Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 04092019 If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313 or email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe. Call to Order.  Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on all of the following items: I.Approval of the April 9, 2019, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.) II.Proclamations and Recognitions. A.Swearing in of St. Anthony Village Police Officer Michael Milbrandt. (pp.1) B.Spirit of St. Anthony Award. Sandy Simon, 2017 Award Recipient presenting. C.2019 Susan G. Komen 3 Day Walk August 16-18, Eileen Barnick, Event Production Manager presenting. (pp.3-9) III.Consent Agenda. These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. A.Approval of March 26, 2019, City Council meeting minutes. (pp.11-18) B.Licenses and Permits. (pp.19) C.Claims. (pp.21-23) D.Resolution 19-028 a resolution Accepting Donations and Grants Received in the 1st Quarter of 2019. (pp.25) E.Resolution 19-029 a resolution Approving 3.2 Off Sale Malt Liquor license for Holiday located at 3810 Silver Lake Road. (pp.27-28) IV.Public Hearing. V.Reports from Commission and Staff. A.Resolution 19-030 a resolution approving a request for a 7.7 foot variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback to allow for an addition to the master bedroom and a front porch, and consider a request for a 10 foot variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback to allow for an attached garage at 3401 Harding Street. Dominic Papatola, Planning Commission Chair presenting. (pp.29-56) VI.General Business of Council. A.Resolution 19-031 a resolution accepting Amended Feasibility Report and Ordering Plans and Specifications for the 2020 Street and Utility Improvements. Justin Messner, Assistant City Engineer presenting. (pp.57-134) CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA APRIL 9, 2019 7:00 p.m. HRA meeting immediately after council meeting If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313 or email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe. B. Resolution 19-032 a resolution Awarding the Bid and Ordering Improvements for the Silver Lake Road Flooding Project. Justin Messner, Assistant City Engineer presenting. (pp.135-149) C. Resolution 19-033 a resolution approving the St. Anthony ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right of Way. Justin Messner, Assistant City Engineer presenting. (pp.151-185) D. St. Anthony Public Works Department Annual Report. Jay Hartman, Public Works Director presenting. (pp.187-199) E. Ordinance 2019-02 an ordinance amending the Parks Commission Purpose, Membership, Powers and Duties. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (2nd of 3 readings). (pp.201-204) F. Ordinance 2019-03 an ordinance adding Chapter 98 Small Wireless Facilities. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (final reading & adoption). (pp.205-225) G. Resolution 19-034 a resolution approving summary publication of Ordinance 2019-03. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.227) H. Resolution 19-035 a resolution Establishing Small Cell Aesthetic Standards. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.229-237) I. Ordinance 2019-04 an ordinance amending Chapter 33 Establishment of Fee Amounts to add Small Cell Fees. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (final reading & adoption). (pp.239-240) J. Resolution 19-036 a resolution approving summary publication of Ordinance 2019-04. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.241) K. Ordinance 2019-05 an ordinance amending Chapter 96 Right of Way Management. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (final reading & adoption). (pp.243-270) L. Resolution 19-037 a resolution approving summary publication of Ordinance 2019-05. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.271) VII. Reports from City Manager and Council members. VIII. Community Forum Individuals may address the City Council about any City business item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk’s record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. IX. Information and Announcements X. Adjournment St. Anthony Police Department I, MICHAEL MILBRANDT, DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT I WILL SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY. ON MY HONOR, I WILL NEVER BETRAY MY BADGE, MY INTEGRITY, MY CHARACTER OR THE PUBLIC TRUST. I FURTHER AFFIRM THAT I WILL FAITHFULLY, JUSTLY AND IMPARTIALLY DISCHARGE MY DUTIES AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN PROVIDING ASSISTANCE AND SERVICE TO ALL THAT LOOK TO ME FOR HELP TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY. APRIL 9, 2019 ______________________________________ POLICE OFFICER MILBRANDT ______________________________________ JEROME O. FAUST, MAYOR ______________________________________ JON MANGSETH, CHIEF OF POLICE 1 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION  Meeting Date: April 9, 2019 Susan G. Komen 3-Day Walk OVERVIEW: In front of you this evening is a request for the use of Silver Point Park as at Pit Stop for Susan G. Komen walkers as they go through the city on Saturday, August 17, 2019. Attached is: • Description of the Event • Description of a typical Pit Stop (for Silver Point Park) • Map of our route through St. Anthony • Two documents that describe ways to be involved with the event (from volunteering to becoming a partner) As for the actual event: • Expecting approximately 400-450 walkers • The first walkers are anticipated to arrive in St. Anthony approximately 7:30-7:45am • The last walkers should be exiting St. Anthony approximately 10:00-10:30am • Pit Stop set up would take place between 5:30am-7:00am (porta potties dropped off the evening before and zip tied shut) • The Pit Stop would be open from 7:45-10:15am • Pit Stop tear down would take place from 10:15am-12:15pm • Entirely off site by 12:15 and have the porta potties picked up shortly after • They will remove all trash from the park. 3 Susan G. Komen 3-Day® 55 E. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1010 Chicago, IL 60604 800-996-3DAY The3Day.org SUSAN G. KOMEN 3-DAY About the Event The Susan G. Komen 3-Day® is a 60-mile walk for women and men who are ready to end breast cancer forever. Participants raise a minimum of $2,300 and walk an average of 20 miles a day for three consecutive days, educating tens of thousands of people about breast health and raising funds to help support breast cancer research and community outreach programs. Over the past 16 years and 170 events, the Komen 3-Day has raised more than $848 million—which Komen has used to save lives and make huge strides in breast cancer research. In 2016, Susan G. Komen® set a Bold Goal to reduce the current number of breast cancer deaths by 50 percent in the U.S. by 2026. Seventy-five percent of the net proceeds raised by the 3-Day® help Komen support the global research program and other mission objectives, while the remaining 25 percent helps Affiliates support local programs including medical assistance, patient navigation and provider education, for example, all of which support Komen’s Bold Goal. Sponsored by Bank of America, the 2019 3-Day Series includes seven events taking place in Michigan (August 2-4), Twin Cities (August 16-18), Seattle (September 13-15), Philadelphia (October 18-20), New England (September 6-8), Dallas/Fort Worth (November 1-3), and San Diego (November 15-17). Please visit www.The3Day.org or call 800-996-3DAY for more information. Connect with us on Facebook at Facebook.com/The3Day, Twitter @The3Day and Instagram @Komen3Day. About the Funds The net proceeds raised by the Susan G. Komen 3-Day help Susan G. Komen® build a world free of breast cancer through research, community, care and action. The funds raised have helped Komen’s mission to save lives from breast cancer, by investing more than $956 million in breakthrough research and more than $2.1 billion to support people and communities most at risk through programs to provide access to screening, treatment assistance, patient navigation and education. SUSAN G. KOMEN About the Event Organizer Susan G. Komen is the world’s largest breast cancer organization outside of the federal government, funding more breast cancer research than any other nonprofit while providing real-time help to those facing the disease. Komen has set a Bold Goal to reduce the current number of breast cancer deaths by 50 percent in the U.S. by 2026. Since its founding in 1982, Komen has funded more than $956 million in research and provided more than $2.1 billion in funding to screening, education, treatment and psychosocial support programs. Komen has worked in more than 60 countries worldwide. Komen was founded by Nancy G. Brinker, who promised her sister, Susan G. Komen, that she would end the disease that claimed Suzy’s life. Visit komen.org or call 1-877 GO KOMEN. Connect with us on social at ww5.komen.org/social 4 Susan G. Komen 3-Day® 55 E. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1010 Chicago, IL 60604 800-996-3DAY The3Day.org PIT STOP DESCRIPTION Pit stops are support areas set up along each day’s route for the Susan G. Komen 3 -Day® participants. Each stop is operated by event volunteers and staff and is designed to give the walkers a place to rest, re-hydrate, refuel and take care of basic first aid needs. Generally, a pit stop will have two or three 16’ diameter free-standing (non-staked) octagonal tents which will serve water and sports drink, pre-packaged snacks and fresh cut fruit. The pit stop will also host a licensed medical team of volunteers to treat minor ailments. Portable toilets are also a part of a pit stop and are typically delivered the evening before use and picked up in the evening after the site has officially closed. Supplies (site supplies, equipment, water, snacks and ice) are dropped off the morning of the event and removed when the site is officially closed. Vehicles ranging from passenger cars, minivans, and a 16’ box truck will need access the site and will require on-site parking. Approximately three 12-person passenger van shuttles will need a designated area for the loading and unloading of participants. List of snacks to be provided: Bananas Clementines Grapes (pre-packaged) Chex Mix (pre-packaged) Cheez-Its (pre-packaged) Sun Chips (pre-packaged) Oreos (pre-packaged) PBJ graham sandwich (pre-packaged) Peanuts (pre-packaged) Potato chips (pre-packaged) Pretzels (pre-packaged) String cheese (pre-packaged) Danishes/Croissants (individually pre-packaged) – At Pit Stop 1 only if available 5 Ride With GPS · https://ridewithgps.com Map data ©2019 Google Bike Paths Report a map error 6 #The3Day The3Day.org ©2017 Susan G. Komen® WAYS YOU CAN SUPPORT THE 3-DAY: HOW TO GET INVOLVED Be Bold. Be Fearless. Be MORE THAN PINK®! A breast cancer diagnosis – whether it’s your own or someone you love – can leave you feeling helpless. Imagine if there was a way to fight back – to do something to make an impact. There is. It’s called the Susan G. Komen 3-Day®. The Facts: • It’s a 60-mile walk over the course of three days. • The route is fully supported by an experienced crew who will keep you safe and comfortable (and cheer you on like a rock star!). • For two nights, you’ll camp in the 3-Day community. (optional) • You’ll raise $2,300 to help end breast cancer. It’s a big commitment, but to end breast cancer, we must act boldly. It’s time to step up and do the most you can do – for the mission, for those you love and for yourself. Visit The3Day.org to learn more and to register. It Takes a Village! When the Komen 3-Day comes to town, the whole community rallies around it. There are many ways you can join and make an impact. Serve as a crew member, donate, volunteer your time, join a cheer station or organize a cheer squad. It’s three incredible days as part of a community dedicated to doing good. Don’t miss it! The Facts: • Serve as the walkers’ lifeline and backbone of the event as a 3-Day crew member. • Spend a few hours or a day bringing the Opening or Closing ceremonies to life as a volunteer. • Be the person who inspires our walkers to take one more step on the route in one of our Mobile Cheer Squads (what we affectionately call “walker stalkers”). • Join local business and community groups at a Cheering Station along the route. • Help end breast cancer with your donation. Donate now. Visit The3Day.org for more information. Together, We Do More! Without our sponsors, we’d never be able to do what we do – raise millions of dollars for research and breast cancer education, screening and treatment. Their generosity and tireless efforts allow us to continue striving to save lives and end breast cancer forever. The Facts: • Supporting the Komen 3-Day® enables your company to be affiliated with the leader in the breast cancer movement. • By partnering with Komen as a sponsor, your company can reach thousands of passionate Komen supporters. • A tremendous opportunity to build brand loyalty, attract new customers and showcase your commitment to supporting your community. • Customizable packages to best fit the needs/wants of your company. Please fill out the form at ww5.komen.org/Partner_Form to receive more information. 7 BECOME A COMMUNITY PARTNER FOR THE SUSAN G. KOMEN 3-DAY® What is the Susan G. Komen 3-Day? The Susan G. Komen 3-Day is a 60-mile walk for women and men who are ready to go the distance to end breast cancer. Participants raise a minimum of $2,300 and walk an average of 20 miles a day for three consecutive days. Over the past 16 years and 170 events, the Komen 3-Day has raised more than $848 million. The funds raised have helped Komen’s mission to save lives from breast cancer, by investing more than $956 million in breakthrough research and more than $2.1 billion to support people and communities most at risk through programs to provide access to screening, treatment assistance, patient navigation and education. What is a Community Partner? An ideal Community Partner is an organization invested in the community as well as the movement to end breast cancer. They are dedicated to helping spread the word about the 3-Day and providing their clients, customers and staff with the opportunity to support meaningful events like this one. Sponsored by Bank of America, the 2019 3-Day Series includes seven events in Michigan (August 2-4), Twin Cities (August 16-18), New England (September 6-8), Seattle (September 13-15), Philadelphia (October 18-20), Dallas/Fort Worth (November 1-3), and San Diego (November 15-17). What You’ll Gain • A unique marketing opportunity to reach a highly-engaged audience. • Opportunity for select Community Partners to activate onsite at your local 3-Day, reaching hundreds, or even thousands, of dedicated 3-Day participants, supporters, friends and family. • The potential to increase traffic to your place of business/website. • High-touch engagement opportunities with a coveted demographic: professional women aged 35+. Promotional Partner Responsibilities •Publicize the 3-Day to your house lists via email 1-2 times. •Publicize the 3-Day via social media 2-3 times. •Poster placement in-store, in a highly visible location, as applicable. Event Partner Responsibilities Each of the Promotional Partner responsibilities listed above, plus: •Work with the 3-Day Local Lead Coordinator to host one promotional event at your business. Join the fight. Partner with the Susan G. Komen 3-Day in one of or both of the following ways: 1. Community Partner – Promotional 2. Community Partner – Event THE SUSAN G. KOMEN 3-DAY® IS COMING TO YOUR COMMUNITY AND WE ARE LOOKING FOR LIKE-MINDED BUSINESSES, BRANDS AND ORGANIZATIONS TO JOIN US AS A COMMUNITY PARTNER. 8 ©2019 Susan G. Komen. PHOTO CREDIT: MICHAEL DER What You’ll Get: Benefits for Your Business • eCOMMUNICATIONS: Placement of a promotional offer in one existing email to participants (not a dedicated email), including a hyperlink to your website. • ONLINE PRESENCE: Mention(s) via local 3-Day social media. One mention for Promotional Partners; two mentions for Event Partners. • ON-EVENT EXPOSURE: Opportunity to activate at a dedicated location on the 3-Day route with sampling (staff and product to be provided by partner). This benefit is available for Event Partners only. What You’ll Get: Tools to Help Get the Word Out • Partner Toolkit: Posters, Templates, Photos, Logos. We provide everything you need to promote the 3-Day. 9 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 10 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 2 MARCH 26, 2019 3 4 CALL TO ORDER. 5 6 Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 8 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 9 10 Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 11 12 ROLL CALL. 13 14 Present: Mayor Faust, Councilmembers Gray, Jenson, Randle and Stille. 15 Absent: None 16 Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey, Finance Director Shelly Rueckert, Police Chief Jon 17 Mangseth, and GreenCorp Member Minette Saulog 18 19 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 20 ITEMS. 21 22 I. APPROVAL OF MARCH 26, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 23 24 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Randle, to approve the City 25 Council Meeting Agenda of March 26, 2019 as presented. 26 27 Motion carried 5-0. 28 29 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS – NONE. 30 31 III. CONSENT AGENDA.32 33 A.Approval of March 12, 2019 City Council Meeting Minutes.34 B.Licenses and Permits.35 C.Claims.36 D.Resolution 19-025; a Resolution to approve a request to keep four (4) female chickens in37 an R-1 zoning district at 3001 Silver Lake Road38 39 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the Consent 40 Agenda items. 41 42 Motion carried 5-0. 43 44 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS.45 46 A.2020 Budget Calendar47 48 Mayor Faust opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. 49 11 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 26, 2019 Page 2 1 Finance Director Shelly Rueckert reviewed the 2020 Budget Calendar and noted that this 2 evening’s meeting will include the Public Hearing and provide residents with an opportunity to 3 have input in the 2020 Budget Process. The PowerPoint presentation included a review of the 4 2019 General Fund Revenues and Expenditures as well as General Fund and Overall Levies. 5 6 Councilmember Stille explained to the public that this is a process that the City goes through 7 every year about this time that allows for a public forum in order to give input and feedback on 8 the City’s budget. 9 10 Mayor Faust closed the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. 11 12 B. Ordinance 2019-02; an Ordinance amending the Parks Commission Purpose, 13 Membership, Powers and Duties. 14 15 Mayor Faust opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. 16 17 City Manager Casey reviewed this is the first of three readings to the proposed changes to 18 Sections 32.20, 32.21 and 32.25 of the Parks Commission ordinance. At the December 3, 2018 19 Parks Commission meeting, the Parks Commission unanimously recommended changes to the 20 Parks Commission Purpose, Membership, Powers and Duties. At the January 22, 2019 City 21 Council meeting, the Parks Commission Chair presented these changes. At the March 4, 2019 22 City Council Work Session, staff presented recommended revisions and by consensus of the City 23 Council, staff was directed to bring the Ordinance for City Council approval. 24 25 City Manager Casey noted the proposed changes include changing the name from Parks 26 Commission to Parks and Environmental Commission, reducing the School District’s 27 membership from two representatives to one, updating the Ordinance to take into account the 28 School District #282 Student Liaison replacing the Sports Boosters representative, and including 29 “Environmental” under the Powers and Duties section where appropriate. 30 31 Mayor Faust closed the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. 32 33 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve first reading 34 of Ordinance No. 2019-02; An Ordinance Amending Sections 32.20, 32.21 and 32.25 Parks 35 Commission. 36 37 Motion carried 5-0. 38 39 C. Ordinance 2019-03; an Ordinance adding Chapter 98 Small Wireless Facilities. 40 41 Mayor Faust opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. 42 43 City Manager Casey stated this ordinance is for the creation of Chapter 98 Small Wireless 44 Facilities. In addition, proposed changes to Chapter 96 Right-of-Way Management and Chapter 45 33 License and Permit Fees to ensure all chapters coincide. He explained the next generation of 46 12 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 26, 2019 Page 3 wireless services (called 5G) will require wireless providers to install a large amount of lower 1 hanging antennas that are connected to fiber optic cable allowing wireless providers to provide 2 significantly higher internet speeds. The facilities needed to provide 5G service are called small 3 wireless facilities. 4 5 City Manager Casey provided a high-level summary of the small wireless facility ordinance. He 6 noted that items D and E on the agenda are also related to this and suggested talking about them 7 together but taking action separately. 8 9 Councilmember Gray stated his understanding that most of this is covered under State Statute 10 that was passed a few years ago. 11 12 City Manager Casey stated that was correct and was also overseen by Federal regulations. 13 14 Councilmember Gray confirmed that the goal of this then is to manage it the best way possible 15 within the City’s rules. 16 17 Councilmember Stille stated that he does not want the public to be surprised when this rolls out. 18 He noted there could be more antennas seen around town than there are currently. He stated that 19 the upside of more antennas is access to 5G service, but the downside is that in some cases, it 20 won’t just be an antenna and there will be a refrigerator-sized box at the base located within the 21 right-of-way. 22 23 City Manager Casey stated this was correct and noted that the size of the nodes that are not 24 attached will be disbursed throughout the City. He stated that there are still many “unknowns” 25 but the City does not have the authority to have the nodes buried so they will need to be above 26 ground. 27 28 Councilmember Stille explained this is in reaction to an FCC ruling and State law which means 29 the City cannot do anything about it. He asked when this would take effect. 30 31 City Manager Casey stated the FCC ruling takes effect beginning April 15, 2019. 32 33 Councilmember Stille noted that the third reading of the ordinance is scheduled for April 23, 34 2019 and asked about the possibility of waiving the third reading in order to meet the April 15, 35 2019 deadline. 36 37 City Manager Casey stated that staff’s recommendation is to waive the second reading and go 38 straight into the third reading for action because of that reason. 39 40 Councilmember Stille stated this is a very in-depth ordinance and confirmed that the City worked 41 in conjunction with the League of Minnesota Cities to draft the ordinance. 42 43 City Manager Casey stated the City did work with the League of Minnesota Cities as well as a 44 variety of resources that provided guidance. 45 46 13 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 26, 2019 Page 4 Councilmember Jenson noted inside this document, there is a section called “small wireless 1 aesthetic standards” and asked who drafted this section because it gives a pretty good description 2 of what can be controlled. 3 4 City Manager Casey stated that section was the culmination of a few sources and noted some of 5 it came from the City of Denver because they are a bit ahead of us on this issue. 6 7 Councilmember Jenson asked if this would be reasonably enforceable the way this is written. 8 9 City Manager Casey stated the City will try to mitigate any issues the best that they can. 10 11 Mayor Faust stated he appreciated that City Manager Casey had clarified the term “small 12 wireless facility” was in terms of the coverage area of the transmission and not the equipment. 13 He stated the City will try to mitigate it the best it can within the confines of the Federal and 14 State rulings. 15 16 Mayor Faust closed the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. 17 18 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve first reading of 19 Ordinance No. 2019-03; an Ordinance to Enact a New Chapter 98 of the Code of Ordinances 20 Relating to Small Wireless Facilities, Establishing General Standards, a Permitting Process, 21 General Permitting Conditions and Other Requirements. 22 23 Motion carried 5-0. 24 25 D. Ordinance 2019-04; an Ordinance amending Chapter 33 Establishment of Fee Amounts 26 to add Small Cell Fees. 27 28 Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Randle, to approve first reading 29 of Ordinance No. 2019-04; an Ordinance Amending Sections 33.061 Establishment of Fee 30 Amounts. 31 32 Motion carried 5-0. 33 34 E. Ordinance 2019-05; an Ordinance amending Chapter 96 Right of Way Management. 35 36 Motion by Councilmember Randle, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve first reading 37 of Ordinance No. 2019-05; an Ordinance Amending Multiple Sections of Chapter 96 Right of 38 Way Management. 39 40 Motion carried 5-0. 41 42 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF - NONE. 43 44 VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. 45 46 14 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 26, 2019 Page 5 A. Resolution 19-026; a Resolution Approving 3.2 On Sale Malt Liquor license for 1 National Grill located at 2201 St. Anthony Blvd. 2 3 City Manager Casey stated in front of Council this evening is a resolution to approve a 3.2 On 4 Sale License for National Grill located at 2201 St. Anthony Blvd. This is a new business that will 5 be providing food and beverage service at Gross Golf Course in the Clubhouse. Staff has 6 completed background checks on the new business owner and staff is recommending approving 7 the 3.2 On Sale License. 8 9 Councilmember Jenson asked if this was just a new supplier within Gross Golf Course replacing 10 the last supplier who already had a liquor license. 11 12 City Manager Casey stated that was correct and noted that liquor licenses are not transferrable. 13 14 Councilmember Randle asked why this is for a 3.2 license. 15 16 City Manager Casey explained with the way the City code is written, you cannot have a full 17 liquor license except for in the commercial district. 18 19 Wylie Wong, GC Ventures, 2201 St. Anthony Parkway, asked if the Council had any questions 20 for him. He indicated they do plan to apply for a code text amendment in order to allow full 21 liquor sales at a future date. 22 23 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Randle, to approve Resolution 24 19-026; a Resolution approving 3.2 On Sale Malt Liquor License for National Grill located at 25 2201 St. Anthony Blvd. 26 27 Motion carried 5-0. 28 29 B. St. Anthony Police Department Annual Report. 30 31 Police Chief Jon Mangseth presented to the City Council a high-level overview of the 2018 St. 32 Anthony Police Department Annual Report. Included in the presentation were Department 33 Summary, St. Anthony Part I Crimes, St. Anthony Part II Crimes, Calls for Service, Patrol 34 Review, Investigation Review, Education Summary, Police Reserves, Social Media, Community 35 Engagement, Body Worn Camera Program, Progress Report, What’s on Deck, and how residents 36 can Stay Connected. Chief Mangseth noted that the complete report can be viewed on the City 37 website at www.savmn.com and encouraged residents to sign up for push notifications and stay 38 connected to the Department. Chief Mangseth stated that the officers in the City have big 39 hearts and a service mindset and endeavor to serve to the best of their ability. 40 41 Councilmember Gray asked if the 2,237 hours of training for just for 2018. 42 43 Chief Mangseth confirmed those hours did reflect the training in just 2018. He gave some 44 examples of the types of training such as partner training with procedural justice and fair and 45 impartial policing. 46 15 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 26, 2019 Page 6 1 Councilmember Gray stated he believes the Department does a great job with community 2 engagement. He also appreciates the social media aspect to the Department communication 3 efforts. He reiterated that he feels the Department is doing an outstanding job. 4 5 Councilmember Stille stated he wanted to echo some of Councilmember Gray’s comments. He 6 feels the City must be doing something right when the media reports on the Department’s social 7 media efforts like KARE 11 did with the virtual ride along. He read aloud a portion of the 8 presentation that spoke to how all individuals, including the victim and suspect, were treated 9 with dignity and respect throughout their dealings with the Department. He felt it was important 10 to highlight this point and not simply touch on the statistics. 11 12 Councilmember Jenson stated there was a lot of information in the full report and he noticed all 13 of the officers and leadership team wrote articles about their initiatives. One theme he noticed 14 running through all of the articles was that they are all committed to their job to serve the 15 community. He encouraged anyone who may be watching the meeting to go on-line and read the 16 full report. 17 18 Councilmember Randle stated he wants to comment on things that he feels may be taken for 19 granted, such as being able to sit outside at night in peace and his son being able to walk up and 20 down the street to a friend’s house and be safe. He stated that he knows this is not the case 21 everywhere and expressed his appreciated to the Department. 22 23 Mayor Faust stated the City had the smallest department that went through the collaborative 24 reform, which he thinks speaks highly of the Department. He stated that he doesn’t view 25 turnover as all bad because when officers leave the City, they are bringing the training they 26 received here out to other areas, which he views as a positive. He stated that officers need to be 27 a combination of school teacher, psychologist, and healthcare professional which is amazing and 28 very difficult. He stated that he thinks the body worn cameras have been an asset to the 29 Department. He noted that much is asked of a few and the Department is the few. He thanked 30 the Department from the bottom of his heart as a resident and as the Mayor and thinks that the 31 Department has moved from a good Department, on the road to a great Department, over the last 32 2.5 years. 33 34 C. Resolution 19-027; a Resolution in support of the “Mayor’s Challenge for Water 35 Conservation” 36 37 GreenCorp Member Minette Saulog provided an overview of the 2019 Wyland National Mayor’s 38 Challenge for Water Conservation which is a friendly competition that promotes drought 39 resiliency and protection of water quality. Her presentation included information relating to 40 What is the Wyland Mayor’s Challenge, Why is This Important, Who Can Participate, and How 41 a Water Pledge Can Be Made. It was noted that residents are encouraged to take the pledge 42 between April 1-30, 2019 at www.mywaterpledge.com. She gave a brief explanation on how to 43 pledge and noted that there are three “St. Anthony’s” that show up as an option when searching 44 for your city, and asked that they make sure they select Minnesota. 45 46 16 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 26, 2019 Page 7 Mayor Faust stated that this challenge is a classic example of how everyone can pitch in. He 1 stated that the website even shows you how to properly load the dishwasher. He explained that 2 people can monitor their own water usage by going to the City website and signing up for “My 3 Water Usage.” 4 5 Motion by Mayor Faust, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to approve Resolution 19-027; a 6 Resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Anthony, State of Minnesota, in Support of the 7 “Mayor’s Challenge for Water Conservation.” 8 9 Motion carried 5-0. 10 11 D. GreenCorp Update. 12 13 GreenCorp Member Minette Saulog provided an update of the January – March 2019 GreenCorp 14 activities. Her presentation included CTV Quarterly Update Video, February Bill Clinics, 15 Quarter 2 MN GreenCorps Training, SolSmart Update, Community Solar Garden Update, Data 16 for US Solar’s Big Lake 1 Community Solar Garden, and Upcoming Events. She noted that 17 there are two upcoming workshops on April 25, 2019 on rain barrels and a presentation on home 18 energy that people can register for on-line. She stated that the Spring Clean Up Day is May 4, 19 2019 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. She stated that there will be an organics recycling 20 presentation on May 8, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 21 22 Councilmember Stille commended GreenCorp Member Saulog on her solar update and noted the 23 City approved it in 2016 and it has taken longer than expected to get it up and running. He stated 24 that it is a great program. 25 26 VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. 27 28 City Manager Casey reported that the organics recycling is collected weekly by Waste 29 Management at no charge to the City. He noted they had conducted an audit and found there 30 were 2,002 pounds of organics collected so it has been highly used and a highly successful 31 program. He noted road construction season is coming up soon and there will be a link to 32 MNDot’s page for specific information on the City website. He stated the owners of Lowry 33 Grove have submitted a permit for new water service to connect 42 mobile home units to City 34 service. 35 36 Councilmember Jenson reported that on March 14, 2019, he attended the Ramsey County Local 37 League of Government meeting and a legislative priority discussion. 38 39 Councilmember Stille reported he attended the Parks and Planning Commission presentation on 40 March 19, 2019 on the 2019 goals. 41 42 Councilmember Gray stated that he had no report. 43 44 Councilmember Randle reported on March 19, 2019, he attended the joint Parks and Planning 45 Commission and a work session meeting with CTV. He stated that on March 24, 2019, he 46 17 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 26, 2019 Page 8 attended a sister-city meeting and noted they are working to get a documentary out about the 1 City. 2 3 Mayor Faust reported that he attended the joint Parks and Planning Commission meeting and the 4 work session meeting with CTV on March 19, 2019. He also attended a Chamber of Commerce 5 meeting where the superintendent of schools spoke. 6 7 VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM – NONE.8 9 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS – NONE.10 11 X. ADJOURNMENT. 12 13 Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. 14 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 Kayla Rokosz 17 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 18 19 20 Mayor 21 ATTEST: 22 City Clerk 23 24 18 Saint Anthony Village DATE: April 9, 2019 Approved: TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: License Clerk ITEM: License and Permits for Approval: General Contractors Licenses: Garden City, Cottage Grove, MN Ideal Energies, Minneapolis, MN Mechanical License: Zahler Heating & AC, Jordan, MN Cigarette and Tobacco Sales License: Applicant: Speedway Location: 3259 Stinson Blvd NE Retail Fireworks License: Applicant: Cub Foods Garbage Hauler/Recycling License: Applicant: Advanced Disposal Service Service Station License: Applicant: Speedway Location: 3259 Stinson Blvd Parks Special Event Beer Permit: Date: June 15, 2019 Applicant: Louise Louiselle Location: Central Park 19 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 20 City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 3/26/2019 - 4/10/2019 Apr 04, 2019 01:25PM Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount 11729 WIRELESS WORLD 37643 03/26/2019 24.99 11239 POST BOARD 37644 03/29/2019 90.00 10710 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 37645 04/05/2019 2,006.00 11792 INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL #49 37646 04/05/2019 420.00 11793 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 37647 04/05/2019 867.00 10002 LOCAL UNION IAFF #3486 37648 04/05/2019 357.30 11813 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 37649 04/05/2019 32.00 1118 56 BREWING 37650 04/10/2019 416.00 10011 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 37651 04/10/2019 67.30 10037 AHO/JESSIE 37652 04/10/2019 125.00 10056 ALLIED MEDICAL PRODUCTS 37653 04/10/2019 105.00 10098 ARAMARK 37654 04/10/2019 248.60 1100 ARTISIAN BEER COMPANY 37655 04/10/2019 4,634.34 10114 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO 37656 04/10/2019 101.33 10115 ASPEN MILLS 37657 04/10/2019 164.95 10116 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC 37658 04/10/2019 165.12 11969 BARBARA SCHNEIDER FOUNDATION 37659 04/10/2019 1,350.00 10152 BAYCOM INC 37660 04/10/2019 22,568.00 10159 BEISSWENGER'S 37661 04/10/2019 69.74 1013 BELLBOY CORPORATION 37662 04/10/2019 6,013.96 1014 BELLBOY CORPORATION 37663 04/10/2019 140.55 1035 BERNICK'S BEVERAGE & VENDING 37664 04/10/2019 6,584.92 2009 BLACK STACK BREWING 37665 04/10/2019 1,194.00 10185 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 37666 04/10/2019 223.25 8544 BOURGET IMPORTS 37667 04/10/2019 325.25 1018 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER 37668 04/10/2019 28,313.09 1011 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 37669 04/10/2019 13,062.58 1009 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 37670 04/10/2019 3,680.64 2014 BROKEN CLOCK BREWING 37671 04/10/2019 180.00 12608 BY THE RAIN BARREL LLC 37672 04/10/2019 5,000.00 1017 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 37673 04/10/2019 23,189.17 12596 CINTAS 37674 04/10/2019 725.47 12150 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 37675 04/10/2019 5,709.76 10293 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 37676 04/10/2019 861.00 12303 CITY WIDE LOCK & SAFE, LLC 37677 04/10/2019 482.00 10306 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE INC 37678 04/10/2019 69.47 1010 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE COMPANY 37679 04/10/2019 1,159.60 10332 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLNG. INC 37680 04/10/2019 3,578.00 12561 CORE & MAIN LP 37681 04/10/2019 865.00 10351 CREATIVE PRODUCT 37682 04/10/2019 1,538.00 1042 CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE 37683 04/10/2019 200.40 10373 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 37684 04/10/2019 33.75 10375 DALCO 37685 04/10/2019 584.92 10393 DELL MARKETING LP 37686 04/10/2019 573.00 10402 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 37687 04/10/2019 435.30 10417 DISCOUNT STEEL, INC.37688 04/10/2019 41.99 11796 DO GOOD BIZ INC 37689 04/10/2019 381.54 10432 DORSEY & WHITNEY 37690 04/10/2019 14,718.98 10468 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC 37691 04/10/2019 771.28 10473 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 37692 04/10/2019 540.00 10474 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC 37693 04/10/2019 615.00 10501 FASTENAL COMPANY 37694 04/10/2019 65.64 10508 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 37695 04/10/2019 5.37 21 City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 3/26/2019 - 4/10/2019 Apr 04, 2019 01:25PM Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount 10526 FLEETPRIDE 37696 04/10/2019 31.86 10539 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 37697 04/10/2019 3.98 10573 GOODIN COMPANY 37698 04/10/2019 19.90 10578 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 37699 04/10/2019 59.40 10585 GRAINGER 37700 04/10/2019 76.94 1032 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.37701 04/10/2019 943.00 10588 GRAPHIC SPECIALTIES, INC.37702 04/10/2019 126.50 1021 GREAT LAKES COCA COLA 37703 04/10/2019 351.30 10607 HACH COMPANY 37704 04/10/2019 655.02 10624 HAWKINS, INC 37705 04/10/2019 2,360.92 2024 HEADFLYER BREWING 37706 04/10/2019 222.00 10636 HEDBACK, ARENDT & CARLSON PLLC 37707 04/10/2019 3,500.00 10657 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 37708 04/10/2019 59.39 10661 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 37709 04/10/2019 462.00 1019 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 37710 04/10/2019 11,093.43 2013 INBOUND BREWCO 37711 04/10/2019 784.80 1027 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 37712 04/10/2019 1,116.50 10733 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC.37713 04/10/2019 100.00 11754 INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC.37714 04/10/2019 604.00 12315 IRC RETAIL CENTERS SALO PARK 37715 04/10/2019 2,812.32 12313 IRC RETAIL CENTERS SLV LIQ 37716 04/10/2019 2,284.83 1016 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 37717 04/10/2019 36,451.10 1102 JOHNSON BROTHERS 37718 04/10/2019 2,700.49 1004 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.37719 04/10/2019 2,954.85 1005 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.37720 04/10/2019 7,633.95 1006 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.37721 04/10/2019 5,353.95 1044 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.37722 04/10/2019 14,884.88 10831 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 37723 04/10/2019 1,000.00 10851 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPER 37724 04/10/2019 195.53 10853 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 37725 04/10/2019 175.95 2010 LUPULIN BREWING 37726 04/10/2019 110.00 1022 M. AMUNDSON LLP 37727 04/10/2019 1,995.52 10879 MAILFINANCE 37728 04/10/2019 438.00 11985 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 37729 04/10/2019 13,374.73 10931 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL - WASTEWATER 37730 04/10/2019 61,979.61 10994 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 37731 04/10/2019 596.00 11965 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 37732 04/10/2019 415.00 11965 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 37733 04/10/2019 23.00 1051 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 37734 04/10/2019 5,038.00 11131 NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORPORATION.37735 04/10/2019 381.99 11137 NORTHEASTER NEWSPAPER 37736 04/10/2019 530.00 11185 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.37737 04/10/2019 725.00 1012 PAUSTIS & SONS 37738 04/10/2019 1,610.12 1001 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 37739 04/10/2019 1,524.47 1002 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 37740 04/10/2019 5,187.36 11215 PIONEER RIM AND WHEEL CO.37741 04/10/2019 27.26 12447 PMG 56 LLC MN SERIES 37742 04/10/2019 208.05 11246 PRAXAIR 37743 04/10/2019 40.85 2019 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 37744 04/10/2019 371.00 12311 PUCKETTS RECYCLING 37745 04/10/2019 40.00 12482 QUALITY SIGNS & ENGRAVING 37746 04/10/2019 29.00 1020 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 37747 04/10/2019 774.80 12346 SHRED IT 37748 04/10/2019 33.00 22 City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 3/26/2019 - 4/10/2019 Apr 04, 2019 01:25PM Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount 1024 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37749 04/10/2019 2,467.12 1008 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37750 04/10/2019 1,092.31 1026 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37751 04/10/2019 13,240.31 1036 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37752 04/10/2019 193.28 11452 ST ANTHONY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 37753 04/10/2019 220.00 11457 ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CENTER, LLC 37754 04/10/2019 2,216.19 11531 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 37755 04/10/2019 350.32 11566 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 37756 04/10/2019 145.00 11568 TITAN MACHINERY 37757 04/10/2019 1,206.89 12702 TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 37758 04/10/2019 909.60 11586 TRACY PRINTING 37759 04/10/2019 2,891.80 11819 TRUE NORTH ELECTRIC 37760 04/10/2019 1,601.90 11635 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIAL 37761 04/10/2019 217.35 11637 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 37762 04/10/2019 27.60 2023 VENN BREWING CO 37763 04/10/2019 175.50 11674 VERIZON WIRELESS 37764 04/10/2019 2,299.52 11681 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 37765 04/10/2019 112.44 11706 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 37766 04/10/2019 283.63 11933 WIMACTEL INC 37767 04/10/2019 50.00 1034 WINE COMPANY/THE 37768 04/10/2019 266.00 1038 WINE MERCHANTS INC 37769 04/10/2019 2,064.32 11731 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GRP, INC.37770 04/10/2019 346.31 11738 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.37771 04/10/2019 21,336.00 Grand Totals: 403,860.49 23 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 24 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-028 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANTS AND DONATIONS RECEIVED WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony is required to accept all grants and donations by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has received the following grants and donations in the 1st quarter of 2019: Ramsey County Mirror Lake Improvements 8,960.00 State Grant Fire Department Training 6,150.00 Ramsey County Safe & Sober 1st Qtr. 10,452.13 HSIP Balance 4,885.96 DNR Grant-Silver Lake Rd. Flooding 355,000.00 RCWS Cost Share Agreement-Silver Lake Rd. Flooding 50,000.00 BWSR Grant-Silver Lake Rd. Flooding (Water Quality) 90,000.00 MWMO-Industrial Park Flooding 250,000.00 MDH-Well Head protection grant 6,000.00 Ramsey County Cost Share Agreement-Silver Lake Rd. Flooding 7,500.00 Total $788,948.09 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village hereby accepts the grants and donations as received in the 1st quarter of 2019. Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST:___________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Review for Administration: _______________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 25 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 26 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Meeting Date: April 9, 2019 Resolution-Approval 3.2 Off Sale Malt Liquor License for Holiday, located at 3810 Silver Lake Road OVERVIEW: In front of you this evening is a resolution to approve a 3.2 Off Sale License for Holiday located at 3810 Silver Lake Road. The license in front of you this evening is for Holiday which will replace the existing Freedom. Holiday anticipates this change occurring sometime this spring. Staff has completed background checks on the new business owner and staff is recommending approving the 3.2 Off Sale License. 27 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-029 A RESOLUTION APPROVING 3.2 OFF SALE MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR HOLIDAY LOCATED AT 3810 SILVER LAKE ROAD WHEREAS, the applicant’s filed a completed application for a 3.2 Off Sale Malt Liquor License for 3810 Silver Lake Road on March 21, 2019; and WHEREAS, the new applicant, Holiday, will replace the current Freedom store and they anticipate opening this spring; and WHEREAS, Staff recommends approval of a 3.2 Off Sale Malt Liquor License for Holiday at 3810 Silver Lake Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village hereby approves a 3.2 Off Sale Malt Liquor License for Holiday at 3810 Silver Lake Road. Adopted this 9th day April, 2019. ____________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST:____________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: ____________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 28 MEMORANDUM  To: St. Anthony Village Mayor and City Council  Mark Casey, City Manager  From: Stephen Grittman, City Planner  Date: City Council Meeting – April 9, 2019   NAC Project No.  323.01 – 19.02  Request: Request for Variance to Front Yard Setback Requirement; Variance to  Side Yard Setback Requirement Facing a Public Street.  Property Address:  3401 Harding Street NE  Property PID: 06‐029‐23‐24‐0033  STAFF RECOMMENDATION  The applicant proposes to construct two additions to an existing home at the above noted  address.  The proposed additions to the one‐story rambler include living space and a front  porch to the west, facing Harding Street.  On this side, the existing house setback would be  reduced from approximately 30 feet to 22.3 feet.    A second living space addition is proposed, with an attached garage facing the south (34th  Avenue NE).   The 34th Avenue addition would result in a setback of 20 feet for the garage area,  and 23.4 feet for the living space addition.  The existing setback toward 34th Street is  approximately 38 feet for the house, and 13.7 feet for a detached garage.  The applicants  indicate the existing detached garage would be removed  In reviewing the proposal, both additions raise the need for variances, as follows:  A.Reduced setback from Harding Street NE, a variance of approximately 7.7 feet. B.Reduced setback from 34th Avenue NE, a variance of approximately 10 feet (changed from the original request of 14.6 feet). Variances from each of these standards are required to proceed with the project as planned.    At the Planning Commission meeting, the applicants agreed to amend the proposed garage  setback variance to 10 feet (a setback of 20 feet) a change that was accepted by the  Commission, and incorporated into their recommendation to the City Council.    In reviewing the proposed improvements against the ordinance requirements, staff  recommends approval of the Harding Street front yard setback encroachment as proposed.   With regard to the variance toward 34th Avenue, staff recommends approval of the 23.4 foot  29 April 9, 2019  Page 2  setback, with a recommendation that the attached garage be shifted on the plan to meet a  setback of at least 20 feet.  Staff has reviewed for height, use, other setbacks, and impervious surface; the request appears  to meet all other code requirements.  The proposed impervious surface is 27.18%, within the  allowance for up to 35% coverage.    GENERAL INFORMATION  Applicant:    Shannon and James Foreman  Owner:    Shannon and James Foreman  Location:    3401 Harding Street NE  Existing Land Use  Low‐Density Residential    Zoning:    R‐1 Single Family District    Surrounding Land  North:  Low‐Density Residential / Zoned: R‐1 Single Family District  Use / Zoning:    East:   Low‐Density Residential / Zoned: R‐1 Single Family District    South:  Low‐Density Residential / Zoned: R‐1 Single Family District   West:  Low‐Density Residential / Zoned: R‐1 Single Family District    Deadline for Agency  Application Complete Date:   2/19/2019  Action:  60 Days:       4/20/2019  Letter Sent:      No    120 Days:      6/19/2019    ANALYSIS  1. Background  The applicant is proposing to construct site modifications that will encroach into the front  and side setbacks, and exceed the maximum allowable impervious surface.  The parcel in  question is shown on the zoning map below, and is 60 feet in width and approximately  9,285 square feet in area.     30 April 9, 2019  Page 3      A.  Front Yard Setback Variance – Harding Street NE.  The home to the north of the  subject parcel is set back from Harding Street at 30.3 feet.  The required front yard  setback for the R‐1 District is 30 feet.  As noted above, the existing home on the  property is currently at approximately 30 feet, meeting the required setback.  The  applicants propose to construct living space and a front entry/porch that would  encroach 7.7 feet into the required front yard.      The zoning ordinance sets out a series of criteria for a request to qualify for variance  consideration.  Those criteria are found in §152.245, (C) Evidence of the Zoning  Chapter, and are included in this report for reference below.  The criteria can be  summarized as whether there are unique conditions on the property that contribute  to creation of a practical difficulty in putting the property to what would otherwise  be considered a reasonable use – reasonable use is often thought of as one that  would be common and acceptable in the area. Variances may not be entirely  economic in nature, nor be the result of the actions of the applicant.    