HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC WORKSESSION 050619976:00 PM - COUNCIL MEETS IN CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
TO BEGIN WALK THROUGH PARK AREA.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
May 6, 1997
7:00 PM
City Hall /Community Center Council Chambers
PAGE (S)
I. CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. DISCUSS INSURANCE RENEWAL WITH MARK FLATEN
(May 27th Council meeting) ............................. 1 - 5
IV. REVIEW PARK PLAN FOR CENTRAL PARK WITH BOB
KOST OFBRW,INC . .................................. 6 -7
V. DISCUSS FUND BALANCE ALLOCATION, FALCON
HEIGHTS AND LAUDERDALE REVENUE, AND 1996
AUDIT CONCERNS WITH ROGER LARSON AND STU
BONNIWELL (May 27th Council meeting) ................... 8- 14
VI. REVIEW PARKVIEW DEMOLITION BIDS (May 13th
Council meeting) .......................... • • • . • • • • . 15 - 21
VII. SAV 2 AND APACHE UPDATE (June 9th Council meeting) • ..... 22- 26
VIII. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Future Work Sessions ........................... 27- 29
B. Costs for Sweatshirts and Caps ....................... 30
C. Discuss League of Minnesota Cities memo on help
for flood affected cities .......................... 31 -32
D. Schnitzer Update .. ............................... 33
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
III. DISCUSS INSURANCE RENEWAL WITH MARK FLATEN.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 30, 1997
TO: Mike Morrison, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE RENEWAL
Mr. Mark Flaten of American Risk Services will be present at the May 6, 1997, Council Work
Session to discuss and finalize insurance coverage for June 1, 1997 - May 31, 1998.
The attached information includes price quotations for property, auto, general liability, workers'
compensation and liquor liability. The cost for maintaining our present coverage of $10,000
deductible and $50,000 aggregate totals $167,07 5.
This amount represents a decrease in premiums of ($18,226) which is primarily due to decreases
in general liability and workers' comp premiums and the removal of Apache Wells from the
policy.
The lowest premium for On -Sale and Off -Sale liability coverage is being offered by Lexington
Insurance Company who insured last years liquor liability coverage. This company has A + +15
financial rating which is the highest rating any insurance company can receive.
Workers' compensation costs continue to be a concern for all Minnesota businesses. To help
rehabilitate employees in a timely manner, St. Anthony adopted a Managed Care Plan where
employees who are injured on the job are assigned to a specific clinic for rehabilitation of their
injury.
This results in a 10% reduction in workers' comp premiums and assists the employee with
developing a medical plan and treatment schedule.
As in previous years, no other insurance companies choose to compete with the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Last years coverage is primarily duplicated and a cost
breakdown is attached for Councils' review.
z
Insurance Renewal:
Increase
1996/97
1997/98
rease)
Property
$
5,999
$
4,846
($
19153)
Inland Marine
$
19217
$
19323
$
106
Boiler /Machinery
$
410
$
39203
$
2,793
Fidelity
$
710
$
710
$
- 0 -
Automobile
$
12,516
$
149020
$
11504
General /Liability
$
46,759
$
439762
($
2,997)
Open Meeting Law
$
974
$
912
($
62)
Petro -Fund
$
19323
$
19440
$
117
Workers' Comp
$
53,104
$
479082
($
69022)
Liquor Liability
$
57,516
$
45,004
($129512)
Volunteers
$
773
$
773
$
- 0 -
Agent Fees
$
4,000
$
49000
$
- 0 -
Total
$1859301
$1679075
($189226)
WA
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the following insurance coverage totaling $167,075 for the
upcoming year (Includes $10,000 Deductible Per Occurrence /$50,000 Aggregate):
1) Council approve the League of Minnesota Cities insurance proposal
for the following:
A.
Property
$ 4,846
B.
Inland Marine
$ 1,323
C.
Boiler /Machinery
$ 3,203
D.
Blanket Bond /Fidelity
$ 710
E.
Automobile
$14,020
F.
General Liability
$43,762
G.
Open Meeting Law
$ 912
H.
PetroFund /Underground Gas Tanks
$ 1,440
2) Council approve workers' compensation coverage totaling $47,082 which
includes an Employee Managed Care Plan.
3) Council approve Lexington Insurance Company as the City's On- Sale /Off-
Sale liquor liability carrier at a cost of $45,004
4) Council approve Accident Plan Coverage for Volunteers at a cost of $ 773
5) Council approve agent fees totaling $4,000.
§
»
0
H
)
w
\
\
}
�
�
7
\
_
}
{
�
k
!
|
!
§
`
®
-
} {\
}d
«
\
!
\
f
\!
(\(
f
7 •
\f
CL IL
»
),
{
CIL
[\i
(
\�\
E
J
-` ��
%
`
-
@
It
\\
k\
}�
\
\ \(
2
(
# }�
;
H
)
w
\
\
}
�
�
7
\
}
�
k
!
} {\
}d
7)
§§
7 •
\f
»
),
{
f #!
f!
E
J
-` ��
%
`
-
@
# }�
;
k
/!
t2
H
)
w
\
\
}
�
�
�v
Girl �lfe`
N _
O O OI O
� 00 DD b R
V 7 vO
n
o
v
7 v
`u
� o
N O N OOI
O
a
N
N
a
h V 00
M
C
U
.�.
n n
^'
M M
M
7,
� N r4
��.
V Oi vi
O�
O
O 1� W N
O
N N
N
C
O
�
»
O+
O
H
7
O
a
ONO W
N
_ _
O
A
yOHO
h V1 h
O
^
3
>
M M
M
OHO
h h M
00
N
h
V h
b
N N
N
�q
mm
M
r n I
v
..-i
h h
h
N _
O O OI O
� 00 DD b R
V 7 vO
n
o
v
7 v
`u
� o
a
5
U
.C.
N
V
f/J
N_
r
Y
01
.D
d
F
d
O.
IV. REVIEW PARK PLAN FOR CENTRAL PARK
May 1, 1997
B R w INC. Mr. Michael J. Momson
City Manager
Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Re: Central Park Design Alternatives
Dear Mr. Morrison:
Planning
The attached plans represent the culmination of our efforts with community
Transportation
education, sports boosters, high school and city staff in the redesign of Central
Engineering
Park. As a result of these efforts we have prepared three alternatives for review
Urban Design
and discussion with the City Council.
Thresher Square
The primary focus of the design alternatives is twofold: replacement of the tennis
700 Third street So.
court and play ground facilities that were displaced by the construction of the new
Minneapolis,
MN 33413 33413
City Hall / Community Center; and a long term reconfiguration of active
612/370 -0700
recreation facilities within the park and high school.
Fax 612/370 -1378
Consistent in all three alternatives are: the replacement of the play area and six
Denver
tennis courts; construction of an additional 31 parking spaces adjacent to the new
Milwaukee
tennis courts; placement of a new play area adjacent to the community center;
Minneapolis
replacement of the ice hockey area with a general purpose ice skating rink; and a
Newark
new performance / bandstand facility. We have prepared preliminary cost
Orlando
estimates for the three alternatives not including the bandstand. The bandstand
Phoenix
facility would require further discussion regarding program requirements before a
Portland
San Diego
realistic cost could be ascertained. We are also recommending that a concrete
Seattle
sidewalk be constructed around the perimeter of the park to facilitate better
pedestrian access.
Alternative `A' depicts the facilities described above along with a short term
solution for the conflict between the ball field and the community center.
Preliminary construction costs for improvements depicted in Alternative `A' are
estimated to run approximately $200,000 not including building demolition or
construction of the bandstand.
Mr. Michael J. Morrison
May 1, 1997
Page 2
Alternative `B' shows a long term reconfiguration of the three ball fields to better
meet the needs of multiple user groups and accommodate soccer fields in a
portion of the outfield areas. The plan also suggests a reconfiguration of the
northern parking lot, play area, sand volley ball court and a relocation of the
sledding hill. These changes are necessitated by the redesign of the ball fields.
Approximately 65 parking spaces would be displaced as part of this redesign.
Preliminary construction costs for Alternative `B' are estimated to run
approximately $450,000 not including building demolition or construction of the
bandstand.
Alternative `C' illustrates a more ambitious long term plan for the entire park
including two of the high school athletic fields. The plan organizes the ball fields
in a radial pattern around a new concessions /restroom building. The sledding hill
remains in its present location and the northern parking lot, play area and volley
ball are reconfigured as part of this design. Preliminary construction costs for
Alternative `C' are estimated to run approximately $550,000 not including
building demolition or construction of the bandstand.
I look forward to discussing these alternatives with you and the City Council next
week. If you have any questions please call me at 373 -6421.
Respectfully,
BRW, INC.
'c:: Y
Bob Kost ASL
Project Manager
BK/dc
Enclosures
cc: Suzanne Rhees
35185- 001 -9901
RKIWOMS.ITR
�f
I �
l a
L �\
I \
� 1
l
I ' J
r i
l
K
i I
/ i 4
Yy
i
1
I
i
I
i
lit
- --I
1
D -
4
2
fn
�l
i cL
N
F
yO
N
m
Q
W
Q
Z
w
W
J
t
�2Y
V
Y
CG
a o
HQ
lC },
I
I 1
L \ \1 �
f `
l
I
/ xis
°e
J�
�3
3
Z
T/
1
/ \\
i
i
i
X,
-1
1
3
I
I
I
1
IIII��
� S
Ems
i
I�
s
� f
<
0
x
In
W
Q
Z
cc
W
J
Q
U
f� >
Q }
a Z
J O
z
Z
W<
U N
lC +1
I 1
I x
I �
I
r /
J
� II
I I I
i
I
F777
r
.l
i
l
1 1
I
I
I-
i
I
1 /
r �
sILVLIc l.tLkR--
Tai � i
l
_ r
r,
3�
I
I I I I
� / 1
I
i
minUMME
on
4
_I
L
14
i
�Jk4
0
0
a
m
T
`W
Z
Q
z
W
r�
z
LLi
J
Y >
a Z
J =
H
z:
U L
V. DISCUSS FUND BALANCE ALLOCATION,
FALCON HEIGHTS AND LAUDERDALE REVENUE,
AND 1996 AUDIT CONCERNS.
Summary of Lauderdale Budget
For Fiscal Year 1996
1996
Actual
Revenues: — Lauderdale Contract Revenues Revenues
General Fund $147,172.00 $147,172.00
Capital Equipment $20,450. 00 $20,450.00
$167.622.00 $167.622.00
TOTAL DESIGNATED FUNDING FOR 1996 i 620.03
Designated
1996
Funding
1996
Actual
For Administative
Personal Services
Lauderdale
F)wendidures
Costs
101-41100-110
Salaries
$85,750.00
$64,096.50
$1,653.50
101 —41100 -11 1
Overtime Salaries
$1,250.00
$1,065.24
$184.76
101-41100-113
Salaries — Secretary
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$0.00
101-41100-114
Employers Contribution /Pension
$12,850.00
$11,104.91
$1,745.09
101-41100-115
Employers Contribution/ Insurance
$6,450.00
$6,425.58
$24.42
101 -41100 -117
Overtime Court
$750. 00
$162.14
$587. 88
Total Personal Services
$108.050.00
$103,854.37
$4,195.63
supplies
1 01 -41100 -226
General Supplies
$5.400.00
53,754.29
$1.645.71
Total Supplies
$5,400.00
$3,754.29
$1,645.71
Other Services & Charges
101-41100-321
Other Services
$1,950.00
$1,641.44
$308.56
101-41100-331
Communications
$8,650.00
$8,402.85
$2,247.15
101 - 41100 -333
Care & SupportlBooking Fees
$0.00
$0.00
$0•00
101-41100-334
Printing & Publishing
$1,150.00
$827.33
$322.67
101-41100-339
Maintenance & Repair
$175.00
$169.08
$5.92
101-41100-341
Travel /School/Conference
$1,000.00
$661.58
$338.42
101 -41100 -342
Subscriptions/Membership
$225.00
$91.04
$133.97
Total Other Services & Charges
$13,150.00
$9,793.31
$3,356.69
TOTAL 1995 POUCE BUDGET
8726.600.00
$177.401.97
$9,198.03
Other Lauderdale Budget Une Hems Transfers
101-40510-335
Finance /Accounting
$7•900•00
$7,900.00
$0'00
101 - 41900 -226
Animal Control
$325.00
$0.00
$325.00
101- 42200 -222
Public Works /Fuels & Lubricants
$8,250.00
88,250.00
$0.00
101 - 42200 -339
Public Works/Mamentance & Repair
$2,000•00
$2,000.00
$0'00
401- 47200 -453
Capital Equipment Purchases
$20,450.00
$20,450.00
$0.00
Contingency/Non— Designated
$2097.00
SO-00
$2,097.00
$167.622.00
8156.001.97
$2,422.00
TOTAL DESIGNATED FUNDING FOR 1996 i 620.03
0
Summary of Falcon Heights Budget
For Fiscal Year 1998
1996
Actual
Revenues: — Falcon Heights Contr act
Revenues
Revenues
General Fund
$301,810.00
$301,810.00
Capital Equipment
4$2 700.W
$24,700.00
$32Q510.00
$326.510.00
Designated
1996
Funding
1996
Actual
For Administative
Personal Services
Falcon Heights
E�pendidures
Costs
101-41100-110
Salaries
$179,550.00
$145,434.31
$34,115.69
101-41100-111
Overtime Salaries
$2,100,00
$1,581.42
$518.58
101 -41100 -113
Salaries — Secretary
$2,000.00
$2,000,00
$0'00
101-41100-114
Employers Contribution /Pension
$25,650.00
$23,509.82
$2,140.18
101 - 41100 -11 5
Employers Contribution /Insurance
$12,900.00
$12,904.06
($4.06)
101-41100-117
Overtime Court
1$_,250.
$269.90
Total Personal Services
$223,450.00
$185,699.51
$37,750.49
Supplies
101-41100-226
General Supplies
$10,$00.00
$7,153.1 4
$3.146.86
Total Supplies
$10,300.00
$7,153.14
$3,146.86
Other Services & Charges
101 — 41100-321
Other Services
$4,150.00
$3,478'88
$671'12
101-41100-331
Communications
$19,000.00
$13,349.93
$5,650.07
101-41100-333
Care & Support/Booking Fees
$0.00
$0•00
$0'00
101-41100-334
Printing & Publishing
$1,550.00
$1,115.64
$434,36
101-41100-339
Maintenance &Repair
$450.00
$435.89
$14'11
101-41100-341
Travel /School /Conference
$2,100.00
$1,385.43
$714.57
101-41100-342
Subscriptions/Membership
5$ 25.00
2$ 12.06
$312'94
Total Other Services & Charges
$27,775,00
$19,977,83
$7,797,17
TOTAL 1996 POLICE BUDGET
$261525.00
$212.830.47
$48.694.53
Other Lauderdale Budget Line Items Transfers
101 -40510 -335
Finance /Accounting
$15,800.00
$15,800.00
$0.00
101 -41900 -226
Animal Control
$1,550.00
$0,00
$1,550.00
101 - 42200 -222
Public Works /Fuels & Lubricants
$8,250.00
$8,250.00
$0.00
101-42200-339
Public Works/Mainentance & Repair
$2,100.00
$2,100.00
$0'00
401- 47200 -453
Capital Equipment Purchases
$34,700.00
$34,700.00
$0.00
Contingency/Non— Designated
2$ ,555.00
$0.00
$2585.00
$326,510.00
$273.680.47
$4,135.00
TOTAL DESIGNATED FUNDING FOR 1996
2$5 ,829.53
10
Lauderdale /Falcon Heights:
Non - Designated Fund Balance $ 64,449.56
Recommendations for Designations:
Unemployment Liability ($ 79000.00)
(Falcon Heights)
Fund '97 Squad Car of Police ($ 9,900.00)
Capital Equipment Funding ($47,549.56
Total Designated $ 64,449.56
1996 General Fund Reserves:
Non - Designated Funds $ 234,929.82
Recommendations for Designations:
Unemployment Liability /Contracts ($ 79000.00)
Fund '97 Squad Car ($ 99900.00)
Capital Equipment Transfer (Contracts) ($ 47,549.56)
Replenish MPRS Legal Costs
Replensish Schnitzer Legal Costs
Insurance Reserves
Underground Storage Tanks Funding
Pole Building for Salt /Sand Pile
Budget Levy Reductions
Total Designated
($ 519.02)
($ 159905.74)
($ 27,055.50)
($ 23,000.00)
($ 30,000.00)
($ 74,000.00)
$ 234,929.82
12
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 23, 1996
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCES
During the 1989 Special Session, the 1990 and 1991 regular sessions, many legislators focused
attention on cities' fund balances. Discussions centered on what some legislators call
"excessive" reserves. This trend continues in 1997 and in light of the consistent attention to
these dollars, it becomes essential for St. Anthony to designate or earmark these funds prior to
completing its annual State Auditors Report.
