HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC WS PACKET 02282023CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
WORKSESSION AGENDA
Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 6:00PM
Join Meeting via Zoom
There is also a dial -in option available. Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so
in person.
Minutes
Approval Of CC WS Meeting Minutes
WS 2 -14 -23.PDF
Worksession Topics
2023 St. Anthony Pyramid
Charlie Yunker, City Manager, presenting.
SAINT ANTHONY PYRAMID 2023 V2A.PDF
SAINT ANTHONY PYRAMID 2023 V2B.PDF
Parks & Environmental Commission Open Seat
CHRISTINA BROPHY.PDF
JOHN HAGEMAN.PDF
CODY HOLLIDAY.PDF
ANDREW LARSON.PDF
TAP Program Application
Charlie Yunker, City Manager, presenting.
COVER MEMO.PDF
TAP PROGRAM FLYER.PDF
ULI MN TAP APPLICATION.PDF
ATTACHMENT.PDF
2016 SAV-TAP -FINAL PROGRAM REPORT.PDF
Future Worksession Dates, Times And Agenda Items
Future Agenda Items
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.PDF
Adjournment
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City
Clerk at 612 -782 -3313 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can
contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and
safe.
1.
A.
Documents:
2.
A.
Documents:
B.
Documents:
C.
Documents:
3.
A.
Documents:
4.
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGEWORKSESSION AGENDATuesday, February 28, 2023 at 6:00PMJoin Meeting via ZoomThere is also a dial -in option available. Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person. MinutesApproval Of CC WS Meeting MinutesWS 2 -14 -23.PDFWorksession Topics2023 St. Anthony Pyramid Charlie Yunker, City Manager, presenting.SAINT ANTHONY PYRAMID 2023 V2A.PDFSAINT ANTHONY PYRAMID 2023 V2B.PDFParks & Environmental Commission Open SeatCHRISTINA BROPHY.PDFJOHN HAGEMAN.PDFCODY HOLLIDAY.PDFANDREW LARSON.PDFTAP Program ApplicationCharlie Yunker, City Manager, presenting.
COVER MEMO.PDF
TAP PROGRAM FLYER.PDF
ULI MN TAP APPLICATION.PDF
ATTACHMENT.PDF
2016 SAV-TAP -FINAL PROGRAM REPORT.PDF
Future Worksession Dates, Times And Agenda Items
Future Agenda Items
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.PDF
Adjournment
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City
Clerk at 612 -782 -3313 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can
contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our Mission is to be a progressive and welcoming Village that is walkable, sustainable and
safe.
1.A.Documents:2.A.Documents:B.Documents:C.
Documents:
3.
A.
Documents:
4.
City of St. Anthony
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Minutes
February 14, 2023
Present:
Mayor & Council:
Randy Stille, Mayor, Bernard Walker, Thomas Randle, Wendy Webster, Jan Jenson, Councilmembers
Absent:
Thomas Randle, Councilmember
Staff:
Charlie Yunker, City Manager
Call to Order:
Mayor Stille called the Work Session to order at 6:01 p.m.
2023 Pyramid:
Staff presented the draft 2023 Pyramid that was the end result of discussion at the Goal Setting session
in late January. Council discussed the changes and agreed they reflected the desire of the Council.
Subsequent changes were discussed around moving the Core Values section under the Mission
Statement, which staff will do. The Council also discussed the wording of the Vision Statement and in
particular where to include “Inclusive”; either only in the Vision Statement, only in the Core Values by
revising that list, or in both sections.
Council did not come to a consensus on final wording, and asked staff to bring two versions for review
and schedule a Work Session on February 28th when all Councilmembers can be present.
Open Parks & Environmental Commission Seat:
Staff reported that Katie Godmare has submitted her resignation. This leaves on open seat on the Parks
& Environmental Commission. The questions was put to the Council on filling the seat by opening up an
application process, or reviewing applications from the most recent poll of applicants in late 2022.
Council discussed and asked staff to contact the recent applications to determine continued interest,
and to bring those interested to the next Work Session for review.
Future Work Sessions:
Next Work Session will be held on February 28th, 2022, at 6:00pm in the Council Chambers.
Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned at 6:51 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by Charlie Yunker, City Manager.
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
2023 Vision
Saint Anthony is a Village where
people can live, work, learn,
play and thrive
……………………………………………………
Mission
Promote a high quality of life to those we serve
through outstanding city services …………………………………………………………………
Supportive
CORE VALU ES
Exemplary
C I T Y S E R V I C E S
Infrastructure
& Amenities
Planning &
Permitting Governance Communications
& Engagement Public Safety Finance &
Administration
Saint Anthony
Village Wine &
Spirits
G O A L S
Environmental
Responsibility
Thriving
Village
Informed & Engaged
Community
Safe & Secure
Community
Fiscal & Organizational
Strength
A C T I O N S T E P S
INFLOW &
INFILTRATION
INSPECTION
PROGRAM
• Implement in early ‘23
CLIMATE ACTION
PLAN
• Assess the City’s role &
define scope
• Review existing plans &
draft Saint Anthony plan
• Identify goals & desired
outcomes
GREENSTEP CITIES
• Maintain highest
GreenStep 5 status
• Participate in Gold Leaf
Pilot Program
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
• Preserve naturally
occurring affordable
housing
• Monitor large-scale
corporate ownership
SENIOR SERVICES
• Work with community
partners to understand
position, future needs &
expectations
PEDESTRIAN & BIKE-
FRIENDLY ROUTES
• Plan for expansion &
enhancement with
future county projects
SINGLE WASTE
HAULER
• Implement in Spring ‘23
• Continue to monitor
curbside organics
program rollouts in
both counties
NIGHT TO UNITE
• Public Safety staff &
City Council
participation
SISTER CITIES
PROGRAM
• Plan for future Salo,
Finland visit by City
officials
FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEDICAL SKILLSET
EXPANSION
• Implement in early ‘23
TECHNOLOGY
• Implement new Police
Department records
management system
• Implement Lexipol
policy platform for the
Fire Department
MENTAL HEALTH
• Continue Public Safety
joint mental health
initiatives
• Connect residents with
existing mental health
resources
DEVELOP EXIT PLAN
FOR EXISTING TIF
DISTRICTS
• Draft plan with financial
consultant in early ‘23
CITY FACILITIES
• City Council tour of all
facilities to assess status
and future needs
STAFFING
• Address challenges with
recruitment of new staff
members
Responsible Effective Visionary Courteous
DRAFT
Inclusive
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
2023 Vision
Saint Anthony is an inclusive
Village where people can live,
work, learn, play and thrive
……………………………………………………
Mission
Promote a high quality of life to those we serve
through outstanding city services …………………………………………………………………
Supportive
CORE VALU ES
Exemplary
C I T Y S E R V I C E S
Infrastructure
& Amenities
Planning &
Permitting Governance Communications
& Engagement Public Safety Finance &
Administration
Saint Anthony
Village Wine &
Spirits
G O A L S
Environmental
Responsibility
Thriving
Village
Informed & Engaged
Community
