HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC PACKET 08222006Regular City Council
Meeting following H.R.A.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
August 22, 2006
,7:00 p.m.
Call to Order.
Approval of August 22,2006, H.R.A. AgendaR
II, Consent Agenda,
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. unless a Councilmember or
citizen so requests., in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve July 25, 2006, H.R.A. Minutes. (p.1, 3)
B. Claims. (p. 4)
III. Public Hearings.
IV., General Policy of Business of the H.R.A.
A. Resolution 06-011; Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment
Project Area No. 3 and Adopting a Modification to the Tax Increment Financing
Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 therein. Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers &
Associates presenting. (p. 5 - 7)
V. Staff Reports.
VII. Information and Announcements.
VIII. Adj ournment.
F:\Council Meetings\2006\08222006UIRA Agendapg#.doc
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
.2 MOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
3
4
5 CALL TO ORDER.
6 Chair Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
7
8 ROLL CALL.
9 Commissioners present: Chair Faust; Commissioners Gray, Horst, Stille, and Thuesen.
10 Commissioners absent: None.
11 Also present: City Manager Mornson. City Attorney Lindgren
12
13 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
14
15
16 I. APPROVAL OF JULY 25, 2006 H.R.A. AGENDA.
17
18 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Horst, to approve the July 25,
19 2006 Dousing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
20 Motion carried unanimously®
irA�1 YI �II lr� I I!
21
22 II. CONSENT AGENDA.
23
24 A. Approval of June 13, 2006 HRA Minutes
25 B. Claims
26
27 Motion by Commissioner Stille, seconded by Commissioner Gray, to approve the Consent
28 Agenda.
29 Motion carried unanimous y�
30
31
32 IIL PUBLIC HEARINGS,
33 None
34
35
36 IV. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE H.R.A.
37
38 A. Resolution 06-009, Calling for a Public Hearing on TIF policy._
39
40 Ms. Stacy Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, stated before the Council is a modification to
41 Redevelopment Project No. 3 and TIF District No. 3. Ms. Kvilvang stated as Ehlers &
42 Associates completed the City Tax Increment Financing reports for the State Auditor, it was
43 determined the City would have excess increment ($247,405) in 2005. Excess increment is
44 defined as increment generated in excess of what was budgeted.
45
46 Ms. Kvilvang stated in 2005, the Legislature changed TIF law to require communities spend or
47 return any excess increment within nine months after the end of the year -- September 1St of the
48 following year. Ms. Kvilvang indicted Ehlers & Associates recommends the HRA and City
49 Council modify the TIF budget for the District to match it to expected revenues. This needs to be
HRA Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2006
Page 2
1 completed by September 1, 2006. This modification would show the increment is being spent to
2 provide the City and HRA maximum flexibility for use of future increment. Ms'. Kvilvang noted
3 that Ehlers & Associates assumed the majority of the increment would be needed to satisfy
4 payment of outstanding bonds for the District. Ms. Kvilvang stated an analysis to determine what
5 will be generated over the term of the District and what would be needed to pay off the bonds
6 will be completed. The District would be decertified in 2023. To the extent there is any
7 increment not needed to pay for obligations in this District, Ms Kvilvang recommended the City
8 pool the f mds to pay for redevelopment costs in TIF District 3-5 or for any redevelopment
9 projects in Project Area No. 3. TIF District 3-5 is the Silver Lake village Redevelopment area.
10
11 Ms. Kvilvang pointed out that since this is a budget modification, the City Council would be
12 required to hold a public hearing. She stated in order to begin the budget modification process,
13 the HRA needs to request the City Council call for a public hearing on August 22, 2006, on the
14 proposed adoption of a modification to the redevelopment plan for Redevelopment Project No. 3
15 and the proposed modification to Tax Increment Financing District No. 3.
16
17 Mayor Faust stated the reason the Housing and Redevelopment Meeting is being called first is
18 because the Council must call for a public hearing on August 22, 2006. If it were not done this
19 way, the time frame would not be met.
20
21 Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve Resolution
22 HRA 06009 requesting a call for public hearing on a proposed modification to the
23 Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3 and the proposed modification to
24 Tax Increment Financing District No. 3.
25 Motion passed unanimously.
-- q
.�e�.ru
26
27
28 B. Resolution 06-010; Reimbursement of qualified costs in TIF District No. 3-5 not
29 originally outlined in the Development Contract.
30
31 Ms. Kvilvang reported the City/HRA entered into a contract for private redevelopment in
32 December 19, 2003. As part of that contract the City/HRA agreed to put in various public
33 improvements including roadways, sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, and storm water ponding.
34 It was agreed to by the parties that if these expenditures exceeded available revenue to the
35 City/HRA, the developer would pay for the TIF qualified costs and the City would
36 reimburse the developer through additional tax increment if it were available in the future.
37
38 Ms. Kvilvang stated the developer paid for cost overruns the City did not have the funds to pay
39 for in the amount of $360,777. She stated the developer provided documentation to Ehlers &
40 Associates with regards to the qualified costs. Ms. Kvilvang stated the developer is requesting
41 the City/HRA to reimburse them for the costs as agreed to. Due to the success of the project
42 overall, Ehlers & Associates determined there is sufficient increment available to reimburse the
43 developer for those costs. The reimbursement would be from TIF revenue bond proceeds
44 generated as part of the take out financing being completed for the commercial portion of the
45 project.
46
47
HRA Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2006
Page 3
1 Councilmember Stille asked Ms. Kvilvang to comment on the status of project with regard to
2 further cost over runs.
.3
4 Ms. Kvilvang replied this is the extent of the cost overruns for Phase I. She believes the Phase II
5 budget is in line with the project, but once they dig into it things may come forward.
6
7 Commissioner Stille stated the TIF is coming very favorably so one takes the good with the bad.
8
9 Ms. Kvilvan stated the project is performing well past expectations.
10
11 Chairman Faust indicated if he were to characterize cost overruns, he would also characterize
12 revenues also. Chairman Faust stated the City actually .did plan this, and the developers have
13 basically been the bankers.
14
15 Ms. Kvilvan agreed with Chairman Faust
16
17 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, Seconded by Councilmember gray to approve Resolution
18 .06-010; Reimbursement of qualified costs in TIF District No. 3 -5 not originally outlined in the
19 redevelopment contract.
20
21
22 V. STAFF REPORTS,
23 None.
24
25
26 VI, H.R.A. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS,
27 None.
28
29
30 VIL INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
31 None
32
33
34 VIH. ADJOURNMENT.
35
36 Chair Faust closed the HRA meeting at 7:10 p.m.
37
38
39
40
41
K
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
08/1.5/2006
09: Check
Register
GL540R-V06.70
PAGE 1
BANK
VENDOR
CHECK#
DATE
AMOUNT
HRA1 HOUSING
& REDEV CHECKING
009330
APACHE PARK LLC
5973
08/23/06
11276.25
000820
DORSEY & WHITNEY
5974
08/23/06
15,253.90.
008698
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC
5975
08/23/06
22,645.00
008254
LMCIT BERKLEY ADMINIST
5976'08/23/06
10,000.00
008158
RAMSEY COUNTY
5977
08/23/06
36,580.00
.00001
SHADE TREE ACRES
5978
08/23/06
12,000.00
009264
TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD.
5979
08/23/06
11948.37
008273
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
5980
08/23/06
.211.06.00
HOUSING
& REDEV'CHECKING
101,809.52 ***
To:
0.C From:
G
W Date:
Subject:
FREERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
Mike Mornson —HRA Executive Director
Stacie Kvilvang -Ehlers and Associates
July 18, 2006
Modification to Redevelopment Project No. 3 and TIF District No. 3
(Cub Foods)
After completing TIF reporting for the City for the first time this year it was noted that the budget
for the above referenced district was not in compliance with the Office of the State Auditor (OSA)
requirements and therefore was producing what is termed "excess increment" ($247,405 in 2005).
Excess increment is best defined as increment generated in excess of what was budgeted.
In 2005 the Legislature changed TIF law to require communities to spend or return any excess
increment within nine (9) months after the end of the year (by September 1" of following year).
We are recommending that the HRA and CC modify the TIF budget for the District to match it to
expected revenues (needs to be completed prior to September 1, 2006). This modification will
show that the increment is being spent to provide the City and HRA maximum flexibility for use of
future increment. It should be noted that we do assume that the majority of the increment will be
needed to satisfy payment of the outstanding bonds for the District. we will be completing an
analysis to determine what will be. generated over the term of the District (will be decertified in
2023) and what is needed to pay off the bonds. To the extent there is any increment not needed to
pay for obligations in this District, we would recommend that we "pool" the funds to pay for
redevelopment costs in TIF District 3-5 (Silver Labe village Redevelopment) or for any
redevelopment projects in Project Area No. 3.
Since the City and HRA is modifying the TIF budget, the modification is required to go through
the entire public hearing process as if the City and HRA were creating a new TIF district. As part
of this process, the Planning Commission found that the development plans for this district is in
conformance with the City's general development/redevelopment plans of the City at its' August
15, 2006 meeting.
Please contact me at 651-697-8506 with any questions.
cc: Jerry Gilligan -- Dorsey & Whitney
File
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
3060 Centre Pointe Drive Phone: 651=697-8506 Fax: 651-697-8555
Roseville, MN 55113-1105 skvilvang@ehlers-inc.com
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
I ENNBPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES
STATE OF NENNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 06-011
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 3 AND ADOPTING A
MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.3 THEREIN.
WHEREAS, it has been proposed by the Board of Commissioners (the "Board") of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony(the "BRA") and the City of St. Anthony (the "City") that the HRA
adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") for Redevelopment
Project Area No. 3 and adopt a Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Tax Increment Plan
Modification" or together with the Redevelopment Plan Modification, the "Modifications") for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 3 (the "District"), all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, and Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, inclusive, as amended
(the "Act"), all as reflected in the Modifications and presented for the Board's consideration; and
WHEREAS, the BRA has investigated the facts relating to the Modifications and has caused the
Modifications to be prepared; and
WHEREAS, the HRA has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption .
of the Modifications. The HRA has also requested the City Planning Commission to provide for review of and
written comment on Modifications and that the Council schedule a public hearing on the Modifications upon
published notice as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board as follows:
1. The HRA hereby reaffirms, that the District as modified herein is in the public interest and that
when Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was established, it was established as a "redevelopment district"
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10 (a)(1). And finds that the Modifications conform in all
respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the Sate of Minnesota
which is already built up and that the adoption of the proposed Modifications will help provide employment
opportunities in the State, improve the tax base and improve the general economy of the State and thereby
serves a public purpose.
2. The HRA further finds that the Modifications will afford maximum opportunity, consistent
with the sound needs for the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the project area by
private enterprise in that the intent is to provide only that public assistance necessary to make the private
developments financially feasible.
3. Conditioned upon the approval thereof by the City Council following its public hearing .
thereon, the Modifications, as presented to the HRA on this date, are hereby approved, established and adopted
and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
4. - Upon approval of the Modifications by the City Council, the staff, the MRA's advisors and
legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Modifications and for this
purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Board for its consideration all further plans, resolutions,
6
documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Approval of the Modifications does not constitute
approval of any project or a Development Agreement with any developer.
5. Upon approval of the Modifications by the City Council, the City Clerk is authorized and
directed to forward a copy of the Modifications to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and Office of the
State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a.
6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Modifications to the
Ramsey County Auditor and request that the Auditor certify the original tax capacity of the District as
described in the Modifications, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 469.177.
Approved by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St.
Anthony this day of 12006.
ATTEST:
Secretary
7
Chair
Our Mission is to be progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure. I
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
August 22,2006 1
Call to Order, 1
Pledge of Allegiance,
Roll Call.
1. Approval of the August 22,2006, City Council Meeting Agenda. (action requested.)
IL Proclamations and Recognitions.
Consent Agenda.
These items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approval of August 8, 2006, Council Meeting Minutes. (p.-11)
B. Licenses and Permits. (p- 12)
C. Claims. (p. 13 -15)
IV. Public Hearings.
A. Resolution 06-069; Modifications to the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project
No. 3 and TIF District No. 3. Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates presenting. (p. 16 - 29)
V. Reports from Commission and Staff.
VI. General Business of Council. (action requested on all items)
A. Ordinance 06-004; Single Sort Recycling. Kim Moore -Sykes presenting. Final reading)(P. 30 -
43)
B. Resolution 06-070; Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the agreement
between Hennepin County and the City of St. Anthony for Road Maintenance Services.