Like St. Anthony, many Cities have developed a policy to designate Unappropriated Fund
Balances. These reserves come from fiscal years where revenues exceeded expenditures and have
a significant impact on the operation of St. Anthony. To assist local governments, the League
of Minnesota Cities developed a task force to formulate recommendations how cities should
designate the use of these funds. Their suggestions are as follows:
1) Cities designated part or all of their undesignated reserve fund balances prior to
submitting its annual Financial Profile to the State Auditors Office.
2) Cities should plan carefully in the designation of these funds and indicate to their auditors
they would like these designations included in their annual Financial Statements.
3) Designations may be established to indicate tentative plans for financial resource
utilization in a future period. Such designations reflect managerial plans or intent,
however, they are not permanent and Council may choose to re- direct or redesignate
these funds at any time.
4) Cities analyze its cash flow needs for the purpose of designating an adequate amount of
cash in the General Fund for Working Capital. Since cities receive their revenues twice
a year, a significant amount of cash on hand is required to draw from when there is no
revenue coming into a City. It is recommended 25 % to 35 % of the general fund budget
be held in reserves. This prevents short term borrowing of which expenses for interest
can be significant and have a negative impact on the current years operating budget.
13
To comply with the League's recommendations, St. Anthony designates its reserves for inclusion
in the annual audit /financial report. Presentation of the auditors review of the 1996 accounting
records is scheduled for the May 6th Council Worksession.
Upon examination of the 1996 audited financial records, staff has documented the designation
of all Fund Balance Reserves and is providing Council with the following information for review
and approval:
RECOMMENDATION:
A) Council designate the following as Reserved /Restricted Use Funds:
1) #205 MSA Construction Fund
2) #225 Recycling & Beautification Fund
3) #230 Police Forfeiture /Dare Fund
4) #240 Crime Prevention Fund
5) #301 Housing & Redevelopment Fund
6) #503 Road Improvement Bond Fund
7) #504 Street Improvement Construction Fund
8) #601 Community Service Center Fund
9) #701 Water /Sewer Fund
10) #702 Stormwater Improvement Fund
11) #704 Water Contamination Fund
B) Council designate reserves totaling $ 7,000.00 from Falcon Heights contract to fund
unanticipated unemployment costs.
C) Council transfer contract reserves totaling $ 9,900.00 to fund #401 to fund '97 squad
car.
D) Council transfer contract reserves totaling $47,550.00 to fund #509 for future capital
equipment purchases.
E) Council designate reserves totaling $ 519.02 to replenish costs incurred for MPRS legal
expenses (Total Reserves = $ 15,000.00).
F) Council designate reserves totaling $15,905.74 to replenish costs incurred for Schnitzer
legal expenses (Total Reserve = $ 50,000.00)
G) Council designate reserves totaling $27,056.00 to fund Insurance Reserves Fund.
H) Council transfer reserves totaling $ 23,000.00 to fund #509 to increase funding for
Underground Storage /Gas Tank Removal (Total Reserve = $ 46,000.00).
1) Council transfer reserves totaling $ 30,000.00 to fund #509 to establish funding for Pole
Building for Salt /Sand Pile.
0
.n Council transfer reserves totaling $74,000.00 to fund #509 to increase funding for
Budget /Levy Reductions (Total Reserve = $ 198,000.00).
K) Council designate reserves totaling $100,000.00 in Fund #201 for funding of anticipated
1997 revenue shortage of Liquor Profit Transfer.
L) Council designate the following fund balances for inclusion in the 1996 Audit Report:
1) #101 General Fund
Working Capital
Unemployment Reserves
Insurance Reserves
2) #201 General Fund Reserve
Budget /Revenue Shortages
General Reserves
3) #401 Capital Equipment Fund
4) #509 Revolving Improvement Fund
$ 583,748
$ 28,000
$ 168,387
$ 100,000
$ 47,463
$ 89,739
Capital Equipment
$
127,422
Improvement Projects
$
310,151
Budget /Levy Reserves
$
198,000
Underground Storage Tanks
$
46,000
Pole Building Salt /Sand
$
30,000
5) #901 Retirement Fund
Severance Payments $ 251,242
Is
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID
The City of St. Anthony requests sealed bids on a General Contract, including mechanical,
electrical and fire protection work, for a new liquor store for the City of St. Anthony, of
approximately 8,500 square feet. The Project consists of a 4,800 square foot addition to an
existing one -story masonry, composite wall building and remodeling of approximately 3,700
square feet of an existing tenant's building. Maintaining access during business hours to
existing tenant is an essential component of this Project.
Bids shall be on a stipulated lump sum basis; segregated bids will not be accepted.
The City of St. Anthony will receive Bids until 2:00 PM CDT on Tuesday, June 3, 1997,
at the office of the City Clerk, City of St. Anthony, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St.
Anthony, Minnesota 55418 -1699. Bids received after this time will not be accepted.
Bids will be opened publicly.
Bids shall be addressed to the attention of: Connie Kroeplin
City Clerk
Drawings and Project Manual will be available on or about May 15, 1997 and may be
examined at the following locations:
Minneapolis and St. Paul Builders Exchanges
F.W. Dodge Plan Room, Minneapolis
Construction Bulletin Plan Room, Brooklyn Park
National Association of Minority Contractors, Minneapolis
Copies of the Bidding Documents may be obtained from the Architects office in accordance
with the Instructions to Bidders upon deposit of $100.00 for each set of documents. If
Bidding Documents are to be mailed, a separate, non - refundable check in the amount of
$15.00, issued to KKE Architects, must accompany your request. Deposits will be returned
to those bidders who return complete documents in usable condition (as determined by the
Architect) within 10 days of the opening of Bids.
Bid security in the form of a bid bond in the amount of 5 percent of the Bid must accompany
each Bid in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders.
The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all Bids without explanation and to waive
irregularities.
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
May 7, 1997
1(®
BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE DEMOLITION OF PARKVIEW
Bids were opened on April 29, 1997 at 2:00 PM at the City Hall /Community Center.
Bidder
Amount
Addenda
Bid Bond
Time
Bolander
$267,375
1
Yes
50
BelAir
$254,288
1
Yes
60
Thomas
$247,450
Yes
100
Veit
$255,631
1
Yes
80
Ceres
$174,875
1
Yes
Fratalone
$239,100
1
Yes
90
DKH
$166,850
1
Yes
60
Kevitt
$192,450
1
Yes
90
1-7
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 23, 1997
TO: Mike Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Roger Larson, Finance Director
ITEM: NEW CITY HALL /COMMUNITY CENTER REPORT
The following is a recap of the revenues and expenditures to date:
Revenues:
Sale of Bonds
$ 2,640,325.00
Donation/Reimbursements
$ 8,020.14
City Funds:
General Reserves
$ 1,179,047.00
Cable Reserves
$ 92,423.00
Interest Earnings
$ 90,000.00
Capital Equipment Transfer
$ 44,000.00
Chandler TIF Transfer
$ 146,639.00
Total $ 4,200,454.14
Less Expenditures: (Y -T -D)
1995 Expenditures $ 260,526.36
1996 Expenditures 12/31/96 $ 3,085,419.44
1997 Expenditures 4/15/97 $ 230.730.65
Total $ 3,576,676.45
BALANCE UNSPENT $ 623,777.69
I9
Remaining Expenditures:
Sports Boosters Payment $ 15,000.00
Approved Expenditures 4/22/97 ($ 32,308.00)
Remaining Contingency * $ 95,394.10 **
* Note - I haven't included the $45,000 contribution owed from the Sports Boosters or any of
the available revenue from the School District's payment ($100,000 less $28,500 O /M).
Adding those numbers to the remaining balance would bring the contingency total
to $ 211.894.10.
** Contingency was reduced by $32,308 from last report due to 4/22/97 approved expenditure
(See Attached).
4/15/97
Graus Construction
$
213,687.00
Inspections
$
20,000.00
Demolition and asbestos
$
210,000.00
Phone
$
7,147.21
Audio /Video
$
241.38
Tennis Courts
$
40,000.00
Playground Area
$
20,000.00
$
511,075.59
Sports Boosters Payment $ 15,000.00
Approved Expenditures 4/22/97 ($ 32,308.00)
Remaining Contingency * $ 95,394.10 **
* Note - I haven't included the $45,000 contribution owed from the Sports Boosters or any of
the available revenue from the School District's payment ($100,000 less $28,500 O /M).
Adding those numbers to the remaining balance would bring the contingency total
to $ 211.894.10.
** Contingency was reduced by $32,308 from last report due to 4/22/97 approved expenditure
(See Attached).
I
Current Contingency:
Amount remaining from Cable Reserves $ 41,787
Amount remaining from General Reserves 85,915
Total Contingency $ 127,702
Approved 4/22/97
Additional Expenditures
1)
Police Furniture
$ 6,558
2)
Audio -Video (Police)
$ 19,838
3)
Keying
$ 722
4)
Finance Furniture
$ 1,200
5)
Sidewalk
$ 1,500
6)
Electric Boosters
$ 565
7)
Flag
1,925
Total Expenses
$ 32,308
Remaining Contingency:
Amount remaining from Cable Reserves $ 41,787
Amount remaining from General Reserves 53,607
Proposed Contingency $ 95,394
ao
4/15/97
Graus Construction
$3,054,427.05
Construction
Willaims /O'Brian Associates
$
214,896.82
Engineering
General Office Products
$
113,807.61
Office Furniture
American Engineering & Testing
$
14,897.20
Soil Testing
Dorsey & Whitney
$
6,212.24
Legal /Bond Council
Southam Buisness
$
222.50
Advertisement for Bids
Egan, Field & Nowak
$
4,212.76
Survey New City Hall
American Bank
$
75.00
Register Bonds /Agent Fees
Moody's
$
4,500.00
Credit Rating - Al
Springsted
$
17,155.03
Financial Advisory/Bonds
Rice Creek Watershed
$
2,500.00
Permit Fees
Northern Waterworks
$
1,248.79
Sewer hook -up /New City Hall
Davies Water Equipment
$
200.34
Sewer hook -up /New City Hall
ESI Communications
$
52,592.17
Telephones
Capital Communications
$
4,322.64
Radio Tower /Police
Legend Technical
$
1,837.58
Asbestos /Old City Hall
Institute for Environment
$
968.00
Asbestos /Old City Hall
711
Bill Bruce A/V
$
3,877.75
A/V Consultant
Blumberg Communications
$
46,758.62
Audio Visual Equipment
Duane Grace
$
3,469.00
Building Inspector
Building Permit Surcharge
$
1,200.00
Building Permit /Surcharge
Ramsey County
$
19.50
File Easement with County
R. David Photography
$
543.15
Pictures /Council & Dept Heads
Sterling Electric
$
6,164.19
Electrical /Police Offices
Central Lock & Safe
$
1,274.66
Keys for New City Hall
Dama Metal
$
100.79
Key Box /New City Hall
Graybar Electric
$
43.29
Keys for Lock Box
Michael's #3701
$
649.71
Picture Fraiming
Clarklift of Minnesota
$
7,287.95
Shelving Vault /Police
U.S. West
$
5,785.30
Phone Connection & Digging
Markhurd
$
2,449.50
Aerial Pictures of St. Anthony
Area Mechanical
$
700.00
Alarm/Horn for Boiler
American Office Products
$
1,171.50
Coat Rack's (2)
Dalco
$ 1,105.81
Receptacle's /Can Crushers
Expenditures
$ 3,576,676.45
VI. SAV 2 AND APACHE UPDATE.
zz
��
DATE:
May 1, 1997
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM:
Michael J. Mornson, City Manager
ITEM:
SAV 2 ISSUES
1. Facade - alternate bid for Tires Plus only.
2. Parking lot lighting - alternate bid only.
3. Roof - alternate bid over Tires Plus.
4. Pave entire parking lot.
5. Larry - asbestos removal.
6. Sign package, interior part of building /shelving, cash counters, plus
cooler relocation.
7. Schedule of events:
a. May 16 (estimate)
sign purchase agreement
b. June 3
bid opening
C. June 3
work session
d. Monday, June 9
award bid
e. Monday, June 9
authorize Springsted to do liquor
revenue bond sale
f. June 10
close on property
g. June 20 to October 20
16 weeks of construction
h. July 8
award bond sale
8. Discuss Kim Johnson's liquor issues.
23
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES
Minn. Stat. § 340A.414, subds. Under the consumption and display law, establishments must
5, 6. receive a permit from the liquor control division of the state
Department of Public Safety. The liquor control director must
obtain approval from the city council before issuing this
permit. Permits are for one year, expiring annually on June 30.
The fee for such permits is currently $150, but the statutes
allow cities to impose an additional fee of not more than $300
per year. A city may not simultaneously require a license for
these clubs, and may not grant bottle club licenses to
businesses or clubs that do not have the state permit. The city,
with the approval of the commissioner, may grant up to 10
one -day permits to nonprofit organizations in conjunction with
a social activity sponsored by the city.
A.O.Op. 218 -h -2 (Aug. 1, Cities may, in some instances, impose more restrictive
1961). regulations than those in state law. For example, a city may
enforce anti - spiking ordinances or local regulations limiting
the time when such establishments may operate. Cities may
also pass ordinances that forbid altogether the operation of
such clubs or establishments within their boundaries.
Municipal liquor
Minn. Stat. § 340A.601 -.604. Any Minnesota city with a population of 10,000 or less, except
those that have been incorporated for less than two years, may
own and operate a retail dispensary with off -sale liquor,
on -sale liquor or both. A recently incorporated city may be
able to establish a municipal liquor store in less than two years
after incorporating if it was an urban town or major part of an
urban town. Subsequent changes in population do not affect
the ability of a city to operate a liquor store.
Minn. Stat. § 340A.601, subd. Once a city establishes a municipal store, all private
5. intoxicating liquor licensing in the city must cease, unless the
city has opted for split liquor, or has annexed or consolidated
with an area and a private liquor license holder was located in
the area. After the voters approve a split liquor system, cities
may issue on -sale licenses to hotels, clubs and restaurants.
344
CHAPTER 14
Operation of a municipal liquor store
Jewel Belting Co. v. Village of
City councils are responsible for the operation of the municipal
Bertha, 91 3 Minn. 9, . 218R N.W.
424 (1903): A.G. Op. 218R
liquor store. They may delegate ministerial duties relating to
e
(July 13,1962).
the daily operations of the store to a liquor store manager or
commission. The council may not delegate any policy - making
A.G. Op. (July 27, 1981).
powers, nor may it give employees authority to approve
disbursement of funds in the liquor account. A city may not
contract with a private corporation for the management and
operation of a municipal liquor store.
A.G. op. 218 -h -2 (Apr. 5,
961 ).