Safe & Secure
Community
Fiscal & Organizational
Strength
A C T I O N S T E P S
INFLOW &
INFILTRATION
INSPECTION
PROGRAM
• Implement in early ‘23
CLIMATE ACTION
PLAN
• Assess the City’s role &
define scope
• Review existing plans &
draft Saint Anthony plan
• Identify goals & desired
outcomes
GREENSTEP CITIES
• Maintain highest
GreenStep 5 status
• Participate in Gold Leaf
Pilot Program
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
• Preserve naturally
occurring affordable
housing
• Monitor large-scale
corporate ownership
SENIOR SERVICES
• Work with community
partners to understand
position, future needs &
expectations
PEDESTRIAN & BIKE-
FRIENDLY ROUTES
• Plan for expansion &
enhancement with
future county projects
SINGLE WASTE
HAULER
• Implement in Spring ‘23
• Continue to monitor
curbside organics
program rollouts in
both counties
NIGHT TO UNITE
• Public Safety staff &
City Council
participation
SISTER CITIES
PROGRAM
• Plan for future Salo,
Finland visit by City
officials
FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEDICAL SKILLSET
EXPANSION
• Implement in early ‘23
TECHNOLOGY
• Implement new Police
Department records
management system
• Implement Lexipol
policy platform for the
Fire Department
MENTAL HEALTH
• Continue Public Safety
joint mental health
initiatives
• Connect residents with
existing mental health
resources
DEVELOP EXIT PLAN
FOR EXISTING TIF
DISTRICTS
• Draft plan with financial
consultant in early ‘23
CITY FACILITIES
• City Council tour of all
facilities to assess status
and future needs
STAFFING
• Address challenges with
recruitment of new staff
members
Responsible Effective Visionary Courteous
DRAFT
Inclusive
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
11/18/22, 1:03 PM https://www.savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4595
https://www.savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4595 1/1
Print
All applicants are required to be a resident of St. Anthony Village.Date Received
Name*
Christina Brophy
Home Address*
2608 27th Avenue NE
Zip Code*
55418
Phone Number*
651-485-3217
Email Address*
cbrophy724@gmail.com
Please select which commission you are applying for.*
In order for the Mayor and Council members to have a better understanding of your background and interests,
please provide the following information.
Why do you want to serve on a St. Anthony Village Commission?*
I have both a personal and professional interest in the development of our community. Professionally, as an Architect, I
understand first hand planning and land use in creating livable communities. As an resident living in SAV, I am interested in
our environment, how we exist in it, individually and together as a greater community, and what we can do to make it better in
the future. I would be excited for the opportunity to participate on the Planning Commission.
Please list your prior experience serving on a Board, Commission, etc.*
My experience with City Councils, Planning Commissions and Architectural Review Boards has been on the other side as a
representative for Clients. The projects I’ve worked on are varied, ie. single family variances, rezoning for multi-family and
commercial uses, architectural and historical design review, etc. What this experience has given me is an knowledge of city
code, ordinances, comprehensive plans, etc., what they are and how they work. Even though I have not served on a board
(yet), I think my professional experience along with my personal interest would be an asset to the Planning Commission.
Commission Application - Submission #4595
Date Submitted: 11/18/2022
Planning
mm/dd/yyyy
11/10/22, 3:05 PM https://savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4576
https://savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4576 1/1
Print
All applicants are required to be a resident of St. Anthony Village.Date Received
Name*
John Hageman
Home Address*
3530 Skycroft Drive
Zip Code*
55418
Phone Number*
612-270-1183
Email Address*
john@hagemanrealestate.com
Please select which commission you are applying for.*
In order for the Mayor and Council members to have a better understanding of your background and interests,
please provide the following information.
Why do you want to serve on a St. Anthony Village Commission?*
I work in real estate and want to use my 1st hand experience to help my community. I use "real estate" intentionally as I work
in a number of specialties including Realtor, property management, and have flipped homes. Before moving to MN in 2012, I
worked for the City of Golden, CO in their Urban Renewal Authority after I graduated from the University of Colorado with my
Master's in Urban Planning. I focused on tax increment financing but am very familiar with zoning, long rang planning,
stakeholder involvement and other aspects of the public planning process. In short I want to use my skills and experience to
make Saint Anthony an even better community.
Please list your prior experience serving on a Board, Commission, etc.*
I'm a member of the Environmental Board of Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors. There we're working with community
partners to encourage Realtors to promote sustainability. Additionally we're partnering with local builders & remodelers to help
create housing that is a viable product for the next 100 years. This means deep energy retrofits of existing building and well
insulated buildings that consume less energy. During my tenure with Golden, CO I attended monthly board meetings for our
Urban Renewal Authority. While not a member of the board, I became very familiar with the public meeting process including
Robert's Rules of Order. Also at that time, I served on the community advisory board for the 2011 US Pro Cycling Challenge.
In short think of it as a US version of the Tour de France resulting in a $1.3M impact on our community over a 3 day weekend.
Commission Application - Submission #4576
Date Submitted: 11/10/2022
Planning
mm/dd/yyyy
10/13/22, 7:59 AM https://savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4470
https://savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4470 1/1
Print
All applicants are required to be a resident of St. Anthony Village.Date Received
Name*
Cody Holliday
Home Address*
3528 Skycroft Drive
Zip Code*
55418
Phone Number*
6513879903
Email Address*
codyhollidaymn@gmail.com
Please select which commission you are applying for.*
In order for the Mayor and Council members to have a better understanding of your background and interests,
please provide the following information.
Why do you want to serve on a St. Anthony Village Commission?*
My family and I moved to St. Anthony in the fall of 2020. We have young kids who will be entering the Saint Anthony school
system next year and we intend on remaining in the village at least until they graduate, if not longer. I am committed to this
community and I want to invest my time and expertise back into this community. Joining a commission best suits my interest
and skills as an experienced government relations worker.
Please list your prior experience serving on a Board, Commission, etc.*
I am currently the Deputy Board Chair at Reach for Resources, Inc. In addition to this, I report to several boards in the course
of my work as a lobbyist.
