I"=20'-O" 5 ESTIMATING pm- Il6'-0" 205 215 225 275 BOOK LIBRARY 0 O O O STORE 16' " �- GOAT � ' ROOM m wl►roow OFFICE OFFICE STORAGE N W EN NGE S5OLM rioom < LOBBY 0000❑o 0000000 00000 s 000000 0000000 0000a 0 42' SANGTUARY 42' a SPRINKLER/ o4QJ� II I I wOMENS e� � WATER II I ri "�O MAIN 91 � oo ADMINISTRATIVE Quuuu 00000000 111QI a OFFIGE5 IL�II ~ I� j Y F1ErLi c0 i�T Li gg_g�g SEATING FOR 210 000 000 0 uaaasss FO J ALIMa 000000000uuu N HVAC w 200 230 260 N REV DATE DESCRIPTIONcn MFM MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAN — FURNITURE 1 4/8/11 CLIENT REVIEW co PASTOR NNAEMEKA UGHEOBU MFM MINNESOTA 2 5/13/11 UPDATES > 651-274-8224 2828 ANTHONY LANE SOUTH R 6 3 a DRAFTING g448 GREEK RI06E LANE ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 5540 4 AND SAVAGE, MN. 55318 GHEGKED BY DRAWN BY DATE SGALE SHEET NO. (612) q65-3ggq RPG 5/13/11 1"=201-o', A 3 1 5 ESTIMATING ANTHONY LANE S O U T H 1 NEW —j z z ENTRY zz EX15TINO N Y N BUILDING X Q wD- wQ u i EXISTING PARK I NO N REV DATE DE5GRIPTION 0 MFM MINNESOTA SITE PLAN 1 5/13/11 UPDATES co PASTOR NNAEMEKA UGHEOBU 2 T 651-274-8224 2828 ANTHONY LANE SOUTH 3 D AFT N6 g448 GREEK RIDGE8 LANE ST. ANTHONY, MINNESOTA 5541 4 AND 5AVA&E, MN. 55318 GHEGKED BY DRAWN BY DATE SGALE SHEET NO. Q (612) %5-3ggq RPG 448/11 I"=40'—O" 5 E5TIMATIN6 1 STAFF REPORT To: Chair and Planning Commissioners From: Kim Moore-Sykes, Assistant City Manager Date: October 18,2011 Subject: 3701 Chandler Drive —Variance to Front Yard Setback Requested Action: Public Hearing with the Planning Commission Date Application Received: September 27, 2011 Property Address: 3701 Chandler Drive Zoning District: R-4 60-Day Expires: November 25, 2011 Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent: No X Future Action: City Council Approval Background. Staff met with Mr. Alan Plutowski,Trossen Wright Plutowski Architects,PA, to discuss a renovation project at Chandler Place. The property owners are proposing to construct a porte cochere to provide a canopy over the drop-off area at the main entrance to the facility for the safety and convenience of the residents and visitors. Because the building is built up to the property line, the property owners are seeking a variance in order to move forward with this proposal. The City Code states that the front yard setback for an R-4 principal structure is 30'from the property line. Staff reviewed the property file and found that Chandler Place was built in 1966,ten years before the City codified its Zoning Ordinance. Since there were no regulations in place to prevent the owners at the time from building at the property line, the current owners have a practical difficulty if they want to build a porte cochere and are required to seek a variance for their project. Analysis: The property owners are responsible for demonstrating why the strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for them by preventing the subject property to be used in a reasonable manner; that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner; that the variance if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties (City Code §152.245(C)). In the written statement from the applicant, Mr. Dan Cayemburg,the project manager for Chandler Place, stated that strict enforcement of the front yard setback would allow an issue of safety to continue to exist F:\ lanning\Staff Reports\201 1\101 82011 3701 Chandler Dr front yard setback variance c stf rpt.dotm10182011 3701 Chandler Dr front yard setback variance c stf rpt.dotm for the residents and visitor of Chandler Place during inclement weather. Mr. Cayemberg further states that the granting of the variance to allow the porte-cochere will give protected ingress and egress to the facility. Since this is a public facility,it is reasonable for residents and visitors alike to expect safe access to the building. The situation of the structure being built up to the property line and in the front yard setback was not caused by the current owner. According to information in the property file,Chandler Place was built prior to the City of St. Anthony Village adopting its zoning code and therefore circumstances exist that are unique to the property. Mr. Cayemberg continues to say that if granted, the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Chandler Place is in the R-4 zoning district,where neighboring properties are of the same character and nature. The purpose of the R-4 zoning district is to provide areas for housing other than l- and 2-family dwellings and townhomes. He also states that economic considerations alone are the basis of the variance request. Mr. Cayemberg further explains that the owner is willing to spend the money to improve the safety of the facility by insuring that main public entrances are safe and secure while at the same time,enhancing the appearance of the facility. Staff has checked with the Fire Department for their comments. They indicated that the height of the porte- cochere would not cause them an issue. They would like a "no parking fire lane" designation on Chandler Drive,adjacent to the entrance of the proposed porte-cochere. Attachments. • Email from Mr. Plutowski • Existing and Proposed Site Plan • Rendering of the Main Entrance • Photos of the Current Main Entrance F:\Planning\Staff Reports\2011\10182011 3701 Chandler Dr front yard setback variance c stf rpt.dotm10182011 3701 Chandler Dr front yard setback variance c stf rpt.dotm 6illa h0n 3301 Silver Lake Road •St.Anthony,MN 55418 • (p)612.782.3301 • (f)612.782.3302 www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us VARIANCE APPLICATION FEE: $60 Residential $100 Other Zoning Districts A.GENERAL DATA APPLICANT'S NAME: AJ A IJ �i,y-T n The above-named individual,firm,or corporation hereby respectfully submits the following information for the purpose of securing a variance from existing land use zoning controls as found in the City of St. Anthony's Zoning Code. Pl.v-f0ws4LI ALAN 7G-5,533 ' 11 '11 X15 Contact Person Last Name First Day Phone B. PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Subject Property Address: �7a t Ci c �P.✓' Av`e 2. Specify the nature of the project for r which a variance is sought: o tiv s ty�_ f Q Rw' re c eve � P.w ��2 WMI i t+ �t� � lig T�`c,� -{'�.€. V`G►r�ck� auk l'f.-c � v fs f err r 3. Explain how ourrwish to vary from the applicable provisions of the Ordinance: Cdc".? L A4(f�J X,1Aa 4. Explain in a written statement why the strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for the applicant,preventing the subject property to be used in a reasonable manner;that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner;that the variance if granted,will not alter the essential the character of the locality;and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. Please address each of these items in your written statement. (City Code§152.245(C)) 5. Check all additional supporting documents which are being submitted to help explain this project proposal: 1� Site Plan* El Topographic Map "Other(specify) I n�G•�'a� �1C v�Tlo.� *Required Can attach additional pages to fidly explain proposal and need for variance. I HEREBY CERTIFY TH MY SIGNATUR HAT ALL DATA ON MY APPLICATION FORMS,PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT T E BE OF MY KNOWLED E. Signature o Applicant Date EXPIRATION Within one(1)year after the approval of a variance or appeal if the property owner or applicant has not substantially started the construction of any building,structure,addition or alteration requested as part of the approval,said variance shall become null and void unless an application for extension of the approval has been submitted. A letter to extend the approval of a variance shall be submitted to the Assistant City Manager not les than thirty(30)days before the 'expiration of said approval. Such letter shall state the fact for the request,showing a good faith attempt to utilize the variance,and it shall state the additional time being requested to begin the proposed construction. The City Council may grant extensions not to exceed one(1)year. (Rev.July 2011) F:\Planning\Forms\Variance Amendment Application July 2011.doc 09-27# 1 1 �O �fCl Trossen Wright Plutowski Architects, P.A. 4125 Lakeland Ave N- Suite 200 Minneapolis,MN 55422 Phone 763-533-7171 Fax 763-533-7979 Email dcayemberg_a,twparchitects.com Transmittal #S3311-T002 Date: September 23, 2011 To: Saint Anthony Village Via Hand Delivery Attn: Kim Moore- Sykes, Assistant City Manager Phone: 612-782-3312 3301 Silver Lake Road Fax: 612-782-3302 Saint Anthony,MN 55418-1699 From: Dan Cayemberg,Project Manager Subject: Variance Statement Project: Porte Cochere Addition Chandler Place Senior Housing 3701 Chandler Place St. Anthony, MN 55421 This statement is in response to the questions required in applying for and granting a variance. Strict enforcement of the zoning code on this property will maintain an issue of safe access to the facility in inclement weather. Granting of the variance will allow construction of the drive through porte-cochere at the entry to this facility to allow safe,protected ingress and egress to this facility and to vehicles bringing people to and from the facility. The construction of the proposed porte-cochere is a permanent structure built of steel standing seam metal roofing & stucco columns attached to one side of the existing building. It is a completely reasonable feature for such a facility and it is not permitted by the zoning code due to the front yard setback requirements on this site. The construction of the proposed porte-cochere is necessary to provide safe, protected ingress and egress for residents and visitors. The setbacks are unique to the property and are not created by the property owner and the current 30' setback was not a requirement when the building was originally designed and constructed. The existing pedestrian canopy extends into this setback area and is intended to be removed with this addition. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. It will improve the character of the area by enhancing the appearance of the facility. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. The owner is willing to spend this money to improve safe ingress and egress and enhance the appearance of the facility. Due to the layout of the building and site,this is the only way to achieve this in an effective efficient manner to the main entry of the facility. Chandler Place Variance Statement Page 2 of 2 The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the city's comprehensive land use plan. The land use plan for this site is and will remain multiple-unit residential. The porte-cochere will enhance the ability of the facility to continue the current use as multi-unit senior housing. