HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 10102017I CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 OCTOBER 10, 2017
4
5 CALL TO ORDER.
6
7 Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
8
9 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
10
11 Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
12
13 ROLL CALL.
14
15 Present: Mayor Faust; Councilmembers Gray, Jenson, and Stille.
16 Absent: None
17 Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey, City Attorney Jay Lindgren and City Planner Breanne
18 Rothstein.
19
20 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
21 ITEMS.
22
23 I. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 10, 2017 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
24
25 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City
26 Council Meeting Agenda of October 10, 2017 as presented.
27
28 Motion carried 4 -0.
29
30 11. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS - NONE.
31
32 III. CONSENT AGENDA.
33
34 A. Approval of September 26, 2017, City Council Meeting Minutes
35 B. Licenses and Permits.
36 C. Claims.
37 D. Resolution 17 -063; a Resolution Accepting Donations and Grants Received in the 3rd
38 Quarter of 2017.
39 E. Resolution 17 -064; a Resolution certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent Public
40 Utility Service Accounts to the 2018 Hennepin County Tax Rolls
41 F. Resolution 17 -065; a Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent Public
42 Utility Service Accounts to the 2018 Ramsey County Tax Rolls
43 G. Resolution 17 -066; a Resolution Certifying_ Special Assessments for Delinquent Waste
44 Hauler Accounts to the 2018 Hennepin County Tax Rolls
45 H. Resolution 17 -067; a Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Delinquent Waste
46 Hauler Accounts to the 2018 Ramsey County Tax Rolls
47
48 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the Consent
49 Agenda items.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 2
2 Motion carried 4 -0.
3
4 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.
V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF.
8 A. Resolution 17 -068: a Resolution denying a request for a 17.5-foot variance to build a
9 deck 7.5 feet from the property line at 3113 Edward Street
10
I 1 City Planner Rothstein reported today the Applicant withdrew their request for a variance. The
12 Council needs not consider the request and a letter will be sent to the Applicant tomorrow
13 confirming withdrawal of the variance request.
14
15 B. Resolution 17 -069 a resolution approving the minor subdivision request for the properties
16 located at 3725 Stinson Boulevard and 3701 Stinson Boulevard
17
18 City Planner Rothstein reviewed the minor subdivision to transfer land from the southern lot to
19 the northern lot for the purposes of future redevelopment of the 2701 Stinson parcel. The lot line
20 adjustment and transfer would add 70 feet to the 3701 Stinson lot and both property owners are
21 amenable through provision of Purchase Agreement. The Applicant/Owner is Apache
22 Redevelopment, LLC — Len Pratt. The existing land use /zoning designation is High Density
23 Residential/Planned Unit Development. The area is zoned Planned Unit Development, which
24 requires a development plan for re- development. There are no specified minimum lot sizes
25 within the district. The request is consistent with the submitted Development Plan for Silver
26 Lake Village.
27
28 City Planner Rothstein reviewed the guidance from City Code and noted the City Council may
29 waive compliance with the platting requirements of this subchapter and approve by adoption of a
30 resolution to that effect based upon findings by the City Council that compliance with the
31 platting requirements would create an unnecessary hardship or expense because of the nature of
32 the subdivision, and failure to require the filing of a plat does not interfere with the purposes of
33 this subchapter and the City Council may consider the number of parcels resulting from the
34 subdivision, the complexity of the legal descriptions, the necessity for dedication of streets or
35 drainage and utility easements, and the probability of future subdivision of the parcels (relating
36 to Section 151 Subdivision Regulations, Section 152.08).
37
38 Ms. Rothstein provided an analysis of the request stating it is for a minor lot adjustment, the
39 request does not change the land use or alter the site layout, the purchase agreement shows both
40 property owners agree to the minor subdivision, and the minor subdivision results in the increase
41 of the size of 3701 Stinson lot, making it more likely to redevelop.
