Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC WS PACKET 05262026CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE WORK SESSION AGENDA Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 5:30PM Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person. Minutes Approval Of CC WS Meeting Minutes CC 05 -12 -2026 WS.PDF Work Session Topics ADU Ordinance Review Steve Grittman, City Planner, presenting. COVER MEMO - ADU ORDINANCE REVIEW.PDF DRAFT ADU ORDINANCE.PDF Future Work Session Dates, Times And Agenda Items Future Agenda Items FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.PDF Adjournment If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612 -782 -3334 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to promote a high quality of life to those we serve through outstanding city services. 1. A. Documents: 2. A. Documents: 3. A. Documents: 4. 1 City of St. Anthony CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Minutes 05/12/2026 Present: Mayor & Council: Mayor Wendy Webster, Councilmembers Lona Doolan, Nadia Elnagdy, Thomas Randle, and Jan Jenson Absent: None Staff: City Manager Charlie Yunker, Assistant City Manager Ashley Morello, and City Planner Steve Grittman Others: None Call to Order: Mayor Webster called the Work Session to order at 5:30 p.m. 1. Approval of CC WS Meeting Minutes. A. April 28th, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Motion by Councilmember Elnagdy, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City Council Work Session Minutes of April 28, 2026, as presented. Motion carried 5-0. 2. Work Session Topics. A. Sustainable Building Ordinance Review City Planner Grittman provided an overview of the proposed Sustainable Building Ordinance developed from earlier Work Session discussion and Parks and Environmental Commission input. Staff have provided several options based on existing models and prior comments, and have incorporated them into the proposed ordinance. The ordinance includes substantive proposals on requirements and thresholds, as well as processes related to applications, such as a third-party review for building permit applicants. City Planner Grittman highlighted that this ordinance applies to the whole community, but that there are specific requirements for different uses, such as residential or industrial. City Planner Grittman stated that he sought general Council reactions to the ordinance and would answer any questions raised. If the ordinance moves forward, Staff will refine it based on feedback and then bring it to the Planning Commission for a Public Hearing. Finally, it will be formally adopted by the Council following the Public Hearing. Mayor Webster clarified that the goals of the Work Session are to review the threshold requirements and to discuss the process requirements for certification. Mayor Webster proposed beginning with the threshold requirements. 2 May 12th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 2 Councilmember Jenson suggested beginning with page one, which overviews where the ordinance will be applied. He asked if they would be interested in discussing whether the Council wants to apply the ordinance to everything on the first page before discussing what will be applied. Councilmember Jenson agreed with items one through five but had reservations about six. This item stated that any building project that receives financial assistance from the City of St. Anthony or HRA in the form of Tax-Increment Financing or other assistance will be subject to the clause. Still, it may not apply to buildings that receive external assistance. He stated that this means that everything will likely require TIF funding. He expressed that he felt this should not be a part of the process. Mayor Webster highlighted the discussion from the previous Work Session on developing a TIF policy and suggested developing it in tandem with this one. Councilmember Jenson stated that these requirements would make compliance expensive and difficult. This will inspire pushback in builders, and he does not feel the Council should allow areas where contractors can push back. Councilmember Doolan noted that she interpreted this item to mean that any builders who apply for TIF will be subject to the ordinance. Councilmember Jenson highlighted that his forces taxpayers to help builders improve their profit margin, and he is not supportive of this. City Planner Grittman confirmed that the City is not implying that all builders will be eligible for TIF. However, if a builder applies for assistance and it is granted, they must comply with the sustainable building ordinance. Councilmember Jenson asked whether builders typically ask for TIF because they know it is an option. City Planner Grittman confirmed that builders typically request assistance immediately to determine whether it is possible. However, their request does not obligate the Council to provide. The goal of this item is to inform builders that if they request City assistance, they must do so knowing they will have to follow these rules. Councilmember Elnagdy confirmed with City Planner Grittman that this item not only includes TIF but also any City assistance. Councilmember Elnagdy expressed her general approval of the ordinance. She raised some concerns about loose language use. Specifically, she cited that any projects receiving financial assistance will be subject to these rules. She provided an example of a small project that could not afford to comply with these rules and questioned whether they would also be obligated to follow them. Councilmember Jenson noted that very small projects may be exempt from these rules under the ordinance. City Planner Grittman confirmed that the goal of the ordinance is to apply these rules to projects consisting of four or more units or more than 10,000 square feet in area, or to projects that renovate a building without an expansion below the 50 percent financial threshold. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that these qualifiers should be added to item six. City Manager Yunker noted that it is unlikely that a project small enough for this to be a concern will not likely qualify for assistance. Mayor Webster proposed adding any building project that is identified in numbers one through five above to clarify item six. 3 May 12th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 3 City Planner Grittman noted that if a threshold is created, it will not relate to items one through five and would likely be a dollar value. Councilmember Elnagdy proposed creating item six as its own building category, with a threshold. Councilmember Jenson concurred with this idea. Councilmember Doolan highlighted the purpose of the threshold conversation: to acknowledge the financial burdens of sustainable building. She questioned why four units and 10,000 square feet are the thresholds, and if this was aimed at differentiating between small and large developers. City Planner Grittman stated that there is no science to the numbers, but it aims to differentiate between small and large projects. These numbers are flexible, and the Council could propose different thresholds. Councilmember Doolan expressed conflicts between environmental friendliness and overly regulating the community. Councilmember Randle asked what the likelihood of a large project is in St. Anthony. He noted that there was only one space for a large project, which is the shopping center. He asked if there were any other opportunities for large projects. Mayor Webster clarified that the language stating that anything with four or more units expands the possibilities for a large project, and would include the gas station site. However, Mayor Webster agreed that the possibility of a large project was low. Councilmember Doolan highlighted long-term goals and noted that other communities are looking to redevelop their commercial industrial districts into residential areas. These changes could prove useful in future developments. Councilmember Jenson also noted the empty parking lot near the Medtronic building as a potential site for a large housing project. Mayor Webster proposed exploring increased density in smaller lots and building fourplexes. She asked the Council if they would like to include fourplexes in this language, or only lots with more than four units. Councilmember Randle suggested utilizing the current language. Councilmember Doolan requested that the Council discuss single-family home teardowns. She stated that this ordinance should apply to projects that tear down a single-family home to build a larger structure. Councilmember Jenson expressed concerns about regulating individuals seeking to improve their homes. Councilmember Doolan clarified that she is not seeking to add remodels to the ordinance, only full teardowns and rebuilds. Councilmember Randle stated that he was concerned about regulating what individuals do with their own homes. Councilmember Jenson agreed that this felt like government overreach. Councilmember Doolan reminded the Council of the City's goal to reduce emissions. She felt that if these rebuilds were not included, the burden would shift to others. Councilmember Jenson provided an example of his own home remodel, adding many energy-efficient appliances. He noted that many residents are likely already interested in these items, and overly regulating their 4 May 12th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 4 decisions may not be beneficial. He proposed increasing education on the importance of sustainability rather than adding additional regulations to personal home redevelopment. Councilmember Elnagdy acknowledged that Councilmember Doolan was not seeking to limit remodels, only when someone is paying the price for an average home in St. Anthony to tear it down and build an entirely new structure where a single-family home once was. Councilmember Randle stated that he felt that it should be their option. Councilmember Elngady expressed that they are not removing the choice to do so, but rather requiring builders to comply with the rules if they choose to rebuild in a way that helps meet City goals. Councilmember Randle perceived this as pushing their agenda on residents. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that that is what all policy initiatives do. Councilmember Doolan noted that it is not only about energy efficiency, but also about waste. She stated that she felt the Council has the right to acknowledge that residents are creating great amounts of waste through these projects and tell them to do so in a responsible manner. Mayor Webster asked if other cities have incorporated teardown policies into sustainable building policies. City Planner Grittman stated that Edina's teardown policy does relate to single-family homes. Assistant City Manager Morello informed the Council that most cities engage in more educational practices when a single-family home teardown begins. Councilmember Randle expressed approval of this option. Councilmember Elnagdy noted concerns surrounding the wording of section B7. This section allows the Council to exempt any project from the requirements if they find that the requirements