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code. In that the intent of the code is to"protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the city and its people through the establishment of minimum regulations governing land development and use", the granting of this variance will allow the construction of the proposed porte-cochere which will aid in providing safe ingress and egress for building residents and visitors and will also enhance the appearance of the facility, thereby improving the general welfare of the city. Thank You. END OF VARIANCE STATEMENT 'i EXHIBIT A Legal Description The real property located in Ramsey County,Minnesota, and legally described as: I All of Lot 11, Block 11, Mounds View Acres Second Addition, except the North 74.00 feet of the East 30 feet thereof;Lot 12, Block 11,Mounds View Acres Second Addition; all of Lot 13,Block 11,Mounds View Acres Second Addition,except the East 30.00 feet thereof. Together with the benefits contained in the Declaration of Easements and Real Covenants dated December 18, 1985, filed of record February 7, 1986, as Document No. 795498, as amended by First Amendment to i Declaration of Easements and Real Covenants dated May 13,1996, filed May 22,1996, as Document No. 1121355. i i ' Ramsey County, Minnesota Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 380734 ! f �I r Mt_ I A l q fir,. :ya � t t iwl 1 VV 1 +�t •L"r_. ,:.01 Ni��5 Oil 101 4 12 r N � � w.l � u 30,-0, SETBACK i R 11'-0 -0' is • -r-- 5.401 — i i 30' R i CRANDLER PLACE SENIOR HOUSNG 0 5 15 30 60 NORTH EXISTING SITE PLAN TROSSEN VMGH3' PLLTrCWM AR ?A SETBACK i i 18'� 24' 24' 4' 21'-6 R i i 3m' R i CHANDLER PIACE SENIOR HOUSING 0 5 15 30 60 NORTH PROPOSED SITE PLAN TROBSEN WRIGHT FLUME ARCHPA - - - r -1 4 ........................ 4 I V CHANDLER PLACE SENIOR HOUSING 01 2 4 a 16 PROPOSED BITE PLAN - OPTION 'B' TROSSEN WRIGHT O UI'� � P'`,' ain thon ills e 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 Office: (612) 782-3301 • Fax: (612) 782-3302 • www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us October 5, 2011 Mr. Alan Plutowski Trossen Wright Plutowski Architects,PA 4125 Lakeland Avenue N,Suite 200 Minneapolis,MN 55422 Dear Mr. Plutowski: Your request for a 30 foot variance to the front yard setback, written statement, and fess were received on September 27, 2011 and will be presented to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 7:05 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. Minnesota State Statutes require that any land use or zoning applications, such as yours,be approved or denied by the City Council within 60 days of receipt of a completed application. According the 60-Day Rule, the City has 60 calendar days to take action on your request. The 60 days for your request expire on November 25, 2011. The City's process for considering your variance request includes a public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for October 18, 2011. The Planning Commission recommendations will then be presented to the City Council at their meeting scheduled for October 25, 2011 at 7:00pm. While the City Council is expected to make a decision on your application at the above-mentioned meeting, Minnesota Statute does allow the City to request in writing, an additional 60 days should it become apparent that the original 60 days are not sufficient to process your application. Nothing is anticipated at this time that would cause a delay,but again, you will be notified in writing if additional time to issue a final decision on your request is needed by the City. Your presence or that of a representative is required at both meetings. If you or a representative is not present at the Planning Commission meeting on the above - referenced Planning Commission meeting date, the Planning Commission may Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure. table the request until the applicant or the applicant's representative is able to attend. If you have any additional questions about this information, please feel free to call me at 612-782-3312 or email me at kim.moore-sykes®ci.saint-anthony.mn.us. Sincerely, 4Yr�- )krou- Kim Moore Assistant City Manager r STAFF REPORT To: Chair and Planning Commissioners From: Kim Moore-Sykes, Assistant City Manager Date: October 18,2011 Subject: Garage Setback Permit Request-3205-36th Avenue NE Requested Action: Public Hearing with Planning Commission Date Application Received: September 23, 2011 Property Address: 3205-36`h Avenue NE Zoning District: R-1 60-Day Expires: November 21, 2011 Waiver Letter Required: N/A Date Sent: No Future Action: City Council Approval Background. Mr. Donald Pavelka,owner of 3205 -36th Avenue NE, attended a concept review to discuss their plans to build a 6' addition to an existing attached single car garage on their property. The current garage is located 9' from the side property line and if allowed to build the 6' addition,the addition will be 2 feet into the side yard setback. The owners are requesting a Garage Setback Permit to build the addition, giving them a double car garage. The City's zoning code requires that anyone wanting to build a garage in the rear yard setback and/or side yard setback of their property have to apply for a Garage Setback Permit and have it approved by the City Council(152.176 (F)). The property owners are responsible for demonstrating why the strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for them by preventing the subject property to be used in a reasonable manner; that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; that the variance if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties (City Code §152.245(C)). They have stated in their written statement that the existing attached garage is a single car garage. They can only have one car in the garage at a time and since they own two cars,they would like be able to put both cars in the garage year round. In Minnesota, it is reasonable to have a double car garage and it would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood as most, if not all houses have double car garages. This home was constructed in 1958,a time when single car garages were prevalent and one car was all most could afford. This was not a situation that the Pavelkas created and economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. F:\Planning\Staff Reports\2011\10182011 3205 36th garage permitstf rpt.doc10182011 3205 36th garage permitstf rpt.doc The addition of 6' to the existing garage adds 144 SF of impervious surface. Without the addition,lot coverage is at 12%;with the addition,lot coverage is 18%,well within the 35% lot coverage maximum for an interior residential lot. The addition also increases the size of the existing garage to 528 SF, the maximum size allowed in the rear yard setback and the side yard setback. Attachments. • Property Owner's Application • Site Plan • Property Owner's Written Statement • Elevations FAPIanning\Staff Reports\2011\10182011 3205 36th garage permitstf rpt.doc10182011 3205 36th garage permitstf rpt.doc 1 n,- HE !e-H _ 3301 Silver Lake Road •St. Anthony, MN 55418 • (p)612.782.3301 • (f)612.782.3302 www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us VARIANCE APPLICATION FEE: $60 Residential $100 Other Zoning Districts A.GENERAL DATA 1 APPLICANT'S NAME: ' o a c lC _ 1 OL V C L G� The above-named individual,firm,or corporation hereby respectfully submits the following information for the purpose of securing a variance from existing land use zoning controls as found in fthe City lof St. Anthony's Zoning Code. PGL1�e �C�� M rJc� 4�� C�p1-)-) 7 9 67W S__ Contact Person Last Name First Day Phone B. PROJECT INFORMATION o��J ts 1nn � N1. Subject Property Address: `� 2. Specify the natu e of�qroject for which a variance is sought: h - -CL110kA S - 4:o ma k� S - rk ,2 O,,O I e 3. Explain how you wish to vary from thea licable provisions of the Ordinance: � �,��� o.,,- ✓ e e r+v j _1l r }� i n 1 ru)�-e c:k a- tp� S Re 2 4- 1I 4. Explain in a written statement why the strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for the applicant,preventing the subject property to be used in a reasonable manner; that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; that the variance if granted,will not alter the essential the character of the locality;and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. Please address each of these items in your written statement. (City Code§152.245(C)) 5. Check all additional supporting documents which are being submitted to help explain this project proposal: 1�Site Plan* ❑ Topographic Map ❑ Other(specify) Required Can attach additional pages to fidly explain proposal and need for vanance. I HEREBY CERTIFY WITH MY IGNATURE THAT ALL DA N MY APPLICATION FORMS,PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF KNOWLEDGE. Sign lure of A licant Date EXPIRATION Within one(1)year after the approval of a variance or appeal if the property owner or applicant has not substantially started the construction of any building,structure,addition or alteration requested as part of the approval,said variance shall become null and void unless an application for extension of the approval has been submitted. A letter to extend the approval of a variance shall be submitted to the Assistant City Manager not les than thirty(30)days before the expiration of said approval. Such letter shall state the fact for the request,showing a good faith attempt to utilize the variance,and it shall state the additional time being requested to begin the proposed construction. The City Council may grant extensions not to exceed one(1)year. (Rev.July 2011) F:\Planning\Forms\Variance Amendment Application July 2011.doc VARIANCE APPLICATION Question #4 We are applying for a variance of the Ordinance for the purpose of making a single car garage into a double garage. Expanding the current garage by 6 feet allows for a standard 16 foot double garage door and adequate access on each side for getting into and out of vehicles. There are two cars used by the residents and this would enable both cars to be parked indoors year round. The addition is planned to stay true with the current character of the house and neighborhood. A Moot gable will be used on this side of the home for water drainage to comply with the 30" from property line Ordinance. No changes in size will be made to the current(double wide) driveway. The purposed six foot addition would be within the 35% lot coverage maximum. 32 90, 1' ti 3D, ,9 L •__ r$- i �, C � Ili t x I 1 Is Iii lei o ENaT�$ IRON I° _ =3p'. SGAL I her�t�y caxti�'y that phi$ suroey waa :"prepared by me: or uder :aupervi�3on axil that ``I: em `a duly .Reg istere8 Lancs S� iweyox under ..a3�e .a,aa►e` of the :5: at 0, of °Minneso a:; Date P. /L !