Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC WS PACKET 06232026CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGE WORK SESSION AGENDA Tuesday, June 23, 2026 at 5:30PM Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person. Minutes Approval Of CC WS Meeting Minutes CC 06 -09 -2026 WS.PDF Work Session Topics 2050 Comprehensive Plan Overview Ashley Morello, Assistant City Manager, presenting. COVER MEMO - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OVERVIEW.PDF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PRESENTATION.PDF METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANTS.PDF Future Work Session Dates, Times And Agenda Items Future Agenda Items FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.PDF Adjournment If you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612 -782 -3334 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to promote a high quality of life to those we serve through outstanding city services. 1. A. Documents: 2. A. Documents: 3. A. Documents: 4. 1 CITY OF SAINT ANTHONY VILLAGEWORK SESSION AGENDATuesday, June 23, 2026 at 5:30PMMembers of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so in person.MinutesApproval Of CC WS Meeting MinutesCC 06 -09 -2026 WS.PDFWork Session Topics2050 Comprehensive Plan OverviewAshley Morello, Assistant City Manager, presenting.COVER MEMO - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OVERVIEW.PDFCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN PRESENTATION.PDFMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANTS.PDFFuture Work Session Dates, Times And Agenda ItemsFuture Agenda ItemsFUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.PDFAdjournmentIf you would like to request special accommodations or alternative formats, please contact the City Clerk at 612 -782 -3334 or email city@savmn.com . People who are deaf or hard of hearing can contact us by using 711 Relay. Our Mission is to promote a high quality of life to those we serve through outstanding city services. 1.A.Documents:2.A.Documents:3.A.Documents:4. 2 City of St. Anthony CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Minutes 06/09/2026 Present: Mayor & Council: Mayor Wendy Webster, Councilmembers Thomas Randle and Jan Jenson Absent: Councilmembers Nadia Elnagdy and Lona Doolan Staff: Assistant City Manager Ashley Morello, Ehlers Senior Municipal Advisor Stacie Kvilvang Others: None Call to Order: Mayor Webster called the Work Session to order at 5:30 p.m. 1. Approval of CC WS Meeting Minutes A. May 26, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Councilmember Jenson asked whether the next step for the previous meeting’s discussion was to present it to the Planning Commission. Assistant City Manager Morello confirmed that this would be the next step in the process and that they had already held the public hearing. Councilmember Jenson reflected on his attendance at the Metro Cities Annual Meeting. He noted that the Mayor of New Brighton stated that they spent a lot of time communicating their ADU ordinance to the public before it was implemented. He expressed the value of this input and emphasized the need for a concrete communication plan to the community. Mayor Webster asked whether Councilmember Jenson is just seeking more community engagement as they move forward with implementing the ADU ordinance. Councilmember Jenson confirmed this. Councilmember Randle asked what the purpose of community engagement would be. Councilmember Jenson stated that the goal is to increase community awareness of the ADU ordinance. Motion by Councilmember Randle, seconded by Councilmember Jenson, to approve the City Council Work Session Minutes of May 26, 2026, as presented. Motion carried 3-0. 2. Work Session Topics A. Public Finance Policy Ehlers Senior Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that, following previous work session discussions about Council priorities for redevelopment, they had expressed interest in guiding principles for their community. These guidelines would help developers understand expectations when 3 June 9, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 2 requesting assistance. She noted that the Public Finance Policy contains statutory and local requirements. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang reviewed that the statutory requirements are a part of the Business Subsidy Policy. This applies to any commercial business, not residential. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang highlighted statutory additions to the policy, which included a minimum of one full-time equivalent job paying at least 150 percent of the state minimum wage. She noted that this is a floor, and if more jobs are desired, a higher amount can be added to the final agreement. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang recognized the priority for affordable housing in St. Anthony. She highlighted that Staff added several items to address this concern, including asking developers to include affordable units at 60 percent of the area median income in their Section Two multi-family units, under Objectives for Providing Public Assistance. She commented that this, too, is somewhat adjustable, but provides a starting point for discussion. The second place where affordable housing is emphasized is in Section Three under the Public Financing Principles. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang overviewed that anyone requesting assistance must file a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for 26 years. She noted that this is very standard and helps new buyers understand affordability requirements. Councilmember Jenson provided an example of a developer who sells a property after ten years, which is under these requirements. He asked if they would have to comply with the affordability requirements for sixteen years. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang confirmed that it is true. Councilmember Jenson asked if owners are required to extend this. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated they are not. Councilmember Jenson questioned whether this is because the property will lose value and become naturally more affordable. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang corrected this and noted that most developers are not receiving assistance for the full period. Councilmember Jenson asked who manages the controlled rent growth. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that if a developer has a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, they must annually submit reports to the City demonstrating compliance with affordability agreements. Councilmember Jenson expressed concern for a 55-plus community in Silver Lake Village. He noted that rent was rising faster than Social Security, and that many residents live off Social Security. He asked if there is protection for people in this situation. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that there is not, and that these requirements are based on annually published HUD guidelines. Councilmember Jenson asked if there are ways they can implement protections for individuals in these circumstances through rent controls. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that there is not, given that rent controls lead to a lack of development. She cited case studies from St. Paul to prove this. Councilmember Randle commented that he believed that when cities become involved in these issues, things get worse. He stated that he had never seen situations in which cities become involved in rent controls that benefit tenants. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang reminded the Council that this is not a rent control policy, only an expectation that developers include affordable units. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang continued by introducing Section Four-Point-Two, which stipulates that the City’s desire is 20 percent affordable housing at 50 percent of the area’s median income. She 4 June 9, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 3 noted that this is routine and that there is also flexibility through negotiations with developers. However, she noted that the higher the expectations, the more assistance may be required. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that currently, around 20 years of assistance is standard. Councilmember Jenson asked what the difference is between item number one in Section Two and item number four in Section Four-Point-Two. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that Section Two reflects the broader purposes and goals of this policy and explains why they matter. She noted that Section Four-Point-Two reflects the City's ultimate desires and recognizes that, to achieve them, the City may have to pay more. The first section has less flexibility than the second section discussed. Councilmember Jenson noted that they have not identified whether they want deeper affordability at 30 or 40 percent. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that this provides the option to attempt to require this, but does not stipulate that it must happen. This language allows the Council and City to explore further. Assistant City Manager Morello noted that these discussions with developers will occur on a case- by-case basis as a negotiation rather than as a set policy. Mayor Webster sought clarification on the difference between Housing TIF districts and Redevelopment TIF districts. She asked if there are any current Housing TIF districts in St. Anthony. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated they do not. She noted that the last was decertified many years ago, but that the City does have two Redevelopment TIF districts. Mayor Webster asked if this is why these requirements do not apply to Housing TIF districts. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang confirmed that it is correct. She highlighted that Redevelopment TIF districts are designed to encourage the removal of blight, and the proposed guidelines direct developers on how the City would like that blight removed. Councilmember Randle asked where the two Redevelopment TIF districts are. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated they are at the Ruby and Silver Lake Village. She highlighted that Silver Lake Village will be decertified in 2031. Mayor Webster requested an overview of the policy language beginning on page 11. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang commented that she had already provided the highlights of this section as they relate to Council goals. The rest is mostly standard policy formatting in the Metro Area. Mayor Webster highlighted item six under Section Three, Public Financing Principles. She noted that there has been prior disappointment in the community when affordability-level requirements are removed before the TIF district expires. She appreciated that the affordability requirements were to persist until the end of the TIF district. Councilmember Jenson expressed appreciation for the section relating to the length of affordability requirements. Mayor Webster indicated that the five-year operation commitment after the benefit date was useful. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang noted that this is a statutory requirement. 5 June 9, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 4 Councilmember Randle asked if this was the same as the subsidy agreement. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated that if you enter into a subsidy agreement with a business, the business must meet wage and job goal requirements and remain in operation for 5 years after the subsidy is disbursed. Councilmember Jenson asked why one section requires 20 percent affordable housing at 50 percent of the median area income, while the summary uses a different figure. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang stated it is not different, but noted that the summary indicates these are goals, not requirements, and they may not be met in this exact fashion. Assistant City Manager Morello noted that it would be helpful if the Council obtained consensus on whether they would like to move forward with this and if they need modifications to the proposed language. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang recommended a Public Hearing, and that it would be forwarded to the Department of Economic Development. Councilmember Jenson noted that his questions were answered and that he has no proposed changes. He commented that affordable housing would likely require TIF subsidies. Councilmember Randle expressed disdain for subsidization. Councilmember Jenson amended his statement, stating that the Council would be asked for TIF subsidies. Councilmember Jenson noted that there have been previous developments, such as the Valero, which were done without TIF. He commented that the Council should have high expectations for developers requesting TIF and require them to justify their need for TIF. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang noted that Councilmembers do not have to vote in favor of the assistance when it is presented, but highlighted that Staff conducts thorough research to determine whether the developers actually require the assistance. Councilmember Randle highlighted that his concerns regarding TIF stem primarily from the lack of available area for development. Mayor Webster noted that these policies help explain the City's goals to developers, regardless of whether TIF is approved. Mayor Webster appreciated Councilmember Randle’s qualms about TIF and emphasized the importance of striking a balance between using TIF to encourage development and avoiding the burdens it can bring. Mayor Webster asked whether the Council is comfortable moving forward with the presented draft of the Public Finance Policy. The Councilmembers confirmed that they are. Mayor Webster directed Assistant City Manager Morello to move forward with the policy as presented. B. Franchise Fees Municipal Advisor Kvilvang noted that the Council had expressed interest in gaining information about the implementation of franchise fees. She directed Council to the memorandum, which provided an overview of customer accounts by class obtained from Excel. She noted that the revenue projections would be different when data is obtained from CenterPoint, which provides gas. She noted that the staff proposed three options for franchise fees that could be utilized. She 6 June 9, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 5 clarified that the difference between Small CI Demand and Small CI Non-Demand is that Demand businesses must have constant power and, therefore, pay a higher rate. She informed the Council that Large CIs are the major businesses in the City and that there are 28 such accounts. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang noted that they will never be able to provide information on which data points belong to whom or what business. She reviewed the first-phase option, which is to apply the Metro Average charge either as a flat fee based on the unit's category or as a percentage of the unit's category. She noted that the percentage is less common, and many communities have switched to a flat fee for predictability. Using this model, the staff predicted that the annual amount would be approximately 627,000 dollars at a rate of approximately 4 dollars per utility for single-family or any residential property. For Small CI Demand and Non-Demand, the cost is 6 to 28 dollars per unit, depending on demand status, for a total of approximately 144 to 672 dollars. For Large CI, it is proposed at 135 or 270 dollars per month, totaling around 3,200 dollars per year. She noted that the bulk of the revenue comes from residential units. She reviewed the second option, which attempts to alleviate some of the burden on the residential areas. She stated that the resident payment would remain at four dollars, but all other payments would double the metro average. She highlighted that this would allow the City to generate around 844,000 dollars a year in revenue, and the burden would be around equal for both residents and businesses. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang finished by describing the third option, which pushes 60 percent of the burden onto commercial and only 40 percent onto residential. She stated that this would involve setting all commercial fees at the high end of the metro area, aside from the Large CI, which would only increase by 10 dollars, as anything more would result in a very substantial bill. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang informed the Council that the third plan would generate around one million dollars. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang directed the Council that the plan they select depends on beliefs about where the tax burden should lie, but reminded them that commercial businesses have a financial incentive to utilize their utilities. She noted that even in commercial-heavy areas, the burden of Franchise Fees typically lies on the commercial businesses rather than residents. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang then provided background on the City's financial needs. She noted that the financial requirements for upgrades to the fire and police departments are significant. She informed the Council that paying the debt for this would be around one point five million dollars. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang noted that Franchise Fees could be a way to remove the burden of paying this debt from the tax levy. Mayor Webster thanked Municipal Advisor Kvilvang for the detailed overview of the three different options and their revenue potentials. Mayor Webster noted that she serves on the Nine North board, that there may be Franchise Fees for broadband in the coming months, and asked Council to consider how that could benefit the City. She asked the Council for their thoughts on the three plans. Councilmember Randle stated that the first plan, which places a burden on residential units, is of no interest to him. He noted it is illogical to place the majority of the burden on residents if the goal is to lower the levy. He expressed that imposing fees on residents is not something he is interested in. Mayor Webster noted that if the Council chooses to implement Franchise Fees, they must be applied to every account. The Council only controls the fees. Councilmember Jenson highlighted that the City needs a revenue stream to address the public safety improvements. He stated that the third plan is the best way to address these costs in the 7 June 9, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 6 near future. Councilmember Randle stated that if that were the case, he would be interested in requiring that the funds be allocated to these debts rather than allowing them to be used for other projects. Assistant City Manager Morello requested that the Council discuss whether they would like Franchise Fees to be allocated specifically for special projects or to be used for special projects. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang noted that this cannot be used for levy relief and that Franchise Fee revenues are traditionally dedicated to Capital Improvement Projects, Park Improvements, or Road Reconstruction Projects. She recommended allowing flexibility in the policy. Mayor Webster asked if that was required in State statues. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang confirmed that you must outline how Franchise Fees will be used. Mayor Webster commented that Franchise Fees are a way to allocate funds from all properties to projects that benefit all properties, such as the police force, firefighters, sidewalks, roads, and more. Councilmember Jenson asked how City-owned parks play into this. Municipal Advisor Kvilvang said there is no current language in the draft addressing this, but that some cities charge themselves at the residential rate. Councilmember Jenson noted that it does not really matter, as the cost will still fall on the taxpayer. Mayor Webster asked the Council whether they would like to move forward and which option they were most interested in. Councilmember Jenson expressed interest in the third plan, which shifts the majority of the burden onto commercial properties. He proposed utilizing these fees to build seed money for a new Public Safety Facility. He also commented that many City buildings are over 30 years old and in need of maintenance. Councilmember Jenson encouraged the Council to plan for these renovations. Councilmember Randle stated that if they move forward, he would be more supportive of the two plans that shift the burden off of the residents. He also noted a higher level of support when the funds are dedicated to specific, necessary projects. Mayor Webster acknowledged the community value of public safety. She noted that the police facility is outdated, and the fire station is past capacity. She highlighted that public support for these fees may be higher, given general support for public safety, if the funds are allocated to improving public safety resources. Mayor Webster noted that the burden on residents does not change, as it remains at 4 dollar per utility per month across all plans. Mayor Webster noted Councilmember Randle’s preference for a lowered burden on residents, and Councilmember Jenson’s preference for the third option. Councilmember Randle expressed support for the third option. He stated that his support is contingent on Franchise Fees being dedicated to a specific project. Mayor Webster reiterated the immediate need for a new Public Safety Facility and the longer-term goal of improving City Hall. She proposed utilizing Franchise Fees for building improvements at the 8 June 9, 2026 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 7 moment, but allowing flexibility to contribute some of this money to road improvements in the future. Mayor Webster indicated support for plans two and three, and appreciated the perspectives shared by the Council. She stated that plan three provides a better balance to shift the burden off of residents. She agreed with Councilmember Randle’s desire to dedicate these funds specifically to certain projects to enhance community transparency. Mayor Webster requested confirmation that the Council had reached a consensus to move forward with option three. The Council confirmed that they would like to move forward with Franchise Fee Plan Three. Mayor Webster reminded the Council that a discussion of Broadband Franchise Fees would be taking place in the future. Assistant City Manager Morello confirmed that this would occur, and it was tentatively slated for September. Mayor Webster and the Council thanked Municipal Advisor Kvilvang for her time and the information she provided. 