The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC PACKET 05142019 If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313 or email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe. Call to Order. Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on all of the following items: I.Approval of the May 14, 2019, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.) II.Proclamations and Recognitions. III.Consent Agenda. These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. A.Approval of April 23, 2019, City Council meeting minutes. (pp.1-4) B.Licenses and Permits. (pp.5-6) C.Claims. (pp.7-9) D.Resolution 19-041 a resolution regarding Renewal of Municipal Insurance Coverage and the Non Waiver of Tort Liability for the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. (pp.11) E.Resolution 19-042 a resolution to approve a request to keep six (6) female chickens in an R-1 zoning district at 3612 Coolidge Street. (pp.13-19) IV.Public Hearing. V.Reports from Commission and Staff. A.Resolution 19-043 a resolution approving a request for a 5.3 foot variance from the required front yard set setback for a front stoop, denying a request for a 1.6% variance from the impervious surface standard of 35%, and denying a request for a variance to the required side yard setback of 5 feet for patio areas, located in the R-1 district at 2609 Pahl Avenue. Marcey Westrick, Planning Commissioner presenting. (pp.21-59) VI.General Business of Council. A.Resolution 19-044 a resolution Authorizing the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Silver Lake Village Multifamily Redevelopment. Todd Hubmer, City Engineer presenting. (pp.61-65) B.Ordinance 2019-06 an ordinance amending Chapter 112 Alcoholic Beverages. Mark Casey, City Manager presenting. (1st of 3 readings) (pp.67-74) CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MAY 14, 2019 7:00 p.m. HRA meeting immediately after council meeting If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313 or email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe. VII. Reports from City Manager and Council members. VIII. Community Forum Individuals may address the City Council about any City business item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk’s record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. IX. Information and Announcements X. Adjournment CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 2 APRIL 23, 2019 3 4 CALL TO ORDER. 5 6 Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7 8 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 9 10 Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 11 12 ROLL CALL. 13 14 Present: Mayor Faust, Councilmembers Gray, Jenson, Randle and Stille. 15 Absent: None 16 Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey and Parks Commission Chair Erin Jordahl Redlin 17 18 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 19 ITEMS. 20 21 I. APPROVAL OF APRIL 23, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 22 23 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City 24 Council Meeting Agenda of April 23, 2019 as presented. 25 26 Motion carried 5-0. 27 28 II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS 29 30 A. Students in Government Presentation 31 32 This item was delayed in the meeting until all students were present. 33 34 City Manager Casey invited the students to approach the podium. A photograph of the students 35 was shown. A special thank you was given to Councilmember Stille for his assistance during the 36 mock City Council Meeting and answering questions of the students. 37 38 Stuart Scamehorn provided some comments on his experience. He also has participated twice in 39 the program. 40 41 Gabby Herlofsky noted this was her second time participating in the program. 42 43 Councilmember Stille stated the program helped him and he enjoyed his participation. The 44 students debated four different issues. 45 46 Mayor Faust stated this is the third Student in Government Meeting and the second one this 47 school year. He is impressed with the students and their willingness to learn. 48 49 1 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 2 1 B. Arbor Day Proclamation 2 3 Parks Commission Chair Erin Jordahl Redlin stated St. Anthony is a Tree City USA and has 4 been since 2016. She reviewed some events that will occur for Arbor Day. 5 6 Councilmember Randle read the proclamation for Arbor Day from the last Friday in April 7 through the month of May. April 26, 2019 is St. Anthony Arbor Day and the month of May 8 2019 is Arbor Month in St. Anthony Village. 9 10 Ms. Jordahl Redlin stated Citizens for Sustainability are organizing a parks clean-up on 11 Saturday, April 27. More information can be found on the Citizens for Sustainability Facebook 12 page. Mayor Faust encouraged residents to help in their neighborhood parks. 13 14 III. CONSENT AGENDA. 15 16 A. Approval of April 9, 2019 City Council Meeting Minutes. 17 B. Licenses and Permits. 18 C. Claims. 19 20 Motion by Councilmember Randle, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve the Consent 21 Agenda items. 22 23 Motion carried 5-0. 24 25 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS – NONE 26 27 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF – NONE. 28 29 VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. 30 31 A. Resolution 19-038; a Resolution to Approve Special Event at The Unofficial on June 29, 32 2019 33 34 City Manager Casey explained that before Council is a request from Chris Christopherson for 35 their annual customer appreciation event at The Unofficial Dive Bar & Grill on Saturday, June 29, 36 2019 from 2:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The event will be held in the parking lot and include selling of 37 food and alcohol, amplified live music, seating, and tables. The police department reported one 38 call was received regarding excessive noise from last year’s event. A layout of the event was 39 provided for Council consideration. 40 41 Motion by Councilmember Randle, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 19-42 038; a Resolution to Approve Special Event at The Unofficial on June 29, 2019. 43 44 Motion carried 5-0. 45 46 2 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 3 1 B. Resolution 19-039; a Resolution to Approve Special Event at The Unofficial on August 2 4, 2019. 3 4 City Manager Casey stated before Council is a request from Chris Christopherson for their 3rd 5 annual classic car show special event at The Unofficial Dive Bar & Grill on Sunday, August 4, 6 2019 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The event will be held in the parking lot and will include 7 selling of food and alcohol, amplified DJ music, seating and tables, and parking of 8 approximately 110 classic cars. The police department reported no complaints were received 9 from last year’s event. A layout of the event was provided for Council consideration. 10 11 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution 12 19-039; a Resolution to Approve Special Event at The Unofficial on August 4, 2019. 13 14 Motion carried 5-0. 15 16 C. Ordinance 2019-02; an Ordinance amending the Parks Commission Purpose, 17 Membership, Powers and Duties 18 19 City Manager Casey noted in front of Council is the third and final reading to the proposed 20 changes in Sections 32.20, 32.21, and 32.25 of the Parks Commission ordinance. There have 21 been no calls or letters received by City staff. Highlights on the proposed changes include: 22 • Changing the name from Parks Commission to Parks and Environmental Commission. 23 • Reducing the School District’s membership from two representatives to one. 24 • Updating the Ordinance to take in account the School District #282 Student Liaison 25 replacing the Sports Boosters representative. 26 • Including “Environmental” under the Powers and Duties section where appropriate. 27 28 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to adopt Ordinance 2019-29 02; an Ordinance amending the Parks Commission Purpose, Membership, Powers and Duties for 30 final reading and adoption. 31 Motion carried 5-0. 32 33 D. Resolution 19-040; a Resolution approving summary publication of Ordinance 2019-02. 34 35 City Manager Casey reviewed the ordinance will take effect upon publication in the official City 36 newspaper, St. Anthony Bulletin. The entire ordinance is available on the City website. 37 38 Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Randle, to approve Resolution 39 19-040; a Resolution approving summary publication of Ordinance 2019-02. 40 41 Motion carried 5-0. 42 43 E. 1st Quarter Goals Update 44 45 City Manager Casey provided Council with an update on the 77 Strategic Initiatives. 46 3 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 4 1 Councilmember Stille asked about the 1.4 Dioxane and Mr. Casey provided an explanation. 2 3 Mayor Faust stated taking the traffic counts before the MNPASS project was a good and 4 proactive approach. 5 6 VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.7 8 City Manager Casey reported on April 30, there will be a joint Council – Planning Commission 9 work session to hear a proposal from a developer on the WalMart site. There are two scheduled 10 Coffee with the Council coming up on May 18 at Emerald Park and June 15 at Autumn Woods, 11 both at 9 a.m. 12 13 Councilmember Gray reported last Saturday he attended Coffee with the Council along with 14 Councilmembers Randle and Jenson. 15 16 Councilmember Randle reported he attended Coffee with the Council and encouraged residents 17 to attend the upcoming dates. 18 19 Councilmember Jenson stated he was also at Coffee with the Council and the conversations were 20 very pleasant and informative. He noted it is a good opportunity for residents to meet the 21 Councilmembers and for Council to meet more residents. 