Commission Application - Submission #4470
Date Submitted: 9/27/2022
Planning
mm/dd/yyyy
10/13/22, 8:01 AM https://savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4476
https://savmn.com/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/Print/4476 1/1
Print
All applicants are required to be a resident of St. Anthony Village.Date Received
Name*
Andrew Larson
Home Address*
3316 Edgemere Avenue
Zip Code*
55418
Phone Number*
2187313131
Email Address*
larsonar2@gmail.com
Please select which commission you are applying for.*
In order for the Mayor and Council members to have a better understanding of your background and interests,
please provide the following information.
Why do you want to serve on a St. Anthony Village Commission?*
To whom it may concern,
I am very eager to in join the Parks & Environmental commission for a number of reasons but first and foremost is to actively
serve the community in which I live. I find purpose in serving others and the opportunity to contribute to the City of St. Anthony
Village Parks & Environmental commission is a great step towards fulfilling my vocation.
My interest in community planning, local land use, and government processes also draws me towards this opportunity. I care
deeply about environmental issues and land use in my daily interactions with my family, neighbors, and local business owners.
The opportunity to continue advocacy for green spaces and environmental sustainability throughout our city in a more formal
role is of great importance.
Being an active participant in the decision-making process is another reason I am eager to join the commission. I will work to
bring diverse thought and having voices from different backgrounds given representation in the conversation.
Thank you for your consideration.
Please list your prior experience serving on a Board, Commission, etc.*
Ottertail County Parks & Rec - 2 years experience
Minneapolis North Side Green Zone Task Force: Member December 2020-Present
Elected to co-Chairman Minneapolis North Side Green Zone Task Force: March 2021-Present
Commission Application - Submission #4476
Date Submitted: 9/30/2022
Parks & Environmental
mm/dd/yyyy
MEMORANDUM
To:Saint Anthony Village City Council
From:Charlie Yunker, City Manager
Date:February 28, 2023 City Council Work Session
Request:Urban Land institute Technical Assistance Panel Program Application
BACKGROUND
At the November 29, 2022 joint Work Session with the Planning Commission and the Parks and Environmental
Commission, the group discussed the desired future use of the city-owned parcel at 38083 Stinson Boulevard.
Various ideas and desires were discussed, and centered around two areas:
Best use of the 3803 Stinson Blvd parcel
How to incorporate more green space into Silver Lake Village area
Given an absence of a consensus, a suggestion was offered to utilize Urban Land institute’s (ULI) Technical
Assistance Panel (TAP) to seek input from developers. The City utilized this program in 2016 in regards to the St.
Anthony Shopping Center area and its future redevelopment possibilities. That report is attached for reference
as to what the final product of the program can be expected to be. The objective of the TAP would be to help
guide future land use in the Silver Lake Village area by gaining insights from developers on what is feasible,
optimal, and what the City can do to address the ideas and concerns discussed at the joint meeting.
Staff subsequently contacted ULI to determine if the TAP program could be utilized. In short, the program would
consist of a workshop of industry experts that would review the project scope and provide their input on
defined questions the City would like addressed. Staff has drafted the below questions based on the discussion
at the November 29, 2022 Joint Work Session:
For the city-owned parcel, what is the best use of that for the area?
How could the City best increase usable green space in the area?
How could the City help reduce impervious surface and/or increase natural elements in the area?
How can the City guide future redevelopment in the area for additional green space and help ensure
climate change adaptability?
ULI staff provided the attached flyer that summarizes the workshop, and recommended a ½ day work shop at a
cost of $5,000 as an appropriate approach given the scope of the project the City would be requesting.
Since this exercise would be a continuation of the November, 2022 joint meeting, staff would arrange the
workshop as another joint meeting with both the Planning Commission and Parks and Environmental
Commission, appropriate staff, and the group assembled by ULI.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends moving forward with submitting an application for the ½ day workshop at the stated fee of
$5,000. Staff would recommend the workshop be a joint City Council work session with the Planning
Commission and the Parks and Environmental Commission, and appropriate staff.
DISCUSSION ITEMS FOR COUNCIL FEEDBACK
Below are the specific items for discussion and feedback:
Does the Council wish to move forward with the TAP program?
Does the Council have any revisions to the scope questions?
Other considerations for staff?
ATTACHMENTS:
ULI TAP program information
ULI application materials
2016 TAP program report
Move Your Project Forward
Technical Assistance Panels (TAPs) bring an unbiased, interdisciplinary
and market-based perspective to your specific development/land use
challenge or policy issue.
ULI Minnesota will assemble a panel of high-level land use and real
estate professionals specifically selected for their expertise relating to
the TAP assignment. Our panel can tell you what kinds of development
you can realistically expect and what tools you might use to attract the
development you want.
Ranging from one half to three days, the workshop is preceded by
analysis of background information provided by the sponsor, planning
sessions, community interviews, and site tours. The panel’s findings
and recommendations are documented in a written report. The cost of
these high intensity workshops and published deliverables ranges from
$5,000 to $30,000. Length of TAP is negotiated based on need.
Three-Day Workshop
This workshop is ideal for complex and comprehensive projects such
as freeway lids, that require significant time to fully understand the
issues, national expertise and to formulate strategic recommendations.
Half-Day Workshop
This workshop is ideal for projects that require less background
analysis to fully understand the issues and to formulate strategic
recommendations.
Why Host a TAP?
• You could benefit from an outside private market perspective.
• Completing a TAP may provide market specifics to make the project
more feasible.
• You may find it easier to secure regulatory approvals and/or attract
capital, as it will have the TAP report as a reference.
1/2 DAY OR
3 DAY WORKSHOP
TAP DETAILS
LET A TAP HELP YOU MOVE YOUR PROJECT FORWARD
CONTACT US AT 612-670-8147 I CATHY.BENNETT@ULI.ORG I MINNESOTA.ULI.ORG
5-7 INDUSTRY
EXPERTS
1 PRESENTATION
1 REPORT
$5,000 - $30,000
BASED ON NEED
Technical Assistance Panel
A ULI Advisory Service
HOST ORGANIZATION APPLICATION FORM
Please provide the following information and supporting materials in PDF format and send via email to:
cathy.bennett@uli.org. Questions? Call the office of ULI Minnesota at (612) 338-1332.
DATE OF APPLICATION: February xx, 2023
LEAD APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Saint Anthony Village
CONTACT PERSON: Charlie Yunker
TITLE/ROLE: City Manager
ADDRESS: 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 612-782-3315
EMAIL: charlie.yunker@savmn.com
Please attach the following required documents to this application:
1.COVER LETTER
Briefly state the need for a Technical Assistance Panel (TAP), including how the proposed TAP meets ULI Minnesota’s
Selection Criteria (below).