In this case, the applicants suggest that there are conditions that meet the required  criteria.  First, there is a wide variety of street setback distances on Harding, and in  the surrounding neighborhoods.  On the subject property’s block, Harding Street  setbacks range from as little as 15 feet to more than 70 feet.  This reflects a history  of accommodating variability in the area.  Second, the applicants note that for  corner lots – even while they are seeking a variance to the south side, buildable area  is severely limited.  While there would be area to expand behind the home, any such  expansion would impact the amount of open rear yard space on the lot.    The applicants further suggest that the requested encroachment will permit them to  upgrade the look of the house from the street, retaining or enhancing neighborhood  character as a result.  The front elevation incorporates a combination of stone,  31 April 9, 2019  Page 4  shake, and lapped siding, and continues the single‐story rambler pattern common to  the area.    The proposed design does not appear to be out of character with the neighborhood.   For any variance, the underlying requirement must be that the proposed use of  property is reasonable, that is, a condition that most would presume to be a  common and expected use of property.  If so, the next test is whether unique  conditions exist on the property, and whether those conditions create “practical  difficulties” in using the property reasonably.    In this case, the expansion to the west (front) appears to be reasonable – it retains  and enhances the “curb appeal” of the property in the context of the neighborhood,  and is in character with other neighboring properties.  Adding the porch and living  space accommodate reinvestment in the property, an important goal of the City’s  comprehensive planning.  While a rear‐yard addition would accomplish the  reinvestment objective, it would not improve the neighborhood character.   Moreover, expansion to the north (toward the side property line) would be possible,  but would create a greater potential impact on the adjoining property.  As such, the  variance is supportable, even though there are alternative designs that would  accommodate building expansion.      As noted above, staff recommends approval of the variance for the front yard  encroachment for the proposed porch and living space as shown in the applicants’  application.    B. Side Yard Setback Variance – 34th Avenue NE.  The applicants propose to add living  space and an attached garage to the south of the existing home, removing an  existing detached garage to the rear of the property.  For corner lots such as this  one, the side yard setback requirement facing a street is increased from the  common 5 feet to 30 feet, equal to the front setback.      The applicants propose to construct living space and the attached garage within the  side yard facing 34th Avenue on the south side of the house.  The current setback is  approximately 38 feet from the property line.  The proposed expansion adds living  space to a setback of 23.4 feet, and further extends the garage an additional eight  feet, resulting in a 15.4 foot setback.  While detached garages are afforded greater  flexibility in setback restriction, attached garages are treated as a portion of the  principal building.  Therefore, the setback standard of 30 feet applies to the 34th  Avenue frontage.    At the Planning Commission meeting, the applicants agreed to amend the proposed  garage setback to 20 feet, a change that was accepted by the Commission, and  incorporated into their recommendation to the City Council.      32 April 9, 2019  Page 5  As with the discussion of the addition on the front, staff would agree that the living  space addition is appropriate in this location.  The addition maintains a 30 foot  distance from Harding Street, and is supported by the same rationale for the  encroachment toward 34th Avenue – reasonable use, neighborhood character, and  practical difficulties.  In this case, the corner lot setback requirements and the  common setback conditions along 34th Avenue (particularly the north side of the  street) support some level of encroachment.    Staff is concerned, however, with the placement of the proposed garage.  At 15.4  feet, a vehicle parked in the driveway would extend into the public right of way, a  problematic condition during snow plowing operations.  Moreover, the plan shows a  proposed 12.9% grade for the new driveway.  While the City does not establish a  specific maximum grade for driveways, this slope is only marginally functional.   Many communities limit driveway grades to 10% or even less.  Moreover, parking  and exiting a vehicle on a slope such as this can be difficult for some to negotiate.      For the garage portion of the project, staff would recommend that any setback  variance limit encroachment into the side yard to a point no less than 20 feet from  the property line.  This distance provides a sufficient parking stall depth without  encroaching into the right of way.  In this particular case, it would also have the  benefit of reducing the driveway slope by extending the distance.  The additional  driveway length would reduce the slope to less than 10% or so, a safer and more  manageable condition.     While the existing detached garage is closer to the property line than the proposed  attached garage, and this is not an uncommon condition along the street for such  garages, staff supports the greater setback to facilitate public safety, as well as  improved functionality on the property in question.    As such, staff recommends approval of the variance for a side yard setback  encroachment as shown on the proposed plans for the living space (to a distance of  23.4 feet from 34th Avenue), but recommends an amendment to the plan that  moves the garage farther into the lot to a 20 foot setback – a ten foot variance from  the 30 foot standard. The applicant should amend this aspect of the project on the  proposed construction plans for the site.    2. Representative Codes Referenced.  Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.039 (E) Front yard apply to this  proposal. City Code Section 152.039 (E) states the front yard must have a depth equal to the  greater of 30 feet or a distance equal to the average of the front yard depths of the two  adjacent lots.   Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.04 (F) Side yards. Each dwelling  must have 2 side yards, each having a width of at least 5 feet and having a combined width  of at least 15 feet. Any side yard adjacent to a street must be at least 30 feet in width  33 April 9, 2019  Page 6  Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.245 VARIANCES (A) Application  states that “An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply with  the zoning code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed to be constructed,  may apply for a variance upon payment of the fee specified in Chapter 33”.    3. Criteria for and Consistency with Criteria for Variance Approval. Title XV Land Usage,  Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.245, (C) Evidence, lists the criteria the City Council  must consider in determining whether to grant or deny a variance.    Request: Request for a 7.7‐foot variance (22.3 feet setback) from the required front yard  setback, and for a 6.6 foot to 10.0 foot variance (23.4 feet and 20.0 feet setbacks) from the  side yard setback facing a public street. The applicable criteria include:  1. The subject matter of the application is within the scope of this section.  2. Strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because:  a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not  permitted by the zoning code;  b. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property  not created by the property owner;  c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and  d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties.  3. The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the City’s comprehensive land use  plan.  4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the  zoning code.      SUMMARY AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION  Front Yard Setback Variance.  Staff recommends approval of the requested front yard setback  encroachment variance at 3401 Harding Street NE with the following conditions:  A. The front additions for porch and living space are constructed to a point no closer than  22.3 feet from the front property line, as shown on the plans dated 2/19/19.  B. The plans are modified to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for all other  aspects, including building setbacks and impervious surfaces, unless otherwise  approved by the City Council.    C. Any required permits for construction are applied for and approved by other relevant  staff.  This recommendation is based on a finding that the proposed addition is consistent with the  character of the neighborhood, and constitutes reasonable use of the property, overcoming  34 April 9, 2019  Page 7  practical difficulties related to alternatives that would raise issues of impact on adjoining  property, or minimize benefit to neighborhood character.  Side Yard Setback Encroachment Variance.  Staff recommends approval of the proposed side  yard setback encroachment toward 34th Avenue for the living space as designed and for  attached garage space of 5 feet, modified from the proposal shown on the plans dated 2/19/19,  subject to the following conditions:  A. The addition for living space is constructed to a point no closer than 23.4 feet from the  34th Avenue property line, as shown on the plans dated 2/19/19.  B. The addition for garage space is constructed to a point no closer than 20 feet from the  34th Avenue property line, rather than the 15.4 foot setback shown on the plans.  C. The plans are modified and shown to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for all  other aspects, including impervious surfaces, unless otherwise approved by the City  Council.    D. The existing detached garage is removed as proposed, no later than at the time of  occupancy for the proposed building additions.  E. Any required permits for construction are applied for and approved by other relevant  staff.  This recommendation is based on a finding that the request is consistent with commonly found  conditions in the neighborhood; that these conditions, combined with related corner lot  restrictions, create practical difficulties in putting the property to what would otherwise be a  reasonable use; and that by adopting the alternative garage setback, the property can be  developed with less variance and greater functionality.  ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS  Decision 1. Variance to Front Yard Setback  1. Motion to recommend approval of the request for a variance to the front yard setback  for construction of front porch and living space within the required 30 foot setback at  3401 Harding Street NE, and direct staff to prepare resolution declaring terms of the  same.  2. Motion to recommend denial of the variance as requested.  In the event of a  recommendation for denial, the Planning Commission must state its findings related to  denial.  3. Request Additional Information and Table Action, subject to the submission of  additional information from staff and/or applicant.     Decision 2. Variance to Side Yard Setback  35 April 9, 2019  Page 8  1. Motion to recommend approval of the request for a variance to the side yard setback  for construction of living space and attached garage within the required 30 foot setback  at 3401 Harding Street NE and direct staff to prepare resolution declaring terms of the  same.  2. Motion to recommend approval of the variance for living space, but modified for the  attached garage to a setback of 20 feet and direct staff to prepare resolution declaring  terms of the same.  3. Motion to recommend denial of the variance as requested.  In the event of a  recommendation for denial, the Planning Commission must state its findings related to  denial.  4. Request Additional Information and Table Action, subject to the submission of  additional information from staff and/or applicant.       ATTACHMENTS  Exhibit A:  Location map  Exhibit B:  Application and Supporting Material      36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 CITY COUNCIL APRIL 9, 2019 3401 HARDING STREET NE – Front and Side Yard Setback Variances 3401 HARDING STREET NE FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE; SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE 49 3401 HARDING STREET NE FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE; SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE Project Description: 2 Building Additions: Front: Harding Street (west); Living Space/Front Porch Side: 34th Avenue (south); Living Space/Attached Garage 3401 HARDING STREET NE FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE; SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE VARIANCE CRITERIA: Use is a reasonable one, given the character of the neighborhood Unique conditions exist on the property Those conditions create practical difficulties in putting the property to that reasonable use; and Conditions cannot be created by the owner; Conditions cannot be solely economic in nature. 50 3401 HARDING STREET NE PROPOSED SITE PLAN 3401 HARDING STREET NE PROPOSED SITE PLAN –FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE (TO HARDING ST.) Front Yard Setback Variance 22.3 feet –reduced from 30 feet required (7.7 foot variance) 51 3401 HARDING STREET NE PROPOSED SITE PLAN –SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE (TO 34TH AVE.) Side Yard Setback Variance 23.4 feet to living space –reduced from 30’ 20.0 feet to garage –reduced from 30’ (6.6’ –10.0’ variance) 3401 HARDING STREET NE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Harding Street NE (Front Setback Variance) Staff recommends approval of the requested front yard setback encroachment variance at 3401 Harding Street NE with the following conditions: A.The front additions for porch and living space are constructed to a point no closer than 22.3 feet from the front property line, as shown on the plans dated 2/19/19. B.The plans are modified to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for all other aspects, including building setbacks and impervious surfaces, unless otherwise approved by the City Council. C.Any required permits for construction are applied for and approved by other relevant staff. 52 3401 HARDING STREET NE STAFF/PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS 2.34th Avenue NE (Side Yard Setback Variance) Staff recommends approval of the proposed side yard setback encroachment toward 34th Avenue for the living space as designed; and an attached garage space of 20 feet setback, modified from the proposal of 15.4 feet as shown on the plans dated 2/19/19, subject to the following conditions: A.The addition for living space is constructed to a point no closer than 23.4 feet from the 34th Avenue property line, as shown on the plans dated 2/19/19. B.The addition for garage space is constructed to a point no closer than 20 feet from the 34th Avenue property line, rather than the 15.4 foot setback shown on the plans. C.The plans are modified and shown to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for all other aspects, including impervious surfaces, unless otherwise approved by the City Council. D.The existing detached garage is removed as proposed, no later than at the time of occupancy for the proposed building additions. E.Any required permits for construction are applied for and approved by other relevant staff. 53           NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING    Notice is hereby given that on March 19, 2019, 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, the Saint  Anthony Village Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to solicit public response to a request for  a 7.7 foot variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback to allow for an addition to the master  bedroom and a front porch, and consider a request for a 14.6 foot variance from the required 30 foot  side yard setback to allow for an attached garage at 3401 Harding Street.  The Planning Commission will make a recommendation regarding the proposed request to the City  Council for their meeting to be held on April 9, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall.  Those persons having an interest in said meetings are encouraged to attend. Oral testimony will be  accepted on the above subject at this meeting.  Written comments may be taken at the St. Anthony  Village City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony Village, Minnesota 55418 until the date of the  hearing.  Questions may be directed to the City Planner at 763‐957‐1100.  The Planning Commission agenda and packet item relating to this application will be made available  prior to the meeting online at www.savmn.com .  Steve Grittman  City Planner    54 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-030 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A 7.7 FOOT VARIANCE (SETBACK OF 22.3 FEET) FROM THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD TOWARD HARDING STREET NE, AND A SETBACK VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD OF 6.6 FEET (23.4 FOOT SETBACK) TO LIVING SPACE AND 10 FEET (20 FOOT SETBACK) TO GARAGE SPACE, AT 3401 34TH AVENUE NE WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village received a request from Shannon and James Foreman for variances from the required front and side yard setbacks to allow for placement of additions for living space, covered porch, and attached garage at 3401 Harding Street NE, legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block 3, Belden Ro (Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential district and the applicable front yard setback is 30 feet for the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the applicable side yard setback in said district is 30 feet; and WHEREAS, Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code Section §152.245 provides that City Council must provide evidence that the subject matter of the application is within the scope of the section and that strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested variances from both front and side yard setback dimension requirements to accommodate a proposed porch, living space addition; and attached garage; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 19, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in support of the resolution for approval: 1. The property is located in an area of varying setbacks from the street, both front and side. 2. The proposed improvements to the property are consistent with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located. 3. The setbacks required by the ordinance for corner lots inhibit the reasonable expansion of the property in questions. 4. With the modification to the garage setback as recommended by the Planning Commission, the proposed improvements constitute a reasonable use of the property. 55 5.Due to the conditions found on the property, there are practical difficulties in complying with the strict terms of the ordinance. 6.The proposed variances will accommodate reasonable use without negative impacts on neighboring property nor on public improvements and services. NOW THEREFORE MAY IT BE RESOVLED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village accepts the findings and recommendations documented in the staff report and approves variances to the required front and side setback requirements as shown on the plans dated 2/19/19 and modified as follows, at 3401 Harding Street NE: a.7.7 feet (22.3 foot setback) to the front (Harding Street) b.6.6 feet (23.4 foot setback) to living space on the side (34th Avenue) c.10.0 feet (20 foot setback) to attached garage space on the side (34th Avenue) Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 56 K:\011648-000\Admin\Resolutions\LTR-hmcc-032919.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COMMarch 29, 2019 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff c/o Mark Casey, City Manager City of St. Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake Road NE St. Anthony, MN 55418 Re: 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvement Projects Amended Feasibility Report St. Anthony Village, MN WSB Project No. R-011648-000 Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff: At the September 11, 2018, City Council meeting, Council accepted the Feasibility Report for the 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvements (Resolution 18-062). Following acceptance of the Feasibility Report, staff continued to investigate the improvements proposed to be completed during the 2020 construction season. At the direction of Council at the March 4, 2019, Council Work Session, staff amended the previously approved Feasibility Report to address changes relating to project scope, phasing and cost. The amended Feasibility Report recommends the following street and utility improvements to be constructed in 2020: Street and Utility Reconstruction •32nd Avenue NE from Rankin Road to Croft Drive •Croft Drive from 32nd Avenue NE to 31st Avenue NE •Silver Lake Terrace from Silver Lane to the north cul-de-sac Bituminous Mill and Overlay Improvements •Silver Lane from Stinson Boulevard to Silver Lake Road Based on the above recommendation, the total amended estimated project cost for the 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project is approximately $2,446,200, with the City of St. Anthony Village responsible for approximately $1,971,480. I am available to answer your questions at your April 9, 2019, Council meeting or you may call me at 651.286.8465. Sincerely, W SB Justin Messner, PE Assistant City Engineer 57 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 58 FEASIBILITY REPORT 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT and 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT APRIL 9, 2019 Prepared for: City of St. Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 59 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 FEASIBILITY REPORT 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE, MINNESOTA September 11, 2018 Prepared By: 60 CERTIFICATION 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Justin G. Messner, PE Date: September 11, 2018 Lic. No. 45857 Quality Assurance / Quality Control: Todd E. Hubmer, PE Date: September 11, 2018 Lic. No. 24043 61 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 TITLE SHEET CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 2.1 Authorization ..........................................................................................................2 2.2 Scope ......................................................................................................................2 2.3 Data Available........................................................................................................2 2.4 Project Location .....................................................................................................2 2.5 Project History .......................................................................................................3 3. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .....................................................................................4 3.1 Silver Lake Road Flood Mitigation Improvements ...........................................4 3.2 County Road C (29th Avenue NE) Improvements ............................................4 3.3 Silver Lake Road and 33rd Avenue NE Intersection Signal Improvements .6 3.4 Alternate Improvements .......................................................................................6 3.5 Permits and Approvals .........................................................................................7 4. FINANCING .......................................................................................................................8 4.1 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost .............................................................8 4.2 Funding Sources ...................................................................................................9 5. PROJECT SCHEDULE ..................................................................................................11 6. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION ..................................................................12 APPENDICES Appendix A – Figures Appendix B – Cost Tables Appendix C – Proposed County Road C (29th Avenue NE) Improvements 62 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 1 1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Infrastructure improvements proposed to be completed in 2019 include: Flood improvements on Silver Lake Road from approximately 250 feet south of Silver Lane to approximately 600 feet north of Silver Lane. Cooperative project with Ramsey County, Rice Creek Watershed Management Organization and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. County Road C Improvements - cooperative project with Ramsey County, Hennepin County and Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. Bituminous trail improvements Concrete sidewalk improvements Watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer improvements Industrial Park drainage and flood improvements Flashing Yellow Left Turn Signal improvements at the intersection of Silver Lake Road and 33rd Avenue NE Alternate improvements for City Council consideration in either 2019 or 2020 include the following: County Road C Improvements - cooperative project with Ramsey County and Hennepin County Bituminous trail extension through the cemetery from County Road C (29th Avenue NE) to the south existing bituminous trail Highway 88 turn lane improvements Bituminous mill and overlay improvements along the following streets: Silver Lane from Stinson Boulevard to Silver Lake Road Silver Lake Terrace from Silver Lane to the north cul-de-sac A map illustrating the project location can be found on Figure 1 of Appendix A. The total estimated project cost for the 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project is approximately $2,106,800 for the improvements proposed and approximately $1,260,800 for the alternate improvements identified. Funding for the project may come from the City’s Street and Utility Reconstruction Funds (Public Improvement Bonds), tax abatement funds, Ramsey County cost participation, Hennepin County cost participation, Mississippi Water Management Organization (MWMO) cost participation, Rice Creek Watershed (RCWD) cost participation, and Department of Natural Resources (DNR) grant. The project reconstruction can be completed, including all restoration items, in 2019. This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint and should be constructed as proposed herein. 63 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 2 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization On May 22, 2018 the St. Anthony Village City Council authorized the preparation of an engineering Feasibility Report for the 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project. This project was authorized under City of St. Anthony Village Resolution 18-045. 2.2 Scope Infrastructure improvements proposed to be completed in 2019 include: Flood improvements on Silver Lake Road from approximately 250 feet south of Silver Lane to approximately 600 feet north of Silver Lane. Cooperative project with Ramsey County, Rice Creek Watershed Management Organization and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. County Road C Improvements - cooperative project with Ramsey County, Hennepin County and Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. Bituminous trail improvements Concrete sidewalk improvements Watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer improvements Industrial Park drainage and flood improvements Flashing Yellow Left Turn Signal improvements at the intersection of Silver Lake Road and 33rd Avenue NE Alternate improvements for City Council consideration in either 2019 or 2020 include the following: County Road C Improvements - cooperative project with Ramsey County and Hennepin County Bituminous trail extension through the cemetery from County Road C (29th Avenue NE) to the south existing bituminous trail Highway 88 turn lane improvements Bituminous mill and overlay improvements along the following streets: Silver Lane from Stinson Boulevard to Silver Lake Road Silver Lake Terrace from Silver Lane to the north cul-de-sac 2.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: City of St. Anthony Village Record Drawings City of St. Anthony Village Topographic Maps Subsurface Exploration Field observations of area 2.4 Project Location The project is in various locations throughout the City of St. Anthony Village. The project area is identified on Figure 1 in Appendix A of this report. 64 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 3 2.5 Project History Recently, City Staff met with the Ramsey County engineers to discuss the County’s Transportation Improvement Plan; more specifically improvements programmed for the 2019 construction season. Ramsey and Hennepin Counties are proposing to reconstruct County Road C (29th Avenue NE) from Highway 88 to Interstate 35W in 2019. Improvements proposed for the project include the extension of trail/sidewalk and drainage improvements. As the City of St. Anthony Village has been asked to participate in funding for the improvements, it has provided an opportunity for staff to review the existing City owned infrastructure along the roadway and flooding concerns with the City of St. Anthony Industrial Park. Additionally, Ramsey County is planning to resurface Silver Lake Road from 37th Avenue NE to Interstate 694. City Staff has been working to correct flooding concerns along Silver Lake Road between 39th Avenue NE to Silver Lane. Addressing these flooding concerns as well as scheduling mill and overlay improvements along Silver Lane and Siler Lake Terrace to coincide with the improvements proposed along Silver Lake Road provide an opportunity to make the drainage and surface improvements without disrupting the newly resurfaced Silver Lake Road. City Staff has also identified the need to address traffic backups at the intersection of Silver Lake Road and 33rd Avenue NE for left turning movements from Silver Lake Road. The intersection currently allows for designated right, thru, and left turn lanes with red and green arrows directing left turning movements. The signal continues to allow right and thru traffic through the intersection when the left turn arrow turns red which has created backups within the left turn lanes. As a result, On May 22, 2018, the St. Anthony Village City Council authorized the preparation of an engineering feasibility report for the 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project. 65 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 4 3. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 3.1 Silver Lake Road Flood Mitigation Improvements The existing 60-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) trunk storm sewer along the west side of Silver Lake Road does not provide the necessary capacity to accommodate the current drainage. In addition, the existing low point, located approximately 250 feet south of Silver Lane, is also undersized, resulting in flooding of properties along the east side of the roadway during common (7-year) rain events. The existing storm sewer system will be improved with the addition of a new 36-inch RCP sewer main and catch basins along the roadway to better accommodate area drainage. The 36-inch RCP sewer main will extend from the existing low point located approximately 250 feet south of Silver Lane to approximately 600 feet north of Silver Lane and outlet to Silver Lake. The installation of the new sewer main will supplement the existing 60-inch sewer main to the west. To address the flooding along the east side of the roadway, it was identified to be more cost effective to install a secondary main along the roadway. The installation of the additional storm sewer main will not only alleviate existing flooding along the east side of Silver Lake Road, but also reduce flooding downstream to roadways with previous drainage concerns (Penrod Lane, Silver Lane, Fordham Drive, Shamrock Drive, 39th Avenue, and Foss Road). A map illustrating the proposed improvements can be found on Figure 2 of Appendix A. 3.2 County Road C (29th Avenue NE) Improvements Ramsey County and Hennepin County are proposing to reconstruct County Road C (29th Avenue NE) from Highway 88 to Interstate 35W in 2019. Improvements proposed along County Road C (29th Avenue NE) include reconstructing the existing roadway (including removal and replacement of the existing pavement, curb and gutter, and excavation of the underlying base materials), installation of a 10-foot bituminous trail along the south side of the roadway, installation of a 6-foot concrete sidewalk along the north side of the roadway, and drainage improvements. Additional improvements include the installation of a pond within the industrial park area to alleviate existing flooding concerns. Although the project is being designed and bid by Hennepin County and Ramsey County, the City of St. Anthony Village has been asked to participate in funding the trail, sidewalk, and drainage improvements. The proposed improvements along County Road C (29th Avenue NE) from Highway 88 to Long Lake Road can be found in Appendix C. Bituminous Trail and Sidewalk Improvements A 10-foot-wide bituminous trail and 6-foot-wide concrete walk is anticipated along County Road C (29th Avenue NE) from Highway 88 to Interstate 35W. The trail and sidewalk improvements improve pedestrian and vehicle safety by providing an off-street access route for pedestrians. As the installation of the trail and sidewalk provides direct benefit to St. Anthony Village residents, the City will be required to provide funding for 50% of the improvement cost for the bituminous trail and 75% of the improvement cost for the concrete sidewalk. Additionally, the removal and replacement of the concrete curb and gutter to facilitate the trail and sidewalk construction will require 50% cost participation. A map illustrating the proposed trail and sidewalk improvements can be found on Figure 3 of Appendix A. 66 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 5 Drainage Improvements Reconstruction of the roadway provides the City an opportunity to review and assess the condition of the existing infrastructure. Existing utilities located along County Road C (29th Avenue NE) include 9-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sanitary sewer main along the north side of the roadway, 6-inch cast iron pipe (CIP) watermain along the north side of the roadway, 12-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) trunk watermain along the south side of the roadway, and 12-inch to 36- inch RCP storm sewer main along the south side of the roadway. The existing storm sewer will be reconstructed to address drainage concerns and localized ponding/flooding. The cost participation for the drainage improvements is calculated based on the contributing drainage areas, estimated to be 75% City. The existing drainage was also reviewed within the industrial park, located south of County Road C (29th Avenue NE). Currently, various buildings within the industrial park experience flooding during common rain events (2-year). The existing roof drainage and limited adjacent storm sewer does not provide adequate storm conveyance and storage from the industrial park. A filtration system was constructed in 2017, located on the eastbound sided of County Road C (29th Avenue NE), just east of the Municipal/County boundary. The outlet control structure on this filtration system is not preforming as designed. This filtration system is discharging water southwest between buildings, onto Anthony Lane S, before making its way to the flood pond. Improvements proposed to alleviate the flooding concerns within the industrial park include reconstructing the existing outlet control structure of the filtration system to discharge west down the County Road C (29th Avenue NE) ditch. Drainage patterns would remain and prevent stormwater from flowing between buildings and over Anthony Lane S. Additionally, expansion of the existing flood pond located between the cemetery and the industrial park will provide additional stormwater storage and prevent flooding of the industrial are during larger rain events (100-year). A map illustrating the proposed storm sewer improvements along County Road C (29th Avenue NE) can be found on Figure 4 of Appendix A. A map illustrating the available right-of-way adjacent to the industrial park and the location of the drainage and flooding improvements can be found on Figure 6 of Appendix A. Municipal Utility Improvements Existing 6-inch CIP is proposed to be replaced with 8-inch DIP, including the replacement of water services up to and including the curb stop. Services will be replaced with 1-inch to 1.5-inch copper service pipe and curb stops brought to the right-of-way. All existing water main in the project area will be equipped with new valves and hydrants as necessary for proper operation and fire protection. The cost participation for the watermain improvements will 100% funded by the City. The existing VCP sanitary sewer will be reconstructed with 8-inch polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipe, including the replacement of sanitary sewer services. All services are proposed to be replaced with 6-inch PVC service pipe from the sewer main to the right-of-way. Replacing aging trunk utility facilities at the same time as the road construction is a proactive means by which to mitigate future maintenance costs. The cost participation for the sanitary sewer improvements will 100% funded by the City. A map illustrating the proposed utility improvements can be found on Figure 4 of Appendix A. 67 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 6 3.3 Silver Lake Road and 33rd Avenue NE Intersection Signal Improvements Currently, traffic experiences periodic backups for traffic make left turning movements (both east and west bound traffic) from Silver Lake Road at 33rd Avenue NE. Most the backups are experienced during the “rush hour” periods (approximately 7:00 am to 9:00 am and 3:00 pm to 6:00 pm). Improvements proposed to alleviate these backups are to install a flashing yellow turn signal to allow traffic to make a left turn as traffic allows. 3.4 Alternate Improvements Bituminous Trail Improvements (Cemetery) A 10-foot-wide bituminous trail is proposed from County Road C (29th Avenue NE) between the cemetery and the industrial park to the south where an existing bituminous trail exists. Extension of the bituminous trail would provide a much-needed bike connection between the bicycle-friendly roads north of the intersection of CSAH 88 and County Road C and the Minneapolis Diagonal Trial. The City will be required to provide funding for 100% of the improvement cost for the bituminous trail. A map illustrating the regional connection the trail through the cemetary would create can be found on Figure 7 of Appendix A. Highway 88 Turn Lane Improvements There is currently a free-right-turn from Highway 88 (50 mph speed limit) onto County Road C (29th Avenue NE) (45 mph speed limit). As traffic exits Highway 88 onto County Road C (29th Avenue NE) using the free-right-turn they quickly approach the intersection of Count Road C (29th Avenue NE) and Anthony Lane. Vehicles coming off the free-right-turn looking to turn left on Anthony Lane have approximately 260 feet to cross a lane of traffic, enter a left turn lane, and reduce their speed from 50 mph to a safe tuning speed, creating pedestrian and vehicle safety concerns. The City has directed staff to investigate two options for improvements to the free-right-turn from Highway 88 onto County Road C (29th Avenue NE) to review budget impacts to the City’s overall Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): Option 1: Remove the existing free-right-turn and make signal improvements to the Highway 88 and County Road C (29th Avenue NE) signal system to allow vehicles to make a right turn at the signalized intersection. This option will require vehicles to slow down prior to entering County Road C (29th Avenue NE) increasing vehicle and pedestrian safety. For the improvements to be considered in Option 1, funding is anticipated to be 100% County participation. Option 2: Leave the free-right-turn as it exists today and install the necessary pedestrian improvements to allow pedestrian to safely cross the free-right-turn, including pedestrian crosswalks and signage. Option 2 improvements will be considered if County funding is not available for Option 1. A map illustrating the proposed turn lane improvements can be found on Figure 5 of Appendix A. 68 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 7 Bituminous Mill and Overlay Improvements Improvements along Silver Lane and Silver Lake Terrace include milling down the existing bituminous pavement 1 3/4-inches along the full width of the roadway. A new 1 3/4-inches wear course will then be paved over the entire street extending the pavement life of the roadway until the road can be reconstructing in the future. New concrete curb and gutter along Silver Lake Terrace will also be installed to improve drainage and protect the edge of the existing roadway until the road can be reconstructed in the future. Additional improvements include removing and replacing a block retaining wall located at the northwest end of the cul-de-sac on Silver Lake Terrace. The existing 8-foot retaining wall is beginning to lean away from the roadway causing separation in the adjacent driveway. The retaining wall is proposed to be removed and a new large block wall installed. A map illustrating the mill and overlay improvements can be found on Figure 8 of Appendix A. The typical sections for the proposed mill an overlay improvements can be found on Figure 9 of Appendix A. 3.5 Permits and Approvals Reconstruction of the roadways will disturb over one acre and will require a National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) General Storm Water Permit (MNR 100001) that must be obtained by the City of St. Anthony Village from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The reconstruction of the existing water main will require a permit from the Minnesota Department of Health. The construction will also require a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and coordination with the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO). This may require stormwater treatment for the runoff from the project area. 69 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 8 4. FINANCING 4.1 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost A detailed breakdown of the Cost Opinion for the proposed project is included in Appendix B. The opinion of cost incorporates the construction costs experienced during 2016, 2017 and 2018, and includes a 10% contingency factor. Administrative costs are projected at 25% of the construction cost and include engineering, legal, financing, and other administrative costs. A summary of the project costs is as follows: Total Cost $717,000 $199,500 $179,300 $121,800 $235,000 $310,500 $300,000 $43,700 $2,106,800 Total Cost $175,500 $353,700 $731,600 $1,260,800 Bituminous Trail Improvements Concrete Sidewalk Improvements From City Limits to County Road 88 (north side of County Road C) Sanitary Sewer Improvements Watermain Improvements Drainage Improvements From City Limits to County Road 88 (south side of County Road C) Industrial Park Pond Improvements Public Utilities Mill and Overlay Improvements Total Alternate Improvements 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS City of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota Opinion of Probable Cost Total County Road C Improvements Proposed Improvements Total Silver Lake Road Flood Mitigation Improvements Silver Lake Road and 33rd Avenue NE Signal Improvements Total Proposed Improvements Alternate Improvements Total County Road C Improvements Bituminous Trail Improvements From County Road C to south of Cemetery Turn Lane Improvements CSAH 88 Free-Right-Turn Lane Removal 70 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 9 4.2Funding Sources The total project cost is projected to be approximately $2,106,800 for the improvements proposed and approximately $1,260,800 for the alternate improvements identified. Funding for the project may come from the City’s Street and Utility Reconstruction Funds (Public Improvement Bonds), tax abatement funds, Ramsey County cost participation, Hennepin County cost participation, Mississippi Water Management Organization (MWMO) cost participation, Rice Creek Watershed (RCWD) cost participation, and Department of Natural Resources (DNR) grant. The funding breakdown can be found on the following page. 71 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 10Special AssessmentsCity Costs DNR Grant Ramsey County Hennepin County RCWD MWMOTotal$0$217,000 $350,000 $100,000$0$50,000$0$717,000$0$99,750$0$0$99,750$0$0$199,500$0$120,244$0$0$59,056$0$0$179,300$0$121,800$0$0$0$0$0$121,800$4,675 $230,325$0$0$0$0$0$235,000$0$232,875$0$0$77,625$0$0$310,500Pond ImprovementsIndustrial Park $0$50,000$0$0$0$0$250,000 $300,000$0$43,700$0$0$0$0$0$43,700$4,675 $1,115,694 $350,000 $100,000 $236,431 $50,000 $250,000 $2,106,800Special AssessmentsCity Costs DNR Grant Ramsey County Hennepin County RCWD MWMOTotal$0$175,500$0$0$0$0$0$175,500$0$0$0$0$353,700$0$0$353,700$0$731,600$0$0$0$0$0$731,600$0$907,100$0$0$353,700$0$0$1,260,800Total Proposed ImprovementsOpinion of Probable Cost and Project FundingBituminous Trail ImprovementsFrom City Limits to County Road 88 (south side of County Road C)Mill and Overlay ImprovementsTotal Alternate ImprovementsAlternate ImprovementsTotal County Road C ImprovementsFrom County Road C to south of CemeteryProposed ImprovementsTurn Lane ImprovementsCSAH 88 Free-Right-Turn Lane RemovalSilver Lake Road and 33rd Avenue NE Signal ImprovementsConcrete Sidewalk ImprovementsFrom City Limits to County Road 88 (north side of County Road C)Bituminous Trail ImprovementsTotal County Road C ImprovementsCity of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTSDrainage ImprovementsPublic UtilitiesSanitary Sewer ImprovementsWatermain ImprovementsTotal Silver Lake Road Flood Mitigation Improvements72 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 11 5. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule for this improvement is as follows: Task Completion Date 1. Order Feasibility Report.......................................................................................May 22, 2018 2. Accept Feasibility Report and order plans and specifications...................September 11, 2018 3. Hold first public information meeting................................................................November 2018 4. Approve plans/specifications, and order Ad for Bid .........................................November 2018 5. Receive bids ........................................................................................................January 2019 6. Approve resolutions on improvement ..................................................................January 2019 7. Hold second public information meeting ............................................................February 2019 8. Public hearing for project, assessments, award bid, call bond sale...................February 2019 9. Award sale of bonds ...............................................................................................March 2019 10. Begin construction.............................................................................................May/June 2019 11. Certify assessments to a county auditor................................................................August 2019 12. Substantial completion of construction............................................................September 2019 13. Final completion of construction ...............................................................................June 2020 The proposed schedule is estimated and contingent on the schedule to be provided by Hennepin County and Ramsey County 73 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 12 6. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION Project costs are anticipated to be approximately $2,106,800 for the improvements proposed and approximately $1,260,800 for the alternate improvements identified. Based on our analysis and data presented, the proposed project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint. We recommend the improvements as detailed in this report. 74 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 APPENDIX A FIGURES 75 %&d( GâWX %&d( GâWX Signal Improvements33rd Ave & Silver Lake Rd HartLake LabelleParkPond FrancisGross GolfCourse Pond SilverLake Midland HillsCC Ponds LakeJones PoplarLake Silverwood Lowry Av e NE Silver Lake Rd3 7th Ave NE 2 9 t h Ave NE NewBrightonBlvdStinson Blvd NEKenzie TerMNTH988ACounty Road D CSAH 15 County Road BSaintCroixStCounty Road CCSAH 88OldHwy8SWMNTH 280SilverLakeRdNEISTH35WTe r m i n a l RdM N T H 36 4 0th Ave NE 45th Ave NE 4 4 th A v e N E CentralAveNEReservoirBlvdNEArthurStNEMill and Overlay Improvements Pond Improvements Flood and Drainage Improvements County Road C Improvements City Boundary 0 2,000Feet¯Figure 1 - Location Map 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Figure1_LocationMap.mxd Date Saved: 8/10/2018 2:34:14 PM1 inch = 2,000 feet WSB Project #: 01164-000 76 """"""""") ")") ")") ") !(!( !( """" "" & ^ & New 36" RCP Trunk Storm Existing 66" RCP Trunk Storm Main 36" RCPSILVER LNPENROD LNSILVER LAKE RDMACALASTER DRSILVER LAKE CTSILVER LAKE RD"Proposed CB ^Headwall &Proposed MH Proposed Storm !(ExistingManholes ")ExistingCatchbasin "Existing Gravity Mains ¯Figure 2 - Silver Lake Road Flood and Drainage Improvements 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\Figure1_SilverLkRd_Storm_Proposed.mxd Date Saved: 8/13/2018 1:54:08 PM1 inch = 200 feet WSB Project #: 011648-000 200 Feet 77 29TH AVE N E HIGHWAY NO 88ANTHONY LA SOLD HWY 8ANTHONY LARANKIN RD1 inch = 200 feet WSB Project #: 01164-000 6' Concrete Sidewalk Improvements 10' Bituminous Trail Improvements Figure 3 - County Road C (29th Ave NE) Pedestrian Improvements 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN 300 Feet 78 """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""!(!(!(!(!( G!5 !( !(!(") ")") ")") ")") ") !(!( !( 29TH AVE N E ANTHONY LA SHIGHWAY NO 88ANTHONY LAOLD HWY 8!(Storm Manholes ")Catchbasins !(Water System ValvesWatermains G!5 Water Hydrants !(Sewer ManholesStorm Gravity MainsSewer Gravity MainsRoadsWhiteParcel Boundary Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\29thAve_Improvements_Utility.mxd Date Saved: 8/10/2018 3:16:05 PM1 inch = 125 feet WSB Project #: 01164-000 Figure 4 - County Road C (29th Ave NE)Utility Improvements 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN 200 Feet 79 29TH AVE N E HIGHWAY NO 88ANTHONY LA SOLD HWY 8ANTHONY LACRESTVIE W D R RANKIN RDEAS T G A T E R D 1 inch = 200 feet WSB Project #: 01164-000 Figure 5 - Alternate Improvements County Road C (29th Ave NE) Turn Lane Improvements2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN 300 Feet Curb & Gutter Pavement Removal Roadway Concrete Walk 80 K:\011648-000\Cad\Exhibits\011648-000-FIGURE 6.dwg 04/09/2018 8:35 AMWSB Project No: 011648-000 WSBN SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100C. S . A .H . 