Mike Mornson presenting.
VII. Reports From City Manager and Councilmembers.
VIII, Community Forum.
Individuals may address the City Council about any item not included on the regular agenda. Speakers are requested to come to the podium, sign their name and address on the form at
the podium, state their name and address for the Clerks record, and limit their remarks to five minutes. Generally, the City Council will not take official action on items discussed at
this time, but may typically refer the matter to staff for afuture report of direct the matter to be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
01ffl4T_W4_
L
NMI
��M' �Iigk"Iuwalll
1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
3 August 8, 2006
4
5
6 CALL TO ORDER,
7 Mayor Faust called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
8
9 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE,
10 Mayor Faust invited the Council and audience to j oin him in the Pledge of Allegiance.
11
12 ROLL CALL,
13 Present: Mayor Faust; Councilmembers Gray, Horst, Stille, and Thuesen.
14 Absent: None.
15 Also Present: City Manager Mike Mornson and Assistant City Manager Kim Moore -Sykes
16
17
18 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
19 ITEMS.
20
21 I. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 8, 2006 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA,
22
23 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen to approve the City
24 Council meeting agenda of August 8, 2006.
25
26 Motion carried unanimously.
27
28 I. PROCLAMATIONS AND RE C O GNITI ONS.
29 None
30
31 III. CONSENT AGENDA,
32 A. Consider July 25, 2006 Council meeting minutes.
33 B. Consider licenses and permits.
34 C. Claims.
35 D. Resolution 06-066• Approval of Election Judges for State Primary on September 12
36 2006
37
38 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen seconded by .Councilmember Stille, to approve the Consent
39 Agenda items.
40
41 Motion carried unanimously.
42
43 Iv. PUBLIC HEARINGS,
44 None.
45
46 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF,
47 None
48
49 VI. GENERAL POLICYBUSINESS E COUNCIL,
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 2
1 A. Silver Lake Road Projects
2
3 Mr. Craig Twinem, Hennepin County, reported on the Silver Lake Road project. He stated the
4 original project was, scheduled to begin construction in 2007. He informed the Council the
5 County identified funds for a consultant design in the 2006 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
6 with the development of the 2007 CIP, stated Mr. Twinem, it became apparent there would not
7 be enough funding for the property acquisition and the construction in 2007. Mr. Twinem
8 reported the construction funding for the project would be moved to 2008, with the right of way
9 acquisition still scheduled for 2007.
10
11 Mr. Twinem reported consultants Bolton & Menk, Inc. are on schedule with the design to the
12 point that discussions with property owners would begin early 2007. Mr. Twinem indicated,
13 with the new eminent domain laws, the County would like to settle with as many residents as
14 possible before implementing condemnation.
15
16 Councilmember Stille stated he knew it would take lightning speed to get it done in 2007. He
17 asked Mr. Twinem if plans for 2008 were definite.
18
19 Mr. Jim Grube, Hennepin County Engineer, confirmed the 2008 date. Mr. Grube provided a
20 historical perspective on the Silver Lake Road project to date. Mr. Grube reported he had a five
21 year Capital Improvement Program of which he is responsible for the County highway system.
g y y
22 He stated he submits his five-year plan to the County Administrator in June of every year. Mr.
23 Grube explained to the Council how construction money was moved into 2008.
24
25 Mr. Grube informed the Council the Twins Baseball stadium is an item onto itself and did not
26 delay the project; as it is not in the Highway Department's five-year program. Mr. Grube stated,
27 in terms of the overall County budget and capital expenditures, the County Board of Commission
.28 received a proposal for a $50 million library program upgrade across many different libraries
29 within Hennepin County.
30
31 Mr. Grube went on to say, in terms of the plan being 30 percent complete; one gets a good idea
32 of the impacts but not the costs until the design is two-thirds to three quarters complete. Mr.
33 Grube stated he brought this up because it gives Hennepin County one more opportunity to
34 adjust the budget to bring it into perspective.
35
36 Councilmember Thuesen asked Mr. Grube if the Silver Lake Road Project would happen,
37 regardless of factors that could impact it such as rising fuel costs.
38
39 Mr. Grube restated it is important to get one more chance to d adjust the budget to make sure
g
40 Hennepin County can meet 2008 plans. He stated the key is once Hennepin County starts
41 purchasing property for the right of way and negotiating with individuals, it is an: extreme
42 commitment to continue forward.
43
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 3
1 Mayor Faust thanked Mr. Grube and Mr. Twinem for their candor and commitment to the Silver
2 Lake Road project. He stated the explanation they gave for the delay was good. Mayor Faust
3 stressed the City would endeavor to be prepared for next year.
4
5 Be Ordinance 46-404; Single Sort Recycling
6
7 Assistant City. Manager Kim Moore -Sykes presented the second reading of Single -Sort
8 Recycling. Ms. Moore -Sykes summarized that on July 25, Staff brought the topic of Single•Sort
9 Recycling before the Council. Ms. Moore -Sykes stated at that time, Staff was directed to include
10 additional language about glass recycling and container size to the draft.
11
12 Councilmember Horst asked Ms. Moore -Sykes if the 96 -gallon containers would be the
13 maximum size available. He stated he thought there was concern about the size of the containers
14 and asked if haulers provided only 96 -gallon containers.
15
16 Assistant City Manager Moore -Sykes stated this was a line taken from another conununity
17 ordinance as a template. She also stated one hauler has two container sizes and the other has
18 three.
19
20 Councilmember Horst asked if her intention was to set 96 gallons and under as an option.
21
22 Assistant City Manager Moore -Sykes recommended changing the wording to "at least 35
23 gallons" because it seems to be the standard.
24
25 Mayor Faust suggested on Subdivision 11, page 23 of the ordinance, that "or smaller container
26 upon request from the resident" be added. Mayor Faust is concerned with the footprint in the
27 garage and residents who do not need the larger container. Having said that, he asked to hear
28 what the haulers felt.
29
30 Ms. Jennifer Klennert from Waste Management and -Mr. uric S ederstrom with Walters Recycling
31 and Refuse, Inc. addressed the Council.
32
33 IVIS. Klennert stated Waste Management provides a 32, 64 or 96 -gallon container. She stated the
34 customer is initially provided with a 64 -gallon container. She stated a different container would
35 be provided to residents requesting one.
36
37 Mr. Sederstrom reported Walters provides a 38, 67 or 97 -gallon container to residents. He
38 indicated Walters would also change the size if the resident so desires.
39
40 Ms. Klennert and Mr. Sederstrom stated additional containers are provided to customers
41 requesting them.
42
43 Mayor Faust recommended, to keep everyone in concert, a 100 -gallon maximum stated in the
44 ordinance would keep everyone in the industry compliant and upon customer request, a smaller
45 container would be provided.
3
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 4
1 Motion by Councilmember Horst seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Ordinance 006-
2 004, an Ordinance amending Chapter 5 of the City Code, Being the Licenses, Permits and
3 Business Regulations.
4
5 Councilmember Stille commented he is for the recycle change; his only concern is with the
6 larger container and a resident's ability to comply with ordinances to keeping containers out of
7 view. He believes the Council should put some thought into this and suggested the haulers
8 educate and perhaps subsidize enclosures for the containers.
9
10 Mayor Faust stated if residents are in violation they need to be aware the Fire Department would
11 be notified of code violations.
12
13 Motion carried unanini.ou�l o
■ lee rier�r
14
15 Mayor Faust stated the final reading would be at August 26, 2006 meeting.
16
17 C. Resolution 06-067A; IRejecting the Bid for the Foss Road Lift Station_
18
19 Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Inc., reported on the Foss Road Lift Station and Utility
20 Improvement project bids. Mr. Hubmer reported receiving four (4) bids for the Lift Station
21 Improvement project and two (2) bids for the Utility project.
22
23 Mr. Hubmer informed the Council the engineer's estimate for the Foss Lift Station. was
24 $600,000; however, the low bid was $848,500, approximately $250,000 more than the engineer's
25 estimate. Mr. Hubmer then stated the engineer's estimate for the Utility Improvement Project
26 was approximately $906,000 and the low bid received was $1,343,649; approximately $440,000
27 over the engineer's bid. Mr. Hubmer reported six contractors stated they were too busy to
28 submit a bid or it did not fit into their current work program and some did not want to bid
29 because it included a building be constructed over the lift station.
30
31 Mr. Hubmer recommended, based on the small number of bids received and the high bid prices
32 received, City Council reject all bids for the Foss Lift Station and Utility Improvements projects.
33 He recommended revising the bid package to provide a building alternate that includes the
34 options of a building added to the lift station, no building and the third option of j ust some cover
35- in the location of the lift station.
36
37 Mr. Hubmer suggested a better approach and value for the City would be, due to pricing on the
38 pipe bursting and the underground tunneling work, to open the streets, replace it from curb to
39 curb and put in a new water main and sanitary sewer. He stated this could be done for the same
40' price as the pipe bursting technology estimate. Mr. Hubmer believes this is a prudent choice
41 given the condition of the roads.
42
43 Councilmember Thuesen asked if rejected, what time line does the Council have before it needs
44 to deal with this.
45
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 5
I Mr. Hubmer indicated he would like to do the Lift Station improvements this winter. He stated
2 he spoke with the contractors about some uncertainties and some risk in specifications where the
3 contractor could feel comfortable coming down in price without making large assumptions. Mr.
4 Hubmer would like to bid the lift station portion and the forcemain that leaves the station and
5 goes to Roseville next month.
6
7 Commissioner Thuesen asked if the current system, would continue to work and serve. the
8 residents until a better bid was received.
9
10 Mr. Hubmer replied the Silver Lake village Redevelopment Project area would drive the
11 situation. He stated there is currently adequate capacity for the buildings in the area. Mr. Hubmer
12 stated by the time the next phase for the condo units comes on line; he would like to start the
13 project. Mr. Hubmer stated there has been some control issues at the lift station and maintenance
14 concerns and the need for replacement is due to the age of system.
15
16 Mayor Faust asked why the bids came in so high.
17
18 Mr. Hubmer replied there was not a very competitive environment and contractors were busy. He
19 also stated the building over the lift station was an issue for the contractors.
20
21 Mayor Faust asked if Mr. Hubmer thought by separating the projects, bidders would better
22 understand specifications and costs.
23
24 Mi. Hubmer replied yes and they could clarify items better. He stated they bid four lift stations
25 similar to the St. Anthony lift station this past year. He indicated the only difference was the
26 others did not have a building.
27
28 Mayor Faust asked Mr. Hubmer what size structure would be over the lift station and if he had
29 talked to the building owners in the area.
30
31 Mr. Hubmer replied the building size would be about 37 feet by 24 feet. He reported talking to
32 the property and building owner and sharing the plans with them.. Mr. Hubmer stated the best
33 situation would be to have the lift station in a building because when something goes wrong, it is
34 usually during bad weather. He stated there could also be a scaled-down building or an add-on to
35 the project so the bid would be for the lift station and the panels only. He stated this would help
36 determine where to go budget wise.
37
38 Motion by Councilniember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 06-
39 067A; a Resolution rejecting the bids for the Foss Road Lift Station Improvement and the Foss
40 Road Lift Station Utility Improvement projects.
41
42 Motion carried unanimous
43
44
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 6
1
2 D. Resolution 06-067B; Authorizing - re -advertisement for bids for Foss Road Lift
r��.�lrrr�r�r�r.l .�rlr�i��l rrrl�rrrrrir rr�i .�-���I s rlr•�.�rl
3 Station
4
5 Mr. Todd Hubmer, wSB & Associates, Inc. summarized Resolution 06-067B authorizing the
6 preparation of plans, specifications and advertisement for the lift station, any building structures
7 on the site and the forcemain that delivers the sewage from the lift station to the city of Roseville
8 and the Met Council interceptor.