2.STUDY AREA SYNOPSIS
Define the study area and provide a one to two-page description including background information, previous development
efforts and their outcomes, and current or future plans and activities (both public and private). Also, include background
information on what is getting in the way of success of the proposed project, e.g. politics, community opposition,
entitlements, land ownership, market, pollution, lack of resources, etc.
3.SCOPE OF WORK
Provide three to four well-defined, answerable questions your organization would like the TAP panel to address for the
study area.
4.DOCUMENTED LEADERSHIP SUPPORT
Provide a letter from the municipality in support of the TAP process, agreement with the criteria outlined in this application,
and the program fee (as determined by ULI MN based upon the agreed scope of work). Letters of support from local
businesses, property owners, and/or community-based organizations are encouraged but are not required.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Strong local leadership capacity
A clearly defined scope of work, and three to four well-articulated questions to be addressed during the session
A clearly defined geographic boundary (a neighborhood, district, corridor, site, etc.)
Transferability to other communities in the region
Administration Department
Our mission is to promote a high quality of life to
those we serve through outstanding city services
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, MN 55418 612-782-3301 | www.savmn.com
February xx, 2023
Urban Land Institute
Technical Assistance Panel
1. Cover Letter
Thank you for the opportunity to request assistance from the ULI Technical Assistance Panel.
We hope you find our proposed project worthy of assistance. The Silver lake Village district is
located in Ramsey County, on the city’s northwest border with Columbia Heights and New
Brighton. The area was previously the Apache Mall, and was redeveloped about 20 years ago.
Additional redevelopment has taken place in recent years, with more likely to some, and
discussion around the desire for additional green space has risen to the surface. The City would
appreciate the perspective of development experts to offer to help guide future redevelopment
in the area to meet changing market needs and increased desire for green space.
The Mayor and City Council are strong, stable, and set sound public policy, and the Planning
Commission and Parks & Environmental Commission both comprise qualified and passionate
members. In addition, the city staff truly care about the future of the city and its residents. All
are willing and able to participate in the TAP process.
The city believes this project could be transferable to other areas in the region, where master
plans from 20-30 years ago are not entirely consistent with current and future needs and
desires. This presents a challenge to guide redevelopment differently and more closely than a
Comprehensive Plan alone can achieve.
2. Study Area Synopsis
The desired project area for consideration is below. The boundary of the project area is Stinson
Boulevard to the east, Silver Lake Road to the west, Silver lane to the north and County Road 93
to the south (generally). It is surrounded by a mix of single-family homes, multi-family
properties and small commercial properties.
PAGE | 2 OF 5
The existing land uses are: five high density apartment/condominium properties, with an
additional property currently under construction – which replaced a vacant big-box building.
The area has a large grocery store, and about two dozen additional retail and service businesses
such as a gas station, bank, restaurant, fast and fast-casual restaurants, auto service, and two
coffee shops. An additional bank is scheduled to begin construction in 2023. The overall area
totals approximately 87 acres.
3803 Stinson Boulevard
The City of St. Anthony owns one parcel in the
area at 3803 Stinson Boulevard, which is currently
vacant. Previous use was a gas station and small
retail. The City is in the process of removing the
abandoned, in-ground gasoline storage tanks.
PAGE | 3 OF 5
The project area was redeveloped about 20 years ago, with a vision of a great amount of retail
square footage than exists, due to the steady demand for high density housing. The city’s
Comprehensive Plan calls for mixed use in this area, which is consistent with its current use.
The area is part of the Silver Lake Village TIF district, which expires in 2031.
See the Comprehensive Plan document in its entirety here:
http://www.savmn.com/190/Planning
PAGE | 4 OF 5
Below is a map from Ramsey County, showing the parcels in the Silver Lake Village area:
PAGE | 5 OF 5
3. Scope of Work
• For the city-owned parcel, what is the best use of that for the area?
• How could the City best increase usable green space in the area?
• How could the City help reduce impervious surface and/or increase natural
elements in the area?
• How can the City guide future redevelopment in the area for additional green
space and help ensure climate change adaptability?
4. Documented Leadership Support
• Letter from the City Council
• Agree to criteria
• Fee
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL REPORT
St. Anthony
Gateway South District
St. Anthony Village
April 20th , 2016
minnesota.uli.org 1
Urban Land Institute Minnesota
ULI Minnesota is a District Council of the Urban Land Institute (ULI), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research and
education organization supported by its members and sponsors. Founded in 1936, ULI now has more than
40,000 members worldwide representing the full spectrum of land use and real estate development disciplines,
including developers, builders, investors, architects, public officials, planners, real estate brokers, attorneys,
engineers, financiers, academics and students.
As the preeminent, multidisciplinary real estate forum, ULI facilitates the open exchange of ideas, information
and experience among local, national and international industry leaders and policy makers dedicated to
creating better places.
Regional Council of Mayors
Supported by ULI Minnesota, the nationally recognized Regional Council of Mayors (RCM) was formed in 2004
and represents Minneapolis, Saint Paul and 46 municipalities in the developed and developing suburbs and
Greater Minnesota. This collaborative partnership provides a nonpartisan platform that engages mayors in
candid dialogue and peer-to-peer support with a commitment towards building awareness and action focused
on housing, sustainability, transportation and job growth.
minnesota.uli.org 2
Advisory Services
ULI has a long history of providing unbiased, market-based solutions and best-practice advice on land use and
building resilient and competitive communities through Advisory Services. At ULI MN, three advisory service
options are offered to policy leaders. Each option, including the Technical Assistance Panel (TAP), engages
ULI MN real estate professionals who volunteer their time and talent to contribute their wisdom and expertise.
For more information visit minnesota.uli.org.
Technical Assistance Panel (TAP)
The Urban Land Institute Minnesota District Council (ULI MN) convenes TAPs at the request of a community to
address specific development challenges such as site redevelopment options, downtown revitalization, or
environmentally sound development in an area.
TAPs consist of nonpartisan experts who offer recommendations, not mandates, based on the issue at hand
and the expertise of the panel. They are comprised of professionals from across the real estate and land use
industries including the commercial and housing sectors, architects, placemakers, designers, finance experts,
developers and more.
Panelists evaluate data, site conditions and future redevelopment readiness and to provide local policy leaders
with recommendations to guide not only future land uses for the site, but also future partnerships with
developers. The goal is to offer ideas for realizing local and regional aspirations. The working session’s focus
helps synthesize local input with panel expertise to form a final set of recommendations.