��9,4'Z Re: .No s A r : f � 1 a d i;7'G R s� I r J I � ............................. JUT . ain thou ilia e 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 Office: (612) 782-3301 • Fax: (612) 782-3302 • www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us October 5, 2011 Donald and Kimberlee Pavelka 3205-36thAvenue NE St. Anthony,MN 55418 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Pavelka: Your request for a Garage Setback Permit, written statement, and fess were received on September 27, 2011 and will be presented to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 7:05 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. Minnesota State Statutes require that any land use or zoning applications, such as yours, be approved or denied by the City Council within 60 days of receipt of a completed application. According the 60-Day Rule, the City has 60 calendar days to take action on your request. The 60 days for your request expire on November 25, 2011. The City's process for considering your variance request includes a public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for October 18, 2011. The Planning Commission recommendations will then be presented to the City Council at their meeting scheduled for October 25, 2011 at 7:00pm. While the City Council is expected to make a decision on your application at the above-mentioned meeting, Minnesota Statute does allow the City to request in writing, an additional 60 days should it become apparent that the original 60 days are not sufficient to process your application. Nothing is anticipated at this time that would cause a delay, but again, you will be notified in writing if additional time to issue a final decision on your request is needed by the City. Your presence or that of a representative is required at both meetings. If you or a representative is not present at the Planning Commission meeting on the above - referenced Planning Commission meeting date, the Planning Commission may table the request until the applicant or the applicant's representative is able to attend. Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure. STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission From: Kim Moore-Sykes OV) Date: October 18,2011 Subject: Garage Setback Permit and Variance Request for Garage Size 3219 Stinson Boulevard NE Requested Action: Public Hearing with the Planning Commission Date Application Received: September 30,2011 Property Address: 3219 Stinson Boulevard NE Zoning District: R-1 60-Day Expires: November 28, 2011 Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent:_ No X Future Action: City Council Approval Background. Ms. Rachel Sanzone,property owner of 3219 Stinson Boulevard,is requesting a Garage Setback Permit and a 308 SF variance to rebuild her garage that was severely damaged in a summer storm. She had originally requested a building permit but when Staff was reviewing Ms. Sanzone's building permit application,they discovered that the former owner had built a 396 SF "garage addition' to an existing garage in 2003. The current property owner,Rachel Sanzone,who purchased the property two years ago,was called and advised that she could not rebuild the size of garage that she previously had,that it had been built illegally. She responded that she used the garage and expected to be able to replace it; that she had called her insurance company about the storm damage and had contractors ready to start rebuilding. Analysis. Ms. Sanzone is insistent that she be able to rebuild her garage to the size that she had when she bought the property. She stated she was not aware at the time of purchase that the garage was illegally built and maintains that the garage was the reason that she bought the property. She is a potter and the large garage offered her a place to do her craft as well as park her car. Ms. Sanzone's lot is 50' x 163' or 8,150SF; is an interior lot;is non-conforming due to its width and total area; and has a maximum of 40% lot coverage. Ms. Sanzone reported that all of the temporary storage sheds have been removed from the lot;they were not there when she purchased the property. If that is the case, her lot coverage,including the over-sized garage,is at 38%. The property owners are responsible for demonstrating why the strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for them by preventing the subject property to be used in a reasonable manner; F:\Planning\Staff Reports\2011\10182011 3219 Stinson Blvd garage permit stf rpt.doc10182011 3219 Stinson Blvd garage permit stf rpt.doc that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; that the variance if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. (City Code §152.245(C)) 1. The request is not within the scope of Subsection 152.176 (F), Garage Setback Permit. The Code allows for a 528 SF garage to be in the side yard setback and/or the rear yard setback. Ms. Sanzone also needs a 308 SF variance to the Garage Setback Permit in order to build the size of garage that was originally there. 2. Strict enforcement would cause no practical difficulties because: a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a manner that is not otherwise permitted by the zoning code. If she wants to build a garage in the setback„the Ordinance requires it to be at maximum,528SF. She is also allowed to build a garage up to 1,000 SF as long as it is out of the rear yard and side yard setbacks. b. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner. While the construction of two garages was not done by the current owner, the previous owner was aware that the garage situation that he was creating was illegal. The City also did not amend the ordinance in any way that created this situation.The City Attorney confirmed that this situation with the garages is not a non-conforming situation,therefore does not meet the test of having circumstances unique to the property. C. The variance,if granted will alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The property owner has demonstrated that the siting of the proposed rebuilt garage will be in essentially the same location as the current structure. Nevertheless,building a garage that is proposed to be 836 SF in the setbacks does alter the essential character of the residential neighborhood. d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. 3. The variance, if granted, would not be consistent with the with the City's comprehensive land use plan. While the City does recognize that attached and detached garages are appropriate uses in the residential zoning districts, it has set limitation to size in order to keep and maintain the residential nature of an R-1 zoning designation. 4. The granting of the variance is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code. Attachments. • Site Plan from 2003 • 2011 Building Permit Application F:\Planning\StaffReports\2011\10182011 3219 Stinson Blvd garage permit stf rpt.doc10182011 3219 Stinson Blvd garage permit stf rpt.doc • IV miur adrQ SA d,, RP-�m-J 3301 Silver Lake Road 'St. Anthony,MN 55418 • (p)612.782.3301 • (f)612.782.3302 www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us VARIANCE APPLICATION FEE: $60 Residential $100 Other Zoning Districts A.GENERAL DATA APPLICANT'S NAME:` L\ The above-named individual,firm,or corporation hereby respectfully submits the following information for the purpose of securing a variance from existing land use zoning controls as found in the City of St. Anthony's Zoning Code. Contact Person Last Name First Day Phone B. PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Subject Property Address: Pjvd St AmSom,/q 499419 2. Specif the natuie of the project for which a variance is sought: dMild 00 U KJExplain how you wish o vary from thep licable rovisi of the Ordinance,; Q` r 4. Explain in a written statement why the strict enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties for e applicant,preventing the subject property to be used in a reasonable manner;that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner;that the variance if granted,will not alter the essential the character of the locality;and that economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. Please address each of these items in your written statement. (City Code§152.245(C)) 5. Check all additional supporting documents which are being submitted to help explain this project proposal: ❑ Site Plan* ❑ Topographic Map ❑ Other(specify) *Required Can attach additional pages to fidly explain proposal and need for variance. I HEREBY CERTIFY WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT ALL DATA ON MY APPLICATION FORMS,PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Signature of Applicant Date EXPIRATION Within one(1)year after the approval of a variance or appeal if the property owner or applicant has not substantially started the construction of any building,structure,addition or alteration requested as part of the approval,said variance shall become null and void unless an application for extension of the approval has been submitted. A letter to extend the approval of a variance shall be submitted to the Assistant City Manager not les than thirty(30)days before the expiration of said approval. Such letter shall state the fact for the request,showing a good faith attempt to utilize the variance,and it shall state the additional time being requested to begin the proposed construction. The City Council may grant extensions not to exceed one(1)year. (Rev.July 2011) F:\Planning\Forms\Variance Amendment Applicatimy 1. oc Written Statement September 30`h 2011 Saint Anthony Village RE: Variance Permit Location: 3219 Stinson Blvd I am asking that a variance be granted to allow me to rebuild my garage as it was before it collapsed as a result of my neighbor's tree falling on it. Because of this act of God which was beyond my control, I am being penalized. This has been a long and drugged out process that has not only caused me to not be able to use my garage, but it has and will continue to cause me a lot of unnecessary stress in my life. I am asking to put my garage and property back to what it was, prior to the storm and nothing more. I do not believe this garage caused any issues or complaints before and will not alter or change the character of the locality or affect any neighbors. If granted I would be able to have my garage back in time for winter I would like to get this issue resolved so I can move on with my life, and be able to use my garage in the same manner as I was able to before the storm hit. Respectfully, Name: RachelSanzone Date: / - 2 4 — / Print - Maps Page 1 of 1 ung Maps My Notes fft FREE!Use Bing 411 to find movies, 1;"sem ,^,t:• _s businesses &more: 909-BINE-411 �`� 27 P -low i Ah i _f t .•a 11 4� _ -_ i 27 4 71 ti 4 ; �i arr � • i• , n.�r• Y}" 5. 1.T n: TM binlL(q IbL,& Bird's eye view maps can't be printed, so another map view has been substituted. http://www.bing.com/maps/print.aspx?mkt=en-us&z=19.176583 3187483 95&s=b&cp=45.... 9/15/2011 4 Feet April 18, 2003 4 Feet N Free Te por To St. Anthony �} ami 81 � S oT ge Building Permit Department Judy LL 8'x 1 X $' i 32SI ' Creig A Schmidt ��. Castle Inspection Service ----22 Feet --� — Office 8-9 am 652-731-7881 -- - ,�T Schedule Inspection 651-636-5555 �Si ��,�:•�.tx,,�4<yMM,:�"y,h�ns±,,'1:a,;�2,;, ..M1M1<pp,'''yy�����vt� <'r LJ From Property Owner LL /�� ,(1fi,-�y � ;' �q�.`ri` E Bob Koivula co W -ir:c:'r�i�fy1,'Y� �/,,y'''"'<�y-Aj'..��� yt S� ` 1y 3219 Stinson Blvd LL a'. fir.. ,..„� St. Anthony, Mn 55418 Dear Creig and Judy, p`4.s k" x J>jy MY ,G_4i( .ie" f �y�c�'&-;54��,�:'•ai'_;1 Here is the Lot Layout for pour- ing the concrete floor. Existing Lot Length 163 Gara a Lot Width g 4 Total 81 �_L ,� N CO LL •` -0 N Roof Height = 12 feet N "1 u_ Allowable Hardcover 3264 sf (To top of roof peak.) N Existing Hardcover 0 Square Feet {{ House 1051 Garage 480 Driveway 1128 20 Feet —� New Hardcover i' Garage Addition 396 Shed 32 Play Arbor 128 Total Hardcovpr32 ai sf 26 Feet I For the record, nothing final has been built on the 4 Feet property, thou it looks like it has. k What has been tacked together E F49cks � are the 3 outside walls, and the 3 s f,� center wall, and a roof rafter idea. This was done to help Existing House PLAN the structure. Existing This was done to get the "feel”of � � Driveway (Counted big overhanging eves the property and best building.I am putting more slope on the a as part of hardcover) roof, for more interest to building. 