HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 06092020
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313
or email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe.
The meeting can be viewed live via cable channel 15 in the North Suburbs or the web broadcast at
https://www.ctvnorthsuburbs.org/live-tv/channel-15/. Due to health concerns and limited seating, we encourage
use of virtual option by using this link: http://www.savmn.com/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=306 There is also a dial-
in option available. Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person.
For those not in attendance, If you wish to submit a comment or question, electronically submit your comments
at http://www.savmn.com/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=306 no later than 5:30 pm on the day of the City Council
meeting.
Following guidance from state health officials, some City Council Members may choose to participate in
upcoming meetings electronically pursuant to MN Stat. §13D.021.
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call.
Consideration, discussion, and possible action on all of the following items:
I. Approval of the June 9, 2020, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.)
II. Proclamations and Recognitions.
III. Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approval of May 26, 2020, City Council meeting minutes. (pp.1-11)
B. Approval of June 1, 2020, Emergency City Council meeting minutes. (pp.13)
C. Licenses and Permits. (pp.15)
D. Claims. (pp.17-19)
IV. Public Hearing.
V. Reports from Commission and Staff
A. Update from Police Chief Jon Mangseth and Fire Chief/Emergency Manager Mark Sitarz.
VI. General Business of Council.
A. Reducing Speed Limit of City Streets to 25 mph. (2nd of 3 readings) (motion requested) Mark
Casey, City Manager presenting. (pp.21-25)
VII. Reports from City Manager and Council members.
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
JUNE 9, 2020
7:00 p.m.
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612-782-3313
or email city@savmn.com. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and safe.
VIII. Community Forum
Individuals may address the City Council about any City business item not included on the regular agenda.
Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at the podium, state
their name and address for the Clerk’s record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City
Council will not take official action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff
for a future report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
IX. Information and Announcements
X. Adjournment
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 1
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 2
MAY 26, 2020 3
4
CALL TO ORDER. 5
6
Mayor Stille called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 7
8
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 9
10
Mayor Stille invited the Council and audience to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 11
12
ROLL CALL. 13
14
Present: Mayor Stille, Councilmembers Jenson, Randle, Walker and Webster. 15
Absent: None 16
Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey, Assistant to the City Manager Charlie Yunker, City 17
Engineer Justin Messner. 18
Guests: None. 19
20
CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 21
ITEMS. 22
23
I. APPROVAL OF MAY 26, 2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 24
25
Motion by Councilmember Webster, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City 26
Council Meeting Agenda of May 26, 2020. 27
28
Motion carried 5-0. 29
30
II. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS – NONE. 31
32
III. CONSENT AGENDA. 33
34
A. Approve May 12, 2020, Council meeting minutes. 35
B. Licenses and permits. 36
C. Claims. 37
D. Resolution 20-049; a Resolution Approving a request to keep four (4) female chickens in 38
an R-1 zoning district at 2908 Townview Avenue. 39
E. Resolution 20-050; a Resolution Approving a request to keep four (4) female chickens in 40
an R-1 zoning district at 2816 Coolidge Street. 41
42
Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Webster, to approve the 43
Consent Agenda items. 44
45
Motion carried 5-0. 46
47
IV. PUBLIC HEARING – NONE. 48
49
1
V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF – NONE. 1
2
VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. 3
4
A. Resolution 20-051; a Resolution Amending of Community Center lease with the St. 5
Anthony-New Brighton School District for funds to be directed toward the Community 6
Stadium project and tiling of C2 & C3 ballfields. 7
8
City Manager Casey reviewed the resolution with the Council. 9
10
Superintendent Renee Corneille and Activities Director Troy Urdahl were at the meeting for 11
comments and questions. 12
13
Superintendent Corneille provided a PowerPoint presentation to the Council. 14
15
Director Urdahl explained the details of the stadium field turf. 16
17
Councilmember Jenson indicated the Council had their Worksession meeting with the School 18
Board and it was mentioned there was a specialist hired to help determine the type of turf to use 19
and he asked for more detail about that and how safe it is to use. 20
21
Director Urdahl reviewed the type of turf and the safety of it. 22
23
Councilmember Walker asked for more information on safety for the athletes and what the risks 24
are with turf and he wondered if the technology improved over the years. 25
26
Director Urdahl indicated the School District is toward the end of Metro Area School Districts to 27
consider turf and in many ways it is an advantage to them because they have had the benefit of 28
learning from other districts as they navigate this process. He indicated the turf technologies has 29
dramatically improved from the 1980’s to today. There are studies that now show that for youth 30
participants the synthetic turf is safer for participants then a natural grass field. He noted they 31
have spent a lot of time researching the safety of the turf and are confident it is a safe surface for 32
the students and community. 33
34
Councilmember Walker asked Director Urdahl to specifically mention what the concerns are 35
such as ACL/ligament type of concerns that come up all of the time. 36
37
Director Urdahl stated in terms of difference between a natural grass field and a synthetic turf 38
field, the one he has heard most commonly is rug burn and some type of rug burn that might 39
occur from using some type of synthetic field and might be the most common safety concern. 40
41
Superintendent Corneille explained what they have been told regarding this is the concern for the 42
well being of the students, especially those engaging with the turf. She indicated Mr. Ed Croix is 43
the Council Chambers and is an expert and sits on nationwide councils in regard to turf. His 44
major role is ensuring the safety of some extremely well-paid athletes and their ability to not get 45
hurt. 46
2
1
Mayor Stille explained Director Urdahl talked with the Council in their Worksession regarding 2
the history of the field and the drainage and he asked for Director Urdahl to address that again 3
because of the reason for doing this is to fix the drainage problem on the field. 4
5
Director Urdahl reviewed the history of the field and drainage problems due to sand and drain 6
tile issues. 7
8
