HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC PACKET 06162026CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, June 16, 2026 at 7:00 PM
Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person.
Call To Order
Roll Call
Approval Of Agenda
Approval Of Minutes
Approval Of PC Meeting Minutes
PC 12 -16 -2025 REG.PDF
PC 03 -17 -2026 REG.PDF
Public Hearing
Sustainable Building Ordinance
Steve Grittman, City Planner, presenting.
COVER MEMO - SUSTAINABLE BUILDING.DOCX
DRAFT ORDINANCE 2026 -XX - SUSTAINABLE BUILDING.DOCX
PH NOTICE - SUSTAINABLE BUILDING.DOCX
PUBLIC COMMENT.PDF
Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
Steve Grittman, City Planner, presenting.
COVER MEMO - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
DRAFT ORDINANCE LANGUAGE - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
DRAFT ORDINANCE 2026 -XX - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
PH NOTICE - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
PUBLIC COMMENT.PDF
General Business
Commission & Staff Reports
Community Forum
Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any City business item not included on
the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and
address on the form at the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk ’s record, and
limit their remarks to three minutes. Generally, the Planning Commission will not take official
action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future
report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. Those unable to attend the
meeting in person may submit comments via the City's PUBLIC COMMENTS FORM.
Information And Announcments
Adjournment
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City
Clerk at 612 -782 -3334 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can
contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our mission is to promote a high quality of life to those we serve through
outstanding city services.
I.
II.
III.
IV.
A.
Documents:
V.
A.
Documents:
B.
Documents:
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGEPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDATuesday, June 16, 2026 at 7:00 PMMembers of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person.Call To OrderRoll CallApproval Of AgendaApproval Of MinutesApproval Of PC Meeting MinutesPC 12 -16 -2025 REG.PDFPC 03 -17 -2026 REG.PDFPublic HearingSustainable Building OrdinanceSteve Grittman, City Planner, presenting.COVER MEMO - SUSTAINABLE BUILDING.DOCXDRAFT ORDINANCE 2026 -XX - SUSTAINABLE BUILDING.DOCXPH NOTICE - SUSTAINABLE BUILDING.DOCXPUBLIC COMMENT.PDFAccessory Dwelling Unit OrdinanceSteve Grittman, City Planner, presenting.COVER MEMO - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
DRAFT ORDINANCE LANGUAGE - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
DRAFT ORDINANCE 2026 -XX - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
PH NOTICE - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.PDF
PUBLIC COMMENT.PDF
General Business
Commission & Staff Reports
Community Forum
Individuals may address the Planning Commission about any City business item not included on
the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and
address on the form at the podium, state their name and address for the Clerk ’s record, and
limit their remarks to three minutes. Generally, the Planning Commission will not take official
action on items discussed at this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for a future
report or direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda. Those unable to attend the
meeting in person may submit comments via the City's PUBLIC COMMENTS FORM.
Information And Announcments
Adjournment
If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City
Clerk at 612 -782 -3334 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can
contact us by using 711 Relay.
Our mission is to promote a high quality of life to those we serve through
outstanding city services.
I.II.III.IV.A.Documents:V.A.Documents:B.Documents:
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
3 DECEMBER 16, 2025
4 7:00 p.m.
5
I.6 CALL TO ORDER.
7
8 Chair Socha called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
9
II.10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11
12 Chair Socha invited the Commission and the audience to join her in the Pledge of Allegiance.
13
III.14 ROLL CALL.
15
16 Commissioners Present:Chair Socha, Commissioners Anderson, Corneille, Hark, and Mayne.
17
18 Absent:Commissioners Erickson and Morita.
19
20 Also Present: Assistant City Manager Ashley Morello.
21
22
23 Chair Socha announced that Commissioners Erickson and Morita’s terms are ending on the
24 Planning Commission. She thanked them for their service.
25
IV.26 APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
27
28 No motion made.
29
V.30 APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
31
32 Motion by Commissioner Hark, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to approve the
33 September 16, 2025, Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes as presented.
34
35 Motion carried 5-0.
36
VI.37 PUBLIC HEARING - NONE.
38
VII.39 GENERAL BUSINESS.
40
A.41 2026 Planning Commission Work Plan.
42
43 Ms. Morello reviewed that St. Anthony Village engages in an annual Goal Setting retreat each
44 January. The Goal Setting retreat is an opportunity for the City Council, Staff, and key
45 representatives to develop the City’s annual Strategic Plan, and update the City’s Goals
46 Pyramid. This effort utilizes Work Plans to finalize its Strategic Plan and annual goals. Ms.
47 Morello provided a draft of the Planning Commission 2026 Work Plan, highlighting the
48 expected activities for the Commission.
49
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 16, 2025
Page 2
1 One of the Commission’s primary responsibilities is to review and recommend Council action
2 on land use applications, and as needed, staff-generated proposals for updates to the City’s
3 Code. In 2026, the Commission will also participate in preparing the City for the upcoming
4 2050 Comprehensive Plan update. That project will get underway in full in 2027; however, in
5 2026, the City will identify priorities and expectations for the Plan, and for the consulting
6 assistance to lead the project. The City’s Comprehensive Plan is anticipated for draft
7 completion in mid-2028.
8
9 One item that may become a land use discussion item again in 2026 is the Legislature’s
10 consideration of mandating certain housing or housing-related zoning issues. These issues
11 were discussed broadly in 2024 and 2025, but little consensus emerged. It is expected that the
12 2026 Legislative session will continue its discussions in this regard.
13
14 Ms. Morello requested that the Commission review the draft Work Plan for 2026 and provide
15 comments.
16
17 Commissioner Mayne asked if any of the findings from the active transportation work would
18 come up in 2026. Ms. Morello stated it is too early for that question to be answered, but there
19 is more to come. Commissioner Mayne asked about the process and procedure for getting
20 items on the Planning Commission’s radar. He asked if there was an opportunity to look at
21 other zoning changes. He asked if it is appropriate to consider Silver Lake Rd. to change to
22 possibly mixed use. Ms. Morello stated there will be an opportunity to look at zoning during
23 the Comprehensive Plan process.
24
25 Chair Socha stated she is attending a meeting on Wednesday on behalf of the Commission. It
26 is a public hearing, so anyone can sit and watch. She said every year they discuss the gas
27 station site, a consultant had suggested it become a main corridor. This would be her personal
28 goal. It has been empty for a long time. Ms. Morello stated the City Council was considering
29 utilizing that site for a cannabis retail operation. They later decided that it was not a feasible
30 site. The redevelopment of the gas station’s property will be discussed. The Planning
31 Commission will be kept informed.
32
33 Commissioner Anderson stated she was surprised that affordable housing was not included in
34 the work plan. Ms. Morello stated there will be conversations about that at goal setting.
35
36 Chair Socha stated the 2040 Comprehensive Plan does address affordable housing.
37
38 Commissioner Anderson stated she was happy to see the accessory dwelling units, which are
39 one possible way to add more housing.
40
41 Chair Socha stated that revisions can be added to the work plan. She heard about affordable
42 housing and ideas for the development of a main corridor through rezoning to mixed-use.
43 Commissioner Mayne stated he is very interested in mixed-use zoning to increase the tax
44 base. He feels the conditions are right for that conversation. Chair Socha recalled
45 conversations for the Ruby. She would like to add explore opportunities for mixed-use
46 development and other ways to promote business and commercial within the City. Ms.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 16, 2025
Page 3
1 Morello recommended not including it in the 2026 Work Plan because it will be coming up in
2 2027 with the Comprehensive Plan activities. Ms. Morello stated that affordable housing can
3 be added.
