Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC WS PACKET 05122026CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE WORK SESSION AGENDA Tuesday, May 12, 2026 at 5:30PM Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person. Minutes Approval Of CC WS Meeting Minutes CC 04 -28 -2026 WS.PDF Work Session Topics Sustainable Building Ordinance Review Steve Grittman, City Planner, presenting. COVER MEMO - SUSTAINABLE BUILDING.PDF SUSTAINABLE BUILDING ORDINANCE DRAFT.PDF Future Work Session Dates, Times And Agenda Items Future Agenda Items FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.PDF Adjournment If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612 -782 -3334 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to promote a high quality of life to those we serve through outstanding city services. 1. A. Documents: 2. A. Documents: 3. A. Documents: 4. 1 City of Saint Anthony CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Minutes APRIL 28, 2026 Present: Mayor & Council: Mayor Wendy Webster, Councilmembers Lona Doolan, Nadia Elnagdy, Thomas Randle, and Jan Jenson Absent: None Staff: City Manager Charlie Yunker, Assistant City Manager Ashley Morello, City Planner Steve Grittman, Ehlers Senior Municipal Advisor Stacie Kvilvang, and Sustainability Coordinator Minette Saulog Others: None Call to Order: Mayor Webster called the Work Session to order at 5:30 p.m. 1.Approval of CC WS Meeting Minutes. A.April 14th, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Motion by Councilmember Doolan, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City Council Work Session Minutes of April 14, 2026, as presented. Motion carried 5-0. 2.Work Session Topics. A.TIF Policy Discussion City Planner Grittman clarified that the Tax Increment Financing Policy is one of three items highlighted during Goal Setting sessions relating to housing policy. He directed the Council to preview the Minnetonka TIF Policy in their packets. Mayor Webster thanked City Planner Grittman for the information. She highlighted that in the past, the City has used TIF for private projects that have incurred extraordinary costs and set projects at a more level market position. Otherwise, TIF is often used to offset City costs necessary to accommodate private development, rather than fund it directly. She provided this information to provide context for past TIF usage and encouraged the Council to use it as a guide to set policies for future TIF use. Councilmember Jenson asked whether there was a need for TIF and whether there would be opportunities to use it in a city that is 98% built out. He stated there are few development opportunities to use TIF in the future, and it may not be wise to spend significant time discussing it. He provided a few examples of large projects completed recently that were accomplished without TIF. He stated that he does not want to subsidize individuals building homes with TIF. Mayor Webster highlighted TIF applications for parcels being redeveloped, such as the gas station site. Councilmember Jenson noted that TIF policy shifts the financial burden from developers to taxpayers. He also indicated that tax 2 April 28, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 2 funding will likely be needed soon to renovate aging City buildings, such as City Hall or the Police Department, and that this may be a more important use of tax dollars than redeveloping small parcels. Councilmember Doolan stated that the conversation will remain important, citing a discussion she had with a Medtronic leader and the Comprehensive Plan, which identifies areas for future redevelopment. She discussed the positive impacts of TIF in the Silver Lake Village project, but noted that some of the added residents shift more financial responsibility to single-family homeowners. Councilmember Doolan indicated that TIF could increase the commercial tax base and address affordability issues. Councilmember Jenson noted that TIF districts typically last about 25 years. Councilmember Elnagdy concurred that shifting the burden to taxpayers must be justified and that prior discussions were not comprehensive enough regarding expectations. She stated that she felt it was important to start the conversation on TIF policy now so that general criteria can be in place if the opportunity to use TIF presents itself, and that specific details could then be clarified. Councilmember Elnagdy expressed that expectations for developers using TIF would have to be very high, possibly higher than those in Minnetonka. Councilmember Randle expressed his historical disdain for TIF usage. He asked whether they could reallocate the current TIF district funds back into the tax levy. He agreed with Councilmember Jenson that there are limited areas for future development in St. Anthony. Mayor Webster noted potential areas for future development, the largest being the shopping center area. He again concurred with Councilmember Jenson and stated that they should use the money to fund City projects that are necessary right now. Mayor Webster informed him that the money is not currently available, but would instead be obtained if TIF were in place by freezing property taxes and using the excess to fund TIF projects. Councilmember Doolan noted that when the TIF district in Silver Lake Village closes, it could bring in additional income. She stated that she believed it would be beneficial to discuss the structure of the Minnetonka policy in relation to their own, even if only for future opportunities. Ehlers Senior Municipal Advisor Kvilvang confirmed that when Silver Lake Village decertifies, there will be new capacity to levy against. She clarified that the Minnetonka TIF policy covers more than affordable housing. Staff is seeking to