City Manager Casey read the following emails to the City Council: 9
10
Ms. Karen Weibert, 3409 36th Ave NE: “I would like to speak to the track/football project at the 11
high school/Central Park. I would like to see the track brought up to a competitive standard, and 12
be available for residents, and students to access. I believe this is a good investment, especially if 13
students are being transported to Spring Lake Park. I would like to know how many and how 14
often. I do not believe the 10-million-dollar investment in AstroTurf for the football field is a 15
good investment. I think a minimum number of students / residents will actually benefit from its 16
installation. I would like to see a schedule of how that field would be used, as well as where the 17
numbers of participants come from. 18
The argument of being short of land for a new school is invalid. We are not planning a new 19
school, are we? .The entire community do not support this as they do not even know about it. As 20
I talk with neighbors and friends, people who do not have children in sports, they are very 21
surprised to hear about it. Will there be a similar investments in other extra- curricular activities? 22
There is little explanation on the District website. In this time of pandemic and unknown costs, I 23
would like to have more detail, and get more community input. With the size of our community, 24
this is a major investment for a few, especially if fences reduce the availability for everyday 25
use.” 26
27
Director Urdahl indicated they were extremely excited about the expanded use and availability 28
for the project. He indicated the use and accessibility will be improved with this project and in 29
the future this will be an open facility where in the past it was locked. He believed there may 30
have been a ten-million-dollar number associated with this and the actual cost of the synthetic 31
turf would be about a tenth of that. He indicated a new school is not in the plans. 32
33
Ms. Lona Doolan, 3511 Harding St NE: “I will not be able to attend tonight's meeting, and 34
would like to submit the following: 35
36
Regarding the Stadium Turf funding under consideration by City Council, I have a few questions 37
and comments: 38
39
1) I would like to know more about how the proposed reduction in leasing revenue fits into the 40
annual city budget and what expense(s) you are looking at to offset the loss in revenue? 41
42
2) How do we know this is a priority for most residents? What outreach has the city done to 43
confirm this is a priority worth cutting other services or raising taxes for? 44
45
3) Has an environmental impact been done? I have read that turf surface can get too hot to play 46
3
on and needs to be watered to cool it. What chemicals and particles will be running off the field? 1
How much will the watershed increase with the large change in impermeable area? Is the holding 2
pond able to handle the increase in runoff? How will nearby neighbors be impacted by the smell 3
of chemicals radiating from the field? Nativity Child and Family Center initially used a crumb 4
rubber mulch for one of their play areas and the chemical smell was strong enough that I would 5
get headaches when working nearby. They ended up replacing it with a natural product. Who 6
will be accountable for environmental issues that may arise from turf in Central Park? Will 7
taxpayers have to share accountability if the city is funding a portion of the expense? 8
9
4) There will be a significant amount of waste produced when replacement is required in 10 10
years. Whose responsibility will it be to fund the replacement and disposal of a football field 11
amount of waste? 12
13
5) Given the number of residents who are currently out of work and the unknowns of what 14
returning to school looks like this fall, I think it is worth asking the question if this can be 15
deferred until we are back to functioning within normal parameters. What happens if future 16
capital investment is needed to make facility adjustments for safe return to school and the school 17
has drawn down their levy source?” 18
19
Mayor Stille indicated the first question was for the City regarding proposed lost revenue, 20
$32,000 a year of proposed lost revenue that the City was anticipating coming because the City 21
was going to be increasing the amount of payments that the School District was going to be 22
making on their lease for the community center. The Council has not discussed that yet and 23
$32,000 is something that can and will be addressed but that will not be addressed until the 20/21 24
budget and will not affect the City at all until 2022. There was also a question in regard to what 25
happens at the end and if the City is obligated to contribute to get rid of the turf or other 26
maintenance items and the City is not making any recommendations, commitments or promises 27
to funding the disposal of the turf or dealing with anything such as maintenance. The City is just 28
helping with the lease payments on it. 29
30
Superintendent Corneille explained they try to surround themselves with experts and the 31
consultant was highly recommended. In regard to the waste product she knew that when they go 32
to replace just the turf this would be something that is built into the replacement with the 33
potential for recycling the material. She also knew there were concerns in regard to what is 34
going on today with COVID-19 and what school will look like in the future. She indicated this 35
is something they have spent a lot of time as a School Board talking through about timing in 36
regard to the use of the funds. What she understood is the funding sources being used is for this 37
type of activity. The money being used for this is money that is committed to that type of 38
updates and grades to schools, very similar to using the newest product on the windows. 39
40
Mr. Matt Able: “I would like to offer my support to and encourage the upgrade to the high 41
school stadium field to artificial turf as a whole community project. I feel that especially now 42
that the high school has its own soccer teams and that there is a lot of pressure being placed on 43
the grass fields that soccer and football teams utilize, that if the stadium field is upgraded to 44
artificial turf then the stadium could be utilized more with less damage, especially if the weather 45
has been bad for an extended period of time. Also, if the stadium is upgraded, it will greatly 46
4
benefit the booster soccer programs, along with the Kicks Soccer Program. Having turf on a 1
stadium field would mean that potentially all summer home soccer games could be played in St. 2
Anthony instead of having to utilize fields in places like Blaine for older players. If we have 3
more games on turf field it will help reduce the strain placed on grass fields that need to be used 4
by more then one program at a time.” 5
6
Mr. Dan Sprigs indicated he is an old ball coach and does not understand all of the politics but 7
what he did understand is that he has been teaching and coaching for twenty-five years and 8
volunteering for high school for fourteen years and for eleven years he was involved with the 9
booster program. He indicated he does not have any children in the district and as lived in St. 10
Anthony for twenty-three years. He stated what St. Anthony is known for is excellence. They 11