A liquor store manager who acts under the direction of the
council is usually in charge of the store. There is some
question as to whether a manager may participate in the profits
of the store in lieu of, or in addition to, a salary. In an opinion
arguing that a manager who was allowed to share in the profits
would become a private licensee, the attorney general
determined that such an arrangement was prohibited. At the
time of that opinion, however, split liquor was not authorized,
thus, it is not clear how a ruling would be made under current
law.
Minn. Stat. § 340A.601, subd.
1.
Besides intoxicating liquors, municipal liquor stores may sell
and serve cigars, cigarettes, all forms of tobacco, soft drinks,
beer, ice and food for consumption on the premises. The
ordinance establishing a liquor store should state which of
these items the store may sell. A municipal liquor store may
offer recorded or live entertainment and coin- operated
amusement devices. If it offers music, it must pay fees to the
American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers
(ASCAP) and Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI), who collect
copyright royalties. (See Chapter 13 for a discussion on the
authority to sell pull -tabs at a municipal liquor store.)
The city must promptly report any change in location of the
Schapiro, Dreamland Ballroom v.
Schapiro, 3 36 F.2d 354 (7th Cir.
municipal liquor dispensary to the liquor control division, or
1929).
any change in the method of sale, as from on- or off -sale to
off -sale only.
Minn. Stat. § 412.271, subd. 1.
Although the law doesn't require it, the state auditor has
recommended that cities maintain a separate liquor store fund
for each store. Otherwise, all liquor store receipts and
disbursements must go through the general fund. All liquor
store receipts must go to the treasurer, and the city must make
all disbursements in the same manner as for all other city
disbursements.
347
24-
25-
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES
Abolishing a municipal liquor store
A city may discontinue the operation of a municipal liquor
store in several ways:
Minn. Stat. § 340A.412, subd. The liquor store must cease to operate if the city voters vote to
4(6). have the city become dry. In this case, it is uncertain whether
the municipal store must cease operations immediately after
the election, or whether it may continue to operate for the
balance of the year.
Minn. Stat. 340A.602. If a city liquor store has a net loss prior to any inter-fund
transfers in any two of three consecutive years, the city council
must hold a public hearing on the question of whether the city
shall continue to operate the liquor store.
The hearing must take place not more than 45 days prior to the
end of the fiscal year following the three -year period. After the
hearing, the council may, on its own motion, or must, upon
petition of five percent or more of the registered voters of the
city, submit the question of whether the city should continue
liquor store operations by a date determined by the city council
to the voters at the general or special election.
Finally, the council can, at any time, abolish the municipal
liquor dispensary or make changes in the manner of sale, such
as changing from off -sale only to on- and off -sale. In the first
case, the council would repeal the municipal liquor ordinance
and, in the other case, it would amend the ordinance.
After a city abolishes a municipal liquor store, it must
negotiate the sale of the fixtures and buildings. The clerk must
submit a certified inventory of the stock on hand to the liquor
control division, giving the brand names, the size and number
of containers, and the details of disposition. The clerk must
also submit the retailer's identification card to the division for
cancellation.
Split liquor
Minn. Stat. § 340A. Got, subds. The council of any city owning and operating a municipal
5-7. liquor store, on approval of a majority of those voting on the
question at a special election, may authorize on -sale liquor
licenses to clubs, hotels and restaurants. This authority
continues indefinitely.
350
k/,
340A.415 LIQUOR 612
al penalty or suspension by the other so long as the total penalty or suspension does not ex-
ceed the stated maximum.
History: 1985 c 148 s 70; 1985 c 305 art 6 s 15; 1985 c 309 s 11; ISp1985 c 16 art
2 s 3 subd 1; I Sp1986 c 3 art I s 42: 1987 c 152 art I s 1; 1987 c 310 s 12; 1988 c 534 s
2; 1991 c 149 s 19; 1993 c 350 s 11; 1994 c 611 s 23
340A.416 LOCAL OPTION ELECTION.
Subdivision 1. Petition. Upon receipt of a petition signed by 30 percent of the persons
voting at the last city election or 200 registered voters residing in the city, whichever is less, a
statutory city or home rule charter city of the fourth class shall place before the voters of the
city the question of whether the city will issue intoxicating liquor licenses.
Subd. 2. Ballot question. The question of the referendum under this section must be on
a separate . ballot and must allow the voters to vote either "for license" or "against license"
Subd. 3. Effect of election results. If a majority of persons voting on the referendum
question vote "against license," the city may not issue intoxicating liquor licenses until the
results of the referendum have been reversed at a subsequent election where the question has
been submitted as provided in this section.
Subd. 4. Certification to secretary of state. The clerk or recorder must certify results
of a referendum held under this section to the secretary of state within ten days of the election.
Subd. 5. Challenge of election. Where the results of a referendum under this section are
challenged by any voter, the county attorney of the county inhere the election was held must
appear in defense of the validity of the election.
History: 1985 c 305 art 6 s 16; 1987 c 152 art 1 s 1; 1994 c 611 s 14
340A.417 SHIPMENTS INTO MINNESOTA.
(a) Notwithstanding section 297C.09 or any provision of this chapter, a winery licensed
in a state which affords Minnesota wineries an equal reciprocal shipping privilege may ship,
for personal use and not for resale, not more than two cases of wine, containing a maximum
of nine liters per case, in any calendar year to any resident of Minnesota age 21 or over. Deliv-
ery of a shipment under this section may not be deemed a sale in this state.
(b) The shipping container of any wine sent into or out of Minnesota under this section
must be clearly labeled to indicate that the package cannot be delivered to a person under the
age of 21 years.
(c) No person may (1) advertise shipments authorized under this section, or (2) by ad-
vertisement or otherwise, solicit shipments authorized by this section. No shipper located
outside Minnesota may advertise such interstate reciprocal wine shipments in Minnesota.
(d) It is not the intent of this section to impair the distribution of wine through distribu-
tors or importing distributors, but only to permit shipments of wine for personal use.
History: 1993 c 350 s 12
340A.418 NINE TASTINGS.
Subdivision 1. Definition. For purposes of this section, a "wine tasting" is an event of
not more than four hours' duration at which persons pay a fee or donation to participate, and
are allowed to consume wine by the glass without paying a separate charge for each glass.
Subd. 2. Tastings authorized. (a) A charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organiza-
tion may conduct a wine tasting on premises the organization owns or leases or has use do-
nated to it, or on the licensed premises of a holder of an on --sale intoxicating liquor license
that is not a temporary license, if the organization holds a temporary on—sale intoxicating
liquor license under section 340A.404, subdivision 10, and complies with this section. An
organization holding a temporary license may be assisted in conducting the wine tasting by
another nonprofit organization.
(b) An organization that conducts a wine tasting under this section may use the net pro-
ceeds from the wine tasting only for:
(1) the organization's primary nonprofit purpose; or
VI. OTHER BUSINESS.
211
FUTURE WORK SESSION MEETINGS
Tentative Issues
June 3 Discussion of Fire Relief Association (DJ)
Discussion of Water Treatment Fund (RL)
Capital Equipment Plan
Discussion of RFP's for audit firm
SAV 2 update -bids (ML)
Apache update (MM)
Comprehensive Plan update (MM)
1998 road project (MM)
July 1st Possible cancellation due to the 4th of July holiday
or move one week, if needed
July Budget planning meeting and goal setting with Staff in
the Conference Room (catered meal)(see attached
proposed agenda)
September 2nd Finalize the 1998 levy
Liquor update
Apache update
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
BUDGET PLANNING MEETING
Tuesday, July 29, 1997
Dinner from 5:30 P.M. to 6:30 P.M. (Catered)
Meeting Begins at 6:30 P.M.
Conference Room
Page(s)
CALL TO ORDER.
II. ROLL CALL.
III. REVIEW BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS WITH STAFF
FOR 1998 BUDGET AND LEVY.
IV. DISCUSS GOALS, ISSUES, AND CONCERNS
WITH
DEPARTMENT HEADS.
A.
Police.
B.
Fire.
C.
Finance.
D.
Liquor.
E.
Public Works.
V. OTHER BUSINESS.
VI. ADJOURNMENT.
213
What are the City's top issues that should be addressed over the next 12 to 24 months?
2.
30
Cost of T -Shirts & Caps
35 Caps @ $5.00 per cap ............... .........................175.00
35 T -Shirts @ $6.00 per shirt .......... .........................210.00
(White)
35 T -Shirt @ $8.00 per shirt ........... .........................280.00
(Blue)
35 St. Anthony Pins @ $2.00 per pin . ..........................70.00
Total Caps & White T- Shirts .... ............................... $385.00
Total Caps & Blue T- Shirts .............. ........................$455.00
t
LAC
La 9 of V;,ncsota Cities
i rin;t
9 Qxcancn
To: Minnesota Mayors
From: The League of Minnesota Cities
Re: Help for flood affected cities
31
145 UnivursiF�one7t(6) vest, 811 00 i (00) 925-1122
Fax: (612) 281 -1299 • TDD (612) 281.1290
Cities helping cities -At' s a natural phenomenon when disaster strike es last i response
Cities needing
unprecedented flooding is overwhelming. We heard from many personnel and even money i
flood assistance information, and cities offering their equipment,
meet those needs.
With that in mind, we've created the Cities Helping Cities program. Through the program, we
plan to match cities that need help in restoring municipal operations and services with cities that
have equipment and personnel available.
We've spent the last few days calling cities directly affected by floods. They told us what help
they nee, and hasd not lbeen contacted, tcall Theinformation es a Perry at (612) 281_1200 or, assistance
800) 925- 1122.
Now we need to know what is available. The second page of this fax lists equipment and
personnel needed by flood affected cities. If your city is able to provide assistance, please
assistance a available. Fax your completed forms o the L ague at (612) 281 -1235. with the
Keep in mind that clean-up and recovery efforts will go on for many months in the most severely
flooded cities. Even if your city can't help now, help will be needed in the coming months
Many cities have asked us if they could donate money pof its states owplowing umo11 and flood-stricken cities.
has already donated $5,000. Roseville wants to pledge some
hopes other cities will consider similar action. To help cities and other organizations make
donations, the League has created the LMC Flood Recovery Fund. This fund is being handled
by the League of Minnesota lce to restore Research
pal operations, For oney more received
ation, contact
to cities needing
Finance Director Dave DuBord at (612) 281 -1200. Donations can be sent to:
The League of Minnesota Cities' Flood Recovery Fund
145 University Ave. W.
St. Paul, MN 55102.2044.
Thank you for your help. If you have any questions, contact Theresia Perry at (612) 281 -1200 or
(800)925 -1122.
AN EQUAL OMRTUAnTY/AFFMyATNE ACTION EMPLOYER
r.d _ SM1I0 NW A0 XIOU31 Wd80:Et L6, 0E 6dd
Cities Helping Cities 32
The following is a list of some of what will be needed to get affected communities back in the business
)f providing for the health, safety and welfare of citizens. If your city is able to provide any of the
following, please circle the appropriate item, list the number available and indicate when the equipment
or personnel would be available. Fax this form back to the League at (612) 281 -1235.
Personnel How many?
Equipment How many. When available?
When available?
Administrative personnel —
Front end loaders Building officials
Motor graders graders Civil engineers �----
sweepers
EMT's ---�
Dump trucks ----
Fire fighters - --�- -�
Generators
Office help -----
Pumps -------
Operations
Hoses ---�`
Police officers ---�-
Traffic control signs
Records management
Communications equipment equipment Vehicle mechanics � —.-- --
Other
Water/Wastewater
plant operators -----
Other
City
Contact person
Title
Phone Fax
If you have any questions, contact Tberesia Perry at (612) 281 -1200 or (800) 925 -2211 LC
2 •d 63I1IO NW d0 3n5U3-1 Wd80:2S L6. 06 add" �
33
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 6, 1997
TO: Michael J. Mornson, City Manager
FROM: Kim Moore - Sykes, Management Assistant (/
ITEM: Schnitzer Issues v
Attached is a copy of a letter recently sent to Peder Larson, MPCA Commissioner, which
is attempting to put the de minimus settlement process on hold until information
uncovered by Common Counsel can be assessed and acted on by the State. As you will
read, there are several issues that the Group is asking Mr. Larson to review, especially the
MPCA's responsible party identification process. It is hoped that the Commissioner will at
least be persuaded to lower the clean -up level, (thus mitigating the PRP's financial liability)
if he cannot be persuaded that the current group of PRP's were identified erroneously.
Another issue that the PRP Group is reviewing deals with a recent ruling where a judge
found in favor of the defendant in an action to determine financial responsibility for the
clean -up of a listed site. The defendant stated that they were not responsible for the
contamination of the site because analysis showed the chemical composition of the wood
preservative they used was different from the wood preservative found at the site.
Introduction of the "causation question" by Judge Robert Keeton's ruling is serving as an
opportunity for defense attorneys to utilize the "burden of proof' mechanisms at the
liability stage as well as the allocation stage of the cost recovery suits.
This is especially pertinent to our involvement with the Schnitzer site because the MPCA
has said that they are not interested in knowing what specifically caused the lead
contamination; they understand from soil samples they pulled from the site that there is
lead contamination that was "probably" from batteries, (PEER Engineering report). In a
conflicting report from COGNIS, a testing and remediation firm, indicated that the lead
contamination was mostly from lead paint used on automobiles, porcelain chips from
sinks, leaded glass and leaded automobile fluids. It is interesting that while the University
had hired COGNIS to analyze the soil at the Schnitzer site, their report is not referred to
in any of the MPCA's documentation.
The second document is an invoice for legal and technical costs. The attached letter
describes how this current assessment was determined. If a settlement occurs, whatever
amount is remaining from our assessment will be refunded to the City.
LAW OFFICES
HESSIAN, MCKASY & SODERBERG
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Minneapolis • Saint Paul • Washington,D.C.
4700 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -2228
(612) 330 -3000 Facsimile 371 -0653
April 15, 1997
VIA MESSENGER
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Joseph G. Maternowski
Lee A. Henderson
(612) 330 -3000
Re: De Minimis Settlement Process
Schnitzer Iron and Metal Company Superfund Site
Dear Commissioner Larson:
We serve as Common Counsel to the Schnitzer Iron and Metal MERLA Site Group (the
"Group "). We have previously provided comments to staff of the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency's (MPCA) Ground Water and Solid Waste Division relating to the Pre - Cleanup
Investigation and Focused Feasibility Study, Revised Response Action Plan and the Draft
Minnesota Decision Document relating to the Schnitzer Iron and Metal MERLA Site.
On Friday, March 21, 1997, members of the Group met with Dale Thompson and Dale
Trippler of your staff and Jocelyn Olson from the Attorney General's Office to discuss the status
of the Schnitzer matter and particularly the MPCA's plan to pursue a de minimis settlement in
the Schnitzer matter. We are writing on behalf of the members of the Schnitzer Group to
express the grave concerns we have with MPCA staff's plan to proceed with a de minimis
settlement. A list of the members participating in this response is attached as Exhibit A.
PAST CONCERNS
In the past the Group has expressed concerns to MPCA staff about the Schnitzer matter.
This has been a problem site for many years and has seen a variety of staff changes over the
years. The project has been plagued by procedural irregularities which have and will continue
to interfere with effective resolution of the Schnitzer site. These deficiencies, which are outlined
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 2
below, raise serious doubts about the fundamental fairness of the proposed de minimis settlement
to all parties but particularly to the members of the Group who have been misidentified by the
MPCA as potentially responsible parties (PRPs). Therefore, the MPCA should immediately
suspend the de minimis settlement process relating to the Schnitzer Site.
The MPCA is not required to proceed with a de minimis settlement. In fact, because the
MPCA has entered into a Response Order by Consent with the primary responsible party, the
University of Minnesota, and other remediating parties, there is no reason for the MPCA to
move forward with a de minimis settlement.
