HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 051320251
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
MAY 13, 2025
I. CALL TO ORDER.
Mayor Wendy Webster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
Mayor Wendy Webster invited the Council and audience to join her in the Pledge of Allegiance.
III. ROLL CALL.
Present: Mayor Webster, Councilmembers Doolan, Elnagdy, Jenson, and Randle.
Absent: None
Also Present: City Manager Charlie Yunker, Assistant City Manager Ashley Morello, City Planner
Steve Grittman, and Fire Chief Izzy Diaz
Others Present: President of St. Anthony Area Chamber of Commerce Cody Holliday, Villager of the
Year Megan MacLeod and Business of the Year Curiouser Foods.
CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE
FOLLOWING ITEMS.
IV. APPROVAL OF MAY 13, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA.
Motion by Councilmember Doolan, seconded by Councilmember Randle, to approve the City
Council Meeting Agenda of May 13, 2025, as presented.
Motion carried 5-0.
V. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS.
A. Villager of the Year.
Mr. Cody Holliday, President of St. Anthony Area Chamber of Commerce, read the
announcement for the Villager of the Year — Megan MacLeod. Mr. Holliday read some of Ms.
MacLeod's accomplishments. Ms. MacLeod thanked the Chamber of Commerce for this honor
and reviewed some of her volunteer activities.
B. Business of the Year.
Mr. Holliday announced the Business of the Year — Curiouser Foods for 2025. He read
background of the business and business owner Trista Soave. Ms. Trista Soave thanked all for
the recognition.
Councilmember Randle congratulated both.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 2
Councilmember Doolan congratulated Trista and stated she loves Curiouser Foods.
Councilmember Doolan stated she and Megan have partnered in many activities.
Councilmember Jenson thanked both for their contributions to St. Anthony.
Councilmember Elnagdy thanked Trista for staying in St. Anthony. She thanked Megan for her
service to St. Anthony.
Mayor Webster thanked Trista for her service and noted that at the work session prior to this
meeting, they had 81h graders sharing their Knowledge to Action Projects. Mayor Webster also
thanked Megan for her great spirit of giving.
VI. CONSENT AGENDA.
A. Approve April 22, 2025, Council Meetins,-, Minutes.
B. License and Permits.
C. Claims.
Motion by Councilmember Elnagdy, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the
Consent Agenda items.
Motion carried 5-0.
VIL PUBLIC HEARING - NONE.
VIII. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF.
A. Resolution 25-037 — Approving a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 34-Unit
Assisted Living Facility as Well as Variances from the Side Yard Setback in an R-4
Zoning District, From Parking Requirements in an R4 Zoning District, and from the
Impervious Surface Maximum in an R4 Zoning District.
City Planner Stephen Grittman reviewed Staff and Planning Commission recommends approval
of Resolution 25-037 based on the following findings and with the conditions as specified in the
Resolution.
The application and modifications made to the original submission were described. The proposed
Resolution encompasses the following applications:
1. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a 34-unit Assisted Living Facility in an R-4
District.
2. Approval of a Variance to the Required side yard setback to the south to 10.5 feet as
shown on the site plan.
3. Approval of a Variance to Parking Requirements (quantity and requirements for
underground) to provide 16 on -site surface parking spaces.
4. Approval of a Variance to the maximum impervious surface standards, increasing
impervious surface to a maximum of 53.8% coverage.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 3
1 Mr. Grittman reviewed the background of this case. The applicant has revised the application
2 following the initial Planning Commission public hearing with a series of modifications to the
3 plans, one of which has resulted in a request for a third variance to accommodate an expansion of
4 the allowable impervious surface on the site to approximately 54.3% beyond the standard
5 allowance of 50% in the R-4, Multi -family Residential zoning district. Plan modifications
6 include the following:
7 • Addition of 5 parking spaces, increasing the supply from 11 to 16 total parking
8 spaces.
9 • Request for a variance to the impervious surface standard as noted above, for the
10 increased parking area.