8 8 COUNTY ROAD C15' EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN Figure 6 - Industrial Park Location Map 81 %&d( GâWX Minneapolis Diagnol TrailFrancis GrossGolf Course Pond Midland HillsCC PondsSilver Lake RdNE Taft StSaintAnthonyPkwy RooseveltStNE29th Ave NE Lowry Ave NE 26th Ave NE NE Stinson PkwyBrightonAveNENE Mckinley StSt Ant honyBlvdSa i n t A n t h o n y Bl v d StinsonBlvdNE23rd Ave NE AnthonyLaRidgway Pkwy 19th Ave NE 27th Ave NE Old Highway822nd Ave NE NewBrighton Blvd28th Ave NE 18th Ave NENEArthurStNE Garfield StISTH35WWilson St NENE Cleveland StCoolidge St NE25th1/2AveNENE Hayes StWaldenPlWalnut StKenzie TerCreastviewD rI ndust r i al BlvdW Armour Ter Harding St NEPahl Ave NERooseveltStNE Wilson StNE Benjamin StHayes St NEMurray Ave Q u arryCenterDr Anthony LaSLong Lake RdCounty Road CPatton RdTerminal Rd County Road BMi d la n d ViewCtFulham StMa r i onRdMNTH280WCleveland Dr State Hwy 36 Service Rd Eustis St NLaurie Rd WFulham St NFairways LaSaint Croix StSaint Stephen StRose Pl W AcornRdMNTH 36 WCl evel andServi ceDrNExisting Sidewalk Existing 8' Bituminous Trail 6' Proposed Concrete Trail 8' Proposed Bituminous Trail 8' Proposed Bituminous Trail - Optional St. Anthony City Limits 0 750Feet¯Figure 7 - Pedestrian Improvements 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\ProposedTrailImprovements_11x17.mxd Date Saved: 9/5/2018 4:46:07 PM1 inch = 750 feet 82 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 APPENDIX B COST TABLES 83 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE A - SILVER LAKE ROAD FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $25,500.00 1 $25,500.00 2 2101.524 CLEARING TREE $350.00 7 $2,450.00 3 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE $350.00 7 $2,450.00 4 2104.502 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EACH $600.00 4 $2,400.00 5 2104.502 ABANDON CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE EACH $600.00 1 $600.00 6 2104.603 ABANDON STORM SEWER (15")L F $14.00 50 $700.00 7 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $4.00 1960 $7,840.00 8 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)L F $25.00 90 $2,250.00 9 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE RETAINING WALL L F $90.00 50 $4,500.00 10 2104.503 SALVAGE GUARDRAIL L F $25.00 50 $1,250.00 11 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y $8.00 1400 $11,200.00 12 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR $140.00 60 $8,400.00 13 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 6 TON $22.00 1000 $22,000.00 14 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $4.00 150 $600.00 15 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION C Y $22.00 500 $11,000.00 16 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (3;F)TON $75.00 200 $15,000.00 17 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3;C)TON $72.00 500 $36,000.00 18 2411.502 CONCRETE HEADWALL EACH $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 19 2411.508 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED)LB $10.00 100 $1,000.00 20 2411.603 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL L F $300.00 50 $15,000.00 21 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F $54.00 30 $1,620.00 22 2503.503 30" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F $75.00 70 $5,250.00 23 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F $80.00 890 $71,200.00 24 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 25 2504.602 WATERMAIN OFFSET EACH $8,000.00 1 $8,000.00 26 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH $600.00 12 $7,200.00 27 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F $640.00 17 $10,880.00 28 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 72-4020 L F $830.00 52.5 $43,575.00 29 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 84-4020 L F $1,020.00 10 $10,200.00 30 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 2 EACH $75,000.00 1 $75,000.00 31 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS V C Y $175.00 200 $35,000.00 32 2554.603 INSTALL GUARDRAIL L F $35.00 50 $1,750.00 33 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 34 2571.524 DECIDUOUS TREE 3" CAL B&B TREE $650.00 7 $4,550.00 35 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $150.00 15 $2,250.00 36 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3N S Y $2.00 90 $180.00 37 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 33-261 LB $80.00 7 $560.00 38 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F $1.00 885 $885.00 39 2582.503 4" DOTTED LINE PAINT L F $0.50 670 $335.00 40 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F $2.00 330 $660.00 41 2582.618 PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL S F $15.00 15 $225.00 42 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6'EACH $2,000.00 4 $8,000.00 43 REMOVE CURB MEDIAN SY $15.00 56 $840.00 44 INSTALL CURB MEDIAN SY $100.00 56 $5,600.00 45 REMOVE ASBESTOS PIPE LF $55.00 300 $16,500.00 46 REMOVE WEIR LF $15.00 200 $3,000.00 47 REMOVE SEDIMENT AT OUTLET LS $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 $521,400.00 $52,140.00 $573,540.00 $143,385.00 $716,925.00 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE A - SILVER LAKE ROAD FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE A - SILVER LAKE ROAD FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE A - SILVER LAKE ROAD FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS 84 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE B - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD C) 48 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $7,300.00 1 $7,300.00 49 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L F $5.00 2200 $11,000.00 50 2104.601 RELOCATE MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES L S $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 51 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)C Y $18.00 440 $7,920.00 52 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (P)C Y $35.00 290 $10,150.00 53 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK S F $8.00 500 $4,000.00 54 2521.518 3" BITUMINOUS WALK S F $4.00 13000 $52,000.00 55 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F $18.00 1800 $32,400.00 56 2531.601 ADA COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR LS $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 57 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F $65.00 100 $6,500.00 58 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 59 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F $25.00 100 $2,500.00 60 2852.518 CROSSWALK EPOXY S F $10.00 630 $6,300.00 $145,070.00 $14,507.00 $159,577.00 $39,894.25 $199,471.25 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE B - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD C) + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE B - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD C) + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE B - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD C) 85 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE C - CONCRETE WALK IMPROVEMENTS 61 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $6,300.00 1 $6,300.00 62 2101.524 CLEARING TREE $500.00 1 $500.00 63 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE $500.00 1 $500.00 64 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L F $5.00 1800 $9,000.00 65 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)C Y $18.00 300 $5,400.00 66 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (P)C Y $35.00 200 $7,000.00 67 2411.618 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL S F $35.00 300 $10,500.00 68 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK S F $8.00 500 $4,000.00 69 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK S F $6.00 6600 $39,600.00 70 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F $18.00 1800 $32,400.00 71 2531.601 ADA COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR LS $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 72 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F $65.00 60 $3,900.00 73 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 74 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F $25.00 100 $2,500.00 75 2852.518 CROSSWALK EPOXY S F $10.00 630 $6,300.00 $130,400.00 $13,040.00 $143,440.00 $35,860.00 $179,300.00 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE C - CONCRETE WALK IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE C - CONCRETE WALK IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE C - CONCRETE WALK IMPROVEMENTS 86 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE D- SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 76 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $4,300.00 1 $4,300.00 77 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)L F $3.00 900 $2,700.00 78 2104.509 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $100.00 4 $400.00 79 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE (SANITARY)EACH $500.00 5 $2,500.00 80 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 40 $1,600.00 81 2503.601 SANITARY SEWER BYPASS PUMPING L S $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 82 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH $2,000.00 2 $4,000.00 83 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $220.00 4 $880.00 84 2503.602 8"X6" PVC WYE EACH $200.00 4 $800.00 85 2503.603 6" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 26 L F $30.00 200 $6,000.00 86 2503.603 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER L F $2.00 900 $1,800.00 87 2503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 35 L F $42.00 900 $37,800.00 88 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY)EACH $650.00 5 $3,250.00 89 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH $300.00 5 $1,500.00 90 2506.603 CONST 48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE L F $250.00 60 $15,000.00 91 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 $88,530.00 $8,853.00 $97,383.00 $24,345.75 $121,728.75 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE D- SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE D- SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE D- SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 87 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 92 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $8,200.00 1 $8,200.00 93 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $200.00 4 $800.00 94 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F $5.00 1,200 $6,000.00 95 2104.509 REMOVE WATER SERVICE AND CURB BOX EACH $100.00 4 $400.00 96 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT AND VALVE EACH $350.00 2 $700.00 97 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 40 $1,600.00 98 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE L S $20,000.00 1 $20,000.00 99 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH $250.00 4 $1,000.00 100 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH $2,000.00 4 $8,000.00 101 2504.602 8" X 6" WET TAP EACH $5,000.00 2 $10,000.00 102 2504.602 2" CORPORATION STOP EACH $500.00 4 $2,000.00 103 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH $2,200.00 5 $11,000.00 104 2504.602 2" CURB STOP & BOX EACH $500.00 4 $2,000.00 105 2504.602 HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH $5,500.00 3 $16,500.00 106 2504.603 2" TYPE K COPPER PIPE L F $42.00 200 $8,400.00 107 2504.603 6" WATER MAIN-DUCT IRON CL 52 W/ POLY WRAP L F $45.00 30 $1,350.00 108 2504.603 8" WATER MAIN-DUCT IRON CL 52 W/ POLY WRAP L F $52.00 1,200 $62,400.00 109 2504.604 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION S Y $45.00 100 $4,500.00 110 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND $5.00 1,000 $5,000.00 111 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 $170,850.00 $17,085.00 $187,935.00 $46,983.75 $234,918.75 PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 88 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE F - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 112 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $10,800.00 1 $10,800.00 113 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)L F $10.00 1,500 $15,000.00 114 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $500.00 11 $5,500.00 115 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 4 S Y $5.00 50 $250.00 116 2451.507 FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 40 $1,600.00 117 2501.502 18" RC PIPE APRON EACH $850.00 1 $850.00 118 2501.502 42" RC PIPE APRON EACH $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 119 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V L F $40.00 210 $8,400.00 120 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III L F $55.00 80 $4,400.00 121 2503.503 27" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III L F $58.00 650 $37,700.00 122 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III L F $80.00 120 $9,600.00 123 2503.503 42" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III L F $100.00 480 $48,000.00 124 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $1,000.00 2 $2,000.00 125 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 EACH $1,500.00 4 $6,000.00 126 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH $650.00 11 $7,150.00 127 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 L F $300.00 30 $9,000.00 128 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 L F $500.00 20 $10,000.00 129 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 72-4020 L F $750.00 10 $7,500.00 130 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 84-4020 L F $1,000.00 30 $30,000.00 131 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III C Y $200.00 30 $6,000.00 132 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 $225,750.00 $22,575.00 $248,325.00 $62,082.00 $310,407.00 ST ANTHONY, MN OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 TOTAL SCHEDULE F - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AUGUST 29, 2018 COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE F - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE F - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. 89 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE G - CSAH 88 TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS 133 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $20,000.00 1 $20,000.00 134 2104.502 REMOVE MARKER EACH $40.00 2 $80.00 135 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C EACH $50.00 4 $200.00 136 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $6.00 1500 $9,000.00 137 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L F $6.00 1700 $10,200.00 138 2104.504 REMOVE PAVEMENT S Y $8.00 2700 $21,600.00 139 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F $4.00 200 $800.00 140 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON C Y $8.00 600 $4,800.00 141 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y $12.00 500 $6,000.00 142 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)C Y $16.00 500 $8,000.00 143 2123.510 COMMON LABORERS HR $80.00 5 $400.00 144 2123.510 DOZER HR $160.00 5 $800.00 145 2123.510 10 CU YD TRUCK HR $180.00 5 $900.00 146 2123.510 0.75 CU YD FRONT END LOADER HR $125.00 5 $625.00 147 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HR $140.00 5 $700.00 148 2130.523 WATER M GALLON $40.00 5 $200.00 149 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y $30.00 200 $6,000.00 150 2302.602 DRILL & GROUT REINF BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH $22.00 5 $110.00 151 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4;B)TON $76.00 150 $11,400.00 152 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4;C)TON $78.00 250 $19,500.00 153 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V L F $55.00 50 $2,750.00 154 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 L F $95.00 50 $4,750.00 155 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH $800.00 1 $800.00 156 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH $720.00 2 $1,440.00 157 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 LIN FT $350.00 6 $2,100.00 158 2506.602 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $2,200.00 2 $4,400.00 159 2506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $750.00 2 $1,500.00 160 2506.602 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SPECIAL)EACH $500.00 2 $1,000.00 161 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $5.00 100 $500.00 162 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $7.50 200 $1,500.00 163 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B624 LIN FT $22.00 1000 $22,000.00 164 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT $42.00 32 $1,344.00 165 2565.616 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM A SYSTEM $60,000.00 1 $60,000.00 166 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 167 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $250.00 3 $750.00 168 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD $28.00 400 $11,200.00 169 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 POUND $2.00 200 $400.00 170 2575.505 SEEDING ACRE $1,000.00 0.8 $800.00 171 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 POUND $24.00 100 $2,400.00 172 2575.508 HYDRAULIC BONDED FIBER MATRIX POUND $1.00 2200 $2,200.00 173 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT $0.25 800 $200.00 174 2582.503 4" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT $1.00 100 $100.00 175 2582.518 PAVEMENT MESSAGE PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN SQ FT $26.00 120 $3,120.00 176 2582.518 CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN SQ FT $20.00 30 $600.00 $257,169.00 $25,717.00 $282,886.00 $70,721.50 $353,607.50 ALTERNATE COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENTS OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE G - CSAH 88 TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE G - CSAH 88 TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE G - CSAH 88 TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS 90 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE H - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (COUNTY ROAD C THROUGH CEMETERY) 177 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $6,100.00 1 $6,100.00 178 2101.524 CLEARING TREE $500.00 5 $2,500.00 179 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE $500.00 5 $2,500.00 180 2104.601 RELOCATE MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 181 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 182 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK S F $8.00 100 $800.00 183 2521.518 3" BITUMINOUS WALK S F $4.00 14600 $58,400.00 184 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)C Y $18.00 490 $8,820.00 185 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (P)C Y $35.00 330 $11,550.00 186 2531.601 ADA COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR LS $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 187 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F $65.00 20 $1,300.00 188 2571.524 CONIFEROUS TREE 12' HT B&B TREE $650.00 3 $1,950.00 189 2571.524 DECIDUOUS TREE 3" CAL B&B TREE $650.00 2 $1,300.00 190 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED L F $2.75 3000 $8,250.00 191 2573.604 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT L S $500.00 1 $500.00 192 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)C Y $22.00 280 $6,160.00 193 2575.535 WATER (TURF ESTABLISHMENT)M GAL $50.00 10 $500.00 194 2575.605 TURF ESTABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE L S $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 195 2575.605 BLOWN COMPOST SEEDING S Y $5.00 1700 $8,500.00 $127,630.00 $12,763.00 $140,393.00 $35,098.25 $175,491.25TOTAL SCHEDULE H - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (COUNTY ROAD C THROUGH CEMETERY) ALTERNATE COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE H - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (COUNTY ROAD C THROUGH CEMETERY) + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE H - BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (COUNTY ROAD C THROUGH CEMETERY) + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 91 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE I - SILVER LAKE ROAD AND 33RD AVENUE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 196 2565.616 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM A L S $31,800.00 1 $31,800.00 $31,800.00 $3,180.00 $34,980.00 $8,745.00 $43,725.00 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN AUGUST 29, 2018 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE I - SILVER LAKE ROAD AND 33RD AVENUE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE I - SILVER LAKE ROAD AND 33RD AVENUE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE I - SILVER LAKE ROAD AND 33RD AVENUE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 92 2019 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 APPENDIX C PROPOSED COUNTY ROAD C (29TH AVENUE NE) IMPROVEMENTS 93 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 1000 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 1030 1035 1040 1045 1050 200205210220022052210300EXISTING GROUND TYPICAL SECTION A-A THRU THRU C&G B424 C&G B424 4.0' VAR. 0.020.02 THRU C&G B424 THRU 0.02 TRAILBLVD 0.02 0.015 5.67'14.0'14.0'14.0'12.0'14.0' C&G B424 EXISTING GROUND BLVD 5.0' WALK 6.0' INP. R/WINP. R/W LEFT TURN LANE PROPOSED C.S.A.H. 94 (29TH AVE) MEDIAN PROP. R/W 2'2' PROP. R/W 8.0' THRU 0.02 C&G B424 THRU 0.02 14.0'12.0' 0.015 INFILTRATION BASIN ELEV: 949.0 EOF: 949.8 0.02 0.02 INP. R/W THRU THRU 12.0'12.0' 20.0' MEDIAN VARIES 5.67' BLVD TRAIL VAR. DRIVEWAY TYPICAL SECTION B-B INP. R/W PROPOSED C.S.A.H. 23 (COUNTY ROAD C) 20" WALL 3:1 8.0' 2' PROP. R/W TYPICAL SECTION C-C THRU THRU C&G B424 C&G B424 VAR. 0.02 0.02 BLVD C&G B424 THRU 0.02 BLVD 0.02 C&G B424 EXISTING GROUND 0.015 5.67'14.0'14.0'14.0'14.0'5.0' EXISTING GROUND WALK 6.0'16.0' INP. R/W INP. R/W PROPOSED C.S.A.H. 23 (COUNTY ROAD C) THRU MEDIAN 2' PROP. R/W TRAIL 8.0' 2' PROP. R/W EXISTING GROUND TYPICAL SECTION D-D THRU THRU C&G B424 C&G B424 4.0' VAR. 0.020.02 DRIVEWAY THRU C&G B424 THRU 0.02 C&G B612 BLVD 5.0' TRAILBLVD 0.02 EXISTING GROUND 0.015VARIES 5.67'14.0'14.0'14.0'12.0'12.0'VAR. INP. R/W INP. R/W LEFT TURN LANE PROPOSED C.S.A.H. 23 (COUNTY ROAD C) MEDIAN 8.0' TRAIL 2' PROP. R/W TYPICAL SECTION E-E THRU THRU C&G B424 C&G B424 4.0' VAR. 0.02 0.02 THRU C&G B424 THRU 0.02 C&G B424 EXISTING GROUND 14.0'14.0'14.0'12.0'14.0' EXISTING GROUND INP. R/WINP. R/W GUARDRAIL INP. 0.015 10.2' TRAILLEFT TURN LANE PROPOSED C.S.A.H. 23 (COUNTY ROAD C) 0.02 MEDIAN THRUTHRU C&G B424C&G B424 4.0' VAR .0.02 0.02 THRU C&G B424 THRU 0.02 0.02 14.0'14.0'14.0'12.0'14.0' C&G B424 INP. R/W INP. WALK INP. R/W BLVD VAR. 0.015 8.0' TRAIL 5.67' BLVD 20" WALL 3:1 TYPICAL SECTION F-F LEFT TURN LANE PROPOSED C.S.A.H. 23 (COUNTY ROAD C) MEDIAN EXISTING GROUND TYPICAL SECTION G-G THRU C&G B618 C&G B618 VAR. VAR. 0.02 0.02 THRU 0.02 14.0'12.5'11.0'11.0' C&G B618 EXISTING GROUND BLVD VAR. WALK 6.0' PROPOSED LONG LAKE ROAD C&G B618 12.5' INP. R/W RIGHT TURN LANE LEFT TURN LANE LEFT TURN LANE INP. WALK MEDIAN EXISTING GROUND TYPICAL SECTION H-H THRU C&G B618 C&G B618 VAR. 0.02 0.02 THRU 0.02 12.5'11.0'11.0' C&G B618 EXISTING GROUND BLVD VAR. PROPOSED LONG LAKE ROAD C&G B618 12.5' INP. R/W RIGHT TURN LANESTRIPED MEDIANLEFT TURN LANE VAR. BLVD VAR.4.0' INP. R/W INP. WALK INP. WALK MEDIAN ..\Projects\2018\180087\DESIGN\Layouts\cd180087_RoadwayLayout6.dgnFILE NAME =DATE PRINTED =8/23/201811:54:58 AME N G I N E E R I N G ALLIANT 0 50 100 SCALE 50' HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 SCALE 50' HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET LEGEND TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS BITUMINOUS TRAIL CONCRETE WALK VEGETATED MEDIAN DRIVEWAY INPLACE BUILDING / STRUCTURE PARCEL BOUNDARY CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE ROADWAY BITUMINOUS ROADWAY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY D D E E C C A A GGB B F F HHN EW BRIGHTON BLVD (CSAH 88)LONG LAKE RDANTHONY LNANTHONY LN S PATTON RDEUSTIS STWALNUT STMINNESOTA COMMERCIAL RAILWAYMINNESOTA COMMERCIAL RAILWAYOLD HWY 8RANKIN RDE G A TE R D COUNTY ROAD C (CSAH 23) / 29TH AVE NE (CSAH 94)HENNEPIN COUNTYRAMSEY COUNTYST ANTHONY VILLAGECITY OF ROSEVILLEHAMMOND CO. WALTER R. GAS MARATHON AVS INC. SYSTEMS PROCESS LABEL COMMONS BUSINESS ROSEVILLE COMMONS II BUSINESS ROSEVILLE OFFICES ANTHONY LANE SUPPLY B & F FASTENER OF OPERATING ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL UNION WORKS IRON CROWN TRUCK RENTAL PENSKE LUBE TECH ABC SUPPLY CO. FERGUSON ABLE HOSE & RUBBER ENERGY NUSTAR LAND TITLE DENTAL PARK CENTER INDUSTRIAL ROSEVILLE ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA PARTNERS MIDSTREAM MAGELLAN PARTNERS MIDSTREAM MAGELLAN 12' THRU 14' THRU (CSAH 94) 29TH AVE NE 14' LEFT (100') 13' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (130') 14' THRU 12' THRU 14' LEFT (130') 14' THRU 12' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (100') 12' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 12' THRU 14' LEFT (125') 12' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (125') 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (100') 14' THRU 14' THRU 12' THRU 14' THRU (CSAH 23) COUNTY ROAD C 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (100') 12' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (100') 14' THRU 14' THRU 12' THRU 14' THRU14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 12' THRU 14' LEFT (100') 12' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (150') 14' THRU 12' THRU 14' THRU 14' THRU 14' LEFT (370') 12' THRU 14' THRU 5' BLVD 6' WALK 5' BLVD 6' WALK 8' TRAIL 5' BLVD 8' TRAIL 5' BLVD R8022' R7978' R7978'R8022' (45 MPH REVERSE CROWN) R4584' VAR. BLVD 6' INP. WALK 16' MEDIAN 16' MEDIAN B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.)B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B424 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B618 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) B618 CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) 14' LEFT (150') 14' THRU 8' TRAIL 5' BLVD R8022' R8022' B612 CURB AND GUTTER VAR. BLVD5' INP. WALK17' THRU17' THRU14.5' THRU12.5' LEFT (50')14.5' THRU14' THRU12.5' LEFT (125')11' THRU12.5' RIGHT (100')12.5' RIGHT (100')11' THRU11' LEFT (200')12.5' LEFT (200')14' THRU12.5' THRU12.5' THRU12.5' RIGHT (125')VAR. BLVD5' INP. WALKFINAL ROADWAY LAYOUT RAMSEY COUNTY S.A.P. NO. 062-623-054 NEW BRIGHTON BOULEVARD (CSAH 88) TO LONG LAKE ROAD 12' LEFT (200')12' LEFT (200')14' RIGHT14' THRU29TH AVE NE 94 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 FEASIBILITY REPORT 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE, MINNESOTA September 11, 2018 REVISED APRIL 9, 2019 Prepared By: 95 CERTIFICATION 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Justin G. Messner, PE Date: April 9, 2019 Lic. No. 45857 Quality Assurance / Quality Control: Todd E. Hubmer, PE Date: April 9, 2019 Lic. No. 24043 96 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 TITLE SHEET CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................1 2.INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................2 2.1 Authorization...............................................................................................2 2.2 Scope..........................................................................................................2 2.3 Data Available.............................................................................................2 2.4 Project Location ..........................................................................................2 2.5 Project History.............................................................................................2 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS.......................................................................................3 3.1 Sanitary Sewer............................................................................................3 3.2 Water Main..................................................................................................3 3.3 Storm Sewer ...............................................................................................3 3.4 Streets.........................................................................................................3 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................4 4.1 Sanitary Sewer............................................................................................4 4.2 Water Main..................................................................................................4 4.3 Storm Sewer ...............................................................................................4 4.4 Street...........................................................................................................4 4.5 Permits and Approvals................................................................................5 4.6 Detour Routes.............................................................................................5 5. FINANCING...........................................................................................................6 5.1 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.......................................................6 5.2 Funding Sources.........................................................................................6 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE..........................................................................................8 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION.............................................................9 APPENDICES Appendix A – Figures Appendix B – Cost Tables 97 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Revisions to the existing 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project Feasibility Report, originally prepared in September of 2018, were initiated by City Staff following additional discussions with Council conernning the options presented for the 2019 and 2020 improvements. The 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project consists of the reconstruction of approximately 1,800 feet of 30-foot urban section streets complete with bituminous paving and concrete curb and gutter along the following roadways: 32nd Avenue NE from Rankin Road to Croft Drive Croft Drive from 32nd Avenue NE to 31st Avenue NE Silver Lake Terrace from Silver Lane to the north terminate end The proposed utility improvements include the removal and replacement of approximately 1,800 feet of water main and sanitary sewer main, the extension of new storm sewer where facilities do not currently exist and installation of additional catch basins to improve area drainage. Also proposed for improvement in 2020 is the bituminous mill and overlay of Silver Lane from Stinson Boulevard NE to Silver Lake Road. A map illustrating the project location can be found on Figure 1 of Appendix A. The total estimated project cost for the 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project is approximately $2.45 million. Funding for the project will come from the City’s Street and Utility Reconstruction Funds (Public Improvement Bonds) and Special Assessments to benefiting properties. The project reconstruction can be completed, including the first lift of bituminous paving and all restoration items, in 2020. The final lift of bituminous paving is proposed to be installed in June of 2021. This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint and should be constructed as proposed herein. 98 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 2 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization On May 22, 2018, the St. Anthony Village City Council authorized the preparation of an engineering Feasibility Report for the 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project. This project was authorized under City of St. Anthony Village Resolution 18-045. Following the acceptance of the Feasibility Report on September 11, 2018, Council requested the Feasibility Report be revised based on additional discussion regarding the options presented. 2.2 Scope The proposed project consists of reconstructing the following roadways: 32nd Avenue NE from Rankin Road to Croft Drive Croft Drive from 32nd Avenue NE to 31st Avenue NE Silver Lake Terrace from Silver Lane to the north terminate end Proposed improvements include road reconstruction complete with bituminous paving and concrete curb and gutter, watermain and sanitary sewer replacement, and the extension of new storm sewer and installation of additional catch basins to improve area drainage. In addition to the locations described above, the feasibility report also includes the review and cost analysis to mill and overlay Silver Lane from Stinson Boulevard NE to Silver Lake Road. 2.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: City of St. Anthony Village Record Drawings City of St. Anthony Village Topographic Maps Subsurface Exploration Field observations of area 2.4 Project Location The project includes the following streets: Street and Utility Improvements: 32nd Avenue NE from Rankin Road to Croft Drive Croft Drive from 32nd Avenue NE to 31st Avenue NE Silver Lake Terrace from Silver Lane to the north terminate end Mill and Overlay Improvements: Silver Lane from Stinson Boulevard NE to Silver Lake Road The project areas are identified on Figure 1 in Appendix A of this report. 2.5 Project History This project was initiated through the recognition of the following conditions in the project area: Deterioration of street conditions Re-occurring water main breaks in the project limits Streets, sanitary sewer, water main lines are over 50 years old and are exhibiting deterioration problems As a result, On May 22, 2018, the St. Anthony Village City Council authorized the preparation of an engineering feasibility report for the 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project. 99 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 3 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system in the project area consists of 9-inch-diameter vitrified clay pipe (VCP) installed in the 1950’s. The joint sealing material in use at that time was typically an oakum and bituminous material. An internal inspection, with a specially designed television camera, will be completed with final design to determine the structural condition of the existing pipe and individual services. 3.2 Water Main The existing water distribution mains along 32nd Avenue NE and Croft Drive were also installed in the 1950’s and consist of 6-inch cast iron pipe (CIP). This system has had numerous breaks over the past few years and breaks will become more likely as the pipes have exceeded 60 years of service. In addition, the cast iron pipes are likely heavily corroded and possibly leaking. The existing water distribution main along Silver Lake Terrace was installed in 1996 and consist of 4-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP). 3.3 Storm Sewer The existing storm sewer system along 32nd Avenue NE and Croft Drive consists of 12-inch and 15-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) located at the easterly cul-de-sac on 32nd Avenue NE. The existing storm sewer system on 32nd Avenue NE collects runoff from the following areas and conveys stormwater to the existing storm sewer system on Old Highway 8 which eventually outlets to Mirror Lake: Skycroft Drive from 33rd Avenue to 32nd Avenue Croft Drive from 33rd Avenue to 32nd Avenue 32nd Avenue NE from approximately midblock east of Silver Lake Road Rankin Road from 33rd Avenue NE to 32nd Avenue Hillendale Avenue from approximately midblock east of Silver Lake Road The existing storm sewer system along Silver Lake Terrace consists of a shallow storm crossing with a road grate that crossing Silver Lake Terrace south of the road terminus. The drainage outlets to the west and eventually discharges to Silver Lake. 3.4 Streets The proposed reconstruction area consists of 30-foot-wide bituminous streets with curb and gutter, except for Silver Lake Terrace. Silver Lake Terrace consists of a 22-foot-wide bituminous, rural street (no curb and gutter). Soil borings will be completed during final design to determine the underlying soils in the area. Soil borings completed within various locations throughout the City have indicated the underlying soils consist of silty clay fill or sandy clay fill. Given the consistency in the soils throughout the City, the underlying soils are assumed to be similar. 100 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 4 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Sanitary Sewer The existing 9-inch VCP will be reconstructed with 8-inch polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipe, including the replacement of sanitary sewer services. All services are proposed to be replaced with 6-inch PVC service pipe from the sewer main to the right-of-way. Replacing aging trunk utility facilities at the same time as the road construction is a proactive means by which to mitigate future maintenance costs. The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are shown on Figure 4 and Figure 5 in Appendix A. 4.2 Water Main Existing 6-inch CIP and 4-inch DIP is proposed to be replaced with 8-inch DIP, including the replacement of water services up to and including the curb stop. Services will be replaced up to the right-of-way with the appropriate 2-inch copper service pipe. All existing water main in the project area will be equipped with new valves and hydrants as necessary for proper operation and fire protection. Replacement of existing services will alleviate head loss and increase water pressure to properties by providing a clean service pipe. The proposed water system improvements are shown on Figure 6 and Figure 7 in Appendix A. 4.3 Storm Sewer Reconstruction of the road provides the opportunity to improve drainage in the area with the installation of additional storm sewer facilities. The existing storm sewer system will be improved with the addition of catch basins along the roadway to better accommodate area drainage and the extension of new storm sewer where facilities do not currently exist. The proposed storm sewer improvements are shown on Figure 8 and Figure 9 in Appendix A. 4.4 Street Reconstruction of the existing street is intended to improve the design strength of the pavement system and provide a street surface with an extended life for the City of St. Anthony Village. Roadways are proposed to be replaced at their current width from back-of-curb to back-of-curb, which allows for two 12-foot driving lanes and 2-foot reaction areas on each side of the street. After the subgrade excavation is completed in the streets, a geotextile fabric will be placed to separate the existing underlying soft materials from the granular materials. Twelve inches (12”) of select granular material or "sand cushion" will be placed on the geotextile fabric to provide a firm base for the eight inches (8”) of Class 5 aggregate base and four inches (4”) of bituminous asphalt pavement. These streets will be replaced with bituminous asphalt pavement per City Council Resolution 07- 022. The decision was reached following the outcome of the Street Reconstruction Task Force report presented on November 13, 2007. Additional improvements include removing and replacing the existing block retaining wall located at the northwest end of the cul-de-sac on Silver Lake Terrace. The existing 8-foot retaining wall is beginning to lean away from the roadway causingseperation in the adjacent driveway. The retaining wall is proposed to be removed and a new large block wall installed. 101 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 5 Improvements along Silver Lane include milling down the existing bituminous pavement 1 3/4- inches along the full width of the roadway. A new 1 3/4-inches wear course will then be paved over the entire street extending the pavement life of the roadway until the road can be reconstructing in the future. The proposed typical sections are shown on Figure 10 and Figure 11 in Appendix A. 4.5 Permits and Approvals Reconstruction of the roadways will disturb over one acre and will require a National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) General Storm Water Permit (MNR 100001) that must be obtained by the City of St. Anthony Village from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The reconstruction of the existing water main will require a permit from the Minnesota Department of Health. The reconstruction will also require a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). This may require stormwater treatment for the runoff from the project area. 4.6 Detour Routes The project will require significant excavation and disposal of unacceptable material from the existing street area and a supply of significant volumes of select granular base, aggregate base, and bituminous pavement materials. This effort will require closing the roads under construction and increasing loaded truck traffic on the streets adjacent to the construction area. Adequately signed detours will be identified to direct traffic around the construction zones and notify users of the increased truck and construction activity. To accommodate the property owners along the excavated roads, temporary parking on the adjacent streets may be necessary during the periods when vehicle access is not possible. 102 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 6 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost A detailed breakdown of the Cost Opinion for the proposed project is included in Appendix B. The opinion of cost incorporates the construction costs experienced during 2016, 2017 and 2018, and includes a 10% contingency factor for 32nd Avenue NE and Croft Drive and a 5% contingency factory for Silver Lake Terrace and Silver Lane. Administrative costs are projected at 25% of the construction cost and include engineering, legal, financing, and other administrative costs. A summary of the project costs is as follows: 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS City of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota Opinion of Probable Cost Proposed Improvements Total Cost Total Street Improvements $1,251,900 Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements $267,600 Total Water Main Improvements $382,000 Total Storm Sewer Improvements $197,800 Total Mill and Overlay Improvements $346,900 Total Proposed Improvements $2,446,200 5.2 Funding Sources The total project cost is projected to be approximately $2.45 million. Funding for the project will come from the 429 Public Improvement Bonds and Special Assessments to benefiting properties. The City’s policy for street assessment is based on front footage along improved roads. For road reconstruction projects, along single family residential (R1) zones, the property owner is assessed 35% of total street and local drainage construction costs and each property owner that receives a new water service will be assessed 100% of the actual service cost. The proposed assessed parcels for the road reconstruction improvements of the 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project are shown on Figure 2 and Figure 3 in Appendix A. 103 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 7 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS City of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota Funding Summary Proposed Improvements Special Assessments City Costs Total Street Improvements $388,100 $863,800 $1,251,900 Sanitary Sewer Improvement $0 $267,600 $267,600 Water Main Improvements $27,700 $354,300 $382,000 Storm Sewer Improvements $61,300 $136,500 $197,800 Mill and Overlay Improvements $0 $346,900 $346,900 Total $477,100 $1,969,100 $2,446,200 104 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 8 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule for this improvement is as follows: Task Completion Date 1. Order Feasibility Report.......................................................................................May 22, 2018 2. Accept Feasibility Report and order plans and specifications...................September 11, 2018 3. Accept Revised Feasibility Report and order plans and specifications .................April 9, 2019 4. Hold first public information meeting...............................................................September 2019 5. Approve plans/specifications, and order Ad for Bid .........................................November 2019 6. Receive bids, compute assessments...................................................................January 2020 7. Approve resolutions on improvement and assessment hearings ........................January 2020 8. Hold second public information meeting ............................................................February 2020 9. Public hearing for project, assessments, award bid, call bond sale...................February 2020 10. Award sale of bonds ...............................................................................................March 2020 11. Begin construction.............................................................................................May/June 2020 12. Certify assessments to a county auditor................................................................August 2020 13. Substantial completion of construction............................................................September 2020 14. Final completion of construction (Final wear paving along Reconstructed roadways and mill/overlay along Silver Lane) ..................................June 2021 105 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 PAGE 9 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION Project costs are anticipated to be approximately $2.45 million. Due to the poor structural condition of portions of the street sections, the deterioration of the existing sanitary sewer system and frequent water main breaks, this project is both feasible and necessary from an engineering standpoint. Based on our analysis and data presented, the proposed project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint. We recommend reconstruction of the sanitary sewer, water main, stormwater collection system, and the street as detailed in this report. 106 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 APPENDIX A FIGURES 107 33RD AVE N E 34TH AVE N E 39TH AVE NE PINE AS H 32ND AVE N ESTINSON BLVD NEFOSS RDGUM HIGHCREST RDANTHONY LA SSILVER LAKE RDRANKIN RDSILVER LN MAPLEWOOD DR OAK MACALASTER DRKENZIE TERARMOUR TER27TH AVE N E 30TH AVE N E ST ANTHONY BLVD ARMOUR TER WSTINSON BLVD N EPAHL AVE FRONTAGE RDROOSEVELT ST N E29TH AVE N E 37TH AVE NE EDWARD ST N ECOOLIDGE ST N EHARDING ST N ECROFT DRBELL LA MURRAY AVE BELDEN DRFORDHAM DRANTHONY LA31ST AVE N E 36TH AVE N E HIGHWAY NO 88HILLDALE AVE N EPENROD LNSHAMROCK DRTOWNVIEW AVE 37TH AVE N E EDGEMERE AVE WENDHURST AVE SKYCROFT DRHCRRA CORRIDOR2020 Street & Utility Improvements 2020 Mill and Overlay City Boundary 0 1,750Feet¯Figure 1 - Project Location2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure1_ProjectLocation.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 11:55:54 AM1 inch = 1,750 feet WSB Project #: 01164-000 108 21 30 47 16 46 15 41 32 29 37 36 35 34 38 40 39 334443454942 31 48RANKIN RDOLD HWY 8CROFT DR33RD AVE N E 31ST AVE N E 32ND AVE N E SKYCROFT DRHIGHWAY NO 88TOWNVIEW AVE HILLDALE AVE N E CROFT DRCROFT DRSKYCROFT DRAssessed Parcels 2020 Street & Utility Improvements 0 200Feet¯Figure 2 - Project Location & Assessment Parcels2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure2_AssessmentMap.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 12:09:53 PM1 inch = 200 feet 109 9 6 87 4 3 5 2 1 SILVER LNSIL V E R L A K E T E R SILVER LAKE CT2020 Street & Utility Improvements Assessed Parcels 0 200Feet¯Figure 3 - Project Location & Assessment Parcels2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure3_AssessmentMap.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 12:14:55 PM1 inch = 200 feet 110 """""""""""" !( !(!(!(!( !(RANKIN RDOLD HWY 8CROFT DR33RD AVE N E 31ST AVE N E 32ND AVE N E SKYCROFT DRHIGHWAY NO 88TOWNVIEW AVE HILLDALE AVE N E CROFT DRCROFT DRSKYCROFT DR!(Sewer Manholes "Sewer Gravity Mains 0 200Feet¯Figure 4 - Sanitary Sewer2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure4_SanitarySewer.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 12:21:36 PM1 inch = 200 feet 111 """ " !( !( !( !(SILVER LNSIL V E R L A K E T E R SILVER LAKE CT!(Sewer Manholes "Sewer Gravity Mains 0 200Feet¯Figure 5 - Sanitary Sewer2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure5_SanitarySewer.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 12:34:18 PM1 inch = 200 feet 112 G!5 !( !( !( !(!(!(OLD HWY 8RANKIN RD33RD AVE N E CROFT DR31ST AVE N E 32ND AVE N E HIGHWAY NO 88CRESTVIEW DRSKYCROFT DRBELL LA HIGHCREST RDTOWNVIEW AVE SKYCROFT CIR HILLDALE AVE N E ARMOUR TER ANTHONY LACROFT DRCROFT DRSKYCROFT DR!(Water System Valves G!5 Water Hydrants Watermain 0 300Feet¯Figure 6 - Watermain2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure6_Watermain.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 12:28:01 PM1 inch = 300 feet WSB Project #: 01164-000 113 G!5 !( !(SILVER LNSIL V E R L A K E T E R SILVER LAKE CT!(Water System Valves G!5 Water Hydrants Watermain 0 200Feet¯Figure 7 - Watermain2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure7_Watermain.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 12:46:59 PM1 inch = 200 feet WSB Project #: 01164-000 114 """""""""""" !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( ") ")!(OLD HWY 8RANKIN RD33RD AVE N E CROFT DR31ST AVE N E 32ND AVE N E HIGHWAY NO 88CRESTVIEW DRSKYCROFT DRBELL LA HIGHCREST RDTOWNVIEW AVE SKYCROFT CIR HILLDALE AVE N E ARMOUR TER ANTHONY LACROFT DRCROFT DRSKYCROFT DR!(Existing Manholes ")Existing Catchbasins !(New Structures "New Pipe "Future Pipe 0 300Feet¯Figure 8 - Storm Sewer2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure8_StormSewer.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 12:53:02 PM1 inch = 300 feet WSB Project #: 011648-000 115 """) ")") ")SILVER LNSIL V E R L A K E T E R SILVER LAKE CT")Existing Catchbasins "Storm Sewer 0 200Feet¯Figure 9 - Storm Sewer2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: K:\011648-000\GIS\Maps\Feasibility Figures\FinalFigures\Figure9_StormSewer.mxd Date Saved: 3/28/2019 1:09:52 PM1 inch = 200 feet WSB Project #: 011648-000 116 1 1/2" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSEMIXTURE (2,C) SPWEB240C (PG 58-34)2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT2 1/2" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON WEARING COURSEMIXTURE (2,C) SPNWB240C (PG 58-34)8" AGGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 OR RECYCLE12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROWGEOTEXTILE FABIC (MN/DOT 3733, TYPE V)24" SUBGRADE PREPARATION (SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT)15' to Back of Curb℄ROADWAY30' Right of Way30' Right of Way15' to Back of CurbB618 ConcreteCurb & GutterB618 ConcreteCurb & GutterDraintile(typical)both sides2.5%2.5%WSB Project No: 011648-000WSBFigure 10 - Typical Section2020 Street and Utility Improvement ProjectSt. Anthony, MN117 MILL 1 3/4" EXISTING BITUMINOUS 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 1 3/4" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEB240B (PG 58-28) ℄ ROADWAY 30' Right of Way30' Right of Way 14' Existing Curb & Gutter Existing Curb & Gutter 2.5%2.5% 14' MILL 1 3/4" EXISTING BITUMINOUS 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 1 3/4" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEB240B (PG 58-28) ℄ ROADWAY New Surmountable Curb & Gutter New Surmountable Curb & Gutter SILVER LANE SILVER LAKE TERRACE 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project St. Anthony, MN Figure 11 - Mill & Overlay WSB Project No: 011648-000 WSB 118 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE WSB PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 APPENDIX B COST TABLES 119 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE A - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $29,200.00 1 $29,200.00 2 2021.601 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION L S $500.00 1 $500.00 3 2101.524 CLEARING TREE $350.00 30 $10,500.00 4 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE $350.00 30 $10,500.00 5 2101.524 CLEAR & GRUB - HEDGE L F $10.00 100 $1,000.00 6 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN EACH $50.00 3 $150.00 7 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L F $5.00 2600 $13,000.00 8 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $5.00 500 $2,500.00 9 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $4.00 300 $1,200.00 10 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT S Y $6.50 700 $4,550.00 11 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y $4.50 4600 $20,700.00 12 2104.601 RELOCATE MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 13 2104.601 CLEAN UP L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 14 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y $1.50 4800 $7,200.00 15 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)C Y $20.00 1000 $20,000.00 16 2105.507 MUCK EXCAVATION (CV)C Y $20.00 200 $4,000.00 17 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (P)C Y $20.00 1600 $32,000.00 18 2105.507 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P)C Y $30.00 1600 $48,000.00 19 2105.507 STABILIZING AGGREGATE C Y $35.00 200 $7,000.00 20 2112.601 SUBGRADE PREPARATION (SPECIAL)ROAD STA $400.00 13 $5,200.00 21 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR $150.00 40 $6,000.00 22 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P)C Y $32.00 1000 $32,000.00 23 2331.501 JOINT ADHESIVE - MASTIC L F $1.00 2600 $2,600.00 24 2331.601 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $40.00 100 $4,000.00 25 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON $3.50 230 $805.00 26 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON $68.00 400 $27,200.00 27 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON $68.00 700 $47,600.00 28 2411.502 CONCRETE STAIRWAY EACH $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 29 2502.503 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN L F $12.00 330 $3,960.00 30 2502.503 6" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN L F $14.00 2600 $36,400.00 31 2502.602 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH $250.00 10 $2,500.00 32 2504.602 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR EACH $500.00 5 $2,500.00 33 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION L S $500.00 1 $500.00 34 2506.