The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPL PACKET 08202019 If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313 or email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is sustainable, safe and secure. Call to Order. Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on all of the following items: I. Approval of the August 20, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda. (action requested) II. Approval of the April 16, 2019 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. (action requested) III. Public Hearing. A. Consider a request for an amendment to the Silver Lake Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) at 3800 Silver Lake Road NE. This public hearing will be to consider the application of Doran SLV, LLC for a Preliminary Plan stage of the Silver Lake Village PUD. IV. Staff Reports. V. Other Business. VI. Community Forum. Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any City business item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk’s record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the Planning Commission will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. VII. Information and Announcements. VIII. Adjournment. CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 20, 2019 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 PM CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 2 April 16, 2019 3 7:00 p.m. 4 5 CALL TO ORDER. 6 7 Vice Chair Westrick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 8 9 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 10 11 Vice Chair Westrick invited the Commission and the audience to join her in the Pledge of Allegiance. 12 13 ROLL CALL. 14 15 Commissioners Present: Vice Chair Westrick, Commissioners Neumann, Payne, Rude, and 16 Socha. 17 18 Absent: Chair Papatola, and Commissioner Bartel 19 20 Also Present: Student Liaison Nimo Hashi and City Planner Stephen Grittman 21 22 23 I. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 16, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 24 AGENDA. 25 26 Motion by Commissioner Payne, seconded by Commissioner Neumann, to approve the April 16, 27 2019 Planning Commission agenda. 28 29 Motion carried 5-0. 30 31 II. APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 19, 2019 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION 32 MEETING MINUTES. 33 34 Motion by Commissioner Neumann, seconded by Commissioner Rude, to approve the March 19, 35 2019 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes as presented. 36 37 Motion carried 5-0. 38 39 III. PUBLIC HEARING. 40 41 A. Consider a request for a 10.3 foot variance from the required 35.9 foot front yard 42 setback to allow for new front steps, consider a request for a 3.8 foot variance from 43 the required 5 foot side yard setback to allow for a patio, and consider a request for 44 a 1.6% variance from the maximum impervious lot coverage amount of 36.7% at 45 2609 Pahl Avenue. 46 47 Vice Chair Westrick opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. 48 49 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 16, 2019 Page 2 City Planner Stephen Grittman reviewed the applicant has constructed an addition to the rear of 1 an existing home at 2609 Pahl Avenue. The applicants are Lindsay and Tom Wernimont. The 2 addition to the one-story rambler included a large window well area to provide light to the lower 3 level. As a part of the project, the applicant constructed walkways and a side yard patio that were 4 not included on the original plans. Additional work includes front and rear raised landings, one 5 of which is the construction of a front stoop that encroaches into the front yard setback. In 6 reviewing the work, the project both as now constructed and as proposed raised three potential 7 elements that would have required variances, as follows: 8 9 A. Raised front steps that encroach farther into the required 35.9-foot yard setback (the existing 10 structure is currently closer than the average setback of the adjoining parcels). The proposed 11 setback would be 25.6 feet. 12 B. Sidewalk access between front and rear yards which expands to a patio that encroaches by 13 3.8 feet into the required 5-foot side yard setback, to a proposed setback of 1.2 feet (this 14 portion was constructed but not approved previously). 15 C. Steps, walkway and patio which combine to increase impervious surface on the lot by 2.5% 16 beyond the required 35% maximum coverage (a proposed maximum impervious of 36.7%). 17 18 Since the time of the original public hearing notice, the applicants have worked with staff to 19 refine their application, making changes to increase conformity with several aspects of the 20 zoning ordinance. Those changes resulted in narrowing of much of the paved space in the side 21 yard to less than 5 feet in width, and a resulting reduction to overall impervious surface to 22 36.7%. 23 24 Mr. Grittman reviewed the variance criteria and justification for the requested variance. 25 26 • Use is a reasonable one, given the character of the neighborhood 27 • Unique conditions exist on the property 28 • Those conditions create practical difficulties in putting the property to that reasonable use 29 • Conditions cannot be created by the owner 30 • Conditions cannot be solely economic in nature. 31 32 The site plan was amended to remove some existing pavement and expands the deck. A deck 33 does not constitute an impervious surface. For the front yard setback variance, the applicant is 34 asking for a variance of 5.3 feet. Staff is supportive of this request. For the side setback variance 35 for patio, some modifications have been made to the site plan. Original installation was at 1.2-36 foot setback (3.8 feet encroachment). This has been revised to meet sidewalk width (no setback) 37 with one exception (7-feet x 8-feet) at 3.5 feet setback. The applicants did not originally apply 38 for this variance. Staff does not recommend the variance as there is adequate area that could 39 meet the setback requirement with further modifications. The applicants have revised their plans 40 to get closer to the setback requirement. 41 42 Mr. Grittman reviewed the impervious surface variance – 35% maximum requirement (3,250 43 square feet on subject property. The original proposal was at 37.5% (3,482 sf). Revised proposal 44 is 36.7% (3,410 sf). Staff recommends including elimination of some “patio” pavement 36.6% 45 (3,400 sf) of the modified plan. The applicant would still exceed the impervious amount. 46 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 16, 2019 Page 3 1 Mr. Grittman noted a variance concern was received from David and Traci Wischmeier, 2617 2 Pahl Avenue. They are requesting that the lot coverage variance and the encroachment/setback 3 variance be denied. A variance concern addendum was also submitted addressing the applicants’ 4 new zoning request presentation. Because a portion of the side yard paved space continues (in 5 the current proposal) to be shown at more than 5 feet in width and closer than 5 feet to the side 6 property line, a variance is still at issue for this dimension, although lesser in scope than 7 originally required. As a result, variances from each of these three standards are required to 8 proceed with the project as planned. 9 10 Mr. Grittman noted in reviewing the proposed improvements against the ordinance requirements, 11 staff recommends approval of the front yard setback encroachment as proposed, denial of the 12 side yard setback variance for the “patio”, and approval of the impervious surface coverage 13 variance as modified to consist of a sidewalk no more than 5 feet wide. Staff has reviewed for 14 height, yard setbacks, and other zoning standards; the request appears to meet all other code 15 requirements. 16 17 Mr. Tom and Mrs. Lindsay Wernimont, 2609 Pahl Avenue, appeared before the Commission. 18 Mrs. Wernimont distributed their revised proposal to the Commission. They appreciate the time 19 City Staff has taken to address their project. The original basis is for what the builder submitted. 20 The builder is removing the concrete because it was their error. There are two entrances. The 21 plan for the front yard variance will be more warm and appealing. They are requesting the 36.7% 22 impervious to allow for the sidewalk. They have made an adjustment at the end of the landing 23 and showed a picture of the revision. They have been trying to get as close to the code as they 24 can. 25 26 Mrs. Traci and Mr. David Wischmeier, 2617 Pahl Avenue, are the neighbors east of the property 27 in question. They think the addition looks great and it is an improvement to the neighborhood. 28 They are not concerned about the variance for the front yard setback. They do have issues about 29 the side encroachment and amount of impervious lot coverage. They have been concerned about 30 the site plan throughout the entire process. The patio has been poured within 1.2 feet from the 31 shared property line in violation of the code which requires a 5-foot setback. They appreciate all 32 the attempts the homeowners have engaged in their plans to make the side setback compliant. 33 They do not feel 5 feet is customary in their neighborhood. These lots are close together. Ms. 34 Wischmeier provided an arial shot of the neighborhood. The current sidewalks on other 35 properties is 3-4 feet wide. The walkways to the back of the lot are 2-3 feet wide. They feel a 5-36 foot walkway will change the character of the neighborhood. They are also concerned about the 37 noise that will be generated from their entertainment space. They are concerned about privacy 38 issues with a walkway between homes. This could also be a safety issue. The code was quoted 39 that a 5-foot setback be adhered to and the walkway should be limited to 3 feet wide would go 40 along with the character of the neighborhood. They have had water in their basement every year 41 except last year. They are also concerned about the impervious amount. They hope a solution can 42 be found that both parties can support. 43 44 Vice Chair Westrick closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. 45 46 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 16, 2019 Page 4 Commissioner Neumann stated she has a few statements and then will leave the meeting. She 1 stated this is similar to a previous discussion about what is considered a deck. She stated the 2 presentations were of a strong caliber, and the residents should consider being part of the 3 Planning Commission. Commissioner Neumann recommended adding a worksession to propose 4 establishing parameters moving forward. She is concerned the 35% impervious amount is not 5 being met. The conditions created by the owner will affect the neighbors. 6 7 Commissioner Neumann left the meeting at 7:44 p.m. 8 9 Commissioner Socha asked if an exception should be made with the 5 feet because it is being 10 considered a sidewalk rather than a patio. Mrs. Wernimont stated they plan to construct a fence 11 in the spring for their own privacy. The kick outs on the sidewalk are decorative. 