1120 N 3 t Height = 18 Feet I Square fi I Detail of the roof rafters to follow, f! (to top of roof peak.) 36 Ft. after pouring concrete, if OK with Feet you. , Main 26x36 936 Front Porch 16x9 54 Everything can be taken down, Front Step 5x5 25 while concrete is poured, Back Step 4x9 36 if necessary. I%7`,�1 �t THANK YOU 1 ------ Bob Koivula I 12 ft. Front Porch 16x9=54 sf 9 Ft _i 952-471-9821 Lot Step Length 5x5=25 163 Feet 16 Feet 26 Feet Robel-1 K-,,) A'a 619-781 -",881 St'Anthorjy, UN Lot Width 50 Feet — . ain teonh illa 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 Office: (612) 782-3301 • Fax: (612) 782-3302 • www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us October 5, 2011 Ms. Rachel Sanzone 3219 Stinson Boulevard St. Anthony,MN 55418 Dear Ms. Sanzone: Your request for a Garage Setback Permit and 308 SF variance to the garage size limitation of 528 SF for garages located in the setbacks of the property, written statement, and fess were received on September 30,2011 and will be presented to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 7:05 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. Minnesota State Statutes require that any land use or zoning applications, such as yours, be approved or denied by the City Council within 60 days of receipt of a completed application. According the 60-Day Rule, the City has 60 calendar days to take action on your request. The 60 days for your request expire on November 29, 2011. The City's process for considering your Garage Setback Permit and Variance request includes a public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for October 18, 2011. The Planning Commission recommendations will then be presented to the City Council at their meeting scheduled for October 25, 2011 at 7:00pm. While the City Council is expected to make a decision on your application at the above-mentioned meetings, Minnesota Statute does allow the City to request in writing, an additional 60 days should it become apparent that the original 60 days are not sufficient to process your application. Nothing is anticipated at this time that would cause a delay,but again, you will be notified in writing if additional time to issue a final decision on your request is needed by the City. Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure. Your presence or that of a representative is required at both meetings. If you or a representative is not present at the Planning Commission meeting on the above - referenced Planning Commission meeting date, the Planning Commission may table the request until the applicant or the applicant's representative is able to attend. If you have any additional questions about this information, please feel free to call me at 612-782-3312 or email me at kim.moore-sykes®ci.saint-anthony.mn.us. Sincerely, Kim Moore-Sykes Assistant City Manager STAFF REPORT To: Chair and Planning Commissioners From: Kim Moore-Sykes, Assistant City Manager Date: October 18, 2011 Subject: Comprehensive Sign Plan Review —St. Anthony Shopping Center Requested Action: Planning Commission Recommendation Date Application Received: September 9, 2011 Property Address: St. Anthony Shopping Center, 2900 Pentagon Drive Zoning District: C 60-Day Expires: November 7, 2011 Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent: No Future Action: City Council Approval Background. Greg Kozulla of Kozulla&Associates,is an architect working with the owners of the St. Anthony Shopping Center to update and renovate the look of the Center. He presented information to the Planning Commission at a public hearing at the September 20th Planning Commission and at the City Council meeting on September 27th on the visual rejuvenation planned for the Shopping Center and a proposed sign plan update. Mr. Kozulla showed color renderings of what the Shopping Center might look like,including reinstallation of existing tenant signage. The St. Anthony Village Shopping Center received approval by the City Council in 1989,with an update to allowable colors presented and approved in 2003. Construction on the Shopping Center began in the late 1950's according to property file records and which continued into the early 1960's. The City Council at their September 27th meeting voted unanimously to table action on Resolution 11-058, Approving the Proposed Comprehensive Sign Plan Update for the St. Anthony Shopping Center. Mr. Kozulla is before the Planning Commission with a request to review the proposed update to the information on the technical aspects of the Shopping Center's current comprehensive sign plan and to recommend approval to the City Council. The owners are planning to renovate the facade of the stores in the Center and will give the individual tenants the opportunity to install new signs, but as stated in the 2011 Comprehensive Sign Plan,the owners will not require the current tenants to install new signs. The tenants will be given the option of re-installing their old signs,which will be grandfathered in until such time as they are replaced with new signs. Given this shopping center has two entrances /exits,Mr. Kozulla is also requesting the owner have the option in the future to provide a monument sign at the Kenzie Terrace entrance. This monument sign would be the second such sign for the Center as there is currently a pylon sign located along the County Road 88 site entrance. The current project does not include removal of the FAPlanning\Staff Reports\201 1\10182011 Sign Plan st anthony shopping centerl stf rpt.doc10182011 Sign Plan st anthony shopping centerl stf rpt.doc i + existing pylon sign nor does it include any new monument signs. Mr. Kozulla is asking that an additional monument sign at the Kenzie Terrace entrance be allowed in the future should this second sign be desired. An attached spreadsheet shows the proposed changes; the comprehensive sign plan that was adopted in 1989; and the current City Ordinance requirements for signs in the Commercial District. Mr. Kozulla addressed other issues in his letter to the City dated September 8,2011 as the result of questions asked of him by the Planning Commissioners during the concept review of the planned renovation for the Shopping Center. He received many questions regarding the parking lot for the Shopping Center because of the Center's plan to do a mill and overlay. As he stated in his letter, the Shopping Center has 86,564 gross square feet of floor area. The City Code requires that a commercial property installing a parking lot today have one (1) parking space per 300 SF of gross floor area,measuring 9' by 19'. The mill and overlay that is part of the planned renovation of the Shopping Center is nothing more than maintenance of an existing parking lot,which has existed at the current site and mostly unchanged since construction was completed in the 1960's. As such,the parking lot for the Shopping Center is considered grandfathered in and is not required to conform to the City's Zoning Ordinance on Commercial Parking, which was passed in 1976. The Center has approximately 294 parking spaces. Mr. Kozulla states,however, due to the existing landscaped islands, the size of the spaces vary from 8.5' to 10' wide and 18' long. He reports that the Center does use most of their spaces and also provides overflow parking for the Market Place Center, the retail area to the northwest of the St. Anthony Shopping Center. Attachments. • Comprehensive Sign Plan for St. Anthony Shopping Center (Including graphics and square footage tabulations. • Comparative Spreadsheet Highlighting Proposed Changes to Sign Plan • Letter regarding Facade and Site Improvements Project • Rendering of Proposed Renovations with Signs • §155.26 Shopping Centers and the Like;Plan Required • Original Comprehensive Sign Plan,1989 F:\Planning\Staff Reports\2011\10182011 Sign Plan st anthony shopping centerl stf rpt.doc10182011 Sign Plan st anthony shopping centerl stf rpt.doc Comprehensive Sign Plan Area Calculation St.Anthony Shopping Center St.Anthony,MN 10/13/11 West Building Unit A B C D E F G H I J K L(1) M(1) Wall Length ft 41.75 17.75 52.00 21.33 33.17 41.00 73.50 23.50 53.58 22.58 30.90 82.30 75.10 Wall Height h 17.33 16.17 21.00 16.17 19.67 24.00 19.67 16.00 20.00 16.00 13.50 13.50 15.00 Wall Square Footage sf 723.69 286.96 1092.00 344.90 652.29 98400 658.84 376.00 1071.67 361.33 417.15 1111.05 1126.50- 15%Max Area sf 108.55 43.04 16380 51.74 97.84 14760 98.83 56.40 160.75 54.20 62.57 166.66 168.98 Max.Length with 48"Letter ft 27.00 10.50 39.00 12.50 24.00 30.75 24.50 14.00 40.00 13.50 15.50 30.75 28.00 48"Letter Max.Square Footage sf 108.001 42.. 01 156.001 50.001 3.00 98.001 56.00 160.00 54.00 62.001 123.00 112.00 Max.Length with 24"Letter h 39.751 IS.751 48.001 19.331 30.171 3700 30.501 21.501 49.581 20.581 28.901 61 SOL 56.00 24"Letter Max.Square Footage I sf 79.501 31501 96.001 38.671 60.331 74.001 61.001 43.001 99.171 41.171 57.801 123 001 112.00 North Building Unit A B C D E F G H 1 1 K L M(1) N(1) Wall Length ft 40.00 17.00 56.50 21.00 25.00 55.25 35.75 58.42 21.33 17.33 48.00 15.00 150.20 7S30 Wall Height ft 1900 17.00 22.00 17.00 19.00 25.00 1900 25.00 19.00 17.00 2000 17.00 1700 15.00 Wall Square Footage sf 760.00 289.00 1243.00 35700 475.00 1381.25 679.25 1460.42 405.35 294.68 960.00 255.00 255340 1129.50 15%Max Area sf 11400 43.35 186.45 53.55 71.25 207.19 101.89 219.06 60.80 44.20 144 00 38.25 383.01 169.43 Max.Length with 48"Letter ft 28.50 10.50 42.38 13.00 17.50 41.25 25.25 4375 15.00 11.00 36.00 9.50 46.75 23.50 48"Letter Max.Square Footage I sf 1114.001 42.001 169.501 52.00 70.00 165.00 101.001:175.00 60.00 44.00 144.00 1 38.001 187.0-01- 94.00 Max.Length with 24"letter h 38.00 15.00 52501 19.001 23.001 51.2SI 33.751 54421 19.331 15.331 44.001 13.001 114.001 69.25 24"Letter Max.Square Footage I sf 1 76.00 30-001 105.001 38.001 46.001 102.501 67.501 108.831 38.671 30.671 88.001 26.001 228.00 138.50 Notes 1 The above calculations are based upon 3 sf of sign area per lineal foot of tenant linear footage 2. Columns A,B,C,etc.,on this sheet correlate with the respective A,B,C,etc,on the following exterior elevations sheets. Key Notes (1)The square footage for the end cap walls(additional wall signs)are based upon 1.25 square feet per lineal footage of wall with a 15%maximum signage area. Comprehensive Sign Plan Area Calculation Sheet WEST BUILDING A 6 C D IMPARTIAL WEST BUILDING EAST ELEVATION Q5 SCALE:1/8 P-0' WEST BUILDING D F F � t7POO— — —�— 4L 1 EIJI 0 PARTIAL WEST BUILDING EAST ELEVATION A5 SCALE:us r-o^ WEST BUILDING x i F. 1 F- mum ELMK I PARTIAL WEST BUILDING EAST ELEVATION A5 SCALE:1/8'=P-0' WEST MILDING �PARTIAL WEST BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION ��5 SCALE:VB'-P-O' WEST BUILDING FTI Ll )PARTIAL WEST BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION ._ \,�5 WALE 1/8':l'-O' NORTH BUILDING — _ i ci%Mo s Yr — — — — — — — — — — L am PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- 5OUTH ELEVATION A4 5GALE.1/8': I'-0° NORTH BUILDING D E F L �� — - [ — � - �r milml SEE= QPARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- SOUTH ELEVATION A4 SCALE.us r-m° NORTH BUILDING 6 PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- SOUTH ELEVATION Q4 SCALE:1/8 P-0" NORTH MILDINGG K t III 1 11 111 Ilh 11 IT 11 111111 111 Ll PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- SOUTH ELEVATION A4 scALE.ua r-m° NORTH BUILDING - - - - - - - NIES 111H1LMD r` - - .................. -11.............. PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- EAST ELEVATION A4 SCALE vs-= r-m" NORTH BUILDING F - -- - - - - - - t7-- )PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING 1UE67ELEYATION \,Q4 SCALE-1/8". 