“With the assistance of a ULI MN Technical Assistance Panel (TAP), our city has
moved forward on a key redevelopment project that expands rental housing options
for residents. The TAP provided immeasurable assistance and was vital in guiding
the strategic direction for the property.”
Mayor Sandra Martin, City of Shorview
minnesota.uli.org 3
The Panel
Panel members are ULI MN members and experts who volunteer their time because of a commitment to the
principles of redevelopment, planned growth, economic expansion and local and regional capacity-building.
Panel ULI Minnesota Staff
Michael Fischer, LHB, Inc. TAP Chair
James Lehnhoff, Aeon
Sarah White, Artspace Projects, Inc.
Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers
Paul Maener, Maener Properties
Mike Sturdivant, Paster Properties
Cathy Bennett
Gordon Hughes
David Baur
The Panel’s Charge
St. Anthony Village is a community of increasing prosperity with growing property values, a convenient location
in the metro, and a school district that entices families to move even just a few blocks to get into it. After nearly
twenty years of looking at the Gateway South District as a redevelopment target, the City believes the time is
right to begin taking more deliberate actions to make that happen. To that end, how can St. Anthony Village
best prepare and position Gateway South for redevelopment in today’s market?
The panelists at the half-day TAP considered this overarching question and several more granular ones to
develop insights and recommendations for moving forward. TAP participants looked at existing site uses,
infrastructure configurations including streets and cycling paths, and considered how the Gateway South
District integrates with the surrounding community both now and in the future. They considered what types of
uses would be a good fit for redevelopment, what kinds of businesses might succeed here, and steps the City
can take ahead of time to be ready when private sector project proposals are presented.
The TAP culminated in a lively discussion between panelists, elected and appointed officials, and staff
members about the possibilities that exist in the study area. There was broad agreement that it is an area with
great potential, though it may take a number of years to see substantial change. The report that follows
compiles the thoughts and findings of the panel in hopes that it will help St. Anthony Village move forward with
developing and implementing a vision for the future of the Gateway South District. The “Panel Findings”
section provides overarching suggestions and concepts while the “Panel Reaction to Questions” area
specifically addresses questions provided by St. Anthony Village.
minnesota.uli.org 4
Gateway South Redevelopment Area Background
The Gateway South District has been on the city’s priority list for further study and planning since the
Comprehensive Plan update of 2008. The economic downturn slowed the interest in redevelopment in the
intervening years, and now there is renewed development interest in the area and St. Anthony as a whole.
The site is situated between Highway 88 (New Brighton Boulevard), St. Anthony Boulevard, and Kenzie
Terrace on the southwestern-most part of the city and serves as a gateway to St. Anthony. It is surrounded by
single-family homes on the north/northwest and south, and a cemetery to the east.
There are 22 distinct parcels within the study area with 40 different property owners, 18 of which are located
within the Northgate Office Park, a former hotel that became office space. From the St. Anthony 2010 zoning
map, the study area is currently zoned for Commercial and Planned Unit Development (PUD). There are five
smaller parcels in the southwest corner of the study area that are zoned R1 – Single Family Residential. The
current Comprehensive Plan calls for multi-family housing and mixed use in the study area.
Existing land uses include two
strip mall developments, a former
motel which is now being used
for condominium owned office
space, a small multi-tenant
building, a gas station, three
vacant parcels, the St. Anthony
liquor store parcel, and two
senior housing developments
(Autumn Woods and Walker).
The overall area totals
approximately 26 acres, of which
about half is considered
potentially re-developable.
The study area has been the
focus of discussion for up to 20
years, with a visioning exercise
completed 15 years ago. The
city’s Comprehensive Plan also
calls for closer examination and
re- development of the “Kenzie
Terrace District” with multi-family
housing and mixed use.
However, it was clear in the
comprehensive plan that the City
desires any re-development to
be be initiated and led by the
private market.
minnesota.uli.org 5
Panel Findings
These findings are based on the panel’s opinions and analyses as real estate, architecture, finance, and
development professionals regarding what would best position Gateway South for redevelopment in the
coming years. While the panel considers these ideas and suggestions sound, they are not directives. There is
no substitute for developers with motivation and vision. Should partners come to the table with proposals that
do not align with these findings but otherwise meets the City’s goals, there should be no hesitation in moving
forward.
The area will need a catalyst to spur significant redevelopment
St. Anthony is an increasingly attractive location in the metro area with growing demand for housing,
particularly from families looking to get into the City’s highly rated school district. The study area is positioned
with great connectivity to job centers, commercial areas, and recreation. For these reasons, redevelopment in
the Gateway South District is a matter of when, not if.
Still, the study area today exists in a tricky middle ground in terms of its development lifecycle, particularly for
the St. Anthony Shopping Center. Land values are strong and appear to be growing, which means site
acquisition will be costly. The existing structures may not be the best possible use of the land, but neither are
they dilapidated to the point where the value of the land vastly outweighs that of the buildings. These
conditions mean a developer would find it challenging to profitably redevelop the site without either significant
investment from the City, and/or a catalytic transformation elsewhere in the study area. As such, the findings
and suggestions below are largely focused on activities in which the City can engage to prepare and position
for redevelopment when it comes as well as the types of changes that could be the necessary catalyst to
trigger wider redevelopment in the study area.
Create a strong vision for redevelopment, share it with the community, and then support it
Because redevelopment is likely to unfold over an extended
period, the City and community have time to develop a vision
for what it wants here and the opportunity to build long term
buy-in to support it. What does the City want to see? What do
residents want? What level of housing density will be
supported? How will this area enhance, complement, and
interact with the surrounding area including other development
opportunities that may arise? Answering these types of
questions gives the City something to work towards and helps
prospective developers understand the types of projects to
which the City will be most receptive. This is likely to make the actual redevelopment process smoother and
quicker as projects come forward.
Once a vision is created, the City should promote that vision and support it with policy. This could mean
assisting with land assembly by purchasing parcels as they become available (e.g. buying units in the office
condo) or making zoning, code or land use policy changes ahead of time if they will be necessary to meet the
vision’s goals. While it’s not necessary to have specific offers on the table with respect to financing options like
TIF districts or tax abatement, it’s helpful to developers to provide guidance on what types of policies the City is
willing to entertain for a high quality proposal. Above all, developers will appreciate proactive vision, leadership
and a willingness to collaborate to solve problems–characteristics St. Anthony has demonstrated in the past.
“This isn't going to happen all at
once. Allowing it to happen
organically makes it more likely
to get something unique to the
area.”