42
43 City Planner Rothstein stated that Staff has reviewed the proposed minor subdivision and parcel
44 transfer requested, and recommends approval of the application, subject on the following
45 conditions:
46
0
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 3
Satisfactory submittal of evidence to provide proof of clear title (and resolution of any
outstanding title issues)
City Attorney review and resolution of any other outstanding legal issues associated with
recording of the minor subdivision and parcel transfer.
Councilmember Stille asked if the resulting Unofficial lot conforms with all parking and zoning
conditions and Ms. Rothstein stated the property to be conveyed is currently vacant with no
parking lot or building on the lot. The resulting parcel is .8 acres.
Councilmember Jenson asked what the growth in acreage is. Ms. Rothstein stated there is a 50%
increase in the size of the lot going from half an acre to .8 acres.
The Applicant was present but did not wish to address the Council.
Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution
17 -069; a Resolution Approving the Minor Subdivision Request for the Properties Located at
3725 Stinson Boulevard and 3701 Stinson Boulevard subject to the two conditions.
Motion carried 4 -0
VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL.
A. Resolution_ 17 -070: a Resolution denying The Comprehensive Plan Amendments PUD
PreliminW Development Plan/PUD Rezoning and Preliminary Plan related to The
Village, LLC Project Located at 2401 and 2501 Lowry Avenue
Ms. Rothstein reviewed the process to date for the Council and public. The Planning
Commission recommendation from their September meeting was reviewed. Revised plans were
submitted on October 2, 2017 and both sets of plans are included in the Council packet for
review.
City Manager Casey reviewed a letter he submitted to the Mayor and Councilmembers on
October 5, 2017 stating:
On October 2, 2017, the applicant submitted revised plans and additional information ( "Revised
Application "). This information revises the plan that was presented to the Planning Commission.
All additional information contained in the revised Application has been made part of the public
record, has been provided to Council and has been posted on the City's website. In particular, the
Revised Plan requires a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the portion of the proposed project
at 2401 Lowry which is proposed for affordable housing. In addition, the entire site requires a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) authorization, which is a form of rezoning.
The Applicant, by letter dated September 18, requested that the Council consider the Revised
Plan at this evening's meeting. Due to the revisions submitted on October 2, Council may
consider the revisions or may choose to ask the Planning Commission to consider the Revised
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 4
1 Application. Since the Applicant has requested that Council directly consider the updates
2 contained in the Revised Application, a draft resolution has been prepared for Council
3 consideration. The draft resolution addresses, in particular, the continued request for a
4 Comprehensive Plan amendment and a PUD. Based on Staff review of the Planning Commission
5 actions to date and the Revised Application, Staff concludes that certain of the concerns
6 documented in the staff report with regard to the original application remain in the Revised Plan.
7 Based on consultation with the City Attorney, Staff advises that the Council has significant
8 discretion in determining whether a Comprehensive Plan amendment and a PUD as requested in
9 the Revised Application are appropriate for the health, safety and welfare of St. Anthony. It is
10 Staff s opinion they are not. Staff has prepared a draft resolution for Council consideration, with
11 recommended findings, to deny the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the PUD. These
12 findings may be modified to reach a different conclusion during Council deliberations.
13
14 City Manager Casey recommended the project site appears to be a good candidate for a
15 Technical Assistance Panel ( "TAP "). The TAP process is a service offered by the Urban Land
16 Institute to consider a prospective project and offer alternatives that meet the interests of all
17 interested parties. If Council directs Staff, inquiries could be made as to the availability and
18 timing of a TAP for this project site.
19
20 Mayor Faust noted this is not a public hearing but the developer will be asked to speak, followed
21 by any public comments. Mayor Faust reminded everyone this is a single project application
22 brought by the developer. The affordable housing components do not stand alone. Mayor Faust
23 has a strong desire to see affordable housing in this community and specifically on this site.
24 Council's duty is to look at the entire PUD and make a reasonable, rational, and well considered
25 decision on whether this proposal matches our community's vision. The project as a whole will
26 be considered this evening. There has been criticism by the developer of City Staff, including the
27 threat of litigation. Mayor Faust stated the Council has full confidence of City Staff and their role
28 is to strive for a fair and equitable process, remain in a neutral role and not pre -judge an
29 application. Staff can't design the project for the developer and Staff doesn't vote. Mayor Faust
30 stated he has full confidence that Staff did this throughout the process.