22 23 Councilmember Stille stated he participated in the Students in Government on April 10. On April 24 17, he attended the Kiwanis Meeting. 25 26 Mayor Faust had no report. 27 28 VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM – NONE.29 30 IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS31 32 Mayor Faust announced the Water Conservation Mayor’s Challenge runs from April 1 – 30, 33 2019, noting that St. Anthony is #19 currently. 34 35 X. ADJOURNMENT. 36 37 Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m. 38 39 Respectfully submitted, 40 Debbie Wolfe 41 TimeSaver off Site Secretarial, Inc. 42 43 Mayor 44 ATTEST: 45 City Clerk 46 4 Saint Anthony Village DATE: May 14, 2019 Approved: TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: License Clerk ITEM: License and Permits for Approval: General Contractors Licenses: Electro Signs & Design, Blaine, MN Meyer Contracting, Maple Grove, MN Rainbow Treecare, Minnetonka, MN Mechanical Licenses: Glowing Hearth & Home, Jordan, MN Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, Eden Prairie, MN Commercial Rental Licenses: Applicant: Northern Gopher Enterprises Location: 3200 – 3225 Diamond Eight Ter 3804 Highcrest Rd Rental Licenses: Applicant: Walter Sentyrz Location: 2604 27th Ave NE 3401 Coolidge St NE 2508 St Anthony Blvd NE 3100 Wilson St NE Applicant: 3108 LLC Location: 3108 31st Ave NE Applicant: Allen Kluz Location: 2516 – 2518 37th Ave NE 2600 – 2602 37th Ave NE Applicant: Christopher Dennis Location: 2608 - 2610 37th Ave NE Applicant: Richard Young Location: 3523 37th Ave NE Applicant: John Spitzer Location: 3108 - 3110 39th Ave NE 5 Applicant: Ricardo Shih Location: 3200 – 3202 39th Ave NE Applicant: The Legacy of St Anthony Location: 2540 Kenzie Ter Applicant: John Tuohy Location: 2601 Pahl Ave NE Applicant: Carl Goltermann Location: 3639 Stinson Blvd NE 6 City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 5/3/2019 - 5/15/2019 May 09, 2019 07:36AM Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount 10710 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 37878 05/03/2019 1,156.00 11792 INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL #49 37879 05/03/2019 420.00 11793 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 37880 05/03/2019 867.00 10002 LOCAL UNION IAFF #3486 37881 05/03/2019 357.30 11813 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 37882 05/03/2019 32.00 12785 BENNETT, KATHLEEN 37883 05/06/2019 433.70 10436 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES 37884 05/07/2019 45.00 1118 56 BREWING 37886 05/15/2019 572.00 10011 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 37887 05/15/2019 225.39 10054 ALLIANCE MECHANICAL 37888 05/15/2019 1,046.00 10056 ALLIED MEDICAL PRODUCTS 37889 05/15/2019 118.00 1122 AM CRAFTS SPIRITS 37890 05/15/2019 96.60 1054 AMERICAN BOTTLING CO 37891 05/15/2019 296.96 10098 ARAMARK 37892 05/15/2019 285.21 1100 ARTISIAN BEER COMPANY 37893 05/15/2019 5,370.69 10115 ASPEN MILLS 37894 05/15/2019 229.65 10116 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC 37895 05/15/2019 165.51 1013 BELLBOY CORPORATION 37896 05/15/2019 3,057.78 1014 BELLBOY CORPORATION 37897 05/15/2019 500.20 1035 BERNICK'S BEVERAGE & VENDING 37898 05/15/2019 5,685.44 10172 BIFFS, INC.37899 05/15/2019 330.85 1018 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER 37900 05/15/2019 29,364.27 1011 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 37901 05/15/2019 5,247.73 1009 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 37902 05/15/2019 2,196.43 1114 CANNON RIVER WINERY 37903 05/15/2019 144.00 1017 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 37904 05/15/2019 14,024.87 10263 CENTURYLINK 37905 05/15/2019 135.85 12596 CINTAS 37906 05/15/2019 3,033.78 12150 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 37907 05/15/2019 2,399.00 10293 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 37908 05/15/2019 23,820.00 10306 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE INC 37909 05/15/2019 85.50 1010 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE COMPANY 37910 05/15/2019 1,530.00 10332 COMPTON'S COMMERCIAL CLNG. INC 37911 05/15/2019 3,578.00 12561 CORE & MAIN LP 37912 05/15/2019 5,845.00 10347 CPS DISTRIBUTORS, INC.37913 05/15/2019 188.45 1042 CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE 37914 05/15/2019 428.95 10438 D ROCK CENTER & SMALL ENG 37915 05/15/2019 154.75 10373 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 37916 05/15/2019 1,769.85 10375 DALCO 37917 05/15/2019 299.35 10415 DIRECTV INC 37918 05/15/2019 487.22 10432 DORSEY & WHITNEY 37919 05/15/2019 8,681.89 10473 EMERGENCY APPARATUS 37920 05/15/2019 391.67 10474 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC 37921 05/15/2019 425.84 10501 FASTENAL COMPANY 37922 05/15/2019 1,124.62 10511 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 37923 05/15/2019 190.49 12780 FIRST STATE RECYCLING 37924 05/15/2019 154.10 10526 FLEETPRIDE 37925 05/15/2019 195.82 11866 GALLS 37926 05/15/2019 338.16 12786 GEHRKE, DORIS 37927 05/15/2019 19.37 1110 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 37928 05/15/2019 16.93 10578 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 37929 05/15/2019 291.85 1032 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.37930 05/15/2019 685.75 10601 GROVE NURSERY 37931 05/15/2019 360.00 7 City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 5/3/2019 - 5/15/2019 May 09, 2019 07:36AM Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount 10617 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS 37932 05/15/2019 64.99 10624 HAWKINS, INC 37933 05/15/2019 8,812.47 10636 HEDBACK, ARENDT & CARLSON PLLC 37934 05/15/2019 3,500.00 10642 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT 37935 05/15/2019 3,533.61 10644 HENNEPIN CNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSN 37936 05/15/2019 100.00 10661 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 37937 05/15/2019 626.25 12711 HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE 37938 05/15/2019 910.00 1019 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 37939 05/15/2019 6,668.20 10684 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 37940 05/15/2019 274.79 2020 HUNYUCK BREWING 37941 05/15/2019 135.00 1027 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 37942 05/15/2019 2,230.61 10733 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC.37943 05/15/2019 100.00 11754 INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC.37944 05/15/2019 604.00 12315 IRC RETAIL CENTERS SALO PARK 37945 05/15/2019 2,812.32 12313 IRC RETAIL CENTERS SLV LIQ 37946 05/15/2019 2,284.83 10761 J. SPANJERS CO., INC.37947 05/15/2019 2,068.00 1016 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 37948 05/15/2019 20,399.30 1102 JOHNSON BROTHERS 37949 05/15/2019 16,393.95 1004 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.37950 05/15/2019 8,293.26 1005 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.37951 05/15/2019 7,872.31 1006 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.37952 05/15/2019 7,260.91 1044 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.37953 05/15/2019 8,209.50 10798 KONRAD MATERIAL SALES LLC 37954 05/15/2019 2,340.00 10857 LMCIT % BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS 37955 05/15/2019 904.53 10833 LMCIT %BERKLY RISK ADMIN CO 37956 05/15/2019 2,893.25 10882 MAMA 37957 05/15/2019 25.00 11985 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 37958 05/15/2019 12,769.10 10916 MENARDS LUMBER 37959 05/15/2019 23.80 10932 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 37960 05/15/2019 1,025.00 10931 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL - WASTEWATER 37961 05/15/2019 61,564.18 12783 MID AMERICA METER INC 37962 05/15/2019 700.00 2005 MILK AND HONEY CIDERS 37963 05/15/2019 300.00 10982 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 37964 05/15/2019 46.00 10994 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 37965 05/15/2019 164.00 12441 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 37966 05/15/2019 573.54 1051 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 37967 05/15/2019 1,182.00 11110 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 37968 05/15/2019 279.35 11163 OFFICE DEPOT 37969 05/15/2019 384.51 12112 OREILLY AUTO PARTS 37970 05/15/2019 76.53 11185 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.37971 05/15/2019 1,963.50 12781 PARKER, MARIAN 37972 05/15/2019 11.39 1012 PAUSTIS & SONS 37973 05/15/2019 1,936.75 11211 PETTY CASH - U.S. BANK 37974 05/15/2019 188.92 1001 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 37975 05/15/2019 4,825.81 1002 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 37976 05/15/2019 7,542.62 11227 PLUNKETT'S 37977 05/15/2019 16.67 11246 PRAXAIR 37978 05/15/2019 44.00 12747 PRECISE MRM LLC 37979 05/15/2019 100.00 2019 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 37980 05/15/2019 1,104.00 11302 RAMSEY COUNTY 37981 05/15/2019 5,849.55 12787 ROSS, BRIAN & KATHLEEN 37982 05/15/2019 181.84 12346 SHRED IT 37983 05/15/2019 35.31 2018 SMALL LOT WINES 37984 05/15/2019 92.96 8 City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY CHECK REGISTER Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 5/3/2019 - 5/15/2019 May 09, 2019 07:36AM Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount 1024 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37985 05/15/2019 1,503.92 1008 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37986 05/15/2019 2,529.23 1026 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37987 05/15/2019 11,677.28 1036 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 