Paul Maener, Maener Properties
minnesota.uli.org 6
Focus on placemaking on and around the site
With a stable shopping center, city owned land, and a good partnership with the senior housing developer, the
biggest opportunity right now is placemaking around the site to position it for when redevelopment
opportunities arrive. Investing in improvements to the public realm not only improves the experience for
existing users and the community but has the added benefit of signaling to the market that the City is
committed to the district’s future. The panel identified several possible placemaking opportunities the City may
wish to consider.
• Create welcoming entry points to the Gateway South District
The clearest opportunity for this lies at the southwestern corner on the bank-owned parcel where Lowry
Avenue meets Kenzie Terrace. Turning this site into a pleasant green space that welcomes visitors to St.
Anthony can help transform the arrival experience to the area. A similar approach would be ideal at the
meeting points of Kenzie Terrace, Hwy 88, and St. Anthony Boulevard, but the panel recognizes this may
be more difficult with the already-successful Village Pub on site and facing inward away from the road.
• Pursue an improved public realm and streetscaping, especially at Kenzie Terrace
The study area is bordered on both the west and east by high capacity roads with fast-moving automobile
traffic, a design challenge that can make the Gateway South District feel like an isolated island rather
than a destination. The panel recognizes that changes to New Brighton Boulevard are unlikely for the
foreseeable future, but Kenzie Terrace presents real opportunity. The current configuration of Kenzie
seems overbuilt for its traffic volume and is adjacent and connected to residential areas that would be
likely users of retail in the area. A reconfigured, calmed Kenzie Terrace with fewer and/or narrow lanes,
wide sidewalks, and improved streetscaping would encourage pedestrian activity and improve quality of
life for current and future residents within the Gateway South District and the surrounding neighborhoods.
Improved bikeability should also be a priority for the area as a recreational amenity, commuting option,
and a potential driver of retail trips. With the Minneapolis Diagonal Trail just across New Brighton
Boulevard, the Gateway South District could be the ideal solution to the “missing link” of the Grand
Rounds Scenic Byway, a project for which it might be possible to obtain regional, state or federal funding
assistance. This connection could be accomplished via Kenzie Terrace or by using the existing rights of
way in the site.
• Preserve and improve existing rights of way
It’s tempting when looking at large redevelopment
opportunities to start from scratch or to vacate
rights of way to make things easier, but the panel
sees value in the existing rights of way within
Gateway South. For example, Pentagon Drive
today is fronted on its northeastern side by the
existing St. Anthony Shopping Center. With a
complementary stretch of small storefront retail on
the opposite side, it could create a “Main Street”
type of experience while encouraging movement
through the area instead of just around it. With the
Hennepin County Library onsite, it already
possesses community-oriented civic space, which
could be enhanced further if the library was interested in an expanded or renewed presence.
“Without demolishing everything, you
could create a small "main street" on
Pentagon Drive from Kenzie to New
Brighton Boulevard. Reskin the existing
building to better orient to the space
with angle parking on both sides of a
narrow, two lane street.”
TAP Chair Michael Fischer, LHB, Inc.
minnesota.uli.org 7
The right of way that today serves mostly as an alley behind the shopping center could in the future be
linked with the small stretch of trail that currently lies behind the office condo site, creating a north-south
route through the district and connecting it to the residential neighborhoods to the south.
• Consider what the ideal commercial identity of the area will be in the future
Proximity to Rosedale Center, St. Anthony’s own Silver Lake Village, and The Quarry means that many
well-known national brands are already easily accessible from the Gateway South District. Will this area
compete with those places or will it seek to be different or complementary in some way? Whatever path is
chosen, it’s important to give the area a stronger sense of identity.
If the City and community want it, there may be an opportunity to create a “district” feel at Gateway
South. It could be a local or regional destination for any number of things, from craft brewing to arts and
culture to community dining, or just a haven for small, local businesses as the shopping center seems to
be today. If the City sees value in having a place where these kinds of businesses can survive, it should
plan for that ahead of redevelopment as new commercial structures will generally price out small, local
companies in favor of national brands. Preserving affordability may require City assistance or other policy
action, but it might also enable a more unique experience.
Sketch of Possible Placemaking Changes Discussed Above
The sketch below provides some visual guidance on how placemaking changes might take shape at Gateway
South. This includes how existing rights of way might be enhanced, possible building configurations and
alignments, and suggestions for streetscaping along Kenzie Terrace.
minnesota.uli.org 8
Attracting a retail anchor is the most likely catalyst for commercial redevelopment
With fairly large parcels and great connectivity in an area of growing affluence, the study area has many
desirable characteristics from a merchandising perspective. The key is finding the right partner that can have
the catalytic effect on surrounding properties that the City desires. The panel understands that the site was
home to a grocer a number of years ago, but that business has changed much in the intervening years.
Today’s specialty grocers–those that favor smaller footprints and attract a dedicated clientele–would be an
ideal fit. This could include growing national brands like Fresh Thyme, or it could be something more local and
community oriented like a co-op. Whether a grocer or something else, it is important to find a business that
becomes an immediate amenity to existing nearby residents and that would also benefit from new housing in
the Gateway South District.
Allow City-owned properties to be redeveloped as housing
Multifamily housing is a clear fit for the Gateway South District, and the City has indicated that it is willing to
support density similar to what was developed at Silver Lake Village. After several decades of almost no
apartment development in much of the metro, there is plenty of pent-up demand to absorb units here.
However, the City should anticipate that any multifamily proposal for the site will likely look for city financial
participation in some form regardless of whether it is affordable, mixed-income or market rate. It is unlikely that
the current rent levels achievable here will be high enough to profitably cover the cost of land and expense of
redevelopment. As noted above, it will help the process if the City is clear up front about what kinds of
assistance it will consider.
Perhaps the easiest starting point
is enabling housing to be
developed on land the City already
owns. With the commercial
properties likely on a longer
development horizon, this is the
best chance to get new uses here
in the near future. In particular, the
diamond shaped parcel just to the
southwest of the St. Anthony
Service Station along Kenzie
Terrace and the adjacent smaller,
triangular parcel could combine to
hold 50-60 units of affordable
multifamily housing. New residents
also mean new commercial
demand, which could catalyze
additional redevelopment.
minnesota.uli.org 9
Panel Reaction to City Questions
Question 1
WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE STUDY AREA AND ITS LOCATION
IN THE MARKET PLACE FROM A DEVELOPER'S VIEWPOINT?
The advantages of the study area appear to significantly outweigh the disadvantages. However, some
characteristics of the area could serve as either advantages or disadvantages depending on other
circumstances. As an example, the existing high value of the land, is enough to demonstrate the viability of the
area but may be higher than developers are willing to pay to redevelop it.