expect excellence in the children and have done a nice job of the children showing that but for 12
that to happen they have to show excellence towards the students. He quoted Aristotle. He 13
stated if we expect excellence from the children of St. Anthony then they need to show them 14
excellence and give them the best opportunity. When looking across the Districts and other 15
School Districts, those Districts have shown excellence towards their students and he felt that St. 16
Anthony should stand in the shadow of no other School District because of what we have here. 17
There is excellence in education and excellence in community support and in almost everything 18
that is done there is excellence. For this to go forward would just be validating what they have 19
already done for years and years and he thought this is a really great time for the students. He 20
also asked to get some sort of drainage because of all the bugs that are there and insufferable for 21
the children to have to participate with the standing water. 22
23
Mr. Chris Revendahl indicated he was a thirty-year resident of St. Anthony and employee of the 24
school district. He stated he has raised four kids in the community and has worked with so many 25
family’s kids. He has lived as a parent through tons of sporting events and schedules and getting 26
them scheduled and rescheduled, postponed, that it is easy without kids in those programs to feel 27
like perhaps that is a little bit of a myth or overstated. It is real and all the more so with kids 28
losing out on activities that need to move the lack of organized activities this summer with the 29
COVID-19 crisis, that need is all the more real. The need for available space is huge and has not 30
gone away. It has only increased as the number of activities and opportunities have increased. If 31
this can significantly increase the availability of space, the lack of need to reschedule, he thought 32
that was a huge plus for kids and in the end that is a huge plus for the community. 33
34
Mr. Jesse Kimmel stated he energetically supported this proposal along with many colleagues 35
and friends. 36
37
Mr. Ed Kriggs stated he moved into St. Anthony in 2016 with his family. He explained this is a 38
big deal to him and a supporter of sports and athletes in general and also what it does for the 39
community. He stated he wanted to comment on Councilmember Walker’s question a little bit 40
when he talked about the technological upgrades of turf and the Metro dome turf was the old, 41
what was considered Generation One Turf. That turf was solely developed to bring sports 42
indoors to be as safe as possible. That surf served its purpose but today turf is on Generation 43
Four. The current research actually shows that a lot of the safety issues has always stemmed 44
back to shoes. In the last three to four years the construction of shoes has changed dramatically, 45
from aesthetics to developing into player safety. The science and testing has shown that the 46
5
younger the athletes are the less of a safety risk there is. He reviewed how old turf gets recycled 1
and what it gets recycled into. He noted his one concern is with the temperature and will be very 2
few days that there will be excessive heat to limit its use. Watering the field will limit the heat in 3
the short term but for Minnesota it is a very nominal effect so the safety with the athletes will not 4
be an issue at all. He indicated he has not seen any adverse health affects with this turf. He 5
stated he believed in this project and has volunteered his services and is not asking for anything 6
in return. He just wants to do better for the community. 7
8
Mr. Scott Bentz stated he is the helmet program director for the St. Anthony Football Booster 9
Program, and he was representing the Football Booster Board. The St. Anthony Football 10
Boosters support this project and would like to see it go forward. Their program would benefit 11
from this greatly like many other programs in St. Anthony would. He stated this would not only 12
enhance the infrastructure and would build environmental responsibility as well. 13
14
Mr. Paul White, 3201 32nd Avenue NE: “I’ve been doing my best to understand the factors 15
related to the proposal to install artificial turf at the school facilities at central park. I’ve gathered 16
information in a very short amount of time, and am sharing my notes for your consideration. I 17
very much want to support this proposal but have not been able to find a comprehensive 18
evaluation of the alternatives under consideration. I list some conclusions at the bottom below. 19
20
Notes on School District/City consideration of artificial turf to enhance usage of school facilities 21
at central park: The issue at hand is the inadequacy of the football field and running track as they 22
are currently maintained. The information that I’ve seen from the city and school district appears 23
to focus on the “feasibility” of installing artificial turf, and does not appear to evaluate the pros & 24
cons of artificial turf vs. alternatives available to SAV (such as installing drainage, enhanced 25
natural turf options/other). I expect that there was thoughtful work along those lines, but I’ve not 26
been able to find it. 27
28
Dr. Troy Urdahl was very helpful, and sent me a download of information which I have reviewed 29
and much appreciate. Notable: 30
• Particularly helpful was the EPA study report for Part I of their evaluation of crumb rubber and 31
bacteria. 32
• It seems that the Part 2 report from that study has not come out yet, and could be very helpful 33
to inform decision makers 34
I’ve also looked for additional information and had conversations with a Parks & Rec director in 35
Baltimore, MD and had a serendipitous conversation with a football player from Saint Anthony 36
who has experience competing on both natural and artificial turf. I’ve done my best to try to stick 37
to unbiased sources of information. 38
The benefit of artificial turf appears to be that it may improve school & community access & 39
enjoyment to the football field and running track. The potential negatives appear to be in the 40
areas of community safety, environmental impact, and taxpayer cost as noted below: 41
1. SAFETY 42
a. MOMS TEAM article “Turf Wars: Pros and Cons of Artificial Turf”: 43
https://www.momsteam.com/health-safety/turf-wars-pros-and-cons-of-artificial-turf 44
i. Pros: 45
1. Easier maintenance 46
6
2. Less pesticides 1
3. Increased playability 2
4. Fewer injuries 3
5. Saves Water 4
ii. Cons: 5
1. Heat Island/Hazard—need to alter schedules to avoid summer afternoon use 6
2. Hazardous elements/chemicals (players & water runoff)* 7
3. Increased turf burns & bacterial infections* 8
4. Asthmatic impact 9
5. Lose option for natural turf permanently 10
*There is an EPA study “part 2” coming out in the future that will help define some of these 11
risks. 12
13
2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 14
a. Water quality impacts/benefits? 15
b. Crumb rubber—used tires looking for a home 16
c. How does artificial turf fit with SAV’s commitment to the GREEN STEP program? 17
d. Fairwarning article: https://www.fairwarning.org/2019/12/fields-of-waste-artificial-turf-mess/: 18
i. “Despite frequent claims by turf manufacturers that synthetic-turf fields are recyclable and 19