11 • Modification to the building fagade along the south side, as recommended by staff.
12 • Gable in roofline to break up roof plane.
13 • Addition of stone wainscot to the south and west facades.
14 • Shifting the trash enclosure to the east, and adding a roof cover to screen the view of
15 the trash dumpsters within the enclosure from adjoining residential units.
16 0 Provision of parking supply data from other related projects.
17 • Supplementary shrub planting (in addition to the proposed tree planting) along the
18 north boundary for screening of the parking area above the retaining wall.
19 0 Addition of shrub and perennial grass planting along the south wall of the building.
20
21 Mr. Grittman reviewed the Variance to Impervious surface. Because of the site conditions, the
22 Engineer's office has indicated its support for the variance requested, citing the positive aspects
23 of the civil design, but with additional conditions as follows:
24 1. Demonstrate that water quality and rate control are provided in accordance with City
25 and Rice Creek Watershed District requirements.
26 2. Redesign the biofiltration basin based on final City Engineer requirements.
27 3. Add natural landscaping throughout the site to improve filtration and minimize water
28 usage.
29 4. Add trees to maximize tree cover to help offset the loss of existing tree cover on the
30 site.
31
32 Mr. Grittman reviewed the Land Use. The site is zoned R4, Multi -Family Residential,
33 consisting of 0.86 acres of land. The R4 Zoning District includes multi -family development as
34 a permitted use up to 20 units per acre, and further allows development for senior housing of up
35 to 40 units per acre by Conditional Use Permit. Assisted living facilities qualify as senior
36 housing under the City's land use regulations. The following conditions are required for such
37 housing:
38 1. 75% of parking supply is required to be underground.
39 2. Parking supply totals 1.1 spaces per unit.
40 3. The facility is a collector street, or has alternative transit options arranged for tenants.
41 4. Unit sizes below standard City requirements must identify a transitional plan
42 supporting redesign if the facility changes to a general market facility.
43 5. Density is limited to between 20 and 40 units per acre.
44 6. Additional necessary conditions related to the Comprehensive Plan or local
45 conditions.
46
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 4
1 Mr. Grittman provided comments on each of these conditions. The Site Plan and Setback
2 Variance were reviewed in detail.
3
4 The second variance request relates to the requirement for parking for the facility, and the further
5 requirement that the larger part of the parking is placed below grade.
6
7 1. Parking Supply — There are two issues at play with regard to supply. Under the
8 regular senior multi -family standard, a total of 38 parking spaces would be required,
9 at the 1.1 space per unit minimum. The applicant has provided a revised site plan
10 showing 16 spaces, increased over the original 11 spaces proposed. The applicant
11 contends that this supply will account for employee parking demand of 5 spaces, and
12 at least 10 or more visitor spaces during most days. The applicant has provided
13 additional information on parking supply at comparable projective to support the
14 proposed parking design.
15
16 2. Underground Parking — The code requires, subject to any variance waiver, that most
17 of the on -site parking is provided underground. The applicant is limited to just 16
18 surface spaces in part because impervious surface standards on this small parcel limit
19 further pavement for parking or other purposes, even with a variance of about 10%
20 over the standard/ If the building were elevated to provide an under -building parking
21 story, both parking supply and impervious coverage would be less of an issue.
22
23 Staff believes there may be reasonable grounds for variance consideration in this case, given that
24 the purpose of the underground (or under -building) parking is to limit surface parking and the
25 impervious surface that comes with it. In this case, there would still be a need for some surface
26 parking for visitors and transient employees, even if there were underground spaces available. In
27 this way, the underground requirement can be viewed as an unreasonable burden on the
28 otherwise reasonable use of the property. Staff believes that the 16-space parking supply would
29 be sufficient for nearly all conditions, with an occasional exception for a few high -demand
30 events such as Mother's Day.