ADVANTAGES
• Opportunity to implement a long term vision: Successful development of senior housing nearby and the
relative stability of the existing onsite uses lowers the urgency of pursuing redevelopment for its own sake,
allowing St. Anthony to determine what it really wants and patiently work to make it happen.
• Location: The study area offers great connectivity to job centers in both Minneapolis and Saint Paul as
well as recreational amenities like the Grand Rounds Scenic Byway. It is adjacent to stable, well-
maintained single family home neighborhoods, both in Northeast Minneapolis and St. Anthony’s. Finally,
the study area is located near Roseville, a major retailing draw for the metro while also being near growing
lifestyle and artisanal retailing in Northeast Minneapolis’ craft brewing and arts communities.
• School quality: St. Anthony’s renowned school district ensures high demand for single family housing
which can support turnover of older residents from existing homes who may be looking to remain in the
community if another higher density, low maintenance option is available.
• Relatively high land values: The values of parcels included in the study area are already high and
existing uses are relatively successful. This suggests the area can and would support redevelopment.
• City-owned property. St. Anthony Village owns several parcels in the study area including an already-
successful municipal liquor operation. Ownership of these sites allows St. Anthony to control their destiny,
increasing the likelihood that a long-term vision can be realized.
• Supportive environment for redevelopment. St. Anthony has already demonstrated a willingness to
support new development, including residential density. Strong leadership from elected officials and City
staff makes it easier to build relationships that lead to the kinds of projects the city wants.
DISADVANTAGES
• Multiple property owners. The study area includes 22 parcels with 40 property owners, most notably the
office condos in the former motel. This could increase difficulty in assembling sites for redevelopment.
• Proximity to Rosedale. While being fewer than five miles from Rosedale may bode well for housing
demand, it could dampen the success of retail in the study area unless the types of businesses are
significantly different from those found nearby, can be supported locally such as dining and grocery, or
offer unique opportunities for small, locally owned businesses like those onsite today.
minnesota.uli.org 10
• Land value and the success of existing retail. The relative success of the existing shopping centers and
the price of the underlying land may deter developers because it will likely be expensive to acquire the
parcels. The existing uses are in something of a difficult middle ground–neither wildly successful with the
highest and best land use nor dilapidated and blighted.
• Tax Increment Financing may not be achievable. TIF districts are popular tools for enabling
redevelopment by making it less costly to do so. However, the relative success and stability of the study
area makes it unlikely that existing structures would qualify for a “substandard” finding.
Question 2
WHAT KINDS AND LEVEL OF SUPPORT WILL PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPERS ANTICIPATE FROM
THE CITY FOR A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE STUDY AREA?
• Financial: The city should anticipate requests for financial participation for any multifamily proposal
whether affordable, mixed income or market rate due to land prices
and redevelopment costs. Very few submarkets in the metro area can
support market rate development outright because rents are not high
enough to cover redevelopment costs. As outlined above in the
“disadvantages” section, a TIF finding of “substandard” for the existing
commercial structures is unlikely. However, a TIF housing district may
be possible. Tax abatement for desirable proposals should also be
considered. City-owned land provided to developers for low or no cost
can also constitute a form of financial contribution.
• Policy. Beyond financial support, the city can help facilitate development through policy. Assisting with
land assembly by acquiring parcels as they become available, creating an efficient redevelopment process,
and changing land use regulations that conform with desired city uses ahead of time will entice developers.
• Vision and leadership. The panel anticipates that the bulk of redevelopment may still be years away,
owing to the stability of the existing commercial structures and businesses. Engaging with the community
ahead of time and creating a clear vision of what the Gateway South District will help developers see
where and how they can plug into that vision. It also helps with buy-in from residents by giving them the
opportunity to shape the district ahead of time rather than in reaction to specific proposals.
Question 3
WHAT CAN THE CITY DO PROSPECTIVELY TO POSITION THE STUDY AREA FOR
REDEVELOPMENT?
• Create a strong vision that is shared with and supported by the community. Spend time figuring out
what both the City and its residents want, and then promote that vision. Developers will appreciate knowing
what the community wants to see, and having up front agreement about what’s anticipated can reduce
resistance to change from residents.
• Make proactive policy changes and decisions to support the vision where necessary. If zoning or
land use policy changes will be necessary, make them ahead of time if possible. This can help reduce the
complexity of possible projects as they come forward. It is similarly valuable to be upfront with the
development community about what types of financial support the City will consider for projects that
achieve their vision and goals.
“Every market rate
developer is asking for
subsidy unless you're
getting $2/square foot in
rent.”
Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers
minnesota.uli.org 11
• Redevelop existing city-owned properties as housing. St. Anthony is a market ripe for more housing,
and the commercial success of the Gateway South District will be enhanced by its value to nearby
residents, both existing and new. Developing City-owned properties is likely the quickest way to get new
residents into the area.
• Consider purchasing additional parcels as they become available. Simply put, if the City owns a
parcel, it controls that parcel’s destiny. This approach is likely to be most necessary for the office condo
structure where redevelopment seems less likely without a controlling interest in the building’s units. Other
ideal opportunities include the gas station, the parcels on the site’s southwestern edge, and the single
family homes to the south which seem likely to be redeveloped by the existing senior housing developer.
Question 4
ARE PARTICULAR DESIGN ELEMENTS SUCH AS MIXED USE APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA?
• The area needs an identity, placemaking, and an improved public realm. The Gateway South District
today lacks a sense of place and a recognizable identity. The City should do what it can to create
welcoming arrivals to the area, especially at the southwestern corner that serves as the entry point to the
city. It should be more connected to the surrounding
neighborhoods to feel more like a local amenity.
Kenzie Terrace, in particular, seems overbuilt for current traffic
counts and would benefit from a more pedestrian-oriented scale
and design. It should be redesignated and designed as a
neighborhood street rather than a regional road. Narrowed
and/or reduced lanes, fewer curb cuts, wider sidewalks, and
streetscaping would help encourage new pedestrian activity.
This would enable better connections to nearby residential
neighborhoods that stand to be big users of commercial uses in
the area. Street parking along Kenzie could be compatible with
an improved pedestrian experience to help mitigate loss of
public parking that is likely to occur as land uses densify.
The City may have less control over what happens along other
corridors, but to the extent it can influence design decisions in
those places it should look to do so. The intersection
configurations at St. Anthony Blvd are challenging for
pedestrians and the biggest opportunity on Hwy 88 creating connectivity to the Minneapolis Diagonal Trail
bike route for completion of the Grand Rounds as outlined in more detail below.