environmentally friendly, FairWarning found that worn-out playing fields and playgrounds have 20
limited second lives…” [goes on to describe how they remain a nuisance to dispose of without 21
viable recycling available] 22
23
3. COST 24
a. Taxpayer $’s at stake, though it appears to “fit” in the budget 25
i. As I understand, the school district has found a way to insert the costs into the budget in a way 26
that won’t show up as a cost increase due to other costs expiring (other than a $15-50/year city 27
levy on each homeowner depending on home value). 28
ii. I don’t know what the school board’s budget looks like, but must assume that $1-2.5 million is 29
significant. It would be helpful if the city and school district could present the various alternative 30
solutions to the public so that it can understand directly if artificial turf will be the highest and 31
best use for the taxpayer funds. 32
Conclusion: 33
Best I can tell, there has been a good effort by staff to explore options to expand use of these 34
facilities. It seems that there has not been any sort of documentation of the process that squarely 35
evaluates all options against one another--pros & cons. Considering the open questions about 36
safety, environmental impact, and the potentially irreversible and dramatic change that will result 37
at central park (some good, some not good), it seems prudent that an effort be made to preserve 38
the opportunity and bring the community along on this big decision: 39
1. Request extension of Hennepin County grant in light of pandemic and potential economic 40
impact on budgets 41
2. Attempt to lock in an option on the School District-City funding to give time for due diligence 42
3. Have a 3rd party consultant present a complete evaluation to the community of the issue, 43
potential solutions, costs and risks. 44
4. If moving forward, include in the vendor contract full indemnification of SAV against future 45
potential health/enviro issues, including (but not limited to) cost of reverting to natural turf if 46
7
recommended 1
5. If moving forward, require 3rd party certification that all materials are actually recycled. 2
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.” 3
4
Mayor Stille stated if this project does not move forward and the School District decides to move 5
forward the amendment of the City lease will not happen. 6
7
Mr. Brian Jones stated he has a unique perspective on all of this. He indicated he is a long-term 8
resident of St. Anthony. He was born and grew up in St. Anthony. He stated he played on the 9
fields for High School Football and has coached kids in all levels of sports on those fields and he 10
cannot speak strongly enough that he was in support of this investment and sees this as a value to 11
the community. He sees it as an opportunity that they have at this time to widen the base of 12
people that can use this facility. The fields are important, and the space is needed. He stated it 13
is important for him as a parent to have good facilities for his boys. He thought it was important 14
for the City to maintain its level of excellence to maintain the facilities and he thought it was a 15
great next step. He noted this proposal has his full support. 16
17
Director Urdahl indicated the School District has not entertained bids for a project yet as they 18
continue. The feasibility study that would be a next step and estimated project start dates would 19
be contingent on the contractor and their desires and it could be fall or spring, depending on a 20
contractor’s schedule. It is part of the bid flexibility. 21
22
Ms. Erin Jordahl Redlin, 3012 Armour Terrace, asked when the feasibility study be complete and 23
when the public get a chance to see it. She also wondered if the City would want to wait to see 24
the feasibility study and she also hoped that part of the study will include looking to alternatives 25
to crown rubber. She stated there are alternatives and hoped that would be part of the feasibility 26
study. 27
28
Ms. Shelby Ewing stated she was in favor of this proposal. She indicated she is the president of 29
the St. Anthony Soccer Boosters as well as also being one of the girls High School Soccer 30
coaches. She has watched and has a chance to coach many teams on that field during the 31
summer as a grass field and it was the Taj Mahal of everyone that came and played on it. Sadly, 32
as the years have gone on and the demand for the field has increased, so has the wear and tear of 33
the grass field and the school maintenance staff and Troy have done a great job of trying to 34
maintain it as much as possible but over the last few years it has shown its age and is showing 35
wear and tear. She believed turf fields would be the answer. It would be even better if there 36
were not any fences up. She thought this brings a whole sense of community. The Soccer 37
Booster is in favor of this. 38
39
Mayor Stille closed public comment. 40
41
Motion by Councilmember Randle, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution 42
20-051; a Resolution Amending of Community Center Lease with the St. Anthony-New 43
Brighton School District for funds to be directed toward the Community Stadium project and 44
tiling of C2 & C3 ballfields. 45
46
8
Mr. Matt Able stated he was the president of the St. Anthony Kicks Soccer reiterated that the 1
fields have taken a lot of use and they have to search elsewhere for field space for the older kids 2
because the fields are being utilized so heavily. The entire older kids’ programs rent space in 3
other communities for practice and for games and some of those fields are not all good either. 4
5
Mayor Stille asked for Council discussion. 6
7
Councilmember Jenson stated from 1986 to 2000 he was on the Sports Boosters Commission 8
dealing with baseball groups and all of those years there would be discussion about the lack of 9
fields capacity and that time it was always an issue of not enough time for practices, not enough 10
time for scheduling home games for all the sports and he was definitely in favor of taking this 11
next step and felt it was long overdue. 12
13
Councilmember Randle stated as a parent with a son who plays ball you really start to see where 14
they are lacking as a competitive edge and actually what is lacking for facilities. He also thinks 15
this upgraded is needed because they are not close to where they need to be as a facility. He 16
would gladly pay extra as a homeowner and taxpayer to do what they need to do. 17
18
Councilmember Walker appreciated the comments made tonight. He stated there are pros and 19
cons about artificial turf and it comes down to basically a cost benefit analysis in terms of a 20
decision that needs to be made. There are pros and cons and the issue is how big are the pros and 21
how big are the cons and he thought that is the key issue in making a decision about whether this 22
should go forward or not. 23
24
Mayor Stille indicated he learned a lot about this item tonight and it was certainly eye opening. 25
He was looking at this from a different approach and believed the School District will make the 26
right decision with regard to this as they move forward. He wondered if this is an appropriate 27
thing for the City to do and be involved. The City’s vision statement talks about being a thriving 28
community and he thought this is going to help immensely to help this community thrive even 29