37988 05/15/2019 1,049.66 12080 SPORT RESOURCE GROUP INC 37989 05/15/2019 14,408.55 11452 ST ANTHONY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 37990 05/15/2019 100.00 11457 ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CENTER, LLC 37991 05/15/2019 2,216.19 11464 ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE KIWANIS 37992 05/15/2019 70.00 11502 STREICHER'S 37993 05/15/2019 1,268.50 11529 SWEEPER SERVICES 37994 05/15/2019 3,793.60 11531 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 37995 05/15/2019 581.58 12782 TATARYN, HELEN 37996 05/15/2019 51.25 11552 TESSMAN SEED INC.37997 05/15/2019 174.44 12702 TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 37998 05/15/2019 806.40 12784 TOMAN, CAROLE 37999 05/15/2019 8.43 11586 TRACY PRINTING 38000 05/15/2019 1,764.20 11595 TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC.38001 05/15/2019 21.77 11609 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR 38002 05/15/2019 600.20 11612 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY 38003 05/15/2019 150.40 11635 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIAL 38004 05/15/2019 803.25 11637 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 38005 05/15/2019 110.16 12776 US SOLAR - MN ONE MT LLC 38006 05/15/2019 5,123.91 11674 VERIZON WIRELESS 38007 05/15/2019 1,741.67 12788 VETERAN SHREDDING 38008 05/15/2019 780.00 11681 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 38009 05/15/2019 34.07 1025 VINOCOPIA 38010 05/15/2019 1,279.50 11693 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC.38011 05/15/2019 883.66 12739 WASTE MANAGEMENT 38012 05/15/2019 19.37 11704 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 38013 05/15/2019 565.80 11706 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 38014 05/15/2019 432.10 1034 WINE COMPANY/THE 38015 05/15/2019 1,489.60 1038 WINE MERCHANTS INC 38016 05/15/2019 2,724.00 11738 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.38017 05/15/2019 38,416.50 6540 Z WINES USA LLC 38018 05/15/2019 189.00 11748 ZAHL PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE CO.38019 05/15/2019 2,832.00 Grand Totals: 441,399.37 9 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 10 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-041 A RESOLUTION REGARDING RENEWAL OF MUNICIPAL INSURANCE COVERAGE AND THE NON WAIVER OF TORT LIABILITY LIMITS FOR THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves participation in the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) insurance program for the year 2019 through 2020; and WHEREAS, the City has elected to purchase excess coverage in the amount of $1,000,000.00. WHEREAS, the City DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby approves the renewal of insurance coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities for the policy period of June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020. THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby does not waive the monetary limits on tort liability established by MN statute 466.04, Subd. 7, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from the LMCIT for the policy period of June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020. Adopted this 14th day of May, 2019. _________________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Review for Administration: _________________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 11 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 12 MEMORANDUM To: St. Anthony Village Mayor & City Council From: Stephen Grittman, City Planner Date: City Council Regular Meeting for May 14, 2019 NAC Project No. 323.01 – 19.07 Request: Request to keep six (6) female chickens in an R-1 Zoning District Location: 3612 Coolidge St. NE DISCUSSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has received an inquiry from the Applicants, owners dated May 2nd, 2019 requesting a permit to keep up to six chickens at their residential property at the above address. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is surrounded primarily by single family neighborhood in all directions. The Applicants have provided a diagram of the property showing the location and dimensions of the chicken coop in relation to their property. The proposed location is along the south property lines near the side yard fence and aligned with existing vegetable gardens and a shed. The proposed structure would be 79 inches by 26.5 inches (roughly 14.5 square feet) in area, and roughly 4.3 feet tall. According to the site plan provided by the applicants, the coop would appear to be located approximately 2 feet from the side yard boundary fence and will be set back the same distance as the existing shed and vegetable gardens. For accessory buildings, a setback requirement from adjoining side and rear lot lines is 5 feet. The applicants should verify that the existing shed and the proposed coop would be shifted (if necessary) to meet the required setback. While these structures do not require building permits, zoning setbacks would still apply. The drawing provided with the application indicates that the chickens will be fully enclosed in the proposed coop. The chicken coop is made out of western red cedar wood and will be painted to blend with the existing buildings and landscape. The coop is intended to be covered with a vining plant in the spring, summer and fall to provide both shade and hide it from view. 13 Page 2 As noted, the applicants are requesting approval for six chickens. The City’s requirements will typically specify that the chickens must all be hens, no male roosters permitted on the property to avoid noise concerns. CITY CODE RELATED TO REQUEST Title IX General Regulations, Chapter 91 Animals, Section § 91.56 KEEPING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS states that “No person may keep swine, cattle, horses, goats, or more than 2 dogs or 3 dogs allowed under § 91.01 through 91.05 or fowl, within the city nearer than 500 feet to any human habitation or platted land, without approval of the City Council. The City Council may, before approving or denying any request for approval, request a report from the Health Officer concerning the effect on public health.” REQUESTED ACTION Staff has reviewed the request, and recommends approval of the request. 1. Motion to adopt a resolution approving the request to keep six female chickens on the property located at 3612 Coolidge Street NE. A draft resolution reflecting approval is attached to this staff report. This approval should be conditioned on demonstrating compliance with the required 5-foot setback applicable to both the chicken coop and the existing shed. 2. Motion to deny the request for chickens at 3612 Coolidge Street NE, and direct staff to prepare a resolution declaring terms of the same. In the event the City Council chooses denial of the request, it should clearly state its reasons for the denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution based on said findings. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Request Letter and Enclosure Diagram 14 15 16 17 18 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-042 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO KEEP SIX (6) FEMALE CHICKENS IN AN R-1 ZONING DISTRICT AT 3612 COOLIDGE STREET WHEREAS, staff received a request from Rachel and Michael Blodgett for permission to keep chickens on their property located at 3612 Coolidge Street; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Code of Ordinances, Section 91.56, Keeping of Certain Animals, specifies that livestock, including fowl, require approval from the City Council; and WHEREAS, Rachel and Michael Blodgett have submitted a written request for approval from the City Council, as outlined in Subsection 91.56, to approve their request to keep chickens; and WHEREAS, Rachel and Michael Blodgett have submitted a geographical description of the placement of the enclosure that will house the chickens in relation to their property; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County Environmental Health Division has stated that this matter is within the City’s jurisdiction and authority; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village approves the request to keep six (6) female chickens in an R-1 Zoning District at 3612 Coolidge Street. APPROVED in the regular session of the City Council on May 14, 2019. _________________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST:___________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Review for Administration: _______________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 19 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 20 MEMORANDUM To: St. Anthony Village Mayor & City Council From: Stephen Grittman, City Planner Date: City Council Meeting – May 14, 2019 NAC Project No. 323.01 – 19.01 Request: Request for Variance to Front Yard Setback Requirement; Variance to Side Yard Setback Requirement; Variance to Impervious Surface Coverage Requirement Property Address: 2609 Pahl Avenue Property PID: 07-029-23-21-0080 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The applicant has constructed an addition to the rear of an existing home at the above noted address. The addition to the one-story rambler included a large window well area to provide light to the lower level. As a part of the project, the applicant constructed walkways and a patio that were not included on the original plans. Additional proposed work includes front and rear raised landings, one of which is the construction of a front stoop that encroaches into the front yard setback. In reviewing the work, the project both as now constructed and as proposed raises three elements that require variances, as follows: A.Raised front steps that encroach farther into the required 35.9 foot front yard setback (the existing structure is currently closer than the average setback of the adjoining parcels). The proposed setback would be 25.6 feet. B.Sidewalk access between front and rear yards which expands to a patio that encroaches by 3.8 feet into the required 5 foot side yard setback, to a proposed setback of 1.2 feet (this portion was constructed but not approved previously). C.Steps, walkway, and patio which combine to increase impervious surface on the lot by 2.5% beyond the required 35% maximum coverage. Variances from each of these three standards are required to proceed with the project as planned. As the project proceeded through staff review and then to the Planning Commission, the applicants continued to modify their proposal in an attempt to lessen the degree of variance needed for both item B. (side yard) and C. (Impervious). While succeeding proposals came closer to compliance with code requirements, the impervious surface level always exceeded the 35% threshold. 