31
32 Mr. Grittman reviewed the Building Design and Materials, noting the R4 District requirement:
33
34 The applicant for any multi -family structure in the R-4 District shall provide a proposed
35 materials palette, including a plan that shows brick, stone, glass, and architectural metal
36 on no less than 50% of all building walls. Architecture shall include significant
37 articulation in both wall facades and building roofline.
38
39 The building materials for this structure are primarily lapped metal siding and a wainscot of
40 simulated stone, as well as other stone elements around the main entry facing the parking area
41 and toward the street. The west (street), north, and east exposures show some changes in building
42 wall and roofline. The south wall, adjoining the apartment property and subject to the requested
43 setback variance, shows little articulation. Staff would recommend that this exposure is
44 addressed to add visual interest on this side of the building. This recommendation is strengthened
45 by the fact that this exposure is limited in potential landscape planting due to underground
46 utilities and the narrowed side yard. Enhancing the visual impact of this exposure would help
47 offset the lack of landscape and the setback reduction. The applicant has added cross gables to
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 5
the south roof plane and enhanced the materials on the south and west side of the building with
additional stone wainscot.
Mr. Grittman reviewed Emergency Access, Grading and Drainage, Impervious Surface,
Landscaping and Lighting and noted the landscape plan has been supplemented with additional
foundation plantings along the south building wall. Trees are proposed along much of the north
property line, with newly added shrub and ornamental grass plantings. Additional tree planting
(particularly with upright ornamental small trees, could be added to the south property line and
near the trash enclosure area. A lighting plan has been provided that relies on wall -pack
downlighting on the building's west, north, and east walls. Parking lot pole lighting (at 18 feet) is
shown in two locations, also downcast as required by code. No lighting is proposed for the south
side of the property. The photometric plan shows zero foot-candle intensity at all property lines,
consistent with city code requirements.
A significant portion of the site (more than 25%) is devoted to stormwater management, and
landscaped with trees and natural grasses, and perennials, consistent with the City's natural
landscape code elements. The addition of more natural landscape and tree cover, as
recommended, would add to this feature. Natural landscape cover will reduce the need for
irrigation, and tree cover both reduces heat and helps minimize evaporation of surface moisture.
The applicant has provided a sign location in the front of the building, with a listed size of 34
square feet. This would be consistent with the requirements for such ground signs and will be
reviewed under separate sign permitting.
Mr. Grittman summarized that the Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the
proposed project, including the Conditional Use Permit, Variance for side setback, Variance for
parking, and Variance to the impervious surface maximum. The parking variance is a close
question; however, given the nature of the use, staff supports the variance as requested. These
recommendations come with a set of recommended conditions, which apply both to the CUP and
Variance applications as follows:
1. The applicant maintains a policy that prohibits tenants from storing personal vehicles
on the premises.
2. No conversion of the property to any type of housing that is not specifically
designated for assisted living may occur without a new Conditional Use Permit
demonstrating compliance with all of the terms of the applicable zoning in effect,
including unit count, parking supply, and other factors.
3. The retaining wall is designed by an engineer if it remains more than four feet in
height.
4. The trash enclosure is constructed of materials that match those of the principal
building, including the proposed roof.
5. The applicant constructs the building, with all fagade exposures and roofline, as
proposed, subject to final staff review and approval. The plans as submitted for the
Planning Commission meeting on April 15, 2025, are deemed to meet this condition
as recommended by staff.
6. The applicant works with the City to sign the emergency vehicle lane along Foss
Road for no parking.
7. The City Engineer reviews and approves the grading and drainage plans. Substantive
modifications to the site plan resulting from grading plan changes may result in
additional official review of the proposed plan.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 6
1 8. The City Engineer approves required final designs of the bioretention and other
2 aspects of the stormwater (and other) plans as noted in the Engineer's memo of April
3 3, 2025, and any subsequent Engineer's review.
4 9. The weed -barrier material under the deck is pervious fabric to ensure compliance
5 with impervious surface regulations.
6 10. Additional landscaping plant materials are provided in the rock mulch edge along the
7 south side of the building to help mitigate impacts of the lessened setback in this area.