more. When it comes to this, participating in a community asset like this, he thought it was an 30
exceptionally good thing. Then the question is how much, it is not fifty percent, this is primarily 31
a School District asset but thought nine percent is appropriate and he thought it would be 32
inappropriate for it to be zero. He would like where the City has landed on this. He stated he 33
was excited to be a part of this project and was supportive of this. 34
35
Motion carried 4 ayes-0 nays-1 abstain (Webster). 36
37
B. Reducing Speed Limit of City Street to 25 mph 38
39
City Engineer Messner reviewed the staff report with the Council. 40
41
Motion by Councilmember Randle, seconded by Councilmember Webster, to approve the first 42
reading of Reducing Speed Limits of City Streets to 25 mph. 43
44
9
Councilmember Webster asked what speed Minneapolis and St. Paul reduced their speed limit 1
to. Mr. Messner explained both cities reduced their speed limits to 20 miles per hour on 2
residential roads in May 2019 when the State Statute was revised. 3
4
Motion carried 5-0. 5
6
C. Resolution 20-052; a Resolution in Support of the Protecting Community Television Act. 7
8
City Manager Casey reviewed the resolution with the Council. 9
10
Mayor Stille understood that if this does not get changed back it could be an impact to the City 11
budget of some unknown amount. Mr. Casey indicated that was correct. 12
13
Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Walker, to approve Resolution 14
20-052, a Resolution in Support of the Protecting Community Television Act. 15
16
Motion carried 5-0. 17
18
VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. 19
20
Councilmember Webster stated the Village Fest Committee is scheduled to meet next week to 21
talk about the fate of Village fest going forward. 22
23
Councilmember Jenson stated on behalf of Metro Cities that he is a board member on. Metro 24
Cities has sent out three separate surveys in the last few weeks to the City Managers, Community 25
Development Staff and Housing and Public Works to gather information on City level expenses 26
and concerns related to COVID-19. He talked with Mr. Casey and was told information was 27
seen in announcements from Metro Cities. He reviewed the surveys with the Commission. He 28
noted on May 20th he sat through a Zoom seminar with Economic Development Association of 29
Minnesota and there was discussion about multi-family housing and the level of building that is 30
going to be going forward and basically what was said is that it is too early to tell what in fact 31
COVID-19 pandemic is going to have going forward other then the fact that it might slow down 32
somewhat. 33
34
Councilmember Walker stated the North Suburban Access Cooperation had a meeting last 35
Friday. 36
37
VIII. COMMUNITY FORUM. 38
39
Mayor Stille invited residents to come forward at this time and address the Council on items that 40
are not on the regular agenda. 41
42
Hearing none, Mayor Stille moved forward with the agenda. 43
44
IX. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. 45
46
10
Mayor Stille stated a lot of communities are doing what they can to promote their own 1
businesses and St. Anthony should be doing that as well. He noted there is an executive order 2
that is coming June 1st that will be allowing outdoor dining. The City Manager has put the 3
restaurant finder on the website. The thing he wanted to impress upon is that staff is very much 4
open to discussions about how to expand seating for the restaurants in the City. He encouraged 5
restaurants to consider that and staff will do their best to work with them. He stated Hickory 6
Hog and Fat Nat’s have already been approved for some expansion of their outdoor dining 7
facilities. He encouraged people to support the local businesses. 8
9
Mayor Stille stated he received an email from Suburban Ramsey Family Collaborative that are 10
seeking volunteers to sew gowns. He also asked people to wear their masks in public and be 11
respectful of people. 12
13
X. ADJOURNMENT. 14
15
Mayor Stille adjourned the meeting at 9:03 p.m. 16
17
18
Respectfully submitted, 19
Sue Osbeck 20
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 21
22
Mayor 23
ATTEST: 24
City Clerk 25
11
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
12
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY 1
CITY COUNCIL EMERGENCY MEETING MINUTES 2
JUNE 1, 2020 3
4
CALL TO ORDER. 5
6
Mayor Stille called the emergency meeting to order at 5:55 p.m. 7
8
ROLL CALL. 9
10
Present: Mayor Stille, Councilmembers Jenson, Randle, Walker and Webster. 11
Absent: None 12
Also Present: City Manager Mark Casey. 13
Guests: None. 14
15
CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 16
ITEMS. 17
18
I. APPROVAL OF JUNE 1, 2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. 19
20
Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Randle, to approve the City 21
Council Meeting Agenda of June 1, 2020. 22
23
Motion carried 5-0. 24
25
II. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. 26
27
A. Resolution 20-053 A Resolution Extending Period of Local Emergency and Extending 28
Curfew 29
30
City Manager Casey reviewed the resolution with the Council. 31
32
Motion by Councilmember Walker, seconded by Councilmember Webster, to approve 33
Resolution 20-053; a Resolution Approving Extending Period of Local Emergency and 34
Extending Curfew. 35
36
Motion carried 5-0. 37
III. ADJOURNMENT. 38
39
Mayor Stille adjourned the meeting at 5:58 p.m. 40
41
42
Respectfully submitted, 43
Sue Osbeck 44
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 45
46
Mayor 47
ATTEST: 48
City Clerk 49
13
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
14
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: June 9, 2020 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors Licenses:
Project Restorations, St Paul, MN
Truseal America, Burnsville, MN
Mechanical Licenses:
Liberty Comfort Systems, Anoka, MN
Krinkie Heating & AC, St Paul, MN
Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, Eden Prairie, MN
Temporary On Sale Liquor License:
Villagefest-Central Park
August 1, 2020
15
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
16
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY HRA CHECK REGISTER Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 5/27/2020 - 6/10/2020 Jun 02, 2020 04:40PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
11798 CENTRAL PENSION FUND LOCAL #49 41073 05/27/2020 5,760.00
10710 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 41074 05/27/2020 1,666.00
10252 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 41075 05/27/2020 4,212.05
10436 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES 41076 05/27/2020 14.25
1118 56 BREWING 41077 06/10/2020 1,052.00
1121 ABLE SEED HOUSE + BREWERY 41078 06/10/2020 1,046.00
10012 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY, INC 41079 06/10/2020 40.62
10098 ARAMARK 41080 06/10/2020 123.43
1100 ARTISIAN BEER COMPANY 41081 06/10/2020 13,259.25
10116 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC 41082 06/10/2020 173.84
2030 BALD MAN BREWING 41083 06/10/2020 464.00
1013 BELLBOY CORPORATION 41084 06/10/2020 5,112.67
1014 BELLBOY CORPORATION 41085 06/10/2020 395.79
10172 BIFFS, INC.41086 06/10/2020 182.14
2009 BLACK STACK BREWING 41087 06/10/2020 650.00
1018 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER 41088 06/10/2020 38,964.14