21 May 14, 2019 Page 2 Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission ultimately voted to recommend approval of the front setback variance for the stoop improvements, but denial of the variance for side setback encroachment for patio, and denial of the variance to the impervious surface standard. To be noted is the issue raised by the side setback proposal. As noted in the staff report, the City requires a five foot setback for a “patio”, which is defined by usage, but no setback for sidewalk, which is undefined. Staff’s interpretation was that any surface greater than 5 feet in width constituted a patio for usage purposes, rather than a sidewalk as the applicants originally proposed. Modification of the applicant’s existing paved areas would need to occur to both avoid the patio setback encroachment, and to meet the impervious surface standard. Denial of these variances implies these modifications, which the applicants would have to demonstrate to code enforcement staff. The Planning Commission suggested that the sidewalk/patio discussion be included in a discussion of potential zoning ordinance amendments, which the Commission will be convening at a workshop meeting on May 21. Staff has reviewed for height, yard setbacks, and other zoning standards; the request appears to meet all other code requirements. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Thomas and Lindsay Wernimont Owner: Thomas and Lindsay Wernimont Location: 2609 Pahl Avenue Existing Land Use Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Single Family District Surrounding Land North: Low-Density Residential / Zoned: R-1 Single Family District Use / Zoning: East: Low-Density Residential / Zoned: R-1 Single Family District South: Low-Density Residential / Zoned: R-1 Single Family District West: Low-Density Residential / Zoned: R-1 Single Family District Deadline for Agency Application Complete Date: January 28, 2019 Action: 60 Days: March 29, 2019 Letter Sent: March 11, 2019 120 Days: May 28, 2019 ANALYSIS 1. Background 22 May 14, 2019 Page 3 The applicant is proposing to construct site modifications that will encroach into the front and side setbacks, and exceed the maximum allowable impervious surface. The parcel in question is shown on the zoning map below, and is 60 feet in width and approximately 9,285 square feet in area. A. Front Setback Variance. The homes adjacent to the subject parcel result in an average setback of 35.9 feet for this parcel. The existing home on the property is currently at 32.6 feet, encroaching by 3.3 feet into the required setback. The applicants propose to construct front steps that would encroach an additional 7 feet into the required front yard. The zoning ordinance includes an allowed encroachment for stoops than may extend into a front yard by an additional five feet. Thus, the measured encroachment for the proposed front yard variance would be 5.3 feet. The zoning ordinance sets out a series of criteria for a request to qualify for variance consideration. Those criteria are found in §152.245, (C) Evidence of the Zoning Chapter, and are included in this report for reference below. The criteria can be summarized as whether there are unique conditions on the property that contribute to creation of a practical difficulty in putting the property to what would otherwise be considered a reasonable use – reasonable use is often thought of as one that would be common and acceptable in the area. Variances may not be entirely economic in nature, nor be the result of the actions of the applicant. In this case, the applicants suggest that there are conditions that meet the required criteria. First, the applicant’s home is setback 32.6 feet from the street – similar to, or slightly more than, nearly every other home constructed along the block of Pahl Avenue. Only the location of the single neighboring property to the east – a larger parcel at the corner of Pahl and Wilson Street NE – includes a 39.8 foot setback, which skews the subject property setback requirement significantly. 23 May 14, 2019 Page 4 The house on the parcel to the west is setback at 31.9 feet (0.7 feet closer than the subject parcel), and includes a front stairway encroaching to 23.0 feet from the right of way line. The applicant’s request is to construct a stairway at a setback of 25.6 feet. The applicants further suggest that the requested stoop is reasonably sized to accommodate a landing for entry into the home – a common feature – and then steps to access the landing both toward the street and to the side. A sidewalk toward the side would then extend around the house to facilitate rear yard access from this point. The proposed design does not appear to be out of character with the neighborhood. Moreover, a landing of the size proposed by the applicants would not be able to be constructed fully within the setbacks as defined by the adjoining properties. The proposed landing and steps are reasonably sized, in character with the site and the neighborhood, and appear to meet the requirements of the variance criteria as listed in the code. As noted above, staff recommends approval of the variance for the front yard encroachment for the proposed steps as shown in the applicants’ application. B. Side Yard Setback Variance. The applicants propose to add sidewalk access between the front and rear yards, extending the sidewalk from the front steps to a new landing behind an existing enclosed porch area. Walkways on private property are not required to maintain a separate setback, however, patios are required to maintain a minimum 5 foot setback from a side property line. The code does not define “sidewalk” or “walkway”. The code defines “patio” as follows: PATIO. A courtyard or other finished exterior ground surface open to the sky constructed of rock, brick, concrete, stone, or similar materials and commonly used for relaxation, socializing, or dining. The general City Code references to sidewalk and walkway apply almost exclusively to public sidewalks, but also do not define the term. In common usage, a sidewalk is a pedestrian pathway, and in residential applications, is normally between 3 and 5 feet in width. This appears to be the current condition on the subject property, and common in the nearby neighborhood. The applicants have constructed a sidewalk within the existing side yard on the east side of the house, an open area that is 11.2 feet wide between the house and the 24 May 14, 2019 Page 5 property line. The setback for the sidewalk is not delineated on the current plan, but as it nears the rear of the porch area, it is widened to approximately 10 feet, extending to within 1.2 feet of the side property line. At this point, staff would interpret the paved space to be a “patio”, under the definition in the code, even though it includes a walkway function. At 10 feet in width, it would also accommodate the recreational uses noted in the definition. As such, it is staff’s interpretation that this area must maintain a 5 foot setback from the side property line. The purposes of the setback for such uses are many. The setback accommodates a reasonable separation of activities that may impact a neighboring property. Patios allow for sustained activity, whereas a sidewalk is utilized only intermittently, making separation more important for patio areas. The setback area accommodates the possibility of screening or buffering – including fencing and/or landscaping - that can increase privacy. The setback also helps accommodate the additional drainage and runoff that would be common with a larger paved area, a condition that would not be as significant an issue with a narrower sidewalk. As developed, the applicants have numerous alternative locations for patio space to the proposed side yard encroachment. A patio space could be developed and accessible to the steps and landing being proposed adjoining the porch toward the rear of the property, rather than the side, and easily meet or exceed the five foot setback requirement. Finally, judging by aerial photography, side-yard patio encroachments do not appear to be common in the neighborhood. It is difficult to imagine that a patio with the encroachment proposed by the applicant would be necessary to make reasonable use of the property. As such, staff does not recommend approval of the variance for a side yard setback encroachment as shown on the proposed plans. The applicant should remove this aspect of the project from the proposed construction plans for the site. The applicants note that they have not applied for a variance to this setback, maintaining instead that the space is a “decorative walkway”, not