8 The updated plans reflect compliance with this condition.
9 11. The applicant supplements landscape plans with the recommendations of the City
10 Engineer and as suggested in this report.
11 12. Additional sustainability elements recommended by the Planning Commission and
12 approved by the City Council may be included in any final approval.
13 13. The proposed sign will be reviewed separately and permitted under standard sign
14 permitting procedures.
15 14. The applicant constructs the project consistent with the finally approved plans.
16 15. The applicant enters into a Conditional Use Permit Development Agreement
17 guaranteeing the terms of the permit and operational elements.
18 16. The approval recommendation incorporates the findings of fact and as included in the
19 draft City Council Resolution.
20 17. Any additional recommendations of the City Council.
21
22 Mr. Grittman reviewed the Findings. Also provided for City Council review are the presentation,
23 application materials, and resolution. Alternative Council action include motion to deny the CUP
24 and/or variances. In the event of a recommendation for denial, the City Council must state its
25 findings related to denial on the record. Council may request additional information and table
26 action. A motion to table should be accompanied by the specific information requested of staff or
27 the developer necessary to make a final decision.
28
29 Councilmember Randle asked who currently owns the land, and Mr. Grittman stated Sheldon
30 Mortenson.
31
32 Councilmember Jenson asked if these were all efficiency apartments. Mr. Grittman stated that
33 each of the rooms does not have a full kitchen. Councilmember Jenson asked what if the demand
34 for assisted living goes away and the building is empty with no parking. Mr. Grittman stated that
35 one of the conditions involves changing the use of the site would require a re -application to the
36 City. Councilmember Jenson referred to the setback and the fact that we are trying to squeeze
37 something into a very tight spot. He asked if it could be done without the setback variance. Mr.
38 Grittman stated that the width of the building is standard, and it could not be done without the
39 setback variance.
40
41 Councilmember Elnagdy stated that she is worried that if the assisted living facility is no longer
42 needed, the rents on a 17-unit building would be too high. She referred to the parking and asked
43 where the personal vehicles would be parked. She asked about the access for emergency
44 vehicles. Mr. Grittman stated the space on the street would be sufficient for one vehicle. If there
45 were more responding vehicles, they might block the street temporarily. This allows for good
46 access to the front of the building.
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 7
Councilmember Jenson asked how many parking spaces would be used for emergency vehicles,
and Mr. Grittman stated it would affect 3-4 parking spaces.
Councilmember Doolan asked about the space allotted for emergency services, and it is
sufficient for more than one vehicle to respond. Mr. Grittman stated it would depend on which
vehicles arrived. A smaller vehicle could turn into the parking lot. She asked where the property
line is, as it is difficult to tell where the property lines are. Mr. Grittman based their plan on a
survey of the property, and they are required to build on their property. Councilmember Doolan
stated she appreciates the holding pond and asked if a holding reserve is included. Mr. Grittman
stated that the City Engineer wants final approval of the holding pond.
Mayor Webster asked Mr. Grittman if the Council needs to address each variance. Mr. Grittman
stated that they can be addressed individually.
Councilmember Jenson referred to the map and the access and asked if the fire truck would drive
into the parking lot or would the hose just be pulled from the street. Fire Chief Diaz stated the
emergency vehicles would enter the main entrance on Foss Road to allow access for emergency
vehicles. Fire Chief Diaz is ok with the design.
Councilmember Elnagdy asked about the difference between multi -family housing and senior
housing number of units. Mr. Grittman stated the ordinance was structured for 20 units or more
needing a Conditional Use Permit.
Councilmember Jenson asked about the north side wall that faces the other townhouses and
whether it will be aesthetically pleasing to the neighbors. The applicant has added some brick
and stone on that wall as well as some roof line variations.
Councilmember Doolan stated there is a significant drop from the south end of the property to
the north end and asked if there was an option to have tuck under parking. She has concerns
about the degradation of the foundation due to the pressure of the wall. She questioned the
structural integrity of that transition from the south end to the north end.