9
10 Mayor Faust asked Mr. Hubmer to explain thero osed schedule.
p p
11
12 Mr. Hubmer stated he anticipates opening for bids b the end of September and awarding the bid
Y p g
13 by the end of September or early October. Mr. Hubmer stated construction would begin in
14 October with final construction completed by May 2007.
15
16 Motion by Councilmember Gray, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen to approve Resolution
17 06-067B; a Resolution ordering plans, specifications and advertisement for bids for the revised
18 Foss Road Lift Station and Forcemain improvements.
19
20 Motion carried unani
mosly
21-
22
1 22 E. Resolution 06-068; Preparing a FeasibilityyStudyor 2007 Street Project
23
24 Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Inc, resented a proposal for a feasibility stud for a
p p p Y Y
25 street reconstruction and utility improvement project in 2007. Mr. Hubmer presented the site
26 plan and pointed out the proposed Street and Utility Reconstruction project locations.
27
28 Councilmember Horst askedif 39th. Avenue is concrete and if the alley south of 27th had
. Y
29 currently been redone. He also mentioned the City receives complaints about the condition of
30 alleys and asked if the improvements would be fully engineered.
31
32 Mr. Hubmer stated the alleys had previously been overlaid in 2000 but the utilities were not
33 updated at that time. He replied the alleys would be fully engineered. He indicated the alleys
Y
34 receive heavy use from garbage trucks, and because they are flat, poor drainage exists.
35
36 Councilmember Horst asked how homeowners participate in alley improvement.
37
38 Mr. Hubrner replied the homeowner is assessed at 100ercent for an alley and 3 o percent for.
p Y
39 street footage.. He stated. this is based on front footage.
40
41 Councilmember Stille
ask.ed how large this proposal is compared to this ear's project.
42
43 Mr. Hubmer replied this proposal was considerably less than this year's project before adding
44 39 Avenue; with the addition of 39th Avenue and Chandler Drive, It would be close or
45 somewhat larger than this year's project.
6
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 7
1 Councilmember Thuesen pointed out that in essence there are two projects as there is something
.2 on the southwest to the northwest side of town. He asked if this would potentially cause higher
3 bidding due to contractors needing to move equipment.
4
5 Mr. Hubmer replied contractors are asked to bid projects in stages and to come in with the utility
6 crew to construct. one part of the job. He usually anticipates and tells the contractor to keep it in
7 control.
8
9 Commissioner Gray referred to the map and pointed out it looks like through 39 oes h to
g g
10 Chandler.
11
12 Mr. Hubmer indicated the yellow line follows the sanitary sewer and does not represent the
13 street.
14
15 Mayor Faust stated this portion of the community could not get to a park without crossing an
16 impediment. He asked how buildings on the south side of the City are serviced by utilities.
17
18 Mr. Hubmer pointed out on the site map where utilities are located and what areas are serviced.
19
20 Mayor Faust asked about the project on Pahl and 27t`.
21
22 Mr. Hubmer stated 27th and Pahl west of Silver Lake Road are back on the schedule for 2007.
23
24 Councilmember Horst asked if, as part of feasibility report, it is feasible to do this project next
25 year.
26
27 Mayor Faust clarified if the City did not do Silver Lake Road in 20071 27th and Pahl would have
28 been done, but now that Silver Lake Road is pushed to 2008, it can be completed next year.
29
30 Councilmember Stille remarked when the City Council talked about funding Silver Lake Road
tY g
31 the Council stated it would take on the debt of typical street projects. He explained this is a wash,
32 as the City would replace different streets.
33
34 Mr. Hubmer pointed out they are basically re -phasing theJ ro'ect to et the most for the City's
p g tY
35 dollars. He stated the City would get all the utilities and the street upgraded for about the same
36 cost of just one utility.
37
38 Mayor Faust clarified, even though it may be a little more expensive, it makes more sense to do
39 it all at one time.
40
r
41 Councilmember Thuesen stated he feels the right thing to do is to invest in the infrastructure. He
42 asked if the City is ahead of curve by taking on chunks at a time and reinvesting in the
43 infrastructure. He also asked if other communities are doing this or are they waiting.
44
7
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 8
1 Mr. Hubmer replied St. Anthony and most communities with utilities of the same age category
g Y
2 are in a rehab program. He explained, because St. Anthony has aggressive clay soil, utilities
3 break down quicker as opposed to cities with sandy soil. He stated .if the aged utilities are left in,
4 maintenance and repair costs would go up consistently -
5
6 Mayor Faust reminded the Council this is a feasibility study and if it comes back as not being
7 feasible, rejecting it is an option.
8
9 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to approve Resolution
10 06-068; a Resolution ordering preparation of a feasibility report for 2007 street and utility
11 improvements.
12
13 Motion carried unanimous
14
15 F. General E'n2ineermg Update
16
17 Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB & .Associates, Inc, summarized the status of general engineering
18 projects within the City. These projects include: the 2005 Street Reconstruction Project, 2006
19 Street Reconstruction Project, and Automated Water Meters.
20
21 Mr. Hubmer reported the 2005 Street Reconstruction Prop
`ect is complete. He informed residents
J
22 if there are issues they feel have not been addressed, to please contact him or Mr. Hartman.
23
24 Mr. Hubmer reported the 2006 Street Reconstruction Project is nearing completion. He stated the
25 contractor completed all utility work, curb and gutter, street paving and is currentlylacin
p g
26 topsoil and sod for the final restoration of the project. Mr. Hubmer stated he anticipates
27 completion by August 11.
28
29 Mr. Hubmer indicated perennials, topsoil, seeding, and landscaping in front of the Village Pub
p g g
30 would be completed as soon as the irrigation is in. Mr. Hubmer reported the sidewalk is in and
31 the asphalt repaired in front of the Montessori.
32
33 -Mr. Hubmer reported two new technologies with automated water meters havePP o ed u p . He
p
34 stated he would meet with a company with remote reading capabilities. He indicated there is a
35 cost savings associated with this technology. Mr. Hubmer anticipates bid packages would be out
36 in the next three weeks.
37
38 Mr. Hubmer informed the Council he had been in contact with arovider of sum um
p pp p
39 inspection and installation services. Mr. Hubmer said the value added is this company knows
p Y
40 what they are looking for and it would be more economical to do both services at the same time.
41
42 Councilmember Thuesen stated in, regards to the 2005 street reconstructs the sod replaced g p on
43 -some of the cutouts is bad. He asked Mr. Hubmer drive around and look at the condition of the
44 sod before this project is closed.
45
8
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 9
1 Mr. Hubmer stated he would do this.
2
3 Councilmember Stille asked if St. Anthony is still looking at partnering with another city to buy
4 the automatic water meters. Mr. Hubmer stated he put an offer out to Long Lake but received
5 no response so the City is moving forward solo.
6
7 Mayor Faust stated he and the City Manager had the opportunity to spend the afternoon looking
8 at the different water projects with the Executive Director of the Middle Mississippi Water
9 Management Organization (MWO). He stated there would be an interface between the Executive
10 Director and Mr. Hubmer, City Attorney Lindgren and City Manager Mornson to look at MWO
11 grant potential for St. Anthony.
12
13 VII. REPORTS FROM CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBERS,
14 City Manager Mornson stated he had been negotiating with Hennepin County on a new road
15 maintenance agreement..
16
17 Mr. Mornson reported Staff is working with Ramsey County to renew the compost site contract.
18
19 Mr. Mornson reported the Comprehensive Plan Task Force would begin meeting again in
20 September.
21
22 Mr. Mornson informed the Council a new cable operator is being trained and stated he is still
23 looking for others as the more individuals that can be trained, the more dependable it would be.
24
25 Councilmember Stille reported attending eight National Night Out parties. He indicated more
26 thought' should be put into planning so more locations could be visited. He thanked everyone for
27 the good turnout.
28
29 Councilmember Thuesen stated he also enjoyed National Night Out. He stated he visited with
30 people he knew and met many others for first time. Councilmember Thuesen congratulated
31 everyone involved with Village Fest. He reported hearing many good comments. H e stated some
32 people commented they would like to see more marching bands.
33
34 Councilmember Thuesen read a report from the Vital Aging Council on two projects they are
35 working on. He .stated one project, consists of gathering emergency contact numbers from
36 businesses for the police department to use in case the business experiences burglaries, fires and
p
37 such. He stated the second project is the painting of fire hydrant caps. Councilmember Thuesen
38 mentioned if anyone is interested in finding out more about the Vital Aging Council, contact:
39 Dennis Cavanaugh (781-7106), Gordon Amundsen (486-2915) or Sally Cain at Community
40 Services (706-1174).
41
42
9
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 10
1 Councilmember Gray reported attending several National Night Out parties also. He thanked the
2 residents who organized the parties and those who attended. He stated there were 3 5 parties .
3 throughout St Anthony. Councilmember Gray thanked Councilmember Horst everyone on that
4 committee for the good work on Village Fest.
5
Councilmember Horst reported the sculpture for Solo Park would be set in mid September. He
replied, in response to marching bands, most bands charge for their services. He indicated he.
would pass on the request. Councilmember Horst reported this was the biggest Village Fest they
have had. He expressed special thanks to: Julie Ann Hunter, Communications; Kathy Mayfield,
Parade Coordinator; Kim Motzel, Silent Auction; Joleen Hodson, Ping Pang; Dave and Lisa
Zurbey, Pop Cans; Diane Sparks, Food Vendors, and a special thanks to sponsors: St. Anthony
Mobile, Fitness Crossroads and Culvers. Councilmember Horst stated no road construction is
scheduled for next year so plan to have another great Village Fest. He is always looking for new
volunteers.
16 Mayor Faust extended his thanks to Councilmember Horst and the Village Fest volunteers. He
17 reported this was a great Village Fest. Mayor Faust thanked the Chamber of Commerce for
18 hosting a golf tournament, the Kiwanis for the pancake breakfast and Staff for their work with
19 the Community.
20
21 Mayor Faust also reported attending several National Night Out parties. Mayor Faust stated this
22 was a great opportunity to meet the neighbors.
23
24 Mayor Faust asked everyone to go to the St. Anthony website and look at the official rain gage.
25
26 VIII, COM UNITY FORD .
27 Mayor Faust invited residents to come forward and address the Council on items not on the
28 regular agenda.
29
30 Hearing none, Mayor Faust moved forward with the agenda.
31
32 Ix. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
33 None.
34
35 X. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENTS,
36 None.
37
38 Xle ADJOURNMENT,
39 Mayor Faust adjourned the meeting at 8:14 p.m.
40
10
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
August 8, 2006
Page 11
1 .
2 Dianna Wise
3 TimeSaver Off 'Site Secretarial, Inc.
4
5 Mayor
6 ATTEST:
7
City Clerk
Saint Anthony Village
DATE: August 22, 2006 Approved:
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: License Clerk
ITEM: License and Permits for Approval:
General Contractors License:
Grand Builders, Mpls, MN
K-5 Construction, Shoreview, MN
Heating and Air Conditioning License:
CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas, Anoda, MN
Krinkie Heating & AIC, St. Paul, MN
Multiple Dwelling License:
Applicant: D & J Properties, 5315 Matterhorn Dr
Location: D & J Properties, 3721 Chandler Dr
Check Register 8110i2006
Amount of
Check Number Date Vendor Payment
27582 8/3/2006 Petty Cash -Bremer Bank $201.58
27584 8/8/2006 Cabina (Budget work session) $113.24
TOTAL $314.82
13
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
08/15/2006
10: Check
Register
`GL540R-V06.70
PAGE .1
BANK
VENDOR
CHECK#
DATE
AMOUNT
FIRS'BREMER BANK NA
000020
AA BATTERY CO
27585
08/23/06
45.74
008964
ACCLAIM BENEFITS
27586
08/23/06
149.94
007252
ALBRECHT
27587
08/23/06
4.09
008474
ALCOPRO
27588
08/23/06
290.00
0.08621.
ALLIANCE MECHANICAL
27589
08/23/06
222.00
009250
AMERICAN MESSAGING
27590
08/23/06
189.28
008945
ANCOMTECHNICAL CENTER
27591
08/23/06
21887.95
008450
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES,
27592
08/23%06
270.46
007835
ARCH WIRELESS-METROCALL
27593
08/23/06
40.54
009348.
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
27594
08/23/06
125.00
007332
BAUER BUILT INC.
27595
08/23/06
92.86
008555
BIFFS, INC.
27596
08/23/06
264.52
007253
BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHO
27597
08/23/06
1.37.16
009349.