subject to the patio setback requirement. Staff noticed this variance as an aspect of the project to avoid having to return to this issue at a later date. Because the concrete encroachment is already in place, and because staff’s interpretation is that this area is required to meet a 5 foot setback, the alternative would be to initiate an enforcement action to remove the encroaching pavement. A variance request would be the remedy for the property owner. Nonetheless, staff does not recommend approval, and removal would be the result of a variance denial. An alternative option would be for the applicants to appeal the staff interpretation of this pavement. An appeal is heard by the Planning Commission, sitting as the 25 May 14, 2019 Page 6 Board of Adjustments and Appeals, recommending to the City Council. As such, the process is the same as the variance process, with the standard of review similar as well. C. Impervious Surface Variance. The third variance requested is an increase in the impervious surface on the property from the maximum 35% to 37.5%. Impervious surfaces are those that are covered by material that is highly resistant to infiltration by water. The purpose of impervious surface regulations is to minimize flooding and stormwater control issues that contribute to sedimentation and pollution of local and regional water bodies. Particularly in areas that were developed prior to contemporary stormwater ponding and treatment requirements, managing impervious surfaces is a key component in avoiding these problems. The requirement for lots of more than 9,000 square feet (as with the subject parcel) is a maximum impervious coverage of 35%. For this parcel, this results in a total of 3,250 square feet of eligible impervious surface. As designed, the surveyor’s plans show an impervious total of 3,482 square feet, an excess area of 232 square feet. As discussed, the applicants made a series of changes to their plan, eventually reducing their variance request to 36.6% coverage. The applicants note that for lots below the 9,000 square foot threshold, the impervious allowance is 40%, a standard that can result in anomalous impacts – such as, an 8,900 square foot lot which would be permitted more total impervious area than the applicants’ parcel. Nonetheless, the issue is not whether the applicants are close to the standard, but whether the variance criteria are met. The applicants have an otherwise conforming parcel with no apparent unusual conditions that would separate it from other similar parcels in similar circumstances. The approval of a variance in this case would appear to be granting a unique privilege not common to similarly situated lands – at odds with the requirements for equal treatment. Finally, a further alternative for the applicants to consider would be construction of a wood deck, which is not considered to be impervious if it permits precipitation to drain through the deck to a pervious ground below. While the soils in the area do not easily accommodate infiltration, this solution is allowed by the code and is available to the applicants without increasing impervious coverage beyond the 35% standard, presuming it would meet required setbacks of 5 feet from the side property line. In summary, staff does not recommend approval of the impervious surface variance. As noted, the purposes of the ordinance would be thwarted by approval of this variance, particularly without the requisite uniqueness or practical difficulties present. 26 May 14, 2019 Page 7 2. Representative Codes Referenced. Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.039 (E) Front yard apply to this proposal. City Code Section 152.039 (E) states the front yard must have a depth equal to the greater of 30 feet or a distance equal to the average of the front yard depths of the two adjacent lots. Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.245 VARIANCES (A) Application states that “An owner of property with an existing structure which does not comply with the zoning code, or of property on which such a structure is proposed to be constructed, may apply for a variance upon payment of the fee specified in Chapter 33”. 3. Criteria for and Consistency with Criteria for Variance Approval. Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.245, (C) Evidence, lists the criteria the City Council must consider in determining whether to grant or deny a variance. Request: Request for a 7-foot variance from the required front yard setback. The applicable criteria include: 1. The subject matter of the application is within the scope of this section. 2. Strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because: a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning code; b. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner; c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. 3. The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the City’s comprehensive land use plan. 4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code. SUMMARY AND STAFF/PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Front Yard Setback Variance. Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested front yard setback encroachment variance at 2609 Pahl Avenue with the following conditions: A. The front steps are constructed to a point no closer than 25.6 feet from the front property line, as shown on the plans dated 10/31/18. B. The plans are modified to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for all other aspects, including patio setback and impervious surfaces, unless otherwise approved by the City Council. This condition would include removal of any unapproved elements of 27 May 14, 2019 Page 8 the project, including encroaching patio area adequate modifications to meet the impervious surface maximum of 35%. C. Any required permits for construction are applied for and approved by other relevant staff. This recommendation is based on a finding that the proposed steps are consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and constitute reasonable use of the property, overcoming practical difficulties related to the imposition of unusual setback requirements by adjoining homes and limitations to reasonable access to the existing structure. Side Yard Setback Encroachment Variance. Staff and Planning Commission recommend denial of the proposed side yard setback encroachment for the patio as designed and shown on the plans dated 10/31/18. This recommendation is based on a finding that the request is inconsistent with commonly found conditions in the neighborhood; that there do not appear to be any unique conditions on the property that would support varying from the ordinance 5 foot setback standard; and that there are alternatives available to the applicant that can be developed without the need for variance. Impervious Surface Coverage Variance. Staff and Planning Commission recommend denial of the variance for the proposed increase in impervious surface coverage. As noted, the maximum impervious surface standards are in place to protect the City, and neighboring property, from the potential for flooding, as well from excessive runoff of rainwater, sediment, and pollutants. No apparent special conditions are present that would justify a departure from the standard, and as noted, the applicants have alternatives that can provide recreation space without need for variance. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1. Variance to Front Yard Setback 1. Motion to approve the request for a variance to the front yard setback for construction of front landing and steps within the required 35.9 foot setback at 2609 Pahl Avenue and direct staff to prepare resolution declaring terms of the same. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the variance as requested. In the event of a recommendation for denial, the Planning Commission must state its findings related to denial. 3. Request Additional Information and Table Action, subject to the submission of additional information from staff and/or applicant. Decision 2. Variance to Side Yard Setback 28 May 14, 2019 Page 9 1. Motion to recommend approval of the request for a variance to the side yard setback for construction of a patio within the required 5 foot setback at 2609 Pahl Avenue and direct staff to prepare resolution declaring terms of the same. 2. Motion to deny the variance as requested. Denial findings are included in the proposed resolution. 3. Request Additional Information and Table Action, subject to the submission of additional information from staff and/or applicant. Decision 3. Variance to Impervious Surface Coverage 1. Motion to recommend approval of the request for a variance to the impervious surface coverage at 37.5% at 2609 Pahl Avenue and direct staff to prepare resolution declaring terms of the same. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the variance as requested. Denial findings are included in the proposed resolution. 3. Request Additional Information and Table Action, subject to the submission of additional information from staff and/or applicant. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Location map Exhibit B: Application and Supporting Material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ur Home Our home was built in 1952, 20 years before the zoning code and 41 years before a lot coverage ordinance was adopted. In the 50’s, single story homes with detached garages were customary in St. Anthony. 