would be unduly burdensome. She asked whether there are statutory requirements for zoning and sought clarification on whether any project could truly be exempted. City Planner Grittman confirmed that if an individual seeks a variance, they must prove that there are unique circumstances on their property that create difficulties in putting the property to a reasonable use. If this can be done, the builder will be allowed to proceed with a project that varies from the code. City Planner Grittman stated that item seven was simply added to allow flexibility. Councilmember Elnagdy sought clarification on the language defining what constitutes an unduly burdensome act. She stated that she felt that the practical difficulties of language, which are already well defined, should be added here instead, even if it limits flexibility. Councilmember Jenson noted that he does not feel they should write policy that encourages seeking loopholes. Councilmember Doolan asked whether there are purchases that require the owner to change the zoning for the intended use of the new facility. Councilmember Jenson asked Councilmember Doolan to clarify her question. He summarized his interpretation of the question as whether a building owner seeking to improve their facilities must comply with sustainable building practices. Councilmember Doolan stated that she was discussing individuals who are seeking to change the purpose of their property. 5 May 12th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 5 City Planner Grittman noted that this could be added as a requirement for a PUD or a Conditional Use Permit. Adding this to the ordinance as a PUD would be flexible and appropriate. If this were added as a Condition Use Permit, it would have to be included in the coding requirements. He noted that rezoning is more difficult and concerns the land itself rather than the building. The City is not permitted to put conditions on a rezoning request. He highlighted item B5 as addressing this. He noted that, under the current language, if a building project accounts for more than 50 percent of the County Building Evaluation, they are required to meet the sustainable building requirements. Councilmember Doolan confirmed that the sustainable building requirements apply only to new sections of structures being added to the preexisting structure, not to the preexisting structure itself. City Planner Grittman stated that this is correct, but if the entire building is being remodeled, the sustainable building practices do apply. He noted that this does not apply to residential buildings at the moment, but that could be added. Councilmember Doolan acknowledged that this may raise concerns about overregulation, as highlighted by Councilmember Jenson. City Planner Grittman clarified that if expanded to residential, it would likely concern multi-family homes. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that applying these regulations to multi-family residential units makes sense. Mayor Webster asked Councilmember Elnagdy if she is proposing to add renovations to multi- family buildings to item number five. Councilmember Elnagdy confirmed that she is. City Planner Grittman asked if she had an idea for a unit threshold, and she stated she did not. Councilmember Jenson noted that multi-family expansions and renovations are addressed in items two and three. He asked if this adequately addressed the concern. City Planner Grittman stated that this would apply only to the renovation of an existing multi-family structure, not to a building that is being converted to a multi-family unit after previously being used for a different purpose. Councilmember Elnagdy asked what happens to a builder if they fail the compliance and monitoring. Councilmember Jenson proposed discussing the threshold standards in section C. City Planner Grittman clarified that they are seeking to determine compliance percentages, but he has no specific recommendations at this time. He noted it is difficult to measure the changes, as a vacant building cannot be assessed for energy usage. Staff has attempted to add a test to the ordinance to establish a baseline for energy usage. Councilmember Jenson stated that it will be difficult to determine a specific percentage reduction. He proposed that the builder provide information on the energy-efficient materials, equipment, and appliances being installed in the building. He said measuring building requirements is easier than measuring usage. Councilmember Doolan agreed with Councilmember Jenson’s proposal. She proposed providing builders with several sustainable options for their building process, which they must use a 6 May 12th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 6 specified number of. She noted that Edina requested a 50 percent reduction from standard water use for landscaping and believed that would be appropriate to measure in percentages, but that a different metric should be used for other areas. City Planner Grittman stated that when writing code, measurability and specificity are important, and that these may be easier to achieve with percentages. He noted that the goal of this language is to determine if the builders are making a marked improvement from the previous structure. Mayor Webster asked whether Sustainability Coordinator Saulog could explore language that relies on resources builders can refer to for more measurable efficiency. Councilmember Elnagdy asked Mayor Webster to clarify whether she was seeking something similar to the proposed method by Councilmember Doolan, which would provide a list