31
32 Ms. Traci Thomas, Vice President of The Village LLC, noted The Village LLC owns over 15
33 acres in the City of St. Anthony Village. She reviewed the initial vision for the land included in
34 the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Thomas provided a PowerPoint presentation showing their plan.
35 She quoted Mayor's comments from the 2/14/17 EAW public hearing. The revised proposal
36 includes a reduction to 40 units per acre on the 2501 Lowry Avenue site, dropping the unit count
37 to 97 (the number of homes that were in Lowry Grove) on the 2401 Lowry Avenue site as
38 replacement housing, reduced heights of buildings, additional storm water storage, increased
39 connectivity and access with internal roads and trails, and additional parking. Ms. Thomas stated
40 the changes were made in good faith thinking the Council would have a discussion about the
41 project rather than just saying no after another hurdle presented was met. The 2401 Lowry
42 Avenue site meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance and Alan Arthur, President and CEO of
43 AEON, will later note he is willing to meet the 40 units per acre as well.
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 5
1 Ms. Thomas stated to deny a proposal due to density is wrong. The City is relying on the 2008
2 Comprehensive Plan as the guiding source. That Plan does not address current factors. There are
3 existing issues that need to be resolved and less density creates an unfeasible development.
4
5 Mr. Jared Ward, Civil Engineer, reviewed the site challenges. He stated there are a number of
6 things to consider for the site such as traffic, grading challenges, storm water treatment
7 restrictions, building and garage entrances, building setbacks, walkability and connectivity of the
8 site, and fire requirements. Mr. Ward stated the revised proposal addresses these concerns.
10 Mr. Christopher Pelpovich, BKV Architect, reviewed the overall design of the project and
11 pointed out some of the major elements. He reviewed the buildings and their heights and
12 reviewed the pieces that have changed including Building C, exterior of townhomes, Building A,
13 Buildings B and E, Building D. Mr. Pelpovich stated the current plan shows 712 units with 867
14 enclosed parking stalls and 237 additional surface stalls with 100 being parallel parking along the
15 streets. Mr. Pelpovich reviewed the stages of the project and indicated the entire site would be
16 completed in 2022.
17
18 Mr. Brady Halvorson reviewed the overall concept of the site and landscape plan. There will be
19 sidewalks on both sides of the streets with lighting and boulevard trees. They wanted to make
20 this a comfortable inviting neighborhood that is consistent with the neighboring properties. Good
21 neighborhood and community design principles have been implemented. He reviewed the
22 outside space available to all residents, noting there would be room for 38 additional parking
23 spaces if some of the green space was given up.
24
25 Mr. Pelpovich returned to the podium and reviewed the outside of Building B and the number of
26 units within the building and parking. He also reviewed Building D, which would be the largest
27 building on the site, and the townhomes plan.
28
29 Ms. Mindy Michaels, Sr. Project Manager, provided insight into the design for the senior
30 components included in senior services building and the senior co -op building. She reviewed the
31 services available in the senior services building.
32
33 Ms. Traci Thomas returned to the podium and quoted from the Comprehensive Plan regarding
34 Lowry Grove development. She then reviewed the settlement.
35
36 Mr. Christopher Pelpovich reviewed Building E and stated one of the challenges is the ground
37 water contamination that is occurring. The same applies to Building B.