determine the Council’s preferences for the kinds of developments TIF policy should include. She reminded the Council that even if someone meets the requirements for TIF use, the Council is not required to allow it. City Manager Yunker stated that this topic had been discussed previously, specifically relating to affordable housing. A policy like this can communicate to developers what the City wants. He highlighted that allowing someone to use TIF and writing the policy are two different discussions. Councilmember Randle asked if putting restrictions on developers would discourage them from doing business with the City. City Manager Yunker stated it is difficult to tell, but determining if the market can absorb the City’s goals is important. Councilmember Doolan highlighted that defining objectives and outcomes from TIF is beneficial and could also assist with their Comp Plan for 2050. She noted that TIF could assist the City in meeting goals they are struggling with, such as affordable housing for senior citizens. 3 April 28, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 3 Councilmember Jenson asked how the Council can determine the allowable guidelines and guardrails for TIF use. City Manager Yunker stated that his question is very broad and difficult to answer, but that referencing the Minnetonka guidelines could be beneficial. Councilmember Jenson asked if they could have more examples to use as references. City Manager Yunker confirmed they could, but finding cities comparable to St. Anthony is difficult. Councilmember Jenson asked if Stacy could provide some guidelines. She stated that she would be able to present guidelines that Staff could improve upon, which could provide Council with a better point of reference. Councilmember Doolan indicated that the Met Council and the Comp Plan have good data to identify areas of need. She asked whether a shorter TIF duration could be provided if a project is highly aligned with the City's goals. She stressed the importance of concretely outlining goals for a situation like this. City Manager Yunker proposed that Staff prepare additional information on the TIF policy, and that the Council review it later to determine whether it aligns with the goals they had in mind. Mayor Webster confirmed with the Council that they are interested in outlining a policy, but are unsure of the details at this time, and would like more information. Councilmember Doolan highlighted a few areas of consideration, including local housing needs, development, and affordable housing relative to tax burden, Met Council goals, and feasible strategies for the City. She also highlighted the need to focus on how St. Anthony can utilize County resources, such as the HRA, to reduce the burden on St. Anthony citizens. B.Sustainability Initiatives Discussion Sustainability Coordinator Saulog highlighted the City’s little-to-no-cost progress on the Climate Plan. She informed Council that the goal of today’s discussion is to inform Staff on how to proceed with Climate Plan items that may require incentives and funding, specifically whether Council is open to budgetary funding for these items. She clarified that Staff does not need a line-by-line discussion of options, but is more interested in confirming the Council’s opinion on more permanent budgetary allowances. Assistant City Manager Morello clarified that the main question is whether a section of the budget should be specifically allocated to Climate Plan action. Councilmember Jenson asked if the goal was to set aside funds for City projects or resident projects. Sustainability Coordinator Saulog stated that both are possible and that Staff would appreciate clarification on this moving forward. Councilmember Randle asked again if it was being proposed that funds could be used for personal projects. Mayor Webster clarified that they were seeking the Council’s opinion on this and if a cost- sharing model could be introduced to incentivize residents to follow Climate Plan action items. She provided an example of offering residents who purchased an energy-efficient refrigerator a 20 dollar rebate. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that the Council has already committed to the Climate Plan Action Items and that it could appear hypocritical not to fund them. However, she stated that she prefers keeping the 4 April 28, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 4 initiatives more community-focused and smaller to meet community needs better while also promoting sustainable living. Councilmember Randle expressed concerns about using taxpayer dollars for these incentives. He stated that they need to receive community input before deciding how to use taxpayer dollars, particularly given current concerns about high taxes. Councilmember Doolan appreciated Councilmember Randle’s concerns about the inequity of taxpayer funding usage. However, she noted that there may be ways to incentivize Climate Plan action without the levy's impact. She highlighted investing in items that provide a high return on investment to the City, focusing investment on citizens who are particularly burdened by energy inefficiency, and looking into State and County funding for climate action that they can direct residents to. Councilmember Jenson noted that City buildings and residential buildings should be treated differently, as City buildings are obligated to be maintained, so these must be funded first before the City can assist on the residential side. This could also provide an opportunity to set an example for citizens on why energy efficiency would benefit their own homes. He also highlighted that Councilmember Elnagdy’s idea of prioritizing small actions that individuals can do to increase sustainability could be more