The University was aware that the site was listed on the State List of Permanent List of
Priorities when it purchased the property in 1987. Several years after the purchase the
University realized that the escrow set aside for the cleanup was inadequate. The University
made a bad deal. We understand that the de minimis parties will be asked to pay up to $1
million to compensate the University for its poor judgment. The Group members are being
asked to contribute the rest of the cleanup cost, perhaps $4 million or more.
Under the circumstances, we cannot understand why the MPCA feels compelled to pursue
a de minimis settlement. The University and the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have
received grant monies and have agreed among themselves to fully fund the cleanup. The
University and its redevelopment partners are legally obligated to pay past and future state costs.
A de minimis settlement primarily benefits the University, the City of St. Paul and the City of
Minneapolis. Such a settlement serves no public purpose. Because the MPCA's planned course
of action will seriously prejudice the members of the Group, we must pursue a vigorous course
of action to protect the interests of Group members.
THE MPCA'S DE MINIMIS SETTLEMENT PROCESS
Congress has specifically authorized the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to enter into de minimis settlements in Superfund cases. See 42 U.S.C. § 9622. By contrast,
the Minnesota Legislature has not authorized the MPCA to enter into de minimis settlements
under the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA). Moreover, the
MPCA has not adopted any guidelines or rules relating to de minimis settlements. Even though
the MPCA has no authority to enter into de minimis settlements, the Agency stands poised to
provide de minimis settlors with a broad - ranging covenant not to sue as well as contribution
protection under both the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) and MERLA.
If the MPCA proceeds with its ill- advised plan, Group members and others will be
deprived of procedural due process. This raises issues of fundamental fairness. A comparison
M
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 3
with the process used by the EPA illustrates the defects in the MPCA's process. Under the
federal process, before a de minimis settlement can become effective, the settlement must be
published in the Federal Register. The MPCA has no plan to provide the public with any notice
of a proposed de minimis settlement. The EPA must allow a thirty (30) day period for public
comments from those who are not parties to the settlement. Your staff has indicated they will
not accept any public comment. The government may withdraw from the settlement if the
comments "disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is
inappropriate, improper or inadequate." We met with your staff and attempted to raise these
issues and concerns. We left the meeting with the impression that the MPCA staff had "made
up its mind" on the Schnitzer matter and would not consider any new evidence.
Under the federal process, when a settlement is reached providing for private parry
cleanup (such as at the Schnitzer site), the settlement must be entered in court as a consent
decree. The MPCA is proceeding with an administrative settlement and has no plan to seek
judicial review. In the federal process,. a consent decree must be lodged with the Court at least
thirty (30) days before it is signed and entered. Finally, under the federal process, the Court -
- not the environmental agency that is interested in the outcome -- is to complete an independent
evaluation of the public comments received on the settlement. Without these procedural
safeguards in place, the MPCA's de minimis settlement process is fatally flawed. The MPCA
should not and can not go forward with that process.
VALUATION CONCERNS FOR THE DE MF IMIS PROCESS
The Group acknowledges that as a property owner the University may select a cleanup
option that considers or allows for a proposed development. However, the Group is under no
legal obligation to pay for a more expensive cleanup option. In this case, to accommodate the
interests of the Hubbard group, the University intends to spend approximately $4,900,000
(without any contingencies) to clean up a site it purchased for approximately $700,000. Other,
much cheaper options are available to satisfy the concerns of public health and safety, but they
do not meet the desires of the proposed developer.
We understand that to proceed with a de minimis settlement the MPCA must first
establish the value of reasonable and necessary cleanup expenses. We do not believe that the
MPCA can establish that figure without causing irreparable harm to the members of the Group.
The imprimatur of the state that $4.9 million is the reasonable and necessary cost of a clean up
of this site to protect human health and the environment would be very unfair to the Group.
Therefore, the University's current cleanup estimate of $4.9 million (without any contingencies)
for an unrestricted cleanup should not be applied. The University's estimated cost for cleanup
to a restricted use should also not be used since there is very little difference in cost. The most
appropriate number for reasonable and necessary response costs would appear to be that
I
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 4
prepared by the MPCA's unbiased consultant, West Central Environmental Consultants, for on-
site capping. That amount was estimated as $295,500. Any additional costs should be home
by the University, the Hubbard group and the municipalities who will primarily benefit from the
redevelopment of the property.
We also suspect that the MPCA staff has an interest in pegging the clean up i;osi at the
highest possible number because it has negotiated an agreement with the University which
requires the MPCA to recover some of its own costs from the de minimis group, rather than the
University. Therefore, MPCA staff, to increase its own recoveries from the site, may be
inappropriately influenced to select a larger cost of cleanup because that will potentially generate
more dollars to pay MPCA costs.
The MPCA professes to have no interest in the Group process with the University and
does not intend to participate in any cost recovery actions brought by the University. The
MPCA ought not get involved in that process indirectly by making valuation judgments that
accommodate the developer rather than focus on public health and safety.
SUMMARY OF SCHNITZER SITE OPERATIONS
The Schnitzer Group has reviewed the Schnitzer business records maintained by the
MPCA. We have also interviewed a number of former employees who worked in the yard, in
the metals room and in the bookkeeping department. Our document review and interviews
revealed critical errors contained within the MPCA's assumptions about the handling of lead,
batteries and transformers at the site. To date, the Schnitzer Group's investigation has revealed
the following key findings about the Schnitzer operation:
1. Bulk shipments of batteries and other lead received at the Schnitzer facility were
transferred from trucks to the metals room inside the main building. Batteries and lead were
weighed and accumulated inside the building. The batteries and lead were sold to Schnitzer as
products. Schnitzer paid its customers and the receipts used by the MPCA to identify PRPs
document these transactions. The main building was located on the South Parcel and is not
subject to remediation under the recently- negotiated Response Order by Consent.
2. Schnitzer held the batteries in the warehouse which was locked each night. Other
valuable non - ferrous metals were also stored in the metals building. When sufficient quantities
of batteries and lead had accumulated, Schnitzer would sell loads and arrange for off -site
shipment via rail or truck. We have attached copies of invoices detailing off -site shipments of
over 400,000 pounds of whole batteries and lead during the 1977 to 1983 time period (the same
time period on which the MPCA bases its claims against the RP Group). The Schnitzer business
records contain other invoices documenting over a million pounds of off -site shipments of lead
N
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 5
and batteries. The amount of off -site shipments far exceeds the amount used by the MPCA to
establish liability in its PRP identification effort.
3. MPCA staff speculated that Schnitzer broke or cracked batteries and that releases
from those operations contributed to the contamination at the site. The Schnitzer site history
indicates that battery breaking only occurred on a one time experimental basis inside the building
on the site at a time long before the current business records utilized to establish liability in this
matter. A review of the business records reveals that although Schnitzer owned a piece of
battery breaking equipment, it was sold in May 1972. The documents related to that transaction
confirm the statement made by Schnitzer representatives that any breaking of batteries was done
only on an experimental basis and inside the building.
4. The only batteries handled in the yard were those in automobiles that arrived at
the Schnitzer facility. Automobile scrapping operations at the Schnitzer yard date back to at
least the 1950s. Although it is possible that some of the batteries from these cars were crushed
or burned with these vehicles, the Schnitzer employees we interviewed indicated that car
batteries were removed from cars, stored temporarily on pallets in the yard and routinely added
to stockpiles in the metals room. We are not aware of any documentation indicating that any
of the members of the Schnitzer Group sent automobiles to the Schnitzer site. One of the
employees we spoke with told us that the City of Minneapolis had a contract with Schnitzer to
handle all abandoned vehicles. That may mean that the City of Minneapolis could be one of the
largest responsible parties. Presumably that is why it has joined with the University as a
remediating party.
5. During the period 1950 to 1970 an undetermined number of transformers were
accepted at the Schnitzer site. Based on interviews with former employees, a limited number
of transformers were accepted on an irregular basis and only during certain years of operation.
Transformers themselves are not 'a source of PCBs. Rather, the alleged source of PCBs is
contaminated transformer oil. How the transformers were handled and whether they contained
contaminated transformer oil with PCBs is unclear and the basis for liability on the part of PRPs
is questionable. In fact, the available data revealed that the PCBs that are prevalent at the site
are predominantly Aroclor 1248, a specific form of PCBs not associated with transformer oil
(Aroclor 1260). Although the MPCA identified the University as a source for transformers, the
MPCA's de minimis process attributes no liability to suppliers of transformers.
6. Other activities associated with the handling of scrap metal, particularly, the
burning, dismantling and crushing of cars, the discharge of gasoline to the ground, the handling
and storage of uncleaned motor blocks and the handling of porcelain coated tubs, sinks and
appliances (containing capacitors) together with the processing of other painted scrap metal,
contributed significantly to the lead and PCB contamination at the site.
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 6
After interviewing former Schnitzer employees and reviewing the Schnitzer business
records, we have concluded that the PRPs named by the MPCA should not be held liable for
response costs incurred by the State or the other remediating parties. Our preliminary
assessment of conditions at the site, including a review of aerial photographs, observation of
debris and forensic sampling, are entirely consistent with this position. Since de minimis parry
liability is premised on the same set of erroneous assumptions, the MPCA should immediately
suspend its efforts to settle separately with de minimis parties.
In sum, the MPCA has identified the wrong set of responsible parties at the Schnitzer
Site. The MPCA should consider the evidence presented in this letter, review the information
in MPCA files and withdraw the Commissioner Notice Letters issued to Group members and
de minimis parties that informed those persons of their potential liability at the Schnitzer Site.
THE MPCA'S PRP IDENTIFICATION PROCESS
In addition to our concerns about the fairness of the MPCA's de minimis process, we are
troubled by the MPCA's handling of the PRP identification process. The MPCA identified the
members of the Group as PRPs after reviewing Schnitzer business records dating from 1977 to
1983. This is obviously a very small window in the life of the Schnitzer site. The MPCA
conducted a mail survey of a few former Schnitzer employees but inquired only into the handling
of transformers at the site. The MPCA did not conduct any interviews of former Schnitzer
employees even though many of these individuals still reside in the Twin Cities area. Finally,
the MPCA made no effort to review business directories or other available historical sources of
information.
Based on this cursory review, the MPCA determined that Group members were PRPs
because they each shipped more than a total of 3,300 pounds of batteries or lead to the site or
records indicated the shipment of transformers to the site. The MPCA named approximately 60
other businesses and units of local government as de minimis PRPs. Any party who shipped less
than 1 per cent of the total volume of lead was arbitrarily placed in the de minimis category.
The MPCA has provided no rationale supporting the disparate treatment of Group members and
de minimis parties.
The basis for the MPCA's assertion that PRPs and de minimis PRPs are liable for the
cleanup of the Schnitzer site is found within Minn. Stat. § 115B.03, subd. 1. Responsible
persons are defined under that section to include persons who arranged for the disposal,
treatment or transport for disposal or treatment of a hazardous substance that was released at a
facility. At the Schnitzer site, the MPCA has concluded that the mere storage of batteries and
other forms of lead triggers arranger /generator liability under MERLA.
(c
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 7
Although the Schnitzer site may have been impacted by lead and PCBs, the evidence
available in the MPCA's file and gathered in interviews with former employees does not support
the MPCA's liability determination for any of the PRPs or de minnnis PRPs who brought lead
or batteries to the site.
The MPCA either ignored or failed to even consider available information relating to
operational practices at the Schnitzer site. For example, the initial Response Order by Consent
required the Schnitzer representatives to submit a site history detailing past operations. That
document revealed that the company stored batteries inside the main building and transported
batteries to other facilities for disposal.
In 1993, the MPCA retained a consultant to conduct a lead treatability study of the
Schnitzer site. Based on input from the MPCA, COGNIS reported that the "lead contamination
is presumed to have come from battery recycling activity." However, after analyzing samples
from the site, COGNIS characterized the site as "contaminated with lead in the form of lead
containing porcelain enamel glaze, leaded paint debris, wire solder, miscellaneous ionic lead
species and possibly some lead acid battery residues." Despite receipt of this information, the
MPCA inexplicably focused its PRP identification effort on the PRPs that supplied batteries and
soft lead. Given the information we have uncovered relating to the history of operations at the
Schnitzer Site (which is discussed further below), this focus seems particularly misguided.
DEFICIENCIES IN THE MPCA'S PRP IDENTIFICATION PROCESS
Last year we .visited the MPCA's offices and requested access to the Schnitzer business
records which are in the custody and control of the MPCA. When we sought to review these
records, MPCA staff expressed surprise. They assured us repeatedly that a painstaking and
thorough review of the documents had already been completed. We understand that the MPCA
has included costs associated with the PRP identification effort in its cost recovery demand.
Despite the assurances we received, we proceeded to conduct our own independent review of
the Schnitzer business records.
We found a number of serious problems associated with the MPCA's review of the
Schnitzer business documents and the Agency's attempt to identify PRPs. A review of electronic
mail logs and internal memoranda demonstrates that the PRP identification process was sloppy,
inaccurate and incomplete. In an April 15, 1996, a staff memorandum prepared after review
of Schnitzer documents was completed characterized the process as follows:
"During my examination of files compiled by Jeff Buss and worked on by Shawn
Ruotsinoja, I found numerous oversights and errors... I asked Jeff months ago to
go through the files and identify any sites (PRPs) which had any unresolved
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 8
issues ... (List of 19 PRPs) ... Based on my review of these files, I think we have
missed several important RPs and must do additional checking to see if, in fact,
responses we have gotten are telling the truth. There have been major
oversights in the management of these files. These mistakes represent 16,632
pounds of lead and 2 RPs who contributed transformers. So we are iboking at
three major RPs and possibly 10 to 15 more de minimis parties." (Emphasis
added).
If the MPCA staff did not express any confidence in the PRP identification effort, it follows that
neither the Schnitzer Group or any of the named de minimis parties should accept the accuracy
or validity of the MPCA's "waste -in" list. After the MPCA discovered its own incomplete and
shoddy work, the Agency revised the "waste -in list" by adding two parties, Amoco and U. S.
Transformer, to the Group.
In April 1994, earlier in the PRP identification process, another staff memorandum
expressed surprise with the fact that after review of the business records there were over 500
parties that sold battery lead, lead or soft lead to Schnitzer during the period 1979 to 1980.
Staff estimated that 75 names were relatively obvious but that additional follow -up work
(reviewing business directories, phone books and interviewing employees) would be required to
identify other PRPs. In a reply memorandum, lower level staff were instructed to name the 75
companies named on the shipping slips, and ignore the remaining 425 names.
Hundreds of parties should have been identified as PRPs. During the PRP identification
effort, the MPCA compiled a list of over 1,000 names from Schnitzer weight tickets and a
separate list of 3,818 checks paid by Schnitzer to various parties.
MPCA staff have conceded that this was one of the first sites that the MPCA has
attempted to identify PRPs. Clearly, the MPCA had embarked on an ambitious project.
However, when the Agency discovered that significant extra work would be required to complete
an accurate PRP search, the MPCA abandoned the effort.
Instead, of admitting that it lacked the resources to properly complete the PRP
identification process, the MPCA used its "short list" of readily identifiable names and aborted
the remaining effort. This cavalier approach casts a cloud of doubt over the MPCA's entire PRP
identification effort. While it may have been expedient for the MPCA to proceed in such a
fashion, the process is extremely unfair to Group members, de minimis parties and to the public.
Under the circumstances, the MPCA's pattern of conduct constitutes a violation of the
Minn. Rules Pt. 7000.0300 that provides that:
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 9
"In all formal and informal negotiations, communications and proceedings and
other dealings between any person and any member, employee or agent of the
agency, it shall be the duty of each person and each member, employee or agent
to act in good faith and with complete truthfulness, accuracy, disclosure and
candor." (Emphasis added).