4
5 Commissioner Corneille referred to #1 under Specific Tasks for 2026 and asked for some
6 examples of updates. Ms. Morello stated there is no specific update. He stated he would be
7 interested in hearing more about Commissioner Mayne’s thoughts on the updated corridor.
8
9 Commissioner Mayne stated he is not prepared to expound in detail, but in general, he would
10 envision Silver Lake Road not to have residential on both sides of the street. Other
11 communities that have a main artery have rezoned busy streets like that. Silver Lake Road
12 could have an opportunity for ground-level retail with housing above. This is pursuant to the
13 tax increase. More density needs to be added to the makeup of our tax base.
14
15 Chair Socha stated, as far as affordable housing, add explore affordable housing deliberately
16 and explore options to increase it.
17
18 Commissioner Anderson stated that first-time homeowner assistance for people who work in
19 the community. Chair Socha stated there are a lot of options, including grants, partnerships,
20 easing up aesthetics, etc. At this point, she prefers deliberate exploration of options to increase
21 it. Ms. Morello suggested using “Support affordable housing initiatives.”
22
23 Commissioner Corneille stated he had mentioned to Mr. Grittman the Met Council
24 requirements for the point of sale inspection for water intrusion. This was adopted by the
25 Council. The impact is that the cost of mitigation before the sale of the house will result in the
26 house price increasing. This is an example of impacting the cost of housing in the community.
27 There may be other ways the City could help mitigate that cost increase. Ms. Morello stated
28 that each year the City applies for a Met Council grant to help pay some of those costs.
29 Commissioner Corneille stated there are options to have the cost not be a condition of sale.
30 Ms. Morello stated this would not be appropriate to be included in the Planning Commission
31 Work Plan. Commissioner Corneille stated this would go along with affordable housing.
32
33 Chair Socha stated that it never came before the Planning Commission. Valid points are being
34 raised, but not part of the Planning Commission’s purview. Chair Socha asked Ms. Morello to
35 pass that comment on to the Mayor and Council.
36
37 Commissioner Corneille asked how affordable housing fits within the Planning Commission’s
38 scope. Chair Socha stated that there are a number of zoning regulations that talk about density.
39 There have been a number of joint work sessions where this was discussed. Commissioner
40 Corneille asked if ADUs could be rental properties. Ms. Morello stated the topic would come
41 before the Planning Commission to review the ordinance language.
42
43 Chair Socha stated that the work the Planning Commission does on the Comprehensive Plan
44 is heavily policy-based on zoning and regulation, and land use decisions policy is in mind.
45 The Planning Commission advises when considering policy, and they do not just review
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
December 16, 2025
Page 4
1 Ordinances that someone else proposes. Ms. Morello stated these conversations would likely
2 be discussed during a joint work session.
3
4 Commissioner Corneille asked if the upcoming agenda items were added from the goal-
5 setting activities for the City Council. Ms. Morello stated that goal-setting is one of the
6 drivers. There are a view deliverables.
7
8 Motion by Commissioner Hark, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to approve the 2026
9 Work Plan as revised, adding support and exploring affordable housing initiatives.
10
11 Motion carried 5-0.
12
13 VIII.STAFF REPORTS.
14
15 Ms. Morello recognized Commissioners Erickson and Morita for their service.
16
17 Staff is working on a draft of the Active Transportation Plan to be reviewed in the coming
18 weeks.
19
20 IX.COMMUNITY FORUM - NONE.
21
22 No one appeared to address the Planning Commission.
23
24 X.INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENT - NONE.
25
26 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
27
28 Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Mayne, to adjourn the
29 meeting at 7:45 p.m.
30
31 Motion carried 5-0.
32
33
34 Respectfully submitted,
35 Debbie Wolfe
36 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
3 MARCH 17, 2026
4 7:00 p.m.
5
I.6 CALL TO ORDER.
7
8 Chair Socha called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
9
II.10 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
11
12 Chair Socha invited the Commission and the audience to join her in the Pledge of Allegiance.
13
III.14 ROLL CALL.
15
16 Commissioners Present:Chair Socha, Commissioners Anderson, Christu, and Fleming.
17
18 Absent:Commissioners Corneille, Hark, and Mayne.
19
20 Also Present: Assistant City Manager Ashley Morello, City Planner Steve Grittman,
21 and Code Enforcement Official Richard Sonterre.
22
23
IV.24 APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
25
26 Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Fleming, to approve the
27 March 17, 2026, Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes as presented.
28
29 Motion carried 4-0.
30
V.31 APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
32
33 Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Christu, to approve the
34 February 17, 2026, Planning Commission Work Session Meeting Minutes as presented.
35
36 Motion carried 4-0.
37
VI.38 PUBLIC HEARING.
39
A.40 Misc. Ordinance Revisions.
41
42 Chair Socha opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
43
44 City Planner Grittman reviewed the City Code Updates, noting in the Council packet that the
45 highlighted sections of the ordinance text reflect areas of modification based on Council
46 feedback.
47
48 The sections reviewed included:
49
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2026
Page 2
1 Vision Triangle – The proposed text has been modified to reflect Council observations for
2 measurements along streets or alleys without a curb.
3
4 Commissioner Fleming asked if the 30-foot distance was new, and Mr. Grittman stated that it
5 is not.
6
7 Chair Socha referred to Chapter 154 of the Zoning Code and asked if a business could seek a
8 variance, and Mr. Grittman stated they could. There is no process to request an exception. She
9 referred to Section F, the grandfather clause, and other automatic exemptions. She asked what
10 recognized means in this case. Mr. Grittman stated that it was existing language in the existing
11 code. She suggested the committee look at the recognized government entity.
12
13 Commissioner Christu referred to subsection D and asked if there is a reason vision
14 obstruction has been described as this. The language is broader, and Mr. Grittman stated that
15 the purpose is that there can be other elements in the landscape.
16
17 Administrative Penalties – Councilmembers provided extensive input into the process and
18 requirements for the hearing process. Staff notes that the structure of the ordinance is to
19 provide compliance staff with the opportunity to work with property owners and occupants
20 toward compliance as a first option, consistent with current practice. This section intends to
21 provide a remedy – short of a Zoning misdemeanor (criminal) charge – for those situations
22 where cooperative compliance can not be achieved. Much of the material, particularly the
23 Hearing Procedure section, has been imported from other communities that have adopted this
24 process.
25
26 Commissioner Anderson likes that there is an option for property owners to work this out. She
27 asked if the hearing examiner needs to live in St. Anthony, and Mr. Grittman stated that they
28 do not. She asked about Section 4 and asked about its intent. Mr. Grittman stated that the
29 purpose is that there may be violations that justify the City resorting to the misdemeanor
30 process. She asked if the property owner does not speak English, how is that handled? Ms.
31 Morello stated that other staff members who do not speak the language are utilized, or apps
32 are used to help translate.
33
34 Chair Socha does not feel it is fair to go through the misdemeanor process. We do not want
35 the City officials to appear to be discriminating against a particular resident. Code Official
36 Sonterre noted that, to his knowledge, there has never been a prosecution for a Code violation.
37
38 Commissioner Christu asked when that remedy would be pursued. Mr. Grittman stated the
39 default is to pursue the administrative remedy. A civil abatement suit could occur.