12 13 Commissioner Payne clarified that the existing concrete will be removed and the sidewalk will 14 be 4.9 feet. He asked how necessary the kick outs are. 15 16 Commissioner Rude stated if a sidewalk is considered to be 5 feet or less. Mr. Grittman stated 17 there is not a setback or definition relating to private sidewalks. Commissioner Rude referred to 18 the photograph and asked if there is 10 feet between the houses. Mr. Grittman stated the 19 minimum setback is five feet. 20 21 Commissioner Socha stated she understands why they want a recreational space and asked if 22 they considered wood rather than concrete. Mrs. Wernimont stated it is a modest space for a 23 table and chairs. 24 25 Vice Chair Westrick asked if the applicant considered pervious pavers or concrete that is 26 available. Mr. Grittman stated the City does not offer discount for pervious pavers. 27 28 Commissioner Socha commented there are no issues with the front yard setback. She feels the 29 definition of the sidewalk is clear. She does not feel the benefit of the sidewalk being closer than 30 5 feet is not reasonable. 31 32 Commissioner Rude stated a substantial amount of money has been spent dealing with drainage 33 in that neighborhood. To have concrete for decorative purposes is not needed. If the variance is 34 granted for the front setback would it just include the steps or could it be covered. Mr. Grittman 35 stated it would only be the steps. 36 37 Mrs. Wernimont asked if they made concessions to remove jet outs on the sides would that assist 38 in a decision being made. They are trying to make this work for everyone. Vice Chair Westrick 39 stated the Commission should continue with what is proposed. 40 41 Commissioner Socha asked if the removal of the jet outs would bring it down 14 sf. Mr. 42 Grittman stated based on the numbers, they have it appears it would be 165 sf over the 35% 43 threshold. 44 45 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 16, 2019 Page 5 Vice Chair Westrick asked if this would be setting a precedent with all the issues with water 1 drainage. Mrs. Wernimont stated they have a sump pump which has never turned on. 2 3 Motion by Commissioner Socha, seconded by Commissioner Payne, to approve the request for a 4 5.3-foot variance for the front yard setback at 2609 Pahl Avenue. 5 6 Motion carried 4-0. 7 8 Motion by Commissioner Socha, seconded by Commissioner Rude, to deny a request for an 9 exemption for a 1.6% variance for the impervious coverage at 2609 Pahl Avenue. 10 11 Motion carried 4-0. 12 13 Commissioner Socha stated a work session was held previously on another deck and that was 14 denied. She does not support any paved surface encroaching within 5 feet of the setback. 15 16 Motion by Commissioner Socha, to deny any paved area request that would fall within the 5-foot 17 side yard setback. 18 19 Commissioner Rude stated he feels a 3-foot sidewalk should be allowed but the motion was 20 worded such that nothing within the 5-foot setback would be allowed. 21 22 Motion failed for lack of a second. 23 24 Commissioner Socha asked if Staff had a recommendation for language for a motion. She 25 recommended the following motion. 26 27 Motion by Commissioner Westrick, to approve a 1.1-foot variance from the side yard setback, 28 with the removal of the jet outs at 2609 Pahl Avenue. 29 30 Motion failed for lack of a second. 31 32 Commissioner Socha stated she would be in favor of a 3-foot wide sidewalk. 33 34 Commissioner Socha stated a work session was held previously on another deck and that was 35 denied. 36 37 Motion by Commissioner Rude, seconded by Commissioner Socha, to deny the variance request 38 for the side yard setback citing staff’s findings on the matter. 39 40 Motion carried 4-0. 41 42 IV. STAFF REPORTS. 43 44 Mr. Grittman introduced his associate Mr. Ryan Saltis who has assisted on some of the St. 45 Anthony matters. 46 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 16, 2019 Page 6 1 V. OTHER BUSINESS – NONE. 2 3 VI. COMMUNITY FORUM. 4 5 No one appeared to address the Commission. 6 7 VII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS – NONE. 8 9 VIII. ADJOURNMENT. 10 11 Motion by Commissioner Payne, seconded by Commissioner Socha, to adjourn the meeting at 12 8:20 p.m. 13 14 Motion carried 4-0. 15 16 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 Debbie Wolfe (TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.) 19 MEMORANDUM To: St. Anthony Village Planning Commission From: Stephen Grittman, City Planner Date: Planning Commission Meeting – August 20, 2019 NAC Project No. 323.01 – 19.12 Request: Request for a Preliminary Plan Amendment to the Silver Lake Village Planned Unit Development Property Address: 3800 Silver Lake Road NE Property PID: 313023340028; 313023340030 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the project for land use compliance with the intent and policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and for zoning consistency with the R-4, Multiple Family Residential District as a baseline. In summary, the Comprehensive Plan promotes redevelopment of the Walmart site as a major goal, and includes high density multiple family residential uses of up to 40 units per acre as allowable in this area. The applicant is seeking the PUD Amendment at just over 35 units per acre. The proposed PUD meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the majority of the baseline standards. The principal areas of flexibility under the PUD include: (1) The proposal to have two principal buildings on a single development parcel. (2) Building height (code is 35 feet/3 stories); applicant proposes approximately 52 feet and 4 stories (5 including the exposed portion of the lower-level parking garage). (3) Parking supply (code requires 2 per unit, total of 928); applicant proposes 813 spaces – 1.75 per unit or 1.35 per bedroom. (4) Lot coverage/impervious surface (R-4 code limits this to 50%); applicant’s proposal is approximately 75%. (5) Density (R-4 code limits this to approximately 24 units per acre, Comprehensive Plan calls for 20-40 units per acre); applicant is proposing approximately 35 units per acre. August 20, 2019 Page 2 Staff believes that the flexibility requested under the PUD is appropriate, given the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the related improvements and amenities proposed as part of the project. Staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary Plan stage of the PUD Amendment for Silver Lake Village, with a series of conditions as noted in the summary section below. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Doran SLV, LLC Owner: IRC Silver Lake Village, et al Location: 3800 Silver Lake Road Existing Land Use Vacant Retail Building and Parking Lot Zoning: PUD, Silver Lake Village PUD Surrounding Land North: Retail Commercial zoned Silver Lake Village PUD Use / Zoning: East: Retail Pad Sites – Coffee Shop/Gas Station zoned PUD South: Railroad, then Commercial/Industrial zoned L-I, Light Industrial West: Multiple Family Residential zoned PUD Deadline for Agency Application Complete Date: July 29, 2019 Action: 60 Days: September 27, 2019 Letter Sent: NA 120 Days: November 26, 2019 ANALYSIS 1. Background The applicant is proposing to redevelop the existing Walmart site, including demolition of the building and parking lot, replacing the current structure with a two-phase multiple family residential project of approximately 464 dwelling units. The development parcels in question are shown on the zoning map below, and are 13 acres in total area. The project is proposed to be developed in two phases. The Phase 1 apartment building is to be located on the northern one-half of the site and includes 230 units. The Phase 2 building is to be located on the southern one-half of the site and includes 234 units. Each building measures five stories in height with the ground level floor being devoted to indoor parking. The apartment project includes several amenities including a 9,300 square foot clubhouse building within which a fitness center, game room, business center and entertainment suites are to be provided. Also included amenities are an outdoor pool, two spas, community grills and outdoor gathering spaces. August 20, 2019 Page 3 The Phase 1 apartment building and clubhouse are expected to be completed by the summer of 2021 while the Phase 2 building is expected to be completed by the summer of 2023. Within the apartment buildings, a range of unit types are to be provided including studio/alcove units, one-bedroom units, two-bedroom units and three-bedroom units. The subject site is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. Within PUD zoning districts, uses and development parameters/requirements are specified in a PUD development agreement. Modification of the original terms of the PUD approval are subject to PUD amendment processing and specifically the consideration of new Preliminary and Final PUD plans. 2. Analysis Planned Unit Development Purpose. The applicant wishes to amend the previously approved PUD, Planned Unit Development (presently applicable to the site) accommodate the proposed apartment building project. In consideration of PUD applications, it is important that the purpose of August 20, 2019 Page 4 planned unit development be considered and that a determination be made that such purpose will be fulfilled. Generally speaking, planned unit development is intended to allow a mixture of uses and/or flexibility from the strict terms of the Zoning Ordinance in return for higher site and building design standards than what would otherwise be allowed. Section 152.202 of the Zoning Ordinance specifically states that planned unit development may allow the following: (A) Variety. Within a comprehensive site design concept, a mixture of land uses, housing types and densities; (B) Sensitivity. Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks, yard areas, lot sizes, minimum house sizes, minimum requirements, and other performance standards associated with traditional zoning, a PUD can maximize the development potential of land while remaining sensitive to its unique and valuable natural characteristics; (C) Efficiency. The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths and other utility-related expenses; (D) Density transfer. The project density may be clustered, basing density on a number of units per acre in place of specific lot dimensions; and (E) District integration. The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: 1. Mixed residential uses to allow both densities and unit types to be varied within the project; 2. Mixed residential uses with increased density based upon the greater sensitivity of PUD projects to regulation; and 3. Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. Existing PUD. Approved in 2004, the existing PUD overlays more than 60 acres of land. In this regard, the 13-acre Walmart site is a component of a larger PUD site which includes several surrounding commercial and multi-family residential buildings. The project amendment under consideration only encompasses the 13-acre Walmart site. In this regard, all other existing PUD sites/uses are to remain in place and no modifications are proposed. Processing. To accommodate the requested PUD amendment, a two-stage review process will take place. Basically, the requested amendment will be treated (from a process standpoint) like a new PUD application. In this regard, the application under consideration is the Preliminary PUD Plan stage. Generally speaking, Preliminary Plan approval is similar to a basic rezoning in that it establishes that the proposed use is appropriate for the subject site. Also, as part of Preliminary Plan review, various conditions of approval are typically imposed. The Preliminary Plan will be subject to a public hearing, review and recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. August 20, 2019 Page 5 The second stage is the Final PUD Plan which basically serves to implement the various conditions of Preliminary Plan approval and ensure that such conditions have been satisfied. The Final Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Council. No public hearing is required for Final Plan. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). In May of 2019, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed for the redevelopment project under consideration by the City. The purpose of the EAW process is to disclose information about potential environmental impacts of a project. Information disclosed in the EAW process is intended to determine whether a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed and to indicate how the project can be modified to lessen its environmental impacts. In this regard, the EAW review considers the potential environmental impacts associated with the apartment building project, including issues associated with the demolition of the existing Walmart facilities. After receiving comments, the City Council adopted a resolution (Resolution 19-058) of “negative declaration” regarding the potential for significant environmental impacts. This action includes a series of mitigation steps that will be factored into project approval, and finds that no EIS is necessary. Comprehensive Plan. The City’s draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan is presently under review by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has classified St. Anthony Village as an “urban community.” “Urban communities” are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth at average densities of at least 10 units per acre for new development and redevelopment. In addition, “urban communities” are expected to target opportunities for intensive development near regional transit investments. The City’s draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the former Walmart site as a priority redevelopment opportunity. Recognizing that the City is expected to accommodate an increase in population and that little to no vacant land presently exists, redevelopment of previously developed sites is considered the primary means of achieving the City’s residential density objectives. The Land Use Plan included in the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan directs commercial use of the subject site. The Plan also notes however, that high density residential redevelopment (within Area 7) is specifically encouraged and allowed on the subject site. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also establishes a desired density range of 20 to 40 units per acre for high density residential development. The applicant has proposed a residential density of 35.7 units per acre (464 dwelling units/13 acres) which is within the density range directed by the draft 2040 Plan. With the preceding in mind, the proposed redevelopment project is considered consistent with the City’s 2040Comprehensive Plan. August 20, 2019 Page 6 The housing aspect of the project potentially raises the issue of affordability. The City’s Comprehensive Plan identifies several aspects of affordability and density. The Plan notes that for existing housing stock, St. Anthony Village provides a greater ratio of affordable housing, a greater ratio of rental housing, and a greater ratio of multiple family housing that the metropolitan area in general. This is also true for most aspects of affordability when compared to nearby suburban communities. With regard to planned housing and affordability, the Metropolitan Council assigned (as a part of the 2040 Plan Update process) an allocation for 152 additional “affordable” units to St. Anthony for the 2021-2030 decade. The Plan accommodates this allocation with land designated for affordable residential development of more than 460 units. The proposed Silver Lake Village PUD Amendment presently before the City is also defined as affordable in Met Council’s calculations, based on its density – doubling the proposed potential supply. Planning staff would note that while rent ranges for the proposed project are not considered in this calculation, not every project will meet every goal of the Comprehensive Plan. The primary goals met by this project would include compatible redevelopment of the Walmart site – an important Village planning objective which stands on its own. Land Use Compatibility. In consideration of the proposed apartment building project, a determination should be made that the proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses. Land uses which surround the subject site include the Silver Lake Village commercial shopping to the north (along 39th Avenue NE), a convenience gas station and coffee store to the east, a Soo Line rail to the south and multi-family residential housing to the west. A City park (Salo Park) also lies to the west of the project site. Recognizing that multi-family residential uses and a park border the subject site on the west, the proposed multi-family housing project will be contiguous to similar uses and therefore is considered generally compatible with surrounding uses (and not an isolated use). Site Access. Primary access to the subject site is to be provided from the east via Silver Lake Road. In this regard, the access previously utilized by Walmart is to be retained. Access to a surface parking lot in the northwest corner of the site is to be provided indirectly from 39th Avenue NE through an abutting commercial property. As a condition of Final PUD approval, an assurance should be made that an access easement is in place to accommodate the northly access to the subject site. Proof of such access easement should be provided to the City. Access-related issues should be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Site and Building Layout. The site and building layout are considered well-conceived and respectful of the site’s context. August 20, 2019 Page 7 The two proposed apartment buildings are situated in a manner which creates an internal court area which is provided a connection (visual and physical via a trail link) to the existing park and multi-family residential uses to the west. In this regard, the proposed apartment buildings serve to buffer the interior court (amenity) area from higher intensity commercial uses which exist to the north and east of the site and the rail line located to the south. As is also noted in the landscaping section below, planning staff would encourage attention to the east-facing portion of the project to create a more prominent “front door” impression to the most public side of the project. The interior courtyard is an excellent amenity to the residents and visitors to the development. However, the primary view and experience of this portion of the Silver Lake Village PUD is undifferentiated from any other part of the building. Enhancing the view of the development toward the public side would better meet the expectations of the Silver Lake Village development overall, as well as the expectations for Planned Unit Development design specifically. Setbacks. The PUD zoning district does not impose specific structure setback requirements. For reference purposes however, the following table illustrates setback requirements imposed in the City’s R-4 Multiple Family Residential zoning district (commonly applied to high density residential housing projects) and setbacks proposed by the applicant: As a part of the Silver Lake Village PUD, the plat provides access from Silver Lake Road via an extension of the subject development parcel that is 60 feet in width. This portion of the “Walmart” parcel also accommodates a driveway that is shared with the outlot pads fronting Silver Lake Road (one of which is currently undeveloped, and the other which is occupied by the Starbucks coffee shop). For purposes of “setback” chart below, planning staff is using the lot line shared with the outlot pad sites as the front lot line. R-4 District Setback Proposed Setback Front Yard 30 feet 45 feet Side Yard 15 feet 15 feet (north) 50 feet (south) Rear Yard 40 feet or 20 % of the lot depth, whichever is greater 45 feet Building Separation 30 feet 90 feet As shown above, the proposed structure setbacks meet or exceed the requirements imposed in the City’s R-4 District. Recognizing that the site is bordered on the north and east by commercial uses and on the south by a rail line, shadows cast on adjacent properties (from the five story buildings) are not expected to have negative impacts. For these reasons, it is the opinion of staff that the proposed structure setbacks are acceptable. August 20, 2019 Page 8 Off-Street Parking Supply. According to the Zoning Ordinance, apartments must provide two off-street spaces per unit, one of which is enclosed. In this regard, a total of 928 off-street parking stalls must be provided on the site, of which 464 must be enclosed. The following is a summary of the off-street parking supply which proposed upon the subject site: Surface Stalls Garage Stalls Total Phase 1 129 233 362 Phase 2 211 240 451 340 473 813 Of the total 813 off-street parking stalls, 473 are to be enclosed. As a condition of Final PUD approval, a plan of the enclosed parking area should be submitted for City review. As indicated in the table, a total of 813 off-street parking stalls are proposed on the site which is 115 stalls less than that required by the Ordinance. In consideration of this parking supply deficit, the City would need to allow flexibility from the general ordinance requirement as part of the PUD approval. In this regard, there is reliable research from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in its “Parking Generation” manual as to the number of parking spaces required for suburban multiple family buildings with access to transit. There is extensive transit coverage in the Silver Lake Village area, and Metro Transit is currently working on enhancing its transit stop capacity along Silver Lake Road. For such developments, a parking requirement equal to one parking space per .9 bedrooms can predict actual parking demand. The total number of bedrooms in the 464 unit project is 602, based on the projected unit mix (described below). The proposed 813 parking spaces results in a ratio of 1.35 spaces per bedroom, which should be more than enough to serve the project. The ITE manual also projects parking demand by unit count, with a peak accumulation for projects of this type at about 1.4 spaces per unit. This would result in a demand of approximately 650 parking spaces. Dimensional Requirements. According to the Ordinance, off-street