Mr. Dave Tibrock, Miller Architects & Builders, stated that the project is a typical current model
of an assisted living unit. It has a congregate dining style. Each room is a living/sleeping room
with a private bathroom. There are common areas, including dining areas, sitting areas, etc. Most
residents like to hang out in the dining room area. There will be a deck for residents to sit on and
look at Mirror Lake. He believes the demand for assisted living will only increase. The applicant
has no intent to convert this building to any other use. On the very bottom elevation (south), the
building will be built into the grade. There would be no structural issues.
Councilmember Randle asked if a meal plan is included in the cost. Mr. Tibrock stated that all
residents would eat together. Councilmember Randle stated there are three other facilities in the
City without 100% occupancy. Mr. Tibrock stated that there are models where each unit would
have small kitchens, but this facility will have meals prepared for them. The applicant has two
other businesses using this model, which are very successful.
Councilmember Jenson asked if this was market rate rentals and Mr. Tibrock stated an elderly
waiver is available for those needing assistance. Some are private pay and some need assistance.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 8
Councilmember Doolan asked if the model is a person needs to live in the facility for a duration
of time before the waiver kicks in. Mr. Tibrock stated the owner will be offering an elderly
waiver as well as other programs.
Mr. Tibrock stated that on the north end of the property, the applicant agreed to add landscaping
to provide screening on the north side.
Councilmember Doolan recognized the Planning Commission for their thorough review of this
project. She asked about having rooftop solar, and that the cost would be prohibitive. She
believes this would be a great location for solar, and she would like the applicant to consider this
along with other sustainability measures. She suggested that Clean Energy Resource Teams be
contacted. Councilmember Doolan asked about reducing waste and composting, and suggested
space be built in to accommodate a future requirement for waste hauling. Mr. Tibrock stated he
does not know what that space would require. She asked when the space is planned, composting
should be considered.
Mayor Webster stated she heard from the neighbors' concerns about the parking lot lights shining
into the bedrooms that face that lot. Mr. Tibrock stated that two lights are proposed and will meet
the City ordinance. This is being addressed to City standards. Mayor Webster asked about the
elderly waiver and asked what the estimated cost would be to residents at this facility and the
estimated wages staff would expect to earn. Mr. Vang stated the average is $20/hour for the
nurse aids. The monthly cost for residents would be $5,000/month, depending on the care needs.
Councilmember Doolan asked if Mr. Vang has all required licensing. Mr. Vang stated there are
very strict requirements and he has all licensing required. Councilmember Doolan asked about
the number of EMS calls received. Mr. Vang stated each current facility has approximately 5
calls to EMS per month.
Councilmember Jenson noted there are 17 conditions that make this project compatible with the
neighborhood.
Councilmember Doolan stated there was a concern raised from the townhome to the north about
their newly completed parking lot. Mr. Grittman stated that the applicants are required to stay on
their own property, and if they cause damage to another's property, they are required to
remediate the damage.
Councilmember Elnagdy stated that there are contractors doing work and damaging property.
Mr. Grittman stated they generally secure the threat to the City's costs.
Councilmember Doolan expressed concern about felling some very large trees. Mr. Grittman
stated they are required to stay on their own property unless they have permission to cross that
line. Mr. Yunker stated there has been no damage to neighboring properties from recent
developments within the City.
Councilmember Elnagdy asked how long construction would take, and Mr. Vang stated
approximately 10 months.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 9
1 Mayor Webster noted that it should be anticipated that an emergency vehicle will visit this
2 facility at least once a week. She asked if a condition could be added that two of the parking
3 spots be reserved for emergency vehicles. Fire Chief Diaz stated he feels comfortable with the
4 plan and does not see the necessity to have reserved parking spots for emergency vehicles. Mr.