40
41 Commissioner Fleming stated that Section 4 seems out of place in this section. She suggested
42 it be moved to the end of the Code. Mr. Grittman will discuss with the staff whether there is a
43 better place to have this language.
44
45 Chair Socha stated it was the consensus of the Commission to revise the language as
46 discussed. Commissioner Fleming noted that it is not clear how a petition for a hearing should
47
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2026
Page 3
1 be submitted. This should be clarified. Chair Socha referred to the use of the City Clerk
2 Manager. Ms. Morello stated that this will be updated to the City Manager.
3
4 Food Trucks – The City Council requested a carve-out for specific mobile food units
5 (namely, ice cream trucks and lunch trucks) that operate in the City but constitute an
6 alternative type of food truck. The Definition of Mobile Food Units has been appended to add
7 item (3), which allows these types of vehicles to operate outside of the rules that would apply
8 to other food trucks. The definition limits the carve-out to vehicles that move from place to
9 place, are properly licensed under State regulations, serve only prepackaged food, and are no
10 greater than 22 feet, 2 inches in length. Most ice cream trucks are 18 feet or less in length.
11 Lunch trucks most often operate from pick-up truck vehicles, the longest of which are GMC,
12 Ford, and Ram vehicles of 22 feet, 2 inches. The combination of requirements is designed to
13 effectively prohibit common food trucks, which are often 26 feet or more in length, and serve
14 food to order, not prepackaged goods.
15
16 Commissioner Anderson stated she feels this is heavy-handed for the City. This may be
17 hurting an entry point for immigrants, and this is not necessary right now. When it is restricted
18 to just events, this causes gatekeeping. 20-30% of food trucks are owned by immigrants.
19
20 Chair Socha asked if concerns have been brought to the City about food trucks conflicting
21 with restaurants located in the City? Mr. Grittman stated the discussion began a few years ago
22 on how to deal with food trucks. Right now, they are not allowed in the City on the public
23 right-of-way or on private property. Ms. Morello stated that it has been a reported concern
24 within the City. The new code is less restrictive.
25
26 Commissioner Anderson suggested a food truck could operate with the property owner’s
27 permission. This could create a destination.
28
29 Chair Socha suggested that some of the wording be clarified on private events. She asked if
30 the City has a zoning administrator, and Mr. Grittman stated that there is a zoning
31 administrator.
32
33 Impervious Surfaces – This item clarifies the existing definition of impervious surface
34 (found within the definition of “Lot Coverage” in the Zoning Ordinance), specifying that only
35 the property within the legal boundaries of a parcel is utilized for making this calculation.
36 There is often a misunderstanding on the part of property owners that their property (and thus
37 their calculation of impervious surface) extends to the public street curb line.
38
39 Mr. Grittman stated that this is a clarifying amendment that talks about private property only.
40
41 Chair Socha stated the proposal is great. There have been a lot of questions regarding
42 impervious surfaces. The question of impervious pavers has come up often. Mr. Grittman will
43 add to the language.
44
45 Scavengers – As a part of the City Council discussion, concern was raised as to items that
46 residents might place at the curb with a “Free” sign attached. It should be noted that a resident
47
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2026
Page 4
1 who places property at the curb, designating that property as “Free”, such a sign would
2 constitute permission of the property owner for others to help themselves to the property. This
3 activity would be consistent with the proposed language. This amendment removes the City
4 licensing requirement but retains the regulatory requirements for this activity.
5
6 Ms. Morello noted that, to her knowledge, no one has ever inquired about a scavenger license.
7 The consensus of the Commission was to proceed with the proposed changes.
8
9 Rodents – This language closes a missing definition loophole from prior amendments,
10 establishing what animals fall into this class for purposes of housing maintenance and rental
11 housing operations.
12
13 The consensus of the Commission was to proceed with the proposed changes.
14
15 Amusement Devices – The Council’s discussion noted that while this section is being
16 deleted, it has the effect primarily of removing the City’s licensing requirements for such
17 businesses. Those businesses are still allowed in the City’s commercial district as
18 entertainment venues.
19
20 Commissioner Anderson noted that one of the capstone projects to be presented is for an
21 arcade. Mr. Grittman stated that this does not prevent the businesses.
22
23 The consensus of the Commission was to proceed with the proposed changes.
24
25 Sign Removal – 157.29 ENFORCEMENT REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL. All signs greater
26 than six (6) square feet per side and within a Commercial, Light Industrial, Planned Unit
27 Development, Townhomes, or Multiple Dwellings zoning district shall be subject to the
28 requirements of this subsection.
29
30 Chair Socha suggested some clarification on the wording.
31
32 The Planning Commission has held a public hearing to receive comments and
33 recommendations, after which the proposed ordinances would return to the City Council for
34 the first of three readings in consideration of adoption.
35
36 Chair Socha closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m.
37
38 Mr. Sonterre stated that if there is an appeal and the hearing goes your way, you will get the
39 money put down for the hearing cost. Commissioner Fleming stated the language should be
40 reviewed and modified.
41
42 Commissioner Christu noted there are spots in the code where City is not capitalized.
43
44 Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Christu, to approve proposed
45 modifications with revisions to the City Code as discussed.
46
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2026
Page 5
1 Motion carried 4-0.
2
VII.3 GENERAL BUSINESS – NONE.
4
5 VIII.COMMISSION AND STAFF REPORTS.
6
7 Ms. Morello reported that the City Council approved the Active Transportation Plan in
8 February.
9
10 Mr. Grittman stated the legislature is going to be dealing with housing legislation again this
11 Spring. Updates will be provided to the Commission.
12
13 Chair Socha asked for an update on the rental of single-family homes in St. Anthony. Mr.
14 Grittman stated that the City Council adopted regulations limiting the number of rental
15 licenses available within the City for single-family homes. Short-term rentals were restricted,
16 with no new short-term rental licenses and some grandfathering for owners who lived adjacent
17 to the rental property.
18
19 IX.COMMUNITY FORUM - NONE.
20
21 No one appeared to address the Planning Commission.
22
23 X.INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS - NONE.
24
25 XI. ADJOURNMENT.
26
27 Motion by Commissioner Fleming, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to adjourn the
28 meeting at 8:40 p.m.
29
30 Motion carried 4-0.
31
32
33 Respectfully submitted,
34 Debbie Wolfe
35 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
MEMORANDUM
To:Saint Anthony Village Planning Commission
From:Stephen Grittman, City Planner
Date:June 16, 2026
Request: Public Hearing – Review of Proposed Sustainable Building Ordinance
BACKGROUND
As part of the City’s Environmental Responsibility goal, the City has been working to implement the
Climate Action Plan. In the Climate Plan, an identified action item under the Energy focus area is to
“Consider adopting a sustainable building policy for all new and remodeled construction projects”. Last
year, the City began exploring whether a sustainable building policy or ordinance is feasible for the City.
In the spring of 2025, the Parks and Environmental Commission (PEC) met to consider high level
parameters of a sustainable building policy. At the PEC work session, staff shared best practices based
on other agencies and requested feedback pertaining to the type of approach, priority impacts to
consider for the Saint Anthony ordinance, as well as recommendation on type of applicable projects.