3. Future Work Session Dates, Times, and Agenda Items A. Future Agenda Items 4. Adjournment Mayor Webster adjourned the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 6:26 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Samina Crabtree TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 9 MEMORANDUM To:Saint Anthony Village City Council From:Ashley Morello, Assistant City Manager Date:June 23, 2026 Request: 2050 Comprehensive Plan Overview BACKGROUND The City updates its Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) every ten years. The Comprehensive Plan is a long-term planning document that cities used to plan for the next twenty years; in this case, cities are planning their Comp Plan for what they envision for their community by the year 2050. In the Twin Cities metro, comp plans are reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan Council every ten years. City staff has invited Metropolitan Council staff to attend the work session to provide an overview of the Comprehensive Plan (see the presentation), as well as to answer any questions from the Council. OVERVIEW Metropolitan Council staff will provide context to define the Comprehensive Plan, as well as describe the Metropolitan Council’s role with the Comp Plan. The rest of this memo serves to provide an overview of what the Council can expect as City staff initiate Comprehensive Planning efforts. City Council Joint Work Session June 30, 2026 The City Council has a joint work session with members of the Planning Commission and the Parks and Environmental Commission scheduled on Tuesday, June 30. The goal of this work session is for the group to identify preferred engagement and outreach with the community for the development of the plan. As with other packets, meetings materials will be sent prior to the meeting. This will include a copy of one of the chapters from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan entitled “Community Vision and Goals” so the group has an understanding of what engagement looked like for the previous plan development. Seeking Consultant Services City staff will be seeking consultant services to lead the management and development of the City’s 2050 Comp Plan. It is common for cities to utilize a consultant for their Comp Plans. The City anticipates that the consultant will be a key resource for engagement and outreach throughout the Plan. The City will plan to have an agreement with a selected consultant in place by the end of 2026, with the majority of the consultants’ activities, including engagement and plan development, to occur in 2027. 2050 Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee The City will have a Steering Committee that will meet regularly to provide oversight for the Comprehensive Plan. The Steering Committee members are still to be finalized and will comprise of members of the Council, the Parks and Environmental Commission, the Planning Commission, and selected staff. 10 Required Review Process The 2050 Comprehensive Plan is due to the Metropolitan Council by December 31, 2028. The City is required to fulfill the following steps before submitting their plans to the Metropolitan Council: Hold a public hearing Obtain approval from local governing body Share with adjacent and affected jurisdictions for review (required 6 months for review) The Metropolitan Council recommends that communities share their draft plans with adjacent and affected jurisdictions by June 30, 2028. Planning Assistance Grant The Metropolitan Council offers planning assistance grants to provide support for communities developing 2050 Comp Plans. The City of Saint Anthony Village is an eligible community and intends to apply for the planning assistance grant. REQUEST The request for this discussion is for the Council to be prepared with any questions they may have for the Metropolitan Council staff. Staff is also seeking parameters from Council to understand the Council’s communication preferences throughout the Comp Plan planning process. Staff would need to plan for any additional work sessions or meetings as needed. ATTACHMENTS Presentation Metropolitan Council Planning Assistance Grants Resources 11 6/17/2026 1 Guiding Regional Land Use The Comprehensive Planning Process and some of the Met Council’s Technical Assistance April 2025 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l 1 Recap: 10-Year Regional Planning Cycle 0 1 12 6/17/2026 2 2 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Statutory Authority found in the Metropolitan Land Planning Act The Metropolitan Land Planning Act, as established by state statute, lays out the decennial planning cycle and mandates regionally congruent comprehensive plans. Minnesota Statute § 473.175 REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLANS: Subdivision 1. For compatibility, conformity. The council shall review the comprehensive plans of local governmental units, prepared and submitted pursuant to sections 473.851 to 473.871, to determine their compatibility with each other and conformity with metropolitan system plan. 3 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Recap: Local Comprehensive Plans The Role of the Plan • Set the community’s vision • Guide growth and development • Identify key issues and strategies to address them • Provides reasoning for public facilities plans/budgets • Provides guidance for decision-making Update Ordinances Comprehensive Plan Zoning Ordinances Official Controls Implementation Actions Subdivision Ordinances Capital Improvement Plan Small Area Studies Feasibility Studies New Programs 2 3 13 6/17/2026 3 4 