• Completion of the Grand Rounds “missing link.” The proximity of the Minneapolis Diagonal Trail to the
Gateway South District seems like a logical connection opportunity to resolve the “missing link” in the
Grand Rounds Scenic Byway. This could be routed through some of the existing, underutilized rights of
way in the study area or perhaps along Kenzie Terrace.
• Vertical mixed use is not likely to be feasible. While the panel believes a mix of uses will be successful
in the Gateway South District, it does not view vertical mixed use–i.e. ground floor retail with residential
above–to be likely in this location. Communities often desire vertical mixed use as both an efficient use of
space and aesthetically pleasing, a view the panel largely shares. Unfortunately, it is expensive to build
and difficult to lease outside of areas that have very high levels of pre-existing foot traffic.
minnesota.uli.org 12
Conclusion
The Gateway South District sits at an important entry point into St. Anthony and has the potential to become a
marquee destination for residents and visitors alike. The ULI Minnesota TAP participants were impressed with
its convenient location and desirable attributes for both retail and residential uses. They also especially
appreciate the progressive, proactive approach the City takes towards its development future.
With all the potential that exists at Gateway South, the panel also believes most significant redevelopment is
still probably several years away. The existing St. Anthony Shopping Center appears relatively stable, and
underlying land values are growing. These are generally favorable attributes, but they also drive up the cost of
redevelopment. For these reasons, the panel believes there is value in a patient approach that allows the area
to evolve in response to market forces.
Even if much of the site seems underutilized today, the best actions St. Anthony Village can do right now is
develop a vision for what it could be in the future and make some strategic investments in placemaking to help
catalyze a transformation. Improving the public realm, encouraging better connectivity to adjacent
neighborhoods, developing housing on city-owned land, and finding a marketable identity for Gateway South
will signal to developers that this is a place where they should invest. The panel is bullish on St. Anthony’s
future in general and hopes that this Technical Assistance Panel helps the City realize the full potential of the
Gateway South District.
“The biggest opportunity is to create a vision and a sense of place for the area."
Sarah White, Artspace
81 South 9th Street, Suite 310
Minneapolis, MN 55402
minnesota.uli.org
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Date Type Staff Present
March 14 Work
Session
City Council
City Manager
March 14 Regular Planning Commission Items from February
Public Works Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
Public Works Director
March 28 Work
Session
Code Amendments City Council
City Manager
City Planner
March 28 Regular
Police Annual Report
Wyland Water Challenge
City Council
City Manager
Police Dept
April 11 Work
Session
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
April 11 Regular
Planning Commission Items from March
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Fire Annual Report
Arbor Day Proclamation
Earth Day Proclamation
Quarterly Goals Update
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
April 17
Work
Session
4:30 pm
Tour of City Facilities
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
April 25 Regular Authorize preparation of feasibility study for 2024 street project
Finance Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
May 9 Work
Session
Discuss Debt Levy/Updated Street Improvement Plan City Council
City Manager
May 9 Regular
Planning Commission items from April
Insurance Renewal
Tort Limits - Consent
Finance Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
City Engineer
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
2023
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
May 23 Regular Villager of the Year and Business of the Year City Council
City Manager
June 13 Work
Session 2024 Intitial Property Tax levy Scenairos
City Council
City Manager
June 13 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council
City Manager
July 11 Work
Session Finalize Debt Levy/Updated Street Improvement Plan
City Council
City Manager
July 11 Regular
Planning Commission items from June
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Quarterly Goals Update
Approval of 2024 debt levy-public hearing
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
July 25 Work
Session
City Council
City Manager
July 25 Regular
Liquor Operations Mid Year Report
VillageFest Presentation
Night to Unite Presentation
Night to Unite Proclamation
Approve Union Contracts
City Council
City Manager
Liquor Op Mgr
Police Chief
August 7 Work
Session
Staff proposed 2024 Budget and Levy Presentation
Discuss Updated Levy Scenarios
City Council
City Manager
August 7 Regular
Planning Commission items from July
Spirit of St. Anthony Award City Council
City Manager
August 22 Regular 2024 Proposed Budget & Levy Presentation
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
September 12 Work
Session
Code Amendments
City Council
City Manager
City Planner
September 12 Regular
Planning Commission items from August
2024 Preliminary Operating Budget and Levy-Public Hearing
Students in Leadership-Consent
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
September 26 Regular Fire Prevention Presentation
City Council
City Manager
Fire Dept
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
October 10 Work
Session
2024 Long term capital budget plans City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
October 10 Regular
Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Waste Hauler Accounts-Consent Agenda
Preliminary Certification of Delinquent Utility Accounts-Consent Agenda
Planning Commission items from September
City Council
City Manager
October 24 Work
Session
2024 Water and Sewer Budgets and rate adjustments City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
October 24 Regular
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Quarterly Goals Update
Approval of CIP
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
November 13 Work
Session
Planning Commission Interviews City Council
City Manager
November 14 Regular
Planning Commission items from October
Authorizing polling places for 2023
1st Reading Water, Sewer, & Stormwater-Public Hearing
Presentation on Water and Sewer Rates
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
November 28 Work
Session
General Fund Surplus Transfers
Planning & Parks Commission Interviews
City Council
City Manager
November 28 Regular Fire Prevention Poster Winners
2nd Reading and Adoption Water, Sewer, & Stormwater
City Council
City Manager
December 12 Work
Session
City Council
City Manager
December 12 Regular
Planning Commission items from November
Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs
Setting Salary of City Manager
Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds
Setting the 2024 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy -Public Hearing
2024 Fee Schedule
Quarterly Goals update
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
December 27 Regular
January 09 Work
Session
City Council
City Manager
2024
Date Type Staff Present
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
January 09 Regular
Planning Commission items from December
Housekeeping Resolutions
Resolution for the Street Improvement Bond Reimbursement
Quarterly Donations & Grants
Quarterly Goals update
NYFS Agreement
Outside Orgs-Council
City Council
City Manager
January 23 Regular Public Works Snow Plowing Operations presentation City Council
City Manager
February 13 Work
Session
City Council
City Manager
February 13 Regular
Planning Commission items from January
Water Conservation Poster Winners
Public Hearing-2024 Budget Calendar and Process
2024 Planning Commission Work Plan- (motion only)
2024 Parks and Environmental Commission Work Plan- (motion only)
Administration Annual Report
Liquor License Renewals
City Council
City Manager
Finance Director
February 28 Regular
Metro-Inet Presentation
GreenCorp Member application-resolution
Adoption of Strategic Plan
Liquor Annual Report
City Council
City Manager
Liquor Op Manager
Public Works Director