The City Council then reviewed the PEC’s recommendations at a work session in the fall of 2025. Council,
PEC and staff agreed that a mandatory approach via ordinance was the most effective approach,
compared to a voluntary approach or approaches that relied on City preference or scoring systems. A
mandatory approach establishes a standard best practice with straight forward guidance for developers.
The Council and staff reached consensus that the ordinance should be applicable to new and
redevelopment projects impacting multi-family housing, commercial and industrial zones.
Many agencies’ sustainable building ordinances or policies include criteria specific to the community to
capture the City’s priorities or context sensitives. These criteria, referred to as Sustainable Standards in
the draft ordinance, creates an expectation that all projects subject to the requirements of the
ordinance, unless specifically exempted, are working towards consistent environmental goals.
In the spring of 2026, the PEC met to review the staff research, and discuss the merits of a draft
ordinance (updated and attached to this memo), and reflecting the comments of the PEC. With the PEC
comments, the City Council considered the material in worksession, and directed the ordinance to the
Planning Commission for a public hearing and Commission recommendation.
STAFF RESEARCH
Staff reviewed a number of local agencies’ sustainable building efforts. The Center for Energy and
Environment and Hennepin County developed a sustainable building policy guide in 2021, which the City
used as a key framework to develop their approach and ordinance.
Sustainable Building Basics
A Sustainable Building structure often includes compliance requirements with an appropriate third-party
rating system (i.e. LEED, B3, etc) to support standardization for sustainable building across the region.
These rating systems are well-known in the construction industry and allow developer flexibility to meet
policy requirements.
Sustainable Building requirements can also include standards that are specific to Saint Anthony Village
and typically in addition to the third-party rating system.
The City is pursuing a mandatory approach via an ordinance, ensuring compliance from a sustainability
standpoint. More standardization helps with competition and cost control. Staff is mindful and heard
feedback from the PEC and Council to help minimize unreasonable expectations for developers who are
considering new or redevelopment in the City. Staff anticipates that a mandatory approach will result in
less confusion as having language in code will be clear for developers to follow. Staff further
recommends a mandatory approach for maximum impact, as this relates to city Climate Plan goals for
reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
Third Party Rating System
As noted above, best practices recommend the use of a third-party rating system, along with a
customized City overlay. This allows the city to customize its policy or ordinance, but provides flexibility
for developers in how to meet sustainable building targets
City benefits: lessens the need for specialized staff or extensive staff time in verifying project
compliance, since third-party systems already use widely accepted sustainability standards and
external verification.
Other benefits: leveraging existing rating systems that are well-known in construction allows
easier communication and more cost-effective implementation.
Common examples: B3 Guidelines, LEED
Recommended Sustainable Building Criteria
Predicted and actual energy use
Predicted and actual indoor and outdoor water consumption
Utilization of renewable energy
EV charging capability (if parking is included)
Diversion of construction waste from landfills and incinerators
Stormwater management
Ongoing monitoring of actual energy and water use (track impacts and ensure compliance)
DRAFT ORDINANCE
The attached draft ordinance is presented to the Planning Commission for review and comments, based
on prior research and discussion at both PEC and City Council levels. The ordinance relies on the
direction previously provided by the PEC and staff and incorporates elements of several other local
municipalities’ policy documents for its structure.
Purpose
The ordinance includes a general-purpose statement which is intended to encapsulate the many policy
statements and direction that have led to the creation of the ordinance.
Building Use and Size Thresholds
The ordinance includes a listing of those properties that would be subject to the requirements of the
ordinance. These include new Multiple Family developments of 5 or more units, expansions of existing
multi-family projects of 5 or more units, renovations of any multi-family projects that require specific
zoning approvals (such as Conditional Use Permits or Planned Unit Development).
Commercial and Industrial projects are included if they consist of new or expanded floor area of at least
10,000 square feet. The text proposes to exempt existing unaffected building area from the
requirements of the code, applying the requirements to the new square footage only. For renovation
projects of either residential or commercial/industrial use, the proposed language relies on valuation,
using a threshold value of 50% of the existing value as the point at which a renovation project would be
required to incorporate the ordinance standards. This standard is chosen as it reflects statutory
limitations on requirements applicable to legal nonconforming structures.
The draft ordinance would require that projects receiving City financial assistance would be held to the
standards in the new ordinance.
Included in this section is a note that applicants may seek relief by applying for a variance. Since the
Sustainable Building Ordinance is a component of the zoning ordinance, the terms of the zoning
variance process would apply to this section.
Third Party Rating System
The next section establishes a requirement to seek building certification through a third-party evaluator
and rating system. Certification levels for the most common rating systems are outlined in the
ordinance, but equivalent substitute rating systems may be considered by the City as time goes on.
Sustainable Standards Criteria
The proposed ordinance sets a series of Sustainable Standards that would apply to the buildings
identified in the building threshold section. These include a reduction in energy use, a reduction in water
use, modifications to incorporate renewable energy sources, compliance with the City’s EV charging
requirements, a plan for diversion of construction waste from landfills and incinerators, and
improvements that will address stormwater runoff from the site.
Compliance and Monitoring
Finally, this draft suggests a protocol for Compliance and Monitoring whereas evaluation by the City
would occur at time of permit application and the one- and two-year anniversaries of the Certificate of
Occupancy. This is intended to measure the impacts of both building compliance and ordinance
effectiveness.
RECOMMENDATION/PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Staff asks the Planning Commission to review the draft ordinance at the upcoming public hearing, and
provide a recommendation to the City Council for its adoption. As noted, the PEC recommended this
approach, with modifications to add clarity and ensure consistency with the City’s Climate Plan
objectives.
NEXT STEPS
Subject to Planning Commission comment and recommendation, this ordinance would next be sent to
City Council for three ordinance readings, which is standard practice based on the City Code.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance 2026-XX
Public Hearing Notice
Public Comment
1
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE
ORDINANCE 2026-0X
AN ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE HEREBY
ORDAINS:
Section 1.Section §154 (Zoning Code) is hereby amended to add the following:
154.70 Sustainable Building Regulations
(A) Purpose. Saint Anthony Village adopts these requirements in support of its
commitment to achieving its goals relating to environmental responsibility,
lessening impacts on near-term and long-term environmental quality, and
promoting the objectives of its Climate Action Plan, Energy Action Plan,
Comprehensive Plan and other sustainability initiatives. Per the objectives in
these and other Plans, the City is working to reduce city-wide CO2 emissions and
city facility CO2 emissions with the recognition that large buildings are a
significant contributor of CO2. The standards in this Section are designed to help
achieve those goals.
(B) This Section applies to all buildings that meet the following threshold
elements:
(1) Any new Multiple Family Residential or other attached housing project
of more than four (4) dwelling units.
(2) Any expansion of an existing Multiple Family Residential or other
attached housing project which expands the number of dwelling units by
more than four (4) units.
(3) Any renovation or redevelopment of a Multiple Family Residential or
other attached housing project consisting of five or more dwelling units
that requires a Conditional Use Permit or Planned Unit Development
approval from the City.
(4) Any building project in a C-Commercial or LI, Light Industrial zoning
district consisting of more than 10,000 square feet of new or expansion
square footage. The requirements of this Section shall apply only to the
new or expanded portions of the project, and shall not apply to existing
portions of the building which are not being modified, except as may
apply under Subp. 154.70 (B)(5) of this Section.