realistic. Councilmember Randle expressed his support for using state and County funds but reiterated the need for community input when taxpayer dollars are used. He stated that he believed it was wrong to force individuals to subsidize other residents’ home improvements without their consent, but that he supported the City helping to distribute state or County grant money. Councilmember Doolan stated that the City needs to improve its ability to express why the Climate Plan goals are important. She provided an example of how impervious surface requirements reduce the watershed level and, therefore, lower the tax the City receives for excess watershed. If the City could quantify the profit that incentivizing changes could yield for taxpayers, there may be more support for using taxpayer money to fund these incentives. She asked whether the Council would support funding incentives that could deliver better ROI. Assistant City Manager Morello noted that she was hearing consensus to continue searching for and using grant money, but little support for directly funding incentives. Sustainability Coordinator Saulog highlighted the community support for the INI program. She noted that this is a program that required no financial match from the City, but asked if there would be interest in programs such as the Met Council Water Efficiency program, which requires a 20 percent match from the City. Mayor Webster stated that this is an important question and that she would be much more open to a match. Councilmember Doolan also highlighted that this is an opportunity for higher ROI. Councilmember Jenson also expressed interest in a match program, but noted the need for further discussion of the specifics. Councilmember Elnagdy asked how much it would cost the City to help subsidize programs such as hazardous waste disposal to make the process less expensive and less complicated for residents. 5 April 28, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 5 Councilmember Jenson stated that he attended programs by Hennepin County where you could drop off your hazardous waste, such as paint cans, for free. He asked if programs like this still existed. Mayor Webster noted that Ramsey County also has an environmental center where residents can bring waste for free. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that she would not personally make that trip and that more people would likely properly dispose of their waste if Public Works could bring them from St. Anthony. Councilmember Doolan stated that she believed this was a great proposition and expressed support for more cleanup days. She highlighted the success of similar programming in other cities, but noted that this will cost Public Works time. She proposed asking Colombia Heights and other cities how they fund their programming, and whether grants may exist to support this. She asked how much this would likely cost the City. City Manager Yunker stated it is almost impossible to know, as there is no existing data for St. Anthony to base this on. City Manager Yunker expressed the need for Council to reach a clearer consensus on whether the 2027 Budget should include a line item for Sustainability Programming and, if so, by how much. Assistant City Manager Morello noted Council support for more community-based programming and sought clearer parameters for what the Council would like allocated to this. Councilmember Jenson stated that most hazardous waste is now paint, and most modern paints are water-based or latex-based. If you let them dry, they are safe to throw out. This makes financial incentives for hazardous waste disposal much less necessary. Councilmember Doolan highlighted that the County would still like to receive reusable paint. Councilmember Doolan proposed using City funds recovered from sustainable initiatives to fund future sustainability programming. Mayor Webster asked the Council whether they would like a line item of 20,000 dollars for sustainability issues in the upcoming budget, to give Staff an idea of where to begin. Councilmember Jenson stated that he felt the City should focus first on City building improvements before funding residential projects. Mayor Webster asked him whether he would prefer that this line item be designated specifically for City buildings. Councilmember Jenson confirmed he was looking to focus more on preventing delays in building maintenance. Councilmember Doolan stated the Council must consider criteria for using these funds, the equity around the expenditure, and what they are prioritizing. She specifically proposed focusing on high ROI projects. Councilmember Elnagdy noted that the number was very artificial. Councilmember Jenson concurred, stating he dislikes applying a dollar amount without knowing what it will be used for. Mayor Webster directed City Manager Yunker to inform staff that they would like to set aside funding for sustainability programming, following support from three Councilmembers. City Manager Yunker clarified that this is not a commitment but rather leaves the idea open for Staff to explore. 