BREEZY POINT RESORT
27598
08/23/06
525.00
008652
CARTRIDGE CARE
27599
08/23/06
291.38
000610
CATCO
27600
08/23/06
33.58
002380
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
27601
08/23/06
1,11.4.84
009056
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
27602
08/23/06
.11948.81
000655
CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMEN
27603
08/23/06
73.31
008736
CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT
27604
08/23/06
389.49.
007382
CROWN FENCE & WIRE COMPA
27605
08/23/06
104.20
009227
DELTA MEDICAL SUPPLY GRO
27606
08/23/06
27.48
008834
DEMPSEY'S STUMP SERVICE
27607
08/23/06
145.00
008831
DENNY HECKER'S ROSEDALE
27608
08/23/06
77.48
004110
DICKSON ELECTRIC
27609
08/23/06
88.00
007371.
DISCOUNT STEEL, INC.
27610
08/23/06
63.90
000820
DORSEY & WHITNEY
27611
08/23/06
275.40
008921
DYNAMEX
2761.2
08/23/06
16.64
009352
FARM -RITE EQUIPMENT INC
.27613
08/23/06
445.21
008647
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
27614
08/23/06
93.17
009055
FREEWAY TOWING
27615
08/23/06
484.59
009236
FSH COMMUNICATIONS
2761.6
08/23/06
"58.58
001030
G & K SERVICES INC
27617
08/23/06
785.11
001110
GENERAL IND SUPPLY
27618
08/23/06
49.12
008221
HEDBACK,ARENDT, & CARLSO
27619
08/23/06
51000.00
008944
HENN CNTY INFO TECH DEPT
27620
08/23/06
51568.70
008376
HENNEPIN CNTY SHERIFF'S
27621
08/23/06
11288.91
008252
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC
27622
08/23/06
593.08 .
008658
INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I
27623
08/23/06
85.50
009351
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
27624
08/23/06
10.24
002040
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE
27625
08/23/06
882.58
008254
LMCIT % BERKLEY ADMINIST
27626
08/23/06
42,543.50
002125
MALENICK/JOHN
27627
08/23/06
26.61
002160
MARSHALL CONCRETE PROD
27628
08/23/06
734.85
.00001
MARTIN/MAR.CY
27629
08/23/06
59.14
002230
MENARD LUMBER
27630
08/23/06
97.84
002280
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP.
27631
08/23/06
498.61
009195
MISTER CAR WASH
27632
08/23/06
171.25
009353
MN SPRING & SUSPENSION L
27633
08/23/06
245.80
008430
MPLS DEPT OF HEALTH-FAMI
27634
08/23/06
83.00
002395
MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC
27635
08/23/06
282.44
009283
MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERV
27636
08/23/06
31608.28
008884
MURLOWSKI PROPERTIES
27637
08/23/06
135.35
009350
MURPHY RIGGING & ERECTIN
27638
08/23/06
648.00
007159
NAPA AUTO PARTS
27639
08/23/06
17.02
002505
NARDINI FIRE EQUIP Co
27640
08/.23/06
103.39
008422
NAT'L FIRE PROTECTION AS
27641
08/23/06
120.45
005294
NORSK CONCRETE CONST
27642
08/23/06
009354
NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP
27643
08/23/06
.1.1517.00
11863.75
000045
OFFICE DEPOT
27644
08/23/06
11025.53
007226
OLSON'S PLUMBING
27645
08/23/06
780.00
001230
ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC.
27646
08/23/06
261..70
008805
PETTY CASH.- BREMER BANK
27647
08/23/06
141.90
004492-
QWEST
27648
08/23/06
144.68
008462
RAMSEY COUNTY
27649
08/23/06
320.00
009356
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLI
2765:0
08/23/06
36.87
005238
SPECIALTY RADIO SERVICE
27651
08/23/06
438.12 A
009259
SPRINT
27652
08/23/06
251.34
001810
ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE KIWA
27653
08/23/06
202.00
003260
T A SCHIFSKY & SONS
27654
08/23/06
403.88
009296
T -MOBILE
27655
08/23/06
247.92
.00001
T -N -T- TOOLS, INC.
27656
08/23/06
37.22
009264
TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD.
27657
08/23/06
892.88
009218
THREE D -SPECIALTIES
27658
08/23/06
348.36
007337
TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRE
27659
08/23/06
363.93
007365
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
27660
08/23/06
18.65-
009355
TRANE PARTS CENTER
27661
08/23/06
583.40
•004481
TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY
27662
08/23/06
87.12
008561
UNITED RENTALS COMPANY
27663
08/23/06
503.38
008227
VERIZON WIRELESS
27664
08/23/06
318.77
008388
W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES
27665
08/23/06
548.48
004494-
WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAIN
27666
08/23/06
462.50
002680
-XCEL ENERGY
27667
08/23/06
101174.96
003820
ZAHL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
27668
08/23/06
785.16
BREMER
BANK NA
97,373.87 ***
14
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
0S/15/20Q6 10:
ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
Check
Register
GL540R-VO6.70
PAGE 1
. BANK
VENDOR
CHECK# DATE
AMOUNT
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING ACCOUNT
008964
. 008794
ACCLAIM BENEFITS
ARCTIC GLACIER INC.
.26121
26122
08/23/06
08/23/06
'23.:21
611.00
004687
004293
ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC
BELLBOY CORP.
•26123
26124
08/23/06
08/23/06
46.03
51404.02
004231
•002380
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
CENTER.POINT ENERGY
26125
26126
08/23/06
08/23/06
15,717.95
32.62
004080
009056
CHISAGO LAKES DIST. CO.,
26127.08/23/06
31582.76
004085
CITY OF-ROSEVILLE
CITY OF -ST ANTHONY
26128
26129
08/23/06
08/23/06
384.53
17,395.99
004086
008814
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE
26130
26131
08/23/06
08/23/06
14,583.33
170.56
004095
009085
COCA COLA ENTERPRISES IN
26132
08/23/06
345.80
•008736
CONSTANT CONTACT SUITE
CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT
26133
•26134
08/23/06
08/23/06
•153.00
389:49
004120
• 008697
-EAGLE WINE CO
EX'T'REME BEVERAGE
26135
26136
08/23/06
08/23/06
11833.40
600.00
001030
004172
G & K.SERVICES INC
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC.
261.37
26138
08/23/06
08/23/06
130.03
374.75
004175
'004207
GRIGGS COOPER. & CO INC
HOHENSTEIN'S, INC
26139
26140
08/23/06
08/23/06
61228.69
21252.95
004125
•004220
JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
26141
26142
08/23/06
08/23/06
30,165.31
18,077.64
.00001
008254
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS
26143
08/23/46
11106.11-
009114
'004265
LMCIT p BERKLEY ADMINIST
M; AMUNDSON LLP
26144
26145
08/23/06
08/23/06
21794.25
11761.90
008494
MARK VII SALES INC
MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL
26146
26147
08/23%06
08/23/06
14,511.36
21350.00
004299
MPLS. OXYGEN CO.
26148
08/23/06
26.97
009106
008883
MT GLOBAL
NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY
26149
26150.08/23/06
08/23/06
11369.10
31087.00
009275
PAT KERNS WINE MERCHANTS
26151
08/23/06
344.00
004354
004360
PAUSTIS & SONS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
261.52
26153
08/23/06
08/23/06
11871.50
51015.70
004372
PLUNKETT'S
26154
08/23/06
65.00
004161.
PREMIUM WATERS, INC
26155
08/23/06
108.40
004376
008787
PRIOR WINE CO
PROMOTIONAL PAGES, INC.
26156
26157
08/23/06
08/23/06
21236.04
330.00
004385
009119
QUALITY WINE CO
RECHECK
26158
26159
08/23/06
08/23/06
14,498.85
30.00
009072 .
SPECIALTY WINES & BEV. L
26160
08/23/06
1.83.33
009083
ST. ANTHONY RETAIL DEVEL
26161.
08/23/06.
205.56
004778
TEE JAY NORTH, INC
26162
08/23/06
137.68
008316
WINE COMPANY/THE
26163
08/23/06
75.50
008310
WINE MERCHANTS INC
26164
08/23/06
737.75
LIQUOR
CHECKING ACCOUNT
171,349.06 ***
FREERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
To: Mike Mornson —City Manager
0
From: Stacie Kvilvang —Ehlers and Associates
W
Date: August 22, 2006
Subject: Modification to Redevelopment Project No. 3 and TIF District No. 3
(Cub Foods)
After completing TIF reporting for the City for the first time this year it was noted that the budget
for the above referenced district was not in compliance with the Office of the State Auditor (OSA)
requirements and therefore was producing what is termed "excess increment" ($247,405 in 2005).
Excess increment is best defined as increment generated in excess of what was budgeted.
In 2005 the .Legislature changed TIF law to require communities to spend or return any excess
increment within nine(9)months after the end of the ear(bySe tember 1st of followin ear .
� p following )
We are recommending that the HRA and CC modify the TIF budget for the District to match it to
expected revenues (needs to be completed prior to September 1, 2006). This modification will
show that the increment is being spent to provide the City and HRA maximum flexibility for use of
future increment. It should be noted that we do assume that the majority of the increment will be
needed to satisfy payment of the outstanding bonds for the District. We will be completing an
analysis to determine what will be generated over the term of the District (will be decertified in
2023) and what is needed to pay off the bonds. To the extent there is any increment not needed to
pay for obligations in this District, we would recommend that we "pool" the funds to pay for
redevelopment costs in TIF District 3-5 (Silver Labe Village Redevelopment) or for any
redevelopment projects in Project Area No. 3.
Since the City and HRA is modifying the TIF budget, the modification is required to go through
the entire public hearing process as if the City and HRA were creating a new TIF district. As part
of this process, the Planning Commission found that the development plans for this district is in
conformance with the City's general development/redevelopment plans of the City at its' August
15, 2006 meeting.
Please contact me at 651-697-8506 with any questions.
ce: Jerry Gilligan -- Dorsey & Whitney
File
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
3060 Centre Pointe Drive Phone: 651-697-8506 Fax: 651-697-8555
Roseville, MN 55113-1105 skvilvang@ehlers-inc.com
16
Council member
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES
STATE OF MINNE S OTA
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 06-069
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO.3 AND ADOP'T'ING A MODIFICATION
TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 3THEREIN.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota
(the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Board of Commissioners (the "Board") of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
of St. Anthony (the "HRA") has heretofore established Redevelopment Project Area No. 3 and adopted
the Redevelopment Plan therefor and Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 and adopted the Tax
Increment Financing Plan therefor. It has been proposed that the City adopt a Modification to the
Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") for Redevelopment Project Area No. 3
and adopt a Modification to the Tax Increfxient Financing Plan (the "Tax Increment Plan Modification" or
together with the Redevelopment Plan Modification, the "Modifications") for Tax Increment Financing
District No. 3 (the "District"), all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, and Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, inclusive as amended (the
"Act"), all as reflected in the Modifications, and presented for the Council's consideration.
1.02. The Council has investigated the facts related to the Modifications and has caused the
Modifications to be prepared.
1.03. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption
and approval of the proposed Modifications, including, but not limited to, notification of Ramsey County
and Independent School District No. 282 having taxing jurisdiction over the property included in the
District, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law.
1.04. The City is not modifying the boundary nor term of the District.
Section 2. Findings for the Tax Increment Plan Modification
2.01. The Council hereby reaffirms the original findings for the District, namely that when Tax
Increment Financing District No. 3 was established, it was established as a "redevelopment district" under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10 (a)(1).
In addition, the City makes the following findings:
(a) The Tax Increment Plan Modification conforms to the general plan for development or
redevelopment of the City as a whole. The reason for supporting this finding is that the Tax
Increment Plan Modification will generally complement and serve to implement policies adopted
in the City's .comprehensive plan.
17
(b) The Tax Increment Pian Modification will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound
needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Redevelopment Project
Area No. 3. The reason for supporting this finding is that the development activities are necessary
so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within Redevelopment
Project Area No. 3.
(c) The Tax Increment Plan Modification provides budgetary authority to utilize increased tax
increment and to modify the budget to reflect actual project activity and to bring it into compliance
with the State Auditor budget requirements.
Section 3. Public Purpose
3.01. The adoption of the Modifications conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act
and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the State which is already built up, to provide
employment opportunities, to diversify the housing stock for the community, to improve the tax base and
to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose.