(5) Any building renovation project in a PUD, R-4, Multi-Family, C,
Commercial or LI, Light Industrial zoning district for which the building
permit valuation constitutes more than fifty percent (50%) of the County’s
total Estimated Market Value for the property in question.
(6) Any building project that receives public financial assistance from the
City of Saint Anthony or its HRA in the form of Tax Increment Financing
2
or other assistance. This clause shall not apply to projects that receive
financial assistance from agencies or programs other than the City of Saint
Anthony, but such projects shall be subject to the other threshold standards
of this Section as applicable. Nothing in this Section is intended to
obligate the City to provide any financial assistance to any project.
(7) Applicants for construction projects subject to this Section may seek a
zoning variance from any specific requirement of this ordinance per the
process and requirements of Section 154.244 of this Code.
(C) Third Party Sustainable Building Rating System
(1) Building owners and/or managers shall comply with one of the
following third-party Sustainable Building Rating Systems. Applicable
versions of Sustainable Building Rating System include the most recent or
current iteration of a rating system in existence at the time of development
application.
(a) US Green Building Council LEED Building Design
and Construction (LEED BD+C) or Building Operations and
Maintenance (LEED O+M); Certified, Silver, Gold or Platinum
(b) State of Minnesota B3 Guidelines; Certified Compliant
(c) Equivalent substitute rating systems may be utilized with prior
approval at the discretion of the City.
(D) The following Sustainable Standards reflect City priorities and are applicable
to all buildings meeting the threshold requirements of this Section. Some
standards may already be incorporated in the requirements of a chosen third-party
rating system, and will be addressed as part of the certification process.
(1) Buildings shall achieve a reduction in energy use. The City shall
maintain a list of methods to achieve the reduction required by this
Section. Building owners shall provide certification with LEED, MNB3,
or other third-party rating system acceptable to the City at the time of
construction, and annually for a period of 2 years after issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
(2) Buildings shall achieve a reduction in interior and exterior water
consumption. The City shall maintain a list of methods to achieve the
reduction required by this Section. Building owners shall provide
certification with LEED, MNB3, or other third-party rating system
acceptable to the City at the time of construction, and annually for a period
of 2 years after issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
(3) Buildings shall incorporate modifications that provide for utilization of
renewable energy sources. Such modifications may include on-site
facilities, or subscription to a shared renewable energy program operated
by other entities. The City may approve alternative options for renewable
energy utilization.
3
(4) Buildings shall incorporate facilities to comply with the City’s current
requirements for Electric Vehicle charging in Section 154.179(A)(12).
(5) Building construction managers shall provide documentation of plans
to divert construction waste and other materials from landfills or
incinerators, and shall implement such plans throughout construction. This
shall include reuse opportunities and options for deconstruction options,
rather than demolition. The City Manager or designee shall have the
authority to establish the contents of the plan, and require information as
necessary.
(6) Building projects shall incorporate stormwater management facilities
that comply with the City’s adopted regulations for stormwater, per review
and recommendation of the City Engineer.
(E) Compliance and Monitoring
(1) Compliance and Monitoring shall include an evaluation of compliance
with the requirements of this Section at the time of permit approval, and
again at the one-year and two-year anniversary dates of receipt of a
Certificate of Occupancy. Evaluations are to be provided to the City for
review.
(F) Enforcement. This Section shall be subject to the enforcement and remedies
provisions of Sections §10.20, §10.98, and §10.99 of the City Code.
Section 2.This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage
and publication.
ADOPTED BY the City Council of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota this ____ day of _____,
2026.
___________________________________
Mayor Webster
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
AYES:
NAYS:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
June 16, 2026, 7:00 p.m.
City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, Saint Anthony, MN 55418
Notice is hereby given that the City of Saint Anthony Village Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing to solicit public response to a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment related to the
establishment of regulations for sustainable development and building practices in City Code Section
154.70.
The City Council is expected to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation of the proposed
amendment at their regular meeting on July 28, 2026, pending Commission action.
The Planning Commission agenda and packet item relating to this application will be made available
prior to the meeting online at www.savmn.com.
Ways to Comment:
In Person
The public is welcome to attend in person at the City of Saint Anthony Village City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake
Road, in the Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m.
Written
Written comments may be taken at the Saint Anthony Village City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, Saint
Anthony Village, Minnesota 55418, online at savmn.com (Planning Commission—Comment or Question)
or via email to planner@savmn.com until the date of the public hearing.
Questions?
Questions may be directed to the City Planner at 612-409-6503.
Steve Grittman
City Planner
From:Welcoming Families
To:*SAPlanner
Cc:Charlie Yunker; Ashley Morello; SA City
Subject:Public Hearing Written Comment Regarding Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit and Sustainable Building
Ordinance Amendments
Date:Friday, May 29, 2026 1:43:46 PM
Dear Chair Socha, Vice Chair Anderson, and Members of the Planning Commission:
The Saint Anthony–New Brighton Welcoming All Families Association respectfully submits
the following public written comment for the June 16, 2026, public hearings regarding the
proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance amendments and the proposed
Sustainable Building ordinance amendments.
The Saint Anthony–New Brighton Welcoming All Families Association is a resident-led
community organization comprised of residents of Saint Anthony Village and New Brighton,
Minnesota. The Association supports civic participation, transparent local governance,
community inclusion, and public policies that strengthen family stability, educational
opportunity, housing accessibility, and meaningful engagement in local decision-making.
We appreciate the considerable effort that City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City
Council have devoted to discussions concerning housing, sustainability, redevelopment,
neighborhood character, and long-range planning. These are important issues that will shape
the future character of Saint Anthony Village for decades to come.
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
The Association supports thoughtful discussion regarding Accessory Dwelling Units as a tool
for expanding housing flexibility while preserving the character of existing neighborhoods.
ADUs can serve multiple public purposes. They may provide housing opportunities for aging
parents, adult children, caregivers, persons with disabilities, and residents seeking to age in
place. They may also assist families facing economic challenges while allowing residents to
remain connected to established neighborhoods, schools, faith communities, and support
networks.
For these reasons, we encourage careful consideration of whether the proposed ordinance
appropriately balances neighborhood preservation with housing flexibility.
In particular, we encourage discussion regarding the proposed limitation that permits ADUs
only when incorporated into a principal dwelling or detached garage while prohibiting
freestanding ADUs. While we recognize the City's interest in managing lot coverage,
infrastructure impacts, parking demands, and neighborhood compatibility, we believe it is
appropriate to evaluate whether larger residential parcels may be capable of accommodating
detached cottage-style ADUs or similarly scaled structures under clearly defined standards.
Such consideration would allow policymakers to evaluate housing options across a wider
range of parcel configurations while maintaining appropriate safeguards regarding appearance,
setbacks, occupancy, and infrastructure capacity.
We also encourage continued evaluation of parking requirements, occupancy standards, and
licensing requirements to ensure that the ordinance reflects the realities of modern family
structures, including multigenerational households that are common across many cultural
communities and often contribute to housing stability and informal caregiving networks.
Sustainable Building Regulations
The Association likewise supports the City's interest in promoting environmental stewardship,
responsible development practices, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and long-term
community resilience.
We appreciate the City's effort to establish clear sustainability goals and to encourage
development practices that reduce environmental impacts over time.
At the same time, successful implementation of sustainability policy depends upon
transparency, predictability, and accessibility. Residents, property owners, builders, and small-
scale developers should be able to understand expectations, anticipate compliance
requirements, and identify practical pathways to achieving community goals.