6 April 28, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 6 C.Franchise Fee Discussion City Manager Yunker summarized Franchise Fees and clarified that they are a tool that cities can use to recoup costs for private utilities, such as airing the City Council meetings on private channels. He highlighted the Council's previous rejection of franchise fees on gas and electricity. He also proposed broadband franchise fees because fiber has largely replaced cable programming, making community programming more difficult. He highlighted that this will place a new tax on the users of these utilities. He asked the Council whether they would like to pursue franchise fees and, if so, whether they would approach it as a way to reduce the tax levy or as an additional source of revenue. Councilmember Randle originally expressed support for broadband fees, but after Mayor Webster clarified that residents, not the company, would be charged, he rescinded his support. Councilmember Jenson noted that in past discussions, these fees were in addition to your property taxes. Councilmember Doolan highlighted that this could be an opportunity to shift the tax burden from homeowners to the full population. Individuals in multi-family complexes would also share the burden of these taxes. Councilmember Jenson asked whether a net analysis could be conducted to show the gain to the City from applying these fees to tax-exempt buildings. City Manager Yunker stated that this would be possible. City Manager Yunker highlighted community complaints about the tax burden on homeowners and confirmed it is the Council’s responsibility to determine if this would be a worthwhile way to shift that burden. Councilmember Doolan proposed implementing fees on natural gas as this could help the City goals on reducing emissions. She noted that gas usage is holding steady, so this presents a better opportunity to increase revenue than electric, which is declining. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that she prefers using franchise fees to shift the tax burden rather than raise additional revenue, and she believed that would be more popular with residents. She also expressed support for funding from exempt properties. Mayor Webster noted that there appeared to be Council support for Staff to explore franchise fees. She asked if the Council supported fees on gas, electric, and broadband. She highlighted that reductions in revenue from lower cable franchise fees resulting from decreased cable usage could be offset by broadband franchise fees. Mayor Webster directed Staff to explore all three options. 3.Future Work Session Dates, Times, and Agenda Items A. Future Agenda Items 4.Adjournment 7 April 28, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 7 Mayor Webster adjourned the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 6:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Samina Crabtree TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 8 MEMORANDUM To:Saint Anthony Village City Council From:Stephen Grittman, City Planner Date:May 12, 2026 Request: Discussion of Sustainable Building Policy/Ordinance BACKGROUND In the spring of 2025, the Parks and Environmental Commission (PEC) met to consider high level parameters of a sustainable building policy. Considering a sustainable building policy for new and remodeled construction projects was listed as an energy focus action item in the City’s Climate Plan. At the work session, staff had shared best practices based on other agencies and requested feedback pertaining to the type of approach, priority impacts to include in the overlay, as well as recommendation on type of applicable projects. The City Council then reviewed the PEC’s recommendations at a work session in the fall of 2025. Council, PEC and staff agreed that a mandatory approach via ordinance was the most effective approach, compared to suggestion or scoring approaches. A mandatory approach establishes a standard best practice with straight forward guidance for developers. The group had consensus that the ordinance should be applicable to new and redevelopments projects impacting multi-family housing, commercial and industrial zones. In addition, many agencies’ sustainable building ordinances or policies include “overlay” criteria, which are essentially criteria specific to the community to capture the City’s priorities or context sensitives. Most recently, the PEC met to review the following staff research, and discuss the merits of a draft ordinance, attached to this memo, and reflecting the comments of the PEC. STAFF RESEARCH Staff had reviewed a number of local agencies’ sustainable building efforts. The Center for Energy and Environment and Hennepin County developed a sustainable building policy guide in 2021, which the City used as a key framework to develop their approach and ordinance. Sustainable Building Policy Basics A policy can include compliance with a third-party rating system (i.e. LEED, B3, etc) to support standardization for sustainable building across the region. These rating systems are well-known in the construction industry and allow developer flexibility to meet policy requirements. A policy can also include specific for a Saint Anthony Village overlay which are specific to the City and typically in addition to the third-party rating system. The City is pursuing a mandatory approach via an ordinance, ensuring compliance from a sustainability standpoint. More standardization helps with competition and cost control. Staff is mindful and heard feedback from the PEC and Council to avoid turning off developers who are considering new/redevelopment in SAV. Staff anticipates that a mandatory approach will result in less confusion as 9 having language in code will be clear for developers to follow, and if it is written into Code. Staff further recommends a mandatory approach for maximum impact, as this relates to city Climate Plan goals for reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Third Party Rating System Best practices recommend the use of a third-party rating system, along with a customized City overlay. This allows the city to customize its policy or ordinance, but provides flexibility for developers in how to meet sustainable building targets City benefits: lessens the need for specialized staff or extensive staff time in verifying project compliance, since third-party systems already use widely accepted sustainability standards. Other benefits: leveraging existing rating systems that are well-known in construction allows easier communication and more cost-effective implementation. Common examples: B3 Guidelines, LEED Staff recommends the City considers utilizing a third-party rating system. This supports standardization in the metropolitan area and state as well as addresses staff time and resources. Staff will research and determine a third-party rating system. City Overlay Criteria It is common practice for cities to identify additional criteria for their policy. The Council may identify criteria to include in their Sustainable Building Policy, in additional to the third-party rating system. Recommended Overlay Criteria -Predicted and actual energy use -Predicted and actual use of potable water -Utilization of renewable energy -EV charging capability (if parking is included) -Diversion of construction waste from landfills and incinerators -Stormwater management -Ongoing monitoring of actual energy and water use (track impacts and ensure compliance) DRAFT ORDINANCE The attached draft ordinance is designed to create a format for the PEC review and comment, based on prior research and discussion at both PEC and City Council levels. The ordinance relies on the direction provided by the PEC and staff, and incorporates elements of several of the local municipalities’ policy documents for its structure. The ordinance consists of four basic components. First is a general purpose statement which is intended to encapsulate the many policy statements and direction that have led to the creation of the ordinance. Next is a listing of those properties that would be subject to the requirements of the ordinance. These include new Multiple Family developments of more than 4 units, expansions of existing multi-family projects of more than four units, renovations of any multi-family projects that require specific zoning approvals (such as Conditional Use Permits or Planned Unit Development). Commercial and Industrial projects are included if they consist of new or expanded floor area of at least 10,000 square feet. The text proposes to exempt existing unaffected building area from the requirements of the code, applying the requirements to the new square footage only. For renovation project, the proposed language relies on valuation, using a threshold value of 50% of the existing value as the point at which a renovation project would be required to incorporate the ordinance standards. Finally, the draft ordinance would require that projects receiving City financial assistance would be held to the standards in the new ordinance. 10 Included in this section is a note that applicants may seek relief by applying for a variance. Since the Sustainable Building Ordinance is a component of the zoning ordinance, the terms of the zoning variance process would apply to this section. The third aspect of the proposed ordinance sets a series of standards that would apply to the buildings identified in the second section. These include a reduction in energy use, a reduction in water use, modifications to incorporate renewable energy sources, compliance with the City’s EV charging requirements, a plan for diversion of construction waste from landfills and incinerators, and improvements that will reduce stormwater runoff from the site. Finally, the fourth section establishes a compliance and monitoring protocol through a third party evaluator. This draft suggests that evaluation would occur at both permit application and one-year stages to measure the impacts of both building compliance and ordinance effectiveness. Other methods may be appropriate in this regard. RECOMMENDATION/COUNCIL ACTION Staff asks the Council to review the draft ordinance to ensure that the proposed ordinance reflects the Council’s priorities. The PEC recommended this draft, modified in a few places to add clarity and ensure consistency with the City’s Climate Plan objectives. NEXT STEPS Subject to Council comment and direction, this draft ordinance would next be reviewed by Planning Commission which would hold a formal public hearing. Following the public hearing, the ordinance would be sent back to City Council for three ordinance readings, which is standard practice based on the City Code. ATTACHMENTS •Draft Ordinance 2026-XX 11 1 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE ORDINANCE 2026-0X AN ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section §154 (Zoning Code) is hereby amended to add the following: 154.70 Sustainable Building Regulations (A) Purpose. St. Anthony Village adopts these requirements in support of its commitment to achieving its goals relating to environmental responsibility, lessening impacts on near-term and long-term environmental quality, and promoting the objectives of its Climate Action Plan and other sustainability initiatives in the areas of Water, Waste, Energy, and Transportation. The standards in this Section are designed to help achieve those goals. (B) This Section applies to all buildings that meet the following threshold elements: (1) Any new Multiple Family Residential or other attached housing project of more than four (4) dwelling units. (2) Any expansion of an existing Multiple Family Residential or other attached housing project which expands the number of dwelling units by more than four (4) units). (3) Any renovation or redevelopment of a Multiple Family Residential or other attached housing project consisting of four (4) or more dwelling units that requires a Conditional Use Permit or Planned Unit Development approval from the City. (4) Any building project in a C-Commercial or LI, Light Industrial zoning district consisting of more than 10,000 square feet of new or expansion square footage. The requirements of this Section shall