parking spaces must measure not less that 9 feet in width and 19 feet in depth. While all surface parking stalls are shown to appropriately measure 9 feet in width, stall depths of 18 feet are proposed. This dimension is generally considered functional, but will require attention from the management during winter season due to snow plowing and accumulation. If possible given site dimensions, 19 foot depth parking stalls would be a better design. August 20, 2019 Page 9 Disabled Parking. According to the American Disability Act, required accessible spaces (for persons with disabilities) varies by the number of spaces in a parking lot. For parking lots which provide 501 to 1,000 spaces, two percent of the spaces must be devoted to use by disabled persons. For 813 parking spaces for example, a minimum of 17 disabled spaces are required. The parking plan for the parking garage has not, to date been provided. Thus, it is not possible to identify the total number of disabled parking stalls which are to be provided. The submitted site plan illustrates 340 surface parking stalls and 10 disabled stalls which is considered adequate. As a condition of Final PUD approval, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with American Disability Act parking supply requirements. Building Height. Both apartment buildings include a ground level parking garage and four floors above the garage which are to be comprised of apartment units. In this regard, the building is five stories in height (52 feet). While the PUD zoning district does not impose a specific height requirement and can provide for “flexibility” in this regard, it is important to note that the City’ R-4, Multiple Family Residential District imposes a maximum height requirement of 3 stories or 35 feet. As a condition of Preliminary PUD approval, findings should be made by City Officials that the proposed five-story building height is acceptable as component of a project which meets the intent of the City’s PUD requirements (for superior design and amenities). Emergency Vehicle Access. As a part of the review process, emergency services (fire and police) have reviewed the project and made a finding that proper emergency vehicle access is provided. As previously indicated, vehicle access to the subject site is to be provided from the east via Silver Lake Road and indirectly from the north via 39th Avenue NE. Specific comments from the department include the following: The City of St. Anthony is currently under the 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC), based on the 2012 International Fire Code. All plans will be reviewed according to this and any referred to standards in that code. The new fire code has been adopted but does not go into effect until next year. Any further plans will be reviewed referencing the code that is in effect at that time. Points to Consider: • Access Roads: Appendix D of the MSFC has been adopted by the City of St. Anthony and provides rules for access roads and turn arounds. Additional requirements are in Chapter 5. Specifically detailed is roads shall be maintained to within 600 ft. in sprinkled R occupancies. Coverage is adequate in the provided drawing. Details of the proposed access road on the west side of the building will need to be approved with final plan submittal along with plans for maintaining year around access. Also landscaping along the west side access August 20, 2019 Page 10 road needs to take into consideration fire vehicle height and size. Any potential trees along that road would be a concern. • Hydrant spacing appears to be compliant. Chapter 5 also covers spacing of fire hydrants. Hydrant placement is also tied to where fire department connections are placed. We do have some concerns with placement of one hydrant that would block access during firefighting operations if utilized. Proposed locations of fire department connections will need to be approved by us. • Building plans will be evaluated when submitted. Considerations such as key box locations, address markings, and fire lane designations are access considerations that will be evaluated at that time. As a part of Final PUD approval, the submitted development plans should be subject to review and comment by the Fire Chief. Unit Types. The applicant has provided the following information related to proposed unit types Unit Type Phase 1 Number Proposed Phase 2 Number Proposed Total Studio/Alcove 31 26 57 (12 %) One Bedroom 144 149 293 (63%) Two Bedroom 43 47 90 (20%) Three Bedroom 12 12 24 (5%) 230 234 464 (100%) As a condition of Final PUD approval, sample floor plans should be submitted which demonstrate compliance with applicable minimum floor area requirements of the Building Code. The floor plans will be subject to review by the City Building Official as part of building permit review. Building Materials. According to the submitted building elevations, the apartment buildings are to be finished in a variety of materials including the following: • Dark brick • Grey panels • White panels • Glass • Wood print metal siding • Colored accent siding • Metal (railings) The apartment building will primarily be finished in varieties of earth tone colors. Colored vertical accents are however, also proposed in strategic locations (to add visual interest). August 20, 2019 Page 11 The proposed building materials are consistent with Ordinance requirements and the color scheme is considered well-conceived. While graphic depictions of the apartment buildings have been provided, minimal information regarding the appearance of the clubhouse and pool building have been provided. As a condition of Final PUD approval, details regarding the design of the clubhouse and pool building should be submitted for City review. Landscaping. Appropriately, a preliminary landscape plan has been submitted for review. The plan illustrates generalized tree and planting bed locations. While the tree and plant locations appear acceptable, the landscape plan should be expanded to specify plant varieties and sizes. This issue should be addressed as part of the City’s consideration of the Final PUD. As part of the refinement of the landscape plan, it is suggested that consideration be given to accentuating the primary entrance to the site with an intensified landscaping effort. Consideration could be given to providing a landscape median or other enhancement near the eastern entrance to the site, between the garage entrance driveways and the sidewalk crossing to the east. The purpose of this recommendation would be to create a more prominent sense of entry to the project. While the main entry/access area inside the interior courtyard appears to be an attractive space, the view of the project from Silver Lake Road is understated – little attention is evident to the “front door” of the project site. Planning staff believes that an enhanced entry drive would benefit the project with the objective of making a more substantial presentation to the public side of the development. Sidewalks, Parks, and Open Space. The submitted site plan illustrates concrete sidewalks along the south, east and west sides of the site. Sidewalks are also illustrated within the interior court area. Connections to the surrounding area are consistent with the existing conditions, and should serve the site well. The site establishes an impervious surface coverage of 75% of the development property, apart from the parcel on which Salo Park is located. Current impervious on the site in in excess of 90% under the original Walmart use. While the resulting impervious exceeds the R-4 standard, it represents a significant increase in green space over the existing condition. With regard to parks, the City has determined that the original subdivision and plat of Silver Lake Village, in the establishment of the park use of Salo Park, has met its park dedication requirement with the initial PUD approval. Lighting. To date, a lighting plan has not been submitted for review. As a condition of Final PUD approval, a lighting plan should be submitted for review which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. August 20, 2019 Page 12 Signage. The Preliminary PUD application does not include any information related to signage. As a condition of Final PUD approval, a sign plan must be submitted which demonstrates compliance with applicable City sign requirements. Trash Handling. As a condition of Final PUD approval, the applicant should provide information regarding trash handling activities. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. The City Engineer has reviewed the project at Preliminary Plan stage, and has noted that issues related to civil plans will require technical comment and some attention, but none that will impact the Preliminary Plan documents or the general site planning. PUD Agreement. As a condition of Final PUD approval, the applicant will be required to enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. 3. Criteria for and Consistency with Criteria for PUD Approval. Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section §152.209. SUMMARY AND STAFF/PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Preliminary Plan PUD - Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. An access easement shall be in place to accommodate the northerly access to the subject site. Proof of such access easement shall be provided to the City as a part of the original or amended PUD documentation. 2. Access-related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 3. As a part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a plan of the enclosed parking area shall be submitted for City review. 4. The City finds that the proposed parking supply (and the deficit based on ordinance requirements) is adequate to serve the facility. 5. Internal parking stalls which exhibit “bumper to bumper” or “bumper to wall” conditions should be increased from 18 to 19 feet in depth. 6. Final PUD Plans demonstrate compliance with ADA parking supply requirements (for disabled persons). August 20, 2019 Page 13 7. City Officials find the proposed five-story apartment building heights to be acceptable (within the context of the PUD). 8. Sample floor plans be submitted which demonstrate compliance with applicable minimum floor area requirements of the Building Code. 9. Details regarding the design of the clubhouse and pool building shall be submitted for City review. 10. As a part of the Final Plan submission, the submitted landscape plan be expanded to specify plant varieties and sizes. 11. Consideration be given to accentuating the primary entrance to the site via an intensified landscaping plan and other elements. Specifically, consideration be given to enhanced architectural features as well as provision of a landscape median near the eastern entrance to the site, between the garage entrance driveways and the sidewalk crossing to the east. 12. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a lighting plan be submitted for review which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. 13. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a signage plan be submitted for review which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. 