Section 4. Approval and Adoption of the Modifications; Filing
4.01. The Modifications are hereby approved, and shall be placed on file in the office of the City
Clerk. . Approval of the Modifications does 'not constitute approval of any project or a development
agreement with any developer.
4.02. The staff of the City are authorized to file the Modifications with the Minnesota
Department of Revenue and Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175; Subd. 4a.
4.03. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized -and directed to
proceed with the implementation of the Modifications and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and
present to this Council for its consideration all further modifications, resolutions, documents and contracts
necessary for this purpose.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member
, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Dated: August 22, 2006
Mayor
(Seal)
18
ATTEST:
City Clerk
MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3
(APACHE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT I- 9G)
(A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT)
F-1
hOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. ANTHONY
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
RAMSEY COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Public Hearing: April 25, 1992
Adopted: April 25, 1992
Modification: August 22, 2006
Prepared by: EHLERS &ASSOCIATES, INC.
3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 551 1 3-1 1 05
651-697-8500 fax: 651-697-8555 www.ehlers-ine.com
19
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3
Introduction Page 1
Duration of the District. Page 1
Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Jurisdictions . Page -1
Sources of Revenue/Bonded Indebtedness . Page
Use of Funds , Page 3
Other Limitations on Use of Tax Increment, Page 4
Appendix A -- Map of the Project Area and District
Appendix B -- Cashflow for the District
20
Introduction
The purpose of this modification is to provide budgetary authority to utilize increased tax increment and to
modify the budget to reflect actual project activity and to bring it into compliance with the State Auditor budget
requirements. The boundaries of Tax Increment District No. 3 (Apache Plaza Redevelopment I — 9G) are not
being changed.
(AS MODIFIED ONAUGUST 22, 2006)
Duration of the District
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration of the District must
be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469..176, Subd. 1b, the duration of the District
will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA, or City (a total of 26 years). The date of
receipt by the City of the first tax increment was 1998. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including
any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2023, or
when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the
legally required date.
Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Jurisdictions
The local government units other than the City which are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes
and in which the District is located, are Independent School District No. 282, Ramsey County, the HRA and
various metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission,
the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the local government
units).
The taxing jurisdictions encompassing the District will continue to receive taxes as if the Original tax Capacity
of the District were unchanged. This precludes the jurisdictions from benefiting from a portion of the increase
in Tax Capacity which results from the improvements to Parcels in the District or other development set forth in
Exhibit F is an estimate of the impact of the Creation of the District in the taxing jurisdiction of the taxable
property in -the District._
Ramsey County
City of St. Anthony*
ISD No. 282*
(ASMODIFI'.ED ONAUGUST 22, 2006)
IMPACT ON TAX BASE
Estimated
2005/2006
Tax Capacity
420,951,592
5,414,108
5,414,108
Estimated Captured
Tax Capacity (CTC)
Upon Completion **
Includes values for Hennepin County and Ramsey County
* Includes an 8% inflation factor for 200'7-2023
883,140
883,140
883,140
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony Modification to the TIF flan for TIF District No. 3
21
Percent of CTC
to Entity Total
0.2098%
16.3118%
16.3118%
1-
IMPACT ON TAX RATES
The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity and tag rates based upon the estimates for
the 2005/Pay 2006 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on the highest
estimated Captured Tax Capacity.
(ASMODIFIED ONAUGUST22, 2006)
Sources of Revenue/Bonded Indebtedness
The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonded indebtedness or other indebtedness as a result of the
TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the project will be financed by a bond issue or an interfund loan.
Additional indebtedness may be required to finance other authorized activities. The total principal
amount of bonded indebtedness, including a general obligation: (GO) TIF bond, or other indebtedness
related to the use of tax increment financing will not.exceed $12,200,000 without a modification to the TIEF
Plan pursuant to applicable statutory requirements.
Tax Increment
Interest
Developer Fee
Other
Interfund Loans
Transfers.
Bond Principal
TIF Note Principal
$12,200,000
$4,000,000
$100,000
$1,200,000
$12,200,000
$12,200,000
$12,200,000
$12,200,000
The other financing sources list above is included for purposes of OSA reporting for the TIF District. It
is not intended to be cumulative. Transfers are included in case money is moved from. one fund to
another before an expenditure.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony Modification to the TIE Plan for TIF District No. 3 2
22
2005/2006
Percent
Potential
Extension
of Total
CTC
Taxes
Rates
Ramsey County
0:46686
38.08%
883140
412,303
City of St. Anthony
0.45868
37.41%
883140
405,079
ISD No. 282
0.21764
17.75%
883,140
1929207
Other
0.08284
6.76%
883140
73,159
Total
1.22602 .
100.00%
1,0823747
The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity and tag rates based upon the estimates for
the 2005/Pay 2006 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on the highest
estimated Captured Tax Capacity.
(ASMODIFIED ONAUGUST22, 2006)
Sources of Revenue/Bonded Indebtedness
The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonded indebtedness or other indebtedness as a result of the
TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the project will be financed by a bond issue or an interfund loan.
Additional indebtedness may be required to finance other authorized activities. The total principal
amount of bonded indebtedness, including a general obligation: (GO) TIF bond, or other indebtedness
related to the use of tax increment financing will not.exceed $12,200,000 without a modification to the TIEF
Plan pursuant to applicable statutory requirements.
Tax Increment
Interest
Developer Fee
Other
Interfund Loans
Transfers.
Bond Principal
TIF Note Principal
$12,200,000
$4,000,000
$100,000
$1,200,000
$12,200,000
$12,200,000
$12,200,000
$12,200,000
The other financing sources list above is included for purposes of OSA reporting for the TIF District. It
is not intended to be cumulative. Transfers are included in case money is moved from. one fund to
another before an expenditure.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony Modification to the TIE Plan for TIF District No. 3 2
22
Estimated Public Redevelopment Costs
2. Public Redevelopment Costs. The present estimate of Public Redevelopment Costs are expected to be
as set forth below, plus interest to be paid on the Tax Increment Bonds during their term. (other than interest paid
from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds). In addition, the - HRA may use Tax Increment to pay for
additional Public Redevelopment Costs necessary to maintain the Shopping Center once the anticipated
renovation is completed. Such use of Tax Increment is not expected to occur for at least ten (10)..years and is
not expected to exceed $750,000 in 1992 dollars, and the use of Tax Increment for this purpose'is authorized
hereby.
Estimate of Public Redevelo-Dment Costs
Land Acquisition
$1,500,000
Demolition
$2751000
Public Utility/Site Improvements
$7005000
Relocation
$400,000
Administration
$100,000
TOTAL
$259751000
TTCP of Fi7ndv.
In order to facilitate the redevelopment of the District this TI' Plan authorizes the use of tax increment
financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds
associated with the District is outlined in the following table.
(AS MODIFIED ONA UGUST 22, 2006)
Land/Building Acquisition $3,500,000
Site Improvements/Preparation $3,500,000
Public Utilities $2,2501000
Public Improvements $25500,000
Streets and Sidewalks $2,50011#000
Interest $2,030,000
Administrative Costs (up to 10%) $15220,000
PROJECT COSTS TOTAL $179500'9400
Interfund Loans$125200NO
Transfers $1252005000
Bond Principal $12,2001000
TIF Note Principal $12,200,000
The above budget is organized according to the Office of State Auditor (OSA) reporting forms. The other
financing uses listed above is included for purposes of OSA reporting for the TIP District. It is not
intended to be cumulative. Transfers are included in case money is moved from one fund to another
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony - Modification to the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 3
W
before an expenditure. TIS' is expected to be used for the project costs listed above, which is a not -to -
exceed budget rather than an expected budget of costs.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (5),'it is estimated that the cost of improvements, including
administrative expenses which will be paid 'or financed with tax increments, will equal $17,500,000. For
purposes of OSA reporting forms, it is estimated that the cost of improvements, including financing which
will be paid for with tax increment will equal $54,100,000 as is presented in the budget above.
Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a
modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will
not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory
requirements. Project costs may be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside
of the District but within the boundaries of the Project, (including administrative costs, which are
considered to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in this TIF Plan.
(ASMODIFIED ONAUGUST 22, 2006)
Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment
1. Pooling Limitations. At least 75 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on
activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance
activities within said district or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. Not
more than 25 percent of said tax increments may be expended, through a development fund or otherwise,
on activities outside of the District except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced
bonds. For purposes of applying this restriction, all administrative expenses must be treated as if they
were solely for activities outside of the District.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony Modification to the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 3 4
24
Appendix A
Map of the Project Area and the District
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony Modification to the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 3
25
Legend
.. Corporate Boundary
TIF.District 3 - Cub Foods
11500 750 0
Feet
!ter :MW �
�wri ONE
X HM on Em
Mt Mr
,ram �•� MM MM
MM
�r ij i M�
MW
i Iz 212 1as
The Boundaries of Redevelopment Project No.
are coterminous Mth the corporate boundary of
Saint Anthony
[mill 1[1i1T,�III 11���I�It1� ; milli ilaitil'; :: M:
�11i ��ti�1�1 ■ � _� s 1f1��1�111111w hilli�ii�llli ; 11!111 :11 1 1 111 lll1� ■ �111lIt 11����� wn MM
Now
-0-1101
TiF Vis trict No, 3 -Cub Foods SSB
Appendix B
Cashflow for the District
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Anthony Modification to the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 3
27
81142006
Page I of 2
EHLERS
r.,41somms -lot
Taxes Per Total Market Class New
Sq. FtJUnIts Taxes Value Rate Tax Capacity_
TIF Distict No. 3
Cub Foods
St. Anthony Village
112
Cub Foods
330,982
Class Rate
After
180,000
1996
District Redevelopment District
Property Land
District #
913
Conversion
Inflation Rate - Every_ Years
5.00%
PID
Pay -As -You -Go Interest Rate:
6.00%
Tax Capacity Conversion
Note Issued Date (Present Value Date):
01 -Feb -96
3930 Silver Lake Rd
Local Tax Rate - Maximum
132.4520% Pay 1993
Fiscal Disparities Election (A - outside or B - Inside)
A
16,148
Year District was certified
Pay 1993
31-30-23-31-0030
Assumes First Tax Increment For District
1998
5,182
Year District was Modified
2006
3000 Silver Lake Rd
Development located in modified area
yes
276,100
Assumes First Tax Increment For Dev
1998
1993
Years of Tax Increment
26
Pond by Cub
Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment
2023
182
Fiscal Disparities Ratio
20.0944%
Pay 2006
Fiscal Disparities Metro Wide Tax Rate
121.8020%
Pay 2006
Local Tax Rate - Current
122.2510%
Pay 2006
State Wide Property Tax Rate (Used for total taxes)
51.0000%
Pay 2006
Market Value Tax Rate (used for total taxes)
0.214360%
Pay 2006
Commercial Industrial Class Rate
1.5%-2.0%
First 150,000
1.50%
Over 150,000
2.00%
Rental Class Rate
1.26%
ResIdental Class F - Under $500,000
1.00%
Over $500,000
1.25%
vidmt cmd uarieq upon review or t;ounty recorus on juiy 24,2uuts
Total Market Value
Year Use Sq. FtJUnits Sq. Ft./Units
Taxes Per Total Market Class New
Sq. FtJUnIts Taxes Value Rate Tax Capacity_
Year Date
Constructed Payable
Cub Foods
80,636
112
4.10
330,982
Class Rate
After
180,000
1996
2007
Property Land
Building Total Class
Original After
Conversion
Date
Address
PID
Owner Market Value
Market Value Market Value Rate
Tax Capacity Conversion
Tax Capacity
Payable
3930 Silver Lake Rd
31-30-23-31-0029
Cub Foods
807,400
1.6,148
16,148
1993
Unassigned
31-30-23-31-0030
Surrounding US Bank
259,100
5,182
5,182
1993
3000 Silver Lake Rd
31-30-23-31-0031
Video Update
276,100
4,772
4,772
1993
Unassigned
31-30-23-31-0032
Pond by Cub
9,100
182
182
1993
3810 Silver Lake Rd
31-30-23-34-0013
Conoco
277,800
4,806
4,806
1993
1 Totals
1,629,500
31,090
31,090
vidmt cmd uarieq upon review or t;ounty recorus on juiy 24,2uuts
Total Market Value
Year Use Sq. FtJUnits Sq. Ft./Units
Taxes Per Total Market Class New
Sq. FtJUnIts Taxes Value Rate Tax Capacity_
Year Date
Constructed Payable
Cub Foods
80,636
112
4.10
330,982
0,000,000
2.00%
180,000
1996
2007
Surrounding US Bank
N/A
N/A
N/A
13,936
524,400
2.00%
10,488
N/A
2007'
Video Update
8,520
179
4.64
39,567
1,623,300
1.5%-2.0%
29,716
1996
2007
Pond by Cub
N/A
NIA
NIA
242
9,100
1.5%-2.0%
182
N/A
2007
Con000
5,448
252
6.53
35,562
1,372,600
1.5%-2.0%
26,702
1997
2007
TOTAL
94,604
384,485
12,429,400
247,088
Note: Values are based upon estimates frog Nelahborhood Housina Siarvic�m (dAvs1iniriftr1
Note:
1. Residential does not pay State-wide property tax or Fiscal Disparities.
2. Development Is located In school district 709
Prepared by Ehlers
28
TIF Run 8-2-06
Y
Total
Local
Fiscal Local
Fiscal State-wide
Local
Fiscal
State-wide
Market
Use Tax
Tax
Disparities Tax
Disparities Property
Taxes
Disparities
Property
Value
Total
Capacity
Capacity
Tax Capacity Rate
Tax Rate Tax Rate
Taxes
Taxes
Taxes
Taxes
Cub Foods 247,088
152,211
0 1.22251
NIA N/A
186,079
NIA
N/A
20,417
206,495
TOTAL 247,088
247,088
NIA 1.22251
NIA NIA
302,068
N/A
N/A
20,417
206,495
Note:
1. Residential does not pay State-wide property tax or Fiscal Disparities.
2. Development Is located In school district 709
Prepared by Ehlers
28
TIF Run 8-2-06
8/14/2006
EL•
ST. ANTHONY VILLAG
Page 2 of 2
Prepared by Ehlers W Run 8-2-06
29
Base
Project
Market
Captured
Semi -Annual
State
Admin. Semi -Annual
Semi -Annual PAYMENT DATE
PERIOD BEGINNING
Tax
Tax
Value
Tax
Gross Tax
Auditor
atNet
Tax
Present PERIOD ENDING
Yrs.
Mth.
Yr.
Ca act
Capacity
Credlt loss
Capacity
Increment
0.36%
10.00%
Increment
Value
Yrs.
Mth.
Yr.
7.5
08-01
2005
31,090
31,090
0
0
1,606,218
0
(160,622)
1,445,596
1,403,491
8.0
02-01
2006
8.0
02-01
2006
31,090
247,088
0
215,998
132,030
(475)
(13,155)
118,399
1,515,094
8.5
08-01
2006
8.5
08-01
2006
31,090
247,088
0
215,998
132,030
(475)
(13,155)
118,399
1,623,446
9.0
02-01
2007
9.0
02-01
2007
31,090
259,442
0
228,352
139,582
(502)
(13,908) _
125,171
1,734,659
9.5
08-01
2007
9.5
08-01
2007
31,090
259,442
0
228,352
139,582
(502)
(13,908)
125,171
1,842,633
10.0
02-01
2008
10.0
02-01
2008
31,090
272,415
0
241,325-
147,511
(531)
(14,698) •
132,282
1,953,417
10.5
08-01
2008
10.5
08-01
2008
31,090
272,415
0
241,325
147,511 •
(531)
(14,698)
132,282
2,060,974
11.0
02-01
2009
11.0
02-01
2009
31,090
286,035
0
254,945
155,837
(561)
(15,528)
139,748
2,171,292
11.5
08-01
2009
11.5
08-01
2009
31,090
286,035
0
254,945
155,837•
(561)
(15,528)
139,748
2,278,397
12.0
02-01
2010
12.0
02-01
2010
31,090
300,337
0
269,247
164,579
(592)
(16,399)
147,587
2,388,216
12.5
08-01
2010
12.5
08-01
2010
31,090
300,337
0
269,247
164,579
(592)
(16,399)
147,587
2,494,837
13.0
02-01
2011
13.0
02-01
2011
*2011
31,090
315,354
0
284,264
173,758
(626)
(17,313)
155,819
2,604,125
13.5
08-01
2011
13.5
08-01
31,090
315,354
0
284,264
173,758
(626)
(17,313)
155,819
2,710,230
14.0
02-01
2012
14.0
02-01
2012
31,090
331,122
0
300,032
183,396
(660)
(18,274)
164,462
2,818,959
14.5
08-01
2012
14.5
08-01
2012
31,090
331,122
0
300,032
183,396
(660)
(18,274)
164,462
2,924,521
15.0
02-01
2013
15.0
02-01
2013
31,090
347,678
0
316,588
193,516
(697)
(19,282)
173,537
3,032,663
15.5
08-01
2013
15.5
08-01
2013
31,090
347,678
0
316,588
193,516
(697)
(19,282)
173,537
3,137,656
16.0
02-01
2014
16.0
02-01
2014
31,090
365,062
0
333,972
204,142
(735)
(20,341)
183,066
3,245,188
16.5
08-01
2014
16.5
08-01
'2014
31,090
365,062
0
333,972
204,142
(735)
(20,341)
183,066
3,349,588
17.0
02-01
2015
17.0
02-01
2015
31,090
383,315
0
352,225
215,299
(775)
(21,452)
193,072
3,456,487
17.5
08-01
2015
17.5
08-01
2015
31,090
383,315
0
352,225
215,299
(775)
(21,452)
193,072
3,560,273
18.0
02-01
2016
18.0
02-01
2016
31,090
402,480
0
371,390
227,014
(817)
(22,620)
203,577
3,606,518
18.5
08-01
2016
18.5
08-01
2016
31,090
402,.480
0
371,390
227,014
(817)
(22,620)
203,577
3,769,669
19.0
02-01
2017
19.0
02-01
2017
31,090
422,604
0
391,514
239,315
(862)
(23,845)
214,608
3,875,242
19.5
08-01
2017
19.5
08-01
2017
31,090
422,604
0
391,514
239,315
(862)
(23,845)
214,608
3,977,740
20.0
02-01
2018
20.0
02-01
2018
31,090
443,735
0
412,645
252,231
(908)
(25,132)
226,191
4,082,624
20.5
08-01
2018
20.5
08-01
2018
31,090
443,735
0
412,645
252,231
(908)
(25,132)
226,191
4,184,452
21.0
02-01
2019
21.0
02-01
2019
31,090
465,921
0
434,831
265,793
(957)
(26,484)
238,352
4,288,631
21.5
08-01
2019
21.5
08-01
2019
31,090
465,921
0
434,831
265,793
(957)
(26,484)
238,352
4,389,774
22.0
02-01
2020
22.0
02-01
2020
31,090
489,217
0
458,127
280,033
(1,008)
(27,902)
251,122
4,493,233
22.5
08-01
2020
22.5
08-01
2020
31,090
489,217
0
458,127
280,033
(1,008)
(27,902)
251,122
4,593,679
23.0
02-01
2021
23.0
02-01
2021
31,090
513,678
0
482,588
294,984
(1,062)
(29,392)
264,530
4,696,406
23.5
08-01
2021
23.5
08-01
2021
31,090
513,678
0
482,588
294,984
(1,062)
(29,392)
264,530
4,796,141
24.0
02-01
2022
24.0
02-01
2022
31,090
539,362
0
508,272
310,684
(1,118)
(30,957)
278,609
4,898,124
24.5
08-01
2022
24.5
08-01
2022.
31,090
539,362
0
508,272
310,684
(1,118)
(30,957)
278,609
4,997,137
25.0
02-01
2023
25.0
02-01
2023
31,090
566,330
0
535,240
327,168
(1,178)
(32,599)
293,391
5,098,367
25.5
08-01
2023
25.5
08-01
2023
31,090
566,330
0
535,240
327,168
1,178
(32,599)
293,391
5,196,648
26.0
02-01
2024
Totals
9,419,957
28 129
(939,183)
8,452,645
Present Value Data 2-01-1996
5,789,281
15 227
(577,405)
5196,648
NOTES:
1, State Auditor payment Is Based upon 1st half, pay 2006 actual and may Increase over t+arm of district.
2. Amount of increment
will
vary depending upon market value,
tax rates, class rates, construction schedule and Inflation on Market Value.
3. Inflatlan on tax rates cannot
be captured.
4. TIF does not capture state wide property taxes or market value property taxes.
Prepared by Ehlers W Run 8-2-06
29
STAFF REPORT
To: Mayor and City Council - Report No.:
From: Kim Moose -Sykes, Assistant City Manages KA
Date: August 22, 2006
Subject: Proposed Language Change to City's Chapter 5 Regarding Recycling Collection -- 3rd Reading
Background.: Staff met with representatives from the garbage haulers doing business in the City earlier this year
who were requesting that the City consider the possibility of changing the City's Ordinance language to -allow
recycling pick up every other week to accommodate single -sort recycling. At the July 25f City Council meeting,
Staff was directed to include additional language about glass as a recyclable and container size to the. proposed
draft.
Staff has since reviewed ordinances Or recycling policies of several Metro -area cities, including: Blaine,
Shoreview, Coon Rapids, Anoka, Arden Hills and New Brighton. In addition, Staff talked to recycling
coordinators from these cities to discuss other issues that are associated with the hauling of garbage, recyclables
and single sort recycling, such as:
Street maintenance --
"Pup" trucks to haul garbage and recyclables from large multi -family complexes and single
family residences that back on alleys.
The amount of truck traffic in the neighborhoods on "garbage day".
Noise and air pollution concerns.
Impact of heavy vehicles on City's streets and alleys.
Licensing Fees --
Currently, the City requires a business license for haulers at $150 per annum; is it similar to
those fees charged by other metro -area cities?
Can a nexus be established between the license fee and street/alley repair and replacement in
order to increase the fee so that it is more reflective of the City's cost to repair the streets?
Alternative Systems for Garbage/Recycling Hauling --
Municipal collection.
"Organized" collection
• Open (Free Market) collection
Require Multi -Family Residences as part of the City's recycling program..
Fuel consumption.
FAStaff Reports\08122006 Single Sort Recycling Ord Rev 3rd rdg.doe
30
The City's ordinance does not currently address these issues and perhaps while the City Council is considering
language change to the Ordinance to allow single -sort recycling, this is an opportunity examine these other issues
as well.
This meeting is the third reading of the proposed language change to Chapter 5 regarding recycling collection
and hauling.
Attachments:
Proposed Revised Ordinance Language.
City of Roseville Garbage and Recychng Report (1991; Rev. 2002)
License Fee Schedule -- various Metro -area Cities
Open vs. Organized Collections Residential Fee Structures
FAStaff Reports\08122006 Single Sort Recycling Ord Rev 3rd rdg.doc
4
(.c1 06 Pa
tion of yard waste and special waste (appliances, furniture, etc.), walk up service, give'a ice of
three different size containers. Most haulers charge extra for separate collection an r walk up
service. Prices are based on the size of the garbage coiltainer..Although it's no ear that all
haulers are meeting all these requirements. One resident in a -focus group orneowners said he
switched garbage haulers because the one he originally had refused to. ange a special pickup of
his yard waste.
Companies are required to notify the City and custome t least 60 days in advance of any
change in rates. Roseville has no rate change noti . tions on file for the past three years other
than changes made when: annual rates are file owever phone calls from residents to City staff
following the publishing of hauler rates ' e JanuaryNebruary Roseville wrap suggests custom-
ers are being charged a variety of ra not just the rate on file with the City.
There is no monitoring to ure haulers are following the terms of their licensing. Even if the
City were to find a cpany in non-compliance revoking a license would be an unlikely occur-
rence because o e ensuing negative reaction from that company's customers.
Comp 'es typically bill quarterly. Many bill for the quarter to come. The billing system used by
t aulers makes it so that residents are unable to switch haulers mid -quarter and receive a
Effect of Traffic
Following the 1991 report Options for Residential waste Collections and Recycling for Roseville
the Council divided the City into five zones. Garbage and recycling service is restricted to a
specific day of the week for each zone (see map below).