apply only to the new or expanded portions of the project, and shall not apply to existing portions of the building which are not being modified, except as may apply under Subp. 154.70 (B)(5) of this Section. (5) Any building renovation project in a C, Commercial or LI, Light Industrial zoning district for which the building permit valuation constitutes more than fifty percent (50%) of the County’s total Estimated Market Value for the property in question. (6) Any building project that receives public financial assistance from the City of St. Anthony or its HRA in the form of Tax Increment Financing or other assistance. This clause shall not apply to projects that receive financial assistance from agencies or programs other than the City of St. Anthony, but such projects shall be subject to the other threshold standards 12 2 of this Section as applicable. (7) Applicants for construction projects subject to this Section may seek a zoning variance from any specific requirement of this ordinance per the process and requirements of Section 154.244 of this Code. The City Council, sitting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, shall have the authority to exempt any project from all or some of the requirements of the Section where it finds that the application of the requirements would unduly burden the reasonable construction of a project that otherwise is deemed to meet the goals and objectives of this Section. (C) Standards applicable to all buildings meeting the threshold requirements of this Section: (1) Buildings shall achieve a reduction in energy use of at least __% of existing energy consumption. Applicants shall provide documentation of energy usage over the most recent 12 month period of occupancy, and demonstrate measures to reduce usage by the prescribed amount. Where the building has not been fully occupied, the City and property owner/manager may create an estimate of such usage for purposes of applying this Section. (2) Buildings shall achieve a reduction in water use of at least __% of existing water consumption. Applicants shall provide documentation of water usage over the most recent 12 month period of occupancy, and demonstrate measures to reduce usage by the prescribed amount. Where the building has not been fully occupied, the City and property owner/manager may create an estimate of such usage for purposes of applying this Section. (3) Buildings shall incorporate modifications that provide for utilization of renewable energy sources. Such modifications may include on-site facilities, or subscription to a shared renewable energy program operated by other entities. The City may approve alternative options for renewable energy utilization. (4) Buildings shall incorporate facilities to comply with the City’s current requirements for Electric Vehicle charging in Section 154.179(A)(12). (5) Building construction managers shall provide documentation of plans to divert construction waste and other materials from landfills or incinerators, and shall implement such plans throughout construction. This shall include reuse opportunities and options for deconstruction options, rather than demolition. (6) Building projects shall incorporate additional on-site stormwater management facilities that reduce the quantity of stormwater flowing to off-site storm sewers and ponding areas of no less than ___. Such facilities may include surface or underground infiltration, bio-filtration basins, irrigation water capture/reuse, or other similar facilities to be approved by the City Engineer. 13 3 (D) Compliance and Monitoring. (1) Building owners and/or managers shall subscribe to a third party rating and monitoring system providing Certification through LEED or MN B3 Guidelines. Compliance and Monitoring shall include an evaluation by such third party of each of the requirements of this Section at the time of permit approval, and again at the one year anniversary date of receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy, evaluations to be provided to the City for review. Section 2. Section §xx.xxx is hereby amended to add the following: xx.xx [Title] The city’s ADOPTED BY the City Council of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota this ____ day of _____, 2026. ___________________________________ Mayor Webster ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk AYES: NAYS: 14 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date 2026 May 26 Work Session ADU Ordinance Review City Council City Manager City Planner May 20 May 26 Regular Commissioner McGuire Presentation Water Meter Replacements and Customer Portals Upgrades Liquor Store Renovation Project Update City Council City Manager City Engineer Retail Operations Manager May 20 June 9 Work Session TIF Policy Alternatives City Council City Manager June 3 June 9 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council City Manager June 3 June 23 Work Session City Council City Manager June 17 June 23 Regular City Council City Manager June 17 June 30 Joint Work Session Comprehensive Plan Preliminary Planning City Council City Manager June 24 July 14 Work Session 2027 Initial Property Tax Levy Scenarios City Council City Manager Finance Director July 8 July 14 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Audit Report Quarterly Goals Update Active Transportation Demonstration City Council City Manager Finance Director City Engineer July 8 July 28 Work Session City Council City Manager July 22 July 28 Regular Liquor Operations Mid Year Report VillageFest Presentation Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Public Safety Engagement Presentation City Council City Manager Liquor Op Mgr Police Chief Fire Chief July 22 August 10 Work Session Discuss Updated Levy Scenarios/Detailed General