14. The applicant provide information regarding trash handling activities. 15. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 16. The applicant enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. 17. Consideration of comments of other City Staff. This recommendation is based on a finding that the proposal, with the conditions cited, is consistent with the requirements for PUD consideration, with the long-term objectives of the Silver Lake Village PUD, and with the recommendations and policies of the St. Anthony Comprehensive Plan. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Location map Exhibit B: Application and Supporting Material Exhibit C: Draft resolution THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 20, 2019 3800 Silver Lake Road NE Doran SLV –Preliminary Plan PUD Amendment to Silver Lake Village PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –SITE LOCATION PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD -ZONING PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –EXISTING CONDITIONS PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –PROPOSED SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD -VIEW FROM SOUTH PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –VIEW FROM NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –EAST ELEVATION CONCEPT PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –EAST ELEVATION PERSPECTIVE SKETCH PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –VIEW OF NE CORNER PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –VIEW FROM SALO PARK PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –MAIN FLOOR PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –PUD CONSIDERATIONS The proposal to have two residential buildings on a single development parcel and amend the PUD to conversion from commercial to residential land use. Building height (code is 35 feet/3 stories); applicant proposes approximately 52 feet and 4 stories (5 including the exposed portion of the lower-level parking garage). Parking supply (code requires 2 per unit, total of 928); applicant proposes 813 spaces –1.75 per unit or 1.35 per bedroom. Lot coverage/impervious surface (R-4 code limits this to 50%); applicant’s proposal is approximately 75%. Density (R-4 code limits this to approximately 24 units per acre, Comprehensive Plan calls for 20-40 units per acre); applicant is proposing approximately 35 units per acre. PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –PRIMARY STAFF COMMENTS Land use –conversion of site from commercial to residential use Plan details –height, site planning, landscaping Building architecture –massing, orientation, materials Access and parking –adequacy, accessibility Presentation –entry, views PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD –PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Consideration of a Resolution recommending a Preliminary Plan PUD Amendment for Silver Lake Village as presented by Doran SLV, and with conditions, including those recommended by staff. PRELIMINARY PLAN PUD -PROCESS Preliminary Review with Community Development Committee (staff) Sketch Plan Review by Joint City Council and Planning Commission Environmental Assessment Worksheet Preliminary Plan PUD Application – Public Hearing at Planning Commission; Consideration by City Council Financial Assistance Review and Consideration –HRA/City Council Final Plan PUD –City Council 7803 Glenroy Road, Suite 200 | Bloomington, MN 55439 |952.288.2000 | Fax: 952.288.2001 | www.DoranCompanies.com July 22, 2019 RE: PUD Amendment Project Narrative – Silver Lake Village Development – St. Anthony, MN Doran Companies has under contract to purchase a 13-acre site at 3800 Silver Lake Rd NE in the City of St. Anthony, for an exciting new multifamily development at Silver Lake Village (the “Project”). The lots current use is a vacant Walmart and Salo Park are currently zoned as a PUD and we anticipate going through a Preliminary and Final PUD Amendment process. We do not expect any physical changes to Salo Park. Doran Companies takes pride in the quality of multifamily housing projects that it brings to the community. The community areas and amenities are regularly second to none. This Project will be no different in either aspect. State-of-the-art amenities will include a clubhouse with a full-scale fitness center, game room, business center, entertainment suites, outdoor pools, spas, lounge chairs, community grills and gathering spaces. All interior unit finishes will be first class with quality fixtures, flooring, finishes and countertops that are synonymous with the quality of multifamily housing that Doran Companies designs, develops and constructs. In keeping with the Comprehensive Plan’s maximum prescribed density of 38 du/acre for this area, which would yield a maximum unit count of 494 units, the Project is expected to include approximately 460 apartment units constructed in two 230-unit phases. The Project will have approximately 8% studios, 3% alcoves, 52% one bedrooms, 26% two bedrooms, and 11% three-bedroom units. The Project will be four stories of wood construction over one story of structured parking which will be above grade to avoid conflict with the high water thresholds of Salo Park. The Project site is situated along the Eastern side of Silver Lake Rd NE and bordered to the West by Salo Park, the Soo Line Railway to the South, and Silver Lake Village Shopping Center to the North. Currently occupied by a vacant Walmart, the surrounding area has some of the City’s most popular shopping destinations. The site is also easily accessible being just 2 miles off Interstate 35W and about 6 miles North of downtown Minneapolis. Stormwater management for the new site will follow the current requirements and will utilize a drainage system in connection with the Salo Park Stormwater Pond adjacent to the site. We look forward to working with the City to further this Preliminary Development Plan submittal. Sincerely, Evan Doran Senior Director, Development 7803 Glenroy Road, Suite 200 | Bloomington, MN 55439 |952.288.2000 | Fax: 952.288.2001 | www.DoranCompanies.com Project compliance with the requirements of the Preliminary Development Plan: 1. Overall maximum PUD density range: Maximum of 38 dwelling units per acre 2.General location of major streets and pedestrian ways: Please see attached Site Plan. 3.General location and extent of public and common and open space: Please see attached Site Plan. 4.General location of residential and nonresidential land uses with approximate type of intensities of development: Please see attached Site Plan. Note that as a proposed Amendment to the existing PUD, all existing uses are intended to remain the same within the context of this submittal except for the existing Wal- Mart site being converted to multifamily uses. 5.Staging and time schedule of development: Applicant expects the project to proceed within the general timeline outlined below: •Site Entitled: Fall 2019 •TIF/Financial Package Approved: Fall 2019 •Wal-Mart Demo: Winter 2019 •Construction Start: Winter/Spring 2019 •Clubhouse (Leasing) for Phase 1 Open: Spring/Summer 2021 •Phase 1 (appx. 230 units) Open: Summer 2021 •Phase 2 (appx. 230 units) Open: Summer 2023 Project compliance with St. Anthony’s current Comprehensive Plan and the drafted 2040 Comprehensive Plan: The Silver Lake Village Multifamily development (“Project”) by Doran SLV, LLC (“Applicant”) meets the City of St. Anthony’s standards in the following ways: 1.Planning for growth in a developed community. The Twin Cities region overall is experiencing a period of growth, especially in areas closest to the region’s urban core. That growth is expected to continue through the year 2040. It is predicted that the overall regional population in 2040 will be older, more racially diverse and more likely to live in smaller households than the current population. The needs and preferences of an aging and diversifying population are likely to translate to a need for more smaller housing units and multifamily development, and, if trends endure, a continued preference for locating in areas closer to the urban center. Inner ring suburban communities like St. Anthony can respond to this regional trend by identifying areas where infill redevelopment is likely to occur. As a substantially built-out community, planning for an increase in population and housing in St. Anthony necessitates looking for redevelopment opportunity areas because little to no undeveloped land remains in the community. 2.Encourage expanded choices in housing location and types, and improved access to jobs and opportunities. 7803 Glenroy Road, Suite 200 | Bloomington, MN 55439 |952.288.2000 | Fax: 952.288.2001 | www.DoranCompanies.com Accommodate growth forecasts through reinvestment at appropriate densities Approve and permit reinvestment projects that make cost effective use of infrastructure and increased density. Adopt ordinances to accommodate growth and use land and infrastructure efficiently (examples: innovative zoning techniques for mixed use development, transit-oriented development, overlay districts, planned unit development provisions, and traditional neighborhood development overlay zones.) Plan for the re-development of underutilized commercial properties, especially those on higher volume streets and transit routes, for higher-density, multi-family and senior housing. There is an interest in increasing housing density in strategic locations (along transit routes or in underutilized areas). The City has housing for all types of families, households and residents at all stages of their lives. Prioritize mixed uses and allowing housing to co-occur within proximity to services, businesses, and critical infrastructure. 3.Silver Lake Village. This area represents relatively recent development, but the current vacancy of the Walmart building on the corner of 37th Avenue and Silver Lake Road has been a priority for St. Anthony. The Walmart building and associated parking lot are large and currently sit empty. A change in ownership and tenancy at the Walmart site is the most significant opportunity to bring new uses or redevelopment and increased vibrancy to Silver Lake Village. 