70 years later this continues to be the predominant home type in our neighborhood. During our remodel, we were able to maintain this neighborhood context while also preserving the façade of our home by building off the back of our house versus building up. What seemed like a logical idea at the time, is proving to be a detriment to us as our modest 15’ foot addition constitutes 15% (476 sf) of our allowed lot coverage with the total house coverage now being 45%. Lot Coverage From the timeline provided (Appendix A), a pattern of allowing more lot coverage within Saint Anthony is apparent. After adoption of the lot coverage ordinance in 1993, it was revised 2 times to increase coverage over the next 7 years, with the latest revision allowing 40% coverage to smaller lots. From our research, the ordinance was revised to accommodate lots like ours and many others in our neighborhood with single story houses and detached garages. The cutoff for 40% coverage was picked intentionally to exclude lots developed after the minimum lot size of 9000 sf became part of the zoning code (as far as we can tell). A few things of note, a 1-story home requires more lot coverage/square foot than a 2-story home of the same square footage. Detached garages also occupy more space than an attached garage, as do side-entry garages which require larger driveways than alley or street facing garages. More specifically, building code for a side entry driveway states a minimum length of 30’ with a suggested length of 35’. Our driveway is currently 32’ (reasonable) and accounts for 7.3% of our allowed lot coverage. Or 13% total when our garage is added in. While our lot is barely (3%) over the threshold (see Appendix B), it can easily be compared to the same size (60’ wide) lots on our block that are less than 9000 sf as all house widths are maxed at 45’ (15’ in setbacks). Similar lot sizes, similar house sizes, but our lot has the unique component of being longer (rear lot line not parallel) which puts it over the seemingly random 9000 sf threshold. This coverage percentage becomes more baffling for us when considering a longer lot requires more sidewalk to get from the front to the back of the lot (detached garage) but the code allows us much less (up to 10%) coverage than most of these same size lots. When researching “zoning amendment”, we found the following that is a main factor for granting relief from an ordinance: The effect that the ordinance has on your property value and the value of the nearby property. Granting most of the same width smaller lots in a neighborhood 10% more coverage than our larger lot qualifies. We can put a price to it after receiving a $129,000 improvement value on our proposed property taxes for the addition that again equated to 15% coverage increase. That would make an additional 10% of coverage worth approximately $86,000 in property value. The commission has denied our lot coverage variance as they didn’t want to set a precedent. By never allowing a “precedent”, a reverse intent is set that discourages neighborhood reinvestment which directly conflicts with the city’s comprehensive plan. No lot coverage variances mean home improvements are now at the expense of hardscapes (sidewalk, patio, etc.) or at the detriment to neighborhood character. For example, adding 15’ (2 bedrooms and 1 bathroom) onto our small 3-bedroom 2-bathroom home will no longer allow us to have reasonable sidewalk access from the front to the back of our home as we previously did. We are sure this will be missed when we attempt to navigate our 2 small children in a stroller from Pahl Ave to our garage in the alley. If said variance were granted and a precedent set, it could be deemed a “good” precedent because it is addressing an irrationality in the code. In the future, the NEW exception would only apply to lots over 9000 sf with similar circumstances (single story homes with detached garage). This thinking allows the variance to be granted with sound reasoning and limited expansion to other situations as it was granted based solely on the lot’s uniqueness and not just lot size. Even better would be the city amending the code to allow all lots over 9000 sf the greater of 3600 sf (8,999 sf x 40%) OR 35% for lot coverage so that homeowners with larger lots do not receive less coverage than smaller lots. A code amendment could also prevent homeowners with similar circumstances from going through the same measures or worse (repeal in court) than we have so far. 42 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B 43 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 CITY COUNCIL MAY 14, 2019 2609 PAHL AVENUE– Front Setback Variance for Entry Stoop Side Setback Variance for Patio Impervious Surface Coverage 3401 HARDING STREET NE FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE; SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE 51 2609 PAHL AVENUE FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE; SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE Project Description: Building Additions: Front: Pahl Ave (south); Entry Stoop Concrete Pavement Front sidewalk Rear sidewalk Site sidewalk/Patio 2609 PAHL AVENUE FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE; SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE VARIANCE CRITERIA: Use is a reasonable one, given the character of the neighborhood Unique conditions exist on the property Those conditions create practical difficulties in putting the property to that reasonable use; and Conditions cannot be created by the owner; Conditions cannot be solely economic in nature. 52 2609 PAHL AVENUE AERIAL PHOTO 2609 PAHL AVENUE INITIAL SITE PLAN AMENDED SITE PLAN 53 2609 PAHL AVENUE FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE Front Yard Setback Variance 25.6 feet Variance of 5.3 feet 2609 PAHL AVENUE SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR PATIO Side Yard Setback Variance for Patio 5 foot setback required Original installation at 1.2 foot setback (3.8 feet encroachment) Revised to meet sidewalk width (no setback), with one exception (7’ x 8’) at 3.5 feet setback 54 2609 PAHL AVENUE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE Impervious Surface Variance 35% Maximum Requirement (3,250 square feet on subject property) Original (noticed) proposal at 37.5% (3,482 square feet) Revised proposal at 36.6% (3,400 square feet) 2609 PAHL AVENUE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Front Entry Stoop (Front Setback Variance) Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested front yard setback encroachment variance at 2609 Pahl Avenue with the following conditions: A.The front addition for an entry stoop is constructed to a point no closer than 25.6 feet from the front property line, as shown on the plans dated 10/31/18. B.The plans are modified to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for all other aspects, including patio setback and impervious surfaces, unless otherwise approved by the City Council as a part of this application. This condition would include removal of any unapproved elements of the project. C.Any required permits for construction are applied for and approved by other relevant staff. 55 2609 PAHL AVENUE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 2. Patio/Sidewalk Encroachment (Side Setback Variance) Staff and Planning Commission recommends denial of the variance as requested. The staff recommendation includes a requirement that the applicant make corrections to the submitted plan, as well as the constructed improvements, to ensure that either (a) any paved area greater than 5 feet in width meets the required 5 foot setback for patios; or (b), any paved area is modified to be no more than 5 feet in width so as to constitute a sidewalk rather than a patio. 2609 PAHL AVENUE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 3. Impervious Surface Variance Planning Commission recommends denial of the variance for the proposed increase in impervious surface coverage to allow up to 3,400 square feet of impervious surface, requiring removal of adequate paved surface to meet sidewalk widths of no more than 5 feet, or patio setbacks of no less than 5 feet, and impervious surface coverage of no more than 35%. 56 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-043 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A 5.3 FOOT VARIANCE (SETBACK OF 25.6 FEET) FROM THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A FRONT STOOP; DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR A 1.6% (150 SQUARE FEET) VARIANCE FROM THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE STANDARD OF 35.0%; AND DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD OF SETBACK OF 5.0 FEET FOR PATIO AREAS. WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village received a request from Tom and Lindsay Wernimont for variances from the required front setback to allow for placement of front entry stoop, and a variance from the maximum impervious surface of 35% for residential lots to accommodate existing paved sidewalk and patio space, at 2609 Pahl Avenue, legally described as follows: Lot 33, Block 5, Murray Heights Addition to Minneapolis (Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential district and the applicable front yard setback is 30 feet for the Subject Propert y; and WHEREAS, the applicable side yard setback for patios in said district is 5 feet; and WHEREAS, the applicable impervious surface coverage requirements for lots of more than 9,000 square feet is 35.0%; and WHEREAS, Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code Section §152.245 provides that City Council must provide evidence that the subject matter of the application is within the scope of the section and that strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested variances from both front and side yard setback dimension requirements to accommodate a front entry stoop, existing paved patio, and total impervious surface of up to 36.6%; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments, submissions and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 16, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in support of the resolution: 57 Approval of Variance to Required Front Setback for Stoop: 1. The property is located in an area of varying setbacks from the street. 