1'-0" zC-4 CoqpD REi!Y NE Ulama ' w. 6% J '5 CE-An told I.S" m 100-2920 PLNTArMA Un 015111K OU-0111' 393S6 So 'I i FEET IN HC�W7 Al THIS FK,lH' FIT'"ED RWR C4 Z1. 41 J4 bQ rn 1q" C3 77, iv 7- 410 (96 StINSON a VD. u Z. r KOZULLA & ASSOCIATES 7851 METRO PARKWAY, SUITE 121 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 USA TEL 952-345-0258 FAX 952-854-9403 September 8,2011 Ms.Kim Moore-Sykes Assistant City Manager City of St.Anthony St.Anthony City Hall 3301 Silver Lake Road St.Anthony,MN 55418-1699 Re: Fapade and Site Improvement Project St.Anthony Shopping Center St.Anthony.MN Dear Ms.Moore-Sykes, I am writing to you with respect to various Zoning Code and City process items we briefly discussed which may assist the City in upcoming reviews and approvals. Easements—Although there are easements associated with this property with either the City or the County,this project is not requesting any new easement or proposing amendment to any existing easement. Variances—This project is not requesting any variances. Parkins—It is the intent to mill and overlay and restripe the existing parking lot. Concrete curb&gutter landscape islands and parking lot lighting will remain in their current locations. The current Zoning Code requires parking spaces equating to I space per 300 square feet of gross floor area. This property contains three buildings. The north building (46,052 s.f.),the west building(39,388 s.f.)and the Dairy Queen(1,124 s.f.),totaling 86,564 gross square feet. A factor of 300 s.f.suggests 288 parking spaces required. The existing parking lot has a total of 294 spaces,thus meeting current quantity requirements. It is the intent of the proposed parking layout to replicate that of the existing striping layout; however accessible ramp locations and accessible space locations will differ from the existing layout. Space widths vary from 8.78'to 10'depending on the location. Existing striping is 18' long. Because the landscaped islands dimensionally lock the parking lot striping layout,the 18'space length must be maintained. If we find the 18' length can be increased,the design will accommodate. Setbacks—In some cases,this property has zero lot setbacks. It is my understanding that since this project is not a redevelopment project setback restrictions will be grandfathered. Comprehensive Sign Plan—This project submitted a Comprehensive Sign Plan to the City. This Sign Plan was briefly discussed at the August 16 Planning Commission,however not to detail. The City is currently reviewing the proposed property Sign Plan and scheduled to be on the September 20 Planning Commission agenda. Site Drainage—Communications were held with the City and WSB&Associates with respect to storm water management. Given it is the intent to do a mill&overlay rather than a replacement,it was determined an underground storm water management system or specific site retention location not be required. Planning Commission and City Council—Given the project is not requesting any rezoning,variances,easements,etc.,it is the opinion of this office the project is more of an administrative City process,however,this project's representatives are willing to work with City staff,Planning Commission and City Councll,as necessary. Letter to Ms. Moore-Sykes September 8,2011 Page 2 Plan Review and Buildiniz Permit—It is the intention to submit the construction documents to the City for Plan Review upon completion of the design documents. Concurrent to the plan review timeframe,the project will be competitively bidding to multiple general contractors. The successful contractor shall apply and pay for the permit. If there are any items of concern which I failed to address above,please let me know and I will address them for you. Respectfully, Kozulla&Associates,Inc. r J.Kozulla President ' :11� Comprehensive Sign Plan St. Anthony Shopping Center St.Anthony, MN August 2, 2011 St Anthony Shopping Center LLC("Owner") proposes to conform to the City of St.Anthony's Sign Ordinance("Ordinance'/as amended within this document. Please let this document be considered St. Anthony Shopping Center's Comprehensive Sign Plan Tenant Signage The Comprehensive Sign Plan will provide for the following: 1. Allow signage on storefronts up to 60'in length to have 3 square feet per lineal foot of tenant frontage,however,the total signage area shall not exceed 15%of the total wall area frontage. 2. Allow signage on storefronts which exceed 60'in length to have 3 square feet per lineal foot of tenant frontage up to a maximum of 300 square feet, however,the total signage area shall not exceed 15%of the total wall area frontage. 3. Multiple rows of signage text shall be permitted and shall be calculated independently from the row above or below, but total lineal footage shall not exceed a factor of 3;i.e.:the square foot area of row 1 plus row 2 plus subsequent rows(if desired) shall not exceed 3 times that total tenant frontage or exceed 15%of the total wall area frontage. 4. Signage logos shall be included when calculating maximum signage area. 5. All new tenant wall signage will be single wall mounted aluminum channel letters with plastic inserts facing the public street. All new tenant signage will be backlit on painted raceways. Raceway color will match the color of the building background of which the raceway is mounted. The aluminum raceway profile,channel profile, letter size,font,color, etc.,will require property owner approval prior to submission to the City. 6. All existing tenant signs regardless of size,font,color,raceway, etc., shall be grandfathered as acceptable should the existing signage be removed and reinstalled for any reason. 7. Color of channels,color of channel letter inserts and letter font shall be determined by tenant with selection open to all colors and fonts available by signage fabricators. B. Maximum channel letter size will be 48"and minimum channel letter size will be 24". 9. Owner shall have the option to operate lit signs(including existing pylon or future ground signs)such that there is no hourly operation restriction and be able to operate on a 2417 basis if desired. 10. Allow additional wall signs to each of the tenants,but,wall signage area allowed will be maintained at a maximum of 1.25 square feet per lineal foot of wall width yet not exceed 15% of the total wall area. Ground Signage(Site Signage) 1. At the time of this Comprehensive Sign Plan execution,the Owner is not planning for new ground signs and chooses to keep the existing pylon/monument sign intact and make non- structural improvements to the sign. If the Owner would like to install Grounds Signs in the future it will coordinate with City staff.As part of the Comprehensive Sign Plan,the owner shall not be obligated to remove and/or replace the existing site signage or,if the owner determines existing site signage be removed,that it not be obligated to install new site signage. Given this property has two main vehicular entrances,the owner shall have the option to provide a future ground sign at the Kenzie Terrace entrance in addition to the Service Drive entrance. 2011 ComprehensivePlan UpdateAnthony • • • 2011 Proposed Update to Sign Specifications 1989 Approved Sign Specifications 2009 City's Sign Ordinance 1.Allow signage on storefronts up to 60' in length to have 3SF 152.052(B)(1) 2SF of sign area per per lineal foot of tenant frontage;total signage area shall not lineal ROW frontage. Not to exeed exceed 15%of the total wall frontage. 15%wall area. 2. Storefronts that exceed 60' in length can have 3SF per lineal 3.Tenants will be allowed 1 sign per storefront Sign area cannot exceed 150SF or 15% foot of frontage up to a maximum sign area of 300SF not to elevation. Elevations exceeding 60 linear ft. may of wall area for installation. exceed 15%of wall area at installation. have a 2nd sign, also subject to lessor's approval. (152.052 (13)(1)) 2.Signs shall be limited to the wording necessary 3. Multiple rows of signage text shall be permitted;calculated to describe the business trade name, and/or logo, but not to exceed 3x the total lineal tenant frontage or 15%of or logo type.Type styles will not be restricted, wall area at installation. providing they are legible, or within the size and other limitation within this document. 4. Signage logos to be included in calculating maximum sign area. 5.All new tenant signage will be single wall mounted 1.All tenant signs must be individually illuminated aluminum channel letters with plastic inserts facing public neon channel letters w/plastic translucent faces. street.All new signs will be backlit on painted raceways. Painted sign faces not acceptable.Tenant shall submit Racewaycolors will match the color of the building background 2 drawings to the lessor for written a per ROW One identification sign g g g approval, prior to per ROW frontage. on which the racewayis mounted.The aluminum raceway the fabrication of any sign.Tenants are free to select profile, channel profile, letter size,font, color, etc., will require any sign contractor they choose, subject to Lessor's property owner approval prior to City submission. approval. 6. Existing signs regardless of size, font, color, raceway, etc., shall be grandfathered as acceptable should the existing signage be removed and reinstalled for any reason. The acrylic face color of all letters shall be one of the following: Red Rohm & Haas Plexiglas 2415 7. Color of channels, color of letter inserts and letter font shall glue 2114 be determined by tenant with selection open to all colors and Orange 2119 fonts available by signage fabricators. Green 2030 All returns on letters will be painted with Cream DuPont 4296-D99.Trim cap will be 1" gold. 8. Maximum channel letter size will be 48" and minimum 2. Signs shall be limited to wording necessary to channel letter size will be 24". describe the business trade name and/or logo. 9. Owner shall have the option to operate lit signs, including pylon sign and any future ground signs. No hourly sign operation restriction; operating on 24/7 basis. 10.Additional wall signs will be allowed to each tenant but the maximum additional wall signage will be restricted to a max of 1.25 SF per lineal foot of wall frontage but not exceed 15%. 'K"a.� fir•�r- !Y. $0 i t � F • rs�t_ ww LG�fti: rtrt9su:gu., 4 ti 1 (it,4 ��lrli i7,1{�11�l;Y�i,7, tlx�l fiE h �,� —tel { x t��y - F°• fi%'�z..I °��I���i. 1. ,� .,<w C� �Y�K� .f Fly,f 1 -...� .e,7lt+��V.,6 c,.r•r� r ;,, , ry _ t ,P,-TF,.•�r r� .Ae P. v r,r ..r x 'al4 F.r,,., „� Y cf$;}�.t r �! +;Jt 5= r,r a ti -.W `1+4Y-.y .i'� „ ..' '�" �x fe: t >.y a,3..: {.,.,•?'�'"+e�� �-CaS-? S q dt s a+x -s e,�'a �; 11 Ka.. '�� �F. +4.(•e A, 2A,. � � ��l ,kr I." IM-'i,:i. .'