38
39 Mr. Alan Arthur, President and CEO of AEON, stated he is frustrated and confused with the
40 recommendation from the City Manager to deny the strong and compelling proposal by The
41 Village. He feels they have appropriately responded to most of the comments and concerns with
42 the previous proposal. He is discouraged the 97 homes from the Lowry Grove Mobile Home
43 Park might not be replaced. He does not see how 41.4 units per acre compared to the
44 Comprehensive Plan of 40 units per acre is a deal breaker. If that is the case, AEON would only
45 do 75 -80 affordable apartment homes to keep the density at 40 units /acre. He stated he is sad the
46 City would turn down the revised proposal.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 6
2 Mr. Jack Cann, Attorney representing the Lowry Grove Resident Association, stated about 60 of
3 the residents at Lowry Grove had homes that couldn't be moved. Most of those are at the mercy
4 of an extremely hostile apartment rental environment. He asked what the long -term housing
5 solution is on behalf of those residents. Mr. Cann referred to the City's website "Lowry Grove
6 Redevelopment" and read the principles. Mr. Casey's recommendation did not include any
7 analysis of affordable housing proposed for the project and the planning principles noted on the
8 website were not addressed. Mr. Cann quoted from City Code and asked why staff did a 180-
9 degree pivot when they learned there would be 110 units of deeply affordable housing and invite
10 the previous Lowry Grove residents back into that housing. Mr. Cann the City included in the
11 Comprehensive Plan the plan to redevelop Lowry Grove and get rid of its residents and by
12 requiring a density of 25 units /acre those residents will stay gone. He indicated there are some
13 potential legal consequences that have been conveyed to the City Attorney.
14
15 Mr. Bill Skolnick, Legal Counsel for Brad Hoyt and The Village LLC, stated he knows what the
16 City and surrounding areas are like because he lived in the area. Mr. Hoyt has given him two
17 missions this evening. Mr. Skolnick read a letter Mr. Hoyt had written in full. The second
18 mission was to give a perspective. He feels Mayor Faust's confidence in Mr. Casey's opinion is
19 misplaced in this situation as his opinion directly contradicts the facts and the findings. Mr.
20 Skolnick stated facts that were stated or written from the City, noting the City Attorney told one
21 of The Village staff this morning that Council would deny the proposal before even hearing the
22 evidence. He stated that is not the way it is supposed to work. Mr. Skolnick stated the City
23 Attorney had a conversation with Mr. Mergens this morning. Mr. Skolnick asked what happened
24 between Mr. Casey saying the more density the better as long as the City's infrastructure can
25 handle it and now. Mr. Skolnick stated he hopes Council will consider the revised proposal and
26 the importance of this development to the City.
27
28 Ms. Thomas stated she does not know the reason for the proposed resolution of 25 units /acre.
29 She would have loved to have that as redevelopment of the site benefits the community,
30 residents, and surrounding communities. She noted the proposal of 40 units /acre complies with
31 the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and requested Council approve the Preliminary PUD and
32 Preliminary Plat for 2501 Lowry Avenue and the Comprehensive Plan amendment to change
33 2401 Lowry Avenue land use.
34
35 Ms. Monique Dubos, 2601 Kenzie Terrace, stated there seems to be great progress on the project
36 and closer to the 25 units /acre but that is still a lot of traffic and density. She stated it shouldn't
37 be up to this development to address all the affordable housing needs in St. Anthony. She
38 addressed the planning goals and said going to the lower density of the range would be more
39 compatible with the neighborhood. Ms. Dubos stated at the last meeting, she had presented a
40 petition with over 800 signatures and added a page containing more signatures.
41
42 Mr. Perry Thorvig, 3112 Townview Avenue, mentioned three points, noting he was in Mr. Casey
43 and Ms. Rothstein's shoes for many years. He noted when you get the details of a potential
44 project, it's different than initial general discussions. Mr. Thorvig stated the developers have
45 made some concessions on reducing units but they have not heard a single word that the
46 neighbors said about the use of the alley. He offered an alternative suggestion to eliminate
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 7
townhouses and replace them with dry water retention ponds or rain gardens and recreation
space. He noted on TIF, it is not known how much is proposed and there would be no tax base
from this project for 25 years.
5 Ms. Ginny Lahti, 2601 Kenzie Terrace, stated she is in favor of the redevelopment of Lowry
6 Grove and affordable housing even to the level of 97 units. She is in favor of the rezoning of the
7 area to high density but within the allowable range of 25 -40 units /acre. She stated density and
8 height were always the issue and scaling back the density should not reduce the affordable
9 housing. She hopes an agreement can be reached between the developer and the City.