2. The proposed improvements to the property are consistent with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located. 3. The setbacks required by the ordinance for inhibit the reasonable access to the principal entry in question. 4. Due to the conditions found on the property, there are practical difficulties in complying with the strict terms of the ordinance. 5. The proposed variance will accommodate reasonable use without negative impacts on neighboring property nor on public improvements and services. Denial of Maximum Impervious Surface Variance: 1. The property is over the 9,000 square feet in area, limiting allowable impervious surface to no greater than 35% of the lot area. 2. The subject property is located in an area that has experienced flooding and stormwater management issues in the past. 3. The proposed improvements to the property are not consistent with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located. 4. The impervious surface areas can be reduced to meet the threshold requirement without variance, and still preserve reasonable use of the property. 5. Due to the conditions found on the property, there are no apparent practical difficulties in complying with the strict terms of the ordinance. 6. Denial of the variance would be consistent with the actions of the City Council in its efforts to manage runoff and impervious surfaces on other similarly situated property. Denial of a Variance to the Required Side Yard Setback for Patios: 1. The applicant has alternatives to location and/or construction of outdoor entertainment spaces that will not require variances. 2. The encroachment of a patio space into the required 5 foot setback interferes with the ability to screen such uses from adjoining residential property. 3. The encroachment of a patio space into the required 5 foot setback raises the potential for unanticipated drainage issues between properties. 4. There are no practical difficulties that support the retention of the previously constructed patio space in the existing location. 5. Sidewalks are allowed to encroach into the side yard, but in common residential applications are no more than 5 feet in width. 6. The applicant can reduce the width of the existing concrete areas to no more than 5 feet in width, and avoid setback encroachment concerns. NOW THEREFORE MAY IT BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village accepts the findings and recommendations documented in the staff report and by the Planning Commission and approves a variance to the required front setback requirements as shown on the plans dated 10/31/18 and modified on 4/2/19, at 2609 Pahl Avenue: a. 5.3 feet (25.6 foot setback) to the front (Pahl Avenue). 58 And further, MAY IT BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village hereby denies any variance for impervious surface coverage beyond the ordinance requirement of 35%, and also denies a variance for a patio setback of less than 5 feet, providing that any paved area within the required 5 foot setback area be modified from the existing condition to a dimension no greater than 5 feet in width so as to constitute a residential walkway; or that any paved area greater that 5 feet in width be modified from the existing condition to meet the required 5 foot setback for patio areas, and that plans documenting compliance are prepared and delivered to the City reflecting compliance with this Resolution. Passed in regular session of the City Council on the 14th day of May, 2019. CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE By:_________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: By:_________________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk 59 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 60 S:\1Council Meetings\2019\05142019\Memorandum_Resolution_AuthorizeEAW-042619.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Mark Casey, City of St. Anthony Village Honorable Mayor Faust and Members of the City Council From: Todd Hubmer PE, WSB – City Engineer Date: April 26, 2019 Re: Silver Lake Village Multifamily Redevelopment Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) WSB Project No. R-013966-000 On April 18, 2019, Doran Development submitted a letter to the City of St. Anthony Village (City) requesting the completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Silver Lake Village Multifamily Redevelopment project. In response to this request, we have prepared for the Council’s consideration, the attached resolution authorizing the preparation of an EAW for the development of nearly 500 residential units at Silver Lake Village If you have any questions, please call me at 763-287-7182. 61 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 62 7803 Glenroy Road, Suite 200 | Bloomington, MN 55439 | 952.288.2000 | Fax: 952.288.2001 | www.DoranCompanies.com April 18, 2019 Silver Lake Village Multifamily Redevelopment Honorable Mayor Faust and Members of City Council, Bloomington, MN—based Doran Companies (“Doran”) is proposing a phased multifamily redevelopment (the “Project”) of the vacant Wal-Mart parcel located at 3800 Silver Lake Road (“Project Site”) in the Silver Lake Village shopping center in the City of St. Anthony, MN. Anticipated to bring approximately 500 units over two phases, the project aims to increase density and provide much-needed housing options to St. Anthony and surrounding residents. As part of the City’s review and approval process of the project, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (“EAW”) is required. Doran has worked with City Staff to identify WSB as the preferred provider for this scope of work and we understand the costs of this work will be borne by Doran. It is our understanding that the City requires a formal request for an EAW to be authorized. Please consider this letter our formal request that the Council authorize this EAW to be performed and completed. We look forward to working with you to create this exciting new community in the City of St. Anthony. Sincerely, Evan Doran Senior Director of Development Doran Companies 63 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 64 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 19-044 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) FOR THE PROPOSED SILVER LAKE VILLAGE MULTIFAMILY REDEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village is the Responsible Government Unit (RGU), for completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410; and WHEREAS, Doran Development is proposing a multifamily residential redevelopment project, which requires mandatory preparation of an EAW in accordance with MN Rules 4410.4300 – Subpart 19 A (Residential Development), as the proposed project exceeds the threshold of 375 attached units in a city within the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area that has adopted a comprehensive plan. The project proposed approximately 500 attached units; and WHEREAS, Doran Development has provided the City a letter, dated April 18, 2019 requesting authorization by the City Council, for completion of the EAW. WHEREAS, Doran Development understands the cost of the preparation of the EAW will be borne by Doran Development; and WHEREAS, the findings and conclusions of the EAW process will be presented to the City Council at a future City Council meeting as to whether the project has potential for significant environmental impacts that would trigger the need for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of St. Anthony Village, MN: The City authorizes the City Engineer to prepare the mandatory EAW for the proposed Silver Lake Village Multifamily Redevelopment in accordance with MN Rules. Adopted this 14th day of May, 2019. _________________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Review for Administration: _________________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager 65 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 66 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Ordinance-Amendment to Chapter 112 Alcoholic Beverages OVERVIEW: In front of you this evening are proposed amendments to Chapter 112 Alcoholic Beverages, section 112.09 Places Ineligible for a License. This is the first of three readings. National Grill is providing food and beverage service at the clubhouse for Gross Golf Course. They currently have a 3.2 On-sale malt liquor license, which is permitted per our City Code. National Grill is requesting an amendment to the City Code to allow Golf Courses located in the Recreation/Open Space District to be eligible for a Wine license or a full On-sale intoxicating liquor license. Currently our City Code permits Wine and On-sale intoxicating liquor license only to restaurants located in the Commercial District. Gross Golf Course is the only Golf Course located in the Recreation/Open Space district in St. Anthony. All other license requirements for liquor licensing will remain the same as outlined in the City Code. 67 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 68 69 70 71 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 72 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-02 SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 112.09 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, PLACES INELIGIBLE FOR A LICENSE The City Council of the City of Saint Anthony Village ordains as follows: Section One. Amendment to the City of Saint Anthony Village City