of options to improve the building's sustainability and require the builder to select a specific amount. Mayor Webster confirmed that this was her goal. City Planner Grittman expressed concern that all builders will likely select the cheapest items from the list. Councilmember Doolan stated that this was likely okay as long as the options were effective. Councilmember Doolan appreciated the targets and thresholds, but proposed adding a limit on water use for landscaping. Councilmember Jenson stated that there are already methods for penalizing buildings that use excessive water. Councilmember Doolan acknowledged community complaints about excessive watering of new development lawns. City Manager Yunker highlighted the possibility of landscape water-use limits that could restrict individuals seeking to add green space. City Manager Yunker expressed concerns about natural disasters or unplanned events that require rebuilding under the Sustainable Building Ordinance, leaving individuals unable to rebuild due to the high costs of sustainable building practices. Councilmember Elnagdy proposed adding a clause similar to an “Acts of God” clause that exempts individuals who experience an unforeseen disaster, such as a fire or tornado, from these requirements. Mayor Webster expressed support for requiring individuals who tear down single-family homes to build a new home that complies with sustainable building requirements. She emphasized that these individuals likely have the financial ability to incorporate these items and that sustainable building will save the builder money in the future. However, she also recognized the struggles faced by individuals forced to tear down their homes due to unforeseen circumstances and felt that these homeowners should not be required to comply. Councilmember Randle expressed his disapproval of the requirements for homeowners rebuilding under any circumstances. 7 May 12th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 7 Councilmember Doolan reminded the Council that this ordinance will also need to pass the Planning Commission, where additional concerns regarding personal freedoms in home building may be addressed. Councilmember Jenson questioned how item C5 will be implemented. He expressed concern about additional red tape and costs. Councilmember Doolan highlighted that there is no specific target in this item. City Planner Grittman noted that he was unsure at the moment what the target should be due to idiosyncrasies between buildings. He stated that the builders would be expected to comply with the plan for diverting waste. Councilmember Doolan suggested providing a list of resources for waste diversion and reuse to builders. She highlighted that this would also be beneficial and informative for other community members seeking to remodel their homes, even if they were not required to comply with the Sustainable Building Ordinance. Councilmember Jenson asked who would be responsible for compiling the list of options and resources for waste diversion. City Planner Grittman informed him that there are existing resources that summarize these options, and that this would likely be the responsibility of Sustainability Coordinator Saulog to acquire and distribute. Councilmember Doolan stated that she believed the County already has lists of resources, given its stated goals and requirements for waste reduction. Councilmember Elnagdy asked what would be done if an unsatisfactory plan were provided. City Planner Grittman stated that Staff would likely require the builder to rework the plan, or the builder would attempt to appeal to the City Council. City Manager Yunker noted that permits would likely not be issued until the plan was adequate. Councilmember Elnagdy expressed concern that the lack of clarification would leave the City vulnerable to complaints upon rejection. She proposed adding a line clarifying that plans may be rejected if found inadequate. Councilmember Jenson stated that, regarding item C6, he believed the percentage requirement should be removed; otherwise, the language is acceptable as is. He noted that almost all developments now include some ponding. City Planner Grittman confirmed that stormwater management is required for projects that disturb more than an acre of land. The language in this item attempts to require all projects that meet the thresholds of item B to incorporate stormwater management, even if they disturb less than an acre. Mayor Webster asked if a percentage would be required for item C6. City Planner Grittman stated that he wanted a percentage requirement but would need to consult with the City Engineer first. Councilmember Elnagdy asked what would happen to builders who failed the compliance and monitoring process. City Planner Grittman stated that he believed that a fine would be imposed. 8 May 12th, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 8 Councilmember Jenson questioned whether a fine would be sufficient. City Planner Grittman reminded the Council that if they continue noncompliance, the fine would be repeatedly imposed. Councilmember Jenson stated that the Ruby phase two should be exempted from the requirements, as they already have their PUD in process. Councilmember Doolan stated that she believed they had already approved noncompliance for this project, as the two-year extension did not require the builders to come back with a new PUD. City Planner Grittman concurred with Councilmember Doolan. However, if they returned for another extension, they could require the builders to comply with the Sustainable Building Ordinance. Mayor Webster thanked City Planner Grittman for his time and for answering their questions. 