1011 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 41089 06/10/2020 6,429.31
1009 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS 41090 06/10/2020 2,897.34
1114 CANNON RIVER WINERY 41091 06/10/2020 468.00
1017 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 41092 06/10/2020 28,982.49
12596 CINTAS 41093 06/10/2020 964.74
10290 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON 41094 06/10/2020 4,942.11
10293 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 41095 06/10/2020 33.00
10308 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT 41096 06/10/2020 96.70
1010 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE COMPANY 41097 06/10/2020 412.00
1042 CRYSTAL SPRINGS ICE 41098 06/10/2020 382.03
10438 D ROCK CENTER & SMALL ENG 41099 06/10/2020 85.00
10373 DAILEY DATA & ASSOCIATES 41100 06/10/2020 4,382.71
12209 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES 41101 06/10/2020 143.80
10415 DIRECTV INC 41102 06/10/2020 487.22
10432 DORSEY & WHITNEY 41103 06/10/2020 614.00
2031 EARTH RIDER BREWERY 41104 06/10/2020 300.00
12484 EASTWOOD, SETH 41105 06/10/2020 125.00
10468 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC 41106 06/10/2020 5,608.20
10573 GOODIN COMPANY 41107 06/10/2020 205.29
10578 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 41108 06/10/2020 595.05
12930 GORDON, STANLEY L 41109 06/10/2020 27.43
12928 GREAT NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL 41110 06/10/2020 1,095.50
10624 HAWKINS, INC 41111 06/10/2020 5,192.68
10636 HEDBACK & CARLSON PLLC 41112 06/10/2020 3,500.00
10642 HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT 41113 06/10/2020 1,371.41
10661 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 41114 06/10/2020 225.00
12290 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 41115 06/10/2020 1,068.80
1019 HOHENSTEIN'S, INC 41116 06/10/2020 12,700.25
1027 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 41117 06/10/2020 4,156.20
12893 INNOVO AUTOMATION 41118 06/10/2020 695.00
11754 INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC.41119 06/10/2020 617.00
1016 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 41120 06/10/2020 40,144.16
1102 JOHNSON BROTHERS 41121 06/10/2020 12,014.52
1004 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.41122 06/10/2020 8,996.90
1005 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.41123 06/10/2020 11,152.92
1006 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.41124 06/10/2020 9,820.44
1044 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY.41125 06/10/2020 13,665.45
17
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY HRA CHECK REGISTER Page: 2
Check Issue Dates: 5/27/2020 - 6/10/2020 Jun 02, 2020 04:40PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
10785 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 41126 06/10/2020 1,998.14
10790 KILLMER ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.41127 06/10/2020 472.50
2028 LADONA CERVECERIA 41128 06/10/2020 216.00
12894 LEAST SERVICE/COUNSELING LLC 41129 06/10/2020 275.00
10861 LOFFLER COMPANIES - 131511 41130 06/10/2020 119.45
2010 LUPULIN BREWING 41131 06/10/2020 2,391.96
11985 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 41132 06/10/2020 14,296.76
2029 MEGA BEER 41133 06/10/2020 632.30
10932 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 41134 06/10/2020 425.00
10931 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL - WASTEWATER 41135 06/10/2020 60,863.66
10937 MIDC ENTERPRISES 41136 06/10/2020 633.31
11032 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 41137 06/10/2020 5,386.00
11017 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIP. COMPANY.41138 06/10/2020 136.75
12501 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 41139 06/10/2020 1,172.00
1051 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY 41140 06/10/2020 1,684.00
11131 NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORPORATION.41141 06/10/2020 766.75
11818 OB'S COUNTERTOPS & CABINETS, INC.41142 06/10/2020 620.00
11164 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY STATE 41143 06/10/2020 120.00
11185 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.41144 06/10/2020 285.00
1012 PAUSTIS & SONS 41145 06/10/2020 3,104.75
1001 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 41146 06/10/2020 8,174.71
1002 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 41147 06/10/2020 8,084.47
12747 PRECISE MRM LLC 41148 06/10/2020 50.00
2019 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 41149 06/10/2020 953.00
12311 PUCKETTS RECYCLING 41150 06/10/2020 80.00
12623 RACE FORWARD 41151 06/10/2020 1,000.00
1062 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY 41152 06/10/2020 353.00
12931 ROOD, LYNN 41153 06/10/2020 105.00
1020 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 41154 06/10/2020 117.54
11343 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET 41155 06/10/2020 111.80
12346 SHRED IT 41156 06/10/2020 37.77
11408 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS, INC.41157 06/10/2020 296.85
1024 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 41158 06/10/2020 7,868.32
1008 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 41159 06/10/2020 928.96
1026 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 41160 06/10/2020 19,454.73
1036 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S OF MN 41161 06/10/2020 614.77
11457 ST ANTHONY VILLAGE CENTER, LLC 41162 06/10/2020 2,321.25
2001 STEEL TOE BREWING 41163 06/10/2020 330.00
11531 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS 41164 06/10/2020 536.00
11552 TESSMAN SEED INC.41165 06/10/2020 550.18
11566 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 41166 06/10/2020 148.00
12702 TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 41167 06/10/2020 1,231.20
12927 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 41168 06/10/2020 2,690.00
11586 TRACY PRINTING 41169 06/10/2020 691.00
11595 TRI STATE BOBCAT, INC.41170 06/10/2020 3,500.00
11659 VALLEY-RICH C0., INC.41171 06/10/2020 942.57
11674 VERIZON WIRELESS 41172 06/10/2020 1,750.44
1025 VINOCOPIA 41173 06/10/2020 467.75
12644 WIN-911 SOFTWARE 41174 06/10/2020 595.00
12648 WINDSTREAM 41175 06/10/2020 53.11
1034 WINE COMPANY/THE 41176 06/10/2020 3,531.84
1038 WINE MERCHANTS INC 41177 06/10/2020 1,030.52
1032 WINEBOW 41178 06/10/2020 2,133.50
18
City of St Anthony Village CITY OF ST ANTHONY HRA CHECK REGISTER Page: 3
Check Issue Dates: 5/27/2020 - 6/10/2020 Jun 02, 2020 04:40PM
Vendor Number Payee Check Number Check Issue Date Amount
11731 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GRP, INC.41179 06/10/2020 74.58
11738 WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.41180 06/10/2020 19,500.50
11740 XCEL ENERGY 41181 06/10/2020 15,002.96
Grand Totals: 458,624.48
19
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
20
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Meeting Date: June 9, 2020
Reducing Speed Limit of City Streets to 25 mph – Second Reading
OVERVIEW:
At the May 4, 2020 City Council Work Session, City Engineer Justin Messner reviewed the attached
memo. By consensus of the mayor and council, Option 1, Consider changing to 25 mph, was
recommended for further action at an upcoming City Council meeting. At the May 26, 2020 City
Council meeting, City Engineer Messner presented the attached information.