Code to Amend Section §112.09 Alcoholic Beverages, Places ineligible for a license in the City Code of the City of Saint Anthony Village is hereby amended as follows. The deleted language is represented by strikethrough text. The additional language is represented by single underlined text. § 112.09 PLACES INELIGIBLE FOR A LICENSE. (A) General restrictions. No off-sale or on-sale license shall be granted or renewed for: (1) Any property on which taxes, assessments, or other financial claims of the state, county or city are due, delinquent, or unpaid; (2) Any property on which the business is to be conducted is owned by a person who is ineligible for a license pursuant to § 112.08; (3) Any property located within 300 feet of a place of worship or an elementary, junior high or senior high school having a regular course of study accredited by the state. A location which holds a license under this subchapter shall not be declared ineligible for license renewal or transfer due to a place of worship or school that was newly located in its proximity after license issuance. The provisions of this division (A)(3) shall not apply to temporary on-sale 3.2% malt liquor licenses or temporary wine licenses; (4) Any property where a license issued under this subchapter has been revoked during the preceding year unless the issuance of the license is unanimously approved by the City Council then present; (5) Any property where the conduct of the business is prohibited by Chapter 152; (6) Any property not eligible under M.S. § 340A, as it may be amended from time to time, and the regulations of the Department of Public Safety; and/or (7) Any property used as a sexually-oriented business as defined by Chapter 110. (B) Off-sale 3.2% malt liquor licenses. In addition to the requirements of division (A) above, no off-sale 3.2% malt liquor license shall be granted to any theater, recreation establishment, public dancing place, or establishment holding any on-sale license. (C) On-sale 3.2% malt liquor licenses. In addition to the requirements of division (A) above, no on-sale 3.2% malt liquor license shall be granted for establishments other than restaurants, golf courses, bowling centers, and hotels. The provisions of this division (C) do not apply to temporary on-sale 3.2% malt liquor licenses. 73 (D)Wine licenses. In addition to the requirements of division (A) above, no wine license shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant located in the Commercial District or golf courses located in the Recreation/Open Space R/O District. (E)On-sale intoxicating liquor licenses. In addition to the requirements of division (A) above, no on-sale intoxicating liquor license shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the Commercial District or golf courses located in the Recreation/Open Space R/O District. (1993 Code, § 1000.09) , Section Two. Effective Date. This Ordinance amendment shall be in full force and effect upon its publication as provided by law. Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective as of its publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Adopted: CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE By:_________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST: By:_________________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin Publication Date: 74 Website (2/14 launch) Feb 14 - Feb 28 March Apr 1-25 Total Visitors 1,369 1,563 1,414 St. Anthony/CTV Landing (Page Views) 46 76 109 St. Anthony – Meeting 92 74 105 St. Anthony – City Council 65 108 68 PROGRAMMING • PRODUCTION SERVICES: ü “Service For A Better World” {4/30} featuring local service organizations LIVE @ CTV Studio stalking about their mission. Including NYFS ü “Tuesday with a Scholar” Ramsey County Library: 4/2, 4/9. 4/16, 4/23 Ø Includes former Senator Dave Durenburger and columnist Ed Lotterman • NEW PROGRAMS on CTV CHANNELS (102 Total) = 120.5 hours of programming • CITY MEETINGS (43 Total): 4 – St. Anthony city meetings – web streams • NORTH SUBURBAN COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Meeting [Live] – April 4 • RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD MEETINGS: Every Tuesday, [Live Ch19 – 9am] • SA 282 SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS: 4/2 [Live Ch. 20 & web] • RICE CREEK WATERSHED Meetings: : 4/10 April 2019 Programming, Website & Social Media Social Media February March Apr 1 - 25 CTV Facebook posts 79 85 86 CTV Facebook Total Likes 824 838 844 75 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 76 Date Type Staff Present May 20 Special 4:30 p.m.Tour of the City City Council City Manager May 28 Regular Salo Park Concert Series Order 2021 Street & Utility Recon Feasibility Study 35W Gateway Project 2019 Street Projects-Public Hearing & 2019 Street Projects-Call for Sale of Bonds Code Text Amendment Alcoholic Beverages 2nd reading Chamber of the Year and Business of the Year Finance Department Annual Report CCC Resolution City Council City Manager City Engineer Finance Director June 3 Special 5:30 p.m.Worksession City Council City Manager June 11 Regular Planning Commission Items from May GreenCorp Update Code Text Amendment Alcoholic Beverages final reading and adoption Hennepin County Commissioner Irene Fernando City Council City Manager June 25 Regular Audit Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director July 9 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Beverage Award Recognition 2019 Street Projects Approve Sale of Bonds City Council City Manager July 23 Regular Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Liquor Operations Mid Year Report VillageFest Presentation Quarterly Goals Update EAW Results City Council City Manager Police Chief Liquor Op Mgr August 13 Regular Planning Commission items from July SANB #282 Presentation City Council City Manager August 27 Regular Budget Presentation GreenCorp Update City Council City Manager Finance Director September 10 Regular Planning Commission items from August 2020 Preliminary Operating Budget and Levy-Public Hearing Kiwanis Peanut Day Approve 2020 Street & Utility Recon Feasibility Study & order 2020 Plans and Specs City Council City Manager Finance Director City Engineer FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS 2019 77 Date Type Staff Present FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS September 24 Regular Fire Prevention Presentation City Council City Manager Fire Dept October 8 Regular Planning Commission items from September Quarterly Donations & Grants Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Waste Hauler Accounts-Consent Agenda Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Utility Accounts-Consent Agenda Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager October 22 Regular Approval of CIP City Council City Manager Finance Director November 12 Regular Planning Commission items from October 1st Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater-Public Hearing City Council City Manager November 26 Regular Fire Prevention Poster Winners Water Conservation Poster Winners 2nd Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater Authorizing polling places for 2020 City Council City Manager Fire Dept Public Works Director December 10 Regular Planning Commission items from November Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs Setting Salary of City Manager Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds Setting the 2020 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy -Public Hearing Final Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater 2020 Fee Schedule 2020 Street Project Approve Plans & Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids Approval of 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan (motion only) City Council City Manager Finance Director City Engineer December 23 Regular City Council City Manager January 14 Regular Planning Commission items from December Housekeeping Resolutions Resolution for the Street Improvement Bond Reimbursement Quarterly Donations & Grants City Council City Manager January ?Special 9:00 a.m.Goal Setting City Council City Manager Dept Heads January ?Special 9:00 a.m.Goal Setting City Council City Manager Dept Heads January 28 Regular 2020 Parks Commission Work Plan- (motion only) NYFS Agreement City Council City Manager 2020 78 Date Type Staff Present FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS February 11 Regular Planning Commission items from January 2020 Street Project Call for Hearing on Improvements, Call for Hearing on Assessments, Order Preparation of Assessments City Council City Manager City Engineer February 25 Regular Administration Annual Report Adoption of Strategic Plan City Council City Manager March 10 Regular Planning Commission Items from February Liquor Annual Report Fire Annual Report Liquor License Renewals GreenCorp Member application-resolution City Council City Manager Fire Dept Liquor Op Manager March 24 Regular Police Annual Report Wyland Water Challenge Public Hearing-Budget Calendar 2020 Street Project Public Hearing, Order Improvements, Adopt & Confirm Assessments, Award Contract for Construction, Call for Sale of GO Bonds City Council City Manager Police Dept Finance Director April 14 Regular Planning Commission Items from March Quarterly Donations & Grants Public Works Annual Report Spirit of St. Anthony Award Award Contracts for construction, Call for Sale of GO Bonds City Council City Manager Public Works Director City Engineer April 28 Regular Arbor Day Proclamation 1st Quarter Goals Update City Council City Manager May 12 Regular Planning Commission items from April Finance Annual Report Insurance Renewal Tort Limits - Consent City Council City Manager Finance Director 79