10
11 Ms. Patricia LeBossier, 2653 Stinson, stated there is an issue with flooding in her basement when
12 there is a heavy rain. She is concerned about the density. She noted the alley way is used as a
13 walkway for residents to the strip mall and she is concerned about keeping the City the way it is.
14
15 Ms. Carol Weiler, 2312 St. Anthony Parkway, referred to The Legacy density, the EAW Record
16 of Decision, and the letter from the Met Council regarding the EAW. She also referred to
17 Exhibits provided by the developer, noting density was the major concern that neighbors voiced
18 at many meetings. Ms. Weiler asked if an EAW has been done on the Bremer site since it was
19 added.
20
21 Mr. John Grevious, 2239 Wilson Street, thanked the Council for listening to the concerns, noting
22 most are livability factors based on density. He stated there needs to be a revised traffic study
23 given the comments by Hennepin County and he hopes the TAP is pursued.
24
25 Mr. Thomas Issacson, 2604 Pahl Avenue, stated he supports the resolution presented to the
26 Council. He believed that density needs to be reviewed as it fits within the existing
27 neighborhood. He is concerned about the use of the public alley and noted that employee parking
28 has not been addressed in the plan as well as weekend guests. There are issues at other CPG
29 properties. Mr. Issacson voiced his concerns about the townhomes and asked that CPG and The
30 Village settle with the Lowry Grove residents. He stated the affordable housing cannot
31 automatically go to Lowry Grove residents as that is illegal. He would like to see more
32 affordable units and recommended AEON as a partner for the City.
33
34 Ms. Kari Domeyer, Pahl Avenue, stated she lives very close to the former Lowry Grove site. Her
35 children attend St. Charles school. She is concerned with how the development will affect the
36 safety of the children going to the school, thinks this plan would negatively affect St. Charles
37 school and is not a good fit for the community. She requested Council support the resolution to
38 deny the current plan.
39
40 Mr. Tom Deegan, 2616 Pahl Avenue, supports Mr. Casey's discussion posted on the City's
41 website last Friday. He noted Lowry being a one -lane road now should be addressed in a new
42 traffic study. He stated he spoke with the State Fire Marshall yesterday and provided Council
43 with some documents about the Fire Vehicle Access Roads.
44
45 Mr. Chad Gillard, 2524 Pahl Avenue, requested the Council support Resolution 17 -070 as this
46 plan would not benefit the citizens of St. Anthony. He stated the density is 6 times that of the
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 8
I current density of their neighborhood and the units proposed are 2 -3- bedroom units. He felt
2 families moved into St. Anthony because of the school system. He looks forward to a plan that is
3 25 units /acre density, brings in tax revenue, and allows affordable housing that will enhance and
4 not overwhelm the current school system.
6 Ms. Barbara Sullivan, 2613 Lowry Avenue NE, stated she is concerned about the infrastructure,
7 water, traffic study, and the EAW. She stated the City needs to look at their resources.
8
9 Mr. Ned Moore, 3500 38`h Avenue S., representing the Assembly for Civil Rights, stated they
10 were involved in organizing the Lowry Grove residents. He is representing Antonia Alvarez who
11 is unable to make it tonight because her daughter is in the hospital. Mr. Moore quoted scripture
12 and demanded the City take responsibility for its actions and decisions and become a force for
13 justice rather than indifference. He felt the loss of Lowry Grove was in process for a long time
14 and that a group of residents concerned about the closing of Lowry Grove came to City Hall and
15 were told there was nothing for them to worry about. He stated residents looked to the City for
16 leadership and assistance and had requested meetings with the City Council but throughout the
17 14 -month process, Council had very little to say. Mr. Moore stated the developer said if they had
18 known they would be limited to 25 units /acre, they never would have bought the property. Mr.
19 Moore stated this is astounding to play `bait and switch' with the developer and the Council
20 needs to take responsibility for their role in the closing of Lowry Grove. He believed there was a
21 direct link between density and affordability and urged the Council to stand up for justice even if
22 it isn't popular and honor the commitment made to Lowry Grove residents in the 2008
23 Comprehensive Plan.
24
25 Mr. Dale Nugent, 2734 Stinson Parkway, stated he is very concerned about having this developer
26 as their neighbor. He felt Stinson Parkway was a jewel in the neighborhood and that traffic
27 studies were garbage that have been done so far because they contain many false assumptions.