To that end, we encourage continued attention to objective standards, educational resources,
and implementation approaches that are understandable and achievable while still advancing
the City's environmental objectives.
We also support continued consideration of circumstances involving residents rebuilding after
fires, storms, or other unforeseen hardships. Distinguishing between voluntary redevelopment
and involuntary rebuilding may help ensure that sustainability objectives are pursued in a
manner that remains equitable and practical.
Community Impacts and Long-Term Planning
The Association respectfully observes that housing policy and sustainability policy are
ultimately community policies.
Land-use decisions influence who can remain in a community, who can afford to enter a
community, how families care for one another, and how neighborhoods evolve over time.
These decisions affect older adults, young families, persons with disabilities, first-generation
homeowners, immigrant and refugee households, renters seeking pathways to homeownership,
and residents seeking to remain connected to their community as circumstances change.
As Saint Anthony Village continues its broader discussions regarding redevelopment,
sustainability, taxation, infrastructure, housing, and future growth, we encourage policymakers
to consider these proposals within the larger context of community stability, inclusion,
accessibility, and opportunity.
Strong communities are built not only through buildings and infrastructure, but through
policies that support human dignity, family stability, civic participation, and a sense of
belonging for all residents.
We respectfully request that this written comment be included in the public record for both
public hearings and provided to all Planning Commissioners prior to deliberation.
Thank you for your service and consideration of public input.
Respectfully,
Saint Anthony–New Brighton Welcoming All Families Association
Residents of Saint Anthony Village and New Brighton, Minnesota
welcomingfamilies.sanb@gmail.com
MEMORANDUM
To:Saint Anthony Village Planning Commission
From:Stephen Grittman, City Planner
Date:June 16, 2026
Request: Public Hearing – Review of Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
BACKGROUND
As part of the City’s Thriving Village goal, the City has identified an action step for 2026 to consider to
allow Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). ADUs are currently prohibited per Code § 154.176 (C). The
Council’s interest in considering to allow ADUs is to support flexible housing options. The City Council
notes that as expectations for the community’s residential densities continue to rise through the
Metropolitan Council and housing market pressure, the introduction of these units can support meeting
these expectations.
This memorandum forwards draft language for a proposed ordinance amendment incorporating an
allowance for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) on single family parcels. The material is presented in a
tabular format with ordinance text and accompanying staff comment on each section, as well as a more
formal ordinance form – the ordinance language is duplicated, but without the accompanying staff
comments.
ADUs are secondary dwelling units on single family property which are often made available to relatives
of the homeowner as well as other parties interested in seeking rentals of smaller residential units. The
units operate (generally) independently of the owner’s residence on the property, although they may be
attached to, or part of, the principal home. In this draft, the City Council has directed staff to prepare an
ordinance that requires inclusion or attachment of such units into an existing structure on the property
– either the principal home or a detached accessory structure (such as a garage). The intent is to limit
the proliferation of detached structures on the community’s smaller lots.
The Council discussed the option to accommodate freestanding ADU structures, but chose to
incorporate this consideration into the upcoming housing policy discussions that are expected to be
explored as part of the Comprehensive Plan over the next two years.
The ordinance is structures to establish some baseline administrative requirements, and then set a
series of operational requirements. Several of these elements have been subject to review and
comment by other departments relating to public safety and public services. All of the recommended
elements are intended to accommodate the increase in density and affordability, while maintaining the
intent of R-1 residential zoning in the City.
As noted, in preparing the original draft materials, staff coordinated with Fire, Engineering, and Public
Works staff for content and completeness. This draft was then reviewed by the City Council in work
session in May 2026. With adjustments requested by the Council, this ordinance is now forwarded to
the Planning Commission for a public hearing, and the Commission’s recommendation as to adoption.
Following the Commission’s review and recommendation, the ordinance and the Planning Commission’s
comments will be considered as a part of three readings by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning staff recommends approval of the draft ordinance. It is requested that the Commission review
the ordinance, and prepare a recommendation for City Council consideration, including comments and
any additional recommendations of the Commission. As noted above, there are a variety of options that
are likely to be considered as the City engages the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update and the
housing policies and actions that flow from that document.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance Language – Table Form
Draft Ordinance 2026-XX
Public Hearing Notice
Public Comment
Section Text Staff Comments/Notes
§154.007 DEFINITIONS (zoning)
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU). A
secondary dwelling unit, subordinate to the
principal dwelling on the parcel, occupied as a
separate dwelling with its own kitchen,
sanitation (bathroom), and sleeping area,
along with a separate exterior entrance to the
outdoors.
§154.176 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
(I)Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)New Subsection
(1)Purpose and Intent
This Section establishes regulations relating
to the establishment and operation of
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) on
properties occupied by a single family home.
The purpose of these regulations is the
accommodation of additional density in
limited scope, and that are designed and
operated in ways that have the least impacts
on existing single family neighborhoods.
ADUs shall only be permitted on parcels that
meet all other land use regulations applicable
to any particular property, and as expressly
accessory uses, shall not be presumed to be
allowed on any parcel which is not otherwise
in full compliance with all other zoning,
building, fire, and other requirements.
General Information on the
reason and initial factors for
considering ADUs.
(2)Administrative Requirements
(a)ADUs may be located only on parcels
occupied by one single family detached
dwelling in an R-1 or R-1A zoning district.
(b)Any ADU shall be required to be located on a
parcel on which the principal dwelling is
occupied by the owner of the property as the
owner’s homestead. In the event an owner of
property with an ADU sells to a new buyer
who wishes to continue the ADU rental and
tenant, the seller and buyer may request that
Note that when an owner of
property sells and converts the
parcel to a licensed rental unit, a
licensed ADU will need to have
its rental license terminated. If
the new buyer and ADU tenant
wish to retain the status quo, the
the City transfers the ADU license to the new
owner upon sale.
seller and buyer may arrange for
a transfer of the ADU license.
(c)No parcel may contain more than one ADU
per single family detached dwelling.
(d)Any ADU occupied by a renter shall require a
rental license, for which the City shall record
as a second class of single family rental
licenses. ADUs occupied by a relative of the
owner will require an ADU license,
notwithstanding the exemption to rental
licensing for qualified relatives.
The City will monitor total
numbers of ADU rental licenses
as a separate class of license.
(e)An ADU shall not be included in the eligible
number of single family dwelling rental
licenses in the City’s maximum rental license
caps, either for total or neighborhood-level
totals.
ADUs will not be subject to the
overall rental cap – they do not
infringe on the number of homes
available for owner occupancy.
(f)Short-term rentals shall not be allowed to
occupy ADUs.
This regulation furthers the City’s
intent to severely limit STRs,
since new ADUs are not able to
meet the “pre-existing” STR
license requirement in current
code.
(3)Operational Requirements
(a)Structure Requirement. Any ADU shall be
required to be part of, or attached to, an
existing principal dwelling or a detached
structure. No freestanding ADUs, nor any
attachment to or occupancy of any other
accessory building shall be allowed.
This regulation is intended to
limit lot coverage, and further
avoid the propagation of
additional accessory buildings on
the City’s residential parcels.
Staff notes that the current
Accessory Building height
limitation is 15 feet measured to
the average height of the roof,
and 20 feet to the peak.
(b)Utility Connections. An ADU shall be
connected to City sanitary sewer and water
supplies through a connection to the principal
dwelling. No separate connections to City
sewer or water mains shall be permitted.