5 Tibrock indicated the no -parking area that could be used by emergency vehicles.
6
7 Councilmember Elnagdy asked about the parking situation for the townhomes to the north, and
8 Mr. Grittman stated that their primary parking is in the garages, and there is room for vehicles
9 outside the garages for each unit. Councilmember Ehlagdy asked if it were changed from
0 assisted living to multi -family, who would bear the cost of the changes? Mr. Grittman stated that
1 it would be negotiated between the seller and the new buyer.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Councilmember Doolan believes there are frequent visitors to assisted living facilities, but she
appreciates the research that the applicant has done. There will be 16 parking spaces, and she
questioned if this would be adequate when staff are changing for shifts. The two spots are striped
as no parking to allow for vehicles to turn around. Councilmember Doolan asked about the green
space between the street emergency zone and the building is green space. Mr. Tibrock stated that
it would be where the sign is located.
Motion by Councilmember Jenson, seconded by Councilmember Doolan, to Resolution 25-037 -
Approving a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 34-unit Assisted Living Facility as well
as Variances from the Side Yard Setback in an R4 Zoning District, from Parking Requirements
in an R4 Zoning District, and from the Impervious Surface Maximum in an R4 Zoning District
with 17 conditions noted.
Councilmember Doolan requested to talk through the three variances. She feels comfortable with
the variance for the impervious surface with the BUT being constructed. For the variance for the
setback, she does not feel this is unreasonable. She is challenged with the variance on parking for
the functionality and effectiveness for staff. She believes the conditions are good strategies for
dealing with concerns. She does not care for the idea of putting people onto the street for
parking.
Councilmember Ehiagdy stated that it seems we are trying very hard to make this possible while
not considering if this will be a good experience for the residents and the surrounding homes. It
seems we are setting ourselves up to very narrow margins for how this will work. She also has
issues with parking. She questioned if we are setting ourselves up for failure in the future.
Councilmember Doolan stated that one of the things to think about is that visitors to a facility
such as this are not similar to other multi -family housing. There are no overnight guests. She
would prefer parking could tuck under without spatial problems.
Mayor Webster asked if the reduced parking will be a challenge in the future will be if the
building is converted to something different.
Councilmember Jenson stated that this property has been vacant forever, and we have a chance
to bring it onto the tax roll. There are 17 conditions to make it workable. He feels it is
worthwhile for the Council to approve in general.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 10
Councihnember Doolan stated she appreciates the diligence the Planning Commission took in
reviewing this.
Councihnember Randle left the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
Councihnember Jenson stated he has a brother-in-law who lives in an assisted living facility that
has 50 parking spaces, and only once have they experienced no parking available. There is a lot
of turnover in the parking lot with visitors coming and going.
Mayor Webster stated we do need more housing, and when we think about the needs for our
seniors within the community. She understands the neighbors' concerns about lighting, parking,
etc. She appreciates the flexibility of the applicant to adjust the proposal to better meet the
requests of the City and Planning Commission.
Councihnember Doolan stated that we want to have this facility have the least impact on the
neighborhood. Councilmember Doolan asked about the lighting and recognized that with this
type of facility, there are not a lot of in -and -out visitors at night. She suggested the applicant look
at other types of lighting that are available.
Motion carried 4-0.
Mayor Webster announced there would be a 30-second break.
IX. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL.
A. Hennepin County and Ramsey County Mitigation Plans
Fire Chief Izzy Diaz reviewed in 2007, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal
Disaster Mitigation Act, Ramsey County and its incorporated cities agreed to jointly develop the
Ramsey County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. In 2010, Hennepin County and its
incorporated cities followed suit, forming a similar agreement to develop the Hennepin County
MHMP. Both plans required adoption by the respective County Boards of Commissioners and
the City Councils of all participating municipalities before submission to the Minnesota
Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) for final approval. The City of St. Anthony, which has been
included under both the Hennepin and Ramsey County MHMPs in the past and present, now
seeks to once again participate in and adopt the updated plans to ensure comprehensive
protection for all of its residents. The Plan is intended to serve many purposes, including:
• Enhance Public Awareness and Understanding.
• Create a Decision Tool for Management.