In regards to changing speed limits, city of St. Anthony City Code refers to State of Minnesota State
Statute as stated below:
City of St. Anthony City Code section § 70.02 STATE LAW.
The regulatory provisions of M.S. Chapter 169, as it may be amended from time to time, are hereby
incorporated into this title by reference and will control the use of roadways and, unless obviously
inapplicable, semi-public property, located within the city.
(1993 Code, § 900.02)
As stated in the attached April 24, 2020 City Engineer’s memo, Minnesota Statutes, Section 169.14 as
revised in 2019, the City of St. Anthony Village now has the authority to adopt a reduced speed limit
of 25 mph on residential roadways under City jurisdiction. The pertinent language of this statue is:
•Subd. 2(a)(7) 25 miles per hour in residential roadways if adopted by the road authority having
jurisdiction over the residential roadway; and
•Subd. 2(b) A speed limit adopted under paragraph (a), clause (7), is not effective unless the
road authority has erected signs designating the speed limit and indicating the beginning and
end of the residential roadway on which the speed limit applies.
Traditionally, when we amend the City Code, the City Council has a reading of the proposed changes
at three consecutive City Council meetings and the amendment become official after being published
in the designated official newspaper. Even though the City Code is not being amended, staff
recommends following the same process with the May 26, 2020 City Council meeting served as the
first reading.
There has been no letters or calls since the first reading.
Attachments: April 24, 2020 St. Anthony Village Speed Limit Revisions memo
25 mph Streets and Proposed Signage exhibit
21
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
22
G:\Group Data\Municipal\Clients - Cities - Counties\St. Anthony\City Engineer\MEMO-City Wide Speed Limits-042420.docx178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COMMemorandum
To: Mayor and City Council, City of St. Anthony Village
Mark Casey, City of St. Anthony Village
From: Justin Messner, PE
Date: April 24, 2020
Re: St. Anthony Village Speed Limit Revisions
WSB Project No. 013266-000
In May 2019, Minnesota State Legislature passed a bill granting cities the authority to adopt a
reduced speed limit of 25 mph on residential roadways under their jurisdiction. Additionally, the
bill grants cities the authority to further reduce speed limits below 25 mph on roadways under
their jurisdiction provided the city complete a detail technical evaluation per the procedures
detailed in the state statue. County and state roads are not included in this authority. This went
into effect August 1, 2019.
The current speed limit on most streets owned by St. Anthony Village is 30 mph which was the
statutory urban speed limit set by the Minnesota State Legislature prior to August 1, 2019.
Lower speed limits are in line with national trends toward lower urban speed limits to support
safety. Recently the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul announced they are lowering speed limits
to 20 mph on residential roadways and 25 mph for larger collector and arterial roadways, stating
“Slower speeds on our streets make travel safer for everyone no matter how they get around.
Lower traffic speeds also reduce the likelihood of a crash and make a crash less likely to lead to
death or a life-changing injury. A person hit at 35 mph is three times as likely to die as someone
hit at 25 mph”.
City Staff recognize that vehicle speed and pedestrian safety are high priorities for the St.
Anthony Village City Council and residents and therefor we are providing the following options for
discussion at the upcoming May 4, 2020 Council Worksession.
Option 1, Consider changing to 25 mph
As mentioned above, Minnesota Statutes, Section 169.14 as revised in 2019, the City of St.
Anthony Village now has the authority to adopt a reduced speed limit of 25 mph on residential
roadways under City jurisdiction.
The pertinent language of this statue is:
Subd. 2(a)(7) 25 miles per hour in residential roadways if adopted by the road authority
having jurisdiction over the residential roadway; and
Subd. 2(b) A speed limit adopted under paragraph (a), clause (7), is not effective unless
the road authority has erected signs designating the speed limit and indicating the
beginning and end of the residential roadway on which the speed limit applies.
23
Mayor and City Council, City of St. Anthony Village
Mark Casey, City of St. Anthony Village
April 24, 2020
Page 2
The action necessary to complete this option would be to direct city staff to prepare an ordinance
revision and resolution adopting a new citywide speed limit of 25 mph on all residential roadways.
Following adoption of the new speed ordinance, City Staff would install “gateway signs” at entry
points into the City, indicating the citywide speed limit is 25 mph unless otherwise posted. Once
the gateway signs are installed, the 25 mph speed limit on local residential streets will be in
effect. The City will generally not be posting 25 mph signs on local residential streets.
Option 2, Consider changing to 20 mph
Minnesota Statutes, Section 169.14 further grants the City of St. Anthony Village the authority to
further reduce speed limits below 25 mph on roadways under City jurisdiction.
The pertinent language of this statue is:
Subd. 5h Speed limits on city streets. A city may establish speed limits for city streets
under the city's jurisdiction other than the limits provided in subdivision 2 without
conducting an engineering and traffic investigation. This subdivision does not apply to
town roads, county highways, or trunk highways in the city. A city that establishes speed
limits pursuant to this section must implement speed limit changes in a consistent and
understandable manner. The city must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit.