*'� �.� �1�+ ...y� -''1 7d,' ,, N-,.. :�.�. •. , .. .: ! .:.' -v� �� -7 .'4.`..� R y��i.tl"':.L'.F�:"�)-5 �...r,i � .! �� �, kt �.y N�5 �„ '�?'��� I N'KC i'.., �'HtF7. .,"Iv�,:: �y� '�• •^ ,�.,r+➢y q' .,. � �.-k: �.h, �._,�..i.. ., .. ,: '`°5.:+'�' '; a. ��. 1 5.a- nx z s ti. . r l A 't!+.. tr'�U} ... r" L ,.� k ai:.t s. `„'i,:,•,R',r'�"ry-�� � F`:;i P _,xra.� 1 t�z1'-I ,�..�F 1.t�, y df )•1+ ,[qq�''k� �lif ?:�y�,.�F ;^t d �°+�`'`�,�. • i_rt� ,'� 6 ..y, ;;'.,;, -�'.' t r. <rt`,z„V ^^"- kif.w�,?' �' kx -..��A � a!a�ya( moi,tk.ti is a '�Sot!• ,�i d. ,;,. .,.:' .:' y'^f Hrp d�I+ tth 'gW'I""kFr °yo��• as '.;� rI ,., �` 1 .-o '� C ,''e�l � z�h'x!' al F �,���'°� Y .:� f lar°.''Y f"�.„,eNd� n� f�t�J", (¢�y�zyy �yr �` � � 4 tic .a,")�# s. � °+�'�7;t•�^^S� .s t,« � '1� � — r'� .'X+�M� 2 1 „.:.�' � v.IIS{-� q F° d wi r - A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN 2011 St. Anthony Shopping Center 2912 Pentagon Drive TYPO L SW AFEA 4'MAX WN LEUER NEWT VRHN SW AFEA OF 3 5F/I LF OF F'AWET LD67N I - - J F - . J IBM PARTIAL WEST BUILDING EAST ELEYATION A5 SCALE: 1/8"= 1--0" - - -1 L - - - - - J - - - - L - - - - J I PARTIAL WEST BUILDING EAST ELEVATION Q5 SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" rams JL Lj PARTIAL WE5T BUILDING EAST ELEVATION Q5 SCALE: 1/8 P-0" rrPrAL W.4 ASA +'rout slur LETrER YFYArr WIfHP GrA ASA CF 3 SF/I LF OF PARAPET LDOTR — — — Hi den yeas es _ IG0 � — - - L - - - - -'lei s#or-a - - - - -J HRS & HE Li PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- SOUTH ELEVATION Q4 SCALE: 1/8"= P-0" & HE LIN PER LIPJ - � - - J L- - - - - - J "L L PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- SOUTH ELEVATION A4 SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" — _ — e nep n C u ty LiRa� St Ard iony ' - - - � - - - - - - - - - - � r� ILL �� LONTESSO I SEP b AJ I E Ea 7 A ... ...... ................. ................................ ....... .... . LLH r�� -M , - :11[j. PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- SOUTH ELEVATION A4 SCALE: 1/8"= P-0" I IT 11 11 IT11 11 IT 11 1111111 - r CNTESSO' I S E P BY STP L - 111 11111 [loll 1111M - .................. . .......... X-1.1...... .......... . .. ....EMEME......... .. . ........ PARTIAL NORTH BUILDING- SOUTH ELEVATION Q� SCALE: 1/8 1'-0" TYPICAL WA AREA 4'MAX 50 LETTER 1EICd7T wnm SIM AREA OF U5 6F/I LF OF PARAPET L910T A PA NTESgRRI �HILD ARE Hill III IIIII IT 11111 11 1111 IN,ll� Hilill,lilill IT 1111 Hill 11 2 PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION A4 SCALE: vs° = r-m° s b SIGN CRITERIA FOR ST. ANTHONY SHOPPING CENTER GENERAL-The Sign Criteria as set forth herein, shall govern all outdoor signage to be used or displayed by the Tenants of "ST. Anthony Shopping Center". This will insure quality signing throughout the Center, while maintaining pleasing architectural standards and fairness to all tenants. Consideration will be given to allowing maximum flexibility of sign designs, individuality and creativity within the limits described below: Sign Criteria/Specifications-All Criteria/S�cifications-All Tenant signs must be designed, fabricated and installed to comply with the following criteria and specifications: 1. All Tenant signs must be individually illuminated neon channel letters with plastic translucent faces. Painted faces are not acceptable. 2. Signs shall be limited to the wording necessary to describe the business trade name and/or logo, or logo type. Type styles will not be restricted, providing that they are legible, or within the size and limitations describdd below and meet the Lessor's approval. 3. Tenants will be allowed one (1) sign per storefront elevation. Elevations exceeding 60 Linear feet my have a second sign, also subject to Lessor's approval. 4. Unless unusual circumstances warrant special permission from the Lessor, the signs shall be limited to a single line, the total width of which shall not exceed 80% of the Tenant's store front width. The minimum letter height shall be 16". The minimum stroke width shall be 3 3/8". a. Letter Channels (Returns)-All letter returns shall be formed from aluminum in minimum thickness of .040 inches. Depth of channels shall be 6". All interior surfaces must have a splash coat of white for reflective purposes. Outside color will be Dupont 4296d-99 Cream. b. Letter Backs-Letter backs are to be made of aluminum of the same or greater thickness as that of the letter channels. Armorply, plymetal, foam, styrene, or any other inflammable material shall not be used under any circumstances. C. Letter Faces-All letter faces are to be pigmented Plexiglas, or equal acrylic sheets with a minimum thickness of .125 inches. d. Face Retainer-All letter faces must be attached to the letter channels using trimcap material, (1 inch) trim color gold. 6. Installation a. There are 3 or more rows of SGR-8961 extruded aluminum channels embedded in the background, 13" inches center to center running the full length of the sign area. b. The letters are to be attached to those channels using STD No. 33.10 snap-in clips' furnished by the sign contractor. (Except for the letter I, all letters shall have a minimum of three clips, although more clips may be required,• depending upon the size of the letter. ) C. No letter attachment holes through the SGR-8961 channels and no welding to those channels will be permitted. 7. Electrical Requirements a. Letters shall be internally illuminated with neon tubing, 15MM, or 13MM using 30 MA transformers for neon illuminated letters and 60 MA transformers for for Argon illuminated letters. b. The required transformers shall be mounted on the back side of the fascia directly behind the letters and housed in a sheet metal box 7" X 7" X 18". The secondary wiring (GTO-15) running from the transformer to a letter will be contained in 1/2' Liquid tight flex conduit. That conduit shall be mechanically fastened to both the transformer box and the back to the letter track, by the use of Appleton 1/2" Connectors, #ST-50 or Equal. No holes shall be drilled in the SGR-8961 channel for any purpose except for running secondary wiring from the letter to the transformer. Those holes shall be 7/8 inches in diameter in order that, at a later date, they may be plugged with a standard snapin blank for 1/2 inch knock outs, Appleton #S50 or equal. C. All wiring pertaining to the transformers, the SGR-8961 channels, and the letters shall be done in accordance with the latest edition Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Standards for Electric Signs and bear the required U.L. Labels. The use of P-K, or similar, neon electrode receptacles will not be permitted. d. No penetrations for attachments in the finished fascia surface will be permitted under any circumstances . u � 8. �proval Tenant shall submit two (2) drawings to the Lessor for written approval, prior to the fabrications of any sign. Lessor must also approve Tenant's Sign Contractor as having previously met the criteria for performing acceptable job standards over a period of not less than three years to assure compliance with our specifications. Any construction accomplished by the Tenant or Sign Contractor, without having the Lessor's written approval and not in compliance with these specifications will be done at the tenant's own risk. Tenants are free to select any Sign Contractor they choose, subject to Lessor's approval. Lessor suggests that Tenants select Sign Contractors willing to give acceptable warranties on their work. A. All returns on letters will be painted with Cream Dupont 4296-D99. B. Trim cap will be 1" gold C. The acrylic face color of all letters shall be one of the following: a. Red Rohm & Haas Plexiglas 2415 b. Blue 2114 C. Orange 2119 d. Green 2030 D. Special clips STD No. 33.10 will be used to mount the letters. Snap-in channel covers STD. No. 33.20 will be used to meet the Underwriters Laboratories requirements. Both of these items are manufactured by Signgraphics . ALL fit- TENSION CABELS SNAPPED I INTO TOP GROOVE INSTALL SNAP-IN ( TO ASSURE TIGHT CLIP 8Y PLACING IT FRICTION F)TTING, ) N LOWER GROOVE AND WRAP SPOT'S APPROX. THEN PULLING 8" C, C. WITH ELF_C, � _ TAPE) FORWARD AS SHOWN ,- I" RD. HD, - II1 RIBBED NI=CK M. S, ALUM, LETTER \ ' I' LONG SNAP- I N TRACK SGR - 8961 . CLIP STD, N0.33,10 -- ALUM, FASCIA SNAP- I N CLIP DETAI L 2"0 L I Q U I p - TIGHT FLEA, 4 (P WASHERS CONDUIT .SNAP - IN COVER sTD. NO. 33.20 USED BETWEEN LETTERS I AS NEEDED TO COVER ALL HI - TENSION CALLES �9 Z O CONN F_CTOR A PPLETON ST-So OR EQUAL WIRING $ - COVER DETAI L SIGN CRITERI'A APPENDIX A 5T. ANTHONY 5HOPPI NG ' CENTER ,s% l9n r phi DETAILS FOR LETTER TRACK; S6R-8961 ® DESIGNED FOR U.L. APPROVED WIRINQ 10011 MILLER RD, • P. O, BOX 38668 DALLAS, TEXAS 75238 5CALZ PATE DW=� ,o 214/3493131 FULL SI ZE - 15- 8q A STAFF REPORT To: Chair and Planning Commission Members From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Assistant City Manager Date: October 18, 2011 Subject: Autumn Woods Assisted Living Facility Requested Action: Planning Commission Plan Review Date Application Received: N/A Property Address: 2580 Kenzie Terrace Zoning District: PUD —R-4 60-Day Expires: November 7, 2011 Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent: No X Future Action: Public Hearing Background: Mr. Greg Bronk and the LaNel Group have been meeting with Staff to complete their preliminary plans for the proposed construction of an assisted living facility with approximately 72 assisted living units at 2580 Kenzie Terrace. Mr. Bronk and Ms. Caitlin Goff have also come before the Planning Commission at its September 20, 2011 meeting for a concept review of the site and facility plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the site plan and provided feedback to this proposed project. The next step will be for the LaNel Group to present their final development plan in a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Staff will work with Mr. Bronk and Ms. Goff to schedule that public hearing. Attachments: • Written description of the proposed Assisted Living Autumn Woods Project • Renderings and color drawings of the proposed facility and landscaping Autumn Woods Assisted Living is a 72 unit assisted living facility, offering a variety of unit types to attract a number of different residents; those needing CareSuite services, looking to downsize in home size to Studio or 1 bedroom units or couples looking for larger 2 bedroom units. The building has a wide variety of common area spaces. Those spaces include an outdoor patio, fitness room, beauty parlor, 'spa'rooms, Movie Theater, dining room and full service kitchen, in- house Chapel, craft room, library and a number of Parlors and sitting areas to promote social activities. Landscaping on the site will be to the high standard known at other Lang-Nelson communities. A variety of perennial and shrub planting as well as Deciduous and Coniferous Tree Planting. This will give the building a more residential feel and also create natural barriers from the existing buildings and homes around the area. The owners of the proposed development together with their Architect and Civil Engineer have had the opportunity to meet with the members of St. Anthony's public works team, including engineering as well as the Fire Marshal. We believe these