3. Future Work Session Dates, Times, and Agenda Items A. Future Agenda Items 4. Adjournment Mayor Webster adjourned the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 6:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Samina Crabtree TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 9 MEMORANDUM To:Saint Anthony Village City Council From:Stephen Grittman, City Planner Date:May 26, 2026 Request: Review of Draft Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Materials BACKGROUND This memorandum forwards draft language for a proposed ordinance amendment incorporating an allowance for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) on single family parcels. The material is presented in a table format with ordinance text and accompanying staff comments or notes on each section. The draft materials have been reviewed with Fire, Engineering, and Public Works staff for content and completeness. Council discussion is requested to develop a consensus on the various aspects of the proposed code. Any additional direction would be appreciated as we prepare to bring this forward for public hearing and formal consideration. RECOMMENDATION No recommendations are made at this stage. ATTACHMENTS Draft Ordinance Language 10 Section Draft Ordinance Text Staff Notes and Comments §154.007 DEFINITIONS (zoning) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU). A secondary dwelling unit, subordinate to the principal dwelling on the parcel, occupied as a separate dwelling with its own kitchen, sanitation (bathroom), and sleeping area, along with a separate exterior entrance to the outdoors. §154.176 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS (I)Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)New Subsection (1)Purpose and Intent This Section establishes regulations relating to the establishment and operation of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) on properties occupied by a single family home. The purpose of these regulations is the accommodation of additional density in limited scope, and that are designed and operated in ways that have the least impacts on existing single family neighborhoods. ADUs shall only be permitted on parcels that meet all other land use regulations applicable to any particular property, and as expressly accessory uses, shall not be presumed to be allowed on any parcel which is not otherwise in full compliance with all other zoning, building, fire, and other requirements. General Information on the reason and initial factors for considering ADUs. (2)Administrative Requirements (a)ADUs may be located only on parcels occupied by one single family detached dwelling in an R-1 or R-1A zoning district. (b)Any ADU shall be required to be located on a parcel on which either the principal dwelling or the ADU is occupied by the owner of the property as the owner’s homestead. Note that when an owner of property sells and converts the parcel to a licensed rental unit, a licensed ADU will need to have its rental license terminated. (c)No parcel may contain more than one ADU per single family detached dwelling. 11 (d)Any ADU occupied by a renter shall require a rental license, for which the City shall record as a second class of single family rental licenses. The City will monitor total numbers of ADU rental licenses as a separate class of license. (e)An ADU shall not be included in the eligible number of single family dwelling rental licenses in the City’s maximum rental license caps, either for total or neighborhood-level totals. ADUs will not be subject to the overall rental cap – they do not infringe on the number of homes available for owner occupancy. (f)Short-term rentals shall not be allowed to occupy ADUs. This regulation furthers the City’s intent to severely limit STRs, since new ADUs are not able to meet the “pre- existing” STR license requirement in current code. (3)Operational Requirements (a)Structure Requirement. Any ADU shall be required to be part of, or attached to, an existing principal dwelling or a detached garage. No freestanding ADUs, nor any attachment to or occupancy of any other accessory building shall be allowed. This regulation is intended to limit lot coverage, and further avoid the propagation of additional accessory buildings on the City’s residential parcels. Staff notes that the current Accessory Building height limitation is 15 feet measured to the average height of the roof, and 20 feet to the peak. (b)Utility Connections. An ADU shall be connected to City sanitary sewer and water supplies through a connection to the principal dwelling. No separate connections to City sewer or water mains shall be permitted. This limitation avoids double metering on single family parcels at the recommendation of City public works staff. (c)Public Service Capacity. The City reserves the right to cap ADU licensing in the event public services (streets, sanitary sewer, water, parks, or others) in any area of the City approach the City’s service capacities. Currently, there are no limitations to public utility capacities. Engineering staff notes that ADUs function essentially as additional bedrooms on single family homes, rather than full- capacity dwellings. 