HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 20-081 APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN STAGE PUD FOR THE INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT OF 38 DWELLING UNITS AT 3725 STINSON BLVDCITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 20-081
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN STAGE
PUD, CONSITUTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SILVER LAKE VILLAGE PUD,
FOR THE INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT OF 38 DWELLING UNITS AT 3725 STINSON BOULEVARD NE
WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony Village received a request from Interstate Development for
an amendment to the Silver Lake Village PUD, developing the site for a multiple family
residential development of 38 dwelling units in a single building at 3725 Stinson Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the property consists of approximately .85 acres is located in the Silver Lake
Village PUD district; and
WHEREAS, The subject parcel is currently undeveloped and vacant; and
WHEREAS, the project would be consistent with the St. Anthony 2040 Comprehensive Plan
related to multiple family residential use; and
WHEREAS, the density of the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
density range for such use, when considering overall density in the PUD area and the remaining
developable land in said PUD; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report,
which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 18, 2020 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present
information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made no majority recommendation as to the Preliminary
Plan PUD; and
WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact in support of the resolution
for approval:
1. The property is located in an area of mixed commercial and residential use.
2. The proposed improvements to the property are consistent with the character of the
neighborhood in which it is located.
3. The various aspects of the proposed development are consistent with requirements of the
City's high density housing requirements, or are supported by the goals and objectives of
the requirements for PUD consideration, and the long-term expectations of the Silver
Lake Village PUD.
4. With the modification to the site plan under conditions as recommended by the Planning
Commission, the proposed improvements constitute a reasonable use of the property.
5. The density, parking, and other aspects of the site constitute reasonable accommodations
within the expected range of PUD consideration.
6. The flexibility offered under the PUD, including setbacks, parking, and impervious
surface are reasonably consistent with other development in this area of the PUD.
7. The proposed PUD will accommodate reasonable use without negative impacts on
neighboring property nor on public improvements and services.
NOW THEREFORE MAY IT BE RESOVLED, that the City Council of the
City of St. Anthony Village accepts the findings and recommendations documented in the staff
report and approves Preliminary Plan for Amendment to the Silver Lake Village PUD as shown
on the plans submitted on July 23, 2020, at 3725 Stinson Boulevard NE:
1. Access -related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City
Engineer.
2. In recognition of other development sites within the Silver Lake PUD which were
developed at densities less than 40 units per acre, the City finds the proposed
residential density (44.7 units per acre) to be acceptable.
3. The City finds that the proposed 20 -foot building setback along 38' Avenue NE
will not negatively impact adjacent properties and is therefore considered
acceptable (within the context of the PUD).
4. The City finds that the proposed parking supply (and the deficit based on Ordinance
requirements) is adequate to serve the parking demand generated by the proposed
apartment building.
5. The City finds that the limited size of the subject and target tenant base justify an
off-street parking supply which does not include covered spaces (within the context
of the PUD).
6. In consideration if the limited site size and previous site development conditions,
the City finds the proposed impervious surface coverage of 76.7 to be acceptable.
7. Impacts associated with the proposed impervious surface coverage shall be subject
to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer.
8. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a lighting plan be submitted for review
which demonstrates compliance with City requirements.
9. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a signage plan be submitted for review
which demonstrates compliance with City requirements.
10. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, details shall be provided related to the
proposed trash enclosure design.
11. Issues related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and utilities shall be
subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer.
12. The applicant enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary
securities required by it.
13. Consideration of comments of other City Staff.
Passed in regular session of the City Council on the 27th day of
ATTEST: i/ A
NiJoIJ Miller, City Clerk
Review for Administration:
Randy Stille, Mayor
, 2020.
Charlie Yunker, Interim City Manager