A minority of residents still has concerns about the amount of truck traffic on their streets. In the
2002 resident survey 22% were concerned about the effect garbage trucks have on air pollution,
L6L
41 PaV+
32 rev,*
ic.Un s
20% on noise pollution,' 17% on safety, 16% on street maintenance, 11% on neighborhood ap-
pearance while 63% were not concerned with any of these. Roseville streets are in much better
shape than they were in 1991. * According to Public works Director Duane Schwartz many
Roseville streets have been rebuilt in the past 15 years. Roseville roads typically last 20-30 years.
Most residential streets in Roseville are designed for 7 -ton maximum axle weight. The more
heavy-duty arterial streets are designed for 9 -ton maximum. axle weight.
As part of the City's Pavement Management Fund, every four years, Ro s eville's 120 miles of
streets are evaluated for their condition. This information is then used to determine. a mainte-
nance plan. The streets are also given a rating of 1 to 100. Above 65 means the street is in good
shape. Between 35 and 65 means the street needs repairs. Below 35 means the street needs to be
reconstructed. In 1985, 28 percent of Roseville streets were under a 35 rating. Now it is 1
percent. A survey a couple of years back showed that of comparable cities in the Metro area,
Roseville had the highest rating for its streets.
Streets in Roseville are kept in good shape because of the City's innovative Street Infrastructure
Repair Fund. Roseville set aside roughly $14 million available from pre -payment of bonds and
other sources. Interest on this money is used for the Street Infrastructure Repair Fund that pays
for various repair projects such as pavement patching. This keeps the cost for those projects off
presidents' property tax bills.
Roseville spends $600-700,000 a year on street repair and maintenance. Another $1.4 million
comes from state aid. Another $700-800,000 comes from the Street Infrastructure Repair Fund.
Schwartz says our Pavement Management Plan and our Street Infrastructure Repair Funds are the
envy of many cities throughout the country. He takes calls from other municipalities looking for
details on how our programs work._
However Schwartz says Roseville streets could last an estimated five to ten years longer if gar-
bage truck traffic was limited.
Garbage trucks put more wear and tear on streets than any other type of vehicle. According to the
report "Effects of Heavy -Vehicle Characteristics on Pavement Response and Performance" from
The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute axle weight most directly deter-
mines damage. to pavement and typical 3 axle garbage trucks have the highest axle weight of any
vehicle traveling city streets approximately 20,000 -lbs per front axle and a combined 44,000 lbs
on the rear pair (see table on following page from the University of Michigan).
According to Schwartz there is a formula for calculating the different impacts of different ve-
hicles.. Pavement design manuals give the following load factor values to vehicle types:
Car load factor = .0007
Truck 18,000 lb/axle =1.0
Garbage truck can be as high as 1.6
The formula used by MhDQT says 1 garbage truck trip is equal to 1,000 car trips in terms of
damage to pavement. Residential streets have average daily traffic counts of 200 to 500 vehicles.
42
33
* U& 4 4, im --QM. ** W -M Thai WW& M t
(Table Courtesy of the
University of Michigan
Transportation Research
Institute)
Schwartz devised a formula using these factors. He then factored in the life expectancy of a
Roseville street and the cost per mile of reconstructing that road (approximately $500,000 to
reconstruct one mile of 7 -ton street). Using his calculations he said by limiting the number of
garbage trucks on a Roseville street to approximately one hauler, it could extend the life of the
street 5 to 10 years. And based on the assessment charged to a typical homeowner that could
save the homeowner twenty to forty dollars a year.
The report from. the University of Michigan also shows that repeated starting and stopping (espe-
cially stopping) will increase the damage to streets by 50% to 100% depending on the speed of
the truck and the weight of the load being carried. Trucks with few stops on a block tend to be
traveling faster when they begin stopping.
Alternative Systems
Cities such as Minneapolis that have municipal collection have been using city crews and trucks
for many years. To start up a system of municipal collection would require a significant invest-
ment of money to purchase the trucks and hire the additional staff. That is why few if any Min-
nesota cities continue to use or are switching to municipal collection. That is also Why the
Committee chose not to consider municipal collection as an option.
However a number of cities are continuing to use or are switching to other forms of organized
collection that use private haulers. Organized collection of waste is when a city arranges for
collection services on behalf of residents. Cities do this for a number' of reasons including
lowering costs to residents, lessening truck traffic on city streets, designating a disposal facility
for the garbage in order to meet environmental goals, setting enforceable customer service stan-
dards and expanding the number of services available to residents. Organized collection is
cheaper for residents because haulers are able to save money with the more efficient system of
collection and that savings is passed on to residents.
43
M
White Bear Lake and North St. Paul each contract with one hauler to offer garbage and recycling
service to residents. Little Canada contracts with four haulers that each serves a specific zone in
the City. vadnais Heights contracts with a consortium of haulers and the members divide up the
service zones. Some cities bill residents themselves others have the haulers bill residents.
Officials at these cities say they get very few complaints about garbage service. - Joel Hansen City
Manager with Little Canada says he takes maybe two or three calls a year from residents wonder-
ing why the City has organized collection. Hansen told the Committee that once he explains the
benefits of organized 'collection the residents are satisfied.
Mark Sather City Manager of white Bear Lake says every time a contract comes up the City
takes a "zero based budgeting" philosophy, essentially charging themselves to prove the City
should continue with organized collection. Every time, the answer comes back "yes."
In addition to the benefits listed previously, Sather says ate Bear benefits because with guaran-
teed garbage collection there is less storage of excessive amounts of garbage, and the system can
support related public policy choices (e.g. discourage grass clipping generation by charging a
higher yard waste per bag charge in the summer months).
Sather believes organized collection answers the concerns of those who would prefer to choose
their own hauler. For the price conscious, it delivers about the, lowest rates possible under any
system. For the service conscious, the contract with haulers allows for walk up service and
subsidies for the disabled. For those looking for extra services, the contract allows for collection
of bulky items at a set rate.
�
6.0.1° -0aav arxoxj
y fir• v.•y .ty C• 5.
or:�':a1
:a1`
$1: .
Vacrias : ;egtl:.
�''-°�-� O ...0;N::ems ak
r.:eYoT
• }:
5 .�•« .t5+. :err Lvp;k r;�.: •'. ;. ..5..•• •�`
•i � !.: , •'wr•, i P A '(i�:e: • ++L r •v� 5 ,��(t'�l i ' . }kr:'•.+'r�+•r• y�(..1/.; Siti::..,�yv
\:. � .' •' •.f , ..t
a•' y • a . ' ••• I ter:
r).Ouf ° AVS�r?hV'� V:,` .•s'r� J.: v;r{�,:u.J.. •�i•.
pty." `'.
a ; : �". y; :. .• r . >r. k:X.; v , �• fr. ..•;:,:' S• e:`•'' •'S• ' ...'.:
y.1v n._vr�'►t' . �:._ . . y:'�.• •civ.: ''f"•$S"'i • .•rt`Ye` _ . M:IW:':+... i.:+f`5... ...+..��M ..S ':�:f:
Committee members assumed that competition in an
open hauling system would ensure residents got the
lowest rates. However a survey of Ramsey County cities
shows that Roseville residents pay $1.50-$4 more a
month on their waste collection bills compared to cities
with organized collection. Additionally the cities with
organized collection include .recycling in their fee.
Roseville residents pay an additional $1..75 a month for
recycling service. Making comparable Roseville fees
$3.25-$5.75 a month higher.
Cities with organized collection can also retain the opt -
out provision Roseville currently has. For instance Little
Canada exempts residents who are out o f town moxe than
30 days, business owners who take their residential trash and dispose of it in their company's
dumpster, and employees who are allowed to dispose of their residential trash in their company's
dumpster. Little Canada also offers a senior discount. we have seen in Roseville that that .would
be popular. Roseville gives a senior discount on water bills and currently 25.8% of water ac-
counts receive the senior discount.
The City of Hutchinson uses its system of organized collection to steer residents toward reducing
35
the amount of garbage they produce. Their system includes garbage, recycling and organics
collection. However the fee is based solely on the size of a resident's garbage cart. If residents
make full use of their recycling and organics collection they can decrease the size of their garbage
cart and save money. In the last couple of years 50% of Hutchinson residents have either de-
creased the size of their garbage cart or switched to less expensive every other week collection.
However switching to organized collection can be politically difficult. According to a 2001-2002
Ramsey County study on organized collection the public supported the County's environmental
goals but did not see how organized collection would help the County reach those goals. Slightly
more than half of those who responded to the County's study opposed organized collection.
Their five most frequently stated reasons the public gave for opposing it were:
® A desire to maintain choice of hauler
N Opposition to government involvement in collection
I Concern about quality of service
I Concern that costs would go up in an organized collection system
® Concern with the effect on competition, particularly on small haulers
Additionally garbage haulers are opposed to organized collection. At the Committee's focus
group with haulers, small haulers said they oppose organized collection because they fear they
would be unable to compete for a contract with large haulers and would thus lose customers.
Large haulers said they oppose organized collection because if small haulers are forced out of
business they could reach a quasi monopoly status that would bring increased government regula-
tion.
Haulers, mostly larger firms, retained a public relations firm and conducted a very active cam-
paign against Ramsey County's 20.01-2002 investigation of organized collection.
Ramsey County cited this opposition as a major reason for pursuing a different option for
managing waste. It will work with garbage haulers on a voluntary system to try and meet the
County's goals while reserving the right to re-examine organized collection if the.voluntary
system does not meet the goals.
Options Considered: All to include increased educational campaigns to alert residents .to the
environmental and financial aspects of waste management.
1) Preserve R.oseville's open collection system. Monitor Ramsey County's voluntary system
to see if it will meet City, County and State environmental goals.
2) Preserve Roseville's open collection system. work with haulers to increase services
offered in order to reduce waste, increase recycling and increase use of disposal facilities
other than landfills.
3) Switch to a system of organized collection with. one hauler for the City (that may or may
not include collection of recycling) that manages waste using a variety of methods accord-
ing to the State's hierarchy in order to minimize landfilling.
4) Switch to a system of organized collection with one hauler per zone or one consortium of
haulers per zone in the City (that may or may not include collection of recycling) that
manages waste using a variety of methods according to the State's hierarchy in order to
mini e landg.
45
36
5) Switch to a system of organized collection that preserves choice by having two haulers
per zone in. the City (that may or may not include' collection of recycling) that manages
waste using a variety of methods according to the State's hierarchy in order to e
landfilling.
6) Switch to a system of organized collection in which the City negotiates with a consortium
of haulers and allows the haulers to divide the City into service zones that manages -waste
using a variety of methods according to the State's hierarchy in order to ' e
landfilling.
Recommendation:
Committee members unanimously recommend a garbage system that meets the City's environ-
mental goals and the members' top priority of environmentally preferred management of waste.
That system should also follow the State hierarchy that prefers waste -reduction, reuse and recy-
cling; yard and food waste composting; and resource recovery with landfilling as the least pre-
ferred means of management. Of the methods studied by the Committee, an organized collection
system run by private haulers appears to give the City the best, and perhaps only, means to meet
the City's and State's environmental goals and balance citizen interests and concerns.
Given the current economics of the waste collection industry, the majority of Committee mem-
bets believe the best way to achieve environmentally preferred management of waste is through a
contract with a consortium consisting of all the current haulers in Roseville (as was done in
Vadnais Heights and Little Canada). - These consortiums typically divide the cities into zones
with one hauler assigned to each zone. However, Roseville may require more than one hauler per
zone in order to preserve customer choice. Such service may cost residents more than a single
hauler per zone system..
That contract is the only way where the City can specify that waste be managed using what is
currently the environmentally preferred waste method: a resource recovery facility.
Additionally, and in light of the ever changing waste management landscape, the Committee
strongly believes the City should monitor developments by the State, County and privdte sector to
determine if a future alternative might better meet the City's and State's environmental goals and
balance citizen interests and concerns.