meetings have helped develop this building into a cohesive plan that will benefit not only the existing neighborhood but the community as a whole. Parking for the building will consist of 18 underground stalls for residents and staff, as well as 13 street parking stalls on the North East end of the building on Kenzie and 13 striped parking stalls on the south west end of the building. Parking will also be available via our existing parking lot at Autumn Woods, which is under common ownership. This area has 59 stripped parking spaces which are seldom used by residents. To expand on the parking breakdown of the building; Lang-Nelson's 8 other Assisted Living communities were extensively surveyed to obtain the number of staff and residents needing parking. Common stats include 17% of the units in Lang-Nelson's additional building use a parking space (more often than not to park a car that is never or very seldom driven by an Assisted Living resident). On average we have 36 staff members needing parking at varying times of the day. If 36 staff members needed parking and 17% of the proposed 72 units equating to 12 residents needed parking, totaling 48 cars needing parking we are above our number of slotted spaces by 34 stalls. Attached is a graph outlining this summary: Parking Breakdown Existing AW 59 Surface Spaces 7 unusable after construction 14 used by existing resident TOTAL 38 Proposed AW II 13 Surface Spaces NE Kenzie 13 Surface Space SW end of building 18 Underground Spaces TOTAL 44 TOTAL: Both buildings 82 Staff needed parking 36 Resident needed parking 12 TOTAL EXTRA 34 It's important to note, those 36 staff members listed above would be new jobs for the community. These positions would be a mix of housing operations, maintenance, full time and part time office workers as well as kitchen & dining room wait staff and a number of Health Care positions including Home Health Aides and Registered Nurses. This does not include the obvious number of construction jobs that will be created building this 72 unit building. All job opportunities will be a great asset to the City of St. Anthony community. W ST.CHARLES zsm 2513 2527 2521 2525 2s 2so 2617 7701 77 27 2713 CATHOLIC PAHL AVENUE CHURCH 2500 2506 2612 252D 25Z 2604 2606 2612 2616 270 2704 0 7712 O ' Q SCHOOL ZO �1g�� O U 0 ^d Q J o*ti w ti J 2501 2509 2513 2517 2521 2525 2801 2609 [2613]2617 :2701 7705 Z/09 2713 2801 O 27th AVENUE NE m 2512 2516 2520 2524 2600 2604 26118 261 16 27 21 27 271 280 2812 2653 2404 2406 241 241 2420 � z O(D -- 3s z � a0� LOWRY GROVE A. h p 1 ,�0 �,yp ti SUNSET 1 LOWERY AVENUE maw -1 uvn vt►n Ind cc,�C AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING Kenzie Terrace St.Anthony,MN r PRELIMINARY �! ONLY 8-12-2011 north i Site Plan ,� tf JAY P.HNELSON r ��� _ ,� �► _, rte. Site Plan Ino scale) 612-812—4628 M01 MA\Z\TABU EVA D. StTT T ST ll' PANV ARJ S S J 36 Autumn Woods LNing UNIT SGNEVULE A6Elsled _ ------------------ .�'-��,r��_r �) -Tom?----------- ---------- I---------- -�--. 5i lzq 7LI!--I ILTIi7I ..Ilii: pp 7l Lv JAY F.WILSON IJ zu*r] v' \ I us i •�e.lVl� ;L�'•� t.. NORTH tr. -------------------------- PREUMIWY ONLY '*►� SR PLAN *1 Wrirj 09:16 --� y,• ' r 06'12/2011 'a rr JPN k t1 JPN � � _ AREA IMAGE-(NO SCALE) as inauu� — e Autumn WDDAg Assisted living s UNEXCAVATED 1 I� ✓ Y�MwI,IM I. -- oFF. MECHANICAL BEAUTY , FITNESS TAFF /ELECTRICAL -'F BREAK 1, I� LOBBY - �" MECf1.r i L CORRIDOR ----------- -w _- TRASH / G m UNEXCAVATED.--.—._-—__ _ ___ _-_ r p_ ___ ._ ��., 9 1 JAY T.NtLSON OM MUNm ELEV. ih EQ ELEV. `> % EQ BLILDBID ,I m B70RACiE I _ I I i I r z c CL MAINTENANCEII ���Y LOWER NORTH LEVEL ....w 011 OB'1T/70011 r M im ��Y JPN �LBWE11ll48 � - A2 B Fz� 4 --------------- 5 6 l 9 10 � 11 12 13 + I I I inn Woods -�- -_ -�_+ ----*' --- -- - - -— ---- - bbd Living - Ass WI ---- ------ ----------- j _� �. -�_.i_..� ......... L. , T- -T-F7 .F' UVHO . OFF. CONF. �OF'F. rACn' a LIVING/' CFI'- t L11�' -I oIR. DINING o• SUITE 2 3 _- - .I- -- -�-� - AC' IEStttjjj _ �r AREA l�, — UIT - ^ ITE SUITE PROTECTED ., �` CHAPEL woo, ' Int PAT". y _Su _ F .. OFF. I �I OFFT .. .._...� .1551) SSA ISS-3 (Ss 3) CONF. JAY�.N[LliON -_-.- WK. �... �. W" 5531 (9s1 (S$-1 ISS'tl - _ T VOI.TAOE :-MAIL 2) (SS-2) ,STAFF uur I X10 9 8 - 6 S PARLOR 5 a) VEST. SUITE SUITE SUITE 'I SUITE SUI SUITE � � )�' THEATER IN _ AST E RCADE IC31�ORANo FlRE ACCESS PATIO P..,... ..-J F:.... PM m ......,,- LANE/WALK PATH _ 'LIBRARYComm -- err:R°°wlil- fl AREA c-;a. �.- � ' nae •.�-��. .� - _ VA _OININOp_ v-! . OR KrrcHEN COOK UNE PRELIMINARY ONLY KITCHEN LEVEL ONE NORTH WAS _ OW 1212111 • JPN A3 f vv roar • � ---� eceo �..wt N1tloN A7i0 'tle(U AYIINIlM73lId �..�Et ' - ^u-L el� tlea>r--> 4 t1,.p K rJ tle(t I � 1 9t0 .Zt I 6lGIZ7 F I � i M tL It 9 I I(z-t eFR j real � 1 '-+IUD I I I I 0 a-Lel 41 SLI `Ad8(U— 1 M I �r (C S) olanls 4t 01113 Ll ¢�,� c ® i a frL 81 �_ ft Lel 46.19) iiaiiei'i"v � i ,, q`+n I nua (NDitivd —. - — - � o. 'tlB(t)QF NOSUN'1 AVfa Is a❑ 8nl 17- { rLeiireiii — tl ) tl is de`wo sl xgtel tle t orass anis olonls: 6utnll Petslssv spooM uwntnv Autumn Woods Assisted L,tting n 10 1clud� 2- j, STUDIO UDIO 9 ' 1 0R ! �, I 1 BR 1e,9) STUDI _ (1)BR 3 ra 15,1 y,Y ($191 a,. TUR 'A'STUDI - J j nR T 21 0 FARLOR�F- i t9 - •. _ ea LAUNDRY ¢un JAY P.NELSON (s .,..::.!.1i c ..o+� 16 UDIO STOP.-;;- S3) TOP.Sa) ID H� t0 ® Ljre Btft<` i 71�gn3- ry ,7 (1)BR.A(_ p ® o I I ,i 0- C3 I .—.1a C3 � (1)BR. PRELIMINARY "(s") ONLY LEVEL THREE NORTH W.e O81Lj • JPN s^r� JPR u!uua s • A5 p Autumn Woods Aset,#ad Luting I e45 6 � l _ 'PSTUDIO (S O 1 BR ATTIC L 1 a t 7 E'B sz _ ST ale,.,31 I ATTIC 2 3 - - lB,4 F -tel. � Sbait I (1)BR.(BI-10) _ - A'STUDI 18, J J(1)BR (1)BR. �- (1)BR '-�' - I ILWDawa A.r.ul TIVLiSON L STUDIO P�v: it r (Bal (+)BR i I`• a� I 14 11 (1)BR.±1 -- -� - 12P(a .. I � i F' Stair 10' d ATTIC r-�11 -%(1)BR. ' PREUNINARY ® ONLY LEVEL FOUR NORTH OB1T/20,1 ��• j_M • .IPId A6 f.I'- ALA=n Woods Assisted LHMg 77 �- �J. PRELMMARY ONLY ROOF PLAN NORTH os�iv zoi i JPN JPN 3 Autumn woods Assisted Living 'T J-ff ------- I H8N = - �PEI0 - 8 L rDUL_-MNIoRLT w,enxa� ,"rortiN eLewrgN —.- u.cDNrwL JDiNr reeuar xA.rNECAsr sxu.suL cawse, w.reRrAei.e - s•-�Da,iaNwa cola••i "�•�'"" �.RANDDN AsxLAR coLoa n-e•AccENr :5.�r�ineeD rnn�r Duet+u+Dxe+w�ri' t9.b•rmER LIwENT-IN-OTNEI•MIOfNb ro sNonN AND•EwueD. �c.rxeca�T.nuv.ANO reNraaAro 50EFIT rANEL SA.AbMALT S•IN6LES \. bwMM�ZLEµD Da LAr.L/3NIN6 _ _ -—_— - -—-—-— � �l�� DL.aINA•6+TK Aa+S-b•xIbN rENLINb - pp.ONNANENTK xNDN b'-P NxbN rp�LINb bE./NI6N SLNEEN FBILIN6 ,'�.!riS�y y.ry• NK ERENC nZNDOrlS b � I SIDELI6NM AS IMDiLAro AL.rAllINI3NED TNlAMK GNGK bLIDx116 rano pOa[ PRELIMINARY ® - - 1 — 8®— =1�: �:�• -'�' m.xNsuvro ovoeNvo bwueE woa ONLY ry�d m�����-���� I�-I�ryry— _ - •e.Amc nxNvon w?,� �D BUILDING ELEVATIONS nA•cewn�nve YULE MpINTEp rxxruR[ w�� W7e OY'792071 - _____ a NT�r e__ �`•Nr�N �y •� --------------7 --- ----7 1—m—u(.�w�'tS, >Zc.rtonEN u.ouc M JPN --�r' SRKXEr } nIN l QS EALL LL bRADES pTMFIN65 OR AWl''IN6 AND TO .FF FY EXTFNT Of BVILDIN6 NNNfwN MATERIALS. Ausimn Woods - Assisted LMng c HEM � e JAY T.NRrlON � y � A•CMli lCi i-.eDUd e.PVRTgN —— N.BnI! r1 U.LONTROL JOZMT _— �.FREWi 92u.SILL aM5E. ~ HATE T18LE ' DDM A%.LAR WLOR•1 za.RANDOw ASHLAR CALOR.r-e•.ccdT _ _ _—_ _ __ —F.. —err Ai TeNrv�rteD IT T-M wRDarANEL _ •f /'S .1G•fIEIR fD�dT rbLIA A+�D rIRIDRATID r —'Y�TS� SOFlRT•AlIEL „ Li �I C �® Y.AbOr'rW.1 a.rDrbLEa • I — —6 _ ��. _ RA..ecxAN cAL LOUreR — - - - ---' - � _ r_ r ROM S-b'NIfM rCMLINb •RLQ']- 1j. ryi 'tr }. } l-• - fs 00.WNI.ndTK m-6-?NT6N RNLIM6 e J — � � ��_�_ � u.sREFINT4NEp TNERwµdtENc nIprone m.M ETK DDDR-aLAUMb AND PPEUMMMY zIDELlbxrs a v�OtureD .®.s.._.�.�.—_�..�. •�•—"1O�'oi�9 ,c•FREErxIZNeD rnR.rK sae F sLmlMb OIiY BUILDING •dwu*ea OV6rNEAD aARAae WOR A ILRNWR ELEVATIONS iO�A�S�TECL BOLLARD MRRWr Oe:fe _ _ 09'1?12011 :.we9f EL@VRTIDN —-- __-. -- ru.YOECORATIVE RALL HgMTEp FI%TlR! `Y JPN ,• cFF GNSL EHbrNFFR_rNb aru JPN DRAMN69 FOR ALL bRADES r' ,�rLAbroLe rwF wrt Hist* tL ATO ,TO C,LOC,�L 3 RTFY E ENT OF ElL2L_nMb ix.RDOr MALRBT �� HI.TFRTAr t � MY1WaW ® =GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION Project AUTUMN WOODS _ ASSISTED WING LEGEND . ,." NOATN PROPOSED F%ISTINO Location ®_ o $T AMHONT,MN 554 18 Client \ e J �"—� —,', LANG NELSON W EXISTING BUILDING o -- / FFFE=917 83 — / I k BSMT=90817 Architect �� `- ` • �_ --_• JAY P.HI NELSON ARCHITECT 21 r✓ „\ a�p�✓ -." W'�Y;`r�' -. _ Civil Engineer nfra PF D06aL •• Mpq�Mv �4 ®/ �,• •• �p� .lo xRii�iii �"- eBENO1MAR16 rrsiaum �Y'®� j CertMicatlon =GENERALCONSSTRUCDON NOTES ��•���®�v� ®��`«`_ y .0 9� �• .,�,. '�/f J 115' ,.� I � �amw n..m.wuomnx .�. Pg� �\ / � �/ •"t�R� uE.J°"�,' ', \i mmmLnRanmur,�onwm,m.omn EXISTING BUI .�.�n .mn..... ..a.Pw. / y"' •••_ .: % s .,c FFE=916 1•M� Summary• BSMT�906 Fi l --eEu•5KN1urnw; - - - f f I1-�',,fi,.,r_-/ �>c.,E.-- 1I�Y ���E4�pn-,uj II D------�-IIr�.•r.<w,.~E,/-II oam.�. ,•, I •.nmrW� f_ — mm..c.aoO,,. RemvlswlonS.WH«.misdlmt.ol«/ rKy_Q'-7� QF .a � • I I i I �1 I i I � l— � .�NnoA ,m � \�— •-_ - - -•------ - ./ I I I i i r. L0669—. — ——-�_�—- o..Y.�.a.mP.„.,��.m�,a>�L,��.�n.� �,a`��otiti c� ti � � � I � �� _ _ - :-� .,•'W��., �®..�m,>ron.a,wnw �.n.L.�u,..o.»am...,Y.n. �C SQO,�'D. —SHEET INDEX REMOVAL KEY NOTES eGENERAI SITECLEARINGANDREMOVALS NOTES SHEET DESQIPIION E p•"'^"'••�•••"'••• _ m®.n.LT.P, ,o.n...,.,.va....lnm,.....,,.m.o,�.,..«...nm mNomor+s.owanloN ww Sheet TRIe © N«mL.. N«..mm,m �n «nN �..a...�..mwwn.~an. �� �, .Y TITLE SHEET, I () �nul u 9.E PAxxp.S9CTDF/_•[E�FTFKL PNwnu PIAN o„ DmXL«.uDALNoxmo EXISTING p u •wrm,n unnwnan.n ammvm ID DN'IDOX LSEmMmmNmOl NO1FSLRTARS a IO m.a„a...p,.....P...P.��..n.n,•.�R..... Q.�.n,.�Pn..N�....,.uo...o.....�. uo, ,..Lw„DIE�I�N.N CONDITIONS& SITE CLEARING cum vaLE*Nu PLAN ®w Sheet No. Revision m .N C1.01 I p w.a,.L,«..,� v o.n,e.Nim . .o,.NN„«�.noo�.w..�.a...,.,,o..e.r»I•,... Project No. ®wanNom.oL..mLn NooY,w.m w..«® —� Project UTUM ASSISTED WING • ® -.,. _e..w�w�...v®m..�w.m.w- Location •ar ® o _ KEPME TERRACE e Sr ANTNONY,NM 5541K ..r,P�--„ ,i/ ,.• •/ '�I\ .__•.,� ��a.��,....,._�®��s. Client LANG NELSON FEE EXISTING BUILDING _� FFE=917 83 w_® _��.v.w...- Architect / t BSMT=90817 �p•- �` JAY P.NELSON ARCHITECT o ♦ '6 _ ® v®® — run argmnm ��V� f/ ��'� •/ 3 �per, �W '�•Y ,e��®�p s� m�o..v�m i ,s / "6�'• $ _ .�.�.. .. m..._ Civil Engineer ��,�� ;- f .�;� ,�. ��- _ _ �,• -'-�.� _®_ ® _ _ ®® _ - infra -K,';'�,�-';" :, .: ,<�r %. � ..,�_ vim^^^ m:�•'� CerNflcation •F, A" /.i F .✓ v ,� ^ pp'' t°. �..m�[mlaa I11 �.®. 0m® .s®.o®d w. v.vw,....m.o0....• r..._.w._ �✓ /� - n.`) yl�n I -.oma...�—.w._ _-_. EXISTING BUI' FFE=916 Summery • td �.. ..i,,•sii_`: ,� _ .- tom., ,., '� BSMT=906 _ ` ra . ` �.+•�.; •- n I^� I r, �� `�._ Revision History � •+r l., ' "d.T.., L.f �I �I I i�i;e.l I < I .r�o' 1 s saMml l e.a.l.� I E.-.u• � �. I nem. EHF�^w I E�."w'.( V �oem,r, A1 I I Sheet Title GRADING PLAN r =GRADING KEY NOTES I Q— i Q— Q_ Q_ Q— Sheet No. Revision i C2.01 Protect No. i Project AUTUMNWOODS ASSISTED WING Location •�••, .Exp TERRACE ST ANTHONY.MN 55418 Client LANG NELSON 1 + EXISTIN, BUILDING // ""9'"°' • '1 FFE=917 93 Architect eSMT=90817 JAY P.NELSON ARCHrrECT - '� • 5 i nm aruY.arA,ome aP Civil Engineer °1 infra ,/'Ff l PRlp04D}1,1414 W!Y / 1}pYaO WO l4i51 1008 9]J - ���wwm f _ 10Ku LENL 91] P POOJdS 4e� = J� ...