4.Utilize the Planned Unit Development re-zoning as a tool at key locations to promote market flexibility, integrated land uses, density and walkability. EXISTING RAILWAY 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SAINT ANTHONY, MN PRELIMINARY PUD AMENDMENT PLAN: JULY 29th, 2019 Sheet Index SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME T 1.0 COVER SHEET A 1.1 SITE PHOTOS A 1.2 SITE PHOTOS A 2.0 LEVEL P1 A 2.1 LEVEL 1 A 2.2 LEVELS 2 - 4 A 3.0 EXTERIOR MASSING FROM S. A 3.1 EXTERIOR MASSING FROM N. A 3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION STUDIES A 3.3 VIEW FROM SILVER LK RD A 3.4 VIEW FROM CHIPOTLE / S.E. A 3.5 VIEW FROM SALO PARK C 100 EXISTING CONDITIONS C 400 SITE PLAN C 500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C 600 UTILITY PLAN EX-C FIRE TRUCK COVERAGE Site MapProject Team Structural: BKBM Engineers 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 PH: 763-843-0420 Architect: Doran Architects, LLC 7803 Glenroy Road Bloomington, MN 55349 PH: 952-288-2000 Surveyor / Landscape / Civil: Kimley Horn 767 Eustis Street Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 PH: 651-645-4197 Contractor: Doran Construction, LLC 7803 Glenroy Road Bloomington, MN 55349 PH: 952-288-2000 Developer: Doran Development, LLC 7803 Glenroy Road Bloomington, MN 55349 PH: 952-288-2000 Owner: Doran SLV, LLC 7803 Glenroy Road Bloomington, MN 55349 PH: 952-288-2000 Attorney: Doran Companies 7803 Glenroy Road Bloomington, MN 55349 PH: 952-288-2000 T 1.0July 26, 2019COVER SHEET 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE PID: 313023340028 10.6 Acres PID: 313023340030 2.4 Acres Unit Count RESIDENCE 1 LEVEL 1 STUDIO 5 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 33 2 BED 10 3 BED 3 53 LEVEL 2 STUDIO 6 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 37 2 BED 11 3 BED 3 59 LEVEL 3 STUDIO 6 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 37 2 BED 11 3 BED 3 59 LEVEL 4 STUDIO 6 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 37 2 BED 11 3 BED 3 59 PHASE 1 TOTAL 230 UNITS RESIDENCE 2 LEVEL 1 STUDIO 3 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 35 2 BED 11 3 BED 3 54 LEVEL 2 STUDIO 5 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 38 2 BED 12 3 BED 3 60 LEVEL 3 STUDIO 5 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 38 2 BED 12 3 BED 3 60 LEVEL 4 STUDIO 5 ALCOVE 2 1 BED 38 2 BED 12 3 BED 3 60 PHASE 1 TOTAL 234 UNITS GRAND TOTAL 464 UNITS RESIDENCE AND AMENITY AREA RESIDENCE 1 LEVEL 1:58,600 GSF LEVEL 2:58,400 GSF LEVEL 3:58,400 GSF LEVEL 4:58,400 GSF 233,800 GSF RESIDENCE 2 LEVEL 1:61,400 GSF LEVEL 2:61,200 GSF LEVEL 3:61,200 GSF LEVEL 4:61,200 GSF 245,000 GSF AMENITY BUILDINGS CLUBHOUSE: 9,300 GSF POOL EQUIP: 300 GSF 9,600 GSF AREA (NON-PARKING) TOTAL 488,400 GSF PARKING PARKING GARAGE AREA GARAGE 1: 98,500 GSF GARAGE 2:101,500 GSF 200,000 GSF PARKING SPACES GARAGE 1:233 SPACES GARAGE 2:240 SPACES SURFACE 1:129 SPACES SURFACE 2:211 SPACES TOTAL 813 SPACES RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 2 CLUB HOUSE N F.A.R. AREA (NON-PARKING) TOTAL 488,400 GSF / TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 566,647 SF = 0.86 F.A.R. Unit Size Range STUDIO:578 SF ALCOVE: 673 SF 1 BED:697 TO 926 SF 2 BED:1,106 TO 1335 SF 3 BED:1,650 SF VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 1.1July 26, 2019SITE PHOTOS 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE SITE LOOKING NORTHWEST SITE LOOKING SOUTHWEST VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 1.2July 26, 2019SITE PHOTOS 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE SITE LOOKING EAST SITE LOOKING EAST SITE LOOKING NORTHEAST VIEW FROM NORTH EAST SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"A 2.0July 26, 2019LEVEL P1 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE GARAGE ENTRY OPEN STAIR MAINT. TRASH DOG RUN MAINT. RESIDENCE 2 LOWER ENTRANCE CLUB HOUSE ABOVE POOL ABOVE FIRE APPARATUS ROAD ABOVE FILL FILL 240 GARAGE 2 SPACES 233 GARAGE 1 SPACES 54 SURFACE SPACES 133 SURFACE SPACES GARAGE ENTRY GARAGE ENTRY RESIDENCE 1 LOWER ENTRANCE TRASH OPEN STAIR ALIGN WITH EXISTING CURB CUTNEW FIRE APPARATUS CURB CUT N 214'-11"24'-0"18'-0"29'-0" 9'-0" 702'-7"214'-11"655'-6"50'-3"63'-2"146'-2"41'-4"83'-6"16'-6"LINE OF RESIDENCE ABOVE LINE OF RESIDENCE ABOVE 56'-7"234'-0"174'-7"RETAINING WALL & STAIR VIEW FROM NORTH EAST SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"A 2.1July 26, 2019LEVEL 1 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE LOBBY LEASING POOL SPA SPA POOL POOL EQUIP ENTRY FIRE APPARATUS TURN AROUND LOBBY MAIL LOBBY LOBBY MAIL 65 SURFACE SPACES 78 SURFACE SPACES 10 SURFACE SPACES AMENITY AMENITY AMENITY AMENITY N RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 2 CLUB HOUSE GRADE UP15'-4"67'-0"40'-0"40'-0"195'-5"153'-0"324'-4" 676'-2" 697'-5"174'-9"234'-0"141'-0"124'-1"72'-0"115'-5"106'-1"81'-1"RETAINING WALLS RESIDENCE 2 UPPER ENTRANCE RESIDENCE 1 UPPER ENTRANCE OPEN STAIR OPEN STAIR RETAINING WALL & STAIR VIEW FROM NORTH EAST SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"A 2.2July 26, 2019LEVELS 2 THROUGH 4 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE N RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 2 CLUB HOUSE VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 3.0July 26, 2019EXTERIOR MASSING FROM SOUTH 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE N RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 2 CLUB HOUSE RETAINING WALL AND STAIR GRADE UP RETAINING WALL AND STAIR MAIN ENTRANCE CLUBHOUSE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE RESIDENCE 2 LOWER ENTRANCE RESIDENCE 2 UPPER ENTRANCE RESIDENCE 1 UPPER ENTRANCE RESIDENCE 1 LOWER ENTRANCE OUDOOR AMENITY VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 3.1July 26, 2019EXTERIOR MASSING FROM NORTH 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE N RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 2 CLUB HOUSE RETAINING WALL AND STAIR GRADE UP RETAINING WALL AND STAIR MAIN ENTRANCE CLUBHOUSE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE OUDOOR AMENITY RESIDENCE 2 UPPER ENTRANCE RESIDENCE 1 LOWER ENTRANCE DOG RUN VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 3.2July 26, 2019EXTERIOR ELEVATION STUDIES 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE EAST ELEVATION ALONG SILVER LAKE ROAD SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION ALONG SILVER LAKE ROAD, RESIDENCE 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" RESIDENCE 2 RESIDENCE 1 WOOD PRINT METAL SIDING DARK BRICK GREY PANEL WHITE PANELACCENT COLOR PANEL PLANT ENTRAINED TRELLIS CLUBHOUSE BEYOND WHITE RAILING METAL RAILING VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 3.3July 26, 2019VIEW FROM SILVER LAKE RD. 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 3.4July 26, 2019VIEW FROM CHIPOTLE / S.E. CORNER 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE VIEW FROM NORTH EAST A 3.5July 26, 2019VIEW FROM SALO PARK 3800 SILVER LAKE RD. SITE CONCEPT PLAN July 29th, 2019 COLOR KEY AMENITY STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED STAIR / ELEV. STORAGE RETAINING WALL MINNEAPOLIS & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD SILVER LAKE ROADPROPOSED PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 230 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 PROPOSED PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 234 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 Lock to Lock Time Roseville Fire Aerial Width Track Steering Angle feet : : 7.92 8.50 : 43.0: 6.0 19.678.62 38.75 PREPARED FORFIRE TRUCKCOVERAGEEX-CSILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M . WURDEMAN07/17/201953113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNBPGBPGBMWThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\Exhibits\EX-C Fire Truck Coverage.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:44pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH THE VEHICLE MANEUVERINGS IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN WERE PREPARED USING AUTOTURN SOFTWARE AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT ACTUAL CONDITIONS NOR DOES IT ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL FACTORS. THIS ANALYSIS SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE SOLE BASIS FOR THE CLIENT'S DECISION MAKING PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE RETAINING WALL LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED REINFORCED TURF 9609 6 0 96096 0 961 961961961961961961 961 96196 1 961 96196196 1 9 6 2 962 96 2 9 6 2 96 2962 962962 962 962 962962962 9 6 3 963 963963 963 9 6 4 964 955960965 954956957958959961962963964966 960961962963964 9619629609609609 6 0 9659619 6 19619 6 1 962 962963963963964964 964 966 9 6 7 9 6 7 96596 5 964 964 966966966966 96 5 963 96 4 955960 953954956957958959961962963964 955 960954956 957958959961962962 PREPARED FOR EXISTING CONDITIONSC100SILVER LAKE VILLAGE APARTMENTS DORAN COMPANIES ST. ANTHONY MN DATE CHECKED BY SCALE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY KHA PROJECT 160665012 07/22/2019 AS SHOWN BPG BPG BMWNORTH PROPERTY LINELEGENDThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM K:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-EXISTING CONDITIONS.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:44pm BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPERVIOUS AREAPROPERTY 2 AREA TABLEPROPERTY AREA104,754 SF (2.40 AC)PRE-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA47,297 SF (1.08 AC)PRE-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA57,457 SF (1.32 AC)POST-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA47,297 SF (1.08 AC)POST-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA57,457 SF (1.32 AC)DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. BRIAN M . WURDEMAN 07/17/2019 53113 PROPERTY 1 AREA TABLEPROPERTY AREA461,893 SF (10.60 AC)PRE-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA38,800 SF (0.89 AC)PRE-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA423,093 SF (9.71 AC)POST-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA92,621 SF (2.12 AC)POST-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA369,272 SF (8.48 AC)TOTAL PROPERTY AREA TABLEPROPERTY AREA566,647 SF (13.00 AC)PRE-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA86,097 SF (1.97 AC)PRE-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA480,550 SF (11.03 AC)POST-DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS AREA139,918 SF (3.20 AC)POST-DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA426,729 SF (9.80 AC) A A A A B B B C C C C C C C C C C C C C C D D D D D D D D D E E E E E E E E E E E E E E F G L G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G H H H H H H H G H M C H I I I I I J J J K K K K K K K KK K K K QQ Q Q Q Q E E P P P RR R R R R S U S U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q T TTTT N Q K B A O O C O O O O O O O O T I CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN FOR RELOCATION. CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE PHASED TO HAVE PROPOSED RELOCATION COMPLETE PRIOR TO DEMO. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR PROPOSED RELOCATION. CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE PHASED TO HAVE PROPOSED RELOCATION COMPLETE PRIOR TO DEMO.PREPARED FORDEMO PLANC200SILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M . WURDEMAN07/17/201953113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNBPGBPGBMW1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 6.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ST. ANTHONY, HENNEPIN COUNTY COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13.REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS. 14.ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 15.IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 16.