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAIN TILE EACH $200.00 1 $200.00 35 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F $14.00 2600 $36,400.00 36 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $65.00 800 $52,000.00 37 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 38 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F $20.00 30 $600.00 39 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE SPECIAL S F $30.00 18 $540.00 40 2564.602 INSTALL SIGN EACH $100.00 3 $300.00 41 2564.602 FURNISH SIGN POSTS EACH $100.00 6 $600.00 42 2571.524 CONIFEROUS TREE 12' HT B&B EACH $650.00 20 $13,000.00 43 2571.524 DECIDUOUS TREE 3" CAL B&B EACH $650.00 20 $13,000.00 44 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F $2.00 1300 $2,600.00 45 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $200.00 15 $3,000.00 46 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW BIOROLL L F $2.50 1300 $3,250.00 47 2573.604 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE L S $500.00 1 $500.00 48 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y $30.00 900 $27,000.00 49 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLONS $500.00 10 $5,000.00 50 2575.535 WATER (TURF ESTABLISHMENT)M GALLONS $45.00 30 $1,350.00 51 2575.605 TURF ESTABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE L S $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 52 2575.605 BLOWN COMPOST SEEDING S Y $3.00 4500 $13,500.00 53 2582.502 12" SOLID LINE PAINT L F $5.00 30 $150.00 54 2582.502 12" SOLID LINE EPOXY L F $8.00 30 $240.00 $572,995.00 $57,300.00 $630,295.00 $157,574.00 $787,869.00TOTAL SCHEDULE A - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 32ND AVENUE AND CROFT DRIVE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE A - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE A - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. 120 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE B - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 55 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $16,900.00 1 $16,900.00 56 2021.601 CONTRACTOR COORDINATION L S $500.00 1 $500.00 57 2101.524 CLEARING TREE $350.00 30 $10,500.00 58 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE $350.00 30 $10,500.00 59 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN EACH $50.00 3 $150.00 60 2104.503 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL RETAINING WALL L F $50.00 100 $5,000.00 61 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $5.00 120 $600.00 62 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $4.00 130 $520.00 63 2104.505 REMOVE RETAINING WALL S F $10.00 400 $4,000.00 64 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $10.00 100 $1,000.00 65 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $10.00 300 $3,000.00 66 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y $4.50 1,200 $5,400.00 67 2104.601 RELOCATE MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES L S $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 68 2104.601 CLEAN UP L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 69 2104.618 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL BRICK PAVER S F $25.00 1000 $25,000.00 70 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S Y $1.50 2300 $3,450.00 71 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)C Y $20.00 600 $12,000.00 72 2105.507 MUCK EXCAVATION (CV)C Y $20.00 60 $1,200.00 73 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (P)C Y $20.00 580 $11,600.00 74 2105.507 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P)C Y $30.00 580 $17,400.00 75 2105.507 STABILIZING AGGREGATE C Y $35.00 60 $2,100.00 76 2112.601 SUBGRADE PREPARATION (SPECIAL)ROAD STA $400.00 5 $2,000.00 77 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR $150.00 40 $6,000.00 78 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P)C Y $32.00 390 $12,480.00 79 2331.501 JOINT ADHESIVE - MASTIC L F $1.00 1200 $1,200.00 80 2331.601 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $45.00 30 $1,350.00 81 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON $5.00 80 $400.00 82 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON $80.00 140 $11,200.00 83 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON $80.00 230 $18,400.00 84 2411.618 LARGE BLOCK RETAINING WALL SF $65.00 600 $39,000.00 85 2502.503 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN L F $12.00 200 $2,400.00 86 2502.503 6" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN L F $14.00 1200 $16,800.00 87 2502.602 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH $250.00 6 $1,500.00 88 2504.602 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR EACH $500.00 3 $1,500.00 89 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION L S $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 90 2506.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAIN TILE EACH $300.00 1 $300.00 91 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F $22.00 1200 $26,400.00 92 2531.507 7" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER S Y $85.00 40 $3,400.00 93 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $75.00 300 $22,500.00 94 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 95 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F $20.00 30 $600.00 96 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE SPECIAL S F $50.00 10 $500.00 97 2564.602 FURNISH SIGN POSTS EACH $100.00 3 $300.00 98 2571.524 CONIFEROUS TREE 12' HT B&B EACH $650.00 15 $9,750.00 99 2571.524 DECIDUOUS TREE 3" CAL B&B EACH $650.00 15 $9,750.00 100 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS L F $2.00 1000 $2,000.00 101 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $200.00 5 $1,000.00 102 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW BIOROLL L F $2.50 1000 $2,500.00 103 2573.604 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE L S $600.00 1 $600.00 104 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y $30.00 300 $9,000.00 105 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLONS $500.00 2 $1,000.00 106 2575.535 WATER (TURF ESTABLISHMENT)M GALLONS $45.00 20 $900.00 107 2575.605 TURF ESTABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE L S $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 108 2575.605 BLOWN COMPOST SEEDING S Y $3.00 1500 $4,500.00 $353,550.00 $17,678.00 $371,228.00 $92,807.00 $464,035.00 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE B - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE B - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS APRIL 9, 2019 SILVER LAKE TERRACE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE B - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS + 5% CONTINGENCIES OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN 121 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 109 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)L F $3.00 1,300 $3,900.00 110 2104.509 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $100.00 22 $2,200.00 111 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE (SANITARY)EACH $500.00 6 $3,000.00 112 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 100 $4,000.00 113 2503.601 SANITARY SEWER BYPASS PUMPING L S $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 114 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH $2,000.00 6 $12,000.00 115 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $220.00 22 $4,840.00 116 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH $300.00 6 $1,800.00 117 2503.602 8"X6" PVC WYE EACH $200.00 22 $4,400.00 118 2503.603 6" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 26 L F $30.00 700 $21,000.00 119 2503.603 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER L F $2.00 1,300 $2,600.00 120 2503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 35 L F $42.00 1,300 $54,600.00 121 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY)EACH $650.00 6 $3,900.00 122 2506.603 CONST 48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE L F $250.00 60 $15,000.00 $135,740.00 $13,574.00 $149,314.00 $37,328.50 $186,642.50 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 TOTAL SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 32ND AVENUE AND CROFT DRIVE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. 122 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE D - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 123 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)L F $3.00 460 $1,380.00 124 2104.509 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $100.00 9 $900.00 125 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE (SANITARY)EACH $500.00 3 $1,500.00 126 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 100 $4,000.00 127 2503.601 SANITARY SEWER BYPASS PUMPING L S $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 128 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 129 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH $220.00 9 $1,980.00 130 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH $300.00 3 $900.00 131 2503.602 8"X6" PVC WYE EACH $200.00 9 $1,800.00 132 2503.603 6" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 26 L F $30.00 360 $10,800.00 133 2503.603 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER L F $2.00 500 $1,000.00 134 2503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 35 L F $42.00 500 $21,000.00 135 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY)EACH $650.00 3 $1,950.00 136 2506.603 CONST 48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE L F $250.00 40 $10,000.00 $61,710.00 $3,086.00 $64,796.00 $16,199.00 $80,995.00 + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE D - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SILVER LAKE TERRACE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE D - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS + 5% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE D - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 123 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 137 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $200.00 6 $1,200.00 138 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F $5.00 1,300 $6,500.00 139 2104.509 REMOVE WATER SERVICE AND CURB BOX EACH $100.00 22 $2,200.00 140 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT AND VALVE EACH $350.00 3 $1,050.00 141 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 95 $3,800.00 142 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE L S $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 143 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH $250.00 22 $5,500.00 144 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH $2,000.00 5 $10,000.00 145 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH $250.00 22 $5,500.00 146 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH $2,200.00 6 $13,200.00 147 2504.602 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH $300.00 22 $6,600.00 148 2504.602 HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH $5,500.00 4 $22,000.00 149 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE L F $32.00 700 $22,400.00 150 2504.603 6" WATER MAIN-DUCT IRON CL 52 W/ POLY WRAP L F $48.00 60 $2,880.00 151 2504.603 8" WATER MAIN-DUCT IRON CL 52 W/ POLY WRAP L F $52.00 1,300 $67,600.00 152 2504.604 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION S Y $45.00 100 $4,500.00 153 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND $5.00 800 $4,000.00 $188,930.00 $18,893.00 $207,823.00 $51,955.75 $259,778.75 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 TOTAL SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 32ND AVENUE AND CROFT DRIVE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE E - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. 124 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE F - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 154 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $200.00 2 $400.00 155 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F $5.00 430 $2,150.00 156 2104.509 REMOVE WATER SERVICE AND CURB BOX EACH $100.00 9 $900.00 157 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT AND VALVE EACH $350.00 2 $700.00 158 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 100 $4,000.00 159 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE L S $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 160 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH $250.00 9 $2,250.00 161 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 162 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH $250.00 9 $2,250.00 163 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH $2,200.00 2 $4,400.00 164 2504.602 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH $300.00 9 $2,700.00 165 2504.602 HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH $5,500.00 3 $16,500.00 166 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE L F $32.00 360 $11,520.00 167 2504.603 6" WATER MAIN-DUCT IRON CL 52 W/ POLY WRAP L F $48.00 60 $2,880.00 168 2504.603 8" WATER MAIN-DUCT IRON CL 52 W/ POLY WRAP L F $52.00 500 $26,000.00 169 2504.604 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION S Y $45.00 100 $4,500.00 170 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND $5.00 1,000 $5,000.00 $93,150.00 $4,658.00 $97,808.00 $24,452.00 $122,260.00 + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE F - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS SILVER LAKE TERRACE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE F - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS + 5% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE F - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 125 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE G - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 171 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $500.00 3 $1,500.00 172 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)L F $10.00 200 $2,000.00 173 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV)C Y $40.00 97 $3,880.00 174 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V L F $44.00 200 $8,800.00 175 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V L F $52.00 900 $46,800.00 176 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH $1,200.00 1 $1,200.00 177 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 EACH $2,200.00 2 $4,400.00 178 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH $600.00 7 $4,200.00 179 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 L F $450.00 50 $22,500.00 $95,280.00 $9,528.00 $104,808.00 $26,202.00 $131,010.00 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 TOTAL SCHEDULE G - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 32ND AVENUE AND CROFT DRIVE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE G - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS + 10% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE G - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. 126 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE H - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 180 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 4 S Y $5.00 400 $2,000.00 181 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V L F $52.00 300 $15,600.00 182 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V L F $58.00 100 $5,800.00 183 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 EACH $2,500.00 2 $5,000.00 184 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM)EACH $750.00 4 $3,000.00 185 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 L F $550.00 30 $16,500.00 186 2507.503 18" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 187 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III C Y $200.00 10 $2,000.00 $50,900.00 $2,545.00 $53,445.00 $13,361.25 $66,806.25 + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. TOTAL SCHEDULE H - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SILVER LAKE TERRACE SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE H - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS + 5% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE H - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 127 No.Mat. No.Item Units Estimated Unit Price Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost SCHEDULE I - MILL AND OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS 188 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S $14,300.00 1 $14,300.00 189 2104.501 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER L F $35.00 1,400 $49,000.00 190 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING (SANITARY)EACH $250.00 2 $500.00 191 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y $8.00 700 $5,600.00 192 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $10.00 20 $200.00 193 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $10.00 20 $200.00 194 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $10.00 50 $500.00 195 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F $10.00 50 $500.00 196 2104.618 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL BRICK PAVER S F $25.00 80 $2,000.00 197 2231.501 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE TON $250.00 80 $20,000.00 198 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.75")S Y $5.00 7,600 $38,000.00 199 2331.501 JOINT ADHESIVE - MASTIC L F $1.00 4,900 $4,900.00 200 2331.601 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $45.00 20 $900.00 201 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON $5.00 800 $4,000.00 202 2360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B)TON $80.00 1,000 $80,000.00 203 2503.602 CHIMNEY SEALS EACH $400.00 23 $9,200.00 204 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH $500.00 3 $1,500.00 205 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY)EACH $750.00 2 $1,500.00 206 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)EACH $500.00 21 $10,500.00 207 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y $92.00 20 $1,840.00 208 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 209 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $250.00 5 $1,250.00 210 2582.501 4" SOLID LINE - EPOXY L F $1.00 4900 $4,900.00 211 2582.501 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE EPOXY L F $2.00 2500 $5,000.00 212 2582.501 CROSSWALK S F $10.00 300 $3,000.00 $264,290.00 $13,214.50 $277,504.50 $69,377.00 $346,881.50TOTAL SCHEDULE I - MILL AND OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE I - MILL AND OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS + 5% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE I - MILL AND OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS + 25% ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, ETC. SILVER LANE OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. R-011648-000 ST ANTHONY, MN APRIL 9, 2019 128 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project Amendment to the Feasibility Report CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 9, 2019 2020 Street and Utility Improvement Project •Croft Drive •32nd Avenue •Silver Lake Terrace 129 2020 Mill and Overlay Improvement Project •Silver Lane Completed in 2021 with final wear coarse paving on Silver Lake Terrace 2020 Project Costs and Funding Street Improvements $388,100 $863,800 $1,251,900 Sanitary Sewer Improvement $0 $267,600 $267,600 Water Main Improvements $27,700 $354,300 $382,000 Storm Sewer Improvements $61,300 $136,500 $197,800 Mill and Overlay Improvements $0 $346,900 $346,900 Total $477,100 $1,969,100 $2,446,200 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT City of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota Proposed Improvements Special Assessments City Costs Total Project Funding from Public Improvement Bonds and Special Assessments to Benefitting Properties 130 Council Authorize Feasibility May 22,2018 (1st of 8 meetings) Council Accept Feasibility August 14, 2018 (2nd of 8 meetings) Council Work Session March 4,2019 (3rd of 8 meetings) Council Accept Amendment to Feasibility April 9, 2019 (4th of 8 meetings) 1st Public Info Meeting November 2019 (5th of 8 meetings) Council Approve Plans November 2019 (6th of 8 meetings) 2020 Project Schedule Receive Bids/Compute Assessments January 2020 2nd Public Info Meeting February 2020 (7th of 8 meetings) Public Hearing/Award Contract February 2020 (8th of 8 meetings) Award Sale of Bonds March 2020 Begin Construction May/June 2020 Substantial Completion September 2020 Final Paving & Silver Lane Overlay June 2021 2020 Project Schedule –cont’d 131 Email / Text Notifications Sign up to receive weekly email updates and notifications by visiting the project webpage located under the tab on the City’s website at http://www.savmn.com Questions 132 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RESOLUTION 19-031 A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE AMMENDED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2020 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution adopted May 22, 2019, the St. Anthony Village City Council directed WSB to prepare a Feasibility Report for the 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report for the 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvements prepared by WSB dated September 11, 2018, was determined necessary, cost effective and feasible; and WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report for the 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvements was accepted by the Council on September 11, 2018, Resolution No. 18-062; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the Feasibility Report for the 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvements was prepared by WSB, dated April 9, 2019, to address changes relating to project scope, phasing and cost; and WHEREAS, the amended Feasibility Report for the 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvements recommends the following street and utility improvements to be constructed in 2020: Street and Utility Reconstruction  32nd Avenue NE from Rankin Road to Croft Drive  Croft Drive from 32nd Avenue NE to 31st Avenue NE  Silver Lake Terrace from Silver Lane to the north cul-de-sac Bituminous Mill and Overlay Improvements  Silver Lane from Stinson Boulevard to Silver Lake Road WHEREAS, the amended report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village that: 1) The Council accepts the amended Feasibility Report for the 2019/2020 Street and Utility Improvements as prepared by WSB, dated April 9, 2019; 2) The Council will consider improvements in accordance with the amended Feasibility Report at an estimated total cost of $2,446,200 for the 2020 Street and Utility Improvements. 3) WSB is hereby designated as the engineer for the City improvements and shall prepare plans for making such improvements. 133 Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 134 K:\02170-420\Admin\Resolutions\LTR-hmcc-032919.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COMMarch 29, 2019 The Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff c/o Mark Casey, City Manager City of St. Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake Road NE St. Anthony Village, MN 55418-1603 Re:Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project City of St. Anthony Village, MN WSB Project No. 02170-420 Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff: Following this letter is a resolution for your consideration at the April 9, 2019, Council Meeting. This resolution orders the improvements for the Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project and awards the contract to the lowest bidder. A tabulation of these bidders, showing the low bidder as Lametti and Sons, Inc. with a bid amount of $667,870.00, can be seen in the Council packet. If you have any questions, I will be present at the April 9, 2019, Council Meeting or available at 651.286.8465 to discuss. Sincerely, W SB Justin Messner, PE Assistant City Engineer Attachments 135 1/30/2019 WSBProject Bid AbstractProject Name: STAN - Silver Lake RoadFlooding AnalysisS.A.P. No.: 062-644-037 Project No.: 02170-42Client: City of St. Anthony Village Bid Opening: 01/30/2019 10:00 AMOwner: St. Anthony Village, MNProject: 02170-42 - STAN - Silver Lake Road Flooding Analysis Engineers Estimate Lametti & Sons, Inc. G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. New Look Contracting,Inc. Line No. Item Units QuantityUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceSilver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1$25,900.00$25,900.00$25,000.00$25,000.00$35,830.00$35,830.00$25,000.00$25,000.002 2101.524 CLEARING TREE 5$500.00$2,500.00$300.00$1,500.00$440.00$2,200.00$500.00$2,500.003 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE 5$500.00$2,500.00$300.00$1,500.00$220.00$1,100.00$500.00$2,500.004 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 4$650.00$2,600.00$50.00$200.00$690.00$2,760.00$725.00$2,900.005 2104.502 REMOVE HANDHOLE EACH 1$500.00$500.00$100.00$100.00$850.00$850.00$850.00$850.006 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT L F 40$8.00$320.00$7.00$280.00$8.50$340.00$5.00$200.007 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L F 2100$4.00$8,400.00$2.00$4,200.00$2.15$4,515.00$2.50$5,250.008 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F 30$15.00$450.00$10.00$300.00$18.00$540.00$75.00$2,250.009 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) L F 90$15.00$1,350.00$5.00$450.00$11.00$990.00$25.00$2,250.0010 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB L F 400$8.00$3,200.00$2.00$800.00$5.00$2,000.00$4.75$1,900.0011 2104.503 REMOVE FORCE MAIN L F 100$50.00$5,000.00$10.00$1,000.00$18.00$1,800.00$150.00$15,000.0012 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 2800$8.00$22,400.00$4.00$11,200.00$4.00$11,200.00$5.25$14,700.0013 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 1000$6.00$6,000.00$1.00$1,000.00$1.00$1,000.00$2.00$2,000.0014 2104.603 ABANDON STORM SEWER L F 50$14.00$700.00$35.00$1,750.00$28.00$1,400.00$35.00$1,750.0015 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION C Y 900$22.00$19,800.00$11.00$9,900.00$29.00$26,100.00$18.00$16,200.0016 2112.601 SUBGRADE PREPERATION (SPECIAL) ROAD STA 9$250.00$2,250.00$750.00$6,750.00$415.00$3,735.00$225.00$2,025.0017 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 40$140.00$5,600.00$100.00$4,000.00$47.00$1,880.00$125.00$5,000.0018 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y 900$35.00$31,500.00$30.00$27,000.00$32.00$28,800.00$35.00$31,500.0019 2331.603 JOINT ADHESIVE L F 400$1.00$400.00$1.00$400.00$1.00$400.00$3.75$1,500.0020 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 200$5.00$1,000.00$3.00$600.00$4.90$980.00$6.00$1,200.0021 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (4;C) TON 700$72.00$50,400.00$100.00$70,000.00$95.00$66,500.00$100.00$70,000.0022 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (4;F) TON 500$75.00$37,500.00$100.00$50,000.00$100.00$50,000.00$105.00$52,500.0023 2411.502 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL EACH 1$10,000.00$10,000.00$52,470.00$52,470.00$54,650.00$54,650.00$10,000.00$10,000.0024 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV) C Y 200$25.00$5,000.00$25.00$5,000.00$37.00$7,400.00$75.00$15,000.00Page 1 of 702170-42 - Project Bid AbstractDenotes Corrected Figure136 Project: 02170-42 - STAN - Silver Lake Road Flooding Analysis Engineers Estimate Lametti & Sons, Inc. G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. New Look Contracting, Inc. Line No. Item Units QuantityUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal Price25 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 110$75.00$8,250.00$130.00$14,300.00$73.00$8,030.00$73.00$8,030.0026 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 890$80.00$71,200.00$175.00$155,750.00$126.00$112,140.00$130.00$115,700.0027 2503.602 CONSTRUCT BULKHEAD EACH 1$500.00$500.00$400.00$400.00$1,400.00$1,400.00$550.00$550.0028 2503.602 CONCRETE SADDLE EACH 1$2,500.00$2,500.00$750.00$750.00$1,875.00$1,875.00$1,600.00$1,600.0029 2504.602 WATERMAIN OFFSET EACH 1$8,000.00$8,000.00$10,000.00$10,000.00$5,900.00$5,900.00$8,000.00$8,000.0030 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION L S 1$1,500.00$1,500.00$2,500.00$2,500.00$3,200.00$3,200.00$3,000.00$3,000.0031 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 7$700.00$4,900.00$1,500.00$10,500.00$2,980.00$20,860.00$2,200.00$15,400.0032 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 22$750.00$16,500.00$525.00$11,550.00$595.00$13,090.00$725.00$15,950.0033 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 72-4020 L F 20$900.00$18,000.00$1,080.00$21,600.00$1,265.00$25,300.00$1,350.00$27,000.0034 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 84-4020 L F 14$1,250.00$17,500.00$1,010.00$14,140.00$1,480.00$20,720.00$1,350.00$18,900.0035 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 2 EACH 4$10,000.00$40,000.00$5,000.00$20,000.00$8,740.00$34,960.00$9,500.00$38,000.0036 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 3 EACH 1$75,000.00$75,000.00$60,000.00$60,000.00$96,245.00$96,245.00$120,000.00$120,000.0037 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK S F 700$10.00$7,000.00$8.00$5,600.00$8.00$5,600.00$12.00$8,400.0038 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL S F 200$25.00$5,000.00$15.00$3,000.00$20.00$4,000.00$23.00$4,600.0039 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 400$32.00$12,800.00$30.00$12,000.00$43.00$17,200.00$35.00$14,000.0040 2531.503 CONCRETE MEDIAN (NOSE) S Y 50$100.00$5,000.00$81.00$4,050.00$150.00$7,500.00$115.00$5,750.0041 2550.502 HANDHOLE TYPE PVC METAL FRAME EACH 1$500.00$500.00$1,500.00$1,500.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$1,100.00$1,100.0042 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1$10,000.00$10,000.00$15,000.00$15,000.00$17,800.00$17,800.00$12,000.00$12,000.0043 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6' EACH 5$2,500.00$12,500.00$2,500.00$12,500.00$1,200.00$6,000.00$1,200.00$6,000.0044 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X15' EACH 2$3,500.00$7,000.00$2,500.00$5,000.00$1,400.00$2,800.00$1,400.00$2,800.0045 2571.524 DECIDUOUS TREE 3" CAL B&B TREE 5$650.00$3,250.00$650.00$3,250.00$595.00$2,975.00$600.00$3,000.0046 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1$2,000.00$2,000.00$1,800.00$1,800.00$1,260.00$1,260.00$800.00$800.0047 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 12$150.00$1,800.00$100.00$1,200.00$200.00$2,400.00$250.00$3,000.0048 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE MS L F 100$3.00$300.00$3.00$300.00$3.30$330.00$5.00$500.0049 2573.503 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE STILL WATER L F 100$10.00$1,000.00$15.00$1,500.00$14.00$1,400.00$17.00$1,700.0050 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST L F 200$5.00$1,000.00$3.00$600.00$4.50$900.00$3.50$700.0051 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 30$32.00$960.00$30.00$900.00$38.00$1,140.00$100.00$3,000.0052 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 LB 10$5.00$50.00$3.00$30.00$11.00$110.00$5.00$50.0053 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3N S Y 200$5.00$1,000.00$2.00$400.00$4.00$800.00$5.00$1,000.0054 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 200$5.00$1,000.00$2.00$400.00$3.00$600.00$5.00$1,000.0055 2575.505 SEEDING ACRE 0.03$25,000.00$750.00$5,000.00$150.00$13,000.00$390.00$11,500.00$345.0056 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-131 LB 10$10.00$100.00$5.00$50.00$10.00$100.00$10.00$100.0057 2575.523 WATER MGAL 10$25.00$250.00$100.00$1,000.00$125.00$1,250.00$110.00$1,100.0058 2575.601 TURF ESTABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE L S 1$5,000.00$5,000.00$750.00$750.00$2,650.00$2,650.00$3,000.00$3,000.00Total Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project: $587,380.00 $667,870.00 $728,895.00 $730,050.00Page 2 of 702170-42 - Project Bid Abstract137 Project: 02170-42 - STAN - Silver Lake Road Flooding Analysis Engineers Estimate Lametti & Sons, Inc. G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. New Look Contracting, Inc. Line No. Item Units QuantityUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceTotal Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project: $587,380.00 $667,870.00 $728,895.00 $730,050.00 Totals for Project 02170-42 $587,380.00 $667,870.00 $728,895.00 $730,050.00 % of Estimate for Project 02170-42 13.70% 24.09% 24.29%Page 3 of 702170-42 - Project Bid Abstract138 Project: 02170-42 - STAN - Silver Lake Road Flooding Analysis Engineers Estimate Rachel Contracting, Inc. Minger ConstructionCompanies, Inc. Park Construction Company - Mpls Line No. Item Units QuantityUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceSilver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1$25,900.00$25,900.00$27,500.00$27,500.00$40,500.00$40,500.00$77,000.00$77,000.002 2101.524 CLEARING TREE 5$500.00$2,500.00$344.50$1,722.50$556.50$2,782.50$692.00$3,460.003 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE 5$500.00$2,500.00$344.50$1,722.50$556.50$2,782.50$277.00$1,385.004 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 4$650.00$2,600.00$605.50$2,422.00$288.50$1,154.00$990.00$3,960.005 2104.502 REMOVE HANDHOLE EACH 1$500.00$500.00$954.50$954.50$835.00$835.00$1,200.00$1,200.006 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT L F 40$8.00$320.00$9.10$364.00$8.35$334.00$8.55$342.007 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L F 2100$4.00$8,400.00$2.30$4,830.00$2.05$4,305.00$2.10$4,410.008 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F 30$15.00$450.00$25.50$765.00$24.10$723.00$28.50$855.009 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) L F 90$15.00$1,350.00$18.50$1,665.00$22.25$2,002.50$29.90$2,691.0010 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB L F 400$8.00$3,200.00$5.50$2,200.00$3.60$1,440.00$4.75$1,900.0011 2104.503 REMOVE FORCE MAIN L F 100$50.00$5,000.00$48.90$4,890.00$50.60$5,060.00$28.50$2,850.0012 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 2800$8.00$22,400.00$6.40$17,920.00$7.05$19,740.00$5.55$15,540.0013 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 1000$6.00$6,000.00$1.00$1,000.00$3.65$3,650.00$2.65$2,650.0014 2104.603 ABANDON STORM SEWER L F 50$14.00$700.00$31.40$1,570.00$39.45$1,972.50$39.20$1,960.0015 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION C Y 900$22.00$19,800.00$21.45$19,305.00$26.20$23,580.00$24.00$21,600.0016 2112.601 SUBGRADE PREPERATION (SPECIAL) ROAD STA 9$250.00$2,250.00$1,370.00$12,330.00$2,461.00$22,149.00$583.00$5,247.0017 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 40$140.00$5,600.00$155.00$6,200.00$167.00$6,680.00$138.00$5,520.0018 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y 900$35.00$31,500.00$36.80$33,120.00$53.15$47,835.00$44.90$40,410.0019 2331.603 JOINT ADHESIVE L F 400$1.00$400.00$2.60$1,040.00$3.50$1,400.00$2.35$940.0020 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 200$5.00$1,000.00$5.75$1,150.00$5.35$1,070.00$7.70$1,540.0021 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (4;C) TON 700$72.00$50,400.00$103.84$72,688.00$96.65$67,655.00$107.00$74,900.0022 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (4;F) TON 500$75.00$37,500.00$108.04$54,020.00$100.50$50,250.00$103.00$51,500.0023 2411.502 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL EACH 1$10,000.00$10,000.00$66,500.00$66,500.00$65,000.00$65,000.00$100,600.00$100,600.0024 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV) C Y 200$25.00$5,000.00$48.60$9,720.00$72.45$14,490.00$78.00$15,600.0025 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 110$75.00$8,250.00$120.50$13,255.00$98.55$10,840.50$125.00$13,750.0026 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 890$80.00$71,200.00$189.54$168,690.60$189.50$168,655.00$178.00$158,420.0027 2503.602 CONSTRUCT BULKHEAD EACH 1$500.00$500.00$308.50$308.50$1,624.50$1,624.50$474.00$474.0028 2503.602 CONCRETE SADDLE EACH 1$2,500.00$2,500.00$3,090.00$3,090.00$982.50$982.50$1,790.00$1,790.0029 2504.602 WATERMAIN OFFSET EACH 1$8,000.00$8,000.00$6,510.00$6,510.00$5,797.50$5,797.50$5,970.00$5,970.0030 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION L S 1$1,500.00$1,500.00$3,670.00$3,670.00$556.50$556.50$1,000.00$1,000.0031 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 7$700.00$4,900.00$810.00$5,670.00$3,429.00$24,003.00$1,760.00$12,320.0032 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 22$750.00$16,500.00$676.50$14,883.00$593.00$13,046.00$678.00$14,916.0033 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 72-4020 L F 20$900.00$18,000.00$1,670.00$33,400.00$1,001.00$20,020.00$1,550.00$31,000.0034 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 84-4020 L F 14$1,250.00$17,500.00$1,110.00$15,540.00$1,011.00$14,154.00$2,490.00$34,860.00Page 4 of 702170-42 - Project Bid Abstract139 Project: 02170-42 - STAN - Silver Lake Road Flooding Analysis Engineers Estimate Rachel Contracting, Inc. Minger ConstructionCompanies, Inc. Park Construction Company - Mpls Line No. Item Units QuantityUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal Price35 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 2 EACH 4$10,000.00$40,000.00$9,050.00$36,200.00$4,263.00$17,052.00$10,400.00$41,600.0036 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 3 EACH 1$75,000.00$75,000.00$95,500.00$95,500.00$82,000.00$82,000.00$87,400.00$87,400.0037 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK S F 700$10.00$7,000.00$8.20$5,740.00$7.65$5,355.00$10.40$7,280.0038 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL S F 200$25.00$5,000.00$17.10$3,420.00$15.90$3,180.00$18.40$3,680.0039 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 400$32.00$12,800.00$34.80$13,920.00$32.40$12,960.00$36.30$14,520.0040 2531.503 CONCRETE MEDIAN (NOSE) S Y 50$100.00$5,000.00$97.00$4,850.00$90.15$4,507.50$196.00$9,800.0041 2550.502 HANDHOLE TYPE PVC METAL FRAME EACH 1$500.00$500.00$1,150.00$1,150.00$1,002.00$1,002.00$2,340.00$2,340.0042 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1$10,000.00$10,000.00$12,100.00$12,100.00$21,000.00$21,000.00$10,100.00$10,100.0043 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6' EACH 5$2,500.00$12,500.00$1,340.00$6,700.00$1,168.50$5,842.50$1,740.00$8,700.0044 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X15' EACH 2$3,500.00$7,000.00$1,500.00$3,000.00$1,308.00$2,616.00$2,000.00$4,000.0045 2571.524 DECIDUOUS TREE 3" CAL B&B TREE 5$650.00$3,250.00$750.50$3,752.50$890.50$4,452.50$1,020.00$5,100.0046 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1$2,000.00$2,000.00$2,520.00$2,520.00$1,663.00$1,663.00$7,230.00$7,230.0047 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 12$150.00$1,800.00$168.00$2,016.00$139.00$1,668.00$343.00$4,116.0048 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE MS L F 100$3.00$300.00$6.00$600.00$3.60$360.00$3.15$315.0049 2573.503 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE STILL WATER L F 100$10.00$1,000.00$17.50$1,750.00$22.25$2,225.00$26.40$2,640.0050 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST L F 200$5.00$1,000.00$3.40$680.00$3.60$720.00$4.75$950.0051 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 30$32.00$960.00$57.30$1,719.00$95.85$2,875.50$118.00$3,540.0052 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 LB 10$5.00$50.00$3.60$36.00$0.55$5.50$1.05$10.5053 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3N S Y 200$5.00$1,000.00$1.50$300.00$3.90$780.00$2.65$530.0054 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 200$5.00$1,000.00$1.80$360.00$3.90$780.00$2.65$530.0055 2575.505 SEEDING ACRE 0.03$25,000.00$750.00$6,030.00$180.90$1,113.00$33.39$10,600.00$318.0056 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-131 LB 10$10.00$100.00$5.10$51.00$3.05$30.50$7.40$74.0057 2575.523 WATER MGAL 10$25.00$250.00$120.50$1,205.00$223.00$2,230.00$51.00$510.0058 2575.601 TURF ESTABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE L S 1$5,000.00$5,000.00$904.00$904.00$1,113.00$1,113.00$3,690.00$3,690.00Total Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project: $587,380.00 $809,270.00 $821,520.89 $931,533.50 Total Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project: $587,380.00 $809,270.00 $821,520.89 $931,533.50 Totals for Project 02170-42 $587,380.00 $809,270.00 $821,520.89 $931,533.50 % of Estimate for Project 02170-42 37.78% 39.86% 58.59%Page 5 of 702170-42 - Project Bid Abstract140 Project: 02170-42 - STAN - Silver Lake Road Flooding Analysis Engineers Estimate Astech Corp. Line No. Item Units QuantityUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal PriceSilver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1$25,900.00$25,900.00$82,995.00$82,995.002 2101.524 CLEARING TREE 5$500.00$2,500.00$486.00$2,430.003 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE 5$500.00$2,500.00$432.00$2,160.004 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 4$650.00$2,600.00$745.00$2,980.005 2104.502 REMOVE HANDHOLE EACH 1$500.00$500.00$500.00$500.006 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT L F 40$8.00$320.00$7.70$308.007 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L F 2100$4.00$8,400.00$3.00$6,300.008 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F 30$15.00$450.00$19.44$583.209 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) L F 90$15.00$1,350.00$12.10$1,089.0010 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB L F 400$8.00$3,200.00$5.00$2,000.0011 2104.503 REMOVE FORCE MAIN L F 100$50.00$5,000.00$19.50$1,950.0012 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 2800$8.00$22,400.00$4.65$13,020.0013 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 1000$6.00$6,000.00$1.00$1,000.0014 2104.603 ABANDON STORM SEWER L F 50$14.00$700.00$30.24$1,512.0015 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION C Y 900$22.00$19,800.00$25.00$22,500.0016 2112.601 SUBGRADE PREPERATION (SPECIAL) ROAD STA 9$250.00$2,250.00$330.00$2,970.0017 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 40$140.00$5,600.00$165.00$6,600.0018 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y 900$35.00$31,500.00$39.75$35,775.0019 2331.603 JOINT ADHESIVE L F 400$1.00$400.00$1.45$580.0020 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 200$5.00$1,000.00$3.00$600.0021 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (4;C) TON 700$72.00$50,400.00$86.20$60,340.0022 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (4;F) TON 500$75.00$37,500.00$88.78$44,390.0023 2411.502 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL EACH 1$10,000.00$10,000.00$150,000.00$150,000.0024 2451.507 COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (LV) C Y 200$25.00$5,000.00$37.00$7,400.0025 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 110$75.00$8,250.00$76.00$8,360.0026 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 890$80.00$71,200.00$136.00$121,040.0027 2503.602 CONSTRUCT BULKHEAD EACH 1$500.00$500.00$1,540.00$1,540.0028 2503.602 CONCRETE SADDLE EACH 1$2,500.00$2,500.00$2,025.00$2,025.0029 2504.602 WATERMAIN OFFSET EACH 1$8,000.00$8,000.00$6,400.00$6,400.0030 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION L S 1$1,500.00$1,500.00$2,500.00$2,500.0031 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 7$700.00$4,900.00$2,530.00$17,710.0032 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 L F 22$750.00$16,500.00$650.00$14,300.0033 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 72-4020 L F 20$900.00$18,000.00$1,370.00$27,400.0034 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 84-4020 L F 14$1,250.00$17,500.00$1,600.00$22,400.00Page 6 of 702170-42 - Project Bid Abstract141 Project: 02170-42 - STAN - Silver Lake Road Flooding Analysis Engineers Estimate Astech Corp. Line No. Item Units QuantityUnit PriceTotal PriceUnit PriceTotal Price35 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 2 EACH 4$10,000.00$40,000.00$37,800.00$151,200.0036 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC 3 EACH 1$75,000.00$75,000.00$104,750.00$104,750.0037 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK S F 700$10.00$7,000.00$7.50$5,250.0038 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL S F 200$25.00$5,000.00$15.70$3,140.0039 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 400$32.00$12,800.00$31.50$12,600.0040 2531.503 CONCRETE MEDIAN (NOSE) S Y 50$100.00$5,000.00$93.50$4,675.0041 2550.502 HANDHOLE TYPE PVC METAL FRAME EACH 1$500.00$500.00$2,800.00$2,800.0042 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1$10,000.00$10,000.00$10,800.00$10,800.0043 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6' EACH 5$2,500.00$12,500.00$1,650.00$8,250.0044 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X15' EACH 2$3,500.00$7,000.00$1,750.00$3,500.0045 2571.524 DECIDUOUS TREE 3" CAL B&B TREE 5$650.00$3,250.00$850.00$4,250.0046 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1$2,000.00$2,000.00$2,000.00$2,000.0047 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 12$150.00$1,800.00$250.00$3,000.0048 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE MS L F 100$3.00$300.00$5.00$500.0049 2573.503 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE STILL WATER L F 100$10.00$1,000.00$30.00$3,000.0050 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST L F 200$5.00$1,000.00$3.00$600.0051 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 30$32.00$960.00$38.00$1,140.0052 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 LB 10$5.00$50.00$10.00$100.0053 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3N S Y 200$5.00$1,000.00$3.50$700.0054 2575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 S Y 200$5.00$1,000.00$7.50$1,500.0055 2575.505 SEEDING ACRE 0.03$25,000.00$750.00$38,000.00$1,140.0056 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-131 LB 10$10.00$100.00$27.50$275.0057 2575.523 WATER MGAL 10$25.00$250.00$45.00$450.0058 2575.601 TURF ESTABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE L S 1$5,000.00$5,000.00$18,000.00$18,000.00Total Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project: $587,380.00 $1,017,277.20 Total Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project: $587,380.00 $1,017,277.20 Totals for Project 02170-42 $587,380.00 $1,017,277.20 % of Estimate for Project 02170-42 73.19%I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received.Certified By: _______________________________ License No. ________Date: __________Page 7 of 702170-42 - Project Bid Abstract45857January 30, 2019142 Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 9, 2019 Project Location Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Silver Lake Road from 250 feet south of Silver Lane to approximately 600 feet north of Silver Lane 143 Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project Cooperative Project •Ramsey County •Rice Creek Watershed District •Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Flood Reduction •Alleviate flooding along the east side of Silver Lake Road •Reduce flooding downstream (Penrod Lane, Silver Lane, Fordham Drive, Shamrock Drive, 39th Avenue, and Foss) Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project Improvements •Installation of new 36-inch trunk storm sewer (east side) to supplement existing 66-inch trunk storm sewer (west side) •Installation within the northbound lanes of Silver Lake Road •South bound traffic to continue as normal •North bound traffic detour •Installation of additional catch basins at the low point on Silver Lake Road (approximately 250 feet south of Silver Lane) 144 Bids Received –January 30, 2019 (Construction Costs) 7 Bids Received $667,870.00 -$1,017,277.20 Low Bid: Lametti and Sons, Inc.$667,870.00 Project Costs / Funding Breakdown Construction Costs Contingency Costs Engineering Costs Total Project Cost = $157,000 $50,000 $355,000 $90,000 $265,870 $917,870Total Project Funding = Project Cost $667,870 $75,000 $175,000 $917,870 Ramsey County Rice Creek Watershed District MN DNR BWSR City of St. Anthony Village Funding Source Silver Lake Road Flood Reduction Project City of St. Anthony Village, Minnesota 145 Council Authorize Feasibility May 22,2018 (1st of 5 meetings) Council Accept Feasibility September 11, 2018 (2nd of 5 meetings) Council Approve Plans December 11, 2018 (3rd of 5 meetings) Receive Bids January 30, 2019 (4th of 5 meetings) Order Project & Award Contract April 9, 2019 (5th of 5 meetings) Begin Construction April/May 2019 Substantial Completion July 2019 Project Schedule Email / Text Notifications Sign up to receive weekly email updates and notifications by visiting the project webpage located under the tab on the City’s website at http://www.savmn.com 146 Questions 147 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 148 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-032 A RESOLUTION AWARDING A BID AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SILVER LAKE ROAD FLOOD REUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvements as shown on the plan for the flood reduction improvements on Silver Lake Road from approximately 250 feet south of Silver Lane to approximately 600 feet north of Silver Lane, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Total Bid 1 Lametti and Sons, Inc. $667,870.00 2 G. F. Jedlicki, Inc.$728,895.00 3 New Look Contracting, Inc. $730,050.00 4 Rachel Contracting, Inc. $809,270.00 5 Minger Construction Companies, Inc. $821,520.89 6 Park Construction Company $931,533.50 7 Asphalt Surface Technologies (Astech) Corp. $1,017,277.20 WHEREAS, it appears that Lametti and Sons, Inc. of Hugo, MN is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village approve such improvements as are hereby ordered in the Council Resolution. BE IT RESOLVED, that: 1.The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $667,870.00 in the name of the City of St. Anthony Village, Minnesota for the improvement outlined in the above- referenced project according to the plans and specifications, therefore, approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2.The Engineer, WSB, is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 149 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 150 K:\012564-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-hmcc-040919.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COMMarch 29, 2019 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff c/o Mark Casey, City Manager City of St. Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake Road NE St. Anthony, MN 55418 Re:ADA Transition Plan for the Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way St. Anthony Village, MN WSB Project No. R-012564-000 Dear Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Staff: We are pleased to present to you the attached ADA Transition Plan for the Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way. Attached for your consideration is a resolution approving the transition plan. I am available to answer your questions at your April 9, 2019, Council meeting or you may call me at 651.286.8465. Sincerely, W SB Justin Messner, PE Assistant City Engineer Attachments 151 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 152 ADA TRANSITION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE 3301 SILVER LAKE ROAD APRIL 2019 153 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION A. TRANSITION PLAN NEED AND PURPOSE The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted on July 26, 1990, is a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. ADA consists of five titles outlining protections in the following areas: 1. Employment 2. State and local government services 3. Public accommodations 4. Telecommunications 5. Miscellaneous provisions Title II of ADA pertains to the programs, activities and services public entities provide. As a provider of public transportation services and programs, the City of Saint Anthony Village must comply with this section of the Act as it specifically applies to public service agencies. Title II of ADA provides that, “…no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.” (42 USC. Sec. 12132; 28 CFR. Sec. 35.130) As required by Title II of ADA, 28 CFR. Part 35 Sec. 35.105 and Sec. 35.150, the City of Saint Anthony Village has conducted a self-evaluation of its facilities within public rights of way and has developed this Transition Plan detailing how the organization will ensure that all those facilities are accessible to all individuals. B. ADA AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAWS Title II of ADA is companion legislation to two previous federal statutes and regulations: the Architectural Barriers Acts of 1968 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 is a Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a Federal law that protects qualified individuals from discrimination based on their disability. The nondiscrimination requirements of the law apply to employers and organizations that receive financial assistance from any Federal department or agency. Title II of ADA extended this coverage to all state and local government entities, regardless of whether they receive federal funding or not. C. AGENCY REQUIREMENTS Under Title II, the City of Saint Anthony Village must meet these general requirements: • Must operate their programs so that, when viewed in their entirety, the programs are accessible to and useable by individuals with disabilities (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.150). • May not refuse to allow a person with a disability to participate in a service, program or activity simply because the person has a disability (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130 (a). 154 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Page 2 • Must make reasonable modifications in policies, practices and procedures that deny equal access to individuals with disabilities unless a fundamental alteration in the program would result (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b) (7). • May not provide services or benefits to individuals with disabilities through programs that are separate or different unless the separate or different measures are necessary to ensure that benefits and services are equally effective (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b)(iv) & (d). • Must take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, participants and members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others (29 C.F.R. Sec. 35.160(a). • Must designate at least one responsible employee to coordinate ADA compliance [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(a)]. This person is often referred to as the "ADA Coordinator." The public entity must provide the ADA coordinator's name, office address, and telephone number to all interested individuals [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(a)]. • Must provide notice of ADA requirements. All public entities, regardless of size, must provide information about the rights and protections of Title II to applicants, participants, beneficiaries, employees, and other interested persons [28 CFR Sec. 35,106]. The notice must include the identification of the employee serving as the ADA coordinator and must provide this information on an ongoing basis [28 CFR Sec. 104.8(a)]. • Must establish a grievance procedure. Public entities must adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(b)]. This requirement provides for a timely resolution of all problems or conflicts related to ADA compliance before they escalate to litigation and/or the federal complaint process. This document has been created to specifically cover accessibility within the public rights of way and does not include information on the City of Saint Anthony Village’s programs, practices, or building facilities not related to public rights of way. 155 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Page 3 2. SELF-EVALUATION A. OVERVIEW The City of Saint Anthony Village is required, under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and 28CFR35.105, to perform a self-evaluation of its current transportation infrastructure policies, practices, and programs. This self-evaluation will identify what policies and practices impact accessibility and examine how the City of Saint Anthony Village implements these policies. The goal of the self-evaluation is to verify that, in implementing the City of Saint Anthony Village’s policies and practices, the department is providing accessibility and not adversely affecting the full participation of individuals with disabilities. The self-evaluation also examines the condition of the City of Saint Anthony Village’s Pedestrian Circulation Route/Pedestrian Access Route) (PCR/PAR) and identifies potential need for PCR/PAR infrastructure improvements. This will include the sidewalks, curb ramps, bicycle/pedestrian trails and traffic control signals that are located within the City of Saint Anthony Village public rights of way. Any barriers to accessibility identified in the self-evaluation and the remedy to the identified barrier are set out in this transition plan. B. SUMMARY In September and November 2018, the City of Saint Anthony Village conducted an inventory (using available GIS data, aerial/street imagery, and on-site verification) of pedestrian facilities within the city-owned public rights of way consisting of the evaluation of the following facilities: • 7.5 miles of sidewalks • 172 curb ramps • 1 traffic control signal A summary of the inventory results on how facilities within the City’s public rights of way relate to ADA standards is found in Appendix A and will be updated periodically. ADA Transition Plan updates will occur periodically to incorporate the evaluation of other City services and programs into this document. 156 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Page 4 3. POLICIES AND PRACTICES A. PREVIOUS PRACTICES Since the adoption of the ADA, the City of Saint Anthony Village has striven to provide accessible pedestrian features as part of the City’s capital improvement projects. As additional information was made available as to the methods of providing accessible pedestrian features, the City of Saint Anthony Village updated their procedures to accommodate these methods. The City has led recent efforts to upgrade traffic signals and curb ramps for compliance with the ADA as part of a recent Highway Safety Improvement Program project. The City continues to explore opportunities to upgrade curb ramps and traffic signals at key intersections, including intersections along county roadways. B. POLICY The City of Saint Anthony Village’s goal is to continue to provide accessible pedestrian design features as part of the City’s capital improvement projects. The City of Saint Anthony Village has established ADA design standards and procedures as listed in Appendix F. These standards and procedures will be kept up to date with nationwide and local best management practices. The City will consider and respond to all accessibility improvement requests. All accessibility improvements that have been deemed reasonable will be scheduled consistent with transportation priorities. The City of Saint Anthony Village will coordinate with external agencies to ensure that all new or altered pedestrian facilities within the City of Saint Anthony Village jurisdiction are ADA compliant to the maximum extent feasible. Maintenance of pedestrian facilities within the public rights of way will continue to follow the policies set forth by the City of Saint Anthony Village. All City street reconstruction projects with pedestrian facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with the most current ADA guidance and design best practices to the maximum extent feasible. Requests for accessibility improvements can be submitted to the ADA Coordinator. Contact information for the ADA Coordinator is in Appendix B. 4. IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE A. PRIORITY AREAS The City of Saint Anthony Village has identified areas near public buildings/facilities, schools, and commercial centers as a priority for planned accessibility improvement projects. Additional priority will be given to any location where an improvement project or alteration was constructed after January 26, 1991, and accessibility features were omitted. B. EXTERNAL AGENCY COORDINATION Many other agencies are responsible for pedestrian facilities within the jurisdiction of the City of Saint Anthony Village, including Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Minneapolis Park Board, MnDOT, and Metro Transit. The City will coordinate with those agencies to track and assist in the facilitation of the elimination of accessibility barriers along their routes. 157 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Page 5 5. ADA COORDINATOR In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(a), the City of Saint Anthony Village has identified an ADA Title II Coordinator to oversee the City’s policies and procedures. Contact information for this individual is in Appendix B. 6. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The City of Saint Anthony Village will utilize two methods for upgrading pedestrian facilities to the current ADA standards. The first and most comprehensive of the two methods are the scheduled street and utility improvement projects. All pedestrian facilities impacted by these projects will be upgraded to current ADA accessibility standards. The second method is the stand-alone sidewalk and ADA accessibility improvement project. These projects may be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) on a case by case basis as determined by the City of Saint Anthony Village. The City CIP, which includes a detailed schedule and budget for specific improvements, is available on the City’s website at https://www.savmn.com/. The City also has an annual maintenance budget for sidewalk improvements that may be utilized as appropriate. 7. PUBLIC OUTREACH The City of Saint Anthony Village recognizes that public participation is an important component in the development of this document. Prior to officially adopting the plan, this document was made available online at the City’s website for public review and comment. The City notified the public through the City’s website and in future quarterly newsletters to encourage input from the community and help define priority areas for improvements within the jurisdiction of the City of Saint Anthony Village. Additional public outreach efforts will be provided as the City implements its plan and over time as improvements are made. 8. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, each agency is required to publish its responsibilities in regards to the ADA. A draft of this public notice is provided in Appendix D. If users of the City of Saint Anthony Village facilities and services believe the City has not provided reasonable accommodation, they have the right to file a grievance. In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(b), the City of Saint Anthony Village has developed a grievance procedure for the purpose of the prompt and equitable resolution of citizens’ complaints, concerns, comments, and other grievances. This grievance procedure is outlined in Appendix D. 9. MONITOR THE PROGRESS This document will continue to be updated periodically as conditions within the City evolve. A public comment period will be incorporated into each update should it be deemed necessary. 158 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendices APPENDICES A. SELF-EVALUATION RESULTS B. CONTACT INFORMATION C. PUBLIC OUTREACH D. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE E. BUDGET INFORMATION F. AGENCY ADA DESIGN STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES G. GLOSSARY OF TERMS 159 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix A APPENDIX A – SELF-EVALUATION RESULTS In September and November 2018, an inventory of curb ramps and sidewalks was performed using available GIS data, aerial/street imagery, and on-site verification. A total of 172 curb ramp locations and 7.5 miles of sidewalk facilities within City public rights of way were inventoried. Based upon this information, this initial self-evaluation of pedestrian facilities yielded the following results: • 73% of sidewalks met accessibility criteria • 16% of curb ramps met accessibility criteria • 16% of intersection locations did not have any curb ramps • 100% of traffic control signals had push buttons that are accessible, or had the pedestrian indications on recall Sidewalks: Pedestrian Curb Ramps: Condition Average Replacement Per Segment 0 - Bad 75.0%979 ft 245 ft 735 ft 1 - Poor 50.0%10,731 ft 5,366 ft 5,366 ft 2 - Fair 20.0%21,345 ft 17,076 ft 4,269 ft 3 - Good 5.0%6,619 ft 6,288 ft 331 ft 28,975 ft 39,676 ft 73%Percent OK Total Sidewalk Meets ADA Needs Need to Replace Meets ADA Needs Total Sidewalk Compliance Number of Curb Ramps Percent No curb ramp where one is needed 27 16% Not compliant 118 69% Compliant/recently updated 27 16% Total curb ramps 172 100% 160 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 0 1,000Feet ADA TRANSITION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYST. ANTHONY VILLAGE Existing Facilities Pedestrian Curb Ramps Sidewalks/Trails 161 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Curb Ramps - Compliance No curb ramp where one is needed Not compliant Recently updated/compliant 0 1,000Feet Inventory Results - Pedestrian Curb RampsADA TRANSITION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 162 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 0 1,000Feet Inventory Results - Sidewalks and Trails Sidewalks/Trails - Condition Bad Poor Fair Good ADA TRANSITION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 163 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 0 1,000Feet Inventory Results - Traffic Signals Traffic Signals - Compliance Not needed/not applicable No push buttons where needed Push buttons present, not APS APS, not compliant APS, compliant/recently updated ADA TRANSITION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYST. ANTHONY VILLAGE 164 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix B APPENDIX B – CONTACT INFORMATION 1. ADA TITLE II COORDINATOR Name: Mark Casey, City Manager Address: 3301 Silver Lake Road Saint Anthony Village, MN 55418 Phone: 612-782-3301 E-mail: mark.casey@savmn.com 2. PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY ADA IMPLEMENTATION COORDINATOR Name: Jay Hartman, Director of Public Works Address: 3301 Silver Lake Road Saint Anthony Village, MN 55418 Phone: 612-782-3314 E-mail: jay.hartman@savmn.com 165 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix C APPENDIX C – PUBLIC OUTREACH The draft ADA Transition Plan was available on the City website for a 30-day review period. The City will notify the public through the City’s website and in future quarterly newsletters to encourage input from the community and comments directed to the ADA Coordinator. Additional public outreach efforts will be provided as the City implements its plan and over time as improvements are made. 166 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix D APPENDIX D – GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE As part of the ADA requirements the City has posted the following notice outlining its ADA requirements: 1. PUBLIC NOTICE In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, The City of Saint Anthony Village will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in the City’s services, programs, or activities. Employment: The City of Saint Anthony Village does not discriminate on the basis of disability in its hiring or employment practices and complies with all regulations promulgated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Effective Communication: The City of Saint Anthony Village will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities so they can participate equally in the City’s programs, services, and activities, including qualified sign language interpreters, documents in Braille, and other ways of making information and communications accessible to people who have speech, hearing, or vision impairments. Modifications to Policies and Procedures: The City of Saint Anthony Village will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all City programs, services, and activities. For example, individuals with service animals are welcomed in City offices, even where pets are generally prohibited. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to participate in a City of Saint Anthony Village program, service, or activity, should contact the office of the City’s ADA Coordinator, as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event. The ADA does not require the City of Saint Anthony Village to take any action that would fundamentally alter the nature of its programs or services, or impose an undue financial or administrative burden. The City of Saint Anthony Village will not place a surcharge on a particular individual with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover the cost of providing auxiliary aids/services or reasonable modifications of policy, such as retrieving items from locations that are open to the public but are not accessible to persons who use wheelchairs. 167 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix D 2. CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT This Grievance Procedure is established to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"). It may be used by anyone who wishes to file a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of services, activities, programs, or benefits by the City of Saint Anthony Village. The City's Personnel Policy governs employment-related complaints of disability discrimination. The complaint should be in writing and contain information about the alleged discrimination such as name, address, phone number of complainant and location, date, and description of the problem. Alternative means of filing complaints, such as personal interviews or a tape recording of the complaint, will be made available for persons with disabilities upon request. The complaint should be submitted by the grievant and/or his/her designee as soon as possible but no later than 60 calendar days after the alleged violation. To file an ADA complaint online: Online Complaint Form @ https://www.savmn.com/FormCenter Instructions for submitting attachments are on the form. To file an ADA complaint by mail: Mark Casey, City Manager ADA Coordinator 3301 Silver Lake Road Saint Anthony Village, MN 55418 Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the complaint, the ADA Coordinator or assigned designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and the possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days of the meeting, the ADA Coordinator or assigned designee will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, such as large print, Braille, or audio tape. The response will explain the position of the City of Saint Anthony Village and offer options for substantive resolution of the complaint. If the response by the ADA Coordinator or assigned designee does not satisfactorily resolve the issue, the complainant and/or his/her designee may appeal the decision within 15 calendar days after receipt of the response to the City Manager or assigned designee. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the appeal, the City Manager or assigned designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the City Manager or assigned designee will respond in writing, and, where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, with a final resolution of the complaint. All written complaints received by the ADA Coordinator or assigned designee, appeals to the City Manager or assigned designee, and responses from these two offices will be retained by the City of Saint Anthony Village for at least seven years. 168 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix D Complaints of Title II violations may also be filed with the DOJ within 180 days of the date of discrimination. In certain situations, cases may be referred to a mediation program sponsored by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ may bring a lawsuit where it has investigated a matter and has been unable to resolve violations. For more information, contact: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Disability Rights Section - NYAV Washington, D.C. 20530 www.ada.gov (800) 514-0301 (voice – toll free) (800) 514-0383 (TTY) Title II may also be enforced through private lawsuits in Federal court. It is not necessary to file a complaint with the DOJ or any other Federal agency, or to receive a "right-to-sue" letter, before going to court. 169 Saint Anthony Village ADA Grievance Form Page 1 City of Saint Anthony Village Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Discrimination Complaint Form Instructions: Please fill out this form completely, in black ink or type. Sign and return to the address on page 3. Complainant: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________ City, State and Zip Code: _______________________________________________________________ Telephone:___________________________________________________________________________ Home: ______________________________________________________________________________ Business: ____________________________________________________________________________ Person Discriminated Against (if other than the complainant): __________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________ City, State, and Zip Code: _______________________________________________________________ Telephone: Home: ________________________ Business: _______________________________ Government, or organization, or institution which you believe has discriminated Name: ______________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________ County: _____________________________________________________________________________ City, State and Zip Code: _______________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________________________________________________________ 170 Saint Anthony Village ADA Grievance Form Page 2 When did the discrimination occur? ______________________________ Date: __________________ Describe the acts of discrimination providing the name(s) where possible of the individuals who discriminated (use space on page 3 if necessary): Have efforts been made to resolve this complaint through the internal grievance procedure of the government, organization, or institution? Yes ______ No _____ If yes: what is the status of the grievance? Has the complaint been filed with another bureau of the Department of Justice or any other Federal, State, or local civil rights agency or court? Yes ______ No _____ If yes: Agency or Court:______________________________________________________________________ Contact Person: _______________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________ City, State, and Zip Code: _______________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________________________________________________________ Date Filed: ___________________________________________________________________________ 171 Saint Anthony Village ADA Grievance Form Page 3 Do you intend to file with another agency or court? Yes______ No______ Agency or Court:______________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________ City, State and Zip Code: _______________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________________________________________________________ Additional space for answers: Signature: ___________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ Return to: ADA Coordinator 3301 Silver Lake Road Saint Anthony, MN 55418 172 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix E APPENDIX E – BUDGET INFORMATION 1. UNIT PRICES Construction costs for upgrading facilities can vary depending on each individual improvement and conditions of each site. Costs can also vary on the type and size of project the improvements are associated with. Listed below are representative 2018 costs for some typical accessibility improvements based on if the improvements are included as part of a retrofit type project, or as part of a larger comprehensive capital improvement project. Intersection corner ADA improvement retrofit: +/- $4,000 per corner Intersection corner ADA improvement as part of adjacent capital project: +/- $1,500 per corner Traffic control signal APS upgrade retrofit: +/-$ 15,000 Traffic control signal APS upgrade as part of full traffic control signal installation: +/- $10,000 Sidewalk / Trail ADA improvement retrofit: +/- $5.00 per SF Sidewalk / Trail ADA improvement as part of adjacent capital project: +/- $3.50 per SF 2. ESTIMATED COSTS Based on the results of the self-evaluation, the estimated costs associated with providing ADA accessibility for facilities within the City public rights of way is $890,000. This amount is significant, and the City of Saint Anthony Village will work toward providing ADA accessibility as financially feasible and will incorporate ADA compliance standards into future City rights of way projects. A systematic approach to providing accessibility will be taken in order to absorb the cost into the City of Saint Anthony Village budget for improvements to the public rights of way. Additional City contributions may be required as part of county roadway improvements based on cost participation policies as facilities are upgraded consistent with their respective ADA Transition Plan goals and objectives. The City CIP, which includes a detailed schedule and budget for specific improvements, is available on the City’s website at https://www.savmn.com/. Subtotal Total Sidewalk 61,888 SF 5.00$ /SF 309,438.70$ Curb Ramps 145 Each 4,000.00$ /Each 580,000.00$ $889,438.70 Replace Unit Cost 173 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix F APPENDIX F – AGENCY ADA DESIGN STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES 1. DESIGN PROCEDURES Intersection Corners Curb ramps or blended transitions will attempt to be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for an intersection corner to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and those intersection corners will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those intersection corners shall continue to be incorporated into future work. Regardless on if full compliance can be achieved or not, each intersection corner shall be made as compliant as possible in accordance with the judgment of City staff. Sidewalks / Trails Sidewalks and trails will attempt to be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for segments of sidewalks or trails to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and those segments will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those segments shall continue to be incorporated into future work. Regardless on if full compliance can be achieved or not, every sidewalk or trail shall be made as compliant as possible in accordance with the judgment of City staff. Traffic Control Signals Traffic control signals will attempt to be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for individual traffic control signal locations to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and those locations will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those locations shall continue to be incorporated into future work. Regardless on if full compliance can be achieved or not, each traffic signal control location shall be made as compliant as possible in accordance with the judgment of City staff. Other Transit Facilities Additional transit facilities are present within the limits of the City of Saint Anthony Village. Those facilities fall under the jurisdiction of Metro Transit. The City of Saint Anthony Village will support Metro Transit’s efforts to ensure that those facilities meet all appropriate accessibility standards. Other policies, practices and programs Policies, practices and programs not identified in this document will follow the applicable ADA standards. 2. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Saint Anthony Village has PROWAG, as adopted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), as its design standard. Refer to MnDOT Accessibility Design Guidance for current standards on the MnDOT website at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/design.html. 174 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix G APPENDIX G – GLOSSARY OF TERMS ABA: See Architectural Barriers Act. ADA: See Americans with Disabilities Act. ADA Transition Plan: Mn/DOT’s transportation system plan that identifies accessibility needs, the process to fully integrate accessibility improvements into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and ensures all transportation facilities, services, programs, and activities are accessible to all individuals. ADAAG: See Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. Accessible: A facility that provides access to people with disabilities using the design requirements of the ADA. Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS): A device that communicates information about the WALK phase in audible and vibrotactile formats. Alteration: A change to a facility in the public right-of-way that affects or could affect access, circulation, or use. An alteration must not decrease or have the effect of decreasing the accessibility of a facility or an accessible connection to an adjacent building or site. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The Americans with Disabilities Act; Civil rights legislation passed in 1990 and effective July 1992. The ADA sets design guidelines for accessibility to public facilities, including sidewalks and trails, by individuals with disabilities. Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG ): contains scoping and technical requirements for accessibility to buildings and public facilities by individuals with disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. APS: See Accessible Pedestrian Signal. Architectural Barriers Act (ABA): Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment. Capital Improvement Program (CIP): The CIP for the Transportation Department includes an annual capital budget and a five-year plan for funding the new construction and reconstruction projects on the city’s transportation system. Detectable Warning: A surface feature of truncated domes, built in or applied to the walking surface to indicate an upcoming change from pedestrian to vehicular way. DOJ: See United States Department of Justice. 175 Saint Anthony Village ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Appendix G Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): A branch of the US Department of Transportation that administers the federal-aid Highway Program, providing financial assistance to states to construct and improve highways, urban and rural roads, and bridges. FHWA: See Federal Highway Administration. Pedestrian Access Route (PAR): A continuous and unobstructed walkway within a pedestrian circulation path that provides accessibility. Pedestrian Circulation Route (PCR): A prepared exterior or interior way of passage provided for pedestrian travel. PROWAG : An acronym for the Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way issued in 2005 by the U. S. Access Board. This guidance addresses roadway design practices, slope, and terrain related to pedestrian access to walkways and streets, including crosswalks, curb ramps, street furnishings, pedestrian signals, parking, and other components of public rights-of-way. Rights of Way: A general term denoting land, property, or interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for the network of streets, sidewalks, and trails creating public pedestrian access within a public entity’s jurisdictional limits. Section 504: The section of the Rehabilitation Act that prohibits discrimination by any program or activity conducted by the federal government. Uniform Accessibility Standards (UFAS): Accessibility standards that all federal agencies are required to meet; includes scoping and technical specifications. United States Access Board: An independent federal agency that develops and maintains design criteria for buildings and other improvements, transit vehicles, telecommunications equipment, and electronic and information technology. It also enforces accessibility standards that cover federally funded facilities. United States Department of Justice (DOJ): The United States Department of Justice (often referred to as the Justice Department or DOJ), is the United States federal executive department responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice. 176 ADA Transition Plan For Pedestrian Facilities In the Public Right-of-Way CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 9, 2019 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits the discrimination of individuals on the basis of disability. Local agencies are required to evaluate its facilities that do not meet the requirements set forth in the ADA, and develop a transition plan for structural changes to facilities that are needed to achieve program accessibility. MnDOT and FHWA have made recent efforts to ensure local agencies have ADA Transition Plans. Background/Need 177 Develop policies and practices for public to provide input on ADA concerns. Develop a plan and schedule for achieving compliance in accordance with the ADA. Prepare self-evaluation of existing sidewalk and trail facilities including pedestrian access ramps. Establish ADA design standards for new facilities. Purpose of ADA Transition Plan Step 1: Designate an ADA Coordinator Step 2: Provide public notice about ADA requirements Step 3: Establish a grievance procedure Step 4: Develop design standards, specifications, and details Step 5: Assign personnel for the development and completion of a Transition Plan Step 6: Identify a schedule and budget to implement the Transition Plan Step 7: Monitor progress on the implementation of the Transition Plan Steps to Compliance 178 City required to publish its responsibilities regarding ADA If users of the facilities believe the City is not providing reasonable accommodation, they have the right to file a grievance Grievance procedures and form are outlined in Appendix D ADA Coordinator: Mark Casey Implementation Coordinator: Jay Hartman Public Notice, Grievance Procedure & ADA Coordinator Inventory: •7.5 miles of sidewalk •172 curb ramps •1 traffic control signal (city owned) Self-Evaluation of City-Owned Pedestrian Facilities Results: •73% of sidewalks meet accessibility criteria •16% of curb ramps meet accessibility criteria •100% of traffic signals compliant w/ Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) audible features •Estimated cost to achieve compliance: $890,000 179 Inventory Existing Facilities Results 73% of sidewalks meet accessibility criteria Sidewalks •> 60” wide •< 5% running slope •< 2% cross slope •Landing areas •< ¼” rise 180 Results 16% of curb ramps meet accessibility criteria Curb Ramps •Curb cut present •> 36” wide •< 8.33% running slope •< 2% cross slope •Landing area •Truncated domes Results 100% of traffic signals compliant w/APS audible features Traffic Signals •Push buttons exist •Push button location •Audible indicators 181 Priority areas –Near public buildings/facilities and schools Policy Approaches: 1.Incorporate improvements into CIP projects (already do this) 2.Standalone projects as determined by Council (case -by-case basis) 3.Annual maintenance budget as appropriate (case-by-case basis) Goal: Continually evaluate and improve city facilities Follow ADA design standards best practices (MnDOT, PROWAG) Coordination with Hennepin County, Ramsey County & MnDOT as their facilities are improved Implementation Approach Draft ADA plan was posted on City Website on March 7, 2019 for the required 30-day review period -No comments received Following adoption, Final plan will be available on City Website and encourage input from the community in future quarterly newsletters Ongoing public input key as part of on-going plan implementation Public Outreach 182 Questions 183 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 184 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE RESOLUTION 19-033 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ST. ANTHONY ADA TRANSITION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WHEREAS, the Federal government enacted the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) to protects qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the basis of disability in services, programs, and activities provided by State and local government entities; and WHEREAS, Title II of the ADA requires that every public agency with more than 50 employees develop and adopt an ADA Transition Plan which documents physical barriers to accessibility, propose modifications to remove those barriers, and a schedule to complete the modifications; and WHEREAS, city staff has completed a self-evaluation of all existing accessibility barriers on pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, city staff has developed an ADA Transition Plan that outlines a phased approach for the removal of barriers on pedestrian facilities in the public rights-of-way that are owned or operated by the City of St. Anthony Village pursuant to the requirements of Title II of the ADA; and WHEREAS, the City has solicited public comments on the proposed ADA Transition Plan for consideration by the City Council for adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village hereby approves the ADA Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, a copy of which shall be filed with and maintained by the City Clerk. Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 185 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 186 St. Anthony Village 2018 Public Works Annual Report Public Works Mission Statement The Mission of the Public Works Department is to provide effective and efficient design, construction operation and maintenance of the City’s infrastructure. The Public Works Department is organized into 6 divisions. These divisions work together to coordinate services and to enhance the quality of life to our residents, businesses and visitors by providing safe, reliable and effective service consistent with the vision and goals of the community. 187 Public Works Department Public Works Director Street Division 6 Employees Parks Division 3 Employees Public Works Superintendent Water/Sewer Division 2 Employees City Building All Employees Vehicle Maintenance Division 1 Employee Crew Leader Streets Parks Utilities Engineering Division WSB & Staff Employees Street Maintenance Division Street Sweeping (14 total) Asphalt repairs total 64 tons Concrete repairs total 8 cubic yards Snow & Ice Control 2018/2019 (14 citywide plowing events) -Salt usage ~ 380 tons -Salt brine ~ 2115 gallons 188 250 100 200 275 350 200 250 400 380 3970 3245 3515 2425 800 1370 2170 3055 2115 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-2016 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 SALT & SALT/BRINE USAGE 2010-2019 TONS SALT GALLONS SALT BRINE Ice Control Equipment Updated onboard controls for applying road salt were installed in two of the city’s single axle plow trucks. The SSC6100 control system is the industry leading integrated joystick and spreader controller. Fully equipped with camera integration and a 10” color LCD display. Operator is updated in real time of the amount of salt being applied per lane mile as well as air and road temperatures and the application rate can be adjusted accordingly. GPS device that gathers critical data. Precise Mobile Resource Management software securely transmits and stores this information for download into a web based reporting and mapping program. 189 Parks Maintenance Division City Parks -Emerald Park -Central Park -Tower Park -Silver Point Park -Trillium Park Storm Water Retention Ponds Storm Water Ditch Lines and City owned properties. Arbor Day tree planting Tree City designation.48924514365726323714236823761709017001414103113491109839432249614571032836131759397165923961357121176510486665666180 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 PARK USAGE BY ICE SKATERS EMERALD PARK, CENTRAL PARK & SILVER POINT PARK 2010-2019 Total Skaters Emerald Park Central Park Silver Point Park 190 Parks Commission 2018 Parks Commission Members: Scott Bentz Erin Jordahl-Redlin Therese Bellinger Sarah Ksiazek Marnie Overman Water/Sewer Division Annual Hydrant Flushing Annual inspection and maintenance of Water Distribution System and Well Pumps Rehab. Maintenance of Lift Station Facilities and sanitary sewer system. Upgrades to well motors and controls. Wilshire Park student water treatment plant tours. Watermain repairs ~ 3 service leaks ~ 8 water main breaks Annual CCR Report 191 17 10 11 10 10 7 8 4 2 7 8 3 0 4 2 4 1 4 8 1 7 3 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 WATERMAIN BREAKS & SERVICE LEAKS 2008-2018 WATERMAIN BREAKS SERVICE LEAKS Vehicle Maintenance Division DOT certified all Vehicles. RTA Fleet Management system. Equipment purchases: 2018 Streets Maintenance Division: Single Axle Plow Truck 2018 Parks Maintenance Division: Leaf and Debris Loader 2018 Parks Maintenance Division: Trac Vac Leaf Vacuum Bobcat Skidsteer Replacement Program. 192 City Buildings Division 2018 LED Lighting Retrofit Projects: Silver Lake Village Liquor Store Silver Lake Road street lights Water Treatment Plant Wells 3, 4, and 5 2018 Buildings Projects: New roof on Central Park Pavilion New carpeting in Central Park Pavilion Engineering Division 2018 Mirror Lake Stormwater Retention Basin 2018 Street Reconstruction Project Silver Lake Road LED street lighting project 193 Street & Utility Improvement Projects Schedule 2018-2027 2018 Street & Utility Improvement Project Macalaster Drive, Foss Road, Highcrest Road Splash deck water force main and lift station for Central Park irrigation. 194 Proposed 2019 Improvement Projects Silver Lake Road LED Street Lighting Project County Road C Project Silver Lake Road Flood Mitigation Project 33rd Ave and Silver Lake Road signal light upgrades City of St. Anthony A Village Within a City Mission : To be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe. 195 MN GreenCorps Member 2018-2019 Minette Saulog, Spring 2018 graduate of University of MN Educational background: Sustainability, Business Management, and Environmental Science Started in October and working on gaining experience with energy conservation projects Will be at St. Anthony through August MN GreenCorps –AmeriCorps program coordinated by MPCA 2018 Sustainability Initiatives Maintain MPCA Green Step 5 designation, received in 2017 Rain Barrel Workshop. April 19th 2018 Annual Spring Clean Up Day. May 5th 2018. Combined Fix It Clinic & Tech Dump Event. Oct 27th 2018 Sustainability in the Comprehensive Plan Pollinator Pathway Project Ramsey County Organics Recycling 196 2019 and Beyond Apply for Green Corp member 2019-2020 Continue with Public Building Energy Improvements and Sustainability Initiatives Monitoring Silver Lake TMDL Continue with City Fiber to park buildings. Complete splash deck water reuse lift station to supply irrigation water to all of Central Park. (Including school property) 2019 Upcoming Events Rain Barrel Seminar April 25th 5:45 pm Annual Citywide Clean-up day May 4th 9am to Noon at PW Facility Curbside Branch Chipping May 13th thru 24th Citywide Hydrant Flushing May 20th thru 24th 2019 VillageFest at Central Park August 2nd, 3rd, and 4th 197 PUBLIC WORKS “People Serving People” Entire report available on the website at www.savmn.com 198 199 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 200 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION  Meeting Date: April 9, 2019 Proposed Changes to Parks Commission Purpose, Membership, Powers and Duties OVERVIEW: In front of you this evening is a second of three readings to the proposed changes to sections 32.20, 32.21 & 32.25 of the Parks Commission ordinance. At the December 3, 2018 Parks Commission meeting, the Parks Commission unanimously recommended changes.to the Parks Commission Purpose, Membership, Powers and Duties. At the January 22, 2019 City Council meeting, the Parks Commission chair presented these changes. At the March 4, 2019 City Council Work Session, staff presented a recommended revisions and by consensus of the City Council, staff was directed to bring the attached for City Council approval. Highlights on the proposed changes include: Changing the name from Parks Commission to Parks and Environmental Commission Reducing the School District’s membership from two representatives to one Updating the Ordinance to take in account the School District #282 Student Liaison replacing the Sports Boosters representative Including “Environmental” under the Powers and Duties section where appropriate. The ordinance will take effect upon publication in the official City newspaper, St. Anthony Bulletin. 201 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 202 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-02 SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 32.20, 32.21, and 32.25 PARKS COMMISSION The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows: Section One. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code to Amend Sections §32.20, §32.21, and §32.25 Parks Commission in City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby amended as follows. The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The additional language is represented by single underlined text. § 32.20 PARKS AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION § 32.20 PURPOSE. The City of St. Anthony does now operate and maintain public parks for the benefit and pleasure of its residents. A City Parks and Environmental Commission is hereby established to advise the City Council regarding the promotion of the systematic, comprehensive, and effective development of park facilities necessary for the overall health, ability, and well-being of city residents of all ages. The Parks and Environmental Commission advises the City Council regarding policies, practices, and proposals that relate to the sustainable use and management of environmental resources, including air, water, energy, land, ecological resources, and waste. § 32.21 MEMBERSHIP. The Parks and Environmental Commission will consist of 8 7 members, 5 voting and 3 2 nonvoting, all of whom will be residents of the City of St. Anthony. Five of the 8 7 will be appointed by affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the St. Anthony City Council. There will be 3 2 nonvoting liaison members., The School Board of District #282 will appoint a member and City Council will appoint a School District #282 student liaison.each appointed by their respective organizations. The 3 liaisons will be appointed by the School Board of District #282; St. Anthony Community Services; and, the Sports Boosters of St. Anthony Village. St. Anthony-New Brighton School District Student Liaison, § 32.25 POWERS AND DUTIES. The powers and duties of the Parks and Environmental Commission shall be as follows: (A) To prepare, revise, and maintain a comprehensive, long-term plan for the redevelopment of parks within the city. This plan shall be viewed as a working document that serves as a framework and reference to future redevelopment; (B) To make recommendations to and advise the City Council and staff regarding park and environmental issues and ideas; (C) To establish priorities and recommend a phasing plan and schedule for implementing innovative park and environmental initiatives improvements, renovations, and plans; 203 (D) To work with other communities to explore cooperative arrangements to develop connecting routes in the form of bikeways, walking paths, and corridors of green space wherever possible; (E) To investigate funding sources, including requests for increases in the city budget, designated for parks, and green spaces and environmental initiatives; (F) To seek new areas for additional parks, natural areas, walking paths, bikeways, and green space corridors; (G) To generate community involvement in the development of parks, environmental initiatives and their elements; (H) To review and recommend revisions to the operation and maintenance of city parks and environmental initiatives; and (I) To periodically review, re-evaluate, and update the comprehensive park and environmental initiatives plan to reflect current and future park needs of the city. Section Two. Effective Date. This Ordinance amendment shall be in full force and effect upon its publication as provided by law. Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective as of its publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Adopted: CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE By:_________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: By:_________________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin Publication Date: 204 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION  Meeting Date: April 9, 2019 Proposed Small Wireless Facility Ordinance OVERVIEW: In front of you this evening is the proposed creation of Chapter 98 Small Wireless Facilities. In addition proposed changes to Chapter 96 Right of Way Management and Chapter 33 License and Permit Fees to ensure all chapters coincide. The first reading was conducted at the March 26, 2019 City Council meeting. The next generation of wireless services (called 5G) will require wireless providers to install a large amount of lower hanging antennas that are connected to fiber optic cable allowing wireless providers to provide significantly higher internet speeds. The facilities needed to provide 5G service are called small wireless facilities. The use of the word small is used to describe the area covered by each antenna, not the size of the facilities. Small wireless facilities include antennae, equipment cabinets, vertical conduit, power supplies, etc. Typically, small wireless facilities are attached to utilities poles, such as a light pole in the public right-of-way. Over the past 2 years, the Minnesota legislature enacted a new small wireless facility law and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released a small wireless facility order. These actions have placed new restrictions on how cities may handle applications to install small cell facilities. These restrictions include review and approval deadlines and limitations on fees. The following is a high level summary of the small wireless facility ordinance: • Requires all wireless providers to obtain a small wireless facility permit from Public Works prior to installing any small wireless facilities in the City. • Directs the Director of Public Works to develop a permit application form, and additional design standards, construction standards, aesthetic standards (attached Resolution) and other permit requirements. • Sets initial general standards for small wireless facilities. • Sets forth the application process from start to finish. • Mandatory conditions for all permits. • The term of all small wireless facility permits. • The process to deny or revoke a small wireless facility permit, including an appeal to the City 205 Council or the Council’s designee. • City inspection of permitted small wireless facilities. • Allowing the removal of abandoned or unauthorized small wireless facilities • Mandatory insurance provisions. • Indemnification and defense of the City requirements. • Application fees as set forth in the FCC’s small facility wireless order. • Annual small wireless facility permit fees for small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way as restricted by state law to the recovery of the City’s right-of-way management costs (to be included in Chapter 33 License and Permit Fees). • City-owned wireless support structure fees as limited by state law. This is for small wireless facilities collocated on city-owned wireless support structures in the public right-of-way (to be included in Chapter 33 License and Permit Fees). • Annual fees for use of city-owned property outside of the public right-of-way (to be included in Chapter 33 License and Permit Fees). • Construction of fiber optic cable and other activity in the public right-of-way remain subject to the City’s existing code and permitting requirements. • Macro-Cell towers remain subject to the City’s existing zoning code. Staff recommends waiving the second reading and move to final reading/adoption. 