Fund Budget City Council City Manager Finance Director August 4 August 10 Regular Planning Commission items from July City Council City Manager August 4 August 25 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner August 19 August 25 Regular 2027 Proposed Budget & Levy Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director August 19 15 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date September 8 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner September 2 September 8 Regular Planning Commission items from August 2027 Preliminary Operating Budget and Debt Levy-PUBLIC HEARING Students in Leadership-Consent City Council City Manager Finance Director Engineer September 2 September 22 Work Session Existing and Future Community Center Needs Discussion City Council City Manager September 16 September 22 Regular Spirit of St. Anthony Award Fire Prevention Presentation Planning Commission items from August Climate Plan Update Energy Action Plan Update City Council City Manager Fire Dept Sustain. Coord. September 16 October 13 Work Session 2027 Long Term Capital Budget Plalns City Council City Manager October 7 October 13 Regular City Council City Manager October 7 October 27 Work Session 2027 Utility Rates and Budgets City Council City Manager October 21 October 27 Regular Quarterly Donations & Grants Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager October 21 November 10 Work Session Commission Interviews City Council City Manager November 4 November 10 Regular Score Grant Funding Application Approval Canvass Election Results City Council City Manager November 4 November 24 Work Session City Council City Manager November 18 November 24 Regular Fire Poster Contest Winners Approval Plans & Specifications & Order Advertisement for Bids for the upcoming Street Project Fee Schedule Review City Council City Manager Fire Chief City Engineer November 18 December 8 Work Session Goal Setting Preparation City Council City Manager December 2 16 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date December 8 Regular Planning Commission items from November Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs Setting Salary of City Manager Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds Setting the 2027 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy - PUBLIC HEARING 2027 Fee Schedule MS4 Quarterly Goals update Final reading and adoption of water, sewer, & stormwater City Council City Manager Finance Director December 2 December 22 Regular (Typically Cancelled) 2027 January 12 Work Session City Council City Manager January 6 January 12 Regular Planning Commission items from December Housekeeping Resolutions Quarterly Donations & Grants NYFS Agreement Outside Orgs-Council City Council City Manager NYFS January 6 January 26 Work Session 2027 Goals Draft City Council City Manager January 20 January 26 Regular Public Works Snow Plowing Operations presentation City Council City Manager PW Director January 20 February 9 Work Session City Council City Manager February 3 February 9 Regular Planning Commission items from January Public Hearing-2028 Budget Calendar and Process 2027 Planning Commission Work Plan- (motion only) 2027 Parks and Environmental Commission Work Plan- (motion only) Adoption of Strategic Plan City Council City Manager Finance Director February 3 February 23 Work Session Miscellaneous Ordinance Revisions City Council City Manager February 17 February 23 Regular City Council City Manager February 17 March 9 Work Session City Council City Manager March 3 March 9 Regular Planning Commission Items from February Finance Annual Report Public Works Annual Report NineNorth Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director PW Director March 3 March 23 Work Session City Council City Manager March 17 March 23 Regular Fire Annual Report Police Annual Report City Council City Manager Police Dept Fire Dept March 17 April 13 Work Session City Council City Manager April 7 17 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date April 13 Regular Planning Commission Items from March Quarterly Donations & Grants Arbor Day Proclamation Earth Day Proclamation Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager April 7 April 27 Work Session City Council City Manager April 21 April 27 Regular Insurance Renewal & Tort Limits- Consent Villager of the Year and Business of the Year City Council City Manager Finance Director April 21 May 11 Work Session City Council City Manager May 5 May 11 Regular Planning Commission items from April Salo Park Concert Series Presentation City Council City Manager May 5 May 25 Work Session City Council City Manager May 19 May 25 Regular City Insurance Renewal City Council City Manager Finance Director May 19 June 8 Work Session City Council City Manager June 2 June 8 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council City Manager June 2 June 22 Work Session City Council City Manager June 16 June 22 Regular City Council City Manager June 16 July 13 Work Session 2028 Initial Property Tax Levy Scenarios City Council City Manager Finance Director July 7 July 13 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Audit Report Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager Finance Director July 7 July 27 Work Session City Council City Manager July 21 July 27 Regular Liquor Operations Mid Year Report VillageFest Presentation Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Public Safety Engagement Presentation City Council City Manager Liquor Op Mgr Police Chief Fire Chief July 21 August 10 Work Session Discuss Updated Levy Scenarios/Detailed General Fund Budget City Council City Manager Finance Director August 4 August 10 Regular Planning Commission items from July City Council City Manager August 4 18