• Promote Compliance with State and Federal Program Requirements.
• Enhance Local Policies for Hazard Mitigation Capability./
• Provide Inter -Jurisdictional Coordination of Mitigation -Related Programming.
Chief Diaz recommends that the City Council approves the adoption of the plans. If
Councihnembers are interested in reviewing the complete plan he can provide.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 11
Councilmember Jenson asked how many years St. Anthony has been participating in this
program, and Chief Diaz stated since 2010. Councilmember Jenson asked if there have been any
significant changes over the years. Mr. Dalton Herding, Hennepin County, stated that as far as
changes to requirements put on the City, nothing significantly has changed in many years.
Mayor Webster recalled hearing about the training that took place near the train tracks and how
possible emergencies would be handled. Residents may be interested in seeing what emergency
management looks like.
Councilmember Doolan stated it is good to do planning and renew the plans. She asked if there
are changes in State and Federal programs and noted this is adequate for the time being. Mr.
Herding stated this plan was completed late last year. The plan is in flux and some changes may
be challenged in the courts. Mr. Herding encouraged the City to adopt these plans.
Motion by Councilmember Elnagdy, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve Resolution
25-038 Adopting the Hennepin County All -Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Motion carried 4-0.
Motion by Councilmember Doolan, seconded by Councilmember Elnagdy, to approve
Resolution 25-039 Adopting the Ramsey County All -Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Motion carried 4-0.
X. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
City Manager Yunker had no report.
Councilmember Doolan stated that on April 29, she attended the 18th Annual Metro CERT
Event. On May 1, she attended the MN Peace Initiative. On May 3, she attended the Grand
Opening at What Up Dough. On May 8, she attended the Hennepin County State of the County
Meeting along with Assistant City Manager Morello. On May 12, she attended the Chamber of
Commerce Board Meeting. She attended an MWMO Board Meeting prior to tonight's Council
Meeting.
Councilmember Jenson stated that on April 23, he attended the Northeast Youth and Family
Services Strategic Planning Meeting and the Metro Cities Annual Meeting. On April 24, he
attended the Annual Chamber of Commerce Meeting. On April 27, he attended the Salo, Finland
Sister City Celebration. On May 8, he attended the Ramsey County Local League of
Governments Climate Action Subcommittee Meeting and another Program Meeting on May 9.
On May 9, he also attended Coffee with the Council with Councilmember Elnagdy. On May 13,
he attended the Chamber Meeting with Councilmember Doolan.
Councilmember Elnagdy stated that on April 27, she attended the Salo Finland 40th Anniversary
Brunch. On May 1, she presented at the Minnesota Law Enforcement Administrative
Professionals Annual Conference in Mankato. On May 9, she attended the Hayden Grove Happy
Hour Connect with the Council.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
May 13, 2025
Page 12
1 Mayor Webster stated that on April 23, she joined Congresswoman Omar at Hayden Grove, and
2 later that day, she met with students on ways they want to contribute to our community. On April
3 24, she attended the Chamber of Commerce Annual Awards Dinner. On April 27, she attended
4 the Sister City Brunch to celebrate a 40-year relationship. On May 3, she attended the grand
5 opening of What Up Dough. On Friday, May 9, she attended she met with two residents about
6 traffic flow and parking ordinances.
7
8 XI. COMMUNITY FORUM.
9
10 A. Public Comment — Rentals.
11
12 An email was received from Mr. Paul White, 3201 32nd Avenue NE, St. Anthony, regarding
13 rentals within the City with recommendations on how the City should proceed when considering
14 rentals.
15
16 XII. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
17
18 A. Future Agenda Items.
19
20 The next Regular Council Meeting will be held on June 10, 2025.
21
22 XIII. ADJOURNMENT.
23
24 The Regular Meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 9:21 p.m.
25
26 Respectfully submitted,
27 Debbie Wolfe
28 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
29
30
31 Gtiv�
32 YOyor
33 ATTEST:
34 City Cle
35 f