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Local Comprehensive Plans Plan Elements Minnesota Statutes require communities to address certain topic areas, or plan elements, in comprehensive plans. These include land use, transportation, water resources (wastewater, surface water, water supply), parks and trails, housing, and plan implementation. The Council may also identify additional plan elements of regional importance that communities are encouraged, but not required, to incorporate into comprehensive plans. For example, Thrive MSP 2040 included resilience and economic competitiveness as optional plan elements. Revised statutory requirements now include climate planning and this will be updated for local governments after the issuance of System Statements. The Council’s Local Planning Handbook contains a webpage for each plan element that outlines minimum requirements and optional elements and connects communities to resources to help complete and implement the comprehensive plan. This is currently undergoing a comprehensive update to prepare for the 2050 planning cycle. 5 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Minimum Requirements 4 5 14 6/17/2026 4 6 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Technical Assistance: Local Planning Handbook The One-Stop-Shop for Comprehensive Planning • Designed to support communities with the update of their local comprehensive plans. • Clear guidance on minimum requirements and how to meet them • Tools, maps, resources, and technical assistance • To help meet minimum requirements • To get more out of their local planning process • To help with a variety of planning issues of interest to communities across the region • Community-specific information and checklists • Training and resources beyond the minimum requirements Link: Home - Local Planning Handbook Tools Individual Community Pages Checklist of Minimum Requirements Affected Jurisdictions List Online Submittal Portal Status Tracking Dynamic Maps 7 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Technical Assistance: Local Planning Handbook Local Planning Highlights • Showcase communities implementing good local planning practices through short articles • Cover a range of topics (e.g., affordable housing, racial equity, economic competitiveness, community engagement) • Helpful for communities interested in implementing something similar (a good opportunity to learn from other local governments in the region) 6 7 15 6/17/2026 5 8 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Technical Assistance: Local Planning Assistance Team Roles and Responsibilities • Unit within Community Development • Assist local governments with updating, amending, and implementing the comprehensive plan • Share resources and provide technical assistance • Implement the Metropolitan Land Planning Act 9 Me t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i l Direct Planning Assistance: Sector Representative Program Program Overview • Outreach program to local governments • Assigned Sector Representative to each Council District • Aims to improve communication and relationships with local governments Roles & Responsibilities • Provide technical assistance to local governments • Serve as a liaison between local governments, Council staff, and Metropolitan Council Members • Help local governments understand regional policy and its implications for each community 8 9 16 6/17/2026 6 Co n t a c t s Amber Turnquest, AICP Planning Analyst, Local Planning Assistance; District 2, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (651) 602-1576 Amber.Turnquest@metc.state.mn.us 10 17 18 19 20 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date 2026 June 30 Joint Work Session Comprehensive Plan Preliminary Planning City Council City Manager June 24 July 14 Work Session Sustainable Building Ordinance ADU Ordinance City Council City Manager City Planner July 8 July 14 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Audit Report Retail Operations Mid Year Report Cannabis Enterprise Fund Marketplace Store Special Event Permit Active Transportation Demonstration City Council City Manager Finance Director City Engineer Retail Op Mg July 8 July 28 Work Session 2027 Initial Property Tax Levy Scenarios City Council City Manager Finance Director July 22 July 28 Regular VillageFest Presentation Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Public Safety Engagement Presentation Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager Police Chief Fire Chief July 22 August 10 Work Session Discuss Updated Levy Scenarios/Detailed General Fund Budget City Council City Manager Finance Director August 4 August 10 Regular Planning Commission items from July Police Officers Swearing-In City Council City Manager August 4 August 25 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner August 19 August 25 Regular 2027 Proposed Budget & Levy Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director August 19 September 8 Work Session Broadband franchise fees City Council City Manager City Planner September 2 September 8 Regular Planning Commission items from August 2027 Preliminary Operating Budget and Debt Levy-PUBLIC HEARING Students in Leadership-Consent Broadband Franchise Fees City Council City Manager Finance Director Engineer September 2 September 22 Work Session Existing and Future Community Center Needs Discussion City Council City Manager September 16 September 22 Regular Spirit of St. Anthony Award Fire Prevention Presentation Planning Commission items from August Climate Plan Update Energy Action Plan Update City Council City Manager Fire Dept Sustain. Coord. September 16 October 13 Work Session 2027 Long Term Capital