This limitation avoids double
metering on single family parcels
at the recommendation of City
public works staff.
(c)Public Service Capacity. The City reserves the
right to cap ADU licensing in the event public
services (streets, sanitary sewer, water, parks,
Currently, there are no
limitations to public utility
capacities. Engineering staff
or others) in any area of the City approach the
City’s service capacities.
notes that ADUs function
essentially as additional
bedrooms on single family
homes, rather than full-capacity
dwellings.
(d)Parking. Any licensed ADU must demonstrate
compliance with the City’s existing off-street
parking requirements for the principal
dwelling (2 spaces, at least one of which must
be enclosed), plus one additional off-street
parking space for the ADU.
(e)Floor Area. ADUs shall contain no less than
400 square feet of habitable space, and a
maximum of 600 square feet. Occupancies
shall be limited to no more than 2 adult
occupants of 19 years of age or greater, along
with dependent minor children less than 19
years of age.
All building codes shall apply to the ADU. In
this regard, total occupancy may be no
greater than one person for the first 150
square feet, one person per each additional
100 square feet.
For reference, current code sets
a minimum of 500sf for
“efficiency” units in multi-family
buildings, and 650sf for one-
bedroom apartments. The code
further sets a minimum of 750sf
for 2-story single family homes,
900sf for 1-1/2 story single family
homes, and 1,000sf for 1-story
homes.
The total occupancy citation is
from the State Building Code.
Thus, a 400 square foot dwelling
may house 3 persons (two adults
and one child), and a 600 square
foot dwelling may house 5
persons (2 adults and 3 children).
The current ordinance limits
major accessory buildings to a
maximum area of 1,000 square
feet (a 4-car garage). The Council
may wish to discuss whether this
may be expanded for ADUs, or
retain the 1,000sf maximum.
(f)Accessibility and Egress. ADUs shall be
provided with at least one exterior entrance
from the outside to the living space, and one
additional access to the exterior (door or
window) from any sleeping area in the unit.
Exterior stairs may provide one access from
upper-level units where such stairs are
This clause addresses emergency
escape and access, including an
allowance for an exterior
stairway. It further gives the Fire
Dept. the ability to review and
approve access to ensure safety
constructed of materials and colors similar to
those of the structure to which the stairs are
attached.
The owner of an ADU shall provide and
maintain access to the exterior entrance of
the ADU, including a path at least 4 feet in
width from the street to said entrance. The
path shall be paved or surfaced with paving
or patio stones.
All access routes in this section shall be
maintained and clear of debris, snow, ice, or
other impediments. Fire officials shall have
the authority to review and approve any
proposed access plan prior to occupancy of
the ADU.
both for residents and
emergency personnel.
The “paving or paver/patio
stone” requirement is included to
provide access to emergency
medical personnel, particularly
where a wheeled stretcher needs
to be used.
(g)Addressing. A separate address for the ADU
shall be clearly depicted on the dwelling,
visible from the street, complying with the
requirements of Section 97.10, ADDRESS
NUMBERS REQUIRED ON BUILDINGS.
Staff proposed an address for any
ADU as:
“1234 Apt. A”
(h)Trash Removal. An ADU shall utilize trash and
recyclable bins and storage of the principal
dwelling, and shall not utilize separate
receptables.
This is intended to limit collection
issues on single family properties,
including concerns over
organized collection contracts.
(i)Mailboxes. Mailbox locations for the ADU
shall be mounted adjacent to the existing
principal dwelling mailbox (if mail is delivered
to the door), or attached to an existing post
(if mail is delivered to a curbside mailbox).
This is intended to limit visual
clutter as well as avoid conflicts
with on-street parking, etc.
(j)Utility Boxes. The owner of property seeking
to add an ADU shall make every attempt to
work with private utilities (electric, cable,
fiber, telephone, etc.) to place boxes in a
clustered location with those serving the
principal dwelling, or combine boxes where
possible.
Again, this language is intended
to manage visual clutter, when
possible. It is noted that
regulation of private utilities is
difficult, and this becomes a
suggestion, not a requirement.
ORDINANCE NO. ___
CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SAINT ANTHONY CITY CODE, BY AMENDING
SECTIONS OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY BUILDINGS,
INCLUDING SECTIONS 154.007 AND 154.176, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1.Section §154.007 (DEFINITIONS) is hereby amended to read as follows:
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU). A secondary dwelling unit, subordinate to the
principal dwelling on the parcel, occupied as a separate dwelling with its own kitchen,
sanitation (bathroom), and sleeping area, along with a separate exterior entrance to the
outdoors.
Section 2.Sections §154.176, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, hereby amended to add the
following:
(I)Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
(1)Purpose and Intent.
This Section establishes regulations relating to the establishment and
operation of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) on properties occupied by a
single family home. The purpose of these regulations is the accommodation
of additional density in limited scope, and that are designed and operated in
ways that have the least impacts on existing single family neighborhoods.
ADUs shall only be permitted on parcels that meet all other land use
regulations applicable to any particular property, and as expressly accessory
uses, shall not be presumed to be allowed on any parcel which is not
otherwise in full compliance with all other zoning, building, fire, and other
requirements.
(2)Administrative Requirements.
ADUs may be located only on parcels occupied by one single family detached
dwelling in an R-1 or R-1A zoning district.
(a)ADUs may be located only on parcels occupied by one single family
detached dwelling in an R-1 or R-1A zoning district.
(b)Any ADU shall be required to be located on a parcel on which the
principal dwelling is occupied by the owner of the property as the
ORDINANCE NO. ___
owner’s homestead. In the event an owner of property with an ADU
sells to a new buyer who wishes to continue the ADU rental and
tenant, the seller and buyer may request that the City transfers the
ADU license to the new owner upon sale.
(c)No parcel may contain more than one ADU per single family detached
dwelling.
(d)Any ADU occupied by a renter shall require a rental license, for which
the City shall record as a second class of single family rental licenses.
ADUs occupied by a relative of the owner will require an ADU
license, notwithstanding the exemption to rental licensing for qualified
relatives.
(e)An ADU shall not be included in the eligible number of single family
dwelling rental licenses in the City’s maximum rental license caps,
either for total or neighborhood-level totals.
(f)Short-term rentals shall not be allowed to occupy ADUs.
(3)Operational Requirements.
(a)Structure Requirement. Any ADU shall be required to be part of, or
attached to, an existing principal dwelling or a detached structure. No
freestanding ADUs, nor any attachment to or occupancy of any other
accessory building shall be allowed.
(b)Utility Connections. An ADU shall be connected to City sanitary
sewer and water supplies through a connection to the principal
dwelling. No separate connections to City sewer or water mains shall
be permitted.
(c)Public Service Capacity. The City reserves the right to cap ADU
licensing in the event public services (streets, sanitary sewer, water,
parks, or others) in any area of the City approach the City’s service
capacities.
(d)Parking. Any licensed ADU must demonstrate compliance with the
City’s existing off-street parking requirements for the principal
dwelling (2 spaces, at least one of which must be enclosed), plus one
additional off-street parking space for the ADU.
(e)Floor Area. ADUs shall contain no less than 400 square feet of
habitable space, and a maximum of 600 square feet. Occupancies
shall be limited to no more than 2 adult occupants of 19 years of age or
greater, along with dependent minor children less than 19 years of age.