12 (d)Parking. Any licensed ADU must demonstrate compliance with the City’s existing off-street parking requirements for the principal dwelling (2 spaces, at least one of which must be enclosed), plus one additional off-street parking space for the ADU. (e)Floor Area. ADUs shall contain no less than 400 square feet of habitable space, and a maximum of 600 square feet. Occupancies shall be limited to no more than 2 adult occupants of 19 years of age or greater, along with dependent minor children less than 19 years of age. All building codes shall apply to the ADU. In this regard, total occupancy may be no greater than one person for the first 150 square feet, one person per each additional 100 square feet. For reference, current code sets a minimum of 500sf for “efficiency” units in multi- family buildings, and 650sf for one-bedroom apartments. The code further sets a minimum of 750sf for 2-story single family homes, 900sf for 1-1/2 story single family homes, and 1,000sf for 1-story homes. The total occupancy citation is from the State Building Code. Thus, a 400 square foot dwelling may house 3 persons (two adults and one child), and a 600 square foot dwelling may house 5 persons (2 adults and 3 children). The current ordinance limits major accessory buildings to a maximum area of 1,000 square feet (a 4-car garage). The Council may wish to discuss whether this may be expanded for ADUs, or retain the 1,000sf maximum. (f)Accessibility and Egress. ADUs shall be provided with at least one exterior entrance from the outside to the living space, and one additional access to the exterior (door or window) from any sleeping area in the unit. Exterior stairs may provide one access from upper-level units where such stairs are constructed of materials and colors similar to This clause addresses emergency escape and access, including an allowance for an exterior stairway. It further gives the Fire Dept. the ability to review and approve access to ensure safety both for 13 those of the structure to which the stairs are attached. The owner of an ADU shall provide and maintain access to the exterior entrance of the ADU, including a path at least 4 feet in width from the street to said entrance. The path shall be paved or surfaced with paving or patio stones. All access routes in this section shall be maintained and clear of debris, snow, ice, or other impediments. Fire officials shall have the authority to review and approve any proposed access plan prior to occupancy of the ADU. residents and emergency personnel. The “paving or paver/patio stone” requirement is included to provide access to emergency medical personnel, particularly where a wheeled stretcher needs to be used. (g)Addressing. A separate address for the ADU shall be clearly depicted on the dwelling, visible from the street, complying with the requirements of Sectio 97.10, ADDRESS NUMBERS REQUIRED ON BUILDINGS. Staff proposed an address for any ADU as: “1234 Apt. A” (h)Trash Removal. An ADU shall utilize trash and recyclable bins and storage of the principal dwelling, and shall not utilize separate receptables. This is intended to limit collection issues on single family properties, including concerns over organized collection contracts. (i)Mailboxes. Mailbox locations for the ADU shall be mounted adjacent to the existing principal dwelling mailbox (if mail is delivered to the door), or attached to an existing post (if mail is delivered to a curbside mailbox). This is intended to limit visual clutter as well as avoid conflicts with on-street parking, etc. (j)Utility Boxes. The owner of property seeking to add an ADU shall make every attempt to work with private utilities (electric, cable, fiber, telephone, etc.) to place boxes in a clustered location with those serving the principal dwelling, or combine boxes where possible. Again, this language is intended to manage visual clutter, when possible. It is noted that regulation of private utilities is difficult, and this becomes a suggestion, not a requirement. 14 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date 2026 June 9 Work Session Public Finance Policy Franchise Fees City Council City Manager June 3 June 9 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council City Manager June 3 June 23 Work Session Comprehensive Plan Overview City Council City Manager June 17 June 23 Regular City Council City Manager June 17 June 30 Joint Work Session Comprehensive Plan Preliminary Planning City Council City Manager June 24 July 14 Work Session Sustainable Building Ordinance City Council City Manager City Planner July 8 July 14 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Audit Report Quarterly Goals Update Active Transportation Demonstration City Council City Manager Finance Director City Engineer July 8 July 28 Work Session 2027 Initial Property Tax Levy Scenarios City Council City Manager Finance Director July 22 July 28 Regular Liquor Operations Mid Year Report VillageFest Presentation Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Public Safety Engagement Presentation City Council City Manager Liquor Op Mgr Police Chief Fire Chief July 22 August 10 Work Session Discuss Updated Levy Scenarios/Detailed General Fund Budget City Council City Manager Finance Director August 4 August 10 Regular Planning Commission items from July City Council City Manager August 4 August 25 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner August 19 August 25 Regular 2027 Proposed Budget & Levy Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director August 19 September 8 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner September 2 September 8 Regular Planning Commission items from August 2027 Preliminary Operating Budget and Debt Levy-PUBLIC HEARING Students in Leadership-Consent City Council City Manager Finance Director Engineer September 2 September 22 Work Session Existing