Budget Plalns City Council City Manager October 7 21 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date October 13 Regular City Council City Manager October 7 October 27 Work Session 2027 Utility Rates and Budgets City Council City Manager October 21 October 27 Regular Quarterly Donations & Grants Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager October 21 November 10 Work Session Green to Go Ordinance City Council City Manager November 4 November 10 Regular Score Grant Funding Application Approval Canvass Election Results City Council City Manager November 4 November 16 Work Session Commission Interviews City Council City Manager November 10 November 24 Work Session City Council City Manager November 18 November 24 Regular Fire Poster Contest Winners Approval Plans & Specifications & Order Advertisement for Bids for the upcoming Street Project Fee Schedule Review City Council City Manager Fire Chief City Engineer November 18 December 8 Work Session Goal Setting Preparation City Council City Manager December 2 December 8 Regular Planning Commission items from November Appoint Parks and Planning Commissioners and Chair/Vice Chairs Setting Salary of City Manager Authorizing Transfers & Closing of Specified Funds Setting the 2027 City & HRA Budgets and Final Property Tax Levy - PUBLIC HEARING 2027 Fee Schedule MS4 Quarterly Goals update Final reading and adoption of water, sewer, & stormwater City Council City Manager Finance Director December 2 December 22 Regular (Typically Cancelled) 2027 January 12 Work Session City Council City Manager January 6 January 12 Regular Planning Commission items from December Housekeeping Resolutions Quarterly Donations & Grants NYFS Agreement Outside Orgs-Council City Council City Manager NYFS January 6 January 26 Work Session 2027 Goals Draft City Council City Manager January 20 22 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date January 26 Regular Public Works Snow Plowing Operations presentation City Council City Manager PW Director January 20 February 9 Work Session City Council City Manager February 3 February 9 Regular Planning Commission items from January Public Hearing-2028 Budget Calendar and Process 2027 Planning Commission Work Plan- (motion only) 2027 Parks and Environmental Commission Work Plan- (motion only) Adoption of Strategic Plan City Council City Manager Finance Director February 3 February 23 Work Session Miscellaneous Ordinance Revisions City Council City Manager February 17 February 23 Regular City Council City Manager February 17 March 9 Work Session City Council City Manager March 3 March 9 Regular Planning Commission Items from February Finance Annual Report Public Works Annual Report NineNorth Presentation City Council City Manager Finance Director PW Director March 3 March 23 Work Session City Council City Manager March 17 March 23 Regular Fire Annual Report Police Annual Report City Council City Manager Police Dept Fire Dept March 17 April 13 Work Session City Council City Manager April 7 April 13 Regular Planning Commission Items from March Quarterly Donations & Grants Arbor Day Proclamation Earth Day Proclamation Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager April 7 April 27 Work Session City Council City Manager April 21 April 27 Regular Insurance Renewal & Tort Limits- Consent Villager of the Year and Business of the Year City Council City Manager Finance Director April 21 May 11 Work Session City Council City Manager May 5 May 11 Regular Planning Commission items from April Salo Park Concert Series Presentation City Council City Manager May 5 May 25 Work Session City Council City Manager May 19 May 25 Regular City Insurance Renewal City Council City Manager Finance Director May 19 23 FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS Date Type Staff Present / Contributing Packet Due Date June 8 Work Session City Council City Manager June 2 June 8 Regular Planning Commission Items from May City Council City Manager June 2 June 22 Work Session City Council City Manager June 16 June 22 Regular City Council City Manager June 16 July 13 Work Session 2028 Initial Property Tax Levy Scenarios City Council City Manager Finance Director July 7 July 13 Regular Planning Commission items from June Quarterly Donations & Grants Audit Report Quarterly Goals Update City Council City Manager Finance Director July 7 July 27 Work Session City Council City Manager July 21 July 27 Regular Liquor Operations Mid Year Report VillageFest Presentation Night to Unite Presentation Night to Unite Proclamation Public Safety Engagement Presentation City Council City Manager Liquor Op Mgr Police Chief Fire Chief July 21 August 10 Work Session Discuss Updated Levy Scenarios/Detailed General Fund Budget City Council City Manager Finance Director August 4 August 10 Regular Planning Commission items from July City Council City Manager August 4 August 24 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner August 18 August 24 Regular 2028 Proposed Budget & Levy Presentation SANB School District Update City Council City Manager Finance Director August 18 September 14 Work Session City Council City Manager City Planner September 8 September 14 Regular Planning Commission items from August 2028 Preliminary Operating Budget and Debt Levy-PUBLIC HEARING Students in Leadership-Consent Election Judges General-Consent Certify Outstanding Utility Billings City Council City Manager Finance Director September 8 September 28 Work Session City Council City Manager September 22 September 28 Regular Spirit of St. Anthony Award Fire Prevention Presentation Planning Commission items from August City Council City Manager Fire Dept Sustain. Coord. September 22 24