A city that uses the authority under this subdivision must develop procedures to set
speed limits based on the city's safety, engineering, and traffic analysis. At a minimum,
the safety, engineering, and traffic analysis must consider national urban speed limit
guidance and studies, local traffic crashes, and methods to effectively communicate the
change to the public.
The action necessary to complete this option would be to direct staff to complete a detailed
technical evaluation to determine speed limits on city streets following legislation procedures.
Once complete, City Staff will present their findings to the City Council for consideration and seek
public engagement.
Option 3, Leave speed limit as is
No action needed.
We look forward to discussing this topic with you and to gather some information regarding
pursuing or not pursuing options as presented to reduce citywide speed limits and to improve the
safety of our roadways. If you have any questions, I will be present at the May 4, 2020, Council
Worksession or you can call me at 651.286.8465.
cc: Jay Hartman, City of St. Anthony Village
Jon Mangseth, City of St. Anthony Village
24
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
Silv er Ln
FossRd
County Rd E W
38th Ave NE
ChandlerDrNEMacalaster Dr NEFordham Dr NESilverLakeCtPenrod LnShamrock Dr NE34th Ave NE
Kenzie TerraceLo wry Ave NE
C roftDrHighway88Silver Lake Rd32nd Ave NE
CrestviewDr31st Ave NE
Rankin Rd29th Ave NE Highcrest RdAnt h o n y LnS37th Ave NE
M a p l e w o od Dr
WalnutSt27th Ave NE
30th Ave NE
Armour Terrace WStinson BlvdPa hl AveRooseveltStNEEdward St NECoolidge St NEHarding St NEStinson Pkwy NEM u rray Ave
S k y croftCircleB el d e nDr36th Ave NE
OldHighway 8
Hilldale Ave NE
Townview Ave
Edgemere Ave
Wendhurst Ave
Skycroft Dr
!(City Major Entry Points*
!(City Road Entrances**
County Roads
Proposed 25 MPH
City Boundary
0 1,750Feet¯City Street MapSt. Anthony, MN Document Path: J:\gis\city\STA\Maps\CityCountyRoadsMap.mxd Date Saved: 5/15/2020 10:33:11 AM1 inch = 1,750 feet
*
**
25
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
26
Date Type Staff Present
June 15 Special
5:30 pm City Council Worksession City Council
City Manager
June 15 Special
7:00 pm City Council Worksession-Tour of the city City Council
City Manager
June 23 Regular Audit Presentation
Speed Limit Revisions-final reading & adoption
Recinding period of local emergency
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
July 14 Regular Planning Commission items from June
Quarterly Donations & Grants
City Council
City Manager
July 28 Regular
Liquor Operations Mid Year Report
VillageFest Presentation
Quarterly Goals Update
Wyland Mayor's Water Challenge
City Council
City Manager
Liquor Op Mgr
August 11 Regular
8:00 p.m.
Planning Commission items from July
SANB #282 Presentation
Approve 2021 Feasibility Study and Order Plans and Specs
City Council
City Manager
August 25 Regular Budget Presentation
Students in Leadership-Consent
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
September 8 Regular
Planning Commission items from August
2021 Preliminary Operating Budget and Levy-Public Hearing
Kiwanis Peanut Day
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
September 22 Regular
Fire Prevention Presentation
Night to Unite Presentation
Night to Unite Proclamation
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
Police Chief
October 13 Regular
Planning Commission items from September
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Waste Hauler Accounts-Consent Agenda
Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Utility Accounts-Consent Agenda
Quarterly Goals Update
City Council
City Manager
October 27 Regular Approval of CIP
1st Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater-Public Hearing
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
November 10 Regular
Planning Commission items from October
2nd Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater
Authorizing polling places for 2021
Declaring members of AB Ballot Board for 2021
City Council
City Manager
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
2020
27
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
November 24 Regular
Fire Prevention Poster Winners
Water Conservation Poster Winners
Final Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater
2021 Fee Schedule
Students in Government Presentation
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
Public Works Director
December 8 Regular
Planning Commission items from November
Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs
Setting Salary of City Manager
Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds
Setting the 2021 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy -Public Hearing
2021 Street Project Approve Plans & Specifications, Authorize Advertisement for Bids
Approval of 2021 Planning Commission Work Plan (motion only)
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
City Engineer
December 22 Regular City Council
City Manager
January 12 Regular
Planning Commission items from December
Housekeeping Resolutions
Resolution for the Street Improvement Bond Reimbursement
Quarterly Donations & Grants
City Council
City Manager
January 26 Regular
Public Works Snow Plowing Operations presentation
NYFS Agreement
Winterfest
Outside Orgs-Council
City Council
City Manager
February 9 Regular Planning Commission items from January
2021 Planning Commission Work Plan- (motion only)
City Council
City Manager
February 23 Regular
Administration Annual Report
Adoption of Strategic Plan
2021 Parks and Environmental Commission Work Plan- (motion only)
2021 Street Project Call for Hearing on Improvements, Call for Hearing on Assessments,
Order Preparation of Assessments
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
March 9 Regular
Planning Commission Items from February
Liquor Annual Report
Liquor License Renewals
GreenCorp Member application-resolution
CTV Presentation
Public Works Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
Liquor Op Manager
Public Works Director
March 23 Regular
Police Annual Report
Wyland Water Challenge
Public Hearing-Budget Calendar
City Council
City Manager
Police Dept
Finance Director
2021
28
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
April 13 Regular
Planning Commission Items from March
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Fire Annual Report
Spirit of St. Anthony Award
2021 Street Project Public Hearing, Order Improvements, Adopt & Confirm Assessments,
Award Contract for Construction, Call for Sale of GO Bonds
Arbor Day Proclamation
Earth Day Proclamation
Public Hearing-Budget Calendar
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
City Engineer
April 27 Regular 2020 Street Project-Approve Sale of Bonds City Council
City Manager
May 11 Regular
Planning Commission items from April
Insurance Renewal
Tort Limits - Consent
Order 2022 Feasibility Study
Police Department Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
May 25 Regular
Salo Park Concert Series
Chamber of the Year and Business of the Year
Finance Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
June 8 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council
City Manager
29