Furthermore, the Committee believes a waste management system consisting of a consortium of
current private waste haulers in collaboration with the City could also provide the following
benefits to Roseville residents:
O Negotiated louver rates to customers (the top priority of the majority of residents
surveyed— 53%)
0 Preserve customer choice (the second highest priority of residents surveyed -- 40%)
U Limited truck traffic that reduces wear and tear on streets, thus reducing or delaying
property tax assessments for road maintenance or replacement
M
37
4 Limited truck traffic that reduces air pollution, noise pollution and improves or en-
hances neighborhood safety and appearance
O Strong performance and incentive -based contract provisions that would guarantee a
high level of customer service
4 Provide residents with clear, annual delineation. of haulers' services and
rates
4 Expand and .enhance residents' knowledge about the full range of public and private
services and costs for disposal of difficult items
The Cottee recognizes that there are Roseville residents who would not Want the City
Council to restrict their .ability to choose a garbage hauler, and that there are concerns
about how government involvement with the consortium of haulers might impact cost,
service and small haulers' viability, The Committee understands those concerns and
believes a City contract with a consortium of all the current haulers in Roseville will
preserve market share for small haulers, and allow the City to set strong performance and
incentive -based contract provisions that would guarantee a high level of customer service
while meeting residents expressed desires for lower rates and environmentally preferred
management of their waste.
47
38
Section Fee
Special amusement buildings' 200.00
Fire order reinspection fee 50.00
Removal of underground flammable liquid storage tank 75.00
Hazardous materials tank installation 100.00
Standpipe installation 50.00
Temporary structures/events 50.00
46-4(c)
Temporary use of mobile home outside mobile home park
250.00
46-4(d)(1)
Permit for mobile home to temporarily replace home damaged by
250.00
70-43(3)
disaster (limited to 90 days)
25.00
46-5
Recreation camping area site permit -each site
10.00
46-44
Manufactured home installation inspection fee
75.00
46-121(d)
Manufactured home park or recreational camping area
30.00Jacre +
Hockey rink
10.00/ea. lot
70-43(4)
Park usage fee for athletic fields —per field, per day
100.00 min.
62-33(e)
Residential.refuse/recycling collection:
125.00
70-43(5)
Unlimited service
13.65/mo.
60 gallon can service
11.65/mo.
30 gallon can service
8.15/mo.
62-33(f)
Disabled and senior citizen (must meet hardship conditions)
1/2 rate
62-34(3)
Private garbage haulers
75.00
62-91
Solid waste disposal license
750.00
70-1
Work in right-of-way permit:
Residential/lot
10.00
Commercial/lot
25.00
Utility installation (electric, gas)
150.00
70-3(b)(4) Telecommunications permit (includes Cable TV) 150.00
70-42(b)
Special event license fee -each event
25.00
70-43(1)
Deposit fee —per day
250.00
70-43(3)
Park lighting fee per hour athletic fields:
Baseball field
40.00
Football and soccer
40,00
Softball
40.00
Hockey rink
30.00
70-43(4)
Park usage fee for athletic fields —per field, per day
(does not include lighting)
125.00
70-43(5)
Park building usage fee —per day
100.00
Code
ELI
'A
x
City of Roseville
2006 Licensed Residential Trash Haulers
Roseville's solid waste ordinance requires waste haulers to provide three separate rates for
Roseville customers. The following monthly rates are submitted for informational pu'r'poses only
anTTo—not 'include taxes. Haulers are free to change rates at any time without notice. Not all
haulers serve the entire city. Haulers are required to offer walk up service, brush and yard waste
pickup. There may be an additional charge for those services. Call haulers to confirm pricing
and service. Recycling is exempt from State and County taxes - so by recycling more you can
-- - -1 - - - — I.1 — d A. 9 1 . 9 -
*Has agreed to take all garbage it collects in Roseville to the Resource Recovery Facility.
Back
to Utility Billing
41
■wREFUSE AND YARDWASTE COLLECTIONS
The City of Columbia Heights contracts with BFI
to provide refuse collection services to all ='
residents. Participation is required. The �CYy bibills
residents �quarterly for garbage�rec�and
yardwaste alongwith water and sewer.
..om®++�1 brnu'�- o.JB•- ca la �.a a4CaZ.
All'one and two unit dwellings are required to use
the provided garbage containers of 30, 60 or 90 -
gallon capacity.
HOLIDAY SCHEDULE 2006
Collections will be one day late following these
major holidays:
Memorial Day, Mon. May 29
July 4th Tuesday,
Labor Day, Mon, Sept 4
Thanksgiving, Thurs, Nov 23
Christmas Monday December 25
New Years, Monday Jan 1, 2007
CHRISTMAS TREES are collected on all levels
of service, ONLY in January. Put it next to the
trash on your regular collection day.
APPLIANCES are collected curbside with all
service levels, but you MUST CALL and request
a pickup. BFI(763) 784-2104
DOORS MUST BE OFF FREEZERS aY
AND REFRIGERATORS PER
STATE LAW!�f
Residential buildings with three or more units SERVICE LEVEL OPTIONS
must use dumpster service. Contact City Hall Three trash service levels are available to all YARDWASTE is collected from the front curb
763-706-3613 for information. residents of single family or duplexes in the City. April through November, weather permitting.
SERVICE LEVELS Must be bagged or bundled and weigh less than
GARBAGE COLLECTION
Households with ashould place their garbage
can and extra items at the alley line for collection.
Households without alleys should place the
garbage can and extra items at the curb for
collection.
RECYCLING
All recycling bins are collected from
the front curb. See Recycling
:1 r.
Brochure" for details on materials` w
collected curbside and at the
Recycling Center.
$11.85
$9.50
$9.07
90 Gallon
60 Gallon
30 Gallon
Appliances
Appliances
Appliances
Extras Bags010.111.
<
Large Items
Furniture
$1.45
Yardwaste
$1.45
Yardwaste
y
$1.45
Yardwaste
$1.73
Recycling
$1.73
Recycling
$1.73
Recycling
MONTHLY
TOTALS
$15.03
$12.68
$12.25
SENIOR RATE of $8.76/month is available
ONLY to homeowners over 65 and who are low
income qualified. Call 706-3640 for application
w
42
35 pounds.
Branches must be no longer than 4 feet in length
and bundled. Bundles should be less than 18" in
diameter. Stumps and branches larger than 4" are
not accepted.
Lumber is NOT yardwaste and should be cut or
bundled and put with trash..
QUESTIONS ??
City Hall (763) 706-3613
BFI (763) 784-2104
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE
ORDINANCE 2006-004
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CITY CODE,
BEING THE LICENSES, PERMITS AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The City Council of the City of St. Anthony Village ordains as follows:
555.01 Definitions. For purposes of this Section 555, the following terms have the following
meanings:
Subd. 3. Recyclables: Materials which may be recycled or reused through recycling
processes, including metal and plastic beverage containers, glass, newsprint, and any
other materials. designated as recyclables by Council resolution.
Subd. 11'. Residential Container: Any container intended for. the collection of waste or
recycling materials that has a volume of 100 gallons or smaller container upon request of
the resident.
555.02 Licensing Requirements.
Subd. 5. In addition to the other requirements of this Section, haulers servicing
residences must comply with the following:
(a) Curbside recycling collection will be made available to all residential customers. At
minimum, such service must include bi-weekly collection and hauling of all
recyclables on collection days. Charges for service to customers who have no
curbside recycling collection will be no less than the charges for services, which
include curbside recycling collection.
555.03 Requirements and Restrictions. All licensees and any other haulers in the City, must
comply with all of the following requirements and restrictions:
(k). Haulers are required to provide residential containers for recycling that will hold 100
gallons or smaller container upon request of the resident.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Adopted:
July 25, 2006
August 8, 2006
August 22, 2006
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publish: St. Anthony Bulletin
August 30, 2006
43
Mayor
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 7, 2006
TO: City Council
FROM: Mike Mornson, City Manager .
Roger Larson, Finance Director
The current agreement for road maintenance with Hennepin County expires on
12/31/2006, The agreement relates to payment for services the City performs relating to
County State Aid Highways within the City limits. Those services include: snow
removal;. street sweeping; mowing; flushing; and disposal of debris.
Based on the rising costs of fuel and maintenance, Jay Hartman and I met with
representatives from the County to request the new contract be increased significantly to
include the rising costs for motor fuels, maintenance, .repairs and wages.
Previously the contract included a flat annual payment that was increased by a percentage
each year which had no ability to factor in escalating changes or market conditions.
Hennepin County has addressed our concerns by offering payment at the same level as if
they were performing the service themselves. The costs are based on a formula that takes
into consideration the length of the street, the billable unit price of the machine used and
the months of service,
I have reviewed the financial structure of the contract and am comfortable with how the
County has structured the payment schedule. It includes a fair estimate and payment of
what the actual costs are associated with the maintenance of these roads..
In addition, another safety buffer in the agreement allows for changes to the billable unit
price. The rate of each piece of equipment is reviewed annually and adjusted to reflect an
increase in the contract payment to the City for inflationary and uncontrollable cost
increases.
The 2007 payment will total $24,994.00 compared to the 2006 payment of $11,314.00.
Recommendation:
Council approves the Hennepin County Road Maintenance Agreement for the term of 5 -
years - 01/01/2007 through 12/31/2011.
MA
Contract No 5021M6
Agreement No. PW 14-10-06
County Road Maintenance
City of St. Anthony
County of Hennepin
COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF.
HENNEPIN, STATE OF . S OTA, hereinafter referred. to as the "COUNTY," A-2300
Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487, on behalf of the Hennepin County
Department of Transportation, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina Minnesota 55340, hereinafter referred
to as the "DEPARTMENT" and the City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony
Minnesota 55418, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1, the parties
desire to enter into an agreement relating to the maintenance of County State Aid Highways
within and adjacent to the corporate limits of the City upon the terms and conditions hereinafter
set forth,
NOW, THEREFORE, The parties do agree as follows:
The CITY will, during the term of this Agreement, maintain as hereinafter provided, those
portions of County State Aid Highways within and adjacent to the corporate limits of the CITY
listed as follows:
Milea e
Centerline Lane
CSAH 27 - between St. Anthony*Boulevard and 37th Ave. N.E. 1.16 4.64
CSAH 136 - between CSAH 153 and 37th Avenue N.E. 1.25. 3.82
CSAH 153 - between Stinson Boulevard and CSAH 136 0.53 2.12
CSAH 88 - between St. Anthony Blvd. and East County Line 0.70 2.80.
(Snow and ice control on CSAH 88 is covered by another agreement)
1. TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT
The CITY agrees to furnish services to 'the COUNTY" during the period commencing
.January 1, 2007 and terminating December 31, 2011
HCA Form No. 101 2005 (Revised 09/04) 1
45
Contract No 5 021 M6
Agreement No. PW 14-10-06
The County will pay the City for maintenance operations as specified herein for the term
of the Agreement, the amounts set forth in the Schedule of Costs marked Exhibit "A"
attached and incorporated by this reference. -
Costs. for Snow and Ice Control are based on- a moving three --year average of the County's
total maintenance cost for .snow and Ice Control on all County State Aid Highways and
County Roads maintained by Hennepin County forces.
Costs for flush and sweeping as defined, are based on a moving three—year average of the
County's maintenance costs for -a Selected. Sample of Urban County State Aid
Highways, as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached and incorporated herein by reference.
2.. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
The maintenance to be performed by the City on CSAH's 27, 136 and 153, (10.58 lane
miles) shall consist of the following.-
a.
ollowing:
a. Keep the aforesaid portions of County State Aid Highways reasonably free and clear
from snow, ice acid debris, and undertake proper sanding and/or salting when
necessary. It shall be the City's responsibility to maintain the fluid traffic lanes to
their -full width and cleared to bare pavement within a reasonable period of time
following each winter storm.
b. Keeping aforementioned County State Aid Highways reasonably free of all
obstructions and impediments. The said maintenance shall include Bushing,
sweeping, and disposal of debris during the calendar year.
The maintenance to be performed by the City on CSAH 88, (2.80.1ane miles) shall consist
of the following:
a. Keeping aforementioned County State Aid Highways reasonably free of all
obstructions and impediments. The said maintenance shall include flushing,
sweeping, island broom.ing/sweeping and disposal of debris during the calendar
year.
b. Mow the grassed areas of the aforementioned County State Aid Highway as needed.
Said mowing does not include the steep ditches on the east side.
Upon any changes in the lane miles covered by this Agreement during the term of this
Agreement the city shall continue to maintain County roadways and shall be paid the
amount to which it is entitled in accordance with the terms of this Agreement at the unit
prices indicated in said Exhibit "A". Said changes, substitutions, additions or removals
shall be prorated according to months of service.
HCA Form No. 1012005 (Revised 09/04) 2
S