Given the agency's knowledge of the limited nature of the PRP search and the deficiencies noted
in this letter, it is totally inappropriate for the Agency to proceed with the de minimis settlement
process.
Although the Group completed only a preliminary review of the Schnitzer business
records maintained by the MPCA, we found other major discrepancies in the naming of PRPs.
These types of discrepancies fall into several different categories:
Improperly Categorized De Minimis Parties. After review of the Schnitzer business
records, the MPCA placed Unysis (formerly Sperry Univac) into the de minimis group.
According to the list compiled by the MPCA, Unysis sent 1726 pounds of batteries to the
Schnitzer Site. Our review of the Schnitzer records indicates that Unysis actually sent 4,789
pounds of batteries. (See attached Exhibit B). Under the MPCA's allocation formula, Unysis
should be a member of the RP Group not the de minimis group. Although we have not yet
completed a detailed record review, we suspect that other de minimis parties have also been
improperly identified as well.
Identified Parties Who Were Not Added to Either the RP Group or De Minimis
Group. The MPCA found weight tickets indicating that a company named Gould sent at least
2,335 pounds of batteries to the Schnitzer Site. The MPCA concluded that because Gould did
not appear in either the Minneapolis or St. Paul telephone directories, they could not be located
and, therefore, should be dropped from the de minimis group. The level of inquiry was grossly
inadequate. Gould's successor, GNB Battery Technologies, Inc., is a large, prominent company
that deals with lead and batteries across the country. No effort appears to have been made to
determine whether Gould and /or GNB Batteries supplied enough batteries to be a Group
member. Given the MPCA's own admissions that the PRP process identification was
mishandled, it is possible that numerous other companies that have been "released" from liability
could be added to either the RP or de minimis groups.
Parties Who Were Not Identified. During our review of the Schnitzer business records,
we identified an invoice, dated July 6, 1982, from Root Equipment Supply located in
Minneapolis, Minnesota. (See Exhibit Q. The invoice indicates that Root sent at least one
transformer and other equipment that may have contained PCBs to the Schnitzer site. The
checks paid register compiled by the MPCA indicates that Root Equipment may have had
C1
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 10
additional transactions with Schnitzer during the mid 1970s. The MPCA has determined that
any party that supplied transformers to the site should be added to the RP Group. Root
Equipment Supply is an active company that is in the business of selling electrical supplies in
the Twin Cities. Once again, Root Equipment Supply and perhaps many other companies should
be added to the RP Group.
These oversights and errors are not insignificant. By passing over parties who should
have been named as RPs and overlooking major battery suppliers who should have been named
as PRPs under the MPCA's theory, the MPCA has skewed allocation of cleanup responsibility.
With a cleanup estimated to cost approximately $5 million, the MPCA's actions have had a
major financial impact on Schnitzer Group members, many of whom are small businesses and,
in one case, a unit of local government.
By the MPCA staff s own admissions, the PRP identification effort was poorly conceived
and conducted. The findings of the Group, based on a preliminary review of the MPCA's files,
demonstrate the fundamental flaws with the MPCA's work. Based on the information that has
been uncovered to date, the MPCA should not proceed with a de minimis settlement. The
MPCA's erroneous assumptions about who should be named as PRPs at the Schnitzer site affect
all members of the Group. The impact is particularly severe on Group members whose overall
contribution of batteries or lead is just over the arbitrary one per cent figure determined by your
staff.
RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
In providing the above comments and objections, the individual members of the Schnitzer
Group do not admit that they are responsible for any release of hazardous substances, pollutants
or contaminants that may have occurred at the Schnitzer site. The Schnitzer Group, and its
individual members, specifically reserve all of their rights and defenses that may be asserted if
the State or an other entity seeks to recover costs of any kind from the Schnitzer Group or any
of its individual members. This reservation includes not only legal defenses, but also issues
related to the scope and cost of the proposed or completed cleanup at the site.
Under the federal de minimis process non settling parties clearly have rights to intervene
to oppose such settlements. United States v. Union Electric Co. et al, 64 F.3d 1152 (8th Cir.
1995). The Group intends to vigorously assert its rights both as to the de minimis process and
its ultimate liability. The Group urgently requests that the MPCA stop or abandon its de
minimis process and reassess the entire PRP designation process in this case. Failure to do so
may force the Group to take other legal action to protect its rights.
)0
Commissioner Peder A. Larson
April 15, 1997
Page 11
If you have questions about anything in this letter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Goa ty��,�
Lee A. Henderson ` p 0
oseph G. Maternowskl
JGM:mjy
cc: James Warner, MPCA
Dale Thompson, MPCA
Dale Trippler, MPCA
Jocelyn Olson, Assistant Attorney General
131778 -1 0626200.000100
BCC Schnitzer Iron & Metal Merla Site Group
EXHIBIT A
SCHNITZER IRON & METAL MERLA SITE GROUP MEMBERS
1.
H. Brooks Company
2.
Electric Machinery/Dresser -Rand
3.
F. M. Frattalone
4.
Ford Motor Company
5.
Midway Chevrolet
6.
Midwest Jobbers
7.
John Morrell & Company
8.
Navistar International
9.
Northern States Power
10. Onan Corporation (Cummins Diesel)
11. Saint Anthony Villa;e
12. Sears Merchandise Group
NOTE: The University of Minnesota, the City of Minneapolis, the City of St.
Paul and the Metropolitan Council have withdrawn from the Schnitzer Group and
have not participated in the preparation of this letter.
1245321 0626204000100
IZ
EXHIBIT B
SPERRY UNIVAC'S BATTERY SHIPMENTS TO SCHNITZER
DATE
ITEM
POUNDS
2/8/80
Scrap Battery
136
4/23/80
Scrap Battery
140
6/25/80
Scrap Battery
40
10/3/80
Scrap Battery
84
11/3/80
Scrap Battery
80
12/4/80
Scrap Battery
88
10/2/81
Scrap Battery
48
11/30/81
Scrap Battery
470
2/16/82
Scrap Battery
109
4/22/82
Scrap Battery
634
5/14/82
Scrap Battery
301
7/9/82
Scrap Battery
128
10/1/82
Scrap Battery
80
3/7/83
Scrap Battery
420
5/4/86
Scrap Battery
112
7/20/83
Scrap Battery
1341
10/4/83
Scrap Battery
78
10/4/83
Scrap Battery
630
2/24/84
Scrap Battery
280
11/7/83
Scrap Battery
206
TOTAL
4,789
108458 -1 0626200-000100
i 1.0
✓J�
ILCPT
70
.M
0.
1,3
UNIVAC
PAYMENT BY'.
M1MARKCO FOR
r-,-7
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
.1 J
p� /7m F
URE MS
03 �� 9E-Z-,, I L T1
CERTIFICATION: Seri rcprcsen is maI w'm .opcu 10 -- � I as an n'nJcJ.
..•„�...• it has /rdly romohrd wrfh the Farr Lahm Srdndd'dn ACI o 1536.
I�\
i
I
I
b.d I , i W f-0 INVOICE. NUMULM
I!
n BOA
U DATL 2R 'h ^ = CONTRACT NUMBER
NT NO. s_ j
(1.Vv
E.B. rrACPT. - ISHIP: PPO /COL $HIP VIA (CUSTOM R
PAYMENT BY:
DTO1211- —j (—
p0 G
IPPEO TO: J�'{A, �V ✓ <�-F�N�' —T MARKED FOR:
.H
SS 1111
J
AUTHORIZED SIGN% -L % "- ••t5 -_
ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
NO.
T
I j
_j SHIPPED FROM TE:
li
DEST. ORIG. .
J i .
PACK BY INSP�CTEO
l J
VNSII : HE MS �s
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE
Lor,
C NCB
S?
.G
1 LoT `I`G-
IN�T bey Gt
3
CN6T Wes.: G�,' j (4'-o Las
BILLABLE NON -BILLr TILE
x 0
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
AMOUNT
- oTxlgo
ce-
CNE� C- -H r`' 1/0
�G✓ W
-
I
CEIII IFICATION.!i"' •....irn ^rnti Ihdr l nr. :�•cI W u:• a.•:+.n..-r,,.» •:I Uw•.v nrlr,....J %ur rn.: n.v S.nna: rrc of the nrrr.n:< rovanvf I
}i
wrrnrO', rt hds hdW crrrnpin•p w•pr nrp r,ru I r:p.' 'i Srr, l.rd• •1c• ail L'I, GY. .r. dnnwJrJ
UNIVAC PARK*. P.O. BOX 3525 DUPLICATE
=FErZRY +UNIVAC ST. PAUL MN 55165 INV
IH IPM ENT NO. RED DATE ORDER DATE CONTRACT NUMBE48 BOA
c.IP VIA ICUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER TERMS INV
ACP1
S
3/
AB-ER
SOLD TO: , / A
SCHNITZER IRON AND METAL
2703 TERRITORIAL RD.
ST. PAUL, MN. 55114
SHIPPED TO:
I-
I_
NET Iii
INVOICP /'
ICE NUMBER I I
"
32 ji
019996.0 2
ICE DATE
05 -06 -d
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS
RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE MS
ITEM DESCRIPTION Of ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOU
NO.
0 T S 9 885370 SCRAP
ALUMINUM
1640 LES a .50
OTSv 85373 SCRAP
ELECTRICAL WIRE
1737 LBS a .46
CLEAN SCRAP COPPER
56 Les a .65
SCRAP 60/40 SOLDER
25 LeS n 3.00
OTSb 85373 SCRAP
STEEL OUMPSTER
1000 LES 1; .02006
0 T S 9 95379 SCRAP
ELECTRICAL WIRE
P70 LES o .43
CLEAN _CRAP COPPER
76 LES @ .63
SCRAP BATTERIES
140 LPS o- . ^6
SCRAP 83'. NICKEL
172 IRON
11C LFS a I.CS
OTSI; E5380 SCRAP. F AL?
S T Ei- IC.�AU M
2 L' D C1 4 i1.S lol a D �+� 1p`Lt
BALANCE DLE
ra
a r. • F ra�x!SV'.
L.ry I
1'
x!
�� S1
N� I
920.50
799.L2
36.40
75.0
20.06
374.10
47.68
11.2n-
1 .50
40.12
___ ----- 8_
i
P.O. e ro
tall y pyJ;;t{y/ MNU. NAC DSO P.O. BOX 1 SE
PLEASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC :�h �$ CA! ®13�PENO�EPARfUENT 7T2a ST. Louts, �U� '
AT NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN. $OF PASADENA, MISSOURI 0.1195 N.Y N.Y.
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE CALIFORNIA 91050 100" _
CERTIFICATION: Seller represents Mat with respect to the production o/ tha articles and /or the performance of the services covered by this
invoice, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as minded 4
UN- 3380 -t (REV.5/t9) SPERRY UNIVAC IS A DIVISION OF SPERRY RANQ CORPORATION
i
1
9
LO -OO -DG
11
CONTROL NO. y UCHII
!'210016(Y .OQ
PAYMENTBY:
SHIPPED FROM I
N/A
TE
090536 032
!A
c.
DEST. ORIG.
00000000 0
;I
J
41619000 �,0,
J
L_
.
I f ?'
PACK BY
INSPECI
MARKED FOR:
_I
F—
BILLABLE NON -61 SLAB
E'
NS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTI,
PAGE 1
AC26
I1
FL
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS
RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE MS
ITEM DESCRIPTION Of ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOU
NO.
0 T S 9 885370 SCRAP
ALUMINUM
1640 LES a .50
OTSv 85373 SCRAP
ELECTRICAL WIRE
1737 LBS a .46
CLEAN SCRAP COPPER
56 Les a .65
SCRAP 60/40 SOLDER
25 LeS n 3.00
OTSb 85373 SCRAP
STEEL OUMPSTER
1000 LES 1; .02006
0 T S 9 95379 SCRAP
ELECTRICAL WIRE
P70 LES o .43
CLEAN _CRAP COPPER
76 LES @ .63
SCRAP BATTERIES
140 LPS o- . ^6
SCRAP 83'. NICKEL
172 IRON
11C LFS a I.CS
OTSI; E5380 SCRAP. F AL?
S T Ei- IC.�AU M
2 L' D C1 4 i1.S lol a D �+� 1p`Lt
BALANCE DLE
ra
a r. • F ra�x!SV'.
L.ry I
1'
x!
�� S1
N� I
920.50
799.L2
36.40
75.0
20.06
374.10
47.68
11.2n-
1 .50
40.12
___ ----- 8_
i
P.O. e ro
tall y pyJ;;t{y/ MNU. NAC DSO P.O. BOX 1 SE
PLEASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC :�h �$ CA! ®13�PENO�EPARfUENT 7T2a ST. Louts, �U� '
AT NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN. $OF PASADENA, MISSOURI 0.1195 N.Y N.Y.
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE CALIFORNIA 91050 100" _
CERTIFICATION: Seller represents Mat with respect to the production o/ tha articles and /or the performance of the services covered by this
invoice, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as minded 4
UN- 3380 -t (REV.5/t9) SPERRY UNIVAC IS A DIVISION OF SPERRY RANQ CORPORATION
i
1
9
.!Lt,l I-,Ll. Inca UA: of. Ii (),.I C CONII RACT N'JW.CL-fi COA
I UsItAs INVOICC
Tz — kf Vill
srm I
um E rt PIECES VIGI. rh I COST OA1 17 W.; E D PK I. .,IrT. UTC
j
C."N.
0 10.
PAYMC-N C fly:
P, slwri:c) Fii�cl
Drt;T. zTi1 G.
4
--,IPPED TO! MARKED FOR:
evevkl
el
A-i I'Fl
171 r, S IG t.::U.^._ Nis fAs
!TFIA r )E I S �.MPTION' OF ITEM 0 U A NT IT Y UNIT PRICE 4f.',OUN17
V:2c
D C
Po/d
XJ cl LIL
DOA /30, as
........... .......
ri
os-A 11t) —4
...... .. ......
t�j- 14
614-
...... ....... ..
I ltd llx ffx(- INVOICE /OTS
e� ..
INVOICE NUMBER .
SHIPMENT NO.
RED DA. F
ORDER DATE
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
F.O.O. A PT.
SHIP: PPD /COL
SHIP VIA
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS
INVOICE DATE
c2�
ABER
PIECES
WGT.
FAT-COST
DATE SHIPPED
- °6-
PKT.
MKT.
0) G.
X30
vROJECT
602-
CONTROL NO.
VOUCI -ER
SOLO TO PAYMENT BY:
I— —� r
SHIPPED FROM
TE
DEST. ORIG.
J 70S
L—
/J �MARKED FOH:
UPPED TO: (// IlNA/ —I � —1
P/y
PACK B�'
IIr'
TEI-/7Y
,
>3LE
,l ) //� j/ '
BILLABLE NqN BILL
�S FJ iGN j J F3
UR[ MS
"HORIZDSIG
URE MS R P N518 ESIGN
ITEM
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
NO.
- —
-
-
o�V.
U�t
EWEzGNr
NI' �
-
�� JD % N =CKE ,L
0T
R o,v
os-
S C P 601qO S4Ld6 -R
LOT
IVET W Es CH r `
it
NEB t, ✓Ex GAT
l' k L
jSCL6/9�j
Sc2yP Cope
CICo�
T
� :gin -tI
I�
F
I
CERTIFICATION: Setter represents that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance of the serrims covered by ni
oTvoim, it has fully conplied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended.
3PEI�Y,rUNIVAC ST.
i1PMENT NO. RED 511 rE ORDER OATS
00 -00 -00
O --1 ACPT. SHIP: PPD /COL SHIP VIA
S
VAC PARK, P.O. BOX 3525 DUPLICATE INVOII
PAUL MN 55165 INVOICE NUMBEF
CONTRACT NUMBER BOA 03?
019998.