28 Mr. Nugent stated there needs to be a do over and he is excited about the prospect of getting
29 affordable housing into Lowry Grove. Mr. Nugent stated he is not so certain about the developer
30 but the TAP proposal sounds good.
31
32 Councilmember Gray stated when Mark Casey was hired he was excited about having a great
33 City Manager and over the past 1'/2 years, he is convinced Mr. Casey is an outstanding City
34 Manager, probably the best in the State. Councilmember Gray stated he is concerned that
35 Council is ignored in the process since Council is making the decisions. He noted the Council
36 did not have any meetings with the developer. He stated he has concerns about the proposal but
37 if the resolution is supported, that does not mean the Council is against affordable housing. He
38 indicated he will be voting in favor of the resolution.
39
40 Councilmember Stille stated he will be voting in favor of the resolution, noting that trying to
41 shame the City for its lack of affordable housing is ridiculous since there are 1,458 rental units
42 and 84% are affordable at some level up to 80% AMI. In addition, 433 units have been
43 developed within the last 15 years and of those, 52% are affordable. Councilmember Stille stated
44 he agrees there is an affordability crisis but the burden cannot be placed on St. Anthony. He felt
45 TAP would go a long way in bringing people together, noting the Council is listening to the
46 resident's concerns.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 9
2 Councilmember Jenson stated he will be voting to support the resolution as stated, noting
3 compatibility with surrounding land uses is part of the Comprehensive Plan. He stated the
4 Comprehensive Plan states 25 -40 units /acre so 41.4 units are still not compliant with the
5 Comprehensive Plan. He felt the developer should have done its due diligence by being aware of
6 the Comprehensive Plan provisions.
8 Mayor Faust reminded everyone this is a single project brought to the Council by the developer
9 and the affordable housing project does not stand alone. He stated the Council wants affordable
10 housing and it is the Council's responsibility to look at the entire PUD and whether or not it
11 matches the community's vision. He felt this specific proposal does not meet community needs.
12
13 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution
14 17 -070; a Resolution Denying the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, PUD Preliminary
15 Development Plan/PUD Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat Related to The Village, LLC Project
16 Located at 2401 and 2501 Lowry Avenue.
17
18 The entire resolution was read by Councilmember Stille.
19
20 Motion Carried 4 -0.
21
22 Mayor Faust hopes this is not the end. He requested City Manager Casey to research the TAP
23 and invited the developer to participate. He would like to work together to make a project the
24 City and Developer can be proud of
25
26 B. Ordinance 2017 -03 • an Ordinance Approving the Comcast Cable Television Franchise.
27
28 Mr. Casey reviewed this is the second of three readings of an ordinance to approve the renewal
29 of the Comcast cable television franchise agreement. The third and final reading will be on
30 October 24, 2017.
31
32 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Second
33 Reading of Ordinance 2017 -03, an Ordinance Approving the Comcast Cable Television
34 Franchise.
35
36 Motion Carried 4 -0.
37
38 C. Quarterly Goals Update.
39
40 City Manager Casey provided the Quarterly Goals Update. As a result of the Annual Strategic
41 Planning Session, 61 action steps were created. This is for informational purposes and no action
42 is requested.
43
44 VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
45
46 Councilmember Jenson stated he attended a portion of the Fire Department Open House
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 10
Councilmember Stille stated he attended the Fire Department Open House, noting it could
become a true community gathering.
Mayor Faust attended Tech Dump and was also at the Big Rigs. He attended the Regional
Council of Mayors and ULI Advisory Board where a discussion of the Amazon facility was held.
VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM — NONE.
IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
Mayor Faust stated The Village Notes are out.
X. ADJOURNMENT.
Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 9:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debbie Wolfe
TimeSaver off Site Secretarial, Inc.
_ 7 `-
/, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Jerk