206 1 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2019-03 AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT A NEW CHAPTER 98 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING GENERAL STANDARDS, A PERMITTING PROCESS, GENERAL PERMITTING CONDITIONS, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, it is anticipated that wireless providers will increasingly rely on accessing the public right-of-way of the City of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota (the “city”) to collocate small wireless facilities in order to provide improved service to their subscribers; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that wireless providers will more heavily depend on obtaining use of public infrastructure in the public right-of-way, such as utility poles and other wireless support structures, due to a much greater number of antennas being required to provide next generation wireless services; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the increased number of antennas will result in economic benefits to the city and its residents; and WHEREAS, the city desires through the passage of this ordinance to develop a process that will allow wireless providers to rapidly deploy small wireless facilities while maintaining reasonable standards for the public right-of-way within the city; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and beneficial for the health, safety and welfare of the community to update the city’s zoning regulations for the collocation of small wireless facilities and installation or replacement of new wireless support structures to accommodate small wireless facilities; and WHEREAS, it is important to accommodate the growing need and demand for telecommunications services while protecting the character of the city and its neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish standards for location, aesthetics, and compatibility for small wireless facilities, wireless support structures, and their uses; and WHEREAS, there is a need to encourage the availability of affordable, high-speed internet and cellular telephone access for businesses and residents, acknowledging that a growing number of businesses are conducted from remote or off-site locations, that educational institutions increasingly incorporate online and distance learning methodologies, and that government participation and emergency service to the general public are enhanced by fast and reliable cellular and home internet connectivity; and WHEREAS, there have been recent changes to the mandates of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, and other applicable 207 2 federal and state laws, including, but not limited to, Minnesota Statutes Sections 237.162 and 237.163, that require the city to update its wireless regulations; and WHEREAS, a mechanism for the permitting of small wireless facilities, micro wireless facilities, and distributed antenna systems telecommunication uses is in the best interest of the citizens of the city; The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows: Section One. The City of Saint Anthony Village City Code Title IX is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 98 as follows. Chapter 98: Small Wireless Facilities 98.010 Purpose. A) General Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish specific requirements for obtaining a small wireless facility permit for the installation, mounting, modification, operation, and replacement of small wireless facilities and installation or replacement of wireless support structures by commercial wireless providers on public and private property, including in the public right-of-way. A small wireless facility permit issued under this Chapter does not abrogate any other requirements imposed under another Title of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village. B) This Chapter does not apply to any wireline facilities, including wireline backhaul facilities. A wireless provider must obtain an excavation permit or an obstruction permit, as needed, pursuant to Section 96.11 of the City Code of the city of Saint Anthony Village or other applicable authorization for use of the public right-of-way to construct, install, replace, or modify any wireline backhaul facility, such as fiber optic cable. The granting of a small wireless facility permit pursuant to this Chapter is not a grant of such authorization. 98.020 Definitions In this Chapter, the following terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them below: A) APPLICABLE LAW. All applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, rules, regulations, orders, and ordinances, as the same be amended or adopted from time to time. B) APPLICANT. Any person submitting a small wireless facility permit Application under this Chapter. C) CITY. The city of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota. D) COLLOCATE OR COLLOCATION. To install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure that is owned privately or by the city. 208 3 E) DAYS. Shall be counted in calendar days unless otherwise specified. When the day, or the last day, for taking any action or paying any fee falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday, the action may be taken, or the fee paid, on the next succeeding secular or business day. F) DECORATIVE POLE. A utility pole owned, managed, or operated by or on behalf of the city or any other governmental entity that: (a) is specifically designed and placed for an aesthetic purpose; and (b)(i) on which a nondiscriminatory rule or code prohibits an appurtenance or attachment, other than: (A) a small wireless facility, (B) a specialty designed informational or directional sign; or (C) a temporary holiday or special event attachment; or (ii) on which no appurtenance or attachment has been placed, other than: (A) a small wireless facility, (B) a specialty designed informational or directional sign; or (C) a temporary holiday or special event attachment. G) DEPARTMENT. The department of Public Works of the city. H) DESIGN DISTRICT. Any district within the city within which architectural design elements are required. I) DIRECTOR. The director of the department. J) EXCAVATE. To dig into or in any way remove, physically disturb, or penetrate a part of a public right-of-way. K) FCC OR COMMISSION. The Federal Communications commission. L) HISTORIC DISTRICT. A geographically definable area, urban or rural, that possesses a significant concentration, linkage or continuity of sites, buildings, structures or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development. A district may also comprise individual elements separated geographically during the period of significance but linked by association or function. M) MICRO WIRELESS FACILITY. A small wireless facility that is no larger than twenty- four (24) inches long, fifteen (15) inches wide, and twelve (12) inches high, and whose exterior antenna, if any, is no longer than eleven (11) inches. N) OBSTRUCT. To place a tangible object in a public right-of-way so as to hinder free and open passage over that or any part of the public right-of-way. O) PERMITTEE. A person that has been granted a small wireless facility permit by the department. P) PERSON. Any individual, group, company, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust, corporation, society, syndicate, club, business, or governmental entity. “person” shall not include the city. 209 4 Q) PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. The area on, below, or above a public roadway, highway, street, cartway, bicycle lane, and public sidewalk in which the city has an interest, including other dedicated rights-of-way for travel purposes and utility easement of the city. R) SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY. (a) a wireless facility that meets both of the following qualifications: (i) each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six (6) cubic feet in volume or, in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all its exposed elements could fit within an enclosure of no more than six (6) cubic feet; and (ii) all other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility, excluding electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment, is in aggregate no more than twenty-eight (28) cubic feet in volume; or(b) a micro wireless facility. S) SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY PERMIT. A permit issued by the department authorizing the installation, mounting, maintenance, modification, operation, or replacement of a small wireless facility or installation or replacement of a wireless support structure in addition to collocation of a small wireless facility on the wireless support structure. T) UTILITY POLE. A pole that is used in whole or in part to facilitate telecommunications or electric service. It does not include a traffic signal pole. U) WIRELINE BACKHAUL FACILITY. A facility used to transport communications data by wire from wireless facility to a communications network. V) WIRELESS FACILITY. Equipment at a fixed location that enables the provision of wireless service between user equipment and a wireless service network, including: (a) equipment associated with wireless service; (b) a radio transceiver, antenna, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration; and (c) a small wireless facility. “wireless facility” does not include: (a) wireless support structures; (b) wireline backhaul facilities; or (c) Coaxial or fiber-optic cables (i) between utility poles or wireless support structures, or (ii) that are not otherwise immediately adjacent to or directly associated with a specific antenna. W) WIRELESS PROVIDER. A provider of wireless service, including, but not limited to, radio communication service carried on between mobile stations or receivers and land stations, and by mobile stations communicating among themselves and which permits a user generally to receive a call that originates and/or terminates on the public switched network or its functional equivalent, regardless of the radio frequencies used. X) WIRELESS SERVICE. Any service using licensed or unlicensed wireless spectrum, including the use of Wi-Fi, whether at a fixed location or by means of a mobile device, that is provided using wireless facilities. wireless service does not include services regulated 210 5 under Title VI of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, including a cable service under United States Code, title 47, section 522, clause (6). Y) WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE. A new or existing structure in a public right-of- way designed to support or capable of supporting small wireless facilities, including, but not limited to, a utility pole or a building, as reasonably determined by the department. 98.030 small wireless facility permit Applications. A) Application Form. The director shall develop and make publicly available a form application. To the extent possible, the director shall allow for applications to be consolidated pursuant to this Section. A complete application must be submitted for each small wireless facility permit desired. B) Consolidated Applications. A wireless provider may apply for up to 15 small wireless facility permits in a consolidated application, provided all small wireless facilities in the consolidated application are located within a two-mile radius, consist of substantially similar equipment, and are to be collocated on similar types of wireless support structures. The department shall review a consolidated application as allowed by this Chapter. If necessary, the applied for small wireless facility permits in a consolidated application may be approved or denied individually, but the department may not use the denial of one or more permits as a basis to deny all small wireless facility permits in a consolidated application. Any small wireless facility permits denied in a consolidated application shall be subject to a single appeal. C) Information Not Required. The department shall not require an applicant to provide any information that: 1. Has previously been provided to the department by the applicant in a small wireless facility permit application, if the applicant provides specific reference to the previous application containing the information sought by the department and the previous information remains unchanged; and 2. Is not reasonably necessary to review a small wireless facility permit application for compliance with generally applicable and reasonable health, safety, and welfare regulations, and to demonstrate compliance with applicable Federal Communications commission regulations governing audio frequency exposure, or other information required by this Chapter. 98.040 Establishment of General Standards. A) General Standards. The director shall establish and maintain a set of standards for the installation, mounting, maintenance, modification, operation, or replacement of small wireless facilities and placing new or replacement wireless support structures in the public right-of-way applicable to all permittees under this Chapter (the “general standards”). The general standards shall include, but not be limited to, information to be required in a small wireless facility permit application, design standards, construction standards, aesthetic 211 6 standards, a form application, permitting conditions, insurance and security requirements, and rates and fees. B) Design Standards. Any design standards established by the director shall be: (a) reasonable and nondiscriminatory, and (b) include additional installation and construction details that do not conflict with this Chapter, including, but not limited to, a requirement that: (i) an industry standard pole load analysis be completed and submitted an the city, indicating that the wireless support structure to which the small wireless facility is to be attached will safely support the load, and (ii) small wireless facility equipment on new and existing wireless support structures be placed higher than fifteen (15) feet above ground level. The director shall additionally include the following in any design standards established under this Chapter: 1. Any wireless support structure installed in the public right-of-way after May 31, 2017 may not exceed fifty (50) feet above ground level, unless the city agrees to a greater height, subject to local zoning regulations, and may be subject to separation requirements in relation to other wireless support structures. 2. Any wireless support structure replacing an existing wireless support structure that is more than fifty (50) feet above ground level may be placed at the height of the existing wireless support structure, unless the city agrees to a greater height, subject to zoning regulations. 3. wireless facilities constructed in the public right-of-way after May 31, 2017 may not extend more than ten (10) feet above an existing wireless support structure in place as of May 31, 2017. 4. If necessary to collocate a small wireless facility, a wireless provider may replace a decorative pole, if the replacement pole reasonably conforms to the design and aesthetic qualities of the displaced decorative pole. 5. A wireless provider shall comply with the city’s requirements to install facilities underground, including, without limitation, compliance with Section 96.27 of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village. 6. All small wireless facilities collocated or wireless support structures installed in a design district or historic district shall comply with any design or concealment or other measures required by the city. C) Construction Standards. Any construction standards established by the director shall include at least the following terms and conditions: 1. Compliance with applicable law. To the extent this requirement is not preempted or otherwise legally unenforceable, a permittee shall comply with all applicable law and applicable industry standards. 2. Prevent Interference. A permittee shall collocate, install, and continuously operate any authorized small wireless facilities and wireless support structures in a manner 212 7 that prevents interference with other wireless facilities and other facilities in the Right-of-Way and the operation thereof. With appropriate permissions from the department, a permittee shall, as is necessary for the safe and reliable operation, use, and maintenance of an authorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure, maintain trees as prescribed by standards promulgated by the department. 3. Other Rights Not Affected. A permittee shall not construe a contract, permit, correspondence, or other communication from the city as affecting a right, privilege, or duty previously conferred or imposed by the department to or on another person. 4. Restoration. A permittee, after any excavation of a public right-of-way, shall provide for restoration of the affected public right-of-way and surrounding areas, including the pavement and its foundation, to the same condition that existed before the excavation. If a permittee fails to adequately restore the public right-of-way within a specified date, the department may: a) itself restore the public right-of-way and recover from the permittee the reasonable costs of the surface restoration; or b) recover from the permittee a reasonable degradation fee associated with a decrease in the useful life of the public right-of-way caused by the excavation. A permittee that disturbs uncultivated sod in the excavation or obstruction of the public right-of-way shall plant grasses that are native to Minnesota and, wherever practicable, that are of the local eco-type, as part of the restoration required under this Section, unless the owner of the real property over which the public right-of- way traverses objects. In restoring the public right-of-way, the permittee shall consult with the department of Wildlife Conservation regarding the species of native grasses that conform to the requirements of this paragraph. 5. permittee’s Liability. A permittee is solely responsible for the risk and expense of the collocation of the permittee’s small wireless facility and installing or replacing the permittee’s wireless support structure. The city neither warrants nor represents that any area within the public right-of-way is suitable for such collocation or installation or replacement. A permittee shall accept the public right-of-way “as is” and “where is” and assumes all risks related to any use. The city is not liable for damage to small wireless facilities due to an event of damage to a wireless support structure in the public right-of-way. 98.050 small wireless facility Application Review Process. A) Eligibility for Review. An application shall be eligible for review if the application conforms to the general standards adopted by the director. B) Authorization. A small wireless facility permit issued pursuant to any application processed hereunder shall authorize: (1) the installation, mounting, modification, 213 8 operation, and replacement of a small wireless facility in the public right-of-way or city- owned property; or (2) construction of a new, or replacement of an existing, wireless support structure, and collocation of a small wireless facility on the wireless support structure. C) Review Process. An application submitted pursuant to this Section shall be reviewed as follows: 1. Submission of Application. An applicant shall submit a complete application accompanied by the appropriate application fee as set forth in Section 98.150 (Fees and Costs) to the department. Prior to submitting a small wireless facility permit Application, an applicant shall inspect any wireless support structure on which it proposes to collocate a small wireless facility and determine, based on a structural engineering analysis by a Minnesota registered professional engineer, the suitability of the wireless support structure for the proposed collocation. The structural engineering analysis shall be submitted to the department with the application, and shall certify that the wireless Support structure is capable of safely supporting the proposed small wireless facility considering conditions at the proposed location, including the condition of the public right-of-way, hazards from traffic, exposure to wind, snow and/or ice, and other conditions affecting the proposed small wireless facility that may be reasonably anticipated. 2. Application Review Period. The department shall, within sixty (60) days after the date a complete application for the collocation is submitted to the department, issue or deny a small wireless facility permit pursuant to the application. The department shall, within ninety (90) days after the date a complete application for a new or replacement wireless support structure in addition to the collocation of a small wireless facility is submitted to the department, issue or deny a small wireless facility permit pursuant to the application. If the department receives applications within a single seven-day period from one or more applicants seeking approval of small wireless facility permits for more than thirty (30) small wireless facilities or ten (10) wireless support structures, the department may extend the 90-day review period of this Chapter by an additional 30 days. If the department elects to invoke this extension, it must inform in writing any applicant to whom the extension will be applied. 3. Completeness Determination. The department shall review a small wireless facility permit Application for completeness following submittal. The department shall provide a written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within ten (10) days of receipt of the application, clearly and specifically delineating all missing documents or information. Information delineated in the notice is limited to documents or information publicly required as of the date of application and reasonably related to the department’s determination of whether the proposed equipment falls within the definition of a small wireless facility and whether the proposed deployment satisfies all health, safety, and welfare regulations applicable to the small wireless facility permit request complies with this Chapter and applicable Standards promulgated by the department. If an applicant fails to 214 9 respond to the department’s notice of incompleteness within ninety (90) days, the Application shall be deemed expired and no small wireless facility permit shall be issued. Upon an applicant’s submittal of additional documents or information in response to a notice of incompleteness, the department shall within ten (10) days of submission notify the applicant in writing of any information requested in the initial notice of incompleteness that is still missing. Second or subsequent notices of incompleteness may not specify documents or information that were not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness. 4. Reset and Tolling of Review Period. In the event that a small wireless facility permit Application is incomplete, and the department has provided a timely and complete written notice of incompleteness, then the applicable review period shall be reset, pending the time between when a notice is mailed and the submittal of information in compliance with the notice. Subsequent notices shall toll the applicable review period. An applicant and the department can mutually agree in writing to toll the applicable review period at any time. 5. Moratorium Prohibited. Notwithstanding any applicable law to the contrary, including, but not limited to, Minnesota Statutes Sections 394.34 and 462.355, the department shall not establish any moratorium with respect to the filing, receiving, or processing of applications for small wireless facility permits, or issuing or approving small wireless facility permits. 6. Nondiscriminatory Processing of Applications. The department shall ensure that any application processed under this Chapter is performed on a nondiscriminatory basis. 7. Permit Not Required. A permittee shall provide 30 days advance written notice to the department, but shall not be required to obtain a small wireless facility permit, or pay an additional small wireless facility permit fee for: a) routine maintenance; b) the replacement of a small wireless facility with a small wireless facility that is substantially similar to or smaller in size; or c) the installation, placement, maintenance, operation, or replacement of a micro wireless facility that is strung on a cable between existing utility poles, in compliance with the National Electrical Safety Code. 98.060 Small Wireless Facility Permit Conditions. A) General Conditions of Approval. In processing and approving a small wireless facility permit, the department shall condition its approval on compliance with: 1. Generally applicable and reasonable health, safety, and welfare regulations consistent with the city’s public right-of-way management; 215 10 2. Reasonable accommodations for a decorative pole; 3. Any reasonable restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements when a new wireless support structure is placed in the public right-of-way; 4. Construction of the proposed small wireless facility within six (6) months from the date the small wireless facility permit is issued; 5. Obtaining additional authorization for use of the public right-of-way for the construction of wireline backhaul facilities or any other wired facilities; 6. Compliance with the city’s general standards; and 7. Compliance with all applicable law. B) Generally Applicable and Reasonable Health, Safety, and Welfare Regulations. Generally applicable and reasonable health, safety, and welfare regulations for purposes of this Section include, without limitation, the following: 1. A structural engineering analysis by a Minnesota registered professional engineer certifying that a wireless support structure can reasonably support a proposed small wireless facility considering the conditions of the street, the anticipated hazards from traffic to be encountered at the proposed location, and any wind, snow, ice, or other conditions that may be reasonably anticipated at the proposed location; 2. A determination by the department that, based upon reasonable engineering judgment, a proposed small wireless facility is of excessive size or weight or would otherwise subject a wireless support structure to an unacceptable level of stress; 3. A determination by the department that, based upon reasonable engineering judgment, a proposed small wireless facility would cause undue harm to the reliability or integrity of the city’s electrical infrastructure or would likely violate generally applicable electrical or engineering principles; 4. A determination by the department that a proposed small wireless facility presents an unreasonable safety hazard as specifically and reasonably identified by the department; 5. A determination by the department that a proposed small wireless facility impairs the city’s ability to operate or maintain the public right-of-way; or 6. A determination by the department that a proposed small wireless facility cannot be placed due to insufficient capacity and the infrastructure cannot be modified or enlarged consistent with the requirements of this Chapter and the department’s General Standards; 7. A determination by the department that a proposed small wireless facility is in violation of the National Electric Safety Code or applicable law. 216 11 C) Authorized Use. An approval of a small wireless facility permit under this Section authorizes the collocation of a small wireless facility on an existing wireless support structure to provide wireless services, or the installation or replacement of a wireless support structure and collocation of a small wireless facility, and shall not be construed to confer authorization to: 1. provide any service other than wireless service; 2. construct, install, maintain, or operate any small wireless facility or wireless support structure in a Right-of-Way other than the approved small wireless facility or wireless support structure; or 3. install, place, maintain, or operate a wireline backhaul facility in the public right- of-way. D) Other permits Required. Any person desiring to obstruct or perform excavation in a public right-of-way within the city for purposes of collocating a small wireless facility or installing or replacing a wireless support structure shall, consistent with Section 96.11 of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village, obtain the necessary permit from the city prior to conducting any such activities. E) Exclusive Arrangements Prohibited. The city shall not enter into an exclusive arrangement with any person for use of a public right-of-way for the collocation of a small wireless facility or for the installation or operation of a wireless support structure. F) Unauthorized Small Wireless Facility. No person shall install, mount, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility in the public right-of-way or on city-owned property, or install or replace a wireless support structure without first obtaining a small wireless facility permit from the city. 1. If an unauthorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure is discovered, the department shall provide written notice to the owner of the unauthorized small wireless facility within five (5) days of discovery of the unauthorized small wireless facility. If an owner of an unauthorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure cannot be reasonably identified, the department need not provide any written notice. 2. If the owner of an unauthorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure can be reasonably identified, the department may remove the unauthorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure without incurring liability to the owner of the small wireless facility or wireless support structure and at the owner’s sole expense no sooner than five (5) days after providing notice of the department’s discovery of the unauthorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure to the owner. 3. If the owner of an unauthorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure cannot be reasonably identified, the department may remove the unauthorized small wireless facility or wireless support structure without incurring liability to the 217 12 owner of the small wireless facility or wireless support structure and at the owner’s sole expense. G) Relocation. The department may require a permittee to relocate or modify a small wireless facility or wireless support structure in a public right-of-way or on city-owned property in a timely manner and at the permittee’s cost if the department determines that such relocation or modification is required to protect public health, safety and welfare, or to prevent interference with other facilities authorized pursuant to this chapter, or to prevent interference with public works projects of the department. H) Security Required. Each permittee shall submit and maintain with the department a bond, cash deposit, or other security acceptable to the department, in a form and amount determined by the department in accordance with the general standards, securing the faithful performance of the obligations of the permittee and its agents under any and all small wireless facility permits issued to the permittee under this Chapter. If, in accordance with this Chapter, the department deducts any amounts from such security, the permittee must restore the full amount of the security prior to the department’s issuance of any subsequent small wireless facility permit. The department shall return or cancel the security should the permittee cease to operate any small wireless facilities in the public right-of- way. I) Payment of Fees Required. A small wireless facility permit shall not be issued prior to the complete payment of all applicable Fees. J) Notice of Assignment Required. A permittee upon or within ten (10) calendar days after transfer, assignment, conveyance, or sublet of an attachment that changes the permit and/or billing entity or ownership responsibilities shall provide written notification to the department. 98.070 Small Wireless Facility Permit Term. A) Term. A small wireless facility permit for a small wireless facility in the public right-of- way shall have a term equal to the length of time that the small wireless facility is in use, unless the small wireless facility permit is revoked under this Chapter or is otherwise allowed to be limited by applicable law. The term for all other small wireless facility permits shall be for a period of up to ten (10) years. 98.080 Denial or Revocation of a Small Wireless Facility Permit. A) Permit Denial. The department may deny any small wireless facility permit if the applicant does not comply with all provisions of this Chapter, or if the department determines that the denial is necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare, or when necessary to protect the public right-of-way and its current use. B) Permit Revocation. The department may revoke a small wireless facility permit, with or without refund, in the event of a substantial breach of the terms and conditions of any statute, ordinance, rule, or regulation, or any material condition of the small wireless facility permit. A substantial breach includes, but is not limited to, the following: 218 13 1. a material violation by act or omission of a provision of a small wireless facility permit; 2. an evasion or attempt to evade any material provision of a small wireless facility permit, or the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any fraud or deceit upon the city or its citizens; 3. a material misrepresentation of fact in a small wireless facility permit application; 4. a failure to correct, in a timely manner, collocation of a small wireless facility or installation or replacement of a wireless support structure that does not conform to applicable standards, conditions, or codes, upon inspection and notification by the department of the faulty condition; 5. a permittee fails to make timely payments of any fees due, and does not correct such failure within twenty (20) days after receipt of written notice by the city of such failure; 6. a permittee becomes insolvent, unable or unwilling to pay its debts, is adjudged bankrupt, or all or part of its small wireless facilities or wireless support structures are sold under an instrument to secure a debt and is not redeemed by the permittee within sixty (60) days; or 7. a failure to complete collocation of a small wireless facility or installation, modification, or replacement of a wireless support structure within two-hundred seventy (270) days of the date a small wireless facility permit authorizing such activity is granted, unless the department and the permittee agree to extent the two- hundred seventy day period or there is a lack of commercial power or communications transport infrastructure to the installation site. C) Written Notice Required. Any denial or revocation of a small wireless facility permit shall be made in writing and shall document the basis for the denial or revocation. The department shall notify the applicant or permittee in writing within three (3) days of a decision to deny or revoke a small wireless facility permit. If a small wireless facility permit application is denied, the applicant may cure the deficiencies identified by the department and submit its Application. If the applicant resubmits the application within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice of the denial, it may not be charged an additional filing or processing fee. The department must approve or deny the revised application within thirty (30) days after the revised application is submitted. If small wireless facility permit is revoked, the small wireless facility or wireless support structure shall be subject to removal in accordance with Section 98.110 (Removal of a small wireless facility or wireless support structure). 98.090 City Inspection of a Small Wireless Facility or Wireless Support Structure. A) Inspection permitted. The department may inspect, at any time, a permittee’s collocation of a small wireless facility or installation or replacement of a wireless support structure. The department shall determine during an inspection whether the permittee’s small 219 14 wireless facility or wireless support structure is in accordance with the requirements of the permittee’s applicable small wireless facility permit and other applicable law. B) Suspension of Activities. During an inspection, if the department determines that a permittee has violated any material term of the permittee’s small wireless facility permit or this Chapter, the department may suspend the permittee’s small wireless facility permit. The department shall provide prompt written notice of any suspension to a permittee, including the violations giving rise to the suspension. A suspension under this Paragraph is effective until a permittee corrects the alleged violation(s), at the permittee’s sole expense. If the violation(s) are not corrected within thirty (30) days after the date of such notice, the small wireless facility or wireless support structure shall be subject to removal in accordance with Section 98.110 (Removal of a small wireless facility or wireless support structure). A permittee may appeal any suspension issued under this paragraph to the department as provided in Section 98.120 (Appeals). 98.100 Abandonment. A) Abandoned Small Wireless Facilities and Wireless Support Structures. Where a small wireless facility or wireless support structure is not properly maintained or has not been used for the primary purpose of providing wireless services for twelve (12) consecutive months, the department may designate the small wireless facility or wireless support structure as abandoned. The department shall provide written notice to a permittee within ten (10) days of the permittee’s small wireless facility or wireless support structure being designated as abandoned. 98.110 Removal of a Small Wireless Facility or Wireless Support Structure. A) Removal permitted. The department may remove, at permittee’s expense, or require a permittee to remove, any small wireless facility or wireless support structure if: 1. The small wireless facility permit or wireless support structure permit is revoked under this Chapter or expires without renewal; or 2. The small wireless facility or wireless support structure is designated by the department as abandoned under Section 98.100 (Abandonment). B) Notice to permittee; Time to Remove. The department shall provide written notice to the permittee that it must remove a small wireless facility or wireless support structure under this section, including the reasons therefor. If the permittee does not remove the small wireless facility or wireless support structure within thirty (30) days after the date of such notice, the department may remove it at the permittee’s expense without further notice to the permittee. 98.120 Appeals. A) Appeal. An applicant or permittee may have the denial or revocation of a small wireless facility permit, or fees and costs required by this Chapter reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council or its designee. The City Council or its designee shall act on a timely 220 15 written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting. A decision by the City Council or its designee affirming a denial, revocation, or fee shall be in writing and supported by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision. 98.130 Insurance. A) Minimum Coverage. The department shall require that each permittee maintain in full force and effect, throughout the term of a small wireless facility permit, an insurance policy or policies issued by an insurance company or companies satisfactory to the city's risk manager. Such policy or policies shall, at a minimum, afford insurance covering all of the permittee’s operations, vehicles, employees, agents, subcontractors, successors, and assigns as follows: 1. Workers' compensation, in statutory amounts, with employers' liability limits not less than $500,000 each accident, injury, or illness; 2. Commercial general liability insurance with limits not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, including contractual liability, personal injury, products and completed operations; 3. Commercial automobile liability insurance with limits not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, including owned, non-owned and hired auto coverage, as applicable; and 4. Contractors' pollution liability insurance, on an occurrence form, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage and any deductible not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) each occurrence. B) Insurance Requirements. Each permittee’s insurance policy or policies are subject to the following: 1. Said policy or policies shall include the city and its officers and employees jointly and severally as additional insureds, shall apply as primary in surance, shall stipulate that no other insurance effected by the city will be called on to contribute to a loss covered thereunder, and shall provide for severability of interests. 2. Said policy or policies shall provide that an act or omission of one insured, which would void or otherwise reduce coverage, shall not reduce or void the coverage as to any other insured. Said policy or policies shall afford full coverage for any claims based on acts, omissions, injury, or damage which occurred or arose, or the onset of which occurred or arose, in whole or in part, during the policy period. 3. Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to provide thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice of cancellation or any material change to the department. 4. Should any of the required insurance be provided under a claims-made form, a permittee shall maintain such coverage continuously throughout the term of a small 221 16 wireless facility permit, and, without lapse, for a period of three (3) years beyond the expiration or termination of the small wireless facility permit, to the effect that, should occurrences during the term of the small wireless facility permit give rise to claims made after expiration or termination of the small wireless facility permit, such claims shall be covered by such claims-made policies. 5. Should any of the required insurance be provided under a form of coverage that includes a general annual aggregate limit or provides that claims investigation or legal defense costs be included in such general annual aggregate limit, such general aggregate limit shall be double the occurrence or claims limits specified herein. C) Indemnity Obligation. Such insurance shall in no way relieve or decrease a permittee’s or its agent’s obligation to indemnify the city pursuant to this Chapter. D) Proof of Insurance. Before the department will issue a small wireless facility permit, an applicant shall furnish to the department certificates of insurance and additional insured policy endorsements with insurers that are authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota and that are satisfactory to the department evidencing all coverages set forth herein. 98.140 Indemnification and Defense of city. A) Indemnification of city. As a condition of issuance of a small wireless facility permit, each permittee agrees on its behalf and on behalf of its agents, successors, or assigns, to indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the city from and against any and all claims of any kind arising against the city as a result of the issuance of the small wireless facility permit including, but not limited to, a claim allegedly arising directly or indirectly from the following: 1. Any act, omission, or negligence of a permittee or its any agents, successors, or assigns while engaged in the permitting or collocation of any small wireless facility or installation or replacement of any wireless support structure, or while in or about the public right-of-way that are subject to the small wireless facility permit for any reason connected in any way whatsoever with the performance of the work authorized by the small wireless facility permit, or allegedly resulting directly or indirectly from the permitting or collocation of any small wireless facility or installation or replacement of any wireless support structure authorized under the small wireless facility permit; 2. Any accident, damage, death, or injury to any of a permittee's contractors or subcontractors, or any officers, agents, or employees of either of them, while engaged in the performance of collocation of any small wireless facility or installation or replacement of any wireless support structure authorized by a small wireless facility permit, or while in or about the public right-of-way that are subject to the small wireless facility permit, for any reason connected with the performance of the work authorized by the small wireless facility permit, including from exposure to radio frequency emissions; 222 17 3. Any accident, damage, death, or injury to any person or accident, damage, or injury to any real or personal property in, upon, or in any way allegedly connected with the collocation of any small wireless facility or installation or replacement of any wireless support structure authorized by a small wireless facility permit, or while in or about the public right-of-way that are subject to the small wireless facility permit, from any causes or claims arising at any time, including any causes or claims arising from exposure to radio frequency emissions; and 4. Any release or discharge, or threatened release or discharge, of any hazardous material caused or allowed by a permittee or its agents about, in, on, or under the public right-of-way. B) Defense of City. Each permittee agrees that, upon the request of the department, the permittee, at no cost or expense to the city, shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the city against any claims as set forth in this Section, regardless of the alleged negligence of the city or any other party, except only for claims resulting directly from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the city. Each permittee acknowledges and agrees that it has an immediate and independent obligation to defend the city from any claims that actually or potentially fall within the indemnity provision, even if the allegations are or may be groundless, false, or fraudulent, which obligation arises at the time such claim is tendered to the permittee or its agent by the city and continues at all times thereafter. Each permittee further agrees that the city shall have a cause of action for indemnity against the permittee for any costs the city may be required to pay as a result of defending or satisfying any claims that arise from or in connection with a small wireless facility permit, except only for claims resulting directly from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the city. Each permittee further agrees that the indemnification obligations assumed under a small wireless facility permit shall survive its expiration or completion of collocation of any small wireless facility authorized by the small wireless facility permit. C) Additional Requirements. The department may specify in a small wireless facility permit such additional indemnification requirements as are necessary to protect the city from risks of liability associated with the permittee's collocation of any small wireless facility or installation or replacement of any wireless support structure. 98.150 Fees and Costs. A) Application Fees. The department shall charge a fee for reviewing and processing a small wireless facility permit application. These fees shall be identified in Chapter 33 of the St. Anthony Village City Code. The purpose of this fee is to enable the department to recover its costs directly associated with reviewing a small wireless facility permit Application. Commencing January 1, 2020, the department shall adjust the Application Fees annually by the consumer price index for the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. B) Annual Small Wireless Facility Permit Fee. The department shall charge an annual small wireless permit fee for each small wireless facility permit issued to a permittee. The Annual small wireless permit fee shall be determined by the director and listed in the city’s fee 223 18 schedule. The annual small wireless permit fee shall be based upon the recovery of the city’s rights-of-way management costs. C) City-Owned Wireless Support Structure Fees. The department shall charge a fee or fees to the owner of any small wireless facility collocated on a wireless support structure owned by the city or its assigned located on the public rights-of-way. These fees shall be identified in Chapter 33 of the St. Anthony Village City Code. D) City-Owned Property Fees. The department shall charge an annual fee for collocating small wireless facilities on city-owned property not located in the public right-of-way. The department shall determine a reasonable and nondiscriminatory annual fee on a per location and per request basis. E) Discretion to Require Additional Fees. In instances where the review of a small wireless facility permit Application is or will be unusually costly to the department, the director, in his or her discretion, may, after consulting with other applicable city departments, agencies, boards, or commissions, require an applicant to pay a sum in excess of the other fee amounts charged pursuant to this Section. This additional sum shall be sufficient to recover the actual, reasonable costs incurred by the department and/or other city departments, agencies, boards, or commissions, in connection with a small wireless facility permit Application and shall be charged on a time and materials basis. Whenever additional fees are charged, the director, upon request, shall provide in writing the basis for the additional fees and an estimate of the additional fees. The department may not require a fee imposed under this Chapter through the provision of in-kind services by an applicant as a condition of consent to use to city’s public right-of-way or to obtain a small wireless facility permit. F) Reimbursement of City Costs. The department may determine that it requires the services of an expert in order to evaluate a small wireless facility permit Application. In such cases, the department shall not issue a small wireless facility permit pursuant to the Application unless the applicant agrees to reimburse the department for the actual, reasonable costs incurred for the services of a technical expert. 98.160 Severability. A) Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Chapter or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Chapter or any part thereof. Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective as of its publication. First Reading: March 26, 2019 Second Reading: Waived Adopted: April 9, 2019 224 19 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE By: ____________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST By: ____________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Publish: Saint Anthony Bulletin Publication Date: April 17, 2019 225 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 226 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-034 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION FOR ORDINANCE 2019-03 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony has adopted the above referenced ordinance adding a new chapter 98 Relating to Small Wireless Facilities, Establishing General Standards, Permitting Process, General Permitting Conditions, and Other Requirements; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing maps or charts; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent of Ordinance 2019-03. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: the following summary of Ordinance 2019-03 shall be published in the official paper in lieu of the entire ordinance. SUMMARY PUBLICATION Ordinance 2019-03 An Ordinance Adding Chapter 98 Relating to Small Wireless Facilities, Establishing General Standards, Permitting Process, General Permitting Conditions, and Other Requirements; The City Council of the City of St. Anthony adopted Ordinance 2019-03 on April 9, 2019, this ordinance outlines the city of St. Anthony’s standards for Small Wireless Facilities and permitting process. The full Ordinance is available for review at City Hall, St. Anthony City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418. Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 227 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 228 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION  Meeting Date: April 9, 2019 Resolution – Small Cell Wireless Facilities Aesthetic Standards OVERVIEW: In front of you this evening is a Resolution to approve Small Cell Wireless Facilities Aesthetic Standards. Per Ordinance 96 Small Wireless Facilities, the Director of Public Works shall establish and maintain a set of aesthetic standards for the installation, mounting, maintenance, modification, operation, or replacement of small wireless facilities and placing new or replacement wireless support structures in the public right-of-way. 229 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 230 Small Wireless Aesthetic Standards Findings The City desires the most advanced and highest quality wireless services available. The City also wishes to minimize the negative impacts associated with wireless facility deployments including small wireless facilities. Such negative impacts may include interference with right-of-way sight lines, aesthetic impacts that are inconsistent with the surrounding area, fall zone and clear zone risks, navigation obstacles, interference with future right-of-way improvement or transportation improvement plans, interference with the installation or maintenance of other utilities, and increased visual or noise pollution. To address such impacts, any person desiring to collocate small wireless facilities or place new wireless support structures in the right-of-way must first obtain a small wireless facility permit pursuant to the City’s right-of-way ordinance, Code Section. Moreover, any person seeking to collocate small wireless facilities on an existing wireless support structure owned or controlled by the City must first enter a standard collocation agreement. The following aesthetic standards and requirements are intended to maintain the City’s aesthetic environment while also allowing for the availability wireless services, including broadband and “5G” services, using small wireless facilities. These standards are intended to establish clear and consistent aesthetic standards for small wireless facility placements in the City and establish a streamlined review and approval process. The City will make these standards publicly available. These standards apply to all small wireless facility permit applications for placement of small wireless facilities on City-owned and non-City-owned support structures (poles), and the placement or replacement of small wireless support structures in the public right-of-way. Compliance with these standards is a requirement for, and condition of, issuance of a small wireless facility permit. Any installation that does not conform to these standards will be in violation of the associated permit and the City’s right-of-way ordinance. In addition to the following standards, the placement of new support structures for small wireless facilities shall be subject to any conditions specified in the small wireless facility permit. Applications to install small wireless facilities or place new support structures in districts zoned for residential uses or within a historic district established by federal or state law or city ordinance, shall further be subject to any conditions contained in the required conditional use permit authorizing such installation. With respect to City-owned support structures, these standards additionally seek to: 1. establish a menu of design options for providers to select from when applying for new small wireless facility permits associated with City support structures. 2. minimize unnecessary placement of new poles by encouraging co-location of small wireless facilities. 231 2   3. in situations where City support structures will be replaced, require that the structures be of a stealth design such that the maximum amount of facilities, including any wiring, are concealed inside the structure. 4. in situations where attachments will be made to existing poles, require that facilities, equipment, cabling, and conduit be concealed through the use of approved shrouding or camouflaging. Section 1. Site Plans Applicants must submit site plans, elevation drawings and structural calculations prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota as detailed below. Site plans must depict any adjoining or nearby existing wireless facilities, with all existing transmission equipment identified; neighboring public improvements; the proposed small wireless facility, with all proposed transmission equipment and other improvements, and; the boundaries of the area surrounding the proposed facility and any associated access or utility easements and setbacks. Site plans must further include: 1. Photo Simulations: For all applications, photo simulations must be included. Such photo simulations must be from at least three line-of-site locations near the proposed project site depicting the viewpoints of the greatest pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 2. Equipment Specifications: For all equipment depicted on the plans, the applicant must include: a. the manufacturer’s name and model number; b. physical dimensions including, without limitation, height, width, depth, volume and weight with mounts and other necessary hardware; c. technical rendering of all external components, including enclosures and all attachment hardware; and d. a selection from the City’s approved aesthetic standards. Section 2. Design Standards The City desires to promote aesthetically acceptable and area conforming wireless facilities using the smallest and least intrusive means available to provide small wireless services to the community. All facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with all applicable provisions in this section. Antennas: Antennas must be top-mounted and concealed within a radome (a structural, weatherproof enclosure that protects an antenna and is constructed of material that minimally 232 3   attenuates the signal transmitted/received by such antenna) or otherwise concealed to the extent feasible. Cable connections, antenna mounts and other hardware must also be concealed. The radome or other concealment must be non-reflective and painted or otherwise colored to match the existing support structure. Collocation: Collocations between wireless service providers on the same support structure is required wherever feasible. If an applicant chooses to not collocate in areas where options are or appear to be available, the applicant must document that collocation is infeasible. Concealment: Concealment elements must be incorporated into the proposed design of the small wireless facility installation, and must include approved camouflaging or shrouding techniques. Pole-Mounted Equipment Cages/Shrouds: When facilities are permitted to be pole- mounted, facilities other than the antenna(s), electric meter and disconnect switch must be concealed within an equipment shroud. The facilities must be installed at a height that presents the least aesthetic impact, but in no event lower than fifteen (15’) feet above ground level. The equipment shroud must be non-reflective and painted, wrapped or otherwise colored to match the support structure. Shrouds must be mounted flush to the support where feasible. Standoff mounts must provide the minimum separation distance from the support structure necessary for feasibility. New Poles: New support structures must be the same color as neighboring, similar support structures and of the same design characteristics. Ground-Mounted Equipment: Ground-mounted equipment must be installed below grade or, if technically necessary, concealed in a ground-mounted cabinet. In addition to any applicable requirements in the City’s right-of-way ordinance, Code Section, ground mounted cabinets must: 1. be installed flush to the ground; 2. be the same color as neighboring, similar support cabinets or other ground-mounted structures; 3. on or adjoining sidewalks, trails, or other similar passageways, not interfere in any way with the flow of pedestrian, bicycle or vehicular traffic; 4. conform to the American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) including with respect to appropriate sidewalk spacing; and 5. not create a safety hazard; Lights: Unless otherwise required for compliance with FAA or FCC regulations, small wireless facilities shall not include any lights or lighting. This subsection does not prohibit installations on streetlights or the installation of luminaires or additional street lighting on new support structures if and where required by the City. 233 4   Section 3. Location Criteria Obstructions: Any new support structure or other facilities associated with a new or existing support structure must not obstruct access to: 1. any existing above-ground or underground right-of-way user facilities, or public facilities; 2. any public infrastructure for traffic control, streetlight or public transportation purposes, including without limitation any curb control sign, parking meter, vehicular traffic sign or signal, pedestrian traffic sign or signal, barricade reflectors; 3. any public transportation vehicles, shelters, street furniture or other improvements at any public transportation stop (including, without limitation, bus stops, streetcar stops, and bike share stations); 4. fire hydrants; 5. any doors, gates, sidewalk doors, passage doors, stoops or other ingress and egress points to any building appurtenant to the right-of-way; and/or 6. any fire escapes. Section 4. New and Replacement Support Structures New Support Structures: Any new support structures shall be placed: 1. a minimum of feet from any existing support structure or pole, and 2. at a distance which is the same as the prevailing separation distance among existing structures and poles in the surrounding vicinity as agreed upon by the applicant and City, or determined by the City where agreement cannot be reached. 3. as functional streetlights as the City may require, in its reasonable discretion. 4. in alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetlights. 5. an equal distance between trees when possible, with a minimum of 15 feet separation such that no proposed disturbance shall occur within the critical root zone of any tree. 6. with appropriate clearance from existing utilities. 7. outside of a 20-foot equipment clear zone (for base cabinets less than 18-inches in diameter) or 30-foot clear sight triangle (for base cabinets equal to or greater than 18-inches in diameter) at intersection corners. 234 5 8.so as not to be located along the frontage of a Historic building, deemed historic on a federal, state, or local level. 9. so as not to significantly create a new obstruction to property sight lines. 10.at shared property lines if feasible. 11.not within feet of the apron of a fire station or other emergency service responder facility. Replacement of City-Owned Support Structures: Any replaced support structures shall remain in their existing location unless otherwise permitted by the City. Replacement pole height shall not exceed 50 feet, or the height of the existing pole, whichever is greater. New and Replacement Structures. All support structures must: be constructed of aluminum or steel. where constructed as a light pole, luminaire(s) and luminaire arm(s) must match adjacent city lighting standard and must contain an LED fixture in accordance with City specifications. Section 5. Menu of Options The Director has pictures and profile drawings representing appropriate installation designs for small wireless facilities installations on new and existing support structures in the right of way. 235 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 236 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-035 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SMALL WIRELESS AESTHETIC STANDARDS WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has adopted Chapter 98, an ordinance relating to small wireless facilities, establishing general standards, a permitting process, general permitting conditions, and other requirements; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony desires to have the highest quality of wireless services available while minimizing the negative aesthetic impacts of the small wireless facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony has developed aesthetic standards related to small wireless facilities to guide design and placement of facilities; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village approves the small wireless aesthetic standards. Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 237 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 238 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-04 SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 33.061 ESTABLISHMENT OF FEE AMOUNTS The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows: Section One. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code to Amend Section §33.061 Establishment of Fee Amounts of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby amended as follows. The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The additional language is represented by single underlined text. § 33.061 ESTABLISHMENT OF FEE AMOUNTS Application Fees Small Wireless Facility permit application seeking to collocate up to five (5) Small Wireless Facilities. This fee shall increase by $100 for each additional Small Wireless Facility that an applicant seeks to collocate. $500 Small Wireless Facility permit application seeking to install or replace a Wireless Support Structure in addition to collocating of a Small Wireless Facility on the Wireless Support Structure. $1000 Annual Small Wireless Facility Permit Fee $150 per year for each small wireless facility City Owned Wireless Support Structure Fees $150 per year for rent to occupy space on Wireless Support Structure $25 per year for maintenance associated with the space occupied on the Wireless Support Structure; and Monthly fee for electricity used to operate the Small Cell Wireless Facility, if not purchased directly from a utility, at the rate of: a)$73 per radio node less than or equal to 100 max watts, b)$182 per radio node over 100 max watts; or c)the actual costs of electricity, if the actual costs exceed the above Annual City Owned Property Fees $150 per year for each collocating Small Wireless Facilities on City owned property not located in the public right of way. Section Two. Effective Date. This Ordinance amendment shall be in full force and effect upon its publication as provided by law. 239 Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective as of its publication. First Reading: March 26, 2019 Second Reading: Waived Adopted: April 9, 2019 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE By:_________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: By:_________________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin Publication Date: April 17, 2019 240 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-036 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION FOR ORDINANCE 2019-04 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony has adopted the above referenced ordinance concerning establishment of fees; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing maps or charts; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent of Ordinance 2019-04. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: the following summary of Ordinance 2019-04 shall be published in the official paper in lieu of the entire ordinance. SUMMARY PUBLICATION Ordinance 2019-04 An Ordinance Amending Section 33.061 in Chapter 33 Establishment of Fees; The City Council of the City of St. Anthony adopted Ordinance 2019-04 on April 9, 2019, this ordinance establishes fees for Small Wireless Facilities, including: application fees, annual small wireless facility permit fees, city owned wireless support structure fees, and annual city owned property fees. The full Ordinance is available for review at City Hall, St. Anthony City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418. Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 241 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 242 Right-of-Way Management 1 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2019-05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MULTIPLE SECTIONS IN CHAPTER 96 RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows: Section One. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code Chapter 96 Right of Way Management of the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby amended as follows. The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The additional language is represented by underlined text. § 96.01 FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. To provide for the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, and to ensure the integrity of its streets and the appropriate use of the rights-of-way, the city strives to keep its rights-of-way in a state of good repair and free from unnecessary encumbrances. Accordingly, the city hereby enacts this new chapter of this code relating to right-of-way permits and administration. This chapter imposes reasonable regulation on the placement and maintenance of facilities and equipment currently within its rights-of-way or to be placed therein at some future time. It is intended to complement the regulatory roles of state and federal agencies. Under this chapter, persons excavating and obstructing the rights-of-way will bear financial responsibility for their work. Finally, this chapter provides for recovery of out-of-pocket and projected costs from persons using the public rights-of- way. This chapter shall be interpreted consistently with 1997 Session Laws, Chapter 123, substantially codified in Minnesota Statutes Sections 237.16, 237.162, 237.163, 237.79, 237.81, and 238.086 (the "Act") and 2017 Session Laws, Chapter 94 amending the Act and the other laws governing applicable rights of the city and users of the right-of-way. This chapter shall also be interpreted consistent with Minnesota Rules 7819.0050 —7819.9950 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560 where possible. To the extent any provision of this chapter cannot be interpreted consistently with the Minnesota Rules, that interpretation most consistent with the Act and other applicable statutory and case law is intended. This chapter shall not be interpreted to limit the regulatory and police powers of the city to adopt and enforce general ordinances necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public. § 96.02 ELECTION TO MANAGE THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY Pursuant to the authority granted to the city under state and federal statutory, administrative and common law, the city hereby elects, pursuant Minn. Stat. 237.163 subd. 2(b), to manage rights-of- way within its jurisdiction. § 96.03 DEFINITIONS. The following definitions apply in this chapter of this code. References hereafter to "sections" are, unless otherwise specified, references to sections in this chapter. Defined terms remain defined 243   terms, whether or not capitalized. ABANDONED FACILITY. A facility no longer in service or physically disconnected from a portion of the operating facility, or from any other facility, that is in use or still carries service. A facility is not abandoned unless declared so by the right-of-way user. APPLICANT. Any person requesting permission to excavate or obstruct a right-of-way. BUSINESS DISTRICT. Those portions of the city known as St. Anthony Shopping Center in the south end of the city and Silver Lake Village in the north end of the city. CITY. The City of St. Anthony, Minnesota, its elected officials’ officers, employees, agents, or any other commission, committee, or subdivision of the city acting pursuant to lawfully delegated authority. Note: See, Minn. Stat. § 237.162, Subd. 10. CITY COST. The actual costs incurred by the city for managing rights-of-way, including, but not limited to, costs associated with registering of applicants; issuing, processing, and verifying right-of-way permit applications; revoking right-of-way permits; inspecting job sites; creating and updating mapping systems; determining the adequacy of right-of-way restoration; restoring work inadequately performed; maintaining, supporting, protecting, or moving user equipment during right-of-way work; budget analysis; record keeping; legal assistance; systems analysis; and performing all of the other tasks required by this chapter, including other costs the city may incur in managing the provisions of this character except as expressly prohibited by law. CITY INSPECTOR. Any person authorized by the city to carry out inspections related to the provisions of this chapter. COLLOCATE OR COLLOCATION. To install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure or utility pole that is owned privately, or by the city or other governmental unit. COMMISSION. The State Public Utilities Commission. CONGESTED RIGHT-OF-WAY. A crowded condition in the subsurface of the public right-of- way that occurs when the maximum lateral spacing between existing underground facilities does not allow for construction of new underground facilities without using hand digging to expose the existing lateral facilities in conformance with Minnesota Statutes, section 216D.04 subdivision 3, over a continuous length in excess of 500 feet. CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND. Any of the following forms of security provided at permittee's option:  Individual project bond;  Cash deposit;  Security of a form listed or approved under Minn. Stat. Sec. 15.73, subd. 3;  Letter of Credit, in a form acceptable to the city;  Self-insurance, in a form acceptable to the city;  A blanket bond for projects within the city, or other form of construction bond, for a time specified and in a form acceptable to the city. 244 Right-of-Way Management 3     DEGRADATION. A decrease in the useful life of the right-of-way caused by excavation in or disturbance of the right-of-way, resulting in the need to reconstruct such right-of-way earlier than would be required if the excavation or disturbance did not occur. DEGRADATION COST. Subject to Minnesota Rules 7819.1100 means the cost to achieve a level of restoration, as determined by the city at the time the permit is issued, not to exceed the maximum restoration shown in plates 1 to 13, set forth in Minnesota Rules parts 7819.9900 to 7819.9950. DEPARTMENT. The department of public works of the city. DIRECTOR. The director of the department of public works of the city, or her or his designee. DELAY PENALTY. The penalty imposed as a result of unreasonable delays in right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration as established by permit. EMERGENCY. A condition that: (1) Poses a clear and immediate danger to life or health or of significant loss of property; or (2) Requires immediate repair or replacement in order to restore service to a customer. EQUIPMENT. Any tangible asset used to install, repair, or maintain facilities in any right-of-way. EXCAVATE. To dig into or in any way remove or physically disturb or penetrate any part of right-of-way, except for horticultural practices of penetrating the boulevard area to a depth of less than 12 inches. EXCAVATION PERMIT. The permit which, pursuant to this chapter, must be obtained before a person may excavate in a right-of-way. An EXCAVATION PERMIT allows the holder to excavate that part of the right-of-way as described in the permit. EXCAVATION PERMIT FEE. Money paid to the city by an applicant to cover the costs as provided in § 96.12. FACILTY OR FACILITIES. Any tangible asset in the right-of-way required to provide Utility Service. but shall not include boulevard plantings or gardens planted or maintained in the right-of- way between a person’s property and the street curb. FIVE YEAR PROJECT PLAN. Shows projects adopted by the city for construction within the next five years. HIGH-DENSITY CORRIDOR. A designated portion of the public right-of-way within which telecommunications right-of-way users having multiple and competing facilities may be required to build and install facilities in a common conduit system or other common structure. HOLE. An excavation in the pavement, with the excavation having a length less than the width of the pavement. IN. When used in conjunction with right-of-way, means over, above, in, within, on, or under a right-of-way. 245   LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE. The person or persons, or designee of the person or persons, authorized by a registrant to accept service and to make decisions for that registrant regarding all maters within the scope of this chapter. MANAGEMENT COSTS. The actual costs the city incurs in managing its rights-of-way, including such costs, if incurred, as those associated with registering applicants; issuing, processing, and verifying right-of-way or small wireless facility permit applications; inspecting job sites and restoration projects; maintaining, supporting, protecting, or moving user facilities during right-of-way work; determining the adequacy of right-of-way restoration; restoring work inadequately performed after providing notice and the opportunity to correct the work; and revoking right-of-way or small wireless facility permits. Management costs do not include payment by a telecommunications right-of-way user for the use of the right-of-way, unreasonable fees of a third-party contractor used by the city including fees tied to or based on customer counts, access lines, or revenues generated by the right-of-way or for the city, the fees and cost of litigation relating to the interpretation of Minnesota Session Laws 1997, Chapter 123; Minnesota Statutes Sections 237.162 or 237.163; or any ordinance enacted under those sections, or the city fees and costs related to appeals taken pursuant to Section 1.30 of this chapter. MAPPING DATA. Information indicating the horizontal and vertical location of equipment and facilities, relative to the boundaries of the right-of-way. OBSTRUCT. To place any tangible object in the right-of-way so as to hinder free and open passage over that or any part of the right-of-way. OBSTRUCTION PERMIT. The permit which, pursuant to this chapter, must be obtained before a person may obstruct a right-of-way, allowing the holder to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of right-of-way by placing equipment described therein on the right-of-way for the duration specified therein. OBSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE. Money paid to the city by a registrant to cover the costs as provided in § 96.12. PATCH OR PATCHING. A method of pavement replacement that is temporary in nature. A patch consists of (1) the compaction of the subbase and aggregate base, and (2) the replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement for a minimum of two feet beyond the edges of the excavation in all directions. A patch is considered full restoration only when the pavement is included in the city's five-year project plan. PAVEMENT. Any type of improved surface that is within the public right-of-way and that is paved or otherwise constructed with bituminous, concrete, aggregate, or gravel. PERFORMANCE AND RESTORATION BOND. A performance bond or letter of credit posted to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to assure that all obligations pursuant to this chapter, including, but not limited to, right-of-way excavation and obstruction work, is timely and properly completed as defined by the approved excavation and/or obstruction permit. PERMIT. Has the meaning given "right-of-way permit" in Minnesota Statutes, section 237.162. PERMITTEE. Any person to whom a permit to excavate or obstruct a right-of-way has been granted by the city under this chapter. PERSON. Any natural or corporate person, business association, or other business entity, 246 Right-of-Way Management 5     including, but not limited to, partnership, sole proprietorship, a political subdivision, a public or private agency of any kind, utility, a successor or assign of any of the foregoing, or any other legal entity which has or seeks to have equipment located in any right-of-way. PROBATION. The status of any person that has not complied with the conditions of this chapter. PROBATION PERIOD. One year from the date that a person has been notified in writing that they have been put on probation. REGISTRANT. Any person who (1) has or seeks to have its equipment or facilities located in any right-of-way, or (2) in any way occupies or uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right-of-way or place its facilities or equipment in the right-of-way. RESTORE or RESTORATION. The process by which an excavated right-of-way and surrounding area, including pavement and foundation, is returned to the same condition and life expectancy that existed before excavation. RESTORATION COST. The amount of money paid to the city by a permittee to achieve the level of restoration according to plates 1 to 13 of Minnesota Public Utilities Commission rules. PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY. The area on, below, or above a public roadway, highway, street, cartway, bicycle lane or public sidewalk in which the city has an interest, including other dedicated rights-of-way for travel purposes and utility easements of the city. A right- of-way does not include the airwaves above a right-of-way with regard to cellular or other nonwire telecommunications or broadcast service.  RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT. Either the excavation permit or obstruction permit, or both, depending on the context, required by this chapter. RIGHT-OF-WAY USER. (1) A telecommunications right-of-way user as defined by Minnesota Statutes, section 237.162, subd. 4; or (2) a person owning or controlling a facility in the right-of-way that is used or intended to be used for providing utility service, and who has a right under law, franchise, or ordinance to use the public right-of-way. SERVICE or UTILITY SERVICE. Includes, but is not limited to: (1) those services provided by a public utility as defined in Minn. Stat. 216B.02, subds. 4 and 6; (2) services of a telecommunications right-of-way user, including transporting of voice or data information; (3) services of a cable communications systems as defined in Minn. Stat. Chapter. 238; (4) natural gas or electric energy or telecommunications services provided by the city; (5) services provided by a cooperative electric association organized under Minn. Stat., Chapter 308A; and (6) water, and sewer, including service laterals, steam, cooling or heating services. 247   SERVICE LATERAL. An underground facility that is used to transmit, distribute or furnish 'gas, electricity, communications, or water from a common source to an end-use customer. A service lateral is also an underground facility that is used in the removal of wastewater from a customer's premises. SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY. A wireless facility that meets both of the following qualifications: (i) each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or could fit within such an enclosure; and (ii) all other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility provided such equipment is, in aggregate, no more than 28 cubic feet in volume, not including electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment. Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.162, Subd. 11.   SUPPLEMENTARY APPLICATION. An application made to excavate or obstruct more of the right-of-way than allowed in, or extend, a permit that had already been issued. TEMPORARY SURFACE. The compaction of subbase and aggregate base and replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement only to the edges of the excavation. It is temporary in nature except when the replacement is of pavement included in the city's two-year plan, in which case it is considered full restoration. TRENCH. An excavation in the pavement, with the excavation having a length equal to or greater than the width of the pavement. TELECOMMUNICATIONS RIGHT-OF-WAY USER. A person owning or controlling a facility in the right-of-way, or seeking to own or control the same, that is used or intended to be used for a facility in the right-of-way that is used or is intended to be used for providing wireless service, or transporting telecommunication or other voice or data information. For purposes of this chapter, a cable communications system defined and regulated under M.S. Chapter 238, as it may be amended from time to time, and telecommunications activities related to providing natural gas or electric energy services, a public utility as defined in Minn. Stat. Sec. 216B.02, a municipality, a municipal gas or power agency organized under Minn. Stat. Chaps. 453 and 453A, or a cooperative electric association organized under Minn. Stat. Chap. 308A, are not telecommunications right-of-way users for purposes of this chapter except to the extent such entity is offering wireless service. UNUSABLE EQUIPMENT. Equipment located in the right-of-way which has remained unused for 1 year and for which the registrant is unable to provide proof that it has either a plan to begin using it within the next 12 months or a potential purchaser or user of the equipment. USER FEE. The sum of money, payable to the city, by a person using or occupying the right- of-way; provided, however, that the city may at its option provide, at any time by ordinance or by amendment thereto, for a greater or different fee applicable to all the persons in an amount and by a method of determination as may be further provided in the ordinance or amendment thereto. (1993 Code, § 1165.02)   UTILITY POLE. A pole that is used in whole or in part to facilitate telecommunications or electric service. 248 Right-of-Way Management 7     Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.162, Subd. 12. WIRELESS FACILITY. Equipment at a fixed location that enables the provision of wireless services between user equipment and a wireless service network, including equipment associated with wireless service, a radio transceiver, antenna, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and a small wireless facility, but not including wireless support structures, wireline backhaul facilities, or cables between utility poles or wireless support structures, or not otherwise immediately adjacent to and directly associated with a specific antenna. Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.162, Subd. 13. WIRELESS SERVICE. Any service using licensed or unlicensed wireless spectrum, including the use of Wi-Fi, whether at a fixed location or by means of a mobile device, that is provided using wireless facilities. Wireless service does not include services regulated under Title VI of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, including cable service. WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE. A new or existing structure in a right-of-way designed to support or capable of supporting small wireless facilities, as reasonably determined by the city. Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.162, Subd. 16. § 96.04 ADMINISTRATION. The city may designate a principal city official responsible for the administration of the rights- of-way, right-of-way permits, and the ordinances related thereto. The city may delegate any or all of the duties hereunder. (1993 Code, § 1165.03)   § 96.05 UTILITY COORDINATION COMMISSION The city may create an advisory utility coordination committee. Participation on the committee is voluntary. It will be composed of any registrants that wish to assist the city in obtaining information and, by making recommendations regarding use of the right-of-way, and to improve the process of performing construction work therein. The city may determine the size of such committee and shall appoint members from a list of registrants that have expressed a desire to assist the city. § 96.06 REGISTRATION, BONDING, AND RIGHT-OF-WAY OCCUPANCY. (A) Each person or service that occupies, uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right-of-way or any equipment located in the right-of-way, including by lease, sublease or assignment, or who has, or seeks to have, equipment located in any right-of-way, must register with the city. Registration will consist of providing application information and as required by the city, paying a registration fee, and posting a performance and restoration bond. The performance and restoration bond required in this section, and in §§ 96.12, 96.15, and 96.34, shall be in an amount determined at the city’s sole discretion, sufficient to serve as security for the full and complete performance of the obligations under this chapter, including any costs, expenses, damages, or loss the city pays or incurs because of any failure to comply with this chapter or any other applicable laws, regulations or standards. During periods of construction, repair, or restoration of rights-of-way or equipment in rights-of-way, the performance and restoration bond shall be in an amount sufficient to cover 100% of the estimated cost of the work, as documented by the person proposing to perform the work, or in the lesser amount as may be determined by the city, taking into account the amount of equipment, in the right-of-way, the location and method of 249   installation of the equipment, the conflict or interference of the equipment with the equipment of other persons, and the purposes and policies of this section. Sixty days after completion of the work, the performance and restoration bond may be reduced by the sole determination of the city. (B) No person may construct, install, repair, remove, relocate, or perform any other work, except as permitted in division (C) below, on or use any equipment or any part thereof located in any right-of-way without first being registered with the city. (C) Nothing herein shall be construed to repeal or amend the provisions of a city ordinance permitting persons to plant or maintain boulevard plantings or gardens or in the area of right-of-way between their property and the street curb. Persons planting or maintaining boulevard plantings or gardens shall not be deemed to use or occupy the right-of-way, and shall not be required to obtain any permits or satisfy any other requirements for planting or maintaining the boulevard plantings or gardens under this chapter. However, excavations deeper than 12 inches are subject to the permit requirements of § 96.11 and nothing herein relieves a person from complying with the provisions of the Minn. Stat. Chap. 216D, Gopher One Call Law. (1993 Code, § 1165.04) § 96.07 RIGHT TO OCCUPY RIGHTS-OF-WAY; PAYMENT OF FEES. (A) Any person required to register under § 96.08, which occupies, uses, or places its equipment in the right- of-way, is hereby granted a right to do so if and only so long as it timely pays all fees as provided herein and complies with all other requirements of law. A permit issued under this Chapter does not authorize the collocation of a small wireless facility or the installation or replacement of a wireless support structure. To collocate a small wireless facility or install or replace a wireless support structure in the public right-of-way, a person must obtain a small wireless facility permit pursuant to the city of Saint Anthony Village city Code Chapter 98. (B) The grant of right in division (A) above is expressly conditioned on, and is subject to, the police powers of the city, continuing compliance with all provisions of law now or hereafter enacted, including this chapter as it may be from time to time amended and, authorizations, whether from the city or other body or authority. (1993 Code, § 1165.05) § 96.08 FRANCHISE; FRANCHISE SUPREMACY. The city may, in addition to the requirements of this chapter, require any person which has or seeks to have equipment located in any right-of-way to obtain a franchise to the full extent permitted by law, now or hereafter enacted. The terms of any franchise which are in direct conflict with any provision of this chapter, whether granted prior or subsequent to enactment to this chapter, shall control and 250 Right-of-Way Management 9     supersede the conflicting terms of this chapter, provided, however, that requirements relating to insurance, bonds, penalties, security funds, letters of credit, indemnification, or any other security in favor of the city may be cumulative in grantee. All other terms of this chapter shall be fully applicable to all persons whether franchised or not. (1993 Code, § 1165.06) § 96.09 REGISTRATION INFORMATION. (A) Generally. The information provided to the city at the time of registration shall include, but not to be limited to: 1) Each registrant's name, Gopher One-Call registration certificate number, address and e-mail address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers. 2) The name, address and e-mail address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers of a local representative. The local representative or designee shall be available at all times. Current information regarding how to contact the local representative in an emergency shall be provided at the time of registration. 3) A certificate of insurance or self-insurance: a) Shall be on a form approved by the City b) Verifying that an insurance policy has been issued to the registrant by an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota, or a form of self-insurance acceptable to the city; c) Verifying that the registrant is insured against claims for personal injury, including death, as well as claims for property damage arising out of the (i) use and occupancy of the right- of-way by the registrant, its officers, agents, employees and permittees, and (ii) placement and use of facilities and equipment in the right-of-way by the registrant, its officers, agents, employees and permittees, including, but not limited to, protection against liability arising from completed operations, damage of underground facilities and collapse of property; d) Naming the city as an additional insured as to whom the coverages required herein are in force and applicable and for whom defense will be provided as to all such coverages; e) Requiring that the city be notified thirty (30) days in advance of cancellation of the policy or material modification of a coverage term; and f) Indicating comprehensive liability coverage, automobile liability coverage, workers compensation and umbrella coverage established by the city in amounts sufficient to protect the city and the public and to carry out the purposes and policies of this chapter. g) The city may require a copy of the actual insurance policies. h) If the person is a corporation, a copy of the certificate is required to be filed under Minn. Stat. Sec. 300.06 as recorded and certified to by the Secretary of State. i) A copy of the person's order granting a certificate of authority from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission or other authorization or approval from the applicable state or federal agency to lawfully operate, where the person is lawfully required to have such authorization or approval from said commission or other state or federal agency. (B) Notice of changes. The registrant shall keep all of the information listed above current at all times by providing to the city information of changes within 15 days following the date on which the registrant has knowledge of any change. 251   (C) Grant of right; payment of user fee. (1) Any person required to register under this section, which furnishes utility services or which occupies, uses, or places its equipment in the right-of-way, is hereby granted a right to do so if and only so long as it pays the user fees as provided herein in a timely manner and complies with all other requirements of law. This legal entitlement shall not include use of the right-of-way for purposes not in furtherance of furnishing utility services for which additional authorization is required by this chapter or other state or federal law, unless the person pays the user fee for the non-utility service use. (2) The fee shall be paid to the city in substantially equal quarterly installments, subject to adjustment and correction at the conclusion of the calendar year. This fee shall be paid for all and any part of a calendar year, prorated on a daily basis, during any time period in which the permit holder uses or occupies the right-of-way to furnish utility service, or places, maintains or uses its wires, mains, pipes, or any other facilities or equipment in the right-of-way. (3) The granting of the right is expressly conditioned on, and is subject to, continuing compliance with all provisions of law, including this section. (D) Franchise agreements; franchise payments. This section does not apply to a person or business which uses and occupies the right-of-way for operating its business when there is a preexisting franchise agreement between that person or business and the city and franchise payments are made as agreed. (1993 Code, § 1165.07) § 96.10 REPORTING OBLIGATIONS. (A) Operations. (1) Each registrant shall at the time of registration and by December 1 of each year, file a construction and major maintenance plan with the city. Registrants must use commercially reasonable efforts to anticipate and plan for all upcoming projects and include all the projects in a construction or major maintenance plan. The plan shall be submitted using a format designated by the city and shall contain the information determined by the city to be necessary to facilitate the coordination and reduction in the frequency of excavations and obstructions of rights-of-way. (2) The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: (a) The specific locations and the estimated beginning and ending dates of all projects to be commenced during the next calendar year (in this chapter, a “next-year project’); and (b) The tentative locations and beginning and ending dates for all projects contemplated for the 5 years following the next calendar year (in this chapter, a “5-year project”). (3) The term “project” in this section shall include both next-year projects and 5-year projects. (4) By January 1 of each year, the city will have available for inspection in its offices a composite list of all projects of which it has been informed in the annual plans. All registrants are responsible for keeping themselves apprised of the current status of this list. (5) Thereafter, by February 1, each registrant may change any project in its list of next-year 252 Right-of-Way Management 11     projects, and must notify the city and all other registrants of all the changes in the list. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a registrant may at any time join in a next-year project of another registrant that was listed by the other registrant. (B) Additional next-year projects. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city may, for good cause shown, allow a registrant to submit additional next-year projects. Good cause included, but is not limited to, the criteria set forth in § 96.19 concerning the discretionary issuance of permits. (1993 Code, § 1165.08) § 96.11 PERMIT REQUIREMENT. (A) Generally. Except as otherwise provided in this code, no person may obstruct or excavate any right-of-way, or facilities in the right-of-way, without first having obtained the appropriate right-of-way permit from the city to do so. (B) Excavation permit. An excavation permit is required to allow the holder to excavate that part of the right-of-way described in the permit and/or to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of the right-of-way by placing equipment described therein, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. (C) Obstruction permit. An obstruction permit is required to allow the holder to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of right-of-way by placing equipment, vehicles, or other obstructions described therein on the right-of-way for the duration specified therein. (D) Small Wireless Facility Permit. A small wireless facility permit is required by a registrant to erect or install a wireless support structure, to collocate a small wireless facility, or to otherwise install a small wireless facility in the specified portion of the right-of-way, to the extent specified therein, provided that such permit shall remain in effect for the length of time the facility is in use, unless lawfully revoked. Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.163, Subd. 13. (E)(D) Permit extensions. No person may excavate or obstruct the right-of-way beyond the date or dates specified in the permit unless the person makes a supplementary application for another right- of-way permit before the expiration of the initial permit, and a new permit extension is granted.   (F)(E) Delay Penalty. In accordance with Minnesota Rule 7819.1000 subp. 3 and notwithstanding subd. 2 of this Section, the city shall establish and impose a delay penalty for unreasonable delays in right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration. The delay penalty shall be established from time to time by city council resolution. (G)(F) Permit display. Permits issued under this chapter shall be conspicuously displayed at all times at the indicated work site and shall be available for inspection by the City Inspector and authorized city personnel. (1993 Code, § 1165.09) Penalty, see § 10.99 § 96.12 PERMIT APPLICATIONS. (A) Application for a permit is made to the city. 253   (B) Right-of-way permit applications shall contain, and will be considered complete only upon compliance with, the requirements of the following provisions: (1) Registration with the city pursuant to this chapter; (2) Submission of completed permit application form, including all required attachments, and scaled drawings showing the location and area of the proposed project and the location of all existing and proposed equipment; and (3) Payment of all money due to the city for: (a) Permit fees, estimated restoration costs, and other management costs ; (b) Prior obstructions or excavations; (c) Any loss, damage, or expense suffered by the city as a result of applicant’s prior excavations or obstructions of the rights-of-way or any emergency action taken by the city; and (d) Franchise fees or other charges, if applicable.   (e) Payment of disputed amounts due the city by posting or depositing in an escrow account an amount equal to at least 110% of the amount owing (C) When an excavation permit is requested for purposes of installing additional equipment, and a performance and restoration bond which is in existence is insufficient with respect to the additional equipment in the sole determination of the city, the permit applicant may be required by the city to post an additional performance and restoration bond in accordance with § 96.06. (1993 Code, § 1165.10) 254 Right-of-Way Management 13     § 96.13 ISSUANCE OF PERMIT; CONDITIONS. (A) If the city determines that the applicant has satisfied the requirements of this chapter, the city may issue a permit. (B) The city may impose any reasonable conditions upon the insurance of a permit and the performance of the applicant thereunder in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, to ensure the structural integrity of the right-of-way, to protect the property and safety of other users of the right-of-way, to minimize the disruption and inconvenience to the traveling public, and to otherwise efficiently manage use of the right-of-way. (C) Small Wireless Facility Conditions. In addition to subdivision 2, the erection or installation of a wireless support structure, the collocation of a small wireless facility, or other installation of a small wireless facility in the right-of-way, shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on the particular wireless support structure, under those attachment specifications, and at the height indicated in the applicable permit application. 2) No new wireless support structure installed within the right-of-way shall exceed 50 feet in height without the city’s written authorization, provided that the city may impose a lower height limit in the applicable permit to protect the public health, safety and welfare or to protect the right-of- way and its current use, and further provided that a registrant may replace an existing wireless support structure exceeding 50 feet in height with a structure of the same height subject to such conditions or requirements as may be imposed in the applicable permit. 3) No wireless facility may extend more than 10 feet above its wireless support structure. 4) Where an applicant proposes to install a new wireless support structure in the right-of-way, the city may impose separation requirements between such structure and any existing wireless support structure or other facilities in and around the right-of-way. 5) Where an applicant proposes collocation on a decorative wireless support structure, sign or other structure not intended to support small wireless facilities, the city may impose reasonable requirements to accommodate the particular design, appearance or intended purpose of such structure. 6) Where an applicant proposes to replace a wireless support structure, the city may impose reasonable restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements on the replacement of such structure. Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.163, Subd. 3b. Small Wireless Facility Agreement. A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on a small wireless support structure owned or controlled by the city, or any other city asset in the right-of-way, after the applicant has executed a standard small wireless facility collocation agreement with the city. The standard collocation agreement shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the required small wireless facility permit, provided, however, that the applicant shall not be additionally required to obtain a license or franchise in order to collocate. Issuance of a small wireless facility permit does not supersede, alter or affect any then-existing agreement between the city and applicant, Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.163, Subd. 6(g). 255   (D) Action on Small Wireless Facility Permit Applications. 1. Deadline for Action. The city shall approve or deny a small wireless facility permit application within 90 days after filing of such application. The small wireless facility permit, and any associated building permit application, shall be deemed approved if the city fails to approve or deny the application within the review periods established in this section. 2. Consolidated Applications. An applicant may file a consolidated small wireless facility permit application addressing the proposed collocation of up to 15 small wireless facilities, or a greater number if agreed to by a local government unit, provided that all small wireless facilities in the application: a) are located within a two-mile radius; b) consist of substantially similar equipment; and c) are to be placed on similar types of wireless support structures. In rendering a decision on a consolidated permit application, the city may approve some small wireless facilities and deny others, but may not use denial of one or more permits as a basis to deny all small wireless facilities in the application. (E) Tolling of Deadline. The 90-day deadline for action on a small wireless facility permit application may be tolled if: (1) The city receives applications from one or more applicants seeking approval of permits for more than 30 small wireless facilities within a seven-day period. In such case, the city may extend the deadline for all such applications by 30 days by informing the affected applicants in writing of such extension. (2) The applicant fails to submit all required documents or information and the city provides written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within 30 days of receipt the application. Upon submission of additional documents or information, the city shall have ten days to notify the applicant in writing of any still-missing information. (3) The city and a small wireless facility applicant agree in writing to toll the review period. Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.163, Subd. 3c. (1993 Code, § 1165.11)     § 96.14 PERMIT FEES. (A) Excavation permit fee. The excavation permit fee shall be imposed by the city in an amount sufficient to recover the following costs: (1) The city cost; (2) The degradation of the right-of-way that will result from the excavation; and (3) Restoration, if done or caused to be done by the city. (B) Disruption fees. The city may establish and impose a disruption fee as a penalty for unreasonable delays in excavations, obstructions, or restoration. (C) Obstruction Permit Fee. The city shall impose an obstruction permit fee in an amount sufficient 256 Right-of-Way Management 15     to recover management costs. (D) Payment of permit fees. No excavation permit or obstruction permit shall be issued without payment of all fees required prior to the issuance of the permit unless the applicant shall agree (in manner, amount, and substance acceptable to the city) to pay the fees within 30 days of billing therefor. All permit fees shall be doubled during a probationary period. Permit fees that were paid for a permit which was revoked for a breach are not refundable. Any refunded permit fees shall be less all city cost up to and including the date of refund. (E) Use of permit fees. All obstruction and excavation permit fees shall be used solely for city management, construction, maintenance, and restoration costs of the right-of-way. (F) Application to Franchises. Unless otherwise agreed to in a franchise, management costs may be charged separately from and in addition to the franchise fees imposed on a right-of-way user in the franchise. (1993 Code, § 1165.12) § 96.15 RIGHT-OF-WAY RESTORATION. (A) Timing. The work to be done under the excavation permit, and the repair and restoration of the right-of-way as required herein, must be completed within the dates specified in the permit, increased by as many days as work could not be done because of extraordinary circumstances beyond the control of the permit holder or when work was prohibited as unseasonable or unreasonable under § 96.18. In addition to repairing its own work, the permit holder must restore the general work area of the work, and the surrounding areas, including the paving and its foundations, to the same condition that existed before the commencement of the work and must inspect the area of work and use reasonable care to maintain the same condition for 36 months thereafter. (B) Repair and restoration. The permit holder shall repair its own work. In addition, in its application for an excavation permit, the permit holder may choose either to have the city restore the right-of-way or to restore the right-of-way itself. (1) City restoration. If the permit holder chooses to have the city restore the right-of-way, the permit holder shall pay the costs thereof within 30 days of billing. If, during the 36 months following the restoration, the pavement settles due to the permit holder’s improper backfilling, the permit holder shall pay to the city, within 30 days of billing, the cost for the resultant degradation as well as for any and all additional city costs associated therewith. (2) Permit holder restoration. If the permit holder chooses at the time of application for an excavation permit to restore the right-of-way itself, the permit holder shall post an additional performance and restoration bond in an amount determined by the city to be sufficient to cover the cost of restoring the right-of-way to its pre-excavation condition. If, 36 months after completion of the restoration of the right-of-way, the city determines that the right-of-way has been properly restored, the surety on the performance and restoration bond posted pursuant to this division (B)(2) shall be released. (C) Standards. The permit holder shall perform the work according to the standards and with the materials specified by the city. The city shall have the authority to prescribe the manner and extent of the restoration, and may do so in written procedures of general application or on a case-by-case basis. The city, in exercising this authority, shall be guided but not limited by the following standards and considerations: 257   (1) The number, size, depth, and duration of the excavations, disruptions, or damage to the right-of-way; (2) The traffic volume catted by the right-of-way; the character of the neighborhood surrounding the right-of-way; (3) The pre-excavation condition of the right-of-way; remaining life expectancy of the right- of-way affected by the excavation; (4) Whether the relative cost of the method of restoration to the permit holder is in reasonable balance with the prevention of an accelerated deprecation of the right-of-way that would otherwise result from the excavation, disturbance or damage to the right-of-way; and (5) The likelihood that the particular method of restoration would be effective in slowing the deprecation of the right-of-way that would otherwise take place. (D) Guarantees. By choosing to restore the right-of-way itself, the permit holder guarantees its work and shall maintain it for 36 months following the completion. During this 36-month period, it shall, upon notification from the city, correct all restoration work to the extent necessary, using the method required by the city. The work shall be completed within 5 calendar days of the receipt of the notice from the city, not including days during which work cannot be done because of extraordinary circumstances or days when work is prohibited as unseasonable or unreasonable under § 96.18. (E) Failure to restore. If the permit holder fails to restore the right-of-way in the manner and to the condition required by the city, or fails to satisfactorily and timely complete all repairs required by the city, the city at its option may perform or cause to be performed the work. In that event, the permit holder shall pay to the city, within 30 days of billing, the cost of restoring the right-of-way. If the permit holder fails to pay as required, the city may exercise its rights under the performance and restoration bond. (F) Degradation fee in lieu of restoration. In lieu of right-of-way restoration, a permit holder shall pay to the city a degradation fee to cover city costs associated with a decrease in the useful life of a public right-of-way caused by excavation and repairs. Payment of a degradation fee does not relieve the permit holder of the obligation to make necessary right-of-way repairs. (1993 Code, § 1165.13) § 96.16 JOINT APPLICATIONS. (A) Joint application. Registrants may jointly make application for permits to excavate or obstruct the right-of-way at the same place and time. (B) With city projects. Registrants who join in and during a scheduled obstruction or excavation preformed by the city, whether or not it is a joint application by 2 or more registrants or a single application, are not required to pay the obstruction and degradation portions of the permit fee. (C) Shared fees. Registrants who apply for permits for the same obstruction or excavation, which is not preformed by the city, may share in the payment of the obstruction of excavation permit fee. Registrants must agree among themselves as to the portion each will pay indicate the same on their applications. 258 Right-of-Way Management 17     (1993 Code, § 1165.14) § 96.17 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATIONS. (A) Limitation on area. A right-of-way permit is valid only for the area of the right-of-way specified in the permit. No permit holder may perform any work outside the area specified in the permit, except as provided herein. Any permit holder which determines that an area greater than that specified in the permit must be obstructed or excavated must before working in that greater area make application for a permit extension and pay any additional fees necessitated thereby, and be granted a new permit or permit extension. (B) Limitations on dates. A right-of-way permit is valid only for the dates specified in the permit. No permit holder may begin its work before the permit start date or, except as provided therein, continue working after the end date. If permit holder does not finish the work by the permit end date, it must make application for a new permit for additional time it needs, and receive the new permit or an extension of the old permit before working after the end date of the previous permit. This supplementary application must be done before the permit end date. (1993 Code, § 1165.15) § 96.18 OTHER OBLIGATIONS. (A) Compliance with other laws. Obtaining a right-of-way permit does not relieve permit holder of its duty to obtain all other necessary permits, licenses, franchises, or other authorizations and to pay all fees required by the city, any other city, county, state, or federal rules, laws, or regulations. A permit holder shall comply with all requirements of local, state, and federal laws, including M.S. §§ 216D.01 through 216D.09, as they may be amended from time to time, (“One Call Excavation Notice System”). A permit holder shall preform all work in conformance with all applicable codes and established rules and regulations, and is responsible for all work done in the right-of-way pursuant to its permit, regardless of who performed the work. (B) Prohibited work. Except in the case of an emergency, and with the approval of the city, no right-of-way obstruction or excavation may be performed when seasonally prohibited or when conditions are unreasonable for the work. (C) Interference with right-of-way. A permit holder shall not so obstruct a right-of-way that the natural free and clear passage of water through the gutters or other waterways shall be interfered with. Private vehicles may not be parked with adjacent to a permit area. The loading or unloading of trucks adjacent to a permit area is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the permit. (1993 Code, § 1165.16) § 96.19 DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF PERMIT. (A) Reasons for Denial. The city may deny a permit for failure to meet the requirements and conditions of this chapter or if the city determines that the denial is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use. (B) Procedural Requirements. The denial or revocation of a permit must be made in writing and must document the basis for the denial. The city must notify the applicant or right-of-way user in writing within three business days of the decision to deny or revoke a permit. If an application is denied, the 259   right-of-way user may address the reasons for denial identified by the city and resubmit its application. If the application is resubmitted within 30 days of receipt of the notice of denial, no additional application fee shall be imposed. The city must approve or deny the resubmitted application within 30 days after submission..Note: Minn. Stat. § 237.163, Subds. 4(c) and 5(f). (C) Mandatory denial. Except in the case of an emergency, no right-of-way permit will be granted: (1) To any person required by § 96.06 to be registered who has not done so; (2) To any person required by § 96.10 to file an annual report but has failed to do so; (3) For any next-year project not listed in the construction and major maintenance plan required under § 96.08 unless the person used commercially reasonable efforts to anticipate and plan for the project; (4) For any project which requires the excavation of any portion of a right-of-way which was constructed or reconstructed within the preceding 5 years; (5) To any person who has failed within the past 3 years to comply, or is presently not in full compliance, with the requirements of the section; (6) To any person as whom there exists grounds for the revocation of a permit under § 96.24 (7) If, in the sole discretion of the city, the issuance of a permit for the particular date and/or time would cause a conflict to interfere with an exhibition, celebration, festival, or any other event. The city, in exercising this discretion, shall be guided by the safety and convenience of ordinary travel of the public over the right-of-way, and by considerations relating to the public health, safety, and welfare. (D) Permissive denial. The city may deny a permit in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, to prevent interference with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel over the right- of-way, or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its users. The city may consider 1 or more of the following factors: (1) The extent to which right-of-way space where the permit is sought is available; (2) The competing demands for the particular space in the right-of-way; (3) The availability of other locations in the right-of-way or in other rights-of-way equipment of the permit applicants; (4) The applicability of ordinance or other regulations of the right-of-way that affect location of equipment in the right-of-way; (5) The degree of compliance of the applicant with the terms and conditions of its franchise, if any, this chapter, and other applicable ordinances and regulations; (6) The degree of disruption to surrounding communities and businesses that will result from the use of that part of the right-of-way; (7) The condition and age of the right-of-way, and whether and when it is scheduled for 260 Right-of-Way Management 19     a total or partial reconstruction; and (8) The balancing of the costs of disruption to the public and damage to the right- of-way, against the benefits to that part of the public served by the expansion into additional parts of the right-of-way. (E) Discretionary issuance. Notwithstanding the provisions of divisions (A)(3) and (A)(4) above, the city may issue a permit in any case where the permit is necessary to prevent substantial economic hardship to a customer of the permit applicant, or to allow the customer to materially improve its utility service, or to allow a new economic development project; and where the permit applicant did not have knowledge of the hardship, the plans for improvement of service, or the development project when the applicant was required to submit its lists of next-year projects. (F) Permits for additional next-year projects. Notwithstanding the provisions of division (A)(3) above, the city may issue a permit to a registrant who was allowed under § 96.10 to submit an additional next-year project, or in the event the registrant demonstrates that it is used commercially reasonable efforts to anticipate and plan for the project, the permit to be subject to all other conditions and requirements of law, including the conditions as may be imposed under § 96.13. (1993 Code, § 1165.17) § 96.20 INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. In accordance with M.S. §§ 237.162, Subd. 8(3) and 237.163, Subd 8, as they may be amended from time to time; and other provisions of law, and until the Public Utilities Commission adopts uniform statewide standards, the excavation, restoration, and all other work performed in the right-of-way shall be done in conformance with the Standard Specifications for Street Openings as promulgated by the city and at a location as may be required by § 96.27. The city may enforce local standards prior to adoption of mandatory, preemptive statewide standards pursuant to its inherent and historical police power authority. (1993 Code, § 1165.18) § 96.21 INSPECTION. (A) Notice of completion of work. When the work under any permit hereunder is completed, the permit holder shall notify the city. (B) Site inspection. The permit holder shall make the work-site available to the City Inspector and to all others as authorized by law for inspection at all reasonable times during the execution and upon completion of the work. (C) Authority of City Inspector. At the time of inspection the City Inspector may order the immediate cessation of any work which poses a serious threat to life, health, safety, or well-being of the public. The City Inspector may issue an order to the registrant for any work which does not conform to the applicable standards, conditions, or codes. The order shall state that failure to correct the 261   violation will be cause for revocation of the permit. Within 10 days after issuance of the order, the registrant shall present proof to the city that the violation has been corrected. If the proof has not been presented within the required time, the city may revoke the permit pursuant to § 96.24. (1993 Code, § 1165.19) § 96.22 WORK DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. (A) Emergency situations. (1) Each registrant shall immediately notify the city of the city’s designee of any event regarding its equipment which it considers to be an emergency. The registrant may proceed to take whatever actions are necessary in order to respond to the emergency. Within 2 business days after the occurrence of the emergency, the registrant shall apply for the necessary permits, pay the fees associated therewith and fulfill the rest of the requirements necessary to bring itself into compliance with this chapter for the actions it took in response to the emergency. (2) In the event that the city becomes aware of an emergency regarding a registrant’s equipment, the city may attempt to contact the local representative of each registrant affected, or potentially affected, by the emergency. In any event, the city may take whatever action it deems necessary in order to respond to the emergency, the cost of which shall borne by the registrant whose equipment occasioned the emergency. (B) Non-emergency situations. Except in the case of an emergency, any person who, without first having obtained the necessary permit, obstructs or evacuates a right-of-way must subsequently obtain a permit, pay double the normal fee for the permit, pay double all the other fees required by city ordinance, necessary to correct any damage to the right-of-way and comply with all the requirements of this chapter. (1993 Code, § 1165.20) § 96.23 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTIFICATION. If the obstruction or excavation of the right-of-way begins later or sooner than the date given on the permit, the permit holder shall notify the city of the accurate information as soon as this information is known. (1993 Code, § 1165.21) § 96.24 REVOCATION OF PERMITS. (A) Substantial breach. Registrants hold permits issued pursuant to this code as a privilege and not as a right. The city reserves the right, as provided herein and in accordance with M.S. § 237.163, Subd.4, as it may be amended from time to time, to revoke any right-of-way permit, without fee refund, 262 Right-of-Way Management 21     in the event of a substantial breach of the term and conditioned of any statute, ordinance, rule, or regulation, or any condition of the permit. A substantial breach by permit holder shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The violation of any material provision of the right-of-way permit; (2) An evasion or attempt to evade any material provision of the right-of-way permit, or the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any fraud or deceit upon the city or its citizens; (3) Any material misrepresentation of fact in the application for a right-of-way permit; (4) The failure to maintain the required bonds and/or insurance; (5) The failure to complete the work in a timely manner; or (6) The failure to correct a condition indicated on an order issued pursuant to § 96.21. (B) Written notice of breach. If the city determines that the permit holder has committed a substantial breach of a term or condition of any statue, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any condition of the permit, the city shall make a written demand upon the permit holder to remedy the violation. The demand shall state that continued violations may be cause for revocation of the permit. Further, a substantial breach, as stated above, will allow the city, at the city’s discretion, to place additional or revised conditions on the permit. (C) Response to notice of breach. Within 24 hours of receiving notification of the breach, permit holder shall contact the city with a plan, acceptable to the City Inspector, for its correction. The permit holder’s failure to so contact the City Inspector, the permit holder’s failure to submit an acceptable plan, or the permit holder’s failure to reasonably implement the approved plan shall be cause for immediate revocation of the permit. Further, permit holder’s failure to so contact the City Inspector, or the permit holder’s failure to reasonably implement the approved plan shall automatically place the permit holder on probation for 1 full year. (D) Cause for probation. From time to time, the city may establish a list of conditions of the permit which, if breached, will automatically place the permit holder on probation for 1 full year, such as, but not limited to, working out of the allotted time period or working on right-of-way outside of the permit. (E) Automatic revocation. If a permit holder, while on probation, commits a breach as outlined above, permit holder’s permit will automatically be revoked and permit holder will not be allowed further permits for 1 full year, except for emergency’s repairs. (F) Reimbursement of city costs. If a permit os revoked, the permit holder shall also reimburse the city for the city’s reasonable costs, including restoration costs and the costs of collection and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the revocation. (1993 Code, § 1165.22) 263   § 96.25 APPEALS. (A) Appeal process. If an applicant has been denied registration of a right-of-way permit, its right-of-way permit revoked, or believes that the fees imposed on the user by the city do not conform to the requirements of law, the applicant may have the denial, revocation, or fee imposition reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council. The City Council shall act on a timely written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting. A decision by the City Council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition must be in writing and supported by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision. (B) Appeal costs. Each party to the arbitrators shall pay its own costs, disbursements, and attorney fees. (1993 Code, § 1165.23) § 96.26 MAPPING DATA. (A) Information required. Except as provided in division (B) below, each registrant shall provided to the city information indicating the horizontal and vertical location, relative to the boundaries of the right-of-way, of all equipment which it owns or over which it has control and which is located in any right-of-way (“Mapping Data”). Mapping data shall be provided with the specificity and in the format requested by the city for inclusion in the mapping system used by the city. Notwithstanding the foregoing, mapping data shall be submitted by all registrants for all equipment which is to be installed or constructed after the date of passage of this chapter at the time any permits are sought under this chapter. (B) Supplemental information. Within 6 months of the acquisition, installation, of construction of additional equipment or any relocation, abandonment, or disuse of excavating equipment, each registrant shall supplement the mapping data required herein. (C) Comprehensive equipment plans. (1) Each registrant shall, within 6 months after the date of passage of this chapter, submit a plan to the city specifying in detail the steps it will take economically with the requirements of this chapter. This plan shall provide for the submission of all mapping data for commercial and industrial zoning districts within 2 years after the date of passage of this chapter, and for the remainder of the city as early as may be reasonable and practical, but not later than 5 years after the date of passage of this ordinance for the remainder of the city as early as may be reasonable and practical, but not later than 5 years after the date of passage of this chapter. (2) After 6 months after the passage of this chapter, a new registrant, or a registrant which has not submitted a plan as required above, shall submit complete and accurate mapping data for all its equipment at the time any permits are sought under this chapter. 264 Right-of-Way Management 23     (D) Telecommunications equipment. Information on existing facilities and equipment of telecommunications right-of-way users need only be supplied in the form maintained by the telecommunications right-of-way user. (E) Trade secret information. At the request of any registrant, any information requested by the city, which qualifies as a “trade secret” under M.S. § 13.37(b), as it may be amended from time to time, shall be treated as trade secret information as detailed therein. With respect to the provision of mapping data, the city may consider unique circumstances from time to time required to obtain mapping data. (1993 Code, § 1165.24) § 96.27 LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT. (A) Undergrounding. Unless otherwise permitted by an existing franchise or M.S. § 216B.34, as it may be amended from time to time, or unless existing above-ground equipment is repaired or replaced, or unless infeasible such as in the provision of electric service at certain voltages, new construction, installation of new equipment, and the replacement of old equipment shall be done underground or contained within buildings or other structures in conformity with applicable codes unless otherwise agreed to by the city in witting, and the agreement is reflected in applicable permits. (B) Corridors. The city may assign specific corridors within the right-of-way, or any particular segment thereof as may be necessary, for each type of equipment that is or, pursuant to current technology, the city expects will someday be located within the right-of-way. Excavation, obstruction, or other permits issued by the city for good involving the installation or replacement of equipment may designate the proper corridor for the equipment at issue and the equipment must be located accordingly. (C) Moving of existing equipment to corridors. Any registrant whose equipment is located, prior to enactment of this chapter, in the right-of-way in a position at variance with corridors established by the city shall, no later than at a time of the next reconstruction of excavation of the area where its equipment is located, move that equipment to its assigned position within the right-of-way, unless this requirement is waived by the city for good cause shown, upon consideration of factors such as the remaining economic life of the facilities, public safety, customer service needs, and headship to the registrant. (D) Nuisance. One year after the passage of this chapter, any equipment found in a right-of-way that has not been registered shall be deemed to be a nuisance. The city may exercise any remedies or rights it has at law or in equity, including, but not limited to, abating the nuisance or taking possession of the equipment and restoring the right-of-way to a usable condition. (E) Limitation of space. To protect health, safety, and welfare, the city shall have the power to prohibit or limit the placement of new additional equipment within the right-of-way if there is insufficient space to accommodate all of the requests of registrant or persons to occupy and use the right-of-way. In making the decisions, the city shall strive to the extent possible to accommodate all existing and 265   potential users of the right-of-way, but shall be guided primarily by considerations of public interest, the public’s needs for the particular service, the condition of the right-of-way, the time of year with respect to essential utilities, the protection of existing equipment in the right-of-way, and future city plans for public improvements and development projects which have been determined to be the public interest. (1993 Code, § 1165.25) § 96.28 RELOCATION OF EQUIPMENT. (A) A registrant must promptly and at its own expense, with due regard for seasonal working conditions, permanently remove and relocate its equipment and facilities in the right-of-way whenever the city requests the removal and relocation, and shall restore the right-of-way to the same condition it was in prior to the removal or relocation. The city may make the requests in order to prevent inference by the company’s equipment or facilities with a present or future city use of the right-of-way; a public improvement undertaken by the city; an economic development project in which the city has an interest or investment; when the public health, safety and welfare requires it; or when necessary to prevent interference with the safety and convenience or ordinary travel over the right-of-way. (B) Notwithstanding the forgoing, a person shall not be required to remove of relocate its equipment from any right-of-way which has been vacated in favor of nongovernmental entity to the person therefor. (1993 Code, § 1165.26) § 96.29 PRE-EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT LOCATION. In addition to complying with the requirements of M.S. § 216D.01-09, as it may be amended from time to time, before the start date of any right-of-way excavation, each registrant who has equipment located in the area to be excavated shall mark the horizontal and approximate vertical placement of all the equipment. Any registrant whose equipment is less than 20 inches below a concrete or asphalt surface shall notify and work closely with the excavation contractor in an effort to establish the exact location of its equipment and the best procedure for excavation. (1993 Code, § 1165.27) § 96.30 DAMAGE TO OTHER EQUIPMENT. (A) Maintenance work by city. When the city performs work in the right-of-way and finds it necessary to maintain, support, or move a registrant’s equipment in order to protect it, the city shall notify the local representative as early as is reasonably possible. The costs associated therewith will be billed to that registrant and must be paid within 30 days from the date of billing. 266 Right-of-Way Management 25     (B) Responsibility of registrant. Each registrant shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any equipment in the right-of-way which it or its equipment damages. Each registrant shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any damage to the equipment of another registrant cause during the city’s response to an emergency occasioned by that registrant’s equipment. (1993 Code, § 1165.28) § 96.31 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION. (A) Reservation of right. If the city vacates a right-of-way which contains the equipment of a registrant, and if the vacation does not require the relocation of registrant or permit holder equipment, the city shall reserve, to and for itself and all registrant having equipment in the vacated right-of-way, the right to install, maintain, and operate any equipment in the vacated right-of-way and to enter upon the right-of-way at any time for the purpose of reconstructing, inspecting, maintaining, or repairing the same. (B) Relocation of equipment. If the vacation requires the relocation of the registrant or permit holder equipment and; if the vacation proceedings are initiated by the registrant or permit holder, the registrant or permit holder must pay the relocation costs; or if the vacation proceedings are initiated by the city and the registrant or permit holder must pay the relocation costs unless otherwise agreed to by the city and the registrant to permit holder; or if the vacation proceeding are initiated by a person or persons other than the registrant or permit holder, the person or persons must pay the relocation costs. (1993 Code, § 1165.29) § 96.32 INDEMNIFICATION AND LIABILITY. (A) Limitation of liability. By reason of the acceptance of a registration or a grant of the right-of- way permit, the city does not assume any liability; for injuries to persons, damage to property, or loss of service claims by parties other than the registrant or the city; or for claims or penalties of any sort resulting from the installation, presence, maintenance, or operation of equipment by registrants or activities of registrants. (B) Indemnification. By registering with the city, a registrant agrees, or by accepting a permit under this chapter, a permit holder is required to defend, indemnify, and hold the city whole and harmless from all costs, liabilities, and claims for damages of any kind arising out of the construction, presence, installation, maintenance, repair, or operation of its equipment, or out of any activity undertaken in or near a right-of-way, whether or not any act or omission complained of is authorized, allowed, or prohibited by a right-of-way permit. It further agrees that it will not bring, nor cause to be brought, any action, suit, or other proceeding claiming damages, or seeking any other relief against the city for any claim nor for any award arising out of the presence, installation, maintenance, or operation of its equipment, or any activity undertaken in or near a right-of-way, whether or not the act or omission 267   complained of is authorized, allowed, or prohibited by right-of-way permit. The foregoing does not indemnify the city for its own negligence except for the claims arising out of or alleging the city’s negligence where the negligence arises out of or is primarily related to the presence, installation, construction, operation, maintenance, or repair of the equipment by the registrant or on the registrant’s behalf, including, but not limited to, the insurance of permits and inspection of plans or work. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the registrant or to the city; and the registrant, in defending any action on behalf of the city, shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that the city could assert in its own behalf. (1993 Code, § 1165.30) § 96.33 FUTURE USES. In placing any equipment, or allowing it to be placed, in the right-of-way, the city is not liable for any damages caused thereby to any registrant’s equipment which is already in place. No registrant is entitled to rely on the provisions of this section, and no special duty is created as to registrant. This section is enacted to protect the general health, welfare, and safety of the public at large. (1993 Code, § 1165.31) § 96.34 ABANDONED AND UNUSABLE EQUIPMENT. (A) Discontinued operations. A registrant who has determined to discontinue its operations with respect to any equipment in any right-of-way, or segment or portion thereof, in the city must either: (1) Provide information satisfactory to the city that the registrant’s obligations for its equipment in the right-of-way under this chapter have been lawfully assumed by either registrant; or (2) Submit to the city a proposal and instruments for transferring ownership of its equipment to the city. If a registrant proceeds under this clause, the city may, at its option: (a) Purchase the equipment; (b) Require the registrant, at its own expense, to remove it; or (c) Require the registrant to post an additional bond or an increased bond amount sufficient to reimburse to city for reasonably anticipated costs to be incurred in removing the equipment. (B) Abandoned equipment. A registrant’s equipment that fails to comply with division (C) below and which has remained unused for 2 years shall be deemed to be abandoned. Abandoned equipment is deemed to be a nuisance. The city may exercise any remedies or rights it has a law or in equity, including, but not limited to: (1) Abating the nuisance; (2) Taking possession of the equipment and restoring it to a usable condition; (3) Requiring removal of the equipment by the registrant or by the registrant’s surety; or 268 Right-of-Way Management 27     (4) Exercising its rights pursuant to the performance and restoration bond. (C) Removal. Any registrant who has unusable equipment in any right-of-way shall remove it from that right-of-way during the next scheduled excavation, unless this requirement is waived by the city. (1993 Code, § 1165.32) § 96.35 RESERVATION OF REGULATORY AND POLICE POWERS. The city, by granting of a right-of way permit, or by registering a person under this section, does not surrender or to any extent lose, waive, impair, or lessen the lawful powers and rights, which it has now or may be hereafter vested in the city under the Constitution and Statues of the State of Minnesota to regulate the use of the right-of-way by permit holder; and the permit holder by its acceptance of a right-of-way permit or of registration under those ordinances agrees that all lawful powers and rights, regulatory power, or police power, or otherwise as are or the same may be from time to time vested in or reserved to the city, shall be in full force and effect and subject to the exercise thereof by the city at any time. A permit holder or registrant is deemed to acknowledged that its rights are subject to the regulatory and police powers of the city to adopt and enforce general ordinances necessary to the safety and welfare of the public and is deemed to agree to comply with all applicable general laws and ordinances enacted by the city pursuant to the powers. Any conflict between the provisions of a registration or of a right-of-way permit and any other present or future lawful exercise of the city’s regulatory or police powers shall be resolved in favor of the latter. (1993 Code, § 1165.33) § 96.36 SEVERABILITY. If any division, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and the holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. If regulatory body or a court of competent jurisdiction should determine by a final, nonappealable order that any permit, right, or registration issued under this chapter or any portion of this chapter is illegal or unenforceable, then any such permit right or registration granted or deemed to exist hereunder shall be considered as a revocable permit with mutual right in either party to terminate without cause giving 60 days written notice to the other. The requirements and conditions of such a revocable permit shall be the same requirements and conditions as set forth in the permit, right or registration, respectively, except for the conditions relating to the term of the permit and the right of termination. If a permit, right or registration shall be considered a revocable permit as provided herein, the permit holder must acknowledge the authority of the City Council to issue the revokable permit and the power to revoke it. Nothing in this chapter precludes the city from requirements set forth herein. (1993 Code, § 1165.34) § 96.37 NONEXCLUSIVE REMEDY. The remedies provided in this chapter and other chapters in the Legislative Code are not exclusive or in lieu of other right and remedied that the city may have at law or in equity. The city is hereby authorized to seek legal and equitable relief for actual of threatened injury to the public rights-of-way, 269 including damages to the rights-of-way, whether or not caused by a violation of any of the provisions of this chapter or other provisions of the Legislative Code. (1993 Code, § 1165.35) Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective as of its publication. First Reading: March 26, 2019 Second Reading: Waived Adopted: April 9, 2019 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE By:_________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: By:_________________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin Publication Date: April 17, 2019 270 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-037 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION FOR ORDINANCE 2019-05 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony has adopted the above referenced ordinance amending Chapter 96 Right of Way Management; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing maps or charts; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent of Ordinance 2019-05. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: the following summary of Ordinance 2019-05 shall be published in the official paper in lieu of the entire ordinance. SUMMARY PUBLICATION Ordinance 2019-05 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 96 Right of Way Management; The City Council of the City of St. Anthony adopted Ordinance 2019-05 on April 9, 2019, this ordinance amends Chapter 96 Right of Way Management as it relates to Small Wireless Facilities. The full Ordinance is available for review at City Hall, St. Anthony City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418. Adopted this 9th day of April, 2019. _________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Reviewed for administration: _________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 271 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 272 March 2019 Programming, Website & Social Media Website (2/14 launch) Feb 14 - Feb 28 March Total Visitors 1,369 1,563 St. Anthony/CTV Landing (Page Views) 46 76 St. Anthony – Meeting 92 74 St. Anthony – City Council 65 108 Social Media January February March CTV Facebook posts 56 79 85 CTV Facebook Total Likes 789 824 838 PROGRAMMING • PRODUCTION SERVICES: ü “Points of Light” {3/28} featuring local churches LIVE @ CTV Studios Ø Including SA churches: Faith United; Joy World and business Washburn-McReavy ü “SA Cops vs. Kids Basketball Feature” - March 5 (1:46) ü “SA Cops vs. Kids Basketball” (7) Full Games – March 5 ü “Saint Anthony Civic Orchestra” - March 3 ü “Tuesday with a Scholar” Ramsey County Library: 3/5, 3/12, 3/19, 3/26 Ø (4) programs: U/M professor Howard Lavine & Macalester prof. Jim Stewart • NEW PROGRAMS on CTV CHANNELS (80 Total) = 110 hours of programming • CITY MEETINGS (44 Total): 4 – St. Anthony city meetings – web streams • NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Meeting [Live] – March 7 • RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD MEETINGS: 3/5, 3/12, 3/19, 3/26 [Live Ch19 – 9am] • SA 282 SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS: 3/5 [Live Ch. 20 & web] • RICE CREEK WATERSHED Meetings: 3/1 & 3/13 273 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 274 Date Type Staff Present April 23 Regular Arbor Day Proclamation 1st Quarter Goals Update Students in Governement Presentation Parks Commission Code Amendment-Final Reading and Adoption City Council City Manager City Planner April 30 Special 5:30 p.m.Worksession-Joint Meeting with School Board City Council City Manager April 30 Special 7:00 p.m.Worksession City Council City Manager May 14 Regular Planning Commission items from April Chamber of the Year and Business of the Year Finance Annual Report City Council City Manager Finance Director May 20 Special 4:30 p.m.Tour of the City City Council City Manager May 28 Regular Salo Park Concert Series Insurance Renewal Tort Limits - Consent Order 2021 Street & Utility Recon Feasibility Study 35W Gateway Project 2019 Street Projects Call for Sale of Bonds City Council City Manager City Engineer June 3 Special 5:30 p.m.Worksession City Council City Manager June 11 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council City Manager June 25 Regular Audit Presentation 2019 Street Projects Approve Sale of Bonds City Council City Manager Finance Director July 9 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS 2019 275 Date Type Staff Present FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS July 23 Regular Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Liquor Operations Mid Year Report VillageFest Presentation City Council City Manager Police Chief Liquor Op Mgr August 13 Regular Planning Commission items from July SANB #282 Presentation City Council City Manager August 27 Regular Budget Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director September 10 Regular Planning Commission items from August 2020 Preliminary Operating Budget and Levy-Public Hearing Kiwanis Peanut Day Approve 2020 Street & Utility Recon Feasibility Study & order 2020 Plans and Specs City Council City Manager Finance Director City Engineer September 24 Regular Fire Prevention Presentation City Council City Manager Fire Dept October 8 Regular Planning Commission items from September Quarterly Donations & Grants Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Waste Hauler Accounts-Consent Agenda Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Utility Accounts-Consent Agenda Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager October 22 Regular Approval of CIP City Council City Manager Finance Director November 12 Regular Planning Commission items from October 1st Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater-Public Hearing City Council City Manager November 26 Regular Fire Prevention Poster Winners Water Conservation Poster Winners 2nd Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater Authorizing polling places for 2020 City Council City Manager Fire Dept Public Works Director December 10 Regular Planning Commission items from November Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs Setting Salary of City Manager Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds Setting the 2020 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy -Public Hearing Final Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater 2020 Fee Schedule 2020 Street Project Approve Plans & Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids Approval of 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan (motion only) City Council City Manager Finance Director City Engineer 276 Date Type Staff Present FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS December 23 Regular City Council City Manager January 14 Regular Planning Commission items from December Housekeeping Resolutions Resolution for the Street Improvement Bond Reimbursement Quarterly Donations & Grants City Council City Manager January ?Special 9:00 a.m.Goal Setting City Council City Manager Dept Heads January ?Special 9:00 a.m.Goal Setting City Council City Manager Dept Heads January 28 Regular 2020 Parks Commission Work Plan- (motion only) NYFS Agreement City Council City Manager February 11 Regular Planning Commission items from January 2020 Street Project Call for Hearing on Improvements, Call for Hearing on Assessments, Order Preparation of Assessments City Council City Manager City Engineer February 25 Regular Administration Annual Report Adoption of Strategic Plan City Council City Manager March 10 Regular Planning Commission Items from February Liquor Annual Report Fire Annual Report Liquor License Renewals GreenCorp Member application-resolution City Council City Manager Fire Dept Liquor Op Manager March 24 Regular Police Annual Report Wyland Water Challenge Public Hearing-Budget Calendar 2020 Street Project Public Hearing, Order Improvements, Adopt & Confirm Assessments, Award Contract for Construction, Call for Sale of GO Bonds City Council City Manager Police Dept Finance Director April 14 Regular Planning Commission Items from March Quarterly Donations & Grants Public Works Annual Report Spirit of St. Anthony Award Award Contracts for construction, Call for Sale of GO Bonds City Council City Manager Public Works Director City Engineer 2020 277