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER TERMS INVOICE DATE
NET 30 07 -09—
P.O -OD -DO I I I
;OLD TO: PAYMENT BY:
SIA" r SIAM
SCtaPtITZER IRO`. AND METAL SCHNITZER IRON AND METAL
2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD 2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD
ST. PAUL MN 5511LI1 LST. PAUL MN
SHIPPED TO: MARKED FOR:
041080 0
SHIPPED FROM T
090536 072
DEST. ORIG.
030000000/
55114 416190001
_I
PACK BY INSPEC 1
BILLABLE NON- SIOLAB
El CI
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS, -1
PAGE 1 OF, ;
J L J A030
_ I
AUTHO R IZEDSIGNATURE MS RESPONSIB LE SIGNATURE .MS
ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNTI.
NO.
OTSH 85403 j
MISCELLANEOUS SCRAP
STEEL
2400 LRS Dl .0075 EACH b•0'
OTSO 85406
SCRAP ALUMINUM DUMPSTER
1600 LES a .37 EACH 59c.I0
OTSR 95416
SCRAP HYDRAULIC STEEL
PRESS WITH MISCELLANEOUS
SCRAP STEEL
6547 LBS a .006 EACH 51.24
OTSS E5418
SCRAP ELECTRICAL WIRE
677 LBS a .40 EACH 277.8^
OTS11 8541E
SCRAP 832 NICKEL,
172 IRON
309 LbS a 1.05 EACH 324.45
OTSb 85418
SCRAP 60/4C SOLDER
130 LBS Dl 3.00 EACH 39J.�C
OTSA 85418
SCRAP BATTERY
40 LBS d .C5 EACH 2.00
CONTINUED ON NEXT AGE
PLEASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC - SPERRY RAN EI,[T I ' DbD P.O.. L 1a15e P.O. I
AT NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN. DEPA RTMERT 1Y1. ST. LOUIS, tRURI
SCF PASADE106 MISSOURI e7ti5 fl
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE ,
CAlIFO RNIA x1650
CERTIFICATION: Seller represents flat with respect to the production of the articles end /or the performance of the services co.emd by this
invoice, it has fully eonwffed with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. as amended. (� t
m.v 9=1 encnov 14imo, m n nw ctnm nc cocoov oaun rnaono.Tmu \ I
c 1a
N:Y.
��CCj�� �` UNIVAC UNIVAC PARK, P.O. BOX
--FEr
3525
INVUI(
�`' �r
ST.
PAUL
HN 55165
INVOICE NUMBER
iHIPM ENT N0.
REO GATE
ORDER DATE
CONTRACT NUMBER
J
BOA
032
— —
05 -03 -74
A037 ,
019998.
SHIP: PPO /COL
SHIP VIA
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
_
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS
TERqTO
MS
INVOICE DATE
=.O.B.
ACPT.
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
NE
10 -03-
[
NO.
;
PIECES
WGT.
FRT -COST
DATE SHIPPED
PKT.
M00
31. ,BER
SCRAP STEEL DUMPSTER
-00 -00
PAYMENT BY: 0710069N
SOLD TO: r
SIAM Sian SHIPPED FROM
SCHN.ITZER IRON AND METAL SCHNITZER IRON AND METAL 090536 032
2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD '2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD DEST.ORIG.
00000000
L_ ST. PAUL MN 551 LEI• PAUL MN 5511W 41619000
PACK BY INSPE(
S MARKED FOR:
HIPPED TO:
r _I
5
SPERRY RAND - UNIVAC DSO P.O. BOX 1AI56 P.O. !0x'11111!1011
LAI EASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC DEPARTMENT 1214 ST. LOUIS, CHURCH S'{. STA
T N EAREST ADDRESS SHOWN. SCF PASADENA, MISSOURI 60115 �Y' N LEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE CALIFORNIA 2IOSO 9'
CERTIFICATION: Seller represents that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance of the services covered by this
invoice, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended.
UOI 33WI (REV. 5tr0) SPERRY UNNAC IS A DIVISION OF SPERRY RANT) CORPORATION
BILLABLE NON - BILLABLE
❑ ❑ ..
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
J
PAGE 1 OF:
A037 ,
TR
I
_
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS
RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE
MS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT.
[
NO.
;
OTS# 85467
SCRAP STEEL DUMPSTER
{
1260 LBS al .02676
EACH
34.25
OTS# 85463
�e
'
I
SCRAP STAINLESS STEEL
1700 LOS a .05
EACH
O
85.00
s
OTS# 85460
SCRAP ELECTRICAL !'IRE
660 LOS a .42
EACH
77.20
I'
OTS# 85460
},,.r'
SCRAP 83Z NICKEL,
-"
173 IRON
256 LOS o 1 .05
EACH
:'
=! ?;: 270.90
OTS# 65460
i
X�.
SCRAP BATTERY
n.: -:• "'
' • ° -`''a
84 LOS d .C9
EACH
C : !:. ' =:'
='y 7.56
OTS# E5460
100% SCRAP CHROMIUM
15G LPS d .55
EACH
" -F• 82.50
OTSh 89423`.
::., •:
SCRAP ALUMINUM DUHPSTER
1140 LOS a .45
EACH
513.00
- - - - --
-- - - - - --
BALANCE DUE
I
1276.41
5
SPERRY RAND - UNIVAC DSO P.O. BOX 1AI56 P.O. !0x'11111!1011
LAI EASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC DEPARTMENT 1214 ST. LOUIS, CHURCH S'{. STA
T N EAREST ADDRESS SHOWN. SCF PASADENA, MISSOURI 60115 �Y' N LEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE CALIFORNIA 2IOSO 9'
CERTIFICATION: Seller represents that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance of the services covered by this
invoice, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended.
UOI 33WI (REV. 5tr0) SPERRY UNNAC IS A DIVISION OF SPERRY RANT) CORPORATION
UNIVAC PARK,
P.C. 60x 3525
"`•" "L
�
I°
INVOICENUMBFFt -.
-�� �J,rUNIVAC
=I —C ?T ST. PAUL
MN SSI65
032
3.'
:MIPMENT 14 RED DATE
ORDER DATE
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
- -
i5 -03 -74
019998.E
: ACPT, SHIP: PPO /COL - SHIP VIA CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER TERMS INVOICE DATE
D B
NET 30 I1 -03 -li
S
PIECES WGT. FRT C'ST DATE SHIPP ED PKT. MKT. ORE. PROJECT
J(; �BER
D 11
GO -D -DD
CONTROL NO. V(¢IXH(R
PAYMENT BY:
—T 0161 UG 19N OU�30
SOLD TO: _I E—
S1 AM SHIPPED FROM I TE
Scf4,to1ZER Ii;Of< AND METAL SCHNITZER
IRON ANL' METAL 090536 03[i Ili
2703 IERRITCRIAL BOAC 2703 TERRITORIAL
ROAD OEST.ORIG.
U'O0ii000GO0 i
ST. PAUL YN 551 j 1ST. PAUL
MN 551141 4161900' IL'i
L_
PACK BY INSPECTED BY
SHIPPED TO: MARKED FOR:
---
OILLAOLF NON DILL{ BLE
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIOt{S
�- PAGE I GF
A038 i
HL
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE MS
ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT I `
NO.
OTSh 69428 ELECTRICAL
CABLE ON 1kOCDEN
REELS
1427 LBS a .05
71.35
OTSst 69432 SCRAP
ELECTRICAL MIRE
320 LbS a .44
167.20
CLEAN SCRAP COPPER
69 LbS c .C<5
44.65
{i
SCRAP 83% ICKEL
171 Ii:Ok
262 LI?S w 1.05
Z75.1C
SCRAP TITANIUM
SHAVINGS
1155 LDS u .15
23.25
SCRAP BATTERIES
R0 LES c .09
7.20
OTSt 89435 CONTAMINATED
ALUMINUM -
4920 LP.S o'. .05
24o.09
�
OTS9 89437 SCRAP
41
q�q
STEEL OLIMPS TER
21E0 L65 r, .03167
•. ,'•fit. -�
'" {69.04
1
OTSA 89439 SCRAP STEEy� f; *.
Yj
CI,MPSTER
<w
:•..
31.87
940 LPS a .5339
;..r,:
'i "0 U
—
BALANCE UDE ";'
935.86
:
�+
SPERRT RAND - UNIVAC 050
PO BOX fUie P.O. BDX.ltgld
CHU" C" ST. STA
PLEASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC
DEPARTMENT 1144
ST. LOUIS.
KY_ W.T.
AT NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN.
SCF PASADENA.
MISSOURI 0195
'00G
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE
CALIFORNIA 91050
I, the
W,,,ims co emd by tills
CERTIFICATION: Seller represents that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance o
invoice, it has fully, compiled with the Fair Labor Standards Act of f939, as amended.
UD113fD1(REV.SR91 SPERRY UNIVAC IS A DIVISION OF SPERRY RANQ CORPORATION I.
JLLJNIVAC u"IVAC PA-N1 P.O. SOX 31-25 uurut_AIL INVOIC�
--F-F
TS
-
Er RY1r 51. PRUL MF. 55165 INVOICE NUMBER
I
"
1-
iHIPMENT NO. RED DATE ORDER DATE CONTRACT NUMBER BOA OT.2
�
I
- - 0'_- G'_ -7v :1SS98.C;
1
'.0.8. ACPT.
SHIP: PPD /COL
SHIP VIA
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS
INVOICE DATE
<
NET 'O
12 -O4 -EI
3i ABER
PIECES
wGT.
FRT -COST
DATE SHIPPED
PKT.
MKT.
G.
PROJECT
i
CG -CC -00
10
CONTROL NO.
y
L�1"jt�A
SOLO TO: PAYMENT BY:
_7 -�
* S 100 3GN
ZTd
3I
F— _IAM r S 1 A M
SHIPPED FROM
E;:
SCH`lIT:EG IRON ANii METAL SCHNIT2ER IRON AND METAL
FS3S36 032
j�1;
2703 TERR1TO:iIAL ROAD "1.703 TERRITORIAL ROAD
DEST.ORIG.
1( 19C^Gl!
�
rT. PAUL M "t 51113 t1. PAUL. MN 55174)
5
41EISCFOIIO
i
SHIPPED TO: MARKED FOR:
PACK BY
INSPEC
BY
r- .5 05 36 —1
;EQ
BILLABLE NON - BILLABLE
SPERRY UNIV AC
DEFENSE SYSTEMS DIVISION
❑ 0
1'NI VAC PA9Ns P.O. SOX 3'-25
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIP
S
51. Pi UL MN 551651 t_ J
PAGE , 9F
j
PL
_
AUTHORIZEDSIGNATURE MS RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE MS
1
ITEM
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUN
NO.
OTSP 85443 SCRAP
j
ALUMINUM OU;- :PSTER
122: L9S a .44
536.cC
j .
UTS4 85448 CLEAN SCRAP
COPPE
4:1 L S S L .C5
2EO.C5
SCRAP ELECTRICAL
jll
;1RC
1
216 L S d .44
55.04
!
SCRAP 831 NICKEL,
17; IFON
289 LPS - 1.L5
3:'_3.45
SCRAP 64TTERIES
8E LFS :. S
7.52
SOAP EI40 SOLOF6
:3 LF1 � d 3.;:0
99.
OT'SA 85451 SCRAP STE.LL
DUMPSTCi:
I
LRS .C32tiE
.'.1.51
---- -- - - - - --
-------- = -r-
I
E.ALAF.0 DUE
1334.77
'
i
i
I
I
:
i
i 1
I
PLEASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC
SPERRY RANOLNNAC DSD
P.O. BO% 14155
PA. BOx ,,1Oe16
patRCNS SfA
AT NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN.
DEPARTMENT taza
SCF PASADENA,
5T. LOUIS.
1LT�'N.
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE
-
CALIFORNIA 21050
MISSOURI 87195
10049
CERTIFICATION: Se /ler represents that with respect to the production of dw articles and /or the performance of the servims co r:d by this
invoice, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of F938. as amended. 'V71-
UDI,VMI1REV.4t91 SPERRY UNNAC IS A DIVISION OF SPERRY RAND CORPORATION //
Stt�4 UNIVAG pRG1r�A� _:►nrvola �oTS:'
. EIIFMtNT NO. RED DATC
U / ? ORDEP. DATF ]
v
-- • + - - INVOICE NUMBE
CONTRACT NUMBER BC'a
r
F.C.B. ACPT. SHIP. PPDrCOL SM IP VIA
E
CUSTOMER ORDE RNUMBER TERMS INVOICE DATE
1I
UMBER PIECES WGT.
FAT -COST DATE SHIPPED PKT. MKT, ORG. PRO.IE CT
LD TO PAYMENT BY _
CON TIC O.
'VOUCHER
SHIPPED FROM
/U3 ZQ )e=- o R04
TE
DENT. ORIG.
� M: NNc�fb'd5�
SHIPPED TO: J
MARKED FOR:
PACK BY INSPECTEO BY
BILLABLE NON - BILLABLE
"T.OIIIZEOSIGNATI IRESPOrSIBL
El
SPECIAL INSTRUC TIONS
SIGN RE MMMSSS
ITEM
N0.
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UN IT PRICE
AMOUNT
SCRAP
LvT
67
S �
P
Lt o OT
f�
o
L3 (NE I4JE =GH S •
:
6.
1 (I L0�-T
_
�t crl,- ��d CGS
�S� xlo
PEA Lb.
o
O
c t3 T 7E:R:zE_s C Q
CNE'r «,ts Gy r ' �� Gas
07N
s = 3
iJ Lf&
L3
STA :r c.SS �W LOT
C
E- �. G/f-r ; =
�SSs, a��
ES
L
S •'7
CERTIFICATION:
Sehb/ =eo=e mnr. M.• ..:.•. __�_. __
... ^• • °•H�..• •� ••F arooucnon or the ortickr and/or the perlormsnre o! the mrvlrer co. and by rh•r
nrolce, it hat !ully eomplyd Kith the Fair Labor Stsndardc d,r nl rou
9 .T -1 UPIICAT �OUNIVA o A E `
JL1 11� II\ /A/' i iLm1_ -1- 11 K/QTS
71 .�I--,','(11r—LJIVIVn`,. S1. YA'UL
e,N
INVOICENUO
2
1
019998.0 3d
KIPMEN O.
REO DATE _
OR R T
�i _�� X74
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
.0.�. ACPTS.
SHIP: PPD /COL
SHIP VIA
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS
NET '0
INVOICE DATE
12 -16 -80
i
PIECES WGT. FRT -COST
D/jO SOOP OO PKT. MKT. ORG.
PROJECT
V .MBER
IJ
CO OL NO. V E
960165N 6
"?
YMENT BY:
SOLD TO: PA
r S I AM —I r
S I AM
_1
' -
SHIPPED FROM
TIE
SCHNITZER IRON AND METAL SCHNITZER
IRON AND METAL
L90536 032
1
2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD 2703 TERRITORIAL
ROAD
DEST.tOpi6G19p
ST. PAUL MN 55114 ST. PAUL
MN 5511Q
411167900010
J
PACK BY INSPECTED
BY,
L.
MAFlKED FOR:
SHIPPED TO: 090536 _I F—
—�
BILLABLE NON - BILLABLE
SPERRY UNIVAC -
DEFENSE SYSTEMS DIVISION
❑ p
UNIVAC PARK, P.O. BOX 3525
SPECIA Try s
b �� a
ST. PAUL MN 55165
F'�:
"•,
J L
A044 i :I
i
L_
J
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE
MS
�.
i
ITEM
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT ,
NO.
i
DUMPSTER
/-
176C LBS @ .02765
48.66
OTS 96893 SCRAP ELEC
WIRE 651 LOS a .33
214.83
CLEAN SCRAP�COPPER
439 LC S .2 '.58
254.62
L/
SCRAP 60140 SOLDER
10 L'uS m 2.50
`25.00
SCRAP BATTERIES
�-
48 LE'S a .07
3.36
j
SCRAP STAINLESS STEEL
241 LUS a .24777
.59.71.