and Future Community Center Needs Discussion City Council City Manager September 16 15 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date September 22 Regular Spirit of St. Anthony Award Fire Prevention Presentation Planning Commission items from August Climate Plan Update Energy Action Plan Update City Council City Manager Fire Dept Sustain. Coord. September 16 October 13 Work Session 2027 Long Term Capital Budget Plalns City Council City Manager October 7 October 13 Regular City Council City Manager October 7 October 27 Work Session 2027 Utility Rates and Budgets City Council City Manager October 21 October 27 Regular Quarterly Donations & Grants Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager October 21 November 10 Work Session Commission Interviews City Council City Manager November 4 November 10 Regular Score Grant Funding Application Approval Canvass Election Results City Council City Manager November 4 November 24 Work Session City Council City Manager November 18 November 24 Regular Fire Poster Contest Winners Approval Plans & Specifications & Order Advertisement for Bids for the upcoming Street Project Fee Schedule Review City Council City Manager Fire Chief City Engineer November 18 December 8 Work Session Goal Setting Preparation City Council City Manager December 2 December 8 Regular Planning Commission items from November Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs Setting Salary of City Manager Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds Setting the 2027 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy - PUBLIC HEARING 2027 Fee Schedule MS4 Quarterly Goals update Final reading and adoption of water, sewer, & stormwater City Council City Manager Finance Director December 2 December 22 Regular (Typically Cancelled) 2027 January 12 Work Session City Council City Manager January 6 16 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date January 12 Regular Planning Commission items from December Housekeeping Resolutions Quarterly Donations & Grants NYFS Agreement Outside Orgs-Council City Council City Manager NYFS January 6 January 26 Work Session 2027 Goals Draft City Council City Manager January 20 January 26 Regular Public Works Snow Plowing Operations presentation City Council City Manager PW Director January 20 February 9 Work Session City Council City Manager February 3 February 9 Regular Planning Commission items from January Public Hearing-2028 Budget Calendar and Process 2027 Planning Commission Work Plan- (motion only) 2027 Parks and Environmental Commission Work Plan- (motion only) Adoption of Strategic Plan City Council City Manager Finance Director February 3 February 23 Work Session Miscellaneous Ordinance Revisions City Council City Manager February 17 February 23 Regular City Council City Manager February 17 March 9 Work Session City Council City Manager March 3 March 9 Regular Planning Commission Items from February Finance Annual Report Public Works Annual Report NineNorth Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director PW Director March 3 March 23 Work Session City Council City Manager March 17 March 23 Regular Fire Annual Report Police Annual Report City Council City Manager Police Dept Fire Dept March 17 April 13 Work Session City Council City Manager April 7 April 13 Regular Planning Commission Items from March Quarterly Donations & Grants Arbor Day Proclamation Earth Day Proclamation Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager April 7 April 27 Work Session City Council City Manager April 21 April 27 Regular Insurance Renewal & Tort Limits- Consent Villager of the Year and Business of the Year City Council City Manager Finance Director April 21 May 11 Work Session City Council City Manager May 5 May 11 Regular Planning Commission items from April Salo Park Concert Series Presentation City Council City Manager May 5 17 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date May 25 Work Session City Council City Manager May 19 May 25 Regular City Insurance Renewal City Council City Manager Finance Director May 19 June 8 Work Session City Council City Manager June 2 June 8 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council City Manager June 2 June 22 Work Session City Council City Manager June 16 June 22 Regular City Council City Manager June 16 July 13 Work Session 2028 Initial Property Tax Levy Scenarios City Council City Manager Finance Director July 7 July 13 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Audit Report Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager Finance Director July 7 July 27 Work Session City Council City Manager July 21 July 27 Regular Liquor Operations Mid Year Report VillageFest Presentation Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Public Safety Engagement Presentation City Council City Manager Liquor Op Mgr Police Chief Fire Chief July 21 August 10 Work Session Discuss Updated Levy Scenarios/Detailed General Fund Budget City Council City Manager Finance Director August 4 August 10 Regular Planning Commission items from July City Council City Manager August 4 August 24 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner August 18 August 24 Regular 2028 Proposed Budget & Levy Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director August 18 September 14 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner September 8 September 14 Regular Planning Commission items from August 2028 Preliminary Operating Budget and Debt Levy-PUBLIC HEARING Students in Leadership-Consent City Council City Manager Finance Director Engineer September 8 18