� ... 'i b• !"° l�±: - JJJ t.ertlRcatlon uzzmY ®.� 'r is"%\ a. • (,": . EXISTING if c eu1z;A w FFE=916 i Summa ry �/.. .a�H N,�,a�'S..,r I-a��,.c,... isv;,;•%Rip_P: ,- d � \ l\ eSMT=906 ✓`, RemslonHistory `r rwwn �I ,°yo,... I I� I� I •.EP � \ w Nwb4lTr.nt°, 1 C.O�-3' Ss I I I Sheet Title =GRADING KEY NOTES /p "°'°"'�' -u''' SITE PAVING, ®tea .4.a /p.mY. ..�».......,. . �_ I SPOT ELEV.,& KENZ p,P.m,.4,�44141w \a,.,..,.,....,.,m...�°.,°„.�. _..mm...o .®..� woo JETERR. PARK PARKING PLAN Sheet No. Revision .._.. _-\ ..m,,......° ,A°„�....._...e. ......°. oma,...® 3 PAVEMENT°SERIONS �a 8 TYPICAL PARKING LANE SECTION ON 1(ENLE TERRACE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER Project No. p e o - =IEGEN J,, D ro® Project ,VF .eo w.�M.oo.m,mr ® �—•� AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING mvr,wt,La� �m.aa No.rx �� •� a.m ® Location STHANE TERRACE ' ,r� �n [.mm lroo rash H51.9 <D Vn-LO ST ANTHONY,OMY, MN 55!18 Cliente ®n LANG NELSON ,✓-•. - �t•/ � / !'�_ j� m.w..mro.,..m SB n..nlmY� an. �� ,� � -t:: / �� 1��✓1 rwra...,mua..o..®rc.w T5 E JSTING EUILDINrmwMw N =SEQUENCE FFE=917 33OrcoNSTRucnoN Architect BSMT=90317 JAY P.NELSON ARCHITECT / ;►� �° ",'"--^ CIvII Engineer i '�' '�••� ��q S • ,�\ ' ' =G.NEM!CONSTRUCTION NOTES Wnfra r Tr_ '� n - �.�- xv mxiermweu mmmwa�swn„rcnmwmrw.m R3 wawl�w,wwAN iV" �ew�li,tl KI ILEA VU / F 'I `muuxm.w.aa.n vnmmrr.� v,tnm n.unr¢nno.a xa OY nL.®� L 912 _`�- u .Ina I xrmrwnnY m warm wmw r�.rowura _ ,p.x• 'L✓f � _,� mw.nL.ram.m..m....,.�..rrnr'e"ir.�w...w°"m..oL� r... F' 9 a• Certification r'�nr 1. 4 `' ! \ pmmwc,o NMrronaro�.Wwm.wlrx�rR �+�^ EIJSTING BUI' ., d k /• — .mr .,,a•_.csm a�.wwm...w.00...�mn.mwr..�r q- x. FFE=916I Summary nw,wep� BSM T=906 ..nF =GENERAL NOTES - � "' k_ r,p'"�-';7r®' w• a__ .a.«...';n.�nrr/-fes..__ -'�_� _ mrm�,..m.. r.� .errr `-�'�----- - -�_ --------`� I- Revision History 'Z'r'- - - T;P11 F+ - /f;.,n.i f.i,u.% .N¢ - 1� .m..mr.�.n...�ro.m..�`..omr...0 mn.r.m.r,..wo..A�ma o.ww srw,mli...rra READY MIX CONCRETE TRUCK AND BATOI PLANT WASH-OW WATER— _ 1 1 `\ ,` o.wma,,.rmi¢tvn rommnwmrert..m wrrxw,,.rowm � \ Mnmm �mnmmr�mmm mwv, �Q,'ti�' 1 1 I I .mNiO!1TO CONTRACTOR m..awrtam, off•_ C' I I� "' I tai:+u.•, I �� � f - "' I I I r .m.un,wv.e.u..momnmron.o mumwr...rre.amanm T KEYNOTES —A0.EA SUMMARY IN ..wmvc w�1d'w"'M®�'�r�'��®w� `m Sheet ntle EROSION& j SEDIMENT �SOILEROSION SEDIMENT TIONCONTROLOPEMTIONTIMESCHEDULE maxum u,rt ONSTxURi0x Sf0ufNlE w SEI rov D6 i o CONTROL PLAN ---------- II ° 0 nmomw.u. Mxn�,wrc,vwnn,o wru non —EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS OUAMTES= .... Sheet No. Revision C3.01 I.rI wxawl ro,f mx,Mno9a.aD...xLmxm.c,o,ro cowuf TMu..,w ncr.s.fuHc mo,fcr xxFDUIE Project No. �� Project AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING EROSION&SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES&DETAILS/"5RE MAP" Location r., r s.. 51_An.honY %ENIE1ftlRA(:f 5i INA,ESS4ltl r Client ile O, LANG NELSON m>•<_..w �'od a. .._,�,„„,.r.�r..no, °' ,,.�.,..�_�.°..,.o..._.a..�..,.:�...�..�...,,......... ....,�..�,�°.—...,��.��.�.,..^.......,..�..�... ........, sm Ir� i —�..,.....,........ ®/ g� N xss,sF J SITE r, .n,,.,,9..,.....,,.........�,...:.,..,...,...,.>~.,.M,..,-,m ...,...rT,�,_,...-..,..,.�.-...,...,.�._.,,. .� .�.....,...,_..,.M,. 9 � ~C SITE. tea..... a...�...,...^..- .,-..,.,,...�,.W_.., V...._,.._`......, ...r. o-,..,., ` J Architect ...�a................................,..,,......,,_ .......,...., ,........._. .., ate ,� JAY P.NELSON .....,.....���.,_....,.....-. ..,,.,_.-,..,. ,....,..,.,......�......,.....,.,�...,... ..........,,, ...I...,�...> _ _ ARCHITECT ° ..n.u...�...i..rt�.w,u...wnw.......o..�^,.......�._ .,,.� ....�,.���a..�......._w.,........�..,,..,�w.. ��,..�._.....r,.., .1—S LOCATI0N MM .e S�SYMAR tin re..��.a.r.uo. ....,.,�.......,,,. �,..m.,.w.,....,.,,�__._,—..�.`, �— ...�..,,..�.��.,..,._.,,°....��...,.,......_��. �....,...,.....,�.� �.......,�.....,�,.,__....... Civil Engineer _..,.. .. ....-. wnfra v as m.Ano ro. — .m..,.... "'...,......_.—�....�...._...,... ,.. "\ o..,.-u.,m..®. tin m:�.+.-. ..,,Y,,..°:w, ......�,m.,..,.,,._,...........�..., �,....�...,...... ....,........,,,....� .w. ,.ao=,. .o Certification w,._.,,.._.aw.uus, ,.......,....w�..b._� ,rwi'wwrro.um.._....�n......................... �i..........�, ..,....�...��o.,.,..i...i FABRIC SILTAnON FENCE — ..,�....,,„-.v.o..-.. ,...-....-...,..W.-.. ... ,..........,..,. ,a Summary �..w.�._.,.��,.._.,....,_.,. _..,,._,_.,...,�_...._._.. ,,.a., _.._.,..._,-.,...._..�._�.. _.. _ ..,,,�...,,��...,...., .._.......... Revision story ,_.._........_� ..�.,,.,....w..,._,........,.w_....... .,stir.em...,n...°o,d.. .�m..>m... p���0''� ... .......,..........—,.....�...,�,.,.,,.,,.._.,......�.. m«w„o.,..,.m,..,ws..„ tie«....,e..w,,,..e.,a,,..*.,,.....,w .,.."w...... w...._m.. ,.,.....�.�,�.<....- rwrm `OS m ...�..d.,W_.�.._,_......._ .. ..�. ,..�. ......,.............°........�..�.. .w.,« .._..e.......,...rs�. p,E.p�4,tS` TEMPORARY ORAYEL CONsmucnap 5� ....... ......_.....�...—......®........,.,. �,.. .. ENTRANCE/DOT Sheet Title � EROSION& SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES& DETAILS Sheet No. Revision -- CATCH BASIN INLET FNOTECnoN 09AIL-TP ��. �2.0^ Project No. �A� Project j,%� AUTUMNWOODS ./;• ASSISTED WING m Fo,mnw aw.wm>t LOl'dtlOn a L11(\ NENZIE TERRAQ ST ANtHONY.MN 55t]B j Ww. G Client LANG NELSON ✓/ �. .a am*oxaw •.� • / CJ u`... �\ UTILITY[ONSTAUCTION NOTES rt.LwxxN4..�fYu I_ 4 Architect JAY P.NELSON 1 ARCHITECT �-" t mm..vmmxmx,..mwam..nm rt�rA avuamae urtw.w:Pmo.0 9aa � on wyrr�.urm `_ e n� •,,.1,• .. w..,�..xw..a. w�.vm,o wna....,........ Civil Engineer Rnfra U - i 7—TOL[.fL Vi] Certification as .+v�a.vu.�®wail mmn n�imv� ,�. :•`�•w�•� \1 -- - �♦ w.m m.mn mnunowu.w.vn imom wo. Summary • / � t T.-mx ��Pf�w.�1L _6 ..— 1 ams � dra rsrr�« ^u :�� Revision History ',� -- ��»�,�„�„��_�M�,r,,:,.,,.,.,–- --,,:-o–�:.,--�'”– .----• �.;,,.. C�e,�. —lmim xErxorts h C) ...Rm m Sheet Title SANITARY SEWER AND 's WATER SERVICE a PLAN "i I.NEN2IE TERRACE RESTORATION VANNG SERIONS ag� Sheet No. Revision C4.01 Project No. ® Protect AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING / Nom •.�„, Location KENW TERM ST A ONY,MN 55 0 Client Crom, ` 1— EON N —unuTvcorurnurnoNnoTEs LANG N .Tr. "� � ^'IIIIII�,II• ,% �I�� ��� .m.,, n,n.r.�.�a= / EXISTING BUILDING mT=—: ~m FFE=917 8, Architect I� BSMT=908 17 JAY P.NELSON ARCHITECT =1` � �. _ _ .,,.,ne,..�r,.L.umrwaLrumrNnNm®wra m.or0.+oa q oYUT.avw oon]w \ • ..�Nua.o]nm � �� /.. Roe � rmm wmxooNm.ww]nmvu �•, _' "` a `� .onmreanaw.Nos uomwuwwuo.m®emano.nn• Civil Engineer infra ��� �-,- � ✓� /+ jlF. mw ra nau,•mmrru wu®m.n wv,wn N.vwm�.r.wn YIDm..wIO+K _ /y,/r Rwoun err�xt �t i I u n.�.o..e.n.,ouo.n..o.m rooa.ar�� /• ,- � certification EAISTING EUI FFE=915 SummarywM ''k,' ,F` .'r'�"YZt1;..�.,r.F-a� {s�`r;Ll;^` -s�''`�+•.. ----- ESMT=906 ®.,.. > Revision History _.— iOF�A—nJ�^-- I I I :c•F•a.,.l I c � ), om er .e.owir..m, I I — Sheet Title —UTILFY KEY NOTES STORM SEWER o PLAN (INCOMPLETE) OOV�w..� Sheet No. Revision om�,n..Nm.Nnm mn.gn ..m,r._.�d. ...�wa.r�N me. ,�.N_� C5.01 o _ s O — Protect No. i ] Project AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED WING i I�F� _®oma_n.. .f• Location KEPOE TERRACE Si ANTHONY,MN SSUB 49 Client .�.�m,�":K� •�'�'' � — 9.5� � ��e�� ,�'•ns.7�..®mom'"a: .'$�. BAN-= ..,... �. LANG NELSON 1 —aCanac--A 4' I` ,....._....,_.m..,..�.. �� Architect -• JAY P.NELSON ARCHITECT amu wun m+u �munw.am.a. �°'°R" infra infra CONCRETE YASOKRYB1DO rlfr� infra n�uRn �a flfra .� w/m ON®AND GUTTER ��;. C0110h1E 9UElINJf OETAL �_ IR'fMIV11G ALL IR GAM a[fly Shu m,m.l IN ,R vY.a rs tns..t wen CATCH _ A Civil Engineer nfra Certification .� .�,....� - �.�,.+.,. � ........ _...•..Wit' �I � � r......,.� pi fr -- nSReummarL 7D �EIE , 1 6A9N f Y GA CS METAL fra ZI'I>e CATCH BASH ; a �Wfr@ NSTM SEIEN MANHOLE frg Revision History m.w sA.aau A...n, NEE IDL ... ��m:� • ,a,o T � - -� s��' ' ... ..., Aoe�..,� ®� Dae�Dn •�_ Sheet Title .....e m.. ...i.... m�.. � .®.a®,. m - � �• _® CIVIL DETAILS Sheet No. Revision C6.01 infra infra infra infra Rnfra ., STANDARD SAgTART ...,, WATERMAN k SAINTARY .. IYAE f9R NTORNR AND GTE VALVE AND 3 ,ma zr[ SEWER MANHOLE �p BEDONG DETA& m TTWGL NATERMAN a.000NG npaut GTE VALVE B15fALLAT1G1 a srL 8001 Y6fn1A71W Project NO. LANDSCAPE NOTES&DETAILS Autumn ��—M Nome _ °e"oo°a°°°' _ Woods 11 / _...,� �..e,.s�..m o_ .,....ar�.�.a.as r+.a. a_a....,.,...,...a�.®..�..._..«..'..+..... Sanl°r UAng '.T��O�.. ,_�.....� _ .,a. _....�...a 5. •..�..m..a.,.r«..�..a._ww..r�...�«.._r..ar.a.r...+ /-,-',MINERAL MULCH MAINTENANCE STRIP m..,. .S RUB PLANTING-SECTION '."..'."'e' """m"_,^""°""'m".:"�•"�"` ""'..o..«,...�...�... �. ....e _.v.r....«.._...........e....r...«..r«�.,,.....a......w« PERENNI L PLANTING DETAIL Rssruxna — "'a`««•�,e ,,,«�,,,da,�,«� �^�^°"�«...+�.ti«�...� /YICONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING-SECTION Calyx Design Group,llc DE IDUOUS TREEPLANTING-S ON a,��.�-b j"• w..+ rr_rsra.r.«.rw..i- rm w.s ­=D- q, e.lm,°....v / / -\/ �'� -•���� I �s�'rs®rr®w.•n�.e.��r,w�ra.n_ w.s..+ w«ram as,re«rarer / � � / ,t .r' A ® r �� '��3 .fi � `i;\ .a...��,.aaa. �...�+a+r�..•�".�«.��.�._'m'..��m�a.. mr�mm�mn�mai�,xE .�, 7f,a�• ,;-t.�•.S,• \' i� �I��.,..,. '--C'—' ._,....®...•._�......o......-. ��re.._..e._..� .wnnrta w.N.maa...�° -/ '�'''l''�•;.''� ."a',m®.s".er`..��_�...e.�...._..�....a. cwsmucriox�Omaasa / -----,,-•• _ •. � ." _:� 44�,��''���'' �.� a_. •'. P.RONSEWBU ING_-q.:u r�rp�• =.e-'r / i p :' Y 'v. ^.` r-�• =. a,=_xa��� `' -'�_„ Preliminary /� �// _ ;�4 mow' . �• �, "^�r�s: - �r/ / �'` � r •.,•.._�'. �`�m�'�"'-P<`'%� Landscape Plan 11-110 6 SEPI 2011 BDH rR BDH j io�av4', �� ,� c-.I �•. \ s,m xwc,.ma N°arH Ll MEMORY GARDEN AREA SITE PLAN AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING = Kenae Tenwe St.Mrtwny,MN PRELD41NARY ONLY 8-12 2011 fae ifs NOR Ilm I gill P.. RI North Elevation t>a�te► Building Elevations JAY P.NELSON T • c o It l l l-► 11 612-812-4628 East Elevation MIN'AYL\TA9UVLEVARn. x,o sr.l.ouls......na e3426 AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING -� - -- '- - Kenzie Terrace . - St.Anthony.MN PRELEMU NARY - ONLY 8-12-2011 Orr- TRITAN !L South Elevation (..a.) Building - Elevations .. .. .. JAY P. NELSON 111 H 11 or ,■ �_ ,= on - no ,■- „ „ IN A R 11 I T E C T eeW TmmT me me- me op 11 L1 West Elevation (mite) 612—812—4628 7-WAYZATA aUEVARD. IME'_5u ST.LDUIS P.iRA,heJ.5 3 J�6 AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING Kenzie Terrace St.Anthony,MN PRELIIv NARY ONLY 8-12-2011 .uaa r � t•. t �: ir _ - r Building Image JAY P. NELSON n e c n I T r c T Image Looking Southwest 612-812-4628 T6U I NA1'L\Tn a0U1.Et'.aen. SMITE:3 D IaY9�axn.•I..�a�.4ii..i... AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING Kenzie Tevate St Anthony,MN PRELIMINARY ONLY 5-12-2011 + t. yx-9 i� Building Image JAY P. NELSON _ w♦ x I S,Y J—� Image looking northeast 612—812—4628 1W I WN-TA BOULEV ARD. SMTF l 5o T LATS VAitI:MN 5526 t AUTUMN WOODS ASSISTED LIVING Kenme Terrace St.Anthony,MN PRELIIVE NARY ONLY 8-12-2011 • arr ar•. ♦ '- Building Image JAY P.NELSON j .S R C N I TEC T ,.f ...r..o .r,...ern Image looking northwest 612—812—4628 T-MAYZaTARDULEVA . SLATE 25a 5T I.OL�S EAki:.AW SSJ?6