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES NORTH LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT KEYNOTE LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE EXISTING BOLLARDS REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING, AND ASSOCIATED FOUNDATIONS/FEATURES REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE/POWER POLE/SIGN AND ASSOCIATED FOUNDATIONS/FEATURES REMOVE EXISTING SIGN CLEARING AND GRUBBING REMOVE EXISTING WALL REMOVE STORM STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING FLAG POLE REMOVE EXISTING MAIL COLLECTION BOX REMOVE EXISTING FENCE SAWCUT LINE REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES PROTECT STORM STRUCTURE, ADJUST CASTING TO MATCH FINISHED GRADE PROTECT EXISTING HYDRANT PROTECT EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING HYDRANT A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U PROTECT ITEM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:44pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MINNEAPOLIS & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD SILVER LAKE ROADPROPOSED PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 230 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 PROPOSED PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 234 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 P1 PARKING ACCESS P1 PARKING ACCESS P1 PARKING ACCESS P1 PARKING ACCESS CLUBHOUSE POOL/AMENITY DECK EXISTING POND EXISTING MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL LINE OF LEVEL P1 BELOW LINE OF LEVEL P1 BELOW A A A A A A A A A A K A A B B B B M BB B B C C C C C C D D D D D E E E E E GG GG GG H H H H H I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I K K K L L L L L L L O O O O O O O O 18.0'24.0'36.0'24.0'18.0'7.0'24.0'7.0'24.0'7.0'12.7'16.7'24.0'18.0'24.0' 2 4 . 0 '18.0'24.0'36.0'24.0'18.0'7.0'15.0'10.0'18.0'24.0'18.0'5.8'7.0'15.3'R44.0'R20.0' O A 15.0'15.0'7.0'18.0'24.0'36.0'24.0'18.0'R74.0' R50.0' R224.0' R200.0' R30.0' R212.0' R188.0' R46.0'R64.0' R22.0' R50.0' R10.0' R10.0' R150.0' R150.0' R29.0' R8.8' R49.0' R25.0' R25.0' R49.0' Q PREPARED FORSITE PLANC400SILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M . WURDEMAN07/17/201953113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNBPGBPGBMWBUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS BUILDING AREA 58,600 SF (PHASE I) 61,400 SF (PHASE II) PARKING PROPOSED PARKING 340 SPACES (AT GRADE) 473 SPACES (P1, SEE ARCH PLANS) SURFACE ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 8 STALLS / 10 STALLS PROPERTY SUMMARY SILVER LAKE VILLAGE APARTMENTS TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 566,647 SF (13.01 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 371,419 SF (8.53 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 195,228 SF (4.48 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 430,715 SF (10.35 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE RETAINING WALL LEGEND KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HARDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SURMOUNTABLE CURB FLAT CURB STOOPS/STAIRS/RISERS - SEE ARCH PLANS LIGHT POLE TURF WITH SOIL STABILIZATION PAVING SYSTEM A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:44pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH SITE PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE P AND HENNEPIN COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY AMERICAN SURVEYING & MAPPING, DATED 4/18/2019. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8.TOTAL LAND AREA IS 13.01 ACRES. 9.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED REINFORCED TURF PROPOSED HARDSCAPING 960960960960 961 961961961962 962960960 960 960 965961961 961 961 961 961961961961 962962962963963963964966967967 961 961 9619 6 1 962962 9 6 2 9629 6 2 962962962 96 2 96 3 964 9559609549569579589599619629 6 0 9609 6 1 9 6 2 MINNEAPOLIS & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD SILVER LAKE ROADPROPOSED PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 230 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 PROPOSED PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 234 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 972972972965970961961962962963963964966967968969971960960 95 9 959 961961 9629639 6 0 9 6 1961961961961 962 962 963 963 964 964 960961960963963 972971 9 7 2 972963961 962 963 964 1.57% 1.52% 1.53% 1.82 %0.94%1.30%2.34 %0.99%2. 3 8 % 3.07 % 3.0 0 %2.23% 2 . 1 1% 1.05% 4.21% 4. 5 8 %2.03%2.29% 4. 3 7 % 3.42% 2.40% 3.41% 3. 1 9 %1.80%1.76%1.56%2.11%3.01% 2.3 7 %101.07%2.29 % 1 . 6 5% 1 . 8 7%2.12% 2. 0 2%3.98%1.6 6 %3.83%3.14%2.71%1.50%2.20%1.81%2.11% 2 . 1 1% 2 . 4 3%2.22% 1 . 4 1% 2.41 %2.27%2.12%2.18%2 . 1 2%2.12%2.07%2.12%0.81%2.17%1.50%1.51%9719722.07 % 1. 0 7 % 3.42% 5.18%DD D D DD DCLUBHOUSE FFE: 973.00 A A B B STRM-601 RE:971.50 STRM-600 RE:971.50 STRM-200 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER RE:962.75 IE:942.09 S IE: 942.09 E CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION STRM-300 RE:961.91 IE:955.90 S STRM-201 RE:961.72 IE:944.25 W IE:944.25 N STRM-301 RE:961.52 IE:957.03 SW IE:957.03 W IE:957.03 N STRM-100 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER RE:961.17 IE:952.70 NE IE:952.70 SE STRM-303 RE:960.18 IE:957.32 S IE:957.32 NE STRM-102 RE:960.17 IE:953.06 E IE:953.06 NW STRM-304 RE:959.94 IE:957.44 N STRM-501 RE:959.75 IE:953.60 E IE:953.60 S IE:953.60 W STRM-503 RE:959.53 IE:954.30 W STRM-103 RE:959.45 IE:953.84 E IE:953.84 W STRM-202 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER RE:958.91 IE:946.96 E IE: 946.96 W CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION RD-302 RE:958.71 IE:957.48 E STRM-104 RE:958.96 IE:955.50 N IE:955.31 S IE:955.31 W RAISE EXISTING RIM TO MATCH FINAL GRADE RE:958.45 IE:957.22 W REPLACE EXISTING CASTING W/ NEENAH R-2501, MATCH FINAL GRADE RE:958.34 IE:955.51 E IE:955.40 N RD-105 RE:957.07 IE:955.84 S RD-401 RE:956.17 IE:954.94 N STRM-400 REPLACE EXISTING CASTING W/ NEENAH R-1642 RE:956.60 IE:954.60 S RD-502 RE:955.78 IE:954.55 N RD-101 RE:954.93 IE:953.70 SW STRM-500 REPLACE EXISTING CASTING W/ NEENAH R-2501 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER RE:954.33 IE:953.10 E IE: 953.1 NW, E CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION 56 LF - 12" RCP @ 1.79% 17 LF - 12" RCP @ 2.00% 293 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50% 198 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.40% 90 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.40% 271 LF - 12" RCP @ 1.00% 216 LF - 12" RCP @ 1.00% 24 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.48% 62 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.48% 235 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.48% 22 LF - 12" RCP @ 2.00% 139 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50% 99 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50% 47 LF - 12" RCP @ 2.00% 17 LF - 12" RCP @ 2.00% 17 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50% C C STRM-602 RE:971.50 STRM-603 RE:970.87 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:44pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANC500SILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M . WURDEMAN07/17/201953113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNBPGBPGBMWNORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION LP:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) D SECTION A-A PROFILE 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1+00959.89959.892+00961.00961.003+00973.00973.004+00973.00973.005+00961.26961.26SECTION B-B PROFILE 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1+00961.00961.002+00972.08972.083+00971.57971.574+00973.01973.015+00961.00961.00RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 2 RESIDENCE 2 CLUBHOUSE COVERED PARKING COVERED PARKING FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GRADE FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GRADE SECTION C-C PROFILE 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1+00962.60962.602+00962.60962.603+00962.60962.604+00962.61962.615+00961.54961.546+00961.36961.367+00961.10961.108+00962.54962.54CLUBHOUSE EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN CONCRETE WALL, SEE STRUCTURAL CONCRETE WALL, SEE STRUCTURAL CONCRETE RETAINING WALL, SEE STRUCTURAL FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GRADE COVERED PARKING COVERED PARKING 4.34% 1.46%This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:45pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSITECROSS-SECTIONSC501SILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M . WURDEMANXX/XX/XXXXXXXXXDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNBPGBPGBMW MINNEAPOLIS & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD PROPOSED PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 230 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 PROPOSED PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 234 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 RELOCATED SANITARY MAIN EXTEND SANITARY SERVICE EXTEND WATER MAIN PROTECT EXISTING HYDRANT PROPOSED HYDRANT PROTECT EXISTING HYDRANT PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MH CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MH CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY WITH MH CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN DD D D DD DSSWR-105 RE:958.71 IE:955.36 W IE:955.36 S IE:955.36 E SSWR-107 STUB IE:956.37 N SSWR-200 RE:956.60 IE:955.25 E SSWR-106 BLDG SERVICE IE:956.00 E SSWR-201 IE:956.00 NW SSWR-102 RE:954.24 IE:950.89 W IE:950.89 S IE:950.79 NE SSWR-104 RE:953.53 IE:952.18 W IE:952.08 E SSWR-103 IE:951.52 N SSWR-101 RE:951.20 IE:949.85 SW IE:949.75 N EX SSWR-100 IE:948.41 S 51 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.24% 257 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.24% 96 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.24% 76 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.24% 108 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.24% 82 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.24% 31 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% 17 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% 21 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% EX SSWR-302 IE:947.85 N 62 LF - 6" PVC @ 0.49% SSWR-301 RE:948.90 IE:947.55 S IE:947.55 W 86 LF - 6" PVC @ 0.49% SSWR-300 RE:948.48 IE:947.13 E 8" BLDG. SERVICE STUB & FDC LOCATION 45° BEND CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER 8" BLDG SERVICE STUB & FDC LOCATION TEE PROPOSED HYDRANT 22.5° BEND CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER 45° BEND 45° BEND TEE PROPOSED HYDRANT 11.25° BEND 11.25° BEND TEE PROPOSED HYDRANT 8" BUILDING SERVICE STUB & FDC LOCATION PROPOSED 8" WATER PROPOSED 6" HYDRANT LEAD PROPOSED 8" WATER PROPOSED 6" HYDRANT LEAD PROPOSED 8" WATER TEE & 45° BEND PROPOSED 6" HYDRANT LEAD PROPOSED HYDRANT This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:45pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC600SILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M . WURDEMAN07/17/201953113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNBPGBPGBMWUTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20.ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. NORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C7-CIVIL DETAILS.dwg July 29, 2019 - 3:45pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCIVIL DETAILSC700SILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M . WURDEMANXX/XX/XXXXXXXXXDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNBPGBPGBMWPAVEMENT SECTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL PAVEMENT, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 10'10'1.0' LANDSCAPE LEGEND PROPOSED TREE (TYP.) PLANTING BED (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) CONCRETE PAVEMENT (TYPE TBD) MINNEAPOLIS & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD PROPOSED PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL 230 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 PROPOSED PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 234 UNITS L1 FFE: 973.00 P1 FFE: 961.00 EXISTING RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CONCRETE WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL REINFORCED TURF FIRE LANE This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\DORAN COMPANIES\Silver Lake Wal-mart - St. Anthony Apartments\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG July 29, 2019 - 3:45pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100SILVER LAKE VILLAGEAPARTMENTSDORANCOMPANIESST. ANTHONYMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.MITCHELL COOKASXX/XX/XXXXXXXXXDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16066501207/22/2019AS SHOWNGMCGMCMC1.VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITE WORK. 2.ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS, ARE TO BE SEEDED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SEEDING TO BE PER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STARDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2000 EDITION AND PER 2007 SEEDING MANUAL. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS WEEDS. MATCH INTO EXISTING, AS APPLICABLE. ANCHOR SOD ON SLOPED OR POTENTIAL EROSION AREAS, OR AS REQUIRED. 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF PLAN AND SCHEDULE DO NOT MATCH. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, LATEST VERSION. ADD FERTILIZER, HERBACIDE, AND PESTICIDE AS NECESSARY FOR OPTIMUM GROWTH. 4.PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4" TOPSOIL IN LAWN AREAS AND 12" TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE BEDS. ADD SOIL AMENDMENTS FOR OPTIMUM PLANT GROWTH. ALL PARKING ISLAND GRADES SHALL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT CROWN. 5.ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE EDGED WITH COMMERCIAL GRADE VINYL EDGING, "EDG-KING" BY OLY-OLA, OR APPROVED EQUAL, ANCHORED 4' O.C. WITH METAL SPIKES. 6.DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE COLORED, RED CANYON BY SYLVA, OR APPROVED EQUAL, AND AT A MINIMUM 4" DEPTH, FREE OF ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BYRAN RED ROCK, 1 1/2" - 3" DIAMETER, AND AT A MINIMUM 3" DEPTH. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC, WITH 4" OVERLAP AND ANCHORED. OWNER TO APPROVE OF MULCH. 7.SINGLE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING AROUND EACH BASE. DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RING, EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A RING TO THE DRIP LINE. 8.EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS, THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE AND COMPLETED BY A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF-SITE PER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. 9.CONTRACTOR TO WATER PLANT MATERIAL DURING INSTALLATION AND DURING ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. VOLUME OF WATER TO BE PER PLANT REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL GROWTH. 10. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL FOR ONE-YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AND OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE. 11.PROPERTY SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED(BLOWN-OUT) AFTER THE FIRST OPERATIONAL SEASON AND SHALL PROVIDE STARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING. IRRIGATION SHALL HAVE TWO-YEAR WARRANTY ON PARTS AND LABOR FOLLOWING INSTALLATION APPROVAL BY OWNER. PROVIDE BACKFLOW DEVICE, WATER METER, BOOSTER PUMP, CONTROLLER, RAIN SENSOR, WIRES, VALVE BOXES, SLEEVING, VALVES, ROTORS, SPRAYS, AND OTHER ACCESSORIES FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. 12.LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS TO BE ADDRESSED AT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT. LANDSCAPE NOTES NORTH THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. _____________ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN STAGE PUD, CONSITUTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SILVER LAKE VILLAGE PUD, RECOMMENDING THE SILVER LAKE VILLAGE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT OF 464 DWELLING UNITS AT 3800 SILVER LAKE ROAD WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village received a request from Doran SLV for an amendment to the Silver Lake Village PUD, redeveloping the site from a retail facility to a multiple family residential development of up to 464 dwelling units in two buildings at 3800 Silver Lake Road, legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, and Outlot B, Silver Lake Village; and WHEREAS, the property consists of approximately 13 acres is located in the Silver Lake Village PUD district; and WHEREAS, Lot 2 is currently occupied by a vacant retail facility; and WHEREAS, the applicant has conducted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the St. Anthony Village City Council has adopted a negative declaration for the need for an EIS; and WHEREAS, the project would be consistent with the St. Anthony 2040 Comprehensive Plan related to the conversion of this portion of the Silver Lake Village PUD from commercial use to multiple family residential use; and WHEREAS, the density of the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan density range for such use; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in support of the resolution for approval: 1. The property is located in an area of mixed commercial and residential use. 2. The proposed improvements to the property are consistent with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located. 3. The various aspects of the proposed development are consistent with requirements of the City’s high density housing requirements, or are supported by the goals and objectives of the requirements for PUD consideration, and the long-term expectations of the Silver Lake Village PUD. 4. With the modification to the site plan under conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission, the proposed improvements constitute a reasonable use of the property. 5. The redevelopment of the Walmart site has been an important objective for the community, including a highlighted goal of the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The proposed PUD will accommodate reasonable use without negative impacts on neighboring property nor on public improvements and services. NOW THEREFORE MAY IT BE RESOVLED, that the City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village accepts the findings and recommendations documented in the staff report and approves Preliminary Plan for Amendment to the Silver Lake Village PUD as shown on the plans submitted on July 22, 2019 and July 29, 2019, at 3800 Silver Lake Road NE: 1. An access easement shall be in place to accommodate the northerly access to the subject site. Proof of such access easement shall be provided to the City as a part of the original or amended PUD documentation. 2. Access-related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 3. As a part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a plan of the enclosed parking area shall be submitted for City review. 4. The City finds that the proposed parking supply (and the deficit based on ordinance requirements) is adequate to serve the facility. 5. Internal parking stalls which exhibit “bumper to bumper” or “bumper to wall” conditions should be increased from 18 to 19 feet in depth. 6. Final PUD Plans demonstrate compliance with ADA parking supply requirements (for disabled persons). 7. City Officials find the proposed five-story apartment building heights to be acceptable (within the context of the PUD). 8. Sample floor plans be submitted which demonstrate compliance with applicable minimum floor area requirements of the Building Code. 9. Details regarding the design of the clubhouse and pool building shall be submitted for City review. 10. As a part of the Final Plan submission, the submitted landscape plan be expanded to specify plant varieties and sizes. 11. Consideration be given to accentuating the primary entrance to the site via an intensified landscaping plan and other elements. Specifically, consideration be given to enhanced architectural features as well as provision of a landscape median near the eastern entrance to the site, between the garage entrance driveways and the sidewalk crossing to the east. 12. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a lighting plan be submitted for review which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. 13. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a signage plan be submitted for review which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. 14. The applicant provide information regarding trash handling activities. 15. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. 16. The applicant enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. 17. Consideration of comments of other City Staff. Passed in regular session of the City Council on the 10th day of September 2019. ____________________________________ Jerome O. Faust, Mayor ATTEST:____________________________ Nicole Miller, City Clerk Review for Administration: ____________________________________ Mark Casey, City Manager NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that on August 20, 2019, 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, the Saint Anthony Village Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to solicit public response to a request for an amendment to the Silver Lake Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) at 3800 Silver Lake Road NE, Parcel ID Numbers 31-30-23-34-0028 and 31-30-23-34-0030, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1 and Outlot B, both of the plat of Silver Lake Village in Ramsey County. This public hearing will be to consider the application of Doran SLV, LLC for a Preliminary Plan stage of the Silver Lake Village PUD. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission will make a recommendation regarding the proposed request to the City Council for their meeting expected to be held on Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Those persons having an interest in said meetings are encouraged to attend. Oral testimony will be accepted on the above subject at this meeting. Written comments may be taken at the St. Anthony Village City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony Village, Minnesota 55418 until the date of the hearing. Questions may be directed to the City Planner, Stephen Grittman, at 763-957-1100 or planner@savmn.com. The Planning Commission agenda and packet item relating to this application will be made available prior to the meeting online at www.savmn.com . Stephen Grittman City Planner