All building codes shall apply to the ADU. In this regard, total
occupancy may be no greater than one person for the first 150 square
feet, one person per each additional 100 square feet.
(f)Accessibility and Egress. ADUs shall be provided with at least one
exterior entrance from the outside to the living space, and one
ORDINANCE NO. ___
additional access to the exterior (door or window) from any sleeping
area in the unit. Exterior stairs may provide one access from upper-
level units where such stairs are constructed of materials and colors
similar to those of the structure to which the stairs are attached. The
owner of an ADU shall provide and maintain access to the exterior
entrance of the ADU, including a path at least 4 feet in width from the
street to said entrance. The path shall be paved or surfaced with
paving or patio stones. All access routes in this section shall be
maintained and clear of debris, snow, ice, or other impediments. Fire
officials shall have the authority to review and approve any proposed
access plan prior to occupancy of the ADU.
(g)Addressing. A separate address for the ADU shall be clearly depicted
on the dwelling, visible from the street, complying with the
requirements of Section §97.10, ADDRESS NUMBERS REQUIRED
ON BUILDINGS.
(h)Trash Removal. An ADU shall utilize trash and recyclable bins and
storage of the principal dwelling, and shall not utilize separate
receptables.
(i)Mailboxes. Mailbox locations for the ADU shall be mounted adjacent
to the existing principal dwelling mailbox (if mail is delivered to the
door), or attached to an existing post (if mail is delivered to a curbside
mailbox).
(j)Utility Boxes. The owner of property seeking to add an ADU shall
make every attempt to work with private utilities (electric, cable, fiber,
telephone, etc.) to place boxes in a clustered location with those
serving the principal dwelling, or combine boxes where possible.
Section 3.ADOPTED BY the City Council of Saint Anthony Village,
Minnesota this ____ day of _____, 2026.
___________________________________
Mayor Webster
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
AYES:
NAYS:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
June 16, 2026, 7:00 p.m.
City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, Saint Anthony, MN 55418
Notice is hereby given that the City of Saint Anthony Village Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing to solicit public response to a proposal for regulations related to the establishment of Accessory
Dwelling Units (ADUs) in City Code Section 154.07 and 154.176, and related sections.
The City Council is expected to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation of the proposed
amendment at their regular meeting on July 28, 2026, pending Commission action.
The Planning Commission agenda and packet item relating to this application will be made available
prior to the meeting online at www.savmn.com.
Ways to Comment:
In Person
The public is welcome to attend in person at the City of Saint Anthony Village City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake
Road, in the Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m.
Written
Written comments may be taken at the Saint Anthony Village City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road, Saint
Anthony Village, Minnesota 55418, online at savmn.com (Planning Commission—Comment or Question)
or via email to planner@savmn.com until the date of the public hearing.
Questions?
Questions may be directed to the City Planner at 612-409-6503.
Steve Grittman
City Planner
From:Welcoming Families
To:*SAPlanner
Cc:Charlie Yunker; Ashley Morello; SA City
Subject:Public Hearing Written Comment Regarding Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit and Sustainable Building
Ordinance Amendments
Date:Friday, May 29, 2026 1:43:46 PM
Dear Chair Socha, Vice Chair Anderson, and Members of the Planning Commission:
The Saint Anthony–New Brighton Welcoming All Families Association respectfully submits
the following public written comment for the June 16, 2026, public hearings regarding the
proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance amendments and the proposed
Sustainable Building ordinance amendments.
The Saint Anthony–New Brighton Welcoming All Families Association is a resident-led
community organization comprised of residents of Saint Anthony Village and New Brighton,
Minnesota. The Association supports civic participation, transparent local governance,
community inclusion, and public policies that strengthen family stability, educational
opportunity, housing accessibility, and meaningful engagement in local decision-making.
We appreciate the considerable effort that City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City
Council have devoted to discussions concerning housing, sustainability, redevelopment,
neighborhood character, and long-range planning. These are important issues that will shape
the future character of Saint Anthony Village for decades to come.
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
The Association supports thoughtful discussion regarding Accessory Dwelling Units as a tool
for expanding housing flexibility while preserving the character of existing neighborhoods.
ADUs can serve multiple public purposes. They may provide housing opportunities for aging
parents, adult children, caregivers, persons with disabilities, and residents seeking to age in
place. They may also assist families facing economic challenges while allowing residents to
remain connected to established neighborhoods, schools, faith communities, and support
networks.
For these reasons, we encourage careful consideration of whether the proposed ordinance
appropriately balances neighborhood preservation with housing flexibility.
In particular, we encourage discussion regarding the proposed limitation that permits ADUs
only when incorporated into a principal dwelling or detached garage while prohibiting
freestanding ADUs. While we recognize the City's interest in managing lot coverage,
infrastructure impacts, parking demands, and neighborhood compatibility, we believe it is
appropriate to evaluate whether larger residential parcels may be capable of accommodating
detached cottage-style ADUs or similarly scaled structures under clearly defined standards.
Such consideration would allow policymakers to evaluate housing options across a wider
range of parcel configurations while maintaining appropriate safeguards regarding appearance,
setbacks, occupancy, and infrastructure capacity.
We also encourage continued evaluation of parking requirements, occupancy standards, and
licensing requirements to ensure that the ordinance reflects the realities of modern family
structures, including multigenerational households that are common across many cultural
communities and often contribute to housing stability and informal caregiving networks.
Sustainable Building Regulations
The Association likewise supports the City's interest in promoting environmental stewardship,
responsible development practices, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and long-term
community resilience.
We appreciate the City's effort to establish clear sustainability goals and to encourage
development practices that reduce environmental impacts over time.
At the same time, successful implementation of sustainability policy depends upon
transparency, predictability, and accessibility. Residents, property owners, builders, and small-
scale developers should be able to understand expectations, anticipate compliance
requirements, and identify practical pathways to achieving community goals.
To that end, we encourage continued attention to objective standards, educational resources,
and implementation approaches that are understandable and achievable while still advancing
the City's environmental objectives.
We also support continued consideration of circumstances involving residents rebuilding after
fires, storms, or other unforeseen hardships. Distinguishing between voluntary redevelopment
and involuntary rebuilding may help ensure that sustainability objectives are pursued in a
manner that remains equitable and practical.
Community Impacts and Long-Term Planning
The Association respectfully observes that housing policy and sustainability policy are
ultimately community policies.
Land-use decisions influence who can remain in a community, who can afford to enter a
community, how families care for one another, and how neighborhoods evolve over time.
These decisions affect older adults, young families, persons with disabilities, first-generation
homeowners, immigrant and refugee households, renters seeking pathways to homeownership,
and residents seeking to remain connected to their community as circumstances change.
As Saint Anthony Village continues its broader discussions regarding redevelopment,
sustainability, taxation, infrastructure, housing, and future growth, we encourage policymakers
to consider these proposals within the larger context of community stability, inclusion,
accessibility, and opportunity.
Strong communities are built not only through buildings and infrastructure, but through
policies that support human dignity, family stability, civic participation, and a sense of
belonging for all residents.
We respectfully request that this written comment be included in the public record for both
public hearings and provided to all Planning Commissioners prior to deliberation.
Thank you for your service and consideration of public input.
Respectfully,
Saint Anthony–New Brighton Welcoming All Families Association
Residents of Saint Anthony Village and New Brighton, Minnesota
welcomingfamilies.sanb@gmail.com