OTS 96894 SCRAP STEEL
DUMPSTER
1020 LBS a .02319
23.65
OTS 96895 CLEAN SCRAP
COPPER
122 L6S a .57
`., \\
69.54
SCRAP 831 NICKEL, /� 1
17% IRON
414 LBS -w 1.05
434.70
OTS 96898 SCRAP
/`I
ALUMINUM DUMPSTER
1140 LOS al .37
yl
421.80
OTS 969_4 SCRAP STEEL
,�'/
CUMPSTER
;
102C LUS a .02274
23.19
OTS 96911 SCRAP
ALUMINUM SHAVINES
DUMPSTER
CON71NUEC ON NEX4PAGE
SPERRY RAND-UNIVAC OSD
p,0. CO% ttlS6
p-O. 6D2 MM64
PLEASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC
DEPARTMENT 1124
ST. LOUIS
CNURCII 5T- STA f
F -
AT NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN.
SCF N0.
MISSOURI 61/95
11.1Y�SY
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE
ORNIA 91050
CALIFORNIA
I
CERTIFICATION: Seller repfesenn that with respect to the production of the art cros anaror me ,
invoice, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended
UDI-31 1 (REV. SrM / SPERRY UNIVAC IS A DNISION OF SPERRY RAND CnAMQATInN ' v
OW
lNAL ;.
INVQIC
:HIPMENT NO. RED DATE ORDER DATE CONTRACT NUMBER BOA
o n. "I 11 _/z -}7�
Q.O.B. ACPT. SHIP: PPD /COL SHIP VIA CUSTOMER OR
�CIE- RS
9 JMBER P CES WGT. FRTCOST
,OLD TO PAYMENT BY:
,O —�
SCN�Iy'�ZER RaN�i��rti�
,9t %o3 Tc'9P27bR=,9L AogD
�SA�NTI''�Pt1dL� /icsNN � L
SHIPPED TO: ` MARKED FOR-
_, /C �
AUTHORIZED 51GNA T U MS
ITEM I DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
TERMS IINVUILC L
T
7
ES OO NS I B LEST GN URE MS
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE
s�
I S RA.P E&CGT�C.AL. �v�R ] L OT
(,ter l�JCL TH , - /-L- j j
LAC/rte
03. sG b? P GOIL -o
� 1E A,w � �u ; c °�, PAS.
t 03S x t�')
EJQTS
a,c ., �, _
R
BILLABLE
I K
SPECIAL INS
,�•soAx l
A
L
= S9�
G c i} Po M z�� ]LO7
S P� P
CNET we '-L
Gft-f 1�� �� N� VRLc
Na v cuE eR
� nL
� g I
rol
CERTIFICATION: Selkr mprvrena N•r with rwsp&cr to the prodvcr ^on of Ne •n;Cks ind /or the perfOrm• m of the xnias eov,Td Dr tn's, 7 I
PAYMENT BY;
ILE'
�AL;fv �IVC-T-4L CO
MARKED FOR:
HIPPED TO: YS
MS
v 0
that with aspect to the production of If, .,ticks and /oar tht WfOrm�c` Of
CERTIFICATION: Selkr fflPffl�ntt
jawke, it ha fuljV weWliod with the Fair Lbor Smnd,rds Act of 1938, x�nded.
SPERRY CORPORATION SpEppy L�AC IS A 0rVISICN OF T .... .
LpD �-IWO-2
rev. -J1�-1 1 I\ 11\ /8(-
U1, ` 11-1 V II IJ
�: GIZt I -T- � 11 �t -r T�
INVOICE NUMBER
SHIPME T NO.
RED DATE
W, DATE
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
F.O.B.
ACPT.
SHIP: PPO /COL
SHIP VIA
E2R5
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS
INVOICE DATE
IMBER
PIECES
WGT.
FRT -COST
D TESHIPPED
- -
PKT.
MKT.
ORG.
9S
PROJECT
o
CONTROL NO.
VOUCHER
SOLO TO: PAYMENT BY:
�Aa�
S
aON•D
SHIPPED FROM
TE
DEST.ORIG.
L- S�(^ //�
SHIPPED TO: J MARKED FOR:
/ n _I -,
VV V V
/LjTF39 F�
tAIT'ZED fSIGIA
PACK BY
INSPECTED BY
BILLABLE NON BILLABLE
x ❑
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
RE MS ES NSIBLE SIGN URE MS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
NO.
O
SCRAP W =�E
1 Lo-r
(NFrvV6ZGNT
S Rai P .Q rTE2��s
Lo-�T
L
CERTIFICATION: Selbr mp ®tents that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance of the services covered by the /
invoice, it has fulN complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended
-""mar 0r41VAC PARK, P.O. bOX 3525 " "` -''r` INVOICEVOTS
It - ST. PAUL - MN 551.65
INVOICE NUMBER
03,
REG DATE
ORDER DATE
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
- -
05 -03 -74
019998.[1 3
SHIP: PPD /COL
SHIP VIA
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS
INVOICE DATE
S
NET 30
03 -12 -8
ER
PIECES
WGT.
FAT -COST
DATE SHIPPED
PKT.
MKT.
u.
PROJECT
00 -00 -00
11
10
CONTROL NO.
y9 UCHER
:OLD TO: PAYMENT BY:
-�
-, r
1.22 G 16 2 t1
101.037
SHIPPED FROM 11
Tf ,
SIArt SIAll
SCHNITl.ER IRON Ah(0 METAL SCHNITZER IRON AND METAL
090536 032 ;
1 .j
2703'JIFRRITORIAL VOA0 2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD
DEST.ORIG. ;
i
4161900010:
ST. I'ia!1. i Nt1 5511.41 L. PAUL MN 55114
41619unrillo
;HIPPED TO: 1 MARKED FOR:
PACK BY
INSPECTED BY
0905.;6 1 f
. PI. .ill IiY UMIVAC
BILLABLE NON - BILLABLE
'JLEF.`J5r SYSTCt; :1IVI SIOm
❑ p
OUTVAC PARK, 1'.0. 1,OX 3525
SPECIAL INSTRUCT16 NS,
ST. f..1.fL MN S51J t J
PAGE 7 Lf'. '
AC4`i
_
.IL
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE MS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT!
NO.
7110 LBS l-e .02497
17.48
OTS 11303 SCRAP
ALUI.7I111,111 SHVG OUMPSTER
71111 LSS (1 .30 T
210.60
✓
OTS 11310 SCRAP STEEL
OUMPSTER �)
12801 LLIS a .023(,3 \�1
30.25
OTS 11311 SCRAP
\ )
ELECTRICAL kIRE
j
866 L )S' 3 .76 1
225.16
CLEAN SCRAP COPPER
/
31.0 L'S m .52
161.20
t/
SCRAP OATTERIES
1'79 LRS cl .05
5.4',
OTS 11::12 SCRAP STEEL
OUYPSTER
1100 LSS 3 .02363
25.99
UTS 11313 SCRAP
CALCULATORS
/
3340 Li,S 11 .0025
r 9.35
t
OTS 113:5 SCRAP STEEL
DUMPSILR
/
29611 tCbS @ .02363
67.5A
✓
ors 1119: SCRAP STEEL
OUMPSTER
i
- "- :1760.LbS a .02185
38.46
- OT5 11320 HEAT /COOL
COPPER EXCHANGERS
✓ i
3140 LbS n .13
408.20
i
15ALANCE DUE IG j�I .
2396.93
j
PLEASE REMIT SPERRY UNIVAC
SPERRY RAND - UNNAC DSO
!/
P.O. BOX 155
P.O. Box 1. 1.4
AT NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN.
DEPARTMENT 172a'
SCF PASADENA,
ST. LOUIS,
CHURCH ST. SfA
N.Y.. KY
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE
MISSOURI 0.3tY5
CALIFORNIA !1050
10619
CERTIFICATION: Selkr mpmmnts that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance of the services covered by this
invoice, it has fully mmplled with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, at amended.
DI.1380-1(REV. SfM SPERRY UNIVAC IS A ONISION OF SPERRY AANQ CORPORATION 17/1
�i
�I
I ri
Y
,--, ter-- t--7v- jIt - I I n I n /a('
uur -Li, ll_ INVUII,t /UIJ
CERTIFICATION: Sel.er represents that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance of the services covered by th,s 01
invoice, it has fully complied with the fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended. v
INVOICE NUMBER
SHIP ENT NO.
REO DATE
OR ER DATE
b
G
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
F.O.B.
RCPT.
SHIP: PPD /COL
SHIP VIA
Ezes
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS
INVOICE GATE
1MBER
PIECES
WGT.
FR�ATE
HIPPED
22
PKT.
MKT.
O G.
arsl
PROJECT
CONTROL NO.
VOUCHER
SOLD TO: PAYMENT BY:
—� F—
r CH t v:or�?Qep), TRponl �/m er,4L
SHIPPED FROM
TE
DEST. oalc.
p( 20`S
.SAZn� his 1'Iz/�'N��oT4 -�
PACK BY
WSPECTED 8Y.
L — .�S
SHIPPED TO: MARKED FOR:
BILLABLE
BILLABLE NON
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
/� -`-F3
AUTHORIZED NATURE MS RE PONSI E 51 ATURE MS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
N0.
oz;7-)
"sGNT
®
CLEIj,J SC W COPPER,
O�.
S C RA P /Cd/k� �LoT
3�7G
�T WE s G�I-r • ,� 3
za.
�J
CERTIFICATION: Sel.er represents that with respect to the production of the articles and /or the performance of the services covered by th,s 01
invoice, it has fully complied with the fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended. v
•
VOICE NUMBER
FSHIPMENT O.
REU DATE
OR ER DATE
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
T.
SHIP: PPD /COL
SHIP VIA
g� RS
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS JINVOICE
DATE
B/L NUMBER
PIECES
WGT.
FRT -COST
DATE SHIPPED PKT.
MKT.
PROJECT I
o 0
:
SOLD TO PAYMENT BV:
I
CONTROL NO
SHIPPED FROM
TE
JL '7^'j y/� A ` CH!•'S
�/ O� `.. R /"r�' •�/lt R�/7 d
DEST. ORIG.
SHIPPED TO: / MARKED FOR
PACK BY
INSPECTED BY
BILLABLE NON BILLABLE
I]
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
T-F3Z- T�
e.117el
SIGNATU S AU R S IBLE ""AT
I N0
I DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
CLGAAI SC RA P c o P PER
T
LO
!
CNE,— WE�OH, Q
\"
�=� s� x,�
= -�! 7 0
C >2A P EL6C-7R5. NHL
E 1v Es GHT
S R,9 P �B
LOT
Nei �vEz�h; �0 Gas
- -_- - --
SC C9E1�
�L07
(/YET wEzGf-17-:
l' OS Ek L8-
CS-
S C 124 /0 S74J --N ,S
C( �OT
r: i
Z2
c -,'
.I
CERTIFICATION. Selo, tep.esenn dNl ,64th nspscl to Ur p'oduc ROn of tM 8rt.e'/Es wrrd /o. FM per /omlrrta of thv rnroN <o.+nd DY t ^a
nw.a, it hr fulM 7JO it d ,6Yth Nr FAU Labor Sondrds Act of 1938, r ,6+rcnded. / n
VOI•3380 -3 9PETiRY UNVAC 5 A Dy1SION OF SPERRY CORPORATION `�
51=Er-Ry.- ,*— r\JIVAC UNIVAC PARK*,- b BOX 43525
ST. PAUL MN 55164
AtO DAVe 1 'DATE7 _'; VJCONTRACTIII� . UM8EF"4J,?0ev1l"'1 4144'111�
-"�Tm"T NO-, 05-)3 -4
A
:.O.B. ACPT. JSyW: PPD/CUL ISHIP VI
SEA PIECES
I I
ORIGINAL I
NET 30
00-OG-0c. I 1 1 1
SOLD TO: I PAYMENT BY:
ST SIAM
��CHNJIG�al V,Ab,N AND METAL SCHNITZER IRON AND METAL
2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD 27,23 TERRITORIAL ROAD
S'T. PAUL PIN 5511 t5T. PAUL MN
SHIPPED TO: MARKED FOR:
0:1536
SPERRY UNIVAC
DEFENSE SYSTEMS OIVISIO,'4
UNTVACC PAPK, P.O. ROX 43525
1ST. PAUL MN 55 16 41 1
--I
551141
019998.Oa39
INVOICE �DATE
06-11-82
G. PROJECT
CONTROL NO. IOUCHFFI
OS30142t. 0039
SHIPPED FROM ;ITE
090536 532
DEST. ORIG.
4 16 19 0.0 0 1
41619LOcl1z
PACK BY INSPECTED BYj ! I'
BILLABLE NON-BILLABLE
❑ ❑
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
PACE 3 OF
4 4
CM
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE ms
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM QUANTITY UNITPRICE AMOUNT
.❑1693 X 23DO L_nS 39.45
OTS 11351 SCRAP STEEL
DUMPSTER, 1 EA
fl
.0025 X 2497 LLS 6.23
OTS 11348 SCRAP STEEL
DUMPSTER, 1 LA
.01693 X 2U2L L5S 34.20
OTS 11352 CLEANI .SCRAP
COPPEP, 1 LOT
5U X 31-- LPS 155. U,0
SCRAP ELECTRICAL V IR j
.25 X 1,22 LSS 5
lo
SCRAP BATTERIES l L
75 x 301 LRc 15.u5
...... . . . . . . . .
flQVrcW?L!: T,
tt..
IRON, 1 LOT 't
1.55
X 15� LUS r 165.90 if
SCRAP STAINLESS STEEL
1 LOT
.22991 X 581 LES 33.35
BALANCE DUE 1993.17
PLEASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC SPERRY RAND-UNIVAC DSO 0. Box 14I56 P.O. 00' ' 6 4 i
AT NEAREST ADDRESS DEPARTMENT 'as ST. LOUIS. CHI=. ST7STAj
; SHOWN. �F PASADENA, N.Y_ 'T i I
PLEASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE MISSOURI WIGS
CAUFORNIA 91050 I . :
CERTIFICATION: Selkr represents that with - Mspect to the Production of the articles and /or the perfe"anor of the services coivmd by this
invOiw, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1936. as amended.
10I-33801 (REV. 51791 SPERRY UNIVAC IS A DIVISION Of SPERRY RAND CORPORATION
72Y�: UNIVAC
11
INVOICE NUMBER
SHIPIM T NO.
RED DATE
OR OEfl GATE
CONTRACT NUMBER
BOA
F.O. .
ACP
SHIP: PPD!COL
VIA
6�7_
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
TERMS
INVOICE DATE
F IMBER
PI E$
WGT,
FRT COST
DATE SHIPPED
T
PKT.
MKT.
ORG.
PROJECT
CONTROL NO.
y�j.ER
D TO: PAYMENT 01':
SC/Y /Uj T ^
SHIPPED FROM
-
Row
DEST. ORIG.
MARKED FOR
PACK El
INSPECTEC BY
.
EILLABLE NON BILL =BLE
SPECIAL INSTF'JCTOM_
AT.I�IED
IGNAT SP v51BLE 1GNA RE MS
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
I AMOUNT
OP
EZ_ E CT�Q\lrcnL ��-F
//
CN i
C, kfl,
y ER L6
a
UL
CERTIFICATION: Selkr mprviann Mat wiM respect to the Production of the arbcks and /or the Performsnm of me amen co.errd Cv rms
irrorcr, it has fulb mtnplrad with the Farr Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended. .7 '
- UNIVAC . P A-R ORIGINAL PE rRY.A*N IVAC OX 43525
INVOICE)OTS r, Tr -
t!��F�t.TJNO- e I
VO DATE TE' '�4 i5FRVA—TC- -k
-- .; � INVOICE NUM
cONTFrAC IN MeEft -SERI
•,51-33-74
O.B. I-0/UUL SNIP VIA
019998.Eq 9
CUSTOMER —ORDER NUMBER
JRCPT. J�S>W:
s
TERM S INVOICE DATE 1
NET 30 C8-11-82 11
LT B
BIER PIE
PIECES WGT.
FRT-COST DATESHIPPEO PKT. MKT. ORD. PROJECT
00-00-00
I
OLD TO: PAYMENT BV:
CONTROL NO.
VOVCHER
7. F—
0530142tv
C. D 71 9
I SIAM .1.
5CP'.N-I.-TZEQ IRON AND METAL SCHNITZER IRON AND METAL
SHIPPED FROM
090536
TE
?7.E'3 TERRITORIAL ROAD 2703 TERRITORIAL ROAD
032
DEST. ORIG,
T. PAUL MN 551140 T. PAUL MN 5 51 L4j
41619000I0
4161960010
:HIPPED TO: MARKED FOR:
090536
PACK By
INSPECTED BY
:PERRY UNIVAC
BILLABLE NON - BILLABLE
)EFEN-'F SYSTEMS DIVISION
!NTVAIC PAPK, P.O. PDX 43525
D D
SPECIAPL INS RUCTIOF ONS
3T. PAUL MN 55164,
AGE 2
4--
-A.
qg7
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE -FiESPONSfBLf �Sl GNATURE
CH
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
OTS 11365 SCRAF,
ALUMINUM SHAVINGS
DUMPSTCR, i CA
.27 X 803 L-3S
216.00
OTS 11373 SCRAP VOLTAGE
Li
REGULATORS, 1 LOT
-0025 X 396C L B
9.95
-t-/
OTS 11374 S C R:A P, S T E:,E L:'k
DUMPSTER, 1 EA. .... .....
^1426 X.1130 LBS
8 3
✓
PTS 11377 S Cf -A-P
ELECTRICAL WIRE T,
.12 X 1538 LEIS
1 4.56
SCRAP 83% 'NICKEL,
IRON , I LOI
en
'4
SCRAP OATTEQI'ES
3 EA? -05 X 126
6.40
OTS /1136) SCRAP 'ST-CL
I I-
DUMPSTER-
565 X 13-,C Lc-s;
720.28
OTS 11355 SCRAP STEEL
DUMPSTER, I EA
CONTINUEU ON NEXT AGE.
EASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC
NEAREST ADDRESS SHOWN.
SPERRY RAND-UNIVAC DSO
DEPARTMENT 1214
'221
7P 0
P.O. BOX 141M
1414SO
P.O- box wit
EASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE
WFr PASADENA,
ST.
ST. LOUIS.
C
C"URCH $7. STA
CI=FtTIFICATION:Selkrmomwaftm.,�,A-.
CALIFORNIA So
F 91050
MISSOURI
U,
MISSOUM 63m
'3"
KY, ky.
1004 -
f
jN
•-v•f ui n arricws aqqlor the gwrlormano, Of the services cowmd by the, ..-.7
I-33W1 (REV. 5179) invoice, 111— fully complied With the Fair Labor Standards A ci of 1938, as amended.
SPERRY UNIVAC 13 A DIVISION OF SPERRY RANG CORPORATION
X
-d
S�ErRRy- UNIVAC ORIGINAL INVOICE /OTS
SHIPMENT NO. REO DATE ORDER DATE INVOICE NUMBER
CONTRACT NUMBER BOA
F.O.B. RCPT, SHIP: PPO /COL SNIP yIA
CUSTOMER pRDER NUMBER TERMS INVOICE DATE
JMSER PI ES WGT, FqT-
COST DATE SHIPPED PKT. MKT. ORG. PROJECT
3
SOLD TO: PAYMENT BV: CONTROL NO. yotX R
SUtnu�Z�R �- RLIAj /yEI�L
SHIPPED FROM TE
A703 Tu:- ,2tT6 ,,qi -1 Ro 9D
DEST. ORIG.
L T /V IV
SHIPPED TO:
PARKED FOR: PACK BY INSPECTED By
BILLABLE NON BILLABLE
I
L 7
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
Z
TH RIZEDSIGNAT E 4`L/F3z
RESP NSIBLE SIGN U S
ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
NO. I QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
SCIPi9P C.7L Lo - 3
NET- wE� CiiT ; /6�
S c Pj P (p3 570 AJ= G KEL
4 %7 `f% ROAD �O
C Lclyti S Rsr P
u
,vCT Lv Ez GH r
J�L
sGRtP �igT��ey i �(
CERTIFICATION:
x
;,I. J-�-;;L-1 ?,)
-79
� LC3.S a/ yC
x a
IN
i!
i
7'5EI�Y,rUNIVAC UNIVAC PARK, P.O. BOX k43525 c 'L1C�1` INVOICE /TOTS
- a 1 .
41PMENT NO...,._„ RIP,gAT.E_.._..�. -.. ORDE�i DATE ...
..... ..
' KUL
CONTRACT NUMBEq ^ -_.••• �:
MN 55164
-.
"BOA '
INVOICE NU_MQE R -, -_„
,- "• -.•�.• ••• -OER
- a5 -73 -74
....
I
0.6. ACPT. SHIP: PPD /COL SHIP VIA
CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER
^19998.L+D4 ^u
TERMS
INVOICE DATE I
'I OER PIECES WGT.
FRT -COST DATE SHIPPED
Nf: T 3,Q,
PKT. MKT. ORG.
12
PROJECT
`J0= 170 -0C � I1
:OLD TO: j„ I
PAYMENT BY: I=
CONTROL NO.
VOU ER
r
SIAM F— __�
SIAM
�
'�937110N
Qi14D
SHIPPED FROM
X90536
7E
I
5CNNIT7E17 RON AND p .ZER
I IFTAL SCI +NIT2ER IRON ANA Mt:TAL
27'13 7F aRITORIAL BOAC ?7,^,3 TERRITORIAL I:OAD
3 ,3L-
I
DEST.O
S T. PAUL MN cc 1� � T. P A UL
416190D01
MN 5511y
41619ii 0010
;HIPPED TO: MARKED FOR:
:;91,1536 F—
PACK BY
NSPECTEp BY
SP' PP U- ':IVAC
i
BILLABLE NON -BILLt SLE
DErENSE SYSTEMS DIVISION
U`.TVAC PARK, P.O. PDX 435,:5
0 0
S I. PAUL MN 5516
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
PAGE • 2 O F
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE MS - RESPONSIBLE SIGNATURE
E.M
MS
i
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
AMOUNT
SCRAP BATTERY, 1 Ea
.D4 X 80 LBS.
.
OTS 1702ii, SCRAP STEEL
DLIh;PSTER, 1 EA
.01192 X I,440 LSS.
TGUANTITYUN
OTS 17022, SCRAP
ALUMINUM SM.AVIN -S DUMP.
I CAt .2b X 800 L6S.
OTS 17023, SCRAP
ALUFI I NUM :-UMPS T. _R , 1 t A
.21: x 1,86t, LBS.
520.30
OT,. 17024, SCRAP STEEL
OUMPSTER, 1 EA
.01292 X 56, L . ;.. .. ..
20.16
I'
OTS 17034, SCRAP STEEL
DUMPSTER, 1 !.A
.01292 X <,IED
27.13
OTS 17036, SCRAP
ALLIMINUM '`UMPSTER, 41 E•A
.27 h 1.56; LBS,
421.20
OTS 17039, TANK
i
COMP!.I -SSF_D AIR I!OLDING
1 is A, .001 X 2,380 L`+S.
2.38
i
i:ALA,NCE DUE
- ----- - -- - --
_
- -- - ----- r-
�.
2437.59
...
.EASE REMIT TO SPERRY UNIVAC P .0 • i3 OX 1 c 86 2
! NEAREST
�REdnF �tM,9.ONOVi00BQrM
,X,y� , *�
ADDRESS SHOWN.
.EASE RETURN DUPLICATE INVOICE
P.ALIIMORE,MU.21263
# " # O
00- BOX 1H50
ST. LOUIS,
a .l !�1• 191F*
�•I
!I
s ee,0.SA,ipMiks #Xt
MISSOURI0.7,w,
"Y"
# #sueN oat
CERTIFICATION: Se /kr represents Mat with re
II
Iil� j
fj
Ii
R
I!I o
spect to the production Of the articks and /or the per formance of the wrvim, covered by this
n- 3780.1 (REV. 5f79)
invoiw, it has fully complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended.
SPERRY UNIVAC IS A DIVISION OF SPERRY RAND CORPORATION Lq
I:
it L
J'
3SS���s
t-3
71LOi 3
-7g
40 40,
S ��
EXHIBIT C
PURCHASE ORDER
'ROOT EQUIPMENT SUPPLY
3930 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55421
(612) 788 -9738
TO-
cr
ATTN:
ORDER ° 73 -31
DATE
r
i
VIA
;i
"r
j gg
[_rt
i
LAW OFFICES
HESSIAN, MCKASY &C SODER13ERG
PROMSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Minneapolis - Saint Paul • Washington,D.C.
April 25, 1997
Ms. Kim Moore -Sykes
Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418 -1699
4700 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -2228
(612) 330 -3000 Facsimile 371 -0653
INVOICE
Do (P- . 2,
Schnitzer Iron and Metal
MERLA Site Group Assessment for Tier III ....................... $3,000.00
TOTAL: $3,000.00
133531 -1 0626200 -"loo
LAW OFFICES
HESSIAN, MCKASY & SODERBERG
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Minneapolis • Saint Paul • Washington,D.C.
4700 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -2228
(612) 330 -3000 Facsimile 371 -0653
April 25, 1997
Ms. Kim Moore -Sykes
Saint Anthony Village
3301 Silver Lake Road
St. Anthony, MN 55418 -1699
Dear Kim:
Joseph G. Maternowski
Lee A. Henderson
(612) 330 -3000
The Schnitzer Group has authorized an assessment to Schnitzer Group members based
on the tiered assessment that has been discussed during past conference calls. As recommended
by the Allocation Committee, the assessments to Tiers 1 through 3 are $9,000, $6,000 and
$3,000, respectively. Schnitzer Group members participating in the April 24, 1997 telephone
conference call authorized the assessment.
Section 5.1 of the Schnitzer Iron and Metal MERLA Site Group Agreement provides that
all payments made by Schnitzer Group members shall be credited towards the members final
allocated cost or settlement.
The Schnitzer Group Trust Account balance is approximately $9,000. The approved
authorization provides that funds raised from this assessment be applied to the following tasks:
1.) payment of pending and future Common Counsel and Liesch invoices; 2.) preparation of a
complaint for a declaratory judgment action' seeking to forestall the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency's de minimis settlement process (this task would include an additional effort to
work informally with the MPCA and the Attorney General's Office to delay that process until
at least June 1997); and 3.) initiation of an effort to identify additional potentially responsible
'The Complaint will not be filed without Schnitzer Group review and further authorization.
Ms. Kim Moore -Sykes
April 25, 1997
Page Two
parties (PRPs) (Common Counsel would begin review documents held by the MPCA,
corroborate information with former Schnitzer employees, identify additional PRPs and report
back to the Group on the progress of these efforts).
Saint Anthony Village is a member of Tier III. We are enclosing a copy of an invoice
in the amount of $3,000.00. Please make your check payable to Hessian, McKasy &
Soderberg. We would appreciate receipt of your check so that the work to be conducted on
behalf of the Group may proceed. If you should have any questions relating to this assessment
or the status of activity on this matter, please feel free to contact Gary Brisban at Onan at (612)
574 -5834 or either of the undersigned.
Sincerely,
i
Joseph G. Maternowski
Cie
Lee A. Henderson
JGM:mjy
Enclosure
c:Wwm.]tr 0626200 Mioo
I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES
3 April 1, 1997
4 7:00 P.M.
5 I. CALL TO ORDER.
6 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M.
7 II. ROLL CALL.
8 Councilmembers Present: Ranallo, Marks, Enrooth, Wagner and Faust.
9 Also present: Michael Morrison, City Manager; Kim Moore - Sykes, Management
10 Assistant; Dick Johnson, Fire Chief; Jim O'Brien, Williams /O'Brien Architects.
11 III. REVIEW FIRE DEPARTMENT 1996 ANNUAL REPORT.
12 Chief Johnson presented the Department's Annual Report. He stated that he has
13 noticed an increase in emergency runs, especially in the neighborhoods. The most
14 noticeable increase in calls were as the result of CO alarms calls and downed power
15 lines.
16 The Chief also reported that the Fire Department purchased a VCR, TV and AV
cart with the funds donated by the Tri -City Legion. This equipment will allow the
18 Department to do more in -house training.
19 IV. CONTRIBUTION REQUEST TO RELIEF ASSOCIATION FOR
20 VOLUNTEER FIRE- FIGHTERS.
21 The Chief presented a request by the Volunteer Firefighters to increase the City's
22 contribution to the Relief Association. Various options were discussed. It was
23 decided to continue reviewing this request and bring it back to a future worksession
24 meeting.
25 V. UPDATE ON SAV II LIQUOR STORE.
26 The City Manager reported the status of the proposed construction of the SAV II
27 liquor store on the Tires Plus site. Council asked Staff to find out how much it
28 would cost to renovate the fagade of the Tires Plus building.
29 The City Manager reported on the roof inspection he received from KKE. The
30 Council questioned the City Manager about the soil conditions. He indicated that
31 Braun could do soil testings to verify conditions of the soil.
32 VI. UPDATE OF THE APACHE PLAZA.
33 The City Manager reported that the New Market store was closing at 7:00 p.m. this
'4 evening and Cub would be opening on April 4th. He also reported on the
_ proposed plans for the lot south of the Video Update store. He said that First Bank
1 expressed an interest in moving the bank to this site and selling their current site.
He indicated that there was some interest from the Freedom Gas Company to have
3 a gas station and car wash on the site as well. The Council voiced some concern
4 regarding the height of a gas station canopy.
5 Negotiations continue with Herberger's and Walmarc. The City Manager indicated
6 that OPUS is planning to present a proposal in a month or two.
7 VII. UPDATE ON CITY HALL /COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING.
8 The City Manager reported on the status of the punch list items. The Council
9 requested that the Finance Director provide them with an expenditure and revenue
10 report on the new building.
11 The City Manager reported that the demolition bids are due back in April.
12 Councilmember Faust indicated that when the City is ready to install play
13 equipment in designated areas, Community Services volunteers, the Kiwanis, and
14 other non - profit community service organizations may be able to provide labor and
15 money. He felt this is something that can bring a community together.
16 VIII. OTHER BUSINESS
17 1. Change in Precinct Location. The City Clerk reported to the City Manager
18 that Ramsey County approved the City's request to change the precinct
location from Apache Plaza to the storage garage at the Public Works
20 location on Chandler Drive.
21 2. Board of Review. Board of Review will be held next Tuesday, April 8 at
22 7:30 p.m.
23 3. Budget Planning Meeting. The 1998 Budget Planning meeting is tentatively
24 scheduled for 5:30 on August 5th in the Conference Room. The Council
25 Worksession is also scheduled for that evening.
26 4. Comprehensive Plan Update. The next meeting of the task force for the
27 Comprehensive Plan Update will be on April 29th at 8:00 p.m.
28 5. Old Furniture. The School District has indicated that they will be taking all
29 the old furniture and it will be removed for the Parkview building by April
30 15th.
31 IX. ADJOURNMENT.
32 The work session was adjourned at 10:05 P.M.
33 Respectfully submitted by
%4 Kim Moore - Sykes, Management Assistant